Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
18-21 Application
`1URBign 530 `%Jalnal $tree)) Philnd�lph'v,, Ea 11136 ANGINEERy zis zz.aoa� December 15, 2020 Amanda Cannon NC Division of Coastal Management Department of Environmental Quality 400 Commerce Avenue Morehead City, NC 28557 Subject: Major Permit Application —Additional Copy of Application Package Maintenance Dredging at National Gypsum Company's Wilmington, NC Facility 838 Sunnyvale Drive, Wilmington, NC Dear Ms. Cannon: Urban Engineers, Inc. (Urban), on behalf of National Gypsum Company (NGC), is submitting an additional hard copy of the Major Permit Application for maintenance dredging at NGC's Wilmington, NC berthing facility, located) at 838 Sunnyvale Drive, Wilmington, NC Please contact me at jlwatersQurbanenaineers com or 215-922-8081 extension 1292 with any questions. Sincerely, URBAN ENGINEERS, INC. Jennifer L. Waters, PE, LEED® AP Senior Environmental Engineer Enclosure TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 - Form DCM MP-1 Section 2 - Form DCM MP-2 Section 3 - Topo & Aerial Maps Section 4 - Project Drawings Section 5 - Project Narrative Section 6 - Application Fee, Section 7 - Deed Section 8 - Agent Authorization Form Section 9 - Wetland Delineation Section 10 - Adjacent Property Owner Notice Section 11 - Stormwater Management Section 12 - Ocean and Inlet Hazard Section 13 - Historic Permits Section 14 - Biological Assessment & Essential Habitat Study Section 15 - i Sediment Sampling Section 16 - Scoping Meeting Minutes Section 17 - Avoidance & Minimization Measures Section 18 - Letter of Permission Section 19 - USACE Eng Form 4345 Section 20 - Navigation Plan North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of CoastalManagement cc Major Permit Application Section 1—DCMMP-1 Form UReAn■ LAMA MAJOR PERMIT APPLICATION SECTION 1- FORM DCM MP-1 As required for the CAMA Major Permit Applications, Form DCM MP-1 was completed and attached in this section. APPLICATION for Major Development Permit (last revised 12127106) North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT 1."Primary%Applicant/ Landownerinformation . Business Name National Gypsum Company Project Name (if applicable) National Gypsum Wilmington Maintenance Dredging Applicant 1: First Name Meghan MI Last Name Zehringer Applicant 2: First Name MI Last Name If additional applicants, please attach an additional page(s) with names listed. Mailing Address 2001 Rexford Road PO Box City Charlotte State NC ZIP 28211 Country USA Phone No. 704-365-7300 ext. FAX No. 704-365-7316 Street Address (if different from above) City State ZIP Email MeghanZ@NationaIGypsum.com 2. Agent/Contractorinformation } , Business Name Urban Engineers, Inc. Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name MI i Last Name Jennifer L Waters Agentl Contractor 2: First Name MI Last Name Mailing Address PO Box City State 530 Walnut Street Philadelphia PA ZIP Phone No. 1 Phone No. 2 19106 215-922-8081 ext.1292 215-284-3125 ext. FAX No. Contractor # 215 922 8082 Street Address (if different from above) City State ZIP Email jlwaters@urbanengineers.com <Form continues on back> 252-808.2808 :: 1-888-411COAST :: www.nccoastaimanagement.net Form DCM MP-1 (Page 2 of 5) APPLICATION for Major Development Permit 3. Project L'ocadon County (can be multiple) Street Address State Rd. # New Hanover 838 Sunnyvale Drive N/A Subdivision Name City State Zip N/A Wilmington NC 28412- Phone No. Lot No.(s) (if many, attach additional page with list) 910 - 799 - 3954 ext. 002-OOB, I I , a. In which NC river basin is the project located? b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project Cape Fear River Basin Cape Fear River c. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade? d. Name the closest majorwater body to the proposed project site. ®Natural ❑Manmade []Unknown Cape Fear River e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction? I. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed ®Yes []No work falls within. Wilmington 4. Site Description , YS t a. Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.) b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.) 1,300 —59,000 c. Size of individual lot(s) d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or N/A I I NWL (normal water level) (if many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list) 1 ❑NHW or ®NWL e. Vegetation on tract The maintenance dredging project area is located within the Cape Fear River; there is no vegetation in the project area. Due to past maintenance dredging and past use of the area by large ships, submerged vegetation is not located within the project area. No wetlands are located in the proposed maintenance dredge area. The confined disposal facility (CDF), located across the Cape Fear River, where the dredge material will be placed, is primarily barren in the area where the dredge material will be placed. I. Man-made features and uses now on tract The maintenance dredging project area is located within the Cape Fear River and is adjacent to the ship berthing at National Gypsum's Wilmington facility used to offload gypsum so that National Gypsum can manufacture drywall. National Gypsum's waterfront consists of three pile supported dolphins, one of which contains a hopper tower, pile supported walkways, and a long pile supported accessway that also supports a conveyor. The CDF currently consists of a large area where dredge disposal material has previously been placed. A weir and piping is also present on the CDF. g. Identify and describe the existing land uses adjacent to the proposed project site. Adjacent property to National Gypsum consists of industrial and commercial developed properties; Kinder Morgan Terminals Wilmington LLC is to the north and Port Cape Fear Associates is to the south. h. How does local government zone the tract? I. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning? Industrial (Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable) ®Yes []No ❑NA j. Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? []Yes NNo k. Hasa professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. []Yes NNo [_]NA If yes, by whom? I. Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a []Yes NNo ❑NA National Register listed or eligible propeV. 252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastaimanagement.net Form DCM MP-1 (Page 3 of 5) APPLICATION for <Form continues on next page> Major Development Permit m. (i) Are there wetlands on the site? []Yes NNo (ii) Are there coastal wetlands on the site? ❑Yes NNo (iii) If yes to either (i) or (if) above, has a delineation been conducted? ®Yes ❑No (Attach documentation, if available) n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities. The proposed maintenance dredging project area is located in the Cape Fear River, adjacent to the National Gypsum berth. The CDF is vacant land used for dredged material storage. There are no existing wastewater treatment facilities in these areas. o. Describe existing drinking water supply source. The proposed maintenance dredging project area is located in the Cape Fear River, adjacent to the National Gypsum berth. The CDF is vacant land used for dredged material storage. There are no existing drinking water supply sources in these areas. p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems. The proposed maintenance dredging project area is located in the Cape Fear River, adjacent to the National Gypsum berth. The CDF is vacant land used for dredged material storage. No stormwater management or treatment systems are present in the maintenance dredge area since this area is located within the river. Turbidity curtains will be utilized within the maintenance dredging project area. 5. Activities and Impacts j a. Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use? "' NCommercial ❑Public/Governmenl ❑PrivatefCommunity b. Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete. National Gypsum Company uses the facility for unloading gypsum for wallboard production at the wallboard plant across River Road. Daily operations will be able to continue when the project is complete. If the berthing area is not dredged, there will be a significant negative impact to the operations at the National Gypsum Wilmington facility. c. Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type of equipment and where it is to be stored. The maintenance dredging will occur via hydraulic dredging (cutter suction) to dredge the material to -36' MLW +-2' overdredge. Mechanical dredging via clamshell may also be utilized in locations within the dredge area where timber inhibits the use of hydraulic dredging. Dredging equipment will be stored at the berth until the maintenance dredging is complete. The maintenance dredging is expected to take approximately 2 weeks to complete. The hydraulically dredged material will be pumped (booster pump) to the CDF via a pipeline sunken down to the river bottom. The dredged material will be discharged at the CDF, which will be isolated by an earthen berm. After the dredged material is placed in the isolated area, effluent will drain back to the river in a controlled manner through a strategically placed weir. An excavator or bulldozer will be used to spread dredge material during disposal. The mechanically dredged material will be transported and stored via barge. d. List all development activities you propose. The proposed project consists of maintenance dredging to -36' MLW + -2 MLW in order to continue operations at National Gpysum. A total of approxiamtely 17,000 cubic yards of material will be dredged. No new activities will occur as a result of the maintenance dredging.The dredge material will be placed on a property that has been used as a CDF in the past. e. Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? The proposed project is a maintenance project and consists of redredging the area near the berth that has been dredged in the past. The dredge material will be placed on an existing CDF. I. What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project? 1.5 ❑Sq.Ft or ®Acres g. Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area ❑Yes NNo ❑NA that the public has established use of? 252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastaimanagement.net Form DCM MP-1 (Page 4 of 5) APPLICATION for Major Development Permit h. Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state. No discharges will occur as part of the maintenance dredging. The effluent from the dewatered dredge material will drain back into the Cape Fear River in a controlled manner through a strategically placed weir. Both the weir elevation and effluent content will be monitored to stay within permitted effluent parameters. An effluent monitoring plan will be prepared for approval by the state and Corps prior to the onset of dredge disposal. I. Will wastewater or stornwater be discharged into a wetland? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water? ❑Yes ❑No ®NA there any mitigation proposed? If yes, attach a mitigation proposal. <Form continues on back> 6: Additional information ' In addition to this completed application form, (INP-1)the'lollowmg ifeme'below, if applicable, must besubmittedimorderfor the application -package to be complete. Items,(a),— (():are always applicable to any major; development application. Please consulfthe application' , , instruction booklet'on how to property prepare the required items below: a. A project narrative. b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish between work completed and proposed. c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site. d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties. e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR. f. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management. Name Kinder Morgan Terminals Wilmington LLC. ,. Phone No. 910-763-0104 Address 3340River Road, Wilmington, NC 28412 Name Port Cape Fear Associates, LLC Phone No. 910-395-5055 Address 3410 River Road, Wilmington, NC 28412 ,,:. • ... Phone No. .dame .._ -. r - .. �. Address - e -. , • . _ •. g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permittee, and issuing dates. NC Division of Coastal Management Permit No. 102-94 NC Division of Coastal Management Permit Renewal No. 102- (September 14, 1994) 94 (February 18, 1998 & April 21, 2003) USACE DA Permit Action No. 199403672 NC Division of Coastal Management Permit Modification No. 102-94 (November 17, 2003) h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, if applicable. I. Welland delineation, if necessary. j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner) k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10), if necessary. If the project involves expenditure of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act. t., cernrfcarfon anct eermfssion to tnrer on'Lana. I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application. The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit. I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up monitoring of the project. 252-808-2808 :: 7.688-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastaimanagement.net Form DCM MP-1 (Page 5 of 5) APPLICATION for r Major Development Permit I further certify that the Information provided in this application Is truthful to the best of my knowledge. Date A S EP ZO Print Name _Meghan Zehringer Signature Please indicate application attachments pertainingt your proposed project. MDCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information ❑DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts ❑DCM MP-3 Upland Development ❑DCM MP-4 Structures Information 252-808-2808 :: 1.888.4RCOA8T :: www.ncconstaimanagament.net North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality T Division of Coastal Management AN �•L Major Permit Application M Section 2—DCMMP2 Form mok -J :) URBAn■ CAMA MAJOR PERMITAPPLICATION SECTION 2 - FORM DCM MP-2 National Gypsum Company plans to perform maintenance dredging activities at their Wilmington, NC facility and the dredged material will be placed on a confined disposal facility located across the Cape Fear River from the dredge area. Therefore, as part of the Major Application package, Form DCM MP-2 (Excavation and Fill) was completed and included in this section. Form DCM MP-2 EXCAVATION and FILL (Except for bridges and culverts) Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Farm DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information. Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation and/or fill activities. All values should be given in feet. Access Other Channel (NLW or Canal Boat Basin Boat Ramp Rock Groin Rock Breakwater (excluding shoreline NWL stabilization Length N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NIA 1000 Width N/A N/A NA N/A N/A N/A 130 Avg. Existing N/A N/A N/A N/A -' NA NA- 24 Depth Final Project N/A N/A N/A N/A NA. -36+-2 Depth DNA - Overdredge a. Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or NWL in cubic yards. 17,000 c. (i) Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square feet affected. ❑CW ❑SAV []SB ❑WL ®None (l) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas: The material is required to be dredged so ships can safely berth at National Gypsum's (NG) Wilmington facility. The ships deliver gypsum so that wallboard can be produced at the NG Wilmington facility. Daily operations will be able to continue when the project is complete. If the berthing area is not dredged, there will be a significant negative impact to the operations at the National Gypsum Wilmington facility. 2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL a. Location of disposal area. Brunswick County Parcel 05900006 c. (i) Do you claim title to disposal area? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA (it) If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner. ,. ❑ This .section not to. Type of material to be excavated. silt, clay and sand d. High -ground excavation in cubic yards. N/A b. Dimensions of disposal area. 675 fit (W) x 1,760 it (L) d. (i) Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance? ®Yes []No ❑NA (ii) If yes, where? Same Location e. (i) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh f. (i) Does the disposal include any area in the water? _ (CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), [--]Yes ®No ❑NA or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square feet affected. (ii) If yes, how much water area is affected? ®CW <300 ❑SAV _ ❑SB N/A 252.808.2808 n 1-888.4RCOAST :: www.nccoastalmanagement.net revised: 12/26/06 i Form DCM MP-2 (Excavation and Fiil, Page 2 of 3) r OWL _ ❑None (ii) Describe the purpose of disposal in these areas: Dredged material from the proposed maintenance dredge location near NG's Wilmington berth must be removed and placed in the CDF so that ships can safely berth and unload gypsum. 3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION ®"This section not applicable (if development is a wood groin„use,MP-4 — Structures) a. Type of shoreline stabilization: b. Length: []Bulkhead ❑Riprap ❑Breakwater/Sill ❑Other: c. Average distance waterward of NHW or NWL: e. Type of stabilization material: g. Number of square feet of fill to be placed below water level. Bulkhead backfill _ Riprap Breakwater/Sill_ Other_ i. Source of fill material. Width: _ d. Maximum distance walerward of NHW or NWL, f. (i) Has there been shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months? ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA (it) If yes, state amount of erosion and source of erosion amount information. h. Type of fill material. j4.1 OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES This section not applicable f(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization). a. (i) Will fill material be brought to the site? ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA b. (i) Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), If yes, submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or (ii) Amount of material to be placed in the water _ other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square feet affected. (iii) Dimensions of fill area _ ❑CW ❑SAV _ ❑SB (iv) Purpose of fill OWL ❑None (it) Describe the purpose of the fill in these areas: 5., GENERAL a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion b. What type of construction equipment will be used (e.q., dragline, controlled? The dredged material will be placed on the CDF on high ground and isolated by a berm. The dredge material discharge will be monitored and the material will be moved around on the site as necessary. Effluent will be contained in pipes and discharged at a point in the water past visible vegetation and below the normal high water line to prevent gully erosion and unnecessary siltation. A water control structure will be installed at the intake end of the effluent pipe to assure compliance with water quality standards. backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)? Hydraulic dredge (cutter section) and possibly mechanical dredging in areas with excessive timber. A booster pump and pipeline will be required to dispose of the dredged material. An excavator or backhoe will be used to spread the dredge material on the disposal site. 252-808-2808 :: 1.888-4RCOAST:: w mccoastaimanaaement.net revised: 12126/06 Form DCM MP-2 (Excavation and Fill, Page 3 of 3) C. (1) WIII navi alional aids be required as a result of the project? ❑Yes Co ❑NA (11) If yes, explain what type and how they will be Implemented. NIA Date. ._.. ,;,,.... - .. .._ ... . National Gypsum Maintdgance Dieilgirig, Project Name Meghan,Zehdnger .... Appllcaid /N�am/ef p0.. ,AJr d. (1) Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project site? ®Yes ❑No ❑NA (II) If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize envbonmenlal impacts. The wetland around the disposal area will not be permanently Impacted from the dredge disposal. Minimal temporary Impacts to the wetland may occur to transport construction equipment to the site and for the dredge material temporary pipeline placement. Efforts witl be made to avoid or minimize temporary Welland impacts to the greatest extent possible by selecting a feasible temporary pipeline and equipment crossing location in an area with the smallest amount of we0andslf wetlands must be temporarily Impacted, timber crane mats will be temporarily placed on the wetlands to allow construction equipment to cross. All temporarily Impacted wetlands will be restored to the original condition, 252.808.2808 :: 1.888.4RCOA5T :: www.neccastalmananement.not revised: 12/26106 I CNorth Carolina Department of Environmental Quality ccDivision of Coastal Management Major Permit Application m Section 3 —Topo & Aerial Maps URBRn■ CAMA MAJOR PERMIT APPLICATION SECTION 3 - TOPO & AERIAL MAPS The following maps are included in this section: Figure 3a: USGS Topographic Map of the Maintenance Dredge Area & Private Confined Disposal Facility Figure 3b: Aerial Site Location of the Maintenance Dredge Area& Proposed Dredge Area Figure 3c: Aerial Site Location of the National Gypsum Facility and Proposed Dredge Area o� m w, o_ 9 m CD J in N J a m w C _C Do Co CD w w D o o w n o o Ca CD _ f!1 J • • w_ A w co A co ' V co m V C?C T G AW VV V Z cn Z 4 N VI IA Z w W w O C G w < p� 0 c v J 3 = w G n = w 3 O m ca 3, oa 0 0 Z �+ 7 � w z �. n = —► Z 0 0 0 A a E7 CD t r Yy 14 t . R F rj m x Island r t t + ,n #R+20i8'Google t� e ;a7 OZ m f /�'{� �• i rk att �'I � Y k.yw,vr ._' \` P f a-..s+^•�s,+e IN 4 }, Dredge Area • } at }. � ` ��+yell r+`:. 'l># + � � � �,� •8 QvL ,�A �•� � 4 a n VS+ t� �a t..t. ,� y I j7.• � V ` S`unnyvele yt r. 4f5f'+$Ck tS�! \ J[" I 1 •. _ �' arty+.. � -) J< , '�'� 3lli f i {Cl( u' i„ q.•.'_ q ��� � ' �; t ti• .�, � t 4r t, i j {�,�; . BryanlRo`ad .. a s l y i.'.�• T 't 't (4t t t Ac .ti 5 •'I L(• N •. S ('� i. • r /�'' • i h ....', 1�, t ;i, lL �y ' t� S 1•t . j w. r y 3. i � _ �•>��t a�.4 f{ (: ;++ t +'i a "'�.r7 i. rs"i.W'�G �•� V� �X 0 I `ty as .,Ie fi]� �` r i� + f t.�"'a. �yr '� �• ...I'` F.� on Jj _ # nS t� F' 1A F Gap National4 -d_- Area Sunnyvale838 North Carolina Department of Environmental Qualiry CDivision of Coastal Management Major Permit Application QSection 4—Project Drawings J� URBAn■ CAMA MAJOR PERMIT APPLICATION SECTION 4 - PROJECT DRAWINGS Drawings of the proposed maintenance dredging project area included in this section. CNorth Carolina Department of Environmental Quality �T Division of Coastal Management im Major Permit Application t % , m Section 5—Project Narrative UABAn■ CAMA MAJOR PERMIT APPLICATION SECTION 5 - PROJECT NARRATIVE A narrative description of the project is provided below. National Gypsum Wilmington — Maintenance Dredge -1- Project Narrative t Project Narrative National Gypsum Wilmington — Maintenance Dredging Project Name: National Gypsum Wilmington Maintenance Dredging Project Description: The proposed project includes maintenance dredging at National Gypsum's Wilmington commercial berth facility to a depth of -36' MLW (-12,000 cubic yards of material) and -2 feet overdredge (-5,000 cubic yards of material) in order to continue National Gypsum's operations at their Wilmington Facility. This project consists of dredging approximately 17,000 cubic yards of silt, clay, and sand from the navigable waters of the United States. The dredge quantities were calculated based on the latest sounding. The dredge material will be disposed at a private confined disposal facility (CDF) located in Brunswick County (ParcelI No. 05900006) at approximately 34.176788 N, - 77.963510 W, which is directly across the river from the proposed maintenance dredging area. The proposed project will require a Section 404/10 permit and a CAMA Major Permit. This project is considered maintenance dredging since the berthing area was dredged in the past. No portion of this maintenance dredging project has been completed yet. Owner's Contact Ms. Meghan Zehringer Engineering Project Manager Waterways National Gypsum Company 2ooi Rexford Road Charlotte, NC 28211 (704) 365-7268 (phone) (704) 365-73i6 (fax) Where: National Gypsum Company 838 Sunnyvale Drive Wilmington, NC 28412 Engineer's Contact Mr. Peter Brennan, PE Deputy Practice Leader, Ports & Urban Engineers, Inc. 530 Walnut Street, 14th Floor Philadelphia, PA igio6-3586 (215) 922-8080 (phone) (215) 922-8082 (fax) Project Purpose and Need: Maintenance dredging is imperative at the National Gypsum Wilmington facility in order for National Gypsum to continue their operations in this region. This area has not been dredged since at least the early 2000s and therefore there is a significant need to deepen the berthing area to ensure the safe passage of ships and to accommodate the ships required for National Gypsum to receive gypsum shipments. If the berthing area is not dredged, this wile lead to significant financial implications for National Gypsum and ultimately impact the local economy. The proposed dredging is anticipated to occur in 2021. The proposed dredging will not change the use of the site. Site Background and Current Conditions: The proposed approximately 2.5-acre maintenance dredging area is owned by National Gypsum Company (NGC) and is located in the Cape Fear River (Stream Classification "SC") at approximately Lat: 34.17375 N, Long: - 75.957511 W in New Hanover County, The area to be dredged is National Gypsum's berth in the Cape Fear River. The Cape Fear River bottom material in the vicinity of the proposed maintenance dredging area is composed of silt, clay, sand and some wood debris, per the sediment sampling in November 2019. The project area is located in open water with depths ranging from approximately -12 MLW to -37 MLW. Due to past maintenance dredging and National Gypsum Wilmineton — Maintenance Dredee -2- Proiect Narrative frequent use of the area by large ships, submerged vegetation is not located within the project area. National Gypsum Company uses the facility for unloading gypsum for wallboard production at the wallboard plant across River Road. The manufacturing facilities are located on the east side of SR iioo with a conveyor belt crossing the highway to the property on the west side. The conveyor continues along a pier extending into Cape Fear River terminating on the shipping berth. There is a paved access way from SR iloo to the river. The existing berthing facility extends approximately 1,68o feet into the Cape Fear River, with a dock extending approximately 195 feet to the north of the pier. The National Gypsum Wilmington facility was constructed in 1975, at which time the river adjacent to the berth was dredged to a depth of 35 feet MLW. Maintenance dredging occurred at the site at regular intervals until the 19gos or early 2000s. The National Gypsum plant was shut down in early 2009 and;then resumed shipping in 2018. The adjacent property land use consists of mixed industrial and commercially developed properties. National Gypsum is located in a highly industrial area, with adjacent activities including fuel processing plants and commercial ports; all have commercial docks. The channel of the Cape Fear River is continually maintained for commercial navigation by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)J The area where the dredged material' will be stored is approximately 25 acres and has previously been used as a dredged material disposal facility. National Gypsum has utilized this disposal facility for dredged material disposal as recent as the 2000s. This site is owned _ by Bate, Land and Timber (BLT) Trust. The adjacent properties are vacant. I Proposed Dredging Methodology The proposed maintenance dredging will be performed via hydraulic dredging (cutter suction dredge) and mechanical dredging. The hydraulic dredging will consist of a cutter head and a hydraulic booster pump. The cutter head will be lowered into the sediment bed to fluidize the sediment agitation and to draw the slurry into the suction pipe. The material will then be pumped through a sunken pipe that extends across the bottom of the Cape Fear River and into the upland CDF. Sediment sampling was performed at the proposed dredge area in November 2019. The results noted wood debris in some of the samples collected. If significant timber debris are encountered, theywill be removed by mechanical means, using either a backhoe or clamshell bucket, to allow for continued hydraulic dredging. The debris will then be placed in a scow and transported to the disposal facility. The dredge material will be discharged at the CDF that will be isolated by an earthen berm. A backhoe will move the pipe/material around as needed within the CDF during dredging. Water pumped with the dredge material will be contained in the placement site until the solids settle out. Once settled, the effluent will drain back to the river in a controlled manner through the weirs. Both the weir elevation and effluent content will be monitored to stay within permitted effluent parameters. Work associated with the proposed project will only take 1 to 2 months. Specifically, the maintenance dredging is expected to take approximately 2 weeks to complete; a turbidity barrier will be implemented around the dredge area (refer to Sheet GN-2 in the design plan National Gypsum Wilminton — Maintenance Dredee -3- Proiect Narrative set). Prior to the maintenance dredging, the pipe will be strung across the bottom of the river, which will take about 2 days. I Some minor grading and maintenance work is anticipated at the CDF to prepare for the disposal of the dredge material; this work is anticipated to take approximately 2 to 4 weeks. Proposed Dredge Material Disposal: National Gypsum intends to dispose of the dredge material at an existing private confined disposal facility located in Brunswick County (Parcel No. 05900006) at approximately 34.176788 N,-77.963510 W, which is across the river from the proposed maintenance dredging area. The dredged material CDF is currently owned by Bate, Land and Timber (BLT) Trust. Urban anticipates that the dredge disposal will be placed on approximately 25 acres of the CDF, primarily in the area previously used for dredge disposal. The dredged material will be confined on high ground to prevent spill -over of solids into any marsh or surrounding waters. The berm height varies between 28 feet above MHW at the inlet (northern) side, to 18 feet above MHW at the outlet (southern) side). Water pumped with the dredged material will be contained in the placement site until the solids settle out. The terminal end of the pipeline will be positioned at least 50 feet from any part of the dike and the distance between this inflow point and the weir spillways will be maximized to allow settlement of suspended solids. During dredging operations, the material inflow point, weir elevation, and CDF grading will be maintained to promote proper drainage. The disposal process will be monitored and the flow rate will be regulated to avoid overtopping of the CDF berms and prevent excessive ponding. The material will be stabilized to keep sediments from entering adjacent waters or wetlands. The effluent will drain back to the river in a controlled manner through the weir. Effluent will be contained in pipes and discharged at a point in the water past visible vegetation and f below the normal high water line to prevent gully erosion and unnecessary siltation. A water control structure will be installed at the intake end of the effluent pipe to assure compliance with water quality standards. Effluent sampling and monitoring will be performed to adhere to water quality standards, including stopping dredging and treating effluent, as needed. During dredging operations, a turbidity curtain will be installed around the outfall of the effluent pipes to further reduce any remaining turbidity. Seasonal restrictions for maintenance dredging will be adhered to as directed by the regulatory agencies. Historic Permits: Permits have been issued for dredging in this area in the past. On August 30,1994/September 14,1994, Permit No.102-94 (Water Quality Certification No. 2668) was issued by the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health & Natural Resources and Coastal Resources Co1innission Division of Coastal Management (DCM) and USACE (Action No.199403672) to dredge the area to -35 MLW via hydraulic dredging. The DCM permit was renewed on February 18,1998 and April 21, 2003 to perform maintenance dredging in this' area. The DCM Permit 102-94 was modified on November 17, 2003 to increase the dredge depth to -44 feet MLW. Wetlands: There are no wetlands in the vicinity of the maintenance dredge area adjacent to National Gypsum's berthing facility. i I Coastal wetlands are present along the area surrounding the proposed disposal area (refer ( to Section 9 for the wetlands report). The dredged material will not be placed within the wetlands; therefore the wetlands around the disposal area will not be permanently National Gypsum Wilmington — Maintenance Dredge -4- Proiect Narrative impacted from the dredge disposal. Minimal temporary impacts to the wetland may occur in order to transport construction equipment to the site and for the dredge material - temporary pipeline placement. Efforts will be made to avoid or minimize temporary wetland impacts to the greatest extent possible by selecting a feasible temporary pipeline and equipment crossing location in an area with the smallest amount of wetlands. If wetlands must be temporarily impacted, timber crane mats will be temporarily placed on the wetlands to allow construction equipment to cross. All temporarily impacted wetlands will be restored to the original condition. Project Proponent Statements The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time. CNorth Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Coastal Management T ` 6L Major permi(AiApplication �Application Fe URBRni CAMA MAJOR PERMIT APPLICATION SECTION 6 - APPLICATION FEE t The application fee for dredging more ,than 1 acre of open water or impacts 150 linear feet or more of a stream is $475. A check (Check No. 914527) for $475 made payable to NCDEQ is enclosed within this section. CNorth Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Coastal Perm Management m MajoritApplication rr Section 7—Deed URBAn■ CAMA MAJOR PERMIT APPLICATION SECTION 7 - DEED The Warranty Deed and Assignment of Lease for the subject property is attached. 100K PAGE 160'1 0011 Gramme's Address Is: Notional Gypsum Company Suite 700 2501 Ceder Springs Road Dallas, Texas 75201.1433 THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA 5 5 COUNTY OF NEW HANOVER 5 Iti t :'.,,L11 ,'.t . . MARY ;..•; 1 r NEGIb IEls IIANOVEII Cu h0 '93 JUL 20 RBI 0 32 KNOW ALLUEN BY71MMPRPSEN S: not on October 28,1990, National Gypsum Company, a Delaware corporation now known as Asbestos Clalms Menagement Corporation C' canto ),Bled hipetition for relief under Title 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the '7Jan IO Code") with the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division (the "QIII N styled In re National Gypsum Company, a Delaware corporation, and Aancor Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Case Nos. 390-37213-SAF-11 and 390-37214-SAF-11 (Jointly Administered); and That on March 9, 1! Amended and Restated Jol Jj qQ and Aancor Holdlnl and all modifications throe approval, approved certai including, without limita6or into between Grantor, as formerly named New NGC corporation; and QrJ That the Assets Pm of the Findings of Fact and Restated Joint Plan of Rea Inc. entered by thus Court 1 That as of the Agreement; and That as of the consummation of the in 13, the Court entered Its order ("DI&t5 confirming the First t Plan of Reorganization of National Gypsum Company ("9Jd , Inc, Chem O. as morlified (as confirmed, together with any is the date hereof, the "Ern"), and, in connection with such documents in implementation and execution of the Plan, an Assets Purchase Agreement (herein so called) to be entered eller, National Gypsum Company, a Delaware corporation Inc. � �, as buyer, and Us Austin Company, an Ohio sae Agreement is attached as' Eddlilt E" to and made a part ondmions of Law on Confirmation of the First Amended and udration of National Gypsum Company and Auncor Holdings, March 9,1993; and Grantor and.Grantee entered Into the Assets Pure(! hereof, Grantor and Grantee commenced timing and in contemplated by the Assets Purchase Agreement. Now, therefore, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN DOII A4S and other valuable consideration to the undersigned paid by Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and pursttent to Sevt on 5.3(c) of the Plan, Section 1.1 of the Ai3ets Purcbase Agreement, and paragraph 6(a) of the Order, Grantor has GRANTED, SOLD, ASSIGNED, and CONVEYED, and by these presents does GRANT, SELL, ASSIGN, :tad CONVEY, without warranty (express or Implied) except as expressly set forth below and subject to the. Nailed to: Chioago Title Insurance Cecq:-,y 8roenag oggHe 27401 160'I 0012 Remaining liens (as hereinafter defined), unto Grantee, f U all Ilia[ certain property situated in New Hanover County, North Carolina, and more fully described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes, and jg) all of Grumor's right, title nod interest in, to and under that certain lease dated September 26, 1980, as amended June 17, 1986, (the "J="), covering certain property more particularly described therein, by and between Grantor, as tenant, and Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company, a Virginia corporation, as landlord, a copy of which Is attached hereto as Exhibit B and made a part hereof for all purposes, the leasehold estate created by the Unit (the "j r. se RI his") and the leasehold improvements located in or on the leasehold estate; together with M all buildings, structures, fixtures, and improvements located on the property described herein, j,U any and all interests of Grantor in adjacent tracts of land, and &I all interest, if any, of Grantor in strips or gores between the property described herein and abutting properties and any land lying in or under the bed of any street, alley, road, or right-of-way, opened or proposed, abutting or adjacent to the property described herein, rights, easements, and other interests appurtenant thereto, and the matters described on Exhibit C attached hereto and made a pan hereof for all purposes (collectively, the "EwV=&),.and the conveyance of the Property hereby is being effected jjl free and clear of JW any mortgage, lien, pledge, charge, security Interest, encumbrance, or other securitydeviee(collectively,"{,1oJ ),Many right of payment, or any right to an equitable remedy for breach of performance if such breach gives rise to a right of payment, from either Old NGC or Annear, in either case whether such right is reduced to judgment, fixed, contingent, matured, unmatured, disputed, undisputed, secured, or unsecured (collectively, "Qftjm"), Q any equity interest in Old NGC or Aancor represented by the common stock of Old NGC or Aancor, and JW liabilities, duties, obligations, options, charges, Hens, security interests, infringements, and other burdens, encumbrances and interests thereon or thereagainst of whatever type or description, including those of the Y.ind specified in sections 502(g), (h), and (I) of the Bankruptcy Code, and preferential tights or rights of first refusal of any kind or nature whatsoever, whether direct or indirect, absolute or contingent, matured or unmatured, liquidated or unliquldated, of, by, or against Grantor or the Property (items gated in clauses LM through M are herein sometimes referred to collectively as the "EneUmhrMUC), other [ban such Encumbrances to the extent affecting the Property and not otherwise resolved, released, avoided, or otherwise terminated pursuant to the Plan or by [-trial Order (as defined in the Plan) of the Court, including, without limitation, liens on the Property securing Secured Claims (as defined in the Plan) (collectively,'$r,)nglejnJ1lz ). and M with respect to contracts or leases assigned or transferred hereby, notwithstanding a provision In any contract or lease (including, without limitation, mineral and gypsum deposit leases) or any applicable law that piribibits, restricts or conditions the assignment or transfer of that contract or lease, including all preferential rights or lights of first refusal of any 1.. or nature whatsoever, pursuant to section 365(f) of the Bankruptcy Code (arovided• that such prohibition, restriction or condition of assignment or transfer shall be negated only with respect to transfers and aisigtunents effected pursuant hereby or pursuant to the Assets Purchase Agreement and tho other Plan Documents (as defined in the Plan) as contemplated by the Plan, and that such prohibitions, restrictions and conditions of assignment shall otherwise remain in full force and effect and a part of the contract or lease so assigned or transferred); provided, however, that the conveyance orthe Property effected I , 100K PACE 160H 0013 hereby specifically Is toads without eqy representallons or warranties to Grantee as W Grantor's righls,lltle, or Interests In or to 1hOroperty, except to the extent expressly Be, forth berelnabove, and subject to such further disclaimers of warranties canmined in Sections 4.1(a) and 4.1(b) of the Assets Purchase Agreement, which are incorporated by reference hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes, but with full substitution and subrogation or Grantee In and to all rights and actions of warranty that Grantor may have against all persons other than Austin or Its subsidiaries, the NGC Asbestos Settlement Fund, the Asbestos Committee, or the Legal Representative (each as deflued In the Plan); and provided, rrther, however, that nothing contained herein shall be deemed a welver of the rejection of any unexpired lease or executory contract pursuant to the Plan or an assumption of amrmatlon by Grantee of soy such unexpired lease or ezeeutory contract rejected pursuant to the Plan. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Property, together with all and singular the rights and appurtenances thereunto in anywise belonging unto Grantee, Its successors and assigns forever, or, in the case of the Lease Rights and such leasehold estate, for and during the remainder of the term mentioned in the Lease and any extensions or renewals thereof; and r Grantor does hereby bind itself, Its successors and assigns to WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND, all and singular the Property unto Grantee, its successors and assigns, against every person whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim the same or any pan, thereof; provided, however, that, notwithstanding the foregoing, any claim, cause of action, or demand with respect to any rights, title, or interests in or to the Property, including, without limitation, any claim, cause of action, or demand for failure to deliver the Property Gee and S clear of all Encumbrances other than RemaWng Llens, as well as any representations. or warranties of Grantor with respect to the, Property, shall be limited as provided in .' Section 4.1(c) and 4.2 of the Assets Purchase Agreement za . Notwithstanding any other provision of this Deed, the rights and remedies of Gra nice are limited in accordance with Sections 43(c) and Section 4.2 of the Assets Purchase Agreement, which Sections arc incorporated by referruce herein and made a part hereof for i all purposes. The Lease has been assumed and assigned pursuant to section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code. Pursuant to Section 21(a)(ii) of the Assets Purchase Agreement, Grantee has assumed ag obligations of Grantor under the Lease effective as of the effective date of this .r .; Deed. r• The undertakings, covenants and agreements contained herein shall be binding upon, and Inure to the benefit of, the parties hereto, and their respective successors, assigns and y. legal representatives. 3 i, In witness whereof, Grantor has caused this instrument to be 'signed ut its nnuse by Its duly authorized officers and its seal m be hercunar affixed by anthnrry "d ar' Board of Director , this fyl day of may._. 1993 to be effective as r,l tic day of 1993. Ganrrroa: tr t{(�1r�r'ale . Scall ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEML•N'f CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation formerly named YAP Y ,, .,. National Gypsum Company r�y'g:• 'i:ripe• odf : Name: Title: %Arp President STATE OF TEXAS 5 S COUNTY OF DALLAS S I, a Notary Public of the County and State aforesaid, certify that A 110 personally came before me this day and acknowledged that _ he is T%r reS;a eSeeraary of Asbestos Claims Management Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and that by authority duly given and as the act of the corporation, the foregoing Instrument was si e,�7t�� I its name b Its V; ce President, sealed with its corporate seal and attested t, I(P cc,% O. Nonsb j es ib ��/'•rANrsecreta. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this Is_ day of � ��sr 19Dj t �5 >rggry;, .n hUn nL L -A. �Unt 1 r.{,ri341"i.��w4 My commission expires: to - i 1-9 G. Thh era f Z V dq W..j 197L Mursoe Ooa, of1� ......... .... ........... .. . . CNorth Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I �.L Division of CoastalManagement Major Permit Application CESeelion 8 —Agent Authorization Form URBRni CAMA MAJOR PERMIT APPLICATION SECTION 8 - AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM Urban Engineers Inc. has been authorized to act as the agent for the applicant (National Gypsum Company). Therefore, the completed Agent Authorization Form is attached. AGENT AUTHORIZATION FOR CAMA PERMIT APPLICATION Name of Property Owner Requesting Permit: National Gypsum Company Mailing Address: 2001 Rexford Road Phone Number: Charlotte, NC 28211 704-365-7316 Email Address: National Gypsum Company I certify that I have authorized Urban Engineers, Inc. (Jennifer L. Waters) , Agent / Contractor to act on my behalf, for the purpose of applying for and obtaining all CAMA permits necessary for the following proposed development: Maintenance Dredging at National Gypsum Wilmington at my property located at 838 Sunnyvale Drive, Wilmington, NC 28412 r" in New Hanover County. i furthermore certify that i am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to Division of Coastal Management staff, the Local Permit Officer and their agents to enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application. Property Owner Information: Signature Meahan Zehrinaer I Print or Type Name Engineering Project Manager Title d 2 1 t7 6 / 2mz® Date This certification is valid through 05 j / 30 1 2030 �� I CNorth QDivision Carolina Department of Environmental Quality of Coastal Management Major Permit Application L\i Section 9—Wetlands / � uReAn■ CAMA MAJOR PERMIT APPLICATION SECTION 9 - WETLAND DELINEATION The proposed maintenance dredging area consists of open water adjacent to National Gypsum's berth, therefore no wetlands are located within the proposed dredge area. A wetland delineation was performed in 2009 and 2020 at the confined disposal facility (CDF) where National Gypsum will dispose of the dredge material. The US Army Corps of Engineers and NC CAMA performed the Jurisdictional Determination (JD) field visit on September 9, 2020 to verify the wetland delineation performed by SandEC in 2020. Although the JD has not been issued yet, an email summary from the JD site visit is included in this section indicating that the USACE and CAMA have agreed to the line/limits of their jurisdiction being demarcated on the attached 2020 wetland delineation map. The wetlands delineation report from 2020 is attached and the wetland map and JD prepared as part of the 2009 delineation is also attached. Coastal wetlands were identified along the area surrounding the proposed disposal area; however wetlands are not located in the area where the dredge material will be stored. The dredged material will not be placed within the wetlands; therefore the wetlands around the disposal area will not be permanently impacted. Efforts will be made to avoid or minimize temporary wetland impacts to the greatest extent possible by selecting a feasible temporary pipeline and equipment crossing location in an area with no delineated wetlands (refer to Plan GA-3 in Section 4). No wetlands are anticipated to be temporarily or permanently impacted. Timber crane mats will be temporarily placed in the location where the pipe will be placed to allow construction equipment to cross. If any wetlands will be temporarily impacted, they will be restored to the original condition. Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 8412 FAs of Neuse Road, Suite 104, R+leigh, NC 27615 • Phoue: (919) 846-5900 • Fax: (919) 846-9467 smdec.com March 9, 2020 S&EC Project No.: 13870.W6 To: Urban Engineers, Inc. Attn: Jennifer Waters 530 Walnut St. Philadelphia, PA 19106 Re: Wetland Delineation and Stream Evaluation National Gypsum Site (Dredge Disposal Area) Wilmington, NC Ms. Waters: On February 26, 2020, S&EC personnel completed the wetland delineation and stream evaluation on the National Gypsum Property (Dredge Disposal Area) in Wilmington, NC. You will find the attached report detailing our findings. Maps that further document the wetland and stream related site characteristics are also attached. • The next step in the wetland and stream verification process is to visit the site with the Army Corps of Engineers' agent for Brunswick County, as well as a representative from DCM to review the potential CAMA wetlands onsite. S&EC will schedule this site visit at your request. As you move forward in planning your development, S&EC personnel are available for site plan review and permit consultation services. Please contact S&EC if you have any questions related to wetland and stream regulations or if you need clarification of the attached report. Sincerely, SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA Steven Ball, RF, PWS Project Manager Attachments: 1) Wetland Delineation Report 2) USGS site vicinity map 3) NRCS Soil Survey 4) Wetland & Stream Sketch,Map 5) Agent Authorization Form 11 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 8412 Falls of Neuse Road, suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: (919) 846-5900 • Fax: (919) 846-9467 sandec.com DETAILED WETLAND DELINEATION FOR THE NATIONAL GYPSUM SITE (DREDGE DISPOSAL AREA On FEBRUARY 269 2020,,S&EC personnel completed a detailed wetland delineation and stream evaluation on the National Gypsum Site (Dredge Disposal Area) (140 acres). The site is located on an island directly across the Cape Fear River to the west from 838 Sunnyvale Dr, Wilmington, NC 28412. Figure 1 and Figure 2 show the location of the site on a USGS topographic quadrangle and NRCS County Soil Survey, respectively. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY We have determined that wetlands generally account for the jurisdictional waters observed on the site. The attached wetland sketch map depicts the approximate locations of streams and wetlands identified during our evaluation. P lease refer to the sketch map and the results and recommendations section below for more detailed information. The detailed wetland delineation consisted bf traversing the property to examine soils, vegetation, and hydrology across the site in'search of areas that meet the criteria for jurisdictional wetlands as described by the procedures set forth in the Corns of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (January 1987 — Final Report) and.Re inal Supplement (Version 2.0). Areas on the site with positive indicators of hydric soils, evidence of wetland hydrology, and presence of hydrophytic vegetation were flagged with sequentially numbered, orange S&EC logo flagging. Proof of wetland hydrology would be the existence of hydric soils with oxidized root channels in the upper 12 inches of the soil profile, water borne deposits, drift lines, scour marks, drainage patterns, regional indicators of soil saturation, etc. Surface waters such as intermittent and peremlial stream channels, ponds, and lakes, which are also subject to regulation by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) as waters of the US, were also identified. These surface waters may also be referred to as jurisdictional waters to indicate that they are within the jurisdiction of the USACE. It is important ito note that wetlands are also classified as waters of the US and regulated by the USACE underlauthority of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). RESULTS & RECOlIIDIENDATIONS I The results of the detailed wetland delineation and stream evaluation are discussed below. Wetlands and Jurisdictional Waters: We have determined that jurisdictional waters (i.e., wetlands) exist on the site. Please refer to the attached "Wetland Sketch Map" for sp�cific flag numbers and approximate locations. S&EJ Project #: 13870. W6 March 9, 2020 March 9, 2020 S&EC Project #: 13870.W6 Page 2 of 3 Surface waters on this site flow into the Cape Fear River in which has been classified in "Classification and NC DWQ Standards Applicable to Surface Waters and Wetlands of North Carolina" as SC. Section 404 and CAMA Wetlands The wetlands onsite were identified as being, a Estuarine Woody Welland and Salt/Brackish Marsh (CAMA) type as outlined in the publication I"NCWAM Manual." This wetland type is common throughout the estuaries and coastal rivers in North Carolina that contain tidal influence. Please note that there are likely CAMA (Coastal Area Management Act) wetlands onsite that are approximately shown on the attached sketch. A representative from CAMA/DCM will need to confirm these wetlands. The site is also likely located within the "Areas of Environmental Concern" (AEC) as designated by the Coastal Resources Commission. This site will likely contain a 75' buffer from the Normal High -Water Line of the Cape Fear River (Public Trust Waters). All S&EC flags comprising the wetland and jurisdictional waters delineation should be surveyed for use in site planning and USACE approval and permitting. Please have the property owner or contracting buyer complete the attached agent authorization form ifyou would like S&EC to act on their behalf for requesting approval of the wetland delineation. This form will also be used in preparing a permit application for impacts to wetlands or surface waters when we are provided with a plan showing the proposed impacts. S&EC cannot conduct correspondence with the USACE unless we have agent authorization (see attached Agent Authorization). This authorization form must be filled out in its entirety and returned to S&EC (a faxed copy is acceptable). Regulations . A general list of regulations that apply to jurisdictional wetlands and waters present on the site are discussed below. Please be aware that other local, state, and federal regulations not included in this list may also apply. S&EC personnel are available to discuss these regulations as they apply to your project. 6l edand Perinitting: The current Nationwide Permits were issued by the USACE on March 18, 2017. The USACE Wilmington District issued revised Regional Conditions for the 2017 Nationwide Permits. We recommend you forward a conceptual site plan to our office for review by one of our permitting specialists, who can best advise you of the specific permitting needs as you progress through the planning process. "'North Carolina Wetland Assessment Method. March 9, 2020 S&EC Project H: 13870.W6 Page 3 of 3 Generally, wetland impact permits are issued on a per -project basis as determined by the USACE. The USACE has determined that impacts on parcels sub -divided from larger tracts are sometimes considered to be cumulative to existing impacts for the large tract. If this is the case, then thresholds for notification may not apply to your project and impacts to streamshvetlands must be considered in light of existing pen -nits. Limitations Our evaluations, conclusions, and recommendations are based on project and site information available to us at the time of this report and may require modification if there are any changes in the project or site conditions, or if additional data about the project or site becomes available in the future. This report is intended for use by Urban Engineers on this project. These findings are not intended or recommended to be suitable for reuse on extensions of the project or on any other project. Reuse on extensions of this project or on any other project shall be done only after written verification or adaptation by SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA, for the specific purpose intended. CONCLUSION The wetland and stream delineation for the National Gypsum Site (Dredge Disposal Area) was completed by S&EC on February 26, 2020. This site contains jurisdictional streams and wetland areas that may require preconstruction authorization for impacts, depending on the size and nature of the impact (i.e. road construction, lot fill, stormwater.pond construction, etc.). USACE and CAMA (DCM) verification of our site assessment should be obtained. Following verification meetings with regulatory agencies, the next step in the stream and wetland identification and permitting process is to obtain a field survey of our delineation for formal approval by the USACE. Upon completing the survey, these site constraints may then be integrated into planning for property development. kLL -92 -i4- 4- !-I-? Project Number: 13870.W6 I ff = 1000' 03/0912020 Figure 1 - USES Map National Gypsum (Dredge Disposal Area) New Hanover County, NC Source: 2019 NC Wilmington Quad 11 Fourf Jetty. Upper Bru? ' ISI RMW'd 0 1,000 2,000 000 N Feet Soil & ]Environmental Consultants, PA 841 ^_ Falls of Ncuse Rood, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone (919) 846-5900 • Pox: (9l9) 846.9467 ovsdcc.com PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION / AGENT AUTHORIZATION Project Name/Description: /U111% t 6i a 4,/ } A-% S&EC Project #13_g7o Date: Zo The Department of the Army U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District 69 Darlington Avenue Wilmington, NC 28403 Attn: drArk,`Ps n@(Field Office: A) t tit 5 f In I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do authorize representatives of the lWilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) staff, as my agent, to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section I1I10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. This document also authorizes S&EC, as my agent, to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance andl acceptance of a permit or certification and any and all associated standard and special conditions.This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project. NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC to arrange a site meeting prior to visiting the site. PARCEL INFORMATION: Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 310500954842 Site Address: 1211AC Plat 15132 City, County, State: South Leland, Brunswick County, NC PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: Name: BLT Trust Mailing Address: 131 Ocean Blvd. W, Supply, NC 28462 Telephone Number: (please print) d Date 7' :;gs PAOr Pro erty Owner Signature o11.5 I Phone..: ffla �70—j9 �lu���raiit��fr/la l 1, ean'� We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to J the best of our knowledge. J._ U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710.xxxx, Exp: Pending WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET —Atlantic an6 Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT: See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R I (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) 'roject/Site: National Gypsum (Disposal Area) City/County: Wilmington/Brunswick Sampling Dale: 02/26/2020 Applicant/Owner: BLT Trust (Mark Sanders) State: NC Sampling Point: DP1 Investigalor(s): S&EC - Steven Ball & Joshua Harvey Section, Township, Range: NA Landfonn (hillside, terrace, etc.): none Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T, MLRA 153A Let: 34.176772 ' Long:-77.962325 Datum: NAD 1983 Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: PEM5Rd Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology _ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No — Are Vegetation _, Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hyddc Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Remarks: HYDROLOGY Yes X No _ Is the Sampled Area Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No Yes X No I Welland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Irimary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) __Surface Water (Al) _Aquatic Fauna (E 13) _ _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) X High Water Table (A2) Mad Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10) _ x Saturation (A3) Sulfide Odor (Ct) Trim Lines (B16) _Hydrogen _Water Marks (Bt) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _Moss _Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows (C8) —Presence Deposits (B3) Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _Drift _Recent Mat or Crust (B4) Muck Surf dlce (C7) _Saturation x Geomorphic Position (D2) _Algal _Thin _Iron Deposits (B5) _Other (Explain in Remarks) _Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I X FAC-Neutral Test (05) x Water -Stained Leaves (89) _Sphagnum Moss (Di (LRR T, U) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes_ No x Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes x No Depth Sinches): 0 Saturation Present? Yes x No_ Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No_ (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: i Remarks: I ENG FORM 6116.2SG, JUL 2018 Auannc ana jmt coastai viam — version z.0 I VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'r ) % Cover Species? Status 1. Ulmus americana 10 Yes FAC 2. Chamaecypads thyoides 10 Yes OBL 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 20 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'r ) 1. Morella cenfera 20 Yes FAC 2. Ligustrum sinense 10 Yes FAC 3. Quemus virginiana 20 Yes FACU 4. 5. 6. 7. e. 50 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover: Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'r ) 1. Scirpus cernuus 30 Yes 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. if. 12. 30 =ITotal Cover 50% of total cover: 15 20% bf total cover: Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'r ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. -Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.) 10 OBL 6 Sampling Point: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 6 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83.3% (A/B) Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species 40 x 1 = 40 FACW species 0 x 2 = 0 FAC species 40 x 3 = 120 FACU species 20 x 4 = 80 UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 Column Totals: 100 (A) 240 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.40 _ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% X 3 -Prevalence Index is 53.0' Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must bE present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. ITS cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DISH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub- Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb -AII herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody Vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No_ ENG FORM 6116.2SG, JUL 2018 1 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DPI Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks OA 10YR 2/1 100 Sandy 4-16 10YR 3/2 90 10YR 4/6 10 C M Sandy Prominent redox concentrations Lion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) _ Histosol (Al) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _Histic Epipedon (A2) Barrier Islands licm Muck (S12) —Black Histic (A3) (MLRA 1538, 1153D) _Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _Stratified Layers (A5) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _Organic Bodies (AS) (LRR P, T, U) _Depleted Matrix �(F3) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Redox Dark Surface (176) Presence (A8) (LRR U) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) —Muck _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _ _Redox Depressions (F8) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) _Marl (F10) (LRRI U) Dark Surface (Al2) Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) _Thick '- —Coast Prairie Redox (Al6) (MLRA 150A)_ _Depleted Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, 1) i _Sandy Mucky Mineral (St) (LRR O, S) _Umbric Surface.(F13) (LRR P, T, U) - Gleyed Matrix (S4) Ochdc (F17) (MLRA 151) —Sandy X Sandy Redox(S5) _Delta _Reduced Vertic'(F18)(MLRA 150A, 150B) —Stripped Matrix (S6) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) _Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) _Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 149A; 153C, 153D) _ (LRR S, T, U) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (1722) (MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) _2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) _Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (outside MLRA 150A) _Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, 150B) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T) _Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20) (MLRA 153S) _Red Parent Material (F21) —Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) (outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154) Bonier Islands Low Chrome Matrix (TS7) (MLRA 153B, 153D) Other (Explain in Remarks) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ENG FORM 6116.2.SG, JUL 2018 1 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT. See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) ;Iroject/Site: National Gypsum (Disposal Area) City/County: Wilmington/Brunswick Sampling Date: 02/26/2020 Applicant/Owner: BLT Trust (Mark Sanders) State: NC Sampling Point: DP2 Investigator(s): S&EC - Steven Ball & Joshua Harvey Section, Township, Range: NA Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): none Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T, MLRA 153A Lat: 34.175139 Long:-77.963119 Datum: NAD 1983 Soil Map Unit Name: NIA NWI classification: PSS1Sd t1F Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year.? Yes x No_ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation—, Soil or Hydrology _significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No Are Vegetation _, Soil _, or Hydrology _naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Remarks: I: PA h1:7611r§Tel I Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Yes_ No X within a Wetland? Yes_ No X Yes No X Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) `Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Water (All Fauna (813) Vegetated Concave Surface (138) _Surface _Aquatic Water Table (A2) Deposits (B15) (LRR U) _Sparsely _Drainage Patterns (1310) _High _Marl _Saturation (A3) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _Moss Trim Lines (B16) _ Water Marks (Bt) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Deposits (62) of Reduced Iron (C4) Burrows (C8) _Sediment _Presence Drift Deposits (133) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) I _Crayfish _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Thin Muck Surface (07) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _Iron Deposits (85) _Other (Explain in Remarks) _Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ FAC-Neutral Test (135) —Water—Stained Leaves (139) _ Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U) Field Observations: i Surface Water Present? Yes_ No x Depth (inches): Wafer Table Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): _ Saturation Present? Yes_ No x Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes_ No_ (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: ENG FORM 6116.2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf coastal Plain — Version z.