Land Use Plan Executive Summary 1996

TOWN OF BEAUFORT,
NORTH CAROLINA
1996 LAND USE PLAN
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Adopted by the Beaufort Board of Commissioners: August 11, 1997
Certified by the Coastal Resources Commission: September 26, 1997
Holland Consulting Planners, Inc.
Wilmington, North Carolina
The preparation of this document was financed in part through a grant provided by the North
Carolina Coastal Management Program, through funds provided by the Coastal Zone
Management Act of 1972, as amended, which is administered by the Office of Ocean and
Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
No OcAtN,

TOWN OF BEAUFORT,
NORTH CAROLINA
1996 LAND USE PLAN
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Adopted by the Beaufort Board of Commissioners: August 11, 1997
Certified by the Coastal Resources Commission: September 26, 1997
Holland Consulting Planners, Inc.
Wilmington, North Carolina
The preparation of this document was financed in part through a grant provided by the North
Carolina Coastal Management Program, through funds provided by the Coastal Zone
Management Act of 1972, as amended, which is administered by the Office of Ocean and
Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

TOWN OF BEAUFORT, NORTH CAROLINA
FY96 LAND USE PLAN
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The FY96 Land Use Plan Update for the Town of Beaufort was prepared in accordance with requirements
of the North Carolina Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA). Specifically, this executive summary
complies with Subchapter 7B, "Land Use Planning Guidelines," Section .0202 "Executive Summary,"
of the North Carolina Administrative Code, as amended, September 28, 1995.
Subchapter 7B, Section .0202, defines the following intent of executive summaries:
"An executive summary shall be prepared and included as an introduction to the Land
Use Plan, or as a separate document. In either case, it shall be suitable for distribution
throughout the planning area. The executive summary shall contain a summary of the
land use issues which will affect the community during the planning period, the policies
which the local government has selected to address those issues, and a land classification
map. An executive summary is not required for a Sketch Land Use Plan."
It should be noted that the policy section of the land use plan contained in this executive summary is the
most important part of the document. State and federal agencies will use the local land use policies in
making project consistency, funding, and permit decisions.
SECTION I: ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
A. POPULATION AND HOUSING
Population
Carteret County is one of the state's fastest growing counties. Based on detailed demographic estimates
provided by the State Data Center for counties and municipalities through 1994, Carteret County was the
sixth fastest growing CAMA-regulated county and was 24th in the entire state.
Carteret County's rate of growth from 1970 to 1980 was twice the growth rate of the 1960s. Since 1980,
population growth, although extremely high, has occurred at a continually decreasing rate. The N.C.
I State Data Center has forecast this trend to continue through the year 2003. A large percentage of the
growth in Carteret County from 1970-1994 has occurred in the incorporated beach communities and in
areas near the extraterritorial jurisdiction of existing municipalities. The Town of Beaufort, not including
unincorporated areas, had an increase in population from 1970 to 1994 of 629 permanent residents for
a 18.7% increase. Unincorporated areas grew at a rate of 67.1% for the same period. The town's
current estimate of the permanent population residing within the incorporated area of Beaufort is 4,013
persons. Since 1994, a large percentage of the town's population growth has resulted from annexation
having taken place in July, 1995. In addition, the town has a 1995 peak seasonal population of
approximately 2,024. This results in a total peak population of 6,037.
The population growth of Carteret County and the Town of Beaufort is the result of many factors
including: a national trend of migration to non -metropolitan areas; expansion of military facilities and
activities; industrial development; tourism; and the emergence of the area as a retirement center.

2. Housing Characteristics
From 1970-1990, the town's total housing supply increased from 1,269 units to 2,085 units. This
amounts to a net gain of 816 units and a 64.3 % increase over the twenty-year period. The number of
owner -occupied housing units decreased and the number of renter -occupied units increased from 1970-
1990. In 1970, 76.8 % of the occupied housing units were owner -occupied. This figure dropped to only
55.7 % in 1990.
The number of seasonal units in 1990 is 3.6 times higher than it was in 1970. The majority of this
growth occurred from 1980-1990, with the addition of 139 seasonal housing units. This table, in general,
illustrates a trend away from the traditional owner -occupied housing towards a'rented and seasonal stock
of housing in Beaufort.
In 1990, there were 2,085 housing units in Beaufort. Only 3.2% of Beaufort's housing stock was less
than one year old and 59.5 % was greater than twenty years old. The maturity and condition of housing
reflects Beaufort's strong historical preservation efforts, which have maintained housing and increased
the average age of housing within the town. It may also be noted that single family, detached housing
dominates the market at 57.70%.
3. Summary
The following provides a summary of significant demographic and housing findings:
-- Between 1980-1990, Carteret County experienced a 27.94% population growth; 47.29%
in incorporated areas and 18.45 % in the unincorporated areas.
— Beaufort experienced a slight drop in permanent population from 3,826 in 1980 to 3,808
in 1990. During the same time period, the total number of seasonal housing units
increased from 97 to 236.
-- In 1995, the town can expect a peak seasonal population of 2,024. This figure does not
include "day visitors".
— The average age of the town's population has continued to mature and in 1990 36.2 % of
the population was over fifty years of age.
-- The school -aged population has continued to decrease from a high in 1970 of 27.2 % to
a low in 1990 of only 17.0% of the total population.
— Since 1970, Beaufort's percentage of non -white population has decreased from 31 % to
26% and the female population has increased to make up a total of 55% of the
population.
— Beaufort's housing stock is primarily composed of year-round dwelling units, but there
has been a shift from a vast majority of the units being owner -occupied to 44% being
renter -occupied.
From 1970 to 1990, the town's total housing supply increased by 64.3 %.
In 1990, 77.75 % of the housing stock was over twenty years old.

B. ECONOMY
Prior to 1990, the Town of Beaufort maintained a per capita income above that of the state and Carteret
County. In 1990, Beaufort's per capita income was surpassed by the state by $1,500 dollars and the
county by $1,842 dollars. This may be due in part to the substantial decrease in the educational service
sector and a decline in the commercial fishing industry.
In 1980, the commercial fishing industry ranked fourth in total employment behind educational services,
retail trade, and public administration. In 1990, the commercial fishing industry dropped to a rank of
j 13th ahead of only business and repair services and communications, other public utilities. The
educational services sector was ranked 1st in total employment in 1980 and dropped to fifth in 1990.
According to the Carteret County School Board this decrease in the Town of Beaufort's educational
services sector was not the result of a loss of jobs. In fact, Census data for Carteret County as a whole
indicates an increase of 34 % for the educational services sector of employment between 1980-1990. The
only explanation for the decrease experienced in the Town of Beaufort is that a large number of those
employed in the educational services sector chose to move outside the town limits of Beaufort between
i_ 1980 and 1990.
The 1990 Town of Beaufort Land Use Plan mentioned that the commercial fishing industry had a
significant "multiplier effect" in the local economy. This means that other sectors of employment such
as retail trade, wholesale trade, and manufacturing benefitted from a healthy commercial fishing industry.
Since Beaufort once relied heavily on this industry, it is possible that its demise has had a negative impact
throughout the entire economy and may have contributed to the decrease in per capita income relative
to the state and county.
Several occupations experienced increases in percentage of total employment from 1980-1990. The
construction sector increased 3.4%, retail trade 6.3%, health services 5.9%, manufacturing nondurable
goods 1.5%, and transportation 1.5%. In 1990, the top five occupations in terms of percent of the
workforce were retailed trade, public administration, health services, manufacturing durable goods, and
educational services.
A combination of the above shifts in the various occupational sectors may help to explain the lower than
average per capita income Beaufort experienced in 1990. Between 1980 and 1990, the number of middle
class individuals decreased while the number of people with an income below 75% of poverty level and
an income 200% of poverty level and above increased.
The town's economy is enhanced by the strength of Carteret County's industrial development. Since
1970, manufacturing has experienced substantial growth both in terms of employment and earnings. In
1989, there were 62 manufacturing facilities located in Carteret County, including the industries located
within the Town of Beaufort. With the exception of the Creative Outlet, Inc., all of the above industries
are located outside of Beaufort corporate limits but within the extraterritorial jurisdiction. Between 1990
and 1995, the number of employees at the above industries remained stable. Although a sound industrial
base is very important to the economy of Beaufort, its primary driving force is tourism and recreation.
The area's extensive shoreline resources make it a primary vacation area for the entire east coast of the
country. While the greatest tourist impact on the local economy occurs from May to September,
visitation figures maintained for the county by the Carteret County Economic Development Council
indicate a substantial year-round economic impact from both day and overnight visitors. Restaurants and
motels, sport fishing, retail trade, services, construction, real estate, and finance industries all benefit
from overnight and day visitors.

