39-20EX Craven County/City of New Bern

Permit Class
NEW / EXPRESS
Permit Number
39-20
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Quality
and
Coastal Resources Commission
Vermt"t
for
X Major Development in an Area of Environmental Concern
pursuant to NCGS 113A-118
Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229
Issued to Craven County / City of New Bern, 406 Craven St, New Bern, NC 28560
Authorizing development in Craven County at confluence of the Trent and Neuse Rivers, at
203 S. Front St., New Bern Convention Center , as requested in the permittee's application dated 2/04/2020,
including attached workplan drawings, eight (8) all dated 09/30/19 labeled Project No. 19015.
This permit, issued on April 06, 2020 is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent with the
permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may
be subject to fines, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and void.
Upland Development
1) Unless specifically altered herein, this permit authorizes the grading and'other land disturbing
activities associated with the development of the stormwater improvement project and associated
infrastructure, all as expressly and specifically set forth in the attached permit application and
workplan drawings. Any additional land disturbing activities and/or construction may require a
modification of this permit. Contact a Division of Coastal Management representative at (252) 808-
2808 for this determination.
(See attached sheets for Additional Conditions)
This permit action may be appealed by the permittee or other
qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the issuing date.
This permit must be accessible on -site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification not covered
hereunder requires further Division approval.
All work must cease when the permit expires on
December 31, 2023
In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees that
your project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal
Management Program.
Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DEQ and the Chair
of the Coastal Resources Commission.
RQ� t3�w�
For Braxton C. Davis
Braxton C. Davis, Director
Division of Coastal Management
This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted.
Signature of Permittee

Craven County / City of New Bern
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Sedimentation and Erosion Control
No. 39-20
Page 2 of 3
2) In order to protect water quality, runoff from construction shall not visibly increase the amount of
suspended sediments in adjacent waters.
3) Appropriate and effective sedimentation and erosion control devices, measures or structures (e.g. silt
fence, diversion swales or berms, etc.) shall be implemented and maintained to ensure its function to
prevent eroded and unconsolidated materials from entering adjacent wetlands, watercourses and
properties.
Stormwater
4) NCDEMLR approval of this project under stormwater management rules of the Environmental
Management Commission is covered by way of Stormwater Permit No. SW7000926, which was issued
on 07/06/2006 and renewed on 01/21/2020. Any violation of the permit approved by the NCDEMLR
shall be considered a violation of this CAMA permit. The Permittee shall obtain any modification of the
Stormwater Permit as may be required.
General
5) Upon completion of the project, stabilization of the disturbed areas shall take place in accordance with
the attached workplan drawings and project time specifications.
6) This permit does not authorize any impacts to jurisdictional wetlands or waters without obtaining prior
authorization from the appropriate state and federal agencies and a permit modification.
7) This permit shall not be assigned, transferred, sold, or otherwise disposed of to a third party without the
written approval of the Division of Coastal Management.
8) The permittee shall conduct the authorized work in conformance with the terms and conditions of this
permit and any other state or federal authorization or permit. The permittee is not relieved of this
requirement if the project is abandoned or discontinued without having it transferred to a third party.
9) The permittee and/or agent and contractor shall meet or consult with with a representative of the
Division prior to project initiation.

Craven County / City of New Bern No. 39-20
Page 3 of 3
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
NOTE: This permit does not eliminate the need to obtain any additional state, federal or local permits,
approvals or authorizations that may be required.
NOTE: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers authorized Project AID No. 2020-00506. No Permit
Required from USACE provided there are no impacts to jurisdictional waters or wetlands.
NOTE: The N.C. Division of Water Resources authorized the proposed project by way of NCDWR
Buffer Authorization and assigned the project DWR Project No. 2020-0360.
NOTE: Future development of the permittee's property may require a modification of this permit.
Contact a representative of the Division at [phone] prior to the commencement of any
such activity for this determination. The permittee is advised that many development or land
disturbing activities are not allowed within the Environmental Management Commission's
Tar/Pamlico River basin. Contact a representative of the Division of Water Resources at (252)
946-6481 for more information concerning allowable uses within the Tar/Pamlico River Buffer.
NOTE: An Express Permit application processing fee of $4,000 was received by DCM for this project.

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
APPLICATION TRANSMITTAL AND PROCESSING RECORD
APPLICANT: City of New Bern/Craven County COUNTY: Craven
PROJECT NAME: City of New Bern/Craven County .
LOCATION OF PROJECT: 203 S. Front Street New Bern North Carolina
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED COMPLETE BY FIELD: 3-10-20
FIELD RECOMMENDATION: Attached: No
To Be Forwarded: Yes
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE: Brownlo DISTRICT OFFICE: MOREHEAD CITY
DISTRICT MANAGER REVIEW:
B) DATE RECEIVED BY MAJOR PERMITS IT: _3/10/2020_ FEE REC'D: Express Split # Click or tap here
to enter text.
APPLICATION ASSIGNED TO: Bodnar
PUBLIC NOTICE REC'D: 3-12-20
ADJ. RIP. PROP NOTICES REC'D:
C) 30 DAY DEADLINE: 4-9-20
HOLDS:
MAIL OUT DATE: 3-11-20
PERMIT FINAL ACTION: ISSUE DENY
END OF NOTICE DATE: 3-24-20
DEED REC'D: Choose an item.
150 DAY DEADLINE:
STATE DUE DATE: Click or tap to enter a date.
AGENCY
DATE
COMMENTS
RETURNED
OBJECTIONS:
YES NO
NOTES
DCM — Field Rep
DCM — LUP Consistency Determination
Local Permit Officer
Corps of Engineers — Regulatory Branch
DWR-401 Section
D WR — Public Water Supply
DEMLR — Stormwater & Sod/Erosion
DOA — State Property Office
Wildlife Resources Commission
DMF — Shellfish Section
DMF — Habitat & Enhancement
DNCR — Archives & History
DNCR — Natural Heritage Program
NCDOT
Rural Development Division

EXPRESS PERMIT APPLICATION
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
APPLICANT'S NAMES: Craven County / City of New Bern
LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: The project is located at 203 S. Front Street,
New Bern, Craven County, at the New Bern Convention Center. From US Hwy 70
East, take E. Front Street northward across the Trent River. Turn left onto S. Front
Street and the project location is immediately on the left.
Latitude:35.102953 Longitude:-77.037248
INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA
INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Date(s) of Site Visit — 03/09/2020
Was Applicant or Agent Present —No
Photos Taken — No
PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received — cc: 03/09/2020
Office — MHC
SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan — New Bern -Trent Woods -River Bend (2/24/2011)
Land Classification from LUP —Developed
(B) AEC(s) Involved: Coastal Shoreline
(C) Water Dependent: No
(D) Intended Use: Public
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing — Municipal
Planned - N/A
(F) Type of Development: Existing — Building, patio, sidewalks, boardwalks,
parking areas, bulkhead
Planned - Redevelopment of existing impervious
surface areas and infiltration basins
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source — N/A
HABITAT DESCRIPTION: DREDGED FILLED INCORP/SHADED
(A) High Ground 7,018 sf
(E) Total Area Disturbed: 15,568 ft?
(F) Primary Nursery Area: No
(G) Water Classification: SB; Sw; NSW Open: No
(H) Cultural Resources: None
Project Summary: The applicants propose to re -develop the existing outdoor
patio space at the New Bern Convention Center to a multi -level patio area for
public municipal and recreational use and construct two infiltration basins to
treat the increased impervious surface area runoff.

Field Investigation Report:
New Bern Convention Center
Page 2
Narrative Description:
The property is located contiguous with the Trent River at or near the confluence of the
Trent and Neuse Rivers, in New Bern, Craven County. The property is bordered on the
north by South Front Street and on the east by East Front Street and on the south by the
Trent River. This property is currently developed for commercial and public use as a
convention center. The adjacent developed properties include a commercial hotel with a
marina to the west; paved parking areas to the north; East Front Street Right of Way to the
east and Union Point Recreation Center is east of East Front Street. The City of New Bern
owns the riparian 30' wide strip of land running parallel with the shoreline which is paved
with concrete and used as a boardwalk.
The elevation of the high ground of the parcel averages 7' above the normal water level
(nwl). Vegetation on the parcel mainly consists of planted trees and landscaped lawn. The
3.04-acre has approximately 532 linear feet of continuous shoreline along the Trent River
within the project site There are no coastal or non -coastal wetlands within the project area.
This area is considered as Urban Waterfront and is located within the Division of Water
Resources Neuse River Riparian Buffer Area. This property is located within the New Bern
Historic District and is registered with the National Historical Registry. The Trent River is
classified as Joint Waters at this location and the Neuse is classified as Coastal Waters in
this area. There is not a cultural resource within the project property. The Trent River is
approximately 1,315 feet across at this location. These waters are not classified as a
Primary Nursery Area. Submerged aquatic vegetation is not present at this location. This
area is closed to shellfish harvest and is classified as SB; Sw; Nutrient Sensitive Waters.
There is no development proposed waterward of the normal water level. This project
requires a NCDEMLR Stormwater Permit modification and a Neuse River Basin buffer
authorization from the NCDWR which triggered the CAMA Major Development Permit
application.
Proposed Development:
The existing New Bern Riverfront Convention Center proposes to enlarge their outdoor
patio space. The proposed multi -level patio would increase the amount of impervious
surface on the site. Through innovative design, there would be two infiltration basins
proposed to treat the increased impervious area. The onsite soil consists of loamy sand to
sand. The site currently runs off directly into the Trent River which is a tributary to the
Neuse River. The proposed site improvements would increase the onsite impervious area
2,274.28sf. The site design would provide two small infiltration basins that would treat
5,838.38sf of total drainage area, 5,553.9sf of which is impervious. The infiltration basins
would trap the 1.5" storm runoff and allow the runoff to infiltrate the natural ground at a
rate of 1.1 IN/HR as per the engineering report.
Roy Brownlow . March 11, 2020 Morehead City

Field Investigation Report:
New Bern Convention Center
Paae 3
Post -development runoff would be less than the existing conditions because of the
proposed infiltration basins. The impervious surface area that would drain into the existing
stormwater control would be reduced by 3,279sf.
The proposed project would involve removing existing impervious areas in the 75 AEC
area and locating it closer to the existing building to create a more useable patio area for
the convention center. The current patio and sidewalk configurations limit use of this space
according to the project engineers. The project would re -locate the patio area closer to
the existing building while removing existing sidewalk area scattered around the yard.
The total 75' Estuarine Shoreline AEC area onsite is 23,225sf. There is 8,329sf of existing
impervious surface within the total 75' AEC. Approximately 5,161 SF of existing impervious
surface would be removed and 3,850sf would be re -developed within the 75' AEC. This
would result in an impervious area reduction of 1,311sf within the AEC area or a total
impervious cover of 7,018sf (30.2%), which is less than the existing impervious coverage.
The total disturbance in the 75' AEC area would be 15,568sf. This is largely due to the
areas of existing impervious surface that would be removed and the proposed grading that
would be necessary to these areas after completion. Silt and sedimentation barrier fencing
would be used to control and retain the sediment onsite and to prevent it running off into
the adjacent waterbody. The existing developed area in the Neuse River Basin Zone 1 of
the buffer would be redeveloped by removal of 806sf of impervious area and a lower
amount of 248sf of impervious area would be placed back over the previously developed
area. The total disturbance within 30' of NWL would be 4,159sf. The total ground
disturbance in the Neuse River buffer area would be 16,634sf.
Anticipated Impacts:
As this project is proposed to connect to the waterfront boardwalk, the project would
impact the estuarine shoreline to within 12.5' of the NHW line (Bulkhead). There are no
wetlands onsite and no.development is proposed within public trust or estuarine waters.
The proposed design includes the use of sand filters for stormwater runoff treatment.
According to the project design engineers, these sand filters would capture more area
than is required. The proposed infiltration systems would provide more stormwater
treatment than the existing conditions onsite according to the project engineers.
Impacts include temporary high ground shoreline disturbance as a result of the removal of
the existing sidewalk and the associated grading and landscaping.
Long term impacts would include the replacement of the sidewalk although at a reduced
impervious surface area than the existing development. Effective sedimentation barriers
and measures between the project site and the adjacent waterbody would remain in place
until a vegetative cover could be replaced and established. This proposed project would
.Roy Brownlow March 11, 2020 ' Morehead City

Field Investigation Report:
New Bern Convention Center
Paae 4
reduce the amount of stormwater runoff from the property into the Trent River through
innovative stormwater design and as a result, the stormwater treatment would be
improved.
Existing Permits: SW 7020712
Roy Brownlow March 11, 2020 Morehead City

"'This is a word processing form to be completed in Microsoft Word —
NC Division of Coastal Management
Major Permit Application Computer Sheet - EXPRESS PERMIT APPLICATION
(1 11112012)
Applicant: City of New Bem / Craven County Date: 3/10/2020
Project Site County: Craven
Staff: Roy Brownlow, District: []Elizabeth City ❑Washington
®Morehead City ❑Wilmington
Project Name: NEW BERN CONVENTION CENTER PATIO /
STORMWATERIMPROVMENTS
Date of initial application submittal (EX: 1/8/2007): 03/06/2020
Date application "received as complete" in the Field office (EX: 1/8/2007): 03/09/2020
Permit Authorization: ®CAMA []Dredge & Fill Both
SITE DESCRIPTION/PERMIT INFORMATION
PNA: []Yes ONO
Photos Taken: Yes ❑ No®
Setback Required (riparian): Yes ® No
Critical Habitat: ❑Yes ®No ❑Not Sure
15 foot waiver obtained: ❑Yes ®No
Hazard Notification Returned:
[]Yes ®No
SAV: ❑Yes ®No []Not Sure
Shell Bottom: ❑Yes ®No []Not Sure
Temporary Impacts: ❑Yes ®No
Sandbags: ❑Yes ®No ❑ Not Sure
Did the land use classification come from
county LUP: ®Yes []No
Mitigation Required (optional):
[]Yes ®No
Moratorium Conditions: []Yes ®No
❑NA
Environmental Assessment Done:
❑Yes []No ® NA
SECONDARY WATER CLASSIFICATION - OPTIONAL (choose MAX of 4)
❑ Future Water Supply (FWS)
® Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW)
® Swamp Waters (SW)
High Quality Waters (HQ"
❑ Outstanding Resource Waters (OR"
WETLANDSIMPACTED
❑ (404) Corp. of Engineers (Jurisdictional
(LS) Sea lavender (Limonium sp.)
❑ (SS) Glasswort (Salioomia sp.)
wetlands)
❑ (CJ) Saw grass (Cladium jamaicense)
❑ (SA) Salt marsh cordgrass (Spartina
(SY) Salt reed grass (Spartina
alterniflora)
cynosuroides)
❑ (DS) Salt or spike grass (Distichlis
❑ (SC) Bullrush or three square (Scirpus
❑ (TY) Cattail (Typha sp.)
spicata)
sp.)
❑ (JR) Black needlerush (Juncus
(SP) Salt/meadow grass (Spartina
roemerianus)
patens)
APPLICATION FEE
❑ No fee required - $0.00
❑ III(A) Private w/ D&F up to 1 acre; 3490
❑ III(D) Priv. public or comm w/ D&F to 1
can be applied - $250
acre; 3490 can't be applied - $400
Minor Modification to a CAMA Major
❑ Major Modification to a CAMA Major
❑ IV Any development involving D&F of
permit - $100
permit - $250
more than 1 acre - $475
❑ Permit Transfer - $100
III(B) Public or commercial w/ D&F to 1
® Express Permit - $2000
acre; 3490 can be applied - $400
❑ Major development extension request -
❑ II. Public or commercial/no dredge
$100
and/or fill - $400
❑ I. Private no dredge and/or fill - $250
❑ III(C) Priv. public or comm w /D&F to 1
acre; 3490 can be applied; DCM needs
DWQ agreement - $400
252-808-2808 :: 1.888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastalmanaaement.net revised: 02/15/10

NC Division of Coastal Mgt. Application Computer Sheet, Page 2 of 3)
Applicant: New Bern Convention Center
Date: 3/10/20
Describe below the ACTIVITIES that have been applied for. All values should match the dimension order, and units of
measurement found in your Activities code sheet
Activity Name
Number
TYPE
Choose
One
REPLACE
Choose
One
Dimension 1
Dimension 2
Dimension 3
Dimension 4
High Ground
Disturbance
1
New Work ®
Maint ❑
Replace
MY ❑ N
124.78
124.78
1
New Work ❑
Maint ❑
Replace
❑ Y ❑ N
]
New Work ❑
Maint ❑
Replace
❑ Y [IN__
revised 02/1S110

NC Division of Coastal Mgt. Application Computer Sheet, Page 3 of 3)
Applicant: New Bem Convention Center
Date: 3/10/20
Describe below the HABITAT disturbances for the application. All values should match the name, and units of measurement
found in your Habitat code sheet.
Habitat Name
DISTURB TYPE
Choose One
TOTAL Sq. Ft.
(Applied for.
Disturbance total
includes any
anticipated
restoration or
temp impacts)
FINAL Sq. Ft
(Anticipated final
disturbance.
Excludes any
restoration
and/or temp
impact amount)
TOTAL Feet
(Applied for.
Disturbance
total includes
any anticipated
restoration or
temp impacts)
FINAL Feet
(Anticipated final
disturbance.
Excludes any
restoration and/or
temp impact
amount
High Ground
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ®
7,018
7,018
7,018
7,018
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastalmanaaement.net revised: 02/15/10

OCM MP-t
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
(last revised 12/27/06)
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1. Primary Applicant/ Landowner Information
Business Name
Project Name (if applicable)
Craven County And The City Of New Bern
New Bern Riverfront Convention Center Renovabon-Phase 2
Applicant 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Jack
Veit, III
Applicant 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Mark
Stephens
If additional applicants, please attach an additional pages) with names listed.
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
406 Craven Street
New BernNC
ZIP
Country
Phone No.
FAX No.
285604971
Craven
252-636-6600 ext.
- -
Street Address (J different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
[e-mail]
2. Agent/Contractor Information
Business Name
Stocks Engineering, Pa
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Kevin
Varnell
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
1108
Nashville
NC
ZIP
Phone No. 1
Phone No. 2
27856
252 - 459 - 8196 mt.
- - ext.
FAX No.
Contractor #
252 459 8197
Street Address (if different from above)
city
Slate
ZIP
801 East Washington Street
Nashville
NC
27856 -
Email
[e-mail]
<Form continues on back>
RECEIVED
252-808.2808 :. 1-888-4RCOAST :. www. ncco astaima nagement. net
DCM-MHD CITY

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 2 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
3. Project Location
County (can be multiple)
Street Address
State Rd. #
Craven
203 South Front Street
Subdivision Name
City
State
Zip
New Bern
NC
28560 - 4971
Phone No.
Lot No. (a) (if many, attach additional page with list)
252 - 636 - 6600 ext.
I I ,
a. In which NC river basin is the project located?
b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
Neuse
Trent River
c. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade?
d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
®Natural []Manmade ❑Unknown
Trent River
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
f. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
®Yes []No
work falls within.
City of New Bern
4. Site Description
a.
Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.)
b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.)
0
3.36
c.
Size of individual lolls)
d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
NWL (nomial water level)
(If many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list)
4' ❑NHW or ®NWL
e.
Vegetation on tract
Grassed Lawn with Landscaping including trees and bushes
f.
Man-made features and uses now on tract
New Bern Convention Center and City of New Bern Waterfront Boardwalk
g.
Identify and describe the existing land uses ad'acen to the proposed project site.
The she only has one bordering property that is developed and that is curently a hotel.
h.
How does local government zone the tract?
1. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
C-2
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
®Yes []No ❑NA
J.
Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? ®Yes [:]No
k.
Hasa professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, by whom?
I.
Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does It involve a ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
National Register listed or eligible property?
<Form continues on next page> RECEIVED
MAR 0 6 2020
252-808-2808 :: 'I.888.4RCOAST :: www.nccoastalmanageme nftM_MHD CITY

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 3 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
m. (I) Are there wetlands on the site? ❑Yes ENo
(ii) Are there coastal wetlands on the site? ❑Yes MNo
(iii) If yes to either (i) or (ii) above, has a delineation been conducted? ❑Yes MNo
(Attach documentation, if available)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
No additional sewer is needed for the proposed patio additon. Existing sewer served by City of New Bern.
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
No additional water is needed for the proposed patio additon. Existing water served by City of New Bern
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems.
A small portion of the existing site is being treated through an infiltration basin.
5. Activities and Impacts
a.
Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use?
❑Commercial MPublicfGovemment
❑Private/Community
b.
Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
The purpose of this project is to reconfigure the existing patio to a better use and fit
for specific programs.
c.
Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
Small size construction equipment will be used. le. Bobcat, Mini -Excavator, etc.
d.
List all development activities you propose.
Minor Grading, Forming and Pouring Concrete, Pervious Pavers, and Landscaping.
e.
Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both?
New Work
f.
What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project?
0.53 ❑Sq.Ft or EAcres
g.
Wilt the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area
EYes ❑No DNA
that the public has established use of?
h.
Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
There are no proposed discharges to waters of the state.
I.
Will wastewater or stormwater be discharged into a wetland?
❑Yes MNo DNA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water?
❑Yes ❑No MNA
j.
Is there any mitigation proposed?
❑Yes MNo DNA
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal.
RECEIVED
<Form continues on back>
MAR 0 6 2020
252.808.2808 :: 1-888.4RCOAST :: www.nccoastalmanagemenbCM-MHDCITY

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 4 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
6. Additional Information
In addition to this completed application form, (MP -I) the following items below, if applicable, must be submitled in order for the application
package to be complete. Items (a) — (Dare always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
instruction booklet on how to property prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
a A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other Instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
f. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name Hospitality Associates of New Sam Phone No. 910-279-2611
Address PO Box 339, Laurinburg, NC 28536
Name North Carolina Railroad Company Phone No. 919-964.7601
Address 2809 Highwoods Blvd, Ste 100, Raleigh, NC 27604
Name Phone No.
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, perrnittee, and issuing dates.
SW 7020172
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, it applicable.
t. Wetland delineation, if necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10), if necessary. If the project Involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
7. Certification and Permission to Enter on Land
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Dale 02.1104 LgLoxo Print Name
Signature
Please Indicate application attachments pertaining to yo roposed project.
❑DCM MP-2 Excavation and FIII Information pDCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
®DCM MP-3 Upland Development
ODCM MP-4 Structures Information
RECEIVED
MAR 0 6 2020
252•800.2008 it �•uua.4 Rc aAs•r :: www.n,:ceaseafmNllAg Ble @fI Q.NeQ

'Form DCM MP-3
UPLAND DEVELOPMENT
(Construction and/or land disturbing activities)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
GENERAL UPLAND DEVELOPMENT
a. Type and number of buildings, facilities, units or structures b. Number of lots or parcels.
proposed. I
NA
c. Density (give the number of residential units and the units per
acre).
NA
e. If the proposed project will disturb more than one acre of land, the
Division of Land Resources must receive an erosion and
sedimentation control plan at least 30 days before land -disturbing
activity begins.
(i) If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion control plan been
submitted to the Division of Land Resources?
❑Yes []No ®NA
(ii) If yes, list the date submitted:
g. Give the percentage of the tract within the coastal shoreline AEC to
be covered by impervious and/or built -upon surfaces, such as
pavement, building, rooftops, or to be used for vehicular driveways
or packing.
25%
i. Give the percentage of the entire tract to be covered by impervious
and/or built -upon surfaces, such as pavement, building, rooftops,
or to be used for vehicular driveways or packing.
71.5%
j. Describe proposed method of sewage disposal.
NA. This project is for the renovation of the patio.
I. Describe location and type of proposed discharges to waters of the
state (e.g., surface runoff, sanitary wastewater, industriall
commercial effluent, 'Wash down" and residential discharges).
Stormwater is discharged through sheetNow and infiltration
basins.
d. Size of area to be graded, filled, or disturbed including roads,
ditches, etc.
0.53 Acres
f. List the materials (such as marl, paver stone, asphalt, or concrete)
to be used for impervious surfaces.
Concrete, Block, etc.
h. Projects that require a CAMA Major Development Permit may also
require a Stormwater Certification.
(i) Has a site development plan been submitted to the Division of
Water Quality for review?
®Yes []No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, list the date submitted:
k. Have the facilities described in Item (i) received state or local
approval?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, attach appropriate documentation.
m. Does the proposed project include an innovative stormwater
design?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, attach appropriate documentation.
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY
262-808-28082 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastaimanaeement.net revised: 12/26/06

Form -DCM MP-3 (Upland Development, Page 2 of 2)
A .
m. Describe proposed drinking water supply source (e.g., well,
community, public system, etc.)
NA. Tis project is for the renovation of the patio.
o. When was the lot(s) platted and recorded?
Unknown.
1/29/2020
Date
New Bern Riverfront Convention Center Renovation Phase 2
Project Name
J. Kevin Vamell , Stocks Engineering
Applicant Name
App' nt Signature
n. (i) Will water be impounded? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, how many acres?
p. If proposed development is a subdivision, will additional utilities be
installed for this upland development?
❑Yes ❑No ®NA
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY
252-808-2808 :: 1.888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastairnanagement.net revised: 12/26/06

U-S- POstal Service"
III
CERTIFIED PAAIL'R'RECEI
r-1 DomestjoMdjjo,1Y
PT
Er �7 -��I
�
rrl L_For delivery i,fo,m
M
Ln 27'60'4'-�
MI
rrl
mi s $
si �vUuSd
C3 10 A.,"
0
—31—m
Here
vqa
Is_ c
r-1 !otai Postage an s
lt
13- ts . .9.9
C:l Care I Iran
17� !.!
RECEIVED
MAR 0 6 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

Co -Applicant Information for LAMA Permit
City of New Bern
Mark Stephens, City Manager
300 Pollock Street,
New Bern, NC 27560
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
RECEIVED
MAR 0 6 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

CERTIFIED MAIL • RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION/WAIVER FORM
Name of Property Owner: Craven County
Address of Property: 203 South Front Street, New Bern, Craven County
(Lot or Street #, Street or Road, City & County)
Agent's Name #: Stocks Engineering
Agent's phone #: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 1108
Nashville, NC 27856
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to the above referenced property. The individual
applying for this permit has described to me as shown on the attached drawing the development� __
. FA —description they are proposingor drawing with dimensions must be provided ,___with this letter.
\/I have no objections to this proposal. I have objections to this proposal.
If you have objections to what is being proposed, you must notify the Division of Coastal Management
(DCM) in writing within 10 days of receipt of this notice. Contact information for DCM offices Is
available at http://www, nccoastalmanagement. netlweb/cm/staff-listing or by calling 1-888-4RCOAST.
No response is considered the same as no objection if you have been notified by Certified Mail.
WAIVER SECTION
I understand that a pier, dock, mooring pilings, boat ramp, breakwater, boathouse, or lift must
be set back a minimum distance of 15' from my area of riparian access unless waived by me. (If
you wish to waive the setback, you must initial the appropriate blank below.)
I do wish to waive the 15' setback requirement.
I do not wish to waive the 15' setback requirement.
(Property Owner Information)
maul=13. ✓04m
nature
Jac lc f3. Va,
Print or Name
}bb r�van 1f
Malllng6Addrass 2 ?56u
Na w .,•„ N
City/state/Zl
252 - es b - &(. ao
Telephone umber/ema#address
oa o4laaao
Dale
'Valid for one calendar year after signature'
affing Add
e ep n" mbe /email add ss r t •
!�R fh
atep I
—
(Revised Aug. 2014)
RECEIVED
MAR 0 6 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FOR CAMA PERMIT APPLICATION
Name of Property Owner Requesting Permit: e:�re-wetA C"
Mailing Address: ge GadCN S-k-*.*A
Phone Number: 2�5to 3(4 o ("0
Email Address: 146—' p-
I certify that I have authorized
to act on my behalf, for the purpose of applying for and obtaining all CAMA permits
necessary for the following proposed development: �r c.J ge"
at my property located at ZOS S . S(
in Un County.
I furthermore certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to
Division of Coastal Management staff, the Local Permit Officer and their agents to enter
on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application.
Property Owner Information:
.e 1
Signature
Pack 03 • Vti4L =
Print or Type Name
Coun'y MR►tAgGr _
f Title
oa 1 0 4 1 A04R0
Date
RECEIVE
. I MAR 0 2 2020
This certification is valid through OZ / O`1 / ZU2,
DCM-MHD CITY

Land Owner Consent. The City of New Bern, as the landowner of the Greenway
Area along the New Beim waterfront, hereby provides consent for Craven County and
Stocks Engineering to file permits on behalf of the New Bern Convention Center and
it's connections with the existing New Bern owned greenway along the property
frontage on the Trent River in conjunction with the proposed plans.
319 WAD
09
Date type or Priht Name
-ArIDD a5a- U30f-a84
Telephone Fax Title 6r Authority
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM.MHD CITY

ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER STATEMENT
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to Lly,' I — 1 � 1 's
me df property located at I (o M , � A i 0 .�) n 1a� , ( D n r— M /, rty Owner)
/ (Address, Lo loc% Ro etc.)
on — J k M C in eta)�C1 N.C.
(Waterbody) (City/Town and/or County)
The applicant has described to me, as shown below, the development proposed at the above
location,
_� I have no objection to this proposal.
I have objections to this proposal.
DESCRIPTION AND/OR DRAWING OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
(Individual proposing development must fill in description below or attach a site drawing)
WAIVER SECTION
I understand that a pier, dock, mooring pilings, boat ramp, breakwater, boathouse, lift, or groin
must be set back a minimum distance of 15' from my area of riparian access unless waived by
me. (If you wish to waive the setback, you must initial the appropriate blank below.)
I do wish to waive the 15' setback requirement.
I do not wish to waive the 15' setback requirement.
(Property Owner Information) (Adjacent Property Owner Infor on)
,�at�fc Y31 V.e4Xr
nature Si alure"67
c%4 L k B. VQ; .RC 1 �; a m!)r ) c"
Print or Type Name Print or Type N me
tob (rr1r�m s+• ��D a .S .
MMailing Address M 'img dress
ew Q6rn N� 2956u �r 9:;00
City/StatelZ' CitWstaatel ip���
252 • bi Is - 41- 00 i2- D - 113Q
Telephone tyumberlemail address Tole hone Numberlemail address
as o aoao 7161 I221
Date Date* RECEIVED
(Revised Aug. 2014)
'Valid for one calendar year after signature' MAR 0 2 2020
.60n
DCM-MHD CITY

I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to CiA�jE ti W t'
property located at JC
's
on TCZ�t -2�vz2 in �w i �2� ,N.C.
(Waterbody) (City/Town and/or County)
The applicant has described to me, as shown below, the development proposed at the above
lt[on.
I have no objection to this proposal.
I have objections to this proposal.
DESCRIPTION AND/OR DRAWING OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
(individual proposing development must fill in description below or attach a site drawing)
S e'e' a++ac.Vxd
WAIVER SECTION
I understand that a pier, dock, mooring pilings, boat ramp, breakwater, boathouse, lift, or groin
must be set back a minimum distance of 15' from my area of riparian access unless waived by
me. (If you wish to waive the setback, you must Initial the appropriate blank below.)
\� I do wish to waive the 15' setback requirement.
I do not wish to waive the 15' setback requirement.
(Property Owner Information)
Aack & Vz4xr
' azure
,%4ck B. Va; 4T
Print or type Name
+D& L'r4van S+-'
Dare
r- 295t:o
31.-(.t.00
•Valid for one calendar year after signature'
(Adjacent Property ner Information)
lur
I (ir�(. S}et�l-un5. C�IV�anaUer
dnt or TT a N me �!
QW 2Y Il
g dress( a nI N)Carb5103
,5 t-G39-a'1t�
Telephone Number/small address
Date*
(Revised Aug.RSIyEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

