86-19 Richter, Michael

Perm; Class
NEW
Permit Number
86-19
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Quality
and Q
Coastal Resources Commission C+�
ermit
for
Major Development in an Area of Environmental Concern
pursuant to NCGS 113A-118
X Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229
Issued to Michael P. Richter, 211 Stratford Rd., Goldsboro, NC 27534
Authorizing development in Carteret County at adi. to Back Sound, at 126 South Ferry
Dock Rd., in Harkers Island as requested in the permittee's application dated 5/10/19 (MP-
1) and 6/12/19 (MP-2, MP-5), including attached workplan drawing (1), dated 10/4/19.
This permit, issued on October 30, 2019 , is subject to compliance with the application (where
consistent with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation
of these terms may be subject to fines, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and void.
Wetland Fill and Culvert
1) Unless specifically altered herein, this permit authorizes the grading and other land disturbing
activities associated with the development of the above referenced property, including the culvert and
approximately 423 ft of section 404 wetland fill, all as expressly and specifically set forth in the
attached permit application and workplan drawings.
2) No vegetated wetlands shall be excavated or filled, even temporarily, outside of the approved culvert
and fill alignment.
3) The alignment of the authorized fill shall be staked by the permittee and verified by a representative
of the Division of Coastal Management within a maximum of 30 days prior to the start of
construction.
(See attached sheets for Additional Conditions)
This permit action may be appealed by the permittee or other Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DEQ and the Chair
qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the issuing date. of the Coastal Resources Commission.
This permit must be accessible on -site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification not covered
hereunder requires further Division approval.
All work must cease when the permit expires on
December 31, 2022
In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees that
your project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal
Management Program.
Braxton C. Davis, Director
Division of Coastal Management
This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted.
Signature of Permittee

UCIT' el P. Richter
Permit No. 86-19
Page 2 of 3
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
4) The fill material shall be clean and free of any pollutants except in trace quantities.
5) All backfill material shall be obtained from a high ground source.
6) No additional fill, materials or debris shall be stored, even temporarily, within wetlands or within 30 feet
of the normal high water line.
7) If the crossing of wetlands with mechanized construction equipment is necessary, temporary
construction mats shall be utilized for the areas to be crossed. The temporary mats shall be removed
immediately upon completion of construction.
Shoreline Stabilization - Bulkhead
8) The bulkhead shall be constructed in accordance with the alignment depicted on the attached workplan
drawings.
9) No vegetated wetlands shall be excavated or filled, even temporarily, outside of the approved bulkhead
alignment.
10) The alignment of the authorized bulkhead shall be staked by the permittee and verified by a
representative of the Division of Coastal Management within a maximum of 30 days prior to the start of
construction.
11.) The bulkhead shall be solid and constructed of treated wood, concrete slabs, metal or vinyl sheet piles,
or other suitable materials approved by Division personnel.
12) No backfill material is to be placed within 30 feet of the normal high water line.
Sedimentation and Erosion Control
13) Appropriate sedimentation and erosion control devices, measures or structures shall be implemented to
ensure that eroded materials do not enter adjacent wetlands, watercourses or properties.
14) A ground cover sufficient to restrain erosion shall be provided within 30 calendar days of completion of
any phase, of grading on cut or filled slopes. For the bulkhead, at minimum, a silt fence shall be properly
installed immediately landward of the bulkhead cap immediately following completion of backfilling
activities
General
15) This permit shall not be assigned, transferred, sold, or otherwise disposed of to a third party without the
written approval of the Division of Coastal Management.
16) The permittee and/or his or her contractor shall meet with a representative of the Division prior to
project initiation.

1VIicGa'el P. Richter
Permit No. 86-19
Page 3 of 3
a l l 1]t;" 1 ►I I_ l CIJ►E.y
NOTE: This permit does not eliminate the need to obtain any additional state, federal or local permits,
approvals or authorizations that may be required.
NOTE: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers authorized the project by way of Programmatic General
Permit 198000291 (Action ID SAW-2013-00757).
NOTE: The N.C. Division of Water Resources authorized the project by way of General Water Quality
Certification 4175 and assigned the project D WR Project No. 2019-1073.
NOTE: Future development of the permittee's property may require a modification of this permit.
Contact a representative of the Division at [phone] prior to the commencement of any
such activity for this determination. The permittee is further advised that many non -water
dependent activities are not authorized within 30 feet of the normal high water level.
NOTE: An application processing fee of $400 was received by DCM for this project. This fee also
satisfied the Section 401 application processing fee requirements of the Division of Water
Resources.

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
Application Processing Notes
Applicant: _Y liGAN( Plot rr./
Type: (Check all that apply)
New . L` _ - Major Mod _ _ Permit# _ _ Minor Mod Renewal _ _ _ Transfer
Permit Coordinator:
Field Representative: _ __-
Date Time Message
bolo uWF I've, 4p, t s o� v M , # ?kTosa A A(de-.4.
J�C r,.uK''.11�brr`G'l+c j ,MO
" " Novi 1e R0< c>%A
Ar�g fa wort(
tom.
67ma ec( c 1e rz..t5- 0_0 % r�° on pkTas2 it aeA4 o�- amef5 �y wa {
i'o S1k�G�.
9Wi41 YAfL t1 p(gAs 4 iu5�dl'cti��n.
q(o(o 6cut to �M4�� wRCI �1a0. r~SAZC
I4(loll9
Pe�t,4
Co4w*-kT
bw.P 11u5r4�-r
E��-1n a$
4(y5I(9
Q Wy
,'% " (OV40
b%,kF W t
f—i-
n'dra ( G.w �WM" U54TC, �V
0�-k .

Cal( �, r(r: (d:sewwd
1 ejr-h, uStv-C
io�3�14' �u1vt� uPda� ! 0� %rows WiA2Ci, aka Dr1F� wQC f DNQ -b tLf
1o�L2�le ���� fGViGw �' ?T5
6y4y+t jY+47
�Y G -'(lPj'g3 °I«
L(,w Ilv1¢ 41(o13,'°(y
4L) ( 7(;oItsI (°l-�,'°l(V
K L .

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
APPLICATION TRANSMITTAL AND PROCESSING RECORD
1) APPLICANT: Michael Richter
PROJECT NAME: Michael Richter
COUNTY: Carteret
LOCATION OF PROJECT: 126 S. Ferry Dock Rd, Harkers Island
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED COMPLETE BY FIELD: 6/20119
FIELD RECOMMENDATION: Attached: No To Be Forwarded: Yes
CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION: Attached: No To Be Forwarded: n/a
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE: Ryan Davenport DISTRICT OFFICE: MHC
DISTRICT MANAGER REVIEW: Roy Brownlow
B) DATE RECEIVED BY MAJOR PERMITS UNIT: _7/23/19 FEE REC'D: S400 (60140)
PUBLIC NOTICE REC'D: Yes
ADJ. RIP. PROP NOTICES REC D: Yes
APPLICATION ASSIGNED TO: G Bodnar
END OF NOTICE DATE: 8/17/19
DEED REC'D: Yes
ON: 7/23/19
C) 75 DAY DEADLINE:-91449 "WO 150 DAY DEADLINE:
MAIL OUT DATE: 7/23/19
STATE DUE DATE: 8/13/19
DATE
AGENCY
COMMENTS
OBJECTIONS:
NOTES
RETURNED
YES NO
DCM —Field Representative
7/1
DCM — LUP Consistency Determination
L
(Awl
Local Permit Officer
Corps of Engineers — Regulatory Branch
$ f
2-v I I —5a7l"
DWR-401 Section
to
2991q — 0
g(L
DWR—Public Water Supply
DEMLR — Stormwater Management
DEMLR — Sediment and Erosion
State Property Office
�/I
%`
Wildlife Resources Commission
Q 9
t�, ov i AAeJ
DMF — Shellfish Sanitation Section
7113
K
DMF — Habitat & Enhancement
DNCR— State Historic Preservation Office
8(19
>L
DNCR —Natural Heritage Program
NCDOT
DCA — Rural Economic Development
RIP SECTiCi' 4

ROY COOPER
Govenmr
MICHAEL S. REGAN
19 Secrc oy
BRAXTON DAVIS
NORTH CAROLINA Director, DhWoo of('oov.1
Lirvir'onmenfof Qmhn, Manogenreol
23 July 2019
MEMORANDUM:
FROM: Gregg Bodnar, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
NCDEQ - Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave., Morehead City, NC 28557
Fax: [phone] (Courier 04-16-33)
greaa. bodnar(cDncdenr.00v
SUBJECT: CAMA Major Permit Application Review
Applicant: Michael Richter
Project Location: 126 S. Ferry Dock Rd., Harkers Island
Proposed Project: Proposes to fill 609ft' of 404 wetlands to level yard to better access shoreline
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
return this form to Greaa Bodnar at the address above by 8113119. If you have any questions regarding the
proposed project, contact Ryan Davenport [phone] when appropriate, in-depth comments with
supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
"Additional comments may be attached"
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
PRINT NAME Valerie Wunderly for Shannon Jenkins
AGENCY DMF - Shellfish Sanitation
SIGNATURE61
DATE
7/23/2019
RECEIVED
JUL 2 3 2019
MP SECTION MHD
Stale or North Carolina I limironmental Quality 1 Coaalal Management
400 Conmmme Ave. Momhetal City, NC 28557 [phone]

ROY COOPER
Qmenw,
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Sttttlmy
BRAXTON DAVIS
Dinwor, Dmoal af('o¢s/al
Afaiogemenl
23 July 2019
M9ROANDUM.
FROM:
Gregg Bodnar, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
NCDEQ - Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave., Morehead City, NC 28557
Fax: [phone] (Courier 04-16.33)
greee bodnarnncdenr eov
SUBJECT:
CAMA Major Permit Application Review
Applicant:
Michael Richter
Project Location:
126 S. Ferry Dock Rd., Harkers Island
Proposed Project: Proposes to fill SOW of 404 wetlands to level yard to better access shoreline
Please Indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
-alum this form to Gregg Bodnar at the address above by 8113119. If you have any questions regarding the
Proposed project, contact Ryan Davenport [phone] when appropriate, in-depth comments with
supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
"Additional comments may be attached"
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
PRINT NAME W &*l(Stit4- Lk-( I r dtrd
AGENCY alt, W- &p,F
SIGNATURE JCL4t L&-
DATE _g - l - Z61 9
SmtedNodh Carolina I CnNrnnmental Qmiilyleoaslel Maaagemmt
400 Comtmlm Aix, Marchead City, NC 28551 [phone]
RZECEIVED
AUG 1 2019
NIP SECTION MH®

23 July, 2019
MEMORANDUM:
FROM: OregiliBadnar,Asslitant Mel6r,Perimits-Coordinator
NCDEO ibl.91slowofCoasial Management
4130 Commerce Ave., Morehead 10%,14C28557
Flax-; 252-2_47m=0.. 6 3
"$vWEGT.-' CAMA mpiprPorInit-Applicatioti RdWevit
Applicant: Michael.Rldhteir'
Projodt1odatl6he
Pfoposed'ProjOct:
..- , 1­ ­
sewetoryl
I Wqf'1P
126_& Ferry ;Dock Rd., H&KOW Island;
Proposes to,1111'609ft.2 of 40.4 wetlandleAc, lev*Yardl to bq(tbrqqcoqs shqrellne.
s position orMewpoint.on.the
the address:abolie IIY1/1.311
project and
have any,,qO,esfionsrjega[ding,the-
lh-depth.comments. with
REPLY: 1%�`This agency has no.objectlomto the project as proposed.
"Adoitio,niql�cor-nMents; may be attached
ThK.,poncy hmFho.cbminent 660e-proposed project.
Thi&ag ency.7approves:of the proJsct'o* if thQ,t.eqd.mm.ehded'changes
are lnc9rpqiated.;See.attached:
This agency objects to the: project for reasons -described in the attached comments.
PtNtL WoL RECEIVED
AUG 2 2019
MP SECTION MH D
Stale of Notth Carolina I Environmental Quality I Coastal Management
400 Corunme Am Morthead City, NC 7.9557 [phone]

Bodnar, Gregg
From:
Brownlow, Roy
Sent:
Thursday, July 18, 2019 11:06 AM
To:
Davenport, Ryan
Cc:
Bodnar, Gregg
Subject:
Staff Recommendations for Richter Filling Project Harkers Island
Ryan,
Please include the following in the staff recommendations for permit conditions on the
Michael Richter wetland fill project in Harkers Island:
• No excess fill, construction material, or debris shall be stockpiled or stored in any
wetlands or within 30' of normal high water.
• Filling and grading shall be done in manner which does not increase stormwater
runoff into the adjacent estuarine waters.
• The earthen fill material shall be clean material free of non -organic products, toxic
material, or any other deleterious substance.
• Place heavy equipment on mats or suitably operate the equipment to prevent
alteration'or damage to coastal wetlands and coastal wetland substrate.
• The fill material shall be immediately stabilized so there is no permanent loss of
coastal wetlands and any other non -coastal wetland. The graded and disturbed
areas shall be seeded, mulched, or sod placed immediately after construction
activities have been completed to prevent sediment runoff into adjacent wetlands
or waterbodies.
Roy B(OwnlOw
District Manager Division of Coastal Management p
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
252.808.2808 (Office)a..�
Roy.Brovmlow(a)ncdenr.cov
E m orrr4"dafre to and hcm Pis &khess is su4ixt to Yva lbfh ("aroma Ptk4c axads i YN1 rd
n1gy be &scbscd to tYrrdpagcs.
1

IN
Bodnar, Gre
From: Bodnar, Gregg
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2019 1:05 PM
!c
To: Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US)
Subject: FW: [External] 126 South Ferry Dock Road Harkers island.
Afternoon Liz,
After my discussion with Mr. Richter he has provided additional information in reference to your questions concerning
specs of the pipe and bridge. Please see below for Mr. Richter's answers to those questions.
Hope this helps,
Gregg
From: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2019 11:01 AM
To: Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail]>
Cc: 'Sam Bell' <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] 126 South Ferry Dock Road Harkers island.
Greg,
The following is a draft of my response to what I understand as the current questions. Greg, I say this is a draft,
because if there is any other item I should respond to, or further clarifications of these items, please let me
know. I will list the questions, with my response following.
1) What will be the grade of the drainage pipe? - The invert of the pipe will lie along the existing grade so as
not to change any waterflow patterns.
2) What is the weight of the vehicles that will be traveling over the area? Weight will be consistent with those
associated with a residential driveway. Accordingly the pipe will be installed in accordance with the
NCDOT drainage users manual for a private residence.
3) What is the depth of the coverage material over the pipe. Per the NCDOT manual the " Minimum fill
height for All types of pipe is 12 inches as measured from the top of the pipe to the top of soil". "Minimum
cover requirements are the same for all pipe material types unless used for Commercial Driveways." Pipe
will be install accordingly. The maximum cover for PVC or HDPE pipe is 20 feet. The actual depth will be
quite a bit less so the maximum depth does not come into consideration.
4) The size of the pipe was questioned. After review, the pipe can be upsized to 15"
5) Pipe material? The pipe used will be of pipe material approved for use for a private residence or residential
subdivision driveway culvert. HDPE pipe will come in longer sections than concrete pipe, making a
minimal number of joints..
6) Pipe Bedding? To eliminate any possibility of settling a 12" thick bed of #57 stone will be installed prior to
pipe installation.
7) Pricing? I put together the pricing based upon my experience, briefly - Civil Engineering degree from
NCSU, 37 years in various roles working for a NC unlimited unclassified ENR top 400 contractor
specializing in bridge, utilities, and building work. -last 5 years as President. Over the years have put

f 04
together and or reviewed pricing on projects easily exceeding I bill dollars., Currently retired, and hold a
NC Unlimited Building Contractor's license.
Greg, I will be glad to respond to any other questions that may be out there, or delete one of these items, i.e.
number 7 if you feel it is not important.
Sincerely
Mike Richter
Gi46 Virus -free. www.avq.com

