52-22 Chappel, David

Permit Class Permit Number
NEW 52=22
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Quality
and
Coastal Resources Commission
it
for
X Major Development in an Area of Environmental Concern
pursuant to NCGS 113A-118
Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229
Issued to David W. Chappel, 5007 Holly Lane Morehead City, NC 28557
Authorizing development in Carteret County at adj. to Bosue Sound and the AIW W, at 5007 Holly
Lane, in Morehead City, as requested in the permittee's application dtd 1/17/22 incl art workplan drawings (3),
Sheet 2 of 4 dtd "Rev 5/17", Sheets 3 of 4 dtd "Rev 4/25" and Sheet 4 of 4 dtd 1/16/22.
This permit, issued on May 18, 2022 , is subject to compliance with the application (where
consistent with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes. set forth below. Any violation
7fthese terms may be subject to tines, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause urc ycriu.L w UP uwa auu vv.u.
Docking Facility Expansion
1) This permit authorizes only the finger pier and boat lift, and uses located in or over the water that are
expressly and specifically set forth in the permit application. No other structure, whether floating or
stationary, shall become a permanent part of this docking facility without permit modification. No
non -water dependent uses of structures shall be conducted on, in or over Public Trust waters without
permit modification.
2) No sewage, whether treated or untreated, shall be discharged at any time from any boats using the
docking facility. Any sewage discharged at the docking facility shall be considered a violation of this
permit for which the permittee is responsible. This prohibition shall be applied and enforced
throughout the entire existence of the permitted structure.
(See attached sheets for Additional Conditions)
This permit action may be appealed by the permittee or other
qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the issuing date.
This permit must be accessible on -site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification not covered
hereunder requires further Division approval.
All work must cease when the permit expires on
December 31, 2025
Signed by the authority of the Secretary or L)hQ ana me unair
of the Coastal Resources Commission.
- Ilu
Fa r Braxton C. Davis, Director
Division of Coastal Management
This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted.
In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees that
your project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal
Management,Program.
Signature of Permittee

David W. Chappel
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Permit No. 52-22
Page 2 of 3
3) The permittee shall install and maintain at his expense any signal lights or signals prescribed by the U.S.
Coast Guard, through regulation or otherwise, on the authorized facilities. At minimum, permanent
reflectors shall be attached to the structure in order to make it more visible during hours of darkness or
inclement weather.
4) This permit authorizes one (1) additional formalized boat slip for a maximum of three (3) formalized
boat slips at this docking facility.
5) The pier and associated structures shall have a minimum setback distance of 15 feet between any parts
of the structure and the adjacent property owner's area of riparian access to the east.
6) No attempt shall be made by the permittee to prevent the full and free use by the public of all navigable
waters at or adjacent to the authorized work.
7) The authorized structure and associated activity shall not cause an unacceptable interference with
navigation and shall not exceed the dimensions shown on the attached permit drawings.
Sedimentation and Erosion Control
8) In order to protect water quality, runoff from construction shall not visibly increase the amount of
suspended sediments in adjacent waters.
9) Appropriate sedimentation and erosion control devices, measures or structures shall be implemented to
ensure that eroded materials do not enter adjacent wetlands, watercourses or properties.
General
10) This permit shall not be assigned, transferred, sold, or otherwise disposed. of to a third party without the
written approval of the Division of Coastal Management.
11) All construction debris associated with the removal or construction of the permitted development shall
be contained within the authorized project area and disposed of in an approved upland location.
12) The permittee and/or his or her contractor shall meet with a representative of the Division prior to
project initiation.
NOTE: This permit does not eliminate the need to obtain any additional state, federal or local permits,
approvals or authorizations that may be required.
NOTE: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers authorized the project by way of Regional General Permit
197800056 (Action ID SAW-2022-00663).
NOTE: The N.C. Division of Water Resources authorized the proposed project by way of General Water
Quality Certification 4497 and assigned the project DWR Project No. 2022-0409.

David W. Chappel
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Permit No. 52-22
Page 3.of 3
NOTE: Future development of the permittee's property may require a modification of this permit.
Contact a representative of the Division at [phone] prior to the commencement of any
such activity for this determination. The permittee is further advised that many non -water
dependent activities are not authorized within 30 feet of the normal high-water level.
NOTE: An application processing fee of $250 was received by DCM for this project.

.0W06
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
Application Processing Notes
Applicant:) l Cha��P 1
Type: (Check all that apply)
New Iv/ Major Mod
Permit Coordinator:
Field Representative:
Date Tim
31 a 31 Dc as : cCWF fo,,- G mrtNe n i-,
�1161zz Q`i
4llg(zz U-7 A, -r&e�- lle iiswr�.. (:KS AW �6(-v cci;.,4J fc, A( --f4 A�Sn
c�{tC p',1�. i4 K/�S"Ind i'Lwws ahleciiws .. _/ fSC cai - aAs w,V te
�vt��GQ{fwS wti� 5G-tC Pf,W10 G A u.
I ! / J
/�tEv fd ,e(s,1.�,•,.�.IJ�G /N,,<< tint ec , ( v a, M,4 I r
5
/4
(17
I ��(�G�/11v11Y`T. .tc77'rr vpaa� WohS rt6T liCa�(Y�.
` 1 J
`�Y 1V GG(j• Lt"Ci.
Permit# Minor Mod Renewal Transfer
Message

DCM Coordinator: Permit #: 5 Z ZZ
MAILING DISTRIBUTION SHEET
i�4v',A
lfC - iV C —3os
Agentsaac4y' "b
DCM Field Offices
Elizabeth City Washington (with revised work plan drawings)
r Morehead City Ayi- Wilmington (OBJECTIONS— )
US ACOE Offices: I �a • Sc�o
Washington: Raleigh Bland (Beaufort, Camden, Chowan, Craven, Hertford, Hyde, Perquimans,
Tyrrell)
Josh Pelletier (Bertie, Currituck, Dare, Gates, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Washington)
Tom Steffans (NC DOT- Beaufort, Carteret, Craven, Pamlico)
Bill Biddlecwme (NC DOT -Remainder ECity/Washington District)
Wilmington:
Cultural Resources:
Public Water Supply:
Marine Fisheries:
NC DOT:
Shellfish Sanitation:
State Property:
DEMLR/DWR:
Greg Curry (Brunswick, New Hanover)
Liz Hair (Carteret, Onslow, Pender)
Brad Shaver (NCDOT-Brunswick, New Hanover, Onslow, Pender)
Renee Gledhill -Earley at [e-mail]
Heidi Cox (WIRO)
Kim Harding
David Harris
Shannon Jenkins / Sharon Gupton
Tim Walton / Mike Moser
Sheri Montalvo / Shelton Sullivan
Clif Whitfield (WARD)
Jimmy Harrison
Washington: Chris Pullinger-401
TBD - 401
Roger Tborpe-Stormwater
Garcy Ward- (NCDOT-Beaufort, Bertie, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Craven, Currituck,
Dare, Gates, Hertford, Hyde, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Perquimans, Tyrrell, Washington)
Wilmington: Holley Snider —401(Pender,Brunswick, New Hanover)
John Perry — 401 (Onslow, Carteret)
Christine Hall - Stormwater
Joanne Steenhuis - 401 (NCDOT-Brunswick, New Hanover, Onslow, Pender)
Wildlife Resources: Maria Dunn (WARD)
Natural Heritage Program Rodney Butler
LPO: I A✓fii l r-V(,
(NCDOT) Travis Wilson

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
BRAXTON DAVIS
Director
Mr. Lawrence Twisdale
Dear Mr. Twisdale,
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
May 18, 2022
(via email latwisdalenicloud.com)
This letter is intended to notify you, of the issuance of a CAMA Major Permit No. 52-22 for
proposed development by David W. Chappel, located at 5007 Holly Lane., in Morehead City,
Carteret County. The authorized project consists of the expansion of an existing docking facility
to three slips. The proposed project has been determined to comply with the Rules of the Coastal
Resources Commission and as such, a permit has been issued to authorize the development. I
have enclosed a copy of the permit modification for reference.
If you wish to contest our decision to issue this permit, you may file a request for a Third -Party
Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. 113A-121.1(b). The Chair of the Coastal Resources Commission
will consider the case and determine whether to grant your request to file a Contested Case
Hearing in the Office of Administrative Hearings. The hearing request must be filed with the
Director, Division of Coastal Management, in writing and must be received within twenty (20)
days of the disputed permit decision. More information about this process as well as the forms
are available on DCM's website, here: https://deg.nc.Pov/about/divisions/coastal-
mana¢ement/coastal-management-permits/variances-appeals
If you would like to discuss the specifics of the process, please feel free to contact DCM legal
counsel DEQ Asst. General Counsel Christine Goebel by email at Christine.eoebel&ncdenr.gov
Sincerely,
Gregg Bodnar
Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
CC: DCM files
DEQ Asst. GC Christine Goebel, via email
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality 1 Division of Coastal Management
Morehead City Office 1 400 Commerce Avenue I Moorehead City, North Carolina 28557
252.8082808

Bodnar, Gregg
From:
Bodnar, Gregg
Sent:
Wednesday, May 18, 2022 9:23 AM
To:
[e-mail]
Cc:
Styron, Heather M.; Goebel, Christine A
Subject:
Chappel CAMA permit notification
Attachments:
Twisdale (David Chappel).pdf; 52-22 David W Chappel.pdf
Morning Mr. Twisdale,
Please see the attached for notification of the issuance of the CAMA Permit to Mr. David W. Chappel.
Regards,
Gregg Bodnar
Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
Department of Environmental Quality
[phone] (NEW OFFICE NUMBER)
Greee.Bodnar@ncdenr.¢ov
Find a Field Rep (arcqis.com)
Email Correspondence to and from this address is hubject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Bodnar, Gregg
From: Mail Delivery System <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2022 9:23 AM
Subject: Delivered: Chappel CAMA permit notification
This is the mail system at host ci74p00im-qukt09072502.me.com
Your message was successfully delivered to the destination(s)
listed below. If the message was delivered to mailbox you will
receive no further notifications. Otherwise you may still receive
notifications of mail delivery errors from other systems.
The mail system
<[e-mail]>: delivery via mailgateway-smtp.p24. prod.me.com:443:
225291bb-06b24ca2-a71d-6ec4930ecc9b Ok, uid 15575; 1423 ms

IN Mr-1
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
(last revised 12127106)
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1. Primary Applicant/Landowner Information
Business Name
Project Name (if applicable) - —
Applicant 1: First Name
7Av1v
MI
W
last Name
C n E`
Applicant 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
If additional apphcams, please attach an additional page(s) with names listed.
Mailing Address
"7-00,7 140ay i w(
PO Box
I
City
A40RENEl c/rr
State
/Ni
ZIP
11gss7
Country
I t/Sp
Phone No.
Zs2 sir- 4170Z.W-
FAX No.
- -
Street address (d different from above)
city
State
ZIP
Email
2. AgwWontractor Information
Business Name
Agent/Contractor 1: First Name
gr
MI
kwc(-
Last Name
I.A&f
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Mailing Address
vLi R (rzFa1 r
)ZOOD
PO Box
City
NFL-
State
NG
ZIP
1$S62
I
Phone No. 1
Z5Z -665
ext.
Phone No. 2
ext.
FAX No.
Contractor i
�9�92
Street Address (A different from above)
I City
I State
ZIP
Email
l�lef�b�o% Q c�rHe,'�,
coN,
<Form continues on back>
RECEIVED
FEB 0 4 2022
tbz-a0a-z808 :: 1-888-4BGOAST :: ww-,,�, s. o a sta l m a n a 9 e m e n t.gOM-MHD CITY

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 2 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
3. Project Location
County (can be multiple)
Street Address
State Rd. N
l�AkT 7
Say% NcLL 1' (.SNL�
Subdivision Name
Coy
slate
Zip
A4176*tL V)Uo06F
Ne—
'Z85S7
Phone No.
Lot No. (a) (d many, attach additional page with list)
251 -S3/ -97OZ ext.
I . , , soar L6 LS AWL
a. In which NC river basin is the project located?
b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
Nw rl
06ve Sou/v>
c. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade?
d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project she.
*Natural ❑Manmade []Unknown
904LV j- <6VANv
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
I. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
`(Yes []No
7
work falls within.
Incl&-NE,oD clrl
4. Site Description
a.
Total length of shoreline on the tract (8.)
b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.)
c.
Size of individual lot(s)
d. Approximate elevation of tract above NH W (normal high water) or
N /'1 A
NWL (normal water level) /
(If many lot sizes, please attach addfaonal page with a list)
NHW or ❑NWL f 7
e.
Vegetation on tract
f.
Man-made (natures and uses now on tract
2Esl�7c-Nfinc. ��Lun�b Garta�G �•�c,�G
/ ,
g.
Identify and describe the existing land uses Ito the proposed project she.
2(SIQENf/AL %h/ElGiN6
h.
How does local government zone the tract?
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
Zf'$ / rJPNT/0 C.
Attach zoning compliance certificate, it applicable)
Yes ❑No ❑NA
j.
Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? []Yes No
k.
Has a professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. ❑Yes ❑No A
If yes, by whom?
I.
Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a ❑Yes No []NA
National Register listed or eligible property?
<Form continues on next page> RECEIVED
FEB 0 4 A22
252-808-2808 .. 'I-a66-41tt:u ASi .. ww w.ne co as taus an a gem ent.net
DCM-MHD CITY

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 3 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
m. (I) Are there wetlands on the site?
as ❑No
(ii) Are there coastal wetlands on the site?
Yes []No
(iii) If yes to either (i) or (ii) above, has a delineation been conducted?
❑Yes�No
(Affach documentation, iI availabk)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
6rzew-ly �iD scPi,e i M-e
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
w(-4�
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems.
5✓/L,iNGE
TIvN �oFF
S. Acdvides and impacts
a. Will the project be for commercial, pudic, or private use?
❑Commercial ❑Public/Govemmernt
rivaie/Communiry
b. Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
11z6<f4Pl/01VN` / 30nllN6
c. Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used
during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
d. List all development activities you propose.
3'� 26' r-�Nb�c vwe
7tii8' �,Nf;�2 f'�ocK u„n�
iy't< 16' IV% I1(-T'
e. Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both?
NFt�
Gwi[K
I. What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project?
7 C6 q. Ft or []Acres
g. Will the proposed project encroach on any pudic easement, public acoessway or other area
❑Yes []No NA
that the public has established use of?
h. Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
NIA
i. Will wastewater or stormwater be discharged into a wetland?
❑Yes No ❑NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water?
[]Yes ❑!o�
j. Is there any mitigation proposed?
❑Yes [IN o NA
8 yes, attach a mitigation proposal.
<Form continues on baclo RECEIVED
FEB 0 4 2022
252-888-2888 .. 1-888-4RCOASY .. wrduv.nccck;d5.x;xb,la,<ua.A;gemerAx.tXM-M"DCITY

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 4 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
6. Additional Information
In addition to this completed application form, (110P-1) the following items below, if applicable, must be submitted in order for the application
package to be complete. hems (a) - M are ahveys applicable to any major development application. Please aonsuk the application
instruction booklet on taw to properly prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
f. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name ?P(/L r4,(1, 0A) (SOOS 00"1 ON(- r 1pije-j Phone No.
Address 50eS ML[,t' (,.uNF AvAip(pp CITY Nc- ZPSSV
Name eAa1gef—Cc Jj-/SDPLE' (Soo? NoLe'6oMt- /Jfuc) Phone No.
Address a 128 C,41GProT1,/PtJ WQ f
Name Phone No.
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permieee, and issuing dates.
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, if applicable.
i. Wetland delineation, if necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10), if necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
7. Certification and Permission to Ender on Land
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application isjOi0ful to the best of my knowledge.
Date 1- 17 - Z)ZZ. Print Name
Signature
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed project.
❑DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information ❑DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
❑DCM MP-3 Upland Development
'J9bCM MP-4 Structures Information
RECEIVED
FEB 0 4 2022
pem-mmt) cry
252.808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST .: www.nccoastaimanagement.net

