Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout17-11A Chimento(Lcb— Coastal Management ENVIRONMENTAL OIALITY NOTICE OF VIOLATION June 2,2017 CERTIFIED MAIL 70151520000355154363 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Michelle Chimento 4025 West Soundside Rd. Nags Head, NC 27959 ROY COOPER Gm071M MICHAEL S. REGAN secretary BRAXTON C. DAVIS Director RE: NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND REQUEST TO CEASE UNAUTHORIZED DEVELOPMENT LAMA VIOLATION #17-11A Dear Ms. Chimento: This letter confirms that on May 30, 2017, Cynthia Rountree Field Representative with the Division of Coastal Management was onsite at your property located at 4018 West Soundside Road adjacent to the Roanoke Sound located in or near Nags Head, off US Hwy 158, in Dare County, North Carolina. The purpose of the visit was to investigate unauthorized development including the placement of broken concrete waterward of normal water level (NWL) and in noncoastal wetlands. This letter also confirms our onsite meeting on June the 1, 2017 to discuss restoration. Information gathered by me for the Division of Coastal Management indicates that you have undertaken major development in violation of the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA). No person may undertake Major Development in a designated Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) without first obtaining a permit from the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources. This requirement is imposed by North Carolina General Statute (N.C.G.S.) 11 3A-1 18. have information that indicates you have undertaken or are legally responsible for placing broken concrete within the Roanoke Sound and within noncoastal wetlands within the 30 foot buffer without a permit on the aforementioned property. This activity took place in the Public Trust Area, Estuarine Waters and Estuarine Shoreline that are contiguous with the Roanoke Sound. Public Trust Areas, Estuarine Waters and Estuarine Shoreline areas are designated as Areas of Environmental Concern (AEC). No CAMA permit was issued to you for work in these areas. Based on these findings, I am initiating an enforcement action by issuing this Notice of Violation for violation of the Coastal Area Management Act and the State's Dredge and Fill Law. I request that you immediately CEASE AND DESIST any further unauthorized development and contact me about this matter. A civil assessment of up to $10,000 plus investigative costs may be assessed against any violator. Each day that the development described in this Notice is continued or repeated may constitute a sep`�y subject to an additional assessment of $10,000. An injunction or criminal penalty may also behtd rf}f violation in accordance with N.C.G.S.113A-126. JUN 0 9 2017 DCM- MHD CITY State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Coastal Management Elizabeth City Office 1 401 South Griffin Street, Suite 300 1 Elizabeth City, North Carolina 27909 2522643901 Michelle Chimento June 5, 2017 Page 2 of 2 It is the policy of the Coastal Resources Commission to assess a civil penalty plus investigative costs against all violations. This is done to recoup some of the costs of investigating the violation and/or to compensate the public for any damage to its natural resources. The amount assessed will depend upon several factors, including the nature and area of the resources that were affected and the extent of the damage to them. Based upon the North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 15A, Subchapter 07H. State Guidelines for Areas of Environmental Concern, the activity you have undertaken, placing broken concrete riprap waterward of NWL greater than 6 inches above the adjacent wetland substrate and placing riprap within noncoastal wetlands within the 30 foot buffer and the 75 foot AEC into the sound and within the 30-foot buffer and 75 foot AEC in the Public Trust Areas, Estuarine Waters and Estuarine Shoreline AEC(s), is not consistent with Section 15A NCAC 07J.0201 which states that every person or entity wishing to undertake any development in an AEC shall obtain a permit from the Department. In addition, it appears that the area impacted may include non -coastal wetlands. Therefore, I am requesting that you provide a written determination from the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) regarding the unauthorized placement of fill and complete any restoration that may be required. The enclosed Restoration Plan describes the action necessary to bring this project into compliance with the Act. If you intend to cooperate with my request, please sign one of the attached Restoration