27-15 NC Coastal Federation

Sermit Class Permit Number
NEW 27-15
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and y
Coastal Resources Commissiono�rOQ
41*r tt
for
X Major Development in an Area of Environmental Concern
pursuant to NCGS I I3A-118
X Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229
Issued to N.C. Coastal Federation 128 Grenville Street, Manteo, NC 27954
Authorizing development in Dare County adi. to Pamlico Sound, Shallowbag Bay. and
Broad Creek , as requested in the permittee's application dated 10/2/14 including the
�
attached workplan drawings (12) 6 dated received in MHD City on 12/18/14 and 6 dated 10/27/14
This permit, issued on February 26, 2015 , is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent
with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may
x subject to tines, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be nun ana voio.
1) In accordance with the permittee's email dated 2/26/15, the proposal to create an oyster reef structure
located in Scarborough Creek is hereby removed from this project. Any reference to the proposed
oyster reef structure in the attached application is hereby null and void.
Oyster Reefs
2) Unless specifically altered herein, this permit authorizes the construction the oyster reef structures that
are depicted on the attached workplan drawings.
3) The alignment of the oyster reef structures shall be staked by the permittee and approved on site by a
representative of the Division of Coastal Management within a maximum of 30 days prioarttiftstart of
any construction.
APR 0 2 1015
This permit action may be appealed by the permittee or
other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the issuing
date.
This permit shall be accessible on -site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification not covered
hereunder requires further Division approval.
All work shall cease when the permit expires on
December 31, 2018
In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees
that your project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal
Management Program.
nrWA-Wnd bits
Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DENR and the
Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission.
I
�—� Braxton C. Davis, Director
Division of Coastal Management
This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted.
Signature of Permittee

N.C. Coastal Federation Permit # 27-15
Page 2 of 3 `
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
4) All reef shall be free from loose dirt or any pollutant. It shall be of a size sufficient to prevent
its movement from the approved alignment by wave or current action.
5) The oyster reefs shall be marked with PVC pipes every 50 feet and the outer boundaries shall be marked
with yellow reflectors extending at least three feet above normal high water level.
6) The permittee shall post signs indicating that the oyster reef structures located in outer Shallowbag Bay
and Thicket Lump are research projects and are closed to shellfish harvest.
7) Unless specifically altered herein, monitoring and reporting requirements listed in the narrative dated
10/27/14 shall be implemented and provided to the Division of Coastal Management.
General
8) No Coastal Wetlands, submerged aquatic vegetation, and oysters shall be excavated or filled, even
temporarily.
9) This permit does not grant any property rights or exclusive privileges.
10) The permittee understands and agrees that, if future operations by the United States requires the
removal, relocation, or other alteration of the structure or work authorized by this permit, or if in the
opinion of the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative, said structure or work shall cause
unreasonable obstruction to free navigation of the navigable waters, the permittee will be required, upon
due notice from the Corps of Engineers, to remove, relocate or alter the structural work or obstructions
caused thereby, without expense to the United States or the state of North Carolina. No claim shall be
made against the United States or the state of North Carolina on account of any such removal or
alteration.
11) The permittee shall maintain the authorized work in good condition and in conformance with the terms
and conditions of this permit. The permittee is not relieved of this requirement if he abandons the
permitted activity without having it transferred to a third party.
12) This permit shall not be assigned, transferred, sold, or otherwise disposed of to a third party without the
written approval of the Division of Coastal Management.

N.C. Coastal Federation Permit # 27-15
Page 3 of 3
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
NOTE: This permit does not eliminate the need to obtain any additional state, federal or local permits,
approvals or authorizations that may be required.
NOTE: Future development of the permittee's property may require a modification of this permit.
Contact a representative of the Division at [phone] prior to the commencement of any
such activity for this determination. The permittee is further advised that many non -water
dependent activities are not authorized within 30 feet of the normal high water level.
NOTE: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has assigned the proposed project COE Action Id. No. SAW-
2015-00139.
NOTE: An application processing fee of $400 was received by DCM for this project.
RECEIVED
APR 0 2 ID15
Fn.Wkwhun cm

Permit Class
NEW
Permit Number
27-15
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and
X Major Development in an Area of Environmental Concern
pursuant to NCGS 113A-118
X Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229
Issued to N.C. Coastal Federation, 128 Grenville Street, Manteo NC 27954
Authorizing development in Dare County adi to Pamlico Sound, Shallowbag Bay, and
Broad Creek , as requested in the permittee's application dated 10/28/14 , includingthe
he
attached workman drawings (12)6 dated received in MHD City on 12/18/14 and 6 dated 10/27/14
This permit, issued on February 26, 2015 is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent
with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may
be subject to fines, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be nun ano vow.
1) In accordance with the permittee's email dated 2/26/15, the proposal to create an oyster reef structure
located in Scarborough Creek is hereby removed from this project. Any reference to the proposed
oyster reef structure in the attached application is hereby null and void.
Oyster Reefs
2) Unless specifically altered herein, this permit authorizes the construction the oyster reef structures that
are depicted on the attached workplan drawings.
3) The alignment of the oyster reef structures shall be staked by the permittee and approved on site by a
representative of the Division of Coastal Management within a maximum of 30 days prior to the start of
any construction.
This permit action may be appealed by the permittee or
other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the issuing
date.
This permit shall be accessible on -site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification not covered
hereunder requires further Division approval.
All work shall cease when the permit expires on
December 31, 2018
In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees
that your project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal
Management Program.
Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DENR and the
Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission.
Cp p'
o.
—'� Braxton C. Davis, Director
Division of Coastal Management
This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted.
Signature of Permittee

N.C. Coastal Federation Permit i# 27-15'
Page 2 of 3
ADDITIONAL, CONDITIONS
4) All reef material shall be free from loose dirt or any pollutant. It shall be of a size sufficient to prevent
its movement from the approved alignment by wave or current action.
5) The oyster reefs shall be marked with PVC pipes every 50 feet and the outer boundaries shall be marked
with yellow reflectors extending at least three feet above normal high water level.
6) The permittee shall post signs indicating that the oyster reef structures located in outer Shallowbag Bay
and Thicket Lump are research projects and are closed to shellfish harvest.
7) Unless specifically altered herein, monitoring and reporting requirements listed in the narrative dated
10/27/14 shall be implemented and provided to the Division of Coastal Management.
General
8) No Coastal Wetlands, submerged aquatic vegetation, and oysters shall be excavated or filled, even
temporarily.
9) This permit does not grant any property rights or exclusive privileges.
10) The permittee understands and agrees that, if future operations by the United States requires the
removal, relocation, or other alteration of the structure or work authorized by this permit, or if in the
opinion of the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative, said structure or work shall cause
unreasonable obstruction to free navigation of the navigable waters, the permittee will be required, upon
due notice from the Corps of Engineers, to remove, relocate or alter the structural work or obstructions
caused thereby, without expense to the United States or the state of North Carolina. No claim shall be
made against the United States or the state of North Carolina on account of any such removal or
alteration.
11) The permittee shall maintain the authorized work in good condition and in conformance with the terms
and conditions of this permit. The permittee is not relieved of this requirement if he abandons the
permitted activity without having it transferred to a third party.
12) This permit shall not be assigned, transferred, sold, or otherwise disposed of to a third party without the
written approval of the Division of Coastal Management.

i
N.C. Coastal Federation Permit # 27-15
Page 3 of 3
ADDITIONAL, CONDITIONS
NOTE: This permit does not eliminate the need to obtain any additional state, federal or local permits,
approvals or authorizations that may be required.
NOTE: Future development of the permittee's property may require a modification of this permit.
Contact a representative of the Division at [phone] prior to the commencement of any
such activity for this determination. The permittee is further advised that many non -water
dependent activities are not authorized within 30 feet of the normal high water level.
NOTE: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has assigned the proposed project COE Action Id. No. SAW-
2015-00139.
NOTE: An application processing fee of $400 was received by DCM for this project.

A Novel Use for Abandoned Crab Pots:
Upcycling Pots to Create Oyster Reefs in Pamlico Sound
Applicant: N.C. Coastal Federation
Project Narrative
Prepared: October 27, 2014
by Erin Fleckenstein
Background
Oyster reefs are in decline on a global scale. Recent reports (Beck et al., 2009; Shellfish
Reefs at Risk: A Global Analysis of Problems and Solutions) indicate that reefs are at
approximately 15% of historic levels. In North Carolina there has been a concentrated
effort to protect and restore oysters in our sounds. Oysters are an essential fish habitat
providing a number of ecosystem services from creating reefs that provide habitat for
other estuarine creatures, to filtering water in the sound (one adult oyster can filter up to
50 gallons of water a day), to acting as an important food source valuable to the economy
and coastal cultural. Since 2002, the federation has participated in a number of efforts to
restore oysters in the sound.
Many oyster restoration projects rely on the use of oyster shell or other calcium carbonate
substrate, such as limestone marl for successful restoration. Oyster shell is becoming an
increasingly rare resource. A novel material and approach to restoring oysters has recently
come to our attention.
In South Carolina and Virginia researchers are working to remove abandoned crab pots
from the sounds and rivers and then convert the reclaimed pots into oyster habitat. This
work has been accomplished with considerable success. Please see attached report frIVED
Dr. Peter Kingsley -Smith of SC DNR on the project process and progress. DEC 18 1n4
Coastal Federation Project DrM-MHD CITY
This idea of collecting abandoned gear and upcycling it to oyster reefs caught the attention
of the N.C. Coastal Federation at a national conference in 2012. In 2013 the federation
applied for grants from NOAKs marine debris removal program and North Carolina Sea
Grant to be able to replicate this project in North Carolina. The grants were awarded to the
federation. The funding allows for two years of pot collection from the Pamlico Sound and
Crab Pots to Oyster Reefs Permit Narrative October 27, 2014

converting the reclaimed pots to oyster reefs. Project partners include: N.C. Marine Patrol,
NC SeaGrant, The Nature Conservancy, National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration,
National Park Service, Town of Manteo, Wildlife Resources Commission, local fishermen,
and local volunteers.
In January 2014,17 fishermen were hired to collect crab pots from approximately 180,000
acres of Pamlico Sound. The fishermen worked alongside N.C. Marine Patrol officers and
volunteers. They were successful in collecting 4,930 pounds of derelict fishing gear. Of the
349 pots that were collected, 110 of them were considered suitable for converting to reef
material. This clean-up effort will occur again in 2015 and if additional grants are secured
could continue for several years to come.
Converting the Pots
It is the federation's intent to replicate the success of the South Carolina Department of
Natural Resources by converting pots to reef material. It is also the federation's intent to
compare the success of creating oyster reefs from coated crab pots vs. a more traditional
bagged shell reef construction.
To prepare the pots for use as oyster reef material, the pots are power washed and
cleaned of all debris. All vents are closed so that they are no longer able to ghost fish. Then
the pots are covered in a ceramic tile mortar: MAPEI Gray Powder Polymer -Modified
Mortar, which provides the substrate for oyster larvae to settle on. Each pot will weigh
approximately 50 pounds when coated and measure 2x2x2 feet. The pots are allowed to
fully cure (3-4 weeks) prior to deploying them at their reef location.
Preparing a Typical Shell bag or Marl bag
In order to compare the recruitment and feasibility of using crab pots as a reef v.
traditional shell material as a reef, the federation proposes to construct shell bag/marl bag
reefs at the selected locations. These bags are prepared by using nylon mesh material and
filling them with approximately Yz- 3/4 of a bushel of either shell or marl to create a final
bag with measurements of 2'x6"x 8"weighing approximately 35-50 pounds when
constructed. The bags are then stacked on top of one another in a pyramid type structure
to create the overall desired dimensions of the reef. Please see attached drawings for RECEIVED
more details.
DEC 18 2014
Site Selection and New Reef Locations 0--olmom)-i'
The four potential reef sites have been selected based on the knowledge and input of local
watermen, Division of Marine Fisheries, Nature Conservancy, National Park Service, Coastal
Federation, South Carolina Department of Natural Resources and university researchers
Crab Pots to Oyster Reefs Permit Narrative October 27, 2014

from UNC Institute of Marine Science. The sites were selected with the following criteria in
mind:
1) oyster recruitment success- proposed reef locations were selected because they
would support oyster populations and/or are in close proximity to other areas
known to support native oyster population;
2) presence of SAV- the footprint of proposed reefs was sited so that there were no
impacts to SAV beds (DMF staff assisted with an SAV site survey on August 28, 2014,
please see attached results from survey);
3) bottom type- bottom type was selected so that it was neither too hard nor too soft.
This will be ideal for allowing the pots to settle and develop into oyster reefs and
was a recommendation from SCDNR;
4) user conflicts- potential reef sites were selected so that they are out of navigational
channels (marked or otherwise) and do not conflict with known fishing activities or
other recreational uses;
5) site energy- the wave and current energy of the proposed location was considered.
We did not want a site that had extreme current or waves. Sites selected are in
calmer waters and will allow for the pots to be in a secure, stable location.
At this time it is the intent of the federation to deploy crab pots and/or bagged oyster shell
(or marl) at four potential locations in and around the waters of Roanoke Island in Dare
County, NC, please see attached locator map. Two sites are located in Shallowbag Bay and
two sites are located on the southern end of Roanoke Island. In spring 2015, upcycled pots
and/or bagged shell will be deployed at each of the four locations. Deployment timing is
dependent on when permits are received and volunteer availability.
We currently have 110 pots ready for deployment and plan to purchase 500 bushels of
shell and marl to bag and deploy. The federation is requesting to permit a larger foot print
area than we currently have material to fill. This will allow the federation to build out the
reefs sites as success in oyster restoration is shown as long as the permit remains active.
The federation will maintain close coordination with DCM, DMF and others as needed when
additional materials are planned for deployment. RECEIVED
DEC 1 R n,A
Reef Construction
DCM-MHC C:nv
The federation will use volunteers and local fishermen to deploy the reef material. Four
potential reef locations have been selected; two in the waters around southern Roanoke
Island and two in Shallowbag Bay (see specific site descriptions below for more detail). At
all four sites, the pots, shell/marl and volunteers will be transported via boat (Jones
Crab Pots to Oyster Reefs Permit Narrative October 27, 2014

Brothers 24' or something similar) to the proposed location and then deployed in the
water. Land access is not required. Boats will be anchored offshore during deployment.
Once at the site, the pots will be placed in the water and then secured with Yr3/8" rebar,
measuring -2ft long, with a hook in one end. The rebar will be driven to secure the pot in
place. The pots will be placed next to each other in a checkerboard pattern and the corners
of the pots will be hog -ringed or zip tied together. Using the rebar and securing the pots
together with hog rings/zip ties will limit the potential for the pots to roll. If the pots roll, the
federation will take additional steps to secure the pots or they will be removed from the
site by the federation and/or its volunteers. At each site 3-4 reefs will be constructed with
10-20' between the reefs for a total length of 150-200' of reef. A maximum of 50 pots will be
used in each SOx10' footprint of a reef. Please see attached drawings for more specifics.
To compare the success of crab pots as oyster reef material to traditional reef building
materials (oyster shell/marl), bagged oyster shell/marl will be deployed and monitored to
compare reef colonization and growth. Bagged oyster shell/marl, weighting approximately
35-50 pounds and measuring 6"x 8"x 2' will be stacked on top of each other to create a
more traditional reef structure. Bagged marl will be placed on the bottom of the reef with
bagged shell used as a "veneer" or "top dressing'. Because shell is in such demand, it will
only be used on the top and outer layer of the sill and marl will be used as a "sacrificial"
layer underneath. Please see attached diagram for more information. The success of the
bagged oyster shell reef will be used to compare the recruitment and growth of the new
crab pot reef structure.
The sites that have been selected show water depths of 28-41" on a normal water day. It is
expected that the pots and bagged oysters will be submerged most of the time with 4-17"
of water above the tops of the reefs (depending on the site). However, on strong wind tides
the reefs may be partially or wholly exposed. The corners of the permitted reef will be
identified with PVC poles and reflective tape. Additional markers will be placed every 50
feet along the reef (please see attached site diagram). Markers with reflective tape will
extend a minimum of 3' above MHW to be easily seen and clearly identify the reef area.
Within the permitted footprint the pots and/or bags of shell will be placed to create reefs of
maximum dimensions: 10x50'. At each site 3-4 reefs will be created to a maximum of 200,
x10', variations in length of total footprint based on site. Please see attached diagram for
site specific detail. Within each reef, pots will be arranged in a checkerboard pattern and
bags may be up to five bags wide (1 C'). A maximum footprint for the four proposed sites is
750 linear feet by 10 feet wide (or 0.33 acres for the entire project). RECEIVED
DEC 18 2014
DCM-MH©C"
Crab Pots to Oyster Reefs Permit Narrative October 27, 2014

