27-20 Application April 2019 Draft

CARTERET COUNTY SHALLOW DRAFT NAVIGATION
WATERWAYS
ATLANTIC HARBOR MAINTENANCE DREDGING
CAMA MAJOR PERMIT APPLICATION
APRIL 2019 [DRAFT]
Prepared By:
Moffatt & Nichol
272 N. Front Street, Ste. 204
Wilmington, NC 28401
Prepared For:
Carteret County
302 Courthouse Square
Beaufort, NC 28516
RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY

Carteret County Shallow Draft Navigation Waterways
Atlantic Harbor Maintenance Dredging
CAMA Major Permit Application
Table of Contents
Tab Description
A. Permit Narrative
B. Form MP-1
C. Form MP-2
D. Permit Drawings
E. Geotechnical Analysis
F. Chemical Analysis
G. Risk Assessment
4 H. White Point Ownership and Easement
1. Agent Authorization
J. Riparian Property Notices
4K. Property List & Certified Receipts
RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY

Carteret County Shallow Draft Navigation Waterways
Atlantic Harbor Maintenance Dredging
CAMA Major Permit Application
Tab A: Permit Narrative
RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY

Carteret County Navigation Project
Maintenance Dredging of Atlantic Harbor
Permit Narrative
(March 2019)
Project Purpose, Need & Scope
Carteret County (County) is requesting federal and state authorization to conduct maintenance dredging
within the entrance channel and inner harbor of Atlantic Harbor of Refuge. The Atlantic Harbor of Refuge,
authorized under Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, was constructed in 1972. It is in the
mainland unincorporated community of Atlantic and situated off Core Sound 3 miles west of Ophelia Inlet.
Figure 1 shows the Atlantic Harbor vicinity in plan view. The harbor is important to the local fishing
industry as a place of safety, and access to the Atlantic Ocean. As such, the harbor facilitates a vital
component contributing towards the continued longevity of the local community.
CARTERET COUNTY, NC
Atlantic
Harbor
Sea Ophene
Lew' Inlet
Atlantic
Bmofnn Ocean
'Na ri
Figure 1. Atlantic Harbor Vicinity Map (NTS)
The Atlantic Harbor of Refuge is a federally -authorized project that has been historically maintained by the
USACE; however, the USACE has experienced difficulty in dredging the harbor recently due to the lack
of an upland material placement facility. The Wilmington District (SAW) notified Carteret County of the
maintenance difficulties in June of 2017 and requested the County take actions to construct a placement
facility and potentially dredge the harbor'. In response to the USACE's notification, Carteret County has
secured a material placement facility and intends to maintenance dredge the inner harbor of refuge and
entrance channel.
The maintenance work will remove approximately 13,200 cubic yards (CY) of silty material from the
proposed work areas as shown in Appendix D (permit drawings). The maintenance work maintains
consistency with the federal authorization for Atlantic Harbor and provides a maximum 40-ft channel at
elevation -6-ft MLLW +1 through the harbor entrance. The template also maintains a 51-1:1 V sideslope to
discourage additional sediment sloughing from the adjacent area. Within the harbor entrance, the side slopes
increase to a 31-1:1 V to minimize the dredging footprint. The proposed channel width and depth also reduces
within the harbor entrance to a minimum width of 16-ft at elevation -5-ft MLLW +1. Inside the harbor, the
maintenance template maximizes the dredging potential by expanding to approximately 190-ft wide with
' Medlock, J. (2017, June 29) Letter to County Manager. USACE. Wilmington Districts. RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY

Carteret County Navigation Project
Maintenance Dredging of Atlantic Harbor
Permit Narrative (March 2019)
5H:1 V side slopes. However, the template maintains the maximum dredge depth of -5-ft MLLW +1 as
proposed for the entrance channel. Appendix D (permit drawings) provides additional details describing
the maintenance template.
An emergency maintenance dredging project along the entrance of Atlantic Harbor was permitted (GP#
71340) and conducted in the summer of 2018 to provide short-term relief of the shoaling impacts. This
maintenance dredging project removed approximately 1,000 cubic yards (CY) to create a narrow channel
through a heavily shoaled area immediately outside of the harbor entrance. However, the County now
intends to conduct a more extensive maintenance operation to provide a long-term solution for the local
navigation needs.
The navigation channel is authorized for a width of 75 feet at elevation -7-ft MLLW with 3H:1 V side slopes.
However, a recent hydrographic survey conducted by Carteret County shows elevations outside the harbor
entrance of -2 to -4 feet MLLW. Inside the harbor, elevations range between -4-ft and d-ft MLLW.
Therefore, the County is proposing maintenance dredging to restore navigational access and preserve the
harbor of refuge status. Appendix A (permit drawings) shows the existing contours representing the
referenced hydrographic survey, along with cross -sections with existing and proposed depths identified.
Sediment Compatibility
To support development of a dredging plan and associated permitting, sediment cores from Atlantic Harbor
were collected and tested in March 2018 (Appendix E). Based on review of the analysis for geotechnical
vibracore samples the dredge material is considered not beach compatible and will be placed in an upland
placement facility on nearby White Point.
In addition to geotechnical analysis, five sites were sampled for chemical analysis beginning inside the
harbor entrance and extending southwest along the existing channel (Appendix F). Chemical analysis on
the core composites was conducted in accordance with the USACE guidance, Sediment Testing Guidelines
for Dredged Material Proposed for Disposal in Federal Project Disposal Areas by Applicants, along with
other screening guidelines. The results of the chemical analysis were used to develop a risk assessment
(Appendix G).
Results of the analysis showed some parameters greater than selected screening levels. These included
concentrations of certain metals, semi -volatile organic compounds, and pesticides within the harbor and
near the entrance. Additional testing outside of the harbor showed decreased levels of these same
contaminants. Semi volatile organic data for these stations were primarily non -detect or below the reporting
limit and there were no exceedances of the screening levels. For metals outside the harbor, there were
limited elevated concentrations (i.e., total chromium and manganese).
Since there were some elevated concentrations of certain contaminants based on the screening analysis,
further analysis of the cumulative effects of multiple contaminants was conducted using a risk calculator
developed by the Division of Waste Management (DWM). Designed to evaluate multiple exposure routes
associated with contaminated environmental media, the calculator estimates the risks associated with
current or potential future human exposure. The risk calculator was populated with sediment core data from
three sites representing the areas to be dredged and in consultation with DWM staff2.
Application of the risk tool showed potential risk associated with arsenic and chromium for all three sites
with the addition of thallium for one site. However, the cumulative risks under the User Defined receptor
2 Robbins, S. (2018, October 4) Phone call to 910-796-7217.
RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY

Carteret County Navigation Project
Maintenance Dredging of Atlantic Harbor
Permit Narrative (March 2019)
covering periodic use for a recreator and a trespasser do not exceed the benchmark assumptions in the tool.
Further, chemicals like arsenic, chromium, and thallium have natural and common anthropogenic sources
that are likely influencing the results at these stations. The Resident receptor is not applicable in these cases
because, the dredge disposal site, White Point, does not have residential development. In addition, Carteret
County intends to file a deed stipulation disallowing any future residential development on the property. A
copy of the recorded deed restriction shall be provided to DCM prior to the commencement of the dredging
activities. In summary, the results demonstrate that disposal of the dredge material on White Point does not
pose a significant risk to human health or water quality.
Construction Methodology and Sediment Placement
Approximately 13,200 CY of dredge spoil will be directly placed in a Carteret County -owned site adjacent
to the work area referred to as "White Point' and shown on Figure 2. Dredging operations will be conducted
by a bucket dredge/excavator between November 16 and March 31 in efforts to minimize the potential for
environmental impacts. Dredging activities will extend through day light hours but will not entail night
time operations. Material will be dredged from the Atlantic Harbor channel and placed on a barge or other
floating work plant. A turbidity control barrier will be utilized and remain until sediment in the water
column has settled. The material will be transported to the disposal site on White Point. A backhoe or
excavator will move the material from the barge to a truck or other hauling equipment on White Point where
it will be placed and contained within an earthen berm.
The County has provided a letter verifying ownership of White Point as well as secured an easement for
construction equipment access (Appendix H). All dredge spoil will be placed a minimum of 30-ft landward
from MHW.
Figure 2. Material Disposal Site (White Point)
The dredged material will be dewatered and placed within the upland disposal site with the intent of
permanent storage. Earthen berths will be used to prohibit the effluent waters from reentering the adjacent
RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
OCM-MHD CITY

Carteret County Navigation Project
Maintenance Dredging of Atlantic Harbor
Permit Narrative (March 2019)
water bodies. In addition, turbidity curtains will be maintained surrounding the offloading site during times
of dredging activities. The curtains will be positioned to capture any sediment disposition spilling from the
construction process.
Prior to placement of dredge spoils, the spoil containment basin and berms will be inspected to ensure the
effectiveness and capacity to contain the material. The Division of Coastal Management (DCM) will be
notified so a representative may inspect the site to help verify the appropriate BMPs have been established
to help control the dredge effluent and material run-off. In addition, DCM will be notified immediately in
the unlikely event of containment breech.
Environmental Concerns
Based on meetings with regulatory agencies in December 2017 and 2018, the anticipated major regulatory
requirements include 408 Review through the USACE Civil Works branch, a Coastal Area Management
Act (CAMA) major permit, and USACE General Permit (GP) 2878. The GP 2878 is issued by the USACE
Wilmington District "to authorize maintenance dredging within federally authorized navigation channels
and borrow areas, and the discharges of excavated and/or fill material within federally approved confined
upland disposal areas or, in the case of beach quality sand, federally authorized beach retention areas or
federally authorized beach nourishment project areas in the state of North Carolina."
Additional input from resource agencies indicated no Biological Assessment for protected species nor a
SAV survey would be required. Other requirements include chemical testing of dredge material following
DWM guidelines due to the nature of expected dredged material (i.e., muddy). Water flow from dewatering
of dredged material will be directed towards the inner harbor to avoid impacts to shellfish in Core Sound.
Dredging activities will be restricted to November 16 through March 31 for additional protection towards
potential impacts. The cooler months generally offer a lower risk for environmental impact.
Historic Resources
An archaeological assessment has not been completed for the proposed dredging; however, the site is a
federally authorized navigation channel and has been dredged since the 1940's.
North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)
The project involves expenditure of public funds and is in compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA).
SEPA applies for any project that meets all three of the following criteria, an environmental document must
be prepared:
1. An expenditure of $10 million in funds provided by the state of North Carolina for a single project
or action or related group of projects or action
Or
land -disturbing activity of equal to or greater than 10 acres of public lands resulting in substantial,
permanent changes in the natural cover or topography of those lands (or waters)
2. An action by a state agency, and
3. Has a potential detrimental environmental effect upon natural resources, public health and safety,
natural beauty, or historical or cultural elements, of the state's common inheritance.
RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY

Carteret County Navigation Project
Maintenance Dredging of Atlantic Harbor
Permit Narrative (March 2019)
Since the project is less than $10 million and disturbs less than 10 acres of public land, further
environmental documentation under SEPA is not required.
In addition, under 15A NCAC O1C .0408, this project does not meet minimum criteria associated with
development requiring a Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) permit or a State Dredge and Fill Law
permit because it involves "maintenance activities associated with maintaining the traditional and
established use of a channel."
Summary
In summary, the County is requesting state and federal authorization to conduct maintenance dredging of
Atlantic Harbor to aid navigation and preserve the health and safety of boaters traversing in and out of the
harbor. A total of approximately 13,200 CY will be dredged and placed on County -owned White Point,
which was also the material placement location for the previously conducted emergency project. The
proposed maintenance dredging will restore the channel to depths in the inner and outer harbor to -5-ft
MLLW +1 to -6-ft MLLW +1 inclusive of a 1-ft overdredge tolerance.
Sediment analysis confirmed the material is not beach compatible and that the chemical quality was such
that placement on White Point with no residential uses was appropriate and did not present a significant
risk to the public.
The proposed work will follow additional guidelines and recommendations to avoid or further minimize
the potential for environmental impacts during construction. This includes constructing during the cooler
winter months of November through March, as well as the use of turbidity curtains, a containment berm,
and silt fence.
RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY

Carteret County Shallow Draft Navigation Waterways
Atlantic Harbor Maintenance Dredging
CAMA Major Permit Application
Tab B: Form MP-1
RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY

APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
(last revised 12127106)
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1. Primary Applicant/ Landowner Information
Business Name
Carteret County
Project Name (if applicable)
Atlantic Harbor Dredging Project
Applicant 1: First Name
Gregory
MI
Last Name
Rudolph
Applicant 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
If additional applicants, please attach an additional pages) with names listed.
Mailing Address
302 Courthouse Square
PO Box
City
Beaufort
state
INC
ZIP
28516
Country
us
Phone No.
252-728-8485 ext.
FAX No.
252-222-5826
Street Address (N different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
[e-mail]
2. Agent/Contractor Information
Business Name
Moffatt & Nichol
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Robert
Neal
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
Stale
272 N. Front Street, Suite 204
Wilmington
NC
ZIP
Phone No. 1
Phone No. 2
28401
910 - 218 - 7100 ext.
- - ext.
FAX No. -
Contractor a
919 781 4869
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State ZIP
Email
[e-mail]
<Form continues on back>
RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastalmanagem"-MHD CITY

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 2 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
3. Project Location
County (can be multiple)
Street Address
State Rd. #
Carteret
Atlantic Harbor
Subdivision Name
City
State
Zip
N/A
Atlantic
NC
28511 -
Phone No.
Lot No.(s) (d many, attach additional page with list)
ext.
I I,
a. In which NC river basin Is the project located?
b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
White Oak River Basin
Core Sound
c. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade?
d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
®Natural ❑Manmade []Unknown
Core Sound
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
f. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
®Yes ❑No
work falls within.
Carteret County
4. Site Description
a. Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.)
b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.)
2,800
4.2
C. Size of individual lot(s)
d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
NWL (normal water level)
(If many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list)
N/A ❑NHW or ❑NWL
e. Vegetation on tract
The navigation channel is a previously impacted system and heavily maintained; therefore, no significant resources
including vegetation occur within the area.
f. Man-made features and uses now on tract
Fixed and floating docks, bulkheads, and the previously dredged channel.
g. Identify and describe the existing land uses adiaoent to the proposed project site.
Residential and undeveloped land located adajcent to the existing marina and navigation channel.
h. How does local government zone the tract?
I. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
Government
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
®Yes []No ❑NA
J. Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? ❑Yea ®No
k. Hasa professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, aftach a copy. ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, by whom?
I. Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does ft involve a ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
National Register listed or eligible property?
<Form continues on next page> RECEIVED
APR 01 Z019
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastalmanageme tCM-MHD CITY

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 3 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
m. (i) Are there wetlands on the site? ®Yes []NO
(ii) Are there coastal wetlands on the site? ®Yes []No
(III) If yes to either (i) or (ii) above, has a delineation been conducted? ❑Yes ®No
(Attach documentation, if available)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
N/A
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
N/A
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems.
N/A
5. Activities and Impacts
a.
Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use? ❑Commercial ®Public/Government
❑Private/Community
b.
Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
Atlantic Harbor provides recreational and commercial navigation access.
c.
Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
Mechanical dredging equipment entailing an barge and bucket excavator. Dredge spoil will be placed on a work barge and
transported to a adajecent disposal site, White Point. 13,200 CY to be dredged and placed upland on White Point.
d.
List all development activities you propose.
N/A
e.
Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? Maintenance
f.
What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project? 2.74 ❑Sq.Ft or ®Acres
g.
Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area ®Yes ONO ❑NA
that the public has established use of?
h.
Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
Small quantities of dredge effluent can be expected to runoff from the work barge during material transport, otherwise the
effluent will be contained within the hauling equipment. Once placed on White Point, the material will be contained using silt
fencing and a bens.
i.
Will wastewater or stonnwater be discharged into a wetland? []Yes ONO ❑NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water? ❑Yes ONO ®NA
j.
Is there any mitigation proposed? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal.
<Form continues on back> RECEIVED
nDD n t 701J
252-808.2808 :: 1-888-4RCOA3T :: www.ncconstaimanagement.net
DOM-MID CITY

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 4 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
6. Additional Information
In addition to this completed application form, (MP-1) the following items below, if applicable, must be submitted in order for the application
package to be complete. Items (a) - (0 are always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
instruction booklet on how to property prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
f. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name James Wesley Bumpus - Phone No.
Address 110 Locust Lane, Beaufort, NC 28516
Name Mark and Eric Smith Phone No.
Address 299 Moms Marina Rd, Atlantic, NC 28511
Name Charles and Cindy Styron Photo No.
Address 101 Core Sound Loop Rd., Atlantic, NC 28511
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, pemlittee, and issuing dales.
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, if applicable.
I. Welland delineation, if necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
it. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10), if necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
1 7. Certification and Permission to Enter on Land I
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Date
Print Name _Gregory
Signature
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed project.
®DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information ❑DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
❑DCM MP-3 Upland Development
❑DCM MP-4 structures Information RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
252.808-2808 :: 1.888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastalmanagement.netDCM-MHD CITY

DCM-MHD CITY

11 AERIAL PROVIDED BY NC ONE"
S�
q
J
'1/qr
15+00
N
14+00
,e9
13+00
12+00
_eo
11 +00
3
10+00
-•'
CORE
SOUND
9+00
FEDERAL NAVIGATION
CHANNEL LIMITS 8+00
(ATLANTIC HARBOR OF
REFUGE)
7+00
6+00
a9 _e?
_eo
AtlmW
SW $14le 3hNte Deu.iry CummlJaOve
SIeBm (�
�OIIIQLW)
WIM I►3')
(�:V7
IoIR)
Vetume lCVJ
ef00 Ix3.IJ
6MLW+1
3:1
0.6
]+09 123.D
6MLW+1
3:1
0.8
8«9p 12).1]
6MLW+1
3:1
10
9+a9 123.1]
6MLW+1
!:1
1.3
I9a0p 123.1]
6MLW+1
s:l
L4
I N(q li].tl
6MLW+t
49
3:1
IJ
I2*90 123.D
6MLW+1
40
YI
3.4
13a00 123.tl
6MLW+1
40
5:1
6.5
/I
14a00 123.IJ
6MLWH
40 :
!:1
9.1
IxI.D
6MLW+1
40 .
s:l
t.2
3,A3
Q3.1]
6MLW+1
40..
5:1
1.6
Oj88
-It+00 123.D
6MLW+1
40
sa
to
s3e9
19+W 98.66
6MLW+I
40..
3:1
102
6,2t0
20VW,. 9tb6
6MLWH
407
11
9.1
]1]8
2 9t.66
6MLW «Imlm0.
11
IO.I
t,xJe
63.J4
6MLW +1
l3 '-
5'.I
10.0
9,291
41 44
Mir35.]
6MLW «I
20
}I
4.6
9,658
mail 43.66
-3 MLW •I
16
31
4.9
9,t95
8888� 8888�
IN
OS.e6
-5 MLW +I
20
3'.I
4.1
10,343
GRAPHIC SCALE FEET
43.66
-s MLW aI
4s
YI
40
19,J4J
xl.et
-s MLW +I
55
Y.1
3.0
I LD9]
LEGEND
" 7{b0 " 25.6t
-3 MLW al
190
YI
62
II55!
CHANNEL CENTERLINE
xwao 13.N
-! MLW «I
190
s:l
!.0
12,114
CHANNEL BASE (TOES)
35.68
-! MLW +I
Y.1
3.8
�33!
- - - - - SIDE SLOPE DREIXIING LIIo/1T
u.w
-s MLw a I
so
3.x
In
� DREDGE AREA (CHANNEL BASE)
x5.6t
-3 MLW * I
Y.i
ee
" "i DREDGE AREA SIDE SLOPE
23 et
-1 MLW fI
RI
1.1
ELEVATIONS REF. MLLW AS DEFINED BY
CARTERET COUNTY
Fgt�@ 28, 2019
NOAA TIDE GAUGE 8655875(SEA LEVEL). SHALLOW DRAFT NAVIGATION WATERWAYS
RECEI�$Vg6RY
ATLANTIC HARBOR
MAINTENANCE DREDGING
SHEET 2 OF 12
LOCATION MAP
DCM-MHD CITY

DCM-MHD CITY

10
'w
z
0
F
a
-10
w
-20
-1+00
10
0
z
0
F
w -10
J
w
-20
-1+00
0+00 1+00
STATION 6+00
L
z
0
Iq
a
w
W
10
0
-20
-1+00
0+00 1+00
STATION 7+00
0+00 1+00 -1+00 0+00 1+00
STATION 8+00 STATION 9+00
LEGEND FOR REVIEW ONLY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
- — — - EXISTING GRADE
DESIGN TEMPLATE
— OVERDREDGE TEMPLATE
DREDGE AREA
ELEVATIONS REF. MLLW AS DEFMED BY
NOAA TIDE GAUGE 9655975 (SEA LEVEL). O®
VERTICAL SCALE: 1--10'
CARTERET COUNTY RECEIVED
SHALLOW DRAFT NAVIGATION WATERWAYS HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"-100'
ATLANTIC HARBOR MAINTENANCE DREDGING
PG. a OF 12 STA 6+00 TO 9+00 APR 01 Z 019
FE R ARY 28 2019
DCM-MHD CITY

1
-21
-1+00
10
0
z
0
F
a
L -10
w
-20
-1+00
0+00 1+00
STATION 10+00
10
-20
-1+00
0+00 1+00
STATION 11+00
0+00 1+00 -1+00 0+00 1+00
STATION 12+00 STATION 13+00
LEGEND FOR REVIEW ONLY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
- — — - EXISTING GRADE
DESIGN TEMPLATE
OVERDREDGETEMPLATE
DREDGE AREA
ELEVATIONS REF. MLLW AS DEFINED BY
NOAA TIDE GAUGE 8655975 (SEA LEVEL).
CARTERET COUNTY
SHALLOW DRAFT NAVIGATION WATERWAYS
ATLANTIC HARBOR MAINTENANCE DREDGING
PG. 5 OF 12 STA I0+00 TO I3+00
0' S' to'
VERTICAL SCALE: 1"-10'
RECEIVED 0.
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"-100'
APR 01 2019
FEBR ARY 29. 2019
nrne_MHD CITY

A
10
—20
—1+00
10
0
—20
—1+00
0+00 1+00
STATION 14+00
Z
O
F
Iq
w
—1+00 0+00 1+00
STATION 15+00
10
3
J 0
—20
0+00 1+00 —1+00 0+00
STATION 16+00 STATION 17+00
1+00
LEGEND FOR REVIEW ONLY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
- - - - EXISTING GRADE
DESIGN TEMPLATE
- OVERDREDGE TEMPLATE
DREDGE AREA
ELEVATIONS REF. MLLW AS DEFINED BY
NOAA TIDE GAUGE 8655875 (SEA LEVEL). 0®
VERTICAL SALE: 1"'
RECEIVED a
CARTERET COUNTY
SHALLOW DRAFT NAVIGATION WATERWAYS HORIZONTAL SCALE: V-100'
ATLANTIC HARBOR MAINTENANCE DREDGING A P P Q j 2019
PG.6 OF 12 STA 14+00 TO 17+00 FEBRUARY28,2019
DCM-MHD CITY