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP2 Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'r ) % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: 1. Populus deltoides 30 Yes FAC Number of Dominant Species 2. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A) 3. Total Number of Dominant 4. Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) 5. Percent of Dominant Species 6. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B) 7. Prevalence Index worksheet: 8. Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 30 =Total Cover OBL species 20 x 1 = 20 50% of total cover. 15 20% of total cover: 6 FACW species 0 x 2 = 0 Saolino/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'r ) FAC species 70 x 3 = 210 1. Populus deltoides 30 Yes FAC FACU species 0 x 4 = 0 2. Chamaecyparis thyoides 20 Yes OBL UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 3. Column Totals: 90 (A) 230 (B) 4. Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.56 5. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 6. _ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 7. X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 8. 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0' 50 =Total Cover _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover: 10 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'r ) 1. Andropogon virginicus 10 Yes FAC 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be t�� ? present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: F 3. 4. Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 5. more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 6. height. 7. SaplinglShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less 8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 It (1 m) tall. 9. 10. Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless 11 of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 12. 10 =Total Cover Woody Vine -AII woody vines greater than 3.28 It in 50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2 height. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'r ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Hydrophytic =Totall Cover Vegetation 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover. Present? Yes X No - Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.) ' I ENG FORM 6116-2SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain -Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks 0-16 2.5Y 6/4 100 RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Sandy Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) _Histosol (Al) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12) —Black Histic (A3) (MLRA 153B, 153D) —Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) -Loamy Mucky Miineral (F1) (LRR O) _Stratified Layers (A5) -Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _Organic Bodies (AS) (LRR P, T, U) _Depleted Matrix SF3) cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Redox Dark Surface (F6) _5 Presence (AS) (LRR U) _ Dark Surface (F7) _Muck 1 cm Muck (Ag) (LRR P, n _Depleted Redox Depressions (F8) _ —Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) _ —Mad (F10) (LRRIU) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Depleted Ochric i(F11)(MLRA 151) /- "'__ Coast Pmirie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) _Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) Umbric Sur f F13) (LRR P, T, U) ' _Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox _ Delta Ochric (1717) (MLRA 151) Reduced Vedic 1F18) 150A, 150B) _Sandy (S5) Matrix (S6) _ (MLRA Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) _Stripped Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) _Piedmont Bright Floodplain Soils (F20) —Dark _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) _Anomalous (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) (LRR S, T, U) —Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) (MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (Inches): 'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) _2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR S) Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6) (outside MLRA 150A) _Reduced Vertic (Fl8) (outside MLRA 150A, 150B) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T) _Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B) _Red Parent Material (F21) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) (outside MLRA138, 152A In FL, 154) Barrier Islands Low Chrome Matrix (TS7) (MLRA 153B, 153D) Other (Explain in Remarks) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X ENG FORM 6116.2SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0 Page 1 of 11 Jennifer Waters - RE: [External] Re: 2026-00691: National Gypsum/Cape Fear River Disposal Area, Brunswick Co From: Steven Ball <sball@sandec.com> To: 'Beecher, Gary H CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)" <Gary.H.Beecher@usace.army.mil>... Date: 9/21/2020 3:50 PM Subject: RE: [External] Re: 2020-00691: National Gypsum/Cape Fear River Disposal Area, Brunswick Co Cc: Jennifer Waters <jlwaters@urbanengineers.com>, Peter Brennan <pbrennan@u... Attachments: VW-051400015_S&EC_National Gypsum Dredge Area - mGYPSUM_prelim.pdf; Wetland Map 2020 (w photo coments).pdf All, Per our site visit from September 9th, there were no changes to the delineation around the perimeter of the spoil island. Apologies for the delay in sending this out. The USACE and CAMA have agreed to the line/limits of their jurisdiction being the demarcated S&EC line in the attached wetland sketch. The attached line could be considered the CAMA line and can be regulated as such. Also attached is a DRAFT PDF survey of the flags around the perimeter from McKim and Creed. Please let me know if you have any questions or require any additional info. Gary, let me know when you think you could issue the 1D on this site. Thanks for everyone's help. Steven Steven Ball, RF, PWS NC Registered Forester #1723 Professional Wetland Scientist #2732 Soil and Environmental Consultants, PA 8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104 Raleigh, NC 27615 Mobile-919-691-2114 Office-919-846-5900 Visit us at Sandec.com From: Beecher, Gary H CIV USARMY CESAW (,SA) <Gary.H.Beecher@usace.army.mil> Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 9:05 AM To: Steven Ball <sball@sandec.com>; Dail, Jason <jason.dail@ncdenr.gov>; David Jones <DJones@mckimcreed.com>; MacPherson, Tara <tara.macpherson@ncdenr.gov>; Noelle Lutheran <nlutheran@gmail.com> Cc: Jennifer Waters <jlwaters@urbanengineers.com>; Peter Brennan <pbrennan@urbanengineers.com>; Elks, Katharine B <katharine.elks@ncdenr.govi> Subject: RE: [External] Re: 2020-00691: National Gypsum/Cape Fear River Disposal Area, Brunswick Co file:///C:/Users/jlwaters/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwise/5F68CBBDurbanO l urban-hql ... 10/22/2020 TNorth Carolina Department of Environmental Quality a: Division of Coastal Management m Major Permit Application Section 10—Adjacenl Properly Owner Notification L\i� uRean■ CAMA MAJOR PERMIT APPLICATION SECTION 10 - ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER NOTICE Certified letters with copies of the application package (application forms, project narrative, and site drawings/maps) were sent to all adjacent property owners to National Gypsum Parcel R06400-001- 002-OOB in New Hanover County and the private confined disposal facility Parcel 05900006 in Brunswick County. This notification also included instructions to the adjacent property owner that any objections or concerns they have about the proposed development. The signed certified return mail receipts are included in this section. i The adjacent property owners to the pri posed dredging area are: 1. Kinder Morgan Terminals Wilmington LLC 3340 River Road Wilmington, NC 28412 Parcel ID: R06400-001- 2. Port Cape Fear Associates, 3410 River Road Wilmington, NC 28412 Parcel ID: R06400-001-02, x Ir M1 S In Rd ..0 rR O O O O ru U7 a Ln a M M1 m •. ru . . . r` (II�ili�91 �l 4�2 L �m 0 Lo FBslago' w CeNlled Fee'. $Q • (ltl '.+, - G - O Return Roralpl Fee,f/ (Endowment RogNmtl) ^�?/ `tidal - C3 'RBlitdclodDelivery Pon ("doisoment RagUhadrn .A TolelPostage&Feea''$Qb/3i tU $ B'o om emse< Icay" rS"No.rPOeoxNo.M1 S(BfB. YIRtd I USPS.com®- USPS Tracking®Results USPS Tracking® Track Another Package + Tracking Number: 70151520000162547396 FAQs > Remove X Your item has been delivered to an agent forifinal delivery in WILMINGTON, NC 28412 on June 29, 2020 at 11:15 am. G Delivered to Agent June 29, 2020 at 11:15 am Delivered to Agent for Final Delivery WILMINGTON, NC 28412 Get Updates v Text & Email Updates u I Tracking History v Product Information u See Less ^ Can't find what you're looking for? Go to our FAQs section to find answers to your tracking questions. httpsJ/tools.usps.comfgorrmckConfirmActlon?tRef=fullpage&tLc=2&text28777=&tLabels=70151520000162547396%2C 112 '11/30/2020 USPS.com®- USPS Tracking® Results USPS Tracking® Track Another Package + FAQs Tracking Number: 70132630000095007238 Remove X Your item has been delivered to an agent forifinal delivery in WILMINGTON, NC 28412 on June 29, 2020 at 11:18 am. G Delivered to Agent CD CD June 29, 2020 at 11:18 am o- v Delivered to Agent for Final Delivery IN WILMINGTON, NC 28412 'c Get Updates \/ Text & Email Updates j v Tracking History u Product Information Less /\ Can't find what you're looking for? Go to our FAQs section to find answers to your tracking questions. v https:/(tools.usps.com/gorFmckConfimAction?tRef=fullpage&tLc=2&text28777=&tLabels=70132630000095007238%2C 1/2 .. 5'so to x+.t Stroet P;J)Ddel I u PA 19i06 ANGINEERS June 25, 2020 Return Receipt Requested Port Cape Fear Associates, LLC 3410 River Road Wilmington, NC 28412 Dear Sir or Madam: National Gypsum Company is applying) for a CAMA Major Permit to perform maintenance dredging at their shipping berth located in the Cape Fear River, adjacent to 838 Sunnyvale Drive in Wilmington, New Hanover County, North' Carolina. The specifics of the proposed work are in the enclosed application forms and drawings. As the adjacent riparian property owner tq the aforementioned project, I am required to notify you of the project in order to give you the opportunity to comment on the project. Please review the attached permit application and drawings Please then indicate if you have any objections to this proposal on the attached Adjacent Riparian Property Owner Statement and complete the bottom of the form. Should you have any objections to this proposal, please send your written comments to Tara MacPherson, North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Coastal Management, 127 Cardinal Drive Ext., Wilmington, NC 28405-3845 within 30 days of your receipt of this notice. Such comments will be considered by the Department in reaching a final decision on the application. No comment within 30 days of your receipt of this notice will be considered as no objection. If you have any questions on this project, please call me at 215-284- 3125, or e-mail me at jlwaters ,urbanengineers.com. Very truly yours, URBAN ENGINEERS, INC. /*_�_ &)L&' Jennifer L. Waters, P.E. Permit Coordinator Enclosures CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER STATEMENT I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to National Gypsum Company ,s 838 Sunn (Name of Property Owner) property located at yvale Drive, Wilmin ton, NC 28412 (Address, Lot, Block, Road, etc.) on Cape Fear River in Wilmington, New Hanover N.C. (Waterbody) (CitylTown and/or County) The applicant has described to me, as shown below, the development proposed at the above location. I have no objection to this proposal. I have objections to this proposal. Project description and site drawing are attached. If you have objections to what is proposed, you must notify the Division of Coastal Management (DCM) in writing within 10 days of receipt of this notice. Contact information for DCM office is available at http://www.nccoastalmanagement.net/web/cm/staff-listing or by calling 1-888-4RCOAST. No response is considered the same as no objection if you have been notified by Certified Mail. WAIVER SECTION I understand that a pier, dock, mooring pilings, boat ramp, breakwater, boathouse, lift, or groin must be set back a minimum distance of 15' from my area of riparian access unless waived by me. (If you wish to waive the setback, you 'Must initial the appropriate blank below.) I do wish to waive the 15' setback requirement. This Section is not applicable. I do not wish to waive the 15' setback requirement. (Property Owner Information) UU` re Meghan Zehringer Print or Type Name 9n01 Rexford Rnad Mailing Address Charlotte. NC 28211 City/State2ip 704-3615a300 Telephone Number/email address aZ.IVNZ0 (Adjacent Property Owner Information) Signature* Print or Type Name Mailing Address City/State2ip Telephone Number/email address Date Dale* 'Valid for one calendar year after signature* (Revised Aug. 2014) National Gypsum Wilmington — Maintenance Dredge -I- PJect Narrative l Project Narrative National Gypsum Wilmington — Maintenance Dredging Project Name: National Gypsum Wilmington Maintenance Dredging Project Description: The proposed project includes maintenance dredging at National Gypsum's Wilmington commercial berth facility to a depth of -36' MLW (^-12,000 cubic yards of material) and -2 feet overdredge (-5,000 cubic yards of material) in order to continue National Gypsum's operations at their Wilmington Facility. This project consists of dredging approximately 17,000 cubic yards of silt, clay, and sand from the navigable waters of the United States. The dredge quantities were calculated based on the latest sounding). The dredge material is anticipated be disposed at a private confined disposal facility (CDF) located in Brunswick County (Parcel No. 05900006) at approximately 34.176788 N,-77.963510 W, which' is directly across the river from the proposed maintenance dredging area. This project is considered maintenance dredging since the berthing area was dredged in the past. No portion of this maintenance dredging project has been completed yet. Owner's Contact Ms. Meghan Zehringer Engineering Project Manager Waterways National Gypsum Company 2001 Rexford Road Charlotte, NC 28211 (704) 365-7268 (phone) (704) 365-7316 (fax) Where: National Gypsum Company 838 Sunnyvale Drive Wilmington, NC 28412 Wilmington facility in order for Natioi This area has not been dredged sin( significant need to deepen the berth accommodate the ships required for I berthing area is not dredged, this will Gypsum and ultimately impact the loi occur in the late fall/early winter of 24 use of the site. Engineer's Contact Mr. Peter Brennan, PE Deputy Practice Leader, Ports & Urban Engineers, Inc. 530 Walnut Street, 14th Floor Philadelphia, PA igio6-3586 (215) 922-8080 (phone) (215) 922-8082 (fax) :e dredging is imperative at the National Gypsum Gypsum to continue their operations in this region. at least the early 2000s and therefore there is a area to ensure the safe passage of ships and to clonal Gypsum to receive gypsum shipments. If the ad to significant financial implications for National economy. The proposed dredging is anticipated to D/2021. The proposed dredging will not change the Site Background and Current Conditions: The proposed approximately 2.o-acre maintenance dredging area is owned by National Gypsum Company (NGC) and is located in the Cape Fear River (Stream Classification "SC") at approximately Lat: 34.17375 N, Long: - 75.957511 W in New Hanover County.IThe area to be dredged is National Gypsum's berth in the Cape Fear River. The Cape Fear River bottom material in the vicinity of the proposed maintenance dredging area is composed of silt, clay, sand and some wood debris, per the sediment sampling in November 20i9. The project area is located in open water with depths ranging from approximately -12 MLW to -37 MLW. Due to past maintenance dredging and National Gypsum Wilmington — Maintenance Dredge -2- Proiect Narrative past frequent use of the area by large ships, submerged vegetation is not located within the project area. National Gypsum Company uses the facility for unloading gypsum for wallboard production at the wallboard plant across River Road. The manufacturing facilities are located on the east side of SR iioo with a conveyor belt crossing the highway to the property on the west side. The conveyor continues along a pier extending into Cape Fear River terminating on the shipping berth. There is a paved access way from SR iioo to the river. The existing berthing facility extends approximately 1,68o feet into the Cape Fear River, with a dock extending approximately 195 feet to the north of the pier. The National Gypsum Wilmington facility was constructed in 1975, at which time the river adjacent to the berth was dredged to a depth of 35 feet MLW. Maintenance dredging occurred at the site at regular intervals until the 199os or early 2000s. The National Gypsum plant was shut down in early 2009 and then resumed shipping in 2o18. The area where the dredged material will be stored is approximately 25 acres and has previously been used as a dredged material disposal facility. National Gypsum has utilized this disposal facility for dredged material disposal as recent as the 2000s. This site is owned by Bate, Land and Timber (BLT) Trust. The adjacent property land use consislts of mixed industrial and commercially developed properties. National Gypsum is located in a highly industrial area, with adjacent activities including fuel processing plants and commercial ports; all have commercial docks. The channel of the Cape Fear River is continually maintained for commercial navigation by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)!, Proposed Dredging Methodology: Thel proposed maintenance dredging will be performed via hydraulic dredging (cutter suction dredge) and will consist of a cutter head and a hydraulic booster pump. The cutter hdad will be lowered into the sediment bed to fluidize the sediment agitation and to draw the slurry into the suction pipe. The material will then be pumped through a sunken pipe that extends across the bottom of the Cape Fear River and into the upland CDF. The dredge material will be discharged at the CDF that will be isolated by an earthen berm. A backhoe will move the pipe/material around as needed within the CDF during dredging. Water pumped with the dredge material will be contained in the placement site until the solids settle out. Once settled, the effluent will drain back to the river in a controlled manner through the weir. Both the weir elevation and effluent content will be monitored to stay within permitted effluent parameters. Sediment sampling was performed a� the proposed dredge area in November 2oi9. The results noted wood debris in some of the samples collected. Therefore, mechanical dredging will be also used in spot locations where excessive timber is present, since mechanical dredging more effectively removes sediment with timber. Mechanical dredging will be performed via clamshell to remove the material, which will then be placed in a scow. The material will then be transported to the disposal facility. Work associated with the proposed project will only take 1 to 2 months. Specifically, the maintenance dredging will only take up to 1 week to complete; a turbidity barrier will be implemented around the dredge. Prior to the maintenance dredging, the pipe will be strung i across the bottom of the river, which will take about 2 days. Some minor construction is National Gypsum Wilmington — Maintenance Dredge -3- Proiect Narrative anticipated at the CDF to prepare for the disposal of the dredge material; this work is anticipated to take approximately 2 to 4 weeks. Proposed Dredge Material Disposal: National Gypsum intends to dispose of the dredge material at an existing private confined disposal facility located in Brunswick County (Parcel No. 059000o6) at approximately 34.176788 N,-77.963510 W, which is across the river from the proposed maintenance dredging area. The dredged material CDF is currently owned by Bate, Land and Timber (BLT) Trust. Urban anticipates that the dredge disposal will be placed on approximately 25 acres of the CDF, primarily in the area previously used for dredge disposal. The dredged material will be confined on via a dike to prevent spill -over of solids into any marsh or surrounding waters. Water pumped with the dredged material will be contained in the placement site until the solids settle out. The material will be stabilized to keep sediments from entering adjacent waters or wetlands. The effluent will drain back to the river in a controlled manner through the weir. Effluent will be contained in a pipe and discharged at a point in the water past visible vegetation and below the normal low water line to prevent gully erosion and unnecessary siltation. A water control structure will be installed at the intake end of the effluent pipe to assure compliance with water quality standards. Effluent sampling and monitoring will be performed to adhere to water quality standards, including stopping dredging and treating effluent, as needed. Timber crane mats will be placed on an approximately 35 feet swath the wetland slopes past the berms for equipment access and pipeline path. The timber crane mats will be placed on the minimal area of wetlands possible to minimize temporary impacts to the wetlands. Seasonal restrictions for maintenance dredging will be adhered to as directed by the regulatory agencies. Historic Permits: Permits have been issued for dredging in this area in the past. On August 30,1994/September 14,1994, Permit No.102-94 (Water Quality Certification No. 2668) was issued by the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health & Natural Resources and Coastal Resources Commission Division of Coastal Management (DCM) and USACE (Action No. 199403672) to dredge the area to -35 MLW via hydraulic dredging. The DCM permit was renewed on February 18,1998 and April 21, 2003 to perform maintenance dredging in this area. The DCM Permit 102-94 was modified on November 17, 2003 to increase the dredge depth to -44 feet MLW. IN six 15 June 25, 2020 Return Receipt Requested Kinder Morgan Terminals Wilmington, LLC 3340 River Road Wilmington, NC 28412 Dear Sir or Madam: National Gypsum Company is applying for a CAMA Major Permit to perform maintenance dredging at their shipping berth located in the Cape Fear River, adjacent to 838 Sunnyvale Drive in Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina. The specifics of the proposed work are in the enclosed application forms and drawings. I As the adjacent riparian property owner to the aforementioned project, I am required to notify you of the project in order to give you the opportunity to comment on the project. Please review the attached permit application and drawings.'Please then indicate if you have any objections to this proposal on the attached Adjacent Riparian Property Owner Statement and complete the bottom of the form. Should you have any objections to this MacPherson, North Carolina Departmen Management, 127 Cardinal Drive Ext., receipt of this notice. Such comments w decision on the application. No commer considered as no objection. If you have 3125, or e-mail me at ilwaters(c4urbanene Very truly yours, URBAN ENGINEERS, INC. Jennifer L. Waters, P.E. Permit Coordinator Enclosures 3oposal, please send your written comments to Tara of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Coastal Nilmington, NC 28405-3845 within 30 days of your 1 be considered by the Department in reaching a final within 30 days of your receipt of this notice will be ry questions on this project, please call me at 215-284- CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER STATEMENT I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to National Gypsum Company 's 838 SunnyvaleName of Profrty Owner) property located at yvale Drive, Wilmington, NC 284�2 (Address, Lot, Block, Road, etc.) on Cape Fear River in Wilmington, New Hanover N.C. (Waterbody) (City/Town and/or County) The applicant has described to me, as shown below, the development proposed at the above location. I have no objection to this proposal. I have objections to this proposal. Project description and site drawing are attached. If you have objections to what is proposed, you must notify the Division of Coastal Management (DCM) in writing within 10 days of receipt of this notice. Contact information for DCM office is available at http://www.nccoastaimanagement.nettweb/cm/staff-listing or by calling 1-888-4RCOAST. No response is considered the same as no objection if you have been notified by Certified Mail. WAIVER SECTION I understand that a pier, dock, mooring pilings, boat ramp, breakwater, boathouse, lift, or groin must be set back a minimum distance of 15' from my area of riparian access unless waived by me. (If you wish to waive the setback, you must initial the appropriate blank below.) I do wish to waive the 15' setback requirement. This section is not I do not wish to waive the 15' setback requirement. applicable (Property Owner Information) re Meehan Zehringer Print or Type Name 90W Rexford Rnad Mailing Address Charlotte, NC 28211 City/Stafe,Zip. 7n4-365-73nn Telephone Number/email address OZ.IVNZm Date *Valid for one calendar year after signature* (Adjacent Property Owner Information) Signature* Print or Type Name Mailing Address City/Statemp Telephone Number/email address Date* (Revised Aug. 2014) Notional Gypsum Wilmington — Maintenance Dredge -1- Proiect Narrative Project Narrative National Gypsum Wilmington — Maintenance Dredging Project Name: National Gypsum Wilmington Maintenance Dredging Project Description: The proposed project includes maintenance dredging at National Gypsum's Wilmington commercial berth facility to a depth of -36' MLW (~12,000 cubic yards of material) and -2 feet overdredge (-5,00o cubic yards of material) in order to continue National Gypsum's operations at their Wilmington Facility. This project consists of dredging approximately 17,000 cubic yards of silt, clay, and sand from the navigable waters of the United States. The dredge quantities were calculated based on the latest sounding). The dredge material is anticipated be disposed at a private confined disposal facility (CDF) located in Brunswick County (Parcel No. o5g00006) at approximately 34.176788 N,-77.963510 W, which is directly across the river from the proposed maintenance dredging area. This project is considered maintenance dredging since the berthing area was dredged in the past. No portion of this maintenance dredging project has been completed yet. Owner's Contact Engineer's Contact Ms. Meghan Zehringer Mr. Peter Brennan, PE Engineering Project Manager Deputy Practice Leader, Ports & Waterways National Gypsum Company Urban Engineers, Inc. 2ooi Rexford Road 530 Walnut Street, 14th Floor Charlotte, NC 28211 Philadelphia, PA 19106-3586 (704) 365-7268 (phone) (215) 922-8080 (phone) (704) 365-7316 (fax) (215) 922-8082 (fax) Where: National Gypsum Company 838 Sunnyvale Drive Wilmington, NC 28412 Project Purpose and Need: Maintenance dredging is imperative at the National Gypsum Wilmington facility in order for National Gypsum to continue their operations in this region. This area has not been dredged since at least the early 20oos and therefore there is a significant need to deepen the berthing area to ensure the safe passage of ships and to accommodate the ships required for National Gypsum to receive gypsum shipments. If the berthing area is not dredged, this will lead to significant financial implications for National Gypsum and ultimately impact the local economy. The proposed dredging is anticipated to occur in the late fall/early winter of 20120/2021. The proposed dredging will not change the use of the site. Site Background and Current Conditions: The proposed approximately 2.o-acre maintenance dredging area is owned liy National Gypsum Company (NGC) and is located in the Cape Fear River (Stream Classification "SC") at approximately Lat: 34.17375 N, Long: - 75.957511 W in New Hanover County. IThe area to be dredged is National Gypsum's berth in the Cape Fear River. The Cape Fear River bottom material in the vicinity of the proposed maintenance dredging area is composed of silt, clay, sand and some wood debris, per the sediment sampling in November 2oig'. The project area is located in open water with depths ranging from approximately -12 MLW to -37 MLW. Due to past maintenance dredging and National Gvosum Wilmington — Maintenance Dredee -2- Project Narrative past frequent use of the area by large ships, submerged vegetation is not located within the project area. National Gypsum Company uses the facility for unloading gypsum for wallboard production at the wallboard plant across River Road. The manufacturing facilities are located on the east side of SR lioo with a conveyor belt crossing the highway to the property on the west side. The conveyor continues along a pier extending into Cape Fear River terminating on the shipping berth. There is a paved access way from SR 110o to the river. The existing berthing facility extends approximately 1,68o feet into the Cape Fear River, with a dock extending approximately 195 feet to the north of the pier. The National Gypsum Wilmington facility was constructed in 1975, at which time the river adjacent to the berth was dredged to a depth of 35 feet MLW. Maintenance dredging occurred at the site at regular intervals until the 19gos or early 20oos. The National Gypsum plant was shut down in early 2009 and then resumed shipping in 2018. The area where the dredged material will be stored is approximately 25 acres and has previously been used as a dredged material disposal facility. National Gypsum has utilized this disposal facility for dredged material disposal as recent as the 2000s. This site is owned by Bate, Land and Timber (BLT) Trust. The adjacent property land use consists of mixed industrial and commercially developed properties. National Gypsum is located in a highly industrial area, with adjacent activities including fuel processing plants and commercial ports; all have commercial docks. The channel of the Cape Fear River is continually maintained for commercial navigation by the i` US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Proposed Dredging Methodology; Thei proposed maintenance dredging will be performed via hydraulic dredging (cutter suction dredge) and will consist of a cutter head and a hydraulic booster pump. The cutter head will be lowered into the sediment bed to fluidize the sediment agitation and to draw the slurry into the suction pipe. The material will then be pumped through a sunken pipe that extends across the bottom of the Cape Fear River and into the upland CDF. The dredge material will be discharged at the CDF that will be isolated by an earthen berm. A backhoe will move the pipe/material around as needed within the CDF during dredging. Water pumped with the dredge material will be contained in the placement site until the solids settle out. Once settled, the effluent will drain back to the river in a controlled manner through the weir. Both the weir elevation and effluent content will be monitored to stay within permitted leffluent parameters. Sediment sampling was performed at the proposed dredge area in November 20i9. The results noted wood debris in some of the samples collected. Therefore, mechanical dredging will be also used in spot locations where excessive timber is present, since mechanical dredging more effectively removes sediment with timber. Mechanical dredging will be performed via clamshell to remove the material, which will then be placed in a scow. The material will then be transported to thle disposal facility. Work associated with the proposed pl oject will only take 1 to 2 months. Specifically, the maintenance dredging will only take up to 1 week to complete; a turbidity barrier will be j implemented around the dredge. Prior to the maintenance dredging, the pipe will be strung ( across the bottom of the river, which will take about 2 days. Some minor construction is National Gypsum Wilmington — Maintenance Dredge -3- Proiect Narrative anticipated at the CDF to prepare for- the disposal of the dredge material; this work is anticipated to take approximately 2 to 4 weeks. Proposed Dredge Material Disposal: National Gypsum intends to dispose of the dredge material at an existing private confined disposal facility located in Brunswick County (Parcel No. 05900006) at approximately 34.176788 N,-77.963510 W, which is across the river from the proposed maintenance dredging area. The dredged material CDF is currently owned by Bate, Land and Timber (BLT) Trust. Urban anticipates that the dredge disposal will be placed on approximately 25 acres of the CDF, primarily in the area previously used for dredge disposal. The dredged material will be confined on via a dike to prevent spill -over of solids into any marsh or surrounding waters. Water pumped with the dredged material will be contained in the placement site until the solids settle out. The material will be stabilized to keep sediments from entering adjacent waters or wetlands. The effluent will drain back to the river in a controlled manner through the weir. Effluent will be contained in a pipe and discharged at a point in the water past visible vegetation and below the normal low water line to prevent gully erosion and unnecessary siltation. A water control structure will be installed at the intake end of the effluent pipe to assure compliance with water quality standards. Effluent sampling and monitoring will be performed to adhere to water quality standards, including stopping dredging and treating effluent, as needed. Timber crane mats will be placed on an approximately 35 feet swath the wetland slopes past the berms for equipment access and pipeline path. The timber crane mats will be placed on the minimal area of wetlands possible to minimize temporary impacts to the wetlands. Seasonal restrictions for maintenance dredging will be adhered to as directed by the regulatory agencies. Historic Permits: Permits have been issued for dredging in this area in the past. On August 30,1994/September 14,1994, Permit No. 102-94 (Water Quality Certification No. 2668) was issued by the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health & Natural Resources and Coastal Resources Commission Division of Coastal Management (DCM) and USACE (Action No.199403672) to dredge the area to -35 MLW via hydraulic dredging. The DCM permit was renewed on February 18, 1998 and April 21, 2003 to perform maintenance dredging in this larea. The DCM Permit 102-94 was modified on November 17, 2003 to increase the dredge depth to -44 feet MLW. CNorth Carolina Department of Environmental Quality /c/yc� Division of Coastal Management X Major Permit Application Section 11—Stormwater Management JD URBAn■ CAMA MAJOR PERMIT APPLICATION SECTION 11- STORMWATER MANAGEMENT The proposed maintenance dredge area will not lead to an increase in built -upon area; the proposed project consists of maintenance dredging only. Therefore a stormwater management plan is not required. A No Exposure Certification for stormwater exemption is being pursued for the CDF where the dredge material will be disposed as discussed during the Scoping Meeting. Minor stormwater permits related to the maintenance and/or improvements to the CDF weir structures and outlet pipes will also be pursued. These permit applications have not been submitted yet. l North Carolina Department ofEnvironmenta! Quality ` faYit Division of Coastal Management W Major Permit Application Section /2—Ocean and Inle! Hazard J� uReAn■ CAMA MAJOR PERMIT APPLICATION SECTION 12 - OCEAN AND INLET HAZARD The proposed project are is not located within oceanfront or inlet areas, therefore an Area of Environmental Concern Hazard Notice Form is not required. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Coastal Management ,Cc Major Permit Application ryC: W Section 13 —Historic Permits J� URBRn■ CAMA MAJOR PERMIT APPLICATION SECTION 13 - HISTORIC PERMITS Permits have been issued for dredging in this area in the past. On August 30, 1994/September 14, 1994, Permit No. 102-94 (Water Quality Certification No. 2668) was issued by the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health & Natural Resources and Coastal Resources Commission Division of Coastal Management (DCM) and USACE (Action No. 199403672) to dredge the area to -35 MLW via hydraulic dredging. The DCM permit was renewed on February 18, 1998 and April 21, 2003 to perform maintenance dredging in this area. The DCM Permit 102-94 was modified on November 17, 2003 to increase the dredge depth to -44 feet MLW. The permits are provided in this section. Permit Class NEW PermiiNumber STATE O NQ IN 102-94 nGi Department of Envi qetlia Natural Resources IstalJ.esgyrces Cmommi�s qn N 0 7 1994 �i. ..( -'� D I V I S 10 N O F— Major Develo(igient rp"'an-Aie"a , uriv rodmental Concern OOASTAL MANAGEMENrs 1PuuanttoNCGS rl3Q1 , =` OUAOA "r�-R'�,� %" Excavation and/or fillirig Pursuant to NCGS ] 13-229 Issued to National Gypsum Gorman 838. Sunnyvale Drive Wilmington, NC 28412 authorizing development in New Hanover I' County at the Cabe Pear River at the junction _ of Sunnyvale Drive and River Rdas requested in the pemtittee's application dated 5/16/94 and attached workplan drawings 5, sheets 1-3 dated rec'd 5/25/94 & sheets 4 5 dated reed 7/5/94 This permit, issued on AUGUST 30, 1994 is subject to compliance with the application (whemconsistent with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may be subject to a fate, imprisonment or civil action; ormay cause the permit to be null and void, 1) In order to protect juvenile shrimp and frnfish populations, no excavation or filling will be permitted between August 1 and January 31 of any year without the prior approval of the Division of Coastal Management, in consultation with, the Division of Marine Fisheries. i 2) Excavation will not exceed thirty-five 3) The temporary placement or double vegetated wetlands is not authorized. feet below the elevation of mean low water (MLW). of excavated or fill materials within waters or 4) No excavated or fill material will be placed at any time, in any marsh or surrounding waters, outside of the alignment of the fill area indicated on the workplan drawings. (See attached sheet for Additional Conditions) This permit action may be. appealed by the permittee or other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the issuing date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work initiation or continuance, as the case maybe. This permit must be accessible on -site to Department Personnel when the project is inspected for compliance. I. Any maintenance work or project modification not covered hereunder requires futtherDepartmental approval. All work must cease when the permit expires on December 31, 1997 'In Issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees gnat your project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal Management Program. Signed by the authority of the Secretary OfDEIM and the Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission. . 4 .dlr+ Roger . Schecter, Director Division of Coastal Management This permit and its conditions are hereby, accepted. Signature of Permittee M National Gypsum Company Permit #102-94 Page 2 of 2 ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS 5) All excavated materials will be confined landward of the mean high water (IV HW) elevation contour within adequate dikes or other retaining structures to prevent spillover of solids into any vegetated wetlands or surrounding waters. 6) The terminal end of the pipeline from the dredge into the diked retention area will be positioned at or greater than 50 feet from any part of the dike and a maximum distance from spillways to prevent dike erosion and to allow.adequate settlement of suspended solids. T) A water control structure will be installed at the intake end of the effluent pipe leading from the retention area in order to ensure maximum settlement of suspended solids. 8) Flow from the diked retention area will be confined by pipe, trough, or similar device to a point ator below the mean low water (MLW)� elevation. contour to prevent gully erosion and siltation. 9) No vegetated wetlands will be excavated. NOTE: This project is authorized by the Division of Environmental Management under General Water Quality Certification #26¢8. NOTE: The pemuttee should contact New Hanover County Mosquito Control prior to placing fill on Eagle Island.. 10) This permit does not authorize the Mi tell erence with any existing or proposed Federal project, and the permittee will not be entitled to compensation for damage or injury to the authorized structure or work which may be caused from existing or future operations undertaken by the United States in the public interest. f:.. Permit Number WMUTIa1►11 1 ' - STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IlYL94 Department of Environment Healtik&.Natural Resources I : and Coastal Resources Commission P�I�C.It : �IISIIIn SEP 2 0 1994 for % Major Development in in Area of Environmental ConcentDIVISION OF pursuant toNCGS 113A-418 COASTAL MANAGEMENT X -Excavation and/or frllingpursuant to NCGS 113-229 Issued to National Gypsum Company, 838 Sunnyvale Drive, `'Vilmin¢ton. NC 28412 authorizing development in New Hanover County at the Cape Fear River, at the junction of Sunnyvale Dr, & River Road as requested in the petmittee's application dated 5/16/94 & attached workplan drawings, 5, sheets 1-3 dated received 5125/94 & sheets 4-5 dated received 7/5/94 This permit, issued on SEPTEMBER 14, 1994 , is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may be subject to a fine, imprisonmenror civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and void. 1). In order to protect juvenile shrimp and finfish populations, no excavation or filling will be permitted between February 1 and Julyl31 of any year without the prior approval of the Division of Coastal Management, in consultation with the Division of, Marine Fisheries. 2) Excavation will not exceed thirty-five (35) feet below the elevation of mean low water (MLR). 3) The temporary placement or double- landling of excavated or fill materials within waters or vegetated wetlands is not authorized. 4) No excavated or fill material will be placed at any time, in any marsh or surrounding waters, outside of the alignment of the fill area indicated on the workplan drawings. (See attached sheet for Additional Conditions) This permit action may be appealed by the pemrittee other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of t issuing date. An appeal requires resolution prior to we initiation or continuance, as the case maybe. This permit must be accessible on -site to personnel when the project is inspected for cc Any maintenance work or project modification not covered hereunder requires further Departmental approval. All work must cease when the permit expires on December 31, 1997 j In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees your project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal Management program. Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DEHNR and the Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission. 764%- Roger N. Se ecter, Director Division of Coastal Management This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted. Signature of Permittee National Gypsum Company ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS Permit #102-94 Page 2 of 2 5) All excavated materials will be confined landward of the mean high water (MHW) elevation contour within adequate dikes or other retaining structures to prevent spillover of solids into any vegetated wetlands or surrounding waters. 6) The terminal end of the pipeline from the dredge into the diked retention area will be positioned at or greater than 50 feet from any part of the dike and a maximum distance from spillways to prevent dike erosion and.to allow adequate settlement of suspended solids. 7) A water control structure will be installed at the intake end of the effluent pipe leading from the retention area in order to ensure maximum settlement of suspended solids. 8) Flow from the diked retention area will be confined by pipe, trough, or similar device to a point at or below the mean low water (MI.W) elevation contour to prevent gully erosion and siltation. 9) No vegetated wetlands will be excw NOTE: This project is authorized by Water Quality Certification 3 NOTE:. The permittee should contact fill on Eagle Island. 10) This permit does not authorize the and the permittee will not be entitl structure or work which may be cs United States in the public interest. Division of Environmental Management under General Hanover County Mosquito Control prior to placing 'erference with any existing or proposed Federal project, to. compensation for damage or injury to. the authorized ,led from existing or future operations undertaken by the DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS TIC/,j r P.O. BOX 7890 WILMINGTON, I NORTH CAROLINA28402.1890 IN REPLY REFER TO August B, 1994 y' Regulatory Branch Action ZD No. 199403672 Mr. John Parker 4UG 1 Division of Coastal Management North Carolina Department of Environment, DIVISIOP7 OF Health, and Natural Resources COASTAL IVIANAGEMEN Post Office Box 27687 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 -- Dear Mr. Parker. I . Reference the. application of National Gypsum Company for a Department of the -- - ' liar oz.`Nati%ona7:;*gum Pi4uit, New Hanover County, North Carolina.. The Federal agencies have completed review of the proposal as presented by the application and your field investigation report. We recommend that the followi authorization; ng conditions be included in the State a. All work authorized by this permit must be performed in strict compliance with the permit plans. b. in order to protect juvenile shrimp and fin fish populations, no excavation will be permitted between the dates of April 1 and September 30 of any' year without the prior approval of the North Caro Management. lina Division of Coastal c. All excavated materials will be confined landward of the mean high water (MHW) elevation contour within structures to prevent spillover of sadequate dikes or other retaining surrounding waters. I olids into .any vegetated wetlands or d. The terminal end of the pipeline from the dredge into the diked retention area will be positioned at or greater than 50 feet from any part of the dike and maximum distance from spillways to prevent dike erosion allow adequate settlement of suspended solids. and to e. A water control structure will be installed at the intake end of'the effluent pipe leading from the retention area in order to ensure maximum settlement of suspended solids. f. Flow from the diked retention area will be confined by pipe, trough, or similar device to a point at or below the mean low water (MLW) elevation contour to prevent gully erosion and siltation, g. No vegetated wetlands will be excavated or filled. h. Excavation will not exceed thirty-five (35) feet -below the elevation of mean low water (Mm) . .z- i. This permit does not authorize the interference with any existing or Proposed Federal project, and the ipermittes will not be entitled to compensation for damage or injuryito the authorized structure or work which may be caused from existing or future operations undertaken by the United States in the public interest. j. The activity will be conducted in such a manner'as to prevent a significant increase in turbidity! Outside the area of conatructibn or construction-related.discharge. Increases such that the turbidity in the waterbody is 25 NW,s or are not considered significant. Questions or comments may be addressed to Mr. Jeff Ritcher, Wilmington Field Office, Regulatory Branch; teleghone (910) 251-4636. Sincerely, I Copies Furnished: Mr. John Dorney Water Quality Section Division of Environmental Management North Carolina Department of Environment, Health; and Natural Resources Poet Office Box 29535 Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-053I Me.'L. K. (Mike) Gantt U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Fish and Wildlife Enhancement Poet Office Box 33726 Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726 G. Wayne Wright Chief, Regulatory Branch Mr. Larry Hardy National Marine Fisheries Service Fivers Island Beaufort, North Carolina 28516 Mr. Thomas Welborn, Chief U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Region IV Wetlands Regulatory Unit 345 Courtland Street, N.H. Atlanta, Georgia 30365 .X�C. Robert Stroud, Jr. Wilmington Regional office North Carolina Division of Coastal Management . 127 Cardinal Drive'Extension Wilmington, North Carolina 28405-3845 To: John Dorney Planning Branch DIVISION OF REVIEWER: GREGSO WQ SUPERVISOR: ADKINS DATE: July 27, 1994 PERMIT YR: 94 PERMIT NO.: 94638 COUNTY: New Hanover PROJECT NAME: National Gypsum Company PROJECT TYPE: Dredging PERMIT TYPE: CAMA COE A N/A DOT#: N/A RCD FROM CDA: DCM DATE FROM CDA: July 13, REG OFFICE: WiRO RIVER AND! SUB BASIN#: 030617 *STREAM OR ADJACENT WATER BODY: Cape Fear River CLASS: SC STREAM INDEX Al I&M) *OPEN OR CLOSED: Closed WL IMPACT: N/A WL TYPE: N/A WL REQUESTED: N/A WL ACR EST: N/A WL SCORE: N/A MITIGATION: N/A MITIGATION TYPE: N/A MITIGATION SIZE: N/A RATING' SBEET ATTACIIED?; RECOMMENDATION: ISSUE STORMWATER PLAN REQ'D: No IF YES, DATE APPROVED: 1994 N/A PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to maintenance dredge around the National Gypsum Plant Docks. WATER QUALITY CERT. (401) t �3 ' CERT. REQ'D:'Yes IF YES, TYPE: General Certification #2668 for dredge spoil dewatering. AUG 10 1994 SEWAGE DISPOSAL TYPE OF DISPOSAL PROPOSED: TO BE PERMITTED BY: N/A IF BY DEM, IS SITE AVAILABLE WATER/WETLAND FILL AREA OF FILL - WATER: N/A IS FILL ELIMINATING A SI DREDGING IS DREDGING ACTIVITY EXPECTE OF RESOURCE? No IS SPOIL DISPOSAL ADEQUATELY DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT PERMIT ISSUANCE PROBABLE: N/A N/A USE? N/A TO CAUSE A SIGNIFICANT LOSS N/A 44638.Jul f�N Page Two MARINA ARE THE FOLLOWING ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED? SEWAGE DISPOSAL: N/A MARINA SERVICES: N/A OXYGEN IN BASIN: N/A CLOSURE OF SHELLFISHING WATERS: N/A (ATTACH A MARINA USE ATTAINABILITY EVAL.) done in such a manner so as to not exceed 25 NTU. i cc: Central Files pr.y. 1WiriglongonajThfieF1s DCM=Tere Barrett John Parker RESTRICTIONS: That the project be outside the immediate construction area to f nSION OF COASTAL MANACRMENT FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT 1. APPLICANT'S NAME: National Gypsum Company 2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Adjacent to the Cape Fear River at the junction of Sunnyvale Dr. and River Rd. (SR 1100) at the National Gypsum Shipping Berth. Photo Index - 1989: 179-30 GR. A - 15, 16, 17 1984: 15-190 GR. X - 5, 6 State Plane Coordinates - X: 2315450 Y: 156900 (Spoil) 2314000 162000 3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: Dredge & Fill, CAMA 4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 06/14/94 Was Applicant Present - Yes 5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - cc: 06/14/94 Office Wilmington 6. SITE DESCRIPTION: (A) Local Land Use Plan - New Hanpver County Land Classification From LUP -1 Conservation, Developed (H) AEC(s) Involved: ES, PT, EW i (C) Water Dependent: Yes (D) Intended Use: Commercial (E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - City Sewer Planned - None (F) Type of Structures: Existing - Gypsum Processing Plant, Conveyor belt, Shipping Berth (G) Estimated Annual Rate of Source - 7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: ied -None N/A [AREA] DREDGED FILLED OTHER (A) Vegetated Wetlands (B) Non -Vegetated Wetlands (C) Other Shallow bottom 73 acres High ground 261.7 acres (D) Total Area Disturbed: 262.4 acres (E) Primary Nursery Area: Yes (F) Water Classification: SC Open: No resource 8. PROJECT SUMMARY: Applicant,proposes the maintenance dredging around the stripping berth of the National Gypsum Plant. National Gypsum Company „r Page 2 . 9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 07/05/94 The Project site is a 91.5 acre tract having a gypsum processing plant adjacent to the Cape Fear River. This is located at the junction of Sunnyvale Road and SR 1100 in New Hanover County. The manufacturing facilities are located on the east side of SR 1100,, with a conveyor belt crossing the highway to the property on the west side. The conveyor continues along a pier extending into the Cape Fear River terminating on the shipping berth: There is a paved access way from SR1100 to the river, with a small parking area. This is an area of high industrial activity with such facilities as fuel processing plants, the State Ports, etc. All have commercial docks. The channel of the river is maintained for commercial navigation by the US Awry Corps of Engineers to a depth if 38-40 feet. The tract is typically vegetated with high ground species, and has been used for spoil placement in the past. Along the river, Pbragmites australis. Svaitina alterniflora, and Juncus roemerianus exist. Elevation extends up to 15 feet. This area of New Hanover County is classified Developed in the New Hanover County Land Use Plan, while the portion within the 100 year flood plain his classifiedas Conservation. The waters of the Cape Fear River are classified SC by the Division of 1 nnonmental Management, the area has been designated as a Primary. Nursery by the Division of Marine Fisheries, and there is no shellfish resource. This facility was constructed in 1975, at which time the river adjacent to the berth was dredged to a depth of 35 feet. This area was re -excavated to establish this depth in 1987. The proposal is for maintenance dredging of the shipping berth once again to -35'. Because of the necessity for maintaining this depth, and the anticipated need for the same in the future, the annficant has requested a 10 year maintenance clause be added to his permit conditions. The ,existing berthing facility extends aI extending approximately 195' to the north of the 845' x 180'. The area that has shoaled and is pro soundings of -21' m1w to-341.m1w. The adjoin] material is stated to be composed of silt and sari: depth of -35' m1w. This will -remove approxim; oximately 16801into the Cape Fear River, with a dock ar. The excavated basin around the dock is approximately sed for dredging is approximately 530' x 60', with average bottom contours. average -36' m1w to -44' m1w. Bottom This area is proposed for hydraulic dredging to a finished ly 8244 cubic yards of material. Spoil from the project area will be placed within the existing dike system used and owned by the US Army Corps of Engineers on the south end of Eagle. Island. This site is across the river and to the north of the project site. Permission is on life for the use of this site. The dished area is approximately 1900' x 6000', with a stilling basin of approximately 5' in elevation. Any maintenance necessary to the dike walls will be done prior to use. The influent pipe is proposed to extend at least 70 feet into the dike wall. The effluent pipe is to extend over wetlands to the mean low water contour. National Gypsum Company f Page Three 10. ANTICIPATED RAPACTS The excavation will cause the disturbance of 31, 800 square feet of bottom area., 'Ile project will, remove approximately 8244 cubic yards of material from the system. There will be an increase in turbidity during excavation. Spoil placement will cause the disruption of an existing 262 acre spoil site. Project use will remain the same. Submitted by: Tere Barrett Date: 07/05/94 Office: Wilmington Recommendations for State Permit National ;Gypsum Company Because this area of the Cape Fear River is maintained for commercial navigation by the industries using the resource as well as the US Army Corps of Engineers, and there is no shallow bottom habitat within the project area, I recommend the project be approved with a 10 year maintenance clause based on the following conditions: 1) In order to protect juvenile shrimp and finfish populations, no excavation or filling will be permitted between April 1 and September 30 of any year without the prior approval of the Division of Coastal Management, in consultation with the Division of Marine Fisheries. 2) Excavation will not exceed 35 feet below the normal water level. 3) The temporary placement or double -handling of excavated or fill materials within waters or vegetated wetlands is not authorized. .: 4) No excavated or fill material will be placed at any time, in any marsh or surrounding waters, outside of the alignment of the fill area indicated on the workplat(s). 5) Ail excavated materials will be confined alive mean high water and landward of regularly or irregularly flooded marsh behind adequate dikes or otlier retaining structures to prevent spill -over of solids into any marsh or surrounding waters. 6) The disposal area effluent will be contained by pipe, trough,. or sirnilar device to a point at or beyond, the mean low water level to prevent gully, erosion and unnecessary.siltation. 'n The terminal end of the pipeline will be positioned at or greater than fifty feet (50') from any part of the dike and a maximum distance from spillways to allow settlement of suspended solids. 8) A water control structure will be installed at the intake end of the effluent pipe to assure compliance with water quality standards... . P°"? DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF. ENGINEERS I P.O. BOX logo WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROUNA2SM-1890 3�1v .�i 199`t —r Regulatory Branch Action ID. 114103(412 Applicant Gypttm co "n Pgv1� Waterway Care Ft'r Rl.p County New N"idlmr Type Work Mainde»an� Mr. Larry Hardy — National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA - Pivers Island Beaufort, North Carolina 28516 Ms. L. K. (Mike) Gantt Fish and Wildlife Enhancement U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Fost Office Box 33726 Raleigh,.North Carolina 27636-3726 Mr. Thomas Welborn, Chief Wetlands Regulatory Section -Region IV - Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds Branch U.S. Environmental Protect P 345 Courtland 'Stree 3i Atlanta, Georgia 30 1994 Mr. John Parker Division of Coastal Management North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Post Office Box 27687 R leiggh, .North aroollinna2761111--7687 Wi)Vv�,:44VA Regional Office Division of Coastal Management North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources ITO 9s, Ex+. Wi�vhtnod�rov._ , N.LG 711105 Gentlemen: DIVISION OF p� %�p�AGEMEN7 Pursuant to Acti1,gNArNo.N198000291, the CAMA-Corps general permit/processing /� agreement, a State Field Investigation Report is enclosed. Your comments nd/or recommendations would be appreciated on or before Questions or comments may be Regulatory Branch, Enclosure to Mr.' u¢, RlchkeY Field Office, telephone (U) 251- 463Co Sincerely, 1 _ a e W418ay Chi RegBranch NOTICE iOF FII,ING OF APPLICATION FOR CAMA MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PERMIT The Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources hereby gives public notice as required by NCGS 113A-119(b) that application for a development permit in an Area of Environmental concern as designated under the CAMA was received on June 14, 1994. According to said application, National Gypsum Company proposes the maintenance dredging around the shipping berth of the National Gypsum Plant,, adjacent to the Cape Fear River at the junction of Sunnyvale Drive and River Road at the National Gypsum Shipping Berth, in Wilmington, NC, in New Hanover County. A copy of the entire application may be examined or copied at the office of Environment, Health and Natural Resources, 127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, North Carolina 28405, (910/395-3900) Comments marled to Roger N. P. O. Box 27687, Raleigh, N. C., making the permit decision. Later coi of permit decision. Project modifica' public and state and federal agencies. provided upon written request. normal business hours. oter, Director, Division of Coastal Management, prior to August 12, 1994, will be considered in will be accepted and considered up to the time may occur based on review and comment by the PUBLISHED ON: Saturday, July 23, 1994 of the permit decision in this matter will be ♦S". JMp� State of North Carolina Department of Environment, .Health, and Natural Resources Division of Coastal Management Wilmington Regional Office James B. Hunt; Jr., Governor Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary July 7, 1994 National Environmental Technologies, Inc. 295-A Green Meadows Drive Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Dear Mr. Harts: The Division of Coastal Management hereby development of the property of the National Gypsum 1 Carolina, in New Hanover County. it was received processing at this time. The projected deadline for mal period is provided by law when such time is necessary action by the initial deadline stated Above, you should c his letter will serve as. your notice of an extended rev: e 75th day. NCGS 113A-119(b) requires that Notice of an Enclosed you will find a "Notice of Permit Filing" l development. You should post this notice at a conspi public road. Some examples would be: Nailing the r fronting your property; or at a point along the road rig Failure to post this notice could result in an incomph A field report has been prepared and is in the agencies for their comments. If additional informatir directly. TB/ek Enclosure W. John Parker 0 WIN: i Ann Hines, LPO Jeff Richter, COE 127 cardiml Drive Extension, VAraloston, Roger N. Schecter Director cknowledgm receipt of your application for State approval for bmpany located at 838 Sunnyvale Drive in Wilmington, North completed on June 14, 1994,. and appears to be adequate for ing a decision is August 27, 1994. An additional 75-day review to complete the review. If you have not been notified of a final insider the review period extended. Under those circumstances, >w. However, an additional letter will be provided on or about plication be posted at the location of the proposed development. xcard which must be posted at the property of your proposed ous point along your property where it can be observed from a ice card to a telephone pole or tree along the road right-of-way of -way where a private road would lead one into your property. application. -ocess of being circulated to the various state and federal review is required based on this review, the agencies may contact you Sincerely, Tere Barrett Field Representative 28405-3645 a Telephone 910395.3900 0 Fax 910,i50-2004 An EVd OppMhdq AtLrmadve Action Employer ATTACHMENT 5 PROPERTY DEED ^:;'V. CiVtJ. J nlii_C1T COFSTF.L tv;A,P.F.G` f'1100K PALL 1684 O011i f�. :tar• . H1GI::iLit u; r xl i'. I16ae YL11 Cu tit, Grantee', Address Is: '93 JUL 20 RM 8 32 National Gypsum Company Suite 700 2501 Cedar Springs Road Dallas, Texas 75201.1433 WARRANTY T)IREW AM ASSIG THE STATE OF NORTH. CAROLINA 5 5 KNOWAILMENBYTHEMPRESENTS: COUNTY OF NEW HANOVER 5 That on October 28,1990, National Gypsum Company, a Delaware corporation now (mown as Asbestos Claims Management Corporation s; tenants), filed Its petition for relief under Title 1I of the United:States Bankruptcy Code (the with the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division (the "Senn" ), styled In re National Gypsum Company, a Delaware corporation, and Aancor Holdings, Ica, aDelaware corporation, Case Nos, 390-37213SAP-11'and 390.37214SAR11 (Jointly Administered); and That on March 9,1993, the Court entered its order ("2E&f) confinaninj the Fiat Amended and Restated Jolat Plan of Reorganization of National Gypsum Company (VA NM and Aancor Holdings, Ine. CA4J1t n, as modified (as confirmed, topether with any and all modifications thmu6 the date hereof, the OW, and, In coan"dOn with such approval, approved certain ;documents in implementation and execution of the Plan, htcludmg, vvithout limitations, an Assets Purchase Agreement (herein so called) to be entered into between Grantor, es seller, National Gypsum Company, a Delaware corporation formerly named New NOC, Inc. ('2jpl I, as buyer, and The Austin Company, an Ohio corporation; and .000005 That the Asses Purchase Agreement b attached as "Erhlleh E" to and made a part of the Findings of Feet and Conclusions ofLaw on Confirmation of the First Amended and Restated Joint Plan of Reorganization of National Gypsum Company and Aancor Holdings, . Inc. entered by the Chun on March 9,1993; and That as of the date hencof, Grantor and Grantee entered Into the Assets PmO Agreement; and That as of the date bereof, Grantor and Grantee commenced closing and consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Assets Purchase Agreement. Now, therefore, for and in consideration of the tam of TEN DOLLARS and other valuable consideration to the undersigned paid by Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acimowledged, and pursuant to Ser~'on 53(e) of the Punt. Section 1.1 of the Assets Purchase Agreement, and paragraph 6(a) of the Order, Grantor has GRANTED, SOLD, ASSIGNED, and CONVEYED, and by these presents does GRANT, SELL, ASSIGN, :tad CONVEY, without warranty (express orjimplied) except as expressly set forth below and subject to the Hailed to; Chicago Title Insurance Cora -;y Scean08 eboro, NO 27401 MAY �'6 S 1994 DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT 280= rN 1604 0012 r', Remaining Lens (as hereinafter defined), unto Grantee, I11 all that certain properly sit allied in New Hanover County, North Carolina, and more fully described in EKUWL1 altunccd herelo.and made a pan hereof for all purposes, and al all of Grantor's right, title and interest in, to and under that certain lease dated September 26,1980, as amended June 17, 3986, (the "jatiW), covering certain property more particularly described therein, by and between Grantor, as tenant, and Seaboard Coast Lne Ralkoad Company, a Virginia corporation, as landlord, a copy of which is attached hereto as j?a1dWLI and made a pan hereof for all purposes, the leasehold estate created by the Leese (the "(ea I fits") and the leasehold improvements located An or on the leasehold estate; together with W all buildings, structures, futures, and improvements located on the property described herein, LU any and all interests of Grantor in adjacent tracts of land, and id all interest, if any, of Grantor in strips or gores between the property described herein and abutting propcntes and any land lying.in or under the bed of any street, alley, road, or right-of-way, opened or proposed, abutting or adjacent to the property described bereln, rights, easements, and other interests appurtenant thereto, and the matters described on lhthiblt C attached hereto and made a part hereof for oil purposes {collectively, the ?lAwf11v'), and the conveyance of the Property hereby is being effected M free andclearof I& any mortgage, -Ben, pledge, charge, security interest, encumbrance, or other security device (Collectively, 'Lim"), Ili.! any tight of payment, or any tight to an equitable remedy for breach of performance if such breach gives rise to a right of.payment, from either Old NOC or Aancor, in either case whether such right is reduced to judgment, fixed, contingent, matured, uomatured, disputed, undisputed, secured, or unsecured (collectively, " aim s_°I Q any equity interest in Old NGC or Aancar represented by the common stock of Old NGC or Armour, and IM lfabilides, duties, obligations, eptioru, charges, Hans, security Interests, infringements, and other burdens, encumbrances and interests thereon or dereagaimt of whatever type or description, Including those of the kind specified in sections 502(g), (h),'and (I) -of the Bankruptcy Coda and preferential rights or rights of Ent refusal of any kind or nature whatsoever, whether direct or indirect, absolute or contingent, matured or unmatured, liquidated or unliquidated, oil by, or against Grantor or the Property (items listed in clauses I& through M are herein sometimes referred to collectively as the "Eueu Mances"), other than such Encumbrances to the extent affecting the Property and not otherwise resolved, released, avoided, or otherwise terminated pursuant to the Plan or by Pmal Order (as defined in the Plan) of the Court, including, without limitation, Lens on the Property securing Secured Claims (as defined in the Plan) (collectively, "R;lggjpj r.,a�°") and IM with respect to contracts or lanes assigned or transferred hereby, notwithstanding a provision In any contract or lease (Including, without limitation, mineral and gypsum deposit leaves) or any applicable law that Yiohibi% restricts or conditions the assignment or transfer of that contract or lease, Including ell preferential rights orrights of first refusal of any I., or nature whatsoever, pursuant to section 365(f) of the 6atdotrpicy.Code (provided that such prohibition. restriction or condition of assignment or transfer shall be negated only with respect to tramders and assignments effected. pursuant hereby or pursuant to the Asses Purchase Agreement and the other Plan Documents (as defined in the Plan) as contemplated by the Plan, and that such prohibitions, restrictions and conditions of assignment shall otherwise remain in full force and effect and a part of the contract or lease so assigned or transferred); provided, however, that the conveyance of the Properly effected 2 wr DIVISION O� CoASTAI- MANAGE�'�`IyT 100K PAGE 1609 0013 hereby specifically Is made without say representations or warranties to Grantee as to Grantoes rights, title, or Interests In or to the Property, except to the Moot expressly set forth bereloabove, and subject to such further disclaimers of warraotiet contained In Sections 4.1(a) and 4.1(b) of the Assets Purchase Agreement, which are fscorpuroted by reference herein and made a part hereof for all purposes, but with full substitution and subrogation of Grantee In and to all rights and actions of warranty that Gnator may have against all persons other than Austin or Its subsidiaries, the NGC Asbestos Settlement Fund, the Asbestos Committee, or the legal. Representative (each as defined In the Plan); and provided, further, however, that nothing contained herein shall be deemed a waiver of the rejection of soy unexpired lease or executory contract pursuant to the Plan or an assumption or affirmation by Grantee of any such unexpired lease or esecotory contract rejected ptusuaat to the Plan. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Props and appurtenances thereunto In anywise belonj forever, or, in the case of the Lease Rights ar remainder of the term mentioned in the Lease Grantor does hereby bind itself, its successors a DEFEND, all and singular the Property unto every person whomsoever lawfully claiming t provided, however, that, notwithstanding the demand with respect to any rights, title, or Intel limitation, any claim, cause of action, or deman clear of all Encumbrances other than Remain warranties of Grantor with respect to the Section 4.1(c) and 4.2 of the Assets Purchase. y, together with all and singular the rights IS unto Grantee, its successors and assigns such leasehold estate, for and during the ad any extensions or renewals thereof; and I assigns to WARRANT AND FOREVER aantee, Its successors and assigns, against to claim the same or any part thereof; megoing, any claim, cause of action, or as In or to the Property, Including, without for failure to deliver the Property free and g IJem, as well as arty representations or operty, shall be limfred as provided in Notwithstanding any other provision of this Deed, the rights and remedies of Grantee are limited in accordance with Sections .4.1(e) and Section 4.2 of the Most Purchase Agreement, which Sections are incorporated by refers act herein and made apart hereof for all purposes. The lease has been assumedAnd assigned pursuant to section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code. "Pursuant to Section 2.1(a)(d) of the Assets Purchase Agreement, Grantee has assumed all obligations of Grantor under the lease effective as of the effective date of this Deed The undertakings covenants and agreerr am contained herein shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the parties hereto,'and their respective successors, assigns and kgal representatives. . r!rE ' MAY DIVISION OF COASTAL M AMAGE'J' `Nj In witness whereof, Grantor has caused this ulsuument to he signed ul its t1muc by Its duly authorized officers and its seal Ill be llereunto Affixed by auth-11ny ��I ,I•. Board of Director , this JAI day of _�y _� 1993 to he eflective m 1-1 dw 1• rt day of —1 V 14 1993. GRANTOR: ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, it Delawprc corporation formerly named Notional Gypsum Company By. Name A i I t '<r Title: 1' e P President ATTEST: By: Lw M ct 00,E r4m7 Secretary STATE OF TEXAS 5 S COUNTY OF DALL4S 5 1, a Notary Public of the County and State aforesaid, certify that A II a,. v (d'r i ) personally came before me this day and aclmowledged that _ he is \l're .�;A^"*Seeretary of Asbestos Claims Management Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and that by authority duly given and as the act of the corporation, the foregoing Instrument was signe0.tn lu name by,lu ; r President, settled with its corporate seal and attested by a r i as Its Asia rw,vrSecretary, hand and official stamp or seal, thh Ism_ day of 1 . \ 1 19 L. h01111e rrR. Notary Pubita,�tate iff Texas My commission expires to • i 1-4 t. r\allnlsUDiNE\rtlQr��ca!Q�16x,��'. •�� A\ .y ,��'=\11� 1994 �r o!v�sio�y o� COASTAL MANAGEMENT STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA New Hanover County ' . W.Rwadnt / /utmaaddlaraalte W d Mvary aJdadal r�Earn/ antoWroO t96eepro�eL.//,/� 7La Lhalal,L dayct192 L •/� Nurawods, m�a, • 1 0 Z 191 538 494 i Receipt for. Certified Mail No Insurance Coverage Provided m® Do notusefor International Mail (See Reverse)] 2 Sent to 'Axe, cy, rti WA Seepyand0 tPPI� $ 1�.t�ltyd Fre CG t } +� I / o d 'Soerlal Day,'Day,6y Fee Retaliated DIM1N f `V Re tur 1p�i pV mg �i MIC (� to Delivered Retmn Receipt Sh i g to Mom, . Date. and Addrossce's AdMess TOTAL Pwwgs .r_. & Fee 3� Postmark or ?ate Z 151 538 493 Receipt for Certified Mail No Insurance Coverage Provided Do not use for International Mail (See Reverse) R splo c Svel and No. . T1 3416 1 P.O.. Swt0 anq ''t'L ' t •.' �. Demf / 0 'gPauai. i . �• ; Restricted DQIWN F080 \. Rewm R..'P, she m Whom & i�d Return Rwe M mg an whom. Done. and Addressee's Mamas TOTAL Postage & Feet Pssslmah .Oal !. � NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL TECI no I May 24, 1994 Ms. Tere Barrett NCDEHNR 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 28405-3845 Subject: National Gypsum Maintenance Dredging Wilmington, NC Dear Ms. Barrett: Please fmd enclosed a completed On behalf of National Gypsum ( application. Should you have any Thank you in advance for your as SHWih enclosure(s) Stan Project NQ 215061 a ;pr MAY 25 1993 DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT for CAMA pemrit pertaining to the subject site. ion, we respectfully request consideration of this is, please feel free to contact us at (910) 392-1747. in this matter. yours, ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES i e Geologist.z��� DIN 11„Y 1994 DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 295-AN. m PROJECT: THE MAINTENANCE DREDGING AROUND' THE SHIPPING BERTH OF THE NATIONAL. Gyp SUM PLANT ADJACENT TO THE GAPE FEAR RIVER AT THE JUNCTION OF SUNNYVALE DR, AND RI COMMENTS ACCEPTED THROUGH AITMI-ST 3- 1994 FOR MORE DETAILS CONTACT APPLICANT: THE LOCAL PERMIT OFFICER BELOW: NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANYTRRF,BARRETT DTV OF COASTAT MANAI M -Y 197 CARDINAL DRIVE EXTRNATDN 838 SUNNYVALE DRIVE NC 28405 WILMINGTON NC Z8412 WILMINGTON, 910/395-3900 1/ , j- N Please type or print. Carefully describe all anticipated development activities, including construction, excava- tion, filling, paving, land clearing, and stormwater con- trol. If the recjuested information is not relevant to your project, write N/A (not applicable). Items 14 and 8.9 must be completed for all projects. 1 APPLICANT a. Name NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY Address 838 SUNNYVALE DRIVE City WTI myh,-r.Tne; State NORTH CAROLINA Zip 28412 Dayphone (910) .799-3954 XX _Landowner ol Authorized agent b. Project name Cif any). SHIP BERTHING AREA MAINTENANCE DREDGING c. If the applicant is not the landowner, also give the owner's name and address. LANDOWNER OF SPOIL• AREA: U.S ARMY rnRps np FNn TNFFRS P.O.Rnx 1 Rgt1 WI; MrNaTnN. NncTw rARnt tNA 7RU1 2 LOCATION OF PROPOSED PROJECT ' a Street address or secondary road number 838 SUNNYVALE DRIVE b. City, town, community, orlandmark It mjmsyaN NORTH Caw ma c. County NEW HANOVER/BRUNSWICK d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction? YFc e. Name of body of water nearestpro ect CAPE FEAR RIVER (FOURTH AST JETTY RANGE 3 DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED use OF PROPOSED PROJECT a Describe all development activities you propose (for example, building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, or pier). DREDGING OF A SHIP BERTHING AREA A SO QPP NARRATTVF nF4rRT21TnN ATTAr NFD If you plan to build a marina, also complete and attach Form DCM-MP-2. b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? .. . MAINTENANCE c. Will the project be for community, private, or commercr use? rFRIVATE d. DescribetheplanneduseoftheprojecL EXISTING DOCK. ' -41 L 4 LAND AND WATER Ul 25 1994 CHARACTERISTICS DIVISION OF a Size of entire tract 91.418OR&MAL MANAGEMENT b. Size of individuallot(s) N/A c. Elevation of tract above mean sea level or National Geodetic Vertical Datum 0'-15' d. Vil type(s) and texture(V of tract f(l4PPEd gANSpIbROVAN MID KURE B ON SOIL SURVEY MAP e. Sege�tatononntractCLAYS) OAK, PINE ANn IMMATURE Wnnnl ANDS. WFTt ANp4 AI a RTVFR FRTNr;: f. Man=made features now on tract RECIEVING HOPPER AND DOCK. g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan Classification of the site? (Consult the local land use plan.) Conservation _Transitional =Developed _Community _Rural _Other IL How isth Adlocave�pt? VA R SPOIL AREA: KU IKURALI i. How -are adjacent waters classified? SC j. Hasa professional archaeojtrgical survey been carriedout for the tract? IIVVOO"" If so, by whom? 3191 az f. Dimensions of spoil disposat Wea C. APPROXTMATFIV 6,000' Rv I,g00 ' I_ g. Location of spoil disposal area IE ARM IRPS nr: Fnir,TN. d. GDVERNN�NT DISPDSAL AREA ON som END of a0 ID h Do you claim tide to the disposal area? No e' If not, attach a letter granting permission from the Owner- ATTACHED £ I. Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance? YES If so, where? SAMF AR ARnvF Shoreline erosiwi during preceding 12 months, in Type of bulkhead material N/A _ Amount of fill, in cubic yards, to be placed below meanhighwater N/A Type of fill material 8 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION j. Does the disposal area include any marshland, In addition to the completed application form, the follow - swamps, or water areas? ing items must be submitted:. Mn k. Willthe ftll material be placed below mean high water? No 1. Amount of fill in cubic yards. paanv B - 900 in. Type offillmaterial SILT AND SAND .n. Source of fill material DREDGE SPOILS o. Will fill material be placed on marsh or other wetlands? D18 p. Dimensigp;Aof the wetland to be filled q. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site I and erosion controlled? DTKn Amp STTr I TNF RASTNR r. What type of construction equipment will be used (for example dragline, bahoe,pr hydraulic dredge)? HYDRAULIC DREDGE I L Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project site? No If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen environmental impacts. I I I 7 SHORELINE STABILIZATION a Length of bulkhead orriprap N/A Average distance watetward of mean high water or nomtalwaterlevel N/A I I 3/91 A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims tide to the affected property. If the applicant is not claiming to be the owner of said property, then forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under which the owner claims tide, plus written permission f rom.the owner to carry out the project An accurate work plat (including plan view and cross . sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black ink on an 8 1/2 x 11 white paper. (Refer to Coastal Resources Commission Rule 73.0203 for a detailed description.) Please note that original drawings are preferred and only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue -line prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if 18 high quality copies are provided by applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site. Include county road (SR) numbers, landmarks, and the like. A stormwater management plan, if applicable, that may have been developed in consultation with the Division of Environmental Management. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners. These Individuals have 30 days in which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management and sho a Gtsg' Q lj- {he ppli t of that opportunity. DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT 3 W 3a. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE OF PROPOSED PROJECT This area was initially dredged in 1975 when a berthing area, dock, and associated materials handling equipment were installed on site. In 1987, due to sediment infilling, the berthing area was again dredged to return it to initial design specifications. Dredging is now required as sediment has once again filled the area. Attached, along' with the completed application form, are the following: 1. Location Map (showing site & spoil disposal area) 2. Site Maps (site and spoil disposal area) 3. A current bathymetric .map '13 4. Appropriate dock and dike sections �• ° 5. Property Deed 6. Disposal Area Agreement piVi iv . OF COASTAL .ly;Ai4AGEMEM The boat basin was originally designed to be 34' in depth, plus P overdraft. In order to return the area to design specifications, calculations were derived from the bathymetric map and show that an estimated 5,200 cubic yards of material needs to be removed from the boat basin, and an additional 3,000 cubic yards from the surrounding area to achieve a 4-to-1 bottom gradient. The excavation will be accomplished via hydraulic dredge. Dredge spoil will be disposed in the U Disposal Area on the south end of Eagle on site- thereafter, the area would not accc in the Government Disposal Area, and. w.( in this same area. The Government Dis capacity measuring in excess of 2.5 mfllio Area contains accessory dikes and settle reduced copy of a plat for the spoil dispi NET or, COE. The following actions will be taken to dredging: Army Corps of Engineers' (COE) Government land. During the 1975 project, spoil was disposed modate additional spoil. In 1987, spoil was placed tow propose to dispose of the newly dredged spoil isal Area is readily accessible from the site, with cubic yards. In addition, the Government Disposal :nt basins needed for effective spoil disposal. A al area is included; a large copy is available from the adverse environmental impact of hydraulic 1) The terminus of the influent dredge pipe will be positioned at a minimum of 70' from the dikes to prohibit dike damage land to allow settlement of suspended solids. 2). Effluent from the dike area will dike and the water, and will di water. contained by piping over the vegetation between the arge into the river at a point at or below mean low M rl" 3) Dredging activities will be conducted between October 1 and March 30 to protect juvenile shrimp and fin fish populations. Routine channel maintenance dredging is conducted in this area by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; every effort will be made to employ dredging contractors who are already in operation in the area. It is anticipated that maintenance to this project will need to be performed toutinely; therefore, National Gypsum Company is requesting that a maintenance clause be included in this permit for a period of ten years (through December 31, 2004). J41�F lr(tY r _ 1994- DIVISION OF CONSTAL MANAGEi` ENT rlN ATTACHMENT I LOCATION MAP MAY 1994 DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT r�l ATTACHMENT 2 SiTE MAPS J994 DIVISION OF COASTAL NIANAGWENT 9,oA CAPE REAR RIVER APPROX. MEAN -LOW WATER LINE 'APPROX. MEAN -HIGH WATER LINE. An i i O I;< CONVEYOR & AC' APPROX. EXTENT OF i 404 WETLANDS CESS/ O f0 < 1 ! ROAD CAUSWAY ' � O O / EXXON PROPERTY �. 1 PR—RTY L,y O �, ` ROCK STORAGE / ATI�ENVIRONMENTA ECNNOLOGIESJNC. Wilmington, NC I]I,YI�SIO 1 OF COASTAL P+IANAVENIENT NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION INFORMATION ONLY. DRAWING SCALE IS APPROXIMATE. 0 300 600 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 APPROX. SCALE (FT'.) S. HARTS ' NATIONAL GYPSUM H K. FAIRCLOTH Charlotte, North Carolina KEo . Gold Bond Building Products )Jr."S Site Ma SCALE dFNUJLCT NO. SHT. No. REV.. 1/,18/94 NOTED 215001 215-1C01 0 L-D'. EAGLE 1)I)SI`AND � UiSi'USriL AREA (SOUTH) ��''.�� `tfti>.tutuuttttvtt -- _-______—___—_____ CAPE ffnH RIPER '-` —� _ W ..PO CN[ ILM RMW14 e.ILR - _ _ B_-- ------------ B O CONTRACT MAP (: Z) NOTES. _ HCRIZGNiGL GAILPI NGG 1427 O z -1.-..- y o7 _}"- -�--- _. t o -n A R`--" 11 i I ��c o'o a Y A m m YILYINGTGN HARBOR.NC A 41GLC ISLAND 45GUi%1 • O�env CISPMAL AREA LOCATION NAP ��J 5 4 3 2 .. It CD �� ° `P e - �• BRUNSWICK RIVER D � D wury^ ' WO.� c/� �):r.l n.Ynrum \ a a i G• // � p - GJ � � \ -3- —e ----e —e- a .° 4'.{ - � [ [�p�•.'�T e . ...aE e L c e e a e t a e — pa e ea e e •.. p� • R e e e e e L ! -e a e e e e 1 t l♦ a � e p, e e ° �[[ s s[ s s[ a_ACT MA_P_ e n e i\. _RMc — ♦ rwsr. ______ _ --------------- _ uewor. IJLLF r41.r.ND °IfPOSLL APLi --- — -- .... -- -- -- ....._................. CAPE FEAR RIVER �. ---- — — — ... r — - - -- - -- --_____ _ _ _____ LL— w r*l ATTACHMENT 3 BATI-I[YMETRIC MAP I Dr.i MAY 1994 DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGENUENT APl'i-,v.{. NORTH •-42.9 42.9 0 -43.0 0 -43.2 0 -43.3 0 -44.3 0 -41.6 0 -42.7 • -42.9 44.0 4Y•9 43.0 41.7 -41.7 0 -42.9 , 0 -39 8 •-41.7 0-42.1 = •-43.4 0-44.4 • ' FOURTH EAST JETTY RANGE , -42.9 43.0 42.1 -40.3 41.4 -40.7 42.9 -40.3 40.7 = 0 = 0 •-41.7 • 9-41.9 0 0 EBB FLOOD -39.0 � -39.6 -40.8 -42.1 39.2 -38.3 -39.1 -39.7 0 0-39.8 -37.9 -37.6 0-39.1 � 0 • AREA TO BE DREDGED_ -36.0-35.9 -36.0 -35.0 -37.9 0-37.9 0-36.3 0-36.3 -36.7 0 -37.8 0 -36.9 0 •-35.9 0 .. _. L 'Y t . Y� i .:. fit- l L J• f 5 27 3 21.9 Zt 2�c9 • 2�'Or •�2%'D,a t y4,rr'1 �.,•"n�03 � :�� • rj `:. �y229 ___... .... - DOLPHIN Nurrtm N NOTES T 1. DRAWING PREPARED FROM INFORMATION PROVIDED BY r < =< NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. SIZE OF WALKWAYS/HOOPER CONVEYOR & � U) MAY BE APPROXIMATIONS ONLY. WALKWAY 2. DEPTH MEASUREMENTS IN FEET BELOW MEAN LOW WATER (MLW) PROVIDED BY STUART Y. BENSON & ASSOCIATES, R.L.S. I I rrn O a 3. DEPTH MEASUREMENT SYMBOL • 9�: rn I �2/1/94I PRELIMINARY Wllfilln t00, NC APPROX. SCALE (1"=60') .0 30_ 60 S I I I CLIENT/TITLE NATIONAL GYPSUM Charlotte, North Carolina Maintenance Dredging Permit Bathymetric Map PROJECT NO. I SHEET NO, REV. 215001 215-1 CO2 I A W (ON ATTACHMENT 4 DOCK AND DIKE SECTIONS DATE' PIERHEAD LINE 11y_p•• 400' CHAI MEAN SEA LEVEL (0.0) 4 30, EL, —35.0' PROPOSED BERTHING AREA — UKLUL,INL, IP SCALE: l 1" = 40' 12' x 12' RECEIVING HOPPER BELT CONVEYORI& - TRUSS I II 50— CTRS, ^� STEEL "W PILING (TYPICAL) NC it 11 ii !I II 11 ROCK STORAGI SCALE: 1" = 40' DESIGNED S. HARTS DRAWN K. FAIRCL �l tl��ir� e , t E tihi 1`v DiV'ISI:Ctd OF COASTAL is NIAGE1.4ENT MEAN HIGH WATER 2 MEAN SEA LEVEL (0.0) -MEAN LOW WATER -1.2' NATIONAL GYPSUM Charlotte, North Carolina Gold Bond Building Products Misc. Conveyor & D�noefallsZDJECT NO. S215001 PIERHEAD LINE 115'-0 ,.. I(400' CHANN MEAN SEA LEVEL (0.0) _ 1 - 38,I , L- 4 30' EL. -35A' PROPOSED BERTHINGAREA TYPICAL SECTION - DREDGING iN CAPE FEAR RIVER ' SCALE:11" = 40' ' 12' x 12' RECEIVING HOPPER - BELT CONVEYOR]& TRUSS — Ir �I� III 50' CTRS. STEEL "R' PILING (TYPICAL) 11 II 11 ROCK STORAGI SCALE: V = 40' I. >; 199A DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT 1 MEAN HIGH WATER 2.8' MEAN SEA LEVEL (0.0) ' MEAN LOW WATER -1.2' I DESIGNED CLIENT/TITLE ' I S. HARTS NATIONAL GYPSUM DRAWN Charlotte, North Carolina NATIONAL L'�NVIRDNMENTAL ECHNOLOGIES.INC. K. FAIRCL07H ' NEW Gold Bond Building Products I /dt Misc. Conveyor & Dred In Details PROJECT N0. SIiT- No. DATE SCALE REY. Wilmington, NC 2 1a 94 NOTED 215001 215-1C04 A DESCRIPTION 0 I5/94 I ISSUED W/REPORT FOURTH EAST JETTY RANGE — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -----CL CHANNEL FL—_—o _... �� . 4-111p- N PLAN VIEW — SCALE 1"=200' IC'. DISPOSAL AREA EFFLUENT PIPE LOCATED AT OR BELOW MEAN LOW WATER & WILL EXTEND OVER WETLANDS. . I . MHW RIVER DIKE AROUND SPOIL AREAS TO PREVENT WASHBACK OF SPOIL MATERIAL 20. EXISTING . GROUND 3 TYPICAL DIKE SECTION SCALE DESIGNED S. HARTS DRAWN NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES,INC. I K. FAIRCLOTH CHEC�ED� I _L n, NC ,•r�rr `,JJ SPII�LWA.rRII'.�=TERA11NkT2''EN OF PIP INSIDE STILLING BASIN TO ALLOW SETTLEMENT OF SUSPECTED SOLIDS. STILLING BASIN NATIONAL GYPSUM Charlotte, North Carolina Gold Bond Building Products Misc. Dock Details 215— a 0 15/94 1 ISSUED W/REPORT FOURTH EAST JETTY RANGE — — fL CHANNEL — — — — — — - �1-� N � SHIP BASIN � EBB FLOOD �N .— — CHANNEL LINE — — — BRESTING DOLPHINS 1 90. —._ — � I. PIE — — LINE C.1111---------I DOCK W/RECEIVING HOPPER ' MOORING MOORING DOLPHIN SHIP UNLOADING DOLPHIN CONVEYOR 8451I _55'I_EXISTING _EXXONA Nlv PLAN VIEW e,[I SCALE 1"=200' .IIII fU4d DISPOSAL AREA EFFLUENT PIPE LOCATED DIVISION OF 'AT OR BELOW MEAN LOW W TER ScWILL EXTEND OVER WETLANDS. P COASTAL. MANAGEMENT MHW DIKE AROUND SPOIL AREAS TO TIWASHDACK OF SPOILIL MATERIAL SPILLWAY PIPE — TERMINATE END OF MAT PIPE INSIDE STILLING BASIN TO ALLOW SETTLEMENT OF SUSPECTED SOLIDS. 20'I (MINI) 3 1' STILLING BASIN RIVER TRF I L EXISTING; GROUND TYPICAL DIKE SECTION SCALE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL TECIINOLOGIES.INC. CUENT/TITLE NATIONAL GYPSUM Charlotie, • North Carolina Gold Bond Building Products Misc. Dock Details Wilmington, NC. t 6 ti m ATTACHMENT 6 DISPOSAL AREA AGREEMENT j)1,v:sl!o'Vl or COASTAL VVNI f. PGEIAENT 0 N DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 1890 WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402.1690 May 12, 1994 IN REPLY REFER Navigation Branch Mr. Stan H. Harts National Environmental Technologies, Inc. 301-A N. Green Meadows Drive Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Dear Mr. Harts: This is in response to your letter dated April 25, 1994, requesting permission to place approximately 8,200 cubic yards of dredge material within the Government disposal area at the South end of,Eagle Island. Permission is granted to place the dredge material within the Government disposal area provided the following. requirements are met prior to placement of the dredge material. a. Approval of the location of the pipeline. b. No other ongoing use of the disposal area. c.. Payment of $.10 per cubic yard. If we can be of further assistance to you, -please do not hesitate to call us. Since ely, Caarr�mihne F ci ni to jj ! t, s'.. %" ' •, I'; s ac Chief, Navigation Branca plhy : 1994 D1V1810 d OF COASTAL MAI\',AOE1°"yT Permit Class t RENEWAL STATE OF NORTH.CAROLINA MAINTENANCE 5 Department of Environment -and Natural Resources and Coastal Resources Commission for. X Major Development in an Area of Environmental Concern pursuant toNCGS113A418:' . X Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229 Issued to National Gypsum Company, 838 Sunnwale Drive, Wilmington, NC 28412 Permit Number authorizing development in New Hanover County at _ the Cape Fear River at the junction of Sunny-. vale Dr. & River Road , as requested in the permittee's application dated letter dated 1/8/9& This pemrit, issued on D — \ t — C\ t , is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and.notes set forthbelow. Any violation of these terms may be subject to a fine, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and void. This permit renewal must be attached to the Amended original of Permit No. 102-94 issued on September 14, 1994 and both documents must be readily available on site when a Division Representative inspects the project for compliance. All conditions and stipulations of the or. ginal permit remain in force under this renewal. Maintenance Clause The Division of Coastal Management will be notified in writing at le"�epsliti?� igvti�e of any maintenance work authorized by this permit and that notification inclu3iei� A. the number of the original permit. Er (See attached sheet for Additional Conditions) t l�;tj D'� This permilLaction may be appealed by the permittee or other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the issuing date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work ' initiation or continuance, as the case may be. This pemtit must be accessible on -site to Department personnel when the project is inspected for compliance. Any maintenance work or project modification not covered hereunderrequires further Departmental approval. All work must cease when the permit expires on December 31, 2002 _ In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees that your project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal Management Program. Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DEHNR.and the Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission. -,Ytv- Roger N. checter, Director Division of Coastal Management This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted. Signature of Permittee National Gypsum Company ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS Permit #102-94 Page 2 of 2 . B. a statement that no dimensional changes are proposed. C. a copy of the original permit plan(s) with cross -hatching indicating the area to be maintained, the area to be used for spoil, and the estimated amount of material to be removed. D. the date of plan revision and the permittele's signature shown anew on the original plan. �4, lj i.si�Jt, Jr CO3p,,STQL MAIIA-,*- erac DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF "ENGINEERS RO. BOX 1890 WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 284o2.189a March 16, 1998 IN REPLY REFER TO Regulatory Division Action ID No. 199403672 and State Permit National Gypsum Company 838 Sunnyvale Drive Wilmington, North Carolina 28412 Dear Sir: No. 3,02� _ MAR 181998 DIVISIr1NI OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT Through coordination with the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management, we have learned of your request to perform maintenance work and renew your State Permit. The Department of the Army permit issued September 23, 1994, authorized maintenance of a ship's berth on the Cape Fear River, Wilmington Harbor, New Hanover County, North Carolina: Your proposal continues to be consistent with the provisions .and objectives of General Permit No. 198000291. Therefore, the permit is modified to include the requested maintenance work and renewed with -an expiration date of December 31, 2002. It is understood 'that all conditions of the original permit remain applicable. Questions or comments may be addressed to the undersigned, available at telephone (910) 251-4636. Sincerely, Jeffrey H. Richter Project Manager Wilmington.Field Office I Copies Furnished: Mr. John Parker Division of Coastal Management North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Post Office Box 27687 Raleigh, North Carolina 27,611 Mr. C. Robert Stroud, Jr., District Manager A/Wilmington Regional Office U North Carolina Division of Coastal Management 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, North Carolinal 28405-3845 State of North Carolina Department of Environri,_;it' and Natural Resources 0 Wilmington Regionaf Office^^ Division of Coastal Management James 8. Hunt, Jr., Governor NCDENR Wayne McDevitt, Secretary .. .. _ _ ..__ NORJM CAReuNA, DEPARTMENT OF -- Roger N. Schecter, Director ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCEs TO: John Parker Permits Section, DCM i FROM: E. F. Brooks Field Representative, DCM THROUGH: C. Robert Stroud, Jr District Manager; Wilmington,;DCM DATE: 1/8197 SUBJECT: Request for si ��af of�'g i ]? National Gypsum Co. The applicants are requesting renewal of their on the Cape Fear River. The permittee is reque,, at this time. I have no objection to the req conditions, including applicable moratorium notification prior to any work, be incorporate 127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, N.C. An Equal Oppon ermit for maintenance dredging of their terminal facility ing a 5 year renewal of the permit. No work is proposed est and recommend the continuance of existing permit lates, spoils area inspection, and a mandatory two week into the permit conditions. D5-3845 • Telephone 910.395.3900 • Fax 910-3504004 Affirmative Action Employer NATIONAL ? :;WZNRENTAL A,ECffiYOLOGTS, wc, L ervrs:oly or COASTAL MAI4PAGEMENT _ December 23,.1997 .__ . _ Project N215008 Mr. Ed,Biooks NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Coastal Management (DCM) Wilmington Regional Office 127Cardinal Drive F--*nsion Wilmington, North Carolina 28dO5-3845 I SUBJECT: Request for Conversion to Maintenance Permit National Gypsum Company Wilmington, North Carolina Coastal Area Management'Act (CAMA) Permit Number 102-94 Dear Mr. Brooks: On behalf of our client, National Gyps I Company, National Environmental Technologies, Inc. (NET) is hereby requesting that the subject CAMA permit be renewed and converted to a five-year maintenance permit. The original permit . was issued on August 30, 1994, and expires on December 31, 1997. This permit allows National Gypsum Company to dredge and maintain the ship berthing area used to off-load gypsum onto its existing dock. Enclosed is National Gypsum Company�s $30 application fee to cover the processing of this request. . A Bathymetric survey of the ship berthing area was conducted in October 1997. NET will review this survey in December 1997 - 7 II ry 1998, to determine if and when maintenance dredging activities will be necessary to return the ship berthing area to original design specifications. As stated in National Gypsum's CAMA permit application, dated May. 16, 1994, every effort will be made to employ dredging contractors who may already be in operation in the area. 295-A N. Green Meadows Drive • Wdmimron, NC 28405 - (910) 392-1747IFAX (910) 392-8654 W Mr. Ed Brooks NCDENR-DCM December 23, 1997 ' Page 2 This request_,for a five-year_ maintenance.. permit _is with the understanding, that.all..basin . . maintenance activities will be in accordance with the conditions and engineering drawings contained in Permit No, 102-94, . Specifically, the excavation will not exceed thirty-five (35) feet below the elevation of mean low water (MLW). All other "Excavation and Filling" and "Additional Conditions" contained in said permit will be observed. Please do not.hesitate to contact us at (910) 392-1747 if you have any questions regarding this letter or require additional information for permit renewal. Thank you for your timely consideration of this matter. Sincerely, NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ?Jnnoe M. Beres En inehelring ErpjectMa pa�ger Stan H. Harts Geology Project Manager Pag- d. , enclosure cc: Bill Dungan (National Gypsum Company - Wilmington) Steven Miller, P.E. (National Gypsum Company - Charlotte) NUV. -I& US ITUhI 11 : 19 UI iNK UUNTAL MUM' 11L:919 160 1490 r, UUL Permit Class MODMICATION/MINOR STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA Department of Enviionment and Natural Resources and Coastal Resources Commission -Permit for % Major Development in an Area of Environmental Concern pursuant to NCGS 113A-118 Permit Number 10-514 X Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229 Issued tti ja � j�t{ny=838 Sunnyvale Drive, Wiimhotoa, NC 28412 Authorizing development in I+li*'iiald iib9dii County at the Cane Fear River at thq innetion of Sunnyvale Dr & R;v r Rd._ , as requested in the parmittee,a application dated letter dated 91, 6103. This permit, issued on _- November), 11(114 is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may be subject to fines, imprisonment or civil action; or maycause the permit to be null and void. 1) This minor modification authorizes an inc low water level. throughout the project Wilmington Harbor Deepening project. in the depth of excavation to -44 feet below the normal to parallel the depths of the federally .maintained 2) This minor modification must be attached to the Amended original of permit No. 102.94, which was issued on 9114/94, as well as all subsequent renewals, and all documents must be readily available on site when a Division representative inspects the project for compliance. 3) All conditions and stipulations of the active permit remain in force under this minor modification unless altered herein. This permit action may be appealed by the perminea Other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the issui date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work initiation continuance ns the case may be. This permit must be accessible on -site to Departmt personnel when the project is inspected for compliance. Any maintenance work or project modification not cover hereunder requires further Division approval. All work must cease when the permit expires on t,-ecernber 31, 2007 issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees thntyour project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal Management Program. Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DENR and'the Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission. v Do is D. Moffitt Director . Division of Coastal Management This para,ie and its conditions arc hereby accepted. Signature of Permiuee OR ENT 0 OF.� da�.� Ftwr- y ;Q •L2tf�.t t�ttS of P��P4 � Regulatory Division DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 1890 WILMINGTON. NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890 January 23, 2004 Action ID No. 199403672 and State Permit No.102-94 National Gypsum Company 838 Sunnyvale.Drive Wilmington, North Carolina 28412 Dear Madam or Sir: ,, I , T COASTAL iv1ANAGEMENT Through coordination with the North; Carolina Division of Coastal Management,. we have learned of your request to modify your Department of the Army (DA) permit issued on December September 23, 1994, which authorized the maintenance of a ship's berth on the Cape Fear River, Wilmington Harbor, New Hanover County; North Carolina. The modification consists of increasing the dredging depth to —44 feet below the normal low water level throughout the project area to parallel the depths of the federally maintained Wilmington Harbor Deepening project. Your proposal continues to be consist' ent with the provisions and objectives of general permit No. 198000291: The permit is hereby modified. It is'understood that all other conditions of your permit remain applicable and that the expiration date is December 31, 2007. If you have any questions or commepIts you may call me at (910) 251-4930. Henry Wicker, Project Manager Wilmington Regulatory Field Office L Copies Furnished: Chief, Source Data Unit NOAA/National Ocean Survey ArITN: Sharon Tear N/CS261 1315 East-West Hwy., Rm. 7316 Silver Spring, MD 20910-3282 Mr. Doug Huggett Division of Coastal Management North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1638 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638 1 Mr. Jim Gregson, District Manager Wilmington Regional Office North Carolina Division of Coastal Management 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, North Carolina 28405-3845 2 n -h 17 c 'tip tv.:aE:1vIENT ej, NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Coastal Management Michael F. Easley, Governor Donna D. Moffitt, Director William G. Ross Jr., Secretary MEMORANDUM T0: Doug Huggett DCM - Major Permits FROM: Jason Di l DCM - ' gton THRU: Jim Gregson RE: Minor Modification, Permit National Gypsum Co. New Hanover County DATE:. September 24, 2003 The applicant has submitted the enclosed plans ri permitted dredging depth at the National Gypsum The modification is necessary to update the facilii federal Wilmington Harbor Deepening Project. Facilities in 2000 (State Permit #47-87). Check #2200, in the amount of $100.00, has been sting.a modification to their existing permit to increase the ship basin, adjacent to the Cape Fear River, in Wilmington. match the new excavation depths (-44 ft.) authorized by the filar actions were authorized to update the NC State Port to cover the permit extension and minor modification. At this time, the Wilmington Regional Office has no objection to this modification request. The existing permit conditions will have to be changed to reflect the changes in the nature of the project Thank you for this opportunity to comment. s:\cama\jasonWiinorMods\NatiorWOpy.Sept03 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, North Carolina 28405-3845 Phone: 910-395-3900\Fax: 910-350-2004 \ Internet httpJ/dcm2.enr.state.nc.us An Equal Opportunity \ Affioative AcUiwl Employer- 50% Recycled XIG% Post Consumer Paper '" -'-- "'-' 'tea"-'•"'„- U:1KT VKtGYt trvuliYCgK HAUL e2 J GA.RY GREENE E N G t N 'E E R S Post CTtt -2 Box 99213 RAuicx, NORTH CAROLINA 27624-921.3 AEA 919-855-M88 ' Fax 919.855-8489 E-MAIL' CKOMENt:•@a GARYGREENE-r3NC1NEEtS.COM nr_srr.H MANAfF.ilF cMl, r211+irnRTAn7N ruuxrnr: MAHflRfE STRUC IMUL September 16, 2003 Jason Dail Division of Coastal Management NC Department of Environmental and Natural Resources 127 Cardinal Drive Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Subject Minor Modification Request of National Gypsum Company CAMA permit 102,94 Dear Mr. Dail: Gary Greene Engineers'onbehalfofNationalGypsumCompany, requests aminormodiftcationof their CAMA permit 102-94 to increase the dredge depth authorized for the terminal. With the adjacent Corps of Engineers channel authorized and dredged to a depth of 42 feet mean lower low water(yQ L W) plus an oirerdredge allowance oft feet (total depth of-44 MLLW ), National Gypsum Company requests an increase in depthtoaccommodatevesselsnavigatingthecbaanel. Specifically, we request tbatthe depth indicated in note 2) ofthe permit be increased from 35 feet to -42 MLL W plus an overdtedge allowance of 2 feet for a total depth.of -44 MLLW. Wd trust that this correspondence is sufficient for the modification. However, if you have any questions or need additional in please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Gary K. Greene cc: Stephen Miller, National Gypsum Company L NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Coastal Management Michael F, Easley, Governor Donna D. Moffitt, Director William G. Ross Jr., Secretary MEMORANDUM TO: Doug Huggett DCM - Major Permits FROM: Jason Dail DCM - Wi gton THRU: Jim Gregson 6�) L RE: Minor Modification, Permit National Gypsum Co. New Hanover County DATE: September 24, 2003 The applicant has submitted the enclosed plans ri permitted dredging depth at the National Gypsum The modificaion is necessary to update the facili- federal Wilmington Harbor Deepening Project. Facilities in 2000 (State Permit #147-87). Check #2200, in the amount of S 100.00, has been sting.a. modification to their existing permit to increase the ship basin, adjacentto the Cape Fear River, in Wilmington. match the new excavation depths (44 ft.) authorized by the ilar actions were authorized to update the NC State Port to cover the permit extension and minor modification. At this time, the Wilmington Regional Office has no objection to this modification request. The existing permit conditions will have to be changed to reflect the changes in the nature of the project. Thank you for this opportunity to comment. s:\cama\jasonlMinotgods\NationalGpy.Sept.03 127 Cardinal Drive Ext Phone:910-395-3900\Fax: .on, North Carolina 28405-3845 Internet: httpJldcm2.enr.state.nc.us' An Equal Opportunity \ Al0ripative Acllos Employer- 50% Recycled \[D% Post Consumer Paper d911b/LF7tlJ 13::11 9198558489 GARY GREENE ENGINEER PAGE 02 GARY GREENE E N G ,1 N E E R 5 POST OFFICE Box 99213 R2ALEIGH, NORTH C:AROLINA 27624-9213 USA 919-855-8488 , FAX919-855.8489 E-MAIL: GKGREENE[tla GARYGREF.NE-FNCiNEERS.(VM A"IrN xidmr . r�� r. C1Vil, T1NA6rrRTnn?N MnRftlMS .c7RUCTUIL2L September 16, 2003 Jason Dail Division of Coastal Management NC Department of Environmental and Natural Resources 127 Cardinal Drive Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Subject. Minor Modification Request of National Gypsum Company CAMA Permit 102-94 Dear Mt. Dail: Gary Greene Engineers, on behalf ofNational their CAMA permit 102-94 to increase the i adjacent Corps of Engineers channel authoriz water (MLLW) plusan overdredge allowance Company requests an increase in depth to acco: we request that the depth indicated in note 2) c Plus an overdredge allowance of 2 feet for a t We trust that this correspondence is suf questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Gary K. Greene cc: Stephen Miller, National. Gypsum ypsum Company, requests a minor'modif cation of Age depth authorized for the terminal. With the and dredged to a depth of -42 feet mean lower low Z feet (total depth of-44 MLLW), National Gypsum nodatevesselsnavigadngthechannel. Specifically, he permit be increased from 35 feet to -42 MLLW d depth of-44 MLLW. for the modification. However, if you have any do not hesitate to contact me. Jason, Attached is check for minor mod for National Gypsum and Hess Oil. Waiting to here from Colonial (say they are interested but need authorization to deepen). Please provide receipts individually for each terminal (1 for Hess & 1 for National Gypsum). i Gary Greene E Gary Greene Engineers U'D vT PO Box 99213 n Raleigh NC 27624 Il j CEP 2 3 2003 919-855-8488 DIVISIOiV OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT National®®® Gypsum COMPANY May 2, 2003 Ed Brooks Division of Coastal Management NC Department of Environmental and Natural resources 127 Cardinal Drive Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Corporate OKces: 2001 ftdord Road Chaddde, NO 28211 704-365-7300 Subject: Renewal of National Gypsum Company LAMA Permit 102-94 Dear Mr. Brooks: Attached is a signed copy of the s work to expire on December 31, 2 permit renewal and its conditions. Sincerely, 1 l` Stephen M. Miller, P.E. National Gypsum Company Technical Resources Phone 704.365.7268 Fax 704.365.7316 smmiller(a) nation algypsum. com ed permit renewal extending permitted National Gypsum Company accepts this I cc: Steve LePage — NGCo. WLM Pit Mgr Gary Greene — Gary GreenelEngineers ECEIVE MA ?D03 1. DIV.GC ASI SION. OF ALMANAGEMENT 307919 Permit Class 214D RENEWAL MAINTENANCE 5 STATE Olt' NORTH CAROLINA Department of Environment and Natural Resources and Coastal Resources Commission ermtt- for X Major Development in an Area of Environmental Concern pursuant to NCGS 113A-118 X Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229 Issued to Authorizing development in New Hanover 3�innyvale Dr. Rim r Rd. , as requested Permit Number 102-W _County at the Cane Pear River at the junction of the permittee's application dated letter dated 2125103, This permit, Issued on _April 21. 2003 1 , is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may be subject -to fines, imprisonment or civil action; or tray cause the permit robe null and void. 1) This renewal must be attached to the Amended original of Permit No, 102-94, which was issued on 9/14/94 and subsequently renewed on 2/18/98, and all documents must be readily available on site when a Division representative inspects the project for compliance, All conditions and stipulations of the active permit remain in force under this renewal. (See attached This permit action may be Appealed by the perm other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the date, An Appeal requires resolution prior to work iaidi continuance Its the case may be. This permit must be accessible on site to Dep Personnel when the project is inspected for compliance. Any maintenance work or project modification not i hereunder requires further Division approval, All work must ceaso when the permit aspires on December 31, 2007 :t for Addidotial Conditions) or Signed by the authority of credry of nd & nog Chairman of the Coastal Resources Cotlyt/'Migt'.ON OF C COASTAL MANAGEMP In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees at your project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal MAnegementprogram. vH � na D. Moffitt, Director Division of Coastal Management This permit And if, conditions are hereby accepted. Signature National Gypsum Company Permit #102-94 Page 2 of 2 ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS Maintenance Clause 2) The Division of Coastal Management, Wilmington District Office, shall be notified in writing at least two (2) weeks in advance of any maintenance work authorized by this permit, and such notification shall include: A. The number of the original permit. B. A statement that no dimensional changes are proposed. C. A copy of the original permit plans with cross -hatching indicating the area to be maintained, the area to be used for spoil disposal, and the estimated amount of material to be removed. The location, design and holding capacity of the spoil disposal site must be approved by a representative of the Division prior to the initiation of any maintenance dredging activities. D. The- .dato.o€map.revisson:and the..peimittee's signature shown, anew on the original plan. EVE MAY 0 3 NO3 DIVISION COASTAL MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 1890 WILMINGTON. NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890 °rnrrcm" June 23, 2003 Regulatory Division Action ID No. 199403672 and State Permit No. 102-94 National Gypsum Company 838 Sunnyvale Drive Wilmington, North Carolina 28412 Dear Madam or Sir: Through. coordination with the N learned of your request to renew your I September 23,1994, which authorized Wilmington Harbor, New Hanover Coi Your proposal continues to be c permit No.198000291. The permit is of your permit remain. applicable and t Carolina Division of Coastal Management, we have rtment of the Army (DA) permit issued on December maintenance of a ship's berth on the Cape Fear River, North Carolina. it with the provisions and objectives of general renewed. It is understood that all other conditions the expiration date is December 31, 2007. If you have any questions or comments you may call me at (910) 251-4930. Sincerely, Henry Wicker, Project Manager Wilmington Regulatory Field Office Copies Furnished: Chief, Source Data Unit NOAA/National Ocean Survey ATTN: Sharon Tear N/CS261- 1315 East-West Hwy., Rm. 7316 Silver Spring, MD 20910-3282 Mr. Doug Huggett Division of Coastal Management North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1638 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638 Wilmington Regional Office North Carolina Division of Coastal Management 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, North Carolina 28405-3845 011 M 1.2.1, 03 (MON) 11:14 OENNR COSTAL MCMT TEL:919 733 1495 P.005 Permit Class 2ND RENEWAL —.:,• MAINTENANCES STATE OF,NORTFI CAROLINA Department of Environment and Natural Resources. and Coastal Resources Commission Vermit for X Major Development in an Area of Environmental Concern pursuant to NCGS 113A-118 X Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229 Issued to National Gyasum Company, 938 Sunnyvale Drive, Wilmington, NC 28412 Permit Number 102-94' Authorizing development in New Hanover County at the Cave Fear River at the junction of Stmny3We Dr. & River Rd. as requested in the permittee's application dated letter dated 2/25/03, This permit, issued onAg1;1121, 2003 , is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may to nnes, imprisonment or ctvu action; or may cause me permit to ors null ana vote. 1) This renewal must be attached to the Arnended'original of Permit No. 102-94, which was issued on 9/14194 and subsequently renewed on 2/18198, and all documents must be readily available on site when a Division representative inspects the project for compliance, All conditions and stipulations of the active permit remain in force under this renewal. (See attached sheet for Additional Conditions) This permit action may be appealed by the perminee or other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the issuing date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work initiation or continuance us the case may be. This permit must be accessible on -site to Department personnel when the project is inspected for campliancs. Any maintenance work or project modification not covered hereunder requires further Division approval, All work must ceose when due permit eapirea on December 31, 2007 In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees mat your project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal Management Program. Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DENR and the Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission, vN , na D. Moffitt, Director Division of Coastal Management This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted. Signature of Permittee OR,*,.,>V 03(MON) 11:15 OEHNR COSTAL MGMT National Gypsum. Company TEL:919 733 1495 P.006 ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS Permit #102.94 Page 2 of 2 Maintenance Clause 2) The Division of Coastal Management, Wilmington District Office, shall be notified in writing at least two (2) weeks in advance of any maintenance work authorized by this permit, and such notification shall include: A. The number of the original permit. B, A statement that no dimensional changes are proposed, C. A copy of the original permit plans with cross -hatching indicating the area to be maintained, the area to be used for spoil disposal, and the estimated amount of material to be removed. The location, design and holding capacity of the spoil disposal site must be approved by a representative of the Division prior to the initiation of any maintenance dredging activities, D. The date of map revision and the permittee's signature shown anew on the original plan. I . r r NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Naturaf Resources Division of Coastal Management Michael F. Easley, Governor Donna D. Moffitt, Director William G. Ross Jr., Secretary MEMORANDUM TO: DougHuggett Permits Section FROM: Jason Dail Field Representative, Wilmington DATE: March 6, 2003 y n: SUBJECT: 0. State Permit No. 1.02-94 was. issued on September 14, 1994, for maintenance of the existing marina basin. The permit was renewed in 1998 for five years. The current permit will expired on December 31, 2002. Mr. Stephen M. Miller, with National Gypsum Technical Resources, is requesting that the permitbe reneweed again. The location ofthe spofl disposal site would remain the same. This Office has no objection to the renewal of Permit No. 102-94. 'The applicant has included a check (ck No. 673697) in the amount of $100.00 for the ienewal. . I cc: ` harles Jones Henry Wicker S:CAMAUasonlRenewalslN.Gypsum ren.Mar.03 127 Cardinal Drive Ext Phone' 910-395-39001Fax: An Equal Wilmington, North Carolina 28405-3845 IO-20041 Internet: httpJldcm2.enr.state.nc.us Employer - 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper I NatioWlAirl Corporate Offices: 2001 Re3lord Road Gypsum CWotte, NO 28211 COMPANY 16145.7300 February 25, 2003 Ed Brooks Division of Coastal Management. NC Department of Environmental and Natural resources 127 Cardinal Drive Wilmington,: North Carolina 28405 Subject: Renewal of National Gypsum Company CANA Permit 102-94 Dear Mr. Brooks: NationalGypsumCompany requests renewal of CAMA Permit 102-94 for maintenance dredging of our berth in accordance.with conditions and stipulations ' stated in the original permit. Forwarded with this request is a check in the amount of $100 made payable to "NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources' from National Gypsum Company for the renewal fee. We trust that this correspondence and submission of the required fee is sufficient for renewal. However, if you have. any questions or need additional information; please do not hesitate to contactme. Sincerely, Stephen M. Miller, P.E. National Gypsum Company Technical Resources . Phone 704.365.7268 Fax 704.365.7316 smmillerAnationalovosum com cc: Steve LePage — NGCo. WLM Pit Mgr Gary Greene —_Gary Greene Engineers 307910 SECTION TIMEIDATE NAME REPRESENTING: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA Department of Environment and Natural Resources 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 (910) 39M900 File Access Record V� 1 Guidelines for Access: The staff of the Wilmington Regional Office is dedicated to making public records in our custody readily available to the public for review and copying. We also have the responsibility to the public to safeguard these records and to carry out our day -today program obligations. Please_read carefully the following guidelines before signing the form: 1. Please call at least a day in advance to schedule an appointment to review the files. Appointments will be scheduled between 9.00 a.m. and 3.00 p.m. Viewing time ends at 5:00 p.m. Anyone arriving without an appointment may view the files to the extent that time and staff supervision is available. 2. You must specify files you want to review by facility name. The number of files that you may review at one time will be limited to five. 3. You may make' copies of a file when the copier is not in use by the staff and if time permits.. re '�ie'aeS2a�sn�e�r • mirm . t,m Fct #oTa/l ca eeseml fa a art. : a, enY rna; be '.` MEW , � g rclea or 'c�as�t R'`#heo� ii"cTn desk � a�"�ea"�a'Ta'b`e�r�itE'e"�bd� enie o� fir. 4. FILES MUST BE KEPT IN THE ORDER YOU FOUND THENL .Files may not be taken from the office. To remove, alter, deface, mutilate, or destroy material in one of these files is a misdemeanor for which you can be fined up to $500.00. 5. In accordance with General Statute 2P-3-512, a $20.00 processing fee will be charged and collected for checks onyhift payment has been refused. FACILITY NAME / COUNTY 1. ►J1}-nm.,a-t_ G.yilSk�,r, �' �T �i t+{p 2. �- 3. 4. 5. SIIgtis i"n' amfq'-E;4t'>,fi�Bggdness. Dace'-. `' T"F In Tttn sOut• N Please attach a business card to this form Y� Revised10112198 0 FUNCTION->.0 NEXT PERMIT=> PERMIT/APPLICATION UPDATE RRD120 APP NO: ACF 94 0855 PERMIT NO: AEC: PT EW ES REGIONAL REP: BARRETT COUNTY: NEW HANOVER FEE: 250.00 DISTRICT: D PERMIT COORD: NAME: NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY LOCATION STRT: 838 SUNNYVALE DRIVE STRT: CTY: WILMINGTON ST: NC ZP: 28412 CTY: WILMINGTON ST: NC ZP: 28412 PHONE: 910 799 3954 DESCRIPTION: LOCATION: 838 SUNNYVALE DRIVE WATER BODY: CAPE FEAR RIVER DEV AREA: 262.40 PROJECT DESC-. C STATE PLANE COORD X: 2315450 Y: 156900 WORK: BB 530 60 35 0 fi 6000 950 fi 6000 950 MAIN: IMP: OW 31800 hg 5700000 hg 5700000 REQ STAT ACTION EXPIRATION RENEWAL # EXPIRATION MODIFIED # D & F: Y 0 0 CAMA: Y 0 0 SPC ACTION RCVD FLD RCVD RAL ASSIGNED ON HOLD OFF HOLD EXTENT EXT DRAFT DUE TPT 06 14 94 0 08 28 94 0 MESSAGE: ENTER DATA YOU WISH TO CHANGE PFI=HELP PF2=MAIN MENU PF3=PERMIT MENU PF4=PREY PF5=NAMES PF6=REQ WRK PF7=SCRN 2 ON A(q. 0-1 A %-Aqlh �1M A9/LAYvY 4 JVIV.PA-I O b.%bb 'W) pgro -Al� aSS -A�P tlll�Z/Z) G1 L5bl6 P -AT4. }gin" �* -do �44r<AAo North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality �CI� Division of Coastal ManagementCr W Major Permit Application Section 14 —Biological Assessment &Essential Fish Habitat Study J� uRBAn■ CAMA MAJOR PERMIT APPLICATION SECTION 14 - BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT & ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT STUDY As indicated during the April 17, 2020 scoping meeting, the 2020 South Atlantic Regional Biological Opinion (SARBO) would apply for this maintenance dredging project, which would preclude the need for species assessments included in the SARBO (i.e., Atlantic Sturgeon). In addition, a Biological Assessment and,Essential Fish Habitat Study were prepared for the proposed project and are included in this section In summary, the proposed project will be short in duration and will implement best management practices to minimize impacts to the subject area. The proposed project will adhere to seasonal construction restrictions and applicabl wildlife guidance to protection potential species within the project area. National Gypsum Wilmington Essential Fish Habitat Report National Gypsum Wilmington Maintenance Dredging Project July 2020 ��uRBRn Urban Engineers, Inc. Philadelphia, PA Essential Fish Habitat Technical Report National Gypsum Wilmington Maintenance Dredging Project Table of Contents l.o Introduction..........................................................................................i 2.0 Physical Environment..........................................................................4 3.o Essential Fish Habitat..........................................................................7 4.0 Potential Impacts to EFH...................................................................10 5.o Findings and Conclusions...................................................................11 6.o 6.0 References...........................................................................................12 Fienres Figure 1: USGS Project Location Map Figure 2: Aerial Project Location Map Figure 3: Hydrographic Survey EssentialbYsh Habitat Technical Report National Gypsum Wilmington Maintenance Dredging Project 1.0 INTRODUCTION Urban Engineers, Inc. (Urban) prepared this essential fish habitat (EFH) technical report for the proposed Maintenance Dredging Project at National Gypsum's Wilmington facility located at 838 Sunnyvale Drive, Wilmington, North Carolina. The purpose of this document is to assess impacts to EFH resulting from the maintenance dredging and dredged material disposal. The Magnuson -Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 USC 18oi et seq.) requires the U.S. Secretary of Commerce,to develop guidelines amending regional fisheries management plans for the identification and creation of management and conservation plans for EFH. Each council is required to amend existing fisheries management plans to include EFH designations and conservation requirements. The act also requires federal agencies to consult with the Secretary ion all actions, or proposed actions, authorized, funded, or undertaken by the agency, that might adversely affect EFH. EFH is defined as "those waters and substrate necessary to fish for spawning, breeding, feeding, or growth to maturity" (16 USC 1802 (10). "Waters" include aquatic areas and their associated physical, chemical, and biological properties that are used by fish, and can include aquatic areas historically used, by fish, where appropriate. "Substrate" includes sediment, hard bottom, structures underlying the waters, and associated biological communities. "Necessary" means the habitat is required to support a sustainable fishery, and the managed species contributions to a healthy ecosystem. "Spawning, breeding, feeding, or growth to maturity' covers a species full life cycle. EFH designations are required only for species or species units for which Councils have developed Fisheries Management Plans (IMP). 1.1L Project Description and Purpose & Need The National Gypsum Maintenance Dredging Project includes maintenance dredging at National Gypsum's Wilmington commercial berth facility to a depth of -36' mean low water (MLW) (-12,000 cubic yards of material) and -2 feet over dredge (-5,000 cubic yards of material) in order to continue Nationals Gypsum's operations at their Wilmington Facility (total of—17,000 cubic yards). The dredged material will be disposed at a private confined disposal facility (CDF) located in Brunswick County (Parcel No. 05900006) at approximately 34.176788 N,-77.9635io W, which is directly across the river from the proposed maintenance dredging area. Refer to Figures 1 and 2 for the Project Location Maps and Figure 3 for the Hydrographic Survey. The proposed project will require a Section 404/10 permit and a CAMA Major Permit. Maintenance dredging water dependent and is imperative for National Gypsum to continue their operations in this region. This area has not been dredged since at least the early 20005 and therefore there is a significant need to deepen the berthing area to ensure the safe passage of ships and to accommodate the ships required for National Gypsum to receive gypsum shipments. If the berthing area, is not dredged, this will lead to significant financial implications for National Gypsum and ultimately impact the local economy. The proposed EssentialFish Habitat Technical Report National Gypsum Wilmington Maintenance Dredging Project dredging is anticipated to occur in 2021. The proposed dredging will not change the use of the site. 1.2 Maintenance Dredging Methodology The proposed maintenance dredging will be performed via hydraulic dredging (cutter suction dredge) and will consist of a cutter head and a hydraulic booster pump. The cutter head will be lowered into the sediment bed to fluidize the sediment agitation and to draw the slurry into the suction pipe. The material will then be pumped through a sunken pipe that extends across the bottom of the Cape Fear River and into the upland CDF. The dredge material will be discharged at the CDF that will be isolated by an earthen berm. A backhoe will move the pipe/material around as needed within the CDF during dredging. Water pumped with the dredge material will be contained in the placement site until the solids settle out. Once settled, the effluent will drain back to the river in a controlled manner through the weirs. Both the weir elevation and effluent content will be monitored to stay within permitted effluent parameters. Sediment sampling was performed at the proposed dredge area in November 2019. The results noted wood debris in some of the samples collected. If significant timber debris are encountered, they will be removed by mechanical means, using either a backhoe or clamshell bucket, to allow for continued hydraulic dredging. The debris will then be placed in a scow and transported to the disposal facility. Work associated with the proposed project will only take i to 2 months. Specifically, the maintenance dredging is expected to take approximately 2 weeks to complete; a turbidity barrier will be implemented around the dredge. Prior to the maintenance dredging, the pipe will be strung across the bottom of the river, which will take about 2 days. Some minor grading and maintenance work is anticipated at the CDF to prepare for the disposal of the dredge material; this work is anticipated to take approximately 2 to 4 weeks. 