5-15 Town of North Topsail Beach Objection Letters

E.S, Feltman
1102 Branch Street, N W
Wilson, NC 27893
October 17, 2014
Deborah Wilson
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Dear Ms. Wilson,
I have recently learned of the proposal to build a 101 space parking lot along the beach
on North Topsail Island across the street from Rogers Bay Campground and next to St.
Moritz condominiums. 1 understand that CAMA has received an application for the
project. if this is the case, I hope that you will consider my concerns prior to approving
the project.
1 have been a property owner at North Topsail Beach for a number of years and frequent
the area of the proposed parking lot on a regular basis. There is a thin line of sand dunes
separating the proposed parking area from the beach. At high tide the surf reaches the
base of the sand dunes leaving virtually no beach for walking or sunbathing that is not
under water. If people are on the beach in this area at high tide there is nowhere for them
to go except up on the dunes.
As I am sure you are aware, beach front flora plays a major role in stabilizing the dunes
and preventing beach erosion and inland movement of dunes. If this parking area is built
it will attract people to come to the beach where there is no beach to support their
activities and they will undoubtedly be pushed up on the dunes and destroy what little
plant life there is supporting the dunes. As far as inland movement of the dunes this
would not be possible because there would be a parking lot abutting the dunes allowing
no room for movement.
The parking lot plan is a recipe for disaster at this location and I hope you will prevent
this from occurring.
Sincerely,
Q�
E.S. Feltman
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 2 2 2014

Deborah Wilson October 13, 2014
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr. Ext.
Wilmington, North Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms. Wilson,
I have recently been informed of a proposed change to the parking lot site 3 in North Topsail Beach, NC
and am writing to express my concern. The Town of North Topsail Beach has submitted an application to
CAMA for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St. Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
My family has owned a lot in Rogers Bay Campground for over ten years. In that time, we have
thoroughly enjoyed North Topsail's well preserved beach and family atmosphere. After the change to a
public access this past season, I have been appalled at the condition that I see our beach being left in,
not to mention the less than family friendly atmosphere at times, particularly on holiday weekends.
As owners, residents at Rogers Bay and St. Moritz have a vested interest in the condition of the beach
and have respected the dunes, the sea turtle nests, and have cleaned up after ourselves. This past year,
there was more trash left on the beach than ever before and people parked on and placed their beach
chairs and blankets in the lower part of the dunes.
North Topsail is a narrow beach particularly at high tide. Last year people were literally side by side with
no room to pass through when the tide came in. There were several times we just left the beach
because there was no room to move around. I wonder where all of the people would go during high tide
if this proposed plan is approved. I also wonder how emergency personnel can possibly get in to help
someone if the need arises.
This summer we saw several instances where police had to be called to help with disagreements, some
that almost came to blows. This is the first time in the years that we have been owners that we have had
this experience. I am concerned that the town may not be equipped to handle the extra security issues
that may arise.
I am also concerned about increased traffic where it is already so busy and congested. Though a
crosswalk has been placed from the campground to the beach access, there is not a warning light so
motorists clearly see the crossing. I have seen near accidents because motorists are not paying attention
to the pedestrians crossing the road.
I wonder why the town considers this a good idea. If it is the hope that allowing more public access will
boost the local economy, I would argue that will not be the case. The people that spend money at the
local businesses and restaurants are those who live in and/or rent the campground lots, condominiums,
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 222014

.. - ._. .I , ": f. , - �• sir �' r'.,' 1:,L .-."V r

and beach houses. The people that visit the beach for the day are bringing their own snacks, drinks of all
descriptions, and even grills to the beach and then they head home, usually leaving a mess behind.
Granting this permit will increase congestion, security issues, and potential hazards to pedestrians. It will
also likely do harm to the ecosystem that we appreciate and are trying protect, so I am encouraging you
not to grant this permit.
Thank you for taking the time to consider my concerns.
Sincerely,
14%
I
Julie Hesse
Property owner Rogers Bay Campground
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 2 2 Z014

Deborah Wilson September 25, 2014
District Manager CAMA
12.7 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101 -space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
0CM WILMINGTON, NC

With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
I%pi7r.a�(G�a.�+'�z A.{(e Loggxi-ile.(cC ve5f' i�ia� �4r< phalr/m ivl5
dv, Eco sys{w.. i',� /� s Rrz.+, f�x� Is sa fop,—{i. Arm.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
With best regards,
Ronnie & Lisa Byrd
2065 Royce Dr.
Mebane, NC 27302
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 142014

October 10, 2014
Deborah Wilson
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext
Wilmington NC 28405
Dear Ms. Wilson,
I am writing to express concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in North Topsail
Beach NC. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA for a major
permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101 space parking lot on the leased property across
from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private ocean front condominium
property.
My family and I own camping lots in the campground and have spent many summers enjoying
this beach area. I am worried about the parking lot as the beach is very narrow especially at
high tide. There are approximately 400 lots in the campground and 30 duplex residents in the
condos that use this beach area. We appreciate and respect the area ensuring it stays clean
and always watch out for nesting turtles as we typically have a few nests each year. This past
season was the first year our parking area was open to the public. The beach was very crowded
and high tide pushed people up onto the dunes. The beach was littered in trash and we often
witnessed people bringing charcoal grills, etc on the beach and not cleaning up behind
themselves.
I am also concerned that people in the campground must cross the highway to get to the
beach. This is already a safety issue and will be made worse by an additional 100+vehicles
coming in and out of the lot.
I understand that North Topsail Beach is trying to accommodate visitors with additional parking
but I am concerned that this particular location would cause more damage to the beach by
overloading this area with more people than it can handle. I care about our beaches and
community and do not want to see it destroyed.
Thank you for your consideration of this matter.
Regards,
Greg and ri McKoy
Rogers Bay Family Campground
Home Address: 4244 NC Hwy 53 E Burgaw NC 28425 RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC

Deborah Wilson September 25, 2014
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
1 am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
I fl�lly�
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
iICT 142014

With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
With best regards, ���
OL, -
Mrs Marion Fields
14900 NC Highway 87 N
Eden, NC 27288
RECEIVED
1]CM WILMINGTON, NO
� IIJ W014

Deborah Wilson
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
September 25, 2014
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 14 2014

With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
With best regards,
tv,J
'IVIS' Ucz-
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC

Division of Coastal Management January 22, 2015 RECEIVED
400 Commerce Avenue FEB 0 3 2015
Morehead City, NC 28557
°'pr>r-AbNM ITV
This letter is in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in North Topsail Beach, N.C.and the
approval of a major CAMA permit on the leased property across from Rogers Bay Campground,
with the St Moritz, a private oceanfront condominium property to the north, and duplexes to the
south. The major permit number is 5-15 issued on January 15,2015.
As a local homeowner, I have several objections about this major permit approval:
(1) This area ah-eady has a large number of surrounding residents/property owners, including
more than 420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground, 32 unit owners at the St
Moritz to the north, and approximately 30 additional duplex residences to the south of the
proposed parking lot;
(2) There is limited beach, only a few feet, at high tide the public will sit in the dunes
(3) A proposed public parking for 101 vehicles would potentially add 100-400 (1-4 persons
per vehicle) that require access to this limited beach;
(4) The beach is also home to nesting turtles and susceptible to significant erosion;
(5) The lack of beach at high tide with the space requirements of that many additional people
is expected to result in unintentional damage to the dunes and wildlife, and accelerate
erosion;
(6) Traffic congestion in an already densely populated location is expected to be an
additional issue; and
(7) There are significant safety concerns for pedestrians from Rogers Bay who need to cross
the street to access the beach.
(8) The removal of mature vegetation further jeopardizes the integrity of our fragile dune
barrier system.
I am therefore very concerned that the size of this parking is not acceptable and needs to be
reduced to more reasonable proportions to allow access to the beach while preserving the dunes
and protecting the neighboring properties. This major permit is in need of further review. You
are placing properties and a fragile beach at further risk in an area where there has been no
benefit of beach nourishment
Thank you for your consideration.
Martin Lang- St Moritz property owner
f h (" k'v (ft
2033 Sauc; �h
C�Vtr�\ShL,�� 0
CC D( fr'�

Martin and men Lang
€ -vz
2033 Souli Drive
Greensburg, PA 15601 2:5 ADN `0155 PIA `? L
il,n• }jb Il
Iv c n �j ( -
�� (p httV
N.(�-A �
2 7 6 S _ = s,_ 19 7 � � �I�+lu�•I�bhPib�!{I"f•►t,Pdii11�111111,1„� lu,li.iir

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor
Secretary
January 12, 2015
Peggy Valentine
4110 Island Drive, Unit 301
North Topsail Beach, NC 28460
Dear Mrs. Valentine,
Thank you for your letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone]Internet: www.ncdenr.gov,
An Equal Opportunity I Affirmalive Action Employer —Made in part by recycled paper

08-24-2014 12:36 AM 17077422605
19103953964 Pg 1/4
Mrs. Deborah Wilson
CAMA
127 Cardinal Drive
Wilmington, NC 28405
Re: North Topsail Beach
Proposed Parking Lot
Site # 3
Dear Mrs. Wilson;
Eric,
PEGGY A. VALENTINE
4110Island Drive, Unit 301
North Topsail Beach, NC 28460
Cell919-389-7581
August 25, 2024
Attached are the Riggs document I discussed with you by telephone on August 22, 2014.
Thank you for your time and listening to me.
S' rely;
1
Peggy A. Valentine
RECEIVED
j DCM WILMINGTON, INC
Y AUG 2 6 2014

08-24-2014 12:36 AM 17077422605
19103953964 Pg 2/4
Print
Date. Monday, August 25, 201412:08 PM
From, Dillard Powell <dmpowelIQbeBsoutn.net>
To Peggy Valentine<[e-mail]>
Subject: Fw* NTB proposed parking
On Monday, August 18, 2014 11:29 PM, Martin Lang <[e-mail]> wrote:
Hello Owners -
Please review the first two pages of this attachment, document your response and mall back
to Riggs and Associates ,P.O. Box 1570, Jacksonville NC. 28541.
A lack of response is considered to be no objection to a proposed public parking lot of 101
spaces adjacent to the St Moritz property.
Riggs and Associates has been contracted by NTB to propose the development of a public
parking lot. Attached is the project narrative which will accompany a major permit application.
We have confirmation that to date, no major permit has not been submitted to DCM by North
Topsail Beach.
The board will respond as individual owners, not on behalf of all owners
Our position is that "I Foot" of beach at high water is not sufficient to support an Influx of a
minimum of 200 additional people without causing a detriment to the environment. Our fragile
beach and wildlife will be placed In harms way. We are concerned for public safety as well as the
preservation of our limited dune system. There is no adequate beach during high tide within our
densely populated neighborhood. We will check the box "Objections to the proposal" and return
via US Mail.
The board will continue our efforts to communicate with the town while balancing concerns for
the environment and community.
Please understand that no response Is a show of support fpr the development of this public
parking and the window to respond Is time sensitive. Print and distribute to any owners that I
may have missed, Thank you.
Sincerely,
Martin Lang- St Moritz Board
, giggs request site 3.pdf
RECDVED
t�llqa/41 DCM WILMINGTON, NC
AUG 262014

08-24-2014 12:36 AM 17077422605 19103953964 Pg 3/4
PROJECT NARRATIVE
MAJOR CAMA
TOWN OF NORTH TOPSAIL BEACH PARKING — SITE 3
AUGUST 2014
On behalf of The Torun of North Topsail Beach, Charles F. Riggs & Associates, Inc. submits this
narrative for Division of Coastal Management's Major CAMA Permit pertaining to the
construction of new parking lot area in the North Topsail Beach,
The Town of North Topsail Beach proposes to create new parking areas adjoining their current
parking on 4.947 acres of land leased on NC Highway 210/Island Drive in Onslow County. The
parking design proposes 75 new spaces in addition to the approximately existing 26 perking and
complimentary amenities such as: restrooms with screening, bike rack, outdoor shower and
water spigot for rinse down along with one wood dune handicap accessible ramp and dune
crossover for beach access. The parking lot is combination of ABC stone (impervious) and
pervious gravel. One new driveway connection to an existing public NCDOT street will have
asphalt apron; gates will be installed to limit access to Town determined hours of operation. The
existing parking lot entrance will he relocated slightly to align with the Roger's Bay
Campground entrance road across NC Hwy 210 while the existing marked cross walk will
remain unchanged. As much of the existing, stable and significant vegetation as possible along
Hwy 210 will be undisturbed. The existing dune crossover near St. Moritz that is used by
Roger's Bay Campground will not be incorporated as a pedestrian access for the new parking lot
and will be blocked with new vegetation screening/buffering. Any impervious surface will be
divided by 2' narrow strips of pervious stone to limit the square footage of each area to less than
5000 square which eliminates the need to double the 60' small CAMA setback to 120' large
CAMA setback. The CAMA setback establishes extent and limits for new improvements similar
to parking lots. Site is readily served by both ONWASA for water and Phrris for sewer. Public
monies are used in the development. Approximate Mean High Water Line (MHWL) was
surveyed as F foot (NAVD88).
The site is sandy and has rapid infiltration from the soil type identified and infiltration testing
performed by Land Management Group. Stormwater will be permitted under a Low Density
Stormwater Permit with sheet flow infiltrating in the sand 8s pervious gravel adjacent to the ABC
parking. The project timing will be 1-2 weeks with a very short duration of exposed soil. The
short duration of the project and ground stabilization (stone) will prevent sediment from leaving
aite.
Ill
DECEIVED
Je . t / DCM WILMINGTON, NC
AUG 2 6 2014

08-24-2014 12:36 AM 17077422605
19103953964 Fig 4/4
CHARLES F. RIGGS &. ASSOCIATES, INC.
Land Surveyors
Glades F. RIW P.L.S. L-2981 502 NEW BRIDGE STREET WErninoun ofte:
Janet A. Lewb, P.L.S. L-4562 P.O. Box 1570 101 Scem Hill Loop Rod
Kenneth F. Johnson, P.LS. L4925 JACKSONVILLB, NORTH CAROLINA 28541 WilmirrM U.C. 29411
Corporate License (C430) TELEPHONE: [phone] [phone]
E-MAIL: riggga&[e-mail]
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER STATEMENT
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to three tracts (Tax IDs 769-4, 7694.3, 769-9.1) owned by
Topsail Beach, LLC & RAJDC Holding, Inc, on island Drive (Hwy 210), Town of North Topsail Beach,
Stump Sound Township, Onslow County, North Carolina. Town of North Topsail Beach leases the land and
proposes to construct as 5W a parking lot consisting of impervious and pervious stone surface
complimented with temporary portable restroom structures, hose spigot for rinsing station and one wooden
handicap accessible crossover accesses to the beach area, The existing parking area will be incorporated
into the new development plan to provide uniformed/designated parking spaces. Water service will be
provided by ONWASA. All areas of environmental concern have been evaluated by the North Carolina
Division of Coastal Management and US. Army Corps of Engineers; these arose have been identified on the
enclosed plans.
The State of North Carolina Division of Coastal Management does not require a response; however the State
does consider no response to be no objection. If you do wish to respond or if you have objections, please
state them in the space below and return this form in the addressed, stamped envelope provided to Charles F.
Riggs & Associates, Inc., P. O. Box 1570, Jacksonville, NC 28541.
Please check the appropriate space for your response.
I have objections to the proposal,
I have no objections to the proposal.
Signature Date
Print or Type Name
Telephone Number
Commenter;
4 &• i
RE-CEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
AUG 2 6 2014

PEGGY A. VALENTINE
4110 Island Drive, Unit 301
North Topsail Beach, NC 28460
Cell 919-389-7681
August 27, 2014
Mrs. Deborah Wilson, District Manager
N. C. Division of Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
Re: North Topsail Beach Parking Lot
Site # 3
Dear Mrs. Wilson:
I STRONGLY OPPOSE the NTB Site 3 Parking Lot Application, and urge that the application be
denied for following reasons:
1. HIGH DENSITY POPULATED AREA: "Site 3" is at the most densely populated area in the town
of North Topsail Beach.
In a letter written 6/24/13 by NTB Mayor, Dan Tuman, he said there 2500 residential properties
in NTB. Counting 446 owners in Roger Bay and the 32 units in St. Moritz plus adjacent home
owners that is close to 500 owners; 1/5 of NTB owners in this 1/4 mile of HWY 210. The beach
simply can not handle an additional 100 more vehicles with probably 4 people per vehicle.
2. OVERCROWDED: More People on Beach: There is almost no beach at high tide. During the
most populated time on the beach from 10:00 AM through 5:00 PM there is usually a high
tide. We must consider 1 %: hr. before high tide, and 1 % hr. after high tide (3 hr.) there is
less usable beach. SEE ATTACHED PICTURES.
3. DUNE DAMAGE: Additional people will damage fragile man man dunes. SEE ATTACHED
PICTURES.
4. LOSS OF NATURAL VEGITATION: Natural vegetation is vital to protect man made dune, and
wildlife.
5. DAMAGE TO SEA TURTLES: Normally 2 to 3 nests per year. Already have 2 this year.
6. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY: Already dangerous crosswalk with pedestrians, golf carts, and
vehicles. Adding more TURNING traffic, and additional driveway will be very hazardous.
There was an accident at crosswalk last week end (8/24/2014).
SEE ATTACHED PICTURES.
VED
DCM W LM NIGTON, NC
�' 2014

THANK YOU for your time and interest. ALL considerations are appreciated.
sincerely,�
Peggy A. Valentine )
DCM RECEIVED
GTON, NC
SEP 0 2 2014

RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
SEP 0 2 2014

PAoiaed 64&,14 NZeA,
oy
„ La" di4 man. PA
,�&/7
RECEIVEc
DCM WILMINGTON. NC
SEP 0 2 2014

S
) MR
O S�.xr _. v� __ .
--------•- -
CNARLES F. RIGGS & ASSOCIATES, MC.
-- - - - - -
------.--- --- - - - - _-
1 {{1J
ii1 T I rc1Ti'C --
''� msasair
- -` - - 3,;
o 6-
��',..�......,.,....
SITE /9 ❑..�..,..,...,...,.
' ® TORN OF NORTH TOPSAIL BEACH
R� ••�
n.. srlen vv on. ,».... eie
nuo mw
..e.3
_ s s
flo:
_
���FLCti
cues eua
!/

a-P Pstl-r^.ao"n u�ieWmiP
rmm�rwsrzs--zaw
q.aP•It plrn~
•°`"`swm'.P"n s v
:ui11e:: Mae
^4°w' 1: °e^.n��•
rmllav' Pwn w n'n
%m �
, ,rear u.9m aver rm m mqt rm
r wS� �•mlmW..w w n • m
w. atlr0 u<w r r a rw sla.ne. <n..1. vm
Pa�wrP w.-�m
I..m vw�.�."+Q'Tm.sam.�a�1P
. i ea le.m<u a,um,m www.,m.0 ew.0
n... �
+meam.. mu wlai
.wmw<mM wm mY YtWMIRtl1'n0.Yw11
��1lep�
v1uT OF s-m. xlP rR
��a��o all OAYYn.O1tlM
ZZIIMriMS mmW.7 Pmmm ♦.—w..hmP -
��
m�Y. 'P'e' wW. P Im.P Wm<
,m re.Y. „®I seer P
Lwna w.e0tl.
�e� rYO.f4WNMV•WPN
-
mPmY WWO rx «.m w
IaPn1•PW9�m:,n xYmrauiar
iWCeb en cmrPoam tt OWP4
ro Pex W,
aW.W4 miv, rro
c i
Y
I
Ak
� I I
I I I
'IIMw^k
ua
'+m'7+. nern '• .ram. _ _
Mal tl1 .mY¢R.
rxDc xauxm ac
wNI,WY..
LLas "I Y m
ed 1� rrr IM ,
�
- -� ------ -- -- -- - r
------ - - -- - ------------��------------- — -_ C_= s_�-.---
--- m --------------
- - ---- ------ -
`
❑
¢mmc .wlr7nw raenr . ,s¢ qR
gMWAR. 5R<3i���inrnWl WM W erPrm, r. r utl
Nam
E rm ,x�.rl&I[ YRMMti
t
n . r.s4i.ilm +.��M[l'Yr-imIW 4Y.n
MIMtl OiM
e.Wr la
yYA<ins nmu�ic�-
ew wnawr�l tlliW
II!'L41M111Y
�
❑
45mW .M0YM Y1P4. ML h.L
spu w.wlTi�ntlw+.am�ew w
ri Mo' w s�
.0 +Ip ,mn 4r u4.n wn,lY .rw
• u�
I'Iil lE�l'1�
�w�+[u�iw Rxen n r wr l ae� r •r
IL��e TMa, w,a mo. ia'aw� 4e�R urw
:{�q. m� _-r♦P.m9nm
♦ motiitlr:Wre Ylge—vrsrvas�w mild
�wWn°�m.�ira wa u.'m1�
m°�n°Po w*'.n w<oa mmv�wrrio sx awe vaiw we
IIG IMLWLYHAf
A Wxl� DIII,YR Y11Pm • NM i1L
❑
,
AKJEPU14GQ9AmLT4
TSllm uex� x-�san
r�iw�rwm—Esau-rer�.w. r�'°aYmm' °m'��a
�r'.RM1'!•✓M3'.C': (.R •�y.(n
ZVI
ua,..
wma® re me aln9. wn wL
SITE #3
® O
�
Onm ww.9 tlpall.atl n.Ipu, aP.ao
aai ;
�l �. env qe+e O ren e...mmr a uesa ax.lm
VMONG M[. 0[LCOPYpi P4Mf
Y w
�e>�ew wY<.
�
LES F. RIGGS & ASSOCIATES, INC. rc_a4D1
m I,u
TOWN OF NORTH TOPSAIL. BEACH
IVAPf1EM - COWPfNf10 & =&4Z PD =Nln 1TSiTYJ.
uq a PpC VE4 n M D.S. 1187. P. W. oa iW P. ns D DA 10/].
LND PIJW & CD mmn WIPPIM
�
4NW SWNO tOWXSi. O W CIXP1m. WMIX 4NUR"x
,m .iv erDa fnRr
o it mA 1n m m x,L Lmr roro
iamn,m
w °O i mio
UiN
TC ML BEIWI LLG Oigy OX 1147. P. Nf t DX Ml, P. 04
nSipY. It i1e,-)0A IYVMiM. xC W"
fFIW�
q, A. IprpEYS g41iN11gp:;My, eM101. 010. 11 R D16
wlas: mn seFO� mwlwf. mm in-,w
ttuo mw
wa"i.rr��n
r:"srsiPme. Pr.+m�
—m'rwe bias
rrs rsW is P~im� �
DLit
Y �Irlwallf ��
xeW i.owaa.
R uOrR
na
W J
R,p 1 O
Im'tl
eJ. ,la r
3,
R1M
ffDIfJL Va
®Ly
mn.Ir~m
. lever[ �a
• l�e$x :� wu ♦w
C • oCM
e
®nerwm norF
GPA M KC
IP
� NK .Ra L111[t q¢qP tlLl
eHD®ncr
nm aooc�, rm _
S EEee
w —

.M - M V if[uq tl c4d4itDF
SAciw¢
r rm. a wwa . Ireo ra IYY.I.
WO
40N9R xO fOYT.RS 2 LIGm15.
I. . W II .M U505/m SR 0[SBmI 5/0' m Y rL X9f a w]L®
,G.R I.A. K 51.2 S1OIYx.RA PAP [MM¢
.3 F.
CL YLL u1WS PNS. Y.rtY rP PoiWIL Y.np
��fen
_ Prz wYm I.,R..Im P M w' seYL asMnu slww s aaR
. mvAcr a una nwR. uc rP S.wrW. ao.
m_PaSEp A. ILL q 1. Nt. It RVw.F BBI1iY pilla al R
R-.Yy,IyWi Mala{a IgGli Ia LWra
} Y5. 6 Lm6 W YBLi M.[W Y{a'
RnOA�L 1a0 0'^ ^"- "��
SIrNPCY YWmMI ..OIF. YP M YNYN rlwpW
0 ErnvYun YY xp rlw ua ra awtrt➢ a 1' rvo+ NL<W.
Y'G.wS wMi1W. C4v.WR BBM. MYp
_= L
FILM LIM •AF aM1
([IE "M-1 LC.31
R60D ZONE
(nEvenax-uo•.TI
MOM 26NE •VC
NC HIGHWAY 210 - ISLAND DRIVE
100' RA (ASHµ+-R IRICI
.YY Yro _ 01' °NL
.0
v - - -
rr ,
r
P Af� ♦ 1�3� 1.t } Pa 6a+I,P n.YIm -
..W�ra LP% o.e PARCELa9a.P als
'
155938 59llFt. _
-
•
m S3
`RmmAwALwAoav rwm�Yaa
Ya1W5 Y[. W IR^ MY In wL. . Y.RY9
O �smYs asaYxWa.w MaPY.cw•I rzY also aAs,'
Z� iLL Ya\YRA(0'la�i ��iY xISCWYYZ .MMaT.rtwwllx
•i� 86
m °wa as�seexi .iwwn - u m°LrLc�w .wnr a
O
5jq"AiER MANAGEMENT Ill 'A .
Z Isn co.°n�iwos i.
im+µ max<T .rsA VAI naxF r wr .ala
Yu..u9,m-ro+u ..•la aasr
Mud Iuadnw:
CHARLES F. RIGGS & ASSOCIATES, INC. (c-T3o)
LAND SUBYSYING - CONPBNTIONAL & GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEMS.
r.IND PLINNINI: AM roummRR NAPPINf.
a
IM
Mw Brs MxSm MV[S IPY+ [SRCTL[ WplSr L 00. M M Ya rt.aP.Tlw
n x x a T 1 u[ 9ppm.
OWR.W n[YPIS..E TriL MLx 0901. BOi+-1. Bm
TI
aW M .s. elMl
mmwn .ssa wTs'P1mcMc `mw T u.TI TH i°.... 71 i mI
OW.® PR ro_M r.lVOf P M [WSW YL.aMs SaM OMIa 4p IrI, l.M
wsYrw w,x. r.P+.a m Y.w Pw- o
IIII .w rzv.wY. alovw eema
Yda.Ya wn rxu wsrlrnm xxo .�xmTxx-wYsw w o-as<..
wwr PR uY9 svx.clx wo wwT: 4rnx.IfW Y..m.
aim°Mi sa o%`°`rsi .wr.0 u TM -,I °n.�n°O9ar mi ° CMTI.aa m aua
M art n wouwr .ro wYru..Ia nM xmlY-aru LWP w..�r. s¢rcY.
e eoam YATore TeW .1 MIT. a -IT III mr ..l PP.Tm L.+Lru
4 C/.rzo w -IT[ YW. .T P UxMLL sCIR.10 LK(Y M
Yr w .en.
a W. SY63a YI.n104IlOW5ID rYcaw Y.wIT a xxS00 ry A .u. PLv.rto
um Iree'r°jxemn IT 1.11 rt YW.ma.T Y L.v%. scvL.lm
m w'xuir Y.n1°SSoo-:rzi �cWaP cwlWL s.aAla
ra:eY noa a �' T
WO) .1�a55
An w mm
---------------- _ _--_-_-_--�r
IOT I
M.9.
o e. 2,165.
Td% PAN.' 1.9-91
no23 se rl.
0.253 ACRE5
P,s£LIM/NMYPLAf
nerraP,L�ccHa�nnav
dJ12YPIV{2`> p2 SW.ES
/Y G/�
PARKING AREA DEVELOPMENT PLANS
FOR
TOWN OF NORTH TOPSAIL BEACH
PROPERTES AS PER O.B. 1157, P. 652. 0.8. 1391. P. 816 & D.B. 2W5. P. 465
SITE #3

/I®s.r •r �w.qJ
"—
es.rrr
qw
n0 A[ Y
9YYNi.Y0.11
ND /orDAl ED- NPAD OPEC
a
J
�� � M.r..- .{j•k4iNTT'/l 1 1111 / 1111 1 1 1 U.,
I
Dar�isulM �' yM! .
~yam_ �•A-� �_ _�._ ��__.�_._...__._{__ _� �__r_ _ __ _�.�+�_.__. _.__.�� _� _.. _�.A MNY�
RM O[Y
wu..m.lsr.n
MAKES In RIGGS h ASSOCIATES, INC. Dr ->a)
usa surem)c - wvrrxr/osYD ! cvuc wvnnN/x ++sere.
LMD IGNM/rC a LpWV1Ie 11rMMC
r1Yw.Y.n rY q/..Yw
1MIXYIMM OMkv! Al/W Ru.
TOWN OF NORTH TOPSAH. BEACH
Mpem ... ,in. r. M D a '.W. nY ! o e as R Yf
VURP SA11O 1NMM. 1M4o1. =.".. W. D ..
•D19Y NK! ILC. brPL D! I,.1. P.Ai r Dr. MR. N. W
• . fnXe DTNA/IMG C .'. ~ Dr IM.. P. n.
A DRK
Dr.a rNN.: N.Y. ar
011 w xus
Irr`=1�F— r
.HIYI IOO Y'4� bn Y.� L Ai.
FEW)/ /E it

RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON,
EP 0 2 2014,
—SITE 3
;sociates, Inc. submits this
pertaining to the
s adjoining their current
in Onslow County. The
y existing 26 parking and
, outdoor shower and
dble ramp and dune
one (impervious) and
CDOT street will have
d hours of operation. The
Roger's Bay
ked cross walk will
etation as possible along
)ritz that is used by
;ss for the new parking lot
)ervious surface will be
e of each area to less than
setback to 120' large
new improvements similar
Pluris for sewer. Public
. ine (MHWL) was
The site is sandy and has rapid infiltration from the soil type identified and infiltration testing
performed by Land Management Group. Stormwater will be permitted under a Low Density
Stormwater Permit with sheet flow infiltrating in the sand & pervious gravel adjacent to the ABC
parking. The project timing will be 1-2 weeks with a very short duration of exposed soil. The
short duration of the project and ground stabilization (stone) will prevent sediment from leaving
site.
[1]
DCMvy M� Nt
SEP 0 2 2011

CHARLES F. RIGGS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Land Surveyors
Charles F. Riggs, P.L.S. L-2981 502 NEW BRIDGE STREET Wilmington Office:
James A Lewis, P.L.S. L4562 P.O. Box 1570 101 Sootts trill Loop Road
Kenneth E. Johnson, P.L.S. L-4925 JACKSONVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28541 Wilmington, N.C. 28411
Corporate License (C-730) TELEPHONE: [phone] [phone]
&MAIL: ring¢IandAbizec rr com
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER STATEMENT
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to three tracts (Tax IDs 769-4. 769-4.3, 769-9.1) owned by
Topsail Beach, LLC & RAJDC Holding, Inc, on Island Drive (Hwy 210), Town of North Topsail Beach,
Stump Sound Township, Onslow County, North Carolina. Town of North Topsail Beach leases the land and
proposes to construct as Site 3 a parking lot consisting of impervious and pervious stone surface
complimented with temporary portable restroom structures, hose spigot for rinsing station and one wooden
handicap accessible crossover accesses to the beach area. The existing parking area will be incorporated
into the new development plan to provide uniformed/designated parking spaces. Water service will be
provided by ONWASA. All areas of environmental concern have been evaluated by the North Carolina
Division of Coastal Management and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; these areas have been identified on the
enclosed plans.
The State of North Carolina Division of Coastal Management does not require a response; however the State
does consider no response to be no objection. If you do wish to respond or if you have objections, please
state them in the space below and return this form in the addressed, stamped envelope provided to Charles F.
Riggs & Associates, Inc., P. O. Box 1570, Jacksonville, NC 28541.
Please check the appropriate space for your response.
I have objections to the proposal.
I have no objections to the proposal.
Signature Date
Print or Type Name
Telephone Number
Comments:
DCM WILMiNGTON. NG
SEP 0 2 Z014

Form DCM MP-3
UPLAND DEVELOPMENT
(Construction and/or land disturbing activltias)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
GENERAL UPLAND DEVELOPMENT
a. Type and number of buildings, facilities, units or structures
Weposed-
6' wide beach walk access with handicap ramps
b. Number of Iota or parcels.
o. Density (giie the number of residential units and the units per d. Size of area to be graded, filled, or disturbed including roads,
ace). ditches, etc.
0 64096 SF
e. if the proposed project will disturb more than one ace of land, the f. List the nutariale (such as mad, paver stone, asphalt, or concrete)
Division of Land Resources must reoalve an erosion and to be used for Impervious surfaces.
sedimemaaon control plan at least 30 days before land -disturbing asphalt, ABC stone
activity begins
(p If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion control plan been
submitted to the Division of Land Resources?
SYes ONO [IRA
(ii) If yes, fat the date submitted: in process concurrently
g. Give the percentage of the tract within the coastal shoreline AEC to
be covered by impervious and/or bulk -upon surfaces, such as
pavemerd, building, rooftops, or to be used for vehicular driveways
or parking
0
I. Give the percentage of the entire tract to be covered by Impervious
endfor buk-upon surfaces, such as pavement building, rooftops,
or to be teed for vehicular driveways or parking.
12.0
Describe proposed method of sewage disposal.
Pluris, LLC has community sewer
Describe Iccation and type of proposed discharges to waters of the
state (e.g.. surface runoff, sanitary wastewater, industriet'
commercial effluent, *wash down' and residential discharges).
surface water and "wash dawn" area will infiltrate in the
sand per state stormwater permit
h. Projects that require a CAMA Major Development Permit may also
require a Stormwater Certification.
(q Has a site development plan been submitted to the Division of
Water Quality for review?
SYes ONO ❑NA
(ii) If yes, list the date submitted: _in process Concurrently_
k. Have the facilities described in Item (i) received state or local
approval?
❑Yes SNo ❑NA
If yes, attach appropriate documentation.
m. Does the proposed project include an Innovative stommater
design?
❑Yes ONO ❑NA
If yea, attach appropriate documentation.
RECEI
OCM W� MINGTON, NC
2 26t4 ` o •%wolla

- ISLAND DRIVE
D
o
'HALT -PUBLIC)
LAT: 34-28-49N
w
o
`�
LONG: 77-26-47W
r
J
-----------------
4 ------------
r7
----
— — — — — — —
I
----
PROPOSED
ASPHALT APRON
------�-
-_'— _
- 25 NATURAL
I
�'\ /
\\ 1 ------ -------
25' NATURAL
�VECETARVE BUFFER
VEGETATIVE BUFFER
--�-- N60'30'56"E 648.41'
---
---
_-
_—
--
EASTING77L=
8-- —_ —
VEGETATION
SPAfS
F9 611
TOTAL
B6
2s
--
101 SPACES
\ \
\
----
/
/
'_/
31T
S
-
_
—
———--—t'--I
—-1!4C
——
—
—
-f
__ ,_
—SPACEAS
—i-
ALT
6
—
—
— ---�
-
—
—
• • •
-- \_ -- ` -- ----- .---_r2'--- -- FIILURE-BUA - - - - - - -
PRO
—_ ——ROPEPFFENCE _—_—_----___
i —
�--�� _.� i' � � � .�/ .-� �J/'- TRACT B &--
/ A PORTION OF TRACT A y
M.B. 31, P. 112
D.B. 1394, P. 816
-� = -_=_ _277 _____ t_ -=------- -----, TAX PARCEL: 769-4 __
-- _ - J -= = - - '_ -_ 155938 Sq.Ft. 1----=____
_- «Lw
3_580_ACRES
_----_ice
_
----------i *p+ ---- _----_— _ _ ---- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
_ — . — _ — — — . — �- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — -----�• --- — . — . — . — ... — — . — . — __ -
-s--- ---------

T
•
7I
;Ilk
.`
t

y
syja!^
I \
` Zan

I/
.c

aa.r
)' l
Irk

t
�y� 1;., — �.u,�e� B2 ry292E
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
SEP 0 2 Z014

f ,e/ "- ) I
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
I � �
L �
,0 /
16
si"��'ttr•"""
,SEP 0 2 2014

Lb-

4•7.A it
��t m4ol� , ;44 ,�; �,- $1,

-w --.. ammorr-, � --
e
St Moritz
Sunrise

-4W JNWF6 MkLIU

Ti r w
r„ _0"^BAH jam"
r-

��
— moo,,t.
,m

.00,

A
6-pm
0q�
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON,
SEP 0 2 2014,

PEGGY A. VALENTINE
4110 Island Drive, Unit 301
North Topsail Beach, NC 28460
Cell 919-389-7681
September 23, 2014
Mr. Braxton C. Davis, Director
Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557-3421
Re: North Topsail Beach Parking Lot
Site # 3
Dear Mr. Davis:
I STRONGLY OPPOSE the NTB Site 3 Parking Lot Application, and urge that the application be
denied for following reasons:
1. HIGH DENSITY POPULATED AREA: "Site 3" is at the most densely populated area in the town
of North Topsail Beach.
In a letter written 6/24/13 by NTB Mayor, Dan Tuman, he said there 2500 residential properties
in NTB. Counting 446 owners in Roger Bay and the 32 units in St. Moritz plus adjacent home
owners that is close to 500 owners; 1/5 of NTB owners in this 1/4 mile of HWY 210. The beach
simply can not handle an additional 100 more vehicles with probably 4 people per vehicle.
2. OVERCROWDED: More People on Beach: There is almost no beach at high tide. During the
most populated time on the beach from 10:00 AM through 5:00 PM there is usually a high
tide. We must consider 1 %, hr. before high tide, and 1 %: hr. after high tide (3 hr.) there is
less usable beach. SEE ATTACHED PICTURES.
3. DUNE DAMAGE: Additional people will damage fragile man man dunes. SEE ATTACHED
PICTURES.
4. LOSS OF NATURAL VEGITATION: Natural vegetation is vital to protect man made dune, and
wildlife.
5. DAMAGE TO SEA TURTLES: Normally 2 to 3 nests per year. Already have 2 this year.
6. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY: Already dangerous crosswalk with pedestrians, golf carts, and
vehicles. Adding more TURNING traffic, and additional driveway will be very hazardous.
There was an accident at crosswalk last week end (8/24/2014).
SEE ATTACHED PICTURES.
RECEIVED
OCT 0 6 264
DCWMHDA SOY

THANK YOU for your time and interest. ALL considerations are appreciated.
Sincerely, �
Peggy A. Valentine
RECEMED
OCT 0 i 20
DCM 0W

Print
Date: Mmfty. September 22, 2014 1:45 PM
from: Peppy Valentine <pvaMrMe002®rrc.rr.can>
To:
Subject:
Sent from my iPhone
RECEIVED
OCT 0 6 2014
DCM-MHD CITY

Print
OiY: YnMry.9�ri21U1{1:18 PN
fmm: Pm VOYiYte <WaYMne002gnert.mtn>
To:
eueM�
Sent Pzw .y
RECEIVED
OCT 06 2M
DCM-MHD CITY

Print
Date: Monday
From: Peggy
To:
Subject
Sent from my iPh
RECEIVED
OCT 06 ZM4
DCM-MHD C"

0

Print
Date: Monday, September 22, 2014 146 PM
From: Peggy Valentine <[e-mail]>
To:
Subject:
O-z� �ZA�
RECEIVED
OCT 0 610U
DCM-MHD CITY

0�0'Ad J
Print
Date:
From:
To:
Subject:
Monday, September 22, 2014 143 PM
Peggy Valentine <[e-mail]>
Sent from my iPhone
N
RECEIVED
OCT 0 61014
DCM-MHD CITY

Print
RECEIVED
OCT 0 9 2gl4
DCM-MHD CITY

Print
Date: Monday, September 22, 2014 1:41 PM
From: Peggy Valentine <pvalentine002®nc.rr.com>
To:
Subject:
M
RECEIVED
OCT 0 6 2m
DCM-MHDCf Y

Print
Monday, September 22, 2014
Peggy Valentine <pvalentineO(
RECEIVED
OCT 062M4
DCM-WO SIlly

Print
Date: Monday, September 22, 201410:39 AM
From: Peggy Valentine <[e-mail]>
To:
Subject:
RECEIVED
OCT 0 6 2014
DCM-MHD CITY

Print
Date: Monday, September 22, 2014 1:47 PM
From: Peggy Valentine <[e-mail]>
To.
Subject:
WWWAV
0 JI1
RECEIVED
OCT 0 6 2014
DCM-MHD C[FY

Print
Dale: Monday, Seplernber 22, 2014 1:29 PM
From: Peggy Valentine-pvaientne002@ncrr.00m>
To:
Subject:
Sent from my iPbone
RECEIVED
OrT 0 0 2014
DCM-MHD CITY

N E .
Print
Date: Monday, September 22, 2014 1:29 PM
From: Peggy Valentlne <[e-mail]
To:
RECEIVED
OCT 0 6 7014
DCM•MHD CITY

Print 41
Date: Monday, September 22, 2014 1:30 PM
RECEIVED
Orr 0 6 2014
DCM-MHD CITY

01 R
Print
Date: Monday, September 22, 2014 1:31 PM
From: Peggy Valentine <[e-mail]>
To:
Subject:
Sent from my iPhone \
V
RECEIVED
OCT 0 6 2014
DCM-MHD CITY

Print
Date: Monday, September 22, 2014 1:32 PM
From: Peggy Valentine <[e-mail]>
To:
Subject:
N
RECEIVED
OCT 0 6 20
DCM-MFij➢S7"

�;W;J
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Dillard M. Powell
4110 Island Drive, Unit 301
North Topsail Beach, NC 28460
Dear Ms. Powell:
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for your letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] Internet: www.nodenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity Wanallve Action Employer — Made in part by recycled paper

i �IJ<�•l�Ya'` sall�•+.4L!#"�ia -i. A� �..i . � ....
• 1

E.xNie)r 3

NW,

�' ti �" Aid, ��� � •�`I. !+� 1 Tx '�� � ' ""� � y� �
Z�' �
v + 1 4
AV
10
�1 yi
7 j "
V •Ii�1� �4 FV �+9:
l
31
c
,
t ,'td3�{ t'
•' +
t F
0
1' a
1 k
•�I
�
i II i
Nil
> :f,
AI

DILLARD M. POWELL
4110Island Drive, Unit 301
North Topsail Beach, NC 28460
910-328-7873
Cell919-768-3307
Fax [phone]
[e-mail]
August 25, 2014
Mrs. Deborah Wilson, Manager
CAMA
127 Cardinal Drive
Wilmington, INC 28405
Re: Town of North Topsail Beach
Proposed Parking Lot
Site # 3
Dear Mrs. Wilson:
I am a North Topsail Beach property owner, and STRONGLY OBJECT to the proposed Site # 3
parking lot across Highway 210 from Roger Bay, and adjacent to St. Moritz, on following grounds:
1. LOCATION:
A. SEE EXHIBITS 1 & IA.
B. Adjacent to most densely populated area of NTB.
C. 400+ homes in Rogers Bay across Highway 210. They use this section of beach.
D. Already crowded with Rogers Bay residents.
E. Approximately 700 feet beach. Add 100 vehicles with 2-4 per vehicle = 200-400 plus 1,000
from Rogers Bay.
F. BEACH SIMPLY WILL NOT HANDLE THIS NUMBER.
2. DUNES:
A. SEE EXHIBITS 2 & 3.
B. Surf at high tide already comes to base dune.
C. Dune is man made from previous storms.
D. Face of dunes already largely bare of vegetation.
E. People already intrude onto dunes at high tide.
F. If add 200-400 more people, dunes will be SEVERELY DAMAGED.
G. Even Riggs survey for NTB states MHWL as 1 foot.
3. CBRA:
A. Site in CBRA zone.
B. Therefore, dune protection most important.
C. Natural vegetation should not be removed.
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
AUG ? 2014

4. SITE EVALUATIONS:
A. SEEEXHIBIT4
B. Environmental Evaluation - Upon information and belief, none to date.
C. Traffic Evaluation — DOT representative states there has been none.
D. Safety Evaluation — DOT representative states there has been none.
E. Driveway Request (curb cut) — DOT representative state there has been no request.
F. Note Exhibit 4 where NTB official answers these evaluations have been performed.
5. TRAFFIC:
A. Hazardous —Steady stream of pedestrians, golf carts, and vehicles by 400+ owners, and
visitors from Rogers Bay.
B. Vehicle accident as recent as August 24, 2014 at crosswalk.
C. DOT representative states no traffic study, evaluation, or request to date.
6. ADDITIONAL DRIVEWAY (curb cut):
A. SEEEXHIBIT5
B. Already three driveways within 50 feet (1 on Site, and 2 on Rogers Bay side).
C. Plans (Exhibit 5) indicate another with approximately 300 feet of existing driveway.
D. This is totally unacceptable, hazardous, and unrealistic, and should be rejected.
7. SAFETY:
A. Additional parking, with potential for 200-400 additional people will accelerate an already
unsafe condition along NC 210.
B. Parking Lot will be an invitation for people to be injured and/or harmed.
8. ENVIRONMENTAL:
A. Turtle Nest will be disturbed. Usually have 2 or 3 each year. Already have 2 this year.
B. Natural vegetation will be removed. It should not be disturbed in CBRA zone.
C. This is an already very environmentally sensitive area.
9. SUMMARY:
A. THIS IS WRONG PLACE.
B. THIS IS MOST HIGHLY POPULATED AREA IN NTB.
C. 400+OWNERS, FAMILIES, AND GUESTS CROSSING NC 210 WILL BE HARMED.
D. DUNES WILL BE DAMAGED.
E. ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA WILL BE HARMED.
F. ALTERNATE, MORE APPROPRIATE SITES ARE IN NTB.
Sincerely,
Dillard M. Powell
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
AUG 2 7 2014

DILLARD M. POWELL
4110 Island Drive, Unit 301
North Topsail Beach, NC 28460
910-328-7873
Cell 919-768-3307
Fax [phone]
[e-mail]
June 5, 2014
TO: MayorTuman
SUBJECT: Parking Lot Across Island Drive From Rogers Bay Trailer Park
1 respectfully request, as a North Topsail Beach Taxpayer, written answers to following:
1. What Is current zoning of proposed parking property? at 3. R%
2. Is Conditional Use Zoning required; if so has it been properly approved? NO
3. Is proposed parking property In CBRA zone? YES
4. Is Beach Re -nourishment permitted in CBRA zone? 05
5. Does Town of NTB currently control use of property? %t=
6. Has Town Staff or Aldermen evaluated other property for parking in South NTB7 YE$
7. Has Town Staff or Aldermen considered Scotch Bonnett Pier property? NA
8. Has NTB considered using its powers of eminent domain? ift NA
9. Has NTB consulted NCDOT relative to a Traffic Study? NGpar ISTON l WZ �-
10. If approved will Town of NTB:
A. Have an Environmental Evaluation? P60£ 64 CAwtA
B. Have a Traffic valuation? SrW*6�G $ roV4 'OotAJ:. NO06I
C. Remove current vegetation including tree, shrubs, and grass? �?
D. Remove any sand and soil that is part of current dune? N O
E. What will be done to protect current dune? D�rJg- 0 P_1RVAAx.,r_ 4) FN7
F. Will overnight parking and occupancy be prohibited? y£$
G. Will camping be permitted? O
H. Will recreational vehicles, and camper vehicles be permitted? YA5
I. Will rest room facilities be installed; if so what type; permanent or temporary? Y£5', -Mp
J. WIII parking be permitted on NCDOT Right -of Way?
K. What will be done to control trash and f�[ba e? RfeP-VA'TL
L. What will be done to control noise? gi£ NOl3b OR �tN11vUC £
M. What hours will parking be permitted?
N. What will be done to guarantee the safety of pedestrians, and golf carts crossing street?
CAuTfoufl A y XQK1 S J. pk oolfl RE 5pwir61 tr ry
Since most of these question only require a "yes" or "no"answer, I believe a response from you
within ten days is reasonable.
Sincerely,
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
AUG 2 7 2014

GO
of
F
sq
li
ti
f
S
NWN�ININ..
3�
�
BANGING mu
PF
O WIN— 10
NC HIGHWAY 210 - ISLAND DRIVE
>
100' R/W (ASPHALT-NBUC)
LATE 34-28-49N
. W . ,
LONG: 77-26-47W
_
_
---b'YM.a
.
..
-<`_
_
.±aM rrel
_______
a
a t
vry
-N6090'
6' 200.00E
_
_
___
_ _____
L9 to OZ sasSOG w
40
13.9r
F6nr4sYl
Ltt
a9.9L'
502.4YM'W
L12
MAD
s88OE'47-10
Ex)-.I3>7 5
DCM WECEIVED
ILMINGTON, NC
-AUG 2 7 2014
-------------
MIRE BpR — — — — suM
CHM
—
B NSAN
xu' ... A— _ �_-_ -_ _ /
IYAMA`. mob. �' �A
'Wnsur6..n
\ ® TOTK
- ® -__�=-�'A_ _ A
R
i
To, SPARS _ -
' - ____ _
`
— —.—.
___ __ --
•-��-•••:_ _—�
�_ ___
•iy---- —N ___-'_�,PJNT1Rd BOA_ _
Via;:'
_ v
_. ____c-c1a
•_ L''-._
___ = c—
LWm '' _ /!_ ;•
— _-' - ;"%�' _ ,r -
I / *a M.B. 10. P. 38..
_
-�c- — •�
D.B TT8], P. 662 ",
(:
--
/' TRACT B h
A PORTION OF TRACT A ' �`.. `\—i
_�TAx 48526 q]69-4.3- ``
48526 S Ft. -. it
, yf1 \�,�-'IF4
a _
" M.B. 3t. P. 112 1
_
�_._. 1_i14 ACRES _____"__-,
e�i
I'__
rr,
,a
D. B. 139a. P. Bt6
»�
Why __`-
----_°�—'
_/_ --
_-_` '�_
________
_-- TAX PARCEL: ]69_-
p
_ --'NAM----q
_
155938 S9 Ft _______ _
3.580 ACRES
ES_- —_ -
«r AMINNG.--------------
— --
--
- - - - - -'
---
------------
------
L4
.R MANAGEMENT NOTES
LDf ASTY S1diM PERMIT NUMBER MM 12X
AREA AND LESS MAN 1/2 MILE EROA SA WATERS
SIREIH NAME: ATLAS- OCEAN M CME FEAR RKR PAM
MR: 99-(3)
ASSIC.ATOMSB
YMENT MUST BE IN CgNIANCE AN THE STATE OF HORN
RHEAµ PERMIT - .0 DICING ET ECTW ON AUGUST 3,
ASEWENT RENBONS - SEE DETAILS SHEET
T
)PERTY AREA
4,947 ACRES
TAL WEhAMDS
'ACE
-
pWp ACRES
WA1F16
-
OOW ACRES
AREAµ (PPAA).
215.48T 7
4941 ACRES
LEp . TOT 1T
..
25.BS8 S
CARDS.
WI k SNUOR RES
ow
ION -ASPHALT
823 S'
____ ----- ___________
8
L11 L1 L
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES
L LAND dSNRBUCE . ] m
2 ABBE BY RENSm NPOES PERMIT EFFECTW AUGUST 2, 2011 FOR THE NEW BTABN2ATON ARANTIC CLEAN
ME MALES NO NEW SLOPES STEEPER MAT 3:1 ARE DESIGNED.
1
NexTad uuxTrxAN[r aA.
a CUM AND REMOVE FROM SITE YL TREED ROOM ROOT MAT, ETC. FROM THE AREA ANN
DESIGNATED CLEARING UNITS
S COSTRACTOR 91 LL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANING AND RESTON. TO PRE -CONSTRUCTION
CONDITIONSANY AREAS OUTSIDE TIE PROJECT UNITS THAT MAY WAD1fATENRY BE
DAMAGED WE TO THE FAILURE OF ME EROSION MEASURES BOTH WRING AND MTER LAND
DISROBING ACTNTES HAW BEEN COMPLETED.
p�L
6. CONTRACTION 91ALL CONTINUE TO MAINTAIN PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY ER09CM CONTROLNO�FOi
MEASURES UNTIL RNA. INSPECTION AND APPROYµ BY NCOMt-dNSCN CE ENERGY.
i�N�y
MINES& 4Po LAND RESOURCES, LAND DUALITY SECTION, F REOIFED.
]. HELD CHANGES WAGE MAT NEECT THE PERMITTED EROSION CONTROL PLAN, INCLUDING
STOiMWATER CHANGES SMALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE
M STE IS BROUGHT INTO COMWMCE MM NCDENR-CELRR LAND QUALITY SECTION.

DILLARD M. POWELL
4110Island Drive, Unit 301
North Topsail Beach, NC 28460
910-328-7873
Cell919-768-3307
Fax [phone]
d m Powell @ be I lsouth. net
September 20, 2014
Mr. Braxton C. Davis, Manager
Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557-3421
Re: Town of North Topsail Beach
Proposed Parking Lot
Site # 3
Dear Mr. Davis:
I am a North Topsail Beach property owner, and STRONGLY OBJECT to the proposed Site # 3
parking lot across Highway 210 from Roger Bay, and adjacent to St. Moritz, on following grounds:
1. LOCATION:
A. SEE EXHIBITS 1 & 1A.
B. Adjacent to most densely populated area of NTB.
C. 400+ homes in Rogers Bay across Highway 210. They use this section of beach.
D. Already crowded with Rogers Bay residents.
E. Approximately 700 feet beach. Add 100 vehicles with 2-4 per vehicle = 200-400 plus 1,000
from Rogers Bay.
F. BEACH SIMPLY WILL NOT HANDLE THIS NUMBER.
2. DUNES:
A. SEE EXHIBITS 2 & 3.
B. Surf at high tide already comes to base dune.
C. Dune is man made from previous storms.
D. Face of dunes already largely bare of vegetation.
E. People already intrude onto dunes at high tide.
F. If add 200-400 more people, dunes will be SEVERELY DAMAGED.
G. Even Riggs survey for NTB states MHWL as 1 foot.
3. CBRA:
A. Site in CBRA zone. RECENED
B. Therefore, dune protection most important.
C. Natural vegetation should not be removed.
SEP 22 2P14
DCM-l"'D C:TY

4. SITE EVALUATIONS:
A. SEE EXHIBIT
B. Environmental Evaluation - Upon information and belief, none to date.
C. Traffic Evaluation — DOT representative states there has been none.
D. Safety Evaluation — DOT representative states there has been none.
E. Driveway Request (curb cut) — DOT representative state there has been no request.
F. Note Exhibit 4 where NTB official answers these evaluations have been performed.
5. TRAFFIC:
A. Hazardous — Steady stream of pedestrians, golf carts, and vehicles by 400+owners, and
visitors from Rogers Bay.
B. Vehicle accident as recent as August 24, 2014 at crosswalk.
C. DOT representative states no traffic study, evaluation, or request to date.
6. ADDITIONAL DRIVEWAY (curb cut):
A. SEEEXHIBITS
B. Already three driveways within 50 feet (1 on Site, and 2 on Rogers Bay side).
C. Plans (Exhibit 5) indicate another with approximately 300 feet of existing driveway.
D. This is totally unacceptable, hazardous, and unrealistic, and should be rejected.
7. SAFETY:
A. Additional parking, with potential for 200-400 additional people will accelerate an already
unsafe condition along NC 210.
B. Parking Lot will be an invitation for people to be injured and/or harmed.
8. ENVIRONMENTAL:
A. Turtle Nest will be disturbed. Usually have 2 or 3 each year. Already have 2 this year.
B. Natural vegetation will be removed. It should not be disturbed in CBRA zone.
C. This is an already very environmentally sensitive area.
9. SUMMARY:
A. THIS 15 WRONG PLACE.
B. THIS IS MOST HIGHLY POPULATED AREA IN NTB.
C. 400+OWNERS, FAMILIES, AND GUESTS CROSSING NC 210 WILL BE HARMED.
D. DUNES WILL BE DAMAGED.
E. ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA WILL BE HARMED.
F. ALTERNATE, MORE APPROPRIATE SITES ARE IN NTB.
Sincerely,
Dillard M. Powell
IMMMED
SEP 22 2014
Dem. 2JIiD CTy