Bodnar, Gregg
From: Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2019 2:15 PM
To: Mairs, Robb L; Bodnar, Gregg; Staples, Shane
Cc: Charles, Thomas P CIV USARMY CESAW (US); Davenport, Ryan
Subject: RE: [External] RE: Michael Richter
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Thanks Robb.
Gregg, as I mentioned earlier today, the proposal also does not have a purpose and need that we can permit. The
applicant can construct the bulkhead and level the low area of the yard and access the remainder of the high ground
property by bridge without impacting the wetland.
Let me know if you need additional information on the Corps' position.
Thanks!
Liz
-----Original Message -----
From: Mairs, Robb L [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2019 1:25 PM
To: Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US) <[e-mail]>; Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail]>;
Staples, Shane <[e-mail]>
Cc: Charles, Thomas P CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>; Davenport, Ryan
<[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: [External] RE: Michael Richter
Gregg,
We would support the Corps on this as well. This proposal would not meet the 401 avoidance and minimization criteria.
Thanks,
Robb
Robb Mairs
Environmental Specialist II
Division of Water Resources
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
910 796.7303 office
[e-mail]
Blocked https://d eq. nc.gov/a bout/divisions/water-resources/water-resources-perm its/wastewater-branch/401-
wetla nds-buffer-pe rm its

127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC28405
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed
to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2019 10:09 AM
To: Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail]>; Mairs, Robb L <[e-mail]>; Staples, Shane
<shane.sta pies@ ncden r.gov>
Cc: Charles, Thomas P CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>; Davenport, Ryan
<ryan.davenport@ ncdenr.gov>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: Michael Richter
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to repo [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Basically a denial, we do not permit yards.
Liz
-----Original Message ----
From: Bodnar, Gregg [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2019 8:29 AM
To: Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US) <[e-mail]>; Mairs, Robb L <[e-mail]>;
Staples, Shane <[e-mail]>
Cc: Charles, Thomas P CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>; Davenport, Ryan
<rya n.davenport@ ncdenr.gov>.
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: [External] RE: Michael Richter
Morning Liz,
Thanks for the update. When you mean withdrawing the application do you mean denial of the Corp permit or
requesting additional information concerning avoidance and minimization?
Gregg
-----Original Message -----
From: Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2019 5:43 PM
To: Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail]>; Mairs, Robb L <[e-mail]>; Weychert, Curtis R
<curt.weychert@ ncdenr.gov>
Cc: Charles, Thomas P CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] RE: Michael Richter
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to repo [e-mail]<maiIto: repo [e-mail]>

Wow ... I just looked at the application. No, No, No. He has not demonstrated avoidance and minimization and has
existing access to his yard and the sandy beach. He can build another wooden bridge over the wetland if he wants. I will
be withdrawing this application.
Liz
----Original Message -----
From: Bodnar, Gregg [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 8:04 AM
To: Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US) <[e-mail]>; Mairs, Robb L <[e-mail]>;
Weychert, Curtis R <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Michael Richter
Hey all,
I wanted to check in early on this one due to the fill of 404 for the purposes of leveling out the yard. I have another
project in Currituck that is similar that DWR and DMF have raised issue with. So I wanted to check in early and see
which way this might go.
Thanks,
Gregg

Bodnar, Gregg
From: Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2019 10:54 AM !� 4 i,W +5
To: Bodnar, Gregg 4`�' 8��`�
Subject: RE: [External] RE: DMF comments for Mr. Richter 1pk'��
Wot-�s
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Hey Gregg,
Wow ... sounds like you are going to have your hands full for awhile. Sorry about that, but congrats to Courtney!
I still have questions regarding the cost estimate, the size of the crossing (15X40) and installation method of the pipe
itself (the pipe would need to be installed in such a way that the flow and circulation of the wetland would not be
impaired). They need to show how the culvert would be stable, and would not be crushed/buried by the fill over time. A
rip rap base for the culvert to lay upon prior to backfill would be a way to stabilize.
The cost estimate seems pretty generic as I have no idea what kind of bridge was considered for the purpose of backing
a trailer with small boats down to the water. There was no cost/square foot and no mention of materials. A simple beam
bridge/girder bridge with piers or other small crossing would likely not be very expensive and would avoid filling the
wetland and potential hydrologic impacts on the adjacent property.
Where/who/what company did the numbers come from?
While the applicant has managed to reduce the amount of fill, I am still not convinced that a bridge is not a feasible
alternative to the fill.
Thanks,
Liz
-----Original Message -----
From: Bodnar, Gregg [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2019 10:19 AM
To: Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non -DOD Source] FW: [External] RE: DMF comments for Mr. Richter
Hey Liz,
Comments from Curt for the Richter redesign. I'm in the CRC meeting today but will be in the office on Friday if you
need to discuss. Let me know what your thinking when you can.

FYI Courtney is leaving DCM for Jessi Baker and Camp Lejeune starting October 15. So at some point very soon I will be
the only POC for DCM major permits.
Gregg
From: Weychert, Curtis R <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2019 10:08 AM
To: Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: DMF comments for Mr. Richter
Gregg, after reviewing the project history and Shane's previous comments, I have the following thoughts. While the
project has minimized the proposed fill impacts on wetlands, the fill could be avoided completely through bridging.
While the applicant has provided cost differences in the two proposed paths forward, economic concerns of projects do
not affect the decision and impacts to the habitat. If the purpose and need of this project is to stabilize the shoreline
and provide access to the water, the applicant has not justified a need to fill a 15' x 40' area. To access the water.
Additionally, there is SAV present along the shoreline which would justify the need to preserve the water quality in the
area, as SAV's are particularly susceptible to loss due to minor degradations in water quality. Creation of a bulkhead
along the shoreline will likely have negative effects on the adjacent SAV's already. .
I stand by Shane's initial comments that the proposed fill is unnecessary given that there are other alternatives that
would avoid the impacts to wetlands.
From: Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2019 11:40 AM
To: Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US) <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>;
Weychert, Curtis R <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >; Dunn, Maria T.
<[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>; Mairs, Robb L <[e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]> >
Cc: Davenport, Ryan <[e-mail]<maiIto: rya [e-mail]>>
Subject: FW: [External] RE: DMF comments for Mr. Richter
Morning all,
Sam bell from Stroud has supplied the above revisions and justification for the Michael Richter application. In summary
he has provided a cost estimate for a bridge versus fill and has a revised workplan where the fill has been reduced from
the original 609ft2 to 423ft2.

Please provide any feedback and I will pass along.
Thanks as always,
Gregg
From: Sam Bell <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Sent: Monday, September 09, 20193:14 PM
To: Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Cc: [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] RE: DMF comments for Mr. Richter
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
Afternoon Gregg,
Please see attached cost estimate and site plan -Rev 2 that address the comments and concerns that arose form the
initial application. To summarize the plan updates; the pipe was upsized to a traffic rated 12" corrugated pvc pipe and
the wetland fill area was reduced by roughly 25%. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,

Sam Bell, P.E.
Project Engineer
3302-C Bridges Street
Morehead City, NC 28557
252-247-7479 x224
Click here <BlockedhttPs:Hstroudengineer.sharefile.com/r-relodfdddc5b47b78> to upload files.
From: Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 1:04 PM
To: Sam Bell <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Subject: DMF comments for Mr. Richter
Afternoon Sam,
In line with the others, but wanted to pass along.
Thanks,
Gregg

�t
23 July 2019
MEMORANDUM:
FROM Gregg Bodnar, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
NCDEQ - Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave., Morehead City, NC 28557
Fax [phone] (Courier 04-16-33)
gregq. bodnar@ncdenr. oov
SUBJECT: CAMA Major Permit Application Review
ROY COOPER
Gmrmor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Se—rwy
BRAXTON DAVIS
Mrecror, 1AVLOM of(1n 402
Alm gement
Applicant: Michael Richter
Project Location: 126 S. Ferry Dock Rd., Harkers Island
Proposed Project: Proposes to fill 609141 of 404 wetlands to level yard to better access shoreline
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
return this form to Gregg Bodnar at the address above by 8113119. If you have any questions regarding the
proposed project, contact Ryan Davenport [phone] when appropriate, in-depth comments with
supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
"Additional comments may be attached"
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
PRINT NAME f�F
AGENCY_
SIGNATURE
DATE �-i 2l /, I
RECEIVED
AUG 2 2019
MP SECTION MHa
Slate ofNWhCwu1im I Emimnnw.1a1Qwi1y;Coeu1Management
400 Commerce A%c. Morehead City, NC 285A [phone]
RECEIVED
JUL 2 3 2019
DCM-MHD CITY

d' .'N
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
secrerafy
BRAXTON C. DAVIS
Dfrecror
MEMORANDUM
NORTH CAROLINA
Envlronmentof Quality
TO: Gregg Bodnar, Asst. Major Permits Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
FROM: Rachel Love-Adrick, District Planner ,/IJ1/f
Division of Coastal Management ,"�,1 "
SUBJECT: Major Permit Application by Michael Richter
Date: August 2, 2019
Consistency Determination: The request is consistent with/not in conflict with Carteret County Land Use
Plan certified by the CRC on December 20, 2010.
Overview: The project is located at 126 S. Ferry Dock Rd, Harkers Island, Carteret County. The property is
18,099 ft2 in its entirety and has an existing single family home. The property has ACOE and Coastal
wetlands situated between the house and the beach, an existing 6' wide bridge crossed the wetlands
proving access to the shoreline. The applicant is proposing to create earthen access to the shoreline by
placing 609 ftZ (15 'X 40') of fill material in ACOE jurisdictional wetlands. The project would also include a
103' bulkhead along the southern boundary of the fill area, a 1' x 28' culvert would be located beneath
the full area to provide drainage. On high ground, 2'000ft2 would be graded for landscaping.
AECs onsite include Estuarine Shoreline. The surface water classifications of Back Sound are SA (Market
Shellfishing, Salt Water) and ORW (Outstanding Resource Water). The site is not designated as a Primary
Nursery Area, and is open to the harvest of shellfish. A review of SAV, and historic/cultural resources was
not provided.
Anticipated impacts
This project would result in the filling of 609ft2 of ACOE jurisdictional wetlands. The finished grade in the
fill area would be at the same level or higher than adjacent natural grade. This could alter the local
drainage patterns and could result in water level changes. Earthen fill and sediment deposition from this
fill project could impact adjacent coastal wetlands without proper sedimentation barriers. There could
be impacts to the adjacent coastal wetland substrate during the mechanized filling and grading process.
RECEIVED
�DKQ
AUG 2 2019
MP SECTION tiRhO
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Coastal Management
Morehead City Office 1 400 Commerce Avenue I Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
252,808,2808

r 1 . 1
Basis for Determination:
The project site is subject to the 2005 Carteret County Land Use Plan Update. The Future Land Use Map
(FLUM) designates the site as Limited Transition (land) and Conservation (Non -coastal wetlands 404/401
or jurisdictional wetlands and Areas of Environmental Concern). Uses allowed in Areas of Environmental
Concern are those consistent with the State's minimum use standards and state and federal regulations.
The following LUP policies may be applicable to this request:
Policy 2.1
Carteret County's policies for development in coastal and non -coastal ("404," "401," or jurisdictional)
wetlands are as follow:
3. Carteret County concurs with state and federal standards for residential, commercial, and
industrial development in freshwater wetlands except as prohibited by this plan.
4. Carteret County will cooperate with the. U.S. Anny Corps of Engineers in the
regulation/enforcement of the "404" wetlands permit process. The County will require
that areas of non -coastal wetlands be shown on all new subdivision plats.
Policy 2.2
Carteret County's policies for development in coastal shoreline areas are as follow:
2. Carteret County will allow all uses (such as residential, commercial, industrial, and
institutional) in estuarine shoreline and ORW estuarine shoreline areas, provided all
local, state, and federal standards are satisfied.
RECEIVE
AUG 2 2019
MP SECTION MHD
L'Ti 1,MiY� N F11.Y W MNIi 0u��
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Coastal Management
Morehead City Office 1 400 Commerce Avenue i Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
252.808.2808

0
Received: 07/25/2019
•
State Historic Preservation Office ROY COOPER
_
Golymm
��.
MICHAEL S. REGAN
s<ewory
BRAXTON DAVIS
NORM CAROLINA
Dlr a, Dnbim ofCowtu7
F nwnwn.wra!f3uuLrr
hfanagnent
23 July 2019 ER 19-2331
MEMORANDUM:
Due -- 8/9/19
FROM: Gregg Bodnar, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
NCDEQ - Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave., Morehead City_, NC 28557
Fax:[phone] (Cour1er04.16-93J
greoo bodnar(t edenr.aov �
SUBJECT: CA MA Major Permit Application Review o t 6I 1
Applicant: Michael Richter
Project Location: 126 S. Ferry Dock Rd., Harkers Island
Proposed Project: Proposes to fill 609ft2 of 404 wetlands to level yard to better access shoreline
Please Indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
return this form to Gregg Bodnar at the address above by 8113119, If you have any questions regarding the
proposed project, contact Ryan Davenport [phone] when appropriate, in-depth comments with
supporting data Is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
"Additional comments may be attached"
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only If the recommended'changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
PRINTNailn ERenee- Gledhill -Earley
AGENCY State Historic Preservvattionn, Office
§IGNATl1RE �� � l�R�t
DATE
ECE8IVED
AUG 1 9 2019
MP SECTION MHD
State of Nmh Carolina I Fnvironmemal Quality I Coaad %( mgmenl
400 Cammcrce Ave. Morehead City, NC 28557 [phone] JUL 2 6 2019

JUL 2 4 2019
FROM: Gregg Bodnar, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
NCDEQ - Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave,,__ Morehead City, NC 26557
Fax: [phone]CQUPIa9�alB
greaa.bodnar(Wricdenr.cov
SUBJECT: CAMA Major Permit Application Review
ROY COOPER
GaVC.r
MICHAEL S. REGAN
8-v Il y
BRAXTON DAVIS
Dlwwr, Mmkw pfc ttw
A'w.vmM
Applicant: Michael Richter
Project Location: 126 S. Ferry Dock Rd., Harkers Island
Proposed Project: Proposes to fill 609ft' of 404 wetlands to level yard to better access shoreline
Please Indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
nstum this form to Gregg Bodnar at the address above by 8113119. If you have any questions regarding the
proposed project, contact Ryan Davenport [phone] when appropriate, in-depth comments with
supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
"Additional comments may be attached"
This agency has no'comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
_ This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments,
AMOY i�� ,c RECEIVE®
scyturti: AUG 1 9 2019
rear 9 /� MP SECTION MHD
Sww ofNorlh Caroline I Linvlmmxmwl Qaelily I Comtal Mmagamant
400 Cownlcma Ma. M-WIMd Qy, NC U357 (252) Sn•2903

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Seawtury
STEPHEN W.MURPHEY
Dkre
MEMORANDUM:
TO:
Gregg Bodnar, DCM Assistant Major Permit Coordinator
FROM:
Shane Staples, DMF Fisheries Resource Specialist
THROUGH:
Anne Deaton, DMF Habitat Assessment Manager
SUBJECT:
Michael Richter - Wetland Fill, Harker's Island
DATE:
8/19/19
The CAMA application has been reviewed by a fisheries resources specialist for the NCDMF
for impacts that may affect fisheries resources of the state. The applicant proposes to fill
approximately 609 square feet of delineated USACE 404-wetlands in a residential
subdivision in Harker's Island adjacent to Back Sound.
NCDMF has concerns with the project as currently proposed due to the potential for
wetland fill activities such as this to negatively impact fisheries habitat by degradation of
water quality. The project shows little minimization of impacts and access to the waters.
While wetlands such as this are not used as a direct fish habitat, the ecological functions
they provide are no less important. Wetlands, especially in the riparian corridor, enhance
water quality by fixing nutrients in the soil and removing sediment and pollutants.
Additionally, wetlands improve shoreline resiliency during storm events by retaining water
and slowing runoff. These ecosystem services enhance water quality conditions for
juvenile and adult fish. NCDMF recommends that the applicant minimize the impacts to
wetlands by reducing the area to be filled. Impacts could be reduced by bridging or simply
reducing the fill to wide enough to allow for a footpath to access the water.
Contact Shane Staples at [phone] or shane.staplesftcdenrgov with further
questions or concerns.
RECEIVED
AUG 1 9 2019
MP SECTION MH©
State of Nwth CamBna I Diviraoatof Marine Fsherles
3441 Arenddl Street I P.O. Box 7691 Morehead City, North Uana 2B551
252-726-7021

