51911D - Bohne

��jj
1 c4mA/ ❑DREDGE & FILL gam ' P11V - •NG 5
;ENERAL PERMIT r;f `'�Previous permit#
INew ❑Modification ❑Complete Reissue ❑Partial Reissue '2 1 2007 ate previous permit issued
•ized by the State of North Carolina,Department of Environment and Natural Resources
:oastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant to I 5A NCAC •(ZOO
1 XRules attached.
:Name P t'1) ,t►t.-, /B1sd? / Project Location: County .�/�.ti / /e rcAle,i -
b2E9 7 iV.. / ,4, /r G/f.R'hio Street Address/State Road/Lot#(s) LQ r
4/ph/ 7Ah
State ! ZIP 2Sy� /�c�r( 7..9.) 7. ON?Fax#( ) — Subdivision 4lP34: Gt,e'efel5
ed Agent f-- City ZIP �J
nEW E1W 0-PTA ❑ES ❑PTS Phone# ( ) Se1 l River Basin C 1�Oe
❑OEA ❑HHF ❑IH ❑UBA ❑N/A Adj.Wtr. Body gr / ( " 'e 4 nat
❑PWS: ❑FC:
yes I PNA / no Crit.Hab. yes / no Closest Maj.Wtr. Body r�-� 'P 52j"4
7
Project/Activity C(`'7� ?�'1.--,!7%LNh a � � /47y'i 1.--04 7* ,4,1,///`"
/l/tC�j'iri sr iv . e:
:k)length 2.15'X y
,(s) ,2 -k 6 , j,� 71g,4,4•*e /. T� ., /-
ier(s) I
ngth 1l �` V.
t I ��,
nber Y "� v v to
l/Riprap length i+-/f i C�r , { d 4 A { it I V I J
:distance offshore /' k4glitirr +.._-. i e 1, 4 x distance offshore „ � trif i
cannel �` . �
-
)ic yards "_��,1� . } __ -. ... IT . -t...-..-..-L.. I'+ I . I' , — ti
to 4
se/Boatlift / 1 } I 1
1 ' ii.
. .
1
ulldozin r 4f ' I I
i r 2
( : 4 rk
e Length '1"MR vil I. f
not sure yes no V .L{ �`! i 4 " i
s: not sure yes o 1 >i. I T s i _
V � I f
cum: n/a yes J
yes g
1C i
Attached: .e, no Am ! 4 ! ; t—ri,t. ' V
rx /(T (Q _
ng permit may be requi --- • : / . , / //�1 . }� L See note on back regarding River Basin r
I -1 . / . / _I "'De-a/P ei] _�' ;_` /

FRONT DESK COVER SHEET (HAND DELIVERED PACKAGES)
DATE /1 /3 U TIME /r 6)(' am pis
PROJECT NAME &)hr)(' S ka yak e�
CONSULTANT FIRM NAME
RECEI'
EXPRESS Yes No CHECK? Yes No Check # DCM WILMIN(
DELIVER TO? I201NOV 1 4

obb/
hAl2- -1-h.k iirpfabA btorm,
\Q-kc,02igQ v aux dak P-DaDkh c4u
u1-63- u\k, mithA -41 - uptc
V\u-&-Q3 kx-YsLA 4kActia- LcrActi-uitizA ,
Wou-Q6 b4 , (obL r,u N1-6
r„�, ,, e my psnrnt}- 4-toArYtintADAA(pci ?
p6131, v(A/Ltiz_) !
i.vokAA/
-4A_Gook Pz) 6JL
zto7 o3v7

DIVISION OF COSTAL MANAGEMENT
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION/WAIVER FORM
Name of Individual Applying for Permit: Matthew Bohne
Address of Property 6200 N Bradley Overlook Wilmington, NC 28403
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to the above-referenced property. The
individual applying for this permit has described to me as shown on the attached drawing
the development they are proposing. A description or drawing with dimension should be
provided� with this letter.
0,!l/ I have no objections to this proposal.
If you have objections to what is being proposed, please write the Division of Costal
Management, 127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington NC 28405 or Call 910-796-
7215 within 10 days of receipt of this notice. No response is considered the same as no
objection if you have been notified by certified mail.
Waiver Section
I understand that a Pier, dock, morring pilings, breakwater, boathouse or boat lift must be
set back a minimum distance of 15' from the area of riparian access—unless waived by
me. (If you wish to waive the setback, you must initial the appropriate blank below.)
I do wish to waive the 15' setback requirement.
I do not wish to waive the 15' setback requirement.
Sign Name :' Date ( ee 07
Print Name
Q Sa rJ

