110-17 Grand View Holdings LLC

Permit Class
NEW
Permit Number
110-17
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Quality
and
Coastal Resources Commission
Vermit
RECEIVED
SEP 2 8 2017
for tg rMFID CITY
X Major Development in an Area of Envirorimen
pursuant to NCGS 113A-118
Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229
Issued to Grand View Holdings LLC, c/o Chris Bailey, PO Box 400, Jacksonville, NC 28541
Authorizing development in New Hanover County at adi. to the AIWW 202 Summer Rest Road,
Wi mi gion , as requested in the permittee's application dated 4/11/17 Incl. attached workolan
drwgs (8). Figs 3 & 5 of 10 dated revised 6/8/17; Figs 4, 6-8, and 10 of 10 dated rev. 5/9/17; & Fig. 9 of 10 dated 5/9/17.
This permit, issued on September 25, 2017 , is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent
with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may
to tines, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause me permit to De null anu vuru.
Docking & Pier Access Facility
1) This permit authorizes only the expanded docks, piers, and other structures and uses located in or
over the water that are expressly and specifically set forth in the permit application. No other
structure, whether floating or stationary, shall become a permanent part of this expanded docking &
pier access facility without permit modification. No non -water dependent uses of structures shall be
conducted on, in or over Public Trust waters without permit modification.
2) No sewage, whether treated or untreated, shall be discharged at any time from any boats using the
expanded docking & pier access facility. Any sewage discharge at the docking facility shall be
considered a violation of this permit for which the permittee is responsible. This prohibition shall be
applied and enforced throughout the entire existence of the permitted structure.
(See attached sheets for Additional Conditions)
This permit action may be appealed by the permittee or other
qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the issuing date.
This permit must be accessible on -site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification not covered
hereunder requires further Division approval.
All work must cease when the permit expires on
December 31, 2020
In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees that
your project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal
Management Program.
Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DEQ and the
Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission.
—�RBraxton C. Davis, Director
Division of Coastal Management
This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted.
Signature of Permittee

Grand View Holdings, LLC Permit No.110-17
Page 2 of 4
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
3) The permittee shall maintain the authorized work in good condition and in conformance with the terms
and conditions of this permit. The permittee is not relieved of this requirement if he abandons the
permitted activity without having it transferred to a third party.
4) The permittee shall install and maintain at his expense any signal lights or signals prescribed by the U.S.
Coast Guard, through regulation or otherwise, on the authorized facilities. At a minimum, permanent
reflectors shall be attached to the structure in order to make it more visible during hours of darkness or
inclement weather.
5) This permit authorizes a maximum of 10 formalized boat slips. No formalized docking space is
authorized at the Motts Creek pier facility.
6) No portion of the authorized structures shall extend more than one quarter of the width of the water body.
Measurements to determine the width of the water body shall be made from the waterward edge of any
coastal wetland vegetation which borders the water body.
7) Any portion of the permitted access pier and platform built over Coastal Wetlands shall not exceed six
feet in width and shall be elevated a minimum of three feet over the wetland substrate as measured from
the bottom of the decking.
8) The authorized covered platform shall not be enclosed. Any material used on the sides shall not obstruct
view and shall be permeable to air and water. Screen or wire on the sides along with benches and knee
walls are permitted. Lattice is specifically excluded from being used under this authorization.
9) The authorized covered platform shall be single story, and shall not be designed to allow for second story
use.
10) No attempt shall be made by the permittee to prevent the full and free use by the public of all navigable
waters at or adjacent to the authorized work.
1 l) At least one week prior to the initiation of any construction activities authorized by this permit, and again
24 hours prior to construction, the permittee shall notify the Division of Marine Fisheries, Shellfish
Sanitation and Recreational Water Quality, at [phone], of the anticipated construction start date.
Northeast Interceptor Sewer Line Protection
12) If at any time during construction it is suspected that the Town of Wrightsville Beach's Northeast
Interceptor sewer line (NEI) has been disturbed, the permittee shall immediately cease construction
activities and contact the Town of Wrightsville Beach, and the Division of Marine Fisheries, Shellfish
Sanitation and Recreational Water Quality and the Division of Water Resources. Both agencies can be
contacted at [phone].
13) Measures should be taken to protect the NEI from any incidental impacts from facility use. At a
minimum, signs indicating the presence of the NEI, "no anchor" signs, and contact information for the
Town shall be posted on site directing immediate notification of the Town of Wrightsville Beach sVhQ�d
it be suspected that a vessel has contacted the NEI. �c Cb

Grand View Holdings, LLC
Permit No.110-17
Page 2 of 4 .
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
3) The permittee shall maintain the authorized work in good condition and in conformance with the terms
and conditions of this permit. The permittee is not relieved of this requirement if he abandons the
permitted activity without having it transferred to a third party.
4) The permittee shall install and maintain at his expense any signal lights or signals prescribed by the U.S.
Coast Guard, through regulation or otherwise, on the authorized facilities. At a minimum, permanent
reflectors shall be attached to the structure in order to make it more visible during hours of darkness or
inclement weather.
5) This permit authorizes a maximum of 10 formalized boat slips. No formalized docking space is
authorized at the Motts Creek pier facility.
6) No portion of the.authorized structures shall extend more than one quarter of the width of the water body.
Measurements to determine the width. of the water body shall be made from the waterward edge of any
coastal wetland vegetation which borders the water body. .
7) Any portion of the permitted access pier and platform built over Coastal Wetlands shall not exceed six
feet in width and shall be elevated -a minimum of three feet over the wetland substrate as measured from
the bottom of the decking.
8) The authorized covered platform shall not be enclosed. Any material used on the sides shall not obstruct
view and shall be permeable to air and water. Screen or wire on the sides along with benches and knee
walls are permitted. Lattice is specifically excluded from being used under this authorization.
9) The authorized covered platform shall be single story, and shall not be designed to allow for second story
use.
10) No attempt shall be made by the permittee to prevent the full and free use by the public of all navigable
waters at or adjacent to the authorized work.
11) At least one week prior to the initiation of any construction activities authorized by this permit, and again
24 hours prior to construction, the permittee shall notify the Division of Marine Fisheries, Shellfish
Sanitation and Recreational Water Quality, at [phone], of the anticipated construction start date.
Northeast Interceptor Sewer Line Protection
12) If at any time during construction it is suspected that the Town of Wrightsville Beach's Northeast
Interceptor sewer line (NEI) has been disturbed, the permittee shall immediately cease construction
activities and contact the Town of Wrightsville'Beach, and the Division of Marine Fisheries, Shellfish
Sanitation and Recreational Water Quality and the Division of Water Resources. Both agencies can be
contacted at [phone].
13) Measures should be taken to protect the NEI from any incidental impacts from facility use. At a
minimum, signs indicating the presence of the NEI, "no anchor" signs, and contact information for the
Town shall be posted on site directing immediate notification of the Town of Wrightsville Beach sh , 1c ,
it be suspected that a vessel has contacted the NEI. a
. 0 if.%T-1

Grand View Holdings, LLC Permit No.110-17
Page 3 of 4
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
14) Vessels with a draft deeper than 24" shall not be docked at Slips 3, 4 and/or 5.
15) The portion of the authorized docking facility located to the north of the detachment point as indicated
on attached workplan drawing 5 of 10 shall remain easily removable for the life of the authorized
structure. This section of the dock shall be removed immediately upon request by the Town of
Wrightsville Beach or Cape Fear Public Utility Authority in the event that inspection, maintenance
and/or repairs to the NEI are deemed necessary. The requirements of this condition shall be added as a
deed restriction for the subject property and recorded with the New Hanover County Register of Deeds
and a copy provided to DCM prior to the initiation of construction.
16) The permittee shall conduct a post -construction survey of the location of the authorized docking facility
and the NEI. A copy of the post -construction survey shall be provided to DCM within 60 days of
completion of the docking facility.
17) The permittee shall monitor any changes in substrate depth over the NEI line to ensure the line does not
become exposed over time.
NOTE: The permittee is strongly encouraged to coordinate a pre -construction meeting with the Town of
Wrightsville Beach prior to the initiation of construction.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Conditions
18) In order to further protect the endangered West Indian Manatee, Trichechus manatus, the applicant shall
implement the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service's Manatee Guidelines, and strictly adhere to all
requirements within. The guidelines can be found at:
htti)://www.fws.gov/nc-es/mamrnal/manatee 2uidelines.pdf.
19) The permittee understands and agrees that, if future operations by the United States requires the removal,
relocation, or other alteration of the structure or work authorized by this permit, or if in the opinion of the
Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative, said structure or work shall cause unreasonable
obstruction to free navigation of the navigable waters, the permittee shall be required, upon due notice
from the Corps of Engineers, to remove relocate or alter the structural work or obstructions caused thereby,
without expense to the United States or the state of North Carolina.
20) Approval of the structure was based on a determination that there would be no obstruction to navigation.
The structure may be damaged by wave wash from passing vessels. Issuance of this permit should not be
construed as relieving the permittee of taking proper steps to ensure the structure and moored boats will
not be damaged by wave wash.
21) The permittee, upon receipt of a notice of revocation of this permit or upon its expiration before
completion of the work will, without expense to the United States and in such time and manner as the
Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative may direct, restore the water or wetland to its pre -
project condition. RECEIVED
SFp2a" 11

Grand View Holdings, LLC Permit No.110-17
Page 4 of 4
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
General
22) The permittee and/or his or her contractor shall meet with a representative of the Division prior to
project initiation.
23) This permit shall not be assigned, transferred, sold, or otherwise disposed of to a third parry without the
written approval of the Division of Coastal Management.
24) This permit does not authorize the interference with any existing or proposed Federal project, and the
permittee shall not be entitled to compensation for damage to the authorized structure or work, or injury
which may be caused from existing or future operations undertaken by the United States in the public
interest.
25) No excavation or filling of any open water area or vegetated wetlands is authorized by this permit.
Dredging in any manner, including "kicking" with boat propellers, is not authorized.
26) If a court of competent jurisdiction determines that a party other than the permittee has legal rights to
any part of the area approved under this permit, this permit shall be null and void as to the area the court
determines is not owned by the permittee. This condition shall take effect on the date such court
judgment becomes final. In such event, the permittee shall consult DCM prior to initiating or continuing
any further development under this permit.
NOTE: If a well will serve the new docking facility and it has the potential to serve 25 people, 60 days a
year, it may be a Public Water System. Please contact the Department of Environmental Quality -
Public Water Supply Section at [phone] for additional information.
NOTE: Future development of the permittee's property may require a modification of this permit.
Contact a representative of the Division at [phone] prior to the commencement of any
such activity for this determination. The permittee is further advised that many non -water
dependent activities are not authorized within 30 feet of the normal high water level.
NOTE: This permit does not eliminate the need to obtain any additional state, federal or local permits,
approvals or authorizations that may be required.
NOTE: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers assigned the proposed project Action ID No. SAW-201 1 -
00775.
NOTE: The N.C. Division of Water Resources assigned the proposed project DWR Project No. DWR-
2011-0410v4.
NOTE: An application processing fee of $400 was received by DCM for this project.
,jeCEIVED
su 2 8 Z017
0CW,n MHD CITY

Grand View holdings, LLC Permit No.110-17
Page 4 of 4
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
General
22) The permittee and/or his or her contractor shall meet with a representative of the Division prior to
project initiation.
23) This permit shall not be assigned, transferred, sold, or otherwise disposed of to a third party without the
written approval of the Division of Coastal Management.
24) This permit does not authorize the interference with any existing or proposed Federal project, and the
permittee shall not be entitled to compensation for damage to the authorized structure or work, or injury
which may be caused from existing or future operations undertaken by the United States in the public
interest.
25) No excavation or filling of any open water area or vegetated wetlands is authorized by this permit.
Dredging in any manner, including "kicking" with boat propellers, is not authorized.
26) If a court of competent jurisdiction determines that a party other than the permittee has legal rights to
any part of the area approved under this permit; this permit shall be null and void as to the area the court
determines is not owned by the permittee. This condition shall take effect on the date such court
judgment becomes final. In such event, the permittee shall consult DCM prior to initiating or continuing
any further development under this permit.
NOTE: If a well will serve the new docking facility and it has the potential to serve 25 people, 60 days a
year, it may be a Public Water System. Please contact the Department of Environmental Quality -
Public Water Supply Section at [phone] for additional information.
NOTE: Future development of the permittee's property may require a modification of this permit.
Contact a representative of the Division at [phone] prior to the commencement of any
such activity for this determination. The permittee is further advised that many non -water
dependent activities are not authorized within 30 feet of the normal high water level.
NOTE: This permit does not eliminate the need to obtain any additional state, federal or local permits,
approvals or authorizations that may be required.
NOTE: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers assigned the proposed project Action ID No. SAW-2011-
00775.
NOTE: The N.C. Division of Water Resources assigned the proposed project DWR Project No. DWR-
2011-0410v4.
NOTE: An application processing fee of $400 was received by DCM for this project.
RECENED
SEP 9 N17

Permit Class
NEW
Permit Number
110-17
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Quality
and
Coastal Resources Commission
Permit
for
X Major Development in an Area of Environmental Concern
pursuant to NCGS 113A-118
Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229
Issued to Grand View Holdings, LLC, c/o Chris Bailey, PO Box 400, Jacksonville, NC 28541
Authorizing development in New Hanover County at adi. to the AIWW, 202 Summer Rest Road,
Wilmington , as requested in the permittee's application dated 4/11/17, incl. attached workplan
drwgs (8), Figs 3 & 5 of 10 dated revised 6/8/17; Figs 4, 6-8, and 10 of 10 dated rev. 5/9/17; & Fig. 9 of 10 dated 5/9/17.
This permit, issued on September 13, 2017 , is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent
with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may
be subject to fines, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and void.
Docking & Pier Access Facility
1) This permit authorizes only the expanded docks, piers, and other structures and uses located in or
over the water that are expressly and specifically set forth in the permit application. No other
structure, whether floating or stationary, shall become a permanent part of this expanded docking &
pier access facility without permit modification. No non -water dependent uses of structures shall be
conducted on, in or over Public Trust waters without permit modification.
2) No sewage, whether treated or untreated, shall be discharged at any time from any boats using the
expanded docking & pier access facility. Any sewage discharge at the docking facility shall be
considered a violation of this permit for which the permittee is responsible. This prohibition shall be
applied and enforced throughout the entire existence of the permitted structure.
(See attached sheets for Additional Conditions)
This permit action may be appealed by the permittee or other
qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the issuing date.
This permit must be accessible on -site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification not covered
hereunder requires further Division approval.
All work must cease when the permit expires on
December 31, 2020
In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees that
your project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal
Management Program.
Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DEQ and the
Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission.
Braxton C. Davis, Director
Division of Coastal Management
This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted.
Signature of Permittee

Grand View Holdings, LLC Permit No. 110-17
Page 2 of 4
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
3) The permittee shall maintain the authorized work in good condition and in conformance with the terms
and conditions of this permit. The permittee is not relieved of this requirement if he abandons the
i permitted activity without having it transferred to a third party.
The permittee shall install and maintain at his expense any signal lights or signals prescribed by the U.S.
Coast Guard, through regulation or otherwise, on the authorized facilities. At a minimum, permanent
reflectors shall be attached to the structure in order to make it more visible during hours of darkness or
inclement weather.
5) This permit authorizes a maximum of 10 formalized boat slips. No formalized docking space is
authorized at the Motts Creek pier facility.
6) No portion of the authorized structures shall extend more than one quarter of the width of the water body.
Measurements to determine the width of the water body shall be made from the waterward edge of any
coastal wetland vegetation which borders the water body.
7) Any portion of the permitted access pier and platform built over Coastal Wetlands shall not exceed six
feet in width and shall be elevated a minimum of three feet over the wetland substrate as measured from
the bottom of the decking.
8) The authorized covered platform shall not be enclosed. Any material used on the sides shall not obstruct
view and shall be permeable to air and water. Screen or wire on the sides along with benches and knee
walls are permitted. Lattice is specifically excluded from being used under this authorization.
9) The authorized covered platform shall be single story, and shall not be designed to allow for second story
use.
10) No attempt shall be made by the permittee to prevent the full and free use by the public of all navigable
waters at or adjacent to the authorized work.
11) At least one week prior to the initiation of any construction activities authorized by this permit, and again
24 hours prior to construction, the permittee shall notify the Division of Marine Fisheries, Shellfish
Sanitation and Recreational Water Quality, at [phone], of the anticipated construction start date.
Northeast Interceptor Sewer Line Protection
12) If at any time during construction it is suspected that the Town of Wrightsville Beach's Northeast
Interceptor sewer line (NEI) has been disturbed, the permittee shall immediately cease construction
activities and contact the Town of Wrightsville Beach, (}Ite-CFWAY)-and the Division of Marine
Fisheries, Shellfish Sanitation and Recreational Water Quality) and the Division of Water Resources at
[phone].
ar'.
13) Measures should be taken to protect the NEI from any incidental impacts from facility use. At a
minimum, signs indicating the presence of the NEI, "no anchor" signs, and contact information for the
Town shall be posted on site directing immediate notification of the Town of Wrightsville Beach should
it be suspected that a vessel has contacted the NEI. Reasonable measures shall be taken to ensure that
vessels with a deeper draft do not utilize the areas of Ihe dock iu the immediate vicinity of the NEI.
y� ✓? w r1 '' Mr ry SHa✓6(

Grand View Holdings, LLC
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Permit No. 110-17
Page 3 of 4
14) The portion of the authorized docking facility located to the north of the detachment point as indicated
on attached workplan drawing 5 of 10 shall remain easily removable for the life of the authorized
structure. This section of the dock shall be removed immediately upon request by the Town of
Wrightsville Beach or Cape Fear Public Utility Authority in the event that inspection, maintenance
and/or repairs to the NEI are deemed necessary. (Add deed restriction requirement?)
15) The permittee shall conduct a post -construction survey of the location of the authorized docking facility
and the NEI. A copy of the post -construction survey shall be provided to DCM within 60 days of
completion of the docking facility.
16) The permittee shall monitor any changes in substrate depth over the NEI line to ensure the line does not
become exposed over time. Surveys of the NEI and its substrate dgverage 1hall be conductedZrce a
-year,-and-a copyafieach survey shallbe provic7edt6'tb&-i6wn of_WrightsviHe Bich.
NOTE: The permittee is strongly encouraged to coordinate a pre -construction meeting with the Town of
Wrightsville Beach prior to the initiation of construction.
U.S. Army Corns of Engineers Conditions
17) In order to further protect the endangered West Indian Manatee, Trichechus manatus, the applicant shall
implement the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service's Manatee Guidelines, and strictly adhere to all
requirements within. The guidelines can be found at:
hU://www.fws.gov/nc-es/mammal/manatee guidelines.pdf.
18) The permittee understands and agrees that, if future operations by the United States requires the removal,
relocation, or other alteration of the structure or work authorized by this permit, or if in the opinion of the
Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative, said structure or work shall cause unreasonable
obstruction to free navigation of the navigable waters, the permittee shall be required, upon due notice
from the Corps of Engineers, to remove relocate or alter the structural work or obstructions caused thereby,
without expense to the United States or the state of North Carolina.
19) Approval of the structure was based on a determination that there would be no obstruction to navigation.
The structure may be damaged by wave wash from passing vessels. Issuance of this permit should not be
construed as relieving the permittee of taking proper steps to ensure the structure and moored boats will
not be damaged by wave wash.
20) The permittee, upon receipt of a notice of revocation of this permit or upon its expiration before
completion of the work will, without expense to the United States and in such time and manner as the
Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative may direct, restore the water or wetland to its pre -
project condition.
General
21) The permittee and/or his or her contractor shall meet with a representative of the Division prior to
project initiation.

written approval of the Division of Coastal Management.
Grand View Holdings, LLC Permit No. 110-17
Page 4 of 4
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
23) This permit does not authorize the interference with any existing or proposed Federal project, and the
permittee shall not be entitled to compensation for damage to the authorized structure or work, or injury
which may be caused from existing or future operations undertaken by the United States in the public
interest.
24) No excavation or filling of any open water area or vegetated wetlands is authorized by this permit.
Dredging in any manner, including "kicking" with boat propellers, is not authorized.
25) If a court of competent jurisdiction determines that a party other than the permittee has legal rights to
any part of the area approved under this permit, this permit shall be null and void as to the area the court
determines is not owned by the permittee. This condition shall take effect on the date such court
judgment becomes final. In such event, the permittee shall consult DCM prior to initiating or continuing
any further development under this permit.
NOTE: If a well will serve the new docking facility and it has the potential to serve 25 people, 60 days a
year, it may be a Public Water System. Please contact the Department of Environmental Quality -
Public Water Supply Section at [phone] for additional information.
NOTE: Future development of the permittee's property may require a modification of this permit.
Contact a representative of the Division at [phone] prior to the commencement of any
such activity for this determination. The permittee is further advised that many non -water
dependent activities are not authorized within 30 feet of the normal high water level.
NOTE: This permit does not eliminate the need to obtain any additional state, federal or local permits,
approvals or authorizations that may be required.
NOTE: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers assigned the proposed project Action ID No. SAW-2011-
00775.
NOTE: The N.C. Division of Water Resources assigned the proposed project DWR Project No. DWR-
2011-0410v4.
NOTE: An application processing fee of $400 was received by DCM for this project.

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
89 DARLINGTON AVENUE -
�. WILMINGTON, NORTHCAROLINA'28403.1343
September 26, 2017 .,
Action ID No., SAW-20.11-00775; 202, Summer Rest Rd.
Bailey and Associates, Inc.
Attn: Mr. Chris Bailey
Post Office -Box 400
Jacksonville, North Carolina 28541
Dear Mr. Bailey:
Reference your application for a Department of the Army permit for replacement of an
existing community docking facility at 202 Summer Rest Road, within the AIW W and Motts
Creek. in Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina.
Your proposal has been reviewed and found to be consistent with the provisions and
objectives of the CAMA-Corps Programmatic Permit process (copy attached) for construction
activities that receive authorization from the State of North Carolina. Therefore, you may
commence construction activity in strict accordance with applicable State aiithoriiation and
attached Federal special conditions and the attached revised plans dated 05/09/2017. Failure to
comply with the State authorization or conditions of the Federal permit could result in civil
and/or administrative penalties.
If any change in your work is required because of unforeseen or altered conditions or for
any other reason, plans revised to show the change must be sent promptly to this office and the
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management prior to performing any such change or
alteration. Such, action is necessary as revised plans must be reviewed and the authorization
modified. Your Department of the Army permit will expire on December 31, 2021.
I
E

Questions or comments may be addressed to Mr. Tyler Crumbley, WilmingtonTield
Office, Regulatory -Branch, telephone [phone].
Enclosures:
Special Conditions
LAMA Permit
GP 291 conditions
Revised Plans (dated 05/09/2017)
Copy Furnished (w4nclosures):
Land -Management Group, Inc.,
Attn: Mr. Steve Morrison
3805 Wrightsville Ave, Suite 15
F
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
Copies furnished (w/o enclosures):
Mr. Doug Huggett - NCDEQ/DCM
W. Chad Coburn - NCDEQ/DWR
Ms. Karen.Higgins - NCDEQ/DWR
Ms. Heathei_Coats — NCDEQ/DCM
Dr. Pace Wilber—NMFS/HCS
Dr. Ken Riley—NMFS/HCS
Mr. Pete Benjamin — USFWS/FEW
Mr. Todd A. Bowers —USEPAIWPD
2
Sincerely,
//
Tyler Crumbley
Regulatory Project Managez

Special Conditions
Bailey & Associates, Inc. — c/o: Mr. Chris Bailey
SAW-2011-00775
1. In order to further protect the endangered West Indian Manatee, Trichechus
manatus, the applicant must implement the U.S. Fish- and Wildlife Service's Manatee
Guidelines, and strictly adheie,to all requirement's therein. The guidelines can be found at
http://www.fWs.govinc-6sjinammmUmanatee euideliries:ndf
2. No dredging is authorized:
3. The permittee must install and maintain, at his expense, any signal lights and signals
prescribed by the U.S. Coast Guard, through regulations or otherwise, on authorized facilities.
For further information, the permittee shouldcontact the U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Office
at (910) 772-21.91.
4. , All work authorized by this permit must be performed in strict compliance with the
submitted plans, which area part of this permit;'Any modification to these plans must be
approved by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) prior to implementation.
5. The docks and piers extending over wetlands will be elevated sufficiently (a
minimum of 3 feet) above the wetland substrate to prevent total shading of vegetation, substrate,
or other elements of the aquatic environment.
6. The permittee understands and agrees that,, if future operations by the United States,
require the removal, relocation, or other alteration, of the structure or work herein authorized, or
if, in the opinion of the Secretary:of the Army or his authorized, representative, said structure or
work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of the navigable waters, the
permittee will be required, upon due notice from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, to remove,
relocate, or alter the structural work or obstructions caused thereby, without expense to the
United States.
7. Approval of the structure is based on determinations that there would be no
obstruction to navigation. The structure may be damaged by wave wash from passing vessels.
Issuance of this permit should not be construed, as, relieving the pennittee of taking proper steps
to insure the structure and moored boats will not be damaged by wave wash.
& The authorized structure and associated activity must not interfere with the public's
right to free navigation on all navigable waters .of the.United States. No attempt will be made by
the permitfee to prevent the full and free use by the public of all navigable waters at or adjacent
to'the authorized work for reason other than safety.
9. Except as specified in the plans attached to this permit, no excavation, fill or
mechanized land -clearing activities shall take place at any time in the construction or
maintenance of thisprcject, in such a manner as to impair normal flows and circulation patterns
within waters or wetlands or to reduce the reach of waters or wetlands.
i.
3
r. ,

10. Except as authorizedby this permit or any USACE approved modification to this
permit, no excavation, fill' or mechanizeddand-clearing activities shall take place at any time in
the construction or maintenance of this project, within waters or wetlands. This permit does not
authorize temporary placement or double handling of excavated_ or fill material within waters or
wetlands outside the permitted area. This prohibition applies to all borrow and fill activities
connected with this projecf
11. All mechanized;equipment willbe'regularly inspected and maintained to prevent
contamination of waters and wetlands from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, or other toxic
materials. In the event of a'§pill of petroleum products or any other hazardous waste; the
permittee shall immediately report it to the N.C. Division of Water Resources at 1919) 733-5083,
Ext. 526 or [phone] and provisions of the North, Carolina Oil Pollution and Hazardous
Substances Control Act will be followed.
12., Unless otherwise authorized by. this permit, all fill material placed in waters or
wetlands shall be generated from an upland source and will be clean: and free of any pollutants
except in trace quantities. Metal products, organic materials (including debris from land clearing
activities), or unsightly debris will not be used.
13. If the permittee discovers any previously unknown historic or archeological remains
while accomplishing the authorized,work, he will immediately notify the Wilmington District
Engineer who will initiate the required coordination procedures.
14. The permittee shall require its contractors and/or agents to comply with the terms
and conditions of this permit in the construction and maintenanceof this project, and shall
provide each of its contractors and/or agents associated with the construction -or maintenance of
this project with a copy of this permit. A copy of this permit, including all conditions, shall be
available at the project site during construction and maintenance of this project.
15. The permittee shall employ all sedimentation and erosion control measures'
necessary to prevent an increase in sedimentation or turbidity within waters and wetlands outside
the permit area. This shall include, but is not limited to, the immediate installation of silt fencing
or similar appropriate devices around all. areas subject to soil disturbance or the movementof
earthen fill, and,the immediate stabilization of all disturbed areas. Additionally, the project must
remain in ful compliance with all aspects of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973
(North Carolina General Statutes Chapter 113A Article 4).
—IC Theaetivity. will he conducted in sucha manner as to prevent a significant increase
in turbidity outside the area of construction or construction -related discharge. Increases such that
the turbidity in the waterbody is 50 NTU's or less in all rivers not designated as trout waters by
the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (NCDEM), 25 NTU s or less in all
saltwater classes and in all lakes and reservoirs, and 10 NTU's or less in trout waters, are not
considered significant.

