SB_17-21_ Burney/Goh (2)

Sunset Beach SB-17.21
Local Government Permit Number
CAMA
MINOR DEVELOPMENT
PERMIT 4 -
as authorized by the State of North Carolina, Department of Environmental Quality
and the Coastal Resources Commission for development in an area of environment
concern pursuant to Section 113A-118 of the General Statutes, "Coastal Area
Management"
Issued to Robert B. Burney and Kimberly B. Goh, authorizing development in the Estuarine Shoreline (AEC) at
9297 Peakwood Drive SW, in Sunset Beach, Brunswick County as requested in the permittee's application,
dated September 25, 2017, initially received by the Town on September 25, 2017 and completely received by the
Town on January 30, 2018. This permit, issued on February 6, 2018, is subject to compliance with the
application and site drawing (where consistent with the permit), all applicable regulations and special conditions
and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may subject the permittee to a fine, imprisonment or civil
action, or may cause the permit to be null and void.
This permit authorizes: Construction of retaining walls for landscaped terraces stormwater drainage system.
(1) All proposed development and associated construction must be done in accordance with the permitted site drawing
dated received by the Town on January 30, 2018.
(2) All construction must conform to the N.C. Building Code requirements, the Town of Sunset Beach Unified
Development Ordinance and all other local, State and Federal regulations, applicable local building and zoning
ordinances and NFIP Flood Regulations.
(3) Any change or changes in the plans for development, construction, or land use activities will require a re-evaluation
and modification of this permit.
(4) A copy of this permit shall be posted or available on site. Contact this office at 910-579-6297 for a final inspection at
completion of work.
(Additional Permit Conditions on Page 2)
This permit action may be appealed by the permittee or other qualified persons
within twenty (20) days of the issuing date. This permit must be on the project
site and accessible to the permit officer when the project is inspected for
compliance. Any maintenance work or project modification not covered under
this permit, require further written permit approval. All work must cease when this
permit expires on:
December 31, 2021
In issuing this permit it is agreed that this project is consistent with the local Land
Use Plan and all applicable ordinances. This permit may not be transferred to
another party without the written approval of the Division of Coastal
Management.
Ara�4.Marzi0b, II
CAMA LOCAL PERMIT OFFICIAL
700 Sunset Blvd N
Sunset Beach, NC 28468
PERMITTEE
(Signature required if conditions above apply to permit) E D sJ
DCNI WILMINGTON, NC
FEB 0 7 2018

Name: Robert B. Burney and Kimberly B. Goh
Minor Permit # SB-17-21
Date: February 6, 2018
Page 2 of 2
(5) The amount of impervious surface shall not exceed 30% of the lot area within 75 feet of the Normal High Water (Estuarine
Shoreline), in this case, 1867 square feet is authorized.
(6) All unconsolidated material resulting from associated grading and landscaping shall be retained on site by effective
sedimentation and erosion control measures. Disturbed areas shall be vegetated and stabilized (planted and mulched)
within 14 days of construction completion.
(7) Any proposed grading within the 30' buffer from the Normal High Water level must be contoured to prevent additional
stormwater runoff to the adjacent marsh and/or canal. This area shall be immediately vegetatively stabilized, and must
remain in a vegetated state.
(8) With exception of an elevated wooden walkway/stairs and 200 sq. ft. or less of elevated slatted uncovered wood decking,
no other development is authorized within 30 feet of the normal high water line, or the line previously established by the
existing structure relative to the redevelopment of the existing structure.
(9) Pursuant to 15A NCAC, Subchapter 7J.0406(b), this permit may not be assigned, transferred, sold or otherwise disposed of
to a third -party.
(10) Projects shall not increase stormwater runoff to adjacent estuarine and public trust waters.
(11) Prior to any development, silt fence shall be properly installed between all planned land disturbance and the adjacent
marsh, open water areas, and adjacent properties; the silt fence shall be properly maintained throughout the construction
period. Silt fence shall be installed such that it is properly toed -in to the soil.
SIGNATURE: DATE:
PERMITTEE
R EC 'VED
DCiM WILMINGTON, NC
FEB 0 7 201E

k n
V Locality Permit Number / I
Ocean Hazard Estuatine Stwmlinex._ ORW Shoreline Public Trust Shoreline Other
(Far official m w otalu)
GENERA L i NFORMATION
LAND OWNER
'.name IQebtr'tQ Qurnew�Kf�+�_���Q Go%i
Address P D. SOX -6:0:11 ^^ttom�
city Irllle Bed state _ $C Zip-.Jt5Z1 Phone [phone]
AUTHORIZED AGENT
Name
Address _—_--- --.--
City State Zip Phone
LOCATION OF PROJECT: (Address, street name and/or directions to site. If not oceanfront, what is the name of the
adjacentwaterbody.) g244t Peattkta J drive SIJ, CJ4h&*%1NC oZ8�6
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: (List all proposed construction and land diaturbance. )
U born , consimd 4e..Y4 ces gi near of ✓a,}, ; o sf&# -Fence a In s" s epfi SI-Ifetrt I
insi'� tJn7Fertines� Gah3�r[te�' aatiwe.� ait`IYtralat� __
SIZE OF LOT/PARCEL: square feet acres
PROPOSED USE: Residential _ (Single-fanuty Multi -family_ 1 Commercial/Industrial
Other V
TOTAL ENCLOSED FLOOR AREAPF A BUILDING IN THE OCEAN HAZARD AREA OF EN V MON-
MENTAL CONCERN (AF,C) square feet (includes all floors and roof covertxl decks)
SIZE OF BUILDING FOOTPRINT AND OTHER IMPERVIOUS OR BUILT -UPON SURFACES IN THE
COASTAL SHORELINE AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC): square feet
(Calculations includes the area of the roof/drip lice of all buildings, driveways, covered decks, concrete or masonry patios,
etc., that are within the applicable AEC. Attach your calculations with the project drawing,)
Choose the AEC area that applies to your property:
I,I(I) within 75 feet of Normal High Water/Normal Water Level for the Estuarine Shoreline AEC
(2) within 575 feet of Notmal High Water/ Normal Water Level for the Estuarine Shoreline AEC; adjacent to
Outstanding Resource Waters
(3)within 30 feet of Nonnal High Water/ Normal Water Level for the Public Trust Shoreline AEC
(Contact your Local Permit Officer if you are not acute which AEC applies to your property.)
STATE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT: Is the project located in an area subject to a estate Staxmwater
Manag4/ nt Permit issued by the NC Division of Watef Quality?
yxS NO_
if yes, list the total built upon area/impervions surface allowed for your lot or parcel: 810 square &et.
b�"d-4�j Gz
W0 o
N
OTHER PERMITS MAY RE REQUIREDThe activity You art planning may require permits other thAn tlCAIZA rnimtCAevelop-
ment permit. As a service we have compiled a listing of the kinds of permits that might be required. We suggeV yo?TLr::.k v�ti the list
with your LPO to determine if anv of these apply to your project. Zoning, Drinking Water Well, Septic Tank ttur,6tltarJeuita rite
treatment systeml, Huuding, Electrical. Plumbing, Heating and Air Conditiouing, Insulation and Energy CwtA FLA C jification,
Sand Rune, Sediment Control, Subdivision Approval, Mobile Home Park Approval, Highway Connection. 1.1
STATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP; U
1, the undersigned, an applicant for a LAMA minor development permit, being either the owner of pi opQ in an AEC or a
person authorized to act as an agent for purposes of applying for a LAMA minor development permit, certify that the person
listed as landowner on this application has a significant interest in the real property described therein. This interest can be
described as: (check one) r
V an owner or Fecord title, Title is vested in —see Deed Book 3694
page —�M-f. in the --8 r%r=W i sl County Registry of Deeds.
_an owner by Virtue of inheritance. Applicant is an heir to the estate of
probate was is �� County.
if other interest, such as written contract or lease. explain below or use a separate sheet & attach to this application.
NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS:
I furthertnore certify that the following persons are owners of properties adjoining this property. I afftrm than I have given
ACTUAL NOTICE to each of thoto concerning my intent to develop this property and to apply for a LAMA permit.
( hie) (Address)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
FOR DEVELOPERS IN OCEAN HAZARD AND ESTUARINE HAZARD AREAS:
1 acknowledge that the land owner is aware that the proposed development is planned fvr an area which may be susceptible
to erosion and/or flooding. I acknowledge that the local pemtit officer has explained to me the particular hazard problems
associated with this lot. This explanation was accompanied by reconiniendations concerning stabilization and floodproofing
techniques.
PERMISSION TO ENTER ON LAND:
I furthermore certify that 1 ant authorized to grant and do in fact grant permiasiva to the local permit officer and his agents to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection whit evaluating information related to this permit application.
This application includes general information (this form), a site drawing as described or the back of this application., the
ownership statement, the AEC hazard notice where necessary, a check for $100.00 made payable to the locality, and any
infonitanou as may be provided orally by the applicant. the details of the application as described by these -sources are
incorporated wabout reference in any permit which may be issued. Deviation from these details wit) constitute a violation
of any permit. Any person developing in an AEC without permit is subject to civiL criminal and administrative action.
This the "th day of 'Le dbea+brt - , 201_
Landowner or person authorized to act as his agent for p se of fllirig a LAMA permit application.