Cx1598 rcp79
NORTH CAROLINA
CRAVEN COUNTY PREPARED BY THOMAS M. WARD
THIS DEED, made this lath day of September 1997, by and between
Alijenn Properties, Inc., allorth Catalina corporation with a principal office and place of business
in New Bern, Craven County, North Carolina (hereinafter referred to as the "Grantor"). party of
the first part, and Craven County, North Carolina, a body politic and a division of the State of
North Carolina (hereinafter referred to as "Grantee"), whose address is
40d &AVF-N STR.O—r New Bern, Craven County, North Carolina. 29560, perry of
the second part;
W ITNESSETH:
THAT WHEREAS the Grantee is desirous of purchasing certain property from the
Grantor for the construction of a Convention Center in downtown New Bern, North Carolina; and
iEREAS the Grantor is amenable to the sale of said property for the purchase price of Six
s m r tidied Fifty Thousand and No/100 Dollars (S650,000.00) pursuant to certain terms and
m S W
m !^mtditions: and
or : K
t% ¢ Lit WHEREAS it is the intention of the parties that in the event that certain conditions art
Rt met, the Grantor, its successors or assigns shall have the right to re-enter said property. which
I t to re-enter shall entail the reversion of all tille to the property hereinafter described to the
Z amor or its successors and assigns;
o�
�q
NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of Six Hundred Fifty Thousand and NoI100
dlars ($650,000.00) paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged. Grantor
has bargained and by these presents does bargain, grant, soil and convey unto the Grantee, in fee
simple but subject to a condition subsequent, all that certain lot or parcel of land, lying and being
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

cK1588 n080
situate in New Beau Number Eight Township, Craven County, North Carolina, and being more
particularly described as follows:
(See Exhibit A attached hereto)
To have and to bold the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and
appurtenances thereunto belonging to the Grantee, its successors and assigns, in fee simple, but i \
subject to a condition subsequent that construction of said Convention Center be commenced
within two years from the date of the execution of this Deed. For these purposes,
'commencement of construction' shall mean that the design and approval stage of said
Convention Center shall have been completed and ground broken for the actual on -site
construction of the improvements. That further, as a additional condition subsequent. Grantee
shall complete said Convention Center and the same shall be ready for use and occupancy by
March 15, 2001, if the Grantee herein shall fail in the compliance of either of said conditions,
the Grantor, its successors or assigns shall have the right to re-enter and take possession of the
premises, upon payment to Grantee of the sum of Six Hundred Fifty -Thousand and No/too
Dollars ($650,000.00) and all the right title and interest of the Grantee, its successors or assigns
shall revest in the Grantor, its successors or assigns without any further action on the pan of the
Grantee. Exercise of said right to re-enter shall be evidenced by an Affidavit of the Grantor, its
successors or assigns, evidencing a failure of performance of the above -mentioned conditions
subsequent, and the payment of the sum of Six Hundred Fifty Thousand and no1100 Dollars
($650,000), which Affidavit shall be recorded in the Office of the Register of Deeds of Craven
County. Said Affidavit shall also include a notarized statement by a licensed engineer, bearing
his engineering seal, verifying the failure of either of the aforementioned conditions subsequent
2
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

cK:530 rc0ESi
set forth above. Further, in the event that said Affidavit reflecting the Grantor's exercise of its
right to re-enter is not filed in the Office of the Craven County Register of Deeds by March 15.
2004, it shall be conclusively presumed as a matter of record that said right to re-enter has not
been exercised and the same shall terminate.
AND the Grantor, said party of the first part, for itself, its successors and assigns,
covenants to and with the said Grantee, party of the second part, its successors and assigns, that
it is seized of said premises in fee said has the right to convey the same in fee simple subject to
the conditions set forth above; that the same are free and clear of all encumbrances, except time
mentioned above, and that it will warrant and defend the said title to the same against the lawful
claims of all persons whomsoever.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the said Grantor, party of the fast part, has caused this
instrument to be executed under seal and in such form as to be binding, all by authority of its
Board of Directors duly given, the day and yeti fast above written.
ATTEST:
i
SECRETAY.Y
ALIJENN PROPERTIES, INC.
7
r
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

ait1588 PC062
NORTH CAROLINA
CRAVEN COUNTY
This is to certify that on the U I day of may 1997. before me personally
appeared CARY P. Jotmson, with whom I am personally acquainted, who, being by me duly
awom, says:
That he is President and VICEIE J. EINsuESE1, aaat. Secretary of
Ar i,LEw ExoE Ex a-� ration described in and which executed the foregoing instrument;
that he knows the common seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to the foregoing
instrumcnt is said common seal, and the name of the corporation was sibsedbed thereto by the
said President, attested by said Asst. Secretary, and said common seal was affixed,
all by authority duly conferred, and that said instrument is the act and deed of said corporation.
WITNESS, my hard and notarial seal, this 6th day of May
1997.
My commission expires;
AURuet 33, 1998
4
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 ZO
DCM-MHD CITY

BKI'a88 n 0 8 3
NORTH CAROLINA
CRAVEN COUNTY
'fln foregoing certifico g&d.,,1 allotary Public in and
for said County and State: is c#icd to be crcct. This instrument was presented for
registration on this day and hour and duly recorded in t t Office of the Register of Deeds of
Craven County, North Carolina, in'Book /. , at Page f�.
THIS day 1997, at F-4—o'doekom
TlAw/cmd
Attachment
OF DEEDS
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

6a1588 eo004
EXHIBIT A
All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situate in Number Eight Township.
Craven County, North Carolina, in the City of New Bem, and lying at the southwestern
intersection of Tryon Pabtce (hive and Highway 70 East Business, and being more
particularly described w follows: BEOINNING at a point, which point lies the following
courses and distances from the intersection of the northern right-of-way line of Tryon Palace
Drive, with the western fight -of -way line of Highway 70 East Business in downtown New
Bern, next to the Alfred Cunningham Bridge: South 50' 08' 01" West 81.06 feet to the
aforementioned point of beginning; thence from said point of beginning South 10' 1 Y 30'
West 294.86 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 09' 12' 52" West 194.63 feet to an iron pipe,
thence South 46' 44' 36" West 101.84 feet to a point; thence North 88' 1 I' 38" West 38.04
feet to an imn pipe; thence North 43' 02' 18" West 134.17 feet to an Iron pipe; thence North
og' 49' 22" West 211.93 feet to an iron pipe; thence North Or ST 40" East 150.43 feet to
an iron pipe; thence North 82' 07 20" West 58.69 fat to an icon pipe; thence Nosh 07' SY
06" East 1345 feet to an iron pipe in the southern rightof--way line of Tryon Palace Drive;
thence along and with the southern right-of-way line of Tryon Palace Drive South 82' 07'
20" East 79 feet to a point in the western litre of, now or formerly, L.E. Diktel; thence along
and with the Diktel western property line South 07' 3.T40" West 127 feet to a point; thence
along and with the L.E. Diktcl southern property line South 82' 07' 20" East 105 feet to a
point; North 07' 3Y 40" East 127 feet to a concrete monument in the southern rightof-way,
line of Tryon Palace Drive; thence along with southern right-of-way line of Tryon Palace
Drive South 82' 07 20" East 158.06 feet to the aforementioned point of beginning.
Containing 3.036 acres more or less and being a portion of that certain property recorded in
Deed Book 1364, Page 191 of the Craven County Registry to which reference is made.
Subject to casements and restrictions appearing of record.
This land is conveyed subject to certain restrictions so to the use thereof, running with said
land by whomsoever owned, said restrictions which are expressly assented to by the party
of the second part in accepting this Deed being as follows:
I. Said property shall not be used for a hotel, motel, bed and breakfast or other
similar business housing transient overnight guests or boarders; PROVIDED,
however, ibis restriction may be wholly or partly waived by a release of said
covenant from the Grantor herein, its successors or assigns.
2. Said property shall be used pply as a convention center, for a period of two
years following completion of the Convention Centpr, anticipated to be built upon
this property as more particularly described in the Agreement between the Panics
hereto, recorded in Bookz07,Ksnd Page 3a • amended by instrument recorded
in Book IY. Page 4— of the Craven County Registry; PROVIDED,
however, this restriction may be wholly or partially released by the Grantor herein,
its successors or assigns.
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2026
ACM-MHD CITY

46
Form DCM MP-3
UPLAND DEVELOPMENT
(Construction and/or land disturbing activities)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
GENERAL UPLAND DEVELOPMENT
a. Type and number of buildings, facilities, units or structures b. Number of lots or parcels.
proposed. 1
NA
c. Density (give the number of residential units and the units per
acre).
NA
e. If the proposed project will disturb more than one acre of land, the
Division of Land Resources must receive an erosion and
sedimentation control plan at least 30 days before land -disturbing
activity begins.
(i) If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion control plan been
submitted to the Division of Land Resources?
❑Yes ❑No DNA
(ii) If yes, list the date submitted:
g. Give the percentage of the tract within the coastal shoreline AEC to
be covered by impervious and/or built -upon surfaces, such as
pavement, building, rooftops, or to be used for vehicular driveways
or parking.
25%
I. Give the percentage of the entire tract to be covered by impervious
and/or built -upon surfaces, such as pavement, building, rooftops,
or to be used for vehicular driveways or parking.
71.5%
j. Describe proposed method of sewage disposal.
NA. This project is for the renovation of the patio.
I. Describe location and type of proposed discharges to waters of the
state (e.g., surface runoff, sanitary wastewater, industrial/
commercial effluent, "wash down" and residential discharges).
Stormwater is discharged through sheetflow and infiltration
basins.
d. Size of area to be graded, filled, or disturbed including roads,
ditches, etc.
0.53 Acres
f. List the materials (such as marl, paver stone, asphalt, or concrete)
to be used for impervious surfaces.
Concrete, Block, etc.
h. Projects that require a CAMA Major Development Permit may also
require a Stonnwater Certification.
(i) Has a site development plan been submitted to the Division of
Water Quality for review?
®Yes ❑No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, list the date submitted:
Have the facilities described in Item (i) received state or local
approval?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, attach appropriate documentation.
m. Does the proposed project include an innovative stonnwater
design?
❑Yes ®No DNA
If yes, attach appropriate documentabo"RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHC CITY
252-808-28082 :: 1.888-4RCOAST :: www.necoastalmanauement.net revised: 12/26/06

its
AFoYm DCM MP-3 (upland Development, Page 2 of 2)
m. Describe proposed drinking water supply source (e.g.. well,
community, public system, etc.)
NA. Tis project is for the renovation of the patio.
o. When was the lot(s) platted and recorded?
Unknown.
1/29/2020
Date
New Bern Riverfront Convention Center Renovation Phase 2
Project Name
J. Kevin Varnell , Stocks Engineering
Applicant Name
App' ant Signature
n. (i) Will water be impounded? ❑Yes ENO ❑NA
(ii) If yes, how many acres?
If proposed development is a subdivision, will additional utilities be
installed for this upland development?
[]Yes []No ENA
DECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
CCM-MHD CITY
232-808.2808 n 1.8884RCOAST :: v w nccoastalmanaaement.net revised: 12/26/06

ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER STATEMENT
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to _ QL� �� ( (Ulu) j) Becr�"'s
Property located at (Name�f'rqparty Owner)
..�r (t�
/ (Address, Lo loc , Road, etc.)
on in N.C.
(Waterbody) (City/Town and/or County)
The applicant has described to me, as shown below, the development proposed at the above
IocatioD
I have no objection to this proposal.
I have objections to this proposal.
DESCRIPTION AND/OR DRAWING OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
(Individual proposing development must fill in description below or attach a site drawing)
WAIVER SECTION
1 understand that a pier, dock, mooring pilings, boat ramp, breakwater, boathouse, lift, or groin
must be set back a minimum distance of 15' from my area of riparian access unless waived by
me. (If you wish to waive the setback, you must initial the appropriate blank below.)
I do wish to waive the 15' setback requirement.
I do not wish to waive the 15' setback requirement.
(Property Owner Information)
A!r f )3. V,4,,r
nature
Jac k. (3• VQ, tzr
Print or Type Name
}bib Cr4vem S+
Mailing Address
eJew Qom- NZIS&O
b-6boo
Telephone umber/email address
oa%4 /aoao
Dare
*Valid for one calendar year after signature'
(Adjacent Property Owner
Print or
K��1(,1ZJ1:i? Ma.(;tea. rnaw rurgGK; l{o� . cow
1'e�leyioniN�u�mbber email address %
DareRECOVEr;
(Revised Aug. 2014)
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

JACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER STATEMENT
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to C2A�jE N+ W t'n�J s
(Name of Property Owner)
property located at Jo 3 SO F 20 N i S i Zt
(Address, Lot, Blgck, Road, etc.)
on TCZe�T 2,V¢Z ,in N�:� -1S�R"N.C.
(Waterbody) (City/Town and/or County)
The applicant has described to me, as shown below, the development proposed at the above
loc t'on.
I have no objection to this proposal.
I have objections to this proposal.
DESCRIPTION AND/OR DRAWING OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
(Individual proposing development must fill In description below or attach a site drawing)
Set, w++ixbxJ
WAIVER SECTION
I understand that a pier, dock, mooring pilings, boat ramp, breakwater, boathouse, lift, or groin
must be set back a minimum distance of 15' from my area of riparian access unless waived by
me. (If you wish to waive the setback, you must Initial the appropriate blank below.)
\� I do wish to waive the 15' setback requirement.
I do not wish to waive the 15' setback requirement.
(Property Owner Information) (Adjacent Pi
AVIC 1O 15, V.e4Xr
azure
ijack t3• Vc. � p>
Print or 709 Name dnt or T 1
tOb Crgvem
Mailing Address g dre
A)e W 8,2 N C 2951.0
Clty/Sfate/Z! fy/Stete/Zip
nl
252 -P.3r.-taboo
Telephone umber/emag address Telephone NL
Da a4laaa.o
Date•
'Valid for one calendar year after signature'
Information)
N) , A510
(Revised Augg`%7J(VE
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FOR CAMA PERMIT APPLICATION
Name of Property Owner Requesting Permit: L:rAV /CvA 'CC)"x..�
Mailing Address: �4L C.fAJCrn S
Phone Number: �✓Z. b 3Co . b ("o
Email Address:
I certify that I have authorized 17A1
Agentl Contractor
to act on my behalf, for the purpose of applying for and obtaining all CAMA permits
necessary for the following proposed development: �a' c .� OrJ ✓l
at my property located at
in CM County.
1 furthermore certify that 1 am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to
Division of Coastal Management staff, the Local Permit Officer and their agents to enter
on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application.
Property Owner Information:
Aak P. ✓.' s
Signature
�Ack /3 • VQi4-=
Print or Type Name
Coun�'V /VlQ►tAgGr
Title
oa I o 4 1 aoao
Date
/ RECEIVED
This certification is valid through OZ / d`i 1 ZUZ
MAR 0 2 2020
CCM-MHD CITY

Land Owner Consent. The City of New Bern, as the landowner of the Greenway
Area along the New Bern waterfront, hereby provides consent for Craven County and
Stocks Engineering to file permits on behalf of the New Bern Convention Center and
it's connections with the existing New Bern owned greenway along the property
frontage on the Trent River in conjunction with the proposed plans.
zq JAOAD
M9
Date type or Priht Name
-XIDD a5a- to3q a8 �
Telephone
Wbe
Email
Fax Title
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
ACM-MHD CITY

:r1588 �:073
NORTH CAROLINA
CRAVEN COUNTY PREPARED BY THOMAS M. WARD
THIS DEED, made this loch day of September 1997, by and between
Alijenn Properties, Inc., allorth Carolina corporation with a principal office and place of business
in New Bern, Craven County, North Carolina (hereinafter referred to as the "Grantor"). party of
the first part, and Craven County, North Carolina, a body politic and a division of the State of
/'
North Carolina (hereinafter referred to a"Grantee"), whose address is
464 &AVEN STRw-T New Bem, Craven County, North Carollna. 29560. parry of
the second pan;
W ITNESS ETH:
THAT WHEREAS the Grantee is desirous of purchasing certain property from the
Grantor for the construction of a Convention Center in downtown New Bern, North Carolina; and
{EREAS the Grantor is amenable to the sale of said property for the purchase price of Six
u
s m . ndred Fifty Tbousand and No/100 Dollars ($650,000.00) purwant to certain tam and
N
" 0 W y, ld1t1D0a; and
r) m N
taj ¢ W WHEREAS it is the intention of the parties that in the event that certain conditions are
met, the Grantor, its successors or assigns shell have the right to re-enter said property, which
ht to re-enter shall entail the reversion of all title to the property hereinafter described to the
antor or its successors and assigns;
NOWTHEREFORF, for and in consideration of Six Hundred Fifty Thousoncl and NoI100
Jlars ($650,000.00) paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor
has bargained and by these presents does bargain, grant, sell and convey unto the Gmntec, in fee
simple but subject to a condition subsequent, all that certain lot or parcel of hutd, lying and being
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

LK.588 730e0
situate in New Bent, Number Eight Township, Craven County, North Carolina, and being more
particularly described as follows:
(See Exhibit A attached hereto)
To have and to hold the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and
appurtenances thereunto belonging to the Grams, its successors and assigns, in fee simple, but
subject to a condition subsequent that construction of said Convention Center be commenced
within two years from the date of the execution of this Dead. For these purposes,
'commencement of construction' shall mean that the design and approval stage of said
Convention Center "I have been completed and ground broken for the actual on -site
construction of the improvements. That further, as a additional condition subsequent. Grantee
shall complete said Convention Center and the same shall be ready for use and occupancy by
March 15. 2001. if the Grantee herein shall fail in the compliance of either of said conditions,
the Grantor, is successon or assigns shall have the right to reenter and take possession of the
premises, upon payment to Grantee of the aunt of Six Hundred Fifty -Thousand and No/10O
Dollars ($650,000.00) and all the right title and interest of the Grantee, is successors or assigns
shall revert in the Grantor, its successon or assigns without any further action on the part of the
Grantee. Exercise of said right to re-enter shall be evidenced by an Affidavit of the Grantor, its
successors or assigns. evidencing a failure of performance of the above -mentioned conditions
subsequent, and the payment of the sum of Six Hundred Fifty Thousand and no/100 Dollars
(5650.000), which Affidavit shall be recorded in the Office of the Register of Deeds of Craven
County. Said Affidavit shall also include a notarized statement by a licensed engineer, hearing
his engineering seal, verifying the failure of either of the aforementioned COnditinna subsequent
3
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

x1538 rc081
set forth above. Further, in the event that said AttSdavit reflecting the Grantor's exercise of its
right to re-enter is not filed in the Office of the Craven County Register of Deeds by March 15,
2004, it shall be conclusively presumed as a matter of record that said right to re-enter has not
been exercised and the same shall terminate.
AND the Grantor, said party of the first part, for itself, its suc:esson and assigns,
covenants to and with the said Grantee, party of the second part, its successors and assigns, that
it is seized of said premises in fee and has the right to convey the same in fee simple subject to
the conditions set forth above; that the same are free and clear of all encumbrances, except those
mentioned above, and that it will warrant and defend the said title to the same against the lawful
claims of all persons whomsoever.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the said Grantor, party of the first part, has caused this
instrument to be executed under seal and in such form as to be binding, all by authority of its
Board of Directors duly given, the day and year first above written.
ATTEST:
SECRETPYY
ALIJENN PROPERTIES, INC.
By
(DENT
3
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

6K1586 Pc062
NORTH CAROLINA
CRAVEN COUNTY
This is to certify that on the 6en day of Lax_ , 1997, before me personally
appeared GART P. JotmsoN, with whom I am personally acquainted, who, being by me duty
sworn, says:
KIN E%RL
That he is President and VICEIE J. na Aaac. Secretary of
A+InENN PROPERTIEs,W�tporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument;
that he knows the common seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to the foregoing
katrumem is said common seal. and the name of the corporation was 9'ibscribed thereto by the
said President, attested by said Asst. Secretary, and said common seal was affixed,
all by authority duly conferred, and that said instrument is the act and deed of said corporation.
WITNESS, my hand and notarial seal, this 6th day of May
1997.
ii4[/ua1J�uJ-9r`1� TAR
t�STARY BLiC � � .�° r ; i
;i
My commission =pit= iy Puaso;.' e
'ii,,rrN Q'oUN```•c
August 23, 1998
4
DECEIVE©
MAR 0 2 2020
nCM -MHD CITY

=KI-9aa ac003
NORTH CAROLINA
CRAVEN COUNTY
T7tc fomgoing ccrtifica allotary Public in and
for said County and State. is c$r icd to be rrect. This instrument was presented for
registration on this day and hour and duly recorded in t Office of the Register of Deeds of
Craven County, North Carolina, in Book 1,W , at Page 17Y
TIES day A/% 1997, at p-&O'clock&m
TMW/cmd
Attachment
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
nCM-MHD CITY"

e41588 ec004
EXHIBIT A
All that certain tractor parcel of land lying and being situate in Number Eight Township,
Craven County, North Carolina, in the City of New Bem, and lying at the southwestern
intersection of Tryon Palace Drive and Highway 70 East Business, and being more
particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point, which point lies the following
courses and distances from the intersection of the northern right-of-way line of Tryon Palace
Drive, with the western right-of-way line of Highway 70 East Business in downtown New
Bern, next to the Alfred Curmingham Bridge: South 50" OS' 01" West 81.06 feet to the
aforementioned point of beginning, thence from said point of beginning South 10" 13' 30"
West 294.86 feet to an imn pipe; thence South 09" IT 52" West 194.63 feet to an iron pipe,
thence South 46" 44' 36" West 101.84 feet to a point; thence North 98" I F 38" West 38.04
feet to an iron pipe; thence North 43" 02' 18" West 134.17 feet to an iron pipe; thence North
08' 49' 22" West 211.93 feet to an iron pipe; thence North 07° ST 40" East 150.43 feat to
an iron pipe; thence North 82" 07 20" West 59.69 feet to an iron pipe; thence North 07" 53'
06" Fast 134.5 feet to an iron pipe In the southern right-of-way line of Tryon Palace Drive,
thence along and with the southern right-of-way line of Tryon Palace Drive South 82" 07'
20" East 79 feet to a point in the western line of, now or formerly, L.E. Diktel; thence along
and with the Mittel western property line South 07" 35' 40" West 127 feet to a point; thence
along and with the L.E. Diktcl southern property line South 82" 0T 20" East 105 feet to a
point; North 07" 35' 40" East 127 feet to a concrete monument in the southern right-of-way
line of Tryon Palace Drive; thence along with southern right-of-way line of Tryon Palsoe
Drive South 82" 07 20" East 158.06 feet to the aforementioned point of beginning.
Containing 3.036 acres more or less and being a portion of that certain property recorded in
Deed Book 1364, Page 181 of the Craven County Registry to which reference is made.
Subject to easements and restrictions appearing of record.
This Iond is conveyed subject to certain restrictions as to the on thereof, running with said
lard by whomsoever owned, said restrictions which are expressly assented to by the pony
of the second pan in accepting this Deed being as follows:
I. Said property shall not be used for a hotel, motel, bed and breakfast or other
similar business housing transient overnight guests or boarders; PROVIDED,
however, this restriction may be wholly or partly waived by a release of said
covenant from the Grantor herein, its successors or assigns.
2. Said property shall be used putty as a convention center, for a period of two
years following completion of the Convention Centt:r, anticipated to be built upon
this property as more pancularly described in the Agreement between the panics
hereto, recorded in Bwk/d —,Kwd Page --rr, amended by instrument recorded
in Book 157Y. Page ...J.L of the Craves County Registry; PROVIDED,
however, this restriction may be wholly or partially released by the Grantor herein,
its successors or assigns.
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

•
ENGINEERING
De&LO.L.O tNe Fut M' TDdaa
Site Location
203 S. Front St. New Bern, NC 28560.
From US HWY 70 East take E Front Street to the North across the Trent River. Turn left onto S. Front
Street and the destination is immediately on the Left.
Project Description
The existing New Bern Riverfront Convention Center is enlarging their outdoor patio space. Stocks
Engineering is contracted with the Oakley Collier Architects for the civil engineering aspects of the design
and permitting process. The proposed multi -level patio will increase the amount of impervious surface on
the site and two infiltration basins are proposed to treat the increased impervious area.
Stormwater Management Plan
The onsite soil consists of loamy sand to sand. The soil is Seabrook -Urban land complex (A Soils)
Soils information was obtained through the NRCS website:
http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/ for Wake County.
The site currently drains directly into the Trent River which is a tributary to the Neuse River.
The proposed site improvements increase the onste impervious area 2,274.28 SF. The site design
provides two small infiltration basins that will treat 5,838.38 SF of total drainage area, 5,553.9 SF of which
is impervious. The infiltration basins trap the 1.5 - INCH storm and allows the runoff to infiltrate the natural
ground at a rate of 1.1 IN/HR.
Post -development runoff is less than pre -development because of the addition of the infiltration basins.
The impervious area that will drain into the existing stormwater control measures was reduced by
3,279.62 SF.
CAMA Specific Narrative
The project involves removing large amounts of impervious areas in the 75 AEC area and locating
them closer to the building to create a more useable patio area for the convention center. The
current patio and sidewalk configurations do not allow the wise use of this space. The project will
locate a larger and flatter patio area adjacent to the building while removing sidewalk scattered
around the yard.
The Total 75' AEC area onsite is 23,225 SF. There is 8,329 SF of Existing Impervious in the Total
75' AEC Area. Approximately 5,161 SF of Existing Impervious is being removed and 3,850 is being
replaced within the 75' AEC Area. This results in a final impervious area reduction of 1,311 SF
within the AEC area or a total impervious of 7,018 SF (30.2%) The total disturbance in the 75' AEC
Area is 15,568 SF. This is largely due to the large areas of impervious being removed and the need
to grade these areas after completion. Silt fence will be used to control and retain the sediment
onsite.
The area just in the 30' CAMA Buffer will have 806 SF removed and 248 SF of imperviouREGENED
back. The total disturbance within just this area is 4,159 SF.
MAR 0 6 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

The area just in the 50' NCDEQ Buffer will have the 806 SF removed as discussed in the 30' Buffer
area above plus an additional 1,563 SF in the outer 20' for a total of 2,369 SF. The total proposed
impervious to be added back to this area is 550 SF. The total disturbance in this area is 16,634 SF.
As this project has to connect to the waterfront boardwalk, the project will impact to within 12.5' of
the NHW line (Bulkhead). There are no wetlands onsite. The proposed design includes the use of
Sand Filters for Stormwater treatment. These sand filters capture more area than is required and
allows for more treatment than the current conditions onsite.
Short term impacts include the removal of the existing sidewalk and the associated grading.
Long term impacts would include the replacement of the sidewalk although at a much lower surface
area than the existing site.
Existing Known Permits
SW 7020712
RECEIVED
MAR 0 6 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Envlr n enrafQuatfty
January 21, 2020
County of Craven
Attention: Mr. Jack B. Veit, III, Manager
406 Craven Street
New Bern, NC 2856OA971
Subject: Stormwater Permit No. SW7000926 Renewal
Craven County Convention Center
High Density Stormwater Project
Dear Mr. Veit: Craven County
A Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources file review has determined that
Stormwater Permit SW7000926 for a stormwater treatment system consisting of a wet
detention pond and a Facet International oil/water separator to serve the Craven County
Convention Center located at 203 South Front Street in New Bern, NC expires on July
6, 2020. This is a reminder that permit renewal applications are due 180 days prior to
expiration. We do not have a record of receiving a renewal application.
To keep this permit active please submit a completed permit renewal application along
with a $505.00 fee for permit renewal. Permit application forms for renewal can be found
on our website at:
https:/fdeq.nc gpv/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-resources/energy-mineral-land-
rulesfstormwater-12rogram/post-construction. North Carolina General Statutes and the
Coastal Stormwater rules require that this property be covered under a stormwater
permit.
If you have questions, please feel free to contact me at [phone]. 1 will be glad to
discuss this by phone or meet with you. If you would like, I can e-mail you a copy of the
application forms. You can request a copy by e-mailing me at ro eg r.thorpeftcdenr.gov.
Sincerely,
601
Roger K. Thorpe
Environmental Engineer
D_EQJ� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
l Washington Regional Office 1943 Washington Square Mall I Washington, North Carolina 27889
�^^� 252.946.6481

r
Michael F. Eavley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.B. Director
Division of Water Quality
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 6, 2006
County of Craven
Attn: Mr. Harold Blizzard
PO Box 1713
New Bern, NC 28563
Subject:, Stormwater Permit Renewal SW7000926
Craven Convention Center
High Density Stormwater Project
Craven County
Dear Mr. Blizzard:
The Washington Regional Office received your request for
renewal of the subject permit on April 11, 2006. We are
forwarding Permit No. SW7000926 dated July 6, 2006, to Craven
County for the continued operation of (2) stormwater control
systems to serve the Craven Convention Center located at New Bern,
NC.
This permit replaces all previous stormwater permits for this
site, and shall be effective from the date of issuance until July
6, 2016, and shall be subject to the conditions and limitations as
specified therein. Please pay special attention to the Operation
and Maintenance requirements in this permit. Failure to establish
an adequate system for operation and maintenance of the stormwater
management system will result in future compliance problems.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this
permit are unacceptable, you have the right to request an
adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days
following receipt of this permit. This request must be in the
form of a written petition, conforming_ to Chapter 150B of the
North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of
Administrative Hearings, P.O. Drawer 27447, Raleigh, NC 27611-
7447. Unless such demands are made this permit shall be final and
binding.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Internet: vvww ncwateroualitv.ors One
943 Washington Square Mall Phone [phone] NorthCarolina
Washing"on, NC 27889 Fax [phone] Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmailve Action Employer - 50% Recycled/1 0% Post Consumer Paper

County of Craven
July 6, 2006
Page Two
If you have any questions, or. need additional information
concerning this matter, please contact Bill Moore at (252) 948-
3919.
Xin,cerle y,
Y
Al Ho g 1 Seruperviso
Surface Water Protection Section
Washington Regional Office
cc: City of New Bern Planning/Inspections
v4ashington Regional Office
Central Files

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW7000926
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION.OF WATER QUALITY
STATE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT
HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143,
General Statutes of North Carolina as amended, and other
applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
County. of Craven
Craven County
FOR THE
continued operation and maintenance of _stormwater management
system;; in compliance with the provisions of 15A .NCAC 2H.1000
(hereafter referred to as the "stormwater rules") and the approved
stcrmwater management plans and specifications and other
,quppott:i.ng data as attached and on file with and approved by the
Divisioi. of Water Quality and considered a part of this permit for
wet detention pond, and (1) innovative stormwater treatment
system consisting of a pretreatment wet detention basin,
;:ibsurfa:e pipe detention, and a Facet International oil/water
separator to serve the Craven County Convention Center located at
Now Beta, NC.
pet.,lit replaces F.11 previous stormwater permits for this
site, and shall be effective from the date of issuance until July
2016, and .shall be subject to the following specified
cor:.'..ita,)ns and limitations:
T DESIGN STANOAPDS
This permit i!: effective only with respect to the nature and
volume of ?l:o):mwater described in the application and other
r,upporting data.
This e•.tc,r:nwat.nr system has been approved for the management
of st.oxriwate� runoff as described on pages 4 6 5 of this
pe mnit, the Project Data Sheets.
and specifications for this project are
i.n<;orpo,ataid Ly reference and are enforceable parts of the
nermi t..