J
17. The permittee, upon receipt of a notice of revocation of this permit or upon its
expiration before completion of the work will, without expense to the United States and in such
time and manner as the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative may direct, restore
the water or wetland to its pre -project condition.
18, - Violations'of these conditions or violations of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act or
Section 10 of the Riveiiand Harbors.Act must be reported in writing to the Wilmington District U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers within 24 hours of the permittee's discovery of the violation.
5

It 1 •_ 11 3;_u0
Wilmington District, Corps, of Engineers
69 DarlingtomAvenue•
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403-1343
hn://www.saw.usar,e.army.mii/Missions/Re 'ug latoryPennitPro raga .g x
General Permit No. 198000291
Name ofPermittee: General -Public
Effective Date: January Ol. 2017
Expiration Date: December 31.'2021
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
GENERAL PERMIT
A general permit to do work in or affecting navigable waters. of the United States and waters of
the United States, upon recommendation of the Chief of Engineers, pursuant to Section 10 of the
Rivers and Harbors Act of March 3, 1899 (U.S.C. 403), and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(33 U.S.C. 1344), is hereby issued by authority of the Secretary of the Army by
District Engineer
U.S. Army Engineer District, Wilmington
Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403-1343
TO AUTHORIZE, THOSE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IN THE 20 COASTAL
COUNTIES RECEIVING PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
IN THE FORM OF A COASTAL AREA MANAGEMENT ACT (CAMA) PERMIT, AND/OR
A STATE DREDGE AND FILL PERMIT, AND IF REQUIRED, A WATER QUALITY
CERTIFICATION, THAT ARE OTHERWISE NOT ELIGIBLE FOR FEDERAL
AUTHORIZATION IN THE FORM OF A NATIONWIDE PERMIT OR ANOTHER
REGIONAL GENERAL PERMIT.
Operating Procedures
a. Applications,for joint state and federal authorization under this programmatic general
permit will be accepted through the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (NCDCM).
Receipt of a complete.application.by the NCDCM will initiate the States field review that will
include` a site visit and preparation of a Field Investigation Report and a state Bio-Report. The
NCDCM will forward a copy of the complete application, its Field Investigation Report and its
Bio=Report, to the appropriate Corps of Engineers field office, thereby initiating federal review of

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
APPLICANT'S NAME: Bailey and Associates, Inc. c/o Chris Bailey
PROJECT NAME: Grand View Community Boating Facility
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: 202 Summer Rest Road, adjacent to Motts Creek, and the Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway, Greenville Sound, in Wilmington, New Hanover County.
Photo Index - 2006: 22-7424, I-J, 10
Coordinates- Latitude: 34°13'11.47562"N Longitude:77°48'51.900003"WRECEIVED
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA JUN 19 2017
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit— 6/9/2017 DCM- M HD
Applicant Present — No CITY
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received — 1/6/2017 Complete — 6/9/17
6.
8.
Office — Wilmington
SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan — Wilmington/New Hanover County
Land Classification From LUP - Resource Protection (Upland), Conservation (Open Water)
(B) AEC(s) Involved: CW, PT, EW, ES
(C) Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Private Community
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing — Sewer Force Main (NEI)
Planned — N/A
(F) Type of Structures: Existing — Timber bulkhead, irrigation well, access pier, floating dock, remnant piling
Planned — Additional access pier, platforms, gazebos, floating docks, 8 additional
boat slips.
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source - N/A
HABITAT DESCRIPTION:
(A) Vegetated Wetlands (Coastal Wetlands)
(Shaded)
474 sq. ft.
(B) Non -Vegetated Wetlands
incorporated
(Open water
2,092 sq. ft.
(C) Other (Highground) Disposal Site
(D) Total Area Disturbed: —2,566 sq. ft. (-0.059 acres)
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: "SB" Wrightsville Recreational Area Open: No
PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to expand an existing docking facility and construct an observation
platform adjacent to Motts Creek and the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (AIW W).

Bailey and Associates c/o Christopher Bailey -Grand View Community Docking Facility RECEIVED
Page 2 JUN 19 2017
9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DCM- MHD CITY
The project site is located at 202 Summer Rest Road (NCSR 1417), across from the old "Babies Hospital" location,
adjacent to Motts Creek, and the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (AIWW), Greenville Sound, Wilmington, in New
Hanover County. To locate the site from the Wilmington Regional Office (WiRO) take US Hwy 74/76 towards
Wrightsville Beach just before crossing the drawbridge to Wrightsville Beach. The property is approximately 150 feet
north of the US Hwy 74/76 drawbridge to Wrightsville Beach and is directly across the AIWW from the NC Wildlife
Resources Commission (NCWRC) public boat ramp at Wrightsville Beach, approximately 650'east.
The project site is bordered to the north by Motts Creek which functions as the connection to a tidal pond/embayment
on the west side of Summer Rest Road adjacent to the old "Babies Hospital" site, which an existing box culvert bridges
this connection for the street. The applicant developed the "Babies Hospital" property located at 7205 Wrightsville
Ave. into the new Grand View mixed use apartments which include III residential units through State Permit
No. 87-07. To the southwest, the project is bordered by Wrightsville Beach drawbridge and 150' wide right-of-way
owned by the NC Department of Transportation.
The application states that project site is approximately 0.85 acres or 37,026 sq. ft. with approximately 476 linear feet
(LF) of shoreline frontage and averages 2' above normal high water (NHW). The property is peculiar with the majority
of the shoreline of the property bordering Molts Creek, which is approximately 130' in width at the narrowest point at
the mouth. A large oyster -rock is located at the mouth of the creek on the north side. There are existing community and
private docking facilities with associated boat basins to the north of the property along Summer Rest Road (State
Permits No. 174-00, No.165-90 & No. 241-89). These facilities connect directly to the AIWW via an access channel at
the mouth of Motts Creek. The boat basins for these docking facilities along with the access channel have been
excavated periodically through the years to maintain adequate water depths. The adjacent docking facility to the north
was authorized an associated boat basin and access channel to the AIWW through State Permit No.174-00, which was
issued to the previous property owner (B. Smith). The final project depth of the previously authorized access channel is
-6.0' at mean low water (MLW).
The marsh area, between the highground along Summer Rest Road, Motts Creek to the north, and the boat basins to
the north, consists of Smooth Cordgrass (Spartina alternii lora), ranging from 40' to 120' in width. At the transition to
highground, there is coastal marsh vegetation, intermixed with Spike Grass (Distichlis spicata), Sea Oxeye (Borrichia
frutescens), Sea Lavender (Limonium, spp.), Saltwort (Salicornia, spp.), and Salt Meadow Grass (Spartina patens).
Shrubs including; Marsh -Elder (Iva frutescens), Grounsel-Bush (Baccharus halimifolia), and Wax Myrtle (Myrica
cerifera) complete the transition to the highground.
There is an existing timber bulkhead along the western portion of the property that stabilizes the highground area
adjacent to Summer Rest Road, which was authorized under CAMA General Permit No. 51962-D. Waterward of the
timber bulkhead is a 6' by 652' fixed elevated access pier that extends towards the AIWW, which runs parallel to Molts
Creek towards the AIWW. The access pier terminates onto a 6' by 66' floating dock via an access ramp that runs
parallel to the AIWW. Waterward of the existing floating dock, approximately 40' south are remnant pilings from an
abandoned pier and approximately 85' waterward of the existing floating dock on the western side is the timber fender
system for the AIWW under the Wrightsville Beach drawbridge. This facility was authorized through State Permit No.
84-01.
There is an existing sewer force main, which is known as the Northeast Interceptor (NEI), which crosses property. The
Town of Wrightsville Beach obtained State Permit No. 100-78 and 106-78 for the approximately 800 LF 14"
subaqueous line on July 10, 1978, which is located on the north side of the drawbridge to the Town of Wrightsville
Beach. It appears through the file review, the Town of Wrightsville Beach obtained an easement from the State on May
27,1982 for the NEI within four (4) waterbodies, which includes this section of the AIWW north ofthe US Hwy 74/76.
Wastewater is collected and pumped under the AIWW through segment # 1 of the NEI to the Cape Fear Public Utility

RECEIVED
Bailey and Associates c/o Christopher Bailey- Grand View Community Doclung Wc
Page DCM- MHD CITY
Authority (CFPUA) pump station and ultimately to the CFPUA's Southside Wastewater Treatment Plant.
The application states that the location of the NEI was surveyed on 12/10/2007 and resurveyed in 8/2015 by Johnnie
Williams Land Surveying PC. There also appears to be telephone lines that were located on the referenced revised
drawings dated 06/26/2001 in State Permit No. 84-01 application.
The existing docking facility was authorized for up to two (2) vessels through State Permit No. 84-01, which was
originally issued to CGRS Enterprises, LLC on 07/3/2001. The application for State Permit No. 84-01 depicted that an
approximate 50' section of the authorized access pier and the floating dock in the location of the NEI were designed to
be bolted for removal for required maintenance. The location of the access pier in relation to the NEI was addressed
under condition No. 7 of State Permit No. 84-01 and referenced revised drawings dated 06/26/2001. The existing
docking facility appears to meet the 80' setback from the USACE AIW W federal channel and the N.C. Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) 150' right-of-way from the bridge. Further, the referenced drawings for State Permit No.
84-01 indicate that the northern riparian corridor line was referenced from the centerline of Motts Creek channel.
State Permit No. 84-01 was transferred to Bailey and Associates, Inc. on 05/04/2006 and last modified on 05/27/2008
for relocation of the authorized access pier to the south to accommodate the authorized two vessels, and the
construction of a 30' in length by 20' in width partially covered platform to be constructed on the northern side of the
relocated access pier. The platform location under this modification was authorized just on the waterward side of the
coastal wetlands boundary and on the southern side of the existing NEI sewer line. The NEI was partially located in the
field on 12/10/2007 by the acting agent at the time of the modification request. The portion of the located alignment of
the NEI was depicted on the attached drawings for the modification request and was taken from the survey, and
construction of the existing access pier currently spans over the NEI. To date the authorized partially covered platform
has not been constructed. State Permit No. 84-01 was due to expire on 12/31 /2008, however, State Permit No. 84-01
was subject to extension by the Session Law 2009406, as amended by Session Law 2010-177, the Permit Extension
Act. State Permit No. 84-01 expired on 12/31/2012.
State Permit No. 13-86 was issued to a previous property owner (Consolidated Ventures Corporation c/o David
W inner) on 11/19/1986 for a ten (10) slip docking facility at this property, which included excavation for a boat basin.
Based on a file review, it appears the applicant received a Special Use Permit (No. 5-22 7/84) from New Hanover
County. The field investigation report stated that the anchor pilings would be set 20' to either side of the force main in
order to meet conditions of the special use permit. Also the pier would be bolted together in such a manner that it can
be removed in the event the force main needs repair. Permit Condition No. 9 of State Permit No. 13-86 addressed the
existing sewer line and reads: "The area over the 14"force main shall not be excavated unless the applicants can
verb that the line will have 4' cover remaining." The proposed docking facility ran parallel to Motts Creek and the
traditional navigation to the AIW W from the private docking facilities to the northwest along Summer Rest Road and to
the 80' setback requirement from the AIWW channel. State Permit No. 13-86 expired on 12/31/1989 and the
construction of this docking facility was abandoned. The only evidence of the docking facility is the remnant pilings
from an abandoned pier. Further, these existing pilings at this location appear to be present in the review of historical
NCDOT 1989 aerial photography.
There have been other CAMA Major Permit applications by the current applicant submitted for expansion of the
existing docking facility over the last five years or so, which have been withdrawn. The most recent previous permit
application submitted in 6/2015 was withdrawn by request by the applicant dated received by this office on 2/29/2016.
The current application was submitted on 1/06/17 and an add information letter was sent to the applicant on January 31,
2017. A scoping meeting was held with the applicant and agent at the Wilmington Regional Office (WiRO) on
2/16/17. The applicant responded to the January add information request on 4/12/17 and another additional
information request was sent 4/21/17. The applicant responded on 5/30/17 and minor changes were made to the
application before it was found complete on 6/9/17.

Bailey and Associates c/o Christopher Bailey- Grand View Community Docking Facility
Page 4
The New Hanover County and the City of Wilmington 2006 Land Use Plan Update classifies adjacent waters as
Conservation, and the adjacent high ground portion of the project area as Resource Protection. The waters of the Molts
Creek and the AIW W in the project area are classified SB (Wrightsville Recreational Area) by the Division of Water
Resources. They are NOT designated as a Primary Nursery Area by the N.C. Divisitqel er[)and they are
CLOSED to the harvest of shellfish.
PROPOSED PROJECT: JUN 19 2017
The applicant proposes to expand an existing docking facility to accommodate 1 MM-%UMSs nQLT ddditional
fixed pier and gazebo adjacent to Motts Creek and the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (AIW W). The application states
that approximately 93' of the existing access pier would be removed and replaced with a 6' by 58' new fixed pier with
the same alignment towards the AIW W. At the end ofthe new 6' by 58' fixed elevated pier an access ramp would lead
onto a new 6' by 57' main floating dock extending towards the AIW W with a parallel alignment to the 150' NCDOT
Right -of -Way at an approximate water depth ranging from -2.2' to -7.6' at MLW. The main floating dock would
terminate at the existing floating dock, measuring approximately 66' in length by 6' in width at a water depth of 7.6' at
MLW creating an "L-shaped" configuration towards the north at the existing northern piling. At the northern end of
the 6' by 66' floating dock water depth measures approximately 9.5' at MLW. Based on the application, the existing
force main is located approximately 4.2' directly below the substrate underneath the floating dock. Furthermore, the
application drawings depicts the existing floating dock is currently and would continue to be located partially within the
extension of the access channel to the private docking facility to the north.
The applicant proposes two additional floating docks for boat dockage. One floating dock, measuring 6' by 32', would
be attached approximately 29' from the northern end of the 6' by 66' float at approximately -7.0' water depth at MLW,
and have an east to west orientation. The second floating dock, measuring 6' by 30' with an approximate water depth
range of-3.5' to -7.0' at MLW, would be attached approximately 13' from the west end of the main floating dock and
have a north to south orientation. The applicant proposes a 6' by 6' floating platform at -4.5' water depth at MLW,
located 2 P from the west end of the main floating dock on the north side of the float. An access ramp would lead from
the float landing to a 6' by 8' fixed platform. The 6' by 8' fixed platform would be connected to a 20' by 20' gazebo.
The application states that the new docking facility would accommodate up to 10 permanent slips (See Sheet 5 of 10).
Located approximately 150' from Summer Rest Road an additional access pier, measuring approximately 79' in length
by 6' in width would extend over the coastal marsh from the northern side of the existing access pier into Motts Creek.
The pier would terminate into a fully covered platform, measuring approximately 20' in length by 9' in width, located
over open water (See Sheets 3,4,6 of 10).
10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS:
The proposed marina docking facility construction would incorporate 2,092 sq. ft. of Estuarine Waters and Public Trust
Area, which includes an area currently usurped by a section of the existing access pier and floating dock. The proposed
new piers and uncovered platforms would shade approximately 474 sq. ft. of coastal wetlands, vegetated primarily with
Smooth Cordgrass (Spartina altem j7ora). The application states that the proposed docking facility would accommodate
up to 10 slips for mixed type vessels ranging from 8' to 66' in length. The proposed structures appear to be designed to
avoid the NEI. The application shows the NEI ranges from 2.0' to 4.2' below the substrate/mud within the project area
(Sheets 2-5, and 7 of 10). Water depth in the location of the NEI and proposed floating dock crossing ranges from
approximately-8' to -9' @ MLW. The vessel use of the proposed marina could potentially cause additional erosion
within the NEI due to propeller wash, and could expose the NEI to potential damage. The application states that prior to
the construction, a field marking of the NEI would be performed by a professional utilities location company to assure
this separation. Based on the submitted drawings, the proposed pilings for the associated structures would maintain a
minimum 19' distance from the existing force main. It also appears that a portion of the new marina docking facility

Bailey and Associates c/o Christopher Bailey- Grand View Community Docking Facility
Page 5
would be located within an easement from the State to the Town of Wrightsville Beach for the existing sewer force
main.
The proposed marina structures would extend approximately 124' into a waterbody, which measures approximately
497' across (AIWW). The proposed platform into Motts Creek would extend approximately 9' into a waterbody
measuring 49' across, which all structures would conform with the 1 /4 width of the waterbody. The proposed marina
docking facility appears to meet the required 80' setback from the USACE AIWW federal channel. Based on the
provided drawings, the southern portion of the proposed marina docking facility would not encroach into the N.C.
Department of Transportation (NCDOT) 150' right-of-way from US Hwy 74/76.
The proposed marina docking facility would not encroach into the adjacent 15' riparian corridor setback requirement to
the south of the project, which was established in the application under State Permit No. 84-01. As stated, the
referenced drawings to State Permit No. 84-01 for the existing facility on the property indicated that the northern
riparian corridor line was measured from the centerline of the Motts Creek channel. The proposed marina docking
facility would be located outside the footprint of the previously authorized docking facility under State Permit No. 84-
01. The drawings for State Permit No. 13-86, which was issued to Consolidated Ventures Corporation on the same
property for a 10 (ten) slip docking facility, did not locate a northern riparian line. Due to the peculiar shoreline
configurations in this area of Motts Creek and the AIWW a traditional perpendicular alignment could not be achieved
for a riparian corridor and associated setback. It appears that the intent of the previously authorized docking facilities
for this property was to prevent structures within the established access channel for the existing docking facilities along
Summer Rest Road and the AIWW. Rules 15A NCAC 07H.0208(b) Specific Use Standards (6)(I) states: "When
shoreline configuration is such that aperpendicular alignment cannot be achieved, the pier shall be aligned to meet
the intent ofthis Rule to the maximum extent practicable as determined by the Division of Coastal Management".
The application package for State Permit No. 174-00, which was issued on November 14, 2000, and was then renewed
and modified on January 19, 2006 to the adjacent property owner to the north at the time (Smith), for the existing
private docking facility and associated boat basin and access channel, contained a notarized authorization from the
Summer Rest Landing Yacht Club Owners Association, Inc., which was the adjacent riparian property owner to the
north, which allowed Smith's facility to extend the into the adjacent riparian corridor.
Based on the proximity of this proposed marina docking facility to the existing private docking facilities to the north
along Summer Rest Road, which connect directly to the AIWW via an access channel at the mouth of Molts Creek, and
the NCWRC public boat ramp at Wrightsville Beach, the proposed marina docking facility could potentially impede
and congest the traditional navigation in the area of the AIWW. This area of the AIWW can be very congested during
the summer due to larger vessels sitting idle waiting for the drawbridge to open and boaters trying to launch and
retrieve smaller vessels at the NCWRC public boat ramp located at Wrightsville Beach.
RECEIVED
JUN 19 2017
DCM- MHD CITY
Submitted by: Brooks R. Surgan Date: 6/14/2017 Office: Wilmington

k07A
Tammy Theusch Beasley
Register of Deeds
New Hanover County, NC
Electronically Recorded
2013 Nov 21 12:49 PM RE Excise Tax:$0.00
Book: 5783 Page: 2406 Fee: $26.00
Instrument Number:2013040924
Non -Standard Fee: $0.00
This instrument was prepared by l anier, Fountain & Cenuzi,. R r► C C' ��D
a licensed North Carolina Attorney. Delinquent taxes, Warty, ` C
to be paid by the closing attorney to the New Harwvcr CoruoyTax
Collector upon disbursement of closing proceeds. JUN
rY 19 2017
CCM_ MHD CITY
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
Excise Tax: $0.00
Parcel Identifier No. nos714M2-003-Mo 1105714-e02-4)o4-000:&495714-904-012-000 Verified by County
onthe __ day of. 2013-
By: --
MsiilBax to:_ Gretni Yiew HoldmpA LLC, PO Box 400, Jacksonville, NC 2tt54 t
This instrument was prepared by:Lanier, Fountain & CeruzzL 114 Old Bridge Street, Jacksonville, NC 28540
Brief doscriotion for the index:
THIS DEED made this .;L ! f doy afNovember, 2013, by and between
BAELEY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.,
A North Carolina Corporation
405-D Western Boulevard
Jacksonville, NC 28MO
GRAND VIEW HOLDINGS, LLC
A North Carolbut Iidted inability cobrpany
PO Box 400
Jaclrsonvilk, NC 28541
Enter in appropriate block for each Grantor and Grantee: name, mailing address, and, if appropriate, character of entity, e.g.
corporation or partnership.
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors,.and assigns, and shall include
singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context.
W ITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt ofwhich is hereby acknowledged, has and
by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee in fee simple, all that certain lot or panel of land situated in
Harnett Township, New Hanover County, North Carolina and more particularly described as follows:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set out herein.
Submitted electronically by Lanier, Fountain & Cen=i in compliance with North Carolina statutes governing
recordable documents and the terms of the submitter agreement with the New Hanover County Register of Deeds.
NC Bar Association Form No. 3 ® 1916, Revised 0111=0
Printed by Agreement with the NC Bar Assaciatiae
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
APR 12 Z017

The property hereitrabove described was acquired by Grantor by instrument recorded in Book 2424, page 570; Book $264, page 2271;
and Book 5031, page 135(l.
All or a portion of the property herein conveyed __ includes or _ X_ . does not include the primary residence of a Grantor.
A map showing the above described property is recorded in Plat Book page
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging to the Grantee in
fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized ofthe premises in fee simple, has the right to convey the same in fee
simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and that Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the
lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, other than the fcllowingexceptions: Easements and restrictions appearing of record.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has duly executed the foregoing as of the day and year first above written.
ASSOCBAUZZAND TES. INC.
ntityName)
By:
L�
Priat/Type Name & Title. Christopher W. Bailey. President
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF ONSLOW
I certify that the following person personally appeared before me this day, acknowledging to me that he signed the
foregoing document in the capacity indicated thereon: _ Christopher W Bailey
CIA -
Date: Novembera 1, 2013.
��11rtvv
O.n-2�C
My Commission EzpiresjA-1o1ap(aNotary Public _
(SEAL)
Donna L. Haskell
Notary Public
nnslow County, NC
NC Bar Association Foan No. 3 01476, Revised ©1/1/20I0
Primed by Atiraenimt with the NC Bar Association
RECEIVED
JUN 19 2017
DCM- MHD CITY
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
APR 12 2017

wL-
Exhibit A
Description of Property RECEIVE
TRACT A (RO5714-002-003.000 and R05714-002-004-000) JUN 19 2017
Commencing at a miag nail set at the centerline intersection of NDM1 st
Road) with U.S. Highway No. 74; thence leaving said intersection, north 24 ddegrees- 3 r es
338 seconds. east 74.33 feet to an existing railroad spike on the northern right-of-way line of U.S..
Highway No. 74, said railroad spike being THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence from
the above described point of beginning and along said rigbt-ofway line, north 56 degrees 09
minutes 36 seconds west 157.59 feet to an existing railroad spike; thence north 63 degrees 41
minutes 57 seconds west 71.14 feet to a I % inch existing iron pipe four inches above ground;
thence north 56 degrees 30 minutes 30 seconds west 100.03 feet to a 1 14 inch existing iron pipe
one inch below ground; thence north 42 degrees 43 minutes 19 seconds west 74.11 feet to an
existing right-of-way monument; thence north 56 degrees 59 minutes 15 seconds west 12.23 feet
to a 1 t/2 inch existing iron pipe one inch above ground; thence north 57 degrees 00 minutes 36
seconds west 154.27 feet to a 54 inch iron stake set two inches below grounds thence leaving the
right-of-way line of U.S. Highway No. 74, north 16 degrees 01 minutes 48 seconds west 53.48
feet to a 5/8 inch iron stake set two inches below ground on the southeastern right-of-way line of
N.C.S.11- 1415 (Canal Drive,); thence along said right-of-way line, north 32 degrees 42 minutes
35 seconds east 373.47 feet to an existing iron pipe; thence leaving said right-of-way line, and
with the southwestern line of the Ronald Gray Miller, Sr. property recorded in Deed Book 3043
page 54, south 32 degrees 05 minutes 07 seconds east 171,43 feet to an existing iron stake;
thence continuing with said Miller line and with the southwestern line of the Bailey and
Associates, Inc. property recorded in Deed Book 5528 page 511, south 21 degrees 58 minutes 34
seconds east 23.48 feet to a 5/8 inch iron stake set; thence south 77 degrees 05 minutes 37
seconds east 24,48 feet to a point; thence north 83 degrees 32 minutes 41 seconds east 40.99 feet
to a point; thence north 86 degrees 22 minutes 40 seconds east 36.48 feet to a point; thence south
58 degrees 49 minutes 50 seconds east 49,65 feet to a point; thence south 45 degrees 50 minutes
03 seconds east 16.43 feet to a point; thence south 07 dogrecs 44 minutes 36 seconds east 21.87
feet to a point; thence along the high water mark of Motts Creek (the actual high water mark
being; the actual property line), south 12 degrees 45 minutes 56 seconds west 15.79 feet to a
point; thence south 05 degrees 31 minutes 43 seconds east 25.25 feet to a point; thence south 12
degrees 51 minutes 39 seconds east 18.53 feet to a point; thence south 04 degrees 39 minutes 17
seconds west 25.40 feet to a point; thence south 02 degrees 36 minutes 49 seconds east ,23S6
feet to a point; thence south 07 degrees 43 minutes 49 seconds east 40Al feet to a point; thence
south 24 degrees 20 minutes 42 seconds west 14.10 feet to a point; thence south 12 degrees 13
minutes 10 seconds east 14.29 feet to a point; thence south 12 degrees 30 minutes 12 seconds
east 28.93 feet'to a point; theme south 29 degrees 55 minutes 47 seconds east 28.10 feet to a
point; thence south t 1 degrees 12 minutes 19 seconds cast 14,55 feet to a point, thence south 14
degrees 44 minutes 20 seconds east 33.05 to a point; thence south 34 degrees 46 minutes 43
seconds east 8.87 feet to a point, thence south 34 degrees 20 minutes 22 seconds cast 26.99 feet
to a point; thence south 42 degrees 01 minutes 53 seconds east 21.75 feet to a point; thence south
45 degrees 05 minutes 31 seconds east 17,46 feet to a point; thence south 74 degrees 46 minutes
12 seconds east 13.20 feet to a point; thence south 60 degrees 31 minutes 33 seconds east 55.01
feet to point; thence south 77 degrees 15 minutes 56 seconds east 13.65 feet to a point; thence
south 75 degrees 28 minutes 06 seconds east 15.91 feet to a point; thence south 62 degrees 27
minutes 1.9 seconds east 11.34 feet to a 5/8 inch irons stake set one inch below ground of the
northern right-of-way line ofN.C,&R. 1417; thence along said right-of-way line, south 56
degrees 29 minutes 18 seconds west 164.05 feet to a mag nail set; thence north 7$ degreesRHEIVED
minutes 12 seconds west 23-95 feet to the point and place of beginning. DCM WILMINGTON, NC
APR 12 2017

Exhibit "A" — page 2
Containing 4,39 acres and being all of that property recorded in Deed Book 2424 page 570 and
being all of that property recorded in Deed Book 5264, page 2271 of New Hanover County
Registry as shown on Recombination Plat For: Grand View Holdings, LLC recorded in Map
Book _ , Page , New Hanover County Registry.
It is the intent of the Grantor to combine the two parcels described above (1105714-002-003-000 and
R05714-002-004-000) into one tax parcel.
TRACT II
Commencing at a mag nail set at the centerline intersection of N.C.S.R. 1417 (Summer Rest
Road) with U.S. Highway No. 74; thence Leaving said intersection, north 58 degrees 06 minutes
38 seconds cast 263.75 feet to a survey spike set in the centerline of N.C.S.R. 1417 over a
bridge; thence leaving the centerline of N.C.S.R. 1417, south 38 degrees 39 minutes 02 seconds
west 94.49 feet to an existing iron stake on the southeastern right-of-way line of N.C.S.R. 1417,
said stake being THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence from the above described point
of beginning and along said right-of-way line, north 56 degrees 12 minutes 34 seconds east 80.14
feet to an existing iron stake; thence leaving said right-of-way line and along the approximate
mean low water mark of Motts Creek (the actual low water mark being the actual property line)
south 07 degrees 33 minutes 00 seconds east 16.14 feet to a point; thence south 20 degrees 21
minutes 35 seconds east 31.93 feet to a point; thence south 66 degrees 16 minutes 28 seconds
east 35.40 feet to a point; thence north 72 degrees 40 minutes 23 seconds east 57.29 feet to a
point; thence south 76 degrees 54 minutes 02 seconds cast 42.80 feet to a point; thence south 47
degrees 35 minutes 09 seconds east 105.78 feet to a point; thence south 32 degrees 15 minutes 59
seconds east 28.39 feet to a point; thence south 73 degrees 51 minutes 31 seconds east 36.83 feet
to a point; thence south 20 degrees 26 minutes 56 seconds west 20.99 feet to a point; thence
south 62 degrees 39 minutes 32 seconds east 15.98 feet to a point; thence south 12 degrees 46
minutes 04 seconds east 51.10 feet to a point; thence south 31 degrees 21 minutes 14 seconds
east 39.53 feet to a point; thence south 78 degrees 42 minutes 18 seconds east 34.55 feet to a
point, thence south 39 degrees 12 minutes 08 seconds east 13.69 feet to an existing iron pipe on
the northern right-of-way line of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; thence along said right-of-
way line, south 85 degrees 39 minutes 03 seconds west 79.00 feet to a point; thence leaving said
right-of-way line and with the northeastern right-of-way line of the North Carolina Department
of Transportation property; north 52 degrees 55 minutes 51 seconds west 51.80 feet to an
existing right-of-way monument, thence north 53 degrees 58 minutes 02 seconds west 373.36
feet to the point and place of beginning.
Containing 0.845 acres and being all of that property recorded in Deed Book A eL&'wa..l V of D
New Hanover County Registry. 1(C li C V C
JUN 19 2017
DCM- MHD CITY
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON. NC
APR 12 2017

z 1111 11 11111
FOR REGISTRRTION REGISTER OF DEEDS
NEW HANNOVERPCOUNTTN NC
2N6 JUN 02 N:31:65 PM
BK:5031 P0350-1353 FEE:$20.00
K REV STA1N:f8RA
INN 1200319
WE PREPARED THE DEED IN THIS TRANSACTION, BUT WE MADE NO
EXAMINATION OF TITLE AND WE EXPRESS NO OPINION ON TITLE TO THE
PROPERTY.
Prepared by:
Excise Tax: $950.00
NANCY M. GUYTON, Attorney at Law
321 North Front Street, Wilmington, NC 28401
TAX PARCEL No: R05714-004-012-000
R05714-004-019-000
Brief description for the index:
Summers Rest Road Tract
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
THIS DEED, made this 30th day of May, 2006 by and between, CGRS
Enterprises, LLC herein, whether one or more, called GRANTORS, and Bailey and
Associates, Inc., whose mailing address is P.O. Box 400, Jacksonville, NC 28540
herein, whether one or more, called GRANTEES.
WITNESSETH THAT:
THE GRANTORS, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00)
and other valuable considerations to them in hand paid by the GRANTEES, the receipt
whereof is hereby acknowledged, have bargained and sold, and by these presents do
hereby bargain, sell and convey unto GRANTEES and their heirs, successors, and
assigns forever, all that certain real property located in New Hanover County, North
Carolina, described as follows:
BEGINNING at an old iron rod which is located S 110 28' 88" E
29.04 feet from the centerline of SR #1417 Summer Rest Road
and being North 150 feet from U.S. Hwy. 74 & 76 as shown on the
plat of survey hereinafter referred to and running thence along and RECEIVED
with the eastern line of Summer Rest RoAEG '� 82.10 DCM WILMINGTON NC
JUN 19 2017 JAN
DCM- MHD CITY

feet to a point in the eastern line of Summer Rest Road; thence
along and with the low water line of Mott's Creek the following
courses and distances: S 16" 56' 50" E 41.00 feet; S 600 06' 10" E
23.10 feet; N 85" 27' 07" E 42.63 feet; N 76° 02' 55" E 33.79 feet;
thence S 77" 45' 03" E 29.25 feet; thence S 64° 50' 20" E 39.22
feet; thence S 430 40' 13" E 76.49 feet; thence S 530 43' 57" E
67.01 feet; thence S 420 02' 25" E 98.92 feet; thence S 9° 40' 26"
E 59.23 feet; thence S 850 34' 52" W 78.97 feet to a point: thence
N 54" 02' 13" W 35.77 feet to an old iron pipe; thence N 540 02'
13" W 16.80 feet to an old right-of-way monument (disturbed);
thence N 54" 02' 13" W 372.56 feet to an old iron rod, the point
and place of BEGINNING as per map of survey for Summer Rest
Associates prepared by Sherwin D. Cribb, N.C. Registered Land
Surveyor, #L-1099 dated October, 1984 to which reference is
hereby made for a more particular description thereof.
The property hereinabove described was acquired by Grantor by instrument
recorded in Deed Book 1938 Page 0761, of the New Hanover County Registry.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above granted and described property, together
with all and singular, the rights, privileges, easements, tenements and appurtenances
thereunto belonging, or in anywise appertaining unto the said GRANTEES, their heirs,
successors, and assigns, in fee simple, forever.
AND THE GRANTORS, for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, do
covenant to and with the said GRANTEES, their heirs, successors, and assigns, that
GRANTORS are seized in fee of the above granted and described property, that
GRANTORS have good right to sell and convey the same in fee simple, that the same
is free and clear from any and all restrictions, easements or encumbrances, and that
GRANTORS will and their heirs, successors, and assigns will warrant and defend the
title to the same against the lawful claims and demands of any and all persons
whomsoever except for the exceptions hereinafter stated.
Title to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following exceptions:
1. All easements, rights of way and restrictions of record.
2. All governmental land use statutes, ordinances or regulations, including,
zoning, building and subdivision regulations.
3. Ad valorem taxes for current and subsequent years.
4. NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING HEREIN TO THE CONTRARY, NO
WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND ARE MADE WITH RESPECT TO ANY
PORTION OF THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN WHICH LIES
BELOW THE MEAN HIGH WATER LINE.
RECEIVED RECEIVED
JUN 19 2017 DCM WILMINGTON, NO
JAN 0 6 2017
DCM- MHD CITY

