79818_Rovert Sullivan_20210820

F
D DREDGE & FILL 44, AMA/ N° 79818 A 0 C D
G NERAL PERMIT Previous permit# ,,s///{
��% Ltl1Vew OModification ❑Complete Reissue ❑Partial Reissue Date previous permit issued . ..v/,'4 '
As authorized.by the State of North Carolina.Department of Environmental Quality and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant to ISA NCAC C)7# /72
i 0 •
C✓Rules attached.
Applicant Name �U4/'s/ , S 1/• ''4h Project Location: County . J I ti.G-: __
Address
//_•/�p$/ r7._/ /�/` d Street Address/State Road/Lot#(s) Jr(/ 5,•wcr ___.
•City L y_L_,-. 441.J. State VA ZIP 2 h/.5O.� L.-, .-,O!'. Y
/�� 0'° as t c 6 el Subdivision -_.///��
Phone#(`/� 6�"�/�.ZIJ E-Mail�lLsiO/
Authorized Agent ' — —_ ____ -_. Ciy OGCi cd!__�_ - ZIP .-2 7 y�0 _
Affected CW Lit& i`P DES OPTS Phone# (----7) _ _ River Basin__7c/4,-,
•
C]OEA ❑HHF ❑I L1 UBA Q MIAAEC(s): Adj.Wtr.Body .e:s.i ke, So .M 1 nat hian/unkn)
❑PWS: /
ORW: yes / no PNA yes / ) Closest Maj.Wtr.Body l�--'L' 1.' '.
Type of Project/-Activity A d It:r;z-e- r a'.-• 9,2 `x , ' oi.r /,//'/(�'• o, ' >`• 4/
/' (Scale: 1 = 77(,) )
Pier(dock)length Y,2`Y-6 `e
Fixed Platforms) cct`Yf i ! : ... - •
Floating Platform(s) •
D I c, L� 7! I
Finger pier(s)_ , - l I ! -- -, _1 - : 1 i I . f • •
t
Groin length -___•
_,-.-- -----_____--- _-- ----- ,---
number 1 Jj
Bulkhead/Riprap length- -1 i
avg distance offshore_ -__ 1 ' - I I .. I
max distance offshore— 1 •
' _ -- '--- ' - - -. -- t !._. .. • - �. — - -l
jj
Basin,channel — iii. : •: ; :
cubic yards r —
Boat ramp - - - ;1•-!' : •- 1- -- --_
Boathouse/Boatlift ! `
Beach Bulldozing___x ' •
Other i r / ,
Shoreline Length 6_ i -- J �i rlr._1_-.` r' ! 1 '.i _ ' .____ a.____ r7• ' /9„4_
SAV: not sure yes nor - )' '• _` , . , • • , _ • . ✓ I . • -
•
Moratorium n/a yes cu� ./- , ?'
rJ
Photos: e no ,i I - / t`P•l J� L f
Waiver Attached: y s no -- - ••--- - --- - 1.. 4C.._J` . .- -_ --`_
C�// / ../
A building permit may be required by: . f7- '- - (� Uses note on back regarding.River Basin rules.
(Note Local Planning Jurisdiction) l
Notes/Special Conditions t - 6-7//, /.VDU ) no -or•'' s / / tale.,/ ' , n/' -pi / 4-,� •
at%ll.e...reel' I/NJt.rr A.'," ,Qc•''-r+,Isio;er--Ci,:nc. I f'�•eJ /[l(JT•/ 7 )' •-•1 -
- A 1,7L .
_ rr_. 1
Ale rt l S(tche s �'plc'f --
Agent or App• ant Printed N PermitOfficer,:s Printed Name __
Signature en Please read ompliance statement on of permit'°' Signature
G cl
Application Fee(s) Check# I ing Dat Expiration Date