Bodnar, Gregg
From: Weychert, Curtis R
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2019 10:08 AM j
To: Bodnar, Gregg,SGClbs+twY+�
Subject: RE: [External] RE: DMF comments for Mr. Richteree,mav(Z8//9
Categories: Important (" ttow,g
Gregg, after reviewing the project history and Shane's previous comments, I have the following thoughts. While the
project has minimized the proposed fill impacts on wetlands, the fill could be avoided completely through
bridging. While the applicant has provided cost differences in the two proposed paths forward, economic concerns of
projects do not affect the decision and impacts to the habitat. If the purpose and need of this project is to stabilize the
shoreline and provide access to the water, the applicant has not justified a need to fill a 15' x 40' area. To access the
water. Additionally, there is SAV present along the shoreline which would justify the need to preserve the water quality
in the area, as SAV's are particularly susceptible to loss due to minor degradations in water quality. Creation of a
bulkhead along the shoreline will likely have negative effects on the adjacent SAV's already.
I stand by Shane's initial comments that the proposed fill is unnecessary given that there are other alternatives that
would avoid the impacts to wetlands.
From: Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2019 11:40 AM
To: Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US) <[e-mail]>; Weychert, Curtis R
<[e-mail]>; Dunn, Maria T. <[e-mail]>; Mairs, Robb L <[e-mail]>
Cc: Davenport, Ryan <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: [External] RE: DMF comments for Mr. Richter
Morning all,
Sam bell from Stroud has supplied the above revisions and justification for the Michael Richter application. In summary
he has provided a cost estimate for a bridge versus fill and has a revised workplan where the fill has been reduced from
the original 609ft2 to 423ft2.
Please provide any feedback and I will pass along.
Thanks as always,
Gregg
Gregg Bodnar
Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
AE Q�Division of Coastal Management
�r. ate., m� �I Department of Environmental Quality
""i1O"" 252 808 2808 ext 215 (Office)
V Gre¢[e-mail]
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Low and may be disclosed to third parties.

From: Sam Bell <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2019 3:14 PM
To: Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: [External] RE: DMF comments for Mr. Richter
Afternoon Gregg,
Please see attached cost estimate and site plan -Rev 2 that address the comments and concerns that arose form the
initial application. To summarize the plan updates; the pipe was upsized to a traffic rated 12" corrugated pvc pipe and
the wetland fill area was reduced by roughly 25%. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Sam Bell, P.E.
Project Engineer
3302-C Bridges Street
Morehead City, NC 28557
252-247-7479 x224
Click here to upload files.
From: Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 1:04 PM
To: Sam Bell <[e-mail]>
Subject: DMF comments for Mr. Richter
Afternoon Sam,
In line with the others, but wanted to pass along.
Thanks,
Gregg

Bodnar, Gregg
From:
Sent:
Dunn, Maria T.
Monday, October 07, 2019 7:58 AM
To: Bodnar, Gregg
Subject: RE: [External] 126 South Ferry Dock Road Harkers island.
I'm good. I guess sometimes I just see a jump past the point.
I hope you have a good week. I'm sure you'll be hearing from me.
-----Original Message -----
From: Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2019 7:56 AM
To: Dunn, Maria T. <[e-mail]>; Mairs, Robb L <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] 126 South Ferry Dock Road Harkers island.
IZt c,4�r( I '14.c k
Based on Liz's comments below she is happy. I contacted Curt by phone and has not responded yet.
Gregg
-----Original Message -----
From: Dunn, Maria T. <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2019 4:41 PM
To: Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail]>; Mairs, Robb L <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] 126 South Ferry Dock Road Harkers island.
He gives good answers to the questions, but I still have problem with the purpose and need. He is replacing a foot bridge
with a NCDOT grade culvert and fill so he can drive the approximately 60' to the shoreline? I'm not sure why he needs to
do this really, it doesn't seem to be associated with a water dependent activity. As I said, he addressed the questions of
why he is approaching the project as he is structurally, I just didn't see him answer purpose and need very well. Perhaps
he did so with USACE.
My non -regulatory agency response.
-----Original Message -----
From: Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2019 8:58 AM
To: Dunn, Maria T. <[e-mail]>; Mairs, Robb L <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: [External] 126 South Ferry Dock Road Harkers island.
Morning all,
See below for an email exchange from Mr. Richter regarding some questions Liz posed after the redesign which reduced
the fill of 404 wetlands that was circulated last month. Curt is reviewing currently and I wanted to get your opinions on
this so I can update the applicant.
Thanks,

Gregg
-----Original Message -----
From: Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2019 2:32 PM
To: Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] 126 South Ferry Dock Road Harkers island.
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail]<maiIto: repo rt.spam @ nc.gov>
Ok-think we are good to go. Just need a revised plan showing the changes and I can issue.
Thanks for all your help with getting my questions answered.
Liz
-----Original Message -----
From: Bodnar, Gregg [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2019 1:05 PM
To: Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] FW: [External] 126 South Ferry Dock Road Harkers island.
Afternoon Liz,
After my discussion with Mr. Richter he has provided additional information in reference to your questions concerning
specs of the pipe and bridge. Please see below for Mr. Richter's answers to those questions.
Hope this helps,
Gregg
From: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2019 11:01 AM
To: Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail]>
Cc: 'Sam Bell' <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] 126 South Ferry Dock Road Harkers island.
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>

Greg,
The following is a draft of my response to what I understand as the current questions. Greg, I say this is a draft, because
if there is any other item I should respond to, or further clarifications of these items, please let me know. I will list the
questions, with my response following.
1. What will be the grade of the drainage pipe? - The invert of the pipe will lie along the existing grade so as not to
change any waterflow patterns.
2. What is the weight of the vehicles that will be traveling over the area? Weight will be consistent with those
associated with a residential driveway. Accordingly the pipe will be installed in accordance with the NCDOT drainage
users manual for a private residence.
3. What is the depth of the coverage material over the pipe. Per the NCDOT manual the " Minimum fill height for All
types of pipe is 12 inches as measured from the top of the pipe to the top of soil". "Minimum cover requirements are
the same for all pipe material types unless used for Commercial Driveways." Pipe will be install accordingly. The
maximum cover for PVC or HDPE pipe is 20 feet. The actual depth will be quite a bit less so the maximum depth does not
come into consideration.
4. The size of the pipe was questioned. After review, the pipe can be upsized to 15"
5. Pipe material? The pipe used will be of pipe material approved for use for a private residence or residential
subdivision driveway culvert. HDPE pipe will come in longer sections than concrete pipe, making a minimal number of
joints..
6. Pipe Bedding? To eliminate any possibility of settling a 12" thick bed of #57 stone will be installed prior to,pipe
installation.
7. Pricing? I put together the pricing based upon my experience, briefly - Civil Engineering degree from NCSU, 37
years in various roles working for a NC unlimited unclassified ENR top 400 contractor specializing in bridge, utilities, and
building work. -last 5 years as President. Over the years have put together and or reviewed pricing on projects easily
exceeding 1 bill dollars., Currently retired, and hold a NC Unlimited Building Contractor's license.
Greg, I will be glad to respond to any other questions that may be out there, or delete one of these items, i.e. number 7
if you feel it is not important.
Sincerely
Mike Richter
<Blockedhttp://www.avg.com/ema i I-signature?utm_med ium=ema i l&utm_so u rce=link&utm_cam paign=sig-
email&utm content=emailclient>
Virus -free. Blockedwww.avg.com <Blockedhttp://www.avg.com/email-
signature?utm_medium=ema i t&utm_so u rce=link&utm_ca m pa ign=sig-ema i t&utm_conte nt=ema ilclient>

Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
parties.

23 July 2019
MEMORANDUM,:;
FROM`.
SUBJECT:
Applicant',
Project,Location;
ROY COOPER
Cim.,nor
M:ICHAEL S. R13GAN
Sccmrury,
i
BRAXTON DAVIS
ljffYtFot, pl,'!Jf(n+nfrtMYfnl�
it
,41?nng.n+crN
1
♦ i`i. d�.26, n 1
titiZ"�A25262I6
ti
P1L 2019
Gregg Bodnar, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
o ytpt"
r Plt' K
NCDEQ - Division of'Coastal Management
p O
400 Commerce Aver, Morehead City,. NC 28557
nr-n nay anon in.,...,..L llh_�R_R71
S c11
S-�'rilit
Fzs. ..
Permit Application Review
Michael Richter
i
i
126 S. Ferry Dock Rd., Harkers<Island
Pfoposed Project:, Proposes
Pleaseindicatebelow you,r ager
is
of 404'wetlands to level yard to better access shoreline
s position or viewpoint on the proposed' project and
the address above by 8113119.. If you have any questions. regarding the
rport [phone] when appropriate, in-depth.comments with
REPLY: This agency has, no'objection :to the project as proposed.
--Additional comments may attached *
This agency has no comment on the, proposed project.
this .agency approves ofthe project only ifthe recommended changes -
are
incorporated, See attached.
to the projectJorreasons described in the attached comments.
AGENCY; ri (�12-C
SIGNATURE
PATE'-7ti7t `l
Carolina i En4iranmenlal Quality I coaad Manareinent
clime Arc. MmlieW 651y, NC 28557 (252) 868-Z8m
11
AUG 1 2 2019
PAP SECTION Mil®

® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Gregg Bodnar RECEIVED
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
AUG 1 2 2019
FROM: Maria T. Du, Coastal Coordinator^
Dunn, MP SECTION MHD
Habitat Conservation Division
DATE: August 9, 2019
SUBJECT: CAMA Dredge/Fill Permit Application for Michael Richter, Carteret County,
North Carolina.
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) reviewed the permit
application with regard to impacts on fish and wildlife resources. The project site is located at 126 S.
Ferry Dock Road, Harkers Island, NC. Our comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the
Coastal Area Management Act (G.S. 113A-100 through 113A-128), as amended, Sections 401 and 404 of
the Clean Water Act, as amended, and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended;
16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.).
The applicant proposes to fill 609 ft2 of Section 404 wetlands to level the yard to better access the
shoreline. Coastal wetlands in the would not be directly impacted but are adjacent to the fill. A 103'
retaining wall will be constructed to prevent material from being deposited on neighboring property. A 1'
by 28' culvert would be installed to allow hydrologic connectivity. Back Sound in this location is
classified SA ORW by the Environmental Management Commission and is open to shellfish harvesting.
The NCWRC has reviewed the permit application and has concern with the wetland fill, including direct
and indirect impacts. Wetlands provide important habitat opportunities for numerous wildlife species as
well as serve as an important filtration system for stormwater runoff. In addition to the loss of habitat
function, the fill of wetlands or installation of inadequately sized culverts can lead to culvert failure or the
backing up of flood waters. Due to these reasons and importance of wetlands, the NCWRC does not
support the fill of wetlands without a purpose and need that demonstrates avoidance and minimization of
wetland impacts. We understand that for some water dependent structures, access, utilities setback, or
construction, wetland impacts may be necessary and can be allowed after demonstration of avoidance and
minimization. Those parameters do not appear to be demonstrated within this permit application. To
Mailing Address: Habitat Conservation • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

ft
minimize wetland fill, the potential of adjacent coastal wetland fill, runoff into surface waters, and
potential increased flooding, we encourage the applicant to consider options that would be less impactful,
such as a small bridge or crosswalk over the wetland area.
The NCWRC appreciates the opportunity to review and comment on this permit application. If you need
further assistance or additional information, please contact me at [phone] or at
maria dutur(ahicwildlife.ors
RECEIVED
AUG 1 2 2019
MP SECTION MHD

Bodnar, Gregg
From: Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2019 2:32 PM
To: Bodnar, Gregg
Subject: RE: [External] 126 South Ferry Dock Road Harkers island.
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Ok-think we are good to go. Just need a revised plan showing the changes and I can issue.
Thanks for all your help with getting my questions answered.
Liz
-----Original Message -----
From: Bodnar, Gregg [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2019 1:05 PM
To: Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] FW: [External] 126 South Ferry Dock Road Harkers island.
Afternoon Liz,
After my discussion with Mr. Richter he has provided additional information in reference to your questions concerning
specs of the pipe and bridge. Please see below for Mr. Richter's answers to those questions.
Hope this helps,
G regg
From: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2019 11:01 AM
To: Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail]>
Cc: 'Sam Bell' <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] 126 South Ferry Dock Road Harkers island.
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>

Greg,
The following is a draft of my response to what I understand as the current questions. Greg, I say this is a draft, because
if there is any other item I should respond to, or further clarifications of these items, please let me know. I will list the
questions, with my response following.
1. What will be the grade of the drainage pipe? - The invert of the pipe will lie along the existing grade so as not to
change any waterflow patterns.
2. What is the weight of the vehicles that will be traveling over the area? Weight will be consistent with those
associated with a residential driveway. Accordingly the pipe will be installed in accordance with the NCDOT drainage
users manual for a private residence.
3. What is the depth of the coverage material over the pipe. Per the NCDOT manual the " Minimum fill height for All
types of pipe is 12 inches as measured from the top of the pipe to the top of soil". "Minimum cover requirements are
the same for all pipe material types unless used for Commercial Driveways." Pipe will be install accordingly. The
maximum cover for PVC or HDPE pipe is 20 feet. The actual depth will be quite a bit less so the maximum depth does not
come into consideration.
4. The size of the pipe was questioned. After review, the pipe can be upsized to 15"
S. Pipe material? The pipe used will be of pipe material approved for use for a private residence or residential
subdivision driveway culvert. HDPE pipe will come in longer sections than concrete pipe, making a minimal number of
joints..
6. Pipe Bedding? To eliminate any possibility of settling a 12" thick bed of #57 stone will be installed prior to pipe
installation.
7. Pricing? I put together the pricing based upon my experience, briefly - Civil Engineering degree from NCSU, 37
years in various roles working for a NC unlimited unclassified ENR top 400 contractor specializing in bridge, utilities, and
building work. -last 5 years as President. Over the years have put together and or reviewed pricing on projects easily
exceeding 1 bill dollars., Currently retired, and hold a NC Unlimited Building Contractor's license.
Greg, I will be glad to respond to any other questions that may be out there, or delete one of these items, i.e. number 7
if you feel it is not important.
Sincerely
Mike Richter
<Blocked http://www.avg.co m/ema i I-signature?utm_medium=ema i I&utm_so u rce=li n k&utm_cam paign=sig-
email&utm content=emailclient>
Virus -free. Blockedwww.avg.com <BlockedhttP://www.avg.com/email-
signatu re? utm_m ed i u m=e ma i I & utm_source=link& utm_campaign=s ig-e ma i I&utm_co me nt=e ma i Icl ie nt>

Bodnar Gregg
From: Mairs, Robb L
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2019 11:39 AM
To: Bodnar, Gregg
Subject: RE: Projects
Hey Gregg,
As discussed, Batts should be DWR 20191237 and Reif should be DWR 20191235.
Long week. Hope you have a good weekend.
Robb
From: Bodnar, Gregg
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2019 10:00 AM
To: Mairs, Robb L <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Projects
Thanks for the update.
Gregg
From: Mairs, Robb L<robb [e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2019 9:59 AM
To: Bodnar, Gregg <gregg [e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Projects
Gregg,
Here are couple of corrections:
Michael Richter- This will require written approval (Correction DWR # 2019-1073) through our GC 4175. Approval letter
will follow.
William Rayner- Correction on DWR (#2019-1238)
Thanks,
From: Mairs, Robb L
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 2:24 PM
To: Bodnar, Gregg <gregg [e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Projects
Gregg,
1