43�
wo
o
Z �
1'r' N
:.� m
..
st
ra
L
Ve 1,ar tics
ap
�rvcxac��
-T b ACDt,.f r¢a ty tC, Oryf lM
QMo?(7.7-5vto-r -Z.1oN

vk<
I

FXN.)3Jr g.
DILLARD M. POWELL
4110Island Drive, Unit 301
North Topsail Beach, NC 28460
910-328-7873
Cell 919-768-3307
Fax [phone]
[e-mail]
June 5, 2014
TO: MayorTuman
SUBJECT: Parking Lot Across Island Drive From Rogers Bay Trailer Park
Nvr'r AlvswSRs
i l�a0 NSl Sir wr
W1rN PLAA/A
Nn aA,/v)✓to Aw mrr wi A
YANO rrZ to f'Fl L
S ro o/rLS 7-o..13AT�
I respectfully request, as a North Topsail Beach Taxpayer, written answers to following:
1. What is current zoning of proposed parking property? 1311. R%
2. Is Conditional Use Zoning required; if so has It been properly approved? NO
3. Is proposed parking property In CBRA zone? YES
4. Is Beach Re -nourishment permitted in CBRA zone? YES
5. Does Town of NTB currently control use of property? Nt=
6. Has Town Staff or Aldermen evaluated other property for parking in South NTB? YSS
7. Has Town Staff or Aldermen considered Scotch Bonnett Pier property? N A
B. Has NTB considered using its powers of eminent domain? 1IM WA
9. Has NTB consulted NCDOT relative to a Traffic Study? Nr pOT I TOW yWJL
10. If approved will Town of NTB: ,r
A. Have an Environmental Evaluation? Dp� IN CA"
B. Have a Traffic valuation? S1pJ t4L r_ $1c7pJ 10oOf- /JG0 '1
C. Remove current vegetation including tree, shrubs, and grass? �{?
D. Remove any sand and soil that is part of current dune? N0 6
E. What will be done to protect current dune? 1, 9rag- o (jXk)ffNC,i; £N N7
F. Will overnight parking and occupancy be prohibited? y£$
G. Will camping be permitted? No
H. Will recreational vehicles, and camper vehicles be permitted? VA5
I. WIII rest room facilities be installed; If so what type; permanent or temporary? Y£5, -MP
J. Will parking be permitted on NCDOT Right -of Way? �j
K. What will be done to control trash and g��{{'ba e? ityJA1f.0 4c¢P*�-ts
L. What will be done to control noise? i£J� NO�ss: oR �iN/1AiG£
M. What hours will parking be permitted? "TS!
N. What will be done to guarantee the safety of pedestrians, and golf carts crossing street?
CAUrioil),Oy 51C 5 J. fL0kJft(, sPaf��srbJt, ry
Since most of these question only require a "yes" or "no"answer, I believe a response from you
within ten days is reasonable.
Sincerely,
SEP 22 M4
17C M MIM (Try

o..
Ij
n
i�
AL 5g
2
IMy ble "Ik
b TNP PRIVm I �I� I
A11� ANomm «... ARMNP�Y I
I C
CBANK
NK 8
19
AY v
° NC HIGHWAY 210 —ISLAND DRIVE > uT: JR-IIB-IBN
TMYSAWWNr JBC R/W (A9P15ALT'HNIxCi T7— —47W
_____—_—_____—_______________—_____—_ BIIP�r4� ALf.T.1L1i_X2.►.1[
. s .NETT
yr-T-�_� V1ICI1IIIx
J' N ��
LOT
11
DO
`�1'_`e Yr•\ NTAX PAREL_P)664.3�} I {-I I• �
----------
----------------------------------- .N1M
----- � 7
_____________________
2 MANAGEMENT NOTES
�T YIINADERWAVEF , Ixt
1REA NI E, A MAM tOC M iR A $A WATERS
AEN1 NINE, ATLANTIC DCEMI N CARE iEM PoKR BASIN
M' INS
99-131
tvRunW, sa
LYT'1 YYSr BE x CCYWMICE NCR ME IBM Ci YMM
YDU 11iRENaaN a DID f CRKKM AYgI$E ;ST
R MANAC_ Eb1fy NT RUA
EAT' AREA
A.ND ACRES
ALwIl ANDS
_
D.CO] ACRES
CE WATERS
-
OOOR ACRES
ECT AREA (PAT
215461 W
4.947 ACRES
O . MT& PA • In
- 25,658 7
KM:
B STRIICNRES
D IF
-ASP14ALT
'3 SP
---- - ---- -101 SPACES
-
u I IDA.w I slow"V
uD
Mr
0247`4YW
uI
s.aF
Eexvr45•W
L13
III.IG
SISW4rW
F--XHIF3)i JC
TRACT B
/-- i
PM�Mt lii
.' A PORTION OE TRACT A
T -•h.^ P.
r' M.B. 31, 112
O.B. 1394. P.
816
AX PAR _ _ —
fi9 4
_
w
355�pACRE
--- _ — -- --- —
____ ________________________._
L11
1 1
EROSIONEROSION A&#glff8joN�OL NO�SCON�OL NO S `
t L p51URBM' m
x. ONES BY REMSED MQCI PERMIT EiYE K AIIWST x, MII FOR THE NEW STAEWiANN
ME TRANS& NO NEW SLOPES STEEPER NAT 3:I ARE DONNED.
J. m,CTONWtI,A r�mn�u����r�o�.x
4. CUM AND RETOOK mw SITE ALL VIRUS, BUYS, ROOT MAT, EM PROW THE AREA NMN
DESECRATED CLEARING UNITS
S. CONTRACTOR SNAll BE CMVIRpK MY WAS OuTgY�ME PPRO.OR ECr MWTE NATEYAT YOWNADERTENTLYY BE��
DWAGED DUE TO NE PAIWRE CR NE TRDNW MEASURES ON CASINO AND AFTER IµD
METIIRBING KPMRES "A @p COMPLETED,
B. CWMKTM NINL CWiWUE 1° MANTAM PEbMENT Nq T WARY EROSION CCNTR(A
WASIXES UHRL IN INSPECTION MD APMwN BY N:VEM_nNSCN Ci ENERGY.
NNERAL AND IX0 RESwNCES, UW WMTY BONG, F ROUSES,
R. FBL5) WANGES MADE NAT ASPECT NE COMM SOON CONTROL PLAN, NCLWNO
STORMWAIBAI CIAMCCE SNAIL BE NE ESPWNBMIY DP NE CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE
ME NI[ IS SROINHT NM CCYPLIANCE ON HCARO- ILR LORD WAOTY SECTOR.
ATLAN IC OCEAN
MEVED
SEP 2 2 2014
n

DILLARD M. POWELL
Attorney at Law
Home Address
4110 Island Drive, Unit 301
North Topsail Beach, NC 28460
910-328-7873
Cell 919-768-3307
Fax [phone]
dm powel l cM bellsouth.net
October 15, 2014
Mr. Douglas Huggett
Manager, Major Permits
Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
RE: North Topsail Beach
Parking Site # 3
4030 Island Drive
Dear Mr. Huggett:
I am an adjacent property owner to Parking Site # 3, and representing myself, STRONGLY
OBJECT to the Town of North Topsail Beach application for CAMA Permit that should be DENIED on
following grounds:
FACTS
1. Ocean Erodible Area (See Exhibit 1).
2. High Hazard Flood Area (See Exhibit 1).
3. Proposed ABC Stone Parking Area, 7,697 Sq. Ft. (See Exhibit 1).
A. Divided by 2.0 foot Pervious Gravel (See Exhibit 1).
B. Would disturb approximately 64,096 Sq. Ft. (1.471 acres) of high ground (See Exhibit 1).
GROUNDS FOR DENIAL
1. Incomplete Application:
A. Adjacent property owners not noticed (See Exhibit 2).—Application on Page 4, Section 6
(f) lists St. Moritz Condo Association as an adjacent owner. Please take judicial notice
that condo associations do NOT own property, but common property is owned by unit
owners (See Exhibit 3). Therefore each unit owner at St. Moritz must receive written
notice, return receipt requested, pursuant to DCM MP-1, Section 6 (f).
B. Other Adjacent Property Owners (See Exhibit 4) — Coastal Management states in
September 9, 2014 Report "St. Moritz borders the project area to the North, residential
RECEIVED
OCT If ? "
DCMA4H0(QkTY

properties border the site to the South, the Atlantic Ocean Borders the site to the East,
and NC highway 210 and Rogers Bay Campground border the site to the West". CAMA
Major Development Permit Application Checklist on Page 2, Section Entitled "Adjacent
Property Owner Notification, States "Certified letters (Return Receipt Requested) with
the copies of the permit Application package (permit application forms and appropriate
work plan drawings) must be sent to all adjacent property owners". Based on the CAMA
requirements Rogers Bay Property Owners are adjacent property owners and must be
noticed. Black's Law Dictionary defines adjacent as "Lying near or close to; implies that
two objects are not widely separated, though they may not actually touch".
C. Application Modified (See Exhibit 5) Affidavit of Publication, and original notice posted
each stated "Comments mailed prior to October 3, 2014 would be considered"(See
Exhibit 6) This was modified, as shown by Exhibit 7, to October 22, 2014, without
publishing the required modification in the newspaper.
2. Proposed Parking Area — Affidavit of Publication states "Proposed to install a gravel parking
area", and Coastal Management Field Investigation Report states "Proposed parking area".
Both are singular, indicating one parking area, not two divided by a two foot strip.
3. Two foot pervious gravel strip (See Exhibit 1) —The objective, as stated in Exhibit 1, is to "get
around" the set back limitation for more than 5,000 sq. feet. This is contrary to legislative
and regulatory intent, and I consider it devious, unlawful, and unethical. This project should
be evaluated using 120 feet set back for more than 5,000 square feet.
4. Major Storm Event (See Exhibit 4) — Coastal Management states in September 9, 2014
Report, Page 2, Section 9, "Studies indicate the shoreline in this area could move as much as
260 feet in a major storm event and flood waters could be as much as 14 feet".
5. CBRA Zone —Site is in this flooding and erosion sensitive zone.
6. 15A NCAC 07H .0306 (a)(1) — Development size is defined ------- or total area of footprint for
development other than structures and buildings". Applicant states in application (See
Exhibit 1)that (1) Land Disturbance area is 1.471 acres (64,096 Sq. Ft.); Proposed asphalt
aprons 1,494 Sq. Ft.; Proposed ABC Stone (New Parking Area) 7,697 Sq. Ft.; Proposed Built
Upon Area 25,857 Sq. Ft., and Proposed impervious Surface 12.0%. Application indicates in
Exhibit 1A that "proposal would disturb approximately 64,096 Sq. Ft. (1.471 acres) of high
ground. This should require a setback of 120 feet.
7. Fragile Area —This is a fragile area as defined in N.C.G.S.113A-120(a)(4).
8. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 07H .306(a)(2)(J), and 15A NCAC 07H .303(b)(1)(a) the set back
should be 120 feet.
9. The permit should be denied pursuant to N.C.G.S. 113A-120(a)(9) there are numerous other
sites within the Town that are "a practicable alternative that would accomplish the overall
project purposes with less adverse impact".
10. The following aggravating factors should be considered along with 113A-120.
A. This is most densely populated area of North Topsail Beach.
B. Ocean Erodible Area.
C. Ocean Hazard Flood Area.
D. CBRA Area.
E. Fragile Dune.
F. High Tide to Base Dune.
G. Will disturb approximately 64,096 Sq. Ft. of high ground.
H. Rogers Bay has approximately 425 sites.
I. Safety — Roger Bay has residents of approximately 425 sites crossing busy Highway 210.
RECEIVED
OCT 16 2014
DCM-MHD CITY

J. Traffic — Proposed parking lot will increase traffic causing vehicle and pedestrian traffic
safety problems.
K. Based on CAMA Report, shoreline in this area could move as much as 260 feet in a
major storm event and flood waters could be as much as 14 feet.
1191k=
1. Permit should be denied based on facts and grounds stated above.
2. This site is perhaps the single most undesirable vacant lot site in all of North Topsail Beach
I respectfully request that the Permit be Denied.
cc: Jonathan Howell
CAMA
Attachments
Sincerely,
�����rr-.1�Y/• �m�vC�
Dillard M. Powell
RECEIVED
OCT J $ 7P
DCM-M WD CG9'

A"r rnvru=u lWtKAVU, JUNFACE WILL BE DIVIDED BY NARROW STRIPS OF PERVIOUS
STONE AS TO LIMIT THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EACH AREA TO LESS THAN 5000 SF; EROSION
IS LESS THAN 2 FEET PER YEAR AND MINIMUM SETBACK OF 60 FEET IS USED FOR SMALL
STRUCTURES. EXISTING PARKING IS IMPERVIOUS AND WILL REMAIN UNCHANGED.
2. PERVIOUS RIVER GRAVEL WITH UNIFORMED SIZE BETWEEN 3/4" TO 3" WILL NOT BE INCLUDED
AS BUA.
3. INTENT OF SITE GRADING LANDWARD OF THE 60' SMALL STRUCTURE SETBACK IS "DUNE
REDISTRIBUTION.'
4. PROPOSED RESTROOMS WILL BE TEMPORARY PORTABLE RESTROOMS.
APPROXIMATE MEAN HIGH WATER LINE WAS SURVEYED AS 1' FOOT (NAVD88).
PERVIOUS GRAVEL WILL BE DETERMINED BY STATE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DEFINITION -
SEE NOTE IN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT NOTES.
THE PROJECT IS IN OCEAN ERODIBLE AND HIGH HAZARD FLOOD AREAS AS DETERMINED BY
JASON DAIL OF DCM.
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
EXISTING ASPHALT & IMPERVIOUS GRAVEL m 16666 Sq.Ft.
PROPOSED ASPHALT APRONS m 1494 Sq.Ft.
PROPOSED ABC STONE 76g7 Sac.
PROPOSED TOTAL BUILT UPON AREA/IMPERVIOUS SURFACE 25857 Sq.Ft.
TOTAL LOT AREA m 1 487 Saw
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE a 12.OX
ANTICIPATED DISTURBED AREA: 64096 Sq.Ft.
LENGTH OF SHORE LINE: 921.71'
PROJECT NOTES
1. BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS WERE PERFC
r 2. PARKING AREA DEVELOPMENT PLANS ARE USED FOR
o ti U CONTROL PERMITS AND NCDOT DRIVEWAY PERMIT.
0
3. PROJECT WILL UTILIZE ONWASA WATER FOR POTABLE
c O 4. PROJECT WILL UTILIZE PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE FOF
0
S. PLAN DOES NOT REFLECT FIELD VERIFICATION OF EXI:
CONTRACTOR BY CALLING THE NORTH CAROLINA ONE
LOCATE EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE DIGGING.
6. ELEVATIONS ARE RELATIVE TO NAVD 88.
7. FINAL LANDSCAPING TO BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED
8. PROPOSED RESTROOMS WILL BE A FLOOD PROOF PER
MOBILE RESTROOM BUILDING OR IF INDIVIDUAL UNITS
9. PROPOSED HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBLE WOOD DUNE CF
CODES.
10, PROPOSED GATES TO BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF R/W,
BEACH.
NOW OR FORMERLY
ROGERS BAY CAMPGROUND CO OWNERS
PO BOX 517
SNEADS FERRY, NC 28460
RESIDENTIAL USE
�L
n
h
U
z
.3'
SPEE D
NC HIGHWAY 210 — ISLAND DRIVE 45 Upmo_

mot-agaa3ir 1 it 1 �
Town of North Topsail Beach - Parking Area Project (Site#3)
Date: September 9, 2014
Page Two
The parking area(s) would consist of a combination of ABC stone and gravel. A new driveway connection to an
existing public NCDOT street (Island Drive) would have asphalt aprons, and gates would be installed at the
entrancelexit points to prevent after-hours access. As proposed, the existing parking lot entrance would be
relocated to align with the entrance to the Roger's Bay Campground entrance, which would be located along the
southern end of the project boundary. Here, the applicant proposes to install a 10' x 10' wooden deck with
water spigot and two portable toilets. A second entrancelexit point would be constructed around the central
portion of the property boundary and it too would consist of an asphalt drive with aprons. A gate would also be
installed at this access point. The applicant proposes to leave the existing asphalt drive in place and cover the
area with gravel, with the exception of a small patch of asphalt located along the northern project boundary.
Here, the applicant proposes to remove the existing asphalt and install vegetation to provide a "buffer" between
the proposed parking area and the St. Moritz condominium complex. In addition, a 25' wide vegetative buffer
would remain in place and would separate the proposed parking area(s) from NC Highway 210. The existing
asphalt drive referenced above is approximately 10' (w) x 660' (1) and spans the eastern portion of the property,
just landward of the toe of the dune.
The applicant states that the existing dune crossover near St. Moritz, which is used by Roger's Bay
Campground, would not be incorporated as a pedestrian access walkway for the new parking area and would be
"blocked" by the installation of a vegetated buffer.
In addition to the other security and preservation features, the applicant proposes to install a 4' tall picket fence
around the entire perimeter of the parking area. The fence would be used to prevent foot traffic and any other
unnecessary access up and over the dune system.
Lastly, the applicant proposes to install a handicap accessible beach access walkway along the eastern property
boundary. The walkway would be centrally located and would span from the parking area to the dry sand beach.
Two portable toilets would be installed in the parking area near the entrance to the walkway, as would a trash
receptacle. The walkway would be approximately 6' wide and would span a distance of approximately 90'
across the dune. Steps would be constructed along the southern side of the handicap ramp to allow for
pedestrian access. A flat 6' x 12' platform would be located in the middle of the walkway, which would allow
for viewinglobservation. As designed, the ramp would "zig-zW' in a north/south direction to obtain the
appropriate grade/slope required for ADA accessibility. Adjacent to the handicap access, the applicant proposes
to install a 10' x 10' wood deck with shower spigot for rinsing. The proposed bike storage would be located
directly across from the proposed handicap access, on the opposite side of the gravel drive.
10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS
The applicant's proposal, to construct a parking area with handicap accessible dune crossover (i.e. beach access
walkway) and amenities, would disturb approximately 64,096 sq. f . (1.471 acres) of high ground, all of which
is located in the Ocean Erodible Area of Environmental Concern (AEC). As designed, no portion of the
proposed project, with exception of the beach access walkways, would be located within the 60' setback, as
measured from the First Line of Stable Natural Vegetation (FLSNV). In addition, it does not appear that any
portion of the project, with exception of the beach access walkway, will impact the frontal dune, or dune
vegetation thereon.
The applicant has not yet obtained a Stormwater Permit for the proposed development; however, a
Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan has been approved for this project, under the authorization ONSLO-
2015-021, which was issued on September 4, 2014.
Submitted by: Jason Dail Date: September 9, 2014 Office: Wilmington
RECEIVED
OCT 16 M4
DCM-MHD CRY

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 4 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
1�x t-a I al -r 2
6. Additional Information
In addition to this completed application form, (MP-1) the following items below, if applicable, must be submitted in order forthe applfcation
package to be complete. Items (a) — (0 are always applicable to any majordevefopment application. Please consult the application
Insiruction bookiet on how to properly prepare the required Items below.
-a. A project naralive.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan Naw and cross- sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized will, clearly Indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between wort completed and proposed.
C. A site or location map that Is sufficiently detailed to guile agency personnel unferni ier with the area to the site.
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims tale to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
I. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by cemried mall. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the DMdon of Coastal Management.
Name St. Moritz Condo Association Phone No. -
Address 1630 Military Cutoff Road, WUmington, NC 26403
Name Dugan Elvis Phone No.
Address 3540 W Mill Road, Hatboro, PA 19040
Name WA Phone No.
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permiltee. and Issuing dates.
WA
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, If applicable.
I. Wetland delineation, if necessary.
J. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and irdet areas. (Must be simedby property ma met)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10),1 necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting cornplanoe with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
1 7. Certification and Permission to Enter on Land I
I understand mat any permit issued In response to mis application will allow only the cravelopmem uescntaxt in me appllRitmn.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in Not grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project
1 further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful
�At/othhe best of my knowledge.
Date 8/25/2014 Print Name G ,/ A4451
Signature
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed proweff RECEIVED
pDCM MP-2 Excavation and Pill Information DOW MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
®DCM MP-3 Upland DevelopmenI OCT 16 2014
❑DCM MP-4 Structures Informatitiii, ` DCM-MHD CITY
252-Boa-2808 .. 1•888.4RCOAST -. www.nccoastaimanagement.net

BOON 893 PAGE330
EXHIBIT H
To Declaration
Limited Common Elements
Storage Compartment,:-
,
Each Unit Owner shall be allocated those _
Limited Common Elements, as shown on the
Floor Plans, in the manner met forth below.
Unit
Storage
No,
Compartment
No.
101-A
101
02
103
102-A
10
103-A
105
104-A
10
105-A
201
106-A
201-A
203
202-A
204
203-A
206
204-A
0
205-A
301
206-A
302
301-A
_
30
302-A
304
303-A
305
304-A
306
305-A
401
306-A
402
401-A
403
402-A _
404
403-A
405
404-A
406
405-A
501
406-A
502
501-A
503
502-A
504
503-A
505
504-A
506
505-A
601
506-A
606
RECEIVED
OCT 1 g 2014
DCAA-MHD CpV

Town of North Topsail Beach
Parldng Area Project (Site#3)
Date: September 9, 2014
Page Two
9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The project site is located in North Topsail Beach, at 4030 Island Drive, adjacent to the Atlantic Ocean, in
North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. To get to the site from Wilmington take US HWY 17 N to Old Folkston
Road (State Road 1518 which is approximately 4.0 miles past Holly Ridge). Continue along Old Folkston
Road until you reach the four way stop light at the intersection of Old Folkston Road and NC Highway 210.
Turn right onto NC Highway 210 and travel approximately 3.9 miles. The project site will be located on the left
hand side of the road, just beyond the St Moritz condominium complex and across from Rogers Bay
Campground. St Moritz borders the project area to the north, residential properties border the site to the south,
the Atlantic Ocean Borders the site to the east and NC Highway 210 and Rogers Bay Campground border the
site to the west The project area would span a distance of approximately 820 linear feet along the oceanfront
The current elevation of the project area ranges from approximately 1' at Normal High Water to approximately
8' at Normal High Water. The highground portion of the property is primarily vegetated with native scrub
vegetation and beach grasses including, but not limited to: American Beach Crass, Sea -Oats, Bitter Panicum
and Sea -shore Elder. Historically, the subject property has been used as a parking area by tentants of the Rogers
Bay Campground as well as the general public, and although unimproved, the site is still being utilized for
parking. In addition, two public beach access walkways exist on the site, one on each end of the property.
According to information presented by the applicant, the Town of North Topsail Beach has entered into a 5-year
lease agreement with Topsail Beach, LLC and RAJDC Holdings, LLC (Property owners). The lease agreement
(copy of which is included herein) would effectively expire or terminate on, or prior to March 31, 2019. At
which time, the lease may be renewed or suspended. Permitted uses on the three tract parcel (i.e. subject
property), include the operation of a Town run parking lot or "Parking Facility", as it is referred to in Section
(5) of the lease agreement, with no other uses or purposes without the Landlord's prior written consent
Additionally, Section (8) of the lease agreement states "During the term hereof, the Town will applyfor, payfor
and keep current all permits and licenses required for the lawful operation of the Parking Facilities".
The annual erosion rate for this particular area of North Topsail Beach is 2.0'/year, based on the Division of
Coastal Management's 2011 Annual Erosion Rate maps. Studies indicate the shoreline in this area could move
as much as 260' in a major storm event and flood waters could be as much as 14' deep.
The Town of North Topsail Beach's Land Use Plan classifies this area of North Topsail as Mixed Use Business.
The waters (Atlantic Ocean) of the project site are classified as SB by the NC Division of Water Quality. The
NC Division of Marine Fisheries has NOT designated this area of the Atlantic Ocean as a Primary Nursery
Area, and the waters adjacent to the proposed project are CLOSED to the harvesting of shellfish.
PROPOSED PROJECT:
The applicant is proposing to install a stonetgravel parking area and beach access walkway within the project
boundary. As designed, the gravel parking area would provide parking for up to 101 vehicles (75 proposed
parking spaces + 26 existing spaces). Additionally, the project consists of the construction of a restroom facility,
bike rack, outdoor shower and water spigot and a handicap accessible dune crossover (i.e. structural access
walkway).
RECEIVED
OCT 16 7014
DCM-MHD Clry

Fx-Hla)r 5
5
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF NEW HANOVER
r17-6
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of Said County and State,
Jarimy Springer
Who, being duly sworn or affirmed, according to the law, says that he/she is
Accounting Specialist
of THE STAR -NEWS, a corporation organized and doing business under the Laws of the State of
North Carolina, and publishing a newspaper known as STAR -NEWS in the City of Wilmington
NOTICE OF FILING OF APPLICA TION FOR LAMA MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
The Department of Environmad and Natural Resources hereby gives public notice as required
by NCGS 113A-119h that thefollowing application was submided for a developmeidpermit in
an Area
was inserted in the aforesaid newspaper in space, and on dates as follows:
91721x
And at the time of such publication Star -News was a newspaper meeting all the requirements and
qualifications prescribed by Sec. No. 1-597 G.S. of N.C.
Title: Accounting Specialist
Sworn or-affamed to, and subscri before me this day of
In Testunony Whereof; I have hereunto set my hand and atiuced my o
Yew aforesaid. v /
F n . h' D �. , o .� tyOTA.9
My commission expires I' `l day of _04-b , 20 il0
Upon reading the aforegoing affidavit with the advertisement thereto annexed it is adjudged by the Court that the said
publication was duly and properly made and that the summons has been duly and legally served on the defendant(s).
This day of
zmmv on
Clerk of Superior Court
RECEIVED
RECEIVED
OCT 16 /aft DCM WILMINGTON, NC
DCM-MHD,CtjY

2.1 E
I
F
A A A
� 1: F=
PROJECT:
acen
c Ucean, in, ®nslowr Coun
COMMENTS ACCEPTED THROUGH October 3, 9Q14 I
APPLICANT:
e
For: Town of North Topsail Beach
FOR MORE DETAILS CONTACT
THE LOCAL PERMIT OFFICER BELOW:
NC Div. of Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Dr. Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Jason Dail, Express Coordinator
910.796-7221

7
PROJECT:
c Ucean, in,
7
COMMENTS ACCEPTED THROUGH ?014
APPLICANT:
For: Town of North Topsail Beach Parking Site #3
FOR MORE DETAILS CONTACT
THE LOCAL PERMIT OFFICER BELOW:
NC Div. of Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Dr. Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Jason Dail, Express Coordinator
910-796-7221

DILLARD M. POWELL
Attorney at Law
Home Address
4110 Island Drive, Unit 301
North Topsail Beach, NC 28460
910-328-7873
Cell 919-768-3307
Fax [phone]
[e-mail]
October 15, 2014
Mr. Douglas Huggett
Manager, Major Permits
Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
RE: North Topsail Beach
Parking Site # 3
4030Island Drive
Dear Mr. Huggett:
I am an adjacent property owner to Parking Site # 3, and representing myself, STRONGLY
OBJECT to the Town of North Topsail Beach application for CAMA Permit that should be DENIED on
following grounds:
FACTS
1. Ocean Erodible Area (See Exhibit 1).
2. High Hazard Flood Area (See Exhibit 1).
3. Proposed ABC Stone Parking Area, 7,697 Sq. Ft. (See Exhibit 1).
A. Divided by 2.0 foot Pervious Gravel (See Exhibit 1).
B. Would disturb approximately 64,096 Sq. Ft. (1.471 acres) of high ground (See Exhibit 1).
GROUNDS FOR DENIAL
1. Incomplete Application:
A. Adjacent property owners not noticed (See Exhibit 2). —Application on Page 4, Section 6
(f) lists St. Moritz Condo Association as an adjacent owner. Please take judicial notice
that condo associations do NOT own property, but common property is owned by unit
owners (See Exhibit 3). Therefore each unit owner at St. Moritz must receive written
notice, return receipt requested, pursuant to DCM MP-1, Section 6 (f).
B. Other Adjacent Property Owners (See Exhibit 4) — Coastal Management states in
September 9, 2014 Report "St. Moritz borders the project area to the North, residential
RECEIVED
OCT 161014
DCM-MHD CITY

properties border the site to the South, the Atlantic Ocean Borders the site to the East,
and NC highway 210 and Rogers Bay Campground border the site to the West". CAMA
Major Development Permit Application Checklist on Page 2, Section Entitled "Adjacent
Property Owner Notification, States "Certified letters (Return Receipt Requested) with
the copies of the permit Application package (permit application forms and appropriate
work plan drawings) must be sent to all adjacent property owners". Based on the CAMA
requirements Rogers Bay Property Owners are adjacent property owners and must be
noticed. Black's Law Dictionary defines adjacent as "Lying near or close to; implies that
two objects are not widely separated, though they may not actually touch".
C. Application Modified (See Exhibit 5) Affidavit of Publication, and original notice posted
each stated "Comments mailed prior to October 3, 2014 would be considered"(See
Exhibit 6) This was modified, as shown by Exhibit 7, to October 22, 2014, without
publishing the required modification in the newspaper.
2. Proposed Parking Area —Affidavit of Publication states "Proposed to install a gravel parking
area", and Coastal Management Field Investigation Report states "Proposed parking area".
Both are singular, indicating one parking area, not two divided by a two foot strip.
3. Two foot pervious gravel strip (See Exhibit 1) —The objective, as stated in Exhibit 1, is to "get
around" the set back limitation for more than 5,000 sq. feet. This is contrary to legislative
and regulatory intent, and I consider it devious, unlawful, and unethical. This project should
be evaluated using 120 feet set back for more than 5,000 square feet.
4. Major Storm Event (See Exhibit 4) — Coastal Management states in September 9, 2014
Report, Page 2, Section 9, "Studies indicate the shoreline in this area could move as much as
260 feet in a major storm event and flood waters could be as much as 14 feet".
S. CBRA Zone —Site is in this flooding and erosion sensitive zone.
6. 15A NCAC 07H .0306 (a)(1) — Development size is defined ------- or total area of footprint for
development other than structures and buildings". Applicant states in application (See
Exhibit 1)that (1) Land Disturbance area is 1.471 acres (64,096 Sq. Ft.); Proposed asphalt
aprons 1,494 Sq. Ft.; Proposed ABC Stone (New Parking Area) 7,697 Sq. Ft.; Proposed Built
Upon Area 25,857 Sq. Ft., and Proposed impervious Surface 12.0%. Application indicates in
Exhibit 1A that "proposal would disturb approximately 64,096 Sq. Ft. (1.471 acres) of high
ground. This should require a setback of 120 feet.
7. Fragile Area —This is a fragile area as defined in N.C.G.S.113A-120(a)(4).
8. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 07H .306(a)(2)(J), and 15A NCAC 07H .303(b)(1)(a) the set back
should be 120 feet.
9. The permit should be denied pursuant to N.C.G.S. 113A-120(a)(9) there are numerous other
sites within the Town that are "a practicable alternative that would accomplish the overall
project purposes with less adverse impact".
10. The following aggravating factors should be considered along with 113A-120.
A. This is most densely populated area of North Topsail Beach.
B. Ocean Erodible Area.
C. Ocean Hazard Flood Area.
RECEIVED
D. CBRA Area. OCT 16 2014
E. Fragile Dune.
F. High Tide to Base Dune. DCM-MHD Clio
G. Will disturb approximately 64,096 Sq. Ft. of high ground.
H. Rogers Bay has approximately 425 sites.
I. Safety— Roger Bay has residents of approximately 425 sites crossing busy Highway 210.