Monitorine
The federation will monitor the reefs at a minimum on an annual basis and after any major
storms to make sure that they remain intact and have not become a nuisance. This
monitoring will be conducted for at least 3 years after the project is complete or until the
reefs are established. In addition to monitoring their security, the federation will also
monitor the pots and bagged shell for oyster colonization and growth. This will be done by
estimating percent cover of oysters and measuring a subset of the oysters for their heights.
The federation also hopes to monitor fish use of the reefs but a monitoring technique for
this has not yet been determined. And finally, the federation plans to measure the distance
of the reef to the adjacent marsh. The reefs will all be located at least 15' from the adjacent
shoreline. Any changes in this distance (either positive or negative) will be noted. A report
of maintenance activities and monitoring results will be made available to DCM or others
as requested.
Oyster Harvest
It is the federation's hope and intent that these reefs will develop into productive oyster
reefs. If the crab pot reefs mature (support legal sized oysters) and are located in approved
shellfishing waters (only the Broad Creek Site meets this criteria), they will be open to hand
harvest after three years. For the pots this method of harvest will keep the majority of the
oysters in place and will rely on harvesting the oysters encrusting the outside of the pots.
The South Carolina experience has been that many oysters grow on the interior of the
pots. This means that the pots maintain their structural integrity and the majority of the
oyster reef remains, even if the exterior is harvested. The bagged oyster shells will only be
deployed in areas where harvest is not approved as they will likely not withstand harvest.
Existing Site Conditions
There are no existing permits for this work. This work is not part of any required mitigation.
Sites selected for oyster reef restoration are unvegetated sandy to muddy bottom in 24-43"
of water. Salinities support oyster growth and sites selected are near existing oyster
patches. Reefs would be constructed 10-40' off shore (varies by reef location) outside of
any known user conflicts.
RECEIVED
DEC 1 R In't
DCM-MHD CITY
Crab Pots to Oyster Reefs Permit Narrative October 27, 2014

Specific Site Conditions
The four sites selected and details of the sites are included below:
OUTER SHALLOWBAG BAY
A top priority site that the federation has selected is referred to as the Outer Shallowbag
Bay Site.
This site is located adjacent to State Owned property. Parcel #024395000. The reef is
proposed to be an average of 20' off shore from the state owned land. Water depth is 36-
40" deep. No SAV is located at the site. Salinities have been measure at 13 ppt. The staff
from Division of Marine Fisheries conducted a site survey and results are attached to this
permit narrative. The proposed reef would measure 10' wide and extend along the length
of the shoreline for approximately 200'. This site would be constructed of both crab pots
and oyster shell bags. Approximately two 40' crab pot reefs and two 40' oyster shell bag
reefs with 10-20' between the reefs would be constructed at this site.
This site is well protected from the majority of wind directions and is located in close
proximity to the federation's Manteo office, which will facilitate monitoring of the reef.
Bottom type is a peaty/muddy bottom. Oysters should do well to colonize and form an
oyster reef in this location on both the pots and bags. This site will not be open to harvest
as it is in closed waters.
SCARBOROUGH CREEK
Also in Shallowbag Bay is a site referred to as the Scarborough Creek site. This site is
adjacent to land privately owned by Ella Planter. Parcel # 025727003. The reef is proposed
to be approximately 10-30' off shore and in waters 24-40" deep. The reef would measure
10' wide and extend along the length of the shoreline for approximately 150'. This site has
been selected also for its location as a safe place, with a soft/muddy bottom that will
secure the pots. Low current and wave energy at this site makes it a good location for
placing the pots and shell bags. Salinities have been measured at this site ranging from 6-
18 ppt. Local recreational fishermen have indicated that this would be a prime location to
place the pots and create habitat for enhanced fishing opportunities. It is near Scarborough
Creek but well out of the un-marked navigation channel that local recreational boaters use
to access the Scarborough Creek homes/docks. In addition, no SAV is noted at the site by
Division of Marine Fisheries. The site is located in close proximity to the federation's
Manteo office which will facilitate maintenance and monitoring of the reef.
RECEIVED
DEC 18 MA
Crab Pots to Oyster Reefs Permit Narrative DCM-MHDCOV October 27, 2014

This site would be constructed of approximately two 40' crab pot and one 40' oyster shell
bag reefs with 10-20' between the reefs. This site will not be open to harvest as it is in
closed waters,
BROAD CREEK
The third site selected for reef construction is referred to as Broad Creek. This site is
adjacent to land owned by the State of North Carolina that is undeveloped coastal marsh
(Sportino alterniflora dominated). Parcel #025884002. The reef is proposed to be an average
of 30' offshore. Water depth is 28-40" deep. No SAV is indicated at the site. Salinities have
not been measured at this site, but nearby natural oyster reefs have been documented
indicating ideal conditions for oyster growth. The staff from Division of Marine Fisheries
have indicated there is no SAV located at this site. The close proximity to existing oyster
beds will facilitate natural recruitment to this constructed reef.
The proposed reef would measure 1 C' wide and extend along the length of the shoreline
for approximately 200'. This site would be constructed of up to four crab pot reefs 10 x4C'.
If the reef grows as planned, it may be open to harvest as it is in approved shellfishing
waters.
This site is located directly across from the entrance to Wanchese Harbor. It is protected
from the majority of wind directions.
THICKET LUMP
The fourth proposed reef location is referred to as Thicket Lump. This site is adjacent to
undeveloped coastal marsh (dominated byJuncus roemarianus) owned by Metropolitan
Designs Incorporated. Parcel #025898000. The reef is proposed to be an average of 20'
offshore from the land. Water depth is 24-38". No SAV is indicated at the site. Salinities
have measured at 13 ppt. This site is in close proximity to existing natural oyster beds
which will facilitate natural recruitment to this constructed reef. The proposed reef would
measure 10' wide and extend along the length of the shoreline for approximately 200'. It
would be constructed of approximately two 40' shell bag reefs and two 40' crab pot reefs.
This site would be closed to harvest as it is not in approved shellfishing waters.
The site is located on the southern end of Roanoke Island in the marshes of Wanchese. It is
in a well -protected location and the bottom is firm but muddy which is ideal for reef RECEIVED
construction. It is protected from the majority of wind directions and out of any DEC 18 ?nu
navigational channels.
DCM-MHD CITY
Crab Pots to Oyster Reefs Permit Narrative October 27, 2014

RECEIVED
DEC 18 7^'h
DCM-MHD CITY

ACM Mr-1
APPLICATION for
Maier Development Permit
(last revised 12J271Q6)
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1. Primary Applicantl Landowner Information
Business Name
Project Name (if applicable)
N.C. Coastal Federation
A Novel Use for Abandoned Crab Pots: Upcycling Pots to
Create Oyster Reefs in Pamlico Sound
Applicant 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Erin
L
Fleckenstein
Applicant 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Todd
Miller
If additional applicants, please attach an additional pages) with names listed.
Mailing Address O
Box
City
State
128 Grenville Street I
Manteo
NC
ZIP
Country
Phone No.
FAX No.
27954
USA
252-473-1607
ext.
252-473-2402
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
[e-mail]; [e-mail]
Z Agenti"Contractor Information
Business Name
Same As Above
RECEIVED
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
DEC 18 7014
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name—�
MI
Last Name
96M-MN9 CITY
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
ZIP
Phone No. 1
Phone No. 2
-
- ext.
-
ext.
FAX No.
Contractor p
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
<Form continues on back>

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 2 of 6)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
RECEIVED
DEC 18 nu
BCMI-WHM C-"
252-808-2808 .. 1-888-4RCOAST .. www.ncanastilminigoment.net

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 3 of 6)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
3. Project Location
County (can be multiple)
Street Address
State Rd. III
Dare
NIA: will take place in submerged waters of Pamlico Sound
Subdivision Name
City
—
State
Zip
Phone No.
Lot No.(s) (if many. attach additional page with list)
- - ext.
I ,
-
a. In which NC river basin is the project located?
.--........ _....._........_.........
b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
Pasquotank River Basin
Pamlico Sound, Thicket Lump, Broad Creek, Shallowbag
Bay
c. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade?
d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
®Natural ❑Manmade []Unknown
Pamlico Sound
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
f. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
Elves ®No
work falls within.
Dare County
4. Site Description
a.
Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.)
b. Size of entire tract (Sq.ft.)
NIA- project to take place in public trust waters
N/A
e.
Size of individual lot(s)
d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
N/A, I I
NWL (normal water level)
(If many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list)
N/A ❑NHW or ❑NWL
e.
Vegetation on tract
N/A
RECEIVED
f.
Man-made features and uses now on tract
N/A DEC 18 2014
Bf?M-MHB eITY
g.
Identify and describe the existing land uses adjacent to the proposed project site.
The proposed oyster reef locations are sited in the water 1540' feet from the nearest shoreline. The adjacent properties are
undeveloped coastal marsh owned by the State of North Carolina or private landowners.
In.
How does local government zone the tract?
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
water
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
❑Yes ❑No ®NA
j.
Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? ❑Yes ®No
k.
Hasa professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. ❑Yes ®No ®NA
If yes, by whom?
1.
Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a ❑Yes No (DNA
National Register listed or eligible property?
Form continues on next page>
net

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 4 of 6)
APPLICATION for
Major Deveiopment'Permit
m. (i) Are there wetlands on the site?
(if) Are there coastal wetlands on the site?
(iii) If yes to either (i) or (ii) above, has a delineation been conducted?
(Attach documentation, if available)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
none
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
none
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems.
none
❑Yes
❑Yes ®No
5. Activities and Impacts
a. Will the project be for commercial, public.. or private use? ❑Commercial ®Public/Government
❑Private/Community
b. Give a brief description of purpose, use. and daily operations of the project when complete.
The proposed project is intended to assist in statewide efforts to restore depleted oyster populations in Pamlico Sound. The
sites selected will be open to the public for educational purposes, recreational fishing opportunities and where appropriate
oyster harvest. Please see attached narrative for more detail.
c. Describe the proposed construction methodol s of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each
P P o9Y� IYPe9 type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
The project will be constructed with volunteers and project partners using upcycled crab pots and bagged oyster shell.
Materials will be delivered to the proposed reef locations with John boats, skiffs and other small watercraft. Where used,
bagged shell will be stacked on top of each other to create a low -profile reef. Where used, upcycled crab pots will be
secured with 3/8 inch rebar driven into the sediment 2 feet at the corners. Adjacent pots will be hog -ringed or zip -tied
together to further secure them in place. Please see narrative and drawings for more details.
dListall development activities you propose.
No development proposed; this is an oyster restoration project.
e. Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? new work
f. What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project? no land is being disturbed as part of
this project. Total reef footprint
proposed is not to exceed 0.33
acres ❑Sq.Pt or ®Acres
g. Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
that the public has established use of? RECEIVE
h. Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state. DEC 18 %g
no discharges proposed
I. Will wastewater or stonnwater be discharged into a wetland? ❑Yes ONO ®NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water? ❑Yes ❑No ®NA
I. Is there any mitigation proposed? ❑Yes ONO ®NA
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal.
Y

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 5 of 6)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
<Form continues on back>
8. Additional Information
In addition to this completed application form, (MP-1) the following items below, if applicable, must be submitted in order for the application
package to be complete. Items (a) — (1) are always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
instruction booklet on how to property prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
d. A copy of the deed (with stale application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
I. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management,
Name State Property Office: Tim Walton, General Manager Phone No. 919 $07.4650
Address PO Box 629 Raleigh, NC 27602 or 1321 Mai) ServiceCenter Raleigh, NC 27699
Name Ella Planter Phone No. Not available
Address 7960 Mountain Falls Ct. Apt 102 Raleigh, NC 27617
Name Metropolitan Designs Incorporated Phone No. Not available
Address 3204 Ferdlillah Ln Raleigh, NC 27610
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers.. permittee. and issuing dates.
none known
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form. 'd applicable.
i. Wetland delineation, 6 necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10).. if necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
7. Certification and Permission to Enter on Land
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Date I CA P-t I ! c} Print Name V
Signature RECEIVED
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed project. DEC 18 ?MA
JZDCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information ❑DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts DCM &0 C@11
❑DCM MP-3 Upland Development
❑DCM MP-4 Structures Information
252-808-2308 .. 1-688-4RCO4.i' .. w m- v,;. nc cro,- is 1 mana ge nt ent. net

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 6 of 6)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
RECEIVED
DEC 18 ?nu
�M=MN9 P-iry
252-808-2808 .i 1-888-4RCOAST .. www.nCC0asta3mana9ement,net

Form DCM MP-2
EXCAVATION and FILL
(Except for bridges and culverts)
NOV 2 5 2014
..:k...-t
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be St te`fb complete aft other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation and/or fill activities. All values should be given in feet.
Access
Other
Channel
(NLW or
Canal
Boat Basin
Boat Ramp
Rock Groin
Rock
Breakwater
(excluding
shoreline
NWL
stabilization
Length
750
—
— —
10
Width
Avg. Existing
NA
NA
36"
Depth
Final Project
NA
NA
same
:l
Depth
1. EXCAVATION ®This section not applicable
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or NWL in b. Type of material to be excavated,
cubic yards.
c. (i) Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlandslmarsh
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB _
❑WL ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas*
d. High -ground excavation in cubic yards.
12. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL ®This section not applicable
a. Location of disposal area. b. Dimensions of disposal area.
c. (i) Do you claim title to disposal area?
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA
(n) If no.. attach a letter granting permission from the owner.
e. (i) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh
(CW). submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB _
❑WL ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of disposal in these areas:
d. (i) Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance?
❑Yes ❑No DNA
(ii) If yes, where?
f. (i) Does the disposal include any area in the water?
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA
III) If yes, how much water area is affected?
RECEIVED
DEC 18 2W
9QM-'MHB eflY
232-33�T-2dCM i.P88-x2r.:JFa7 .,:wa•.. Ear. �o�iu7ra .nage:rr��nL�x t_. v;s2ciz 11':26i66