1.3 Dredged Material Disposal The dredged material CDF is currently owned by Bate, Land and Timber (BLT) Trust. Urban anticipates that the dredge disposal will be placed on approximately 25 acres of the CDF, primarily in the area previously used for dredge disposal. The dredged material will be confined on high ground to prevent spill -over of solids into any marsh or surrounding waters. The berm height varies between 28 feet above mean high water (MHW) at the inlet (northern) side, to 18 feet above MHW at the outlet (southern) side). Water pumped with the dredged material will be contained in the placement site until the solids settle out. The terminal end of the pipeline will be positioned at least 50 feet from any part of the dike and the distance between this inflow point and the weir spillways will be maximized to allow settlement of suspended solids. During dredging operations, the material inflow point, weir elevation, and CDF grading will be maintained to promote proper drainage. The disposal process will be monitored and the flow rate will be regulated to avoid overtopping of the CDF berms and prevent excessive ponding. The material will be stabilized to keep sediments from entering adjacent waters or wetlands. Lssentialbish Habitat Technical Report National Gypsum Wilmington Maintenance Dredging Project The effluent will drain back to the river in a controlled manner through the weir. Effluent will be contained in pipes and discharged at a point in the water past visible vegetation and below the normal high water line to prevent gully erosion and unnecessary siltation. A water control structure will be installed at the intake end of the effluent pipe to assure compliance with water quality standards. Effluent sampling and monitoring will be performed to adhere to water quality standards, including stopping dredging and treating effluent, as needed. During dredging operations, a turbidity curtain will be installed around the outfall of the effluent pipes to further reduce any remaining turbidity. Timber crane mats will be placed on an approximately 35 feet swath the wetland slopes past the berms for equipment access and pipeline path. The timber crane mats will be placed on the minimal area of wetlands possible to minimize temporary impacts to the wetlands. 1.4 Project Area The project area includes the approximately 2-acre proposed dredge area located at National Gypsum's Wilmington facility berth in the Cape Fear River (Stream Classification "SC") at approximately Lat: 34.17375 N, Long:-75.957511 W in New Hanover County. National Gypsum's Wilmington facility is located at 838 Sunnyvale Drive, Wilmington, NC. The dredged material consists of sand, silt,'and clay from the navigable waters of the United States. The project area is located in open water with depths ranging from approximately - 12 MLW to -37 MLW. Due to past maintenance dredging and past frequent use of the area by large ships, submerged vegetation is not located within the project area. National Gypsum Company unloads gypsum at the shipping berth for wallboard production at the wallboard plant across River Road. The manufacturing facilities are located on the east side of SR lioo with a conveyor belt crossing the highway to the property on the west side. The conveyor continues along a pier extending into Cape Fear River terminating on the shipping berth. There is a paved access way from SR lioo to the river. The existing berthing facility extends approximately 1,68o feet into the Cape Fear River, with a dock extending approximately 195 feet to the north of the pier. The CDF is located in Brunswick County (Parcel No. 05900006) at approximately 34.176788 N,-77.963510 W, which his directly across the river from the proposed maintenance dredging area. The area where the dredged material will be stored is approximately 25 acres and has previou Isly been used as a dredged material disposal facility. The adjacent property land use consists of mixed industrial and commercially developed properties. National Gypsum is located) in a highly industrial area, with adjacent activities including fuel processing plants and co mmercial ports; all have commercial docks. The channel of the Cape Fear River is continually maintained for commercial navigation by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 1.5 Site History National Gypsum's facility was constructed in 1975, at which time the river adjacent to the berth was dredged to a depth of 35 feet MLW. Maintenance dredging occurred at the site at Essential Fish Habitat Technical Report National Gypsum Wilmington Maintenance Dredging Project regular intervals from 1975 until the early 2000s. The National Gypsum plant was shut down in early 2oo9 and resumed shipping in 2oi8. The area where the dredged material will be stored is approximately 25 acres and has previously been used as a CDF. National Gypsum has utilized this disposal facility for dredged material disposal as recent as the 20oos. This site is owned by BLT Trust. The proposed use of both the maintenance dredge area and the confined disposal facility will not change due to this project. The proposed dredge area consists primarily of silt and clay; sand and wood debris is also present in the proposed maintenance dredge area. 2.o PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT EFH may be characterized in terms of the physical environment and its resources. These factors are described below for the conditions that exist within the project area. 2.1. Basin Morphology and Bathymetry The proposed maintenance dredge area is located in open water in the Cape Fear River with depths ranging from approximately -12 MLW to -37 MLW. Surveyed bathymetry adjacent at the proposed dredge area is illustrated in Figure 3. 2.3 Tides and Tidal Datums Representative tide data for the Project Area are provided by the NOAA tide station for Wilmington, NC. This tide station is located approximately 3.5 miles from the site, near the Ocean Highway Bridge. The mean tidal range at this station is 4.28 feet. The various NOAA tidal datum (during the 1983-2001 tidal epoch) are summarized in Table 1, below. Y_IFA :3_0DIM 1C11N:11 y I Ih711 At7:M rolu i LMI GTO ', NC WIlVGTON, t DATUM STATIO NG STATION tta, ' i,ks" (Completeei983- (Complete,198g- .�;xr, 2ooiEP©CH) 200 EPOCH) �, MHHW (mean higher high water) 4.68 2.08 MHW 4.43 1.83 NAVD-88 2.6o 0.00 MSL (mean sea level) 2.44 -o.16 MTL (mean tide level) 2.2 -o. 1 MLW o.16 -2.44 MLLW (mean lower low water) 0.00 -2.6o * MLLW is defined as the average of the lowest of the two low -tide elevations observed each lunar day over a i9-year tidal epoch ** NAVD-88 (North American Vertical Datum of 1988) is the current topographic survey datum 4 EssentialFish Habitat Technical Report Urban Engineers Liberty Landing Marina Jersey City, Hudson County, NewJersey 2.4 Water Quality The project is located in and adjacent to the Cape Fear River, in the Cape Fear River Basin. Water quality The Cape Fear River in the location of the project area is classified as "SC." SC waters are all tidal salt waters protected for secondary recreation such as fishing, boating, and other activities involving minimal skin contact; fish and noncommercial shellfish consumption; aquatic life propagation and survival; and wildlife. According to the North Carolina 2018 Integrated Report for water quality, the following constituents exceed criteria in the vicinity of the proposed project: dissolved oxygen (5 milligrams/liter (mg/1)), copper (3 micrograms/liter (ug/1)), pH (6.8), and mercury in fish tissue. The data is inclusive for iron (1,000 ug/1). Representative water quality data was obtained from the NCDENR, Division of Water Resources Basinwide Assessment Report Ambient Monitoring System Station No. B9800000, located at the Cape Fear River at CM61 at Wilmington (approximately 1.5 miles north of the proposed maintenance dredge area). The results at this station indicated that dissolved oxygen is less than 5 milligrams per liter (mg/1), pH is less than 6.8 and water temperature is greater than 320C. In addition, USGS Water Quality Gauge located in the Cape Fear River, near Wilmington, NC (USGS 021o869o) collected in 2004 is summarized in Table 2, The USGS station is located at approximately 5.5 miles north of the maintenance dredge area. Table 2: Water Quality Parameters Elm NS- not sampled ppt — parts per trillion Essential Fish Habitat Technical Report Urban Engineers Liberty Landing Marina Jersey City, Hudson County, NeWersey 2.4A Dissolved Oxygen Fish and invertebrates require dissolved oxygen (DO) to survive, grow, and reproduce; the level of DO required varies by organism. Fish typically require at least 2 milligrams per liter (mg/1), however since fish are highly mobile, most can avoid areas of low DO. Growth of actively swimming fish is reduced at DO concentrations less than 6 mg/L (and metabolism is reduced at 4.5 mg/L. The most recent measurement of DO at the monitoring location was less than 5 mg/L and historic measurements were at or less than 6 mg/L. Therefore, DO in this area is typically not ideal for fish growth and activity. As discussed above, fish are mobile and can move away from low areas of DO. 2.4.2 Temperature Temperature patterns affect fish distribution and functions. Estuarine organisms can tolerate a wide range of temperatures if given adequate time to acclimate. Early life stages of many species (e.g., clams, oysters, spot, croaker, flounder, menhaden) have lower tolerances than adults. If water temperature falls too low or too rapidly, sensitive species like red drum and seatrout may die. Cold shock is a key factor in spotted seatrout decline. The temperature range of 19 to 320C is typical for estuarine waters in this area. 2.4.3 pH The pH of the water affects egg develo] DO. Most fish require pH greater than can be reduced. Low pH can release t aquatic plants and animals. Estuarine freshwater having the most variable pf capacity. The optimum pH for spawn: 6.75. Recent measurements of pH is 1 6.1 to 7.3. Therefore, this area is suital 2.4.4 Salinity tent, reproduction, and the ability of fish to absorb >; above or below which diversity and reproduction is elements, making them available for uptake by i depends on the mix of seawater and freshwater, iepending on organic matter content and buffering is 7.8 and for successful recruitment is great than > than 6.8 and historic measurements range from for fish, but is not optimum. Based on historic data, the project area is located in an area of moderate salinity. The water column is critically important as it directly affects all other estuarine aquatic habitats. 2.5 Climate Site climate is typical for the South Atlantic seaboard. Average monthly temperatures range from approximately 56 to 90 degrees Fahrenheit (°F). Approximately 58 inches of rain falls annually, well distributed throughout the year. EssentialFish Habitat. Technical Report Urban Engineers Liberty Landing Marina Jersey City, Hudson County, NewJersey 3.0 ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT Managed species found in the project area fall under the joint responsibility of the South Atlantic Fisheries Management Council (SAFMC), the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC) and the North Carolina Marine Fisheries Commission (NCMFC). These agencies have defined EFH for the species under their jurisdiction. Table 3 lists EFH Habitats and indicates its presence or absence within the project area. Table 3: Essential Fish Habitat Types PesenG dEr) oi;FAbserits A iri?Pro ect Area': Submerged AuaticVegetation A Shell Bottom A Hard Bottom A Soft Bottom A Estuarine Water Column P Wetlands P 3.1 Habitat Types 3.1.1 Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Submerged aquatic vegetation habitat rooted into the ground and remain un These plants form dense forests, called acres. The depth of the water column feet. Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (S be found in water depths greater tha parameter at this site. 3.1.2 Shell Bottom Shell bottom habitat exists in areas of clams and other shellfish. These areas shell hash. The aquatic bed has previous the maintenance dredging area to accc sediments is primarily silt, clay and son found within the project area. Accordii Habitat Mapping Program, shell botton 3.1.3 Hard Bottom characterized by the presence of plants that are r the surface of the water during all tidal stages. !ds, which range in size from less than a meter to jacent to the berthing area varies from 12 to 44 9 is light limited at this depth. SAV is unlikely to 6 feet. Therefore, SAV is not a critical habitat ottom composed of living or dead oysters, hard .dude oyster beds, oyster rocks, oyster bars and r been dredged to a depth of -44 MLW feet within modate vessels. The composition of the bottom sand. There are no Oyster reefs or Intertidal flats to the North Carolina DENR Estuarine Benthic iabitat is not present within the project area. Hard bottom habitat generally occurs in the ocean where rocks or other hard surfaces are exposed from bottom sand or mud. These hard surfaces (reefs) can be naturally occurring, like rocks, or can be man-made, like shipwrecks or jetties. When hard bottom habitat is Essential,Ksh Habitat Technical Report Urban Engineers Liberty Landing Marina Jersey City, Hudson County, NeWersey man-made it is called an artificial reef. According to the North Carolina NCDENR Mapping Program, hard bottom habitat is not present within the project area. 3.1.4 Soft Bottom Soft bottom habitat occurs wherever' there is uncovered, unvegetated sediment in freshwater, estuarine and marine systems. Soft bottom is utilized by nearly every native fish species in North Carolina and is a critical habitat to species of fish that dig or bury themselves in substrate. According to the North Carolina NCDENR Mapping Program, soft bottom habitat is not present within the project area. 3.1.5 Estuarine Water Column The water column connects all habitat types and is critical for fish movement between other habitats. The water column allows sunlight to reach aquatic plants and algae, it allows oxygen and other essential dissolved nutrients to be delivered to aquatic plants and animals, and it provides a medium for all aquatic organisms to live. The estuarine water column of the Cape Fear River, near Wilmington, NC (USGS Annual Water Statistics) in 2004 had salinity levels which varied from o.o to 14.0 ppt and is considered an area of moderate salinity. VL.6 Wetlands Wetlands consist of areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. No wetlands are located in or adjacent to the proposed maintenance dredge area. Although estuarine wetlands are located adjacent to the dredged material disposal area, there will be no permanent impacts to the wetlands. 3.2 Primary Nursery Area The project area is located in a PNA, according to the North Carolina Marine Fisheries Nursery Area Maps. Primary nursery areas (PNAs) are designated areas that support embryonic, larval or juvenile populations of marine or estuarine fish or crustacean species. The MFC designated PNAs initially in 1977 as settlement areas for post -larvae of offshore winter spawners. The designations were a result of DMF trawling and seine surveys and rigorous sampling showing areas continually supportive of juvenile shrimp, crab, and finfish populations. Data from DMF Estuarine Trawl Surveys indicate that the number of juvenile species in PNAs is greater in waters north of Cape Lookout than to the south. The proposed project will be short in duration; the maintenance dredging will only take about 1 week to complete. In addition, work will occur during dredging moratoria to protect migrations of fish, sensitive life stages of aquatic organisms, and threatened and endangered species. EssentialFish Habitat Technical Report Urban Engineers Liberty Landing Marina Jersey City, Hudson County, New Jersey 3.3 Habitats of Particular Concern According to NOAA, there are two Habitats of Particular Concern (HPAC) near the project area: penaeid shrimp and snapper grouper. HAPCs are subsets of EFH that exhibit one or more of the following traits: rare, stressed by development, provide important ecological functions for federally managed species, or are especially vulnerable to anthropogenic (or human impact) degradation. HAPCs are designated through action by the regional fishery management councils and do not convey additional restrictions or protections on an area; they simply focus increased scrutiny, study, or mitigation planning compared to surrounding areas because they represent high priority areas for conservation, management, or research and are necessary for healthy ecosystems and sustainable fisheries. Since the project area is located within HPACs, work will occur during dredging moratoria to protect the HPACs. 3.4 Managed Fish Species of the Lower Hudson Estuary The SAFMC/ASMFC/NCMFC managed species potentially within the project area are listed in Table 4, below. Table 4: SAFMC/ASMFC/NCMFC Managed Species 4 � � vs 'awiung`�` SpeMI ggraffvae enes J vil Adult'tldpu,,lt�As Rs' Atlantic butterfish (Peprilus triacanthus) X X X X Atlantic Croaker (Micropogonias undulates) X X American Eel* (Anguilla rostrate) X X Atlantic Menhaden (Breuoortia tyrannus) X X Atlantic sturgeon* (Acipenser oxyrinchus) X Black drum (Pogonias cromis) X X Bluefish (Pomatomus saltatrix) X X Kingfishes (southernMenticirrhus X X americanus, GuIfM. littoralis, and northern - M. saxiatlis) Red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) X X Sand tiger shark (Carcharias taurus) X X X X Shad &River Hering (Alosa) X EssentialKsh Habitat Technical Report Urban Engineers Liberty Landing Marina Jersey City, Hudson County, NewJersey Spawning Species r Egg Larvae - rJuveniles Adults , _Adults " Snapper grouper X X X X Spanish mackerel (Scomberomorus X X X X maculatus) Spinner shark (Carcharhinus brevipinna) X X X X Spot (Leiostomus xanthurus) X X X X Spotted seatrout(Cynoscion nebulosus) X X X X X Striped bass (Moronesaxatilis) X X X X X Summer flounder (Paralichthys dentatus) X X * = indicates state or federally listed threatened species or At Risk Species X= indicates potential presence within Study area Many of the species that are seasonally abundant in the Cape Fear River are transient or migratory species, moving through the area to upstream spawning grounds, or entering the area on a seasonal basis from nearby ocean waters. These include estuarine migratory species that depend on estuaries primarily as a nursery, or as a forage area for juveniles or adults. Estuarine species tolerate the naturally wide range and abrupt changes in salinity from tidal freshwater to marine environments (0.5 to 30 practical salinity unit (psu)). These species generally begin spawning in late spring and continue throughout most of the summer, following general onshore and offshore seasonal movement patterns (i.e., onshore in spring and summer, offshore to deeper waters in fall and winter). Previous biological investigations have characterized the seasonal distribution and composition of the fish community in various habitats and areas in the Cape Fear River. Most of these species might be expected to occur within the project area; however, a limited number of species typically dominate the fish community. Most of the species listed in Table 4 are not considered over -fished by the MAFMC. 4.0 POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO EFH 4.1 South Atlantic Regional Biological Opinion (2020 SARBO) The 2020 South Atlantic Regional Biological Opinion (2020 SARBO) was prepared for Dredging and Material Placement Activities in the Southeast United States. Activities considered include dredging, dredge material placement, geotechnical and geophysical surveys and monitoring for and handling ESA -listed species encountered. The NMFS concluded that the proposed action is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of 10 Essential Fish Habitat Technical Report Urban Engineers Liberty Landing Marina Jersey City, Hudson County, NewJersey ESA -listed species or result in adverse effects to designated critical habitats. The 2020 SARBO indicates that USACE determined hydraulic (cutter suction) and mechanical dredging is not likely to have an adverse effect on Atlantic Sturgeon in the Carolina District Population Segment (DPS). The NMFS' opinion was that the proposed action is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of Atlantic Sturgeon. NMFS does not believe maintenance dredging disturbances will significantly or permanently reduce suitable habitat for spawning, foraging, resting and migrations of all individuals. 4.2 Short-term and Long -Term Impacts Short-term impacts to fish and the EFH community can occur due to noise and turbidity in the project area. Fish and EFH may be temporarily disturbed by the proposed dredging activities. However, the fish would move away from the work area during construction, and return when construction is completed. Shading effects would be minimal, since the project area has depths that preclude SAV habitat. Dredging may increase turbidity to the project area during, but implementation of a turbidity curtain will minimize impacts. In general, the maintained deep waters of the maintenance dredge area will not allow for a return to a shallow water aquatic bottom habitat, which is typically more biologically productive. Best Management Practices (BMPs), controlled and monitored effluent, and the use of a turbidity curtain will minimize pollutants into the water from the proposed project. 5.o FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The proposed project water dependent operating out of their Wilmington Facili National Gypsum's Wilmington Plant v not dredged. The berthing area has be dredged since the 1970s. The propose required moratoria and implement BM The project area is typical of estuaries anadromous fish species. These fish mi depending on spawning area (estuaril Relatively few species are year-round re The proposed project area includes 1 disposal area and the immediately s these areas. This limited area of pro] listed in Table 4. However, due to the expected that the abundance and dis area are limited. id is necessary for National Gypsum to continue so that ships can safely berth and unload gypsum. not be able to operate in the future if the area is dredged to -44 MLW in the past and has been project will be short in duration, adhere to all to minimize impacts to the environment. and supports a variety of estuarine, marine, and ,rate in and out of the estuary on a seasonal basis e vs. marine) and period (winter vs. summer). ;idents in thesewaters. area of the maintenance dredging and confined )unding benthic substrate and water column of �d work has the potential to support the species itively poor water quality of the project area, it is ution of fish species in the waters in the project The project area is located within an! active shipping berth and adjacent to an active EssentialFish Habitat Technical Report Urban Engineers Liberty Landing Marina Jersey City, Hudson County, NeWersey navigational channel, which is expected Ito remain in operation for the foreseeable future. Therefore, significant habitat improvements in the project area over time are not expected. Impacts to fish and EFH within the project area are expected to be minimal, since present and future site use will remain the same. Therefore, both the short and long-term effects of the proposed project on water quality and EFH are negligible when taken in the context of the surrounding area and the habitat it provides. 6.o GENERAL REFERENCES / CITED LITERATURE Able, K. W., J. P. Manderson, and A. Studholme. 1999. "Habitat Quality for Shallow Water Fishes in an Urban Estuary: The Effects of Man -Made Structures on Growth." Marine Ecology Progress Series, 187: 227-235• Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission. Managed Species. Available: http://www.asmfc.org/managedSpecies.htm Beck, M.W., K.L. Heck Jr., K.W. Able, D.L. Childers, D.B. Eggleston, B.M. Gillanders, B. Halpern, C.G. Hayes, K. Hoshino, T.J. Minello, R.J. Orth, P.F. Sheridan, and M.P. Weinstein. 2001. "The Identification, Conservation, and Management, of Estuarine and Marine Nurseries for Fish and Invertebrates." Bioscience. 51(8):633-641. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe.1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS- 79/31, Washington, D.C. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Available: https://www. fisheries.noaa.gov/news/habitat-areas-particular-concern-within-essential-fish- habitat National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Tides & Currents Data. Available: https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/physocean.html?id=8658120 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Species Finder. Available: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/find-species North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC). Available: 15a NCAC o7h.0208: http://repo rts.oah.state.nc.us/ncac/title%2015a%20 %2oenvironmental%2oquality/chapter% 2007%20-%2ocoastal%2omanagement/subchapter% 2oh/15a%2oncaC%20 o7h% 20.0208.pdf North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Cape Fear River Basin Data. Available: https://deq.ne.gov/cape-fear-river-basin North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Habitat Information. 12 Essential Fish Habitat Technical Report Urban Engineers Liberty Landing Marina Jersey City, Hudson County, NewJersey Available: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/mf/habitat/nc-habitat North Carolina Division of Water Resources. 2017. Ambient Monitoring System Summary Report, 2010- 2014. Raleigh, North Carolina: North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality. North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries. Available: http://portal.nedenr.org/web/mf/ South Atlantic Fishery Management Coul cil. Fishery Management Council. Available: https://safmc.net/ U.S. Climate Data Available: https://www.usclimatedata.com/climate/wilmington/north- carolina/united-states/usnc0760 USGS National Water Information System. Cape Fear River near Wilmington, NC (USGS 0210869o). Available: https://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/inventory/?site_nO= 02108690 &agency_cd=USGS 13 ° CD w a� CD~ CD7 0 pw g =O F m w p m w ° 00 (D O w _ao 5 O w a w W A (D N m A N f V rj 00 Jm ? 4 v z J Oo N Ln W O to C N �i! N a v N N CD M O V7 SD M pO.Y= 3 aao o n � oQ oa Z D 0 n v p T w z �. n 0 z C) —► z p n •"r,°:: :i,i,}i� :d'v ::7sf/ t•` • r'fi:•a;.yrwrry r #r (� � `' i yi.{ '..' 1 J� - i }Y r �rbt 1 t ... ,j t {�:' ,• �. •.art ..,.'.: :;:Y :; f4{ti:ti� j•y r !�{ t @ t�'+ �1 A 11�� } ' �} �':�'r !t � Y d if }x F+ r•• 19 :.�.1L4+:f� ntyrtFy„• 'li.. •.:yi%V�r::" ty,i�r �" t �3':} � y{ '� Fii Lr r f •:S �•: :•:+''•��: n ♦ aft�i,.}:. :,;t; v r :,:..y -tvr I � 7! � ! r �y t.' s:t }i i!•r%:.'i, �+ F S r v r 1 r t y r ^vir. 1 z yy ii,, 1�-� ,j } -� v s y, f`=,••_ !l�..:': :trl.r.tiv:?.: t v rr v t :v r� t 7 � � �+tf- 4 = � � � 1'�� i- } !••• vsty r rrll rt r`T}$� :r lrly r!{t Ki2'. N�t•t r,f ty„ttJ ,3"'/'ty'• r fr1!t �1S I �}�ib� � °�i t � ., 'i rreL f'} rs Fr i+af1 ills fj. %r L � t r3 ! ,;,t c r $ v l t� + ! .�. y w��•'r'•" y �� rtr`iirrw'''r'i tty$rr r�Jtyr ttt� i r.i �tyd4vrr�yt�rtjiaR. z a �` = i r t if:z`, ffvt r rr p .rs rti m •vnt t r4r �h e J ylivtiF ' t'trsr in fr ri' t i its ��.. ii rr yt�rrrev t � s �J t .+v' •4•y^^rrl""'a'%. r.:.lt IrLY rt .ttt . . •r• ?�riyrt%r•f••E'7t'.4 .�h t ,. . rr. i' < i .• - . •. e t rN.•.r �v�: .:i • .ar'r.� :• ' ;tL.et ••r.;�v.} S C;1•,: :t :.." 1t•:::•: 3`t ^A :�1.l;}•vrti.�: � ;: �•ii:`Yh':'t=/1t''11t L{r{r� 6i Yh� tt`t�}is � i • i v ttrr aidr jt'yv ! I fi�r` x s!'a ` .. r t �tt: a sr '.'t:f.� :it v y v s }t ttty : n vrl '�' t r r3SiY t •+t: �{.. i tTtp l 4 _ bf I r a .. :..,V •r,wiS ��. r .� r ty #5 t} �,r{ r,•y r f5 � r 4 , �. t r' ` fi � y :t ♦ ;^t: �:.:Y.� St^r':••Ctt+, : i vvY � t i t .r 5j. !ti !:! it:r.t t, .•t t •.t f t u rHjf 1� Uj .• Vy •.itrl rvr 'x ;. ynft f4 �g:t;l;n Y p•�ttli.• LS fi' �1.1 t 1 .!U � i �i 4,. r •r9 ��IS{ L > t�rtr rats iE ..a .. . . `5 .. y tj � yt tlrr } A ytt rJ•F r !e LL ft r r rlrl N t r; r y �`t^�r rrstit;`$ r'J+y' . 1+y a r�ayt or:ri' {=a yt,1`Yrih :t lit •t`ty yirit r ,r rS II ,. r .r � r ; <"i. t L.:>� rh { i yr t J rGt tt t itv vtt i y ii}� t `t r frr ,y �•O. t �., a v r rPt �t:1 t gi y f {r }tY t b d t�i ,� ''1 'rkY4 o, 3 Ca ON t7 7 d' � e { at'• (b77 Al � : j � t tit v •��.• �. t U yy� T'Y J x r �.. t r � �e J i� ^ � � F I �� a n.• t r it y �V ��i r y J gg NY rat. •� d `t �. '. tjs � �• 1 � •i d � y � Dredge AreaIV lj ryvele Didva „�; .;,. - 5A t ' ' ta. Table of Contents 1.o Introduction.........................................................................................i 2.0 Project Description & Purpose & Need...............................................I 3.o Action Area .......................... :............................................................... 3 4.o Alternatives.........................:...............................................................4 5.o Threatened, Endangered an,d At Risk Species Effects Analysis ........ 5 6.o Critical Habitats .................. !............................................................... 7 7.0 Conclusions and .....................................................8 8.o Literature Cited.................................................................................10 Figures Figure is USGS Project Location Figure 2: Aerial Project Location Figure 3: Hydrographic Survey Appendices Appendix A: Wetland Delineation Report Appendix B: Guidelines for Avoiding Impacts to the West Indian Manatee 1.o Introduction Urban Engineers, Inc. (Urban), on behalf of National Gypsum Company (NGC) prepared this US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Biological Assessment (BA) for the proposed Maintenance Dredging Project at National Gypsum's Wilmington berthing facilitylocated at 838 Sunnyvale Drive, Wilmington, North Carolina. The proposed project will require a Section 404/10 permit and a CAMA Major Permit. BAs are required for major construction activities, which includes maintenance dredging. The purpose of this BA is to evaluate the potential effects of the proposed project on listed and proposed species and designated and proposed critical habitat and determine whether any such species or habitat are likely to be adversely affected by the project. 2.0 Project Description and The National Gypsum Maintenance D National Gypsum's Wilmington comr. water (MLW) (-12,000 cubic yards a yards of material) in order to continue Facility (total of—17,000 cubic yards). confined disposal facility (CDF) locate approximately 34.176788 N,-77.9635 proposed maintenance dredging area. Maps and Figure 3 for the Hydrogra, Section 404/10 permit and a CAMA M Maintenance dredging water depi continue their operations in this rep early 2000s and therefore there is a the safe passage of ships and to ace, receive gypsum shipments. If the N financial implications for National c proposed dredging is anticipated to the use of the site. Maintenance Dredging Methodology & Need edging Project includes maintenance dredging at ercial berth facility to a depth of -36' mean low material) and -2 feet over dredge (-5,00o cubic lational Gypsum's operations at their Wilmington ['he dredged material will be disposed at a private i in Brunswick County (Parcel No. 05900006) at o W, which is directly across the river from the Refer to Figures 1 and 2 for the Project Location hic Survey. The proposed project will require a .ior Permit. it and is imperative for National Gypsum to This area has not been dredged since at least the ficant need to deepen the berthing area to ensure odate the ships required for National Gypsum to ig area is not dredged, this will lead to significant im and ultimately impact the local economy. The r in 2021. The proposed dredging will not change The proposed maintenance dredging Will be performed via hydraulic dredging (cutter suction dredge) and will consist of a cutter head and a hydraulic booster pump. The cutter head will be lowered into the sedimentl bed to fluidize the sediment agitation and to draw the slurry into the suction pipe. The material will then be pumped through a sunken pipe that extends across the bottom of the Cape Fear River and into the upland CDF. The dredge material will be discharged at the CDF that will be isolated by an earthen berm. A backhoe will move the pipe/material around as needed within the CDF during dredging. Water pumped with the dredge material will be contained in the placement site until the solids settle out. Once settled, the effluent will drain back to the river in a controlled manner through the weirs. Both the weir elevation and effluent content will be monitored to stay within permitted effluent parameters. Sediment sampling was performed at the proposed dredge area in November 2019. The results noted wood debris in some of the samples collected. If significant timber debris are encountered, they will be removed'by mechanical means, using either a backhoe or clamshell bucket, to allow for continued hydraulic dredging. The debris will then be placed in a scow and transported to the disposal facility. Work associated with the proposed project will only take t to 2 months. Specifically, the maintenance dredging is expected to take approximately 2 weeks to complete; a turbidity barrier will be implemented around thb dredge. Prior to the maintenance dredging, the pipe will be strung across the bottom of the river, which will take about 2 days. Some minor grading and maintenance work is anticipated at the CDF to prepare for the disposal of the dredge material; this work is anticipated to take approximately 2 to 4 weeks. Dredged Material Disposal The dredged material CDF is currently dredged material CDF is currently owe anticipates that the dredge disposal wi primarily in the area previously used confined on high ground to prevent s waters. The berm height varies betwe inlet (northern) side, to 18 feet above A with the dredged material will be con out. The terminal end of the pipeline the dike and the distance between 1 maximized to allow settlement of su material inflow point, weir elevation, proper drainage. The disposal proc regulated to avoid overtopping of the ( The material will be stabilized to k wetlands. The effluent will drain bac weir. Effluent will be contained in pipe vegetation and below the normal high siltation. A water control structure w.. to assure compliance with water quali be performed to adhere to water qr treating effluent, as needed. Durin; installed around the outfall of the efflr, wned by Bate, Land and Timber (BLT) Trust. The d by Bate, Land and Timber (BLT) Trust. Urban be placed on approximately 25 acres of the CDF, it dredge disposal. The dredged material will be 11-over of solids into any marsh or surrounding 128 feet above mean high water (MHW) at the iW at the outlet (southern) side). Water pumped ined in the placement site until the solids settle 11 be positioned at least 50 feet from any part of is inflow point and the weir spillways will be fended solids. During dredging operations, the nd CDF grading will be maintained to promote s will be monitored and the flow rate will be )F berms and prevent excessive ponding. �p sediments from entering adjacent waters or to the river in a controlled manner through the and discharged at a point in the water past visible rater line to prevent gully erosion and unnecessary be installed at the intake end of the effluent pipe standards. Effluent sampling and monitoring will lity standards, including stopping dredging and dredging operations, a turbidity curtain will be nt pipes to further reduce any remaining turbidity. Timber crane mats will be placed on an approximately 35 feet swath the wetland slopes past the berms for equipment access Iand pipeline path. The timber crane mats will be placed on the minimal area of wetland's possible to minimize temporary impacts to the wetlands. Site History National Gypsum's facility was constructed in 1975, at which time the river adjacent to the berth was dredged to a depth of 35 feet MLW. Maintenance dredging occurred at the site at regular intervals from 1975 until the early 20oos. The National Gypsum plant was shut down in early 2oo9 and resumed shipping in 2oi8. The area where the dredged material will be stored is approximately 25 acres and has previously been used as a CDF. National Gypsum has utilized this disposal facility for dredged material disposal as recent as {he 20oos. This site is owned by BLT Trust. The proposed use of both the maintenance dredge area and the confined disposal facility will not change due to this project. The proposed dredge area consists primarily of silt and clay; sand and wood debris is also present in the proposed maintenance dredge area. 3.o Action Area The project area includes the appr( National Gypsum's Wilmington fi Classification "SC") at approximate Hanover County. National Gypsum Drive, Wilmington, NC. The dredge4 navigable waters of the United Stag depths ranging from approximately dredging and past frequent use of th located within the project area. Refer National Gypsum Company unloai production at the wallboard plant a located on the east side of SR iloo property on the west side. The cone; River terminating on the shipping be. river. The existing berthing facility e. River, with a dock extending approxi. imately 2-acre proposed dredge area located at lity berth in the Cape Fear River (Stream Lat: 34.17375 N, Long:-75.957511 W in New Wilmington facility is located at 838 Sunnyvale naterial consists of sand, silt, and clay from the The project area is located in open water with 2 MLW to -37 MLW. Due to past maintenance area by large ships, submerged vegetation is not i Figure 3 for the Hydrographic Survey. gypsum at the shipping berth for wallboard ss River Road. The manufacturing facilities are th a conveyor belt crossing the highway to the continues along a pier extending into Cape Fear There is a paved access way from SR lioo to the nds approximately i,68o feet into the Cape Fear tely 195 feet to the north of the pier. The CDF is located in Brunswick County (Parcel No. o5900006) at approximately 34.176788 N,-77.963510 W, which is directly across the river from the proposed maintenance dredging area. The area where the dredged material will be stored is approximately 25 acres and has previously been used as a dredged material disposal facility. The adjacent property land use consists of mixed industrial and commercially developed properties. National Gypsum is located in a highly industrial area, with adjacent activities including fuel processing plants and commercial ports; all have commercial docks. The channel of the Cape Fear River is continually maintained for commercial navigation by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 4.o Alternatives Several alternatives were analyzed for this project, including the no build alternative, disposal at Eagle Island, agitation dredging, and the preferred alternative (private confined disposal facility). 4.1 No Build Alternative In the no -build alternative, the berthing area would not be dredged and National Gypsum would no longer be able to accept shipments into their Wilmington gypsum plant. This would lead to National Gypsum shutting down their plant operations in Wilmington, resulting in a loss of jobs and economic benefits to the City and State. 4.2 Eagle Island Disposal National Gypsum initially intended on using Disposal Facility Eagle Island for disposal of dredged material, however USACE requires that the same amount of material is removed that will be placed in this disposal area. National Gypsum would then have to place the material in another disposal location. Therefore, this disposal option would just create another step in the disposal process. 4.3 National Gypsum's National Gypsum considered disposi west of River Road. A wetland delini determine the feasibility of placing Based on these surveys, wetlands ai onsite disposal area, significantly de. In addition, due to the limited spa( extremely high, making this option n Site Disposal Alternative ; of the material in the approximately 8.2 acre area :ion and a tree survey were performed in order to redge material on National Gypsum's property. protected trees are located within the proposed using the available area to place dredge material. in this area, the dredge material would be piled feasible. 4.4 Offsite, Upland Disposal Alternative Offsite disposal facilities were identified. However, the dredge material must be dewatered before sending it to an offsite upland disposal facility. As discussed above, based on the wetland delineation and tree survey, there is limited space on National Gypsum's property to place material for dewatering. 4.5 Agitation Dredging Alternative Agitation dredging is ideal for shallow dredge depths (-2 feet). Although the majority of the proposed dredge area is shallow (2 feet or less), there are some areas that are greater than 2' that are proposed to be dredged for slope stabilization purposes. Since portions of the proposed dredge area are deeper than 2 feet, this form of dredging is not ideal. 4.6 Private Confined Disposal Facility (Preferred Alternative) National Gypsum identified a private County (Parcel No. 05900006) at app: directly across the river from the pro] previously been used to store dredge disposal. Due to the location and availa National Gypsum and the property ow. work. Refer to Appendix A for the Well 5.o Threatened, Endangered Urban identified all of the potential concern within New Hanover and Bra database (https://www.fvvs.gov/ralE below, lists the federal status, the conditions, and the population trend i concludes if the species are likely pi occurring in each county and the exi: in Table 1 was obtained from: the Na Wildlife Service databases htt s: raleigh/es tes.html). confined disposal facility located in Brunswick oximately 34-176788 N,-77.963510 W, which is osed maintenance dredging area. The area has material and is therefore suitable for dredge dlity of this CDF, this is the preferred alternative. .er are working together to make this alternative .nd Delineation Report. At Risk Species Effects Analysis angered and threatened species and species of rick Counties, based on the US Fish and Wildlife ' species /cn , list/ nc counties.html). Table i, my where the species is present, the habitat status of each species. The final column in Table it in the action area based on the proposed work conditions of the project area. The information it Marine Fisheries Service and the US Fish and .fisheries.noaa.gov/ and https://www.fws.gov/ TABLE is THREATENED & ENDANGERED & SPECIES OF CONCERN Species Name Federal County Discussion/Habitat Conditions Population Likely Status Status & in Trend Action Areas? American alligator T (similar) NH, B Threatened due to similar appearance; not subject to Section 7 consultation 5 M T NA American eel ARS B Muddy/silt-bottomed streams, rivers, <i M lbs T Y lakes, coastal waters Bald eagle BGPA NH, B Near wetlands, coasts, lakes, rivers, 9,700 pairs T Y marshes Black rail ARS NH Marshes and wet meadows 28,000-92,000 N 1 Carolina gopher ARS NH, B Southeastern Coastal Plain, stump 200-300 1 N frog holes, root tunnels Species Name Federal County Discussion/Habitat Conditions Population Likely Status Status & in Trend Action Areas? Carolina pygmy ARS B Ponds, ditches, streams in Coastal Unk 1 N sunfish Plain w/submerged & emergent aqua c vegetation Green sea turtle T NH, B Shallow coastal waters w/lush seagrass 85,000-90,000 N beds, beaches, inshore bays, lagoons females Hawksbill sea E NH, B Coastal reefs, rocky areas, estuaries, <25,000 N turtle lagoons females Kemp's ridley sea E NH, B Nearshore habitats w/muddy or sandy bottoms 25,000 T N turtle Leatherback sea E NH, B Coastal areas 34,000-36,00o N turtle I females 1 Loeeerhead sea T NH, B Coastal beaches 68,000-90,00o N turtle I nests/yr Northern lone- T NH Trees,lcaves Unk f N eared bat EMM plover T NH, B Coastal beaches <B,Soo adults N Red -cockaded E NH, B Forests w/trees 60-120 years old for 14,0001 N woodpecker roostin Red knot T NH, B Sandy�'beaches, saltmarshes, lagoons, r1 M 1 N mangrove swam s, estuaries and bays Southern hognose ARS NH, B Dryupland habitat Unk N snake Waccamaw T B Open ater in Lake Maccamaw Unk N silverside West Indian E NH, B Coastal areas, estuaries, saltwater bays, >13,000 T Y manatee canals rivers Wood stork T B Cypress mangroves and marshy >12,000 T Y woodlands Magnificent rams- ARS NH, B Submerged vegetation, Greenfield Unk N horn Lake, Orton Pond, Sand Hill Creek Pond,IMcKinzie Pond Rare skipper ARS NH, B Brackish river marshes Unk Y Carolina ARS NH, B Forested Areas Unk Y bisho weed Carolina bogmint ARS B Forested wetlands 27,900 25,200 Y T Cooley's E NH, B Circumneutral soils in grass -sedge Unk N meadowrue bogs & wet pine savannas. Fire plow lines, (roadside ditches, woodland clearings & powerline ROW Golden sedge ARS NH Sandy, wet soils w/pH between 5.5 and Unk T N 7.2. Ecotone between the pine savanna and adjacent wet hardwood or hardwood/conifer forest. Partially shaded savanna/swamp where fires favor6rbaceous ground layer and suppress shrub dominance Harper's ARS B Muddy shores, flatwoods, farm ponds, Unk Y fimbristylis silty sandbars in blackwater river Species Name Federal County Discussion/Habitat Conditions Population Likely Status Status & in Trend Action Areas? Purpledisk ARS B Wet pine flatwoods and savannas, Unk Y hone combhead seepage slopes, bo s wet ditches Raven's seedbox E NH, B Open, wet, peaty areas (ditches, Unk Y swamps, ponds, bogs) Rough -leaved E NH, B Ecotones between longleaf pine Unk N loosestrife uplands & pond pines on moist to seasonally saturated sands and on shallow organic soils overlaying sand. Fire plow lines, roadside ditches, woodland clearin s & owerline ROW Seabeach amaranth ARS NH, B Atlantic coastal beaches 50 POP-1 N Venus' fly -trap E NH, B Bogs and wet savannas, full sun 35,0001 N Wireleaf dropseed ARS B Moist savannas on flat terrain 30 pop. 1 Y Thin -wall quillwort ARS B Palustrine, forested wetland 10 sites Unk N E: Endangered T: Threatened BGPA: Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act ARS: At risk species 6.o Critical Habitats Only two critical habitats were identi 1) piping plover and 2) loggerhead sea beaches, therefore it is unlikely that ei area. In addition, based on the mar neither the piping plover nor loggerh More details on the information of constituent elements for each critical 6.1 Piping Plover NH: New Hanover pop: Populations B: Brunswick Unk: Unknown M: Million �d within New Hanover and Brunswick counties; .rtle. Both of these species habitats include coastal er of these species will be found within the project in the applicable Federal Register publications, d sea turtle are present within the project areas. Lined in the Federal Register and the primary Lbitat are discussed below. According to Federal Register Vol. 66, 0.132,JUIY10,2001(https://www.govinfo.gov/ content/ pkg/FR-2001-07-to/pdf/oi- 6go5.pdf), neither the proposed dredging area nor the proposed dredge disposal area are ilocated in a piping plover designated habitat unit. Primary constituent elements essential for the conservation of piping plovers are those habitat components that support foraging, roosting, and sheltering and physical features necessary for maintaining the natural Orocesses that support these habitat components. The primary constituent elements include intertidal beaches and flats and associated dune systems and flats above annual high tide. Important components of intertidal flats include sand and/or mud flats with no for very sparse emergent vegetation. In some cases, these flats may be covered or partially covered by a mat of blue-green algae. Adjacent non - or sparsely vegetated sand, mud, or algal flats above high tide are also important, especially for roosting piping plovers and are primary constituent elements of piping plover wintering habitat. Such sites may have debris, detritus, or micro -topographic relief offering refuge from high winds and cold weather. Important components of the beach/dune ecosystem include surfcast algae, sparsely vegetated backbeach and salterns, spits, and washover areas. Washover areas are broad, unvegetated zones, with little or no topographic relief, that are formed and maintained by the action of hurricanes, storm surge, or other extreme wave action. 6.2 Loggerhead Sea Turtle According to Federal Register Vol. 76, No. 132, July 10, 2014 (httl2s://www.govinfo.gov /content/ pkg/FR-2014-o7-io/pdf/2014-1.748.T)df), neither the proposed dredging area nor the proposed dredge disposal area are located in a designated critical habitat area for the loggerhead sea turtle. Primary constituent elements are assigned for neritic and sargassam habitat. These are detailed in the Federal Register Vol. 76, 132, July 10, 2014. 7.0 Conclusions and Based on the characteristics of the proposed project location, the following species from Table i were identified as potentially located within the project area: American Eel, Bald Eagle, West Indian Manatee, Wood Stork, Rare Skipper, Carolina Bogmint, Carolina Bishopweed, Harper's Fimbristylis, Purpledisk Honeycombhead, Raven's seedbox, Wireleaf Dropseed. The remaining species listed in Table' i are not likely to be located within the either because they were not identified in the county where the work is occurring or the proposed work will not occur in the lhabitats associated with the identified species. Therefore, these species were not analyzed further in this assessment. 7A General Impacts The maintenance dredge area has been have been moving through the proje Gypsum plant was closed between 20, includes heavy shipping industries and the project area. General impacts fi Additional discussion on each of the Sections 7.2 through 7.5. Short-term impacts to the project area area. As a commercial and industrial disposal area) experiences a wide rang has the typical noise characteristics a commercial vessel traffic, and dock sid( whistles and various motors for pro trucks, cars, and loading and unload include sounds wind waves, fish, tidal not anticipated to significantly raise 1 dredging will only take up to 2 weeks preparation will take approximately 2 utilized as a shipping berth since 3-975; large ships :t area since that time. Although the National i9 and 2o18, this portion of the Cape Fear River therefore large ships have continued to pass near )m the proposed project are discussed below, dentified potential listed species is provided in can occur due to noise and turbidity in the project area, the project area (both the dredge area and of noise from a variety of industrial activities and a busy harbor. Sources include recreational and facilities. Noise sources for vessels include cranes, )ulsion. Dockside noise sources include cranes, ing equipment. Other sources of ambient noise currents, and mammals. The proposed project is he noise levels in the area and the maintenance ; work associated with pipe placements and CDF 0 4 weeks. i Species maybe affected by noise from dredges associated with construction activities, but it will be intermittent and will not occur in any one area for any appreciable period of time. Due to the mobility of the species identified, they would likely move away from the source of noise. The maintenance dredging will not restrict movement of species in the area, and there are ample similar habitats adjacent to the project site where species can move. Foraging habitats may also suffer some indirect effects, including temporary increases to turbidity and sedimentation on foraging habitat within the indirect impact zone for the project. However, implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs)/minimization measures should minimize effects associated with turbidity and sedimentation, and they are not expected to be any greater than the effects commonly experienced in this area due to the passage of storms. j The maintained deep waters of the n water aquatic bottom habitat. BMPs, a turbidity curtain will minimize poll 7.2 Fish The American eel is an "At Risk Spe American eel are nocturnal species, eels may be present in the Cape F proposed dredge times. In addition, the project occurs in open water, we Because it is anticipated that the ai injury from noise is extremely unlik only be conducted during daylight he night hours to transit through the n adversely affect the American eel. 7.3 Birds and Insects Bald Eagles, Wood Storks, and Rare adjacent to the dredge disposal area. are unlikely to impact the nesting or vegetation is anticipated to be remov area will not change. In addition, the project will not likely adversely affect 7.4 Mammals West Indian Manatee are seasonal ii occurrences from June to October. To measures for general construction ha: Implementation of these measures v lance dredge area will not allow for shallow Aled and monitored effluent, and the use of into the water from the proposed project. ' potentially located within the Cape Fear River. mining and eating at night. Although American River, they are typically not active during the to the mobility of the American eel, and because act them to move away from noise disturbances. it will move away, an animal suffering physical 0 occur and is therefore discountable. Work will therefore, the American eel in the area will have tenance dredge area. This project will not likely ippers are found in habitats similar to the area discussed above, the noise and project activities ;ding patterns of these species. Minimal tree or as part of the project and the uses of the project iintenance dredging is a short -tern project. This Id Eagles, Wood Storks or Rare Skippers. ibitants of North Carolina, with most reported otect manatees in North Carolina, precautionary been prepared by the Fish and Wildlife Service. allow in -water projects, which do not require blasting, to proceed without adverse impacts to manatees. The precautionary measures are attached to this assessment. This project will not likely adversely affect West Indian Manatees. Refer to Appendix B for the Guidelines for Avoiding Impacts to the West Indian Manatee. 7.5 Plants The following "At Risk" plant species are present in habitat with characteristics of the project area: Carolina Bogmint, Carolina Bishopweed, Harper's Fimbristylis, Purpledisk Honeycombhead, Raven's seedbox, Wireleaf Dropseed. It is unlikely that any of these species are present within the project area because they do not grow in open water. In addition, a wetland delineation was performed for the confined disposal facility on February 26, 202o and none of these species were identified during the wetland delineation. Therefore, this project will1likely have no effect on these species. 8.o Literature Cited Federal Register Vol. 66, No. 132, J Federal Register Vol. 76, No. 132, pkg/FR-2014-07-1o/pdf/2014-1574� US Fish and Wildlife Service Raleigh West Indian Manatee." Revised June National Marine (https://www.fisheries.i US Army Corps of Engineers and Regional Biological Opinion for Southeast United States (2020 SA US Fish and Wildlife Service E by County for North Carolina nc_counties.html). US Fish and Wildlife Service Section Assessment (https://www.fws.gov/ir 10, 2001 (https://www.govinfo.gov/content/ 10, 2014 (https://www.govinfo.gov/content/ Office. "Guidelines for Avoiding Impacts to the Service Species Database of Ocean Energy Management. "South Atlantic na and Material Placement Activities in the 27, 2020. and Threatened Species and Species of Concern (https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/ dtation Guidance for Preparing a Biological endangered/section7/ba_guide.html). 10 17' C$$¢ R n�• ��J"20 8'Google Appendix A Wetland Delineation Report • 0 Appendix A: Wetland Report Soil & Environmental 8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 satdec.com To: Urban Engineers, Inc. Attn: Jennifer Waters 530 Walnut St. Philadelphia, PA 19106 Re: Wetland Delineation and Stream Evaluation National Gypsum Site (Dredge Disposal Area) Wilmington, NC Consultants, PA Fhoue: (919) 846-5900 • Fax: (919) 846-9467 March 9, 2020 S&EC Project No.: 13870.W6 Ms. Waters: On February 26, 2020, S&EC personnel completed the wetland delineation and stream evaluation on the National Gypsum Property (Dredge Disposal Area) in Wilmington, NC. You will find the attached report detailing our findings. Maps that further docu ent the wetland and stream related site characteristics are also attached. The next step in the wetland and stream verification process is to visit the site with the Army Corps of Engineers' agent for Brunswick County, as well as a representative from DCM to review the potential CAMA wetlands onsite. S&EC will schedule this site visit at your request. As youmoveforward in planning your development, S&EC personnel are available for site plan review and permit consultation services. Please contact S&EC if you have any questions related to wetland and stream regulations or if you need clarification of the attached report. Sincerely, SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL Steven Ball, RF, PWS Project Manager Attachments: 1) Wetland Delineation Report 2) USGS site vicinity map 3) NRCS Soil Survey 4) Wetland & Stream Sketch Map 5) Agent Authorization Foml PA Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Slute 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: (919) 846-5900 • Fax: (919) 846-9467 sendeacom DETAILED WETLAND DELINEATION FOR THE NATIONAL GYPSUM SITE (DREDGE DISPOSAL AREA) On FEBRUARY 26, 2020, S&EC personnel completed a detailed wetland delineation and stream evaluation on the National Gypsum Site (Dredge Disposal Area) (140 acres). The site is located on an island directly across the Cape Fear River to the west from 838 Sunnyvale Dr, Wilmington, NC 28412. Figure I and Figure 2 show the location of the site on a USGS topographic quadrangle and NRCS County Soil Survey, respectively. I _ We have determined that wetlands general the site. The attached wetland sketch map wetlands identified during our evaluation. recommendations section below for more account for the jurisdictional waters observed on :picts the approximate locations of streams and ease refer to the sketch map and the results and ailed information. SCOPE OF WORK The detailed wetland delineation consistedlof traversing the property to examine soils; vegetation, and hydrology across the site in search of areas that meet the criteria for jurisdictional wetlands as described by the procedures set forth in the Corps ofEneineers Wetlands LMUCGL11I1 MUILLIM tJa11Ud1Y IYO/ —rLLIM Areas on the site with positive indicators c presence of hydrophytic vegetation were f. flagging. Proof of wetland hydrology wot channels in the upper 12 inches of the soil drainage patterns, regional indicators of se and perennial stream channels, ponds, and Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) as wa waters may also be referred to asjurisdicti jurisdiction of the USACE. It is important the US and regulated by the USACE under The results of the detailed wetland Wetlands and Jurisdictional Waters: ' hydric soils, evidence of wetland hydrology, and igged with sequentially numbered, orange S&EC logo d be the existence of hydric soils with oxidized root lrofile, water borne deposits, drift lines, scour marks, 1 saturation, etc. Surface waters such as intermittent lakes, which are also subject to regulation by the US' ers of the US, were also identified. These surface final waters to indicate that they are within the to note that wetlands are also classified as waters of authority of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). and stream evaluation are discussed below. We have determined thatjurisdictional waiters (i.e., wetlands) exist on the site. Please refer to the attached "Wetland Sketch Map" for specific flag numbers and approximate locations. &@EC Project #: 13870. W6 March 9, 2020 March 9, 2020 S&sEC Project #: 13870.W6 Page 2 of 3 Surface waters on this site flow into the Cape Fear River in which has been classified in "Classification and NC DWQ Standards Applicable to Surface Waters and Wetlands of North Carolina" as SC. Section 404 and CAMA Wetlands The wetlands onsite were identified as being a Estuarine Woody Wetland and Salt/Brackish Marsh (CAMA) type as outlined in the publication "NCWAM Manual." This wetland type is common throughout the estuaries and coastal rivers in North Carolina that contain tidal influence. Please note that there are likely CAMA (Coastal Area Management Act) wetlands onsite that are approximately shown on the attached sketch. A representative from CAMA/DCM will need to confirm these wetlands. The site is also likely located within the "Areas of Environmental Concern" (AEC) as designated by the Coastal Resources Commission. This site will likely contain a 75' buffer from the Normal High -Water Line of the Cape Fear River (Public Tnrst Waters). All S&EC flags comprising the wetland and jurisdictional waters delineation should be surveyed for use in site planning and USACE approval and permitting. Please have the property owner or contracting buyer complete the attached agent authorization form if you would like S&EC to act on their behalf for requesting approval of the wetland delineation. This form will also be used in preparing a permit application for impacts to wetlands or surface waters when we are provided with a plan showing the proposed impacts. S&EC cannot conduct correspondence with the USACE unless we have agent authorization (see attached Agent Authorization). This authorization form must be filled out in its entirety and returned to S&EC (a faxed copy is acceptable). Regulations A general list of regulations that apply to jurisdictional wetlands and waters present on the site are discussed below. Please be aware that other local, state, and federal regulations not included in this list may also apply. S&EC personnel are available to discuss these regulations as they apply to your project. Wetland Permitting: The current Nationwide Permits were issued by the USACE on March 18, 2017. The USACE Wilmington District issued revised Regional Conditions for the 2017 Nationwide Permits. We recommend you forward a conceptual site plan to.our office for review by one of our permitting specialists, who can best advise you of the specific permitting needs as you progress through the planning process. '"North Carolina Wetland Assessment Method. March 9, 2020 S&EC Project #: 13870. W6 Pa.-e 3 of 3 Generally, wetland impact permits are issued on a per -project basis as determined by the USACE. The USACE has determined that impacts on parcels sub -divided from larger tracts are sometimes considered to be cumulative to existing impacts for the large tract. If this is the case, then thresholds for notification may not apply to your project and impacts to streamshvetlands mast be considered in light of existing permits. Limitations Our evaluations, conclusions, and recommendations are based on project and site information available to us at the time of this report and may require modification if there are any changes in the project or site conditions, or if additional data about the project or site becomes available in the future. This report is intended for use by Urban Engineers on this project. These findings are not intended or recommended to be suitable for reuse on extensions of the project or on any other project. Reuse on extensions of this project or on any other project shall be done only after written verification or adaptation by SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA, for the specific purpose intended. CONCLUSION The wetland and stream delineation for the National Gypsum Site (Dredge Disposal Area) was completed by S&EC on February 26, 2020. This site contains jurisdictional streams and wetland areas that may require preconstruction authorization for impacts, depending on the size and nature of the impact (i.e. road construction; lot fill, stormwater pond construction, etc.). USACE and CAMA (DCM) verification of our site;assessment should be obtained. Following verification meetings with regulatory agencies, the next step in the stream and Wetland identification and permitting process is to obtain a field survey of our delineation for formal approval by, the USACE. Upon completing the survey, these site constraints may then be integrated into planning for property development. Dam"Tr e_ l i Four th East i Jetty R�ang.e Larks d stand 1 t ^ 1 ♦AL -:- .. . - ,., f {'t 5� 4„ �u Brunsrwtck j" Rarlge 4� 'Ll_'N&'C64r for C,Apgl hjcln[onnafion &�iAnzlysis'' Project Number: Map Title: N- 13870.W6 0 1,000 2,000 Figure 1 -USES Map Project Manager. T I 1, t I I I I National Gypsum Feet w r_ $B (Dredge DlsposalArea) ?tale: 1 0 1000' New Hanover County, NC Date: Source: Soil :& Environmental Consultants, PA n,)rnoronon 2019 NC Wilmington Quad a.n(a+wnw:..w'. in�,�iuu. n� mn.e.+m•r,.:pol Soil & ]Environmental Consultants, PA 8419 Falls of Neese Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone (919) 846-5900 • Fas: (919) W-9J67 smtdcc.com PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION / AGENT AUTHORIZATION Project Name/Description: J • 6VP641"q iS 454( {4Utrk, S&EC Project#/�ii %d Date: -Yi`zo The Department of the Army U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington 69 Darlington Avenue Wilmington, NC 28403 Attn: 4M6k1errField Office: _ I, the undersigned, a duly authorized own herein, do authorize representatives of thi (Corps) and Soil & Environmental Consult property herein described for the purpose determination associated with Waters of t 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Sectior document also authorizes S&EC,,as my ag necessary for the processing, issuance ani all associated standard and special conditi correspondence concerning the agent for NOTICE: This authorization, for liability government officials to enter the proper S&EC to arrange a site meeting prior to PARCEL INFORMATION: Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 31 Site Address: 12 City, County, State: S( PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: Name: BLT TruE Mailing Address: _ Telephone Number: (please print) A We hereby certify the above information the best of our knowledge. r of record of the property/properties identified Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers its, PA (S&EC) staff, as my agent, to enter upon the )f conducting on -site investigations and issuing a e U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. This nt, to act on my behalf and take all actions acceptance of a permit or certification and any and ns.This notification supersedes any previous lis project. professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for ten accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call iq the site. :Yhbc Date Ot'!S1%-G r�faOC-ca<7o✓IS�Q,yi�crµ,r-o(t�• I, P11ant: ylo L•'-170 —j 9 � � nlu��e,rar) rrPc� oor71 ,mitted in this application is true and accurate to�j U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control g: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET— Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT. See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) Project/Site: National Gypsum (Disposal Area) City/County: Wilmington/Brunswick Sampling Date: 02/26/2020 Applicant/Owner: BLT Trust (Mark Sanders) State: NC Sampling Point: DP1 Investigator(s): S&EC - Steven Ball & Joshua Harvey Section, Township, Range: NA Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): none Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T, MLRA 153A Let: 34.176772 Lang:-77.962325 Datum: NAD 1983 Soil Map Unit Name: N/A NWI classification: PEM5Rd Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil _, or Hydrology _significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes x No_ Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No _ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No_ Welland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that ao 1v) _Surface Soil Cracks (86) _Surface Water (At) _Aquatic Fauna 5813) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) X High Water Table (A2) Deposits (IBIS) (LRR U) Patterns (B10) —Marl x Saturation (A3) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) —Drainage —Moss Trim Lines (B16) Marks (Bt) RhizoslIp�heres on Living Roots (C3) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) —Water _Oxidized _Sediment Deposits (B2) _Presence of Repuced Iron (C4) _ _Crayfish Burrows (C8) Deposits (B3) Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _Drift _Recent Mat or Crust (84) Muck Surface (C7) _Saturation x Geomorphic Position (D2) _Algal _Thin _Iron Deposits (135) _Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) —inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) X FAC-Neutral Test IDS) x Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _Sphagnum Moss (08) (LRR T, U) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes_ No x Depth inches): Water Table Present? Yes x No Depth (inches): 0 Saturation Present? Yes x No _ Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No (includes capillary fringe Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: ENG FORM 6116-2SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain —Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DPI Absolute Dominant Indicator 1 Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'r ) % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: " 1. Ulmus amedcana 10 Yes FAC Number of Dominant Species 2. Chamaecyparis thyoides 10 Yes OBL That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A) 3. Total Number of Dominant 4. Species Across All Strata: 6 (B) 5. Percent of Dominant Species 6. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83.3% (A/B) 7. Prevalence Index worksheet: 8. Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 20 =Total Cover OBL species 40 x 1 = 40 50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4 FACW species 0 x 2 = 0 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'r ) FAC species 40 x 3 = 120 1. Morelia cerifera 20 Yes FAC FACU species 20 x 4 = 80 2. Ligustrum sinense 10 1 Yes FAC UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 3. Quercus virginiana 20 Yes FACU Column Totals: 100 (A) 240 (B) 4. Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.40 5. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 6. _ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 7. X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 8. X 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0' 50-IITotal Cover _Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 50% of total cover: 25 20% bf total cover: 10 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'r ) 1. Scirpus cemuus 30 Yes OBL 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must bx 2. present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 3. 4. Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 5• more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 6. height. 7. Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less 8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. 9. 10. Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless 11 • of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 12. 30 =Total Cover Woody Vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6 height. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'r ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Hydrophytic Total Cover Vegetation 50% of total cover: 20%I of total cover: Present? Yes X No Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.) ENG FORM 6116.2SG, JUL 2018 1 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0 6Y9]L Sampling Point: DPI Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0-4 10YR 2/1 100 4-16 10YR 3/2 90 10YR4/6 Sandy 10 C M Sandy Prominent redox concentrations Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol (At) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) _ Hisfic Epipedon (A2) —Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12) _2 cm Muck (Al0) (LRR S) —Black Histic (A3) (MLRA 153B, 153D) _Coast Prairie Redox (A16) _Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) —Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) (outside MLRA 150A) _Stratified Layers (A5) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _Reduced Verlic (1718) _Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T. U) _Depleted Matrix (F3) (outside MLRA 150A, 1508) _ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _Redox Dark Surface (F6) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T) _Muck Presence (AS) (LRR U) _Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20) _ 1 cm Muck (AS) (LRR P, T) _Redox Depressions (F8) (MLRA 153B) Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1) (F10) (LRR U) Red Parent Material (1721) _ _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _Marl _ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) _ _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Prairie Redox (Al 6) (MLRA 150A)_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) (outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154) —Coast _Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _ Umbric Surface (1713) (LRR P, T, U) _ Barrier Islands Low Chrome Matrix (TS7) —Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) —Delta Ochric (FA7) (MLRA 151) (MLRA 1538, 153D) X Sandy Redox (S5) Reduced Verticll (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) (Explain in Remarks) Matrix (S6) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) —Other _Stripped Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) _ Bright Floodplain Soils (F20) _Dark Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) _Anomalous (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and (LRR S, T, U) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) wetland hydrology must be present, (MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes_ No_ Remarks: ENG FORM 6116.2SG, JUL 2018 1 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT. See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) ► Project/Site: National Gypsum (Disposal Area) City/County: Wilmington/Brunswick Sampling Date: 02/26/2020 Applicant/Omer.. BLT Trust (Mark Sanders) State: NC Sampling Point: DP2 Investigator(s): S&EC - Steven Ball & Joshua Harvey Section, Township, Range: NA Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): none Loral relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T, MLRA 153A Let: 34.175139 Long:-77.963119 Datum: NAD 1983 Soil Map Unit Name: N/A NWI classification: PSS1Sd Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No _ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation _, Soil _, or Hydrology _significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes x No_ Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes_ No X within a Wetland? Yes_ No X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes_ No X Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two recuiredl Primary Indicators (minimum of one is recuired: check all that aooly) _Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _Surface Water (Al) _Aquatic Fauna (613) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Water Table (A2) Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Patterns (B10) _High _Marl (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _Drainage Moss Trim Lines (B16) _Saturation _ _Water Marks (Bt) _Oxidized RhizosIpheres on Living Roots (C3) _ _Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) _Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) —Recent — Iron Re',jfuction in Tilled Soils (C6) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Mat or Crust (134) Muck Surface (C7) Position (D2) _Algal _Thin _ Iron Deposits (135) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _Geomorphic _Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes_ No x Depth inches): Water Table Present? Yes_ No x Depth Sinches): Saturation Present? Yes_ No __x_ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes_ No_ (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 1 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. sampling Point: DP2 Absolute 'Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'r ) % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: 1. Populus deltoides 30 Yes FAC Number of Dominant Species 2. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A) 3. Total Number of Dominant 4. Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) 5. Percent of Dominant Species 6. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B) 7. Prevalence Index worksheet: 8. Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 30 =Total Cover OBL species 20 x 1 = 20 50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6 FACW species 0 x 2 = 0 Saolino/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'r ) FAC species 70 x 3 = 210 1. Populus de/toides 30 1 Yes FAC FACU species 0 x 4 = 0 2. Chamaecyparis thyoides 20 Yes OBL UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 3. Column Totals: 90 (A) 230 (B) 4. Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.56 5. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 6. _ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 7. X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 8. - Prevalence Index is :53.0' 50 ITotal Cover _3 _Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover. 10 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'r ) 1. Andropogon virginicus 10 Yes FAC 'Indicators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrology must be 2. present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 3. 4. Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 5, more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 6 height. 7. Sapling/Shrub- Woody plants, excluding vines, less 8' than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 It (1 m) tall. 9. 10. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless 11. of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 8 tall. 12. 10 Total Cover Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2 height. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'r ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. rTotal Cover 50% of total cover: 20%l of total cover: Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.) Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No ENG FORM 6116.2SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DP2 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks 0-16 2.5Y 6/4 100 Sandy 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol (At) _Thin Dark Surtaice (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) Hislic Epipedon (A2) -Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12) cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) _ —Black Histic (A3) (MLRA 153Bi 153D) _2 _Coast Pmide Redox (At 6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _Loamy Mucky lylineral (Ft) (LRR O) (outside MLRA 150A) Layers (A5) Gleyed atdx (F2) Vertic (F18) _Stratified Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _Loamy Matrix (F3) _Reduced (outside MLRA 150A, 150B) _Organic _5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _Depleted _Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _ Redox Depressions (F8) (MLRA 153B) _Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) _Marl (F10) (LRR U) _Red Parent Material (F21) Dark Surface (Al2) Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Shallow Dark Surface (F22) _Thick i� _Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_ _Depleted Iron-Manganes� Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) _Very (outside MLRA 138, 152A In FL, 154) _Sandy Mucky Mineral (St) (LRR O, S) Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) _ Barrier Islands Low Chrome Matrix (TS7) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Della Ochric (FA7) (MLRA 151) (MLRA 153B, 153D) _Sandy Redox (S5) _ Reduced Verticl (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) _Other (Explain in Remarks) Matrix (S6) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) _Stripped _ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) 8dght Floodplain Soils (F20) _ _Anomalous Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and (LRR S, T, U) _Very Shallow rk Surface (F22) wetland hydrology must be present, (MLRA 138, 52A in FL, 154) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X ENG FORM 6116.2SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0 aaluuuyv uuipul :tsaM auk. of s:taudu I 2uipioAV .ioj sauilaping g xipuaddV Appendix B: Guidelines for Avoiding Impacts to the West Indian Manatee United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Raleigh Field Office Post Office Box 33726 Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726 GUIDELINES FOR AVOIDING IMPACTS TO THE WEST INDIAN MANATEE Precautionary Measures for Construction Activities in North Carolina Waters The West Indian manatee (Trichechus manatus), also known as the Florida manatee, is a Federally -listed endangered aquatic mammal protected under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended (16 U.S.0 1461 et seq.). The manatee is also listed as endangered under the North Carolina Endangered Species Act of 1987 (Article 25 of Chapter 113 of the General Statutes). The U.S. Fish land Wildlife Service (Service) is the lead Federal agency responsible for the protection and recovery of the West Indian manatee under the provisions of the Endangered Species Act. Adult manatees average 10 feet Ion individuals have been recorded at ler 3,500 pounds. Manatees are commol including shallow coastal bays, lagoi extremes. Manatees spend much of them difficult to detect even in shallov the United States is Florida, the sp( Carolina with most occurrences repo and weigh about 2,200 pounds, although some hs greater than 13 feet and weighing as much as found in fresh, brackish, or marine water habitats, s, estuaries, and inland rivers of varying salinity eir time underwater or partly submerged, making ✓ater. While the manatee's principal stronghold in es is considered a seasonal inhabitant of North id from June through October. To protect manatees in North Carolina, the Service's Raleigh Field Office has prepared precautionary measures for general construction activities in waters used by the species. Implementation of these measure will allow in -water projects which do not require blasting to proceed without adverse impacts to manatees. In addition, inclusion of these guidelines as conservation measures in a Biological Assessment or Biological Evaluation, or as part of the determination of impacts on the manatee in an environmental document prepared pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act, will expedite the Service's review of the document for the fulfillment of requirements under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. These measures include: 1. The project manager and/or contractor will inform all personnel associated with the project that manatees may be present)n the project area, and the need to avoid any harm to these endangered mammals. The project manager will ensure that all construction personnel know the general appearance of the species and their habit of moving about completely or partially submerged in sshallow, water. All construction personnel will be informed that they are responsible for observing water -related activities for the presence of manatees. 2. The project manager and/or the contractor will advise all construction personnel that there are civil and criminal penalties for harming, harassing, or killing manatees which are protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act and the Endangered Species Act. 3. If a manatee is seen within 100 yards of the active construction and/or dredging operation or vessel movement, all appropriate precautions will be implemented to ensure protection of the manatee. These precautions will include the immediate shutdown of moving equipment if a manatee comes within 50 feet of the operational area of the equipment. Activities will not resume until the manatee has departed the project area on its own volition (i.e., it may not be herded or harassed from the area). 4. Any collision with and/or injury to a manatee will be reported immediately. The report must be made to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (ph. 919.856.4520 ext. 16), the National Marine Fisheries Service (ph. 252.728.8762), and the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (ph. 252.448.1546). 5. A sign will be posted in all vessels associated with the project where it is clearly visible to the vessel operator. The sign should state: CAUTION: The endangered mana months, primarily from June throul this vessel in shallow water during t if a manatee comes within 50 feet c with and/or injury to the manatee m Wildlife Service (919-856-4520 e: (252.728.8762), and the North (252.448.1546). 6. The contractor will maintain a manatees during project activities. l prepare a report which summarizes the report to the Service's Raleigh I may occur in these waters during the warmer October. Idle speed is required if operating .se months. All equipment must be shutdown the vessel or operating equipment. A collision ;t be reported immediately to the U.S. Fish and 16), the National Marine Fisheries Service Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 1 detailing sightings, collisions, and/or injuries to n completion of the action, the project manager will information on manatees encountered and submit d Office. 7. All vessels associated with the construction project will operate at "no wake/idle" speeds at all times while in water where thedraft of the vessel provides less than a four foot clearance from the bottom. All vessel will follow routes of deep water whenever possible. 8. If siltation barriers must be placed in shallow water, these barriers will be: (a) made of material in which manatees cannot become entangled; (b) secured in a manner that they cannot break free and entangle manatees; and, (c) regularly monitored to ensure that manatees have not become entangled. Barriers will be placed in a manner to allow manatees entry to or exit from essential habitat. Prepared by (rev. 06/2003): U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Raleigh Field Office Post Office Box 33726 Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726 919/856-4520 I Figure 1. The whole body of the West Indian manatee may be visible in clear water; but in the dark and muddy waters of coastal North Carolina, one normally sees only a small part of the head when the manatee raises its nose to breathe. Illustration used with the permission of the North Carolina State Museum of Natural Sciences. Source: Clark, M. K. 1987. Endangered,, Threatened, and Rare Fauna of North Carolina: Part I. A re-evaluation of the mammals. Occasional Papers of the North Carolina Biological Survey 1987- 3. North Carolina State Museum of Natural Sciences. Raleigh, NC. pp. 52. Q 14k North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Coastal Management Major Permit Application m Section lS—Sediment Sampling J� uRean■ CAMA MAJOR PERMIT APPLICATION SECTION 15 - SEDIMENT SAMPLING Tier II sediment sampling was performed in the proposed maintenance dredge area in November 2019 by Terracon Consultants, Inc. Sampling was performed in accordance with the USACE Sediment Testing Guidelines for Dredged Material Proposed for Disposal in Federal Project Disposal Areas by Applicants (May 12009). Sediment samples were also analyzed for CFR 258 Appendix I volatile organic compounds and metals. The results of the analytical testing indicated detections of arsenic, cobalt and mercury about screening levels. Refer to attached Tier II Sediment Sampling Report for the results. On January 8, 2020 and May 4, 2020; Urban received confirmation from the NCDEQ Solid Waste Section that the dredged material may be transported to a designated CDF (refer to the attached emails from Ervin Lane, Hydrogeologist from the NCDEQ Solid Waste Section). • • Tier II Sediment Sampling Report National Gypsum Company 838 Sunnyvale Drive Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina i December 31, 2019 Terracon Project No. ES197346 Prepared for: Urban Engineers, Inc. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Prepared by: Terracon Consultants, Inc. Savannah, Georgia A Irerracon December 31, 2019 Urban Engineers, Inc. 530 Walnut Street Philidelphia, Pennsylvania 19106 Attn: Ms. Jennifer Waters, PE E: jlwaters@urbanengineers.com Re: Tier II Sediment Sampling Report National Gypsum Company 838 Sunnyvale Drive Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina Terracon Project No. ES197346 Dear Ms. Waters: Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) is pleased to submit the following Tier 11 Sediment Sampling Report for the above -referenced project' This report includes a description of our sampling methods, analytical test methods, test results, data evaluation, and our conclusions and recommendations. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. If you have any questions concerning this report, or if we may be of further service, please contact us. Sincerely, Terracon Consultants, Inc. Leah Moore, EIT Stewart A. Dixon, PG Senior Staff Environmental Engineer Principal / Environmental Department Manager Terracon Consultants, Inc. 2201 Rowland Avenue Savannah, Georgia 31404 P (912) 629 4000 F (912) 629 4001 terracon.com/savannah TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. 1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................1 1.1 Site Description....................................................................................................1 1.2 Project Description...............................................................................................2 1.3 Scope of Work.....................................................................................................2 1.4 Standard of Care..................................................................................................3 1.5 Additional Scope Limitations................................................................................3 1.6 Reliance...............................................................................................................3 2.0 FIELD SAMPLING AND LABORATORY METHODS.....................................................4 2.1 Sediment Sampling.............................................................................................4 2.2 Equipment DecontaminatioIn................................................................................5 2.3 Sample Processing and Ar)alysis.........................................................................6 2.4 Deviations and Difficulties Encountered...............................................................7 3.0 LABORATORY TEST I RESULTS ND DISCUSSION....................................................8 3.1 Sediment Physical Characeristics....................................................................8 ...teristics 3.2 Sediment Chemical Characteristics ......................................................................9 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMHNDATIONS.............................................................10 TABLES Table 1 Sediment Sample IDs and GP�S Coordinates Table 2 Laboratory Analyses and Associated EPA Methods Performed Table 3 Sediment Core Recoveries anr� Notes Table 4 Sediment Sand / Silt / Clay Fractions Table 5 Sediment Sample Detections APPENDICES APPENDIX A Figure 1 - Topographic) Map Figure 2 - Site Diagram) Figure 3 - Sample Loc9tion Map APPENDIX B Field Sampling Documentation Notes APPENDIX C Sediment Physical La )oratory Reports APPENDIX D Sediment Analytical Laboratory Reports Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable TIER II SEDIMENT SAMPLING REPORT National Gypsum Company 838 Sunnyvale Drive Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina Terracon Project No. ES197346 December 31, 2019 1.0 INTRODUCTION Terracon understands Urban Engineers, Inc. (the Client) is assisting the Wilmington, North Carolina National Gypsum Company (NGC)facility in performing pre -dredging sediment sampling and analysis in support of the facility's proposed maintenance dredging project. The project includes dredging existing sediments along the facility's berth to a depth of -36 feet Mean Low Water (MLW) plus 2-feet of overdredge (-38 feet MLW). Approximately 17,000-cubic yards (based on October 2018 bathymetric data) of sediments are anticipated to be dredged and disposed of in a confined disposal facility (CDF). The final disposal facility has yet to be determined but will be either a privately -owned CDF directly across Cape Fear River from the NGC berth or the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) -owned Eagle Island CDF located upriver of the berth. As part of the dredge permitting activities, Tier II sediment sampling, analysis, and evaluation was conducted on the proposed material to be dredged and disposed of in an off -site CDF. Five (5) sediment samples were collected from representative locations within the project's dredge footprint to characterize the physical and chemical qualities of the marine sediments to be dredged. 1.1 Site Description Site,Name� „°', NationahGypsum' Company * Berth at 838 Sunnyvale Drive within the Cape Fear River Site Location/Address GPS coordinates: 34.17340,-77.95730; Wilminaton. New Hanover Countv. North Carolina Site Improvements The subject site consists of previously dredged open water between the existing NGC berth and the Cape Fear River channel line. The subject site is located within the Cape Fear River adjacent to the NGC Wilmington, North Carolina facility addressed as 838 Sunnyvale Drive. The site location and area topography are depicted on Figure 1 of Appendix A as a reproduced from portion of the 2019 Wilmington, North Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 1 Tier II Sediment Sampling Report 1 ��rracon National Gypsum Company ■ Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina December 31, 2019 ■ Terracon Project No. ES197346 Carolina U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute series topographic quadrangle map. An aerial view of the site, surrounding area, and potential CDFs for the project are shown on Figure 2. 1.2 Project Description The subject site consists of an approximate 2.0-acre area of previously dredged open water between the existing NGC berth and the Cape Fear River channel line in Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina. The project consists of dredging approximately 17,000-cubic yards of existing material to maintain a dredge depth of -36 feet MLW, plus 2-feet of overdredge (-38 feet MLW). 1.3 Scope of Work Terracon completed a Tier II marine sediment investigation for the NGC maintenance dredging project located on the Cape Fear River it Wilmington, North Carolina. In accordance with the October 2019 Marine Sediment SamplingWork Plan (Work Plan) provided by the Client, five (5) sediment samples were collected for the Investigation. The sediment samples were collected to a depth of -38 feet MLW, as able, as specified in the Work Plan. The purpose of the study was to characterize the physical and chemical qualities of the marine sediments within the proposed dredge limits by the following: Collection of sediment samples that adequately characterize the project's dredged materials. Analysis of the dredged material information to determine if the se Documentation of the field s sediments and quality control s chemically and physically in order to provide are contaminated. and results of physical and chemical analyses of Table 1 on the following page lists the sample IDs, sample information, and Global Positioning System (GPS) coordinates for the sediment samples collected. Figure 3 in Appendix A illustrates the sample locations for the investigation. Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 2 Tier II Sediment Sampling Report National Gypsum Company a Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina December 31, 2019 ■ Terracon Project No. ES197346 Table 1: Sediment Sample IDs and GPS Coordinates lrerracon Sample ID I Latitude Longitude Sediment Thickness to ' Project. Depth (feet) ! D-1 34.1728610 -77.9575450 12.0 D-2 34.1733430 -77.9573420 18.1 D-3 34.1739010 -77.9573780 5.80 D-4 34.1745970 I -77.957242' 7.30 D-5 34.1751490 -77.9572280 5.20 1.4 Standard of Care Terracon's services were performed in a the profession undertaken in similar stud period. Terracon makes no warrantie conclusions, or recommendations. Pie laboratories, regulatory agencies, or c preparation of the report. These dre accordance with the scope of work agi PES197346, dated October 24, 2019, al 2019. 1.5 Additional Scope Lim Findings, conclusions, and recommenc information derived from the on -site act work; such information is subject to ch those encountered at specific borings or or exploratory services. The data, interF solely upon data obtained at the time an 1.6 Reliance anner consistent with generally accepted practices of in the same geographical area during the same time either express or implied, regarding the findings, note that Terracon does not warrant the work of Dr third parties supplying information used in the le sediment analysis services were performed in d upon and as reflected in Terracon Proposal No. as outlined in the Client's Work Plan, dated October itions resulting from these services are based upon ties and other services performed under this scope of ige over time. Subsurface conditions may vary from uring other surveys, tests, assessments, investigations stations, findings, and our recommendations are based within the scope of these services. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of NGC and Urban Engineers, Inc. (the Client). Any authorization for use or reliance by any other party (except a governmental entity having jurisdiction over the site) is prohibited without the express written authorization of the Client and Terracon. Any unauthorized distributlion or reuse is at the Client's sole risk. Notwithstanding the foregoing, reliance by authorized parties will be subject to the terms, conditions, and Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 3 Tier II Sediment Sampling Report I 1 ��rraeon National Gypsum Company ■ Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina December 31, 2019 ■ Terracon Project No. ES197346 limitations stated in the proposal and the Consultant Agreement between Urban Engineers, Inc. and Terracon, dated November 7, 2019. 2.0 FIELD SAMPLING AND LABORATORY METHODS On November 8, 2019, Terracon and Athena Technologies, Inc. (Athena) mobilized and conducted the sediment sampling investigation at the NGC berth in the Cape Fear River. A total of five (5) sediment samples, D-1 through D-5, were collected from the existing mud line to -38 feet MLW for physical and analytical testing in accordance with the project's October 2019 Work Plan. Laboratory analyses were completed on the sediment samples as described in the October 2019 Work Plan. Field collection activities and analytical laboratory methods were conducted in general accordance with the USACE Sediment Testing Guidelines for Dredged Material Proposed for Disposal in Federal Project Disposal Area Is by Applicants, dated May 2009. 2.1 Sediment Sampling Sediment samples were collected in ge SESDPROC-200-R3, Sediment Samplin sediment cores using a vibracore sampl sediment for sample retrieval from the d Artemis. A handheld, sub -meter accurate (DGPS) unit interfaced with HYPACK was sediment sample stations. Once on sta immobilized using a triple point anchors) the sample station were checked against sample depths were determined by uti accurate to ± 2 centimeters (cm) interface era] accordance with EPA Operating Procedure No. (August 21, 2014). Terracon collected the marine ig system to push sediment sampling tubes into the !ck of the Athena Technologies' research vessel RN Trimble GeoX7 Differential Global Positioning System itilized to navigate the vessel to the desired pre -plotted on, the sample location was marked, and the vessel stem. With the vessel immobilized, the coordinates at he desired sample location. Sediment elevations and zing a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) ] with the North Carolina Real Time Network. The marine sediment cores were collected using a hydraulic vibracore system utilizing a 3-inch diameter, decontaminated, stainless -steel, sample barrel capable of collecting core samples up to 20-feet long. The sample barrel was advanced into the sediment at each location until the desired sample depth of -38 feet MLW was reached, unless refusal was encountered first. As discussed in Section 2.4, two (2) to three (3) cores were advanced at each sample location (with the exception of D-3) due to refusal and/or recovery issues. In most locations, desired penetration depths would be reached; however, recovery was limited due to the presence of wood and/or rock debris within the sediments. The sample barrel was decontaminated (see Section 2.2) between each sample location as necessary. Copies of the field notes recorded during the sediment sampling activities are provided in Appendix B. Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 4 Tier II Sediment Sampling Report 11'erracon National Gypsum Company ■ Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina December 31, 2019 ■ Terracon Project No. ES197346 Approximately five (5) gallons of sediment were collected from each of the sediment sampling locations to be used for physical and analytical analysis. The collected sediment from each sample location was placed into a decontaminated stainless -steel bowl and mixed thoroughly with a stainless -steel spoon until a relatively uniform composite was achieved. The appropriate laboratory -supplied sample jars were then filled and immediately placed on ice in an insulated cooler. 2.2 Equipment Decontamination During sample collection procedures and handling of sampling equipment, all personnel wore nitrile gloves in order to prevent sample contamination. Gloves were changed in between sediment sampling locations. Non -dedicated sampling equipment, such as the core barrel, was decontaminated before and after sample collection to avoid cross contamination using a series of washes and rinses designed to remove sediment residues that could interfere with analysis of the samples collected with that equipment or cause false positives to be reported by the contract laboratory. The decontamination area was set up separately from the sampling area on the vessel in order to isolate these activities. The following steps were followed to decontaminate equipment intended for collection of samples that were to be analyzed for both organic and inorganic contaminants: • Wash and scrub equipment with a non -phosphoric, laboratory grade detergent and water, • Rinse with tap water, • Rinse with distilled or deionized water, • Rinse with 10% nitric acid, • Rinse with distilled or deionized water, • Rinse with methanol, • Rinse with distilled or deionized water, • Allow to air dry in an area not adjacent to decontamination area, and • Wrap sampling equipment with aluminum foil after decontamination, to remain wrapped until next sample collection. Nitric acid and methanol rinse wastes were containerized in separate five (5) gallon buckets on - site. The buckets were then delivered to a local contract laboratory for proper handling and disposal as non -hazardous waste. Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 5 Tier II Sediment Sampling Report National Gypsum Company v Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina December 31, 2019 n Terracon Project No. ES197346 2.3 Sample Processing and Analysis 1rerracon Immediately upon collection and homogenization, the sediment samples to be analyzed by the laboratory were placed into pre -labeled,, pre -cleaned, airtight containers of the appropriate material as obtained from Pace Analytical Services, LLC (Pace) out of Huntersville, North Carolina. After sealing the containers, tamper -proof, field labeled seals were placed on each container. All sample containers were labeled accurately and filled out entirely with the following label information consistent with that provided on the chain of custody form: • Project • Sample ID • Sample Media • Date & time of collection • Name of collector • Sample preservation used • Type of analysis • Lab number Preservation steps were taken immedial sealed, all samples were containerized a dark at 4°C between collection and proc activities, all sediment samples were di properly packaged for shipment to Pace Table 2 below describes the laboratory as detailed in the October 2019 Work P Table 2: Laboratory Analyses and ly following the collection of the samples. After being d placed on ice in insulated coolers to be stored in the 3sing. Subsequent to completion of the field sampling ivered by hand to Terracon's Savannah Office to be i Huntersville, North Carolina. performed on the submitted sediment samples EPA Methods Performed a r` L borafojy 1:" Sample ; Laboratory -EPA Sample ID Matnx - Laboratory Analysis a� MetKdd:,l Project -Specific Volatiles SM 8260D D-1 Poly ----- ----------------------- -------------------------------- iuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) --------- --- -------- ----- ------ SM 8270E D_2 ------...-----...--------------------------------------- Project -Specific Metals -----------. SM 6010D D-3 Sediment -- Mercury SM 7471B D-4 -- - —--------- Oil and Grease ----------- -..-------------..--..----- SM 9071B D-5 0rganochIorinePesticides SW8468081B Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 6 Tier II Sediment Sampling Report National Gypsum Company a Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina December 31, 2019 ■ Terracon Project No. ES197346 lrerracon Laboratory 6ample.lD Sample,, Matrix . _ r f Laboratory Analysis °g Laboratory EPA. �_ Method.,= D-1 MADEP EPH MADEP EPH D_2 --------.---........... .......... ....... ..... ................._................ .._.------ .-...... MADEPVPH ... .......... .... ..... ................ -..-..... MADEPVPH D-3 Sediment ---...-...-----:...-...------------------ -_--...--------------------------------------- ----.....------------------- Total Organic Carbon (TOC) SM 9060A D-4 --._- --------------- .-----------------.....----- --- ..---- -..........-------- ....---.---- .....-------------------------------- _........ D-5 Percent Moisture ASTM D2974-87 Sediment for physical testing was placed into a sealed container and delivered by hand to Terracon's Savannah Office soils lab. Physical analysis included: • Particle -Size Analysis by ASTM D 22 • Water Content by ASTM D2216-10 • Specific Gravity of Soils by ASTM D854-00 2.4 Deviations and Difficulties Enlcountered As briefly discussed in Section 2.1, refusal and core recovery were an issue at most all of the sediment sample locations. Two (2) to three (3) attempts were made at each location (except D-3) to reach the project depth and/or recover adequate sediment volumes for analysis. Table 3 below details the attempts and recoveries at each I location. Table 3: Sediment Core Recoveries and Notes @' "- Sample ID - Attempt:,J PerSetratron -.- Recovery _ ,., (feet);; 1 9.0 Discarded sample. D-1 12.0 2 0.5 Discarded sample. 3* 9.1* Retained third core. Wood debris in bottom of core. 1 12.2 Discarded sample. D-2 18.2 2* 9 7* More wood in bottom than Attempt #1. Kept and ultimately used for sample. 3 9.25 Retained second sample material. D-3 1* 5.6 4.9* Retained for sample. 1 5.1 Encountered refusal. D-4 8.0 Full core recovered. Discarded extra 8" 2* 8 0* past -38 feet MLW and retained sample. Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 7 Tier II Sediment Sampling Report National Gypsum Company ■ Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina December 31, 2019 ■ Terracon Project No. ES197346 lrerracon ` I Sample ID Attempt Penetration Recovery Notes (feet) (feet)_ 1 0.0 No recovery due to heavy wood and rock/concrete debris. 2 2.0 Core barrel clogged with wood and D-5 5.3 rock/concrete debris. 3 2.0 Core barrel clogged with wood and rock/concrete debris. 4` 4 8' Approximately 1-foot of wood debris in top of the core barrel. Retained sample. Sample core retained for physical and chemical analysis No other deviations or difficulties were 3.0 LABORATORY TEST 3.1 Sediment Physical rienced during the field collection activities. LTS AND DISCUSSION The marine sediments evaluated in this study range from approximately 4.8 to 9.7-feet thick and were collected to a depth of approximately -38 feet MLW. As proposed, physical analyses including particle -size analysis, water content, and specific gravity of soils were conducted on the individual sediment samples at Terracon'sl, Savannah Office soils lab. The laboratory particle size distribution results indicate the sample is classified generally as a dark gray sandy silt. Breakdowns of the sand/silt/clay fractions are provided in Table 4 below. Table 4: Sediment Sand/Silt/Clay Sample'" %'Gravel, - �; •%`Sand, %',Fines-, .. ID Coarse "°' ',Fine Coar;e jv - Medium 'Fine Silt Clay' D-1 0.0 0.0 0.0 I 2.9 2.7 94.4 D-2 0.0 0.0 0.01 4.4 5.5 90.1 D-3 0.0 0.0 0.01 2.4 8.7 88.9 D-4 0.0 0.0 0.01 3.0 14.0 83.0 D-5 0.0 0.0 0.01 23.7 22.2 54.1 Specific gravities for the samples at 20°C ranged from 2.464 (D-2) to 2.618 (D-4). Water contents ranged from 164.4% (D-4) to 246.4% (D-3). Copies of the particle size, water content, and specific gravity lab reports are provided in Appendix C. Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 8 Tier II Sediment Sampling Report National Gypsum Company ■ Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina December 31, 2019 ■ Terracon Project No. ES197346 3.2 Sediment Chemical Characteristics lrerracon All sediment samples were submitted to Pace in Huntersville, North Carolina for chemical analysis. The sediment sample results are summarized in attached Table 5. Only analytes with detections above the laboratory reporting limits (RL) are displayed. The sediment laboratory analytical report is provided in Appendix D including EPA method numbers, detection limits, and references. As shown in Table 5, the sediment sample results were compared to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Region 4 Waste Management Division Sediment Screening Values for Hazardous Waste Sites (referred to' as ESVs), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Effects Range Low (ERL) and the Effects Range Median (ERM) toxic effect threshold concentrations, as well as the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) Industrial/Commercial Health Based Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) and the Protection of Groundwater PSRGs, as specified in the October 2019 Work Plan. It is important to note that the NOAA El regulatory standards, toxicity thresholds, for dredged material disposal decisions. T guidelines to interpret chemical data from are concentrations below which adverse e occur. ERM values are concentrations at in sediment frequently occur. Chemical c reasonably expected to have no adverse values are considered better indicators of than ERLs. and ERM values are not intended to be used as 3nup or remediation targets, or as pass -fail criteria are intended to be used as non -regulatory, informal Jiment analysis. As defined by NOAA, ERL values :ts of chemicals on organisms in the sediment rarely 3 which adverse effects of chemicals on organisms centrations between the ERL and ERM values are ects on organisms in the sediment. Overall, ERM probability of potential adverse effects of chemicals Select metals, the VOC acetone, and TOG were the only constituents detected above laboratory RLs. Those constituents detected above the laboratory RLs primarily indicated the presence of constituents below all of the regulatory standards and screening levels compared to. The following constituents were detected in at least one (1) sediment sample at, or above, at least one (1) of the applicable regulatory limits/screning levels: Arsenic was detected in all of the isediment samples at concentrations ranging from 8.9 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) to 16.9 mg/kg. These detections exceed all of the regulatory standards and screening levels used, with the exception of the NOAA ERM. Cobalt was detected in all of the mg/kg to 9.2 mg/kg. These concel PSRG of 0.90 mg/kg but are less PSRG of 70 mg/kg. There is no E Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable iiment samples at concentrations ranging from 5.4 tions exceed the NCDEQ Protection of Groundwater in the NCDEQ Industrial/Commercial Health Based ERL, or ERM established for cobalt. 11 Tier II Sediment Sampling Report 1 ��rracon National Gypsum Company ■ Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina December 31, 2019 a Terracon Project No. ES197346 Mercury was detected in samples D-2 (0.19 mg/kg) and D-4 (0.14 mg/kg) in excess of the USEPA ESV of 0.13 mg/kg. The detection in D-2 also exceeds the NOAA ERL of 0.15 mg/kg. Sample material from D-1 was analyzed in triplicate for metals per the October 2019 Work Plan. The D-1 Triplicate sample result for mercury was equal to the ESV of 0.13 mg/kg; however, D-1 and D-1 Duplicate contained mercury less than the ESV and all other standards. 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Terracon conducted Tier II dredge sediment sampling and analysis for the NGC berth located on the Cape Fear River in Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina. Sampling was conducted in general accordance with the USACE Sediment Testing Guidelines for Dredged Material Proposed for Disposal in Federal Project Disposal Areas by Applicants, dated May 2009, and the Client -provided October 2019 Work Plan for the project. Laboratory analytical testing on the sediment samples was performed by Pace in Huntersville, North Carolina. Physical analyses were performed on the sediment samples in Terracon's Savannah Office soils lab. The results of the analytical testing on the sediment samples indicated arsenic was detected above the applicable USEPA ESV, NOAA ERL, NCDEQ Industrial/Commercial Health Based PSRG, and the NCDEQ Protection of Groundwater PSRG in all five (5) locations. Cobalt exceeded the NCDEQ Protection of Groundwater PSRG in all five (5) locations. Lastly, mercury met or exceeded the USEPA ESV (three [3] samples) and occasionally the NOAA ERL (one [1] sample). The NOAA ERM values were not exceeded in any of the sediment samples, where established. As mentioned previously, chemical cor reasonably expected to have no adverse are generally considered better indicat chemicals than ERLs. drations between the ERL and ERM values are ;cts on organisms in the sediment and ERM values of the probability of potential adverse effects of Note that due to the metal concentrations detected in the sediments, the USACE may require additional site sampling to include elutriatelanalysis to determine the potential impact of the metals in sediments on the water column during dredging activities should the USACE-owned Eagle Island CDF be chosen as the disposal location. I Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 10 ABLES n� Ja W117►:W_1 Figures DreorrFTree -Poln� v Sfirf .y 1i f —»r F � EXPLANATION Pro7ecl Manager. Note: UtM Base map was taken from a portion of the 2019 pawn by: tRM W hnington, North Carolina U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute series topographic quadrangle map. Contour eneckeeby: SAn interval is 5 feet. Approveeby: seD .1e tttt uppity, Ifrunt Range ON try re LS_af \ t..,A S 9 O � pptNaATE RD O u P pQ- ti BWANRO t' II 1 Y1�NDfNIMFOq Gqe� r� '/// "'� Pro7edl No. ES117346 1r�rr�con Consulting Engineers&Scientists TOPOGRAPHIC MAP Figure: Scale: NONE National Gypsum Company File Name: E51s7sos Al. Savaman,Genga 31461 8388unnyvale Drive Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina Date: DecenWer 70, 2019 PWne(912) PMe(512162S 4000 F.(912)(291001 v s- EXPLANATION 0 Sediment Sample Location Nag Map elements were graphically estimated been GCogle Earth aerial Imagery and onsge observations. e •• URM ES Drawn by: LAM acale:'•.- NONE lrerracon Consulting Engineers&Scientists Checkedby: Fit Name: I SAD ES197346 2201 RaMad A. a.,..^ c .* 31461 Appray.dby: Dale: Pbmer9121629A000 F. r9121 M 4001 SAD Derember 10. 2m9 SAMPLE LOCATION MAP National Gypsum Company 838 Sunnyvale Drive Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina AUN PENDIX B Field Sampling Documentation Notes TABLE 1 - HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL DATA CONVERSION SUMMARY TERRACON CONSULTANTS, INC. NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA NOVEMBER 2019 Station ID Data Conversion Input Parameters 111 East North Elevation (x) (y) (ft NAVD 88) Data Conversion Output Parameters 121 Elevation Latitude Longitude (ft MLW) D-1 2315335.03 155560.86 0.43 34.172861 -77.957545 2.71 D-2 2315394.84 155736.92 -0.04 34.173343 -77.957342 2.24 D-3 2315381.77 155939.69 -0.37 34.173901 -77.957378 1.91 D-4 2315420.10 156193.60 -0.87 34.174697 -77.957242 1.41 D-5 2315422.42 156394.53 -1.54 34-.175T49— ---- - -77.957228 - —T ----0.74- - - - - 111= Horizontal coordinates were recorded in the field and were referenced to North American Datum of 1983, State Plane Coordinate System, North Carolina (Zone 3200). US Survey Feel. '21= Coordinate and elevation conversion performed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Vertical Datum Transformation (VDatum) software, Version 3.6.1. Notes ft NAVD 88 = Feel relative to North American Vertical Datum of 1988 ft MLW = Feet relative to Mean Low Water Local elevation datum for the project area can be obtained from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration fide station: Wilmington, NC (Station ID: 8658120). 40# ATHEIyA TECHNOLOGIES. INC. Page 1 of 1 1293 Graham Farts Road, PO Box 68 McClellanvile, South Carolina 29458 (843)887-3800 www.athenatechnologies.com TABLE 2 - VIBRACORE SUMMARY TERRACON CONSULTANTS, INC. NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA NOVEMBER 2019 Tide Sediment Bottom of Stolen ID Collection Time East ill North inWater Depth R1 Surface Boring Penetration Recovery Notes Date (X) (Y) (ft) Elevation Elevation Elevation (ft) (ft) (ft MLW) (H MLW) (it MLW) D-1 11/8/2019 9:08 2315335.03 155560.86 28.7 2.7 -26.0 -38.0 12.0 9.1 Moved -15 feet to avoid dock; made 3 coring attempts; D-2 11/8/2019 10:30 2315394.84 155736.92 22.1 2.2 -19.9 -38.1 18.2 9.7 wood observed at base of sample barrel during first and ' second attempts; retained second core. D-3 11/8/2019 11:30 2315381.77 165939.69 34.1 1.9 -32.2 -37.8 5.6 4.9 D4 11/8/2019 8.0 8.0 Made 2 cdnng attempts; retained second core for - 12:05 2315420.10 156193.60 32.1 1.4 -30.7 -38.7 processing. D-5 11/8/2019 13:20 2315422.42 156394.53 33.5 0.7 -32.8 -38.0 5.3 4.8 Made 3 coring attempts; retamed third core for processing. nl = Horizontal coordinates were recorded in North American Datum of 1983, State Plane Coordinate System, North Carolina (Zone 320). US Survey Feet. Rl = Vertical elevation data were collected in the field and were referenced to North Amedcan Vertical Datum of 1988, US Survey Feet. Bevation date were subsequently converted to Mean Low Water via the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrations (NOAA) Vertical Datum Transformation (VDalum) software, Version 3.6.1. See Table 1 for elevation conversion details. Notes ft=feet MLW = Mean Low Water bss = below sediment surface Aw"ENA TECHNOLOGIES. INC. Page 1 of 1 1293 Graham Farm Road, PO Box 68 McClellanville, South Carolina 29458 (843)887-3800 www.athenatechnologies.com PENDIX C Sediment Physical Laboratory Reports loc 9( 8C 7C w W Z 6C LL Z 5C W w 4C W n. 3C zC 1C r Particle Si em Distribution Report O Q O O O N 1 %+3" Coarse Fim 0.0 0.0 0.0 TEST RESULTS Opening Percent Spec.' Pass? Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fall) 3/4" 100.0 1/2" 100.0 3/8" 100.0 #4 100.0 #10 100.0 #20 100.0 #40 97.1 #60 96.9 #100 96.4 #200 94.4 (no specification provided) Location: D-1 Samnla Numhar• W nanth• _ 0.1 0.01 0.001 %Fines 2_9 Material Description Dark Gray Fine -Medium Sandy SILT Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318) PL= - LL= - Pl= - Classification USCS (D 2487)= MH AASHTO (M 145)= Coefficients DSO= D85= D60= D50= D30= D15= D70= Cu= Cc= Remarks Natural Moisture 211.9% Date Received: 11/8/19 Date Tested: 11/21/19 Tested By: BLH Checked By: BLH Title: Soil Lab Manager Date Sampled: 11/8/19 Client: National Gypsum Company Irerracproject: National Gypsum Tier II Project No: ES197346 Figure lac 9C 8C 7C W Z 6G Z 5C W 2 4C W 0- 3C 20 1C C Particle Size Distribution Report ... 0 a n V a e n 'II■■IIIIIII■■IIII-11�■r�li1.IN1111■■Illfll■ 11■■IIIIIII■■IIIIIII■■IIIIIII■■IIIIIII■■IIIIIII■� 11■■IIIIIII■■IIIIIII■■IIIIIII■■IIIIIII■■IIIIIII■� 11■■IIIIIII■■IIIIIII■■IIIIIII■■IIIIIII■■IIIIIII■ 11■■IIIIIII■■IIIIIII■■IIIIIII■■IIIIIII■■IIIIIII■■ 11■■Illlfll■■IIIIIII■■IIIIIII■■IIIIIII■■IIIIIII■■ 11■■Illlfll■■IIIIIII■■IIIIIII■■IIIIIII■■IIIIIII■■ 11■■Illlfll■■II11111■ullll■■IIII■1■■II1111■■ 1Un 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 r PAIN R17F - mm a/ +3„ % Gravel % Sand % Fines Coarse Fine ca rse Medium Fine Silt Clay 0.0 0.0 0.0 d.o 4.4 5.5 90.1 TEST RESULTS Opening Percent Spec.' Pass? Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fall) 3/4" 100.0 1/2" 100.0 3/8" 100.0 #4 100.0 #10 100.0 #20 100.0 #40 95.6 #60 94.2 #100 93.0 #200 90.1 (no specification provided) Location: D-2 Camnla Mimhor• 11,) rlon}h• - Material Description Dark Gray Medium -Fine Sandy SILT Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318) PL= - LL= - PI= - Classification USCS (D 2487)= MH AASHTO (M 145)= - Coefficients D90= D85= D60= D50= D30= D15' D10= Cu' Cc= Remarks Natural Moisture 179.4% Date Received: 11/8/19 Date Tested: 11/21/19 Tested By: BLH Checked By: BLH Title: Soil Lab Manager Date Sampled: I1/8/19 Client: National Gypsum Company ifierracon Project: National Gypsum Tier II Project No: ES197346 Figure Particle S „lismillillim :u�®uuu Distribution Report V f{MI I V JILC - 111111. %+31. °/ Gravel % Sand % Fines ) Coarse Fine Coarse Medium I Fl I Silt I Clav TEST RESULTS Opening Percent Spec Pass? Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fall) 3/411 100.0 1/211 100.0 3/811 100.0 #4 100.0 #10 100.0 #20 100.0 #40 97.6 #60 96.4 #100 95.1 #200 88.9 (no specification provided) Location: D-3 Sarrnle Numher. D-3 Denth- - Material Description Dark Gray Fine Sandy SILT Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318) PL= - LL= - PI= - Classiflcation USCS (D 2487)= MH AASHTO (M 145)= - Coefficients D90= 0.0827 D85= D60= D50= D30= D15= D10= Cu= cc - Remarks Natural Moisture 192.1% Date Received: 11/8/19 Date Tested: 11/21/19 Tested By: BLH Checked By: BLH Title: Soil Lab Manager Date Sampled: 11/8/19 Client: National Gypsum Company Irferraconl Project: National Gypsum Tier Il Project No: ES197346 Figure 100 90 80 70 W Z 60 Z 50 W � 40 W a- 30 20 10 0 Particle Size Distribution Report 5 'i F 0 0 0 0 0 e 9 HIM111111101111119M 001111110=1111111M 1uu lu 1 U.1 d C17F - mm e.el u.u01 I %+3" '. , Coarse Fine C arse Medium Fine Silt Clay 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 3.0 1 14.0 83.0 TEST RESULTS Opening Percent Spec. Pass? Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail) 3/4" 100.0 1/2" 100.0 3/8" 100.0 #4 100.0 #10 100.0 #20 100.0 #40 97.0 #60 93.1 #100 90.9 #200 83.0 (no specification provided) Location: D-4 Rmmriln Mnmhor• n-4 nonfh- - Material Description Dark Gray Medium -Fine Sandy SILT Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318) PL= - LL= - P1= - Classification USCS (D 2487)= MH AASHTO (M 145)= - Coefficients Dgo= 0.1341 D88= 0.0870 D60= D50= D30= D15= D10= Cu= Cc= Remarks Natural Moisture 164.4% Date Received: I1/8/19 Date Tested: 11/21/19 Tested By: BLH Checked By: BLH Title: Soil Lab Manager Date Sampled: 11/8/19 1rerrac:o:n Client: National Gypsum Company Project: National Gypsum Tier II Project No: ES197346 Figure % Gravel %Sand %Fines %+3" Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Silt I Clay 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 .0 23.7 1 22.2 54.1 TEST RESULTS Opening Percent Spec.' Pass? Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fall) 3/4" 100.0 1/2" 100.0 3/9" 100.0 #4 100.0 #10 100.0 420 92.6 #40 76.3 #60 60.7 #100 56.8 #200 54.1 (no specification provided) Location: D-5 Rmmnla Nnmhar• Mi n.a fh• _ Material Description Dark Gray Fine -Medium Sandy SILT with Wood Debris Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318) PL= - LL= - PI= - Classification USCS (D 2487)= MH AASHTO (M 145)= - Coefficients D90= 0.7329 DSS= 0.5813 D60= 0.2405 D50= D30= D15= D10= Cu= Cc= Remarks Natural Moisture 165.8% Date Received: 11/8/19 Date Tested: 11/21/19 Tested By: BLH Checked By: BLH Title: Soil Lab Manager Date Sampled: 11/8/19 Client: National Gypsum Company Irerracon Iroject: National Gypsum Tier II Project No: ES197346 Ficiure SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF SOIL SOLIDS National Gypsum Tire II ES197346 11/18/2019 Irerracon Sample # Material Type Pycnometer Dry Weight Pycnometer Volume Pycnometer + HZO Pycnometer+ H=O &Soil WOTemp P Mass Oven Dried Soil Specific Gravity @ 20° C D-1 Dark Gray Sandy SILT 151.26 500ml 649.29 675.77 63.3° F 42.80 2.624 D-1 Dark Gray Sandy SILT 153.94 500ml 651.62 680.50 63.3° F 46.80 2.613 D-1 Dark Gray Sandy SILT 166.83 500ml 664.51 693.92 63.3° F 47.80 2.600 D-2 Dark Gray Sandy SILT 172.35 500ml 670.39 702.88 63.3° F 54.70 2.464 D-3 Dark Gray Sandy SILT 156.07 500ml 654.10 685.65 63.3° F 51.80 2.559 D-4 Dark Gray Sandy SILT 151.41 500mi 649.22 680.61 63.30 F 50.80 2.618 D-5 Dark Gray Sandy SILT 151.26 500m1 649.29 679.54 63.3° F 49.70 --2.556 *Testing performed in general accordance with ASTM D854. Performed By: Bart Hill APPENDIX D Sediment Analytical Laboratory Reports aceAnalytical w ,Pacelabssam November 20, 2019 Leah Moore Terracon 2201 Rowland Ave Savannah, GA 31404 RE: Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 Dear Leah Moore: Enclosed are the analytical results for sampl The results relate only to the samples includ, most current, applicable TNI/NELAC standai where applicable, unless otherwise noted in If you have any questions concerning this Since-11�rel/y, p : Taylor Ezell taylor.ezell@pacelabs.com (704)875-9092 Project Manager Enclosures Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Hunlersviile, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 s) received by the laboratory on November 12, 2019. in this report. Results reported herein conform to the s and the laboratory's Quality Assurance Manual, e body of the report. please feel free to contact me. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, U.C. Page 1 of 52 aceAnalytical e 1VWVr.pacalaba.tala Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 Pace Analytical Services Charlotte 9800 Kincey Ave. Ste 100, Huntersville, NC 28078 Louisiana/NELAP Certification # LA170028 North Carolina Drinking Water Certification #: 37706 North Carolina Field Services Certification #: 5342 North Carolina Wastewater Certification #: 12 Pace Analytical Services Asheville 2225 Riverside Drive, Asheville, NC 28804 Florida/NELAP Certification #: E87648 Massachusetts Certification #: M-NC030 North Carolina Drinking Water Certification #: 37712 Cy:l:4111A[N_N11101kill South Carolina Certification #: 99006001 Florida/NELAP Certification #: E87627 Kentucky UST Certification #: 84 VrginiaA/ELAP Certification #: 460221 North Carolina Wastewater Certification #: 40 South Carolina Certification #: 99030001 Vrginia/VELAP Certification #: 460222 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, I.I.C. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 Page 2 of 52 aceAnalj/tical ® mww.pecelabs.cam Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 I SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT i Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 Analytes Lab ID Sample ID Method Analysts Reported Laboratory 92453338001 D-1 EPA 8081B SEM 24 PASI-C ! 