r
•
,Example A. Red line is pier and Blue line indicates Riparian line. See attached detail
drawing of width/length and location (example c)
,&:;: \ 2 `o is,, x£{.111 w �u
a 4
i.,
11:::-..:4..:::.:..m....:-,.:.1-..i.:.....o:iiiiif,:.;:oiii.i.i.,.::.:.:•m." ..:...,..:It4::;........3,,,.:4.:H.:-....L .::, :::::::::litw,........:...........„,."
.,::.::::..qiiii. liiit.k.:.K.,..,......;.:40,,,:•..:%.4.,4,3t...... ..?::iii::.:!;-::...:4:4%.,,v,,_!i:..:'.:,:iiii..;;:i::::4:.... .i.,
L
:0:ii.::::::::::::: ::::.::::::::„.-..,.,::::::!...„:::,. .. ./.:.::!!..,.:::1:0,- -.........-.........:lar-,:.,..,:;:i ....:;:...q:..*:1/41.0%.,:........r..
J •}
+�,;�` 'b�� � ' fit"' ,'t�hix: •.::}+i:M.."r:L k.
t
x3::•,•:Y.::>Cr a•.::.Ai Jo, .,- ...}:'t : :: a , 43. : :`;y:''
:;:.:,ii: .:.�: }?; 'c 2-.''::atCg:•.{:: F .- :'; �4:-..:fi. :::5 .: ti,
.�4Y: r.•:.F.
••::.fix +. ....:....... .,
::.Jo.,R:: >:Y•..:::::: •:4.•:::•+. : •: .::::t.i.,.::*. .:�r
:rY.vi:t,.�:. ..f� ::;:?:�:�::;:'`.:::> :2-i.'. .:
'£�o.},'vp.?�'F:::::.,•.;;:2�.;{}::;:;+.s,;:•2•• : 2 :'v';� ' 'Fai•Y:.2;y:F :;;:%j,;:}:
:::F::F::2::Fi:;:;�::; ��,{+•a}:?.:.C: •� Jo:�;':`�.:'::;`::' ?i' '�:ry: ; : ..m. ::R223+{:;..�: \..on..
{.•:2'Y;... :::•x{.Y:•Y':•:�::�.:;'•;'.:::;:;:: :a:oY.•. ,e: ••g' '°�. .YY '�:::i:Y ..ti'•:. .;�;,.,},.;..:.:.t.
,{. :.::..rv:.::•y:•,:..... `:22{•Y:222�:2:::i:.Yv:.
iY:iii
4:•Yp\K /
:::::::::. -{:4}.iIiiimpiA.:::-:\-:v::.:,•:::•:. +`~.{;•.,• ,,.`�-: >Y:nJ.�. ::•.w.v::�v:::.::.v:•::.....:w:�:�:.:.� ::S.v:�:.::...:::... ::•:. �.C�v
:�:�:�:p::�:.: .. ..\.. ,vv. v:..,..,....,v.•J.:::v:•.4.. ...�.. �+•:.v;......, v;:.:n{•..:::� ;v:•.�.r.:::::::::::.v.�:::.::::::r�::::::::::..:...:...; JY:::
... .. ..2� ... .....,................. ::,..:.:?a:: :.�.,�.:::.:.v.• .t-:::.�::..x-s:.....::::. .. ::Y:�••: .......... iis;Y:»'F:•}:•YY:•: .: ,,g��
::::... ..\,a,. J. ,'A.v::A:..+.J}::t, ...,n\}Yy.;�:q..x:.� ... ...... .. ,Y:n�::.<•.;'. .0 •. ��(n }"'
.:;;:::.:. 'a -::::::£:,•:::Y :::Y;;r:•Y.....::.. _:....:: . ::. .. ::.:::::.:: •Y.Y�,:•r'J. : Y}. ::4.:::i::i:; ::::;Y::}:•.:;'.;:: F
.... \2x \:.v;..........r{..: �•w:; •
............. .... . 4Y:i::+:'•i:�Y::�:::::�YY:�Y}::iY'•:a. �{(•
'•}.::a�� ':{a}v;::a�'•::?+v:..::.;.v. .Jii.4>.Y�xY}:... :w::.'�yq�� ; ..
iI.Nimmitemik
%
'^b''`•�`{xv :j�:F•>YY:•::::::a: <`: � `{:j•.::Z;.; < i''%�'�rr::4i-'�:';{ < �C �J
�::::,' k.:.*:3.:,F;Y{`:::£.,:::1,,...‹,..:. ' ,f✓,'4 bt4 .�,�fig ,,>?°°Y `::
•,$ti{�:d.'::. :.:+•x•:.:.,,�: <4 c`•.,K':'�:G:i::; �"<:??: ;:.£:;' -io$:o:' � 'Si":::� :�
X,�417:. a, -?�:•:-:•:>:Y:•YYY'1.+..YY :h::T :y:.:'.Yf•i:' �ai'+:y2.:...
•'•:Yv:vJ' M:•Y::- ,.iw:..-.v:: •i:::4YYY:{::v:.:... yy��,�
:Y I
.,s:
. .• • :‘• ...".,........:::..•••••••• ,
...... .. •••:••••,..::,:..,•,......,...:••:.• .•
-' ..• *.:::;•• "•••• •••"
,.:..... ....--
v w::0::. ,.:.:. , •?Y:•:??4i}i:?<{.ii:!�;:Gi::•... :. �:::.�::.. .:.,.;:...::Y:4Y.}?: '::�:<'::
�.. •,ate•:. ...\•.,{:.:..:............... :. �..a;. .;. ; ... :;{:.+-{C•J::-: •1{:Gi
- :".';"- -.
{
.,. .. ••. ,,mo�tt ��:�>
�Y'K•:•5:;?;£:?: .,;2yK -3�+/.,2F::xa>'':.'•.'•;}:Y`'�:;�•:;F,�;•`..: �t�.p�`. '�4:'� •:+'4c• {�• I
}..>`.:�'. �::v v '• v:F:i?�a'.�•Y:C--:"?:::Y:ti�\l�f/:r:�,,>.:r....-.{:' :F�.�t•:; �q�p �. y F'
•
..• ., }. 4Y v' 4. ''v,.. 'y �i ... .::•. }}Y•,,{... -. :....4:::::Y Y:''<": $'i:;$$•F..;.�.�.�y v.(�yC
'- %. •K{'v.. + 4}x::4Y:•v�P'•:•6 v}.• Y�lf v., }:;:>:?. '. ;,
.Q; :.\.; v. .\- <4.. ..;c•::: ,.;\.:�:�jj tF,vKa:}., .x,,2;go<:w: :-� �•�Y';3:::•:ty::..
::::,
::�reaw_e7eib `•,`h,}.:•':<J:-` r:;ic}':: :F;::, ,t< .\�+\•r.,yCC;. ,..kC,2{'�vtM1.:�'�,,J..F• .'3 .£Y:':::a:�::S6