7---ttz n(7r1 i` "P-? + , a,od Pill, Page 2 of 3}
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION ® This section not applicable
(It development is a wood groin, use MP-4 — Structures)
a. Type of shoreline stabilization: b. Lenoth:
❑Bulkhead ❑Riprap ❑Breakwater/Sill ❑Other:
c. Average distance waterward of NHW or NWL:
e. Type of stabilization material:
g. Number of square feet of fill to be placed below water level.
Bulkhead backfill _ Riprap _
Breakwater/Sill Other
i. Source of fill material.
Width:
d. Maximum distance waterward of NHW or NWL:
f. (i) Has there been shoreline erosion during preceding 12
months?
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA
(it) If yes, state amount of erosion and source of erosion amount
information.
h. Type of fill material.
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES ❑This section not applicable
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. (i) Will fill material be brought to the site? ®Yes ❑No ❑NA
If yes,
(ti) Amount of material to be placed in the water _
(iii) Dimensions of fill area 750' x 10' x 2'
(iv) Purpose of fill
The fill to be brought in is repurposed crab pots and oyster
shell to create new oyster reefs at four sites around
Roanoke Island in Dare County, NC
a. How will excavated Or fill material be kept on
controlled?
Sites selected for oyster reef creation are in lower energy or well
protected areas. ShelVmarl will be bagged in nylon mesh to
create bags of sufficient weight to remain in place. Repurposed
crab pots will be coated in mortar to create a pot of suffient
weight and then held in place by using rebar hooks driven into
the comers of the pots and pots will be hog ringed or ziptied
together to limit rolling/movement. See narrative and drawings
for more detail.
C. (i) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the project?
®Yes ❑No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, explain what type and how they will be implemented.
PVC pipe will be used to outline the reef footprints. The pipes
will be driven into the ground 3-5 feet deep at the corners of the
reef and every 50 feet along the length of the reef. At least three
feet of pipe wilt be visible above normal water level and 2"
reflective tape will be used to mark the pipes.
b. (i) Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands/marsh (OW),
submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or
other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked. provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV _ ❑SB _
OWL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the fill in these areas:
What type of construction equipment will be used (e.g., dragline.
backhoe. or hydraulic dredge)?
no construction equipment. Work will be done by volunteers using
a trash pump to help drive PVC pipe into the ground and John
Boats (or other small skiffs) to transport volunteers, materials
and equipment. No boats or equipment will be stored on site.
See narrative for more detail.
d. (i) Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project
site? ❑Yes ONO ❑NA
(tt) If yes. explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
DEC 18 ru
l3ell"l-MHOC"
252-808-2808::1 8dII-b.t 3tS? www, ncc oastal nirinagement, tie! iervised! 12,26•06

to(2-41*
Date
ro ctName
Applicant Name
Applicant Signature
RECEIVED
DEC 18 2014
DCM-MHn Plr•
,.3-26� o :: 1-868 4h';CA'5; , .4— , o r, 122606

i
mo L

1
(D
RECEIVED
DEC 18 7014
DCM-MHI) Cm
.;

RECEIVED
DEC 1 R g"'o
DCM-MHD CRY

RECEIVED
DEC 18 7MA
DCMMHD CRY

Location
Thicket Lump
Broad Creek
Outer Shallowbag Bay
Scarborough Creek
start coordinates of
waterward edge
35.823390 N 075.624490 W
35.851750 N 075.615220 W
35.917510 N 075.662540 W
35.899600 N 75.662140 W
end coordinates of
waterward edge
35.822970 N 075.624290 W
35.851290 N 075.614910 W
35.917020 N 075.662780 W
35.899480 N 075661670 W
Length of Reef
200'
200'
200'
150'
Ave. Distance from Shore
15-20'
30'
20'
20'
Environmental Suitability Data
Salinity
13 ppt
NA
6-18 ppt
6-18 ppt
Water Depth Range
24-38"
28-40"
36-40"
36-40"
Bottom Type
muddy, hard bottom
sandy, hard bottom
muddy, hard bottom
mud
Energy Level of Site
calm, protected
relatively calm
relatively calm
calm, protected
Existing Shellfish
not observed in proposed
not observed in proposed
not observed in proposed
not observed in proposed
Resources
reef footprint
reef footprint
reef footprint
reef footprint
Existing SAV or SAV
habitat
NA
NA
NA
NA
Previous Year's Site
Success
NA
NA
NA
NA
Harvest Designation
closed to shellfish harvest
SA
closed to shellfish harvest
closed to shellfish harvest
Harvest Gear Restrictions
NA
hand harvest only
NA
NA
proposed site well away from
Possible User Conflicts
none known
none known
none known
any potential navigation
channel
Reclaimed Crab Pots
Reclaimed Crab Pots (no shell
Reclaimed Crab Pots
Reclaimed Crab Pots
Construction Material
converted to Oyster Reefs
y
at this site), NC Coastal
converted to Oyster Reefs
converted to Oyster Reefs
and Source
and Bagged Oyster Shell, NC
Federation
and Bagged Oyster Shell, NC
and Bagged Oyster Shell, NC
Coastal Federation
Coastal Federation
Coastal Federation
Proposed Construction
Dates
Spring 2015
Spring 2015
Spring 2015
Spring 2015

+0l y
Yf Lz4
kta
`-^ ft k'rr•1, 1^eoj�»�d.iv .-,ir �€ 11`L w1,N�S
C . r
t'jl)Q u+-vl eA�+ t place vvte,-t C+f
+PqC-
Y1 V
• f��
t
bV
4 jta t+
come -es vf� Gr %16 QOi+

A.
#✓ile of
11 (( O u
CIO 27
1 O �
k,41`
n
�:. F✓'s•i-rn r%, ...:� �� .A3 rJ T7' �ri iP..,. a.}'1. ._..__�
u,
3 U
✓j
� t �
O
-_
r
v
6
.i��.�.._1 ; . I1,_•,f-,

s-4

oat cis
00 L--eL -sto zw
J6 a, p ",Id
,I d -31145 , Q dY
PIA

WA 6-dS
-r - - -- - - -
50 100

RECEIVED
DEC 18 lotl
DCM-MHD CITY

t,A
cc
x
LU
Cm
52 12 coo
S�j
ol
Mo

RECEIVED
DEC 18 71`1+4
D6M-Mma en

SAV/Shellfish Investigation Report
Investigation Date
8/28/2014
Applicants name
NCCF
County
Dare
Water body/location
Shallowbag Bay (Northern)
Proposed Area Size (acres)
0.09
Investigation Team
Greg Allen, Tom Wagner, Tyler Payne
Sampling Time
2:00
Gear Used
Meter Square/Rakes
Sediment Type
Hard Mud
Bottom Composition
No grass, Detritus
Depth
1.2 meters
Tidal stage
High
Tidal range
.30 meters
Wind Speed and Direction
NW 10
Exposure
East and South
Water temperature
28.3 C
Salinity
7.7 ppt.
Salinity Range
5.0 - 18.0 ppt.
Dissolved Oxygen
6.43 mg/I
Comments On SAV In or
Around Proposed location
Documented SAV to the NE of proposed area
Other Species Collected
None
Suitibility of Area for Shellfish
Cultivation
Moderate
In PNA?
No
In Polluted Area?
Yes
In MMPA?
Yes
Other Comments
Area Coordinates: 35
55.0492806 75 39.7519162 35
55.0473381 75 39.7483094 35
55.0188863 75 39.7625412 35
55.0213228 75 39.7660434
RECEIvrr
RECEIVED DEC I ft
DEC 18 7014 DCM .
onp-t AUH ".l
10/28/2014 1:43 PM

W
n
_o
C'3'
R
Q1
Q
K
O
N
t
Qs
N
E
gg � " 4
.a �` 1j '��,.�� `�
#� � A
/
� �.� �� ;:

ince the early 1900's, North Carolina's Eastern Oyster (Crassosrrea
viiVnica) population has declined an estimated 90 percent. A variety
of factors are to blame — habitat loss, pollution, diseases, and harvest
pressure. So, why should we care? Because, believe it or not, our
native oysters are one of the most important species of our estuaries.
Because of their role as a keystone species in the estuary environment,
the health of the oyster population can be considered a reflection of the
health of the ecosystem. With the loss of oysters and oyster habitat, other
aquatic species have become stressed as well. If we can restore
and protect the native oyster population, our coast will be
healthy too.
i Recognizing this, the North Carolina Coastal
Federation (NCCF) has helped to coordinate the Oyster
i Restoration and Protection Action Plan for North
Carolina. This plan represents a coordinated, concerted
r and comprehensive effort over the next five years to
protect and restore oysters in North Carolina. It includes a
number of actions suggested by scientists, fishermen,
policymakers and educators to protect and restore North
Carolina's oysters. With this in mind, NCCF has approached oyster
restoration by pursuing three strategies, including public education and
involvement, water quality protection and oyster habitat restoration.
Why restore oysters?
RECEIVED
Because of their tremendous value. The values of oysters are often DEC 1 8 7n'n
referred to as the three "Fs": Food, Filter, and Fish habitat. Oysters are
very important because the reefs they create provide critical habitat for a 7CM-MHO CITY
diverse collection of aquatic animals, including many important
commercialandrecreational fish species. One healthy oyster reef can be
home to more than an estimated 300 different organisms, like adult and

juvenile fishes, shrimp, clams and blue crabs. If the oysters are thriving, it is likely that other shelhish and
finfish that spend some part of their lifecycle in the estuary are also doing well.
Not only do oysters hold economic value by providing a commercial and recreational oyster fishery, fish
habitat, and food for the estuarine food chain and people, but they also filter the water of our sounds, bays
and tidal creeks. Oysters are filter feeders, meaning they filter out sediment, nutrients and plankton from
the water in our estuaries, thereby improving water quality. One adult oyster can filter between 25-50
gallons of water per day — so just think what a few hundred thousand could do! The final equation is very
simple ... the more oysters there are, the cleaner the water, the more habitat for a variety of aquatic
species, and the more seafood for us.
Since 1998, NCCF has been conducting oyster habitat restoration and creation projects along the
central and southern coast. These continuing efforts have resulted in over seven acres of oyster habitat
created or restored in four new oyster sanctuaries and management areas along the central and southern
coast.
NCCF's efforts have focused on the building and seeding of oyster reefs at sites along the coast Working
with researchers, oyster growers and harvesters the restoration sites have been selected and the new reefs
have been designed. in partnership with the NC Division of Marine Fisheries, over 30,000 bushels of
oyster shell have been planted at the sites, forming the base of the new reefs. Seeding of the new reefs has
been made possible by volunteers donating thousands of hours to fill over 4,000 shell bags and transport
them to new reefs for seeding. The oyster shell bags have been set with oyster larvae at J&B Aquafood, a
family -run shellfish business. When attached to the oyster shell bags and spread onto the newly laid shell
base, these oyster larvae will help to jump-start the formation of the new reefs.
NCCF's ovsier habitat restoration and creation projects have been made possible with the support of its
partners, including NOANs Community Habitat Restoration Program, FishAmerica Foundation, National
Fish and Wildlife Foundation, Restore America's Estuaries, NG Sea Grant, NC Division of Marine Fisheries,
NC Shellfish Sanitation Section, NC Division of Water Ouality, the Albemarle -Pamlico National Estuarine
Program, UNC-W and he NC Clean Water Management Trust Fund.
Reef seeding wMM June * oy$*s
North Carolina
Coastal Federation RECEIVED
DEC 18 71114
North Carolina Coastal Federation 13609 Hwy 24 (Ocean) I Newport, NC 28570
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Email: nccranocoest.org I Web: www,nocoast.org DCM-MHD CITY
The North Carolina Coastal Federation is the state's largest ran -profit waking to protect and restore coastal North Carolina. There are many exciting
opportunities to get involved in restoration projects and help preserve our coastal environment. If you would like to support our efforts, please consider
becoming an NCCF member. You also can learn about volunteer opportunities and other programs by checking out NCCF's website at www nccoast_oy call
252.393-8185, or come by NCCF headquarters at 3609 Hwy 24 in Ocean, located between Morehead City and Swansbom.
0 Pnnted on Recycled Paper

.,....._... .. .1,4
i
�.. i
SARP/NOAA Restoration Center
Subaward Final Report - - --1
Project Title:
CONSTRUCT — Creating oyster niche structures through restoration using wab4raps, -..
Award Number: 1609 —
Award Period: Oct 1" 2009 — Dec 3 1 " 2012 (12-month & 3-month no cost extensions)
Grantee Organization: South Carolina Department of Natural Resources (SCDNR)
Contact Person: Peter Kingsley -Smith, Ph.D. (Principal Investigator)
Email: kin�,sleysmithl'iiidnr.sc.cov
Phone Number: 843-953-9840
Reporting period: Oct I"2009 — December 3 1 " 2012
Final Report Narrative
I Final Results
The overarching goal of this project was to establish a SCDNR crab trap revitalization program
that converts marine debris (specifically unwanted and abandoned crab traps) with negative
ecological and aesthetic impacts into habitat that supports shellfish and finfish populations. The
success of this project was dependent upon addressing the following objectives; 1) gathering
information on the abundance and distribution of abandoned crab traps in the coastal waters of
South Carolina; 2) developing effective means of collecting and accepting abandoned and
unwanted crab traps, respectively; 3) deploying these revitalized crab traps(vents closed,
concrete coating to enhance oyster settlement) as substrate that supports oyster reef development
for its ecological services; 4) publicizing the effectiveness of this approach to habitat
enhancement through education and outreach, including the involvement of volunteers and
through the establishment of larger scale demonstration reefs.
This project resulted in the creation of new oyster reef habitat, focusing the deployment of
substrate in areas dominated by pluff mud and that are largely devoid of naturally -occurring
oyster reefs. These areas of pluff mud do not lend themselves to more `traditional' methods of
oyster reef habitat enhancement that have been widely used in South Carolina (i.e., large-scale
planting of loose shell, planting of oyster shell bags by the South Carolina Oyster Restoration
and Enhancement (SCORE) Program) due to the sinking of the substrate. As previously shown
by the SCDNR, and as demonstrated in this project, however, the use of crab traps as substrate is
an effective approach to oyster reef habitat enhancement in these areas. Oyster reefs are now
widely recognized for their recreational and commercial fisheries value but also their roles as
ecosystem engineers that support a number of important ecological services, such as shoreline
stabilization, improvements in water quality and clarity, and the provision of habitat for diverse
assemblages of finfish and invertebrates.
Objective 1: The online survey gathered a total of 60 completed surveys through the
establishment of a project -specific website hup:; iww�N -, rabtraps index.htm1.
SCDNR staff located in Columbia, SC helped Marine Resources Division (MRD) staff utilize the
program "Business Object tools" for running queries from the Oracle database that was
developed to handle the data collected by the online survey. This program allowed easier access
RECEIVEC
DEC 1 9

to and summary of the information within the completed surveys. Flyers (n = 14) were posted at
bait and tackle shops, as well as at boat landings, along the coast of South Carolina informing the
general public about our website and online survey (Figure 1).
Figure 1 (below). Illustration of the project flyer that has been posted at locations along the
coast of South Carolina to inform the general public of the negative impacts of abandoned crab
traps and to increase awareness of the project ivehsite t _ at
which they can complete the survey
dtP CArie'
HURP '
7
Abandoned
Trapset
SAR P
..s..v e s •. ,r s--•
Abandoned crab traps can pose a threat to man)sptors of marine life.
SCDNR needs Information on the location of abandoned crab traps In
our coastal waters. Once retrieved, these traps can be modified to
support the deselopment oroyster reefs. %hick In turn reduce
shoreline erosion and pros Me habitat for marsh life.
1'on can help b% uslny The follo%tog online sur%ci to reportsighting, of
abandoned crab traps
to provide information on
abandoned crab traps.
Objective 2: A grand total of 746
crab traps were collected during this
project, many of which have (n =
285) or will later be used as oyster
reef substrate as part of an ongoing
State Wildlife Grant -funded project
and a recently awarded grant to the
MRD through the NERRS Science
Collaborative. Of the 746 traps
collected by this project, 536 were
donated by commercial fishermen
and the general public, and would
likely otherwise have been destined
for the landfill. The remaining 2I0
traps were clearly abandoned in the
environment, i.e., lacked identifying
floats, were high and dry at low tide.
These abandoned crab traps were
recovered by staff from the SCDNR
(n = 135) or in collaboration with
staff from the Yawkey Wildlife
Management Area (n = 41) and
Bears Bluff National Fish Hatchery
on Wadmalaw Island (n = 34).
Figure 2 below illustrates vchere the t�\o types of reef (i.e.. experimental reefs and demonstration
reefs) have been established as a result orthis project.
Objective 3: The 285 crab traps deployed in this project were arranged either as `experimental
reefs' (n = 144) or `demonstration reefs' (n = 141). The experimental reefs were deployed as
discrete, replicated individual traps intended to facilitate the collection of data on oyster reef
"footprints" (i.e., percent live cover), oyster density per m2, and shell height. The experimental
reefs were deployed at 6 different locations (Ashley River. Charleston Harbor, Dawhoo River..
Leadenwah Creek, New Cut, and Stono River) with three sub sites each consisting of 8 traps
established at each location. The construction of the experimental reefs occurred in March -April
2011. The demonstration reefs were established as contiguous arrangements of traps in a RECEIVED
checkerboard pattern to intended to increase both the amount of surface area available for the
DEr, I R idsf
2 DCM,MeIfi
CITY

recruitment of larval oysters and the spatial complexity of the structure for finfrsh habitat.
Demonstration reefs were deliberately constructed in areas that are easily accessible to
volunteers for educational outreach purposes. The construction of the demonstration reefs
occurred in late April 2011 - May 2011. Additional traps (n = 23 per site for 3 sites) ) were
added to the demonstration reefs in the spring ol'2012 to increase reef sire through a synergistic
integration of reef -building efforts with a project supported by a State Wildliie Grant (SWG),
scheduled to continue through June 2013, that also targets crah traps for use as reef substrate to
support essential fmfish
habitat.
Figure 2 (left). Locations of
the experimental crab trap
reefs and demonstration
crab trap reefs. Within each
of these 6 deployment
locations, 3 sub -sites were
selected based on their
suitability for establishing
crab trap -based oyster reefs.
Each sub -.rite has received 8
individual revitalized crab
traps (vents closed,
concrete -coated).
Demonstration reefs now
each comprise 47 traps.
Monitoring of the
experimental began in
September 2011 and
occurred quarterly through
October 2012,
althoughquarterly
monitoring spanned several
months due to its
dependence on daytime low
tides and the time consuming
nature of this data collection
effort.
Reef "footprints", measured as percent cover of live oysters, were captured photographically
during these quarterly site visits at all of the experimental reef sites by photographing the top of
each individual cement -coated crab trap. The percent cover of live oysters for each trap was
determined using the image analysis software SigmaScan or Image J as illustrated in Figure 3
below. Images were calibrated using quadrates with attached rulers that were included in the
photographs. Data on shell height (mm) and oyster densities (oysters/mZ) were also collected
from these images approximately one year after deployment using similar techniques.
RECEIVED
DEC 18 ru
DCM-MHD CITY