10
10
1
eMt
3 0
o w
� 0—
0
v
v
j
J —10
w� —10
w
w
—20
—20
—1+00 0+00 1+00
—1+00 0+00
1+00
STATION 18+00
STATION 19+00
10
10
ne
kill
0
0
Z F. LL}
o
Z !
O
.
F
F
w� —10—
—10
w
w
-20
-20
-1+00 0+00 1+00
-1+00 0+00
1+00
STATION 20+00
STATION 21+00
LEGEND FOR REVIEW ONLY -
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
— — — — EXISTING GRADE
DESIGN TEMPLATE
— — OVERDREDGE TEMPLATE
DREDGE AREA
ELEVATIONS REF. MLLW AS DEFINED BY
NOAA TIDE GAUGE 8655875 (SEA LEVEL).
0®
RECEIVED VERTICAL SCALE 1"-10'
CARTETY
SHALLOW DRAFT NAVIGATION WATERWAYS
HORIZONTAL
SCALE: 1"-100'
ATLANTIC HARBOR MAINTENANCE DREDGING
APR 01 2019
STA 19+00 TO 21+00
PG. 7OF 12
FEBR ARY 28 2019

10
10Hill
-
iiiiii
tj
3 Y0
MiLL- i
J 0
J
D
tz
V
V
Z +
O
Z
O
M,Y
F
F
Q A
-10
Q
I�Ji -10
R
w
w
-20
-20
-1+00 0+00 1+00
-1+00
0+00
1+00
STATION 22+00
STATION 22+50
10 I-
10
1
1 IT I I I II
0
01
O MIY
O
MIY _P
ge LT
R
Q
1 —10
Q
lo-
w
W
—20
—20
—1+00 0+00 1+00
—1+00
0+00
1+00
STATION 23+00
STATION 24+00
EXI GC� SMESLOPESRVIERPR6IFDf APAIALPHOtt1G
HY.
LEGEND FOR REVIEW ONLY -
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
- — — -EXISTING GRADE ,
DESIGN TEMPLATE
— — OVERDREDGE TEMPLATE
DREDGE AREA
ELEVATIONS REF. MLLW AS DEFINED BY
0®
NOAA TIDE GAUGE 8655975 (SEA LEVEL).
RECEIVED VERTICAL SCALE: r"-10'
V
sv tar
CARTERET COUNTY
SHALLOW DRAFT NAVIGATION WATERWAYS
HORIZONTAL SCALE: V-100'
APR 01 2019
ATLANTIC HARBOR MAINTENANCE DREDGING
PG. 8OF 12 STA 22+00 TO 24+00
FEBRUARY 28 2019

tz
10
0
-20
-1+00 0+00 1+00
STATION 25+00
E%ISISNO CHANNEL SIDE SLOPES D IURE'IED FROM AERIAL PHOPOORAPIIY.
ri
-2
-1+00 0+00 1+00
STATION 26+00
-2+00 -1+00 0+00 1+00
STATION 27+00
LEGEND
- - - -EXISTING GRADE
DESIGN TEMPLATE
OVERDREDGETEMPLATE
DREDGE AREA
ELEVATIONS REF. MLLW AS DEFINED BY
NOAA TIDE GAUGE 8655875 (SEA LEVEL).
FOR REVIEW ONLY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
CARTERET COUNTY RECEIVED
SHALLOW DRAFT NAVIGATTON WATERWAYS
ATLANTIC HARBOR MAINTENANCE DREDGING
STA 25+00 TO 27+00 APR 0 1 2019
0® '
VERTICAL SCALE: 1"-10'
HORIZONTAL SCALE: V-100'
2019 1
DCM-MHD CITY

z
0
F
w
w
-2+00 -1+00 0+00 1+00
STATION 28+00
-2+00 -1+00 0+00 1+00
STATION 29+00
LEGEND FOR REVIEW ONLY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
- - - - EXISTING GRADE
DESIGN TEMPLATE
OVERDREDGE TEMPLATE
DREDGE AREA
ELEVATIONS REF. MLLVI AS DEFINED BY
NOAA TIDE GAUGE 8655875(SEA LEVEL).
RECEIVED
0®
VERTICAL SCALE:
I"-lV
0' 80'
100'
CARTERET COUNTY
APR 01 2019
HORIZONTAL SCALE:
1"-1 00'
SHALLOW DRAFT NAVIGATION WATERWAYS
ATLANTIC HARBOR MAINTENANCE DREDGING
STA 28+00 TO 29+00
DCM-MHD CITY
PG. 10 OF 12
__.
FEBRUARY 28. 20I9

3
z
0
F
w
-2+00 -1+00 0+00 1+00
STATION 30+00
10
0
A
z
0
F
Q
, -10
w
-20
-2+00 -1+00 0+00 1+00
STATION 31+00
LEGEND FOR REVIEW ONLY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
— — — — EXISTING GRADE
DESIGN TEMPLATE
— OVERDREDGE TEMPLATE
DREDGE AREA
ELEVATIONS
OAA TIDE GAUGES 95; D> RECEIVED o®
VERTICAL SCALE: 1"-10'
0 Stl low
CARTERET COUNTY APR 01 2019
SHALLOW DRAFT NAVIGATION WATERWAYS HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"-100'
c.uoF12 A 0+00O31++ AAA C STT00HAOR EDREDGING DCM-MHD CITY

Z
0
F
w
w
LEGEND
0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00
- - - - EXISTING GRADE
DESIGN TEMPLATE
- OVERDREDGE TEMPLATE
DREDGE AREA
ELEVATIONS REF. MLLW AS DEFINED BY
NOAA TIDE GAUGE 9655975 (SEA LEVEL).
STATION 32+00
FOR REVIEW ONLY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
CARTERET COUNTY
SHALLOW DRAFT NAVIGATION WATERWAYS
ATLANTIC HARBOR MAINTENANCE DREDGING
PG 12 OF 12 STA 32+00
RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY
VERTICAL SCALE: 1"-10'
0' w 1w
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"-100'

Carteret County Shallow Draft Navigation Waterways
Atlantic Harbor Maintenance Dredging
CAMA Major Permit Application
Tab E: Geotechnical Analysis
RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY

ATLANTIC OCEAN
eV
CAPELOOKOUT
I J
..,`
,_ 1 BEAUFORT
PAMLICO SOUND
4
JJy./ .♦ �YY ��
NEUSE RIVER `

Page 13
Section 2: Methodology
Athena utilized our 35-foot research vessel, Artemis (Figure 2), to act as the
sampling platform for this project. Artemis was equipped with all required United States
Coast Guard (USCG) safety gear and was operated by a USCG -certified 100 Ton
Master Captain. A Trimble Differential Global Positioning System (capable of sub -meter
accuracy) interfaced with HYPACK was utilized for primary navigation. Horizontal
coordinates were recorded in North American Datum of 1983 State Plane Coordinate
System, North Carolina (Zone 3200), U.S. Survey Feet. Real-time tide elevation data
were obtained using a Champion TKO Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS)
receiver interfaced with the North Carolina Continuously Operating Reference Station
Network, which served as the base station.
l _ >A73-.
Figure 2: Research vessel Artemis offshore of Mobile Bay, Alabama.
During field operations, Artemis was immobilized over the desired sample sites
using spuds. Once on station, the coordinates at the vessel location were compared
with the coordinates for the desired sample location to ensure accurate vessel
positioning. A vibracore location map has been included as Figure 3. Upon
satisfactory positioning, a water depth was collected via lead line. Subsequently, the
tide elevation was recorded in North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88) at
each sample location and was converted to MLLW using the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration's Vertical Datum Transformation (VDatum) software
program (Version 3.6.1). The converted data, in conjunction with the recorded water
depth, were then used to determine the sediment surface elevation in relation to MLLW
at each sample location. Vertical (and horizontal) data conversions are summarized in
Table 1.
RECEIVED
A P R O 1 2019 t293 Fam Road, PO Box 68
McC ellanvil e, South Carolina 2 W8
HE [phone]
DCM-MHD CITY w .athenatechnologies.com

FIGURE 3: VIBRACORE LOCATION MAP
ATLANTIC HARBOR
CARTERET COUNTY NAVIGATION PROJECT, NC
W
�HENA
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
MARCH
2018
VIBRACORE
HST I NORTH
HORIZOTAL DATUM:
NC STATE PLANE
ZONE 3200
NAD83
US SURVEY FEET
C RECEIVED
WHITE 03
AH- POINT
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CI
® VIBRACORE
�.. LOCATION
IMAGE SOURCE:
USDA
Athena Technologies, Inc.
PO Box 68
McClellanville, SC 29458
843-887-3800

Is
TABLE 1
HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL DATA CONVERSION SUMMARY
ATLANTIC HARBOR
Boring ID
Data Conversion Input Parameters n1
Data Conversion Output Parameters
State Plane Coordinates M
East (x) North (y)
Elevation 131
(NAND 88)
Geographic Coordinates
Latitude Longitude
Elevation
(MLLW)
AH-01
2,799,429.58
422,746.27
1.08
34.8820363
-76.3340428
1.75
AH-02
2,799,681.27
423,143.13
0.70
34.8831123
-76.3331760
1.36
AH-03
2,799,934.31
423,513.57
0.73
34.8841098
-76.3322883
1.38
AH-04
2,799,954.70
423,977.08
0.70
34.8854001
-76.3322022
1.34
AH-05
2,799,405.96
424,263.90
0.62
34.8862010
-76.3339523
1.27
AH-06
2,799,398.50
423,197.85
0.80
34.8832888
-76.3341171
1.46
AH-07
2,799,984.56
422,844.07
1.06
34.8822683
-76.3321839
1.72
n1= Coordinate and elevation convention conducted vie the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) Veracal Datum Transformation (VDatum) software, Version 3.6.1.
1�1= Horizontal coordinates were recorded in the field and are referenced to North American Datum of 1983. State Plane Coordinate System, NoM Carolina (Zone 3200), US Survey Fast.
Notes
131= Elevation data were recorded in the field using a Champion TKO Global Navigation Satellite System unit interfaced wait the North Carolina Continuously Operating Reference Station (CORS) Network.
NAVD 88 = North American Vertical Datum of 1988
MLLW = Mean Lower Low Water
v
�
r
n
�
m
n
_
o
m
v
n
0
<
m
-c
1293 Graham Faro, Road, PO Box 68
McClellan 4lle. South Carolina 29458
ME [phone]
TrC-H—N U-LUUTEr IN www.athenatechndnies.com

Page 16
A custom -designed and fabricated vibracore system was utilized to collect the
geotechnical vibracores. The vibracore system consists of a generator with a
mechanical vibrator attached via cable to a 3-inch diameter, galvanized sample barrel.
The sample barrel was lowered until the bottom of the barrel was directly above the
sediment surface. The vibracore machine was turned on and the sample barrel was
allowed to penetrate until the bottom of the sample barrel reached project depth. Once
the sample barrel reached project depth, the machine was turned off and the sample
barrel was retrieved using an electric winch. The cores were then capped, labeled, and
cut into 5-foot sections. A summary table containing final location coordinates,
elevation data, and penetration and recovery lengths has been included as Table 2.
The completed cores were opened longitudinally at Athena's core processing
facility in McClellanville, South Carolina. The cores were photographed after opening
and were logged in accordance with protocol outlined in ASTM D 2488 and ASTM D
2487. One composite sample was collected to a depth of -11.5' MLLW from each core.
Furthermore, discrete samples were collected from targeted sediment intervals in each
core. The composite and discrete samples were submitted to Terracon Consultants,
Inc. (Terracon) in Jacksonville, Florida, for analysis. Terracon is a USACE-accredited
geotechnical laboratory. All samples were analyzed for grain size distribution in
accordance with ASTM D 6913 using the following sieve sizes: 3/4", 5/8", 7/16", 5/16",
No. 3.5, No. 4, No. 5, No 7, No. 10, No.14, No. 18, No. 25, No. 35, No. 45, No. 60, No.
80, No. 120, No. 170, No. 200, and No. 230. The laboratory also conducted visual
percent shell determination for each sample using the Terry and Chilingar method
(1955). The composite samples were analyzed for carbonate content in accordance
with the Twenhofel and Tyler acid digestion method (1941). A summary of laboratory
results is presented in Table 3. Core photographs and logs have been included as
Appendix A, and laboratory analytical reports have been included as Appendix B.
RECEIVED
APR p 1 2019
DCM-MHD CITY
1293 Graham Farm Road, PO Box 68
McClellanville, South Carolina 29458
A!WHE [phone]
TECHNOLOGIES. I" - w .athenatechnologies.com

17
TABLE 2
GEOTECHNICAL VIBRACORE SUMMARY
ATLANTIC HARBOR
Coordinates
Tide Tide
Sediment
Bottom
Elevation of
Boring ID
Collection
Time
Elevation m
Water Depth
Surface
Recovered
penetration
Recovery
Nobs
Dab
East North
(it MLLVY)
(ft)
Elevation
Core
(ft)
(ft)
(x) (�)
(1t MLLW)
it MLL
AH-01
3/27/2018
7:59
2,799,429.58
422,746.27
7.8
1.7
-6.1
-13.0
7.5
6.9
AH-02
3/27/2018
9:18
2,799,681.27
423,143.13
4.2
1.4
-2.8
-11.7
10.0
8.9
AH-03
3/27/2018
9:47
2,799,934.31
423,513.57
4.3
1.4
-2.9
.13.4
12.0
10.5
AH-04
3/27/2018
10:15
2,799,954.70
423,977.08
5.0
1.3
-3.7
-10.9
8.5
7.3
AH-05
3/27/2018
10:54
2,799,405.96
424,263.90
7.1
1.3
-5.8
-16.8
12.5
11.0
AH-06
3/27/2018
8:52
2,799,398.50
423,197.85
3.2
1.5
-1.7
-13.8
12.5
12.1
AH-07
3/27/2018
8:18
2,799,984.56
422,844.07
5.1
1.7
-3.4
-12.3
10.0
8.9
pl = Coordinates were recorded in North Amencan Datum of 1983. State Plane Coordinate System, North Carolina (Zone 3200), US Survey Feet
Notes
IM = Elevation data were recorded in the field!using a Champion TKO Global Navigation Satellite System unit interfaced with the North Carolina Continuously Operating Reference Station (CORS) Network.
rt=feet
MLLW = Mean Lower Low Water
1
m
n
o
m
=
�
<
o
N
m
n
o
v
1293 Graham Farm Road, PO Box 68
McCkllanvlle, South Camfine 29458
TECHHOLOGIC3. INC.www.alhenatechnolo9iea.tom

1
o
to Q
D
2
D
2
D
0
D
2
D
x
➢
2
s
�
0
610Z1
Q3
zmo
a
< O
V
Gl
J
m
Ce
+
r d
+ n
<
G O O
T
m
N
N
U
N
N
y
N
U
N
U
N
N
y
n
a
lUil
N
N
(yif
N
W
fN�l
fUJ
m
O
'O
O
O
U
m
{II
N
C
O
U
V
U
O
U
m
O
U
N
O
O
U
U
r/Pi
O
V
d
3
a
m
L
V
L
N
N
b
m
+O
A
N
O
O
W
s
0
6
b
J
S
O
in
4.
m
O
m
L
W
ro
O
m
+
p
W
3
GI
1
? m
m o
D
OD Co
m
D
°
ago c
m
03
A3
D
A
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0 W
0
O
0
O
0
O
o
O
b
O
o
O
io
J
0
O
0
O
o
O
a
m
o
O
a
O
S
p
S
S
S
W
N
O
+
o
O
O
O
o
O
O fm m
F.
�m
-n
ia A
m
at
m
m
J
A
m
W
m
V
m
f0
+
a
at
m
d
m
m
+
m
W
A
W
A
m
W
a
U
m
U
m
O
w
U
w n
O!
IV
iD
i
p�
�
pq
N
O
tJ
m
A
U
;O
A
�
m
>
m
m
C.
W
A
p fp p
H n..
+
.(J
W
G
p
A
0
N
S
m
ia
=m
6
ei A
W c m y
m c m
O
O
O
m
O
O
N
O
O
O
�
O
O
O
N
O
O
N
N
A 'Q O f�
3038

19
Boring ID
Top of Core
Elevation
(ft MLLW)
Sample ID
Sample Interval
(k bss) (ft MLL91)
Laboratory USCS
Classification
Percent
Gravel -Sized
Fraction Itl
Percent
Sand -Sized
Fraction m
Percent
Fine -Grained
Fraction PI
Percent
Carbonate/
Visual Percent
Shell l6l
C2
0-8.1
3.4 to-11.5
SM
0.67
85.74
13.59
0.6
AH-07
S1
0.5
3.9
Sp
0.00
99.50
0.50
0
-3.4
S2
3.0
-6.4
SP
0.00
96.49
3.51
2
S3
7.5
-10.9
SP-SM
0.00
93.87
6.13
0
It MLLW = %at reletive tc mean borer low water
a bss = feet below sediment surface
USCS = Unified Sod Classification System
Notes
0I = Defined as the sample fraction wni is retained on the Number 4 sieve (i.e., greater than 4.75 millimeters).
DI = Defined as the sample traction that is retained on various sieves between Me Number 4 end Number 200 sieves (i.e., sae between 4.75 and 0.074 millimeters, respectively).
RI = Defined as the sample fraction which passes the Number 200 sieve (i.e., less Man 0.074 millimeters).
I41=Percent carbonate determined using the Twenholel and Tyler acid digestion method (1941). Visual percent shell determined using the Terry and Chi ingar method (1965).
v
�
n
�
m
0
x
o
m
v
n
�
0
<
m
�
�
v
1293 Graham Farm Road, PO Box 68
McCledenville, South Carolina 29458
�../K [phone]
BN t INwww.athenalechnologies.com

Page 110
Section 3: References
ASTM Standard D2487, 2006e1. "Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for
Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System)", ASTM International,
West Conshohocken, PA. 2011.
ASTM Standard D2488, 2000. "Standard Practice for Description and Identification of
Soils (Visual -Manual Procedure)", ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
2000.
ASTM Standard D6913, 2004. "Standard Test Methods for Particle -Size Distribution
(Gradation) of Soils Using Sieve Analysis", ASTM International, West
Conshohocken, PA. 2004.
RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY
1293 Graham Farm Road, PO Box 68
McClellanville, South Carolina 29458
HE [phone]
e HN r iN w .athenatechnologies.com

Appendix A:
Core Photographs and Logs
RECEIVED
APP 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY
1293 Graham Farm Road, PO Box 68
McClellanville, South Carolina 29458
HE [phone]
NN r o w .athenatechnologies.com

n
z
K3
0
5
5
7
0
N
RECEIVED
ePR 01 2019
,ON
DOW-MIiD CITY
AH-01
Atlantic Harbor,
Carteret County
Navigation Project,
North Carolina
Moffatt & Nichol, Inc.
Notes:
Scale in Feet
Photo Mosaic Image
AWHENA
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Athena Technologies, Inc.
1293 Graham Farm Road
McClellanville, SC 29458
www.athenatechnolog;es.com
[phone]

Boring Designation AH-01
DRILLING LOG
CLIENT
PROJECT OMER
SHEET 1
Moffatt 8 Nichol
Carteret County, North Carolina
OF 1 SHEETS
�• PROJECT
9. SIiE AND TYPE OP BIT 3.0 In.
Carteret County Navigation Project
10. COORDINATE SYSTEMIDATUM i HORIZONTAL VERTICAL
Carteret County, North Carolina
NC State Plane NAD 1983 MLLW
Z RORING DESIGNATION LOCATION COORDINATES
11. MANUFACTURERS DESIGNATION OF DRILL Q AUTO HAMMER
AH-01 i X = 2,799,430 Y = 422,746
0 MANUAL HAMMER
3. DRILLING AGENCY I CONTRACTOR FILE NO.
DISTURBED UNDISTURBED (UO)
Athena Technologies, Inc.
12. TOTAL SAMPLES 1 3
4. NAME OF DRILLER
13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
P. McClellan
1a WATER DEPTH 1.7 Ft.
S. DIRECTION OF BORING , DEG. FROM i BEARING
:STARTED (COMPLETED
®VERTICAL 'VERTICAL
� INCLINED
15. DATE BORING i 03-27-18 07:59 i 03-27-18
6. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN 0.0 Ft.
16. ELEVATION TOP OF BORING -6.1 FL
7. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 0.0 Ft.
17. TOTAL RECOVERY FOR BORING 6.9 Ft.
18. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF INSPECTOR
a. TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING 7.5 Ft.
A. Freeze
D
BID
Oa
ELM.
Ill)
SCALE
(Rl
W
ri
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
Depth, and elevation, be,ed on measured values
%
REC.
CQ
R[1 ARM
-6.1
0.0
DD
Sample 1116-1, Depth = 0.5'
Mean (mm): 0.18, Phi Sorting: 0.41
Shell: 1 %, Fines (#200) - 14.65 (SM)
Silty SAND; mostly fine quartz sand, little
inorganic silt in burrows, matrix and layers,
Sample #C1, Depth = 0 - 5.4'
trace fine gravel -sized shell (primarily
Mean (mm): 0.19, Phi Sorting: 0.64
between 2.0-2.4'), soft/loose, bioturbated,
Carbonate: 0.5%, Fines (#200) -15.54 (SM)
very dark gray (5Y-3/1), ISM).
Sample #S-2, Depth = 3.0'
a
ro
Mean (mm): 0.16, Phi Sorting: 0.51
-10.1
4.0
Shell: I%, Fines (#200) -19.66 ISM)
Poorly graded SAND; mostly fine to medium
quartz sand, trace inorganic silt in burrows
Sample #S-3, Depth = 5.0'
and as rip -ups, trace medium to coarse
Mean (mm): 0.30, Phi Sorg: 0.95
m
-11.6
5.5
.'
sand -sized shell, loose, gray (6Y-5/1), (SP).
Shell: 1 %, Fines (#200) - 3.00 (SP)
•
Poorly graded SAND; mostly fine grading (at
-65) to medium quartz sand, trace inorganic
silt in burrows, loose to medium dense, olive
-12.8
6.7
5YA , SP .
Clayey AND; mos medium quartz sand,
little inorganic day, medium still/medium
dense dark olive brown 2.5Y-3/3 (SC).
End of Boring
RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
M-MHD CITY
SAJ FORM 1836 MODIFIED FOR THE FLORIDA DEP
JUN 02 JUN 04
0
5
10
15

