Land Use Plan 2006

2006 LAND USE PLAN

Submitted to State for Review: March 22, 2006 and August 16, 2006
Agency Comments Received: June 8, 2006
Date of Local Public Hearing: September 18, 2006
Adopted by the County Board of Commissioners: October 2, 2006
Future Land Use Map Revised: November 20, 2006
Submitted to State for Certification: April 17, 2007
Certified by the Coastal Resources Commission: May 18, 2007
Amended by the Board of Commissioners: August 18, 2008
Certified by the Coastal Resources Commission: September 25, 2008
Amended by the Board of Commissioners: April 20, 2009
Certified by the Coastal Resources Commission: June 24, 2009
Amended by the Board of Commissioners: March 18, 2019
Certified by the Coastal Resources Commission: July 2, 2019
Amended by the Board of Commissioners: October 4, 2021
Certified by the Coastal Resources Commission: December 7, 2021
Amended by the Board of Commissioners: November 1, 2021
Certified by the Coastal Resources Commission: December 7, 2021
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
TOC-1
TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................Intro-1
BACKGROUND ..............................................................................................................................Intro-1
PURPOSE OF THE PLAN...............................................................................................................Intro-1
A GUIDE TO DECISION-MAKING...............................................................................................Intro-2
PLANNING SUBAREAS ................................................................................................................Intro-2
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN PLAN DEVELOPMENT.............................................................Intro-2
Phase 1 Citizen Participation Meetings ..............................................................................Intro-3
Phase 2 Citizen Participation Meetings ..............................................................................Intro-3
Other Avenues for Public Input..........................................................................................Intro-3
GROWTH ANALYSIS ....................................................................................................................Intro-4
A PLAN FOR THE FUTURE ..........................................................................................................Intro-4
TOOLS FOR MANAGING DEVELOPMENT................................................................................Intro-4
SECTION 1: COMMUNITY CONCERNS AND ASPIRATIONS .....................................................1-1
INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................1-1
KEY PLANNING ISSUES BY SUBAREA...........................................................................................1-1
LAND USE PLAN QUESTIONNAIRE.................................................................................................1-5
VISION STATEMENT ..........................................................................................................................1-6
SECTION 2: POPULATION, HOUSING AND ECONOMY .........................................................2-1
POPULATION........................................................................................................................................2-1
County Growth Relative to Other NC Counties, Including Coastal Counties..........................2-1
Currituck County Relative to Its Metropolitan Statistical Area................................................2-3
Geographic Distribution of Growth..........................................................................................2-3
Population Age Characteristics.................................................................................................2-4
State Estimates and Projections of Population Change.............................................................2-6
Additional Population Growth Scenarios .................................................................................2-7
Peak Season Population Estimates............................................................................................2-7
Estimates of Future Peak Season Populations ..........................................................................2-8
HOUSING...............................................................................................................................................2-9
Housing Characteristics............................................................................................................2-9
Housing Types........................................................................................................................2-10
Housing Age...........................................................................................................................2-12
Building Permits.....................................................................................................................2-12
ECONOMY ..........................................................................................................................................2-13
Overview of Key Economic Indicators...................................................................................2-13
Place of Employment..............................................................................................................2-14
Economy by Subarea..............................................................................................................2-16
Tourism Impact.......................................................................................................................2-18
SECTION 3: NATURAL SYSTEMS ANALYSIS ..........................................................................3-1
INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................3-1
NATURAL FEATURES INVENTORY................................................................................................3-1
Areas of Environmental Concern (AECs) ................................................................................3-1
Estuarine System AECs............................................................................................................3-1
Ocean Hazard System AECs ....................................................................................................3-3
Soil Characteristics...................................................................................................................3-3
Water Quality Classifications...................................................................................................3-4
Primary Nursery Areas .............................................................................................................3-5
Flood Hazards and Storm Surge Areas.....................................................................................3-5
Anadromous fish spawning areas .............................................................................................3-6
Non-Coastal Wetlands..............................................................................................................3-7
Natural Heritage Areas .............................................................................................................3-7
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan

TOC-2
ENVIRONMENTAL COMPOSITE MAP.............................................................................................3-7
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS.....................................................................................................3-9
Water Quality in Currituck County and Surrounding Region...................................................3-9
Natural Hazards......................................................................................................................3-12
Natural Resources...................................................................................................................3-16
SECTION 4: EXISTING LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT ......................................................4-1
INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................4-1
EXISTING LAND USE..........................................................................................................................4-1
Mainland Land Use Summary..................................................................................................4-3
Knotts Island Land Use Summary............................................................................................4-5
Outer Banks Beaches Land Use Summary.................................................................4-6
DEVELOPMENT TRENDS PROJECTED FOR THE NEXT FIVE YEARS.........................4-7
Future Development by Planning Subareas, Next Five Years..................................................4-8
Moyock.......................................................................................................................4-8
Gibbs Woods..............................................................................................................4-8
Shawboro/Crawford ...................................................................................................4-8
Courthouse Area.........................................................................................................4-8
Barco/Coinjock/Airport Area.....................................................................................4-9
Intersection of Proposed Mid-County Bridge and US Highway 158 .........................4-9
Grandy Area...............................................................................................................4-9
Jarvisburg Area...........................................................................................................4-9
Point Harbor Area.......................................................................................................4-9
Corolla Area.............................................................................................................4-10
Carova Area..............................................................................................................4-10
Knotts Island.............................................................................................................4-10
FUTURE LAND USE NEEDS FORECAST ..........................................................................................4-10
Methodology...........................................................................................................................4-10
Residential Land Use Needs...................................................................................................4-11
Non-Residential Land Use Needs for the Period 2005 to 2025..............................................4-12

SECTION 5: COMMUNITY FACILITIES ANALYSIS .......................................................................5-1
INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................5-1
WATER SYSTEMS................................................................................................................................5-1
Water Services in the Mainland Subarea..................................................................................5-2
Water Services in the Beach Subarea .......................................................................................5-3
Water Services in the Knotts Island Subarea............................................................................5-3
SEWER SYSTEMS................................................................................................................................5-4
More Details on Sewage Disposal in Currituck County...........................................................5-4
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS..........................................................................................................5-5
Thoroughfare Plans...................................................................................................................5-5
Bridges......................................................................................................................................5-6
Capacity and Traffic Volume....................................................................................................5-6
STORMWATER / DRAINAGE.............................................................................................................5-9
Responsibility for Stormwater and Drainage............................................................................5-9
Existing Drainage Problems by Subarea...................................................................................5-9
Stormwater System Requirements Subject to EPA’s Stormwater Phase II Final Rules.........5-11
Schools..................................................................................................................................................5-12
Public Safety.........................................................................................................................................5-13
Parks and Recreation.............................................................................................................................5-14

SECTION 6: LAND SUITABILITY ANALYSIS ............................................................................6-1
WHAT IS LAND SUITABILITY ANALYSIS?....................................................................................6-1
Land Suitability Map................................................................................................................6-1
Suitability Rating System .........................................................................................................6-1
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
TOC-3
Assessment of Land Suitability Map as to Vacant or Underutilized Land that is Suitable for
Development.............................................................................................................................6-3
SECTION 7: REVIEW OF EXISTING POLICIES .........................................................................7-1
SECTION 8: LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT GOALS ...........................................................8-1
INTRODUCTION TO THE GOALS.....................................................................................................8-1
Ten Land Use and Development Goals ....................................................................................8-1

SECTION 9: LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT POLICIES .......................................................9-1
INTRODUCTION TO THE POLICIES.................................................................................................9-1
How to tell a policy from an implementation action or a standard...........................................9-1
Organization of the Policies......................................................................................................9-2
PUBLIC ACCESS ..................................................................................................................................9-3
Public Access Policies (PA)......................................................................................................9-3
LAND USE COMPATIBILITY.............................................................................................................9-5
Policies To Conserve Environmentally Sensitive Areas (Es)...................................................9-5
Agricultural And Rural Area Preservation Policies..................................................................9-6
Housing And Neighborhood Development Policies.................................................................9-7
Commercial Development Policies...........................................................................................9-8
Industrial Development Policies...............................................................................................9-9
INFRASTRUCTURE CARRYING CAPACITY.................................................................................9-10
Transportation Policies...........................................................................................................9-10
Water And Sewer Service Policies .........................................................................................9-12
Policies For School Facilities..................................................................................................9-13
Parks And Recreation Policies................................................................................................9-14
Solid Waste Management Policies..........................................................................................9-14
Policies On Planning And Paying For Infrastructure And
Services...................................................................................................................................9-15
NATURAL HAZARD AREAS (NH)...................................................................................................9-16
Natural Hazard Area Policies..................................................................................................9-16
Water Quality........................................................................................................................................9-17
LOCAL COUNTYWIDE CONCERNS...............................................................................................9-18
Economic Development Policies............................................................................................9-18
Community Appearance Policies............................................................................................9-19
Historic Preservation Policies.................................................................................................9-20
Policies On Public Safety Services.........................................................................................9-20
Special Policies Applicable Countywide................................................................................9-20
SUBAREA CONCERNS......................................................................................................................9-21
Special Policies Applicable To The Mainland........................................................................9-21
Special Policies Applicable To The Outer Banks...................................................................9-21
Special Policies Applicable To Knotts Island.........................................................................9-22

SECTION 10: RELATIONSHIP OF PLAN TO MANAGEMENT TOPICS .................................10-1
Consistency between Goals/Policies and Management Topics.............................................................10-1
A. Public Access......................................................................................................................10-1
B. Land Use Compatibility......................................................................................................10-1
C. Infrastructure Carrying Capacity ......................................................................................10-1
D. Natural and Man-Made Hazards .......................................................................................10-2
E. Water Quality.....................................................................................................................10-2
F. Local Concerns...................................................................................................................10-2
Consistency between Future Land Use Map and CAMA Land Use Plan Requirements......................10-3
Residential Development Density ...........................................................................................10-3
Comparison of Environmental Composite Map, Land Suitability Map, and Land Classification
Map.......................................................................................................................................................10-4
Environmental Composite Map and Land Classification Map ...............................................10-4
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan

TOC-4
Land Suitability Map and Land Classification Map ...............................................................10-5
Comparison of Spatial Patterns of Land Classification and Planned Extension of Water and
Sewer Services ........................................................................................................................10-5
Natural Hazards: Land Use and Development in Natural Hazard Areas ..............................10-5
Comparison of Spatial Patterns of Land Classification and Protection of Shellfish Waters ..10-5
Analysis of Impacts of Currituck County Policies and Actions on Management Topics .....................10-5

SECTION 11: LAND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM ....................................................................11-1
Purpose of Land Classification System.................................................................................................11-1
Proposed Land Classifications..............................................................................................................11-1
Conservation Areas.................................................................................................................11-1
Rural Areas (Areas Preferred for Open Space and
Agricultural Preservation).......................................................................................................11-2
Limited Service Areas* (Areas Preferred for Low Density Development)............................11-2
Full Service Areas* (Areas Preferred for Community Centers) .............................................11-3
Sub-Area Concerns and Policies...........................................................................................................11-4
Moyock Area..........................................................................................................................11-4
Shawboro/Crawford................................................................................................................11-5
Courthouse Area.....................................................................................................................11-6
Barco/Coinjock/Airport Area..................................................................................................11-6
Intersection of Proposed Mid-County Bridge and US Highway 158......................................11-7
Aydlett and Waterlily/Churches Island...................................................................................11-7
Grandy....................................................................................................................................11-8
Jarvisburg................................................................................................................................11-9
Point Harbor............................................................................................................................11-9
Corolla..................................................................................................................................11-10
Carova...................................................................................................................................11-11
Knotts Island and Gibbs Woods ...........................................................................................11-11
Analysis of Future Land Use Map ......................................................................................................11-11
SECTION 12: TOOLS FOR MANAGING DEVELOPMENT ......................................................12-1
Introduction...........................................................................................................................................12-1
Role and Status of Plan/Primary Users of the Plan...............................................................................12-1
Board of County Commissioners............................................................................................12-1
County Planning Board...........................................................................................................12-1
Property Owners and Developers ...........................................................................................12-1
County Residents, Generally ..................................................................................................12-2
County Administrative Staff...................................................................................................12-2
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management/Other State and Federal Agencies............12-2
Existing Development Management Program.......................................................................................12-2
Existing Ordinances and Plans................................................................................................12-2
Review Boards/Committees....................................................................................................12-3
Other Growth Management Tools in Place.............................................................................12-3
New Growth Management Tools Recommended .................................................................................12-3
Public Access, Parks and Open Space....................................................................................12-4
Development Controls/Standards ...........................................................................................12-4
Community Appearance.........................................................................................................12-4
Development Impacts.............................................................................................................12-4
Housing Needs........................................................................................................................12-5
County Finances .....................................................................................................................12-5
Environmental Quality............................................................................................................12-5

SECTION 13: ACTION PLAN AND SCHEDULE.......................................................................13-1
Introduction...........................................................................................................................................13-1
Action Matrix........................................................................................................................................13-1
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
TOC-5
REFERENCES
APPENDICES ..........................................................................................................................................A-1
APPENDIX A. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN............................................................................A-1
APPENDIX B. OPINION SURVEY/QUESTIONAIRE.......................................................................A-8
APPENDIX C. MAJOR LAND USE ISSUES IDENTIFIED BY CITIZENS AT COMMUNITY
MEETINGS ...........................................................................................................................................A-9
APPENDIX D. EXPLANATION OF DEMOGRAPHIC AND POPULATION STATISTICS.........A-13
APPENDIX E. FUTURE LAND USE PLAN COMPATIBILITY MATRIX.....................................A-14
APPENDIX F. FUTURE LAND USE PLAN COMPATIBILITY MATRIX.....................................A-15
APPENDIX G. INFRASTRUCTURE ANALYSIS - CURRENT CONDITIONS...............................G-1
APPENDIX H. INFRASTRUCTURE ANALYSIS - MAXIMUM DENSITY BUILD OUT..............H-1
APPENDIX I. MAPS.................................................................................................................................

LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 2.1 TOTAL POPULATION AND PERCENT CHANGE FOR NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTIES.............................................................................................................................................2-1
TABLE 2.2 POPULATION AND PERCENT CHANGE FOR CURRITUCK COUNTY,
NORFOLK-VA BEACH-NEWPORT NEWS MSA AND REGION R ................................................2-3
TABLE 2.3 TOTAL POPULATION AND PERCENT CHANGE FOR CURRITUCK
COUNTY AND SUBAREAS ................................................................................................................2-4
TABLE 2.4 MAINLAND POPULATION BY AGE GROUP ..............................................................2-5
TABLE 2.5 KNOTTS ISLAND POPULATION BY AGE GROUP .....................................................2-5
TABLE 2.6 OUTER BANKS POPULATION BY AGE GROUP ........................................................2-6
TABLE 2.7 PROJECTED POPULATIONS BY AGE GROUP AND PERCENT CHANGE ..............2-6
TABLE 2.8 PROJECTED YEAR ROUND POPULATION GROWTH 2000-2025 ............................2-7
TABLE 2.9 CURRITUCK COUNTY'S 2000 PEAK SEASONAL POPULATION ............................2-8
TABLE 2.10 CURRITUCK COUNTY ESTIMATED TOTAL POPULATION
DURING SUMMER SEASON .............................................................................................................2-9
TABLE 2.11 MAINLAND, CURRITUCK COUNTY HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS ..................2-9
TABLE 2.12 KNOTTS ISLAND, CURRITUCK COUNTY HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS ......2-10
TABLE 2.13 OUTER BANKS, CURRITUCK COUNTY HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS ..........2-10
TABLE 2.14 TYPES OF HOUSING UNITS MAINLAND, CURRITUCK COUNTY .....................2-11
TABLE 2.15 TYPES OF HOUSING UNITS KNOTTS ISLAND, CURRITUCK COUNTY ...........2-11
TABLE 2.16 TYPES OF HOUSING UNITS OUTER BANKS, CURRITUCK COUNTY ...............2-11
TABLE 2.17 HOUSING UNIT AGE ..................................................................................................2-12
TABLE 2.18 CURRITUCK COUNTY BUILDING PERMITS .........................................................2-13
TABLE 2.19 GROSS RETAIL SALES (IN 1000’S) ..........................................................................2-13
TABLE 2.20 EMPLOYMENT STATUS BY PLACE OF RESIDENCE ...........................................2-13
TABLE 2.21 CURRITUCK COUNTY KEY ECONOMIC INDICATORS .......................................2-14
TABLE 2.22 CURRITUCK COUNTY BUSINESS PATTERNS ......................................................2-14
TABLE 2.23 WORKPLACE FOR CURRITUCK COUNTY LABOR FORCE .................................2-15
TABLE 2.24 2002 NAICS BUSINESS PATTERNS BY ZIP CODE .................................................2-16
TABLE 2.25 2000 SEASONAL HOUSING UNITS RANKING .......................................................2-18
TABLE 2.26 TOURISM IMPACT IN CURRITUCK COUNTY .......................................................2-19
TABLE 3.1 DWQ PRIMARY CLASSIFICATIONS ............................................................................3-5
TABLE 3.2 CURRITUCK COUNTY PRESENT VULNERABILITY ..............................................3-14
TABLE 3.3 SUMMARY OF REPORTED STORM-RELATED DAMAGE AND
CASUALTIES IN CURRITUCK COUNTY .......................................................................................3-15
TABLE 4.1 CURRITUCK COUNTY LAND USE (ACRES) ..............................................................4-2
TABLE 4.2 DEVELOPED LAND IN CURRITUCK COUNTY ..........................................................4-2
TABLE 4.3 APPROVED SUBDIVISION LOTS 1998-2003 ...............................................................4-3
TABLE 4.4 LAND USE PERCENTAGES FOR THE MAINLAND ...................................................4-3
TABLE 4.5 LAND USE PERCENTAGES FOR KNOTTS ISLAND ..................................................4-5
TABLE 4.6 LAND USE PERCENTAGES FOR THE OUTER BANKS BEACHES ..........................4-6
TABLE 4.7 FUTURE LAND NEEDS FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DURING
THE PERIOD 2005 TO 2025 ..............................................................................................................4-12
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan

TOC-6

TABLE 4.8 EXISTING LAND USE IN DEVELOPMENT, 1990 TO 2005 ......................................4-12
TABLE 4.9 PROJECTED LAND USE IN DEVELOPMENT, 2010 TO 2025 ...................................4-13
TABLE 4.10 ADDITIONAL LAND AREA NEEDED FOR DEVELOPMENT, 2005 TO 2020 ......4-13
TABLE 5.1 FUNCTIONALLY OBSOLETE AND STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT
BRIDGES (1988 AND 1999 THOROUGHFARE PLANS ...................................................................5-6
TABLE 5.2 1999 AND 2002 TRAFFIC VOLUMES ............................................................................5-7
TABLE 6.1 CURRITUCK COUNTY LAND SUITABILITY ANALYSIS WEIGHTS ......................6-2
TABLE 10.1 FUTURE LAND CLASSIFICATIONS RELATED TO DEVELOPMENT
DENSITY ............................................................................................................................................10-3
TABLE 10.2 SUB-AREAS RELATED TO DEVELOPMENT DENSITY ........................................10-4
TABLE 11.1 COMPARISON OF LAND ALLOCATED TO FUTURE LAND USE
AND PROJECTED LAND NEEDS, 2025 ........................................................................................11-12
TABLE 11.2 DISTRIBUTION OF ACREAGES BETWEEN THE CLASSIFICATIONS
AND LAND USE DESIGNATIONS ................................................................................................11-13
TABLE A-1 CONSISTENCY REVIEW OF FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATIONS
AND EXISTING ZONING DISTRICTS ...........................................................................................A-14
TABLE A-2 CONSISTENCY REVIEW OF POLICIES SUGGESTING REGULATORY
ACTION AND EXISTING ZONING DISTRICTS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS .............A-5

Introduction to the Land Use Plan
Introduction-1
Introduction
BACKGROUND
The 2005 Currituck County Land Use Plan represents an update to the 1990 Currituck County Land
Use Plan, which was prepared by the Currituck County Planning Board, Board of Commissioners and
Planning Department. The 1990 plan was locally adopted by the Currituck County Board of
Commissioners on June 3, 1991, and was certified by the Coastal Resources Commission (CRC) on
July 25, 1991. A draft update to the 1990 Land Use Plan was prepared in 1998, but was not adopted by
the County. As a result, the 1990 plan remained the “plan of record” or official land use plan. However,
there was beneficial information contained in the 1998 draft plan, which was used to assist in
development of the current planning effort.

The 2005 Currituck County Land Use Plan Update is prepared in accordance with the requirements
contained in the North Carolina Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA), the North Carolina Coastal
Resources Commission (CRC) Land Use Planning Requirements [15A NCAC7B] and the relevant
planning process requirements of Local Planning and Management Grants [1 5A NCAC 7L]. The Land
Use Plan Update also utilizes the methodology and data sources suggested by the Technical Manual for
Coastal Land Use Planning, prepared by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources.

In November 2001, the CRC adopted revisions to the 1996 Land Use Planning Requirements. The new
guidelines are designed to be less complicated than past guidelines, better tailored to the needs of local
governments and more in line with the goals of CAMA. The revised guidelines became effective in
August 2002, and are the basis for this planning effort.

The CAMA legislation requires that each of the twenty coastal counties prepare and adopt a land use
plan. Incorporated municipalities within these counties have either the option of adopting individual
plans, or the option of falling under the authority of the County plan. This Land Use Plan encompasses
the entirety of the County.
PURPOSE OF THE PLAN
The Land Use Plan is intended to provide a framework that will guide local government officials and
private citizens as they make day-to-day and long-term decisions affecting development. The Land Use
Plan contains information about the physical appearance of Currituck County as it exists today, what
directions the County should take in the future and the steps that need to be taken to get there.

By serving as the overall “blueprint” for development of Currituck County, the implementation of the
Land Use Plan will result in the most suitable and appropriate use of the land and provision of public
services. Use of the Plan will lead to the protection of natural resources, as well as public health, safety
and welfare.

The Land Use Plan focuses on the physical development of Currituck County. It contains policy
statements established through the identification of community goals (broad statements describing the
values of the community) and implementation actions (i.e. actions to be taken to fulfill community
goals and to implement policies). The Plan is general, or “broad brush,” in that its recommendations are
area-wide, rather than site specific. The Land Use Plan is also comprehensive in that it includes all
areas of the County, as well as all elements that affect its physical development (such as population
trends, environmental features, utilities, transportation and housing).

Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
Introduction-2
A GUIDE TO DECISION-MAKING
The Land Use Plan serves as a policy guide for decision making on matters related to the physical
development of the County. Typical decisions facing appointed and elected officials include rezoning
requests and proposals to change land use regulations. In addition to serving as a policy guide, the Land
Use Plan is used by citizens, developers, and administrators to obtain facts about the County. The Plan
will also be used by local, state and federal agencies in various permitting decisions (including CAMA
permits), project funding and project consistency determinations. The effective period for the 2005
Land Use Plan Update is the ten-year period following adoption of the plan.
PLANNING SUBAREAS
Currituck County is geographically divided into three distinct subareas:
• Mainland, including Gibbs Woods;
• Knotts Island; and
• Outer Banks beaches.

Due to the vast differences (such as geography, development patterns, and economy) the Land Use Plan
addresses these areas individually. For an overview map of the townships and communities in Currituck
County, see Map 1.1.

Even with these distinctions between subareas, there are also large differences within these subareas.
For example, the Outer Banks beaches are really composed of two vastly different beach communities.
The northern most part called Carova and often referred to as the “Off-Road” area, approximately 8
miles in length, has no asphalted or improved roads, no central water or sewer systems and is
designated by the Federal Government as a C.B.R.A (Coastal Barrier Resource Act zone) which
prohibits any federal flood insurance policies to be written for this area.

In contrast, Corolla, or the “On Road” area of the Outer Banks beaches has access from a State
maintained road (NC-12 Ocean Trail), is developed mostly as PUD’s with central water and sewage,
and all utilities underground.

Major distinctions can also be drawn between the Northern Mainland, with the huge influence of
Hampton Roads, Virginia area creating demands for residential development, while in the Southern
sector, the effect of service related businesses to serve Currituck and Dare County beaches is creating a
metal building/manufacturing land use that is conflicting with upscale residential development.
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN PLAN DEVELOPMENT
The Coastal Resources Commission places great emphasis on involving citizens and property owners in
the development and implementation of the Land Use Plan. The goal is to involve as many citizens as
possible in the development of the plan, and thereby enhance the likelihood that the plan will be
implemented. Accordingly, as part of the planning process, the Currituck County Board of
Commissioners adopted a Citizen Participation Plan (Appendix A) that designated a Steering
Committee as the lead group responsible for preparation of the Land Use Plan. The Steering Committee
is composed of citizens that represent a broad cross-section of the population of Currituck County. The
purpose of the Citizen Participation Plan is to ensure that all interested citizens have an opportunity to
participate in the development of the plan. The Citizen Participation Plan describes the public
participation tools that are to be used to inform the public of planning progress and to solicit public
participation. The Citizen Participation Plan also provides a general outline of the Steering Committee’s
meeting schedule for discussion and development of the Land Use Plan.

Introduction to the Land Use Plan
Introduction-3
Phase 1 Citizen Participation Meetings
In accordance with the Citizen Participation Plan for Phase 1, the Steering Committee held a series of
initial public information meetings in the three subareas. These meetings were held to receive public
input from citizens on issues, concerns and opportunities available to the County. The following
meetings were held and the number of attendees is shown below:
• November 24, 2003 at the Old Historic Courthouse Building in Currituck (16)
• December 9, 2003 at the Corolla Fire Department (24)
• January 20, 2004 at Knotts Island Elementary School (42)
• January 26, 2004 at Griggs Elementary School (12)

A total of 94 people attended and contributed to these discussions.
Phase 2 Citizen Participation Meetings
Citizen participation during Phase 2 also focused on a series of face-to-face meetings around the county
to receive public input from citizens on proposed policies, actions and the land classification map.
Future of Currituck Week featured four open-house-style public input meetings hosted by the Steering
Committee and designed to maximize citizen comment and dialogue with the Committee members.
Each of the four meetings was held in a different area of the county to allow for maximum participation
by citizens nearby. The following meetings were held and the number of attendees is shown below:

More than 325 people attended and contributed to these discussions.
Other Avenues for Public Input
All meetings of the Steering Committee held over the course of the plan’s development were open to
the public. Participation by non-resident property owners in the planning process was encouraged by
regular planning updates to the Currituck County website, including the posting of an opinion survey or
questionnaire (see Appendix B) to be submitted online. Viewers of the website were encouraged to
direct questions and comments to the consultant retained by the County to assist in development of the
Plan.

During Phase 1, the Land Use Plan Steering Committee reviewed the technical information developed
for the Land Use Plan Update and identified major land use assets and problems as a basis for the
description of the Community Concerns and Aspirations section of this document. The assets, problems
and key planning issues identified through this process, as well as public comments provided at the
Public Information Meetings were used by the Steering Committee to develop the Community Vision.
The Community Vision serves as the foundation for the objectives and policies contained in the Land
Use Plan.

During Phase 2, the Steering Committee reviewed each and every policy and implementation action
proposed for the plan. The Committee also reviewed all mapped information leading to the
• February 14, 2005 at Moyock Middle School (75)
• February 15, 2005 at the Corolla Fire Department (150)
• February 16, 2005 at Griggs Elementary School (65)
• February 17, 2005 at Knotts Island Elementary School (35)
June 16, 2005 at Powells Point Community Center
• July 21, 2005 at Powells Point Community Center (75)
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
Introduction-4
development of the Land Classification Map. Committee members were directly involved in framing
land use trends and policy directions for all subareas of the County. They also served as hosts for the
Future of Currituck meetings, actively engaging citizens in dialogue about the proposed policies and
actions during a “walk-around survey”. Following the Open Houses, the Committee met again to
review and edit those policy and action statements for which there was some level of disagreement.
Finally, Committee members met jointly with the board of County Commissioners and County
Planning Board twice during Phase 2 to identify priority issues and to discuss proposed policy
solutions.
GROWTH ANALYSIS
One of several steps in the planning process included an analysis of existing and emerging conditions
that affect Currituck County. Examples include current and projected population trends, housing
characteristics and economic conditions. Natural systems and environmental hazards were analyzed and
compiled onto an environmental composite map, customized for each subarea. This map depicts
environmentally sensitive areas where development may already be limited or limited in the future due
to public safety issues or protection of the environment. Other factors that were analyzed and
considered in the planning process included exiting land use and development patterns, projected land
use needs and community facilities and utilities.

A land suitability analysis was conducted to determine the relative suitability for development of land
in each subarea of the County. Considerations included proximity to important natural features, existing
and planned community services and existing developed areas. The impact of existing local, state and
federal regulations affecting growth and development was also factored in to the analysis.
A PLAN FOR THE FUTURE
A Plan for the Future was developed and includes land use and development goals and policies for the
County and its subareas. This section of the Land Use Plan addressed the CRC’s management topics,
which include the following: Public Access, Land Use Compatibility, Infrastructure Carrying Capacity,
Natural Hazard Areas, Water Quality and Local Areas of Concern. A Land Classification Map was
developed to show areas designated for conservation / open space as well as areas that are expected to
see future growth and development of varying degrees.
TOOLS FOR MANAGING DEVELOPMENT
An implementation strategy, or Tools for Managing Development, was developed to describe Currituck
County’s implementation strategies for the updated Land Use Plan. This includes a description of
existing ordinances, policies, codes and regulations and how they will be coordinated and employed to
implement land use and development policies. This section also describes additional tools, such as new
or amended ordinances, capital improvements, property acquisitions or other specific projects selected
by the County to implement the updated Land Use Plan.

CURRITUCK COUNTY 2006 LAND USE PLAN

Board of County Commissioners
Eldon L. Miller, Jr.
J. Owen Etheridge
Ernie Bowden
Paul R. Martin, Vice-Chairman
S. Paul O’Neal, Chairman

Land Use Plan Steering Committee
David Palmer, Chair
Martha Burns
Woody Gardner
Eddie Hawley
Connie Johnson
Joe Kovacs
Phil Kratzer
Sandra Sutton
Ginger Webster
Jerry Wright

County Staff
Daniel F. Scanlon II, County Manager
Sarah E. Keifer, Planning Director
Gary Ferguson, Planning Director (2002-2006)
Tammy Underwood, Administrative Assistant
David Webb, Chief Planner
Donna Voliva, Planner
Tammy Glave, Planner
Cheryl Eggar, Planner
Harry Lee, Geographic Information Systems

Consultants
Blue: Phase I
Glenn Harbeck Associates: Phase II

Funding Acknowledgement
The preparation of this document was financed, in part, through a grant provided by the North
Carolina Coastal Management Program, through funds provided by the Coastal Zone Management
Act of 1972, as amended, which is administered by the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource
Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Currituck is Calling

!
"

#
$#
%
Currituck is calling…

-Hope Slaughter, Moyock

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
Section 1: Community Concerns and Aspirations
1-1
SECTION 1: COMMUNITY CONCERNS AND
ASPIRATIONS
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of the Community Concerns and Aspirations section of the Currituck County Land
Use Plan is to provide overall guidance and direction for the development of the plan. The Land
Use Plan Steering Committee used the following three-part process to describe dominant growth-
related conditions that influence land use and development patterns in Currituck County, describe
key planning issues and develop a community vision:
• Review of technical information related to existing and emerging conditions;
• Identification of major community assets and problems related to land use and
development on a subarea basis; and
• Development of the community vision statement to serve as the foundation for more
specific objectives and policies stated elsewhere in the Land Use Plan.
KEY PLANNING ISSUES BY SUBAREA
Between November 2003 and January 2004, the Land Use Plan Steering Committee held four
community meetings with a combined total of 94 citizens attending these meetings. The purpose
of the meetings was to familiarize the residents of the subareas with the planning process, as well
as the public participation tools that would be used to involve the public in plan development.
Citizens who attended the meetings also helped to identify and summarize the planning
conditions and concerns that are important to the future of each subarea of Currituck County.

Committee members and citizens who participated in the meetings identified the most pressing
land use issues or concerns facing each subarea. Beginning with the community meeting in
Knotts Island, participants were asked to focus their comments around the Coastal Resources
Commission’s management topics. The management topics are categories of local land use and
development policies determined by the CRC to be essential for proper use, development and
protection of natural and manmade resources in the coastal area. The management topics include
public access, land use compatibility, infrastructure carrying capacity, natural hazard areas, water
quality and local areas of concern.

Following the identification of issues that should be the focus of the Land Use Plan, participants
were asked to vote on the most important issues. The results of the citizens’ comments are
summarized below. Appendix C contains a complete list of issues identified during these
meetings and the number of votes each issue received.
Dominant Factors Effecting Growth Countywide
Over the last three decades Currituck County has experienced a phenomenal increase in
population, which is expected to continue into the next century. In 2004, Currituck was ranked
the second fastest growing county of the 100 counties in North Carolina and the 54th fastest
growing county in the country. County building permits for single-family homes have been
exceeding 600 per year over the last three years. Countywide this growth is attributable to several
factors including close proximity to the metropolitan area of Hampton Roads Virginia and Dare
County, low taxes and housing costs, a high quality of life, excellent schools and an abundance of
desirable shoreline property. These factors are described in more detail for each subarea below.
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
1-2
Mainland (Subarea 1)
This is the largest subarea of the County and extends from the Virginia line south to Point Harbor
and from Camden County to North Landing River (See Map 0.1). The dominant growth related
concerns for this area include the conversion of farmland to residential development and the
associated challenge of expanding infrastructure to support this conversion. In addition, and as
the Soil Suitability Map (See Map 3.2) shows, most of the Mainland has “severe limitations” for
on-site septic systems. Due to the lack of central wastewater treatment facilities to serve this area,
coupled with the huge economic pressure for development, threats to adjacent water quality and
groundwater may become more pronounced in the future.

Adding to this concern is the availability of potable water to serve these new developments.
Currently the County is producing one million gpd at its mainland plant located in Maple.
However, due to higher demands, it has been purchasing 200,000 gpd since 2000 from Camden
County. Because of this, Currituck is now exploring reverse osmosis (R.O.) technology to meet
the projected demands created by expanding residential and commercial land uses. This treatment
process will require a discharge permit for the residual R.O. brine.

Although County development regulations are considered to be extremely strong, stormwater
management concerns have been escalating as impervious surfaces and associated run-off have
increased. For the Mainland, these concerns focus mostly on the abandonment and filling in of
relic as well as functioning farm ditches to accommodate new development. Moreover, highly
engineered stormwater management plans are being proposed to meet county requirements while
existing, yet less sophisticated, systems are not being well maintained.

An additional Mainland concern is the Mid-Currituck Sound Bridge. As conditions exist today
without this bridge, weekend traffic backs up as far north as Grandy on US- 158 “imprisoning”
residents within their homes until the weekday. This has a devastating effect on the quality of life,
the ability to deliver emergency services, the local economy and the ambient air quality of the
area. A recent NCDOT study found that a bridge is not necessary if certain widening projects
occur on US 158 and NC 12. Proponents of the bridge believe that it is very much needed to
improve east-west travel, enhance economic development, and provide better delivery of services
to the Currituck Outer Banks. This continues to be a major issue both for the Mainland and the
Outer Banks beaches.

Two meetings were held on the mainland during the issue identification stage of plan
development. The first meeting was held on November 24, 2003, at the Old Historic Courthouse
in Currituck, for residents and property owners from the upper portion of the mainland. Major
concerns identified at the upper mainland meeting include the following:
• Open space and rural areas are important to the quality of life in Currituck County
• Currituck County should continue to examine and consider the purchase of development
rights
• Citizens are satisfied with the level of environmental protection provided by state and
county regulations
• More economic development activity is desired to improve or generate additional
revenue and improve the economy of the area
• Drainage issues are a concern that needs to be addressed
• Citizens are concerned with the loss of farmland caused by development pressures
• Maintaining the traditional way-of-life is important to long-time residents
• Additional street lights and sidewalks are desired
• Equal levels of fire protection should be provided throughout the County
Section 1: Community Concerns and Aspirations
1-3

A second issue identification meeting was held for residents and property owners of the lower
mainland area at Griggs Elementary School on January 26, 2004. Citizen comments revolved
around six land use plan management topics and are summarized below:
Public Water Access
• Citizens are primarily in favor of additional public water access
• A land-banking plan for acquisition of waterfront property / access facilities throughout
the County is favored
Natural Hazards
• The proposed mid-County bridge is needed to assist in hurricane evacuations
• Control of drainage problems associated with storm events needs to be coordinated with
the NC Department of Transportation (NCDOT) and Currituck County
Infrastructure Carrying Capacity
• The mid-County bridge is needed to alleviate traffic congestion in the southern part of the
County
• The County’s water system needs improvements to provide sufficient fire suppression
capability
Land Use Compatibility
• Construction of commercial buildings should be regulated by aesthetics/architectural
design standards and restrictive covenants
• The appearance of the Highway 158/168 corridor needs improvement; suggestions
include reducing the number of billboards and increasing landscape buffers
Water Quality
• The ban on discharge into non-ocean surface waters should be continued to protect water
quality
Local Areas of Concern
• The County needs the proposed mid-County bridge
• A police/sheriff substation is needed in the southern part of the County
Knotts Island (Subarea 2)
Knotts Island represents the smallest subarea of the County. Infrastructure related concerns and
increased density pressures from the Hampton Roads area represent the dominant issues for the
residents. Having no central water or sewer system (and no future desire for such), a very high
seasonal water table, limited access and extensive wetlands on the western half of the island all
argue for the need for large lot zoning of this area. Currently, the minimum lot size is 3 acres;
however exceptions to this zoning rule allow up to five 40,000 square foot lots to be subdivided
from the parent parcel.

Residents have mixed feeling about large lot zoning and the desire to subdivide an acre as a gift
for family members. In addition, issues concerning the preservation of the small town rural
character and the protection of the natural environment are foremost in residents’ minds as
pressure for more residential development continues.
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
1-4

A community meeting was held at Knotts Island Elementary School on January 20, 2004. Major
concerns for Knotts Island identified at this meeting revolved around the Land Use Plan
management topics and are summarized below:
Public Water Access
• Public water access on Knotts Island is adequate, with the exception of the need for
additional parking at some sites, especially those on Cason Point Road and Brumley
Road
• There is little support for developing additional water access sites on Knotts Island
(However it should be noted that the Land Use and Development Policies 2005 Citizen
Opinion Survey conducted by Eastern Carolina University indicated support for
additional public water access)
Natural Hazards
• Improved public communications from the County’s public information office to
residents following hurricanes and other disasters is needed
• Disaster-related communications could be facilitated by the establishment of an
information phone line for Knotts Island residents
Infrastructure Carrying Capacity
• Road maintenance and drainage improvements are greatly needed; residents encouraged
better coordination with the NCDOT regarding roadside ditch maintenance
• A paid fire department and improved fire rating (for insurance purposes) are needed
Land Use Compatibility
• Residents strongly support a minimum three-acre lot size for Knotts Island
• Many residents do not support cluster developments
• Caps on mobile home parks are needed
Water Quality
• Reduce building density to protect and improve water quality.
• Initiate a water-testing program
Local Areas of Concern
Residents identified the need for additional County services on Knotts Island, including a public
library, additional recreation programs, and trash collection.
Outer Banks Beaches (Subarea 3)
The tremendous increase in the value and demand for beach property fueled by investment
interests is rapidly changing the unique character that distinguishes this community from other
“Beach Towns”. As described earlier, this subarea can be further divided into the areas of Corolla
and Carova.
Corolla
Although this section of the beach is approximately 82% built out, there are a variety of growth
related issues that Corolla continues to struggle with, including the following:
• Large Houses – The demand for bigger homes with more bedrooms and amenities is a
Section 1: Community Concerns and Aspirations
1-5
major concern both in terms of the loss of the natural environment and the associated
stress it places on the infrastructure.
• Stormwater – Especially in the older subdivisions such as Whalehead, stormwater
management problems are becoming more pronounced as larger houses consume more
natural infiltration areas and create greater impervious surfaces. Without outfalls or large
detention basins, stormwater has flooded low-lying homes and streets. Emergency
pumping of this water to the ocean has been approved twice by the Division of Water
Quality in the last four years. Efforts have been made to create a solution to this growing
concern.
• Mid Currituck Sound Bridge – As mentioned earlier, this major transportation
improvement has been a divisive issue and will certainly change the pace if not the
character of development both on the Mainland and the beach.
Carova
Only 19% of this portion of the beach is built out principally because of the lack of improved
roads to access this section of the Outer Banks. Much as of this land area has been subdivided
into substandard sized lots prior to the County’s adoption of the a subdivision ordinance.
Extensive wetlands and natural habitat areas characterize much of this area with an abundance of
wildlife and maritime forests.

Even with no improved roads, this area is also struggling with the same growth related concerns
that Corolla is experiencing. In addition, this portion of the beach has been designated by
Congress as a Coastal Barrier Resource Act zone; this means that Federal grants and programs
are not available, including federal flood insurance. With small lots, minimum basic
infrastructure, and access only by four wheel drive vehicles, planning for growth in this section of
the subarea will be most challenging.

The issue identification meeting for the Outer Banks beaches was held on December 9, 2003, at
the Corolla Fire Department in the Whalehead Subdivision. Residents identified the following
issues or areas of concern:

• New development should not be approved without adequate infrastructure
• Additional public facilities are needed to improve quality of life for permanent residents
• Commercial uses on the beach should be centralized
• Transportation improvements are needed to facilitate ease of travel
• The number of very large houses and resulting seasonal population is stressing the
infrastructure of the area
• Issues with the four-wheel-drive beach road need to be addressed
• Adequate water service is needed
• Maintaining the cleanliness of the beach is important
LAND USE PLAN QUESTIONNAIRE
In addition to the numerous subarea meetings held throughout the County, the Planning Staff also
attempted to garner opinions from those property owners who were unable to attend these
meetings. This was done by posting a Land Use Plan Questionnaire on the County website from
October 2004 to March 2005. A total of 41 questionnaires were completed on-line and a summary
of the responses are provided below:

• The majority of respondents were non-resident property owners (73%).
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
1-6
• Open Space and the natural environment is what 71% said they liked most about the
County.
• “Travel/Access to Corolla” is what 42% said they liked least about the County followed
by “lack of local control or decision making” (33%).
• Concerning public access to the beach and to public trust waters, 76% said the County
“Has about the right number of accesses”.
• 63% indicated that the County land development regulations are “inadequate in
protecting the environment”.
• Reducing the risk of natural hazards such as hurricanes and nor’easters, 38% felt the
county was doing a “fair job” while 33% “Don’t know”.
• In terms of protecting water quality, most thought the County development regulations
were adequate with an average rating of “5” on a scale of 1 to 10.
• The most important issue facing the County in the next 5 years is “Over population”
(36%) followed by the “Northern Bridge” with 33%.
• Lastly, 46% expressed a desire for the County to “limit development” when asked if there
are any other comments you would like to make.

These survey results appear to support the views of those in attendance at the subarea meetings on
similar but not identical issues. In addition, the proposed policy statements identified by the
Steering Committee address most if not all the concerns raised in this website questionnaire.
VISION STATEMENT
In conjunction with public participation, the Vision Statement for Currituck County was
developed by the Land Use Plan Steering Committee. The purpose of the Vision Statement is to
provide the foundation for setting priorities, defining goals and developing land use policies to
achieve local government goals. The following is Currituck County’s Planning Vision:

Having been entrusted by the Currituck County Board of Commissioners to assist
in the development of a comprehensive Land Use Plan (LUP) that fulfills the
specific requirements of the CAMA Land Use Plan Guidelines and Coastal
Resources Commission (CRC) certification, and having been entrusted to oversee
the preparation of the LUP, including the advisement and coordination of the
plan development based upon each subarea ’s special environment and its socio-
economic requirements, as well as the stated expectations of citizens and
property owners, we the Currituck County Land Use Plan Steering Committee
submit the following Community Vision Statement:

We want to protect our vital land and water natural resources and preserve
farmland and open spaces while building a thriving and sustainable local
economy.

We will strive to maintain and enhance the quality of life within our communities
for present and future generations by providing:

• economic opportunities and affordable housing for all citizens
• quality schools and educational, health and safety services
• additional and enhanced recreational facilities
• sound transportation planning and water, waste, and stormwater services for a
growing population
• an aesthetically pleasing environment
Section 1: Community Concerns and Aspirations
1-7

We value open and honest communication with all residents and property owners
and continuing opportunities for public involvement in the development,
implementation and updates of the Land Use Plan.

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

2-1
Section 2: Population, Housing and Economy
SECTION 2: POPULATION, HOUSING AND ECONOMY
POPULATION
Information on Currituck County’s permanent and seasonal population and the degree to which it
will change during the planning period is an important component of the land use planning
process. Population analysis can help identify growth areas, as well as the amount of land that
should be allocated for future uses. Population trend analysis provides information on expected
impacts on the area’s natural resources and future infrastructure needs. Population age and
income characteristics help estimate demands for different types of housing and related land use,
as well as special needs of the community. Appendix D provides an explanation of demographic
and population statistics and how they are compiled.
County Growth Relative to Other NC Counties, Including Coastal Counties
Eighteen of the twenty North Carolina counties regulated by the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA), including Currituck County, experienced a net permanent population growth from 1990
to 2000. During this period, only two coastal counties lost population (Bertie and Washington
Counties). Currituck was the fourth fastest growing county of the CAMA counties and number
eleven in growth of the 100 counties in North Carolina (Table 2.1).

Among the CAMA counties, the highest rates of permanent population growth from 1990 through
2000 have occurred in oceanfront counties including Brunswick, Currituck, Dare, New Hanover,
and Pender (Table 2.1).

Table 2.1 Total Population and Percent Change for North Carolina
Counties (CAMA Regulated Counties in gray)
COUNTY Year Percent Change
1980 1990 2000 1980-1990 1990-2000
JOHNSTON 70,599 81,306 121,942 15.2% 50.0%
WAKE 301,429 426,301 627,847 41.4% 47.3%
HOKE 20,383 22,856 33,646 12.1% 47.2%
UNION 70,436 84,210 123,671 19.6% 46.9%
BRUNSWICK 35,777 50,985 73,143 42.5% 43.5%
PENDER 22,262 28,855 41,082 29.6% 42.4%
MECKLENBURG 404,270 511,481 695,471 26.5% 36.0%
HARNETT 59,570 67,833 91,025 13.9% 34.2%
NEW HANOVER 103,471 120,284 160,327 16.2% 33.3%
CABARRUS 85,895 98,935 131,063 15.2% 32.5%
CURRITUCK 11,089 13,736 18,190 23.9% 32.4%
IREDELL 82,538 92,935 122,660 12.6% 32.0%
DARE 13,377 22,746 29,967 70.0% 31.7%
FRANKLIN 30,055 36,414 47,260 21.2% 29.8%
HENDERSON 58,617 69,326 89,193 18.3% 28.7%
CHATHAM 33,415 38,759 49,329 16.0% 27.3%
SAMPSON 49,687 47,297 60,161 -4.8% 27.2%
POLK 12,984 14,416 18,324 11.0% 27.1%
MACON 20,178 23,499 29,811 16.5% 26.9%
LINCOLN 42,372 50,319 63,780 18.8% 26.8%
MOORE 50,505 59,000 74,769 16.8% 26.7%
GRANVILLE 34,043 38,341 48,498 12.6% 26.5%
DAVIE 24,599 27,859 34,835 13.3% 25.0%
JACKSON 25,811 26,846 33,121 4.0% 23.4%
PITT 90,146 108,480 133,813 20.3% 23.4%
GREENE 16,117 15,384 18,974 -4.5% 23.3%
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
2-2
Table 2.1 Continued Total Population and Percent Change for
North Carolina Counties (CAMA Regulated Counties in gray)
COUNTY Year Percent Change
1980 1990 2000 1980-1990-2000
ORANGE 77,055 93,851 115,537 21.8% 23.1%
DURHAM 152,235 181,854 223,314 19.5% 22.8%
DUPLIN 40,952 39,995 49,063 -2.3% 22.7%
CLAY 6,619 7,155 8,775 8.1% 22.6%
RANDOLPH 91,300 106,546 130,471 16.7% 22.5%
ALEXANDER 24,999 27,544 33,603 10.2% 22.0%
GUILFORD 317,154 347,420 421,048 9.5% 21.2%
ALAMANCE 99,319 108,213 130,794 9.0% 20.9%
CHEROKEE 18,933 20,170 24,298 6.5% 20.5%
STOKES 33,086 37,223 44,711 12.5% 20.1%
CATAWBA 105,208 118,412 141,686 12.6% 19.7%
YADKIN 28,439 30,488 36,348 7.2% 19.2%
LEE 36,718 41,370 49,208 12.7% 18.9%
MCDOWELL 35,135 35,681 42,151 1.6% 18.1%
BUNCOMBE 160,897 174,778 206,310 8.6% 18.0%
PERSON 29,164 30,180 35,623 3.5% 18.0%
ROWAN 99,186 110,605 130,340 11.5% 17.8%
BURKE 72,504 75,740 89,145 4.5% 17.7%
ROBESON 101,610 105,170 123,245 3.5% 17.2%
CAMDEN 5,829 5,904 6,885 1.3% 16.6%
DAVIDSON 113,162 126,677 147,246 11.9% 16.2%
MADISON 16,827 16,953 19,635 0.7% 15.8%
WARREN 16,232 17,265 19,972 6.4% 15.7%
WATAUGA 31,666 36,952 42,695 16.7% 15.5%
AVERY 14,409 14,867 17,167 3.2% 15.5%
SURRY 59,449 61,704 71,219 3.8% 15.4%
YANCEY 14,934 15,419 17,774 3.2% 15.3%
FORSYTH 243,704 265,878 306,06 9.1% 15.1%
HAYWOOD 46,495 46,942 54,033 1.0% 15.1%
SWAIN 10,283 11,268 12,968 9.6% 15.1%
TRANSYLVANIA 23,417 25,520 29,334 9.0% 14.9%
MONTGOMERY 22,469 23,352 26,822 3.9% 14.9%
NASH 67,153 76,677 87,420 14.2% 14.0%
PAMLICO 10,398.0 11,368.0 12,934.9.3% 13.8%
CLEVELAND 83,435 84,713 96,290 1.5% 13.7%
CASWELL 20,705 20,693 23,501 -0.1% 13.6%
GATES 8,875 9,305 10,516 4.8% 13.0%
CARTERET 41,092 52,553 59,383 27.9% 13.0%
BLADEN 30,491 28,663 32,278 -6.0% 12.6%
STANLY 48,517 51,765 58,100 6.7% 12.2%
CRAVEN 71,043 81,613 91,436 14.9% 12.0%
WILSON 63,132 66,061 73,814 4.6% 11.7%
PASQUOTANK 28,462 31,298 34,897 10.0% 11.5%
ALLEGHANY 9,587 9,590 10,677 0.0% 11.3%
GRAHAM 7,217 7,196 7,993 -0.3% 11.1%
RUTHERFORD 53,787 56,919 62,899 5.8% 10.5%
JONES 9,705 9,414 10,403 -3.0% 10.5%
WILKES 58,657 59,393 65,632 1.3% 10.5%
VANCE 36,748 38,892 42,954 5.8% 10.4%
COLUMBUS 51,037 49,587 54,749 -2.8% 10.4%
CUMBERLAND 247,160 274,713 302,96 11.1% 10.3%
CALDWELL * 67,746 70,709 77,708 4.4% 9.9%
ASHE 22,325 22,209 24,384 -0.5% 9.8%
PERQUIMANS 9,486 10,447 11,368 10.1% 8.8%

2-3
Section 2: Population, Housing and Economy
Table 2.1 Continued Total Population and Percent Change
for North Carolina Counties (CAMA Regulated Counties
in gray)
COUNTY Year Percent Change
1980 1990 2000 1980-1990-2000
GASTON 162,568 175,093 190,362 7.7% 8.7%
MITCHELL 14,428 14,433 15,687 0.0% 8.7%
WAYNE 97,054 104,666 113,329 7.8% 8.3%
ANSON 25,649 23,474 25,275 -8.5% 7.7%
HYDE 5,873 5,411 5,826 -7.9% 7.7%
TYRRELL 3,975 3,856 4,149 -3.0% 7.6%
ROCKINGHAM 83,426 86,064 91,928 3.2% 6.8%
SCOTLAND 32,273 33,763 35,998 4.6% 6.6%
BEAUFORT 40,355 42,283 44,958 4.8% 6.3%
NORTHAMPTON 22,195 20,798 22,086 -6.3% 6.2%
CHOWAN 12,558 13,506 14,150 7.5% 4.8%
RICHMOND 45,161 44,518 46,564 -1.4% 4.6%
LENOIR 59,819 57,274 59,614 -4.3% 4.1%
HALIFAX 55,076 55,516 57,370 0.8% 3.3%
HERTFORD 23,368 22,523 22,977 -3.6% 2.0%
MARTIN 25,948 25,078 25,554 -3.4% 1.9%
ONSLOW 112,784 149,838 150,355 32.9% 0.3%
EDGECOMBE 55,988 56,692 55,606 1.3% -1.9%
WASHINGTON 14,801 13,997 13,723 -5.4% -2.0%
BERTIE 21,024 20,388 19,763 -3.0% -3.1%
North Carolina 5,880,095 6,632,448 8,048,962 12.8% 21.4%
Source: NC State Data Center *Note 2000 population for Caldwell County (and,
hence, North Carolina) contains an unofficial census correction.
Currituck County Relative to Its Metropolitan Statistical Area
Currituck County is part of the Norfolk-Virginia Beach-Newport News Metropolitan Statistical
Area (MSA) and is one of ten counties in Region R. Population has increased in Region R and the
MSA since 1970 but the growth rate in Currituck County has been at much greater. This was
especially true from 1970 to 1980 when the County experienced 59% growth. From 1990 to 2000
the growth rate was twice as high in the county as Region R and almost 4 times greater than the
MSA (Table 2.2).

Table 2.2 Population and Percent Change for Currituck County, Norfolk-VA Beach-
Newport News MSA and Region R
Place Year Percent Growth
1970 1980 1990 2000 1970-1980 1980-1990 1990-2000
Currituck County 6,976 11,089 13,736 18,190 59.0% 23.9% 32.4%
MSA 1,056,027 1,200,998 1,443,244 1,569,54
1
13.7% 20.2% 8.8%
Region R 97,302 114,325 130,206 149,671 17.5% 13.9% 14.9%
Source: US Census
Geographic Distribution of Growth
The Currituck County subareas have had different growth trends over the past 30 years. Subarea
1, the mainland, accounts for majority of the county’s population. The growth rate was over 58%
from 1970-1980. Growth slowed during the 80s but increased again to over 31% from 1990 to
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
2-4
2000. Growth is attributed to the popularity of the mainland for commuters to Dare County and
the metropolitan area of southeastern Virginia.

The population in subarea 2, Knotts Island, has almost tripled in size between 1970 and 2000 with
the largest growth occurring between 1980 and 1990. The growth rate from 1990-2000 was
similar to the rate on the mainland. Subarea 3, the Outer Banks, tripled its population between
1970 and 1980. Of the three subareas, the Outer Banks is the only one that experienced negative
growth at some point since 1970. The period of negative growth occurred between 1980 and
1990. The growth rate then increased to 80% from 1990-2000, which is much higher than the
growth rate on the mainland and Knotts Island. A reason for the overall growth increase is the
national trend of population movement toward the coast. Although the growth rate on the Outer
Banks is much higher than the mainland, the Outer Banks population only accounts for a fraction
of the overall county population. Table 2.3 shows population changes for the County’s subareas
from 1970 to 2000.

Table 2.3 Total Population and Percent Change for Currituck County and Subareas
Year Percent Growth
Subarea 1970 1980 1990 2000 1970-1980 1980-1990 1990-2000
1 - Mainland 6407 10144 12324 16152 58.3% 21.5% 31.1%
2 - Knotts Island 457 519 1052 1390 13.6% 102.7% 32.1%
3 - Outer Banks 112 426 360 648 280.4% -15.5% 80.0%
Total 6976 11089 13736 18190 59.0% 23.9% 32.4%
Source: 1990 and 2000: DP-1 General Population and Housing Characteristics US Census Source: 1970
and 1980 Census Boundaries/Population NCCGIA
Population Age Characteristics
An analysis of population broken down by age provides insight into the population trends that
affect Currituck County. This data provides valuable information for use in projecting
infrastructure, service, housing, and other special needs of the County, as well as land use needs.

Approximately 54% of the population on the mainland was between the ages of 20 and 59 in
1990. This percentage increased slightly to 55.5% in 2000. Although the percent of the
population under 5 decreased by 1% from 1990 to 2000, the percent of the school age (5 to 19)
population increased by 0.7%. The percent of the population over 60 years old decreased from
17.8% in 1990 to 16.7% in 2000. These trends indicate a stable population. The population is
increasing over time and across population groups. No groups are experiencing significant
increases or decreases. Table 2.4 shows the break down by age of the mainland population.

2-5
Section 2: Population, Housing and Economy
Table 2.4 Mainland Population by Age Group
1- Mainland
Age 1990 % population 2000 % population
under 5 899 7.3% 1,012 6.3%
5-9 881 7.1% 1,1206.9%
10-14 879 7.1% 1,289 8.0%
15-19 809 6.6% 1,073 6.6%
20-29 1,709 13.9% 1,659 10.3%
30-39 2,149 17.4% 2,583 16.0%
40-49 1,614 13.1% 2,716 16.8%
50-59 1,193 9.7% 1,996 12.4%
60-69 1,1849.6% 1,344 8.3%
70-79 722 5.9% 912 5.6%
80+ 285 2.3% 448 2.8%
Total 12,324 16,152
Source: US Census QT-P1Age Groups and Sex

Approximately 55% of the population on Knotts Island was between the ages of 20 and 59 in
1990. This percentage increased slightly to 57.2% in 2000. Although the percent of the
population under 5 decreased by 3.7% from 1990 to 2000, the percent of the school age (5 to 19)
population increased by 3%. The percent of the population over 60 years old decreased from
15.6% in 1990 to 13.9% in 2000. As on the mainland, these trends indicate a stable population.
The population is increasing over time and across population groups. No groups are experiencing
significant increases or decreases. Table 2.5 shows the break down by age of the Knotts Island
population.
Table 2.5 Knotts Island Population by Age Group
2 - Knotts Island
Age 1990 % population 2000 % population
under 5 91 8.7% 69 5.0%
5-9 85 8.1% 110 7.9%
10-14 65 6.2% 124 8.9%
15-19 69 6.6% 98 7.1%
20-29 148 14.1% 131 9.4%
30-39 199 18.9% 229 16.5%
40-49 141 13.4% 255 18.3%
50-59 90 8.6% 181 13.0%
60-69 88 8.4% 98 7.1%
70-79 60 5.7% 67 4.8%
80+ 16 1.5% 28 2.0%
Total 1,052 1,390
Source: US Census QT-P1 Age Groups and Sex

On the Outer Banks persons over 60 years old made up 13.6% of the population in 1990. This
number doubled to 27.3% of the population in 2000. Coastal areas, such as the Outer Banks, are
popular retirement locations. Immigration and population aging account for the increase. This
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
2-6
trend has significant implications for housing, transportation, medical care and other personal and
professional services. The younger working group population (20-39) accounted for 25.6% of the
population in 1990 but fell to 17.7% in 2000. The decline may reflect high real estate prices and a
lack of year round permanent employment resulting in the emigration of the younger working
group population. A direct link with this decline is the decrease in the school age (5 to 19)
percentage of the population. It has decreased from 18.1% of the total population in 1990 to 9.3%
in 2000. These trends have implications for economic development planning, schools and other
services. Table 2.6 shows the breakdown of the Outer Banks population by age group.

Table 2.6 Outer Banks Population by Age Group
3 - Outer Banks
Age 1990 % population 2000 % population
under 5 12 3.3% 20 3.1%
5-9 15 4.2% 18 2.8%
10-14 22 6.1% 22 3.4%
15-19 28 7.8% 20 3.1%
20-29 45 12.5% 46 7.1%
30-39 47 13.1% 69 10.6%
40-49 72 20.0% 105 16.2%
50-59 70 19.4% 171 26.4%
60-69 43 11.9% 134 20.7%
70-79 5 1.4% 39 6.0%
80+ 1 0.3% 4 0.6%
Total 360 648
Source: US Census QT-P1 Age Groups and Sex
State Estimates and Projections of Population Change
Population projections prepared by the State of North Carolina show an increasing growth rate for
the total population until 2015 (See Table 2.7 below). From 2015 to 2030 the growth rate begins
to decrease. The age group with the greatest growth rates for the 28-year time frame is the 60-69
group from 2002 until 2015. The growth rate is high for the 50-59 group until 2015 when
negative growth rates appear. The growth rate for the 70 and up age group increases over time.
This trend of increasing growth rates in the above 50 population has implications for economic
growth and planning throughout the county.

Table 2.7 Projected Populations by Age Group and Percent Change
Age Population by Age Percent
2002 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 '02-'05 '05-'10 '10-'15 '15-'20 '20-'25 '25-
0-4 1,234 1,291 1,377 1,508 1,623 1,712 1,804 4.62 6.66 9.51 7.63 5.48 5.37
5-19 4,104 4,060 4,365 4,551 5,017 5,271 5,684 -1.07 7.51 4.26 10.24 5.06 7.84
20-29 2,027 2,366 2,557 2,993 2,881 3,242 3,272 16.72 8.07 17.05 -3.74 12.53 0.93
30-39 2,852 2,717 2,830 3,103 3,547 3,737 3,871 -4.73 4.16 9.65 14.31 5.36 3.59
40-49 3,482 3,626 3,558 3,450 3,522 3,852 4,230 4.14 -1.88 -3.04 2.09 9.37 9.81
50-59 2,563 2,900 3,557 4,063 4,046 3,942 4,037 13.15 22.66 14.23 -0.42 -2.57 2.41
60-69 1,744 1,990 2,503 2,951 3,630 4,059 4,112 14.11 25.78 17.90 23.01 11.82 1.31
70 & up 1,626 1,641 1,897 2,298 2,860 3,473 4,337 0.92 15.60 21.14 24.46 21.43 24.88
Total 19,632 20,591 22,644 24,917 27,126 29,288 31,34
7
4.88 9.97 10.04 8.87 7.97 7.03
Source: State Agency Data: Ofice of the Governor (projections)

2-7
Section 2: Population, Housing and Economy
Additional Population Growth Scenarios
In reviewing the above State population growth projections, the Currituck County Planning
Department has concluded that these estimates may significantly understate potential growth.
This is because such projections were based on 1990s growth trends that do not take into account
the accelerated growth of the late 1990’s and early 2000’s. For this reason, two other growth
scenarios have been developed.

As a baseline for these projections, the County relied on the Currituck County School Facilities
Needs Analysis and Long-Range Improvement Plan, authored by PMA Planners (October 2004).
This study determined that the County population in 2005 would be 22,500, based on the actual
rate of building permit activity over the preceding five years. This population number was then
used as the baseline for projecting the following "Medium and "High Growth" scenarios.
Medium Growth Scenario
The medium growth scenario was established by computing a trend line from 1970 through 2005
using the U.S. Census data for the years 1970-2000; the State’s estimates for the mid-census
years 1975-1995 and the PMA Planners estimate for 2005 as described above. The trend line for
this scenario is exponential, which more nearly represents the residential growth curve in
Currituck County over this period.
High-Growth Scenario
The high-growth scenario also uses an exponential trend line, but it is computed using a shorter
time span, specifically, Census and State figures from 1990 through 2000 and PMA's estimate for
2005. The basic difference between the medium growth trend line and high-growth trend line is
that the high-growth scenario puts more emphasis on recent growth activity. Staff believes that
the medium growth and high growth scenarios more accurately represent the future population
growth of the County over the next 10 and 20 years. The results of all three growth projections
are given in Table 2.8 following.

Table 2.8 Projected Year Round Population Growth 2000-2025
Year Low Growth Medium Growth High-Growth
2000 18,190 18,190 18,190
2005 20,591 22,500 22,500
2010 22,644 24,589 26,154
2015 24,917 28,142 30,376
2020 27,126 32,330 35,800
2025 29,288 36,800 41,400
Peak Season Population Estimates
Like other coastal communities, the summer season marks a dramatic increase in the population
of Currituck County. On the Mainland, a variety of campgrounds, rental homes, and tents, as well
as a limited number bed and breakfast rooms, are available. On the Outer Banks, rental houses
dominate, supplemented by a number of relatively new hotel accommodations. At the same time,
Knotts Island offers a small number of seasonal housing units, plus a fairly large number of
campsites. The specifics of these numbers are shown in Table 2.9 below.
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
2-8
Table 2.9 Currituck County's 2000 Peak Seasonal Population
Accommodations Units Occupancy/Unit Seasonal Population
MAINLAND1
Campground Spaces/Tents 410 3.8 1558
Motels/Bed and Breakfast 25 2 50
Seasonal Rental Homes2 659 6.7 4,415
OUTER BANKS
Seasonal Rental Homes 2,693 14.0 37,702
Motels/Bed and Breakfast 185 3.7 685
KNOTTS ISLAND
Seasonal Rental Homes 41 6.7 275
Campground Spaces/Tents 185 3.8 703
GUESTS IN YR ROUND
HOMES3
1650 4.0 6,600
Total Seasonal Counts 5,848 -- 51,988
Total Year Round Counts 18,190
TOTAL PEAK SEASON POP 70,178
* Currituck County Planning and Inspections Department

Note that, according to area Realtors, each rental unit on the Currituck Outer Banks during a
typical summer week is occupied by between 12 and 17 persons. For purposes of establishing a
seasonal population figure, it is estimated that each Outer Banks rental unit will average 14
persons. This high number is based on the growing size of "single family" homes constructed
over the past five years that have been averaging between 6 and 7 bedrooms per house. This trend
has been continuing with some rental homes exceeding 12 bedrooms and over 6,000 square feet
of heated space.

In all, it is estimated that the peak summer population in the year 2000 was 51,988. (Table 2.9)
When this figure is added to the year round population, the total estimated peak season population
was 70,178 for the year 2000.
Estimates of Future Peak Season Populations
Mainland and Knotts Island. Due to existing land use regulations prohibiting the creation of new
campgrounds as well as the expansion of old campgrounds, it is not expected that the number of
campground units on the Mainland will increase. However, seasonal housing units for summer
workers, especially in the southern Mainland area, will expand to fulfill the demand for
affordable housing opportunities not available on the Currituck or Dare County beaches.

Outer Banks. Looking at the past five years of Outer Banks building activity, it is estimated that
an average of 150 houses per year are added to the rental home inventory of the Currituck Outer
Banks. This means that during each 5-year period between 2000 and 2025, an additional 750
residential units will be available for rent in the Corolla and Carova areas.

1 Data for Campground Spaces/Tents and Motel and Bed and Breakfast Rooms came from the Currituck
County Chamber of Commerce Website.
2 Data on Seasonal Rental Homes for all 3 subareas came from Tables 2.11 through 2.13 below, US Census
2000. 3 This calculation assumes that at any given time during the peak summer season, about 15% of all year
round housing units in Currituck County have out of town house guests.

2-9
Section 2: Population, Housing and Economy

Combine the numbers for the Outer Banks area of the county with the smaller additions
to the seasonal housing market on the Mainland and Knotts Island, and add in guests staying with
year rounders, and it can be estimated that the seasonal population of the county will increase by
about 12,500 people every five years. With this information, the following numbers may be
calculated:

Table 2.10 Currituck County Estimated Total Population During Summer Season4
Year Seasonal
Population
Permanent
Population5
Total
2000 51,988 18,190 70,178
2005 64,488 22,500 86,988
2010 76,988 24,589 101,577
2015 87,488 28,142 115,630
2020 99,988 32,330 132,318
2025 112,488 36,800 149,288

Thus, by the year 2025, both the seasonal population and the year round population will have
more than doubled.
HOUSING
Housing Characteristics
On the mainland, housing stock increased by 26.7% between 1990 and 2000. The majority, 86%,
of the housing is occupied. Data from the year 2000 shows that owners reside in almost 77% of
the occupied housing units. This is a slight decrease from 1990 when owners resided in 80% of
the occupied housing units. The number of vacant units decreased by almost 8% as over 100
seasonal/rental units became unavailable between 1990 and 2000. Table 2.11 provides an
overview of the characteristics of the mainland’s housing.