DIVISION OF COSTAL MANAGEMENT
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION/WAIVER FORM
Name of Individual Applying for Permit: Matthew Bohne
Address of Property 6200 N Bradley Overlook Wilmington, NC 28403
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to the above-referenced property. The
individual applying for this permit has described to me as shown on the attached drawing
the development they are proposing. A description or drawing with dimension should be
provid d with this letter.
I have no objections to this proposal.
If you have objections to what is being proposed, please write the Division of Costal
Management, 127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington NC 28405 or Call 910-796-
7215 within 10 days of receipt of this notice. No response is considered the same as no
objection if you have been notified by certified mail.
Waiver Section
I understand that a Pier, dock, morring pilings, breakwater, boathouse or boat lift must be
set back ' ium distance of 15' from the area of riparian access—unless waived by
. (If you w. aive the setback, you must initial the appropriate blank below.)
/ ./ I do ' h to waive the 15' setback requirement.
o not wish to waive the 15' setback requirement.
_n.
Sign Name (9 ,, _„ ? S w WL-7Ce
U--- Date / /� e--(97
Print Name q / 0 f, �L

Example A. Red line is pier and Blue line indicates Riparian line. See attached detail
drawing of width/length and location(example c)
mt% _ _ .._ __. .
ak ---- ,. it,
iv lk
---,A_ . .... :...4 ‘k.:°
`.
M ;% f •
�. ..;
i r
c '
011,;.,
Ita
• yx R' c
tf,
n

Diagram 3 is the dock proposed. See attached detailed diagram for measurements.
Lout 1 ff+ G Low
Vthi IA 1 ti t leak
9[ x
1
1
\ �tk Kai
l
L —____ in
5,,tre \
\ _
\ ,
1
1 22_5'`4
1 \
, _�/ ' (ipang\
col-rido►r
r _
v
b4
1

NIA \__,_____._ _. j
1/4 A .
\ ���
d a
tee.+sii �;
,N .„: 1,I .
Lc./-- -6:"\ c ,, \
..quint Ft9ift-16.a„ tj Zl"8
x
d"ixii 7rc' 1"31' __.\
141
91 1V el' !111,41A mot 1 P€O '1 (WI
T cuQaea