Please see below next to applicants.
To
From: Bodnar, Gregg
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 10:52 AM
To: Mairs, Robb L <robb.mairs ncdenr.aov>
Subject: Projects
Hey Rob,
I'm trying to get a handle on outstanding comments from the Wilmington office...
Rayner, William - This will not require written approval (DWR 20191073)
Richter, Michael -This will not require written approval (DWR 20191238)
Yusko, Mark -This will require written approval (DWR 2019123B) through our GC-4175
Reif, Robert - This will not require written approval (DWR 20191237)
Batt's Properties LLC -This will not require written approval (DWR 20191235)
Sorry if you've already sent something in or if I've asked recently,
Gregg
c•REQ
woo T.141. VOVrm. W-- f�
I Gregg Bodnar
Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
Department of Environmental Quality
252 808 2808 ext 215 (Office)
Grege.Bodna [e-mail]
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Low and may be disclosed to third parties.

i
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2013-00757 County: Carteret County U.S.G.S. Quad: Harkers Island
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Pennittee: Michael Richter RE C � 1V' D
Address: 211 Stratford Road
Goldsboro NC. 27534 O C I 2 1 20'
mprichter(demail.com
Telephone Number: 919-580-8469 PA P v E CT I C ANI r,^ t "
Size (acres) —0.42 acre
Nearest Waterway Back Sound
USGS HUC 03020301
Nearest Town Harkers Island
River Basin Onslow Bay
Coordinates Latitude: 34.6940712245253
Longitude:-76.560391484965
Location description: The project site is located in wetlands at a property located at 126 Ferry Dock Road. in Barkers Island.
Carteret County, North Carolina.
Description of projects area and activity:
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number and/or Nationwide Permit Number: NWP 18
SEE ATTACHED RGP or NWP GENERAL, REGIONAL AND/OR SPECIAL CONDITTONS
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted application and attached information dated July 23, 2019 and revised plans dated October 4,
2019. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop
work order, a restoration order, a Class I administrative penalty, and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide and/or regional general permit
authorization is modified, suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide and/or regional
general permit authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below,
provided it complies with all requirements of the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide and/or regional general permit
authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would no longer comply with the terms and
conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction) or are under contract to
continence in reliance upon the nationwide and/or regional general permit, will remain authorized provided the activity is completed
within twelve months of the date of the nationwide and/or regional general permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised on a case -by -case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Resources (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone].
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact Sarah Hair at (910) 2514049 or Sarah.E.Hair(dusace.armv.miL

HAIR.SARAH.E punsAM519=e.iosas9rstx
Corps Regulatory Official: A.1054693512 °:`•m�°'°''°'1e1oBi� Date: October 18. 2019
Expiration Date of Verification: March 18, 2022
A. Determination of Jurisdiction:
1. ❑ There are waters, including wetlands, on the above described project area that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivets and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part
331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further
instruction. Please note, if work is authorized by either a general or nationwide permit, and you wish to request an appeal of an
approved JD, the appeal must be received by the Corps and the appeal process concluded prior to the commencement of any
work in waters of the United States and prior to any work that could alter the hydrology of waters of the United States.
2. ❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements
of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC §
1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years from the date of this notification.
3. ❑ There are waters, including wetlands, within the above described project area that are subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
4. ❑ Ajurisdiction determination was not completed with this request. Therefore, this is not an appealable action. However, you
may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps for further instruction.
5. ® The aquatic resources within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please
reference the approved jurisdictional determination issued June 7, 2013. Action 1D: SAW-2013-00757.
B. Basis For Jurisdictional Determination: See the Approved JD described in Section A5 above.
C. Remarks: JD expired June 7, 2018.
D. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
E. Appeals Information for Approved Jurisdiction Determinations (as indicated in A2 and A3 above).
If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Pan 331. Enclosed
you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and Request for Appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address: RECEIVED
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Philip Shannin, Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
OCT 2 1 2019
Phone: [phone] MP SECTION MHD
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR pan 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by , _ = .

It is not necessary to submit an RF9 form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the higbest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
http://'corpsmai)u.usace.army.mil/cm apex/f?1)=136:4:0.
Copy famished:
Mr. Gregg Bodnar -NC DEQ-DCM
Mr. Robb Mairs-NC DEQ-DWR
Mr. Sam Belt -Stroud Engineering
0CT 2 1 2019
MP SECTION MH®

1'
Action ID Number: SAW-2013-00757 County: Carteret County
Permittee: Michael Richter
Project Name: 126 Ferry Dock Road/Michael Richter/jurisdictional determination
Date Verification Issued: October 18, 2019
Project Manager: Sarah Hair
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit,
sign this certification and return it to the following address:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Attn: Sarah Hair
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers representative. Failure to comply with any terms or conditions of this authorization may
result in the Corps suspending, modifying or revoking the authorization and/or issuing a Class I
administrative penalty, or initiating other appropriate legal action.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in
accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee
Date
RECEIVED
OCi 2 1 2019
MP SECTION MND

x,FxEF3 .
W■YI
+em. fl
SiCx Scv
VICWITY
MAP
wag
m
Ie�
m
A
N
CO
CROSS SECTION
SALE: ll:SH
SHEET -1 OF I
PROJECT •: 3004-001
DESIGN FILE •: PN3007-001 2D-TevGdgn
HIGH GPGuvD -�
FILL
FEMO0 E fi.. GET
I YSXTeLL '-b LF
A
15 HOPE CRIUAGE "ETLAUD�
PIPE INVERT TO LIE FILL
BE HE AlEXISITUG GRADE WITH
3' EMBEHT - BED
NI TH I]" OF E57 STONE
OR EQUIVALENT
HIGH GROUND
FLL
FWWDATION ELEVATION
CDASTAL WETLANS
UP LANO FILL 959 SF
RETAIN EXISTING
/CRAINAGE OJT FALL
#Oi WETLAND FILL 42.f SF
INSTALL 94 LF
SILT FENCE
Al _
DA HE
pd�ti
°kl5'YIMC CDNC.
` NOW 001"
Ay,
B
H�
°!ti r V/fS
T�35j9J�z,99 y N N
W q
CP A4•
P
�=z5 13'
xE TL.xG3 PRELIMINARY
MICHAEL P. RICHT-'R
126 S. FERRY DOCK ROAD - HARKERS ISLAND, NC
- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
C6,<0< F ISO S n3 TI F 36T PIN i95,4R 1566
CLIENT: MICHAEL P. RICHTER
DESIGNED:
sae
ADDRESS: "I STPAIFIWD RDAD
CMCS60RO. xG P5]<
UNAYN'
SJB
PHONE: 919-56U-6C69
CHECKED:
20 0 20 1D
STROU➢ ENGINEERING,PA
APPROVED:
]WIL SWWES SRIEET
WVEHENCItt.NG:B55T
amm-Tory LK£XSE HO.CMII
____
DATE:
1014119
..
SCALE L" - 20'
ECALf:
SAN BFl1,P£
1 e20'

Bodnar Gregg
From: Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2019 7:57 AM
To: Bodnar, Gregg
Subject: Re: [Non-DoD Source] RE: [External] Richter NWP 18 Corps tearsheet
No mitigation
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
--------Original message --------
From: "Bodnar, Gregg" <[e-mail]>
Date: 10/21/19 07:55 (GMT-05:00)
To: "Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US)" <[e-mail]>, "Mairs, Robb L" <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: [External] Richter NWP 18 Corps tearsheet
Hey Liz,
Just want to verify, are you requiring any mitigation in the NWP 18?
Gregg
-----Original Message -----
From: Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2019 5:22 PM
To: Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail]>; Mairs, Robb L <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] Richter NWP 18 Corps tearsheet
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail]<maiIto: [e-mail]>
For your records, please see attached Corps verification letter and revised plans dated October 4, 2019.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks!
Liz,Hair
Regulatory Project Manager
Wilmington District
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue

DocuSign Envelope ID: FD078E94-4942-4263-A2B5-6OA8B5BEB6DB
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Director
Michael P. Richter
211 Stratford Road
Goldsboro, NC 27534
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
October 31, 2019
OCT 3 1 2019
10P SECTION WID
DWR # 2019-1073
Carteret County
Subject: APPROVAL OF 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION WITH ADDITIONAL
CONDITIONS
126 S. Ferry Dock Road- Harkers Island
Dear Mr. Richter:
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) has received a copy of your CAMA Major application request
dated received on August 9, 2019, and sequential information received on October 7, 2019. DWR
issues approval in the form of a Water Quality Certification (WQC) in conjunction with the CAMA
Major Permit application, and the Nationwide Permit No. 18 when issued by the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE). This Certification allows you to use the CAMA Major Permit when the Division
of Coastal Management issues it.
In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or local
permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment
Control, Non -discharge, and stormwater regulations. Also, this approval to proceed with your
proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 Permit. This Certification can also be found on line at:
http: //portal.ncdeni-.org/web/`wa /swp /ws /401/401/certsandpelwits.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change
your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is
thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the
future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be
required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the
conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. This approval is for the purpose and design described in your application. The plans and
specifications for this project are incorporated by reference as part of the Certification. If you
change your project, you must notify the Division and you may be required to submit a new
application package with the appropriate fee. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given
D_EQ� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Wilmington Regional Office 1127 Cardinal Drive Extension I Wilmington, North Carolina 28405
910.796.7215

DocuSign Envelope ID: FD078E94-0942-4263-A2B5-60A8BSBEB6DB
a copy of this approval letter and General Certification and is responsible for complying with all
conditions. Any new owner must notify the Division and request the Certification be issued in their
name {15A NCAC 02H .0501 and .0502).
2. Any final construction plans for this project must include or reference the application and
plans approved by the Division under this authorization letter and certification. The applicant will
also be required to evaluate all acquired permits to assure that they are consistent and all relative
impacts are accounted for and shown on the construction plans. [15A NCAC 02H .0502 (b) and 15A
NCAC 02H .0506 (4)] The applicant shall require his contractors (and/or agents) to comply with all
of the terms of this Certification, and shall provide each of its contractors (and/or agents) a copy of
this Certification.
3. A pre -construction meeting is recommended to be held with the Division prior to the start
of the project phases so that the contractors and/or agents fully understand the conditions
associated with this certification. [15A NCAC 02H .0507 (c) and 15A NCAC 02H .0502 (e)]
4. Turbidity Standard
The turbidity standard of 25 NTUs (Nephelometric Turbidity Units) shall not be exceeded as
described in 15 A NCAC 213.0220. Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices must be used
to meet this standard. Turbidity curtains shall be used as appropriate. Please notify this Office if
any turbidity issues arise at 910.796.7215
S. All wetlands, streams, surface waters, and riparian buffers located within 50 feet of the
construction area on the project site shall be clearly marked (example- orange fabric fencing) prior
to any land disturbing activities and must be maintained on the property until the project phase is
completed. [15A NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(2) and (c)(2) and 15A NCAC 02H .0507 (c)]
6. Appropriate measures should be installed prior to any land clearing activities to protect
waters and wetlands from turbidity and/ or sedimentation. These measures should be routinely
inspected and properly maintained, and excavated materials should be contained outside the
wetland boundary. Excessive silt and sediment loads can have numerous detrimental effects on
aquatic resources including destruction of spawning habitat, suffocation of eggs, and clogging of
gills of aquatic species. [15A NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(3) and (c)(3)]
7. This General Certification shall expire on the same day as the expiration date of the
corresponding General Permit. The conditions in effect on the date of issuance of the Certification
for a specific project shall remain in effect for the life of the project, regardless of the expiration of
this Certification.
8. The permittee shall require its contractors and/or agents to comply with the terms of this
permit in the construction and maintenance of this project, and shall provide each of its contractors
and/or agents associated with the construction or maintenance of this project a copy of this
certification. A copy of this certification including all conditions shall be available at the project site
during the construction and maintenance of this project. [15A NCAC 02H .0507 (c) and 15A NCAC
02H .0506 (b)(2) and (c)(2)]
RECEIVED
OCT 3 1 2019
MP SECTM MM

DocuSlgn Envelope ID: FD078E94-4942-4263-A2B5-6OA8B5BEB6DB
9. Continuing Compliance:
The applicant/permittee and their authorized agents shall conduct all activities in a manner
consistent with State water quality standards (including any requirements resulting from
compliance with 303(d) of the Clean Water Act), and any other appropriate requirements of State
and Federal law. If the Division determines that such standards or laws are not being met,
including failure to sustain a designated or achieved use, or that State or Federal law is being
violated, or that further conditions are necessary to assure compliance, than the Division may
reevaluate and modify this General Water Quality Certification. [15A NCAC 02H .0507(d)]
10. All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters or wetlands will be regularly
inspected and maintained to prevent contamination of waters and wetlands from fuels, lubricants,
hydraulic fluids or other potential toxic chemicals. In the event of a hydrocarbon or chemical spill,
the permittee/contractor shall immediately contact the Division of Water Quality, between the
hours of 8 am to 5 pm at the Wilmington Regional Office at 910.796.7215 and after hours and on
weekends call [phone]. Management of such spills shall comply with provisions of the
North Carolina Oil Pollution and Hazardous Substances Control Act. [15A NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(3)
and (c)(3),15A NCAC 02B .0200 (3)(0, and GS 143 Article 21A].
11. Fueling, lubrication and general equipment maintenance should not take place within 50
feet of a waterbody or wetlands to prevent contamination by fuel and oils. [15A NCAC 02H .0506
(b)(3) and (c)(3) and 15A NCAC 02B .0200 (3)(0].
12. This certification grants permission to the director, an authorized representative of the
Director, or DEQ staff, upon the presentation of proper credentials, to enter the property during
normal business hours 15A NCAC 02H.0502(e).
13. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable
Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant and/or authorized agent is required
to return a completed certificate of completion form to the NCDEQ DWR 401 and Buffers Unit North
Carolina Division of Water Resources, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699 within ten days
of project completion. The certification of completion is available at:
http: / /portal.ncdenr org/web/wq/swl2/ws/401 /certsandl2ermits/ap2ply/formsl.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and
may result in criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed
impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this
Certification shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval and its conditions are final and binding unless contested.
This Certification can be contested as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of General Statute 150B by filing
a written petition for an administrative hearing to the Office of Administrative Hearings (hereby
known as OAH), A petition form maybe obtained from the OAH athttp://www.ncoah.com/ or by
calling the OAH Clerk's Office at [phone] for information.
Within sixty (60) calendar days of receipt of this notice, a petition must be filed with the OAH. A
petition is considered filed when the original and one (1) copy along with any applicable OAH filing
RECEIVE®
OCT 3 1 2019

DocuSlgn Envelope ID: FD07BE94-4942-0263-A2B5-60ABB5BEB6DB
fee is received in the OAH during normal office hours (Monday through Friday between 8:00 am
and 5:00 pm, excluding official state holidays).
The petition maybe faxed to the OAH at [phone], provided the original and one copy of the
petition along with any applicable OAH filing fee is received by the OAH within five (5) business
days following the faxed transmission.
Mailing address for the OAH:
Ifsending via US Postal Service:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
If sending via delivery service (UPS,
FedEx, etc):
Office of Administrative Hearings
1711 New Hope Church Road
Raleigh, NC 27609-6285
One (1) copy of the petition must also be served to DEQ:
Bill Lane, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
This letter completes the review of the Division'of Water Resources under Section 401 of the Clean
Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Robb Mairs in the DWR Wilmington
Regional Office at 910.796.7215 or Robb.Mairs(@ncdenr.gov.
Sincerely,
Cy
Docu519oeE b:
sue, �"
E3ABA74AC7DD434...
Morelia Sanchez King, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Wilmington Regional Office
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
Enclosures: GC 4175
Liz Hair - USACE Wilmington Regulatory Field Office -Electronic Copy
Samuel Bell- Stroud Engineering, P.A.- Electronic Copy
Gregg Bodnar- NCDCM Morehead City Office -Electronic Copy
DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch file-LF
WiRO
0 CT 3 1 2019
Fop SECTION M14D