Objective d: Many of the crab trap deployments and finfish sampling events were performed in
conjunction with students from the College of Charleston, volunteers from the general public,
and Bear's Bluff USFWS staff, providing them with hands on experience in oyster reef
construction and monitoring techniques, while also providing informal environmental education
opportunities to discuss topics such as habitat restoration, finfish ecology, oyster biology and
other more general environmental issues. Several professional presentations covering this
project have also been given to the restoration/scientific community (see section IX on Outreach
and Education).
Figure 3 (below). Illustration q/'the reef 'footprint " method using image analysis. A digital
image is collected of the top surface of each trap that includes a quadrate with rulers attached
and a unique label for identification (left below). Images are imported into Sigma Scan or
Image J image analysis software to determine the percent coverage of live oysters on the upper
surface of each of the crab traps (reef *footprints "), as shown in the right-hand figure below.
II. Restoration Targets and Progress
Acres / miles /
Acres / miles / metric
metric tons
Acres / miles / metric
tons projected to be
Habitat Type:
accomplished in
tons accomplished to-
completed at end of
this reporting
date (cumulative):
award:
period:
Oyster reef
N/A
0.026 acres
0.026 acres
[Note: These acreages are based upon the 285 traps deployed and a standard crab trap having a RECEIVED
footprint of 2 11 x 2 ft.]
DEC 18 1014
1I1. Permit Status
®eNI-MH® GITY
These activities were exempt from DHEC-OCRM pennitting as stated in OCRM regulation 30-
5-(A)(2): "Hunting, erecting duckblinds, fishing, shellfishing and trapping when and where
otherwise permitted by law; the conservation, replenishment and research activities of State
Agencies and educational institutions; or boating or other recreation provided that such activities
cause no material harm to flora, fauna, physical, or aesthetic resources of the area."

IV. Species Benefitting
Species that are believed to have benefitted from this project include those known to be
associated with oyster reef habitat, specifically, Eastern oysters (C'rassostrea virginica), blue
crabs (Callinectes sapidus and Callinectes similis), stone crabs (Menippe menippe), red drum
(Sciaenops ocellatus), spotted seatrout (Cynoscion nebulosus), sheepshead (Archosargus
probatocephalus), spot (Leiostomus xanthurus), black drum (Pogonias cromis), naked gobies
(Gobiosoma base) daggerblade grass shrimp (Palaemonetes spp.) and snapping shrimp (Alpheus
heterochaelis) all of which were found to be present around the crab trap reefs as part of the drop
net sampling effort (see section VII Monitoring and Maintenance Results, Finfrsh sampling to
determine habitat value, pg. 11).
V. Project Partners
Crab traps were donated by staff from the Bears Bluff National Fish Hatchery (USFWS),
Yawkey Wildlife Management Area, the SCORE Program, and the Cape Romain National
Wildlife Refuge (CRNWR). The CRNWR encompasses Bulls Bay which is known to have a
large number of abandoned crab traps contained within its boundaries. Project staff will
continue to work with these organizations, as well as South Carolina Sea Grant Consortium,
COSEE (Centers for Ocean Sciences Education Excellence), and SCDHEC-OCRM (South
Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control's Office of Ocean and Coastal
Resource Management), to reduce marine debris in the coastal waters of South Carolina.
VI. Project Timeline
The final timeline for this project (in light of the no cost extensions) was as follows:
Collection of crab traps:
Deployments of crab traps:
Quarterly site visits (document footprints):
Collection of oyster density and size data:
Drop net sampling (with volunteers)
Project ended
V1I. Monitoring and Maintenance Results
October 2010-December 2012
April -May 2011
May 2012
September -November 2011
January -April 2011
April -July 2012 RECEIVED
September -October 2012 DEC 18 20M
April -June 2012
J une-October 2012 Dem- 419 EnV
December 2012
The discrete components of the monitoring of the reef created in this project occurred during the
periods outlined in section VI above, with specific dates provided in Tables I & 3 below.
Images for the fall 2011, summer 2012 (-one year), and fall 2012 monitoring periods were
analyzed for mean percent oyster coverage and graphed in sub -site order from greatest to
smallest percentages (Figure 4). Some images were unable to be collected due to inclement
weather or poor tides. The fall 2011 and summer 2012 mean percent coverage data were natural
log transformed to meet the assumptions of normality prior to running a one-way ANOVA and
Tukey's multiple comparisons among all of the sub sites. Fall 2012 data did not need to be

transformed prior to running statistical analysis. Statistical results for sub -site differences in reef
footprints can be seen in Figure 4 by examination of the lettering associated with each site.
Table 1. Monitoring dates for determinations of percent live oyster cover "footprints".
Sub -site
Lat. (ON)
Long. (°W)
Fall 2011
Spring 2012
Summer 2012
Fall 2012
Ashley River
32.8066
79.9728
1028'2011
01/24/2012*
N/A
09/16/2012
Ashley River
32.7970
79.9758
10=28/2011
01/24/2012*
06/28/2012
09/16/2012
Ashley River 3
12.7871
79.9615
11/022011
02/07/2012*
05/16/2012
09/13/2012
Charleston Harbor
32.7676
79.9654
10,24 2011
01/25/2012*
05/0112012
10/1712012
Charleston Harbor
32.7520
79.9001
9/22/2011
01/27/2012*
04/30/2012
10/17/2012
Charleston Harbor
32.7425
798780
10/24/2011
01/24/2012*
05/01/2012
N/A
Stono Riverl
32.7738
803415
NiA
01/25/2012
05/03/2012
10/17/2012
Stono Riverl
32.7708
90.0250
11/08/2011
01/25/2012
05'032012
09 14`2012
Stono River.
32.7588
90.0107
11/08/2011
01/25/2012
05,03 2012
09,'14'2012
New Cut1
32.7185
80.1655
11/10/2011
04/03/2012
06/27/2012
10/16/2012
New Cut 2
32.7169
80.1669
11/10/2011
04/03/2012
07/18/2012
10/16/2012
New Cut 3
32.7119
80.1717
11/10/2011
04/03'2012
07/18/2012
10/16/2012
Leadenwah Creek I
32.6386
80.2061
10,2612011
02/23/2012
06/29/2012
09/17'2012
Leadenwah Creek2
32.6358
90.2060
10/26/2011
02/23/2012
06/29/2012
09/17!2012
Leadenwah Creek 3
32.6293
90.2177
10/26/2011
02/23/2012
06/29/2012
09/17/2012
Dawho River
32.6340
80..3202
11/09-'2011
02/23/2012
05/02/2012
10/15/2012
Dawho River
32.6332
80.3215
N A
0223/2012
05/02/2012
10/15/2012
Dawho River3
329293
80.3006
11092011
02232012
05101i2012
N/A
* Denotes that image analysis was not performed due to poor quality of images (traps submerged)
In order to investigate differences in mean shell heights of live oysters among sub -sites. three
experimental crab traps for each site were randomly selected using a random number generator
for numbers I through 8 to be processed for shell height (mm) and density. Each crab trap was
then divided into 4 quadrants numbered clockwise I through 4 and then one of these quadrants
was randomly selected using a random number generator for processing. Mean shell heights for
each sub site were graphed and placed in order from largest to smallest (Figure 5). A one-way
ANOVA and Tukey comparison was also performed between the sub sites to see if shell heights
were significantly different at each site. Similar statistical approaches were used to investigate
sub -site differences in oyster densities (Figure 6).
RECEIVED
DEC 1 8 7n+e
DCM-MHD C1rY

Figure 4. Mean percent oyster cover (*footprint ") data firm the fall 2011 sampling (top),
approximately one year after construction (middle). and final sampling period (bottom). Letters
above each bar represent Tukey's multiple comparison results; sub sites that share a letter were
not significantly different from one another.
140 1
A A
A
A
A
A
A B
A
B
C
D
D
E
E
F G G
120
B
B
B
B
B
B C
B
C
D
E
E
F
F
G
`w
C
C
C D
C
D
E
F
F
G
G
100
D E
D
E
F
G
G
$
80
aq
m
�
60 -
40
MIS
T
20
F4
0
t1) tS t`1 t'L t-1 tti t") �1 'L tti tN t3 tti b t-"
ee ee ze `ae `a2 `a¢, `aP b° ,az ye LJ (.° t,°o �e Lo `ae to �¢
Lt Lt Lt JP o 0 0� $at AP oo
Lec3aaec3are Aa Y\�a° S,-oO,aa'roey�°c Pso�Oa�,�,�e��e psr�z ytio°eon Stioc
yea yea eaa (ra Gra Cra
140 A A A A A A A A A A B B D C C E G F
120 8 8 B B B B B B C C E D D F G
C C C C C C D D F E E G
100 D D D D D E G F F
8 80 G
m.
m 60
e qp
20
0
aaecaarace tao arae a oe8aeat �et o Qet yaPteaet vo, let �¢``oStAt�vo� �:oe
°t
Q.t�1P1tPt�N4
o A�oaPgo
bPvpo`ocr°oP,�4 ehaQt\
P at�efi �a 1" ate
160
140
120
8 100
m 80
60
i
40
20
0
A A A A
B B B
_ C C
B C
D
E
E
E
F
E G
C D
E
F
F
F
G
F H
D E
F
G
G
G
H
G I
E F
G
H
H
H
i
H
H H 1
I i
d Pia¢ `i¢� `t P�4 Q4e
-a \ea cif c�'r ,o° h`oeo 40 �el "oe� 2e ae a�r�° S`o�° �e P',�uZA 5`0�
7
RECEIVED
DEC 18 7814
DeM-MHD CITY

For Figure 4 above (top panel), mean percent cover could not be determined from the images for
the Leadenwah Creek sub -sites 1, 2 & 3 from the fall 2011 sampling period, such that images
from the February 2012 quarterly sampling period was used instead. Images from the Ashley
River sub -site I for the one year post -deployment sampling period (middle panel) could also not
be processed, such the final sampling period was used for this figure. Images from the Dawhoo
River sub-site3 and Charleston I [arbor sub -site 3 were also unavailable for the final sampling
period (bottom panel) and were not included in this figure.
Table 2. Mean shell heights (SH in mm) and densities of live oysters (per m2) for each experiment reef
approximately one year about the deployment of the concrete -coated crab traps as substrate.
Sub -site
Sample date
Mean SH (mm)
item oyster density (per in')
Ashley River 1
09/15/2012*
24.27
347.67
Ashley River
06/28/2012
34.54
331.41
Ashley Rivera
05/16/2012
54,92
593.68
Charleston Harbor 1
05101/2012
43.96
521.21
Charleston Harbor 2
04/30/2012
42.68
614.32
Charleston Harbor 3
05/01/2012
42.21
112.70
Stono River
05/03/2012
43.95
373.90
Stono River 2
05/03/2012
30.18
347.73
Stono River
05r1,13 2012
19.93
153.45
New Cut 1
04,032012
27.60
244.34
New Cut 2
04/03/201 ^_
21.61
389.49
New Cut 3
04/03.20I2
21.58
118.05
Leadenwah Creek 1
06/29/2012
45.50
1014.06
Leadenwah Creek2
06/29/2012
44.67
1294.14
Leadenwah Creek 3
06/29/2012
41.19
1100.30
Dawho River
05/02/2012
29.90
725.98
Dawho River
05/02/2012
41.62
638.02
Dawho River 3
05,102/2012
39.13
537.66
*The Ashley River sub -site I images for the approximately one-year post -deployment time period were unavailable
to be used for image analysis (due to skewness), such that the data for the following quarterly sampling event are
shown here.
RECEIVED
DEC 18 2914
"I4 "Hn CITY

Figure 5 (below). Average shell height for each experimental reef site approximately one year
post -deployment. Letters above each bar represent Tukey's multiple comparison results; sub
sites that share a letter were not significantly different from one another.
A B B B B 8 8 8 8 C D E E E F G B G
C C C C C C C D E F F F G C
60
F 50
m 40
�MI
x¢t ee ee rot rot t,¢t ee `,¢t P `4 `,¢�
iP d Gt mat o fat fat o r Lt o �Q
s\¢ c a c4% S�oc S�Oc $oc sto° ado a a3ro pS\¢ S�Ocpeel
P aa¢ adz at�a ate¢ at�a O as O O
N,¢
Figure b (below). Mean oyster density per m' for each experimental reef site approximately one
year post -deployment. Letters above each bar represent 7'ukey's multiple comparison results;
sub sites that share a letter were not significantly different from one another.
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
A A
r B
A A
A
A A
8 B
B
B B
C C
C
C C
T D
D
D D
B
C
D
B
C
D
C C C C D D D D
D D D D
RECEIVED
DEC 18 1014
DCM-MHD CITY
'L °i 1 'r 'L 'L 115 11) N ti 1 'L
`4 `1- `4 t l t t t t t t
L<t¢¢ Lt¢¢ Gt¢¢ Q,�o Q`�¢ atro 0t,¢ Nam,¢ afro �`o @�°¢ Q,\�¢ Q't,¢
a¢c3aa¢c�ar¢ �aOa�rQ rooaa`oc ps�Oa�rooay�o �¢y4oro-R VIP VhP a¢�`o�o �ea�o P
� t t t
9

Qualitative images were also captured of these demonstration reef sites to document that these
reef structures have been successful in recruiting high numbers of oysters and supporting high
rates of oyster growth (see Figures 7 & 8 below).
Figure 8 (right).
Demonstration reef at
Hutchinson Cut created on
March 'h 2011 shown here on
May 3'd 2012, 14 months after
the deployment of the crab traps
as substrate. Image appears
courtesy of Lisa Vandiver.
NOAA Restoration Center.
Figure 7 (left). The
demonstration retfshown below
was established on April 28`h
2011 and is located in close
proximity to the SCDNR Marine
Resources Research Institute.
The photograph shown here was
taken on January 2 ih 2012, 9
months after the deployment of
the crab traps as substrate.
RECEIVED
DEC 18 7w
DCM•MHD C"