1.010 term 4+6 1`1
i
s9aAtr u+ PIA ap ti
7 f
/ / , -.-' I)

7
//-'
.
1,Q- ri'• 0'' ic3.----
84 00 ce'• s'(/ W 0 ':=N-----,-.,,,
'884,
/
1..1.1
...k9
•,:?..4, ,,./
.\\ W § C)
/ • •4Z".........,.,,,:.. -„,j.
(..)
'•'... 0,9
• 0 .- a,.
• 0 CO ...
Example C.
, ... .
•
,., .
' '•,, .
, •.' 0'
i(P ,39-4ti
Riparian Lines ---------77 ' i.,
, ,
.. •••'. <(/
. .
. .
. . ,
. \.. •_ ,.c) /
.. ..
, .
• ..
.•
. • .. ,,
.. .
. .
, . .
- •• stairs 208ft x 4ft wide
,.., .•• ,.. ,.. - •,b4
'• ",,,,
•......
‘-'.(•;,-fr
..... ,..,‘,) .....\4 ,
Max depth ."....71.N ........ - - ry I
A,
at low tide is 1 . .
.•
.•.' 0 i\.:
• ..
. • . •_,.. ry
. .
. . ,
. . .
.../
. .
18ft Kayak dock ......../ u'o
• , ..• 6' wide x 12' long 4 0
..
.•
,•
• 6''
With onlY 2' over 1:01
- ..
Bradle ''' .'eek water:
. ..• %I..,zt
.•

• WRIGHTSVLLE AVEME
— \--
II
NORTH BRADLEY OVERLOOK to:FclimwE
•a.....,. •.7.,:..
8....4
.,gAz,,,
_,_ A
_... ,,
` 44 43 42 41 40 T_a
..
•..
.
..,
.1.
g
« «
10•
8
S
Y ::.,
....
. _IV
< S i e
S t q 24
M a 1N
,EIS - `' :C 3 4' : , - 23 20 t9 ,—
a= _ z- - a e + j n •
i : r 3
c�
d r
'se o ." '°o ^t
'S ��- •EW LOW alEn
o,� a -
�� a $ L� BRASILEY CREEK
tss y
za= O CERNRQATE Or APPROVAL
num •
('� -s "al' _ :. cis; ASPORTIONMENT OF RP- AARIAN RIGHTS
or
it I.P. ^ZZ M .. • PARSLEY WOODS
IV G21 \l 4 LANOLINEOFt('aMl¢AIgN NC..
\I z O fAT«hst 6YM IMMETT TOWMB«R 1
MONO &Coda I IOW w/waew COM, MTh CARO-WA steers tF @ J
1
Z Atq Q g•ox 'S o pal a /O$

New Hanover County Page 1 of
I CONTACT US I HELP
New Hanover County NMC Tax Home>Tax Statement Search>Register of Deeds Home
Home Property Records
Owner Address Parcel ID Advanced
Profile PARID:R05615-006-007-000
BONNE MATTHEW P USA K 6200 BRADLEY OVERLOOK ars N CURRENT RECORD
Saie6 N 4 1 of 1 I N
Residential I erlala• Iglaing2 ® t - rRatum to Search Results
Commercial B
Misc.Improvements tr , • y
Permits rZ
Land
Values "'
Agricultural •�
Sketch
Full Legal
Exemptions �~ •.• " r
r
Original Parcel Info
Sub-parcel(s)Info10
� '
Parcel Map •!f f r, rr f� 7 _.fit
1 'Mal •-t�* +'ter �"
- y
•
g �J
.' /f V
■ .
Last GIS Data Update:28-Aug-2007
Data Copyright New Hanover County[Disclaimer] [Privacy Policy] Last Updated: 13 Nov 2007
7 Site Design Copyright 1999-2006 Akanda Group LLC.All rights reserved.

Mew Hanover County Page 1 of
I CONTACT US I HELP
New Hanover County NHC Tax Home>Tax Statement Search>Register of Deeds Home
Home Property Records
Owner Address Parcel ID Advanced
Profile PARID:R05615-006-007-000
BONNE MATTHEW P LISA K 6200 BRADLEY OVERLOOK***N CURRENT RECORD
Sales
N 1 10f1 P N
Residential Aerials Ill I® r.1 /_"1[ I►1�2 E + - I Return to Search Results
Layers♦ ICI i®� Lki
Commercial e
Misc Improvements 5 t . lr., * '
Permits `; :.., -.`/ '-N l c k «�.iy 4.A A w
Land
Values
.ram '� ; `
Agncultural
Sketch
f` • . '►F. .rt
.:* .. ` 1
Full Legal' i
Exemptions ;Av. • ray
Original Parcel Info tr * °
Sub-parcels)Info e-.. -mow
jt
Parcel Map y ` :.f� •,+� 4 • Y
!
V' : A.
it ,•0...f10 / -
/or "I"- 'e''''' :,.fir . //..
■.' ■
Last GIS Data Update:28-Aug-2007
Data Copyright New Hanover County[Disclaimer] [Privacy Policy] Last Updated: 13 Nov 2007
7 Site Design Copyright 1999-2006 Akanda Group LLC.All rights reserved.