0
1
2
K
`7
5
5
Co
7
DOO
E
10
AH=02
Atlantic Harbor,
Carteret County
Navigation Project,
North Carolina
Moffatt & Nichol, Inc.
RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY
Notes:
Scale in Feet
Photo Mosaic Image
A46FHEMAL
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Athena Technologies, Inc.
1293 Graham Farm Road
McClellanville, SC 29458
www.athenatechnologies.com
[phone]

Boring Designation AH-02
DRILLING LOG
CLIENT
I
PROJECT OWNER
SHEET 1
Moffatt & Nichol
Carteret County, North Carolina
or 1 SHEETS
1. PROJECT
9. SIZE AND TYPE OF SIT 3.0 In.
Carteret County Navigation Project
10. COORDINATE SYSTEMIDATUM HORIZONTAL VERTICAL
Carteret County, North Carolina
NC State Plane NAD 1983 MLLW
2. BORING DESIGNATION LOCATION COORDINATES
11. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL Q AUTO HAMMER
AH-02 1 X = 2,799,681 Y = 423,143
[3 MANUAL HAMMER
3. DRILLING AGENCY ' CONTRACTOR FILE NO.
DISTURBED ' UNDISTURBED IUD)
Athena Technologies, Inc.
12. TOTAL SAMPLES
1 3
4. NAME OF DRILLER
13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
P. McClellan
14. WATER DEPTH 1.4 Ft.
S. DIRECTION OF BORING i DEG. FROM i BEARING
STARTED COMPLETED
® VERTICAL ' VERTICAL
INCLINED (]
18. DATE BORING � 03-27-18 09:18 03-27-18
S. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN 0.0 Ft.
16. ELEVATION TOP OF BORING -2.8 Ft.
7. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 0.0 Ft.
17. TOTAL RECOVERY FOR BORING 8.9 Ft.
18. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF INSPECTOR
S. TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING 10.0 Ft.
A. Freeze
ELEV.
0
SCALE W CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
%
KW
OA
REMARKS
(R)
(R), W Deptas and elevations based on measured values
ABC.
GM
-2.8
0.0
83
Poorly graded with sit; mostly fine to
Sample #S-1, Depth = 0.5'
medium quartz sand, few inorganic and
Mean 0.25, Phi Sorting: 0.63
�
y
-3.6
0.8 organic silt in burrows and laminations,
softAoose, biolurbated, olive gray (5Y-5/2),
(mm):
Shell: 0%, Fines (#200) - 6.56 (SP-SM)
SP-SM .
-q 6
1.8 Silty SAND; mostly fine to medium quartz
sand, little inorganic and organic silt in
Sample #S-2, Depth = 1.5'
Mean (mm): 0.19, Phi Sorting: 0.51
N
N
burrows and laminations, sofVloose,
Shell: 1 %, Fines (#200) - 15.02 ISM)
bioturbatetl olive gray (5Y-4/2),ISM).
Sample #C2, Depth = 0 - 8.7'
N
Mean (mm): 0.19, Phi Sorting: 0.80
Carbonate: 1.2%, Fines (#200) - 53.78 (MI-1)
Fat CLAY; mostly inorganic Gay, trace fine
quartz sand in laminations and burrows,
trace organic silt in occasional lamination,
medium to high plasticity, soft to medium
stiff, very dark gray (5Y-3/1), (CH).
Sample #S-3, Depth = 7.0'
N
Mean (mm): 0.14, Phi Sorting: 0.79
Shell: 0%, Fines (#200) - 95.87 (MH)
-11.711
8.9
End of Boring
RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY
SAJ FORM 1836 MODIFIED FOR THE FLORIDA DEP
JUN 02 JUN 04
-10
15

I
2
3
n
Pi
5
0
N
C`J
W
10
11
12
i9?
15
AH =03
Atlantic Harbor,
Carteret County
Navigation Project,
North Carolina
Moffatt & Nichol, Inc.
Notes:
Scale in Feet
Photo Mosaic Image
<J�
AW"E HA
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
RECEIVED
Athena Technologies, Inc.
1293 Graham Farm Road
APR 01 2019 McClellanville, SC 29458
www.athenatechnologies com
DCM-MHD CI?' [phone]

Borinq Desiqnation AH-03
DRILLING LOG
'"EMT
PROJECT OWNER
I SHEET I.
Moffatt & Nichol
Carteret County, North Carolina
of , SHEETS
1. PROJECT
9. SIZE AND TYPE OF SIT 3.0 In.
Carteret County Navigation Project
10. COORDINATE SYSTEMIDATUM :HORIZONTAL VERTICAL
Carteret County, North Carolina
NC State Plane NAD 1983 MLLW
2 BORING DESIGNATION I LOCATION COORDWATH
11. MANUFACTURERS DESIGNATION OF DRILL Q�-I AUTO HAMMER
AH-03 i X = 2,799,934 Y = 423,514
[3 MANUAL HAMMER
S. DRILLING AGENCY I CONTRACTOR FILE NO.
DISTURBED I UNDISTURBED (UO)
Athena Technologies, Inc. ;
12. TOTAL SAMPLES 1 3
4• NAME OF DRILLER
13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
P. McClellan
1q, WATER DEPTH 1.4 Ft.
S. DIRECTION OF BORING , DEG. FROM i EMAININO
:STARTED (COMPLETED
®VERTICAL VERTICAL i
Q INCLINED i i
15. DATE BORING
03-27-18 09:47 i 03-27-18
B. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN 0.0 Ft.
16. ELEVATION TOP OF BORING -2.9 Ft.
7. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 0.0 Ft.
17. TOTAL RECOVERY FOR BORING 10.5 Ft.
18. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF INSPECTOR
S. TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING 12.0 Ft.
A. Freeze
ELEV.
IN)
D
SCALE W CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
IH)
h
EW
OG
REMARKS
w DPpMN And elevetlons Desed on measuretl values
REC.
C`
-2.9
0.0
Rw
Sample MS-1, Depth = 0.5'
N
Fat CLAY; mostly inorganic day, trace fine
Mean (mm): 0.21, Phi Sorting: 0.80
quartz sand in occasional lamination and in
Shell: 0%, Fines (0200) - 88.07 (MH)
layers from 2.2-2.5', trace organic sift in
occasional lamination, soft, medium to high
plasticity, very dark gray (5Y-3/1 ), (CH).
-5.8
2.9
Sample tS-2, Depth = 3.0'
Mean (mm): 0.28, Phi Sorting: 0.66
Poorly graded SAND with silt; mostly fine to
medium quartz sand, few inorganic silt in
N
Shell: 0%, Fines (f200) - 10.45 (SPSM)
-6.8
3.9 burrows and as rip -ups, coarse gravel -sized
oyster shell at 3.5% loose, gray (5Y-6/1),
SP-SM .
Sample •C1, Depth = 0 - 8.6'
Fat CLAY; mostly inorganic day, trace fine to
Mean (mm): 0.30, Phi Sorting: 0.69
medium quartz sand in layers from 4.9-5.3',
Carbonate: 0.5%, Fines (1200) - 36.47 ISM)
soft, medium to high plasticity, Very dark
gray (5Y-3/1), (CH).
.7
6.8
Sample YS-3, Depth = 7.5'
Poorly graded SAND; mostly fine to medium
U)
quartz sand, trace inorganic silt in
laminations, burrows, and as rip -ups, loose,
Mean (mm): 0.29, Phi Sorting: 0.51
gray (5Y-6/1), (SP).
Shell: 0%, Fines (0200) - 1.51 (SP)
-11.5
8.6
Poorly graded SAND with day; mostly
medium quartz sand, few inorganic day in
matrix throughout interval, medium
stiff/medium dense, borderline USCS = SC,
color grades to olive brown (2.5Y 4/3) from
-13.4
10.5 grayish olive, (10Y-52), (SP-SC).
RECEIVED
End of Boring
APE 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY
SAJ FORM 1836 MODIFIED FOR THE FLORIDA DEP
JUN 02 JUN 04
-0
-5
-10
-15

u
1
K
K?
n
5
5
0
7
�69
AH=04
Atlantic Harbor,
Carteret County
Navigation Project,
North Carolina
Moffatt & Nichol, Inc.
Notes:
Scale in Feet
9 Photo Mosaic Image
RECEIVED
101 APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Athena Technologies, Inc.
1293 Graham Farm Road
McClellanville, SC 29458
www athenatechnologies com
[phone]

Boring Designation AH-04
DRILLING LOG
CLIENT
PROJECT OWNER
I SNEET 1
Moffatt & Nichol
Carteret County, North Carolina
of 1 SNEETS
1. PROJECT
9. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT 3.0 In,
Carteret County Navigation Project
10. COORDINATE SYSTEMIDATUM HORIZONTAL VERTICAL
Carteret County, North Carolina
NC State Plane NAD 1983 I MLLW
2. BORING DESIGNATION LOCATION COORDINATES
11. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL Q AUTO HAMMER
AH-04 X = 2,799,955 Y = 423,977
(] MANUAL HAMMER
3. DRILLING AGENCY CONTRACTOR FILE NO.
DISTURBED UNDISTURBED (UD)
Athena Technologies, Inc.
12. TOTAL SAMPLES 1 3
4. NAME OF DRILLER
13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
P. McClellan
14. WATER DEPTH 1.3 R.
5. DIRECTION OF BORING :DEG FROM i BLARING
:STARTED COMPLETED
® VERTICAL VERTICAL
� INCLINED
1S. OAT! BORING
03-27-18 10:15 : 03-27-18
S. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN 0.0 Ft.
16. ELEVATION TOP OF BORING -3.7 Ft.
7. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 0.0 Ft.
17. TOTAL RECOVERY FOR BORING 7.3 Ft.
18. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF INSPECTOR
8. TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING 8.5 Ft.
A. Freeze
ELEV.
SCALE
D
W CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
%
MW
OA
XX
REMARKS
IN)
IN)
m DeptD* end elevation* Defeo on meesuM value*
REC.
-3.7
0.0
R�
Sample #S-1, Depth = 0.5'
Mean (mm): 0.22, Phi Sorting: 0.70
N
Shell: 0%, Fines (#200) - 88.66 (MH)
Fat CLAY; mostly inorganic Gay, little
inorganic silt in matrix, trace medium sand in
lamination at 0.7% trace organic silt in matrix,
wood fragment at 4.0', soft to medium stiff,
Sample #S-2, Depth = 3.0'
3.0'
low to medium plasticity, very dark gray
Mean mm : 0.21, Phi 0.71
( ) g
(5Y-3/1), (CH).
rh
Shell: 0%, Fines (#200) - 78.93 (MH)
Sample #C2, Depth = 0 - 7.3'
Mean (mm): 0.21, Phi Sorting: 0.98
-8.9
5.2
Carbonate: 0.6%, Fines (#200) - 50.63 (MH)
-9.3
5.6
Silty SAND; mostly fine to medium quartz
sand, little inorganic silt in burrows and
laminations soft1loosegray 5Y-6/1 ISM).
Sample #S-3, Depth = 6.0'
Poorly graded SAND with clay; mostly fine
y
Mean (mm): 0.18, Phi Sorting: 0.49
quartz sand, few inorganic clay in matrix and
Shell: 0%, Fines (#200) - 0.44 (SP)
in layers at 6.f! and 6.7-7.3', trace organic silt
-11.0
7.3
in burrows between 5.6-6.5', loose, olive
5Y-5/3). (SP-SC).
End of Boring
RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY
5AJ FORM 1836 MODIFIED FOR THE FLORIDA DEP
JUN 02 JUN 04
0
15

U
E
2
3
5
�41
lei
7
E
ll'J
IF
11
12
13
m
15
AH =05
Atlantic Harbor,
Carteret County
Navigation Project,
North Carolina
Moffatt & Nichol, Inc.
Notes:
Scale in Feet
Photo Mosaic Image
E IyA
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Athena Technologies, Inc.
RECEIVEO 1293 Graham Farm Road
McClellanville, SC 29458
www.athenatechnologies.com
APR 01 P.019 [phone]
,)CM

Boring Designation AH-05
DRILLING LOG
CLIlNT
PROJECT OWNER
SHEET 1
Moffatt &Nichol
Carteret County, North Carolina
OF 1 SHEETS
1. PROJECT
9. SIZE AND TYPE OF SIT 3.0 In.
Carteret County Navigation Project
10. COORDINATE SYSTEM/DATUM HORIZONTAL VERTICAL
Carteret County, North Carolina
NC State Plane NAD 1983 MLLW
2. BORING DESIGNATION LOCATION COORDINATES
11. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL Q AUTO HAMMER
AH-05 i X = 2,799,406 Y = 424,264
0 MANUAL HAMMER
3. DRILLING AGENCY CONTRACTOR FILE NO.
DISTURBED UNDISTURBED (U I)
Athena Technologies, Inc.
12. TOTAL SAMPLES
1 ; 2
C NAME OF DRILLER
13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
P. McClellan
14. WATER DEPTH 1.3 Ft.
5. DIRECTION OF BORING OEG. FROM BEARING
'STARTED COMPLETED
® VERTICAL VERTICAL
] INCLINED
15. DATE BORING
1 03-27-18 10:54 03-27-18
S. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN 0.0 Ft.
16. ELEVATION TOP OF BORING -5.8 Ft.
7. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 0.0 FL
17. TOTAL RECOVERY FOR BORING 11 Ft.
18. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF INSPECTOR
S. TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING 12.5 Ft.
A. Freeze
O
BW
OA
ELEV.
IN)
SCALE
IN)
W
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
NovatlonF
%
REC.
REMARKS
W
O"U,. And CBFW on moaaurR4 vNuoF
GS
-5.8
0.0
B�
Sample #S-1, Depth = 0.5'
Fat CLAY; mostly inorganic clay, little
N
Mean (mm): 0.16, Phi Sorting: 0.85
inorganic silt in matrix, trace organic silt in
Shell: 0%, Fines (#200) - 96.92 (MH)
laminations, very soft, low plasticity, very
dark gray (5Y-3/1 ), (CH).
_g,q
2,g
Sample #C2, Depth = 0 - 5.7'
Mean (mm): 0.21, Phi Sorting: 1.10
PEAT with silt; mostly peat, little organic and
Carbonate: 0.2%, Fines (#200) - 47.39 (SM)
inorganic silt in matrix, very soft, black
-9.6
3.8
(5Y-2.511), (PT).
Elastic SILT; mostly inorganic silt, little
-10.1
4.3
organic sift in matrix, few fine quartz sand in
matrix, very soft, low plasticity, very dark
gray 5Y-3/1 MH .
Sample #S-2, Depth = 5.0'
Mean (mm): 0.18, Phi Sorting: 0.51
Poorly graded SAND with silt; mostly fine
quartz sand, few organic silt in matrix and in
rn
Shell: 0%, Fines (#200) - 2.33 (SP)
layers, soft/loose, black (5Y-2.5/1), (SP-SM).
-12.0
6.2
Poorly graded SAND; mostly fine quartz
sand, trace organic silt in burrows and
laminations, large wood/root fragments from
6.5-8.0', loose. gray (2.5Y-6/1), (SP).
-13.6
7.8
Clayey SAND; mostly fine grading to medium
quartz sand, little inorganic Gay in matrix,
trace organic material (as roots), trace
coarse sand -sized quartz between 9.0-97,
dense/stiff, dark greenish gray (5GY4/1),
(SC).
-15.8
10.0
Poorly graded SAND; mostly fine quartz
sand, trace organic material (as roots), loose,
-16.8
11.0
••
light gray (5Y-7/1 ), (SP).
RECEIVED
End of Boring
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY
SAJ FORM 1836 MODIFIED FOR THE FLORIDA DEP
JUN 02 JUN 04
act
-5
10
•15

0
1
E
3
E
5
5
7
E
10
10
11
12
13
14
15
AH =06
Atlantic Harbor,
Carteret County
Navigation Project,
North Carolina
Moffatt & Nichol, Inc.
Notes:
Scale in Feet
Photo Mosaic Image
f�a>
,A" H E IyA
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
RECEIVED
Athena Technologies, Inc.
1293 Graham Farm Road
�NR 0 1 2��9
McClellanville, SC 29458
www.athenatechnologies.com
[phone]
DCM-MHD CITE

Boring Designation AH-06
DRILLING LOG
GUERT
PROJECT OVMER
SHEET 1
Moffatt 8 Nichol
Carteret County, North Carolina
OF 1 SHEETS
1. PROJECT
9. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT 3.0 In.
Carteret County Navigation Project
10. COORDINATE SYSTEM/DATUM HORIZONTAL VERTICAL
Carteret County, North Carolina
NC State Plane NAD 1983 I MLLW
z. BORING DESIGNATION LOCATION OOURDMATO
It. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL O AUTO HAMMER
AH-06 i X=2,799,399 Y=423,198
QMANUAL HAMMER
3. DRILLING AGENCY I CONTRACTOR FILE NO.
DISTURBED UNDISTURBED (Up)
Athena Technologies, Inc.
1z. TOTAL SAMPLES 1 3
4. NAME OF DRILLER
13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
P. McClellan
14. WATER DEPTH 1.$ F(.
5. DIRECTION OF BORING , DEC. FROM BEARING
:STARTED ICOGPLETID
®VERTICAL VERTICAL
Q INCLINED i i
15. DATE BORING
; 03-27-18 08:52 i 03-27-18
6. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN 0.0 Ft.
16. ELEVATION TOP OF BORING -1.7 Ft.
7. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 0.0 Ft.
17. TOTAL RECOVERY FOR BORING 12.1 Ft.
18. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF INSPECTOR
a. TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING 12.5 Ft.
A. Freeze
ELEV.
SCALE
D
w CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
%
IR
Ka
REMARKS
III
(NI
W Depths and elevations based on measured values
REC.
OQ
-1 7
0.0
mM
Sample #S-1, Depth = 0.5'
Silty SAND; mostly fine to medium quartz
Mean (mm): 0.22, Phi Sorting: 0.72
sand, little inorganic sift in matrix and in
Shell: 0%, Fines (#200) - 25.09 ISM)
burrows, trace fine to coarse sand -sized
shell, medium dense/medium stiff,
bioturbated, dark gray (SY4/1), ISM).
a.4
2.7
Sample #C2, Depth = 0 - 9.8'
'
U
Mean (mm): 0.20, Phi Sorting: 0.72
Carbonate: 0.8%, Fines (#200) - 6.85 (SP-SM)
Poorly graded SAND; mostly fine quartz
sand, trace inorganic and organic silt in
occasional burrow, trace medium to coarse
Sample #S-2, Depth = 5.0'
quartz sand, medium dense, gray (5Y-6/1),
di
Mean (mm): 0.15, Phi Sorting: 0.44
(SP).
Shell: 0%, Fines (#200) - 1.75 (SP)
8
7.1
V]
Poorly graded SAND; mostly fine to medium
quartz sand, trace inorganic silt in occasional
burrow, trace coarse quartz sand, medium
-10.0
8.3
dense light yellowish brown 2.5Y-6/3 (SP),
Poorly graded SAND with sift; mostly medium
quartz sand, few inorganic sift in matrix and
Sample AS-3, Depth = 9.0'
y
burrows, trace coarse quartz sand, medium
Mean (mm): 0.27, Phi Sorting: 0.74
dense, light yellowish brown (10YR-6/4),
Shell: 0%, Fines (#200) - 3.31 (SP)
(SP-SM).
-11.9
10.2
••
-12.2
10.5
Silty SAND; mostly fine to medium quartz
sand, little inorganic silt in matrix, little fine
sand to fine gravel -size shell, medium
dense/medium stiff, light brownish gray
2.5Y-6/2 SM .
Poody graded SAND; mostly fine grading to
1
12 1
medium quartz sand, trace inorganic sift and
RECEIVED
clay in matrix and in burrows, trace coarse
quartz sand, medium dense, color grades to
yellowish yelowshrbrvown (0YR-W4)o(SP).
APR 01 2019
End of Boring
DCM-MHD CITY
SAJ FORM 1836 MODIFIED FOR THE FLORIDA DEP
JUN 02 JUN 04
0
5
0
5

111
I
2
K?
2
61
E
0
7
rJ
10
AH=07
Atlantic Harbor,
Carteret County
Navigation Project,
North Carolina
Moffatt & Nichol, Inc.
RECEIVED
APR 01 Z019
DCM-MHD CITY
Notes:
Scale in Feet
Photo Mosaic Image
Ao&THENA
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Athena Technologies, Inc.
1293 Graham Farm Road
McClellanville, SC 29458
www.athenatechnologies.com
[phone]

Boring Designation AH-07
DRILLING LOG
CLIENT
PROJECT OYMER
SHEET 1
Moffatt & Nichol
Carteret County, North Carolina
OF 1 SHEETS
t. PROJECT
B. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT 3.0 In.
Carteret County Navigation Project
10. COORDINATE SYSTEMIDATUM HORIZONTAL VERTICAL
Carteret County, North Carolina
NC State Plane NAD 1983 MLLW
2. BORING DESIGNATION LOCATION COORDINATES
11, MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL Q AUTO HAMMER
AH-07 i X = 2,799,985 Y = 422,844
O MANUAL HAMMER
3. DRILLING AGENCY CONTRACTOR FILE NO.
DISTURBED UNDISTURBED (UD)
Athena Technologies, Inc.
1z. TOTAL SAMPLES 1 3
4. NAME OF DRILLER
13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
P. McClellan
14. WATER DERV 1.7 Ft.
5. DIRECTION OF BORING ;DEG. FROM i BRAKING
STARTED COMPLETED
® VERTICAL VERTICAL
INCLINED
0�
15. DATE BORING
03-27-18 08:18 : 03-27-18
5. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN 0.0 Ft.
16. ELEVATION TOP OF BORING -3.4 Ft.
7. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 0.0 FL
17. TOTAL RECOVERY FOR BORING 8.9 Ft.
18. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF INSPECTOR
S. TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING 10.0 Ft.
A. Freeze
D
Z
BM
0y
ELEV.
IN)
SCALE
(N)
In
W
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
DepMs and •levallons sued on measured values
%
REC.
GR
REMARKS
-3.4
0.0
09
Poorly graded SAND; mostly fine to medium
Sample #S-1, Depth = 0.5'
quartz sand, trace inorganic silt in occasional
rn
burrow, trace fine to coarse sand -sized shell,
Mean (mm): 0.28, Phi Sorting: 0.48
.4.7
1.3
.'
loose, light olive gray (5Y-6/2), (SP).
Shell: 0%, Fines (#200) - 0.50 (SP)
Poorly graded SAND with silt; mostly fine to
medium quartz sand, few inorganic silt in
matrix and burrows, trace fine to coarse
Sample #S-2, Depth = 3.0'
sand -sized shell, medium dense,
Mean (mm): 0.23, Phi Sorting: 0.67
ry
bioturbated, gray (5Y-5/1), (SP-SM).
y
Shell: 2%, Fines (#200) - 3.52 (SP)
N
-7.3
3.9
'
Sample #C2, Depth = 0 - 8.1'
Silty SAND; mostly medium quartz sand, little
inorganic silt in matrix, trace coarse quartz
U
Mean (mm): 0.30, Phi Sorting: 0.93
sand throughout interval, trace fine sand to
Carbonate: 0.6%, Fines (#200) - 13.59 (SM)
fine gravel -sized shell, medium dense,
bioturbated, color grades to olive (5Y 5/3)
from, dark gray (5Y-4/1), (SM).
-9.8
6.4
Poorly graded SAND with silt; mostly medium
quartz sand, few inorganic silt in matrix, trace
Sample #S-3, Depth = 7.5'
coarse quartz sand, medium dense, olive
Mean (mm): 0.34, Phi Sorting: 0.74
e
(5Y-5/3), (SP-SM).
-11.7
8.3
Shell: 0%, Fines (#200) - 6.12 (SP-SM)
Silty GRAVEL; mostly fine gravel -sized shell,
-12.3
8.9
little inorganic silt in matrix, little fine quartz
sand in matrix, loose, light olive gray
5Y-6/2 GM.
End of Boring
RECEIVED
APR U 1 2019
DCM-MHD CITY
SAJ FORM 1836 MODIFIED FOR THE FLORIDA DEP
JUN 02 JUN 04
0
5
10
[F:

Appendix B:
Laboratory Analytical Reports
RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY
1293 Graham Farm Road, PO Box 68
McClellanWle, South Carolina 29458
Htff [phone]
iN ' w .athenatechnologies.com

farracon
Consulting Engineers & Scientists
Carbonate Content Data
Project Name: Carteret County Navigation Project
Project Number: EQ18SO47
Date: 4/2412018
Station No.
Sample No.
Depth Range,
Feet
Tare No.
Beaker No.
Dry Sample M.
percent
Carbonate
Before
After
AH-01-0318-Cl
AH-01
0-5.4
301
11
103.03
102.50
0.5
AH-02-0318-C2
AH-02
0-8.7
167
10
48.86
48.27
1.2
AH-03-0318-Cl
AH-03
0-8.6
405
6
60.90
60.60
0.5
AH-04-0318-C2
AH-04
0-7.3
433
1
41.70
41.45
0.6
AH-05-0318-C2
AH-05
0-5.7
131
8
27.63
27.58
0.2
AH-06-0318-C2
AH-06
0-9.8
303
16
102.61
101.77
0.8
AH-07-0318-C2
AH-07
0-8.1
449
40
114.71
114.07
0.6
Tested By: CRM Sr.
Reviewed By: TES
RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY

Terracon
9655 Florida Mining Boulevard West
Jacksonville, Florida 32257
[phone] (Tel) • [phone] (Fax)
VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
GRAIN SIZE AND VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
Project:
t Count
Project No.:
47
rAH-Ol-0318-Cl
Boring No.:
Sample No.:
Depth: 0-5.4
Date: 4/23/2018
Description: I SAND, silty, mostly medium to fine-grained quartz, little silt, trace medium to fine sand -
size shell fragments (SM) 5Y 5/2
Tare Weight, (g): 1 51.67
Dry Wt. Before Washing (g): (with tare)
189.10
Dry Weight After Washing (g): (with tare)
Sieve Size
(Name)
Sieve Size
(mm)
Weight
Retained (g)
o /o Passing
Approx.
Visual Shell
%
Approx. Visual
Shell Wt. (g)
3/4"'
19.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/8"
16.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
7/16
11.112
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/16
7.938
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#3.5
5.600
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#4
4.750
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#5
4.000
0.01
99.99
0
0.00
#7
2.800
0.08
99.93
0
0.00
#10
2,000
0.16
99.82
10
0.02
#14
1.400
0.29
99.61
10
0.03
#18
1.000
0.50
99.24
1
0.01
#25
0.710
1.33
98.28
20
0.27
#35
0.500
2.70
96.31
10
0.27
#45
0.355
4.61
92.96
2
0.09
#60
0.250
7.51
87.49
1
0.08
#80
0.180
35.45
61.70
0
0.00
#120
0.125
56.09
20.88
0
0.00
#170
0.090
6.25
16.34
0
0.00
#200
1 0.075
1.10
15.541
01
0.00
#230 1
0.063
0.651
15.061
01
RECB
Total Shell Content:
1
ED
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY

-
IIIII�■■■Illli�■■■IIIII�■■�iii:��■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■
.,
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII��■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■
IIII1�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■II111�■�l■IIIII�■■■IIII1�■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■�1■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■�I■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■�
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■�■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
..
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■l�IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
. '
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■1■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■:
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■1■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■��IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
.
•
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■�IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■��IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■��IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■�IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
•
•
Ilill�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■tlIIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
II111�■■■II111�■■■II111�■■■I1111�■■�;!�11�■■■11111�■■■
'
II111�■■■II111�■■■II111�■■■IIII1�■■■11111�■■■11111�■■■
II111�■■■II111�■■■II111�■■■II111�■■■II111�■■■II111�■■■
'.
II111�■■■I1111�■■■I1111�■■■II111�■■■II111�■■■I1111�■■■
,
Project Carteret County Navigation Pmject
GRADATION
ENG FORM 2087
MAY 63
The USC classification is based on laboratory grain size distribution and visual classificaton

Project:
Project No.:
Boring No.:
Sample No.:
Description:
RECEIVED
ECEIVED
9655 Florida Mining Boulevard West APR 01 2019
Jacksonville, Florida 32257
[phone] (Tel) • [phone] (Fax) DCM-MHD CITY
VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
GRAIN SIZE AND VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
85047
Depth: 0.5
Date: 6l6/2018
SAND, silty, mostly fine-grained quartz, little silt, trace medium to fine sand -size shell
fragments (SM) 5Y 5l2
Tare Weight, (g
Dry Wt. Before Washing (g):
Dry Weight After Washing (g):
172.83 (with tare)
(with tare)
Sieve Size
(Name)
Sieve Size
(mm)
Weight
Retained (g)
/o Passing
Approx.o
Visual Shell
%
Approx. Visual
Shell Wt. (g)
3/4"
19.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/8"
16.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
7/16
11.112
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/16
7,938
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#3.5
5.600
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#4
4.750
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#5
4.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#7
2.800
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#10
2.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#14
1.400
0.09
99.93
100
0.09
#18
1.000
0.13
99.82
100
0.13
#25
0.710
0.23
99.63
100
0.23
#35
0.500
0.32
99.36
100
0.32
#45
0.355
0.74
98.75
10
0.07
#60
0.250
3.60
95.78
5
0.18
#80
0.180
42.85
60.36
1
0.43
#120
0.125
50.62
18.52
0
0.00
#170
0.090
3.94
15.26
0
0.00
#200
0.075
0.74
14.651
01
0.00
#230
0.063
0.56
14.18
0
0.00
Total Shell Content: 1 1 %

„
IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■�Ill��i�y■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■
.
IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■�1■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■
IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■�1■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■
IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■�I■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■
IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■�I■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■
IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■
IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■�■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■
�'
'
IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■I�IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■
IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■1�11111!■■■IIIII!■■■
-
IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■1�11111!■■■IIIII!■
IIIII!!■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■l�IIIII!■■■IIIII!■
'
IIIII!■■■IIIII!!■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■��IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■
IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■��IIIII!■■■IIIII!■
IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■��IIIII!■■■IIIII!■
IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■��IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■
'
IIIII!■■�lllill!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■
tllll!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■��IIII!■■■IIIII!■■■
'
'
IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■
IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■
.
'
IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■IIIII!■■■
„
Piroject Carteret Coun"avigation Project
®�
M�o���
GRADATION
ENG FORM 2087 RECEIVED
MAY 63
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY
The USC classification is based on laboratory grain size distribution and visual classification

Terracon
RECEIVED
9655 Florida Mining Boulevard West APR 01 2019
Jacksonville, Florida 32257
[phone] (Tel) • [phone] (Fax) DCM-MHD CITY
VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
GRAIN SIZE AND VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
Project:
Project No.:
Boring No.:
rAH-01
Sample No.:
Depth:1 3.0
Date: 6/6/2018
Description: I SAND, silty, mostly fine-grained quartz, little silt, trace medium to fine sand -size shell
fragments (SM) 5Y 4/2
Tare Weight, (g): 50.18
Dry Wt. Before Washing (g): 171.43 (with tare)
Dry Weight After Washing (g): (with tare)
Sieve Size
(Name)
Name
Sieve Size
mm
( )
Weight
Retained (g)
o
�� Passing
Approx.
Visual Shell
%
Approx. Visual
Shell Wt. (g)
3/4"
19.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/8"
16.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
7/16
11.112
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/16
7.938
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#3.5
5.600
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#4
4.750
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#5
4.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#7
2.800
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#10
2.000
0.07
99.94
50
0.04
#14
1.400
0.16
99.81
70
0.11
#18
1.000
0.23
99.62
100
0.23
#25
0.710
0.45
99.25
100
0.45
#35
0.500
0.66
98.71
100
0.66
#45
0.355
1.16
97.75
10
0.12
#60
0.250
3.65
94.74
0
0.00
#80
0.180
22.88
75.87
0
0.00
#120
0.125
56.75
29.06
0
0.00
#170
0.090
9.49
21.24
0
0.00
#200
0.075 1
1.921
19.651
01
0.00
#230
0.063
1.13
18.72
0
0.00
Total Shell Content: 1 1 %

.
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■
Illui�y■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
.
IIIII\■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■�IIIII�■\\■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■
IIIII�■�1■11111�■■■illll�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■�■11111�■■■11111�■■■
,
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■l�IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■1■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■�
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■1■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■��IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■��IIIII�■■■IIIII�■
�'
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII\■�
IIIII�■■■illll�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■��IIIIi�■■■IIIII�■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■��IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■�IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
''
11111�■■■Ilill�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■��IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■t�lllll�■■■11111�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■Iilll�■■��IIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■Il�ill�■■■IIIII�■■■
.
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■
.
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■
„
P,oject Carteret County Na�gation Project
����■■
Boring AH:01
Date 6/612018
GRADATION
ENG FORM 2087 I?ECEIVEr,
MAY 63
APR 01 2019
The USC classification is based on laboratory grain size distribution and visual classification
DCM-MHD CITY

Project:
Project No.:
Boring No.:
Sample No.:
Description:
Terracon
9655 Florida Mining Boulevard West
Jacksonville, Florida 32257
[phone] (Tel) • [phone] (Fax)
VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
GRAIN SIZE AND VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
85047
Depth: 5.0
Date: 6/6/2018
SAND, poorly -graded, mostly medium to fine-grained quartz, trace silt, trace coarse to
fine sand -sized shell fragments (SP) 5Y 6/2
Tare Weight, (g):
Dry Wt. Before Washing (g):
Dry Weight After Washing (g):
l
(with tare)
(with tare)
Sieve Size
Name
(Name)
Sieve Size
mm
( )
Weight
Retained (g)
°
/° Passing
Approx.
Visual Shell
%
Approx. Visual
Shell Wt. (g)
3/4"
19.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/8"
16.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
7/16
11.112
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/16
7.938
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#3.5
5.600
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#4
4.750
0.01
99.99
100
0.01
#5
4.000
0.23
99.82
100
0.23
#7
2.800
0.11
99.74
100
0.11
#10
2.000
0.53
99.34
100
0.53
#14
1.400
1.56
98.18
10
0.16
#18
1.000
3.92
95.24
5
0.20
#25
0.710
8.26
89.07
5
0.41
#35
0.500
14.05
78.56
1
0.14
#45
0.355
17.82
65.23
1
0.18
#60
0.250
18.89
51.11
0
0.00
#80
0.180
32.06
27.13
0
0.00
#120
0.125
30.02
4.68
0
0.00
#170
0.090
1.88
3.28
0
0.00
#200
0.075
0.331
3.031
0
0.00
#230 1
0.063 1
0.181
2.891
0
0.00
I otal shellcontent: 1 1 % I RECEIVED
APR 01 ZU19
DCM-MHD CITY

" IIIII�■■■11111�■■�11111�■■`11111\■■�IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
.
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■1►111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■Iliil�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
�'
'
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII\■■■IIIII�■�■11111�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■11111��■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�\■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
�'
IIIII�■■■illll�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�\1■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
„
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■Iilll�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■�
;
�'
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■11■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■�1■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII��■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■�■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■��IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■l�IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
Illll�i■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■1�11111�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■\�Ilill�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■��IIIII�■■■11111�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■�\_IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
11111�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■��a�l�■■■IIIII�■■■
..ES
E NG FORM 2087 ' The USC classification is based on laboratory grain size distribution and visual classification
MAY 63 RECEIVED
qPR 01 Z019

RECEIVED
Terracon
9655 Florida Mininq Boulevard West
Jacksonville, Florida 32257
[phone] (Tel) - [phone] (Fax)
VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
GRAIN SIZE AND VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY
Project: Carteret County Navigation Project Depth: 0-8.7
Project No.: E0185047 Date: 4/23/2018
Boring No.: AH-02-0318-C2
Sample No.: AH-02
Description:
Sandy elastic silt, some medium to fine-grained quartz sand (MH) 5Y 3/1
Tare Weight, (g): Dry Wt. Before Washing (g):[_=jN0:9?65 (with tare)
Dry Weight After Washing (g): (with tare)
Sieve Size
(Name)
Sieve Size
(mm)
Weight
Retained (g)
o /o Passing
Approx.
Visual Shell
%
Approx. Visual
Shell Wt. (g)
3/4"
19.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/8"
16.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
7/16
11 A 12
0.04
99.96
0
0.00
5/16
7.938
0.11
99.84
0
0.00
#3.5
5.600
0.12
99.72
0
0.00
#4
4.750
0.04
99.68
0
0.00
#5
4.000
0.03
99.65
0
0.00
#7
2.800
0.06
99.59
0
0.00
#10
2.000
0.04
99.54
0
0.00
#14
1.400
0.03
99.51
0
0.00
#18
1.000
0.10
99.41
20
0.02
#25
0.710
0.21
99.19
10
0.02
#35
0,500
0.73
98.44
2
0.01
#45
0.355
2.35
96.01
1
0.02
#60
0.250
5.87
89.94
0
0.00
#80
0.180
12.50
77.01
0
0.00
#120
0.125
18.10
58.29
0
0.00
#170
0.090
3.34
54.84
0
0.00
#200
0.075
1.02
53.78
0
0.00
#230
0.063
0.79
52.96
0
0.00
Total Shell Content: 1 0 %

Jill
" IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIII��■■■Illli.y■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■ '
.
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�\�■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■\1■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■\■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■1�I1111�■■■IIIII�■■■
,
'
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■\�IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
,
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■\�IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
..
'
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■��IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
..
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■�IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
:
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■II��I�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
.
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
��111�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIIi�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■illll�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■11111�■■■_
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIiI�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
....
mmmmoo
Carteret County Navigation Project
mmommmProject
Boring No. AH-02-0318-C2
GRADATION
ENG FORM 2087 rt t 1, t. V ill • The USC classification is based on laboratory grain size distribution and Visual classification
MAY 63
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY

RECEIVED
Terracon
9655 Florida Mininq Boulevard West
Jacksonville, Florida 32257
[phone] (Tel) • [phone] (Fax)
VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
GRAIN SIZE AND VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY
Project: Carteret County Navigation Project Depth: 0.5
Project No.: EQ185047 Date: 6/6/2018
Boring No.: AH-02
Sample No.: S-1
Description: SAND, poorly -graded with silt, mostly medium to fine-grained quartz, few silt, trace
medium to fine sand -size shell fragments (SP-SM) 5Y 4/2
Tare Weight, (g): 1 50.01
Dry Wt. Before Washing (g): 1 166.55 (with tare)
Dry Weight After Washing (g): I (with tare)
Sieve Size
(Name)
Sieve Size
(mm)
Weight
Retained (g)
o /o Passing
Approx.
Visual Shell
o/o
Approx. Visual
Shell Wt. (g)
3/4"
19.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/8"
16.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
7/16
11.112
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/16
7.938
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#3.5
5.600
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#4
4.750
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#5
4.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#7
2.800
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#10
2.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#14
1.400
0.13
99.89
100
0.13
#18
1.000
0.53
99.43
10
0.05
#25
0.710
1.44
98.20
5
0.07
#35
0.500
4.74
94.13
0
0.00
#45
0.355
13.81
82.28
1
0.14
#60
0.250
28.44
57.88
0
0.00
#80
0.180
37.00
26.13
0
0.00
#120
0.125
20.86
8.23
0
0.00
#170
0.090
1.63
6.83
0
0.00
#200
0.075
0.31
6.56
0
0.00
#230 1
0.063 1
0.24
6.361
01
0.00
Total Shell Content: 1 0 %

iiiiiiiiiiji
Illlli■■■Illllf■■■Illlli■■�Iii:1i■■■Illlli■■■Illlli■■
.
11111�■■■Illlli■■■IIIII■■■IIIII\■■■IIIIi�■■■IIIII■■■
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII\■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII��I■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII�II■■IIIII■■■IIIII■
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII\'■■Ilill�■■■IIIII■
IIIII■■■11111�■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■►�■IIIII■■■11111�■
'
IIIII■■■11111�■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■1�■IIIII■■■11111�■■
Illlli■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■\�■11111�■■■IIIII■■■
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■�1■11111�■■■IIIII■■■
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■1■IIIII■■■11111�■■■
,
illll�■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■�I■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■
'
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■11111�■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■Illlli■■■
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■illll�■■■IIIII■■�■IIIII■■■11111�■■
IIIII■■■IIIIi�■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■l�IIIII�■■■IIIII■■■
'
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■11111�■■■IIIII■■\�IIIII�■■■IIIII■■■
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■11111�■■■IIIII■■\�IIIII�■■■IIIII■■■
'
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■��IIIII�■■■IIIII■■■
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■�::!"!li■■■IIIII■■■
'
Illlli■■■IIIII■■■Illlli■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■Illlli■■■
„
��
�mmmmm
Carteret County Navigation Project
®�
mmommmProject
GRADATION
ENG FORM 2087 ' The USC classification is based on laboratory grain size distribution and visual classification
MAY 63 RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY

RECEIVED
Terracon
9655 Florida Mining Boulevard West
Jacksonville, Florida 32257
[phone] (Tel) • [phone] (Fax)
VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
GRAIN SIZE AND VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY
Project: Carteret Coun Navigation Project Depth: 1.5
Project No.: EQ185047 Date: 6/6/2018
Boring No.: AH-02
Sample No.: S-2
Description: SAND, silty, mostly medium to fine-grained quartz, little silt, trace medium to fine sand -
size shell fragments (SM) 5Y 4/1
Tare Weight, (g): 1 51.56
Dry Wt. Before Washing (g): 174.93 (with tare)
Dry Weight After Washing (g): (with tare)
Sieve Size
(Name)
Sieve Size
(mm)
Weight
Retained (g)
o /o Passing
Approx.
Visual Shell
%
Approx. Visual
Shell Wt. (g)
3/4"
19.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/8"
16.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
7/16
11.112
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/16
7.938
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#3.5
5.600
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#4
4.750
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#5
4.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#7
2.800
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#10
2.000
0.13
99.89
100
0.13
#14
1.400
0.28
99.67
100
0.28
#18
1.000
0.12
99.57
100
0.12
#25
0.710
0.25
99.37
100
0.25
#35
0.500
0.59
98.89
10
0.06
#45
0.355
2.72
96.68
1
0.03
#60
0.250
12.51
86.54
1
0.13
#80
0.180
39.66
54.40
0
0.00
#120
0.125
43.24
19.35
0
0.00
#170
0.090
4.88
15.39
0
0.00
#200
0.075
0.44
15.04
0
0.00
#230
1 0.063
0.051
15.00
0
0.00
Total Shell Content: 1 1 %

IIIII�■■■Ilill�■■�11111�■■�Illli�y■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111��
l■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■�1■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■1■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■�I■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■illll�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■�'■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■1�11111�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■�illlll�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■1�11111�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■��IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■�IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■��IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■��IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■��IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■`!1111�■■■IIIII�■■■
-'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
.
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■11111�■■■
��
�mmmmm
Project Carteret County Navigation Project
size shell fragments (SM) 5Y 4/1
Boring hlo�AH-02
GRADATION
ENG FORM 2087 RECEIVED
MAY 63
A°R 01 2019
The USC classification is based on laboratory grain size distribution and visual classification
DCM-MHD CITY

Terracon
9655 Florida Mining Boulevard West
Jacksonville. Florida 32257
RECEIVED
AP R 01 2019
[phone] (Tel) • [phone] (Fax) DCM-MHD CITY
VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
GRAIN SIZE AND VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
Project: Carteret Coun Navigation Project Depth: 7.0
Project No.: EQ185047 Date: 6/6/2018
Boring No.: AH-02
Sample No.: S-3
Description: Elastic silt, trace fine-grained quartz sand (MH) 5Y 2.511
I are vvelgnt, (g): I bI.bti
Dry Wt. Before Washing (g): 1 93.72 (with tare)
Dry Weight After Washing (g): I (with tare)
Sieve Size
(Name)
Sieve Size
(mm)
Weight
Retained (g)
/o Passing
Approx.o
Visual Shell
%
Approx. Visual
Shell Wt. (g)
3/4"
19.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/8"
16.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
7/16
11.112
0.00
100.00
01
0.00
5/16
7.938
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#3.5
5.600
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#4
4.750
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#5
4.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#7
2.800
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#10
2.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#14
1.400
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#18
1.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#25
0.710
0.03
99.93
0
0.00
#35
0.500
0.03
99.86
1
0.00
#45
0.355
0.10
99.62
1
0.00
#60
0.250
0.11
99.36
0
0.00
#80
0.180
0.26
98.74
0
0.00
#120
0.125
0.65
97.20
0
0.00
#170
0.090
0.35
96.37
0
0.00
#200
0.075
0.21
95.871
0
0.00
#230
1 0.063 1
0.22
95.351
0
0.00
Total Shell Content: 1 0 %

IIIII�■■■Illli�■■■11111�■■�IIIII�■r�!!M11�■■■IIIII�■■■
.
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
,
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
,
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
�,
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■Ilill�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
,
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
•
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■illll�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
.
'
Ilill�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
Project Carteret County Navigation Project
GRADATION
ENG FORM 2087 RECEIVED ' The USC classification is based on laboratory grain size distribution and visual classification
MAY 63
APR 01 2019
DCM_MHD CITY