Form DCM MP-4
STRUCTURES
(Construction within Public Trust Areas)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
1. DOCKING FACILITY/MARINA CHARACTERISTICS
❑This section not applicable
a. (i) Is the docking fadliry/marina:
❑Commercial ❑Public/Govemment Xprivale/Community
b. (i) Will the facility be open to the general pudic?
Dyes
X0
c. (i) Dock(s) and/or pier(s)
d. (i) Are Finger Piers included? XYes []No
(ii) Number 0
d yes:
(iii) Length
(ii) Number
Z6
/?8�
(iv) Width
(iii) length
(v) Floating []Yes []No
(iv) Width
(v) Floating []Yes fNo
�.L
e. (i) Are Platforms included? ❑Yes IEINo
I. (i) Are Boatli(ts included? PdYes []No
If yes: ' \
8 yes:
(it) Number
(ii) Number
(iii) Length
(iii) Length
(iv) Width
i
(iv) Width �6
(v) Floating ❑Yes ❑No
Note: Roofed areas are calculated from dnphne dimensions.
g. (i) Number of slips proposed
h. Check all the types of services to be provided.
I
❑ Full service, induding travel lift and/or rail, repair or
(ii) Number of slips existing
maintenance service
2
❑ Dockage, fuel, and marine supplies
Dockage ("wet slips") only, number of slips: 3
❑ Dry storage; number of boats:
❑ Boat ramp(s); number of boat ramps:
❑ Other, please describe:
i. Check the proposed type of siting: j. Describe the typical boats to be served (e.g., open runabout,
❑ Land cut and access channel charter boats, sail boats, mixed types).
❑Open water; dredging for basin and/or channel M'P' X✓N/Jlga ✓r
Open water; no dredging required
Other, please describe:
k. Typical boat length: / I. (i) Will the 1 I' be open to the general public?
❑Yes ",No
m. (i)Wiillthe facility have tie pilings? / RECEIVED
'Yes ❑No
(ii) If yes number of tie pilings?
2 E-Ir tsT,;oE FEB 0 4 ,2022
252-808-2808:: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastaimanaemient.net
DCM-MHD CITY
revised: 12/27/06

Form DCM MP-4 (Structures, Page 2 of 4)
2. DOCKING FACILITYANARINA OPERA77ONS El This section not applicable
a. Check each of the following sanitary faclikes that will be included in the proposed project.
❑ Office Toilets
❑ Toilets for patrons; Number: ; Location: N /N
❑ Showers
❑ Boatholding tank pumpout; Give type and location:
b. Describe treatment type and disposal location for all sanitary wastewater.
C. Describe the disposal of solid waste, fish offal and trash.
d. How will overboard discharge of sewage from boats be
e. (i) Give the location and number of 'No Sewage Discharge" signs propos^ed.
/
/' A
(i) Give the location and number of "Pumpout Available' sgns; proposed.
I. Describe the spew design, it applicable, for containing industrial type pollutants, such as paint, sandblasting waste antl petroleum products.
g. Where will residue tram vessel maintenance be disposed of?
N�
h. Give the number of channel markers and "No Wake" signs proposed.
i. Give the location of fuel -handling facilities, and describe the safety measures planned to protect area water qualily.
I. What will be the marina policy on overnight and live -aboard dockage?
M
k. Describe design measures that promote boat basin flushing?
I. If this project is an expansion of an existing manna, what types of services are currently provided?
RECEIVED
FEB 0 4 2022
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.r ccoastalmanagement.net
DCM-MHD CITY
revised: 12i27t06

Form DCM MP-4 (structures, Page 3 of 4)
m. Is the marinydockirig tacdity proposed within a primary or secondary nursery area?
[]Yes No
n. Is the madna/docking facility proposed within or adjacent to any shellfish harvesting area?
❑Yes j(INo
o. Is the marinaidocking facility proposed within or adjacent to coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom
(SB), a other wetlands (WL)? if any boxes are checked, provide the number of square feet affected.
W Q ❑SAV _ ❑SB
_
WL []None
p. Is the proposed manna/docking facility located within or within dose proximity to any shellfish leases? []Yes No
If yes, give the name and address of the leasel older(s), and give the proximity to the lease.
13. BOATHOUSE (including covered lifts) J47his section not applicable
a. (i) is the boathouse stmcture(s):
❑Commercial ❑PubliclGovemment ❑Private/Community
(ii) Number
(iii) Length
(iv) Width
Note: Roofed areas are cakwlated from dripfine dimensions,.
14. GROIN (e.g., wood, sheelpile, etc. If a rock gran, use MP-2, Excavation and Fill.) A his wylton not applicable
a. (i) Number
(ii) Length
(iii) Width
15. BREAKWATER (e.g., wood, sheelpile, etc.) )O7his section not applicable
a. Length
c. Maximum distance beyond NHW, NWL or wetlands
b. Average distance from NHW, NWL, or wetlands
6. MOORING PILINGS and BUOYS This section not applicable
a. Is the strocture(s):
[]Commercial ❑PublidGovemmern ❑Private/Communfty
C. Distance to be placed beyond shoreline
Note: This should be measured from marsh edge, if present.
e. Arc of the swing _
b. Number
d. Description of buoy (color, inscription, size, anchor, etc.)
RECEIVED
FEB 0 4 2022
DCM-MHD CITY
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastalmanagement,net revised: 72f27106

Form DCM MP-4 (Structures, Page 4 of 4)
7. GENERAL
a. Proximity of structure(s) to adjacent riparian property lines
iIS
Note: For buoy or mooring piling, use arc of swing including length
of vessel.
c. Width of water body
e. (i) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the project?
[]Yes Wo INA
(ii) 0 yes, explain /what type and how they will be implemented.
b. Proximity of slructure(s) to adjacent docking facilities.
r-itO / DN -, / ki0 / *) G7�S )
d. Water depth at waterward end of structure at NLW or NWL
5 ,1 i
18. OTHER 1$This section not applicable
a. Give complete description:
/10, 1,7
Date
�ir7 G�p�t�lc Arbee 17-4"/7"
Project Name
A,)A4:
Applicant
Applicant Signature
RECEIVED
FEB 0 4 2022
DCM-MHD CITY
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastalmanaaement.net revised: 12/27/06

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: David Chappell c/o Andre Webb
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: 5007 Holly Lane, Morehead City, Carteret County
State Plane Coordinates - Longitude: 76 47' 31.58", Latitude: 34 43' 33.03"
INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit — 3/1/2022
Was Applicant Present.- No
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received Complete — 2/21/2022
Office — Morehead City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan — Morehead City
Land Classification from LUP — Single Family Residential
(B) AEC(s) Involved: PTA
(C) . Water Dependent: yes
(D) Intended Use: Private
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing — Septic Systems
Planned- none
(F) Type of Structures: Existing — bulkhead, driveway, house, garage and 2 slip
pier
Planned — relocation of existing wet -slip and tie pilings to
east side of pier, add a third slip with boatlift and two
fingers piers to the existing 2-slip docking facility.
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION:
DREDGED FILLED
(A) Shallow bottom
n/a
n/a
656sf Inc.
432sf Shaded
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 656 square feet
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: SA, HQW
8. PROJECT SUMMARY:
The applicant is proposing to relocate the existing wet -slip and tie pilings that are
currently along the west side of the pier to the east side of the pier. They are also
proposing to add a third slip with boatlift and two finger piers to the existing two
slip docking facility. There is currently a single family residence with driveway,
bulkhead and existing two slip docking facility. A total of three slips are proposed

Field Investigation Report: Owen Andrews
c/o Andre Webb
Page 02
(2 existing and 1 new). The boat size would be limited to a maximum of 28' and
would be of open runabout design. Water depths within the existing and proposed
slip areas are at least -4' nlw.
9. Project Description
The existing .54-acre (23,609sf) tract is located at 5007 Holly Lane, Morehead City,
Carteret County. The site is found by following Highway 70 East into the Morehead City
town limits. Continue along Highway 70 through the 4-way lights at the intersection of
Highway 24 and Bridges Street Extension for approximately .23 miles and turn right onto
Rochelle Drive. Follow Rochelle Drive for .56 miles and turn right onto Holly Lane.
Continue on Holly Lane for approximately 300 feet. The property is located on the left.
The site is along the north side of Bogue Sound and stabilized with a bulkhead, has
an elevation of 4' above NHW and has 92' of shoreline per the applicant.
The waters of Bogue Sound adjacent to the project areas are classified as "SA,
HQW" by the Division of Water Resources. The waters of Bogue Sound within this
area are open to shellfish harvesting and are not PNA. According to the 2008 NC
DMF SAV delineations via google earth special data, there is sparse SAV along the
landward section of the pier but no SAV within the existing and proposed slip areas.
There is no dredging proposed within navigable waters and there are no known
historic or archaeological areas of value known within the project sites.
10. Proposed Proiect
h/i : FN
The applicant is proposing to -relocate -the existing-we"lip-md-tie-pihngs-that-are
c»„ ULy-alalnne the eve cide��he-pier-to-the-east-side-of-the-ex-ist�ing-pier-. They are
also proposing a third slip with boatlift along the west side of the existing boatlift
and two finger piers between the existing and proposed boatlifts.
All work would not exceed a maximum distance of 295' from the bulkhead and
maintain a distance of approximately 25' from the Twisdale/Chappell riparian
access line and approximately 17' to 40' from the Chappell/Kerwin riparian access
line.
11. Anticipated Impacts:
The development would shade 432 sf and incorporate 656 sf of shallow bottom
habitat. The proposed slip relocation and third slip addition would not interfere with
navigation, would meet the '/4 width rule and not extend into the channel portion of
Bogue Sound. There would be no impacts to wetlands, shellfish or SAV resources.
Submitted by: Heather Styron Date: 3/14/2022 Morehead City District Office

Project Narrative for David Chappel
To Whom it may concern,
Our project is located at 5007 Holly Lane in Morehead City, NC. We are proposing to
install a new 3'x18' finger dock, 3'x26' finger dock and a 14'xi 6' boat lift. The purpose of
this project is for recreational boating, fishing and wildlife observation. Thank you for your time
and consideration on this proposal. The project proponent hereby certifies that all information
contained heroines true, accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. The
project proponent hereby requests the the certifying authority review and take action on this
CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
Sincerely,
Andre Webb
RECEIVED
FEB 0 4 20?.2
DCM-MHD CITY

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
BRAXTON DAVIS
Director
Carteret News Times
PO Box 1679
Morehead City, NC 28557
Re: Public Notice - David Chappell
Dear Sir:
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
March 14, 2022
Please publish the attached Notice in the 3/20/2022 issue of the Carteret News Times.
The State Office of Budget and Management requires an original Affidavit of Publication
prior to payment for newspaper advertising. Please send the affidavit, an original copy
of the published notice, and an original invoice to Jessica Gibson, NC Division of
Coastal Management, 400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557,
Telephone [phone].
Thank you for your assistance in this matter. If you should have any questions, please contact
me at our Morehead City office.
Sincerely,
Heather M. Styron
Heather M. Styron
Coastal Management Representative
vwonom,imw.n�
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality 1 Division of Coastal Management
Morehead City Office 1 400 Commerce Avenue I Moorehead City, North Carolina 28557
252.808.2808

NOTICE OF FILING OF
APPLICATION FOR CAMA MAJOR
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
The Department of Environment and Natural Resources hereby gives public notice as
required by NCGS 113A-119(b) that application for a development permit in an Area of
Environmental Concern as designated under the CAMA was received as complete on
2/21/2022. According to said application, Mr. David Chappell proposes the addition of a
third slip with boatlift and finger piers to the existing 2 slip docking facility at 5007 Holly
Lane in Morehead City, NC. A copy of the entire application may be examined or copied at
the office of Heather Styron, NC Division of Coastal Management, located at 400 Commerce
Avenue, Morehead City, NC, [phone] during normal business hours.
Comments mailed to Braxton Davis, Director, Division of Coastal Management, 400
Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, N.C. 28557, prior to 4/9/2022, will be considered in
making the permit decision. Later comments will be accepted and considered up to the time
of permit decision. Project modification may occur based on review and comment by the
public and state and federal agencies. Notice of the permit decision in this matter will be
provided upon written request.
PUBLISH ON: 3/20/2022
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Coastal Management
Morehead City Office 1 400 Commerce Avenue I Moorehead City, North Carolina 28557
NOmii fiFIXIN4
om.mmofrmWnmmWwv� /"� 252.808.2808

Rol( COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
BRAXTON DAVIS
Director
March 14, 2022
C/o Andre Webb
3413 Old Airport Road
New Bern, NC 29792
Dear Mr. Chappell:
The NC Division of Coastal Management hereby acknowledges receipt of your application for State
approval for development of your project at 5007 Holly Lane in Morehead City, Carteret County. The
application was received as complete on 2/21/2022, and appears to be adequate for processing at this time.
The projected deadline for making a decision is 5/7/2022. An additional 75-day review period is provided
by law when such time is necessary to complete the review. If you have not been notified of a final action
by the initial deadline stated above, you should consider the review period extended. Under those
circumstances, this letter will serve as your notice of an extended review. However, an additional letter
will be provided on or about the 75th day.
If this agency does not render a permit decision within 70 days from 2/21/2022, you may request a
meeting with the Director of the Division of Coastal Management and permit staff to discuss the status of
your project. Such a meeting will be held within five working days from the receipt of your written
request and shall include the property owner, developer, and project designer/consultant.
NCGS 113A-119(b) requires that Notice of an application be posted at the location of the proposed
-.=_deveropmenc�Enclosed-you"will find a "Notice of Permit Filing _postcard ynkch=must=be posted=at-the
property of your proposed development. You should post this notice at a conspicuous point along your
property where it can be observed from a public road. Some examples would be: Nailing the notice card
to a telephone'pole or tree along the road right-of-way fronting your property, or at a point along the road
right-of-way where a private road would lead one into your property. Failure to post this notice could result
in an incomplete application.
An onsite inspection will be made, and if additional information is required, you will be contacted by the
appropriate State or Federal agency. Please contact me if you have any questions and notify me in writing
if you wish to receive a copy of my field report and/or comments from reviewing agencies.
Sincerely,
feather n-t. stluron
Heather M. Styron
Coastal Management Representative
DEQ��
ow��a�u moo\ r
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Coastal Management
Morehead City Office 1 400 Commerce Avenue I Moorehead City. North Carolina 28557
252.808.2808

r
PF
r�
;T�.T7rVr,
,'IM21 ter
1 .
A Iffy AT
r �l
■rotI
: i__ ,■ ►.►
r
~AT1P D

I bbt$/U0
Exhibit B
z
�^\` IYJSIIM:
/ SftN Wil
CPMRJY!/
fiY1PiM' ```
nMIS
L64C Jrr
.Lpy ... ._.
-
Jy
_?•. •. {�
^{ ,.•i-'
r•{
or {SIRSVANr TONCGS"W4 TNIS w MY NOT BEA
a GERT<<ED SURVEYANDHAS NOTBEFN RENENEO OYA L'
M'.1Y
uvrAoeExru mvzau
a� �'
{. 1.
6
N
GOVE104ENT AGENCY FOR COLPLUNGE MM ANY MPL
OMDDEVMOPLENTPEGULAMWMN SNOTBEEN
?
.-
i{_\.--
REVJWVFORCOLMPL FrRff1RECOfB1NGREWM
FORPUT3
a
8
�
Q
A)�•`
A
s
ZoPPS
aumn
\\l
-all"W auft-
rtovrLAa
oem Wu fn rA¢ yr
a® War en Morn,
Moro,
LELIYI M MdEm
Ba
ao War m
P®Wx w Motor`
NUWErr vAQLn F�
I// � E
Nor"
C®!'AL'99. MGE ll! DJ6IgiUATA 1NfMY1W.YFAYMNUF
F
MAW(wArce MarLl)a[@LDN.SHarLDloor vA naBan wKra
� srr
Toru,wuorv,Iux-v,wrsyrt •ns�c.{awaaurzrEnw.
![AIMI NPI NMrEA LL'!E II 1111E MOMT' NF.
IA r1as 9!{Er, M61#/CNAO]YSAkRLDT1[MnMULMM IrA161 WEE.
�
FKVRTYE ILEATaIa ROrolp.E Xla fDN 3lALWY'i11MH 6M6.
NV E/RCN4F N1FAAr rA M64
wrsenro T'K0Y1wrzAAMAOMgMI san: xorLaurm.
nvw:rNfoavEo urns Nor s.F{rrcn. rA.LwnrorvaemAxs
E
MCV[RRAIEO FIS•. WYDIM'S'4i.C.lSMf TI' WOMI($TM@T9Cfk
���
IOAF ULb'GN�RMR MNAVSQWf.ICI1UN�MMCRdE{OI4MIInG
�TEnFAIX MA
MY9Y9N4pl. M0 D(SOIYrKMPImTfD W n%Y VA r%F IL N WEO
aoormP.�¢m, mrMaxwuvlas xor.vmE.mAanwon®wsauw
Iaa1AAa1YlYY/AVKff AtX.F1�k r1Ui m urM CEIFaSF1ASGYIDNiW
IIUlIRl6.EDMWnMESK I:InON.,1W rINT r10 NV IMS MrrallO�
V MRAIOiVII4LrIfFInMWD SIAYFRNL 1Y NORA1 LM1uM fL
nasararorr.rvl am .4S
0
KeWn R. Barefoot PlS
Traswr arorarneaLom Nerssoao frANPMaf
an a a n m
gArraCSGNE
08452PSIa6Am
MGAbYEPO4IYAN
�SUXIRFYM
DAM W.CHAPPM
rARTaErmlLurr
fRWc.M]L
.Dews
wxrRcumuxA
AtvrNR awaroor, FES LQBa
LMF.CXAPPM
NDearrm
BEING M PROPFAIYDBTIRa®M DEFD BG1OA 9A ruGE L3L
S[LIE;1•-m
ABWYJpTAC xna
aNCEEO aaaruR IAGF N>eKL161m NrNF
MABOf O>, X11O
L1LI.NArb>�
CAIfIBrETC9wfrYREGaiFN OF NEtIIi
AWISED AvaOr LR ]a10
(1RN462L
RECEIVED
FEB 0 4 2022
...._- _._.._....._........... ....... _..._..... ........ _.....D.CM-MHD CITY