TO: Robert Burney
DATE: 9/1/17
LOCATION: Parcel #2550002830
9297 Peakwood Drive
Sunset Beach, NC 28468
OWNER: Robert Burney
SEP 2 5 2017
The County's Stormwater Requirements have been met for controlling stormwater on this
lot based on the following conditions:
1. More than 4 inches of fill will be added to the site to construct a building with gravel
driveway and parking. Approximately 2,310 sf of impervious will be added.
2. All stormwater runoff from the roof area will be collected in gutters and downspouts
and directed to two infiltration beds containing 30 feet of 3-pipe EZ Flow Bundles
each as per the plans provided.
3. The remainder of the lot will be graded to maintain existing drainage patterns with
runoff to adjacent properties minimized to the maximum extent possible.
4. All necessary erosion control measures are in place prior to grading the lot.
5. A floodplain development permit and CAMA permit must be issued by Sunset
Beach before construction
6. All pervious surfaces must be adequately stabilized upon completion of construction.
Please note that minimum setback requirements between the infiltration beds and the septic
areas must be met. Please contact Brunswick County Environmental Health to verify.
There is a $50 fee for the stormwater permit. Please call [phone] for a final storrnwaber
inspection of the site once the home has been constructed before CO. The underground
infiltration system will need to be certified by the engineer once complete.
E� VET•,
Brigit Flora, PE, CFM DC+M WILMINGTON, NC
Stormwater Engineer
FEB 0 6 2013

cc
ri-
to
M
RECEa
SEP 25 2017 r`
0
0
0
Bti'
0
0
DaterN n Mich elk L2fat'd Rey.-r,b.sf
Adjacent pe Owner
�t9 l �
City, State, Zip Code
Dear Adjacent Property:
U.S. Postal Service
CERTIFIED MAIL' RECEIPT
Domestic !Mail Only
This letter is to inform you that I, )Vert S. &rne 4 have applied for a CAMA Minor
Property Owner
Permit on my property at 9019 F6 k&JWJ SW in Brunswick County
Property Address
County. As required by CAMA regulations, I have enclosed a copy of my permit application and project
drawing(s) as notification of my proposed project No action is required from you or you may sign and return
the enclosed no objection form. If you have any questions or comments about my proposed project, please
contact me at $43 --T?5- _d 836 ,or by mail at the address listed below. if you wish to
Applicants Telephone
file written comments or objections with the Town of Sunset Beach CAMA Minor Permit Program, you may submit
them to:
Hiram J. Marziano, ti
Town of Sunset Beach
700 Sunset Blvd. N
Sunset Beach, NC 28468
Sincerely,
Property Owner
P,o.
Mailing Address
x4rtk *e&4A,
City, State, Tap Code
1-?-VEC)
DClvi WILMINGTON, NC
FEB 0 6 2018

C
S�F 2 5 2017 i1
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER STATEMENT
FOR CAMA MINOR PERMITS
1 hereby certify that I own property adjacent to I wbert- 8 's
(Name of Property Owner)
property located at 1719 * Pad "C 5LAJ
Address, Lot, Block, Road, etc.)
on .rGW , in lgrWnStJk7 6urt�A , N.C.
(Waterbody) (Town and/or Cou )
He has described to me as shown in the attached application and project drawing(s), the development he
is proposing at that location, and, I have no objections to his proposal.
(APPLICATION AND DRAWING OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ATTACHED)
Signature
IQabeet 8. Bkrne�—
Print or Type Name
OU-545-b93D
Telephone Number
LAD Date
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
FEB 0 5 2018

JAN 3 0 2018
January 25, 2018
Kathryn Michele Langford Rev. Trust
9301 Peakwood Drive SW
Calabash, NC 28467
Dear Michele and Bookie,
As part of our CAMA Minor Permit application for our property at 9297 Peakwood
Drive SW, we are required to again formally notify you due to a revision in the Storm
water/Grading plan for the project. This change is the correction of the location of
the retaining walls for the terraces.
In the original copy of the plan we mailed you, the draftsman had incorrectly moved
the location of the walls slightly. All other aspects of the plan remain unchanged.
A copy of the revised plan is enclosed.
I have included contact information for the Mr. Marziano below. He is the Sunset
Beach CAMA Minor Permit administrator handling the application.
Regards,
/�&.7
Robert Burney
P.O. Box 71077
Myrtle Beach, SC 29572
[e-mail]
Hiram J. Marziano, H
U.S. Postal Service
CERTIFIED MAIL.. RECEIPT
11 (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided)
• . • For delivery Information visit n— =h.it- �........___ ___
^'
ill Poetepi T
Cerliiied Fee $ Cl 'n' 0
O
Retum Receipt Fee "
0 (Endorsement Requ)red)
Restricted Delivery Fee
Cl (Endorsement Required)
ill
MTotal Postage & Fees $
!ti
ED TWA l�7rC�le e
- -- --- ��
O 5`rrea6 itpf. No.; -------- -----------�
N or Po Box No. 9 3Q�i
.i
Postma* _
Here >•
G.V
©
l3 1i2`� v
� Q