RECEIVED
Terracon
9655 Florida Mining Boulevard West
Jacksonville, Florida 32257
[phone] (Tel) • [phone] (Fax)
VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
GRAIN SIZE AND VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
Project: rAH
teret C
Project No.: 185047
Boring No.: -03-031
Sample No.: -03
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY
Depth: 0-8.6
Date: 4/23/2018
Description: I
SAND, silty, mostly medium to fine-grained quartz, some silt, trace medium to fine
size shell fragments (SM) 5Y 3/1
Tare Weight, (g): 1 50.18
Dry Wt. Before Washing (g): (with tare)
144.06
Dry Weight After Washing (g): P(with tare)
Sieve Size
(Name)
Sieve Size
(mm)
Weight
Retained (g)
o /o Passing
Approx.
Visual Shell
%
Approx. Visual
Shell Wt. (g)
3/4"
19.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/8"
16.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
7/16
11.112
0.00
100.00
01
0.00
5/16
7,938
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#3.5
5.600
0.04
99.96
0
0.00
#4
4.750
0.02
99.94
0
0.00
#5
4.000
0.01
99.93
0
0.00
#7
2.800
0.06
99.86
10
0.01
#10
2.000
0.01
99.85
0
0.00
#14
1.400
0.16
99.68
40
0.06
#18
1.000
0.42
99.23
10
0.04
#25
0.710
1.61
97.52
30
0.48
#35
0.500
4.70
92.51
5
0.24
#45
0.355
11.75
80.00
0
0.00
#60
0.250
19.40
59.33
0
0.00
#80
0.180
14.72
43.65
0
0.00
#120
0.125
5.80
37.47
0
0.00
#170
0.090
0.74
36.69
0
0.00
#200
0.075
0.20
36.471
0
0.00
#230
0.063 1
0.181
36.281
0
0.00
Total Shell Content: 1 1 %

• • IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■�Ili�l�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■111111
■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■
■
'
1
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�I
■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�\■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
1
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■��■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■1\■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
..
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■li■11111�■■■11111�■■■
:
�'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■\1■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■�
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■�IIIII�■■■Ilill�■■
.
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■1����il�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■i...YYIt■■■IIIII�■■■
.1
11111�■■■IIII■■■■III11�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
1
illll�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIII■■■■ill
��■■■IIIII�■■
:1
1
II111�■■■II111�■■■III11�■■■11111�■■■11111�■■■I1111�■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■
,
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■
• • 1 1Date
4/23/2018
ENG FORM 2087
MAY 63
APR 01 2019
' The USC classification is based on laboratory grain size distribution and visual classification
DCM-MHD CITY

Terracon
9655 Florida Mining Boulevard West
Jacksonville, Florida 32257
[phone] (Tel) • [phone] (Fax)
VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
GRAIN SIZE AND VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY
Project: Carteret Coun Navigation Project Depth: 0.5
Project No.: EQ185047 Date: 6/6/2018
Boring No.: AH-03
Sample No.: S-1
Description: Elastic silt with sand, little fine-grained quartz (MH) 5Y 2.511
I are vvelgnt, tc
Dry Wt. Before Washing (g)
Dry Weight After Washing (g):
107.32 (with tare)
(with tare)
Sieve Size
(Name)
Sieve Size
(mm)
Weight
Retained (g)
o /o Passing
Approx.
Visual Shell
%
Approx. Visual
Shell Wt. (g)
3/4"
19.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/8"
16.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
7/16
11.112
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/16
7.938
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#3.5
5.600
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#4
4.750
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#5
4.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#7
2.800
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#10
2.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#14
1.400
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#18
1.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#25
0.710
0.11
99.80
0
0.00
#35
0.500
0.26
99.34
0
0.00
#45
0.355
0.82
97.86
0
0.00
#60
0.250
1.39
95.37
0
0.00
#80
0.180
1.71
92.30
0
0.00
#120
0.125
1.72
89.21
0
0.00
#170
0.090
0.37
88.55
0
0.00
#200
0.075
0.27
88.071
01
0.00
#230
0.063
0.381
87.381
01
0.00
Total Shell Content: 1 0 %

. IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■�11111�■■�IIII���■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
.
11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■\�IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
illll�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIIi�■■`��r�l�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
,
11111�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■
,
Iilll�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■illll�■■■
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIIIt■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■
�'
"
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
�'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
.,
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIIi�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■illll�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■II111�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■
.,
111111■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
„
Project Carteret County Navigation Project
®�
Boring No. AH-03
GRADATION
ENG FORM 2087 RECEIVED
MAY 63
APR 01 2019
The USC classification is based on laboratory grain size distribution and visual classification
DCM-MHD CITY

RECEIVED
Terracon
9655 Florida Mininq Boulevard West
Jacksonville, Florida 32257
[phone] (Tel) - [phone] (Fax)
VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY
GRAIN SIZE AND VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
Project: Carteret County Navigation Project Depth: 3.0
Project No.: EQ185047 Date: 6/6/2018
Boring No.: AH-03
Sample No.: S-2
Description: SAND, poorly -graded with silt, mostly medium to fine-grained quartz, few silt, trace
medium to fine sand -size shell fragments (SP-SM) 5Y 5/2
Tare Weight, (g): 1 49,76
Dry Wt. Before Washing (g) I 176.02 (with tare)
Dry Weight After Washing (g): I I (with tare)
Sieve Size
(Name)
Sieve Size
(mm )
Weight
Retained (g)
% Passing
Approx.Approx.
Visual Shell
%
Visual
Shell Wt. (g)
3/4"
19.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/8"
16.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
7/16
11.112
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/16
7.938
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#3.5
5.600
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#4
4.750
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#5
4.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#7
2.800
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#10
2.000
0.07
99.95
100
0.07
#14
1.400
0.36
99.66
100
0.36
#18
1.000
0.68
99.12
10
0.07
#25
0.710
1.90
97.62
1
0.02
#35
0.500
6.91
92.15
1
0.07
#45
0.355
22.99
73.94
0
0.00
#60
0.250
36.80
44.79
0
0.00
#80
0.180
26.45
23.84
0
0.00
#120
0.125
15.29
11.73
0
0.00
#170
0.090
1.34
10.67
0
0.00
#200
0.075
0.281
10.451
0
0.00
#230
0.063
0.271
10.241
01
0.00
Total Shell Content: 1 0

"
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■�IIIII�■■�Iii�1�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
.
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIIIII■■■IIIII�■■■IIIIIO■■
,
'
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII\■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■
IIIII�■■■Ilill�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�►\■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■Illll�ii■■IIIII�■■■IIIIINN
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII��I■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII��'■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■�■11111�■■■IIIII�■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■It■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■1�■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■��■11111�■■■IIIII�■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■�1■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■
.
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIIi�■■►�IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■l�lllll�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■\�IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
.
'
'
IIIII�■■illlll�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■�!1�11�■■■11111�■■■
11111�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
.
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
Project Carteret County Navigation Project
®a
(SP-SM) 5Y 5/2
Boring No. AH-03
GRADATIONfragments
CURVES
ENG FORM 2087 w�w"l v c1J
MAY 67
APR 01 2019
The USC classification is based on laboratory grain size distribution and visual classification
DCM-MHD CITY

RECEIVED
Terracon
9655 Florida Mininq Boulevard West
Jacksonville, Florida 32257
[phone] (Tel) - [phone] (Fax)
VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
GRAIN SIZE AND VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY
Project: Carteret County Navigation Project Depth: 7.5
Project No.: EQ185047 Date: 6/6/2018
Boring No.: AH-03
Sample No.: S-3
Description: SAND, poorly -graded, mostly medium to fine-grained quartz, trace silt, trace medium to
fine sand -size shell fragments (SP) 5Y 7/1
Tare Weight, (g) 51.50
Dry Wt. Before Washing (g): (with tare)
Pq(withtare)
Dry Weight After Washing (g):
Sieve Size
(Name)
Sieve Size
(mm)
Weight
Retained (g)
o /o Passing
Approx.
Visual Shell
%
Approx. Visual
Shell Wt. (g)
3/4"
19.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/81,
16.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
7/16
11.112
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/16
7.938
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#3.5
5.600
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#4
4.750
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#5
4.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#7
2.800
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#10
2.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#14
1,400
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#18
1.000
0.32
99.76
5
0.02
#25
0.710
1.45
98.66
5
0.07
#35
0.500
5.95
94.14
1
0.06
#45
0.355
21.48
77.84
1
0.21
#60
0.250
52.22
38.20
0
0.00
#80
0.180
41.39
6.79
0
0.00
#120
0.125
6.64
1.75
0
0.00
#170
0.090
0.24
1.56
0
0.00
#200
0.075
0.071
1.51
0
0.00
#230
0.063
0.021
1.501
0
0.00
Total Shell Content: 1 0 %

IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■�11111�■■■IIu1�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
.
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■Illlli■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■illll�■■■1111111■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111��■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
•'
,
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■Illll�li■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�11■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII��I■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
,
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII��'■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
•
.,
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■�■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■It■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
'
'
IIIIIo■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■illll�■It■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■
■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■�1■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■�1■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■�I■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■�
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■i■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIII;■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■�
�IIA�
Carteret County Navigation Project
GRADATIONProject
ENG FORM 2087 rr ' The USC classification is based on laboratory grain size distribution and visual classification
MAY 63 RECEIVEa-
JVJ 1 p 1 -W9
DCM-MHD CITY

RECEIVED
Terracon APR 01 2019
9655 Florida Mining Boulevard West
Jacksonville, Florida 32257 DCM-MHD CITY
[phone] (Tel) • [phone] (Fax)
VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
GRAIN SIZE AND VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
Project: rAH-04
t Count
Project No.: 47
Boring No.: 318-C2
Sample No.:
Depth: 0-7.3
Date:4/23/2018
Description: I Sandy elastic silt, some medium to fine-grained quartz sand (MH) 5Y 2.511
Tare Weight, (g): 1 51.76
Dry Wt. Before Washing (g): 134.60 (with tare)
Dry Weight After Washing (g): (with tare)
Sieve Size
(Name)
Sieve Size
(mm)
Weight
Retained (g)
o /o Passing
Approx.
Visual Shell
%
Approx. Visual
Shell Wt. (g)
3/4"
19.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/8"
16.000
0.36
99.57
0
0.00
7/16
11.112
0.00
99.57
01
0.00
5/16
7.938
0.04
99.52
0
0.00
#3.5
5.600
0.01
99.51
0
0.00
#4
4.750
0.00
99.51
0
0.00
#5
4.000
0.07
99.42
0
0.00
#7
2.800
0.01
99.41
0
0.00
#10
2.000
0.02
99.38
0
0.00
#14
1.400
0.10
99.26
0
0.00
#18
1.000
0.22
99.00
0
0.00
#25
0.710
0.52
98.37
1
0.01
#35
0.500
1.55
96.50
1
0.02
#45
0.355
3.73
92.00
0
0.00
#60
0.250
5.67
85.15
0
0.00
#80
0.180
8.69
74.66
0
0.00
#120
0.125
16.03
55.31
0
0.00
#170
0.090
3.43
51.17
0
0.00
#200
0.075
0.45
50.63
0
0.00
#230
0.063
0.29
50.28
0
0.00
Total Shell Content: 1 0 %

.
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■II■�IIII�■■riiii:�r��lllll�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�7■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�\\■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■\\■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■�11111�■■■IIIII�■■■
,
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■1�11111�■■■11111�■■■
.
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■\�IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■\�IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
..
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■�\IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
�' ,
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■�!!��I�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
.
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
•
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■III11�■■■IIIII�■■■IIII1�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■11111�■■■
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
"
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
• •
�mmmmm
mmommmProject
Date 4/23/2018
GRADATION
ENG FORM 2087 " the USG classification is based on laboratory grain size distribution and
MAY 63 RECEIVED
APR 01 2019

RECEIVED
Project:
Project No.:
Boring No.:
Sample No.:
Description:
Terracon
9655 Florida Mining Boulevard West
Jacksonville, Florida 32257
[phone] (Tel) • [phone] (Fax)
VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
GRAIN SIZE AND VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
Cou
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY
Depth: 0.5
Date: 6/6/2018
Elastic silt, few medium to fine-grained quartz sand (MH) 5Y 2.511
Tare Weight, (g):
Dry Wt. Before Washing (g):
Dry Weight After Washing (g):
ith tare)
ith tare)
Sieve Size
(Name)
Sieve Size
(mm)
Weight
Retained (g)
/o Passing
Approx.0
Visual Shell
%
Approx. Visual
Shell Wt. (g)
3/4"
19.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/8"
16.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
7/16
11.112
0.00
100.00
Ol
0.00
5/16
7.938
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#3.5
5.600
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#4
4.750
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#5
4.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#7
2.800
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#10
2.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#14
1.400
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#18
1.000
0.01
99.98
0
0.00
#25
0.710
0.01
99.96
0
0.00
#35
0.500
0.19
99.53
0
0.00
#45
0.355
0.52
98.36
0
0.00
#60
0.250
1.27
95.51
0
0.00
#80
0.180
1.50
92.15
0
0.00
#120
0.125
1.17
89.53
0
0.00
#170
0.090
0.25
88.97
0
0.00
#200
0.075
0.14
88.65
0
0.00
#230
0.063
0.14
88.34
0
0.00
Total Shell Content: 0 %

.
II111�■■rlllll�■■�11111�■■�IIIIIi�y�lllll�■■■11111�■v
.
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■Ilill�■■■IIIII�■\711111�■■■IIIII�■�
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■`ii��l�■■■IIIII�■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIiI�■■illlll�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■�
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■�
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■A
'
IIIII�■■iIIIII�■■■IIIII�■■illlll�■■■IIIII�■■�IIIII�■®
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■A
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■�IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■�
IIIII�■■�IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■�IIIII�■■illlll�■■i
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■�IIIII�■■■11111�■i■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■i
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■i■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■III
III■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIIi�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIIl�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■i
.
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■illlll�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
Carteret County Navigation Project
Elastic silt, few medium to fine-grained
���MIMM'projw
GRADATION
ENG FORM 2087 RECEIVED ' The USC classification is based on laboratory grain size distribution and visual classification
MAY 63
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY

Project:
Project No.:
Boring No.:
Sample No.:
Description:
RECEIVED
Terracon
9655 Florida Mining Boulevard West APR 01 2019
Jacksonville Florida 32257
[phone] (Tel) - [phone] (Fax) DCM-MHD CITY
VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
GRAIN SIZE AND VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
Carteret C
EQ185047
AH-04
S-2
Depth: 3.0
Date: 6/6/2018
Elastic silt with sand, little medium to fine-grained quartz sand (MH) 5Y 2.5/1
Dry Wt. Before Washing (g): I 100.79 (with tare)
Dry Weight After Washing (g): (with tare)
Sieve Size
(Name)
Sieve Size
(mm)
Weight
Retained (g)
o /o Passing
Approx.
Visual Shell
%
Approx. Visual
Shell Wt. (g)
3/4"
19.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/8"
16.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
7/16
11.112
0.00
100.00
01
0.00
5/16
7.938
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#3.5
5.600
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#4
4.750
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#5
4.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#7
2.800
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#10
2.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#14
1.400
0.01
99.98
0
0.00
#18
1.000
0.01
99.96
50
0.01
#25
0.710
0.05
99.86
50
0.03
#35
0.500
0.35
99.17
0
0.00
#45
0.355
1.30
96.60
1
0.01
#60
0.250
2.29
92.07
0
0.00
#80
0.180
2.88
86.38
0
0.00
#120
0.125
2.86
80.72
0
0.00
#170
0.090
0.58
79.58
0
0.00
#200
1 0.075
1 0.331
78.92
0
0.00
#230
1 0.063 1
0.221
78.49
0
0.00
Total Shell Content: 1 0 %

•
IIIII�■■■IIi11�■■�IIIII�■■�IIIII�y■�IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
. •
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■11111�■7■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■11111�■�711111�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■t\IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■Il�ill�■■■IIIII�■■■
,
•
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII!■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■Illlli■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■Iilll�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
�' ,
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
,
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
,
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■11111�■■■
-'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■illll�■■■11111�■■■11111�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
.
'
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
��
�mmmmm
Project Carteret County Navi ation Project
ENG FORM 2087 I�Ef E1 V .D
MAY 63
APR 0 1 2019
The U C classification is based on laboratory grain size distribution and visual classification
DCM-MHD CITY

Project:
Project No.:
Boring No.:
Sample No.:
Description:
RECEIVED
Terracon
9655 Florida Mining Boulevard West APR 0 1 2019
Jacksonville, Florida 32257
[phone] (Tel) • [phone] (Fax) DCM-MHD CITY
VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
GRAIN SIZE AND VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
EQ185047
S-3
Depth:1 6.0
Date: 6/6/2018
SAND, poorly -graded, mostly medium to fine-grained quartz, trace silt (SP) 5Y 714
Tare Weight, (g):
Dry Wt. Before Washing (g):
Dry Weight After Washing (g):
52.30
164.40 (with tare)
(with tare)
Sieve Size
(Name)
Sieve Size
(mm)
Weight
Retained (g)
o /o Passing
Approx.
Visual Shell
%
Approx. Visual
Shell Wt. (g)
3/4"
19.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/8"
16.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
7/16
11.112
0.00
100.00
01
0.00
5/16
7.938
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#3.5
5.600
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#4
4.750
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#5
4.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#7
2.800
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#10
2.000
0.13
99.88
0
0.00
#14
1.400
0.31
99.61
0
0.00
#18
1.000
0.36
99.29
0
0.00
#25
0.710
0.31
99.01
0
0.00
#35
0.500
0.44
98.62
0
0.00
#45
0.355
1.05
97.68
0
0.00
#60
0.250
8.07
90.48
0
0.00
#80
0.180
36.53
57.89
0
0.00
#120
0.125
57.69
6.43
0
0.00
#170
0.090
6.20
0.90
0
0.00
#200
0.075
0.50
0.45
0
0.00
#230
0.063
0.12
0.35
0
0.00
Total Shell Content: 1 0 %

Illlle■■■Illlle■■■lllll�r■�Iliiii�!■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■■
.
Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■1■Illlle■■■Illlle■■■
Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■��■Illlle■■■Illlle■■■
'
Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■�1■Illlle■■■Illlle■■■
IIIIIe■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■�I■Illlle■■■Illlle■■■
'
Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■��■Illlle■■■Illlle■■■
Illlle■■■Illlle■■■IIIIIe■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■■
'
Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■I�Illlle■■■Illlle■■■
Illlle■■■IIIIIe■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■I�Illlle■■■Illlle■■■
'
�
'
Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■1■Illlle■■■Illlle■■■
Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■I�Illlle■■■Illlle■■■
'
.Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■e�llllle■■■Illlle■■■
.
Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■��Illlle■■■Illlle■■■
..
'
Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■■
Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■��Illlle■■■Illlle■■■
'
'
Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■��Illlle■■■Illlle■■■
Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■�■Illlle■■■Illlle■■■
'
Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■■
Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■!!Illlle■■■Illlle■■■
'.
Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■■Illlle■■��1_��le■■■Illlle■■■
Project Carteret County Navigation Pro
_ject
GRADATION
ENG FORM 2087 " The USQ classification is based on laboratory grain size distribution and visual classification
MAY 63 RECEIVED
APR 0 1 2019
DCM-MHD CITY

Terracon
RECEIVED
9655 Florida Mining Boulevard West APR p 1 2019
Jacksonville, Florida 32257
[phone] (Tel) • [phone] (Fax) r1TY
VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
GRAIN SIZE AND VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
Project: Carteret Coun Navigation Project Depth: 0-5.7
Project No.: EQ185047 Date: 4/23/2018
Boring No.: AH-05-0318-C2
Sample No.: AH-05
Description: SAND, silty, mostly medium to fine-grained quartz, some silt, trace fine gravel -size
fragments (SM) 5Y 2.5/1
Tare Weight, (g): 1 49.77
Dry Wt. Before Washing (g): (with tare)
97.35
Dry Weight After Washing (g): (with tare)
Sieve Size
(Name)
Sieve Size
(mm)
Weight
Retained (g)
/o Passing
Approx.o
Visual Shell
%
Approx. Visual
Shell Wt. (g)
3/4"
19.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/8"
16.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
7/16
11.112
0.22
99.54
01
0.00
5/16
7.938
0.12
99.29
0
0.00
#3.5
5.600
0.11
99.05
0
0.00
#4
4.750
0.01
99.03
0
0.00
#5
4.000
0.10
98.82
0
0.00
#7
2.800
0.02
98.78
0
0.00
#10
2.000
0.20
98.36
0
0.00
#14
1.400
0.09
98.17
0
0.00
#18
1.000
0.14
97.88
0
0.00
#25
0.710
0.20
97.46
0
0.00
#35
0.500
0.61
96.17
1
0.01
#45
0.355
1.03
94.01
0
0.00
#60
0.250
2.43
88.90
0
0.00
#80
0.180
6.86
74.49
0
0.00
#120
0.125
10.77
51.85
0
0.00
#170
0.090
1.76
48.15
0
0.00
#200
0.075
1 0.361
47.39
0
0.00
#230
1 0.063
1 0.251
46.87
0
0.00
Total Shell Content: 1 0 %

iiiiijillillillillillillillillillililI
IIIII�■■rlllll�■■�IIIIIIr■�ii
i�
:!11■■�IIIII�■■�IIIII�■■■
.
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�\\■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■\1■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
,
11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■\1�11111�■■■IIIII�■■■
,
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■�11111�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■1�11111�■■■IIIII�■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■��IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■
IIIII�■■�IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■\�IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■�\IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■illll�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■e\IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■Ilill�■■■Iilll�■■�urrl�■■■IIIII�■■■
.
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■Iilll�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■!■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■Illil�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■�IIIII�■■■
��
mmmmmm
Carteret County Navigation Project
��
mmommmProject
GRADATION
ENG FORM 2087 RECEIVED ' The USG classification is based on laboratory grain size distribution and visual classification
MAY 87
APR 01 2019
()CM-MHD CITY

Terracon
9655 Florida Mining Boulevard West
Jacksonville, Florida 32257
RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
[phone] (Tel) • [phone] (Fax) DCM-MHD CITY
VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
GRAIN SIZE AND VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
Project: Carteret Coun Navigation Project Depth: 0.5
Project No.: E0185047 Date: 6/6/2018
Boring No.: AH-05
Sample No.: S-1
Description: Elastic slit, trace fine-grained quartz sand (MH) 5Y 3l1
Tare Weight, (g): 1 49.27
Dry Wt. Before Washing (g): 75.17 (with tare)
Dry Weight After Washing (g): (with tare)
Sieve Size
(Name)
Sieve Size
(mm)
Weight
Retained (g)
/o Passing
Approx.o
Visual Shell
%
Approx. Visual
Shell Wt. (g)
3/4"
19.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/8"
16.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
7/16
11.112
0.00
100.00
01
0.00
5/16
7.938
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#3.5
5.600
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#4
4.750
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#5
4.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#7
2.800
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#10
2.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#14
1.400
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#18
1.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#25
0.710
0.01
99.96
0
0.00
#35
0.500
0.01
99.92
0
0.00
#45
0.355
0.08
99.61
0
0.00
#60
0.250
0.12
99.15
0
0.00
#80
0,180
0.19
98.42
0
0.00
#120
0.125
0.22
97.57
0
0.00
#170
0.090
0.12
97.10
0
0.00
#200
0.075
0.051
96.911
0
0.00
#230 1
0.063 1
0.141
96.371
0
0.00
Total Shell Content: 1 0 %