Agreements and return it to me in the enclosed, self-addressed envelope within ten (10) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to comply with this request or respond back to this office prior to the requested deadline with an acceptable schedule for compliance will be interpreted as a refusal to cooperate and will result in a Notice of Continuing Violation, as well as a court injunction being sought ordering compliance. The relevant statutes and regulations are available from this office, and I am willing to assist you in complying with the requirements of these laws. A site inspection will be made in the near future to determine whether this REQUEST TO CEASE AND DESIST has been complied with. I request that you contact me immediately. Thank you for your time and cooperation in resolving this important matter. If you have any questions about this or related matters, please call me at (252) 264-3901. Upon completion of the restoration as requested in the Restoration Plan Agreement to the satisfaction of the Division of Coastal Management, you will be notified as to the amount of the civil assessment for undertaking development without first obtaining the proper permit(s) and/or development that is inconsistent with Coastal Resources Commission rules. Sincerely, Cynthia Rountree Field Representative NC Division of Coastal Management Cc: Frank Jennings, District Manager, DCM Roy Brownlow, Compliance Coordinator, DCM Lynn Mathis, Field Specialist, DCM Josh Pelletier, USACE ENCLOSURE Michelle Chjmento June 5, 2017 Page 2 of 2 RESTORATION PLAN For Marc Chimento Property CAMA Violation No. 17-11A Property located at 4018 West Soundside Road, Dare County 1. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) stated in an e-mail correspondence (enclosed) received June 1, 2017 that they require restoration of the jurisdictional wetlands at 4018 West Soundside Road. DCM will require a restoration acceptance letter from the USACE. If you have any further questions regarding these wetlands the USACE contact person is Josh Pelletier (910) 251- 4605. 2. Remove all concrete and Fill that has been placed within noncoastal wetland as identified by the USACE and within the 75 foot AEC totaling approximately 322 square feet. 3. Bring the height of the riprap placed waterward of the wetland toe to 6 inches above the adjacent wetland substrate grade as required by 15 NCAC 07H.2405(f). 4. Mats must be used if using machinery to cross over wetlands in order to remove the rock. I, Michelle Chimento, agree to remove any rock or fill material from the 75 AEC and bring the height of the riprap along the wetland toe to 6 inches above the wetland substrate. I agree to complete this restoration to the satisfaction of the Division of Coastal Management (DCM) by July 1, 2017, or provide an explanation for non-compliance and a reasonable request for time extension. When corrective actions are complete, I will notify the DCM so the work can be inspected. SIGNATURE: DATE: it is the policy of the Coastal Resources Commission to assess a civil penalty plus investigative costs against all violations. The amount assessed will depend upon several factors, including the nature and area of the resources that were affected and the event of the damage to them. If restoration is not undertaken or satisfactorily completed, a substantially highercivilassessment will be levied and an injunction sought to require restoration. RECEIVED JUN 0 0 2017 DCM- M H 0 CITY From: Pelletier, Josh R CIV CESAW CESAD (US) <Josh.R.Pelletier@usace.army.mil> Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 6:10 AM To: Cynthia Rountree Subject: RE: Core wetlands violation Cynthia, Thanks for the pictures. We would require restoration of the jurisdictional wetlands as any material places in these areas would have required authorization from the Army Corps of Engineers. If you need anything else from me let me know and as always I appreciate you guys keeping us in the loop! Thanks again! Josh -----Original Message ----- From: Cynthia Rountree[mailto:cynthia.rountree@ncdenr.gov] Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 9:52 AM To: Pelletier, Josh R CIV CESAW CESAD (US) <Josh.R.Pelletier@usace.army.mil> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Core wetlands violation Josh, Good Morning! I hope all is going well there. I was out yesterday investigating a complaint about rocks being placed in the water and noticed that the wetlands on the property are core wetlands. They have placed rock in the wetlands and have driven an excavator through them. We will take the lead on this violation but I need an e-mail or something