DCM Coordinator: Sot AP Permit #: `c3' 6 /Q
MAILING DISTRIBUTION SHEET
DCM Field Offices
C
Elizabeth City (with revised work plan drawings)
Morehead Cityi I 0'
Washington
Wilmington
US ACOE Offices:
Washington: Raleigh Bland (Beaufort, Camden, Chowan, Craven, Hertford, Hyde, Perquimans,
Tyrrell)
Josh Pelletier (Bertie, Currituck, Dare, Gates, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Washington)
Tom Steffans (NC DOT- Beaufort, Carteret, Craven, Pamlico)
Bill Biddlecome (NC DOT -Remainder ECity/Washington District)
Wilmington: Tyler Crumbley (Brunswick, New Hanover)
fir Mikeret, Onslow, Pender) I
rad Shaver (NCDOT-Brunswick, New Hanover, Onslow, Pender)
Cultural Resources:
Public Water Supply:
Marine Fisheries:
NC DOT:
Shellfish Sanitation:
State Property:
DEMLR/DWR:
Renee Gledhill -Earley at Environmental.Review@ncdcr,ggk,
Heidi Cox (WIRO)
Shane Staples
David Harris
Shannon Jenkins / Sharon Gupton
Tim Walton / Mike Moser
Sheri Montalvo / Shelton Sullivan
Clif Whitfield (WARO)
Washington: Anthony Scarbraugh-401
Roger Thorpe-Stormwater
Garcy Ward- (NCDOT-Beaufort, Bertie, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Craven, Currituck,
Dare, Gates, Hertford, Hyde, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Perquimans, Tyrrell, Washington)
Wilmington: Robb Mairs — 401 (Carteret, Onslow, Pender)
Chad Coburn — 401 (Brunswick, New Hanover)
Christine Hall - Stormwater l
Joanne Steenhuis - 401 (NCDOT-Brunswick, New Hanover, Onslow, Pender)
Wildlife Resources:
Natural Heritage Program
Maria Dunn (WAROA'
Rodney Butler
LPO: ( W ftycw.'A
Fax Distribution: Permittee #: Agent#_
(NCDOT) Travis Wilson

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
BRAXTON C. DAVIS
Director
Stroud Engineering, P.A.
Mr. Sam Bell (via email)
Dear Mr. Bell:
NORTH CAROLINA
EnWonmtnml Quality
October 4, 2019
This correspondence acknowledges your October 4, 2019 email in which you indicated that your
client, Mr. Michael Richter, wishes to resume processing of his CAMA Major Permit
application. Based on this request, processing of your application has resumed as of this day
October 4, 2019. The revised projected 75-day deadline for making a decision is November 2,
2019.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me at (252) 808-
2808 ext. 215, or by e-mail at gregg.bodnarng,ncdem.gov.
CC: Mr. Michael Richter (via email)
Sincerely,
Gregg Bo nar
Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
D_EQ�
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Coastal Management
Morehead City Office 1 400 Commerce Avenue I Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
252.808.2808

W&
ROY COOPER NORTH CAROLINA
Governor Environmental Quality
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
BRAXTON C. DAVIS �.
Director
August 5, 2019
Stroud Engineering, P.A.
Sam Bell
3302-C Bridges Street
Morehead City, NC 28557
Dear Mr. Bell:
This correspondence acknowledges your August 5, 2019 email in which you indicated that your
client, Michael Richter, wishes to place his CAMA Major Permit application in abeyance until
while the applicant reviews concerns brought up by review agencies. Based on this request,
processing of your application will be placed on hold until such time as a written request is
received in this office requesting a resumption of application processing. As required by NCAC
T15A:07J.0204(d), the permit processing period will not run. Upon my receipt of a written
request to reinitiate processing, the Division of Coastal Management will resume processing of
the application at the point where it was terminated.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me at (252) 808-
2808 ext. 215, or by e-mail at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Gregg Bo nar
Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Coastal Management
Morehead City Office 1 400 Commerce Avenue I Morehead City. North Carolina 28557
252.8082808

r . ,
Bodnar, Gregg
From:
Sam Bell <[e-mail]>
Sent:
Monday, August 05, 2019 1:33 PM
To:
Bodnar, Gregg
Cc:
Mike richter
Subject:
[External] Richter CAMA Major
Hello Mr. Bodnar,
Thanks again for the call today. As discussed, we would like to request the Richter Property CAMA Major permit
application be placed on applicant hold so that we may have an opportunity to address any outstanding issues with the
proposed project and application. Please let me know if you have any questions or need any additional info,
Thanks,
Sam Bell, P.E.
Project Engineer
3302-C Bridges Street
Morehead City, NC 28557
252-247-7479 x224
Click here to upload files.

r ^
Bodnar
tb(d jos o%e.
w C Q(�, °^ a"'n�
aqice- #Ia/r9 6���.
From: Sam Bell <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2019 10:44 AM
To: Bodnar, Gregg; Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US); Mairs, Robb L; Staples, Shane
Cc: Davenport, Ryan; Mike richter
Subject: [External] RE: Michael Richter
Categories: Important
Good Morning,
Mr. Richter's response below goes into more detail on the "need and purpose" and "avoidance and minimization"
aspects of the permit application:
"Sam,
Here are my thoughts on 1) the "Bridge" 2) " need and purpose" 3) "avoidance ano minimization .
1) Bridge: The structure labeled on the plan as a bridge is actually only a footpath constructed of
nominal 2" lumber bearing directly on the ground. The grades on either side of the "bridge" are
incompatible with footpath traffic for the elderly- which I'm getting to be , and for those who can't climb
grades.
2) Needs and Purpose: The needs and purpose is to provide for access to the water, and to the
property adjacent to the water for both pedestrian and vehicular traffic. The current wetlands bisects
two sections of the property and prevents vehicular traffic, including trailered sailboat, jet ski or other
watercraft to the water. The slopes to and from the wetlands limits water access by the elderly and for
those who can't climb grades. Because of the difficult access, boat docks and other water dependent
accessory structures normally associated with the area are impracticable.
3) Avoidance and Minimization: From what research I can do this is highly subjective and subject to
negotiation. Part of the "negotiation" is to let the corp official know what has already been done to
avoid and minimize impact. We have significantly reduced the area of fill by (50)%, avoided CAMA
wetlands, and maintained the natural area landward of the high tide line. An alternate to the fill would
be retaining/sea walls, fill, and a vehicular bridge which is cost prohibitive.
I am in the area the rest of today and tomorrow, and will be glad to meet with you and/or the local
official to discuss.
Mike Richter"
I can confirm that we did reduce the total fill area by roughly 50%from the initial design. This was to avoid impact to the
coastal wetland area and keep the flow path on the west property line intact. An underdrain culvert was also added to
the design to retain the flow path from the wetland area on the adjacent property. Thank you again for taking the time
to review the project. Please let me know if you have any additional comments/concerns.
Best regards,
Sam Bell, P.E.

Project Engineer
3302-C Bridges Street
Morehead City, NC 28557
252-247-7479 x224
Click here to upload files.
From: Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, August 5, 2019 4:36 PM
To: Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US) <[e-mail]>; Mairs, Robb L <[e-mail]>;
Staples, Shane <[e-mail]>
Cc: Sam Bell <[e-mail]>; Davenport, Ryan <[e-mail]>
Subject: Michael Richter
Afternoon all,
After discussions with Mr. Richter's agent, Sam Bell, the applicant has requested to place the project on applicant hold
to discuss the concerns of the review agencies. To summarize USACE and DWR have concerns over the purpose and
need of the proposed 404 fill and further concerns over avoidance and minimization. DMF has also noted concern over
avoidance and minimization.
Mr. Bell has been CC'd on this request. Mr. Bell, if you have any additional questions concerning the agency comments
please let us know and I will be happy to coordinate.
Thanks,
Gregg
Gregg Bodnar
D W Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
�} Division of Coastal Management
Department of Environmental Quality
LCA .00
252 808 2908 ext 215 (Office)
,,, ���•••/// [e-mail]
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Pubic Records Law and maybe disclosed to third parties.

Bodnar, Gregg
From: Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2019 12:57 PM
To: Bodnar, Gregg; Mairs, Robb L; Staples, Shane; Dunn, Maria T.
Subject: RE: [External] RE: Michael Richter
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Gregg,
I'm looking at it today... regarding the cost prohibitive response for a bridge, the applicant will need to provide details
regarding the cost of the fill, culvert, and bulkhead compared to that of a bridge which would support a trailer with a
small boat/Jetski/kayak as described in Sam's most recent response.
The applicant will also need to provide a cross-section showing the culvert. A 10" PVC pipe is likely not sturdy enough to
withstand compaction over years of driving across with a truck and trailer. The pipe will need to be upsized in diameter
and of a sturdy material, or install multiple sturdy pipes in order to maintain flow from the adjacent wetland.
Additionally, a 15-foot wide crossing is excessive when most driveways are no larger than 10-12 feet. The applicant will
need to reduce the width of the crossing -this goes to the avoidance and minimization point.
Thanks,
Liz
-----Original Message -----
From: Bodnar, Gregg [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2019 8:21 AM
To: Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US) <[e-mail]>; Mairs, Robb L <[e-mail]>;
Staples, Shane <[e-mail]>; Dunn, Maria T. <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] FW: [External] RE: Michael Richter
Hey all,
I wanted to touch base with everyone and see if anyone has any thoughts to the response below. I am planning on
getting more information on point 2 and will provide asap.
Thanks,
Gregg

Bodnar, Gregg
From: Sam Bell <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2019 11:43 AM
To: Bodnar, Gregg; Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US); Mairs, Robb L; Staples, Shane
Cc: Davenport, Ryan; Mike richter
Subject: RE: [External] RE: Michael Richter
Hello All,
Quick correction to the previous email regarding Mr. Richter's future plans. There is no current plan for a dock, but
possibly sometime in the future. Still no current or future plans for a boat ramp. /
Thanks, AcrO 1p kzcaA rose -6 vt�
Sam Bell, P.E. I ' �� /w_
C/ Utra��Yr Lre N Gsr+�r y� �Qr.+c
Project Engineer
3302-C Bridges Street ��� �^0��•�/�"`' L S�
Morehead City, NC 28557
252-247-77479 x 24 ��,'i;/ K roDosr� (N•5 Trl"e . v
Click here to upload files. 1
From: Sam Bell
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2019 11:19 AM
To:'Bodnar, Gregg' <[e-mail]>; Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US) <[e-mail]>;
Mairs, Robb L <[e-mail]>; Staples, Shane <[e-mail]>
Cc: Davenport, Ryan <[e-mail]>; Mike richter <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: Michael Richter
Good Morning,
Thanks for getting in touch. I talked with Mr. Richter again and he said there are no current plans for a future dock or
boat ramp. The access would be to use the property for small beach -launched watercraft such as kayaks, inflatable rafts,
and small sailboats. The access would not be intended for motor boats or larger craft.
Please let me know if this answers your questions or if you need any further details.
Thanks again,
Sam Bell, P.E.
Project Engineer
3302-C Bridges Street
Morehead City, NC 28557
252-247-7479 x224

Click here to upload files.
From: Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2019 8:53 AM
To: Sam Bell <[e-mail]>; Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US) <[e-mail]>; Mairs,
Robb L <[e-mail]>; Staples, Shane <[e-mail]>
Cc: Davenport, Ryan <ryan.davenport ncdenr.gov>; Mike richter <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: Michael Richter
Morning Sam,
I wanted to touch base with you today and ask an additional question. I have reached out to the agencies to touch base
with them today and I wanted to ask an additional question concerning point #2. Currently there is not a docking facility
on the property and the current application does not have one proposed. Point #2 discusses an access need for
watercraft. There is SAV in the immediate area and I wanted to ask about the intended use of the property for
watercraft usage.
Thanks for the additional information,
Gregg
DE/
� tma�xeUf Rpx7 V
Gregg Bodnar
Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
Department of Environmental Quality
252 808 ZOOS ext 215 (Office)
Gree e.B odna r@ n cde nr. eov
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and maybe disclosed to third parties.
From: Sam Bell <sbeliCcDstroudengineer.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2019 10:44 AM
To: Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail]>; Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US) <[e-mail]>;
Mairs, Robb L <[e-mail]>; Staples, Shane <[e-mail]>
Cc: Davenport, Ryan <[e-mail]>; Mike richter <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] RE: Michael Richter
Good Morning,

Mr. Richter's response below goes into more detail on the "need and purpose" and "avoidance and minimization"
aspects of the permit application:
"Sam,
Here are my thoughts on 1) the "Bridge" 2) " need and purpose" 3) "avoidance and minimization".
1) Bridge: The structure labeled on the plan as a bridge is actually only a footpath constructed of
nominal 2" lumber bearing directly on the ground. The grades on either side of the "bridge" are
incompatible with footpath traffic for the elderly- which I'm getting to be , and for those who can't climb
grades.
2) Needs and Purpose: The needs and purpose is to provide for access to the water, and to the
property adjacent to the water for both pedestrian and vehicular traffic: The current wetlands bisects
two sections of the property and prevents vehicular traffic, including trailered sailboat, jet ski or other
watercraft to the water. The slopes to and from the wetlands limits water access by the elderly and for
those who can't climb grades. Because of the difficult access, boat docks and other water dependent
accessory structures normally associated with the area are impracticable.
3) Avoidance and Minimization: From what research I can do this is highly subjective and subject to
negotiation. Part of the "negotiation" is to let the corp official know what has already been done to
avoid and minimize impact. We have significantly reduced the area of fill by (50)%, avoided CAMA
wetlands, and maintained the natural area landward of the high tide line. An alternate to the fill would
be retaining/sea walls, fill, and a vehicular bridge which is cost prohibitive.
I am in the area the rest of today and tomorrow, and will be glad to meet with you and/or the local
official to discuss.
Mike Richter"
I can confirm that we did reduce the total fill area by roughly 50%from the initial design. This was to avoid impact to the
coastal wetland area and keep the flow path on the west property line intact. An underdrain culvert was also added to
the design to retain the flow path from the wetland area on the adjacent property. Thank you again for taking the time
to review the project. Please let me know if you have any additional comments/concerns.
Best regards,
Sam Bell, P.E.
Project Engineer
3302-C Bridges Street
Morehead City, NC 28557
252-247-7479 x224
Click here to upload files.
From: Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail]_>
Sent: Monday, August 5, 2019 4:36 PM
To: Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US) <[e-mail]>; Mairs, Robb L <[e-mail]>;
Staples, Shane <[e-mail]>
Cc: Sam Bell <[e-mail]>; Davenport, Ryan <[e-mail]>
Subject: Michael Richter

Afternoon all,
After discussions with Mr. Richter's agent, Sam Bell, the applicant has requested to place the project on applicant hold
to discuss the concerns of the review agencies. To summarize USACE and DWR have concerns over the purpose and
need of the proposed 404 fill and further concerns over avoidance and minimization. DMF has also noted concern over
avoidance and minimization.
Mr. Bell has been CC'd on this request. Mr. Bell, if you have any additional questions concerning the agency comments
please let us know and I will be happy to coordinate.
Thanks,
Gregg
Q EQ�
ehsarv�n'�k'iCSaygenne^a�m
Gregg Bodnar
Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
Department of Environmental Quality
252 808 2808 ext 215 (Office)
G ree e.B odna rCwn cd enr.eov
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Bodnar, Gregg
From: Sam Bell <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2019 3:14 PM
To: Bodnar, Gregg
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: [External] RE: DMF comments for Mr. Richter
Attachments: bridge -cost estimate.pdfi PM3007-001 2D_rev2-AUG29.pdf
Categories: Important
Afternoon Gregg,
Please see attached cost estimate and site plan -Rev 2 that address the comments and concerns that arose form the
initial application. To summarize the plan updates; the pipe was upsized to a traffic rated 12" corrugated pvc pipe and
the wetland fill area was reduced by roughly 25%. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Sam Bell, P.E.
Project Engineer
3302-C Bridges Street
Morehead City, NC 28557
252-247-7479 x224
Click here to upload files.
From: Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 1:04 PM
To: Sam Bell <[e-mail]>
Subject: DMF comments for Mr. Richter
Afternoon Sam,
In line with the others, but wanted to pass along.
Thanks,
Gregg

Z��D,EQ�
Ormvuxw d rare s�m�`m o.��
Gregg Bodnar
Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
Department of Environmental Quality
252 808 2808 ext 215 (Office)
G reee.Bodna r@ncdenceov
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Low and may be disclosed to third parties.