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION/WAIVER FORM
Name of Individual Applying For Permit: Q e
Address of Property: V2C3 N, &rad Dp2Alock
(Lot or Street #, Street or Road)
\-0Y) OC_ )
(City and Coup
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to the above-referenced property. The individua
applying for this permit has described to me as shown on the attached drawing the development the
are proposing. A description or drawing, with dimensions, should be provided with this letter.
I have no objections to this proposal.
If you have objections to what is being proposed, please write the Division of Coasta
Management. 127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilminaton, NC 28405 or call 910-395-390(
within 10 days of receipt of this notice. No response is considered the same as no objection i
you have been notified by Certified Mail.
WAIVER SECTION
•
I understand that a pier, dock, mooring pilings, breakwater, boat house or boat lift must be se
bck a minimum distance of 15' from my area of riparian access - unless waived by me. (Ifyot
wish to waive the setback. You must initial the appropriate blank below.)
I do wish to waive the 15' setback requirement.
I do not wish to waive the 15' setback requirement. /. ),„,
4/J4 ' w%.4,3
fil-CAL // 5 2007
RE ED
Sian Name Date DCM WILMING C
l

'New Hanover C outy Page 1 0:
I CONTACT US I HELP
New Hanover County NHC Tax Home>Tax Statement Search>Register of Deeds Home
I
Home Property Records
Owner Address Parcel ID Advanced
Profile PARID:R05615-006-007-000
BONNE MATTHEW P USA K 6200 BRADLEY OVERLOOK***N CURRENT RECORC
Sales
1 Of 1
Residential Aerials n G1EI I'-- a® t
u ere♦ 1� t7L" ►Vill !Return to Search Result'
Commercial
Misc.Improvements { "
Permits
Land ±tQ +
Values ,.4. 4 t ' f •
/
Agricultural j/!% `
`t •
Sketch
�R r
Full Legal , ., "�,
+rf w-
Exemptions �
Original Parcel Info r '.fir•1
Sub-parcels)Info "0iF -it...1.
sue
Parcel Map �,, e 4
. • 41.1 illik ;4' -.
4-' 4 ir,
1
Last GIS Data Update:28-Aug-2007
/ Data Copyright New Hanover County[Disclaimer] [Privacy Policy] Last Updated:05 Nov 2007
7 Site Design Copyright 1999-2006 Akanda Group LLC.All rights reserved.
C
i

,91e,47 x),;me ai,.
6232 North Bradley Overlook
Wilmington NC
28403
910 509 0676
November 19, 2007
Dear Mr. Mairs
I
The purpose of this letter is to request a one month delay in the decision of
the Division of Coastal Management regarding the application of Matthew
and Lisa Bohne of 6200 North Bradley Overlook,Wilmington NC. I was
not aware of their filing for a pier/dock until yesterday evening.
Although my property is not immediately adjacent to theirs we both abut the
Bradley Creek marsh and their activity on the marsh does affect my
property and my enjoyment of the marsh and it's natural resources and
beauty.
I would hope your office would postpone your decision in order for me to
review the Bohne's proposal, ask questions and offer input into your
decision. I would appreciate for your cooperation and assistance.
Sincerely,
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON.

Page 1 of
suesteve
From: "suesteve" <[e-mail]>
To: <[e-mail]>
Cc: <[e-mail]>
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 8:53 PM
Subject: delay of pier request approval
Sue and Steven Stubblefield
6208 N. Bradley Overlook
Wilmington, NC 28403
910-2565384
[e-mail]
To: Mr. Robb Mairs
Wilmington District, Division of Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
Re: Request for one month delay in decision on pier request from Matthew and Lisa Bohne
6200 North Bradley Overlook
Dear Mr. Mairs,
The purpose of this letter is to request a one month delay in
CAMA's decision on this pier permit . We are writing this letter in haste,
because as proximate neighbors, two doors down from 6200 N. Bradley Overlook,
we were given formal notification only one half working day before the request is to
be approved by CAMA, Monday, November 19, 2007.
This seems very short notice for such a momentous decision. An
approval for the first private pier in the 20 year history of Parsley Woods
would surely be an open invitation to construct additional piers. This would
change the nature of Parsley Woods from a neighborhood dedicated to
maintaining the natural environment, to one emphasising water-front
activities.
Therefore we feel that all owners of Parsley Woods should have a
voice in the decision on the first private pier in the history of our
neighborhood. This is one of many reasons that we ask for a one month
delay in your decision.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sue and Steven Stubblefield
•
i