In summary, the Beaufort economy appears to be going through a period of transition in terms of the
occupational sectors and income levels. In part, the principal agents in the economy were retail trade and
health services. In the last ten years, there has been a shift away from commercial fishing and
educational services and toward a market dominated by retail trade and tourism.
C. EXISTING LAND USE
1. Introduction
The Town of Beaufort has managed to maintain a blend of the old and the new. New growth has
occurred while historically significant areas and individual properties have been protected. During the
1990-1995 period, new development has slowed from that which was experienced during the late 1980's.
The town's focal point continues to be the Beaufort waterfront and central business district.
This section provides a comparison of the 1990 and 1995 land uses. In general, there were no major land
use changes from 1990 to 1995. The greatest acreage change occurred in the single-family residential
category. The acreages and dwelling unit count summaries for both the city's incorporated area and the
extraterritorial jurisdiction are provided in Tables 1 and 2.
Table 1
Town of Beaufort, NC
Existing Land Use Within Town Limits
Land Use
Density
Acres Percent of Total Units (Units/Acre)
1990
1995
1990
1995
1990
1995
Ill
[21
Ill
[21
Ill
[21
Single-family
308.6
340.5
39.0
40.5
1,358
1,428
Mobile Home
24.5
31.4
3.0
3.7
Ill
I l l
Multi -Family
73.4
77.0
9.0
9.2
669
402
Total Residential
406.5
448.9
51.0
53.4
2,138
1,941
Commercial
91.8
134.5
12.0
16.0
Industrial
12.8
15.1
2.0
1.8
Public and Institutional
67.6
78.6
8.0
9.4
Utilities
4.4
4.4
1.0
0.5
Agricultural,
Forested and Vacant
200.4
158.4
26.0
18.9
Totals
783.5
839.9
100.0
100.0
[11 Source: 1990 Beaufort Land Use Plan.
[21 Source: Field Survey, Holland Consulting Planners, November, 1995.
1990 1995
Ill [21
4.40 4.20
4.53 3.53
9.11 5.22
5.26 4.32

Table 2
Town of Beaufort, NC
Existing Land Use - Total Beaufort Planning Area
Density
Land Use
Acres
Percent of Total
Units
(Units/Acre)
-
1990 1995
1990
1995
1990
1995
1990 1995
Ill [2]
Ill
(21
Ill
[21
Ill [2]
Single-family
537.1 661.5
17.7
20.3
1,647
1,761
3.1 2.7
(includes mobile homes
- on individual lots)
Mobile Home
29.6 33.1
1.0
1.0
151
125
5.1 3.8
Multiple Family
73.4 77.0
2.4
2.4
669
402
9.1 5.2
! Total Residential
L
640.1 771.6
21.1
23.7
2,467
2,288
3.9 3.0
Commercial
105.8 153.4
3.5
4.7
Industrial
114.8 114.0
3.7
3.5
Public and Institutional
166.2 211.7
5.5
6.5
Airport
403.6 403.6
13.2
12.4
Utilities
8.2 8.2
0.3
0.3
Agricultural,
` Forested and Vacant
1,603.3 1,596.5
52.7
48.9
Totals
3,042.0 3,259.0
100.0
100.0
[11 Source: 1990 Beaufort
Land Use Plan.
[2] Source: Field Survey,
Holland Consulting Planners, November, 1995.
2. Annexations
From 1990 to 1995, 8 minor annexations occurred totaling 56.38 acres in area. All of the annexed areas
except for the Duke Marine Laboratories, located on Piver's Island, and a mobile home park were vacant.
The vacant areas included approximately 43 acres. In addition, the town's extraterritorial jurisdiction was
extended to the north along both sides of U.S. 70. The additional ETJ included approximately 217 acres.
3. Basinwide Water Quality Management
The Water Quality Section of the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (NCDEM) has
initiated a basinwide approach to state water quality management. The overall goal of basinwide
management is to develop consistent and effective long range water quality management strategies that
protect the quality and intended uses of North Carolina's surface waters while accommodating population
increases and economic growth.
The State of North Carolina has been divided into seventeen major river basins. For each river basin,
water quality problems are identified and appropriate management strategies developed. The plan features
5

basinwide permitting of pollution discharges, integration of existing point and nonpoint source control
programs, and preparation of a basinwide management plan report.
The purpose of the basinwide management plan is to communicate to policy makers, the regulated
community, and the general public, the state's rationale, approaches, and long-term strategies for each
basin. Preparation of a basinwide management plan is a five year process. In general, this process
involves the following five major phases of development:
— Collecting pertinent water quality and related information,
— Analyzing the information and targeting problem areas,
— Development management strategies,
— Circulating a draft plan for public review and comment, and
— Finalizing the plan.
Beaufort is located in the White Oak basin. The White Oak basinwide management plan was submitted
for staff review in January, 1996, and received Environmental Management Commission approval in
January, 1997.
The USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service has identified 24 watersheds within the White Oak
Basin. Water concerns within North Carolina are now addressed by the Division of Water Quality. Each
watershed has been assigned a fourteen -digit code for the purpose of identification. The town's planning
jurisdiction is almost equally divided between two watersheds. Watershed 03020106040010 includes the
eastern portion of town and watershed 03020106030070 includes the western portion of town. The
primary waterbodies for these watersheds include the North and Newport Rivers. The watershed
boundary is delineated on Map 3. Table 16 provides a summary of base and demographic information
for each watershed.
Issues which directly affect Beaufort include:
Regulation of urban stormwater runoff
— Control of agricultural runoff
Protection of groundwater quality
- Preservation of water quality in Taylor's Creek and around Carrot Island.
4. Summary: Town of Beaufort Existing Land Use Patterns
The Town of Beaufort has an active planning process. In 1990, the town's Board of Commissioners
served as the Board of Adjustment. The 1990 Land Use Plan recommended that this be eliminated and
a separate Board of Adjustment established. Subsequent to 1990, a separate board of adjustment was
established. The Town of Beaufort Board of Adjustment currently serves both Board of Adjustment and
Planning Board functions. This board has been instrumental in the preparation of this land use plan and
the definition of key land use issues which should be addressed in the future planning and policy
statements section of this plan. In addition, input from the public at large was solicited throughout the
process of updating this plan. The following summarizes the key land use issues which should be
addressed:
— The effects of sea level rise on the Town of Beaufort.
-- Construction of a new bridge on U.S. 70 at Beaufort Channel to alleviate disruptions to
east -west traffic.