9071B I JMS1 1 PASI-C MADEP EPH BAJ 7 PASI-C MADEP VPH LMB 6 PASI-C EPA6010D KQ 15 PASI-A EPA7471B SOO 1 PASI-A EPA 8270E BPJ 21 PASI-C EPA 8260D SAS 48 PASI-C ASTM D2974-87 KDF 1 PASI-C EPA 9060A MJP 5 PASI-A 92453338002 D-2 EPA8081B SEM 24 PASI-C 9071B JMS1 1 PASI-C MADEP EPH BAJ 7 PASI-C MADEP VPH LMB 6 PASI-C _ EPA6010D KQ 15 PASI-A EPA7471B SOO 1 PASI-A EPA 8270E BPJ 21 PASI-C EPA 8260D SAS 48 PASI-C ASTM D2974-87 KDF 1 PASI-C EPA 9060A MJP 5 PASI-A 92453338003 D-3 EPA 8081B SEM 24 PASI-C 9071E JMS1 1 PASI-C MADEP EPH BAJ 7 PASI-C MADEP VPH LMB 6 PASI-C EPA 601 OD KQ 15 PASI-A EPA7471B SOO 1 PASI-A EPA 8270E BPJ 21 PASI-C EPA 8260D SAS 48 PASI-C ASTM D2974-87 KOF 1 PASI-C EPA 9060A MJP 5 PASI-A 92453338004 D-4 EPA 8081B SEM 24 PASI-C 9071B JMS1 1 PASI-C MADEP EPH BAJ 7 PASI-C MADEP VPH LMB 6 PASI-C EPA 6010D KQ 15 PASI-A EPA 7471B SOO 1 PASI-A EPA 8270E BPJ 21 PASI-C REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the wri0en consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Page 3 of 52 aceAnalytical e w .Pacelaba.com SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 Analytes Lab ID Sample ID Method Analysts Reported Laboratory EPA 8260D SAS 48 PASI-C ASTM D2974-87 KDF 1 PASI-C EPA 9060A MJP 5 PASI-A 92453338005 D-5 EPA8081B SEM 24 PASI-C 9071E JMS1 1 PASI-C i MADEP EPH BAJ 7 PASI-C MADEP VPH LMB 6 PASI-C EPA 601 OD KQ 15 PASI-A EPA 7471B SOO 1 PASI-A EPA8270E BPJ 21 PASI-C EPA 8260D SAS 48 PASI-C ASTM D2974-87 KDF 1 PASI-C EPA9060A MJP 5 PASI-A 92453338007 D-1 Duplicate EPA6010D KQ 15 PASI-A _ EPA74718 S00 1 PASI-A ASTM D2974-87 KDF 1 PASI-C - EPA 9060A MJP 5 PASI-A 92453338008 D-1 Triplicate EPA6010D KQ 15 PASI-A EPA 7471B SOO 1 PASI-A ASTM D2974-87 KDF 1 PASI-C EPA9060A MJP 5 PASI-A REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Page 4 of 52 aceAnalj6cal e www.pacelabmcm Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 ANALYTICAL RESULTS I Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 Sample: D-1 Lab ID: 92453338001 Collected: 11/08/19 10:15 Received: 11/12/1910:45 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Oual 8081 GCS Pesticides Aldrin alpha-BHC beta-BHC delta-BHC gamma-BHC (Undane) Chlordane (Technical) 4,4'-DDD 4,4'-DDE 4,4'-DDT Dieldrin Endosulfan I Endosulfan II Endosulfan sulfate Endrin Endrin aldehyde Endrin ketone Heptachlor :ptachlor epoxide fexachlorobenzene melhoxychlor Mirex Toxaphene Surrogates Tetrachloro-m-xylene (S) Decachlorobiphenyl (S) 9071 Oil and Grease Oil and Grease MADEP EPH NC Soil Aliphatic (C09-C18) Aliphatic (C19-C36) Aromatic (C11-C22) Surrogates Nonatriacontane (S) o-Terphenyl (S) 2-Fluorobiphenyl(S) 2-Bromonaphthalene (S) VPH NC Soil Aliphatic(C05-CO8) Aliphatic(C09-C12) Aliphatic(C09-Cl2) Adjusted Aromatic (C09-C10) Surrogates 4-Bromofluorobenzene (FID)(S) Analytical Method: EPA 80818 Preparation Method: EPA 3546 NO ug/kg 12.3 2 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 10:09 309-00-2 M1 NO ug/kg 12.3 2 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 10:09 319-84-6 NO ug/kg 12.3 2 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 10:09 319-85-7 M1 NO ug/kg 12.3 2 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 10:09 319-86-8 NO ug/kg 12.3 2 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 10:09 58-89-9 NO ug/k9 43.2 2 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 10:09 57-74-9 NO ug/kg 12.3 2 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 10:09 72-54-8 NO ug/kg 12.3 2 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 10:09 72-55-9 NO ug/kg 12.3 2 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 10:09 50-29-3 NO ug/kg 12.3 2 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 10:09 60-57-1 NO ug/kg 12.3 2 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 10:09 959-98-8 Mt NO ug/k9 12.3 2 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 10:09 33213-65-9 NO ug/k9 12.3 2 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 10:09 1031-07-8 NO ug/kg 12.3 2 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 10:09 72-20-8 NO ug/kg 12.3 2 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 10:09 7421-93-4 NO ug/kg 12.3 2 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 10:09 53494-70-5 NO ug/kg 12.3 2 11/18/19 14:08 11/1911910:09 76-44-8 Mt NO ug/kg 12.3 2 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 10:09 1024-57-3 Mt NO ug/kg 12.3 2 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 10:09 118-74-1 NO ug/kg 30.9 2 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 10:09 72-43-5 NO ug/kg 30.9 2 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 10:09 2385-85-5 NO ug/kg 43.2 2 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 10:09 8001-35-2 87 % 15-130 2 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 10:09 877-09-8 D3 82 % 10-130 2 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 10:09 2051-24-3 Analytical Method: 9071E Preparation Method: 9071B NO mg/kg 217 1 11/18/1910:20 11/18/1910:33 N2 Analytical Method: MADEP EPH Preparation Method: MADEP EPH NO mg/kg 30.6 1 11/16/1916:18 11/19/19 08:04 M1,N2 NO mg/kg 30.6 1 11/16/1916:18 11/19/19 08:04 N2 NO mg/kg 30.6 1 11/16/1916:18 11/19/19 08:04 N2 76 % 40-140 1 11/16/19 16:18 11/19/19 08:04 7194-86-7 77 % 40-140 1 11116/19 16:18 11/19/19 08:04 84-15-1 96 % 40-140 1 11/16/19 16:18 11/19/19 08:04 321-60-8 41 % 40-140 1 11/16/19 16:18 11/19/19 08:04 580-13-2 Analytical Method: MADEP VPH Preparation Method: MADEP VPH NO mg/k9 15.2 1 11/13/1918:06 11/13/1918:54 N2 NO mg/kg 15.2 1 11/13/1918:06 11/13/1918:54 N2 NO mg/kg 15.2 1 11/13/1918:06 11/13/1918:54 N2 NO mg/kg' 15.2 1 11/13/1918:06 11/13/1918:54 N2 92 % 70-130 1 11/13/1918:06 11/13/19 18:54 460-00-4 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This reportshall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Page 5 of 52 aceAna]XIcal e avuv.pacehbsxom ANALYTICAL RESULTS I Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 Sample: D-1 Lab ID: 92453338001 1 Collected: 11/08/1910:15 Received: 11/12/19 10:45 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units ' Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual VPH NC Soil Analytical Method: MADEP VPH Preparation Method: MADEP VPH Surrogates 4-Bromofluorobenzene (PID) (S) 91 % 70-130 1 11113119 18:06 11/13/19 18:54 460-004 6010 MET ICP Analytical Method: EPA 6010D Preparation Method: EPA 3050E Antimony ND mg/kg 1.4 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:11 7440-36-0 Mt Arsenic 15.4 mg/kg 2.8 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:11 7440-38-2 Barium 33.9 mg/kg 1.4 1 11/15/19 11:27 11117/19 22:11 7440-39-3 Beryllium 1.2 mg/kg 0.28 1 11115/1911:27 11117/1922:11 7440-41-7 Cadmium 0.35 mg/kg 0.28 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:11 7440-43-9 Chromium 40.8 mg/kg 1.4 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:11 7440-47-3 Cobalt 9.2 mg/kg 1.4 1 11115/1911:27 11/17/19 22:11 7440-48-4 Copper 16.4 mg/kg 1.4 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:11 7440-50-8 Lead 20.2 mg/kg 1.4 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:11 7439-92-1 Nickel 12.9 mg/kg 1.4 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:11 7440-02-0 Selenium ND mg/kg 2.8 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:11 7782-49-2 Silver ND mg/kg 1.4 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/1711922:11 7440-22-4 - Thallium ND mg/kg 2.8 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:11 7440-28-0 madium 61.8 mg/kg 1.4 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:11 7440-62-2 nc 84.5 mg/kg 2.8 1 11115/1911:27 11/17/19 22:11 7440-66-6 7471 Mercury Analytical Method: EPA 74718 Preparation Method: EPA 7471B Mercury 8270E MSSV PAH Microwave Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzo(a)anthracene Benzo(a)pyrene Benzo(b)0uoranthene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Benzo(k)Buoranlhene Chrysene Dibenz(a,h)anthracene Fluoranlhene Fluorene Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1-Methylnaphthalene 2-Methylnaphthalene Naphthalene Phenanthrene Pyrene Surrogates Nitrobenzene-d5 (S) 2-Fluorobiphenyl(S) Terphenyl-d14 (S) Date: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM 0.090 mg/kg 0.0091 1 11/15/19 10:48 11/19/19 14:19 7439-97-6 M1 Analytical Method: EPA 8270E Preparation Method: EPA 3546 ND ug/kg 1010 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 18:20 83-32-9 ND ug/kg 1010 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 18:20 208-96-8 ND ug/kg 1010 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 18:20 120-12-7 ND ug/kg 1010 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 18:20 56-55-3 ND ug/kg 1010 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 18:20 50-32-8 ND ug/kg 1010 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 18:20 205-99-2 ND ug/kg 1010 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 18:20 191-24-2 ND ug/kg 1010 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 18:20 207-08-9 ND ug/kg 1010 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 18:20 218-01-9 ND uglkg 1010 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 18:20 53-70-3 ND ug/kg 1010 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 18:20 20644-0 ND ug/kg 1010 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18119 18:20 86-73-7 ND ug/kg 1010 1 11/18119 12:15 11/18119 18:20 193-39-5 ND ug/kg 1010 1 11118119 12:15 11/18/19 18:20 90-12-0 ND ug/kg 1010 1 11118/19 12:15 11/18/19 18:20 91-57-6 ND ug/kg 1010 1 11118119 12:15 11/18/19 18:20 91-20-3 ND ug/kg 1010 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 18:20 85-01-8 ND ug/kg 1010 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 18:20 129-00-0 53 % 23-110 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 18:20 4165-60-0 32 % 30-110 1 11118/19 12:15 11/18/19 18:20 321-60-8 39 % 28-110 1 11/18/19 12:16 11/18/19 18:20 1718-51-0 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, I.I.C. Page 6 of 52 mAnalytkal e w .pscellbsxom ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 Sample: D-1 Lab ID: 92453338001 Collected: 11/08/19 10:15 Received: 11112119 10:45 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. I Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 8260DIS035A Volatile Organics Analytical Method: EPA 8260D Preparation Method: EPA 5035A Acetone NO ug/kg 10400 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 67-64-1 Acrylonilrile NO ug/kg 10400 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 107-13-1 Benzene NO ug/kg 522 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 71-43-2 Bromochloromethane NO ug/kg 522 25 11/14/19 15:40 11114/1918:00 74-97-5 Bromodichloromethane NO ug/kg 522 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 75-27-4 Bromoform NO ug/kg 522 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 75-25-2 Bromomelhane NO ug/kg 1040 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 74-83-9 2-Butanone (MEK) NO ug/kg 10400 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 78-93-3 Carbon disulfide NO ug/kg 1040 25 11/14/19 16:40 11/14/19 18:00 75-15-0 Carbon tetrachloride ND ug/kg 522 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 56-23-5 Chlorobenzene NO ug/kg 522 25 11/14119 15:40 11114/1918:00 108-90-7 Chloroethane ND ug/kg 1040 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 75-00-3 Chloroform NO ug/kg 522 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 67-66-3 Chloromethane ND ug/kg 1040 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 74-87-3 Dibromochloromelhane NO ug/kg 522 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 124A8-1 Dibromomelhane ND ug/kg 522 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 74-95-3 1.2-Dichlorobenzene NO ug/kg 522 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 95-50-1 4-Dichlorobenzene NO ug/kg 522 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 106-46-7 :.ms-1,4-Dichlom-2-butene NO ug/kg 522 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 110-57-6 1,1-Dichloroethane NO ug/kg 522 25 11/14/19 16:40 11/14/19 18:00 75-34-3 1,2-Dichloroethane NO ug/kg 522 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 107-06-2 1,1-Dichloroethene NO ug/kg 522 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 75-35-4 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene NO ug/kg 522 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 156-59-2 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene NO ug/kg 522 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 156-60-5 1,2-Dichloropropane NO ug/kg 522 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 78-87-5 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene NO ug/kg 522 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 10061-01-5 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene NO ug/kg 522 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 10061-02-6 Ethylbenzene NO ug/kg 522 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 100-41-4 2-Hexanone NO ug/kg 5220 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 591-78-6 lodomelhane NO ug/kg 1040 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 74-88-4 M1 Methylene Chloride NO ug/kg 2090 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 75-09-2 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) NO ug/kg 5220 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 108-10-1 Styrene NO ug/kg 522 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 100-42-5 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane NO ug/kg 522 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 630-20-6 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/kg 522 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 79-34-5 Tetrachloroelhene NO ug/kg 522 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 127-18-4 Toluene NO ug/kg 522 25 11/14119 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 108-88-3 1,1,1-Trichloroelhane ND ug/kg 522 25 11/14119 15:40 11/14119 18:00 71-55-6 1,1,2-Trichloroelhane ND ug/kg 522 25 11/14119 15:40 11/14119 18:00 79-00-5 Trichloroethene NO ug/kg 522 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14119 18:00 79-01-6 Trichlorofiuoromethane NO ug/kg 522 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 75-69-4 1,2,3-Trichloropropane NO ug/kg 522 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 96-18-4 Vinyl acetate ND ug/kg 5220 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 108-05-4 Vinyl chloride ND ug/kg 1040 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 75-01-4 Xylene (Total) ND ug/kg 1040 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 1330-20-7 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, I.I.C. Page 7 of 52 aceAnaiXical e 1 .pacelftcom ANALYTICAL RESULTS I Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 Sample: D-1 Lab ID: 92453338001 Collected: 11/08/19 10:15 Received: 11/12/19 10:45 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units) Report Limit OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 8260DIS035A Volatile Organics Analytical Method: EPA 8260D Preparation Method: EPA 5035A Surrogates Toluene-d8 (S) 109 % 70-130 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 2037-26-5 4-Bromo0uorobenzene(S) 100 % 1 70-130 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 460-00-4 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) 101 % 70-132 25 11/14/19 15:40 11/14/19 18:00 17060-07-0 Percent Moisture Analytical Method: ASTM D2974-87 Percent Moisture 67.5 % 0.10 1 11/13/19 17:11 Total Organic Carbon Analytical Method: EPA 9060A i Total Organic Carbon 47500 mg/kg 1850 1 11/16/19 11:34 7440-44-0 Total Organic Carbon 48400 mg/kg 1850 1 11/16/19 11:34 7440-44-0 Total Organic Carbon 48900 mgfkg 1850 1 11/16/19 11:34 7440-44-0 Total Organic Carbon 48500 mg/kg 1850 1 11/16/19 11:34 7440-44-0 Mean Total Organic Carbon 48400 mg/kg 1850 1 11/16/19 11:34 7440-44-0 - sample: D-2 Lab ID: 92453338002 iesu/ts reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for - Parameters Results Units Collected: 11/08/1911:00 Received: 11/12/19 10:45 Matrix: Solid percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Report Limit OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual BOB1 GCS Pesticides Analytical Method: EPA 081B Preparation Method: EPA 3546 Alddn NO ug/kg 5.6 1 11/1811914:08 11119/1911:04 309-00-2 alpha-BHC NO ug/k9 5.6 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:04 319-84-6 beta-BHC NO ug/kg 5.6 1 11/18/19 14:08 11119/1911:04 319-85-7 delta-BHC ND ug/kg 5.6 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:04 319-86-8 gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND ug/kg 5.6 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:04 58-89-9 Chlordane (Technical) NO uglkg 19.5 1 11118/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:04 57-74-9 4,4'-DDD NO ug/kg 5.6 1 11/18119 14:08 11/19/19 11:04 72-54-8 4,4'-DDE NO ugfkg 5.6 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:04 72-55-9 4,4'-DDT NO ug/kg 5.6 1 11118/1914:08 11/19/19 11:04 50-29-3 Dieldrin ND ug/kg 5.6 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:04 60-57-1 Endosulfan I NO ug/kg 5.6 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:04 959-98-8 Endosulfan II NO ug/kg 5.6 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:04 33213-65-9 Endosulfan sulfate ND ug/kg 5.6 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:04 1031-07-8 Enddn NO ug/kg 5.6 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:04 72-20-8 Enddn aldehyde NO ug/kg 5.6 1 11/18/19 14:08 11119/19 11:04 7421-93-4 Enddn ketone NO ug/kg 5.6 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:04 53494-70-5 Heptachlor NO ug/kg 5.6 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:04 76-44-8 Heptachlor epoxide NO uglkg 5.6 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:04 1024-57-3 Hexachlorobenzene NO uglkg 5.6 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:04 118-74-1 Methoxychlor NO ug/kg 14.0 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:04 72-43-5 Mirex NO ug/kg 14.0 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:04 2385-85-5 Toxaphene NO ug/kg 19.5 1 11118/1914:08 11/19/19 11:04 8001-35-2 Surrogates Tetrachloro-m-xylene (S) 52 % 15-130 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:04 877-09-8 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except In full, Date: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Page 8 of 52 i 1 Pace Analytical Services, LLC mAnalytical e 9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078078 www.pacelabs.com (704)875-9092 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 Sample: D-2 Lab ID: 92453338002 Collected: 11/08/19 11:00 Received: 11/12/19 10:45 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted toripercent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Unitsl Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 8081 GCS Pesticides 1 Analytical Method: EPA 8081E Preparation Method: EPA 3546 Surrogates Decachlorobiphenyl(S) 42 % 10-130 1 11/18119 14:08 11/19/19 11:04 2051-24-3 9071 Oil and Grease Analytical Method: 9071E Preparation Method: 9071B Oil and Grease ND mg/kd 193 1 11118/19 10:20 11/18/19 10:33 N2 MADEP EPH NC Soil Aliphatic (C09-C18) Aliphatic (C19-C36) Aromatic (C11-C22) Surrogates Nonatriacontane(S) o-Terphenyl(S) 2-Fluorobiphenyl (S) 2-Bromonaphthalene (S) VPH NC Soil ;liphalic (C05-008) Jiphatic (C09-C12) Aliphatic(C09-C12) Adjusted Aromatic (C09-C10) Surrogates 4-Bromofluorobenzene (FID)(S) 4-BromoOuorobenzene (PID) (S) 6010 MET ICP Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Cobalt Copper Lead Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Vanadium Zinc 7471 Mercury Mercury Date: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM Analytical Method: ND ND ND 65 72 99 94 Analytical Method ND ND ND NO 90 89 Analytical Method: EPA NO mg/k, 14.3 mg/k, 35.5 mg/k, 1.1 mg/kl 0.37 mg/kl 41.3 mg/kl 8.3 mg/k, 16.1 mg/k! 23.9 mg/k! 12.4 mg/k! NO mg/k! NO mg/k! NO mg/k! 56.6 mg/k! 81.3 mglk, Analytical Method: EPA 0.19 mq/k, REPORT This rep, Without the wd EPH Preparation Method: MADEP EPH 27.7 1 11/16/19 16:18 11/19/19 09:26 N2 27.7 1 11/16/19 16:18 11/19/19 09:26 N2 27.7 1 11/16/19 16:18 11/19/19 09:26 N2 40-140 1 11/16/19 16:18 11/19/19 09:26 7194-86-7 40-140 1 11/16/19 16:18 11/19/19 09:26 84-15-1 40-140 1 11/16/19 16:18 11/19/19 09:26 321-60-8 40-140 1 11/16/19 16:18 11/19/19 09:26 580-13-2 VPH Preparation Method: MADEP VPH 12.4 1 11/13/19 18:06 11/13/19 19:23 N2 12.4 1 11/13/19 18:06 11/13/19 19:23 N2 12.4 1 11/13/19 18:06 11/13/19 19:23 N2 12.4 1 11/13/19 18:06 11/13/19 19:23 N2 70-130 1 11/13/19 18:06 11/13/19 19:23 460-00-4 70-130 1 11/1311918:06 11113/1919:23 460-00-4 Preparation Methc 1.1 2.2 1.1 0.22 0.22 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 2.2 1.1 2.2 1.1 2.2 is EPA 3050E 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:24 7440-36-0 BC 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:24 7440-38-2 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:24 7440-39-3 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:24 7440-41-7 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:24 7440-43-9 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:24 7440-47-3 11115/1911:27 11/17/19 22:24 7440-48-4 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:24 7440-50-8 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:24 7439-92-1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:24 7440-02-0 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:24 7782-49-2 11115119 11:27 11/17/19 22:24 7440-22-4 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:24 7440-28-0 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:24 7440-62-2 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:24 7440-66-6 Preparation Method: EPA 7471 B 0.0095 1 11/15/19 10:48 11/19/19 14:26 7439-97-6 LABORATORY ANALYSIS call not be reproduced, except in full, consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Page 9 of 52 aceAnalj41cal www.pacelahs.com ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 Sample: D-2 Lab ID: 92453338002 Collected: 11/08/19 11:00 Received: 11/12/19 10:45 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units i Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Oual 8270E MSSV PAH Microwave Analytical Method: EPA 8270E Preparation Method: EPA 3546 Acenaphthene NO ug/kg ' 921 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/1811920:04 83-32-9 Acenaphthylene NO ug/kg i 921 1 11/18/1912:15 11/1811920:04 208-96-8 Anthracene ND ug/kg , 921 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:04 120-12-7 Benzo(a)anthraoene NO ug/kg 921 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:04 56-55-3 Benzo(a)pyrene NO ug/kg 921 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:04 50-32-8 Benzo(b)Ouoranthene NO ug/kg 921 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:04 205-99-2 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene NO ug/kg 921 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:04 191-24-2 Benzo(k)fluoranlhene NO ug/kg 921 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:04 207-08-9 Chrysene NO ug/kg 921 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:04 218-01-9 Dibenz(a,h)anlhracene NO ug/kg 921 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:04 53-70-3 Fluomnthene NO ug/kg 921 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:04 206-44-0 Fluorene NO ug/kg 921 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:04 86-73-7 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene NO ug/kg 921 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:04 193-39-5 1-Methylnaphthalene NO ug/kg 921 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:04 90-12-0 2-Methylnaphthalene NO ug/kg 921 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:04 91-57-6 Naphthalene NO ug/kg 921 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:04 91-20-3 Phenanthrene NO ug/kg 921 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:04 85-01-8 Iprene NO ug/kg 921 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:04 129-00-0 wrogates .itrobenzene-d5(S) 58 % 23-110 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:04 4165-60-0 2-Fluorobiphenyl(S) 46 % 30-110 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:04 321-60-8 Terphenyl-04 (S) 58 % 28-110 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:04 1718-51-0 8260D15035A Volatile Organics Analytical Method: EPA 8260D Preparation Method: EPA 5035A Acetone NO ug/kg! 325 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 14:38 67-64-1 Acrylonitdle NO ug/kg, 325 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 14:38 107-13-1 Benzene NO ug/kg 16.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 14:38 71-43-2 Bromochloromethane NO ug/kg 16.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 14:38 74-97-5 Bromodichloromethane NO ug/kg' 16.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11115/1914:38 75-27-4 Bromoform NO ug/kg 16.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 14:38 75-25-2 Bromomethane NO ug/kg 32.5 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 14:38 74-83-9 2-Butanone (MEK) NO ug/kg 325 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/1511914:38 78-93-3 Carbon disulfide NO ug/kg 32.5 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 14:38 75-15-0 Carbon tetrachloride NO ug/kg 16.3 1 11/16/19 11:02 11/16/19 14:38 56-23-5 Chlorobenzene NO ug/kg 16.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15119 14:38 108-90-7 Chloroethane NO ug/kg 32.5 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/1511914:38 75-00-3 Chloroform ND ug/kg 16.3 1 11115/1911:02 11115/1914:38 67-66-3 Chloromethane NO ug/kg 32.5 1 11/15/19 11:02 11115/1914:38 74-87-3 Dibromochloromethane ND ug/kg 16.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11115/1914:38 124-48-1 Dibromomethane ND ug/kg 16.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 14:38 74-95-3 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/kg 16.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 14:38 95-50-1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/kg 16.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 14:38 106-46-7 trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene NO ug/kg 16.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 14:38 110-57-6 1,1-Dichloroelhane ND ug/kg 16.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 14:38 75-34-3 1,2-Dichloroelhane NO ug/kg 16.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 14:38 107-06-2 1,1-Dichloroethene NO ug/kg 16.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11115/1914:38 75-35-4 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, L-C. vl Page 10 of 52 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 52ceiilnalXlcale 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 www.pacalabs.com (704)875-9092 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 Sample: D-2 Lab ID: 924533380021 Collected: 11/08/19 11:00 Received: 11/12/19 10:45 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for Ipercent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units I Report Limit OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qua] 826OD15035A Volatile Organics Analytical Method: EPA 8260D Preparation Method: EPA5035A cis-1,2-Dichloroethene NO ug/kgl 16.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 14:38 156-59-2 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene NO ug/kg 16.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 14:38 156-60-5 1,2-Dichloropropane NO ug/kgl 16.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 14:38 78-87-5 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene NO ug/kg 16.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 14:38 10061-01-5 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/kg 16.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 14:38 10061-02-6 Ethylbenzene NO ug/kg 16.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 14:38 100-41-4 2-Hexanone NO ug/kg 1 163 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 14:38 591-78-6 lodomethane ND ug/kg 32.5 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 14:38 74-88-4 v1 Methylene Chloride ND ug/kg1 65.1 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 14:38 75-09-2 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) NO ug/kg, 163 1 11/15/19 11:02 11115/1914:38 108-10-1 Styrene NO ug/kg 16.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 14:38 100-42-5 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane NO ug/kg 16.3 1 11115/1911:02 11/15/19 14:38 630-20-6 1,1,2,2-Tetrach]oroethane NO ug/kg 16.3 1 11115/1911:02 11/15/19 14:38 79-34-5 Tetrachloroethene NO ug/kg, 16.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 14:38 127-18-4 Toluene NO ug/kg 16.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 14:38 108-88-3 1,1,1-Trich]oroethane ND ug/kg 16.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 14:38 71-55-6 11,2-TJohlomethane ND ug/kg' 16.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 14:38 79-00-5 ,ich]oroethene NO ug/kg 16.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/1511914:38 79-01-6 uich]orofluoromethane NO ug/kg 16.3 1 11/16/19 11:02 11/15/19 14:38 75-69-4 1,2,3-Trichloropropane NO ug/kg 16.3 1 11/16/19 11:02 11/15/19 14:38 96-18-4 Vinyl acetate NO ug/kg1 163 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/16/19 14:38 108-05-4 Vinyl chloride NO ug/kg i 32.5 1 11/15/19 11:02 11115/1914:38 75-01-4 v1 Xylene (Total) NO ug/kg 1 32.5 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 14:38 1330-20-7 Surrogates I Toluene-d8 (S) 107 % ' 70-130 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/16/19 14:38 2037-26-5 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) 95 % 1 70-130 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 14:38 460-00-4 1,2-Dich]oroethane-d4 (S) 79 % 70-132 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 14:38 17060-07-0 Percent Moisture Analytical Method: ASTM D2974-87 Percent Moisture 64.2 % I 0.10 1 11/13/19 17:11 Total Organic Carbon Analytical Method: EPA 9060A Total Organic Carbon 39400 mg/kg'' 1670 1 11/1611912:01 7440-44-0 Total Organic Carbon 43400 mg/kg 1670 1 11/16/19 12:01 7440-44-0 Total Organic Carbon 43800 mg/kg' 1670 1 11/16/19 12:01 7440-44-0 Total Organic Carbon 43800 mg/kg� 1670 1 11/1611912:01 7440-44-0 Mean Total Organic Carbon 42600 mg/kgl 1670 1 11/16/19 12:01 7440-44-0 Sample: D-3 Lab ID: 924533380031 Collected: 1110811911:40 Received: 11/12/19 10:45 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted tbrpercent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units I Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 8081 GCS Pesticides Analytical Method: EPA 8081E Preparation Method: EPA 3546 AIdrin NO ug/kg 11 5.5 1 11/18/1914:08 11/19/1911:23 309-00-2 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except In full, Date: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Page 11 of 52 aceAnalj6cal e www.pacelabs.com ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Hunlersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 Sample: D-3 Lab ID: 92453338003 Collected: 11/08/19 11:40 Received: 11/12/19 10:45 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 8081 GCS Pesticides alpha-BHC beta-BHC delta-BHC gamma-BHC (Undane) Chlordane (Technical) 4,4'-DDD 4,4'-DDE 4,4'-DDT Dieldrin Endosulfan I Endosulfan II Endosulfan sulfate Endrin Endrin aldehyde Endrin ketone Heptachlor Heptachlor epoxide ';sxachlorobenzene elhoxychlor Mirex Toxaphene Surrogates Tetrachloro-m-xylene (S) Decachlorobiphenyl (S) 9071 Oil and Grease Oil and Grease MADEP EPH NC Soil Aliphatic (C09-C18) Aliphatic (C19-C36) Aromatic (C11-C22) Surrogates Nonatriacontane (S) o-Terphenyl(S) 2-Fluerobiphenyl(S) 2-Bromonaphthalene (S) VPH NC Soil Aliphatic (C05-CO8) Aliphatic (C09-C12) Aliphatic(C09-C 12) Adjusted Aromatic (C09-C10) Surrogates 4-Bromo luorobenzene (FID) (S) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (PID) (S) Analytical Method: EPA 8081B Preparation Method: EPA 3546 NO ug/kg 5.5 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:23 319-84-6 ND ug/kg 5.5 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:23 319-85-7 NO ug/kg 5.5 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19119 11:23 319-86-8 NO ug/kg 5.5 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:23 58-89-9 NO ug/kg 19.3 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:23 57-74-9 NO ug/kg 5.5 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:23 72-54-8 ND ug/kg 5.5 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:23 72-55-9 ND ug/kg 5.5 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:23 50-29-3 ND ug/kg 5.5 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:23 60-57-1 ND ug/kg 5.5 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:23 959-98-8 ND ug/kg 5.5 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:23 33213-65-9 ND ug/kg 5.5 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:23 1031-07-8 ND ug/kg 5.5 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:23 72-20-8 NO ug/kg 5.5 1 11/18/19 14:08 1111911911:23 7421-93-4 NO ug/kg 5.5 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19119 11:23 53494-70-5 ND ug/kg 5.5 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:23 76-44-8 NO ug/kg 5.5 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:23 1024-57-3 NO ug/kg 5.5 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:23 118-74-1 ND ug/kg 13.8 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:23 72-43-5 ND ug/kg 13.8 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:23 2385-85-5 ND ug/kg 19.3 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:23 8001-35-2 61 % 15-130 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:23 877-09-8 48 % 10-130 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:23 2051-24-3 Analytical Method: 9071B Preparation Method: 9071E NO mg/kg 194 1 11118/1910:20 11/1811910:33 Analytical Method: MADEP EPH Preparation Method: MADEP EPH ND mg/kg 27.4 1 11/16/19 16:18 11/19/19 09:54 ND mg/k9 27.4 1 11/16/19 16:18 11/1911909:54 NO mg/kg 27.4 1 11/16/19 16:18 11/19/19 09:54 75 % 40-140 1 11/16/19 16:18 11/19/19 09:54 7194-86-7 69 % 40-140 1 11/16/19 16:18 11/19/19 09:54 84-15-1 94 % 40-140 1 11/16119 16:18 11/19/19 09:54 321-60-8 76 % 40-140 1 11/16/19 16:18 11/19/19 09:54 580-13-2 Analytical Method: MADEP VPH Preparation Method: MADEP VPH N2 N2 N2 N2 ND mg/kg 13.1 1 11/1311918:06 11113/1919:53 N2 ND mg/kg 13.1 1 11/1311918:06 11/13/1919:53 N2 ND mg/kg 13.1 1 11/13/19 18:06 11/13/19 19:53 N2 ND mg/kgi 13.1 1 11/13/1918:06 11/13/1919:53 N2 92 % 70-130 1 11/13/19 18:06 11/13/19 19:53 460-00-4 92 % 70-130 1 11113/19 18:06 11/13/19 19:53 460-00-4 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Dale: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Page 12 of 52 aceAnalytical e W .pacelabsxanl ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100 Hunlersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 Sample: D-3 Lab ID: 924533380031 Collected: 11/0811911:40 Received: 11112119 10:45 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units ' Report Limit OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 6010 MET ICP Analytical Method: EPA 601 OD Preparation Method: EPA 3050B Antimony NO mg/kg 0.93 1 11/15/19 11:27 11117/1922:27 7440-36-0 BC Arsenic 13.5 mg/kg, 1.9 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:27 7440-38-2 Barium 25.7 mg/kg 0.93 1 11115/1911:27 11/1711922:27 7440-39-3 Beryllium 0.91 mg/kg 0.19 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:27 7440-41-7 Cadmium 0.32 mg/kg1 0.19 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:27 7440-43-9 Chromium 30.8 mg/kg1 0.93 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:27 7440-47-3 Cobalt 6.7 mg/kg 1, 0.93 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:27 7440-48-4 Copper 12.4 mg/kg 0.93 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:27 7440-50-8 Lead 16.3 mg/kg 0.93 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:27 7439-92-1 Nickel 9.6 mg/kg, 0.93 1 11/1511911:27 11/17/19 22:27 7440-02-0 Selenium NO mg/kg 1.9 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/1711922:27 7782-49-2 Silver NO mg/kg 1 0.93 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:27 7440-22-4 Thallium NO mg/kg 1.9 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:27 7440-28-0 Vanadium 44.9 mg/kg1 0.93 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:27 7440-62-2 Zinc 65.8 mg/kg, 1.9 1 11/1511911:27 11/17/19 22:27 7440-66-6 7471 Mercury Analytical Method: EPA 7471E Preparation Method: EPA 7471B )ercury 0.087 mg/kg, 0.0056 1 11/15/19 10:48 11/19/19 14:28 7439-97-6 6270E MSSV PAH Microwave Analytical Method: EPA 8,270E Preparation Method: EPA 3546 Acenaphthene ND ug/kg 904 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:38 83-32-9 Acenaphthylene NO ug/kg 904 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/16/19 20:38 208-96-8 Anthracene NO ug/kg, 904 1 11118/1912:15 11/1811920:38 120-12-7 Benzo(a)anthracene NO ug/kg 904 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:38 56-55-3 Benzo(a)pyrene NO ug/kg 904 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:38 50-32-8 Benzo(b)Ouoranthene NO ug/kgi 904 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:38 205-99-2 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene NO ug/kg 904 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:38 191-24-2 Benzo(k)0uoranthene NO ug/kg 904 1 11/1811912:15 11/18/19 20:38 207-08-9 Chrysene NO ug/kg, 904 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:38 218-01-9 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene NO ug/kg 904 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:38 53-70-3 Fluoranthene NO ug/kg, 904 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:38 206-44-0 Fluorene NO ug/kg 904 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:38 86-73-7 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene NO ug/kg 904 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:38 193-39-5 1-Methy1naphthalene NO ug/kg 904 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:38 90-12-0 2-Methylnaphthalene NO ug/kg 1 904 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:38 91-57-6 Naphthalene NO ug/kg 904 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:38 91-20-3 Phenanthrene NO ug/kg 904 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:38 85-01-8 Pyrene NO ug/kg 904 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:38 129-00-0 Surrogates Nitrobenzene-d5 (S) 62 % 23-110 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:38 4165-60-0 2-Fluorobiphenyl(S) 63 % 30-110 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:38 321-60-8 Terpheny1-d14 (S) 62 % 28-110 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 20:38 1718-51-0 8260D/5035A Volatile Organics Analytical Method: EPA 8260D Preparation Method: EPA 5035A Acetone 354 ug/kg 316 1 11/15/19 11:02 11115/19 15:26 67-64-1 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This reporLhall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM without the wdhen consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Page 13 of 52 aceAnaljftal e www.Dacelabuom ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 Sample: D-3 Lab ID: 92453338003 Collected: 11108/1911:40 Received: 11/12/19 10:45 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. 8260D15035A Volatile Organics Analytical Method: EPA 9260D Preparation Method: EPA 5035A Acrylonitrile ND ug/kg 316 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 107-13-1 Benzene ND ug/kg 15.8 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 71-43-2 Bromochloromethane ND ug/kg 15.8 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 74-97-5 Bromodichlaromethane ND ug/kg 15.8 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 75-27-4 Bromoform ND ug/kg 15.8 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 75-25-2 Bromomethane ND ug/kg 31.6 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 74-83-9 2-Bulanone (MEK) ND ug/kg 316 1 11115/19 11:02 11/16/19 15:26 78-93-3 Carbon disulfide ND ug/kg 31.6 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 75-15-0 Carbon tetrachloride ND ug/kg 15.8 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 56-23-5 Chlorobenzene ND ug/kg 15.8 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 108-90-7 Chloroethane ND ug/kg 31.6 1 11115/1911:02 11/15/19 15:26 75-00-3 Chloroform ND ug/kg 15.8 1 11/15119 11:02 11/15119 15:26 67-66-3 Chloromethane ND ug/kg 31.6 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15119 15:26 74-87-3 Dibromochloromethane ND ug/kg 15.8 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 124-48-1 Dibromomethane ND ug/kg 15.8 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 74-95-3 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/kg 15.8 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 95-50-1 _ 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/kg 15.8 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 106-46-7 --ans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene ND ug/kg 15.8 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/16/19 15:26 110-57-6 .,1-Dichloroethane ND ug/kg 15.8 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 75-34-3 1,2-Dichloroelhane ND ug/kg 15.8 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 107-06-2 1,1-Dichloroethene ND ug/kg 15.8 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 75-35-4 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/kg 15.8 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 156-59-2 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/kg 15.8 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 156-60-5 1,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/kg 15.8 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 78-87-5 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/kg 15.8 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 10061-01-5 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/kg 15.8 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 10061-02-6 Ethylbenzene ND ug/kg 15.8 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 100-41-4 2-Hexanone ND ug/kg 158 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 16:26 591-78-6 Iodomelhane ND ug/kg 31.6 1 11115/19 11:02 11/15119 15:26 74-88-4 Methylene Chloride ND ug/kg 63.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 75-09-2 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) ND ug/kg 158 1 11/15/19 11:02 1111511915:26 108-10-1 Styrene ND ug/kg 15.8 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 100-42-5 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/kg 15.8 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 630-20-6 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/kg 15.8 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 79-34-5 Tetrachloroethene ND uglkg 15.8 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 127-18-4 Toluene ND uglkg 15.8 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 108-88-3 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND uglkg 15.8 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 71-55-6 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ug/kg 15.8 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 16:26 79-00-5 Trchloroethene ND ug/kg 15.8 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 79-01-6 Trichloroflucromethane ND ug/kg 15.8 1 11115119 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 75-69-4 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND ug/kg 15.8 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 96-18-4 Vinyl acetate ND ug/kg 158 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 108-05-4 Vinyl chloride ND ug/kg 31.6 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 75-014 Xylene (Total) ND ug/kg 31.6 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 1330-20-7 Surrogates Toluene-d8 (S) 110 % 70-130 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 2037-26-5 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This repo shall not be reproduced, except in full, Dale: 11I2012019 12:24 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, I.I.C. Qual A M1 vl vi Page 14 of 52 aceAnalXlcal www.pacelabs.com ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 Sample: D3 Lab ID: 92453338003 Collected: 11/08/19 11:40 Received: 11/12/19 10:45 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted forpercent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units � Report Limit OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Oual 8260D15035A Volatile Organics Analytical Method: EPA 8260D Preparation Method: EPA 5035A Surrogates 4-Bromofluorobenzene(S) 99 % 70-130 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 460-00-4 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) 79 % 70-132 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:26 17060-07-0 Percent Moisture Analytical Method: AST D2974-87 Percent Moisture 63.5 % 0.10 1 11/13/1917:11 Total Organic Carbon Analytical Method: EPA E 060A Total Organic Carbon 42800 mg/kg 1640 1 11/16/19 12:11 7440-44-0 Total Organic Carbon 39200 mg/kg 1640 1 11/16/19 12:11 7440-44-0 Total Organic Carbon 39100 mg/kg 1640 1 11/16/19 12:11 7440-44-0 Total Organic Carbon 40000 mg/kg 1640 1 11/16/19 12:11 7440-44-0 Mean Total Organic Carbon 40300 mg/kg 1640 1 11/16/19 12:11 7440-44-0 Sample: D-4 Lab ID: 924533380041 Collected: 11/08/19 12:20 Received: 11/12/19 10:45 Matrix: Solid esu/fs reported on a "dry weight"basis and are adjusted forpercent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units I Report Limit OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Oual 8081 GCS Pesticides Analytical Method: EPA §081B Preparation Method: EPA 3546 Alddn ND ug/kg 5.2 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/1911911:41 309-00-2 alpha-BHC NO uglkg 5.2 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19119 11:41 319-84-6 beta-BHC NO ug/kg 5.2 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:41 319-85-7 delta-BHC NO ug/kg 5.2 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:41 319-86-8 gamma-BHC (Lindane) NO ug/kg 5.2 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:41 58-89-9 Chlordane (Technical) NO ug/kg 18.2 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:41 57-74-9 4,4'-DDD ND uglkg 5.2 1 11/18/19 14:08 11119/1911:41 72-54-8 4,4'-DDE NO ug/kg 5.2 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:41 72-55-9 4,4'-DDT ND uglkg 5.2 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:41 50-29-3 Dieldrin NO ug/kg 5.2 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:41 60-57-1 Endosulfan I NO ug/kg 5.2 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:41 959-98-8 Endosulfan ll NO ug/kg 5.2 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:41 33213-65-9 Endosulfan sulfate NO ug/kg 5.2 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:41 1031-07-8 Endrin NO ug/kg 5.2 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:41 72-20-8 Endrin aldehyde ND ug/kg 5.2 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:41 7421-93-4 Endrin ketone ND ug/kg 5.2 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:41 53494-70-5 Heptachlor ND ug/kg 5.2 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:41 76-44-8 Heptachlor epoxide NO ug/kg 5.2 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:41 1024-57-3 Hexachlorobenzene NO ug/kg 5.2 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:41 118-74-1 Methoxychlor NO ug/kg 13.0 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/1911:41 72-43-5 Mhex NO ug/kg 13.0 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:41 2385-85-5 Toxaphene NO ug/kg 18.2 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:41 8001-35-2 Surrogates Tetrachloro-m-xylene (S) 70 % 15-130 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:41 877-09-8 17ecachlorobiphenyl(S) 76 % 10-130 1 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 11:41 2051-24-3 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This repel shall not be reproduced, except in full, Dale: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, I.I.C. Page 15 of 52 aceAnalytical e www.pacelilimont ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 Sample: DA Lab ID: 92453338004 Collected: 11108/1912:20 Received: 11112119 10:45 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units ' Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 9071 Oil and Grease Oil and Grease MADEP EPH NC Soil Aliphatic (C09-C18) Aliphatic (C19-C36) Aromatic (C11-C22) Surrogates Nonatriacontane (S) o-Terphenyl(S) 2-Fluorobiphenyl (S) 2-Bromonaphthalene (S) VPH NC Soil Aliphatic (C05-008) Aliphatic (C09-C12) Aliphatic(C09-C12) Adjusted +rornatic (C09-C10) surrogates .: Bromofluorobenzene (FID) (S) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (PID) (S) 6010 MET ICP Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Cobalt Copper Lead Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Vanadium Zinc 7471 Mercury Mercury 8270E MSSV PAH Microwave Acenaphthene Acenaphlhylene Anthmcene Dale: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM Analytical Method: 90718 Preparation Method: 9071 B ND mg/kg � 179 1 11/18/19 10:20 11118/1910:33 Analytical Method: MADI ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg 72 % 76 % 72 % 31 % Analytical Method: MAD[ ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg 92 % 92 % Analytical Method: EPA E ND 12.4 25.7 0.87 0.28 32.2 6.6 13.3 21.8 9.4 ND ND NO 44.6 69.4 Analytical Method: EPA 0.14 Analytical Method: N2 EPH Preparation Method: MADEP EPH 25.8 1 11/1611916:18 11/19/19 10:21 N2 25.8 1 11116/1916:18 11119/1910:21 N2 25.8 1 11/16/19 16:18 11119/1910:21 N2 40-140 1 11/16/19 16:18 11/19/19 10:21 7194-86-7 40-140 1 11/16/19 16:18 11/19/19 10:21 84-15-1 40-140 1 11/16/19 16:18 11119/19 10:21 321-60-8 40-140 1 11/16/19 16:18 11/19/19 10:21 580-13-2 SO VPH Preparation Method: MADEP VPH 11.9 1 11/13/19 18:06 11/13/19 20:22 11.9 1 11/13/19 18:06 11/13/19 20:22 11.9 1 11/13/19 18:06 11/13/19 20:22 11.9 1 11/13/19 18:06 11/13/19 20:22 70-130 1 11/13/19 18:06 11/13/1920:22 460-00-4 70-130 1 11/13/19 18:06 11/1311920:22 460-00-4 Preparation Method: EPA 3050B 0.96 1 11/15/19 11:27 11117/1922:30 7440-36-0 1.9 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:30 7440-38-2 0.96 1 11/15/19 11:27 11117/1922:30 7440-39-3 0.19 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:30 7440-41-7 0.19 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:30 7440-43-9 0.96 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:30 7440-47-3 0.96 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/1711922:30 7440-48-4 0.96 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:30 7440-50-8 0.96 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:30 7439-92-1 0.96 1 11/1511911:27 11/17/19 22:30 7440-02-0 1.9 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:30 7782-49-2 0.96 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:30 7440-22-4 1.9 1 11/1511911:27 11/17/19 22:30 7440-28-0 0.96 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:30 7440-62-2 1.9 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:30 7440-66-6 Preparation Method: EPA 7471 B 0.023 5 11/15/19 10:48 11/19/19 15:28 7439-97-6 Preparation Method: EPA 3546 ND ug/kg 848 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 21:13 83-32-9 ND ug/kg 848 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 21:13 208-96-8 ND ug/kgj 848 1 11/18119 12:15 11/18/19 21:13 120-12-7 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This repo r� shall not be reproduced, except in full, Without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, U.C. N2 N2 N2 N2 BC Page 16 of 52 Pace Analytical Services, LLC aceAnalydcal a 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 www.pacelabs.cem (704)875-9092 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 r Sample: D-4 Lab ID: 92453338004 Collected: 11/0811912:20 Received: 11/12/19 10:45 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight' basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Oual 8270E MSSV PAH Microwave Analytical Method: EPA 8270E Preparation Method: EPA 3546 Benzo(a)anthracene ND ug/kg 848 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 21:13 56-55-3 Benzo(a)pyrene ND ug/kg 848 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 21:13 50-32-8 Benzo(b)fiuoranthene ND ug/kg 848 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 21:13 205-99-2 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ND ug/kg 848 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 21:13 191-24-2 Benzo(k)auoranthene ND ug/kg 848 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 21:13 207-08-9 Chrysene ND ug/kg 848 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 21:13 218-01-9 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND ug/kg 848 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 21:13 53-70-3 Fluoranlhene ND ug/kg 848 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/1811921:13 206-44-0 Fluorene ND ug/kg 848 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 21:13 86-73-7 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND ug/kg 848 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 21:13 193-39-5 1-Methylnaphthalene ND ug/kg 848 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 21:13 90-12-0 2-Methylnaphthalene ND ug/kg 848 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 21:13 91-57-6 Naphthalene ND ug/kg 848 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 21:13 91-20-3 Phenanlhrene ND ug/kg 848 1 1111811912:15 11118/1921:13 85-01-8 Pyrene ND ug/kg 848 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 21:13 129-00-0 Surrogates _ 1,11trobenzene-d5(S) 62 % 23-110 1 1111811912:15 11/18/19 21:13 4165-60-0 - Fluombiphenyl(S) 61 % 30-110 1 11/18/19 12:15 11/18/19 21:13 321-60-8 eryhenyl-dl4(S) 65 % 28-110 1 1111811912:15 1111811921:13 1718-51-0 8260D/5035A Volatile Organics Analytical Method: EPA 260D Preparation Method: EPA 5035A Acetone ND ug/kg 289 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:51 67-64-1 Acrylonitrile ND ug/kg 289 1 1111511911:02 11/15/19 15:51 107-13-1 Benzene ND ug/kg 14.4 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:51 71-43-2 Bromochloromethane ND ug/kg 14.4 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:51 74-97-5 Bromodichloromethane ND ug/kg 14.4 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:51 75-27-4 Bromoform ND ug/kg 14.4 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:51 75-25-2 Bromomethane ND ug/kg 28.9 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:51 74-83-9 2-Butanone (MEK) ND ug/kgl 289 1 11115/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:51 78-93-3 Carbon disulfide ND ug/kgl 28.9 1 11115/1911:02 11/15/19 15:51 75-15-0 Carbon tetrachloride ND ug/kgl 14.4 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:51 56-23-5 v1 Chlorobenzene ND ug/kg1 14.4 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:51 108-90-7 Chloroethane ND ug/kg 28.9 1 11/1511911:02 11115/1915:51 75-00-3 Chloroform ND ug/kg 14.4 1 11/15119 11:02 11115119 15:51 67-66-3 Chloromethane ND ug/kg 28.9 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:51 74-87-3 Dibromochloromethane ND ug/k9 14.4 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:51 124-48-1 Dibromomethane ND ug/kg 14.4 1 11/16/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:51 74-95-3 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/kg 14.4 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/16/19 15:51 95-50-1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/kg 14.4 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:51 10646-7 trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene ND ug/k1 14.4 1 11115/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:51 110-57-6 1,1-Dichloroelhane ND ug/kg1 14.4 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:51 75-34-3 1,2-Dichloroelhane ND ug/ky 14.4 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:51 107-06-2 1,1-Dichloroethene ND ug/k� 14.4 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:51 75-35-4 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/k 14.4 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:51 156-59-2 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/kg 14.4 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 16:51 156-60-5 1,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/kg 14.4 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:51 78-87-5 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full. Dale: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Page 17 of 52 aceAnalytical e a ..pacelaba.com ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 Sample: D-4 Lab ID: 92453338004 Collected: 11/08/19 12:20 Received: 11/12/19 10:45 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Oual 8260DI5035A Volatile Organics cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene 2-Hexanone lodomelhane Methylene Chloride 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) Styrene 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1,1,1-Tdchloroelhane 1,1,2-Tdchloroethane Trichloroelhene Trichlorolluoromelhane 2,3-Tdchloropropane `(nyl acetate Inyl chloride Xylene (Total) Surrogates Toluene-d8 (S) 4-Bromonuorobenzene (S) 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) Percent Moisture Analytical Method: EPA 8 ND ug/kg ND ug/kg ND ug/kg ND ug/kg ND ug/kg NO ug/kg NO ug/kg NO ug/kg NO ug/kg NO ug/kg NO ug/kg NO ug/kg NO ug/kg NO ug/kg ND ug/kg NO ug/kg ND ug/kg ND ug/kg ND ug/kg ND ug/kg 110 % 96 % 71 % Analytical Method: AS- 260D Preparation Method: EPA 5035A 14.4 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:51 10061-01-5 14.4 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:51 10061-02-6 14.4 1 11 / 15119 11:02 11 /15119 15:51 10041-4 144 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:51 591-78-6 28.9 1 11/15/19 11:02 11115/19 15:51 74-88-4 57.8 1 11/15/19 11:02 11115/19 15:51 75-09-2 144 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:51 108-10-1 14.4 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:51 100-42-5 14.4 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:51 630-20-6 14.4 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:51 79-34-5 14.4 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:51 127-184 14.4 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:51 108-88-3 14.4 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:51 71-55-6 14.4 1 11/16/19 11:02 11115/19 15:51 79-00-5 14.4 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:51 79-01-6 14.4 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:51 75-69-4 14.4 1 11/15/19 11:02 11 /15119 15:51 96-18-4 144 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15119 15:51 108-05-4 28.9 1 11 / 15119 11:02 11 /15119 15:51 75-01-4 28.9 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:51 1330-20-7 D2974-87 70-130 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:51 2037-26-5 70-130 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/15/19 15:51 460-004 70-132 1 11/15/19 11:02 11115/19 15:51 17060-07-0 v1 v1 Percent Moisture 61.6 % I 0.10 1 11/13/19 17:11 Total Organic Carbon Analytical Method: EPA 9060A Total Organic Carbon 38600 mg/kg 1560 1 11/1611912:20 7440-44-0 Total Organic Carbon 36700 mg/kg 1560 1 11/16/19 12:20 7440-44-0 Total Organic Carbon 36900 mg/kg 1560 1 11/16/19 12:20 7440-44-0 Total Organic Carbon 37700 mg/kg 1560 1 11/16/19 12:20 7440-44-0 Mean Total Organic Carbon 37500 mg/kg 1560 1 11/16/19 12:20 7440-44-0 Sample: D5 LAID: 92453338005 Collected: 11/08/19 13:45 Received: 11/12/19 10:45 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for ercent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qua] 8081 GCS Pesticides Analytical Method: EPA 8061E Preparation Method: EPA 3546 Aldrin ND ug/kg 22.2 4 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 12:00 309-00-2 alpha-BHC ND ug/kg 22.2 4 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 12:00 319-84-6 beta-BHC ND ug/kg 22.2 4 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 12:00 319-85-7 "elta-BHC ND ug/kg 22.2 4 11/18/19 14:08 11/1911912:00 319-86-8 a REPORT QF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM without the writt�n consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Page 18 of 52 aceAnalytical e w .iucelebsxom ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Hunlersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 Sample: D-5 Lab ID: 92453338005 Collected: 11/08/19 13:45 Received: 11/12/19 10:45 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Oual 8081 GCS Pesticides Analytical Method: EPA 8081 B Preparation Method: EPA 3546 gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND ug/kg 22.2 4 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 12:00 58-89-9 Chlordane (Technical) ND ug/kg 77.6 4 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 12:00 57-74-9 4,4'-DDD NO ug/kg 22.2 4 11118/1914:08 11/19/19 12:00 72-54-8 4,4'-DDE ND ug/kg 22.2 4 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 12:00 72-55-9 4,4'-DDT NO ug/kg 22.2 4 11/18/19 14:08 11119/1912:00 50-29-3 Dieldrin ND ug/kg 22.2 4 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 12:00 60-57-1 EndosulfanI ND ug/kg 22.2 4 11/18/19 14:08 11119119 12:00 959-98-8 Endosulfan II - ND ug/kg 22.2 4 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 12:00 33213-65-9 Endosulfan sulfate ND ug/kg 22.2 4 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 12:00 1031-07-8 Endrin ND ug/kg 22.2 4 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 12:00 72-20-8 Endrin aldehyde ND ug/kg 22.2 4 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 12:00 7421-93-4 Endrin ketone ND ug/kg 22.2 4 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 12:00 53494-70-5 Heptachlor NO ug/kg 22.2 4 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 12:00 76-44-8 Heptachlor epoxide NO ug/kg 22.2 4 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 12:00 1024-57-3 Hexachlorobenzene ND ug/kg 22.2 4 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 12:00 118-74-1 Methoxychlor NO ug/kg 55.4 4 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 12:00 72-43-5 Mirex ND ug/kg 66.4 4 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 12:00 2385-85-5 3xaphene ND ug/kg 77.6 4 11118119 14:08 11/19/19 12:00 8001-35-2 "'urrogates -- ietrachloro-m-xylene (S) 67 % 15-130 4 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 12:00 877-09-8 D3 Decachlorobiphenyl(S) 95 % 10-130 4 11/18/19 14:08 11/19/19 12:00 2051-24-3 9071 Oil and Grease Analytical Method: 9071B Preparation Method: 9071B Oil and Grease NO mgikg I 195 1 11/18/19 10:20 11/18119 10:33 N2 MADEP EPH NC Soil Aliphatic (C09-C18) Aliphatic (C19-C36) Aromatic (C11-C22) Surrogates Nonatriacontane (S) o-Terphenyl(S) 2-Fluorobiphenyl (S) 2-Bromonaphthalene (S) VPH NC Soil Aliphatic (CO5-COB) Aliphatic (C09-C12) Aliphatic(C09-C12) Adjusted Aromatic (C09-C10) Surrogates 4-Bromofluorobenzene (FID)(S) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (PID)(S) 6010 MET ICP - Antimony Date: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM Analytical Method: MAD P EPH Preparation Method: MADEP EPH NO mg/kg 28.3 1 11/16/19 16:18 11/19/19 10:49 ND mg/kg 28.3 1 11116/1916:18 11119/1910:49 NO mglkg 28.3 1 11/16/19 16:18 11/19/19 10:49 73 % 40-140 1 11/16/19 16:16 11/19/19 10:49 7194-86-7 65 % 40-140 1 11/16/19 16:18 11/19/19 10:49 84-15-1 93 % 40-140 1 1111611916:18 11/19/19 10:49 321-60-8 89 % 40-140 1 11116119 16:18 11/19/19 10:49 580-13-2 Analytical Method: ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mg/kg ND mgikg 96 % 95 % Analytical Method: EPA NO mg/kg Preparation Method: MADEP VPH 12.7 1 11/13/19 18:06 11/13/19 20:51 12.7 1 11/13/19 18:06 11/13/19 20:51 12.7 1 11/13/19 18:06 11/13119 20:51 12.7 1 11/13/19 18:06 11/13/19 20:51 70-130 1 11/13/19 18:06 11/13/19 20:51 460-00-4 70-130 1 11/13/19 18:06 11113/19 20:51 460-00-4 1OD Preparation Method: EPA 3050B N2 N2 N2 N2 N2 N2 N2 0.98 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:33 7440-36-0 BC REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, U.C. Page 19 of 52 aceAnalytical e www.pacelfllimam ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersviile, NC 28078 (704)875.9092 Sample: D-5 Lab ID: 92453338005 Collected: 11108/19 13:45 Received: 11/12119 10:45 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for�jrercent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 6010 MET ICP Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Cobalt Copper Lead Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Vanadium Zinc 7471 Mercury , ,ercury 170E MSSV PAH Microwave Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthmcene Benzo(a)anthmcene Benzo(a)pyrene Benzo(b)Ouoranthene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Benzo(k)0uomnlhene Chrysene Dibenz(a,h)anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1-Methylnaphlhalene 2-Methylnaphlhalene Naphthalene Phenanlhrene Pyrene Surrogates Nitrobenzene-d5 (S) 2-Fluorobiphenyl(S) Terphenyl-d14 (S) 8260DI5035A Volatile Organics Acetone Acrylonitrile t Date: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM i Analytical Method: EPA 601 OD Preparation Method: EPA 3050E 8.9 22.2 0.67 0.26 26.2 5.4 12.3 17.6 8.0 NO ND ND 33.7 56.2 Analytical Method: EPA 0.11 Analytical Method: EPA NO NO NO NO NO NO ND ND NO NO ND NO ND NO NO NO NO NO 62 % 48 % 38 % Analytical Method: EPA ND ug/kc NO ua/kc 2.0 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:33 7440-38-2 0.98 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:33 7440-39-3 0.20 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:33 7440-41-7 0.20 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:33 7440-43-9 0.9B 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:33 7440-47-3 0.98 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:33 7440-48-4 0.98 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:33 7440-50-8 0.98 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:33 7439-92-1 0.98 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:33 7440-02.0 2.0 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:33 7782-49-2 0.98 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:33 7440-22-4 2.0 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:33 7440-28-0 0.98 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/1711922:33 7440-62-2 2.0 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:33 7440-66.6 Preparation Method: EPA 7471 B 0.0051 1 11/15/19 10:48 11/19/19 14:33 7439-97-6 Preparation Method: EPA 3546 930 1 11/19/19 12:25 11/19/19 13:10 83-32-9 930 1 11/1911912:25 11/19/19 13:10 208-96-8 930 1 11/19/19 12:25 11/19/19 13:10 120-12-7 930 1 11/19/19 12:25 11/19/19 13:10 56-55-3 930 1 11/19/19 12:25 11/19/19 13:10 50-32-8 930 1 11/19/19 12:25 11/19/19 13:10 205-99-2 930 1 11/19/19 12:25 11/19/19 13:10 191-24-2 930 1 11/19/19 12:25 11/19/19 13:10 207-08-9 930 1 11/19/19 12:25 11/19/19 13:10 218-01-9 930 1 11/19/19 12:25 11/19/19 13:10 53-703 930 1 11/19/19 12:25 11/19/19 13:10 206-44-0 930 1 11/1911912:25 11/19/19 13:10 86-73-7 930 1 11/19/19 12:25 11/19/19 13:10 193-39-5 930 1 11/19/19 12:25 11/19/19 13:10 90-12-0 930 1 11/19/19 12:25 11/19/19 13:10 91-57-6 930 1 11/19/19 12:25 11/1911913:10 91-20-3 930 1 11/19/19 12:25 11/19119 13:10 85-01-8 930 1 11/19/19 12:25 11/19/19 13:10 129-00-0 23-110 1 11/19/19 12:25 11/19/19 13:10 4165-60-0 30-110 1 11/19119 12:25 11/19/19 13:10 321-60-8 28-110 1 11/19/19 12:25 11/19/19 13:10 1718-51-0 Preparation Method: EPA 5035A 306 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 67-64-1 306 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 107-13-1 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This without thi tall not be reproduced, except in full, consent of Pace Analytical Services, L-C. Page 20 of 52 aceAnalytical w ..pacelabsxam ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 Sample: D-5 Lab ID: 92453338005 Collected: 11/08/19 13:45 Received: 11/12/19 10:45 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 8260D15035A Volatile Organics Analytical Method: EPA 8260D Preparation Method: EPA 5035A Benzene ND ug/kg 15.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 71-43-2 Bromochloromethane NO ug/kg 15.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 74-97-5 Bromodichloromelhane NO ug/kg 15.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 75-27-4 Bromoform NO ug/kg 15.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 75-25-2 Bromomethane NO ug/kg 30.6 1 11115/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 74-83-9 2-Butanone (MEK) NO ug/kg 306 1 11/15/19 11:02 11118/19 11:45 78-93-3 Carbon disulfide NO ug/kg 30.6 1 11/15/19 11:02 11118/19 11:45 75-15-0 Carbon tetrachloride ND ug/kg 15.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 56-23-5 Chlorobenzene NO ug/kg 15.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 108-90-7 Chloroethane ND ug/kg 30.6 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 75-00-3 Chloroform ND ug/kg 15.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 67-66-3 Chloromelhane ND ug/kg 30.6 1 11/16/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 74-87-3 Dibromochloromethane ND ug/kg 15.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 124-48-1 Dibromomethane ND ug/kg 15.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 74-95-3 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/kg 15.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 95-50-1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/kg 15.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 106-46-7 tans-1,4-Dichlorc-2-butene NO ug/kg 15.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 110-57-6 1-Dichloroethane NO ug/kg 15.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/1811911:45 75-34-3 ,2-Dichlomethane NO ug/kg 15.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 107-06-2 1,1-Dichloroethene ND ug/kg 15.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 75-35-4 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/kg 15.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/1811911:45 156-59-2 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/kg 15.3 1 11/15119 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 156-60-5 1,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/kg 15.3 1 11/15119 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 78-87-5 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/kg 15.3 1 11/15119 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 10061-01-5 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/kg 15.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 10061-02-6 Elhylbenzene ND ug/kg 15.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18119 11:45 100-41-4 2-Hexanone ND ug/kg 153 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 591-78-6 lodomelhane ND ug/kg 30.6 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 74-88-4 Methylene Chloride ND ug/kg 61.2 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 75-09-2 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) ND ug/kg 153 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 108-10-1 Styrene NO ug/kg 15.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 100-42-5 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/kg 15.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 630-20-6 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane NO ug/kg 15.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 79-34-5 Tetrachloroethene ND ug/kg 15.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 127-18-4 Toluene NO ug/kg 15.3 1 11115/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 108-88-3 1,1,1-T6chloroelhane ND ug/kg 15.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 71-55-6 1,12-Trichloroelhane ND ug/kg 15.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 79-00-5 Trichloroethene ND ug/kg 15.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 79-01-6 Trichlorofluoromethane ND ug/kg 16.