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PROJECT DATA
Project Name:
Craven County Convention Center
Permit Number:
SW7000926
Location:
Craven County
Applicant:
County of Craven
Mailing.Address:
PO Box 1713
New Bern, NC 28563
Application Date:
04/11/2006; renewal request
Receiving Stream:
Trent River
Stream Classification:
SS -NSW
Total Site Area:
4.58 acres
Total Impervious:
2.75 acres - South Basin
0.50 acres - North Basin
Pond Depth:
6.5 ft - South Pond
3.5 ft - North Pond
Required Storage Volume:
9606 cf - South Pond
1833 cf - North Pond
Provided Storage volume: 11,500 cf - South Pond
2091 cf - North Pond
*(provided storage includes wet pond & pipe detention system)
Required Surface Area: 5688 sf - South Pond
2264 sf - North Pond
Provided Surface Area: 780 sf - South Pond.**
2309 sf - North Pond
**(South wet pond serves as pretreatment pond only)
Controlling Orifice: 2.0-inch dia. - South Pond
1.0-inch dia. - North Pond
4

r
Project:Data Continued
Stormwater runoff from the south drainage basin shall be
collected by a system of catch basins and piped to a multi -
component system which consist of (4) separate structures. The
(4) component system was originally designed to provide 90% TSS
removal and was permitted as an innovative system. A description
of the treatment system and the design specifications follows:
(1) Wet Detention Pond:
780 sf surface area; 1500 cf of storage volume to elevation
5.5; planted with wetland vegetation; by design this pond
will function as a pretreatment settling pond and should
provide significant removal prior to entering the subsurface
pipe detention system.
(2) Control Structure:
concrete structure that directs one -inch design storm to
subsurface pipe detention system; provides bypass weir at
elevation 5.5.
(3) Subsurface pipe detention system:
60-inch corrugated steel pipe system with sediment baffles;
provides 8000 cf storage between elevations 2.0 and 5.5;
releases design storm through 2-inch adjustable orifice
plate; although significant sediment removal will likely
occur, no credit or allowance for TSS removal has been
assigned for this component of the system.
(4.) Oil/Water Separator:
proprietary unit manufactured by Facet Internationl; equipped
with (5) filtering packs designed to provide 90% TSS & Oil
removal at a flow rate of 87 gpm; (5) additional filtering
packs can be added to this unit if necessary to provide
additional treatment.

h
4. No homeowner/lot owner/developer shall be allowed to fill in,
alter, or pipe any vegetative practices (such as swales)
shown on the approved plans as part of the stormwater
management system without submitting a revision to the permit
and receiving approval from the Division.
5. The following items will require a modification to the
permit:
a. Any revision to the approved plans, regardless of size
b. Project name change
C. Transfer of ownership
d. Redesign or addition to the approved amount of built -
upon area
e. Further subdivision of the project area.
In addition, the Director may determine that other revisions
to the project should require a modification to the permit.
6. The Director may notify the permittee when the permitted site
does not meet one or more of the minimum requirements of the
permit. Within the time frame specified in the notice, the
permittee shall submit a written time schedule to the
Director for modifying the site to meet minimum requirements.
The permittee shall provide copies of revised plans and
certification in writing to the Director that the changes
have been made.
II. SCHEDULE OF COMPLIANCE
1. The permittee will comply with the following schedule for
construction and maintenance of the stormwater management
system.
a. The stormwater management system shall be constructed
in its entirety, vegetated and operational for its
intended use prior to the construction of any built -
upon surfaces except roads.
b. During construction, erosion shall be kept to a minimum
and any eroded areas of the system will be repaired
immediately.
2. The facilities must be properly maintained and operated at
all times. The approved Operation and Maintenance Plan must
be followed in its entirety and maintenance must occur at the
scheduled intervals.
3. The permittee shall at all times provide the operation and
maintenance necessary to assure the permitted stormwater
system functions at optimum efficiency including, but not
limited to:

i
a. Semiannual scheduled inspections (every 6 months)
b. Sediment removal
C. Mowing and revegetation of side slopes
d. Immediate repair of eroded areas
e. Maintenance of side slopes in accordance with approved
plans and.specifications
f. Debris removal and unclogging of outlet structure,
orifice device and catch basins and piping.
4. Records of maintenance activities must be kept and made
available upon request to authorized personnel of DWQ. The
records will indicate the date, activity, name of person
performing the work and what actions were taken.
5. This permit shall become voidable unless the facilities. are
constructed in accordance with the conditions of this permit,
the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting
data.
6. Upon completion of construction and prior to operation of
this permitted facility, a certification must be received
from an appropriate designer for the system installed
certifying that the permitted facility has been installed in
accordance with this permit, the approved plans and
specifications, and other supporting documentation. Mail the
Certification to the Washington Regional Office, 943
Washington Square Mail, Washington, North Carolina, 27889,
attention Division of Water Quality.
7. A copy of the approved plans and specifications shall be
.maintained on file by the Permittee for a minimum of five
years from the date of the completion of construction.
III. GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. This permit is not transferable. In the event there is a
desire for the facilities to change ownership, or there is a
name change of the Permittee, a formal permit request must be
submitted to the Division of Water Quality accompanied by an
application fee, documentation from the parties involved, and
other supporting materials as may be appropriate. The
approval of this request will be considered on its merits and
may or may not be approved.
2. Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained
in this permit may subject the Permittee to enforcement
action by the Division of Water Quality, in accordance with
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6(a) to 143-215.6(c).
The issuance of this permit does not preclude the Permittee
from complying with any and all statutes, rules, regulations,
or ordinances which may be imposed by other government
agencies (local, state, and federal) which have jurisdiction.
7

4. In the event that the facilities . fail to perform
satisfactorily, including the creation of nuisance
conditions, the Permittee shall take immediate corrective
action, including those as may be required by this Division,
such as the construction of additional or replacement
stormwater management systems.
5. The permit may be modified, revoked and reissued or
terminated for cause. The filing of a request for a permit
modification, revocation and reissuance or termination does
not stay any permit condition.
6. The permittee shall submit a written request to the Division
of Water Quality, Washington Regional Office, for renewal of
this permit at least 6 months prior to the expiration date.
Permit issued this the 6 th day of July, 2006.
NORTH,CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
ea all vv. ix -Lime x, r. n. Ulrecror
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the -Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number SW7000926
0

I SEE CV2307.pdf -- Additional Documentation and Boundary Expansion (2003) for a complete inventory of this original district area I
X
Far. 1".300 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
STATE:
(R". 6.72) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
North Carolina
COUNTY:
NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
Craven
INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM
FOR NPS USE ONLY
ENTRY—DATC
(Type, all entries complete applicable sections)
q ""%,I L 777777
Cokiv.014:
New Bern Historic District
ANDIor, HISTORIC:
See location 2
F—CITV OR TOWN:—
CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT: Krst
Raw Bern
The Hon. Walter B. Jones
STATE
CODE
COUNTY: CODE
North Carolina
Craven
37
CATEGORY
(ch.cf, a..)
OWNERSHIP
STATUS
ACCESSIBLE
TO THE PUBLIC
Xj Dist'i
l District 0 Building
0 Politic
Public Acquisition:
M occupied
yes:
C] Sila El Structure
0 PrN.I.
❑ In Process
0 Unoccupied
R Restricted
0 object
[7)q Both
❑ Being Considered
KI Preservation work
0 Unrestricted
in progress
No
C1 Agricultural Governm-ni Park )9j Transportation ❑ C......1,
N Commercial ❑ Industrial PdYcrtm Residence Ej Other (Specify)
t5g Ed ... It ... I ❑ Military Religious
f„i E.1,mimm,ol ID Museum E3 scientific
i V R OPE RTY 77-7,�M7N'
V R' 5 NAME:
Various owners
0
TTiEul' AND NUMOefl!
1;11'r on TOWN
STATE:ODF
0
L- A TIP M Q
COURIIAOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS. ETC!
0
0
Lqr-aven County Courthouse
Fj
2 C
5y,-,VET AND NUMDER%
CITY OR T01Y14:
STATE
CODE
NEW Bern
North Carotin
37
1
E NG SUPVEYS,
��TfOli j.,4
L 8XISt)
ri rLC OF SURVEY:
.c an Bi
[ILLS feria Amari ngs
_SSuLvt3L___
ID.1 S OF5J.4vry: 01.1s
.01-is 1930s
5d F.Js,.t
0 state 0 County ty
(D Local I
0
M
'E� OS
EPOLITOR" FOR SURVLY RCCORCIS:
z
r--L4i�brary of Con—ess
I. 1 �.T n140 NUII.Ck:
ill
7,-qt Canitol arl --i Ir d e-jandence
Avenue
ol
C i, I OWI:
TATE:
ODE
ISDi C,

Foml 10.700. U1•I' E,'. S' 7ES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR sYATF
(Jnly 1969) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE North Carolina
NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES COUNTY
Craven _
INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM FOR NPS U_SE ONLY
ENTRY NUIeb ER UATE
(Continuation Sheet)
(A'umhnr o(1 anbine)
Location 2.
Beginning at Union Point, at the confluence of the Reuse and Trent
rivers; going north then northwest along the west shore of the P;euse River to
and including Queen Street; going southwest along Queen Street taking in land
and buildings on the northwest side of the street, to and including Metcalf
Street; going south along Metcalf Street taking in land and buildings on the
west side of the street, to and including Broad Street; going west along
Broad Street taking in land and buildings on tha north side o£,the street, to
and including Fleet Street; going south along Fleet Street t_dcing in land and
buildings on the west side of the street to and including Pollock Street;
going east along Pollock Street, taking in land and buildings on the south
side of the street to and including Eden Street; south along Eden Street,
taking in land and buildings on the west side of the street, to the north
shora of the Trent River; east along the Trent River, following the various
irregularities of the wharves and docks along the shoreline, to the point of
beginning.
B-0 921-72e•

r (cnnu: ono)
Excelle nl ]: Good [gj Fair ❑ DO.H.,.red ❑ Rol.. ❑ Unnxp.s.d
CONDITION ( --
(Check Gn o) (Chock Ono)
Ahemd 0 Unollered ❑ Mnvad Original Siln
M RISE THE PRESENT ANO ORAy NAL ((a R own) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE
The architecture of New Bern reflects the history of the town, which
has had sustained prosperity and which historically has been subject and
receptive to major architectural trends. Although Federal architectura was
New Bern's special forte, a variety of other styles are represented. The
minor streets are quiet, punctuated by buildings set on large well-landscapE d
lots shaded by stately trees dotted with clumps of mistletoe. Adding
serenity to the town are the Neuse and Trent rivers which provide a magnif-
icent backdrop. This atmosphere prevailed throughout Now Berm until the
early 1950s when Broad Street became a major east -west artery, cleaving the
city in two.
I -Then the city was established in 1710, at the request of Baron von
Gra£fenried, John Lawson devised and laid out the plan which with some
additions remains intact. He explains:
Since in America they do not like to live crowded, in order to enjoy
a purer air, I accordingly ordered the streets to be very broad and
the houses well separated one from the other. I marked three acres
of land for each family, for house, barn, garden, orchard, hemp
field, poultry yard and other purposes. I divided the village like
a cross and in the middle I intended a church. One of the principal
streets extended from the bank of the River Neuse straight on into
the forest [Broad or Pollock Street] and the other principal street
crossed it, running from the Trent River clear to the house River
[Paddle or Craven Street]. After that we planted stakes to mark the
houses and to make the principal streets along and on the banks of
the two rivers [East Front Street and South Front Street (now Tryon
Palace Drive)].
Not only did the street scheme survive, but the idea. of not lilting to "live
crowded" is still in evidence. With the exception of construction accom-
plished since the mid -twentieth century and four mid -nineteenth century
row houses, all residences are separate free-standing buildings, each with
a generous yard.
Historically New Bern has been dependent for its livelihood on its
rivers and on governmental sponsorship. The city's role as occasional hoot
of the itinerant colonial assembly, the colony's first permanent capital,
and the seat of Craven County helped foster her emergence as a.port and
therefore as a mercantile center. Shortly before the Revolution, Governor
Josiah Martin observed
It is true . the Town of Beaufort, is advantageously situated
for commerce, but there are no persons of condition or subUahce in
it, and the Trade that was formerly carried on through that channel,
is now derived almost entirely to this Totm [flew Bern], since it
became the seat of government, which has promoted its growth exceedi
IT inviting many considerable Merchants to settle in it.
Because of New Be.rn's externally oriented econo:=L, the city was exposed to
national stylistic trends which quitvr obviously hd a great affect on her
W
m
m
a
u,
;o

Form 10-300o UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TIIE INTERIOR IsTA
(July 1969) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE N
NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES COUNTY
Craven
INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM FOR NPS USE ONLY
(Continuation Sheet) ENTRY NUMBER DATE
7. A
architecture. The vast majority of her structures express a high degree of
academicism successfully rendered by skilled and sensitive craftsmen.
Nothing remains of the earliest buildings. A comparison of New Bern
today with what C. J. Sauthier recorded on his 1769 map of the town finds
only four buildings which tentatively are identified as surviving from that
time. (Tryon Palace, most of which is.a reconstruction accomplished in the
1950s, is not included in this figure.)
William Attmore saw the town in 1787 and provided the following descrip-
tion of the buildings:
There are[,] to many of the houses[,] Balconies or Piazzas in front
and sometimes back of the house, this Method of Building is found
convenient on account of the great Summer Heats here --These Balconies
are often two.Stories high, sometimes one or both ends of it [them]
are boarded up, and made into a Room.
Within the district, fourteen buildings with Georgian stylistic origins
ha.va been identified. The majority of them are simple, modest d::ellinga anal
most were up -dated during a later stylistic era. The surviving Georgian
buildings are:
Brinson House, 213 Johnson -Street
House, 217 Hancock Street
Mary Hatch Harrison PIouse, 219 New Street
Elijah Clark House, 619 Middle Street
House, 713 Pollock Street
Dr. Forbes House and Office, 715-717 Pollock Street
House, 726 Pollock Street
Coor-Gaston House, 421 Craven Street
Coor-Bishop House, 501 East Front Street
Jobn Wright Stanly House, 307 George Street
Hawks House, 306 Hancock Street
Srd th-Whitford House, 506 Craven Street
Major James-Daves House, 313 George Street
York -Gordon House, 213 Hancock Street
This is a scant number considering that more than thirty house carpentors
and/or joiners are known to have been working in the county betaa en 1748 and
1790. With the exception of a few houses attributed either to John Hawks
or to James Coor, the architect -builders of most buildia.-s cannot ba identi-
£:i.;�i. It can be assumed that natural attrition combined with disasters lika
tha hurricane of September, 1769, and thr fires in the fall of 1'191 and 1794,
c.nd that of February, 1798, which burned the Covernor's Palace, eradicated
Tu3ch of the evidence of the early towm.
CPU 9.I.Ien

F. M 10-300a UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR lc;rlav�e�n
TArE0.1y 1969) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE ortC!-.7.
rNATIONAL REGISTER OF IiISTORIC PLACES
INVENTORY -NOMINATION FORM nc
(Confinnolion Shoal)
(N.nb., ell antd..)
7. B
I ENTRY NUrARER I DATE I
Within the last two decades of the eighteenth century the population of
NEW Bern more than doubled, and the physical area of the town accordingly
expanded north and wrest. Judging from remaining evidence, growth of the
population and area continued in the first decades of the nineteenth century.
Obviously the town was enjoying a new high level of prosperity --a prosperity
based on commercial and mercantile endeavors which enabled affluent merchants
like John Harvey, Eli Smallwood, and Isaac Taylor to build ambitious town
houses. It was during this same era of prosperity that the town produced
civic and cultural symbols of urbanity, most notably the New Bern Academy,
the Masonic Temple and Theater and the First Presbyterian Church.
The New Bern version of Federal architecture is Adamesque; it is re-
strained and elegant and, above all, sophisticated. A typical Federal
domestic structure has the following elements: two -and -one-half stories;
a side -hall plan, two rooms deep (three bays wide and four bays deep); a
gable roof; gable dormers; exposed -face interior end chimneys; a one -bay
pedimented porch; an entrance composed of a six -panel door (four flat above
two flush panels) with geometrically ornamented transom. above. Although
interior treatments vary considerably, three-part mantels are univeroal.
The following buildings generally adhere to those characteristics:
Bryan House and Office, 605 Pollock Street
Eli Smallwood House, 524 East Front Street
Benjamin Smith House, 210 Hancock Street
Stevenson Houses 609 Pollock Street
Isaac Taylor House, 228 Craven Street
Eubank House, 218 Broad Street
Leech House, 209 Change Street (formerly on west corner of East Front
and Linden streets)
IIouse, 231 Change Street
House, 125 Craven Street
Stevenson House, 413 Craven Street
House, 223 Craven Street
Jonee-Jarvis house, 528 East Front Street
Eleanor Marshall House, 227 Eden Street
Gull Harbor, 514 East Front Street
House, 419 Metcalf Street
Headmasters Houso, 102 Johnson Street
Jarkins-Moulton House, 309 Johnson Street
House, 311 Johnson Street
Hendren House, 412 Middle Street
William Hatch Bryan House, 607 Pollock Street
idcKinlay=paves House, 613 Pollock Street
IIouse, 815 Pollock Street
Lewis-I•ihitshurst douse, 403 Queen Street
House, 813 Broad Street
House, 211 Broad Street

Fenn 10•?00aUNITEC 5. ATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STATE
(July 1969) 1 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE North Carolina
NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES COUNTY -- ---
Craven
INVENTORY •NOMINATION FORM FOR NPS USE ONLY
ENTRY NUMBER OAT6
(Continuation Sheet)
(A'unLar all onlrlos)
7. C
While the side -hall plan was certainly the most prevalent Federal form,
center -hall and asymmetrical versions were built as well. A concentration
of those which survive occurs on Pollock Street in the area west of Tryon
Palace, but others are scattered throughout the town. Usually they are two
or two -and -one-half story frame structures (three brick) with gable roofs
(three with gambrel roofs) and Federal interior woodwork.
These structure; which range from quite modest to vary elaborate, in-
clude the following:
Attmore-Oliver House, 513 Broad Street
Harvey Mansion, 519 Tryon Palace Drive
Simpson-Oaksmith-Patterson HOUSE, 226 East Front Street
Tisdale -Jones House, 520 New Street
Jones House, 231 Eden Street
House, 718 Pollock Street
House, 801 Pollock Street
House, 812 Pollock Street
House, 819 Pollock Street
House, 823 Pollock Street '
House, 309 Bern Street
James Bright House, 516 Craven Street
Oliver House, 512 East Front Street
Vail -Clarke House, 519 East Front Street
Silas Latham House, 816 Pollock Street
Mitchell -Bryan House, 221 Johnson Street
House, 206 Metcalf Street
Clarke House, L19 Metcalf Street
McLin-Hancock House, 507 Middle Street
House, 501 New Street
House, 206 Change Street
Hatch -Washington House, 216 Pollock Street
In the Federal era the authorship of several buildings can be attributed
with varying degrees of certainty to Martin Stevenson, Jelin Dewey, Robeirt
Hay, and Uriah Sandy, .four of some forty architect -builder„ established in
the county between 1790 and 1835• As in the Georgian era, this leaves the
majority of structures unlinked to a specific designer.
The Federal style persisted in New Bern well into the 1840s, long after
it had been superseded by the Greek Revival style in other towns. Thia a,as
by no means a result of cultural lag; rather it would seem more likely to be
a product of conservative mercantile interests, a propositicn set .forth by
Talbot Hamlin in Greek Revival Architecture in Amarica:
There were great mercantile and shipping interests, prti_cularly of
Boston and Philadelphia, for whom England and the English colonies
were still the best --and almost the only --customers. Artist;_c consarva.-
a l•a� ,eln:e

Fore; 10.?OOa• UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TJ TE
(July 1969) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
I ,
NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES ICOU;4 TY
INVE14TORY - NOMINATION FORM ui-avelu
FOR NIPS USE ONLY
ENTHY NUMBER UgTE
(Continuation Sheet)
(Numbar ell enlrloa)
7. D
tism often necessarily persisted, owing to the fact that many of the
skilled craftsmen of the country were either English -trained or but
one generation removed from England, and to the fact that, in archi-
tecture at least, all of them depended largely on English books.
The importance of such mercantile interests in New Bern, combined with the
habits of the craftsmen, provide a cogent explanation for the longevity of
the Federal style in the city.
The town clung so tenaciously to Federal architecture, in fact, that it
scarcely acknowledged the existence of other styles. Concessions to the
Greek Revival style usually appear on the interiors of buildings and tare
the form of syrmRetrically molded architraves with corner blocks. In only a
very few cases are classical Greek motifs employed externally. The following
buildings are stylistically transitional; they display the full range of
application of Greek Revival motifs in and on basically Federal forms:
St. Paul's Roman Catholic Church, 510 Middle Street
Jerkins -Duffy House, 301 Johnson Street
House, 820 Broad Street
Justice House, 221 East Front Street
House, 227 East Front Street
House, 620 Craven Street
Sparrow -Daniels House, 222 East Front Street
Dr. Snallwood's House and Office, 501-505 Craven Street
House, 208 Johnson Street
Benjamin Ellis House, 215 Pollock Street
Alexander Miller House and Store, LIN Broad Street
William Hollister House, 613 Broad Street
Primrose House, 318 Craven Street
Jerkins -Bryan House, 520 Craven Street
By the time New Born rejoined the mainstream of architertural trends,
the Greek Revival style was waning, and mid -nineteenth century eclecticism
was flourishing. The town began to experiment with the now styles in the
1840s. The incidence of buildings constructed in the pre -Civil War eclectic
era is lower than that of earlier eras. Probably in part this is due to the
leveling -off of both the population and wealth of New Bern. Although others
existed, only one early Italianate dwelling survives, that being the Thomas
Jerkins House (305 Johnson Street). The Edward R. Stanly House and Dependent
(501 Pollock Street) and the Slover-Bradham House (201. Johnson Street) are
rendered in the Renaissance Revival style. The stately massiveness of the
Slover-Bradham House is unrivaled in the town and in the state; indeed it
would fit quite comfortably amid the town houses on Beacon Hill in Boston.
During this era the congregation of the First Baptist Church elected to build
a now ediface (northwest corner of I4iddle Street and Church Alley), and
obtained a Gothic Revival design from the New York firm, Thomas mid Son.
crua:I.+::

Form 10{:OG, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STATE
(July 1969) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
Nort:
NATIONIL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES C.UNTY
INVENTORY • NOMINATION FORM I graven
FOR NIPS USE ONLY
(Continuation Sheet) ENTRY NUMBER DATE
(1VvmEe, eu
7. E
While participating in -the national architectural mainstream, Now Bern re-
tained a degree of independence of design and materials as evidenced in the
coquina wall and arched gateway. of Cedar Grove Cemetery constructed by the
torn in 1854.
The post -Civil War era saw New Bern fully integrated into the prevailin
national stylistic modes --Second Empire, late Italianate Revival, Romanesque
Revival, Queen Anne, Stick Style) Eastlake and Shingle. Christ Church
(Pollock Street between Craven and Middle streets) was rebuilt between 1871
and 1875 in a late Gothic Revival style and in 1887 had the Stick Style
porch added. A substantial portion of the late nineteenth century domestic
structures, especially the more massive ones, have met with destruction, but
a few of them, plus a number of smaller, more manageable houses survive:
House, 310 New Street
Judge Manly House, 515 East Front Street
House, 516 Johnson Street
Harvey Wadsworth house, 515 Broad Street
Ulysses S. Mace House, 518 Broad Street
Stinson House, 605 East Front Street
Senator Simmons house, 415 East Front Street
House, 616-618 East Front Street
House, 408 Hancock Street
George Slover House, 209 Johnson Street
Former First Baptist Church Parsonage, 304 Johnson Street
Roberts House, 501 Metcalf Street
Foy -Munger House, 516 Middle Street
Hollowell House, 614 Middle Street
House, 207 Pollock Street
House, 224 Pollock Street
Street House, 509 Pollock Street
House, 516 Pollock Street
Mitchell House, 212 Tryon Palace Drive
Wade House, 214 Tryon Palace Drive
In the early twentieth century New Bern experienced a building boom
which in volume came close to rivaling the Federal boom. The economic re-
vitalization of the torn was largely a result of the lumber industry which
produced magnates desirous of living in and capable of paying for the most
impressive houses their money could buy. Obliging these clients was a local
architect, Herbert Woodlry Simpson, who is credited with the design of every
important structure built in New Bern in the first two decades of the
twentieth century. A versatile designer, Simpson excelled in the Queen Anne
and Neo-Classic Revival styles and often combined the two. While practicali
and "progress" have taken their toll of many of his impressive N9o-Classic
Rs7i val structures, a few have survived. They testify to the prosperity and
taste of early twentieth century brew Bernians:
C.P0 cii.1::

NEW BLRN 1NPBNTORr
Ifey:
NR-*Nati oral Register
N-Noviinated National Register
IID-Oom:inmted Historic Di:;brict
Street Nunioer Name
Avenue A
1. 302 House
Bern Street
1. 309 House
2. Btw. Broad & Queen Brick Street
3. At Cedar Ebenezer Presbyterian Church
Broad Street
1.
207
Carraway, House
2.
208
Sudan Temple
3.
21.1/213
James -Davis House
4.
218
Eubank House
5.
405
Green and Redmond Building
6.
1y15-41-7
Alexander Miller House & Store
7•
513
Attiorc-Oliver House
8.
515
Wadsworth House
9•
51.8
Ulysses S. Place House
10.
613
William Hollister House
11..
700
St. Luke's Hospital
12.
701
Rhem-Waldrop House
13.
704
House
14.
706
House
15.
800
Broad St. Christian Church
16.
813
Rice Is Grill
17.
820
House
Change Street
1. 206 House
2. 209 Locch House
3. 231 Gambrel Roof House
Church Street
1., 1020 House
2. 1026 Housa
Craven Street
1. 125 S2aldlin Battery and V'ulcediizin,
2. 132 Dail Building
,,3, 202-208 New Barn Ironworks
4. 217 NE,w Fern Cara re
Status
0
RD
HID
HD
HD
Na
HD
c,U r,
PI<t.
lift
HD
HD
HD
Ho
HD
HD
cow�,„�,A aaz - aQa Crr41e�^ar.

NEW UERN RIrNTORY
S'tre e't Name S to tus
Craven Street Cent'd
5.
219-221
Johnson Machine Co.
HD
6.
1220-226
Old City Hall.
HD
7.
223
Gussman Gleaners
IN
8.
228
Isaac Taylor House
NIP
9•
300-306-308
Craven Country Courthouse
IIl)
10.
307
William Gaston Law Office
11.
318
Primrose IIouse
IN
12.
1I.13-415
Stevenson -Jones House and Office
IID
13.
421
Coor--Gaston House'
NR
14.
501
Dr. Smallwood's House and Office
IID
15.
5o6
Smith -Whitford House
lit.
16.
511
.Hitching Post
17..516
Bright -Bishop House
HD
18.
520
Jerkins -Bryan House
IID
19•
609
House
20.
614
C. S. Hollister House
HD
21.
620
House
IID
22.
Craven at Middle
Brick Street
23.
702
Hancock House
211.
706
House
25.
'710
Judge Donnell. House
Destroynd
Cypress Street
1. Cypress Fc. S,xi.th F:i.rst. Baptist, Church
2. Cypress at Pleet Greenwood Cemetery
East Front Street
1.
214
House
2.
216
House
3.
221
Justine House
N HD
4.
222
Sparrow -Daniels House
HD
5 •
223
IIouse
6.
226
Simpson-Oaksmi.th-Patterson house
NR
7.
227
House
IID
8•
L15
Senator Simons House
HD
9.
501
Coor-Bishop House
NR
10.
511
Moore. House
RD
11.
512
Oliver Gambrel Roof House
IID
12.
514
Gull Harbor
IID N
13.
515
Judge Manly House
HD
14.
516
Maxwell House & Garden
15.
519
Vail. House
HD
16.
520
Sma11mrood--Narrison House & Real. y
17.
521
Slover-Bra.dham House Dependency
IID
18.
%4.
Eli Smallwood House
NR
19.
528
Joss -Jarvis House
NR..
20.
605
Sti,.,:.;on House
h7
21.
606
House
IlD
22.
61:I.
House
231.
612-614
House
24,
616•-618
house
i[il
J.,- 25,
614
douse
.

INEW BERN INV ITCORY
Street Name Sta
Eden Street
1.. 227 Eleanor Marshall House HD
2. 231 Jones House III)
Hirst Street
1. First Street New Bern Water Works
George Street
1. 307 John Wright Stanly House NR
2. 313 Hatch-Daves House HD
3. 419 House
4. 501 House
Hancock Street
1.
210
Benjamin Smith House
NR
2.
213
York -Gordon Ilouse
NR Al
3,
217
House
HD
4.
301
Edward R. Stanly House Dependency
HD
5.
306
Hawks House
NR
n.
W
Ilouse
A
7,
51.4
Masonic Temple and Theatre
NR
Q.
51.7
Bell Building
NF
9.
62.0
Hotel Tryon
Howard Street
1.
705
Race Track Building
Johnson
Street
1.
201
Slove.r.-Bra.dham House
AL2
2.
208
House
RD
3.
209
Slower House
ED
4.
211
Mitchell. -Bryan House
HI)
5.
213
Brinson House
IID
6.
301
Jerkins -Duffy House
A)
7.
304
Former first Baptist Church Parsonage
HD
S.
305
Thomas Jerkins House
INCL
9.
309
Jerkins -Moulton House
III)
10.
311
Leach-Guion House
HD
11.
312
house
1Z
407
House
13.
410
Rouse
14.
411
The Presbyterian .Manse
15.
442
Headmaster's House
HD
K.
516-5.18
House
HD
17.
519
Houco

NGw BERN INVENTORY
Name �- - -- Status -
Jones Street
1- 210 House
2. 2.16 House
3. 309 House
Linden Street
1, 208, 21.0, 2.12 Houses
2. 213 House HD
Metcalf Street
1.
206-208
House
HD
2."
212
House
3.
220
House
4,
218
Gothic Barn
IID
5•
406
House
6,
407
House
7.
410
House
8.
419
Clark House
ED
9.
501
Roberts House
HD
10.
512
House
II9.ddle Street
1.
131-135
Coca Cola Warehouse:
1-:1)
2,
144-146
Piedmont Cigarette Sign
Dastroyed
3.
149
Commorniial Building
Dastroyad
4.
207
Bryan -Block
5.
216 & 2161�2
G. R. Faller Building
6.
220
Commercial Building
HD
7.
224-226
Hotel Albert
IID
8.
Middle at Church
Alley
First Baptist Church
NR
9.
244-246
Jewel Box Jewelers
1.0.
246'1z
Shoemasters
IID
11.
317
First Citizens Bank and Trust
HD
12.
1406
First .Church of Christ, Scientist
HD
13.
4o8
House
HD
114.
Lt10
Mansard Roof' House
15.
1412
The Phone Booth
IID
16,
502
St. Paul's Catholic Rectory
HD
17.
505
Chester B'nai Sholom
HD
18.
510
St. Paul's Catholic Church
Pp..
1.9.
511
House
20.
512
Foy ?louse
HD
21.
5.i6
T'innge.r House
IID
22,
602
Blades Hormo
NR
23.
614 .
Holimml.l House
HD
24,
615
House
25.
61.9
Elijah Clark House
HD
26.
507
IcLin-Hancock House
HD

NE'ri BERM INt/EN1CItY
--- Street _^ Namo —�� -- ----- Sta.tus _._._.-_.
National Avenue
I.
1109
Houso
2.
1203
HOUSE)
3.
1207
House
4.
1215
IIouse
5.
1.404
IIouse
6.
National Ave.
Hebrew Comatery
7,,
National. Ave.
Dicw Bern National Ceineter•y
Nauss Boulevard
1. 1601 Iron Fonce
New Street
1.
208
Hours.
2,
214
Dependency of Coor-Bishop House
IUD
3.
219
Mary Hatch Harrison House
ED
4.
'309
Centenary Methodist Church
hRt.
5•
310
house
HD
6.
412
First Presbyterian Church
NR'
7.
501
House
HD
8.
509
House
9.
510
New Bern Academy
`
10.
519
Roberts IIouse
D-,Stroyed
ll,
520
Tisdale -Jones IIouse
NIJ,
Di-w South Front Street
f VP
1. 1121 House
North Bern Street
i.. 1006 House
2. 101.8 Houso
North Craven Street
.1. 8o6 House
2. 816 House
3. 814 House
4. 818 House
5. N. Craven St. Railroad Shop
6. N. Craven at Avo. C PQaola Milk & Ice Cream Company
Pollock Streo'L
1..
202
IIouse
2.
207
Housa
ID
3.
212
House
`0
4.
215
Benjamin Ellis House
IIh
5.,
216
iiatt h-47ashinHton Housa
I,
6.,
218
Iinusa
7.
220
Jaar r s House
uI)

AiEW BERM INVENTORY
-----
S'tT'P.et
Pollock Street
8.
2L4
House
HD
9.
226
House
Destroyed
10.
Pollock at Cravan
Now Bern Municipal Building
N HD
11.
313
Dank of Now Bern
HD
12.
320
Christ Church & Parish House
11111
13.
Pollock at Middle
Elk Is Temple
HD
14,
IFL4
Tryon Theater
15.
502
Edward R. Stanly House
NR
16.
505
Marks Home
Desbmyo0.
17.
5G9
House
HD
18.
516
House
HO
ig.
603-605
Bryan House and Office
NR.
20.
607
Heuso
HD
21.
6o9
Stevenson House
22.
610
House
2.3.
Pollock at George
Tryon Palace
IIB
24.
61.3
Mclinlay-Daves House
HD
25.
709-711
House
26.
713
House.
IID
27.
715-717
'Doctor I'orhes Louse and office
FID
28.
718-720
House
FITJ
29.
726
Mouse.
HD
30.
801
House
HD
31.
809
All Saints Chapal
HD
32.
812
House
RD
33.
81-5
Hou.:se
HD
34.
816
Silas S. Latham douse
HD
35•'819
House
HD
36.
823
House
RD
37.
323
Baxter Clock
HD N
Queen
Street
1.
216
House
2,
403
Loori.s-Whitehurst House
HD
3.
Queen at Pasteur
Atlantic and East Carolina Railway Stabler,
qU
4.
613, 61.5, 617
St. Oyprian's Ep-JMOpal Church
IFD
5.
831.-833
House
6.
Queen St.
Cedar Grove Cemetery
Y
7.
Queen St.
National Guard Armory
8.
830
House
9•
Queen St,
Jennet.te Grave Yard
Rham Avenue
1. Rhem Ave.
Spencer Avenue
1. 1322-1321y
2. 1522-1524
3. :1701.
Eleanor Marshall School
House
!louse
House

NEW BERN INVENTORY
Street Nam3 St. t,us -
Tryon Road
1. 1510 House
Tryon Pal -ace Drive
1. 21-2 Houso FD
2, 214 Wade House HD
3. 219 Harvey Mansion DR
4- La7.--419 Armstrong Grocery Warehouse HD
West Street
1. 612--614 West Street House
Wi.zidley Stres b
1. Windley &. Guion New Bern Oil & Fertilizor

Form 10-300. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STATE
N ply WO) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE North Carolina
NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES COUNTY - '-
INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM Craven
_FOR NPS USE ONLY
(Continuation Sheet) ENTRY NUMUER 045'1i
(iYwnber uN onfrfeoJ —_— ----
7. F
C. S. Hollister House, 614 Craven Street
Coor-Bishop (remodeling), 501 East Front Street
L. I. Moore House, 511 East Front Street
St. Paul's Catholic Church Rectory, 502 Middle Street
First Church of 'Christ Scientist, 406-408 Middle Street
Chester B1nai Sholom Synagogue, 505 Middle Street
Foy House, 512 I+Iiddle Street 17,
W. B. Blades House, 602 Middle Street
Jarvis House, 220 Pollock Street
Centenary Methodist Church; 209 New Street
St. Cyprian's Episcopal Church, 613 Queen Street
The stylistic variety of the late nineteenth and early twentieth century
is perhaps best observed in commercial, civic, and ecclesiastical structures.
Surprisingly many of these public buildings remain:
Green and Redmond, 405 Broad Street
Broad Street Christian Church, 802 Broad Street
Commercial Building, 219021 Craven Street
01d City Hall, 220-226 Craven Street
(' Craven County Courthouse, 300-308 Craven Street,._-)
Store and House, 606 East Front Street
Warehouses, Tryon Palace Drive; between Middle and Hancock streats
Gothic Revival Barn, 218 Metcalf Street
Commercial Building, 220 Middle Street
Hotel Albert, 224-226 Middle Street
Shoemasters, 2462 Middle Street
First Citizens Bank and Trust Company, 317
Baxter Clock, 323 Pollock Street
Now Bern Municipal Building, Pollock Street
Bank of New Bern, 313 Pollock Street
Elks Temple,jJ0 Pollock Street
All Saints' Chapel, 809 Pollock Street
Atlantic and East Carolina Railway Station,
Armstrong Grocery Warehouse, 4172-419 Tryon
Middle Street
at Craven Stvaet
Queen Street at Pastsur
Palace Drive
In the mid -twentieth century the appearance of New Bern was consider
altered by the closing of George Street from Pollock Street south to We
Trent River and the reconstruction of the Governor's Palace, now known as
Tryon Palace.
t