— Continued expansion of the Michael J. Smith Airport.
Extension of water and sewer utilities into the town's extraterritorial jurisdiction.
Coordination of the development/improvement of the Beaufort sewage treatment system
with Carteret County's plans and policies for the development of sewage treatment
system(s).
The impact of offshore drilling on the Town of Beaufort.
— Protection of the Rachel Carson National Estuarine Sanctuary which includes Carrot
Island, Town Marsh, and Bird Shoal.
-- — Control of strip commercialization along U.S. 70 north.
-- Continued protection of the town's historic district.
-- Implementation of redevelopment/revitalizationprojects to eliminate substandard housing.
-- Establishment of a comprehensive annexation plan.
Development of service industry to support tourism.
— Protection of Areas of Environmental Concern.
i
— Establishment of a Growth Management Plan.
- Urban stormwater and agricultural runoff are detrimental to water quality within
Beaufort's planning jurisdiction.
SECTION II: PROJECTED LAND DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS
A. PROJECTED DEMAND FOR DEVELOPMENT
1. Demographic Trends
Beaufort's population will comprise a slightly smaller percentage of the county's total population by 2005.
In 1990, Beaufort contained approximately 7.2% of the county population. This percentage is expected
to decrease slightly to 6.6% by 2005. However, Beaufort will continue to be the second largest town
within Carteret County, ranking behind Morehead City.
Most of the land area within the town has been developed. The town's population cannot grow
appreciably without annexation. The extension of town utilities into the extraterritorial jurisdiction area
_ will both encourage and support annexation actions. Based on an average household size of 2.4,
approximately 930 people resided within the town's extraterritorial area in 1995. This should increase
to over 1,500 by 2005. Approximately one-third to one-half of this population is located in areas which
could easily be annexed. Thus, annexation could result in an additional 15 to 20% growth of the 1995
population by 2005.
7

Despite the expected decrease in annual growth rate, the population growth rate in Carteret County will
still be considerably higher than the North Carolina rate over the next ten years. From 1995-2005, the
state population is estimated to show a 13.0% increase. The Carteret County population is anticipated
to grow 17.9% over the same period.
From 1993-2003, the county's municipalities should grow approximately 6.4% faster than its
unincorporated areas. The beach communities will continue to display high growth rates as their
recreational potential continues to attract retirees, younger professionals and entrepreneurs. Morehead
City is also anticipated to experience appreciable population growth over the planning period as it
develops as a commercial center for the nearby waterfront recreational communities.
2. Commercial and Industrial Land Use
During the period 1990 to 1995, commercial and industrial development primarily occurred in the
extraterritorial jurisdiction. Growth within the incorporated area was limited because of a lack of vacant
land and •availability of areas zoned for commercial and industrial development. This pattern of
development is expected to continue during the planning period, 1995 to 2000. Any major commercial
development within the corporate limits will have to occur through the redevelopment of areas presently
developed.
Within the extraterritorial area, development is expected to focus on the U.S. 70 corridor and around the
Michael J. Smith Airport. During the past two years, the U.S. 70 corridor has experienced a number
of rezoning actions to reclassify parcels from residential to commercial categories. Pressure may be
expected to continue through the planning period for commercial rezonings. Caution should be taken to
control strip commercialization and the traffic and service problems associated with such development.
The majority of the industrially zoned property within the town's extraterritorial jurisdiction is the
Warehouse -Industrial zoned property located at and adjacent to the airport. Other warehouse industrial
areas are located off Mulberry Street east of the town limits.
Off -shore drilling could have a major impact on development within Beaufort. If drilling does occur, it
is not known in what location oil or gas would be brought ashore. If oil or gas is brought ashore outside
of Carteret County, the on -shore development of facilities to support drilling operations could be minimal.
The town should carefully monitor drilling plans and be prepared with regard to on -shore impacts when
specific development plans are known.
3. Housing Trends
Since 1990, there has been no significant residential subdivision development within Beaufort's planning
jurisdiction. In 1995, approximately 75 vacant residential subdivision lots existed. Residential building
permits were issued at an average rate of 17 per year from 1991 to 1994. At this rate of construction,
it would only require 4.5 years to build -out the vacant lots. Thus, there is a limited inventory of
subdivided residential lots. Further residential subdivision development may be expected during the
planning period in the ETJ.
Approximately 1,438 acres of agricultural, forested, and vacant land exists within the Beaufort
extraterritorial planning jurisdiction. Most of that land is zoned for R-20 residential development. At
an average density of two dwelling units per acre, a total of over 2,875 dwelling units could be
constructed. At the current growth rate, full development of residentially zoned property within the
extraterritorial area would require over 150 years, if all residential development occurs in the ETJ.

Within the town's corporate limits, preservation of historically significant residential areas will continue
to be emphasized. Only moderate residential development will occur within the existing corporate limits
because of limited vacant land. The vacant residentially zoned land within the town is primarily zoned
R-15 with some R-10 and R-8 zoning (R-15/15,000 sq. ft. lots, R-10/10,000 sq. ft. lots, R-8/8,000 sq.
8. lots). Based on an average density of three dwelling units per acre and approximately 75 acres of
vacant residentially zoned property, approximately 225 additional single-family dwellings may be
constructed within the town limits. At current growth rates, total build -out of all vacant single-family
- zoned property would require approximately 25 years.
4. Public Land Use
No major changes to public land use are expected during the planning period with the exception of the
Randolph Johnson Park. Efforts to preserve, protect, and promote the town's waterfront areas will
continue. This will require commitment to the annual care and maintenance of public areas including
parking, parks, sidewalks, and other facilities.
S. Project Public Facilities Needs/Availability
The Town of Beaufort water supply plan is based on a total service area population of 4,300 by 2020.
This plan forecasts a Beaufort population of 4,600 by 2005. If the forecast proves correct, the peak day
usage should be just below the town's 12-hour combined water yield by 2005. If the town needs to
provide additional water services, the following two economically feasible options are available.
1) The Town of Beaufort could extend lines some 3.8 miles and connect with the North
River Water System. This system was developed for a much greater demand than is
presently being used by the system. The system is owned by Carteret County and
presently operated by the Town of Beaufort.
2) The Town of Beaufort could construct an additional well close to treatment site, #3. This
` site was designed and constructed to accommodate flows from an additional well. The
Castle Hayne Aquifer in this area yields from 500 to 800 GPM. Using 500 GPM would
raise the safe yield to 1.66 MGD.
A comparison of water usage to wastewater discharge information reveals significant amounts of inflow
and infiltration. Although inflow and infiltration have already been significantly reduced, the town should
- continue to reduce this problem. Wastewater capacity will greatly depend on the town's ability to locate
and reduce these sources.
Two factors will greatly influence continued discharge into Taylor's Creek. First, the Basin Wide
Management Plan being implemented by DEM provides total basin loading which will dictate effluent
limits. Second, is the movement by the Carteret County municipalities to seriously address land
application of treated effluent.
The Town of Beaufort has been and will continue to be an active participant towards a regional approach,
considering all alternatives to provide a more environmentally sound and economically feasible method
of wastewater disposal.
0