I ecauzu5
EXHIBIT A
Metes and Bounds description for:
DAVID W. CHAPPELL and LISA F. CHAPPELL
5007 Holly Lane, Morehead City
PIN 15 = 636614322589000
Beginning at a tie down at a steel nail in centerline intersection of Rochelle Dr and
Holly Ln, from there N 74°06' 00" W, 308.62' to a point in the centerline of Holly Ln,
then S 15° 44' 19" W, 27.84' to the point of beginning, an existing concrete
monument at the NW corner of the property in the RIW of Holly Ln. from there
along the RIW of Holly Ln. S 740 06' 00" E, 92.00' to an existing iron pipe at the base
of a steel fence post, from there S 15° 44' 19" W, 200.00 to an iron pipe set on line,
then continuing S 15° 44' 19" W, 52.17 to a point on a headwall at the high water
line of Bogue Sound, then along highwater mark of Bogue Sound and the headwall
N 81° 46' 35" W, 30.26', N 750 30' 22" W, 24.91', N 71° 1T 32" W, 37.15', to an
existing MAG nail in the bulkhead cap, then N 15° 44' 19" E, 32.73' to an iron pipe
on line, then continuing N 15° 4T 19" E, 22.27' to a point online, then continuing N
15° 44' 19" E, 200.00' to the point of beginning, an existing concrete monument, and
being the same property as shown on a survey by Kevin R. Barefoot, PIS, attached
as Exhibit B to this deed and incorporated herein by reference.
The above property conveyed runs from Holly Lane to the highwater mark of Bogue
Sound and also conveyed are all riparian and littoral rights associated with the
property which abuts Bogue Sound.
RECEIVED
FEB 0 4 2022
DCM-MHD CITY

FOR REGISTRATION REGISTER OF DEEDS
Karen S. Hardesty
Carteret County, NC
April 6, 2020 3:25:32 PM
DEED # Pages: 4
Fee:$26.00 NC Revenue Stamp: $3,150. 00
FILE # 1668205
r
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
Excise Tax: $ 3,150.00
Parcel Identifier No. 636614322589000 Verified by County on the _ day of 20_
By:
Mall/Box to: John M. Harris, White & Allen, P. A., 304 N. 35th Street, Morehead City, NC 28557
This instrument was prepared by: White & Allen, P. A- 304 N. 35th Strut Morehead City. NC 28557 - File #M 125034-I
Brief description for the Index: LOT Part L6 L5, Mitchell Village
THIS DEED made this 6th day of April , 2020 , by and between
Richard D. Giles and wife,
Carolyn P. Giles
PO Box 1837
Morehead City, NC 28557
GRANTEE
David W Chappell and wife,
Lisa F. Chappell
4000 Dunhagan Road
Greenville, NC 27858
Enter in appropriate block for each Grantor and Grantee: name, mailing address, and, if appropriate, characmr of entity, e.g
corporation or partnership.
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, theirbeirs, successors, and assigns, and shall incltldesingular,
plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context
W ITNESSETH, that theGrantor, for a vahlable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receiptof which is hereby acknowledged, has and by
these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee in fee simple, all that certain lot, parcel of land or condominium unit
situated in the City of Morehead City I Morehead Township, Carteret County,
North Carolina and more particularly described as follows:
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION
submitted electronically by 'White a Allen MHC'
in compliance with North Carolina statutes governing recordable documents
and the terms of the submitter agreement with the Carteret County Register of Deeds.
The property hereinabove described was acquired by Grantor by instrument recorded in Book 953 page 131
All or a portion of the property herein conveyed _ includes or X does not include the primary resideoce of a Grantor.
A map showing the above described property is recorded in Plat Book
Page I of 2
NC Bar Association Farm No. 3 ®1976, Revised ® 1977. 2002, 2013
Printed by Ageeane it with the NC Bar Association —1991 RECEIVED
page
This sumdwd Earn has been approved by:
North Carolina Bar Association —NC Bar Form No. 3
FEB 0 4, 2022
DCM-MHD CITY

I bbt$ZUD
TO HAVE AND TO 1101D the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging to the Grantee in fcc
simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple, has the right to convey the same in fee
simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and that Grantor will warrant and defend the tide against the lawful
claims of all persons whomsoever, other than the following exceptions:
2020 ad valorem taxes; utility easements and unviolated restrictions of record.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has duly executed the foregoing
(Entity Name)
Printrrype Name &
Print/Cype Name & Title:
(SEAL)
PAutMype Name:
Pr'ot/rype Name & Title: Print/Type Name:
State of North Carolina - County or City of Carteret
1, the undersigned Notary Public of the County or City of rarreret — and State aforesaid, certify that
Richard D. Giles personally appeared before me this day and acknowledxed the due
exe �ttioo of the foregoing instrument for the purpospaQ)1'!'tSblagressed. Witness my hand and Notarial stamp or seal this day of
�$jAAorTT...`gGG;-
My Commission Expires: /(J.t '% 4fO.;f /van otary Public
(Affix Seal) ri A, , ,- o Notary's Printed or Typed game
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA P ' •• .. lA
COUNTY OF CARTERETCOUN
1, Teresa T. Vaughan, a Notary Public for the State of North Carolina and County of Carteret,
do hereby certify that RICHARD D. GILES attomey-in-fact for CAROLYN P. GILES personally
appeared before me this day and being by me duly sworn says that he executed the foregoing and
annexed instrument. Authority to execute and acknowledge said instrument is coppined in
instruments duly executed, acknowledged and recorded on the 3D �iay 960,2020, Carteret
County Registry, and that this instrument was executed under and by virtue of the authority given
by said instrument granting him power of attorney. I do further certify that the said RICHARD D.
GILES acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing and annexed instrument for the purposes
therein expressed for and in behalf of the said CAROLYN P. GILES that the same was voluntarily
si�4d in the capacity indicated. Witness my hand and official seal this /sf day of April, 2020.
*regg,ded in Book 1667, Page 392
V? Teresa T. Vaug
f4y Cvriilm igi7 itgtires: 1/29/2025
___ _(Official Seal)
Notary Public
RECEIVED
FEB 0 4 2022
DCM-MHD Clry

)Y COOPER
wrnor
.IZABETH S. BISER
;retary
tAXTON DAVIS
ector
March 15, 2022
MEMORANDUM.
IV
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
FROM: Gregg Bodnar, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
NCDEQ - Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave., Morehead City, NC 28557
252-515-5416 (Courier 04-16-33)
greQn.bodnar(ZDncdenr.goy
SUBJECT: CAMA Major Permit Application Review
Applicant: David Chappel
Project Location: 5007 Holly Ln, Morehead City, Carteret County
Proposed Project: Install new docks and boat lift
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
return this form to Gregg Bodnar at the address above by April 12, 2022. If you have any
questions regarding the proposed project, contact Heather Styron [phone] when appropriate, in-
depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
**Additional comments may be attached**
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
PRINT NAME
AGENCY
SIGNATURE
DATE
r A :V North Carolina Department of Envl n mtal Quality I DMslon of Coastal Management

DCM Coordinator: Greve Bodnar
Distributed Yes® No ❑
Applicant: Distribution Date:
Ovil 9\ 0\,
AGENCY
WIRO
WARO
LPO
Z (? it `�.Q
Rachel Love Adrick MHC
Rachel Love Adrick Washingon
DCM Planner
Mike Christenbury Wilmington
Charlan Owens Eliz City
US COE:
Liz Hair
Raleigh Bland (Beaufort Camden,
(Carteret Onslow, Pender)
Chowan, Craven, Hertford, Hyde,
Greg Curry
Perquimans, Tyrrell)
(Brunswick, New Hanover)
Josh Peletier — (Bertie, Currituck, Dare, Gates,
US COE (NC DOT)
DOT Brad Shaver
Pamlico, Pasquotank, Washington)
(Brunswick, New Hanover, Onslow,
DOT - Tom Steffans—(Beaufort, Carteret,
Pender)
Craven, Pamlico
Mark Zeigler (Onslow, Pender, New
Community Assistance
Hanover, Brunswick)
Lee Padrick (Beaufort, Carteret
liae Padrick (Aeaufort Carteret, Craven
Craven, Eliz City, Pamlico, Washington)
Eliz City, Pamlico, Washington
Cultural Resources
Renee Gledhill-EarleyS4
Renee Gledhill -Earley
Div. of Water
Infrastructure
Heidi Cox
all Whitfield
Marine fisheries
)/,�1(� Nafd�
James Harrison
David Harris
NC DOT
David Harris
Shellfish Sanitation
Shannon Jenkins & Sharon Gupton
Shannon Jenkins & Sharon Gu ton
State Property
Tim Walton & Mike Moser & Wanda
Tim Walton & Mike Moser &
Hillard
Wanda Hillard
DEMLR/DWR:
Sheri A. Montalvo
Sheri A. Montalvo
(NC DOT)
Kristy Lynn Carpenter
Kristy Lynn Carpenter
DEMLR
Sediment & Erosion
Dan Sams ! �e ,<<
Samir Dumpor
Storm water
Christine Hall
Roger Thorpe
DWR 401
Robb Mairs (Carteret, New Hanover
Chris Pullinger
Onslow, Pender,Brunswick — until further
notice)
(NC DOT)
Joanne Steenhuis Brunswick, New
Garcy Ward
Hanover, Onslow, Pender
WRC
Maria Dunn ( WAR%,.
Maria Dunn (WARO)
WRC (NC DOT)
Travis Wilson
Travis Wilson
Natural Heritage Program
Rodney Butler
Rodney Butler
T:\MAJOR PERMITS SECTION\Permits\Forms and Templates\Admin\Mai Comment Distribution Sheet 2020.docx

.taro
MAJOR PERMIT FEE MATRIX -g.! 03(
Applicant: (_�mn'OeY
Selection
Development Type
Fee
DCM % 9316256253)
1601430
DWQ %
41)(14300
I. Private, non-commercial
development that does not
$250
100% ($250)
0% ($0)
involve the filling or
excavation of any wetlands
or open water areas:
II. Public or commercial
development that does not
$400
100% ($400)
0% ($0)
involve the filling or
excavation of any wetlands
or open water areas:
❑
Major Modification to a
$250
100% ($250)
0% ($0)
CAMA Major permit
III. For development that
involves the filling and/or
excavation of up to 1 acre
of wetlands and/or open
water areas, determine if A,
B, C, or D below a lies:
III(A). Private, non-
-
commercial development, if
$250
100% ($250)
0% ($0)
General Water Quality
Certification No. 4097 (See
attached can be applied:
III(B). Public or commercial
❑
development, if General
$400
100% ($400)
0% ($0)
Water Quality Certification
No. 4097 (See attached)
can be applied:
III(C). If General Water
Quality Certification No.
$400
60% ($240)
40% ($160)
4097 (see attached) could
be applied, but DCM staff
determined that additional
review and written DWQ
concurrence is needed
because of concerns
related to water quality or
life:
III(D). If General Water
Quality Certification No.
$400
60% ($240)
40%($160)
raquatic
4097 (see attached) cannot
be applied:
IV. For development that
[r]
involves the filling and/or
60% ($285)
400%, ($190)
excavation of more than
t$4]75
one acre of wetlands and/or
o en water areas:

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
APPLICATION TRANSMITTAL AND PROCESSING RECORD
APPLICANT: David Chappe[ COUNTY: Carteret
PROJECT NAME:
LOCATION OF PROJECT: 5007 Holly Ln, Morehead City
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED COMPLETE BY FIELD: 2-21-22
FIELD RECOMMENDATION: Attached: Yes To Be Forwarded: Choose an item.
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE: Styron DISTRICT OFFICE: MHC
DISTRICT MANAGER REVIEW: Date
B) DATE RECEIVED BY MAJOR PERMITS UNIT:
APPLICATION ASSIGNED TO: Bodnar
PUBLIC NOTICE REC'D: 3-20-22
ADJ. RIP. PROP NOTICES REC'D:
C) 75 DAY DEADLINE: 2 <h-5I 7.7Z
HOLDS: 4I61-a. -,Id m
EMAIL OUT DATE: 3L33-22- S(L3Izz
PERMIT FINAL ACTION: ISSUE DENY
FEE REC'D: 250 # 5031
END OF NOTICE DATE: 4-9-22
DEED REC'D: Yes
150 DAY DEADLINE:
STATE DUE DATE: Clickgf ia�/Qaima date.
AGENCY
DATE
COMMENTS
RETURNED
OBJECTIONS:
YES NO
NOTES
DCM—Field Rep
DCM — LUP Consistency Determination
(7 �-v
Local Permit Officer
Corps of Engineers — Regulatory Branch
3I %i ZL
4?(5& to ZZ -Off `lo
DWR - 401 Section
yls�Z y
aY'q'S 7 ?o7Z2 -Oyp 57
DWR-Public Water Supply
ZIt$ Lti
Y
DEMLR - Stormwater
DEMLR - Sed and Erosion
DOA -State Property Office
y ZZ
Wildlife Resources Commission
y 9( Lz
DMF - Shellfish Section
(V k-L
1
DMF - Habitat & Enhancement
IZ 7
y�
DNCR - Archives&History
3lS
W
DNCR - Natural Heritage Program
NCDOT
NC Dept of Commerce
- I7
L