Margit E. Royal and Jerald F. Wolford
6212 North Bradley Overlook
Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
November 17, 2007
Mr. Robb Mairs
Wilmington District, Division of Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Dear Mr. Mairs,
Please consider the enclosed documents when reviewing a current pier approval request
from Matthew and Lisa Bohne, address 6200 North Bradley Overlook, Wilmington, NC
28403. (Parsley Woods).
We are not immediately adjacent neighbors, but are 3 doors down from this particular lot
with our property also adjoining Bradley Creek. We are very concerned about the prospe
of piers being constructed into the marsh, for all of the reasons outlined in the attached
letters. In short, not only are they environmentally disruptive, they will impact the
pollution, safety, and wildlife patterns that have existed here for over 20 years.
Riparian rights were granted to marsh-front lots in Parsley Woods at the request of
Landmark, Inc, the developer of Parsley Woods back in 1987 or 1988. The developer was
denied permission to build a multi-boat marina pier in the neighborhood, and it seems,
lobbied for the next best thing, knowing that extremely lengthy pier construction into
multiple sites of the sensitive Bradley Creek marsh would be unlikely.
For almost twenty years Parsley Woods has existed in New Hanover County as a marsh-
front neighborhood, before that being undeveloped. The extreme length needed for piers
has been a deterrent to construction, and thus vegetation and wildlife have been able to
thrive nearby. Unfortunately, our county's rapid growth and the wildfire desire of
homeowners to build near water has impacted our coastal environment in deleterious wa;
The sewage and water quality issues along our creeks play a role as well.
Unfortunately, we only found out about the Bohne's pier request this morning. We
understand the approval is pending for Monday November 19, 2007. Furthermore, we ar
scheduled to fly out of Wilmington early Monday morning for the Thanksgiving holiday. I
realise this information and its timing leaves us very little opportunity to elaborate our
further concerns. As best we could, we have tried to do so. We hope there is still an
opportunity for them to be heard before committing to one more tragic impact for Bradley
Creek.

TUESDAY,FEBRUARY 14,2006
•
' M'Area population !ulation A.
\U RaPid development ■The state plans
has skyrocketed from `\
followed by falling an oyster hatchery
' 220,000 in 1980 to eater quality. New program; a single
1, • 312,000 in 2005. '\ i gulations are in the oyster can filter 50
' i Akorks. gallons of water a day.
i' shellj j
,,,,
, shocke'd
\s, , .
\\
Closingof ocal waters to shellfishin� g
points 7.
to coast st's declining water quality
� 13� /r Topsail
Beach.
133 ?‘ �/
\ r' ;` 17 © FUTCH CREEK
� ( 173 40 / Figure Eight Island
._.1-, I Ogden /
` ?421) ) r--. / 0 PAGES CREEK
•
;'/j Leland 1� gf .� 1 -% 0 HOWE CREEK ByGareth McGrath
'-,`: 17 y-='�jN Staff writer
`, --� ��_
r—i T ;� 74
\�=— 17 .,`\Ji _Jt�L ;% ince AugustL004, all of th
''� ~ i -� between Ocean Isle Beac]
�� � ��._): -- )(' .� Y CREEK SSouthCamlinalinehavebet
i /n ; 76 rarily closed to clammers and oy:
17 ! ',,� Wilmingt n Wrightsville After adding more monitoring
)' �; �` regulators are re-evaluating the;
1 i � Beach
I; \, j f; the hopes of reopening some se
tiS ._;. (' `., `N <132I It shellfishing soon—although the In;
)39I�1'�Y \` ,. NV Waterway will likely remain do
I \ Tjp Patti Fowler,an environmental si
�� I` HEWLETTS CREEK with N.C.Shellfish Sanitation.
13 \ \\ The situation in southwestern B
� County is a symptom of what's tat
? -A-2
� r; along much of the North Caroli
K421; ` where rapid development is quickl]
.`T ., by the unintended—but well-do
-consequence falling
-- -- RECE I�, - o qu of water qu
�. ..