Cost Estimate
Project: PM3007-001
Richter Property
Bridge Crossing v. Culvert w/ Fill
Option 1: Bridge Crossing
item
cost
Bridge
$
35,000
Seeding
$
125
Erosion Control
$
125
Fill
$
500
Bulkhead
$
800
Misc
$
200
Total
$
36,750
Option 2: Culvert w/ Fill
item
cost
Fill
$
1,200
Drainage Pipe
$
700
Bulkhead
$
1,200
Seeding
$
200
Erosion Control
$
200
Misc
1
1 $
1 200
Total
1 $
1 3,700
Sep. 3, 2019

COASTAL WETLANDS
RETAIN E%IST ING
O,F.,j �••l �. - 2.0 _ UPLAND FILL 959 SF
DRAINAGE OUTFALL .004 VETLAND FILL : Q] SF
VICINITY MAP ?oi hti A j; _ INSTALL 94
LF
T
' `.' ; :. r er '18\ � ••. Nip
POD:/' • O ;y r•`rr j'''; '' ._
U4VE 'I35JUVCK
•• �� •E__J �� o p3
2.0 - 3p,e .160q
e`
POT
C
aPP+'oQ�P
a
CROSS SECTION
SCALE: 1V:SH
SHEET -1 OF I
PROJECT -: 3007-001
DESIGN FILE -: PN3009-001 2D_revl.dgn
HIGHFLL GROUNDS
:,
et"'ING CON'.
�r
REMOVE BRIDGE
13 r •W. ••
NONF ORJPE
Z
r'r
INSyTALL 26 LF
2 PVC DRAINAGE
r 4�. O
\
O
PIPE
\
N
\
S
N
WETLAND
FILL
•
\. •9/ 3�i '
fp
FILL GROUND
�j
•
FOUNDATION ELEVATION
NF
RF
pIN 32249g k
Do N
,-L •D
< N
W D-
I- g4.95r
= z5 13.00 35 E
1ETLANDS PRELIMINARY
MICHAEL P. RICHTER
126 S. FERRY DOCK ROAD - HARKENS ISLAND, NO
N 0 T FOR CONSTRUCTION
BB 1404 P 260 n HS JI P 38T PIN 133514323566
CLIENT: MICHAEL P. RICHTER
ADDRESS: 211 STRATPCRC ROAD
GOLOSBORO. NC 27534
DESIGNED:
SJB
DRAWN:
SJB
PHONE: [phone]
CHECKED:
20 p 20 40
n/�
(l\STROUD ENOINEERING.PA
APPROVED:
SCALE 1" - 20'
VMORBffBR�Cm NOS
jbt)NraAry ucExa xa caa
DATE:
05r10n9
UNREEL P£
1' a $D'

Bodnar, Gre
From: Bodnar, Gregg
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2019 11:40 AM
To: Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US); Weychert, Curtis R; Dunn, Maria T.; Mairs, Robb L
Cc: Davenport, Ryan
Subject: FW: [External] RE: DMF comments for Mr. Richter
Attachments: bridge -cost estimate.pdfi PM3007-001 2D rev2-AUG29.pdf
Morning all,
Sam bell from Stroud has supplied the above revisions and justification for the Michael Richter application. In summary
he has provided a cost estimate for a bridge versus fill and has a revised workplan where the fill has been reduced from
the original 609ft2 to 423ft2.
Please provide any feedback and I will pass along.
Thanks as always,
Gregg
Gregg Bodnar
Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
e D E Department of Environmental Quality .
252 809 2808 ext 215 (office)
— [e-mail]
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Cow and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Sam Bell <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, September09, 2019 3:14 PM
To: Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: [External] RE: DMF comments for Mr. Richter
Afternoon Gregg,
Please see attached cost estimate and site plan -Rev 2 that address the comments and concerns that arose form the
initial application. To summarize the plan updates; the pipe was upsized to a traffic rated 12" corrugated pvc pipe and
the wetland fill area was reduced by roughly 25%. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Sam Bell, P.E.
Project Engineer
3302-C Bridges Street
Morehead City, NC 28557
252-247-7479 x224
Click here to upload files.
From: Bodnar, Gregg <gregg.bodnarPncdenr.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 1:04 PM
To: Sam Bell <sbell0stroudengineer.com>
Subject: DMF comments for Mr. Richter
Afternoon Sam,
In line with the others, but wanted to pass along.
Thanks,
Gregg
DKQ
+an vi[sta� �vc�xpw�q�
Gregg Bodnar
Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
Department of Environmental Quality
252 808 2808 ext 215 (Office)
[e-mail]
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Low and may be disclosed to third parties.

1CM MF-1
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
(last revised 12127106)
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1. Primary Applicant(Landowner Information
Business Name
N/A
Project Name (if applicable)
126 S Ferry Dock Road
Applicant 1: First Name
Michael
MI
P
Last Name
Richter
Applicant 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
If additional applicants, please attach an additional page(s) with names listed.
Mailing Address
211 Stratford Road
PO Box
City
Goldsboro
te
7NtC
ZIP
27534
Country
us
Phone No.
919 - 580 - 8469 ext.
FAX No.
Street Address (d different from above)
city
State
ZIP
Email
[e-mail]
2. Agent/Contractor Information
Business Name
Stroud Engineering, P.A.
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name
Samuel
MI
J
Last Name
Bell
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Mailing Address
3302-C Bridges Street
PO Box
City
Morehead City
State
NC
ZIP
28557
Phone No. t
252 - 247 - 7479 ext. 224
Phone No. 2
ext.
FAX No.
Contractor #
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
[e-mail]
<Form continues on back>
RECEIVED
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOA5T :: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
DCM-MHD CITY

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 2 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
3. Project Location
County (can be multiple)
Street Address
State Rd. #
Carteret
126 S Ferry Dock Road
Subdivision Name
City
State
Zip
n/a
Harkers Island
NC
28516 -
Phone No.
Lot No.(s) (d many, attach additional page with list)
- - ext.
I I ,
a. In which NC river basin is the project located?
b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
n/a
Back Sound
c. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade?
d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
ISINatural ❑Manmade ❑Unknown
Atlantic Ocean
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
f. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
❑Yes ®No
work falls within.
n/a
4. Site Description
a.
Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.)
b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.)
70
18099
c.
Size of individual lot(s)
d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
18099, 1 1
NWL (normal wafer level)
(If many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list)
1-8' ®NHW or ❑NWL
e.
Vegetation on tract
Native wetland grasses near shoreline and drainage path.
Grassed lawn on majority of lot.
f.
Man-made features and uses now on tract
residential, currently has home and parking pad on lot.
g.
Identify and describe the existing land uses adiacent to the proposed project site.
residential lots on both sides
h.
How does local government zone the tract?
1. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
residential
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
®Yes []No ❑NA
j.
Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? ❑Yes ®No
k.
Hasa professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. ❑Yes ®No ®NA
If yes, by whom?
I.
Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a ❑Yes ®No DNA
National Register listed or eligible property?
<Form continues on next page> RECEIVED
JUN 06 2019
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www. nccoasta l managementjblOM_MF{D CITY

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 3 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
m. (i) Are there wetlands on the site? ®Yes ❑No
(ii) Are there coastal wetlands on the site? ®Yes ❑No
(iii) If yes to either (1) or (ii) above, has a delineation been conducted? EYes ❑No
(Attach documentation, if available)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
On -site septic system
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
Harkers Island Town Water System
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems.
stormwater sheet flows toward the wetland area from the lawn
5. Activities and Impacts
a.
Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use? ❑Commercial ❑Public/Government
EPrivate/Community
b.
Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
Purpose of project is to provide access to the shore by filling in a portion of the low spot on the lot. The fill area is roughly
2196 sq-ft and impacts 613 sq-ft of 404 Wetland area.
c.
Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
1. Clear site and path for equipment. 2. Remove existing wooden foot bridge. 3. Construct bulkhead extension. 4. Bring in
dump truck and small earth -mover for fill operations. 5. Seed and sod for permanent stabilization. 6. Re -seed as needed for
vegetation to establish.
d.
List all development activities you propose.
The development will include rough 2196 sq-ft of fill area down a sloped embankment into a low spot to bridge a gap to the
shoreline. An existing block bulkhead will be extended to support the weight of the fill along the eastern property line. A
drainage pipe will be added to maintain a drainage path for the wetland on the adjacent property.
e.
Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? new work
f.
What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project? 2196 ESq.Ft or []Acres
g.
Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area ❑Yes ENO ❑NA
that the public has established use of?
h.
Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
Vegetated sheet flow to wetland area and out to Back Sound.
i.
Will wastewater or stomiwater be discharged into a wetland? [Dyes []No ❑NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water? ❑Yes ENO ❑NA
j.
Is there any mitigation proposed? ❑Yes ENO ❑NA
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal.
<Form continues on back>
RECEIVED
JUN 06 2019
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastalmanageme gJ(,MLMHD CITY

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 4 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
6. Additional Information
In addition to this completed application form, (MP-1) the following items below, 9 applicable, must ba submitted in order for the application
package to be complete. Items (a) — (19 are always applicable to any major development application. please consult the application
instruction booklet on how to property prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
I. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name David Quick Phone No.
Address 960 Island Rd
Name Charles Staley Phone No.
Address 130 S Ferry Dock Rd
Name Phone No.
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, it applicable.
i. Wetland delineation, if necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10), if necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
7,
ssion to Enter on Land
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that 1 am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Date 5/10119 Prin me i ha P. Ri0oter
Signature t
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your Iroposed project.
®DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information ❑DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
❑DCM MP-3 Upland Development
[]DCM MP-4 Structures Information RECEIVED
JUN 06 2019
DCM-MHD CITY

RECEIVED
Form DCM MP-2
EXCAVATION and FILL
(Except for bridges and culverts)
JUN 2 0 NIS
DCM-MHD CITY
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation and/or fill activities. All values should be given in feet.
Access
Other
Channel
Canal
Boat Basin
Boat Ramp
Rock Groin
Rock
(excluding
(NLW or
Breakwater
shoreline
NWL)
stabilization
Length
52
Width
18
Avg. Existing
NA
NA
n/a
Depth
Final Project
NA
NA
n/a
Depth
1. EXCAVATION ®This section not applicable
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or NWL in b. Type of material to be excavated.
cubic yards.
c. (i) Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlands/marsh
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL []None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
d. High -ground excavation in cubic yards.
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL ®This section not applicable
a. Location of disposal area.
c. (i) Do you claim title to disposal area?
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA
(ii) If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.
area.
d. (i) Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance?
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, where?
e. (i) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh f.
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL []None
(ii) Describe the purpose of disposal in these areas:
(i) Does the disposal include any area in the water?
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, how much water area is affected?
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastalmanaaement.net revised: 12/26/06

Form DCM MP-2 (Excavation and Fill, Page 2 of 2)
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION ®This section,not applicable
(if development is a wood groin, use MP-4 — Structures)
a. Type of shoreline stabilization: b. Length:
❑Bulkhead ❑Riprap ❑Breakwater/Sill ❑Other:_ Width:
c. Average distance waterward of NHW or NWL: d. Maximum distance waterward of NHW or NWL:
e. Type of stabilization material:
g. Number of square feet of fill to be placed below water level.
Bulkhead backfill Riprap
Breakwater/Sill Other
I. Source of fill material.
f. (i) Has there been shoreline erosion during preceding 12
months?
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA
(it) If yes, state amount of erosion and source of erosion amount
information.
h. Type of fill material.
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES ❑This section not applicable
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. (i) Will fill material be brought to the site? ®Yes El No ❑NA b. (i) Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands/marsh (CW),
If yes,
(ii) Amount of material to be placed in the water 0
(iii) Dimensions of fill area 609 sc-ft
(iv) Purpose of fill
Access to shoreline
submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or
other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW _ ❑SAV _ ❑SB
OWL 609 ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the fill in these areas:
Access to shoreline
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion b. What type of construction equipment will be used (e.g., dragline,
controlled? backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
No stockpiling necessary, all fill material will be placed on site and dump truck, small earth mover
permanantly stabilized within 7-14 days
C. (i) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the project?
❑Yes ❑No ®NA
(ii) If yes, explain what type and how they will be implemented.
Property
Name
d. (i) Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project
site? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
Name
Signature
A6
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.necoastaimananement.net revised: 12/26/06

Form UCM MP-5
BRIDGES and CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
1. BRIDGES his section not applicable
a. Is the proposed bridge: b. Water body to be crossed by bridge:
❑Commercial ❑Public/Govemmenl ❑Private/Community
c. Type of bridge (construction material):
e. (i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? []Yes []No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge:
(iii) Width of existing bridge:
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain)
9. Length of proposed bridge:
L Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow? ❑Yes ❑No
If yes, explain:
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge: _
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at NLW or NWL:
(1) Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert? [_]Yes [_]No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert:
(iii) Width of existing culvert:
(iv) Height of the lop of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL: _
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
h. Width of proposed bridge:
j. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by reducing or
increasing the existing navigable opening? ❑Yes [)No
If yes, explain:
I. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard concerning their
approval? ❑Yes []No
If yes, explain:
m. Will the proposed badge cross wetlands containing no navigable n. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands: _
waters? ❑Yes ❑No
If yes, explain:
2. CULVERTS El This section not applicable
a. Number of culverts proposed: t b. Water body in which the culvert is to be placed:
4e4 Veri.nNpJ- RECEIVED
JUN 2 0 2019
DCM-MHD
CITY
252-808-2808 ::
1-888-4RCOAST ::
www.nccoastaimanagement.net
revised:
10/26106�

Form ®CM MP-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 2 of 4)
< Form continues on back>
c. Type of culvert (construction material):
Pvc rtrE
d. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge? R—//
L�'es ❑No
If yes,
(it) Length of existing bridge:
(iii) Width of existing bridge: 4
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge: P/4
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain) YES br,412
to be removed
f. Length of proposed culvert: ZB
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the NHW or NWL.
A—
j. Will the proposed culvert affect navigation by reducing or ��,,//
increasing the existing navigable opening? ❑Yes EA
If yes, explain:
e. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert? []Yes LdNo
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert(s): _
(!it) Width of existing culvert(s): _
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
9. Width of proposed culvert:
Ir
i. Depth of culvert to be buried below existing bottom contour.
(SI
k. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow? ❑IN�//
Yes LyNo
If yes, explain:
3. EXCAVATION and FILL Lhis section not applicable
a. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation below the NHW or NWL? ❑Yes []No
If yes,
Ili) Avg. length of area to be excavated:
(III) Avg. width of area to be excavated:
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated:
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards:
C. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
high -ground excavation? ❑Yes []No
If yes,
III) Avg. length of area to be excavated:
(III) Avg, width of area to be excavated:
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated:
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards:
b. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL []None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
252.808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastalmanagement.net revised: 10/26/06