Table 5. Comparison of target. reference and realized values for structural and functional parameters of the crab
trap -based oyster reefs created during this project.
Parameter
Structural
Target
Reference
Method
Realized values -
Functional
value
value
summary
Direct counts per unit area
50%of sub -sites exceeded
Oyster density
Functional
500 m''
2,300 m"
& photography for percent
target value
live cover after 1 year
All except one sub -site
Mean —
Mean = 35
reached the mean target
Oyster size
Functionalof
20 rum
mm
Direct in situ
value; all sub -sites
(shell height)
f lax = 65
Max = 100
measurements after 1 year
the mean reference
exceed the m
Min
mm
value
Four sub -sites reached the
80%of
100%of
Photographic: presence !
p
target value, three of
Reef
Structural
deployed
deployed
e; integrity
absence: integrity traps)
which exceed the
"footprints"
area
area
amount of trap surface still
fa
reference value
exposed after 1 year
(Leadenwah Creek)
Mean number of finfish
Associated
Fish sampling (drop nets)
taxa collected around the
finfish
Functional
Fish: 5
Fish: 25
around reefs (presence vs.
crab trap reefs was greater
(nekton)
taxa
taxa
absence of nekton taxa)
than the target value (>6
species
spp.)
VIII. Community Involvement
This reporting period
To date (cumulative)
Projected for
completed award
No. of volunteers
N/A
33
20
No. of volunteer hours
N A
204
200
RECEIVED
The community was actively involved in this project through their participation in the online
survey, construction and deployment of crab traps, and their involvement in finfish sampl1w I S 1014
around the demonstration reefs. DeW-WHA RITV
IX. Outreach and Education
Volunteers were given hands on experience with habitat restoration and monitoring techniques
and were educated on the importance of oyster reefs and the negative impacts of marine debris.
On Feb 16'" 2012 Benjamin Stone gave a presentation at the SCAFS/SCFWA in Seabrook
Island, SC. On May 18th 2012 Peter Kingsley -Smith gave a lecture to the College of Charleston
Masters of Environmental Studies Conservation Biology class about oyster reefs in South
14

Table 4. Nekton (finfish, crustaceans, and molluscs) collected by drop net sampling around the demonstration reefs
(reef = with crab trap reefs; control = equivalent, adjacent area without crab trap reef) at the Bears Bluff (BB) and
Fort Johnson (FJ) sites. Data shown here are pooled from 8 sampling events completed during the summer and fall
of 2012. Individual color -coding of species relates to the life history classification described by Breitburg (1999):
reef residents (green); transients (yellow); facultative residents (orange). Other species that were found in the reef
treatment but not in the control treatment in the present study are also highlighted in pink.
REEF
CONTROL.
TAXB '.
Latin name
Cmn mmm name
RR
F.I
RR
FJ
Finish
Chaemdiprerwfab.�r
Atlantic Ypadefish
x
x
x
_x
�.__ .___--
Chdonlycrerus ¢'lmety!
�tnped burl ish
X
Chlonuconrbru., h,,,
Atlantic bumper
X
x
X
("ynosnmr nebula....
Spotted seatrout
x
x
X
Q¢s)nns whim,
I Atlantic stmcm}
X
x
ErropuS.rossmuv
Fringed flounder
x
.Anchoa hepseius
Rmadstriped anchor%
x
x
f undulus heherad,ms
Lagodon rMorhoidet
Mummichog
Pinfish
X
x
X
MM
x
Lem.,Omus=,1humv
Spot
X
x
Anchoa ma,/,dh
Ba, ' nchory
x
x
x
x
Meatdia memdia
At imic silverside
X
X
X
Mem,cirrhas wnertcanu,
Southem kmgiish
X
X
X
Mugr/ cephalus
Striped mullet
X
,Mugll curema
`.White mullet
x
Bairehella chnsaaa
Silver perch
X
x
X
X
Parerlichthvs dentams
Stwxnar Rortddet
x
x
Pwah,hthys tcthrc.I, u,..
I Scwthem noundcr
X
x
Solota =iuki
Banded nxklmiish
X
= 0erdtannlepes hr.piJm
I I lanchead filefish
x
Svntphums plagiusa
Black -cheek tonguotish
x
x
S
x
S}nodusfoerrnr
Inshore lirardfish
X
Trinectes maculalns
Ilocchuktt
X
X
Archosargw pmhameephalus
Shcepshead
x
,C""engev ocellalus
Red drum
x
'.
x
LuUmus griam
Grey snapper
X
Peprdw pare
American harvestfish
x
Prirmoms tribulw
Bighead seambin
X
Alphm hemroehw&
Bigclaw snapping shrimp
x
Shrimp
Palaemrmetes sp.
Grass shrimp
\
x
x
x
limpermeus senferw
white shrimp
x
x
x
x
Farfamepeweus acrecw
Brown shrimp
X
X
X
X
Callimcies mpulw
Atlantic blue emb
x
x
x
x
Crabs
(_allimcies .mmlh.,
Iesser blue crab
X
x
x
x
Panopew herbsth
Atlantic mud cmb
X
Molluscs
Iolhgmu Ma br errs
Atlantic bract squid
x
x
x
X
RECEIVED
13 DEC 18 1014
Bew- MM® CITY

Table 3. Sampling dates for the drop net sampling of the demonstration reefs. This method demonstrated the
finfish habitat value of these oyster reefs created using crab traps as substrate.
Site
Latitude (ON)
Longitude (ON% Sampling date
Fort Johnson
37,7520
79.9001 06/19/2012
Fort Johnson
37.7520
79.9001 07131/2012
Fort Johnson
37.7520
79.9001 09"16/2012
Fort Johnson
37.7120
79.9001 10.118/2012
Bear's Bluff
32.6454
80.2564 07'03/2012
Bear's Bluff
32.6454
802S64 08i02/2012
Bear's Bluff
32,6454
802564 08'30/2012
Hutchinson Cut'
32.6454
80.1564 07/20/2012
A list of finfish and invertebrate species caught using this drop net sampling method is shown in
'fable 4 below that includes a number of recreationally -important species found to be utilizing
this habitat, such as the spotted seatrout, Cvnoscion nebulosus.
Specific success rates were established at the beginning of this project, many of which were
reached and in some cases exceeded (see Table 5 below, pg. 14). Certain sub sites did not reach
the target oyster densities or percent coverage for reef footprints, at least not for the top surface
of the crab traps. In many cases, however, substantial numbers of oysters recruited to the interior
surfaces of the crab traps; however these oysters were not captured by the current monitoring
approach (see Figure 10 below). Consequently, it is important to note that some traps that
represent that were scored as having low percent cover may necessary have provided valuable
habitat for other organisms. The monitoring approaches for this project were non-destructive in
order to maintain the integrity of the habitat, which is why image analysis techniques were used
and focused on the more accessible exterior top surface of each trap. Oyster percent cover on the
top surface of the independent experimental crab traps varied significantly among sub -sites RECEIVED
within locations and among locations on the crab traps, which will be valuable information for
guiding future reef -building efforts using both crab traps and other techniques. DEC 18 7014
F1P.la1-ftlIMH l°it?�
Figure 10. The image below was taken
at the Charleston Harbor 2 site
November 2011. It can clearly be seen
that the density of oysters is greater
within the trap than on its surface. A
method has yet to be developed to
monitor these interior oysters without
destroying the reef itself.
12

Finfish sampling to determine habitat value
Demonstration Reefs — Monitoring of the demonstration reefs to assess finfish habitat use of this
habitat began in June of 2012 using a drop net fish sampling technique developed by College of
Charleston Marine Biology graduate student Ryan Joyce (see Kingsley -Smith et al., 2012). This
technique involved the temporary installation of a net around the crab trap reef at low tide the
day before sampling was to occur. The net is then dropped at high tide the day of sampling
whereafter finfish and invertebrates are sampled using dip nets 2-3 hours prior to low tide with
the help of volunteers until the tide has reached its maximum ebb (Figure 9). Finfish sampling of
these demonstration reefs. augmented with crab traps supported by a State Wildlife grant in the
Spring 2012, occurred between June 2012 and October 2012 (see Table 3 below for specific
dates).
[Kingsley -Smith, P.R., Joyce, R.E., Amon, S.A., Roumillat, RCA., McDonough, C.J. & Reichert,
M.J.M. (2012). Habitat use of intertidal Eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) reefs by nekton
in South Carolina estuaries. Journal ofShelllish Research 31(4):1009-1021.1
Figure 9. Finfish sampling the demonstration reef'at Bear's Bluff. This reef was created on
May 2"d 2011 and an additional 23 revitalized traps were added to the reef on May I5'), 2012.
The ftnTsh sampling event shown here occurred on .August 2"d 2012 x•ith the help gl'rnlunteers.
RECEIVED
DEC 18 7nt4
DCM-MHD CITY
The demonstration reef at Hutchinson Cut was deemed to be unsuitable for this particular
method of sampling due to the high degree of exposure and wave energy at this site, exacerbated
by high levels of boat traffic, especially from large recreational vessels during the summer
months, that adversely affected the ability to secure the net lead line to the sediment surface. As
a result it was not re -sampled after 07/2012012.

ARA.
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Pat McCrory
Governor
March 10, 2015
Mr. Ted Wilgis
NC Coastal Federation
309 W. Salisbury Street
Wrightsville Beach, NC 28480
Subject: EXEMPTION
Stormwater Project No. SW8150118
Stump Sound Oyster Habitat Restoration
Onslow County
Dear Mr. Wilgis:
Natural Resources
Donald van der Vaart
Secretary
The Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources received a copy of the CAMA Major
Permit Application for the subject project on January 14, 2015. Staff review of the plans and specifications has determined that
the development activities proposed at this time will not pose a threat to surface water quality from stormwater runoff. The
Director has determined that projects that are reviewed and approved by the Division as not posing a water quality threat from
stormwater runoff should not be subject to the stormwater management permitting requirements of 15A NCAC 2H.1000, the
stormwater rules. By copy of this letter, we are informing you that this project will not require a stormwater management
permit.
If the subject project disturbs one acre or more and has a point source discharge of stormwater runoff, then it is also subject to
the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater discharge requirements. You are required to have
an NPDES permit for stormwater discharge from projects meeting these criteria. All temporary built -upon area associated with
the construction of the project must be removed within 30 days of completion of the project, or when it is no longer needed,
whichever occurs first,
If you have any questions or need additional information concerning this matter please contact Linda Lewis at [phone],
or e-mail her at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
For Tracy E. Davis, P.E., Director
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
GDS/arl: G:\WQ\Shared\Stormwate6Permits & Projects015 \150118 Exemption\2015 03 permit 150118
cc: Onslow County Planning Department
Shaun Simpson/Jason Dail, WIRO DCM
Jonathan Howell, DCM RECEIVED
Wilmington Regional Office Stormwater File
MAR 19 785
Vc-M ,�DCrro
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
Land Quality Section —Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, North Carolina 28405• [phone] / Fax: [phone]

DCM Coordinator: • C CGI.g Permit #:
Agents:
DCM Field Offices
Elizabeth City
Morehead City
Washington
Wilmington
(with revised work plan drawings)
US ACOE Offices:
Washington: Raleigh Bland
Tracey Wheeler
William Westcott (NC DOT)
Bill Biddlecome (NC DOT)
Wilmington: Tyler Crumbly
Cultural Resources: Renee Gledhill -Early
Public Water Supply: Diane Williams (WIRO) y
Joey White (WARD) ✓
Marine Fisheries: Shane Staples t�
Jessi Baker
NC DOT:
Ken Pace
Shellfish Sanitation:
Patti Fowler
State Property:
Tim Walton
Water Quality:
Karen Higgins (Raleigh)
John Hennessy (NC DOT)
Washington:
Anthony Scarbraugh-401
Scott Vinson-Stormwater
Wilmington:
Joanne Steenhuis — 401
Chad Coburn - 401
Linda Lewis - Stormwater
Wildlife Resources:
Maria Dunn (WARD)
Vacant (WIRO)
LPO:
Fax Distribution:
Permitee #:
Agent #:_

A
OEM
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
February 26, 2015
N.C. Coastal Federation
128 Grenville Street
Manteo, N.C. 27954
Dear Sir or Madam:
The enclosed permit constitutes authorization under the Coastal Area Management Act, and where
applicable, the State Dredge and Fill Law, for you to proceed with your project proposal. The original (buff -
colored form) is retained by you and it must be available on site when the project is inspected for
compliance. Please sign both the original and the copy and return the copy to this office in the enclosed
envelope. Signing the permit and proceeding means you have waived your right of appeal described below.
If you object to the permit or any of the conditions, you may request a hearing pursuant to NCGS
113A-121.1 or 113-229. Your petition for a hearing must be filed in accordance with NCGS Chapter 150B
with the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27611-6714, (919) 733-
2698 within twenty (20) days of this decision on your permit. You should also be aware that another
qualified party may submit an objection to the issuance of this permit within twenty (20) days.
The project plan is subject to those conditions appearing on the permit form. Otherwise, all work
must be carried out in accordance with your application. Modifications, time extensions, and future
maintenance requires additional approval. Please read your permit carefully prior to starting work and review
all project plans, as approved. If you are having the work done by a contractor, it would be to your benefit to
be sure that he fully understands all permit requirements.
From time to time, Department personnel will visit the project site. To facilitate this review, we
request that you complete and mail the enclosed Notice Card just prior to work initiation. However, if
questions arise concerning permit conditions, environmental safeguards, or problem areas, you may contact
Department personnel at any time for assistance. By working in accordance with the permit, you will be
helping to protect our vitally important coastal resources.
Enclosure
Sincerely,
x oP
Douglas V. Huggett
Major Permits and Consistency Manager
400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] k FAX [phone] k Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer

R
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: NC Coastal Federation
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Pamlico Sound, Shallowbag Bay, Broad Creek, anc
Scarborough Creek
Photo Index — 2006:Scarborough Creek 183-7192 (Q, 16); Shallowbag Bay 183-7192
(X,4); Broad Creek 183-7196 (Q,7); Thicket Lump 183-7197 (N,16) 2000:
Scarborough Creek 183-2137 (D,6); Shallowbag Bay 183-2137 (E, 20); Broad Creek
183-2133 (P,18); Thicket Lump- no aerial found
State Plane Coordinates — Scarborough Creek X: 2986818 Y: 802612; Shallowbag
Bay X: 2990950 Y: 800742; Broad Creek X: 3001924 Y: 782225, Thicket Lump X:
3002274 Y: 775539
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: D & F
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit — 12/2/14
Was Applicant Present - no
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received Complete - 12/9/14
Office - Elizabeth City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A)
Local Land Use Plan — Dare County
Land Classification From LUP - yes
(B)
AEC(s) Involved: Estuarine Water/ Public Trust Area
(C)
Water Dependent: yes
(D)
Intended Use: private
(E)
Wastewater Treatment: Existing - none
Planned -none
RECEIVED
(F)
Type of Structures: Existing - none
Planned - oyster reef
DEC 181mb
(G)
Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: n/a
fspw" +�
Source — n/a
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
DREDGED FILLED
OTHER
(A) Estuarine Waters/Public Trust
7,500 sq ft
Area
(B) Total Area Disturbed: 7,500 sq ft
(C) Primary Nursery Area: no
(D) Water Classification: SA
Open: Broad Creek -yes, Scarborough Creek,
Shallowbag Bay, Pamlico Sound- no
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to construct 4 separate oyster reef
structures in different locations around Roanoke Sound. The reef structures will be
constructed of bagged oyster shell and marl and also of reclaimed crab pots covered
in mortar.