T
SIGNIFICANCE —
PERIOD (Check One ar Afore as Appropriate)
❑ Pre -Columbian ❑ 161h Century [)a lath Century tie 2UIh Century
❑ 1511, Century ❑ 17th Century 1916 Century
SPECIFIC DATEISI (It Applicable and Known)
AREAS OF SIGNIFICANCE (Check One or Afore as Appropriate)
Aboriginal ❑ Education [ ] political 0 urban Planning
Prehistoric ,
❑ ❑ Engineering ❑ Reli9inn/Phi- ❑ Other (Specify)
❑ Historic ❑ Industry losophy
❑ Agriculture ❑ Invention ❑ Science
Architecture ❑ Landscape ❑ Sculpture
❑ Art Architecture ❑ Social/Homeo-
® Commerce ❑ Literature Harion _
❑ Communications ❑ military ❑ Theater
❑ Conservation ❑ Music F1 Transportation
STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE
New Bern is often thought of primarily as a colonial tovm, and indeed
it had become by the Revolution a wealthy port town and important political
center with a concentration of handsome Georgian buildings, of th ich a
number remain. Yet it was in the post -Revolutionary period that New Bern
underwent a dramatic architectural efflorescence that produced a body of
urban Federal buildings of academic sophistication and superb craftsmanship
seldom rivaled in the country. The typical dwelling of this period was a
side -hall plan town house enriched with delicate, inventive yet restrained
ornament inside and out --epitomized in the Eli Smallwood House. The same
elegance characterizes such institutional buildings as the New Bern kc-6am3r
the Masonic Temple and Theater, and the First Presbyterian Church. Not onl;
are New Bern's Federal buildings of the highest quality; a remarkable
number --over fifty --survive, most in good condition, and rally still e.:ist
in their original_ context and are used for their original purpose. `ha
tenacious hold of .the style only gradually gave tray to the eclecticimr, of
the later nineteenth century, but this period, as well as the early
twentieth century, produced a remarkable collection of handscaie domestic
and institutional buildings that are an important part of the architectural
fabric of the town. Now Bern, with much of its atmosphere, scale, and
ambiance still remarkably intact, exhibits a range, sophistication, and
excellence of architectural styles unique in North Carolina, highlighted
by a collection of Federal structures of major national significance.
New Bern, settled by German Palatine and Swiss colonists under Baron
Christoph von Graffenreid in 1710, is at the confluence of the Trent and
Meuse rivers. Problems with the '_Tuscarora Indians in the area and the
death of the group's leaders retarded the growth of the town, but the early
settlers make important contributions: the selection of a site and the
establishment of a settlement, the design of the town plan and the conferri
of a name --New Barn --after the settler's home canton in Switzerland. Da.spiVe
the 1711 massacre by the Tuscaroras, the town survived and grew stead:LI , sq
that by the mid -eighteenth century it had achieved considerable imporu_nuo.;
In 1712, the area called Craven, was a precinct of Barth Coim ty, end by
1722 New Bern became the seat of Craven precinct. within r..ln':- n years e
that date Eduard Moseley's survey showed four streets--Frcnt or Hater,
Craven, P'Liddle, and an east -west street that today is eitber Pollock or
Broad. An Anglican parish covering the r:roa.:r-_s created in 1.71.5, and b3,
1734 there was a .full-time mi)u tir in Fo,, _3 Vn. The colonial asse(li^l_y �

F.,n, 10-300. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STATE
(July 1969) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE North Carolina
NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES COUNTY �^
INVENTORY • NOMINATION FORM Craven
FOR NPS USE ONLY
(Continuation Sheet) ENTRY NUMBER DATE
(.Yumbor o(( m(rloa)
8. A
first not in New Bern in 1737, and after 1746, met there regularly until afte
the American Revolution, with the exception of the few years during which
Governor Arthur Dobbs moved the seat of government to the Cape Fear. In 1749
the first printing press in North Carolina was established in New Bern. The
printer, .James Davis, began in 1751 the first newspaper in the colony, the
North -Carolina Gazette.
New Bern, the most central of the North Carolina coastal settlements,
was a natural center for government and trade; it was relatively accessible
to the outside world by water and to interior settlements by river and over-
land transportation. Governor Milliam Tryon firmly established New Bern as
the colonial capital in 1765 when he began construction of the Governor's
Palace. Tryon chose a site on the southwestern perimeter of the settlement
and John Hawks from England as the architect.
The boundaries selected for the New Barn Historic District correspond
closely with the area indicated as being settled on C. J. Sauthier's 1769 may
of the town. The section of Pollock Street west of the palace was "taken up'
during the next two decades. Close to the confluence of the two rivers,
clustered around the Anglican Church. at Middle and Pollock streets, the
cotmnercial center of the town was developing. Printing press, stores, banks,
and the municipal wharves were between the palace and the point where the
rivers join. Commercial and residential structures traditionally coexisted
on the river shores. The fine dwellings of merchants Are often coupled with
the means of their income --wharves, warehouses, and offices --a situation
which lasted until the twentieth century.
In the decade following the construction of the Governor's Palace, Now
Bern became a revolutionary center as well. The first publicly initiated
assembly was called there on August 25, 17714, against the wishes of the
governor; in accordance with the resolves of that Congress and those of a
second popular assembly which met in New Bern on April 3, 1775, committees of
safety for that town and Craven County and for other North Carolina jurisdic-
tions were created. Iwo weeks later, with the arrival of nea of the Battle
of Lexington, the local militia began drilling. The Americas! Revolution was
underway in North Carolina, and the royal governor, in effect, became a
prisoner in his own palace. The port of New Bern sheltered numerous privates s
who operated continuously throughout the war. Early in 1777 the first state
government under a new constitution was inaugurated in New Bern under Co,erno
Richard Caswell. The assembly continued to meet there until April, 1780,
when Governor Nash took his oath of office in the Governor's Palace.
The palace was already in bad repair by that time anfl !filliam Hooper
noted that it had "more the appearance of a neglected jail than anything
else." The palace served various u..sos until 1798 (:in that year for instance
it housed the New Born Acadomy), whom all but tie wings burned. After the
bzrning of the palace, the land was opened for settlamDnt and quickly filled
critl! houses; George Street was extended southward toward tho Trent Rivcr,
GPI, `J:'.Y>A

F onn 10-700. UNjTFD STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR :TATE
(July 1969) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE North Carolina
NATIONAL REGISTER OF FIISTORIC PLACES COUNTY
Craven
INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM
FOR PIPS USE ONLY
(Con(inuotion Sheet) II"TRY NUP,UiCR UATE
----
(Number .11
8.B
With the .assau.bly's decision of December, 1721, to move the state capital
inland, New Bern was left to fend for itself. The rivers and the trade they
carried always had been a part of her livelihood, but they were to become her
major means of support. Well endowed with dense pine forests in the surround-
ing area, the tcnrn came to export vast quantities of lumber, hogshead staves,
barrel heading, tar, pitch, and spirits of turpentine. In addition, New Bern
was the funnel through which passed farm products like pork, corn, and peas.
New Bern and her residents had been and continued more and more to participate
in the triangular trade route between the Carolinas, the blest Indies (and the
Iberian Coast), and New England.
Although residents think of New Bern as a colonial town, the physical
evidence remaining reflects a city that achieved its apex of prosperity and
sophistication in the Federal era. The blocks filled out; in the area of the
Neuse River civic and cultural amenities like the New Bern Academy and.the
Masonic Temple and Theatre were constructed; Baptist, Methodist, Presbyterian,
and Catholic congregations built churches.(That built by the Catholics --
St. Paul's --was the first in the state.) The shore of the Trent River dQvDlor
as a tightly -packed commercial section; wharves and docks expanded; livery
stables, restaurants, boarding houses,and stores accommodated both the resider
and transient. The jagged shoreline still bears evidence of the slips and
wharves which were fostered by water commerce and many early wharf area
buildings remain as well. •
Just as shipping played a large part in evolving the character of the
area in the mid -eighteenth century, so did the railroad in the mid-rn'_netsenth
The tracks of the Atlantic and North Carolina Railroad (now the Southern
Railway) run through the district, down Hancock Street (referred to for many
years as Railroad Avenue), and the station which brought freight and travello
from the east and .rest was established here. The railroad ryas neither an
interloper nor polluter as it might seem to many to be today, but an irdieati
of the town's progress and prosperity. Just as tho wharfs, warehouses, and
stores of the shippers had been an integral and welcome part of a residential -
area a century before, so was the railroad in the 1850s.
When Union forces occupied New Bern early in the Civil War (in April of•
1862), they established headquarters in two Neuse River mansions, the Slover-
Bradham House and the Jones -Jarvis House. Other officers and enlisted men
were billeted throughout the city. Union occupation affected the area little
in an architectural sense except for the fact 'that they saved the city by
extinguishing the fires set by the fleeing Confederates. When the restored
government of North Carolina was authorized by President Lincoln, Edward
Stauly, formerly of New Bern, was appointed governor, and he too established
both his offices and residence along the Neuse. Actually, New Bern survived
the war with little damage, except of course to family fortunes.
The city entered its third era of intensive development in the deeadpc
innediately preceding and after 1900; once again its base was lumber.

Fanm 10.300a - UNITED 57ATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STATE
(July 1969) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE North Carolina
NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES ""TY"
INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM Craven
FOR NPS USE ONL
Wo..)
B. C
(Continuation Sheet) ENTRY NUMBER DATE
— -.
Timberlands in the surrounding counties produced fine quality pine, gum, cypre
oak, and other hardwoods which kept New Bern's lumber mills (sixteen in 1916)
abundantly supplied. In addition, the city was a superior source for seafood,
especially shell fish, and what was not consumed locally or shipped out was
processed in several fertilizer factories. Limited amounts of cotton and
tobacco filtered through New Bern but were vastly outweighed by truck crops
distributed through several wholesale grocers. Two railroads and six steamshi
companies carried freight and visitors to and from Now Berry and shipping by
this time was centered almost exclusively on the Trent River. Building during
this vital era produced a number of elaborate and ambitious domestic, insti=
tutional, and commercial structures. The First Church of Christ, Scientist,
was the first edifice constructed by that faith in North Carolina.
The advent of World War II brought in swarms of armed service personnal
attached to nearby Cherry Point Air Base. To accommodate the considerable
overflow £ram Cherry Point, New Bernians opened their homes and divided other
stately houses into apartments. Some of the alterations were sympathetically
done, but in other cases buildings were mutilates d.
In the 1940s Minnete (Mrs. Richard) Duffy inspired and initiated the
movemant to reconstruct the governor's palace. Mrs. Maude Moore LathatR
established two trust funds for the reconstruction. The actual construction,
which began in the mid-1950s, necessitated the closing of George Street.
Known as the Tryon Palace complex, the area includes the reconstructed palace;
the Stevenson House, a restorad Federal era house museum; the Daves House,
used for administrative offices; the Jones House, a guest house; an auditorium
and the John Wright Stanly House, a Georgian style house muse o . The develop-
ment of the historical complex has been instrumental in brinEki; visitors into
New Bern.
GPO ,pl.p

9.'.r !•iAJOR 618LIOGRA PH ICAL REFERENCES
Research by Tony P. T,;;rann consultant and Janet K. Seapker, survey specialist
architectural description by Janet K. Soapker.
Carraway Gertrude. Crc:Fn of Life, History of Christ Church New Bern, North
Carolina, 1715-?910. New Bern: Owen G. Dunn, 1940.
Tears oi• Light, His Cary of St. John's Lode No. 3 All'&AM New'Bern, North
Carolina. New Bern: Owen G. Dunn, 19 4•
Craven County Records, Craven County Courthouse, New Bern, North Carolina,
Office of Register of Deeds (Subgroups: Deeds, Wills).
Craven county Records, Office of Archives and History, Raleigh, North
Carolina (Subgroups: Deeds Wills).
16
:'xGEOGR PHICAt; DATA L t
LATITUDC AND LONGITUDE COORDINATES
LATITUDE AND L0nIGI;­1DE r,n URPINAZE$
DEFINING A RECTANGLE LOCATING THE PRO-VSTY
0
DEFINING THc QL"TZR POINT C.,- A PROPERTY
OF_L_E_SS TH AN_T--I :,RES _
R
LATITUDE
LONGITUDE
LATITUDE
0SCITUDF_
Degrees Minutes Seconds
Degrees A{inules Seconds
D...... 6linutes Seconds
D.,,, Minw.z Se ... ds
35 a o6 • 56.
77- 02• 57°
D
., .
rAPPROXIMATE
35 a 06 ' 56 -
77e 02• 01�
35 n 0�' 10 •
77° 02' 014
3 n0l0•
7a02•
ACREAGE OF NOMINATED PROPERTY: 25O acrBS
ILIST ALL STATES AND COUNTIES FOR PROPERTIES OVERLAPPING STATE OR COVNTY BOUNDARIES —
STATE:
COOS
COUNTY
CODE
STATE:
COLIC
COUNTI'I
CODE
STATE:
CODE
COUNTY:
CODE
STATE:
COUNTY:
= ODI
CODE
L., FORNP:REPAR�.,G}.`:$Y� .•.".. y'..°
' r:..::: �: I.at ."� ..r.s ,-:.�� __�
_—,:''�s
NAME AND TITLE:
Survey and Planning Unit —
ORGANIZATION
DATL
Office of Archives and History __
23 May 1973
STREET AND NUMBER: -
109 East Jones Street
CITY OR TOLN.
STATE _
CODE
37
Raleigh
North Carolina �
'T7
'.oIATE; LI TSQ:i'.QFrI ER;G GirlC`�:I 1„OeV ;'...,.:-
.::.NA,IONN12 PEG!, -,ER ..:..
As the designated State Liaison Officer [or the Na-
1 hereby certify that this prmx:rly included in the
tional Historic Preservation Act of 1566 (Public Law
-
89-665), I hereby nominal.. this property for ine.IGSian
National Register.
in the National Register and certify that it. has been
evaluated according to the c-iteria and procedu res set
forth by the National Park Servim The recommended
Olrunlm, Otflcr ufArchunlnpY rend }:ianrlc Prrmonvllan
level of Significance of this nomination is:
National IN State Lacal p
-
Lsto
Ns•ne
H. G. nesiF�
nTrlsr:
Title State Hist rian/Adclinistrator
I
_
Kaynm of She IFnlinn:d Ra,?lster
nntr_. 23 May 1273
I
Da Le __—• -
-----
t/r
rn
m

Form' 10•_00, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR r
ATI:(JOY 15h7) FA TIDNAL PARK SERVICE orthNATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES UNT.
INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM
FOR NPS USE ONLY
(Continuation Sheet) ENTRY NUMUER DATE
(Nuribnr ull onlri n.v)
Dill, Alonzo T. "Eighteenth Century New Bern: A History of the Town and
Craven County, 1700-1800," The North Carolina Historical Review, XXII and
YaIII (January, April, July, October, 19 ;'January, April, July, October
1946).
GOvarnor Tryon and His Palace, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina
Press, 1955•
Mann, A. W. History of the Forty Fifth Regiment Massachusetts Volunteer
Militia. Jamaica Plains: Brookside Print, 1908.
Taller, Stephen F. "Recollections of New Bern 50 Years Age," Our Living and
Our Dead. New Bern, 1873.
Moora, Elizabeth. Documents and unpublished manuscripts.
Nowitzky, George I. The Marine Metropolis of Virginia and the Sound and Riv
Cities of North Carolina. Norfolk and Raleigh: George I. Nowitzky, 1
Platt, Virginia Bever. "Tar, Staves, and New England Rum: The Trade of
Aaron Lopez of Newport, Rhode Island, with Colonial North Carolina,"
The North Carolina Historical Review, XLVIII (January, 1971).
Price, Jonathan. Plan of the Town of New Bern. 1810.
Sanborn Insurance Maps, 1885, 1888, 1 9� 1898, 1904, 1908.
Sauthier, C. J. Plan of Newbern, 1769.
Vass, Reverend L. C. History of the Presbyterian Church in New Bern, North
Richmond: Whittet and Shepperson, 1686.
Ldhitford, Colonel John D. "The Home of the Walking Stick, Early History
the Biblical Recorder and Baptist Church in New Bern." Unpublished
manuscripts in possession of tors. G. Tull Richardson, Bellair, New
North Carolina.
of
Bern,
GPO 921.724

Form No. 10.300a
IRay. 10.74)
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FOR NPS'USE-OKY'' '�
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE " .
AiCEIVFo'
NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM CATE ENTERED'
Amendment to the New Bern Historic
District, Craven County, N.C.
CONTI NUATION SHEET - ITEM NUMBER 7 PAGE 7
In March of 1982 Archaeological Research Consultants of Chapel Hill, N.C.', and
Tidewater Atlantic Research of Washington, N.C., under contract to the
Wilmington District, undertook an underwater investigation of the Efird Company
property in New Bern, N.C. This survey took place in the waters of the Neuse
River in an area immediately adjacent to the.New Bern Historic District, The
area surveyed is owned by the Efird Company, New Bern, N.C., and the State of
North Carolina.. A summary of the findings of the survey is presented below. A
more complete description can be found in the report entitled "A Cultural
Resources Survey of the Efird Company Property, New Bern, N.C."
Examination of the proposed boat basin identified the remains of a timber frame
and ballast cobble structure that covered roughly 50 percent of the area. From
a point 40 feet east of a galvanized iron pipe at mean low water on the north
property line a series of timbers, approximately 12 inches square, had been
employed to construct a retaining bulkhead. The feature had been positioned to
extend east 55 feet before joining a second segment of retaining bulkhead
extending 45 feet to the south. At that point a third segment of retaining
bulkhead was found to extend east for an additional 60 feet. Vertical butt
scarfs were'employed in fashioning joints, and iron pins were used to both
secure scarf joints and assure vertical integrity.
Along the third segment additional timbers approximately 12 feet long and cut
:y4a 6 inches by 8 inches, were found to have been positioned perpendicular to the
east/west segment on centers of approximately 5 feet. Each was found to project
north of the 60—foot section approximately 1S inches and extend south into
ballast cobble and brick rubble concentrated south and west of each segment of
the feature. Ballast cobble and brick rubble were observed to extend
approximately 20 feet to the south and west of each segment. However, only
random scatter was found to the north and east. Otherwise, the bottom surface
was found to be free of cultural material.

Form No. 10-300a
Woo. 10.741
UNITED STA'fESDEPARTMENT OF•TkEINURIOR ORNP.5U360NIY.
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
INVENTORY- NOMINATION FORM ATE ENTEIIFD,
Amendment to the New Bern Historic
District, Craven County, N.C.
CONTINUATION SHEET ITEM NUMBER 7 PAGE 8
Along that section of the project area south of the proposed boat basin and
lying west of and adjacent to the Neuse River channel, a series of timber cribs
approximately 10 feet square and 3 to 4 feet deep was found to have been
positioned adjacent to the shore. The cribs, coostructed from timbers cut
roughly 12 inches square, were located immediately inside or west of the line of
abandoned pilings. Each crib was filled with a combination of ballast cobble
and brick rubble to'within 18 inches of the water surface. Outside the cribs
and pilings, the bottom surface was found to be free of cultural material with
the exception of an occasional ballast cobble or brick fragment. Light-colored
sediment in the area between the pilings and the channel shoulder was found to
extend to a depth of more than 4 feet.
Immediately north of the northernmost crib the remains of a wooden hull steam
vessel were found. Approximately 30 feet of the stern lay exposed beyond the
extent of modern rubble fill composing the present shoreline. Within the
remains of an eliptically-shaped fantail, the rudder, rudder shaft and quadrant,
and a four -blade, 4-foot diameter iron propeller were found immediately aft and
east of the sternpost,. From the sternpost an iron propeller shaft extended west
into the remains of the hull. Frames approximately 6 inches square and hull
planking approximately 2 inches in thickness identified the extremities of the
hull and provided an indication that the beam.was approximately 20 feet.
-A

Fo(m No. 10300a
lRow. 10.74)
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT UN THE INTI:RIOR
FOR NPS USE ONLY
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
RECEIVED
NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
INVENTORY --NOMINATION FORM DATE ENTERED
Amendment to the New Bern Historic
District, Craven County, N. C.
- CONTINUATION SHEET _ ITEM NUMBER 8 PAGE 4
The bulkheads, cribs, and 19th century vessel contained in the area being added
to the New Bern Historic District meet criteria c (embody the distinctive
characteristics of'a type period or method of construction) and criteria d (have
yielded or likely to yield information important in history). In addition the
area containing these structures represent one of the last remaining areas of
the New Bern Historic Waterfront.
Structural evidence found in the area of the proposed boat basin and dock
complex appears to be the remains of a wharf complex and associated slips. A
brief survey of maps of New Bern dating from 1769 through 1924 indicates that
the structure was not on the site prior to 1810 and was no longer in use by
1880. A plan of the town dated 1849 illustrates a waterfront configuration
similar to that indicated by the remains of the wharf structure. A Civil War
period plan indicates the presence of a wharf in the area but it does not
conform to the configuration present on the plan of 1849. ,
The cribbing located to the south and adjacent to the Neuse River channel
appears to have been constructed at the site at some time between the Civil War
and 1880. Examination of available maps of the area indicates that the features
may have been associated with the New Bern Manufacturing Company that was
located on the site by 1880 and the grist and fertilizer company of E.H. and
S.A. Meadows, which appears as early as 1888. .The configuration of the
waterfront from 1880 until 1924 indicates that the cribbing could have served
both firms as a wharf and dock structure.
The remains of the steam vessel. identified during the survey can reliably be
considered to date from the 19th century. While it is possible that the ship is
associated with structures that appear on the 1849 map, it is also possible that
the vessel could have been as with either New Bern Manufacturing or E.H.
and J.A. Meadows Company later in the century. The position of the wreck
indicates that the vessel was either -moored at its present location when it sank
or was deliberately sunk at the site. In the case of the former, it is likely
that both the vessel and the dock were no longer in active use or the steamer
would have been raised to clear the slip or return it to service. If the vessel
was deliberately sunk at the location, it would seem that either the slip was no
longer in demand or the hull was to be employed to contain fill as part of an
expanding wharf complex. The lack, of fill in the stern makes this unlikely.

Form Na. 10.300A
(Rev. 10.741
UNITED STATES DEPARTNIENTOFTHE INTERIOR PORNPS'USEONhY'`.'
NA'(IONAtPAAXSERVICE - f
RECEIVED.
NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
INVENTORY- NOMINATION FORM OATE ENTERED
Amendment to the New Bern Historic
District, Craven County, N.C.
CONTI NUAT;ON SHEET ITEM NUMBER 8 PAGE 5
The wreck contains information about the design and construction of what is
%f likely a local vessel, only a superficial examination of marine architecture
and ship construction source material is necessary to illustrate how little is
known of vessels constructed in North Carolina and the southeastern United
States. This absence of primary historical source data makes the remains of
local, vessels particularly significant. The fact that the wreck represents a
steam vessel dating possibly as early as the second quarter of the 19th century
increases its value, as this was an important period in the development of steam
technology. The propeller, for example, was invented in 1834. An early date
for construction could mean that the vessel's powerplant and propulsion
machinery represent an early example of steam engineering. While the location
of the vessel must be considered an indication of its possible association with
fourth quarter businesses previously identified, it is also possible that the
ship could be associated with New Bern's Civil War history or have served as one
of several ferries known to have operated out of the general area.prior to and
after the Civil War.

SURVEf
1.1 NEW UERN IN CUAMTVW�'
IS 2 j sy Af
T 2 Eap 000 FEED A".
pile
t4ckp, IN
N.
ul'geton
;Ap
ro"0
T 0 W 11 S 11
U6
,�%.
Mr a, M Q
YP
n
1 FEET
YZ_
JI V.
l.c. 6em
wo point
C�
06c"I Point
a
Slump
7-
%
F.W A 10
P:5ng
'85
AN 1 1 D,10hin
Ali -
F
5.

,I]
�\..ugMAr
:ravel
"erne
_--- I UTM COORDINATES
Nc J Point A N.3886275 E.314500
Point B N.3886500 E,314600
OVAaRANGLL AOCGNne Point C.N.3886400 E.314490
Point D N.3886600 E.314500
1
000 FEET �sN+,, nNu rs °rr
F �r�
\ `p.%1 ✓• +� l' 11 �•\
Piles \� "r4"�• \`
( Q•+•' 'si
DalPninn 1•:ii LS 4.'.
NEW BERN QUADRANGI.
NORTH CAROLINA
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (I.OPOORAP,
SE/+NEW BERN IS' QUADRANGLE
;v5: T0WNSHII
p-. EXISTING BOUNDARY OF THE �-^'�i,_ i
NEW BERN HISTORIC DISTRICTC
�` I �•T _Q.i It
,\; P:bnQ o..I In � ':�lY •
It r18—, IL
C A
New ern ••'• \� ,> -, �+
EIRn JIU ' n Point
Sandy Po' lnl
PROPOSED AREA TO BE ADDED TO SIamP
THE NEW BERN HISTORIC DISTRICT
\ I Faul'-
,• PibnR
oolphm
La -
Foul G Ucn[
Mt
eN la � � ••l`r`1 ` . Ao.� \\
wGreen Spring \
• i�> `-�'��1��\'� T:• Point \
SCALE I24000 NEW BERN, N
Cu.__A.�._—_____--=�.vq[ i SEJ+ NEW BERR IS' GUADII,
t,w o :mv :ow nw Jona eaw acw Jow E[u N3500—W7700/7
I +4Jv[IER 1
1950
PHUTONEVIStU .
AMS 5551 If SE-SERII.

March 1 T, 2020
MEA10PANDUMs
SUBJECT:
Appilcant:
Project; Location;:
ProposedPropci; to
REPLY:
B -* RAXTONDAVIS
Roy B6wnl6w,,IX%frlc( Manager.
N GDE0 . OW I I i !on: bb ast of Man . dgerrient
400 Commerce M0006d,City, NOW667
RM RiN
r , ov; . br 6 , Wnl0W0.h6ddh . OA60.
W.. . .... ...... .... Wo
CRAVEN COUNTY
rap,004VO f 910401? 9 1 1.­ b' fitfo, sp6citippro
09loa etterase.and r
L - i mgagency has noopjeQvqn.to!nq project as proposed.
'
"Add.tlonajrnffi .COehlsMay bezatt ach edW
This ag nly,h P . commentpn the
$6. prolect;
This qgqn0y eppr9yo.othe p proje
ct t nlyl he recommended ch6nges
aro. 160ofporated.See attadhed,
This agency objects to the projectlor reasons clescribefln the attached : comments.
P j144 efj'.0 fl- .5 5L7C&lj

ROY
Np{!) a ATmt INA
March 11, 2020
MEMORANDiIM:
FROM: Roy Brownlow District Manager
NCDEO - Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave.; Morehead City, NC 28557
Fax: [phone] (Courier 04.10 43)
rov. biownlow(fi?nodencgov
SUBJECT: CA MA Ma/or Express Permit Application Review
Applicant: CRAVEN COUNTY
Project Location: 203 South Front Street New Bern NC 28560-4971
MICHAEL S. REGA
BRAXTON DA
hinvor.. Dimm ort
Proposed Project: To reconfigure the existing patio to abetter use and fit for specific programs
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
retum this form to Roe Brownlow at the address above by March 24, 2020(14days). If you have i
questions regarding the proposed project, contact Roy Brownlow [phone] when appropriate, in-c
comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
"Additional comments may be attached"
jC -his agency has no comment on the proposed project
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described In the attached
PRINT NAME_ L. G. e-
AGENCY /VC �yh.,erce
SIGNATURE _ -'� Z�C-z
DATE 3-/3-20
Smfe of North Ca Iim I Environmenlel Qualify I CoanW Mmag=nt
400 Commerce Ave. Morehead CiW. NC 28557 [phone]

NfnTtrttnRQiiFk;
%Aebo,eerrtdr(3;aup
March 11, 2020
MEMORANDt1tA:
i
FROM:.
SUBJECT:
Applicant:
Project Location.,
Roy Brovi mlow District Manager
NCDEQ - Di5lsloh of Coastal Management
400 PommerceAve , Moreheatl Clty, NC 28557-
Fax: [phone] rCptrrlerQ4 f 331
rav:brownlow�hcden r.aov-
61i41A hXAJbTExpFess Pej(iitApAl�caflon {tevlew
CRAVEN COUNTY
203,South Front Street New Bern NC 28560=4971
ROY COOPER
Gammor
MICHAEL S. REOAN
tieti4vig7•
BRAXTON'DA.VIS
Ul rda'., Ilrlela�o/Ciiaddl"
d1N)y;cWeN
Proposed Project To reconfiguretheexisting patio to abetter use and fit forspecl/!c programs
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint,on the proposed project and
return this form to Rov Brownfow attire address above by I0arch'24, 2020(14days).. If you have any
questions regarding the proposed project, contact Roy Brownlow:(252) 8084808 when appropriate,.in•depth
comments with supporting details requested.
REPLY:. V This agency has no objection"to the project as proposed.
"Additional comments may beattached'•
This.agencyhas no.cornment on the proposed project.
This agency approves oftheproject only ifthe ��ecomrriended changes
are incorporated, See, attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments,
PRItJT,;NAME ��t��12 , �trdY]j�y>Z,
_ SW FE2M1'r M4]I�1C$TIV
AGENCY.�ML)?
tzvc4=— 2
SIGNATURE �—� t
DQ'fE /II ZG
'State afho th dMiu a 11k,-imnmaaal Quality l Coavnlfilanagtmtm
400Cmnmelte Alt Mmtheal Chy, NC 28557 (252) M2808
eF.FS.-x...`1 Y 0.''{x..:w5- � v— - S.sM . '.n'.

ROY, COOPER NORTH CAROLINA
Governor Environmental Quality
MICHAEL.S, REGAN
Secretary
BRAXTON C. DAVIS
Director
City of New Bern
406 Craven Street
New Bern NC 285560-4971
Dear Mr. Dail
The NC Division of Coastal Management hereby acknowledges receipt of your application
for State approval for development of your property 203 S. Front Street New Bern, North
Carolina. It was received on 10 March 2020, and appears to be adequate for processing at
this time. The projected deadline for making a decision is 09 April 2020. Roy Brownlow,
District Manager for the Division of Coastal Management is responsible for processing your
permit and he can be reached at 252-808-2808 or via email at roy.brownlowftncdenr gov if
you have any questions.
If this agency does not render an express permit decision within 30 days from 10 March
2020, you may request a meeting with the Director of the Division of Coastal Management
and permit staff to discuss the status of your project. Such a meeting will be held within five
working days from the receipt of your written request and shall include the property owner,
developer, and project designer/consultant.
NCGS 113A-119 (b) requires that Notice of an application be posted at the location of the
proposed development. Enclosed you will find a "Notice of Permit Filing" postcard which
must be posted at the property of your proposed development. You should post this notice
at a conspicuous point along your property where it can be observed from a public road.
Some examples would be: Nailing the notice card to a telephone pole or tree along the road
right-of-way fronting your property, or at a point along the road right-of-way where a private
road would lead one into your property. Failure to post this notice could result in an
incomplete application.
ixwr"r ID79 Q5
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Coastal Management
'Washington Office 1943 Washington Square Mall I Washington, North Carolina 27889 1252.946.6481
Wilmington Office 1127 Cardinal Drive Extension I Wilmington, North Carolina28405 1910.796.7215
Morehead City Office 1 400 Commerce. Avenue I- Morehead Cltv..Worth Carolina 28557 1 2528082808

An onsite inspection will be made, and if additional information is required, you will be
contacted by the appropriate State or Federal agency. Please contact me if you have any
questions and notify me in writing if you wish to receive a copy of my field report and/or
comments from reviewing agencies.
Sincerely, a O
Roy Brownlow
Coastal Management District Manager
Division of Coastal Management
Morehead City Office
Enclosure
Cc: Lynn Hardison - Express Permit Coordinator
Jonathan Howell- Major Permits Coordinator
North Carolina. Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Coastal Management
Washington Office 1943 Washington Square.Mall I Washington, North Carolina 27889 1252946.(,481
Wilmington Office 1127 Cardinal Drive Extension I Wilmington, North Carolina 284051910.796.7215
Morehead On, Office 1 400 Commerce Avenue I Morehead City. North Carolina 285571 252808.2808

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
BRAXTON C. DAVIS
Director
Sun Journal
P.O. Box 1149
New Bern NC 27932
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
11 March 2020
Attention: Legal Advertising Department
Please include the enclosed Notice of Filing in the Public Notice section of the 12 March
2020 edition of your newspaper. If it will not be possible to include this notice in that edition, or
if you should have any questions about this notice, please call me as soon as possible at 948-3820.
The State Office of Budget and Management requires an original Affidavit of
Publication prior to payment for newspaper advertising. Please send the affidavit, an
original copy of the published notice, and an original invoice to:
ATTACHMENT
Cc: File
Ellie Davis
NCDEQ
COASTAL MANAGEMENT DIVISION
400 COMMERCE AVENUE
MOREHEAD NC 28557
252-808-2808 ext. 229
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Keri Sparks, Administrative Assistant II
Division of Environmental Quality
Division of Coastal Management
rxmnrwxx�FQ
mwmmmew®wmm,�
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Coastal Management
Washington Office 1943 Washington Square Mali I Washington, North Carolina 278891252,946.6481
Wilmington Office 1127 Cardinal Drive Extension I Wilmington, North Carolina 284051'910.796.72L5
Morehead City Office 1 400 Commerce: ivenue I Morehead City. North Carolina 28557 1 252808.2808

NOTICE OF FILING
OF APPLICATION FOR
CAMA MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
The Department of Environment and Natural Resources hereby gives public notice as
required by N.C.G.S. 113A-119(b) that an application for a development permit in an Area of
Environmental Concern as designated under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) was
received on 10 March 2020. According to the said application submitted by City of New Bern
propose to re -develop the existing outdoor patio space at the New Bern convention Center to a
multi -level patio are for public municipal and recreational use and construct to infiltration basins
to treat the increased impervious surface area runoff.
A copy of the entire application may be examined or copied at the office of Jonathan R.
Howell, District Manager, Washington Regional Office, 943 Washington Square Mall,
Washington, NC, during normal business hours. Public comments received by 25 January 2019
will be considered. Later comments will be accepted and considered up to the time of permit
decision. Project modifications may occur based on further review and comments. Notice of the
permit decision in this matter will be provided upon written request.
Please publish on: 12 March 2020
Roy Brownlow
Coastal Management District Manager
NC Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City North Carolina 28557
[phone]
�DKQp
North CaMBnaDepartment of FnvironmentalQualiTy I Division of coastal Management
Washington Office 1 943 Washington SquareMall I Washington, North Carolina 278891252.946.6481
Wilmington Oftfce 1127 Cardinal, Drive Extension I Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 1910.796,7215
Morehead City Office 1 400 Commerre.Avenue I Morehead City. North Carolina 285571 25Z808.W08

New Bern Riverfront
Convention Center
Owner/Developer:
Craven County
406 Craven Street
New Bern, NC 28560
`�O .•��Sc��.°9 4
.Q SEAL
19043
ENGINEERING RECEIVED
801 E. Washington Street Phone: [phone]
PO Box 1108 Fax: [phone]
Nashville, NC 27856 Mobile: [phone] MAR 0 2 ?P/ 1
Email: [e-mail]
DCM-MHD CITY