Table 2.11 - Mainland, Currituck County Housing Characteristics
Statistics Year Percent Change
1990 2000 1990-2000
Total Housing Units 5,561 7,046 26.7%
Occupied Housing Units 4,484 6,052 3 5.0%
Owner Occupied 3,616 4,945 36.8%
Renter Occupied 868 1,107 27.5%
Vacant Units 1,077 994 -7.7%
Seasonal/Rental Units 768 659 -14.2%
Other Vacant* 309 335 8.4%
Source: 1990 - QT-H1 Occupancy, Tenure, and Age of Householder
Source: 2000 - QT-H1 General Housing Characteristics
* Vacant includes units for sale, rented or sold but unoccupied, for migratory workers and other

4 This estimate does not include “Day Trips” to the Outer Banks. Resulting estimates are based on the
“Medium Growth Scenario”. 5 Estimates of Permanent Population employ the "Medium Growth Scenario”.

Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
2-10

The housing stock on Knotts Island increased by almost 30% between 1990 and 2000. The
housing characteristics of Knotts Island are very similar to the mainland. Approximately 87% of
the housing units are occupied. As on the mainland, owners reside in the majority, 78%, of the
occupied housing units. This is also a slight decrease from 1990 when owners occupied 85%. The
number of seasonal/rental units decreased by 25.5% over the 10-year period. The number of
vacant houses not used as seasonal/rental units increased greatly from 15 units to 41. Table 2.12
provides an overview of the characteristics of the Knotts Island housing.

Table 2.12 - Knotts Island, Currituck County Housing Characteristics
Statistics Year Percent Change
1990 2000 1990-2000
Total Housing Units 476 618 29.8%
Occupied Housing Units 406 536 32.0%
Owner Occupied 308 417 3 5.4%
Renter Occupied 98 119 21.4%
Vacant Units 70 82 17.1%
Seasonal/Rental Units 55 41 -25.5%
Other Vacant* 15 41 173.3%
Source: 1990 - QT-H1 Occupancy, Tenure, and Age of Householder
Source: 2000 - QT-H1 General Housing Characteristics
* Vacant includes units for sale, rented or sold but unoccupied, for migratory workers and other

The Outer Banks housing stock increased between 1990 and 2000 from 1,330 to 3,023 units. This
is a 127.3% increase. Contrary to the Mainland and Knotts Island, the Outer Banks housing stock
is mainly seasonal/rental units. There are 2,693 units that account for 89% of the housing stock.
The number of seasonal/rental units grew by 140% between 1990 and 2000. There are 314
permanently occupied housing units of which the majority are owner occupied. The 112.2%
change in the number of occupied housing units from 1990 to 2000 parallels the 80% growth rate
in the permanent population.

Table 2.13 - Outer Banks, Currituck County Housing Characteristics
Statistics Year Percent Change
1990 2000 1990-2000
Total Housing Units 1,330 3,023 127.3%
Occupied Housing Units 148 314 112.2%
Owner Occupied 123 268 117.9%
Renter Occupied 25 46 84.0%
Vacant Units 1,182 2,709 129.2%
Seasonal/Rental Units 1,122 2,693 140.0%
Other Vacant* 60 16 -73.3%
Source: 1990 QT-H1 Occupancy, Tenure, and Age of Householder, 1990 Census
Source: 2000 QT-H1 General Housing Characteristics, 2000 Census
* Vacant includes units for sale, rented or sold but unoccupied, for migratory workers and other
Housing Types
Table 2.14 portrays the types of housing units that make up the Mainland’s housing stock. In
2000, the majority, or 68.2% of the housing consisted of single-family detached dwellings.

2-11
Section 2: Population, Housing and Economy
Mobile homes are the second largest type of housing at 29%.

Table 2.14 - Types of Housing Units Mainland, Currituck County
Occupied units in structure 1990 1990% 2000 2000%
Single-family detached 3,320 59.7% 4,787 68.2%
1 unit attached 24 0.4% 54 0.8%
2 to 4 units 42 0.8% 67 1.0%
5 to 9 units 16 0.3% 68 1.0%
10 to 19 units 2 0.0% 6 0.1%
More than 20 units 0 0.0% 5 0.1%
Mobile homes, trailer or other 2,157 38.8% 2,034 29.0%
Total housing units 5,561 7,021
Source: 1990 DP-1 Genearl Population and Housing U.S. Census Bureau
Source: 2000 DP-4 Profile of Selected Housing Characteristics - U.S. Census Bureau * Total
Housing Units 2000 are calculated from sample data and are estimates. For actual Total Housing
Units see Table 2.8

Table 2.15 portrays the types of housing units that make up the housing stock on Knotts Islands.
In 2000, the majority, or 53.6% of the housing consisted of single-family detached dwellings.
Mobile homes are the second largest type of housing at 31.9%.

Table 2.15 - Types of Housing Units Knotts Island, Currituck County
Occupied units in structure 1990 1990% 2000 2000%
Single-family detached 255 53.6% 414 65.7%
1 unit attached 2 0.4% 0 0.0%
2 to 4 units 2 0.4% 8 1.3%
5 to 9 units 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
10 to 19units 0 0.0% 7 1.1%
Mobile homes, trailer or other 217 45.6% 201 3 1.9%
Total housing units 476 630
Source: 1990 DP-1 Genearl Population and Housing U.S. Census Bureau
Source: 2000 DP-4 Profile of Selected Housing Characteristics - U.S. Census Bureau * Total Housing
Units 2000 are calculated from sample data and are estimates. For actual Total Housing Units see Table 2.9

Table 2.16 portrays the types of housing units that make up the housing stock on Outer Banks. In
2000, almost all, 93.1%, of the housing consisted of single-family detached dwellings. Almost
4% of the housing units are 1 unit attached.

Table 2.16 - Types of Housing Units Outer Banks, Currituck County
Occupied units in structure 1990 1990% 2000 2000%
Single-family detached 1,150 86.5% 2,826 93.1%
1 unit attached 58 4.4% 119 3.9%
2 to 4 units 24 1.8% 23 0.8%
5 to9 units10 0.8% 12 0.4%
10 to 19 units 35 2.6% 44 1.4%
Mobile homes, trailer or other 53 4.0% 12 0.4%
Total housing units 1,330 3,036
Source: 1990 DP-1 Genearl Population and Housing U.S. Census Bureau
Source: 2000 DP-4 Profile of Selected Housing Characteristics - U.S. Census Bureau * Total
Housing Units 2000 are calculated from sample data and are estimates. For actual Total Housing
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
2-12
Units see Table 2.10
Housing Age
Over 50% of the housing units on the mainland and Knotts Island were built after 1980. On the
Outer Banks, over 96% of the housing units were built after 1980. Since 1995 1,077 housing
units, 35% of the total, were built on the Outer Banks. Table 2.17 provides a summary of the age
of Currituck County’s housing stock.

Table 2.17 Housing Unit Age
Year Housing Unit Number of Housing Number of Housing Number of Housing
Built Units Mainland Units Knotts Island Units Outer banks
1999 to March 2000 186 23 147
1995 to 1998 1021 85 930
1990 to 1994 829 97 1,209
1980 to 1989 1694 117 640
1970 to 1979 1468 58 79
1960 to 1969 604 86 0
1940 to 1959 793 69 19
1939 or earlier 426 95 12
Total Housing Units 7021 630 3,036
Source: 2000 DP-4 Profile of Selected Housing Characteristics - U.S. Census Bureau * Total Housing
Units 2000 are calculated from sample data and are estimates. For actual Total Housing Units see Table
2.8, 2.9 and 2.10
Building Permits
Table 2.18 provides information on the number and type of building permits issued by Currituck
County since 1998. Approximately two thirds of the permits are issued to the mainland each year,
about one third to the Outer Banks and a small number to Knotts Island. On the mainland, the
number of permits for commercial structures and manufactured housing decreased between 1998
and 2003. The number of residential permits has grown each year since 1998. Building has
declined on Knotts Island. The number of permits issued per year has fallen every year starting at
24 in 1998 and ending with 11 in 2003. Building on the Outer Banks declined slightly during
1999 and 2000 but picked up again in 2001 and has continued to increase.

2-13
Section 2: Population, Housing and Economy
Table 2.18 Currituck County Building Permits
Statistics Percent Change
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03
Mainland Total 364 368 309 343 433 482 1.1% -16.0% 11.0% 26.2% 11.3%
Single Family 155 142 160 198 306 359 -8.4% 12.7% 23.8% 54.5% 17.3%
Multi Family 0 10 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA NA NA
Manufacturedhousing 136 116 95 113 91 95 -14.7% -18.1% 18.9% -19.5% 4.4%
Commercial 73 100 54 32 36 28 37.0% -46.0% -40.7% 12.5% -22.2%
Knotts Island Total 24 25 24 20 17 11 4.2% -4.0% -16.7% -15.0% -35.3%
Single Family 16 13 15 15 13 9 -18.8% 15.4% 0.0% -13.3% -30.8%
Multi Family 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA NA NA
Manufactured housing 6 8 9 4 4 2 33.3% 12.5% -55.6% 0.0% -50.0%
Commercial 2 4 0 1 0 0 100.0% -100.0% NA -100.0% NA
Outer Banks Total 227 200 178 196 201 202 -11.9% -11.0% 10.1% 2.6% 0.5%
Single Family 219 191 161 192 195 197 -12.8% -15.7% 19.3% 1.6% 1.0%
Multi Family 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA NA NA
Manufactured housing 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA NA NA
Commercial 8 9 17 4 6 5 12.5% 88.9% -76.5% 50.0% -16.7%
Currituck County Total 615 593 511 559 651 695 -3.6% -13.8% 9.4% 16.5% 6.8%
ECONOMY
Overview of Key Economic Indicators
Currituck County’s economy is strong and has been growing consistently over the last twenty
years. Retail sales have grown over 50% since 1998. Retail sales only grew 13.6% for the state
during the same time period (Table 2.19).

Table 2.19 Gross Retail Sales (in 1000’s)
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
NC $116,762,211 $126,253,339 $128,493,660 $132,176,353 $127,256,302 $132,682,106
Currituck $181,040 $197,588 $235,342 $264,097 $257,153 $278,447
Source: State Agency Data: Department of Revenue

The employed labor force saw a steady growth from 1998 to 2002 and the percent employed
remained constant at 97%. This was higher than the state employment rate during the same
period. Paralleling this employment growth, income in the county has increased significantly
since 1970 (Table 2.21).
Table 2.20 Employment Status by Place of Residence
Currituck North Carolina
Year Labor Force Employed Percent Labor Force Employed Percent
Employed Employed
1998 8,699 8,469 97.4% 3,798,193 3,667,122 96.5%
1999 8,908 8,704 97.7% 3,868,374 3,746,412 96.8%
2000 9,459 9,224 97.5% 4,145,152 3,995,484 96.4%
2001 10,026 9,765 97.4% 4,201,714 3,971,115 94.5%
2002 10,073 9,805 97.3% 4,171,462 3,890,025 93.3%
Source: State Agency Data: Department of Commerce
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
2-14
The cost of housing has paralleled the area’s growth in economic activity. The 2000 median
housing value in Currituck County was $115,500 compared to the state average of $108,300. The
median gross rent was $590 compared to the state average of $548. Despite the fact that the
county’s economy is growing significantly, and because the housing cost is only marginally
above the state average, Currituck County should not be considered exclusionary to low or
moderate-income persons. Key economic indicators for Currituck County are in Table 2.21.

Table 2.21 - Currituck County Key Economic Indicators
Statistics Years Percent Change
*Per capita income 1970 1980 1990 2000 1970-1980 1980-1990 1990-2000
Currituck County
North Carolina $2,094 $5,266 $12,630 $19,908 151 .5% 139.8% 57.6%
Total personal income ($1,000's) $2,492 $6,133 $12,885 $20,307 110.1% 110.1% 57.6%
Median family income $21,440 $87,011 $215,761 $459,860 305.8% 148.0% 113.1%
Median occupied housing value $6,428 $14,697 $31,422 $46,382 128.6% 113.8% 47.6%
Median gross rent** $8,500 $33,900 $78,900 $115,500 298.8% 132.7% 46.4%
$55 $222 $423 $590 303.6% 90.5% 39.5%
Source: 1980-2000 PCI - Federal Agency Data: Bureau of the Census - Census of Population and Housing,
obtained from LINC March 2004 *PCI is total money income per resident of the area, including young
children, elderly, and others who may not be earning money
Employment
The retail industry is the major employer in Currituck County. Other major industries include
construction, accommodation and food services and health care and social assistance.

Table 2.22 Currituck County Business Patterns
Industry Number of Employees
1998 1999 2000 2001
Forestry, fishing, hunting, and agriculture support * 0-19 0-19 *
Construction 311 356 434 406
Manufacturing 100 129 141 137
Wholesale Trade 61 91 103 98
Retail Trade 737 830 842 887
Transportation & warehousing 58 62 20-99 20-99
Information 0-19 0-19 56 20-99
Finance & insurance 20-99 49 20-99 51
Real Estate, rental & leasing 100-249 285 328 425
Professional, scientific & technical 20-99 57 115 90
Management of companies & enterprises 0-19 0-19 0-19 0-19
Admin., support, waste management, remediation 85 71 72 20-99
Health care & social assistance 219 180 212 205
Arts, entertainment & food services 125 143 171 159
Accomodation & food services 319 330 398 351
Other services (except public administration) 121 129 159 141
Unclassified establishments 2 6 7 1
Source: U.S.Census Bureau
Place of Employment
In 1984 only 29% of Currituck County’s labor force of 6,312 actually worked in the County for a
total of 1,838 jobs. According to the 2000 US Census 33% or 2,838 of this work force now works
within the County with a total work force of 8,603. Even with this increase there continues to be a
majority of workers commuting to the Hampton Roads Virginia area from Currituck County

2-15
Section 2: Population, Housing and Economy
(37%) with an additional 18% of the workers commuting to Dare County. (Table 2.22) These
statistics have implications for County revenues as numerous studies have shown in general
residential developments use more tax dollars in services such as schools, health, fire, etc. then it
provides in taxes. Conversely, agriculture, commercial, and industrial development usually pays
more tax dollars than services consumed. Therefore, for the financial health of the County, it is
important that Currituck continue the trend of increasing the number of jobs available within the
County.
Table 2.23 Workplace for Currituck County Labor Force
Sorted by Workplace County and State, 2000

Workplace State-County Name Count Percent
Brevard Co. FL 13 *
Broward Co. FL 6 *
Fulton Co. GA 8 *
Kane Co. IL 7 *
Prince George’s Co. MC 53 *
Somerset Co. MD 7 *
Bergen Co. NJ 9 *
New York Co. NY 4 *
Queens Co. NY 12 *
Camden Co. NC 59 *
Chowan Co. NC 36 *
Currituck Co. NC 2881 33.5
Dare Co. NC 1539 17.9
Edgecombe Co. NC 7 *
Herford Co. NC 6 *
Hoke Co. NC 8 *
Hyde Co. NC 9 *
Iredell Co. NC 7 *
Pasquotank Co. NC 428 5.0
Pender Co. NC 19 *
Perquimans Co. NC 11 *
Pitt Co. NC 7 *
Polk Co. NC 12 *
Sampson Co. NC 7 *
Tyrell Co. NC 7 *
Wake Co. NC 8 *
Washington Co. NC 6 *
Florence Co. SC 9 *
Sullivan Co. TN 6 *
Fairfax Co. VA 7 *
Henrico Co. VA 17 *
Charlottesville city VA 21 *
Cheasapeake city, VA 1270 14.5
Hampton city VA 10 *
Newport News city VA 31 *
Norfolk city VA 771 9.0
Portsmouth city VA 171 2.0
Richmond city VA 49 *
Suffolk city VA 33 *
Virginia Beach city VA 1032 12.0
TOTALS 8603
* All Other Workplaces 6.1
Source: US Census Bureau
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
2-16
Economy by Subarea
Mainland
When examining the 2002 NAICS Business Patterns for the Mainland of Currituck, (See Table
2.24) the largest numbers of employment sectors in descending order are: Construction with 99
businesses, followed by Retail Trade with 77 and lastly “Other Services” with a total of 40
centers. These places of business are also the largest employers however, they do not account for
government that includes military (Federal), State and County workers with an estimated 1,134
employees. (NC Dept. of Commerce – County Profiles – 2004)

Table 2.24 2002 NAICS BUSINESS PATTERNS BY ZIP CODE
Industry Code Description Corolla
Knotts
Island
Lower
Currituck
Upper
Currituck Totals
Total 110 16 208 197 531
Construction 9 6 65 34 114
Manufacturing 1 12 6 19
Wholesale trade 7 11 18
Retail trade 36 2 38 39 115
Transportation & warehousing 1 3 5 9
Information 1 4 4 9
Finance & insurance 2 2 5 9
Real estate & rental & leasing 20 14 10 44
Professional, scientific & technical services 3 10 15 28
Management of companies & enterprises 1 1
Admin, support, waste mgt, remediation services 3 1 9 6 19
Educational services 2 2
Health care and social assistance 1 4 14 19
Arts, entertainment & recreation 4 8 5 17
Accommodation & food services 26 2 14 9 51
Other services (except public administration) 4 3 15 25 47
Unclassified establishments 1 2 6 9
Source: US Census http://censtats. census.gov/cgi-bin/cbpnaic/cbpsect.pl
Lower Currituck - Aydlett, Grandy, Harbinger, Jarvisburg, Point Harbor, Popular Branch & Powells Point
Upper Currituck - Barco, Coinjock, Currituck, Maple, Moyock & Shawboro

The Mainland economy is distinctly different when comparing the Moyock in the north to Point
Harbor in the south. As mentioned earlier, the influence of Hampton Roads is creating a
commuting workforce which is most pronounced in the Moyock area. This is driven by the desire
to live in a rural environment with low taxes, good schools and high quality of life all of which
contribute to a “bedroom” style community. This desire has resulted in huge demands for
residential subdivisions, loss of prime agricultural farmland and more congestion on roadways
and most particularly NC-168.

The Point Harbor and southern part of the Mainland are also undergoing similar trends as the

2-17
Section 2: Population, Housing and Economy
availability of reasonably priced housing and land in Dare County becomes rare. In addition, for
those businesses requiring substantial amounts of land such as warehousing and manufacturing
operations, southern Currituck is quickly becoming the logical center for many beach-based
businesses. These demands for land are also propelling the loss of farmland as land prices soar
and farm revenues fall.

Lastly, mineral extraction and most particularly sand mining operations continue to play an
economic role in southern Currituck County. As of 2001 there were 18 active and inactive mining
sites (either gravel or sand) according to the Division of Land Quality, State Mining Division.
While the expansion of mining activities has had a positive effect on the local economy it is
important that they not have an adverse impact on the adjoining properties and the natural
environment.
Knotts Island
On the entire island there are only four (4) parcels of land designated as General Business
according to the Official County Zoning Map (2005). Like the northern Mainland, this subarea is
largely dependant on the economy of the Hampton Roads area with a commuting workforce
serving both commercial and governmental occupations.

The largest number of business establishments is in the field of Construction for a total of six.
(2002 NAICS Business Patterns). In terms of retail there are two stores (Sandy Point
Campgrounds and Knotts Island Market), two wineries and one active restaurant. Commercial
fishing and crabbing have historically been the focus of local economic activity and this continues
with some minor conflicts arising with growing residential neighborhoods. The new emerging
economy may focus more on agritourism (wineries and associated businesses) and retirees on
substantial but fixed incomes.
Outer Banks
Tourism is the economic engine for the Outer Banks. Of the 3,297 total seasonal housing units in
the County in the year 2000, 2,693 or 82% are located at the beach (Table 2.13). As shown in
table 2.10 the number of seasonal housing units has more than doubled when comparing 1990
units (1,122) to the 2000-year unit count (2,693) up 140%. The economic impact of tourism
countywide is shown I table 2.24. According to the 2002 NAICS Business Patterns, there are a
total of 110 business establishments at the beach. The largest number of these are in the Retail
sector (36) followed by Accommodation and Food Services (26) and Real Estate and Rental and
Leasing (20).

A major concern for the Corolla area is the over-commercialization of the community. Most of
the year-round residents and many of the cottage rental owners wish to minimize the amount of
land zoned for commercial purposes. This has principally been accomplished by limiting the
amount of commercially designated land in Planned Unit Developments (PUD’s). Of the seven
(7) existing PUD’s, six are restricted to a maximum of 10% of the land area for these uses while
one is limited to only 7%. Even with this limitation, most of the PUD’s have not yet utilized their
full allotment of commercial land. Moreover, some of these commercial uses may need to be re-
examined in terms of their appropriateness for a beach setting as well as the existing allowance
for “professional offices” in residential neighborhoods.

In the Carova area, due to the lack of paved roads and basic infrastructure, no commercially
zoned land exists. Recently in the Swan Beach community of Carova, a rezoning proposal has
been advanced along with a zoning text amendment to create a “Swan Beach Historic Overlay
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
2-18
District” for the purpose of allowing minimum commercial uses on parcels of 25 acres or larger.
Concerns about accessibility and the Federal Governments C.B.R.A. designation continue to be
obstacles to this proposal.
Tourism Impact
Much of the local economic activity in Currituck County is based on tourism. Restaurants,
accommodations, fishing, retail trade, services, construction, and the real estate and finance
industries benefit directly from the impact of tourism. In 2000, approximately 30.9% of all
housing in Currituck County was considered to be for seasonal or recreational use. This ranked
Currituck County fifth in North Carolina for the number of seasonal housing units. Table 2.25
shows the CAMA-regulated counties and their seasonal housing units in 2000.

Table 2.25 - 2000 Seasonal Housing Units Ranking
County Seasonal Housing Units
1 Brunswick County 15,540
2Dare County 13,355
3 Carteret County 13,333
4 New Hanover County 4,387
5 Currituck County 3,297
6 Onslow County 2,906
7 Pender County 2,881
8 Beaufort County 1,890
9 Pamlico County 903
10 Hyde County 666
11 Perquimans County 614
12 Craven County 433
13 Bertie County 354
14 Chowan County 337
15 Tyrrell County 246
16 Washington County 208
17 Pasquotank County 157
18 Hertford County 82
19 Gates County 72
20 Camden County 44
Source: 2000 - NC State Agency Data: Ofice of the Governor, obtained March 2004

The Currituck County tourism industry generated $99.82 million dollars in revenue and was
ranked 25th in the state in total revenue in 2003. The Currituck County tourism industry also
employed approximately 1,590 people and generated an annual payroll of $23.05 million in 2003,
up 8.5% from 2002. Table 2.26 shows the economic impact tourism has on Currituck County.

2-19
Section 2: Population, Housing and Economy
Table 2.26 - Tourism Impact in Currituck County
Payroll
($Millions)
Employment
($Thousands)
State Tax Receipts
($Millions)
Local Tax Receipts
($Millions)
2003 23.05 1.59 4.64 5.06
2002 21.25 1.48 4.21 4.57
2001 18.06 1.26 3.5 3.75
2000 17.24 1.22 3.41 3.68
1999 16.17 1.24 3.28 3.7
1998 15.16 1.17 2.68 2.76
1997 7.98 0.65 1.53 1.84
1996 8.22 0.74 1.67 1.94
1995 7 0.63 1.41 1.72
1994 6.75 0.62 1.31 1.65
1993 5.24 0.49 1.11 1.35
1992 3.41 0.29 0.76 1.14
1991 2.86 0.26 0.58 0.98
1990 2.59 0.21 0.49 0.97
Source: NC Department of Commerce Tourism - County by County Statistics, obtained September 2000

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
Section 3: Natural Systems Analysis
3-1
SECTION 3: NATURAL SYSTEMS ANALYSIS
INTRODUCTION
This section of the Land Use Plan provides a description of the natural features and
environmental conditions within Currituck County and an analysis of the suitability or limitation
of these features for development. The following requirements of the Coastal Resources
Commission’s Land Use Planning Guidelines [15A NCAC 7B] are addressed in this section:
• A summary of the inventory of the major natural features and an interpretation of the
capabilities or limitations that these features have for development;
• A composite map that shows the extent and overlap of environmental features in
Currituck County and the compatibility of these features for development; and
• An assessment of environmental conditions and trends with an emphasis on water
quality, natural hazards and natural resources.
NATURAL FEATURES INVENTORY
The inventory of natural systems addresses the following features and conditions:
• Areas of Environmental Concern (AECs)
• Soil characteristics
• Water quality classifications
• Primary nursery areas
• Flood and other natural hazard areas
• Storm surge areas
• Non-coastal wetlands
• Environmentally fragile areas
Areas of Environmental Concern (AECs)
Areas of Environmental Concern (AECs) are the foundation of the Coastal Resources
Commission’s (CRC) permitting program for coastal development. AECs are areas of natural
importance and are classified by the CRC. The purpose of the AEC classification is to protect
these areas from uncontrolled development, which may cause irreversible damage to property,
public health or the environment. Development within the designated Areas of Environmental
Concern is limited by CAMA regulations and minimum use standards. The CRC establishes
minimum standards to regulate development in AECs. However, a local government, through its
CAMA Land Use Plan, can establish development standards for AECs that are more stringent
than state standards.

In Currituck County there are two categories of AECs. These are the estuarine system AECs and
ocean hazard system AECs. Estuarine system AECs are made up of public trust areas, estuarine
waters, coastal shorelines and coastal wetlands. The ocean hazard system AECs consist of ocean
erodible areas and high hazard flood areas. The CRC has designated these AECs based on the
following descriptions contained in 1 5A NCAC 7H State Guidelines for Areas of Environmental
Concern.
Estuarine System AECs
Public trust areas are all waters of the Atlantic Ocean and the lands underneath, from the normal
high water mark on shore to the state’s official boundary three miles offshore; all navigable
natural water bodies and the lands underneath, to the normal high watermark on shore (a body of
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
3-2
water is considered navigable if you can float a canoe in it), not including privately owned lakes
where the public does not have access rights; all water in artificially created water bodies that
have significant public fishing resources and are accessible to the public from other waters; and
all waters in artificially created water bodies where the public has acquired rights by prescription,
custom, usage, dedication or any other means. Public trust areas often overlap with estuarine
waters.

Estuarine waters are the ocean, sounds, tidal rivers and their tributaries that stretch across coastal
North Carolina and link to other parts of the estuarine system: public trust areas, coastal wetlands
and coastal shorelines. For regulatory purposes, the inland/upstream boundary of estuarine waters
is the same line used to separate the jurisdictions of the NC Division of Marine Fisheries and the
NC Wildlife Resources Commission.

Coastal shorelines include all lands within 75 feet of the normal high water level of estuarine
waters. This definition also includes lands within 30 feet of the normal high water level of public
trust waters located inland of the dividing line between coastal fishing waters and inland fishing
waters. Along Outstanding Resource Waters (ORWs), this definition includes lands within 575
feet of the normal high water level. (Note: There are no ORWs in the Currituck County planning
jurisdiction). Uses in coastal shoreline AECs can significantly impact water quality and the
productivity of the estuary.

Coastal wetlands are any marsh in the 20 coastal counties that regularly or occasionally floods by
lunar or wind tides and that includes one or more of 10 plant species:
• Spartina alterniflora: Salt Marsh (Smooth) Cord Grass
• Juncus roemerianus: Black Needlerush Salicornia spp: Glasswort
• Distichlis spicata: Salt (or Spike) Grass Limonium spp: Sea Lavender
• Scirpus spp: Bulrush
• Cladium jamaicense: Saw Grass Typha spp: Cattail
• Spartina patens: Salt Meadow Grass
• Spartina cynosuroides: Salt Red or Giant Cord Grass

Freshwater swamps and inland, non-tidal wetlands are not in the CAMA permit jurisdiction,
unless the CRC specifically designates them as AECs. However, these wetlands are protected by
the federal Clean Water Act. An Army Corps of Engineers 404 permit may be required for
projects taking place in these wetlands.

In Currituck County, estuarine waters include the Currituck/Albemarle Sounds, adjacent bays,
and the lower reaches of the North and Northwest Rivers. Public trust areas include all estuarine
waters, upper reaches of the North and Northwest Rivers, a number of small creeks (including
Tulls Creek and Landing Creek) and the Atlantic Ocean. The coastal shoreline AEC consists of
the shorelines of these water bodies. Coastal wetlands can be found adjacent the Currituck Sound
and along the western portion of the Outer Banks. Significant amounts of coastal wetlands are
also located on the west side of Knotts Island, the Northwest River at Tulls Bay and along the
North River on the western side of the Currituck mainland.

Permitted uses in public trust areas, estuarine waters and coastal wetlands include those allowed
by the Currituck County Unified Development Ordinance and the CRC’s standards. While the
CRC’s use standards give priority to the conservation of coastal wetlands, estuarine waters and
public trust areas, certain water-dependent uses are allowed. Generally, those uses which require
water access and which cannot function elsewhere, such as simple access channels, structures to
Section 3: Natural Systems Analysis
3-3
prevent erosion, navigation channels, boat docks, marinas, piers, wharfs and mooring pilings are
allowed provided construction occurs in compliance with state standards.

In Currituck County, uses allowed in the coastal shoreline AEC include those allowed by state
standards and those uses listed in the Currituck County Unified Development Ordinance. The
CRC’s guidelines for development within the coastal shoreline AEC are found in 15A NCAC 7H.
Key guidelines include the following:

• Not weaken or eliminate natural barriers to erosion;
• Limit impervious surfaces such as buildings, paved parking lots and roads to the amount
necessary to support the use and generally not exceed 30% of the AEC area of the lot,
except along the shoreline of an Outstanding Resource Water (ORW) where the built-
upon limit is 25% of the AEC area; and
• Maintain a buffer zone for a distance of 30 feet landward of the normal water level,
except along shorelines where the Environmental Management Commission has adopted
its own buffer standards.
Ocean Hazard System AECs
The Ocean Erodible AEC includes beaches and other oceanfront lands that are subject to long-
term erosion and significant shoreline changes. The seaward boundary of this AEC is the mean
low water line. The landward limit of the AEC is measured from the first line of stable natural
vegetation and is determined by adding a distance equal to 60 times the long-term, average annual
erosion rate for the shoreline to the distance of erosion expected during a major storm. The width
of this AEC varies from about 145 feet to more than 700 feet. Virtually Currituck County’s entire
oceanfront coastline is located within the ocean erodible area.

The High Hazard Flood AEC includes lands subject to flooding, high waves and heavy water
currents during a major storm. These are the lands identified as coastal flood with velocity
hazard, or V zones, on flood insurance rate maps prepared by the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA). V zones are determined by an engineering analysis of expected
flood levels during a storm, expected wave and current patterns and the existing topography of
the land. The high hazard flood AEC often overlaps with the ocean erodible AEC. Detailed flood
maps are available for review at the Currituck County Planning and Inspections Department.

Appropriate development in the ocean hazard AECs includes those uses which are consistent with
the CRC’s standards contained in 15A NCAC 7H and the Currituck County Unified Development
Ordinance. A key consideration contained in the CRC’s standards includes compliance with
setback requirements based on erosion rates. The erosion setback line extends inland from the
first line of stable vegetation and varies based on size of the structure as well as local erosion
rates.

Due to map scale and size, the exact locations of AECs are difficult to map. However, for general
informational purposes, a general depiction of the location of AECs in Currituck County is found
on Areas of Environmental Concern Map (Map 3.1) contained in Appendix E. It is stressed that
this map is for informational purposes only. The exact location of AECs must be identified onsite
by permitting staff of the NC Division of Coastal Management (DCM).
Soil Characteristics
A detailed soils survey was completed in 1982 in Currituck County by the United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Conservation Service, now known as the United States
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
3-4
Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS). According
to the survey, the majority of the County contains soils with severe limitations for conventional
onsite waste treatment systems (septic systems). In general, the soils in the County have
limitations for many uses due to wetness, flooding and high sand content. All soil types in
Currituck County have slight erosion hazard ratings.

The soil survey is for planning purposes and is not completed at the detailed scale needed for
permit decisions. The Soil Suitability for Septic Systems Map (Map 3.2) contained in Appendix E
is based on the soil survey and provides a general soils map of Currituck County. The map is
intended to compare the septic system suitability of large areas of land for general land use and
should not be used for selecting a specific site for development. All determinations of septic
suitability must be made by onsite investigation by a licensed soil scientist or county
environmental systems health specialist.

Soils with moderate to slight limitations for septic systems are limited in Currituck County. In
general they are located in the lower portions of the mainland and along the eastern portions of
Knotts Island. Virtually all of the soils on the Outer Banks and in the remaining areas have severe
limitations for septic systems.

The extent of soils suitable for development is important due to the continuing development of
the area and the absence of centralized sewer systems. Planned development densities in areas
without central sewer service must consider soil suitability for septic tank or alternative systems
must be developed. Consideration of soil conditions in areas expected to experience growth
should influence decisions regarding development densities and/or central sewer considerations.
Water Quality Classifications
All surface waters in North Carolina are assigned a primary classification by the NC Division of
Water Quality (DWQ). These classifications are based on the best-intended uses of the water.
Primary Nursery Areas are defined by the Marine Fisheries Commission. Water Quality Classes
and Subbasins Map (Map 3.3) found in Appendix E provides the use classifications for estuarine
waters in Currituck County. As shown on the map, a wide range of primary and supplemental
classifications are present. These classifications are described in Table 3.1 DWQ Primary
Classifications. Further discussion of surface waters is provided under the Environmental
Assessment discussion found later in this section.

Section 3: Natural Systems Analysis
3-5
Table 3.1 DWQ Primary Classifications
Class B Waters used for primary recreation and other uses suitable for Class C. Primary recreational
activities include swimming, skin diving, water skiing and similar uses involving human
body contact with water where such activities take place in an organized manner or on a
frequent basis. There are no restrictions on watershed development or types of discharges.
Class C Waters protected for secondary recreation, fishing, wildlife, fish and aquatic life
propagation and survival, agriculture and other uses suitable for Class C. Secondary
recreation includes wading, boating, and other uses involving body contact with water
where such activities take place in an infrequent, unorganized or incidental manner.
There are no restrictions on watershed development or types of discharges.
Class SC All tidal salt waters protected for secondary recreation such as fishing, boating and other
activities involving minimal skin contact; aquatic life propagation and survival; and
wildlife. Stormwater controls are required under CAMA and there are no categorical
restrictions on discharges.
Class SB Surface waters that are used for primary recreation, including frequent or organized
swimming and all SC uses. Stormwater controls are required under CAMA and there are no
categorical restrictions on discharges.
DWQ SUPPLEMENTAL CLASSIFICATIONS
Swamp
Waters Supplemental classification intended to recognize those waters that generally have naturally
occurring very low velocities, loss of pH and low dissolved oxygen. No specific restrictions
on discharge types or development are involved.
ADDITIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS BY OTHER AGENCIES
Primary
Nursery
Areas (PNA)
Primary Nursery Areas, as defined by the Marine Fisheries Commission, are those areas in
the estuarine system where initial post-larval development takes place. These areas are
usually located in the uppermost sections of a system where populations are uniformly very
early juveniles. The Division of Marine Fisheries is responsible for preserving, protecting
and developing Primary Nursery Areas for commercially important finfish and shellfish.
Primary Nursery Areas
Table 3.1 above also describes Primary Nursery Areas. As noted in the table, primary nursery
areas are generally located in the upper reaches of creeks and bays. These areas are usually
shallow with soft muddy bottoms and are surrounded by marshes and wetlands. These are
growing areas for juvenile finfish and shellfish of economic importance.

There are no coastal primary nursery areas in Currituck County. Inland primary nursery areas are
located in Deep Creek, Lutz Creek, Tulls Creek and Tulls Bay on the mainland and represent a
total of approximately 1127 acres. Primary nursery areas are shown on the map of Fragile Areas
located in Appendix E.
Flood Hazards and Storm Surge Areas
Flood hazard areas are usually defined by the 100-year floodplain (one percent chance of flooding
in any year). Due to its low elevation, much of Currituck County is included in these hazard
areas. Virtually all of the Outer Banks area is included in the 100-year flood hazard area. The
majority of the western portion and areas along the eastern waterfront of Knotts Island are
designated as flood hazard areas. Significant portions of the both the upper and lower Mainland
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
3-6
are also included. The western portion of the upper Mainland is not mapped in the 100-year flood
zone.

In Currituck County, the flood hazard areas include the following:
• A zones – one percent chance of flooding in any year
• V zones – one percent chance of flooding in any year that includes wave action
• X shaded zones – 0.2 percent annual chance of flooding and areas with a one percent
• chance of flood with average depths of less than one foot or with drainage areas less than
• one square mile
• X zones – areas determined to be outside of 0.2 percent annual chance of flooding

Currituck County has participated in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) since 1984.
The NFIP is a federal program that enables property owners in participating communities to
purchase insurance protection against losses from flooding. By participating in the NFIP,
Currituck County has adopted a Flood Damage Ordinance, which requires basic floodproofing for
all new construction to the base flood elevation or the elevation of the 100-year flood. Currituck
County also participates in the Community Rating System (CRS). This is a voluntary program
whereby deductions on flood insurance rates are provided when participating communities
exceed the minimum NFIP requirements. A general depiction of the 100-year floodplain is shown
in Appendix E. Flood Hazard Areas Map (Map 3.4) . More detailed flood maps prepared by the
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) are available for review at the Currituck
County Planning and Inspections Department.

Storm surge is the relatively rapid rise in sea level caused by water being pushed towards shore
by the force of the winds associated with a hurricane or other intense storm. As the water comes
ashore with the storm, it causes flooding that is often a hurricane’s most dangerous and damaging
characteristic. Extensive areas of Currituck County are vulnerable to storm surge hazards
associated with hurricanes. Depending upon the severity and speed of the storm, much of the
County could be impacted by storm surge. According to the storm surge models prepared by
FEMA, slow-moving Category 1-3 storms (forward velocities less than 15 miles per hour) would
impact greater areas than fast moving Category 1-3 storms. Likewise, fast-moving Category 4-5
storms (forward velocities greater than 15 miles per hour) would produce a more intense impact
than slow-moving Category 4-5 storms. The Flood Hazard Areas Map (Appendix E) depicts the
areas subject to storm surge based on the most intense storm intensity and speed. The entire
County, with the exception of a small triangle of land in the upper western corner of the
Mainland, is included in the storm surge.
Anadromous fish spawning areas
Anadromous fish spawning areas are those tributary streams where certain species of fish spawn.
Anadromous fish migrate from their primary ocean habitat to spawn, or breed, in freshwater
areas. Anadromous fish are valuable recreational and commercial species and are an important
component of the ecosystem.

In Currituck County, anadromous fish spawning areas are located only on the Mainland
(Appendix E. Fragile Areas Map). The largest spawning area is the upper reaches of the North
River, including Taylor Bay, Narrow Bridge Creek, Indiantown Creek, East Creek, Bump
Landing Creek and a portion of the Intracoastal Waterway. Other areas include Tulls Creek, Tulls
Bay, Roland Creek, Cowells Creek and Moyock Run.
Section 3: Natural Systems Analysis
3-7
Non-Coastal Wetlands
According to the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), wetlands are “areas that are
periodically or permanently inundated by surface or groundwater and support vegetation adapted
for life in saturated soil.” Wetlands include swamps, marshes, bogs and similar areas. Wetlands
serve important functions relating to fish and wildlife; food chain production; habitat; nesting;
spawning; rearing and resting sites for aquatic and land species; protection of other areas from
wave action and erosion; storage areas for storm and flood waters; natural recharge areas where
ground and surface water are interconnected; and natural water filtration and purification
functions.

While individual alterations of wetlands may constitute a minor change, the cumulative effect of
numerous changes often results in major damage to wetland resources. The USACE regulates
development in wetlands under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, which determines which
areas qualify for protection as wetlands.

The Fragile Areas Map (Map 3.5) in Appendix E shows areas that may be classified as non-
coastal wetlands. While this map does not provide a lot-by-lot identification of wetlands, it does
provide information as to the general areas that may contain non-coastal wetlands. These areas
are extensive in Currituck County and must be determined by onsite investigation. On the Outer
Banks non-coastal wetlands are generally located between coastal wetlands and uplands along the
Currituck Sound. The largest area of non-coastal wetlands on Knotts Island occurs in the
southwestern portion of the subarea. Major areas of non-coastal wetlands on the Mainland occur
along the Northwest River, along the western County boundary, and generally on either side of
US Highway 158 between the communities of Maple and Grandy.
Natural Heritage Areas
The Fragile Areas Map also shows general locations of areas classified as Significant Natural
Heritage Areas by the NC Natural Heritage Program. The Program inventories, catalogues and
facilitates protection of the rarest and the most outstanding elements of the natural diversity of
our state. These elements of natural diversity include those plants and animals that are so rare, or
the natural communities that are so significant, they merit special attention as land use decisions
are made.

The Natural Heritage Program is not a regulatory program, although some of these sites may be
protected or regulated by other state or federal agencies. Many of these sites are unprotected.
Significant Natural Heritage Areas in Currituck County include the Great Marsh on Knotts
Island; and the Currituck Banks / Swan Island Natural Area, Currituck Banks Corolla Natural
Area and Pine Island / Currituck Club Natural Area on the Outer Banks. Major Heritage Areas on
the Mainland include the Green Sea in the northwestern tip of the County; the area around
Northwest River including the Northwest River Marsh Game Land, Nellie Bell Ponds Marsh and
Cedar Swamp, Gibbs Woods / Tull Bay Marshes, Gibbs Point Forests and Marshes and Lower
Tull Creek Woods and Marsh; the Buckskin Creek / Great Swamp and Indiantown Creek / North
River Cypress Forest west of the community of Maple; the Church Island Marsh, Maple Swamp
Gordonia Forest and North River / Deep Creek Marshes and Forest near Coinjock; and the
Mamie Marshes and Ponds and Harbinger Marshes on the southern tip of the Mainland.
ENVIRONMENTAL COMPOSITE M AP
The Currituck County Environmental Composite Map (Appendix E, Map 3.6) shows the extent
and overlap of natural features described in this section. Based on the County’s analysis of these
features, and the determination of the capabilities and limitations of these areas for development,
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
3-8
this map also contains the general locations of three categories, or classes, of land. The land
classes shown on the Environmental Composite Map, the description of the classes, and the
natural features contained in each class are shown below:
Class I
Class I is land containing only minimal hazards and having only slight limitations that may be
addressed by accepted land planning and development practices. In Currituck County, this class
contains the following natural features:
• Soils with slight to moderate limitations for septic tanks
• Non-wetland areas
• Land on Knotts Island and the Mainland located inside 100-year flood hazard area
• Land on Knotts Island and the Mainland located inside storm surge area
Class II
Class II is land containing development hazards and limitations that may be addressed by
methods such as restrictions on types of land uses, special site planning, or provision of public
services. In Currituck County, this class contains the following natural features:
• Estuarine shoreline
• Public Trust Shoreline
• Ocean erodible area
• High hazard flood area
• Non-coastal wetlands rated as beneficial significance (NC-CREWS)
• Land on the Outer Banks located within a 100-year flood hazard area
• Land on the Outer Banks located within a storm surge area
• Soils on Knotts Island and the Mainland with severe limitations for septic tanks
• Significant Natural Heritage Areas
Class III
Class III is land containing serious hazards for development or lands where the impact of
development may cause serious damage to the functions of natural systems. In Currituck County,
this class contains the following natural features:
• Coastal wetlands
• Estuarine waters
• Public trust areas
• Unvegetated beach areas
• Non-coastal wetlands rated as substantial significance or exceptional significance (NC-
CREWS)
• Soils on the Outer Banks with severe limitations for septic tanks
• Protected lands

Map 3.1 Environmental Composite Map (Appendix E) is a “broad-brush” depiction of the
location of the three land classes discussed above. Due to the size and scale of the map, it cannot
be used for permit decision-making or for final development plans. The Geographic Information
System (GIS) – based model that was used to create the map uses one-acre units. Therefore, one
“cell” in the model represents one acre. When the different data sets overlay in the model, the
highest class present will be assigned to the cell. For example, on the Mainland, an area that is
located inside an exceptional wetland (Class III) inside the storm surge area (Class I) and in an
area with soils with severe limitations for septic systems (Class II) will be assigned to Class III.

Section 3: Natural Systems Analysis
3-9
Special Note Concerning Primary Nursery Areas— As noted previously, there are inland primary
nursery areas in Currituck County located in Deep Creek, Lutz Creek, Tulls Creek and Tulls Bay
(See Fragile Areas Map, Appendix E). The Environmental Composite Map (Map 3.1, Appendix
E) identifies the wetlands and marshes on the north and west sides of Tulls Bay, as well as both
sides of Tulls Creek as Class III areas, meaning that these areas are poorly suited for
development. The south side of Tulls Bay, on the other hand, is shown as mostly Class II, with a
few much smaller areas of Class I. and Class III. The predominant Class II designation is
appropriate for the higher and dryer properties located on the south side of the bay, compared to
the extensive wetland areas located north and west of the bay. Tulls Creek Road, which provides
access to the properties along the south side of Tulls Bay, has seen considerable residential
development, with more expected. As additional properties on the south side of Tulls Bay become
developed, the County’s policies concerning estuarine shorelines including, for example, the use
of vegetated buffers, will help mitigate adverse impacts.

Special Note Concerning Water Supply Watersheds and Wellhead Protection Area Plans—All
potable water supplies in Currituck County are derived from ground water sources. Therefore,
there are no surface water supply watersheds in the county. Further, concerning groundwater
resources in particular, there have been no wellhead protection plans submitted or approved for
any of the three county-owned water supply systems in Currituck County: (1) Currituck Mainland
Water Department in Maple (2) Ocean Sands Water and Sewer District in Corolla, and (3) the
Southern Outer Banks Water System, also in Corolla. (Gale Johnson, Division of Environmental
Health, Public Water Supply Section, Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
telephone interview, 919-715-2853) Information concerning wells supplying private or
community water systems was not available from private sources.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
This section of the Land Use Plan provides an assessment of the following environmental
conditions and features and discusses their limitations or opportunities for development: water
quality, natural hazards and natural resources.
Water Quality in Currituck County and Surrounding Region
Surface Water and Impaired Streams
Currituck County lies within the Pasquotank River Basin in subbasin 03-01-54. The subbasin
boundary roughly makes up the county boundary although it includes a small portion of Camden
County. The Pasquotank River Basin comprises not only the Pasquotank River but also other
major waterbodies including the North River, Northwest River, Perquimans River, Little River,
Alligator River, Scuppernong River, Croatan Sound, Currituck Sound, Albemarle Sound and a
portion of the Pamlico Sound. Major waterbodies in Currituck County include Currituck Sound,
North Landing River and Northwest River. The North River makes up a portion of the county’s
southwestern boundary. A large portion Currituck Sound serves as a critical part of the Atlantic
Flyway for migratory waterfowl (NCDENR-A).

Several reports outline water quality in Currituck County and the surrounding region. The
Chowan/Pasquotank River Basinwide Assessment Report covers the period from 1995 to 2000
and was published in early 2002. The Pasquotank River Basinwide Water Quality Management
Plan was published in late 1997. Both reports were created by the NC Division of Water Quality
(DWQ). According to DWQ almost all waterbodies listed in Currituck County are classified a SC
or C-Swamp. The three exceptions are Roland Creek and Tull Creek, listed as B-Swamp, and
Albemarle Sound, listed as SB. A classification of SC or C rates the water body to be used for
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
3-10
aquatic life propagation/protection and secondary recreation (boating/fishing); SB or B also
includes primary recreation (swimming) in addition to SC and C uses; and the swamp designation
indicates that the waterbody will naturally be more acidic and have lower levels of dissolved
oxygen. None of the waterbodies in Currituck County are rated SA (commercial shellfish
harvesting).

In 2003, the Army Corps of Engineers initiated a comprehensive study of Currituck Sound to
determine why the water quality was in a state of decline and perhaps equally important, what
salinity level should this water body be from a natural resource management point of view.

Historically Currituck Sound has been both a salt and fresh water body. The salinity has been
influenced from both fresh water canals migrating from Virginia as well as relic ocean inlets
across the Outer Banks. This study is expected to be completed in 2007.

The report entitled “A Comprehensive Environmental Management Plan and Model Development
for Currituck Sound Drainage Basin” completed by the Albemarle-Pamlico National Estuary
Program (APNEP) identified, through local questionnaires and surveys, that the areas of greatest
concern in the community were declining water quality, loss of wildlife habitat, and lack of
coordinated management efforts.

According to the 1997 DWQ report, the majority of nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) in
Pasquotank Subbasin 03-01-54 are resultant from agriculture and atmospheric deposition on areas
of open water. Nutrients from point sources and developed land in the county make up only l% of
the total nutrient load to the surface water. Pollution traveling into the county from the highly
urbanized Tidewater area of Virginia is another important water quality issue for Currituck
County.

Mercury was detected above the EPA screening values in multiple 1995 fish tissue samples in
Tulls Bay and Indiantown Creek. PCB concentrations exceeding EPA screening values were
found in fish tissue samples in Tulls Bay and heptachlor epoxide (pesticide) was detected in fish
tissue samples in the mouth of Currituck Sound (NCDENR). Hog Quarter Landing, Currituck
Sound upstream of Dews Island and North River are closed to shellfishing (NCDENR-A).

In 1995, Currituck Sound saw the resurgence of aquatic vegetation resulting in an improved
clarity compared to previous years. The aquatic vegetation growth decreases turbidity by settling
incoming sediments; and provides vital nursery habitat for fish, shellfish and other animals
(NCDENR). Between 1995 and 2001, no algae blooms were documented (NCDENR-A).

The federal Clean Water Act requires states to identify waters not meeting standards. Waters not
meeting standards can be placed on a list termed the 303(d) list. Waters are placed on North
Carolina’s 303(d) list primarily due to a partially or not supporting use support rating. In
Currituck County only one waterbody, the Atlantic Ocean is listed on the 2002 North Carolina
§303(d) list (NCDENR 2003). Listed as “the waters of the Atlantic Ocean contiguous to that
portion of Pasquotank River Basin that extends from the North Carolina-Virginia State Line to
the northeast tip of Ocracoke Island,” it comprises approximately 23 miles of County shoreline
and is classified as SB (NCDENR 2003). The Atlantic Ocean is impaired for fish consumption
due to high mercury levels, and is listed as a low priority for further study (NCDENR 2003).

There are two permitted minor National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
dischargers in the subbasin that could also impact water quality. They are the Currituck County
Water Treatment Plant and the Corolla North Utilities. Both facilities have a good history of
Section 3: Natural Systems Analysis
3-11
compliance with the limitations of the discharge permits.

There are nine large surface sewage treatment plants in the County that have potential for
impacting water quality. Three of these plants are located in Moyock, one is located in Maple and
five are located on the Outer Banks. Of these plants, the Currituck County Planning and
Inspections Department has noted capacity problems with the Monteray Shores Sewage
Treatment Plant.

There are 64 large underground septic systems in the County. Of these systems, the basinwide
plan notes that Carolina Village Mobile Home Park in Moyock has been in continual violation of
its State permit due to problems with the spray irrigation. Little effort appears to have been
expended by the owner to alleviate the problem.
Shellfish Waters
As noted above, there are no water bodies in Currituck County that are rated SA (suitable for
commercial shellfish harvesting). In addition, consultation with the Shellfish Sanitation and
Recreational Water Quality Section of the State Division of Environmental Health (telephone
interview March 24, 2005, with Assistant Section Chief Patricia Fowler, 252-726-6827) revealed
that the waters of Currituck County generally have insufficient salinity levels to support
commercial shellfish. While the North River is one water body that has physical characteristics
appropriate for shellfish beds, high fecal coliform counts require that the river be closed to
shellfishing. Prospects for opening the area for shellfish harvesting are not good, given the trend
toward increased development and greater stormwater runoff levels draining into the river.
Public Health Hazards
Overall, water quality is still considered good in subbasin 03-01-54 (surface waters of Currituck
County). Based on a perceived trend in slight water quality decline, growth management, or
other measures will be necessary to maintain water quality (NCDENR-A). As noted above, the
Atlantic Ocean is classified as partially supporting for fish consumption because of high levels of
mercury. Mercury is assumed to be entering the subbasin from the atmosphere and is not
considered a locally generated pollutant (NCDENR-A).

There is one active confined animal feedlot operation in Currituck County which is also within
this subbasin. This registered swine operation is listed as Robert Kovacs Farm, located in Gibbs
Woods on the Mainland. It is a wean to feeder/feeder to finish/farrow to wean operation with an
estimated 687 swine (NCDENR-D). Robert Kovacs Farm is currently in active operation and has
two (2) State permits in adjacent properties. (See Map 4.1 Existing Land Use Map). There are
no other confined animal feedlot operations in the County.
Beaches
Since 1997, there have been two (2) beach advisories in Currituck County recorded by the North
Carolina Division of Environmental Health. An advisory for the beach a Bell Island Campground
was issued in July 1997 for high levels of fecal coliform (NCDHE 2004). The second advisory,
also at Bell Island Campground, was issued on July 8, 1998 and lifted on August 6, 1998 for high
levels of fecal coliform bacteria (NCDEH 2004). In both instances the elevated levels of fecal
coliform were due to migratory waterfowl in the area.
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
3-12
Natural Hazards
Assessment of areas subject to storm hazards.
Currituck County consists of approximately 273 square miles and is divided into four natural land
areas: 1) the mainland, which comprises a major portion of the county, forms a peninsula that
extends from the Virginia line to the Wright Memorial Bridge; 2) Gibbs Woods, which is
accessible only through Virginia, is bounded on the west by the North West River and on the east
by North Landing River; 3) Knotts Island forms an island that is bounded on the west by North
Landing River and on to the east by Knotts Island Bay. Access to the island is possible only
through Virginia and by ferry; and 4) the final major division is the Outer Banks. Bounded on the
east by the Atlantic Ocean and the west by the Currituck Sound access is limited to NC 12 (two-
land) through Dare County. The northern portion of the Outer Banks is further limited to four-
wheel drive vehicles along the oceanfront.

Currituck County has suffered numerous natural hazards over the past 50 years. Because of the
County’s proximity to coastal waters and its topography, a significant portion of the County is at
risk to flooding associated with storm events. While it is not feasible to prohibit development in
these vulnerable areas, the County recognizes this vulnerability and has adopted policies to
minimize and mitigate damages associated with these natural hazards.

According to the Hazard Identification and Analysis matrix, the entire county is vulnerable to
hurricanes, severe winter storms, and thunderstorms. The size of these storm systems is great
enough to threaten all of the areas within the county. A good portion of the county is at risk to
nor’easters and associated flooding, particularly the riverside and soundside areas. Smaller areas
are vulnerable to earthquakes/tsunamis, landslides, tornado/waterspout, flooding, and wildfire.

Hurricanes pose the greatest risk to Currituck County of all natural hazards. The proximity of
Currituck County, coupled with the size of tropical storms and hurricanes, makes Currituck
County especially vulnerable to high winds and storm surge. Hurricanes and tropical storms still
pack much of their punch when they affect Currituck County. As the tropical systems move
inland, they lose the ability to refresh themselves with warm water. Currituck County is
surrounded on its eastern and southern borders with water. The waterfront areas (Currituck Outer
Banks, Point Harbor, Church Island, Knott’s Island, Gibbs Woods) are at the most risk from
storm surge flooding. The entire county is at risk to high winds associated with tropical systems.
Structures Subject to Hazards
There are 156,150 acres within the boundaries of Currituck County. This analysis included
incorporated and unincorporated areas of the county. Susceptibility of property in Currituck
County was analyzed using three different flooding scenarios: 100-year, SLOSH – Slow, and
SLOSH – Fast. (See Table 3.2)

The Currituck County GIS data used for this analysis did not contain a land use code. Therefore,
analysis of residential, commercial, and institutional properties was not possible without
conducting a detailed land use survey of the entire county. However, the GIS data included a field
for Total Value and a field for Current Land Value. By subtracting the Current Land Value from
the Total Value, it was possible to determine how many developed properties were located within
the study area and the value of those structures. Projections of potential damage were not
included with this analysis. Currituck County is sparsely developed and has numerous
environmental constraints on development. Therefore, projections made by using average
structure values and application to undeveloped properties would not be useful.

Section 3: Natural Systems Analysis
3-13
Using the 100-year flood models (the FIRM model, or the model insurance rates are
based on), the A Zone contains 119 acres of developed property. The AE Zone contains
34,360 acres of developed property. The VE Zone contains 284 acres of developed
property. According to the Currituck County tax records, the developed properties in the A Zone
contain structures that (the total property value minus the land value) amount to $10,040,608. The
developed properties in the AE Zone contain structures amount to $278,031,073. The VE Zone
contains structures amounting to $66,438,596.

The SLOSH Slow Storm Zone contains 33,199 developed acres that would be affected by a
Category 1 or Category 2 hurricane. A storm of this magnitude would affect structures worth
$438,747,897. A Category 3 storm would affect structures with a total building value of
$338,139,522. A Category 4 or 5 storm would affect structures with a total building value of
$320,437,404.

The SLOSH Fast Storm Zone contains 31,427 developed acres that would be affected by a
Category 1 or Category 2 hurricane. A storm of this magnitude would affect structures worth
$319,132,367. A Category 3 storm would affect structures with a total building value of
$464,025,978. A Category 4 or 5 storm would affect structures with a total building value of
$338,239,621.
Repetitive Loss Properties
Over 2.5 million buildings are insured by the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), but a
fraction of them (less than 2%) account for 33% of the flood insurance claims paid since 1978.
This is because these few properties have been flooded more than once, and some of them have
been flooded numerous times. Repetitive loss properties are defined by FEMA as properties for
which two or more claims of at least $1,000 have been paid by the NFIP within any 10-year
period since 1978. (CRS Coordinator’s Manual, 1999. Federal Emergency Management Agency,
National Flood Insurance Program, Community Rating System. p. 500-3.)

Currituck County has 14 repetitive loss properties within its jurisdiction, according to a recent
FEMA list of repetitive loss properties. All 4 of these properties are located within the AO Zone.
There are 10 repetitive loss properties located in the B and X Zones.

Curri t uc k Co un t y 2 00 5 L an d Use P l an
3 -1 4
Table 3.2 Currituck County Present Vulnerability
Current Conditions Future Projections
Vacant
Acres
Developed
Acres
Total
Acres
Building
Value ($)
Land
Value ($)
Total
Value ($)
Projected
Number
of
People1
Total
Projected
Value ($)2
INUNDATION
SLOW
Category 1 and
2
59,797 33,199 92,997 438,747,897 662,051,483 1,100,799,380 26,227 2,641,909,813
Category 3 21,400 14,639 36,039 338,139,522 323,912,656 662,052,178 9,386 945,487,538
Category 4 and
5 24,589 8,988 33,577 320,437,404 291,260,892 611,698,296 10,784 1,086,397,094
TOTAL
105,786 56,826 162,6131,097,324,8231,277,225,0312,374,549,854 46,397 4,673,794,445
INUNDATION
FAST
Category 1 and
2
60,689 31,427 92,117 319,132,367 611.393,956 930,526,323 26,618 2,681,342,239
Category 3 17,844 14,339 32,184 464,025,978 360,071,380 824,097,358 7,827 788,395,365
Category 4 and
5
26,802 11,890 38,692 338,239,621 324,477,614 662,717,235 11,755 1,184,157,276
TOTAL 105,335 57,656 162,9931,121,397,9661,295,942,9502,417,340,916 46,200 4,653,894,880
100-Year
Floodplain
A 4,081 119 4,201 10,040,608 4,798,819 14,839,427 1,790 180,335,355
AE 65,088 34,360 99,448 278,031,073 553,033,486 831,064,559 28,547 2,875,654,695
VE 145 284 429 66,438,596 90,914,529 157,353,125 64 6,427,894
TOTAL 69,314 34,763 104,078 354,510,277 648,746,834 1,003,257,111 30,401 3,062,417,944
Estimates of public and private damage resulting from floods and wind that has occurred since
the last plan update.
The following table describes hazard damage developed as part of the Currituck County Hazard
Mitigation plan, adopted in 2004. No data was developed that specified damage estimates since
the last Land Use Plan (1990).

1 Projected Number of People was determined by dividing the 2001 county population (18,861) by the
developed acres, to determine how many persons per acre there are in Currituck County (2.28), then
dividing Undeveloped Acres by Persons Per Acre.
2 Total Projected Value was determined by dividing the total developed acres by Total Value to determine
the average value per acre ($44,181), then multiplying Vacant Acres by the average value per acre.
Section 3: Natural Systems Analysis
3-15

Table 3.3 Summary of Reported Storm-Related Damage and Casualties in
Currituck County [Period of Record: Storms (1/1993-7/1999, except 6-7/1993); Tornadoes
(1/1950-12/1992); Wind and hail (1/1959-12/1992)]
Events Numbers Deaths Injuries Property
Damage*
Crop
Damage*
Total
Damage*
Currituck
Excessive Heat 1 0 0 $0 $0 $0
Extreme Cold 1 0 0 $0 $0 $0
Hail 8 0 0 $0 $0 $0
Heavy Rain 2 0 0 $0 $0 $0
Snow 3 0 0 $0 $0 $0
Floods 1 0 0 $584,237 $584,237 $1,168,474
Flash Flood 1 0 0 $0 $0 $0
Lightening 1 0 0 $322,839 $322,839
Thunderstorm 2 0 0 $0 $0 $0
Thunderstorm
Wind
11 0 0 $21,128 $0 $21,128
High Winds 3 0 0 $276,295 $276,295
Funnel Cloud 1 0 0 $0 $0 $0
Tornado 5 0 0 $356,814 $356,814
Subtotal 40 0 0 $1,561,313 $584,237 $2,145,550

Hurricanes, Tropical Storms & Winter Storms (multi-county events that affected Currituck
Hurricanes 8 2 0 $28,553,424 $64,995,052 $93,548,475
Tropical Storms 1 0 0 $107,613 $0 $107,613
Winter Storms 3 0 0 $24,998 $0 $24,998
Subtotal 12 2 0 $28,686,034 $64,995,052 $93,681,086
Source: NOAA, National Climatic Data Center (Reports from National Weather Service in Categories)
*Damages are in 2002 US dollars, adjusted using the consumer price index (US Bureau of Labor Statistics,
March 2002, USDL-02-222, http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm) Hurricane, tropical storm, and
winter storm damages are multi-county estimates and storm-specific
Shoreline Erosion
The NC Division of Coastal Management (DCM) develops long-term average erosion rate maps
based on the average amount of erosion that occurs each year over a period of about 50 years.
Long-term average annual erosion rates are used by DCM to determine setback distances for
oceanfront construction. Setbacks are measured from the first line of stable, natural vegetation.
DCM standards require that, for small structures and single-family residences of any size, the
setback distance is determined by multiplying the average annual erosion rate by 30. For
example, on a property where the erosion rate is three feet per year, the setback is a minimum of
90 feet from the vegetation line. In areas that are naturally gaining sand or have an erosion rate of
two feet a year or less, the setback distance is a minimum of 60 feet. Setbacks for multi-family
residences, such as condominiums, and commercial structures larger than 5,000 square feet are
determined by multiplying the average annual erosion rate by 60. In areas where the erosion rate
is greater than 3.5 feet per year, the setback for large structures is determined by multiplying the
erosion rate by 30 and adding 105 feet. In areas that are naturally gaining sand or have an erosion
rate of 2 feet a year or less, the setback distance is a minimum of 120 feet.

Updated erosion rate maps became effective on April 1, 2004. According to DCM, the new maps

Curri t uc k Co un t y 2 00 5 L an d Use P l an
3 -1 6
are more accurate, more detailed and easier to use than previous erosion rate maps. The new maps
were calculated using photographs taken in 1998. Previous maps were based on 1992
photography. Updated Erosion Rate Maps for the Outer Banks beaches are found in Appendix E,
as Maps 3.7 through 3.11.

These maps can also be viewed at: http://www.nccoastalmanagement.net/Maps/ER_1998/
SB_Factor.htm

According to the 1998 erosion rate maps, almost the entire County oceanfront shoreline has an
erosion rate factor of 2.0 feet/year. The Swan Beach area midway between Carova Beach and
Corolla has higher erosion rate factors ranging from 4.5 to 8.5 feet/year.
Natural Resources
Significant Natural Heritage Sites
There are approximately 34 Natural Heritage areas in Currituck County, comprising over 71,000
acres (NCDENR-E 2002). Additional information on the Natural Heritage Program is provided
the natural features discussion in this chapter.
Mining Permits
Growth trends in Currituck County and the state have resulted in increases in the construction
industry and associated expansion of the mining of clay and sand to support construction projects.
According to 2000 North Carolina mining statistics issued by NCDENR, sand and gravel mining
consists of 64% of all mining in the state. Of 574 sand and gravel mines in North Carolina, 18 are
located in Currituck County (NCGS 2001). These mines are scattered throughout the mainland
and have increased in number in recent years.

Local mining activities are regulated by both North Carolina and Currituck County. NCDENR
administers a mining permit process and the County regulates through conditional use permits.
The Currituck County Unified Development Ordinance requires mining operations to comply
with all state guidelines, as well as local standards. This provision allows the County to respond
quickly to any mining related provision, this eliminating dependency on limited state resources.
By responding quickly, the County can minimize negative environmental impacts.
Agricultural Resources
Historically, agriculture has been an integral part of Currituck County’s economy and way of life.
However, as seen in many areas experiencing growth pressures, the number of farms in the
County is shrinking for a variety of reasons including the conversion of farmland to residential
subdivisions, low wages or incomes, high assessed tax values of farmland and simply the desire
for better job or more secure job opportunities in other occupations. As growth continues, this
trend is expected to continue with the loss of prime farmland.

Currently the County has approximately 30,000 acres in agricultural production as well as one
commercial timber operation; however, that amount has been diminishing by about 500 acres
annually for the past five years. In addition, this loss represents some of the most productive
farmland in the County. To help address this problem the County has established a “Farmland
Preservation Agricultural Advisory Board” initiated in May 2001 with the goal of trying to
preserve 5,000 acres per year over the next 10 years. Funding for this program comes from grants
from USDA, and NRCS (50% matching) and with local government funds.
Prime farmland soils are among the best suited for septic tank absorption fields. Since septic
Section 3: Natural Systems Analysis
3-17
tanks are the primary type of sewage disposal system on the Mainland, areas containing these
soils are vulnerable for conversion to residential uses. Prime farmland soils are also those that are
best suited to production of food, feed, forage, fiber and oilseed crops (USDA-NRCS 1982).
There are five prime farmland soil types found in Currituck County, accounting for 6.2% (10,846
acres) of all the soils in the county (USDA-NRCS 1982).

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

4-1
Section 4: Existing Land Use and Development
SECTION 4: EXISTING LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT
INTRODUCTION
This section of the Land Use Plan provides a description of current and emerging development trends in the
three subareas of Currituck County and a forecast of future development based on existing trends. The
analysis of existing development is a major component of the foundation upon which land use policies and
the future land use map are built. It provides a base for projecting future land needs and for forecasting the
location of development.
EXISTING LAND USE
Currituck County has three distinct areas in terms of general land use. These are the three subareas that are
the basis for the land use plan. The first subarea consists of the Mainland portion of Currituck County and
Gibbs Woods. The second subarea consists of Knotts Island. The third subarea is the Outer Banks beaches
and includes both Corolla and the “off-road” beach area known as Carova Beach.

Land use patterns are different for the three subareas and are represented on Map 4.1 (See Appendix E)
Existing Land Use. This map was created from data compiled by the Currituck County Geographic
Information Systems (GIS) Department in March 2004.

General land use categories used to develop this map and the descriptions of uses in the categories follow:
• Residential – single-family homes, duplexes and multifamily housing (apartments, townhouses and
condominiums).
• Commercial – general and specialty retail, conveniences stores, central business districts, personal
services, professional services and offices, mixed uses, hotels and motels.
• Industrial – intensive and extensive manufacturing operations, warehousing and distribution
establishments, research parks.
• Institutional – churches, hospitals, schools and related establishments, public parks, golf courses,
swimming pools beach and estuarine access locations, dedicated open space, public or privately
owned land with development restrictions. Some of these areas, such as federal or state lands, are
sometimes referred to as “protected” lands.
• Agriculture – bona fide farms.
• Undeveloped – land in an idle state and not used for any open-space function. This category
includes Forestry.
• Other – golf courses, cemeteries, parking lots, etc.

The following table of land use in Currituck County is an extension of the information contained on the
Existing Land Use Map (Table 4.1, Appendix E). The table shows the number of acres in each land use
category in each of the three subareas. Table 4.2 shows the percent of land use of the developed land,
including agriculture.