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
BRAXTON DAVIS
Director
DATE: March 14, 2022
TO: Gregg Bodnar
THRU: Jonathan Howell
FROM: Heather M. Styron
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Comments and Recommendations - CAMA Major Permit -David Chappell,
Morehead City, Carteret County
The following is my assessment and consequent recommendation's of the above
referenced proposal: This proposal involves the relocation of the existing wet slip
and tie pilings from the west side to the east side of the existing pier as well as the
addition of one slip with boatlift and finger piers to the existing 2 slip docking
facility within Bogue Sound in Morehead City, Carteret County. The development
conforms to the guidelines set forth under 15A NCAC 07H .0208. The waters of
Bogue Sound are open to shellfish harvest and are not designated as a Primary
Nursery Area. Assuming that state and federal agencies concur with the proposal,
the District recommends the project be authorized as proposed, contingent upon the
following conditions:
• All development shall be constructed as shown on plats accepted as complete by DCM on
2/21/2022.
• No more than a total of 3 slips shall be authorized. Note: The proposed wet slip relocation
and third slip addition is outside of the NCDMF 2008 SAV delineations per the Google
Earth Spatial data.
• The proposed wet slip and tie piling relocation as well as the proposed third slip, boatlift
and finger piers shall be limited to a maximum distance of 295' waterward of the existing
bulkhead (NHW) and shall maintain a minimum of 15' from riparian access lines.
• No high ground development is authorized.
4® E
oeomcomia,rnmami.naiowna
North Carolina, Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Coastal Management
Morehead City Office 1 400 Commerce Avenue I Moorehead City, North Carolina 28557
252.808,2808

ROYCOOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. B1SER
Secretary
BRAXTON DAVIS
Director
March 15, 2022
MEMORANDUM:
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
FROM: Gregg Bodnar, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
NCDEO - Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave., Morehead City, NC 28557
252-515-5416 (Courier,04=16-33)
gregg. bodnar@ncdenr.00v
SUBJECT: CAMA Major Pennit Application Review
Applicant: David Chappel
Project Location: 6007 Holly Ln, Morehead City, Carteret County
Proposed Project: Install new docks and boat lift
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
return this form to Greao Bodnar at the address.above by April 12, 202Z If you have any
questions regarding the proposed project, contact Heather Styron [phone] when appropriate, in-
depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
"Additional comments may be attached"
X This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
PRINT NAME Lee Padrick
AGENCY NC Commerce
SIGNATUREKl
DATE
3-16-22
72
- -t
j a ' D
MAR 1 6 2022
NIP SECTION NgHD
D North Carolina Department ofEnvironmental Quality I Division of Coastal Management
Morehead City Office 140o Commerce Avenue I Moorehead Clty,North CoroIma28557
2525155400

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
BRAXTONDAVIS
Director
March 15, 2022
MEMORANDUM:
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
FROM: Gregg Bodnar, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
NCDEQ - Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave., Morehead City, NC 28557
252-515-5416 (Courier 04-16733)
gregg. bodnar(aiincdenr. gov
SUBJECT: CAMA Major Permit Application Review
Applicant: David Chappel
Project Location: 5007 Holly Ln, Morehead City, Carteret County
Proposed Project: Install new docks and boat lift
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
return this form to Gregg Bodnar at the address above by April 1Z 2022. If you have any
questions regarding the proposed project, contact Heather Styron [phone] when appropriate, in-
depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
**Additional comments may be attached**
X This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
PRINT NAME Shannon Myers
AGENCY NCDMF- Shellfish Sanitation and Recreational Water Quality
SIGNATURE �! ' � 7eyA4 - for Shannon Jenkins
DATE 3/16/2022 RECEIVED
MAR 1 6 2022
NIP SECTION VNI mD
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Coastal Management
Morehead City Office 1 400 Commerce Avenue I Moorehead City, North Carolina 26557
252515.5400

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
BRAXTON DAVIS
Director
March 15, 2022
MEMORANDUM:
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
FROM: Gregg Bodnar, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
NCDEQ - Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave., Morehead City, NC 28557
252-515-5416 (Courier 04-16-33)
areoo.bodnar(a ncdenr.00v
SUBJECT: CAMA Major Permit Application Review
Applicant: David Chappel
Project Location: 5007 Holly Ln, Morehead City, Carteret County
Proposed Project: Install new docks and boat lift
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
return this form to Greqq Bodnar at the address above by April 1 Z 2022. If you have any
questions regarding the proposed project, contact Heather Styron [phone] when appropriate, in-
depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: x This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
"Additional comments may be attached"
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
PRINT NAME Mark Brown
AGENCY Public Water Supply
SIGNATURE fl`?.k 9.
DATE
3/17122
RECEIVED
MAR 1 812022
MP SECTION
DCM - MILD CITY
D Q� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Coastal Management
Morehead City Office 1 400 Commerce Avenue I Moorehead City, North Carolina 28557
252.5155400

0 Received: 03/16/2022
State Historic Preservation Office
ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
BRAXTON DAVIS
Director
March 15, 2022
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
ER 22-0940 Due: 3/24/2022
FROM: Gregg Bodnar, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
NCDEQ - Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave., Morehead City, NC 28557
252-515-5416 (Courfer0416U33),
gregg.bodnar0mcdenr.gov
SUBJECT: CAMA Major Permit Application Review
Applicant: David Chappel
Project Location: 5007 Holly Ln, Morehead City, Carteret County
Proposed Project: Install new docks and boat lift
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
return this form to Gregg Bodnar at the address above by Ap111 1Z 2022. If you have any
questions regarding the proposed project, contact Heather Styron [phone] when appropriate, in-
depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
**Additional comments may be attached**
X This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
PRINT NAME Renee Gledhill -Earley
AGENCY State Historic Preservation Office
SIGNATURE
DATE
March 24, 2022
W,-EQ�
o.,wm.mmer�
�m�woiwi� /''�
MAR 2 4 2022
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Coastal Management
Morehead City Office 1 400 Commerce. Avenue I Moorehead City, North Carolina 28557
252515.9400

Bodnar, Gregg
From: Hair, Sarah E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2022 5:10 PM
To: Bodnar, Gregg; Perry, John M
Subject: [External] RE: New CAMA Major Permit Application - Chappel
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Hey Gregg,
This project is being processed as a GP 56, Corps Action ID: SAW-2022-00663
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Liz
From: Cannon, Amanda J <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 4:08 PM
To: Love-Adrick, Rachel A <[e-mail]>, Hair, Sarah E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
<[e-mail]>; Padrick, Lee <[e-mail]>; DCR - Environmental —Review
<[e-mail]>; Cox, Heidi <[e-mail]>; Harding, Kimberlee k
<[e-mail]>; Harrison, James A <[e-mail]>; Harris, David B
<[e-mail]>; Jenkins, Shannon <[e-mail]>; Gupton, Sharon
<[e-mail]>; Walton, Tim <[e-mail]>; Moser, Mike <[e-mail]>;
Hilliard, Wanda <[e-mail]>; Montalvo, Sheri A <[e-mail]>; Sullivan, Shelton
<[e-mail]>; Sams, Dan <[e-mail]>; Hall, Christine <[e-mail]>;
Snider, Holley <[e-mail]>; Perry, John M <[e-mail]>; Dunn, Maria T.
<[e-mail]>; Butler, Rodney A <Rodney. [e-mail]>
Cc: Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail]>; Styron, Heather M. <[e-mail]>; Howell, Jonathan
<jon atha n. howe I I @ ncde n r.gov>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] New CAMA Major Permit Application - Chappel
Hello All!
Please accept this correspondence as the official distribution of CAMA Major Permit Application from David Chappel, in
Morehead City, Carteret County.
Attachments include: Field Investigative Report, work plans, comment sheet, and any other documents intended for you.
NOTE: Please complete the bottom portion of the comment sheet with your information and signature.
*RETURN TO GREGG BODNAR at Qreee.bodnar(a",ncdenr.gov*
NO oversized work plans have been submitted by the applicant
For questions or concerns, please contact Gregg Bodnar at grege.bodnar a�ncdennizov or [phone]
Thank you!
Please note new office number: 252-515-5406

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
RICHARD E. ROGERS, JR.
Director
DATE: April 6, 2022
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
FROM: John Perry
NCDEQ-Division Water Resources
401 Buffer Permitting Branch
SUBJECT: DWR#20220409
No Written Approval Required
PROJECT LOCATION: 5007 Holly Lane, Morehead City, Carteret County
Chappel Property
PROPOSED PROJECT: Expansion of an existing docking facility to provide dockage for three (3) vessels.
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) has received a copy of your CAMA Major permit request
dated February 21, 2022 and received by this office on March 15, 2022. The proposed project
would consist of the relocation of the wets lip and tie pilings to the east side of the pier. The
Proposed project also plans an addition of a finger pier and a boat lift to bring the total slips to
three.
In accordance with the attached General Certification #4497 (GC 4497) the impacts described in
Your application do not require written authorization to utilize GC 4497. However, you are required
to follow the conditions listed in the attached certification.
You should also obtain and comply with any other federal, state and local requirements including
(but not limited to erosion and sedimentation control regulations and state stormwater
requirements before you proceed with your project). Also, the approval to proceed with your
Proposed impacts to waters a depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404
or LAMA Permit.
This Certification can be contested as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of General Statute 15013 by filing
a written petition for an administrative hearing to the Office of Administrative Hearings (hereby
known as OAH). A petition form may be obtained from the OAH at htti2://www.ncoah.com/ or by
calling the OAH Clerk's Office at [phone] for information.
RECETV 2D
APR g Ip
�p MPS
��cri�� � �
^^n[^" u North Caroli D DI El, eWdMngton, Novtal Q Iitlry I Division of Water Resources
12'/ Cardinal Dnve Ext. Wil�ngtoq Nonh Carolive 28r05-5406
910.796.7215

From:
To: Bodnar. Greco
Subject: RE: New LAMA Major Permit Application - Chappell
Date: Wednesday, May 4, 2022 8:15:23 PM
Attachments: 0maoe001. Dna
Thanks Gregg. The change does not affect NCWRC's previous "no comment" response. Thank you.
Maria T. Dunn
Coastal Coordinator
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
943 Washington Sq. Mall
Washington, NC 27889
office: 252-948-3916
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2022 1:25 PM
To: Cannon, Amanda J <[e-mail]>; Love-Adrick, Rachel A <rachel.love-
[e-mail]>; Liz Hair <[e-mail]>; Padrick, Lee
<[e-mail]>; DCR - Environmental_ Review <Environmental. Review@ ncdcr.gov>;
Cox, Heidi <[e-mail]>; Harding, Kimberlee k<[e-mail]>;
Harrison, James A <[e-mail]>; Harris, David 8 <[e-mail]>; Jenkins,
Shannon <[e-mail]>; Gupton, Sharon <[e-mail]>; Walton,
Tim <[e-mail]>; Moser, Mike <[e-mail]>; Hilliard, Wanda
<[e-mail]>; Montalvo, Sheri A <[e-mail]>; Sullivan, Shelton
<[e-mail]>; Sams, Dan <[e-mail]>; Hall, Christine
<[e-mail]>; Snider, Holley <[e-mail]>; Perry, John M
<[e-mail]>; Dunn, Maria T. <[e-mail]>; Butler, Rodney A
<Rod ney. Butler@ ncdcr.gov>
Cc: Styron, Heather M. <[e-mail]>; Howell, Jonathan
<jonathan.howell@ ncdenr.gov>
Subject: RE: New CAMA Major Permit Application - Chappel
Afternoon all,
Please see above for an updated page 3 of 4 clarifying the riparian neighbor structures. The project
has not changed in scope and scale, only clarifying the adjacent structure.
Gregg

Gregg Bodnar
Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
Department of Environmental Quality
[phone] (NEW OFFICE NUMBER)
Gregg.Bodna r(M ncden neov
Find a Field Rep (arcgis.com)
Email Correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Cannon, Amanda J <Amanda Cannon a(Dncdenr.g-ov>
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 4:08 PM
To: Love-Adrick, Rachel A <rachel.love-adrick(c)ncdenr.gov>; Liz Hair <sarah.e. hair @usace.army.mil>;
Padrick, Lee <lpadrick a()nccommerce.com>; DCR - Environmental —Review
<Environmental.Review anncdcr.gov>; Cox, Heidi <heidi.cox @ncdenr.gov>; Harding, Kimberlee k
<Kimberlee.Harding(cDncdenr.gov>; Harrison, James A <James.Ha rrisonP ncden r.gov>; Harris, David
B <davidharris(cDncdot.gov>; Jenkins, Shannon <shannon.jenkins(ancdenr.gov>; Gupton, Sharon
<sharon.gupton(ancdenr.gov>; Walton, Tim <tim.walton(@doa.nc.gov>; Moser, Mike
<mike.moser(d)doa.nc.gov>; Hilliard, Wanda <wanda.hilliard(@doa.nc.gov>; Montalvo, Sheri A
<sheri.montalvo(@ncdenr.gov>; Sullivan, Shelton <shelton sullivan(@ncdenr.gov>; Sams, Dan
<dan.sams @ncdenr.gov>; Hall, Christine <Christine.Hall(@ncdenr.gov>; Snider, Holley
<holley.sniderPncderir.gov>; Perry, John M <John Perry(CDncdenr.gov>; Dunn, Maria T.
<maria.dunn(d)ncwildlife.org>; Butler, Rodney A <Rodney. Butler(@ ncdcr.Rov>
Cc: Bodnar, Gregg <gregg bodnar aPncdenr.gov>; Styron, Heather M.
<heather.m.styron(ancdenr.gov>; Howell, Jonathan <ionathan.howell(ancdenr.gov>
Subject: New CAMA Major Permit Application - Chappel
Hello All!
Please accept this correspondence as the official distribution of CAMA Major Permit Application
from David Chappel, in Morehead City, Carteret County.
Attachments include: Field Investigative Report, work plans, comment sheet, and any other
documents intended for you.
NOTE Please complete the bottom pofhecommentheetwrthyrooumfomatidn
and signature'
*EtETURNvTO GREGG BODNAR at greee tiodnarr7ncdenr:eov*
NO oversized work plans have been submitted by the applicant
For questions or concerns, please contact Gregg Bodnar at g- regg.bodnargncdenr.=gou or (252) 515-
5416
Thank you!