•
NMR-16h,
ENGINEERING
nslq+.ir�.q Pn= F..rwre, ro9a�
TABLE OF CONTENTS
. _fr/TT�
Site Location
Project Description
Stormwater Management
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
USGS Map
NRCS Soils Report
FEMA Floodplain Map
Geotechs Soils Report
NOAA Precipitation Data
CALCULATIONS
Infiltration Basin Design Worksheet
Curve Number Calculations
Stormwater Routing
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2'1020
DCM-MHD CITY

Site Location
203 S. Front St. New Bern, NC 28560.
From US HWY 70 East take E Front Street to the North across the Trent River. Turn left onto S. Front
Street and the destination is immediately on the Left.
Project Description
The existing New Bern Riverfront Convention Center is enlarging their outdoor patio space. Stocks
Engineering is contracted with the Oakley Collier Architects for the civil engineering aspects of the design
and permitting process. The proposed multi -level patio will increase the amount of impervious surface on
the site and two infiltration basins are proposed to treat the increased impervious area.
Stormwater Management Plan
The onsite soil consists of loamy sand to sand. The soil is Seabrook -Urban land complex (A Soils)
Soils information was obtained through the NRCS website:
htp•//websoilsurvey.nres.usda.aov/app/ for Wake County.
The site currently drains directly into the Trent River which is a tributary to the Neuse River.
The proposed site improvements increase the onsite impervious area 2,274.28 SF. The site design
provides two small infiltration basins that will treat 5,838.38 SF of total drainage area, 5,553.9 SF of which
is impervious. The infiltration basins trap the 1.5 - INCH storm and allows the runoff to infiltrate the natural
ground at a rate of 1.1 IN/HR.
Post -development runoff is less than pre -development because of the addition of the infiltration basins.
The impervious area that will drain into the existing stormwater control measures was reduced by
3,279.62 SF.
RECEIVED
MAP 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
USGS Map
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 294
DCM.MHD CITY

I
NEW BERN QUADRANGLE
NORTH CAROLINA
7.5-MINUTE SERIES
-77.0000•
14 15 16 17 35.1250'
n Bridgeton-- 5 W
�y y 88
13
N� ar
aK�u-
f7 Et•5 2,'
� � V JOHNS T b
3 BROAD.ST M 87
� A
��SINDYPo/N7
SITE ao
FOLLOCK S7
pR '" ,Z SFRO o
'! Son
Teek Union on ! - Point Fjo int�-
�
6
,
g
Alfred A
Cunningham '" ...
Bridge
17 +�
au-
i yu 85
1 � -
to o f,
P.,
Ci Green
,' ic¢iid cla-wiu/,µ ` ! - Spring POint 84
iR0 G GRFFp �
n
RECEIVED
.._ Fart
§7 $i Point
MAR 0 2 2U20
'�iDCWMH CITY
�
l� ONTRO-
M
�.eonar

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
NRCS Soils Report
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

ev
va
n
+W
ul
"W
it
fS
�WP
m
ul
I
IS
�W
u�
YO
dl
Ul
vo
PS
ul •'r
u�
~ uop0�y
;a
J iL -
" �
6
"W
,
ra
r'
-i
VNIIOHVO HIUON 'AlNnoo
N3AVb-J'
Pn
JS 1`
JS
I
NJ`
+
9"1
N131
GAL
yr
1
'`A

USDA United States
A product of the National
Custom Soil Resource
Department of
Cooperative Soil Survey,
Agriculture
a joint effort of the United
Report for
K
N^��
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Craven County
Federal agencies, State
,
Natural
Resources
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
North Carolina
Conservation
Stations, and local
Service
participants
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY
December 17, 2019

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including fanners, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (hftp:/Avww.nres.usda.govtwps/
portal/nres/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(hftps://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/1
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a RECEIVEC~
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
MAR 02 21:-
DCM-MHD CITY

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 Z020
DCM-MHD CITY

Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................
2
How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5
SoilMap..................................................................................................................
8
SoilMap................................................................................................................9
Legend................................................................................................................10
MapUnit Legend................................................................................................
11
MapUnit Descriptions.........................................................................................11
Craven County, North Carolina.......................................................................13
So--Seabrook-Urban land complex............................................................13
W—Water....................................................................................................14
Soil Information for All Uses...............................................................................15
Soil Properties and Qualities..............................................................................15
Soil Qualities and Features.............................................................................15
Hydrologic Soil Group (New Bern Riverfront Convention Center)...............15
References............................................................................................................20
RL:. -c ED
MA, 0 2 Z020
DCM-MHD CITY

How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verity predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil -landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the RECEIVED
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

3 ElTN
3P 67N
Custom Soil Resource Report
h Soil Map ;
a
N (N
3142V, 314 31M
3
h
- Map Sole: 1:1,120 if pnn�d on A palraR (8.5"zit")sheet.
N Meb s
0 18 30 60 80
A0 9J 100 210 30D
Map p*d1w: Nkb Meotrlr Con cxrdilats: W 584 Edge ft: UIM Zm 18N W(S84
s
314W
314
3
Fr
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY
3 6'lTN
I
35 GTN

Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND
MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
IN
Spoil Area
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
f7
Area of Interest (AOI)
0
Stony Spot
1:24,000.
Soils
0
Soil Map Unit Polygonsons
Very Stony Spot
Warning: P Y Soil Ma may not be valid at this scale.
Wet Spot
,.y
Soil Map Unit Lines
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
Soil Map Unit Points
v
Other
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
.�
Special Line Features
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
Special
Point Features
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
(e,
Blowout
Water Features
scale.
®
Borrow Pit
v
Streams and Canals
Clay Spot
Transportation
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
f44
Rails
measurements.
0
Closed Depression
N
Interstate Highways
Gravel Pk
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
ti
US Routes
Web Soil Survey URL:
Gravelly Spot
Major Roads
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
0
Landfill
Local Roads
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
A.Lava
Flow
Background
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Marsh or swamp
.
Aerial Photography
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
a*
Mine or Quarry
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
0
Miscellaneous Water
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
0
Perennial Water
of the version date(s) listed below.
V
Rock Outcrop
Soil Survey Area: Craven County, North Carolina
+
Saline Spot
Survey Area Data: Version 22, Sep 16, 2019
Sandy Spot
RECEM0
R�
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
4W
Severely Eroded Spot
1:60,000 or larger.
0
Sinkhole
MAR 0 2 ZGZG
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Mar 7, 2015-0ct 30,
�p
Slide or Slip
2017
jV
SodicSpot
hl HD CITY [�CiM'
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident
10

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol I Map Unit Name I Acres in AOI I Percent of AOI
Seabrook -Urban land complex
5.3
99.9%
LSc
W
Water
0.0
0.1%
Totals for Area of Interest
1 &31
100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
11 DCM-MHD Crry

Custom Soil Resource Report
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
Craven County, North Carolina
Sc—Seabrook-Urban land complex
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wgs
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Seabrook and similar soils: 50 percent
Urban land: 35 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transacts of the mapunit.
Description of Seabrook
Setting
Landform: Depressions on stream terraces, depressions on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material. Sandy fluviomarine deposits and/or eolian sands
Typical profile
A - 0 to 8 inches: loamy sand
C - 8 to 81 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class. Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (5.95
to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 24 to 42 inches
Frequency of flooding: Rare
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 3.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating. No
Description of Urban Land
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8
Hyddc soil rating: No RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
13 DCM-MHD CITY

Custom Soil Resource Report
Minor Components
Leon
Percent of map unit., 5 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Hydric soil rating: Yes
W—Water
Map Unit Composition
Water: 100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transacts of the mapunit.
Description of Water
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8w
Hydric soil rating: No
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY
14

Soil Information for All Uses
Soil Properties and Qualities
The Soil Properties and Qualities section includes various soil properties and
qualities displayed as thematic maps with a summary table for the soil map units in
the selected area of interest. A single value or rating for each map unit is generated
by aggregating the interpretive ratings of individual map unit components. This
aggregation process is defined for each property or quality.
Soil Qualities and Features
Soil qualities are behavior and performance attributes that are not directly
measured, but are inferred from observations of dynamic conditions and from soil
properties. Example soil qualities include natural drainage, and frost action. Soil
features are attributes that are not directly part of the soil. Example soil features
include slope and depth to restrictive layer. These features can greatly impact the
use and management of the soil.
Hydrologic Soil Group (New Bern Riverfront
Convention Center)
Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are
assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the
soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation
from long -duration storms.
The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and
three dual classes (AID, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows:
Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly
wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or
gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission.
Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These
consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained
soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils RECEIVED
have a moderate rate of water transmission.
MAR 0 2 2020
15
I)CM-MHD CITY

Custom Soil Resource Report
Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist
chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or
soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water
transmission.
Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when
thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell
potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at
or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material.
These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission.
If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (AID, BID, or CID), the first letter is
for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their
natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes.
RECEIVED
MWR 0 `*2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY
16

3 61T N
35" V W N
Custom Soil Resource Report
ti Map —Hydrologic Soil Group (New Bern Riverfront Convention Center)
a
qN (N
h 1:
U4240 314 3143DD 314330 3143M
3
h
Map Scale: l:ivurcrlWoNnro"ca.s^><u^tsi66c
N McUn
0 15 30 W W
A 0
0 W ,W 2'10 3W
Map projecbon: Web Mercator CnrrwrcDadire�: W(584 Ed9eda: UTM 7.one 18N WGSM
17
314M
3144M
3
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY
3 617N
I
376VN

MAPLEGEND
Area of Interest (A01)
O Area of Interest (AOI)
Sails
Soil Rating Polygons
o A
0 AID
Q B
0 BID
0
Q CID
o D
Q Not rated or not available
Soil Rating Lines
N A
AID
py B
ry BID
C
ry CID
N D
I Not rated or not available
Soil Rating Points
■ A
■ AID
■ B
■ BID
Custom Soil Resource Report
o c
13 CID
■ D
I, Not rated or not available
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
1-f-f Rails
N Interstate Highways
wr US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
. Aenal Photography
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Craven County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 22, Sep 16, 2019
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Mar 7, 2015—Oct 30,
2017
v11A-IVi hl D CITY r The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
v compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
18

Custom Soil Resource Report
Table —Hydrologic Soil Group (New Bern Riverfront Convention
Center)
Map unit symbol Map unk name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
Sc Seabrook -Urban land A 5.3 99.9%
complex
W— _ Water _ _ _ _ _ _ 0.0 0.1%
Totals for Area of Interest 5.3 100.0%
Rating Options —Hydrologic Soil Group (New Bern Riverfront
Convention Center)
Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition
Component Percent Cutoff., None Specified
Tie -break Rule: Higher
RECEIVED
P, 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY
19

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http:/Iwww.nres.usda.govtwps/portal/
n res/detai I/nabonal/soils/?cid=n resl42p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portaVnres/detaiVnabonal/soils/?cid=nresl42p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_O53580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national8anduse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084
RECEIVED
20 MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrrs.usda.govtwps/portal/
nres/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nres 142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nros.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid=n res 142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/lntemettFSE—DOCUMENTS/nrcsl42p2_052290.pdf
RECEIVED
MAN 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY
21

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
FEMA Floodplain Map
DECEIVED
0 P 2020
UCnp-MWD Ciry

.. t � ii } e 'f. t

is
At
�� '.t •,� ."" �o `Scot{s
e l
1-� yea D' •'r- .�
RP Si, W1r d ly .4.+fin e �ln• �`/ ..
,ts �,��'6aseYF t,�i 1� •' �.r �i
0
ou9\as
dV iN1 1. fib, _
, ifr 1 "'�/r1"�c WIII}ams Rd
•Yelth
� 1
10
i'.: AF8892

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
Geotechs Soils Report
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 ZRO
DCM-MHD CITY

STEWART
STRONGER BY DESIGN
August 27, 2019
Craig Wilke
Craven County Finance Department
406 Craven Street
New Bern, NC 28560
Re: Craven County Convention Center
203 S. Front Street
New Bern, NC
In -situ Infiltration Testing
Dear Mr. Wilke,
Raleigh - Geotech/CMT Lab 5400 Old Poole Road
T 919.380.8750 Raleigh, NC 27610
GEOTECHNICAL ADDENDUM NO. 1
As requested, Stewart has completed infiltration testing for the above -referenced project. This letter describes
the testing performed and resulting data.
Infiltration testing was performed at two locations as shown on the attached plan.
Infiltration testing was performed using a Guelph Permeameter, which is a field-testing device that measures the
in -situ, steady-state rate of water recharge under a constant -head condition. The infiltration tests for both
locations were performed in a 6 cm diameter hand auger boring advanced to depth of 12 inches below the
current ground surface. Two tests were performed per location to allow averaging of the data. The average
infiltration rates for locations I-1 and I-2 were 5.5 in/hr and 1.1 in/hr, respectively. The soil encountered at the
test locations was fill material and visually -manually classified as Silty SAND (USCS Class: SM). The soil at I-2
appeared to have slightly more fines (slit/clay) than I-1.
Since the near surface soil in this area is relatively recent fill, likely placed during construction of the Convention
Center, the usual identifiers of the seasonal high water table (SHWT) were not present. However, the soil test
borings performed during our subsurface exploration in May 2019 indicate that the groundwater was at a depth
of 5 feet below the current ground surface in this portion of the site. The water table is expected to undergo tidal
Fluctuation due to its proximity to the river and groundwater mounding likely occurs during periods of heavy rain
at high tide stage. This being the case, it is reasonable to estimate the SHWT in this portion of the site is at or
very near the current ground surface.
We trust that this letter is responsive to your needs at this time. If you have any questions, please feel free to
call me.
Respectfully,
STEWART
4 Z__�_ RECEIVED
Don Brown, P.E., LEED AP MAR 0 2 2020
Practice Leader, Geotechnical & Construction Services
attachment: Testing Location Plan DCM-MHD CITY
WWW.STEWARTINC.COM CHARLOTTE / DURHAM / RALEIGH / WILMINGTON / COLUMBIA, SC

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
NOAA Precipitation Data
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 ZOZU
DCM-MHD CITY

NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 2, Version 3 NEW BERN
FAA AIRPORT
Station ID: 31-6108
Location name: New Bern, North Carolina, USA' e`t
Latitude: 35.0667°, Longitude:-77.05°
Elevation:
Elevation (station metadata): 16 ft••�'`•° ^"'f
source: ESRI Maps
"source: USGS
POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES
G.M. Bonnin, D. Mamn, B. Lin, T. Parzybok, M.Yekta, and D. Riley
NOAA, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, Maryland
PF tabular I PF graW&al I MARS & aerials
PF tabular
PDS-based point precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (in inches)1
Average recurrence interval ears
Duration
���
10F
25
1
200
500
1000
0.481
0.563
0.647
0.732
0.82B
0.904
0.979
1.08
1.15
1.23
5yW
0.442-0.525
0.519-0.614)
(0.595-0.704
0,672-0.796
0.753-0.897
0.8226.982
0.885-1.08
0.946-1.15
1.02-1.25
1.09-1.35
0.788
0.901
1.04
1.17 7F
1.32
F 1.56
1.67
1.82
1.94
10-min
0.706-0439
0.830-0.981
0.953-1.13
1.07-1.27
1.20-1.43
1.31-1.6
1.41-1.69
1.50.1.82
1.62-1.98
1.71-2.12
0.961
1.13
1.31
1.48
1.67
1.82
1.97
2.11
2.29
2.44
15-min
0.882-1.05
1.04-1.23
1.21-1.43)
1 (1.36-1.61)
11.52-1.81
1.66-1.98
1.78-2.14
1.89-2.29
2.03-2.49
2.15-2.66)
-7-7F27
24
3.
---95-
30-min
1.21-37244
1.445770
1.71 2603
1.97 2533
225-2.68
2. 0 2598
2.723 27
295-3.57
3. 4-3.96
3 1
60-min
1 51-11..79
1.81 2614
2. 0 296
2.5E 394)
3.00 3957
3.5<.4
37 5-4.51
4: 3-5.00
4.64-5.69
5.08 6630
2-hr
180.2.17
2.17 2861
2. 0 3624
3.2 3388
3.87-4.67
(4A55 40
5056.15
5.676.5
6.6-8.13
7.32 9919
3-hr
193-2.37
2.34 2785
2. 23 58
3. 9-4 27
4. 55?21
4.4-58.08
5. 6-37701
6.428003
7. 2 9553
8. 0-610.9
6-hr
23
2. 2 2789
2.81 306
(3.504.35)
4. 05
5: 3-6.41
59 8-7.51
6.868.6G
7. 2 959E
9.170- 1.6
10.4-3.6
12-hr
2.72 3342
3.29-4.12
4. 25918)
4.97 6627)
6: 0-7.73
7: 5-9.10
8.24 10.E
9.4412.2)
11 2-14.7
12 7517.0
24-hr
3. 0-3.90
3. 9-4.75
5.02 6312
5. 5---7928
7.32 9601
8. 6---110.5
9.71- 2.1
11 0-14.0
12 9-16.7
14.6- 9.1
4.08
4.94
6.35
7.55
9.37
11.0
12.7
14.7
17.7
20.2
2 day
3.68-4.56
4.40.5.52
5.71-7.09
6.77-8.41
8.34-10.4
9.67-12.1
11.1-14.1
12.7-16.3
15.0-19.7
17.022.7
3 day
39 3-4.81
4. 65 82
6.07 7.44
7: 68.79
87410.8
10.1� 2.5
11 5314.4
13.0. 6.5
15.3-19.9
17 20 2.8
4dey
4. 85908
5.0E 6612
6. 30.79
.54 9317
9.14-11.2
10.b--12.9
11 9314.7
13 3-16.7
15.6- 0.0
17.5- 2.8
5.3E
6.47
8.13
9.50
11.5
13.1
14.8
16.8
19.5
21.9
7-0ey
4 91-5.88
5.93-7.09
7.43-8.90
8.6-10.4
10.412.E
11.8-14A
13.3-16.3
14.9-18.5
17.0-21.6
18.8-24.3
10-dey
5.57 6?64
6.68-76.95
8.27 9?85
9.56-11.4
11 413.7
12.9- 5.5
14.4617.E
16.0.19.8
18?2-23.0
2 0325.7
20-day
E-14.7
7. 9-i8.84
9.04-1 0.5
11 0-12.8
12•
14.1617.3
165-19.5
18?3-21.8
20.1?24.3
22?6-27.9
24 630.8
10.1
12.0
14.4
16.3
19.0
21.2
23.4
25.6
28.7
31.1
30day
9.37-10.8
11.1-12.9
13.4-15.5
15.2-17.6
17.6-20.5
19.522.8
21.425.2
23.3-27.7
25.9-31.2
27.8-34.0
45-day
11.7?13.5
13.8- 6.0
16.15-19.1
18.7-21.7
21?6- 5.3
24 0- 8.2
26 531.3
2 9134.E
32 339.2
3438-42.9
60-day
12
14 1616.1
8.1E 19.1
19 6.5)
22-.5
0 2522
27 9.0
2LL32.0
30.1? 5.1)
32 8538.3
35 842.8
38 2-46.0
1 Precipitation frequency (PF) estimates in this table are based on frequency analysis of partial duration series (PDS).
Numbers in parenthesis are PF estimates at lower and upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval. The probability that precipitation frequency
estimates (for a given duration and average recurrence interval) will be greater than the upper bound (or less then the lower bound) is 5%. Estimates at
upper bounds are not chocked against probable maximum precipitation (PMP) estimates and may be higher than currently valid PMP values.
Please refer to NOAA Atlas 14 document for more information.
Back to Top RECEIVED
PF graphical
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

PDS-based depth -duration -frequency (DDF) curves
Latitude: 35.06670, Longitude:-77.05000
45
35
.
..
c
30
..
..
..
a
:
v 25
...:....:..
........:.....:...;...
.... ...... ......
:.....�.-'..i..
O
' 20
-
............
S
10
5
....:....:
..... : ..
a_• .}
............
;..
0
T
A
N
M
m~
N
tL lit Q
vM
1�
222ITafff
Duration
d
N
........ ..........:. .......:.....
NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 2, Version 3
Average recurrence interval (years)
Average recurrence
interval
(years)
— 1
2
— g
10
25
5o
100
— 200
— Soo
— 1000
Duration
- 5-min
— 2-day
— 10-min
— 3-day
15-min
— 4-day
— 30-min
— 7-day
— 60-min
— 10-day
— 2-hr
— 20-0ay
— 3-nr
— 3ocay
— "f
— 4bday
— 12-hr
— 60-day
— 24-tu
Created (GMT); Tue Dec 17 19:08:38 2019
Back to p
Maps & aerials
Small scale terrain
RECEIVE®
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITy

Large scale map
Rocky NlixAnt
Gre ,Alle
0
ra". c I
Sove.0
JacksonvUle
a
I :Waq
K
YEN
CO RGNL
AMPORT
2mi
Large scale terrain
lurbarn Rocky Mount L4
Raleigh
eville
Jac
Wilrring Onslow
$a Ba),
e
100km
fi0Mi
xo
Perham
Raleigh
la XFetteNville
0
Wilmington
0
1001km
60mi
Large scale aerial
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

Backto Top
US DeoaMDtnt of Commerce
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Weather Service
National Water Center
1325 East West Highway
Silver Spring, MD 20910
Questions?: [e-mail]
Disclaimer
RECEIVED
MAR 09 )0
DCM-MHD CITY

NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 2, Version 3
Location name: New Bern, North Carolina, USA`
Latitude: 35.1035°, Longitude:-77.0371°
Elevation: 6.95 ft"
p �:
1
' source: ESRI Maps
s�
"source: USGS
POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES
G.M. Bannin, D. Martin, B. Lin, T. Parzybok, M.Yekta, and D. Riley
NOAA, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, Maryland
PF tabular I PF grrgphica Maps & aerials
PF tabular
PDS-based point precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (in Inches/hour)1
Average
recurrence interval (years)
Duretion
1
2
5
10
25
50
100
200 �
500 �
1000
0
5.77
8.78
7.75
8.77
9.90
10.8
11.7
12.8
13.8
44.8
5-min
5.29-6.30
6.22-7.36
7.13-8.44
8.04-9.54
9.01-10.8
9.8511.8
(10.6-12.6)
(11.3-13.7
12.2-15.0
13.0-16.2
4.61
5.40
6.21
7.01
7.887F
8.63
9.32
10.0
10.9
11.6
10-min
4.22-5.03
4.97-5.89
5.71-6.76
6A3-7.63
7.19-8.57)
7.84-9.38
8.42-10.1
8.98-10.9
9.67-11.9
10.3-12.7
4
4.52
15-ntin
3. 2--4.19
4 4.16 .93
4.87�70
5. 2 8?44
6.07-67624)
6.62 7892
(7. 0 8654)
(7.55 9?16
(8. 2 9.96)
(8.58 10.6
2.63
3.13
3.72
4.29
4.94
5.49
6.02
6.56
7.27
7.88
30-min
2.41-2.87
(2.88-3.41)
(3.424.05
3.93-4.66
4.50-5.36)
(4.98-5.96)
115.43-6.54
5.88-7.13
6.46-7.92
6.95-8.62
1.64
1.96
2.38
2.79
3.29
3.72
4.14
4.60
5.21
5.76
80-min
1.51-1.79
(1.80-2.14)
(2.19-2.59
2.56-3.04
2.99-3.57
3.38-0.04
3.74-4.51
4.12-5.00
4.63-5.68
5.07-6.29
0.983
1.19
1.48
1.76
2.13
2.46
2.81
3.18
3.71
4.18
2-hr
0.896-1.08)
1.08-1.30)
1,35-1.62
1.60-1.93
1.93-2.33
2.22-2.69
2.513.07
(2.82-3.47)
(3.264.05
3.644.58
3-hr
0.842-0 788
0.776-0.947
0.96 -1.18
1.16-1842
IA1--1773
- 1.64-2.02
1: 8-2.33
2: 3-2.67
2. 93.18
2. 23.63
0.428
0.516
0.845
0.777
0.955
1.12
1.30
1.49
1.77
2.03
6-hr
0.387-0.482
0.467-0.579
0.582-0.725
0.699-0.872
0.853-1.07
0.994-1.25
1.14-1.44
1.30-1.66
1.52-1.97
1.73-2.27
0.250
F 0.302
F 0.380
0.460
0.569
0.671
0.761
0.904
1.09
1.25
12-hr
0.22&0.283
0.272-0.341
0.341-0.428)
0.411-0.518
0.504-0.639
0.590-0.752
0.680-0.874
0.780-1.01
(0.921-1.21)
J(1.05-1.41)
0.146
0.178
0.230
0.274
0.339
0.395
0.457
0.526
0.628
0.716
24hr jF
0.133-0.162)
0.162-0.197
0.209-0.255
0.248-0.303
0.305-0.374
0.352-0.436
0.404-0.504
0.459-0.580
0.539-0.695
(0.606-0.795)
0.085
0.103
0.132
0.157
0.195 IF
0.228
0.264
0.305
0.367
0.421
2-day
(0.077-0.095)
1(0.093-0.115
0.119-0.147
0.141-0.175
0.174-0.216
0.201-0.252
0.231-0.293
0.264-0.339
0.313-0.410
0.353-0.472
0.282
3-day
0055-0 067
0066-0 081
O,OW 03
0.099 0.0122
0.121' O..1149
0.140-0 173
0.159-0 200
0.18 -0.229
0.2112-0 275
0.238-0 315
4-dey
0.044-0 053
0053-0.084
0.067--0 081
0.078 0 095)
0.095-0816
0.109-0.134
0.123-0g 53
0.1390.174
(0.1620 207)1(0.187-0
237
0.032
0.038
0.048
0.056
0.088
0.078
0.088
0.100
0.118
0.130
7-day
0.029-0.035
0.0350.042
0.044-0.053
0.051-0.062
0.062-0.074
0.070-0.085
0.079-0.097
0.D88-0.109
0.101-0.128
0.112-0.144
10 aay
0023-0 028
0028-0033
00340.041
0.040- 047
0.04 -0 057
0054-0065
0.060-0 073
006 -0 082
0076-0 095
(0093-0..106
0.017
0.020
0.025
0.028
0.033
0.037
0.042
0.046
0.053
0.058
20-day
0.016-0.018
0.019-0.022
0.023-0.027)
0.026-0.030
0.031-0.036
0.034-0.041
0.038-0.045
0.042-0.051
0.047-0.058
(0.051-0.064
0.014
0.017
0.020
0.023
0.026
0.029
0.032
0.035
0.040
0.043
30-day
0.013-0.015
0.015-0.018
0.019-0.021
0.021-0.024
(0.024-0.028)
(0.027-0.032)1(0.030-0.035
0.032-0.038
0.036-0.043
0.039-0.047
O.01012
013-0
19
45i18y
0
00.29
015
0001 0 018
0001 �0 020
0.020-0 023
0022-0 026
0024-0 029
00 2700 032
0030-0 036
0032-0.040
60day
0.010-0 011
LO112--0 013
00014-0 016
LO 5-0017
0077-0020
0.0019--0 022
0021 A 024
0.023-0 026
0.025-0029
0028-0 032
t Precipitefion frequency (PF) estimates in this table are based on frequency analysis of partial duretion series (PDS).
Numbers in parenthesis are PF estimates at lower and upper bounds of the 90% confidence Interval. The probability that precipitation frequency estimates (for a
given duration and average recurrence Interval) will be greater than the upper bound (or less than the lower bound) is 5%. Estimates at upper bounds are not
checked against probable maximum precipitation (PIMP) estimates and may be higher than currently valid PMP values.
Please refer to NOAA Alias 14 document for more information.
Back to p. RECEIVED
PF graphical
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

PDS-based intensity -duration -frequency (IDF) curves
Latitude: 35.10350, Longitude:-77.03710
100.00
10.00
........
..... ........ .... ..
iv
c
0
'D
a
U
0.10
....:....:.....:.....:.....:...
..
6
0.01
Duration
Average recurrence interval (years)
NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 2, Version 3 Created (GMT): Tue Dec 17 19:09:58 2019
Back to Toa
Maps & aerials
Small scale terrain
Average recu
Inlerral
(years)
— 1
2
5
10
25
so
100
200
Soo
1000
Duration
— 5-min
— 2-day
— lo+ron
— 3-day
16min
— 4-day
— 30-min
— 7-day
— 60min
— 10-day
— 2-41r
— 20-day
— 3a1r
— 30-day
— "r
— 46-03y
— 12-br
— 60-day
— 24-W
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

a
71
I ,
0
3km
L COR y ... ,.
2mi AIRPORT
_ Large scale terrain
O s or
r
Large scale map
I
Jacksonville
Wilmington
n
100km
60mi
Large scale aerial
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

Back to Top
US Deoanment of Commerce
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Weather Service
National Water Center
1325 East West Highway
Silver Spring, MD 20910
Questions?: [e-mail]
Disclaimer
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

CALCULATIONS
Infiltration Basin Design Worksheet
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

•
ENGINEERING
Infiltration Basin Design
Project:
New Bern Convention Center
Location:
New Bern, NC
Date:
16-Dec-19
Basin ID:
1.00
Drainage Area (A)
Impervious Area
% Impervious (1)
0.04 Acres
0.04 Acres
100.00%
Infiltration Basin Area (IBA) 1 214.82 SF
Water Quality Volume
Calculate Rv: Rv = 0.05+.9 X I
Rv = 0.95
WQV= 3630XRDXRvXA
Ro = 1.50 Inch
WQV = 207 CF
Surface Area
SA=FS* DV*12
K*T
SA = 62.7
Depth of Infiltration Basin:
Volume of Voids = Vtot -0.6 * Vtot = Wqv
Vtot * (1 - 0.6) = 207
Vtot = 1 517.28 = IBA * Depth
Depth = Vtot / IBA
Depth = 2.41
NOTE: Infiltration Basin Area is smaller than
the stone surface area. The IBA assumes
the patio Tooter extends 1.5' off the wall.
FS = Factor of Safety
DV = Volume
K=
T = Max Time
Min.
CF
M
IN/HR
Hours
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2. 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

Permit
(to be provltled by DW(y
©*A//�� 020�E W 'A�rZ9
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM o��
NCDENR 401 CERTIFICATION APPLICATION FORM
INFILTRATION BASIN SUPPLEMENT
This form must be filled out, printed and submitted.
The Required Items Checklist (Part ill) must be printed, filled out and submitted along with all of the required information.
I. PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Name New Berm Riverside Convention Center Renovations- Phase 2
Contact Person Kevin Vamell
Phone Number 252.459.8196
Date 1/29/2020
Drainage Area Number 1
IL DESIGN INFORMATION
Site Characteristics
Drainage area
1,742.00
ftz
Impervious area
1,742.00
ftz
Percent impervious
1D0.00
%
Design rainfall depth
1.50
in
Peak Flow Calculations
1-yr, 24-hr rainfall depth
1-yr, 24-hr intensity
Pre -development 1-yr, 24-hr discharge
Post -development 1-yr, 24-hr discharge
Pre/Post 1-yr, 24-hr peak flow control
Storage Volume: Non -SA Waters
Minimum design volume required
Design volume provided
Storage Volume: SA Waters
1.5' runoff volume
Pre -development 1-yr, 24-hr runoff volume
Post -development 1-yr, 24-hr runoff volume
Minimum required volume
Volume provided
Soils Report Summary
Soil type
Infiltration rate
SHWf elevation
Basin Design Parameters
Drawdown time
Basin side slopes
Basin bottom elevation
Storage elevation
Storage Surface Area
Top elevation
Basin Bottom Dimensions
Basin length
Basin width
Bottom Surface Area
3.52
in
0.15
in/br
0.26
ft lsec
0.02
ft3/sec
-0.24
folsec
fl3
fl3
207.00
fl3
108.00
fl3
492.00
rya
384.00
fi3
837.00
fl3 OK
Sandy
1.10
in81r
-1.00
fmsl
3.00 days
3.00
:1
3.79
fmsl
6.20
fmsl
214.82
f?
6.20
fmsl
52.00 it
5.82 ft
214.82 it,
OK
OK
OK
RECEIVED
W': p Z an
C)CM-MHD CITY
Fonn SW401-Infiltration Basin-Ray.5 11Apr2011 IParts I. & It. Design Summary, Page 1 of 3

Permit No.
(to be pmvlded by DWO)
Additional Information
Maximum runoff to each inlet to the basin?
0.06
aGin
OK
Length of vegetative filter for overflow
52.00
ft
OK
Distance to structure
NA
ft
OK
Distance from surface waters
50.00
ft
OK
Distance from water supply well(s)
NA
ft
OK
Separation from impervious soil layer
NA
ft
OK
Naturally occudngsoil above shwt
2.41
ft
OK
Bottom covered with 4-in of clean sand?
NA
(Y or N)
OK
Proposed drainage easement provided?
Y
(Y or N)
OK
Capures all runoff at ultimate build -out?
Y
(Y or N)
OK
Bypass provided for larger storms?
Y
(Y or N)
OK
Pretreatment device provided
No
RECEIVED
MAN 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY
Form SW401-Infiltration Basin-Rev.5 i tApr2011 Parts I. a 11. Design Summary, Page 2 of 3

Permit No.
(to be provided by DWQ)
III. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate the page or plan sheet numbers where the supporting documentation can be found. An incomplete submittal package will
result in a request for additional information. This will delay final review and approval of the project. Initial in the space provided to
indicate the following design requirements have been met. If the applicant has designated an agent, the agent may initial below. If a
requirement has not been met, attach justification.
Pagel Plan
Initials Sheet No.
JKV CE-04 1. Plans (1" - 50' or larger) of the entire site showing:
- Design at ultimate build -out,
- Off -site drainage (if applicable),
- Delineated drainage basins (include Rational C coefficient per basin),
- Basin dimensions,
- Pretreatment system,
- High flow bypass system,
- Maintenance access,
- Proposed drainage easement and public right of way (ROW),
- Overflow device, and
- Boundaries of drainage easement.
JKV CE-04 2. Partial plan (1" = 30' or larger) and details for the infiltration basin showing:
- Bypass structure,
- Maintenance access,
- Basin bottom dimensions,
- Basin cross-section with benchmark for sediment cleanout,
- Flow distribution detail for inflow,
- Vegetated filter, and
- Pretreatment device.
JKV CE-04 3. Section view of the infiltration basin (1" = 20' or larger) showing:
- Pretreatment and treatment areas, and
- Inlet and outlet structures.
JKV CE-04 4. A table of elevations, areas, incremental volumes & accumulated volumes to verify, the volume provided.
JKV CE-04 5. A soils report that is based upon an actual field investigation, soil borings, and infiltration tests. The
results of the soils report must be verified in the field by DWQ, by completing & submitting the soils
investigation request form. County soil maps are not an acceptable source of soils information.
JKV D-01 6. A construction sequence that shows how the infitlration basin will be protected from sediment until the
entire drainage area is stabilized.
JKV CALCS 7. The supporting calculations.
JKV OM 8. A copy of the signed and notarized operation and maintenance (0&M) agreement.
JKV NA 9. A copy of the deed restrictions (if required).
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY
Form SW401-Infiftmtion Basin-Rev.4 Page 3 of 3 Part III. Required Items Checklist, Page 3 of 3