4-2
Curri t uc k Co un t y 2 00 6 L an d Use P l an
Table 4.1 Currituck County Land Use (acres)
Land Use Mainland Knotts Island Outer Banks Total Acres % County
Commercial 1390 20 128 1,539 1%
Industrial 1,906 0 114 2,021 1%
Institutional 717 6,971 2,441 10,129 6%
Residential 11,247 1,094 1,741 14,083 9%
Other 1,624 0 319 1,943 1%
Total Developed 16,884 8,085 4,743 29,715 18%
Agriculture 43,878 1,257 0 45,134 29%
Undeveloped 75,031 1,330 6,702 83,062 53%
Total 135,793 10,673 11,445 157,911 100%

Table 4.2 Developed Land in Currituck County
Land Use Category Percentage of Developed Land in County
Commercial 5.2%
Industrial 6.8%
Institutional 34.1%
Residential 47.4%
Other 6.5%

As shown above, more than 80% of the land area of Currituck County is currently undeveloped
(including agriculture). Residential uses constitute the largest percentage of developed uses with
institutional uses ranking second. (It is important to note that the institutional category includes
state and federal owned gamelands, wildlife refuges and public access sites).

According to records maintained by the Currituck County Planning and Inspections Department,
the total number of annual residential building permits issued in the County has increased steadily
from 1998 through 2003, except for a slight decrease in 2000. Residential permit activity is
primarily single family homes. No multi-family (duplex, triplex or condominium) permits have
been issued since 1999, when ten multi-family projects were permitted. Commercial building
permit activity was strong in 1998 and 1999, with decreases beginning in 2000 and continuing
through 2003. Additional information on building permit activity is found in Section 2
Population, Housing and Economy.

Currituck County maintains records on land development for major, minor and private access
subdivisions. Major subdivisions are those with more than five lots; minor subdivisions have five
or less lots; and private access subdivisions are those with five or less lots and private roads. In
addition to these categories of subdivisions, exempt subdivisions are those with individual lots
larger than ten acres. Minor and private access subdivisions are only required to meet minimal
County requirements. Exempt subdivisions are not subject to the County’s subdivision
requirements or the adequate facilities regulations.

Major subdivision activity in the County remained fairly steady from 1998 through 2000, with
increased activity in 2001 and again in 2003. Between 1998 and 2003, a total of 1535 major
subdivision lots, including 192 commercial lots, were approved by Currituck County (Table 4.3).
In 2001, the County approved major subdivisions totaling 266 residential lots and 72 commercial
lots. In 2003, major subdivision approvals added 281 residential lots and 22 commercial lots. In

4-3
Section 4: Existing Land Use and Development
April 2002 a major subdivision moratorium was enacted by the County that expired in April
2003. Minor / private access / exempt subdivision activity fluctuated through 2001, then
increased and remained steady in 2002 and 2003. Between 1998 and 2003, 834 lots were
established in these subdivisions.

Table 4.3 Approved Subdivision Lots 1998-2003
Subarea Major lots (includes
commercial lots)
Minor / Private Access /
Exempt Lots
Mainland 1079 709
78 Knotts Island 11
Outer Banks Beaches 445 47
Total 1535 831

As of July 2006, there were a total of 3,827 platted but undeveloped lots on the Currituck
Mainland. Of those, 607 are located in Moyock Township, 718 in Crawford Township, and 2502
in Poplar Branch Township.

To effectively evaluate land use in the County, the Land Use Plan analyzes land use in the three
subareas: the Mainland, Knotts Island and the Outer Banks beaches. The following section
provides charts summarizing the percentage of total acres and of developed land in each land use
category for the subareas. Descriptions of general development patterns for the subareas are also
provided.
Mainland Land Use Summary
Approximately 67% of developed land on the Mainland is currently in residential use (Table 4.4).
Building permit records from 1998 indicate that single family residential has steadily increased,
while the growth of manufactured homes has decreased. The area has seen limited multi-family
development.

Table 4.4 Land Use Percentages for the Mainland
Land Use Number of acres Percentage of total
acres in subarea
Percentage of Developed
Land in subarea
Commercial 1,390 1.1% 8.2%
Industrial 1,906 1.4% 11.3%
Institutional 717 0.5% 4.2%
Residential 11,247 8.3% 66.7%
Other 1,624 1.2% 9.6%
Total Developed 16,884 12.5% 100%
Undeveloped 75,031 55.2% n/a
Agriculture 43,878 32.3% n/a
Total 135,793 100%

There are numerous small communities in the Mainland sub-area. None of these communities are
incorporated municipalities. The Currituck County Mainland is heavily influenced by the
metropolitan areas of southeastern Virginia to the north and Dare County to the south. Since
development in the northern portion of the Mainland in the Moyock area is strongly affected by
the economic hubs of neighboring Virginia, new residential growth in this area tends to be of a

4-4
Curri t uc k Co un t y 2 00 6 L an d Use P l an
“bedroom community” nature. Subsequently, commercial uses in this area tend to be residential
support services. As a result of continued residential growth, additional commercially zoned
properties are developing in this area. Blackwater, a paramilitary training business and
manufacturer of target silhouettes, located in Camden County, provides spin-off business benefits
to the area. Additionally, the business owns property in Currituck and thus has the potential for
expansion. Access to the Blackwater site is through Currituck County.

There is a strong economic interest in capturing tourist dollars from travelers en route to the Outer
Banks beaches. As a result, commercial uses in the lower portion of the Mainland tend to involve
retail sales and warehousing adjacent to NC Highway 168 related to the support of the Outer
Banks resort/retirement economy. Commercial uses targeting boaters are also found along the
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway in the Coinjock area. Development is clustered in several small
communities including Currituck, Maple and Barco.

Gibbs Woods is predominantly residential, with limited commercial uses. Large portions are
currently in agricultural use, with much undeveloped land. There is one active confined animal
feedlot operation located in Gibbs Woods. The Robert Kovacs Farm is currently in active
operation and has two (2) State permits in adjacent properties.

The Currituck County Government Complex is located on the Mainland in the Village of
Currituck. State-owned lands in the subarea include East Carolina Great Dismal Swamp Research
Facility, NC Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC) Northwest River Marsh Gameland, WRC
North River Gameland, WRC Poplar Branch Management Area and the WRC Coinjock Access
Area.

Currituck County Airport is a publicly owned, public use general aviation airport located on the
north side of US Highway 158 in Maple. The airstrip consists of a concrete runway 4,000 feet
long by 150 wide, although plans are underway to extend the runway to 5,500 feet to
accommodate corporate jets.

There are three industrial parks located in the Mainland subarea. The Moyock Industrial Park is
located just south of Moyock on NC Highway 168. The Harbinger Industrial Park is located in
the southern portion. Another industrial park is operated by Currituck County at the County
Airport site as part of its Maple Complex. The Maple Complex is made up of approximately 400
acres and houses the County Airport, the Maple Industrial Park, a Community Park and County
government facilities.

The number of farms in the area is decreasing, due to conversion from agriculture to residential
subdivisions. However, agricultural uses continue to comprise a substantial amount of land,
approximately 32% in the Mainland subarea. Farmland is scattered throughout, with several large
tracts located in the northwestern portion of the County. Farms in this area actively produce corn,
soybeans and sweet potatoes. Soils in the lower Mainland tend to be poor, but are suitable for
peanut and grape production. As a result, new vineyards are being established in the Barco and
Grandy areas. Currituck County is a participant in the NC Farmland Preservation Trust Fund
program, which provides funds for the preservation and continued use of prime farmlands. The
program provides for individual ownership of prime farmlands, with the County maintaining
development rights to ensure continued agricultural use. Numerous roadside stands are located
along Highways 168 and 158 which sell a variety of fresh local produce in the summer.

More than 55% of the land on the Mainland is currently classified as undeveloped. The
availability of land, combined with the growing residential and commercial demands on the area,

4-5
Section 4: Existing Land Use and Development
allows opportunities for continued development, as long as support services, such as water and
sewer systems, can be provided.
Due to the existing diversity of land uses on the Mainland coupled with the growing pressure for
residential development some conflicts between uses are inevitable. These incompatible uses
include mineral extraction activities (sand and gravel mines) and the affect on “in-use” residential
wells and the often associated dewatering discharges of groundwater; mini-storage and
warehousing uses and the aesthetics as well as the volume of storm water generated from these
sites; farming practices in close proximity to housing developments; possible air pollution,
groundwater contamination, and waste disposal associated with confined animal feeding
operations; and the appearance of billboards.
Knotts Island Land Use Summary
Knotts Island comprises the second subarea of Currituck County. This subarea is accessed via
state ferry or private boat from the Mainland and the Outer Banks area or by land through
southern Virginia. The largest land use on Knotts Island is the Mackay Island National Wildlife
Refuge, which comprises approximately 6,971 acres in the central and western portions adjacent
the Currituck Sound and the North Landing River. The Refuge makes up the majority of the
Institutional category in Table 4.5. The remaining area of Knotts Island is primarily residential,
with limited commercial uses.

Table 4.5 Land Use Percentages for Knotts Island
Land Use Number of Acres Percentage of Total
Acres in Subarea
Percentage of Developed
Land in Subarea
Commercial 20 0.2% 0.1%
Industrial 0 0% 0%
Institutional 6,971 65.3% 86.3%
Residential 1,094 10.3% 13.6%
Other 0 0 0%
Total Developed 8,085 75.8% 100%
Undeveloped 1,330 12.5% n/a
Agriculture 1,257 11.7% n/a
Total 10,673 100%

As noted in Table 4.3, from 1998 to 2003, the Knotts Island subarea experienced the least amount
of subdivision activity in the County. During this period, a total of 89 subdivision lots were
created. Of subdivisions recorded since 1996 a total of 49 recorded but unimproved lots remain
in Gibbs Woods and 80 recorded but unimproved lots remain on Knotts Island. Single-family
homes predominate, with no multi-family developments occurring during this time period.
Permits for new manufactured housing have seen a small decline.

Knotts Island has a significant retiree population. Many residents commute to jobs in the Virginia
Beach area.

Currently there is relatively little farming in Knotts Island, although there are two vineyards
(Martin and Moonrise Vineyards) with associated wineries located in the subarea. Although once
a fishing village, there is currently little commercial fishing activity.

4-6
Curri t uc k Co un t y 2 00 6 L an d Use P l an
Citizen participation in public meetings associated with the Land Use Plan update process
resulted in a call for increased lot sizes (minimum 10 acre) on Knotts Island and no desire for
central water or sewer services. Provided these sentiments are adopted by Currituck County,
combined with limited available undeveloped land, it is unlikely that the area will see significant
growth during the planning period.

As mentioned earlier, traditional commercial crabbing activities, both on Knotts Island and the
Mainland have generated some conflicts with sound front residential uses but with no associated
water quality impacts.
Outer Banks Beaches Land Use Summary
The Outer Banks Beaches represent the third subarea of Currituck County. Predominantly a
resort/retirement community, this area has experienced tremendous growth pressures in recent
years. The Outer Banks beaches represent two distinct areas. One is the highly developed area of
Corolla south to the Dare County line. Carova Beach, or the “off-road” area north of Corolla to
the Virginia state line, represents the second area.

Table 4.6 Land Use Percentages for the Outer Banks Beaches
Land Use Number of Acres Percentage of Total
Acres in Subarea
Percentage of Developed
Land in Subarea
Commercial 128 1.1% 2.7%
Industrial 114 1.0% 2.4%
Institutional 2,441 21.3% 51.5%
Residential 1,741 15.2% 36.7%
Other 319 2.8% 6.7%
Total Developed 4,743 41.4% 100%
Undeveloped 6,702 58.6% n/a
Agriculture 0 0% n/a
Total 11,445 100%

The Corolla area is primarily second homes and rental vacation properties. Currituck County staff
indicates that the Carova Beach area is more evenly divided between permanent and seasonal
residents, with approximately 60% of the homes used as permanent residences.

Much of the Outer Banks Beaches subarea consists of Planned Unit Developments (PUDs) and
subdivisions. Many of the PUDs in Corolla provide water and sewer service to residents and
businesses, while residences in Carova Beach rely upon septic tanks.

Commercial uses within the PUDs are limited to 10% of the area. Much of the available
commercial areas have yet to be developed, with less than three percent of existing development
consisting of commercial uses (Table 4.6).

Since 1998, housing trends on the Outer Banks Beaches reflected in building permit records show
steady growth of single family structures, no new multi-family developments and significant
commercial gains with the most commercial permits being issued in 2000.

Another housing trend observed in the subarea is the construction of very large houses,
particularly in Corolla. Residents at public participation meetings associated with the Land Use

4-7
Section 4: Existing Land Use and Development
Plan update indicated concern with the stresses placed on the area’s infrastructure caused by these
homes, many of which are seasonal.

According to the Currituck County Planning and Inspections Department, as of December 2003,
the northern Outer Banks area contained a total 3,100 residential lots. Of these lots, 436 (15%)
were developed. The southern Outer Banks area had a much higher developed rate. Of the 4,279
existing residential lots, 3,330 (78%) were developed.

While undeveloped platted lots are available in Corolla, very limited land exists for new
subdivision development in the southern portion of the subarea. The only area with growth
potential is the northern end of Monteray Shores. Phases I and II of this PUD have been
approved, with Phase III currently in the design phase. Undeveloped land exists in the Carova
Beach area, but constraints to development, including oceanfront erosion and lack of community
facilities, must be considered in determining growth policies.

Significant areas on the Outer Banks are in state and federal ownership. These areas are
considered “protected” lands and are unavailable for development. Included are the Currituck
National Wildlife Refuge and the North Carolina Coastal Management Currituck Estuarine
Sanctuary.

The Outer Banks Beaches subarea also contains the historic Whalehead Club, built in the 1920’s.
In 1992, Currituck County acquired the building and 28.5 acres of land to restore the structure to
house the Currituck Wildlife Museum. Adjacent the Whalehead Club are two additional restored
structures, the Currituck Beach Lighthouse and the Lighthouse Keeper’s Residence.

There are few incompatible land uses occurring in either Corolla or Carova. These few may
however include the following: Large Houses – Modest second homes and rental cottages are
being overshadowed by very large, high amenity rental machines that take on the appearance of
commercial buildings. Because these structures maximize coverage they reduce areas for storm
water infiltration and generate high volumes of run-off. Secondly, within PUDs the location and
future siting of wastewater treatment plants is a growing concern to existing and established
residential neighborhoods. In the Carova area there is an inherent conflict between increasing
development and the desire to preserve fragile natural areas and protection of the wild horse
population. Lastly, in the Carova area, and more specifically North Swan Beach, there are
several concentrations of abandoned automobiles that are in close proximity to sound waters and
may have an impact on adjacent water quality.
DEVELOPMENT TRENDS PROJECTED FOR THE NEXT FIVE YEARS
A review of development approvals and building permits by the Currituck County Planning
Department resulted in the above analysis of subdivision and commercial development activity by
subarea from 1998 to 2003. This section takes that information and, with the insights of the
County Planning Director and Steering Committee for the Land use Plan, extrapolates levels of
near-term future development for various parts of the county. Specifically, various locations in
the county are evaluated for their growth potential over the next 5 years (2005 to 2010).

As before, the analysis is organized around the three principle areas of the County (Mainland,
Outer Banks Beaches, and Knotts Island). Then, prospects for development at specific locations
within each of these areas are further described, as influenced by transportation improvements,
availability of water and sewer services, housing trends and other factors. For each location, an
assessment of future development compatibility with the Environmental Composite Map (See

4-8
Curri t uc k Co un t y 2 00 6 L an d Use P l an
Appendix E), as evidenced by the designation of Class I, II and III soils, is offered.

It is important to note that this analysis speaks only to the compatibility of near-term development
with the suitability of the land according to the three classes on the Environmental Composite
Map (Appendix E). Just because land is suitable for development does not mean that
development is to be encouraged at that location. For example, many high and dry properties in
Currituck County are currently in productive agricultural use. To encourage their development
simply because the land is suitable would in many instances, promote urban sprawl, decrease
valuable open space and destroy of an agrarian way of life for the affected farmers and their
families. Thus, while this section focuses on near term development trends in relation to land
suitability, the Land Classification section of this plan sets forth policy choices from an even
broader perspective.
Future Development by Planning Subareas, Next Five Years
Moyock
Development Trend: Moyock’s emergence as a bedroom community for the Tidewater Area of
Virginia will become more pronounced over the next five years. New residential subdivisions will
continue to move into the area, spawning retail services and other non-residential development.
Potential Conflict with Class II or III Land: Some conflict possible--Most of the Moyock Area is
classified as Class II land, largely due to poor soil suitability for septic tanks. This limitation can
be overcome by the use of package sewage treatment plants, which may ultimately join together
into a centralized sewage collection and treatment system. For those developments that employ
on-site septic systems, some conflicts with the capabilities of Class II land are possible.
Gibbs Woods
Development Trend: Gibbs Woods’ relatively remote location, lack of services and substantial
wetlands along the sound and creek shorelines of the area should keep Gibbs Woods out of the
path of substantial development over the next five years.
Potential Conflict with Class II or III Land: No conflict--Most of the interior portion of Gibbs
Woods is classified as Class II land; the coastal margins of this area are Class III. The lack of
development pressure in this area is favorable, given these less suitable classifications.
Shawboro/Crawford
Development Trend: The Shawboro/Crawford area is the largest, most extensive rural area of
Currituck County. While most development is apt to focus in Moyock to the north and the
Grandy to Point Harbor area to the south, the rising cost of land throughout much of the County
may prompt some developers to begin looking at more remote properties in locations like
Shawboro and Crawford.
Potential Conflict with Class II or III Land: Little or no conflict -- While most of the area is
shown as Class II, there are significant vacant properties adjoining the area’s roads that are Class
I. Interestingly, while environmental conditions may not preclude development here, the County’s
policies discouraging residential sprawl in this area would work against it.
Courthouse Area
Development Trend: This area is expected to see continued modest growth related primarily to
the local government service function traditionally associated with this area.
Potential Conflict with Class II or III Land: No conflict—The Courthouse area is benefited by
relatively large areas of vacant Class I land, particularly on the east side of Route 168 adjoining

4-9
Section 4: Existing Land Use and Development
the sound. These Class I land areas should be sufficient to accommodate anticipated growth in
this area for the next five years.
Barco/Coinjock/Airport Area
Development Trend: Like the Courthouse area, this area is expected to see continued modest
growth over the next five years. (Upon completion of the proposed Mid-County Bridge
development pressures here will intensify greatly, but that is beyond the timeframe of the next
five years.)
Potential Conflict with Class II or III Land: No conflict—The Barco/Coinjock/Airport Area has
significant acreages of vacant suitable Class I land, particularly adjoining the major roadways
serving the area. These Class I lands should be sufficient to accommodate anticipated growth in
this area for the next five years.
Intersection of Proposed Mid-County Bridge and US Highway 158
Development Trend: Upon completion of the proposed Mid-County Bridge, development
pressures here will intensify significantly, but that is beyond the timeframe of the next five years.
Potential Conflict with Class I orI Land: No conflict—This area is benefited by large tracts of
vacant suitable Class I land, particularly on the east side of Route 158. Pressures to develop these
lands in the next five years should not be great, especially if no firm closure is brought to the
Mid-County Bridge issue during that timeframe.
Grandy Area
Development Trend: This area is second only to the Moyock area in terms of near-term
development pressures. Over the next five years, Grandy will continue to be an attractive location
for relatively affordable housing, when compared to housing costs on the Outer Banks.
Potential Conflict with Class II or III Land: No conflict—Compared to most areas of the
Mainland, Grandy has some of the most extensive areas of vacant Class I soils, meaning that the
area is relatively well suited for development. Class I lands in the Grandy area should be more
than sufficient to accommodate anticipated growth in this area for the next five years.
Jarvisburg Area
Development Trend: The Jarvisburg area is just beginning to feel the pressure for new residential
developments and associated commercial uses. The area has many relatively large tracts of land
in agricultural use that are already cleared, level and well drained.
Potential Conflict with Class II or III Land: Some conflict possible— While much of the area is
shown as Class II, there are significant vacant properties, many now in farmland, that are Class I.
Similar to the Shawboro/Crawford area, environmental conditions may not preclude development
here, but the County’s policies discouraging residential sprawl in this area would work to contain
new development in compact clusters.
Point Harbor Area
Development Trend: The Point Harbor area has traditionally been the bedroom community
offering affordable housing options for workers providing services to the Outer Banks. In recent
years, however, the Point Harbor area has taken on the characteristics of a full service community
in its own right.
Potential Conflict with Class II or III Land: Some conflict possible— While Point Harbor has
sizable land areas in Class I, many of the most suitable land tracts have long since been
developed. Future development, therefore, is likely to move into less favorable Class II areas.
Similar to Moyock, development on these less suitable sites can be accommodated by the use of

4-10
Curri t uc k Co un t y 2 00 6 L an d Use P l an
package sewage treatment plants, which may ultimately join together into a centralized sewage
collection and treatment system.
Corolla Area
Development Trend: While the Corolla area is nearly fully developed, the near-term future of the
area rests largely with the redevelopment of existing properties. As the value of Outer Banks (i.e.
barrier island) real estate has sky rocketed, the economic incentive to tear down and replace first
and second generation beach cottages with much larger structures has grown commensurately.
Potential Conflict with Class II or III Land: Conflict certain.—(See Appendix E) Nearly the entire
Corolla area is shown as Class III on the Environmental Composite Map (Appendix E). The
intensification of land use on existing properties in this area will only add to the inappropriateness
of intensive development in this fragile barrier island ecosystem. Even so, this conflict between
development and land suitability is inherent throughout North Carolina’s barrier island chain. It
appears that efforts to mitigate development impacts through improved building practices and
caps on the size of replacement structures may be the best recourse available.
Carova Area
Development Trend: Unlike the Corolla area, the Carova area has hundreds of previously platted
lots that have not yet been developed. Like the Corolla area, however, fast escalating real estate
values have called for new structures of considerable size. Growth pressures here are tempered
only by the lack of infrastructure (paved roads, centralized water and sewer), the absence of
commercial services, and the unavailability of federally subsidized flood insurance.
Potential Conflict with Class II or III Land: Conflict certain.— As with the Corolla area, all but a
very few small parcels in the Carova area are shown as Class III on the Environmental Composite
Map (Appendix E). The continued development of existing properties in this area, particularly on
previously platted smaller lots, will add to the inappropriateness of development on this low lying
barrier island. The best means of minimizing adverse impacts is by holding firm on policies
against providing infrastructure and commercial services to the area. There should also be a cap
on the size of structures, justified not only by environmental concerns but also by public safety
issues related to inadequate fire suppression capabilities.
Knotts Island
Development Trend: Knotts Island will likely see continued modest residential
development over the next five years.
Potential Conflict with Class II or III Land: Little or no conflict— The heart of the Knotts Island
community is located on the eastern side of the island, where Class I and II lands predominate in
almost equal measure. Much of the island’s early development occurred in Class I areas. Near-
term development will likely continue in the remaining Class I areas, largely due to the
controlling influence of soil suitability for septic systems.
FUTURE LAND USE NEEDS FORECAST
Methodology
There are a number of ways to determine future land use needs in a growing area. Two of the
most commonly used methods involve estimates of (1) population growth relative to land
consumed and (2) building permits issued relative to land consumed. Given the extreme
variability in estimates of seasonal population, the Currituck County Planning Department has

4-11
Section 4: Existing Land Use and Development
chosen to use the building permit method1. In choosing this method, there is greater reliability in
the data. County records show, for example, the precise number of building permits issued for
residential structures by location in the county. In reviewing site plans and subdivision plats, as
well as allowable development densities under the County zoning ordinance, County planners are
able to estimate, with reasonable accuracy, the average lot size or units per acre for new
development within the three subareas of the county: the Mainland, Knotts Island, and the Outer
Banks.

The process of determining future land use needs is therefore as follows:

1. Document residential building permits issued annually in recent years by the three
subareas of the County. (Table 2.18 of this plan provides this documentation.)
2. Determine the average annual number of permits issued by subarea and whether
these annual averages are likely to go up, down, or stay the same over the planning
period. (Table 4.7) (These numbers were determined using an arithmetic mean and
then adjusting the number based on the Planning Department’s working knowledge
of recent trends.)
3. Determine the average gross acreage consumed per residential dwelling unit by
subarea. (Planning Department review of applications submitted in recent years.)
(Table 4.7)
4. Multiply the number of permits issued annually by the gross acreage required per
unit. Multiply this number by five to determine the additional land required per
subarea in five-year increments. (Table 4.7)
5. Using land use data from the past 15 years, determine the percentage of all developed
land consumed by each major land use category. (Table 4.8)
6. Employ the land use percentage by type to calculate non-residential land use relative
to residential land use over the twenty-five year period. (Tables 4.9 and 4.10)
Residential Land Use Needs
Table 4.7 uses the methodology described above to forecast residential land use needs for the
twenty year period from 2005 to 2025.

1 Estimates of persons per seasonal dwelling unit in Currituck County range from a low of 6 to a high of 20
or more persons per “single family” rental house. Most Realtors in the local rental industry point out that
the average household size for rental beach house is closer to the high end than to the low end. Thus, in
determining peak season population levels for Currituck County, a figure of 14 persons is employed. (See
Section 2, Seasonal Population Estimates.) Even so, this variation in seasonal household size points up a
fundamental problem in using population estimates to predict future land use needs in a heavily tourist-
oriented, second home area like Currituck County. It is much easier to accurately calculate the amount of
land needed for future development when building permit data is employed. Under the County’s
development standards, a single family home must be built upon a lot of a specified size or it cannot secure
a building permit. It does not matter whether the structure will ultimately house two persons or twenty; the
same amount of land is required by the zoning ordinance. At the same time, estimates of seasonal
population have their place in determining demand for services and infrastructure. Those estimates are set
forth in Section 2 of this document.

4-12
Curri t uc k Co un t y 2 00 6 L an d Use P l an
Table 4.7 Future Land Needs for Residential Development During the Period 2005 to 2025

Avg # of
residential
permits
issued/year
1998-2003
Avg
acreage
required
/dwelling
unit
Gross
acreage
required
annually
Gross
acreage
required
2005 to
2010
Gross
acreage
required
2010 to
2015
Gross
acreage
required
2015 to
2020
Gross
acreage
required
2020 to
2025
TOTAL
acreage
required
2005 to
2025
Mainland 310 2.0 620 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 12,400
Knotts Is. 20 3.0 60 300 300 300 300 1,200
Outer Banks 200 0.33 66 330 330 330 330 1,320
Totals 530 -- 746 3,730 3,730 3,730 3,730 14,920

Non-Residential Land Use Needs for the Period 2005 to 2025
This section takes the data related to residential land use needs and uses that information to
estimate future non-residential land use needs. The premise for these estimates is that in any
community, there tends to be a relatively consistent proportion of the total developed land area in
various land use categories. In many communities, for example, it would not be unusual for
residentially developed areas to make up about 75% of the total developed land area. In the case
of Currituck County, that percentage runs closer to about 78%.

Table 4.8 below summarizes developed acreages by land use category in Currituck County over
the past 15 years.

Table 4.8 Existing Land Use In Development, 1990 to 20052
Land Use
Category3
Acres
1990
Acres
1995
Acres
2005
% of
Acres
1990
% of
Acres
1995
% of
Acres
2005
Residential 4,875 6790 14,083 78% 81% 78%
Commercial 409 535 1,539 7% 6% 9%
Industrial 54 56 500 1% 1% 3%
Other 875 1059 1943 14% 12% 11%
TOTALS 6213 8440 18,065 100% 100% 100%

For the purposes of calculating future land use needs, this plan assumes that the most recent land
use percentages for 2005 will remain roughly constant over the twenty-year planning period.
Table 4.9 below takes the residential land use needs calculated previously and projects non-

2 The figures for 1990 and 1995 are from Table 5A in the 1997 Draft Land Use Plan for Currituck County.
The figures for 2005 are from Table 4.1 of this plan. Two figures from Table 4.1 have been adjusted to
match the format for estimating existing land use acreages as employed in the 1997 plan. The institutional
category in Table 4.1, for example, includes extensive acreage in natural heritage sites, while Table 5A
from the 1997 plan did not. Also, the industrial category in Table 4.1 includes the sizeable acreage of the
County Airport, while Table 5A from the 1997 plan did not. These adjustments have been made in the
calculations.

3 While Map 4.1 Existing Land Use indicates a wider variety of land use categories, it should be noted that
Agriculture is not included in Tables 4.8, 4.9, and 4.10 because land in active cultivation is considered
undeveloped is therefore not considered when identifying land currently developed or required for future
development. In addition lands identified as Institutional and Other on the Map are combined within the
Other category within the Tables.

4-13
Section 4: Existing Land Use and Development
residential land use needs based on these percentages.

Table 4.9 Projected Land Use In Development, 2010 to 2025
Land Use
Category
% of
Developed
Land
Acres
2005
Acres
2010
Acres
2015
Acres
2020
Acres
2025
Square
Miles
2025
Residential 78% 14,083 17,813 21,524 25,273 29,003 45.3
Commercial 9% 1,625 2,055 2,484 2,916 3,346 5.2
Industrial 3% 542 685 828 972 1,115 1.7
Other 11% 1,986 2,512 3,035 3,564 4,090 6.4
TOTALS 100% 18,065 22,837 27,595 32,401 37,183 58.1

Thus, if the development pattern, pace and density of growth of the past 15 years were to hold
true for the next 20 years, the amount of developed land in Currituck County would more than
double. Stated another way, for every one of the roughly 18,000 acres of developed land in
Currituck County today, an additional acre of developed land would be required by 2025,
bringing the total developed acreage in the County to over 37,000 acres in 2025. Thus, in the
absence of growth management policies to the contrary, it is expected that some 58 square miles
of Currituck County would be in some form of development by 2025. (See TOTAL of last
column to right, above)

Finally, Table 4.10 below takes the total projected land use in development from Table 4.9 above
and calculates the additional acreage needed for development in each major land use category by
five-year increments.

Table 4.10 Additional Land Area Needed for Development, 2005 to 2020
Land Use
Category
Additional
land needed
2005-2010
Additional
land needed
2010-2015
Additional
land needed
2015-2020
Additional
land needed
2020-2025
Total added
land needed
2005-2025
Residential 3,730 3,711 3,749 3730 14,920
Commercial 430 429 432 430 1721
Industrial 143 143 144 143 573
Other 526 523 529 526 2104
TOTALS 4,829 4,806 4,854 4829 19,318
All figures are in acres of land needed if present development trends continue and the population
continues to increase in keeping with the Medium Growth Scenario discussed in Section 2:
Population, Housing and Economy.

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
Section 5: Community Facilities Analysis
5-1
SECTION 5: COMMUNITY FACILITIES ANALYSIS
INTRODUCTION
This section of the Land Use Plan analyzes the existing and planned capacity and adequacy of
Currituck County’s water, wastewater and transportation systems. This section is also meant to
evaluate the location and adequacy of facilities to serve the existing and planned population and
economic base and to protect environmental factors such as water quality and to guide land
development. Maps of these systems are also provided in Appendix E.
WATER SYSTEMS
Currituck County’s water supply system is composed of 16 individual facilities with three (3) of
these being County Public systems. All of these facilities are listed below. Currituck County
operates the Currituck Mainland Water Department, Southern Outer Banks Water System, and
the Ocean Sands Water and Sewer District (OSWSD). The other systems are private entities
providing service to individual developments or neighborhoods. These private systems were
designed and constructed to meet the finite demands of the planned developments that have been
or are nearly complete and were not designed for future expansions. A listing of all of these water
systems is provided below:

Mainland Systems
Currituck Mainland Water Department (County)
Universal (Orchard) Park
Bells Island Campground
Ponderosa Mobile Home Park
Sentara Nursing Home
Currituck Shores

Knotts Island Water Systems
Anchor Christian Retreat
Sandy Point Resort

Outer Banks Water Systems1
Ocean Sands Water and Sewer District (OSWSD-County))
Southern Outer Banks Water System (County)
Corolla Light PUD
Monteray Shores Phases 1and 2
Buck Island
The Currituck Club
Pine Island

Operational and engineering information is readily available for the county-operated systems,
which are shown on the Water and Sewer Systems Map in Appendix E. These systems are
described below.

The difficulty in assessing future demands for central water based on population growth
particularly for the Mainland is that existing development is not required to connect to this

1 Monteray Shores, Buck Island, Corolla Light, The Currituck Club, and Pine Island are served by Carolina
Water
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
5-2
system. However current regulations require that new development within a prescribed distance
from the distribution system connect to the County’s system. Because the system is relatively
new and because the ground water for residential wells is generally good, the option of
connecting at a monthly cost is hard to predict with any level of certainty. As a result there are no
“planned service areas” for County water. Given the medium growth projection of 36,800 people
in 2025 discussed in Section 2 and the County’s average of 2.61 people per household (2000
Census) it can be estimated that approximately 7,000 new households will be established between
2000 and 2025. It is further estimated that each household uses approximately 200 gallons of
water per day. Multiplying the projected number of households by the average daily residential
water usage translates into a need for the County to produce approximately 1,400,000 additional
gallons of water per day by 2025 not including commercial or industrial users. Currently the
central distribution line follows US-158 and NC 168 and as opportunities present themselves for
expansions into new areas the County and development interest will jointly make improvements
to the system.
Water Services in the Mainland Subarea
The Currituck Mainland Water Department began providing centralized water service to the
northern and central portions of the Mainland in 1990. Central water service has since been
extended to the southern end of the Mainland. The system consists of 28 6-inch and 8-inch
groundwater supply wells located at its Maple water plant site.

In 2002, there were 3,914 metered connections, 1% (10) of the connections was institutional, 7%
(289) of the connections were commercial, and the remaining 92% (3,615) were residential.
According to the 2002 Water Quality Report, the system had no violations and drinking water
met or exceeded all federal and state requirements.

In 2003, the average daily use was 0.71 MGD and the peak use was 1.15 MGD. The average
daily use represented 75% of the available supply. In 2003, the peak daily demands exceeded the
water treatment supply for four months from June through September. Beginning in 2004, the
system began purchasing an additional 0.2 MGD (million gallons per day) from Camden County.
The total available water supply from these 28 wells and Camden County is 1.1 MGD. The total
finished storage capacity of the system is 2.3 MGD. With the additional water purchased from
Camden County, the average daily use in 2004 represents 65% of the available supply. During
the spring and summer of 2006 there was a spike in water consumption causing the County to halt
water connections for a period of 9 months. As of June 2006 the average daily flow equaled
949,009 gallons per day or 95% of capacity and the maximum daily flow equaled 1,462,639
gallons per day (5/30/06) or 140% of plant capacity. Approximately 75% of the water demand is
in the northern portion of the County (north of the Intercoastal Waterway). It is anticipated that
future growth will result in a similar distribution of water flow in the County.

Projections regarding future supply and demand are currently being evaluated and may result in
updated projections being released in 2005. According to current projections, demand is expected
to grow rapidly by 2020, with peak daily demands expected to exceed the water treatment plant
capacity by 2010. From 2003 – 2007 the system has contracted to purchase 0.2 MGD from
Camden County to alleviate demand, which represents a short-term solution. The system has also
requested help with a leak detection plan; 15% of the water supply was unaccounted for in 2001.

According to the Environmental Assessment for the Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant
completed by Hobbs, Upchurch and Associates using the high growth scenario average daily
demand for the water system will be 3,013,952 million gallons with a peak daily demand of
Section 5: Community Facilities Analysis
5-3
4,520,928 million gallons per day. The County is currently formulating a master plan for the
water system to address future water demand.

Future plans include constructing a 5.0 MGD Reverse Osmosis (RO) Treatment Plant by 2010 to
draw water from deep wells in the Lower Yorktown Aquifer, which is high in chlorides. Further
evaluation of the system and projected growth of the County may result in changes to the size of
the proposed plant. The major limiting issue to this new treatment plant is obtaining a wastewater
discharge permit. For the permit to be issued, both the state and Currituck County must
satisfactorily address plans for brine discharge into North River. The cost of the Reverse
Osmosis Treatment Plant is estimated at $10 to $15 million.
Water Services in the Beach Subarea
The Southern Outer Banks Water System (SOBWS) with a treatment capacity of 2 million
gallons per day is also part of the Currituck County water system. The treatment plant went into
service on March 23, 2005. The plant has both reverse osmosis as well as conventional treatment
capabilities. The system includes deep wells for RO treatment and shallow wells, primarily from
the Ocean Sands system, for conventional treatment.

The SOBWS has a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for
backwash discharge into the Atlantic Ocean. The discharge system consists of a dual 8”
perforated pipe system placed approximately 15 feet below the ocean floor and approximately
250 feet off shore. The discharge pipe was constructed by horizontally drilling from behind the
primary dune to eliminate surface damage to the dune and beach.

The system’s service area includes the 1,100 customers in the SOBWS System (Ocean Sands A,
B, & C, Whalehead Section, Corolla Village, Ocean Hill Section 1, and the Villages of Ocean
Hill). The plant serves 950 customers in the Ocean Sands Water and Sewer District. The plant
also serves 900 customers in Monteray Shores and Corolla Light under a six month contract that
was signed with Carolina Water Service in June 2006 and has two six month extensions. At its
peak over the July 4th holiday in 2006 the plant was at 93 percent capacity.

The Ocean Sands Water and Sewer District (OSWSD) is also part of the Currituck County water
system. This system has five shallow wellfields with a total capacity as of 2004 of approximately
500gpm (gallons per minute). The existing treatment plant was running at approximately 90%
capacity in the summer of 2003 with approximately 915 connections. This plant was taken out of
service in the fall of 2004 upon the completion of the Southern Outer Banks Water System
(SOBWS). The OSWSD wells furnish raw water to the SOBWS plant, which will in turn treat the
water and return the equivalent amount to the OSWSD for consumption. Additional wellfields
will be added as needed from the developer of Ocean Sands as growth requires. The current
OSWSD service district has approximately 1,161 potential residential customers. There are only
residential customers at this time. Total customer base at build out of OSWSD is projected to be
approximately 2,852 equivalent residential customers.

There is no county-owned or privately operated central water service in the northern section of
the Outer Banks. Water service is provided by individual wells.
Water Services in the Knotts Island Subarea
There are two small water systems on Knotts Island to serve the Anchor Christian Retreat and the
Sandy Point Resort. Neither system is operated by Currituck County. The majority of Knotts
Island is served by individual wells. Additionally there is no desire from the residents of Knotts
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
5-4
Island for central water as demonstrated in previous opinion polls and most recently in the Land
Use Plan meetings.
SEWER SYSTEMS
There are no large central sewer systems in Currituck County. However, there are 9 large surface
sewage treatment plants and 64 on-site wastewater treatment systems that serve individual
developments on the Mainland and in the southern section of the Outer Banks. There are no large
surface sewage treatment plants in the northern portion of the Outer Banks or in Knotts Island, or
extensive sections of the Mainland. These areas are primarily served by individual septic systems.
The large surface sewage treatment plants are listed below:

Sewer Services in the Mainland Subarea
Carolina Village MHP (60,000 gpd capacity)
Moyock Commons Shopping Center (40,000 gpd capacity)
Mill Run / Eagle Creek (350,000 gpd capacity)
Maple Prison
New Town Sewer System (CDBG Grant) (15,000 gpd capacity)
Sewer Services in the Beach Subarea
Villages at Ocean Hill
Corolla Light Plant #1
Monteray Shores
Ocean Sands Water and Sewer District
Currituck Club / Pine Island
More Details on Sewage Disposal in Currituck County
The Ocean Sands Water and Sewer District wastewater plant is the only large surface sewage
treatment plan operated by Currituck County and is the only system that has readily available
operational and engineering information. It has a current capacity of 500,000 gpd (gallons per
day) and operated at approximately 80% capacity during the summer of 2003. Its treated
wastewater is discharged by a high rate infiltration system, which is common on the southern
Outer Banks. It serves the same customer base as the water plant described above. The existing
plant has the capacity to handle its current service area of approximately 1,161 customers. This
service area represents approximately 41% of the total 2,852 equivalent residential customers at
build out. The timing and location of future expansions will be affected by land the developer is
required to provide for this purpose and the timing of the development of the last two large areas
(Sections G and T). A study is now underway by the County to evaluate the consolidation and /or
centralization of the existing PUD private systems. The study will also consider providing service
to unsewered areas, which are Sections A, B, and C of Ocean Sands; Whalehead Beach; Corolla
Village Area; and Section 1 of Ocean Hill.

In addition to the large surface sewage treatment plants, there are 64 large underground septic
systems in Currituck County. The combined permitted capacity of the 64 systems is very limited
at 294,042 gallons per day.

There are two (2) private wastewater treatment systems currently in violation of their State
Division of Water Quality Permits. The first is on the Mainland and serves Carolina Mobile
Home Park. The Notice of Violation was issued in May 2001 for excessive ponding and improper
operation and maintenance. County Planning has been working with the owner and the
inspections department to reduce the number of units with the park. The second violation is on
the Outer Banks and is the Monteray Shores Wastewater Treatment Plant. The plant is exceeding
Section 5: Community Facilities Analysis
5-5
its capacity to treat the wastewater and a moratorium was established by D.W.Q. in January 2002.
Recently plans are being prepared to address this by expanding the plant and relying on re-use
standards for disposal.

Soils with severe septic system limitations dominate the County. The extent of these soils is
depicted on the Soil Suitability for Septic Systems Map in Appendix E. In the absence of central
sewer service, the County must rely upon individual septic systems to accommodate
development. Failing septic systems are also a problem. On the Mainland, the Coinjock Canal
tends to be the dividing line, with the northern section experiencing more septic failures than
those areas located south of the canal. Lack of sewer and severe soil limitations limit the potential
for growth.

In 2001, Hobbs, Upchurch and Associates completed a Centralized Sewer System Feasibility
Study for the Mainland. At the time of that study it was anticipated that the majority of the
growth in the County would take place in the Moyock area. Given the poor quality of the soils in
that area the consultant assumed that any public wastewater infrastructure investment would take
place in the northern portion of the County. The study estimates system demand in the service
area at an average of 4,648 gallons per month per residential customer, 2,500 gallons per month
fir small businesses with no food preparation facilities, 7,500 gallons per month for medium sized
businesses including food preparation, and 100,000 gallons per month for significant users such
as Southland and Moyock Elementary School. The treatment system identified in the study
included lagoon and spray irrigation. Depending upon the service area chosen within Moyock,
the cost of the system in 2001 dollars ranged from $4.8 million to $11.8 million. It can be
assumed that given the anticipated growth in the southern portion of the County a similar system
would be considered.

In summary, the vast majority of the County is served by individual on-site wastewater systems
while conversely a remarkably small percentage (less than 5%) of the population is served by
community wastewater. The County does not anticipate that percentage to change appreciably as
it develops and therefore provision of public wastewater is not planned for the future.
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS
Thoroughfare Plans
The 1988 Currituck County Thoroughfare Plan is the most recent adopted transportation plan for
the County. Although a plan was prepared in 1999, it was not adopted. The 1988 plan
recommends improving and widening US 158 from Barco to Point Harbor and NC 168 from
Barco to the Virginia state line. These projects have been accomplished. It also recommends
widening Wright Memorial Bridge to 4 lanes or looking at alternatives such as a ferry or new
bridge. The bridge has since been widened and a study is under way to determine the location of a
new bridge from Coinjock to Corolla. The 1988 plan also recommends widening NC 12 to three
lanes from Dare County to Corolla. This has not been completed.

The 1988 Thoroughfare Plan recommended the following classification for roads in Currituck
County:
• Minor Arterials are US 158 and NC 168
• Major collector roads are NC 34 from Camden County to NC 168, NC 615 from the ferry
landing on Knott’s Island to the Virginia line, SR 1140 from US 158 to SR 1137 at
Aydlett, a proposed bridge from Aydlett to Corolla, and NC 12 from Dare County to
Corolla.
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
5-6
• Minor collector roads include NC 3, SR 1131, SR 1142, SR 1246, SR 1242, SR 1222, SR
1227, SR 1218, and SR 1147.
Bridges
The 1988 plan identified 13 bridges that were functionally obsolete. The 1999 plan identified 6
bridges that were functionally obsolete and 8 bridges that were structurally deficient. Most of the
bridges identified in 1999 are the same bridges identified in 1988. Only two of the bridges
identified in 1988 were repaired or replaced before 1999. These are the bridge over Currituck
Sound on SR1313 and the bridge over a canal on SR1217.

A functionally obsolete bridge has below average ratings in approach roadway alignment, under
clearance, deck geometry, waterway adequacy, or structural condition. A structurally deficient
bridge has below average ratings in deck superstructure, substructure, overall structural condition,
or waterway adequacy.

Table 5.1 Functionally Obsolete and Structurally Deficient Bridges (1988 and 1999
Thoroughfare Plans
Bridge Location Identified 1988 Identified 1999 TIP
NC168 at Duckskin Creek X X
NC168 at Cowell’s Creek X X
NC615 at Creek X X B-3445
NC168 at New Bridge Creek X
NC6 15 Ferry Ramp at Currituck Sound X X
SR1242 Ferry Ramp at Currituck Sound X X
SR1232 at Tulls Creek X Z B-4494
SR1222 at Tulls Creek X Z B-2950
SR1228 at Shingle Landing Creek X Z
SR1245 at Coinjock Bay X Z
NC 168 at Guinea Mill Run Z
NC168 at Roland Creek X Z
NC168 at Shingle Landing Creek Z
SR1222 at Shingle Landing Creek X Z B-4094
X = Functionally Obsolete, Z = Structurally Deficient

Capacity and Traffic Volume
A 1995 analysis of road capacity in Currituck County revealed none was over capacity although
US 168 was very close to the capacity for a two-lane road. The widening of NC 168 to a five-lane
roadway has remedied this situation.

An analysis of expected conditions in 2025 reveals three road segments that will exceed capacity.
These are US 158 from Camden County to NC 168, US 158 from NC 168 to the Wright
Memorial Bridge, and NC 168 from US 158 to the Virginia state line. The first deficiency will be
remedied by Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) project R-2574, which consists of the
widening of US 158. The construction of the Mid-Currituck Bridge will alleviate congestion on
the southernmost portion of US 158.

Section 5: Community Facilities Analysis
5-7
Table 5.2 1999 and 2002 Traffic Volumes
Road Location 1999 2002
NC168 Just south of SR1229 (north of Moyock) 15000 22000
SR1228 East of NC168 (in Moyock) 700 720
SR1228 West of NC168 (in Moyock) 820 1100
NC168 South of SR1216 (in Moyock) 13000 20000
SR1214 Near intersection with SR1222 420 720
SR1222 Near SR1232 2100 2100
SR1222 South of SR 1239 1800 1800
SR1239 Near SR1222 600 740
SR1202 Near Snowden 160 230
NC168 North of Sligo 16000 16000
NC168 Between SR1203 and SR1232 17000 12000
SR1232 North of NC168 740 930
NC34 South of Sligo 3300 5500
NC34 West of SR 1205 3000 4600
SR1205 Between NC34 and SR 1147 90 110
SR1222 Just north of intersection with NC 168 1800 2200
SR1246 Near Maple 1200 1300
NC168 In Barco (north of US 158) 16000 18000
SR1148 Just south of intersection with Us 158 170 190
SR1147 Just north of intersection with Us 158 670 850
US158 Between SR 1200 and SR 1246 5600 7700
US158 South of intersection with NC168 16000 18000
SR1405 Just south of Coinjock 1000 1100
SR1140 East of US 158 890 1100
SR1139 Near intersection with SR1140 680 800
US158 Just north of Bertha 14000 15000
NC136 East of intersection with SR 1136 230 330
SR1136 North of NC 136 near Poplar Branch 160 160
SR1135 Between SR 1136 and NC136 940 1000
SR1175 Near intersection with SR1131 780 800
US158 Between SR1421 and SR1127 14000 18000
SR1124 Near US158 190 220
US158 Just north of SR1120 14000 18000
SR1118 North of SR1121 160 270
US158 Just south of SR 1111 15000 19000
US158 Near Point Harbor before bridge 16000 21000
Source: NCDOT 1999, 2002

Average daily traffic volume has either increased or remained the same between 1999 and 2002
for all observed road segments except for NC 168 between SR1203 and SR1232 near Sligo
(Table 5.2). Traffic volume on NC 168 has increased greatly in the northern part of the county
around Moyock. Traffic volume on monitored areas of NC34 has also increased. A consistent
increase of between 4,000 and 5,000 vehicles per day has occurred at monitored segments of US
158 after it intersects with NC 168.

2004-2010 Transportation Improvement Program (NC DOT for Currituck County

Projects included in the TIP is listed below:

Road Improvements
R-2574 US 168: Widen to multi-lanes from east of NC34 at Belcross in Camden
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
5-8
County to NC158.
R-4429 SR1222 Tulls Creek Rd: Upgrade existing roadway from NC168 to north
of SR1232 and from SR1213 to SR1216.

Bridge Replacements
B-2950 SR1222: Replace bridge #4 over Tulls Creek
B-3445 NC615: Replace bridge #7 over creek
B-4094 SR1222: Replace bridge #28 over Shingle Landing Creek
B-4494 SR1232: Replace bridge #3 over Tulls Creek

Study Area
R-2576 New route and structure from Coinjock to Corolla (Mid-Currituck
Bridge)

In addition, the 2004-20 10 TIP includes work on bulkheads, renovation of the rest area south of
Coinjock on US158, and construction of a new rest area on US 158.

Impact of Planned Transportation Improvements on Growth Levels and Development
Patterns

There are three planned or proposed transportation improvements that promise to have an
especially significant impact on growth levels and development patterns in Currituck County. In
order of magnitude, they are:

Mid-County Bridge
The Mid-County Bridge will have a huge influence on development patterns throughout much of
Currituck County:
• Approaches north and south of the intersection of the proposed bridge landing and US
158 will come under intense pressure for commercial development.
• US 158 south of the new bridge intersection will likely become a bypass for those headed
to Carova from the south who wish to avoid the more congested areas of NC 12 through
Duck and Corolla. This bypass function will add even more pressure for commercial
development along 158.
• Demand for additional residential development in the Grandy area will intensify.
Commercial services will follow.
• The Barco/Coinjock/Airport area will likely become the main community center for the
mid-section of Mainland Currituck County. It will likely assume a role similar to the role
that Point Harbor plays for Dare County’s Outer Banks.
• Pressure for additional development in Corolla and especially Carova will increase
dramatically with improved access to these two areas.

NC 168 Bypass, West of Moyock
The NC 168 Bypass will have a major impact on the northwestern and central parts of Currituck
County:
• Properties near the new Bypass, just west of Moyock will witness increased pressure for
both residential and commercial development, as this new roadway will improve access
for additional “bedroom community” development.
• The bypass will send large volumes of traffic through the currently rural, western part of
the county, effectively opening up extensive, open land to development interests.
• Intersections of NC 34 and US 158 with the proposed bypass will also likely result in
Section 5: Community Facilities Analysis
5-9
greater demand for both residential and commercial development.
• Properties near the intersection of US 158 and existing NC 168 will become prime real
estate, as both branches of NC 168 will merge together here.
• The Barco/Coinjock/Airport area’s role as the principle community center for the mid-
section of the Mainland will be further strengthened by this three-pronged traffic pattern
coming together at Barco.

Widening of NC 168 and US 158 South of Barco to 7 Lanes
The widening of the mainland’s only true north-south travel corridor will intensify the demand
for development with immediate access to this roadway:
• Where communities once straddled the 168/158 roadway, the greater width of the
pavement will effectively divide areas east and west of the highway into separate
communities.
• Commercial development along this corridor will continue to intensify.
• Residential developments will seek to locate with convenient access to the improved
traffic moving capacity of the widened highway.
Widening of NC 34 from Camden to NC 158
The widening of this primary east-west travel corridor will intensify the demand for development
with immediate access to this roadway. The demand for commercial zoning along the corridor
will likely increase substantially as will the interest in residential development thereby
dramatically altering the rural character of the area.
STORMWATER / DRAINAGE
Responsibility for Stormwater and Drainage
Like most counties in North Carolina, Currituck County does not maintain stormwater
infrastructure. All such structures associated with public roadways are maintained by the North
Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT). The NCDOT generally maintains records
through County Maintenance Engineers for all culverts (but not other stormwater system
components) in the systems they maintain. The location of these, however, is generally only
referenced by a sketch and estimated mileage to nearest intersections. Similarly, Currituck
County does not regulate stormwater systems owned by private entities as these systems are
regulated by NCDENR under the Division of Water Quality (D.W.Q.).

The Albemarle Soil and Water Conservation District - Currituck Field Office (Division of Soil
and Water Conservation) has taken on an active role in the maintaining and improving drainage
by obtaining grants and by reviewing development proposals on a monthly basis. While D.W.Q.
regulations emphasize the retention of the first inch to two inches of rainfall, the County U.D.O.
regulations require development to address the 10-year storm event or the first 4.3 inches of
rainfall. By requiring developers to submit detailed engineered drainage plans demonstrating that
“post development” run-off volumes will not exceed “pre-development” conditions, the County is
protecting adjacent water quality from both normal rainfall events as well as extraordinary ones.
Existing Drainage Problems by Subarea
Mainland
Due to a large variety of soil types many of which are clay especially in the northern portion of
the County Mainland coupled with a high seasonal water table has resulted in a number of both
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
5-10
acute and chronic drainage problems. The acute problems, such as minor flooding of parking lots,
ponding of water on private roads and driveways usually occur when design storm conditions
have been exceeded. Chronic problems on the other hand have been addressed by the creation of
“Drainage Service Districts” by the County. By establishing these districts everyone within a
specified watershed shares the cost of maintaining drainage within that watershed through a fee
system. On the Mainland there are three (3) such districts:

1. The Guinea Mill Watershed Improvement Service District. This serves the Guinea Mill Canal
area that has been in existence for over 100 years to provide drainage for timbering of the
Great Dismal Swamp. The basin includes eight (8) major residential subdivisions and
approximately 2,000 acres of cropland that is quickly being converted to residential uses
making Guinea Mill Canal an important utility with a need for yearly maintenance. Because
of the identified need for a consistent and cohesive management of stormwater, flood control
and protection for water quality in Tulls Creek and Currituck Sound, the Guinea Mill Service
District was established in February 2000.

2. Moyock Watershed Improvement Service District. Much like the Guinea Mill Canal area, the
Moyock area is rapidly changing from rural farming community to a more urbanized setting
resulting in more stormwater run-off from more impervious surfaces. Traditionally the
farmers and landowners have maintained the drainage but with the recent changes taking
place this is no longer the case. With the lack of maintenance resulting in chronic flooding
and no entity responsible for overseeing these drainage ways, this service district was created
by the County in June 2002. The resident population within this district is approximately 850
people with approximately 325 homes on 405 parcels. (Source: Currituck County Soil
Conservation Office).

3. Northwest Watershed Improvement Service District. This community is located on Northwest
Backwoods Road between Carolina Village and the Virginia State line and is a mix of
residential and agricultural uses which experiences flooding problems due to its flat
topography and poorly drained soils. While NCDOT has made few drainage improvements,
farmers cannot justify improving this drainage system alone particularly with more and more
of the area transforming from agricultural to residential uses. The resident population is
approximately 160 people with about 64 houses on 73 parcels. There is approximately 1,000
acres of cropland and forestland in this district.

There are no drainage districts in the southern part of the mainland as soil conditions are more
sandy and infiltration and storage capacities of the soil are greater. In addition, there are no
known outfalls or point sources of discharges of stormwater or wastewater. Currituck County
through its zoning and drainage regulations prohibits any stormwater discharges into any Sound,
rivers, tributaries or streams. (Source: UDO Article 6, Section 615)
Outer Banks
Reoccurring stormwater problems ensue in this subarea from a high seasonal ground water table
in conjunction with low-lying coastal areas (elevations + 4 feet M.S.L.) This coupled with the
fact that there are no identified outfalls to allow stormwater to be diverted to either the ocean or
the sound has created isolated but chronic flooding problems. Nowhere is this more pronounced
than in the Whalehead Subdivision that represents the fourth drainage district in the County.

Whalehead Service District. This subdivision was platted in 1972 with little thought about
stormwater and the necessary infrastructure to support it. Streets and intersections throughout the
Section 5: Community Facilities Analysis
5-11
subdivision are flooded and often impassable after periods of moderate rainfall. Low lying vacant
lots that once held stormwater are presently being filled and built upon which displaces the water
out into the streets and onto other lots. Of the total 864 lots, approximately 700 are currently built
upon. Health issues have arisen with septic tanks and wells being flooded, however, County
central water is currently being installed to serve this area. With the District having been created
in May 2003, engineered stormwater solutions are now under review by the Whalehead Advisory
Board and full implementation is expected in the next four to six years.

Similar but dispersed stormwater flooding issues are also prevalent in the Carova section of the
beach. The unimproved rights-of-way, many of which have severe depressions, are acting like
stormwater retention basins, as the seasonal water table is high and no outfalls exist.
Knotts Island
Similar to the lower Mainland peninsula of the County, Knotts Island is also plagued by low-
lying depressed areas, a high seasonal water table and few if any outlets to Currituck Sound.
There are no County drainage service districts on the island. Stormwater is generally conveyed to
NCDOT rights-of-ways and swales that often results in acute flooding problems when normal
rainfall events are exceeded.
Stormwater System Requirements Subject to EPA’s Stormwater Phase II Final
Rules
In response to concerns about stormwater impacts on water quality nation-wide, the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, working in cooperation with environmental agencies at the
state level, has been in the process of implementing stormwater management legislation. The law
is known as NPDES (National Pollution Discharge Elimination System) Stormwater Phase II.
This stormwater management initiative requires, among other things, treatment of stormwater
runoff so that it does not pollute receiving surface waters. Compliance with the new law may
have a sweeping effect on the way in which subdivisions, shopping centers and new roads in
designated communities are built and maintained.

Under the legislation, there are three ways in which a community may become designated as a
participating local government: (1) automatic designation under the federal rules (2) designation
by the state and (3) designation by petition of a third party. At the time of this writing, the
following map was available from the State Division of Water Quality, showing those areas of the
state designated for mandatory participation under the Phase II program:
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
5-12

Thus, Currituck County has not been designated under any of the three applicable methods. While
local governments may volunteer to participate in the Phase II program, none have reportedly
done so to date, due to the costs involved in implementing such a program. For the sake of
providing appropriate information about the Phase II requirements, however, the following is an
overview of the program requirements:

EPA regulation (40CFR 122.34) requires permittees (e.g. local governments) at a minimum to
develop, implement, and enforce a stormwater program designed to reduce the discharge of
pollutants from the MS4 to the maximum extent practicable. The stormwater management
program must include these six minimum control measures:

1. Public education and outreach on stormwater impacts
2. Public involvement/participation
3. Illicit discharge detection and elimination
4. Construction site stormwater runoff control
5. Post-construction stormwater management in new development and redevelopment
6. Pollution prevention/good housekeeping for municipal operations

The program is intended to be carried out in two steps: (1) plan preparation and (2) plan
implementation. Most work to date has been in the area of plan preparation.
Schools
Education is a vital part of our community. Currituck County is proud have one of the State's top
performing school systems. The Board of Commissioners is responsible for providing funding for

2 Source of map and program requirements: NC Division of Water Quality website (3/24/05):
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/NPDES_Phase_I_Stormwater_Program.htm#Phase2_quick_links

2
Section 5: Community Facilities Analysis
5-13
facilities for the Currituck County Public School System and supplements the state's funding for
school operations. There are currently five (5) elementary schools, two (2) middle schools, and
one (1) high school located throughout the County. The high school and Currituck Middle
School are located in Barco. Central Elementary is located in nearby Maple while JP Knapp
elementary is located in Currituck. A middle school and elementary school each are located in
Moyock, one elementary school is located in Poplar Branch Township, and a fifth elementary
school is located on Knotts Island. Two new elementary schools are planned for construction;
one in the southern end of the County and the other in the Shawboro area at a cost of
approximately $34 million. Construction of a new high school is anticipated within the next ten
(10) years estimated to cost approximately $40 million. The County relies upon an Adequate
Public Facilities Ordinance to ensure its ability to provide schools is not outpaced by the rate of
development.

Within close proximity of Currituck County are several higher education institutions. These
universities and colleges include Elizabeth City State University, Old Dominion University, and
College of the Albemarle. Elizabeth City State University and The College of the Albemarle are
the two (2) closest institutions. The College of the Albemarle is a community college that serves
Currituck and six other counties. COA's three campuses are a short drive away in Elizabeth City,
Dare County, and Chowan County. The college offers a wide variety of educational programs and
services. For over 100 years, Elizabeth City State University has provided quality education for
students in northeast North Carolina. The university offers baccalaureate programs in the basic
arts and sciences and in selected professional and pre-professional areas. The University's
Graduate Center, in conjunction with other constituent institutions, also provides master's level
programs for advanced professional study. ECSU is located in Elizabeth City.
Public Safety
In carrying out its responsibility for ensuring public safety, the County operates a Sheriff’s
Department as well as an Emergency Management Department, and funds the volunteer fire
departments.

The Currituck County Sheriff’s Office is responsible for a full range of law enforcement and
court related duties. The Sheriff’s Office is comprised of officers assigned to work patrol, serve
civil process, and conduct major crime investigations, drug offense investigations, court security,
as well as hold crime prevention and education training. The duties of the officers are to respond
to emergency and routine calls for service in addition to conducting self-initiated prevention and
detection of law violations, investigate criminal activity, and traffic accidents. The Sheriff’s
Office works cooperatively with the North Carolina State Highway Patrol in an effort to maintain
the safety of all those who travel on the roadways throughout Currituck County.

The Emergency Management Department provides leadership and assistance to reduce the loss of
life and property in Currituck County from a variety of man-made and natural hazards. The
department is responsible for teaching people how to prepare for disasters, coordinating
countywide disaster response, and making sure that disaster assistance is available to all
government agencies, businesses, and citizens of Currituck County.

Another responsibility of the Emergency Management Department is to provide assistance to
managers of various County agencies that play a role in the response and recovery effort. In
addition, the Emergency Management Department maintains the Emergency Operations Plan
(EOP) for the County. This plan describes the concept of emergency operations and assigns
duties and responsibilities to agency heads or organizations, which are either part of, or will serve
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
5-14
in support of, Currituck County government in time of emergency.

The Fire Marshal's office is responsible for enforcing fire prevention codes, performing safety
inspections, reviewing plans for development, fire investigations, public education, public
information, and other related issues. The Fire Marshal also addresses the many diverse hazards
and life safety concerns, including water supplies, hazardous materials, life safety, and fire
investigations.

Since 1985, it has been mandated that all structures -- new and existing -- be periodically
inspected. This excludes one and two family dwellings. The hazards are then listed for the
owner/occupant. It has been estimated that there are approximately 600 facilities in Currituck
County that would fall under this mandate.

There are six (6) volunteer fire departments throughout the county including:
Carova Beach Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.
Corolla Fire and Rescue Squad, Inc.
Crawford Township Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.
Knotts Island Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.
Lower Currituck Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.
Moyock Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.

The fire departments strive to offer the best service possible, which includes updating and
maintaining equipment, fire suppression, fire prevention, auto extrication, and search and rescue.
Department volunteers also assist County Emergency Medical Services staff and are pivotal to
Emergency Management functions in regard to man-made and natural disasters. In addition, they
are constantly staying on the leading edge of new and improved training techniques, logging
thousands of hours of training each year. It is anticipated that as development continues
throughout the county, additional substations will be required, particularly in the areas identified
as full service.

Currituck County Emergency Medical Services (EMS) provides emergency pre-hospital
Advanced Life Support and transportation for citizens and visitors of Currituck County. The
department is staffed by Basic, Intermediate, and Paramedic Medical Technicians. Responds to
calls for EMS and fire related assistance (complemented by the volunteer fire departments). EMS
operates six stations in Moyock, Grandy, Crawford, Lower Currituck, Corolla, and Knotts Island.
Parks and Recreation
The Currituck County Parks and Recreation Department offers citizens an opportunity to develop
their leisure time and interests. Activities that promote the enrichment of life in the community
help to make Currituck a desirable place to live. Recreation offers a creative outlet for developing
physical fitness, sportsmanship, leadership, cultural arts, family unity, and community spirit. The
Department offers youth athletic programs including flag football, tackle football, basketball,
soccer, wrestling, and cheerleading. The Department also offers athletic programs for adults
including adult league softball (men and women) and basketball (open gyms).

The County also operates five (5) public parks including:

• Maple Park and Maple Skate Park located at the Maple Airport Complex
• Veterans Memorial Park on the Intracoastal Waterway in Coinjock
Section 5: Community Facilities Analysis
5-15
• Knotts Island Ruritan Park, located on Brumley Road, Knotts Island
• Walnut Island Park, located at Walnut Island, Grandy
• Sound Park, located in Harbinger

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
S ect i on 6: L an d S uita bilit y An a l ysi s

6 -1
SECTION 6: LAND SUITABILITY ANALYSIS
What is Land Suitability Analysis?
The land suitability analysis (LSA) is a process for identifying land in Currituck County that is most
suitable for development. The analysis is not intended to “rule out” any land or site from development. The
LSA simply ranks land from least suitable to most suitable for development. It is intended to provide this
information to local decision-makers to guide the formulation of local policies.
The LSA is based on consideration of several factors. These include the following:
• Natural features and their capabilities
• Existing development
• Compatibility with existing land uses
• Proximity/availability of community facilities
• Regulatory restrictions on land development
Land Suitability Map
As part of the land suitability analysis, the CAMA Land Use Planning Guidelines require the development
of a Land Suitability Map. (The Land Suitability Map for this plan is located in Appendix E.) The Division
of Coastal Management (DCM), in conjunction with the NC Center for Geographic Information and
Analysis, has provided a geographic information system (GIS)-based model for analyzing land suitability
and development of the LSA map. This system utilizes the suitability factors shown in the table on the
following page.
Suitability Rating System
The LSA model puts land areas into one of four categories: least, low, medium, and high suitability. Areas
that are the most undesirable for development, such as coastal wetlands, are placed into the least suitable
category and cannot be weighted or changed in the model.
The remaining characteristics, such as soil septic suitability or proximity to water lines, are weighted as
important, very important or extremely important in determining suitability. Using a weighting scale, the
local planners and decision-makers can determine the relative importance of these characteristics. The chart
below illustrates the weighting scale.
Relative Importance Numerical Weight
Important 1
Very important 2
Extremely important 3
To develop the local LSA map, the Currituck County Land Use Plan Steering Committee assigned
numerical weights indicating the relative importance of each factor. Table 6.1 represents the factors
included in the analysis, the suitability rating of each factor and the locally assigned weights.
Curri t uc k Co un t y 2 00 6 L an d Use P l an

6 -2
Table 6.1 Currituck County Land Suitability Analysis Weights
Suitability
factor Least
Suitable
Rating
Low
Suitability
Rating
Medium
Suitability
Rating
High
Suitability
Rating
Mainland
Assigned
Weight
Knotts Is.
Assigned
Weight
Outer Bks.
Assigned
Weight
A) Coastal
Wetlands
Inside Outside n/a n/a n/a
B) Exceptional
& Substantial
Noncoastal
Wetlands
Inside

Outside

n/a n/a n/a
C) Estuarine
Waters
Inside Outside n/a n/a n/a
D) Protected
Lands
Inside Outside n/a n/a n/a
E) Beneficial
Noncoastal
Wetlands

Inside

Outside 1 1 3
F) Storm Surge
Areas Inside Outside 1 1 2
G) Soils with
septic
limitations

Severe Moderate Slight 2 2 3
H) Flood
Zones Inside Outside 2 2 3
I) Significant
Natural
Heritage Areas

<500’

>500’ 1 1 1
J) Hazardous
Substance
Disposal Sites

<500’

>500’ 3 3 3
K) NPDES
Sites <500’ >500’ 2 2 2
L)Airports <500’ >500’ 2 1 2
M) Developed
Land >1 mi .5 – 1 mi <.5 mi 2 2 2
N) Primary
Roads >1 mi .5 – 1 mi <.5 mi 2 1 2
O) Water Pipes >.5 mi .25 – .5 mi <.25 mi 2 1 2
P) Sewer Pipes >.5 mi .25 – .5 mi <.25 mi n/a n/a 2
Note: Shaded area “A” through “D” represent development suitabilities as determined by Division of Coastal
Management, while shaded area “M” through “P” represent suitabilities as determined by the County. Factor P)
Sewer Pipes, is listed as n/a for the Mainland, because there are no central sewage facilities there, and n/a for
Knotts Island because there are none present and no desire to have any.
S ect i on 6: L an d S uita bilit y An a l ysi s

6 -3
The suitabilities have been established using the LSA model created by DCM. Factors in rows A
through D are established by DCM as least suitable for development and cannot be weighted.
However, the Steering Committee has determined the importance of each of the other factors
(rows E through P) and assigned weights (1, 2 or 3) to meet local goals and policies. Weights
have been assigned based on the local government’s determination of the importance of each
factor as it relates to suitability to development. Each subarea was processed separately, as
representatives from each subarea chose their own respective weights. Outputs from each subarea
are compiled on Map 6.1 (Appendix E). The map shows four classes of land – least suitable, low
suitability, medium suitability and high suitability. In general, the higher suitability areas are
located on the southern outer banks, on the east side of Knotts Island, from Grandy to Point
Harbor, near Moyock, south of Shawboro and along the shore in and around the community of
Currituck.
Assessment of Land Suitability Map as to Vacant or Underutilized Land that is
Suitable for Development
The Land Suitability Map shows a total of 52,500 acres of land in either the Medium Suitability
or High Suitability rating category. (Collectively, these two categories represent those parts of the
county most suited for development.) Previously, it was determined that, in 2005, there were
18,000 acres of developed land in Currituck County. (See Section 4: Existing Land Use)
Subtracting the existing developed acreage from the acreage in the two most suitable rating
categories (52,500-18,000) yields a remainder of 34,500 acres of vacant land generally suitable
for development. Interestingly, the analysis of future land use needs (Also in Section 4) showed
that an additional 19,000 acres of land will be needed to accommodate new development through
the year 2025. Thus, the amount of land deemed suitable for development should be sufficient to
accommodate anticipated growth for the next twenty years, based on current projections.
It may also be observed that the areas of land suitable (high and medium suitability) for
development (52,500 acres) is less than the amount of land shown as Class I and Class II (65,920)
on the Environmental Composite Map (See Appendix E). This is because the Land Suitability
Map takes additional factors into consideration, mainly, proximity to roads and utilities, making
some areas more “suitable” than others.