officially from you as to weather or not you will want any restoration of these wetlands and how much of the rock you would like removed. I am attaching some pictures from yesterday along with the property information and pictures from before the violation occured. Please let me know how you would like me to proceed with the core wetlands that were affected by the rock placement. If you have any questions please feel free to give me a call or e-mail. Thanks for your assistance with this matter. Sincerely, Cynthia Cynthia Rountree Field Representative Division of Coastal Management NC Department of Environmental Quality ec '- D JUN ®9 2011 252-264-3901, ext. 233 252-331-2951(fax) cynthia.rountree@ncdenr.gov <mailto:cynthia.rountree@ncdenr.gov> 401 South Griffin Street Suite 300 Elizabeth City, NC 27909 Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. JUN ® 9 2017 DCM- MHO CITY (d) This permit shall not be applicable to proposed construction where theDivision of Coastal Management has determined, based on an initial review of the application; that notice and review pursuant to G.S. 113A-119is necessarybecause there are unresolved questions concerning the proposed activity's impact on adjoining properties or on water quality; air quality; coastal wetlands; cultural or historic sites; wildlife; fisheries resources; or public trust rights. (e). This permit-shall.notsliminate the need to -obtain any.other required state, local, or federal authorization. (f) Development carried out under this permit shall be consistent with all local requirements, AEC Guidelines, and local land use plans current at the time of authorization. History Note: Authority G.S. 113A-107,• 113A-118.1; Eff. August 1, 2000; Amended Eff.' February 1, 2009. 15ANCAC 07H.2405 SPECIFIC CONDITIONS (a) This general permit shall only be applicable along shorelines possessing wetlands, which exhibit an identifiable escarpment. (b) The structure shall be constructed of granite, marl, riprap, concrete without exposed rebar, or other suitable equivalent materials approved by the Division of Coastal Management. (c) The height of the erosion escarpment shall not exceed three feet. (d) The riprap shall be placed immediately waterward of the erosion escarpment. (e) The riprap revetment shall be positioned so as not to exceed a maximum of six feet waterward ofthe erosion escarpment at any point along its alignment with a slope no flatter than three feet horizontal per one foot vertical and no steeper than one and one half feet horizontal per one foot vertical. (0 The riprap shall be positioned so as not to exceed a maximum of six inches above the elevation of the adjacent wetland substrate or escarpment. (g) Where the Division of Coastal Management determines that insufficient wetland vegetation exists along the pemrittee's shoreline to provide adequate shoreline stabilization, the permittee shall be required to plant appropriate wetland vegetation landward of the riprap revetment as directed by the Division of Coastal Management. (h) Construction authorized by this general permit will be limited to a maximum length of 500 feet. (i) No bacldrll or any other fill of wetlands, submerged aquatic vegetation, estuarine waters, public trust areas, or highground areas is authorized by this general permit. 0). No excavation of the shallow water bottom, any wetlands, or high ground is authorized by this general permit. (k) Riprap material used for revetment construction shall be free from loose dirt or any pollutant and be of a size sufficient to prevent its movement from the site by wave action or currents. 0) If the crossing of wetlands with mechanized or non -mechanized construction equipment is necessary, temporary construction mats shall be utilized for the area(s) to be crossed. The temporary mats shall be removed immediately upon completion of construction of the riprap structure. (m) The permittee shall maintain the structure in good condition and in conformance with the terms and conditions of this permit or the remaining riprap revetment shall be removed within 90 days of notification from the Division of Coastal Management. History Note: Authority G.S. 113A-107; 113A-118.1; Eff. August 1, 2000; Amended Eff. February 1, 2009. JUN 0 9 2017 DCM-- WD CITY 76 V f, DCM ENFORCEMENT TRACKING REPORT Issuer Field Rep. _l n�'H 'i I� Ci,.niYr' �. ED LPO ❑ Description Violation Case No. I I- I I A Violated Permit N (if applicable) Was activity permiltable? Yes / No Initial Discovery Date W ... 