I20Y COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
BPAXTON DAVIS
Dlreuor
March 15, 2022
MEMORANDUM:
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
FROM: Gregg Bodnar; Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
NCDEQ - Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave., Morehead City NC 28557
252-515-5416 (Cou4er 64-16-33),
arena: bodnar(aZ ncde nr. goy,
SUBJECT: CAMA Major Permit Application Review
Applicant: David Chappell
Project, Location: 5007 Holly in, Morehead City, Carteret County
Proposed Project: Install new docks and boat lift
Please indicate below your agencys position or viewpoint on the proposed, project and
return this form to Grego Bodnar at the address above by April 1 Z 2022. If you have any
questions regarding the proposed project, contact Heather Styron [phone] when appropriate, in-
depth comments with supporting data is requested.
This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
"Additional comments may be attached"
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the, project only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments,
PRINT NAME N 1c u; 1.7y n n
AGENCY QC
SIGNATURE
DATE
E�
4un�wrt„ro\
A P H g 2022
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality i. Divlslan of Coastal Managvment
Morehead City Office 1400 Commerce. Avenue I Moorehead City. North Carolina 28557
252S15.5400

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
BRAXTON DAVIS
Director
March 15, 2022
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
FROM: Gregg Bodnar, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
NCDEQ - Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave., Morehead City, NC 28557
252-515-5416 (Couder04-I&M)
areas. bodnar(Mricderin gov
SUBJECT: CA MA Major Permit Application Review
Applicant: David Chappel
Project Location: 5007 Holly Ln, Morehead City, Carteret County
Proposed Project: Install new docks and Croat lift
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
refurrr this form to Gregg Bodnar at the address above by Ap►il 12, 2022. If you have any
questions regarding the proposed project, contact Heather Styron [phone] when appropriate, in-
depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
"Additional comments may be attached"
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments. i prop o s.-d
PRINT NAME 'd't P11"Ild .Z
AGENCY �� P
SIGNATURE Wol^&LP "TAwwwo"
DATE tJ 46et4 n ` 2 0'1 1
ex;rmruarziD E Q��
ECEIVEED
APR g 2022
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Coastal Management
Morehead City Office 1 400 Commerce Avenue I Moorehead City, North Carolina 28557
252.5155400

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
BRAXTON DAVIS
Director
March 22, 2022
FROM:
SUBJECT:
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
Gregg Bodnar, Assistant Major Permits CI
NCDEQ - DMsion of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave., Morehead City, NC 2
252-515-5416 (Courfer04-1&33) /
areoo.bodn rO-)ncdenr.aov
FAMA Major Permit Application Revjgw
Applicant: Be amin Anderson
Project Location: 1403 ve Ct, Morehead Cl , Carteret County
Proposed Project: New doe . g facility & S a wall
Please indicate below your agency positio r viewpoint on the proposed project and
return this form to Grei a Bodnarat th ad �j ess shove by April 19, 202Z If you have any
questions regarding the proposed project, t�tact Heather Styron [phone] when appropriate, in-
depth comments with supporting data is re9kested.
REPLY: This agency ha no ob coon to the project as proposed.
'*Additional c ments y be attached"'
Y This agency as no comm t on the proposed project.
This agenc approves of the roject only If the recommended changes
are incor rated. See attach
This ag cy objects to the proje for reasons described in the attached
comm ts. - rW o 3l: p s -a p d red
PRINT NAME ; 1 GeV- It
AGENCY
SIGNATURE r
DATE ef..to ALA
W North Carolina Department ofEnvironmemalQuality I DlvisionofCoastal Management
Morehead City Office 1 400 Commerce Avenue I Moorehead City, North Carolina 28557
awa.aarw.m.wiaumQ /^� 252SISS400

ROY COOPER
Covernor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
BRAXTON DAVIS
Director
March 15, 2022
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
FROM: Gregg Bodnar, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
NCDEQ - Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave., Morehead City, NC 28557
252-515-5416 (Courier 04-16-33)
gregg. bodnar(5ncdenr.gov
SUBJECT: CAMA Major Permit Application Review
Applicant: David Chappel
Project Location: 5007 Holly Ln, Morehead City, Carteret County
Proposed Project: Install new docks and boat lift
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
return this form to Gregg Bodnar at the address above by April 12, 202Z If you have any
questions regarding the proposed project, contact Heather Styron [phone] when appropriate, in-
depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: x This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
**Additional comments may be attached**
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
PRINT NAME Rachel Love-Adrick
AGENCY rM1Q4(X.Di�visiio)n��of Coastal Management
�- SIGNATURE
DATE
4/1212022
APR 1 2 2022
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Coastal Management
Morehead City Office . 1400 Commerce Avenue I Moorehead City, North Carolina 28557
ercwm carouw.
aa.memmu.wo�mi w.on 252Si55400

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
BRAXTON DAVIS
Director
MEMORANDUM
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
TO: Gregg Bodnar, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
FROM: Rachel Love-Adrick, District Planne l�
Division of Coastal Manageff TL �
SUBJECT: Major Permit Request by David Chappell c/o Andre Webb
DATE: April 12, 2022
Consistency Determination: The request is consistent with/not in conflict with the Town of'Morehead
City Land Use Plan certified by the CRC on September 28, 2007.
Overview: The project is located at 5007 Holly Lane, Morehead City, Carteret County. The site is along
the north side of Bogue Sound. The site is .54 acres (23,609sf) in its entirety and is 4' above NHW. Existing
development includes a single-family residence with driveway, bulkhead and existing two slip docking
facility. The applicant is proposing to relocate the existing wet -slip and tie pilings that are currently along
the west side of the pierto the east side of the pier. They are also proposingto add a third slip with boatlift
and two finger piers to the existing two slip docking facility.
Areas of Environmental Concern (AEC) in the project area include Trust Areas (PTA). Bogue Sound is
classified as SA/HQW, is not a Primary Nursery Area, and is open to shellfishing. According to the 2008 NC
DMF SA V delineations via google earth special data, there is sparse SAV along the landward section of
the pier but no SAV within the existing and proposed slip areas. There is no dredging proposed within
navigable waters. There are no coastal wetlands and no known historic or archaeological areas of value
within the project site.
Anticipated impacts: The development would shade 432 sf and incorporate 656 sf of shallow bottom
habitat. The proposed slip relocation and third slip addition would not interfere with navigation, would
meet the Ya width rule and not extend into the channel portion of Bogue Sound. There would be no
impacts to wetlands, shellfish or SAV resources.
Basis for Determination: The project site is in the Town of Morehead City and is subject to the 2007
Town of Morehead City Core Land Use Plan Update. The Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designates the
site as "Low Density Residential" and "Conservation/Open Space' (due to the sites location in Coastal
Wetlands, Estuarine Waters and Public Trust Area AECs). R- VE®
APR 1 2 2022
D_E Q North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Coastal Management
Morehead City Office 1 400 Commerce Avenue I Morehead �p rt yA
252515.5400 6 z d P CTIO N� d- 4

The following LUP policies may be applicable to this request:
4.2.6 Areas of Environmental Concern
Policy 1, pg. 94: The Town of Morehead City supports state and federal law regarding land use and
development in AECs.
Policy 5, pg. 94: Morehead City supports the use standards for estuarine and public trust areas as
specified in 15A NCAC.0207.
�
ME , E
APR 1 2 2022
Fi YP S1ECT�0 H Prj1,f
�DF North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Coastal Management
Morehead City Office 1400 Commerce Avenue I Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
oro.mwm iommmnwwoveub 252.515.5400

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
BRAXTON DAVIS
Director
March 15, 2022
MEMORANDUM:
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
FROM: Gregg Bodnar, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
NCDEQ - Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave., Morehead City, NC 28557
252-515-54167C9 u ierb41,§-iii
arecc.bodnarAncdenr.gov
SUBJECT: CA MA Major Permit Application Review
Applicant: David Chappel
Project Location: 5007 Holly Ln, Morehead City, Carteret County
Proposed Project: install new docks and boat lift
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
return this form to Greaa Bodnar at the address above by April 1Z 202Z If you have any
questions regarding the proposed project, contact Heather Styron [phone] when appropriate, in-
depth comments with supporting data is requested.
This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
"Additional comments may be attached"
X This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
PRINT NAME James Harrison
AGENCY
NCDMF
SIGNATURE �AGN2if KGWi"GfrUi1i
DATE 11 April 2022
DEQ��
om.nA�m a u. ia�swi mmi�
APR 1 1 2022
MP SECTION MHD
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Coastal Management
Morehead City Office 1 400 Commerce Avenue 1Moorehead City, North Carolina 28557
252.515.5400

Bodnar, Gregg
From: Styron, Heather M.
Sent: Monday, May 9, 2022 8:35 AM
To: Bodnar, Gregg
Subject: FW: [External] Photo with Riparian parallel to Twisdale pier.
Heather Styron
Field Representative
Division of Coastal Management 400 Commerce Avenue Morehead City, 28557
252.515.5417 (0) 252.725.3903 (M)
Heather. M.Stvron(M ncdenr.eov
www.dea.nc.Rov
Find a Field Rep (arcgis.com)
From: Lawrence Twisdale [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2022 4:50 PM
To: Styron, Heather M. <heather. m.styron @ ncdenr.gov>
Subject: [External] Photo with Riparian parallel to Twisdale pier.
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to Report Spam <mailto:[e-mail]>

TA

Bodnar, Gregg
From: Styron, Heather M. fe
Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2022 11:05 AM
To: Lawrence Twisdale a V. d
Cc: Howell, Jonathan; Bodnar, Gregg n� �'�fA77✓/
Subject: RE: [External] David Chappel, nieghbor riparian form T
Good Morning Mr. Twisdale,
I have asked the admin staff to mail you a scaled copy of the newest drawing and hopefully they will do this soon. The
major permit supervisor Mr. Jonathan Howell who is also the acting District Manager, has approved the riparian line
location shown on the most recent revised drawing that was sent to you via email on May 2, 2022. Typically on
shorelines void of existing piers you are correct in that the riparian lines are drawn from the channel 90 degrees to
where they intersect normal high water. In the case where the shoreline has existing piers, DCM has the authority to
determine riparian lines. In this case we determined this was the best alignment for this shoreline due to all of the
existing piers and their current alignments. The proposed riparian line determination as shown on the most recent
revised drawing meets the specific and general conditions of the NC Coastal Resources Commission's rules and the
Coastal Area Management Act. As far as the distance of their proposed project, they are not asking to extend into
Bogue Sound more than what their existing docking facility is currently at, which is approximately 295' to 300' from the
existing bulkhead along their shoreline. Their docking facility is approximately 27' landward of your outer boatlift pilings
and does not extend beyond the landward side of your existing platform. The proposed development would be a
minimum of 15' from the riparian line location that we approved and would be more landward than your outer boatlift
area and therefore you should have reasonable egress and ingress still for your boat. The Coastal Resource Commission
determined that 15' on either side of the riparian lines (30' total) is a reasonable distance for this type of activity. The
application will be taken off hold and will continue through the major permit process. As an objecting party you will be
notified when a permit decision has been reached and will be given the opportunity to appeal any permit decision made.
As far as conditions on the CAMA permit, we always condition a minimum of 15' from riparian lines when a waiver is not
obtained as well as distance, type of development etc. I hope this helps and please feel free to contact myself, Jonathan
Howell ( Major permit supervisor) or Mr. Gregg Bodnar ( Assistant Major Permits Coordinator) with any questions.
Best Regards,
Heather
Heather Styron
Field Representative
Division of Coastal Management 400 Commerce Avenue Morehead City, 28557
252.515.5417 (0) 252.725.3903 (M)
Heather. [e-mail]
www.deq.nc.gov
Find a Field Rep (arcgis.com)
-----Original Message -----
From: Lawrence Twisdale [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2022 4:49 PM
To: Styron, Heather M. <heather. m.styron @ ncden r.gov>
Subject: Re: [External] David Chappel, nieghbor riparian form

CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to Report Spam.<mailto:[e-mail]>
Heather, can you mail me the drawing since the last time I tried to print out and use a scale, the drawing appeared to
have errors. Getting a copy of the file drawing would help me clarify our objections.
1. In looking over the attached drawing, my question is how is the riparian line drawn between 2 landowners with
existing piers that are not parallel, but generally perpendicular to the water channel? The Riparian Line seems to be
drawn parallel to Chappel's pier. If drawn from the property line point parallel to my pier, the proposed project appears
to violate the 15 ft setback by about 5-7 ft? This intrusion will clearly impact our ability to get a boat safely in to our day
dock. A fair drawing would be making the riparian line the average of the directions of my pier and his pier. His pier is
slanted toward my pier. This would suggest that his addition should not come out as far as indicated in the sketch. I am
surprised that CAMA does not see this. Is there a legal precedent on this situation. If so, please provide. NOTE: I drew a
riparian line drawn parallel to my pier and its associated 15 ft setback. This line shows that the proposed boat lift
violates the 15 ft setback by about 5-7 ft. I will send a photo of that sketch by separate email.
2. As I requested before, we need a distance limitation on how far he can build out his pier. That distance should be
noted on the permit. CAMA should be fair about the determination of the riparian line in cases like this with existing
docks. A few feet matters in this case since it affects the safe and rightful use of our pier and day dock, which is directly
opposite the proposed boat lift.
3. We object to intrusion into the 15 ft setback of a fairly drawn Riparian Line.
I you can't mail me a proper copy of the drawing, can I come by your office to pick one up.
Thank you for considering our emails and request to get a proper and fair Riparian determination
> On May 2, 2022, at 1:40 PM, Styron, Heather M. <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Hello Mr. Twisdale,
> I have attached the corrected drawing sent by Mr. Chappell's agent for your review and as notification. Please look this
over and if you have any objections to this revised plat please send them in writing to me. This office is now satisfied
with the corrected drawing and will be proceeding with the major permit process.
> Best Regards,
> Heather
> Heather Styron
> Field Representative
> Division of Coastal Management 400 Commerce Avenue Morehead City, 28557
> 252.515.5417 (0) 252.725.3903 (M)
> [e-mail]
> www.deq.nc.gov
> Find a Field Rep (arcgis.com)

> -----Original Message-----
• From: Lawrence Twisdale [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2022 11:24 AM
> To: Styron, Heather M. <[e-mail]>
> Subject: Re: [External] David Chappel, nieghbor riparian form
> CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to Report Spam.<mailto: repo rt.spam @ nc.gov>
> Heather, can you call today. There is some confusion with Andre and I talked to David Chappel. Were you able to pass
on the info to the agent?
> Again, I think it is a very tight space and if one draws the riparian line as an average of the alignments of his dock and
my dock, then I think he has only 17 ft to do the work. If they build a 15 foot wide boat lift, like they are indicating and
allow for the walkway of 6 ft (including pile diameters and some spacing, they will be at 21-22 ft, encroaching the
riparian offset.
> We request a professionally developed drawing that shows how far he can extend from his current boat lift. That
drawing should indicate how far out he can extend from his current pilings and maintain the15 ft offset.
> We do not grant the right for him to extend into the 15 ft offset.
> This can easily be settled with a professionally developed drawing and a fair riparian line (average of the headings of
our piers).
> Does CAMA agree with this approach.
> Thanks
>> On Apr 20, 2022, at 8:10 AM, Styron, Heather M. <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> Hello Mr. Twisdale,
>> I am in the field this morning but will give you a call when I get back in the office.
>> Thanks,
>> Heather
>> Heather Styron
>> Field Representative
>> Division of Coastal Management 400 Commerce Avenue Morehead City, 28557
>> 252.515.5417 (0) 252.725.3903 (M)
>> [e-mail]
>> www.deq.nc.gov
>> Find a Field Rep (arcgis.com)
>> -----Original Message -----
>> From: Lawrence Twisdale [mailto:[e-mail]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2022 3:36 PM
>> To: Styron, Heather M. <[e-mail]>

>> Subject: Re: [External] David Chappel, nieghbor riparian form
>> CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to Report Spam.<mailto:[e-mail]>
>> I would like to talk to you just to understand the process. If there is a dispute, for example, on how the riparian line is
drawn by one party, how is that settled? Does CAMA make a determination of what is fair or best. What are my options
if we don't agree? Have you had cases like this.
The drawings he has produced at not accurate. I am not sure a redraw will overcome that and I don't see how he gets
to determine the direction of the riparian line.
>> I believe the end of my pier is about 20-25 ft west of a properly drawn riparian line. It depends on how the line is
drawn. The more normal you draw the line to the waterway heading, then, there is no room at all for a new boatlift west
of his current boatlift.
>> As a another point, The drawings should show the distance in feet from the outside (west)piling of the new proposed
lift to the outside west -most piling of the current lift. That way, if they extend it out beyond the agreed distance into the
riparian offset, then it could be easily measured. It also would help them control the construction.
>> His drawing is so vague and full of errors, I am not sure what to make of this process. He has mainly produced
drawings that show that everything is fine, according to his opinion on the riparian line.
>> Sorry for the length of these emails. Normally this wouldn't matter that much in most cases, but in this case it
matters a lot to us due to the aforementioned emails.
>> Is there someone I can talk to about the LAMA process for situations like this. THANK you for your time and sorry to
be such a pain.
>>> On Apr 18, 2022, at 11:38 AM, Styron, Heather M. <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> Hello Mr. Twisdale,
>>> We have received your concerns and objections and are looking into this matter. I am in the process of discussing
this with the agent for this project. We are more than likely going to require him to re -notify you as well as the other
neighbor with a corrected drawing.
>>> Heather
>>> Heather Styron
>>> Field Representative
>>> Division of Coastal Management 400 Commerce Avenue Morehead City, 28557
>>> 252.515.5417 (0) 252.725.3903 (M)
>>> [e-mail]
>>> www.deq.nc.gov
>>> Find a Field Rep (arcgis.com)
>>> ----- Original Message-----

>>> From: Lawrence Twisdale [mailto:[e-mail]]
>>> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 11:15 AM
>>> To: Styron, Heather M. <[e-mail]>
>>> Subject: [External] David Chappel, nieghbor riparian form
>>> CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to Report Spam.<mailto:[e-mail]>
>>> Heather, I called and left a long message on your office phone. I have received a riparian form from my neighbor's
agent, Andre Webb.
>>> There seem to be several mistakes on his sketch. The riparian line is not drawn correctly, and it does not show that
my main boat lift runs parallel to the intracoastal. If the riparian line is drawn correctly, I don't think there is room for a
pair walkway and a boat lift without getting into the 15 ft offset.
>>> Hence, I object to this and we need a highly accurate riparian line. Does the riparian line start at the mean high
water mark, which is on his bulkehead.
>>> I also do not wish to waive the 15 ft setback, since it will make my main boatlift difficult to use since by the time I
back out a 24 ft boat I may hit his boat/boatlift in the prevailing SW winds.
>>> My cell number is 919-624-2687.
> <David Chappel REVISION2 (00000002).pdf>