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
Section 7: Review of Existing Policies
7-1
SECTION 7: REVIEW OF EXISTING POLICIES
Introduction
The purpose of this section is to review and evaluate the current land use plan and the
implementation of policies contained in the plan. The current “plan of record” is the 1990
Currituck County Land Use Plan, which was locally adopted in June 1991, and certified by the
Coastal Resources Commission in July 1991. The 1990 plan contains approximately 41 policies,
with accompanying implementation strategies. The policies address the Coastal Resources
Commission’s land use planning requirements that were in effect at the time of plan development.
In addition, the plan speaks to other local areas of concern. The following chart represents a
review of the key policies and the strategies of the County’s implementation efforts. Of the 41
Goals and 104 strategies identified in the plan, 73% were considered effective in directing
desirable development patterns, while 12% were considered ineffective and 14% were not
applicable. Note: Under each “goals” statement, one of the following initials is used to indicate
the following: (E) Effective in reaching the goal, (I) Ineffective in reaching the goal, (N/A) Not
applicable as the County had little or no control in realizing the goal.

Goal Strategy Implementation
1. To Encourage the use of citizen advisory groups to
help formulate policies on land use issues facing the
county;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of
Commissioners
TIME FRAME: Ongoing
a. Citizen Advisory Group formulated to evaluate
highway corridor (US 158- NC168) study and
improvements. (1994)
b. Currituck County Farmland Preservation Board
established to protect prime agricultural farmland.
(2001)
c. Currituck County Land Use Plan Steering
Committee appointed to oversee the policy
development of the 2005 CAMA Land Use Plan.
(2003)
2. Have all agencies with tasks outlined in the Land
Use Plan report on an annual basis to the Planning
and Zoning Commission on the status of
implementing strategies.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Agricultural Extension
Office, Soil Conservation Service, Health
Department, and Emergency Services.
TIME FRAME: Annually
No formal structure has been identified that
encourages or requires agencies to report routinely
to the Planning Board.
1.1: To Encourage
Maximum Public
Participation in the
Land Use Planning
Process. (E)
3. Appointments to boards, commissions, and
advisory groups should be bipartisan and represent
all age groups, geographical locations, sex and racial
make-up of the County.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of
Commissioners
TIME FRAME: Ongoing
The Board of Commissioners continues to appoint
a diverse group of individuals to participate on a
variety of boards and advisory groups.
3.1: Expand the
economic base of
Currituck county to
improve employment
opportunities while
ensuring adequate
1. Establish an economic development authority in
order to formalize a plan for expanding the economic
base of Currituck County.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of
Commissioners
TIME FRAME: 1991
The County Economic Development Board,
composed of citizens and business leaders was
established by the Board of Commissioners (1991)
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
7-2
Goal Strategy Implementation
2. Hire an economic development coordinator to
promote economic development and carry out the
plans adopted by the Economic Development
Authority.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of
Commissioners
TIME FRAME: 1992
The County hired an Economic Development
Director and established a County Department
(1991)
3. Recruit only those industries that will not have a
negative impact on Currituck County's fragile
environment (i.e., minimal effect on water quality,
no excessive smoke and noise, etc.)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: ED Board/Coordinator
TIME FRAME: Ongoing
Currituck County continues to pursue “clean
industries” coupled with strong environmental
local regulations which together ensure the
protections of AECs and other features of the
natural environment
4. Have the Board of Adjustment issue conditional
use permits for heavy industry uses and request
disclosure from the industries on environmental
impacts and hazardous materials to be used
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Adjustment
TIME FRAME: Ongoing
The Unified Development Ordinance (UDO)
continues to be amended to require certain
commercial and industrial uses to submit
application to the Board of Adjustment (CUPs)
based on the potential impact to the natural and
man-made environment.
5. Involve the Agricultural Extension Office in
promoting economic development in Currituck
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Agricultural Extension
Office
TIME FRAME: Ongoing
Membership on the Economic Development Board
includes farming and other agricultural interests.
environmental
protection. (I)

6. Consider the location of light industrial, wholesale
and warehouse activities in the northern part of the
County adjacent to as well as remote from Highway
168 provided:
-transportation facilities are adequate to meet the
needs of the use and would not place an undue
burden on local roads;
-the use is adequately buffered by physical and
natural barriers from residential and agricultural uses
and would not detract from the quality of life
enjoyed by neighbors;
-the use would not detract from the rural character of
the area;
-the use has adequate access to utilities and,
preferably, has County water available;
-the use does not locate in an area that is
environmentally sensitive.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of
Commissioners
TIME FRAME: Ongoing
The County Board of Commissioners has rezoned
approximately 200 acres in the northern Moyock
area since 1990 for these uses with an eye toward
meeting or exceeding the specified conditions in
the plan.
3.2: To continue to
support agricultural
uses in those areas
best suited to be
farmed and to
promote agricultural
practices that are
Promote the use of cluster development (Planned
Residential Development - PRD, Open Space
Subdivisions, Planned Unit Development - PUD) in
order to preserve the land best suited for farming.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of
Commissioners
TIME FRAME: Existing
Clustered or “Conservation” style subdivisions are
now mandated for any residential division of
greater than 40 lots (2003). For subdivisions of
less than 40 lots but greater than 20 lots requires
open space proportional to the number of lots
created.
Section 7: Review of Existing Policies
7-3
Goal Strategy Implementation
Promote the use of Best Management Practices and
to encourage less dependence on chemicals.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Soil Conservation
Service
TIME FRAME: Ongoing
Long term “no till” Best Management Practices
have been encouraged and employed for the past
10 years as well as water control structures in farm
fields for the protection of water quality in
adjacent sounds and tributaries
sensitive to the
environment. (E)

Explore potential of Transfer Development Rights
(TDR's) to preserve open space. RESPONSIBLE
AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department
TIME FRAME: 1994
Although the expected time frame to investigate
this approach to protecting prime agricultural
farmland was established for 1994, new efforts, as
directed by the Board of Commissioners will be
reconsidered in 200-6-2007. North Carolina
Statutory Authority is required for this initiative
3.3: To continue to
allow the extraction of
minerals to support
growth provided
extraction activities
have a minimum
impact on the
environment and
surrounding
properties. (E)
Amend the Unified Development Ordinance to limit
the negative impacts mines have on the environment
and surrounding properties (i.e., drainage, erosion,
noise, visual impact, etc.) and allow timely
enforcement by the County in the event of violations.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County
Planning Department
TIME FRAME: 1991

The UDO was amended in 1997 and 2000 to better
protect the environment and surrounding land use
from any negative impacts associated with this
use. Essentially, the UDO requirements now meet
or exceed State Mining Standards for all mines in
excess of one (1) acre.
1. Support the establishment of the Wildlife Museum
through monetary means and staff resources.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of
Commissioners TIME FRAME: 1995

The Outer Banks Center for Wildlife Education
opened in 2006. This facility, established by the
NC Wildlife Recourses Commission is a 20,000
sq. ft. center located between the Whalehead Club
and the Currituck Beach Lighthouse
2. Establish a visitors' center at the proposed Wildlife
Museum to advise tourists on areas of interest in
Currituck County. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:
Board of Commissioners TIME FRAME: 1995

The Outer Banks Center for Wildlife Education
opened in 2006. This facility, established by the
NC Wildlife Recourses Commission is a 20,000
sq. ft. center located between the Whalehead Club
and the Currituck Beach Lighthouse
3. Request the State provide a manned information
center on NC 168 just south of the Virginia state line
at the time the roadway is expanded.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of
Commissioners
TIME FRAME: 1991

Due to State budgetary constraints a Welcome
Center at this location has not become a reality
3.4: Continue to
expand the role
tourism plays in
Currituck County (E)
4. Provide information about Currituck County at the
existing State rest stop facility south of Coinjock.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: County Manager’s
Office TIME FRAME: 1991
The NCDOT Rest Area south of Coinjock has an
abundance of information on Currituck County
1. Improve the quality of the sounds and adjoining
tributaries.
(Policy Stated in Environmental Chapter)
See 7.1, Item 1 – Environment 3.5: Maintain the
economic and
historical significance
of commercial and
recreational fishing
and hunting in
Currituck County. (E)
2. Encourage the preservation of wildlife habitat by
promoting cluster development. RESPONSIBLE
AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department
TIME FRAME: Completed
County adopted “Conservation Subdivision”
regulations as a UDO amendment which preserved
wetlands and wildlife habitat
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
7-4
Goal Strategy Implementation
3. Explore the potential of establishing conservation
easements allowing a landowner to maintain title to
the property but prohibit development of sensitive
areas in exchange for financial consideration.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County
Planning Department
TIME FRAME: 1994
See #2 above
3.6: To ensure
commercial timber
harvesting is done in a
manner that has
minimal impact to the
environment. (N/A)
1. Commercial timber harvesting shall adhere to best
management practices established by the North
Carolina Forest Service and comply with 404
wetland regulations.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: NC Forest Service and
USACE
TIME FRAME: Ongoing
No action taken, but commercial timbering
operations have followed recommended BMPs
1. Implement the recommendations listed in the 1988
Thoroughfare Plan.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: NCDOT
TIME FRAME: Ongoing
The 1988 Thoroughfare Plan is outdated. A 1999
Thoroughfare Plan has been developed by
NCDOT but not yet adopted by the County. Many
of these recommendations have been implemented
in the UDO
2. Amend the Unified Development Ordinance in
order to establish regulations for driveways on
individual property and within subdivisions;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County
Planning Department
TIME FRAME:1991
Amendments to the UDO, particularly Article 9,
Subdivision Standards and Article 3, Streets and
Sidewalks have been adopted regulating the
number and location of curb cuts (January 1996,
June 1998, August 1999, and April 2003)
3. Request that the Department of Transportation
widens the following roads to accommodate bicycle
traffic:

a) Highway 158 from Belcross (Camden County to
Barco),
b) Along NC 12 on the Currituck Outer Banks,
c) On the Mid-County Bridge,
d) NC 615 on Knotts Island,
e) Highway 168 from the Virginia state line to
Barco,
f) Tulls Creek Road (SR 1222);
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of
Commissioners
TIME FRAME: Ongoing

No NCDOT road widening projects for the
purpose of the six (6) names roads. A resolution
requesting the noted improvements be added to the
State’s Transportation Improvement Program was
sent to DOT September 5, 1990. Further follow-
up on bikeway improvements shall be the
responsibility of the Recreation Committee
4.1: To have a
transportation system
that effectively,
efficiently and safely
moves motoring and
bicycle traffic
throughout Currituck
County and that
assures access to
transportation for the
elderly and financially
disadvantaged. (E)

4. Establish a system to ensure all elderly and
financially disadvantaged residents in Currituck
County have access to transportation;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of
Commissioners to establish agency
TIME FRAME: 1991
No system for enhancing transportation for these
groups has occurred
Section 7: Review of Existing Policies
7-5
Goal Strategy Implementation
5. Request the Board of Transportation make site
specific improvements on Highway 168 (i.e., left
turn lanes, deceleration lanes, stop lights, etc.) until
roadway is widened according to the Transportation
Improvement Plan.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of
Commissioners
TIME FRAME: Ongoing
Widening NC168 has occurred as well as
additional traffic signals and deceleration lanes
installed
1. Continue nodal development patterns along the
Highway 158/168 corridor. This strategy should be
reviewed after completion of a corridor study.
Recommendations from that study should be
considered for implementation;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of
Commissioners
TIME FRAME: Ongoing
Nodal development concepts fro commercial uses
has had limited success along 158/168. The
corridor continues to be stripped out for
commercial activity.
4.2: Encourage
development patterns
on highway 158/168
that will enhance
economic development
in the county, will be
aesthetically pleasing,
and will provide for
safe and efficient
movement of traffic.
(E)

2. Prepare a highway corridor study for identifying
measures that will promote economic development
and safe and efficient traffic movement along
Highway 158/168. The report should also contain
recommendations for improving the appearance of
the Highway 158/168 corridor.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County
Planning Department
TIME FRAME: 1991-1992
Highway Corridor Plan was adopted by the
County (1996) and the plan was awarded the
NCADA Small Community Planning Award in
1997.
1. Support construction of a mid-county bridge in
the next five years;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of
Commissioners
TIME FRAME: Ongoing
The Board of Commissioners continues to support
the construction of the Mid-County Bridge,
however, NCDOT has not prioritized this project.
4.3 To provide for
timely evacuation of
residents and guests
on the Currituck
Outer Banks during
major storm events
and improve the
accessibility of
community facilities
and availability of
community services.
(I)

2. Operate satellite County offices as needed on the
Currituck Outer Banks.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: County Manager’s
Office
TIME FRAME: 1991
County opened the Corolla Office to house
Planning, Inspections, Sheriff, and Magistrate’s
Offices (1992)
4.4: To provide a safe
means of access north
of corolla that will
have a negligible
impact on the
environment. (N/A)

1. Prepare an access feasibility study for areas north
of Corolla addressing both short range and long
range needs which addresses the following:
a) identify issues relating to north beach access;
b) review historical developments of access to
northern beaches;
c) analyze growth trends of the northern beaches;
and,
d) identify available alternatives.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County
Planning Department
TIME FRAME: 1992
No formal study was completed, however, access
issues, recreational uses, and improved traffic
management have occurred as amendments to both
the UDO and the County Code of Ordinances.
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
7-6
Goal Strategy Implementation
4.5: To allow the use
of off-road vehicles in
a safe and responsible
manner on the
Currituck Outer
Banks. (N/A)
1. Continue to enforce the existing Outer Banks
Vehicular and Barrier Strand Ordinance.

The ordinance continues to be enforced and in
addition ATV rental operations have been
prohibited as of 12/31/04
1. Appoint an Airport Authority to oversee the
operation of the airport;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of
Commissioners
TIME FRAME: 1991
The Airport Advisory Board was established in
December 1990.
4.6: To encourage
greater utilization of
airport facilities. (E)

2. Carry-out the recommendations established in the
Airport Master Plan.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of
Commissioners and Airport Advisory Board
TIME FRAME: Ongoing
Te Airport Master Plan continues to be
implemented with a 1,500 foot extension to the
runway and the construction of a Terminal
Building. (2003-2004)
1. Keep the minimum lot size for conventional
subdivisions in Currituck County at 30,000 square
feet except in the RO1 zoning district where the
minimum lot size is 40,000 square feet and RO2
zoning district where the minimum lot size is
120,000 square feet (excluding PUD's, PRD's);
Conventional minimum lot sizes have been
increased to 40,000 sq. ft. in the R zoning district
and a minimum of 3 acres in the A district.
2. Encourage cluster development by continuing to
utilize existing Planned Unit Development (PUD),
Planned Residential Development (PRD) and Open
Space Subdivision regulations. Require open space
to include usable land and discourage undesirable
development patterns such as high density PRD's and
PUD's in remote areas without proper infrastructure;
Additional amendments requiring “Conservation
Subdivisions” for developments in excess of 40
lots and open space subdivisions for developments
between 20 lots and 40 lots have recently been
adopted (2003). These standards facilitate cluster
style development.
3. Explore the options available for centralized
sewer systems within developments and make the
information available to the development
community;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County
Planning Department and Health Department
TIME FRAME: 1992
Community wide sewage treatment system for the
Moyock area was studies for the purpose of
serving existing and proposed commercial
development along NC 168. Although still under
study, initial cost estimates and expected revenues
could not support this project.
4. Explore feasibility of a county-wide or
community-wide sewage treatment system;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County
Departments of Planning and Public Works
TIME FRAME: 1995
Community wide sewage treatment system for the
Moyock area was studies for the purpose of
serving existing and proposed commercial
development along NC 168. Although still under
study, initial cost estimates and expected revenues
could not support this project.
5.1: To encourage a
variety of residential
developments offering
a high quality of life
for residents and
having limited
negative impact on the
environment. (E)

5. Remove residential development from the list of
permitted uses in the LM "Light Manufacturing" and
HM "Heavy Manufacturing" zoning district;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County
Planning Department
TIME FRAME:1991
Residential development has been eliminated from
those manufacturing zoning districts as an
amendment to the UDO (1992).
Section 7: Review of Existing Policies
7-7
Goal Strategy Implementation
6. The Unified Development Ordinance should be
amended to promote hierarchical street patterns
based on traffic function and proper setting for
residential neighborhoods;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County
Planning Department
TIME FRAME: 1992
Several UDO amendments have been adopted that
either restrict access onto major arterials (US 158,
NC 168, NC 12, NC 34, and NC 136) or mandate a
reduction in curb cuts by utilizing shared drives or
frontage roads.
7. Where appropriate amend the Unified
Development Ordinance to encourage the use of
proper design principles when developing residential
subdivisions and to minimize the number of curb
cuts along state maintained roads. Consideration
should be given to providing incentives for
excellence in design.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County
Planning Department
TIME FRAME: 1991
See #6 above.
1. Amend the Unified Development Ordinance to
allow greater flexibility in the design of multi-family
housing;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County
Planning
Department
TIME FRAME: 1992
Issue studied in 2000 with no action taken.
2. Continue the present mobile home policy of
allowing double-wides meeting specific appearance
criteria by right in all residential zoning districts;
allowing Class "B" mobile homes (built after July 1,
1976) in existing mobile home parks and on large
lots in limited circumstances and for temporary
replacement of a condemned home; and prohibiting
class "C" mobile homes (built before July 1, 1976);
These provisions are already in the UDO. No
additional actions taken as the County continues to
enforce all provisions of this policy.
5.2: Encourage the
development of
affordable housing. (I)

3. Continue to promote Planned Unit Developments
(PUD's), Planned Residential Developments (PRD's)
and Open Space Subdivisions.
Provisions are already in the UDO. No additional
actions taken.
1. Agricultural Extension Office to hold seminars
around the County advising residents of available
housing rehabilitation as well as new construction
programs;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Agricultural Extension
Office
TIME FRAME: Start in January 1991 and meet
semi-annually
No actions taken to address this policy.
2. Continue infrastructure improvement efforts in
Newtown, Moyock Township;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Albemarle Commission
TIME FRAME: 1991
County successfully implemented a CDBG grant
to provide needed central wastewater facilities for
the Newtown, Moyock area (1995).
5.3: To continue to
revitalize existing
residential
developments in order
to provide safe and
affordable housing for
the residents of
Currituck County. (E)

3. Apply for a grant to rehabilitate homes in
Newtown, Moyock Township;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Albemarle Commission
TIME FRAME: 1992-1993
CDBG “Scattered Site Housing Projects”
administered by the Albemarle Commission have
successful been targeted in this neighborhood.
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
7-8
Goal Strategy Implementation
4. Prepare a study to determine housing needs and
identify areas that qualify for housing grants.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County
Planning Department
TIME FRAME: 1994
No action taken.
1. All residential lots shall have 125 foot of frontage
along streets except in Planned Unit Developments,
Planned Residential Developments, and Open Space
Developments. Further, all commercial lots shall
have a minimum road frontage of 200 feet;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County
Planning Department
TIME FRAME: 1991
UDO has been amended with these road frontage
standards adopted except for commercial lots
(1992).
2. Establish an impact fee system to have new
development help offset the cost of expanding
community facilities attributed to that development;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County
Planning Department
TIME FRAME: 1993
County has be unsuccessful in obtaining special
legislation to impose impact fees, however efforts
still continue.
6.1: To ensure that
rapid development
occurring in
Currituck County will
not detract from the
quality of life nor
cause a loss in quality
of providing
community services.
(E)

3. Assess development trends in the community to
determine if federal, state and the Unified
Development Ordinance regulations are promoting
development consistent with County long range
goals.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County
Planning Department
TIME FRAME: 1992
No known assessment taken to address this policy.
1. Continue to work with the Division of Land
Resources and Division of Environmental
Management in reviewing and implementing erosion
control plans and storm water control plans,
respectively;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County
Planning Department and Soil Conservation Service
TIME FRAME: Ongoing
County Technical Review Committee established
in 2003 to oversee compliance with all local, state,
and federal regulations. DWQ and Land Quality
permits are now required at this review stage.
6.2: To ensure
development activities
occur in compliance
with state and federal
regulations and to
pursue state and
federal funding
programs that will
enhance the
accessibility of water
resources. (E)

2. Continue to apply for CAMA, Wildlife Resources,
and related grants for ocean and sound accesses, boat
ramps, piers, navigational dredging and the like.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County
Planning Department
TIME FRAME: Ongoing
a. CAMA beach access grant for Pine Island
awared to Currituck County (September 1996).
b. Parks and Recreation Trust Fund Grant for
Harbinger Sound Access and Recreation awarded
2002.
c. CAMA Beach Access Grant for Corolla Village
awarded to Currituck County March 2005.
1. Make sure all developments indicate well
locations on their lots and adjoining lots to ensure
100 foot separation from septic systems;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County
Planning Department
Policy continues to be enforced by County
Planning Department and ARHS (Health
Department).
2. Explore the feasibility of a County-wide or
community-wide sewage treatment system;
(STATED IN 5.1)
See Goal 5.1, Strategies #3, #4.
6.3: To encourage
development that will
not negatively impact
potable water supplies
in terms of water
quality and quantity.
(E)

3. Determine the volume of potable water supplies
on the Outer Banks by establishing and monitoring
test wells. (Stated in 8.5)

Reverse Osmosis (RO) Water Plant was identified
as a county solution to potable water. Plant
Construction completed 2005.
Section 7: Review of Existing Policies
7-9
Goal Strategy Implementation
6.4: To prohibit the
establishment of
floating home
development. (E)

1. Maintain provisions in the Unified Development
Ordinance that prohibit the use of floating home
development.
Provisions are already in the UDO. Floating
homes continue to be prohibited by the UDO.
1. Amend the Unified Development Ordinance to
permit marinas subject to established design
principles such as the following:
a) Marinas shall be planned in such a manner as to
minimize the risk of water pollution.
b) Marinas shall be located in areas where there is a
high rate of water "turnover" (the time required for
tidal action or water flow to replace water of a boat
basin with new water from another source). Ideally,
marinas should have a water turnover rate of 2 to 4
days.
c) Marinas in upland areas shall be encouraged.
d) Marina access channels shall be designed to
maximize circulation and avoid dead-end spots.
e) Marina designs must incorporate facilities for the
proper handling of sewage, waste, and refuse.
f) Marinas shall minimize alteration of existing
shoreline configurations and disturbance of vital
habitat areas.
g) Dredging operations shall not occur during critical
periods of fish migration and breeding.
h) The method of dredging shall be chosen that will
have the least environmental impact and, all dredged
materials shall be placed in a manner so as not to
pollute surrounding areas.
i) Proposals for marina development shall be
accompanied by a modeling study indicating
expected flushing.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County
Planning Department
TIME FRAME: 1991
No large scale marinas have been constructed in
the County since the adoption of this Plan.
6.5: To permit
marina development
(including marinas
associated with
residential
subdivisions) only
when it can clearly be
shown that the marina
has no significant
impact on the public
trust waters, estuarine
areas and
surrounding
properties. (N/A)

2. Permit marinas as an accessory use to residential
development. Marinas not associated with
residential developments and dry stack storage
facilities shall only be permitted in accordance with
the Unified Development Ordinance.
Provisions are already in the UDO. No action
necessary as the Ordinance remains unchanged.
1. Allow island development that complies with the
County's zoning regulations;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of
Commissioners
TIME FRAME: Ongoing
No island development has occurred since the
adoption of this Plan.
6.6: To allow the
development of
islands that would
best promote the
public interests. (N/A)
2. Permit the development of Monkey Island for the
purpose of public education or research and related
purposes.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of
Commissioners and Board of Education
TIME FRAME: Ongoing
Monkey Island is under sever erosion and County,
State, and Federal efforts are now underway to
determine how best to save this unique resource
(2005).
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
7-10
Goal Strategy Implementation
6.7: To permit the use
of bulkheads for
stabilizing non-ocean
shorelines. (E)

1. Require all bulkhead installations be done
according to CAMA regulations.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County
Planning Department and Division of Coastal
Management
TIME FRAME: Ongoing
Policy is being implemented by County Planning
and Inspections with oversight by DCM.
1. Oppose all drilling off the coast of North Carolina
and oppose the location of any associated support or
processing facilities within Currituck County;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of
Commissioners
TIME FRAME: Ongoing
County continues to support this policy. 6.8 To protect the
fragile coastal
environment from
negative impacts of
energy facilities. (E)

2. Allow energy generating plants in accordance with
the provisions of the Unified Development
Ordinance as long as it is consistent with
environmental protection, health, and welfare of the
community.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of
Commissioners
TIME FRAME: Ongoing
Same as above.
1. Request the state to reevaluate the stream
classification of the Currituck Sound and associated
tributaries to see if they warrant upgrading, thereby
affording a higher level of protection by the state.
(Note: the Currituck Sound and associated
tributaries were last evaluated by the state in 1961 at
which time they were classified as "SC" waters.
This designation affords the least amount of
protection with respect to allowable discharges);
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of
Commissioners
The Board of Commissioners passed a resolution
requesting the State to reevaluate the classification
of the Currituck County and associated tributaries
on July 2, 1990. Further actions on this policy are
unknown; however, a grant request has been
submitted to the Clean Water Management Trust
Fund to reevaluate these water classifications.
2. Review results from the Albemarle Pamlico
Estuary Study (APES) and implement suggested
environmental management strategies for improving
and maintaining the quality of the Currituck Sound
and associated tributaries where appropriate;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Planning Board and
Board of Commissioners
TIME FRAME:1992
No known actions taken to implement
environmental strategies in this study.
3. Develop communication channels with
southeastern Virginia communities in order to inform
them of the status, concerns and programs being
undertaken relating to the water quality of the
Currituck Sound;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County
Planning Department
TIME FRAME: 1991

7.1: To maintain and
improve the water
quality in the
Currituck and
Albemarle Sounds. (E)

4. Continue to oppose discharges from water and
wastewater treatment facilities;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of
Commissioners
County supports no discharges of waste water,
however, discharges of reverse osmosis brine
where a “finding of no significant impact” can be
determined continues to be supported by the
County.
Section 7: Review of Existing Policies
7-11
Goal Strategy Implementation
5. Discuss with the state the feasibility of allowing
wastewater from water treatment plants to be
injected into the ground as opposed to being
discharged into surface water bodies.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of
Commissioners and County Manager
TIME FRAME: 1993
State environmental laws continue to prohibit this
activity.
7.2: To maintain the
high quality of
estuarine waters and
to promote
appropriate
development along
estuarine shorelines so
as not to degrade the
estuarine system. (E)

UDO amendments support this goal in two (2)
ways:
a. Zoning adjacent to estuarine waters is consistent
with DWQ low intensity options.
b. Post development stormwater run off shall not
exceed pre-development standards.
7.3 Keep all public
trust waters open for
navigation including
those areas under the
jurisdiction of the
federal government.
(E)
The County continues to support this policy and its
attempts to maintain the historic access to the
Whalehead Club in Corolla; however efforts have
been frustrated by CAMA and USACE
regulations. The County will continue to attempt
to demonstrate that the channel historically existed
and project is in fact maintenance dredging.
7.4: To protect
coastal wetlands so
that they can continue
to serve their vital
function in the
environment. (E)

Coastal Wetlands have been protected by
employing “Conservation” style subdivisions
which excludes these sensitive areas from density
calculations (2003).
7.5: To allow limited
development in the
ocean hazard area
that is sensitive to the
fragile environment.
(I)

Development in Ocean Hazard AECs continues to
follow Division of Coastal Management’s
requirements.
1. Continue to review development proposals for
location of 404 and CAMA wetlands.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County
Planning Department
TIME FRAME: Ongoing
Both 404 and CAMA Wetlands are required to be
identifies on all development plans and excluded
from density calculations (1999 and 2003).
7.6: Protect swamps
from encroaching
development in order
to preserve vegetation
and their function as
an important habitat
for wildlife. (E)
7.7: To protect
maritime and
petrified forests from
encroaching
development. (N/A)
1. Delineate boundaries of maritime forests and
establish local regulations for their protection instead
of guidelines;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County
Planning Department and NC Department of the
Environment
TIME FRAME: 1992
No County regulations for the mandatory
preservation of either Maritime or Petrified Forests
have occurred during the planning period.
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
7-12
Goal Strategy Implementation
2. Identify the location of petrified forests and
establish local regulations for their protection.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County
Planning Department
TIME FRAME: 1993

1. Support a beach nourishment program only for
enhancement of beach traffic in the event a north
beach access road is not provided and erosion is
sufficient to limit access along the beaches.

Although no beach nourishment program has been
advanced to address continuous access to beaches
north of Corolla, the County has adopted a local
Nuisance Ordinance that prohibits erosion
threatened structures situated in public trust areas
to remain in place.
1. Prohibit development requiring sewage treatment
on soils that are unsuitable for on site septic systems
unless sewerage can be pumped to soils that are
suitable;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County
Health Department
TIME FRAME: Ongoing
Local Health Department has been responsible for
enforcing this policy. In addition, the County has
adopted an ordinance prohibiting the “off-site”
pumping of sewage, except to a wastewater
treatment plant.
2. Continue participating in the National Flood
Insurance Program;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County
Planning Department
TIME FRAME: Ongoing
Currituck County is a participant in both NFIP and
the Community Rating System.
3. Encourage package treatment plants for Planned
Unit Developments (PUD's), Planned Residential
Developments (PRD's) and Open Space
Subdivisions. Use of alternative sewerage disposal
systems that are environmentally safe should be
encouraged (i.e., constructed wetlands);
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Planning Board and
Board of Commissioners
TIME FRAME: Ongoing
Centralized wastewater treatments plants are
required for all PUDs and PRDs only (1992-1993).
4. Explore the potential of having a wildlife
inventory prepared for Currituck County;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County
Planning Department
TIME FRAME: 1993
No action taken by the County on this strategy.
5. Develop procedures for County review of drainage
and storm water control plans and establish a system
to verify plans have been implemented in the field;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County
Planning Department, County Engineer, and Soil
Conservation Service
TIME FRAME: 1991
Technical review Committee established to review
developments drainage plans on a monthly basis
(2003). Verification of plan implementation
relegated to County Engineer, Soil Conservation,
and Zoning Administration. (See 6.2, #1)
7.8: To ensure that
there is continuous
access to and from the
beaches north of
corolla where no
improved road exist.
(I)
7.9: To insure
development is
sensitive to the
physical constraints of
the land. (E)

6. Continue ordinance provisions requiring the
planting of vegetation in developments and to
encourage the preservation of existing vegetation,
particularly along water bodies.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County
Planning Department
TIME FRAME: 1991
Ordinance provisions in place (1992).
Section 7: Review of Existing Policies
7-13
Goal Strategy Implementation
1. Establish a Recreation Committee to assess the
recreational needs of Currituck County and to make
recommendations for developing a county-wide
comprehensive recreational program;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of
Commissioners
TIME FRAME: 1991
County-wide Recreation Department established
by Board of Commissioners (2000).
2. Establish a Parks and Recreation Department to
implement recommendations of the Recreation
Committee;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of
Commissioners
TIME FRAME: 1992
County-wide Recreation Department established
by Board of Commissioners (2000).
3. Encourage funding of recreational programs
through private funds, grants and public funds (i.e.,
impact fees);
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Parks and recreation
Department
TIME FRAME: Ongoing
Public funds and State grants form North Carolina
Parks and Recreation Trust Fund support
recreation facilities and programs.
8.1: To provide
enough recreational
facilities to meet the
needs of all citizens
and to take advantage
of the natural
amenities of
Currituck County. (E)

4. Continue to require dedication of land in large
developments (20 lots or more) for public purposes
and allow the payment of fees instead of dedication
where appropriate.
Through incentives (Density Bonuses), dedication
of land for public facilities has been provided for
in the UDO. “Useable” open space for recreation
purposes is required for all residential subdivisions
over 20 lots.
1. Inventory all potential ocean and sound access
points and establish a priority rating for funding as
part of a comprehensive recreation program;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Recreation Committee
TIME FRAME: 1992
No action taken.
2. Apply for CAMA, WRC (Wildlife Resources
Commission) and applicable land and water
conservation funds to establish more ocean and
sound accesses in the County on the Outer Banks and
the mainland;
SEE COMMITMENT TO FEDERAL/STATE
PROGRAMS
See goal 6.2, #2.
3. Establish three public restroom facilities on the
Outer Banks, one near the Dare County line, one in
Corolla and one in Carova Beach;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County
Planning Department
TIME FRAME: 1995
Public restroom facilities have been established at
the Pine Island Beach Access site (1996) and
DCM grant to construct bath facilities in Corolla
Village approved March 2005.
8.2: To increase the
number of public
beach and sound
accesses and
associated facilities.
(E)

4. Establish additional County recreational and
boating facilities in Currituck.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County
Planning Department
TIME FRAME: Ongoing
The County continues to work with WRC in
establishing additional boat launching facilities for
public use. Also see Goal 6.2, #2.
8.3: To provide the
residents of Currituck
the highest level of
county services and to
ensure that adequate
1. The County shall identify sites for the jail facility,
social services building and senior citizens center;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of
Commissioners
TIME FRAME: 1991
All three (3) new County facilities have been
completed with the most recent being the County
Jail (2004).
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
7-14
Goal Strategy Implementation
2. The County shall proceed with finalizing plans
and establishing a location for an administrative
building;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of
Commissioners
TIME FRAME: 1991
New Administrative buildings completed (2000).
3. The County shall prepare a capital improvements
plan to guide the expansion of all county facilities;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of
Commissioners
TIME FRAME: 1992
Ten-year capital improvement plans now a part of
annual County budgeting process.
facilities are available
to meet current and
long range needs of
the County. (E)
4. A long range facilities plan shall be prepared for
Currituck County schools.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of
Commissioners
TIME FRAME: 1993
Board of Commissioners and Board of Education
agreed to approve a 10-year Capital Facilities plan
for new school construction and expansion.
1. Establish a solid waste task force committee to
formulate a long range plan addressing the disposal
of solid waste in Currituck County;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of
Commissioners to make appointments
TIME FRAME: 1992
Plan established by Public Works identifying new
locations for disposal and recycling centers all of
which have been implemented.
2. Support a regional waste facility;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: County Manager’s
Office
TIME FRAME: Immediately
Regional waste facility established for Northeast
North Carolina.
8.4: To ensure that
solid waste materials
are disposed of
properly and to
encourage recycling.
(E)

3. Comply with provisions of Senate Bill 111 by
emphasizing recycling and properly disposing of
materials considered to be hazardous.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of
Commissioners
TIME FRAME: Ongoing
Community recycling established with disposal
centers in all townships of the County including
Carova (Fruitville Township).
1. Implement the recommendations contained in the
Mainland Water Facilities Phase II/III Study
prepared by Black and Veatch in 1989;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of
Commissioners
TIME FRAME: Complete Installation by 2010
Many of the recommendations have been
implemented creating a trunk line of water service
from the Virginia line to Point Harbor. With the
recent completion of the County RO Plant and on-
going installation of distribution lines in Corolla,
comprehensive County water service is now being
provided.
8.5: To provide
centralized water
throughout the
county. (E)
2. Prepare a study on the potential for having water
and sewer services under central control for the
entire Outer Banks;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Public Works
Department
TIME FRAME: 1995
Studies for both water (1997) and sewer (2004) for
the Corolla Outer Banks have been completed with
an emphasis on plant capacities and potential
limitations.
Section 7: Review of Existing Policies
7-15
Goal Strategy Implementation
3. Prepare a plan to provide centralized water to
Gibbs Woods, Knotts Island and the Currituck Outer
Banks;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of
Commissioners to authorize study
TIME FRAME: 1995
Central water services now available for the
Corolla Outer Banks. No request or demand for
this service for Knotts Island or Gibbs Woods.
4. Monitor the availability of water on the Outer
Banks using test wells.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Public Works
Department
TIME FRAME: 1993
No action taken, except for monitoring water
availability associated with the Outer Banks RO
Plant and private water utility companies to ensure
future availability.
1. Board of Commissioners to keep in touch annually
with North Carolina Power and Virginia Power to
assess the best way to service the area and upgrade
facilities;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of
Commissioners
TIME FRAME: 1991-1995
Annual presentations made to the Board of
Commissioners concerning electrical expansions
and facility upgrades.
8.6: to ensure the
Currituck Outer
Banks is provided
with suitable electrical
service. (E)

2. Continue to support underwater power lines.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of
Commissioners
TIME FRAME: Ongoing
Underground power required for all new
residential and commercial subdivisions (UDO
1993).
1. County to assist individuals who want to have
their structures listed on the National Register;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County
Planning Department
TIME FRAME: Ongoing
The County has taken the initiative to fully fund
the rehabilitation and restoration of the Whalehead
Club in Corolla (1992) and the “Colored School”
in Jarvisburg (2004) as these are significant
historical and cultural resources. In addition, the
Historic Currituck County Courthouse building
continues to be restored in compliance with the
National Register Guidelines.
2. North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural resources to review development
plans that require CAMA permits;
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: NC Department of the
Environment
TIME FRAME: Ongoing

8.7: To encourage the
preservation of
significant historical
and cultural sites. (E)

3. Support the Century Farm Family recognition
program administered by the Department of
Agriculture.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Agricultural Extension
Office
TIME FRAME: Ongoing

9.1: To ensure the
county can effectively
handle a major storm
event in terms of
immediate needs and
long range
reconstruction. (E)

1. Emergency Services to educate all agencies
involved during major storm events of their proper
roles; A plan shall be prepared that outlines the
County's policies on reconstruction after a major
storm event.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Emergency Services
TIME FRAME: Ongoing
Currituck County adopted its first Hazard
Mitigation Plan which was subsequently approved
by both North Carolina and FEMA (2004). This
plan describes reconstruction policies after a
natural hazard as well as the hazards to which the
County is most vulnerable.

Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
7-16

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
Section 8: Land Use and Development Goals
8-1
SECTION 8: LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT GOALS
Introduction to the Goals
For any long rang plan to be effective, it is important that the plan have several overriding
goals. Such goals provide a compass, overall purpose and central thrust to the plan. At the
same time, they can serve as criteria with which to evaluate the plan’s policies and
recommendations. The following goals flow from the issues and ideas identified by the public
at numerous meetings held during the plan’s preparation and as further identified by the
Currituck County Commissioners, the Currituck County Planning Board, and the Land Use
Plan Steering Committee.
Ten Land Use and Development Goals
1. To protect and conserve the area’s natural beauty and coastal resources as the County’s greatest
asset for economic development and a high quality of life.

2. To provide suitable public access opportunities to the County’s public trust waters and
shorelines so as to allow for a wide range of activities.

3. To conserve the County’s remaining prime agricultural areas, while recognizing the economic
realities of farm operations and private property rights.

4. To avoid taking or approving actions related to infrastructure and the provision of services that
could induce intensive development in environmentally fragile areas; examples include the
north beaches of the Outer Banks and Knotts Island.

5. To diversify the County’s economic base, to include environmentally compatible businesses
and industries that reach beyond the tourist-based economy.

6. To preserve critical natural areas as the source of biological diversity and productivity of the
County’s ocean and estuarine environments.

7. To exercise caution, foresight, and common sense in dealing with the risks of coastal
development.

8. To preserve the traffic carrying capacity of existing roadways and provision of new roadways
and roadway improvements in accordance with carefully developed plans.

9. To preserve and improve water quality in the coastal waters of Currituck County.

10. To properly distribute development forms in accordance with the suitability of the land,
infrastructure available and the compatibility of surrounding land uses.

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
Section 9: Land Use and Development Policies
9-1
SECTION 9: LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT POLICIES
Introduction to the Policies
The following pages contain the official policies of the Currituck County Land Use Plan. These
policies are presented in response to growth and development issues identified by the public at
numerous meetings held during the plan’s preparation and as further identified by the Currituck
County Commissioners, the Currituck County Planning Board, and the Land Use Plan Steering
Committee. They are also intended to fulfill the requirements of North Carolina’s CAMA Land
Use Planning Program.

The policy statements are presented in bold type and numbered for easy reference. When adopted,
they are to be viewed as official policy positions of Currituck County government. As such, the
policies should remain substantially unchanged over time. Frequent changes to the policies would
undermine their effectiveness in achieving intended planning and management objectives. Indeed,
the policies are designed to maintain a consistent and predictable direction for County
government decisions over a period of several years. The policies provide a basis for future
decisions regarding growth and development, capital improvements, provision of County
services, environmental protection, intergovernmental planning and cooperation, and other related
matters.
How to tell a policy from an implementation action or a standard.
In reviewing the policies of this plan, questions may arise as why policy statements are written
the way they are. Some reviewers may say they are written too broadly, while others may say
they are too specific. Sometimes there is confusion as to what a policy statement is and what an
implementation action is. Occasionally, it may be tempting to try to include ordinance-like
standards in policy statements—where they do not belong. Below are some useful rules of thumb
for evaluating whether a policy statement is written at the appropriate level of specificity. These
rules are intended to reveal whether a particular statement is truly a policy, or has crossed the line
into becoming an implementation action or a standard. (All of the policies and implementation
actions contained in this plan are intended to perform their proper roles.)
Rules of thumb
• If you can use a statement over and over again to guide decisions, and it doesn’t diminish
or go away, it is probably a policy.
• If you can use a statement only once and it goes away, (like an item on a “to-do list”) it is
probably an implementation action.
• If something in a statement sounds like a specific requirement or standard, it probably is.
Such standards should be codified into an ordinance rather than placed in a policy
statement or document.
Simple Examples:
What follows are three statements addressing the same issue that exemplify the differences
between a Policy, an Implementation Action, and a Standard.

POLICY: Currituck County shall discourage high-density development in environmentally
sensitive areas.

IMPLEMENTATION ACTION: The County Planning Department will prepare a new zoning
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
9-2
district for environmentally sensitive areas of Currituck County to be considered for adoption by
the Board of County Commissioners during FY 2005-2006.

STANDARD: The minimum lot size in the Environmental District is 3 acres.
Key words, often used in the policy statements, have special meaning.
Certain key words are used frequently in policy statements. The following glossary is intended to
convey the specific meaning of these key words as used in the Land Use Plan Policy Statements.

adequate: sufficient to achieve the intended purpose or prevent harm allow/permit:
authorize; official action to let something happen
control: to regulate or direct
discourage: to not favor; to dissuade
encourage: to favor or foster (also see support)
endorse: to approve of an action, often by another party
may: provides the option, but not required
preferred: among alternatives, the favored course
pro hi bit: not allowed, period
promote: to proactively encourage, to take positive steps
reasonable practical, even-handed, sensible, not extreme
require: to mandate something
shall: mandatory, not optional
should: ought to, if no valid reason not to
significant: important, as determined by quantity or relative impact
support: to shore up; may imply financial support
Organization of the Policies
CAMA Land Use Planning Guidelines require that certain required policy categories be
organized under five management topics: (a) Public Access, (b) Land Use Compatibility, (c)
Infrastructure Carrying Capacity, (d) Natural Hazard Areas, and (e) Water Quality. A sixth
topic area, called Local Concerns allows the local government to address other growth and
development issues that may not be covered under the first five topics. In the case of the
Currituck County Land Use Plan, a seventh policy category, Subarea Concerns, has also been
added to allow for policies specific to the three subareas of the county. The full listing of all
seven topics and their subcategories is shown below.
PUBLIC ACCESS
Public Access Policies
LAND USE COMPATIBILITY POLICIES
Policies to Conserve Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ES)
Agricultural and Rural Area Preservation Policies (AG)
Housing and Neighborhood Development Policies (HN)
Commercial Development Policies (CD)
Industrial Development Policies (ID)
INFRASTRUCTURE CARRYING CAPACITY
Transportation Policies (TR)
Water and Sewer Service Policies (WS)
Section 9: Land Use and Development Policies
9-3
Policies for School Facilities (SF)
Solid Waste Management Policies (SW)
Parks and Recreation Policies (PR)
Policies on Paying For Infrastructure and Services
NATURAL HAZARD AREAS
Natural Hazard Area Policies (NH)
WATER QUALITY
Water Quality Policies (WQ)
LOCAL COUNTYWIDE CONCERNS
Economic Development Policies (ED)
Community Appearance Policies (CA)
Historic Preservation Policies (HP)
Policies on Public Safety Services (PS)
SUBAREA CONCERNS1
Special Policies Applicable to the Mainland Area (ML)
Special Policies Applicable to the Outer Banks (OB)
Special Policies Applicable to Knotts Island (KI)

The policies of the Currituck County Land Use Plan begin on the following page. Please note that
each of the five required policy areas is preceded by the Management Goal and Planning
Objective set forth in the CAMA Land Use Planning Guidelines for that policy area.
Public Access
CAMA Management Goal
Maximize public access to the beaches and the public trust waters of the coastal region.

CAMA Planning Objective
Develop comprehensive policies that provide beach and public trust water access opportunities
for the public along the shoreline within the planning jurisdiction.
PUBLIC ACCESS POLICIES (PA)
POLICY PA1: Public access to the sound and ocean waters of Currituck County is essential to the
quality of life of residents and visitors, as well as the economy of the area. The County supports
the establishment of ADDITIONAL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ACCESS opportunities to the
waters of Currituck County. (Also see Outer Banks Policy Section.)

POLICY PA2: The County supports MANY FORMS OF “ACCESS” to the water, including
scenic outlooks and boardwalks, boat ramps, marinas and docks, fishing piers, canoe and kayak
launches, and other means of access. Whenever possible, such facilities shall be designed to

1 The Special Subarea Policies allow for the development of policy positions that are custom tailored to
concerns and perspectives in each of the three subareas of the County. In instances where a countywide
policy and a sub-area policy address the same subject matter, the sub-area policy shall take precedence
over the countywide policy.

Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
9-4
accommodate the needs of handicapped individuals.

POLICY PA3: Properties owned by the County, State or other cooperating public agencies shall
be considered as special opportunities for public access sites. MULTIPLE USE OF
APPROPRIATE SITES (e.g. utility station and public boat ramp site) shall be encouraged.

POLICY PA4: The LOCATION OF PUBLIC ACCESS SITES shall generally be determined by
a rational examination of the sound and ocean resource, the distribution of existing access sites,
and the availability of appropriate new sites. In addition to advanced planning, however, the
County will remain open to any site that offers good shoreline access for the public, as unforeseen
opportunities may arise.

POLICY PA5: PUBLIC AND PRIVATE MARINAS offering access to area waters should be
encouraged when developed in accordance with the CAMA specific use standards for marinas
(i.e. docks for more than 10 vessels). Marinas shall not be approved, however, that are
incompatible with nearby land uses or whose designs fail to meet the environmental quality and
development standards of the County’s Unified Development Ordinance.

POLICY PA6: MARINAS IN UPLAND LOCATIONS generally shall be preferred over marinas
in open water, thereby better preserving the visual appearance of the shoreline as well as avoiding
the “consumption” of available public trust surface waters.

POLICY PA7: Currituck County marina owners shall be encouraged to participate in BEST
PRACTICE OPERATING PROGRAMS, such as the “Clean Marina” program sponsored by the
NC Division of Coastal Management and the NC Marine Trades Services organization. The
County encourages marina operators to apply for grants that may be available to help pay for
pump-out facilities or other environmental improvements.

POLICY PA8: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR BOAT RAMPS AND/OR PARKING
AREAS associated with public access sites shall address, at a minimum, requirements for
stormwater runoff, water quality protections, aesthetic concerns and adequate water depth at low
tide.

POLICY PA9: Currituck County shall discourage developments which would have the effect of
“WALLING OFF THE WATER”, thereby eliminating views to the water from adjoining streets,
roads, walkways and other public spaces.

POLICY PA10: Opportunities for protecting or creating public access shall be pursued when
drafting and administering development standards for ocean front and sound front projects in the
County.
Section 9: Land Use and Development Policies
9-5
LAND USE COMPATIBILITY
CAMA Management Goal
Ensure that development and use of resources or preservation of land minimizes direct and
secondary environmental impacts; avoids risks to public health, safety and welfare; and is
consistent with the capability of the land based on considerations of interactions of natural and
manmade features.

CAMA Planning Objective
• Adopt and apply local development policies that balance protection of natural resources
and fragile areas with economic development.
• Policies shall provide clear direction to assist local decision-making and consistency for
zoning, division of land, and public and private projects.
POLICIES TO CONSERVE ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS (ES)
POLICY ES1: New development shall be permitted to locate only in areas with SUITABLE
SOIL and where ADEQUATE INFRASTRUCTURE is available. For existing development
located on poor soils, and where sewage treatment upgrades are necessary, engineering solutions
may be supported, provided that environmental concerns are fully addressed.

POLICY ES2: NON-COASTAL WETLANDS, including FRESHWATER SWAMPS, AND
INLAND, NON-TIDAL WETLANDS, shall be conserved for the important role they play in
absorbing floodwaters, filtering pollutants from stormwater runoff, recharging the ground water
table, and providing critical habitat for many plant and animal species. Currituck County supports
the efforts of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in protecting such wetlands through the Section
4042 permit program of the Clean Water Act, as well as Section 4013 water quality certifications
by the State of North Carolina.

POLICY ES3: COASTAL WETLANDS shall be conserved for the valuable functions they
perform in protecting water quality and in providing critical habitat for the propagation and
survival of important plant and animal species. CAMA use standards and policies for coastal
wetlands shall be supported. Uses approved for location in a coastal wetland must be water
dependent (i.e. utility easements, bridges, docks and piers) and be developed so as to minimize
adverse impacts.

POLICY ES4: In approving new developments, Currituck County shall support the retention or

2 Section 404 of the federal Clean Water Act establishes a program to regulate the discharge of dredged
and fill material into waters of the United States, including wetlands. Activities in waters of the United
States that are regulated under this program include fills for development, water resource projects (such as
dams and levees), infrastructure development (such as highways and airports), and conversion of wetlands
to uplands for farming and forestry. The US Environmental Protection Agency and the US Army Corps of
Engineers jointly administer the program. See http://www.epa.gov/owow/wetlands/facts/fact10.html for a
full description of the 404 permit program.

3 Section 401 of the federal Clean Water Act delegates authority to the states to issue a 401 Water Quality
Certification for all projects that require a Federal Permit (such as a Section 404 Permit). The "401" is
essentially verification by the state that a given project will not degrade Waters of the State or otherwise
violate water quality standards. See http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/basic401.html for a full
description of the 401 program in North Carolina

Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
9-6
creation of a vegetated buffer area along ESTUARINE SHORELINES as a simple, effective and
low-cost means of preventing pollutants from entering estuarine waters. Exceptions to this
requirement may include developments involving pre-existing man-made features such as
hardened shorelines, ditches, and canals. Farming and forestry operations that abide by
appropriate “best management practices” are also exempt. The County also supports CAMA use
standards for all COASTAL SHORELINES, whether estuarine or otherwise.

POLICY ES5: Uses allowed in ESTUARINE WATERS must be water dependent (public access,
docks, piers, erosion control, and other CAMA-approved uses) and must not interfere with the
proper function, cleanliness, salinity, and circulation of the resource. FLOATING HOMES shall
not be approved for placement in the estuarine waters of Currituck County. (Also see the Public
Access section of this plan for policies concerning new MARINAS.)

POLICY ES6: The location and design of piers and docks shall not unduly interfere with the
rights of the public to the free and unobstructed use of PUBLIC TRUST WATERS for
navigation, fishing, and other uses. Efforts to limit the length of piers into public trust waters shall
be supported.

POLICY ES7: MARITIME FORESTS and SAND DUNES shall receive a high level of
environmental protection and special consideration when reviewing public and private sector
development proposals in Currituck County.

POLICY ES8: Areas of the County identified for significant future growth shall avoid
NATURAL HERITAGE AREAS (e.g. Great Marsh on Knotts Island, Currituck Banks/Swan
Island Natural Area, Currituck Banks Corolla Natural Area, Pine Island/Currituck Club Natural
Area, Northwest River Marsh Game Land, and many other marsh areas on the mainland.)
AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL AREA PRESERVATION POLICIES
POLICY AG1: ACTIVE AGRICULTURAL LANDS having a high productive potential, and
especially those removed from infrastructure and services, should be conserved for continued
agricultural use.

POLICY AG2: Farms and woodlands shall be recognized as an integral part of the county’s
OPEN SPACE SYSTEM. Efforts to keep these areas viable as part of the area’s resource-based
economic sector, shall be encouraged.

POLICY AG3: County ACTIONS CONCERNING INFRASTRUCTURE (e.g. schools, parks,
and utilities) and regulations shall serve to direct new development first to targeted growth areas
near existing settlements identified as Full Service Areas on the Future Land Use Map, rather
than “leapfrogging” to locations in the midst of farmland and greenspace identified as Rural and
Conservation areas on the Future Land Use Map.

POLICY AG4: County growth management tools, including particularly zoning, should provide
PROTECTION TO AGRICULTURE and other RESOURCE BASED ACTIVITIES from
incompatible land uses, such as a residential subdivision in the midst of generally uninterrupted
farm land.

POLICY AG5: The County encourages beneficial programs (farmland preservation trust fund,
conservation easements, purchase or transfer of development rights, farmland preservation
districts, etc.) that encourage VOLUNTARY PROPERTY OWNER STEWARDSHIP of valuable
Section 9: Land Use and Development Policies
9-7
farm and open space areas for future generations.

POLICY AG6: For areas experiencing intense development pressure, new residential
development may be allowed to locate in COMPACT, VILLAGE-LIKE CLUSTERS,
PREFERABLY NEAR EXISTING, NON-AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITIES AND SERVICES,
or in other locations that will not interfere with resource production activities. Overall density
shall remain very low, with permanent open space, dedicated during the development review
process, surrounding such clusters of homes.
HOUSING AND NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT POLICIES
POLICY HN1: Currituck County shall encourage development to occur at densities appropriate
for the location. LOCATION AND DENSITY FACTORS shall include whether the development
is within an environmentally suitable area, the type and capacity of sewage treatment available to
the site, the adequacy of transportation facilities providing access to the site, and the proximity of
the site to existing and planned urban services. For example, projects falling within the Full
Services areas of the Future Land Use Map would be permitted a higher density because of the
availability of infrastructure as well as similarity to the existing development pattern. Such
projects could be developed at a density of two (2) or more dwelling units per acre. Projects
within areas designated as Limited Service would be permitted a density of one (1) to one and
one half (1.5) units per acre depending upon the surrounding development pattern and availability
of resources. Projects within areas designated as Rural or Conservation by the Future Land Use
Plan would be permitted a much lower density of 1 dwelling unit per 3 acres because of the lack
of infrastructure in the area, the existing low density development pattern, and presence of
environmentally sensitive natural areas.

POLICY HN2: Currituck County recognizes that large-lot mini-estates (i.e. 5 to 10 acres)
consume large amounts of land, often without economic purpose. Estate lots having no
relationship to agriculture or other resource-based activities promote sprawl and make the
provision of infrastructure and services very costly. The County shall therefore encourage
alternatives to large lot developments through INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS
AND CORRESPONDING ZONING techniques.

POLICY HN3: Currituck County shall especially encourage two forms of residential
development, each with the objective of avoiding traditional suburban sprawl:

1. OPEN SPACE DEVELOPMENTS that cluster homes on less land, preserving permanently
dedicated open space and often employ on-site or community sewage treatment. These types
of developments are likely to occur primarily in the Conservation, Rural, and to a certain
extent the Limited Service areas identified on the Future Land Use Map.
2. COMPACT, MIXED USE DEVELOPMENTS or DEVELOPMENTS NEAR A MIXTURE
OF USES that promote a return to balanced, self-supporting community centers generally
served by centralized water and sewer. The types of development are contemplated for the
Full Service Areas identified on the Future Land Use Map.

POLICY HN4: Currituck County shall discourage all forms of housing from
“LEAPFROGGING” INTO THE MIDST OF FARMLAND and rural areas, thereby eroding the
agricultural resource base of the county.

POLICY HN5: Currituck County recognizes that there are many types of housing, in addition to
manufactured housing (i.e. mobile homes), that are often overlooked in meeting the
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
9-8
AFFORDABLE HOUSING NEEDS of young families, workers of modest income, senior
citizens and others. To encourage affordable housing other than just manufactured housing,
Currituck County may reserve appropriate areas of the county for stick-built housing forms only,
and other areas of the county for accessory units in association with a principal structure.

POLICY HN6: Currituck County recognizes the diversity of HOUSING NEEDS FOR SENIOR
CITIZENS including, but not limited to, active adult retirement communities, assisted living
facilities, nursing homes, granny flats, and accessory apartments within the principal structure of
a home. The County shall encourage a range of housing forms and costs to meet a broad income
spectrum.

POLICY HN7: The County shall encourage development patterns and housing choices that allow
for more COST-EFFECTIVE TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS for those citizens who cannot or
choose not to drive, including senior citizens, lower wage workers, handicapped persons, and the
young. Such a policy will also work to reduce traffic congestion on the county’s already
overburdened primary road system.

POLICY HN8: To protect the County’s tax base and to ensure the long-term viability of the
County’s neighborhoods and housing stock, the County will continue to enforce appropriate
CONSTRUCTION AND SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS for residential developments.
Such standards may include, for example, that all homes have a permanent masonry foundation
(except where flood levels require elevation) and a pitched roof and overhang, and that local
roads must be built to meet NCDOT acceptance standards. (See Transportation Policies for
details concerning requirements for paved roads.)

POLICY HN9: Proposed residential development that would expose residents to the harmful
effects of INCOMPATIBLE LAND USES or to ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS shall be
prohibited. This would include, for example, residential development in locations adversely
impacted by proximity to the airport or to activities involving excessive noise, light, odors, dust,
fertilizers and insecticides (e.g. certain farm operations, mining activities, etc.).

POLICY HN10: Currituck County shall not allow the INAPPROPRIATE USE OF
MANUFACTURED OR SITE BUILT HOMES for storage, illegal occupancy or their
abandonment without proper disposal.
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT POLICIES
POLICY CD1: NEIGHBORHOOD SERVING COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS should be
encouraged to locate where a collector or secondary street intersects with a street of equal or
greater size. Appropriately designed, small-scale businesses may also be near other neighborhood
serving facilities such as schools and parks.

POLICY CD2: Commercial and office development of greater than a neighborhood scale shall be
encouraged to cluster in COMMERCIAL OR MIXED-USE CENTERS to curtail the proliferation
of strip development, and minimize traffic generation.

POLICY CD3: LARGE COMMERCIAL CENTERS should be located adjacent to the
intersections of major roadways; planned concentrations of employment and housing should be
encouraged to locate convenient to these centers.

POLICY CD4: HIGHWAY ORIENTED COMMERCIAL USES should be clustered along
Section 9: Land Use and Development Policies
9-9
segments of highways and contain land uses which are mutually compatible and reinforcing in
use and design; they should be designed in such a way as to minimize signage, access points, and
to prevent unsightly, dysfunctional STRIP DEVELOPMENT. (See esp., Policy CD9 below
concerning connected parking areas.)

POLICY CD5: Incompatible or poorly planned COMMERCIAL ENCROACHMENT within or
immediately adjoining existing residential areas shall be prohibited. Such incompatible
encroachments often include, but are not limited to, large-scale commercial uses or automobile-
oriented commercial uses such as service stations, car lots, car washes, drive through restaurants,
and the like. (Also see Policy HN9)

POLICY CD6: Appropriate OFFICE AND INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT, such as
professional offices, small churches, individual medical offices, and the like, shall be encouraged
to locate as a transitional land use between residential areas and commercial or industrial
activities of higher intensity. “Activities of higher intensity” are typically large-scale commercial
uses or automobile-oriented commercial development but may also include major thoroughfares.

POLICY CD7: Attractive, environmentally beneficial LANDSCAPING shall be provided by new
commercial or office developments, and in the rehabilitation and upgrading of existing
developments. Appropriate BUFFERING or other effective DESIGN FEATURES may be
employed to allow less intensive forms of commercial and office development to adjoin existing
or planned residential uses.

POLICY CD8: MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENTS, properly planned from the outset, which allow
for a compatible mixture of residential and non-residential uses with a pedestrian scale and
design, are encouraged. Similarly, businesses may be located adjoining (and therefore convenient
to) an existing residential area, when such businesses can be shown to satisfy design
considerations similar to a newly planned, pedestrian-scaled, mixed use development.

POLICY CD9: Businesses shall be encouraged to coordinate their SITE DESIGNS with other
nearby businesses. Design factors should include, at a minimum, shared or connected parking and
access, convenient pedestrian and vehicular movement, and consistent sign standards.
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT POLICIES
POLICY ID1: To diversify the local economy and broaden the local tax base, the County shall
encourage a public service and regulatory environment conducive to COMPATIBLE
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT. “Compatible” shall be defined as, among other things,
industries that do not adversely impact the environmental quality of the area, or overburden the
local infrastructure.

POLICY ID2: Industrial uses should not be located in areas that would diminish the desirability
of existing and planned NON-INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS, nor shall incompatible non-
industrial uses be allowed to encroach upon existing or planned industrial sites.

POLICY ID3: Industrial development shall be located on land that is physically suitable and has
unique locational advantages for industry. Advanced planning for the identification of such land
shall be encouraged. Designation of “CERTIFIED” INDUSTRIAL SITES shall be especially
pursued.

POLICY ID4: LIGHT OR LOW IMPACT INDUSTRIAL USES may be located in or near
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
9-10
existing built up areas (other than residential) to take advantage of available services and to
minimize home to work distances. Light industry is generally considered a "manufacturing
activity that uses moderate amounts of partially processed materials to produce items of relatively
high value per unit weight". Such industries tend to require less space for production, are
generally more environmentally friendly, and produce goods targeted toward consumers rather
than businesses. Examples light industrial uses include research and development facilities,
warehousing and distribution, and manufacturing of office or household goods. Careful design
and/or buffering shall be required to ensure compatibility with surrounding areas and to create a
positive image along area roadways.

POLICY ID5: WAREHOUSING, STORAGE AND DISTRIBUTION facilities shall have access
to thoroughfares of adequate traffic carrying capacity, and shall be appropriately designed and/or
visually buffered according to the visibility of their location.

POLICY ID6: New industrial development shall be encouraged to locate in existing and/or
planned INDUSTRIAL PARKS.

POLICY ID7: Facilities for the disposal of HAZARDOUS WASTE, whether chemical,
biological, radioactive or other, shall not be located in Currituck County. Neither shall Currituck
County accept SOLID WASTE FROM OUTSIDE THE COUNTY for disposal at any site inside
the county.

POLICY ID8: MINING ACTIVITIES, or secondary impacts of mining activities not subject to
permit approval by the State of North Carolina, may be subject to review and management by
Currituck County. Activities to be addressed may include, but not be limited to, the adequacy of
roads serving the mine site, visual impacts during operation and after closing of the mine site,
noise and dust considerations, etc.

POLICY ID9: Currituck County shall not support the exploration or development of ENERGY
PRODUCING FACILITIES within its jurisdiction including, but not limited to, oil and natural
gas wells, and associated staging, transportation, refinement, processing or on-shore service and
support facilities.
INFRASTRUCTURE CARRYING CAPACITY
CAMA Management Goal
Ensure that public infrastructure systems are appropriately sized, located, and managed so the
quality and productivity of AECs and other fragile areas are protected or restored.

CAMA Planning Objective
Establish level of service policies and criteria to ensure that the location and capacity of public
infrastructure is consistent with the County’s growth and development goals and the projections
of future land needs.
TRANSPORTATION POLICIES
POLICY TR1: Opportunities to enhance REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION CONNECTIONS
between Currituck County and other parts of the state and region shall be supported. The County
shall actively participate in regional transportation planning efforts.

POLICY TR2: Transportation planning shall be employed to promote a HIERARCHICAL,
FUNCTIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM and to promote the proper arrangement of land
Section 9: Land Use and Development Policies
9-11
patterns by controlling the location and appropriate use of streets, highways, trails, and other
modes of transportation. Generally, the design of major roads should give first priority to moving
traffic, while smaller roads may give greater emphasis to serving adjoining land uses.

POLICY TR3: A program of improvements and maintenance to maximize the FUNCTIONAL
LIFE OF EXISTING ROADWAYS shall be endorsed as a cost effective and environmentally
sound means of meeting area transportation needs.

POLICY TR4: ACCESS TO THE COUNTY’S MAJOR ROADWAYS shall be managed so as to
preserve the intended purpose of the highway, protect taxpayer dollars invested, and minimize
hazardous turning movements in and out of traffic flows. Methods may include, for example,
limits on the frequency of driveway cuts, shared driveway access, minimum lot frontages,
connections between adjoining parking lots, central medians, etc.

POLICY TR5: So as to preserve the traffic moving function of the County’s primary roads,
minimize traffic accidents and avoid land locking interior land parcels, Currituck County shall
discourage RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL STRIP DEVELOPMENT along the county’s
primary roads. FLAG LOTS shall not be permitted along designated roads unless justified by
unusual or unforeseeable parcel or topographic constraints.

POLICY TR6: HIGHWAY 158/168 shall receive special attention concerning the proper
development of land and properties adjoining and/or accessing this critical arterial.

POLICY TR7: A system of LOCAL CONNECTOR ROADS shall be identified and implemented
to allow local traffic to move in a north-south direction without having to use and further burden
US 158.

POLICY TR8: Local streets shall be designed and built to allow for convenient CIRCULATION
WITHIN AND BETWEEN NEIGHBORHOODS and to encourage mobility by pedestrians and
bicyclists. Care shall be taken to encourage local street “connectivity” without creating
opportunities for cut-through traffic from outside the connected areas.

POLICY TR9: BIKEWAY FACILITIES shall be encouraged as energy-efficient, healthful, and
environmentally sound alternatives to the automobile. The inclusion of bikeways, sidewalks,
trails, and other alternatives to the automobile shall be encouraged in both public and private
developments.

POLICY TR10: Designs for all future road construction and improvements shall consider
opportunities for the inclusion of BIKE LANES within the project. Particular attention should be
given to priority bikeway facility needs as submitted for inclusion in the State Transportation
Improvement Program.

POLICY TR11: ACCESS TO HIGHER INTENSITY DEVELOPMENT shall generally not be
permitted through an area of lower intensity development. For example, access to a multi-family
development, a major park facility or other large traffic generator shall not be permitted through a
local street serving a single-family residential neighborhood.

POLICY TR12: New residential developments shall provide for the installation of PAVED
PUBLIC ROADWAY AND DRAINAGE INFRASTRUCTURE at the time of development. This
policy is intended to prevent the creation of substandard developments that must later correct for
infrastructure problems that could have been avoided, had they been installed properly from the
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
9-12
beginning. Family subdivisions and non-asphalt roads serving the northern beaches are the only
exceptions to this policy.