•
•
ADMACENVRIPAISAN PROiPERTYON NERSTAT LENT
• I henity,00rtify that I own ranpeny aciacart to ?ekiir c?44 5-4 .,ie.cif,,ea.n. .6
propertyotatadat lq 1-S a v'ra L.,I<c in-e.re -
�^ N (Address.�.OL Block Road.at&)
lD ✓4A ,in . vacfre ko K on is. ;to P N.C.
- (wstarbodY) (Cityrfown natter County)
The OPPficant has described'in me,as sham belaW,the deve(opment,proposed at the above
location. °
,�,,,_ I have no objection to ills ptopos • ,
Man objedlorss to this*posit. t
DESCRIPTION ANINOR DRAWING OF PROPOSED DEVELOPFIPNNT
(fedi*t o it I proposing development nowt MY fo?doicrietitop be!oto or attachagha.dlrat r;,g)
WS
(a'Z t Eni ty (9?Fin+-
_ __ __ : 44tip _
.:
s
1. fro4—7 TsZ'al,4lier,J�••r:�'
h / pf(rt.1. S-I►-SL
`?
tiG e
� G qmf,oprf
ya
.'-� WAIVER SECTION •
.r I understand that a pier,dock moor'ng per,tort ramp,breakwater,boathouse.bit.or groin
must be set back a minimum dimmed of 15 Iwo my area of hoodoo aCss unless waived by
me.(II you wish to waive the sdbad.you most kaSal the agpeopdiats blank betoaw_)
tdo wish ta waive tha tSsecrewurttr+fent
I do not wish towaive the.i5 sew iequirmnesiL .
(Propxty fntomtnetion)` tPc panda ar fa►instram)
srs++ 7ivt,ta '[ i
arum. • ;
2dW( A- itP1u..n it .Col t..,tc(fl,..e.' L.
+a` f 4,121-
Riot or Typo Nom 4 Pre'ter r
OS t stir 1 II Pet - Pt, °
VA- amass 1141771.4
0a�� .���thJr-r i c.lGeaAr;t.t n1 C �1..1 R,i'O /3
3 Akdnc- 07 24,adNais 11, a�•rao, - �t , 9, r.-011 4[.o�C'rttAri;vie hmI�f•
igiphana.
71117oo I D 4 02-(
Valdtor con.nlanderywuaIsralgntsre ( Qltug.20rs)

RIPARIAN NOTIFICATION COVER LETTER FOR
LAMA MAJOR PERMIT APPLICATION
Drs.Stephanie K.and Robert A.Sullivan;Jr
1651 Fox.Hill Rd
Lynchburg,VA 24503
Certified Mail—Return Receipt Requested
June 23,2021
Susan B.and Todd Collins
518 Pine St
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Dear Susan and Todd,
Drs.Stephanie and Robert Sullivan are applying for a CAMA Major permit to add a dock located
at 391 Silver Lake Rd on Pamlico sound in.Hyde county;North Carolina.The specifics of the
proposed work are in the enclosed application form and drawing. -
As the adjacent riparian property owner to the aforementioned project,we are required to
notify you of the development in order to give you the.opportunity to comment On the project.
Please review the attached permit application and drawing.
Should.you have any objection to this proposal,please send your written comments to Shane F.
Staples,DMC Field Representative Washington Office,943 Washington Square Mall,
Washington, NC 27889 within 10 days of your receipt of this notice.Such comments will be
considered by the Department in reaching afinal decision on the application. No comment
within 10 days of your receipt of this notice will be considered as no objection. If you have any
questions on the project,please call me at434-665.4720,or e-mail me at.sullidoc@aol:com.
Sincerely,
rs.Stephanie and Robert Sullivan
enclosures

;,- - • ,.
.:. .
,CERTIFIED MAIL •'RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY'OWNER NOTIFICATION/WAIVER FORM
Name of Property Owner 124)be4 4.11,4cP ck hqcte tvi ci (t wadi,
.,5 i er%711I
Address of Property: ,1 I vet La .AS OCC4bAce NIC 77 5 6c,
(Lot or Street#,Street or Road,City&County)
Agent's Name#: IINT./tC. biwera_ Mailing Address: TO gOK i 4
Agent's phone#: 6-ekke ne‘t.o.000,Ca-VettteD t t011 CC niCeke Nrc. 2.7770
1
- -
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to the,above referenced property. The individual
applying for this permit has described to me as shown on the attached drawing the development
they are proposing.A description or drawing.-with dimensions must be provided with this letter.
I have no objections to this proposal. _ I have objections to this proposal.
Ifyou have objettions to what isbeing propoted,you must notify the Division of Coastal Management
(DCA1) in,writing within 10 days of receipt of this notice. Contact information for DCM offices is
available at hituSwww.nccoastalmanaciementnet/web/cm/staff-listina orby calling 1-1188-4RCOAST.
Notesponse Is considered the same as no objection ifyou have been notified by Certified MaiL
WAIVER SECTION
I understand that a pier, dock, mooring pilings;boat ramp, breakwater, boathouse, or lift must
be set back a minimum distance of 15'from my area of riparian access unless waived by me. (If
you wish to waive the setback,you must initial the appropriate blank below.)
_ I do wish to waive the 15'setback requirement.
I do not wish to waive the 15'setback requirement.
'c'-------- (Pre. - -V-fr-co n er information)ii t ie (Riparian Property Owner Information)
dillb
A ,
'
Signalgre ' --- AD S'ignature -
iaci f AISA. tutlierr lam ZI-6.41)41) '1 vdd e.C.5 SkS401 3 (ireia,
Print or Type Name - Print or Type Name
•
(Esc-I -61c WI( r_d 510 1:7;ite Mailing Address Address Mailing Address .
Livid4drol VA-- 2 '(st)3 -Pki 464.10 14.4.4- PA- Ili 06
City/Siate/Dp -, City/Siate/Ep -- -
(-1- q\ 6425"(412fAillidOCeetoLtdm (61q) 331 - 8205a/rtics4n,yur4-.(0-a.:IsPeowl,
Telephone Number/Email A less. Telephone Number/Ern I Address
, 11 (”1 V-024
Date Date
(Revised Aug.2014)