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the said GRANTORS have hereunto set
their hands and seals as of the day and year first above written.
CGRS Enterprises, LLC /�
By: ram,, .''51 -— (SEAL)
Charles N. Garrett, Member
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF NEW HANOVER
1 certify that the following person(s) personally appeared before me this day,
and I have personal knowledge of the identity of the principal(s); each acknowledging
to me that her or she voluntarily signed the foregoing document for the purpose
stated therein and in the capacity indicated: Charles N. Garrett, Jr..
(Official Seal) Print Name: L. i L_, Notary Public
My commission expires: I() --j (n- 2610
RECEIVED
JUN 19 2017
DCM- MHD CITY
RECEIVED
OCM WILMINGTON, NC
,JAN 0 6 2017

REBECCA P. SMITH
REGISTER OF DEEDS, NEW HANOVER
216 NORTH SECOND STREET
WILMINGTON, NC 28401
♦R}}f}lH1N}}H!}}}4}f}!}}H}}}}A}}YH!}}}HHHf iMfv1[Hf YHH}HYiM.Hf If!}f1M!}R}IRHYHif}4}HfRRHFR4H}MitHf
Filed For Registration: 06102/2006 01:31:05 PM
Book: RE 5031 Page: 1350.1353
Document No.: 2006031382
DEED 4 PGS $20.00
NC REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX: $950.00
Recorder: PHELPS, MICAH
State of North Carolina, County of New Hanover
RECEIVED
JUN 19 2017
DCM- MHD CITY
YELLOW PROBATE SHEET IS A VITAL PART OF YOUR RECORDED DOCUMENT.
PLEASE RETAIN WITH ORIGINAL DOCUMENT AND SUBMIT FOR RE-RECORDING.
*2006031382* RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON �C
2006031382

CAMA Major Permit Application- Project Narrative — revised May 26, 2017
Grand View Community Boating Facility
202 Summer Rest Road
Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina
Grandview Holdings, LLC, Applicant
Land Management Group, Inc. (LMG), Agent
Existing Conditions
RECEIVED
JUN 19 2017
DCM- MHD CITY
Grand View Holdings, LLC, is the owner of New Hanover County parcel R05714-004-012-000. The
property is located at 202 Summer Rest Road, Wilmington, and abuts Motts Creek and the Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway (AIWW) just north of the Wrightsville Beach Bridge. Upland portions of the
property are located within the City of Wilmington. Riparian areas below mean high water are
within the jurisdiction of New Hanover County. The property features riparian access to Mott's
Creek on the northern side of the property and to the AIWW on the eastern side of the property.
There are 476-linear feet of shoreline along normal high water, as flagged by LMG, within the
deeded property boundaries.
The property currently contains a 652-ft long fixed pier which accesses a 66-ft long floating dock (2
boat slips) parallel to the AIWW (CAMA Permit 84-01). The existing floating dock is located
approximately 12' landward of the quarter waterbody setback, which is more restrictive than the 80'
federal setback off the AIWW channel in this location. Deeded property boundaries for the parcel
include a mean low water and a mean high water line surveyed at the time of recordation in 1984.
Since the low water line was shown on the 1984 survey, a search for any submerged land claims
was conducted to determine whether the applicant or any adjacent parcel had a legal submerged
land claim. The NCDENR, Division of Marine Fisheries, database for "Submerged Land Claims
Recognized under NCGS 113-205" was reviewed. Neither the subject property nor the directly
adjacent northern property was shown to have any recognized submerged land claims. More
recent mean high water, normal high water, and mean low water contours are provided in the
application materials in addition to the deeded boundaries (which are provided for reference only).
The AIWW along this property is designated by the NC Environmental Management Commission
(EMC) as SB waters (Index # 18-87-24). The property is located across the AIWW from the public
boat ramp at Wrightsville Beach. No waters adjacent to the property are mapped as Primary
Nursery Area (PNA), and the adjacent waters are closed to shellfishing for human consumption.
Proposed Project
Grand View Holdings, LLC is proposing to expand the existing Grand View docking facility to
provide a fixed pier and crabbing dock on Mott's Creek and to expand side -to dockage along the
AIWW to accommodate a total of ten boats. The existing 66' long floating dock will be replaced,
but will be slightly re -aligned (pivoted) on its northem-most piling which will remain in place. Three
new floating dock sections will be added along with a 20' by 20' fixed gazebo. The existing fixed
pier will continue to provide access, and approximately 93' of the pier will be removed for
placement of the floating docks. New structures on the AIWW will include: (1) a 6' x 58' section of
new fixed access pier, (2) a 6' x 52' floating dock, (3) a 6' x 30' floating dock, (4) a 6' x 32' floating
dock, a 20' x 20' fixed gazebo, two ramp platforms and two ramps. The proposed dockage
Grand View Community Boating Facility, Bailey and Associates, Inc. RECEIVED
CAMA Major Permit Application, Project Narrative, revised May 26, 2017 DCM WILMINGTON, NC
1 MAY 3 0

structures are located approximately 72' south of the end of the permitted dredged channel serving
the neighboring slips located off Summer Rest Road. Proposed docking structures will not interfere
with boating access to or from those slips located approximately 245' away. In addition, the outer
structures of the Wrightsville Beach public boat ramp are located approximately 328' away across
the AIWW from the proposed (and existing) docking structures and no navigation interference will
occur. A 9' x 20' fixed, covered platform is proposed on Mott's Creek and will be accessed by a
new 6' wide fixed pier extending 79' from the existing fixed pier. The crabbing dock to be located in
the upper reach of Motts Creek will not extend beyond the %waterbody distance or occupy the
channel portion of the creek.
The side -to dockage provided by the floating dock system would serve a maximum of ten boats.
Boat sizes are unknown and there are no designated individual slips. It is anticipated that a mix of
recreational boat sizes will occupy the docks. All slips would serve residential units within the
Grand View mixed -use development currently located at 7205 Wrightsville Avenue (New Hanover
County parcel R05714-002-003-000). The residential component of the mixed -use redevelopment
of the former Babies Hospital site contains 111 residential units. The proposed boat slips are within
walking distance of the residential units, and no parking at the waterfront parcel will be necessary.
No upland work is proposed in this application.
Hydrographic surveys were completed by TI Coastal in September 2014 and March 2017 for the
overall project area and are relative to mean low water. Water depths within the docking area
range from -2' to -8' mean low water. No dredging is proposed.
The Northeast Interceptor (NEI) sewer force main was buried within the riparian corridor of this
property prior to the permitting and construction of the existing pier and floating dock. The NEI
serves the Town of Wrightsville Beach and is controlled by the Cape Fear Public Utility Authority.
New structural pilings for the docks have been placed to avoid the surveyed position of the buried
force main by a minimum of 19'. In addition, prior to construction, a field marking of the force main
will be performed by a professional utilities location company to assure separation. A detachment
point has been identified on the existing floating dock which is currently sited over the buried NEI.
This detachment point indicates the point from which the northern end of the dock could be
temporarily moved to allow for vertical maintenance access to the NEI. The applicant is willing to
offer an easement to the Town of Wrightsville Beach to allow access for maintenance and repair of
the existing NEI line in its current location, subject to reasonable terms and conditions.
No fuel or maintenance services would be provided, and no overnight or live-aboards would be
allowed by the rental agreement and/or community rules and restrictions. Seapath Yacht Club
provides a pump -out and is located on Harbor Island (Wrightsville Beach) less than 1 mile by water
from the project site.
RECEIVED
JUN 19 2017
DCM- MHD CITY
i-qECEIVED
Grand View Community Boating Facility, Bailey and Associates, Inc. DCM WILMINGTON, NC
CAMA Major Permit Application, Project Narrative, revised May 26, 2017
2 MAY 3 0 2017

DCM MP- I
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
(last revised 12/27/06) 0
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1. Primary Applicant/ Landownerinformation
Business Name
Project Name (d applicable)
Grand View Holdings, LLC clo Bailey And Associates, Inc.
Grand View Community Boating Facility
Applicant 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
cto Mr. Chris
Bailey
Applicant 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
tl additional applicants, please attach an additional pages) with names listed.
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
P.O. Box
400
Jacksonville
NC
ZIP
Country
Phone No.
FAX No.
28541
USA
910-346-8443 ext.
910-346-8637
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
cwbailey@baileyandassociates. biz
4lliiyactor Inform"
Business Name
Land Management Group, Inc.
�+ `'
ED
RECEIVED
Agentl Contractor 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
U N 19 2017
Steve
Morrison
Agent( Contractor 2: First Name
Laura
MI
Last Name
DCM- MHD CITY
Stasavich
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
3805 Wrightsville Ave., Suite 15
Wilmington
NC
ZIP
Phone No. 1
Phone No. 2
28403
910 - 452 - 0001
ext.
ext.
FAX No.
Contractor #
910 452 0060
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
[e-mail]; [e-mail]
<Form continues on back>
HECEIVE-D
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
MAY 3 0 2017
252-808-2808 .. 1-888-4RCOAST .. www.nccoastal management. net

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 2 of 4)
APPLICATION for
RECEIVEDMajor Development Permit
3. Project Lacatio '
dress State Rd. #
County (can be multiple) 72O2SummerDCM-
New Hanover Rest Road M 4-iD C�Ty S.R. 1417
Subdivision Name
City
State Zip
N/A- will serve Grand View residential units
Wilmington
NC 28403 -
Phone No.
Lot No.(s) (d many, attach additional page with list)
ext.
N/A, I I ,
a. In which NC river basin is the project located?
b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway and Motts Creek
c. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade?
d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
®Natural [_]Manmade []Unknown
AIWW
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
f. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
®Yes ❑No
work falls within.
City of Wilmington (above MHW) and New Hanover County
(below MHW)
4.
Site Description ............ ...
a.
Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.)
b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.)
476 feet along NHW
0.85 acres per NHC GIS data
c.
Size of individual lot(s)
d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
N/A, I I
NWL (normal water level)
(If many /of sizes, please attach additional page with a list)
Upland area — 2' ®NHW or ❑NWL
e.
Vegetation on tract
Area below NHW includes coastal marsh species such as Spartina alterniflora, Limonium carolinianum, and Salicornia
depressa. Upland on the property is largely vegetated by Morella confers.
f.
Man-made features and uses now on tract
Approximately 127 Ift of bulkhead; 6' x 652' fixed access pier; ramp; 6' x 66' floating dock providing two boat slips.
g.
Identify and describe the existing land uses adlacent to the proposed project site.
Adjacent uses to the north are residential. Adjacent uses to the west, along Wrightsville Ave, are largely commercial.
h.
How does local government zone the tract?
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
City of Wilmington zones upland as 0&1-1 (Office and
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
Institutional 1). New Hanover County zones area below
®Yes ❑No ❑NA
MHW as B-1 Business (GIS data).
j.
Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? ❑Yes SNo
k.
Hasa professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. []Yes SNo ❑NA
If yes, by whom?
I.
Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a ❑Yes SNo ❑NA
National Register listed or eligible property? RECEIVED
DGM N,
NC
MAY 3 0 2017
252-808-2808 :. 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastal management. net

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 3 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
<Form continues on next page>
m. (i) Are there wetlands on the site? ®Yes []No
(ii) Are there coastal wetlands on the site? ®Yes []No
(iii) If yes to either (i) or (ii) above, has a delineation been conducted? ®Yes []No
(Attach documentation, if available)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
Work requested in this application does not require treatment of wastewater, but the property is served by the Cape Fear
Public Utility Authority.
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
Work requested in this application does not require drinking water, but the property is served by the Cape Fear Public Utility
Authority.
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems.
There are no existing stormwater management or treatment systems on site. Existing development is pervious decking.
cNvities and Impac
a.
W II the project be for commercial, public, or private use? ❑Commercial ❑PublictGovemment
®Private/Community
b.
Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
The purpose is to expand existing docking facilities to improve water access for the Grand View residential community. A
fixed pier and platform would be constructed on Mott's Creek. Existing floating docks on the AIWW would be expanded to
provide additional dockage for boats that may range from 8' to 66' in length. No more than ten boats would be docked at the
facility at any given time. All docks would serve the residential component of the Grand View project located at 7205
Wrightsville Avenue. Slips would be available for use by residents and would be used for recreational boating.
c.
Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
Installation of structural pilings for the fixed pier, platforms and floating docks will be done with standard wash -in piling rig.
d.
List all development activities you propose.
Along the AIW W -- Installation of three new floating docks and replacement of one existing floating dock to provide side -to
dockage for boats ranging in size from 8' to 66' maximum number of boats is ten; construction of a fixed 20' x 20' gazebo,
two ramps and three ramp platforms for access. Along Motts Creek-- new 6' x 79' fixed pier and roofed, fixed platform
totaling 9' x 20'. No upland development is proposed.
e.
Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? Both
f.
What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project? None ❑Sq.Ft or []Acres
g.
Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
that the public has established use of?
h.
Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state. RECEIVE
No direct discharges to waters of the state are proposed.
JUN 19 2017
i.
Will wastewater or stormwaler be discharged into a wetland? ❑Yes ®No �r�Ip� �� �pup-
❑_4C'i1r7^ IY HD
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water? ❑Yes ❑No ®NA
I.
Is there any mitigation proposed? Oyes ®No ❑
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal. DCM WILMINGTON,
.1
'STY
C
MAY 3 0 2017
252.808-2808 .. 1-888-4RCOAST .. www.nccoastalmanagement.net

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 4 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
<Form continues on back>
6. Additional Information
In addition to this completed application form, (MP-1) the following items below, if applicable, must be submitted in order for the application
package to be complete. Items (a) — (0 are always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
insttuction booklet on how to property prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
f. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name John and Eliza Blackwell, LLC (206 Summer Rest Rd. to the north) Phone No.
Address 203 Summer Rest Road, Wilmington, NC 28405
Name NC DOT do Mr. Mason Hemdon (US 74/76 to the south) Phone No.
Address 5501 Barbados Blvd., Castle Hayne, NC 28429
Name Phone No.
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, perrmittee, and issuing dates.
CAMA Permit No. 13-06, Consolidated Ventures Corp.,
11/19/86.
CAMA Permit No. 84-01, CGRS Enterprises, LLC, 7/3/01.
Modification on 5/27/08.
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization forth, if applicable.
i. Wetland delineation, if necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10), if necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
on Land
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only th
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fad grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Date _April 11, 2017 Print Name Land Management Group, Inc., agent SUVE NjoQR. t,
Signature
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed project C E IV E D
❑DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information ❑DCM M `
ridges and Culve EC. ;VCM WILMINGTON, N^
❑DCM MP-3 Upland Development JUN 19 2017 �
®DCM MP-4 Structures Information APR 1 2 2017
DCM- MHD CITY
252.808.2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.necoastaimanagement.net

Form DCM MP-4
STRUCTURES
(Construction within Public Trust Areas)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
V.I. DOCKING FACILITY/MARINA CHARACTERISTICS ❑This section not applicable`
a. (i) Is the docking facility/marina.
b. (i) Will the facility be open to the general public?
[]Commercial ❑Public/Government ®Private/Community
❑Yes NNo
c. (i) Dock(s) and/or pier(s)
d. (i) Are Finger Piers included? [-]Yes NNo
(ii) Number Please see attached MP-4 supplement
If yes:
(iii) Length Please see attached MP-4 supplement
(ii) Number N/A
(iv) Width Please see attached MP-4 supplement
(iii) Length N/A
(v) Floating NYes []No
(iv) Width N/A
(v) Floating []Yes [-]No
e. (i) Are Platforms included? NYes ❑No
f. (i) Are Boatlifts included? []Yes NNo
If yes:
If yes:
(ii) Number Please see attached MP-4 supplement
(ii) Number N/A
(iii) Length Please see attached MP-4 supplement
(iii) Length N/A
(iv) Width Please see attached MP-4 supplement
(iv) Width N/A
(v) Floating []Yes NNo
Note: Roofed areas are calculated from dripline dimensions.
g. (i) Number of slips proposed
h. Check all the types of services to be provided.
10
❑ Full service, including travel lift and/or rail, repair or
(ii) Number of slips existing
maintenance service
2
❑ Dockage, fuel, and marine supplies
N Dockage ("wet slips") only, number of slips: 10
❑ Dry storage; number of boats:
❑ Boat ramp(s); number of boat ramps:
❑ Other, please describe:
i. Check the proposed type of siting:
❑ Land cut and access channel
❑Open water; dredging for basin and/or channel
NOpen water; no dredging required
❑Other; please describe:
k. Typical boat length: B' to 66'
m. (i) Will the facility have tie pilings?
❑Yes NNo
(ii) If yes number of tie pilings?
N/A
j. Describe the typical boats to be served (e.g., open runabout,
charter boats, sail boats, mixed types).
mixed vessel types RECEIVED
JUN 19 Z017
DCM- MHD CITYI
I. (i) Will the facility be open to the general public?
❑Yes NNo
-�ECEJIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
MAY 3 0 2017
252.808.2808 :: i-888.4RCOAST :: www.nccoastalmanaaement.net revised: 12/27/06

Form DCM MP-4 (Structures, Page 2 of 4)
2. DOCKING FACILITY/MARINA OPERA T/O "' This section not applicable
a. Check each of the following sanitary facilities that will be included in the proposed project.
❑ Office Toilets
❑ Toilets for patrons; Number _; Location.
❑ Showers
❑ Boathokling tank pumpout; Give type and location.
b. Describe treatment type and disposal location for all sanitary wastewater.
No treatment for sanitary wastewater will be needed. Bathrooms are available within walking distance at the associated
residential units, and facility will have a no overboard discharge policy. Pumpout is available at Seapath Yacht Club located on
Harbor Island, Wrightsville Beach, approximately 0.9 miles via boat from the site.
c. Describe the disposal of solid waste, fish offal and trash.
Trash cans will be located on the upland portion of the property near Summer Rest Road.
d. How will overboard discharge of sewage from boats be controlled?
A no overboard discharge policy will be enforced through the slip rental agreement and/or community rules and restrictions.
e. (i) Give the location and number of "No Sewage Discharge" signs proposed.
1- on proposed floating dock.
(ii) Give the location and number of "Pumpout Available" signs proposed.
One sign indicating nearest public pumpout (Seapath Yacht Club) will be posted on the fixed access pier.
f. Describe the special design, if applicable, for containing industrial type pollutants, such as paint, sandblasting waste and petroleum products.
No maintenance or fueling services will be offered.
g. Where will residue from vessel maintenance be disposed of?
No maintenance services will be offered or allowed.
h. Give the number of channel markers and "No Wake" signs proposed. None
i. Give the location of fuel -handling facilities, and describe the safety measures planned to protect area water quality.
No fuel services are proposed.
j. What will be the manna policy on overnight and live -aboard dockage?
No overnight or live-aboards will be allowed and will be enforced through rental agreement and/cO�rflOrffi RECEIVED
restrictions. f \ G� C
JUN 19 2017
k. Describe design measures that promote boat basin flushing?
Open water docks. DCM- M H D CITY
I. If this project is an expansion of an existing manna, what types of services are currently provided?
Expansion of existing two slip dock with no services.
•
DECEIVED
MAY 3 0 2017
252-808.2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastalmananement.net revised: 12/27/06

Form DCM MP-4 (Structures, Page 3 of 4)
m. Is the marina/docking facility proposed within a primary or secondary nursery area?
[]Yes ONO
n. Is the marinaidocking facility proposed within or adjacent to any shellfish harvesting area?
❑Yes ONO
o. Is the marinaldocking facility proposed within or adjacent to coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom
(SB), or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
❑WL NNone
p. Is the proposed marinaldocking facility located within or within close proximity to any shellfish leases? ❑Yes ONO
If yes, give the name and address of the leaseholder(s), and give the proximity to the lease.
N/A
3. BOATHOUSE (including covered lifts) N This section not applicable
a. (i) Is the boathouse structure(s):
❑Commercial ❑Public/Govemment ❑Private/Community
(ii) Number
(iii) Length
(iv) Width _
Note: Roofed areas are calculated from dripline dimensions.
4. GROIN (e.g., wood, sheelpile, etc. ha rock groin, use MP-2, Excavation and ROOM
NThis section not applicable
a. (i) Number
(ii) Length
(iii) Width
5. BREAK19NFA10 g., am"r. aheetpile, etc.) N This section not applicable
a. Length b Average distance from NHW. NWL, or wetlands
c. Maximum distance beyond NHW, NWL or wetlands
B. MOORING PILINGS
a. Is the structure(s).
[]Commercial ❑Public/Govemment ❑Private/Community
c. Distance to be placed beyond shoreline
Note: This should be measured from marsh edge, if present.
e. Arc of the swing _
7. GENERAL
®This section not applicable
b. Number
d. Description of buoy (color, inscription, size, anchor, etc.)
RECEIVED
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: w .nccoastalnnanaeennent.net revised: 12127/06

Form DCM MP-4 (Structures, Page 4 of 4)
a. Proximity of structure(s) to adjacent riparian property lines
20' to the southern riparian corridor limit;
154' to northern riparian con dior limit
Note: For buoy or mooring piling, use arc of swing including length
ofvessel.
c. Width of water body
500' along existing pier to bulkhead on eastern side AIW W
e. (i) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the project?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, explain what type and how they will be implemented.
N/A
b. Proximity of structure(s) to adjacent docking facilities.
—230' to Blackwell dock to the north
d. Water depth at watenvard end of structure at NLW or NWL
Existing depths range from -1.5' MLW to -9' MLW within
Proposed dockage area.
8.OTHER ❑This section not applicable
a. Give complete description:
April 11, 2017
Date
Grand View Community Boating Facility
Project Name
Grand View Holdings, LLC
Applicant Name
Applicant Signatu
RECEIVED
JUN 19 2017
REC. :IVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
AYR 1 1221017
M- MHD CITY
252-808-2808 :: 1.888-4RCOAST :: wwwmccoastalmanagement.net revised: 12/27106

CAMA Major Permit Application
Grand View Community Boating Facility, Wilmington, NC
5/26/2017
MP-4 Supplement
1. Docking Facility/Manna Characteristics
c. Dock(s) and/or Pier(s)
Existing 6'-wide Fixed Access Pier- - 598' to remain
Structure
Length ft
Width ft
Floating Dock
52
6
Floating Dock
30
6
Floating Dock
32
6
Floating Dock
66
6
Fixed Pier
58
6
Fixed Pier
791
6
e. Are Platforms Included?
Quantity
Len th ft
Width ft
Gazebo
20
20
Platform
8
6
Ramp Platform
6
6
Platform
20
9
New
New
New
Existing Floating Dock to be replaced, same size.
New Pier Section at end of Existing Pier - AIWW
Molts Creek- New Fixed Pier
Fixed Gazebo - AI W W
Fixed Ramp Platform at Gazebo -AIWW
Floating Ramp Platform at Gazebo - AIWW
Molts Creek- 20' x 9' covered
RECEIVED
JUN 19 2017
DCM- MHD CITY
f-IECEiVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
KIAY 3 0 2017

TO WILMINGTON
Is,
�Q
000
'Qoq
0
US HWy 76
WRIGHrSVILE AVE
� LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP,xc
Environmental C.,O.h.w,
3E05 wrpMwille Ave., Suds 15
Nfhning w NM Carom 28403
Telephone. [phone]
APO
CAMA Major Permit Application
Grand View Community Boating Facility
202 Summer Rest Road, Wilmington, NC
Site Location
TQ
SL
<<F
�F
RECEIVE
JUN 19 2017
DCM- MHD CIT
�1ECEiVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
MAY 3 0 2017
te: Revision Date:
06/09/17
91e: o um er:
NTS 02-14-045
awn By: Figure:
McKim and Creed 1 of 10

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
APPLICATION TRANSMITTAL AND PROCESSING RECORD
&gM'O/It3 3 W"L J6S LLL
1) APPLICANT: Bailey & Associates, Inc COUNTY: New Hanover
PROJECT NAME: Grand View Community Boating Facility
LOCATION OF PROJECT: 202 Summer Rest Rd, adjacent to the AIWW, in Wilmington
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED COMPLETE BY FIELD: 6-9-17 ✓
FIELD RECOMMENDATION: Attached: Yes To Be Forwarded: n/a
CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION: Attached: No To Be Forwarded: n/a
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE: Brooks Surgan DISTRICT OFFICE: WILMINGTON
nn
DISTRICT MANAGER REVIEW: rY- -��
B) DATE RECEIVED BY MAJOR PERMITS UNIT: FEE REC'D: S400/#47901 loot)
PUBLIC NOTICE REC'D: 6-17-17 / END OF NOTICE DATE: 7-8-17 ✓
ADJ. RIP. PROP NOTICES REC'D p %am,o i iutl DEED REttC' : 4/(Z-/li
APPLICATION ASSIGNED TO:
�� ON: 1
C) 75 DAY DEADLINE: sW l r 150 DAY DEADLINE:
MAIL OUT DATE: 6-15-17 STATE DUE DATE: 748-17
FEDERAL DUE DATE: FED COMMENTS REC'D:
PERMIT FINAL ACTION: ISSUE DENY DRAFT ON
AGENCY
Oral' IAGtcl�OtiiTDwn
DATE
COMMENTS
RETURNED
OBJECTION
S:
YES NO
NOTES
Division of Community Assistance
(' 29 1
Division of Coastal Management-LUP Consistency
al 11
W",
Public Water Section (DWR)
G ( ev 11
coaAtion
Land Quality Section (DEMLR)
UP q1 1-7
Division of Water Resources - 401 Section
C 0+ Me. f ton 04i OVS
Storm Water Management (DEMLR)
'toll 1
/
State Property Office
1 l7 11
Division of Archives & History
�p L I (�
✓
Division of Marine Fisheries - Shellfish Section
(42,4,111
Division of Highways (NCDOT)
R E
Wildlife Resources Commission
—1 12117
CQNIMIA5
C t
Local Permit Officer N ftic
(4z0/17
Dept. of Cultural Res / Underwater Archaeology
CM- M H D C ITy
Division of Marine Fisheries - DCM
W7 L( 1
Corps of Engineers - Regulatory Branch

Recommendations for State Permit — Bailey and Associates, Inc. c% Christopher Bailey June 14, 2017
The total square footage of the community docking facility was calculated as follows:
Shoreline length = 476 ft. x 27 sq. ft. = 12,852 sq. ft. allowable.
Covered fixed platform on AIW W (20' in length by 20' in width) = 400 sq. ft.
Covered fixed platform on Motts Creek (20' in length by 9' in width) = 180 sq. ft.
Motts Creek fixed access pier (not calculated due to configuration)
AIW W fixed access pier (not calculated due to configuration) RECEIVED
Main floating dock spine (not calculated due to configuration)
Floating docks, finger piers and tie pilings = 768 sq. ft.
Floating landing platform (6' in length by 6' in width) = 36 sq. ft. JUN 1 9 201%
Fixed landina platform (6' in length by 8' in width) = 48 so. ft.
Total = —1,432 sq. ft. DCM- MHD CITY
It is staffs recommendation that the proposal to construct a community docking facility is CONSISTENT with the Rule in 15
NCAC 7H.0208 (b) (5) (D) which states "marinas to be developed in waters subject to public trust rights (other than those
created by dredging upland basins or canals) for the purpose of providing docking for residential developments shall be allowed
no more than 27 square feet of public trust areas for every one linear foot of shoreline adjacent to these public trust areas for
construction of docks and mooring facilities. The 27 square feet allocation shall not apply to fairway areas between parallel
piers or any portion of the pier used only for access from land to the docking spaces." As proposed the community marina would
not exceed the allowable square footage
This office has concerns with the proposed marina in relation to the existing wastewater line easement, which is known as the
Northeast Interceptor (NEI), which crosses property. The Town of Wrightsville Beach obtained State Permit No. 106-78 for the
approximately 800 linear foot 14" subaqueous line on July 10, 1978 that is located on the north side of the drawbridge to the
Town of Wrightsville Beach. Wastewater is collected and pumped under the AIW W through segment #1 of the NEI to the
Cape Fear Public Utility Authority (CFPUA) pump station and ultimately to the CFPUA's Southside Wastewater Treatment
Plant. The application states the structures were designed to avoid the NEI; however, based on the size of the vessels that would
be moored at this proposed docking facility, and the unknown exact location of the NEI within the project area, the vessel use of
the proposed marina could potentially cause additional erosion within the NEI due to propeller wash, and could expose the NEI
to potential damage. The application also states that prior to the construction, a field marking ofthe NEI would be performed by
a professional utilities location company to assure this separation. It is the opinion of this office that the NEI should be
positively located in the project area prior to rendering a permit decision.
It is staffs recommendation that the proposal to construct a community docking facility and observation pier is CONSISTENT
with the Rule in 15 NCAC 7H.0208 (b) (6) (J) (iii) which states "Pier and docking facility length shall be limited by: not
extending more than one-fourth the width of a natural water body, or human -made canal or basin. Measurements to determine
widths of the water body, canals or basins shall be made from the waterward edge of any coastal wetland vegetation that borders
the water body. The one-fourth length limitation shall not apply in areas where the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or a local
government in consultation with the Corps of Engineers, has established an official pier head line. The one-fourth length
limitation shall not apply when the proposed pier is located between longer piers or docking facilities within 200 feet of the
applicant's property. However, the proposed pier or docking facility shall not be longer than the pier head line established by
the adjacent piers or docking facilities, nor longer than one-third the width of the water body." Based on the submitted plans the
marina as proposed does not appear to exceed the %4 width limitation.
It is the staffs recommendation that the proposed fixed platforms and floating docks would not encroach into the 15' riparian
setback requirement to the south. It is staffs opinion that based on the previous permits authorized at the project site and the
adjacent riparian property to the north, due to the peculiar shoreline configuration in this area of Motts Creek and the AIW W
was such that a perpendicular alignment cannot be achieved for a riparian corridor and associated setback, the intent of these
authorized projects were to prevent structures within the established access channel to the existing docking facilities and the
AIW W, and as such, is CONSISTENT with 15A NCAC 7H.0208 (b)(6)(I).