•
ENGINEERING
Infiltration Basin Design
Project:
New Bern Convention Center
Location:
New Bern, NC
Date:
16-Dec-19
Basin ID:
2.00
Drainage Area (A)
Impervious Area
% Impervious (1)
0.10 Acres
0.09 Acres
92.88%
Infiltration Basin Area (IBA) 1 346.30 SF
Water Qualitv Volume
Calculate Rv: Rv = 0.05+.9 X I
Rv = 0.89
WQV = 3630 X RD X Rv X A
Ro = 1.50 Inch
WC V = 486 CF
Surface Area
* DV*12
SA=FS
K*T
SA = 147.3
Depth of Infiltration Basin:
Volume of Voids = Vtot -0.6 * Vtot = Wqv
Vtot * (1 - 0.6) = 486
Vtot = 1 1215.61 = IBA * Depth
Depth = Vtot I IBA
Depth = 3.51
NOTE: Infiltration Basin Area is smaller than
the stone surface area. The IBA assumes
the footer extends 1.5' off the wall.
FS = Factor of Safety
DV = Volume
K=
T = Max Time
200
Min.
48t4
CF
1.1
IN/HR
72
Hours
RECEIVED
MAN 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

Permit No.
(to be provided by DWQ)
AA
orOf 'WA\rrf;9 c
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
NCDENR
401 CERTIFICATION APPLICATION FORM
INFILTRATION BASIN SUPPLEMENT
This form must be filled out, printed and submitted.
The Required Items
Checklist (Part III) must be printed, filled out and submitted along with all of the required information.
I. PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Name
New Berm Riverside Convention Canter Renovations - Phase 2
Contact Person
Kevin Vamell
Phone Number
252.459.8196
Date
1/29/2020
Drainage Area Number
_ 2
II. DESIGN INFORMATION
Site Characteristics
Drainage area
4,391.00 flz
Impervious area
4,078.00 e
Percent impervious
92.87 %
Design rainfall depth
1.50 in
Peak Flow Calculations
1-yr, 24-hr rainfall depth
1-yr, 24-hr intensity
Pre -development 1-yr, 24-hr discharge
Post -development 1-yr, 24-hr discharge
Pre/Post 1-yr, 24-hr peak flow control
Storage Volume: Non -SA Waters
Minimum design volume required
Design volume provided
Storage Volume: SA Waters
1.5' runoff volume
Pre -development 1-yr, 24-hr runoff volume
Post -development 1-yr. 24-hr runoff volume
Minimum required volume
Volume provided
Soils Report Summary
Soil type
Infiltration rate
SH WT elevation
Basin Design Parameters
Drawdewn time
Basin side slopes
Basin bottom elevation
Storage elevation
Storage Surface Area
Top elevation
Basin Bottom Dimensions
Basin length
Basin width
Bottom Surface Area
3.52
in
0.15
irvhr
0.26
ft /sec
0.02
ft'/sec
-0.24
ft/sec
to
ft3
486.00
ft,
108.00
ft3
492.00
ft,
486.00
ft'
837.00
1113 OK
Sandy
1.10
inthr
-1.00
fmsl
3.00 days OK
3.00 :1 OK
1.49 final OK RECEIVED
5.00 final
600.00 flz
5.00 fmsl
50.00 ft
12.00 ft
600.00 f?
v".� lr 0 `A 2u20
DCM.MVID CITY
Form SW401-Infiamtion Basin -Revs 11Apr2011 Parts I. 611. Design Summary, Page 1 of 3

Permit No.
(to be provided by DWQ)
Additional Information
Maximum runoff to each inlet to the basin?
0.15
ac-in
OK
Length of vegetative filter for overflow
50.00
ft
OK
Distance to structure
NA
ft
OK
Distance from surface waters
50.00
It
OK
Distance from water supply well(s)
NA
it
OK
Separation from impervious soil layer
NA
ft
OK
Naturally occuring soil above shwt
2.00
ft
OK
Bottom covered with 4-in of clean sand?
NA
(Y or N)
OK
Proposed drainage easement provided?
Y
(Y or N)
OK
Capures all runoff at ultimate build -out?
Y
(Y or N)
OK
Bypass provided for larger storms?
Y
(Y or N)
OK
Pretreatment device provided
No
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 ZU20
DCM-Ii CITY
Forth SW401-Infiltration Basin-Rev.5 11Ap2011 Parts I. a II. Design Summary, Page 2 of 3

Permit
(to be provided by DWQ)
III. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate the page or plan sheet numbers where the supporting documentation can be found. An incomplete submittal package will
result in a request for additional information. This will delay final review and approval of the project. Initial in the space provided to
indicate the following design requirements have been met. If the applicant has designated an agent, the agent may initial below. If a
requirement has not been met, attach justification.
Pagel Plan
Initials
Sheet No.
JKV
CE-04
1. Plans (1" - 50' or larger) of the entire site showing:
- Design at ultimate build -out,
- Off -site drainage (if applicable),
- Delineated drainage basins (include Rational C coefficient per basin),
- Basin dimensions,
- Pretreatment system,
- High flow bypass system,
- Maintenance access,
- Proposed drainage easement and public right of way (ROW),
- Overflow device, and
- Boundaries of drainage easement.
JKV
CE-04
2. Partial plan (1" = 30' or larger) and details for the infiltration basin showing:
- Bypass structure,
- Maintenance access,
- Basin bottom dimensions,
- Basin cross-section with benchmark for sediment cleanout,
- Flow distribution detail for inflow,
- Vegetated filter, and
- Pretreatment device.
JKV
CE-04
3. Section view of the infiltration basin (1" = 20' or larger) shovdng:
- Pretreatment and treatment areas, and
- Inlet and outlet structures.
JKV
CE-04
4. A table of elevations, areas, incremental volumes & accumulated volumes to verify, the volume provided.
JKV CE-04 5. A soils report that is based upon an actual field investigation, soil borings, and infiltration tests. The
results of the soils report must be verified in the field by DWO, by completing & submitting the soils
investigation request form. County soil maps are not an acceptable source of soils information.
JKV D-01 6. A construction sequence that shows how the infitlration basin will be protected from sediment until the
entire drainage area is stabilized.
JKV CALCS 7. The supporting calculations.
JKV OM 8. A copy of the signed and notarized operation and maintenance (0&M) agreement. RECEIVED
JKV NA 9. A copy of the deed restrictions (if required).
MA 0 2 2020
CCM-MHD CITY
Form SW401-Infiltration Basin-Rev.4 Page 3 of 3 Part III. Required Items Checklist, Page 3 of 3

-RS
EACH FFE
,A 9.59' 9 9
54 -
\PATIO
PA 170: o4EpRp+r+P �
9.43
6 RISERS (R Pip INFILTRATION BASIN #1
® 6.> EACH ( 308 SF OF RIVER ROCK OVER THE
PA 770 215 SF INFILTRATION BASIN 2.41' /
9.20 IN DEPTH MIN. OF 407. VOIDS. SEE.
CROSS SECTION DETAIL.
PA 770 �
9.20 /
6�° ,
�4 FFE
9.59
SOD IhiR� % FFE FFE I
6.15 9.59 9.59 I
4' IASS CAPPED J
PE ORATED PVC PIPE I
IMT4610 PA 770 '- OBf RVATION WELL. gII I
9.20 TOP .t '6.10
li GS PA 770 IN 4.95PA PA 770 20 9.20 9.20� .20 0 5.9E ACH l-
IPA Tl
SO � _ 9.20 �W
6.09
SOD CONC.
6.08 F h 6.25
o �
TOW 6.00 CONC 0' HDPE
CRD f 6. 00 &07 �� �. A
TOW 6.00 OW
�\
GRD .t 5.61 T6 00 C.
GRD 5.00 6.13
TOW 6.00
5.03 TOW 6. GRD - 6.00
0 02` . \ GRD 5,45 i
TOW 6.00
�1N 1�t �pr1� GRD t 5.43
GRD 5.00
Nm.00 MATC,
m SW t
;- +
� GRD f 5.34
A ...... INFILTRATI
4" BRASS CA0ED _
- - RECEIVED ±600 SF
PERFORATED PVC PIPE 346 SF IP
OBSERVATION WELL. MAR 0 2 2020 DEPTH MII
TOP f 5.00 EX. DI CROSS SE
INV. 1.49 EX. TOP 5.15 DCM-MHD CITY

CALCULATIONS
Curve Number Calculations
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

ENG EERI NG
Curve Numbers
Project: New Bern Riverfront Convention Center
Location: New Bern, NC
Date: 17-Dec-19
Pre Development
Curve Number
Infiltration Basin
1
64.08
Infiltration Basin
2
72.45
Post Development
Curve Number
Infiltration Basin
1
6408
Infiltration Basin
2
64.08
RECEIVED
Mt;' 0 2 LA
DCM-MHD CITY

Project:
Location:
Date:
Basin ID:
Drainage Area (A)
•
ENGINEERING
Curve Numbers
New Bern Riverfront Convention Center
New Bern, NC
17-Dec-19
0.04 Acres
Runoff Curve Numbers
Cover Description
Cover Type and Hydrologic Condition A Area ac B Area ac C Area ac D Area ac
Cultivated Land
Without Conservation Treatment
72
81
88
91
With Conservation Treatment
62
71
78
81
Wood of Forest Land
Poor Cover Thin
45
66
1
77
83
Good Cover
25
55
1
70
77
Open Spence lawns, parks, cemeteries, etc
Poor Condition
(grass cover <50%
68
79
86
89
Fair Condition
(grass cover 50%-75%
49
69
79
84
Good Condition
(grass cover>75%
39
0.023
61
74
80
Impervious Area
Prea arking Lots, Roofs, Drives, etc.
98
0.017
98
98
98
Soil Aper Hydrologic Group
1
0.04
1 1 0
0
1 0
Drainage Area = Area Total
Weighted Curve Number
CN = [(CNi*A,)+ (CNn`A,)]/Atot
TRUE 1 0.04 = 0.04
Pre Development Area 1 Curve Number 64.�8
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 cU[O
DCM-MHD CITY

Project:
Location:
Date:
Basin ID:
Drainage Area (A)
•
ENGINEERING
Curve Numbers
New Bern Riverfront Convention Center
New Bern, NC
17-Dec-19
0.1 1 Acres
Runoff Curve Numbers
Cover Description
Cover Type and Hydrologic Condition I A I Area ac B 1 Area (ac) I C I Area (ac) I D I Area ac
Cultivated Land
Without Conservation Treatment
1 72
1
81
1
1 88
1
1 91
With Conservation Treatment
1 62
1
71
1
1 78
1
1 81
Wood of Forest Land
Poor Cover Thin
45
1
66
1
1 77
1
1 83
Good Cover
1 25
1
55
1
1 70
1
1 77
Open S ance lawns, parks, cemeteries, etc
Poor Condition
(grass cover <50%
68
79
86
89
Fair Condition
(grass cover 50%-75%
49
69
79
84
Good Condition
(grass cover >75%
39
0.0433
61
74
80
Impervious Area
Parking Lots, Roofs, Drives, etc.
1 98
1 0.0567
1 98
1
1 98
198
Soil Area per Hydrologic Group
0.1
1
1 0
1 1
0 1
1
0
Drainage Area = Area Total
Weighted Curve Number
CN = [(CNi`Ai)+ (CNn*An)]/Atot
TRUE 1 0.1
Pre Development Area 2 Curve Number 72.45
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 NZO
DCM-MHD CITY

Project:
Location:
Date:
Basin ID:
Drainage Area (A)
Curve Numbers
New Bern Riverfront Convention Center
New Bern, NC
17-Dec-19
Infiltration Basin 1
4110
EN4GINEERINC.
0.04 Acres
Runoff Curve Numbers
Cover Description
Cover Type and Hydrologic Condition I A I Area (ac)I B I Area (ac)I C I Area (ac) I D I Area ac
Cultivated Land
Without Conservation Treatment
172
81
1
1 88
1
1 91
With Conservation Treatment
1 62
1
1 71
1
1 78
1
1 81
Wood of Forest Land
Poor Cover Thin
45
1
1 66
77
83
Good Cover
1 25
1
1 55
70
77
Open Spence lawns, parks, cemeteries, etc
Poor Condition
(grass cover <50%
68
79
86
89
Fair Condition
(grass cover 50%-75%
49
69
79
84
Good Condition
(grass cover >75%
39
0.023
61
74
80
Im ervious Area
Parking Lots, Roofs, Drives, etc.
1 98
1 0.017
1 98
98
1
1 98
Soil Area per Hydrologic Group
1
1 0.04
1
1 0
1
1 0
1 0
Drainage Area = Area Total
Weighted Curve Number
CN = [(CN,`A,)+ (CNn*An)1/Arot
TRUE 1 0.04 = 0.04
Post Development Area 2 to Sand Filter 64.08
Curve Number
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHL) CITY'

Project:
Location:
Date:
Basin ID:
Drainage Area (A)
Curve Numbers
New Bern Riverfront Convention Center
New Bern, NC
17-Dec-19
Basin 2
•
ENGINEERING
0.1 Acres
Runoff Curve Numbers
Cover Description
Cover Type and Hydrologic Condition I A I Area ac B I Area (ac) I C I Area (ac) I D I Area ac
Cultivated Land
Without Conservation Treatment
1 72
1
1 81
1
1 88
1
91
With Conservation Treatment
1 62
1
1 71
1
1 78
1
81
Wood of Forest Land
Poor Cover Thin
45
1
1 66
77
1
83
Good Cover
1 25
1
1 55
70
1
77
Open S ance lawns, parks, cemeteries, etc
Poor Condition
(grass cover <50%
68
79
86
89
Fair Condition
(grass cover 50%-75%
49
69
79
84
Good Condition
(grass cover >75%
39
0.023
61
74
80
Im ervious Area
Parking Lots, Roofs, Drives, etc.
1 98
1 0.017
1 98
1 1
98 1
1 98 mml
Soil Area per Hydrologic Group
1
1 0.04
1 1
0 1
1 0
1 0
Drainage Area = Area Total
Weighted Curve Number
CN = llCN.«Ai)+ (CNo*An)1/Atot
FALSE 1 0.1 = 0.04
Post Development Area 2 to Dry 64.�$
Detention Curve Number
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

CALCULATIONS
Stormwater Routing
RECEIVED
011 IP' 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

L
Watershed Model Schematic
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intellsolve v9.22
1 - Pre Development Area 1 2 - Post Into Infil 1 3 - Pre Development Area 2
5 - Post Infil 1 Umd
Y 7 -Total Pre
Y 8 - Total Post
4 - Post Into Infil 2
•—�.=r VED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY
Project: Infiltration Basin 1-yr24-hr.gpw
Thursday, Jan 30, 2020

2
Hydrograph Return Period Recap Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve v9.22
Hyd.
Hydrograph
Inflow
Peak Outflow (cfs)
Hydrograph
No.
type
Hyd(s)
description
(origin)
1-Yr
2-Yr
3-Yr
5-Yr
10-Yr
25-Yr
50-Yr
100-Yr
1
SCS Runoff
0.049
Pre DevelopmentArea 1
2
SCS Runoff
0.207
Post Into Infil 1
3
SCS Runoff
0.214
--
Pre Development Area 2
4
SCS Runoff
0.483
Post Into Infil 2
5
Reservoir
2
0.019
Post Infil 1
6
Reservoir
4
0.000
Post Infil 2
7
Combine
1, 3,
0.263
Total Pre
8
Combine
5, 6,
0.019
Total Post
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITE'
Pro j. file: Infiltration Basin 1-yr 24-hr.gpw
Thursday, Jan 30, 2020

3
Hydrograph Summary Report HydraflowHydrographsbylntelisolvev9.22
Hyd.
No.
Hydrograph
type
(origin)
Peak
flow
(cfs)
Time
interval
(min)
Time to
peak
(min)
Hyd.
volume
(cuft)
Inflow
hyd(s)
Maximum
elevation
(ft)
Total
strge used
(cuft)
Hydrograph
description
1
SCS Runoff
0.049
1
718
108
—
Pre Development Area 1
2
SCS Runoff
0.207
1
717
492
—
--
--
Post Into Infil 1
3
SCS Runoff
0.214
1
718
433
--
---
--
Pre Development Area 2
4
SCS Runoff
0.483
1
717
1,061
—
--
Post Into Infil 2
5
Reservoir
0.019
1
736
17
2
5.43
208
Post Infil 1
6
Reservoir
0.000
1
635
0
4
3.82
554
Post Infil 2
7
Combine
0.263
1
718
541
1, 3,
Total Pre
8
Combine
0.019
1
736
17
5, 6,
Total Post
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY
Infiltration Basin 1-yr 24-hcgpw
Return Period: 1 Year
Thursday, Jan 30, 2020

Hydrograph Report
4
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.22
Hyd. No. 1
Pre Development Area
1
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Storm frequency
= 1 yrs
Time interval
= 1 min
Drainage area
= 0.040 ac
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Tc method
= USER
Total precip.
= 3.52 in
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Q (cfs)
0.10
0.09
0.08
0.07
N M
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
000
Thursday, Jan 30, 2020
Peak discharge = 0.049 cfs
Time to peak
= 718 min
Hyd. volume
= 108 cuft
Curve number
= 64.1
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 5.00 min
Distribution
= Type II
Shape factor
= 484
Pre Development Area 1
Hyd. No. 1 -- 1 Year
Q (cfs)
0.10
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560
Time (min)
— Hyd No.1 RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCWMHO CITY

E
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.22
Thursday, Jan 30, 2020
Hyd. No. 2
Post Into Infil 1
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 0.207 cfs
Storm frequency
= 1 yrs
Time to peak
= 717 min
Time interval
= 1 min
Hyd. volume
= 492 cuft
Drainage area
= 0.040 ac
Curve number
= 98
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= Oft
Tc method
= USER
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 5.00 min
Total precip.
= 3.52 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Post Into Infil 1
Q (ofs) Hyd. No. 2 -- 1 Year Q (cfs)
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.40
0.40
0.35
0.35
0.30
0.30
0.25
0.25
0.20
0.20
0.15
0.15
0.10
0.10
0.05
0.05
n on
0.00
0 120
— Hyd No. 2
240 360 480 600 720
840 960 1080 1200
RECEIVED Time (min)
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHU CITY

0
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.22
Thursday, Jan 30, 2020
Hyd. No. 3
Pre Development Area 2
Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 0.214 cfs
Storm frequency = 1 yrs
Time to peak
= 718 min
Time interval = 1 min
Hyd. volume
= 433 cuft
Drainage area = 0.100 ac
Curve number
= 72.4
Basin Slope = 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method = USER
Time of cone. (Tc)
= 5.00 min
Total precip. = 3.52 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration = 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Q (cfs)
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
Pre Development Area 2
Hyd. No. 3 — 1 Year
Q (cfs)
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00 1 1 1 1 1 1 J I 1 0.00
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560
RECEIVED Time (min)
— Hyd No. 3
MAR 0 2l�'>')
®CM-MHD CITY

VI
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.22
Thursday, Jan 30, 2020
Hyd. No. 4
Post Into Infil 2
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 0.483 cfs
Storm frequency
= 1 yrs
Time to peak
= 717 min
Time interval
= 1 min
Hyd. volume
= 1,061 cuft
Drainage area
= 0.100 ac
Curve number
= 93.8
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= USER
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 5.00 min
Total precip.
= 3.52 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Post Into Infil 2
Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 4 — 1 Year Q (Cfs)
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.40
0.40
0.35
0.35
0.30
0.30
0.25
0.25
0.20
0.20
0.15
0.15
0.10
0.10
0.05
0.05
o o0
0.00
0 120
— Hyd No. 4
240 360 480 600 72U
likEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHU CITY
0
1200
Time (min)

8
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.22
Thursday, Jan 30, 2020
Hyd. No. 5
Post Infil 1
Hydrograph type
= Reservoir
Peak discharge
= 0.019 cfs
Storm frequency
= 1 yrs
Time to peak
= 736 min
Time interval
= 1 min
Hyd. volume
= 17 cult
Inflow hyd. No.
= 2 - Post Into Infil 1
Max. Elevation
= 5.43 ft
Reservoir name
= Infiltration Basin 1
Max. Storage
= 208 cult
Storage Indication method used. EAltration extracted from Outflow.
Q (cfs)
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
000
Post Infil 1
Hyd. No. 5 -- 1 Year
Q (cfs)
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 540 600 660 720 780 840
Time (min)
— Hyd No. 5 — Hyd No. 2 FpMe used = 208 cuft
MAR 0 2 2020
[I' r"# -�Jyn f`ITY

Pond Report s
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.22
Thursday, Jan 30, 2020
Pond No. 1 - Infiltration Basin 1
Pond Data
Contours - User -defined contour areas. Conic
method used for volume calculation. Begining Elevation = 3.74 ft.
Voids = 40.00%
Stage / Storage Table
Stage (ft) Elevation (ft) Contour area (sqft)
Incr. Storage (cult)
Total storage (cuft)
0.00 3.74
308
0
0
0.01 3.75
308
1
1
2.41 6.15
308
296
297
Culvert / Orifice Structures
Weir Structures
[A] [B]
[C]
[PrfRsr]
[A] [B]
[C]
[D]
Rise (in) = 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Crest Len (ft)
= 50.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Span (in) = 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Crest El. (ft)
= 5.50 0.00
0.00
0.00
No. Barrels = 0 0
0
0
Weir Coeff.
= 2.60 3.33
3.33
3.33
Invert El. (ft) = 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Weir Type
= Broad --
---
--
Length (ft) = 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Multistage
= No No
No
No
Slope (%) = 0.00 0.00
0.00
n/a
N-Value = .013 .013
.013
n/a
Orifice Coeff. = 0.60 0.60
0.60
0.60
Exfil.(INhr)
= 1.100 (by Contour)
Multistage = n/a No
No
No
TW Elev. (ft)
= 0.00
Stage (ft)
3.00
2.00
1.00
Note: Culvert/Orifice outno are analyzed ufMer inlet (ic) and outlet (a) conbul. Weir riser, chat*acl for office canditims (ic) and euMnergence (a).
Stage / Discharge
0.00
0.00 7.00 14.00 21.00 28.00 35.00 42.00 49.00
Total Q
Elev (ft)
6.74
5.74
4.74
56.00 63.o(RECEole196
Discharge (cfs)
MAR 0 2 2OZ-
01CM-MHO V "

10
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.22
Thursday, Jan 30, 2020
Hyd. No. 6
Post Infil 2
Hydrograph type
= Reservoir
Peak discharge
= 0.000 cfs
Storm frequency
= 1 yrs
Time to peak
= 635 min
Time interval
= 1 min
Hyd. volume
= 0 cuft
Inflow hyd. No.
= 4 - Post Into Infil 2
Max. Elevation
= 3.82 ft
Reservoir name
= Infiltration Basin 2
Max. Storage
= 554 cuft
Storage Indication method used. EAltration extracted from Outflow.
Post Infil 2
Q (Cfs) Hyd. No. 6 -- 1 Year Q (cfs)
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.40
0.40
0.35
0.35
0.30
0.30
0.25
0.25
0.20
0.20
0.15
0.15
0.10
0.10
0.05
0.05
0.00 0.00
0 180 360 540 720 900 1080 1260 1440 1620 1800
RECEI I (min)
— Hyd No. 6 — Hyd No 4 Ill Total storage used = 554 cult
MAR 0$ 20L,
DCM-MNO C'"

Pond Report 11
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.22
Thursday, Jan 30. 2020
Pond No. 2 - Infiltration Basin 2
Pond Data
Contours - User -defined contour areas. Average end area method used for volume calculation. Begining Elevation = 1.49 ft. Voids = 40.00%
Stage / Storage Table
Stage (ft) Elevation (ft) Contour area (sqft)
Incr. Storage (cuft)
Total storage (cult)
0.00 1.49
346
0
0
0.10 1.59
600
19
19
3.51 5.00
600
818
837
Culvert/ Orifice Structures
Weir Structures
[A] [B]
[C]
[PrfRsr]
[A] [B]
[C]
[D]
Rise (in) = 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Crest Len (ft)
= 50.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Span (in) = 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Crest El. (ft)
= 4.80 0.00
0.00
0.00
No. Barrels = 0 0
0
0
Weir Coeff.
= 2.60 3.33
3.33
3.33
Invert El. (ft) = 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Weir Type
= Broad --
--
---
Length (ft) = 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Multistage
= No No
No
No
Slope (%) = 0.00 0.00
0.00
n/a
N-Value = .013 .013
.013
n/a
Orifice Coeff. = 0.60 0.60
0.60
0.60
Exfil.(in/hr)
= 1.100 (by Contour)
Multi -Stage = n/a No
No
No
TW Elev. (ft)
= 0.00
Stage (ft)
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
NoteCulveNCrifim outilms are analyzee under inlet (ic) and outlet (oc) canool. Weir nears checked for orifice conditions (ic) and submergence (s).
Stage / Discharge
nn n nn z nn a nn S nn R 00 7.00 8.00
Total Q
1.00 12.(
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY
Elev (ft)
5.49
4.49
3.49
2.49
1.49
0
Discharge (cfs)

12
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.22
Thursday, Jan 30, 2020
Hyd. No. 7
Total Pre
Hydrograph type
= Combine
Peak discharge
= 0.263 cfs
Storm frequency
= 1 yrs
Time to peak
= 718 min
Time interval
= 1 min
Hyd. volume
= 541 cuft
Inflow hyds.
= 1, 3
Contrib. drain. area= 0.140 ac
Q (cfs)
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
Total Pre
Hyd. No. 7 -- 1 Year
Q (cfs)
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00 0.00
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560
RECEIVED Time (min)
Hyd No. 7 � Hyd No. 1 � Hyd No. 3
MAR 0 2
DCM-'MHD CITY

Hydrograph Report
13
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.22
Hyd. No. 8
Total Post
Hydrograph type = Combine
Storm frequency = 1 yrs
Time interval = 1 min
Inflow hyds. = 5, 6
Q (cfs)
0.10
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
000
Thursday, Jan 30, 2020
Peak discharge = 0.019 cfs
Time to peak = 736 min
Hyd. volume = 17 cuft
Contrib. drain. area= 0.000 ac
Total Post
Hyd. No. 8 — 1 Year
Q (cfs)
0.10
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00
0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 540 600 660 840
Time (min)
— Hyd No. 8 —Hyd No. 5 —Hyd No. 6
MAR 0 2 2020
OCM.MHD CITY

Mao
eoii Na. va uaws ws"`iomimx ssr3 uv
eJNI?J33NI�JN3
a3 N 0, _ 0
O
�LeY
.ex.r.�et
E1K1 3
ltl3$
„nw „xa
'• �/
�R/ �ni3a
1
L96S
�yvon�ay
'W lYliY
OW-0 Z
CamCD
-11= 3
z X
O CD
n
m O
�h
co n
O
CD
O
t
CD
CD
CD
L
O
7
W
Y
lama
YMV
e2��� yoeo0 OJ�
I
Tim Nsm
N3N0 Wd3O Ni .1
xMa a3NN a3O1M
el ION
om
Boa a3nia
'S3 `d3 ILL.. Xs.1NDVIYIY
ANY , SI 0J5
Lvw os rnssN �asaoL HLN
0- wg)
—iosers
63Latld.Oo ONI a3i1I3NOYa
WM3 QilOaddtl do
aareLaraxas.�N mod.=3
Ivlsu
R
alaO a3+o COS
55r1Dv0I1Na3B MLLVtl63ID
3Y R
3 3S U ION
fi
a0S (133NOAN0a
r, ti•<
w 3mI•
�pssM
N.0 ras),
9N6 d 5531
do = 'M 3N
aN/53MHI OL i] 3lYa MLLYaIINM
a3NSVM 30 A
Ard,sl, RQ SAYO K lY 313a0Na'J
31eI3U sd coo., S ft .s
..'•.
31r08of ION
3a0N00
L3 31GUY183d
A1n0 1HDn
(" mnv)
3OSals
ww .r
srra ee e
"!NW ad oaov
31VO5 OL ION
IN3N3AVd WIN
ALna 1H0n
caLLYdY9I,Y.3E)
SUN
OWH SNSM
and
9W ONILSIII3
I
NUS
Ous a3x3s xm
I
a3Ntl l
ONUS
N3Mad N15.3
I
NN*0
KSDIS ONUSn
OLLdO
a3eu aNddo
lN"NI aNllS.i
1
M18L O msm
WO ONU1W
tl310d ONIISe3i
aM3O31
1
1
i
1
I
�
N"M Ni ,
XWe H3'"p 3JNV1
afl� ��
•• =..
\
N9Y11
m do,
¢3sodoad
3Nt 30 3asLM
9
311 3lWJOl3tl -
fi
pS6=
fi fi
fi
OLLYd 3J 3`Q3lz
fifi
ourd 'xsra NouvaLwN fix`
dW
L
rooa aanm
w
DN/1 3J 35 BJ[ �
WS Ye1Na3�'
fi HOLLYNd3ii'J NLN�
�[
JOS O3Jl1O3NUd
000-
i s
fi
OUvd dJ =3
ourd
Sdj•d agog
I
L•^�I L i
fi I
1
v
1
\
\
1
r j 4
y jY
rr
Ir-
313HON00 2130Nn N011dl-ldlSNI
I
o] 3w 30
u }do
3 OL v
) « ,Nai
U3 U LW
SNOISN3W10 OVIS 313HONOO -lb'WS

Iovi
Loh

RRR
FRF ! 2
Pu ��
■
I
'
RRR
I
,
,
1
fTl I
N I
u
I
\
�
�
mm
1 ..x �
I _
+s• xsAt
�
flu
GRAVEL
I
.
I
o0
n RRR
i +e•ACA
/
•
Rp
o
I -:
mw
Y
R#
; Ru m0 � �J
aax .sl L st m Ln�G z �•�,
00 m cp
FFF I ~
: s i\ ` ♦ ZO 00
do C n 0 �yYJ(�,) RRyF tQ•'tq,E
�� ZO W =244
\fig 1 f
�\ I so• i `_peg`` _ _ _ 0T
� — _._
M Egg
so• aw
_ um to
` V)
H m s
fl
� s
s a
11,14
\ ^
$= Wit iwi
g ty NC GRID — NAD 83/2001
rill
Hil
D
New Bern Riverfront Convention Center Renovations -
PHASE 11
msslwnar. e...xonua.
03
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
AKLEY
wI
OLLER
nil Ilrri.•
I W Caxlxwae °wd e,tlJ• MexA.lC DPoI M iR992f
iin x�.M.ow xe.,re v,wnn xrnmin aiaxa�n

gem Mr-1
APPLICATION for \ /
Major Development Permit �/ 0
(last revised 12127JO6)
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1. Primary Applicant Landowner Information
Business Name
Craven County
Project Name (if applicable)
New Bern Riverfront Convention Center Renovation -Phase 2
Applicant 1: First Name
Jack
MI
Last Name
Veit, III
Applicant 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
If additional applicants, please attach an additional page(s) with names listed.
Mailing Address
406 Craven Street
PO Box
City
New Bern
State
NC
ZIP
28560 4971
Country
Craven
Phone No.
252 - 636 - 6600 ext.
FAX No.
Street Address (If different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
jvei t@crave nco u ntync. gov
2. AgentContractor Information
Business Name
Stocks Engineering, Pa
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Kevin
Varnell
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Mailing Address
PO BOX
City
State
1108
Nashville
NC
ZIP
Phone No. 1
Phone No. 2
27866
252 - 459 - 8196 ext.
ext.
FAX No.
Contractor #
252 459 8197
Street Address (if different from above)
City
state
ZIP
801 East Washington Street
Nashville
NC
27856 -
Email
[e-mail]
<Form continues on back>
DZ07 z © e, ]A
252.808-2808 .. 7.888-4RCOAST .. www.necoastalmanageinentCI@i`I3038

Form'DCM MP-1 (Page 2 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
3. Project Location
County (can be multiple)
Street Address
State Rd. #
Craven
203 South Front Street
Subdivision Name
city
State
Zip
New Bern
NC
28560 - 4971
Phone No.
Lot No.(s) (if many, attach additional page with list)
252 - 636 - 6600 ext.
I I ,
a. In which NC river basin is the project located?
b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
Neuse
Trent River
c. Is the water body Identified In (b) above, natural or manmade?
d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
®Natural ❑Manmade []Unknown
Trent River
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
f. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
®Yes ❑No
work falls within.
City of New Bern
4. Site Description
a. Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.)
b. Size of entire tract (sci tt.)
0
3.36
c. Size of individual lot(s)
d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
NWL (normal water level)
(If many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list)
4' ❑NHW or SNWL
e. Vegetation on tract
Grassed Lawn with Landscaping Including trees and bushes
f. Man-made features and uses now on tract
New Bern Convention Center and City of New Bern Waterfront Boardwalk
g. Identity and describe the existing land uses adlacan to the proposed project site.
The site only has one bordering property that is developed and that is curently a hotel.
h. How does local government zone the tract?
I. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
C-2
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
®Yes ❑No DNA
J. Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? ®Yes ❑No
k. Hasa professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. ❑Yes SNo ❑NA
If yes, by whom?
I. Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does It Involve a []Yes SNo ❑NA
National Register listed or eligible property?
<Form continues on next page>
RECEIVED
MA!' 01 OU20
252.808.2008 :. 1.080-4RCOAS'i .: v✓ww.nccoastalmanagement.net