Tt1 esE,Pri L • I -t• 0(0 vJ I LP%L Nrc,Tett,i S TA-2.- Nt 6lnt S
J.L .JL 11.15 V1 LkJ LL1 V V C.LtA.l tJ L I ►J11V1111o111118• .
Opoints to c is declining terqualiF
v
. „// \
's� 132
Topsail
'\ 133 //'r Beach.
�17 © FUTCH CREEK
\_ 7 7 40 3 ------ // Figure Eight Island
/ Ogden
\l ('421 �� i�� 0 PAGES CREEK
11 JA^\ 1)
��� Leland �_,� 1\'J/._ 0 HOWE CREEK By Gareth McGrath
11 - } 17 '� — Staff Writer
tN ,\''..-----=z-,
7 \. (17'i it�•_.,_. V
74
s. `�;-7=— "7 ince August 2(>U4, all o
9
��'; �i� ,,, , between Ocean Isle Bc
rc \ I �� ��76 BRA C Y CREEK South Carolina line have
j ('`;\Wilmingtin
racily closed to clammers and
`87 j � \ Wrightsville After adding more monitor]
� 1 \�\ Beach regulators are re-evaluating tl
/� i� the hopes of reopening some
RUNSWIC€. `,A, 132 it shellfishing soon-although the
COUNTY ' '\\N,
I Waterway will likely remain ,
'iI 4HEWLETTS CREEK Patti Fowler,an environmenta
133 (\ .� ((I 4- with N.C.Shellfish Sanitation.
\V i` The situation in southwester?
•
-'. '2 '? RECEIVED County is a symptom of what's
,l 42 ;` DCM WILMINGTON, N� g much of the North Car
/, where rapid development is quic
1' ,( N 0 u' 19 2007 by the unintended-but well-c
-consequence of falling water
eF„ -_ New Hanover,County's six
' .=�, ;h4 have seen their water qualit
development within their watc
increased.
Statewide, almost 12,001
shellfishing waters have beer
1984, raising the number of pi
closed acres to more than 56,0(
But like the proverbial car
coal mine, the loss of healthy c
signifies more than just missed of
for fishermen.
"People move to the coast tc
tidal creeks and the Intracoasta
to enjoy the rich wildlife that
habitat," said Tom Reeder, wit
�i STAR-NEWS ru.E Division of Water Quality's We
Woi q Creelc•is one of New Hanover County's six tidal creeks,which have been
alnist eflfirely closed to shellfishing.
DAL CREEK CLOSURE BOUNDARIES N 1988 closure fl 2005 closure • Current

,
FROM 1A
WATER 4= ' *,w
CONTINUED FROM 1A ,•4E
Stormwater branch. "But if you
start losing that,what do you have "' ,.;3:a .
left?Is clear water enough?" __.
Too much to filter?
While state officials have , "'
launched a series of new measures
to try to stem —and they hope c•
eventually reverse—the gradual
decline in coastal water quality,
the current situation has been
decades in the making.
Overfishing,the loss of oyster
reefs and disease have decimated
the state's oyster catch, with
harvests plummeting from 1.8
million bushels in the early 20th MATT BORN
century to an average of 50,000 Buddy Milliken,a developer with Woodsong,shows off a
bushels this decade. strip of pervious concrete in the development in Shallotte.
The mass migration to the The concrete allows stormwater runoff to soak in.
coast in recent decades, and
more specifically the runoff from program would simplify control TIDAL CREEK CLOSURE R EC E
fertilizer to dog waste that human efforts by replacing a hodgepodge Percentage of New Hanover DCM WILMII`
intrusion generates,has further of often confusing programs with tidal creek closure(data not
exacerbated the pressure on one set of rules. The proposal available for Whiskey Creek). 1
shellfishing waters. also is a tacit admission that 1988 2005
N 0 V 1
"Back when the stormwater the current patchwork of rules closure* MI closure
rules were adopted in the late and regulations hasn't worked— ioo >oo no
1980s, I don't think anyone although some environmentalists in
envisioned the exponential think the proposed universal 89
expansion we've been seeing stormwatermanagementprogram 84
all along the North Carolina is just as lax. so
coast," Reeder said. "It's just The most controversial part 66 68
been rampant growth almost of the program would allow
everywhere." high-density development,which 60 54
The population of New would include collection systems,
Hanover,Brunswick and Pender in areas near sensitive waters. ao
counties, for example, has "We're not trying to handcuff
skyrocketed from 220,000 in 1980 development at all,"Reeder said.
to 312,000 in 2005—with most of "What we're offering is to remove 20
that growth in a narrow ribbon• some of those restrictions in
along the coast. return for making sure you
11111
Hoping to at least begin control the stormwater that your 0 e y r
addressing the problem, the project produces." \tee a\e. o� aoa �o
General Assembly last year Mike Mallin, a water-quality ae� lea Z Q