J. Traffic — Proposed parking lot will increase traffic causing vehicle and pedestrian traffic
safety problems.
K. Based on CAMA Report, shoreline in this area could move as much as 260 feet in a
major storm event and flood waters could be as much as 14 feet.
SUMMARY
1. Permit should be denied based on facts and grounds stated above.
2. This site is perhaps the single most undesirable vacant lot site in all of North Topsail Beach
I respectfully request that the Permit be Denied.
cc: Jonathan Howell
CAMA
Attachments
Sincerely,
C'ana�;W ;�71�
Dillard M. Powell
RECEIVED
OCT 16 2014
DCM-MHD CITY

IIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT NOTES
PROJECT
ANY PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE WALL BE DIVIDED BY NARROW STRIPS OF PERVIOUS
STONE AS TO LIMIT THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EACH AREA TO LESS THAN
U
NOTE
1. BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS WERE PERFC
5000 SF; EROSION
IS LESS THAN 2 FEET PER YEAR AND MINIMUM SETBACK OF 60 FEET IS USED FOR SMALL
STRUCTURES. EXISTING PARKING IS IMPERVIOUS AND WALL REMAIN
o
>
N
2. PARKING AREA DEVELOPMENT PLANS ARE USED FOR
UNCHANGED.
v
?
CONTROL PERMITS AND NCDOT DRIVEWAY PERMIT.
PERVIOUS RIVER GRAVEL WITH UNIFORMED SIZE BETWEEN 3/4" TO 3" WILL NOT BE INCLUDED
AS BUA.
c
o
Up
3. PROJECT WILL UTILIZE ONWASA WATER FOR POTABLE
INTENT OF SITE GRADING LANDWARD OF THE 60' SMALL STRUCTURE SETBACK IS "DUNE 4. PROJECT WILL UTILIZE PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE FOF
REDISTRIBUTION." 5. PLAN DOES NOT REFLECT FIELD VERIFICATION OF EXI:
OR BY CALLING THE NORTH
PROPOSED RESTROOMS WILL BE TEMPORARY PORTABLE RESTROOMS. LOCATEA EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE DIGG NGOLINA ONE
APPROXIMATE MEAN HIGH WATER LINE WAS SURVEYED AS 1' FOOT (NAVD88). 6. ELEVATIONS ARE RELATIVE TO NAVD 88.
PERVIOUS GRAVEL WILL BE DETERMINED BY STATE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DEFINITION — 7. FINAL LANDSCAPING TO BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED
SEE NOTE IN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT NOTES.
B. PROPOSED RESTROOMS WILL BE A FLOOD PROOF PER
THE PROJECT IS IN OCEAN ERODIBLE AND HIGH HAZARD FLOOD AREAS AS DETERMINED BY MOBILE RESTROOM BUILDING OR IF INDIVIDUAL UNITS
JASON DAIL OF DCM.
9. PROPOSED HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBLE WOOD DUNE CF
CODES.
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
EXISTING ASPHALT & IMPERVIOUS GRAVEL m 16666 Sq.Ft.
PROPOSED ASPHALT APRONS m 1494 Sq.Ft.
PROPOSED ABC STONE 7697 qa.Ft.
PROPOSED TOTAL BUILT UPON AREA/IMPERVIOUS SURFACE 25857 Sq.Ft.
TOTAL LOT AREA 15an� S4 ct
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE a 12.0%
ANTICIPATED DISTURBED AREA: 64096 Sq.Ft.
LENGTH OF SHORE LINE: 921.7V
10. PROPOSED GATES TO BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF R/W,
BEACH.
NOW OR FORMERLY
ROGERS BAY CAMPGROUND CO OWNERS
PO BOX 517
SNEADS FERRY, NC 28460
RESIDENTIAL USE
0
=V
=
Q a
F
0
I �
N
3p�
z
z
SPEED D
NC HIGHWAY 210 - ISLAND DRIVE 45 som,..

Town of North Topsail Beach - Parking Area Project (Site#3) X H ) 2 ) ,1 A
Date: September 9, 2014
Page Two
The parking area(s) would consist of a combination of ABC stone and gravel. A new driveway connection to an
existing public NCDOT street (Island Drive) would have asphalt aprons, and gates would be installed at the
entrance/exit points to prevent after-hours access. As proposed, the existing parking lot entrance would be
relocated to align with the entrance to the Roger's Bay Campground entrance, which would be located along the
southern end of the project boundary. Here, the applicant proposes to install a 10' x 10' wooden deck with
water spigot and two portable toilets. A second entrancelexit point would be constructed around the central
portion of the property boundary and it too would consist of an asphalt drive with aprons. A gate would also be
installed at this access point. The applicant proposes to leave the existing asphalt drive in place and cover the
area with gravel, with the exception of a small patch of asphalt located along the northern project boundary.
Here, the applicant proposes to remove the existing asphalt and install vegetation to provide a "buffer" between
the proposed parking area and the St. Moritz condominium complex. In addition, a 25' wide vegetative buffer
would remain in place and would separate the proposed parking area(s) from NC Highway 210. The existing
asphalt drive referenced above is approximately 10' (w) x 660' (1) and spans the eastern portion of the property,
just landward of the toe of the dune.
The applicant states that the existing dune crossover near St. Moritz, which is used by Roger's Bay
Campground, would not be incorporated as a pedestrian access walkway for the new parking area and would be
"blocked" by the installation of a vegetated buffer.
In addition to the other security and preservation features, the applicant proposes to install a 4' tall picket fence
around the entire perimeter of the parking area. The fence would be used to prevent foot traffic and any other
unnecessary access up and over the dune system.
Lastly, the applicant proposes to install a handicap accessible beach access walkway along the eastern property
boundary. The walkway would be centrally located and would span from the parking area to the dry sand beach.
Two portable toilets would be installed in the parking area near the entrance to the walkway, as would a trash
receptacle. The walkway would be approximately 6' wide and would span a distance of approximately 90'
across the dune- Steps would be constructed along the southern side of the handicap ramp to allow for
pedestrian access. A flat 6' x 12' platform would be located in the middle of the walkway, which would allow
for viewinglobservation. As designed, the rump would "zig-zag" in a north/south direction to obtain the
appropriate gmde/slope required for ADA accessibility. Adjacent to the handicap access, the applicant proposes
to install a 10' x 10' wood deck with shower spigot for rinsing. The proposed bike storage would be located
directly across from the proposed handicap access, on the opposite side of the gravel drive.
10. ANTICIPATED IWACTS
The applicant's proposal, to construct a parking area with handicap accessible dune crossover (i.e. beach access
walkway) and amenities, would disturb approximately 64,096 sq. ft. (1.471 acres) of high ground, all of which
is located in the Ocean Erodible Area of Environmental Concern (AEC). As designed, no portion of the
proposed project, with exception of the beach access walkways, would be located within the 60' setback, as
measured from the First Line of Stable Natural Vegetation (FLSNV). In addition, it does not appear that any
portion of the project, with exception of the beach access walkway, will impact the frontal dune, or dune
vegetation thereon.
The applicant has not yet obtained a Stormwater Permit for the proposed development; however, a
Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan has been approved for this project, under the authorization ONSLO-
2015-021, which was issued on September 4, 2014.
RECEIVED
Submitted by: Jason Dail Date: September 9, 2014 Office: Wilmington
OCT t 61ma
DCM-MHD CITY

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 4 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
E)J1K) i R
6. Additional Information
M addition to this completed application form, (MP-1) fhe following items below, if applicable, must be submitted in order for the application
package to be complete. Items (a) — (0 are always applicable to any ma)ordevelopment application. Please consult the application
Instmctlon booklet on tow to property prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (Including plan view and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present stabs of the
proposed project Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, Geary indicate on maps, plats, drawlrgs to distkguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that Is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate applcation fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
I. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days In
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management
Name St. Moraz Condo Association Phone No.
Address 1630 Military Cutoff Road, Wilmington, NC 28403
Name Duljan Ehils Phone No.
Address 3540 W Mill Road, Hatboro, PA 19040
Name WA Phone No.
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal pennits Issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, per iittee. and Issuing dates.
WA
h. Signed cansullanl or agent authodzation form, if applicable.
1. Weiland delineation, if necessary.
J. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
It A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-101 1 necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of pubic funds or use of pudic lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with he No M Carolina Environmental Polly Act.
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit
I certify that 1 am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further ce" that the information provided in this application is truthful to �thLJe best of my knowledge.
Date 821,%ice5/2014 Print Name tr X64r
Signature
RECEIVED
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed p OCT 1 I
ED
❑DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information ❑DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
®DCM MP-3 Upland Development-.r >
❑DCM MP-4 Structures Informatil;7'
DCM-MHD CITY
252.808-2808 :: 1.888.4RCOA5T :: www.neeaastalmanagement,net

pC.f1?
BOLS �98 BOON 893 FAGE330
011i7 a
ERHIEIT E
To Declaration
Limited Common Elements
Storage Compartment.:
I
Each Unit Owner shall be allocated those
Limited Common Elements, as shown on the
. Floor Plane, in the manner set forth below.
Unit
Storage
Compartment
No.
NO.
101
101-A
102
102-A
103
103-A
104-A .
05
105
- 105-A
106
106-A
201
201-A
202
202-A
203
203-A
204
204-A
205
205-A
206
30
206-A
302
301-A
_
303
302-A
304
303-A
305
304-A
306
305-A
401
306-A
402
401-A
403
402-A J
_ 404
403-A
405
404-A
405-A
501
406-A
502
501-A
50
502-A
504
503-A
506
504-A
0
505-A
601
506-A
606
-,- .-.-...
RECEIVED
OCT 16 70"
DCM-MMD CITY

Town of North Topsail Beach
Parldng Area Project (Site#3)
Date: September 9, 2014
Page Two
9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The project site is located in North Topsail Be" at 4030 Island Drive, adjacent to the Atlantic Ocean, in
North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. To get to the site from Wilmington take US HWY 17 N to Old Folkstone
Road (State Road 1518 which is approximately 4.0 miles past Holly Ridge). Continue along Old Folkston
Road until you reach the four way stop light at the intersection of Old Folkston Road and NC Highway 210.
Turn right onto NC Highway 210 and travel approximately 3.9 miles. The project site will be located on the left
hand side of the road, just beyond the St. Moritz condominium complex and across from Rogers Bay
Campground. St. Moritz borders the project area to the north, residential properties border the site to the south,
the Atlantic Ocean Borders the site to the east and NC Highway 210 and Rogers Bay Campground border the
site to the west The project area would span a distance of approximately 820 linear feet along the oceanfront.
The current elevation of the project area ranges from approximately 1' at Normal High Water to approximately
8' at Normal High Water. The highground portion of the property is primarily vegetated with native scrub
vegetation and beach grasses including, but not limited to: American Beach Grass, Sea -Oats, Bitter Panicum
and Sea -shore Elder. Historically, the subject property has been used as a parking area by tentants of the Rogers
Bay Campground as well as the general public, and although unimproved, the site is still being utilized for
parking. In addition, two public beach access walkways exist on the site, one on each end of the property.
According to information presented by the applicant, the Town of North Topsail Beach has entered into a 5-year
lease agreement with Topsail Beach, LLC and RAJDC Holdings, LLC (Property owners). The lease agreement
(copy of which is included herein) would effectively expire or terminate on, or prior to March 31, 2019. At
which time, the lease may be renewed or suspended. Permitted uses on thethree tract parcel (i.e. subject
property), include the operation of a Town nm parking lot or "Parking Facility", as it is referred to in Section
(5) of the lease agreement, with no other uses or purposes without the Landlord's prior written consent
Additionally, Section (8) of the lease agreement states "During the term hereof, the Town will apply for, pay for
and keep current all permits and licenses required for the lawful operation of the Parking Facilities".
The annual erosion rate for this particular area of North Topsail Beach is 2.0'/year, based on the Division of
Coastal Management's 2011 Annual Erosion Rate maps. Studies indicate the shoreline in this area could move
as much as 260' in a major storm event and flood waters could be as much as 14' deep.
The Town of North Topsail Beach's Land Use Plan classifies this area of North Topsail as Mixed Use Business.
The waters (Atlantic Ocean) of the project site are classified as SB by the NC Division of Water Quality. The
NC Division of Marine Fisheries has NOT designated this area of the Atlantic Ocean as a Primary Nursery
Area, and the waters adjacent to the proposed project are CLOSED to the harvesting of shellfish.
PROPOSED PROJECT:
The applicant is proposing to install a stonelgravel parking area and beach access walkway within the project
boundary. As designed, the gravel parking area would provide parking for up to 101 vehicles (75 proposed
parking spaces + 26 existing spaces). Additionally, the project consists of the construction of a restroom facility,
bike rack, outdoor shower and water spigot and a handicap accessible dune crossover (i.e. structural access
walkway). RECEIVED
OCT 16 7""
DCM-MHD CITY

AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
6
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA Al $ >F.3 / ©N Cd, 4d-
C_ OUNTY OF NEW HANOVER
NOTICE OF FILING OF
APPLICATION FOR CANA MAJOR
The D DEVELOPMENT of PERMIT ent Before the undersigned, a Notary public of Said County and State,
entand Natural Resources hereby fives
113A-119(b) that theifolwingap, Jarimy Springer
pikation was submitted for a de-
velopment rmtt in an Arearn as des!ofEn-
Conurdemthe CAN ACeAccording 9 sa a Who, being duly sworn or affirmed, according to the law, says that he/she is
proposed to install a gravel parking
Accounting Specialist
area and a handicap accessible
beach access walkway with ameni-
ties at.
Atlantic Island i)r,; alvdjdCf psail
of THE STAR -NEWS, a corporation organized and doing business under the Laws of the State of
Beach. Onsiow be examined or A copy of
the application mayay be
North Carolina, and publishing a newspaper known as STAR -NEWS in the City of Wilmington
Dept. of Nat;
NC' E vironment &
NO7TCEOFFILINGOFAPPLICATIONFOR CAMIAMAJOR DEVELOPMENTPERMIT
ral Resources, Div. of Coastal Man-
agement. 127-Cardinal Drive Ext.,
The Deparbnent of Environment and Natural Resources hereby gives public notice as required
WOminggton, North Carolina 28405
i910-796-7215) during normal
by NCGS 113A-119b that thefoUowtng application was submibedfor a develapmentpermltut
business hours.
an Area
nue, Morehead City, NC-28557-
3421. prior to October 3,. 2014 will
be considered in making the permit
decision. Later comments will be
accepted and considered up to the
time of permit decision. Project
modification may occur based on
review and comment by the public
and state and federal agencies.
Notice of the Permit decision in
these matters will be provided upon
written request
was inserted in the aforesaid newspaper in space, and on dates as follows:
91121x
And at the time of such publication Star -News was a newspaper meeting all the requirements and
qualifications prescribed by Sec. No. 1-597 G.S. ofN.C.
Title: Accounting Specialist
Sworn or"a Med to, and subscn before me this _1� day of
In Testimony Whereof I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my4,eiTA
�„
year aforesaid. P D,, o..,..p n i lRY
My commission expires 14'+ day of �, 20 1(0
Upon reading the aforegoing affidavit with the advertisement thereto annexed it is adjudged by the Court that the said
publication was duly and properly made and that the summons has been duly and legally served on the de&mdant(s).
This day of
Clerk of Superior Court
MAEL TO:
RECEIVED
RECEIVED
OCT 16 7014 DCM WILMINGTON, NC
DCM-MHD CITY

i S7 n r G
lit ,,
H U
U � Q
w �
LAMA PE MIcoo
APPLIE FOR
___ _avel _
,scent to the Atiantic ocean, in, ®ns mwou
APPLICANT:
For: Town of North Topsail Beach
FOR MORE DETAILS CONTACT
THE LOCAL PERMIT OFFICER BELOW:
NC Div. of Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Dr. Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Jason Dail, Express Coordinator
910-796-7221

CAMA
APPLI
PROJECT:
� N U
w m
w ^ �
c � i
PE MI
E FOR
-game - - -IN L� JO- 'IN
-
COMMENTS ACCEPTED THROUGH 7014
ja
NC 28541—__
For: Town of North Topsail Beach Parking Site #3
THE LOCAL PERMIT OFFICER BELOW:
NC Div. of Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Dr. xi
Wilmington, NC 28405
Jason Dail, Express Coordinator
910-796-7221

�0
NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Mark Jenkins
PO Box 70
Roseboro, NC 28382
Dear Mr. Jenkins,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
zljl��
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity lAffirmative Actian Employer — Made in pad by recycled paper

To: Johnathon Howell, Deb Wilson
From: Mark Jenkins
Date: October 17, 2014
Re: Opposition to North Topsail Beach Parking Lot @ Rogers Bay
I am writing this letter on behalf of my self and several other property owners at Rogers
Bay — Rogers Bay is a 440 lot camper property where each lot is a deeded property — in
the past we have always rented the property that North Topsail Beach now has rented and
have been stewards of the property for many years. The town has now given the property
owners preferential tax relief and has rented the property out from underneath Rogers
Bay and now has a very large project to turn the undeveloped area into a 100 lot or so
parking lot with all kinds of other developments such as bike paths, road access entries,
bike paths, ect.
There are many reasons this project needs to be terminated or scaled back, and I will list
them in this letter.
RECEIVED
My first question is how can the town make such permanent changes and do the
construction project when they do not own the property? What happens when and if OCT 2 2 70M
Rogers Bay gets the lease on the property again and we once again have it open to DCM-m"o c"
property owners only and not the public — is the town going to remove all of the things
they have installed?
If 100 parking lots are put in like the town desires that will put perhaps a population load
of 200-400 additional people concentrated in this small space based on 2-4 persons per
vehicle. There is not that much beach present for such a large amount of people to be
added to the several hundred Rogers Bay people that will be on the beach
This section of beach is also a very productive and active turtle nesting site, as for some
reason we always have 2-3 nests in the beach area affected by the towns proposal — This
is in a turtle sanctuary zone and with all the additional people that this project will put on
the beach area this nesting site may be harmed just from the human footprint that it will
now be exposed to
In the undeveloped area north of the existing parking lot this is a bird nesting area as
there are tern nests all in the existing foliage — this will also be destroyed under the
current plans the town has
The current sand dunes and the undeveloped area south of the existing parking lot also is
the only thing that we as property owners have to help control any storm surge or ocean
flooding situations — under the towns proposed plans there will be a large reduction in the
sand and vegetation that is currently there — The town is wanting to reduce the flood
control that this area provides — who do we as property owners see when and if any
flooding occurs that could be worsened by the development and removal of the current
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC-
OCT 2 0 2014

sand and vegetation that is now present but would be reduced under the towns plans —
Rogers Bay property owners have large investments in our properties and depend on
every bit of sand and vegetation between our property and the ocean — however under the
towns proposal this barrier would be greatly reduced
I propose a compromise, let the town have the existing parking lot for development as it
will hold up to 50 vehicles, another question I have in regards to the parking lot the town
desires to develop is this, under current town ordinances a parking spot must be a 20 foot
by 8 foot area — does the 100 lot proposed parking lot comply with this requirement?
Another problem that this project will create is the huge parking and traffic problems that
will occur when you have up to 400 vehicles from Rogers Bay owners plus the 100
vehicles from the towns proposed parking additions
Another area of concern is that with up to 100 parking spaces that the town wants to
establish, how will this traffic affect the security of Rogers Bay, we are a private property
and do not want or need trespassers on our property from anyone who parks across the
street
Let the town use the existing parking lot and modify and improve it without having to
destroy or modify the undeveloped parts of the property, this undeveloped parts of the
property is a major part of our flood and over wash control from the ocean, it is a bird
nesting area as well — why and how can it be allowed for the town to put Rogers Bay
property owners land in further jeopardy by destroying any natural flood control that is
present in the undeveloped sections of this property
The town also has proposed gates to be installed on the parking areas but they will not
give any info as to what hours and when the gates will be opened and closed- who is
liable for any injury or damage that will occur in this new parking lot
Who is liable for any damages to any Rogers Bay property that would occur due to a
reduction and or damage to the existing dunes and vegetation that would be removed if
this permit is approved as written? RECENED
I know we all have to share the beach but what the town is wanting to do is way to large a OCT 23 W
project for the small area that we are talking about — let them use and modify the existing DCM•weep
parking lot as 50 or so cars is what this area can withstand — just keep it a simple 50 or so
parking lot without all the permanent things the town wants to build — once again they are
building on land that they do not own — they only have a 5 year lease right now and in 5
years we may get the lease back as we will be trying to do just that — who puts it back
like it was before all the modifications if and when we get the lease back?
I am also very disappointed as to the location of the written notice for CAMA input- the
first time the town tried to place it in an obscure area near the St. Moritz Condo, upon my
objection another one was placed on a telephone pole south of the condo but once again it
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 2 0 2014

was not in a place that could be seen easily — there should have been one placed at the
entrance of the existing parking lot — it has been very obvious that the town has been very
underhanded in the placement of these notices as this comment period was extended due
to the games the town was caught playing.
I would like to know if you have personally made a trip to see the land and property in
question and I would greatly appreciate if you would make a trip yourself to see the
beach area in question, the Rogers Bay Property, the undisturbed vegetation that is now
protecting our property from across the street but may be reduced or removed, the
existing parking lot that the town can develop, and just in general the huge permanent
changes to the are that the town proposes —
We are over 400 taxpaying property owners here at Rogers Bay and we are opposed to
the drastic and very large project that the town is proposing. The area cannot support such
a large human footprint that will be created with 100 parking lots — The nesting birds
cannot, the nesting turtles cannot, and the environment itself cannot
I have also included a dvd of some video I have shot, please take the time to view it
I am also formally requesting that you let me know if you Johnathon, and you Deb have
made a trip to look at this property before it is destroyed and developed by the towns
desire to do such a large and in depth project — Let the town develop the exiting parking
area from the Rogers Bay maintained beach cross walk to the edge of the vegetation
where the portable toilets are now located
Thank your for your considerations in these matters and would you please inform me of
your decisions when they are made as the town will not tell or inform Rogers Bay
property owners of what is going on — this project is a point of contention between the
town and the Rogers Bay property owners so I am counting on you to let me know of
what the decisions are when they are finally made
In closing if you two could I would very much be prepared to meet you both on the site at
a day a time of your setting so I could discuss the particulars and issues that we have in
regards to what the town is wanting to do
Thank you'
Mark Jenkins
PO Box 70
Roseboro, NC 28382
910-525-4825 Home
910-590-4539 Cell
RECEIVED
OCT 22 X9
DCM-MHDCOY
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 2 0 Z014

To: Johnathon Howell, Deb Wilson
From: Mark Jenkins
Date: October 17, 2014
Re: Opposition to North Topsail Beach Parking Lot @ Rogers Bay
I am writing this letter on behalf of my self and several other property owners at Rogers
Bay — Rogers Bay is a 440 lot camper property where each lot is a deeded property — in
the past we have always rented the property that North Topsail Beach now has rented and
have been stewards of the property for many years. The town has now given the property
owners preferential tax relief and has rented the property out from underneath Rogers
Bay and now has a very large project to turn the undeveloped area into a 100 lot or so
parking lot with all kinds of other developments such as bike paths, road access entries,
bike paths, ect.
There are many reasons this project needs to be terminated or scaled back, and I will list
them in this letter.
My first question is how can the town make such permanent changes and do the
construction project when they do not own the property? What happens when and if
Rogers Bay gets the lease on the property again and we once again have it open to
property owners only and not the public — is the town going to remove all of the things
they have installed?
If 100 parking lots are put in like the town desires that will put perhaps a population load
of 200400 additional people concentrated in this small space based on 24 persons per
vehicle. There is not that much beach present for such a large amount of people to be
added to the several hundred Rogers Bay people that will be on the beach
This section of beach is also a very productive and active turtle nesting site, as for some
reason we always have 2-3 nests in the beach area affected by the towns proposal — This
is in a turtle sanctuary zone and with all the additional people that this project will put on
the beach area this nesting site may be harmed just from the human footprint that it will
now be exposed to
In the undeveloped area north of the existing parking lot this is a bird nesting area as
there are tern nests all in the existing foliage — this will also be destroyed under the
current plans the town has
The current sand dunes and the undeveloped area south of the existing parking lot also is
the only thing that we as property owners have to help control any storm surge or ocean
flooding situations — under the towns proposed plans there will be a large reduction in the
sand and vegetation that is currently there — The town is wanting to reduce the flood
control that this area provides — who do we as property owners see when and if any
flooding occurs that could be worsened by the development and removal of the current
RECEIVED
OCT 20 1014
DCM-MHD CITY

sand and vegetation that is now present but would be reduced under the towns plans —
Rogers Bay property owners have large investments in our properties and depend on
every bit of sand and vegetation between our property and the ocean — however under the
towns proposal this barrier would be greatly reduced
I propose a compromise, let the town have the existing parking lot for development as it
will hold up to 50 vehicles, another question I have in regards to the parking lot the town
desires to develop is this, under current town ordinances a parking spot must be a 20 foot
by 8 foot area — does the 100 lot proposed parking lot comply with this requirement?
Another problem that this project will create is the huge parking and traffic problems that
will occur when you have up to 400 vehicles from Rogers Bay owners plus the 100
vehicles from the towns proposed parking additions
Another area of concern is that with up to 100 parking spaces that the town wants to
establish, how will this traffic affect the security of Rogers Bay, we are a private property
and do not want or need trespassers on our property from anyone who parks across the
street
Let the town use the existing parking lot and modify and improve it without having to
destroy or modify the undeveloped parts of the property, this undeveloped parts of the
property is a major part of our flood and over wash control from the ocean, it is a bird
nesting area as well — why and how can it be allowed for the town to put Rogers Bay
property owners land in further jeopardy by destroying any natural flood control that is
present in the undeveloped sections of this property
The town also has proposed gates to be installed on the parking areas but they will not
give any info as to what hours and when the gates will be opened and closed- who is
liable for any injury or damage that will occur in this new parking lot
Who is liable for any damages to any Rogers Bay property that would occur due to a
reduction and or damage to the existing dunes and vegetation that would be removed if
this permit is approved as written?
I know we all have to share the beach but what the town is wanting to do is way to large a
project for the small area that we are talking about — let them use and modify the existing
parking lot as 50 or so cars is what this area can withstand — just keep it a simple 50 or so
parking lot without all the permanent things the town wants to build — once again they are
building on land that they do not own — they only have a 5 year lease right now and in 5
years we may get the lease back as we will be trying to do just that — who puts it back
like it was before all the modifications if and when we get the lease back?
I am also very disappointed as to the location of the written notice for CAMA input- the
first time the town tried to place it in an obscure area near the St. Moritz Condo, upon my
objection another one was placed on a telephone pole south of the condo but once again it

was not in a place that could be seen easily — there should have been one placed at the
entrance of the existing parking lot — it has been very obvious that the town has been very
underhanded in the placement of these notices as this comment period was extended due
to the games the town was caught playing.
I would like to know if you have personally made a trip to see the land and property in
question and I would greatly appreciate if you would make a trip yourself to see the
beach area in question, the Rogers Bay Property, the undisturbed vegetation that is now
protecting our property from across the street but may be reduced or removed, the
existing parking lot that the town can develop, and just in general the huge permanent
changes to the are that the town proposes —
We are over 400 taxpaying property owners here at Rogers Bay and we are opposed to
the drastic and very large project that the town is proposing. The area cannot support such
a large human footprint that will be created with 100 parking lots — The nesting birds
cannot, the nesting turtles cannot, and the environment itself cannot
I have also included a dvd of some video I have shot, please take the time to view it
I am also formally requesting that you let me know if you Johnathon, and you Deb have
made a trip to look at this property before it is destroyed and developed by the towns
desire to do such a large and in depth project — Let the town develop the exiting parking
area from the Rogers Bay maintained beach cross walk to the edge of the vegetation
where the portable toilets are now located
Thank your for your considerations in these matters and would you please inform me of
your decisions when they are made as the town will not tell or inform Rogers Bay
property owners of what is going on — this project is a point of contention between the
town and the Rogers Bay property owners so I am counting on you to let me know of
what the decisions are when they are finally made
In closing if you two could I would very much be prepared to meet you both on the site at
a day a time of your setting so I could discuss the particulars and issues that we have in
regards to what the town is wanting to do
Thank you,
Mark Jenkin
PO Box 70
Roseboro, NC 28382
910-525-4825 Home
910-590-4539 Cell
RECEIVED
OCT 20 1014
DCM-Mw, D C#rY