POLICY TR13: A new MID-COUNTY BRIDGE between the mainland and Corolla shall be
supported to provide critical traffic relief to US 158, to improve emergency access to and
evacuation from the Currituck Outer Banks, to promote economic development, and to provide
better access to public and private services not readily available on the Outer Banks. To protect
the character of communities near the bridge (e.g. Aydlett, Churches Island, Poplar Branch), the
road leading to the bridge shall have no access points before its intersection with US 158.

POLICY TR14: Plans for IMPROVEMENTS TO NC 12 shall be an integral part of the planning
for the management of traffic to and from the Currituck Outer Banks.

POLICY TR15: NCDOT officials have determined that NC 168 would need to be widened to 7
lanes to accommodate projected traffic volumes in 2016. To avoid this, Currituck County shall
continue to lobby for the construction of a NEW NC 168 (MOYOCK) BYPASS.

POLICY TR16: The CURRITUCK SOUND FERRY SYSTEM shall continue to be supported as
an essential transportation service between the mainland and Knotts Island and the mainland and
Corolla.

POLICY TR17: Currituck County is not served by an interstate highway. The relative remoteness
of the County makes it attractive for many, inconvenient for others. The CURRITUCK COUNTY
AIRPORT shall continue to be supported as an important means of alternative transportation for
those traveling greater distances.

POLICY TR18: The operational success of existing and future TRANSIT SERVICES shall be
supported through the encouragement of some compact, transit-sensitive developments.
Recommendations for area transportation improvements shall recognize public and private transit
as an integral part of the transportation system.
WATER AND SEWER SERVICE POLICIES
POLICY WS1: Currituck County shall support a variety of means of obtaining potable water for
the county, thereby keeping open MULTIPLE OPTIONS FOR FUTURE WATER SUPPLIES.
These options may include ground water from shallow and deep aquifers, surface water sources
(if available), and cooperative arrangements with other public and private sources. Treatment may
be conventional, reverse osmosis or other innovative methods.

POLICY WS2: Currituck County may support efforts to REGIONALIZE AND
INTERCONNECT WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS. The benefits may include (1) lower capital
investment and operating costs per capita, (2) improved ability to meet stricter water quality
standards, (3) rate structures which balance and equalize customer charges throughout the region,
and (4) the flexibility to shift supplies, better control groundwater pumping and share capacity
during periods of high demand or limited supply.

POLICY WS3: Currituck County endorses UTILITIES EXTENSION POLICIES that focus water
and sewer services (1) within existing developed areas and in nearby targeted growth areas
identified as Full Service and Limited Service areas, (2) where development densities would
make the provision of all public services more efficient, (3) where the land is particularly well
suited for development and (4) away from environmentally sensitive areas, such as areas with
Section 9: Land Use and Development Policies
9-13
extensive wetlands or the northern beaches of the Outer Banks.

POLICY WS4: Currituck County endorses utilities extension policies that avoid those parts of the
county best suited for agriculture and to PROTECT FARMLAND FROM DEVELOPMENT
PRESSURES brought about by such utilities. Exceptions to this policy may include extensions
for major economic development initiatives, and extensions to address imminent public health
problems or related environmental hazards.

POLICY WS5: Currituck County may ASSIST IN THE EXPENSE OF EXTENDING WATER
AND SEWER services when such assistance (1) will result in the development of desirable new
or expanded industry and the creation of permanent jobs in numbers commensurate with the
expenditure required, (2) will result in a positive payback to the county’s taxpayers, in terms of
the taxes generated by the new industry versus the costs incurred, (3) would not otherwise be
provided, potentially playing a critical role in a location decision by the prospective industry, and
would not result in a significant degradation of environmental quality.

POLICY WS6: Currituck County endorses the proper use and maintenance of APPROVED
SEPTIC SYSTEMS in suitable soils as an environmentally acceptable means of treating and
dispersing waste from low-density development.

POLICY WS7: Currituck County allows for the appropriate use of PACKAGE SEWAGE
TREATMENT PLANTS as a means of achieving more efficient land use, while properly
disposing of waste. Such systems shall have a permanent organizational ownership to guarantee
their proper management, including operation, maintenance and replacement needs. Depending
on their location in the county, such systems may be required to have a design that allows for
assimilation into a centralized system at a future date.

POLICY WS8: CENTRAL AND PACKAGE TREATMENT PLANTS shall be designed using
best available technology to eliminate or reduce odors. In addition, such plants shall be properly
located so as not to adversely impact nearby land uses.

(Note: Policies on Water Treatment Discharges and Stormwater Runoff and Management are
included under the Water Quality section)
POLICIES FOR SCHOOL FACILITIES
POLICY SF1: Currituck County shall support and actively engage in ADVANCED PLANNING
FOR THE LOCATION OF NEW SCHOOLS. Such locations shall serve to reinforce contiguous
growth patterns near existing developments rather than promoting sprawl in more rural locations.
New schools shall be viewed as a cornerstone of the communities in which they are located and
shall serve to proactively influence growth.

POLICY SF2: Currituck County encourages OFFERS OF LAND FOR THE SITING OF NEW
SCHOOLS, particularly in conjunction with related community development. Acceptance of such
properties shall be based on approved location and design criteria.

POLICY SF3: Site planning for TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT AND SAFETY IN THE VICINITY
OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS shall be a priority.

POLICY SF4: Currituck County shall continue to support a service level policy for schools that
calls for the construction and maintenance of classroom space sufficient to AVOID THE USE OF
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
9-14
MOBILE CLASSROOMS.
PARKS AND RECREATION POLICIES
POLICY PR1: Future park development and open space preservation shall provide for the
rational DISTRIBUTION OF RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE opportunities within the
County.

POLICY PR2: In determining FUTURE SITES FOR PARK, RECREATION AND WATER
ACCESS FACILITIES, multiple objectives for natural area conservation, visual enhancement,
preservation of cultural and historic resources, and watershed and flood prone area protection
shall be considered.

POLICY PR3: Currituck County shall continue to work cooperatively with the County school
system to maximize the use of RECREATION FACILITIES LOCATED AT PUBLIC SCHOOL
SITES, and to foster the joint development of additional public park facilities at new public
school sites.

POLICY PR4: The County shall seek to identify, plan for and develop a system of OPEN SPACE
GREENWAYS, HIKING and BIKING TRAILS as opportunities may allow. The use of (1)
natural corridors such as streams and floodplains, and (2) man-made corridors such as utility and
transportation rights-of-way and easements, shall be emphasized.

POLICY PR5: LAND ACQUISITION for new park, recreation, and open space sites in advance
of need shall be encouraged to achieve desirable locations at cost effective levels.

POLICY PR6: All new residential development shall provide for ADEQUATE OPEN SPACE
AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENTS including, as may be appropriate, funding in
proportion to the demand created by the development. The amount of open space and
improvements may be determined according to the number of dwelling units in the development
and/or by a percentage of the total acreage in the development. Fees in lieu of land dedication
shall be based on the inflation adjusted assessed value of the development or subdivision for
property tax purposes.

POLICY PR7: New park and recreation facilities, as well as improvements to existing facilities,
shall give special consideration to the needs of HANDICAPPED PERSONS.

POLICY PR8: New mixed use developments, office and business parks, and other non-residential
areas shall be encouraged to include WALKWAYS WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT.
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT POLICIES
POLICY SW1: Currituck County belongs to the Albemarle Regional Solid Waste Management
Authority. Local area needs for solid waste collection and disposal shall continue to be met
through advanced, cooperative, REGIONAL PLANNING between the County and other member
governments participating in the Authority.

POLICY SW2: The County shall continue to pursue a variety of WASTE REDUCTION
STRATEGIES, including waste prevention, recycling and reuse.

POLICY SW3: Currituck County encourages residential COMPOSTING AND MULCHING, as
well as approved, large-site processing and recycling of organic materials, yard waste and storm
Section 9: Land Use and Development Policies
9-15
debris in volume.

POLICY SW4: Currituck County supports EDUCATION and activities that reduce litter and
illegal dumping, foster clean up of dumpsites, promote recycling and reuse, and encourage
participation in programs such as Adopt-A-Highway and the Governors Litter Sweep.

POLICY SW5: Currituck County shall enforce harsh penalties against those who would seek to
DUMP TRASH ILLEGALLY or improperly dispose of JUNKED CARS or other debris.

POLICY SW6: Currituck County supports solid waste program FINANCING STRATEGIES that
reasonably assess the costs of waste collection and disposal in accordance with the amount of
waste each generator produces, while at the same time discouraging illegal dumping.

POLICY SW7: Currituck County waste CONVENIENCE/COLLECTION AND RECYCLING
CENTERS shall continue to be designed, located, improved and maintained to facilitate their use.

POLICY SW8: Some portions of Currituck County may be provided with DOOR TO DOOR
TRASH PICK UP, based upon the characteristics of each area and the most appropriate means of
assuring proper management of waste. The Corolla area of the Outer Banks, with a highly
transient rental population, is an example of an area suitable for door-to-door service. Knotts
Island, which is far less transient and more sparsely developed, is not.
POLICIES ON PLANNING AND PAYING FOR INFRASTRUCTURE AND
SERVICES
POLICY PP1: The County shall support and actively engage in LONG RANGE PLANNING
AND BUDGETING FOR CAPITAL FACILITIES, with particular emphasis on water supply,
public schools, parkland, storm water management facilities, public safety buildings and
equipment, and other necessary facilities.

POLICY PP2: Currituck County shall continue to implement a policy of ADEQUATE PUBLIC
FACILITIES, sufficient to support associated growth and development. Such facilities may
include but not be limited to water supply, school capacity, park and open space needs, fire
fighting capability, and law enforcement.

POLICY PP3: The costs of infrastructure, facilities and services (e.g. schools, parks, water
supply, etc.) related to the DEMAND CREATED BY NEW GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT
shall be borne, in equitable proportion, by those creating the additional demand. So as to lessen
the burden on the general property tax payer, this approach may include a land transfer tax,
impact fees on new development, upzoning fees, and user fees for new facilities.
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
9-16
NATURAL HAZARD AREAS (NH)
CAMA Management Goal
Conserve and maintain barrier dunes, beaches, flood plains, and other coastal features for their
natural storm protection functions and their natural resources, giving recognition to public health,
safety, and welfare issues.

CAMA Planning Objective
Develop policies that minimize threats to life, property, and natural resources resulting from
development located in or adjacent to hazard areas, such as those subject to erosion, high winds,
storm surge, flooding, or sea level rise.
NATURAL HAZARD AREA POLICIES
POLICY NH1: The County recognizes the risks to life and property that exist within SPECIAL
FLOOD HAZARD AREAS (i.e. areas having a 1% chance of flooding in any year) that may be
inundated during major storm events. The County will continue taking measures to mitigate these
risks and will avoid taking any action in these areas that materially increases risks to life and
property.

POLICY NH2: The County shall require development and redevelopment within SPECIAL
FLOOD HAZARD AREAS to meet the standards of the National Flood Insurance Program and
the County’s Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance. Particular attention shall be given to
development in VE (i.e. velocity wave) zones concerning standards for breakaway walls, no land
disturbing activities, and no permanent enclosures below the base flood level.

POLICY NH3: New PUBLIC FACILITIES AND STRUCTURES, as well as improvements to
existing pubic facilities and structures, shall be located and designed to mitigate natural hazards.
When placement in a natural hazard area is unavoidable, compliance with the National Flood
Insurance Program and County Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance shall be required.

POLICY NH4: The County shall periodically update and enforce a HAZARD MITIGATION
PLAN that addresses the full range of natural hazards facing the county. Continuation of the
COBRA (Coastal Barriers Resource Act) zone, particularly as applied to RO-2 zoned areas
(Carova, off-road area) of the county, shall continue to be supported. The plan shall meet the
standards of the NC Division of Emergency Management and FEMA.

POLICY NH5: The County shall work in an on-going basis to improve its COMMUNTIY
RATNG SYSTEM (CRS) SCORE to make the county safer and to reduce premiums for Federal
Flood Insurance.

POLICY NH6: The County shall make EMERGENCY EVACUATION a priority in the
development and approval of transportation plans and improvements included in the NC DOT
Transportation Improvement Program.

POLICY NH7: Currituck County supports BEACH PRESERVATION AND RESTORATION
methods as recommended by current research completed by the UNC Sea Grant Program.
Generally, non-hardened, and therefore less environmentally damaging approaches to shoreline
stabilization, shall be preferred.

POLICY NH8: Currituck County encourages owners of PROPERTIES ALONG ESTUARINE
SHORELINES to employ the least hardened approach to shoreline stabilization (i.e. marsh grass
Section 9: Land Use and Development Policies
9-17
favored over riprap favored over bulkheading, etc.), provided that reasonable access is available
to install the technology available.

POLICY NH9: Currituck County encourages efforts to fully inform prospective real estate
purchasers of the inherent SHORELINE EROSION RISKS associated with oceanfront property.

POLICY NH10: The County will continue public education efforts with respect to protecting
property from hazards particularly flood and wind damage as well as construction requirements
related to the NFIP.
Water Quality
CAMA Management Goal
Maintain, protect, and where possible enhance water quality in all coastal wetlands, rivers,
streams, and estuaries.

CAMA Planning Objective
Adopt policies for coastal waters with the planning jurisdiction to help ensure that water quality is
maintained if not impaired and improved if impaired.

POLICY WQ1: Currituck County’s GROUND WATER RESOURCES shall receive a level of
protection commensurate with their enormous value. Efforts shall be made to monitor the
quantity and quality of groundwater resources, with an eye toward preventing pollution, saltwater
intrusion, or excessive drawdowns. Particular attention shall be given to locations near water and
sewer treatment plants and areas with concentrations of septic tanks.

POLICY WQ2: Currituck County supports periodic reexamination of WATER QUALITY
CLASSIFICATIONS (SA, SB, SC, etc.) with the objective of not just sustaining the status quo
but, rather, seeking to achieve higher water quality conditions and associated ratings whenever
possible.

POLICY WQ3: Currituck County supports policies, plans and actions that help protect the water
quality of the county’s estuarine system by preventing SOIL EROSION AND
SEDIMENTATION, and by controlling the quantity and quality of STORMWATER RUNOFF
entering the estuary.

POLICY WQ4: RUNOFF AND DRAINAGE from development, forestry and agricultural
activities shall be of a quality and quantity as near to natural conditions as possible. Post-
development runoff shall not exceed pre-development volumes.

POLICY WQ5: Development that preserves the NATURAL FEATURES OF THE SITE,
including existing topography and significant existing vegetation, shall be encouraged. If
COASTAL AND NON-COASTAL WETLANDS are considered part of a lot’s acreage for the
purpose of determining minimum lot size or development density, Low Impact Development
techniques or appropriate buffers shall be integrated into the development. Open space
developments shall be encouraged to REDUCE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREAS associated
with new development and redevelopment.

POLICY WQ6: Currituck County supports the retention or preservation of VEGETATED
BUFFERS along the edge of drainage ways, streams and other components of the estuarine
system as an effective, low cost means of protecting water quality.
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
9-18
POLICY WQ7: The environmental benefits of properly designed, VEGETATED ROADSIDE
DRAINAGE SWALES shall be recognized. Curb and gutter shall be reserved to developments
that are urban in character (i.e. less than 10,000 square foot lot sizes) and that are served by
adequate stormwater collection, retention and slow release facilities.

POLICY WQ8: Currituck County shall support the development and maintenance of a
countywide COMPREHENSIVE DRAINAGE AND FLOOD MANAGEMENT PLAN,
including public and private actions in support of plan implementation. Currituck County shall
support County, NCDOT and property owner cooperation in preventing and resolving stormwater
problems.

POLICY WQ9: Currituck County supports the efforts of the Currituck Soil and Water
Conservation District and the United States Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources
Conservation Service to assist farmers and timber operators in the county in implementing BEST
MANAGEMENT PRACTICES to protect and improve water quality.

POLICY WQ10: SEWAGE TREATMENT DISCHARGES shall not be permitted into the waters
of Currituck County. WATER TREATMENT DISCHARGES may be allowed if such discharge
would not cause significant degradation of water quality (e.g. negatively affecting the fisheries
resource).
LOCAL COUNTYWIDE CONCERNS
CAMA Management Goal
Integrate local concerns with the overall goals of CAMA in the context of land use planning.

CAMA Planning Objective
Identify and address local concerns and issues, such as cultural and historic areas, scenic areas,
economic development, downtown revitalization, or general health and human services needs.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT POLICIES
POLICY ED1: NEW AND EXPANDING INDUSTRIES AND BUSINESSES should be
especially encouraged that: 1) diversify the local economy, 2) train and utilize a more highly
skilled labor force, and (3) are compatible with the environmental quality and natural amenity-
based economy of Currituck County.

POLICY ED2: CAPITAL EXPENDITURES for the purpose of economic development shall be
targeted toward areas that are most suited for development. Targeted areas should include raw
land as well as the revitalization and reuse of currently unused or underutilized structures, sites
and infrastructure. Targeted areas primarily include those located within the Full Service Areas
identified on the Future Land Use Map and to a lesser extent those included in the Limited
Service Areas.

POLICY ED3: The County supports COORDINATION OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ACTIVITIES among various economic development agencies and encourages regional
cooperation and interaction among areas with shared economic interests.

POLICY ED4: In addition to the recruitment and expansion of major new industries, the
considerable value of SMALL BUSINESS START-UPS, EXPANSIONS AND SPIN-OFFS shall
also be recognized.

Section 9: Land Use and Development Policies
9-19
Also see POLICIES TR1, TR13 and TR14 concerning the relationship of transportation
improvements to economic development.
COMMUNITY APPEARANCE POLICIES
POLICY CA1: The important economic, tourism, and community image benefits of attractive,
functional MAJOR HIGHWAY CORRIDORS through Currituck County shall be recognized.
Such highway corridors, beginning with US 158 and NC 168, shall receive priority attention for
improved appearance and development standards, including driveway access, landscaping,
buffering, signage, lighting and tree preservation.

POLICY CA2: A CANOPY OF STREET TREES shall be encouraged along all major highways
in the County. This canopy may be implemented through the preservation of existing trees or the
planting of trees that will reach substantial size at maturity. The preservation or planting of such
trees shall be encouraged in the area immediately adjoining the right of way.

POLICY CA3: LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS at existing and new commercial
developments, particularly as related to breaking up and softening the appearance of expansive
parking areas, and absorbing storm water runoff, shall be required.

POLICY CA4: SIGN POLICIES AND STANDARDS should be established and periodically
updated to enhance community appearance and create a quality business image. Such standards
may be tailored to achieve different development characters for different parts of the county.

POLICY CA5: Currituck County recognizes that an attractive, less commercialized landscape,
particularly along heavily traveled land and water routes, is essential to the tourist-based economy
of the area. The placement of additional BILLBOARDS AND OFF-SITE ADVERTISING
SIGNS shall not be permitted in Currituck County.

POLICY CA6: To foster an improved community appearance, promote public safety, and help
prevent service outages, the placement of UTILITY WIRES UNDERGROUND shall be
encouraged in all public and private developments.

POLICY CA7: The County shall continue to monitor the placement of COMMUNICATION
AND OTHER TOWERS in Currituck County, and shall take action as may be determined
necessary to regulate their design and location.

POLICY CA8: The County shall not permit the INAPPROPRIATE USE OF
MANUFACTURED OR SITE BUILT HOMES for storage; nor shall abandonment be permitted
without proper maintenance or disposal/demolition.

POLICY CA9: The County shall not permit the establishment and operation of UNLICENSED
JUNKYARDS. Similarly, JUNKED CARS shall not be permitted to remain in locations visible
from any public right of way.

POLICY CA10: Organize or facilitate a program whereby JUNKED CARS MAY BE HAULED
AWAY AND RECYCLED at the least possible cost, if any, to the vehicle owners.

POLICY CA11: LITTERING OF PUBLIC ROADSIDES, SHORELINES AND OTHER
PROPERTIES, whether from individual “litterbugs”, illegal dumping, or drivers of inadequately
covered trucks, shall not be tolerated. The County supports programs that prevent litter, clean up
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
9-20
roadsides and shorelines, as well as fines that hold accountable those who would abuse the
environment and denigrate the image of the area.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION POLICIES
POLICY HP1: Local efforts to identify, designate and preserve SITES, BUILDINGS AND
DISTRICTS OF PARTICULAR HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE shall be supported.

POLICY HP2: Multiple and appropriate ADAPTIVE REUSE OF HISTORIC RESOURCES
shall be encouraged.

POLICY HP3: Development of the TOURISM AND EDUCATIONAL POTENTIAL of the
area's architectural, historic and cultural resources shall be encouraged.

POLICY HP4: The DESTRUCTION OF SIGNIFICANT ARCHITECTURAL, HISTORIC AND
ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES in the planning area shall be discouraged.

POLICY HP5: DEVELOPMENT SITES CONTAINING SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC
RESOURCES shall be encouraged to honor such resources within the design of their
development proposals. Opportunities may include, for example, incorporating such resources
into common open space, donating such areas for tax credits, or making such areas available for
acquisition and preservation.

POLICY HP6: Economic development efforts shall encourage the REVITALIZATION AND
REUSE of currently unused or underutilized structures, sites and infrastructure in appropriately
located areas.

POLICY HP7: The County, working in cooperation with non-profit groups and private
organizations, shall seek to maintain and restore the architectural and cultural HERITAGE OF
VARIOUS “COMMUNITIES” in Currituck County.
POLICIES ON PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES
POLICY PS1: As the area grows, the County may establish strategically located SUBSTATIONS
FOR PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES (i.e. law enforcement, fire fighting and rescue), provided
that sufficient resources can be made available to properly staff and equip them.

POLICY PS2: Currituck County shall support and encourage the development and improvement
of FIRE FIGHTING SERVICES that enhance the security and safety of life and property, while
resulting in the added benefit of lower property insurance rates. The need for additional fire
stations or improvements to existing fire stations shall be examined annually to keep pace with
the growth of the area.

Also see POLICIES TR13 and TR14 concerning the relationship of transportation improvements
to emergency evacuation, enhanced emergency medical services, and improved law enforcement
for the Currituck Outer Banks.
SPECIAL POLICIES APPLICABLE COUNTYWIDE
POLICY CW1: Currituck County may elect to amend or incorporate adopted small area plans
into the Land Use Plan as needed. This includes consideration of citizen initiated amendments or
county led planning efforts that recognize changing demographic, economic, or environmental
conditions.
Section 9: Land Use and Development Policies
9-21
SUBAREA CONCERNS
This section addresses concerns that may be associated with one of three sub-areas of the county:
(1) the Mainland (2) the Outer Banks and (3) Knotts Island. In some instances, issues of special
concern clearly warrant a distinct policy. In other instances, the concern has been addressed in
other parts of the plan, eliminating the need to set forth duplicate policies here.
SPECIAL POLICIES APPLICABLE TO THE MAINLAND
POLICY ML1: Currituck County recognizes the particular interest of residents and property
owners in the Mainland Area in PRESERVING FARMLAND AND OPEN SPACE. The County
shall exercise diligence in applying policies, plans and actions that will encourage compact
growth and the preservation of farmland and open space in the Mainland Area.

POLICY ML2: Currituck County supports efforts to establish a modern INDUSTRIAL PARK in
the Mainland Area, developed in accordance with State approved standards and certifications.

POLICY ML3: The interests of Mainland Area residents in having ACCESS TO THE AREA’S
OCEAN AND ESTUARINE WATERS shall be fostered through County actions to increase the
number of additional public access sites at a rate commensurate with the population growth of the
Currituck County. Included in the actions taken to increase public access shall be a consideration
given to transportation needs, including boat docks and ferry services.

POLICY ML4: Currituck County recognizes that the appearance and traffic moving function of
the NC 168/ US 158 CORRIDOR is of exceptional importance to both the near term quality of
life and long-term economic prospects for residents and property owners in the Mainland Area.
The Transportation and Community Appearance policy sections of this plan shall be implemented
to give priority to this issue.
SPECIAL POLICIES APPLICABLE TO THE OUTER BANKS
POLICY OB1: Currituck County supports the provision of INFRASTRUCTURE (e.g. potable
water) AND SERVICES (e.g. law enforcement officers) adequate to meet basic quality of life and
public health and safety requirements of residents on the Outer Banks, while at the same not
stimulating inappropriate intensive development in environmentally fragile, hazardous barrier
island areas.

POLICY OB2: So as to minimize COMMERCIAL STRIP DEVELOPMENT and maximize the
traffic moving capability of NC 12, Currituck County shall encourage commercial development
to cluster at appropriate locations rather than dispersing along NC 12.

POLICY OB3: Currituck County recognizes that, on the Outer Banks in particular, “single
family” homes are being built that accommodate 15, 20, 25 or more people. Thus, these LARGE
RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES are circumventing existing zoning laws that could not anticipate
the advent of these building forms. Development regulations and project approvals shall therefore
be based upon the actual nature of the structure rather than the label (e.g. single family) that may
be attached to it.

POLICY OB4: Currituck County supports policies and actions that require the square footage,
number of bedrooms, and/or occupancy levels of RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES to be
determined in proportion to lot size, as well as public health and safety issues concerning water
supply and sewage disposal, fire safety, emergency services, parking, traffic loads during
evacuations, etc.
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
9-22

POLICY OB5: Currituck County, through its actions and decisions, shall seek to preserve the
historic character and heritage of the COROLLA VILLAGE area of the Outer Banks.

POLICY OB6: Concerning the OFF-ROAD AREAS OF THE OUTER BANKS, Currituck
County shall not permit or encourage the provision of growth-inducing facilities and services to
these areas, including for example, commercial services, centralized sewage treatment and hard
surface roads.

POLICY OB7: VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE NORTH BEACHES (off-road area) shall not
compromise the environmental integrity of wildlife refuges, the estuarine research reserve, other
ecologically sensitive areas, or habitat for wild horses. Structures or other man-made
improvements not specifically serving the public interest shall not be permitted to block vehicular
access along the beach.

POLICY OB8: In order to protect WILD HORSES, Currituck County shall not permit nor
encourage the provision of hard surface roads in the off-road area of Carova.

POLICY OB9: LARGE HOMES ON OCEANFRONT LOTS IN THE OFF-ROAD AREA
should be located as far west as possible. Structures should not be built forward of protective
dunes, thereby impeding dune recovery. County minimum setbacks may exceed CAMA
minimum setbacks in ocean erodible areas.
SPECIAL POLICIES APPLICABLE TO KNOTTS ISLAND
POLICY KI1: The need for ACCESS TO PUBLIC TRUST WATERS in the Knotts Island area
shall be met through periodic improvements to existing public facilities. The County also
recognizes that private sector facilities may play a role in satisfying access needs to the water.

POLICY KI2: Currituck County shall encourage NCDOT efforts to provide essential
maintenance and improvements to ROADS AND ROADSIDE DITCHES serving the Knotts
Island Area, especially including the Marsh Causeway Bridge.

POLICY KI3: Currituck County shall support efforts to improve community services in the
Knotts Island area. Services which may warrant improvement include: (1) FIRE SERVICE, to
address fire safety as well as reducing insurance costs and (2) COMMUNICATIONS following
major storm events (3) access to LIBRARY SERVICES, and (4) access to INDOOR
RECREATION facilities.

POLICY KI4: Currituck County shall not provide or encourage the provision of
INFRASTRUCTURE OR UTILITIES that would foster greater development densities on Knotts
Island, including particularly, centralized sewage treatment services.

POLICY KI5: Land use and zoning initiatives on Knotts Island shall give consideration to
limiting MANUFACTURED HOME (I.E. MOBILE HOME) PLACEMENTS in this part of the
county.

Section 10: Relationship of Plan to Management Topics
10-1
SECTION 10: RELATIONSHIP OF PLAN TO
MANAGEMENT TOPICS

The planning guidelines require the local government to provide two types of analysis of its land
use and development policies and the future land use map. Each analysis is described below.
Consistency between Goals/Policies and Management Topics
A. Public Access.
Applicable Goal from Section 8:
• To provide suitable public access opportunities to the County’s public trust waters
and shorelines so as to allow for a wide range of activities.

Analysis: The policies call for a wide variety of additional public and private access opportunities
to all waters of Currituck County. Cooperation between public agencies to identify joint use sites
and opportunities are to be especially encouraged. Reviews and approvals of waterfront
developments are to address the protection of public access to the water resource, both physically
and visually. Finally, recommended actions include the preparation of a new plan for public
access to the ocean and sound. Such a plan would be able to complete the detailed research
necessary to identify opportunity sites and the methods to be employed to procure the sites.
B. Land Use Compatibility.
Applicable Goal from Section 8:
• To properly development forms in accordance with the suitability of the land,
infrastructure available and the compatibility of surrounding land uses.

Analysis: The plan calls for development to be located where soils are suitable. Prime agricultural
lands are to be conserved by encouraging new development to locate in areas where appropriate
infrastructure and access to services is available. Compact, mixed-use developments are to be
encouraged so as to minimize sprawl and discourage automobile dependency. New commercial
development of a scale and design compatible with nearby residential areas is also to be
encouraged for similar reasons. The compatibility of mining operations, such as borrow pits for
fill material, is also addressed.
C. Infrastructure Carrying Capacity
Applicable Goal from Section 8:
• To avoid taking or approving actions related to infrastructure and the provision of
services that could induce intensive development in environmentally fragile areas;
examples include the north beaches of the Outer Banks and Knotts Island.
• To preserve the traffic carrying capacity of existing roadways and provision of new
roadways and roadway improvements in accordance with carefully developed plans.
Analysis: The plan’s policies emphasize the need to protect the function of existing roadways as
cost effective and environmentally sound. Methods include limiting driveway cuts, discouraging
strip development and flag lots along major roadways, and requiring adjoining parking lots to be
connected. Highway158/168 is singled out for special protections. Support for the construction of
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
10-2
the proposed Mid-County Bridge is set forth, along with related improvements to NC 12 on the
Currituck Outer Banks. Multiple options for future water supply resources are advocated. Water
and sewer extension polices are to be used to proactively direct growth rather than passively
respond to it. Criteria for the appropriate use of septic systems and package sewage treatment
plants are set forth. Advanced planning for schools and park facilities is also supported along with
certain criteria for their location. Policies call for the assignment of infrastructure costs to the new
growth creating the demand for services.
D. Natural and Man-Made Hazards
Applicable Goal from Section 8:
• To exercise caution, foresight, and common sense in dealing with the risks of coastal
development.

Analysis: The plan calls for continued enforcement of the standards of the National Flood
Insurance Program and provisions of the County’s flood damage prevention ordinance. Further,
to improve the County’s insurance rating under the “Community Rating System”, the plan
recommends amending the UDO to require a minimum of one (1) foot of “freeboard” above the
minimum NFIP base flood elevations. Expansion of the Currituck County Mitigation Plan to
include a Post Storm Reconstruction Plan is also advocated. Finally, the plan calls for the creation
of an interagency task force whose purpose is to develop a plan for the RO-2 COBRA zone to
address growth issues likely to come about as a result of the proposed mid-county bridge.
E. Water Quality.
Applicable Goals from Section 8:
• To preserve and improve water quality in the coastal waters of Currituck County.
• To preserve critical natural areas as the source of biological diversity and
productivity of the County’s ocean and estuarine environments.

Analysis: Under the plan’s policies, wetlands are to be conserved for multiple reasons, including
flood hazard mitigation, water quality preservation, and habitat protection. New developments are
to preserve a vegetated buffer along estuarine shorelines. Runoff and drainage from development,
forestry and agricultural activities is to be of a quality and quantity as near to natural conditions
as possible. The State is to be petitioned for a reexamination of water quality designations in
Currituck Sound, to have those designations elevated if possible. A countywide drainage and
flood management plan, including public and private actions is to be undertaken.
F. Local Concerns
Applicable Goals from Section 8:
• To conserve the County’s remaining prime agricultural areas, while recognizing the
economic realities of farm operations and private property rights.
• To diversify the County’s economic base, to include environmentally compatible
businesses and industries that reach beyond the tourist-based economy.
• To protect and conserve the area’s natural beauty and coastal resources as the
County’s greatest asset for economic development and a high quality of life.

Analysis: The plan has three major goals (above) that embody major local concerns: (1)
balancing the preservation of farmland with private property rights, (2) promoting a diverse local
Section 10: Relationship of Plan to Management Topics
10-3
economy and (3) protecting the areas natural beauty and resources. The relationship of the plan’s
policies and actions to these goals is summarized below.
1. Farmland Preservation. The plan encourages land use patterns and voluntary
actions by landowners to help protect the county's remaining prime
agricultural areas.
2. Economic Development. The plan identifies the characteristics of businesses
that are consistent with the county's goals for both economic development
and environmental quality.
3. Community Appearance. The plan address several major issues related to
community appearance: development conditions along the County’s major
highway corridors, proper disposal of abandoned mobile homes, better
controls over junk yards and junked cars and stronger enforcement of anti-
litter laws.
Consistency between Future Land Use Map and CAMA Land Use Plan
Requirements.
Residential Development Density
Analysis: The residential densities depicted on the map for each major land class and planning
subarea are consistent with the capabilities of the county's natural systems. Typical density levels
are:

Table 10.1 Future Land Classifications Related to Development Density
Major Land Class Development Density

Conservation 1 unit per 3 acres or less
Rural Areas 1 unit per 3 acres or less
Limited Service Areas Base Density - 1 unit per acre
Overlay Zones – up to 1.5 units per acre
Served by individual on-site waste water
Neighborhood commercial uses
Full Service Areas Base Density – 2 units per acre
Overlay Zones – 3-4 units per acre
Served by central sewer
Large scale commercial uses

Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
10-4
Table 10.2 Sub-Areas Related to Development Density
Sub-Areas Development Intensity
Moyock Full Service
Limited Service
Rural
Conservation
Base Density of 2 units per acre with significant area of 1 unit
per acre
Shawboro/Crawford Primarily Rural and Conservation
Base Density of 1 unit per 3 acres
Courthouse Area Primarily Full Service and Limited Service
Base Density of 2 units per acre
Barco/Coinjock/Airport Area Primarily Full Service and Limited Service
Base Density of 2 units per acre
Intersection of Proposed Mid-
County Bridge and US
Highway 158
Primarily Limited Service
Base Density of 1 unit per acre
Aydlett and
Waterlily/Churches Island
Primarily Limited Service
Base Density of 1 unit per acre
Grandy Primarily Full Service and Limited Service
Base Density of 2 units per acre
Jarvisburg Primarily Limited Service
Base Density of 1 unit per acre
Point Harbor Primarily Limited Service with an area of Full Service
Base Density of primarily 1 unit per acre with limited 2 units
per acre
Corolla Full Service
Base Density of 3 units per acre
Carova Limited Service and Conservation
Base Density of 1 unit per 3 acres
Knotts Island and Gibbs
Woods
Limited Service and Conservation
Base Density of 1 unit per 3 acre

Comparison of Environmental Composite Map, Land Suitability Map,
and Land Classification Map.
Environmental Composite Map and Land Classification Map
Analysis: These maps are very consistent with each other. There are only two (2) readily
identifiable differences between the maps. The first concerns certain limited areas shown as
Class III on the Environmental Map that are shown as High Suitability on the Land Suitability
Map. This difference, in turn, carries over to the Land Classification Map. This difference can be
explained, however, by the fact that the Class III areas in question have been designated as such
due to their Severe Limitations for Septic Tanks. Since these areas are served by central or
package sewage treatment plants, the Class III designation has no material significance. The
second difference is in the vicinity of the Regional Airport in Maple. The Environmental
Composite Map shows the area to be Class I (minimal hazards for development) and Class II, yet
the Land Suitability Map indicates this area as “Least Suitable” for development. The
Section 10: Relationship of Plan to Management Topics
10-5
discrepancy is likely to due with the fact that the airport is located on a former dump site.
Land Suitability Map and Land Classification Map
Analysis: Generally there are no material differences between these maps. By and large all of
the areas shown on the Land Suitability Map as Least Suitable are classified as Conservation on
the Land Classification Map. It should be noted however that in an effort to make the Future
Land Use Map easier to interpret, pockets of land considered Least Suitable for development that
would ordinarily be classified as Conservation are shown as Limited Service or Full Service
Areas. Every effort was made to create the boundaries of the land use classifications following
natural boundaries, parcel lines, and roads for ease of use. The pockets of Least Suitable land
included in the Limited Service and Full Service Areas are generally environmentally sensitive
and subject to additional federal, state, or local restrictions limiting their development regardless
of the land use classification.
Comparison of Spatial Patterns of Land Classification and Planned Extension
of Water and Sewer Services
Analysis: The likelihood of the future provision of centralized or package sewage collection and
treatment services was a primary factor in identifying lands shown as Full Service Areas on the
Land Classification Map. While the County has no plans to create additional centralized sewage
services, the County recognizes that some areas served by package treatment services in the near
term may be appropriate for absorption into a larger consolidated system in the future. Policies
therefore call for the installation of collection systems with piping and other components
compatible with a larger area system. The availability of centralized water services in Currituck
County is not considered to be a critical factor in development decisions and the spatial pattern of
land classes.
Natural Hazards: Land Use and Development in Natural Hazard Areas
Analysis:
• Policies for land uses in the high hazard flood area adopt the CAMA use standards.
The use standards ensure that risks to life and property in these areas are reasonable.
• In flood hazard areas, the County will continue to enforce its flood damage
prevention ordinance and the state building code to manage risks.
• The County’s major evacuation route is the 158 and 168 highway corridor. Plans call
for widening this roadway as necessary to keep up with traffic volumes, including
possibly from 5 to 7 lanes. Longer range possibilities include the proposed Mid-
County Bridge, offering a more direct evacuation route from the Currituck Outer
Banks, and the proposed 168 Bypass offering an alternative route around the west
side of the rapidly growing Moyock area.
Comparison of Spatial Patterns of Land Classification and Protection of
Shellfish Waters
Analysis: As noted previously in this plan (See Section 3: Natural Systems Analysis), there are
no commercial shellfish areas in Currituck County, largely due to non-supporting salinity levels
in the sound.
Analysis of Impacts of Currituck County Policies and Actions on
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
10-6
Management Topics
Public Access Policies Impact on:

PUBLIC ACCESS: Do the access policies result in additional public access opportunities to
river, creek, sound, and beach areas? Will such access points be environmentally compatible
with their location?

Beneficial
• Calls for the preparation of a special plan for public access opportunity sites at the
regional, local, and neighborhood level. (Detailed planning needed).
• Encourages multiple uses of publicly owned properties, including opportunities for
public access.
• Encourages marinas in upland locations to avoid ‘consuming’ public trust water in
open water marinas.
• Calls for development standards to ensure environmental compatibility.
• Discourages developments that would ‘wall off’ the water from view.
• Calls for standards and incentives for waterfront projects that preserve and provide
for public access.
• Calls for a fee in lieu of land dedication to fund public access.
• Calls for removal of structures on the beach blocking public access.
• Continues the requirement that major subdivisions provide for public access to
adjoining waters.

LAND USE COMPATIBILITY: Do the policies promote development patterns that protect
natural systems while protecting development from natural and man-made hazards? Do the
policies allow for economic development while providing clear direction for land use decision-
making?

Neutral-Beneficial
• Requires new marinas to be environmentally compatible with their location and
adjoining land uses.

Infrastructure and Carrying Capacity: Are the development patterns encouraged by the
policies consistent with location and capacity of water, sewer, roads, and stormwater systems?
Do they help prevent harm to AEC’s and fragile areas? Do the policies support the desired
pattern of growth?

Neutral-Beneficial
• Encourage multiple uses of publicly owned properties, for various infrastructure
purposes.
• Calls for a fee in lieu of land dedication to fund public access facilities.
• Continues the requirement that major subdivisions provide for public access to
adjoining waters.

NATURAL HAZARD AREAS: Do the policies work to conserve barrier dunes, beaches,
floodplains, and other features that provide natural storm protection? Do the policies help
minimize threats to life, property and natural resources by appropriate design and locational
criteria?
Section 10: Relationship of Plan to Management Topics
10-7

Neutral-Beneficial
• Offers incentives for the construction of no-wetland, upland marinas, thereby
conserving the value of the wetland resource.
• Calls for the preservation of a buffer strip of land along the estuarine shoreline,
thereby proving a measure of protection during storm events.
• Requires the removal of structures on the beach that could pose a hazard to the
public.

WATER QUALITY: Do the policies maintain, protect and, if possible, enhance water quality in
wetlands and bodies of water?

Beneficial –Neutral
• Disapproves of any marina that fails to meet environmental quality standards.
• Promotes the Clean Marina program.
• Requires development standards for boat ramps and parking areas that address
stormwater runoff and water quality concerns, among others.
• Calls for incentives for the preservation of a strip of land adjoining the water’s edge.
• Provides incentives for non-wetland, upland marinas.

LOCAL COUNTYWIDE CONCERNS: Do the policies maintain, protect and, if possible,
enhance water quality in wetlands and bodies of water?

Neutral Beneficial
• Supports additional public access as essential to the health of the local economy.

LAND USE COMPATIBILITY: Environmentally Sensitive Areas,
Agricultural/Rural Preservation, Housing and Neighborhood Development,
Commercial Development, Industrial Development Policies Impact on:

PUBLIC ACCESS: Do the access policies result in additional public access opportunities to
river, creek, sound, and beach areas? Will such access points be environmentally compatible
with their location?

Beneficial-Neutral
• Calls for the preservation of a naturally vegetated buffer area along all estuarine
shorelines, to help preserve views to and from the water.
• Requires uses in estuarine waters to be water dependent, such as structures for public
access (docks, piers, ramps, etc.).
• Calls for greater controls on the length of piers that would otherwise block the
public’s movement in public trust waters.
• Withholds support for any action that would commercialize the public beach.
• Encourages conservation easements that could potentially benefit public access
opportunities.

LAND USE COMPATIBILITY: Do the policies promote development patterns that protect
natural systems while protecting development from natural and man-made hazards? Do the
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
10-8
policies allow for economic development while providing clear direction for land use decision-
making?

Beneficial
• Requires that development be located on suitable soils.
• Calls for the conservation of remaining wetland areas.
• Requires that areas slated for future growth avoid natural heritage areas and similar
lands.
• Calls for a review of zoning and permitted land uses to be consistent with
environmentally sensitive areas.
• Requires that County actions on infrastructure guide new development to targeted
growth areas.
• Calls for preservation of prime agricultural lands.
• Calls for the application of zoning and other growth management tools to avoid
leapfrog development.
• Encourages a variety of housing forms to meet all income levels.
• Prohibits residential developments that would place inhabitants in a location subject
to incompatible development or man-made hazards.
• Establishes locational criteria for residential, office, and institutional, commercial and
industrial land uses.
• Encourages compatible industrial development for economic diversification.

Infrastructure and Carrying Capacity: Are the development patterns encouraged by the
policies consistent with location and capacity of water, sewer, roads, and stormwater systems?
Do they help prevent harm to AEC’s and fragile areas? Do the policies support the desired
pattern of growth?

Beneficial-Neutral
• Requires adequate infrastructure as a condition for development to proceed.
• Calls for new developments to locate in environmentally suitable areas and
convenient to adequate infrastructure, thereby reinforcing planned infrastructure.
• Encourages development patterns that support transportation alternatives beyond the
automobile.
• Calls for commercial and industrial developments to locate consistent with the
available road infrastructure.

Natural Hazard Areas: Do the policies work to conserve barrier dunes, beaches, floodplains,
and other features that provide natural storm protection? Do the policies help minimize threats to
life, property and natural resources by appropriate design and locational criteria?

Beneficial-Neutral
• Calls for the conservation of remaining wetland areas.
• Specifies that a high level of protection be afforded to maritime forests and sand
dunes when reviewing development proposals.
• Calls for the avoidance of natural heritage areas, which have the added benefit of
mitigating storm hazards.
• Prohibits new residential developments that would expose residents to environmental
hazards.

Section 10: Relationship of Plan to Management Topics
10-9
Water Quality: Do the policies maintain, protect and, if possible, enhance water quality in
wetlands and bodies of water?

Beneficial-Neutral
• Calls for the conservation of remaining wetland areas, as important filter of
stormwater runoff.
• Calls for the preservation of a naturally vegetated buffer area along all estuarine
shorelines, as a means of preventing pollutants from entering estuarine waters.
• Disapproves of the disposal of hazardous waste in Currituck County, as well as solid
waste from outside the county.
• Calls for regulatory standards for mining operations in excess of state requirements,
including sludge disposal and water reclamation.

Local Countywide Concerns: Do the policies maintain, protect and, if possible, enhance water
quality in wetlands and bodies of water?

Beneficial-Neutral
• Calls for the preservation of a naturally vegetated buffer area along all estuarine
shorelines, to help preserve views to and from the water.
• Calls for preservation of prime agricultural land (economic value as well as way of
life).
• Calls for a variety of affordable housing types, including housing for senior citizens
and for seasonal workers.
• Calls for environmentally compatible industrial development to diversity the local
economy.
INFRASTRUCTURE CARRYING CAPACITY: Transportation, Water and
Sewer Service, School Facilities, Solid Waste Management, Parks and
Recreation, Paying for Infrastructure and Services Impact on:

PUBLIC ACCESS: Do the access policies result in additional public access opportunities to
river, creek, sound, and beach areas? Will such access points be environmentally compatible
with their location?

Beneficial-Neutral
• Calls for a Mid-County Bridge that would enhance public access to the Outer Banks
of Currituck County, especially for day-trippers.
• Continues support for ferry service between the Mainland and other points in the
county, thereby providing for ‘public access’ to the sound for those who may not
have other means of getting on the water.
• Calls for advanced planning for park sites that serve multiple objectives, including
opportunities for public access.
• Calls for hiking and biking trails within natural stream corridors.
• Calls for open space and parkland dedication, or fees in lieu of such dedications,
which could include public access sites.
• Calls for development of new revenue sources directly related to the mitigation of
development impacts, to be paid for by the new development creating the demand.
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
10-10
Revenues could then be applied to public access sites among other service and
infrastructure needs.

LAND USE COMPATIBILITY: Do the policies promote development patterns that protect
natural systems while protecting development from natural and man-made hazards? Do the
policies allow for economic development while providing clear direction for land use decision-
making?

Beneficial
• Supports regional transportation connections in furtherance of economic
development.
• Generally does not permit access to a higher density development though a lower
density development.
• Requires development along roads leading to the proposed Mid-County Bridge to be
of especially high quality.
• Encourages the use of utility extensions to influence the desired pattern of growth
and protect farmland from development, while allowing for beneficial economic
development where justified.
• Calls for an assessment of secondary impacts related to the Mid-County Bridge
including likely land use impacts.
• Calls for special development standards for US 158 and NC 168.
• Calls for the proactive placement of schools to influence a desired growth pattern.
• Calls for consistency between infrastructure and the new development it must
support.

INFRASTRUCTURE AND CARRYING CAPACITY: Are the development patterns
encouraged by the policies consistent with location and capacity of water, sewer, roads, and
stormwater systems? Do they help prevent harm to AEC’s and fragile areas? Do the policies
support the desired pattern of growth?

Beneficial
• Calls for regional cooperation in transportation planning and road improvements.
• Calls for preserving the traffic moving function of existing roads, through access
management.
• Calls for a special highway corridor overlay district on US 158 and NC 168 to
preserve the function and aesthetics of this primary spine road.
• Calls for consistency between infrastructure and new development
• Calls for development on roads leading to the proposed Mid-County Bridge to be of
exceptional quality thereby preserving taxpayer investment in the bridge.
• Allows the use of package sewage treatment plants to encourage more efficient land
use, with the objective of connecting smaller treatment facilities together in the
future.
• Calls for even greater emphasis on requiring adequate public facilities to support new
growth and development.
• Calls for the development of new revenue sources directly related to the mitigation of
development impacts, to be paid for by the new development creating the demand.

NATURAL HAZARD AREAS: Do the policies work to conserve barrier dunes, beaches,
Section 10: Relationship of Plan to Management Topics
10-11
floodplains, and other features that provide natural storm protection? Do the policies help
minimize threats to life, property and natural resources by appropriate design and locational
criteria?

Beneficial-Neutral
1 Calls for the selection of open space and park sites using multiple objectives, including
watershed and flood prone area protection.
2 Calls for the establishment of a system of open space greenways, including streams and
floodplains.
3 Prohibits any new wastewater treatment plant from locating in any Area of
Environmental Concern.

WATER QUALITY: Do the policies maintain, protect and, if possible, enhance water quality in
wetlands and bodies of water?

Neutral-Beneficial
• Calls for the establishment of an education program for the proper maintenance of
septic tanks and financial incentives for discounted pump out service.
• Prohibits new wastewater treatment plants from locating in an AEC.

Local Countywide Concerns: Do the policies maintain, protect and, if possible, enhance water
quality in wetlands and bodies of water?

Beneficial-Neutral
• Calls for enhanced regional highway connections as critical to long-term economic
development.
• Endorses the strategic use of utilities extensions to support desirable economic
development opportunities.
• Calls for harsh penalties against illegal dumping and improper disposal of junked
cars.
• Calls for special highway corridor development controls along NC 168 and US 158.
NATURAL HAZARD AREAS IMPACT ON:

PUBLIC ACCESS: Do the access policies result in additional public access opportunities to
river, creek, sound, and beach areas? Will such access points be environmentally compatible
with their location?

Neutral-Beneficial
• Calls for beach preservation and restoration methods that employ non-hardening
approaches, thereby preserving the sand beach for the public.
• Calls for estuarine shoreline property owners to use the least hardened approach to
shoreline stabilization, thereby preserving the intertidal zone for access by the public.

LAND USE COMPATIBILITY: Do the policies promote development patterns that protect
natural systems while protecting development from natural and man-made hazards? Do the
policies allow for economic development while providing clear direction for land use decision-
making?
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
10-12

Neutral-Beneficial
• Requires development and redevelopment within flood hazard areas to meet special
building standards and other requirements.

Infrastructure and Carrying Capacity: Are the development patterns encouraged by the
policies consistent with location and capacity of water, sewer, roads, and stormwater systems?
Do they help prevent harm to AEC’s and fragile areas? Do the policies support the desired
pattern of growth?

Beneficial
• Calls for new public facilities and structures to be located to avoid natural hazard
areas or, if unavoidable, to be designed to mitigate against such hazards.
• Supports continuation of the COBRA policies for the north beach area, denying
infrastructure investments that would facilitate growth there.

Natural Hazard Areas: Do the policies work to conserve barrier dunes, beaches, floodplains,
and other features that provide natural storm protection? Do the policies help minimize threats to
life, property and natural resources by appropriate design and locational criteria?

Beneficial
• Requires development and redevelopment within flood hazard areas to meet special
building standards and other requirements.
• Calls for new public facilities and structures to be located to avoid natural hazard
areas or, if unavoidable, to be designed to mitigate against such hazards.
• Calls for beach preservation methods that employ non-hardening approaches, thereby
preserving the sand beach for the public.
• Calls for estuarine shoreline property owners to use the least hardened approach to
shoreline stabilization, thereby preserving the intertidal zone for wave action
amelioration.
• Requires real estate agents to disclose risks of building in hazardous location.

WATER QUALITY: Do the policies maintain, protect and, if possible, enhance water quality in
wetlands and bodies of water?

Neutral

Local Countywide Concerns: Do the policies maintain, protect and, if possible, enhance water
quality in wetlands and bodies of water?

Neutral
WATER QUALITY IMPACT ON:

PUBLIC ACCESS: Do the access policies result in additional public access opportunities to
river, creek, sound, and beach areas? Will such access points be environmentally compatible
with their location?
Section 10: Relationship of Plan to Management Topics
10-13

Neutral-Beneficial
• Calls for the preservation of a naturally vegetated buffer area along all estuarine
shorelines, to help protect water quality, while also preserving views to and from the
shoreline.
• Calls for the identification of land parcels for acquisition or restoration, largely to
protect water quality, but would also provide opportunity sites for public access.

LAND USE COMPATIBILITY: Do the policies promote development patterns that protect
natural systems while protecting development from natural and man-made hazards? Do the
policies allow for economic development while providing clear direction for land use decision-
making?

Neutral-Beneficial
• Calls for developments to preserve the natural features of the site.

INFRASTRUCTURE AND CARRYING CAPACITY: Are the development patterns
encouraged by the policies consistent with location and capacity of water, sewer, roads, and
stormwater systems? Do they help prevent harm to AEC’s and fragile areas? Do the policies
support the desired pattern of growth?

Neutral-Beneficial
• Calls for groundwater monitoring, especially near water and sewer treatment plants.

NATURAL HAZARD AREAS: Do the policies work to conserve barrier dunes, beaches,
floodplains, and other features that provide natural storm protection? Do the policies help
minimize threats to life, property and natural resources by appropriate design and locational
criteria?

Beneficial-Neutral
• Calls for developments to preserve the natural features of the site, including wetland
areas that absorb stormwater runoff and potential flooding.
• Calls for the development of a comprehensive drainage and flood management plan.
• Calls for continued implementation of ordinance requiring certification that new
development will not cause flooding on adjoining properties.

WATER QUALITY: Do the policies maintain, protect and, if possible, enhance water quality in
wetlands and bodies of water?

Beneficial
• Calls for ground water monitoring.
• Calls for policies and actions to prevent soil erosion and sedimentation and minimize
stormwater runoff to a degree more restrictive than State standards.
• Calls for the preservation of a naturally vegetated buffer area along all estuarine
shorelines, to help protect water quality.
• Calls for the identification of land parcels for acquisition or restoration, largely to
protect water quality.
• Calls for comprehensive drainage and flood management plan.
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
10-14
• Prohibits sewage treatment discharges and limits water treatment discharges into the
waters of Currituck County.

LOCAL COUNTYWIDE CONCERNS: Do the policies maintain, protect and, if possible,
enhance water quality in wetlands and bodies of water?

Neutral
LOCAL COUNTYWIDE CONCERNS: Economic Development, Community
Appearance, Historic Preservation, Public Safety Services, Special Policies
impact on:

PUBLIC ACCESS: Do the access policies result in additional public access opportunities to
river, creek, sound, and beach areas? Will such access points be environmentally compatible
with their location?

Neutral

LAND USE COMPATIBILITY: Do the policies promote development patterns that protect
natural systems while protecting development from natural and man-made hazards? Do the
policies allow for economic development while providing clear direction for land use decision-
making?

Beneficial
• Establishes criteria for identifying desirable new business and industry.
• Calls for coordination among economic development agencies and encourages
regional cooperation and interaction.
• Acknowledges the value of small business start-ups, expansions and spin-offs.
• Calls for the advanced identification of primary and secondary sites suited for
compatible industrial development.
• Reinforces the need for special development controls along US 158 and NC 168.
• Calls for community character districts in locations of significant historic
significance such as around the old courthouse in Currituck and in Corolla Village.
• Encourages Plan updates to reflect changing demographic, economic, and
environmental conditions.

INFRASTRUCTURE AND CARRYING CAPACITY: Are the development patterns
encouraged by the policies consistent with location and capacity of water, sewer, roads, and
stormwater systems? Do they help prevent harm to AEC’s and fragile areas? Do the policies
support the desired pattern of growth?

Beneficial-Neutral
• Encourages the placement of overhead utilities underground to help prevent service
outages.
• Requires controls over the placement of communication towers and other towers in
the county.
• Calls for an evaluation of the need for additional public safety substations in the
county.
Section 10: Relationship of Plan to Management Topics
10-15
NATURAL HAZARD AREAS: Do the policies work to conserve barrier dunes, beaches,
floodplains, and other features that provide natural storm protection? Do the policies help
minimize threats to life, property and natural resources by appropriate design and locational
criteria?

Neutral

WATER QUALITY: Do the policies maintain, protect and, if possible, enhance water quality in
wetlands and bodies of water?

Neutral-Beneficial
• Prohibits littering of shorelines, including litterbugs and illegal dumping.

LOCAL COUNTYWIDE CONCERNS: Do the policies maintain, protect and, if possible,
enhance water quality in wetlands and bodies of water?

Beneficial
• Encourages new and expanding industries that satisfy selection criteria.
• Targets capital expenditures toward areas most suited for economic development.
• Calls for coordination among economic development agencies and encourages
regional cooperation and interaction.
• Acknowledges the value of small business start-ups, expansions and spin-offs.
• Calls for the advanced identification of primary and secondary sites suited for
compatible industrial development.
• Reinforces the need for special development controls along US 158 and NC 168.
• Calls for community character districts in locations of significant historic
significances such as the old courthouse in Currituck and in Corolla Village.
• Prohibits littering of public roadsides, shorelines, and other properties.
• Supports and encourages historic preservation initiatives.
• Calls for an evaluation of the need for additional public safety substation in the
county.
SUBAREA CONCERNS: Mainland Area, Outer Banks, Knotts Island:

PUBLIC ACCESS: Do the access policies result in additional public access opportunities to
river, creek, sound, and beach areas? Will such access points be environmentally compatible
with their location?

Beneficial
• Calls for the provision of additional public access sites to ocean and estuarine waters
at a rate commensurate with the population growth rate.
• Calls for public access opportunities to include consideration for transportation
needs, including boat docks and ferry services.
• Calls for continued enforcement of the public nuisance ordinance requiring the
removal of buildings that, due to shoreline erosion, have become located in the public
trust area of the beach.
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
10-16
• Calls for better management of public access for vehicles driving on the beach. (The
potential additional restrictions on off-road driving are considered to be outweighed
by the improved enjoyment and safety for al those using the beach.)
• Calls for improvements to existing public access facilities on Knotts Island.

LAND USE COMPATIBILITY: Do the policies promote development patterns that protect
natural systems while protecting development from natural and man-made hazards? Do the
policies allow for economic development while providing clear direction for land use decision-
making?

Beneficial
• Calls for enhanced development standards for manufactured homes.
• Calls for better controls over very large single-family homes.

INFRASTRUCTURE AND CARRYING CAPACITY: Are the development patterns
encouraged by the policies consistent with location and capacity of water, sewer, roads, and
stormwater systems? Do they help prevent harm to AEC’s and fragile areas? Do the policies
support the desired pattern of growth?

Beneficial-Neutral
• Calls for implementation actions to protect the traffic moving function of the NC 168
and US 158 highway corridor.
• Supports the provision of adequate infrastructure and services on the Outer Banks,
but not so as to stimulate intensive development.
• Calls for controls over massive single-family structures so as not to overwhelm
available infrastructure on the outer Banks.
• Calls for no infrastructure services that would promote intensive development on
Knotts Island.
• Calls for the establishment of a stormwater management service district on Knotts
Island.

NATURAL HAZARD AREAS: Do the policies work to conserve barrier dunes, beaches,
floodplains, and other features that provide natural storm protection? Do the policies help
minimize threats to life, property and natural resources by appropriate design and locational
criteria?

Beneficial-Neutral
• Discourages the provision of growth-inducing facilities and services to the
particularly vulnerable off-road areas of the Outer Banks.

WATER QUALITY: Do the policies maintain, protect and, if possible, enhance water quality in
wetlands and bodies of water?

Neutral

LOCAL COUNTYWIDE CONCERNS: Do the policies maintain, protect and, if possible,
enhance water quality in wetlands and bodies of water?

Section 10: Relationship of Plan to Management Topics
10-17
Neutral-Beneficial
• Encourages commercial developments to cluster at appropriate locations according to
designated location criteria.
• Calls for a comprehensive assessment of community facility needs on Knotts Island,
including public safety services.

Section 11: Land Classification System
11-1
SECTION 11: LAND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
Purpose of Land Classification System
The CAMA Land Use Planning Guidelines require that local governments in the coastal area classify
various parts of their planning jurisdictions in accordance with the desired density, character of
development and level of services provided for each area. By delineating land classes on a map, the
County can specify where various forms of development and redevelopment might best occur, and where
natural and cultural resources should be conserved.

The Land Classification Map or Future Land Use Plan Map (See Appendix E for the Currituck County
Land Classification Map for this plan) is to be supported and complemented by zoning, subdivision
regulations, infrastructure investments and other local growth management tools; these local tools should
be consistent with the classification system as much as possible. Although general areas are outlined on
the Land Classification Map, it must be remembered that land classification is in and of itself a policy and
is not, in the strict sense of the term, a regulatory mechanism. Rather as with the balance of the Land Use
Plan should be used as a guide in adopting implementation ordinances and evaluating subdivision, land
development, and rezoning requests.
Proposed Land Classifications
Conservation Areas
The purpose of the Conservation class is to provide for the long-term management and protection of
significant, limited, or irreplaceable areas. Proper management is needed to conserve the natural, cultural,
recreational, scenic or biologically productive values of these areas. The Conservation class should be
applied to areas that should not be developed at all (preserved), or if developed, done so in a very limited
manner characterized by careful planning and cautious attention to the conservation of environmental
features. Infrastructure and services, public or private, should not be provided in these areas as a catalyst
that could stimulate development. The Conservation class includes:
1. Areas of Environmental Concern, as defined in 15A NCAC 7H (e.g. coastal wetlands, estuarine and
coastal shorelines, estuarine waters, public trust waters, etc.)
2. Freshwater wetland areas under the jurisdiction of the US Army Corps of Engineers' 404 Wetlands
Permit Program and as generally identified by the National Wetlands Inventory of the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service.
3. Certain critical wildlife habitat areas as may be designated by the State Natural Heritage Program and
approved by the County Commissioners for inclusion in this class. (e.g. Great Marsh on Knotts Island,
Currituck Banks/Swan Island Natural Area, Currituck Banks Corolla Natural Area, Pine
Island/Currituck Club Natural Area, Northwest River Marsh Game Land, and many other marsh areas
on the mainland.)
4. Other similar lands, environmentally significant because of their natural role in the integrity of the
coastal region and which include, but are not limited to: bottom land hardwoods, pocosins, and swamp
forests containing significant productive, natural, scenic, cultural or recreational resources, and as may
be approved by the County Commissioners for inclusion in this class.
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
11-2
Due to the low-lying nature of much of Currituck County, and the prevalence of wetlands in the
County, the Conservation class is the most extensive of the four land classes. Oftentimes, the
scattered, widespread nature of such areas (e.g. 404 wetlands) precludes their mapping except at a
very generalized level of detail. In such instances, the standards of the Conservation class shall be
applied in accordance with the site specific information made available during special studies
and/or the land development process.

As stated above, much of the land included in the Conservation classification is environmentally
sensitive and therefore already protected through existing, federal, state, and local regulations.
However, for areas within the classification that would be considered developable, uses such as
agriculture, agriculture related services, and extremely low density residential development (1
unit per 3 acres or less) would be permitted. With the exception of agricultural related uses,
nonresidential uses should not be encouraged. It is anticipated that any uses within the
Conservation area would be served by individual on-site water and wastewater.
Rural Areas (Areas Preferred for Open Space and Agricultural Preservation)
The Rural class is intended to provide for agriculture, forestry, and other allied uses traditionally
associated with a rural area. The Rural class is the broadest of the several general land classes and
thus constitutes the second largest land area on the Currituck County Land Classification Map.
Interior land areas including a significant amount of prime farmland, away from the ocean and
sound, and not assigned to the Conservation Class, have been designated Rural.

Preferred uses include very low-density dispersed development associated directly with farm
uses. Residential dwellings associated with farm activity typically employ on-site water supply
(e.g. individual wells) and waste disposal (i.e. septic systems). Areas meeting the intent of this
classification are appropriate for or presently used for agriculture, forestry, and other similar uses.
Agri-tourism related uses should also be considered appropriate.

Population densities are generally very low and development density is anticipated at no more
than 1 unit per 3 acres. In addition, any development in the Rural Areas would be served by
individual on-site water and septic.
Limited Service Areas* (Areas Preferred for Low Density Development)
The purpose of the Limited Services Area class is to provide for primarily residential
development at low densities. While low-density development may continue to locate in these
areas, it is recognized that soil limitations, flood prone areas, and a lack of infrastructure and
services may prevent these areas from ever reaching an urban level of development. Residences
in these areas usually employ wells and private septic tanks. Because many of the areas
identified for Limited Service also include prime farmland efforts should be made to ensure that
thriving agricultural operations are protected from encroaching development through the use of
buffering, landscaping, and conservation oriented design.

Despite the overall low density of these areas, efforts should be made to encourage clusters of
residential uses to preserve open space and to provide for a sense of a "community". Base
development density should be 1 unit per acre but could be increased to 1.5 units per acre through
overlay zoning depending upon whether service facilities are in place or planned and the potential
impact on the surrounding community. In the same instances where slightly higher density is
considered appropriate a moderate mix of housing types such as semi-detached would also be
considered reasonable.

Section 11: Land Classification System
11-3
With respect to nonresidential uses, it is essential that the existing community character be
preserved. Design criteria should be established to ensure that commercial development protects
and preserves the existing community in scale, architectural style, materials, landscaping, and site
design. In general, neighborhood commercial uses are more appropriate than large scale
commercial complexes. However, business designed to serve the tourist industry such as small
gift shops or agri-tourism related uses should not be prohibited provided the character and
intensity of the use is in keeping with the character of the surrounding area.

Very limited municipal-type services, such as fire protection, emergency services, and
community water, may be available; centralized sewage collection and treatment systems whether
public or community may be appropriate for these areas.
Full Service Areas* (Areas Preferred for Community Centers)
Areas designated as Full Service are those parts of the county where a broad range of
infrastructure and service investments have been provided or will be made available by the public
and/or private sectors. Infrastructure investments may include, for example, community level or
centralized water, parks, schools, fire and rescue facilities. Central wastewater treatment and
disposal whether public or community is considered reasonable in the Full Service Areas.

With respect to residential development, base development density is contemplated to be 2 units
per acre but could be increased to 3-4 units per acre through overlay zoning depending upon
services available and the potential impact on the surrounding area. A greater diversity in
housing types (i.e. semi-detached, attached, multi-family) would be considered appropriate in the
Full Service areas.

With respect to nonresidential uses, it is essential that the existing community character be
preserved. Design criteria should be established to ensure that commercial development protects
and preserves the existing community in scale, architectural style, materials, landscaping, and site
design. Nonresidential uses may include clusters of businesses serving the immediate area and,
where appropriate, a more extensive market territory.

Some of the areas identified for Full Service also include prime farmland. In an effort to protect
existing agricultural operations, efforts should be made to buffer them from encroaching
development through the use of landscaping and conservation oriented design.

*It is important to note that the intent of these last two land classes is not to blanket the entire
landscape with development, but rather to encourage new developments to occur in village like
patterns on pockets of land within these broader areas. Except in the totally residential Carova,
Aydlett, and Churches Island/Waterlily areas, these village-like areas may include retail services
of a scale compatible with their location and the immediately adjoining area. This will
discourage unnecessary increases in traffic volumes on the County’s few main roads by
encouraging residents to shop for their basic needs closer to home, even within walking or biking
distance when possible. At the same time, the use of clustered developments is intended to allow
for the allocation of permanent open space around and between such clusters. This development
pattern is entirely consistent with the desires of County residents to preserve open space while
allowing growth to occur in a managed way.

Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
11-4
Sub-Area Concerns and Policies

The text accompanying the Land Classification Map goes one step farther to describe the unique
character and policy emphasis assigned to various planning sub-areas of Currituck County.
Knotts Island, for example, has a very different development character than the Carova area.
These two areas call for different policy emphases, even though their overall land classification
(Limited Service Area) is the same. To treat each area the same from a policy standpoint would
eventually destroy those characteristics that make each part of Currituck County unique. For each
planning sub-area, a brief Summary Of Area Character is presented, followed immediately by a
statement of Policy Emphasis to be employed by the County in making development decisions for
that area.
Moyock Area
Summary of Area Character
The Moyock area is the fastest growing part of Currituck County. Development densities
currently range from 1 to 3 units per acre depending upon development type. It is coming under
increasing development pressure as a “bedroom community” for the Tidewater Area of Virginia.
This means that people moving into the Moyock area often work across the state line in Virginia
but prefer to have their residence in Currituck County. Heightened development interest in this
area has brought with it pressure for more subdivisions, as well as the retail services that follow
such development. It also brings with it concerns about heavier traffic, loss of open space,
increased stormwater runoff and drainage issues, overburdened schools, a need for enhanced
police, fire and rescue services, and demand for centralized water and sewer services.
Policy Emphasis:
The policy emphasis of this plan is on properly managing the increased urban level of growth that
this area is sure to experience over the next decade and beyond. Residential development
densities should be medium to high depending upon available services. In areas where on-site
wastewater is proposed and other County services are limited, development density should be
limited to 1-2 units per acre. However in areas where central sewer is proposed or existing,
additional services are available and the character of the surrounding areas supports it, higher
density ranging from 3-4 units per acre could be considered through the use of overlay zones.