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 75-69-4 1,2,3-Tdchloropropane NO ug/kg 15.3 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 96-18-4 Vinyl acetate NO ug/kg 153 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 108-05-4 Vinyl chloride NO ug/kg 30.6 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 75-01-4 Xylene (Total) ND ug/kg 30.6 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 1330-20-7 Surrogates Toluene-d8 (S) 104 % 70-130 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 2037-26-5 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) 94 % 1 70-130 1 11/15119 11:02 11/1811911:45 460-00-4 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Li-C. Page 21 of 52 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 aceAnalytical Huntersville, NC 28078 www.pacelabs.com (704)875-9092 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 Sample: D-5 Lab ID: 92453338005 Collected: 11/08/19 13:45 Received: 11112/19 10:45 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted forpercent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units I Report Limit OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 8260D/5035A Volatile Organics Analytical Method: EPA 8260D Preparation Method: EPA 5035A Surrogates 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) 69 % 70-132 1 11/15/19 11:02 11/18/19 11:45 17060-07-0 S1 Percent Moisture Analytical Method: ASTM D2974-87 Percent Moisture 64.2 % 0.10 1 11/13/19 17:11 Total Organic Carbon Analytical Method: EPA 9060A Total Organic Carbon 41700 mg/kgi 1670 1 11/16/19 12:30 7440-44-0 Total Organic Carbon 33000 mg/kgi 1670 1 11/16/19 12:30 7440-44-0 Total Organic Carbon 35500 mglkg 1670 1 11/16/19 12:30 744044-0 Total Organic Carbon 36800 mg/kg 1670 1 11/16/19 12:30 744044-0 Mean Total Organic Carbon 36700 mg/kg 1670 1 11116/19 12:30 744044-0 Sample: D-1 Duplicate Lab ID: 92453338007, Collected: 11/08/19 10:15 Received: 11/12/1910:45 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted torpercent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. - Parameters Results Unilsl Report Limit OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual JJ10 MET ICP Analytical Method: EPA 010D Preparation Method: EPA 3050B Antimony NO mg/k 0.86 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:36 7440-36-0 BC Arsenic 13.1 mg/kd 1.7 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:36 7440-38-2 Barium 30.6 mg/kg' 0.86 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:36 7440-39-3 Beryllium 1.0 mglkd 0.17 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:36 7440-41-7 Cadmium 0.31 mg/kd 0.17 1 11/1511911:27 11/17/19 22:36 7440-43-9 Chromium 34.4 mg/k 0.86 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:36 7440-47-3 Cobalt 8.0 mg/kg 0.86 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:36 7440-48-4 Copper 14.7 mg/kg 0.86 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:36 7440-50-8 Lead 19.2 mglkd 0.86 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:36 7439-92-1 Nickel 11.1 mg/k 1 0.86 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:36 7440-02-0 Selenium NO mg/kl 1.7 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:36 7782-49-2 Silver NO mg/kq 0.86 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:36 7440-22-4 Thallium NO mg/kg 1.7 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:36 7440-28-0 Vanadium 50.2 mg 0.86 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:36 7440-62-2 Zinc 78.6 mg/k1 1.7 1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:36 7440-66-6 7471 Mercury Analytical Method: EPA Ij7471B Preparation Method: EPA 7471B Mercury 0.11 mg/kg 0.0088 1 11/15/19 10:48 11/19/19 14:36 7439-97-6 Percent Moisture Analytical Method: ASTM D2974-87 Percent Moisture 67.5 % 0.10 1 11/13/19 17:11 Total Organic Carbon Analytical Method: EPA r9060A Total Organic Carbon 50800 mg/kg 1850 1 11/16/19 12:45 7440-44-0 Total Organic Carbon 51900 mg/kg 1850 1 11/16/1912:45 7440-44-0 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This repott shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM without the wdtlen consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Page 22 of 52 i Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1 ceAndl, kal 9800 ncey Ave. Suite 100 �/( Huntersville, NC 28078078 www.pacelabs.com (704)875-9092 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 Sample: D-1 Duplicate Lab ID: 92453338007 Collected: 11/0811910:15 Received: 11/12/19 10:45 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight' basis and are adjusted for�percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units Report Limit OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qua[ Total Organic Carbon Analytical Method: EPA 9060A Total Organic Carbon 50600 mg/kg 1850 1 11/16/19 12:45 7440-44-0 Total Organic Carbon 52200 mg/kg 1850 1 11/16/19 12:45 7440-44-0 Mean Total Organic Carbon 51400 mg/kg 1850 1 11/16/19 12:45 7440-44-0 Sample: D-1 Triplicate Lab ID: 92453338008 Collected: 11108/1910:15 Received: 11/1211910:45 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units Report Limit OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 6010 MET ICP Analytical Method: EPA 601 OD Preparation Method: EPA 3050E Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium ^hromium obalt opper Lead Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Vanadium Zinc 7471 Mercury Mercury Percent Moisture Percent Moisture Total Organic Carbon Total Organic Carbon Total Organic Carbon Total Organic Carbon Total Organic Carbon Mean Total Organic Carbon Date: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM NO mg/kg 1.1 16.9 mg/kg 2.2 42.2 mg/kg 1.1 1.1 mg/kg 0.22 0.40 mg/kg 0.22 42.0 mg/kg 1.1 8.5 mg/kg 1.1 16.5 mg/kg 1.1 21.6 mg/kg 1.1 13.4 mg/kg 1.1 NO mg/kg 2.2 NO mg/kg 1.1 ND mg/kg 2.2 65.0 mg/kg 1.1 88.7 mg/kg 2.2 Analytical Method: EPA7471B Preparation Metho 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:39 7440-36-0 BC 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:39 7440-38-2 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:39 7440-39-3 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:39 7440-41-7 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:39 7440-43-9 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:39 7440-47-3 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:39 7440-48-4 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:39 7440-50-8 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:39 7439-92-1 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:39 7440-02-0 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:39 7782-49-2 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:39 7440-22-4 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:39 7440-28-0 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:39 7440-62-2 11/15/19 11:27 11/17/19 22:39 7440-66-6 is EPA 7471 B 0.13 mg/kg 0.0079 1 11/15/1910:48 11/1911914:43 7439-97-6 Analytical Method: ASTM D2974-87 66.0 % Analytical Method: EPA 9060A 50500 mg/kg 50200 mg/kg 49700 mg/kg 51000 mg/kg 50300 mg/kg 0.10 1 11/13/19 17:11 1770 1 11/16/19 12:54 7440-44-0 1770 1 11/16/19 12:54 7440-44-0 1770 1 11/16/19 12:54 7440-44-0 1770 1 11/16/19 12:54 7440-44-0 1770 1 11/16/19 12:54 744044-0 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, U.C. Page 23 of 52 aceAnalytical www.pacelabs.com QUAILITY CONTROL DATA Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 Pace Project No.: 92453338 QC Balch: 510067 Analysis Method: 9071E QC Batch Method: 9071B Analysis Description: 9071 Oil and Grease Associated Lab Samples: 92453338001, 92453338002, 92453338003, 92453338004, 92453338005 METHOD BLANK: 2737032 Matrix: Solid Associated Lab Samples: 92453338001, 92453338002, 92453338003, 92453338004, 92453338005 Blank Reporting Parameter Units R sult Limit Analyzed Qualifiers Oil and Grease mg/kg ND 69.5 11/18/19 10:33 N2 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 2737033 SpikD LIDS LCS %Rec Parameter Units Conc. Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers Oil and Grease mg/kg 1 10 1310 100 78-114 N2 MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE: 2737034 924 2243001 Spike MS MS %Rec Parameter Units Result Conc. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers !il and Grease mg/kg 1230 1530 2490 83 78-114 N2 MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE: 2737036 924 3338001 Spike MS MS % Rec Parameter Units Result Conc. Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers Oil and Grease mg/kg NO 4060 3570 83 78-114 N2 „ Results presented on this page are In the units Indicated by the'Units" column except where an alternate unit Ispresented to the right or the result. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This repo shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM without the wriff n consent of Pace Analytical Services, U.C. Page 24 of 5: aceAnalXkal e www.pacelabs.com QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 QC Balch: 509289 Analysis Method: MADEP VPH QC Batch Method: MADEP VPH Analysis Description: VPH NC Soil Associated Lab Samples: 92453338001, 92453338002, 92453338003, 92453338004, 92453338005 METHOD BLANK: 2733199 Matrix: Solid Associated Lab Samples: 92453338001, 92453338002, 92453i338003, 92453338004, 92453338005 Blank Reporting Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers Aliphatic (CO5-008) mg/kg ND 2.5 11/13/19 14:58 N2 Aliphatic(C09-C12) mg/kg ND 2.5 11/13/19 14:58 N2 Aromatic (C09-C10) mg/kg NO 2.5 11/13/19 14:58 N2 4-Bromofluorobenzene (FID) (S) e/ 93 70-130 11/13/19 14:58 4-Bromofluorobenzene (PID) (S) % 94 70-130 11/13/19 14:58 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE & LCSD: 2733200 Parameter Units Aliphatic (C05-008) mg/kg Aliphatic (C09-C12) mg/kg _ Aromatic (C09-C10) mg/kg ' ,;-Bromofluorobenzene (FID) (S) % -Bromofluorobenzene (PID) (S) % 2733201 LCS LCSD LCS LCSD % Rao Result Result % Rao % Rec Limits 1.9 13.5 13.6 91 91 70-130 1.9 14.9 15.1 100 101 30-130 5 5.0 5.0 100 100 70-130 97 100 70-130 97 100 70-130 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 Max RPD RPD Qualifiers 0 25 N2 1 25 N2 0 25 N2 Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the 'Units' column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except In full, Date: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, U.C. Page 25 of 52 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 aceAnalXical Huntersville, NC 28078 www.pacelobs.com (704)875-9092 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 QC Balch: 509724 Analysis Method: EPA 7471B QC Balch Method: EPA 7471B Analysis Description: 7471 Mercury Associated Lab Samples: 92453338001, 92453338002, 92453338003, 92453338004, 92453338095, 92453338007, 92453338008 METHOD BLANK: 2735482 Matrix: Solid Associated Lab Samples: 92453338001, 92453338002, 92453338003, 92453338004, 92453338005, 92453338007, 92453338008 Blank Reporting Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers Mercury mg/kg I ND 0.0060 11/19/1914:14 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 2735483 Spike LCS LCS % Rec Parameter Units Conc. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers Mercury mg/kg 0�083 0.081 97 80-120 MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 2735484 1 2735485 MS MSD 92453338001 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD %Rec Parameter Units Result Conc Conc. Result Result % Rao % Rae Limits RPD Qua[ ''Aercury mg/kg 0.090 014 0.16 0.28 0.32 139 145 75-125 11 M1 - - Results presented on this page am In the units Indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the result REPORT bF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Dale: 11/20/201912:24 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,LLC. Page 26 of 52 aceAnalytical e lum.pacelabs.com QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Hunlersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 QC Balch: 509739 Analysis Method: EPA 601 OD QC Batch Method: EPA 3050B Analysis Description: 6010 MET Associated Lab Samples: 92453338001, 92453338002, 92453,338003, 92453338004, 92453338005, 92453338007, 92453338008 METHOD BLANK: 2735572 Associated Lab Samples: 92453338001, 92453338002, Parameter Units Antimony mg/kg Arsenic mg/kg Barium mg/kg Beryllium mg/kg Cadmium mg/kg Chromium mg/kg Cobalt mg/kg Copper mg/kg Lead mg/kg Nickel mg/kg Selenium mg/kg Silver mg/kg Thallium mg/kg :'anadium mg/kg ?Inc mg/kg Matrix: Solid 8003,92453338004,92453338005,92453338007,92453338008 ik Reporting A Limit Analyzed Qualifiers ND 0.50 11/18/19 22:26 BC NO 1.0 11/17/19 21:59 NO 0.50 11/17/19 21:59 NO 0.10 11/17/19 21:59 NO 0.10 11/17/19 21:59 NO 0.50 11/17/19 21:59 NO 0.50 11/17/19 21:59 NO 0.50 11/17/19 21:59 NO 0.50 11/17/19 21:59 NO 0.50 11/17/19 21:59 NO 1.0 11/17/19 21:59 NO 0.50 11/17/19 21:59 NO 1.0 11/18/19 22:26 NO 0.50 11/17/19 21:59 NO 1.0 11/1711921:59 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: Parameter 2735573 Units Spi Con a LCS Result LCS %Rec % Rae Limits Antimony mg/kg 50 47.7 95 80-120 Arsenic mg/kg 50 47.4 95 80-120 Barium mg/kg 50 50.7 101 80-120 Beryllium mg/kg i 50 50.4 101 80-120 Cadmium mg/kg 50 47.9 96 80-120 Chromium mg/kg 50 50.1 100 80-120 Cobalt mg/kg i 50 50.0 100 80-120 Copper mg/kg 50 49.8 100 80-120 Lead mg/kg 50 48.7 97 80-120 Nickel mg/kg 50 49.4 99 80-120 Selenium mg/kg 50 42.4 85 80-120 Silver mg/kg 25 24.1 96 80-120 Thallium mg/kg 50 48.0 96 80-120 Vanadium mg/kg 5o 50.4 101 80-120 Zinc mg/kg 50 47.8 96 80-120 Qualifiers Results presented on this page are In the units Indicated by the "units" column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the result. Date: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, -I-C. Page 27 of 52 Pace Analytical Services, LLC aceAnalXical a 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078078 www.Ixfcehibs.com (704)875-9092 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 2735574 2735575 MS MSD 92453338001 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD %Rec Parameter Units Result Conc. Conc. Result Result % Rao % Rec Limits RPD Qual Antimony mg/kg ND 1�35 126 31.3 32.0 23 25 75-125 2 M1 Arsenic mg/kg 15.4 1�35 126 133 125 88 87 75-125 7 Barium mg/kg 33.9 135 126 173 156 103 97 75-125 11 Beryllium mg/kg 1.2 135 126 127 117 93 92 75-125 8 Cadmium mg/kg 0.35 1�35 126 121 113 90 89 75-125 7 Chromium mg/kg 40.8 1135 126 175 160 99 95 75-125 9 Cobalt mg/kg 9.2 135 126 132 123 91 90 75-125 7 Copper mg/kg 16.4 1�35 126 150 139 99 97 75-125 8 Lead mg/kg 20.2 135 126 139 129 88 87 75-125 7 Nickel mg/kg 12.9 135 126 136 126 92 90 75-125 8 Selenium mg/kg ND 1 5 126 109 101 79 78 75-125 8 Silver mg/kg ND 6 3 63 61.5 56.9 91 90 75-125 8 Thallium mg/kg ND 135 126 117 108 86 86 75-125 8 Vanadium mg/kg 61.8 135 126 200 183 103 96 75-125 9 Zinc mg/kg 84.5 1,35 126 209 194 92 87 75-125 8 Results presented on this page are In the units Indicated le the 'Units' column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the result. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This repo shall not be reproduced, except In full, Date: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, I.I.C. Page 28 of 52 aceAnalytical www.pacelebs.com QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 QC Batch: 509600 Analysis Method: EPA 8260D QC Batch Method: EPA 5035A Analysis Description: 8260D MSV 5035A Volatile Organics Associated Lab Samples: 92453338001 I METHOD BLANK: 2734822 Associated Lab Samples: 92453338001 Parameter Units 1,1,1,2-Tetmchloroethane ug/kg 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/kg 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/kg 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/kg 1,1-Dichloroelhane ug/kg 1,1-Dichloroethene ug/kg 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ug/kg 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg 1,2-Dichloroelhane ug/kg 1,2-Dichloropropane ug/kg 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg 2-Butanone (MEK) ug/kg 2-Hexanone ug/kg -Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) ug/kg ,ketone ug/kg =lcrylonitrile ug/kg Benzene ug/kg Bromochloromethane ug/kg Bromodichloromethane ug/kg Bromoform ug/kg Bromomethane ug/kg Carbon disulfide ug/kg Carbon tetrachloride ug/kg Chlorobenzene ug/kg Chloroethane ug/kg Chloroform ug/kg Chloromethane ug/kg cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/kg cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/kg Dibromochloromethane ug/kg Dibromomethane ug/kg Ethylbenzene ug/kg lodomethane ug/kg Methylene Chloride ug/kg Styrene ug/kg Tetrachloroethene ug/kg Toluene ug/kg trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/kg trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/kg trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-bulene ug/kg Trichloroethene ug/kg Matrix: Solid Reporting Limit Analyzed NO 5.0 11/14/19 09:58 ND 5.0 11/14/19 09:58 NO 5.0 11/14/19 09:58 NO 5.0 11/14/19 09:58 NO 5.0 11/14/19 09:58 NO 5.0 11/14/19 09:58 ND 5.0 11/14/19 09:58 NO 5.0 11/14/19 09:58 NO 5.0 11/14/19 09:58 NO 5.0 11/14/19 09:58 NO 5.0 11/14/19 09:58 NO 100 11/14/19 09:58 NO 50.0 11/14/19 09:58 NO 50.0 11/14/19 09:58 NO 100 11/14/19 09:58 NO 100 11/14/19 09:58 NO 5.0 11/14/19 09:58 NO 5.0 11/14/19 09:58 NO 5.0 11114/1909:58 NO 5.0 11/14/19 09:58 NO 10.0 11/14/19 09:58 ND 10.0 11/14/19 09:58 NO 5.0 11/14/19 09:58 NO 5.0 11/14/19 09:58 NO 10.0 11/14/19 09:58 ND 5.0 11/14/19 09:58 NO 10.0 11/14/19 09:58 NO 5.0 11/14/19 09:58 NO 5.0 11/14/19 09:58 NO 5.0 11/14/19 09:58 NO 5.0 11/14/19 09:58 NO 5.0 11/14/19 09:58 ND 10.0 11/14/19 09:58 NO 20.0 11/14/19 09:58 NO 5.0 11/14/19 09:58 NO 5.0 11/14/19 09:58 NO 5.0 11/14/19 09:58 NO 5.0 11/14/19 09:58 NO 5.0 11/14/19 09:58 NO 5.0 11/14/19 09:58 NO 5.0 11114/1909:58 Qualifiers Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 Results presented on this page are in the units Indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the result REPORT F LABORATORY ANALYSIS This repo shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, L-C. Page 29 of 52 aceAnalXical www.pacelabs.com QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 i METHOD BLANK: 2734822 Matrix: Solid Associated Lab Samples: 92453338001 Blank Reporting Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Trichlorofluoromethane ug/kg ND 5.0 11/14/1909:58 Vinyl acetate ug/kg ND 50.0 11/14/1909:58 Vinyl chloride ug/kg ND 10.0 11/14/19 09:58 Xylene (Total) ug/kg ND 10.0 11/14/19 09:58 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) % 78 70-132 11/14/19 09:58 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) % 95 70-130 11/14/19 09:58 Toluene-d8 (S) % 102 70-130 11/14/19 09:58 Qualifiers LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: Parameter 2734823 Units Spi Con a . LCS Result 1-CS % Rao % Rec Limits 1,1,1,2-Tetmchloroethane ug/kg 50 46.7 93 70-130 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/kg 50 47.7 95 70-130 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroelhane ug/kg 50 44.1 88 55-130 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/kg 50 47.3 95 70-130 _ 1,1-Dichloroethane ug/kg 50 46.1 92 68-130 „ 1-Dichloroethene ug/kg 50 50.0 100 70-130 2,3-Trichloropropane ug/kg 50 46.2 92 70-130 - i,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg 50 46.4 93 70-130 1,2-Dichloroethane ug/kg 50 44.2 88 70-130 1,2-Dichloropropane ug/kg 50 47.8 96 70-130 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg 50 45.8 92 70-130 2-Butanone(MEK) ug/kg 00 89.11 89 60-130 2-Hexanone ug/kg 00 87.9 88 70-132 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIRK) ug/kg 00 81.2 81 69-130 Acetone ug/kg 00 851 85 49-148 Acrylonitdle ug/kg 50 225 90 56-153 Benzene ug/kg 50 48.2 96 70-130 Bromochloromethane ug/kg 50 50.2 100 70-130 Bromodichloromethane ug/kg 50 46.5 93 70-130 Bromoform ug/kg 50 49.9 100 68-136 Bromomethane ug/kg 50 47.0 94 60-140 Carbon disulfide ug/kg 50 49.9 100 70-130 Carbon tetrachloride ug/kg 50 59.5 119 70-130 Chlorobenzene ug/kg 50 47.9 96 70-130 Chloroethane ug/kg 50 51.5 103 51-147 Chloroform ug/kg 50 41.7 83 70-130 Chloromelhane ug/kg 50 47.4 95 48-130 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/kg 50 47.1 94 70-130 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/kg 50 49.0 98 70-130 Dibromochloromethane ug/kg 50 39.7 79 70-130 Dibromomethane ug/kg 50 44.5 89 70-130 Ethylbenzene ug/kg 50 45.4 91 70-130 lodomethane ug/kg i.00 113 113 69-144 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 Qualifiers Results presented on this page are in the units Indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the result. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report) shall not be reproduced, except in full, Dale: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, U.C. Page 30 of 52 aceAnalj6cal e wwwgacalabs.corn QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 2734823 Spike LCS LIDS % Rec Parameter Units Coric. Result %Rec Limits Methylene Chloride ug/kg 50 45.5 91 50-137 Styrene ug/kg 50 45.7 91 70-130 Tetrachloroethene ug/kg 50 48.4 97 56-130 Toluene ug/kg 50 45.7 91 70-130 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/kg 50 47.5 95 70-130 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/kg 50 45.6 91 70-130 trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-bulene ug/kg 50 54.7 109 70-130 Trichloroethene ug/kg 50 51.6 103 70-141 Trichlorolluoromelhane ug/kg 50 48.2 96 67-130 Vinyl acetate ug/kg 100 83.6 84 10-136 Vinyl chloride ug/kg 50 54.2 108 67-130 Xylene (Total) ug/kg 150 140 94 70-130 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) % 95 70-132 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) a/ 99 70-130 Toluene-d8 (S) % 93 70-130 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Hunlersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 Qualifiers MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE Parameter DUPLICATE: 2734824 MS 92453338001 SpIlk Units Result Concl MSD Spike Conc. 2734825 MS Result MSD Result MS %Rec MSD %Rec % Rec Limits RPD Qual 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/kg ND 2030 2090 1820 1710 87 82 52-133 6 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/kg ND 2030 2090 1890 1750 90 84 49-137 7 1,1,2,2-Tetmchloroethane ug/kg ND 20 0 2090 1960 1910 94 91 39-150 3 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/kg ND 20 0 2090 2020 1830 97 88 48-140 10 1,1-Dichloroethane ug/kg ND 20 0 2090 2150 2260 103 108 46-135 5 1,1-Dichloroelhene ug/kg NO 20 0 2090 2030 1940 97 93 38-149 4 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ug/kg NO 20 0 2090 2000 1910 96 91 33-157 5 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg NO 20 0 2090 2170 1980 104 95 27-146 10 1,2-Dichloroethane ug/kg NO 2030 2090 2030 1980 97 95 49-140 3 1,2-Dichloropropane ug/kg ND 2030 2090 2110 2010 101 96 44-143 5 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg ND 2030 2090 1940 1930 93 92 35-139 1 2-Butanone (MEK) ug/kg ND 4130 4180 4020J 4460J 96 107 10-181 2-Hexanone ug/kg ND 4130 4180 3490J 3410J 84 82 18-169 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) ug/kg ND 4130 4180 4030J 3830J 96 92 16-175 Acetone ug/kg ND 4130 4180 4530J 4640J 93 95 10-200 Acrylonilrile ug/kg ND 105 0 10500 NO 9760J 100 93 70-130 Benzene ug/kg NO 2090 2090 2120 1690 101 81 46-136 23 Bromochloromethane ug/kg NO 2090 2090 2240 2200 107 105 44-142 2 Bromodichloromethane ug/kg NO 2090 2090 1910 1800 91 86 41-140 6 Bromoform ug/kg NO 2090 2090 1630 1530 78 73 34-145 7 Bromomethane ug/kg NO 2090 2090 2180 1920 104 92 14-162 13 Carbon disulfide ug/kg NO 2090 2090 2470 2160 113 98 10-179 14 Carbon tetrachloride ug/kg ND 2090 2090 1680 1740 81 83 44-141 4 Chlorobenzene ug/kg ND 2090 2090 2030 1950 97 94 39-141 4 Chloroethane ug/kg ND 2090 2090 1450 1370 69 66 10-182 5 Results presented on this page are In the units Indicated Is y the 'Units' column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right or the result. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This repo shall not be reproduced, except in full, Dale: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, U.C. Page 31 of 52 aceAnaljftal e www.pacelebs.com QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 MATRIX SPIKE 8 MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 2734824 2734825 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 MS MSD 92453338001 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD % Rec Parameter Units Result Conc. Conc. Result Result %Rec %Rec Limits RPD Qual Chloroform ug/kg ND 2090 2090 1700 1660 81 80 45-140 Chloromethane ug/kg ND 2090 2090 2270 2050 109 98 19-149 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/kg ND 2090 2090 2150 2230 103 107 38-150 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/kg ND 2090 2090 2040 1800 98 86 30-144 Dibromochloromethane ug/kg NO 2090 2090 1600 1610 76 77 36-145 Dibromomelhane ug/kg ND 2090 2090 2350 2100 112 101 41-145 Ethylbenzene ug/kg NO 2090 2090 1950 1850 93 89 35-144 lodomethane ug/kg NO 4180 4180 5700 5890 136 141 70-130 Methylene Chloride ug/kg NO 2090 2090 2340 2360 112 113 10-174 Styrene ug/kg NO 20PO 2090 2050 1960 98 94 15-152 Tetrachloroethene ug/kg NO 2090 2090 1800 1830 86 88 19-141 Toluene ug/kg NO 2090 2090 2130 2100 102 100 31-146 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/kg NO 20a0 2090 2290 2110 110 101 28-157 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/kg ND 2000 2090 1870 1740 89 83 25-146 trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-bulene ug/kg ND 20� 0 2090 2310 2310 111 110 70-130 Trichloroethene ug/kg ND 2030 2090 2130 1650 102 79 34-149 Trichlorofluoromethane ug/kg ND 2030 2090 1090 1080 52 52 10-167 Vinyl acetate ug/kg ND 4130 4180 3710J 3680J 89 88 10-200 Vinyl chloride ug/kg NO 2030 2090 2600 2220 124 106 36-155 :(ylene (Total) ug/kg NO 6270 6270 6060 5530 97 88 29-148 ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) % 95 105 70-132 4-Bromofluarobenzone (S) % 102 98 70-130 Toluene-d8(S) % 106 106 70-130 Results presented on this page are In the units Indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the result REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This repot: shall not be reproduced, except in full, Dale: 11/20/201912:24 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,LLC. 2 10 4 13 0 11 5 3 M1 1 5 2 2 8 7 0 25 1 16 9 Page 32 of 52 aceAnalytical www.paeetabs.csm QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 QC Balch: 509746 Analysis Method: EPA 8260D QC Balch Method: EPA 5035A Analysis Description: 8260D MSV 5035A Volatile Organics Associated Lab Samples: 92453338002, 92453338003, 92453338004, 92453338005 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 METHOD BLANK: 2735631 1 Matrix: Solid Associated Lab Samples: 92453338002, 92453338003, 92453338004, 92453338005 Blank Repotting Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers 1, 1, 1,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/kg ND 5.0 11/1511910:37 1, 1, 1 -Trich loroetha ne ug/kg ND 5.0 11/15/19 10:37 1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/kg ND 5.0 11/15/19 10:37 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/kg ND 5.0 11/15/19 10:37 1,1-Dichloroethane ug/kg ND 5.0 11/15/19 10:37 1,1-Dichloroethene ug/kg ND 5.0 11/1511910:37 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ug/kg ND 5.0 11/15/19 10:37 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg ND 5.0 11/15/19 10:37 1,2-Dichloroethane ug/kg ND 5.0 11/15/19 10:37 1,2-Dichloropropane ug/kg NO 5.0 11/15/19 10:37 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg ND 5.0 11/15/19 10:37 2-Butanone (MEK) ug/kg NO 100 11/15/19 10:37 ` 2-Hexanone ug/kg ND 50.0 1111511910:37 ' -Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) ug/kg NO 50.0 11/1511910:37 dcelone ug/kg ND 100 11/15/19 10:37 crylonitrile ug/kg NO 100 11/15/19 10:37 Benzene ug/kg ND 5.0 11/15/19 10:37 Bromochloromelhane ug/kg ND 5.0 11/15/19 10:37 Bromodichloromethane ug/kg NO 5.0 11115/1910:37 Bromoform ug/kg NO 5.0 11/15/19 10:37 Bromomethane ug/kg NO 10.0 11/15/19 10:37 Carbon disulfide ug/kg NO 10.0 11/15/19 10:37 Carbon tetrachloride ug/kg NO 5.0 11/15/19 10:37 v1 Chlorobenzene ug/kg NO 5.0 11/15/19 10:37 Chloroethane ug/kg NO 10.0 11/15/19 10:37 Chloroform ug/kg NO 5.0 11/15/19 10:37 Chloromethane ug/kg ND 10.0 11/15/19 10:37 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/kg NO 5.0 11/15/19 10:37 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 'ug/kg NO 5.0 11/15/19 10:37 Dibromochloromethane ug/kg NO 5.0 11/15/19 10:37 Dibromomethane ug/kg NO 5.0 11115/1910:37 Ethylbenzene ug/kg NO 5.0 11/15/19 10:37 lodomethane ug/kg NO 10.0 11/15/19 10:37 v1 Methylene Chloride ug/kg NO 20.0 11/16/19 10:37 Styrene ug/kg ND 5.0 11/15/19 10:37 Tetrachlooethene ug/kg ND 5.0 11/15/19 10:37 Toluene ug/kg ND 5.0 11/15/19 10:37 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/kg NO 5.0 11/15/19 10:37 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/kg NO 5.0 11/15/19 10:37 trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene ug/kg NO 5.0 11/15/19 10:37 Trichloroelhene ug/kg NO 5.0 11/15/19 10:37 - Results presented on this page are In the units Indicated b the "Units" column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the result REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Page 33 of 52 aceAnalXical e www.pacelabs.cam QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 METHOD BLANK: 2735631 Matrix: Solid Associated Lab Samples: 92453338002, 92453338003, 92453338004, 92453338005 Blank Reporting Parameter Units Result Limit Trichlorolluoromethane ug/kg Vinyl acetate ug/kg Vinyl chloride ug/kg Xylene (Total) ug/kg 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) % 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) % Toluene-d8(S) % NO 5.0 NO 50.0 NO 10.0 NO 10.0 75 70-132 95 70-130 116 70-130 Analyzed 11/15/19 10:37 11/15/19 10:37 11/15/19 10:37 vi 11/15/19 10:37 11/15/19 10:37 11/15/19 10:37 11/15/19 10:37 Qualifiers Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: Parameter 2735632 Units Spike Conc. LCS Result LCS %Rec %Rec Limits Qualifiers 1, 1, 1,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/kg 50 47.5 95 70-130 1, 1, 1 -Trichloroethane ug/kg 50 59.7 119 70-130 1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/kg 50 44.6 89 55-130 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/kg 50 51.2 102 70-130 1,1-Dichloroethane ug/kg 50 51.8 104 68-130 " 1 -Dichloroethene ug/kg 50 56.7 113 70-130 :,2,3-Trichloropropana ug/kg 50 47.8 96 70-130 .,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg 50 46.9 94 70-130 1,2-Dichloroethane ug/kg 50 47.5 95 70-130 1,2-Dichloropropane ug/kg 50 51.7 103 70-130 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg 50 49.0 98 70-130 2-Butanone (MEK) ug/kg 100 105 105 60-130 2-Hexanone ug/kg 100 92.6 93 70-132 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) ug/kg �100 92.5 93 69-130 Acetone ug/kg 100 104 104 49-148 Acrylanitrile ug/kg 250 246 98 56-153 Benzene ug/kg 50 55.7 111 70-130 Bromochloromethane ug/kg 50 54.7 109 70-130 Bromodichloromelhane ug/kg 50 49.6 99 70-130 Bromoform ug/kg 50 45.8 92 68-136 Bromomethane ug/kg 50 50.2 100 60-140 Carbon disulfide ug/kg 50 58.7 117 70-130 Carbon tetrachloride ug/kg 50 62.2 124 70-130 vl Chlorobenzene ug/kg 50 50.6 101 70-130 Chloroethane ug/kg 50 55.0 110 51-147 Chloroform ug/kg 50 43.5 87 70-130 Chloromethane ug/kg 50 51.4 103 48-130 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/kg 50 55.7 111 70-130 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/kg 50 52.6 105 70-130 Dibromochloromethane ug/kg 50 41.0 82 70-130 Dibromomethane ug/kg 50 49.2 98 70-130 Ethylbenzene ug/kg 50 47.7 95 70.130 lodomelhane ug/kg 100 138 138 69-144 vl Results presented on this page are in the units Indicated by the "Units' column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the result. REPORT �F LABORATORY ANALYSIS This repo shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM without the writttin consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Page 34 of 52 aceAnalytical e www.pacelabs.com QUALITY CONTROL DATA Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 2735632 Spike LCS LCS % Rec Parameter Units Conc. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers Methylene Chloride ug/kg 50 48.9 98 50-137 Styrene ug/kg 50 47.6 95 70-130 Tetrachloroethene ug/kg 50 56.6 113 56-130 Toluene ug/kg 50 50.1 100 70-130 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/kg 50 52.4 105 70-130 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/kg 50 46.7 93 70-130 trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-bulene ug/kg 50 56.8 114 70-130 Trichleroethene ug/kg 50 56.8 114 70-141 Trichlorofluoromethane ug/kg 50 56.1 112 67-130 Vinyl acetate ug/kg 100 85.6 86 10-136 Vinyl chloride ug/kg 50 61.8 124 67-130 v1 Xylene (Total) ug/kg 150 148 99 70-130 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) % 99 70-132 4-Bromofluorobenzene(S) % 93 70-130 Toluene-dB(S) % 95 70-130 MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE: Parameter 2735634 Units 924f53338003 Result Spike MS Conc. Result MS % Rao %Rec Limits Qualifiers _ 'I,1,1,2-Tetrachloroelhane ug/kg NO 63 59.0 94 52-133 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/kg ND 63 74.9 119 49-137 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/kg NO 63 51.8 82 39-150 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/kg ND 63 54.2 86 48-140 1,1-Dichloroethane ug/kg ND 63 71.0 113 46-135 1,1-Dichloroethene ug/kg ND 63 82.1 130 38-149 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ug/kg ND 63 52.9 84 33-157 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg ND 63 67.7 108 27-146 1,2-Dichloroethane ug/kg ND 63 50.9 81 49-140 1,2-Dichloropropane ug/kg ND 63 66.2 105 44-143 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg ND 63 73.0 116 35-139 2-Butanone (MEK) ug/kg NO 126 117J 32 10-181 2-Hexanone ug/kg NO 126 102J 81 18-169 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) ug/kg NO 126 1081 86 16-175 Acetone ug/kg 354 126 367 10 10-200 Acrylonilrile ug/kg NO 315 275J 87 70-130 Benzene ug/kg NO 63 73.4 117 46-136 Bromochloromethane ug/kg NO 63 61.3 97 44-142 Bromodichloromethane ug/kg NO 63 56.3 89 41-140 Bromoform ug/kg NO 63 48.0 76 34-145 Bromomethane ug/kg ND 63 65.0 103 14-162 Carbon disulfide ug/kg NO 63 83.9 116 10-179 Carbon tetrachloride ug/kg ND 63 69.7 111 44-141 Chlorobenzene ug/kg ND 63 72.7 115 39-141 Chloroelhane ug/kg ND 63 82.3 131 10-182 Chloroform ug/kg ND 63 53.7 85 45-140 - Results presented on this page are In the units Indicated by the 'Units' column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the resulL REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS I This repol shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Page 35 of 52 I aceAnalj&al e wWW.facalabs.com Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE: 2735634 Parameter Units Chloromethane ug/kg cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/kg cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/kg Dibromochloromelhane ug/kg Dibromomethane ug/kg Ethylbenzene ug/kg lodomethane ug/kg Methylene Chloride ug/kg Styrene ug/kg Tetmchloroethene ug/kg Toluene ug/kg trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/kg trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/kg trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene ug/kg Trichloroelhene ug/kg Trichlorofluoromethane ug/kg Vinyl acetate ug/kg Vinyl chloride ug/kg Xylene (Total) ug/kg 5:,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) % -Bromofluorobenzene (S) Toluene-d8 (S) % SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 2735633 Parameter Units 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/kg 1,1,1-Trichooroethane ug/kg 1,1,2,2-Telrachloroethane ug/kg 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/kg 1,1-Dichloroethane ug/kg 1,1-Dichloroethene ug/kg 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ug/kg 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg 1,2-Dichloroethane ug/kg 1,2-Dichloropropane ug/kg 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg 2-Butanone (MEK) ug/kg 2-Hexanone ug/kg 4-Methyl-2-penlanone (MIBK) ug/kg Acetone ug/kg Acrylonitdle ug/kg Benzene ug/kg Bromochloromethane ug/kg Bromodichloromethane ug/kg QUALITY CONTROL DATA 92453338003 Spike MS Result Conc. Result ND 63 73.0 ND 63 68.9 ND 63 54.8 ND 63 52.8 NO 63 56.0 NO 63 79.8 NO 126 163 NO 63 85.8 NO 63 68.0 NO 63 83.4 NO 63 76.7 NO 63 80.0 NO 63 47.6 NO 63 42.6 NO 63 72.5 NO 63 99.7 NO 126 61.1J NO 63 93.6 NO 189 241 ND NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO Dup Result ND ND ND ND ND ND ND .ND NO NO NO 43.1 J NO NO 196J NO NO NO NO Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9B00 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 MS %Rec % Rec Limits Qualifiers 116 19-149 • 109 38-150 87 30-144 84 36-145 89 41-145 127 35-144 129 70-130 136 10-174 108 15-152 132 19-141 122 31-146 127 28-157 76 25-146 68 70-130 M1 115 34-149 158 10-167 48 10-200 149 36-155 128 29-148 87 70-132 97 70-130 102 70-130 RPD Qualifiers Results presented on this page are In the units Indicated bl� the'Unlis" column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the result. Date: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, L-C. Page 36 of 52 aceftljftal e www.pacelaba.com QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 2735633 Parameter Units 92453338002 Result Dup Result RPD Qualifiers Bromoform ug/kg NO NO Bromomethane ug/kg NO NO Carbon disulfide ug/kg NO 18.6J Carbon tetrachloride ug/kg NO NO v1 Chlorobenzene ug/kg NO NO Chloroethane ug/kg NO NO Chloroform ug/kg NO NO Chloromethane ug/kg NO NO cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/kg NO NO cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/kg NO NO Dibromochloromethane ug/kg NO NO Dibromomethane ug/kg NO NO Ethylbenzene ug/kg NO NO lodomethane ug/kg NO NO v1 Methylene Chloride ug/kg NO NO Styrene ug/kg NO NO Tetrachloroethene ug/kg NO NO Toluene ug/kg NO NO trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/kg NO NO Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/kg NO NO Tans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene ug/kg NO NO frichloroelhene ug/kg NO NO Trichlorofluoromelhane ug/kg NO NO Vinyl acetate ug/kg NO NO Vinyl chloride ug/kg NO NO v1 Xylene (Total) ug/kg NO NO 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) % 79 81 4-Bromofluombenzene (S) % 95 96 Toluene-d8 (S) % 107 104 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Hunlersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 Results presented on this page are In the unite Indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the result. REPORT pF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This repo shall not be reproduced, except In full, Date: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM without the writI n consent of Pace Analytical Services, U.C. Page 37 of 52 aceAnalXical e wam.pacelass.com QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 QC Balch: 510174 Analysis Method: EPA 8081B QC Balch Method: EPA 3546 An Description: 8081 GCS Pesticides Associated Lab Samples: 92453338001, 92453338002, 92453338003, 92453338004, 92453338005 METHOD BLANK: 2737582 Associated Lab Samples: 92453338001, 92453338002, 92453338003, Blank Parameter Units Result I Matrix: Solid 92453338004, 92453338005 Reporting Limit Analyzed 4,4'-DDD ug/kg NO 2.0 11/1911912:36 4,4'-DDE ug/kg NO 2.0 11/19/19 12:36 4,4'-DDT ug/kg NO 2.0 11/19/19 12:36 Alddn ug/kg NO 2.0 11/19/19 12:36 alpha-BHC ug/kg NO 2.0 11/19/19 12:36 beta-BHC ug/kg NO 2.0 11/19/19 12:36 Chlordane (Technical) ug/kg NO 6.9 11/19/19 12:36 delta-BHC ug/kg NO 2.0 11/19/19 12:36 Dielddn ug/kg NO 2.0 11/19/19 12:36 Endosulfan I ug/kg NO 2.0 11/19/19 12:36 Endosulfan II ug/kg NO 2.0 11/19/19 12:36 Endosulfan sulfate ug/kg NO 2.0 11/19/19 12:36 Endrin ug/kg NO 2.0 11/19/1912,36 -- 7ndrin aldehyde ug/kg ND 2.0 11/19/19 12:36 :ndrin ketone ug/kg NO 2.0 11/19/19 12:36 ;gamma-BHC (Lindane) ug/kg NO 2.0 11/19/19 12:36 Heptachlor ug/kg NO 2.0 11/19/19 12:36 Heptachlor epoxide ug/kg NO 2.0 11/19/19 12:36 Hexachlorobenzene ug/kg ND 2.0 11/19/19 12:36 Methaxychlor ug/kg NO 5.0 11/19/19 12:36 Mirex ug/kg NO 5.0 11/19/19 12:36 Toxaphene ug/kg NO 6.9 11/19/19 12:36 Decachlorobiphenyl (S) % 100 10-130 11/19/19 12:36 Tetrachloro-m-xylene (S) % 95 15-130 11/19/19 12:36 Qualifiers Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 2737583 Spi a LCS LIDS %Rec Parameter Units Cone. Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers 4,4'-DDD ug/kg 8.3 9.0 109 65-130 4,4'-DDE ug/kg 8.3 8.8 107 62-130 4,4'-DDT ug/kg 8.3 9.2 112 46-130 Aldrin ug/kg 8.3 8.9 107 46-130 alpha-BHC ug/kg 8.3 8.9 108 41-130 beta-BHC ug/kg 8.3 9.5 115 45-130 delta-BHC ug/kg 8.3 8.5 103 59-130 Dieldrin ug/kg 8.3 8.9 107 59-130 EndosulfanI ug/kg 18.3 9.1 110 60-130 Endosulfan ll ug/kg 18.3 8.7 105 64-130 Endosulfan sulfate ug/kg 18.3 8.7 105 67-130 Endrin ug/kg 8.3 9.4 114 62-130 Results presented on this page are in the units Indicated by the 'Units' column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the result. Date: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Page 38 of 52 aceAnalj&al www.pacelebs.cors QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 2737583 Spike LIDS LCS %Rec Parameter Units Conc. Result % Rec Limits Endrin aldehyde ug/kg 118.3 8.3 100 52-130 Endrin ketone ug/kg 8.3 8.7 105 57-130 gamma-BHC (Lindane) ug/kg 8.3 9.2 111 47-130 Heptachlor ug/kg 8.3 8.6 103 48-130 Heptachlor epoxide ug/kg 8.3 8.6 104 56-130 Hexachlorobenzene ug/kg 8.3 7.8 95 40-130 Methoxychlor ug/kg 4.8 25.2 102 62-130 Mirex ug/kg 24.8 17.6 71 70-130 Decachlorobiphenyl (S) % 110 10-130 Tetrachloro-m-xylene (S) % 103 15-130 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 Qualifiers MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX Parameter SPIKE DUPLICATE: 2737584 MS 92453338001 Spike Units Result Conc, MSD Spike Conc. 2737585 MS Result MSD Result MS %Rec MSD e/ Rec %Rec Limits RPD Qual 4,4'-DDD ug/kg ND 2 .2 25.8 30.1 27.6 119 107 36-130 9 4,4'-DDE ug/kg ND 21J2 25.8 32.5 28.9 129 112 26-131 12 1,4'-DDT ug/kg ND 2q.2 25.8 29.0 26.3 115 102 32-131 10 Aldrin ug/kg ND 2 .2 25.8 42.0 35.2 167 137 28-130 18 M1 tdpha-BHC ug/kg ND 2J.2 25.8 26.8 24.6 106 96 10-123 8 beta-BHC ug/kg ND 2p.2 25.8 35.2 31.2 140 121 25-130 12 Ml delta-BHC ug/kg ND 2 .2 25.8 31.0 28.7 123 112 28-130 8 Dielddn ug/kg ND 2 .2 25.8 32.1 28.5 127 111 29-130 12 EndosulfanI ug/kg ND 2 .2 26.8 34.1 30.5 135 119 31-130 11 M1 Endosulfan ll ug/kg ND 2 .2 25.8 29.9 27.2 119 106 18-141 9 Endosulfan sulfate ug/kg ND 2 .2 25.8 27.5 25.8 109 100 40-130 6 Endrin ug/kg ND 2 .2 25.8 33.2 29.4 132 114 19-147 12 Endrin aldehyde ug/kg ND 2 .2 25.8 27.5 25.6 109 100 25-130 7 Endrin ketone ug/kg ND 2 .2 25.8 27.4 25.8 109 101 27-134 6 gamma-BHC (Lindane) ug/kg ND 2 .2 25.8 29.8 26.9 118 105 30-130 10 Heptachlor ug/kg ND 2JJ.2 25.8 34.9 30.5 139 119 33-130 14 Mt Heptachlor epoxide ug/kg ND 2q.2 25.8 101 74.6 400 290 33-130 30 Mt Hexachlorobenzene ug/kg ND 25.2 25.8 24.3 22.4 96 87 10-147 8 Methoxychlor uglkg NO 7 .6 77.2 77.3 69.3 102 90 26-133 11 Mirex ug/kg NO 7 .6 77.2 55.3 51.9 73 67 26-125 6 Decachlorobiphenyl (S) % 95 95 10-130 Tetrachloro-m-xylene (S) % 86 79 15-130 D3 Results presented on this page are In the units Indicated REPORT This reps Dale: 11/20/201912:24 PM without the writ except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the result. IF LABORATORY ANALYSIS shall not be reproduced, except in full, n consent of Pace Analytical Services, L-C. Page 39 of 52 aceAnalXical www.pacelabs.aort QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 QC Balch: 510140 Analysis Method: EPA 8270E QC Batch Method: EPA 3546 Analysis Description: 8270E Solid MSSV Microwave PAH Associated Lab Samples: 92453338001, 92453338002, 92453338003, 92453338004 METHOD BLANK: 2737434 1 Matrix: Solid Associated Lab Samples: 92453338001, 92453338002, 92453338003, 92453338004 Blank Reporting Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed 1-Melhylnaphthalene ug/kg ND 327 11/1811916:38 2-Melhylnaphthalene ug/kg ND 327 11/18/19 16:38 Acenaphlhene ug/kg ND 327 11/18/19 16:38 Acenaphthylene ug/kg ND 327 11/18/19 16:38 Anthmcene ug/kg ND 327 11/18/19 16:38 Benzo(a)anthracene ug/kg ND 327 11/18/19 16:38 Benzo(a)pyrene ug/kg NO 327 11/18/19 16:38 Benzo(b)fluoranlhene ug/kg ND 327 11/18/19 16:38 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/kg ND 327 11/18/19 16:38 Benzo(k)fluoranlhene ug/kg ND 327 11/18/19 16:38 Chrysene ug/kg ND 327 11/18/19 16:38 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ug/kg ND 327 11/18/19 16:38 Fluoranthene ug/kg ND 327 11/18/19 16:38 ,-luorene ug/kg ND 327 11/18/19 16:38 1odeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ug/kg ND 327 11/18/19 16:38 "laphlhalene ug/kg ND 327 11/18/19 16:38 Phenanthrene ug/kg ND 327 11/18/19 16:38 Pyrene ug/kg ND 327 11/18/19 16:38 2-Fluorobiphenyl(S) % 68 30-110 11/18/19 16:38 Nitrobenzene-d5 (S) % 66 23-110 11/18/19 16:38 Terphenyl-d14 (S) % 71 28-110 11/18/19 16:38 Qualifiers LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: Parameter 2737435 Units Spike Conc. LCS Result LCS % Rec % Rec Limits 1-Methylnaphthalene ug/kg 1680 1160 69 55-130 2-Methylnaphthalene ug/kg 1680 1160 69 54-130 Acenaphlhene ug/kg 1680 1260 75 60-130 Acenaphthylene ug/kg 1680 1330 79 60-130 Anthracene ug/kg 1680 1380 82 63-130 Benzo(a)anlhracene ug/kg 1680 1340 80 59-130 Benzo(a)pyrene ug/kg 1680 1330 80 57-130 Benzo(b)fluoranthene ug/kg 1680 1330 79 54-130 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/kg 1680 1360 81 59-130 Benzo(k)fluoranthene ug/kg 1680 1320 79 54-130 Chrysene ug/kg 1680 1250 75 58-130 Dibenz(a,h)anlhracene ug/kg 1680 1300 77 59-130 Fluoranthene ug/kg 1680 1280 76 65-130 Fluorene ug/kg 1680 1270 75 63-130 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ug/kg 1680 1320 79 60-130 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 Qualifiers Results presented on this page are In the units Indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the result. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Page 40 of 52 t aceAnalj&al www.pacelabs.com Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 2737435 Parameter Units Naphthalene ug/kg Phenanthrene ug/kg Pyrene ug/kg 2-Fluorobiphenyl(S) % Nitrobenzene-d5 (S) % Terphenyl-d14 (S) % Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Spike LCS LCS % Rao Conc. Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers t680 1200 71 55-130 1680 1310 78 62-130 1680 1400 83 53-130 72 30-110 68 23-110 72 28-110 MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 2737436 MS 92453338001 Parameter Units Result 1-Methylnaphthalene ug/kg ND 2-Methylnaphthalene ug/kg ND Acenaphthene ug/kg ND Acenaphthylene ug/kg ND Anthracene ug/kg ND Benzo(a)anlhracene ug/kg ND 3enzo(a)pyrene ug/kg ND ;3enzo(b)fiuoranthene ug/kg NO 3enzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/kg NO Benzo(k)fiuoranthene ug/kg NO Chrysene ug/kg ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ug/kg NO Fluoranthene ug/kg ND Fluorene ug/kg NO Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ug/kg ND Naphthalene ug/kg NO Phenanthrene ug/kg NO Pyrene ug/kg NO 2-Fluorobiphenyl (S) % Nitrobenzene-d5 (S) % Terphenyl-d14 (S) % 2737437 MSD Spike MS MSD Conc. Result Result 5040 3470 3370 5040 3560 3340 5040 3830 3650 5040 4190 3840 5040 4210 3900 5040 4120 3870 5040 4290 4150 5040 4090 4050 5040 4370 4240 5040 4150 4010 5040 3870 3670 5040 4040 4030 5040 3950 3700 5040 3990 3670 5040 4260 4110 5040 3680 3490 5040 4040 3700 5040 4300 3930 MS MSD %Rec %Rec %Rec Limits RPD Qual 69 67 12-130 3 70 66 18-130 6 76 72 20-130 5 83 76 25-130 9 83 77 29-130 8 81 76 19-130 6 85 82 12-130 3 81 80 14-130 1 86 84 10-130 3 82 79 14-130 3 77 73 22-130 5 80 80 10-130 0 78 73 33-130 6 79 73 22-130 8 84 81 10-130 4 73 69 15-130 5 80 73 27-130 9 85 78 19-130 9 69 49 30-110 64 60 23-110 70 51 28-110 Results presented on this page are In the units Indicated by the "Units' column except whore an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the result. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This reporli shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Page 41 of 52 aceAnaiXical tim.pacelabs.cam QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 QC Batch: 510394 Analysis Method: EPA 8270E QC Balch Method: EPA 3546 Analysis Description: 8270E Solid MSSV Microwave PAH Associated Lab Samples: 92453338005 METHOD BLANK: 2738516 Associated Lab Samples: 92453338005 Parameter Units i Matrix: Blank Result Solid Reporting Limit Analyzed 1-Methylnaphlhalene ug/kg ND 330 11/19/19 14:19 2-Methylnaphthalene ug/kg ND 330 11/19/19 14:19 Acenaphthene ug/kg ND 330 11/1911914:19 Acenaphthylene ug/kg ND 330 11/19/19 14:19 Anthracene ug/kg ND 330 11/19/19 14:19 Benzo(a)anthracene ug/kg ND 330 11/1911914:19 Benzo(a)pyrene ug/kg ND 330 11/19/19 14:19 Benzo(b)fluoranthene ug/kg ND 330 11/19/19 14:19 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/kg ND 330 11/19/19 14:19 Benzo(k)fluoranthene ug/kg ND 330 11119/1914:19 Chrysene ug/kg NO 330 11/19/19 14:19 Dibenz(a,h)anlhracene ug/kg NO 330 11/19/19 14:19 Fluoranthene ug/kg NO 330 11/19/19 14:19 luorene ug/kg NO 330 11/19/19 14:19 �ndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ug/kg NO 330 11/19/19 14:19 Japhthalene ug/kg NO 330 11/19/19 14:19 Phenanthrene ug/kg NO 330 11/19/19 14:19 Pyrene ug/kg NO 330 11/19/19 14:19 2-Fluorobiphenyl(S) % 80 30-110 11/19/19 14:19 Nitrobenzene-d5 (S) % 77 23-110 11/19/19 14:19 Terphenyl-d14 (S) % 84 28-110 11/19/19 14:19 Qualifiers LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: Parameter 2738517 Units Spike Conc. LCS Result LCS %Rec %Rec Limits 1-Methylnaphlhalene ug/kg 1670 1230 74 55-130 2-Methylnaphthalene ug/kg 1670 1250 75 54-130 Acenaphthene ug/kg 1670 1380 83 60-130 Acenaphlhylene ug/kg 1670 1440 86 60-130 Anthracene ug/kg 1670 1510 91 63-130 Benzo(a)anthracene ug/kg 1670 1460 88 59-130 Benzo(a)pyrene ug/kg 1670 1500 90 57-130 Benzo(b)fluoranthene ug/kg 1670 1450 87 54-130 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/kg 1670 1550 93 59-130 Benzo(k)fluoranthene ug/kg 1670 1490 90 54-130 Chrysene ug/kg 1670 1370 82 58-130 Dibenz(a,h)anlhracene ug/kg 1670 1460 88 59-130 Fluoranthene ug/kg 1670 1400 84 65-130 Fluorene ug/kg 1670 1370 82 63-130 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ug/kg 1670 1510 91 60-130 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 Qualifiers Results presented on this page are In the units Indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the result. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except In full, Date: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, L-C. Page 42 of 52 aceAnalXical wunvpacelabuore QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 2738517 Spike LCS LCS %Rec Parameter Units Conc. Result % Rec Limits Naphthalene ug/kg 1670 1310 78 55-130 Phenanthrene ug/kg 1670 1430 86 62-130 Pyrene ug/kg 1670 1510 91 53-130 2-Fluorobiphenyl (S) % 72 30-110 Nitrobenzene-d5(S) % 70 23-110 Terphenyl-d14 (S) % 73 28-110 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 Qualifiers MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE Parameter DUPLICATE: 2738521 MS 92444633003 Spike Units Result Conc. MSD Spike Conc. 2738522 MS Result MSD Result MS % Rec MSD % Rec %Rec Limits RPD Qual 1-Melhylnaphthalene ug/kg 6490 1720 1690 6650 7480 9 58 12-130 12 M1 2-Melhylnaphthalene ug/kg 9240 1720 1690 8520 9280 -42 2 18-130 9 M1 Acenaphthene ug/kg NO 1720 1690 1420 1450 83 85 20-130 2 Acenaphthylene ug/kg NO 1720 1690 1350 1330 78 79 25-130 1 Anthracene ug/kg NO 1720 1690 1470 1460 85 86 29-130 0 Benzo(a)anthracene ug/kg NO 1720 1690 1330 1360 77 80 19-130 3 ��Benzo(a)pyrene ug/kg NO 1720 1690 1390 1410 81 83 12-130 1 3enzo(b)fluoranlhene ug/kg ND 1720 1690 1330 1320 78 78 14-130 1 _ Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/kg NO 1720 1690 1470 1570 85 92 10-130 7 Benzo(k)fluoranthene ug/kg ND 1720 1690 1370 1360 80 80 14-130 1 Chrysene ug/kg ND 1720 1690 1260 1270 73 75 22-130 1 Dibenz(a,h)anthmcene ug/kg ND 1720 1690 1470 1550 85 92 10-130 6 Fluoranlhene ug/kg ND 1720 1690 1370 1360 80 80 33-130 0 Fluorene ug/kg ND 1720 1690 1510 1560 72 76 22-130 3 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ug/kg ND 1720 1690 1460 1550 85 92 10-130 6 Naphthalene ug/kg 1300 1720 1690 2340 2050 60 44 15-130 13 Phenanthrene ug/kg ND 1720 1690 1430 1440 80 82 27-130 1 Pyrene ug/kg ND 1720 1690 1390 1390 81 82 19-130 0 2-Fluorobiphenyl(S) % 62 66 30-110 Nitrobenzene-d5 (S) % 122 137 23-110 SO Terphenyl-d14 (S) % 63 68 28.110 Results presented on this page are In the units Indicated by fte ILI IW column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the resulL REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Dale: 11/201201912:24 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,LLC. Page 43 of 52 aceAnalytical e wwPocalabs.com QUALITY CONTROL DATA Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 QC Batch: 509971 Analysis Method: MADEP EPH QC Batch Method: MADEP EPH Analysis Description: MADEP EPH NC Soil Associated Lab Samples: 92453338001, 92453338002, 92453338003, 92453338004, 92453338005 METHOD BLANK: 2736776 Matrix: Solid Associated Lab Samples: 92453338001, 92453338002, 92453338003, 92453338004, 92453338005 Blank Reporting Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers Aliphatic (C09-C18) mg/kg ND 9.9 11/18/19 16:07 N2 Aliphatic (C19-C36) mg/kg NO 9.9 11/18/19 16:07 N2 Aromatic (C11-C22) mg/kg NO 9.9 11/18/19 16:07 N2 2-Bromonaphthalene (S) % 98 40-140 11/18/19 16:07 2-Fluorobiphenyl (S) % 104 40-140 11/18/19 16:07 Nonalriaoontane (S) % 71 40-140 11/18/19 16:07 o-Terphenyl(S) % 82 40-140 11/18/19 16:07 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE 8 LCSD: 2736777 2736778 Spik 1-CS LCSD LIDS LCSD % Rec Max Parameter Units Conc. Result Result 110 NO NO % Rec % Rao 46 50 Limits RPD 40-140 RPD Qualifiers 50 N2 Aliphatic (C09-Cl8) mg/kg `kliphatic (C19-C36) mg/kg 13.4 NO NO 70 68 40-140 50 N2 Aromatic(C11-C22) mg/kg 28.4 22.9 21.5 80 75 40-140 6 50 N2 2-Bromonaphthalene (S) % 81 81 40-140 2-Fluorobiphenyl(S) % 98 107 40-140 Nonatriaoontane (S) % 75 66 40-140 o-Terphenyl(S) % 93 85 40-140 MATRIX SPIKE 8 MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 2736779 2736780 MS MSD 92453338001 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD %Rec Parameter Units Result Conc, Conc. Result Result % Rao % Rec Limits RPD Qual Aliphatic(C09-C18) mg/kg NO 3d.4 31.1 ND NO 23 32 40.140 M1,N2 Aliphatic (C19-C36) mg/kg ND 46.6 41.2 ND NO 58 63 40-140 N2 Aromatic (C11-C22) mg/kg ND 86.4 87.6 49.1 63.7 54 70 40.140 26 N2 2-Bromonaphthalene (S) % 45 40 40-140 2-Fluorobiphenyl (S) % 87 99 40-140 Nonatriacontane (S) % 61 66 40-140 o-Terphenyl(S) % 63 76 40-140 Results presented on this page are In the units Indicated b' the 9lnits• column except where an allemale unit Is presented to the right of the result. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM without the wA.sn consent of Pace Analytical Services, L-C. Page 44 of 52 aceAnalXical www.paceleEs.cste QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 9800Kincey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 (704)875-9092 QC Balch: 509363 Analysis Method: ASTM D2974-87 QC Batch Method: ASTM D2974-87 Analysis Description: Dry Weight/Percent Moisture Associated Lab Samples: 92453338001, 92453338002, 92453338003, 92453338004, 92453338005, 92453338007, 92453338008 SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 2733769 92453084001 Dup Parameter Units Result Result RPD Qualifiers Percent Moisture % 31.2 24.0 26 D6 SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 2733770 92453505003 Dup Parameter Units Result Result RPD Qualifiers Percent Moisture % 26.6 26.5 0 Results presented on We page are In the units Indicated by Me'Units' column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the result REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, U.C. Page 45 of 52 Pace Analytical Services, LLC aceAnalytical o 9800 Kinsey Ave. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 wvaapacelabs.com (704)875-9092 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 QC Balch: 509833 Analysis Method: EPA 9060A QC Balch Method: EPA 9060A Analysis Description: 9060 TOC, AVL Associated Lab Samples: 92453338001, 92453338002, 92453338003, 92453338004, 92453338005, 92453338007, 92453338008 METHOD BLANK: 2735998 Matrix: Water Associated Lab Samples: 92453338001, 92453338002, 92453338003, 92453338004, 92453338005, 92453338007, 92453338008 Blank Reporting Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers Mean Total Organic Carbon mg/kg ND 600 11116/1911:15 Total Organic Carbon mg/kg ND 600 11116/19 11:15 Total Organic Carbon mg/kg ND 600 11/16/1911:15 Total Organic Carbon mg/kg ND 600 11/16/1911:15 Total Organic Carbon mg/kg ND 600 11/1611911:15 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 2735999 Spike LCS LCS % Rae Parameter Units Cone. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers Mean Total Organic Carbon mg/kg 120000 125000 104 80-120 Total Organic Carbon mg/kg 120000 125000 104 Total Organic Carbon mg/kg 120000 120000 100 Total Organic Carbon mg/kg 120000 131000 109 'Total Organic Carbon mg/kg 120000 125000 104 MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 2736000 2736001 MS MSD 92453338001 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD %Rec Parameter Units Result Cone. Cone. Result Result % Rae % Rae Limits RPD Qual Mean Total Organic Carbon mg/kg 48400 148000 148000 198000 191000 101 97 80-120 3 Total Organic Carbon mg/kg 48400 148000 148000 208000 217000 108 114 4 Total Organic Carbon mg/kg 48500 148000 148000 197000 160000 100 76 21 Total Organic Carbon mg/kg 47500 148000 148000 187000 214000 94 113 14 Total Organic Carbon mg/kg 48900 148000 148000 199000 173000 102 84 14 Results presented on this page are in the units Indicated by the'UnIW column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right at the result Date: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Page 46 of 52 Pace Analytical Services, LLC ® 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 aceAnalytical Huntersville, NC 28078 w .pacelaluixam (704)875-9092 QUALIFIERS Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 DEFINITIONS DF - Dilution Factor, if reported, represents the factor applied to the reported data due to dilution of the sample aliquot. NO - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit. TNTC - Too Numerous To Count J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit. MDL -Adjusted Method Detection Limit. PQL -Practical Quantitation Limit. RL - Reporting Limit -The lowest concentration value that meets project requirements for quantitative data with known precision and bias for a specific analyte in a specific matrix. S - Surrogate 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine decomposes to and cannot be separated from Azobenzene using Method 8270. The result for each analyte is a combined concentration. Consistent with EPA guidelines, unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and RPD values. LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate) MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate) DUP - Sample Duplicate RPD - Relative Percent Difference NC - Not Calculable. SG - Silica Gel - Clean -Up U - Indicates the compound was analyzed for, but not detected. Acid preservation may not be appropriate for 2 Chloroethylvinyl ether. A separate vial preserved to a pH of 4-5 is recommended in SW846 Chapter 4 for the analysis of Acrolein and Acrylonitrile by EPA Method 8260. N-Nilrosodiphenylamine decomposes and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine using Method 8270. The result reported for each analyte is a combined concentration. Pace Analytical is TNI accredited. Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes. TNI - The NELAC Institute. LABORATORIES PASI-A Pace Analytical Services - Asheville PASI-C Pace Analytical Services - Charlotte ANALYTE QUALIFIERS BC The same analyte was detected in an associated blank at a concentration above 1/2 the reporting limit but below the laboratory reporting limit. D3 Sample was diluted due to the presence of high levels of non -target analyles or other matrix interference. D6 The precision between the sample and sample duplicate exceeded laboratory control limits. M1 Matrix spike recovery exceeded QC limits. Batch accepted based on laboratory control sample (LCS) recovery. N2 The lab does not hold NELAC/TNI accreditation for this parameter but other accreditalions/certifications may apply. A complete list of accreditations/certifications is available upon request. So Surrogate recovery outside laboratory control limits. St Surrogate recovery outside laboratory control limits (confirmed by re -analysis). v1 The continuing calibration verification was above the method acceptance limit. Any detection for the analyte in the associated samples may have a high bias. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, L-C. Page 47 of 52 Pace Analytical Services, LLC aceAnalj41cal0 9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078078 www.Pacelabs.cam (704)875-9092 QUALITY CONTROL DATA CROSS REFERENCE TABLE Project: Pace Project No.: Cape Fear Dredge 92453338 Analytical Lab ID Sample ID QC Batch Method QC Batch Analytical Method Batch 92453338001 D-1 EPA 3546 510174 EPA 8081B 510284 92453338002 D-2 EPA 3546 510174 EPA 8081B 510284 92453338003 D-3 EPA 3546 510174 EPA 8081E 510284 92453338004 D-4 EPA 3546 510174 EPA 8081B 510284 92453338005 D-5 EPA 3546 510174 EPA 8081 B 510284 92453338001 D-1 9071B 510067 9071B 510100 92453338002 D-2 9071B 510067 9071B 510100 92453338003 D-3 9071B 510067 9071B 510100 92453338004 D-4 9071B 510067 9071B 510100 92453338005 D-5 9071B 510067 9071B 510100 92453338001 D-1 MADEP EPH 509971 MADEP EPH 510288 92453338002 D-2 MADEP EPH 509971 MADEP EPH 510288 92453338003 D-3 MADEP EPH 509971 MADEP EPH 510288 92453338004 D-4 MADEP EPH 509971 MADEP EPH 510288 92453338005 D-5 MADEP EPH 509971 MADEP EPH 510288 92453338001 D-1 MADEP VPH 509289 MADEP VPH 509845 92453338002 D-2 MADEP VPH 509289 MADEP VPH 509845 92453338003 D-3 MADEP VPH 509289 MADEP VPH 509845 . 92453338004 D-4 MADEP VPH 509289 MADEP VPH 509845 82453338005 D-5 MADEP VPH 509289 MADEP VPH 509845 92453338001 D-1 F,PA 3050E 509739 EPA6010D 509873 92453338002 D-2 PA 3050B 509739 EPA6010D 509873 92453338003 D-3 EPA 3050B 509739 EPA6010D 509873 92453338004 D-4 EPA 3050B 509739 EPA6010D 509873 92453338005 D-5 EPA 3050B 509739 EPA6010D 509873 92453338007 D-1 Duplicate EPA 3050B 509739 EPA6010D 509873 92453338008 D-1 Triplicate EPA 3050B 509739 EPA6010D 509873 92453338001 D-1 E PA 7471 B 509724 EPA 7471 B 509765 92453338002 D-2 EPA7471B 509724 EPA 7471E 509765 92453338003 D-3 EPA7471B 509724 EPA 7471B 509765 92453338004 D-4 EPA 7471E 509724 EPA7471B 509765 92453338005 D-5 EPA 7471 B 509724 EPA 7471 B 509765 92453338007 D-1 Duplicate EPA 7471B 509724 EPA 7471E 509765 92453338008 D-1 Triplicate EPA 7471B 509724 EPA 7471B 509765 92453338001 D-1 EPA 3546 510140 EPA 8270E 510217 92453338002 D-2 EPA 3546 510140 EPA 8270E 510217 92453338003 D-3 EPA 3546 510140 EPA 8270E 510217 92453338004 D-4 EPA 3546 510140 EPA 8270E 510217 92453338005 D5 IEPA 3546 510394 EPA 8270E 510564 92453338001 D-1 1 EPA 5035A 509600 EPA 8260D 509603 92453338002 D-2 PA 5035A 509746 EPA 8260D 509770 92453338003 D-3 PA 5035A 509746 EPA 82600 509770 92463338004 D-4 EPA 5035A 509746 EPA 8260D 509770 92453338005 D-5 EPA 5035A 509746 EPA 8260D 509770 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Dale: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM Without the wdRen consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Page 48 of 52 Pace Analytical Services, LLC Kincey100 aceAnalXical o 9800Hunte svlle, NCve.1te 28078 www.pacelabs.com (704)875-9092 QUALITY CONTROL DATA CROSS REFERENCE TABLE Project: Cape Fear Dredge Pace Project No.: 92453338 Lab ID Sample ID QC Batch Method Analytical QC Batch Analytical Method Batch 92453338001 D-1 ASTM D2974-87 509363 92453338002 D-2 ASTM D2974-87 509363 92453338003 D-3 ASTM D2974-87 509363 92453338004 D-4 ASTM D2974-87 509363 92453338005 D-5 ASTM D2974-87 509363 92453338007 D-1 Duplicate ASTM D2974-87 509363 9245333800E D-1 Triplicate ASTM D2974-87 509363 92453338001 D-1 EPA 9060A 509833 92453338002 D-2 EPA 9060A 509833 92453338003 D-3 EPA 9060A 509833 92453338004 D-4 EPA 9060A 509833 92453338005 D-5 EPA 9060A 509833 92453338007 D4 Duplicate EPA 9060A 509833 92453338008 D-1 Triplicate EPA 9060A 509833 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 11/20/2019 12:24 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Page 49 of 52 i m Document Name: Sample Condition Upon Recel t(SCUR) Document Revised: February 7, 2018 Page I of Analytleal Document No.: Issuing Authority: F-CAR-CS-033-Rev.05 Pace Carolinas Quality Office Laboratory receiving samples: Asheville ❑ Eden[—] Greenwood ❑ Huntersvllle ❑ Raleigh[] Mechanicsville[] • client N me: y� /'��W9#'' ��453338, - 1 G� 0 1 1 Project #: Courier: Fed Ex ❑UPS ❑LISPS ❑Client II III�(!I'I Ilrl I Irlllll`'I' ❑ Commercial ❑P LEe ❑other. 92453336 Custody Seal Present? es ❑No Seals intact? es []NO ---"—"-"'---""-` - ,_ Bate/Initleh Person Examining Contents:,�IIL� 1` � Packing Material: ❑Bubble Wrap ❑Bubble Bags ❑None ❑ Other Biological Tissue cozen? Thermometer. ❑Yes ❑No N/A ❑IR Gun ID: 92TO58 Type ellm: et ❑Blue ❑None Cooler Temp (Y): Correction Factor: Add/Subtract ('C) O.OeC Temp shouldbe abovefreezeng to 6'C, Cooler Temp Corrected ('el: ❑Samples out oftemp criteria. Samples an ice, cooling process hasbegun USDA Regulated oll (❑ N/A, water sample) Did samples oN ' ate Ina quarantine zone within the United States: CA, NY, or SC (check maps)? Did samples originate from aforeign source lint banally, . r_l _- InrAdine Hawaflantl Puerto Rlral7 l-IYea 0 a comments/Ohcre anc . Chain of CustodyPresent? Yes ,t. ONO ONIA 1. Samples Arrived within Hold Time? - es ONO x a 2. Short Haiti Time Analysis J<n hr.)? ves o N a 3. ' Rush Turn Around Time Re uasted? Over No ❑N/A �4. i4clent Volume? Correct Containers Used? -Pace. Containers Used? lbly. vFs V ONO ONO EINIA ❑N/A NA S. 6. ' I' ' Containers intact? ves —[7]No ONO N A 7. Dissolved analysis: Samples Field Filtered? ON. /A 8. Sample -Labels Match COC? -Includes Date/Time/ID/Anal sis Matrix, Yees SL ❑N/A 9. uhW �n Q' W.OLIYV' d �PEQRy Coc .� ' Headsace in VOA Vials>S-Gmm? OYU No /A 10. Trip Olank Present? TripBlank CustodySeals Present? Oyes Yes ONO No A In 11. COMMENTS/SAMPLE DISCREPANCY Lot ID of split contalnars: CLIENT NOTIFICATION/RESOLUTION Person. Contacted: Project Manager SCURF Review: Project Manager SRF Review: Date/nme: Field Data Required? Over ONO Date: Vrs Date: 11/1.3 Page 50 of 52 Document Name: Document Revised: February 7, 2018 w aceMalytical Sample Condition Upon Recel t(SCUR) Page 1 of 2 Document No.: Issuing Authority: FCAR-CS-033-Rev.06 Pace Carolinas quality Office *Check mark top half of box if pH and/or dechlorination Is verified and within the acceptance range for preservation samples. Exceptions: VOA, Callform, TOC, Oil and Grease, DRO/8015 (water) DOC, LLHg "Bottom half of`box Is to list number of bottle Project q TWO -: 92453338 PMfi PTE'' "Due%Date: 11/29/19 CL-IENT`.'WTereac; z z a ¢ ¢ 6 O Y .`. z ry ? 