From
To: Lawrence Iwlsaale
Cc: Bodnar. Greao
Subject: RE: [External] David Chappel, nieghbor riparian form
Date: Monday, May 2, 2022 1:40:12 PM
Attachments: David Chappel REVISION2 f000000021.odf
Hello Mr. Twisdale,
I have attached the corrected drawing sent by Mr. Chappell's agent for your review and as notification. Please look
this over and if you have any objections to this revised plat please send them in writing to me. This office is now
satisfied with the corrected drawing and will be proceeding with the major permit process.
Best Regards,
Heather
Heather Styron
Field Representative
Division of Coastal Management 400 Commerce Avenue Morehead City, 28557
252.515.5417 (0) 252.725.3903 (M)
[e-mail]
www.deq.nc.gov
Find a Field Rep (arcgis.com)
-----Original Message -----
From: Lawrence Twisdale [mailto:latwisdalc&icloud.com]
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2022 11:24 AM
To: Styron, Heather M. <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [External] David Chappel, nieghbor riparian forth
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as
an attachment to Report Spam <mailto:repn_rt-snamQnoTov>
Heather, can you call today. There is some confusion with Andre and I talked to David Chappel. Were you able to
pass on the info to the agent?
Again, I think it is a very tight space and if one draws the riparian line as an average of the alignments of his dock
and my dock, then I think he has only 17 ft to do the work. If they build a 15 foot wide boat lift, like they are
indicating and allow for the walkway of 6 ft (including pile diameters and some spacing, they will be at 21-22 ft,
encroaching the riparian offset.
We request a professionally developed drawing that shows how far he can extend from his current boat lift. That
drawing should indicate how far out he can extend from his current pilings and maintain thel5 ft offset.
We do not grant the right for him to extend into the 15 It offset.
This can easily be settled with a professionally developed drawing and a fair riparian line (average of the headings
of our piers).
Does CAMA agree with this approach.
Thanks

> On Apr 20, 2022, at 8:10 AM, Styron, Heather M. <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Hello Mr. Twisdale,
> I am in the field this morning but will give you a call when I get back in the office.
> Thanks,
> Heather
> Heather Styron
> Field Representative
> Division of Coastal Management 400 Commerce Avenue Morehead City, 28557
> 252.515.5417 (0) 252.725.3903 (M)
> [e-mail]
> www.deq.nc.gov
> Find a Field Rep (arcgis.com)
> -----Original Message-----
• From: Lawrence Twisdale rmailto:latwisdalenicload.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2022 3:36 PM
> To: Styron, Heather M. <[e-mail]>
> Subject: Re: [External] David Chappel, nieghbor riparian form
> CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as
an attachment to Report Spam <mailto:[e-mail]>
> I would like to talk to you just to understand the process. If there is a dispute, for example, on how the riparian
line is drawn by one party, how is that settled? Does CAMA make a determination of what is fair or best. What are
my options if we don't agree? Have you had cases like this.
> The drawings he has produced at not accurate. I am not sure a redraw will overcome that and I don't see how he
gets to determine the direction of the riparian line.
> I believe the end of my pier is about 20-25 ft west of a properly drawn riparian line. It depends on how the line is
drawn. The more normal you draw the line to the waterway heading, then, there is no room at all for a new boatlift
west of his current boatlift.
> As a another point, The drawings should show the distance in feet from the outside (west)piling of the new
proposed lift to the outside west -most piling of the current lift. That way, if they extend it out beyond the agreed
distance into the riparian offset, then it could be easily measured. It also would help them control the construction.
> His drawing is so vague and full of errors, I am not sure what to make of this process. He has mainly produced
drawings that show that everything is fine, according to his opinion on the riparian line.
> Sorry for the length of these emails. Normally this wouldn't matter that much in most cases, but in this case it
matters a lot to us due to the aforementioned emails.
> Is there someone I can talk to about the CAMA process for situations like this. THANK you for your time and
sorry to be such a pain.
>> On Apr 18, 2022, at 11:38 AM, Styron, Heather M. <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> Hello Mr. Twisdale,

>> We have received your concerns and objections and are looking into this matter. I am in the process of
discussing this with the agent for this project. We are more than likely going to require him to re -notify you as well
as the other neighbor with a corrected drawing.
>> Heather
>> Heather Styron
>> Field Representative
>> Division of Coastal Management 400 Commerce Avenue Morehead City, 28557
>> 252.515.5417 (0) 252.725.3903 (M)
>> [e-mail]
>> www.deq.ne.gov
>> Find a Field Rep (arcgis.com)
>> -----Original Message -----
>> From: Lawrence Twisdale [mailto:[e-mail]]
>> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 11:15 AM
>> To: Styron, Heather M. <[e-mail]>
>> Subject: [External] David Chappel, nieghbor riparian form
>> CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email
as an attachment to Report Spam <mailto•renort.snamnnc.sov>
>> Heather, I called and left a long message on your office phone. I have received a riparian form from my
neighbor's agent, Andre Webb.
>> There seem to be several mistakes on his sketch. The riparian line is not drawn correctly, and it does not show
that my main boat lift runs parallel to the intracoastal. If the riparian line is drawn correctly, I don't think there is
room for a pair walkway and a boat lift without getting into the 15 ft offset.
>> Hence, I object to this and we need a highly accurate riparian line. Does the riparian line start at the mean high
water mark, which is on his bulkehead.
>> I also do not wish to waive the 15 ft setback, since it will make my main boatlift difficult to use since by the time
I back out a 24 ft boat I may hit his boaUboatlift in the prevailing SW winds.
>> My cell number is 919-624-2687.

w
Bodnar, Gregg
From: Styron, Heather M.
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2022 2:42 PM
To: Bodnar, Gregg
Subject: FW: [External] David Chappel, nieghbor riparian form
Here is the newest one for the file. Do you have the first two he sent? I spoke with him and let him know we are waiting
for a new drawing showing his pier as it is onsite and that we agree with the Riparian lines shown so that would not be
changing. It has seemed to appease his concerns. I did let him know we would send him the corrected drawing and
would contact him about his concerns if the permit was issued so he could appeal a permit decision once we got to that
point.
Heather Styron
Field Representative
Division of Coastal Management 400 Commerce Avenue Morehead City, 28557
252.515.5417 (0) 252.725.3903 (M)
[e-mail]
www.deq.nc.gov
Find a Field Rep (arcgis.com)
-----Original Message -----
From: Lawrence Twisdale [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2022 11:24 AM
To: Styron, Heather M. <heather. m.styron @ ncden r.gov>
Subject: Re: [External] David Chappel, nieghbor riparian form
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to Report Spam.<mailto:[e-mail]>
Heather, can you call today. There is some confusion with Andre and I talked to David Chappel. Were you able to pass
on the info to the agent?
Again, I think it is a very tight space and if one draws the riparian line as an average of the alignments of his dock and
my dock, then I think he has only 17 ft to do the work. If they build a 15 foot wide boat lift, like they are indicating and
allow for the walkway of 6 ft (including pile diameters and some spacing, they will be at 21-22 ft, encroaching the
riparian offset.
We request a professionally developed drawing that shows how far he can extend from his current boat lift. That
drawing should indicate how far out he can extend from his current pilings and maintain the15 ft offset.
We do not grant the right for him to extend into the 15 ft offset.
This can easily be settled with a professionally developed drawing and a fair riparian line (average of the headings of our
piers).
Does CAMA agree with this approach.

Thanks
> On Apr 20, 2022, at 8:10 AM, Styron, Heather M. <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Hello Mr. Twisdale,
> I am in the field this morning but will give you a call when I get back in the office.
> Thanks,
> Heather
> Heather Styron
> Field Representative
> Division of Coastal Management 400 Commerce Avenue Morehead City, 28557
> 252.515.5417 (0) 252.725.3903 (M)
> [e-mail]
> www.deq.nc.gov
> Find a Field Rep (arcgis.com)
> -----Original Message -----
> From: Lawrence Twisdale [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2022 3:36 PM
> To: Styron, Heather M. <[e-mail]>
> Subject: Re: [External] David Chappel, nieghbor riparian form
> CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to Report Spa m.<mailto:[e-mail]>
> I would like to talk to you just to understand the process. If there is a dispute, for example, on how the riparian line is
drawn by one party, how is that settled? Does CAMA make a determination of what is fair or best. What are my options
if we don't agree? Have you had cases like this.
> The drawings he has produced at not accurate. I am not sure a redraw will overcome that and I don't see how he gets
to determine the direction of the riparian line.
> I believe the end of my pier is about 20-25 ft west of a properly drawn riparian line. It depends on how the line is
drawn. The more normal you draw the line to the waterway heading, then, there is no room at all for a new boatlift west
of his current boatlift.
> As a another point, The drawings should show the distance in feet from the outside (west)piling of the new proposed
lift to the outside west -most piling of the current lift. That way, if they extend it out beyond the agreed distance into the
riparian offset, then it could be easily measured. It also would help them control the construction.
> His drawing is so vague and full of errors, I am not sure what to make of this process. He has mainly produced
drawings that show that everything is fine, according to his opinion on the riparian line.
> Sorry for the length of these emails. Normally this wouldn't matter that much in most cases, but in this case it matters
a lot to us due to the aforementioned emails.

> Is there someone I can talk to about the CAMA process for situations like this. THANK you for your time and sorry to
be such a pain.
>> On Apr 18, 2022, at 11:38 AM, Styron, Heather M. <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> Hello Mr. Twisdale,
>> We have received your concerns and objections and are looking into this matter. I am in the process of discussing this
with the agent for this project. We are more than likely going to require him to re -notify you as well as the other
neighbor with a corrected drawing.
>> Heather
>> Heather Styron
>> Field Representative
>> Division of Coastal Management 400 Commerce Avenue Morehead City, 28557
>> 252.515.5417 (0) 252.725.3903 (M)
>> [e-mail]
>> www.deq.nc.gov
>> Find a Field Rep (arcgis.com)
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Lawrence Twisdale [mailto:[e-mail]]
>> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 11:15 AM
>> To: Styron, Heather M. <[e-mail]>
>> Subject: [External] David Chappel, nieghbor riparian form
>> CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to Report Spa m.<mailto:[e-mail]>
>> Heather, I called and left a long message on your office phone. I have received a riparian form from my neighbor's
agent, Andre Webb.
>> There seem to be several mistakes on his sketch. The riparian line is not drawn correctly, and it does not show that
my main boat lift runs parallel to the intracoastal. If the riparian line is drawn correctly, I don't think there is room for a
pair walkway and a boat lift without getting into the 15 ft offset.
>> Hence, I object to this and we need a highly accurate riparian line. Does the riparian line start at the mean high water
mark, which is on his bulkehead.
I also do not wish to waive the 15 ft setback, since it will make my main boatlift difficult to use since by the time I
back out a 24 ft boat I may hit his boat/boatlift in the prevailing SW winds.
>> My cell number is 919-624-2687.

Bodnar, Gregg
From: Styron, Heather M.
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2022 2:07 PM
To: Bodnar, Gregg
Subject: FW: [External] Re: David Chappel, nieghbor riparian NEW FORM from Andre received
3-19-21
FYI
Heather Styron
Field Representative
Division of Coastal Management 400 Commerce Avenue Morehead City, 28557
252.515.5417 (0) 252.725.3903 (M)
[e-mail]
www.deg.nc.gov
Find a Field Rep (arcgis.com)
From: Lawrence Twisdale [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2022 12:40 PM
To: Styron, Heather M. <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] Re: David Chappel, nieghbor riparian NEW FORM from Andre received 3-19-21
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Heather, I received a new drawing yesterday on the Chappel project. I have some issues with his drawing. By
my scaling from the drawing he shows the Chappel lot to be 100 ft wide and I believe it is only 92 ft wide. He
also appeared to start the riparian line off of my bulkhead, and the property line is about 1.5 to 2 ft east of that. I
am not sure he positioned the piers correctly, he shows them to be about 88-90 ft apart, whereas I think it is a
few feet less than that. My pier is also not drawn to how it was built, so we need to check on some of these
basics since that governs the riparian rights of each owner.
The riparian line he drew is not quite parallel to the piers and it is pushed toward my pier. From what I have
seen on google earth the riparian line, if drawn perpendicular to the main waterway should slant the other way,
more easterly.
All this means that I don't believe, without a more professionally developed drawing that the proposed project
can be done without affecting my riparian rights and water access.
The reason this is important to my family is that we would like to be able to safely get our boat out of the
boatlift and a few ft to 10 ft of encroachment is significant.The EW boadift is the one that can lift the new boat
that we now have. Further, we also use the day dock, which is on the east side and parallel to our pier. We pull
the boat in there to load up. The day dock is also where other visitors dock their boats and we occasionally jet
ski from there. Safe access to that area is therefore important to us and we need the riparian offset to be
maintained so that one can enter that area at low speeds when wind and/or current must be considered. Clearly,
if he builds out too far west, it seems to use that this access will be impaired.

Can you give me a call. I'd like to find out how these things are settled. I am simply looking out for my family's
rights to water access within the law. Unfortunately in this case a professional drawing with a proper
determination of the riparian line (does CAMA do this?) may be needed since a lot depends on that.
My son in law sent me a 2004 article, which helped me understand some of the issues (below is an except) and I
have assumed the article is still applicable in NC.
Thank you for your time and I look forward to talking to you.
Yet another significant limitation on the right to wharf out involves the similar right of adjacent property owners.
The rule for determining the corridors in which a riparian owner may build a pier or dock are well settled in North
Carolina. To determine the proper corridor, do not simply extend the side property lines out to the channel. The
correct rule is rather to begin where the side property line reaches the shoreline and then to proceed in a line
perpendicular to the deep water channel outward to the channel."The diagram below from the Division of Coastal
Management"depicts how the riparian corridor is determined. It is of note that CAMA regulations recognize that
the rules shown on the diagram will not be sufficient in all cases. "When shoreline configuration is such that a
perpendicular alignment cannot be achieved, the pier shall be aligned to meet the intent of this Rule to the
maximum extent practicable.s70 This rule is in alignment with caselaw which has long recognized that the right to
build a dock or pier must be restricted so as not to unreasonably "interfere with the correlative rights of other
[riparian] owners.""
6' Capune P. Robbins, 273 N.C. 581, 160 S.E.2d 881 (1968). (In this case the plaintiff had attempted to pass underneath the defendant's pier
on a paddleboard. The defendant threw bottles at the plaintiff, causing bodily injury, and urged him to turn back. Plaintiffs cause of action
for assault was upheld, there being no evidence of any right by the defendant to prohibit plaintiff from passing under the pier).
as 0 Neal v. Rollinson, 212 N.C. 83,192 S.E.2d 688 (1937).
69 See CAMA Handbook for Development in Coastal North Carolina at wwwmccoastalmanagement.net and see O'Neal v. Rollinson, 212
N.C. 83 (1937).
0015A N.C.A.C. 7H.0208(b)(6)(L) (2004).
Pine Knoll Association, Inc. v. Cardon,126 N.C. App.155 (1997) citing Heston v. Ousler,119 N.H. 58 (1979).
Water Rights December 2004 — Page 13 of 17 © Chicago Title Insurance Company

G\ `
l'?0EXAM
NO
'go
N�5 MEAS
4AU� 5
L
1 Asa\\
.....viroxmvux[
ONW �WGN WASEH
The Reasonable Use Doctrine
Under the reasonable use doctrine, all riparian owners have equal rights with respect to the removal and use of
water from the watercourse. 72"A riparian owner has a right to make all the use he can of a stream flowing through
his land so long as he does not pollute it or divert it from its natural channel and abstract so much of the water as to
prevent other people from having equal enjoyment with himself, or does not use the same in such an unreasonable
manner as to materially damage or destroy the rights of other riparian owners."' There are many cases interpreting
reasonableness in regard to the use of waters. A thorough discussion is beyond the scope of this manuscript but the
reader is directed to Webster's §16-7 for a good discussion of the reasonable use doctrine.
On Apr 18, 2022, at 11:14 AM, Lawrence Twisdale <latwisdalegicloud.com> wrote:
Heather, I called and left a long message on your office phone. I have received a riparian form
from my neighbor's agent, Andre Webb.
There seem to be several mistakes on his sketch. The riparian line is not drawn correctly, and it
does not show that my main boat lift runs parallel to the intracoastal. If the riparian line is drawn
correctly, I don't think there is room for a pair walkway and a boat lift without getting into the 15
ft offset.
Hence, I object to this and we need a highly accurate riparian line. Does the riparian line start at
the mean high water mark, which is on his bulkehead.
I also do not wish to waive the 15 ft setback, since it will make my main boatlift difficult to use
since by the time I back out a 24 ft boat I may hit his boat/boatlift in the prevailing SW winds.
My cell number is 919-624-2687.