Clustered housing developments, with open space required by ordinance, will need to be
encouraged. If sewage treatment collection systems are built, whether publicly or privately, all
such systems should be designed so as to allow them to be tied together into a single system at
some point in the future.

The proposed 168 Bypass will be needed to address the increased traffic loads passing into and
through this area. Protections should be put in place before the Bypass is built so as to conserve
the integrity and traffic moving function of this new roadway. Appropriate land use controls and
access management will be critical in protecting the public’s investment in the new roadway. A
selected right of way corridor that gives proper consideration to avoiding existing home sites will
be important. Traffic management on secondary and local roads will also need to receive
attention.

Given the existing development pattern and availability of services, much of the Moyock area is
planned as Full Service. However, it should be noted that all four (4) land use classifications are
Section 11: Land Classification System
11-5
included in Moyock and the surrounding area. There are existing environmentally sensitive areas
that cannot support higher density development and do not have access to services that are
therefore classified in either the Conservation or Rural Areas. In addition, it is not the County’s
intention to develop all of Moyock intensely but rather create specific service centers and to
provide a buffer of Limited Service Areas at lower density development between Full Service
Areas and those within the Rural and Conservation classifications.
Shawboro/Crawford
Summary of Area Character
The predominantly rural Shawboro/Crawford area contains some of the best, most extensive
agricultural lands in the county. Current development density is 1 unit per 3 acres. There are no
schools, parks or utilities serving this area and hence, no incentives for significant residential
development to locate here. At the same time, there is the potential for conflicting views among
landowners in the area. On one hand, there are the landowners who have profitable farm
operations and a strong desire to continue farming for as long as they, and perhaps their children
and grandchildren, are able to do so. These landowners are concerned about residential
subdivisions moving into the area, whose residents soon begin complaining about the dust, odors,
tractors on the road and other factors customarily associated with farming. On the other hand,
there are the landowners who may be struggling to keep their farm operations afloat, or who may
be reaching retirement age with no offspring interested in taking over the farm. These landowners
may have an interest in selling some or all of their land for development.
Policy Emphasis:
The policy emphasis of this plan is to encourage the preservation of agriculture and open space in
the Shawboro/Crawford area whenever possible. While this area will be impacted by the
proposed NC 168 Bypass, the overarching development policies of the area should hold. The
purpose of the proposed bypass is to move traffic through the County rather than create an
additional development center and therefore access should be limited. The County should study
the area more closely as it proceeds with an update to the Thoroughfare Plan.

Residential development, when approved, should bear some direct relationship to agricultural
activity so as to minimize land use conflicts between farm operations and nearby residents. When
residential development does occur, it should be strategically located to minimize conflicts.
Common sense examples include placing residential development: (1) upwind of prevailing
winds and open fields (2) behind or in and among wooded areas (3) clustered near existing non-
farm uses such as a church, general store or other residences. “Leapfrog” residential subdivisions,
unrelated to farm activities, and that would interrupt a large expanse of agriculture and open
space, should be strongly discouraged. Small businesses serving the needs of a rural area (general
store, farm supply, hardware, etc.) should be encouraged to locate at road intersections.
Residential development density equal to or less than one unit per three acres is to be encouraged
in the Shawboro/Crawford area and it has therefore been identified as a mix Conservation and
Rural Areas on the Future Land Use Map. Private access subdivisions, which allow up to five
one-acre lots to occur anywhere without review or input from the Planning Board or Farmland
Preservation Board, are to be especially discouraged here.
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
11-6
Courthouse Area
Summary of Area Character
For many years and continuing to this day, the Courthouse area of the mainland has been the
traditional governmental center of Currituck County. Development densities range from 1 to 2
units per acre. In addition to the old original courthouse, the area also contains the new Currituck
County Governmental Center, a fire/EMS station, an elementary school, other County offices,
and the mainland ferry landing. Several small businesses also operate within the area.
Significantly, this is one of the few areas of the mainland where reasonably high and dry
developable land fronts directly on the waters of the sound.
Policy Emphasis:
The policy emphasis of this plan is for the Courthouse area to continue to grow as a small
community center therefore much of the area is considered Full Service and Limited Service.
Given the existing cluster of services and local government functions here, and the sizable area of
developable land adjoining the sound, it is likely that the Courthouse area will continue to see
limited growth over the next decade. This growth is not apt to be as significant as in the Moyock
area, where substantial numbers of workers will work in Tidewater Virginia but choose to live in
Currituck County. Similarly, the completion of the proposed Mid-County Bridge will likely
spawn the construction of some residences for workers commuting to jobs on the Outer Banks,
but not to the same degree as in the Barco/Coinjock area. Even so, as Currituck County continues
to grow, new residences will move into the Courthouse area, and a commensurate number of new
businesses will likely follow.

Residential development densities should be medium to high depending upon available services.
In areas where on-site wastewater is proposed and other County services are limited, development
density should be limited to 1-2 units per acre. However in areas where central sewer is proposed
or existing, additional services are available and the character of the surrounding areas supports it,
higher density ranging from 3-4 units per acre could be considered through the use of overlay
zones. Regardless of the level of growth, care should be taken to encourage quality development
and the preservation of open space in conjunction with development approvals.
Barco/Coinjock/Airport Area
Summary of Area Character
While this area is, at present, quite sparsely developed (approximately 1 unit per acre), it has
many of the ingredients in place to become a significant community center for the mainland over
the next 10 to 15 years. Consider that the area envelops the strategically important intersection of
US 158 and NC 168. Upon completion of the proposed NC 168 by-pass (which will also feed into
US 158, farther to the west) this intersection will only grow in importance. This area also includes
an elementary school, a middle school and a high school, the airport, the landfill/transfer station,
the Sheriff’s office and jail, a County Park, a fire/EMS station, and a water treatment plant. A
number of small businesses are also located within the area. Compared to many areas of the
mainland, this area has a significant amount of land that is not in wetlands.
Policy Emphasis:
The policy emphasis of this plan is for the Barco/Coinjock/Airport area to emerge as the principal
community center serving the central area of the mainland and is therefore included as a Full
Service Area. In addition, once the proposed Mid-County Bridge is completed, it is quite likely
Section 11: Land Classification System
11-7
that this area will become a major new mainland service area for the Corolla and Carova areas of
Currituck County. This means that the area is apt to see a large number of residences built for
workers commuting to construction and service jobs on the Outer Banks. Further, as the area
comes into its own as a distinct community center, the reciprocal needs of homes and businesses
will feed off each other, adding even more growth to the area. As is the case with the Courthouse
area, care should be taken to encourage quality development and the preservation of open space
in conjunction with development approvals.

Residential development densities should be medium to high depending upon available services.
In areas where on-site wastewater is proposed and other County services are limited, development
density should be limited to 1-2 units per acre. However in areas where central sewer is proposed
or existing, additional services are available and the character of the surrounding areas supports it,
higher density ranging from 3-4 units per acre could be considered through the use of overlay
zones.
Intersection of Proposed Mid-County Bridge and US Highway 158
Summary of Area Character
The present location of the intersection of the proposed Mid-County Bridge and US Highway 158
is largely undeveloped. Current development density is approximately 1 unit per acre. Highway
158 at this location runs along a relatively narrow, north-south running ridge of higher ground. To
the east and west of this ridge are low-lying areas generally characterized as wetlands. Beyond
the wetlands to the east lies the small community of Aydlett, which has voiced concerns about the
potential impact of the new bridge on their community.
Policy Emphasis:
The policy emphasis of this plan is for there to be no access from the bridge road into the Aydlett
community, thereby protecting the community from unwanted commercial development. Rather,
commercial development spawned by the bridge should be clustered just off US 158 north and
south of the new intersection with the bridge road. Further, it is expected that wetlands will block
commercial development from occurring at locations removed from the US 158 corridor. For
these reasons the area is identified on the Future Land Use Map as Limited Service.

At the same time, care should be taken to adequately control the location and design of
commercial development so as not to compromise the traffic moving function of the new bridge
and roads leading to it. Community aesthetics and image associated with new development along
this major travel corridor should also receive strong consideration is setting standards for
development approval here. While currently limited to 1 housing unit per acre, residential
development densities in this area could be increased to 1.5 units per acre upon completion of the
proposed Mid-County Bridge and availability of services.
Aydlett and Waterlily/Churches Island
Summary of Area Character
The communities of Aydlett, Waterlily and Churches Island offer some of the most attractive
areas for development on the mainland of Currituck County. Situated atop an ancient, north-south
running ridge of relatively high and dry ground, these areas directly abut the western shoreline of
Currituck Sound, with very little intervening marsh. Home sites have panoramic views across the
sound to the Outer Banks. It is not surprising, then, that these areas are among the most attractive
for new residential development and redevelopment. In recent years, as the value of the land here
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
11-8
has dramatically increased, older smaller homes have begun to be replaced by much larger
structures. Existing zoning in these areas calls for 40,000 square foot lots or a density of 1 unit
per acre. There is little or no commercial development in these areas.
Policy Emphasis:
The policy emphasis of this plan is for developable areas of Aydlett, Waterlily and Churches
Island to remain as low-density residential areas at 1 unit per acre. The area is a mix of Limited
Service and Rural classifications on the Future Land Use Map. Generally, no centralized sewer
services should be provided to these areas that would induce more intensive development;
residences will continue to rely upon individual septic systems. While services that satisfy direct
public health, safety and general welfare needs, such as fire protection, law enforcement, and
emergency medical services are to be welcomed, no commercial development should be
permitted in these areas. Finally, as noted in the preceding discussion of the Mid-County Bridge,
there is to be no access from the bridge road into communities near the landfall for the bridge.
Grandy
Summary of Area Character
Grandy is the second fastest growth area in Currituck County, second only to the Moyock area.
Existing development density is approximately 1 to 2 units per acre with a fair amount of
nonresidential development as well. Despite a fairly lengthy commute to the Outer Banks
(compared to Point Harbor, for example), Grandy is nonetheless the home of many workers who
provide services to the predominantly residential areas of the Outer Banks. Grandy is also
emerging as a distinct service center in the southern part of mainland Currituck County, though
not to the same degree as the Point Harbor area. Housing in the Grandy area is still relatively
affordable, although escalating real estate prices throughout much of Currituck County threaten to
place homes even in this area out of the reach of some workers. In addition, the advent of the
proposed Mid-county Bridge will undoubtedly strengthen Grandy’s position as a service area for
the Outer Banks of Currituck County.
Policy Emphasis:
The policy emphasis of this plan is to allow Grandy to further evolve as a community center in its
own right and it is identified as a Full Service area on the Future Land Use Plan. Residential
development densities should be medium to high depending upon available services. In areas
where on-site wastewater is proposed and other County services are limited, development density
should be limited to 1-2 units per acre. However in areas where central sewer is proposed or
existing, additional services are available and the character of the surrounding areas supports it,
higher density ranging from 3-4 units per acre could be considered through the use of overlay
zones.

Clustered housing developments, with open space required by ordinance, is encouraged. If
sewage treatment collection systems are built, whether publicly or privately, all such systems
should be designed so as to allow them to be tied together into a single system at some point in
the future.

Given the existing development pattern and availability of services, much of the Grandy area is
planned as Full Service. However, it should be noted that three (3) of the land use classifications
are included in Grandy and the surrounding area. There are existing environmentally sensitive
areas that cannot support higher density development and are therefore classified as Conservation
Areas. In addition, it is not the County’s intention to develop all of Grandy intensely but rather
Section 11: Land Classification System
11-9
create specific service centers and to provide a buffer of Limited Service Areas at lower density
development between Full Service Areas and those within the Conservation classification.
Jarvisburg
Summary of Area Character
Despite its favorable location relative to the Outer Banks, the Jarvisburg area has thus far
remained largely rural in character with a development density of 1 unit per acre or less. Signs
are emerging, however, that may soon bring considerable change to the area’s heretofore bucolic
landscape. Like the Grandy area, the Jarvisburg area is coming under increasing pressure for
development. The same land characteristics that traditionally have made this area suitable for
farming (cleared, relatively level land with man-made drainage), also make the area quite
attractive for development. Currently, land speculation has become more commonplace in the
Jarvisburg area, as optioned properties (closing often contingent upon rezoning), offer current
owners purchase prices of three or four times their present value.
Policy Emphasis:
The policy emphasis of this plan is to allow the Jarvisburg area to accommodate quality
residential development at low densities while preserving the rural landscape between such
developments. Similar to the Grandy area, but at a lower overall density, new residential
development should be encouraged to locate in compact, village like clusters, preferably near
existing, non-agricultural activities and services. An example might be a new compact, walkable
neighborhood of homes built near an existing or proposed church, school or compatibly designed
general store. Residential development density can be higher than the truly expansive
Shawboro/Crawford rural area, but still much less that the densities to be found in Grandy to the
north or Point Harbor to the south. The area is encompassed by both the Conservation and
Limited Service classifications and an average density of 1 unit per acre is contemplated except
as provided for in the implementation action statement Action CW1.
Point Harbor
Summary of Area Character
Point Harbor has gradually been assuming the characteristics of a full service community with a
residential development density of approximately 1 unit per acre with a fair amount of
nonresidential development. In addition to a range of housing prices, Point Harbor is today
served by a variety of retail and other business establishments. As a result, residents of Point
Harbor need not travel great distances to find most of the every day needs. At the same time,
with convenience comes the potential for conflicts between land uses; the area must be watchful
not to allow poorly planned non-residential uses to adversely impact the character of the area and
the peace and quiet traditionally enjoyed by its residents.
Policy Emphasis:
The policy emphasis of this plan is to allow portions of the Point Harbor area to continue to
evolve as a full service community, but with better attention to the planning needed to protect
residential areas and the natural features that make the area so attractive. Policies and actions
contained in the land use plan should work to: (1) preserve and enhance the roadside appearance
of land uses along US 158, (2) place stricter controls over mining to assure that such operations
do not adversely impact nearby areas, (3) cluster retail and other service businesses in carefully
planned clusters, rather than encourage ordinary strip centers along the highway, (4) Require
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
11-10
vegetated buffers around non-residential uses to protect existing and planned neighborhoods (5)
Require vegetated buffers along shorelines to preserve public access and open space at the waters
edge and to protect water quality in the sound (6) and coordinate with NCDOT for the strategic
placement of traffic signals along US 158 in the Southern portion of the Mainland. Housing in
the Point Harbor area should continue to reflect a range of housing types and prices with
emphasis on single-family site-built homes.

The majority of the area is included in the Limited Service and Conservation classifications
which support densities ranging from 1 unit per 3 acres to 1 unit per acre. However, portions of
the area currently evolving as full service community centers have been identified for Full
Service contemplating development densities ranging from 1-1.5 units per acre where on-site
wastewater is proposed and other County services are limited. Where central sewer is proposed
or existing, additional services are available and the character of the surrounding areas supports it,
density may be increased to 3-4 units per acre through the use of overlay zones. As with the
Moyock and Grandy areas the Limited Service Area will act as a transition or buffer between the
Conservation and Full Service Areas.
Corolla
Summary of Area Character
The Corolla area is 85 to 90 percent developed. There is little reason to believe that most of
Corolla’s growth is behind it, however. On the contrary, the future of this area will be determined
less by new development on vacant lots and more by second and third generation redevelopment
of lots already built upon. As the value of barrier island property has continued to escalate, the
economic incentive for redevelopment of existing properties has heightened dramatically. In other
words, the value of the land can justify a much greater investment in the structure placed upon it.
This means that older era beach cottages can be torn down and replaced by much larger and more
massive residential structures. It also means that, as this phenomenon takes effect, the Corolla
area will witness increases in impervious surface areas, greater demand for drinking water and
wastewater treatment capacities, the need for more parking, greater traffic generation, and the
need for greater fire flows to handle much larger, bulkier structures.
Policy Emphasis:
The policy emphasis of this plan is to allow for predominantly medium density residential
development (2 to 3 units per acre) with minimal commercial development arranged in clusters.
An overall density of no more than 3 units per acre should also apply to PUDs, the prevailing
development form in the Corolla area. PUDs should also have a mandated 30% permanent open
space requirement. Strip commercial development is to be avoided for both aesthetic as well as
traffic moving considerations. Development and redevelopment should be capable of being
supported by the area’s infrastructure and services—particularly drinking water, sewage
treatment, road capacity, parking areas, and required fire suppression capabilities. Development
standards should recognize that massive residential structures, whether built as a “single family”
structure or partitioned into multi-family condominiums, can be equally intense in terms of the
number of occupants, number of cars, water consumed, traffic generated, etc. Reasonable
development/redevelopment limits should be set which balance the property rights of the
individual against legitimate concerns about public health and safety.
Section 11: Land Classification System
11-11
Carova
Summary of Area Character
The Carova area is also called the “Off-Road” or “4 Wheel Drive” area of Currituck County.
While current regulations require minimum lot sizes of 120,000 square feet (equivalent to about 1
unit per 3 acres), there are many pre-existing vacant lots, platted under the County’s previous
land use standards at 15,000 square feet per lot (equivalent to about 3 units per acre). This area
has also been designated by the Federal government as a COBRA (Coastal Barriers Resource
Act) area, meaning that no structure in this area is eligible for Federal flood insurance and no
Federal money may be spent in this area that would stimulate development.
Policy Emphasis:
The policy emphasis of this plan is to allow for very low to medium density residential
development (see above) without infrastructure or service investments that could stimulate
growth and development. In terms of infrastructure, this means that no centralized water and
sewer services, public or private, will be approved and no hard surface roads will be allowed.
Further, only services that protect the health, safety, and welfare (i.e. law enforcement, fire and
rescue.) will be authorized. Commercial and other convenience services shall not be allowed.
Knotts Island and Gibbs Woods
Summary of Area Character
Knotts Island and Gibbs Woods have several characteristics in common, and are therefore treated
jointly here. First, both areas possess geographic positions and overland transportation linkages
that tie them as much to Tidewater Virginia as to Currituck County. Second, they are very much
residential in character, with vast areas of open space, influenced in large measure, by extensive
wetlands. The existing development density is 1 unit per 3 acres. The two areas have few
services, in terms of both business and infrastructure, and the residents have expressed no strong
desire to change that. In fact, there is an apparent consensus among many residents of Knotts
Island and Gibbs Woods that no services or infrastructure should be provided to these two areas
(chiefly centralized water and sewer) that would encourage higher density development.
Policy Emphasis:
The policy emphasis of this plan is for developable areas of Knotts Island and Gibbs Woods to
remain as low to very low density residential areas. This means predominantly 1 unit per 3 acres.
In keeping with the wishes of the majority of residents in these two areas, no services or
infrastructure should be provided that would serve as an inducement to more intensive
development. This means that residences will continue to rely upon individual wells and septic
systems for their water supply and sewage treatment needs. Services that satisfy direct public
health, safety and general welfare needs, such as fire protection, law enforcement, and emergency
medical services should, however, be periodically evaluated and improved as necessary.
Analysis of Future Land Use Map
The planning guidelines require an analysis of the amount of land allocated to each of the land
classes shown on the Land Classification Map and a comparison with the land needs analysis of
Section 4, Future Land Use Needs. The table below details this analysis.

Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
11-12
Table 11.1 Comparison of Land Allocated to Future Land Use and Projected Land
Needs, 2025
Land Use Class Total Acres
Allocated to
Each Land
Class
(a)
% of Each
Land Class in
Development
(b)
Total Acreage
Available for
Development
as Projected
(a) x (b)
Total
Acreage
Projected for
Development
Full Service Areas 17,711 80% 14,169
Limited Service
Areas
26,568 65% 17,269
Rural Areas 40,218 10% 4,021
Conservation Areas 81,223 2% 1,624
Totals 165,720 -- 37,083 37,183
Amended 08-18-2008 (PB 08-22)

The total acreage projected for development (37,183) comes from Section 4 of this plan,
Projected Land Use In Development, 2025. The table acknowledges that some 10% of Rural
Areas will go into development as certain farmers will wish to sell out and close down their farm
operations. Full Service Areas have the highest percentage of their land in development due to
the availability of sewer service to many of these areas by the year 2025. Limited Service Areas
have a lower percentage of their acreage in development due to their dependency on septic tanks
and variable soil conditions found here. Conservation Areas include some development, to
acknowledge that some limited acreage within this broad classification will likely be acceptable
for development (i.e. the wetland map may be wrong in some instances, or simply not detailed
enough). Total Acreage Available for Development as Projected includes acreages that will be
set aside as permanently dedicated open space during the development process. These areas are
considered part of the development and therefore included as developed acreage for this analysis.

As stated above, not all of the acreage dedicated to the four (4) land use classifications is
anticipated to fully develop within the planning horizon. The Plan is intended to be a generalized
guide showing areas targeted for development. The designation of Limited Service and Full
Service areas is conservative and intended to direct the most intense development in areas where
public services exist or are planned. Given the anticipated development rate, the amount of land
allocated for development on the Future Land Use Map comports with the acreage needed for
future development (Section 4).
Section 11: Land Classification System
11-13
Table 11.2 Distribution of Acreages between the Classifications and Land Use Designations

Existing Land Use Classifications
(Additional Land Area Needed for Development from Table
4.10)

Residential
15,248 A
Commercial
2,005 A
Industrial
701 A
Other
(including
undeveloped)
147,476
Total
Acreage
165,730
Future Land
Use
Designations
(2006 LUP)

Full Service
17,711 A
(11%)

80% in
Development
14,169A

6,100 A

1,000 A 400 A 10,113 17,711
Limited
Service
26,568 A
(16%)
65% in
Development
17,269A

4,748 A 884 A 301 A 20,711 26,568
Rural
40,218 A
(24%)
10% in
Development
4,021 A

3,000 A 121 A 37,097 40,218
Conservation
81,223 A
(49%)
2% in
Development
1,624A

1,400 A 79,855 81,223
Total Acreage
165,720

Total Acreage in
Development
37,083
15,248 2,005 701 147,776 165,720

As stated above, the County does not expect the areas designated for development will
build out within the planning period. A percentage is estimated for each of the
categories. Full Service Areas will likely see the majority of development and therefore a
build out of 80 percent is estimated. Limited Service Areas are likely to also experience
a significant demand for development and therefore a 65 percent development rate is
anticipated. Development of Rural Areas is already constricted by existing regulations
and a development rate of 10 percent is anticipated. Conservation Areas are severely
limited by sensitive environmental features and therefore only 2 percent of the land area
is anticipated to develop within the planning horizon.

As illustrated by the table above, it is anticipated that the majority of the development in
the County within all four (4) future land use designations will be residential in nature.
Commercial development is likely to take place in the Full Service and Limited Service
Areas with limited demand for agriculturally based services in the Rural Area. Similarly,
industrial uses will likely be directed toward the Full Service and Limited Service Areas.
The balance of the land in the County is likely to remain undeveloped during the
planning horizon.
Section 12: Tools for Managing Development
12-1
SECTION 12: TOOLS FOR MANAGING DEVELOPMENT
Introduction
This section of the plan describes the relationship between Currituck County's existing
development management structure and its official Land Use and Development Policies. It
concludes by describing several recommended changes in that existing structure to further the
goals and policies of the new Land Use Plan. The section includes three parts:

1. Description of the role of the plan and the status of its policies as applied by various users
involved in the County's land use and development decisions.
2. Description of the County's existing development management program, including
ordinances and plans, and how these ordinances and plans are used to implement the
County’s growth management objectives.
3. Identification of additional tools that will be used to implement the plan.

Immediately following this section is Section 13: Action Plan and Schedule, which enumerates
the many implementation strategies that are recommended for consideration in carrying out the
policies.
Role and Status of Plan/Primary Users of the Plan
The Currituck County CAMA Land Use Plan will serve both day-to-day and long-range
functions. The day-to-day functions relate primarily to the County’s administrative staff on
preparation and administration of development management ordinances and the public's
understanding and use of these ordinances for land use and development decisions regarding their
own property. Other users of the Plan include the following:
Board of County Commissioners
For the Board of Commissioners, the Plan will be a policy and decision guide on matters related
to land use and land development. It will not have the status of a local ordinance or code, except
in matters related to development or land use within Areas of Environmental Concern, but the
policies and the land classification map will guide decisions on applicable ordinances and policies
such as the zoning ordinance and subdivision regulations. The plan will also be used in the Board
of Commissioners' decision-making on the capital and annual operating budgets. The Board will
review the implementation plan periodically and make necessary adjustments based on budgetary
considerations, coordination with other projects, and community needs.
County Planning Board
The Planning Board will use the plan and its policies to determine consistency of project plans
and development proposals with County goals in making decisions to grant or deny requests, such
as a zoning change or subdivision plat, or to approve project plans.
Property Owners and Developers
Plan will provide guidance on the types of land uses and development that are desired by the
county. The policies will help owners or developers formulate proposals that are consistent with
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
12-2
the goals and objectives of the community, thereby increasing the likelihood of approval. In
addition, the plan points to basic sources of information that will help owners and developers
understand the capabilities and limitations of their property.
County Residents, Generally
The plan will provide information that will allow residents and property owners to better
understand plans for public projects or private development and will provide a reference when
supporting or opposing such proposals.
County Administrative Staff
The staff of the County will use the plan as a tool for evaluating development proposals and for
preparing plans for public facilities. Staff will also check existing ordinances for consistency with
the plan and recommend any necessary adjustments to the Planning Board and Board of
Commissioners. Staff will also use the plan and implementation strategy when preparing its
budget recommendations and will make reference to the plan when preparing applications for
grants and other assistance.
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management/Other State and Federal
Agencies
The Division of Coastal Management will use the Plan for consistency determinations on major
development permits and by other state and federal agencies on the consistency of their projects
and programs with local plans and policies.
Existing Development Management Program
Currituck County’s existing development management program continues to provide a
comprehensive and consistent approach in implementing the policies identified in the 1990 Land
Use Plan. Currently, the program includes the following ordinances, plans and programs:
Existing Ordinances and Plans
Unified Development Ordinance, which includes the following:
• Subdivision Regulations-sets standards for subdividing raw land into smaller parcels for
purchase and building.
• Countywide Zoning-determines the most appropriate use of a given parcel of land, based
on many natural and man-made factors.
• Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance-requires that new development must not
overburden the ability of existing public facilities to support it.
• Flood Damage and Prevention Program-sets standards for development to prevent the
loss of life and property due to flooding

NFIP Community Rating System Plan
Use objective criteria established by the National Flood Insurance Program to gauge the
effectiveness of a particular local government’s polices and standards in preventing flood
damage. Affects flood insurance rates paid by property owners in the area.

Hazard Mitigation Plan
Sets forth advanced planning to mitigate damage from hazardous events.

US 158/NC 168 Highway Corridor Plan
Section 12: Tools for Managing Development
12-3
Identifies specific standards for protecting both the traffic moving function as well as the general
appearance of this important highway corridor

NCDOT 1988 Thoroughfare Plan
The official transportation plan for Currituck County, prepared as a cooperative effort of the State
Department of Transportation and local officials.

Maple Airport Master Plan
The official long range plan of improvements for this County-owned facility
Review Boards/Committees
In addition to the Board of County Commissioners:

Currituck County Farmland Preservation Board
Advises the County on measures and decisions to preserve and protect important farmland
resources in Currituck County

Technical Review Committee
County Committee charged with responsibility for technical review of development proposals,
including issues of drainage, public safety, service delivery, roads, etc.

DCM Local Permit Officer (LPO) Program
Local permit officer, operating under the auspices of the North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management, charged with responsibility for administering the minor CAMA permit program.
Other Growth Management Tools in Place
State Building Code
Beyond the primary management programs listed above, the County also enforces the State
Building Code in all areas of Currituck County. Currently, the Mainland office is staffed with five
building inspectors, three permit officers, five planners and one code enforcement officer. In
1992, a new Building Inspections Department was established on the beach in Corolla due to the
increase in building permit activity. This office is staffed with two building inspectors, two permit
officers and one planner.

Stormwater Management
The Currituck County Soil Conservation Service is responsible for administrating the
locally adopted stormwater management program, which addresses both the quality and
quantity of stormwater runoff. These standards exceed the State Division of Water
Quality standards and are enforced at the local level.

These development regulations and staffing levels have helped insure a comprehensive
and coordinated approach in managing development throughout the county
New Growth Management Tools Recommended
As shown in Section 13 Action Plan and Schedule that immediately follows this section,
this plan recommends that a wide range of implementation actions be explored to carry
out the goals and policies contained in the Land Use Plan. For a complete listing of the
various actions, as well as an assessment of their priority and anticipated timeframe for
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
12-4
completion, the reader is directed to the Action Plan. Some of the more significant new
studies, plans, and ordinance amendments recommended in the plan are shown below by
general subject area:
Public Access, Parks and Open Space
• A new plan for public access to the ocean and sound, including opportunity sites
for regional, local and neighborhood access facilities.
• A master parks and recreation plan to identify park and recreation needs, suggest
park and recreation additions and improvements, set forth cost estimates, and
propose the means of financing.
• A developer fee in lieu of land dedication for park and recreation facilities,
including funding for the acquisition and improvement of public access facilities
to the sound and ocean.
• A program allowing for the purchase or transfer of development rights as a means
of promoting open space preservation in Currituck County, particularly in
designated areas of the Mainland.
Development Controls/Standards
• A new multi-family zoning district or overlay, to be applied only in locations
served by centralized water and sewer, adequate road infrastructure and
convenient to services.
• Amendment to the UDO to require a minimum of one (1) foot of “freeboard”
above the minimum NFIP base flood elevations as shown on the most recent
Flood Insurance Rate Maps.
Community Appearance
• A special highway corridor overlay district for the US 158/ NC 168 highway
corridor. The overlay district would include standards for façade materials (i.e. no
metal buildings) signage, landscaping, parking lot connections and other factors to
help preserve the appearance and function of this critical transportation artery.
• New local nuisance law standards concerning the proper removal and disposal of
old manufactured housing units prior to the issuance of a permit for the placement
or construction of a new residence or other structure on the same site.
Development Impacts
• A Task Force to look at the broad implications of a mid county bridge and its
potential impacts, such as growth in the RO2 COBRA zone, beach access and
other infrastructure needs of increased numbers of day visitors, changes in county
services such as law enforcement, economic impacts on the Mainland and the
Outer Banks, etc.
• Amendment to the Currituck County UDO to address the real impacts of large
“single family” homes. Employ lot coverage, floor area ratios, house massing, fire
suppression issues, number of bedrooms and baths, and other factors to properly
control the location, construction and use of these structures.
Section 12: Tools for Managing Development
12-5
Housing Needs
• New requirements for businesses on the Outer Banks to provide compatibly
designed affordable housing for their employees in suitable quarters built above
or attached to the place of business.
• A new multi-family zoning district or overlay, to be applied only in locations
served by centralized water and sewer, adequate road infrastructure and
convenient to services.
County Finances
• New financial tools for recovering infrastructure and service costs related to new
growth and development. (e.g. impact fees, land transfer tax, upzoning fee, user
fees, etc.)
• A “School Impact Fee” to address the capital cost associated with school
construction.
Environmental Quality
• A countywide storm water management plan, including sub-area district plans to
address problems in particular watersheds or sub-area drainage basins of the
county.
• An examination of existing zoning districts and permitted land uses to eliminate
potential threats to environmentally sensitive areas.

The reader is also directed to Section 10 of this plan, where a detailed assessment of the
various strategies recommended in the plan are analyzed in depth as to their likely impact
on each of the policy areas required by CAMA.

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
Section 13: Action Plan and Schedule
13-1
SECTION 13: ACTION PLAN AND SCHEDULE
Introduction
This section of the land use plan sets forth implementation actions to carry out the policies. While
the plan may list several dozen actions, it is important to note that only a portion of these actions
are likely to be implemented in the five-year period between land use plan updates.
Implementation actions are not mandatory items but, rather, are intended to suggest a number of
options available to the County. While the policies of the plan should remain relatively
unchanged over time, implementation actions should be revisited annually and updated. With
each annual review, the list of actions should change as new opportunities and needs arise.

1. Actions Concerning Public Access Policy
Foundation
Priority Time Who Leads
Action PA-1: Develop a plan for public access to
the ocean and sound, including opportunity sites
for regional, local and neighborhood access
facilities.
PA1, PA2,
PA3, PA4,
PA8, PA10
Priority 4 to 6
years
County
Commissioners,
County Planning
Board
Action PA-2: Establish a developer fee in lieu of
land dedication for park and recreation facilities,
including funding for the acquisition and
improvement of public access facilities to the
sound and ocean.
PA1, PA2 Priority 4 to 6
years
County Manager
Action PA-3: Amend the Currituck County
Unified Development Ordinance to provide
incentives to development proposals that reserve a
strip of land for public access along the water’s
edge.
PA1, PA2 Priority 4 to 6
years
County
Commissioners,
County Planning
Board
Action PA-4: Establish financial mechanisms by
which non- resident visitors to the County might
fund their fair share of the cost of acquiring and
improving public access facilities to the sound and
ocean.
PA1, PA2 Low
priority
Greater
than 6
years
County Manager
Action PA-5: Open water marinas often “consume”
large areas of public trust surface waters and can
interfere with the rights of navigation for small
sailing vessels and other water users. Amend the
Currituck County Unified Development Ordinance
to provide incentives for constructing
non-wetland, upland marinas as opposed to open
water marinas.
PA6 Low
priority
Greater
than 6
years
County
Commissioners,
County Planning
Board
Action PA-6: The County shall continue to require
major residential subdivisions that abut public
trust waters to provide public access to those
waters. Access for the general public is preferred.
PA1, PA2,
PA9, PA10
High
priority
On-
Going
County
Commissioners,
County Planning
Board
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
13-2
Action PA-7: The County shall actively pursue the
elimination/removal of any structure that, due
to erosion and subsequent damage, interferes with
access to and movement on the public trust
beaches of Currituck County.
PA9, PA10 High
priority
1 to 3
years
County
Commissioners
2. Actions Concerning Environmentally
Sensitive Areas
Policy
Foundation
Priority Time Who Leads
Action ES-1: Conduct an examination of
existing zoning districts and permitted land uses
to eliminate potential threats to environmentally
sensitive areas.
ES 1, ES3,
ES5, ES8
Priority 4 to 6
years
County Planning
Board
Action ES-2: Currituck County will continue to
support CAMA requirements concerning the
preservation of open space buffers along
estuarine shorelines. Further, consider adopting
buffering standards greater than those required by
CAMA.
ES4 Priori
ty
4 to
6
years
County
Planning
Board
Action ES-3: Explore the development of a
wetlands mitigation bank, whether public or
private, for the purpose of allowing desirable
economic development to take place while
conserving the total inventory of wetlands in
Currituck County.
ES1, ES2,
ES3
Low
priority
Greater
than 6
years
County
Commissioners,
Planning Board
and USACE
Action ES-4: The County shall consider amending
the UDO to provide a higher level of protection
for maritime forests and significant natural
sand dunes as these features form the image of
Currituck Outer Banks Beaches.
ES7 Low
priority
Greater
than 6
years
County
Commissioners,
Planning Board
Action ES-5: The County shall not support actions
to commercialize the public beach rather
permitting only clustered commercial
development in Corolla and prohibiting
commercial development in the four wheel drive
area.
OB1,
OB2,OB5
Low
priority
Greater
than 6
years
County
Commissioners,
Planning Board
3. Actions Concerning Agricultural and Rural
Area Preservation
Policy
Foundation
Priority Time Who Leads
Action AG-1: Have the Currituck County
Planning Department, in its review of
development proposals, refer to Soil Conservation
Service mapping of prime agricultural soils in
making determinations as to highly productive
farmland.
AG1, AG2 Priority 4 to 6
years
Farmland
Preservation
Board,
County Planning
Department
Section 13: Action Plan and Schedule
13-3
Action AG-2: Involve the Farmland Preservation
Board in the review of sketch plans for major
residential subdivisions for the purpose of
preserving prime agricultural land.
AG1, AG2 Priority 4 to 6
years
Farmland
Preservation
Board,
County Planning
Department
Action AG-3: Amend the Currituck County
Unified Development Ordinance to allow open
space, dedicated as part of a development
proposal or set aside in a conservation
easement, to be transferred and used for
economic activity (e.g. compatible timber
management or farming), so long as the restriction
or easement preventing future development
remains permanent, properly monitored, and
lawfully recorded.
AG1, AG2 High
priority
1 to 3
years
County Planning
Board,
County
Commissioners
Action AG-4: The County, in cooperation with the
Farmland Preservation Board, shall explore the
merits of and opportunities for implementing
voluntary mechanisms for property owners to
preserve their farmland. Included among such
mechanisms shall be a program for the transfer of
development rights.
AG1, AG2,
AG5
Priority 4 to 6
years
County
Commissioners,
Farmland Pres
Board
4. Actions Concerning Housing and
Neighborhood Development
Policy
Foundation
Priority Time Who Leads
Action HN-1: Continue the initiative to amend the
Currituck County Unified Development Ordinance
to create a new multi-family zoning district or
overlay, to be applied only in locations served by
centralized water and sewer, adequate road
infrastructure and convenient to services.
HN1, HN3,
HN5,
High
priority
1 to 3
years
County Planning
Board
Action HN-2: The County recognizes that, as the
baby boom generation ages into retirement, there
will be growing demand for accessory housing
that offers independence for senior citizens
while still providing a measure of supervision and
security. Therefore, amend the Unified
Development Ordinance to allow, in specified
locations, separate living quarters accessory to a
principal residential structure. (To be allowed only
in designated zoning districts and locations, after
public input, and as may be consistent with the
County’s Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance.)

HN5, HN6 Low
priority
Greater
than 6
years
County Planning
Board
Action HN-3: Explore possible requirements for a
certain percentage of compatibly designed
affordable homes to be set aside within major
new subdivisions on the Mainland.
HN5 Low
priority
Greater
than 6
years
County Planning
Board
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
13-4
Action HN-4: To curtail the rental abuses
associated with large numbers of peak season
employees piling into single family homes, and to
reduce unnecessary traffic congestion on NC 12,
explore requirements for businesses on the Outer
Banks to provide compatibly designed
affordable housing for their employees in
suitable quarters built above or attached to the
place of business.
HN5 Priority 4 to 6
years
County Planning
Board
Action HN-5: Establish local nuisance law
standards concerning the proper removal and
disposal of old manufactured housing units
prior to the issuance of a permit for the placement
or construction of a new residence or other
structure on the same site.
HN10 Priority 4 to 6
years
County
Commissioners
5. Actions Concerning Commercial
Development
Policy
Foundation
Priority Time Who Leads
Action CD-1: In evaluating rezoning requests for
commercial development, employ policies that:
• Encourage the clustering, rather than
stripping, of commercial uses
• Encourage commercial uses at
intersections, rather than in strips
• Do not create spot zoning situations
CD1, CD2,
CD3, CD4
Low
priority
Greater
than 6
years
County Planning
Department
Action CD-2: Amend the Currituck County
Unified Development Ordinance to establish
regulatory standards for:
• Low profile pole mounted signs,
monument style signs and appropriate
lighting.
• Connections between adjoining parking
lots
• Improved landscaping requirements
• Prohibitions against pre-fab and metal
building facades
CD7, CD8,
CD9
Priority 4 to 6
years
County Planning
Board
Action CD-3: Consider amending the UDO to
prevent any PUD from redesignating open space
or residential areas to any commercial district
after initial sketch plan approval.
CD5 Priority 4 to 6
years
County Planning
Board
Section 13: Action Plan and Schedule
13-5
6. Actions Concerning Industrial
Development
Policy
Foundation
Priority Time Who Leads
Action ID-1: Amend the Currituck County
Unified Development Ordinance to establish
regulatory standards for certain aspects of mining
operations, sludge disposal sites and similar
activities not adequately addressed by state laws.
(e.g. truck traffic, noise levels, exterior lighting
levels, hours of operation, visual impacts, water
management reclamation and reuse following
closure of the site, etc.)
ID4, ID8 Low
priority
Greater
than 6
years
County Planning
Board
Action ID-2: Currently, mining operations (e.g.
borrow pits, one acre or less) are permitted by right
in all zoning districts in the County. To provide
for an improved measure of control over these
operations, amend the Currituck County Unified
Development Ordinance to limit minor mining
operations and other similar activities to the
agricultural district by right, and in other districts
only by special use permit.
ID4, ID8 Priority 4 to 6
years
County
Planning Board
Action ID-3: Amend the Currituck County
Unified Development Ordinance to require
warehousing, storage and distribution facilities to
provide a vegetated buffer strip along property
boundaries facing a major public road or
residential development.
ID5 High
priority
1 to 3
years
County Planning
Board
7. Actions Concerning Transportation Policy
Foundation
Priority Time Who Leads
Action TR-1: The County shall continue to be an
active participant in lobbying efforts for planned
roadway improvements to US 158, NC 168, NC 34,
and NC12.
TR1, TR3,
TR4, TR10,
TR15
High
priority
On
Going
County
Commissioners
Action TR-2: Conduct a community involvement
based process to evaluate proposals for improved
access to and movement up and down the
Currituck Outer Banks. Identify the pros and cons
of the proposed mid-county bridge, improvements
to NC 12, enhanced ferry service, or a combination
of all three.

TR1, TR4,
TR5, TR13,
TR14
High
priority
On
Going
County
Commissioners
Action TR-3: Establish a Task Force to look at the
broad implications of a mid county bridge and its
potential impacts, such as growth in the RO2
COBRA zone, beach access and other
infrastructure needs of increased numbers of day
visitors, changes in county services such as law
enforcement, economic impacts on the Mainland
and the Outer Banks, etc. The findings of such a
task force should be made available well in
advance of the construction of the bridge.
TR13, TR14 Priority 4 to 6
years
County
Commissioners
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
13-6
Action TR-4: Continue enforcing restrictions on
curb cuts and driveway access to major state-
maintained roads including, specifically, US 158,
NC 168, NC 34 and NC 12.
TR2, TR3,
TR4, TR5,
TR6
High
priority
On-
Going
County
Planning Board
Action TR-5: Amend the Currituck County
Unified Development Ordinance to establish a
special highway corridor overlay district for
the US 158/ NC 168 highway corridor. The
overlay district would include standards for
façade materials (i.e. no metal buildings) signage,
landscaping, parking lot connections and other
factors to help preserve the appearance and
function of this critical transportation artery.
TR4, TR5,
TR6, TR14
High
priority
1 to 3
years
County
Planning Board
Action TR-6: Revisit the 1994 US Highway 158
and NC Highway 168 Corridor Plan to
determine those appearance and functional
recommendations that remain appropriate for
implementation (e.g. landscaping, signage,
driveway cuts, lighting, etc.).

TR4, TR5,
TR6, TR14
High
priority
1 to 3
years
County Planning
Board
Action TR-7: Adopt the Draft NCDOT
Thoroughfare Plan (1999) or an updated version
of the Plan.
TR2, TR3,
TR4, TR10,
TR13, TR15
High
priority
1 to 3
years
County
Commissioners,
NCDOT
Action TR-8: The County shall continue to
encourage street connectivity between similar
land uses.
TR7, TR8 High
priority
On-
Going
County Planning
Board
Action TR-9: The County shall actively pursue
grants and exactions for the installation of bike
paths, sidewalks and multi-use paths once a
plan for these improvements has been adopted.
TR9, TR10 Priority 4 to 6
years
County
Commissioners,
NCDOT
8. Actions Concerning Water and Sewer
Service
Policy
Foundation
Priority Time Who Leads
Action WS-1: Continue with on-going study to
determine if Currituck County can become more
independent from outside sources of potable
water (i.e. Camden County) by creating sufficient
water treatment capacity and obtaining the
necessary discharge permits for disposing of
brine.
WS1 High
priority
On-
Going
County
Commissioners
Action WS-2: Establish an education program for
the proper maintenance of septic tanks. Include
a financial incentive, whereby the County
arranges for a discounted pump-out service for
septic tank owners who participate.
WS6 Low
priority
Greater
than 6
years
County
Commissioners
Section 13: Action Plan and Schedule
13-7
Action WS-3: Amend the Currituck County
Unified Development Ordinance to require that
package sewage treatment plants to be located
and designed so as not to adversely impact
nearby existing and proposed developments.
Encourage such facilities to be located away
from water bodies and exterior property lines if
possible.
WS7, WS8 Low
priority
Greater
than 6
years
County
Planning Board
Action WS-4: Prohibit any new wastewater
treatment plant from locating in any Area of
Environmental Concern (AEC) as designated by
CAMA.
WS3, WS5,
WS8
High
priority
1 to 3
years
County Planning
Board
Action WS-6: The County shall scrutinize the use
and reliability of engineered septic systems (e.g.
peat systems) in locations that would otherwise
not be suitable for conventional septic systems.
The County shall report its findings to the State.
ES1, HN1,
WS6, WS7 ,
WQ1
Priority 4 to 6
years
County Planning
Department
9. Actions Concerning School Facilities Policy
Foundation
Priority Time Who Leads
Action SF-1: Form an interdepartmental project
team whose purpose is to fully implement County
objectives for growth management and
adequate public facilities as applicable to
schools and parks. Bring together top school
administrators, planning department personnel,
and the parks department, among others, to
prepare a plan of action for review by the School
Board and County Commissioners.
SF1 Priority 4 to 6
years
County
Commissioners,
County School
Board
Action SF-2: Continue to pursue a “School
Impact Fee” to address the capital cost associated
with school construction.
SF1 High
priority
On-
Going
County
Commissioners,
County School
Board
10. Actions Concerning Parks and Recreation Policy
Foundation
Priority Time Who Leads
Action PR-1: Commission a master parks and
recreation plan to identify park and recreation
needs, suggest park and recreation additions and
improvements, set forth cost estimates, and
propose the means of financing.
PR1, PR2,
PR5
Priority
4 to 6
years
County
Commissioners,
Parks
Department
Action PR-2: Set forth, as a goal for the County,
the establishment of a system of district parks,
serving districts as identified in the master parks
and recreation plan.
PR1 Low
priority
Greater
than 6
years
County
Commissioners,
Parks
Department
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
13-8
Action PR-3: Implement a fee in lieu of land
dedication, to be applied to new developments,
for the purpose of generating revenues for the
development of park assets and additional public
access opportunities in Currituck County.
Consider placing such revenues in reserve
accounts, tied to the designated districts within
which the fees were generated.
PR6, PR1,
PR5
Priority 4 to 6
years
County
Commissioners,
Parks
Department,
Planning Board
Action PR-4: Form an interdepartmental project
team whose mission is to orchestrate the full
utilization of (1) the County’s school properties
for recreational use when not being employed for
school purposes and (2) the County’s park and
recreation assets for school use. Bring together
school facility managers and parks department
personnel, among others, to prepare a plan of
action for review by the School Board and County
Commissioners.
PR3 Low
priority
Greater
than 6
years
County
Commissioners,
County School
Board
11. Actions Concerning Solid Waste
Management
Policy
Foundation
Priority Time Who Leads
Action SW-1: Continue to monitor the flow of
waste into the County’s transfer station and
landfill. Periodically adjust the rates that the
County charges to accept solid waste, including
dumping fees for construction and demolition
(C&D) materials. Ensure that the County’s rates
are on a par with other rates in the region.
SW1, SW6 High
Priority
On-
Going
County
Commissioners
Action SW-2: Pursue the development of a solid
waste management program where recyclable
materials are, in fact, recycled.
SW2, SW3,
SW4, SW7
Low
priority
Greater
than 6
years
County
Commissioners
Action SW-3: Require waste management
companies operating in Currituck County to
accept gasoline.
SW2, SW4 Priority 4 to 6
years
County
Commissioners
Action SW-4: Implement a program to encourage
property managers of rental houses to educate
renters of their responsibilities (e.g. not parking
in street, keeping trash off the beach, having an
adequate number of waste receptacles for the
volume of waste generated, etc.
SW2, SW4 Low
priority
Greater
than 6
years
County
Commissioners
Action SW-5: Make waste drop off at the
County’s waste collection and recycling centers
more convenient by placing ramps in front of
waste containers or lowering the containers into
pits.
SW7 Priority 4 to 6
years
County
Commissioners
Section 13: Action Plan and Schedule
13-9
12. Actions Concerning Planning and Paying
for
Infrastructure and Services
Policy
Foundation
Priority Time Who Leads
Action PP-1: Continue the initiative for a legally
defensible, rational process by which new
residential units may be allocated to major
subdivisions in a manner consistent with adequate
public facilities (e.g. schools, parks, etc.)
PP2 High
priority
On-
Going
County Planning
Director
Action PP-2: Conduct a study of the fiscal
impacts of rental properties on the financial
balance sheet of the County. Identify how
seasonal demand for services affects the cost of
capital facilities, equipment and certain year round
personnel. Determine how these costs match up
with the tax revenues coming back to the County
from seasonal properties and their occupants.

PP3 Low
priority
Greater
than 6
years
County Manager
as directed
by the County
Commissioners
Action PP-3: The County shall explore the merits
of and opportunities for financial tools for
recovering infrastructure and service costs related
to new growth and development. (e.g. impact fees,
land transfer tax, upzoning fee, user fees, etc.)
PP3 Priority 4 to 6
years
County Manager
as directed
by the County
Commissioners
13. Actions Concerning Natural Hazard
Areas
Policy
Foundation
Priority Time Who Leads
Action NH-1: Form an interagency task force
whose purpose is to develop a plan for the RO-2
COBRA zone to address growth issues likely to
come about as a result of the proposed mid-county
bridge. Bring together personnel from the US Fish
and Wildlife Service, the US Army Corps of
Engineers, the State Division of Coastal
Management, the Nature Conservancy, Currituck
County, as well as area property owners, to
prepare the plan.
NH1, NH2,
NH3, NH4
Priority 4 to 6
years
County
Commissioners
to
initiate the task
force
Action NH-2: Require real estate agents to
disclose problems of building in hazardous
locations, such as along the oceanfront. Require
similar disclosures on subdivision plats and
publicize erosion rates, floodprone areas, etc.
NH1, NH2, Low
priority
Greater
than 6
years
County Planning
Board
Action NH-3: Continue to monitor and implement
appropriate sections of the April 2004 Currituck
County Hazard Mitigation Plan.
NH4 High
Priority
On-
Going
County Manager
as directed
by the County
Commissioners
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
13-10
Action NH-4: Develop a “Shoreline/Sand
Management Plan” as storm hazard mitigation
tool.
NH1, NH2,
NH4, NH7
Low
priority
Greater
than 6
years
County Manager
as directed
by the County
Commissioners
Action NH-5: Expand the Currituck County
Mitigation Plan to include a Post Storm
Reconstruction Plan.
NH1, NH2,
NH3, NH4
Low
priority
Greater
than 6
years
County Manager
as directed
by the County
Commissioners
Action NH-6: To improve the County’s
“Community Rating System, amend the UDO to
require a minimum of one (1) foot of
“freeboard” above the minimum NFIP base flood
elevations as shown on the most recent Flood
Insurance Rate Maps.
NH1, NH2,
NH5
Priority 4 to 6
years
County Planning
Board,
County
Commissioners
14. Actions Concerning Water Quality Policy
Foundation
Priority Time Who Leads
Action WQ- 1: Facilitate the establishment of a
new water quality monitoring program to focus
on likely areas of pollution, such as near sewage
treatment plants, land application areas for sewage
effluent and septage, concentrations of septic
tanks, and stormwater outfalls leading from
developed areas.
WQ 1,
WQ3,
WQ4
Low
priority
Greater
than 6
years
County
Commissioners
Action WQ-2: Petition the State for a
reexamination of water quality designations
(e.g. SA, SB, SC) in Currituck Sound, to have
those designations elevated if possible.
WQ2 High
priority
1 to 3
years
County
Commissioners
Action WQ-3: Continue to implement the recently
adopted amendment to the Currituck County
Unified Development Ordinance requiring an
engineer’s certification that new development
will not cause flooding on adjacent properties.
WQ3, WQ4 High
priority
On-
Going
County Planning
Department
Action WQ-4: Amend the Currituck County
Unified Development Ordinance to require limits
on stormwater runoff that are more strict than
those required by the State Division of Water
Quality. (DWQ requires that only the first 1” of
rain be retained on site.)
WQ3, WQ4 Priority 4 to 6
years
County Planning
Board
Action WQ-5: Prepare a countywide storm water
management plan, including sub-area district
plans to address problems in particular watersheds
or sub-area drainage basins of the county.
WQ8 High
priority
1 to 3
years
County Engineer,
as directed
by the County
Manager
Section 13: Action Plan and Schedule
13-11
Action WQ-6: Work with other government
entities and nonprofit groups to identify parcels
of land that should be considered for protection
or restoration to preserve water quality.
WQ8 High
priority
1 to 3
years
County Engineer,
as directed
by the County
Manager
Action WQ-7: Amend the UDO to provide
incentives for buffers and setbacks for
development adjacent to public trust waters.

WQ3, WQ4,
WQ5, WQ6
Priority 4 to 6
years
County Planning
Board
Action WQ-8: Consider amending the UDO to
incorporate “Low Impact Development” (LID)
concepts for all new development in the County.
LID concepts focus especially on minimizing
impervious surface areas, preserving natural
vegetative ground covers, absorbing stormwater
runoff into the ground rather than collecting and
piping it elsewhere, and ultimately cutting down
on stormwater runoff into the estuary.
WQ3,
WQ4,
WQ5,
WQ6,
WQ7,
Low
priority
Greater
than 6
years
County
Planning Board
15. Actions Concerning Economic Development Policy
Foundation
Priority Time Who Leads
Action ED-1: Finalize the Economic Development
Plan for Currituck County and begin
implementation.
ED2, ED3,
ED4
Priority 4 to 6
years
County Econ
Develop
Director, Econ
Develop
Advisory Board,
and Planning
Director
Action ED-2: Amend the Currituck County
Unified Development Ordinance to create an
overlay district to accommodate significant
entertainment-oriented developments.
ED1, ED2,
ED3
High
priority
1 to 3
years
County Planning
Board,
Economic
Development
Commission
Action ED-3: Develop a certified industrial site
program to include:
• Identification of suitable sites for
certification as “primary” or
“secondary” sites
• Zoning actions to protect suitable
industrial sites
• Utilities extension policies and capital
improvements targeted to suitable
industrial sites
ED2 Low
priority
Greater
than 6
years
County Manager,
Economic
Development
Commission,
and Planning
Director
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
13-12
16. Actions Concerning Community
Appearance
Policy
Foundation
Priority Time Who Leads
Action CA-1: Amend the Currituck County
Unified Development Ordinance to establish a
special highway corridor overlay district for the
US 158/ NC 168 highway corridor. The overlay
district would include standards for driveway cuts,
signage, landscaping, parking lot connections and
other factors to help preserve the appearance and
function of this critical transportation artery.

CA1, CA2 High
priority
1 to 3
years
County Planning
Board
Action CA-2: Amend the Currituck County
Unified Development Ordinance to affirm
prohibitions against off-site signs and businesses
sharing the same lot (2 principal uses not
allowed on same lot.).
CA1, CA5 Low
priority
Greater
than 6
years
County
Planning Board
Action CA-3: Amend the Currituck County
Unified Development Ordinance to clarify
standards for on-site and off-site signage.
CA4 Priority 4 to 6
years
County Planning
Board
Action CA-4: Currituck County will continue to
enforce the Junked Car Ordinance as developed
under the State model for such local laws.
CA9 High
priority
On-
Going
County Planning
Department
Action CA-5: Do not rezone property to either
Light or Heavy Manufacturing if it fronts on
either US 158 or NC 168.
CA1, CA5, Priority 4 to 6
years
County Planning
Board,
County
Commissioners
17. Actions Concerning Historic Preservation Policy
Foundation
Priority Time Who Leads
Action HP-1: Commission a state or foundation
sponsored inventory and assessment of historic
structures and sites in Currituck County.
HP1, HP2,
HP3, HP4,
HP5, HP6
Priority 4 to 6
years
County
Commissioners
Action HP-2: Appoint a task force made up of
representatives of non-profit groups, private
organizations, and interested citizens for the
purpose of preserving and promoting the
architectural and cultural heritage of Currituck
County and its various “communities” e.g.
Aydlett, Snowden, Gibbs Woods, etc.).
HP1, HP3,
HP7
Low
priority
Greater
than 6
years
County
Commissioners
Action HP-3: Develop the areas around the Old
Courthouse and in Corolla Village as historic
districts or “community character districts”, with
consideration given to tying together the various
amenities associated with these unique locations.
HP1, HP2,
HP3, HP5,
HP6, HP7
High
Priority
1 to 3
years
County
Commissioners
Section 13: Action Plan and Schedule
13-13
18. Actions Concerning Public Safety Policy
Foundation
Priority Time Who Leads
Action PS-1: Conduct a study of the need for
additional public safety substations (i.e. fire
and rescue, law enforcement) for strategic service
areas of the County.
PS1 Priority 4 to 6
years
County Manager,
and Public Safety
Service Providers
19. Special Actions Concerning Countywide
Policies
Policy
Foundation
Priority Time Who Leads
Action CW-1: Amendment #2 (2009) designated
approximately 58 acres of the Future Land Use
map from Limited Service area to Full Service
area (Parcel ID 0096000029C0000). The map
amendment includes a contingency clause that
specifies all CAMA approvals for a proposed
marina must be obtained within five years of
Coastal Resources Commission approval
(6/24/2009), otherwise the Full Service
designation sunsets and the Future Land Use map
reverts back to the original Limited Service
designation. The five year sunset clause is
intended to ensure Full Service residential
density is not realized prior to the proposed
marina receiving all CAMA approvals.
CW1 Priority 5 years County
Commissioners
20. Special Actions Concerning the Mainland
Area
Policy
Foundation
Priority Time Who Leads
Action ML-1: Explore the feasibility of
establishing a program allowing for the purchase
or transfer of development rights as a means of
promoting open space preservation in Currituck
County, particularly in designated areas of the
Mainland.
ML1 High
priority
1 to 3
years
County Planning
Board
Action ML-2: Enhance development standards for
Class A manufactured homes, in terms of both
their location and design (aesthetic) standards, and
with an eye toward preserving open space and
farmland.
ML4 Low
priority
Greater
than 6
years
County Planning
Board
21. Special Actions Concerning the Outer
Banks
Policy
Foundation
Priority Time Who Leads
Action OB-1: Amend the Currituck County UDO
to address the real impacts of large “single
family” homes. Employ lot coverage, floor area
ratios, house massing, fire suppression issues,
number of bedrooms and baths, and other factors
to properly control the location, construction and
use of these structures.
OB4, OB5 High
priority
1 to 3
years
County Planning
Board
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
13-14
Action OB-2: Amend the Currituck County
Unified Development Ordinance to create a new
zoning district or zoning overlay district and
related controls explicitly for large houses.
Houses with more than 8 bedrooms would be
required to locate in areas properly zoned for the
new district.
OB4, OB5 High
priority
1 to 3
years
County Planning
Board
Action OB-3: Amend the Currituck County
Unified Development Ordinance to implement a
zoning overlay district to preserve the historic
character of Corolla Village.
OB6 High
priority
1 to 3
years
County Planning
Board
Action OB-4: Continue to enforce the public
nuisance ordinance concerning the condemnation
and removal of buildings that, due to shoreline
erosion, have become located in the public trust
area of the beach.
OB8 High
priority
On-
Going
County Planning
Board
Action OB-5: Monitor the level of traffic volume
driving on the beach by season, day of week, time
of day, etc. Explore ordinance changes or a permit
system for beach vehicular traffic to protect public
health and safety.
OB8 Priority 4 to 6
years
County Planning
Board
Action OB-6: Amend the County’s UDO to affirm
that only residential uses are permitted in the non-
PUD areas of the RO1 district.
OB2 High
priority
1 to 3
years
County Planning
Board
22. Special Actions Concerning Knotts Island Policy
Foundation
Priority Time Who Leads
Action KI-1: Conduct a community needs
assessment to evaluate public facility and service
needs in the Knotts Island area, to include, for
example, fire service, communications, library,
and recreation.
KI3 Priority 4 to 6
years
County Planning
Department
Action KI-2: Establish a stormwater management
service district to address stormwater runoff and
chronic flooding problems on Knotts Island.
KI2 Priority 4 to 6
years
County
Manager/County
Engineer
Action KI-3: Amend the Currituck County
Unified Development Ordinance to create a new
zoning district or zoning overlay district
regulating the placement of new manufactured
homes (i.e. mobile homes) on Knotts Island.
KI5 Low
priority
Greater
than 6
years
County Planning
Board
23. Actions Concerning Plan Distribution and
Follow Up
Policy
Foundation
Priority Time Who Leads
Action DF- 1: Members of appropriate Boards and
Commissions of Currituck County, as well as all
Department Heads and other appropriate staff,
will be given copies of the Land Use Plan.
General ASAP
after
adoption
and
printing
NA County Manager
Section 13: Action Plan and Schedule
13-15
Action DF-2: Copies of the Land Use Plan will be
placed in visible locations at the County Library,
and other County offices frequented by the public.
Such copies shall be available for inspection, and
for purchase.
General ASAP
after
adoption
and
printing
NA County Manager
Action DF-3: Copies of the Land Use Plan shall
be delivered to members of the news media for
their information and reference. Delivery will be
done in conjunction with an information session
on the purpose and uses of the Plan.
General ASAP
after
adoption
and
printing
NA County Planning
Director
Action DF-4: County staff will employ the
policies of the Land Use Plan in evaluating
development proposals and will quote such
policies in drafting staff recommendations to the
County Planning Board and County
Commissioners.
General ASAP
after
adoption
NA County Planning
Director and
Planning Staff
Action DF-5: Appoint an implementation
oversight group to meet semi-annually to review
progress on various actions set forth in the land
use plan. Involve a combination of
“implementers” and citizens in the group.
General At the
time of
adoption
NA County
Commissioners
and
various
implementing
agencies
Action DF-6: Prepare an annual report (one to two
page memo) to the Board of County
Commissioners summarizing actions taken to
implement the Land Use Plan during the previous
year.
General 1 year
after
plan
adoption
NA County Manager
with input
from Oversight
Group

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
References
References 1
REFERENCES
Albemarle Regional Health Services. (03/29/04). Type 4, 5, and 6 Septic Systems
Database. Elizabeth City, NC.

(Currituck County-A) Currituck County. (2004). Currituck County Water Department.
Water Service Area Locator. Obtained from the Internet 04/15/04 at:
http://www.co.currituck.nc.us/government/departments/water/waterservicearealocator.as
px

(Currituck County-B) Currituck County GIS (2004). Landmarks. Currituck, North
Carolina
Currituck County. (2003). Planning Department. Southern Outer Banks Water System.
Currituck County Southern Outer Banks 05/17/2003. Estimated Average Peak Daily
Summer Water Needs at Build Out.

Currituck County. (2002). Water Department. 2002 Annual Drinking Water Quality
Report, Currituck County Water PWSID # 04-16-197, May 1, 2002.

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR).
(02/2003). North Carolina Water Quality Assessment and Impaired Waters List: 2002
Integrated 305(b) and 303(d) Report, February 2003. Division of Water Quality/Planning.
Available on the Internet at:
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/tmdl/General_303d.htm#Downloads

(NCDENR-C) North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
(NCDENR). (3/02/2004). Division of Water Quality. Environmental Enforcement Data.
Available on the Internet at: http://www.enr.state.nc.us/novs/wq0503.pdf

(NCDENR-D) North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
(NCDENR). (03/12/2004). Division of Water Quality (DWQ). Non-Discharge Permitting
Unit. Animal Waste Permits Database. Raleigh, North Carolina.

(NCDENR-E) North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
(NCDENR). Division of Parks and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program. (0 1/28/2002)
Significant Natural Heritage Areas Database. Distributed by the North Carolina Center
for Geographic Information & Analysis (NCCGIA). Raleigh, North Carolina.

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR). (2004).
Division of Environmental Health. On-Site Wastewater Section. Laws and Rules for
Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems. Obtained 04/12/04 from the internet at:
http://www.deh.enr.state.nc.us/oww/Rulelaw/rules.htm.

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR). (2002).
Division of Water Resources. 2002 Local Water Supply Plan DRAFT for Currituck
County Mainland. Part 1: Water Supply System Report for Calendar Year 2002; Part 2:
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
Reference 2
Water Supply Planning Report; Part 3: Water conservation and Demand Management.
Raleigh, NC. Available on the Internet at: http://dwr.ehnr.state.nc.us/cgi-
bin/foxweb.exe/c:%5Cfoxweb%5Clwsp972%5E04-27-01 0

North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT). (1988). Currituck County
Thoroughfare Plan.

North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT). (1999). Thoroughfare Plan
Technical Report for Currituck County.

North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT). (2003). 2004-2010
Transportation Improvement Program. Available at
http://www.ncdot.org/planning/development/TIP/TIP/

North Carolina Department of Transportation. (1999). Traffic Survey County Maps 1999.
Available at
http://www.ncdot.org/planning/statewide/gis/DataDist/GISTrafSurvMaps.html

North Carolina Department of Transportation. (2002). Traffic Survey County Maps 2002.
Available at
http://www.ncdot.org/planning/statewide/gis/DataDist/GISTrafSurvMaps.html

North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). (2004). Large Surface Sewage
Treatment Plants Permitted/Inspected by Division of Water Quality. Obtained from the
Currituck County Planning Department 03/23/04.

(NCREDC – A) North Carolina Rural Economic Development Center (NCREDC).
(1998). Water Distribution Systems - Type A Service Areas: NC Center for Geographic
Information & Analysis, Raleigh, North Carolina.

(NCREDC – B) North Carolina Rural Economic Development Center (NCREDC).
(1998). Water Distribution Systems - Type B Service Areas: NC Center for Geographic
Information & Analysis, Raleigh, North Carolina.

North Carolina Division of Environmental Health (NCDEH). (03/12/04) Shellfish
Sanitation Section & Recreation Water Quality Division. (3/12/2004). Recreational
Water Quality Monitoring and Advisory Information Database. Raleigh, North Carolina.

North Carolina Geological Survey (NCGS) (08/25/200 1) Permitted Active and Inactive
Mines in North Carolina. Retrieved March 01, 2004, from:
http://www.geology.enr.state.nc.us/Permitted%20Mines%201999-2000/permitte.htm

United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service
(USDA-NRCS), 1982. Soil Survey of Currituck County, NC.