6. Airport Development
The Michael J. Smith Airport Master Plan proposed significant improvement of the airport. Ultimately,
runway 8-26 will be lengthened to 5,500 linear feet. This will require relocation of a portion of NC 101.
Lengthening the runway will significantly improve the airport's ability to accommodate business/corporate
jet aircraft. The runway lengthening is not expected to occur until after the planning period. However,
planning for the extension will begin during the planning period.
7. Areas Likely to Experience Major Land Use Changes
No major changes in the existing patterns of land use are expected to occur throughout the planning
period. The town's planning and zoning program should continue to protect existing land uses and to
minimize the development of conflicting land uses. Close .attention should be paid to commercial
development along the Cedar Street-U.S. 70 corridor. This commercial development should be
coordinated with traffic planning to reduce congestion. Also, care must be taken to avoid conflicts with
adjacent residential development. Ultimately, relocation of the Beaufort Channel bridge and the
associated re-routing of U.S. 70 will alleviate much of this problem. However, this relocation is not
expected during the planning period. As stated earlier, residential development should continue as the
primary development within the extraterritorial area.
A long-range concern will continue to be the issue of sea level rise. During the next 30-year period,
approximately 20 to 30 percent of the land area within the town's jurisdiction could be inundated by
rising sea water. The main area of Beaufort located south of Town Creek and Turner Creek would
become an island, being isolated from the mainland. Also, the existing waterfront areas along Taylor's
Creek would be lost. The town should begin planning for possible sea level rise. Local ordinances
should be reviewed for determination of changes which may need to be made to protect developments
from rising sea level and to accommodate the movement of structures to higher ground.
B. REDEVELOPMENT ISSUES
The Town of Beaufort has been extremely successful with its redevelopment efforts. Beaufort's
waterfront area along Taylor's Creek serves as an example to other coastal North Carolina communities.
The town has also successfully preserved its historic district. In 1970, Beaufort implemented a HUD -
funded community development rehabilitation project. Over 20 dwelling units received assistance.
Future redevelopment efforts should focus on the following:
Continued protection of both the historic district and the waterfront area.
-- Redevelopment/visual improvement of the U.S. 70 - Cedar Street. area.
Removal of substandard dwelling units through enforcement of the town's minimum
housing code.
During FY1996, it was expected that the town's initial Community Development Block Grant housing
rehabilitation project would be funded. This project will make a significant reduction in the town's
substandard housing. However, additional housing improvement projects should be pursued during the
planning period.
10

SECTION III: LAND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
The CAMA regulations require the establishment of a specific land classification system to support the
local govermnent's policy statements. This system should reflect developing land use patterns within a
- community. The CAMA 15A NCAC 7B regulations state:
"The land classification system provides a framework to be used by local
' governments to identify the future use of all lands. The designation of
land classes allows the local government to illustrate their policy
statements as to where and to what density they want growth to occur,
and where they want to conserve natural and cultural resources by
guiding growth."
i- The 15A NCAC 7H requirements provide for the following land classifications: developed, urban
transition, limited transition, community, rural, rural with services, and conservation. In applying these
classifications, Beaufort should carefully consider where and when various types of development should
be encouraged. Additionally, the areas of environmental concern requiring protection should be identified
and mapped. Each applicable land classification must be represented on a land classification map.
The following land classifications will apply in Beaufort's jurisdiction:
DEVELOPED: Areas included in the developed land classification are currently urban in character, with
no or minimal undeveloped land remaining. Municipal types of services are in place or are expected to
be provided within the next five to ten years. Land uses include residential, commercial, industrial, and
other urban land uses at high or moderate densities. With the exception of R-5 Cluster Development,
residential densities are allowed in excess of an average of three dwelling units per acre, with a minimum
plot size of one acre and a minimum single-family residential lot size of 5,000 square feet. Cluster
developments shall not exceed eight units per acre, with a minimum lot size of one acre.
URBAN TRANSITION: Areas included in the urban transition classification are presently being
developed for urban purposes, or will be developed in the next five to ten years. These areas should
eventually require complete urban services within the planning period. The urban transition areas include
mixed land uses such as residential, commercial, institutional, industrial, and other uses approaching high
to moderate densities. Residential densities are allowed in excess of an average of three dwelling units
per acre, with a minimum single-family residential lot size of 10,000 square feet.
LIMITED TRANSITION: Areas included in the limited transition classification are areas which will
experience increasing development during the next five to ten years. Some municipal type services will
be required. The limited transition classification is intended for predominantly residential use. However,
some commercial, office, and institutional uses may be allowed. Residential densities at an average of
three units per acre or less are acceptable. Densities within some areas of the limited transition
classification may be higher. The minimum lot size shall be 10,000 square feet. Clustering or
development associated with planned unit developments are acceptable in this classification.
RURAL WITH SERVICES: Areas included within the rural with services classification are developed
at low density. Land uses include residential use where limited water services are provided in order to
avert existing or projected health problems. Lot sizes will be large and the provision of services will not
disrupt the primary rural character of the landscape. The provision of services should not be designed
to serve as a catalyst for development.
11

CONSERVATION: The following areas of environmental concern are included in the conservation
classification:
Coastal Wetlands: This classification includes all areas of coastal wetlands which include any salt
marsh or other [Harsh subject to regular or occasional flooding by tides, including wind tides.
However, tidal flooding is understood not to include hurricane or tropical storm tides. Uses will
be allowed within the coastal wetlands areas that are consistent with the 15A NCAC 7H use
standards. In addition, the town supports possible expansion of the Michael J. Smith Airport into
coastal wetlands areas. All specific coastal wetlands locations must be determined through on -site
investigation and analysis.
Estuarine Shorelines: All areas lying 0-75 feet landward of the mean high water level of
estuarine waters not designated as Outstanding Resource Waters are classified as estuarine
shorelines. Because of map size and scale, these areas cannot be accurately mapped. Precise
locations must be determined in the field. Except for policies addressing industrial impacts on
fragile areas; development of sound and estuarine islands; and residential, commercial and
industrial development impacts on resources, uses will be allowed within the estuarine shoreline
areas that are consistent with the 15A NCAC 7H use standards.
Estuarine and Public Trust Waters: All public trust areas and estuarine waters are included in
this classification. All waters of Carteret County are classified as estuarine waters as described
by 15A NCAC 7H.0206 or public trust areas as described by 15A NCAC 7H.0207. Uses
consistent with 15A NCAC 7H.0207 will be allowed in estuarine waters and public trust areas.
The Conservation policies are not more restrictive than the use standards included in
15A NCAC 7H.
The land classifications are delineated on Map 1. The land classification map indicates a continuation
of existing development patterns. Some expansion of the developed classification has occurred since 1985
to the east of town along Taylor's Creek and north of the airport. In addition, the areas classified as rural
occupy much less area than indicated in the 1985 Land Use Plan.
12

LEGEND
DEV
DEVELOPED
URBAN TRAN
URBAN TRANSITION
LIMITED TRAN
LIMITED TRANSITION
RURAL WITH SERVICES
RURAL WITH SERVICES
CON
CONSERVATION
CITY LIMIT BOUNDARY
EXTRA-TERRRORIAL
MAP 1
BEAUFORT, N.C.
LAND CLASSIFICATION MAP
Scale
NOTES:
I. ALL AREAS LYING 0-75' LANDWARD OF THE
MEAN HIGH WATER LEVEL OF ESTUARINE
WATERS ARE ESTUARINE SHORELINE AREAS
AND CLASSIFIED AS CONSERVATION LANDS.
BECAUSE OF MAP SCALE. THESE AREAS
CANNOT BE ACCURATELY MAPPED. PRECISE
LOCATIONS MUST BE DETERMINED IN THE
FIELD.
2. ALL WATERS IN BEAl1PORT'S PLANNING
JURISDICTION ARE CLASSIFIED AS ESTUARINE
WATERS AS DESCRIBED BY 15 NCAC 7H.0206,
OR PUBLIC TRUST AREAS AS DESCRIBED BY 15
NCAC 7H.0207. ALL DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE
CONSISTANT WITH THE USE STANDARDS
CONTAINED IN 15 NCAC 7RO206 AND .0207.
The preparation of this map was financed In pat
through a grant provided by the North Carolina
Coastal Management Program, through funds
rovlded by the Coastal Zone Management Act ofPB72, as amended, which is administered by the
Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource
Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration.
13