Bodnar, Gregg
From: Styron, Heather M.
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 3:30 PM
To: Andre Webb
Cc: Bodnar, Gregg
Subject: RE: [External] David Chappel riparian re -alignment
Attachments: 2021 Adjacent Riparian Owner Notice -Waiver Form with Tips_MHC.doc corrected phone
number.doc
Perfect! You will need to send this to both adjacent neighbors either certified mail return receipt or send it and have
them sign the attached riparian forms. Once we receive the new drawing and signed forms, the application will be taken
off of hold.
Heather Styron
Field Representative
Division of Coastal Management 400 Commerce Avenue Morehead City, 28557
252.515.5417 (0) 252.725.3903 (M)
[e-mail]
www.deg.nc.gov
Find a Field Rep (armis.com)
From: Andre Webb [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 3:05 PM
To: Styron, Heather M. <heather. m.styron @ ncden r.gov>
Subject: [External] David Chappel riparian re -alignment
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
Report Spam.
Hey Heather,
As per our discussion I have updated the riparian line. The drawing is attached. Does this look correct?
Thanks
Andre
252-665-4378
to

N.C. DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATIONIWAIVER FORM
CERTIFIED MAIL • RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED or HAND DELIVERY
(fop portion to be completed by owner or their agent)
Name of Property Owner 7APio CNi°PPFL'
Address of Property: ' So07 1401-r-Y LRNE 11AfZ6*-AD CiIY' G USS%
Mailing Address of Owner. SgW4!F As 044evE
Q�Jn)
Owner's email D C I. Q f p7S(v9� hOt'OCwone�rs Phonetk Z577-531- `j7bZ
Agent's Name:
Agent's
AgentPhonetk Z5'Z-665 -`1375
Corsi
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER'S
I hereby certify that 1 own property adjacent to the above referenced property. The individual applying forthis
permit has described to me, as shown on the attached drawing, the development they are proposing. A
description or drawing with dimensions must be provided with this letter.
I DO NOT have objections to this proposal. I DO have objections to this proposal.
if you have objections to what Is being propose% you musr nomy me n.w,. umabmn w uu4b ar
Management (DCM) in writing within 10 days of receipt of this notice Correspondence should be
mailed to 4W commerce Ave., Morehead City, NC 28557. DCMI►epresentatives can also be contacted
at [phone]. No response is considered the same as no objection if you have been notified by
Certified Marl
WANER SECTION
I understand that any proposed pier, dock, mooring pilings, boat ramp, breakwater, boathouse, lift, or
groin must be set back a minimum distance of 15' from my area of riparian access unless waived by me
(this does not apply to bulkheads or riprap revetments). (If you wish to waive the setback, you must sign
the appropriate blank below.)
I DO wish to waive sometall of the 15' setback 15R�
Signature of Adjacent Riparian
no
I do not wish to waive the 15' setback requirement (initial the blank)
Signature of Adjacent Riparian Property owner. ��
TypedlPrinted name of ARI
C
Mailing Address of ARPO:
ARPO's email• ARPO's Phone #: aZ2b
Date. *waiver is id t6i jb r from ARPO's Signature'
�� �
Revised May 2021
MAR 3 1 2022

Bodnar, Gregg
From:
Bodnar, Gregg
Sent:
Monday, April 4, 2022 9:06 AM
To:
[e-mail]
Cc:
Styron, Heather M.
Subject:
Chappell riparian notification
Morning Andre,
The receipt for Mr. Twisdale shows that it has not been delivered yet (per USPS website). If you have additional
information showing that it has been delivered please let me know. Otherwise I will have to place the project on hold
pending delivery and passing of the 30 day review period unless we can get a signed waiver of no objection.
Please let me know ASAP,
Gregg
Gregg Bodnar
Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
Department of Environmental Quality
[phone] (NEW OFFICE NUMBER)
G regg.Bodnar@ ncdenr.gov
Email Correspondence to and from this address is hubject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

__,__ 1 /( �-� ems..-ms�..r�r� �„ �,�,._ ,r,s►"
..1 Q
C3
tO
ru
f1J
ru
NI iv, FA1LrAa
F��
Cer ified Mai M
s _O
No C 1
_xtra 6arvic" a ve" lvMoI bac, ado fin stir �
❑ Retum F%Wpt O doopy)
❑ Return R"pi (electmll($ 9—
El CMltled Mali Restricted Uelly" L
1
❑ Adult signature nequlred
Adult Stgnatum Ratdcted Dobv" L . _
Postage
S
Total Postage
$ I c
Sent To / � i1%)"/��/��[��']C�}'.��/�
Street And!( Tula, N • V V4I� t� �• N••�•••• •NI�III�.�
Z Z CamPi � je7XIAAJ 1%140 MAA 3
Slata,7lA;:46-_ ---------------------- �• NN�r��F�������w�N�

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FOR CAMA PERMIT APPUCATION
Name of Property Owner Requesting Permit: 'p4vjq CNA-17P,(,L
Mailing Address:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
5007 Poccr Gnn/E
mofay-le-,01> C/rr, /Nc- Z�SS7
Zs2 - 53/ - 970Z
1 certify that I have authorized AN-D" Ak&
C C) %`-
to act on my behalf, for the purpose of applying for and obtaining all CAMA permits
necessary for the following proposed development: 3 iy /8 1"u-46C -Poc e
at my property located at Soo? NbCCY G,o^ t� DQ�tuF.a> CITY NG
in 42'T6f-6". County.
1 furthermore certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fad grant permission to
Division of Coastal Management staff, the Local Permit Officer and their agents to enter
on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application. /-7
Property
Signature
��ulr) CNpOPEL
Print or Type Name
Tide
/�=1--2,�
Date
This certification is valid through 6 I / I Zozz
RECEIVED
FEB 04t2022
DCM-MHD CITY

Bodnar, Gregg
From:
Bodnar, Gregg
Sent:
Wednesday, May 4, 2022 1:29 PM
To:
[e-mail]
Cc:
Styron, Heather M.
Subject:
Chappell off hold
Afternoon Andre,
Please accept this as notification that the project has been taken off hold as of today. The adjusted 75 day date is
5/23/22. All comments are in and we are wrapping up notification with Mr. Twisdale. Once that has concluded we
should be able to make a final decision.
Thanks,
G regg
Gregg Bodnar
Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
Department of Environmental Quality
[phone] (NEW OFFICE NUMBER)
G ress. B od n a r@ ncd e n r.eov
Find a Field Rep (armis.com)
Email Correspondence to and from this address is hubject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

}...-.+i
Bodnar, Gregg
From: Bodnar, Gregg
Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2022 1:25 PM
To: Cannon, Amanda J; Love-Adrick, Rachel A, Liz Hair; Padrick, Lee; DCR -
Environmental_Review, Cox, Heidi; Harding, Kimberlee k; Harrison, James A, Harris,
David B; Jenkins, Shannon; Gupton, Sharon; Walton, Tim; Moser, Mike, Hilliard, Wanda;
Montalvo, Sheri A; Sullivan, Shelton; Sams, Dan; Hall, Christine; Snider, Holley; Perry,
John M; Dunn, Maria T.; Butler, Rodney A
Cc: Styron, Heather M.; Howell, Jonathan
Subject: RE: New CAMA Major Permit Application - Chappel
Attachments: David Chappel REVISION2.pdf
Afternoon all,
Please see above for an updated page 3 of 4 clarifying the riparian neighbor structures. The project has not changed in
scope and scale, only clarifying the adjacent structure.
Gregg
Gregg Bodnar
Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
Department of Environmental Quality
[phone] (NEW OFFICE NUMBER)
G rese. Bodna r@ ncdenr.gov
Find a Field Rep (arcgis.com)
Email Correspondence to and from this address is hubject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Cannon, Amanda J <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 4:08 PM
To: Love-Adrick, Rachel A <[e-mail]>; Liz Hair <[e-mail]>; Padrick, Lee
<][e-mail]>; DCR - Environmental_ Review <[e-mail]>; Cox, Heidi
<[e-mail]>; Harding, Kimberlee k <[e-mail]>; Harrison, James A
<[e-mail]>; Harris, David B <[e-mail]>; Jenkins, Shannon
<[e-mail]>; Gupton, Sharon <[e-mail]>; Walton, Tim
<[e-mail]>; Moser, Mike <[e-mail]>; Hilliard, Wanda <[e-mail]>;
Montalvo, Sheri A <[e-mail]>; Sullivan, Shelton <[e-mail]>; Sams, Dan
<[e-mail]>; Hall, Christine <[e-mail]>; Snider, Holley <[e-mail]>,
Perry, John M <[e-mail]>; Dunn, Maria T. <[e-mail]>; Butler, Rodney A
<Rod ney. [e-mail]>
Cc: Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail]>; Styron, Heather M. <[e-mail]>; Howell, Jonathan
<jonatha n. howell@ ncden r.gov>
Subject: New CAMA Major Permit Application - Chappel
Hello All!

le
_i
Please accept this correspondence as the official distribution of CAMA Major Permit Application from David Chappel, in
Morehead City, Carteret County.
Attachments include: Field Investigative Report, work plans, comment sheet, and any other documents intended for you.
NOTE Please complete the bottom portion of the comment sheet with your information and signature:
*RETURN TO GREGG BODNAR at gregg.bodnar(a)ncdenr.gov*,
NO oversized work plans have been submitted by the applicant
For questions or concerns, please contact Gregg Bodnar at [e-mail] or [phone]
Thank you!
Please note new office number: 252-515-5406
Amanda Cannon
Permit Support Coordinator, Division of Coastal Manggemenc
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
.:............e�r 252.515.5406 (Office)
Amanda.cannan@ncdenrgov
isrt„?c:✓rc.5,xrrtxn;dY,t,:rhl5:rn 11c�oc:.f-as4:-,i1341:1 to IfK7 Myth C`rcen�P✓t3cfkxxrt; l.rr.v: ll
r : w. rti a:. u'1 to lhi dfxr.e;:

Bodnar, Gregg
From: Bodnar, Gregg
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 2:39 PM
To: Styron, Heather M.; Andre Webb
Subject: RE: [External] Re: changes needed for Chappell 5007 Holly lane major
Afternoon Andre,
With the changes that you discussed with Heather and the need to receive new riparian notifications I will place the
project on hold as of today, 4/18/22, until the revised workplans are available and the riparian forms are complete.
Please accept this as notification of the hold.
Keep me in the loop as you work through everything.
Thanks,
G regg
Gregg Bodnar
Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
Department of Environmental Quality
[phone] (NEW OFFICE NUMBER)
G regg.Bodna r@ ncdenr.Rov
Find a Field Rep (arcgis.com)
Email Correspondence to and from this address is hubject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Styron, Heather M. <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 11:34 AM
To: Andre Webb <[e-mail]>
Cc: Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] Re: changes needed for Chappell 5007 Holly lane major
Hey Andre,
We have received objections from Mr. Twisdale on this project and have reviewed his concerns. We have found that the
riparian access line orientation along his side needs to be corrected. If you give me a call we can discuss this.
Heather
Heather Styron
Field Representative
Division of Coastal Management 400 Commerce Avenue Morehead City, 28557
252.515.5417 (0) 252.725.3903 (M)
Heather. [e-mail]

www.deg.nc.gov
Find a Field Rep (arcqis.com)
From: Styron, Heather M.
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2022 10:08 AM
To: Andre Webb <[e-mail]>
Cc: Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] Re: changes needed for Chappell 5007 Holly lane major
Hey Andre,
I spoke with Gregg and we are not finding the adjacent neighbor notifications anywhere. Can you please send these so
this is not placed on hold.
Heather
Heather Styron
Field Representative
Division of Coastal Management 400 Commerce Avenue Morehead City, 28557
252.515.5417 (0) 252.725.3903 (M)
[e-mail]
www.deg.nc.gov
From: Andre Webb [mailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 7:25 AM
To: Styron, Heather M. <heather.m.stVron ncdenr.gov>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: changes needed for Chappell 5007 Holly lane major
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Hey,
The square footage for the walkway is removed from the roof calculation area.
The adj prop forms should have been in the file. Do you mind looking again?
I made the changes to the drawings and they are attached.
Thanks
Andre
252-665-4378
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:26 PM Styron, Heather M. <heather.m.styron@.ncdenr.Irov> wrote:
Thank you
From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 12:26 PM
To: Styron, Heather M. <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] Re: changes needed for Chappell 5007 Holly lane major

email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
ReoortSpam.
Ok I will get this info to you asap!
Thanks
._r, M,
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 16, 2022, at 11:13 AM, Styron, Heather M. <heather.m.styronkncdenr.gov> wrote:
Hey Andre,
Just a few things for this one;
Where are your green cards or signed riparian forms?
Does the existing roof cover take out the 6' wide pier access portion from the platform
sf calculations?
You are showing property lines I over the water and riparian lines. Is the labeled riparian
line the 15' setback or the actual riparian lines? The property line label needs to be
removed. If that is the actual riparian line it needs to be labeled as such and if the other
line is the 15' setback it needs to be labeled that way as well.
Once you make the changes and get everything I requested back to me then the application
should be accepted as complete on the date you submit the required addition/changes.
Thanks,

NIC Division of Coastal Management
Major permit Application Computer Sheet
(111O112O12)
Applicant: David Chappell 5007 holly Lane
Date: 3/14/2022
Project Site County Carteret
Staff: HMS
District: ❑Elizabeth City ❑Washington
EMorehead City ❑Wilmington
Project Name: Chappell
Date,ofinitial ,apptication_submittal (EX: ,11W007) 2/4/2022
Date application "received as complete' in the Field office; 2/21/2022
Permit Authorization: ®CAMA ❑Dredge & Fill ❑Both
SITE DESCRIPTION/PERMIT INFORMATION
PNA: ❑Yes ENo
Photos Taken: Yes ❑ NoE
Setback Required (riparian): EYes ❑No
Critical Habitat: []Yes ENo ❑Not Sure
15 foot waiver obtained: ❑Yes ENo
Hazard Notification Returned:
❑Yes ENo
SAV: EYes [-I No El Not Sure
Shell Bottom: []Yes ❑No ❑ Not Sure
Temporary Impacts: EYes ❑No
Sandbags: ❑Yes ❑No ❑ Not Sure
Did the land use classification come from
county LUP: ❑Yes ENo
Mitigation Required (optional):
❑Yes ENo
Moratorium Conditions: [-]Yes ❑No
ENA -
Environmental Assessment Done:
❑Yes ENo 1_-]NA
SECONDARY WATER CLASSIFICATION - OPTIONAL (choose MAX of 4)
WETLANDSIMPACTED
❑ (404) Corp. of Engineers (Jurisdictional
❑ (LS) Sea lavender (Limonium sp.) -
❑ (SS) Glasswort ( Salicornia sp.)
wetlands)
❑ (CJ) Saw grass (Cladium jamaicense)
❑ (SA) Salt marsh cordgrass (Spartina
❑ (SY) Salt reed grass (Spartina
alterniflora)
cynosuroides)
❑ (DS) Salt or spike grass (Distichlis spicata)
❑ (SC) Bullrush or three square (Scirpus sp.)
❑ (TY) Cattail (Typha sp.)
❑ (JR) Black needlerush (Juncus
❑ (SP) SalUmeadow grass (Spartina patens)
roemerianus)
APPLICATION FEE
❑ No fee required - $0.00
❑ I II(A), Private w/ D&F up to 1 acre; 3490 can
❑ I II(D) Priv., public or comm w/ D&F to 1 acre;
be applied - $250
3490 can't be applied - $400
❑ Minor Modification to a CAMA Major permit -
❑ Major Modification to a CAMA Major permit
❑ IV Any development involving D&F of more
$100
-$250
than 1 acre - $475
❑ Permit Transfer - $100
❑ Ill(B) Public or commercial w/ D&F to 1
❑ Express Permit - $2000
acre; 3490 can be applied - $400
❑ Major development extension request -
❑ ll. Public or commercial/no dredge and/or fill
$100
-$400
E I. Private no dredge and/or fill - $250
❑ Ill(C) Priv. public or comm w/D&F to 1 acre;
3490 can be applied; DCM needs D WQ
agreement-$400