.` A14
)
��IEWR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
David and Robin Ward
1769 Elon-Ossipee Road
Elon, NC 27244
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Ward,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for your letter email concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major
permit request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to
develop a parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone]Internet: www.nodenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1Atfirmallve Action Employer - Made in pad by recycled paper

1k
Deborah Wilson
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
September 25, 2014
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
OCT 0 7 1014
DCM-MHD CITY
DCM RECEIVED
NG ON, NC
OCT 0 3 2014

With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
With best�'V"
regards,, '�'
'ff"'a 0,4
at �
U&n/, NC a7��14
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
i " %Hll

127 Cardinal Dr Fm.
.,:A:IWihaiffgUx4N.Carolinei2g4O5L,1845'
Dear /►(/�.. �a 1
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
-A&•a4ocal-property owner,,4have several -concerns about -this application:_ - -
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
OCT 0 7 7014
DCM-MHD CRY
DCM RECEIVED
NC
OCT 0 3 2014

With the lack of beach at high tide; all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which' are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors,, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence...
• Additional trash: created by the additional public activity in this area
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide.enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
Withbest regards,
ffakla
-41
101
Eb-r,, , X'C a70.44
RECEIVED
OCT 0 7 'm,4
DCM-dND CITY
RECEIVED
OCM WILMINGTON, NO
OCT 0 3 N14

MCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
John and Pam Talbott
3020 Cricket Road
Fayettville, NC 28306
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Talbott,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for your letter email concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA) major
permit request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to
develop a parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] Internet: www,ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity I Afirmailve Action Employer— Made in part by recycled paper

Deborah Wilson September 25, 2014
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
OCT 8 8 7014
DCM-MHD CRY
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 212014

With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
Withbest egards,����
93 Pel�cQn
3CRA° 6ay
Fay
RECEIVED
OCT 2 2 2014
DCM-MHD COY
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 212014

QDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12,.2015
James Pope
215 Saint Matthews Road
Erwin, NC 28339
Dear Mr. Pope,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for your letter email concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major
permit request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to
develop a parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
414�1
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] Internet: www,ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity Wfirmabve Acton Employer — Made in pad by recycled paper

Deborah Wilson
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
September 25, 2014
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
OCT 08 ?"
DCM-MHO GIV
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 012014

r 'a
With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Th- k you for your consideration.
With best re'v%r&,
i2.9� 5 may c,4-r,p c.2m�-�4
A'oX-- /6 Plu.> yd.gQs.
imianwe pope
215 Saint Matthews Rd.
FXMn„ NC 28339-2417
RECEIVED
nr.T n0 VU
Jji e' ?4 t k ry J IF5 / n 1Pa. pos e 4 b Stty
/�.Cr/7 �Opi.4/Z 6tWc' ( / f Ale iowd
Fv2 JryF 43a�4vh .�T% /5 i�
/iv�e'rte-a T e, t7-4
Topsy4'L ci6Y rar% Z>v %his 4T
/3�F A0ees9 A'26-4 RC2s55 FRI�m Ih6-
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 01 2014

WNW
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Bonnie O'Briant
132 High Pointe Drive
Rincon, GA 31326
Dear Mrs. O'Briant,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for your letter email concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major
permit request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to
develop a parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
— Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifies of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] \ InterneC www.ncdonr.gov
An Equal Oppodunily 1Afirmative Action Employer — Made in part by recycled paper

Deborah Wilson
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
September 25, 2014
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
2FCFIVED
OCT 10 2014
DCM-MHD CITY
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 0 8 2014

With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
r.,ank r- fr- your consideration.
Bonnie O'Briant
132 High Pointe Dr.
RECEIVED
OCT 10 M4
DCM-K'00"
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
,ICT 0 8 2014

e 1
�CDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Donald Summerlin
129 QuarterDeck Road
Rogers Bay Campground
North Topsail Beach, NC 28460
Dear Mr. Summerlin,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for your letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] Internet: www,ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity (Affirmative AcUon Employer— Made in part by recycled paper

f -'s
Deborah Wilson
District. Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
September 25, 2014
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
OCT 08 2014
DCM-MHD Cf1Y
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC

t :Z
With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200400 additional people (24
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activityin this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
With best regards,
1.2 9 C�uar�pr�e�=-k R
RECEIVED
Toy ` "%
N 1—U�3�,, N C— OCT 08 7Rt4
DCM-MHD i:"
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 01 Z014

NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Michael Smith
PO Box 217
Bridgeton, NC 28519
Dear Mr. Smith,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for your letter email concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major
permit request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to
develop a parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail]. .
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] Internet: www,ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1Arfirmative Acton Employer— Made in part by recycled paper

Deborah Wilson -
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
September 25.2014
I am writing this, letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
OCT 10ZN
DCM-MHD,01p1y

With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am.
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (1 O1 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
With best re ,ads, ��qy
--'e4 -/f' .0 •-/�-
RECEIVED
OCl a
Michael Smith
EM PO Box 217
Bndget^ NC 26519

HC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Mary Ann Lee
PO Box 153
Atkinson, NC 28421
Dear Ms. Lee,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity \Affirmative Action Employer — Made in part by recycled paper

• � a
Deborah Wilson September 25, 2014
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
OCT 46 "'A
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 01. 2014

f 16 „
With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
With best regards,
( k o /VC
'23Y�?l
RECEIVED
OCT 06 2n"
DCM-Mi�DC"Y
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 012014

CDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Thomas and Annette Kennedy
403 Raynor Mill Road
Mt. Olive, NC 28365
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Kennedy,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major.Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
/eu�(
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone]nternet: www.nodenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity IAffirmabve Action Employer— Made in pal by recycled paper

Deborah Wilson September 25, 2014
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
s�
5
R lYv
ram• - __ �R\�I� � .F
RECEIVED
OCT 06 814
DCM-MHDQITY
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 01 2014

With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
With best regards,
RECEIVED
OCT 08 2014
7ha=6 8 Ar "'M
DCM-MHO CITY
403 Raynor UU lei
403 Ray
Aft OUve MC 2836
-�•MJ�� �" `� —'
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 012014

Deborah Wilson September 25, 2014
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
OCT 0 8 2014
DCM-MHD CITY
RECEIVED
DCM WILM NGTON, NC

r
With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (24
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
With best regards,
0 Q0
'r,(maa S AnnA&M
1?4, vcedy
4e3 Paynat NiU Rd
m4.Ohv; uc 28365
RECEIVED
OU 0 a 10U
DCM-MHD C1IT}V
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON. NC
OCT 012014

W 4fWA
�C® NR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Marshall Howell
1942 Braswell Road
Smithfield, NC 27577
Dear Mr. Howell,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity IAffirmafive Action Employer — Made in part by recycled paper

. - _0L
Deborah Wilson September 25, 2014
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
OCT 0 A "14
DCM-MHD CITY
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC

With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (24
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (1 O1 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
With best regards,
RECEIVHb
►VJ✓ OCT $ $
DCV+8+1kLtuOR
Mr. Marshall E. HoweR RECEIVED
1942 Braswell Rd. DCM WILMINGTON,
Smithfield, HC 27577-8667
ti

RUI bR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Sylvia Davis
613 College Street
Jacksonville, NC 28540
Dear Ms. Davis,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone]Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal OpportunityIAfirrna dive Action Employer — Made in part by mycled paper

i A "
Deborah Wilson
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
September 25, 2014
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 1 Ol-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
OCT 0 01014
DCM-MHD COY
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OC 1 01 2014

of _..
With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (24
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
With best regards,
2,, j e 4e4'
RECEIVED
OCT 08 2014
DCIVMHD CITY
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 01 2014

'M .
NCDENt
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
S. McClain
1443 Onslow Pines Road
Jacksonville, NC 28540
Dear Sir or Madam,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for your letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed"activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email.at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity lArfinnalive keon Employer— Made in pad by recycled paper

Deborah Wilson September 25, 2014
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845 -
Dear Ms Wilson,
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
OCT 2 8 PM
DCM-MHD COV
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 2420%

With the lack of beach, at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (24
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
,'hank you for your consideration.
With bes.. rds,
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NO
RECEIVED OCT 2420t4
OCT 28 P.M.
DCM-MHD CITY

mlw!

f�
L_ Q - � -,A Q CEess , v
cad at'u. St caC�.cP �w
,1e L'a�rtP
one._
RECENED
�[vQl061 28 pK

FAYE T TEVILLE TJC 2$3
Cnastai Cam ina Area � •
23 OCT M1 4 P fA 3 L
RECEIVEDOcr28 PM.
(J 7
DCM-MHD CITY
'2940-S+S4 6 IIII'IIIIIII"1"'lll'II"III'I 1111"IIIIIiI'I"'IIIII'IIIIII

�Cc1k.Sry.✓ ll�,'l�l.c . �
�SSy-b
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
RECEIVED OC T 2 4 2014 '
OCT 28 PM.
DCM-MHD CITY

Elf
,&1&A
NCB NR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
B. Jones
118 Red Man Road
Jacksonville, NC 28546
Dear Sir or Madam,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for your letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] Internet: www.ncdenF.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1Afirmadive Action Employer — Made in pad by recycled paper

Deborah Wilson September 25, 2014
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
OCT 28 PM,
DCNawD Qh"
DCM RECEIVED
NGTON,
OCT 2 3 2014

With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
With best regards,
RECEIVED
RECEIVED
OV 2 R 'M. DCM WILMINGTON, NC
DCM-MnuCI7V pCT 2 3 2014

A
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Ray Hester
369 McCoy Road
Lexington, NC 27292
Dear Mr. Hester,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for your letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Z,11-ce�
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] \ Internet: www.nodenr.gov
An Equal Oppodunity, 1Af6rmatIve Action Employer - Made in pad by recycled paper

.t %
Deborah Wilson
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
September 25, 2014
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, J have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
RECEIVED
OCT 28 PK
DCM-MHO CITY
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
WILMINGTON. INC
OCT 232014

With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
With best regards,
NA �A �'—>
HESTER
UPHOLSTER
91
IV ci oy Road
ngton, N.C. 27
RECEIVED
OCT 28 p.M,
0cwMh7Dglry
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 2 3 2014

t
MUM
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Joe Sapp
403 Davie Avenue
Winston Salem, NC 27127-6732
Dear Mr. Sapp,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for your letter email concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major
permit request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to
develop a parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed. activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Z_111��
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone]Internet: www.nodenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity IAffinnalive Action Employer— Made in pad by recycled paper

,�A' .
Deborah Wilson September 25, 2014
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
OCT 10 P1
DCM-MHD CITY
DCM WILMINGEON, NC

f. _ 1
With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay..
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
With best regards,
`
403 Dvie Anfe Ave.
Wimma Selem, NC 27127fi732
RECEfVED
OCT r ®11i''.(
DCAA-WqD Cif
RECVVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC

UBENR
North Carolina. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Jennifer Smith
7413 US Highway 70 West
La Grange, NC 28551
Dear Ms. Smith,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for your letter email concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major
permit request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to
develop a parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone]Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity IAffimative Acton Employer— Made in parr by recycled paper

Deborah Wilson
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
September 25, 2014
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed .
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
OCT 2 2 VU
DCM WECEIVED
ILMINGTON, NC
OCT 212014

With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes; which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
you for your consideration.
With ., L. is,
Smith
7413 US Highway 70 W
•;z La Grange, NC 28551
RECEIVED
OCT 2 2 2014
DCM-MHD CITY
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 212014

-r
�4#
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Jill Marino
5714 Linrose Land
Hillsborough, NC 27278
Dear Ms. Marino,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for your letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review: Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
��z�'�
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] Internet: www,nrdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity I Affirmative Acdon Employer- Made in part by recycled paper

Deborah Wilson September 25, 2014
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
I am writing this letter to express my concern in refer roposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North ail Beach as m dean application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan tha cal s for a 101-space king lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground an t Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
OCT 10 209
DCM-MHD CITY
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON. NC
OCT 0 8 2014

With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parkin r 1 Ol cars with
potent ly 200-400 dditional people (2-4
individ icle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safes ��ncemc, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issusurrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police press
• Additio h created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
With best regards,
RECEIVED
OCT 10 29%
DCM-MHD Cm
v^i2%N2� 1—"All
RECEIVED
D WILMINGTON. NC
OCT 0 8 2014

ME ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
James and Brenda McCannon
196 Shagbark Drive
Summerfield, NC 27358-7917
Dear Mr. and Mrs. McCannon,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for your letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In'this case; no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] Internet: www.nGdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer - Made in part by recycled paper

Deborah Wilson
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
September 25, 2014
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
OU 0 7 2014
DCM-MHD CITY
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
0CT O U014

With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
With best regards,
Q�lJ%oe 4Xe- C�7
Brenda McCannon
196 Shagbark Dr.
Summertield, NC 27358-7917
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
0C 1 0 3 Z014

4►
KC-bENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Larry Wayne Medlin
3326 Shoeheel Road
Kenly, NC 27542
Dear Mr. Medlin,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for your letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5=15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone]Internet: www.nodenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity \Afirmalive Action Employer- Made in part by recycled paper

Deborah Wilson
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
September 25, 2014
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
OCT 08 M'
DCWIMHD 4MfN
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 022014

pr
With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
With best regards,
D
DCM-MHD CITY
Mr. Larry Wayne M RECEIVED
3326 Shoeheel Rd DCM WILMINGTON, NC
�N,• Kenly, NC NC 27542 --
OCT 0 2 2014

NCD NR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Bill and Nada McNabb
1023 Andersonwood Drive
Fuquay Varina, NC 27526
Dear Mr. and Mrs. McNabb,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for your letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No.-5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to. the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at Jonathan.Howell@ncdenngov:
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone]Internet: www,ncdenr.gov
An Equal OppodunityIAtfirmalive Action Employer— Made in pad by recycled paper

..4 '�1
Deborah Wilson
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
September 25, 2014
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz),
RECEIVED
OCT 0 6 2014
DCM-M,HD ,Qk1Y
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 022014

With the lack of beach at high tide, allthe umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
With best regards,
Hill ! Asada McNabb
1023 Andersonwood Drive
Fuquay Varina, NC 27526
RECEIVED
OCT 0 Avg
DCM-MmD Cffy
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
I `r

OCROR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Gail Naylor
411 Beaver Dam Drive
Clinton, NC 28328
Dear Ms. Naylor,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for your letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone]Internet: www.nodenr.gov
An Equal Oppodunily 1Affirmative Acton Employer — Made in part by recycled paper '

f . . t
Deborah Wilson September 25, 2014
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECENED
OCT 00 2m,
DCM-MHD1UTv
DCM WILM NIG ON, NC
OCT 0 2 2014

With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
Wiiitth� best regards. 0_
RECEIVED VC
OCT o s iox
DCM-MHD CITY
Ms. Gail T. Naylor
411 Beaver Dam Dr
Clinton, NC 28828 DCM RECEIVED
NC
Futi ttn OCT 022014
Eke sttvn

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Joseph R. Anders
2055 Carr Church Road
Clinton, NC 28328
Dear Mr. Anders,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone]Internet: www.nodenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity I Affirmative Acton Employer— Made in part by recycled paper

Deborah Wilson September 25, 2014
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
OCT 0 6 2M4
DCM-MHD CITY
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 022014

With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
With best regards,
/e?� 6�e-�
/ 4-6 po 6-k S T.
)?Oe5'eK5 13)qv
Joseph R. Anders
2055 Carr Church Rd..
Clinton, NC 28328
RECEIVED
OCT 0 8 1014
DCM-MHD CITY
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OL 1 0 2 2014

W Mkt
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Ernest Antinori
117 Lauren Lane
Sneads Ferry, NC 28460
Dear Mr. Antinori,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Oppodu lly 1 Afirmalive Action Employer —Made in pad by recycled paper

.. c .
Deborah Wilson September 25, 2014
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 1 Ol-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
OCT 0 0 gnu
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, INC
OCT 0 12014

r
With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
With best regards,
/z/V °� ors -Y
1 f 7 o*mow C;Z� .
Jzxt
RECEIVED
OCT 08 ?M4
DCMAoFMD CPY
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC

RU6 R
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Danny and Carol Maples
136 Spence Road
Lillington, NC 27546
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Maples,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty.(20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone]Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity \Affirmative Action Employer — Made in part by recycled paper

op5v6

Deborah Wilson September 25, 2014
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
OCT 14 "
DCU MHA,9�,tTy

With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (1 O1 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration. RECEIVED
With best reg' -4% OCT 14 Z014
DCM-MHD CITY

Rc® NR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Bill Klotz
2533 Corley Wood Drive
Raleigh, NC 27606-4267
Dear Mr. Klotz,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Z—/"�/4Ae&C
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone]Internet: www.ncdencgov
An Equal Oppodually I Affirmative Action Employer— Made in part by recycled paper

Dear Ms. Wilson,
I am writing this letter to voice my serious concerns over the proposed parking lot site 3 in North Topsail
Beach, NC. In addition to the form letter also enclosed, which I am sure you have already read, I wanted
to convey the importance of protecting this stretch of dunes. As stated in the "form" letter, the dunes
have self -repaired and grown over the last 8 years or so. It has been magical to watch and share with
my kids. But, there is little beach left at high tide and the people that the proposed lot would bring
would inevitably damage the dunes and just as important, the turtle nests that are there yearly. I
already have witnessed uncaring individuals ignore signs to climb the dunes for a myriad of reasons,
none of which are acceptable. This area does not have the capacity to handle the large increase of
visitors that would result from this parking lot. Conservation being both my vocation and avocation, and
having been in this area over the last 11 years, I cannot stress enough the negative environmental
impact this proposed parking lot would have. Thank you for your time.
ill Klotz ����
Dill Klotz
2533 Corley Nbotl Dr
Raleigh, NC 276064267
NOLFMCK
CLUB
RECEIVED
OCT 08 794
DCM-MHD CITY

RECEIVED
OCT O81"
DCM-MHD C"

Deborah Wilson
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
September 25, 2014
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
OCT 08
DCM-MML �; IV

M
With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
With best regards,
RECEIVED
OCT 08 2014
DCM-MHD CITY

Deborah Wilson
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
September 2.5, 2014
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
OU 0810'A
DCM-MHD CITY
DCM WILMINGTON, NC

With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200400 additional people (24
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
fisrthcr beach eras.an.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
With pest regards,
RECEIVED
Butler F3mliy Fsum
692 Odom Rd. OCT 08 2014
RECEIVED
Clinton, NC 28328 DCM-MHD Cqy pCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 0 6 2014,

Deborah Wilson September 25, 2014
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845 W
Dear Ms Wilson,
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach: in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
OCT 08 2mA
DCM-MHD C1tY
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
CICi 0 6 2014
d Ue

With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
With best regards,
pS�C-44O/)
D f {A e to e� (.,U l �v o a.4i p%e a)'!e OAi'5 '
h/qh �1'de Mere /5 /lh�/� a�rq lah� �„0-' we
c edl�.,ef
p�tl / 2Ac �t Jr
P) e asp qA&pdo r
OCT 0A?0'1 DCMWIEC IVEON,NC
DCM-MHD COY
OCT 062014,

Deborah Wilson
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
September 25, 2014
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a locatproperty owner, I have several concerns"aboui this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this , r
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
OCT 0 81014
DCM-MHD CITY
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC

With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left).1 am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
With best regards,
RECEIVED
Mc Belinda K. Kinin 4A OCT 08r-'t
165 Geor^clmvne Dr.
Clayton, NC27520 3( M"kDCFFV
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NO
OCT 062014,

Deborah Wilson
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
September 25, 2014
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
OCT 08 M4
DCM-MHD C10M
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON. NC

With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
RECEIVED RECEIVED
Mr.! Mrs. HY Pate.1r. OCT 08 2014 DCM WILMINGTON, NC
1153As" U NE DCM-MHD CX
Revtk NC 2793

BC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Randy and Patty Humphrey
908 Hallsville Road
Beulaville, NC 28518
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Humphrey,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: g19-707-86001Internet: www.nGdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity I AffirmaUve Action Employer— Made in part by recycled paper

Deborah Wilson
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
September 25, 2014
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVEC
Orr 0 7 ?^+4
DCM-Mho .ITV
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 032014
� 1

. - .
With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up io ti,e Junes, wl:ich are also < rr; to nesting turtle and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
With best regards,
dy & Patty Humphrey
908 HallsVille Rd.
Beulaville, NC 28518
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
UCT 0 3 Z014

AS R
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Sandra Hoffman
PO Box 723
Sneads Ferry, NC 28460
Dear Ms. Hoffman,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review'agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone]Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer— Made in part by recycled paper

•ti.
Deborah Wilson
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
September 25, 2014
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
OCT 10 20"
DCM-MHD OT'y
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 0 8 2014

With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
f. rther beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
With best
_regards,
s� tfJ�`^^
cr
Ms. Sandra:Hoftmaon
Po Box 723
.. 3nnd, Ferry,646-0723
RECEIVED
OCT t 0 1014
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 0 8 2014
DCM-MHD CITY

t. a
®�QQ�� /i
Q�1�d®r1E WR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Joey Graham
967 Breazeale Avenue
Mt. Olive, NC 28365
Dear Mr. Graham,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final 96tion is taken on a permit application: In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone]Internet: wvvw.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity IAffirmative Action Employer — Made In part by recycled paper

Deborah Wilson September 25, 2014
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington; N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there arc only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz). f e ° P I r 5l ee pi hi9 Cn 3e4 C-k a // N14' �ft
„,KS
NortECEso Fle F©✓
,eta- -�7 /'kZ IderRIVED
4 akaf R7k M :!� sJ OCT 0 0 11i14
DCM-MHD CITY
RECEIVED
_ DCM WILMINGTON, NC
/ /%� 5 0 C T 01 2014
9/l reaoP� Froh�- lAe Tocc)ni %akc over

d . . .
With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes. which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
fundiei ix ach erusiun.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration. c�
With best regards,
919� ��0'Flo�S I oY
RECEIVED
OCT 08 7014
/� _ �A//�/', r � m An o DCM_M..•��C9F^Y
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 012014

ODERR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Jim and Sandra Gams
101 North Court
La Grange, NC 28551
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Garris,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review, agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 545 for the proposed activity. A -copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone]Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative AcUon Employer— Made in part by recycled paper

X
Deborah Wilson
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
September 25, 2014
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
OU 14 2014
DCM-MHD CITY

With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200400 additional people (24
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
With best regards,
a
3 00-x V,
M& &ns�� L
101 North
� La Grange,, NC 2 �
RECEIVED
OCT 14 2014
DCM-MHD CITY

4
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Mary Lou Garner
113 Meadowlark Road
Goldsboro, NC 27534
Dear Ms. Garner,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review' agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] Internet: www.nodenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity IAfirmatve Acton Employer — Made in part by recycled paper

Deborah Wilson September 25, 2014
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845 ^
Dear Ms Wilson,
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
OCT 2 2 2014
DCM-MHD COV
DCM WILM NIGTON, INC
OCT 17 2014

s- -
With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting hurtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion..
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration. 11 -M
With best regards,a�
RECEIVED
DCM-MHD CRY
I �(� fJt Q [)i^- 1 L1L¢A`Y�CZ I i tQiil4 %trt,CA I AON, NC
't'v U OCT 17 2014

Deborah Wilson
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
September 25, 2014
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominiurr! property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
OCT 22"U
DCM**OV."
DCM WECEIVED
ILMINGTON,
OCT 17 2014

With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on err du.^.es and wildlife, r nd rcsat in
further beach.erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
'Thank you for your consideration.
With best regards,
I � I 111
1
r� jI I
rn -40-L 'Bax P1v
113 (t a dt9 t.w La Ad- led
�Clgl�.�.t-c7 � yl • C , p75'3
Zr 6 w Iwv RECENED
OCT 2 2 20M
Cu,U-Cry-n''HD cm
C� CL � J� p RECEIVED
Qlt.(xti}lQ.� DCM WILM
INGTON, NC
OCT 172014

c► A4Q
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Mr. Colic Doss
3741 Richlands Hwy.
Jacksonville, NC 28540
Dear Mr. Doss,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] k Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1Affinnalive Action Employer — Made in pan by recycled paper

Deborah Wilson September 25, 2014
y4 District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed RECEIVED
parking area and St. Moritz).
OCT 06 2P
DCM-MHD 0TV
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC

With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife. ,s
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (24
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
With best regards,
RECEIVED
RECEIVED
Mr. Colie Doss OCT 06 1014 DCM WILMINGTON, NC
3741 Richlands Hwy
Jacksonville NC 28540-7190 DCM-MHD C" OCT 01 2914

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Bob Crowder
4110 Island Drive
North Topsail Beach, NC 28460
Dear Ms. Crowder:
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for your email concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
1110-e�
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Oppodunlly I Affirmative Action Employer — Made in part by recycled paper

From: Robert Crowder[mailto:robertcrowderrr(o)gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 8:56 AM
To: Wilson, Debra
Subject: Parking Lot #3
These are pictures of the two turtle nests this summer where the additional 101 carloads will be walking.
Thank you for hearing our story and protecting the wildlife.
Sincerely,
Bob Crowder
Homeowner St. Moritz
4110 Island Drive
f ma vL f
�,,6,+Ccz,Ae,r rr®

From: Robert Crowder rmailto:robertcrowderrrCoOgmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 8:50 AM
To: Wilson, Debra
Subject: Proposed Parking Lot #3
Debra,
This is where the current walk way to the beach is located from Roger's Bay Campground. This picture was taken a little after high tide
yesterday morning. As you can see, there is simply not enough beach to accommodate an additional 101 carloads of visitors.
1 am opposed to anything that puts our dunes and natural habitat at risk. Our Town needs to be a better steward of our dune line. I hope
CAMA will reject any permit for additional parking at Lot #3. Under separate email, I am forwarding pictures of the turtle nests in this
same area.
Thank you for your concern for our island
Best regards,
Bob Crowder
4110 Island Drive
North Topsail Beach
JC

CHARLES A RIGGS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Land Surveyors
Charles F. Riggs, P.L.S. L-2981 SW NEW BRIDGE STREET W- tmgb3a Off=
James A. Lewis, P.L.S. L -4562 P.O. Box 1570 101 Scorer His Loop Koad
Kenneth E Johmson, P.LS "921 JAOMMIUM, NORTH CAROUNA 2t1541 WiWiostoa N C 29411
Corporate License (C-730) TELEPHONE: [phone] [phone]
E-MAIL: rieaslandfalbizee.rr.com
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER STATEMENT
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to three tracts (Tax IDs 769-4. 70 4.3, 769-9.1) owned by
Topsail Beach, LLC & RAJDC Holding, hic. on Island Drive (Hwy 2101 Town of North Topsail Beach,
Stump Sound Township, Onslaw County, North Carolina. Town of North Topsail Beach Imes the land and
proposes to construct as Mk 3 a parking lot consisting of impervious and pervious stone surface
complimented with temporary portable rest room str ucmres, hose spigot for rinsing station and one wooden
handicap accessible crossover accesses to the beach area. The existing perking am will be incorporated
into the new development plan to provide uniformcd/dwigoated perking spaces. Water service will be
provided by ONWASA. All areas of environmental concern have been evaluated by the North Carolina
Division of Coastal Management and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; these areas have been identified on the
enclosed plans.
The State of North Carolina Division of Coastal Management does not require a response; however the State
does consider no response to be no objection. If you do wish to respond or if you have objections, please
state them in the space below and return this form in the addressed, star ped envelope provided to Charles F.
Riggs & Associates, Inc., P. O_ Box 1570, Jacksonviilq NC 28541.
Please check the appropriate space for your response.
%/ ) i have objections to the proposal.
I have no objections to the proposal.
Re� P, Lk—
nn r
bLPrrI a IiY I W��r l l]1D
Print or Type Name
914-�'SlD-b5 to 919-722-Ob9l
Telephone Number
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
AUG 2 6 2014