This office has concerns that the proposed project could have the potential to indirectly block or impair an area of established
navigation along the AIW W and Motts Creek. Based on the proximity of this proposed marina docking facility to the existing
private docking facilities to the north along Summer Rest Road, which connect directly to the AIW W via an access channel at
the mouth ofMotts Creek, and the NCWRC public boat ramp at Wrightsville Beach, the proposed marina docking facility could
potentially impede and congest the traditional navigation in the area of the AIW W. During the busy summer months, this area
of the AIW W can be very congested due to larger vessels sitting idle waiting for the drawbridge to open and boaters trying to
launch and retrieve smaller vessels at the NCWRC public boat ramp located at Wrightsville Beach.
NOTE: Permanent reflectors should be attached to the structure in order to make it more visible during hours of
darkness or inclement weather.
NOTE: It is strongly recommended that the permittee exercise all available precautions in the day-to-day operation of
the facility to prevent facility waste from entering the adjacent waters. Such discharge, either directly or indirectly, to adjacent
waters could contravene state water quality standards, thereby violating state law.
NOTE: Due to the proximity of the AIW W, boats utilizing the docking facility will be subject to frequent wave wash
from passing vessels. The issuance of this permit does not relieve the permittee from taking all proper steps to ensure the
integrity of the structure and the safety of moored boats. The permittee shall not hold the State ofNorth Carolina or the United
States liable for any damage to the structure or moored boats.

tyu
MEMORANDUM
To: Heather Coats
From: Michael Christenbury, Wilmington District Planner
Subject: Consistency Determination, Major Permit Application, Bailey and
Associates/Christopher Bailey, Wilmington, New Hanover County
Date: August 9, 2017
This project appears to be consistent with the 2006 Wilmington -New Hanover County
joint Land Use Plan.
The applicant proposes to expand an existing docking facility, including construction of
an observation platform, adjacent to Motts Creek and the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway
to accommodate eight (8) additional boat slips. The project is located at 202 Summer
Rest Road in Wilmington.
Areas of Environmental Concern (AEC's) impacted by the proposal are CW, EW, ES and
PT. Waters at the project site are classified as SB (Wrightsville Recreational Area) and
are not open to the harvesting of shellfish. The area is not a Primary Nursery Area.
I have reviewed this proposal for consistency with the 2006 Wilmington -New Hanover
County Joint Land Use Plan and offer the following comments.
The general area of the project is classified as Resource Protection while the AECs
impacted by the work are classified as Conservation.
In general, Wilmington -New Hanover County allows development in conservation
classified AECs, which is consistent with the State's minimum use standards. The 2006
Wilmington -New Hanover County Joint Land Use Plan contains some policies, which
exceed the State's minimum use standards. However, none of these standards appear to
be applicable to this proposal.
This project appears to be consistent with the 2006 Wilmington -New Hanover County
Joint Land Use Plan
Cc: File

Coastal Management
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
June 15, 2017
TO:
Mark Zeigler
Division of Community Assistance
Wilmington Regional Office
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
seeremry
BRAXTON DAVIS
Director
FROM: Heather Coats, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
NCDEQ - Division of Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive Ext., Wilm., NC 28405 heather. coatscD-ncdenrgov
Fax: [phone] (Courier 04-16-33)
SUBJECT: CAMA /Dredge & Fill Application Review
Applicant: Bailey & Associates c/o Chris Bailey
Project Location: 202 Summer Rest Rd., adjacent to the AIWW, in Wilmington
New Hanover County
Proposed Project: to expand an existing docking facility, and to construct an
observation platform
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
return this form to Heather Coats at the address above by July 8, 2017. If you have any
questions regarding the proposed project, contact Brooks Surgan at [phone] when
appropriate in-depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
"Additional comments may be attached"'
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
SIGNED /Y] AAIV. �- 'el `i I C-vl'
%� y� ��7 RECEIVED
DATED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
JUN 2 8 2017
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive Ext., Wilmington, NC 26405
910-796-7215

For: CAMA - Dredge and Fill Application Review
From: Mark Zeigler, AICP Community Economic Development Planner
NC Department of Commerce, Rural Economic Development Division
Wilmington Office —127 Cardinal Dr. Ext., Wilmington, NC
Date: 6-28-17
Re: Proposed Bailey and Associates — Grand View Community Docking Facility
202 Summer Rest Rd., adjacent to the AIW W, in New Hanover County
The following are comments regarding the proposed project:
A concern regarding this application is that scour from boat movement and boat
propellers overtime could remove sediment on the bottom, and potentially expose and cause
damage the North-East Interceptor sewer pipeline. As is stated in the application a boat up to
66 feet long would be permitted at the dock. Also, other non -Grand View persons with boats
larger than 66 feet would potentially have access to the proposed dock. The North-East
Interceptor sewer pipeline serves the Town of Wrightsville Beach with a population of
approximately 2,500 persons, and with a summer population much greater than this amount. A
review of boat drafts shows that a boat that is 66 feet long could have a draft of approximately
5 to 8 feet deep. Also, other non -Grand View persons with boats with a draft greater than 8
feet deep could access to the proposed docking facility. The depth below Mean Low Water to
the bottom is approximately 8' to 9' in the proposed docking area. This situation would not
provide much margin for draft safety or error in the water and with the relatively shallow
buried sewer pipeline - being approximately 3 to 4 feet below the bottom. For the preceding
reasons this office objects to the proposed project application.

Coastal Management
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
June 15, 2017
JUN 16 2017
Division of Water Resources
WIRO 'Public WaterSupph
TO: Heidi Cox
.Assistant Regional Engineering Supervisor
Public Water Supply-WiRO
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
secretary
BRAXTON DAVIS
Director
FROM: Heather Coats, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
NCDEQ - Division of Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive Ext., Wilm., NC 28405 heather. coats(oncdenr.aov
Fax: [phone] (Courier 04-16-33)
SUBJECT: CAMA / Dredge & Fill Application Review
Applicant: Bailey & Associates c% Chris Bailey
Project Location: 202 Summer Rest Rd., adjacent to the AIWW, in Wilmington
New Hanover County
Proposed Project: to expand an existing docking facility, and to construct an
observation platform
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
return this form to Heather Coats at the address above by July 8, 2017. If you have any
questions regarding the proposed project, contact Brooks Surgan at [phone] when
appropriate in-depth comments with supporting data is requested.
:. Pa weep cci,1� Ose+ t ei
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.{,•5 nee.,) dcck,as_
"Additional comments may be attached'" j" Af14 7;LQ{r,_W_Xvw - II
o�J� L,60du,y2ac�arc�rxa�be
This agency has no comment on the proposed projed.a- PA4,(A6
pta"a a. e&^&-e,t 9/0 796-736d'
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changeszI6-A..-r�iV,,•-cir.,
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
SIGNED�(��O /
DATED
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality ] Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive Ext , Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7215

Coastal Management
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
BRAXTON DAVIS
Direcmr
June 15, 2017
JUN
TO: Dan Sams 6 ?017 s
District Manager-DEMLR
Wilmington Regional Office
FROM: Heather Coats, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
NCDEQ - Division of Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive Ext., Wilm., NC 28405 heather. coatsCaD_ncdenrgov
Fax: [phone] (Courier 04-16-33)
SUBJECT: CAMA /Dredge & Fill Application Review
Applicant: Bailey & Associates c/o Chris Bailey
Project Location: 202 Summer Rest Rd., adjacent to the AIWW, in Wilmington
New Hanover County
Proposed Project: to expand an existing docking facility, and to construct an
observation platform
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
return this form to Heather Coats at the address above by July 8, 2017. If you have any
questions regarding the proposed project, contact Brooks Surgan at [phone] when
appropriate in-depth comments with supporting data is requested. i%
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
"Additional comments may be attached"
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described
co ents.
SIGNED //�
DATED hle ZI1
in the attached
WN! 1WlLMINGTON, NC
JUN 18 2017
State of North Carolina I Em rmarnental Quality I Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive Ext., Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7215

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Memorandum:
rX*ILI
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
August 10, 2017
Heather Coats, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
FROM: Jim Gregson, Regional Supervis
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Wilmington Regional Office
SUBJECT: Bailey & Associates c/o Chris Bailey DWR#2011-0410v4
Grand View Community Boating Facility
New Hanover County, NC
While this project is below the thresholds which require written approval for issuance of a
Section 401 Water Quality Certification, the DWR has concerns that this project may pose a
potential future risk to the Northeast Interceptor sewer line which traverses through the project
area. The DWR received via email on July 28, 2017, a report prepared by Highfill Infrastructure
Engineering (Northeast Interceptor Segment 1 Intracoastal Waterway Crossing Preliminary
Assessment) for the Town of Wrightsville Beach. After reviewing the information within the
report, it is evident that a portion of the NEI abutting the project area is partially exposed and
that one of the pilings of the existing access pier is installed within 3 inches of the NEI. The
information provided by the applicant within the CAMA Major Permit application indicates that
the "Pipe Depth Below Mud Line" is 4.0 feet in the exact same location where the pipe is
reported to be partially exposed. Based upon this report and the other information within our
files, the DWR has concerns about the risk of potential damage to the NEI from the construction
of and future use of the proposed marina. The DWR supports implementation of the
recommendations submitted to the DCM by the Wildlife Resources Commission of July 7, 2017
(attached). In addition, the DWR must be immediately notified in the event of any damage or
loss of function to the NEI before, during, or after completion of this project.
cc: Tyler Crumbley - USACE Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Steve Morrison - Land Management Group, Inc., 3805 Wrightsville Avenue, suite 15,
Wilmington, NC 28403
WiRO/LF
Nothing Compares DCM RECEIVED
, NC
State of North Carolina 1 Environmental Quality ; Water Resources
512 N. Salisbury Street 1 1611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh. NC 27699-1611 n q 0
919.707AUG L79000 I

® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Heather Coats
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
FROM: Maria T. Dunn, Coastal Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Division
DATE: July 7, 2017
SUBJECT: CAMA Dredge/Fill Penrut Application for Bailey cf' Associates c/o Chris Bailey,
(Grand View Community Boating Facility), New Hanover County, North Carolina.
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) reviewed the permit
application with regard to impacts on fish and wildlife resources. The project site is located at 202
Smnmer Rest Road adjacent Motts Creek the AIWW in Wilmington, NC. Our comments are provided in
accordance with provisions of the Coastal Area Management Act (G.S. 113A-100 through 113A-128), as
amended, Sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act, as amended, and the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.).
The applicant proposes to expand an existing docking facility and construct an observation platform
adjacent to Motts Creek and the AIWW. The facility expansion would accommodate 10 vessels ranging
in length from 8' to 66'. Within the project area is the Northeast Interceptor (NEI), a sewer force main for
the Town of Wrightsville Beach. This utility line is located 2' — 4.2' below the substrate of the project
area. Water depths within the location of the NET and docking facility range from -8' to -9' NLW. No
dredging is proposed at this time. Pile installation will occur no closer than 19' from the NEI.
Construction would not occur until a field survey and marking is complete. All structures within the
project proposal are less than ''/, width of the creek and outside the US Army Corps of Engineers federal
channel setback Separate from the docking facility is a 6' by 79' access pier with 9' by 20' platform
located within Motts Creek. The project area is immediately northwest the US 74 (Wrightsville Ave)
drawbridge and across the AIWW from a NC Wildlife Resources Commission public boating access
area. Molts Creek and the ARM at this location are classified SB by the Environmental Management
Commission.
The NCWRC has reviewed the permit application and has several statements. Our agency participated in
the February meeting where concerns were stated regarding the NEI and overall increase of navigation
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone] UUM vvi
DCM
NC
AUG 112017

CMDF_Beilny & Associates Page 2 July 7, 2017
Grand View Community Boating Facility
congestion in the area. These concerns are still valid and can better be addressed with the following
recommendations:
• Measures should be taken to protect the NEI from any incidental impacts from facility use. Signs
indicating the presence of the NEI, "No Anchor" signs, and any other meats of notifying boaters
the presence of the utility line should be adopted.
e The facility is designed to accommodate vessels within a significant size range. Slip designation
should be done so smaller vessels that need less draft and would have less prop wash are located
in the more shallow areas and areas near the NEI.
e Contact information for the Town of Wrightsville Beach should be on -hand so the Town can
immediately be contacted if an incident occurs between a vessel and the NEI.
• The facility should be cognizant of the NEI and any changes in substrate depth over the line that
may occur over time.
• Dredging is not currently proposed. It should be noted that if the constuetion of the facility
increases shoaling of the area or if shoaling occurs for any reason, dredging would not be looked
favorably upon by the NCWRC due to the presence of the NEI. If shoaling does occur, the
facility would need to focus on smaller draft vessels.
• The NCWRC believes the proposal will likely impede navigation and increase congestion in the
area. Although this occurs with most all development in coastal areas, the presence of the draw
bridge over the AIWW and nearby public access area exasperates the situation.
• The NCWRC has no comment on the access pier within Motts Creel.
We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this permit application. If you need further
assistance or additional information, please contact me at [phone] or at
maria.dmu: a ncwildl iie. or_
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC

I. I
CMDF_Bailey & Associates Page 2 July 7, 2017
Grand View Community Boating Facility
congestion in the area. These concerns are still valid and can better be addressed with the following
recommendations:
6 Measures should be taken to protect the NEI from any incidental impacts from facility use. Signs
indicating the presence of the NEI, "No Anchor" signs, and any other means of notifying boaters
the presence of the utility "line should be adopted.
e The facility is designed to accommodate vessels within a significant size range. $lip designation
should be done so smaller vessels that need less draft and would have less prop wash are located
in the more shallow areas and areas near the NEI.
a Contact information for the Town of Wrightsville Beach should be on -hand so the Town can
immediately be contacted if an incident occurs between a vessel and the NEI.
a The facility should be cognizant of the NEI and any changes in substrate depth over the line that
may occur over time.
Dredging is not currently proposed. It should be noted that if the construction of the facility
increases shoaling of the area or if shoaling occurs for any reason, dredging would.not be looked
favorably upon by the NCWRC due to the presence of the NEI. If shoaling does occur, the
facility would need to focus on smaller draft vessels.
e The NCWRC believes the proposal will likely impede navigation and increase congestion in the
area. Although this occurs with most all development in coastal areas, the presence of the draw
bridge over the AIW W and nearby public access area exasperates the situation.
® The NCWRC has no comment on the access. pier within Motts Creek
We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this permit application. -If you need Rather
assistance or additional information, please'contact me at (252) 948-39.16 or at
maria.dw�I: G nco: ildliie.orr '
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC

W✓
Coastal Management
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
June 15, 2017
F OM:
SUBJECT:
Applicant:
:Celve
IN 5 zo17
Georgette Scott
Stormwater Section
DEMLR - WiRO
ROY COOPER
Govemor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Semmry
BRAXTON DAVIS
Dheaor
I Heather Coats, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
1 >� c NCDEQ - Division of Coastal Management
v 127 Cardinal Drive Ext., Wilm., NC 28405 heather. coats(o)ncdenr.00v
Fax: [phone] (Courier 04-16-33)
CAMA /Dredge & Fill Application Review
Bailey & Associates c% Chris Bailey
Project Location: 202 Summer Rest Rd., adjacent to the AIWW, in Wilmington
New Hanover County
Proposed Project: to expand an existing docking facility, and to construct an
observation platform
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
return this form to Heather Coats at the address above by July 8, 2017. If you have any
questions regarding the proposed project, contact Brooks Surgan at [phone] when
appropriate in-depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
**Additional comments may be attached**
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments. n n
SIGNED A:;L4 3
DATED Cob �/ 7
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
State of Nouth Carolina I Environmental Quality I Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive Eat., Wilmington, NC 28405 J U N k 2017
910-796-7215

Energy, Mineral &
Land Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
June 21, 2017
Mr. Chris Bailey
Grand View Holdings, LLC
c/o Bailey and Associates, Inc
P.O. Box 400
Jacksonville, NC 28541
Subject: EXEMPTION
Stormwater Project No. SW8150617 MODIFICATION
Grand View Community Boating Facility
New Hanover County
Dear Mr. Bailey:
ROY COOPER
E,OYerIwr
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
TRACY DAVIS
Director
On June 15, 2017, the Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Energy, Mineral, and land Resources received a
copy of the CAMA Major Permit Application for the subject project. Staff review of the plans and specifications on
June 16, 2017 has determined that the development activities proposed at this time will not pose a threat to surface
water quality from stormwater runoff. The Director has determined that projects that are reviewed and approved by
the Division as not posing a water quality threat from stormwater runoff should not be subject to the stormwater
management permitting requirements of 15A NCAC 2H.1000, the stormwater rules. By copy of this letter, we are
informing you that this project will not require a stormwater management permit.
If the subject project disturbs one acre or more and has a point source discharge of stormwater runoff, then it is also
subject to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater discharge requirements. You
are required to have an NPDES permit for stormwater discharge from projects meeting these criteria. All temporary
built -upon area associated with the construction of the project must be removed within 30 days of completion of the
project, or when it is no longer needed, whichever occurs first.
If you have any questions or need additional information concerning this matter please contact Georgette Scott at
[phone], or via e-mail at [e-mail].
Since y, 41=z2s��
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
GDSlgds: IIIStormwateAPermits & Projects12017 \150617 Exemption12017 06 permit 150617
cc: Land Management Group, Inc.
New Hanover County Building Inspections RECEIVED
Brooks SurganlShaun Simpson-DCMIWIRO
DCM Morehead City JUL 0 7 2017
Wilmington Regional Office Stormwater File
DCM- MHD CITY
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Energy. Mineral and Land Resources
Wilmington Regional Office 1127 Cardinal Drive Extension I Wilmington. NC 28405
910 796 7215

Coastal Management
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
June 15, 2017
TO:
Tim Walton
Dept of Administration
State Property Office
REvEI V CD
JUN 2 9 2017
DOA
STATE PROPERTY
OFFICE
ROY COOPER
Govemm
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Sec,elary
BRAXTON DAVIS
Dimclo,
FROM: Heather Coats, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
NCDEQ - Division of Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive Ext., Wilm., NC 28405 heather. coats(o)-ncdenrgov
Fax: [phone] (Courier 04-16-33)
SUBJECT: CAMA /Dredge & Fill Application Review
Applicant: Bailey & Associates c% Chris Bailey
Project location: 202 Summer Rest Rd., adjacent to the AIWW, in Wilmington
New Hanover County
Proposed Project: to expand an existing docking facility, and to construct an
observation platform
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
return this form to Heather Coats at the address above by July 8, 2017. If you have any
questions regarding the proposed project, contact Brooks Surgan at [phone] when
appropriate in-depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
ZTh
dditional comments may be attached**
s agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
SIGNS
DATE
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
RECEIVED
()CM WILMMISTON, NC
k,
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Coastal Management 1
127 Cardinal Dnve ExL, Wilmington, NC 29405 U -
910-796-7215

ROY COOPER
covemnr
�K' P, MICHAEL S. REGAN
CoastBRAXTON DAVIS
ENVIRONMENTAL
enr 1 1 JUN 3.0 201T 1, n Inr
ENVI80NNEN7AL QUALITY t � Irtc
I I{i�iCl1�i ,�
June 1$, 2017 IT -
TO: Renew Gledhill -Early
Dept. of Cultural Resources
Archives & History FH t�GAlm
FROM: Heather Coats, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator• /
NCDEQ - Division of Coastal Management;
127 Cardinal, Drive Ext., Wilm: NC 28405 heat_her.coa_tsAr)cden_cgoy
Fax: [phone]' (Courler�'�"9T�'50.4.-18:=33�
SUBJECT: CAMA/Dredde &-FillApplicatiomReview Ihh1 i
Applicant: Bailey & Associates c% Chris Bailey
Project Location: 202 Summer. Rest Rd:, adjacent to the.AlWW, in Wilmington
New Hanover County
Proposed Project: to expand an existing docking facility, and to construct an
observation platform
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the: proposed project and
retarnihisforrn'to'H6Df;er Cows at the.address above by July 8, 2017.. If you: have any
questions regarding the -proposed project, contact Brooks-Surgan at"(9.10) 796-7270 when
appropriate in-depth comments with supporting data is. requested.
REPLYi This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
""Additional comments may be attached**
This agency has no comment on,the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments. ;�((jj,� ��jj•���
SIGNED
Receive
DATED i..
JUL a 5 2017
®CM
Stated Noah Carolina I Envimnmeoial Quality I Coastal Management JUL 0 5 2017
127 Cardinal Drive Ext., Wlmington, NC 28405
910.796-0215

Coastal Management
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
June 15, 2017
TO:
Shannon Jenkins
NC DMF
Shellfish Sanitation Section
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
BRAXTON DAVIS
Uirectar
FROM: Heather Coats, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
NCDEQ - Division of Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive Ext., Wilm., NC 28405 heather. coatsa(),ncdenrgov
Fax: [phone] (Courier 04-16-33)
SUBJECT: CAMA /Dredge & Fill Application Review
Applicant: Bailey & Associates c/o Chris Bailey
Project Location: 202 Summer Rest Rd., adjacent to the AIWW, in Wilmington
New Hanover County
Proposed Project: to expand an existing docking facility, and to construct an
observation platform
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
return this form to Heather Coats at the address above by July 8, 2017. If you have any
questions regarding the proposed project, contact Brooks Surgan at [phone] when
appropriate in-depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
**Additional comments may be attached** G
G1OSr
This agency has no comment on the proposed project. A✓,14
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
SIGNED
RECEIVED
DATED
JUN 2 6 Z017
DCM- MHD CITY
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive Ext., Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7215

ROY COOPER
1'a
Marine Fisheries
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
June 23, 2017
MEMORANDUM
TO:
From:
Through:
SUBJECT:
Applicant:
RECEIVED
JUN 2 6 2017
DCM- MHD CITY
Heather Coats, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
Andrew Haines,
Environmental Program Supervisor
Shannon Jenkins, Section Chief
Shellfish Sanitation & Recreational Water Quality
CAMA Application Review
Bailey & Associates c/o Chris Bailey
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Sec"tary
BRAXTON C. DAVIS
Doe(tot
Project Location: 202 Summer Rest Rd., adjacent to the AIWW, In Wilmington
New Hanover County
Proposed Project: To expand an existing docking facility, and to construct an
observation platform
It is requested that Shellfish Sanitation be notified by the contractor or the applicant's agent prior
to commencement of dock construction or any other bottom disturbing activities. Initial
notification should occur at least one week prior to the projected start date, and again 24 hours
prior to the actual start date.
If at any time during the construction phase it is suspected that the nearby force sewer mainline
has been disturbed, Shellfish Sanitation should be notified immediately. Timely response is
important in the event that a temporary shellfish closure or swimming advisory are necessary.
Additionally, a post construction survey of the sewer line is recommended to assess sewer line
integrity.
Due to the relatively shallow depth of the sewer line within the substrate, there are concerns of
potential future damage incurred from boating activities at the proposed docks. Shellfish
Sanitation should be notified immediately in any instance of damage to the sewer line.
Nothing Compares
State of North Carolina I Division of Marine Fisheries
3441 Arendell Street I P.O. Box 769 1 Morehead City. North Carolina 28557
252-726-7021

Coastal Management
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
June 15, 2017
TO:
RECEIVED
JUL 0 7 2017
DISTRICT 3
David Harris
NC DOT
Roadside Environmental Unit
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
BRAXTON DAVIS
Dimaor
FROM: Heather Coats, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
NCDEQ - Division of Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive Ext., Wilm., NC 28405 heather. coatsCcilncdenrgov
Fax: [phone] (Courier 04-16-33)
SUBJECT: CAMA /Dredge & Fill Application Review
Applicant: Bailey & Associates c% Chris Bailey
Project Location: 202 Summer Rest Rd., adjacent to the AIWW, in Wilmington
New Hanover County
Proposed Project: to expand an existing docking facility, and to construct an
observation platform
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
return this form to Heather Coats at the address above by July 8, 2017. If you have any
questions regarding the proposed project, contact Brooks Surgan at [phone] when
appropriate in-depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
"Additional comments may be attached"
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
; ��WW_
�r
DATED
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Coastal Management
127 Cardimml Drive Ext., Wilmington, NC 28405 JUL 13 2017
910-796-7215

Coastal Management
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
June 15, 2017
TO:
Maria Dunn
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
For WiRO
M
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secrelary
BRAXTON DAVIS
Director
)+ C
]UN 2117
REMVED
FROM: Heather Coats, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator.
NCDEQ - Division of Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive Ext., Wilm., NC 28405 heather. coats(c)-ncdenrgov
Fax: [phone] (Courier 04-16-33)
SUBJECT: CAMA /Dredge & Fill Application Review
Applicant: Bailey & Associates c% Chris Bailey
Project Location: 202 Summer Rest Rd., adjacent to the AIWW, in Wilmington
New Hanover County
Proposed Project: to expand an existing docking facility, and to construct an
observation platform
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
return this form to Heather Coats at the address above by July 8, 2017. If you have any
questions regarding the proposed project, contact Brooks Surgan at [phone] when
appropriate in-depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
"Additional comments may be attached"
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
SIGNED A J �
DATED _�-+ 2oIq
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive ExL, Wilmington, NC 28405 JUL 12 2017
910-796-7215

® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
1 _ 1 t_. VII lUI
TO: Heather Coats
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
�wa
FROM: Maria T. Dunn, Coastal Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Division
DATE: July 7, 2017
SUBJECT: CAMA Dredge/Fill Permit Application for Bailey & Associates c/o Chris Bailey,
(Grand View Community Boating Facility), New Hanover County, North Carolina.
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) reviewed the permit
application with regard to impacts on fish and wildlife resources. The project site is located at 202
Summer Rest Road adjacent Motts Creek the AIW W in Wilmington, NC. Our comments are provided in
accordance with provisions of the Coastal Area Management Act (G.S. 113A-100 through 113A-128), as
amended, Sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act, as amended, and the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.).
The applicant proposes to expand an existing docking facility and construct an observation platform
adjacent to Motts Creek and the AIW W. The facility expansion would accommodate 10 vessels ranging
in length from 8' to 66'. Within the project area is the Northeast Interceptor (NEI), a sewer force main for
the Town of Wrightsville Beach. This utility line is located 2' — 4.2' below the substrate of the project
area. Water depths within the location of the NEI and docking facility range from -8' to -9' NLW. No
dredging is proposed at this time. Pile installation will occur no closer than 19' from the NEI.
Construction would not occur until a field survey and marking is complete. All structures within the
project proposal are less than %4 width of the creek and outside the US Army Corps of Engineers federal
channel setback. Separate from the docking facility is a 6' by 79' access pier with 9' by 20' platform
located within Motts Creek. The project area is immediately northwest the US 74 (Wrightsville Ave)
draw bridge and across the AIW W from a NC Wildlife Resources Commission public boating access
area. Motts Creek and the AIW W at this location are classified SB by the Environmental Management
Commission.
The NCWRC has reviewed the permit application and has several statements. Our agency participated in
the February meeting where concerns were stated regarding the NEI and overall increase of navigation
Mailing Address: Habitat Conservation • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-17MCEIVED
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone] DCM WILMINGTON, Nr
JUL 12 2017