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2017-02147 County: Brunswick County U.S.G.S. Quad: Little River
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner/Applicant: Robert Burney
PO Box 71077
Myrtle Beach, SC 29572
Size (acres) 1
Nearest Waterway Intracoastal Waterway
USGS HUC 03040208
Nearest Town Calabash
River Basin Lower Pee Dee
Coordinates Latitude: 33.8722486299595
Longitude:-78.5523404025607
Location description: The twoverty is located at 9297 Peakwood Drive SW, Calabash, Brunswick County, NC 28467
(PIN:103415548798).
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
_ There are waters, including wetlands, on the above described project area, that may be subject to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands, have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently
accurate and reliable. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process,
including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation
requirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all
waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional
waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program
Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an
appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
_ There are wetlands on the above described property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since the
waters, including wetlands, have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be
used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely an
effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction overall of the waters„including wetlands, at the project area, which is
not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the
waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a
timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
X There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC
§ 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period
not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
X There are waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ We recommend you have the waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps mq'�YY-..r,lnt be
accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to'Qdld %et a d6lineati�
can be verified by the Corps. DC,,,j WILMIN R
FEB 0 2018
Page 1 of 2

SAW-2017-02147
X The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on your property have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps.
_ The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
_ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to
determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit
may constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material,
construction or placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the
Army permit may constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If
you have any questions regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Brennan Dooley at
[phone] or Brennan.J.Dooley(iT�usace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Please see attached AJD Form.
D. Remarks:
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 2/11/18.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.** DOOLLEY.BRENNAN.JOHN.151 ` Digitally
NNANJOHN.1512992613i c=US;=uy Government
2992613 00LEY.BRENNANJ0HN.1512992613
Corps Regulatory Official: / Date: 2017.12.13 09:49:43-05'00'
Date: December 13, 2017 Expiration Date: December 13, 2022

SAW-2017-02147
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to
do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
http://corpsmgpu.usace.army.mil/cm apex/Pp=136:4:0.

SAW-2017-02147
Applicant: Robert Burney File Number: SAW-2017-02147 Date: December 13,
2017
Attached
is:
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
E to is ding ` he above
decision. Additional information may be found at http://www.usace.army.mil/inct/functions/ew/cecwo/rep, or
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

SAW-2017-02147
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is alread in the administrative record.
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division,
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: Brennan Dooley
CESAD-PDO
69 Darlington Avenue
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
Wilmington, NC 28403
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the o ortuni to participate in all site investi ations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Brennan Dooley, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): December 13, 2017
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Robert Burney - 9297 Peakwood Drive SW, SAW-
2017-02147
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: Brunswick County City: Calabash
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 33.87224862995950N, Long.-78.55234040256071 W
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17 726400.16 3750687.53
Name of nearest waterbody: Intracoastal Waterway
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Intracoastal Waterway
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): Coastal Carolina, 03040208
® Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a different
JD form:
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s):10/24/17
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There M "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the review
area. [Required]
® Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
❑ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There E "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): t
❑ TNWs, including territorial seas
® Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
❑ Relatively permanent watersz (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non -wetland waters: linear feet, wide, and/or acres.
Wetlands: 0.15 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: _�n Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non -regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):
❑ Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
Z For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
' Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.

-2-
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section IH.A.1 and Section HI.D.I. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.I.; otherwise, see Section HIM below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent':
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non -navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section HI.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section IH.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section HI.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size:
Drainage area:
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through _ tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are river miles from TNW.
Project waters are river miles from RPW.
Project waters are aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5:
Tributary stream order, if known:
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that poly):
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man-made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man -altered). Explain:
Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

-3-
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes:
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type/% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry:
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: _
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: _
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: � Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: ®. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑ shelving
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑ sediment deposition
❑ water staining
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM.' Explain:
❑ the presence of litter and debris
❑ destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ the presence of wrack line
❑ sediment sorting
❑ scour
❑ multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ abrupt change in plant community
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ High Tide Line indicated by: ❑ Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum;
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings;
❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
6A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

-4-
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: _. Explain:
Surface flow is: _
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: _. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are river miles from TNW.
Project waters are aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from:
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the _ floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if an
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis:
Approximately acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.
For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/M Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent

-5-
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
❑ TNWs: linear feet, wide, Or acres.
® Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: 0.15 acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial:
❑ Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet wide.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non-RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet, wide.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
8See Footnote # 3.

-6-
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly abutting an RPW:
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally" Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters?
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
❑ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
❑ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
❑ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):"
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet, wide.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
F. NON -JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
❑ Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
❑ Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

-7-
❑ Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, wide.
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a fmding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, wide.
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
❑ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
® Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:1:24K; Little River
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): Google Earth and Simsuite
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable/supporting case law:
❑ Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

�OL�OL��Q�m
.w x•.� Dn .n
v+ Ma m. o un O
� ..•D —>oar— mw D..a
sr�rrr,�
Jb[ ro[ An m wma wn Imw Mx �) uw ,�
'Tmoas' x
ofAZOroLii +x Wue ax •el Y
DvvD .
'A, M 4 H 'A� T 1 A.o2 N.J x Ow. m x� . w�iierw min vmiA rnv
®X.
Pf3
♦♦♦
Mea ,aE
w.w Axw �wm...D xr<'f
rpo...m r,we p .•. Am e, ,alai A• w.D~ b/wyL 'z
e
`_A m.e
ana Aa ww'+a.D m.. i
rnxw
R
trol/nxz '5� g D �M
bOCY-KL (OL°) �®rpll�ll}yl//
GLEE-KKL �'x 'mlWwuS
\ m
..�D...r u eroi 'n iowdq
•rz '
(a.t n.DDr wwJD» cLaz >d
(.Nt M1n MLDxI) LIOZ 'DZ ADa '+tl
\
wJ ei . o
\
Oz, OB o.
\
'0'x u,a^DJgxw° 4N•w[ nleimx5
x4—n8 '6 # gozf •1 ftaw,n8—Ye9 a 6 hajaagtuV
Fas r+ws nax - xMDMDxaro D�MniK 3n - r-L r.Dmf - r Irvn : Irvn •m
a a.JDs avDDaDDDL DDD ax)DDDt aNL 'A<De�De
b tee.,
11 Z 'bd 'Z[ ODD JDw
C,9/b[SC
i� xwxa,ot w �wrwA
a
oww \
MP
—0 �
rxax-t .w.w mrn
NOb LL10-3 YO
30NVJ,3nrvO� .qd 1ON - .11l3ba�
' AM DNMm �.OUM.
Lbw,ulw w4u A., �W