SECTION IV: INTRODUCTION TO POLICY STATEMENTS
This plan identifies issues dealing with growth, development, and the environment. This section of the
plan is intended to provide policies which will address growth management and protection of the
environment. The policies should be based on the objectives of the citizens of Beaufort and satisfy the
objectives of the Coastal Resources Commission. The policies should not restrict healthy,
environmentally sound development essential to Beaufort's future well being.
It should be emphasized that the policy statements are extremely important and have a day-to-day impact
on businesses and individual citizens within Beaufort's planning jurisdiction. The statements have an
impact in three areas:
— CAMA minor and major permitting as required by N.C.G.S. 113A-118 prior to
undertaking any development in any area of environmental concern.
— Establishment of local planning policy.
Review of proposed projects requiring state or federal assistance or approval to determine
consistency with local policies.
For the issuance of CAMA permits within areas of environmental concern, the state's minimum
acceptable use standards are defined by 15A NCAC 7H. A local unit of government must adopt policies
which are, at a minimum, equal to and consistent with the state's minimum use standards. Beaufort may
adopt policies which are more stringent than the minimum use standards. For example, the state
standards allow marinas to be located within primary nursery areas if some minimum conditions are met.
Beaufort could adopt a policy stating that marinas will not be permitted within primary nursery areas
(This is only an example, not a recommendation). If this were to occur, a CAMA permit for marina
construction in a primary nursery area would not be issued. IT IS CRUCIAL THAT A LOCAL
GOVERNMENT UNDERSTAND THE IMPACT OF ITS POLICIES WITHIN AREAS OF
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN.
The second area of land use plan application is that of establishing policies to guide the jurisdiction's local
planning. This may apply both within areas of environmental concern where CAMA regulations apply
and in non-CAMA regulated areas of the county. Under North Carolina legislation, land use plans are
not regulatory controls. Non-CAMA related recommendations must be implemented with local land use
ordinances such as zoning or subdivision ordinances. If this plan recommends that the average residential
density should be three dwelling units per acre within a particular area, then that density must be achieved
through local zoning ordinance or other regulatory control. (This should not be confused with the
interaction of the land use plan with the CAMA regulations and 15A NCAC 7H use standards.)
The final area of application is that of "Consistency Review." Proposals and applications for state and
federal assistance or requests for agency approval of projects are normally reviewed against a
jurisdiction's land use plan to determine if the project is consistent with local policies. Inconsistencies
of a project with local policies could serve as grounds for denial or revision of a project. For example,
an individual or agency may request state or federal funding to construct a 30-unit low -to -moderate
income housing project. If the proposed location of the project is within an area in which this land use
plan states that the residential density should not exceed two dwelling units per acre, the project may be
judged to be inconsistent with the local land use plan.
14

The Coastal Resources Commission requires all governments to specify stated development policies under
each one of five broad topics as specified by 15A NCAC 7B. These topics include:
Resource Protection
— Resource Production and Management
— Economic and Community Development
— Continuing Public Participation
— Storm Hazard Mitigation, Post -Disaster Recovery, and Evacuation Plans
During 1995 and 1996, the NCAC 7B CAMA planning guidelines were revised. The revised guidelines
included new requirements for the development of policy statements. These changes included the
following policy statement additions:
— A general vision policy statement describing the type of community that
the local government would like to become within the next ten years.
— A basic statement as to the community attitude toward resource
protection.
— A policy addressing the protection of wetlands identified as being of the
highest functional significance on maps supplied by the Division of
Coastal Management.
— A policy addressing moorings and mooring fields.
- A policy addressing water quality problems and management measures
designed to reduce or eliminate local sources of surface water quality
problems.
— A statement as to the community attitude toward resource production and
management.
A policy addressing commitment to state and federal programs, including
housing rehabilitation, community development block grants, housing for
low and moderate income level citizens, water and sewer installation, and
rural water systems.
A policy addressing assistance to interstate waterways.
Based on the analysis of existing conditions and trends, suggestions from the town's citizens, and
substantial input and guidance from the Town of Beaufort Board of Adjustment, the policies in the
following sections have been formulated to provide a guide for regulating development within Beaufort's
planning jurisdiction. Policies which were considered, but not adopted, are provided in Appendix I.
A. VISION STATEMENT
Beaufort values its rich maritime history and the picturesque landscape which this history provides.
These historical assets and the shoreline setting are the cornerstones of an important tourist industry. As
the town develops, these assets will be maintained and protected. At the same time, the town will pursue
15

development within its extraterritorial jurisdiction which is consistent with the 15A NCAC 7H minimum
use standards for AEC's. It is the town's intention to protect its valuable maritime resources. Industrial
development will be encouraged within the town's extraterritorial jurisdiction outside of the AFC's.
Finally, it is a priority of the town to carefully control growth and development which is expected to
occur along the relocated U.S. 70 highway corridor which will be associated with the construction of a
new bridge across the Beaufort channel.
B. RESOURCE PROTECTION POLICY STATEMENTS
Community Attitude on Resource Protection
Beaufort has demonstrated a concern with resource protection. This concern has been displayed through
_ the adoption of local ordinances and support for the 15A NCAC 7H minimum use standards. Emphasis
has been placed on restriction of floating structures and preservation of estuarine shoreline areas, the
historic district, the town's central waterfront area, and Carrot Island.
Physical Limitations
Soils
To mitigate septic tank problems and other restrictions on development posed by soil limitations, Beaufort
will:
(a) Enforce, through the development and zoning permit process, all current regulations of the N.C.
State Building Code and the N.C. Division of Health Services relating to building construction
and septic tank installation/replacement in areas with soils restrictions.
(b) Coordinate all development activity with appropriate Carteret County and state regulatory
personnel, and in particular, with the Carteret County Sanitarian.
(c) Cooperate with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in the regulation/enforcement of the 404
wetlands permit process. With the exception of soils policy (d), the Town of Beaufort will accept
the permitting standards of the Corps of Engineers, and does not adopt any policies which exceed
the federal standards.
(d) Beaufort opposes the installation of package treatment plants and septic tanks or discharge of
waste in any areas classified as coastal wetlands, freshwater wetlands (404), or natural heritage
areas. This policy applies only to areas shown as freshwater wetlands, coastal wetlands, and
natural heritage areas on Map 1, Land Classification Map.
Flood Hazard Areas
(a) Beaufort will continue to coordinate all development within the special flood hazard area with the
town's Inspections Department, North Carolina Division of Coastal Management, FEMA, and
the U.S. Corps of Engineers.
(b) Beaufort will continue to enforce its existing zoning and flood damage prevention ordinances and
follow the storm hazard mitigation plan contained herein.
16

Groundwater/Protection of Potable Water Supplies
Beaufort's policy is to conserve its surficial groundwater resources by supporting CAMA and N.C.
Division of Water Quality stormwater run-off regulations, and by coordinating local development
activities involving chemical storage or underground storage tank installation/abandonment with Carteret
County Emergency Management personnel and the Groundwater Section of the North Carolina Division
of Water Quality. The Town of Beaufort Building Inspections Department will coordinate building
inspections with state and federal regulations governing underground storage tanks and will endeavor to
advise building permit applicants of those regulations.
Manmade Hazards
(a) Beaufort will support the technical requirements and state program approval for underground
storage tanks (40 CFR, Parts 280 and 281), and any subsequent state regulations concerning
underground storage tanks adopted during the planning period.
(b) Beaufort encourages the establishment of appropriate environmental and operational safeguards
for the expansion of fuel storage tank facilities on Radio Island. All expansions must be in
compliance with applicable state, federal, and local regulations. Beaufort opposes the storage of
any non -fuel hazardous materials on Radio Island.
(c) Agricultural quarantine and decontamination facilities should not be established on Radio Island
by the U.S. Navy or other agent of the federal government unless a full Environmental Impact
Statement with a finding of no significant effect on the environment has been prepared and proper
environmental safeguards are implemented. The Environmental Impact Statement should include
mitigation measures for the loss of any public beach access.
(d) Beaufort will support development of sound attenuation zoning requirements for the areas affected
by the aircraft operating patterns at the Michael J. Smith Field. The zoning for Michael J. Smith
Field should be coordinated with Carteret County and Morehead City.
(e) The Town of Beaufort requests notification, including full and complete disclosure of all plans,
for either public or private development of Radio Island. In addition, Beaufort requests that
Carteret County notify the town in writing of all requests for special use permits on Radio Island.
(f) With the exception of fuel storage tanks used for retail and wholesale sales, Beaufort opposes the
bulk storage of fuel or other man-made hazardous materials within any areas not zoned for
industrial usage.
(g) The Town of Beaufort adopts the following policies concerning operation, development, and
expansion of the Michael J. Smith Airport:
— Any expansion plans for the airport must be consistent with the town's Zoning Ordinance
and Land Use Plan.
Beaufort does not object to increased air traffic which will not result in increased noise
impact(s) on properties located within airport flight patterns.
— The Town of Beaufort supports any runway extensions or other airport expansions which
will not cause any changes to N.C. 101 which will result in increased traffic in the
17