1° m 9q, V Z Z % S .Z.. Y• a \ $zgl Z y' Z Z 6 V N N O d o to .n c e� ,�, 2 .z e e e —94 cE S Z 7 S •S1 '��. V V E ^ac E ' E :' E E 1 6 E E J E J E, Q Q J. o Q `v 'J E wV i• E - >. E Y E % E s J E .E J E J E IT E Q E yyv N 0 IG 'I 2 t 4 2 - 5 7 1D I 11 12 pH Adjustn ent Log,for Preserved Samples Sample ID Type of Preservative pH upon receipt Date pmservadon adjusted 'Time presenalon • adjusted Amount of preservative added WIN Note: Whenever there is a discrepancy affecting North Carauna compaance samples, a copy or usu roan wm oe sent to me nann earoima ucnnn s mucauvn usnce p.e. Out ofhold, Incorrect preservative, out oftemp, incorrectcontainers — --- Page 51 of 52 CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY 1 Analytical Request Document o ce The Chain -of -Custody is a LEGAL. DOCUMENT, All relevant fields must be completed accurately. m Section A Section R Section C or Required Client Information: Required Project hNortwtion: Invoice lydomladon: Page: t Of t Company. Tonacen-Savannah, GA Report To: Leah Mope OOC Attention: I - Adoress: =01 Rovtand Ave Copy To: Company Name:' Savannah:GA31404 Address: 'Lp;t Ali p,- —'.-'—'•'r^ Email Imiodre lerteedn.com Purchase Orders: ESIOJ—TSLII, Paw Ouale Plane: NONE lFax Pmjeet Name: CEDE Fear DrEdge Pam Project Manages tayles.M.1liepowlabs.mrN Requested Due Data: Project d: F 00 1 q Pare Profle&. 7728.1 Nd R uesee'd`Aiial—is:FuremE" .M. CODE 9 u COLLECTED i Preservatives {•R amp vvm pW g s SAMPLE ID �'�e°° a u START EnTIME onD cnaraLler PCr be:. vM N9 _ d y (A•Z, 0-9!••) o�iee o o F a 9 I& ug U Somple Ids must be unique rn.u. a 3. 21 3 u '2N�99a= O P tm u g W ~ y;s s w�oso333) DATE TIME DATE i -i O M 0 C, W is ✓ ✓ 00S W IVIS s = — 'P Cil I W zD ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ t�4 A j %�„T ya n "�ACC6gED UYIAFFlWTON r`:i GATE L .% rt PLECONDI110N9xr imxp .I x..._tA00IiW(LILCOMMPl7?y'?�'-'-�,"ry ,.,N_..RNgSHEDB;/AFFWFTi.ON.i.x_ ..-wa.:._:.>;.: �i.t�va.y3.�Y..�l�ii....�T.e-.y- .ai£..:v iu+�a j,1TME ��'Y'.11..y ..�rY.... �.'�L2`� ae n•IlICI WD0 rJ r Cg Terrwccrt tt•11-19 1�00 a+r...� - S m PRINT Name of SAMPLER: Q i1 ire, w m O v m $ m o m SIGNATURE of SAMPLER: - DATE Sig ed. Page 1 of 5 Jennifer Waters - Fwd: RE: [External] Re: Soil Sampling Requirements From: Angelo Waters To: Jennifer Waters Date: 5/4/2020 12:18 PM Subject: Fwd: RE: [External] Re: Soil Sampling Requirements Attachments: IMAGE.jpeg; IMAGE.jpeg FYI >>> "Lane, Ervin' <ervin.lane@ncdenr.gov> 5/4/2020 12:04 PM >>> Mr. Waters, If the material is disposed of at a CDF as designated and overseen by the USACE, the Solid Waste would not object. Due to arsenic and cobalt concentrations, the material should not be placed on undisturbed properties or any area not designated as a CDF. Feel free to contact me if you would like to further discuss. Ervin Lane Hydlrogeolopst, Solid WasteSection North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality 919.707.8288 (Office) Ervklane@ncdenr.gov Ema;l comes onderxe to and from it address is sub(ect to ft AkwVl CerolM Pubt Rewrds taw and may be ttfscbssed to 1hhd partf6s. From: Angelo Waters [aiwaters@urbanengineers.coml Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2020 3:26 PM To: Lane, Ervin <ervin.lane@ncdenr.gov> Cc: Jennifer Waters <jlwaters@urbanengineers.com> Subject: RE: [External] Re: Soil Sampling Requirements CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to reoort.spam@nc.gov Good afternoon Ervin, I am touching base regarding the maintenance dredging project at National Gypsum in Wilmington, INC. In January (see email below), we provided you with the sediment sampling results from the proposed maintenance dredge area. We are in permit scoping discussions with DEQ, Division of Water Resources and the Army Corps of Engineers. The dredge sediment will be hydraulically pumped to an upland CDF located directly across the Cape Fear River from the maintenance dredge area (project location map is attached). The dredge material will be discharged at the CDF, which will be isolated by an earthen berm. After the dredge material is placed in the isolated area, effluent will drain back to the river in a controlled manner via a weir system. file:///C:/Users/j lwaters/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwise/5EB007F9urbanO l urban-hgl00... 5/28/2020 Page 2 of 5 Please clarify (from a Solid Waste Section perspective) that the sediment results we supplied in January is sufficient for this upland CDF. Thanks, Angelo Angelo J. Waters, PE, Leed AP I Vice President- Environmental Services Urban Engineers, Inc. 1.530 Walnut Street I Philadelphia, PA 19106 Office: 215-922-8081, ext. 1273 1 Cell: 215-284-316 Connect with Us: finstaltram.coml 1lnstagram.comlFacebook rfacebook.coml I YouTube ryoutube.coml I Twitter rtwltter.coml I Linkedln rllnkedln.Coml 1 Instaeram rinstaaram.coml Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information. If you receive this message in error or are not the Intended recipient, notify the sender Immediately and do not retain, distribute, disclose or use any of this Information and destroy the e-mail and any attachments or copies. >>> "Lane, Ervin" <ervin.laneC@ncdenr.aov> 1/8/2020 2:57 PM >>> Mr. Waters, The material may be transported to any property that is designated as a confined disposal facility such as the two identified in the report. Due to concentrations of arsenic and cobalt above the PSRGs, the material should not be transported to undisturbed properties or any area not designed for dredge material disposal. Feel free to contact me if you have additional questions. D E Qvat S!'MtA!f` mvsstttvAiWsfiq Enin Lane Hyrliogeologist, Solid.1frasteSection North -Carolina Dep=nent of Environmental Quality 919.707.8288 (Office) Ervin.Lanera�ncdenr.gov Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the Noah Cartfiga Public records Lawami maybe dsCbseci to fhiref panles. From: Angelo Waters rmailto:aiwaters@urbanenRineers.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2020 1:48 PM file:///C:/Users/jlwaters/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwise/5EB007F9urbanO l urban-hq 100... 5/28/2020 Page 3 of 5 To: Lane, Ervin <ervin.lane@ncdenr.gov> 1 Cc: Jennifer Waters<jiwaters@urbanengineers.com> Subject: RE: [External] Re: Soil Sampling Requirements CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to renort.spam@ne.goy Ervin, Last year you provided guidance tome with regard to soil standards (see string below). We have proceeded with conducting sediment sampling at our clients facility in anticipation of potentially transporting the dredge material to a privately owned parcel located across the Cape Fear River from our site. The privately owned parcel was previously used for dredge disposal. I have attached the sediment sampling report for your reference. In summary, arsenic and cobalt were the only constituents to exceed the residential health based PSRG's and the protection of groundwater PSRG's. There were no volatile organic exceedances or detections. Based on the previous use of the accepting parcel as a dredge disposal facility, is it possible that our dredge material can be transported to and disposed at this parcel? Thank you in advance for your guidance -Angelo Angelo J. Waters, PE, Leed AP I Vice President - Urban Engineers, Inc. 1 530 Walnut Street I Phil Office: 215-922-8081, ext. 1273 1 Cell: 215-284- Connect with Us: www.urbanengineers.com Facebook I YouTube I Twitter I Linkedln Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail and any attachments may co the sender Immediately and do not retain, distribute, disclose c >>> Angelo Waters 4/4/2019 11:48 AM >>> Ervin, Thank you again. Very helpful. -Angelo ental Services PA 19106 I information. If you receive this message in error or are not the intended recipient, notify information and destroy the e-mail and any attachments or copies. Angelo 1. Waters, PE, Leed AP I Vice President - Environmental Services Urban Engineers, Inc. 1 530 Walnut Street I Philadelphia, PA 19106 Office: 215-922-8081, ext. 1273 1 Cell: 215-284-3161 Connect with Us: file:///C:/Users/jlwaters/AppData/Local/Temp{XPgrpwise/5 EB 007F 9urbanO l urban-hq 100... 5/28/2020 Page 4 of 5 www. u rba n e nF, i n e e rs. c o m Facebook I YouTube I Twitter I Linkedln I Instagram Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information. If you receive this message in error or are not the intended recipient, notify the sender Immediately and do not retain, distribute, disclose or use I any of is information and destroy the e-mail and any attachments or copies. >>> "Lane, Ervin' <ervin.lane@ncdencoov> 4/4/2019 11:46 AM >>> Placement of dredge spoils on the same property would only need to be sampled if a known contaminant release occurred where the dredge spoils are located. If there was not a known release, the spoils can be excavated and placed on the same property without being sampled. From: Angelo Waters<aiwaters(lurbaneneinee'rs.com> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2019 10:38 AM To: Lane, Ervin <ervin.lane@ncdenr.¢ov> Subject: [External] Re: Soil Sampling Requirements = CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to Thank you. Can you confirm that placement of dredge spoils on the same property also does not need to be sampled? -Angelo Angelo J. Waters, PE, Leed AP I Vice President- Environmental Services Urban Engineers, Inc. 1 530 Walnut Street I Philadelphia, PA 19106 Office: 215-922-8081, ext. 1273 1 Cell: 215-284-3161 Connect with Us: www.urbanengineers.com Facebook I YouTube I Twitter I Linkedln I Instazram Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information. If you receive this message in error or are not the Intended recipient, notify the sender immediately and do not retain, distribute, disclose or use any of this information and destroy the e-mail and any attachments or copies. >>> "Lane, Ervin" <ervin.lane@ncdenr.aov> 4/4/2019 10:33 AM >>> Mr. Waters, As stated in my voicemail, soil being excavated and moved to a different area within the same parcel does not need to be sampled. Soil that is excavated and proposed to be moved to another property should be analyzed for a total file:///C:/Users/jlwaters/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwise/5EB007F9urbanO l urban-hg100... 5/28/2020 Page 5 of 5 constituent analysis of Appendix I volatile organic compounds via EPA Method 8260 and Metals via EPA method 6010. These results should be compared to the Residential health based and Protection of groundwater preliminary soil remediation goals in the table below: PSRG Table If the results are less than both values in those two columns, the material can be classified as inert and can be placed anywhere without restrictions. Feel free to contact me if you have any additional questions. file:///C:/Users/j lwaters/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwis e/5EB007F 9urban0l urban-hq 100... 5/28/2020 North Carolina Department ofEnvironinental Quality C ` Division of Coastal Management Q Major Permit Application m Section 16—Scoping Meeting Minutes CAMA MAJOR PERMIT APPLICATION SECTION 16 - SCOPING MEETING MINUTES Two scoping meetings were held for this project; one on July 30, 2019 to discuss disposal facility and dredging options and a follow-up on April 17, 2020 once a potential disposal facility was identified. The minutes from these meetings are included in this section. National Gypsum Wilmington Scaping Meeting July 30, 2019 The sign -in sheet will be provided by Cameron Weaver. After introductions, Peter Brennan explained that the proposed project involves maintenance dredging of approximately 6,000 to 7,000 cubic yards of material adjacent to National Gypsum's Wilmington Facility berth. He indicated the dredging would occur to -36 feet and we were previously permitted to - 44 feet. Meghan Zehringer explained that the project is needed in the near future (in 2020) to continue operations at the Wilmington facility. Jennifer Waters explained the dredge disposal options that have assessed to date and associated challenges, which included: • Disposal of material at Eagle Island — New US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) requirements prohibit disposal at Eagle Island. • Disposal of material onsite — 8.2 acres is available onsite, however, a majority of this area is covered in wetlands and regulated trees. The dredge material would be — 6 to 8 feet high saturated onsite. • Disposal of material at an upland facility — Dewatering is required, and a location to dewater is not available and ciewatering on barges would take significant time. • Ocean Dumping— Very complex and timely process. • Agitation Dredging —Typically limited to shallow dredge areas (<2 feet). Jennifer Waters inquired about the potential to use agitation dredging for this project since the project is maintenance dredging and is shallow in most of the dredge area. Urban and National Gypsum confirmed that the Major Permit would be for dredging only and that there would be no additions to the pier structure at this time. Tyler Crumbley from the USACE indicated that critical habitat for Atlantic Sturgeon are within the project area. He also indicated that Primary Nursery Areas (PNA) are within the project area. He indicated that the USACE would not object to agitation dredging but impacts to the critical habitat and PNA would need to be assessed. He also indicated that the project is located in manatee habitat and the guidelines to protect manatee must be followed. Kathryn Thurston from the City of Wilmington indicated that she has no comments on the project since it is outside of her jurisdiction. However, she indicated that Sunset Park is on the National Register of Historic Places and if the project area is visible from the Park, Section 106 would be required. Richard from the National Marine Fisheries indicated that agitation dredging is not ideal due to potential impacts downstream to Atlantic Sturgeon. He confirmed that an Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) review would be required for the potential PNA impacts. Peter Brennan inquired about the possibility to dispose of the material in the water within National Gypsum's property. USACE and NCDENR indicated this would be fill and would not be a good option. Curt Weychert indicated that avoidance of impacts is ideal and then minimization of impacts. He indicated that the reason for not employing mechanical means of dredging must be thoroughly explained in order to be approved to use another method. He indicated that there will likely be seasonal restrictions on dredging. Urban and National Gypsum indicated they are aware of this and are prepared to dredge in late fall/early winter. USACE and NCDENR recommended that National Gypsum contact the North Carolina State Ports Authority to see if they can be included in the Ports large dredging project. Cameron Weaver recommended to contact Todd Walton (todd.walton@ncports.com). SIGN UP SHEET SCOPING MEETING National Gypsum Dredging Proposal New Hanover Count July 30, 2019 Name Agency Phone Email Cameron Weaver NCDEQ-DEACS 910-796-7265 CameIon.Weayer(%a,ncdenr.goy Jordan Jessop USACE 910-251-4810 Jordan.JessopOusace.army.mll Tyler Crumbley USACE 910-251-4170 Ty1er.Crumbley(d),usace.armv.mil Curt Weychert DMF 252-808-8050 Curt.Weychert(i�ncdenr.gov Chad Coburn DWR-401 910-796-7379 Chad.Coburn(@ncdenr.gov Jennifer Waters Urban Engineers 215-922-8081 x 1292 ilwaters(@urganengineers.com Tara MacPherson DCM 910-796-7425 Tara.MacPherson(d)ncdenr.gov Debbie Wilson DCM 910-796-7266 Debra.Wilson(@ncdenr.gov Peter Brennan Urban Engineers 215-922-8081 x 1092 PBrennan n urbanengineers.com Meghan Zehringer National Gypsum 704-365-7405/ 719-310-9446 Meghanz(a,nationalgyasum.com Brendan Brock DCM 910-796-7270 Brendan.Brockna,ncdenr.goy *Maria Dunn NCWRC 252-948-3916 Maria.Dunn(a ncwildlife.org *Kathy Matthews US FWS 919-856-4520 x 27 Kathryn Matthews(a)fws.gov *Fritz Rohde NOAA-NMF 252-838-0828 Fritz.Rohde(a)na� oaa.gov Tyler McGuire DCM 910-796-7424 Tyler.McGuire(a,ncdenr.goy Kathryn Thurston City of Wilmington 910-341-3249 K&an.Thurston(@wilmingtonnc.gov X Unavailable *by Conference Line *919-420-1375 NCDEQ WILMINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE 127 CARDINAL DRIVE WILMINGTON, NC 28405 910-796-7215, FAX 910-350-2004 National Gypsum Wilmington Scoping Meeting April 17, 2020 The sign -in sheet will be provided by Cameron Weaver. After introductions, Jennifer Waters discussed the proposed project and summarized the results of the July 30, 2019 Scoping Meeting that was held for the same project. She explained that the proposed project involves maintenance dredging of approximately 17,000 cubic yards of material adjacent to National Gypsum's Wilmington Facility berth. She indicated the dredging would occur to -36 feet and the area previously permitted to -44 feet. Ms. Waters explained the National Gypsum has identified a potential private disposal facility directly across the Cape Fear River in Brunswick County. Meghan Zehringer explained that the project is needed in the near future to continue operations at the Wilmington facility. Ms. Waters explained that National Gypsum plans to apply for maintenance dredging the area via hydraulic dredging (this was the method previously approved in permits obtained in the 1990s and 2000s). She inquired about potentially also using mechanical dredging in certain locations due to the presence of timber in the dredge area. Tyler Crumbley recommended that the potential use of both dredging methods be included in the permit application. Ms. Waters inquired about piggybacking on the Cape Fear Channel maintenance in the project area. Mr. Crumbley indicated that this area is dredged each year and that the North Carolina State Ports Authority should be contacted to see if National Gypsum's project could piggyback an upcoming channel dredging project. Ms. Zehringer inquired about the permit needed to piggyback on the channel dredging project. It was recommended that National Gypsum obtain a permit at the private disposal facility in case the piggybacking project does not work out. It;was confirmed that if National Gypsum piggybacks on this project, it would make use of the NCSPA disposal permit, and National Gypsum would not need its own separate permit to dispose at Eagle Island. Mr. Crumbley indicated that the recent 2020 SARBO will likely apply to the project and would preclude the need for species assessments, including Atlantic Sturgeon. Twyla Cheatwood indicated that an EFH assessment is still required. Mr. Crumbley indicated that the USACE requires the following items in addition to the items required for the DCM permit: 1) Biological Assessment, 2) EFH Assessment, and 3) Discussion on impact avoidance and minimization measures. Tara McPherson indicated that the permit applications are sent to DCM and then are filtered to all of the relevant agencies. She stated that at least one hard copy is required (printed on 8.5"xll" or 11"x17" paper). If there is significant color maps/pages, five hard copies are required. Kelly Johnson indicated that if there is no construction occurring as part of the project, you can apply for a State stormwater exclusion. If minor construction is required related to the weir and effluent structure, there are general permits related to stormwater to which this would apply. Peter Brennan indicated that the site should be generally usable, however, an inspection will be performed to verify the condition, and minor maintenance may be required on the existing weir and outlet structure. Mr. Crumbley indicated that this would be permitted under the PGP 291 process. It was indicated that if the wetlands on the private disposal facility will be impacted, this will need to be addressed in the application. Ms. Zehringer indicated that National Gypsum had previously disposed of material at the private disposal area. Ms. McPherson and Robb Mairs indicated there may be surface water quality issues from effluent and that correspondence with NCbEQ should be provided in the permit package. SIGN UP SHEET SCOPING MEETING National Gypsum *by Conference Line for all Dredging Proposal New Hanover County April 17, 2020 Name Agency Phone Email Cameron Weaver NCDEQ-DEACS 910-796-7265 Cameron.Weayer(C/7,ncdenngoy Greg Currey USACE 910-251-4707 Gregory.E.Currey6c�usace.armv.mil Tyler Crumbley USACE 910-251-4170 Tyler. Crumbley(c usace.army.mil Curt Weychert DCM 252-808-2808 Curt.Wevchert(@ncdenr.eov Robb Mairs DWR-401 910-796-7303 Robb.Mairs(@ncdenr.gov Jennifer Waters Urban Engineers 215-922-8081 x 1292 ilwatersna,urbanengineers.com Tara MacPherson DCM 910-796-7266 Tara.MacPherson(oDncdenr.gov Maria Dunn NCWRC 252-948-3916 Maria.Dunn(&ncwildlife.ore Peter Brennan Urban Engineers 215-922-8081 x 1092 PBrennan(@urbanengineers.com Meghan Zehringer National Gypsum 704-365-7405/ 719-310-9446 Meghanzna,nationalgypsum.com Kathy Matthews US FWS 919-856-4520 x 27 Katbryn Matthewsna,fws.gov Jimmy Harrison DMF 252-948-3845 James.Harrisonnn,nedenr.eov Patrick Amico DCM 910-796-7423 Patrick.AmicoPnedenr.gov Rhonda Hall DEMLR-LQ 910-796-7312 Rhonda.Hall(@ncdenr.gov Mike Thomas Urban Engineers mithomas(@urbanengineers.com Kelly Johnson DEMLR-SW 910-796-7343 Kelly.P.Johnson(a4ncdenr.gov Twyla Cheatwood NOAA-NMF 252-728-8758 Twyla.Cheatwood(@noaa.gov X Unavailable NCDEQ WILMINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE 127 CARDINAL DRIVE WILMINGTON, NC 28405 910-796-7215,FAX 910-350-2004 North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality CDivision of Coastal Management `Q Major Permit Application mSection 17—Avoidance and Minimization Measures J� URBRn■ CAMA MAJOR PERMIT APPLICATION SECTION 17 - AVOIDANCE & MINIMIZATION MEAURES As indicated during the April 17, 2020 scoping meeting, avoidance and minimization measures were identified and evaluated for the project. Avoidance and Mitigation Measures National Gypsum Wilmington Maintenance Dredging Maintenance Dredging Activities The proposed maintenance dredging project has been designed to avoid and minimize effects on listed species and environmental resources. The dredge area will be limited to an approximately i,000 feet x 130 feet area to minimize impacts. In addition, a turbidity barrier will be installed around the dredge during maintenance dredging to minimize impacts. The project duration time has also been limited to the greatest extent possible; the anticipated time to complete the dredging activities will be only approximately 2 weeks. The dredging will take place only during daytime hours to minimize impacts to nocturnal species. Seasonal restrictions for maintenance dredging will be adhered to as directed by the regulatory agencies to protect migrations of fish, sensitive life stages of aquatic organisms, and threatened and endangered species. The Fish and Wildlife Service Guidelines for Avoiding Impacts to the West Indian Manatee will also be followed during maintenance dredging. No vegetation is anticipated to be impacted during the maintenance dredging activities. Confined Disposal Facility The confined disposal facility (CDF) has historically been used as a dredge disposal area and therefore the use of this area will not change. The CDF preparation and dredge material placement duration will be limited to the greatest extent possible; it is anticipated to take approximately 2 to 4 weeks to complete. The CDF will contain all of the dredged material, which will be confined on high ground to prevent spill -over of solids into any marsh or surrounding waters. The disposal process will be monitored and the flow rate will be regulated to avoid overtopping of the CDF berms and prevent excessive ponding. Once the solids settle, the effluent will drain back to the river in a controlled manner through the weir. Both the weir elevation and effluent content will be monitored to stay within permitted effluent parameters. Specifically, turbidity and arsenic would be monitored to meet the standards listed in: i5A NCAC 02B .0208 Standards for Toxic Substances and Temperature (a)(2)(ii). An effluent sampling plan will be prepared for this project to monitor the effluent at the discharge and/or mixing zone. Water quality monitoring results will be provided to the Corps. Minimal trees/vegetation are anticipated to be removed. The dredged material will not be placed within the wetlands; therefore the wetlands around the disposal area will not be permanently impacted. Efforts will be made to avoid temporary wetland impacts to the greatest extent possible by selecting a feasible temporary pipeline and equipment crossing location in an area with no delineated wetlands. Timber crane mats will be temporarily placed in the location where the pipe crosses the land adjacent to the CDF to allow construction equipment to cross. If any wetlands are temporarily impacted, they will be restored to the original condition. No equipment will be placed in riparian or wetland areas and no work will occur in these areas. ATM r. ■ 1 North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of CoastalManagement Major Permit Application Section 18—Letter of Permission CAMA MAJOR PERMIT APPLICATION SECTION 18 - LETTER OF PERMISSION As requested on Form DCM MP-2, a letter from the property owner granting permission for National Gypsum to dispose of the dredge material at their property is included in this section. J .ado the COASTAL COMPANIES NC Division of Coastal Management Department of Environmental Quality 127 Cardinal Drive Ext Wilmington, NC 28405 Subject: Letter of Permission Parcel No. 05900006 in Brunswick County To Whom it May Concern: October 21, 2020 BLT Trust, the owner of Parcel No. 0,5900006 in Brunswick County, hereby grants permission to National Gypsum Company to apply for all required federal, state and local permits necessary to place approximately 11,000 cubic yards of dredged material from National Gypsum's berthing area on the subject parcel. Once all permits are obtained, BLT Trust and National Gypsum Company will enter into a contract on mutually acceptable terms that allows for the placement of dredged materials on the parcel. BLT. Trust u/a/d I3I OCEAN BOULEVARD WEST HOLDEN BEACH, NC 28462 www.thecoastalcompanies.com a' North Carolina Department ofEnvironmentat Quality ,`,M Division of Coasts! Management LY Major PermitApplication cc Section 19 —USAGE ENG FORMOPM433455 � -J D URBAn■ CAMA MAJOR PERMIT APPLICATION SECTION 19 - USACE ENG FORM 4345 The completed USACE Application for Department of the Army Permit (Eng Form 4345) is included in this section. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) Form approved - APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT OMB No. 0710-0003 33 CFR 325. The proponent agency is CECW-CO-R. Expires: 01-09-2018 The public reporting burden for this collection of Information, OMB Control Number 0710-0003, is estimated to average 11 hours per response, Including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or burden reduction suggestions to the Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, at whs mcatex esd mbx dd-dN..Infotmatinn-collectjons@mail mil. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision or law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for falling to comply with a collection of information if It does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR APPLICATION TO THE ABOVE EMAIL. PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Ad, Section 10, 33 USC 403: Clean Water Act. Section 404, 33 USC 1344: Marine Protection. Research, and Sanctuaries Act, Section 103. 33 USC 1413; Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers: Final Rule 33 CFR 320-332. Principal Purpose: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit. Routine Uses: This Information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by Federal law, Submission of requested Information Is voluntary. however, if Information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor ran a permit be Issued. One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this application (see sample drawings and/or Instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned. System of Record Notice (BORN). The information received is entered into our permit tracking database and a SORN has been completed (BORN #A1145b) and may be accessed at the following website: hup:pdpcld defense gov1P!Ivacyt$ORNslndox/DOD-wlde,SORN:Allicle-View/AtliUe/57g1,151a1145b,Ge aspx OTEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS) 1. APPLICATION NO. 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED 4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETE (ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BYAPPLICANT) 5. APPLICANTS NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENTS NAME AND TITLE (agent is not required) First-Meghan Middle- Last - Zehringer First - Jennifer Middle-L Last - Waters Company- National Gypsum Company Company - Urban Engineers, Inc. E-mail Address-MeghanZ@NationalGypsum.com E-mail Address-jlwaters@urbanengineers.com 6. APPLICANTS ADDRESS: 9. AGENTS ADDRESS: Address- 2001 Rexford Road Address- 530 Walnut Street City- Charlotte State- NC Zip- 2821I Country -USA City- Philadelphia Stale- PA Zip- 19106 Country -USA 7. APPLICANTS PHONE NOs. w/AREA CODE 10. AGENTS PHONE NOs. WARFA CODE a. Residence b. Business c. Fax a. Residence b. Business c. Fax 704-365-7316 215-284-3125 215-922-8091 x 1292 215-922-8082 STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION 11. t hereby authorize, Jenniler Walers to act in my behalf as my agent In the processing of this application and to fumish; upon request; information in support of this supplemental inforpermit application. IsSEPLo NATURE OF APPLICANT A7� NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY 12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see Instructions) National Gypsum Wilmington Maintenance Dredging 13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if applicable) 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable) Cape Fear River Address 83S Sunnyvale Drive 15. LOCATION OF PROJECT Latitude:•N 341076.27" Longitude: •W-7757'25.83" City- Wilmington Slate- NC ZIP- 28412 16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see instructions) State Tax ParmllD R06400-001-002-000 Municipality Wilmington Section- Township- Range- ENG FORM 4345, MAY 2018 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE, Page 1 of 3 17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE From the City of Wilmington: I. Take 421 South to 117 West 2. Take 117 to River Road 3. Make a left onto Sunnyvale Drive 4. National Gypsum's property is on the left. 18. Nature of Activity (Description of project, Include all features) The proposed project includes maintenance dredging at National Gypsum's Wilmington commercial berth facility to a depth of-36' MLW (-12,000 cubic yards of material) and -2 feet overdredge (-5,000 cubic yards of material) in order to continue National Gypsum's operations at their Wilmington Facility. This project consists of dredging approximately 17,000 cubic yards of silt, clay, and sand from the navigable waters of the United States. The dredge material will be disposed at a private confined disposal facility (CDF) located in Brunswick County (Parcel No. 05900006) at approximately 34.176788 N,-77.463510 W, which is directly across the river from the proposed maintenance dredging ores. This project is considered maintenance dredging since the berthingarea was dredged in the past. The proposed maintenance dredging will be performed via hydraulic dredging (cutter suction dredge) and mechanical dredging. Refer to the attached Project Narrative for more details. 19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project; see Instructions) Maintenance dredging is imperative at the National Gypsum Wilmington facility in order for National Gypsum to continue their operations in this region. This area has not been dredged since at least the early 2000s and therefore there is a significant need to deepen the berthing area to ensure the safe passage of ships and to accommodate the ships required for National Gypsum to receive gypsum shipments. If berthing area is not dredged, this will lead to significant financial implications for National Gypsum and ultimately impact the local economy. The proposed dredging is anticipated to occur in 2021. The proposed dredging will not change the use of the site. USE BLOCKS 20.231F DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO. BE DISCHARGED 20, Reason(s) for Discharge ` The dredge material is required to be removed in order for National Gypsum to receive gypsum shipments and ultimately continue their operations in the area. 21, Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type In Cubic Yards: Type Type Type Amount in Cubic Yards Amount In Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards 17,000 (sand, silt, clay) 22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see Instructions) Acres 0 or Linear Feet 0 23. Description of Avoidance, Minimization, and Compensation (see Instructions) Refer to Section 17 for the avoidance and minimization measures: r ENG FORM 4345, MAY 2018 1 Page 2 of 3 24. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes ®Nu IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK I 25. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Properly Adjoins the Waterbody lnme. s neaeentar mse.plena ane ea nwereeewwn. a. Address- Kinder Morgan Terminals Wilmington LLC, 3340 River Road City- Wilmington State - NC Zip -28412 b. Address- Port Cape Fear Associates, LLC, 3410 River Road City- Wilmington State - NC Zip -28412 c. Address - city - State - Zip - d. Address - city - State - Zip - e. Address. City - State - Zip - 26. Ust of Other Certificates or Approvals/Denials received: from other Federal, State, or Loral Agencies for Work. Described In This Application. AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL' IDENTIFICATION DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED NUMBER NCDCM DCM Major Permit 102-94 7/5194 9/14f94 NA NCDCM DCM Major Perm it 102-94 118198 2/18/99 NA ACOE DepL Of Army Perm 199403672 7/5/94 7114/94 NA NCDCM DCM Major Permit 102-94 9116/03 11/17/03 NA 'Would include but Is not restricted to zoning, building,. and flood plain permits 27. Application Is hereby made for permit or permits to authorize the work described In this application. I certify that this Information In this application is complete and accurate.. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent of the applicant. —57 1t5 P 20 /4- � 2020-08-21 S RE OF APPLICANT CAFE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE The Application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly authorized agent If the statement In block 11 has been filled out and signed. 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, In any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fad or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both; ENG FORM 4345, MAY 2016 Page 3 of 3 North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality. ` ry� Division of Coastal Management Major Permit Application LL Section 20—Navigation Plan uRBan■ CAMA MAJOR PERMIT APPLICATION SECTION 20 — Navigation Plan National Gypsum Wilmington Maintenance Dredging Temporary Navigation Plan during Maintenance Dredging A hydraulic dredging disposal pipeline will be in place between National Gypsum's berthing area and the upland confined disposal river (CDF), located directly across Cape Fear River, for approximately 2 weeks. In order to accommodate passing vessels, this Temporary Navigation Plan was prepared. A floating pipeline will be kept in place by temporary land anchors at each end and weight will be used throughout its floating length to anchor it to the mudline. The weights will be connected to floating marker buoys, and will be heavy enough to anchorthe pipeline in place while allowing it to be moved by a tug. The marker buoys will conform to US Coast Guard (USCG) signaling requirements, and will have colored lights in accordance with 33 CFR 88.15. In advance of vessel transit, and whenever dredging operations are temporarily suspended, the floating pipeline will be broken, and the section in the channel will be moved by a tug to clear the channel for navigation. A notice will be distributed to mariners and the USCG ahead of the dredging event, and the pipeline location will be continuously monitored by the dredge contractor. Space will be left available between the dredge and the dock for tugs and other small craft to pass during dredging operations. Standard colored navigation markers will be in place on the dredge and pipeline to direct mariners to the available passing area. National Gypsum Wilmington i Biological Assessment National Gypsum Wilmington Maintenance Dredging Project July 2020 ,\IURBAn Urban Engineers, Inc. Philadelphia, PA I b 0 C) y N rn 0 W Oo 0 0 0 NGC WILMINGTON DREDGING o� €o � z m X �doNOo -> 1 ve°e _aae /l ci N Mo ,IURBRn z c� ]10W0NW PA 19106]d]B 1 COVERSHEET BY II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I� I I I I I I I I I I I GENERAL NOTES STRUCTURAL AND MISCELLANEOUS STEEL 1. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL 1. ALL STEEL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF CODES AND STANDARDS, THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. AND DRAWINGS. NOTES ON AISC SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE DESIGN, FABRICATION AND ERECTION OF STRUCTURAL STEEL. DRAWINGS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. SPECIFIC NOTES DESIGN, FABRICATION, AND ERECTION ARE TO BE GOVERNED BY THE LATEST REVISIONS OF: ON DETAIL DRAWINGS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER GENERAL NOTE DRAWINGS. STATE AND A. AISC STEEL CONSTRUCTION MANUAL LOCAL CODES SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS AND NOTES B. AISC CODE OF STANDARD PRACTICE ON DRAWINGS. C. AWS D1.1 STRUCTURAL WELDING CODE D. RCSC SPECIFICATIONS FOR STRUCTURAL JOINTS USING HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO MOBILIZING. ALL EXISTING & PROPOSED DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO ANY FABRICATION OR ERECTION. NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES IMMEDIATELY. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE FROM THE SITE ALL WASTE MATERIAL, DEMOLISHED MATERIAL AND DEBRIS GENERATED DURING THE COURSE OF THE WORK, U.N.O. DISPOSAL OF ALL GENERATED WASTE MATERIAL, DEMOLISHED MATERIAL AND DEBRIS IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. DISPOSE OF ALL MATERIAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL RULES AND REGULATIONS. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES, BOOMS, TARPAULINS, FLOATS, STAGING, TURBIDITY BARRIERS, AND OTHER DEVICES AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS FROM ENTERING THE WATER AND LEAVING THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF THE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANUP OF ALL MATERIALS. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ABIDE BY ALL APPLICABLE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION STANDARDS, CODES, LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND PERMITS. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONDUCT HIS OPERATIONS SO AS TO NOT INTERFERE WITH, OR BE DETRIMENTAL TO, VESSEL AND VEHICULAR TRAFFIC DURING THE COURSE OF THE WORK. 7. ALL STRUCTURES ARE DESIGNED TO BE SELF-SUPPORTING AND STABLE AFTER ERECTION IS FULLY COMPLETE. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE ERECTION PROCEDURES AND SEQUENCE AND TO ENSURE THE SAFETY OF THE STRUCTURE AND ITS COMPONENT PARTS DURING ERECTION. THIS INCLUDES THE ADDITION OF WHATEVER SHORING, SHEETING, TEMPORARY BRACING, GUYS OR TIE DOWNS THAT MAY BE NECESSARY. SUCH MATERIAL SHALL REMAIN THE CONTRACTOR'S PROPERTY AFTER COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW ALL APPLICABLE SAFETY CODES AND REGULATIONS DURING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. CONCRETE AND REINFORCING STEEL 1. ALL CONCRETE WORK SHALLCOMPLYWITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF ACI 301 AND ACI 318, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 2. FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS OF ACI 306 WHEN POURING CONCRETE IN COLD WEATHER. 3. CAST -IN -PLACE CONCRETE STRENGTH SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4500 PSI AT 28 DAYS, U.N.O. 4. NONMETALLIC NON -SHRINK GROUT STRENGTH SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 5000 PSI AT 28 DAYS, U.N.O. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN PROPER CURING PROCEDURES FOR A MINIMUM OF 7 DAYS. 6. ALL DETAILING, FABRICATION AND ERECTION OF REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO THE ACI MANUAL OF STANDARD PRACTICE FOR DETAILING REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES, ACI 315. - 7. REINFORCING STEEL FOR CAST -IN -PLACE CONCRETE SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A 615, GR 60, EXCEPT REINFORCING STEEL TO BE WELDED SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A 706. B. MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER FOR ALL REINFORCING SHALL BE 2 INCHES, U.N.O. 9. ALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS SHALL BE KEYED, U.N.O. JOINTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AS NECESSARY AT LOCATIONS, AND USING METHODS, APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 10. ALL REINFORCING BAR SPLICES SHALL BE TENSION LAP SPLICES, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 318, U.N.O. 11. CHAMFER ALL EXTERNAL EXPOSED CORNERS OF CONCRETE WITH A 1 INCH, 45-DEGREE CHAMFER, U.N.O. 12. WELDING OF REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWS D1.4. 2. STRUCTURAL AND MISCELLANEOUS STEEL MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING, U.N.O.: WIDE FLANGE SHAPES: ASTM A 992. GRADE 50 HP PILES: ASTM A 572, GRADE 50 PIPE PILES: ASTM A 252. GRADE 3, Fy = 50 KSI PIPE: ASTM A 53. GRADE B. TYPE S HOLLOW STRUCTURAL SECTIONS (HSS): ASTM A 500 OTHER SHAPES, BARS AND PLATES: ASTM A 36, Fy = 36 KSI HEADED BOLTS: ASTM A 325 ANCHOR BOLTS: ASTM A 449 STEEL SHEET PILE (SSP): ASTM A 572, GRADE 50 NUTS: ASTM A 563 WASHERS: ASTM F 436 3. IF OVERSIZED HOLES ARE USED, WASHERS MUST BE EXTRA THICK, AND MAY REQUIRE WELDING. 4. ALL MISCELLANEOUS METALS INCLUDING BOLTS, WASHERS, NUTS, ANGLES, INSERTS, PLATES. AND OTHER FABRICATIONS SHALL BE HOT -DIP GALVANIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM A 123 AND/OR ASTM A 153, AS APPLICABLE AFTER FABRICATION, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR SPECIFIED. STAINLESS STEEL ITEMS SHALL NOT BE GALVANIZED. 5. FIELD TREAT DAMAGED GALVANIZED FINISH WITH TWO COATS OF HIGH ZINC DUST OXIDE PAINT, COLD GALVANIZING COMPOUNDS OR APPROVED EQUAL. IN ADDITION, ALL EXPOSED THREADED SURFACES SHALL BE CLEANED AND PAINTED WITH TWO COATS OF HIGH ZINC DUST OXIDE PAINT AFTER INSTALLATION OF THE NUT(S). 6. THE TYPE, SIZE, SPACING, AND ALIGNMENT OF CONNECTING HARDWARE SHOWN ARE CRITICAL AND MUST BE MAINTAINED. 7. ALL WELDING SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST EDITION OF AWS D.1.1, U.N.O. ALL WELDS SHALL BE MADE WITH E70XX ELECTRODES, UNLESS HIGHER STRENGTH ELECTRODES ARE REQUIRED BY AWS DIA. GENERALLY, ELECTRODES SHALL BE NEW OR BAKED AT THE START OF EACH SHIFT. FOLLOW THE ATMOSPHERIC EXPOSURE LIMITS AND BAKING REQUIREMENTS OF CLAUSE 5 OF AWS D1.1. 8. WELDING PERSONNEL AND PROCEDURES ARE TO BE QUALIFIED PER AWS D1.1, U.N.O. 9. MINIMUM SIZE OF FILLET WELDS SHALL BE W U.N.O. 10. WHEN. THE 'ALL-AROUND' WELDING SYMBOL IS USED. AT AN END CONNECTION. OF.A ROLLED SHAPE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TERMINATE THE WELD AT EACH OF THE FLANGE EDGES, AND ONE WELD THICKNESS AWAY FROM .EACH INTERSECTION OF THE WEB AND FLANGE, U.N.O. 11. DOWELS. BOLTS, REINFORCEMENT OR OTHER STEEL TO BE EMBEDDED IN CONCRETE SHALL BE INSTALLED USING HILT] HIT-HY 200 EPDXY, U.N.O. REBAR TABLE MIN. LAP SPLICE MIN. DEVELOPMENT LENGTH BAR SIZE TOP BAR (INCHES) OTHER BAR (INCHES) TOP BAR (INCHES) OTHER BAR (INCHES) #4 19 16 15 12 #5 24 19 19 14 #6 29 22 - 22 17 #7 42 32 32 25 #8 48 37 37 28 #9 60 46 46 35 #10 74 57 57 44 #11 88 68 68 52 LEGEND: X SHEET WHERE SECTION IS DRAWN SHEET "ME ELEVATION OR DETAIL 6 DRAWN X ELEVATION DETAIL SECTION LETTER INDICATING SECTION AND EUNATIDN DESIGNATION OR NUMBER INDICATION DUAL DESIGNATION TITLE SHEET WHERE SECTION OR DUAL �IS DRAWN SHEET WHERE SECTION OR DETAIL IS TPHEN SECONN/DETAIL TIRE CIVIL/STRUCTURAL ABBREVIATIONS. U.N.O AASHIO = AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY LT = LONG TON AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS m = METERS ACI = AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE mm = MILLIMETERS AISC = AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF MAX = MAXIMUM STEEL CONSTRUCTION MEA = MEASURED ALT = ALTERNATE MHHW = MEAN HIGHER HIGH WATER ANSI = AMERICAN NATIONAL MHW = MEAN HIGH WATER STANDARDS INSTITUTE MIN = MINIMUM APPROX = APPROXIMATE MISC = MISCELLANEOUS ARCH. = ARCHITECTURAL MLLW = MEAN LOWER LOW WATER ASTM = AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR MLW = MEAN LOW WATER TESTING AND MATERIALS MPa = MEGAPASCALS AVG = AVERAGE MPH = MILES PER HOUR AWS = AMERICAN WELDING SOCIETY MSL = MEAN SEA LEVEL B.O.P. = BOTTOM OF PIPE N = NEWTON OR NORTH 8/8 = BACK TO BACK RAVD-88 = NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL C/C = CENTER TO CENTER DATUM OF 1988 CF = CUBIC FEET NGVD-29 = NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL C.I.P. = CAST IN PLACE DATUM OF 1929 CJ = CONSTRUCTION JOINT NTP = NOTICE TO PROCEED CUR = CLEAR NIC = NOT IN CONTRACT CO = CLEAN OUT NS = NEAR SIDE CONC = CONCRETE NTS = NOT TO SCALE CONST = CONSTRUCTION NO. = NUMBER CONT = CONTINUOUS O.C. = ON CENTER GTE = COAL TAR EPDXY O/S = OUTSHORE CY = CUBIC YARD OSHA = OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND D = DEPTH HEALTH ADMINISTRATION D/R = DOWNRNER PSI = POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH DEG = DEGREES PVC = POLYVINYL CHLORIDE DELLS = DETAILS R/F = REINFORCING DIA = DIAMETER R.C.P. = REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE DIST = DISTANCE REQ'D = REQUIRED DWG = DRAWING S = SOUTH DWI = DEAD WEIGHT TONNAGE SCH = SCHEDULE E = EAST SECT = SECTION EA = EACH SHT = SHEET EF = EACH FACE SIM = SIMILAR EHW = EXTREME HIGH WATER SPEC = SPECIFICATION EJ = EXPANSION JOINT SQ = SQUARE EL/ELEV. = ELEVATION SS = STAINLESS STEEL ELEC = ELECTRICAL SSP = STEEL SHEET PILE EW = EACH WAY STL = STEEL EXIST. = EXISTING STRUC. = STRUCTURE EXT = EXTERIOR SUPP = SUPPORT EXPN = EXPANSION SY = SQUARE YARD TON. = FOUNDATION T, TONNE = METRIC TON FPS = FEET PER SECOND TON = SHORT TON FRP = FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC T.B.D = TO BE DETERMINED FS = FAR SIDE TEMP = TEMPORARY FT = FEET THK = THICKNESS FY S SS - YIELD STRES THRU = THROUGH GALV = GALVANIZED - GR = GRADE .O-TOP-0 TO = TOP OF CONCRETE GRTNG= GRATING T.OS .S = TOP OF STEEL CUSS BUSS = GUSSET = TYPICAL H = HHEIGHTGHEIGHTLIN U.N.O. = UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE HAT = HIGHEST ASTRONOMICAL TIDE UHMWPE = ULTRA HIGH MOLECULAR WEIGHT HTL = HIGH TIDE LINE POLYETHYLENE HVY = HEAVY U/R = UP RIVER I = I BEAM USACE = 'UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS I/S = INSHORE OF ENGINEERS INV = INVERT W/ = WITH JT = JOINT W = WIDTH, WIDE FLANGE BEAM OR WEST kg = KILOGRAMS W.P./WP = WORK POINT KIP = KILOPOUND W.T. = WALL THICKNESS kN = KILONEWTONS MIT = WEIGHT L = ANGLE CE = CENTER LINE AT = LOWEST ASTRONOMICAL TIDE OR # = NUMBER LATITUDE 2 = PERCENT LB = POUND R = PLATE LF = LINEAR FEET & = AND ,LG = LONG 0 = AT LLV = LONG LEG VERTICAL x = BY LOA = LENGTH OVERALL 0 = DIAMETER LONG. = LONGITUDE ELEVATIONS: +9.00' TEEMMAA 100 YR. FLOOD +1 93' MEAN HIGH HIGH TER QvIHW)(MHHW) +O.OD' NAVD-88 -1.00' NGVD-29{y 2.60• ( L MEM WATMTRW)(MLLW) LOW LOW (NOT TO SCALE) ISSUED FOR PERMfT DATE 11 /23/20 Cm TW .W mz mo mW iI sr. wre I 1 _ I � I I I I I I e i z c� w N � F [] O O z 0 Z_ W � w � LD i CJ o z 5 AS NOTED lil=20 . 20166103&5.000 - GN-1 �. 1 7 GN-1 GEN....DWG I 0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 21 _� WEIR STRUCNRES P-MUNG DREDGE DISPOSLL PRELIM WRH MARKER BUOYS. ANCHORED TO RNERBED (SEE NOTES) 0 I OVERALL SITE PLAI 0 2w 00' PREONES GA-4 PPPRO%. SHORELINE C A P E F E A R R I V E R .^ EDO FLOOD) 1 DREDGING AREA I 1 NOTES L TILE DREDGER SHALL PREPARE MD SUBMIT A TEMPORARY NAMMN=N PW TO THE OWNER MD THE US COAST GUARD PRIOR TO MOBIUnTION. THE DREDGE PU SH IDENOFY HOW THE PIPELINE WILL BE INSTALLED MD MANAGED, MD HOW SATE NANGKIDON WILL BE PROMDED MR SMALL CRAB AND IARGE V SSELS. 2PRIOR TO MOBIUMON, THE DREDGER SHALL SUBMIT NbTIF.=ON OF THE PROPOSED WORK MD NAVIGATION PLW TO THE LOCAL MMINERS ADMSORY COMMITTEE AND US COAST GUARD. I 3. WE FLOATING PIPELINE SHALL BE ANCHORED BY TEMPORARY VMD ANCHORS AT EACH END AND ANCHOR WEIGHTS THROUGHOUT ITS LENGTH. MCHOR WEIGHPS SHALL BE OF SUFOVENT WEIGHT TO KEEP THE PREUNE IN PUCE. BUT SHALL ALLOW FOR A TUG TO MOVE WE PIPELINE WHEN NEEDED. 5. MARKER BUOYS SHALL CONFORM TO USCG SIGN 4MNG REQUIREMENTS. MD WILL BE EQUIPPED WITH COLORED LIGHTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH 33 CM B8.15. STANDARD COLORED NAMGMON MMKERS WILL BE WFXED TO THE DREDGE MD PIPELINE ENDS TO SIGNAL TO NIMMERS THAT SAFE PASSAGE IS AVNU UE BEPWEEN THE DREDGE MD THE DOCK. 6. INIADVMCE OF VESSEL T NSR, MD WHENEVER DREDGING OPERADONS ME NOT ONGOING, THE DREDGER SHALL BREAK THE FLOATING PIPELINE MD REPOSMON IT OUT OF ,THE CHMNEL BY TUG. 1 1 v 1 1 1 1 1 1 MPRO%. SHORWA ISSUED FOR 11 11 PERMIT 1 DATE 11 /23/20 1 C11MA W W mo �i W 1onnn Z U' Z O S � a o w r J Z � W � O u CO j Z F AS NOTED lk320 R �2018610385.000 - GA-1 4 GA-0 OVE....DWG II ' -411 s C Y� P E FEAR `2 I V E R� -, -. « -.,, - —1 2 a. EBBS IHLOOD , M1 -,xo - y - - - i ..RB.MATE Se 6GE C£-»t CH.VW6_v.e -». _ _ _ _... sae - _ - e m F _, 4 , ,i • - �\ q �TI — —\ N6i31'R3'E —Jea3r OOOS ITBTAL �Rd ,S J"-zmJa 1 _ 4 its IT , S IT JSil '. tee 9fFE .. ' :sls _ SLOPE ..is _ _is %l_`� DREDGING PLAN NOTES: LEGEND: lGki 0 <0d0 1. NOTE THAT SURVEY ELEVADONS MATERVL TO BE G-I —180 11 IN MAW DATUM. REFER TO THE LEGEND ON GN-1 M. REM TO ® REMOVED FROM SIDE FOR A CONVERSIONNAV TO D88. SLOPES 2. DREDGING SHALL BE PERFORMED HYDMUCILLY. M IERIPL TO BE EXCAVATORS CPN BE USED FROM THE BARGE DECK REMOVED IN DREDGE TO REMOVE LARGE DEBRIS. SUCH AS BURIED WIN TOE FOOTPRINT WBER DEBRIS. THIS DEBRIS WKL BE DISPOSED OF AT THE CDF. v son �H d Own —411 mZ =Z Fri —Is SOL «z HANNEL DESIGN TEMPLATE wre I I SUM xe ESTIMATED DREDGE VOLUME (cu. yd. EASED ON 2020/05/26 SURVEY) ZONE 36' (MLW) TOE 2' OVERDREDGE DREDGE 80% Q2T.8 2030.3 SLOPE 3A 7075.7 3045.9 TOTAL 11800.5 B.OTB.0 NOTE THAT ACTUAL VOLUMES AT THE TIME OF DREDGING MAY BE SUCHTLY DIFFERENT TMAN EBRMATED HERE. ISSUED FOR PERMff DATE 11 /23/20 J 0 (7 K 0 GA-20RE....DWG �J AM ✓� DREDGER SHALL JAY4� TEMPCRAZY TIMBER i'rfi T MATS UP-SLQPE FOR EQUIPMENT ACCEES� A AND DISPOSAL PIPELINE ��� VAR MINIMIZE IMPACTS yl TO ANY WETIANpS, j BERM \ 0. _ Wv. F20 P PROV%iMATE MFAu I FROD TER LINE Z. G.A o OASTAL ST.PEJNE BUFFER 10T-12" DIAMETER DISPOSAL PIPELINE LAID ON RIVERBED ALONG BANK TO HYDRAULIC DREDGE LEGEND IRS CONTROL POINT MB MAP BOOM PG PAGE N,E HO'!1/TOR4ERLV COP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE INV, a INVERT EL. ELEVATION - WDCOswE m - WETLAND RAG TINE CBE AREA (LOCATION OF PROPOSED SPOIL RRGEMENp 'MLUAM E. SFUNOERS. IL "AS E \ OF THE IALT EE0 BOOXTRUSTIS ] /P GE 13APRIL 23 200V 1rN Md IS CGNO LNG6YN11 ' PG J3 / IL .GRID PIN/ ED 1G 0-95-9fi<2 / 931 SITGRIO n a r !�A POTENTIAL PIPE OUTLET (SEE NOTES) ( L y� 1 'iy� I j�FxV4 S _ MP E LINE EOV W NPNO�R CNTMi CAPE FEAR RIVER C A P E F E A R R I V E R EBB FLOOD rlr DISPOSAL PLAN \CA-4 0 16' 32' 64 Ct-I %%� ISSUED FOR PERMff DATE= 11 /23 /20 NOTES T. THE DREDGER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OPERATING THE CDT DURING DISPOSAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL LOCAL STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS AND PERMITS- IN SO DOING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE MATERIAL INFLOW POINT, WEIR ELEVATION, AND CDT GRADING DURING DREDGING TO PROMOTE PROPER DRAINAGE. 2. THE DISPOSAL SITE HAS PREVIOUSLY BEEN USED AS A COT AND THE TOP CRUST OF MATERIAL MAY NOT SUPPORT THE WEIGHT OF EQUIPMENT; USE CAUTION AND REINFORCE OR USE MATS AS NEEDED FOR OPERATIONS, 3. THE DREDGER SHALL MODIFY, REPAIR MD MAINTAIN THE EXISTING WEIR STRUCTGFES AS NEEDED TO OPERATE THE CDF IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL PERMITS. 6_ THE DREDGER SHALL REGRADE THE INTERIOR OF THE COT AS NEEDED TO MI THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE INFLOW POINT AND THE WEIR AN OPERATE THE DISPOSAL FACWTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL PERMITS, NO EXCAVATION SHALL BE MADE BELOW ANY IMPERVIOUS OR 'EMI -PERVIOUS LATER_ NO EXCAVA➢ON SHALL BE MADE OUTSIDE OF THE BERM, 5. ALL EQUIPMENT AND PIPELINE ACCESS TO THE SITE WILL BE BY WATER, VIA TIMBER MATS, AS SHOWN. 5. NA➢I GYPSUM COMPANY WILL ENGAGE A THIRD PARTY TO MONITOR THE EGG UEM DURING DREDGING. SAMPLING AND TESTING TO RECORD CONS TIT�ENi LEVELS THE DREDGER SHALL MONITOR THE DISPOSAL AND EFFLUENT LEVELS. AND REGULATE THE FLOW RATE TO AVOID OVERTOPPING OF THE CDF BERMS AND TO MAINTAIN EFFLUENT LEVELS WNPH ACCEPTABLE LIMITS. PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL FILTRATION SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED IF TESTING DEMONSTRATES ITS NEED. ]. THE DREDGER SHALL ADJUST THE RATE OF DREDGING TO PREVENT EXCEEDENCE OF REGULATED EFFLUENTS AND. TO PREVENT DISPOSED MATERIAL AND WATER FROM REACHING WITHIN T FOOT OF THE BERM, WHETHER DUE TO DISPOSAL OR STORMWATER. S. THE DREDGER SHALL PREVENT EXCESSIVE FORCING THAT COULD LEAD TO GROUNDWATER MIGRATION, IT IS ASSUMED THAT THE EXISTING CDT WAS PROPERLY DESIGNED TO PREVENT LEACHING INTO GROUNDWATER. 9. ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH NCAC STANDARDS H 99 � W ME (co :3W /I B: DOE E====E GA-4 O .DWG 0 W �z4 2�� u iT� 9 i Ti iTTi{iia3i,iiTR�Tia^2aT�daaaaaa=�,],,,.`R; aa gg Tdi?iTs!i?iss9^i,{^;i{$17{T17yi=;TT?T99SST$sSdisM' .iisAaa" .Specs _naa$ _ sa^$a" aae:: a y #id;a$jaTTi..... TAdaTvTT9Tssi$ilys{{a49s{ aj{$ a{"A$'P ds=asaa a 2 a 4sa i _ a?TaTaTaafa9a??1{?$a{{s T-{s5t{iT{des T$9.j?gsq 1;,n TTTT?.TTTT ' P Q J s 3:1TaSi{i.TT2.'T 1. Tao ^jaa$SS..SSTs?T?saTg$s$ aaisssgsaaa mx FSF' daa __!?'; "e aeaae84; £!$$f9s"SaaTTaasii{sT'i,Ts4g{{r?�T T${a,?a��iiTTss{RF" a"9eAaai„ a9a15Ii.' ;5741' 0 Tis1:11T�j{T{{TjTTT?ii,:dlMTTTTi '?s{{aaRRda ]�r„s'p 99ay _5_ ", 99"E ^e_22 `e_ 77 aaa$a$TT$$a "si4TT4$$aaT4 �9 aTaatlTTT a3aaaa aT s.,. 9P :aa i a i it "y aae 4a?43 ".i.... s....... .TT... IITTld#3 SIT Ta:aRpas "A T "diaTTa3?a$" a$ cc T as "6 {, °ST. fi ,Tii..TaTTTpaTaT?i37{pa^3aza�ga a 17T?afi?9?iTdaa;T?Tac�$BaTTspT?3TiT7T 2 a xq 55 E $jjss$aaii9{�d4a49{99 Taid{Ysi{{TaTi{{?tT p?TT?a$aai?c54{4iT44iyi9??T?49?�?�}?ij{�rT'TiTT939 iiiii5?ia�TBaaciiiiisiiTTTTTii9? TT$e"sa$F$ R asa:Y3aaiY^ad"dA"^y°aa••-- us , i i i t 1*iiPiTii$"{TTiT a;?a$TT {Ti9kaaa - _. aa.»aaaaaa$ea$ao, ea »Po $ a$ dasT j."., i _.%- { aT"^. i dTyaaa4ad .9{91 FAa kq Aq „ _ , ,;aaa _ flSP p P S I N $aa$$$aT j$Ti I..... 6adTTd{$". aaaTi{{as{9a oP ono r� P.Po PP $$Ta, .aTiaa a$;T$dTaTaTdisTTa $Td3T,i._$aa%:_ aaa.??...sa. sp,.liy is5 i55i;;iii�i4 a"a=,;.al-ca?"e7daagq „ pal 59a A�3399 a^aaad a aa_ a aPY4Y"S$ $4aifiYTj :"^,"".^.aoaT$aa$$ai$Ti$$$d d$T x c$ 9aaatl ^.aanyaad$^p4"""'i'?q 2 asa _aa". 3 0 ,• National Gypsum Company Maintenance Dredging 838 Sunnyvale Drive Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina Terracon Project No. ES197346 Id1:1 Iq 47W-Ia pi I PI IR a EFYiu t�lq ME 9a 14H I Lai tom. D D-7 Du'licate' D 1 Tri `1�cate ,D-5 < EPA ., * _ e.r lndustnali `: '>NCDEQ PSRG'-' EPA Method`,` , , ?nits _ , Mal e« Yt.: Sediment n:., ..p ., Sediment .,s .,P. Sediment, Sediment' x, . a .Sediment Sediment Sediment <',ESY . ERL ERM; Commerctit- k Protection of GV1F _ r. , , c Heaith Based ' SM 6020A mg/kg Arsenic 15.4 13.1 16.9 14.3 13.5 12.4 8.9 7.24 8.2 70 3.0 5.8 (Metals) rrg/kg Banuni= s . 33i,9 30.6` 2 422 35.5 �" =,25:7 25.7 22.2,< - 47;000 580a:,';•) mg/kg Berylium 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.1 0.91 0.87 0.67 470 63 „Cadmium. " 0.35 0:31. 0.40 „037=,,'�'; 0.320.28 - '. 0:26 ',0.68 , 1.2 9.6 ;200 3:0� mg/kg Chromium 40.8 34.4 42.0 41.3 30.8 32.2 26.2 52.3 81 370 350,000 360,000 m9�9.',d, :• Cobalt,; 9.2 ° �.,. 80 -!, 8;5, , 8:3 °" 6.7 6:6 . 5<:4 , 70 0.90` mg/kg Copper 16.4 14.7 16.5 16.1 12.4 13.3 12.3 18.7 34 270 9,300 700 mg/kg i „' ,Lead ,`` ' .' 202 19.2; '` - � 21•.6 _ • 23.9 `` 16.3 `. .21.8; ° 176 '.' 30.2 " -46.7 ;218;,' 800 270' mg/kg Nickel 12.9 11.1 13.4 12.4 9.6 9.4 8.0 15.9 20.9 51.6 4,700 130 mg/kg ;' Vanadium . 61.8 g 50 2 t 65:0 56 6' ' . 44.9 r' 44.,6> 33 7 - „ ..=1,200 850 mg/kg Zinc 84.5 78.6 88.7 81.3 65.8 69.4 56.2 124 150 410 70,000 1,200 mglkg • =P Mercury $ 0.090� 0 11 r 0.13 019 0 087 `- 0 14 _ 0.71 0.13 0 15" ' = 0.71 9 7 1 0t (Mercury) SM 8260D mg/kg Acetone < 10.4 NA NA < 0.325 0.354 < 0.289 < 0.306 140,000 25 (Volatile Organics) - - - -- - - LloydKahn '-mg/kg. * :Total'OrganicCartion=Mean _ �: =48,400 w=-51,400, t50,300 `. °",�42,600, "40;300 ;. 37,500'= • 36;700 - SM 254OG JL-2/6- Percent Moisture 67.5 67.5 66.0 64.2 63.5 61.6 64.2 Notes: Only analytes with detections in at least one (1) sample are shown. All other analytes were below laboratory reporting limits. mg/kg - milligrams per kilogram < - Analyte was not detected above the laboratory reporting limit (RL) value shown. NA - Analyte not tested for EPA ESV - EPA Region 4 Hazardous Waste Section Ecological Screening Values ERL - NOAA Effects Range Low ERM - NOAA Effects Range Median NCDEQ PSRG - North Carolina DEQ Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (May 2019) - No regulatory standard has been established. 100 - Value exceeds at least one regulatory standard/screening level. Page 1 of 1 to E 40 LOT 41 LOT 42 LOT 43 BRUNSICCK COVE MAP CABINET U. PAGE 162 LOT LOT 45 LOT 4 LOT 3 LOT 2 GARL L wADCEU- OEEO BOOK 766, PAW 792 JOSEPH L WHITE Jr. DEED BOOK 76M PAGE 1001 EUGENE C. CARR DEED BOOK 894. PACE 242 MPFDN V. WRNON DEED BOOK 809, PAGE 501 EXXON PIPELINE CO. GEED BOOK 932. PAGE 335 EXSTNG 21 E'DE BEE OPTIC EASMENT DEED BOOK 769. PAGE 186 MAP CARNET S. PAGE 365 TOTALAREA = 1.Fi48 ACRE$Fi- TOTAL WETLAND AREA = 979 ACRES+/. -TOTAL UPLAND AREA = 69 ACRES+/�-TOTAL UPLAND ARE. = 69 ACRES+/ - v N.C. GRID NORTH NAD. 1983-01 EDGE OF MARSH AS LOCATED W NOVEMBER 2007 EDGE OF NpRSH \ AS LOCATED IN NOVEMBER 2007 e'9G R THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE- UNLESS THERE IS A CHANGE IN THE LAW, OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE. THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTILIZING THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLAND DELINEATION MANUAL VICOVRY MAP Jf1� _ - LEC00 REGULATORY OFFICIAL n I f O = CALCULATED POINT NOT SET TITLE' /lam _ O = EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT DATE: O = IRON PIPE FOUND USAGE ACTION ID: 0O = IRON ROD FOUND APPROXINIATE LOCATION OF UPLAND SPOIL DISPOSALAREA ,m UH-,AW ",P, MI5 efEF vTAC xm AB. BY / NA, SllFVEv. APPpoTM Of UMITs WNMm'M ATAIu PRoro.y AND .. rule s PIIAKEA 6r uRD MARkWAVIT IX+WP. 0 = IRON ROD SET O = EXISTING RAILROAD SPIKE T-L= TE-UNE . WETLAND HATCH Q ADJOINER PROPERTY UNE NOT SURVEYED Q 'pGHT=OF=WAY RI EM EASENT LINE �✓Z 7/ Cog i D QW UC BOUNDARY LINE .U\\II11111L. GAgO�'AA NOTES E55104;'-L �� 1. ALL BEARINGS ARE ORIENTED TO N.C. GRID NORTH. N.A.O. 1983, 2001 SEAL ADJUSTMENT. SCALE FACTOR - L-393T j 1.0000464. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORRONTAL GRID DISTANCES EXCEPT AS 3U=O NOTED. P �C 2. A PORTION OF THE PLATTED TRACTS APPEAR TO BE IN A FLOOD HAZARD NNI\\\\\ ZONE. 3. SURVEY MADE FROM DEED BOOK 2457. PAGE 474 AND MAP BOOK 15, PACE 32. 4. TOTAL AREA AS SHOWN ON THIS PUT = 1.048 ACRES +/—. 5. AREA CALCUUTED TO EDGE OF MARSH LOCATED NOVEMBER 2007 AND IS APPROXIMATE. 6. SEE SHUT S-5 FOR LINE AND CURVE TABLES ' Z. REVISED MAY 4, 2009 TO SHOW APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UPLAND SPOIL DISPOSAL AREA.\ 8. RENSED PER COMMENTS JUNE 15. 2009. DESCRIPTION REM90NS OWNER(S): BATE LAND AND TIMBER. LLC P.O. BOX 15345 NEW BERN. N.C. M61 CAPE FEAR Engineering, Inc. m»iwpe(tu.eryir�eWn9 mm ORA15N: SIE6GEI1 PRPFLi rWETLAND SURVEY FOR BATE LAND AND TIMBER, LLC GRAPHIC SCALE bD EAST TRACT TOWNCREEK TOWNSHIP BRUNSWICK COUNTY ( IN ]FEET) NORTH CAROUNA 1 i.h = 300 TL 8O8,12 S-3 - ( NOR IIFUNDS WP@I T65 Altos, YEAS NOT LOCATED DY 1 E .B ' APPKou.ATE U. OfNiIED NA AWu i m G PH.N,D .Y M`D DY i:F1D YUSµFgJ r 'DD'. OWEI1i 4RWP. m T (/ TOTAL AREA =1,048 ACRES+/. TOTAL WETLAND AREA = 979 ACRES+A TOTAL UPLAND AREA 69 ACRES+/_ [) EDGE OF MARSH n IS LDCATED IN i�11 NOVEMBER 2007 T Pia w .w z m - APPROXIMATE LOCATION m w CF UPLAND SPOIL z z DISPOSAL AREA rV ce uAuceY atTK AND mGl awxiwa . unm aTRIu vnoTawaxr ,D,IN - L18 L1T Lis 21 Z L22 L21 L2U 119 .15 US L4 MALLCRY L14-- -... 50' CREEK 11 UU 9 NGREEK �� OA 'AVER DAN (LANAI) EDGE OF MARSH /> AS LOCATED IN NOVEMBER 2007 PACE, RACHEL PICKET & ETALS DEED BOOK 1332. PAM 607 MAP CA ' v, PAGE .H4 THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE JURISDICDON OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON DOS DATE. UNLESS THERE IS A CHANGE IN THE LAW. OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS OATS. THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTIUZING THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLAND DELINEATION MANUAL REGULATORY OFFICIAL _ TIRE: _ DATE: USAGE ACTION 10: 0 PACE, RACHEL PICKET & ETALS DUD BOOK 2669. PAGE 732 I N.C. GRID NORTH NAD. 1983-01 GRAPHIC SCALE a0 J 1 D W �f�C;gIIVg AUG 05 2999 1J 1 iv n FEoo)TL ro VIC�IWTY MAP LEGENl3 O = CALCULATED POINT NOT SET D = EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT pe - IRON PIPE FOUND OO =IRON ROD FOUND 0 = IRON ROD SET O = EXISTING RAILROAD SPIKE T-L= PE-UNE WETLAND HATCH AUJOINER PROPERTY UNE NOT SURVEYED RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT UNE BOUNDARY UNE NOTES 1. ALL BEARINGS ARE ORIENTED TO N.C. GRID NORTH, N.A.D. 1983, 2001 ADJUSTMENT. SCALE FACTOR = 1.0000464. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GRID DISTANCES EXCEPT AS NOTED. 2- A PORTION OF THE PLATTED TRACTS APPEAR TO BE IN A FLOOD HAZARD ZONE 3. SURVEY MADE FROM DEED BOOK 2467, PAGE 474 AND MAP BOOK 15. PAGE 32 4. TOTAL AREA AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT = 1.048 ACRES +/-. 5. AREA CALCULATED TO EDGE OF MARSH LOCATED NOVEMBER 2007 AND IS APPROXIMATE 6. SEE SHEET S-5 FOR UNE AND CURVE TABLES J. REVISED MAY 4, 2009 TO SHOW APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UPLAND SPOIL DISPOSAL AREA S. REWSED PER COMMENTS JUNE 15. 2009. . DESCRIPTION RRE BY REMSONS OWNER(S): BALE LAND AND TIMBER, LUG P.O. BOX 15345 NEW BERN. N.C. 28561 CAPE FEAR Engineering, Inc. wwRmpe(uren9J:ttm9+om O.WBH : SI£44ETI PRDFLT oe'vGr: u.rAufin xuu6Erz. me-12 CIffAX: NNOIDLEY SGtE: P�YD' AP%iOND: MNOMI£Y DAR: Oho!-0B WETLAND SURVEY FOR: BATE LAND AND TIMBER, LLC EAST TRACT TOWNCREEK TOWNSHIP BRUNSWICK COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA EN 12 I S-4 u G u u �xbE`RSn4vo�i€ e iiiii?ii1?iiiiiiiiiii11i1iiiiiliiiil{{iii?I ii111";=iiiii{{ t{aY111{{{?s-'iiii{???iiiiali{111 {.t 1 J Z (ZjJ Q �/1 L115 iiiiy 't 11iW%1ii F'p 'p 9�ai::a"5iiii5i5 i5T iii"v• a'1ii"si" xaw^ ?- ,;^asa_ „ ;,:a?ea KOM Is aliii "iii ?aii?ia?_ -aa axa __ sii1gga?gF7 1 ?-ea?a:I"*d ad :a 9 90 Y1ri`s"si7d^^°npq Yqq Aa a as"p"Y a'e 9 r 00 p x iiiiii?illiiill?iiili iiiii'ii1Fw xdad??^" a??gdaa;Y4sap: as R F -i {?ifi??aaii?alai?1?magi??i?:?i??iai?ililii ergo :ii{{{i1i{i1i1{iT 1{{{1i{ilriiiliii'is?ir1{=g1?1i1F?,dZacdaFga:@I32as 0 i9iii?ililiiiil. iii=iiii1i111111iiii11i1? ??iil4iiii uR. 1i1t1i{yW {I T.... -II T1ii ....I iiiliii {?S.-1 ?1111TI..... la i..... iiiiilliYYsi:$?i??? ?0"?? 11 i a;iilyiii'i e i1e;111?{,{i{1i ia9•Rpi T iiiiilil -ggi1 111iYi11?11111{i{ 4 I. 11111 zis?iifi q. Rcaa9 •a� _ aaa saaaaa a p49S^C`•''-�ia2ea _. eggaap,, i dia{{"''?tlaa;'; s+ocb- „ -aaa^° aaaq:r:ya i..a?... "4i°`,y i�R?aa "l la aC"� as"e aaa:p:a??q Y1se.11?i?i??iiii????i??i.?'?Yi1s????{1? 1i1is111R a .i. . Riyad _ __eY"e4Ya7 t Srso' 9 0?Yia;?i?i?iii? .911' 1?!S?i1 ?i?9?q° .— .. 1 ? ?i?i3 aza? £ .>ofim as aZ �,1a, a,- ii. ^.°c ^.....iiii -Fc= :_?aa PF T ' 4 ?4S?iY{iiclytcll{1Yi{Y{?iY4g?i5iS?iiii??1ia? a-.k A9i !:qR __,a^_?a iiiii?•„?=i?i?i�iili?31 ,wsaxiiAa : a: ?s? , iiiT. - a1 o; u =�i?iiiTs,yli?i1=y1{Y1{{i{i{1i1ii1i i1i?iiF aRi1A A T.? to , YT ,roo iy a ^a7aa2e ono l� "c5?c rl?iS=`10T?i3Yi{Yiiii ?irai{i iRdaR� a ,1a aa•a•°aa;s°• aaa_a? ?aaaar orm.ao iiiiiili?1111iiiii? {i'ii,,,,. - _a:aaaaa= -- -- -- ,iv 1r -1 0 • M W C) LL 0 W LQ I' 19t?'iiI"a3?}{{:�i}33}9ii"s#ri��}}i}1�4°}�?�a?ai5i9;age9 'aF9d°;r"?°.r,ir,. . .r?_ a 9955 ryry N ?S?'IT ?}}iii}?}�??"0'l,}??Cti{�iy{i{��}:Sa?4}°R� a aa, so oB -. a?saaa;aT TT 99 a 8+50 {S{? !?? }a�Yi{1"{}} i7 a{11ii{3{Ttiy{'{iii 9�%p7F A, ��p.. {{{�� {i B+BB 8 q ?i?yIT ^ TT44T, T;; 'ya ^}i{37q?; "}'"i{i41{{#{??{:?{3{{T{g'�{{#, '{'sgaaR 'B£°�zcna}T}a __??„ T,_}aze; uz..' 3B• "aa}}" aae- 3a,FAk' T i i}i?jiig'q?y"s {cy. . ... 744ar}a T aa:i's, f TT:�?iiiW9C}-'{A?{ii?{Yi k I?i'71?9?}Yii`s?}}y}}sg1Yi}i?iy???e3r3i??4iyd"e}}p7} iiiii „i° .aa 0a?eaa"aa}aaa P.N'F xeoa7a _aaa}aaT}sa,:sa yl~'n_;•.�•;}aa_;'", - �,asB �B rtua _ asa 6 }}}} ?c?qc T{11^"• }}}}}}}?�C }'y S.I..T Aa;:yI R aF� as ;_ ___}a vsa ' 4s}}}i'i,?�:}}}?°}i #'s}}°y9j?T{il'ilS�Ti �A2Ad �d s:}W 9a _ ea"•_aa?I _?`ea »Ba , as17 TT .ai? T T iT � �"? ai,';a: �r���`iT `e a'e `s 's Ts T�-r9"4a s 4a m W w 9 g 0 w sae����aea=a� J ti Q Z�4 a yy y5 x0� � F�Fi31"•?jiai?;s;gyj?4??Pi9#F1?9si�1iiF733311F3 :F:Fa^A� RRaS"p'paa"yay.; ayh^a•5 „ i11lifi�Fi�ilaia11311"��0'�"•�j?9������}�'ji'��7aii99aag"`fikaPd"�a3tl_g9a�e a_•e .'a as-_ O �iiri�glaaliigyieisFqF#??1pilaii?iq$?i;3liii ??P?i9", ?S+R sdend�a� asaa]aaa,,^; as a ic29ji s'{i'{33ii;iiaii $?i s i31h11133333;• ii i?r?FS"r999ii^ iigFls.s.__ r.so - 8 N jfi:QF?3F1YF31a13"^.°^. iiY{1314i i 119Fi?TC4r iaagz�c y'i %"q iRlcaaa ,;'^3uaa4"a '�a""sae 8450 Q j{"{i-i:719' . . . .,ii133133j'?1'{FF?i=Q:13 311aii�am.y^�aF�iisaiaa ]?saaaaa d Y1YSi13133^". iFFFFF"3?=?111$�tlitliyyl??.�'+FFa.FW7 ]i 90 3?jsilli?i ?Fi��1 ,]i s?sa „a .. a.. 99 aF=iF �i 41• •11 F 4&spa �d�d"a_ _ " , ♦Spy p - i iii"t:iipg33gYFpS2 o'iS83•ii 33 i iii i "a icdal^Ai "' I ic lis{SSgilgciq?11'siiiii:iiiq=3a�AF;,':a• _,yaa_aa Y #Yiiq?gj3Yiq�iiisi^�c333Y dlai iiiSi is �1'. F= 4?9 iii BiKi Fia Iso"6 as _ as?aa aaa sa^ yE S ......idii"sia34393439;133iiipi33133i"s?}1�17y:,",i�iaR 19 j9:4313"s iy5.23{33333 c'^. iiiiiii?{33133iif hN11RRFk 1, .'.�.. iso , _ `"YY"Y 4 Y F�iYi1YYYFt.iYiY::s 19iF1tYiii113gii133i Yj3gi°qi .ld .. ' 9 g 91i39Yi1T2Fi:.i __ F}Y F'11i1a�9313gYi i Al%.4'A 1,A i�^ T ii � .i iYii39Y{ FF?'f°iyiiY33{ii "e i43iFgpgiiYi 1AaA1.,k 9q si9 �F1F1Yt1::F19Fic""i' :11:YSYFFFFYtl33iY Yic•��-k �p 9a aa7- `a 5�,_ c y N F�F111F11F 2�YYFF F'F 199fi1#14i?1's 133i11i14c iA:X adk _ - --- "9? ate naa ' i Y313jC:^."cv^. 1:FF%?iiii49Fii?4ii1??#si Yxda^"AR i a :a. aa_as_a: =�=aaaaga aaa I wso.. ^ n iSofcaSc c°pq cc$ip{ijiiS SiciYi^"typk dp a5? ^3c - - aaaa aq? '? 'r7 1 ?'FFF „ ciiiccipi73?�??1?'?i:g11i,#and: ::s?i?? Y ,T T T T V) W J Q Of QCr O ' ,J V w IU L Z j Z Qo U Z z C_ o_ G ~ a 0 JL) 0 W" W Of I0� 0 0 z 0 • � • .�_._,_.:. ..w_.... ,..��. _.� ...._wa