Form OCM MP-1 (Page 3 of 4) / APPLICATION for
V�
P Major Development Permit
m. (i) Are there wetlands on the site?
(II) Are there coastal wetlands on the site?
Oyes ®No
[]Yes ®No
(III) If yes to either (1) or (it) above, has a delineation been conducted? ❑Yes ®No
(Attach documentation, If available)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
No additional sewer is needed for the proposed patio additon. Existing sewer served by City of New Bern.
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
No additional water is needed for the proposed patio additon. Existing water served by City of New Bern
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems.
A small portion of the existing site is being treated through an Infiltration basin.
& Activities and Impacts
a. Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use?
[]Commercial ®PubIIclGovernment
❑Private/Community
b. Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
The purpose of this project is to reconfigure the existing patio to a better use and fit
for specific programs.
.c. Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it Is to be stored.
Small size construction equipment will be used. le. Bobcat, Mini -Excavator, etc.
d. List all development activities you propose.
Minor Grading, Forming and Pouring Concrete, Pervious Pavers, and Landscaping.
e. Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both?
New Work
f. What Is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project?
0.53 ❑Sq.Ft or ®Acres
g. Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area
®Yea ❑No ❑NA
that the public has established use of?
h. Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
There are no proposed discharges to waters of the state.
I. Will wastewater or stonnwater be discharged into a wetland?
[]Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water?
❑Yes ❑No ®NA
j. Is there any mitigation proposed?
❑Yea ®No ❑NA
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal.
<Form continues on back>
DECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
252-808.2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastalmarrayen96WIlil l-ID CITY

Form tDCM MP-1 (Page 4 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
6. Additional Information
In addition to this completed application form, (MP-1) the following Items below, if applicable, must be submitted in order for the application
package to be complete. Items (a) — (f) are always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
Instruction booklet on how to properly prepare the required Items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (Including plan view and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, dearly Indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that Is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other Instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
f. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mall. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name RPG Hospitality, LLC Phone No. 252.638.3586
Address 100 Middle Street, New Bern, NC 28560
Name City of New Bern Phone No. 252.639.2700
Address PO Box 1129, New Bern, NC 28563
Name Phone No.
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal permits Issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, pernittee, and issuing dates.
Unknown
It. Signed consultant or agent authorization forth, if applicable.
I. Welland delineation, If necessary.
J. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and Inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1.10), if necessary. If the project Involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
1 7. Certi fcation and Permission to Enter on Land I
I understand that any permit Issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating Information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Date 02104 %idea-o Print Name TO, Ck a- V1 } �
r Signature
Please Indicate application attachments pertaining to yo roposed project.
❑DCM MP-2 Excavation and FIII Information
®DCM MP-3 Upland Development
❑DCM MP4 Structures Information
❑DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY
252.808.2008 :: 1-880-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastalmanagetnent.net

DOM MP-1
0(P
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
(last revised 12127106)
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1. Primary Applicant/ Landowner Information
Business Name
Craven County
Project Name (if applicable)
New Bem Riverfront Convention Center Renovation -Phase 2
Applicant 1: Fist Name
Jack
MI
Last Name
Veit, III
Applicant 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
If additional applicants, please attach an additional page(s) with names listed.
Mailing Address
406 Craven Street
PO Box
City
New Bern
State
NC
ZIP
28560 4971
Country
Craven
Phone No.
252 - 636 - 6600 ext.
FAX No.
Street Address (N different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
[e-mail]
2. Agent(Contractor Information
Business Name
Stocks Engineering, Pa
Agentl Contractor 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Kevin
Vamell
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name
MI
last Name
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
1108
Nashville
NC
ZIP
Phone No. 1
Phone No. 2
27856
252 - 459 - 8196 ext.
ext.
FAX No.
Contractor #
252 459 8197
Street Address (d dif/erant from above)
City
State
ZIP
801 East Washington Street
Nashville
NC
27856 -
Email
[e-mail]
RECEIVED
<Form continues on back>
MAR 0 S 2020
nrWeAun CITY
252.800.2808 :: 1.868-4111COA1SS .: www. no coast a Imanagetnent.net

Fofm DCM MP-1 (Page 2 of 4) APPLICATION for
;c t / O (t� Major Development Permit
3. Project Location
County (can be multiple)
Street Address
State Rd. #
Craven
203 South Front Street
Subdivision Name
City
State
Zip
New Bern
NC
28560- 4971
Phone No.
Lot No.(s) (Bmany, attach additional page with list)
252 - 636 - 6600 ext.
.
a. In which NC river basin is the project located?
b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
Neuse
Trent River
c. Is the water body Identified in (b) above, natural or manmade?
d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
®Natural []Manmade ❑Unknown
Trent River
a. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdictton7
f. If applicable, Ilst the planning judsdiction or city limit the proposed
®Yes []No
work falls wn.
City of New Bern
4.
Site Description
a. Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.)
b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.)
0
3.36
c.
Size of Individual lot(s)
d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
NAIL (normal water level)
(if many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list)
4' ❑NHW or ONWL
e.
Vegetation on tract
Grassed Lawn with Landscaping Including trees and bushes
f.
Man-made features and uses now on tract
New Bern Convention Center and City of New Bern Waterfront Boardwalk
g.
Identity and describe the existing land uses adiacant to the proposed project site.
The site only has one bordering property that is developed and that is curently a hotel.
h.
How does local government zone the tract?
I. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
C-2
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, If applicable)
®Yes []No ❑NA
J.
Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? ®Yes ❑No
k.
Hasa professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. []Yes ®No DNA
If yes, by whom?
I.
Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it Involve a []Yes ®No ❑NA
National Register listed or eligible property?
<Form continues on next page> RECEIVEt ,
2020
252.808.2808 :: ?-888.4RCOAST :: www.nccoastatmanagemen MI-IDCITY

Fotfi DCM MP-1 (Page 3 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
m. (1) Are there wetlands on the site? []Yes ®No
(II) Are there coastal wetlands on the site? []Yes ®No
(III) If yes to either (i) or (11) above, has a delineation been conducted? ❑Yes ®No
(Attach documentation, Havailable)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
No additional sewer is needed for the proposed patio additon. Existing sewer served by City of New Bern.
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
No additional water is needed for the proposed patio additon. Existing water served by City of New Bern
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems.
A small portion of the existing site is being treated through an infiltration basin.
& Activities and Impacts
a. WIII the project be for commercial, public, or private use?
[]Commercial ®Publlc/Govemment
❑Private/Community
b. Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
The purpose of this project is to reconfigure the existing patio to a better use and fit
for specific programs.
.c. Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
Small size construction equipment will be used. Is. Bobcat, Mini -Excavator, etc.
d. List all development activities you propose.
Minor Grading, Forming and Pouring Concrete, Pervious Pavers, and Landscaping.
e. Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both?
New Work
f. What Is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project?
0.53 ❑Sq.Ft or ®Acres
g. WIII the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area
®Yea [:]No ❑NA
that the public has established use of?
h. Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
There are no proposed discharges to waters of the state.
I. WIII wastewater or stonnwater be discharged Into a wetland?
[]Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water?
❑Yes ❑No ®NA
J. Is there any mitigation proposed?
[]Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal.
<Form continues on back>
RECEIVED
uno 0%?non
252.808.2806 .. 9.880-¢GdtaOASy .. www.nccoasEalvnanageme"t.net
DCM-MHD CITY

Foim DCM MP-1 (Page 4 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
6. Additional Information
In addition to this completed application form, (MP-1) the following hems below, If applicable, must be submitted In order for the application
package to be complete. Items (a) — (f) are always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
Instruction booklet on how to properly prepare the required Items below.
a.
A project narrative.
b.
An accurate, dated work plat (Including plan view and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly Indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distingulsh
between work completed and proposed.
c.
A site or location map that Is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
d.
A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other Instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e.
The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
I.
A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mall. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name RPG Hospitality, LLC Phone No. 252.638.3586
Address 100 Middle Street, New Sam, NC 285W
Name City of New Bern Phone No. 252.639.2700
Address PO Box 1129, New Bern, NC 28563
Name Phone No.
Address
g.
A list of previous state or federal permits Issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
Unknown
h.
Signed consultant or agent authorization form, If applicable.
1.
Welland delineation, if necessary.
j.
A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k.
A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1.10), if necessary. If the project Involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
17. Certification and Permission to Enter on Land
I understand that any permit Issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating Information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certl that he information provided in this application Is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Date 02 o4) OLoXo Print Name k f3.1/*-'} T
Signature
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to yotwiroposed project. RECEIVED
❑DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information ❑DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
®DCM MP-3 Upland Development MAR 0 2 2020
❑DCM MP-4 Structures Information
DCM-MHD CITY
252-808.2806 :: 1.888.4RCOAST :: www.nccoastalmaaagemeat.net

New Bern Riverfront
Convention Center
Owner/Developer:
Craven County
406 Craven Street
New Bern, NC 28560
ENGINEERING
801 E. Washington Street
PO Box1108
Nashville, NC 27856
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
,,`,,,IIBIe IPI�•••••
��.� PAN CARO< ••..
SEAL 29r
3843
INE�.° �•E.. oo`
L
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

R M F., h 1 W6
ENGINEERING
naiq,iwo the Future, today
TABLE OF CONTENTS
NARRATIVE
Site Location
Project Description
Stormwater Management
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
USGS Map
NRCS Soils Report
FEMA Floodplain Map
Geotechs Soils Report
NOAA Precipitation Data
CALCULATIONS
Infiltration Basin Design Worksheet
Curve Number Calculations
Stormwater Routing

Site Location
203 S. Front St. New Bern, NC 28560.
From US HWY 70 East take E Front Street to the North across the Trent River. Turn left onto S. Front
Street and the destination is immediately on the Left.
Project Description
The existing New Bern Riverfront Convention Center is enlarging their outdoor patio space. Stocks
Engineering is contracted with the Oakley Collier Architects for the civil engineering aspects of the design
and permitting process. The proposed multi -level patio will increase the amount of impervious surface on
the site and two infiltration basins are proposed to treat the increased impervious area.
Stormwater Management Plan
The onsite soil consists of loamy sand to sand. The soil is Seabrook -Urban land complex (A Soils)
Soils information was obtained through the NRCS website:
htto7//websoilsurvev nres usda gov/aoo/ for Wake County.
The site currently drains directly into the Trent River which is a tributary to the Neuse River.
The proposed site improvements increase the onsite impervious area 2,274.28 SF. The site design
provides two small infiltration basins that will treat 5,838.38 SF of total drainage area, 5,553.9 SF of which
is impervious. The infiltration basins trap the 1.5 - INCH storm and allows the runoff to infiltrate the natural
ground at a rate of 1.1 IN/HR.
Post -development runoff is less than pre -development because of the addition of the infiltration basins.
The impervious area that will drain into the existing stormwater control measures was reduced by
3,279.62 SF.
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 Z020
DCM-MHD CITY

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
USGS Map
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 ?D20
DCM-MHD CITY

s
NEW BERN QUADRANGLE
NORTH CAROLINA
7.5-MINUTE SERIES
14
0
15 16
I- ir
IS ITE
sFRSN Union
Point
v
r Alfred A
.. Cunningham `
Bridge
9
-rr.D000'
17
35.1250'
Bridgeton
88
N.
N4 N4
N y14 y1F ..�YLI NW
YL
•.il(-
N16
ti1L -
87
I NII-
'DYROINT RD
NY
�7t�
NY
86
Nr NLL
NIL
�
Nu.
NIL
Nr� Nr
� NI4
.uL Nr
85
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020 N�
DCM-MHD CITY
yr
Green
Spring
GREE,y Point
os Fort
"a
6 o Point
A IL11 PAN
\ P.
P^
L SS
Lyi

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
NRCS Soils Report
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

8
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.22
Thursday, Jan 30, 2020
Hyd. No. 5
Post Infil 1
Hydrograph type
= Reservoir
Peak discharge
= 0.019 cfs
Storm frequency
= 1 yrs
Time to peak
= 736 min
Time interval
= 1 min
Hyd. volume
= 17 cuft
Inflow hyd. No.
= 2 - Post Into Infil 1
Max. Elevation
= 5.43 ft
Reservoir name
= Infiltration Basin 1
Max. Storage
= 208 cuft
Storage Indication method used. Exfiltration extracted from Outflow
Post Infil 1
Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 5 -- 1 Year
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
000
Q (cfs)
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 540 600 660 720 780 840
— Hyd No. 5 — Hyd No. 2 Total storage used = 208 cuft 13E8E*96
MAR 0 2 2020
!]CM-MHD CITY

Pond Report 9
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.22
Thursday, Jan 30, 2020
Pond No. 1 - Infiltration Basin 1
Pond Data
Contours - User -defined contour areas. Conic
method used for volume calculation. Begining Elevation = 3.74 ft.
Voids = 40.00%
Stage / Storage Table
Stage (ft) Elevation (ft) Contour area (sgft)
Incr. Storage (tuft)
Total storage (tuft)
0.00 3.74
308
0
0
0.01 3.75
308
1
1
2.41 6.15
308
296
297
Culvert Orifice Structures
Weir Structures
[A] [B]
[C]
[PrfRsr]
[A] [B]
[C]
[D]
Rise (in) = 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Crest Len (ft)
= 50.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Span (in) = 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Crest El. (ft)
= 5.50 0.00
0.00
0.00
No. Barrels = 0 0
0
0
Weir Coeff.
= 2.60 3.33
3.33
3.33
Invert El. (ft) = 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Weir Type
= Broad -
-
-
Length (ft) = 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Multi -Stage
= No No
No
No
Slope (%) = 0.00 0.00
0.00
Na
N-Value = .013 .013
.013
n/a
Orifice Coeff. = 0.60 0.60
0.60
0.60
Exfll.(inlhr)
= 1.100 (by Contour)
Multistage = n/a No
No
No
TW Elev. (ft)
= 0.00
Stage (ft)
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
0.00 7.00
Total 0
Note: CulverNOrfice outflows are analyzed under inlet (to) and outlet (m) control. Weir deers checked for oMce conditions (ic) and submergence (s)
Stage / Discharge
14.00 21.00 28.00 35.00 42.00 49.00
56.00 63.00
Elev (ft)
6.74
5.74
4.74
' 3.74
70.00
REQMvrffA
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

10
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.22
Thursday, Jan 30, 2020
Hyd. No. 6
Post Infil 2
Hydrograph type
= Reservoir
Peak discharge
= 0.000 cfs
Storm frequency
= 1 yrs
Time to peak
= 635 min
Time interval
= 1 min
Hyd. volume
= 0 cuft
Inflow hyd. No.
= 4 - Post Into Infil 2
Max. Elevation
= 3.82 ft
Reservoir name
= Infiltration Basin 2
Max. Storage
= 554 cuft
Storage Indication method used. ExIlItration extracted from Outflow
Q (cfs
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
n nn
Post Infil 2
Hyd. No. 6 -- 1 Year
I it I I I I I
0 180 360 540 720
Hyd No. 6 — Hyd No. 4
Q (cfs)
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
900 1080 1260 1440
Time (min)
Total storage used = 554 cuft RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

Pond Report
11
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.22
Thursday, Jan 30, 2020
Pond No. 2 - Infiltration Basin 2
Pond Data
Contours - User -defined contour areas. Average end area method used for volume calculation. Begining Elevation = 1.49 ft. Voids = 40.00%
Stage / Storage Table
Stage (ft) Elevation (ft) Contour area (sgft)
Incr. Storage (cult)
Total storage (tuft)
0.00 1.49
346
0
0
0.10 1.59
600
19
19
3.51 5.00
600
818
837
Culvert I Orifice Structures
Weir Structures
[A] [B]
[C]
[PrfRsr]
[A] [B]
[C]
[D]
Rise (in) = 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Crest Len (ft)
= 50.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Span (in) = 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Crest El. (ft)
= 4.80 0.00
0.00
0.00
No. Barrels = 0 0
0
0
Weir Coeff.
= 2.60 3.33
3.33
3.33
Invert El. (ft) = 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Weir Type
= Broad -
-
-
Length (ft) = 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Multistage
= No No
No
No
Slope (%) = 0.00 0.00
0.00
Na
N-Value = .013 .013
.013
n/a
Orifice Coeff. = 0.60 0.60
0.60
0.60
Exfll.(iNhr)
= 1.100 (by Contour)
Multistage = n1a No
No
No
TW Elev. (ft)
= 0.00
Stage (ft)
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
000
Note: CulveNOrifim outflows are analyzed under inlet (ic) and outlet (w) control. Weir needs rheclled for orifice conditions (ic) end submergence (s)
Stage / Discharge
Elev (ft)
5.49
4.49
3.49
2.49
1.49
0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 °tNED
Iso arge (cfs)
Total O
MAR 0 2 2M
t)CM_MHD CITY

12
Hydrograph Report
HydraFlow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.22
Thursday, Jan 30, 2020
Hyd. No. 7
Total Pre
Hydrograph type
= Combine
Peak discharge =
0.263 cfs
Storm frequency
= 1 yrs
Time to peak =
718 min
Time interval
= 1 min
Hyd. volume =
541 cuft
Inflow hyds.
= 1, 3
Contrib. drain. area=
0.140 ac
Q (cfs)
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
Total Pre
Hyd. No. 7 -- 1 Year
Q (cfs)
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00 0.00
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560
Time (min)
Hyd No. 7 — Hyd No. 1 — Hyd No 3 RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

Hydrograph Report
13
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.22
Hyd. No. 8
Total Post
Hydrograph type
= Combine
Storm frequency
= 1 yrs
Time interval
= 1 min
Inflow hyds.
= 5, 6
Q (cfs)
0.10
MIM
NM.
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
000
Thursday, Jan 30, 2020
Peak discharge = 0.019 cfs
Time to peak = 736 min
Hyd. volume = 17 cuft
Contrib. drain. area= 0.000 ac
Total Post
Hyd. No. 8 — 1 Year
Q (cfs)
0.10
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00
0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 540 600 660 720 780 840
— Hyd No. 8 —Hyd No. 5 —Hyd No. 6 RECE1AMIDIn)
MAR 0 2 2020
DOA- & D CITE'

S
Yi•
W
1 �
rA A
�• � � �:� �-:fix
f.
.trrr yrvw3�71' arY.- !.
'AO'.
Sc
StA
ruafo
Bra
�•1
are Ur
I Cna StA
CnB
qll
Se
SITE
Ra
Uf
Mu
r
v
y.�
BftM
.
Ln
`,. Ln
u
��
Ln
CA
s
Se
Ln
Mu
�
L•
Mu
li
HDA
Mu i

USDA United States
Department of
Agriculture
MRCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Craven
County,
North Carolina
t
HLCEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY
December 17, 2019

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nres/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (hftp://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soilstcontactusn
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a RECEIVED
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................
2
How Soil Surveys Are Made ..................................................................................
5
SoilMap ..................................................................................................................
0
Soil Map ................................................................................................................
0
Legend~,~,~.............................—..............1D
Map Unit Legend .................—..~..--.......—...~.--11
Map Unit Descriptions .......—...—.............................11
Craven County, North Carolina .......................................................................
13
Go--SeobnVok^Urbanland complex ............................................................
13
VV-�Watnc...—...........—..—.................,—..14
Soil Information for All Uses ...............................................................................
15
Soil Properties and Qualities ..............................................................................
15
Soil Qualities and Features .............................................................................
5
Hydrologic Soil Group (New Bern RimnrhontConvention Center) ...............
15
RECEIVED
MAR 2 2020
D��-������� -���-`'^-,~,,,

How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character RECEIVED
soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil -landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
[)CM-NIHG CITY

3 61T' N
M-C9'N
Custom Soil Resource Report
ti Soil Map 3
rn
N yN
F
314310 314270 314300 314330 314360
3
K
H Map5mle: 1:1,220ffpaltedon Apwtrat(8.5"xll")stx
N�
0 15 30 BJ 90
AFeet
,� 3,N
Map pgection: Web Mermty Ga olnd3wates: WC584 Edge dm U1M Zone 18N W(S84
9
39" (, 11 N
I
3P a'9'N
314390 314
3
>n
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

M
D
O
h9
N
O
N
O
i,
MAPLEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
O
Area of Interest (AOI)
Sails
Q
Soil Map Unit Polygons
�.y
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special
Point Features
V
Blowout
®
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
0
Closed Depression
x
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
O
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
r�.
Mine or Quarry
O
Miscellaneous Water
C
Perennial Water
,V
Rock Outcrop
+
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
4&
Severely Eroded Spot
0
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Custom Soil Resource Report
i§
Spoil Area
o
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
We Spot
Other
.�
Special Line Features
Water Features
N
Streams and Canals
Transportation
#44
Rails
Interstate Highways
�y
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
.
Aerial Photography
10
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Craven County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 22, Sep 16, 2019
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Mar 7, 2015—Oct 30,
2017
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shiRina of mao unit boundaries may be evident.

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name I Acres in AOI IPercent of A01
Sc Seabrook -Urban land complex 5.3 99.9%
W Water 0.0 0.1 %
Totals for Area of Interest 5.3 100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the RECEIVED
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
MAR 0 8 ZOZO
11 DCM-MHD CITY

Custom Soil Resource Report
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
12 DCM-MHD CITY

Custom Soil Resource Report
Craven County, North Carolina
Sc—Seabrook-Urban land complex
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol., 3wgs
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period. 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Seabrook and similar soils: 50 percent
Urban land: 35 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Seabrook
Setting
Landform: Depressions on stream terraces, depressions on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material. Sandy fluviomarine deposits and/or eolian sands
Typical profile
A - 0 to 8 inches: loamy sand
C - 8 to 81 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (5.95
to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 24 to 42 inches
Frequency of flooding: Rare
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 3.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonimigated): 3s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Urban Land
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonimigated): 8
Hydric soil rating: No RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
13 DCM-MHD CITY

Custom Soil Resource Report
Minor Components
Leon
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Hydric soil rating: Yes
W—Water
Map Unit Composition
Water. 100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transacts of the mapunit.
Description of Water
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8w
Hydric soil rating: No
14
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

Soil Information for All Uses
Soil Properties and Qualities
The Soil Properties and Qualities section includes various soil properties and
qualities displayed as thematic maps with a summary table for the soil map units in
the selected area of interest. A single value or rating for each map unit is generated
by aggregating the interpretive ratings of individual map unit components. This
aggregation process is defined for each property or quality.
Soil Qualities and Features
Soil qualities are behavior and performance attributes that are not directly
measured, but are inferred from observations of dynamic conditions and from soil
properties. Example soil qualities include natural drainage, and frost action. Soil
features are attributes that are not directly part of the soil. Example soil features
include slope and depth to restrictive layer. These features can greatly impact the
use and management of the soil.
Hydrologic Soil Group (New Bern Riverfront
Convention Center)
Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are
assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the
soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation
from long -duration storms.
The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and
three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows:
Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly
wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or
gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission.
Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These
consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained
soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils RECEIVED
have a moderate rate of water transmission.
MAR 0 2 2020
1s
DCM-MHD CITY

Custom Soil Resource Report
Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist
chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or
soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water
transmission.
Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when
thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell
potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at
or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material.
These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission.
If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or CID), the first letter is
for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their
natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes.
16
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

3 617N
M. 6TN
Custom Soil Resource Report
ti Map —Hydrologic Soil Group (New Bern Riverfront Convention Center)
a
(N QN
3V240 31 Ti 31M 31C ...
3
A
H Map Sole:1:1,220 Mpi'6ed on Apoiea&(8.5"x 11')shee[
N Mess
A 0 15 30 W 90
Feet
0 50 100 310 300
Map P<oJecbw: Web Maoax Car axrdn bes: WGS8d Edge Ba: UIM Zone 18N W(S801
17
3 617N
I
I
3 67N
314 314=
3
b
REPEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITE'

MAPLEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
E]
Area of Interest (AOI)
Solis
Soil Rating Polygons
.
A
®
AID
-
B
.
BID
®
C
.
C/o
®
D
Q
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating Lines
ry
A
N
AID
.y
B
�y
BID
N
C
N CID
Ww- D
r Not rated or not available
Soil Rating Points
A
A/D
B
B/D
1
Custom Soil Resource Report
■I
C
07
CID
01
D
13
Not rated or not available
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
�µ
Rails
N
Interstate Highways
Yy
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
- Aerial Photography
18
kyiIs\:A1.1 GI7IT, e11111111IO]gJ
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24.000.
Waming: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Craven County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 22, Sep 16, 2019
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Mar 7, 2015—Oct 30,
2017
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of mat) unit boundaries may be evident.

Custom Soil Resource Report
Table —Hydrologic Soil Group (New Bern Riverfront Convention
Center)
Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
Sc Seabrook -Urban land A 5.3 99.9%
_—_ complex
W Water 0.0 0.1%
Totals for Area of Interest _ 5.3 100.0%
Rating Options —Hydrologic Soil Group (New Bern Riverfront
Convention Center)
Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition
Component Percent Cutoff.- None Specified
Tie -break Rule: Higher
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
19 DCM-MHD CITY

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.govtwps/portal/
nres/detail/nabonal/soils/?cid=nres142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portaVnres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nresl42p2_O53577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portaVnres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nresl42p2_O63580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.govtwps/portal/nres/
detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
20
DCM-MHD CITY

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http:/Avww.nres.usda.govtwps/portal/
nres/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nres 142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nrGs.usda.govtwps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nres142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/lntemet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nresl42p2_052290.pdf
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
21 DCM-MHD CITY

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
FEMA Floodplain Map
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

i`
IV I MC Its
IF
�nrir�51
AF8892
M

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
Geotechs Soils Report
DECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

A ll
STEWART
STRONGER BY DESIGN
August 27, 2019
Craig Wilke
Craven County Finance Department
406 Craven Street
New Bern, NC 28560
Re: Craven County Convention Center
203 S. Front Street
New Bern, NC
In -situ Infiltration Testing
Dear Mr. Wilke,
Raleigh - Geotech/CMT Lab 5400 Old Poole Road
T 919.380.8750 Raleigh, NC 27610
GEOTECHNICAL ADDENDUM NO. 1
As requested, Stewart has completed infiltration testing for the above -referenced project. This letter describes
the testing performed and resulting data.
Infiltration testing was performed at two locations as shown on the attached plan.
Infiltration testing was performed using a Guelph Permeameter, which is a field-testing device that measures the
in -situ, steady-state rate of water recharge under a constant -head condition. The infiltration tests for both
locations were performed in a 6 cm diameter hand auger boring advanced to depth of 12 inches below the
current ground surface. Two tests were performed per location to allow averaging of the data. The average
infiltration rates for locations I-1 and I-2 were 5.5 in/hr and 1.1 in/hr, respectively. The soil encountered at the
test locations was fill material and visually -manually classified as Silty SAND (USCS Class: SM). The soil at I-2
appeared to have slightly more fines (silt/clay) than I-1.
Since the near surface soil in this area is relatively recent fill, likely placed during construction of the Convention
Center, the usual identifiers of the seasonal high water table (SHWT) were not present. However, the soil test
borings performed during our subsurface exploration in May 2019 indicate that the groundwater was at a depth
of 5 feet below the current ground surface in this portion of the site. The water table is expected to undergo tidal
fluctuation due to its proximity to the river and groundwater mounding likely occurs during periods of heavy rain
at high tide stage. This being the case, it is reasonable to estimate the SHWT in this portion of the site is at or
very near the current ground surface.
We trust that this letter is responsive to your needs at this time. If you have any questions, please feel free to
call me.
Respectfully,
STEWART
4k�- RECEIVED
Don Brown, P.E., LEED AP
Practice Leader, Geotechnical & Construction Services MAR 0 2 2020
attachment: Testing Location Plan DCM-MHD CITY
WWW.STEWARTINC.COM CHARLOTTE / DURHAM / RALEIGH / WILMINGTON / COLUMBIA, SC

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
NOAA Precipitation Data
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 2, Version 3 NEW BERN
FAA AIRPORT
Station ID: 31-6108
Location name: New Bern, North Carolina, USA"
Latitude: 35.0667°, Longitude:-77.050
Elevation:
Elevation (station metadata): 16 ft" 0,13qv,
`source: ESRI Maps
•` source: USGS
POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES
G.M. Bonnin, D. Marlin, B. Lin, T. Parzybok, M.Yekta, and D. Riley
NOAA, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, Maryland
PF tabular I PF graphical I Mgo2&aerials
PF tabular
PDS-based point precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (in inches)1
Duration
Average recurrence Interval (years)
1
2
5
70
���-���
25
50
100
200
500
1000
0.481
0.563
0.647
0.732
0.82E
0.904
0.979
1.06
1.15
5-min
1.23
0.442-0.525
0.519-0.614
0.595-0.704
0.672-0.796
0.753-0.897
0.822-0.982
0.885-1.06
0.946-1.15
1.02-1.25
1.09-1.35
Flo -min
(0.706-0839)
0.830-0981
0.953-1.13
1.07-127)
1.20-31243
1.31-�56
1AI--11669
1.50-61782
1.62--1.98
1.712.12
F09
7-17
15-min
0. 82--11.05
1.04 1323
1.21-31.43
1.364.61)
(1. 2-61781
1. 6-81298
1.78 2.14)
(1.8-2.29
2. 3 2949
(2. 5-2466
1.32
1.57
1.86
2.15
2.47
2.75
3.01
3.28
3.64
3.95
30-min
1.21-1.44
1.44-1.70
1.71-2.03
1.97-2.33
2.25-2.68
2.50-2.96
2.72-3.27
2.95-3.57
3.24-3.96
3.48-4.31
60-min
1 51--61479)
1.81 2614
2.20 2960
2.5E 3904)
3. 0 3957
338-4.04
3. 5-4.51
4.35A0
4.645?69
5. 8 6630
1.97
2.38
2.98
3.53
4.28
4.94
5.63
6.38
7.44
8.39
1.80-2.17
2.17-2.61
2.70-3.24
3.22-3.86
3.87-4.67
4.45-5.40)
5.05-6.15
5.67-6.96)
(6.55-8.13)1(7.32-9.19
2.13
2.57
3.21
3.8E
4.72
5.53
6.37
7.30
8.65
9.89
3-hr
1.93-2.37
2.34-2.85
2.92-3.8
3.49-4.27
4.25-5.21
4.94-6.08
5.66-7.01
6.42-8.03
7.52-9.53
8.50-10.9
6-hr
2. 2 2789
2.87 3.48
3.50-4.35
4.20523
5. 3 6441
5.98 7351
6.8 886E
7. 2 959E
9.1 - 1.8
10.4z 3.6
3.03
3.65
4.59
5.5E
6.88
8.12
9.45
10.9
13.1
15.2
12-hr
2.72-3.42
3.294.12
4.12-5.18
4.97-6.27
(6.10-7.73)
1 (7.15-9.10
8.24-10.6
9.44-12.2)
(11.2-14.7)1(12.7-17.0
3.52
4.27
5.53
6.59
8.1E
9.51
11.0
12.6
15.1
17.2
24-hr
3.20-3.90
3.89-4.75
5.02-6.12
5.95-7.28
7.32-9,01
8.46-10.5
9.71-12.1
11.0-14.0
(12.9-16.7)1(14.6-19.1
47
2-0ay
3. 8-4.6
4. 65452
5.761-7509
6.778$41
8.34 10.4
9.67- 2.1
11 1-14,1
12.1-16.3
15.I0-19.7
17?0- 2.7
4.33
5.25
6.71
7.94
9.77
11.3
13.1
15.0
17.9
20.4
3•day
(3.93.4.81)
4.76-5.82
6.07-7.44)
(7.16-8.79)
1 (8.7410.8
10.1-12.5
11.5-14.4
13.0-16.5
15.3-19.9
17.2-22.8
4-day
4.35 06
5. 6 6g12
6.43-07879
7.54 9317
9.14-121.2
10.5- 2.9
11 9314.7
13.3-16.7
15.6--20.0
17.5- 2.8
5.3E
6.47
8.13
9.50
11.5
13.1
14.9
16.8
19.5
21.9
7-day4.91-5.88
5.93-7.09
7.43-8.90
8.66-10.4
10.412.E
11.8-14.4
13.3-16.3
14.9-18.5
17.0-21.6
18.8-24.3
6.07
7.28
9.02
10.5
2.5
14.2
16.1
18.0
20.8
23.1
10day
5,57-6.64
6.68-7.95)
1 (8.27-9.85)
1 (9.6-11.4)
1 (11.4-13.7
12.9-15.5
14.4-17.6)
16.0-19.8
18.2-23.0
20.0-25.7
8.17
9.74
11.8
13.E
16.0
18.0
2-0 T-17
22.4
25.5
28.0
20-0ay
7.59-8.84
9.04-10.5
(11.0-12.8)
12.5-14.7
14.7-17.3
16.5-19.5
18.3-21.8
20.1-24.3
22.6-27.9
24.6-30.8
10.1
22.0
14.4
16.3
99.0
11.2
23.4
25-6
28.7
31.1
30-day
9.37-10.8
11.1-12.9
13.4-15.5
15.2-17.6
17.6-20.5
19.5-22.8
21.4-25.2
23.3-27.7
25.9-31.2
27.8-34.0
45day
11 13.5
13.I8-16.0
165-19.1
18270--21.7
21?6- 5.3
24 0- 8.2
265931.3
](28.9134.E
32 36 9.2
34 8.42.9
15.1
17.8
21.0
23.E
27.1
29.9
32.7
35.5
39.4
42.4
60-day
14.1-16.1
nL2jLJLLjL22.5
22.0-25.2)
25.2-29.0
2L 32.0)
30.1-35.1
32.E-38.3
35.8-42.6
38.2-46.0)
t Precipitation frequency (PF) estimates in this table are based on frequency analysis of partial duration series (PDS).
Numbers in parenthesis are PF estimates at lower and upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval. The probability that precipitation frequency
estimates (for a given duration and average recurrence Interval) will be greater than the upper bound (or less than the lower bound) Is 5%. Estimates at
upper bounds are not checked against probable maximum precipitation (PMP) estimates and may be higher than currently valid PMP values.
Please refer to NOAA Atlas 14 document for more information.
Back to Top
PF graphical
RECEI ED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