Appendices
A-1
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
(As Approved at the Start of Phase 1)
Currituck County will be updating the 1990 CAMA Land Use Plan during FY 2003-2004 and FY 2004-2005. Grant funding
assistance has been received from the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) through the Local Government
Planning and Management Grant Program to prepare the update. The funding agreement provides that Currituck County will
“employ a variety of educational efforts and participation techniques to assure that all socio-economic segments of the community
and non-resident property owners have opportunities to participate during plan development” [15A NCAC7L .0506 (a)].
Development and implementation of the Currituck County Citizen Participation Plan is the main resource to address these public
participation requirements.
The Citizen Participation Plan provides the following opportunities:
• Sharing of information about the CAMA land use planning process between the local government, the State, and local
residents
• Actively involving citizens in the process of identifying land use issues, identifying and evaluating options and the
development of land use policies
Active citizen involvement in the development of the Land Use Plan is essential to the development of a quality plan and the
success of its implementation. To provide information to the public and to encourage adequate citizen involvement, the following
Citizen Participation Plan will be utilized by Currituck County.
Designation of Lead Planning Group: The Currituck County Board of Commissioners has appointed a Land Use Plan Steering
Committee to oversee preparation of the Land Use Plan Update. The Land Use Plan Steering Committee is composed of residents of
the County’s three sub-areas. Members of the Steering Committee and their contact information are listed on an attachment to the
Citizen Participation Plan.
The Land Use Plan Steering Committee will advise and coordinate plan development with the Currituck County Board of
Commissioners and the County’s consultant, BLUE: Land, Water, Infrastructure, PA (BLWI).
The Land Use Plan Steering Committee will have the following duties and responsibilities:
• Provide overall direction for development of the Draft Land Use Plan
• Serve as a public contact for citizens to get information and to comment on the proposed plan
• Review technical planning materials for accuracy
• Assist with preparation of major plan elements, including identification of concerns and key planning issues, development
of a community vision, goal development, preparation of draft policies and future land use map
• Assist with organization, management and facilitation of public participation events
• Help publicize public participation events in the community
• Recommend and present a draft land use plan to the Currituck County Board of Commissioners
The Steering Committee will usually meet on the fourth Monday of each month at 7:00 PM. Meeting locations will rotate among the
County’s sub-areas. Meetings on the Mainland will take place on the 2nd floor of the Old Historic County Courthouse Building
located at 153 Courthouse Road in Currituck, and Griggs Elementary School. Meetings on the Outer Banks beaches will occur at the
Corolla Fire Department in Whalehead Subdivision. Knotts Island/Gibbs Woods meetings will take place at Knotts Island
Elementary School.
All Land Use Plan Steering Committee meetings will be advertised in advance. The meeting notices will specify date, time, and
location and meeting topic.
All meetings of the Steering Committee will include time for public comment from citizens. A sign-up sheet for those who wish to
address the Steering Committee will be provided at each meeting. The County will keep a record of residents and property owners
who speak at Land Use Plan meetings and other plan events and will retain any written comments that are received. The names of
the speakers and written comments will be provided to the Division of Coastal Management (DCM) District Planner for use in draft
plan review.
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan
A-2
An initial orientation meeting with the Steering Committee is scheduled for Monday, October 27, 2003 at 7:00 PM on the second
floor of the Old Historic Courthouse Building in Currituck.
Initial Public Information Meetings: The County’s funding agreement with DENR requires a public information meeting(s) at the
beginning of the process. The Currituck County Land Use Plan Update process will include four public information meetings. The
meetings will provide educational opportunities to inform the general public of the purpose of the CAMA Land Use Plan and to
outline the County’s public participation process. The meetings are tentatively scheduled as follows:
1. Monday, November 24, 2003 at 7:00 PM at the Old Historic County Courthouse Building, 153 Courthouse Road,
Currituck
2. Tuesday, December 9, 2003 at 7:00 PM at the Corolla Fire Department in Whalehead Subdivision
3. Tuesday, January 20, 2004 at 7:00 PM at Knotts Island Elementary School
4. Monday, January 26, 2004 at 7:00 P.M. at Griggs Elementary School
The following items will be discussed at the Initial Public Information Meetings:
• Policy statements contained in the current (1990) Currituck County Land Use Plan
• Effect of current policies on the County
• Ways the current plan has been used to guide development during the last planning period
• An explanation of how Currituck County will report to the public and solicit the views of citizens in the development of
updated policy statements
• The tools to be used to report on the planning process to the public during plan development
• A description of the methods and techniques that shall be used to solicit public participation and input from residents of
the County and non-resident property owners, including the results that are expected from these methods and
techniques
• The general meeting schedule for meetings of the Land Use Plan Steering Committee to discuss the Land Use Plan
In addition to providing information to citizens regarding the land use planning process, these initial meetings will also serve as
Community Meetings to receive input from the public on issues, concerns and opportunities.
The County will give two public notices for each of the initial public information meetings. The first notice will be published in the
Daily Advance, Coastland Times and Virginia Pilot not less than 30 days before the meeting. The second notice will be published
not less than 10 days before the meeting. In addition, the County will notify local members of the Coastal Resources Advisory
Council (CRAC) and the DCM District Planner of the date, time, and place of the meeting.
Public participation tools: Currituck County will use several methods to solicit public participation in the Land Use Plan process.
These methods were selected to assist in meeting the citizen participation objectives of education, listening, collaboration and
support. The public participation tools include:
• Community meetings, in conjunction with the Initial Land Public Information Meetings, will be held in each of the County’s
sub-areas (Knotts Island/Gibbs Woods, the Mainland and the Currituck County Outer Banks beaches) at the beginning of
the process. These meetings will provide an opportunity for a wide range of residents and property owners to express their
views on land use and development issues and will assist in development of a preliminary assessment of opinions and
attitudes. It will also provide an opportunity for citizens to learn about the views of others. This method will help meet the
listening, education and collaborative goals of the citizen participation program and develop support for the land use
planning process. The Community Meetings for the Mainland will occur on November 24, 2003 at the Old Historic
Courthouse Building in Currituck and on January 26, 2004 at Griggs Elementary School. The Community Meeting for the
Outer Banks beaches will take place on December 9, 2003 at the Corolla Fire Department in Whalehead Subdivision.
The Community Meeting for Knotts Island/Gibbs Woods will take place on January 20, 2004 at Knotts Island Elementary
School.
• Open houses will allow for public review of maps and policies. This will provide an opportunity for the community to express
views and concerns about what is being proposed. It provides an informal setting for stakeholders to examine work
products and to interact with members of the planning group. This technique will assist in meeting the listening and
collaborative objectives of the citizen participation program.
• Media releases will keep the community informed and educated about the Land Use Plan process. Newspaper articles and
public service announcements (radio and TV) will be used to report planning progress, as well as to encourage
participation in and support for the planning process. Information will also be submitted for publication in Homeowner
Association Newsletters.
• Currituck County website updates will be used to report planning progress to and solicit participation by the public, including
non-resident property owners.
• Information flyers concerning land use plan meetings will also be posted in the community. Notices will be posted at public
locations such as the Post Office, Food Lion, fire departments and the Currituck County Satellite Office.
Appendices
A-3

TENTATIVE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SCHEDULE
Date Location Event Outcomes Expected
10/27/03 Old Historic
Courthouse Building,
Currituck
Steering Committee • Introduce SC to the CAMA planning process
• Familiarize members with SC role/responsibilities
• Identify SC concerns and issues
• Discussion of Citizen Participation Plan
11/17/03 Old Historic
Courthouse Building,
Currituck
Board of
Commissioners
Approval of Citizen Participation Plan
11/24/03 Old Historic
Courthouse Building,
Currituck
Initial Public
Information/ Mainland
Sub-area Community
Meeting
• Increase community understanding of current land
use and development policies, their effect, and way
current plan is used
• Familiarize community with process for reporting to
public
• Familiarize public with process for soliciting
community input
• Receive public input on issues, concerns and

opportunities
• Review and discuss previous opinion surveys
• Develop list of most important issues and concerns
12/9/03 Corolla Fire
Department, Whalehead
Subdivision
Initial Public
Information
Meeting/Outer Banks
beaches Sub-area
Community Meeting
Same as above
1/20/04 Knotts Island
Elementary School Initial Public
Information Meeting -
Knotts Island/Gibbs
Woods Sub-area
Community Meeting
Same as above
1/26/04 Griggs Elementary
School Initial Public Info
Meeting/Lower
Currituck Mainland
Sub-area Community
Meeting
Same as above
2/23/04 Corolla Fire
Department ,
Whalehead Subdivision
Joint Meeting with
Steering
Committee/Currituck
County Economic
Development Board
Develop and agree upon the following:
• Most important existing and emerging growth-
related conditions for Currituck County
• Key planning issues for Currituck County
• Vision statement for Currituck County
Review technical analyses of following:
Population, Housing , Economy
3/22/04 Knotts Island
Elementary School
Steering Committee Review technical analyses of following:
• Natural systems
• Existing land use
4/26/04 Old Historic
Courthouse Building,
Currituck
Steering Committee Review technical analyses of the following:
• Stormwater
• Community Facilities
5/24/04 Griggs Elementary
School
Steering Committee Review technical analyses of the following:
• Land suitability
• Current plans and policies
6/28/04 Old Historic
Courthouse Building,
Currituck
Community Open
House with Steering
Committee
Citizens review and comment on work completed on
Land Use Plan
7/26/04 Griggs Elementary
School
Steering Committee • Identify needed adjustments to Phase II Citizen
Participation Plan
• Begin review of preliminary draft land use plan
policies
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan

A-4

Date Location Event Outcomes Expected
8//04 Old Historic
Courthouse Building,
Currituck
Board of
Commissioners
Approval of Phase II Citizen Participation Plan
8/23/04 Old Historic
Courthouse Building,
Currituck
Steering Committee Complete review of draft land use plan policies
9/27/04 Corolla Fire
Department, Whalehead
Subdivision
Community Open
House with Steering
Committee
• Citizens review and comment on work completed on
Land Use Plan
• Steering Committee review Future Land Use Map
and Tools for Managing Development
10/25/04 Knotts Island
Elementary School
Community Open
House with Steering
Committee
• Citizens review and comment on work completed on
Land Use Plan
• Steering Committee complete review and agree on
preliminary draft Land Use Plan
11/04 Old Historic
Courthouse Building,
Currituck
Board of
Commissioners
• Present preliminary draft Land Use Plan
• Identify any needed changes
11/22/04 Corolla Fire
Department, Whalehead
Subdivision
Steering Committee • Review revised draft Land Use Plan
• Receive public comment on revised draft plan
1/24/05 Knotts Island
Elementary School
Steering Committee • Continue review of revised draft Land Use Plan
• Receive public comment on revised draft plan
4/25/05 Old Historic
Courthouse Building,
Currituck
Steering Committee Review DCM plan comments and make necessary
adjustments
5/05 Old Historic
Courthouse Building,
Currituck
Board of
Commissioners
Required Public Adoption Hearing

CURRITUCK COUNTY
LAND USE PLAN STEERING COMMITTEE

Martha Burns
156 Lewark Lane
Knotts Island, NC 27950
Eddie Hawley
8364 Caratoke Hwy
Powells Point, NC 27966
Phil Kratzer
PO Box 186
Poplar Branch NC 27965
Ginger Webster
PO Box 241
Corolla NC 27927
[phone] [phone] [phone] [phone]
[e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail]
Woody Gardner
2844 Caratoke Hwy
Currituck, NC 27929
[phone]
[e-mail]
David Palmer
3861 Caratoke Hwy
Barco NC 27917
[phone]
[e-mail]

Connie Johnson
423 Brandt Rd.
Corolla NC 27927
[phone]

Jerry Wright
PO Box 24
Jarvisburg NC 27947
[phone] (h)
[phone] (w)
Joe Kovacs
109 Brookdale Ct
Moyock NC 27958
[phone]
[e-mail]
Sandra Sutton
108 Goose Castle Terrace
Currituck NC 27929
[phone]
[e-mail]
Andre Grizzle
103 Oak Dale Dr.
Moyock, NC 27958
[phone]
[e-mail]

Paul Farr
113 Emperor’s Isle
Coinjock NC 27923
[phone] (h)
[phone] (w)
[e-mail]
Appendices

A-5
C I T I Z E N P A R T I C I P A T I O N P L A N
(As Amended And Approved For Phase 2)
CAMA Land Use Plan Update for Currituck County
Summary of Planning Process, Public Involvement Opportunities and Schedule
Timeframe* Task Activity Public
Meeting
During
Visit #
TASK 1:ORGANIZE FOR PLANNING & PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
Mid-August 1.1 Project Organization/Admin. Priorities/Phase 1 Debriefing 1
Late August 1.2 Gather Materials and Products from the Phase 1 Effort 1
TASK 2:LEADERSHIP ORIENTATION/ DISCUSSION OF MAJOR
GROWTH ISSUES
August 30 2.1 Steering Committee/ County Commissioners/ Planning Board
Orientation/ Issue Identification/ Public Involvement
Yes 1
August 30 2.2 Meeting with Steering Committee to Discuss Growth Issues Yes 1
TASK 3:DEVELOP POLICY STATEMENTS AND GROWTH
STRATEGY MAP
Sept/Oct/Nov 3.1 Develop Draft Policy Statements
Sept/Oct/Nov 3.2 Develop Prelim Growth Strategy (Land Classification) Map
Oct 25, Nov 22,
Dec 13
3.3 Review Policy Statements and Land Classification Map with
Steering Committee
Yes 2,3,4
TASK 4:IMPLEMENTATION ACTIONS
December 4.1 Draft Preliminary Implementation Actions
January 10th ‘05 4.2 Review Implementation Actions with Steering Committee. Yes 5
TASK 5:REVIEW PLAN POLICIES, GROWTH STRATEGY MAP
AND IMPLEMENTATION ACTIONS WITH THE PUBLIC
January 5.1 Prepare for “Future of Currituck: Land Use Week”
Feb 14,15,16,17 5.2 Future of Currituck Land Use Week (4 Open Houses) Yes, 4 6
February 18 5.3 Review Public Comments with Steering Committee Yes 6
Feb/March 5.4 Revise Policies and Implementation Actions.
TASK 6:PREPARE NARRATIVE FOR POLICY STATEMENTS &
GROWTH STRATEGY (LAND CLASSIFICATION) MAP
March 6.1 Prepare Draft Narrative
March 6.2 Distribute Draft Phase 2 Document to Steering Committee
April 5 6.3 Review Draft Phase 2 Document with Steering Committee Yes 7
TASK 7:INFORMAL STEERING COMMITTEE WORK SESSION
WITH PLANNING BRD & COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
May 3 7.1 Hold Joint Work Session of Steering Committee, County
Commissioners, and Planning Board
Yes 8
TASK 8:COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO APPROVE PHASE 2
POLICY DOCUMENT FOR STATE REVIEW
May16 8.1 County Commissioners approve an “adoptable” plan, for the
purposes of sending it on to the State for their review.
Yes 9
TASK 9:STATE REVIEW/REVISIONS
May 17 9.1 Submission of “adoptable” Phase 2 Policy document to State for
review and comment. Wait for comments.
w/in 14 days after
comments
9.2 Consultant will review State comments and draft recommended
revisions for incorporation into a revised plan.
w/in 14 days of
approval
9.3 Make revisions as authorized by County Commissioners.
TASK 10:CO COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING & ADOPTION
30 days notice 10.1 County Commissioners Hold Public Hearing, Adopt Plan Yes 10
w/in 14 days of
hearing
10.2 Make Final Revisions to Plan If Necessary
TASK 11:CRC APPROVAL
As scheduled 11.1 CRC approval of Land Use Plan. Yes CRC
w/in 14 days of
CRC Approval
TASK 12:DELIVER FINAL PHASE 2 DOCUMENT FOR PRINTING
*D ates a re tentative /sub jec t to c ha nge
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan

A-6

DETAI L S CONCE RNI NG PHASE 2 PUBLIC P ARTI CIP ATI ON PL AN
CAM A L and Use Pl an Update for Currituck Cou nty
The preceding page provides a comprehensive overview as to how various parts of the plan will be developed in concert with
public input, review and comment. It also suggests a tentative schedule for completing the plan and holding numerous public
meetings. The following paragraphs provide greater detail as to the purpose of various public input meetings. Also described
below are other opportunities for public education and input that may not require attendance at a public meeting, work session or
hearing.
The public participation plan includes the following elements:
• Public Inp ut from Ph ase 1. Public input gathered and documented during Phase 1 shall be reviewed for
use in drafting the Policies and Actions of Phase 2, as well as the Growth Strategy Map. Research conducted
during Phase 1 in response to citizen concerns shall also serve as a reference for plan development during
Phase 2.
• Lead Planning Grou p. The Land Use Plan Steering Committee shall continue to serve in a leadership role
and as a conduit and sounding board for citizen input during Phase 2. Committee members shall take an active
role in leading and facilitating public input meetings. They shall also review and comment upon draft policies,
actions and mapping during plan development.
• Committee M eetings. All Steering Committee meetings shall be open to the public and the news media.
All growth policies, land classification mapping and implementation actions, (as well as subsequent revisions),
shall be discussed openly at Steering Committee meetings. Citizens especially interested in following the
course of policy development may find “sitting in” on these Committee meetings informative.
• Joint Work Session with County Commissioners and Planning Board. The County Commissioners and
County Planning Board shall be directly consulted during a joint work session with the Steering Committee at
the beginning of the Phase 2 process. The primary purpose of this joint work session will be to allow County
leaders serving on these boards the opportunity to identify what they believe to be the major growth issues
facing the county. This work session shall be open to the general public as well as the news media. Major
issues identified will be documented for distribution to the news media as the County may see fit.
• Fu tu re of Cu rri tu ck W eek-- Arou nd the Co unt y. “Future of Currituck Week” will feature four open-housestyle
public input meetings hosted by the Steering Committee and designed to maximize citizen comment and dialogue
with the Committee members. Each of the four meetings will be held in a different area of the county to allow
for maximum participation by citizens nearby.
• W alk Aro und Surve y. A “walk-around survey” shall be employed during the open house meetings to solicit
public input on polices, actions and the growth strategy map in an efficient, organized and enjoyable manner.
The survey shall also be designed to have a self-educating affect on those who participate. Upon completion of
these open house meetings, the Committee should have both a quantitative and qualitative assessment of
which policies and actions have the greatest support of area citizens and which do not.
• Su rvey M ay Continue Be yond Future of Cu rri tu ck Week. At the County’s discretion, large, wall-
mounted survey sheets written upon during Future of Currituck Week may be posted for public display even after
the week is over, allowing other citizens to see the results from the open house meetings and to add their views
to the same sheets.
• Sp eci al Outreach to County Appointed and Elected Officials. All County appointed and elected
officials will be invited to attend one or more of the Future of Currituck Week open houses.
• Active Recruitmen t of Area Citizen s b y Steerin g Committee and Coun t y Staff. Steering Committee
Members and County staff will be charged with specific responsibility for actively recruiting citizens to Future of
Currituck Week open houses.
• Public No tice of Future of Currituck Week. Notice of Future of Currituck Week meetings shall be run in local
newspaper(s) of general circulation.
• Sp eci al Fl yer/An nou ncement. A specially designed flyer announcing Future of Currituck Week and describing
the purpose of the land use plan shall be prepared for general distribution in the weeks leading up to the
Appendices

A-7
meetings.
• Use of County Website. The County shall continue to present information about the Land Use Plan and its
progress on the County website. Citizens will be invited to also submit their comments on land use issues via this
medium. This method may be especially helpful to out of town property owners and second homeowners who
wish to express their viewpoint without having to travel to the County specifically for one or more public meetings.
• Second Joint Work Session with County Commissioners and Planning Board. The County Commissioners
and County Planning Board shall be directly consulted for a second time during a joint work session with the
Steering Committee near the end of the Phase 2 process. The primary purpose of the second joint work session will
be to allow Steering Committee members to present an overview of the plan to members of the County
Commission and the Planning Board in an informal, non-pressured setting. This work session shall be open to the
general public as well as the news media.
• Public Hearing of the County Commissioners. The County Commissioners will hold an advertised formal
public hearing near the end of the planning process to ensure that citizens may speak directly to their elected
officials about the proposed land use plan.
• Certification of the Plan by the Coastal Resources Commission. Review and certification of the land use plan
by the Coastal Resources Commission will provide an additional opportunity for citizen comment at more than a
local level of interest.
• Plan Printing and Distribution. Following local adoption and State certification of the Land Use Plan, multiple
copies of the plan will be printed and made available by the County for public review. The County will also issue
copies of the plan to all relevant County boards involved in growth and development issues.

Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan

A-8

APPENDIX B. OPINION SURVEY/QUESTIONAIRE
Below is a copy of the web-based public opinion survey that was employed to garner the views of citizens who may
not have been able to attend the many public meetings held for the land use plan.

Appendices
A-9

APPENDIX C. MAJOR LAND USE ISSUES IDENTIFIED BY CITIZENS
AT COMMUNITY MEETINGS
The Land Use Plan Update process in Currituck County was initiated by a series of four community meetings held
throughout the County. Meetings were held in the upper Mainland (Old Historic Courthouse), Outer Banks beaches
(Corolla Fire Department), Knotts Island (Knotts Island Elementary School) and the lower Mainland (Griggs
Elementary School). The meetings were held from November 2003 through January 2004.
The purpose of the meetings was to familiarize Steering Committee members and citizens with the CAMA land use
planning process and public participation tools to promote citizen involvement. As part of the meetings, citizens were
asked to identify urgent/pressing land use concerns. At the end of the meetings, those present were given the
opportunity to vote on the most important issues that had been identified.
Beginning with the meeting in Knotts Island, citizens were asked to identify issues related to the Coastal Resources
Commission’s management topics for land use planning: Public Water Access, Natural Hazards, Infrastructure
Carrying Capacity, Land Use Compatibility, Water Quality, Local Areas of Concern.
Listed below are the issues identified by citizens at the community meetings. The number of votes each issues
received is indicated in parentheses following the issue statement.
Upper Mainland (Old Historic Courthouse) November 24, 2003
Like open space/rural areas in the County (10)
Need to continue to examine the purchase of development rights (10)
Like or satisfied with environmental protection provided by state and county regulations (9)
Desire more economic development activity to generate additional revenue (7)
Need to plan for better drainage (6)
Concerned with farmland loss caused by economic pressures (6)
Dislike the fact that folks move to Currituck County and then want to change it (5)
Need more street lights and sidewalks (5)
Dislike inequality of fire protection throughout the County (5)
Like the high building code standards in the County (4)
Need more water (4)
Need more indoor recreation facilities (3)
Not enough affordable housing (2)
Not enough water (2)
Need more retirement (adult) communities (2)
Traffic concerns (2)
Some land in Currituck County should not be developed (2)
Like the convenience of Knott’s Island to Virginia (1)
The following issues were identified, but received no votes:
• Rising water table is a concern
• Recreation facilities need to be better sited for citizens
Outer
Banks
Beaches
December
9, 2003
• Government allowing development without requiring adequate infrastructure (13)
• Quality of life (9)
Provide facilities for social life
Provide public facilities on the beach
• Consider north/south and east/west solutions to transportation problems (8)
• Commercial uses should be centralized (8)
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan

A-10

• 4WD beach road issues (5)
• Stress of very large houses on the community (5)
• Inadequate water (5)
• Maintain cleanliness of beaches (5)
• As permanent population increases, would like more emphasis as a year-round rather than a tourist
destination (4)
• Housing density and population density/intensity (3)
• Are we a permanent or resort community? (3)
• Drainage concerns (3)
• Sand fences impeding transportation to Carova Beach (2)
• More connection between government and people on the beach (2)
• Lack of schools to entice families with children (2)
• Need a Deputy County Manager to deal with beach issues (2)
• Growth has outpaced existing transportation capacity, need solutions now (2)
• Not enough facilities for the resort population (1)
• Large number of bedrooms in beach houses (1)
• Wastewater concerns (1)
The following issues were identified, but received no votes:
• Commercialization of Outer Banks Beaches
• Economic impact on density of development
• Public parking and access to ocean/sound
• Inadequate transportation infrastructure
• Need short-term and long-term solutions to transportation problems
• Accommodating service workers
• Dissatisfaction of solid waste collection
• Improve Ocean Pearl Road
• Lack of public recreation facilities for those without subdivision amenities
• Incorporation of the beach
• Integration of facilities (water, sewer, etc.) among beach neighborhoods
• Establish timeline for needed improvements
Water, sewer, drainage, maximum density
• Need long-range plan to meet projected water needs
State should conduct another water study
Water should not be a County problem
Look at a regional water system
• Beach tax revenues go to mainland rather than funding improvements on the beach
• Non-resident property owners have different priorities than full-time residents
• Need to protect appearance of the area
• Concern with proximity of wastewater facilities to drinking water wells
• No one person on the beach has power/authority to fix problems on the beach
• Voter apathy
Knotts
Island
January
20, 2004
The specific topics and comments are as follows (the votes that were posted by each topic after the meeting are in
parenthesis):
Public Water Access
• Need more access / there is not enough parking on the Brumley Road Access (0)
• The Cason Point Road access does not have any parking and the bulkhead is not safe (1)
• There is a need to balance public access with private enterprise / private marinas (0)
• People who use the ramps may be from outside NC - but also some people use the ramp to access property
in Carova (0)
• Inadequate roads and other infrastructure associated with access (0)
• There should not be any public funding for new public access/ boat ramps (5)
• More public access will necessitate the need for more Sheriff/EMS services for boating traffic (0)
Appendices
A-11

Infrastructure Carrying Capacity
• There is a need for better roads (9)
• The culvert on Brumley Road does not drain well(2)
• DOT needs more personnel for road maintenance (3)
• There is a need for the road ditches to be maintained better (8)
• The Marsh Causeway Bridge is dangerous and needs to be fixed (9)
• DOT needs to do a traffic study for Marsh Causeway to see if the road will support more development (0)
• Why was Moyock Middle School built too small and $20 Million Dollars wasted (0)
• There is a need for better planning for schools and what the future needs will be 0)
• There needs to be a cap on mobile homes to cut down on the number of students (0)
• There is a problem with the management of the solid waste facility not being dumped enough (1)
• There needs to be a paid fire department (6)
• A better fire rating is needed for Knotts Island (6)
• No central wastewater systems on Knotts Island (3)
Land Use Compatibility
• Minimum 3 Acre Lot Size on Knotts Island (24)
• Minimum 2 Acre Lot Size on Knotts Island because the land is so hard to maintain (9)
• Against “cluster development” (10)
• Maintain caps on Mobile Home Parks (6)
• Taxes commensurate with services on mobile home parks (0)
Natural Hazards
• Better public communications to residents after disasters - better use of Public Information Officer (2)
• Establish public access / phone line for Knotts Island (2)
• Availability of Knotts Island School or other public buildings during disasters as shelters (0)
• Better utility service recovery after power loss (0)
• Use Virginian Pilot to get information to Knotts Island. (0)
Water Quality
• Initiate a water quality testing program (3)
• Restricting boating access because gasoline engines could harm waters with leaks (1)
• The County needs to provide support and funding for pumping septic systems (1)
• Increased lot sizes to reduce building density and thereby improving water quality (7)
Local Areas of Concern
• Control/behavior of school children on the ferry (1)
• Commissioners need more citizen input on major purchases of land (1)
• The schools are good and we need to maintain the quality (0)
• Problems with wells being near septic systems; need better records and investigations before new septic
permits are given (0)
• Need a County Library on Knotts Island (6)
• Need more access to school facilities after hours and re-open community center (3)
• Need more recreation programs on Knotts Island (5)
• Preserve farmland (1)
• Don’t pursue and give up on the Currituck Lighthouse (0)
• No more subdivisions with Open Space (0)
• Trash pickup is needed (4)

Lower Mainland
January 26, 2004
The specific topics and comments are as follows (the votes that were posted by each topic after the meeting are in
parenthesis):
Public Water Access
• More public beach access is needed (5)
• Need a land banking plan for acquisition of water access property throughout the County (4)
• More public water accesses are needed throughout County, especially in areas where there is no
public or private access available (3)
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan

A-12

• Water access planning is needed and should include provisions for buffer zones from surrounding properties
(1)
• The County should provide support for ecotourism (1)
Natural Hazards
• A mid-County bridge is needed for hurricane evacuation (8)
• Stormwater control needs organization/coordination between the County and NCDOT (6)
• More local stormwater controls are needed (2)
• County staff should provide more/better education on drainage issues (0)
Infrastructure Carrying Capacity
• A mid-county bridge is needed to address traffic congestion on 158 in the southern part of the county (4)
• The County needs a water supply that is adequate and available for fire suppression (2)
• Secondary roads should be connected (2)
• The County needs a central sewer system (1)
• More water towers are needed to increase fire flows (1)
• The County should allow municipalities to incorporate and let them handle water/sewer issues (1)
• Central sewer districts are needed to address growth (0)
• Central sewer districts are not needed, and will only increase growth (0)
Land Use Compatibility
• Restrict commercial buildings by aesthetics/architectural design standards/restrictive covenants (3)
• Improve appearance of 158/168 corridor (1)
• Eliminate/reduce billboards along 158/168 corridor (1)
• Increase landscape buffering to improve appearance of businesses (0)
• Zoning should be compatible with surroundings and spot zoning should be eliminated (0)
Water Quality
• Continue ban on discharge into waters to protect water quality (including brine from RO treatment, except
into ocean) (3)
• Regulation of upstream water pollution from VA (1)
• Require on-site retention ponds and regulate more strictly than DWQ
• Provide education to citizens on landscape buffer zones to stop runoff
• Create landscape regulations to address stormwater runoff (0)
Local Areas of Concern
• A mid-county bridge is needed (4)
• A police/sheriff substation is needed in the southern part of County to speed up emergency response times
(3)
• Incorporate municipalities to provide more/better services (2)
• Provide equestrian paths and opportunities for equestrian activities/shows (2)
• Provide another rest area for beach traffic along the 15 8/168 corridor (2)
• Continue with historic preservation effort throughout the County – initiative that began with the County’s
purchase of the Whalehead Club (1)
Provide landscape medians on 158/168 to improve appearance and increase traffic safety (1)
Provide more pedestrian ferries from the mainland to the beach – consider running one from Poplar Branch
to Corolla (1)
More interconnected bicycle paths are needed throughout the county (0)
The County should provide more recreational opportunities for youth (0)
Appendices
A-13

APPENDIX D. EXPLANATION OF DEMOGRAPHIC AND POPULATION
STATISTICS
According to the US Census Bureau (USCB) decennial census statistics are considered to be 100% data based on short-
form questionnaires that are sent to every person and housing unit and long-form questionnaires that are sampled of
every 1 in 6 persons and households. All demographic data for the non-decennial years are estimates based on the latest
decennial data. Population estimates are released annually by the US Census Bureau and are calculated by using
predictor variables or administrative records that are available on an annual basis. Examples of some administrative
records include: birth and death certificates, Internal Revenue Service data, Medicare enrollment records, Armed Forces
data, etc. Growth rates based on changes in these administrative records are combined with the latest decennial census
statistics to form the yearly demographic estimates (USCB 2003).
Population Estimates
U.S. Census Bureau annual demographic estimates are considered to be rough estimates based on administrative
records easily available to Federal Demographers. State Demographers are privy to more detailed annual administrative
records and may have access to local data from the Department of Motor Vehicles, housing permits, Medicare, birth and
death data, and school enrollment data which can be analyzed to produce population estimates. The North Carolina
Demographers Unit uses a similar methodology and any annual administrative records available to make their population
estimates.
For example, in calculating the 2002 North Carolina county population estimates, the North Carolina State Demographer
used the 2002 US Census Bureau population estimates (that were released in April 2003) as a starting base (North
Carolina State Demographics Unit 2003). For this 2002 estimate, the U.S. Census Bureau assumed that the institutional
population for each North Carolina county would be the same as that of 2001 (NCSDU 2003). Available data from current
state Medicare enrollees and all North Carolina military bases and institutions proved that assumption invalid, so the data
was used to adjust the US Census Bureau’s original estimate (NCSDU 2003). Due to the fact the North Carolina
Demographer has access to more detailed administrative records, demographic data released by the state may differ
slightly from US Census Bureau data estimates and can be considered to be more accurate.
Population Projections
A population projection differs from an estimate in that it relies on certain assumptions about long-term trends in data that
are not yet available, while an estimate is based on data from predictor variables or administrative records that are
available for the estimate year. Recent population projections were released in June 2002 by the North Carolina Office of
State Budget and Management for all geography types in the state. The base decade used to determine the forecasting
trend for the population projections is 1990-2000 (NCSDU 2002). The most fundamental base year for these projections is
the 2000 US Census Bureau’s modified age, race and sex file (NCSDU 2002). The most basic technique used to project
the population projections for age, race and sex is to combine the trends of birth and death data, migration data and
institutional population (NCSDU 2002). It is important to note that it was assumed all institutional population would remain
constant after 2000 (NCSDU 2002).

Housing, Income, Employment and Economic Statistics
Statistics regarding housing, income, employment and economics are not generated by the North Carolina State
Demographics Unit. They are listed on the North Carolina State Demographics Internet site for convenience, but are
generated by federal agencies including the US Census Bureau and the Bureau of Economic Analysis. All data of this
type included in this report has been checked for consistency between the federal agencies and the North Carolina State
Demographics Unit. Any discrepancies have been noted.
Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan

A-14

APPENDIX E. FUTURE LAND USE PLAN COMPATIBILITY MATRIX
Table A-1 Consistency Review of Future Land Use Map Designations and Existing Zoning Districts
Zoning
Districts

A RA R RO1 RO2 RR GB C LBH LM HM PUD PRD RMF
Minimum
Lot Size
(Sq. Ft.):
3 ac 1 ac 1 ac 1 ac 3 ac 15,000 25,000 35,000 15,000 25,000 25,000 10,000-
20,000
10,000-
20,000 5 ac
Maximum
Lot
Coverage
(Sq. Ft.):
30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 30% 35%
Maximum
Building
Height (Ft.):
35’ 35’ 35’ 35’ 35’ 35’ 35’ 35’ 35’ 35’ 35’ 35’ 35’ 35’

Land Use
Designations
Density
(Du Per
Acre):

Conservation 1/3
Rural 1/3
Limited
Service
1/1 - 1.5/1
Full Service 1/1 - 4/1
"generally consistent"
"conditionally consistent"
"inconsistent"
"not applicable"

As evidenced by the table above, the Future Land Use Plan Map and the existing Zoning
District regulations are fairly compatible. However, in order to fully implement the
policies associated with the Limited Service and Full Service Areas particularly with
respect to density and design criteria, the County anticipates revisions to the existing
overlay districts.
Appendices
A-15

APPENDIX F. FUTURE LAND USE PLAN COMPATIBILITY MATRIX

Table A-2 Consistency Review of Policies Suggesting Regulatory Action and Existing Zoning Districts and
Development Standards
POLICIES SUGGESTING REGULATORY ACTION A RA R RO1 RO2 RR GB C LBH LM HM PUD PRD RMF
POLICY PA1: Public access to the sound and ocean waters of
Currituck County is essential to the quality of life of residents
and visitors, as well as the economy of the area. The County
supports the establishment of ADDITIONAL PUBLIC AND
PRIVATE ACCESS opportunities to the waters of Currituck
County. (Also see Outer Banks Policy Section.)

POLICY PA2: The County supports MANY FORMS OF
“ACCESS” to the water, including scenic outlooks and
boardwalks, boat ramps, marinas and docks, fishing piers,
canoe and kayak launches, and other means of access.
Whenever possible, such facilities shall be designed to
accommodate the needs of handicapped individuals.

POLICY PA3: Properties owned by the County, State or other
cooperating public agencies shall be considered as special
opportunities for public access sites. MULTIPLE USE OF
APPROPRIATE SITES (e.g. utility station and public boat
ramp site) shall be encouraged.

POLICY PA4: The LOCATION OF PUBLIC ACCESS
SITES shall generally be determined by a rational
examination of the sound and ocean resource, the distribution
of existing access sites, and the availability of appropriate
new sites. In addition to advanced planning, however, the
County will remain open to any site that offers good shoreline
access for the public, as unforeseen opportunities may arise.

POLICY PA5: PUBLIC AND PRIVATE MARINAS offering
access to area waters should be encouraged when developed
in accordance with the CAMA specific use standards for
marinas (i.e. docks for more than 10 vessels). Marinas shall
not be approved, however, that are incompatible with nearby
land uses or whose designs fail to meet the environmental
quality and development standards of the County’s Unified
Development Ordinance.

POLICY PA6: MARINAS IN UPLAND LOCATIONS
generally shall be preferred over marinas in open water,
thereby better preserving the visual appearance of the
shoreline as well as avoiding the “consumption” of available
public trust surface waters.

POLICY PA7: Currituck County marina owners shall be
encouraged to participate in BEST PRACTICE OPERATING
PROGRAMS, such as the “Clean Marina” program sponsored
by the NC Division of Coastal Management and the NC
Marine Trades Services organization. The County encourages
marina operators to apply for grants that may be available to
help pay for pump-out facilities or other environmental
improvements.

POLICY PA8: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR BOAT
RAMPS AND/OR PARKING AREAS associated with public
access sites shall address, at a minimum, requirements for
stormwater runoff, water quality protections, aesthetic
concerns and adequate water depth at low tide.

POLICY PA9: Currituck County shall discourage
developments which would have the effect of “WALLING
OFF THE WATER”, thereby eliminating views to the water
from adjoining streets, roads, walkways and other public
spaces.

POLICY PA10: Opportunities for protecting or creating
public access shall be pursued when drafting and
administering development standards for ocean front and
sound front projects in the County.

Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan

A-16

POLICIES SUGGESTING REGULATORY ACTION A RA R RO1 RO2 RR GB C LBH LM HM PUD PRD RMF
POLICY ES1: New development shall be permitted to locate
only in areas with SUITABLE SOIL and where ADEQUATE
INFRASTRUCTURE is available. For existing development
located on poor soils, and where sewage treatment upgrades
are necessary, engineering solutions may be supported,
provided that environmental concerns are fully addressed.

POLICY ES2: NON-COASTAL WETLANDS, including
FRESHWATER SWAMPS, AND INLAND, NON-TIDAL
WETLANDS, shall be conserved for the important role they
play in absorbing floodwaters, filtering pollutants from
stormwater runoff, recharging the ground water table, and
providing critical habitat for many plant and animal species.
Currituck County supports the efforts of the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers in protecting such wetlands through the Section
404 permit program of the Clean Water Act, as well as
Section 401water quality certifications by the State of North
Carolina.

POLICY ES3: COASTAL WETLANDS shall be conserved
for the valuable functions they perform in protecting water
quality and in providing critical habitat for the propagation
and survival of important plant and animal species. CAMA
use standards and policies for coastal wetlands shall be
supported. Uses approved for location in a coastal wetland
must be water dependent (i.e. utility easements, bridges,
docks and piers) and be developed so as to minimize adverse
impacts.

POLICY ES4: In approving new developments, Currituck
County shall support the retention or creation of a vegetated
buffer area along ESTUARINE SHORELINES as a simple,
effective and low-cost means of preventing pollutants from
entering estuarine waters. Exceptions to this requirement may
include developments involving pre-existing man-made
features such as hardened shorelines, ditches, and canals.
Farming and forestry operations that abide by appropriate
“best management practices” are also exempt. The County
also supports CAMA use standards for all COASTAL
SHORELINES, whether estuarine or otherwise.

POLICY ES5: Uses allowed in ESTUARINE WATERS must
be water dependent (public access, docks, piers, erosion
control, and other CAMA-approved uses) and must not
interfere with the proper function, cleanliness, salinity, and
circulation of the resource. FLOATING HOMES shall not be
approved for placement in the estuarine waters of Currituck
County. (Also see the Public Access section of this plan for
policies concerning new MARINAS.)

POLICY ES6: The location and design of piers and docks
shall not unduly interfere with the rights of the public to the
free and unobstructed use of PUBLIC TRUST WATERS for
navigation, fishing, and other uses. Efforts to limit the length
of piers into public trust waters shall be supported.

POLICY ES7: MARITIME FORESTS and SAND DUNES
shall receive a high level of environmental protection and
special consideration when reviewing public and private
sector development proposals in Currituck County.

POLICY ES8: Areas of the County identified for significant
future growth shall avoid NATURAL HERITAGE AREAS
(e.g. Great Marsh on Knotts Island, Currituck Banks/Swan
Island Natural Area, Currituck Banks Corolla Natural Area,
Pine Island/Currituck Club Natural Area, Northwest River
Marsh Game Land, and many other marsh areas on the
mainland.)

POLICY AG1: ACTIVE AGRICULTURAL LANDS having
a high productive potential, and especially those removed
from infrastructure and services, should be conserved for
continued agricultural use.

Appendices
A-17

POLICIES SUGGESTING REGULATORY ACTION A RA R RO1 RO2 RR GB C LBH LM HM PUD PRD RMF
POLICY AG2: Farms and woodlands shall be recognized as
an integral part of the county’s OPEN SPACE SYSTEM.
Efforts to keep these areas viable as part of the area’s
resource-based economic sector, shall be encouraged.

POLICY AG3: County ACTIONS CONCERNING
INFRASTRUCTURE (e.g. schools, parks, and utilities) and
regulations shall serve to direct new development first to
targeted growth areas near existing settlements identified as
Full Service Areas on the Future Land Use Map, rather than
“leapfrogging” to locations in the midst of farmland and
greenspace identified as Rural and Conservation areas on the
Future Land Use Map.

POLICY AG4: County growth management tools, including
particularly zoning, should provide PROTECTION TO
AGRICULTURE and other RESOURCE BASED
ACTIVITIES from incompatible land uses, such as a
residential subdivision in the midst of generally uninterrupted
farm land.

POLICY AG5: The County encourages beneficial programs
(farmland preservation trust fund, conservation easements,
purchase or transfer of development rights, farmland
preservation districts, etc.) that encourage VOLUNTARY
PROPERTY OWNER STEWARDSHIP of valuable farm and
open space areas for future generations.

POLICY AG6: For areas experiencing intense development
pressure, new residential development may be allowed to
locate in COMPACT, VILLAGE-LIKE CLUSTERS,
PREFERABLY NEAR EXISTING, NON-AGRICULTURAL
ACTIVITIES AND SERVICES, or in other locations that will
not interfere with resource production activities. Overall
density shall remain very low, with permanent open space,
dedicated during the development review process,
surrounding such clusters of homes.

POLICY HN1: Currituck County shall encourage
development to occur at densities appropriate for the location.
LOCATION AND DENSITY FACTORS shall include
whether the development is within an environmentally
suitable area, the type and capacity of sewage treatment
available to the site, the adequacy of transportation facilities
providing access to the site, and the proximity of the site to
existing and planned urban services. For example, projects
falling within the Full Services areas of the Future Land Use
Map would be permitted a higher density because of the
availability of infrastructure as well as similarity to the
existing development pattern. Such projects could be
developed at a density of two (2) or more dwelling units per
acre. Projects within areas designated as Limited Service
would be permitted a density of one (1) to two (2) units per
acre depending upon the surrounding development pattern and
availability of resources. Projects within areas designated as
Rural or Conservation by the Future Land Use Plan would be
permitted a much lower density of 1 dwelling unit per 3 acres
because of the lack of infrastructure in the area, the existing
low density development pattern, and presence of
environmentally sensitive natural areas.

POLICY HN2: Currituck County recognizes that large-lot
mini-estates (i.e. 5 to 10 acres) consume large amounts of
land, often without economic purpose. Estate lots having no
relationship to agriculture or other resource-based activities
promote sprawl and make the provision of infrastructure and
services very costly. The County shall therefore encourage
alternatives to large lot developments through INNOVATIVE
DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS AND CORRESPONDING
ZONING techniques.

POLICY HN3: Currituck County shall especially encourage
two forms of residential development, each with the objective
of avoiding traditional suburban sprawl:

Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan

A-18

POLICIES SUGGESTING REGULATORY ACTION A RA R RO1 RO2 RR GB C LBH LM HM PUD PRD RMF
1. OPEN SPACE DEVELOPMENTS that cluster homes
on less land, preserving permanently dedicated open
space and often employ on-site or community sewage
treatment. These types of developments are likely to
occur primarily in the Conservation, Rural, and to a
certain extent the Limited Service areas identified on the
Future Land Use Map.

2. COMPACT, MIXED USE DEVELOPMENTS or
DEVELOPMENTS NEAR A MIXTURE OF USES that
promote a return to balanced, self-supporting
community centers generally served by centralized
water and sewer. The types of development are
contemplated for the Full Service Areas identified on the
Future Land Use Map.

POLICY HN4: Currituck County shall discourage all forms of
housing from “LEAPFROGGING” INTO THE MIDST OF
FARMLAND and rural areas, thereby eroding the agricultural
resource base of the county.

POLICY HN5: Currituck County recognizes that there are
many types of housing, in addition to manufactured housing
(i.e. mobile homes), that are often overlooked in meeting the
AFFORDABLE HOUSING NEEDS of young families,
workers of modest income, senior citizens and others. To
encourage affordable housing other than just manufactured
housing, Currituck County may reserve appropriate areas of
the county for stick-built housing forms only, and other areas
of the county for accessory units in association with a
principal structure.

POLICY HN6: Currituck County recognizes the diversity of
HOUSING NEEDS FOR SENIOR CITIZENS including, but
not limited to, active adult retirement communities, assisted
living facilities, nursing homes, granny flats, and accessory
apartments within the principal structure of a home. The
County shall encourage a range of housing forms and costs to
meet a broad income spectrum.

POLICY HN7: The County shall encourage development
patterns and housing choices that allow for more COST-
EFFECTIVE TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS for those
citizens who cannot or choose not to drive, including senior
citizens, lower wage workers, handicapped persons, and the
young. Such a policy will also work to reduce traffic
congestion on the county’s already overburdened primary
road system.

POLICY HN8: To protect the County’s tax base and to ensure
the long-term viability of the County’s neighborhoods and
housing stock, the County will continue to enforce appropriate
CONSTRUCTION AND SITE DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS for residential developments. Such standards
may include, for example, that all homes have a permanent
masonry foundation (except where flood levels require
elevation) and a pitched roof and overhang, and that local
roads must be built to meet NCDOT acceptance standards.
(See Transportation Policies for details concerning
requirements for paved roads.)

POLICY HN9: Proposed residential development that would
expose residents to the harmful effects of INCOMPATIBLE
LAND USES or to ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS shall be
prohibited. This would include, for example, residential
development in locations adversely impacted by proximity to
the airport or to activities involving excessive noise, light,
odors, dust, fertilizers and insecticides (e.g. certain farm
operations, mining activities, etc.).

POLICY HN10: Currituck County shall not allow the
INAPPROPRIATE USE OF MANUFACTURED OR SITE
BUILT HOMES for storage, illegal occupancy or their
abandonment without proper disposal.

Appendices
A-19

POLICIES SUGGESTING REGULATORY ACTION A RA R RO1 RO2 RR GB C LBH LM HM PUD PRD RMF
POLICY CD1: NEIGHBORHOOD SERVING
COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS should be encouraged to locate
where a collector or secondary street intersects with a street of
equal or greater size. Appropriately designed, small-scale
businesses may also be near other neighborhood serving
facilities such as schools and parks.

POLICY CD2: Commercial and office development of greater
than a neighborhood scale shall be encouraged to cluster in
COMMERCIAL OR MIXED-USE CENTERS to curtail the
proliferation of strip development, and minimize traffic
generation.

POLICY CD3: LARGE COMMERCIAL CENTERS should
be located adjacent to the intersections of major roadways;
planned concentrations of employment and housing should be
encouraged to locate convenient to these centers.

POLICY CD4: HIGHWAY ORIENTED COMMERCIAL
USES should be clustered along segments of highways and
contain land uses which are mutually compatible and
reinforcing in use and design; they should be designed in such
a way as to minimize signage, access points, and to prevent
unsightly, dysfunctional STRIP DEVELOPMENT. (See esp.,
Policy CD9 below concerning connected parking areas.)

POLICY CD5: Incompatible or poorly planned
COMMERCIAL ENCROACHMENT within or immediately
adjoining existing residential areas shall be prohibited. Such
incompatible encroachments often include, but are not limited
to, large-scale commercial uses or automobile-oriented
commercial uses such as service stations, car lots, car washes,
drive through restaurants, and the like. (Also see Policy HN9)

POLICY CD6: Appropriate OFFICE AND
INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT, such as professional
offices, small churches, individual medical offices, and the
like, shall be encouraged to locate as a transitional land use
between residential areas and commercial or industrial
activities of higher intensity. “Activities of higher intensity”
are typically large-scale commercial uses or automobile-
oriented commercial development but may also include major
thoroughfares.

POLICY CD7: Attractive, environmentally beneficial
LANDSCAPING shall be provided by new commercial or
office developments, and in the rehabilitation and upgrading
of existing developments. Appropriate BUFFERING or other
effective DESIGN FEATURES may be employed to allow
less intensive forms of commercial and office development to
adjoin existing or planned residential uses.

POLICY CD8: MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENTS, properly
planned from the outset, which allow for a compatible
mixture of residential and non-residential uses with a
pedestrian scale and design, are encouraged. Similarly,
businesses may be located adjoining (and therefore
convenient to) an existing residential area, when such
businesses can be shown to satisfy design considerations
similar to a newly planned, pedestrian-scaled, mixed use
development.

POLICY CD9: Businesses shall be encouraged to coordinate
their SITE DESIGNS with other nearby businesses. Design
factors should include, at a minimum, shared or connected
parking and access, convenient pedestrian and vehicular
movement, and consistent sign standards.

POLICY ID1: To diversify the local economy and broaden
the local tax base, the County shall encourage a public service
and regulatory environment conducive to COMPATIBLE
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT. “Compatible” shall be
defined as, among other things, industries that do not
adversely impact the environmental quality of the area, or
overburden the local infrastructure.

Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan

A-20

POLICIES SUGGESTING REGULATORY ACTION A RA R RO1 RO2 RR GB C LBH LM HM PUD PRD RMF
POLICY ID2: Industrial uses should not be located in areas
that would diminish the desirability of existing and planned
NON-INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS, nor shall
incompatible non-industrial uses be allowed to encroach upon
existing or planned industrial sites.

POLICY ID3: Industrial development shall be located on land
that is physically suitable and has unique locational
advantages for industry. Advanced planning for the
identification of such land shall be encouraged. Designation
of “CERTIFIED” INDUSTRIAL SITES shall be especially
pursued.

POLICY ID4: LIGHT OR LOW IMPACT INDUSTRIAL
USES may be located in or near existing built up areas (other
than residential) to take advantage of available services and to
minimize home to work distances. Light industry is generally
considered a "manufacturing activity that uses moderate
amounts of partially processed materials to produce items of
relatively high value per unit weight". Such industries tend to
require less space for production, are generally more
environmentally friendly, and produce goods targeted toward
consumers rather than businesses. Examples light industrial
uses include research and development facilities, warehousing
and distribution, and manufacturing of office or household
goods. Careful design and/or buffering shall be required to
ensure compatibility with surrounding areas and to create a
positive image along area roadways.

POLICY ID5: WAREHOUSING, STORAGE AND
DISTRIBUTION facilities shall have access to thoroughfares
of adequate traffic carrying capacity, and shall be
appropriately designed and/or visually buffered according to
the visibility of their location.

POLICY ID6: New industrial development shall be
encouraged to locate in existing and/or planned
INDUSTRIAL PARKS.

POLICY ID7: Facilities for the disposal of HAZARDOUS
WASTE, whether chemical, biological, radioactive or other,
shall not be located in Currituck County. Neither shall
Currituck County accept SOLID WASTE FROM OUTSIDE
THE COUNTY for disposal at any site inside the county.

POLICY ID8: MINING ACTIVITIES, or secondary impacts
of mining activities not subject to permit approval by the State
of North Carolina, may be subject to review and management
by Currituck County. Activities to be addressed may include,
but not be limited to, the adequacy of roads serving the mine
site, visual impacts during operation and after closing of the
mine site, noise and dust considerations, etc.

POLICY ID9: Currituck County shall not support the
exploration or development of ENERGY PRODUCING
FACILITIES within its jurisdiction including, but not limited
to, oil and natural gas wells, and associated staging,
transportation, refinement, processing or on-shore service and
support facilities.

POLICY TR1: Opportunities to enhance REGIONAL
TRANSPORTATION CONNECTIONS between Currituck
County and other parts of the state and region shall be
supported. The County shall actively participate in regional
transportation planning efforts.

POLICY TR2: Transportation planning shall be employed to
promote a HIERARCHICAL, FUNCTIONAL
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM and to promote the proper
arrangement of land patterns by controlling the location and
appropriate use of streets, highways, trails, and other modes
of transportation. Generally, the design of major roads should
give first priority to moving traffic, while smaller roads may
give greater emphasis to serving adjoining land uses.

Appendices
A-21

POLICIES SUGGESTING REGULATORY ACTION A RA R RO1 RO2 RR GB C LBH LM HM PUD PRD RMF
POLICY TR3: A program of improvements and maintenance
to maximize the FUNCTIONAL LIFE OF EXISTING
ROADWAYS shall be endorsed as a cost effective and
environmentally sound means of meeting area transportation
needs.

POLICY TR4: ACCESS TO THE COUNTY’S MAJOR
ROADWAYS shall be managed so as to preserve the intended
purpose of the highway, protect taxpayer dollars invested, and
minimize hazardous turning movements in and out of traffic
flows. Methods may include, for example, limits on the
frequency of driveway cuts, shared driveway access,
minimum lot frontages, connections between adjoining
parking lots, central medians, etc.

POLICY TR5: So as to preserve the traffic moving function
of the County’s primary roads, minimize traffic accidents and
avoid land locking interior land parcels, Currituck County
shall discourage RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL
STRIP DEVELOPMENT along the county’s primary roads.
FLAG LOTS shall not be permitted along designated roads
unless justified by unusual or unforeseeable parcel or
topographic constraints.

POLICY TR6: HIGHWAY 158/168 shall receive special
attention concerning the proper development of land and
properties adjoining and/or accessing this critical arterial.

POLICY TR7: A system of LOCAL CONNECTOR ROADS
shall be identified and implemented to allow local traffic to
move in a north-south direction without having to use and
further burden US 158.

POLICY TR8: Local streets shall be designed and built to
allow for convenient CIRCULATION WITHIN AND
BETWEEN NEIGHBORHOODS and to encourage mobility
by pedestrians and bicyclists. Care shall be taken to encourage
local street “connectivity” without creating opportunities for
cut-through traffic from outside the connected areas.

POLICY TR9: BIKEWAY FACILITIES shall be encouraged
as energy-efficient, healthful, and environmentally sound
alternatives to the automobile. The inclusion of bikeways,
sidewalks, trails, and other alternatives to the automobile shall
be encouraged in both public and private developments.

POLICY TR10: Designs for all future road construction and
improvements shall consider opportunities for the inclusion of
BIKE LANES within the project. Particular attention should
be given to priority bikeway facility needs as submitted for
inclusion in the State Transportation Improvement Program.

POLICY TR11: ACCESS TO HIGHER INTENSITY
DEVELOPMENT shall generally not be permitted through an
area of lower intensity development. For example, access to a
multi-family development, a major park facility or other large
traffic generator shall not be permitted through a local street
serving a single-family residential neighborhood.

POLICY TR12: New residential developments shall provide
for the installation of PAVED PUBLIC ROADWAY AND
DRAINAGE INFRASTRUCTURE at the time of
development. This policy is intended to prevent the creation
of substandard developments that must later correct for
infrastructure problems that could have been avoided, had
they been installed properly from the beginning. Family
subdivisions and non-asphalt roads serving the northern
beaches are the only exceptions to this policy.

Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan

A-22

POLICIES SUGGESTING REGULATORY ACTION A RA R RO1 RO2 RR GB C LBH LM HM PUD PRD RMF
POLICY TR13: A new MID-COUNTY BRIDGE between the
mainland and Corolla shall be supported to provide critical
traffic relief to US 158, to improve emergency access to and
evacuation from the Currituck Outer Banks, to promote
economic development, and to provide better access to public
and private services not readily available on the Outer Banks.
To protect the character of communities near the bridge (e.g.
Aydlett, Churches Island, Poplar Branch), the road leading to
the bridge shall have no access points before its intersection
with US 158.

POLICY TR14: Plans for IMPROVEMENTS TO NC 12 shall
be an integral part of the planning for the management of
traffic to and from the Currituck Outer Banks.

POLICY TR15: NCDOT officials have determined that NC
168 would need to be widened to 7 lanes to accommodate
projected traffic volumes in 2016. To avoid this, Currituck
County shall continue to lobby for the construction of a NEW
NC 168 (MOYOCK) BYPASS.

POLICY TR16: The CURRITUCK SOUND FERRY
SYSTEM shall continue to be supported as an essential
transportation service between the mainland and Knotts Island
and the mainland and Corolla.

POLICY TR17: Currituck County is not served by an
interstate highway. The relative remoteness of the County
makes it attractive for many, inconvenient for others. The
CURRITUCK COUNTY AIRPORT shall continue to be
supported as an important means of alternative transportation
for those traveling greater distances.

POLICY TR18: The operational success of existing and
future TRANSIT SERVICES shall be supported through the
encouragement of some compact, transit-sensitive
developments. Recommendations for area transportation
improvements shall recognize public and private transit as an
integral part of the transportation system.

POLICY WS1: Currituck County shall support a variety of
means of obtaining potable water for the county, thereby
keeping open MULTIPLE OPTIONS FOR FUTURE
WATER SUPPLIES. These options may include ground
water from shallow and deep aquifers, surface water sources
(if available), and cooperative arrangements with other public
and private sources. Treatment may be conventional, reverse
osmosis or other innovative methods.

POLICY WS2: Currituck County may support efforts to
REGIONALIZE AND INTERCONNECT WATER SUPPLY
SYSTEMS. The benefits may include (1) lower capital
investment and operating costs per capita, (2) improved
ability to meet stricter water quality standards, (3) rate
structures which balance and equalize customer charges
throughout the region, and (4) the flexibility to shift supplies,
better control groundwater pumping and share capacity during
periods of high demand or limited supply.

POLICY WS3: Currituck County endorses UTILITIES
EXTENSION POLICIES that focus water and sewer services
(1) within existing developed areas and in nearby targeted
growth areas identified as Full Service and Limited Service
areas, (2) where development densities would make the
provision of all public services more efficient, (3) where the
land is particularly well suited for development and (4) away
from environmentally sensitive areas, such as areas with
extensive wetlands or the northern beaches of the Outer
Banks.

Appendices
A-23

POLICIES SUGGESTING REGULATORY ACTION A RA R RO1 RO2 RR GB C LBH LM HM PUD PRD RMF
POLICY WS4: Currituck County endorses utilities extension
policies that avoid those parts of the county best suited for
agriculture and to PROTECT FARMLAND FROM
DEVELOPMENT PRESSURES brought about by such
utilities. Exceptions to this policy may include extensions for
major economic development initiatives, and extensions to
address imminent public health problems or related
environmental hazards.

POLICY WS5: Currituck County may ASSIST IN THE
EXPENSE OF EXTENDING WATER AND SEWER
services when such assistance (1) will result in the
development of desirable new or expanded industry and the
creation of permanent jobs in numbers commensurate with the
expenditure required, (2) will result in a positive payback to
the county’s taxpayers, in terms of the taxes generated by the
new industry versus the costs incurred, (3) would not
otherwise be provided, potentially playing a critical role in a
location decision by the prospective industry, and would not
result in a significant degradation of environmental quality.

POLICY WS6: Currituck County endorses the proper use and
maintenance of APPROVED SEPTIC SYSTEMS in suitable
soils as an environmentally acceptable means of treating and
dispersing waste from low-density development.

POLICY WS7: Currituck County allows for the appropriate
use of PACKAGE SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS as a
means of achieving more efficient land use, while properly
disposing of waste. Such systems shall have a permanent
organizational ownership to guarantee their proper
management, including operation, maintenance and
replacement needs. Depending on their location in the county,
such systems may be required to have a design that allows for
assimilation into a centralized system at a future date.

POLICY WS8: CENTRAL AND PACKAGE TREATMENT
PLANTS shall be designed using best available technology to
eliminate or reduce odors. In addition, such plants shall be
properly located so as not to adversely impact nearby land
uses.

POLICY SF1: Currituck County shall support and actively
engage in ADVANCED PLANNING FOR THE LOCATION
OF NEW SCHOOLS. Such locations shall serve to reinforce
contiguous growth patterns near existing developments rather
than promoting sprawl in more rural locations. New schools
shall be viewed as a cornerstone of the communities in which
they are located and shall serve to proactively influence
growth.

POLICY SF2: Currituck County encourages OFFERS OF
LAND FOR THE SITING OF NEW SCHOOLS, particularly
in conjunction with related community development.
Acceptance of such properties shall be based on approved
location and design criteria.

POLICY SF3: Site planning for TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
AND SAFETY IN THE VICINITY OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS
shall be a priority.

POLICY SF4: Currituck County shall continue to support a
service level policy for schools that calls for the construction
and maintenance of classroom space sufficient to AVOID
THE USE OF MOBILE CLASSROOMS.

POLICY PR1: Future park development and open space
preservation shall provide for the rational DISTRIBUTION
OF RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE opportunities within
the County.

POLICY PR2: In determining FUTURE SITES FOR PARK,
RECREATION AND WATER ACCESS FACILITIES,
multiple objectives for natural area conservation, visual
enhancement, preservation of cultural and historic resources,
and watershed and flood prone area protection shall be
considered.

Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan

A-24

POLICIES SUGGESTING REGULATORY ACTION A RA R RO1 RO2 RR GB C LBH LM HM PUD PRD RMF
POLICY PR3: Currituck County shall continue to work
cooperatively with the County school system to maximize the
use of RECREATION FACILITIES LOCATED AT PUBLIC
SCHOOL SITES, and to foster the joint development of
additional public park facilities at new public school sites.

POLICY PR4: The County shall seek to identify, plan for and
develop a system of OPEN SPACE GREENWAYS, HIKING
and BIKING TRAILS as opportunities may allow. The use of
(1) natural corridors such as streams and floodplains, and (2)
man-made corridors such as utility and transportation rights-
of-way and easements, shall be emphasized.

POLICY PR5: LAND ACQUISITION for new park,
recreation, and open space sites in advance of need shall be
encouraged to achieve desirable locations at cost effective
levels.

POLICY PR6: All new residential development shall provide
for ADEQUATE OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
IMPROVEMENTS including, as may be appropriate, funding
in proportion to the demand created by the development. The
amount of open space and improvements may be determined
according to the number of dwelling units in the development
and/or by a percentage of the total acreage in the
development. Fees in lieu of land dedication shall be based on
the inflation adjusted assessed value of the development or
subdivision for property tax purposes.

POLICY PR7: New park and recreation facilities, as well as
improvements to existing facilities, shall give special
consideration to the needs of HANDICAPPED PERSONS.

POLICY PR8: New mixed use developments, office and
business parks, and other non-residential areas shall be
encouraged to include WALKWAYS WITHIN THE
DEVELOPMENT.

POLICY SW1: Currituck County belongs to the Albemarle
Regional Solid Waste Management Authority. Local area
needs for solid waste collection and disposal shall continue to
be met through advanced, cooperative, REGIONAL
PLANNING between the County and other member
governments participating in the Authority.

POLICY SW2: The County shall continue to pursue a variety
of WASTE REDUCTION STRATEGIES, including waste
prevention, recycling and reuse.

POLICY SW3: Currituck County encourages residential
COMPOSTING AND MULCHING, as well as approved,
large-site processing and recycling of organic materials, yard
waste and storm debris in volume.

POLICY SW4: Currituck County supports EDUCATION and
activities that reduce litter and illegal dumping, foster clean
up of dumpsites, promote recycling and reuse, and encourage
participation in programs such as Adopt-A-Highway and the
Governors Litter Sweep.

POLICY SW5: Currituck County shall enforce harsh penalties
against those who would seek to DUMP TRASH
ILLEGALLY or improperly dispose of JUNKED CARS or
other debris.

POLICY SW6: Currituck County supports solid waste
program FINANCING STRATEGIES that reasonably assess
the costs of waste collection and disposal in accordance with
the amount of waste each generator produces, while at the
same time discouraging illegal dumping.

POLICY SW7: Currituck County waste
CONVENIENCE/COLLECTION AND RECYCLING
CENTERS shall continue to be designed, located, improved
and maintained to facilitate their use.

Appendices
A-25

POLICIES SUGGESTING REGULATORY ACTION A RA R RO1 RO2 RR GB C LBH LM HM PUD PRD RMF
POLICY SW8: Some portions of Currituck County may be
provided with DOOR TO DOOR TRASH PICK UP, based
upon the characteristics of each area and the most appropriate
means of assuring proper management of waste. The Corolla
area of the Outer Banks, with a highly transient rental
population, is an example of an area suitable for door-to-door
service. Knotts Island, which is far less transient and more
sparsely developed, is not.

POLICY PP1: The County shall support and actively engage
in LONG RANGE PLANNING AND BUDGETING FOR
CAPITAL FACILITIES, with particular emphasis on water
supply, public schools, parkland, storm water management
facilities, public safety buildings and equipment, and other
necessary facilities.

POLICY PP2: Currituck County shall continue to implement
a policy of ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES, sufficient to
support associated growth and development. Such facilities
may include but not be limited to water supply, school
capacity, park and open space needs, fire fighting capability,
and law enforcement.

POLICY PP3: The costs of infrastructure, facilities and
services (e.g. schools, parks, water supply, etc.) related to the
DEMAND CREATED BY NEW GROWTH AND
DEVELOPMENT shall be borne, in equitable proportion, by
those creating the additional demand. So as to lessen the
burden on the general property tax payer, this approach may
include a land transfer tax, impact fees on new development,
upzoning fees, and user fees for new facilities.

POLICY NH1: The County recognizes the risks to life and
property that exist within SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD
AREAS (i.e. areas having a 1% chance of flooding in any
year) that may be inundated during major storm events. The
County will continue taking measures to mitigate these risks
and will avoid taking any action in these areas that materially
increases risks to life and property.

POLICY NH2: The County shall require development and
redevelopment within SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS
to meet the standards of the National Flood Insurance
Program and the County’s Flood Damage Prevention
Ordinance. Particular attention shall be given to development
in VE (i.e. velocity wave) zones concerning standards for
breakaway walls, no land disturbing activities, and no
permanent enclosures below the base flood level.

POLICY NH3: New PUBLIC FACILITIES AND
STRUCTURES, as well as improvements to existing pubic
facilities and structures, shall be located and designed to
mitigate natural hazards. When placement in a natural hazard
area is unavoidable, compliance with the National Flood
Insurance Program and County Flood Damage Prevention
Ordinance shall be required.

POLICY NH4: The County shall periodically update and
enforce a HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN that addresses the
full range of natural hazards facing the county. Continuation
of the COBRA (Coastal Barriers Resource Act) zone,
particularly as applied to RO-2 zoned areas (Carova, off-road
area) of the county, shall continue to be supported. The plan
shall meet the standards of the NC Division of Emergency
Management and FEMA.

POLICY NH5: The County shall work in an on-going basis to
improve its COMMUNTIY RATNG SYSTEM (CRS)
SCORE to make the county safer and to reduce premiums for
Federal Flood Insurance.

POLICY NH6: The County shall make EMERGENCY
EVACUATION a priority in the development and approval of
transportation plans and improvements included in the NC
DOT Transportation Improvement Program.

Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan

A-26

POLICIES SUGGESTING REGULATORY ACTION A RA R RO1 RO2 RR GB C LBH LM HM PUD PRD RMF
POLICY NH7: Currituck County supports BEACH
PRESERVATION AND RESTORATION methods as
recommended by current research completed by the UNC Sea
Grant Program. Generally, non-hardened, and therefore less
environmentally damaging approaches to shoreline
stabilization, shall be preferred.

POLICY NH8: Currituck County encourages owners of
PROPERTIES ALONG ESTUARINE SHORELINES to
employ the least hardened approach to shoreline stabilization
(i.e. marsh grass favored over riprap favored over
bulkheading, etc.), provided that reasonable access is
available to install the technology available.

POLICY NH9: Currituck County encourages efforts to fully
inform prospective real estate purchasers of the inherent
SHORELINE EROSION RISKS associated with oceanfront
property.

POLICY NH10: The County will continue public education
efforts with respect to protecting property from hazards
particularly flood and wind damage as well as construction
requirements related to the NFIP.

POLICY WQ1: Currituck County’s GROUND WATER
RESOURCES shall receive a level of protection
commensurate with their enormous value. Efforts shall be
made to monitor the quantity and quality of groundwater
resources, with an eye toward preventing pollution, saltwater
intrusion, or excessive drawdowns. Particular attention shall
be given to locations near water and sewer treatment plants
and areas with concentrations of septic tanks.

POLICY WQ2: Currituck County supports periodic
reexamination of WATER QUALITY CLASSIFICATIONS
(SA, SB, SC, etc.) with the objective of not just sustaining the
status quo but, rather, seeking to achieve higher water quality
conditions and associated ratings whenever possible.

POLICY WQ3: Currituck County supports policies, plans and
actions that help protect the water quality of the county’s
estuarine system by preventing SOIL EROSION AND
SEDIMENTATION, and by controlling the quantity and
quality of STORMWATER RUNOFF entering the estuary.

POLICY WQ4: RUNOFF AND DRAINAGE from
development, forestry and agricultural activities shall be of a
quality and quantity as near to natural conditions as possible.
Post-development runoff shall not exceed pre-development
volumes.

POLICY WQ5: Development that preserves the NATURAL
FEATURES OF THE SITE, including existing topography
and significant existing vegetation, shall be encouraged.
COASTAL AND NON-COASTAL WETLANDS shall not be
considered part of a lot’s acreage for the purpose of
determining minimum lot size or development density. Open
space developments shall be encouraged to REDUCE
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREAS associated with new
development and redevelopment.

POLICY WQ6: Currituck County supports the retention or
preservation of VEGETATED BUFFERS along the edge of
drainage ways, streams and other components of the estuarine
system as an effective, low cost means of protecting water
quality.

POLICY WQ7: The environmental benefits of properly
designed, VEGETATED ROADSIDE DRAINAGE SWALES
shall be recognized. Curb and gutter shall be reserved to
developments that are urban in character (i.e. less than 10,000
square foot lot sizes) and that are served by adequate
stormwater collection, retention and slow release facilities.