Form DCM MP-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 3 of 4)
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any excavation, please complete the following:
(i) Location of the spoil disposal area:
(ii) Dimensions of the spoil disposal area:
(iii) Do you claim title to the disposal area? ❑Yes ❑No (If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.)
(iv) Will the disposal area be available for future maintenance? []Yes ❑No
(v) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAVs), other wetlands (WL), or shell
bottom (SB)?
❑CW ❑SAV OWL ❑SB ❑None
If any boxes are checked, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
(vi) Does the disposal area include any area below the NHW or NWL? ? ❑Yes ❑No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
e. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed below NHW or NWL? ❑Yes [-]No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled:
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled:
(iv) Purpose of fill:
f. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed within coastal wetlandstmarsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB _
❑WL []None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
g. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed on high -ground? ❑Yes []No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled:
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled:
(iv) Purpose of fill:
a. Will the proposed project require the relocation of any existing b. Will the proposed project require the construction of any temp?
utility lines? []Yes [9Io detour structures? ❑Yes No
If yes, explain: If yes, explain:
If this portion of the proposed project has already received
approval from local authorities, please attach a copy of the
approval or certification. RECEIVED
< Form continues on back> JUN 2 0 2019
DCM-MHD CITY
252-808.2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: w .nccoastalmanaaement.net revised: 10126106

Form DCM MP-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 4 of 4)
c. Will the proposed project require any work channels? � d. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion
❑Yes � No controlled?
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2. 51 LT -PettC! arWnd 6MV M
@dce 1f, k-At ere0.
e. What type of construction equipment will be used (for example,
dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
Fv'ni —eX
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
shoreline stabilization? ❑Yes No
If yes, complete form MP-2, Section 3 for Shoreline
Stabilization only.
6 /l2/ 19
RICHTE12 . PROP6R7y
Project Name
(htC"AEL RICHT-Ek
Applicant Name
o nA
Applicant Signature " Rtb
A6M'r
f. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project site?
[]Yes [( M
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastalmanaaement.net revised: 10/26/06

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: Michael Richter
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: 126 S. Ferry Dock Rd., Harkers Island
Latitude:34°41'37.87"N Longitude:76°33'38.01"W
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA, D&F
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit — 1/28/19
Was Applicant Present — No
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received — 6/6/19
Application Complete- 6/20/19
Office — Morehead City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A)
Local Land Use Plan — Carteret County
Land Classification from LUP — Limited Transition
(B)
AEC(s) Involved: ES
(C)
Water Dependent: (no)
(D)
Intended Use: Private
(E)
Wastewater Treatment: Existing — Community
Planned — NA
(F)
Type of Structures: Existing — Single Family Residence
Planned — Culvert, Bulkhead
(G)
Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source — N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION:
DREDGED FILLED OTHER
(A) High Ground
N/A
2,000ft2
Disturbed
N/A
(B)ACOE 404
N/A
609ft2
N/A
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 2,609ftz
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: SA-ORW
(G) Shellfish Classification: Open
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing to fill G��..Z wetlands
in order to better access the shoreline. —
JUL 2 3 2019
MP SECTION MHD

Field Investigation Report:
Michael Richter
Page 02
9. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION: The Michael Richter project is located at 126 S. Ferry
Dock Rd. on Harkers Island adjacent Back Sound. This property is 18,099ft2in its entirety
and has an existing single family home. The shoreline is 70' in length and consists of a
white sand estuarine beach. Situated between the house and beach is a depression area that
contains Coastal and ACOE jurisdictional wetlands as marked by Tom Charles. An
existing 6' wide bridge crosses this depression providing access to the shoreline. All
existing high ground development was permitted by Carteret County Local Permitting.
Water depths offshore of the beach are —2' at NLW. Patches of SAV exist in this area.
The Division of Water Resources classifies this area of Back Sound as SA-ORW waters.
This is not a Primary Nursery Area. This portion of Back Sound is open to harvesting
shellfish. The parcel is classified in the Carteret Co. LUP as Limited Transition.
10. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Michael Richter is proposing to create an earthen access to
the shoreline by placing 609ftz(15'X40') of fill material in ACOE jurisdictional
wetlands. The fill would be —2' deep. A silt fence would be placed along the North
boundary of the fill area until area is stabilized. A 103' bulkhead would be placed along the
south boundary of the fill area to prevent fill material from being deposited on neighboring
property. A 1'X28' culvert would be placed beneath fill area to provide drainage. On high
ground, 2,000ftz would be graded for landscaping.
11. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS: This project would result in the filling of 609ft2 of ACOE
jurisdictional wetlands. The finished grade in the fill area would be at the same level or
higher than adjacent natural grade. This could alter the local drainage patterns and could
result in water level changes. Earthen fill and sediment deposition from this fill project
could impact adjacent coastal wetlands without proper sedimentation barriers. There could
be impacts to the adjacent coastal wetland substrate during the mechanized filling and
grading process.
Name: Ryan Davenport Date: 7/16/19 Morehead City
KECEIVED
JUL 2 3 2019
MP SECTION MHD

STROUD ENGINEERING, P. A.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
3302-C BRIDGES STREET
MOREHEAD CITY, NORTH CAROLINA 28557
W WW.STROUDENGI NEER.COM
LICENSE NO. C-0647
May 13, 2019
Morehead City DCM
400 Commerce Ave.
Morehead City, NC 28557
RE: 126 S Ferry Dock Road, Harkers Island - Major CAMA Narrative
Michael P. Richter, the owner and developer of 126 S Ferry Dock Road in Harkers Island, NC
would like to fill a portion of a low-lying area on the lot. The purpose of the fill is to provide access to
the shoreline. The lot is a single-family lot with 70 ft of shoreline located on Back Sound. There exist
both 404 wetlands and coastal wetlands on the property adjacent to the shoreline and drainage path.
Please see attached plan sheet for wetland boundaries and proposed project information.
The fill area has been limited to a portion of the 404 wetland area with the coastal wetland area
remaining untouched. An existing bulkhead will be extended to support the fill on the east lot line. A
piped underdrain will be placed under the fill to maintain a drainage path for the wetland on the
adjacent property.
If you have any concerns or comments please do not hesitate to contact me at Stroud
Engineering P.A,
Sincerely,
Sam Bell, P.E.
sbellCa)stroudengineer.com
252-247-7479 ext.224
RECEIVED
JUN 0 6 2019
DCM-MHD CITY
101E COMMERCE STREET 102D CINEMA DRIVE 3302C BRIDGES STREET
GREENVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 27858 WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403 MOREHEAD CITY, NORTH CAROLINA 28557
252,766.9352 910.815.0775 252.247.7479

NORTH CAROLINA, CARTERET COUNTY
[,ewment and INS certificate are duty Ned in
FIlf t INN
the date and ame and In are Book and Page $Born
on the first page hereof.
FOR RE6I6TRATRyONBR'.^c.ER OF DEEDS
B'IiBdBia
GV l.r�t C.t" NC
March 31, M2 03:18.26 PM
° ° 'd4
CWNTFR DEED 3 P
FEE: $26. ee
NC REVEWE STAMP: $500.00
FILE 1 14042N
1
Ptgredby.rkbaWaIq,.301Co>®eveAKSz IO2,M.,d dCiq,NC2a557
RWnn to Dcbra W Wlry
Pmcd#733514322607 and 733514321566
SfamPcf500
NORTH CAROLINA GrNERAL WARRANTY DEED
This Deed made this the 14 day of March 2012, by and between JJL Red Estate, LLC, a
NC Limited Liability Company, PO Box 21793, Charlatan, SC, 29413, hereinafter referred
to as GraqW and Mkhad P,.gjehter .4 wife, Jane E. Richter
Q11 :JtYai-�,Y E� Kd, QWlb7ot I\jC'. Q'15jq hereinafter referred to as Grantee.
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herds shall include said parties, their heirs,
successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculmeS feminine, or neuter av
required by context
That Grantor, for valuable cownderation paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is
hereby acknowledged, has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the
Grantee in fee simple, all that certain lot or parcel of land situated in Harkens Island Township,
Carteret County, North Carolina, and mom particularly described as follows:
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBfr A
BEING the same property previously conveyed in Book 1265, Page 87 and 88.
Also conveyed with this property is the use of the Septic Easement per the Septic
Encroachment Agn ement and Easement in Book 1403 Page 149 of the Carteret County Registry.
This conveyance— ism X is not the primary residence of the Grantors.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and
appurtenances thereto belonging to the Grsntee in fee simple.
1300K� 0 PAGES O
3
RECEIVED
JUN 0 2019
DCM-MF D CITY

AND the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee
simple, has the right to convey the same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear
of all encumbrances, and that Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the lawful claims
of all persons whomsoever except for the exceptions hereinafter stated: Any covenants,
easements, a other items of record
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor bas caused this instrument to be signed in their
names, die day and year fast above written
Entity JJL Real Es LLC
(SEAL)
Jennifer Deage
STATE of S. ---m f 1.;.,
COUNTY of C-, n'
1, V� x J (- a Notary Public of the aforesaid County
and State do hereby certify that Jennifer LePage as MembedManaga of JJL Reel Estate, LLC, a
Limited Liability Company authorized to operate in North Carolina, personally came before me
this day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein
expressed on behalf of and with the fall authority of JJL Real Estate, LLC. Witness my hand
and seal this � 84 day of March 2012.
My Commission Expires: , r _ " is
i? ! �—
Notary Public
Print Name:r�.--
BOOK I`��PAGE age
RECEIVED
JUN 0 6 2019
DCM-MHD CITY

Exhibit A
BEING ALL OF TRACT I AND TRACT' 2 AS SHOWN ON THAT FINAL
RECOMBINATION PLAT ENTMED "MAP PREPARED FOR JENNN27ER LEPAGE" AS
RECORDED IN THE CARTERET COUNTY REGISTRY AT MAP BOOK 31 PAGE 387.
ALSO CONVEYED HERBWrrH IS AN ACCESS RASEM�NT TO SAID TRACC FOR
INGRESS EGRESS AND REGRESS OVER THAT SAID 45 FOOT ACCESS EASEMENT
SHOWN ON THE HEREIN REFERENCED MAP AT MAP BOOK 31 PAGE 387 OF THE
CARTERET COUNTY REGISTRY.
ALSO CONVEYED HEREWIPH ARE AIL EASEMENTS REFERENCED IN THE PRIOR
DEED DESCRIPTIONS AND AS SHOWN ON THE RECORDED PLAT IN MAP BOOK 31
PAGE 387.
BOOK]��?AGEc�M..
RECEIVED
JUN 0 `ru99
DC"H CRy

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FOR CAMA PERMIT APPLICATION
Name of Property Owner Requesting Permit: y 1�C,,6eL, E �_-kCVkl �
Mailing Address: 2�-� W1��pr
r _, � C 1n , I � c .
Phone Number:
Email Address:
1 certify that I have authorized
to act on my behalf, for the purpose of applying for and obtaining all CAMA per its
necessary for the following proposed development: G
at my property located at I 2-fa ISO uT0A IF"�Y w7��
in Wit��T County.
1 furthermore certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to
Division of Coastal Management staff, the Local Permit Officer and their agents to enter
on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application.
Information:
Signature
iy L- -t' .
Print or Type Name
f�wNZ_C__
�Title
1- f 6
Date
This certification is valid through 5 / / 2 0 RECEIVED
JUN 06 2019
DCM-MHD CITY

■ Complete Items 1, 2, and 3.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Ch^rltf STgley
130 S Vtcry DUCK Kd-
HRRkeRJ 1Sf kNO , KC, Z9516
IIIIIIIII IIII I'IIII II IIIIII III III I III IIII I III
9590 9402 3799 8032 5941 04
p Artinle Number lllerASief from aBrvlce Iaonn
7019 0160 0000 1781 3660
PS Form 3811, July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3.
•'Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
t. Article Addressed to:
Dmnp QvICK
q21 wRIT6 rnFMditlwL CHURCH Ra-
WiLl.OW SP2lrrG , NC
Z-151Z- 8827
❑ Agent
all dressee
B. 9eceived by (PAnted ply ) .Date of Delivery
�Cf
D. Is delivery address different from 17 Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Service Type
❑ Priority Mail Express®
❑ Adult Signature
❑ Registered MafP
❑ Adult Signature Restricted Delivery
O Registered Mail Restricted
❑ Certified Mail®
Delivery
❑ Certified Mail Restricted Delivery
D Return Receipt for
❑ Collect on Delivery
❑ Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery
Merchandis❑ Signature ConfirmationTM
-- Mail
0 Signature Confirmation
.—I - . o,.......w ner.,,e.,,
1
Restricted Delivery
f<
Domestic Return Receipt
Agent
Is � delivery ilfl ess j�fre0t rt " No ❑
If VES, a r;delivereI 7 ❑ No
3. Service Type ❑ Priority Mall Express®
0 Adult IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiiIIIII DCertifiedMw®ResVictedDelivery [I Regire 0 stered Mail MailrRestflcted
9590 9402 4706 8323 9607 90 D ClMall Restricted Delivery ❑ Return Receipt for
❑ Collect
ector Delivery Merchandise
❑ Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery 0 Signature Confirmation'.
Article Number fTrensfer /corn service labe4 f, .__..__..,ail ❑ Signature Confirmation
7 018 2290 0001 1726 4299 iil Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery
PS Form 3811, July 2015 PEN 7530-02-000-9053
Domestic Return Recalpt .
RECEIVED
JUN 06 Z019
DCM-MHD CITY

Coastal Management
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Stroud Engineering, P.A.
C/O Sam Bell
3302-C Bridges St.
Morehead City, NC 28557
Dear Mr. Bell:
ROY COOPER
- Gmemor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
BRAXTON DAVIS
Dwcmr
7/22/19
The NC Division of Coastal Management hereby acknowledges receipt of your application for State
approval for development at 126 S. Ferry Dock Rd. The complete package was received on 6/20/19. The
projected deadline for making a decision is 9/3/19. An additional 75-day review period is provided by law
when such time is necessary to complete the review. If you have not been notified of a final action by the
initial deadline stated above, you should consider the review period extended. Under those circumstances,
this letter will serve as your notice of an extended review. However, an additional letter will be provided
on or about the 75th day.
If this agency does not render a permit decision within 70 days from 6/20/19, you may request a meeting
with the Director of the Division of Coastal Management and permit staff to discuss the status of your
project. Such a meeting will be held within five working days from the receipt of your written request and
shall include the property owner, developer, and project designer/consultant.
NCGS 113A-119(b) requires that Notice of an application be posted at the location of the proposed
development. Enclosed you will find a "Notice of Permit Filing" postcard which must be posted at the
property of your proposed development. You should post this notice at a conspicuous point along your
property where it can be observed from a public road. Some examples would be: Nailing the notice card
to a telephone pole or tree along the road right-of-way fronting your property, or at a point along the road
right-of-way where a private road would lead one into your property. Failure to post this notice could
result in an incomplete application.
An onsite inspection will be made, and if additional information is required, you will be contacted by the
appropriate State or Federal agency. Please contact me if you have any questions and notify me in
writing if you wish to receive a copy of my field report and/or comments from reviewing agencies.
I
Davenport RECEIVED
Management Representative
Enclosure JUL 2 3 2019
cc: Doug Huggett, Major Permits Coordinator
Roy Brownlow, District Manager/Compliance Coordinator RqP SECTION MHD
State of North CaNpGna I Environmental Quality I Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave I Morehead City, NC 28557
252 808 2808

CAMA
JUL 2 3 2019
VIP SECTION MHD
PERMIT
APPLIED FOR
APPLICANT:
0 t

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
&Cmwy
BRAXTON DAVIS
Coastal Management
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Dwaor
Carteret News Times
Re: Public Notice — Carteret Co.
Dear Sir:
Please publish the attached Notice in the 7/28/19 issue of the Carteret News Times.
The State Office of Budget and Management require an original Affidavit of Publication prior to
payment for newspaper advertising. Please send the affidavit, an original copy of the published
notice, and an original invoice to Jessica Gibson, NC Division of Coastal Management, 400
Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557, Telephone [phone].
Thank you for your assistance in this matter. If you should have any questions, please contact
me at our Morehead City office
J. Ryan
Representative
Enclosure
cc: Roy Brownlow, District Manager
Doug Huggett, Major Permits Coordinator
RECEIVED
JUL 2 3 2019
Pxn Croft-rf^wl NNW_rr%
State of Notth Catolim I Environmental Quality I Coanal Management
400 Commerce Ave I Morehead City, NC 28557
252 808 2808