PDS-based depth -duration -frequency (DDF) curves
Latitude: 35.06670, Longitude:-77.05000
YJ
40
35
c
30
a
a 25
c
O
20
u
a
y 15
a
10
Sr ............:.
L f0 a rnr0 N 1p0 R N 10 �M
m N N
Duration
45
40
35
c
30
a
25
20
15
10
5
0
1 2 5 10 25 50 100 200 Soo lot
NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 2, Version 3
Average recurrence interval (years)
Created (GMT)l: Tue Dec 17 19:08:38 2019
Back to ToR
Maps & aerials
Small scale terrain
Average recurrence
interval
(years)
— 1
2
5
— 1D
25
50
100
— 200
— 500
— 1000
Duration
— 5-min
— 2-day
— 10-min
— 3-day
1"in
— 4-day
— 3D-mdn
— 7-day
— 6"In
— 10-day
— 2-1r
— 20-aay
— 3.tir
— 30-day
— 5-hr
— 46-day
— 12-hr
— 60-day
— 24-hr
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
[)CM-MH() CITY

IKelw
Fia Urn
L 2 i
Large scale terrain
ack:f momd
Large scale map
Rocky Mwnt
P
Grx,Allo
0
Jacksmville
0
Wilrnin&n
100knn
�--Xrni
Large scale aerial
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

Back to Top
US Department of Commerce
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Weather Service
National Water Center
1325 East West Highway
Silver Spring, MD 20910
Questions?: [e-mail]_
Disclaimer
DECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
oCM-MHD CITY

NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 2, Version 3
Location name: New Bern, North Carolina, USA*
Latitude: 35.1035% Longitude:-77.0371° p :
Elevation: 6.95 ft 1
'source: ESRI Maps
"source: USGS
POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES
G.M. Bonne, D. Martin, B. Lin, T. Parzybok, M.Yekta, and D. Riley
NOAA, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, Maryland
PF tabular i PF graphical i Maps & aerials
PF tabular
PDS-based point precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (in inches/hour)1
Average
recurrence interval (years)
Duration
10
25
50
100
200
500
1000
5.77
6.76
7.75
8.77
9.90
10.8
11.7
12.8
13.8
14.8
5-min
5.29-6.30
6.22-7.36
7.13-8.44
8,04-9.54
9.01-10.8
9.85-11.8
10.6-12.8
11.3-13.7
12.2A5.0
13.0-16.2
4.61
5.40
6.21
7.01
7.88
8.63
9.32
10.0
10.9
11.6
10-min
4.22-5.03
4.97-5.89
5.71-6.76
6A3-7.63
7.19-8.57
7.84-9.38
8.42-10.1
8.98.10.9
9.67-11.9
10.3-12.7
974
15-min
3. 2�19
4. 6-4.93
4.81---5..70
5. 2-6.44
6.07-�24
6. 2�692
7. 0 8654
.55 9.16
8. 2 9396
8. 8 10.6
2.63
3.13
3.72
4.29
4.94
5.49
8.02
8.58
7.27
7.89
30-min
2.41-2.87
2.883.41
3.42A.05
3.934.88
4.50-5.36
4.98-5.98
5.43-6.54
5.88-7.13
6.46-7.92
6.95-8.62
1.84
1.96
2.38
2.79
3.29
3.72
4.14
4.60
5.21
5.76
60-min
1.51-1.79
1.80-2.14
2.19-2.59
2.563.04
2.99-3.57
3.38-4.04
3.74-4.51
4.12-5.00
4.63-5.68
5.07-6.29
4.118
2-hr
OB 988308
1.08-1..30
1.35-4.62
(1.60 7693)
(1.93 2.33)
(2. 2 2669)
(2.51 3.07
2. 2 3.47
3. 6-4.05
3.64-4.58
0.707
0.853
1.07
1.28
1.57
1.83
2.11
2.42
2.87
3.28
3-hr
0.642-0.788
0.776-0.947
0.967-1.18
1.16-1.42
1.41-1.73
(1.64-2.02
1.88-2.33
2.13-2.67
2.49-3.18
2.82-3.63
0.428
0.576
0.645
0.777
0.955
1.12
1.30
1.49
1.77
2.03
6-hr
0.387-0.482
0.467-0.579
0.582-0.725
0.699-0.872
0.853-1.07
0.994-1.25
1.14-1.44
1.30-1.88
1.52-1.97
1.73-2.27
12-hr
0.225-0283
0.272-0.341
0.341-0428
0.411-0518
0.504-0639
0.590-0.752
0.680-0874
0. 80--101
0.921--1'.21
1.05-21541
24hr
.395
0.133-0.6162
0.162-0.8197
0.2 9-0 255
0.248-0 303
0.305-0 374
0.352 0 438
0.404-0504
0.459-0.580
0.539-0895
0.606-0..795
85
00
2-day007
095
0. 93-0..1115
0.1019-0..1147
0.141-0175
0.174-0 216
0.201--0 22
0.231-0 93
0.2640 339
0.3 3-0410
0.353-0472
0.060
0.073
0.093
0.110
0.135
0.157
0.181
0.207
0.247
0.282
3day
O.O5S0.06
0.066-0.081
0.084-0.103
0.09-0.122
0.121-0.149
0.140-0.173
0.159-0.200
0.181-0.229
0.212-0.275
0.238-0.315
4-day
0044 0 053
0053-0 064
0.067--0 081
0078-0 095
0.095-06118
0.109-0..1134
0.123-0..153
0.139. 0 74
0.162-0 207
0.18 0 237
7day
00290035
0035-0.042
0.D44-0.053
0.051-0.062
0.062-0074
0070-0085
0079-0.97
0088.0.0109
0.101-0..1128
0.1112-0..1144
10dey
0023-0 028)
0028-0033
0034-0.041
0.040-0.047
0.047--0 057)
0054-0 065
0060-0 073
0.D6 -0 082
00 6-0095
0083-0B 06
20day
0001 B--O 01 B
00019-0 022
0023-0 027
00 6-0030
0031---0 036
0034-0 041
0038-0.045
0.042-0.051
0.D4 -0 058
0051---0 064
30day
0.
0.0000 015
00015.0 018
00019.0 021
0021---0 024
0024-0 028
0027 32
0030-0.035
00 2-0038
0036-0.043
0039-0.047
01-0
45dey
0 012
00113-0 015
0.0015-0018
00017--0 020
0020-0 023
00 2-0 26
0024-0 029
0027-0032
0030-0 038
0032-0.040
50
70
60dey
00010-0 till
00012-0 013
0001 0 O16
(000 017
0001 020)
00019-0022
00210-0 024
0023-0 026
0025 o 029
0026-0 032
1 Precipitation frequency (PF) estimates in this table are based on frequency analysis of partial duration series (PDS).
Numbers in parenthesis are PF estimates at lower and upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval. The probability that precipitation frequency estimates (for a
given duration and average recurrence interval) will be greater than the upper bound (or less than the lower bound) is 5%. Estimates at upper bounds are not
checked against probable maximum precipitation (PMP) estimates and may be higher than currently valid PMP values.
Please refer to NOAA Atlas 14 document for more information.
r-Frazrsrri
PF graphical
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
ow -MI -ID CITY

PDS-based intensity -duration -frequency (IDF) curves
Latitude: 35.1035a, Longitude:-77.03710
100.00
10.00
N
1.00
O
a+
5
0.10
001
�i
Duration
10.00
c
a
1.00
0.01
1000
L 2
5
10
25
50
100
200
500
NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 2, Version 3
Average recurrence interval (years)
Created (GMT): Tue Dec 17 19:09:58 2019
Back to To12
Maps & aerials
Small scale terrain
Average recurrence
mlerval
(years)
—1
2
— 5
10
25
50
100
200
500
1000
Duration
— Saran
— 2-clay
— 10-min
— 3-day
16a in
— 4-day
— 30•min
— 7-clay
— 60anin
— 10-day
— 2-fir
— 20-0ey
— 3fir
— 30alay
— "r
— 45-clay
— 12-hr
— 60-0ay
— 24-hr
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
j)CM-MHD CITY

eem
a
r w,t�n4Pa.
I also Hat s�
i 3km
CORGNL
2mi AIRPORT •;
Large scale tern
wrham Rocky Mount
Raleigh ' 1
trine.
Wilmington ' 011510w
• Ba:
100km
60mi
Large scale map
>ro
Durham Rocky Mount
Raleigh
L�
Greenville
i n
Fayetteville
r. —i—
Jacksonville
a
Wilmington
0
100km
60mi
Large scale aerial
�a
Pam1tro +
9
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

I-MNm. .
US Department of Commerce
National Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministMt M
National Weather Service
National Water Center
1325 East West Highway
Silver Spring, MD 20910
Questions?: [e-mail]-
Disclaimer
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

CALCULATIONS
Infiltration Basin Design Worksheet
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

Project:
Location:
Date:
Basin ID:
FNG•EERING
Infiltration Basin Design
New Bern Convention
1.00
Drainage Area (A) 0.04 JAcres
Impervious Area 0.04 Acres
% Impervious (1);�."'-_
Infiltration Basin Area (IBA) 214.82 SF
Water Quality, Volume
Calculate Rv: Rv = 0.05+.9 X I
Rv = -
WQV = 3630 X RD X Rv X A
R, = 1.50 Inch
WQV = 207 CIF
Surface Area
SA=FS* DV*12
K*T
SA = 62.7
Depth of Infiltration Basin:
Volume of Voids = Vtot -0.6 * Vtot = Wqv
Vtot * (1 - 0.6) = 207
Vtot = 1 517.28 = IBA * Depth
Depth = Vtot / IBA
Depth = 2.41
NOTE: Infiltration Basin Area is smaller than
the stone surface area. The IBA assumes
the patio footer extends 1.5' off the wall.
FS = Factor of SafetyM72
Min.
DV = Volume CF
K = IN/HR
T = Max Time Hours
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

Permit No.
(to be provided by DWC)
w''''A\�7F, p
©�" AA
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
O=0��P
o�<
NCDENR
401 CERTIFICATION APPLICATION FORM
C.i
INFILTRATION BASIN SUPPLEMENT
This form must be tilled out, printed and submitted.
The Required Items Checklist (Part 111) must be printed, filled out and submitted along wdh all of the required information.
I. PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Name
New Berm Riverside Convention Center Renovations - Phase 2
Contact Person
Kevin Vamell
Phone Number
252.459.8196
Date
1/29/2020
Drainage Area Number
1
II. DESIGN INFORMATION
Site Characteristics
Drainage area
1,742.00 ft3
Impervious area
1,742.00 Hz
Percent impervious
100.00 %
Design rainfall depth
1.50 in
Peak Flow Calculations
1-yr, 24-hr rainfall depth
3.52 in
1-yr, 24-hr intensity
0.15 inihr
Pre -development 1-yr, 24-hr discharge
0.26 ftIsec
Post -development I -yr, 24-hr discharge
0.02 ft3/sec
Pre/Post 1-yr, 24-hr peak Flow control
-0.24 ft3/sec
Storage Volume: Non -SA Waters
Minimum design volume required
ft3
Design volume provided
113
Storage Volume: SA Waters
1.5'runoff volume
207.00 ft3
Pre -development 1-yr, 24-hr runoff volume
108.00 H3
Post -development 1-yr, 24-hr runoff volume
492.00 H3
Minimum required volume
384.00 ft3
Volume provided
837.00 ft3 OK
Soils Report Summary
Soil type
Sandy
Infiltration rate
1.10 in/hr
SHWT elevation
-1.00 fmsl
Basin Design Parameters
Drawdown time
3.00 days OK
Basin side slopes
3.00 :1 OK
Basin bottom elevation
3.79 fmsl OK
Storage elevation
6.20 fmsl
Storage Surface Area
214.82 ff2
Top elevation
6.20 fmsi
Basin Bottom Dimensions
Basin length
52.00 ft
Basin width
5.82 If
RECEIVED
Bottom Surface Area
214.82 ft
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY
Form SW401-Infiltration Basin-Rev.5 11Ap2011 Parts I. & II. Design Summary, Page 1 of 3

Permit No.
(to be prov1den by DWQ)
Additional Information
Maximum runoff to each inlet to the basin?
0.06
ac-in
OK
Length of vegetative filter for overflow
52.00
It
OK
Distance to structure
NA
ft
OK
Distance from surface waters
50.00
ft
OK
Distance from water supply well(s)
NA
ft
OK
Separation from impervious soil layer
NA
ft
OK
Naturally occuring soil above shwt
2.41
It
OK
Bottom covered with 4-in of clean sand?
NA
(Y or N)
OK
Proposed drainage easement provided?
Y
(Y or N)
OK
Capures all runoff at ultimate build -out?
Y
(Y or N)
OK
Bypass provided for larger storms?
Y
(Y or N)
OK
Pretreatment device provided
No
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY
Form SW401-Infiltration Basin-Rev.5 11Ap2011 Parts 1.811. Design Summary, Page 2 of 3

Permit
(to be provided by DWQ)
III. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate the page or plan sheet numbers where the supporting documentation can be found. An incomplete submittal package will
result in a request for additional information. This will delay final review and approval of the project. Initial in the space provided to
indicate the following design requirements have been met. If the applicant has designated an agent, the agent may initial below. If a
requirement has not been met, attach justification.
Pagel Plan
Initials Sheet No.
JKV CE-04
1. Plans (1" - 50' or larger) of the entire site showing:
- Design at ultimate build -out,
- Off -site drainage (if applicable),
- Delineated drainage basins (include Rational C coefficient per basin),
- Basin dimensions,
- Pretreatment system,
- High flow bypass system,
- Maintenance access,
- Proposed drainage easement and public right of way (ROW),
- Overflow device, and
- Boundaries of drainage easement.
JKV CE-04
2. Partial plan (1" = 30' or larger) and details for the infiltration basin showing:
- Bypass structure,
- Maintenance access,
- Basin bottom dimensions,
- Basin cross-section with benchmark for sediment cleanout,
- Flow distribution detail for inflow,
- Vegetated filter, and
- Pretreatment device.
JKV CE-04
3. Section view of the infiltration basin (1" = 20' or larger) shoving:
- Pretreatment and treatment areas, and
- Inlet and outlet structures.
JKV CE-04
4. A table of elevations, areas, incremental volumes & accumulated volumes to verify the volume provided.
JKV CE-04
5. A soils report that is based upon an actual field investigation, soil borings, and infiltration tests. The
results of the soils report must be verified in the field by DWQ, by completing & submitting the soils
investigation request form. County soil maps are not an acceptable source of soils information.
JKV D-01
6. A construction sequence that shows how the infiltration basin will be protected from sediment until the
entire drainage area is stabilized.
JKV CALCS
7. The supporting calculations.
JKV OM
8. A copy of the signed and notarized operation and maintenance (0&M) agreement.
JKV NA 9. A copy of the deed restrictions (if required).
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY
Form SW401-Infiltration Basin-Rev.4 Page 3 of 3 Part III. Required Items Checklist, Page 3 of 3

ENG•EE RING
Infiltration Basin Design
Project: New Bern Convention Center
Location: New Bern, NC
Date: 16-Dec-19
Basin ID: 2.00
Drainage Area (A) 0.10 Acres
Impervious Area 0.09 Acres
% Impervious (1)
Infiltration Basin Area (IBA) 1 346.30 SF
Water Quality Volume
Calculate Rv: Rv = 0.05+.9 X I
Rv = 0.89
WQV = 3630 X RD X Rv X A
R� = 1.50 Inch
WC V = 486 CF
Surface Area
12
SA=FS* K T*
SA = 147.3
Depth of Infiltration Basin:
Volume of Voids = Vtot -0.6 * Vtot = Wqv
Vtot * (1 - 0.6) = 486
Vtot = 1215.61 = IBA * Depth
Depth = Vtot / IBA
Depth = 3.51
NOTE: Infiltration Basin Area is smaller than
the stone surface area. The IBA assumes
the footer extends 1.5' off the wall.
FS = Factor of Safetyffi72
Min.
DV = Volume CF
K = IN/HR
T = Max Time Hours
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

Permit No.
Ito be Provided by Dwcy
/�
©' ain
A
��p WTp9 G
3
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
NCDENR
401 CERTIFICATION APPLICATION FORM
o
INFILTRATION BASIN SUPPLEMENT
This form must be filled out, printed and submitted.
The Required Items Checklist (Part III) must be printed, filled out and submitted along with all of the required information.
I. PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Name
New Berm Riverside Convention Center Renovations - Phase 2
Contact Person
Kevin Varnell
Phone Number
252.459.8196
Date
1/29/2020
Drainage Area Number
2
II. DESIGN INFORMATION
Site Characteristics
Drainage area
4,391.00 tt2
Impervious area
4,078.00 ft2
Percent impervious
92.87 %
Design rainfall depth
1.50 in
Peak Flow Calculations
1-yr, 24-hr rainfall depth
3.52 in
1-yr,24-hrintensity
0.15 inrhr
Pre -development 1-yr, 24-hr discharge
0.26 ft3/sec
Post -development 1-yr, 24-hr discharge
0.02 ft3/sec
Pre/Post 1-yr,24-hrpeak flow control
424 t sec
Storage Volume: Non -SA Waters
Minimum design volume required
ft3
Design volume provided
ft
Storage Volume: SA Waters
1.5" runoff volume
486.00 ft3
Pre -development 1-yr, 24-hr runoff volume
108.00 fi3
Post -development 1-yr, 24-hr runoff volume
492.00 fi3
Minimum required volume
486.00 ft3
Volume provided
837.00 fi3 OK
Soils Report Summary
Soil type
Sandy
Infiltration rate
1.10 in/hr
SHWT elevation
-1.00 fmsl
Basin Design Parameters
Drawdown time
3.00 days OK
Basin side slopes
3.00 :1 OK
Basin bottom elevation
1.49 fmsl OK
Storage elevation
5.00 fmsl
Storage Surface Area
600.00 ft2
Top elevation
5.00 fmsl
Basin Bottom Dimensions
Basin length
50.00 It
RECEIVED
Basin width
12.00 It
Bottom Surface Area
600.00 ft
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY
Fona SW401-Infiaration Basin-Rev.5 11Apr2011 Parts I. a II. Design Summary, Page 1 of 3

Permit No.
(to be provided by DWO)
Additional Information
Maximum runoff to each inlet to the basin?
0.15
ac-in
OK
Length of vegetative filter for overflow
50.00
ft
OK
Distance to structure
NA
ft
OK
Distance from surface waters
50.00
ft
OK
Distance from water supplywell(s)
NA
ft
OK
Separation from impervious soil layer
NA
ft
OK
Naturally occudngsoil above shwt
2.00
tt
OK
Bottom covered with 4-in of clean sand?
NA
(Y or N)
OK
Proposed drainage easement provided?
Y
(Y or N)
OK
Capures all runoff at ultimate build -out?
Y
(Y or N)
OK
Bypass provided for larger storms?
Y
(Y or N)
OK
Pretreatment device provided
No
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY
Fonn SW401-Infiltration l3asin-Rev.5 itAp2011 Pans I. a II. Design Summary, Page 2 of 3

Permit
(to be provided by DWQ)
III. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate the page or plan sheet numbers where the supporting documentation can be found. An incomplete submittal package will
result in a request for additional information. This will delay final review and approval of the project. Initial in the space provided to
indicate the following design requirements have been met. If the applicant has designated an agent, the agent may initial below. If a
requirement has not been met, attach justification.
Pagel Plan
Initials Sheet No.
JKV CE-04 1. Plans (1" - 50' or larger) of the entire site showing:
- Design at ultimate build -out,
- Off -site drainage (if applicable),
- Delineated drainage basins (include Rational C coefficient per basin),
- Basin dimensions,
- Pretreatment system,
- High flow bypass system,
- Maintenance access,
- Proposed drainage easement and public right of way (ROW),
- Overflow device, and
- Boundaries of drainage easement.
JKV CE-04 2. Partial plan (1" = 30' or larger) and details for the infiltration basin shoving:
- Bypass structure,
- Maintenance access,
- Basin bottom dimensions,
- Basin cross-section with benchmark for sediment cleanout,
- Flow distribution detail for inflow,
- Vegetated filter, and
- Pretreatment device.
JKV CE-04 3. Section view of the infiltration basin 0" = 20' or larger) showing:
- Pretreatment and treatment areas, and
- Inlet and outlet structures.
JKV CE-04 4. A table of elevations, areas, incremental volumes & accumulated volumes to verify the volume provided.
JKV CE-04 5. A soils report that is based upon an actual field investigation, soil borings, and infiltration tests. The
results of the soils report must be verified in the field by DWQ, by completing & submitting the soils
investigation request form. County soil maps are not an acceptable source of soils information.
JKV D-01 6. A construction sequence that shows how the infiltration basin will be protected from sediment until the
entire drainage area is stabilized.
JKV CALCS 7. The supporting calculations.
JKV OM 8. A copy of the signed and notarized operation and maintenance (0&M) agreement.
JKV NA 9. A copy of the deed restrictions (if required).
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 202G
DCM-MHD CITY
Forth SW401-Infiltration Basin-Rev.4 Page 3 of 3 Part III. Required Items Checklist, Page 3 of 3

FRS
A llu 9.59
54
,\ PA TO
9151
PA TO �pPEpµP001)
7 9. 43
6 RISERS l6`µ6GP�16� INFILTRATION BASIN 1
® 6.1 EACH ��� 308 SF OF RIVER ROCK OVER THE A
PA 710
S9F-OD
�®
6.15
It4
SOD
6.15,
R6 I%Tt6 is
6.09
i
5.03
002' .
215 $F INFILTRATION ,BASIN 2.41',
IN DEPTH MIN. OF 40% VOIDS. SEE
CROSS SECTION DETAIL. /
FFE
9.59
„-
A FFE FFE
Q*a1 �. 4" ASS CAPPED 59 9,59
=i
PE ORATED PVC PIPE
PA TO��'- OBRVATION WELL. gJ
9.20 TO t 6.10
GS PA TO INI 4.95 PATIO
20 9.20 / 9.207 --1 6 RISE
®5.9" i4co�
��
45
4" BRASS CAOPEO '
PERFORATED PVC PIPE r'
OBSERVATION WELL:
TOP t 5.00
INV. 1.49
i
TOW 6.00
GRO f 5.43 1
GRD 5.00
.00 MA TC,
5, 34 SW f
ii
INFILTRATI
RECEIVED 346 I46 SF t`
DEPTH MII
C DI MAR 0 2 2020 CROSS SE
C TOP 5.15
DCM-MHD CITY

CALCULATIONS
Curve Number Calculations
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

•
ENGINEERING
Curve Numbers
Project:
New Bern Riverfront Convention Center
Location:
New Bern, NC
Date:
17-Dec-19
Pre Development
Curve Number
Infiltration Basin
1
64.08
Infiltration Basin
2
72,45
Post Development
Curve Number
Infiltration Basin
1
6408
Infiltration Basin
2
6408
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

Project:
Location:
Date:
Basin ID:
Drainage Area (A)
Curve Numbers
Riverfront Convention Center
17-Dec-19
Area 1
•
ENGINEERING
0.04 1 Acres
Runoff Curve Numbers
Cover Description
Cover Type and Hydrologic Condition I A I Area (ac)I 13 1 Area (ac)I C I Area (ac)I D I Area ac
Cultivated Land
Without Conservation Treatment
72
81
1
88
91
With Conservation Treatment
62
71
78
81
Wood of Forest Land
Poor Cover Thin
45
66
77
83
Good Cover
25
55
70
77
Open Spence lawns, parks, cemeteries, etc
Poor Condition
(grass cover <50%
68
79
86
89
Fair Condition
(grass cover50%-75%
49
69
79
84
Good Condition
(grass cover>75%
39
0.023
61
74
80
Impervious Area
Parking Lots, Roofs, Drives, etc.
1 98 1 0.017
98
98
98
Soil Area per Hydrologic Group
1 1 0.04
1 0
1
1 0
1
1 0
Drainage Area = Area Total
Weighted Curve Number
CN = [(CNi*Ai)+ (CNn`An))/Atot
TRUE 0.04 = 0.04
Pre Development Area 1 Curve Number 64.08
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

Project:
Location:
Date:
Basin ID:
Drainage Area (A)
•
ENGINEERING
Curve Numbers
New Bern Riverfront Convention Center
New Bern, NC
17-Dec-19
0.1 Acres
Runoff Curve Numbers
Cover Description
Cover Type and Hydrologic Condition I A Area (ac)I B I Area ac C I Area (ac)I D I Area ac
Cultivated Land
Without Conservation Treatment
1 72
1
1 81
1
88
91
With Conservation Treatment
62
71
78
81
Wood of Forest Land
Poor Cover Thin
45
66
77
83
Good Cover
25
55
70
77
Open S ante lawns, parks, cemeteries, etc
Poor Condition
(grass cover <50%
68
79
86
89
Fair Condition
(grass cover 50%-75%
49
69
79
84
Good Condition
(grass Cover >75%
39
0.0433
61
74
80
Impervious Area
Parking Lots, Roofs, Drives, etc.
98 1 0.0567
1 98
98
98
Soil Area per Hydrologic Group
0.1
1
1 0
0
0
Drainage Area = Area Total
Weighted Curve Number
CN = [(CNi*Ai)+ (CNn'An)]/Atot
TRUE 1 0.1 = 0.1
Pre Development Area 2 Curve Number %2.45
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

Project:
Location:
Date:
Basin ID:
Drainage Area (A)
Curve Numbers
New Bem Riverfront Convention Center
Infiltration Basin 1
ENG EERING
0.04 Acres
Runoff Curve Numbers
Cover Description
Cover Type and Hydrologic Condition I A Area ac B I Area ac C I Area ac D I Area ac
Cultivated Land
Without Conservation Treatment
1 72
1
1 81
1
1 88
91
With Conservation Treatment
62
1
1 71
1
1 78
81
Wood of Forest Land
Poor Cover(Thin)
45
1
1 66
1
1 77
83
Good Cover
25
1
55
70
77
Open Spence lawns, parks, cemeteries, etc
Poor Condition
(grass cover <50%
68
79
86
89
Fair Condition
(grass cover 50%-76%
49
69
79
84
Good Condition
(grass cover >75%
39
0.023
61
74
80
Impervious Area
Parking Lots, Roofs, Drives, etc.
98
1 0.017
1 98
1
1 98
98
Soil Area per Hydrologic Group
0.04
1
1 0
1
1 0
0
Drainage Area = Area Total
Weighted Curve Number
CN = I(CNI.AI)+ (CNn"A,)]/Atot
TRUE 1 0.04 = 0.04
Post Development Area 2 to Sand Filter .08
Curve Number
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

•
ENGINEERING
Curve Numbers
Project:
New Bern Riverfront Convention Center
Location:
New Bern, NC
Date:
17-Dec-19
Basin ID:
Infiltration Basin 2
Drainage Area (A) 1 0.1 1 Acres
Runoff Curve Numbers
Cover Description
Cover Type and Hydrologic Condition I A I Area (ac)I B I Area (ac) I C I Area (ac)I D I Area ac
Cultivated Land
Without Conservation Treatment
1 72
1
1 81
1
1 88
1
1 91
With Conservation Treatment
1 62
1
1 71
1
1 78
1
1 81
Wood of Forest Land
Poor Cover Thin
45
66
1
1 77
1
1 83
Good Cover
1 25
55
1
1 70
1
1 77
Open S ance lawns, parks, cemeteries, etc
Poor Condition
(grass cover <50%
68
79
86
89
Fair Condition
(grass cover 50%-75%
49
69
79
84
Good Condition
ss cover >75%
39
0.023
61
74
80
Area
Lots, Roofs, Drives, etc.
g
98 0.017
98
98
98
er Hydrologic Group 1
1 0.04
1 1
0
1 1 0
1
1 0
Drainage Area = Area Total
Weighted Curve Number
CN = I(CN,*A,)+ (CNn'An)]/Atot
FALSE 1 0.1 = 0.04
Post Development Area 2 to Dry 64.08
Detention Curve Number
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

CALCULATIONS
Stormwater Routing
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

1
Watershed Model Schematic
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.22
1 -Pre Development Areal 2 - Post Into Infil 1 3 - Pre Development Area 2
5 - Post Infil 1 Lr
Y 7-Total Pre
Post Into Infl 2
Y a - Total Post RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY
Project: Infiltration Basin 1 -yr 24-hr.gpw
Thursday, Jan 30, 2020

Hydrograph Return Period Recap
HydraBow Hydrographs by Intelisolva v9.22
Hyd.
Hydrograph
Inflow
Peak Outflow (ofs)
Hydrograph
No.
type
Hyd(s)
description
(origin)
1-Yr
2-Yr
3-Yr
6-Yr
10-Yr
25-Yr
50-Yr
100-Yr
1
SCS Runoff
-----
0.049
----
---
-----
-------
-------
-------
Pre Development Area 1
2
SCS Runoff
------
0.207
----
—
----
----
----
--
-----
Post Into Infil 1
3
SCS Runoff
----
0.214
-----
--
-----
----
-----
--
—•---
Pre Development Area 2
4
SCS Runoff
-----
0.483
---
----
----
---
--
—
Post Into Infil 2
5
Reservoir
2
0.019
--•--
--
-----
---
--
--
Post Infil 1
6
Reservoir
4
0.000
---
---
----
---
---
Post Infil 2
7
Combine
1, 3,
0,263
---
--
---
---
Total Pre
8
Combine
5, 6,
0.019
---
--
--
----
---
Total Post
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY
Proj. file: Infiltration Basin 1-yr 24-hr.gpvv
Thursday, Jan 30, 2020

Hydrograph Summary Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.22
Hyd.
No.
Hydrograph
type
(origin)
Peak
flow
(cfs)
Time
interval
(min)
Time to
peak
(min)
Hyd.
volume
(cult)
Inflow
hyd)s)
Maximum
elevation
(ft)
Total
strge used
(tuft)
Hydrograph
description
1
SCS Runoff
0.049
1
718
108
----
--
----
Pre Development Area 1
2
SCS Runoff
0.207
1
717
492
--
--
--
Post Into Infil 1
3
SCS Runoff
0.214
1
718
433
—
Pre Development Area 2
4
SCS Runoff
0.483
1
717
1,061
—
Post Into Infil 2
5
Reservoir
0.019
1
736
17
2
5.43
208
Post Infil 1
6
Reservoir
0.000
1
635
0
4
3.82
554
Post Infii 2
7
Combine
0.263
1
718
541
1, 3,
Total Pre
8
Combine
0.019
1
736
17
5, 6,
--
Total Post
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY
Infiltration Basin 1-yr 24-hr.gpw
Return Period: 1 Year
Thursday, Jan 30, 2020

4
Hydrograph Report
HydraBow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.22
Hyd. No. 1
Pre Development Area 1
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Storm frequency
= 1 yrs
Time interval
= 1 min
Drainage area
= 0.040 ac
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Tc method
= USER
Total precip.
= 3.52 in
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Q (cfs)
0.10
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
Thursday, Jan 30, 2020
Peak discharge = 0.049 cfs
Time to peak
= 718 min
Hyd. volume
= 108 cuft
Curve number
= 64.1
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 5.00 min
Distribution
= Type II
Shape factor
= 484
Pre Development Area 1
Hyd. No. 1 -- 1 Year
Q (cfs)
0.10
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00 1 1 1 i 1 1 11 I - 0.00
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560
Time (min)
— Hyd No. 1 RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

5
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.22
Hyd. No. 2
Post Into Infil 1
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Storm frequency
= 1 yrs
Time interval
= 1 min
Drainage area
= 0.040 ac
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Tc method
= USER
Total precip.
= 3.52 in
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Post Into Infil 1
Thursday, Jan 30, 2020
Peak discharge = 0.207 cfs
Time to peak
= 717 min
Hyd. volume
= 492 cuft
Curve number
= 98
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 5.00 min
Distribution
= Type II
Shape factor
= 484
Q (ofs) Hyd. No. 2 — 1 Year Q (ofs)
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.40
0.40
0.35
0.35
0.30
0.30
0.25
0.25
0.20
0.20
0.15
0.15
0.10
0.10
0.05
0.05
n nn
0.00
0 120
— Hyd No. 2
240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200
Time (min)
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.22
Hyd. No. 3
Pre Development Area 2
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Storm frequency
= 1 yrs
Time interval
= 1 min
Drainage area
= 0.100 ac
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Tc method
= USER
Total precip.
= 3.52 in
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Q (cfs)
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
Thursday, Jan 30, 2020
Peak discharge = 0.214 cfs
Time to peak
= 718 min
Hyd. volume
= 433 cuft
Curve number
= 72.4
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 5.00 min
Distribution
= Type II
Shape factor
= 484
Pre Development Area 2
Hyd. No. 3 — 1 Year
Q (cfs)
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00 0.00
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560
— Hyd No. 3
RECEJ gg�nin)
MAR 0 2 Z020
[ACM-MHD CITY

7
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.22
Hyd. No. 4
Post Into Infil 2
Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff
Storm frequency = 1 yrs
Time interval
= 1 min
Drainage area
= 0.100 ac
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Tc method
= USER
Total precip.
= 3.52 in
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Post into Infil 2
Thursday, Jan 30, 2020
Peak discharge = 0.483 cfs
Time to peak
= 717 min
Hyd. volume
= 1,061 cuft
Curve number
= 93.8
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 5.00 min
Distribution
= Type II
Shape factor
= 484
Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 4 -- 1 Year Q (Cfs)
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.40
0.40
0.35
0.35
0.30
0.30
0.25
0.25
0.20
0.20
0.15
0.15
0.10
0.10
0.05
0.05
n nn
0.00
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960
— Hyd No. 4
1080 1200
RECEIVED in)
MAR 0 2 2020
DCM-MHD CITY