Field Investigation Report
Page 2
Project Setting
The proposed project is located in four different locations in or near the Pamlico Sound.
The first site is located in the Pamlico Sound approximately 20 ft offshore from the Thicket
Lump area in Wanchese, Dare County. The project site is adjacent to an undeveloped
coastal wetland area vegetated primarily with Juncus Roemarianus. The adjacent land is
owned by Metropolitan Designs Inc. The water depths in this area are approximately 24-
38". The water is closed to shellfish harvesting in this area. The second proposed site is in
Broad Creek in the village of Wanchese, Dare County. The site is approximately 30 ft
offshore adjacent to land owned by the State of North Carolina that is an undeveloped
coastal wetland area vegetated primarily by Spartina Alterniflora. The water depths are
approximately 28-40". The waters are classified as SA waters in this area. The third site is
located in Scarborough Creek in Manteo, Dare County. The site is approximately 20 ft
offshore adjacent to privately owned land that is also a coastal marsh vegetated primarily
with juncus roemarianus. The water depths are 36-40" and are closed to shellfish
harvesting. The last site is in Shallowbag Bay in Manteo, Dare County. The site is
approximately 20 ft offshore adjacent to a coastal marsh area owned by the State of North
Carolina. Water depths are 36-40" and the waters are closed to shellfish harvesting. No
SAV's were observed in any of the project sites and the project sites all have sandy water
bottom.
Development Proposal
The applicant proposes to construct artificial oyster reefs in the four proposed locations to
restore and promote oyster growth. The reefs would be constructed of nylon mesh bags
filled with approximately a bushel of oyster shells or marl and also with reclaimed crab pots
that have had their vents closed and then covered in a ceramic tile mortar which provides
the substrate for oyster larvae to settle on. The pots will measure 2x2x2 feet and will weigh
approximately 50 pounds. The bags have a final dimension of 2'x6"x8" and weigh 35
pounds. The bags are stacked in a pyramid form to create the desired dimensions of the
reef.
The project proposes to construct an approximatly 200 x 10 ft reef at the Thicket Lump
area. The structure would be approximately 20 ft offshore and constructed of two crab pot
reefs measuring 10 x 40 ft and two shell bag reefs measuring 10 x 40 ft with 10 -20 ft
between each reef section. The second site in Broad Creek would be similarly constructed,
approximately 200 ft long and 10 ft wide and consist of two shell bag reefs and two crab pot
reefs each measuring 10 x 40 ft. The third site in Scarborough Creek would be
approximately 150 ft long consisting of two crab pot reefs measuring 10 x 40 ft and one RECEIVED
oyster shell bag reef measing10 x 40 ft. The fourth site in Shallowbag Bay would be
approximately 200 ft long with two crab pot and two oyster shell bag reef sections with AC 18 �"'
same measurements. DCM-MHD CITY
The applicant will secure the crab pot reefs with 3/8" rebar measuring 2 ft long with a hook
at one end. The rebar will be driven into the ground to secure the pots. The pots will be
placed beside one another in a checkerboard pattern and the pots will be attached to one
another using zip ties or hog rings. The oyster shell bags will be stacked on top of each

Field Investigation Report
Page 3
other in a pyramid form to achieve the desired dimensions. The corners of the proposed
reef structures will be marked with PVC poles and reflective tape and additional markers will
be placed every 50 ft along the reef. The markers will extend a minimum of 3 ft above
NWL.
The applicant proposes to monitor the reefs for at least 3 years after construction on an
annual basis and after any major storms to ensure that they are intact. The applicant will
also be monitoring the success of the reefs looking for oyster colonization and growth.
Anticipated Impacts
The proposed development will result in the filling of 7,500 sq ft of Public Trust Area and
Estuarine Water AECs
Submitted by: Kelly Russell
Date: Dec. 15, 2014
RECEIVED
DEC 18 ?"A
BP_R4-MHn CITY

RECEIVED
DEC ] S 701e
DrM-MHD CIIV

Govoni, Daniel
From: Erin Fleckenstein <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 10:21 AM
To: Govoni, Daniel
Subject: Crab Pots to Oyster Reefs Permit
Hi Daniel,
After careful consideration and conversations among staff and with Shellfish Sanitation, the
federation would like to remove one of the proposed reef sites listed in the CAMA Major Permit titled:
A Novel Use for Abandoned Crab Pots: Upcycling Pots to Create Oyster Reefs in Pamlico Sound.
The site we'd like to remove is the Scarborough Creek Site, internal to Shallowbag Bay.
Thank you and please let me know if you have any questions about this.
We look forward to receiving the final approved permit in the near future.
Best,
Erin
Erin Fleckenstein
Coastal Scientist and Regional Manager
128 Grenville Street
Manteo, NC 27954
[phone] office
[phone] cell
Subscribe to Coastal Review Online
Become a Facebook Fan
Join us at www.nccoast.ora
© Please consider the environment before printing this email.

■ Complete Items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
hem 4 If Restricted Delivery Is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mallplece,
or on the front If space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
%rrd; l«di LA
❑ Agent
B. R?cOilved btPdnted Name)
D. Is delivery address different from Item 1❑
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Service Type
❑ Certified Mail* ❑ Priority Mall Express"
❑ Registered - ❑ Rehm Receipt for Merchandise
` ❑ Insured Mall 13 Collect on Delivery.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) - p Yes
2. Article Number
(irensferh 7013 3020 0000 5538 1930
PS Form 3 u y Domestic Retum Receipt
■ Complete Items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
hem 4 If Restricted Delivery Is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailplec,
or on the front If space permits.
I. Article Addressed to:
P,P+ 1u22
►t�;�ti NL a-7to(7
A. Signature
❑ Agent
❑ ddressee
B' Rec Ived by� � hNe�mr�pe) C. Date of Delive
D. Is delivery address diti rentfrom hem 1? ❑ Yes
j If YES, enter delivery address below: -. ❑ No
�. SaviCe ppe .
�---�
❑ Certified MAIN
©Priority Mall Express'"
v Q Reglstered
Q Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑Insured Mall
❑ Collect on Delivery
-"' 4. Restricted Delivery? (aft F.). . - ...-. ❑ Yes
2. Article Nurr' -
(Transferfn 7013 3020 0000 5538 1947
PS Form 3811, July 2013 Domestic Return Receipt
■ Complete Items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
Item 4 If Restricted Deliv Is desired.
■ Print your name and add ss on the reverse
so that we can return th card to you.
■ Attach this card to the ck of the mailpiece,
space b
or on the front if rmits.
1. Article Addressed to:
0 Agent
❑Addressee
B. 11�ed dntoCu/}�mn(.) g' bate of Delivery RECEIVED
D. Is delNerye9 s dif1wemfromitem t? ❑ Yas DEC 18 1014
if YES, M denvejaddra6 below: ❑ No
DCM-MHD CITY
w
r�
3. Service T ` ";
❑ Qertified Malle"1131IRty Mail Express-
❑ Registered._ ©Return Reoyipt for Merchandise
.. ❑ Insured Mail ❑ Collect on Delivery
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. AM ' " '
(rm 7013 3020 0000 5538 1954
Ps Form 3811, July2013 Domestic Return Receipt

RECEIVED
DEC 18 1014
EoprowHH eITV

MAJOR PERMIT FEE MATRIX
Applicant: NC Coastal Federation;
Abandoned Crab Pots to Oyster Reefs
Development Type
Fee
DCM %
DWQ
(14300 1601 435100093 1625 6253)
(24300 1602 435100095 2341)
. Private, non-commercial
development that does not
$250
100% ($250)
0% ($0)
nvolve the filling or
excavation of any wetlands
or open water areas:
01-
]III.
I. Public or commercial
development that does not;
$400
100% ($400)
0% ($0)
nvolve the filling or
excavation of any wetlands
or open water areas:
Major Modification to a
$250
100% ($250)
0% ($0)
CAMA Major permit
For development thatnvolves
the filling and/or
excavation of up to 1 acre
of wetlands and/or open
water areas, determine if A,
B, C, or D below applies:
Ill(A). Private, non-
commercial development, if
$250
100% ($250)
0% ($0)
General Water Quality
Certification No. 3490 (See
attached can be applied:
III(B). Public or commercial
development, if General
$400
100% ($400)
0% ($0)
Water Quality Certification
No. 3490 (See attached)
can be applied:
III(C). If General Water
❑
Quality Certification No.
$400
60% ($240)
40% ($160) ' ivEO
3490 (see attached) could
be applied, but DCM staff
DEC 18 291
determined that additional
review and written DWQ
0Cn-MHD Ci
concurrence is needed
because of concerns
related to water quality or
aquatic life:
III D . If General Water
Quality Certification No.
$400
60% ($240)
44($,90,
3490 see attached cannot
be applied:
IV. For development that
mwmmm�
involves the filling and/or
$475
60% ($285)
4
excavation of more than
one acre of wetlands and/or
open water areas:
NC COASTAL FEDERATION CHECK #17045 RECEIVED 11i1�/14

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1367 US Hwy 17 South
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
252-264-3901
#17045 dated 03/13/2014
Major Permit Application Fee for Project: A Novel Use for
Abandoned Crab Pots--Upcycling Pots to Create Oyster
Reefs in Pamlico Sound, Dare County
AMOUNT: $ 400.001
Payment received by Yvonne Carver
Payment received from NC Coastal Federation, Inc.
Date payment received 11/25/2014
RECEIVED
DEC 18 2014
DCKA-MIND C"

"'This is a word processing form to be completed in Microsoft Word"'
ti NC Division of Coastal Management
Major Permit Application Computer Sheet
(02115/2010)
� j �, Q
1 s to
Date: 12/152014
Applicant:
Project Site County
CLtF
Staff:
If L&S52I
I
District: lizabeth City Washington
Morehead City ❑Wilmington
Project Name:
PAb
Rover File:
Date application "received as complete' in the Field office (EX: 1/82007): IQ j Q j j y-
SITE DESCRIPTION/PERMIT INFORMATION
PNA: ❑Yes EVJo
Photos Taken: Yes No❑
Setback Require (riparian): Yes o
Critical Habitat: OYes No Not Sure
15 foot waiver obtained: Yes o
Hazard Notification Returned:
❑Yes Wo
SAV: Yes o Not Sure
Shell Bottom: s o YeNot Sure
Temporary Impacts: ❑Yes o
Sandbags: LjYes FNo Not Sure
Did the land us classification come from
county LUP: es ❑No
Mitigation Required (optional):
Oyes 900
Moratorium Conditions ❑Yes Po
❑NA
Environm ntal Assessment Done:
OyesVNo ❑NA
SECONDARY WATER CLASSIFICATION — OPTIONAL (choose MAX of 4)
Future Water Supply (FINS)
Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW)
El Swamp Waters (SW)
❑ High Quality Waters (HQW)
Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW)
WETLANDSIMPACTED
❑ (404) Corp. of Engineers (Jurisdictional
❑ (LS) Sea lavender (Limonium sp.)
(SS) Glasswort ( Salioomia sp.)
wetlands)
(CJ) Saw grass (Cladium jamaicense)
[I (SA) Salt marsh cordgrass (Spartina
(SY) Satt reed grass (Spartina
alterniflora)
cynosuroides)
❑ (DS) Salt or spike grass (Distichlis
❑ (SC) Bullrush or three square (Scirpus
(TY) Cattail (fypha sp.)RECEIVED
spicata)
sp.)
(JR) Black needlerush (Juncus
(SP) Salt/meadow grass (Spartina
roemerianus)
patens)
DCM-MHD IT"
APPLICATION FEE
No fee required - $0.00
❑ III(A) Private w/ D&F up to 1 acre; 3490
III(D) Priv. public or Comm w/ D&F to 1
can be applied - $250
acre; 3490 can't be applied - $400
Minor Modification to a CAMA Major
❑ Major Modification to a CAMA Major
IV Any development involving D&F of
permit - $100
permit - $250
more than 1 acre - $475
❑ Permit Transfer - $100
III(B) Public or commercial wl D&F to 1
Express Permit - $2000
acre; 3490 can be applied - $400
❑ Major development extension request -
ll. Public or commercial/no dredge
$100
and/or fill - $400
❑ I. Private no dredge and/or fill - $250
III(C) Priv. public or comm w /D&F to 1
acre; 3490 can be applied; DCM needs
DWQ agreement - $400
252-808.2808 :: 1.888.4RCOAST :: www.nccoastalmanagement.net revised: 02/15/10

NC Division of Coastal Mgt. Application Computer Sheet, Page 2 of 3)
Applicant:
Date: 12/1W014
I
Describe below the ACTIVITIES that have been applied for. All values should match the dimension order, and units of
measurement found in your Activities code sheet.
TYPE
REPLACE
Activity Name
Number
Choose
Choose
Dimension 1
Dimension 2
Dimension 3
Dimension 4
One
One
New Work EF
Replace
I �+J
Maint ❑
❑ Y
New Work Lj
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work 0
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work 0
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New WoiW=
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work 0
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work 0
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work 0
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work 0
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work 0
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New WoFK=
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work Lj
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Wofi=
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work 0
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
R
New Work
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
DEC 1 A 7m
New Work 0
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ NM'MHH
C
revised 02/1 5/10

INC Division of Coastal Mgt. Application Computer Sheet, Page 3 of 3)
Applicant:
+ Date:12/152014
Describe below the HABITAT disturbances for the application. All values should match the name, and units of measurement
found in your Habitat code sheet.
Habitat Name
DISTURB TYPE
Choose One
TOTAL Sq. FL
(Applied for.
Disturbance total
includes any
anticipated
restoration or
temp impacts)
FINAL Sq. Ft.
(Anticipated final
disturbance.
Excludes any
restoration
and/or temp
impact amount)
TOTAL Feet
(Applied for.
Disturbance
total includes
any anticipated
restoration or
temp impacts)
FINAL Feet
(Anticipated final
disturbance.
Excludes any
restoration and/or
temp impact
amount
SW664mmdge
❑ Fill Both ❑ Other ❑
1
u
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
RECEIVED
nFr 18 2014
DCM-MHD CITY
252-808.2808 :: 1.888.4RCOAST :: www_nccoastalmaaagement.net revised: 02/15N0

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
APPLICATION TRANSMITTAL AND PROCESSING RECORD
A) APPLICANT: NC Coastal Federation County: Dare
LOCATION OF PROJECT: offshore in the Pamlico Sound near Thicket Lump, Wanchese; in Broad Creek near the
Village of Wanchese; in Scarborough Creek, Manteo; and in Shallowbag Bay in Manteo
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED COMPLETE BY FIELD REP: 12/09/14
FIELD RECOMMENDATION: Attached: NO To Be Forwarded: YES
CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION: Attached: NO To Be Forwarded: YES
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE: Kelly Russell DISTRICT OFFICE: Elizabeto City
DISTRICT MANAGER REVIEW: Date:/2 /.1- /
B) DATE RECEIVED BY MAJOR PERMITS UNIT: FEE REC'D: $ 400 (100%)
PUBLIC NOTICE REC'D: Advertise: 12/18/14 END OF NOTICE DATE: Comments due: 01/07/15
ADJ. RIP. PROP NOTICES REC'D: DEED REC'D:
APPLICATION ASSIGNED TO: 7D� ON:
C) 75 DAY DEADLINE: 02/22/15
MAIL OUT DATE: Circulation: I E// y
FEDERAL DUE DATE:
150 DAY DEADLINE:
STATE DUE DATE: Comments due: 0/45 //S
FED COMMENTS REC'D:
PERMIT FINAL ACTION: ISSUE DENY
DRAFT ON
AGENCY
DATE
COMMENTS
RETURNED
OBJECTIONS:
YES NO
NOTES
Coastal Management - Regional Representative
(—1 Z
Coastal Management - LUP Consistency
Division of Community Assistance
Land Quality Section
Division of Water Quality
Storm Water Management (DWQ)
State Property Office
—
Division of Archives & History
Division of Environmental Health
Division of Highways
Wildlife Resources Commission
—7L
Local Permit Office
Division of Marine Fisheries
Corps of Engineers
t�
uti
DCa+-MHr: f ,