From: Hiram Marziano[mailto:hmarziano(a)sunsetbeachnc.gov]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 11:25 AM
To: '[e-mail]'
Cc: 'Farrell, Sean C'
Subject: SB-17-21: 9297 Peakwood Drive SW - Update
Mr. Burney,
I just wanted to follow up with you from our meeting last week (Wednesday, October 11, 2017 @
11:30AM) on site with Sean Farrell of DCM. (I apologize for not doing this sooner, but I have been out
sick recently).
As we discussed on -site, we have suspended the timeframe for review of the normal 25 day review
period until you supply the needed information we discussed. This information being the updated and
accurate site plan of the proposed work within the AEC, that being the installation of the retaining walls.
We also need the delineation/determination regarding possible 404 wetlands from the Army Corps of
Engineers.
As of the time of our conversations when we discussed this in the field 16 days had elapsed from your
submittal, once we have the remaining information 9 days for review will still remain. Please keep us
updated on your progress.
Have a nice day and do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.
Hiram J. Marziano, 11, CFM
Director of Planning
Town of Sunset Beach
700 Sunset Blvd. N
Sunset Beach, NC 28468
910.579.0068
www.sunsetbeachnc.gov
Please note: Pursuant to NC General Statutes, Chapter 132, this message and any attachments
that may be sent in response to it may be considered public records and therefore are
subject to public record requests for review and copying under the Public Records Law.

.G�
Locality _. Permit Number /
Ocean Hazard Estuarine Shoreline ORW Shoreline Public Trust Shoreline Other
(For official mse only)
GENERAL INFORMATION
LAND OWNER
NameIT
_ IQobertQ,Qurney ate_ n,�+betle B o _-
Address _Pa. SD 1-4
City 'qly le 8C-A state S;r— zip 215 2 Phone [phone]
AUTHORIZED AGENT
Name
Address
State Zip Phone
LOCATION OF PROJECT: (Address, street name author directions to site. If not oceanfront, what is the name of the
adjacentwaterbody.)gkj* &Y"�fttl Qr;VC5&J CA14Iayah AX 41461L
1rJJ
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT. (List all proposed construction and land disturbance,),
_611161yf, consdnxaf 4effa.ces at re,"- af t.f, inA# •%ncC t in smfi_e- %!!dc in)
insIa.[t waJecLnes}canmi'rt d gruttel draw-o 4
SIZE OF LOT/PARCEL; square feet I acres
PROPOSED USE: Residential _ (Single-family Multi-tamtly—) Commercial/Industrial
Other 7-
TOTAL ENCLOSED FLOOR AREA F A BUILDING IN THE OCEAN HAZARD AREA OF ENV IRON -
MENTAL CONCERN (AFC): __� square feet (include. all floors and roof covered decks)
SIZE OF BUILDING FOOTPRINT AND OTHER IMPERVIOUS OR BUILT -UPON SURFACES IN THE
COASTAL SHORELINE AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC):._ square Bret
(Calculations includes the area of the mof/drip line of all buildings, driveways, covered decks, concrete or masonry patio,
etc., that are within the applicable AEC. Attach your calculations with the project drawing.)
Choose the AEC area that applies to your property:
L4,11) within 75 feet of Normal High Water/Norma) Water Level for the Estuarine Shoreline AEC
(2) within 575 fe0f Normal High Water/ Normal Watet Level for the Estuarine Shoreline AEC, adjacent to
Outstanding el toome Waters
(3)witht fee�f Ntrrtnal High Water/ Normal Water Level for the Public Trust Shoreline AEC
(Contact err Lo pI r t' rY Officer if you are not sure which AEC applies to your property.)
STATE STORM WLilANAGEMEN'T PERMIT IS We project located in an area subject to a State Storrttwater
Marrag�erj' Fni nit b3 the NC Division of Wator Qualit)O
YES ✓
Ify e&, list th�& i h u< att;wnnpervtuus surface allowed for your lot or parcel: a� 3%�square feet.
om
p
OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED The activity you art planning may require pzttnits other than the CAMA minor develop-
ment permit. Asa service we have compiled a listing of the kinds of permits that might be requited. We suggest you check over the list
with your LPO to determine if auy of these apply to your project. Zoning, Di inking Water Well, Septic Tank (or other sanitary waste
treatment system), Building. Electrical. Plumbing, Heating and Air Conditioning, Insulation and Energy Conservation, FIA Cenificarion,
Sand Dune, Sediment Control, Subdivision Approval, Mobile Horne Park Approval, Highway Connection. and others.
S"FATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP:
1, the undersigned, an applicant for a CAMA minor development permit, being either the owner of property in an AEC or a
person authorized to act as an agent for purposes of applying for a CAMA minor development permit, certify that the person
listed as landuwner on this application has a significant interest in the real property described therein. Timis interest can be
described as: (check one)
�an owner or record title, Title is vested in inn _ see Deed Book 3689
page _ in the Cotutty pegistry of Deeds.
_an owner by virtue of inheritance. Applicant is an heir to the estate of
probate was in I County.
if other interest, such as written contract or lease, explain below or use a separate sheet & attach to this application.
NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS:
1 furthermore certify that the following persons are owners of properties adjoining this property. t affirm that 1 have given
ACTUAL NOTICE to each of then concerning my intent to develop this property and to apply for a CAMA permit,
(Name) (Address)
H
(2) It►e# r~3 !Sterne es,el`ir;.,tberk..1S �h YOB /0 ��/rt_ r3ga�i ax ac�,2s 3__ _ r
(a)
FOR DEVELOPERS IN OCEAN HAZARD AND ES'IUAPINN HAZARD AREAS:
i acknowledge that the land owner is aware that the proposed development is planned for an area which may be susceptible
to erosion and/or flooding. I acknowledge that the local peroiit officer has explained to me the particular hazard problems
associated with this lot This explanation was accompanied by recommendations concerning stabilization and floodpr000fing
techniques.
PERMISSION TO ENTER ON LAND:
I furthermore certify that I ant authorized to grant and do in fact grant penuis-sion to the Iut:al permit officer and his agents to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related w this permit application.
This application includes: general information (this form), a site drawing as described on the back of this application, the
ownership statement, the AEC: hazard notice where necessary, a check for S100.00 made payable to the locality, and any
infbrmatiou as may be provided orally by the appiicant.'rhe details of the application as described by these sources are
incorporated without reference in any permit which may be issued. Deviation from these details will Constitute a violation
of any permit. Any person developing in an AEC without permit is subject to civil, criminal and administrative action.
This it,. "th day of f!S9§ST§F:' , it) L *
/T.ef�✓rC3•
Landowner or person authorized to act as his agent for p use of tiling a CAMA permit application.
z
0