vicinity of the Beaufort Middle School. The town's preference for the extension of
Runway 8-26 is to have the runway extended to the northeast which would require the
relocation of a portion of NC 101.
— Beaufort requests notification of, and the right to review and comment on, all plans being
prepared or amended for the airport.
-- Specifically, the following airport development projects are supported:
FY1996 Install visual approach aids on runways 8-26 and 3-21, construct
hangar area access taxiway.
FY1998 Conduct environmental assessment for extension of runway 8-26
- to 5,500 feet.
,` I FY1999 Relocate and expand airfield electrical vault.
(h) Expansions of Aviation Military Restricted Areas or Military Operations Areas in eastern North
Carolina must be consistent with civil aviation regulations, must comply with other applicable
state and federal regulations, and must be supported by environmental impact statements
addressing the cumulative impact of such airspace uses.
(i) The town opposes any low level military training flights that are not in compliance with the
minimum safe altitudes for aircraft operation as described in the Federal Aviation Regulations,
Part 91.
Stormwater Runoff
(a) Beaufort recognizes the value of water quality maintenance to the protection of fragile areas and
to the provision of clean water for recreational purposes. The town will support existing state
regulations relating to stormwater runoff resulting from development (Stormwater Disposal Policy
15 NCAC 2H.001-.1003) through enforcement of the town's subdivision ordinance.
(b) Beaufort supports control of agricultural runoff through implementation of U.S. Soil Conservation
Service "Best Management Practices" program.
(c) Beaufort will support the development of a comprehensive town -wide stormwater drainage plan.
(d) Beaufort will cooperate with the NCDOT, the North Carolina Division of Environmental
Management, and other state agencies in mitigating the impact of stormwater runoff on all
conservation classified areas. The town will support the Division of Environmental Management
stormwater runoff retention permitting process through its zoning permit system.
(e) The town will attempt to apply for grant funds, and utilize Powell Bill funds, to improve
stormwater drainage systems associated with existing rights -of -way.
(f) The town will develop a comprehensive master drainage plan.
18

Culturalfflistoric Resources
(a) Beaufort shall coordinate all housing code enforcement/redevelopment projects which involve any
historically significant structure with the N.C. Division of Archives and History, to ensure that
any significant architectural details or buildings are identified and preserved.
(b) Beaufort will coordinate all county public works projects with the N.C. Division of Archives and
History, to ensure the identification and preservation of significant archaeological sites.
(c) Beaufort will continue to support and protect the town's Historic District.
Industrial Impacts on Fragile Areas
Only commercial and industrial uses that are water dependent and which cannot function elsewhere or
are supportive of commercial fishing will be allowed in conservation classified areas. Examples of such
uses would include but not necessarily be limited to commercial fishing and fish processing, marinas
consistent with the policies of this plan, boat repair and construction facilities, any business dependent
upon natural salt water as a resource, and restaurants that do not extend into or over estuarine waters
and/or public trust waters. Where zoning exists, all uses must be consistent with established zoning.
Miscellaneous Resource Protection
Package Treatment Plant Use
Beaufort will support the construction of package treatment plants which are approved and permitted by
the State Division of Environmental Management. If any package plants are approved, Beaufort supports
requirement of a specific contingency plan specifying how ongoing private operation and maintenance of
the plant will be provided, and detailing provisions for assumption of the plant into a public system
should the private operation fail or management of the system not meet the conditions of the state permit
(see policy (d) soils).
Marina and Floating Home Development
Beaufort will enforce the following policies to govern floating homes and marina development. Marinas
are considered to be any publicly or privately owned dock constructed to accommodate more than ten
boats, as defined by 15 NCAC 711.208 (b) (5).
(a) Beaufort will allow the construction of open water and upland marinas within its planning
jurisdiction which satisfy the use standards for marinas as specified in 15A NCAC 7H. This shall
include marinas proposed for location within Conservation areas.
(b) Beaufort will allow construction of dry stack storage facilities for boats associated either with or
independent of marinas. All applicable zoning and subdivision regulations must be satisfied.
Construction of associated boat ramps, piers, and bulkheads within conservation areas will be
allowed if 15A NCAC 7H use standards are met.
(c) Beaufort supports the state's minimum use standards for the regulation of floating structures.
(d) Beaufort will annually survey all local anchorages and register all boats on the town's tax rolls.
19

(e) The Town of Beaufort will regulate the number of automobile parking spaces required to serve
marinas as stated in the town's zoning ordinance. The following statement taken from the
ordinance summarizes the town's marina parking space requirements:
Use Classification
Marina and Accessory Uses:
Dry Boat Storage
Wet Boat Storage
- Accessory Uses
Marine Services and Repairs
Boat Launching Ramps
Parking Space Requirements
1 automobile space per 4 dry boat spaces
1 automobile space per 4 wet boat storage spaces
1 space for each 2 employees at maximum employment on a single
shift, plus 2 spaces for each 300 square feet of repair or maintenance
space
1 space per 4 dry boat storage spaces, 1 space per wet boat storage
spaces, 1 space for each 2 employees at maximum employment, plus
2 spaces for each 300 square feet of repair or maintenance space
25 boat trailer spaces (minimum) at least 12 feet by 40 feet
The Board of Adjustment may grant a variance to these requirements which will not result in a violation of this land
use plan.
Mooring Fields
Beaufort is concerned with the potential for the development of mooring fields. The town supports the
development of mooring fields and will enforce its ordinance regulating the establishment of mooring
fields. The ordinance, as it is currently written, regulates the establishment of mooring fields within the
waters of Taylor's Creek. The town will consider amending this ordinance to include all of the waters
within Beaufort's planning jurisdiction.
Development of Sound and Estuarine Islands
(a) Beaufort opposes any development on sound and estuarine islands located within its planning
jurisdiction.
I -I
(b) Beaufort will support the following policies for the Rachel Carson Sanctuary:
— Following research projects, responsible groups and organizations shall remove all
material utilized in the project which is not naturally found in the Rachel Carson
Sanctuary.
The Rachel Carson Sanctuary can be utilized for the deposit of dredge spoil. If spoil is
deposited in the Sanctuary, proper safety measures should be implemented to protect the
public and wildlife from hazards associated with spoil sites such as "quicksand."
However, if deposition must occur, the site should be located and constructed so as to
not obstruct the view of the sound areas from the Beaufort waterfront.
Commercial boat access to the Rachel Carson Sanctuary should be limited. The town
_ will consider adoption of an ordinance to regulate commercial water taxi or ferry service
between the mainland and the Sanctuary areas.
20