RECEIVED
DEC 18 7n'"
DCM-MHD CITY

XFWA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 29, 2015
MEMORANDOM
TO:
Daniel Govoni, NC DENR
Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
From:
Shannon Jenkins,
Environmental Program Supervisor
Shellfish Sanitation and Recreational Water Quality
Through:
Patti Fowler,
Section Chief
Shellfish Sanitation and Recreational Water Quality
SUBJECT:
CAMA / Dredge & Fill Permit Application Review
Applicant: NC Coastal Federation
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Proposed Project: Install 4 separate oyster reef structures, constructed of bagged oyster
shell, marl and reclaimed crab pots covered in mortar
The proposed project includes the construction of four separate oyster reef structures. While it
is acknowledged that oyster reefs have potential beneficial impacts (habitat, water quality, etc),
three of the reefs would be located in waters classified as Prohibited and closed to the harvest
of shellfish due to water quality that can cause illness if consumed. The location of the three
"closed" oyster reefs are a public health concern as they would be accessible under certain
conditions W11116 jal harvesting, either purposefully by poachers or by tourists, etc. who may be
unaware of the areas being closed and the health risks they may pose. These locations may
also result in additional patrols by DMF Marine Patrol for enforcement purposes.
The Scarborough Creek location creates a special concern in that it is located relatively near to
the Manteo Wastewater Treatment Plant outfall, especially since this plant has historically had
performance issues. After talking with the applicant, they have agreed to not use this location. It
is requested that this location be deleted when the permit is issued.
It is also requested that as a condition of the permit, the other two "closed" oyster reefs (outer
Shallowbag Bay, Thicket Lump) be # quired to post signs indicating these as research projects
and that the area is closed to shellfish harvest.
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Oppodunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer - Made in part by recycled paper

���
CCDEE R
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory RECEIVED
Governor
DEC 18 2014
December 15, 2014 [)CM -Fisheries
WARO
101 OIT/ 0);L•\`►11111uT1
TO: Shane Staples, Fisheries Resource Specialist
Division of Coastal Management, WaRO
FROM: Daniel Govoni
Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
Applicant: NC Coastal Federation
John E. Skvada, III
Secretary
Project Location: offshore in the Pamlico Sound near Thicket Lump, Wanchese; in Broad
Creek near the Village of Wanchese; in Scarborough Creek, Manteo; and
in Shallowbag Bay in Manteo, Dare County
Proposed Project: install 4 separate oyster reef structures, constructed of bagged oyster shell,
marl & reclaimed crab pots covered in mortar.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this
form by 01/05/15 to 400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, NC 28557 (fax: [phone]).
If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Kelly Russell at (252)
264-3901. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data are requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
7X This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
SIGNED 4W/ DATE I Z f
1367 US 17 South, Elizabeth Clty, NC 27909
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] ; Internet: www.ncDoastaimanagement.net
An Equal opportunity 1 Aflirmative Action Employer

February 18, 2015
Regulatory Division
Action ID No. SAW-2015-00139
Mr. Doug Huggett
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557-3421
Dear Mr. Huggett:
Reference the application of The NC Coastal Federation c/o Erin Fleckenstein to construct
4 separate oyster reefs structures, constructed of bagged oyster shell, marl and reclaimed crab
pots covered in mortar in Thicket Lump, Broad Creek, Scarborough Creek, and Shallowbay Bay,
in the Roanoke Sound, Dare County, North Carolina.
The Federal agencies have completed review of the proposal as presented by the
application and your field investigation report.
We recommend that the following conditions be included in the State authorization:
1. All work authorized by this permit must be performed in strict compliance with the
attached plans, which are a part of this permit. Any modification to these plans must be approved
by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) prior to implementation.
2. The permittee understands and agrees that, if future operations by the United States
require the removal, relocation, or other alteration, of the structure or work herein authorized, or
if, in the opinion of the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative, said structure or
work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of the navigable waters, the
permittee will be required, upon due notice from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, to remove,
relocate, or alter the structural work or obstructions caused thereby, without expense to the
United States. No claim shall be made against the United States on account of any such removal,
relocation, or alteration. The permittee shall notify NOAA/NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE
Chief Source Data Unit N CS261, 1315 E West HWY- RM 7316, Silver Spring, MD 20910-
3282 at least two weeks prior to beginning work and upon completion of work.

3. Except as specified in the plans attached to this permit, no excavation, fill or mechanized
land -clearing activities shall take place at any time in the construction or maintenance of this
project, in such a manner as to impair normal flows and circulation patterns within waters or
wetlands or to reduce the reach of waters or wetlands.
4. Except as authorized by this permit or any USACE approved modification to this
permit, no excavation, fill or mechanized land -clearing activities shall take place at any time in
the construction or maintenance of this project, within waters or wetlands. This permit does not
authorize temporary placement or double handling of excavated or fill material within waters or
wetlands outside the permitted area. This prohibition applies to all borrow and fill activities
connected with this project.
5. Unless otherwise authorized by this permit, all fill material placed in waters or wetlands
shall be generated from an upland source and will be clean and free of any pollutants except in
trace quantities. Metal products, organic materials (including debris from land clearing
activities), or unsightly debris will not be used.
6. The authorized structure and associated activity must not interfere with the public's right
to free navigation on all navigable waters of the United States. No attempt will be made by the
permittee to prevent the full and free use by the public of all navigable waters at or adjacent to
the authorized work for reason other than safety.
7. The permittee shall advise the Corps in writing at least two weeks prior to beginning the
work authorized by this permit and again upon completion of the work authorized by this permit.
8. The permittee shall require its contractors and/or agents to comply with the terms and
conditions of this permit in the construction and maintenance of this project, and shall provide
each of its contractors and/or agents associated with the construction or maintenance of this
project with a copy of this permit. A copy of this permit, including all conditions, shall be
available at the project site during construction and maintenance of this project.
9. The permittee shall employ all sedimentation and erosion control measures necessary to
prevent an increase in sedimentation or turbidity within waters and wetlands outside the permit
area. This shall include, but is not limited to, the immediate installation of silt fencing or similar
appropriate devices around all areas subject to soil disturbance or the movement of earthen fill,
and the immediate stabilization of all disturbed areas. Additionally, the project must remain in
full compliance with all aspects of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 (North
Carolina General Statutes Chapter 113A Article 4).
10. The activity will be conducted in such a manner as to prevent a significant increase in
turbidity outside the area of construction or construction -related discharge. Increases such that
the turbidity in the waterbody is 50 NTU's or less in all rivers not designated as trout waters by
the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (NCDEM), 25 NTU's or less in all
saltwater classes and in all lakes and reservoirs, and 10 NTU's or less in trout waters, are not

considered significant.
11. Violations of these conditions or violations of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act or
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act must be reported in writing to the Wilmington District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers within 24 hours of the permittee's discovery of the violation.
Questions or comments may be addressed to Mr. Josh Pelletier, Washington Field Office,
Regulatory Division, telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
Josh Pelletier
Regulatory Project Manager
Copies Furnished:
Mr. Ian McMillan
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Mr. Pete Benjamin
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. Fritz Rhode
National Marine Fisheries Service
Habitat Conservation Service
101 Pivers Island Road
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
Mr. Jeffrey Garnett
Wetlands and Marine Regulatory Section
Water Protection Division -Region IV
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
61 Forsyth Street, SW
Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Frank Jennings, District Manager
Elizabeth City Field Office
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
December 15, 2014
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Richard Peed, Erosion & Sedimentation Control
Division of Energy, Minerals & Land Resources, WaRO
FROM: Daniel Govoni
Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
Applicant: NC Coastal Federation
John E. Skvada, III
Secretary
Project Location: offshore in the Pamlico Sound near Thicket Lump, Wanchese; in Broad
Creek near the Village of Wanchese; in Scarborough Creek, Manteo; and
in Shallowbag Bay in Manteo, Dare County
Proposed Project: install 4 separate oyster reef structures, constructed of bagged oyster shell,
marl & reclaimed crab pots covered in mortar.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this
form by 01/05/15 to 400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, NC 28557 (fax: [phone]).
If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Kelly Russell at (252)
264-3901. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data are requested.
nrr9VED
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed. FEB 0 4 2015
r+py,l_pnRc1 F.RW
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
SIGNED d`fDATE 47,4LI.
1367 US 17 South, Elizabeth City, NC 27909
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] ; Internet: www.nocoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Division of Coastal Management
Pat McCrory
Governor
MEMORANDUM
Natural Resources
TO: Daniel Govoni, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
THROUGH: Frank A. Jennings, III, District Manager
FROM: Kelly Russell, Field Representative
DATE: January 9, 2015
SUBJECT: NC Coastal Federation Major Permit Recommendations
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
The applicant proposes to construct 4 separate oyster reef structures in different locations around
Roanoke Sound. The sites of the proposed development are within the Pamlico Sound,
Shallowbag Bay, Broad Creek, and Scarborough Creek, in Dare County.
The development proposal involves the Public Trust Area (PTA), Estuarine Waters (EW) Areas
of Environmental Concern (AEC).
I have reviewed the Rules of the Coastal Resources Commission (CRC) as they pertain to this
project and my findings are as follows:
07H.0206 Estuarine Waters
(c) Management Objective. To conserve and manage the important features of estuarine waters
so as to safeguard and perpetuate their biological, social, aesthetic, and economic values; to
coordinate and establish a management system capable of conserving and utilizing estuarine
waters so as to maximize their benefits to man and the estuarine and ocean system.
(d) Use Standards. Suitable land/water uses shall be those consistent with the management
objectives in this Rule. Highest priority of use shall be allocated to the conservation of estuarine
waters and their vital components. Second priority of estuarine waters use shall be given to
those types of development activities that require water access and use which cannot function
elsewhere such as simple access channels; structures to prevent erosion; navigation channels;
boat docks, marinas, piers, wharfs, and mooring pilings. In every instance, the particular
location, use, and design characteristics shall be in accord with the general use standards for
coastal wetlands, estuarine waters, and public trust areas described in Rule 07H.0208. RECEIVED
JAN 11 201;
DC.M-WD CITY

NC Coastal Federation Major Permit Recommendations
Jan. 9, 2015
Page 2
Consistent: The applicant proposes to construct oyster reefs that will enhance the
biological and economic value of the waterbodies.
07H.0207 Public Trust Areas
(c) Management Objective. To protect public rights for navigation and recreation and to
conserve and manage the public trust areas so as to safeguard and perpetuate their biological,
economic and aesthetic value.
(d) Use Standards. Acceptable uses shall be those consistent with the management objectives in
Paragraph (c) of this Rule. In the absence of overriding public benefit, any use which
jeopardizes the capability of the waters to be used by the public for navigation or other public
trust rights which the public may be found to have in these areas shall not be allowed. The
development of navigational channels or drainage ditches, the use of bulkheads to prevent
erosion, and the building of piers, wharfs, or marinas are examples of uses that may be
acceptable within public trust areas, provided that such uses shall not be detrimental to the public
trust rights and the biological and physical functions of the estuary. Projects which would
directly or indirectly block or impair existing navigation channels, increase shoreline erosion,
deposit spoils below normal high water, cause adverse water circulation patterns, violate water
quality standards, or cause degradation of shellfish waters are considered incompatible with the
management policies of public trust areas. In every instance, the particular location, use, and
design characteristics shall be in accord with the general use standards for coastal wetlands,
estuarine waters, and public trust areas.
Consistent: The development proposal is consistent with the intent of this rule. RECEIVFp
1AN 1;§
15A NCAC 07H .0208 USE STANDARDS
(a) General Use Standards
(1) Uses which are not water dependent shall not be permitted in coastal wetlands, estuarine
waters, and public trust areas. Restaurants, residences, apartments, motels, hotels, trailer parks,
private roads, factories, and parking lots are examples of uses that are not water dependent. Uses
that are water dependent include: utility crossings, wind energy facilities, docks, wharves, boat
ramps, dredging, bridges and bridge approaches, revetments, bulkheads, culverts, groins,
navigational aids, mooring pilings, navigational channels, access channels and drainage ditches;
(2) Before being granted a permit, the CRC or local permitting authority shall find that the
applicant has complied with the following standards:
(A) The location, design, and need for development, as well as the construction activities
involved shall be consistent with the management objective of the Estuarine and Ocean System
AEC (Rule .0203 of this subchapter) and shall be sited and designed to avoid significant adverse
impacts upon the productivity and biologic integrity of coastal wetlands, shellfish beds,
submerged aquatic vegetation as defined by the Marine Fisheries Commission, and spawning
and nursery areas;
(B) Development shall comply with state and federal water and air quality
(C) Development shall not cause irreversible damage to documented archaeological or historic
resources as identified by the N.C. Department of Cultural resources;
(D) Development shall not increase siltation;
(E) Development shall not create stagnant water bodies;
(F) Development shall be timed to avoid significant adverse impacts on life cycles of estuarine

NC Coastal Federation Major Permit Recommendations
Jan. 9, 2015
Page 3
and ocean resources; and
(G) Development shall not jeopardize the use of the waters for navigation or for other public
trust rights in public trust areas including estuarine waters.
Consistent: The proposed development is proposed in areas with water depths no deeper
than 3 ft and has been designed and sited in areas to minimize any impacts to navigation.
The structures will be visibly marked with PVC poles and reflective tape and will extend a
minimum of 3 ft above normal water level.
Based on my review of the applicable subsections of the North Carolina Administrative Code,
the permit application, and plans, I recommend a Major Permit be issued to NC Coastal
Federation with the standard permit conditions associated with oyster reef structures.
RECEIVED
JAN 12 P°'�
B6M-MHD CM

01/12/2015 08:51 2523314739 NCDOT PAGE 02/02
,w `I A
%NWENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
December 15, 2014
MEMOR.A.NDUM
TO:
Ftzlfadl
SUBJECT:
Applicant:
Ken Pace, PE; Environmental Operations & Rest Area
Department of Transportation.
Daniel Govoni
Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
NC Coastal Federation
John E. Skvada, III
Secretary
oECEIVEO
iAN 0 6 �";a
DISTRICT OFFICE
Project Location: offshore in the Pamlico Sound near Thicket lump, Wanchese; in Broad
Creek near the Village of Wanchese; in Scarborough Creek, Manteo; and
in Shallowbag Bay in Manteo, Dare County
Proposed Project: install 4 separate oyster reef structures, constructed of bagged oyster shell,
marl & reclaimed crab pots covered in mortar.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on. the proposed project and return this
form. by 01/05/15 to 400 Commerce Avenue Morehead City, NC 28557 (fax: [phone].
If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Kelly Russcll at (252)
264-3901. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data are requested.
REPLY: >4—M.s office has no objection to the project as proposed.
This office has no comment on the proposed project.
This office approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This office objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
DATE _/ � o iS
17 South, Elizabeth C'dy, NC 2790
Phone; 252.264-39011 FAX; 252.264-3723 ; Internet: www,nccoastalmanagement,net
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Aollon Employer

���
r
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Govemor
December 15, 2014
Mel
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Applicant:
Tim Walton, Manager
State Property Office
Daniel Govoni
Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
RECEIVED
DEC 17 2014
DOA
STATE PROPERTY
OFFICE
CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
NC Coastal Federation
Project Location: offshore in the Pamlico Sound near Thicket Lump, Wanchese; in Broad
Creek near the Village of Wanchese; in Scarborough Creek, Manteo; and
in Shallowbag Bay in Manteo, Dare County
Proposed Project: install 4 separate oyster reef structures, constructed of bagged oyster shell,
marl & reclaimed crab pots covered in mortar.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this
form by 01/05/15 to 400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, NC 28557 (fax: [phone]).
If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Kelly Russell at (252)
264-3901. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data are requested.
RECEIVED
REPLY: Thl*s office has no objection to the project as proposed.
C 4A / JAN 0 8 2015
� k �a V This office has no comment on the proposed project.
(�
OAW �u -3`r This office approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
M �L„kj�� incorporated. See attached.
Iq c This office objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
SIGNED W DATE
1367 US 1 So ,Elizabeth City, NC 27909
Ph ne: 25 r�4 39011 FAX: 2 -2 723 ; Internet: www,necoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