CMDF Bailey & Associates Page 2 July 7, 2017
Grand View Community Boating Facility
congestion in the area. These concerns are still valid and can better be addressed with the following
recommendations:
• Measures should be taken to protect the NEI from any incidental impacts from facility use. Signs
indicating the presence of the NEI, "No Anchor" signs, and any other means of notifying boaters
the presence of the utility line should be adopted.
• The facility is designed to accommodate vessels within a significant size range. Slip designation
should be done so smaller vessels that need less draft and would have less prop wash are located
in the more shallow areas and areas near the NEI.
• Contact information for the Town of Wrightsville Beach should be on -hand so the Town can
immediately be contacted if an incident occurs between a vessel and the NEI.
• The facility should be cognizant of the NEI and any changes in substrate depth over the line that
may occur over time.
• Dredging is not currently proposed. It should be noted that if the construction of the facility
increases shoaling of the area or if shoaling occurs for any reason, dredging would not be looked
favorably upon by the NCWRC due to the presence of the NEI. If shoaling does occur, the
facility would need to focus on smaller draft vessels.
• The NCWRC believes the proposal will likely impede navigation and increase congestion in the
area. Although this occurs with most all development in coastal areas, the presence of the draw
bridge over the AIW W and nearby public access area exasperates the situation.
• The NCWRC has no comment on the access pier within Motts Creek
We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this permit application. If you need further
assistance or additional information, please contact me at [phone] or at
maria.dunwa ncwildlife.ore
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
JUL 12 2017

�4
Coastal Management
ENVIFONMENTAL QUALITY
June 15. 2017
TO: Kathryn Thurston AICP
Dept. of Planning
City of Wilmington
ROY COOPER
(;o.enuu
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secrewy
BRAXTON DAVIS
Utrecror
FROM: Heather Coats, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
NCDEQ - Division of Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive Ext., Wilm., NC 28405 heather. coats(o)-ncdenr.gov
Fax: [phone] (Courier 04-16-33)
SUBJECT: CAMA /Dredge & Fill Application Review
Applicant: Bailey & Associates c/o Chris Bailey
Project Location: 202 Summer Rest Rd., adjacent to the AIWW, in Wilmington
New Hanover County
Proposed Project: to expand an existing docking facility, and to construct an
observation platform
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
return this form to Heather Coats at the address above by July 8, 2017. If you have any
questions regarding the proposed project, contact Brooks Surgan at [phone] when
appropriate in-depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
"Additional comments may be attached"
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
`0JtS11CQ a� Q, M t5)
This agency approve of the project only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
SIGNED --�1
DATED -QQ NEC iVE
JUN 2 0 2011
State of North Grolina I Eawonmmtal Quality I Coeval Management
127 Cardinal D ve F.xi., Wilmington, NC 29405
910-796-7215 '

Coastal Management
ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY
June 15. 2017
TO:
Curt Weychert
Fisheries Resource Specialist
M HC-DC M
ROY COOPER
Gov ,
MICHAEL S. REGAN
4eewary
BRAXTON DAVIS
Al ao,
FROM: Heather Coats, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
NCDEQ - Division of Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive Ext., Wilm , NC 28405 heather. coats(a[incdenr.gov
Fax: [phone] (Courier04-16-33)
SUBJECT CAMA / Dredge & Fill Application Review
Applicant: Bailey & Associates c/o Chris Bailey
Project Location: 202 Summer Rest Rd., adjacent to the AIWW, in Wilmington
New Hanover County
Proposed Project: to expand an existing docking facility, and to construct an
observation platform
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
return this form to Heather Coats at the address above by July 8, 2017. If you have any
questions regarding the proposed project, contact Brooks Surgan at [phone] when
appropriate in-depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY:
"Additional comments may be attached"
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
corn ents
SIGNED
RECEIVED
DATED R JUN 19 2017
DCM- MHD CITY
SEC _; VED
Smte ofNoM Ca.[.I FnvieolvoeRmi QRzhN I (:oazW Nlaoegemeol
127 Cardinal Dnve Ext, WilmingtoN NC 28405 DCM-WILMINGTON, NC,
910-796-7215
JUN 2 9 2017

Nry
Coastal Manag'erilent
ENVIRONMEMAL QUALITY
MEMORANDUM: -
TO: Heather Coats, DCM Assistant Major Permit Coordinator
FROM: Curt Weychert, DCM Fisheries Resource Specialist
SUBJECT: Bailey & Associates co Chris Bailey Dock & Platform
DATE: June 29, 2017
ROY COOPER
Gmm.r
MICHAEL S. REGAN
5e ary
BRAXTON DAVIS
Dun ror
A North Carolina Division of, Coastal Management (DCM) Fisheries Resource Specialist has
reviewed the CAMA permit application for proposed actions that impact fish and fish habitats. The
applicant proposes to modify an existing,docking facility to accommodate 10 vessels.and construct a
fixed pier and gazebo adjacent to Motts Creek and the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (AIWW). The
project will impact soft bottom habitat through piling installation and shade open water and coastal
wetlands.
Shallow bottom is an important foraging habitat for juvenile and adult.fish and invertebrates, and aids
in storing and cycling of sediment, nutrients, and toxins between the bottom and water column. Soft
bottom habitat is used to some extent by most native coastal fish species in North Carolina. The
habitat is particularly productive and, by providing refuge from predators, is an important nursery
area. Species dependent on shallow soft bottom includeclams, crabs, flounder,, spot, Atlantic
croaker; sea mullet, drum, and rays. ,
Location and the proposed amount of slips would not raise a concern for any further shellfish
the deeper draft associated with large vessels and the relatively shallow depths on the westem side of
the facility, it is recommended that the applicant restrict access of large vessels to slips 1, 2, 9, and 10
which will have an impact with the bottom substrate through contact or prop wash. Per Figure 5 of
10 in the application packet, depths of those four slips range from <24 feet in depth at MLW.
Construction of vertical structures often results in accretion of the project area due to baffled water
flow leading to deposition of material on the substrate. If future water depths become insufficient for
use, DMF may object to dredging proposals due to adverse impacts to fisheries habitats.
Contact Curt Weychert at [phone] ext. 213 or CurLWeychergncdenr.gov with further
questions or concerns. .
State of Nosh Canalme I Environmental Quality I Coastal Management
Cmnmerta Avenue I Moorhead City, NC 28557
252-808-28081252-247-3330(f.).

MEMORANDUM:
TO: Heather. Coats, DCM. Assistant Major hermit Coordinator
FROM:- Curt Weychert, DCM Fisheries Resource -Specialist
SUBJECT- Bailey & Associates co Chris Bailey Dock.&'Platform.
DATE: June29, 2017
A North Carolina Division of,Coastal Management (IDCK Fisheries Resource Specialrsthas`•
reviewed the: CAMA permit apphcatioi for proposed actions that impact fish and fish.habitats. The
applicant proposes to modify an existing docking facility to aceommodate a 0 vessels and -construct a
fixed pier and gazebo adjacent to Motts Creck and the Atlantib Intracoastal Waterway (AIW W), The.
project will impact soft b'ottain hahitatthrough piling installation and shade open water and coastal
wetlands:
Shallowbottom is an nnportant foraging habitat forluvenile and adult,fish and invertebrates, and aids
in storing and cycling of sediment, nutrients, and toa�ins between the bottom and water column. 'Soft
bottomhabitst is used to souie extent by .most native coastal" fish species in North Carolina : The:
habitat ts•p4ni6ularly;productive "and, by providing refuge froth predators, is an important nurser . y
area, speciesldependenf on shallow soft bottom include: clams,'crabs, floundar;. spot 'Atlantic
croaker-, sea mullet; -drum; and rays.
Location.and the proposed amount of slips would not raise a -concern for any further shell;5sh
closures. The Wlicantsiatcs that boats usin_this facility will' ran�e'frnm R* (66" fe.Pr in tan(tt, r),IA ti,
the deeper draft associated with large vessels and the relatively shallow depths on the:weste'rn side of
the facility; it is recommended That the applicant restrict access of large vessels toslips 1, 2;_9, and'10
which will have, an impaa'wdth the bottom substrate,througlj'contact or prop wash: Per Figure - of
10. in the application packet, depths of those four slips: range from < 4 feet.in depth at MLW.
Construction of vertical structures often results in accretion of the'projectarea due to baffled water
flow leading to deposition of material on.the substrate. If future'water depths become insufficient for
use; DMF may object to dredging proposals due.to adverse impacts to es habitats.
Contact Curt Weychert at [phone] ext. 213 or Curt WeychW ncdenr.EOV with further
questions or concerns.
. - State ofNodh Carolina I EovimmvmtfftQiality I C=talManag®mt
400 Comm ma Avmae I Morehead City, NC 29557 .
252-908-28081252-247-3330 (fa) .

Coats, Heather
From: Weychert, Curtis R
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 2:02 PM
To: Coats, Heather
Subject: Bailey and associates comments
Attachments: Bailey & Associates co Chris Bailey Dock & Platform Comments Signed. pdf
Heather, please add this note to the comments document attached to this email regarding the Bailey & Associates
Permit.
"There is concern that vessel use of the proposed facility would increase the potential for erosion of the sediment above
the existing force main, known as the Northeast Interceptor (NEI), increasing the potential for damage. If authorized, it
is strongly suggested that precautions be developed to minimize any potential damage and address concerns. Marina
users should be notified of the location of the NEI, its function, and the potential ecological impacts if breached. "No
Anchorage" signage should be displayed and enforced, identifying the location of the NEI and the risk of effluent
discharge if breached. It is encouraged that the applicant and the town of Wrightsville Beach develop a plan in case of a
breach, the need for maintenance of the NEI, etc. "
Thanks,
Curt
Curtis Weychert
Fisheries Resource Specialist
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
252-808-2808 ext. 213
Curt. WeychertCcilncdenr.cov
400 Commerce Ave.
Morehead City, NC 28557
Nothing Compares...

DEPARTMENT ICIFTHEARMY:
WILMINGTON DISTRICT , 66ftps &MGINFIEIRS
r3q'DARLINGTON-AVENUE
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 2s46m 343,
August 9, 1617
Regulatory Division,
Actiou,11J,No. SAW fl-Q0775
Mr, Poug'Huggetf
Division of Coastal. Management
North Carolina Department of
Environmental: Quality
400 Commerce Avenue,
Morehead.City,,Northtarolina 2855Z-3421
Deoel&. Huggetti
Reference the revised application of'Mr., ChriO Baileyto construct one newdoplb# facility
ongotts Creek (W x 01) and expand the existing
commodate
10 vessels at 2.0,21 Summer- Rest'Road in.W. NewHanover County, Nbrth- Carolina
Coordinates in liceitnaLDegr_pesare:--34.21'8812,N.r77.812594 W.
The .existing fried i will continucto provide access, and:approxiinathly93' ofih&piiDr
pier
will 1 be removed for ,pjapeIneAtof the floating dock�i,New-sd-iwtafeslohthe .ATWWwill inchide:
(1),a6'x,58'section,of,hewfixed:acces§pier, .(2)aO'k52"floating d'ock,.(3).-a,6,x30i,-:ff6adbg4
dock,, (4�.a 6'x-32!,floatingi.d6dka 20'k 20'-fixbd,g#tb6, Nfo radip platforms and Nro.ranips. A
9'x2O! fixed, covered platform (cr6bihg dock) is,prdposed on Motes Creek and Will be accessed,
by & new OWW_figed pier -,extending 79! from the existing fixed pier.. The crabbing docktobe.
located mfthe bpper",rdwh of Motts Creek will not extend beyond the 4'14Watekbody'digtaace or
Occupy ih6.clLtmel,por6otLOf the creek.
The Federal, agencies have_completedreview of the proposal as preseritcol'by the
application and your field investigation report.
Werecommend that tbq.fblIpwin&condi#qns be included in the State authorization:
1. Iii,order to fiirthqrpXqteqt the endangered West Indian Manatee, Tricheohils mariatus,
the applicant must finpjenictittlia U.S: Fish and Wildlife Service's Manatee Guidelines, and
strictly adhere to all requirements therein. The guidelines can be.f I 6urid at
h6:/Iwww.fws.gov/ . nc-calinamnidl/ . ffianat6e% guideliriqs:pdf

-2-
I No dredging is autho&e&'
3. 'ghtaand,;signals
pt,escribeabythe tT,S.,Coast O.ugWd;thmi;gl),x.egWaiio4sorptip v, onauthorized faPill
Coast Guard
4: All, work --authorized by this pqmit must be pqr%oMed,irv*ict-qgmpApcelvn'th the
submitted plans, wVqh 4e q,p* of ftipe must be
approved by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) prior to implementation.
5. The docks and,plersexte#ding over-wetiandis will beelevatcdsufficionffy (a
.mioiinum.of 3 feet) -AoVethe wetland substrafeto prevent total shading of vegetation, substrate?
or 6thei elements ofthe:dquatiednvironnient.
6.. The permittee, understands - anti agreesthat if, fi=6 Operations b , State&
feq*eihe'itmo'v4relocation, orother alteration, of the structure ,'or.-workauthorized; or
if, lithe opinion of the 9ecretary-alhe, Amy "s auffiorized represputady . said structure or
work sball causeunteasonOble obstruction tolle4ree navigatio4of the navigable waters, *
petmittee vvi11 betequired upon due notice from eV;S,Army Corps of to rem.m,
relocate, or alter the s1tructural)y9dkur obstructions caused thereby, without expense to, the,
United States..
7. Approval. of -the
- - structure is based on d6te ,ons-that-there
hatther
e wo1uld,6e' h6
obstuction tonavigatoiThestructure hay be damaged byWaveIwasi N-mpasJ.mg.ve ssels.
Egubic"ifli�spetmitkouldnottd-c6lgtruet,.Asi6iievingthopermAteeoftaI&gpropcy,9tcps
-to 'Lu-=---e.th-.c;stt'a-cf-a-rer-a'hdindoiidboats ,wift,not'lie ddniggedbywkv6Wash.
& The author
rightto frejaoavigation on all navigable waters pf the Ue4State% oaffemp t will'b
I 1 11nif - I - .1 — - �, N� I- , q;made by,
thepermtttee to prevent ttie Ertl and free use by fhewbho of W-navigable waters at or, adiacent
to the authorized workfor reason,. other than safety.
9. Except as.specifliedinjhqplans attached to pprinit, no =cavation -.0-or
mechanized land-olqaxmg activities,; 4aU,,takepjace;�t4nytime-ih7ffieconstructionlor
r�u- ' pftbjsprpjqct-,,inswhammmer,as-to impairnormal flows and circulati6npattdms
within Waters orWetlands or to reduce Ifie.-reach ofwateisor wetlands.
10. Except as authorized, by this permit oy- any IIRACr approvedmodifiicatitm to this,
permit,. no excavation, -fill bkbiedba mAzed land-cleariigactivities shalt take place at ahYtimij in

-2
3n''�'h�Perrrittea`uz�sYi�afalxa�#d.xttai�t�ii���
4., Al work abe perfastnet compk anc�wrththe
�TPb�raa,�Ye&W Oarc a: Za} dtht P"ermt4.,�6Wmaci cation fo Ehesoplaw mustbe
appr ayed l y fi1?e L[ lAW Qgzps of Engineers (UMCE)=priarto s`mpl'emerttadam
,�_, Thadoel� and"pier5�extendiug dvar We€Ian�� i�i31IZ�=ele�ated.scrSfrcr4e�stilyz�a
anin Um,af 3 fe446deifie flatland snbs' WV6 Prevenitotal shM4 afvepetat on, "sttaW
& other e.16lne#lt5 & di(W48tL` .liYltlt'I 1#t<.
t aegeY itieo?u si$rst ciil aw
�iztfce�r�l
effused fleret�y, v�it�9ut expense to fhe
Approval ofthesteudvre is used on"iletez�tl�tat nits il�aftf e�� tvQSpd: tae o.
obstmegon tomavik4fibnx The siivature be dairiaged }r "waX was orkp iq;, esselfi:
issbanae ofYhss pertutt should nade tbwtu'e as zeievin the pet uttgo oftalon faro sr St ?s
to t'usnretfi� slrlic£1i1�a�idmsid"ted k�4aFs tttttint�%� iamagpzt"TSB C�a'v� L�7asii.
`fhe au horiza Striietilre aoci;mwooi totl avtl�itt+ [nti si oku� a e i#1 e pUbl 's
tt f etz$vz ztlaa oz�all %a a s o f L7 ika Stems, Igo t utptvviJT lxe
i e,p9et Cteq to pkeY t theiuIl a l,%ee uag b the lta Q s11:` vtpab am 4 Qr 4po-nt
ta"tk auth d �x reasanrather tbap s
xaq# asspe�d * the plans attuahed to thz� perDai% nq etzpavatcon, fll;on
i4ecliaptzgiiinn¢ 1 a9tt es,� it8%eplaceOgWbmeinthe construottonor
m aintenaite -off this p gleaf,•zu swh amauRw--as-fo::impair nednal>i%ovm and chvW t onpatt&ts
w hlu Ns* rs ar Weflands or to reduce,,then each of -waters &4diarids.
If# Exeapt as authorlaed by Ns permit or anj i S CI aPP sictvatl tioMaatift to 116
permit, no excava&1,.ftll.or,mZo laud-olearxi%gaetzuitfesshaif t�tk ulnae at-afmtrftiz

�3-
thd-,coii§tku6gotL.ot-n a nfdnatoe of this project, Within waters or wetlands.
nds. Th - isipermit does not
authorize temporary'placement or double handling of excavated or fill within waters or
wetlan6 -outside the, permitted area, This prohibitibir appjteq to all borrow and fin activities
connected with this'prqj'ect.
If. All mechanized`equipment will'be-regularlyJnspeeted and maintained to prevent
contamination.of waters -and wctland-s-fromtf4cjs3� lubricants, hydraulic ffuids,ior other'toxi r,
materials., hift event of kspill of pettolquMproducts;or any., other.hazafd6us Waste, the
permitted shall 4immediatply report-'itto the-N.C, Division of Wat& Rc§our6ds'-atL(qjq) 735.-5083'
Ext. SZO,pr (800) OQ-T956 and provisions of the North Carolina Oil.Po . llutiori and llaiardou§
Substances, ControlAct, will be followed.
'12'. uniessoth6rwise-authorizedbytlii-s,pbin3it,all.fdlmaterial placed imwate"rsor
wetlandsshallfiegenerated-from'ainuplandsource. and will be_ clean and free of any pollutants
dxceptift trace qdadtitiesi Mdtdpfodurts,brg�aficinateiials(including deb,ri4�fi'omland .eleari-ug
activities), or, undilifly debris Will I notbe used.
while. accomplishing the authorized work, he will immediately notify the Wilmington District
Engineer who will initiate thp.rpquited coordination procedures,
14. The permittee shall require its contractors and/or agents to comply with the terms
and conditions ofthis perraiHn the construction and indintenance.of this project, and shall
provide each of its contractors and/or agent associated With the coristfuction,or maintenance of
this project wi q,copy of this A copy of this permit, inchiditig all conditions, shall be
available at the project site during construction and maintenance. of this project.
15. The pdrmitteeshall drdplo-y all sedimentation and erosion cbntrotmcasures
necessary. to pfe'v6ut all increase 'msedimentation or turbidity within waf&sand wetlands, outside
the,peimitarea. Thi8,,sll4u,ihcliide,but:igif6t:limiitdio,..the.immsdiato-,in-stafl'at.iono.fs.ilt.fencing,
of similar appropriate devices around all areas subjected soil disturbance or the movement of
earthen fill, and the immediate stabilization of all disturbed areas. Additionally,, the projectmust
remain mi,full. compliance with all aspects,of the Sedimentation Pbllutloir Coiitxol Act of 1973
(North Carolina General Statutes Chapter 1-13A Article 4).
1,6. The activity Will be conducted in such a manner as to prevent a signif[cant met -ease'
in turbidity outside the area.of 'construction or construction -related discharge. Increases such -that
h t 'turbi inthe.water0 b dyis.50,NTUs or,less .in all riversmot designated astrdut.w.atefs by
e -
the North Carolina Division. of Envirohmeiitil',Matiagdijrient'(NCDEN4), 25 NTUs or, less in all
saltwater classes and in all lakes and reservoirs, and I 69tUs, or less, in trout waters, are not,
considered significadt.

-4-
17. - Thepexmi . Me, upon rewipt-of anot I i I ce-cifteyopation of this perraft Qrupon.its
expiration before completion of the work will, withourexpense totho United States and in.such;
time and mannekas tht,Seeretary of theArmyor his authorized representative may direct, restore
tile water, Or, wetland to, its pre-prgica ponclitim
18. Violafioris-of these conditions or violations of Section 404 of the Clean Water Apt or
Section TO of the.Rivers aAclll ors Aqtmqsv-be reppriedin witing to the Wilmington;District
V,S,;Army Corps of Engineers withW74hours of pernittees-discoyery of the -violation.
Questions qr:comments;mav�bc�addressed�to,Mf-Tyler Crumbley� WilmingfohMad
'Offlree,,Xegul telephoneni�,,'10) 251-4170.
Sincerely,
Tyler Crunibley, Project Manager
Wilmington Regulatory Field. Office
I Copies Furnished,
W,'Yaren ffiggins
Division of Water ltqsqwces,
North CaxoUna Department of
Environmental Qua lity
1650:Maii.SeMee Center
Raleigh, N. or& Carolina 27.6071650'
i , . - .
la petel�drlj.
U.S.. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office tox,-33726
Raleigh, -NoithCarolina, 27636-3720
Nli. FritzRoh
National Marine Fisheries Service
Habitat Conservation Service
Pivers Island
Bcaufbit,North Carolina 28516:

ma
It The
tunetc1,:alina's Elie Deere
the'Wau, ip FP,
orupamN
i* and jumt
layvdh irestm",
ge&toAfr.-Tyler, L umbIW dining a
telephone 25.141M
cmnlhle t4l rojectu'anqer
WAM mggio I
D QfW
NOg#; Qgq4naDeparrmentof.
Environmental Quality -
1fiSQ':1V1'a�;Seruieo Center
Rd &ghXortlf Mina. 11 6-4�.-,16 5 0-
-W Paelid#$ nia.
'U-S Vm-tm
�" iffalea
Vomf OM"WCM -
Vials zg�i, No44 Ca` bw* MOM
Its vla
Naftanat Mazme Fish
eries vice
-
90# 0owervatios-Service
Piyers Iffand
BeaufbfiNoxth-Qirdliva USK
or

-5-
Mr,.Nce Wilbef
NatidrM MaifixeFishexms;Servidg
Habitat Conservation -Division
219 Fort Johnson Road
Charleston, South Carolina 29412-9M
Mr.:Todd,Allea Bowers•
USJBP I ARogio n. 4 Lde Suientist
WaterProt'ecti onDivis Division
61 For§3*Sfreei, SW
Atlanta, . Georgia 303034960
D,r - : Chad Coburn
Division of Wafer Resources'%
North Carolina Department of
Environmer.itg QualitY,
127 Cskdirid,Dfive,Exfens!bn
Wilruington, Norfh Carolina, 284o5,

Eta
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP tin
Environmental Consultants
January 6, 2017
NC Department of Transportation
c/o Mr. Mason Hemdon
5501 Barbados Blvd.
Castle Hayne, NC 28429
RE: Application for CAMA Major Permit, Grand View Community Boating Facility
202 Summer Rest Road, Wilmington, NC
Dear Mr. Hemdon,
This letter serves to notify the NCDOT of proposed modifications to the Grand View Community dock
located at 202 Summer Rest Road, Wilmington, NC. Bailey and Associates, Inc. has submitted an
application for a NC CAMA Major Permit to the NC Division of Coastal Management (DCM). The
applicant is requesting to add a fixed pier and gazebo on Motts Creek and to expand the existing dock
to provide a total of ten boat slips. No dredging is proposed. As an adjacent riparian property owner to
the property, you are required by the application process to be notified. You were previously notified
and are being re -notified following changes to the application package.
A copy of the CAMA permit application (narrative, application forms and figures) as it has been
accepted by the NC DCM is enclosed. If you have any comments on the project, they can be directed
to Ms. Debbie Wilson, NC DCM,127 Cardinal Drive Ext., Wilmington, NC, 28405 or 910-796-7266. No
comment within 30-days of receipt of this package indicates no objection. I am happy to answer any
questions you may have regarding the enclosed materials and can be reached at 910452-0001.
Sincerely,
Steve Morrison
Environmental Consultant
cc: Ms. Debbie Wilson, NC DCM
RECEIVED
JUN 19 2017
DCM- MHD CITY
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON. NC
UAN 0 6 2017
www.lmgroup.net • [e-mail] • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Ave., Suite 15, Wilmington, NC 28403 • P.O. Box 2522, Wilmington,
NC 28402

LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP nic
Environmental Consultants
January 6, 2017
John and Eliza Blackwell
230 N Elm Street Suite 2000
Greensboro, NC 27401
RE: Application for CAMA Major Permit, Grand View Community Boating Facility
202 Summer Rest Road, Wilmington, NC
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Blackwell,
This letter serves to notify you of proposed modifications to the Grand View Community dock located at
202 Summer Rest Road, Wilmington, NC. Bailey and Associates, Inc. has submitted an application
requesting a NC CAMA Major Permit to the NC Division of Coastal Management (DCM). The applicant
is requesting to add a fixed pier and gazebo on Motts Creek and to expand the existing docking to
provide a total of ten boat slips. No dredging is proposed. As an adjacent riparian property owner to
the property, you are required by the permit application process to be notified. You were previously
notified and are being re -notified following minor changes to the application package.
A copy of the CAMA permit application (narrative, application forms and figures) as it has been
accepted by the NC DCM is enclosed. If you have any comments on the project, they can be directed
to Ms. Debbie Wilson, NC DCM, 127 Cardinal Drive Ext., Wilmington, NC, 28405 or 910-796-7266. No
comment within 30-days of receipt of this package indicates no objection. I am happy to answer any
questions you may have regarding the enclosed materials and can be reached at 910452-0001.
Sincerely,
Steve Morrison
Environmental Consultant
cc: Ms. Debbie Wilson, NC DCM
RECEIVED
JUN 19 2017
DCM- MHD CITY
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
JAN 0 6 2017
www.lmgroup.net • [e-mail] • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Ave., Suite 15, Wilmington, NC 28403 • P.O. Box 2522, Wilmington,
NC 28402

Coastal Management
ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY
June 15, 2017
Land Management Group, Inc.
c/o Steve Morrison
3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15
Wilmington, NC 29403
Dear Mr. Morrison:
ROY COOPER
Gwenror
MICHAEL REGAN
semwry
BRAXTON DAVIS
Uirecmr
The Division of Coastal Management hereby acknowledges receipt of your application, acting as
agent for Bailey and Associates, Inc., for State approval for development of the subject property located
at 202 Summer Rest Road, in Wilmington, New Hanover County. It was received as complete on June 9,
2017 and appears to be adequate for processing at this time. The projected deadline for making a decision
is August 23, 2017. An additional 75-day review period is provided by law when such time is necessary
to complete the review. If you have not been notified of a final action by the initial deadline stated above,
you should consider the review period extended. Under those circumstances, this letter will serve as your
notice of an extended review. However, an additional letter will be provided on or about the 75th day.
If this. agency does not render a permit decision within 70 days from June 9, 2017, you may
request a meeting with the Director of the Division of Coastal Management and permit staff to discuss the
status of your project. Such a meeting will be held within five working days from the receipt of your
written request and shall include the property owner, developer, and project designer/consultant.
NCGS 113A-119(b) requires that Notice of an application be posted at the location of the
proposed development. Enclosed you will find a "Notice of Permit Filing" postcard which must be
posted at the property of your proposed development. You should post this notice at a conspicuous point
along your property where it can be observed from a public road. Some examples would be: Nailing the
notice card to a telephone pole or tree along the road right-of-way fronting your property; or at a point
along the road right-of-way where a private road would lead one into your property. Failure to post this
notice could result in an incomplete application.
An onsite inspection will be made, and if additional information is required, you will be contacted
by the appropriate State or Federal agency. Please contact me if you have any questions and notify me in
writing if you wish to receive a copy of my field report and/or comments from reviewing agencies.
Sincere RECEIVED
J-4�� JUN 19 2017
Brooks Surgan
Field Representative DCM- M H D CITY
cc: Heather Coats, DCM Tyler Crmnbley, USACE
Doug Huggett, DCM Debra Wilson, DCM
Chris Bailey, Applicant Chad Coburn, DWR
Tony Wilson, Wrightsville Beach Linda Painter, New Hanover County
Kathryn Thurston, City of Wilmington
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive Ext. Wilmington NC 28405
9107%7215 T

N �C
Coastal Management
ENVIRONMENTAL t1UAIJ7Y
August 18, 2017
✓Land Management Group, Inc.
c/o Mr. Steve Morrison
3805 Wrightsville Ave., Suite 15
Wilmington, NC 28403
Dear Mr. Morrison:
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
secrewry
BRAXTON C. DAVIS
Director
This letter is with reference to your application for a Coastal Area Management Act Major
Development permit, acting as agent for Grand View Holdings, LLC, to undertake
development activities at property adjacent to the AIWW, at 202 Summer Rest Road, in
Wilmington, New Hanover County.
Although processing of the application is nearing completion, additional time is needed for
this office to complete the review and make a decision on your request. Therefore, it is
necessary that the standard review time be extended. An additional 75 days is provided by
G.S. 113A-122(c) which would make November 6, 2017, the new deadline for reaching a
decision on your request. However, we expect to take action prior to that time and will do
so as soon as possible. In the interim, if you have any question on the status of your
application, do not hesitate to contact me by phone [phone] or e-mail at:
[e-mail].
cc: Wilmington/MHC Files
Tyler Crumbley, USACE
Chad Coburn, DWR
Sincerely,
O��c>l�c CvwrJ
Heather Coats
Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
RECEIVE®
SEP 2 8 2017
CCM- MHD CITY
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Coastal Management
Wilmington Office 1127 Cardinal Drive Extension I Wilmington. North Carolina 28405
9107%7215