Beaufort requests the right to review and comment on all plans for spoil sites to be
located within the town's planning jurisdiction.
Bulkhead Construction
Beaufort supports the construction of bulkheads as long as they fulfill the use standards set forth in 15A
NCAC 7H and the sea level rise policies as defined by this plan.
Sea Level Rise
Beaufort recognizes the uncertainties associated with sea level rise. The rate of rise is difficult to predict.
Those factors combine to make it difficult, if not impossible, to establish specific policies to deal with
the effects of sea level rise.
Beaufort will implement the following policies to respond to sea level rise:
(a) In response to anticipated sea level rise, Beaufort will review all local building and land use
related ordinances to establish setback standards, long-term land use plans, density controls,
bulkhead restrictions, buffer vegetation protection requirements, and building designs which will
facilitate the movement of structures.
(b) Beaufort encourages migrating shorelines in coastal wetland areas in order to preserve coastal
wetlands. The town supports establishment of a state policy which will protect the natural
migration of coastal wetlands. Any state policy addressing migrating shorelines should provide
for the protection of developed areas.
Maritime Forests
Based on the Maritime Forest Protection Initiative, May 24, 1990, there are no major maritime forest
sites that are under Beaufort's planning jurisdiction.
Water Ouality Management
(a) Beaufort supports addressing the following issues in the development of the White Oak Basinwide
Management Plan:
Long-term Growth Mana eg ment
Wastewater management (non -discharge, regionalization, ocean outfall).
Urban stormwater runoff/water quality.
— Role of local land use planning.
Shellfish Water Closures
— Increases in number of acres closed.
— Examine link between growth and closures.
— Opportunities for restoration and prevention.
Animal Operation Waste Management
Between 1990-1991, swine population has more than doubled.
21

1 TI Nutrients/Toxic Dinofiagellate
Reduction in nitrogen and phosphorous levels.
(b) The Beaufort Board of Adjustment will undertake a review of all local land use regulation
ordinances to determine if revisions should be undertaken to respond to specific water quality
management problems. .
(c) The Town of Beaufort will pursue development and adoption of a local ordinance to regulate
swine production. The town is also in favor and fully supports adoption of such an ordinance
by the county.
(d) The Town of Beaufort supports the following actions by the General Assembly and the Governor:
— Sufficient state funding should be appropriated to initiate a program of incentives grants
to address pollution of our rivers from both point sources and nonpoint sources.
An ongoing source of state funding should be developed to provide continuous support
for an incentives grant program.
- — The decision -making process for the award of incentives grants should involve river basin
organizations representing local governments and other interest groups in the review of
all applications for state funding.
The ongoing effort of the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources to
develop administrative rules implementing the proposed Neuse River Basin Management
Strategy should continue to involve local government officials in the development,
review, and refinement of the proposal.
Rachel Carson Reserve
The Town of Beaufort supports the.State's management of the Rachel Carson Reserve (also known as
Carrot Island - Bird Shoal) for research, education, and compatible public uses. The town also approves
the current policy of maintaining a viable population of feral horses on the property.
- C. RESOURCE PRODUCTION AND MANAGEMENT POLICIES
Community Attitude Toward Resource Production and Management
Beaufort will implement policies which support resource production and management. All policies will
meet or exceed 15A NCAC 7H minimum use standards. Resource production should not be allowed to
adversely affect Beaufort's sensitive coastal environment or natural heritage areas.
Recreation Resources
(a) Beaufort will work cooperatively with Carteret County to provide a year-round recreation
program.
22

(b) Beaufort considers coastal wetland areas to be valuable passive recreation areas. These areas
should be protected in their natural state. Only uses which are permitted by 15A NCAC 7H will
be allowed.
(c) Beaufort supports public access to Radio Island shoreline areas.
(d) Beaufort will develop a shoreline access plan to define the need for additional publicly -owned
waterfront recreational facilities within its planning jurisdiction. This effort should be closely
coordinated with shoreline access planning by the county.
Productive Agricultural Lands
Beaufort supports and encourages use of the U.S. Soil Conservation Service "Best Management Practices"
program.
Productive Forest Lands
There are no productive forest lands located within Beaufort's planning jurisdiction. A forest lands policy
is not required.
Aquaculture Activities
Aquaculture is considered the cultivation of aquatic plants and animals under controlled conditions. The
following policies shall apply.
(a) Beaufort encourages all aquaculture activities which meet applicable federal, state and local
policies (see Aquaculture policies b) and c) and permit requirements. However, Beaufort reserves
the right to comment on all aquaculture activities which require Division of Environmental
Management permitting.
(b) Beaufort objects to any discharge of water from aquaculture activities that will degrade in any
way the receiving waters. Beaufort objects to withdrawing water from aquifers or surface sources
if such withdrawal will endanger water quality or water supply from the aquifers or surface
sources.
(c) Beaufort will support only aquaculture activities which do not alter significantly and negatively
the natural environment of conservation areas as shown on the Land Classification Map.
Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Development Impacts on Resources
(a) Residential, commercial and industrial development should be allowed in coastal wetlands which
is consistent with 15A NCAC 7H and the policies contained in this plan.
(b) Beaufort discourages any additional point source discharges of pollution into primary nursery
areas and shellfishing areas. In addition, Beaufort reserves the right to review and comment on
the approval of outfalls on a case -by -case basis.
(c) Residential development meeting the use standards of 15 NCAC 711.0209 shall be allowed in
estuarine shoreline areas.
23

(d) Only commercial and industrial uses that are water dependent and which cannot function
elsewhere or are supportive of commercial fishing will be allowed in conservation classified
shoreline areas. Examples of such uses would include but not necessarily be limited to
commercial fishing and fish processing, marinas consistent with the policies of this plan, boat
repair and construction facilities, any business dependent upon natural salt water as a resource,
and restaurants that do not extend into or over estuarine waters and/or public trust waters. Where
zoning exists, all uses must be consistent with established zoning.
(e) In order to preserve natural vegetation and scenic views, "no buildings or houses or structures
excepting noncommercial docks or piers will be erected on the south side of Front Street in this
(R-8) district."
Off -Road Vehicles
Beaufort opposes the utilization of off -road vehicles in any areas classified as coastal wetlands and in the
entire Rachel Carson Sanctuary.
Peat or Phosphate Mining
_ There are no significant peat or phosphate deposits located within Beaufort's planning jurisdiction. A
policy statement is not required.
Marine Resource Areas
(a) Beaufort supports the use standards for estuarine and public trust areas as specified in 15A NCAC
.0207.
(b) Beaufort reserves the right to review and comment on the policies and requirements of the North
Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries which govern commercial and recreational fisheries and
activities.
(c) Beaufort will consider requesting funding assistance through the Coastal Area Management Act
for the development of a long-term harbor management plan.
D. ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Community Attitude on Economic and Community Development
Beaufort desires to expand its economic base. A reasonable policy of annexation will be maintained.
Beaufort will support growth and development at the densities specified in the land classification
definitions. The Town of Beaufort will pursue the development of an impact study to determine the
growth and development issues and needs associated with the construction of the proposed NC 101
corridor.
Water Supply
There are no significant constraints to development or land development issues relating to the town's
potable water supply. The town's water system will provide adequate water supply throughout the
planning period. The town's policies concerning water supply shall be:
24