4� 7t:i7 Discovery Method t_Gtgln ol- pdu'a C51I % - Violation Description Ko • V V.,e -1> ikII CA, ISU p ,eed L i 4NI 41 7,:-)' 11 F-C Respondent Information Prior CAMA or D/F Violations: Yes ANo RespondentName(s) Har'c 0Lym,2y4cj (Landowner/Agent/Contractor) 1{�) 2'7R$ Address Daj i.1�2'1 �- SOu n�S• n(t f,iC�e Kc�• City ,-�QOi$ __� State iEl Zip Phone # Soll - q a `1 0 - 5a 3 Fax # U Email Violation Type: Project Type: Authorizations Required: Site Visits RePsppoonndf nt Site Visits RePspponnd nt 91 No Permit ® Private/community [] Major © CAMA 5��v ❑ Permit Condition Govt./Public Minor Q D&F� © ❑ Expired Permit Commercial 0 General ❑ El w/ Rules Tier Level: 1 II III Violation Location and Site Description ` i%' 35 "N ' 75"3-1'53,65" �J Lat/Long • Project Location: County bcLele Street Address/ State Road/ Lot #(s) q01 b Luae l Soui Ssao �d Subdivision — City Items 11 9d ZIP 21 q 5 �1 Phone # ( 86' ) q;to -,1523 River Basin ?aSs& Adj. Wlr. Body ILtic A 1,: &,s ,( r�a 'man /unkn) Q k S „i Shoreline Length 116 / SAV: Not Sure• Yes No Sandbags: Not Sure Yes No PNA: Yes V Adjacent ORW: Yes (: ` Adjacent Crit. Hato. Yes No Photos Yes No Waiver Required Yes No In DWQ Buffer Area Yes No Closest Maj. Wtr. Body o0.YLe r Specify DWQ Buffer if applicable: Restoration Extension Granted Yes No NOV Date CNOV Date Penalty Assessment Sent to Respondent Date Rcvd, by Dist. Mgr, Date Assessment Extended Yes Initial Req. Comp. Date -- Date Comp. Observed App./Permit Fee Penalty Willful/Intent. No Restoration Letter Acceptance Date 7J.0409 Ref. Recomm. Assess. DCM Assess. $ $ $ ® CITY $ Total Formal Assessments, Appeals and Reductions Date Long Form Submitted Date Formal CPA Submitted Final Assessment $ Date Attorney General's Office for Injunction or Formal Collection Assessment Appealed: Yes No ❑ Penalty modified Date sent to AG ❑ Respondent not responsive to penalty/NOV Injunction to complete restoration Date Collection Let. Sent Date Demand Let. Sent Violation Activities and Impacts AECs Affected: �^ Wetlands Impacted Ye No If yes, which types: OCW EA PT ESQ PTS TTBA SA DS CJ SY JR LS TY PWS: FC: - - Ss SC SP IF BF 40 Restoration Required by the Respondent Q;> No Dimensions in excess of permit/ unauthorized activities Dimensions to restore Final dimensions allowed Actually restored Development Activities , rc:.. t Habitat Description 141 4W wF .a oPk Closing Payment Received $ _ Date Date Case Closed 2-W4"4 2m-v- JUN 0 9 2017 DCM-, MHD CITY Ix CITY na zSS �rov� 6cA e Door c-oco �6ced ECOVED .IUN 0 0 Z017 IVED 0 9 2017 13cm- MiVI0 CITY It 4� I t gy NVI 1 i I s• k 1 ' "I dm �n v a J"a ��F'. yrAs .. ter.', o. ;.c. w it •.- y 6 906 Coastal Management ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY August 25, 2017 CERTIFIED MAIL 70151520000355154486 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Michelle Chimento 4025 West Soundside Road Nags Head, NC 27959 RE, CAMA VIOLATION #17-11A Dear Ms. Chimento: ROY COOPER G,n,e,n,.lr MICHAEL REGAN serrnnry' BRAXTON DAVIS Director This letter is in reference to the Notice of Violation dated June 2, 2017 that Cynthia Rountree, representative for the Division of Coastal Management, issued to you for the unauthorized placement of broken concrete within the Roanoke Sound and noncoastal wetlands within the 30-foot buffer at 4018 West Soundside Road in Nags Head, Dare County. The violation involved the Public Trust Area, Estuarine Waters and Estuarine Shoreline, which are Areas of Environmental Concern (AECs) designated by the Coastal Resources Commission. Based upon the site visit conducted on July 25, 2017 by Ms. Rountree, the restoration requested appears to be complete to the satisfaction of the Division of Coastal Management. The Coastal Area Management Act provides that a civil assessment of up to $10,000 plus investigative costs may be assessed for any violation. It is the policy of the Coastal Resources Commission to assess a civil penalty for all violations in order to recover some of the costs of investigating violations and/or to compensate the public for any damage to its natural resources. Under the rules of the Coastal Resources Commission, a proposed civil penalty in the amount of $646.00 is appropriate for this violation. You may expeditiously resolve this matter prior to the assessment of a formal civil penalty by accepting responsibility for the violation and paying the amount proposed above. In order to do this, you must: (1) sign one of the attached copies of an "Agreement to Pay Civil Assessment;' (2) attach a check or money order for $646.00 made payable to the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ); and, (3) return the signed agreement and payment to this office in the enclosed, self-addressed envelope within ten (10) days of your receipt of this letter. Upon deposit of your check