Coastal Management
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
September 25, 2017
Mr. John Wessell, III
Wessell & Raney, L.L.P.
PO Box 1049
Wilmington, NC 28402
Email: [e-mail]
Dear Mr. Wessell:
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
secteary
BRAXTON C. DAVIS
DlrecW
This letter is in response to your correspondence, which was received by the Division of Coastal Management on
June 23, 2017, regarding the Town of Wrightsville Beach's concerns about the proposed development by Grandview
Holdings, LLC/ Chris Bailey, at 202 Summer Rest Road, adjacent to the AIWW, in Wilmington, New Hanover County.
The proposed project consisted of a community docking facility. The proposed project has been determined to
comply with the Rules of the Coastal Resources Commission and as such, a permit has been issued to authorize the
development. I have enclosed a copy of the permit.
If you wish to contest our decision to issue this permit, you may file a request for a Third Party Appeal. The Chairman
of the Coastal Resources Commission will consider each case and determine whether to grant your request to file for
a Contested Case Hearing. The hearing request must be filed with the Director, Division of Coastal Management, in
writing and must be received within twenty (20) days of the disputed permit decision. Please contact me at (910) 796-
7302 if you would like me to send you the applicable fortes and instructions that must be filed prior to that deadline or
if you have any additional questions. Alternatively, the fortes can also be found on our website.
Respectfully yours,
,' t4 Cv,zel
Heather Coats
Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
Cc: Wilmington Files
Morehead Files RECEIVED
Tim Owens, Town of Wrightsville Beach
SEP $ 8 2017
Dcm- �►,
State of North Carolina I Environmernal Quality I Coastal Management
Wfhnhyton Office 1 127 Cardinal Drive Extension I Wilmington, North Carolina 28405
910 796 7215

LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP mc.
Environmental Consultants
8/3/17
Heather Coats
Division of Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, N.C. 28405-3845
Re: Grand View Community Boating Facility, 202 Summer Rest Road, AIWW, New
Hanover County
Dear Heather,
This letter is in response to the 6/28/17 comments provided by Mark Zeigler of the NC
Department of Commerce, Rural Economic Development Division regarding the proposed
Grand View Community Boating Facility located at 202 Summer Rest Road along the AIWW.
The primary concern within the comment letter refers to the potential for bottom scour based on
the size of the boats that could use the proposed facility and their related drafts in relation to the
NEI, which is buried under the existing bottom. The application materials listed the typical boat
lengths at the facility to range from 8' and 66'. As a point of clarification, the 66' length was
used based on the fact that there now exists a permitted 66' long floating dock which will be
replaced in its same dimension parallel to and facing the AIWW as part of the proposed facility.
In addition, the replaced 66' floating dock will be rotated to a position further out toward the
AIWW channel and in deeper water than the current location. The remaining proposed side -to
docking areas are shorter and away from the location of the NEI.
Please contact me with any questions related to this response. Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Steve Morrison
Environmental Consultant
Cc: Debbie Wilson
Grand View Holdings, LLC
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
AUG 14 2017
www.lmgroup.net • [e-mail] • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Ave., Suite 15, Wilmington, NC 28403 • P.O. Box 2522, Wilmington, NC 28402

Surgan, Brooks R
From: Mairs, Robb L
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2017 8:30 AM
To: Wilson, Debra; Surgan, Brooks R; Coats, Heather
Subject: FW: Bailey and Associates: Grand View Community Marina, Summer Rest Road
fyi
From: John Blackwell[mailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2017 8:28 AM
To: Mairs, Robb L<[e-mail]> ;n
Cc: [e-mail]�.
Subject: Bailey and Associates: Grand View Community Marina, Summer Rest Road �G��NG�`
�GM0\v % 1p�1
Robb, 0
On January 6" we were notified of Chris Bailey' s newest intentions to strong arm us all
into increasing the size of his dock on Summer Rest Rd. I can' t help myself but to think
about my neighbors comments abought that pier almost 10 yrs. ago. "John, it' s in stone,
that pier is limited to 2 slips max. No exceptions at all" . Our position hasn't
changed..
o The project is right on top of an active sewer line
o The riparian rights lines aren' t even drawn correctly
o The DOT has right of way over most of this project
o Those who use the public boat ramp are constantly circling in
these waters while they wait to take their boat out.
o The first Gazebo blocks access to many who constantly bait fish on
that creek
o The traffic (boat and car) in that area is already too heavy...
o The project restricts our egress/regress to our slips at low tide
when you consider the oyster bed.
It' s simply too big for this site and will not be received well by Wrightsville Beach,
the DOT and the people that have used these waters recreationally for years. ***Please see
that whomever is in charge of making a final decision on this case personally visit this
site. They will see immediately what we are all concerned about. There are no positives
imbedded in this project at all.. RECEIVED
JUN 19 2017
DCM- MHD CITY

Thank you for looking out for us !
John and Eliza Blackwell, direct neighbor to the north..
F�6
RECEIVED
JUN 19 2017
DCNI- MHD CITY
2

nP%L
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
H I G H F ILL. 2703 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 201
INFRASTRUCTURE Cary, North Carolina 27518
ENGINEERING, P.C. Tel[phone] Fax[phone]
To: Tim W. Owens, AICP
Town Manager, .
Town of Wrightsville Beach
321 Causeway Drive
Wrightsville Beach, NC 28480
Date: June 14, 2017
From: J. Chris Ford, PE
Copies:
Proj. No.:
NC Finn License No. C-2586
N/A
TWB1701
Subject: Northeast Interceptor Segment 1 Intracoastal Waterway Crossing Preliminary Assessment
Section 1 - Introduction
1.1 Background
The Northeast Interceptor (NEI) Sewer System consists of two (2) segments. Segment I conveys
wastewater from Wrightsville Beach Pump Station No. 1 (WB PS # 1) to Cape Fear Public Utility Authority
Pump Station 35 (CFPUA PS #35). Segment 2 (NEI2) conveys wastewater from CFPUA PS #35 to CFPUA
wastewater treatment facilities.
NEII was constructed for the Town of Wrightsville Beach with start-up around 1983. Wrightsville Beach
Pump Station No. 5 (WB PS #5) was constructed in the mid 1990's and connected to NEII. A 14-inch force
main extends from WB PS 41, along North Lumina Avenue, Lagoon Drive, and West Salisbury Street;
beneath the Intracoastal Waterway (ICW); along Eastwood Road, Wrightsville Avenue, and Military
Cutoff; beneath Bradley Creek; along Oleander Drive; and into the CFPUA's wastewater pump station.
NEI2 was constructed for New Hanover County with start-up in September 1983. Immediately following
construction, one half ownership of NEI2 was transferred to the City of Wilmington, who was responsible
for operation and maintenance. The conditions of the agreement were established in interlocal agreements
between the City, New Hanover County, and the Town of Wrightsville Beach. NEI2 is now owned,
operated, and maintained by the CFPUA.
Due to recent (2005) and past failures ofNEI2, the City of Wilmington commissioned a study to evaluate
the condition, capacity, and reliability ofNEI2. The study was undertaken with the support of New Hanover
County and the Town of Wrightsville Beach. The purpose of the study was to recommend improvements
to the system that will provide adequate future capacity and ensure a high level of reliability.
Due to similar failures and reliability concerns with NEII, the Town of Wrightsville Beach commissioned
a study to evaluate the condition and reliability of NEI1. The purpose of the study was to recommend
improvements that would provide a high level of reliability. Improved reliability reduces failures and
provides a system that maintains the public health and confidence.
r,EC : .VED
UGIVI W1Liti11NGTnN, NC
Engineering is our profession. Service is our passion. J vL 3 2017

Page
qjq
NEI1 ICW CrossmgAss m n2
To meet these objectives, three primary study components were identified including:
1. a pipeline condition assessment,
2. an operational evaluation,
3. and a criticality assessment.
A Preliminary Engineering Report (PER) was prepared in 2006 that provided guidance for implementing
recommendations that would improve the reliability of the NEI 1 system.
1.2 2006 NEI1 Condition Assessment
Because the force main is ductile iron except at subaqueous waterway crossings, the primary. concern was
degradation of the metal due to internal microbial induced corrosion (MIC) and the resulting loss of pipe
wall thickness, which could result in a pipe failure. Ultrasonic testing was performed using a handheld
ultrasonic thickness gage to determine the thickness of the pipe wall, and thereby the condition, of the pipe.
Ultrasonic testing utilizes the principle of known sound wave velocity through a material to measure
thickness.
The profile of the force main was plotted based on construction record drawings. Ultrasonic testing was
Performed at locations with a higher probability of corrosion. These locations included high spots where
air and hydrogen sulfide gas can accumulate and remain if air release valves (ARVs) are not functioning
properly, and gravity flow and transitional areas of the pipeline where the pipe is partially full during
operation and relatively empty when the pump station is not operating.
Ultrasonic testing was performed at the 17 sites depicted in "Figure 4.2 — NEI Segment I Rehabilitation
and Replacement" from the PER included as Appendix A. Each test site is color coded to reflect the level
of corrosion and the urgency of rehabilitation or repair. Because the focus of the study was on pipe with
MIC, plastic pipe and areas of the force main that always remained full did not require investigation.
Therefore, there was no reason to assess the condition of the subaqueous ICW crossings.
For additional information on the history of NEII and the results of that study, see "Northeast Interceptor
Segment I Preliminary Engineering Report, Town of Wrightsville Beach, NC,
December 20, 2006. " by Ford and Highfill,
1.3 ICW Crossing Assessment
Given the age, the uncertain location and condition, and the critical nature of the NEI1 ICW Crossing, the
Town desires an assessment to proactively evaluate and maintain the condition of the crossing to protect
the environment and public. The ICW Crossing study includes the following tasks:
1. Locate the pipe where it is readily accessible (5-6 feet deep) to determine the alignment.
2. Confirm the pipe material.
3. Assess the pipe condition.
The ICW Crossing Assessment is the first phase of a three-phase project. Phase 2 consists of the design and
permitting of a replacement, or redundant ICW Crossing. Phase 3 will consist of bid and construction phase
services if the Town elects to proceed.

NE11
To meet these objectives, three primary study components were identified including:
I. a pipeline condition assessment,
2• an operational evaluation,
3. and a criticality assessment.
115
A Preliminary Engineering Report (PER) was prepared in 2006 that provided guidance for implementing
recommendations that would improve the reliability of the NEI 1 system.
1.2 2006 NEI1 Condition Assessment
Because the force main is ductile iron except at subaqueous waterway crossings, the primary concern was
degradation of the metal due to internal microbial induced corrosion (MIC) and the resulting loss of pipe
wall thickness, which could result in a pipe failure. Ultrasonic testing was performed using a handheld
ultrasonic thickness gage to determine the thickness of the pipe wall, and thereby the condition, of the pipe.
Ultrasonic testing utilizes the principle of known sound wave velocity through a material to measure
thickness.
The profile of the force main was plotted based on construction record drawings. Ultrasonic testing was
Performed at locations with a higher probability of corrosion. These locations included high spots where
air and hydrogen sulfide gas can accumulate and remain if air release valves (ARVs) are not functioning
Properly, and gravity flow and transitional areas of the pipeline where the pipe is partially full during
operation and relatively empty when the pump station is not operating.
Ultrasonic testing was performed at the 17 sites depicted in "Figure 4.2 — NEI Segment 1 Rehabilitation
and Replacement" from the PER included as Appendix A. Each test site is color coded to reflect the level
of corrosion and the urgency of rehabilitation or repair. Because the focus of the study was l pipe with
WC, plastic pipe and areas of the force main that always remained full did not require investigation.
Therefore, there was no reason to assess the condition of the subaqueous ICW crossings,
For additional information on the history of NE
Segment 1 Preliminary Engineering Report I1 and the results of that study, see "Northeast Interceptor
Town of Wrightsville Beach, NC," by Ford and Mghfill,
December 20, 2006.
1.3 ICW Crossing Assessment
Given the age, the uncertain location and condition, and the critical nature of the NEI1 ICW Crossing, the
Town desires an assessment to proactively evaluate and maintain the condition of the crossing to protect
the environment and public. The ICW Crossing study includes the following tasks:
I. Locate the pipe where it is readily accessible (5-6 feet deep) to determine the ali
2. Confirm the pipe material. gnment.
3. Assess the pipe condition.
The ICW Crossing Assessment is the first phase of a three-phase project. Phase 2 consists of the design and
Permitting of a replacement, or redundant ICW Crossing. Phase 3 will consist of bid and construction phase
services if the Town elects to proceed.

Technical Memorandum
Page 3
NEI] ICW Crossing Assessment
Section 2 - Intracoastal Waterway Crossing Preliminary
Assessment
2.1 Document Review
Documentation related to NEI1 was compiled from various sources for review with the Town. The
following documents were compiled.
1. Sanitary Sewer Improvements Pumping Station & Force Main, Henry Von Oesen & Associates,
January 1982, Plans and Specifications. (NEI 1 Design Plans)
2. WB Bailey pier easement, May 27, 1982.
3. NEI 1 Preliminary Engineering Report (Condition Assessment), Ford & Highfill, December 20,
2006.
4. NEI Segment 1 Improvements Project, Ford, March 2007.
5. Kenan Creek Horizontal Directional Drill, Ford, September 2008, Plans and Specifications.
6. Pump Stations 1 and 5 Improvements Project, Ford, May 2009, Plans and Specifications (Not
Constructed)
7. Sanitary Sewer Condition Assessment and Rehabilitation, FY 2010-2011, Ford, 2611, Plans and
Specifications.
8. Existing pier information provided by the Town in 2011.
9. Lift Station 5 Replacement Study, HIGHFILL, Ford, June 26, 2015.
10. SEPI Preliminary Drawings of the proposed pier and locations of NEIL
11. SEPI letter (Greg Thompson) to Tim Owens, CAMA Major Permit, July 28, 2016.
12. SEPI letter (Greg Thompson) to Tim Owens, CAMA Major Permit, August 24, 2016.
13. LMG CAMA Major Permit Application, Bailey and Associates, Inc. Grand View Community
Boating Facility, Mott's Creek/AIWW, New Hanover County, January 6, 2017.
2.2 Kickoff Workshop
A kickoff workshop was held March 3, 2017 to initiate the condition assessment; identify the project
drivers, goals, and objectives; review the history of the NEI1; and discuss available condition assessment
methods. The following goals and objectives were identified by the Town:
1. The primary goal is to ensure that there is at least one ICW Crossing that is in acceptable
condition.
2. If the condition of the existing pipe is acceptable, the Town may not want a redundant crossing.
The Town may decide to design another crossing so they are prepared to install it if necessary in
the future.
3. The Town is considering transferring their utilities to the CFPUA. The Town indicated that the
CFPUA wants a redundant crossing if they take the utilities. The Town expects that they will
likely have to at least design it, though they may not build it.

Technical Memorandum
Page 4
NEII ICW Crossing Assessment
2.3 Field Observations
2.3.1 Excavation of Pipe and Transition and Anchor Block
On April 11, 2017, a TA Loving crew excavated the ICW crossing on the west side of the ICW. The
transition/anchor block was located approximately 33 feet east of the isolation valve. The top of the
transition and anchor block was excavated enough to visually verify the top of the concrete. Due to the
depth, the excavation was not extended down to the pipe at that location. The depth of the block was
approximately 5-6 feet, which is deeper than shown on the construction drawings.
Photograph 2.1 — Excavation of the transition/anchor block on the west bank of the ICW
Approximately 8 feet to the east of the transition and anchor block, the pipe was excavated and the material
was determined to be HDPE. The depth to the top of the pipe was 8-9 feet. There was a steady flow of water
along the pipe which is likely attributable to high tide, which occurred around 12:30 pm, the same time the
pipe was exposed.

Technical Memorandum
Page 4_
NEII ICW Crossing Assessment
2.3 Field Observations
2.3.1 Excavation of Pipe and Transition and Anchor Block
On April 11, 2017, a TA Loving crew excavated the ICW crossing on the west side of the ICW. The
transition/anchor block was located approximately 33 feet east of the isolation valve. The top of the
transition and anchor block was excavated enough to visually verify the top of the concrete. Due to the
depth, the excavation was not extended down to the pipe at that location. The depth of the block was
approximately 5-6 feet, which is deeper than shown on the construction drawings.
Approximately 8 feet to the east of the transition and anchor block, the pipe was excavated and the material
was determined to be HDPE. The depth to the top of the pipe was 8-9 feet. There was a steady flow of water
along the pipe which is likely attributable to high tide, which occurred around 12:30 pm, the same time the
pipe was exposed.

IA { 1 ",¢ R .f� r 4 •' :ll
MI
i f.49

e
w
1 F�
•
I r
oo��
t
i
,L

Technical Memorandum
Page 7
NEU ICWCrossingAssessment
2.3.3 Subaqueous Force Main Location and Inspection
Southeast Diving Services, LLC (SEDS) was on -site from April 17 to April 25, 2017 to locate the NEI1
ICW Crossing. Their goal was to provide horizontal and vertical (where possible) location of the
subaqueous force main. SEDS was also tasked with spot checking the pipe for leaks.
Location of the force main in shallow areas was performed with a probe. Rods were set along the alignment
for location by survey. Where the water deepened, divers located the force main with a probe and placed a
weight on the ground above the force main. A buoy was attached to the weight with a rope of sufficient
length for the buoy to bob on the surface. The buoys were located by the surveyor during the changing of
the tides when the current stopped flowing and the buoys were relatively stationary.
Photograph 2.5 —Diver about to enter the water Photograph 2.6 —Survey of pipe markers
Photograph 2.7- NEI1 Force Main locate and survey operations from east side of ICW

Technical Memorandum
Page 8
NEII ICW Crossing Assessment
Figure 2.1 shows the location of the force main per the design drawings and the location as marked by
SEDS and surveyed. The elevation was not obtained along deeper portions of the alignment due to the
difficulty to accurately survey the elevation with the effects of the wind and the current on the rod boat, and
personnel.
Observations of merit from the location and survey include the following:
I. The force main was noted to be HDPE with a circumference of 20.25 inches. Therefore, the pipe
has an outside diameter of 16 inches and is 16-inch IPS HDPE.
2. The force main was partially exposed (top 15-25%) between the 3'a and 5ie anchor blocks on the
west side of the waterway. SEDS did not report the pipe to be exposed at any other location.
3. SEDS reported a pier piling installed within 3 inches of the force main. See Figure 2.2 for the
surveyed location of pilings and the pipe.
4. SEDS reported that the force main had only 4 to 5 inches of cover in the navigational channel.

Technical Memorandum
Page 8
NEI1 ICW Crossing Assessment
Figure 2.1 shows the location of the force main per the design drawings and the Iodation as marked by
SEDS and surveyed. The elevation was not obtained along deeper portions of the alignment due to the
difficulty to accurately survey the elevation with the effects of the wind and the current on the rod boat, and
personnel.
Observations of merit from the location and survey include the following:
1. The force main was noted to be HDPE with a circumference of 20.25 inches. Therefore, the pipe
has an outside diameter of 16 inches and is 16-inch IPS HDPE.
2. The force main was partially exposed (top 15-25%) between the Yd and 51` anchor blocks on the
west side of the waterway. SEDS did not report the pipe to be exposed at any other location.
3. SEDS reported a pier piling installed within 3 inches of the force main. See Figure 2.2 for the
surveyed location of pilings and the pipe.
4. SEDS reported that the force main had only 4 to 5 inches of cover in the navigational channel

Technical Memorandum
Page 9
NEII ICW Crossing Assessment
Figure 2.2 — Proximity of Pipe to Pier Pilings
The 4- to 5-inch depth noted by the divers could indicate one of the following:
1. that the fill above the pipe has washed out to elevation -17.5
2. that the force main was installed shallower than designed
3. a combination of the two
Figure 2.3 below indicates a top of pipe elevation of -18.0 and a channel bottom elevation of -15.5.
The USACE hydrographic survey from November 2016 (Figure 2.4) indicates that depths in proximity to
the crossing range from elevation -14 to elevation -23. The conditions are likely not static and change as
currents and flows change.

Technical Memorandum
Page 9
NEII ICW Crossing Assessment
The 4- to 5-inch depth noted by the divers could indicate one of the following:
1. that the fill above the pipe, has washed out to elevation -17.5
2. that the force main was installed shallower than designed
3. a combination of the two
Figure 2.3 below indicates a top of pipe elevation of -18.0 and a channel bottom elevation of -15.5.
The USACE hydrographic survey from November 2016 (Figure 2.4) indicates that depths in proximity to
the crossing range from elevation -14 to elevation -23. The conditions are likely not static and change as
currents and flows change.

Technical Memorandum
Page 10
NEII ICW Crossing Assessment
Figure 2.3 - Partial Profile of ICW Crossing as Designed'
77,
�--h-.�&I�JIG6i,7 j�^F^
�=1-�-�#
�. n s'
,
•
."F::T"
; ,'Y`_f
-�`
.l�r�-Y•--�""3
t 1�— ( ,� ..%.�h..t
is 1
i
.— tit
-
4 ' ' S i
'- Approximate profile
T• ICW Channel based on
'
t c t
locate Aord 2017
;
t
it
NOTE SEE SIT;2j �
Design Plan Sheet 5 is provided in Appendix B.
2.4 Dredging in Proximity to the Crossing'
Due to concerns that dredging could damage the force main, Todd Horton' with the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) was contacted to investigate future dredging plans in proximity to the crossing.
Mr. Horton noted the following on May 15, 2017: "The maximum authorized depth the Corps can dredge
the ICW is to -14 feet deep, so as long as your utility is at least 20 feet deep, there should be no issues. We
currently have no plans to dredge this area and have not dredged it since the mid-1990s. Per our last
survey, which was conducted in November 2016, depths on both sides of the bridge range from -14 feet to
-23 feet deep. "
Figure 2.4 is a portion of "US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrographic Survey Atlantic Coastal Waterway
Beaufort to Cape Fear River Section 4 / Tangents 4-5" which is included as Appendix C.
"Sanitary Sewer Improvements, Pumping Station & Force Main, Town of Wrightsville Beach North Carolina",
Henry Von Oesen & Associates Consulting Engineers & Planners, Wilmington, North Carolina, Sheet 5, 1977.
2 Todd Horton, Chief, Geospatial Services Section, District GIS Coordinator, Navigation Branch, Wilmington District,
US Army Corps of Engineers, [e-mail].

Technical Memorandum
Page 11
NEII ICW Crossing Assessment
Figure 2.4— USACE Hydrographic Survey at the NEI1 ICW Crossing (November 2016)
2.5 Past Operational Issues
In late December of 2013 and early January 2014, the Town experienced periodic pressure surges at WB
PS # 1. Mike Vukelich, Director of Public Works, stated that "the pressures increase for no apparent reason
and have in the past been high for extended periods of time: We don't understand the reason for the spikes. "
In an email dated February 21, 2014, Mike stated "The system stabilized at normal pressures for a few
weeks but now as can be seen in the second graph, pressures randomly increased in some type ofpattern?
(cannot identi)� the cause). "
To our knowledge, the Town was never able to resolve the source of the surges. Based on the pressure
graphs (included as Appendix D), it appears that something would partially clog the pipe, resulting in an
increase of pressure. It would then clear and the pressures would return to normal, and then cycle again.

Technical Memorandum
Page 11
NEI1 ICW Crossing Assessment
2.5 Past Operational Issues.
In late December of 2013 and early January 2014, the Town experienced periodic pressure surges at WB
PS # 1. Mike Vukelich, Director of Public Works, stated that "the pressures increase for no apparent reason
and have in the past been high for extended periods of time: We don't understand the reason for the spikes. "
In an email dated February 21, 2014, Mike stated "The system stabilized at normal pressures for a few
weeks but now as can be seen in the second graph, pressures randomly increased in some type ofpattern?
(cannot ident fy the cause). "
To our knowledge, the Town was never able to resolve the source of the surges. Based on the pressure
graphs (included as Appendix D), it appears that something would partially clog the pipe, resulting in an
increase of pressure. It would then clear and the pressures would return to normal, and then cycle again.

Technical Memorandum
Page 12
NEII ICW Crossing Assessment
Section 3 - Findings
3.1 ICW Pipe Material
The NEII contract documents titled "Pump Station and Force Main, Town of Wrightsville Beach, North
Carolina, EPA Project C370565-01-2, January 1982" by Henry Von Oesen and Associates, Inc., stipulate
that the subaqueous force main piping shall be either ball joint ductile iron pipe or polyethylene pipe. They
further stipulate that the polyethylene pipe shall be Type PE-3408, 16-inch outside diameter, SDR-11, with
a working pressure of 160 psi. The drawings indicate 16-inch polyethylene pipe. High -density polyethylene
(HDPE) pipe was verified in the field.
14DPE was developed in 1951. The butt fusion welded joints and material characteristics have made it the
material of choice for installation via trenchless methods such as horizontal directional drilling (HDD) and
pipe bursting. The beneficial characteristics of HDPE pipe include the following:
1. Flexibility with a high tolerance to deformation due to its ability to withstand high tensile strains
without permanent deformation
2. Excellent chemical resistance (not subject to corrosion) to:
• naturally occurring chemicals found in soils
• many chemicals found in contaminated soils
• chemicals found within the wastewater system including hydrogen sulfide and sulfuric acid
3. Strength and toughness to withstand slow crack growth (SCG) and rapid crack propagation (RCP)
4. Good flow properties that provide minimal frictional resistance
5. Ease of joining by heat fusion that reduces the number of joints and the number of welded joints
6. Low temperature application with a long service life
3.1.1 Causes of Failure for Plastic Pipes3
Plastic pipe includes PVC (polyvinyl chloride), HDPE, and GRP (glass reinforced polymer). Plastic pipe
can fail for a variety of reasons. Failures are generally grouped into the following categories:
1. In situ and third -party damage (main cause of failure)
2. Construction and installation damage
3. Material deficiencies
4. Manufacturing defects
5. Inadequate design
6. Service and environmental conditions
'Inspection Guidelines for Wastewater Force Mains, Water Environment Research Foundation, Co -published by IWA
Publishing, Jason Consultants, LLC, 2010.

Technical Memorandum
Page 13
NEII ICW Crossing Assessment
3.1.2 Failure Modes for Plastic Pipes°
Failure modes for plastic pipes are provided in Table 3.1.
Table 3.1 — Failure Modes for Plastic
Leaks Primarily at joints and fittings
Physical failure Related to inherent defects in the pipe, damage during installation, and
impingement damage
Chemical breakdown Results from chemicals in the fluid, groundwater, and soils
Cracking HDPE has a large plastic phase making it less susceptible to cracking
Fatigue Occurs due to internal and external repeated or fluctuating stresses (loadings)
---- --- ---- - --- ..---- _ -- , I - -.......I ...---------
Buckling
I Results from static and dynamic compressive forces
3.1.3 Pipe Material Selection
HDPE material specifications and design parameters have been adjusted over the last 66 years to virtually
eliminate many failure modes'. HDPE was a good selection of pipe material for the ICW Crossing because
of its beneficial characteristics and the high unlikelihood of failure from those factors identified above.
3.2 ICW Crossing Alignment
The alignment of the existing ICW Crossing appears to differ slightly from the location shown on the design
drawings. In a few locations, the distance between the two alignments is 10-15 feet. This is likely the result
of imprecise installation and surveying associated with a subaqueous force main.
Third -party damage is the main cause of failure for HDPE, PVC, and asbestos cement (AC) pipet. It
represents 36% of the damage to non-ferrous sewer force mains'. Due to the shallow depth below the
navigational channel (4-5 inches), the partial exposure of the pipe in one location (15-25%), and the
proximity to development (3 inches from a pier piling); third -party damage is projected to be the most
significant threat to the existing ICW Crossing. Third -party damage could occur from the following actions:
1. Installation of pier pilings
2. Anchoring of boats, barges, etc.
3. Installation of other utilities
4. Dredging of the navigational channel
4Inspection Guidelines for Wastewater Force Mains, Water Environment Research Foundation, Co -published by IWA
Publishing, Jason Consultants, LLC, 2010.

Technical Memorandum
Page 13
NEI1 ICW Crossing Assessment
3.1.2 Failure Modes for Plastic Pipes4
Failure modes for plastic pipes are provided in Table 3.1.
Table 3.1 — Failure Modes for Plastic Pipe
3.1.3 Pipe Material Selection
HDPE material specifications and design parameters have been adjusted over the last 66 years to virtually
eliminate many failure modest. HDPE was a good selection of pipe material for the ICW Crossing because
of its beneficial characteristics and the high unlikelihood of failure from those factors identified above.
3.2 ICW Crossing Alignment
The alignment of the existing ICW Crossing appears to differ slightly from the location shown on the design
drawings. In a few locations, the distance between the two alignments is 10-15 feet. This is likely the result
of imprecise installation and surveying associated with a subaqueous force main.
Third -party damage is the main cause of failure for HDPE, PVC, and asbestos cement (AC) pipet. It
represents 36% of the damage to non-ferrous sewer force mains'. Due to the shallow depth below the
navigational channel (4-5 inches), the partial exposure of the pipe in one location (15-25%), and the
proximity to development (3 inches from a pier piling); third -party damage is projected to be the most
significant threat to the existing ICW Crossing. Third -party damage could occur from the following actions:
1. Installation of pier pilings
2. Anchoring of boats, barges, etc.
3. Installation of other utilities
4. Dredging of the navigational channel
a Inspection Guidelines for Wastewater Force Mains, Water Environment Research Foundation, Co -published by IWA
Publishing, Jason Consultants, LLC, 2010.