I. Sa " T. kanm wU1y INd Itl. Pbt q & - YWa my
nNaM.Im ft— w ad" —" afaN ;z Iny tNDaN.Im
•4sakttl.n rsealW 1n 9.ak Pop -mod My
(outs) I ee r4tAN. I Wal W Own ~ not 4 .. on
tl.my NAeetW ee dean ham Hlamatl.n ten• a• now
ha4•n: that U1. roue d prwww w cdauMtW Y 1:7509t;
the WN Nat cos PnPa.! In .ao• d— •IN G9 47-W
w m,wd.a 11a— my ro." dpat , fl—I, numaa
aW .stl W, SN !oy a All, AD.. 2017
1 wd- am . d Im0 o.tl OatrtRY U,•t m� e/wY N of m wYIY�yy Mar r yer net or•ols a nee •Ir••l
.h r" m e!.thp A—L
PRELIMINARY — NOT FOP CONVEYANCE
�r,•yw OR RECORDATION
IJnu.s Money L-27y8
NQTrs
t Arw DMemHM by OW.
2. ThY Properly 1s "00 W mY on! a w.mmt..
rttrtr Id1.w. "pd-et-w1. d r•eva, p.•n,n,snta oY,mar
ona/w r.pisl,aib .MNR n,.y s.w m4 Wink W ,..s
d tlN. wawtY
3 Thl. lo.. vet osrtlry I.pt If" t. N4to . N It"ll;
W rM.• MPm. U.r. a " Plat ere!! mt4ln .oaatae.
Ipd� kn as a.n hIP W W aeenmrls. Moan on
4. FEYA FNW MQP W10"I.. WCW w k•lay M fYW ZONE N. AE 16'. YF I
Canm Wy Pa it 31&W9 1034 J. 6/2/U..
5. Ta. ticp Par" No. - 255OW28 O
8. 2 g - T,,— •F 9an..t 84srh: W-1
7. sre.ae
F—t 8tl
R•a: 202 m 25' ar CAVA R.aakaamts
SNc 199
8. ye,1oM Dolam: NAw 10
0. W W aasMW ok.pwNN.s „Al p
MC 9.ldek: R1N.
,6 RIM flout ]�\e,a .Lamm a» kW, a.ar,. FI—dpW I N,'MM
RFTTTIFN=
Dee! 0.4 Pap .M
Nap c wvt Pap e
f- EdMP MITIJYww Ply( kaw sa arWal P.rM9)
p- Nee km w Ym ppOORR7.RLL.r q0. 01P n.RW .w
$ Fd41Y,a cwnr a.W j
{} NC DOT R/W 1
M/qtc Ra9rwM tor
C• lbll Pak,t R/91 18y,t d w19'
Etl d" cane.l• mat. A aoa.m IneA
SUa1EY ROWT I9WMY PEANNOOD DIVIC
Smnaary, hw tacaUa, a,a Tapa9raphic Survey Of
1 Ac. Tract A Tract A - Sctim 1-A - D.0 Steam! D.abpnlnt - Puke 9MOW4 Su96
"Kimberley B C Coh—Burney & Robert B. Burney"
Shdlott• T—hlp W—ViCk County. N.C.
0 40 80 120
Graphic S.W. - Fat
Scd. 1' . 40' June 5, 2017
991lEy 4. tLm9 k Aaaoeiates
117
6h.9utt., N.C. 29459-1117
[phone]
(11110) 754-5466 F9a
K .I.nEY M UPM Ne [N1f1'Bi M1E9r
5EP 9 S T017
Tree (
D—ro w
Trw /
D•soptim
Trw 9
D•.olption
Tree /
D•.crptlon
252
8' Ook
276
7' K".y
294
1S' Httlmr
389
25' 0!F
263
14' Pk.
279
11' Hlaka
559
r Hldwr
164
12Pin.
260
11' Oak
3"
12- Hkk
380
7' N IG
Wle
PM
ZM
W Do*
346
12' Hlekar
W
M
206
6' Hickwy
282
6' Oak
346
7' X
362
1Y _NaW.H.
267
7- HWWy
263
IT Oak
347
8' M.O.
268
15' PI,,.
284
11' Oot
348
IY ook
393
14' lb
IT HIcko
_
2t)5
1S' Pin.
3"
10' H
594
9' 4
270
11' Hickory
296
2W Pin.
350
IV Ash
3"
9' Oak
271
9 Oak
287
W Hi-
351
7' Mg,,iw
3"
IT r
272
12' Oak
288
11' Nid,ory
352
13'
307
9'
273
19' Oak
289
20' PW
353
9'
398
27{
Oa
290
20' Oak
754
11'
399
vp�.
275
6
10' AM
400
Oak
t Hick
Y is
401
1 2n 120 Pm• 1 293 I10 Mlbcry1 357 1 14 Vdt I

TO: Robert Burney
DATE: 9/1/17
LOCATION: Parcel #2550002830
9297 Peakwood Drive
Sunset Beach, NC 28468
OWNER: Robert Burney
�-�FXVED
SEP 2 5 20 77
The County's Stormwater Requirements have been met for controlling stormwater on this
lot based on the following conditions:
1. More than 4 inches of fill will be added to the site to construct a building with gravel
driveway and parking. Approximately 2,310 sf of impervious will be added.
2. All stormwater runoff from the roof area will be collected in gutters and downspouts
and directed to two infiltration beds containing 30 feet of 3-pipe EZ Flow Bundles
each as per the plans provided.
3. The remainder of the lot will be graded to maintain existing drainage patterns with
runoff to adjacent properties minimized to the maximum extent possible.
4. All necessary erosion control measures are in place prior to grading the lot.
5. A floodplain development permit and CAMA permit must be issued by Sunset
Beach before construction.
6. All pervious surfaces must be adequately stabilized upon completion of construction.
Please note that minimum setback requirements between the infiltration beds and the septic
areas must be met. Please contact Brunswick County Environmental Health to verify.
There is a $50 fee for the stormwater permit. Please call [phone] for a final stormwater
inspection of the site once the home has been constructed before CO. The underground
infiltration system will need to be certified by the engineer once complete.
&�� A 6-WN-
Brigit Flora, PE, CFM
Stormwater Engineer
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
OCT 04 2011

RECEIVED
SEP 2 5 2017
i
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER STATEMENT
FOR CAMA MINOR PERMITS
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to ' wOu'� B LJtRfhG4 's
(Name of Property Owner)
property located at ` A91 Pe j "e, 6W
Address, Lot, Block, Road, etc..)
lGW p
on , in runSLOi4% C.ouJ1j�% , N.C.
(Waterbody) (Town and/or Coun )
He has described to me as shown in the attached application and project drawing(s), the development he
is proposing at that location, and, I have no objections to his proposal.
(APPLICATION AND DRAWING OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ATTACHED)
Signature
� obts't Q• Btirh _4
Print or Type Name
843-6 15-6930
Telephone Number
9 m aolZ-
Date
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
0 C T 0 4 2017