in the Department's account, you will receive a Notice of Compliance officially closing this enforcement action. If you do not send a signed agreement and payment to this office within ten (10) days, the Director of the Division of Coastal Management will formally assess a civil penalty against you. You will then have the opportunity to request a hearing on the penalty or request settlement of the penalty. (R�� AUG 31 2017 ,0CW1., wivio C�T� State of Notch Carolina I Enwonneental Quality 1 Coastal Management 401 S. Griffin St., Ste 3001 Elizabeth City, NC 27909 252-264-39011252-331-2951(fax] Michelle Chimento August 25, 2017 Page 2 Thank you for your time and cooperation in resolving this important matter. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (252) 264-3901. Sincerely, ,� Frank Jennin s District Manager, Northeastern District NC Division of Coastal Management FJ/yc Enclosures cc: Roy Brownlow, Compliance Coordinator, DCM, Morehead City Cynthia Rountree, Coastal Management Representative, DCM, Elizabeth City Josh Pelletier, USACOE, Washington AUG 31 2917 ®CM- NIHD CITY CAMA VIOLATION #17.11A Marc Chimento AGREEMENT TO PAY PROPOSED CIVIL ASSESSMENT I understand that the staff of the Department of Environmental Quality will propose the assessment of a civil penalty in the amount of $646.00 against me for violation of the Coastal Area Management Act, NCGS 113A- 100 et se , committed on or near property located at 4018 West Soundside Road in Nags Head, Dare County, North Carolina. In order to resolve this matter with no further action or expense on my part, I accept responsibility for the violation as described in the Notice of Violation letter dated June 2, 2017, and agree to pay the proposed civil assessment of $646.00. DATE SIGNATURE ADDRESS TELEPHONE NUMBER RECEIVED AUG 31 2017 DCM ENFORCEMENT TRACKING REPORT � Field Rep. � . }� .i , puy ¢yp Issuer ® Violation Case No. I - j LPO Violated Permit No. LPd (if applicable) Violation Description Was activity permutable. Yes, No Initial Discovery Date " p, ;2Ci7 Discovery Method (.'f; 'z° 0 lu dM t4.r 3ti•E Lz. Ft't J Violation Description QO C Oat cd, it Kcc,nrV 5 77,77, Respondent information Prior CAMA or D/F Violations: Yes ti�o (Landowner/AgenUContractor) RespondentName(s) �1LtrC GlAlwtetn r` ((1� I - a`I�5�1 SCun��5�CR2 Rd. City �) , � 'SrLV _ State NC Zip Address ��a� Lli2"i- �`� _,___._.. Phone # SOLI — o A U " Fax # Email Violation Type: Project Type: Authorizations Required: Site Visits RePsponndf nt Site Visits sen93 R Present nt No Permit ® Private/Community Major © CAMA ❑ 513 El❑ Permit Condition ❑ Govt./Public ©0// Minor D&F —1 Q ❑ Expired Permit ❑ Commercial 0 General ❑ ❑ Inconsistentw/ Rules Tier Level` I 11 III 11 Violation 11 Location and Site D11 es11 c11 ription Lat/Long 3, ° 7� 35 IV "15`37 53.6D W Loc f Shoreline Length Project Location: County Street Address/ State Road/ Lot #(s) SAV: Not Sure Yes No Yes No C fl e / J�U Sandbags: Not Sure t' 1 G 7 U I (i LL.JeS JOuv Silr2 rr' PNA: Yes �jdl ' Adjacent Subdivision '—''++ ORW: Yes � Adjacent City I�Gt./etC tt�n ZIP �1 Q7 q S �� Crit. Hab. Yes la Yes No Phone # ( Cr ) r 20 — y1523 River Basin •� cc Photos pp l� 5(SL�h a Oman /unkn) Waiver Required Yes No Adj. Wlr. Body "Lhnn1L In DWQ Buffer Area Yes N Closest Maj. Wtr. Body ROLE A e ✓< Sao J Specify DWQ Buffer if applicable: NOV Date CNOV Date 7j27/f7 Penalty Assessment Sent to Respondent Date Rcvd. by Dist. Mgr. Dale Ass g+erCEIVEOes AUG :31 2017 Initial Req. Comp. Date Date Comp. Observed 7J.040g Ref. App./Permit Fee Extension Granted Yes No Restoration Letter Acceptance Date to $ Recomm. Assess. I DCM Assess. $ Penalty I Cxyt'fiA Is '3.aQ. la Willful/Intent. $ $ No $ $ Continuing Investigative L $ e1�0 $ Total Formal Assessments, Appeals and Reductions Date Long Form Submitted Assessment Appealed: Yes No Date Formal CPA Submitted Penally modified Final Assessment $ Date Attorney General's Office for Injunction or Formal Collection Date sent to AG Respondent not responsive to penalty/NOV ❑ Injunction to complete restoration Date Collection Let. Sent Date Demand Let. Sent Violation Activities and Impacts AECs Affected: Wetlands Impacted<Y@0 No If yes, which types: 0 A PTfU EAS) PTSS `MA SA DS CJ SY JR LS TY PWS: FC: SS SC SP IF BF 40 Other: Restoration Required by the Respondent Yes No Dimensions in excess of permit/ unauthorized activities Dimensions to restore Final dimensions allowed Actually restored Development Activities r4P Once,! b ♦r Habitat Description pp n 1 NOTES: 'd 16 S, uDs,Ved o�,* VieA4% L,tW d '/Ar i k, d Wlet CL w Kc,W'e r,6,J Rsh ♦,n, — /A o..,� Closing Payment Received $ Date Date Case Closed