CHARLES K RIGGS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Land Surveyors
Charles F. Riggs, P.L.S. L-2981 SM NEW BRIDGE STREET Wcom, Him
oop
Janes A Lewis, PI-S. L44562 P.O. Box 1570 dal Snarls Hiu Loop erred
Kmneah 8. Jomisal, P.L.S. IA925 JACKSONvILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28541 Wih ko^ N-O. 28411
CoMola c License (C-730) TELEPHONE- [phone] [phone]
E-MAIL: r1RgW=dQbizecar.com
ADIACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER STATEMENT
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to three tracts (Tax IDs 7(09-1.769-4.3, 769-9.1) owned by
Topsail Beach, LLC & RAJDC Holding, Inc. on Island Drive (Hwy 210)� Town of North Topsail Beach,
Stump Sound Township, Onslow County, North Carolina. Town of North Topsail Beach leases the land and
proposes to construct as Site 3 a parking lot consisting of impervious and pervious store surface
complimented with temporary portable restroom structures, hose spigot for rmsmg station end one wooden
handicap accessible crossover accesses to the beach area. The existing parking area will be incorporated
into the new development plan to provide uniformed/designated parking spaces. Water service will be
provided by ONWASA. All areas of environmental concern have been evaluated by the North Carolina
Division of Coastal Management and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; these areas have boar identified on the
enclosed plans.
The State of North Carolina Division of Coastal Managanant does not require a response; however the State
does consider no response to be no objection. If you do wish to respond or if you have objections, please
state them in the space below and return this form in the addressed, stamped envelope provided to Charles F.
Riggs & Associates, Inc., P. O. Box 1570, Jacksonville, NC 28541.
RECEIVED
Please check the appropriate space for your response.
( �) I have objections to the proposal. S E P 12 2014
( ) I have no objections to the proposal.
DCM-MUD CITY
Signature Date
I
ko8 f � �, l� 1 W�Gr— y�� �I i)jaNl� i7UdVv/
Print or Type Name
911- F20 - ]55 - 1 b/l
Telephone Number
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
SEP 0 92014

4%
2/23/14
Mr. Braxton Davis
Div. Manager CAMA
400 Commerce Ave.
Morehead City, NC 28557-3421
Dear Mr. Davis,
This letter is in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in North Topsail Beach, N.C.and the
application to CAMA for a major permit for a 101-spaces parking lot on the leased property
across from Rogers Bay Campground, with the St Moritz, a private oceanfront condominium
property to the north, and duplexes to the south.
As a local homeowner, I have several concerns about this application:
(1) This area already has a large number of surrounding residents/property owners, including
more than 420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground, 32 unit owners at the St
Moritz to the north, and approximately 30 additional duplex residences (— 30) to the
south of the proposed parking lot;
(2) There is limited beach, only a few feet(3 to 6), at high tide;
(3) A proposed public parking for 101 vehicles would potentially add 101400 (14 persons
per vehicle) that require access to this limited beach;
(4) The beach is also home to nesting turtles and susceptible to significant erosion;
(5) The lack of beach at high tide with the space requirements of that many additional people
is expected to result in unintentional damage to the dunes and wildlife, and accelerate
erosion;
(6) Traffic congestion in an already densely populated location is expected to be an
additional issue; and
(7) There are significant safety concerns for pedestrians from Rogers Bay who need to cross
the street to access the beach.
I am very concerned that the size of this parking lot is not acceptable as proposed and needs to be
reduced to more reasonable proportions to allow access to our beautiful beach while preserving it
for future enjoyment.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
With kind regards,
Robert (;�er
RECEIVED
OCT 01 2014
DCM-MHD CITY

.09

9/25/14
Mr. Douglas Huggett
CAMA
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557-3421
Dear Mr. Huggett,
This letter is in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in North Topsail Beach, N.C.and the
application to CAMA for a major permit for a 101-spaces parking lot on the leased property
across from Rogers Bay Campground, with the St Moritz, a private oceanfront condominium
property to the north, and duplexes to the south.
As a local resident/homeowner, I have several concerns about this application:
(1) This area already has a large number of surrounding residents/property owners, including
more than 420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground, 32 unit owners at the St
Moritz to the north, and approximately 30 additional duplex residences (— 30) to the
south of the proposed parking lot;
(2) There is limited beach, only a few feet(3-6ft), at high tide(no room for 50 — adults).
(3) A proposed public parking for 101 vehicle would potentially add 101-400 (1-4 persons
per vehicle) that require access to this limited beach;
(4) The beach is also home to nesting turtles and susceptible to significant erosion;
(5) The lack of beach at high tide with the space requirements of that many additional people
is expected to result in unintentional damage to the dunes and wildlife, and accelerate
erosion;
(6) Traffic congestion in an already densely populated location is expected to be an
additional issue; and
(7) There are significant safety concerns for pedestrians from Rogers Bay who need to cross
the street to access the beach.
I am therefore very concerned that the scope of this parking is not acceptable as proposed and
needs to be reduced to more reasonable proportions to allow access to our beautiful beach while
preserving it for future enjoyment. Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerer
RobertCrowder
4110 Island Dr.
North Topsail Beach, NC
:L,b M 0
RECEIVED
SEP 2 9 ?"
DCM-MHD CITY

BC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
William and Susan Davis
PO Box 299
Lumber Bridge, NC 28357
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Davis,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for your letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone]Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity IArfirmaliveAction Employer — Made in part by recycled paper

Deborah Wilson
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr. Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
We are writing to share our concerns about the proposed parking lot site 3
in North Topsail Beach, NC, of which the Town has made an application to
CAMA for a permit for a proposed plan that provides for a 101 space
parking lot on the property across from Rogers Bay Campground.
It is our opinion that this stretch of beach is already subject to as much
traffic as it can bear without becoming an issue for environmental, safety,
and natural beauty concerns.
There are 400+ sites in the campground, 32 owners in the St. Moritz
condominium. It would seem that this is enough traffic to put into this area,
if care was taken by those enjoying. To allow an additional 100-300
additional persons with their vehicles would more than tip the scales toward
irresponsible stewardship of this property.
We have been visiting this stretch of beach for a number of years and have
so enjoyed doing so because of its natural beauty and lack of development,
but this past summer was disheartened to see an increased amount of
pressure being placed on the beach, the dunes, and the habitat.(Since the area
was leased and placed open to the public)
My greatest concerns though have been environmental by large.
The beach side of the dunes are becoming trampled by people, evident by
footprints up and down the face of the dunes, vegetation broken down etc.,
even very close to the stay off the dunes signs.
Trash and debris amounts have gone up 200%. Shoes, flip flops, clothing,
bottles, rope, toys, fishing gear and line left on the beach. We don't have to
tell you what a detriment this to the birds, fish, turtles and wild life in
general.
Speaking of turtles, we have had the pleasure of seeing dozens of turtle nests
being placed, monitored and cared for by those who do this, on this beach.
We questioned why here,and was told because of the natural gentle slope of
these dunes, and the lower than usual amount of traffic that these nests were RECEIVED
placed here. If these parking spaces are opened, we fear these nests will be
disturbed or not place here altogether. OCT 2 2 20W
Traffic congestion this past season was no doubt the worst in NTB. DCM-MHD cm
we do not understand the wisdom of NTB wanting to place this much
additional traffic(human and vehicular) in an area that is already full.
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 2 0 2014

We respectfully submit that this permit should be denied on the
environmental, debris and traffic grounds listed. We sure there are more but
these are very important.
While we agree that we should provide access to our coast to the public, I
just feel that this particular one is a bad fit. Having been up and down this
island, we have seen many vacant and uncongested stretches of coast that
would be much better suited for this purpose than is parking lot site 3, in
North Topsail Beach.
For whatever it is worth, there are 500+ organizable, registered voters, who
reside all across the state, owning property in the campground, and 90%
opposing this project.
We wish people would be better stewards of our planet, but until they are we
rely on you, Ms Wilson, and CAMA to do it for them by denying this
permit.
Thank you for your careful consideration of this very important matter.
iRe ectf illy ours,
illiam) L nd Susan W. Davis
RECEIVED
OCT 2 2 7W
DCM-MHD CITY
William L. Davis
PO Box 299 RECEIVED
Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 2 0 2014

NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Kay Annette Gurley
PO Box 1009
Sneads Ferry, NC 28460
Dear Mrs. Gurley,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone]Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Oppommity (Affirm dive Action Employer — Made in pal by recycled paper

Deborah Wilson
District Manager CAMA � (OT °P014
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
I am .writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
. condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
OCT 10 2MM
DCM-MHD CITY
DCM RECEIVED
NC

With the lack of beach at high tide; all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pic vres),back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dun" and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Roger; Bay.
• Possiblesexun issues'for-surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional-t wh created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed RECEIVED
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scoff 10 NU
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
caMcjof the available ecosystem and will.ultimately damage what we are strivingso mainta r% M-MHD C"Y
Thank you for your consideration.
With best retards,
�1 aEt It -btu �-" #
IS-" -, (d gay J';L'C � 'To to 0(
A X�'�
CM WILMILMINGTON, NC
�- OCT 082014
_ _
1-v �I1��

RECEIVED
OCT 10 M4
DCM-MHD CRY

RUM
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Gene Hart
Hart Investigations, Inc.
PO Box 1401
Mansfield, OH 44901
Dear Mr. Hart,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone]Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal OppodunityIAfirmative Action Employer— Made in part by recycled paper

GENE HART
4110 Island Drive #305
N. Topsail Beach, North Carolina 28460
October 13, 2014
Deborah Wilson
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
I am writing in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in North Topsail Beach, N.C. and the
application to CAMA for a major permit for a 101-spaces parking lot on the leased property
across from Rogers Bay Campground, with the St Moritz, a private oceanfront condominium
property to the north, and duplexes to the south.
As a local resident/homeowner, my wife and I have several concerns about this application:
(1) This area already has a large number of surrounding residents/property owners, including
more than 420 plus property owners in Rogers Bay Campground, 32 unit owners at the St
Moritz to the north, and approximately 30 additional duplex residences (— 30) to the
south of the proposed parking lot;
(2) There is limited beach, only a few feet, at high tide;
(3) A proposed public parking for 101 vehicle would potentially add 100-400 (1-4 persons
per vehicle) that require access to this limited beach;
(4) The beach is also home to nesting turtles and susceptible to significant erosion;
(5) The lack of beach at high tide with the space requirements of that many additional people
will result in unintentional damage to the dunes and wildlife, and accelerate erosion
which we have witnessed;
(6) Traffic congestion in an already densely populated location is expected to be an
additional issue; and
(7) There are significant safety concerns for pedestrians from Rogers Bay who need to cross
the street to access the beach. Since the Police Department is relatively small, they have
not been able to provide any special attention to traffic control in the area nor violations
occurring on the beach involving littering, fishing around swimmers and alcohol in
bottles being consumed.
RECEIVED RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 20 1n1A OCT 15 Zag
DCM-MHDD C"

I am, therefore, very concerned that the scope of this parking is not acceptable as proposed and
needs to be reduced to more reasonable proportions to allow access to our beautiful beach while
preserving it for future enjoyment.
Thank you for your consideration.
Wi st regards,
Gene Hart
HART INVESTIGATIONS, INC.
P.O. BOX 1401
MANSFIELD, OHIO 44901
RECEIVED
OCT 20 M4
DCIMMCaVV
DCM W LMING ON, NC
cc, 15 2014

GENE HART
4110 Island Drive #305
N. Topsail Beach, North Carolina 28460
October 13, 2014
N.C. Division Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive
Wilmington, North Carolina 28405
To Whom It May Concern:
I am writing in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in North Topsail Beach, N.C. and the
application to CAMA for a major permit for a 101-spaces parking lot on the leased property
across from Rogers Bay Campground, with the St Moritz, a private oceanfront condominium
property to the north, and duplexes to the south.
As a local resident/homeowner, my wife and I have several concerns about this application:
(1) This area already has a large number of surrounding residents/property owners, including
more than 420 plus property owners in Rogers Bay Campground, 32 unit owners at the St
Moritz to the north, and approximately 30 additional duplex residences (— 30) to the
south of the proposed parking lot;
(2) There is limited beach, only a few feet, at high tide;
(3) A proposed public parking for 101 vehicle would potentially add 100-400 (1-4 persons
per vehicle) that require access to this limited beach;
(4) The beach is also home to nesting turtles and susceptible to significant erosion;
(5) The lack of beach at high tide with the space requirements of that many additional people
will result in unintentional damage to the dunes and wildlife, and accelerate erosion
which we have witnessed;
(6) Traffic congestion in an already densely populated location is expected to be an
additional issue; and
(7) There are significant safety concerns for pedestrians from Rogers Bay who need to cross
the street to access the beach. Since the Police Department is relatively small, they have
not been able to provide any special attention to traffic control in the area nor violations
occurring on the beach involving littering, fishing around swimmers and alcohol in RECEIVED
bottles being consumed.
OCT 201tl14
DCM-MHD CO
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 15 2014

I am, therefore, very concerned that the scope of this parking is not acceptable as proposed and
needs to be reduced to more reasonable proportions to allow access to our beautiful beach while
preserving it for future enjoyment.
Thank you for your consideration.
With st regards,
Gene Hart
HART INVESTIGATIONS, INC.
P.O. BOX 1401
MANSFIELD, OHIO 44901
RECEIVED
nr.T 20 2014
DCM-MHD CITY
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 15 2014

GENE HART
4110 Island Drive #305
N. Topsail Beach, North Carolina 28460
October 13, 2014
Braxton Davis
Director DCM
400 Commerce Avenue
Moorehead City, N. Carolina 28557
Dear Mr. Davis,
I am writing in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in North Topsail Beach, N.C. and the
application to CAMA for a major permit for a 101-spaces parking lot on the leased property
across from Rogers Bay Campground, with the St Moritz, a private oceanfront condominium
property to the north, and duplexes to the south.
As a local resident/homeowner, my wife and I have several concerns about this application:
(1) This area already has a large number of surrounding residents/property owners, including
more than 420 plus property owners in Rogers Bay Campground, 32 unit owners at the St
Moritz to the north, and approximately 30 additional duplex residences (— 30) to the
south of the proposed parking lot;
(2) There is limited beach, only a few feet, at high tide;
(3) A proposed public parking for 101 vehicle would potentially add 100-400 (1-4 persons
per vehicle) that require access to this limited beach;
(4) The beach is also home to nesting turtles and susceptible to significant erosion;
(5) The lack of beach at high tide with the space requirements of that many additional people
will result in unintentional damage to the dunes and wildlife, and accelerate erosion
which we have witnessed;
(6) Traffic congestion in an already densely populated location is expected to be an
additional issue; and
(7) There are significant safety concerns for pedestrians from Rogers Bay who need to cross
the street to access the beach. Since the Police Department is relatively small, they have
not been able to provide any special attention to traffic control in the area nor violations
occurring on the beach involving littering, fishing around swimmers and alcohol in
bottles being consumed.
RECEIVED
OCT 151n+a
DCM-MHD CITY

I am, therefore, very concerned that the scope of this parking is not acceptable as proposed and
needs to be reduced to more reasonable proportions to allow access to our beautiful beach while
preserving it for future enjoyment.
Thank you for your consideration.
Z
est regards,
Gene Hart
RECENED
V i6VA
DCMOHD CI(`!

NCDENB
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Robert Gillett and Edward Cramer
429 Pelican Drive
Selma, NC 27576
Dear Sirs,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for your letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state- and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
G 44+
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] Internet: www.nodeni.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 AffirmaUve Action Employer— Made in pad by recycled paper

September 22, 2014
NC Div. of Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Dr. Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Att: Jason Dail
The application by the Town of North Topsail Beach to establish a gravel parking area with handicapped beach
access at 4030 Island Drive will result in an environmental disaster. The planned added load of 100 plus vehicles
and the people each vehicle will add to this already densely populated area will have a negative impact on the
dunes, the beach, the Loggerhead sea turtles and the birds and vegetation in the area.
Included in this letter are pictures of the bathers on the beach. That picture was taken when approximately 50
cars occupied the undeveloped parking area. The proposed parking area
is in an area which has been designated as an Area of Environmental
Concern. This is an area of natural importance and is already heavily
populated. The surrounding properties at the St. Moritz and Rogers Bay
already use the adjoining beach area. Rogers Bay contains 442
individually "family owned" sites with an average occupancy of three to
four persons per lot on a peak holiday. The St Moritz consists of thirty
five (35) condos. There is no other area on the beach which can claim it
is as densely populated.
Another serious fault with the current plan is that there is essentially no beach left at high tide as the following
picture shows. The second picture provides a view of how the beach looked when there were only 50 cars
parked in the open field where the proposed parking lot will be constructed. Please note the amount of beach
which is available at high tide.
aid the water.
We believe that North Topsail Beach has neglected to consider the established population in this area and
should reduce the capacity of its parking facility to fifty or less cars but still provide the other facilities it has on
the submitted plan. A modified plan which limits parking to 50 cars would reduce the amount of the vegetation
removed and would limit the number of occupants on the beach. The proposed plan in its present state will
result in a massive environmental overload. Where will an additional fifty car -loads of people go? On the dunes!
RECEIVED
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT n 7 '""I
DCM-M H,D C61y

This area is part of an area which the Coastal Resources Commission (CRC) designated as a "Area of
Environmental Concern."An Area of Environmental Concern, or AEC, is an area of natural importance: It may be
easily destroyed by erosion or flooding; or it may have environmental, social, economic or aesthetic values that
make it valuable to our state.
Traffic (vehicular and foot) across busy HWY 210 creates a major hazard because of the busy activity from the
parking site to the businesses and from the Rogers Bay site to the beach. We have observed 10 to 12 cars
stopped on HWY 210 waiting for the traffic to cross the crosswalk during peak periods on Memorial Day. The
North Topsail Beach plan attempts to reduce the traffic congestion by adding an entrance but this does not
adequately address the issue of the cross traffic from cars, pedestrians and golf carts. There are no traffic lights
or lighting for the crosswalk and no lighting in the parking areas.
Note the density of on comng Iraffk
We strongly support the Towns efforts to provide access, and particularly handicapped access, and the use of
our public beaches. We all must however, also accept that we have a responsibility to protect the fragile
environment in these areas while taking care of the community's needs and do our planning accordingly.
Rogers Bay
Property Owners
Edward Cramer
[e-mail]
2A.'e- t
A-J "
Robert Gillett
[e-mail]
Y
Robert Gillett
429 Pecan Dr.
Selma, NC 27576
RECEIVED
OCT 07 "
DCWMHfD 5: Ry
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 032914

....�
AP
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Ronald and Margaret Coy
4110 Island Drive, Unit 304
North Topsail Beach, NC 28460
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Coy,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for your letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A. copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone]Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal OpportunityIAKrmative Action Employer— Made in part by recycled paper

September 21, 2014
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C.The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-spaces parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below,is already densely populated with more than 420
property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are also
additional duplex residences (-- 30) to the south of the proposed parking lot.
RECEIVED
OCT 20 gnu
DCM-MHD C"
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 15 2014

With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the right). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (24
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes andwildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already denselypopulated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
With best regards,
RECENED
OCT 20 1014
DCM-MHD CtrY
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 15 20%

LLi
9/23/14
%Y/hH-a.�LL'C. ,,I-3-ens✓ �Y�'�/i
This letter is in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in North Topsail Beach, N.C.and the
application to CAMA for a major permit for a 101 -spaces parking lot on the leased property
across from Rogers Bay Campground, with the St Moritz, a private oceanfront condominium
property to the north, and duplexes to the south.
As a local resident/homeowner, I have several concerns about this application:
(1) This area already has a large number of surrounding residents/property owners, including
more than 420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground, 32 unit owners at the St
Moritz to the north, and approximately 30 additional duplex residences (— 30) to the
south of the proposed parking lot;
(2) There is limited beach, only a few feet, at high tide;
(3) A proposed public parking for 101 vehicle would potentially add 100400 (14 persons
per vehicle) that require access to this limited beach;
(4) The beach is also home to nesting turtles and susceptible to significant erosion;
(5) The lack of beach at high tide with the space requirements of that many additional people
is expected to result in unintentional damage to the dunes and wildlife, and accelerate
erosion;
(6) Traffic congestion in an already densely populated location is expected to be an
additional issue; and
(7) There are significant safety concerns for pedestrians from Rogers Bay who need to cross
the street to access the beach.
1 am therefore very concerned that the scope of this parking is not acceptable as proposed and
needs to be reduced to more reasonable proportions to allow access to our beautiful beach while
preserving it for future enjoyment
Thank you for your consideration.
With best regards,
RECEIVED
OCT 2 0 2014
DCM-MHD CRV
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, MC
OCT 15 2014

9/23/14
This letter is in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in North Topsail Beach, N.C.and the
application to CAMA for a major permit for a 101-spaces parking lot on the leased property
across from Rogers Bay Campground, with the St Moritz, a private oceanfront condominium
property to the north, and duplexes to the south.
As a local resident/homeowner, I have several concerns about this application:
(1) This area already has a large number of surrounding residents/property owners, including
more than 420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground, 32 unit owners at the St
Moritz to the north, and approximately 30 additional duplex residences (— 30) to the
south of the proposed parking lot;
(2) There is limited beach, only a few feet, at high tide;
(3) A proposed public parking for 101 vehicle would potentially add 100-400 (1-4 persons
per vehicle) that require access to this limited beach;
(4) The beach is also home to nesting turtles and susceptible to significant erosion;
(5) The lack of beach at high tide with the space requirements of that many additional people
is expected to result in unintentional damage to the dunes and wildlife, and accelerate
erosion;
(6) Traffic congestion in an already densely populated location is expected to be an
additional issue; and
(7) There are significant safety concerns for pedestrians from Rogers Bay who need to cross
the street to access the beach.
I am therefore very concerned that the scope of this parking is not acceptable as proposed and
needs to be reduced to more reasonable proportions to allow access to our beautiful beach while
preserving it for future enjoyment.
Thank you for your consideration. RECEIVED
With best regards, OCT t F ?flit
✓)�)k � C�� � )� DCM-MHDCITY
uiC aHw-A)(,
t tau
V4-. / 2IC 2Y1&d
03A1303b

September 21, 2014
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C.The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-spaces parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below,is already densely populated with more than 420
property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are also
additional duplex residences (— 30) to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
- OCT -1F1411
DCMvH00"

With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the right). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes andwildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already denselypopulated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
With best regards,
J
'i G
r�,,_.2,., u;
RECEIVED
OCT 15 ZM
DCM-MHD CJTV

A
RDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Lou and Charlie Campbell
4110 Island Drive, Unit 201
North Topsail Beach, NC 28460
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Campbell,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for your letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity I Affirmative Action Employer— Made in part by recycled paper

;C25 • R
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Florence Burleson
4110 Island Drive, Unit 505
North Topsail Beach, NC 28460
Dear Mrs. Burleson:
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for your letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone]Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1Affirmative Action Employer — Made in pad by recycled paper

Deborah Wilson 25 August 2014
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-spaces parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also additional duplex residences (— 30) to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVEr
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
AUG 2 8 Z014

With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
With best regards,
Florence Burleson, Unit 505 St. Moritz
DCM
NO
AUG 2 8 2014

X"4*
f�CdMHR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Harold and Josie Bradberry
4110 Island Drive, Unit 103
North Topsail Beach, NC 28460
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Bradberry,
Donald R. van der Vaal
Secretary
Thank you for your letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone]Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Acdon Employer- Made in part by recycled paper

JOSIE BRADBERRY
4110 Island Drive, Unit 103
North Topsail Beach, NC 28460
September 30, 2014
Mr. Braxton Davis
Director Coastal Management
44 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
Re: North Topsail Beach
Proposed Parking Lot
Site # 3
Dear Mr. Davis:
I am a contiguous property owner and STRONGLY OPPOSE the proposed Site # 3 parking lot, at
North Topsail Beach on the following grounds:
1. LOCATION — Most densely populated area of North Topsail Beach, with 400 plus homes at
Rogers Bay, 32 at St. Moritz, plus numerous large rental units.
2. DUNE — Fragile man made dune, with limited vegetation on ocean side.
3. BEACH — High tide water line almost to dune.
4. PEOPLE — Beach simple will not have adequate space for 200-400 more people from 100
vehicles.
5. DAMAGE TO DUNE — People will be on fragile dune, eroding ocean side face of dune.
6. SEA TURTLES — 2 to 3 nest at this location each year; already 3 nests this year.
7. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY — Additional vehicles turning into and out of lot will create major
traffic and safety issues; especially with pedestrians, golf carts, and vehicles crossing
Highway 210 from Rogers Bay. We have already had accident at this location this year.
8. VEGETATION - Natural native vegetation will be damaged and/or removed.
9. ALTERNATE LOCATIONS - There are many more suitable alternation locations in North
Topsail Beach.
Please DENY the application of North Topsail Beach for Site # 3.
Thank you.
RECEIVED
OCT 02 7W
DCM-MHJ.CIT`r
Sincerely,
Josie Bradberry
lelye
/ru
A

HAROLD BRADBERRY
4110 Island Drive, Unit 103
North Topsail Beach, NC 28460
September 30, 2014
Mr. Braxton Davis
Director Coastal Management
44 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
Re: North Topsail Beach
Proposed Parking Lot
Site # 3
Dear Mr. Davis:
I am a contiguous property owner and STRONGLY OPPOSE the proposed Site # 3 parking lot, at
North Topsail Beach on the following grounds:
1. LOCATION — Most densely populated area of North Topsail Beach, with 400 plus homes at
Rogers Bay, 32 at St. Moritz, plus numerous large rental units.
2. DUNE — Fragile man made dune, with limited vegetation on ocean side.
3. BEACH — High tide water line almost to dune.
4. PEOPLE — Beach simple will not have adequate space for 200-400 more people from 100
vehicles.
5. DAMAGE TO DUNE — People will be on fragile dune, eroding ocean side face of dune.
6. SEA TURTLES— 2 to 3 nest at this location each year; already 3 nests this year.
7. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY — Additional vehicles turning into and out of lot will create major
traffic and safety issues; especially with pedestrians, golf carts, and vehicles crossing
Highway 210 from Rogers Bay. We have already had accident at this location this year.
8. VEGETATION - Natural native vegetation will be damaged and/or removed.
9. ALTERNATE LOCATIONS - There are many more suitable alternation locations in North
Topsail Beach.
Please DENY the application of North Topsail Beach for Site # 3.
Thank you.
RECEIVED
Since�relyl,, Arry
HaId Bred �Aj
OCT 0 2 1014
DCM-MHD CITY

HAROLD BRADBERRY
4110 Island Drive, Unit 103
North Topsail Beach, NC 28460
September 30, 2014
Mrs. Deborah Wilson
CAMA
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
Re: North Topsail Bcuch
Proposed Parking Lot
Site # 3
Dear Mrs. Wilson:
I am a contiguous property owner and STRONGLY OPPOSE the proposed Site # 3 parking lot, at
North Topsail Beach on the following grounds:
1. LOCATION — Most densely populated area of North Topsail Beach, with 400 plus homes at
Rogers Bay, 32 at St. Moritz, plus numerous large rental units.
2. DUNE — Fragile man made dune, with limited vegetation on ocean side.
3. BEACH — High tide water line almost to dune.
4. PEOPLE — Beach simple will not have adequate space for 200-400 more people from 100
vehicles.
5. DAMAGE TO DUNE — People will be on fragile dune, eroding ocean side face of dune.
6. SEA TURTLES — 2 to 3 nest at this location each year; already 3 nests this year.
7. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY — Additional vehicles turning into and out of lot will create major
traffic and safety issues; especially with pedestrians, golf carts, and vehicles crossing
Highway 210 from Rogers Bay. We have already had accident at this location this year.
8. VEGETATION - Natural native vegetation will be damaged and/or removed.
9. ALTERNATE LOCATIONS - There are many more suitable alternation locations in North
Topsail Beach.
Please DENY the application of North Topsail Beach for Site # 3.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
RECEIVED HoM6lB 6
1
1V
Or.T 06 2014
RECEIVED
DCM-MHD CITY DCM WILMINGTON, NC

RECEWD
OCT 08 2014
DCM-MHD CITY

JOSIE BRADBERRY
4110 Island Drive, Unit 103
North Topsail Beach, NC 28460
September 30, 2014
Mrs. Deborah Wilson
CAMA
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
Re: North Topsail Beach
Proposed Parking Lot
Site # 3
Dear Mrs. Wilson:
I am a contiguous property owner and STRONGLY OPPOSE the proposed Site # 3 parking lot, at
North Topsail Beach on the following grounds:
1. LOCATION — Most densely populated area of North Topsail Beach, with 400 plus homes at
Rogers Bay, 32 at St. Moritz, plus numerous large rental units.
2. DUNE — Fragile man made dune, with limited vegetation on ocean side.
3. BEACH — High tide water line almost to dune.
4. PEOPLE — Beach simple will not have adequate space for 200-400 more people from 100
vehicles.
5. DAMAGE TO DUNE — People will be on fragile dune, eroding ocean side face of dune.
6. SEA TURTLES — 2 to 3 nest at this location each year; already 3 nests this year.
7. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY — Additional vehicles turning into and out of lot will create major
traffic and safety issues; especially with pedestrians, golf carts, and vehicles crossing
Highway 210 from Rogers Bay. We have already had accident at this location this year.
8. VEGETATION - Natural native vegetation will be damaged and/or removed.
9. ALTERNATE LOCATIONS - There are many more suitable alternation locations in North
Topsail Beach.
Please DENY the application of North Topsail Beach for Site # 3.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
RECEIVED Josie Bradberry
OCT 0 6 1A14
DCM#THD CITY
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC

RECEIVED
OCT P F "ll
DCM-b �ITY

•r
NC DENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Elmer Atkins
4110 Island Drive, Unit 503
North Topsail Beach, NC 28460
Dear Mr. Atkins,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for your letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. .Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone:[phone] k Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity (Affirmative Action Employer —Made in part by recycled paper

ELMER ATKINS
4110 Island Drive, Unit 503
North Topsail Beach, NC 28460
September 3, 2014
Mrs. Deborah Wilson
CAMA
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
Re: North Topsail Beach
Proposed Parking Lot
Site # 3
Dear Mrs. Wilson:
I STRONGLY OPPOSE the proposed Site # 3 parking lot, at North Topsail Beach on the following
grounds:
1. LOCATION — Most densely populated area of North Topsail Beach, with 400 plus homes at
Rogers Bay, 32 at St. Moritz, plus numerous large rental units.
2. DUNE — Fragile man made dune, with limited vegetation on ocean side.
3. BEACH — High tide water line almost to dune.
4. PEOPLE — Beach simple will not have adequate space for 200-400 more people from 100
vehicles.
5. DAMAGE TO DUNE — People will be on fragile dune, eroding ocean side face of dune.
6. SEA TURTLES — 2 to 3 nest at this location each year; already 2 nests this year.
7. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY —Additional vehicles turning into and out of lot will create major
traffic and safety issues; especially with pedestrians, golf carts, and vehicles crossing
Highway 210 from Rogers Bay. We have already had accident at this location this year.
8. VEGETATION - Natural native vegetation will be damaged and/or removed.
9. ALTERNATE LOCATIONS - There are more suitable alternation locations in North Topsail
Beach.
Please DENY the application of North Topsail Beach for Site # 3.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
SEP 0 8 2014

,.�.,.,.�_
roCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Jeanette and John Mohan
507 Olive Street
Wilmington, NC 28401
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Mohan,
Donald R, van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for your letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
/ G�¢
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone]Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity IAffirmaGve Acton Employer — Made in part by recycled paper

Deborah Wilson
CAMA
127 Cardinal Drive
Wilmington, NC 28405
Dear Deborah Wilson,
We own 2 lots at Rogers Bay at North Topsail Beach. Directly across from Rogers Bay
is.a parking lot which was used only by property owners from Rogers Bay but became
public parking this summer. Since this has become public parking, the parking lot is
overcrowded, there is no longer room for property owners to park there, the beach is
almost inaccessible to us since it is overcrowded with other people, the trash cans are
overflowing and the beach is littered with trash that people just leave on the beach when
they depart. When it was just the Rogers Bay property owners on the beach, we took
pride in the beach and parking lot and did not leave the litter or trash in the parking lot.
There are at least 430 camper lots in Rogers Bay so just with this amount of people also
trying to enjoy the beach and park you can just imagine the chaos. There are frequently
cars lined up on the street which is also a hazard especially when trying to cross the street.
Please consider this problem and change it back from public parking to private parking
for Rogers Bay campers.
Th ou for your time and consideration.
Jeanette and John Mohan
507 Olive St.
Wilmington, NC 28401
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
AUG 2 9 2014

Deborah Wilson
CAMA
127 Cardinal Drive
Wilmington, NC 28405
Dear Deborah Wilson,
We own 2 lots at Rogers Bay at North Topsail Beach. Directly across from Rogers Bay
is a parking lot which was used only by property owners from Rogers Bay but became
public parking this summer. Since this has become public parking, the parking lot is
overcrowded, there is no longer room for property owners to park there, the beach is
almost inaccessible to us since it is overcrowded with other people, the trash cans are
overflowing and the beach is littered with trash that people just leave on the beach when
they depart. When it was just the Rogers Bay property owners on the beach, we took
pride in the beach and parking lot and did not leave the litter or trash in the parking lot.
There are at least 430 camper lots in Rogers Bay so just with this amount of people also
trying to enjoy the beach and park you can just imagine the chaos. There are frequently
cars lined up on the street which is also a hazard especially when trying to cross the street.
Please consider this problem and change it back from public parking to private parking
for Rogers Bay campers.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Jeaaand John Mohan
507 Olive St.
Wilmington, NC 28401
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
AUG 2 9 2014

=11
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Robert X. Robertazzi
1 Claridge Drive PH 11
Verona, NJ 07044
Dear Mr. Robertazzi,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for your letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
met: www.ncdenr.gov
pbyer- Made in part by recycled paper
Z
Z
O- 1 Z

'ep".26,2914
Braxton Davis
Director DCM
400 Commerce Ave
Moorehead City, N.
Dear M
Carolina 28557-3421
This letter is in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in North Topsail Beach, N.C.and the
application to CAMA for a major permit for a 101-spaces parking lot on the leased property
across from Rogers Bay Campground, with the St Moritz, a private oceanfront condominium
property to the north, and duplexes to the south.
As a local resident/homeowner, I have several concerns about this application:
(1) This area already has a large number of surrounding residents/property owners, including
more than 420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground, 32 unit owners at the St
Moritz to the north, and approximately 30 additional duplex residences (— 30) to the
south of the proposed parking lot;
(2) There is limited beach, only a few feet, at high tide;
(3) A proposed public parking for 101 vehicle would potentially add 100-400 (1-4 persons
per vehicle) that require access to this limited beach;
(4) The beach is also home to nesting turtles and susceptible to significant erosion;
(5) The lack of beach at high tide with the space requirements of that many additional people
is expected to result in unintentional damage to the dunes and wildlife, and accelerate
erosion;
(6) Traffic congestion in an already densely populated location is expected to be an
additional issue; and
(7) There are significant safety concerns for pedestrians from Rogers Bay who need to cross
the street to access the beach.
I am therefore very concerned that the scope of this parking is not acceptable as proposed and
needs to be reduced to more reasonable proportions to allow access to our beautiful beach while
preserving it for future enjoyment.
Thank you for your consideration.
Wi
RECEIVED
obert X.Robertazz Ak'RO�X' RobertmA
robertitz unit 601 OCT 017014 1ClaridgeDr.PHII
DCM-MHD CITY Verona, NJ 07044

September 26, 2014
Deborah Wilson
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
This letter is in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in North Topsail Beach, N.C.and the
application to CAMA for a major permit for a 101-spaces parking lot on the leased property
across from Rogers Bay Campground, with the St Moritz, a private oceanfront condominium
property to the north, and duplexes to the south.
As a local resident/homeowner, I have several concerns about this application:
(1) This area already has a large number of surrounding residents/property owners, including
more than 420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground, 32 unit owners at the St
Moritz to the north, and approximately 30 additional duplex residences (— 30) to the
south of the proposed parking lot;
(2) There is limited beach, only a few feet, at high tide;
(3) A proposed public parking for 101 vehicle would potentially add 100-400 (14 persons
per vehicle) that require access to this limited beach;
(4) The beach is also home to nesting turtles and susceptible to significant erosion;
(5) The lack of beach at high tide with the space requirements of that many additional people
is expected to result in unintentional damage to the dunes and wildlife, and accelerate
erosion;
(6) Traffic congestion in an already densely populated location is expected to be an
additional issue; and
(7) There are significant safety concerns for pedestrians from Rogers Bay who need to cross
the street to access the beach.
I am therefore very concerned that the scope of this parking is not acceptable as proposed and
needs to be reduced to more reasonable proportions to allow access to our beautiful beach while
preserving it for future enjoyment.
Thank you for your consideration.
With ,
Robert X. Ro ertaz�i.
St.Moritx Unit 601
RECEIVED
OCT 08 2014
DCM-MHD CITY
W. Robert X Ro6aierd
I Claridge Dr. PH I I RECEIVED
Verona, NJ07044 DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 012014

SEPT.26-,2614
N. C. Division Coastal management
127 Cardinal Drive
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405
Dear sir:
This letter is in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in North Topsail Beach, N.C.and the
application to CAMA for a major permit for a 101-spaces parking lot on the leased property
across from Rogers Bay Campground, with the St Moritz, a private oceanfront condominium
property to the north, and duplexes to the south.
As a local resident/homeowner, I have several concerns about this application:
(1) This area already has a large number of surrounding residents/property owners, including
more than 420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground, 32 unit owners at the St
Moritz to the north, and approximately 30 additional duplex residences (— 30) to the
south of the proposed parking lot;
(2) There is limited beach, only a few feet, at high tide;
(3) A proposed public parking for 101 vehicle would potentially add 10"W (1-4 persons
per vehicle) that require access to this limited beach-,
(4) The beach is also home to nesting turtles and susceptible to significant erosion;
(5) The lack of beach at high tide with the space requirements of that many additional people
is expected to result in unintentional damage to the dunes and wildlife, and accelerate
erosion;
(6) Traffic congestion in an already densely populated location is expected to be an
additional issue; and
(7) There are significant safety concerns for pedestrians from Rogers Bay who need to cross
the street to access the beach.
I am therefore very concerned that the scope of this parking is not acceptable as proposed and
needs to be reduced to more reasonable proportions to allow access to our beautiful beach while
preserving it for future enjoyment.
RECEIVED
Thank you for your consideration. nCT 0 0 71114
WDCM-MHD CITY
!i re ,
?obertazzi
RoMr. RabertX Roberlarci
St. Moritz Unit 601 1ClaridgeDr. PHII RECEIVED
Verona, NJ07044 DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 012014

®e ,Nn
NC� ■ R
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Lori Kijek
123 Vista Way Drive
Kernersville, NC 27284-3043
Dear Miss Kijek,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for your letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments. considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone]Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1Affinnadve Action Employer— Made in pad by recycled paper

Deborah Wilson
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr. EXT
Wilmington, NC 28405 - 3845
October 13, 2014
Reference: Concerns about Permit for Public Beach Parking on Hwy 210 Across From Rogers Bay
Campground (4021 Island Drive, N. Topsail)
Dear Ms Wilson,
I have a lot at Rogers Bay Campground that I have enjoyed for the past 9 years. I understand progress
can be a benefit as long it does not creates an adverse affect. I believe placing a 100+ parking lot across
the road will have several adverse affects on the beach environment. My concerns are the following:
• No beach at high tide so where are the people going to be but on the dunes which will causes
erosion
• There are several turtle nest in this area every year. It is important to keep them protected.
Having crowds will cause some disturbance to the reproduction of the turtles.
• The beach already has more trash since becoming public parking lot. Trash is unsightly and can
cause harm to aquatic life such as turtles and birds if eaten.
• The area is small and at times is crowded from Rogers Bay residents and the homes in the area.
Adding additional crowds will be damaging to the ecosystem from foot traffic on the beaches
and dunes and all the litter left behind.
• Additional city workers will be needed to monitor the area and clean up after the crowds.
Please reconsider cancelling this proposed idea of developing a larger parking lot. There is plenty of
public accesses to the beaches. We need to protect our beaches and keep N. Topsail special.
Thank you,
r
(SU v,
Lori Kijek
4021 Island Drive (79 Green)
N. Topsail, NC
-336- 31a- y933
Mbs Lori A. KtI*
[K] 123 via wry Dr.
Kaow"M96 NC 27284.3043
RECEIVED
OCT 28 R M.
DCM-MHD CITY
RECEIVED
9CM WILMINGTON. NC
Q�T 13 Z014

Jason Dail (Express Coordinator) October 13, 2014
NC Division of Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Dr. EXT
Wilmington, NC 28405
Reference: Concerns about Permit for Public Beach Parking on Hwy 210 Across From Rogers Bay
Campground (4021 Island Drive, N. Topsail)
Dear Jason,
I have a lot at Rogers Bay Campground that I have enjoyed for the past 9 years. I understand progress
can be a benefit as long it does not creates an adverse affect. I believe placing a 100+ parking lot across
the road will have several adverse affects on the beach environment. My concerns are the following:
• No beach at high tide so where are the people going to be but on the dunes which will causes
erosion
• There are several turtle nest in this area every year. It is important to keep them protected.
Having crowds will cause some disturbance to the reproduction of the turtles.
• The beach already has more trash since becoming public parking lot. Trash is unsightly and can
cause harm to aquatic life such as turtles and birds if eaten.
• The area is small and at times is crowded from Rogers Bay residents and the homes in the area.
Adding additional crowds will be damaging to the ecosystem from foot traffic on the beaches
and dunes and all the litter left behind.
• Additional city workers will be needed to monitor the area and clean up after the crowds.
Please reconsider cancelling this proposed idea of developing a larger parking lot. There is plenty of
public accesses to the beaches. We need to protect our beaches and keep N. Topsail special.
Thank you,
Lori Kijek
4021 Island Drive (79 Green)
N. Topsail, NC
33( - 3)a- V933
RECEIVED
OCT 28 PM.
DCM-MHD CITY
Miss Lori A Kijek
[K] 123 v;sm Way Dr. RECEIVED
Keme,sville, NC 27284d043 DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 2 3 2014

MCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Elvis Duljan
3540 W Mill Road
Hatboro, PA 19040
Dear Mr. Duljan,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for your letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] Internet: www.nodenr.gov
An Equal Oppoduniry I Affirmative Action Employer— Made in pan by recycled paper

Charles F. Riggs, P.L.S. L-2981
James A. Lewis, P.L.S. L-4562
Kenneth E. Johnson, P.L.S. L-4925
Corporate License (C-730)
CHARLES F. RIGGS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Land Surveyors
502 NEW BRIDGE STREET
P.O. Box 1570
JACKSONVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28541
TELEPHONE: [phone]
E-MAIL: rieeslandabizec.rr.com
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER STATEMENT
S'rF 3
Wilmington Office:
101 Scotts Hill Loop Road
Wilmington, N.C. 28411
[phone]
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to three tracts (Tax IDs 769-4. 769-4.3, 769-9.1) owned by
Topsail Beach, LLC & RAJ DC Holding, Inc. on Island Drive (Hwy 210), Town of North Topsail Beach,
Stump Sound Township, Onslow County, North Carolina. Town of North Topsail Beach leases the land and
proposes to construct as Site 3 a parking lot consisting of impervious and pervious stone surface
complimented with temporary portable restroom structures, hose spigot for rinsing station and one wooden
handicap accessible crossover accesses to the beach area. The existing parking area will be incorporated
into the new development plan to provide uniformed/designated parking spaces. Water service will be
provided by ONWASA. All areas of environmental concern have been evaluated by the North Carolina
Division of Coastal Management and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; these areas have been identified on the
enclosed plans.
The State of North Carolina Division of Coastal Management does not require a response; however the State
does consider no response to be no objection. If you do wish to respond or if you have objections, please
state them in the space below and return this form in the addressed, stamped envelope provided to Charles F.
Riggs & Associates, Inc., P. O. Box 1570, Jacksonville, NC 28541.
Please check the appropriate space for your response.
(✓ ) I have objections to the proposal.
I have o objections to the proposal.
RECEIVED
Signature / Date
rrDCAf-MHDCrry
r
+f /:
Print or Type Name
WILM Telephone Number
�r c; �%IJf U J, • J I i : ,I/ I / / : _ i! al fir/ /. ! . �l /
i407 e
r
17 en
,, 1*#V4 mycashasV'rr )1/ / M// i/
I/
• ma . Jto D61 1worth

42 V R
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Edwin B. Cooper, MD
4110 Island Drive, Unit 506
North Topsail Beach, NC 28460
Dear Dr. Cooper,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for your letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity I Affirmative Action Employer— Made in pad by recycled paper

CHARLES F. RIGGS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Land Surveyors
Charles F. Riggs, P.L.S. 1,2981 502 NEW BRIDGE STREET Wilmington offia:
James A. Lewis, P.L.S. L4562 P.O. Box 1570 101 Swat Hie Loop Road
Kenneth E. Johnson, P,L.S. L-4925 JACKSONVILLE, NORTH CAROU NA 28541 Wilmingmn, N.C. 28411
Corporate License (6730) TELEPHONE: [phone] [phone]
E-MAIL: rizalandabizec.mcom
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER STATEMENT
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to three tracts (Tax IDs 769-4. 769.4.3, 769-9.1) owned by
Topsail Beach, LLC & RAJDC Holding, Inc. on Island Drive (Hwy 210), Town of North Topsail Beach,
Stump Sound Township, Onslow County, North Carolina. Town of North Topsail Beach leases the land and
proposes to construct as Site 3 a parking lot consisting of impervious and pervious stone surface
complimented with temporary portable restroom structures, hose spigot for rinsing station and one wooden
handicap accessible crossover accesses to the beach area. The existing parking area will be incorporated
into the new development plan to provide uniformed/designated parking spaces. Water service will be
provided by ONWASA. All areas of environmental concern have been evaluated by the North Carolina
Division of Coastal Management and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; these areas have been identified on the
enclosed plans.
The State ofNorth Carolina Division of Coastal Management does not require a response; however the State
does consider no response to be no objection. If you do wish to respond or if you have objections, please
state them in the space below and return this form in the addressed, stamped envelope provided to Charles F.
Riggs & Associates, Inc„ P. O. Box 1570, Jacksonville, NC 28541.
Please check the appropriate space for your response.
( tx� I have objections to the proposal.
I have no objections to the proposal.
C-11 de—� nae'v/P12 �- 2�
Signature Data
E'DbxN
Print or Type Name
Telephone Number R / ry
... .. ...'R.
761�
Owl T- 4�--o 4
�
Comments:
�Urf jJrLK 1-6� Al OMS T"oo
Pl 1%o Alf.,
�JJNC (/
RECEIVED RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NO /
OCT o z 2014 SEP 3 0 2014
DCM-MHD CITY

c f

EDWIN B. COOPER, Jr., M.D., P.A.
704-C PLAZA BLVD, SUITE 108
IQNSTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28501
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
coo1erorthorehab2yahoo.com
September 18, 2014
Deborah Wilson
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr. Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Dear Ms. Wilson,
This letter is in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in North Topsail Beach, NC and
the application to CAMA for a major permit for a 101-spaces parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground, with the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property to the north, and duplexes to the south.
As a local resident/homeowner, I have several concerns about this application:
(1) This area already has a large number of surrounding residents/property owners,
including more than 420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground, 32 unit
owners at the St Moritz to the north, and approximately 30 additional duplex
residences (-30) to the south of the proposed parking lot;
(2) There is limited beach, only a few feet, at high tide;
(3) A proposed public parking lot for 101 vehicles would potentially add 100-400 (1-4
persons per vehicle) that require access to this limited beach;
(4) The beach is also home to nesting turtles and susceptible to significant erosion;
(5) The lack of beach at high tide with the space requirements of that many additional
people is expected to result in unintentional damage to the dunes and wildlife, and
accelerate erosion;
(6) Traffic congestion in an already densely populated location is expected to be an
additional issue;
(7) There are significant safety concerns for pedestrians from Rogers Bay who need to
cross the street to access the beach.
I am therefore very concerned that the scope of this parking lot is not acceptable as
proposed and needs to be reduced to more reasonable proportions to allow access to our
beautiful beach while preserving it for future enjoyment. RECEIVE0
EB RECEIVED P
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
Thank you for your consideration. pCM,MOCOY
With best regards, SEP 2 2 2014
Ed Cooper

A
MODE R
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Edward and Linda Spence
312 Tallowwood Drive
Gamer, NC 27529
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Spence,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for your letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone]Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity (Affirmative Action Employer — Made in pad by recycled paper

September 24, 2014
NC Division Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive
Wilmington, NC 28405
Gentlemen:
This letter is in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in North Topsail Beach, N.C.and the
application to CAMA for a major permit for a 101-spaces parking lot on the leased property
across from Rogers Bay Campground, with the St Moritz, a private oceanfront condominium
property to the north, and duplexes to the south.
As a local resident/homeowner, I have several concerns about this application:
(1) This area already has a large number of surrounding residents/property owners, including
more than 420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground, 32 unit owners at the St
Moritz to the north, and approximately 30 additional duplex residences (— 30) to the south
of the proposed parking lot;
(2) There is limited beach, only a few feet, at high tide;
(3) A proposed public parking for 101 vehicle would potentially add 100-400 (1-4 persons
per vehicle) that require access to this limited beach;
(4) The beach is also home to nesting turtles and susceptible to significant erosion;
(5) The lack of beach at high tide with the space requirements of that many additional people
is expected to result in unintentional damage to the dunes and wildlife, and accelerate
erosion;
(6) Traffic congestion in an already densely populated location is expected to be an additional
issue; and
(7) There are significant safety concerns for pedestrians from Rogers Bay who need to cross
the street to access the beach.
I am therefore very concerned that the scope of this parking is not acceptable as proposed and
needs to be reduced to more reasonable proportions to allow access to our beautiful beach while RECEIVED
preserving it for future enjoyment.
Thank you for your consideration.
OCT O r ?n+4
DCM-MHD CITY
With best regards, DCM WILM NIGTON, NC
SEP 2 6 2014

Edward and Linda S nce
4110 Island Drive
N Topsail Beach, NC 28460
RECEIVE()
OCT DIM
DCNM1;YV W(f;tTX
DCM WECEIVED
ILMINGTON, NC
SEP 2 6 2014

i
Deborah Wilson 8/25/14
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
Thank you for your time in reviewing the following documented concerns. This is in
reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in N. Topsail Beach, N. Carolina. The town
has made an application for a major permit to develop excessive public parking. The
project is slated to disturb 1471 acres. Please consider the following unintended
consequences.
The coastal community of Topsail Beach, North Carolina is a delicate ecosystem with
many miles of pristine sandy beaches. It's a place where "high rise development is not
allowed, beautification is encouraged, and conservation of the island environment is a
top priority."
Instead of taking the lead to safeguard our fragile ecosystem, the city government,
however, intends to develop a large piece of uninhabited beach into a ioi-spaces parking
lot on leased property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to private
oceanfront property (St. Moritz) at 4110 Island Drive (public parking, N Topsail Beach,
N.C. Tax parcels 769-9.1/ 769-4). The Board of Aldermen has been dismissive in
addressing our residents' concerns regarding this public parking development plan.
Rather than using this area of the beach in a sustainable way by doing something to
beautify and permanently protect the dune lands from future development, the city
government's endorsement of a parking lot constitutes conscious and deliberate
disregard for the environment. Oceanfront beach property — and the wildlife it sustains -
- should not be despoiled by a parking lot. Imposing a ioi car parking lot on beach -
front land will have negative and unintended consequences.
The Issue here?
The adverse effects of a large parking lot on an ecosystem that is currently fragile from
the forces of nature must be considered. Efforts to nourish and stabilize the beach at this
site -- which is particularly prone to dune vulnerability and shrinking beach -- have been
largely unsuccessful to date. Development will certainly exacerbate an already delicate
environment. RECEIVED
The unintended consequences?
OCT 01 2014
DCM-MHD CITY
• Threat to the ability of coastal wildlife to flourish in its natural environment.
Sensitive habitats will be degraded or lost.
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NO
SEP 252014

o Sea Turtles are especially vulnerable to intensive ecological disruptions as
they visit dunes seeking shelter and safe places to lay their eggs
o The nesting habitat of birds and plants species in the area are also
threatened
Beach erosion will be heavily influenced by more human activity.
o Humans can often, either willfully or ignorantly, damage a fragile
ecosystem by littering and pollution.
o The coastal vegetation on sand dunes are susceptible to abuse by increased
human and animal traffic.
o At high tide there is no beach, therefore, sitting on the dunes and
destroying our barrier is a likely outcome.
• Development of this land will impede the Island's natural landward progression
• The town is encouraging more public activity and traffic congestion in an already
denselypopulated location.
• Additional cost to city residents to manage and provide police presence is inevitable
• Impact on the property and security of the surrounding neighbors
• The removal of intact vegetation along the highway will further weaken a fragile
dune barrier system
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
RECEIVED
OCT A 1 2014
DCM-WU rC#y
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
SEP 2 5 2014

September 24, 2014
Mr. Braxton Davis
Director DCM
400 Commerce Ave
Morehead City, NC 28557-3421
Dear Mr. Davis
12SC81VSD
SEP 2 6 2014
1)Ct4--TA lD CMY
This letter is in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in North Topsail Beach, N.C.and the
application to CAMA for a major permit for a 101-spaces parking lot on the leased property
across from Rogers Bay Campground, with the St Moritz, a private oceanfront condominium
property to the north, and duplexes to the south.
As a local resident/homeowner, I have several concerns about this application:
(1) This area already has a large number of surrounding residents/property owners, including
more than 420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground, 32 unit owners at the St
Moritz to the north, and approximately 30 additional duplex residences (— 30) to the south
of the proposed parking lot;
(2) There is limited beach, only a few feet, at high tide;
(3) A proposed public parking for 101 vehicle would potentially add 100-400 (1-4 persons
per vehicle) that require access to this limited beach;
(4) The beach is also home to nesting turtles and susceptible to significant erosion;
(5) The lack of beach at high tide with the space requirements of that many additional people
is expected to result in unintentional damage to the dunes and wildlife, and accelerate
erosion;
(6) Traffic congestion in an already densely populated location is expected to be an additional
issue; and
(7) There are significant safety concerns for pedestrians from Rogers Bay who need to cross
the street to access the beach.
I am therefore very concerned that the scope of this parking is not acceptable as proposed and
needs to be reduced to more reasonable proportions to allow access to our beautiful beach while
preserving it for future enjoyment.

z:ECEtvFn
Thank you for your consideration.
z
bestregards,
nrd and Linda Spen
4110 Island Drive
N Topsail Beach, NC 28460
SEP 2 6 2014

RC"® NR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Martin Lang
2033 Souli Drive
Greensburg, PA 15601
Dear Mr. Lang,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for your letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity IA(firmative Action Employer— Made in part by recycled paper

9/23/14
n.e(A✓ f'�S. n. WII)WI
This letter is in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in North Topsail Beach, N.C.and the
application to CAMA for a major permit for a 101-spaces parking lot on the leased property
across from Rogers Bay Campground, with the St Moritz, a private oceanfront condominium
property to the north, and duplexes to the south.
As a local resident/homeowner, I have several concerns about this application:
(1) This area already has a large number of surrounding residents/property owners, including
more than 420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground, 32 unit owners at the St
Moritz to the north, and approximately 30 additional duplex residences (— 30) to the
south of the proposed parking lot;
(2) There is limited beach, only a few feet, at high tide;
(3) A proposed public parking for 101 vehicle would potentially add 100,400 (14 persons
per vehicle) that require access to this limited beach;
(4) The beach is also home to nesting turtles and susceptible to significant erosion;
(5) The lack of beach at high tide with the space requirements of that many additional people
is expected to result in unintentional damage to the dunes and wildlife, and accelerate
erosion;
(6) Traffic congestion in an already densely populated location is expected to be an
additional issue; and
(7) There are significant safety concerns for pedestrians from Rogers Bay who need to cross
the street to access the beach.
I am therefore very concerned that the scope of this parking is not acceptable as proposed and
needs to be reduced to more reasonable proportions to allow access to our beautiful beach while
preserving it for future enjoyment.
Thank you for your consideration.
With best regards,
N 4, �, , L
�4. frUYIl -? U W
Cl ul 0 S� sc�
RECEIVED
OU 01 2014
DCM-MHD CITY
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
SEP 292014

Deborah Wilson August 25 2014
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C.The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-spaces parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below,is already densely populated with more than 420
property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are also
additional duplex residences (— 30) to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RE(lctWED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
AUG 2 � 2014

With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes andwildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already denselypopulated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
ith best regards,
�� lhv-1
Martin Lang ) I
St Moritz HOA President
2033 Souli Dr
Greensburg, Pa. i56oi
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
AUG 2 92014

w
Braxton Davis
Director Coastal Management
44 Commerce Ave
Moorehead City, NC 28557
Dear Mr. Davis
August 0FVMVM
SEP 2 6 2014
DCM-MHD CrrY
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C.The Town of North Topsail Beach has plans to make application to
CAMA for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-spaces parking lot on the
leased property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private
oceanfront condominium property.
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also additional duplex residences (— 30) to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.