III11�■■■Illli�■■�11111�■■■IIIII��r�::�!1�■■■I1111�■■■
'
.
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
,
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
,
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
�
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
�' ,
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
,
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■
11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■
.
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■
„
��
�mmmmm
t Carteret County Navigation Project
®�
mmommmProje
No. AH-05
GRADATION
ENG FORM 2087
MAY 63
APR 0 1 2019
The USC classification is based on laboratory grain size distribution and
DCM-MHD CITY

RECEIVED
Terracon
9655 Florida Mining Boulevard West
Jacksonville, Florida 32257
[phone] (Tel) • [phone] (Fax)
VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
GRAIN SIZE AND VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY
Project: Carteret County Navigation Project Depth: 5.0
Project No.: EQ185047 Date: 6/6/2018
Boring No.: AH-05
Sample No.: S-2
Description:
SAND, poorly -graded, mostly medium to fine-grained quartz, trace silt (SP) SY 5/1
Tare Weight, (g) 1 51.07
Dry Wt. Before Washing (g): (with tare)
Dry Weight After Washing (g): 173.13 (with tare)
Sieve Size
(Name)
Sieve Size
(mm)
Weight
Retained (g)
°
�° Passing
Approx.
Visual Shell
Approx. Visual
Shell Wt. (g)
3/4"
19.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/8"
16.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
7/16
11.112
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/16
7.938
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#3.5
5.600
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#4
4.750
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#5
4.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#7
2.800
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#10
2.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#14
1.400
0.29
99.76
0
0.00
#18
1.000
0.26
99.55
0
0.00
#25
0.710
0.93
98.79
0
0.00
#35
0.500
0.40
98.46
0
0.00
#45
0.355
2.06
96.77
0
0.00
#60
0.250
8.47
89.83
0
0.00
#80
0.180
44.97
52.99
0
0.00
#120
0.125
53.78
8.93
0
0.00
#170
0.090
6.90
3.28
0
0.00
#200
0.075
1.16
2.33
0
0.00
#230
0.063
0.64
1.80
0
0.00
I otal Shell Content: 1 0 %

Illlli■■rllllli■■�Illlli■■�IiiiGiy■■Illlli■■■Illlli■
.
Illlli■■■Illlli■■■Illlli■■■Illlli\\■Illlli■■■Illlli■�
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■��■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■�1■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■I■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
,
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■�I■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■�■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
,
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■�IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■I■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■i■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■I�IIIIIi■■■IIIII�■■■
'
Illlli■■■Illlli■■■Illlli■■■Illlli■■i�llllli■■■Illlli■■■
11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■��IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
,
11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■��IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■��IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■��11111�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■�11111�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■��IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■LIIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
.
'
IIIIi�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■1��!1�■■■illll�■■■
,,
��
�mmmmm
Carteret County NaAgaton Project
®a
..a...Project
No. AH-05
GRADATION-CURVESBoring
ENG FORM 2087 RECEIVED
MAY 63
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITy
The USC classification is based on laboratory grain size distribution and

RECEIVED
APk 01 ZU19
Terracon DCM-MHD CITY
9655 Florida Mining Boulevard West
Jacksonville, Florida 32257
[phone] (Tel) • [phone] (Fax)
VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
GRAIN SIZE AND VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
Project: rAH-06
t C
Project No.: 47
Boring No.: 31
Sample No.:
Depth: 0-9.8
Date:4/23/2018
Description: I
SAND, poorly -graded with silt, mostly medium to fine-grained quartz, few silt, trace fine
sand -size shell fragments (SP-SM) 5Y 5/2
Tare Weight, (g): 1 49.83
Dry Wt. Before Washing (g): 179.33 (with tare)
Dry Weight After Washing (g): (with tare)
Sieve Size
Name
(Name)
Sieve Size
mm
( )
Weight
Retained (g)
o
�� Passing
Approx.
Visual Shell
%
Approx. Visual
Shell Wt. (g)
3/4"
19.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/8"
16.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
7/16
11.112
0.00
100.00
01
0.00
5/16
7.938
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#3.5
5.600
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#4
4.750
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#5
4.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#7
2.800
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#10
2.000
0.30
99.77
30
0.09
#14
1.400
0.56
99.34
10
0.06
#18
1.000
0.97
98.59
10
0.10
#25
0.710
1.82
97.18
15
0.27
#35
0.500
3.23
94.69
10
0.32
#45
0.355
6.87
89.38
1
0.07
#60
0.250
12.34
79.85
0
0.00
#80
0.180
27.54
58.59
0
0.00
#120
0.125
57.84
13.92
0
0.00
#170
0.090
8.62
7.27
0
0.00
#200
0.675
0.541
6.851
0
0.00
#230
0.063 1
0.211
6.691
0
0.00
Total Shell Content: 1 1 %

. •
IIIII1■■■IIIII■■■11111�■■�iiC�l�■■■IIIII♦■■■IIIII■■■
.
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII►�■■11111�■■■IIIII■■■
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII\■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■
.
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■�■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■
illll�■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■��■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■��■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■
IIIII■■■11111�■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■�■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■
,.
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■►�IIIII�■■■IIIII■■■
'
IIIII■■■11111�■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■iilllll�■■■IIIII■■■
�'
,
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■1■IIIII■■■IIIII■
IIIII■■■11111�■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■1■IIIII■■■IIIII■�
.
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■��IIIII�■■■IIIII■■■
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■�IIIII�■■■IIIII■■■
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■��IIIII�■■■11111�■■■
IIIII■■■Illli�■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■��IIIII�■■■IIIII■■■
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■�IIIII�■■■IIIII■■■
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■11111�■■■IIIII■■��11111�■■■IIIII■■■
'
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■Lil��ll�■■■IIIII■■■
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■�.rl�■■■IIIII■■■
.
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■11111�■■■IIIII■■■
prject Carteret County Navigation Project
SAND, poorly -graded with silt, mostly
medium to fine-grained quartz, few silt
GRADATION
ENG FORM 2087 �iEUHVEU
MAY 63
APR 01 2019
The USG classification is based on laboratory grain size distribution and visual classification
DCM-MHD CITY

Terracon
9655 Florida Mininq Boulevard West
Jacksonville, Florida 32257
[phone] (Tel) - [phone] (Fax)
VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY
GRAIN SIZE AND VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
Project: Carteret County Navigation Project Depth: 0.5
Project No.: EQ185047 Date: 6/6/2018
Boring No.: AH-06
Sample No.: S-1
Description: SAND, silty, mostly medium to fine-grained quartz, little silt, trace medium to fine sand
size shell fragments (SM) 5Y 511
Tare Weight, (g) 1 50.27
Dry Wt. Before Washing (g): I 177.13 (with tare)
Dry Weight After Washing (g): I 1(with tare)
Sieve Size
(Name)
Sieve Size
(mm)
Weight
Retained (g)
Passing
Approx.Approx.
Visual Shell%
Visual
Shell Wt. (g)
3/4"
19.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/8"
16:000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
7/16
11.112
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/16
7.938
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#3.5
5.600
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#4
4.750
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#5
4.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#7
2.800
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#10
2.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#14
1.400
0.23
99.82
100
0.23
#18
1.000
0.53
99.40
0
0.00
#25
0.710
1.90
97.90
1
0.02
#35
0.500
3.72
94.97
1
0.04
#45
0.355
7.17
89.32
1
0.07
#60
0.250
17.66
75.40
0
0.00
#80
0.180
30.61
51.27
0
0.00
#120
0.125
27.59
29.52
0
0.00
#170
0.090
3.96
26.40
0
0.00
#200
0.075
1.66
25.09
0
0.00
#230
0.063
1,371
24.011
0
0.00
Total Shell Content: 1 0 %

IIIII�■■■11111�■■�11111�■■�Iliilr■■■II1111■■■111111■■■
. •
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII►`�■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■Illll�li■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�\�■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■1\■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■��■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■\I■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■��■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
,
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■l�IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■1�11111�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■\�IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■\�IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■�\IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■i`:!111�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■III�I�■■■IIIII�■■■
11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
-'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII��■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■®IIIII�■■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
��
mmmmmm
®�
mmmmmm
Boring No. AH-06
Date 616/2018
GRADATION
ENG FORM 2087
MAY 63 RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
. The USC classification is based on laboratory grain size distribution and visual classification
DCM-MHD CITY

RECEIVED
Project:
Project No.:
Boring No.:
Sample No.:
Description:
Terracon
9655 Florida Mining Boulevard West AFH 01 Z019
Jacksonville, Florida 32257
[phone] (Tel) • [phone] (Fax) DCM-MHD CITY
VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
GRAIN SIZE AND VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
85047
Depth: 5.0
Date: 6/6/2018
SAND, poorly -graded, mostly medium to fine-grained quartz, trace silt, trace coarse to
fine sand -size shell fragments (SP) 5Y 7l2
Tare Weight, (g): 51.21
Dry Wt. Before Washing (g): 182.28
Dry Weight After Washing (g):
(with tare)
(with tare)
Sieve Size
(Name)
Sieve Size
(mm)
Weight
Retained (g)
° /° Passing
Approx.
Visual Shell
%
Approx. Visual
Shell Wt. (g)
3/4"
19.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/8"
16.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
7/16
11.112
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/16
7.938
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#3.5
5.600
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#4
4.750
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#5
4.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#7
2.800
0.29
99.78
50
0.15
#10
2.000
0.11
99.69
100
0.11
#14
1.400
0.18
99.56
100
0.18
#18
1.000
0.22
99.39
100
0.22
#25
0.710
0.18
99.25
0
0.00
#35
0.500
0.20
99.10
0
0.00
#45
0.355
0.33
98.85
0
0.00
#60
0.250
1.64
97.60
0
0.00
#80
0.180
17.35
84.36
0
0.00
#120
0.125
92.41
13.86
0
0.00
#170
0.090
15.35
2.14
0
0.00
#200
0.075
0.531
1.741
0
0.06
#230
0.063
0.13
1.64
0
0.00
Total Shell Content: 1 0

•
IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■�■■iunn�:11■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■\1■Illli�■■■IIIII■■■■
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■�IIIII�■■■IIIII■■■■
'
•
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■i■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■1■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■
'
IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■1■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■■
IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■1■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■■
,
IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■■
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■11111�■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■■11111�■■■
�'
'
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■■IIIII■■■■11111�■■■
'
IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■■
IIIII■■■11111�■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■
IIIII■■■11111�■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■
IIIII■■■■Ilill�■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■■
IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■
'
'
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■
IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■
'
'
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■tilllll■■■■Iilll�■■■
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■11111�■■■IIIII■■■
.
'
IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■1:"�1■■■■11111�■■■
„
GRADATION
ENG FORM 2087 oCEIVED
MAY 63
APR 01 2019
The USC classification is based on laboratory grain size distribution and visual classification
DCM-MHD CITY

RECEIVED
Terracon
9655 Florida Mining Boulevard West
Jacksonville, Florida 32257
[phone] (Tel) • [phone] (Fax)
VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
ANH 01 Z019
DCM-MHD CITY
GRAIN SIZE AND VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
Project: Carteret Coun Navigation Project Depth: 9.0
Project No.: EQ185047 Date: 6/6/2018
Boring No.: AH-06
Sample No.: S-3
Description: SAND, poorly -graded, mostly medium to fine-grained quartz, trace silt (SP) 2.5Y 6l8
Tare Weight, (g): 1 51.75
Dry Wt. Before Washing (g): (with tare)
P��I(with
Dry Weight After Washing (g): tare)
Sieve Size
(Name)
Sieve Size
(mm
Weight
g
Retained (g)
o
�� Passing
Approx.
Visual Shell
%
Approx. Visual
Shell Wt. (g)
3/4"
19.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/8"
16.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
7/16
11.112
0.00
100.00
01
0.00
5/16
7.938
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#3.5
5.600
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#4
4.750
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#5
4.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#7
2.800
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#10
2.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#14
1.400
0.17
99.88
0
0.00
#18
1.000
1.19
99.03
0
0.00
#25
0.710
4.14
96.08
0
0.00
#35
0.500
10.35
88.70
0
0.00
#45
0.355
25.05
70.85
0
0.00
#60
0.250
30.63
49.01
0
0.00
#80
0.180
32.10
26.13
0
0.00
#120
0.125
28.45
5.85
0
0.00
#170
0.090
3.27
3.52
0
0.00
#200
0.075
0.301
3.311
0
0.00
#230
0.063
0.151
3.201
0
0.00
I otal Shen Content: 1 0 %

IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■�Illlli■■�iC�l1�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
.
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII\■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■1111111■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII\\■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�l�■■11111�■■■11111�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�11■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■
,
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�\■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
"
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■►�■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
_
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■1\■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■ii■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■�1■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■Ilill�■■■IIIII�■��■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
'
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■�IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■l�IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■1�11111�■■■11111�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■\�IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
.
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■��IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■L\IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
.
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■�li��l�■■■IIIII�■■■
Pmjact
rained uartz, II sill Sp 2.5Y 61
Baring No. AH-06
GRADATIONfine
ENG FORM 2087 The USC classification is based on laboratorygrain size distribution and visual classification
MAY 63 RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY

RECEIVED
a
Terracon
9655 Florida Mining Boulevard West APR 0 1 2019
Jacksonville, Florida 32257
[phone] (Tel) • [phone] (Fax) DCM-MHD CITY
VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
GRAIN SIZE AND VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
Project: rAH-07-031
rteret C
Project No.: 185047
Boring No.:
Sample No.: -07
Depth: 0-8.1
Date: 4/23/2018
Description: I SAND, silty, mostly medium to fine-grained quartz, little silt, trace coarse to fine sand -
size rock fragments (SM) 5Y 5/2
Tare Weight, (g): 1 50.04
Dry Wt. Before Washing (g): P=Iwithtare)
with tare)
Dry Weight After Washing (g):
Sieve Size
(Name)
Sieve Size
(mm)
Weight
Retained (g)
/o Passing
Approx.o
Visual Shell
%
Approx. Visual
Shell Wt. (g)
3/4"
19.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/8"
16.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
7/16
11.112
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/16
7.938
0.81
99.33
0
0.00
#3.5
5.600
0.00
99.33
0
0.00
#4
4.750
0.00
99.33
0
0.00
#5
4.000
0.00
99.33
0
0.00
#7
2.800
0.40
98.99
0
0.00
#10
2.000
0.48
98.59
10
0.05
#14
1.400
1.18
97.61
30
0.35
#18
1.000
1.90
96.03
15
0.29
#25
0.710
3.72
92.94
20
0.74
#35
0.500
6.49
87.54
30
1.95
#45
0.355
14.34
75.61
5
0.72
#60
0.250
31.44
49.45
1
0.31
#80
0.180
24.20
29.32
0
0.00
#120
0.125
17.50
14.76
0
0.00
#170
0.090
1.24
13.73
0
0.00
#200
1 0.075
1 0.171
13.591
0
0.00
#230
1 0.063
1 0.101
13.501
0
0.00
Total Shell Content: 1 4 %

..
'
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■Iliil�iii�iilll��r�ll�ll�■■■IIIII■■■■
. .
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■Ili+1�■■■11111�■■■11111�■■■
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■
'
..
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII\■■■IIIII■■■11111�■■■
11111�■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■11111�1■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■
,
11111�■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII�II■■IIIII■■■\IIIII■■■
.
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII���■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■
..
,
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■�■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■
. .
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■It■IIIII■■■IIIII■■
�
,
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■1�■IIIII■■■IIIII■■
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■ii■Ilill�■■■IIIII■■
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■\I■IIIII■■■IIIII■■
'
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■�■IIIII■■■IIIII■■
'
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■►�IIIII�■■■IIIII■■■
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■l�lllll�■■■IIIII■■■
'
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■\�IIIII�■■■IIIII■■■
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■Ilill�■■■11111�■■�\IIIII■■■IIIII■■■
'
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■�iii�l�■■■IIIII■■■
IIIII■■■11111�■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■
IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■■IIIII■■■IIIII■■■
��
�mmmom
��
little slit, trace coarse to fine send-
mmommmProject
s ize rock fragments (SM) 5Y 5/2
Boring No. AH-07-0318-C2
Date 4/23/2018
GRADATIONquartz,
ENG FORM 2087 ^tea j Vj -u
MAY 63
APR 01 Z019
The USC classification is based on laboratory grain size distribution and visual classification
DCM-MHD CITY

RECEIVED
Terracon
9655 Florida Mining Boulevard West
Jacksonville, Florida 32257
[phone] (Tel) • [phone] (Fax)
VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
GRAIN SIZE AND VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
APR 01 Z019
DCM-MHD CITY
Project: Carteret Coun Navigation Project Depth: 0.5
Project No.: EQ185047 Date: 6/6/2018
Boring No.: AH-07
Sample No.: S-1
Description: SAND, poorly -graded, mostly medium to fine-grained quartz, trace silt, trace coarse to
medium sand -size shell fragments (SP) 5Y 7/1
Tare Weight, (g):
Dry Wt. Before Washing (g):
Dry Weight After Washing (g):
(with tare)
(with tare)
Sieve Size
(Name)
Sieve Size
(mm)
Weight
Retained (g)
o
�o Passing
Approx.
Visual Shell
%
Approx. Visual
Shell Wt. (g)
3/4"
19.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/8"
16.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
7/16
11.112
0.00
100.00
01
0.00
5/16
7.938
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#3.5
5.600
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#4
4.750
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#5
4.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#7
2.800
0.20
99.84
100
0.20
#10
2.000
0.02
99.83
100
0.02
#14
1.400
0.09
99.75
0
0.00
#18
1.000
0.12
99.66
100
0.12
#25
0.710
0.49
99.27
1
0.00
#35
0.500
2.95
96.93
0
0.00
#45
0.355
19.27
81.63
0
0.00
#60
0.250
57.80
35.76
0
0.00
#80
0.180
36.81
6.55
0
0.00
#120
0.125
7.36
0.71
0
0.00
#170
0.090
0.21
0.54
0
0.00
#200
0.075
0.05
0.501
01
0.00
#230
0.063
0.051
0.461
01
0.00
Total Shell Content: 1 0 %

ing
•
IIIII�■■■Ililif■■■11111�■■�IIIiC�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
.
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■111111\■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�\■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�11■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�11■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
,
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�11■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII��I■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
,
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII��■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
-
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■�■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
�' ,
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■It■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■It■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
"
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■1�■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■�I■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■�1■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■illll�■�I■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■illll�■�■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■��IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■l�IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
.
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■\�II�II�■■■11111�■■■
„
��
�mmmmm
Carteret County Navigation Project
®�
mmmmmmProject
Boring No. AH-07
Date 616/2018
GRADATION
E NG FORM 2087 ' The USC classification is based on laboratory grain size distribution and visual classification
MAY 63 RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
r)CM-MHD CITY

Terracon
9655 Florida Mining Boulevard West
Jacksonville, Florida 32257
[phone] (Tel) • [phone] (Fax)
RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
VISUAL SHELL CONTENT CITY
GRAIN SIZE AND VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
Project: Carteret Coun Navigation Project Depth: 3.0
Project No.: EQ185047 Date: 6/6/2018
Boring No.: AH-07
Sample No.: S-2
Description: SAND, poorly -graded, mostly medium to fine-grained quartz, trace silt, trace medium to
fine sand -size shell fragments (SP) 5Y 611
I are vveignt, (g): I ') 1.4u
Dry Wt. Before Washing (g): 187.01 (with tare)
Dry Weight After Washing (g): I (with tare)
Sieve Size
(Name)
Name
Sieve Size
mm
( )
Weight
Retained (g)
o
�o Passing
Approx.
Visual Shell
%
Approx. Visual
Shell Wt. (g)
3/4"
19.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/8"
16.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
7/16
11.112
0.00
100.00
01
0.00
5/16
7.938
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#3.5
5.600
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#4
4.750
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#5
4.000
0.10
99.93
100
0.10
#7
2.800
0.34
99.68
100
0.34
#10
2.000
0.35
99.42
50
0.18
#14
1.400
0.65
98.94
50
0.33
#18
1.000
1.07
98.15
50
0.54
#25
0.710
1.79
96.83
10
0.18
#35
0.500
3.11
94.54
10
0.31
#45
0.355
7.27
89.17
1
0.07
#60
0.250
28.03
68.51
1
0.28
#80
0.180
55.14
27.84
0
0.00
#120
0.125
31.52
4.60
0
0.00
#170
0.090
1.30
3.64
0
0.00
#200
0.075
0.181
3.511
0
0.00
#230
0.063
0.131
3.411
0
0.00
Total Shell Content: 1 2 %

W,
" '
IIIII�■■rllill�■■�IIIII�■�`n:�Ir■e■�IIIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
- '
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111►■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■illll�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�1i■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■III
III■■■IIIII�\�■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
-'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■�■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■1\■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■i1■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
-'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■�1■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
�'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■1■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
�
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■�I■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■�l■11111�■■■IIIII�■■e
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■�■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■�IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■I�IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■e■IIIII�■■��IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■i�lllll�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■\�IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
.
.'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■��IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■�\IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
.
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■�ii��1�■■■IIIII�■■■
Project Carteret County NaAgation Project
GRADATION -
ENG FORM 2087
MAY 63 RECEIVED
The USO classification Is based on laboratory grain size distribution and visual classification
APR 01 2019
DCM-MNn

Project:
Project No.:
Boring No.:
Sample No.:
Description:
Terracon
9655 Florida Mining Boulevard West
Jacksonville, Florida 32257
[phone] (Tel) • [phone] (Fax)
VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
GRAIN SIZE AND VISUAL SHELL CONTENT
EQ185047
AH-07
Depth: 7.5
Date: 6/6/2018
SAND, poorly -graded with silt, mostly medium to fine-grained quartz, few silt (SP-SM)
5Y 5/3
Tare Weight, (g):
Dry Wt. Before Washing (g):
Dry Weight After Washing (g):
48.10
(with tare)
164.18
(with tare)
Sieve Size
(Name)
Sieve Size
(mm)
Weight
Retained (g)
° /° Passing
Approx.
Visual Shell
%
Approx. Visual
Shell Wt. (g)
3/4"
19.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/8"
16.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
7/16
11.112
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
5/16
7.938
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#3.5
5.600
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#4
4.750
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#5
4.000
0.00
100.00
0
0.00
#7
2.800
0.11
99.91
0
0.00
#10
2.000
0.30
99.65
0
0.00
#14
1.400
1.04
98.75
0
0.00
#18
1.000
2.03
97.00
0
0.00
#25
0.710
5.58
92.20
0
0.00
#35
0.500
11.27
82.49
0
0.00
#45
0.355
24.96
60.98
0
0.00
#60
0.250
36.95
29.15
0
0.00
#80
0.180
17.81
13.81
0
0.00
#120
0.125
7.83
7.06
0
0.00
#170
0.090
0.96
6.24
0
0.00
#200
1 0.075 1
0.13
6.131
Oi
0.00
#230
1 0.063 1
0.051
6.081
01
0.00
Total Shell Content:
U
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY

IIIII�■■rlllll�■■�11111�■■r!1111�■e■■111111�■■elllll�■
.
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IICl1�■■■IIIII�■■elllll�■�
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
'
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■e■1111��■■■Ilill�■■elllll�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■1111111■■■11111�■■■IIIIi�■■■
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■�■IIIII�■��IIIII�\■�IIIII�■�■IIIII�■��
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�!!■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
11111�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■elllll�ll■■IIIII�■■elllllO■E=
"
,
11111�■e■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII��I■■Ilill�■eelllll�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII��■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■e■
'
'
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■elllll�■�■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■I�■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■
.,
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■1�■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■
IIIII�■■eIIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■�i■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■\1�11111�■■■IIIII�■■
Illil�■e■11111�■■■IIIII�■■elllll�■e�lllll�■■■IIIII�■■
II111�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■■■II111�■■1�11111�■e■IIIII�■■
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■11111�■■■IIIII�■e�!!!!1�■■■IIIII�■e
IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■eIIIII�■■■IIIII�■■■IIIII�■■elllll�■■■
„
��
mmmmmm
Projea Carteret County Navigation Project
GRADATION
ENG FORM 2087
MAY 63 RFCC,veo
' The USC classification is based on laboratory grain size distribution and visual classification
APR 01 2019

Carteret County Shallow Draft Navigation Waterways
Atlantic Harbor Maintenance Dredging
CAMA Major Permit Application
Tab F: Chemical Analysis
R��ENSID
pPR 1 J�N9
DCM,MNo �\YY

�HEIy�
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
2 May 2018
Mr. Robert Neal
Moffatt & Nichol
272 N. Front Street, Suite 204
Wilmington, NC 28401
RE: Chemical Data Summary
Atlantic Harbor
Carteret County Navigation Project
North Carolina
Dear Mr. Neal,
Athena Technologies, Inc. is pleased to submit this Chemical Data Summary for
Atlantic Harbor. Should you have any questions or concerns regarding the attached data
summary, please don't hesitate to contact me via the information below.
Respectfully,
J. Adam Freeze
Vice President / Geologist
RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY
1293 Graham Fann Road, PO Box 68
McClellanwile, South Carolina 29458
HE [phone]
HN r 1 n . w .athenatechnologies.com

TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CHEMICAL DATA SUMMARY
ATLANTIC HARBOR
CARTERET COUNTY NAVIGATION PROJECT
NORTH CAROLINA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table 1: Summary of Analytical Detections — Volatile Organic
Compounds, Semivolatile Organic Compounds, and Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Table 2: Summary of Analytical Detections — Metals and Pesticides
APPENDICES
Appendix A: Laboratory Analytical Reports — Chemical Analyses
RECEIVED
APR 01 Z019
DCM-MHD CITY
1293 Graham Fame Road, PO Box 68
McClellanwile, South Carolina 29458
t( HE (843)
�N i i iN www.athenatechnolhnologiee.com

Appendix A:
Laboratory Analytical Reports - Chemical Analyses
RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY
1293 Graham Farm Road, PO Box 68
McClellanAlle, South Carolina 29458
HE [phone]
r rN w .athenatechnologies.com

TestAmerica °
THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING
ANALYTICAL REPORT
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc.
TestAmerica Pittsburgh
301 Alpha Drive
RIDC Park
Pittsburgh, PA 15238
Tel: [phone]
TestAmerica Job ID: 180-76196-1
Client Project/Site: North Carolina Sediment Project
For:
Athena Technologies, Inc
1293 Graham Farm Road
PO BOX 68
McClellanville, South Carolina 29458
Attn: Adam Freeze
Authorized for release by:
411812018 1:31:35 PM
Carrie Gamber, Senior Project Manager
[phone]
[e-mail]
This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signature is
ntended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature.
Results relate only to the items tested and the samples) as received by the laboratory.
RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY

Client: Athena Technologies, Inc
Project/Site: North Carolina Sediment Project
Table of Contents
TestAmerica Job ID: 180-76196-1
Cover Page ..............................................
Table of Contents .........................................
Case Narrative ...........................................
Definitions/Glossary .......................................
Certification Summary ......................................
Sample Summary .........................................
Method Summary .........................................
Lab Chronicle ............................................
Client Sample Results ......................................
QC Sample Results ........................................
QC Association Summary ...................................
Chain of Custody ..........................................
Receipt Checklists .........................................
1
2
3
5
6
7
8
9
22
58
87
95
104
RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY
TestAmerica Pittsburgh
Page 2 of 106 4/18/2018

Case Narrative
Client: Athena Technologies, Inc
Project/Site: North Carolina Sediment Project
Job ID: 180-76196-1
Laboratory: TestAmerica Pittsburgh
Nmrative
CASE NARRATIVE
TestAmerica Job ID: 180-76196-1
RECEIVED
Client: Athena Technologies, Inc
Project: North Carolina Sediment Project APR 01 2019
Report Number: 180-76196-1 DCM-MHD CITY
With the exceptions noted as flags or footnotes, standard analytical protocols were followed in the analysis of the samples and no
problems were encountered or anomalies observed. In addition all laboratory quality control samples were within established control
limits, with any exceptions noted below. Each sample was analyzed to achieve the lowest possible reporting limit within the constraints of
the method. In some cases, due to interference or analytes present at high concentrations, samples were diluted. For diluted samples,
the reporting limits are adjusted relative to the dilution required.
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.
All holding times were met and proper preservation noted for the methods performed on these samples, unless otherwise detailed in the
individual sections below.
RECEIPT
The samples were received on 03/28/2018 and 03/28/2018; the samples arrived in good condition, properly preserved and on ice. The
temperatures of the 3 coolers at receipt time were 3.40 C, 4.80 C and 5.80 C.
The following samples were listed on the Chain of Custody (COC); however, no samples were received as there was a cooler delayed in
shipment. These samples were received on March 29, 2018 within temperature: AH-07-0318-Gl (180-76196-1). AH-07-0318-G2
(180-76196-2), AH-07-0318-G3 (180-76196-3), AH-07-0318-C (180-76196-4) and AH-06-0318-Gl (180-76196-5).
The container label for the following sample did not match the information listed on the Chain -of -Custody (COC): AH-04-0318-G3
If 80-76196-15). The container labels list AH-04-0318-G2, while the COC lists AH-04-0318-G3. The id on the COC was used.
The Chain -of -Custody (COC) was incomplete as received and/or improperly completed. The COC lists three containers for the following
sample; however two were received.
The vials received for the TOC analysis were preserved at the laboratory per the notation on the COC: EB-02-0318 (180-76196-24)
The following samples were received outside of the holding time for freezing the volatile terracores. The terra core vials were frozen as
soon as possible after receipt. The samples have had the H qualifier applied: AH-07-0318-Gl (180-76196-1), AH-07-0318-G2
(180-76196-2), AH-07-0318-G3 (180-76196-3) and AH-07-0318-C It 80-76196-4).
VOLATILES
Methylene Chloride was detected in method blank MB 180-24089617 at a level that was above the method detection limit but below the
reporting limit. The value should be considered an estimate, and has been flagged. If the associated sample reported a result above the
MDL and/or RL, the result has been flagged.
Methylene Chloride was detected in method blank MB 180-241049/6 at a level that was above the method detection limit but below the
reporting limit. The value should be considered an estimate, and has been flagged. If the associated sample reported a result above the
MDL and/or RL, the result has been flagged.
The following analyte recovered outside control limits for the LCS associated with analytical batch 180-240736: Chloroethane. This is not
indicative of a systematic control problem because these were random marginal exceedances. Qualified results have been reported.
The continuing calibration verification (CCV) associated with batch 180-240660 recovered above the upper control limit for
Dichlorodifluoro-methane. The samples associated with this CCV were non -detects for the affected analytes; therefore, the data have
TestAmerica Pittsburgh
Page 3 of 106 4/18/2098

Case Narrative
Client: Athena Technologies, Inc
Project/Site: North Carolina Sediment Project
Job ID: 180-76196-1 (Continued)
Laboratory: TestAmerica Pinsburgh (Continued)
been reported. The following sample is impacted: (CCVIS 180-240660/2).
TestAmerica Job ID: 180-76196-1
The continuing calibration verification (CCV) associated with batch 180-240865 recovered above the upper control limit for Carbon
Tetrachloride. The samples associated with this CCV were non -detects for the affected analytes; therefore, the data have been reported
The following sample is impacted: (CCVIS 180-240865/2).
SEMIVOLATILES
An incorrect volume of surrogate spiking solution was inadvertently added the following samples: AH-02-0318-C (180-76196-12). Percent
recoveries are based on the amount spiked.
The following samples were diluted due to the nature of the sample matrix: AH-07-0318-C (180-76196-4), AH-06-0318-C (180-76196-8),
AH-02-0318-C (180-76196-12), AH-04-0318-C (180-76196-16), AH-05-0318-C (180-76196-21), AH-05-0318-C-DUP (180-76196-22),
(180-76196-A4-B MS) and (180-76196-A4-C MSD). Elevated reporting limits (RLs) are provided.
The continuing calibration verification (CCV) analyzed in batch 180-241401 was outside the method criteria for the following analyte:
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) was >20% high. As indicated in the reference method, sample analysis may proceed; however, any detection for
the affected analyte is considered estimated.
PESTICIDES
The following samples were diluted due to the nature of the sample matrix: AH-02-0318-C (180-76196-12), AH-04-0318-C
(180-76196-16), AH-05-0318-C (180-76196-21) and AH-05-0318-C-DUP (180-76196-22). Elevated reporting limits (RLs) are provided.
The sample extracts were a medium yellow color after GPC clean-up.
Surrogate DCB Decachlorobiphenyl (Surr) recovery for the following sample was outside control limits on the confirmation column:
EB-02-0318 (180-76196-24). Evidence of matrix interference is present due to preceding sample analyzed; therefore, re -extraction and/or
re -analysis was not performed.
Surrogate recovery was outside acceptance limits for the following sample: (180-76196-A-8-1 MSD). The parent sample and MS
surrogates recovery was within limits. The MSD sample has been qualified and reported.
Several analytes failed the recovery criteria low for the MS/MSD of sample AH-06-0318-C (180-76196-8) in batch 180-242257.
The continuing calibration verification (CCV) associated with batch 242257 recovered outside acceptance criteria, low biased, for
delta-BHC and Endosulfan sulfate. A reporting limit (RL) standard was analyzed, and the target analyte was detected. Since the
associated samples were non -detect for this analyte, the data have been reported.
The continuing calibration verification (CCV) associated with batch 241080 recovered outside acceptance criteria, low biased, for
delta-BHC and Endosulfan sulfate on MR-1 column and Endosulfan sulfate and Endrin ketone on MR-2 column. A reporting limit (RL)
standard was analyzed, and the target analyte was detected. Since the associated samples were non -detect for this analyte, the data
have been reported. Detections of these compounds were taken from their passing column, where applicable.
METALS
No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page.
GENERAL CHEMSITRY
The sample post -digestion spike (PDS) recoveries were outside criteria. Acceptable laboratory control sample (LCS) soluble and
insoluble analysis data demonstrate that the analytical system was operating in control; therefore, this condition is most likely due to a
matrix effect.
The reporting limit for Lloyd Kahn TOC analysis is a nominal value and does not reflect adjustments in sample mass processed on an
individual basis.
RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
TestAmerica Pittsburgh
Page 4 of 106 DCM-MHD CIT' 4/18/2018

Definitions/Glossary
Client: Athena Technologies, Inc
Project/Site: North Carolina Sediment Project
Qualifiers
GCIMS VOA
TestAmerica Job ID: 180-76196-1
Qualifier Quallfler Description
H Sample was prepped or analyzed beyond the specified holding time
J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.
LCS or LCSD is outside acceptance limits.
GC/MS Semi VOA
Qualifier Qualifier Description
J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.
GC Semi VOA
Qualifier Qualifier Description
J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.
p The °/RPD between the primary and confirmation column/detector is >40%. The lower value has been reported.
X Surrogate is outside control limits
Fi MS and/or MSD Recovery is outside acceptance limits.
Metals
Qualifier Qualifier Description
J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.
General Chemistry
Qualifier Qualifier Description
J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.
Glossary
Abbreviation
These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present In this report
a
Listed under five "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis
%R
Percent Recovery
CFL
Contains Free Liquid
CNF
Contains No Free Liquid
DER
Duplicate Error Ratio (normalized absolute difference)
Dil Fac
Dilution Factor
DL
Detection Limit (DoD/DOE)
DL, RA, RE, IN
Indicates a Dilution, Reanalysis, Re -extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample
DLC
Decision Level Concentration (Radiochemistry)
EDL
Estimated Detection Limit (Dioxin)
LOD
Limit of Detection (DoD/DOE)
LOQ
Limit of Quantitation (DoD/DOE)
MDA
Minimum Detectable Activity (Radiochemistry)
MDC
Minimum Detectable Concentration (Radiochemistry)
MDL
Method Detection Limit
ML
Minimum Level (Dioxin)
NC
Not Calculated
ND
Not Detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown)
PQL
Practical Quantitation Limit
RECEIVED
QC
Quality Control
RER
Relative Error Ratio (Radiochemistry)
RL
Reporting Limit or Requested Limit (Radiochemistry)
APR 01 2019
RPD
Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points
TEF
Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin)
TEO
Toxicity Equivalent Quotient(Dioxin)
DCM-MHD CITY
TestAmerica Pittsburgh
Page 5 of 106 4/18/2018

Accreditation/Certification Summary
Client: Athena Technologies, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 180-76196-1
Project/Site: North Carolina Sediment Project
Laboratory: TestAmerica Pittsburgh
Unless otherwise noted, all analytes for this laboratory were covered under each accreditation/certification below.
Authority Program EPA Region IdentlFlcatlon Number Expliatlon Dab
North Carolina (WW/S) Stale Program 4 434 12-31-18
The following analytes are included in this report, but are not accredited/certified under this accreditation/certification:
Analysis Method Prep Method Matrix Anayte
Lloyd Kahn Sediment Total Organic Carbon - Duplicates
The following analytes are included in this report, but accreditation/certification is not offered by the governing authority:
Analysis Method Prep Method Matrix Analyte
2540G Sediment Percent Moisture
254OG Sediment Percent Solids
Laboratory: TestAmerica Pensacola
The acoreditations/certifiestions listed below are app8rable to this report.
Authority Program EPA Region IdentNlentlon Number Expiration Date
North Carolina (yW nivh State Program 4 314 12-31-18
RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY
TestAmerica Pittsburgh
Page 6 of 106 4/18/2018

Sample Summary
Client: Athena Technologies, Inc
Project/Site: North Carolina Sediment Project
TestAmerica Job ID: 180-76196-1
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Matrix
Collected
Received
180-76196-1
AH-07-0318-Gt
Sediment
0327/1808:40
032811811:36
180-76196-2
AH-07-0318-G2
Sediment
0327/1808:42
0328/1811:36
180-76196-3
AH-07.0318-G3
Sediment
0327/1808:45
0328/1811:36
180-761964
AH-07-0318-C
Sediment
0327/1808:50
0328/1811:36
180-76196-5
AH-06-0318-G1
Sediment
0327/1809:20
0328/1811:36
180-76196-6
AH-06-0318-G2
Sediment
0327/18 09:22
0328/18 11:36
'
180-76196-7
AH-06-0318-G3
Sediment
0327/18 09:25
03/28/18 11:36
180-76196-8
AH-06-0318-C
Sediment
0327/18 09:30
0328/18 11:36
180-76196-9
AH-02-0318-GI
Sediment
0327/1809:55
0328/1811:36
180.76196-10
AH-02-0318-G2
Sediment
0327/18 09:57
0328/18 11:36
180-76196-11
AH-02-0318-G3
Sediment
0327/1810:00
0328/1811:36
180-76196-12
AH-02-0318-C
Sediment
0327/1810:05
0328/1811:36
180-76196-13
AH-04-0318-GI
Sediment
0327/1810:40
0328/1809:30
180-76196-14
AH-04-0318-G2
Sediment
0327/1810:42
0328/1809:30
180-76196-15
AH-04.0318-G3
Sediment
0327/1810:45
032811809:30
180-76196-16
AH-04-0318-C
Sediment
0327/1810:50
032&1809:30
180-76196-17
AH-05-0318-G1
Sediment
0327/1811:35
0328/1809:30
180-76196-18
AH-05-0318-Gl-DUP
Sediment
0327/1811:37
032811809:30
180-76196-19
AH-05-0318-G2
Sediment
0327/1811:40
0328/18 09:30
180-76196-20
AH-05-0318-G3
Sediment
0327/18 11:45
0328/18 09:30
180-76196-21
AH-05-0318-C
Sediment
0327/1811:55
0328/1809:30.`,�
180-76196-22
AH-05-0318-C-DUP
Sediment
0327/1811:58
0328/1809:30
180-76196-23
TB-02-0318
Water
0327/1812:30
0328/1809:30
180-76196-24
EB-02-0318
Water
0327/18 12:50
03/28/18 09:30
RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY
TestAmerica Pittsburgh
Page 7 of 106
4/18/2018

Method Summary
Client: Athena Technologies, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 180-76196-1
Project/Site: North Carolina Sediment Project
Method
Method Description
Protocol
Laboratory
EPA 8260E
Volatile Organic Compounds (GCIMS)
SWB46
TAL PIT
8270D LL
Semivolable Organic Compounds by GCIMS - Low Level
SW846
TAL PIT
EPA 8270D LL
Semivolalile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - Low Level
SW846
TAL PIT
8081B_LL
Organochlorme Pesticides (GC)
SW846
TAL PIT
EPA 8081B LL
Organochlorine Pesticides (GC)
SW846
TAL PIT
6020B
Metals (ICP/MS)
SW946
TAL PIT
7471B
Mercury (CVAA)
SV4846
TAL PIT
EPA 6020E
Metals (ICP/MS)
SW846
TAL PIT
EPA 7470A
Mercury (CVAA)
SW546
TAL PIT
1664E
HEM and SGT-HEM
1664E
TAL PEN
254OG
SM 254OG
SM22
TAL PIT
7196A
Chromium, Trivalent (Colorimetric)
SW846
TAL PIT
EPA 7196A
Chromium, Hexavalent
SW846
TAL PIT
EPA 9071E
HEM and SGT-HEM
SW846
TAL PIT
Lloyd Kahn
Organic Carbon, Total (TOC)
EPA
TAL PIT
SM 5310C
Total Organic Carbon
SM
TAL PIT
Protocol References:
1664B = 1664B
EPA = US Environmental Protection Agency
SM = "Standard Methods For The Examination Of Water And Wastewatee',
SM22 = SM22
SW846 = "Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 And Its Updates.
Laboratory References:
TAL PEN = TestAmerica Pensacola, 3355 McLemone Drive, Pensacola, FL 32514, TEL [phone]
TAL PIT = TestAmenca Pittsburgh, 301 Alpha Drive, RIDC Park, Pittsburgh, PA 15238, TEL [phone]
RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY
TestAmerica Pittsburgh
Page 8 of 106 4/18/2018

Lab Chronicle
Client: Athena Technologies, Inc
Project/Site: North Carolina Sediment Project
Client Sample ID: AH-07-0318-G1
Date Collected: 03/27118 08:40
Date Received: 03/28/18 11:36
TestAmerica Job ID: 180-76196-1
Lab Sample ID: 180-76196-1
Matrix: Sediment
Batch Batch oil Initial Final Batch Prepared
Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab
Total/NA Analysis 254OG 1 240823 0329/18 11:32 CLL TAL PIT
Instrument ID: NOEQUIP
Client Sample ID: AH-07-0318-G1
Lab Sample ID: 180-76196-1
Date Collected:
03/27118 08:40
Matrix: Sediment
Date Received:
03/28/18 11:36
Percent Solids: 77.6
Batch Batch
DII Initial
Final
Batch Prepared
Prep Type
Type Method Run
Factor Amount
Amount
Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab
Total/NA
Prep 5035
5.1985 g
5 mL
240903 03129/18 09:21 KLG TAL PIT
TotaVNA
Analysis EPA 8260E
1 5 mL
5 mL
240896 03130/18 15:26 KLG TAL PIT
Instrument ID: CHHP3
Client Sample ID: AH-07-0318-G2 Lab Sample ID: 180-76196-2
Date Collected: 03/27/18 08:42 Matrix: Sediment
Date Received: 03/28/18 11:36
Batch Batch DII Initial Final Batch Prepared
Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab
TotaVNA Analysis 2540G 1 240823 0329/18 11:32 CLL TAL PIT
Instrument ID: NOEQUIP
Client Sample ID: AH-07-0318-G2
Lab Sample ID: 180-76196-2
Date Collected: 03127118 08:42
Matrix: Sediment
Date Received: 03/28/18 11:36
Percent Solids: 77.4
Batch Batch
oil Initial
Final
Batch Prepared
Prep Type Type Method Run
Factor Amount
Amount
Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab
Total/NA Prep 5035
5.0621 g
5 mL
240903 0329118 09:21 KLG TAL PIT
TotaVNA Analysis EPA 8260E
1 5 mL
5 mL
240896 03/30/18 17:23 KLG TAL PIT
Instrument ID: CHHP3
Client Sample ID: AH-07-0318-G3 Lab Sample ID: 180-76196-3
Date Collected: 03/27/18 08:46 Matrix: Sediment
Date Received: 03128/18 11:36
Batch Batch DII Initial Final Batch Prepared
Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab
TotaVNA Analysis 254OG 1 240823 0329/18 11:32 CLL TAL PR
Instrument ID: NOEQUIP
Client Sample ID: AH-07-0318-G3 Lab Sample ID: 180-76196-3
Date Collected: 03127/18 08:45 Matrix: Sediment
Date Received: 03/28118 11:36 Percent Solids: 83.8
Batch Batch DII Initial Final Batch Prepared
Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab
[TotaVNA Prep 5035 1 �D 5.1219 g 5 mL 240 003 33/29/18 09:21 KLG TAL PIT
Fi r
TestAmerica Pittsburgh
APR 01 2019 Page 9 of 106
4/18/2018
DCM-MHD CITY