RECENED
1AN U 9
DCM-MHD CIlY

NIVAJ
Ar
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
December 23, 2014
MEMORANDUM:
To: Daniel Govoni
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
Coastal Management Division
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
From: Dyk Luben, P.E., Regional Engineer, PWSS/WaRO
Subject: CAMA/ Dredge and Fill Permit Application Review
Applicant: NC Coastal Federation
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
Project Location: Offshore in the Pamlico Sound near Thicket Lump, Wanchese; in Broad Creek
near the Village of Wanchese; in Scarborough Creek, Manteo; and in Shallowbag
Bay in Manteo, Dare County
Proposed Project: Install 4 separate oyster reef structures, constructed of bagged oyster shell, marl
& reclaimed crab pots covered in mortar.
REPLY: This office has no objection to the project as proposed.
X This office has no comment on the proposed project.
This office approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This office objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
SIGNED
i
Public Water Supply Section
Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889
Phone: [phone] FAX: 252-94HO401Internet: www.ncwater.org/pws/
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
RECEIVED
DEC 30 2M
DCM,M149 CRY
DATE i2�3 A 0/y

e�� r
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor e I y 121 03
December 15, 2014
SI1Z(11t74 a110M
TO: Maria Tripp Dunn
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
FROM: Daniel Govoni
Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
Applicant: NC Coastal Federation
John E. Skvada, III
Secretary
Project Location: offshore in the Pamlico Sound near Thicket Lump, Wanchese; in Broad
Creek near the Village of Wanchese; in Scarborough Creek, Manteo; and
in Shallowbag Bay in Manteo, Dare County
Proposed Project: install 4 separate oyster reef structures, constructed of bagged oyster shell,
marl & reclaimed crab pots covered in mortar.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this
form by 01/05/15 to 400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, NC 28557 (fax: [phone]).
If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Kelly Russell at (252)
264-3901. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data are requested.
REPLY: This office has no objection to the project as proposed.
This office has no comment on the proposed project.
This office approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This office objects to the project for reasons described in the attached ECEIVED
comments.
JAN 0 2 2015
SIGNED DATE !Z-2Z- 2a.) DCM-MHD CITY
1367 US 17 South, Elizabeth City, NC 27909
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] ; Internet: www.nocoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer

A��r
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
December 15, 2014
MEMORANDUM
TO:
I,' IVA
SUBJECT:
Applicant:
Project Location:
Proposed Project:
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
Lee Padrick
Division of Community Assistance
Daniel Govoni
Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
NC Coastal Federation
offshore in the Pamlico Sound near Thicket Lump, Wanchese; in Broad
Creek near the Village of Wanchese; in Scarborough Creek, Manteo; and
in Shallowbag Bay in Manteo, Dare County
install 4 separate oyster reef structures, constructed of bagged oyster shell,
marl & reclaimed crab pots covered in mortar.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this
form by 01/05/15 to 400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, NC 28557 (fax: [phone]).
If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Kelly Russell at (252)
264-3901. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data are requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
SIGNED DATE RECEIVED
1367 US 17 South, Elizabeth City, INC 27909 DEC 2 2.2014
Phone: 252-2W9011 FAX: [phone]; Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
DCM-MHD CITY
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

LWWO
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
December 15, 2014
if CI]
FROM:
Applicant:
Charlan Owens, District Planner
Division of Coastal Management
Daniel Govoni
Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
NC Coastal Federation
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
Project Location: offshore in the Pamlico Sound near Thicket Lump, Wanchese; in Broad
Creek near the Village of Wanchese; in Scarborough Creek, Manteo; and
in Shallowbag Bay in Manteo, Dare County
Proposed Project: install 4 separate oyster reef structures, constructed of bagged oyster shell,
marl & reclaimed crab pots covered in mortar.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this
form by 01/05/15 to 400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, NC 28557 (fax: [phone]).
If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Kelly Russell at (252)
264-3901. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data are requested.
REPLY: This office has no objection to the project as proposed.
This office has no comment on the proposed project.
This office approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This office objects the pr 'ect for reasons described in the attached
comments.
XSC�—e► +►
RECEIVED
SIGN DATE la, IC-4 IIEC 2 2 2014
1367 US 17 South, Elizabeth City, NC 27909 DCM-MHD Cnv
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] ; Internet: www.nocoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

AVA-b
REDEEM
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
MEMORANDUM
TO: Daniel Govoni, DCM Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
Division of CoXI
Management
FROM: Charlan OwenCP, District Planner
Division of Coastal Management
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
SUBJECT: Major Permit Request by the NC Coastal Federation to install four (4) crab pot and
oyster shell bag reef systems to include: a 200 foot by 10 foot reef system
consisting of two (2) 10 foot by 40 foot crab pot reefs and two (2) 10 foot by 40 foot
oyster shell bag reefs in the Pamlico Sound, Broad Creek and Shallowbag Bay
and a 150 foot by 10 foot reef system consisting of two (2) 10 foot by 40 foot crab
pot reefs and a 10 foot by 40 foot oyster shell bag reef in Scarborough Creek; on
the east side of Roanoke Island, 20 to 30 feet offshore, in Dare County.
DATE: December 16, 2014
Consistency Determination: The request is consistent with/not in conflict with the Dare
County 2009 Land Use Plan certified by the CRC on February
24, 2011.
Overview: The project area consists of four (4) sites located on the east side of Roanoke
Island. The Pamlico Sound site is 20 feet offshore from the Thicket Lump area in Wanchese
with water depths of approximately 24 to 38 inches. The Broad Creek site is 30 feet offshore
with water depths of approximately 28 to 40 inches. The Scarborough Creek site is 20 feet
offshore with water depths of approximately 36 to 40 inches. The Shallowbag Bay site is 20 feet
offshore with water depths of approximately 36 to 40 inches. Each site has a sandy water
bottom and is adjacent to undeveloped coastal wetland/marsh. The Broad Creek site is open to
shellfish harvesting; the remainder are closed. No Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) were
observed at the project sites.
Installation of four (4) crab pot and oyster shell reef systems to include: a 200 foot by 10 foot
reef system consisting of two (2) 10 foot by 40 foot crab pot reefs and two (2) 10 foot by 40 foot
oyster shell bag reefs spaced 10-20 feet apart to be located in the Pamlico Sound, Broad Creek
and Shallowbag Bay; and a 150 foot by 10 foot reef system consisting of two (2) 10 foot by 40
foot crab pat reefs and a 10 foot by 40 foot oyster shell bag reef spaced 10-20 feet apart in
Scarborough Creek are proposed. Reef sections within each reef system will be placed 10 to
20 feet apart.
RECEIVED
1367 US 17 South, Elizabeth City, NC 27909 DEC. 2 2 1014
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] . Internet: www.nocoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity 1 Afirmatve Acton Employer- Made in pad by recycled paper DCM-M HD CITY

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
MEMORANDUM
Page 2 of 4
Reefs will be constructed of reclaimed crab pots covered in ceramic tile mortar and nylon mesh
bags filled with oyster shells or marl. Reclaimed crab pots are 2 foot cubes that weigh
approximately 50 pounds. The pots will be secured to the bottom with a 2 foot length of 3/8 inch
rebar. Pots will be placed in a "checkerboard" pattern and attached to each other with zip ties or
hog rings. Oyster shell bags are 2 foot by 6 inches by 8 inches and weigh 35 pounds. The
bags will be stacked on top of each other in a "pyramid" form to create the reef dimensions.
Reef corners will be marked with PVC poles and reflective tape. Additional markers will be
placed every 50 feet along the reef. All markers will extend a minimum of 3 feet above Normal
Water Level (NWL). Reefs will be monitored for at least 3 years after construction on an annual
basis and after major storm events to ensure they are intact.
A review of potential historic/archaeological resources was not provided.
Reef sites are located outside of navigational channels and will not conflict with known fishing
activities or other recreational users.
Anticipated impacts resulting from this project are expected to include: the filling of 7,500 sq. ft.
of Public Trust Area/Estuarine Waters Areas of Environmental Concern (AEC).
The artificial reefs are meant to restore and promote oyster growth. Oyster reefs provide critical
habitat for fish species and oysters improve water quality by filtering out sediment and nutrients.
Basis for Determination:
The Dare County Land Classification Map identifies all CAMA Areas of Environmental Concern
(AECs) "Conservation" as indicated on Page 217.
As indicated on Page 217 for the "Conservation" designation, "...development should be limited
to residential development and traditional accessory uses permitted in the CAMA AECs such as
but not limited to piers, docks, and crab -shedders."
A glossary of key words is provided on Page 140. Defined terms include:
2. advocate: to promote or encourage
8. may: provides the option, but not required; permissive
17. shall: mandatory, not optional; a more formal term for "will'
18. should: preferred or recommended but not mandatory in all cases
20. support: to foster; may imply financial support
RECEIVED
DEC 2 2 204
DCM-MHD,QTY
1367 US 17 South, Elizabeth City, NC 27909
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] ; Internet: www.nccoastaimanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer- Male in part by recycled paper

North Caroling Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
MEMORANDUM
Page 3 of 4
The following LUP policies may be applicable to this request:
Public Access:
Policy PA #1, Page 142.
"Dare County supports the preservation and protection of the public's
right to access and use of the public trust areas and waters."
Land Use Compatibility:
Archaeological/Historic Resources
Policy LUC #15, Page 159.
"The Dare County Board of Commissioners supports the protection of
structures, lands, and artifacts that have been identified by the NC
Department of Cultural Resources, Division of Archives and History, as
archaeologically or historically significant. On a case -by -case basis
individual protection/management strategies should be implemented to
ensure archaeological and/or historical resources are not destroyed."
Natural Hazards:
Estuarine Systems
Policy NH #2, Page 180.
"Estuarine shoreline development should continue to be managed to
protect and preserve the natural resources of the estuarine waters and
the estuarine shoreline. The appropriate tools for this are the existing
CAMA permit program and the Areas of Environmental Concerns (AECs)
designated under the CAMA program..."
Implementation Strategy, Page 180.
1. Rely on existing CAMA AEC regulations to address
development activities along the ocean beaches, estuarine
shoreline, and other public trust areas in unincorporated Dare
County..."
1367 US 17 South, Elizabeth City, NC 27909
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] ; Internet: www.nocoastaimanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer- Made in part by recycled paper
RECEIVED
DEC 2 2.2014
DCM-MHD CITY

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources MEMORANDUM
Division of Coastal Management Page 4 of 4
Water Quality:
Stormwater
Policy WQ #4, Page 190.
"Efforts to preserve, protect and improve water quality should be
managed at the local level. Local level management allows for a
regulatory approach designed to specifically address unique local needs
and conditions. Existing State stormwater rules should serve as the basis
for local programs with adjustments made to address local needs,
conditions, and community support"
Policy WQ #5, Page 190.
"Efforts to manage stormwater runoff should be based on local conditions
and natural features..."
Fisheries Resources
Policy WQ #11, Page 193.
"Dare County recognizes the importance of our surrounding waters that
serve as habitats for the area's abundant fisheries resources. The
continued productivity of Dare County's fisheries shall be fostered through
restoration and protection of the unique ecosystems upon which they
depend..."
RECEIVED
DEC 2 2.2014
DCM-MHD CITY
1367 US 17 South, Elizabeth City, NC 27909
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] ; Internet: www.nccoastaimanagement.net
An Equal Opportuniy 1 Affirmalhe Acton Employer - Made in part by recycled paper

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Secretary
December 15, 2014
Ms. Erin Fleckenstein
NC Coastal Federation
128 Grenville Street
Manteo, NC 27954
Dear Ms. Fleckenstein:
The NC Division of Coastal Management hereby acknowledges receipt of your
application for State approval for the project proposed in the public trust waters of the
Pamlico Sound, Shallowbag Bay, Broad Creek and Scarborough Creek. It was
received complete on December 9, 2014, and appears to be adequate for processing at
this time. The projected deadline for making a decision is February 22, 2015. An
additional 75-day review period is provided by law when such time is necessary to
complete the review. If you have not been notified of a final action by the initial deadline
stated above, you should consider the review period extended. Under those
circumstances, this letter will serve as your notice of an extended review. However, an
additional letter will be provided on or about the 75th day.
If this agency does not render a permit decision within 70 days from December 9, 2014,
you may request a meeting with the Director of the Division of Coastal Management and
permit staff to discuss the status of your project. Such a meeting will be held within five
working days from the receipt of your written request and shall include the property
owner, developer, and project designer/consultant.
NCGS 113A-119(b) requires that Notice of an application be posted at the location of
the proposed development. Enclosed you will find a "Notice of Permit Filing" postcard
which must be posted at the property of your proposed development. You should post
this notice at a conspicuous point along your property where it can be observed from a
public road. Some examples would be: Nailing the notice card to a telephone pole or
tree along the road right-of-way fronting your property, or at a point along the road right-
of-way where a private road would lead one into your property. Failure to post this
notice could result in an incomplete application.
RECF'
DFF
ocr;
1367 US 17 South, Elizabeth City, NC 27909
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] ; Internet: httc:l/portal.ncdenr orolweb/cm/dcm-home
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

Ms. Erin Fleckenstein
NC Coastal Federation
December 15, 2014
Page 2
An onsite inspection will be made, and if additional information is required, you will be
contacted by the appropriate State or Federal agency. Please contact Kelly Russell,
Field Representative, if you have any questions and/or if you wish to receive a copy of
her field report.
Sincerely,
Frank JEfnnings
District Manager, Northeastern District
NC Division of Coastal Management
FJ/yc
Enclosure
cc: Daniel Govoni, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator, DCM, Morehead City, NC
Kelly Russell, Field Representative, DCM, Elizabeth City, NC
RECEIVED
DEC 18 7n"
PlItO NAup 171ry

E
AMA PERMIT
APPLIED FOR
PROJECT: construct artificial oyster reef
structures made of bagged oyster shell, marl &
reclaimed crab pots & place offshore.
COMMENTS ACCEPTED THROUGH
01107115
APPLICANT: FOR MORE DETAILS CONTACT
THE LOCAL PERMIT OFFICER BELOW:
Erin Fleckenstein & Todd Miller �1 Kelly Russell
NC Coastal Federation
Division of Coastal Management
128 Grenville Street 1367 US Hwy 17 South
Manteo, NC 27954 Elizabeth City, NC 27909
252-473-1607 252-264-3901, Ext. 233

F
RECEIVED
DEC 18 2m
DCMGMMPPY lofty'

w
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
EMAIL MEMORANDUM
TO: Susan Simpson
The Coastland Times
Manteo, NC 27954
[e-mail]
FROM: Yvonne Carver, Administrative Assistant
Division of Coastal Management
DATE: 12/15/14
SUBJECT: Public Notice: NC Coastal Federation
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
Please publish the attached Notice in the Thursday, 12/18/14 issue of The Coastland
Times.
The State Office of Budget and Management requires an original Affidavit of Publication
prior to payment for newspaper advertising. Please send the affidavit, an original
copy of the published notice, and an original invoice to Melissa Sebastian, NC
Division of Coastal Management, 400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, NC
28557, (Telephone [phone]).
Thank you for your assistance in this matter. If you should have any questions, please
contact me at our Elizabeth City office [phone].
Attachment
cc: Daniel Govoni, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator, DCM, Morehead City
Michele Walker, PIO, DCM, Raleigh
Melissa Sebastian, Accounts Payable, DCM, Morehead City
File RECEwr
DEr 1
1367 US 17 South, Elizabeth City, NC 27909 DCIV
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone]', Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer

NOTICE OF FILING OF
APPLICATION FOR CAMA MAJOR
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
NCDENR hereby gives public notice as required by NCGS 113A-119(b) that
application for a development permit in an AEC as designated under the CAMA was
received on 12/09/14. The NC Coastal Federation proposes to install 4 separate oyster
reef structures... constructed of bagged oyster shell, marl & reclaimed crab pots ... to be
located offshore in the Pamlico Sound near Thicket Lump, Wanchese; in Broad Creek
near the Village of Wanchese; in Scarborough Creek, Manteo; and in Shallowbag Bay
in Manteo, Dare County.
A copy of the entire application may be reviewed at the office of the Division of
Coastal Management, located at 1367 US 17 South, Elizabeth City, NC, 252-264-3901
during normal business hours. Comments mailed to Braxton Davis, Director, DCM, 400
Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, NC 28557, prior to 01/07/15, will be considered in
making the permit decision. Later comments will be considered up to the time of permit
decision. Project modification may occur based on review & comment by the public,
state & federal agencies. Notice of the permit decision in this matter will be provided
upon written request.
PLEASE PUBLISH ON: Thursday, 12/18/14
RECEIVED
DEC 18 2014
F*F!Nm-"WF) I-Mv