Appendices
A-27

POLICIES SUGGESTING REGULATORY ACTION A RA R RO1 RO2 RR GB C LBH LM HM PUD PRD RMF
POLICY WQ8: Currituck County shall support the
development and maintenance of a countywide
COMPREHENSIVE DRAINAGE AND FLOOD
MANAGEMENT PLAN, including public and private actions
in support of plan implementation. Currituck County shall
support County, NCDOT and property owner cooperation in
preventing and resolving stormwater problems.

POLICY WQ9: Currituck County supports the efforts of the
Currituck Soil and Water Conservation District and the
United States Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources
Conservation Service to assist farmers and timber operators in
the county in implementing BEST MANAGEMENT
PRACTICES to protect and improve water quality.

POLICY WQ10: SEWAGE TREATMENT DISCHARGES
shall not be permitted into the waters of Currituck County.
WATER TREATMENT DISCHARGES may be allowed if
such discharge would not cause significant degradation of
water quality (e.g. negatively affecting the fisheries resource).

POLICY ED1: NEW AND EXPANDING INDUSTRIES
AND BUSINESSES should be especially encouraged that: 1)
diversify the local economy, 2) train and utilize a more highly
skilled labor force, and (3) are compatible with the
environmental quality and natural amenity-based economy of
Currituck County.

POLICY ED2: CAPITAL EXPENDITURES for the purpose
of economic development shall be targeted toward areas that
are most suited for development. Targeted areas should
include raw land as well as the revitalization and reuse of
currently unused or underutilized structures, sites and
infrastructure. Targeted areas primarily include those located
within the Full Service Areas identified on the Future Land
Use Map and to a lesser extent those included in the Limited
Service Areas.

POLICY ED3: The County supports COORDINATION OF
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES among various
economic development agencies and encourages regional
cooperation and interaction among areas with shared
economic interests.

POLICY ED4: In addition to the recruitment and expansion of
major new industries, the considerable value of SMALL
BUSINESS START-UPS, EXPANSIONS AND SPIN-OFFS
shall also be recognized.

POLICY CA1: The important economic, tourism, and
community image benefits of attractive, functional MAJOR
HIGHWAY CORRIDORS through Currituck County shall be
recognized. Such highway corridors, beginning with US 158
and NC 168, shall receive priority attention for improved
appearance and development standards, including driveway
access, landscaping, buffering, signage, lighting and tree
preservation.

POLICY CA2: A CANOPY OF STREET TREES shall be
encouraged along all major highways in the County. This
canopy may be implemented through the preservation of
existing trees or the planting of trees that will reach
substantial size at maturity. The preservation or planting of
such trees shall be encouraged in the area immediately
adjoining the right of way.

POLICY CA3: LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS at existing
and new commercial developments, particularly as related to
breaking up and softening the appearance of expansive
parking areas, and absorbing storm water runoff, shall be
required.

POLICY CA4: SIGN POLICIES AND STANDARDS should
be established and periodically updated to enhance
community appearance and create a quality business image.
Such standards may be tailored to achieve different
development characters for different parts of the county.

Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan

A-28

POLICIES SUGGESTING REGULATORY ACTION A RA R RO1 RO2 RR GB C LBH LM HM PUD PRD RMF
POLICY CA5: Currituck County recognizes that an attractive,
less commercialized landscape, particularly along heavily
traveled land and water routes, is essential to the tourist-based
economy of the area. The placement of additional
BILLBOARDS AND OFF-SITE ADVERTISING SIGNS
shall not be permitted in Currituck County.

POLICY CA6: To foster an improved community appearance,
promote public safety, and help prevent service outages, the
placement of UTILITY WIRES UNDERGROUND shall be
encouraged in all public and private developments.

POLICY CA7: The County shall continue to monitor the
placement of COMMUNICATION AND OTHER TOWERS
in Currituck County, and shall take action as may be
determined necessary to regulate their design and location.

POLICY CA8: The County shall not permit the
INAPPROPRIATE USE OF MANUFACTURED OR SITE
BUILT HOMES for storage; nor shall abandonment be
permitted without proper maintenance or disposal/demolition.

POLICY CA9: The County shall not permit the establishment
and operation of UNLICENSED JUNKYARDS. Similarly,
JUNKED CARS shall not be permitted to remain in locations
visible from any public right of way.

POLICY CA10: Organize or facilitate a program whereby
JUNKED CARS MAY BE HAULED AWAY AND
RECYCLED at the least possible cost, if any, to the vehicle
owners.

POLICY CA11: LITTERING OF PUBLIC ROADSIDES,
SHORELINES AND OTHER PROPERTIES, whether from
individual “litterbugs”, illegal dumping, or drivers of
inadequately covered trucks, shall not be tolerated. The
County supports programs that prevent litter, clean up
roadsides and shorelines, as well as fines that hold
accountable those who would abuse the environment and
denigrate the image of the area.

POLICY HP1: Local efforts to identify, designate and
preserve SITES, BUILDINGS AND DISTRICTS OF
PARTICULAR HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE shall be
supported.

POLICY HP2: Multiple and appropriate ADAPTIVE REUSE
OF HISTORIC RESOURCES shall be encouraged.
POLICY HP3: Development of the TOURISM AND
EDUCATIONAL POTENTIAL of the area's architectural,
historic and cultural resources shall be encouraged.

POLICY HP4: The DESTRUCTION OF SIGNIFICANT
ARCHITECTURAL, HISTORIC AND
ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES in the planning area
shall be discouraged.

POLICY HP5: DEVELOPMENT SITES CONTAINING
SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC RESOURCES shall be
encouraged to honor such resources within the design of their
development proposals. Opportunities may include, for
example, incorporating such resources into common open
space, donating such areas for tax credits, or making such
areas available for acquisition and preservation.

POLICY HP6: Economic development efforts shall encourage
the REVITALIZATION AND REUSE of currently unused or
underutilized structures, sites and infrastructure in
appropriately located areas.

POLICY HP7: The County, working in cooperation with non-
profit groups and private organizations, shall seek to maintain
and restore the architectural and cultural HERITAGE OF
VARIOUS “COMMUNITIES” in Currituck County.

POLICY PS1: As the area grows, the County may establish
strategically located SUBSTATIONS FOR PUBLIC
SAFETY SERVICES (i.e. law enforcement, fire fighting and
rescue), provided that sufficient resources can be made
available to properly staff and equip them.

Appendices
A-29

POLICIES SUGGESTING REGULATORY ACTION A RA R RO1 RO2 RR GB C LBH LM HM PUD PRD RMF
POLICY PS2: Currituck County shall support and encourage
the development and improvement of FIRE FIGHTING
SERVICES that enhance the security and safety of life and
property, while resulting in the added benefit of lower
property insurance rates. The need for additional fire stations
or improvements to existing fire stations shall be examined
annually to keep pace with the growth of the area.

POLICY ML1: Currituck County recognizes the particular
interest of residents and property owners in the Mainland
Area in PRESERVING FARMLAND AND OPEN SPACE.
The County shall exercise diligence in applying policies,
plans and actions that will encourage compact growth and the
preservation of farmland and open space in the Mainland
Area.

POLICY ML2: Currituck County supports efforts to establish
a modern INDUSTRIAL PARK in the Mainland Area,
developed in accordance with State approved standards and
certifications.

POLICY ML3: The interests of Mainland Area residents in
having ACCESS TO THE AREA’S OCEAN AND
ESTUARINE WATERS shall be fostered through County
actions to increase the number of additional public access
sites at a rate commensurate with the population growth of the
Currituck County. Included in the actions taken to increase
public access shall be a consideration given to transportation
needs, including boat docks and ferry services.

POLICY ML4: Currituck County recognizes that the
appearance and traffic moving function of the NC 168/ US
158 CORRIDOR is of exceptional importance to both the near
term quality of life and long-term economic prospects for
residents and property owners in the Mainland Area. The
Transportation and Community Appearance policy sections of
this plan shall be implemented to give priority to this issue.

POLICY OB1: Currituck County supports the provision of
INFRASTRUCTURE (e.g. potable water) AND SERVICES
(e.g. law enforcement officers) adequate to meet basic quality
of life and public health and safety requirements of residents
on the Outer Banks, while at the same not stimulating
inappropriate intensive development in environmentally
fragile, hazardous barrier island areas.

POLICY OB2: So as to minimize COMMERCIAL STRIP
DEVELOPMENT and maximize the traffic moving capability
of NC 12, Currituck County shall encourage commercial
development to cluster at appropriate locations rather than
dispersing along NC 12.

POLICY OB3: Currituck County recognizes that, on the
Outer Banks in particular, “single family” homes are being
built that accommodate 15, 20, 25 or more people. Thus, these
LARGE RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES are circumventing
existing zoning laws that could not anticipate the advent of
these building forms. Development regulations and project
approvals shall therefore be based upon the actual nature of
the structure rather than the label (e.g. single family) that may
be attached to it.

POLICY OB4: Currituck County supports policies and
actions that require the square footage, number of bedrooms,
and/or occupancy levels of RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES
to be determined in proportion to lot size, as well as public
health and safety issues concerning water supply and sewage
disposal, fire safety, emergency services, parking, traffic loads
during evacuations, etc.

POLICY OB5: Currituck County, through its actions and
decisions, shall seek to preserve the historic character and
heritage of the COROLLA VILLAGE area of the Outer
Banks.

Currituck County 2006 Land Use Plan

A-30

POLICIES SUGGESTING REGULATORY ACTION A RA R RO1 RO2 RR GB C LBH LM HM PUD PRD RMF
POLICY OB6: Concerning the OFF-ROAD AREAS OF THE
OUTER BANKS, Currituck County shall not permit or
encourage the provision of growth-inducing facilities and
services to these areas, including for example, commercial
services, centralized sewage treatment and hard surface roads.

POLICY OB7: VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE NORTH
BEACHES (off-road area) shall not compromise the
environmental integrity of wildlife refuges, the estuarine
research reserve, other ecologically sensitive areas, or habitat
for wild horses. Structures or other man-made improvements
not specifically serving the public interest shall not be
permitted to block vehicular access along the beach.

POLICY OB8: In order to protect WILD HORSES, Currituck
County shall not permit nor encourage the provision of hard
surface roads in the off-road area of Carova.

POLICY OB9: LARGE HOMES ON OCEANFRONT LOTS
IN THE OFF-ROAD AREA should be located as far west as
possible. Structures should not be built forward of protective
dunes, thereby impeding dune recovery. County minimum
setbacks may exceed CAMA minimum setbacks in ocean
erodible areas.

POLICY KI1: The need for ACCESS TO PUBLIC TRUST
WATERS in the Knotts Island area shall be met through
periodic improvements to existing public facilities. The
County also recognizes that private sector facilities may play
a role in satisfying access needs to the water.

POLICY KI2: Currituck County shall encourage NCDOT
efforts to provide essential maintenance and improvements to
ROADS AND ROADSIDE DITCHES serving the Knotts
Island Area, especially including the Marsh Causeway Bridge.

POLICY KI3: Currituck County shall support efforts to
improve community services in the Knotts Island area.
Services which may warrant improvement include: (1) FIRE
SERVICE, to address fire safety as well as reducing insurance
costs and (2) COMMUNICATIONS following major storm
events (3) access to LIBRARY SERVICES, and (4) access to
INDOOR RECREATION facilities.

POLICY KI4: Currituck County shall not provide or
encourage the provision of INFRASTRUCTURE OR
UTILITIES that would foster greater development densities
on Knotts Island, including particularly, centralized sewage
treatment services.

POLICY KI5: Land use and zoning initiatives on Knotts
Island shall give consideration to limiting
MANUFACTURED HOME (I.E. MOBILE HOME)
PLACEMENTS in this part of the county.

"generally consistent"
"conditionally consistent"
"inconsistent"
"not applicable

As illustrated by the table above, the policies included in the Land Use Plan are by and large
consistent with existing County regulations. There are some notable exceptions primarily related
to transportation concerns, architectural standards, and overall site design criteria. The County
anticipates consideration of ordinance amendments to address those inconsistencies.

APPENDIX G - Infrastructure AnalysisTable A-3 Current ConditionsLAND CLASSIFICATIONConservationRuralLimited ServiceAPPROXIMATE LEVEL OF INTENSITY AND DENSITYIn general the most environmentally sensitive areas of the County. Majority is already protected by existing federal, state, and local regulations. Minimal single-family residential development at 1DU/3 Acres. Lot coverage limited to 30% and building height limited to 35 ft. Minimum lo size - 3 acresGenerally used for very low density residential development (1DU/3 Acres). Primarily in agricultural production or forestry. Nonresidential uses generally include services related to the farming industry. Lot coverage 30% and building height limited to 35 ft. Minimum lot size 3 acresGenerally low density residential development (1DU/Acre); single-family detached dwellings on a minimum 20,000 square foot lot. Generally 30% lot coverage, 35' building height.Nonresidential uses concentrated along the major corridors. Minimum lot size 20,000 with 30% lot coverage and maximum 35 ft. building height. Maximum lot coverage for nonresidential limited to 65% with 35 ft. height limit.1WASTEWATER/ WATER INFRASTRUCTURE (estimated at 200 gallons per day per household)Served by individual on-site water and wastewater.Served by individual water and wastewaterSewer Services in the Mainland SubareaCarolina Village MHP (60,000 gpd capacity)Moyock Commons Shopping Center (40,000 gpd capacity)Mill Run / Eagle Creek (350,000 gpd capacity)Maple PrisonNew Town Sewer System (CDBG Grant) (15,000 gpd capacity)Water Service Mainland - In 2002, there were 3,914 metered connections, 1% (10) of the connections was institutional, 7% (289) of the connections were commercial, and the remaining 92% (3,615) were residential. 2TRANSPORTATIONGenerally served by rural state maintained and private roads. Least traffic generation and therefore the highest level of service. Generally served by rural state maintained and private roads. Least traffic generation and therefore the highest level of service. Area is served primarily by major collectors and arterials including Tulls Creek Road, Aydlett Road, NC 168, and US 158. Level of Service is compromised primaily in the southern end of the County and on the Outer Banks during the peak tourist season.SCHOOLS (Using national averages for school age student generation, one can expect .4243 elementary students, .084 middle school students and .1568 high school students per household). It is essential to remember that all of these students will not be entering the school system at one time.RECREATION (using a standard of 15 acres per 1,000 residents)1The creation of this scenario is for an interim analysis only. Conditions may be different pending future development and redevelopment. 2Level of Service (LOS) Data was unaviable for this analysis.Page G-1
APPENDIX G - Infrastructure AnalysisTable A-3 Current ConditionsLAND CLASSIFICATIONAPPROXIMATE LEVEL OF INTENSITY AND DENSITY1WASTEWATER/ WATER INFRASTRUCTURE (estimated at 200 gallons per day per household)2TRANSPORTATIONSCHOOLS (Using national averages for school age student generation, one can expect .4243 elementary students, .084 middle school students and .1568 high school students per household). It is essential to remember that all of these students will not be entering the school system at one time.RECREATION (using a standard of 15 acres per 1,000 residents)1The creation of this scenario is for an interim analysis only. Conditions may be different pending future development and redevelopment. 2Level of Service (LOS) Data was unaviable for this analysis.Full ServiceMoyock AreaShawboro/CrawfordGenerally low to medium density residential uses (1DU/Acre on the Mainland, 3 DUs/Acre in Corolla, and 120,000 sq.ft. lots in Carova). In both Carova and on the Mainland, there are some smaller previously platted lots. Primarily single-family detached dwellings with a small amount of attached and multi-family. Generally 30% lot coverage, 35' building height. Non residential uses generally located along the major corridors of NC168, US 158, and NC 12. Minimum lot size ~20,000 sq. ft.with 30% lot coverage and maximum 35 ft. building heigh with smaller lot sizes in PUDs on the Outer Banks. Maximum lot coverage for nonresidential limited to 65% with 35 ft. height limit.Development densities currently range from 1 to 3 units per acre depending upon development type on lots ranging from 20,000 sq. ft. to 1 acre. The area is coming under increasing development pressure as a “bedroom community” for the Tidewater Area of Virginia. Heightened development interest in this area has brought with it pressure for more subdivisions, as well as the retail services that follow such development. Nonresidential uses are primarily service and retail based. 2000 Census population 4,647. Minimum lot size 20,000 with 30% lot coverage and maximum 35 ft. building height. Maximum lot coverage for nonresidential limited to 65% with 35 ft. height limit.Predominantly rural; contains some of the best, most extensive agricultural lands in the county. Current development density is 1 unit per 3 acres; primarily single-family detached structures on 3 acre lots. 2000 census population 1,662. Lot coverage 30% and building height limited to 35 ft. Minimum lot size 3 acres. Maximum lot coverage for nonresidential limited to 65% with 35 ft. height limit.Sewer Services in the Mainland SubareaCarolina Village MHP (60,000 gpd capacity)Moyock Commons Shopping Center (40,000 gpd capacity)Mill Run / Eagle Creek (350,000 gpd capacity)Maple PrisonNew Town Sewer System (CDBG Grant) (15,000 gpd capacity)Water Service Mainland - In 2002, there were 3,914 metered connections, 1% (10) of the connections was institutional, 7% (289) of the connections were commercial, and the remaining 92% (3,615) were residential. The developing area of Moyock is served by County water. The area is still largely served by individual on-site septic however there are some individual developments served by community wastewater systems (Moyock Commons, Eagle Creek). Estimated water and wastewater flow ~ 356,000 gpdSome areas are served by County water however the majority of development in the area is served by individual on-site water and septic. Estimated water and wastewater flow ~ 127,000 gpdArea is served primarily by major collectors and arterials including Tulls Creek Road, Aydlett Road, NC 168, and US 158. Level of Service is compromised primaily in the southern end of the County and on the Outer Banks during the peak tourist season. Connectivity and pedestrian circulation is lacking.Major thoroughfares include NC 168 and Tulls Creek Road. NC 168 was recently improved to 5 lanes. Connectivity among developments and pedestrian circulation are limited. Level of service along the highway decreases during the height of the tourist season.Served by NC 34, US 158, and NC 168 as well as a system of rural local roads. Level of service is generally high.Elementary School Capacity - 1304; Remaining Seats --302Middle School Capacity - 1142; Remaining Seats - 80; High School Capacity - 1356; Reminaing Seats - -50Page G-2
APPENDIX G - Infrastructure AnalysisTable A-3 Current ConditionsLAND CLASSIFICATIONAPPROXIMATE LEVEL OF INTENSITY AND DENSITY1WASTEWATER/ WATER INFRASTRUCTURE (estimated at 200 gallons per day per household)2TRANSPORTATIONSCHOOLS (Using national averages for school age student generation, one can expect .4243 elementary students, .084 middle school students and .1568 high school students per household). It is essential to remember that all of these students will not be entering the school system at one time.RECREATION (using a standard of 15 acres per 1,000 residents)1The creation of this scenario is for an interim analysis only. Conditions may be different pending future development and redevelopment. 2Level of Service (LOS) Data was unaviable for this analysis.Courthouse AreaBarco/Coinjock/Airport AreaIntersection of Proposed Mid-County Bridge and US Highway 158The Courthouse area of the mainland has been the traditional governmental center of Currituck County. Development densities range from 1 to 2 units per acre on lots ranging from 20,000 sq. ft. to 40,000 sq. ft. In addition to the old original courthouse, the area also contains the new Currituck County Governmental Center, a fire/EMS station, an elementary school, other County offices, and the mainland ferry landing. Several small businesses also operate within the area. Estimated population ~1500. Minimum lot size 20,000 with 30% lot coverage and maximum 35 ft. building height. Maximum lot coverage for nonresidential limited to 65% with 35 ft. height limit.Sparsely developed (approximately 1 unit per acre) on lots averaging 40,000 sq. ft. This area also includes an elementary school, a middle school and a high school, the airport, the landfill/transfer station, the Sheriff’s office and jail, a County Park, a fire/EMS station, and a water treatment plant. A number of small businesses are also located within the area. Compared to many areas of the mainland, this area has a significant amount of land that is not in wetlands. 2,500. Minimum lot size 20,000 with 30% lot coverage and maximum 35 ft. building height. Maximum lot coverage for nonresidential limited to 65% with 35 ft. height limit. Largely undeveloped. Current development density is approximately 1 unit per acre on a mix of lot sizes. Highway 158 at this location runs along a relatively narrow, north-south running ridge of higher ground. Estimated populaiton ~ 1000. Minimum lot size 20,000 with 30% lot coverage and maximum 35 ft. building height. Maximum lot coverage for nonresidential limited to 65% with 35 ft. height limit.The area is served by County water and individual on-site septic. Estimated water and wastewater flow ~ 114,942 gpdServed by County water and individual on-site septic.County water generally available; served by individual on-site septic. The area is bisected by NC 168 and is served by a system of private and public local roads. Level of Service is compromised during the tourist season.At the intersection of US 158 and NC 168. As with most of the County the level of service is lower at specific times during the tourist season.Located along US 158 and the location of the intersection of the proposed Mid-County Bridge and US Highway 158. Elementary School Capacity - 565; Remaining Seats - -136Maple Park - 1 major pavilion with restrooms and grills 1 baseball/softball field; 1 tot lot playground; 4 gazebo picnic shelters with grills; 2 volleyball courts; 1 badminton court; 2 horseshoe pits; 1 fitness trail; 1 concrete walking trail; 1 skate park; also, horse trails, hiking trails, and a fishing lake Veterans' Memorial Park, located on the Intracoastal Waterway in Coinjockincludes: 1 pavilion (20'X28') with grills; 1 horseshoe pit; 1 waterfront boardwalk with fishing deck; also, a Veteran's Memorial with plaque and flags Page G-3
APPENDIX G - Infrastructure AnalysisTable A-3 Current ConditionsLAND CLASSIFICATIONAPPROXIMATE LEVEL OF INTENSITY AND DENSITY1WASTEWATER/ WATER INFRASTRUCTURE (estimated at 200 gallons per day per household)2TRANSPORTATIONSCHOOLS (Using national averages for school age student generation, one can expect .4243 elementary students, .084 middle school students and .1568 high school students per household). It is essential to remember that all of these students will not be entering the school system at one time.RECREATION (using a standard of 15 acres per 1,000 residents)1The creation of this scenario is for an interim analysis only. Conditions may be different pending future development and redevelopment. 2Level of Service (LOS) Data was unaviable for this analysis.Aydlett and Waterlily/Churches IslandGrandyThe communities of Aydlett, Waterlily and Churches Island offer some of the most attractive areas for development on the mainland of Currituck County. Situated atop an ancient, north-south running ridge of relatively high and dry ground, these areas directly abut the western shoreline of Currituck Sound, with very little intervening marsh. Home sites have panoramic views across the sound to the Outer Banks. It is not surprising, then, that these areas are among the most attractive for new residential development and redevelopment. In recent years, as the value of the land here has dramatically increased, older smaller homes have begun to be replaced by much larger structures. Existing zoning in these areas calls for 40,000 square foot lots or a density of 1 unit per acre. There is little or no commercial development in these areas. estimated population ~ 1000. Minimum lot size 20,000 with 30% lot coverage and maximum 35 ft. building height. Maximum lot coverage for nonresidential limited to 65% with 35 ft. height limit.Grandy is the second fastest growth area in Currituck County, second only to the Moyock area. Existing development density is approximately 1 to 2 units per acre with a fair amount of nonresidential development as well. Despite a fairly lengthy commute to the Outer Banks (compared to Point Harbor, for example), Grandy is nonetheless the home of many workers who provide services to the predominantly residential areas of the Outer Banks. Grandy is also emerging as a distinct service center in the southern part of mainland Currituck County, though not to the same degree as the Point Harbor area. Housing in the Grandy area is still relatively affordable, although escalating real estate prices throughout much of Currituck County threaten to place homes even in this area out of the reach of some workers. In addition, the advent of the proposed Mid-county Bridge will undoubtedly strengthen Grandy’s position as a service area for the Outer Banks of Currituck County. Estimated population ~ 2,500. Minimum lot size 20,000 with 30% lot coverage and maximum 35 ft. building height. Maximum lot coverage for nonresidential limited to 65% with 35 ft. height limit.County water generally available; served by individual on-site septic. County water generally available; served by individual on-site septic with some communities served by community sewer. Served by a system of local roads and minor collectors feeding into US 158.Served by a system of local roads and minor collectors feeding into US 158.Walnut Island Park, located at Walnut Island, GrandyIncludes: 1 pavilion with grills; 1 tot lot playground Page G-4
APPENDIX G - Infrastructure AnalysisTable A-3 Current ConditionsLAND CLASSIFICATIONAPPROXIMATE LEVEL OF INTENSITY AND DENSITY1WASTEWATER/ WATER INFRASTRUCTURE (estimated at 200 gallons per day per household)2TRANSPORTATIONSCHOOLS (Using national averages for school age student generation, one can expect .4243 elementary students, .084 middle school students and .1568 high school students per household). It is essential to remember that all of these students will not be entering the school system at one time.RECREATION (using a standard of 15 acres per 1,000 residents)1The creation of this scenario is for an interim analysis only. Conditions may be different pending future development and redevelopment. 2Level of Service (LOS) Data was unaviable for this analysis.JarvisburgPoint HarborDespite its favorable location relative to the Outer Banks, the Jarvisburg area has thus far remained largely rural in character with a development density of 1 unit per acre or less. Signs are emerging, however, that may soon bring considerable change to the area’s heretofore bucolic landscape. Like the Grandy area, the Jarvisburg area is coming under increasing pressure for development. The same land characteristics that traditionally have made this area suitable for farming (cleared, relatively level land with man-made drainage), also make the area quite attractive for development. Currently, land speculation has become more commonplace in the Jarvisburg area, as optioned properties (closing often contingent upon rezoning), offer current owners purchase prices of three or four times their present value. Estimated population ~ 900. Lot coverage 30% and building height limited to 35 ft. Minimum lot size 3 acres. Maximum lot coverage for nonresidential limited to 65% with 35 ft. height limit.Point Harbor has gradually been assuming the characteristics of a full service community with a residential development density of approximately 1 unit per acre with a fair amount of nonresidential development. In addition to a range of housing prices, Point Harbor is today served by a variety of retail and other business establishments. As a result, residents of Point Harbor need not travel great distances to find most of the every day needs. At the same time, with convenience comes the potential for conflicts between land uses; the area must be watchful not to allow poorly planned non-residential uses to adversely impact the character of the area and the peace and quiet traditionally enjoyed by its residents. Estimated population ~ 1225. Minimum lot size 20,000 with 30% lot coverage and maximum 35 ft. building height. Maximum lot coverage for nonresidential limited to 65% with 35 ft. height limit.County water generally available; served by individual on-site septic. County water generally available; served by individual on-site septic. Served by a system of local roads and minor collectors feeding into US 158. Confronted with level of service challenges during the tourist season.Served by a system of local roads and minor collectors feeding into US 158. Confronted with level of service challenges during the tourist season.Sound Park, located in Harbinger Includes: 2 pavilions with grills and restrooms; 2 boat ramps; 1 boardwalk with 2 gazebos; 1 wildlife overlook on the Sound; 2 playgrounds; 1 paved walking trail; 2 baseball/softball fields; 2 volleyball courts; 2 multi-use playing fields Page G-5
APPENDIX G - Infrastructure AnalysisTable A-3 Current ConditionsLAND CLASSIFICATIONAPPROXIMATE LEVEL OF INTENSITY AND DENSITY1WASTEWATER/ WATER INFRASTRUCTURE (estimated at 200 gallons per day per household)2TRANSPORTATIONSCHOOLS (Using national averages for school age student generation, one can expect .4243 elementary students, .084 middle school students and .1568 high school students per household). It is essential to remember that all of these students will not be entering the school system at one time.RECREATION (using a standard of 15 acres per 1,000 residents)1The creation of this scenario is for an interim analysis only. Conditions may be different pending future development and redevelopment. 2Level of Service (LOS) Data was unaviable for this analysis.CorollaCarovaKnotts Island and Gibbs WoodsThe Corolla area is 85 to 90 percent developed at approximately 3 units/acre. The future of this area will be determined less by new development on vacant lots and more by second and third generation redevelopment of lots already built upon. As the value of barrier island property has continued to escalate, the economic incentive for redevelopment of existing properties has heightened dramatically.. This means that older era beach cottages can be torn down and replaced by much larger and more massive residential structures. It also means that, as this phenomenon takes effect, the Corolla area will witness increases in impervious surface areas, greater demand for drinking water and wastewater treatment capacities, the need for more parking, greater traffic generation, and the need for greater fire flows to handle much larger, bulkier structures. Estimated population ~ 400. Minimum lot size 7500 sq. ft. with 30% lot coverage and maximum 35 ft. building height. Maximum lot coverage for nonresidential limited to 65% with 35 ft. height limit. Estimated Seasonal Population ~ 29,000The Carova area is also called the “Off-Road” or “4 Wheel Drive” area of Currituck County. While current regulations require minimum lot sizes of 120,000 square feet (equivalent to about 1 unit per 3 acres), there are many pre-existing vacant lots, platted under the County’s previous land use standards at 15,000 square feet per lot (equivalent to about 3 units per acre). This area has also been designated by the Federal government as a COBRA (Coastal Barriers Resource Act) area, meaning that no structure in this area is eligible for Federal flood insurance and no Federal money may be spent in this area that would stimulate development. Estimated population ~ 100. Lot coverage 30% and building height limited to 35 ft. Minimum lot size 3 acres. No nonresidential uses permitted. Est. Seasonal Population - 9,600Knotts Island and Gibbs Woods have several characteristics in common, and are therefore treated jointly here. First, both areas possess geographic positions and overland transportation linkages that tie them as much to Tidewater Virginia as to Currituck County. Second, they are very much residential in character, with vast areas of open space, influenced in large measure, by extensive wetlands. The existing development density is 1 unit per 3 acres. The two areas have few services, in terms of both business and infrastructure, and the residents have expressed no strong desire to change that. Population as of the 2000 census - 1390. Lot coverage 30% and building height limited to 35 ft. Minimum lot size 3 acres. Maximum lot coverage for nonresidential limited to 65% with 35 ft. height limit.Served by a combination of county and community water and community sewer. SOBWS System connections– 1,100; Ocean Sands Water and Sewer District – 950; Corolla Light and Monteray Shores – 900. Currituck Club 350,000 GPD, Pine Island 250,000 GPD water and waste water.Served by individual on-site water and septic.Served by individual on-site water and septic.Served by a system of local roads and minor collectors feeding into US 158. Confronted with level of service challenges during the tourist season.Served by a system of unpaved roads not within the public domain.Served by a system of local and collector roads with bridge access to Virginia and ferry access to the Currituck mainland.Elementary School Capacity - 219; Remaining Seats - 71Knotts Island Ruritan Park, located on Brumley Road, Knotts IslandIncludes:1 pavilion with grills and restrooms; 1 tot lot playground; Knotts Island Senior Center is located next to the park Page G-6
APPENDIX H - Infrastructure AnalysisTable A-4 Projection for Maximum Density BuildoutLAND CLASSIFICATIONConservationRuralLimited ServiceAPPROXIMATE LEVEL OF INTENSITY AND DENSITYPrimarily land already protected. Development will be primarily residential in nature; single-family detached on large lots of a minimum if 3 acres. Lot coverage limited to 30% and building height limited to 35 ft. Only 2% of the total land area is expected to develop in the planning period. Est. Population - 1,200. Development expected to be primarily residential in nature; single family detached; minimum lot size of 3 acres. Lot coverage 30% and building height limited to 35 ft. Any nonresidential development should be agriculturally based. Of the developed area 97% is expected to be residential with 3% nonresidential. The remaining undeveloped area is expected to remiain in agriculture. Est. Population - 2,000.Despite the overall low density of these areas, efforts should be made to encourage clusters of residential uses to preserve open space and to provide for a sense of a "community". Base development density should be 1 unit per acre but could be increased to 1.5 units per acre through overlay zoning depending upon whether service facilities are in place or planned and the potential impact on the surrounding community. Minimum lot size ~ 20,000 with ~30% lot coverage and maximum 35 ft. building height. In the same instances where slightly higher density is considered appropriate a moderate mix of housing types such as semi-detached would also be considered reasonable. With respect to nonresidential uses, it is essential that the existing community character be preserved. Design criteria should be established to ensure that commercial development protects and preserves the existing community in scale, architectural style, materials, landscaping, and site design. In general, neighborhood commercial uses are more appropriate than large scale commercial complexes. However, business designed to serve the tourist industry such as small gift shops or agri-tourism related uses should not be prohibited provided the character and intensity of the use is in keeping with the character of the surrounding area. Maximum lot coverage for nonresidential limited to 65% with 35 ft. height limit. 65% expected to develop within planning period; 96.5% residential; 3.5% nonresidential. Est. Population - 12,000. Very limited municipal-type services, such as fire protection, emergency services, and community water, may be available, but centralized sewage collection and treatment systems whether public or community are not appropriate for these areas. Est. Seasonal Population - 7,000WASTEWATER/WATER INFRASTRUCTUREWill continue to be served by individual on-site water and wastewater.Will continue to be served by individual on-site water and wastewater.Central water ~1.4 million gpd and individual on-site septic.TRANSPORTATIONGenerally served by rural state maintained and private roads. Traffic generation is anticipated to remain low and therefore a higher level of service maintained.Generally served by rural state maintained and private roads. Traffic generation is anticipated to remain low and therefore a higher level of service should be maintained with the exception of areas along US 158 at defined times during the tourist season.As development comes on-line, level of service is likely to decrease. Emphasis on interconnectivity among local roads. Consider requiring traffic impact studies as part of the development review process to address level of service impacts. Much of the Limited Service Area is located along the US 158 corridor where level of service is already compromised during the summer season. The projected increase in seasonal population coupled with the increae in year round population is likely to decrease level of service along the highway further necessitating improvement to intersections as well as connectivity of secondary roads.SCHOOLS (Using national averages for school age student generation, one can expect .4243 elementary students, .084 middle school students and .1568 high school students per household). It is essential to remember that all of these students will not be entering the school system at one time.197 elementary school students; 39 middle school students; 73 high school students424 elementary school students; 84 middle school students; 156 high school students2,813 elementary school students; 556 middle school students; 1,039 high school studentsRECREATION (using a standard of 15 acres per 1,000 residents)Need for additional 15 acres of park area, likely to be provided by neighborhood recreation areas given the limited population density. Residents will also be served by community and regional parks located in the limited and full service areas.Need for an additional 30 acres of park area, most of which will be served by neighborhood recreation areas given the limited population density. Residents will also be served by community and regional parks located in the limited and full service areas.Need for an additional 400 acres of park area. Likely to be a mix of neighborhood and community parks.Page 1 of 6
APPENDIX H - Infrastructure AnalysisTable A-4 Projection for Maximum Density BuildoutLAND CLASSIFICATIONAPPROXIMATE LEVEL OF INTENSITY AND DENSITYWASTEWATER/WATER INFRASTRUCTURETRANSPORTATIONSCHOOLS (Using national averages for school age student generation, one can expect .4243 elementary students, .084 middle school students and .1568 high school students per household). It is essential to remember that all of these students will not be entering the school system at one time.RECREATION (using a standard of 15 acres per 1,000 residents)Full ServiceMoyock AreaAreas designated as Full Service are those parts of the county where a broad range of infrastructure and service investments have been provided or will be made available by the public and/or private sectors. Infrastructure investments may include, for example, community level or centralized water, parks, schools, fire and rescue facilities. Central wastewater treatment and disposal whether public or community is considered reasonable in the Full Service Areas. With respect to residential development, base development density is contemplated to be 2 units per acre but could be increased to 3-4 units per acre through overlay zoning depending upon services available and the potential impact on the surrounding area. Minimum lot size ~10,000 sq. ft.with ~40% lot coverage and maximum 35 ft. building height. A greater diversity in housing types (i.e. semi-detached, attached, multi-family) would be considered appropriate in the Full Service areas. Residential development densities should be medium to high depending upon available services. In areas where on-site wastewater is proposed and other County services are limited, development density should be limited to 1-2 units per acre. However in areas where central sewer is proposed or existing, additional services are available and the character of the surrounding areas supports it, higher density ranging from 3-4 units per acre could be considered through the use of overlay zones. Clustered housing developments, with open space required by ordinance, will need to be encouraged. If sewage treatment collection systems are built, whether publicly or privately, all such systems should be designed so as to allow them to be tied together into a single system at some point in the future. With respect to nonresidential uses, it is essential that the existing community character be preserved. Maximum lot coverage for nonresidential limited to 65% with 35 ft. height limit. Design criteria should be established to ensure that commercial development protects and preserves the existing community in scale, architectural style, materials, landscaping, and site design. Nonresidential uses may include clusters of businesses serving the immediate area and, where appropriate, a more extensive market territory. Est. Population - 29,500. 80% expected to develop during planning period; 93.2% residential; 6.8% nonresidential. Some of the areas identified for Full Service also include prime farmland. In an effort to protect existing agricultural operations, efforts should be made to buffer them from encroaching development through the use of landscaping and conservation oriented design. Est. Seasonal Population - 7,000. Residential County water ~4.8 million gpd. If sewage treatment collection systems are built, whether publicly or privately, all such systems should be designed so as to allow them to be tied together into a single system at some point in the future. County water in full service and limited service areas. If sewage treatment collection systems are built, whether publicly or privately, all such systems should be designed so as to allow them to be tied together into a single system at some point in the future. As development comes on-line, level of service is likely to decrease. Emphasis on interconnectivity among local roads as well as pedesrian circulation. Consider requiring traffic impact studies as part of the development review process to address level of service impacts. Much of the Full Service Area is located along the US 158 corridor where level of service is already compromised during the summer season. The projected increase in seasonal population coupled with the increae in year round population is likely to decrease level of service along the highway further necessitating improvement to intersections as well as connectivity of secondary roads.The proposed 168 Bypass will be needed to address the increased traffic loads passing into and through this area. Protections should be put in place before the Bypass is built so as to conserve the integrity and traffic moving function of this new roadway. Appropriate land use controls and access management will be critical in protecting the public’s investment in the new roadway. A selected right of way corridor that gives proper consideration to avoiding existing home sites will be important. Traffic management on secondary and local roads will also need to receive attention.10,352 elementary school students; 2,049 middle school students; 3,825 high school studentsNeed for an additional 440 acres of park area. Likely to be a mix of neighborhood, community, and regional services. Page 2 of 6
APPENDIX H - Infrastructure AnalysisTable A-4 Projection for Maximum Density BuildoutLAND CLASSIFICATIONAPPROXIMATE LEVEL OF INTENSITY AND DENSITYWASTEWATER/WATER INFRASTRUCTURETRANSPORTATIONSCHOOLS (Using national averages for school age student generation, one can expect .4243 elementary students, .084 middle school students and .1568 high school students per household). It is essential to remember that all of these students will not be entering the school system at one time.RECREATION (using a standard of 15 acres per 1,000 residents)Shawboro/CrawfordCourthouse AreaBarco/Coinjock/Airport AreaResidential development, when approved, should bear some direct relationship to agricultural activity so as to minimize land use conflicts between farm operations and nearby residents. When residential development does occur, it should be strategically located to minimize conflicts. Common sense examples include placing residential development: (1) upwind of prevailing winds and open fields (2) behind or in and among wooded areas (3) clustered near existing non-farm uses such as a church, general store or other residences. “Leapfrog” residential subdivisions, unrelated to farm activities, and that would interrupt a large expanse of agriculture and open space, should be strongly discouraged.The policy emphasis of this plan is for the Courthouse area to continue to grow as a small community center therefore much of the area is considered Full Service and Limited Service. Given the existing cluster of services and local government functions here, and the sizable area of developable land adjoining the sound, it is likely that the Courthouse area will continue to see limited growth over the next decade. This growth is not apt to be as significant as in the Moyock area, where substantial numbers of workers will work in Tidewater Virginia but choose to live in Currituck County. Similarly, the completion of the proposed Mid-County Bridge will likely spawn the construction of some residences for workers commuting to jobs on the Outer Banks, but not to the same degree as in the Barco/Coinjock area. Even so, as Currituck County continues to grow, new residences will move into the Courthouse area, and a commensurate number of new businesses will likely follow. Residential development densities should be medium to high depending upon available services. The policy emphasis of this plan is for the Barco/Coinjock/Airport area to emerge as the principal community center serving the central area of the mainland and is therefore included as a Full Service Area. Further, as the area comes into its own as a distinct community center, the reciprocal needs of homes and businesses will feed off each other, adding even more growth to the area. As is the case with the Courthouse area, care should be taken to encourage quality development and the preservation of open space in conjunction with development approvals. Small businesses serving the needs of a rural area (general store, farm supply, hardware, etc.) should be encouraged to locate at road intersections. Residential development density equal to or less than one unit per three acres is to be encouraged in the Shawboro/Crawford area and it has therefore been identified as a mix Conservation and Rural Areas on the Future Land Use Map. Private access subdivisions, which allow up to five one-acre lots to occur anywhere without review or input from the Planning Board or Farmland Preservation Board, are to be especially discouraged here. In areas where on-site wastewater is proposed and other County services are limited, development density should be limited to 1-2 units per acre. However in areas where central sewer is proposed or existing, additional services are available and the character of the surrounding areas supports it, higher density ranging from 3-4 units per acre could be considered through the use of overlay zones. Regardless of the level of growth, care should be taken to encourage quality development and the preservation of open space in conjunction with development approvals. Residential development densities should be medium to high depending upon available services. In areas where on-site wastewater is proposed and other County services are limited, development density should be limited to 1-2 units per acre. However in areas where central sewer is proposed or existing, additional services are available and the character of the surrounding areas supports it, higher density ranging from 3-4 units per acre could be considered through the use of overlay zones. Will continue to be served by individual on-site water and wastewater.County water in full service and limited service areas. If sewage treatment collection systems are built, whether publicly or privately, all such systems should be designed so as to allow them to be tied together into a single system at some point in the future. County water in full service and limited service areas. If sewage treatment collection systems are built, whether publicly or privately, all such systems should be designed so as to allow them to be tied together into a single system at some point in the future. The policy emphasis of this plan is to encourage the preservation of agriculture and open space in the Shawboro/Crawford area whenever possible. While this area will be impacted by the proposed NC 168 Bypass, the overarching development policies of the area should hold. The purpose of the proposed bypass is to move traffic through the County rather than create an additional development center and therefore access should be limited. The County should study the area more closely as it proceeds with an update to the Thoroughfare Plan. As development comes on-line, level of service is likely to decrease. Emphasis on interconnectivity among local roads as well as pedesrian circulation. Consider requiring traffic impact studies as part of the development review process to address level of service impacts.Once the proposed Mid-County Bridge is completed, it is quite likely that this area will become a major new mainland service area for the Corolla and Carova areas of Currituck County. This means that the area is apt to see a large number of residences built for workers commuting to construction and service jobs on the Outer Banks. Page 3 of 6
APPENDIX H - Infrastructure AnalysisTable A-4 Projection for Maximum Density BuildoutLAND CLASSIFICATIONAPPROXIMATE LEVEL OF INTENSITY AND DENSITYWASTEWATER/WATER INFRASTRUCTURETRANSPORTATIONSCHOOLS (Using national averages for school age student generation, one can expect .4243 elementary students, .084 middle school students and .1568 high school students per household). It is essential to remember that all of these students will not be entering the school system at one time.RECREATION (using a standard of 15 acres per 1,000 residents)Intersection of Proposed Mid-County Bridge and US Highway 158Aydlett and Waterlily/Churches IslandGrandyIt is expected that wetlands will block commercial development from occurring at locations removed from the US 158 corridor. For these reasons the area is identified on the Future Land Use Map as Limited Service. At the same time, care should be taken to adequately control the location and design of commercial development so as not to compromise the traffic moving function of the new bridge and roads leading to it. Community aesthetics and image associated with new development along this major travel corridor should also receive strong consideration is setting standards for development approval here. While currently limited to 1 housing unit per acre, residential development densities in this area could be increased to 1.5 units per acre upon completion of the proposed Mid-County Bridge and availability of services.The policy emphasis of this plan is for developable areas of Aydlett, Waterlily and Churches Island to remain as low-density residential areas at 1 unit per acre. The area is a mix of Limited Service and Rural classifications on the Future Land Use Map. Generally, no centralized sewer services should be provided to these areas that would induce more intensive development; residences will continue to rely upon individual septic systems. While services that satisfy direct public health, safety and general welfare needs, such as fire protection, law enforcement, and emergency medical services are to be welcomed, no commercial development should be permitted in these areas. Finally, as noted in the preceding discussion of the Mid-County Bridge, there is to be no access from the bridge road into communities near the landfall for the bridge.The policy emphasis of this plan is to allow Grandy to further evolve as a community center in its own right and it is identified as a Full Service area on the Future Land Use Plan. Residential development densities should be medium to high depending upon available services. In areas where on-site wastewater is proposed and other County services are limited, development density should be limited to 1-2 units per acre. However in areas where central sewer is proposed or existing, additional services are available and the character of the surrounding areas supports it, higher density ranging from 3-4 units per acre could be considered through the use of overlay zones. Clustered housing developments, with open space required by ordinance, is encouraged. Given the existing development pattern and availability of services, much of the Grandy area is planned as Full Service. However, it should be noted that three (3) of the land use classifications are included in Grandy and the surrounding area.There are existing environmentally sensitive areas that cannot support higher density development and are therefore classified as Conservation Areas. In addition, it is not the County’s intention to develop all of Grandy intensely but rather create specific service centers and to provide a buffer of Limited Service Areas at lower density development between Full Service Areas and those within the Conservation classification.County water in full service and limited service areas. If sewage treatment collection systems are built, whether publicly or privately, all such systems should be designed so as to allow them to be tied together into a single system at some point in the future. Generally, no centralized sewer services should be provided to these areas that would induce more intensive development; residences will continue to rely upon individual septic systems.If sewage treatment collection systems are built, whether publicly or privately, all such systems should be designed so as to allow them to be tied together into a single system at some point in the future. The policy emphasis of this plan is for there to be no access from the bridge road into the Aydlett community, thereby protecting the community from unwanted commercial development. Rather, commercial development spawned by the bridge should be clustered just off US 158 north and south of the new intersection with the bridge road. As development comes on-line, level of service is likely to decrease. Emphasis on interconnectivity among local roads as well as pedesrian circulation. Consider requiring traffic impact studies as part of the development review process to address level of service impacts. Aydeltt Road likely to emerge as a major collector.As development comes on-line, level of service is likely to decrease. Emphasis on interconnectivity among local roads as well as pedesrian circulation. Consider requiring traffic impact studies as part of the development review process to address level of service impacts.Page 4 of 6
APPENDIX H - Infrastructure AnalysisTable A-4 Projection for Maximum Density BuildoutLAND CLASSIFICATIONAPPROXIMATE LEVEL OF INTENSITY AND DENSITYWASTEWATER/WATER INFRASTRUCTURETRANSPORTATIONSCHOOLS (Using national averages for school age student generation, one can expect .4243 elementary students, .084 middle school students and .1568 high school students per household). It is essential to remember that all of these students will not be entering the school system at one time.RECREATION (using a standard of 15 acres per 1,000 residents)JarvisburgPoint HarborCorollaCarovaThe policy emphasis of this plan is to allow the Jarvisburg area to accommodate quality residential development at low densities while preserving the rural landscape between such developments. Similar to the Grandy area, but at a lower overall density, new residential development should be encouraged to locate in compact, village like clusters, preferably near existing, non-agricultural activities and services. An example might be a new compact, walkable neighborhood of homes built near an existing or proposed church, school or compatibly designed general store. Residential development density can be higher than the truly expansive Shawboro/Crawford rural area, but still much less that the densities to be found in Grandy to the north or Point Harbor to the south. The area is encompassed both the Conservation and Limited Service classifications and an average density of 1 unit per acre is contemplated.The policy emphasis of this plan is to allow the Point Harbor area to continue to evolve as a full service community, but with better attention to the planning needed to protect residential areas and the natural features that make the area so attractive. Policies and actions contained in the land use plan should work to: (1) preserve and enhance the roadside appearance of land uses along US 158, (2) place stricter controls over mining to assure that such operations do not adversely impact nearby areas, (3) cluster retail and other service businesses in carefully planned clusters, rather than encourage ordinary strip centers along the highway, (4) Require vegetated buffers around non-residential uses to protect existing and planned neighborhoods (5) Require vegetated buffers along shorelines to preserve public access and open space at the waters edge and to protect water quality in the sound (6) and coordinate with NCDOT for the strategic placement of traffic signals along US 158 in the Southern portion of the Mainland. The policy emphasis of this plan is to allow for predominantly medium density residential development (2 to 3 units per acre) with minimal commercial development arranged in clusters. An overall density of no more than 3 units per acre should also apply to PUDs, the prevailing development form in the Corolla area. PUDs should also have a mandated 30% permanent open space requirement. Strip commercial development is to be avoided for both aesthetic as well as traffic moving considerations. Development and redevelopment should be capable of being supported by the area’s infrastructure and services—particularly drinking water, sewage treatment, road capacity, parking areas, and required fire suppression capabilities. Development standards should recognize that massive residential structures, whether built as a “single family” structure or partitioned into multi-family condominiums, can be equally intense in terms of the number of occupants, number of cars, water consumed, traffic generated, etc. The policy emphasis of this plan is to allow for very low to medium density (1unit per 3 acres) residential development without infrastructure or service investments that could stimulate growth and development. In terms of infrastructure, this means that no centralized water and sewer services, public or private, will be approved and no hard surface roads will be allowed. Further, only services that protect the health, safety, and welfare (i.e. law enforcement, fire and rescue.) will be authorized. Commercial and other convenience services shall not be allowed. Est. Seasonal Population - 40,000 Housing in the Point Harbor area should continue to reflect a range of housing types and prices with emphasis on single-family site-built homes. The majority of the area is included in the Limited Service and Conservation classifications which support densities ranging from 1 unit per 3 acres to 1 unit per acre. However, portions of the area currently evolving as full service community centers have been identified for Full Service contemplating development densities ranging from 1-1.5 units per acre where on-site wastewater is proposed and other County services are limited. Where central sewer is proposed or existing, additional services are available and the character of the surrounding areas supports it, density may be increased to 3-4 units per acre through the use of overlay zones. As with the Moyock and Grandy areas the Limited Service Area will act as a transition or buffer between the Conservation and Full Service Areas. Reasonable development/redevelopment limits should be set which balance the property rights of the individual against legitimate concerns about public health and safety. Est. Seasonal Population - 50,000Will continue to be served by individual on-site water and wastewater.County water in full service and limited service areas. If sewage treatment collection systems are built, whether publicly or privately, all such systems should be designed so as to allow them to be tied together into a single system at some point in the future. Will continue to be served by a combination of community and County water as well as community wastewater systems. The existing water plant can produce 2 mgd but is capable of being expanded for future growth. As development in Corolla continues such expansion will likely be warranted. Will continue to be served by individual on-site water and wastewater.As development comes on-line, level of service is likely to decrease. Emphasis on interconnectivity among local roads. Consider requiring traffic impact studies as part of the development review process to address level of service impacts.As development comes on-line, level of service is likely to decrease. Emphasis on interconnectivity among local roads as well as pedesrian circulation. Consider requiring traffic impact studies as part of the development review process to address level of service impacts.Level of service will continue to be a concern. Improvements to Route 12 in Dare and Currituck Counties will be imperative. The Mid-County Bridge will also be a priority. Continued emphasis on pedestrian circulation.Will continue to be served by a system of unpaved roads. Maintenance of the roads will continue to be a concern as they are not within the public domain. Page 5 of 6
APPENDIX H - Infrastructure AnalysisTable A-4 Projection for Maximum Density BuildoutLAND CLASSIFICATIONAPPROXIMATE LEVEL OF INTENSITY AND DENSITYWASTEWATER/WATER INFRASTRUCTURETRANSPORTATIONSCHOOLS (Using national averages for school age student generation, one can expect .4243 elementary students, .084 middle school students and .1568 high school students per household). It is essential to remember that all of these students will not be entering the school system at one time.RECREATION (using a standard of 15 acres per 1,000 residents)Knotts Island and Gibbs WoodsThe policy emphasis of this plan is for developable areas of Knotts Island and Gibbs Woods to remain as low to very low density residential areas. This means predominantly 1 unit per 3 acres. In keeping with the wishes of the majority of residents in these two areas, no services or infrastructure should be provided that would serve as an inducement to more intensive development. Services that satisfy direct public health, safety and general welfare needs, such as fire protection, law enforcement, and emergency medical services should, however, be periodically evaluated and improved as necessary. Estimated Seasonal Population - 8,000Continue use of individual on-site well and septic.Will continue to be served by a system of secondary roads with access to Virginia. Emphasis on continued maintenance on the road system. Continued ferry service to the Currituck Mainland. Page 6 of 6
Appendices
A-31

Appendix I. MAPS

Map 1.1: General Reference Map of Currituck County

Map 3.1: Map of Areas of Environmental Concern

Map 3.2: Soil Suitability for Septic Tanks Map

Map 3.3: Water Quality Classes and Sub-Basins Map

Map 3.4: Flood Hazard Areas Map

Map 3.5: Fragile Areas Map

Map 3.6: Environmental Composite Map

Maps 3.7-3.10: Erosion Rate Maps

Map 4.1: Existing Land Use Map

Map 5.1: Water and Sewer Systems Map

Map 5.2: Transportation Map

Map 6.1: Land Suitability Analysis Map

Map 11.1: Future Land Use Map (Land Use Classification Map)

Spot
Mamie
Barco
Maple
Sligo
Bertha
Grandy
Moyock
Gregory
Corolla
Aydlett
Snowden
Coinjock
Shawboro
Harbinger
Waterlily
Currituck
Jarvisburg
Gibbs Woods
Point Harbor
Knotts Island
Powells Point
Poplar Branch
0 5 102.5 Miles
Moyock Township FruitvilleTownship
CrawfordTownship
Poplar BranchTownship
A l b e m a r l e S o u n d Cur
r
i
t
uck SoundAtlantic OceanNo
r
t
h
Ri
v
e
r
V I R G I N I AVIRGINIA
C
a
m
d
e
n
C
o
u
nty
C
a
m
d
e
n
C
o
u
nty
P
a
s
q
u
ota
n
k
C
o
u
nty
P
a
s
q
u
ota
n
k
C
o
u
nty
Map 1.1Overview Map of Currituck CountyCAMA Land Use Plan Update
The preparation of this map was financedin part through a grant provided by the NorthCarolina Coastal Management Program,through the funds provided by the NorthCarolina Coastal Management Act of 1972,as amended, which is administered by theOffice of Ocean and Coastal ResourceManagement, National Oceanic andAtmospheric Administration.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!4
0 5 102.5
Miles
A l b e m a r l e S o u n d Cur
r
i
t
uck SoundAtlantic OceanNo
r
t
h
Ri
v
e
r
V I R G I N I AVIRGINIA
C
a
md
e
n

C
o
u
n
t
y
C
a
md
e
n

C
o
u
n
t
y
P
a
s
q
u
o
t
a
n
k

C
o
u
n
t
y
P
a
s
q
u
o
t
a
n
k

C
o
u
n
t
y
Map 3.1Areas of Environmental Concern (AEC)CAMA Land Use Plan Update
The preparation of this map was financed
in part through a grant provided by the North
Carolina Coastal Management Program,
through the funds provided by the North
Carolina Coastal Management Act of 1972,
as amended, which is administered by the
Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource
Management, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.
`WV"D&U1`3EM3d]-4M%D-$#b@Fe0!`/05Q>*YT
4
0 5 102.5
Miles
A l b e m a r l e S o u n d Cur
r
i
t
uck SoundAtlantic OceanNo
r
t
h
Ri
v
e
r
V I R G I N I AVIRGINIA
C
a
md
e
n

C
o
u
n
t
y
C
a
md
e
n

C
o
u
n
t
y
P
a
s
q
u
o
t
a
n
k

C
o
u
n
t
y
P
a
s
q
u
o
t
a
n
k

C
o
u
n
t
y
Map 3.2Soil Suitability for Septic SystemsCAMA Land Use Plan Update
The preparation of this map was financed
in part through a grant provided by the North
Carolina Coastal Management Program,
through the funds provided by the North
Carolina Coastal Management Act of 1972,
as amended, which is administered by the
Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource
Management, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.
`WV"D&U1`3EM3d]-4M%D-$#b@Fe0!`/05Q>*YT
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!
!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
PAS54
PAS50
PAS51
PAS56
4
0 5 102.5
Miles
A l b e m a r l e S o u n d Cur
r
i
t
uck SoundAtlantic OceanNo
r
t
h
Ri
v
e
r
V I R G I N I AVIRGINIA
C
a
md
e
n

C
o
u
n
t
y
C
a
md
e
n

C
o
u
n
t
y
P
a
s
q
u
o
t
a
n
k

C
o
u
n
t
y
P
a
s
q
u
o
t
a
n
k

C
o
u
n
t
y
Map 3.3Water Quality Classes and SubbasinsCAMA Land Use Plan Update
The preparation of this map was financed
in part through a grant provided by the North
Carolina Coastal Management Program,
through the funds provided by the North
Carolina Coastal Management Act of 1972,
as amended, which is administered by the
Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource
Management, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.
`WV"D&U1`3EM3d]-4M%D-$#b@Fe0!`/05Q>*YT
4
0 5 102.5
Miles
A l b e m a r l e S o u n d Cur
r
i
t
uck SoundAtlantic OceanNo
r
t
h
Ri
v
e
r
V I R G I N I AVIRGINIA
C
a
md
e
n

C
o
u
n
t
y
C
a
md
e
n

C
o
u
n
t
y
P
a
s
q
u
o
t
a
n
k

C
o
u
n
t
y
P
a
s
q
u
o
t
a
n
k

C
o
u
n
t
y
Map 3.4Flood Hazard Areas (100 Year Only)CAMA Land Use Plan Update
The preparation of this map was financed
in part through a grant provided by the North
Carolina Coastal Management Program,
through the funds provided by the North
Carolina Coastal Management Act of 1972,
as amended, which is administered by the
Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource
Management, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.
`WV"D&U1`3EM3d]-4M%D-$#b@Fe0!`/05Q>*YT
4
0 5 102.5
Miles
A l b e m a r l e S o u n d Cur
r
i
t
uck SoundAtlantic OceanNo
r
t
h
Ri
v
e
r
V I R G I N I AVIRGINIA
C
a
md
e
n

C
o
u
n
t
y
C
a
md
e
n

C
o
u
n
t
y
P
a
s
q
u
o
t
a
n
k

C
o
u
n
t
y
P
a
s
q
u
o
t
a
n
k

C
o
u
n
t
y
Map 3.5Fragile AreasCAMA Land Use Plan Update
The preparation of this map was financed
in part through a grant provided by the North
Carolina Coastal Management Program,
through the funds provided by the North
Carolina Coastal Management Act of 1972,
as amended, which is administered by the
Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource
Management, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.
`WV"D&U1`3EM3d]-4M%D-$#b@Fe0!`/05Q>*YT
4
0 3 61.5
Miles
A l b e m a r l e S o u n d Cur
r
i
t
uck SoundAtlantic OceanNo
r
t
h
Ri
v
e
r
V I R G I N I AVIRGINIA
C
a
md
e
n

C
o
u
n
t
y
C
a
md
e
n

C
o
u
n
t
y
P
a
s
q
u
o
t
a
n
k

C
o
u
n
t
y
P
a
s
q
u
o
t
a
n
k

C
o
u
n
t
y
Map 3.6Environmental CompositeCAMA Land Use Plan Update
The preparation of this map was financed
in part through a grant provided by the North
Carolina Coastal Management Program,
through the funds provided by the North
Carolina Coastal Management Act of 1972,
as amended, which is administered by the
Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource
Management, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.
`WV"D&U1`3EM3d]-4M%D-$#b@Fe0!`/05Q>*YT
4
0 5 102.5
Miles
A l b e m a r l e S o u n d Cur
r
i
t
uck SoundAtlantic OceanNo
r
t
h
Ri
v
e
r
V I R G I N I AVIRGINIA
C
a
md
e
n

C
o
u
n
t
y
C
a
md
e
n

C
o
u
n
t
y
P
a
s
q
u
o
t
a
n
k

C
o
u
n
t
y
P
a
s
q
u
o
t
a
n
k

C
o
u
n
t
y
Map 4.1Existing Land UseCAMA Land Use Plan Update
The preparation of this map was financed
in part through a grant provided by the North
Carolina Coastal Management Program,
through the funds provided by the North
Carolina Coastal Management Act of 1972,
as amended, which is administered by the
Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource
Management, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.
`WV"D&U1`3EM3d]-4M%D-$#b@Fe0!`/05Q>*YT
%2")
!.
")
")
!.
%2
&3")
%2 %2
!.
%2
")
")
!.
")
")&3
!.
")!.
"/"/
4
0 5 102.5
Miles
A l b e m a r l e S o u n d Atlantic OceanNo
r
t
h
Ri
v
e
r
V I R G I N I AVIRGINIA
C
a
md
e
n

C
o
u
n
t
y
C
a
md
e
n

C
o
u
n
t
y
P
a
s
q
u
o
t
a
n
k

C
o
u
n
t
y
P
a
s
q
u
o
t
a
n
k

C
o
u
n
t
y
Map 5.1Water and Sewer SystemsCAMA Land Use Plan Update
The preparation of this map was financed
in part through a grant provided by the North
Carolina Coastal Management Program,
through the funds provided by the North
Carolina Coastal Management Act of 1972,
as amended, which is administered by the
Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource
Management, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.
`WV"D&U1`3EM3d]-4M%D-$#b@Fe0!`/05Q>*YT
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!.
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
Spot
Mamie
Barco
Maple
Sligo
Bertha
Grandy
Moyock
Gregory
Corolla
Aydlett
Snowden
Coinjock
Shawboro
Harbinger
Waterlily
Currituck
Jarvisburg
Gibbs Woods
Point Harbor
Knotts Island
Powells Point
Poplar Branch
B-3445
B-4094
B-2950
B-4494
4
0 5 102.5
Miles
A l b e m a r l e S o u n d Cur
r
i
t
uck SoundAtlantic OceanNo
r
t
h
Ri
v
e
r
V I R G I N I AVIRGINIA
C
a
md
e
n

C
o
u
n
t
y
C
a
md
e
n

C
o
u
n
t
y
P
a
s
q
u
o
t
a
n
k

C
o
u
n
t
y
P
a
s
q
u
o
t
a
n
k

C
o
u
n
t
y
Map 5.2TransportationCAMA Land Use Plan Update
The preparation of this map was financed
in part through a grant provided by the North
Carolina Coastal Management Program,
through the funds provided by the North
Carolina Coastal Management Act of 1972,
as amended, which is administered by the
Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource
Management, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.
`WV"D&U1`3EM3d]-4M%D-$#b@Fe0!`/05Q>*YT
4
0 3 61.5
Miles
A l b e m a r l e S o u n d Cur
r
i
t
uck SoundAtlantic OceanNo
r
t
h
Ri
v
e
r
V I R G I N I AVIRGINIA
C
a
md
e
n

C
o
u
n
t
y
C
a
md
e
n

C
o
u
n
t
y
P
a
s
q
u
o
t
a
n
k

C
o
u
n
t
y
P
a
s
q
u
o
t
a
n
k

C
o
u
n
t
y
Map 6.1Land Suitability AnalysisCAMA Land Use Plan Update
The preparation of this map was financed
in part through a grant provided by the North
Carolina Coastal Management Program,
through the funds provided by the North
Carolina Coastal Management Act of 1972,
as amended, which is administered by the
Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource
Management, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.
`WV"D&U1`3EM3d]-4M%D-$#b@Fe0!`/05Q>*YT
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
n
nn
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
1
6
8
B
y
p
a
s
s
P r o p o s e d M i d -C o u n t y B r i d g e
Map 11.1Future Land Use Plan Map
Curri tuck County, North Carolina
The preparation of this map was financed in part through a grant provided by the North Carolina Coastal Management Program, through the funds provided by the North Carolina Coastal Management Act of 1972, as amended, which is administered by the Office of Ocean and CoastalResource Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.!Moyock Sub-Area p. 11-4
!
Shawboro/Crawford Sub-Area p. 11-5 !Courthouse Sub-Area p. 11-6
!
Barco/C oinjock/A irport Sub-Area p. 11-6 !Knotts Island/Gibbs Woods Sub-Area p. 11-11
!Carova Sub-Area p. 11-11!Corolla Sub-Area p. 11-10!Aydlett/Waterlilyand Churches IslandSub-Area p. 11-7
!
Intersection of Proposed Mid-CountyBridge and US H ighway 158Sub-A rea p. 11-7
!Grandy Sub-Area p. 11-8
!Jarvisburg Sub-Area p. 11-9
!Point Harbor Sub-Area p. 11-9!!![
0 1 2 3 40.5 Miles
Adopted by the Board of Commissioners November 20, 2006: Amended August 2008, August 2009, March 2019, October 2021 and November 2021.
Description of Land Classifications
Conservation Areas
Rural Area s (Areas Preferred for Open Sp ace and Agricultural Preservation
Lim ited Servic e Areas (Areas Preferred for Low D ensity Development)
Full Service Areas (Areas Preferred for Com m unity Centers)
The purpose of the Conservation class is to provide for the long-term management and protection of significant, limited, or irreplaceable areas. Proper management is needed to conserve the natural, cultural, recreational, scenic or biologically productive values of these areas. Infrastructure and services, public or private, should not be provided in these areas as a catalyst that could stimulate development. Much of the land included in the Conservation classification is environmentally sensitive and therefore already protected through existing, federal, state, and local regulations. However, for areas within the classification that would be considered developable, uses such as agriculture, agriculture related services, and extremely low density residential development (1 unit per 3 acres or less) would be permitted. W ith the exception of agricultural related uses, nonresidential uses should not be encouraged. It is anticipated that any uses within the Conservation area would be served by individual on-site water and wastewater.
The Rural class is intended to provide for agriculture, forestry, and other allied uses traditionally associated with a rural area. Interior land areas including a significant amount of prime farmland, away from the ocean and sound, and not assigned to the Conservation Class, have been designated Rural. Preferred uses include very low-density dispersed development associated directly with farm uses. Residential dwellings associated with farm activity typically employ on-site water supply (e.g. individual wells) and waste disposal (i.e. septic systems). Areas meeting the intent of this classification are appropriate for or presently used for agriculture, forestry, and other similar uses. Agri-tourism related uses should also be considered appropriate. Population densities are generally very low and development density is anticipated at no more than 1 unit per 3 acres. In addition, any development in the Rural Areas would be served by individual on-site water and septic.
The purpose of the Limited Services Area class is to provide for primarily residential development at low densities. Despite the overall low density of these areas, efforts should be made to encourage clusters of residential uses to preserve open space and to provide for a sense of a "community". Base development density should be 1 unit per acre but could be increased to 1.5 units per acre through overlay zoning depending upon whether service facilities are in place or planned and the potential impact on the surrounding community. In the same instances where slightly higher density is considered appropriate a moderate mix of housing types such as semi-detached would also be considered reasonable. With respect to nonresidential uses, it is essential that the existing community character be preserved. In general, neighborhood commercial uses are more appropriate than large scale commercial complexes. However, business designed to serve the tourist industry such as small gift shops or agri-tourism related uses should not be prohibited provided the character and intensity of the use is in keeping with the character of the surrounding area. Very limited municipal-type services, such as fire protection, emergency services, and community water, may be available. Centralized sewage collection and treatment systems whether public or community may be appropriate for these areas.
Areas designated as Full Service are those parts of the county where a broad range of infrastructure and service investments have been provided or will be made available by the public and/or private sectors. Infrastructure investments may include, for example, community level or centralized water, parks, schools, fire and rescue facilities. Central wastewater treatment and disposal whether public or community is considered reasonable in the Full Service Areas. With respect to residential development, base development density is contemplated to be 2 units per acre but could be increased to 3-4 units per acre through overlay zoning depending upon services available and the potential impact on the surrounding area. A greater diversity in housing types (i.e. semi-detached, attached, multi-family) would be considered appropriate in the Full Service areas. W ith respect to nonresidential uses, it is essential that the existing community character be preserved. Nonresidential uses may include clusters of businesses serving the immediate area and, where appropriate, a more extensive market territory.
Waterline(Incomplete Data)
Major Street
GF Fire/EMS Station
n School
Area Served byOcean Sands W aterand Sewer District
ProposedTransportationFeature
\\
\\Ferry Route 14 Digit Hydrologic Units(Watersheds)
Subarea Boundary