•
Z 1°.1 i J.(7.771- 9-- a1
3 if!,19 455115 t4-41s' I i"5
,h.ZE 11
I: • ,.. P I 1% 2I7J. _,
,. la * .•i ,
p,sikpas..,4
a Yei tau?
•-,, IA32-24.TS 1
m—• 1 .1 •
C • i.g*....
4.1.449oca 9 !rr:7:0 I
. .
Pui#141 1?es e ipe#e jo Atotati wadi/6*OP ili lill7sinaiiidulgolaateP 6uodiaidiehittAlP40
INEAWC1713kla 1:13S0d0Ncl 0 ONIAAVilgl HOKINV NO041110S30
------:-._=_•-,-,--_—__. .,.---.- _ , .. . - -
. ,

July 29,2021
Dear Mr.Staples:
We write with respect to the letter we received July 20,2021,from Drs.Stephanie and Robert Sullivan
regarding their application for a CAMA General permit to add a dock located at 391 Silver Lake Road on
Pamlico Sound.
The Sullivans are our next door neighbors,and for that reason we hesitate to object to their proposed
200 foot dock. In addition,we lack expertise on issues relating to land and water management. For
these reasons, rather than object,we wish to lay out certain concerns that the Sullivans' proposal
engenders. We leave it to you and your colleagues, Mr.Staples,to assess these concerns and others
about the proposal:
1. What is the impact on marine plant life? According to the "Description and/or Drawing of
Proposed Development",the proposed dock appears to stretch 200 feet from shore,then to
extend 24 feet northward,and to be at least six feet in width. (It is possible the proposed dock is
intended to be considerably wider than six feet;as suggested by the notation: "7 foot 6"to
center of piling.")Such dimensions would appear to cover up,and block sunlight to, 1,344
square feet of marine plant life.
2. What is the impact on navigation?We see a possible danger that the proposed dock would
extend so far west, in the direction of the boat channel, as to impede navigation. This is
particularly of concern for persons in sailboats, kayaks and canoes,who might encounter
difficulty circumventing the dock without either veering into the boat channel or else getting
swamped from the waves created by ferries and other large boats passing nearby.
3. What is the likelihood of unsightly damage to the proposed dock as a result of storms?The
nearby Horizons dock remained broken and degraded for over a year and a half following
Hurricane Dorian's pummeling of Ocracoke. In the event the proposed dock is constructed, it
would be helpful to secure a binding obligation on the part of the owners'to remove the dock
within three or at the most six months of substantial storm damage.
4. Is there a danger of further changes to plans for the proposed dock that could pose additional
risks to the environment?When we were first informed of the Sullivans'desire to build a dock,
we were led to understand that the dock would be 70 feet in length.Anxious to avoid creating
bad blood with new neighbors,we reluctantly agreed.The revised proposal for a dock more
nearly three times the size of the original proposed dock raises concerns that further
enlargement might be sought in the future.
5. Will there be,a prohibition on superstructures, boat houses, boat pens,or other structures built
on top of the dock?When we assented to the original 70 foot dock proposal,we did so on the
understanding that the Sullivans would construct,at most,a fish cleaning table on the dock. We
have not been informed whether the Sullivans remain willing to accede to these limitations.
6. Will the Sullivan dock, if allowed, lead others to build long docks,which would only exacerbate
the concerns outlined above?
We understand and appreciate the expertise that you, Mr.Staples, and your colleagues bring to
your evaluation of the Sullivans'application.We appreciate the work that you do to protect the
coastline. If it would assist you and your colleagues, might we suggest that you consider requiring
the Sullivans to provide independent expert analysis of particular aspects of the environmental and

related impact of their proposed dock? If you believe this might be helpful in your evaluation,we
would be willing to consider sharing with the Sullivans a portion of the cost of the independent
analysis,considering the possible impact of the proposed dock not only on us as next door
neighbors but also on Ocracoke as a whole.
Thanks for your consideration of our comments. If you have questions or would like further
information from us, please let us know.
Sincerely,
s/
Susan and Todd Colllins
Cc: Drs.Stephanie and Robert Sullivan
Mr. Bill Gilbert

8/23/2021
I spoke with Mrs.Collins this morning and indicated that DCM had issued a CAMA permit to Mr.Sullivan
for the construction of a 100' long pier under a CAMA General permit. Mr.& Mrs.Collins had raised
concerns for a previously proposed 200' long pier. I asked Mrs. Collins if she would like for us to send her
a letter with directions for appealing the permit issued to Mr.Sullivan.She indicated that she did not
want us to send her a letter with directions because they were satisfied with the new length of 100'.
r./4
Kelly Spivey G
/41-4Th
-5/ Z-Z �
DCM,Washington DistrictManager