Wilder, Jimmie (2)

TOWN OF SURF CITY
P. O. BOX 2475 214 N. NEW RIVER DRIVE SURF CITY, NC 28445
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
hnp://suifcity.govofice.com
A D. (Zander) Guy, Jr:, Mayor
Nelva R. Albury, Mayor Pro -tern
Michael H. Curley, Council Member
Date: 05-27-05
Applicant Name:
Address:
City:
Jimmie Wilder
3401 LaCosta Way
Raleigh, NC 27610
RE: EXEMPTED PROJECT
PROJECT LOCATION/A]
AEC OCEAN HAZARD:''
Donald R. Hell Council Member
Douglas C. Medlin, Council Member
William J. (Buddy) Fowler, Council Member
Exemption # 118
NCE: 15A NCAC 07K.0212
aY'e. Drive, Surf City, NC —Fender Co.
I have reviewed the fitlorntattoriJsubmitted to this office my ja4(iiry concerning the necessary
filing of an application Io: lt minordevelopment permittrnderthe (oastsl Ai.w Management Act. 1 have
determined that the acti `i n you propose is exempt ltti(ia needs`ttg minor dWeloj�ment permit as long as it
remains consistent with.. our site drawing<dated 05-27-05, and it lsp tnezt _tlTe et3l�ditions specified
below. lryour plans shin,Ll change and your proJectsvll na 1ttntiCmeet thsoconditions, please contact
me before proceeding.
SAND FENCE EXCMP'1'l?1)
1. Sand lcuceo-nnis( not cxcced �' w licivI
2. Sand pl.,cQd l' lai .u'd as 1)0sslble to avoid impeding turtle activity
and public uallic.
3. In no case war th Icnoiin, bcyoald the furthc�t of dle following: the first line
of stable natw;,I'w rantibn.lhr t,�c of hefrontal or prinnan<dmic or the erosion
escarpment of i1w du v,
4. Non-funetionu,,u, damn!acd, oI un;ccured sand 10%cun_ ,hull be immediately removed by
the properly miie,
5. In no case shall sand tcuuing he 7ocatcd ,v rinccd on the wet sand beach.
This exemption to CAMA permit rcyuircatcats does not alleviate the necessity ofyour obtaining
any other State, Federal or Local authorization. This exemption expires 90 days from the date of this letter.
0cercly,
10114AWL
Donna Reece
Town of Surf City, LPO Signature of Applicant/Agent:
NC
52005
Root

Installing Sand Fence
Permit guidelines and exemption criteria for the installation of sand fences along the oceanfront took
effect Aug. 1.
When properly installed, sand fences help build dunes by trapping wind-blown sand. But if installed
improperly, they can impede public access to the beach, and can trap or endanger sea turtles, their
nests or hatchlings.
Under the new guidelines, property owners who follow certain criteria will be eligible for an exemption
from Coastal Area Management Act permit requirements. If property owners want to put up sand
fences that differ from the criteria, they will have to apply for a CAMA minor development permit. The
new rules do not apply to fences installed prior to Aug. 1.
What the guidelines say
The guidelines create a CAMA minor permit and an exemption for sand fencing. To qualify for the
exemption, installation of new sand fencing has to meet the following criteria:
• The fencing must be no taller than 5 feet and built from evenly spaced thin wooden vertical
slats connected with twisted wire.
• The fencing must be placed as far landward as possible to avoid interference with sea turtle
nesting, public access and use of the beach. It must not be placed on the wet -sand beach.
• If fencing is to be placed parallel to the shoreline, it must not be located waterward of the crest
of the frontal or primary dune.
• If fencing is to be placed waterward of the crest of the dune, it must be installed at a 45-
degree or greater angle to the shoreline. Each section of fence must not be longer than 10
feet, and sections must be spaced at least 7 feet apart.
• Fencing must not extend more than 10 feet beyond either the first line of stable natural
vegetation, the toe of the frontal or primary dune, or the erosion escarpment of the dune,
whichever is closest to the water.
• Sand fencing to be placed along public accesses may be as long as the access, and may
include a 45-degree funnel on the waterward end. The funnel may extend up to 10 feet
beyond the end of the access.
Why the guidelines are needed
In recent years, the amount of sand fencing along the coast has grown significantly as property
owners sought to protect their homes from storms and long-term beach erosion. As such, miles of
sand fencing — some of which is improperly installed or neglected — now line the state's beaches.
Because improper sand fencing can pose a threat to sea turtles, the state Wildlife Resources
Commission has developed voluntary sand fencing guidelines.
Several beach communities had attempted to address the issue through sand fe diw eejbut
the scope of the problem required state attention. The CRC's new regulatory ui r
developed in cooperation with the WRC and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Servic60%��'TON, NC
JUL 15 2005

5 5"J
.r_._-ClQb
Yh i rq
�� -7�
O (e
i
RECEIVED( `I
DCM ILMINGTON,
li 1 5 2005 C -ems--