There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
finther beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors and resulting costs to Town residents from
additional police presence.
• Removal of a mature vegetation system west of the dunes weakening a fragile dune barrier
system
• Threat to nesting birds.
• Water runoff and public sanitation issues.
• Threat to a beach already in need of re nourishment with no definitive plan for a change in
our COBRA status allowing for re nourishment.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200-400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
S' rely,
��))N
� artin Lang
President St Moritz Board
724-454-5856
RECMVED
SEP 2 6 2014
t
DCM-MHDCrrY

1
d RO R
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Dr. Toni M. Somers
4110 Island Drive, Unit 402
North Topsail Beach, NC 28460
Dear Sir or Madam,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for your letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Of
—c
x
R. Howell
jor Permits Coordinator
Neigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
1Internet: www.nodenr.gov
e Employer- Made in pad by recycled paper

Braxton C. Davis
Director, Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557-3421
Dear Mr. Davis,
itECEiVEi)
S' ^ 2 6 2014
ilCMcay
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in North Topsail
Beach, NC. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA for a major permit with a
proposed plan that calls for a 101-spaces parking lot on the leased property across from Rogers Bay
Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront condominium property.
As a resident of the St. Moritz for the past 6 years, I have walked leisurely along the street, the beach and
through the land where the gravel lot is proposed. I am strongly opposed to this lot as there is no benefit to the
wildlife, coastal birds and vegetation. As an avid bird watcher, I have spotted many beach birds over the years
as I walked this lot. Putting a gravel lot in an area inhabited by various species of birds is not in the best
interest for the health and safety of our coastal birds. The removal of ground vegetation and shrubs will result in
loss of plants, loss of habitat for birds, insects, small reptiles, bats and even feral cats.
Let me point out all the species that will vanish to make way for a gravel lot that will be open to the public in
one of the most densely populated parts of the island where the beach at high tide is nonexistent.
First, two state -threatened species, "piping plovers" and "terns" come here to nest since there are usually no/few
people on the beach in this area. We need to protect our beaches and the shorebirds that visit and depend on
them every year. The Piping Plover, a federally threatened and endangered shorebird, inhabits wide, open
beaches, shorelines and breeds primarily along the Atlantic coast. We are fortunate to see them in our area. By
the way, the proposed gravel lot leads to habitat loss and human disturbance --two of biggest threats to Piping
Plovers today.
Birds are important indicators of the overall health of our environment. They inform us about threats to our
water, air, natural resources, climate and more. Once the vegetation is gone and the ground is flattened with
gravel and people and cars are everywhere, where will the birds nest? Breeding season for most beach -nesting
birds is April through the end of August. Where will these birds nest when a perfect area they called home is
now a gravel lot? In fact, several nesting shorebirds that we usually keep an eye out for on the beach; will
probably never be seen again, if this lot is highly populated during these months. For example, we have spotted
Oystercatchers, Black Skimmer, Terns, and Piping Plovers and sometimes Ospreys.
I urge you to consider the consequences of the development of this gravel lot and related activities and how it
will impact both the quantity and quality of wildlife habitats. The loss of habitat through the conversion of land
from its natural state to a developed gravel lot will be devastating on these ecosystems.
Respectfully Submitted,
16,4 M-,%W*- 4-
Dr. Toni M. Somers
4110 Island Drive, Unit 402
North Topsail Beach NC 28460
910-541-0247
torsi somers(i ,wame.edu

Debbie Wilson
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr. Ext.
Wilmington, North Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms. Wilson,
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in North Topsail
Beach, NC. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA for a major permit with a
proposed plan that calls for a 101-spaces parking lot on the leased property across from Rogers Bay
Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront condominium property.
As a resident of the St. Moritz for the past 6 years, I have walked leisurely along the street, the beach and
through the land where the gravel lot is proposed. I am strongly opposed to this lot as there is no benefit to the
wildlife, coastal birds and vegetation. As an avid bird watcher, I have spotted many beach birds over the years
as I walked this lot. Putting a gravel lot in an area inhabited by various species of birds is not in the best
interest for the health and safety of our coastal birds. The removal of ground vegetation and shrubs will result in
loss of plants, loss of habitat for birds, insects, small reptiles, bats and even feral cats.
Let me point out all the species that will vanish to make way for a gravel lot that will be open to the public in
one of the most densely populated parts of the island where the beach at high tide is nonexistent.
First, two state -threatened species, "piping plovers" and "terns" come here to nest since there are usually no/few
people on the beach in this area. We need to protect our beaches and the shorebirds that visit and depend on
them every year. The Piping Plover, a federally threatened and endangered shorebird, inhabits wide, open
beaches, shorelines and breeds primarily along the Atlantic coast. We are fortunate to see them in our area. By
the way, the proposed gravel lot leads to habitat loss and human disturbance --two of biggest threats to Piping
Plovers today.
Birds are important indicators of the overall health of our environment. They inform us about threats to our
water, air, natural resources, climate and more. Once the vegetation is gone and the ground is flattened with
gravel and people and cars are everywhere, where will the birds nest? Breeding season for most beach -nesting
birds is April through the end of August. Where will these birds nest when a perfect area they called home is
now a gravel lot? In fact, several nesting shorebirds that we usually keep an eye out for on the beach; will
probably never be seen again, if this lot is highly populated during these months. For example, we have spotted
Oystercatchers, Black Skimmer, Terns, and Piping Plovers and sometimes Ospreys.
I urge you to consider the consequences of the development of this gravel lot and related activities and how it
will impact both the quantity and quality of wildlife habitats. The loss of habitat through the conversion of land
from its natural state to a developed gravel lot will be devastating on these ecosystems.
Respectfully Submitted,
Dr. Toni M. Somers
4110 Island Drive, Unit 402
North Topsail Beach NC 28460
910-541-0247
toni somersAwavne.edu
RECEWD
OCT 01 209
DCM-MHD CITY
DCM WILM NIGTON, NC
SEP 2 6 2014
ton,

RE: Concern regarding the CAMA Major Permit application for parking lot site #3 in North Topsail
Beach.
The pending CAMA Major Permit application for parking lot site 3, in my humble opinion, has important
ecological implications. If approved. it WILL HAVE Iona lasting effects on dunes and other coastal
ecosystems, which ultimately will contribute to the need for extensive conservation efforts by our local
community to turn things around. Thus, prior to the approval of this permit, I would like to request a
formal environmental impact assessment to determine the environmental consequences of the
proposed parking lot site #3 before deciding whether or not to proceed with this project.
I am a strong believer the people in our community have the right to the customary free use and
enjoyment of the ocean beaches. However, the proposed lot #3 is in an area that has very little beach at
high tide. The beach here is unstable. Forces like wind, waves, tides and currents have changed the
beach considerably over the past 6 years and the beach is cut away at high tide. We need to be
cognizant of global warming which I believe has caused much of the beach erosion.
Further let's not forget, there is life on the beach other than the humans enjoying the ocean. When the
tides come in waves wash up on the beach and they often contain organic matter, which the bodies of
decaying insects, bacteria and fungi break down, releasing nutrients into the sand which are used by
plants. This will certainly be disrupted with the activity of an estimated 200 to 400 people enjoying the
beach on any given day.
The endangered piping plover feeds along this area of the beach and sand flats. They can be seen
feeding on the beach by pecking for invertebrates below the sand surface. How likely are they to look
for prey and find crustaceans, insects, and worms in a small area covered with wall to wall people?
Furthermore, this many people on a hot summer day can unknowingly squash small creatures that live
on or under the sand and compress their habitat. These animals are important food for shorebirds.
Large numbers of people and activity there can also frighten away shorebirds and other species
sheltering in the dunes and vegetation. The presence of many people in this small area may also cause
the coastal birds and other wildlife to desert the area.
The many people inhabiting this area of beach threatens the likelihood of sea turtle nests. Since many
sea turtles return to the same area of beach each time to nest, many people using a small area can
disrupt their cycle. Typically we see these nests at spots on the beach up close to the dunes were
people have never been. If this area is to become a public beach, it would be very unusual to find a spot
where a beach chair or two have not been set up-- particularly very close to the dunes as the tide
pushes the sunbathers back. This will certainly deter turtles from laying nests ever in this area. Over the
pastr several years I have seen numerous turtle nests in this very area.
This great diversity of wild life we all enjoy will become more imperiled because of the increases in RECEIVED
human activities that go beyond the ability of the ecosystem to repair itself. Consequently, conservatioOCT 2 2 1014
of our beaches as functional ecosystems and protection of their unique biodiversity requires your very DCM-MHD CITY
careful decision on this major permit request.
Respectfully submitted, . RECEIVED
/I l - _(j N Q� DCM WILMINGTON, NC
�y. d( p /f6Q fY�` OCT 2 0 n4

V(. RAVIs-
RE: Concern regarding the CAMA Major Permit application for parking lot site #3 in North Topsail
Beach.
The pending CAMA Major Permit application for parking lot site 3, in my humble opinion, has important
ecological implications. If approved, it WILL HAVE Iona lasting effects on dunes and other coastal
ecosystems, which ultimately will contribute to the need for extensive conservation efforts by our local
community to turn things around. Thus, prior to the approval of this permit, I would like to request a
formal environmental impact assessment to determine the environmental consequences of the
proposed parking lot site #3 before deciding whether or not to proceed with this project.
I am a strong believer the people in our community have the right to the customary free use and
enjoyment of the ocean beaches. However, the proposed lot #3 is in an area that has very little beach at
high tide. The beach here is unstable. Forces like wind, waves, tides and currents have changed the
beach considerably over the past 6 years and the beach is cut away at high tide. We need to be
cognizant of global warming which I believe has caused much of the beach erosion.
Further let's not forget, there is life on the beach other than the humans enjoying the ocean. When the
tides come in waves wash up on the beach and they often contain organic matter, which the bodies of
decaying insects, bacteria and fungi break down, releasing nutrients into the sand which are used by
plants. This will certainly be disrupted with the activity of an estimated 200 to 400 people enjoying the
beach on any given day.
The endangered piping plover feeds along this area of the beach and sand flats. They can be seen
feeding on the beach by pecking for invertebrates below the sand surface. How likely are they to look
for prey and find crustaceans, insects, and worms in a small area covered with wall to wall people?
Furthermore, this many people on a hot summer day can unknowingly squash small creatures that live
on or under the sand and compress their habitat. These animals are important food for shorebirds.
Large numbers of people and activity there can also frighten away shorebirds and other species
sheltering in the dunes and vegetation. The presence of many people in this small area may also cause
the coastal birds and other wildlife to desert the area.
The many people inhabiting this area of beach threatens the likelihood of sea turtle nests. Since many
sea turtles return to the same area of beach each time to nest, many people using a small area can
disrupt their cycle. Typically we see these nests at spots on the beach up close to the dunes were
people have never been. If this area is to become a public beach, it would be very unusual to find a spot
where a beach chair or two have not been set up— particularly very close to the dunes as the tide
pushes the sunbathers back. This will certainly deter turtles from laying nests ever in this area. Over the
pastr several years I have seen numerous turtle nests in this very area.
This great diversity of wild life we all enjoy will become more imperiled because of the increases in
human activities that go beyond the ability of the ecosystem to repair itself. Consequently, conservation
of our beaches as functional ecosystems and protection of their unique biodiversity requires your very
careful decision on this major permit request.
Respectfully submitted,LPN
yy.lNY
;-0rSaAL
RECEIVED
OCT LO 2014
DCM4AHO CITY

Charles F. Riggs, P.L.S. L-2981
James A. Lewis, P.L.S. L-4562
Kenneth E.Johnson, P.L.S. L-4925
Corporate License (C-730)
CHARLES F. RIGGS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Land Surveyors
502 NEW BRIDGE STREET
P.O. Box 1570
JACKSONVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
TELEPHONE: [phone]
E-MAIL: [e-mail]
Wilmington Office:
101 Scotts Hill Loop Road
28541 Wilmington, N.C. 29411
[phone]
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER STATEMENT
I hereby certify that 1 own property adjacent to three tracts (Tax IDs 769-4. 769-4.3, 769-9.1) owned by
Topsail Beach, LLC & RAJDC Holding, Inc. on Island Drive (Hwy 210), Town of North Topsail Beach,
Stump Sound Township, Onslow, County, North Carolina. Town of North Topsail Beach leases the land and
proposes to construct as Site 3 a parking lot consisting of impervious and pervious stone surface
complimented with temporary portable restroom structures, hose spigot for rinsing station and one wooden
handicap accessible crossover accesses to the beach area. The existing parking area will be incorporated
into the new development plan to provide uniformed/designated parking spaces. Water service will be
provided by ONWASA. All areas of environmental concern have been evaluated by the North Carolina
Division of Coastal Management and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; these areas have been identified on the
enclosed plans.
The State of North Carolina Division of Coastal Management does not require a response; however the State
does consider no response to be no objection. If you do wish to respond or if you have objections, please
state them in the space below and return this form in the addressed, stamped envelope provided to Charles F.
Riggs & Associates, Inc., P. O. Box 1570, Jacksonville, NC 28541.
Please check the appropriate space for your response.
I have objections to the proposal.
( ) I have no objections to the proposal. RECEIVED
OCT 012014
1(z DCM-MHD CITY
Signature Date
k&yitk Lfa f ti 3o S �. ltlNvt}2
Print or Type Name
H I I $�9 Su 3Ct
Telephone Number A 1 11
Comments: 6 t a I- k N V Iti, 15 � YV c r f I� ti p( �( d T l
rt -tkI,t 1L hLknr\ k,v,1 (QJ Sy w, IL
fa /l .0 t h u Yh ry I h 1i It 1, 11 I. II S h i. 11 n IA. I I I C
eii I ( L
v U V DCM WILMINGTON, NC
tM ( o r, h r, &v/� Fl} A rr A I b\ V rr I h I n a f� S E P 2 9 2014

Deborah Wilson 8/25/14
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
Thank you for your time in reviewing the following documented concerns. This is in
reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in N. Topsail Beach, N. Carolina. The town
has made an application for a major permit to develop excessive public parking. The
project is slated to disturb 1471 acres. Please consider the following unintended
consequences.
The coastal community of Topsail Beach, North Carolina is a delicate ecosystem with
many miles of pristine sandy beaches. It's a place where "high rise development is not
allowed, beautification is encouraged, and conservation of the island environment is a
top priority."
Instead of taking the lead to safeguard our fragile ecosystem, the city government,
however, intends to develop a large piece of uninhabited beach into a 1oi-spaces parking
lot on leased property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to private
oceanfront property (St. Moritz) at 4110 Island Drive (public parking, N Topsail Beach,
N.C. Tax parcels 769-9.1/ 769-4). The Board of Aldermen has been dismissive in
addressing our residents' concerns regarding this public parking development plan.
Rather than using this area of the beach in a sustainable way by doing something to
beautify and permanently protect the dune lands from future development, the city
government's endorsement of a parking lot constitutes conscious and deliberate
disregard for the environment. Oceanfront beach property — and the wildlife it sustains -
- should not be despoiled by a parking lot. Imposing a 1o1 car parking lot on beach -
front land will have negative and unintended consequences.
The Issue here?
The adverse effects of a large parking lot on an ecosystem that is currently fragile from
the forces of nature must be considered. Efforts to nourish and stabilize the beach at this
site -- which is particularly prone to dune vulnerability and shrinking beach -- have been
largely unsuccessful to date. Development will certainly exacerbate an already delicate
environment.
The unintended consequences?
Threat to the ability of coastal wildlife to flourish in its natural environment.
Sensitive habitatswill be , degraded or lost.
+i
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
F�
AUG 2 9 2014

o Sea Turtles are especially vulnerable to intensive ecological disruptions as
they visit dunes seeking shelter and safe places to lay their eggs
o The nesting habitat of birds and plants species in the area are also
threatened
Beach erosion will be heavily influenced by more human activity.
o Humans can often, either willfully or ignorantly, damage a fragile
ecosystem by littering and pollution.
o The coastal vegetation on sand dunes are susceptible to abuse by increased
human and animal traffic.
o At high tide there is no beach, therefore, sitting on the dunes and
destroying our barrier is a likely outcome.
• Development of this land will impede the Island's natural landward progression
• The town is encouraging more public activity and traffic congestion in an already
denselypopulated location.
• Additional cost to city residents to manage and provide police presence is inevitable
• Impact on the property and security of the surrounding neighbors
• The removal of intact vegetation along the highway will further weaken a fragile
dune barrier system
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
AUG 19 2014

NMUNK
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Daniel Lorenzo
4110 Island Drive, Unit 202
North Topsail Beach, NC 28460
Dear Mr. Lorenzo,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for your letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments donsidered by the
Division, before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5715 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
/A XLI-161!
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity I Affirmative Action Employer— Made in part by recycled paper

DANIEL LORENZO
4110 Island Drive, Unit 202
North Topsail Beach, NC 28460
September 23, 2014
Mr. Braxton Davis
Director Coastal Management
44 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
Re: North Topsail Beach Parking Lot Site # 3
Dear Mr. Davis:
I have been an adjacent property owner of the proposed parking lot # 3 site for about 26 years,
and a full time resident.
I OPPOSE the Site # 3 lot across from Rogers Bay, and respectfully request that the permit be
denied for some of the following reasons;
1. Fragile dune —This fragile dune, with limited sea side protection, is not natural, but located
due to prior storms.
2. Limited beach — High tide is often to base of dune.
3. Densely populated —This location is most densely populated area of North Topsail Beach.
4. Alternate location — Considering engineering requirements and all economic costs, there are
alternate sites that will accomplish the overall project purposes with less adverse impact.
Thank you for considering my OBJECTIONS.
Very truly yours;
Daniel Lorenzo 0�
SEP 24 2014

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
January 12, 2015
Ruth Rich
PO Box 836
Sneads Ferry, NC 28460
Dear Mrs. Rich,
Thank you for your letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty.(20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1Affinnative Action Employer— Made in parr by recycled paper

Environmental issues (of the dunes, turtle nestings, etc).
Extreme traffic congestion
Keep in mind that while Rogers Bay is a campground, we are not merely a campground. All 442 lots are
OWNED by individuals and they are "regulars" to the area. This is not a "public" campground where
campers come and go on a daily or weekly basis.
I would appreciate consideration to my objections when making a decision regarding the permit.
Sincerely, �,.�
PA)JU
Ruth Rich
PO Box 836
Sneads Ferry, NC 28460
RECEIVED
[)CM WILMINGTON. NC
SEP 0 2 2U14

/N
RDNR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 12, 2015
Sheila De Bose
219 Gold Leaf Drive
Hampstead, NC 28443
Dear Ms. De Bose,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for your letter concerning the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) major permit
request submitted by the Town of North Topsail Beach, requesting authorization to develop a
parking lot at 4030 Island Drive, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The Division
appreciates your concerns about the proposed project.
The Coastal Area Management Act permit review process involves a coordinated state and
federal review of each permit application, with all review agency comments considered by the
Division before final action is taken on a permit application. In this case, no inconsistencies with
the Coastal Area Management Act were identified as a result of this review. Consequently, the
Division has issued a Major Permit No. 5-15 for the proposed activity. A copy of the permit is
being provided to you for your information.
If you wish to object to the actions taken on this permit application, you may request an appeal
of this decision within twenty (20) days of the permit decision. If you would like copies of the
appropriate appeal forms or should you like to discuss the specifics of the process, please contact
me by telephone at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jonathan R. Howell
Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone]Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity I Affirmative Acton Employer— Made in part by recycled paper

e
Deborah Wilson
District Manager CAMA
127 Cardinal Dr Ext.
Wilmington, N. Carolina 28405-3845
Dear Ms Wilson,
September 25, 2014
I am writing this letter to express my concern in reference to the proposed parking lot site 3 in
North Topsail Beach, N.C. The Town of North Topsail Beach has made an application to CAMA
for a major permit with a proposed plan that calls for a 101-space parking lot on the leased
property across from Rogers Bay Campground and next to the St Moritz, a private oceanfront
condominium property.
As a local property owner, I have several concerns about this application:
This area, shown in the aerial photograph below, is already densely populated with more than
420 property owners in Rogers Bay Campground and 32 unit owners at the St Moritz. There are
also an additional approximately 30 duplex residences to the south of the proposed parking lot.
Of particular concern in regards to this project, is that there are only a few feet of beach in this
area at high tide (see photographs below of high tide taken July 2014 in front of proposed
parking area and St. Moritz).
RECEIVED
OCT 0 0 2014
DCM-MHD(Oy
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC

r : y
With the lack of beach at high tide, all the umbrellas and vacationers (as shown in the previous
pictures) back up to the dunes, which are also home to nesting turtles and other wildlife.
There were 2 turtle nests in the beach area of
the proposed parking this summer (one of them
is shown in photograph to the left). I am
therefore concerned that the scope of this
parking lot that calls for 101 cars with
potentially 200-400 additional people (2-4
individuals per vehicle) will have a serious
impact on our dunes and wildlife, and result in
further beach erosion.
Some additional concerns include:
• Increased public activity with resulting traffic congestion in an already densely populated
location.
• Safety concerns, due to increased traffic, for pedestrians crossing to and from Rogers Bay.
• Possible security issues for surrounding neighbors, and resulting costs to Town residents
from additional police presence.
• Additional trash created by the additional public activity in this area.
Our beaches are unique natural resources that should provide enjoyment to both local residents
and visiting vacationers. Although I understand and support that more public parking is needed
in the Town of North Topsail Beach to provide this access, I am concerned that the current scope
of the parking project (101 spaces; 200400 people) at this particular location is beyond the
capacity of the available ecosystem and will ultimately damage what we are striving to maintain.
Thank you for your consideration.
With best regards,
RECEIVED
OCT 0
DCM-MH CID CITY
RECEIVED
Q P S DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 0 2 2014
Ms. Sheila De Base
219 Gold Leaf Dr.
Hampstead, NC 28 3

Petition to Stop North Topsail Beach from Establishing a Parking Lot and Beach
Crossover on Highway 210 Directly Across From Rogers Bay
Petition Summary and At the present time there are 442 property owners across the street and 35 apartments in the ST Moritz condo adjacent to the
Background: proposed site which currently use the beach in this area. The town of NTB is planning to construct a parking lot of a capacity of
approximately 150 cars which will be devastating to the vegetation, bird population and on the beach side the established turtle`
O
nesting area. The available beach area at high tide in this section is less than 20 It and is already overpopulated on most 0% x
weekends in the summer.
Action Petitioned For: We, the undersigned, are concerned citizens who urge the Coastal Area Management Association to act now to reject the o 0
North Topsail proposed Parking Lot on Highway 210 directly in front of Rogers Bay Campground and stop the unnecessary
destruction of an ecologically fragile wildlife habitat, turtle nesting area and the overcrowding of a section of beach which is
already experiencing a heavy bad of traffic from adjacent clusters of established residents already using the affected area.
120 Dock St. Rogers Bay
El 0
• '
��11
. A. •
/'e/MTWFJITMUXa
/ I ( jt't J Y-
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
0 C T 2 12014

Printed Name
Signature
Address
Comment
Date
1
►�4k-�ra Q;b
O�Lc,lnan,
n
23"1.�0- �
aeS�v he5�,.,,`.,' W��u�
(a �o �
UAY- ..
^X-/
/p�
/Z-
je
3
revs
10 -iZ-/
EIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 2 12014

Printed Name
Signature
Address
Comment
Date
Key k'3ehk'qmS
eoM"k
An A}\ah+t:c
fsr9bt\j6
NO TVPlLGOF-5'ir
I`I
lC'a8f{z a. GLFEE
2 g A r L R >JJ- is
1_�
2j 0-
oS G 1011
�8 -6
-Ke-
tI 11 \
Ne (vp-� kok)64 )1441(
�0llcLIvs4 �
Cq l� g OUZLE`f ruMP' -
/ PS
E ,Dw
Q*rho:-e55:�
0
/4Z aaA-Na¢
cf& &- oaA Yl)-7/ /y
l l? 13
) '7 t3 ✓ 1 ?'� I °�'
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NQ p- r!f
1 7(� OCT 21 2014
Nh- knb-X#i SfvK l fca T)hS (/
MINA A2 0 U.

R
41 ! H
-3
��tv

Petition to Stop North Topsail Beach from Establishing a Parking Lot and Beach
Crossover on Highway 210 Directly Across From Rogers Bay
reoaon Summary ana At me present time there are 44L property owners across the street and 35 apartments in the ST Moritz condo adjacent to the
Background: proposed site w i h currently use the beach in this area. The town of NTB is planning to construct a parking lot of a capacity of
approximatel, Cars which will be devastating to the vegetation, bird population and on the beach side the established turtle
nesting area. The available beach area at high tide in this section is less than 20 ft and is already overpopulated on most
weekends in the summer.
Action Petitioned For: We, the undersigned, are concerned citizens who urge the Coastal Area Management Association to act now to reject the
North Topsail proposed Parking Lot on Highway 210 directly in front of Rogers Bay Campground and stop the unnecessary
destruction of an ecologically fragile wildlife habitat, turtle nesting area and the overcrowding of a section of beach which is
already experiencing a heavy load of traffic from adjacent clusters of established residents already using the affected area.
Printed Name
Signature
Address
Comment
Date
Robert Gillett
a ],kas1Q
120 Dock St. RogersBay
'� dad as iy
tD�
�ar►�a�C,ilen�4�
4,, CFYW4
(i?aockSf
2020r
��}}
�J.tiSe�,lfea 4n
S'®hNf0 �±/7
rN �%ljG �{
112 �z
ara
gashinski
a Ate'gaer
T kagtk 6t" RogerS "`/
L
b n
SI '�,r,v1i hr, st 12405ri r3oy
wT rrrn Roe Fyrmv (r
8
0
✓eurseJ, l+c.
c �>
L '—\,
/Srj RerJ 5,� Rervs 1307
sol a,.kv'i. cc,..s
41
R'=CEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 2 12014

sLill
�
■
REvEiVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
0 C T 2 1 2014

Petition to Stop North Topsail Beach from Establishing a Parking Lot and Beach
Crossover on Highway 210 Directly Across From Rogers Bay
.r U
0 o U
Petition Summary and At the present time there are 442 property owners across the street and 35 apartments in the ST Moritz condo adjacent to the
N
Background: proposed site whig�gurrently use the beach in this area. The town of NTB is planning to construct a parking lot of a capacity
w O°
of approximately ¢ cars which will be devastating to the vegetation, bird population and on the beach side the established
c o v
turtle nesting area. The available beach area at high tide in this section is less than 20 ft and is already overpopulated on most
weekends in the summer.
Action Petitioned For: We, the undersigned, are concerned citizens who urge the Coastal Area Management Association to act now to reject the
North Topsail proposed Parking Lot on Highway 210 directly in front of Rogers Bay Campground and stop the unnecessary
destruction of an ecologically fragile wildlife habitat, turtle nesting area and the overcrowding of a section of beach which is
already experiencing a heavy load of traffic from adjacent clusters of established residents already using the affected area
Printed Name
Signature
Address
Comment
Date
Robert Gillett
120 Dock St. Rogers Bay
9 ao�
/
30 J��
2 is E4,/d
7 5 w
DOu J k /�✓
peu
iJ
') FREGFIVED
q9-20-/
�w
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
j
OCT 2 12014
A1�1ot N_/�iR1c

i
MEN
i
its
•
,►i...
1 � •
�'
�_1��,
%!�.f✓d!%!L
F d EIVED
u�..�DCMWILMINGTON,
OCT 2 12014
NC

Petition to Stop North Topsail Beach from Establishing a Parking Lot and Beach
Crossover on Highway 210 Directly Across From Rogers Bay
Petition Summary and At the present time there are 442 property owners across the street and 35 apartments in the ST Moritz condo adjacent to the o e
Background: proposed site w ' h currently use the beach in this area. The town of NTB is planning to construct a parking lot of a capacity of w o
approximatel/J t nrs which will be devastating to the vegetation, bird population and on the beach side the established turtle
nesting area. The available beach area at high tide in this section is less than 20 ft and is already overpopulated on most r
weekends in the summer. o
--Action For: We, the undersigned, are concerned citizens who urge the Coastal Area Management Association to act now to reject the
North Topsail proposed Parking Lot on Highway 210 directly in front of Rogers Bay Campground and stop the unnecessary
destruction of an ecologically fragile wildlife habitat, turtle nesting area and the overcrowding of a section of beach which is
already experiencing a heavy load of traffic from adjacent clusters of established residents already using the affected area
'®
120 Dock St. Rogers Bay
WIN
rfc :�GtVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
0 C T 2 12014

/
mwmr
�m-
�/'_1 �I'/
L'. �`I/iRiowIVr am%/�'
' S' 1/ �� // �:
.l
/
d.t l "a [Q t.
y
v
v RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 2 1 2014

Petition to Stop North Topsail Beach from Establishing a Parking Lot and Beach
Crossover on Highway 210 Directly Across From Rogers Bay
o A 8
Petition Summary and At the present time there are 442 property owners across the street and 35 apartments in the ST Moritz condo adjacent to the IK _
Background: proposed site which currently use the beach in this area. The town of NTB is planning to construct a parking lot of a capacity of L
approximately 150 cars which will be devastating to the vegetation, bird population and on the beach side the established turtle c
nesting area. The available beach area at high tide in this section is less than 20 ft and is already overpopulated on most
weekends in the summer.
Action Petitioned For: We, the undersigned, are concerned citizens who urge the Coastal Area Management Association to act now to reject the
North Topsail proposed Parking Lot on Highway 210 directly in front of Rogers Bay Campground and stop the unnecessary
destruction of an ecologically fragile wildlife habitat, turtle nesting area and the overcrowding of a section of beach which is
already experiencing a heavy load of traffic from adjacent clusters of established residents already using the affected area.
Printed Name
Si nature
Address
Comment
Date
Z'
etpi v ,j ,6P;4oY
o2 c l S k ee L
36
P i t
q3
Ld It x
/BLS Rel2k
3
D
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
O C T 2 12014

Printed Name
Signature
Address
�o
Comment
bi
D- ->
6 - -1 �(
c ci e4
L Ts7 % S�(
r c::;tIVEU
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 212014

DCMWI�MINV
ou 2 11014
jt �� /,,,a �'I f4e
'U , 4aa
vM^