(a) The town requires that all existing and new residential and commercial development be connected
to both the town water and sewer systems.
(b) The town will allow the installation of private wells for irrigation only through the NCDEM
permit process.
(c) The town will extend water services beyond its extraterritorial area if an adequate demand for
service exists.
(d) The Town of Beaufort will support a study of the limestone aquifer underlying Carteret County
by the United States Geological Survey. This study would aid in determining the optimum
locations for wells and the long-term viability of the town's water supply. The issue of salt water
intrusion should be addressed by the study. (Recommend deletion).
Sewer System
There are no problems or constraints to development caused by the town's sewage treatment system. The
town will implement the following policies:
(a) The town requires that all existing and new residential and commercial development be connected
to both the town water and sewer systems.
(b) Beaufort will support the development of central sewer service throughout its incorporated area
and its unincorporated planning jurisdiction.
Solid Waste
(a) Beaufort supports Carteret County's participation in a regional multi -county approach to solid
waste management. This includes disposal of waste in the Tri-County Regional Landfill.
(b) The town will support efforts to educate people and businesses on waste reduction and recycling.
The town vigorously supports recycling by all users of the Tri-County Landfill and supports
setting up practical collection methods and education efforts to achieve a high degree of county-
wide recycling.
(c) Beaufort supports the siting of recycling centers within public and commercial land classifications.
Energy Facility Siting and Development
(a) There are no electric generating plants located in Beaufort's planning jurisdiction. The town will
consider the need for establishing energy facilities on a case -by -case basis, judging the need for
development against all identified possible adverse impacts.
(b) Beaufort has some concerns over offshore drilling. In the event that oil or gas is discovered,
Beaufort will not oppose drilling operations and onshore support facilities for which an Environ-
mental Impact Statement has been prepared with a finding of no significant impact on the
environment. Beaufort supports and requests full disclosure of development plans, with
mitigative measures that will be undertaken to prevent adverse impacts on the environment, the
infrastructure, and the social systems of Beaufort and Carteret County. The town also requests
full disclosure of any adopted plans. Offshore drilling and the development of onshore support
25

facilities may have severe costs for the town and county as well as advantages. The costs should
be home by the company(ies) which profits from offshore drilling and onshore support facilities.
Redevelopment of Developed Areas
The most important redevelopment issue confronting the Town of Beaufort would be reconstruction
following a hurricane or other natural disaster. The town will implement its storm hazard mitigation
post -disaster recovery plan to control redevelopment. However, the town will allow the reconstruction
of any structures demolished by natural disaster which will comply with existing state and local codes.
A second redevelopment problem is the preservation of housing. The town will enforce its minimum
housing code to ensure that minimum housing standards are met. Residential revitalization projects will
be pursued where substandard housing exists. State and federal housing rehabilitation grants will be
sought.
Estuarine Access
Beaufort supports the state's shoreline access policies as set forth in NCAC Chapter 15A, Subchapter 7M.
The town will conform to CAMA and other state and federal environmental regulations affecting the
development of estuarine access areas. The town will support development of a detailed shoreline access
plan during the five-year planning period.
Community Facilities
During the planning period, Beaufort will develop a community services/facilities plan (as a stand-alone
document, not as an expansion of this plan), which will define existing deficiencies in police protection,
fire protection, local administrative buildings, public recreational facilities, public shoreline access, and
public parks. This plan will not address school system needs. The plan will prioritize needs and make
specific recommendations concerning financing and budgeting the high priority needs.
- - Types and Locations of Desired Industry
i
Beaufort desires to achieve responsible industrial development which will not adversely affect the natural
environment or the quality of established residential areas. Large vacant areas exist within the town's
planning jurisdiction which have the potential for industrial development.
The following industrial development policies will be applied:
(a) Industrial sites should be accessible to municipal/central water and sewer services.
(b) Industries which are noxious by reason of the emission of smoke, odor, dust, glare, noise, and
vibrations, and those which deal primarily in hazardous products such as explosives, should not
be located in Beaufort.
(c) Industrial development and/or industrial zoning should not infringe on established residential
development.
OM

Commitment to State and Federal Programs
Beaufort is generally receptive to state and federal programs, particularly those which provide
improvements to the town. The town will continue to fully support such programs, especially the North
Carolina Department of Transportation road and bridge improvement programs, which are very important
to the Town of Beaufort.
Examples of other state and federal programs that are important to and supported by Beaufort include:
dredging and channel maintenance by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; federal and state projects which
provide efficient and safe boat access for sport fishing; and community development block grants, housing
for the elderly, low -to -moderate income housing, housing rehabilitation, programs which help remove
impediments to the handicapped, and North Carolina Housing Finance Agency housing improvement
programs. However, Beaufort does not support expansion of military restricted airspace in eastern North
Carolina.
Assistance in Channel Maintenance
Proper maintenance of channels is very important to Beaufort because of the substantial economic impact
of commercial and sport fisheries. If silt or other deposits fill in the channels, safe and efficient
movement of commercial and sport fishing and transport vessels could be impeded. Beaufort will support
and cooperate with efforts by the Corps of Engineers and state officials to maintain channels.
Assistance in Interstate Waterways
Beaufort considers the interstate waterway to be a valuable economic asset. The town will provide
assistance in maintaining the waterway by helping to obtain or providing dredge spoil sites and, when
possible, providing easements across county -owned property for work.
Tourism
Beaufort will implement the following policies to further the development of tourism:
(a) Beaufort will support North Carolina Department of Transportation projects to improve access
to the town.
(b) Beaufort will support projects that will increase public access to shoreline areas.
(c) Beaufort will continue to support the activities of the North Carolina Division of Travel and
Tourism; specifically, the monitoring of tourism -related industry, efforts to promote
tourism -related commercial activity, and efforts to enhance and provide shoreline resources.
(d) Beaufort will preserve its historic district and Taylor's Creek waterfront areas.
(e) The Town of Beaufort supports the State's management of the Rachel Carson Reserve (also
known as Carrot Island - Bird Shoal) for research, education, and compatible public uses. The
town also approves the current policy of maintaining a viable population of feral horses on the
property.
27

Transportation
(a) Beaufort supports implementation of the following land transportation improvements:
— A connector between N.C. 101 and U.S. 70 (the corridor for this road has not yet been
determined).
— Reroute U.S. 70 from Cedar Street to Turner/West Beaufort Road.
Utilize Orange and Turner Streets as a one-way pair providing access to the waterfront.
Elimination of the "Y" intersection with N.C. 101 and U.S. 70
-- — Replacement of the drawbridge between Morehead City and Beaufort with a medium
height bridge. A medium height bridge is considered to be between 40-45 feet. In
FY98, a planning study will be conducted by the DOT Planning and Environmental
Branch to determine the exact recommended bridge height.
A possible minor thoroughfare is proposed to connect Steep Point Road just east of U.S.
70 and Mulberry Street at its intersection with Ocean Street.
Land Use Trends and Issues
The town's land use trends and issues have been thoroughly discussed in other sections of this plan.
Those trends include:
— Increasing residential development within the town's extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ).
— Continued minor losses of agricultural and forestlands.
— Continued commercial development along Cedar Street and US 70 from Steep Point
Road, north to the town's corporate limit line.
— Increased traffic congestion along the US 70 corridor.
Construction of a new bridge on US 70 at Beaufort Channel to alleviate disruptions to
east -west traffic.
Continued extension of water and sewer utilities into the ETJ will serve as a catalyst for
development.
Continued expansion of the Michael J. Smith Airport.
These land use changes should be controlled through existing local, state, and federal land use regulations
including CAMA, "404" regulations, the town's subdivision and zoning ordinances, and local building
inspections program. The Town of Beaufort should work towards establishing a comprehensive
annexation plan and growth management plan during the planning period.
In addition to the town policies provided in this Executive Summary, the FY96 Land Use Plan Update
includes a Storm Hazard Mitigation, Post -Disaster Recovery, and Evacuation Plans section. A complete
FT

copy of the FY96 Land Use Plan, including the Storm Hazard Mitigation, Post -Disaster Recovery, and
Evacuation Plans, is on file at the Beaufort Town Hall and available to the public.
29