MC Division of Coastal Mgt. Application Computer Sheet, Page 2 of 3)
Applicant David Chappell
Date: 3/14/2022
Describe below the ACTIVITIES that have been applied for. All values should match the dimension order, and units of
measurement found in your Activities code sheet.
TYPE
REPLACE
Activity Name
Number
Choose
Choose
Dimension 1
Dimension 2
Dimension 3
Dimension 4
One
One
boatlft
1
New Work ❑
Replace
13'
13'
Maint ❑
❑ Y N N
Tie pilings
2
New Work ®
Replace
2
2
Maint ❑
❑ Y ON
Finger pier
1
New Work N
Replace
18,
3'
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
1
New Work N
Replace
Finger pier
Maint ❑
❑ Y ON
26'
3'
New Work E
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y E N
New Work N
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work N
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work E
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
-
New Work N
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work N
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work N
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work E
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work N
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work N
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work E
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work ❑
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work ❑
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work ❑
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work ❑
Replace
Maint ❑
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work ❑
Replace
Maint 0
❑ Y ❑ N

Applicant David Chappell
Date: 3/14/2022
Describe below the HABITAT disturbances for the application. All values should match the name, and units of measurement
found in your Habitat code sheet.
Habitat Name
DISTURB TYPE
Choose One
TOTAL Sq. Ft.
(Applied for.
Disturbance total
includes any
anticipated
restoration or
tem im acts
FINAL Sq. Ft.
(Anticipated final
disturbance.
Excludes any
restoration
and/or temp
im act amount)
TOTAL Feet
(Applied for.
Disturbance
total includes
any anticipated
restoration or
temp impacts)
FINAL Feet
(Anticipated final
disturbance.
Excludes any
restoration and/or
temp impact
amount
Shallow Bottom
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ®
576sf
576sf
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ® Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ® Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill El Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Bath ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
-
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑

-----------------------
NC Division of Coastal Management 16421 A B cQ n
Cashier's Official Receipt
' I4S Date:S.L20 ss off.
Received From: u^VI� `- $ Q50
Permit No.: Y-V`A' nn 6pli f Check No.: 50$/
Applicant's Name: �GiZVIA 'P- County: 61AP-riol
Project Address
Please retain receipt for your records as proof of payment for permit issued.
Signature of Agent or Applicant: / Date: 1�
Signature of Field Representative: —1 Date-.,2MJ0,

t
�
D
r
�
O
C7 Fr U.
c
D O
=
F71
�:U D O
D
—�
-I
FT
�
_
�
-
F--
O
-'
c z F-
o
�
Nz
00
D
Ul
FT-1
a
Vd
(�
'
v
A
♦
v
m
W
s
s
0
m
0
0
N
N
^mm
6./
WEm PWflN6 & PF51GN
project:
DAVID CHAPPELL-
date; 01/16/2022
e"ae: AS NOTO
AN712E MDF3
5007
HOLLY LANE, MOREHEAD CITY,
NC pro ec r no.:
3h13 AOI i7 Al�l'ORf �OA17
rawng:
g OC-1
cDaviiddCha elAw
NEW MVN, NC 28562
PROFILE ELEVATIONS
w "
no.
revision
by dots 252-665-9398
1 OF 4

KERWIN I
5005 HOLLY LANE
MOREHEAD CITY, NC %
rRIPARIAN LINE
NHW LINE FbCCOWS-SEANLALL - ---_
EXISTING PLATFORM
69 SO. FT. --
CHAPPEL
5007 HOLLY LANE
MOREHEAD ClTY, NC . . • •rr
` .EXISTING
TWISDALE
5009 HOLLY LANE
MOREHEAD CITY, NC
X 0 0.1' X 0.1' 15' SETBACK ---- ----
X _ X-1.1' X 1.45'
X0.0' X 1.9'
EAWALL -0.1' X-0.1' X
X1.45, X
LEGEND
COASTAL MARSH
X 1'0 WATER DEPTHS AT LOW TIDE
m
0
o
" n
U
Z
— - — - —
PROPERTY LINE
SLIP NUMBER
J
NORTH
Q o
SCALE: 1 "=30'
� �
oz
-
J
-'---
EXISTING STEP-DOWN___ ----
Q_ e X3-3 - -
-__ 171 SO. FT.
-2.5X
X-3.7r-------------
rl
o
EXISTING PLATFORM -"--
"'
EXISTING ROOF COVER _1 g X
--_
-------- —
RIPARIAN LINE ----------------------- ------------------------ ^mil
-------
RECEIVED
MAY 1 7 2022
POP SECTION WIND
�
N
z
z
Zio'klN
N
TL
Z
I I I I<1<la I

TOTAL SHORELINE LENGTH
92' 92 X 8=736
LEGEND
KERWIN
I
PLATFORM SQ. FT.
CALCULATIONS
`,•,`,`, COASTAL MARSH
5005 HOLLY LANE
EX. BY STEPS
69
` ` ` `
MOREHEAD CITY, NC
EX. ROOF COVER
108
X 1.0 WATER DEPTHS AT LOW TIDE
STEP DOWN
1
EX.. END PLATFORM
256
— -
PROP. 3'X18'
54
— - — _
PROPERTY LINE
- -
PROP. 3'X26'
78
-
_ RIPARIAN LINE
GRAND TOTAL
736
2Q SLIP NUMBER
NHW LINE FOZZOWS �fy4WALL
--------------
NORTH
I
EXISTING PLATFORM
-_'---------------------
------------------------------
SCALE:1_=30'
69 SQ. FT.
------------------
_
---------------------
X .0' -0.1'
0.1'
15' SETBACK
--------------------
CHAPPEL
X
-
5007 HOLLY LANE
MOREHEAD CITY, NC
X _-
0.0
X-1.1-1.45'
-------------E*SFING_STE.P DOWN
'.EXISTIN
X
SEAWALL -0.1'
X
_0.1'
X
-1.9,
X3.3' 171 StQ.--T-----------
.5' 3.7'
X X-
-1.1' X
-1.45'
X
EXISTING PLATFORM
- = __ z-
EXISTING
ROOF COVER
-1.9
X -3 T 256 SQ. FT.
- _
------------------
108
SQ. Fr.
EXISTING DOCKING FACILITY
-2•5 3.3'X X
-
-----------------------------------
3 x18 EXISTING BOAT LIFT
PROPERTY CORNER
----
----------------------
---------- ------------
15' SETBACK
PROPOSED FINGER DOCK rr0,,
3'x26'� 132 SQ. FT.
TWISDALE
_-------
O 1
5009 HOLLY LANE
--- ---------_ ---------__
-"----- _ ---------__
MOREHEAD CITY, NC
RIPARIAN
LINE
-------'------_____
PROPOSED BOAT EF7-----
-
------------------- Q5
-----------------Q5
MAY 9 ?022
.rip SEe%-oTl 4 M "ID
g
U
Z
U
0
0
z
a
w
N
0
w
N
0
a
0
of
a_
N
�
vNv
21
n
,
N
N
m
m
a
0
v°
i
a
a
n
rl�

EXISTING ROOF COVER
EXISTING PROFILE ELEVATION
SCALE: 3/32"=1'-O"
EXISTING ROOF COVER
PROPOSED PROFILE ELEVATION
SCALE: 3/32"=1'-O"
EXISTING WET SLIP
SUP #1
PIUNG-/ MUDLINE
EXISTING WET SLIP
SLIP #1
NG BOAT LIFT
SLIP #2
M,
U
Zy
F
U
O N
J O
d L j
Q O w
2 J
U w
p Lil w
Z
a
p O
J �
0
0
0
Ln
z
N
n
C.6
EXISTING BOAT LIFT
¢
SLIP #2
n
N
z
PROPOSED BOAT LIFT
4
SLIP #3
`PROPOSED FINGER
0
NHW
r
u � u u� u uu
PILING MUDLINE o
RECEIVED
FEB 0 4 2M
A

TOTAL SHORELINE LENGTH 92' 92 X 8=736
LEGEND
PLATFORM SO. FT. CALCULATIONS COASTAL MARSH
KERWIN . . . .
5005 HOLLY LANE EX. BY STEPS 69
MOREHEAD CITY, NC EX. ROOF COVER 108 X1.0' WATER DEPTHS AT LOW TIDE
CHAPPEL
5007 HOLLY LANE
MOREHEAD CITY, NC
TWISDALE
5009 HOLLY LANE
MOREHEAD CITY, NC
EX. STEP DOWN 171
— - —
EX. END PLATFORM 256
PROP. 3'X18' 54 PROPERTY LINE
PROP. 3'X26' 78
PROPERTY LINE GRAND TOTAL 736 z0 SLIP NUMBER
�NHW LINE FbCNWS-SEAyYALL _ _ NORTH
EXISTING PLATFORM ------------- - SCALE: 1 "=30'
69 SQ. FT. ----------- - -
X 0.0 X 0.1 RIPARIAN LINE ------------- - _
X0.0' X - X-1.1' X 1.45'------------------- =3.3 - EXIS 1171 SQ.FT�W� -
-1.9' X --
EXISTIN SEAWALL -0.1' X-01' X 1 1' X X -2.5'X O r
-1.45' v
EXISTING ROOF COVER
108 SQ FT
�X-3JT---
--EXISTING PLATFORM -
-3.7' 256 SO. FT. Lq
U
z
U
0
J
w=
aw
_o
U
z
ag
or
J
J
0
r-
0
0
Ln
- `-----__ _
EXISTING DOCKING FACILITY-' 3•S X
� N
-'------____
3'x18' z EXISTING BOAT LIFT
_
- -
-
"----__ RIPARIAN LINE PROPOSED FINGER DOCK rram�,
- ---"------___ 3'x26' 3 132 SQ. FT. �1
O
z 8 co
z z
PROPERTY LINE %� -
- ----__
n
/
_
�- _ '------------------ PROPOSED BOAT LIFT
fl
7a < 3:
n
_---
RECEIVED
FEB 0 4 2022
DCM-MHD CITY

LEGEND
KERWIN I ,',`, COASTAL MARSH
5005 HOLLY LANE ' ' '
MOREHEAD CITY, NC -"0'
WATM DEPTHS AT LOW TIDE
CHAPPEL
5007 HOLLY LANE
MOREHEAD CITY, NC
TWISDALE
5009 HOLLY LANE
MOREHEAD CITY, NC
PROPERTY LINE
- _ PROPERTY LINE zQ SLIP NUMBER
,—,NHW LINE FOCLOWS-SFA%)ALL _ - - - _ NORTH
EXISTING PLATFORM ------__ _ - - - SCALE: 1 "=30'
69 SQ. FT.
X 0 X 0.1 RIPARIAN LINE f ----- _
X _ X-1.1' -1.45'--------- --- ___3.3' EXISTING GSSTEP-OOWN�
0.0 X
X X -1.9, o -- e - -__ 171 SQ. FT. -
'EXISTIN SEAWALL -0.1e -0.1' X 1.1' X X -2 5'X O X X-3 7*-"----------------
-1.45' X EXISTING PLATFORM -
EXISTING ROOF COVER -1.9' X 3 7, 256 SQ. FT. q
- ----_____ -- 108 SQ. FL• EXISTING DOCKING FACILITY -2'S -3.3'X -
X
EXISTING BOAT LIFT
RIPARIAN LINE
PROPERTY LINE
4
RECEIVED
FEB 0 4 20"?
DCM-MHD CITi
U
z
U
0Q
J W
LJ =
dw
_o
U
O Z
ag
o�
J
J
0
_
rl
0
0
Ln
Z
IL
w
tz
U
z
V)
x
W
z
N
fl

111/i
1
KERWIN I
5005 HOLLY LANE
MOREHEAD CITY, NC J�
LNH�
RIPARIAN LINE_-\
FaCCO1MS�EAy(ALLPLATFORMQ. FT.
CHAPPEL X 0.0'
5007 HOLLY LANE
MOREHEAD CITY, NC X0.0' X
+ ` .EXISTIN SEAWALL -0.1'
TWISDALE
5009 HOLLY LANE
MOREHEAD CITY, NC
TOTAL SHORELINE LENGTH 92' 92 X 8=736
LEGEND
PLATFORM SQ. FT. CALCULATIONS -" COASTAL MARSH
EX. BY STEPS 69
EX. ROOF COVER 108 X 1.0'
EX. STEP DOWN 171 WATER DEPTHS AT LOW TIDE
EX. END PLATFORM 256
PROP. 3'X18' 54 — - — - — PROPERTY LINE
PROP. 3'X26' 78
GRAND TOTAL 736 2Q SLIP NUMBER
NO TH
---__ SCALE: 1"=30'
15' SETBACK f
1.1' X 1.45'
X -1.9, °
X -2.5'
-0.1 X 1.1' X1.45' X X
-EXISTING ROOF COVER _1.9' X
108 SQ. FT.
EXISTING DOCKING FACILITY -2'53.:
----_ _ 3'x18'
15' SETBACK 3'x26'
RIPARIAN LINE
�- EXISTING SQ-D0WN____
171
I
z
n
0
0
EXISTING PLATFORM --[�
X 3.7' 256 SQ. FT.
Z N
2 �
EXISTING BOAT LIFT ao
PROPOSED FINGER DOCK
132 0 SQ. FT.
N
_____PROPOSED BOAT LIFT Q N
-- ^� \ O
fa
-s
0
Ike

LEGEND
� � g
KERWIN I • , , COASTAL MARSH o V o o$ 0
5005 HOLLY LANE
MOREHEAD CITY, NC I X 1.0' WATER DEPTHS AT LOW TIDE
/ z
— PROPERTY LINE
- _ RIPARIAN LINE 2 0
� SLIP NUMBER Z
--------_ _---------___ _Ldg
NHW LINE FaCCOWS�EANLALL -- --__NQ,JRTH vwQo
SCALE: 1"=30'
I -------------------------- ---------------------------
EXISTING PLATFORM _ o Li
69 SQ. FT.
-0.1'
CHAPPEL 0 X 0 1 15' SETBACK-___-- _ - J N
_ x
J W
5007 HOLLY LANE X-1.1' -1 45' -- --____ EXISTING STEP DOWa___ o
MOREHEAD CITY, NC X0,0' X X -1.9' 3 3 _ 171 SO. FT. _
`.EXISTIN SEAWALL -0.1' X X X �° X --- ^
-0.1 -1.1 X -2.5X X-3.7----------------- o
. ' . ' . -1.45' X EXISTING PLATFORM ----- "' a
-'---* _= EXISTING ROOF COVER
-- ------ 108 SQ. FT. -1.9 X ) -3.7
2.5' 256 SQ. FT.
cl
- --------------- EXISTING DOCKING FACILITY -3.3' X
2 EXISTING BOAT LIFT
- _--------------- -- 15' SETBACK ro
5009�HODLLYELANE--------------- ---------- n
MOREHEAD CITY, INC / RIPARIAN LINE z
Qq
� o
tV v
0
3 r
a