SEP 2 5 2017
9 ;.5
Date f rN n m, chellc 7-
AdjacentJpe Chmer
9�2AJ ..> al ,jjri 5(a7
MX72 ALddrX. AX a8�6
City, State, Zip Code
Dear Adjacent Property:
Postal
ServiceRTIFIED
MAIL?
RECEIPT
L
estic Mail
Onfv
livery information.
visit
ca.r
Co
co
S
O
0
CO
M
t3
X
O
N
ra
0
This letter is to inform you that I, Bert Q"8urne 44--- have applied for a CAMA Minor
Property Owner
Permit on my property at 9a9-; f&kwooci Dr; ae SW in Brunswick County
Property Address
County. As required by CAMA regulations, I have enclosed a copy of my permit application and project
dra,Mng(s) as notification of my proposed project. No action is required from you or you may sign and return
the enclosed no objection form. If you have any questions or comments about my proposed project, please
contact me at 743 —9g3 _6 5 3D ,or by mail at the address listed below. If you wish to
Applicants Telephone
file written comments or objections with the Town of Sunset Beach CAMA Minor Permit Program, you may submit
them to:
Sincerely,
Property Owner "
/° D. 16&X -A/011
Mailing Address
my,-tk Rem,
City; State, Zip Code
Hiram J. Marziano, Il
Town of Sunset Beach
700 Sunset Blvd. N
Sunset Beach, NC 28468
``4EGt=IVED
GCM WILMINGTON, NC
0 C T 04 2017

MrINITY MAP
Amvj
INUI IU Z1L.ALG
GENERAL NOTES a MAINTENANCE FOR EZ FLOW INFILTRATION DRAINAGE
SYSTEM.
PLOT PLAN PROVIDED BY
A
ALL LOT DIMENSIONS, SURVEY DATA, a
CONTRACTONCUENT. SURVEY BY BOBBY LONG SURVEYING. TITLED
'BOUNDARY, TREE LOCATION AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF 1 ACRE
TRACT a TRACT A- SECTION IA- D.E. STANALAND DEVELOPMENT -
PARKER STANALAND SUED.'. DATED JUNE 5, 2017.
OF
THIS STORMWATER PLAN WAS DEVELOPED TO SATISFY THE INTENT
THE TOWN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ORDINANCES. HOWEVER, MWALL
ASSOCIATES. PA DOES NOT CERTIFY THE SITE SOILS AND SEASONAL
'\
HIGH WATER TABLE (SHWT) CHARACTERISTICS TO SATISFY OTHER
ORDINANCE STANDARDS. OWNERMONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR
VERIFICATION OF SUITABLE SOILS FOR INFILTRATION AND SHW T LOCATION
ti
TO MAINTAIN 7 SEPARATION FROM BOTTOM OF INFILTRATION TRENCHES
'
IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS. IF SOILS SCIENTIST OR
\�
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING DATA DO NOT CONFIRM SUITABIUTY,
A_
`
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR PLAN REVISIONS.
C ONLY
21
EZ FLOW DRAINAGE SYSTEMS ARE FOR USE IN NON-7RPFF1 PREPS
INFILTRATION SYSTEMS MAY BE LOCATED IN ALTERNATE LOCATIONS ON
SILT iEN(Z (TrvJ \
THE LOT AS DESIRED. EXCEPT WITHIN RESTRICTED SETBACKS,
\
EASEMENTS, OR OTHER PROHIBITED AREAS, AS LONG AS RUNOFF FROM
\ \
ROOF AREA IS DISTRIBUTED PER PLAN.
BOTTOM OF INFILTRATION SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN LEVEL GRADE.
BE
1,320 9' TT ROOF AREA SMALL BE
GUTTERED ROOF
FOR A SHALLWATER
CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFICATION.
COLLECTION. WITH RUNOFF CWVEVED
ro INFILTRATION BEDS.
PROPOSED ROOF AREA SMALL BE DRAINED WITH GUTTERS AND
DOWNSPOUTS. AND BE DIRECTED TO INFILTRATION SYSTEM PER PLAN.
IF INFILTRATION SYSTEM FAILS. IT SHALL BE REMOVED, REPAIRED.
AND/OR REPLACED AS NEEDED TO RESTORE DESIGNED OPERATION.
EZ FLOW STORMWATER STORAGE CALCULATIONS.
Kathryn M. Langford
THE USE OF BUNDLED EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE SYNTHETIC AGGREGATE
Prap_w mpxrviou4
I R.M Ara: 1.320 SF
3579/613
UNITS IS PROPOSED TO CREATE STORAGE VOLUME FOR STORMWATER
TOWN ORDINANCE
Ptap—I Gm- A•n' 990 SF
Mop Cob. 32, Pg. 214
RUNOFF SUITABLE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH
TaMl Pmp—i BM -Upon Am2310 SF(5.3%)
REQUIREMENTS. PROPERTY OWNER AND CONTRACTOR ACCEPT FULL
RESPONSIBILITY FOR USE AND MAINTENANCE OF THIS PRODUCT.