Technical Memorandum
Page 14
NEII ICW Crossing Assessment
The Town appears to be in somewhat of a vulnerable position due to the existing horizontal and vertical
alignments. The potential for third -party damage and the inability to control what is done in proximity to
the force main create risk that the Town has minimal, if any, control over.
3.3 Condition of the ICW Crossing
Based on limited observation of the crossing, it does not appear to be damaged or leaking; however, that
provides little information of the actual condition of the pipe. Minimal information was obtained related to
the condition of the existing ICW Crossing in Phase 1 because of the pipe material. Had the pipe been
ductile iron, we could have evaluated the pipe wall thickness to determine if there was measurable internal
or external corrosion. Because the pipe is HDPE, internal assessment tools are required to further evaluate
the condition.

Technical Memorandum
Page 15
NEII ICW Crossing Assessment
Section 4 - Further Condition Assessment
4.1 Further Condition Assessment
Condition assessment of the ICW Crossing to date indicates that there are no apparent significant failures
of the force main, such as large hole or separated joint. This does not eliminate the potential for smaller
failures such as a small hole or minor separation at ajoint that could lead to a significant failure. Due to the
nature of the physical properties of HDPE, a small puncture or gouge of the pipe wall will not normally
fracture or split the pipe, resulting in a catastrophic failure as it would in PVC pipe. Therefore, to assess the
presence of minor defects in the force main, further condition assessment is necessary.
4.2 Risk Assessment
At this juncture, the Town should assess the risk associated with the existing ICW Crossing. Risk is defined
as the product of the consequence of failure and likelihood of failure. The higher the consequence of failure
or the likelihood of failure, the riskier the situation.
Based on the information presented in this assessment and the Town's knowledge of their system, the Town
must determine if the level of risk is appropriate and in accordance with the standard of care, or level of
risk, accepted by similar municipalities in similar situations. The Town must then determine if further
condition assessment is warranted, if installation of a redundant force main is appropriate, or if no further
action is necessary.
4.3 Available Work Periods
The NEII Force Main is the only pipeline available to convey wastewater from the island to the mainland.
It must stay operable to prevent wastewater from backing -up into the collection system, resulting in sanitary
sewer overflows (SSOs). Therefore, work hours must be established during periods of the day or night when
the flow is minimal and the pumping system can be shut down temporarily. The Town indicates that the
following periods are available for shut -down of the pumping system.
Table 4.1 — NEII ICW Crossina Available Shut -down Periods
December - February 10:00 am — 2:00 pm 11:00 pm — 4:00 am
-----------------
March - April 10:00 am —12:30 pm 12:00 am — 4:00 am
April- September None None
October - November 10:00 am-12:30'pm 12:00 am — 4:00 am'
Contractors must be notified of these periods so they can plan and schedule their work accordingly. The
work will likely require multiple shutdowns to complete.

Technical Memorandum
Page 15
NEII ICW Crossing Assessment
Section 4 - Further Condition Assessment
4.1 Further Condition Assessment
Condition assessment of the ICW Crossing to date indicates that there are no apparent significant failures
of the force main, such as large hole or separated joint. This does not eliminate the potential for smaller
failures such as a small hole or minor separation at a joint that could lead to a significant failure. Due to the
nature of the physical properties of HDPE, a small puncture or gouge of the pipe wall will not normally
fracture or split the pipe, resulting in a catastrophic failure as it would in PVC pipe. Therefore, to assess the
presence of minor defects in the force main, further condition assessment is necessary.
4.2 Risk Assessment
At this juncture, the Town should assess the risk associated with the existing ICW Crossing. Risk is defined
as the product of the consequence of failure and likelihood of failure. The higher the consequence of failure
or the likelihood of failure, the riskier the situation.
Based on the information presented in this assessment and the Town's knowledge of their system, the Town
must determine if the level of risk is appropriate and in accordance with the standard of care, or level of
risk, accepted by similar municipalities in similar situations. The Town must then determine if further
condition assessment is warranted, if installation of a redundant force main is appropriate, or if no further
action is necessary.
4.3 Available Work Periods
The NEII Force Main is the only pipeline available to convey wastewater from the island to the mainland.
It must stay operable to prevent wastewater from backing -up into the collection system, resulting in sanitary
sewer overflows (SSOs). Therefore, work hours must be established during periods of the day or night when
the flow is minimal and the pumping system can be shut down temporarily. The Town indicates that the
following periods are available -for shut -down of the pumping system.
Table 4.1 — NE11 ICW Crossing Available Shut -down Periods
December February 10 00 am -mm 00 pm 11,0Qpm 4i00 am;,
March Apnl; r 10 00 am 12 30 pm, t 12 00 ani 4 00 am
April. -September- None None
Contractors must be notified of these periods so they can plan and schedule their work accordingly. The
work will likely require multiple shutdowns to complete.

Technical Memorandum
Page 16
NEII ICW Crossing Assessment
4.4 Condition Assessment Alternatives
There are a variety of condition assessment methods for evaluating pipelines. However, most methods focus
on only one or two aspects of assessment such as wall thickness, air pockets, or leaks. Therefore, multiple
methods are typically necessary to provide a more thorough picture of the condition of a pipeline. The
methods discussed below are the more appropriate to assess the condition of the NEI I ICW Crossing.
4.4.1 Prepatory Work
4.4.1.1 Force Main Cleaning (Pigging)
Some In -Line Inspection (ILI) tools require that force mains be cleaned prior to inspection. This can be
accomplished by pigging or jetting. Both require access to the inside of the force main at each end of the
operation. Preferably this is through an air release valve (ARV) where a tee can be removed. If there are
not enough suitable locations, sections of the pipe must be removed at strategic locations and then replaced
or reinstalled.
Because jetting can only clean about 1,000 feet in each direction, and pigging can clean 5,000 to 10,000
feet (depending on the conditions), there is significantly more cost for pipe access for jetting. However,
pigging requires launching and receiving piping not required for jetting.
4.4.1.1.1 Application for the ICW Crossing Assessment
The NEII force main has been in operation for 34 years. Unless there have been problems with blockage
in the past, it is unlikely that the force main has been cleaned and there is likely sludge build-up in the force
main. The most likely place to find sludge is the bottom of the ICW Crossing. An indication that sludge is
building up in a force main is a decrease in pumping capacity, with the pump still operating on its curve.
The Town should check a few operating points and see where they fall in relation to the curve.
The largest pump at WB PS 41 has a capacity of 2,000 gallons per minute (GPM). At that pumping rate,
the velocity in the 14inch force main is 4.1 feet per second (FPS), which is enough to scour the pipe. The
pump that operates the most has a capacity of 1,000 GPM. 1,000 GPM provides a flow rate of 2 FPS, which
may not be enough to re -suspend the solids. If this pump operates infrequently during low flow periods,
sludge can build up in the force main at the ICW Crossing. It is also likely that solids or sludge builds up
in the 3,600 LF of force main downstream of the crossing, slides downhill back toward the crossing, and
then settles. The pipe elevation changes from -19 at the bottom of the crossing to elevation 22 at the high
point, thereby rising about 41 feet.
The approximate differential pressure for poly pigging a 14-inch pipe is 10-40 PSIG. The approximate flow
rate should be 1,400 - 2,500 GPM, which corresponds to 3 - 5 feet per second (FPS). Running the existing
2,000 GPM pump should provide adequate flow for pigging.
4.4.1.1.2 Preparatory Requirements
Perform the following preparatory work for pigging the force main:
1. Clean, service, and ensure operability of the air release valves.
2. Allow wastewater to back-up in the system (without discharging) at WB PS 41. Run the 2,000
GPM pump at WB PS #1 to scour the force main as much as possible. Observe the discharge.

Technical Memorandum
Page 17
NED ICW Crossing Assessment
3. Locate and operate all in -line and lateral valves to be used during pigging operation. Confirm
whether valves are plug valves or gate vales.
4. Solicit proposals, or select a competent company to pig the force main.
5. Identify locations for insertion and extraction of the pig.
6. Meet with the contractor on site to verify and inspect insertion/extraction points and review flow
control required to maintain minimum/maximum flows.
7. Provide fitting modification, excavation, tapping, shoring and other activities necessary to access
valves, appurtenances, and the pipeline identified as being critical to the performance of the
inspection, if required.
8. Some contractors will require CCTV of a portion of the force main to be pigged so they can
evaluate the existing conditions.
9. Reclean, service, and ensure operability of the air release valves.
10. Allow wastewater to back-up in the system (without discharging) at WB PS #1. Run the 2,000
GPM pump at WB PS #1 to scour the force main as much as possible.
4.4.1.1.3 Pigging Process
1. Arrange valving to isolate the section offorce main to be cleaned.
2. Open operational valve to determine residual pressure and flow rate.
3. Launch aline size swab to prove integrity of pipeline and actual size of opening.
4. Apply a series of individual pigs in varying diameters and/or densities as required to attain proper
cleanliness of pipeline.
5. Check progress of operation by periodically running line size swabs during cleaning.
6. Flush pipeline and laterals properly after the cleaning operation is completed.
4.4.1.1.4 Cost
The cost for pigging force mains varies significantly based on numerous variables including: condition,
sludge built up, access, ability to use the pump station pumps, length, diameter, water cost, etc. A rough
cost -for the pigging process is $25 to $35 per foot. These costs do not include site preparation and
engineering costs. Rough contractor costs for the different alternative are provided in Table 4.2. Total costs
are provided in Table 4.3.
Table 4.2 — Force Main Cleaning (Pigging) Costs
HOPE Crossing Only 900 LF $35,000
HDPE Crossing to ARV #4 4,500 LF $150,000
Full Length 17,530 LF $480,000

Technical Memorandum
Page 17
NE11 ICW Crossing Assessment
3. Locate and operate all in -line and lateral valves to be used during pigging operation. Confirm
whether valves are plug valves or gate vales.
4. Solicit proposals, or select a competent company to pig the force main.
5. Identify locations for insertion and extraction of the pig.
6. Meet with the contractor on site to verify and inspect insertion/extraction points and review flow
control required to maintain minimum/maximum flows.
7. Provide fitting modification, excavation, tapping, shoring and other activities necessary to access
valves, appurtenances, and the pipeline identified as being critical to the performance of the
inspection, if required.
8. Some contractors will require CCTV of a portion of the force main to be pigged so they can
evaluate the existing conditions.
9. Reclean, service, and ensure operability of the air release valves.
10. Allow wastewater to back-up in the system (without discharging) at WB PS #1. Run the 2,000
GPM pump at WB PS #1 to scour the force main as much as possible.
4.4.1.1.3 Pigging Process
1. Arrange valving to isolate the section offorce main to be cleaned.
2. Open operational valve to determine residual pressure and flow rate.
3. Launch aline size swab to prove integrity of pipeline and actual size of opening.
4. Apply a series of individual pigs in varying diameters and/or densities as required to attain proper
cleanliness of pipeline.
5. Check progress of operation by periodically running line size swabs during cleaning.
6. .Flush pipeline and laterals properly after the cleaning operation is completed.
4.4.1.1.4 Cost
The cost for pigging force mains varies significantly based on numerous variables including: condition,
sludge built up, access, ability to use the pump station pumps, length, diameter, water cost, etc. A rough
cost•for the pigging process is $25 to $35 per foot. These costs do not include site preparation and
engineering costs. Rough contractor costs for the different alternative are provided in Table 4.2.,Total costs
are provided in Table 4.3.
Table 4.2 — Force Main Cleaning (Pigging) Costs
-HnaF Cmminn r)nly `
h

Technical Memorandum
Page IS
NEII ICW Crossing Assessment
4.4.2 Leak Detection Technology: Smartl3allTM
The SmartBallTM (developed by Pure Technologies Ltd.) is an in -line investigation acoustic technology
used for leak detection and location of air pockets in pressurized mains. The device consists of an aluminum
alloy core placed within a foam shell. The core is 2.5 inches in diameter and houses an acoustic sensor,
tracking equipment, circuitry, and batteries.
The SmartBallTM is typically inserted into a force main through a check valve or a fitting with a blind flange.
The ball settles to the bottom of the pipe and rolls along with the wastewater flow. Tracking sensors are
mounted to pipeline appurtenances to track the position of the ball as it rolls through the pipe. While in the
pipe, the device obtains a high -quality recording of the acoustic activity in the pipe and sends out ultrasonic
pulses used to track the location of the ball during the survey. The SmartBallTM is typically captured in an
extraction net at a discharge manhole or the wastewater treatment plant. Pure Technologies uses proprietary
software to analyze the data and provide a report that lists the size and location of leaks and pockets of
trapped air or gas.
The SmartBallTM rate of survey is dependent upon the velocity and flow in the force main. Typically, one
force main is surveyed per day, though multiple short force mains could be surveyed in a single day. The
force main does not have to be cleaned prior to survey. The device can be used on 6-inch diameter force
mains and up. The accuracy is reported to be +/- 6 feet.
4.4.2.1 Application for the ICW Crossing Assessment
The primary application for the SmartBallTM survey for the ICW Crossing assessment is leak detection.
Based on the design profile of the crossing, we do not envision locating pockets of air or gas trapped at high
points, but that is a possibility with this type of installation. Although finding no leaks with the SmartBallTM
provides assurance that the force main has not failed, it does not provide specific information on the actual
condition of the pipe.
4.4.2.2 Preparatory Requirements
Preparatory requirements for performing the SmartBallTM survey include.the following:
1. Identify locations for insertion and extraction of the SmartBallTM. The insertion point will be Lift
Station I or 5. The extraction location will likely be at the discharge manhole at CFPUA Pump
Station 35.
2. Identify locations for the SmartBallTM Receiver (SBR) installations. The SBRs are 2-inch sensors
that are attached to the force main at intervals of 1,500 to 3,000 feet. ARV vaults are often used
for this purpose because they provide easy access to the pipeline. Unfortunately, there is about
6,000 feet between access points for the portion of the force main that includes the ICW crossing.
An alternative is to use vacuum excavation (subsurface utility exploration or SUE) to connect to
the force main where there is not an accessible structure. At the crossing, an SBR will be placed
on both sides to verify location of the SmartBallTM.
3. Meet with Pure Technologies on site to verify and inspect insertion/extraction points and review
flow control required to maintain minimum/maximum flows.
4. Provide fitting modification, excavation, tapping, shoring and other activities necessary to access
valves, appurtenances, and the pipeline identified as being critical to the performance of the
inspection, if required.

Technical Memorandum
Page 19
NEII ICW Crossing Assessment
4.4.2.3 Cost
The cost for surveying the NEII ICW Crossing with the SmartBaI1TM is projected to be approximately
$76,000. This is based on 5,280 feet of survey, which is the minimum linear footage Pure Technologies
will survey. However, that is enough to survey both the ICW Crossing and the Bradley Creek Crossing.
A cost breakdown is provided in Table 4.3. The proposal from Pure Technologies is provided as Appendix
E.
4.4.2.4 Additional Considerations
A second alternative is to survey the entire force main (17,530 LF). This could identify locations along the
force main where there are leaks or air pockets of hydrogen sulfide gas that are likely resulting in microbial
induced corrosion (MIC) on the interior wall of the pipe. The cost to survey the entire force main is projected
to be approximately $120,000. For a cost increase of 58%, the Town can survey 3.3 times the survey length
of Alternative 1.
The Town should consider evaluating the full length of the NEII force main while the tool is on -site to
locate pockets of air or gas trapped at high points in the force main. Hydrogen sulfide gas (H2S) can collect
at high points, be converted to sulfuric acid, and corrode ductile iron pipe, should the coating be
inappropriate or fail. The location of high points without ARVs is one of the critical issues for a force main
condition assessment. This technology is preferred over the Sahara® leak detection survey because multiple
deployments are not required for the survey. In addition, taps are not required for deployment.
4.4.3 CCTV and Laser Profiling
The CUES Laser Profiler is a stand-alone, snap -on tool for use with a CUES CCTV survey system and
CUES camera. The laser profiler projects a ring of laser light onto the internal pipe surface in the field of
view of the camera while the camera moves through the pipe. An analysis is performed on the ring of light
using the laser profiler software to build a digital pipe profile. Data can be obtained from this profile,
including pipe size, size of connections, water levels, holes, and offset joints. The software provides
automatic analysis of pipe capacity and ovality, a key parameter that significantly impacts the structural
condition of the pipe.
Using the digital profile, the laser profiler creates a fully interactive three-dimensional model of the pipe.
This enables the user to navigate through the selected pipe within its local environment, thereby providing
a new perspective to traditional CCTV inspections. The accuracy of the laser scan is reported to be 0.25
inches. The laser profiler can be used to survey pipes from 8 to 72 inches in diameter. It requires a 36-inch
opening at the access point and can be deployed 1,800 feet in both directions. It can survey between 1,000
and 1,500 feet per day.

Technical Memorandum
. Page 19
NEII ICW Crossing Assessment
4.4.2.3 Cost
The cost for surveying the NEII ICW Crossing with the SmartBallTM is projected to be approximately
$76,000. This is based on 5,280 feet of survey, which is the minimum linear footage Pure Technologies
will survey. However, that is enough to survey both the ICW Crossing and the Bradley Creek Crossing.
A cost breakdown is provided in Table 4.3. The proposal from Pure Technologies is provided as Appendix
E.
4.4.2.4 Additional Considerations
A second alternative is to survey the entire force main (17,530 LF). This could identify locations along the
force main where there are leaks or air pockets of hydrogen sulfide gas that are likely resulting in microbial
induced corrosion (MIC) on the interior wall of the pipe. The cost to survey the entire force main is projected
to be approximately $120,000. For a cost increase of 58%, the Town can survey 3.3 times the survey length
of Alternative 1.
The Town should consider evaluating the full length of the NEII force main while the tool is on -site to
locate pockets of air or gas trapped at high points in the force main. Hydrogen sulfide gas (HzS) can collect
at high points, be converted to sulfuric acid, and corrode ductile iron pipe, should the coating be
inappropriate or fail. The location of high points without ARVs is one of the critical issues for a force main
condition assessment. This technology is preferred over the Sahara® leak detection survey because multiple
deployments are not required for the survey. In addition, taps are not required for deployment.
4.4.3 CCTV and Laser Profiling
The CUES Laser Profiler is a stand-alone, snap -on tool for use with a CUES CCTV survey system and
CUES camera. The laser profiler projects a ring of laser light onto the internal pipe surface in the field of
view of the camera while the camera moves through the pipe. An analysis is performed on the ring of light
using the laser profiler software to build a digital pipe profile. Data can be obtained from this profile,
including pipe size, size of connections, water levels, holes, and offset joints. The software provides.
automatic analysis of pipe capacity and ovality, a key parameter that significantly impacts the structural
condition of the pipe.
Using the digital profile, the laser profiler creates a fully interactive three-dimensional model of the pipe.
This enables the user to navigate through the selected pipe within its local environment, thereby providing
a new perspective to traditional CCTV inspections. The accuracy of the laser scan is reported to be 0.25
inches. The laser profiler can be used to survey pipes from 8 to 72 inches in diameter. It requires a 36-inch
opening at the access point and can be deployed 1,800 feet in both directions. It can survey between 1,000
and 1,500 feet per day.

Technical Memorandum
Page 20
NEII ICW Crossing Assessment
ition
There are two primary advantages of the CCTV and laser profiler for condition assessment of force mains.
The first is the ability to survey more lengthy runs of pipe than standard CCTV equipment with fewer access
points, if cleaning is not necessary or can be accomplished with an in -line pig. If cleaning is necessary, the
length that can be surveyed from an access point is governed by the length that can be cleaned from that
access point, which is approximately 1,000 feet. The second advantage is the ability to obtain an array of
information from multiple technologies in one survey, including a profile of the pipe.
The primary disadvantages of the laser profiler for condition assessment of force mains include the need to
access a pipeline which has few, if any, access points, and the need to take the pipeline out of service for
the survey. Force mains that cannot be taken out of service for an extended period, must be surveyed during
shutdowns over periods of low flow. Laser inspections can only be performed above the water line and the
pipeline must be less than 50% full.
4.4.3A Application for the ICW Crossing Assessment
CCTV with laser profiling will provide internal inspection of the force main and an assessment of the
ovality of the pipe. Ovality is the degree of deviation from perfect circularity of the cross section of the
pipe. Ovality is a critical parameter when evaluating the strength or capacity of a pipe. As a pipe deflects
(becomes more oval), it decreases in strength and capacity.
Alternatively, the crossing could be cleaned and televised for internal inspection of the pipe only and the
ovality approximated.
4.4.3.2 Preparatory Requirements
Preparatory requirements for performing the CCTV and laser profiling, include the following:
1. Identify locations for access points on each end of the crossing for insertion of cleaning, CCTV,
and laser profiling equipment. The access points must be on the crossing side of the plug valves
because the equipment will not be able to pass through the plug valves due to the size and shape
of the port.
2. Meet with the contractor on -site to inspect and verify acceptability of the access points and the
process to drain the force main.

Technical Memorandum
Page 21
NEII ICW Crossing Assessment
3. Install a tapping sleeve and valve in the vertical position to allow connection of a pipe and pump
to drain the force main.
4. Remove a 5- to 6-foot section of the force main on each end of the crossing and replace with a
section of pipe and two long body solid sleeves that can be easily removed for access to the pipe.
This will provide quick access to the force main which will be critical to optimizing the window
of time for productive work during a shut -down.
5. Pig the force main to clean. Pigging will minimize the preparation work for CCTV and laser
profiling and reduce the contractor's effort and cost.
6. Provide fitting modification, excavation, tapping, shoring and other activities necessary to access
valves, appurtenances, and the pipeline identified as being critical to the performance of the
inspection, if required.
4.4.3.3 Cost
The cost for cleaning, CCTV, and laser profiling of the NEII ICW Crossing is projected to be approximately
$68,500. A cost breakdown is provided in Table 4.3.
4.4.4 Mapping
The CUES Accurate Mapping Probe (AMPTM) is a gyroscopic tool for mapping the XYZ positions of
underground utilities. It also locates defects such as pipe sags, misaligned joints, and any deviation from
horizontal and vertical design. Since the AMPTM is not affected by soil type, adjacent utilities, and
equipment depth limitations, it can be used in areas that are not available to conventional survey. The
AMPTM can be used on pipes made of steel, concrete, HDPE, or PVC.
The AMPTM tool may be pulled either by hand or mechanical winch. In certain cases, the tool may be
pumped through the force main. Exchangeable centralizing wheel units gives the CUES AMPTM an
operational range of diameters from 3.5 to 58 inches.
CUES AMPTM operation is enabled after insertion into the end of the force main. Once physical location
measurements are made, the AMPTM is pulled through the line at a predetermined rate, usually 1 to 5 ft/sec.
After the AMPTM arrives at the other end of the pipeline, it is pulled back obtaining a second set of data.
The captured data is immediately checked on -site to ensure data collection and quality control have been
met. The operator may make multiple passes with tool provide more accurate data.
The data can be uploaded to the office via AMPVUETM and/or AMPVUE PROTM. The output data can be
exported to open platform formats for seamless integration in common GIS platforms/reports. AMPVUETM,
a cloud based free service for all users of CUES AMPTM is available to manage all the data produced by
the CUES AMPTM. This tool provides industry standard enterprise GIS outputs, multiple CAD formats and
standard detailed reports. When used with the CUES free cloud -based AMPVUETM software, one can
perform mapping projects anywhere in the world and have their data processed and delivered within the
same day.
4.4.4.1 Application for the ICW Crossing Assessment
In areas where the water was deep and force main was several feet below grade, CUES AMPTM may provide
a more accurate location of the crossing than manual methods.

Technical Memorandum
Page 21
NEII ICW Crossing Assessment
3. Install a tapping sleeve and valve in the vertical position to allow connection of a pipe and pump
to,drain the force main.
4. Remove a 5- to 6-foot section of the force main on each end of the crossing and replace with a
section of pipe and two long body solid sleeves that can` be easily removed for access to the pipe.
This will provide quick access to the force main which will be critical to optimizing the window
of time for productive work during a shut -down.
5. Pig the force main to,clean. Pigging will minimize the preparation work for CCTV. and laser
profiling and reduce the contractor's effort and cost.
6. " Provide fitting modifrcation,.excavation, tapping, shoring and other activities"necessary, to access
valves, appurtenances; and the pipeline identified as being critical to the performance of the
';inspection, if required.
4.4.3.3 Cost
The cost for cleaning, CCTV, and laser profiling of the NEII ICW Crossing is projected to be approximately
$68,500. A cost breakdown is provided in Table 4.3.
4.4.4 Mapping
The CUES Accurate Mapping Probe (AMPTM) isa gyroscopic tool for mapping the XYZ positions of
underground utilities. It also locates defects such as pipe sags, misaligned joints, and any deviation from
horizontal and vertical design. Since the AMPTM is not affected by soil type, adjacent utilities, and
equipment depth limitations, it can be used in areas that are not available to conventional survey. The
AMPTM can be used on pipes made of steel, concrete, HDPE, or PVC.
The AMPTM tool may be pulled either by hand or mechanical winch. In certain cases, the tool may be
pumped through the force main. Exchangeable centralizing wheel units gives the CUES AMPTM an
operational range of diameters from 3.5 to 58 inches.
CUES AMPTM operation is enabled after insertion into the end of the force main. Once physical location
measurements are made, the AMPTM is pulled through the line at a predetermined rate, usually 1 to 5 ft/sec.
After the AMPTM arrives at the other end of the pipeline, it is pulled back obtaining a second set of data.
The captured data is immediately checked on -site to ensure data collection and quality control have been
met. The operator may make multiple passes with tool provide more accurate data.
The data can be uploaded to the office via AMPVUETM and/or AMPVUE PROTM. The output data can be
exported to open platform formats for seamless integration in common GIS platforms/reports. AMPVUETM,
a cloud based free service for all users of CUES AMPTM is available to manage all the data produced by
the CUES AMPTM. This tool provides industry standard enterprise GIS outputs, multiple CAD formats and
standard detailed reports. When used with the CUES free cloud -based AMPVUETM software, one can
perform mapping projects anywhere in the world and have their data processed and delivered within the
same day.
4.4.4.1 Application for the ICW Crossing Assessment
In areas where the water was deep and force main was several feet below grade, CUES AMPTM may provide
a more accurate location of the crossing than manual methods.

Technical Memorandum
Page 22
NER ICW Crossing Assessment
4.4.4.2 Preparatory Requirements
Preparatory requirements for performing the CUES AMPTM survey are the same as preparing for the CCTV
and laser profiling.
4.4.4.3 Cost
The additional cost for the CUES AMPTM alignment survey, after the crossing has been cleaned and
televised, is projected to be approximately $13,000. This cost assumes a separate system shutdown to
perform the work which includes recleaning. A cost breakdown is provided in Table 4.3. If this tool is used
during the initial shut down, there would be a significant reduction in cost.
4.4.5 Pressure Testing
Rather than looking for a specific defect, pressure testing provides the ability to evaluate the impact of all
defects to the pressure capacity of the pipe. However, pressure testing is not recommended for active
pipelines where there is no redundancy. If a new ICW Crossing is installed, the existing ICW Crossing
should be pressure tested to 1.5-2 times the system operating pressure to confirm it still has sufficient
capacity for the application.
4.4.6 Assess the Condition and Operability of the Plug Valves
The design drawings show a 14-inch plug valve on each side of the ICW Crossing. These valves can be
used to minimizing wastewater discharges into the ICW in the event of a failure of the crossing. If the
crossing can be isolated prior to draining of the force main, up to approximately 65,000 gallons of
wastewater can be held in the force main rather than discharged into the ICW. The valves could also be
used to isolate the crossing and install a bypass.
Valves must be exercised on a regular schedule to maintain operability. Valves that are not operated on a
regular schedule can lock in the open or closed position when operated. Often municipalities do not exercise
valves and then are afraid to use them because they may lock either open or closed. The Town indicates
that with the staff turnover, they do not know if, or when the valves were last exercised and they are afraid
to operate them for fear that they may lock in the closed position.
The Town should consider assessing the condition and operability of the plug valves. The assessment
procedure will be dependent upon the availability of a redundant crossing.
4.4.6.1 No Redundant Crossing
If there is not a redundant crossing to which flow can be diverted, consider the following procedure.
1. Procure and mobilize pipe and fittings to replace the plug valve in case it fails during inspection.
2. Install a vertical tapping sleeve and valve in proximity to the valve. Drain as much of the force
main as possible through this connection.
3. Inspect the valve and evaluate the condition and operability. If the condition and operability are
acceptable, perform maintenance on the valve as recommended by the manufacturer. If the
condition and operability are not acceptable, remove the valve and install the replacement pipe.
Restore flow to the force main.
4. Consult the valve manufacturer to determine if the valve can be refurbished. Refurbish or discard
the valve.

Technical Memorandum
Page 23
NEII ICW Crossing Assessment
5. Dewater the force main and install a new or the refurbished plug valve.
6. Maintain and exercise the valve as recommended by the manufacturer.
4.4.6.2 Redundant Crossing Installed
Divert flow to the new crossing. Evaluate the condition and operability of the existing valve and repair,
refurbish, or replace as appropriate.
4.4.7 Preliminary Condition Assessment Costs
Table 4.3 provides an opinion of probable project costs for each condition assessment alternative.
Table 4.3 — Preliminary Opinion of Probable Project Costs for Condition Assessment Alternatives
Pig HDPE Crossing $35,000 $20,000' $8,000 $63,000 $70
Only (900 LF)
Pig HDPE Crossing to ARV #4 (4,500 LF)$150 000 25 000' $15 000 $190 000 $42
= ..... ..... .......... ........... _......... - _......
SmartBallTM Survey $57,800 $6,700 $11 500 $76,000 $15
of 5,280 LF
SmartBallTM' Survey
of 17,6.30 LF
$97 600
$6,700
$15 700
$120,000
$7
Drain, Clean with Jetter,
$27,500
$20,000'
$8,000 .
$55,500
$62
& CCTV (900 LF)
--
-------------------------
--
-- ---
Add Laser Profiling to
Clean & CCTV (900 LF)
$11,000
$0
$2,000
$13,000
$14
Add X, Y, Z Mapping
Tool (900 LF)
$11,000
$0
$2,000
$13,000
$14
i
* Cost includes installing access points for the assessment equipment

Technical Memorandum
Page 23
NEII ICW Crossing Assessment
5. Dewater the force main and install a new or the refurbished plug valve.
6. Maintain and exercise the valve as recommended by the manufacturer.
4.4.6.2 Redundant Crossing Installed
Divert flow to the new crossing. Evaluate the condition and operability of the existing valve and repair,
refurbish, or replace as appropriate.
4.4.7 Preliminary Condition Assessment Costs
Table 4.3 provides an opinion of probable project costs for each condition assessment alternative.
Table 4.3 — Preliminary Opinion of Probable Project Costs for Condition Assessment Alternatives
a3o,uuuzu;uuu.,� 4its,uuu_-
Hap'n; r;z mappmg>-;
* Cost includes installing access points for the assessment equipment.