NOTICE OF FILING OF
A PPLICATION FOR CAMA
MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
The Department of Environmental Quality hereby gives public notice as required by NCGS
113A-119(b) that an application for a development permit in an Area of Environmental Concern
as designated under the CAMA was received on 6/20/19. According to the application, Mr.
Michael Richter applied to fill 609ft2 of wetlands at 126 S. Ferry Dock Rd. on Harkers Island. A
copy of the entire application may be examined or copied at the office of Ryan Davenport, NC
Division of Coastal Management, located at 400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, NC, (252)
808 2808 during normal business hours. Comments mailed to Braxton C. Davis, Director,
Division of Coastal Management, 400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, N.C. 28557, prior to
8/17/19, will be considered in making the permit decision. Later comments will be accepted and
considered up to the time of permit decision. Project modification may occur based on review
and comment by the public and state and federal agencies. Notice of the permit decision in this
matter will be provided upon written request.
PUBLISHED ON: 7/28/19
JUL 2 3 2019
MP SECTION MHD
Stale of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave I Morehead City, NC 28557
252 808 2808

0 `**This is a word processing form to be completed in Microsoft Word***
MC Division of Coastal Management
Malor Permit Application Computer Sheet
Applicant: Michael Richter 1/3
Project Site County., Carteret
Staff., JRD District: ElEfizabeth City Washington
®Morehead City El Wilmington
Project Name: Michael Richter
Rover File: WA
Date of initial application submittal (EX.. 1/82007): &W19
Date application "received as complete" in the Field office (EX: 1/8r2007): 820/19
Permit Authorization: 0 CAMA SDredge 8 Fill Both
SITE DESCRIPTION/PERMIT INFORMATION
PNA: Yes ❑No
Photos Taken: Yes® No[--]
Setback Required (riparian): Yes
No
Critical Habitat [I Yes SNo Not Sure
15 foot waiver obtained: Yes 23No
Hazard Notification Returned:
❑Yes ®No
SAv:®Yes ❑No ❑Not Sure
Shell Bottom: Yes ®No ❑Not
Temporary Impacts., ®Yes ❑No
Sure
Sandbags: []Yes ®No Not Sure
Did the land use classification come from
Mitigation Required (optional):
countyl-UP.®Yes []No
[]Yes ®No
Moratorium Conditions: Yes No
Environmental Assessment Done:
®NA
❑Yes ®No ®NA
SECONDARY WATER CLASSIFICATION — OPTIONAL (choose MAX of 4)
Future Water Supply (FWS)
LJ Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW)
Swamp Waters (SW)
High Quality Waters (HQW)
ID Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW)
WETLANDSIMPACTED
(404) Corp. of Engineers (Jurisdictional
(LS) Sea lavender (Limonium sp.)
❑ (SS) Glasswort ( Salicomia sp.)
wetlands)
LJ (CI) Saw grass (Cladium jamaicense)
(SA) Salt marsh cordgrass (Spartina
(Sr Salt reed grass (Spartina
altemiflora)
cynosuroides)
❑ (DS) Salt or spike grass (Disttchlis
LJ (SC) Bullmsh or three square (Scirpus
(TY) Cattail (Typha sp.)
spicata)
sp.)
LJ (JR) Black needlemsh (Juncus
U (SP) Salt/meadow grass (Spartina
RECEIVED
roemerianus)
patens)
APPLICATION FEE
JUL 2 3 2019
PIP SECTION MHD
252.808.2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastalmanaaement.net revised: 02115/10

WC Division of Coastal Mgt. a►p 1cation Computer Sheet, Page of 4)
❑ No fee required - $0.00
1 Private w/D&F up to 1 acre;
III(D) Priv. public or comm w/D&F to 1
can be applied - $250
cre; 3490 can't be applied - $400
❑ Minor Modification to a CAMA Major
El Major Modification to a CAMA Major
❑ IV Any development involving D&F of
permit - $100
permit - $250
more than 1 acre - $475
❑ Permit Transfer- $100
❑ III(B) Public or commercial w/D&F to 1
❑ Express Permit - $2000
acre; 3490 can be applied - $400
❑ Major development extension request-
❑ II. Public or commercial/no dredge
$100
and/or rill - $400
❑ 1. Private no dredge and/or rill - $250
❑ 111(C) Priv. public or comm w ID&F to 1
acre; 3490 can be applied; DCM needs
DWQ agreement - $400
JUL 2 3 2019
SEC-rION UND
revised 02115/10

NC Division of Coastal Mgt. Application Computer Sheet, Page 3 of 4)
Michael Richter
Date:7122119
Describe below the ACTIVITIES that have been applied for. All values should match the dimension order, and units of
measurement found in your Activities code sheet.
Number
TYPE
Choose
One
REPLACE
Choose
One
Dimension 1
Dimension 2
Dimension 3
Dimension 4
Fill
1
15'
40,
New Work
Mat' ❑
Replace
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work Ll
Maint ❑
Replace
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work❑
Maint ❑
Replace
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work
Maint ❑
Replace
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work
Maint ❑
Replace
❑.Y ❑ N
.
New Work
Maint ❑
Replace
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work❑
Maint ❑
Replace
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work Ll
Maint ❑
place
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work
Maint ❑
Replace
❑ Y ❑ N
New Work❑
Maint ❑
Replace
❑ Y ❑ N
,
New Woik=
Maint [I
Replace
❑ Y ❑ N
J U L
2 3 2019
New Won=❑
Maint ❑
Replace
❑ Y ❑ N
revised 02115MO

INC Division of Coastal Mgt. Application Computer Sheet, Page 3 of a)
Applicant: Michael Richter
Date: 7/22(19
Describe below the HABITAT disturbances for the application. All values should match the name, and units of measurement
found In your Habitat code sheet
Habitat Name
DISTURB TYPE
Choose One
fill
TOTAL Sq. Ft.
(Applied for.
Disturbance total
includes any
anticipated
restoration or
temp impacts)
FINAL Sq. Ft.
(Anticipated final
disturbance.
Excludes any
restoration
andror temp
impact amount)
TOTAL Feet
(Applied for.
Disturbance
total includes
any anticipated
restoration or
temp impacts)
FINAL Feet
(Anticipated final
disturbance.
Excludes any
restoration andlor
temp impact
amount
404 Weiland
609ft,
600'
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
RECEIVED
JUL 2 3 2019
MP SECTION MF[®
252.808-2808 :: 1-888.4RCOAST :: www.nccoastaimanacement.net revised: 02115/10

Wi,i9
C�L� 6-1q-7
MAJOR PERMIT FEE MATRIX
Applicant: AC:1 AAM \C14fY
aks S - Feyry pa.y-
HZ
Development Type
Fee
DCM %,
DWQ %
114300 1601 4351000931625 6253)
(243001602 435100095 2341)
I. Private, non-commercial
development that does not
$250
100%($250)
0%($0)
HL]E
involve the filling or
excavation of any wetlands
or o en water areas:
II. Public or commercial
development that does not
$400
100%($400)
0%($0)
involve the filling or
excavation of any wetlands
or open water areas:
:::F
fication to a
$250
100% ($250)
0% ($0)
or en
elopment that
filling and/or
of up to 1 acre
and/or open
water areas, determine if A,
B, C, or D below applies:
III(A). Private, non-
commercial development, if
$250
100% ($250)
0% ($0)
General Water Quality
Certification No. 4097 (See
attached can be applied:
III(B). Public or commercial
development, if General
100% ($400)
0% ($0)
Water Quality Certification
No. 4097 (See attached)
III
can be applied:
III(C). If General Water
Quality Certification No.
t$4006O%($240)
40% ($160)
4097 (see attached) could
be applied, but DCM staff
determined that additional
review and written DWQ
concurrence is needed
because of concerns
related to water quality or
aquatic life:
III(D). If General Wa:No.
Quality Certification
$400
60% ($240)
40% ($160)4097
(see attached)nnot
be applied:
IV. For development that
El F 14
involves the filling and/or
$475
60% ($285)
40% ($190)
excavation of more than
RECEIVED
one acre of wetlands and/or
III open water areas:
JUN U6 cuu
DCM-MHD CITY

F_
Received From: —
Permit No.:
(, Applicant's Name: _
Project Address:
NC Division of Coastal Management,
Cashier's Official Receipt 8707 A B C 'D
Date: 20 �11
s
1
Check No.: 1
County:
Please retain receipt for your records as proof of payment for permit issued.
Signature of Agent or Applicant: -
Signature of Field Representative:
Date:
Date:

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secremry
BRAXTON DAVIS
Director, At woa ofCi i
Management
23 July 2019
MEMORANDUM:
FROM: Gregg Bodnar, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
NCDEQ - Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave., Morehead City, NC 28557
Fax: [phone] (Courier04-16-33)
grecig.bodnar(ccDncdenr.gov
SUBJECT: CAMA Major Permit Application Review
Applicant: Michael Richter
Project Location: 126 S. Ferry Dock Rd., Harkers Island
Proposed Project: Proposes to fill 609ft2 of 404 wetlands to level yard to better access shoreline
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
return this form to Gregg Bodnar at the address above by 8113119. If you have any questions regarding the
proposed project, contact Ryan Davenport [phone] when appropriate, in-depth comments with
supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
'"Additional comments may be attached""
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
PRINT
AGENCY RECEIVED
SIGNATURE J u 2 3 J
DATE NIP SECTM N h110
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave. Morehead City, NC 28557 [phone]

DCM Cool
Applicant:
Distributed Yes® No ❑
Distribution Date: 7174i/9
AGENCY
WIRO
WARO
//
6r
LPO
G�. y r�
2*achel Love Adrick MHC
Rachel Love Adrick Washingon
DCM Planner
Mike Christenbury Wilmington
Charlan Owens Eliz City
US COE:
Liz Hair
Raleigh Bland (Beaufort, Camden, Chowan,
(Carteret Onslow, Pender)
Craven, HertfaM, Hyde, Perquimans, Tyrrell)
Tyler Crumbley (Temporarily away
Josh Peletier— (Bertle, Currituck, Dare, Gates,
everything goes to Liz)
Pamlico, Pasquotank, Washington)
USCOE (NC DOT)
(Brunswick, New Hanover)
DOT - TomSteffans— (Beaufort, Carteret,
DOT Brad Shaver
Craven, Pamlico
(Brunswick, New Hanover, Onslow,
Pender)
Mark Zeigler (Onslow, Pender, New
Community Assistance
Hanover, Brunswick)
Lee Padrick (Beaufort, Carteret Craven, Elk
Lee Padrick (Beaufort Carteret Craven
City, Pamlico, Washington)
Eliz City, Pamlico, Washington
Cultural Resources
Renee Gledhill -Earley
Renee Gledhill -Earley
Underwater Archaeology
Chris Southerly or Nathan Henry
Chris Southerly or Nathan Henry
Div. of Water
Infrastructure
Heidi Cox
Clif Whitfield
Curt Weychert WIRO
Marine Fisheries
Shane Staples MHC
Shane Staples WARO/ECRO
NC DOT
David Harris
David Harris
Shellfish Sanitation
Shannon Jenkins & Sharon Gupton
Shannon Jenkins & Sharon Gupton
State Property
Tim Walton & Mike Moser & Wanda
Tim Walton & Mike Moser & Wanda Hillard
Hillard
Sheri A. Montalvo
DEMLR/DWR:
Sheri A. Montalvo �,( rQ
(NC DOT)
Kristy Lynn Carpenter
Kristy Lynn Carpenter
DEMLR
Sediment & Erosion
Dan Sams
Sami Dumpor p�
�r�a"rEt.D
RE
Storm water
Christine Hall
Roger Thorpe Ca
DWR 401
Robb Mairs (Carteret New Hanover
Anthony Scarbraugh
Onslow, Pender,)
3 �(
Chad Coburn (Brunswick)
JUL 2 l
(NC DOT)
Joanne Steenhuis Brunswick, New
Garcy Ward
Hanover, Onslow, Pender
, ,,
A61
WRC
Maria Dunn (WARD)
Maria Dunn (WA ""
WRC (NC DOT)
Travis Wilson
Travis Wilson
Natural Heritage Program
Rodney Bulter
Rodney Bulter
1
T:\MAJOR PERMITS SECTION\Permits\Forms and Templates\Admin\Maj Comment Distribution Sheet 2019.docx
Revised : 5/7/2019

Form DCM MP-2
EXCAVATION and FILL
(Except for bridges and culverts) O
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation and/or fill activities. All values should be given i n feet.
Access
Other
Channel
Canal
Boat Basin
Boat Ramp
Rock Groin
Rock
(excluding
(NLW or
Breakwater
shoreline
NWL
stabilization
Length
65
Width
55
Avg. Existing
NA
NA
n/a
Depth
Final Project
NA
NA
n/a
Depth
1. EXCAVATION ®This section not applicable
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or NWL in b. Type of material to be excavated.
cubic yards.
c. (1) Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlands/marsh
(CM, submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SIB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL
a. Location of disposal area.
c. (i) Do you claim title to disposal area?
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA
(ii) If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner
e. (i) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL []None
(ii) Describe the purpose of disposal in these areas:
d. High -ground excavation in cubic yards.
®This section not applicable
b. Dimensions of disposal area.
d. (i) Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance?
[]Yes ❑No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, where?
f. (i) Does the disposal include any area in the water?
[]Yes []No []NA
(ii) If yes, how much water area is affected?
RECEIVED
JUN 06 2019
DCM-MHD CITY
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOA3T n www.nccoastalmanaeement.net revised: 12/20/06

Foi ni DCM IMP- (GkC.AY tl;)n anti P-II. Cage L ,f
3. SHOREUNE STABIUZATION ®This section not applicable
(N development is a wood groin, use MP-4 - Structures)
a. Type of shoreline stabilization:
❑Bulkhead ❑Riprap ❑BreakwateriSlll (-]Other.
a Average distance waterward of NHW or NWL:
e. Type of stabilization material:
g. Number of square feet of fill to be placed below water level.
Bulkhead backfill _ Riprap
Breakwater/Sill _ Other
i. Source of fill material.
b. Length:
Width:
d. Maximum distance waterward of NHW or NWL:
I. (i) Has there been shoreline erosion during preceding 12
months?
Dyes ❑No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, state amount of erosion and source of erosion amount
information.
h. Type of fill material.
4.
OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES
❑This section not appilkable
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a.
(i) Will fill material be brought to the site? ®Yes ❑No ❑NA
b. (i) Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands/marsh (CW),
If yes,
submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or
other "bands (W L)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
(ii) Amount of material to be placed in the water Q
number of square feet affected.
(iii) Dimensions of fill area 2196 sa ft
❑CW _ ❑SAV ❑SB
(iv) Purpose of fill
OWL Si.).3 ❑None
Access to shoreline
(ii) Describe the purpose of the fill in these areas:
Access to shoreline
5.
GENERAL
a.
How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion
b. What type of construction equipment will be used (e.g., dragline,
controlled?
backtloe, or hydraulic dredge)?
No stockpiling necessary, all fill material will be placed on she and
dump truck, small earth mover
permanently stabilized within 7-14 days
a
(1) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the project?
d. (i) Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project
❑Yes No ®NA
site? Dyes ®No DNA
pi) B yea, explain what type and how they will be implemented.
(it) If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
Date r ' \ J///\\
\/
Project Name
RECEIVED
JUN 06 2019
DCM-MHD CITY