Lab Chronicle
Client: Athena Technologies, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 180-76196-1
Project/Site: North Carolina Sediment Project
Client Sample ID: AH-07-0318-G3
Lab Sample ID: 180-76196-3
Data Collected: 03/27118 08:45
Matrix: Sediment
Date Received: 0312811811:36
Percent Solids: 83.8
Batch Batch oil Initial
Final Batch Prepared�b--t
Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount
Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Labr-
Total/NA Analysis EPA 8260E 1 5 mL
5 mL 241049 04/02/18 09:40 KLG TAL PR
Instrument ID: CHHP3
Client Sample ID: AH-07-0318-C
Lab Sample ID: 180-76196-4
Date Collected:
03/27/18 08:50
Matrbc: Sediment
Date Received:
03/28118 11:36
Batch Batch
DII Initial
Final Batch Prepared
Prep Type
Type Method
Run Factor Amount
Amount Number or Analyzed
Analyst Lab
Total/NA
Analysis 2540G
1
240823 0329/18 11:32
CLL TAL PIT
Instrument ID: NOEQUIP
TotaI/NA
Analysis 7196A
1
241989 04/12/18 11:38
MM1 TAL PR
Instrument ID: NOEQUIP
Client Sample ID: AH-07-0318-C
Lab Sample ID: 180-761964
Data Collected: 03/27/18 08:50
Matrix:
Sediment
Date Received: 03/28/1811:36
Percent Solids: 81.0
Batch Batch
DII
Initial
Final
Batch
Prepared
Prep Type
Type Method Run
Factor
Amount
Amount
Number
or Analyzed
Analyst
Lab
Total/NA
Prep 3541
30.1 g
0.5 mL
241037
04/02/18 03:39
BAP
TAL PIT
Total/NA
Analysis 82700 LL
2
1 mL
1 mL
241401
04/05/18 15:20
DLF
TAL PR
Instrument ID: CH71
Total/NA
Prep 3541
30.3 g
10.0 mL
241038
04/02/18 03:41
BAP
TAL PIT
Total/NA
Cleanup 3640A
5.0 mL
0.5 mL
241931
04/12/18 06:12
BAP
TAL PR
Total/NA
Analysis 8081 B_LL
1
242257
04/16/1813:54
DFE
TAL PIT
Instrument ID: CHGC15
Total/NA
Prep 30508
2.00 g
100 mL
241695
04/09/18 16:04
KA
TAL PIT
Total/NA
Analysis 60208
1
241911
04/11/18 02:00
WTR
TAL PR
Instrument ID: M
Total/NA
Prep 7471 B
1.32 g
100 mL
241273
04/04/18 08:35
RJR
TAL PIT
Total/NA
Analysis 7471E
1
241400
04/05/18 09:30
RJR
TAL PR
Instrument ID: K
Total/NA
Prep 3060A
2.47 g
100 mL
240858
0329/18 14:32
SES
TAL PIT
Total/NA
Analysis EPA 7196A
1
25 mL
25 mL
240949
03/30/18 13:18
SES
TAL PR
Instrument ID: GENESYS10S
Total/NA
Prep 9071 B
30.0 g
30.0 g
241004
03/31/18 06:25
CBY
TAL PIT
Total/NA
Analysis EPA 9071B
1
241091
04/03/18 08:15
JAS
TAL PIT
Instrument ID: NOEQUIP
Total/NA
Analysis Lloyd Kahn
1
241158
04/02/18 14:55
JBF
TAL PR
Instrument ID: FLASHEA
RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY TestAmerica Pittsburgh
Page 10 of 106 4/18/2018

Lab Chronicle
Client: Athena Technologies, Inc
Project/Site: North Carolina Sediment Project
TestAmerica Job ID: 180-76196-1
Client Sample ID: AH-06-0318-G1 Lab Sample ID: 180-76196-5
Date Collected: 03/27/18 09:20 Matrix: Sediment
Date Received:03128118 11:36
Batch Batch DII Initial Final Batch Prepared
Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst lab
TotaVNA Analysis 254OG 1 240823 0329/18 11:32 CLL TAL PIT
Instrument ID: NOEQUIP
Client Sample ID: AH-06-0318-G1
Lab Sample ID: 180-76196-5
Date Collected: 03/27/18 09:20
Matrix: Sediment
Date Received: 03/28/18 11:36
Percent Solids: 78.9
Batch Batch
DII Initial
Final
Batch Prepared
Prep Type Type Method Run
Factor Amount
Amount
Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab
Total/NA Prep 5035
5.3981 g
5 mL
240903 0329/18 09:21 KLG TAL PR
TotaVNA Analysis EPA 8260B
1 5 mL
5 mL
240896 03/30/18 16:13 KLG TAL PR
Instrument ID: CHHP3
Client Sample ID: AH-06-0318-G2 Lab Sample ID: 180-761964
Date Collected: 03127/18 09:22 Matrix: Sediment
Date Received: 03/28118 11:36
Batch Batch DII InMel Final Batch Prepared
Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab
Total/NA Analysis 254OG 1 240823 0329/18 11:32 CLL TAL PR
Instrument ID: NOEQUIP
Client Sample ID: AH-06-0318-G2
Lab Sample ID: 180-76196-6
Date Collected: 03/27118 09:22
Matrix: Sediment
Date Received: 0312811811:36
Percent Solids: 75.6
Batch Batch
DII Inhlal
Final
Batch Prepared
Prep Type Type Method Run
Factor Amount
Amount
Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab
Total/NA Prep 5035
4.9669 g
5 mL
240903 0329118 09:21 KLG TAL PIT
Total/NA Analysis EPA 8260B
1 5 mL
5 mL
240896 03/30/18 16:36 KLG TAL PR
Instrument ID: CHHP3
Client Sample ID: AH-06-0318-G3
Lab Sample ID: 180-76196-7
Date Collected: 03/27/18 09:25
Matrix: Sediment
Date Received: 03/28/18 11:36
Batch Batch
oil
Initial
Final
Batch Prepared
Prep Type Type Method Run
Factor
Amount
Amount
Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab
TotaVNA Analysis 2540G
1
240823 0329/18 11:32 CLL TAL PIT
Instrument ID: NOEQUIP
Client Sample ID: AH-06-0318-G3
Lab Sample ID: 180-76196-7
Date Collected: 03/27/18 09:25
Matrix: Sediment
Date Received: 03/28/18 11:36
Percent Solids: 79.3
Batch Batch
Dil
Initial
Final
Batch Prepared
Prep Type Type Method Run
Factor
Amount
Amount
Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab
Total/NA Prep 5035
4.9743 g
5 mL
240903 0329/18 09:21 KLG TAL PIT
RECEIVED TestAmerica Pittsburgh
Page 11 of 106 APR 01 Z019 4/18/2018
DCM-MHD CITY

Lab Chronicle
Client: Athena Technologies, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 180-76196-1
ProjecUSite: North Carolina Sediment Project
Client Sample ID: AH-06-0318-G3 Lab Sample ID: 180-76196-7
Date Collected: 03/27/18 09:25 Matrix: Sediment
Date Received: 03128/1811:36 Percent Solids: 79.3
Batch Batch DII InRlal Final Batch Prepared
Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab.':
Total/NA Analysis EPA 8260E 1 5 mL 5 mL 240896 03/30/18 17:00 KLG TAL PIT
Instrument ID: CHHP3
Client Sample ID: AH-06-0318-C Lab Sample ID: 180-76196-8
Date Collected: 03/27118 09:30 Matrix: Sediment
Date Received: 03/28/18 11:36
Batch Batch
DII Initial
Final Batch
Prepared
Prep Type
Type Method
Run Factor Amount
Amount Number
or Analyzed
Analyst Lab
Total/NA
Analysis 254OG
1
2408 33
03/29/18 11:32
CLL TAL PR
Instrument ID: NOEQUIP
,
Total/NA
Analysis 7196A
1
241989
04/12/18 11:38
MMi TAL PIT
Instrument ID: NOEQUIP
Client Sample ID: AH-06-0318-C
Lab Sample ID: 180-76196-8
Date Collected: 03127/18 09:30
Matrix:
Sediment
Date Received: 0312811811:36
Percent Solids: 81.5
Batch Batch
DII
InWal
Final
Batch
Prepared
Prep Type
Type Method Run
Factor
Amount
Amount
Number
or Analyzed
Analyst
Lab
Total/NA
Prep 3541
30.39
0.5 mL
241037
04/02/18 03:39
BAP
TAL PIT
Total/NA
Analysis 8270D LL
2
1 mL
i mL
241401
04/05/18 18:34
DLF
TAL PIT
Instrument ID: CH71
Total/NA
Prep 3541
30.4 g
10.0 mL
241038
04/02/18 03:41
BAP
TAL PIT
Total/NA
Cleanup 3640A
5.0 mL
0.5 mL
241931
04/12/18 06:12
BAP
TAL PIT
Total/NA
Analysis 8081 B—ILL
1
242257
0411611814:10
DFE
TAL PR
Instrument ID: CHGC15
Total/NA
Prep 3050E
2.00 g
100 mL
241695
04/09/18 16:04
KA
TAL PR
Total/NA
Analysis 6020B
1
241911
04/11118 02:05
WTR
TAL PIT
Instrument ID: M
Total/NA
Prep 7471B
1.28 g
100 mL
241273
04/04/18 08:35
RJR
TAL PR
Total/NA
Analysis 7471B
1
241400
04/05/18 09:32
RJR
TAL PIT
Instrument ID: K
Total/NA
Prep 3060A
2.53 g
100 mL
240858
03129/18 14:32
SES
TAL PIT
Total/NA
Analysis EPA 7196A
1
25 mL
25 mL
240949
03/30/18 13:19
SES
TAL PR
Instrument ID: GENESYSIOS
Total/NA
Prep 9071 B
30.0 g
30.0 g
241004
03/31/18 06:25
CBY
TAL PIT
Total/NA
Analysis EPA 9071E
1
241091
04/03/18 08:15
JAS
TAL PR
Instrument ID: NOEQUIP
Total/NA
Analysis Lloyd Kahn
1
241158
04/02/18 15:05
JBF
TAL PR
Instrument ID: FLASHFA
RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
TestAmerica Pittsburgh
Page 12 of 106 DCM-MHD CITY
4/18/2018

Lab Chronicle
Client: Athena Technologies, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 180-76196-1
Project/Site: North Carolina Sediment Project
Client Sample ID: AH-02-0318-G1 Lab Sample ID: 180-76196-9
Date Collected: 03/27/18 09:55 Matrix: Sediment
Date Received: 0312811811:36
Batch Batch DII Initial Final Batch Prepared
Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab
Total/NA Analysis 2540G 1 240823 0329/18 11:32 CLL TAL PIT
Instrument ID: NOEOUIP
Client Sample ID: AH-02-0318-G1
Lab Sample ID: 180-76196-9
Date Collected: 03/27/18 09:55
Matrix: Sediment
Date Received: 03/28118 11:36
Percent Solids: 78.4
Batch Batch
DII Initial
Final
Batch Prepared
Prep Type Type Method Run
Factor Amount
Amount
Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab
Total/NA Prep 5035
5.1779 g
5 mL
240W3 0329118 09:21 KLG TAL PIT
Total/NA Analysis EPA 8260E
1 5 mL
5 mL
240896 03/30/18 17:47 KLG TAL PR
Instrument ID: CHHP3
Client Sample ID: AH-02-0318-G2
Date Collected: 03127/18 09:67
Date Received: 03128/18 11:36
Lab Sample ID: 180-76196-10
Matrix: Sediment
Batch Batch DII Initial Final Batch Prepared
Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab
Total/NA Analysis 254OG 1 240823 0329/18 11:32 CLL TAL PR
Instrument ID: NOEOUIP
Client Sample ID: AH-02-0318-G2 Lab Sample ID: 180-76196-10
Date Collected: 03127118 09:67 Matrix: Sediment
Data Received: 0312811811:36 Percent Solids: 59.7
Batch Batch
DII Initial
Final
Batch
Prepared
Prep Type
Type Method
Run Factor Amount
Amount
Number
or Analyzed
Analyst Lab
Total/NA
Prep 5035
5.3332 g
5 mL
240903
03/29/18 09:21
KLG TAL PR
TotaVNA
Analysis EPA 8260E
1 5 mL
5 mL
240896
03/30/18 18:10
KLG TAL PIT
Instrument ID: CHHP3
Client Sample ID: AH-02-0318-G3 Lab Sample ID: 180-76196-11
Date Collected: 03/27/18 10:00 Matrix: Sediment
Date Received: 03/2811811:36
Batch Batch DII Initial Final Batch Prepared
Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab
Total/NA Analysis 25404T1 240823 03129/18 11:32 GILL TAL PIT
Instrument ID: NOEOUIP
Client Sample ID: AH-02-0318-G3 Lab Sample ID: 180-76196-11
Date Collected: 03/27118 10:00 Matrix: Sediment
Date Received: 0312811811:36 _ Percent Solids: 46.6
Batch Batch oil Initial Final Batch Prepared
Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab
Total/NA Prep 5035 5.1891 g 5 mL 240903 0329/18 09:21 KLG TAL PR
RECEIVED
TestAmerica Pittsburgh
Page 13 of 106 4/18/2018
APR 0 1 Z019
T1rNA_KAl-in rITY

Lab Chronicle
Client: Athena Technologies, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 180-76196-1
Project/Site: North Carolina Sediment Project
Client Sample ID: AH-02-0318-G3 Lab Sample ID: 180-76196-11
Date Collected: 03/27M810:00 Matrix: Sediment
Date Received: 0312811811:36 Percent Solids: 46.5
Batch Batch oil Initial Final Batch Prepared ti°"ry
Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab
Total/NA Analysis EPA 82608 1 5 mL 5 mL 241049 04Po2118 10:27 KLG TAL PR
Instrument ID: CHHP3
Client Sample ID: AH-02-0318-C
Lab Sample ID: 180-76196-12
Date Collected: 03127/18 10:05
Matrix:
Sediment
Date Received: 03/28118 11:36
Batch Batch
DII Initial
Final Batch Prepared
Prep Type Type Method
Run Factor Amount
Amount Number or Analyzed
Analyst
Lab
Total/NA Analysis 254OG
1
240823 03/29/18 11:32
CLL
TAL PIT
Instrument ID: NOEQUIP
Total/NA Analysis 7196A
1
241989 04/12/18 11:38
MMt
TAL PIT
Instrument ID: NOEQUIP
Client Sample ID: AH-02-0318-C
Lab Sample ID: 180-76196-12
Date Collected: 03/2711810:06
Matrix:
Sediment
Date Received: 0312811811:36
Percent Solids: 57.2
Batch Batch
Dil
Initial
Final
Batch
Prepared
Prep Type
Type Method Run
Factor
Amount
Amount
Number
or Analyzed
Analyst
Lab
Total/NA
Prep 3641
30.29
0.5 mL
241037
04/02/18 03:39
BAP
TAL PR
Total/NA
Analysis 8270D LL
4
1 mL
1 mL
241401
04/05118 19:02
DLF
TAL PIT
Instrument ID: CH71
Total/NA
Prep 3541
30.19
10.0 mL
241038
04/02/18 03:41
BAP
TAL PIT
TotaVNA
Cleanup 3640A
5.0 mL
0.5 mL
241931
04/12/18 06:12
BAP
TAL PIT
Total/NA
Analysis 80816 LL
5
242257
04/16/18 14:56
DFE
TAL PIT
Instrument ID: CHGC15
Total/NA
Prep 3050B
1.95 g
100 mL
241695
04/09118 16:04
KA
TAL PIT
Total/NA
Analysis 6020B
1
241911
04111/1802:09
WFR
TAL PIT
Instrument ID: M
Total/NA
Prep 74718
1.31 g
100 mL
241273
04/04118 08:35
RJR
TAL PR
TotaI1NA
Analysis 74718
1
241400
04/05/18 09:34
RJR
TAL PIT
Instrument ID: K
Total/NA
Prep 3060A
2.55 g
100 mL
240858
03/29/18 14:32
SES
TAL PIT
Total/NA
Analysis EPA 7196A
1
25 mL
25 mL
240949
03/30/18 13:23
SES
TAL PR
Instrument ID: GENESYSIOS
Total/NA
Prep 9071E
30.19
30.0 g
241004
03/31/18 06:25
CBY
TAL PIT
Total/NA
Analysis EPA 9071B
1
241091
04/03/18 08:15
JAS
TAL PIT
Instrument ID: NOEQUIP
Total/NA
Analysis Lloyd Kahn
1
241158
04/02/18 15:15
JBF
TAL PIT
Instrument ID: FLASHEA
RECEIVED
APR 01 Z019
TestAmerica Pittsburgh
DCM-MHD CITY
Page 14 of 106 4/18/2018

Lab Chronicle
Client: Athena Technologies, Inc
ProjectlSite: North Carolina Sediment Project
TestAmerica Job ID: 180-76196-1
Client Sample ID: AH4)4-0318-G1 Lab Sample ID: 180-76196-13
Date Collected: 03127I1810:40 Matrix: Sediment
Date Received: 03/28/18 09:30
Batch Batch Dil Initial Final Batch Prepared
Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab
Total/NA Analysis 2540G 1 240793 0329/18 08:42 CLL TAL PIT
Instrument ID: NOEOUIP
Client Sample ID: AH-04-0318-G1 Lab Sample ID: 180-76196-13
Date Collected: 03/27/18 10:40 Matrix: Sediment
Date Received: 03128/18 09:30 Percent Solids: 39.2
Batch Batch
DII Initial
Final
Batch
Prepared
Prep Type
Type Method
Run Factor Amount
Amount
Number
or Analyzed
Analyst Lab
Total/NA
Prep 5035
5.0511 g
5 mL
240706
0328/1812:15
KLG TAL PR
Total/NA
Analysis EPA 8260E
1 5 ml.
5 mL
240660
0328/18 14:17
KLG TAL PR
Instrument ID: CHHP3
Client Sample ID: AH-04-0318-G2 Lab Sample ID: 180-76196-14
Date Collected: 03/27/18 10:42 Matrix: Sediment
Date Received: 03/28/18 09:30
Batch Batch DII Initial Final Batch Prepared
Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab
TotaVNA Analysis 254OG 1 240793 0329/1808:42 CLL TAL PR
Instrument ID: NOEGUIP
Client Sample ID: AH-04-0318-G2
Lab Sample ID: 180-76196-14
Date Collected: 03127/18 10:42
Matrix: Sediment
Data Received: 03/28/18 09:30
Percent Solids: 39.1
Batch Batch
DII Initial
Final
Batch Prepared
Prep Type Type Method Run
Factor Amount
Amount
Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab
ToWNA Prep 5035
5.0915 g
5 mL
240706 03/28/18 12:15 KLG TAL PIT
TotellNA Analysis EPA 8260E
1 5 mL
5 mL
240660 0328/18 14:41 KLG TAL PIT
Instrument ID: CHHP3
Client Sample ID: AH-04-0318-G3 Lab Sample ID: 180-76196-15
Date Collected: 03/27/18 10:45 Matrix: Sediment
Date Received: 03/28/18 09:30
Batch Batch DII Initial Final Batch Prepared
Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab
Total/NA Analysis 254OG 1 2407 33 0329/18 08:42 CLL TAL PR
Instrument ID: NOEOUIP
Client Sample ID: AH-04-0318-G3 Lab Sample ID: 180-7619645
Date Collected: 03/27/18 10:45 Matrix: Sediment
Date Received: 03/28118 09:30 Percent Solids: 46.9
Balch
Batch
DII Initial
Final
Batch
Prepared
Prep Type
Type
Method
Run Factor Amount
Amount
Number
or Analyzed
Analyst Lab
Total/NA
Prep
5035
5.0875 g
5 mL
240706
0328/18 12:15
KLG TAL PR
RECEIVED
TestAmerica Pittsburgh
Page 15 of 106 APR 01 2019 4/18/2018
DCM-MHD CITY

Lab Chronicle
Client: Athena Technologies, Inc
Project/Site: North Carolina Sediment Project
Client Sample ID: AH-04-0318-G3
Date Collected: 03/27/18 10:45
Data Received:03/28/18 09:30
TestAmerica Job ID: 180-76196-1
Lab Sample ID: 180-76196-15
Matrix: Sediment
Percent Solids: 46.9
Batch Batch Dil Initial Final Batch Prepared
Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab
TotaVNA Analysis EPA 8260B 1 5 mL 5 mL 2406 00 03/28/18 15:04 KLG TAL PIT
Instrument ID: CHHP3
Client Sample ID: AH-04-0318-C Lab Sample ID: 180-76196-16
Date Collected: 03/27/18 10:50 Matrix: Sediment
Date Received:03/28118 09:30
Batch Batch DII Initial Final Batch Prepared
Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab
Total/NA Analysis 2540G 1 240793 03/29/18 08:42 CLL TAL PIT
Instrument ID: NOEQUIP
Total/NA Analysis 7196A 1 241989 04/12/1811:38 MMI TAL PIT
Instrument ID: NOEQUIP
Client Sample ID: AH-04-0318-C
Lab Sample ID: 180-76196-16
Date Collected: 03/27/18 10:50
Matrix:
Sediment
Date Received: 03/28/18 09:30
Percent Solids: 41.2
Batch Batch
DII
Initial
Final
Batch
Prepared
Prep Type
Type Method Run
Factor
Amount
Amount
Number
or Analyzed
Analyst
Lab
Total/NA
Prep 3541
30.29
0.5 mL
241037
D4/02/18 03:39
BAP
TAL PIT
Total/NA
Analysis 8270D LL
5
1 mL
1 mL
241401
D4/05/18 19:30
DLF
TAL PIT
Instrument ID: CH71
Total/NA
Prep 3541
30.1 g
10.0 mL
241038
04/02/18 03:41
BAP
TAL PIT
Total/NA
Cleanup 3640A
5.0 mL
0.5 mL
241931
04/12/18 06:12
BAP
TAL PIT
Total/NA
Analysis 8081B_LL
5
242257
04/16/1815:11
DFE
TAL PIT
Instrument ID: CHGC15
Total/NA
Prep 3050E
2.00 g
100 mL
241695
04/09/18 16:04
KA
TAL PIT
Total/NA
Analysis 6020B
1
241911
04/11/1802:14
W!R
TAL PIT
Instrument ID: M
Total/NA
Prep 7471 B
1.33 g
100 mL
241273
04/04/18 08:35
RJR
TAL PIT
Total/NA
Analysis 7471B
1
241400
04/0511609:36
RJR
TAL PIT
Instrument ID: K
Total/NA
Prep 3060A
2.53 g
100 mL
240858
03/29/18 14:32
SES
TAL PIT
Total/NA
Analysis EPA 7196A
1
25 mL
25 mL
240949
03/30/18 13:24
SES
TAL PIT
Instmment ID: GENESYSIOS
Total/NA
Prep 90718
30.2 g
30.0 g
241004
03/31/16 06:25
CBY
TAL PIT
Total/NA
Analysis EPA 9071E
1
241091
04/03/18 08:15
JAS
TAL PR
Instrument ID: NOEQUIP
Total/NA
Analysis Lloyd Kahn
1
240909
03/29/18 16:39
JBF
TAL PIT
Instrument ID: FLASHEA
RECEIVED
APR 01 2019
DCM-MHD CITY
TestAmerica Pittsburgh
Page 16 of 106
4/18/2018