Technical Memorandum
Page 24
NER ICW Crossing Assessment
Section 5 - Recommendations
5.1 Consider Installation of a New ICW Crossing
We recommend the Town consider installing a new crossing ofthe ICW via horizontal direction drill (HDD)
for the following reasons:
1. If there is a failure of the existing crossing, depending on the time of year, between 100,000 and
1.8 million gallons per day of untreated wastewater will be pumped into the ICW until the failure
is noticed. Assuming all pump stations are shut down immediately, wastewater would backup and
overflow at pump stations and low manholes in the system. Some of the wastewater will end up
in the waterways and marshes surrounding the island. This will continue until the force main can
be repaired, which could take days depending on the severity of the damage. Failures also tend to
occur when systems are operating close to peak capacity when they can be stressed, such as
holidays and peak vacation times. There is also a greater threat of damage with more vessels in
the waterway. As an example, the City of Wilmington has had at least 3 major discharges of
wastewater during the week of July 41 in the last 20 years or so. A failure would necessitate the
closure of waterways to swimming and shellfish harvesting until the wastewater is flushed from
the waterway and other discharge locations.
2. Critical portions of the force main have minimal cover to protect the pipe. The cover beneath the
navigational channel was recorded to be only 4 to 5 inches. At this depth, the force main is
vulnerable to damage from anchors and other items that could strike the channel bottom.
Dredging could also damage the force main; however, that does not appear to be a threat at the
current time.
3. The proximity of portions of the force main to development (such as piers) increases the potential
for damage to the shallow pipeline. Pier pilings have been driven within 3 inches of the pipe.
Future pilings could strike the pipe, or a hurricane could damage the pier, which in turn could
damage the pipe.
4. A small portion of the existing force main is partially exposed without cover for protection.
5. A new crossing can be connected to the existing crossing with valves that divert wastewater
through either or both crossings. Using both crossings will reduce the internal pressure on both.
6. A HDD can be installed 20 feet or more below the existing channel, placing it out of the way of
the hazards associated with a navigable water body.
5.2 Consider Assessing the Condition of the Bradley Creek Crossing
Immediately prior to discharging to a manhole at CFPUA PS 35, the force main crosses under Bradley
Creek in the same manner it crosses the ICW. The crossing is approximately 1,000 feet long and is labeled
"16-inch Polyethylene Force Main". The design drawings show a depth of cover between approximately 1
and 6 feet. The crossing is depicted on Design Plan Sheet 8, which is included in Appendix C. An aerial
view is provided as Figure 5.1
The Town should assess the risk associated with the existing Bradley Creek (BC) Crossing with the same
approach as the ICW Crossing and consider the consequence of failure and the likelihood of failure. The
consequence of failure would be similar since between 100,000 and 1.8 million gallons per day of untreated
wastewater would be pumped into the ICW until the failure is noticed. However, the risk is mitigated some

Technical Memorandum
Page 25
NEI1 ICW Crossing Assessment
by the fact that the failure might be located much quicker in the shallower water. Additionally, the crossing
under Bradley Creek is much more accessible and most of the flow under the bridge is tidal. If there were
a failure of the crossing, equipment and materials could be mobilized quicker to repair the force main during
the next low tide. A failure would still necessitate the closure of waterways to swimming and shellfish
harvesting until the wastewater was flushed from the waterway and other discharge locations.
The likelihood of failure should be less than the ICW Crossing since there is significantly less boat traffic
and significantly smaller vessels operating in the shallower water. If there is a couple of feet of cover over
the force main, it seems unlikely it would be damaged by boat traffic. However, if the pipe is exposed and
a boat crosses the pipe in shallow water, the motor striking the force main could slash the pipe. and lead to
a spill.
We recommend the Town assess the condition of the Bradley Creek Crossing as follows:
1. If the force main is exposed, inspect it for damage. Clean and televise the crossing to assess the
damage.
2. Probe to locate and mark the Bradley Creek Crossing and evaluate the depth of cover over the
pipe. Have utilities in proximity to the crossing located and marked.
3. Survey the pipe location and elevation, the existing grade along the pipe, the existing utilities and
structures in proximity to the potential work area, and the areas used to access the force main.
Use this data to develop an emergency repair plan for the crossing.
4. Periodically check the depth of cover over the force main.
Figure 5.1 — Aerial View of the Bradley Creek Crossing

Technical Memorandum
Page 25
NEII ICW Crossing Assessment
by the fact that the failure might be located much quicker in the shallower water. Additionally, the crossing
under Bradley Creek is much more accessible and most of the flow under the bridge is tidal. If there were
a failure of the crossing, equipment and materials could be mobilized quicker to repair the force main during
the next low tide. A failure would still necessitate the closure of waterways to swimming and shellfish
harvesting until the wastewater was flushed from the waterway and other discharge locations.
The likelihood of failure should be less than the IC W Crossing since there is significantly less boat traffic
and significantly smaller vessels operating in the shallower water. If there is a couple of feet of cover over
the force main, it seems unlikely it would be damaged by boat traffic. However, if the pipe is exposed and
a boat crosses the pipe in shallow water, the motor striking the force main could slash the pipe and lead to
a spill.
We recommend the Town assess the condition of the Bradley Creek Crossing as follows:
1. If the force main is exposed, inspect it for damage. Clean and televise the crossing to assess the
damage.
2. Probe to locate and mark the Bradley Creek Crossing and evaluate the depth of cover over the
pipe. Have utilities in proximity to the crossing located and marked.
3. Survey the pipe location and elevation, the existing grade along the pipe, the existing utilities and
structures in proximity to the potential work area, and the areas used to access the force main.
Use this data to develop an emergency repair plan for the crossing.
4. Periodically check the depth of cover over the force main.
Figure 5.1 — Aerial View of the Bradley Creek Crossinq

Technical Memorandum
Page 26
NEII ICW Crossing Assessment
5.3 Additional Condition Assessment of the ICW Crossing
If the Town elects to install a new ICW crossing, regardless of the condition of the existing crossing, we
recommend that the Town wait to assess the condition of the existing crossing and valves until the new
crossing is installed for the following reasons:
1. It reduces the risks of problems occurring during the assessment which could delay returning flow
to the crossing, potentially resulting in a discharge. However, if properly managed, that risk
should be minimal.
2. The existing crossing can be taken out of service, significantly reducing the cost of the condition
assessment and providing more options for assessment, such as pressure testing.
3. The Town may elect to abandon the existing crossing.
If the Town elects to proceed with further condition assessment, we recommend the Town consider the
following:
1. Assess the condition of the plug valves on each side of the crossing. Repair or replace as
necessary. Install a section of pipe with two long body solid sleeves for easy removal for future
access for inspection.
2. Prepare for cleaning, CCTV, and laser profiling per Section 4.4.3.2.
3. Clean, CCTV, and perform laser profiling. Analyze the data.
4. Repair or replace the crossing as necessary.
5. If the Town has concerns about the remainder of the force main, prepare for a SmartBallTM survey
per Section 4.4.2.2. Perform SmartBallTM survey on the entire force main and analyze the data.
6. Develop a plan to address areas of concern.
7. Prepare a plan for additional condition assessment if warranted.
5.4 ICW Crossing Operation and Maintenance
We recommend the following operation and maintenance procedures in addition to the condition
assessment recommendations.
5.4.1 Consider Installing a Flow Meter Prior to the Discharge at CFPUA Pump
Station No. 35
We recommend the Town install a flow meter at the NEII discharge manhole at CFPUA Pump Station No.
35, along with the proper SCADA equipment for communication. The flow meter will allow the Town to
compare flow pumped versus flow discharged. If those values differ significantly, it will provide the Town
an immediate, early warning of a system failure and discharge.

Technical Memorandum
Page 27
NEI] ICW Crossing Assessment
5.4.2 Operation and Maintenance Plan for Shallow Subaqueous Crossings
We recommend that the Town consider developing an Operation and Maintenance Plan for shallow
subaqueous crossings. As a minimum, this should include the following tasks:
1. Inspect, perform preventive maintenance, and exercise the 14-inch plug valves on each side of the
crossings as recommended by the manufacturer. Document each activity. Record the date and the
actions performed.
2. Maintain valve spare parts.
3. Procure and store 10-20 feet of 16-inch IPS HDPE for emergency repairs.
4. Procure and store 1-2 stainless steel repair coupling(s) for emergency repairs.
5. Procure and store 1-2 electrofusion coupling(s) for emergency repairs.
6. Flush or pig crossings if there is a buildup of sludge/debris.
The Town should consider additional steps that would be prudent.
5.4.3 Develop an Emergency Response Plan for Shallow Subaqueous Crossings
We recommend that the Town consider developing an Emergency Response Plan (ERP) specifically for
failure of their shallow subaqueous crossings.
An ERP is a formal document that identifies potential emergency conditions that result from at a waterway
crossing and specifies preplanned actions to be followed to minimize property damage and loss of life
should those conditions occur. The EAP contains procedures and information to assist the owner in issuing
early warning and notification messages to responsible downstream emergency management authorities. It
also should contain spill dispersal maps to show the emergency management authorities the critical areas
for action in case of an emergency.
There are a variety of formats, but there are nine basic elements of an ERP. This section briefly examines
each element. As a minimum, the ERP should include the following:
1. System Information
System information must be readily available for persons and organizations responding to, and
impacted by the emergency. This basic information should be easily accessible to authorized staff,
emergency responders, repair crews, and the news media. Events that result in emergencies should
be identified with the corresponding risk described (probability of failure vs. consequence of
failure).
2. Notification Flowchart
A. notification flowchart shows who is to be notified, by whom, and in what priority. The
information on the notification flowchart is necessary for the timely notification of persons
responsible for taking emergency actions. Owners should rely on their county or municipal
Emergency Management Director for help completing and updating the flowchart.
The notification flowchart should include individual names and position titles, office and home
telephone numbers, email addresses, alternative contacts, and means of communication, e.g., radio
call numbers. The number of persons to be notified by each responsible individual on the
notification flowchart should be governed by what other responsibilities the person has been

Technical Memorandum
Page 27
NEII ICW Crossing Assessment
,5.4.2 Operation and Maintenance Plan for Shallow Subaqueous Crossings
We recommend that the Town consider developing an Operation and Maintenance Plan for shallow
subaqueous crossings. As a minimum, this should include the following tasks:
I. Inspect, perform preventive maintenance, and exercise the 14-inch plug valves on each side of the
crossings as recommended by the manufacturer. Document each activity. Record the date and the
actions performed.
2. Maintain valve spare parts.
3. Procure and store 10-20 feet of 16-inch IPS HDPE for emergency repairs.
4. Procure and store 1-2 stainless steel repair coupling(s) for emergency repairs.
5. Procure and store 1-2 electrofusion coupling(s) for emergency repairs.
6. Flush or pig crossings if there is a buildup of sludge/debris.
The Town should consider additional steps that would be prudent.
5.4.3 Develop an Emergency Response Plan for Shallow Subaqueous Crossings
We recommend that the Town consider developing an Emergency Response Plan (ERP) specifically for
failure of their shallow subaqueous crossings.
An ERP is a formal document that identifies potential emergency conditions that result from at a waterway
crossing and specifies preplanned actions to be followed to minimize property damage and loss of life
should those conditions occur. The EAP contains procedures and information to assist the owner in issuing
early warning and notification messages to responsible downstream emergency management authorities. It
also should contain spill dispersal maps to show the emergency management authorities the critical areas
for action in case of an emergency.
There are a variety of formats, but there are nine basic elements of an ERP. This section briefly examines
each element. As a minimum, the ERP should include the following:
1. System Information
System information must be readily available for persons and organizations responding to, and
impacted by the emergency. This basic information should be easily accessible to authorized staff,
emergency responders, repair crews, and the news media. Events that result in emergencies should
be identified with the corresponding risk described (probability of failure vs. consequence of
failure).
2. Notification Flowchart
A. notification flowchart shows who is to be notified, by whom, and in what priority. The
information on the notification flowchart is necessary for the timely notification of persons
responsible for taking emergency actions. Owners should rely on their county or municipal
Emergency Management Director for help completing and updating the flowchart.
The notification flowchart should include individual names and position titles, office and home
telephone numbers, email addresses, alternative contacts, and means of communication, e.g., radio
call numbers. The number of persons to be notified by each responsible individual on the
notification flowchart should be governed by what other responsibilities the person has been

Technical Memorandum
Page 28
NEII ICW Crossing Assessment
assigned. It is usually recommended that any one individual not be responsible for contacting more
than three or four other parties. A spokesperson and alternate should be designated for contacting
regulatory agencies and delivering messages to the news media and the public.
EAPs also should include a list of residents and businesses that should be notified. Compiling this
list will require coordination with Emergency Management Directors and the county assessor's'
office to identify owners of parcels within the spill zone who need to be notified.
3. Emergency Detection, Evaluation, and Classification
Early detection and evaluation of events that trigger an emergency action are crucial. The
establishment of procedures for reliable and timely classification of an emergency is imperative to
ensure that the appropriate course of action is taken based on the urgency of the situation (Is there
a small hole in the crossing pipe or has the pipe been completely severed?)
4. Response Actions for Specific Events and Responsible Parties
In any event, there are a series of general response actions to take, including the following:
1. Analyze the type and severity of the emergency. (Step 3)
2. Take immediate actions to save lives.
3. Act to reduce injuries and system damage.
4. Act to protect the environment. This may include:
a. Identify pump stations to be shut down and the order if any.
b. Identify points of discharge with the least impact and operate equipment that result in
overflows at those locations.
c. Potentially shut down the water system?
5. Make repairs based on priority demand.
6. Return the system to normal operation.
A determination of responsibility for EAP-related tasks must be made during the development of
the plan. Owners are responsible for developing, maintaining, and implementing the EAP. State
and local emergency management officials are responsible for warning and evacuation within
affected areas. The EAP must clearly specify the Owner's responsibilities to ensure effective,
timely action is taken should an emergency occur.
5. Preparedness
Preparedness actions are taken to moderate or alleviate the effects of a failure and to facilitate
response to emergencies. This section identifies actions to be taken before an emergency.
6. Spill Dispersal Maps
Spill dispersal maps should delineate the areas that are affected because of a force main failure.
Spill dispersal maps are used by the Owner and emergency management officials to facilitate timely
notification and evacuation of areas affected by a force main failure. These maps greatly facilitate
notification by graphically displaying impacted areas and showing travel times.

Technical Memorandum
Page 29
NEII ICW Crossing Assessment
7. Appendices
The appendices contain information that supports and supplements the material used in the
development and maintenance of the EAP. The Appendices focus on important issues such as those
that specifically address maintenance requirements for the EAP and failure investigations and
analyses. This information may be directly applicable to the actions of the owner and possibly some
of the emergency management parties, but may not be critical to the actions and activities of other
parties during an actual emergency.
S. Plan Approval
Plans should be officially in effect when reviewed, approved, and signed by the appropriate Town
5.5 Confirm the Crossing of Banks Channel is not Subaqueous
Design Plan Sheet 2 shows the subaqueous crossing of Banks Channel like the IC W and BC Crossings. The
Town has indicated that the crossing was installed on the bridge and is not subaqueous. We recommend the
Town confirm the crossing is not subaqueous and evaluate the potential for high points that may not have
ARVs where gas can collect and corrode the pipe.
5.6 Consider Installation of a Redundant Water Main Crossing
The Town has indicated that there has been discussion related to installation of a redundant water main
crossing of the ICW. If this is a consideration, we recommend the Town consider installing it via horizontal
direction drill (HDD) at the same time as the redundant force main crossing for the following reasons:
1. The Town can recognize design and construction cost savings from economy of scale pricing.
2. The force main and water main can be designed concurrently so that best location of both can be
considered now, so that the force main alignment does not impact the cost of the water main other
in the future.
In lieu of installing the water main now, the Town could design the water main and acquire permits and
easements to secure the alignment now. prior to additional development that may eliminate cost-effective
alignments.

Technical Memorandum
Page 29
NEI] ICWCrossingAssessment
7. Appendices
The appendices contain information that supports and supplements the material used in the
development and maintenance of the EAR The Appendices focus on important issues such as those
that specifically address maintenance requirements for the EAP and failure investigations and
analyses. This information may be directly applicable to the actions of the owner and possibly some
of the emergency management parties, but may not be critical to the actions and activities of other
parties during an actual emergency.
8. Plan Approval
Plans should be officially in effect when reviewed, approved, and signed by the appropriate Town
5.5 Confirm the Crossing of Banks Channel is not Subaqueous
Design Plan Sheet 2 shows the subaqueous crossing of Banks Channel like the ICW and BC Crossings. The
Town has indicated that the crossing was installed on the bridge and is not subaqueous. We recommend the
Town confirm the crossing is not subaqueous and evaluate the potential for high points that may not have
ARVs where gas can collect and corrode the pipe.
5.6 Consider Installation of a Redundant Water Main Crossing
The Town has indicated that there has been discussion related to installation of a redundant water main
crossing of the ICW. If this is a consideration, we recommend the Town consider installing it via horizontal
direction drill (HDD) at the same time as the redundant force main crossing for the following reasons:
1. The Town can recognize design and construction cost savings from economy of scale pricing.
2. The force main and water main can be designed concurrently so that best location of both can be
considered now, so that the force main alignment does not impact the cost of the water main other
in the future.
In lieu of installing the water main now, the Town could design the water main and acquire permits and
easements to secure the alignment now. prior to additional development that may eliminate cost-effective
alignments.

Technical Memorandum
Page 30
NEII ICW Crossing Assessment
Section 6 - Summary of Recommendations
A summary of the recommendations of this assessment are summarized below
6.1 New Intracoastal Waterway Crossing
Consider installing a new crossing of the ICW via horizontal direction drill (HDD) to get 20 feet below
the navigational channel, rather than 4- to 5-inches, and several feet below existing and potential pier
pilings.
6.2 Bradley Creek Crossing
Perform a preliminary assessment of the Bradley Creek Crossing that includes locating and surveying the
pipe horizontal and vertical location along with the existing grade to establish and evaluate baseline
conditions. Develop an emergency repair plan and monitor the cover over the pipe.
6.3 Existing Intracoastal Waterway Crossing
If the Town elects to install a new ICW Crossing, the Town should wait to assess the condition of the
existing crossing and valves until the new crossing is installed.
1. Assess the condition of the plug valves on each side of the crossing as indicated in Section 4.4.5.
Repair or replace as necessary. Install a section of pipe with two long body solid sleeves for easy
removal for future assessment of the interior of the fore main.
2. Prepare for cleaning, CCTV, and laser profiling per Section 4.4.3.2.
3. Pig the force main if pumping conditions indicate sludge buildup in the force main.
4. Clean, CCTV, perform laser profiling and mapping. Analyze the data and evaluate the cost
effectiveness of repairing the ICW Crossing.
5. Prepare a plan for additional condition assessment if warranted.
6. If a second ICW crossing is installed, pressure test the existing ICW crossing at 1.5-2 times the
system operating pressure.
6.4 Operation and Maintenance
Modify the Town's current operation and maintenance program to include the following:
1. Install a flow meter at the NEII discharge manhole at CFPUA PS #35, along with the proper
SCADA equipment for communication, for comparison to the flow meter at WB PS #1.
2. Develop an Operation and Maintenance Plan for shallow subaqueous crossings.
3. Develop an Emergency Response Plan specifically for failure of subaqueous crossings.
6.5 Banks Channel Crossing
Confirm the crossing of Banks Channel is attached to the bridge and is not subaqueous as indicated in the
construction drawings. Evaluate the potential for high points that may not have ARVs where gas can collect
and corrode the pipe.

Technical Memorandum
Page 31
NE11 ICW Crossing Assessment
6.6 Redunant Water Main Crossing
If a new ICW Crossing (wastewater) is installed, consider designing and installing a redundant water main
crossing via horizontal direction drill (HDD) at the same time to take advantage of efficiencies in design
and construction.

Technical Memorandum
Page 31
NEI1 ICW Crossing Assessment
6.6 Redunant Water Main Crossing.
If a new ICW Crossing (wastewater) is installed, consider designing and installing a redundant water main
crossing via horizontal direction drill (HDD) at the same time to take advantage of efficiencies in design
and construction.

Technical Memorandum
Page 32
NEI] ICW Crossing Assessment
Section 7 - APPENDICIES
Appendix A: NEI Segment 1 Assessment Preliminary Engineering Report
Figure 4.2 —NEI Segment 1 Rehabilitation and Replacement
Appendix B: "Sanitary Sewer Improvements, Pumping Station & Force Main, Town of Wrightsville
Beach North Carolina", Henry Von Oesen & Associates Consulting Engineers & Planners,
Wilmington, North Carolina, Sheets 5, 9, and 8, 1977.
Appendix C: USACE Hydrographic Survey Section 4 / Tangents 4-5
Appendix D: Periodic Pressure Surge Graphs at WB PS #1
Appendix E: SmartBallTM Survey, Detailed Opinion of Probable Project Cost

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX A

No
MINES
NN
-mm-oll
■■■■■■■I■■■■�'INN
loomm
ON
s�I...■.■...DEL
.
■■■■■■■n
■..
..■■.......�
11on
■■
�■nisi■■i�■■■■■■■■�r��■■■■■■■.■■■■■■■■
A.��■■■I.��®■
■■li■■■■■.u■■■■■■■
0■011.■A
S!
\Iqor
Moll
O1
MEMO
�®■
.■■■.
■■■■■■■■■■.■11■I.■�
No
OFAME
EM-
MEN
swill
milloommoom
111
■■05■■
MEIN
milmoommom
■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■Lo—s■■■■■■■■■■o■■■■■■■N

APPENDIX B

�w. °r •s�.4 -.
Er .�OP2� • P
:u t9'Ti 4� Y+iOlp

Z4*-
4RIT
. . . . . . . . . . . .

S f 7 Y
of 13
/-OLEANDER—DR.`- —U.S. 76-
1
e� a NO 1.! l�1 1 -11 �1 IlLif fY ~�+IFS— t f r� �L i tT't ,!
f i T };
1 #7�{ii�lfl_�Jirl 1
�T f.YLe rl F. lrr T. - tr�•
`-^+� ak 1 _. ...............................
.._
.. e }� s: i� �� � i I } 3. `� € _.`_•_�' ems: �" ��
f
y X. 'b?i>141 =-7,42,vi
� 4 ?'� q,►i_ � % \Cra-,w� «.-> - .'f� Ate!
y : ♦ OLEANOEF OF. U S. T6 F r•�..j_. ...... -
.�.... ^+�•'"� _MILITAFT
r
AeY''!` f ���� �'t -i � ♦a / N DTI,$}, � ,'o - �'h ,
y �
✓ -
• I / '� ;\� F,f 1 � I I S` ,, w RAPY EWER VnPR�TJ '..
1
• y �_ 4 - I� '� :..`. ... .. .. ... WRCHTSv1 E

-b
Lt'r ; �StNei. a ft4
o '
PM
x. id

F.1upi-411TOW"

APPENDIX C

APPENDIX D

f' uririm��xn 1"�maw�'iln t'�inFrmauff�rv�.mwitmf�w os
r_14v�GfI V.ms➢1l.RGwfxpmwmumm'EVKsse-KceeµYwrN[IFA%
;...;
USArety Corps
of Engineers.
W mg n Di�
£GE D
NulgN .n AN
M,i WFM
t Gan
=a oig 5be0oaer
O
S.tiw
8
�-4
�1-6
.t.,c�e<n uen�e e�y®e-r
t-neel§mwem
=2,10
t J>nrfbn MmYu
M14-12
H
1 GIBv11 L1pM
1]9-U
M1b�
GQ 4343. T
�,PaEl19M
W yYM�Na
O§
0 Gi Dpybo m
•.. W.y{mmll
i
=
�1led My_
1�NaeDellm Cfmngl
O
C DaigarGlpn
m{i�tm.
V
ia' W
W
o'lld.GaGppa
:ol

From: Mike Vukelich Imailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 9:01 AM
To: Ford, Chris <[e-mail]>
Cc: 'Steve Dellies' <[e-mail]>; Steven Carter<[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: Wrightsville Beach LS #1 Pressures
Chris,
Attached is a more recent graph ofNEI-I pressures. The system stabilized at normal pressures
for a few weeks but now as can be seen in the second graph, pressures randomly increased in
some type of pattern? (cannot identify the cause).
LS-5 is pumping into the NEI and we are not experiencing the reduced flows of the first graph?
As mentioned we did contact CFPUA and met at their LS-57 and operated and aligned the
crossover valves between the authority 10" and the Town's 14", they appeared to be separated
completely.
Any thoughts,
Mike
From: Mike Vukelich [mailto:mvukelichgbtowb.oro]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 4:23 PM
To: '[e-mail]'
Cc: 'Steve Dellies'; 'Eugene Savarino'
Subject: Wrightsville Beach LS #1 Pressures
Chris,
Attached are the pressure graphs I mentioned during our discussion this afternoon. As you can
see the pressures increase for no apparent reason and have in the past been high for extended
periods of time. We don't understand the reason for the spikes — maybe the you or the authority
can shed some light on it? If needed what would be the best method for scouring the pipeline;
maybe pig it as a last resort, 17,000+ feet concerns me.
Thanks for your help,
Mike

From: Mike Vukelich [mailto:mvukelich(@towb.oro]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 11:40 AM
To:'[e-mail]'
Cc: 'Steve Dellies'
Subject: NEI #1 - Pressure Problems
Chris,
When you get a chance, please call me or Steve Dellies to discuss a problem we are experiencing
with our segment of the NEI. We are encountering high pressure — 36 psi and the flow decrease
from LS5 to about 50 gpm which cannot keep up. We checked the valves at CPFUA LS 57 and
when we pump into their line all appears to be normal. When switched back to our line at that
location pressures increase. The pressure increases occur several times per day and are not
continuous.
If you recall I mentioned to you're the last time we spoke that we had replaced our arv's due to
solids filling them and venting too many solids. I am hoping there may be something we are
missing that you may be able to assist us with — really don't want to pig the line. Whatever is
occurring appears to be downstream of LS57 ???
Michael "Mike" F. Vukelich
Public Works Director
Town of Wrightsville Beach, NC
mvukelichntowb.org
910-256-7935 Fax [phone]
www.townofwri2htsvillebeach.com
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public
Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by an authorized state official.

From: Mike Vukelich [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 11:40 AM
To: 'Chris. [e-mail]'
Cc: 'Steve Dellies'
Subject: NEI #1 - Pressure Problems
Chris,
When you get a chance, please call me or Steve Dellies to discuss a'problem we are experiencing
with our segment of the NEI. We are encountering high pressure — 36 psi and the flow decrease
from LS5 to about 50 gpm which cannot keep up. We checked the valves at CPFUA LS 57 and
when we pump into their line all appears to be normal. When switched back to our line at that
location pressures increase. The pressure increases occur several times per day and are not
continuous. '
If you recall I mentioned to you're the last time we spoke that we had replaced our arv's due to
solids filling them and venting too many solids. I am hoping there may be something we are
missing that you may be able to assist us with — really don't want to pig the line. Whatever is
occurring appears to be downstream of LS57 ???
Michael "Mike" F. Vukelich
Public Works Director
Town of Wrightsville Beach, NC
[e-mail]
910-256-7935 Fax [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public
Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by an authorized state official.

C:\Program Files\Proficy.\Pro€icy CIMPLICITY\projects\Telemetry_System\screens\LS1_Pressure_.cim
3:59:45. PM 1/7/-2014

40
36
_
Il
32
:: -----
,I
28
�
I
24"
r -
I
20
i
18'
,
12
4
is
0
'#
- t^ I, -
12/03/2013-. ..... 12110f2013
3:59:32 PM' 3.59:32 PM 3i59.37PM'i 3:502 PM 3:59:32 PM 3.594PW 3:59:32,PM 3:59:32 PM 1
inaljWits sude[.V W SIfI utoupdat
C:\Program Files% Proficy\Prof icy CIMPLICITY\projects\Telemetry_System\screens\LSI_Pressure..cim
4':00.:20'.ON I/7/20l'4

C.,\Ptogkam
P.0 V71901.4

40
1, t
36
32
I
28
24
P
201
16-
I'I
I
12
I
0
4'
i
0
I I
10/2912013 11/0512013
4:59:32 PM 4:59:32 PM 4.66:32'PM 4:59:32 PM 4i59 32 PM 4:59i32.PM, 4:59:32 PM 3:59:32 PM
Une ID Slider.Value jUnits 1611der Value. Slider Value Dals Anay lisAutoupdat4
LSt_PRESSURE 1 36.71 5:07:07.137A11l0512013'" AUTO UPDAI
CC\Program Files\Proficy\Proficy CIMPLICITY-\projects\Telemetry_System\screens.\LS1_Pressure.cim
4.06::52 01-1. 1/7 /2014

C:1Pro ram-Eil�s\Prof3 ProPi C d3PLX C•2TX ro•eots 'Teiemetx• 5 stem screens-\l-lS3 PresBur . i
•�:04:3 AM 2yk2l2039