Lot Arae:43.628 SF
Tract B
COMPASS POINTE ENGINEERING DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE INTEGRITY
Prop—i Rani A— to Be C AWCIAE -1,32D SF
OF THIS PRODUCT. BUT OFFERS ITS USE AT THE OWNER'S DISCRETION
Rv ff 1— 1.5 R,m 11 on 1 320 SF Roo( a 107%=
BASED ON REASONABLE DATA PROVIDED BY THE MANUFACTURER.
(1.5I 12) FT x 1,320 SF • 1� CF
REFERENCES. INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING AND
MECHANICAL OFFICIALS (VAPMO) STANDARD WPMO IGC-2762010,
34P px EZ FMN12WH BurdW Void CFpm* • 1 BD CF pN LF
ANCE OF
CERTIFICATION OF FZFLOW UNDER THIS STANDARD 'PERFORMANCE
DW 'P= EZ F1oN Vok CpcAy ` 31 CF pN LF
SILT FENCE
CHAMBER AND EZ12M SYSTEMS COMPARED TO CONVENTIONAL GRAVEL
Mtr•rnArl BAE Lenplh of DW 3P - EZ RI Burd. •
OMTLET(TYP )
SEPTIC TANK ST57EMS IN NORTH CAROUNA', PUBLISHED BY UEBLER.
195 CF 132 CFAF • 51.5'
BERKOWITZ SEUSHER, AVERY. DOLE. ARRINGTON. AND GRIMES.
CONSTRUCTION a FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED FOR ENGINEERING
2INFILTRATION BEDS TO HAVE DUAL 3.PIPE EZ FLOW
CERTIFICATION.
12M1H BUNDLES WITH LENGTH OF 30 NCh.
t �v
MGM d
EC SILT FENCE- OUTLET
-lB
30' X 35' EZ FLOW
OWLTRAMON am
(TYP.-SEE DETAIL
j�
DOIMSPOUT/CLEANOUT
SDONNECMON
(TVP-SEE DETAIL
V
\
y
o '.
I
\ \
1
/ I
r
ve
/ Co1TC1•I•
2—Story c
S.F.D. �(
9301
d°
UPPER LIMIT OF FILL UNE
TAPER 'PROPERTY UME'
WALL DOWN FROM I&W
ro 17.W
TOP OF WALL • 17.00' r
EXISTING TREE TO REMAM
WALL STRUCTURE TO BE
LOCATED 4' MINIMUM
FROM PROPERTY LINE
PER CONVERSATION MTH HIRAM
MARZIANO - PLANNING DIRECTOR,
WWN OF SUNSET BEACH
TAPER 'PR(7PFATY LIE'
WAIL DOMN FROM 1ZW
TD 11.00'
TOP OF WALL • It AO'
NOTE:
RETAINING WALLS TO BE DESIGNED BY OTHERS.
ALIGNMENT TO BE FIELD VERIFIED.
SILT FENCE
OU
TLET
�JL
LEGEND:
EXISTING CONTOURS:----2-& ---------
PROPOSED CONTOURS: 26
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION: • 1e.00
RETAINING WALL ALIGNMENT:
SILT FENCE:
SILT FENCE OUTLET:
DISTURBED AREA
UMITS (T\W.)
Steven h tvanne Patterson
2147/7036
Map Cob. X, Pg. 14
3:I (H: V) SLOPE
FROM TERRACES TO EARTHEN RAMP
;TOALLDOWIN13,DORM9'MC TREE REMOVED
7MC 7REEMAw FENCE.)
gSTURBED AREA
LIMITS (TTP.)
SILT FENCE
OUTIiT
�A3ac`
-T �Illc
r• _ham
% arc
EXISTING TREES
o TO REMAIN
ylc
Atlantic
Intracoastal
)later ay
/
/
/
I I.•X.
(
I
..JWII
o wC w mjP 1FL>mYu Ia�nxA• r w A. Ix[Nm
DOMISPOUT / CLEANa1T CDNNEEMON
BAWd� IptiApal AAW„0
MRR) f�EI E,•S >m
W IXP1W, (o,TMAP r
,•L AT •fAi6)
a:w �.p Icaa.loo A'
IIII= �ft III=IIIIIIII=�d,
NdWW nldd
IaiA, (NxIEGf A
110e,IVgl, / arrNan
M aFlAl: Wv US Tov
a ApE,M MNNE: CAv
p- a s..aE xoI
111m)
COxAFAIID PR
Ben
F7 FLOW DRAINAGE BUNDLE
INFlI TRA�W BEO
DISCLAIMER. -
THE PROPOSED RETAINING WALL ALONG THE
PROPERTY LINE, SEPARATING THE BURNEY AND
LANGFORD PARCELS HAS THE POTENTIAL TO
CAUSE TEMPORARY AND/OR LONG-TERM EROSION
OF THE GROUND SURFACE ALONG THE TOE OF
THE RETAINING WALL SAID EROSION HAS THE
POTENTIAL TO AFFECT BOTH PROPERTIES.
OWNER IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR INFORMING
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS OF THIS POSSIBLE
IMPACT AND FOR OBTAINING ANY AGREEMENTS
THAT MAY BE PRUDENT AND/OR NECESSARY FOR
SHORT-TERM OR LONG-TERM MAINTENANCE.
MCGILL ASSOCIATES UNDERSTANDS THROUGH
CORRESPONDENCE NTH THE TOWN OF SUNSET
BEACH THAT THE PROPOSED WALL PLACEMENT IS
IN COMPLIANCE WITH ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS,
BUT ASSUMES NO LIABILITY RELATIVE TO THE
CONSTRUCTION AND RELATED MAINTENANCE
ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT ELEMENT.
FINAL DRAWING NOT
ISSUED FOR
CONSTRUCTION
PLAN
AT n u w w x
CRAFHIC SCALE I INCH = 30 FEET
2' Q
I— 2
Q
i>> z
2 0
O I -
U
06
SHEET
C-1 01
NO I DATE I BY REVISION DESCRIPTON

VICINITY MAP
GENERAL NOTES 6 MAINTENANCE FOR EZ FLOW INFILTRATION DRAINAGE
SYSTEM:
ALL LOT DIMENSIONS, SURVEY DATA 6 PLOT PLAN PROVIDED BY
CONTRACTOWCUENT. SURVEY BY BOBBY LONG SURVEYING. TITLED
'BOUNDARY, TREE LOCATION AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF i ACRE
TRACT 6 TRACT A- SECTION I -A- DE STANALANND DEVELOPMENT -
PARKER STANK AND SUBD.-,DATED JUNE 5. 2D17.
THIS STORMWATER PLAN WAS DEVELOPED TO SATISFY THE INTENT OF
THE TOWN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ORDINANCES. HOWEVER, McGILL
ASSOCIATES, PA DOES NOT CERTIFY THE SITE SOILS AND SEASONAL
HIGH WATER TABLE (SHWO CHARACTERISTICS TO SATISFY OTHER
ORDINANCE STANDARDS. OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR
VERIFICATION OF SUITABLE SOILS FOR INFILTRATION AND SHA7 LOCATION
TO MOUNTAIN 7 SEPARATION FROM BOTTOM OF INFILTRATION TRENCHES
IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS. IF SCILS SCIENTIST OR
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING DATA DO NOT CONFIRM SUITABIUTY.
CONTACT ENGINEER FOR PLAN REVISIONS.
EZ FLOW DRAINAGE SYSTEMS ARE FOR USE IN NON -TRAFFIC AREAS ONLY.
INFILTRATION SYSTEMS MAY BE LOCATED IN ALTERNATE LOCATIONS ON
THE LOT AS DESIRED. EXCEPT WITHIN RESTRICTED SETBACKS.
EASEMENTS, OR OTHER PROHIBITED AREAS. AS LONG AS RUNOFF FROM
ROOF AREA IS DISTRIBUTED PER PLAN.
BOTTOM OF INFILTRATION SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN LEVEL GRADE.
CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFICATION.
PROPOSED ROOF AREA SWILL BE DRAINED WITH GUTTERS AND
DOWNSPOUTS, AND BE DIRECTED TO INFILTRATION SYSTEM PER PLAN.
IF INFILTRATION SYSTEM FAILS. IT SMALL BE REMOVED. REPAIRED,
AND/OR REPLACED AS NEEDED TO RESTORE DESIGNED OPERATION.
THE USE OF BUNDLED EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE SYNTHETIC AGGREGATE
UNITS IS PROPOSED TO CREATE STORAGE VOLUME FOR STORMWATER
RUNOFF SUITABLE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH TOWN ORDINANCE
REQUIREMENTS, PROPERTY OWNER AND CONTRACTOR ACCEPT FULL
RESPONSIBILITY FOR USE AND MAINTENANCE OF THIS PRODUCT.
COMPASS POINTE ENGINEERING DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE INTEGRITY
OF THIS PRODUCT, BUT OFFERS ITS USE AT THE OWNER'S DISCRETION
BASED ON REASONABLE DATA PROVIDED BY THE MANUFACTURER
REFERENCES: INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING AND
MECHANICAL OFFICIALS 0APMO) STANDARD IAPMO IGC-276-2OI0.
CERTIFICATION OF EZFLOW UNDER THIS STANDARD:'PERFORI E OF
CHAMBER AND EZ12DSH SYSTEMS COMPARED TO CONVENTIONAL GRAVEL
SEPTIC TANK SYSTEMS IN NORTH CAROUNA-. PUBUSHED BY UEBLER
BERKOWITZ BEUSHER. AVERY. OGLE. ARRINGTON. AND GRIMES.
CONSTRUCTION 6 FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED FOR ENGINEERING
CERTIFICATION.
1.320 SF OF ROOF AREA SHALL BE 1
GUTTERED FOR STORMWATER \ \ \I
COLLECTION. MINI RUNOFF CONVEYED
TO WILTRATION BEDS. \
EZ FLOW STORMWATER STORAGE CALCULATIONS: Kathryn M. Langford
3579/613
ProPo4ad Impervl°u4 Roof AIw-. 1.320 SF
Proposed Grawl Arm'. 9W SF Map Cab. 32, Pg. 214
ToW Propowd Bull) -Upon Anal 2.310 SF (5.3%)
Lot Area = 43.628 SF Tract B
prupoW Roof AIaa m SO, CotIMAtl . 1.320 SF
Rno6from 1.5- Ra—I on 1.320 SF Roof 010D%
(1.5112) FT X 1,320 SF • 105 CF I /
34Npa EZ FbN1203H Boma Void CNpatty = 1.60 CF par LF SILT FEIICE
DUM 34Ppa EZ F VO Cyadty - 32 CF Pw LF OuTI.ET(TYP.)
W— Bad Lw gM of Deal 3-Pp. EZ Fl- BMNa =
105 CF 132 CFILF -51.5'
2 INFILTRATION BEDS TO RAVE DUAL 3-MPE EZ FLOW ^
12osm BUNDLES WITH LENGTH OF 37"ch
b b;f
Z®7L d
aLY671O1 w"� w r.w
nr�A
EC SILT FENCE - OUTLET
0
CNlncnb
De-
2—Story
S.F.D.
93 11
UPPER LIMIT OF FILL LINE
TAPER PROPERTY LINE
WALL DOM IRON IB.00
TO 17.w
TOP OF MALL W 17.00- r
EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN
WALL STRUCTURE 10 BE
LOCATED 4� MINIMUM
FROM PROPERTY LINE
PER CONVERSATION MTH MIRAM
MARZIANO - PLANNING DIRECTOR,
TORN OF SUNSET BEACH
TAPER PROPERTY LINE
WALL DOWN FROM 12.00'
TO 11.00'
TOP OF W. W 11.00
NOTE:
RETAINING WALLS TO BE DESIGNED BY OTHERS.
AUGNMENT TO BE FIELD VERIFIED.
30' x 36' EZ FLOW
INRLMAMON BED
(TYP.-SEE DETAIL
DOWIWCU7/CLEANOUT
CONNECTION
(TYP.-SEE DETNL
9LT FEN.
MINUET ITYP.)
LEGEND:
EXISTING CONTOURS: ----2- ---------
PROPOSED CONTOURS: --z26
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION: • FEE
RETAINING WALL ALIGNMENT:
SILT FENCE:
SILT FENCE OUTLET:
DISTURBED AREA
LIMITS (TYPJ
Steven & Ivonne Patterson
2147/1036
Map Cab. X. Pg. 14
FROM TERRACES TO EARTHEN RAMP
TAPER WALL DOIN
FROM lY TO 13
TAPER WALL DOWN
FROM 11' TO 9'
EMSTING TREE
70 BE REMOVED
EXISTING TREE
TO REMAIN
9LT FENCE
DSTURBED AREA
UNITS (TYP.)
SILT FENCE
OUTLET (TYP.)
/ J,
� I
11
I
I I 1 A,
II
II
I
I I 3Y1
,I
0
EXISTING TREES /
TO REMAIN
A ttantic
ITLtrac0wta1
Waterway
�_..........
I
p� ttl�1X1
pOMiSGd IT / gN0.1T Q2ft TI011
.s«i9ccan: �
aewxm�
VSD)
mwwc•tm r�L
• BtA
FZ FLOW DRAINAGE BUNOL
INFIL TRt22tl RED
DISCLAIMER:
THE PROPOSED RETAINING WALL ALONG THE
PROPERTY LINE, SEPARATING THE BURNEY AND
LANGFORD PARCELS HAS THE POTENTIAL TO
CAUSE TEMPORARY AND/OR LONG-TERM EROSION
OF THE GROUND SURFACE ALONG THE TOE OF
THE RETAINING WALL SAID EROSION HAS THE
POTENTIAL TO AFFECT BOTH PROPERTIES.
OWNER IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR INFORMING
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS OF THIS POSSIBLE
IMPACT AND FOR OBTAINING ANY AGREEMENTS
THAT MAY BE PRUDENT AND/OR NECESSARY FOR
SHORT-TERM OR LONG-TERM MAINTENANCE.
MCGILL ASSOCIATES UNDERSTANDS THROUGH
CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE TOWN OF SUNSET
BEACH THAT THE PROPOSED WALL PLACEMENT IS
IN COMPLIANCE WITH ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS,
BUT ASSUMES NO LIABILITY RELATIVE TO THE
CONSTRUCTION AND RELATED MAINTENANCE
ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT ELEMENT.
FINAL DRAWING NOT
ISSUED FOR
CONSTRUCTION
PVL AA WILMINGT , N
y, n II Do 4o w
C,RAPLpC SCALP 1 @7 O 2O 1
Ewa
U�
wz
a
w
Qv�
�z=
UUZR
R
Oaf
V) 0.
C'J
COO`)z3i
Qwa
W c
z�
z
w�
1Y111ii111 ,
Yry -
'/ 1/1/11tWI1Y``
SHEET
C-1 01
REVISION DESCRIPTION

e
OWN
d
lob to l�.o^:_
E)NIWl1AA win. ,,•�`' � ��
LEGEND
EXISTING CONTOURS 26-------`
BEN RAMP
1 SEP 15 22,17 � z
�z
z
Uzi
v zi
..m �z
a•.qr :.-. rr I<Wmq
I z
R.. z !:
T FENCE
TLET (TYP.)
�"d^+ r..ac cute ,uwm
w; a sots vos *w
j
r
roo wrm. cem�. s•
■
III � �aoo'
"
a
Z
1
0,�
r
Q�Z
-
.
a.Q
Q
ti
�IU
uacm (w.ac* ro
aow�aw, / atw�*
EZ FLCW oeamara a aD
NEL2tn , RFr
NOTE:
iRETAINING WALLS TO BE
DESIGNED BY OTHERS.
ALIGNMENT TO BE FIELD
I VERIFIED.
RAWING NOT
FINAL Di E �`� v `
j}
ISSUED FOR
CONSTRUCTION (' lAl/lL ".aTl
PLAN N 4 20
o
jCT
(iRAP3BC 5(:A1.E I Mm = 30 fulT
SHEET
C-1 01