To: Greg Pittillo, president, PWOA
From: Margit Royal and Jerry Wolford
RE: recent approval of pier construction in PW
Date: Saturday November 17, 2007
Dear Greg,
As requested here are the relevant documents regarding the ARC and the
PWOA Board's response to a 2006 request for pier construction in our
neighborhood. As Dave mentioned, he has all of these in his possession.
Jerry and I, as well as the Stubblefields, were greatly disappointed to learn
the current board has recently given permission for a pier to be built in
Parsley Woods, and that this was done without any notification to the
neighborhood. We feel our objections are valid, for all of the reasons stated
in both the ARC letter of August 1, 2006, and in our personal letter to the
2006 PWOA board.
It is important to note that the ARC letter specifically references both the
responsibility and authority of the board, delineated in our by-laws and
covenants, to handle issues which affect the overall well-being of the
neighborhood, including construction approvals. This is indeed correct.
I would also like to point out that the August 14, 2006 letter which Jerry and
I submitted to the board was submitted AFTER the board reached their
decision, in order to allow objectivity during presentation of a pier request
made to the board. That board, which included 3 of the 5 current board
members, voted unanimously to deny permission for pier construction for all
the reasons stated. The ARC did the same. And by the way, the denied
proposal was also for a presumed "low visual impact" structure.
The recent hasty decision to grant permission today for the first pier
construction in Parsley Woods was done without notice to the neighborhood.
Since the introduction of piers will greatly change the tone and ambiance of
Parsley Woods, and affect the long-standing enjoyment of some residents'
properties, we feel this represents a large negligence of board responsibility.
As recently illustrated at the November 13, 2007 annual meeting, lack of
information and involvement in other PWOA decisions of major impact drew
loud objections from the neighborhood.
You and Dave Puett told me today that the board knew of the current pier

the future pier construction requests sure to come. You also indicated that
the Bohnes said their permit, initially scheduled to be signed off by CAMA on
11/26/07, was now to be approved on Monday 11/ 19/07. The Stubblefields
Were notified on Friday 11/16/07, by email from the Bohnes. The email was
sent at 10:43 a.m. As Sue and Steve said, like most of us, they don't check
their email "hourly", thus they didn't know anything about this situation
until last night. Sue shared it with me this morning.
In other words, no one else had an opportunity to share their concerns with
the board. The fact that the board requested notification of one other
neighbor, the Stubblefields, (apparently the immediately adjacent neighbors
were notified via CAMA and had no objections) became a moot point when
that notification came at a time when no recourse was reasonably available.
From everything I've learned today about the current pier request, there
seems to have been quite a bit of back street maneuvering: the CAMA
permits sought before notice to the PWOA board and ARC; the board
withholding the issue from the membership; the current board issuing
approval based on the inaccurate belief that it has no authority over
construction within the neighborhood any way; and the 11th hour "Oh by the
way" email notice to the Stubblefields only.
We appreciate the time you took to speak with us about our concerns today.
We don't expect a reply to this letter, but we are always willing to share in
discussion of this issue moving forward. We have filed our objection with
CAMA as well.
Sincerely,
Margit Royal and Jerry Wolford
CC this letter only: PWOA Board: Marcus Bradsher; Dave Puett; Dean
Meisel; Jimmy Wallace
CC all documents: Sue and Steve Stubblefield; CAMA

• RECEIVED
Parsley Woods Home Owners Association DCM WILMINGTON, N
Architectural Review Committee Meeting
August 1 , 2006 NOV 1 9 2007
le meeting came to order at 6:00 pm. All members of the Architectural Review
)mmittee (ARC) were in attendance, including Dave Puett, Chairman of and Board
aison for the ARC, Marge Gates, Tom Wallace, and Jerry Cooper.
ie ARC met in order to review Thomas and Marsha Blount's request for approval "to
instruct a private pier into Bradley Creek from Lot 43 Parsley Woods, address 6216
Drth Bradley Overlook" (Blount memo).
Iscussion was focused on the specifics of the Blount's proposal, namely construction of
approximateY 750' long narrow walkway elevated 3' above the marsh substrate and
rminating at an elevated pier built into Bradley Creek [along the] assigned riparian rights
>rridor" (Blount memo) deeded to this lot by the Parsley Woods Developer in 1988.
owever, the ARC also remained cognisant of the fact that this is the first homeowner
quest for construction of a long private pier to reach the "navigable" portion of Bradley
reek. As such, the ARC recognizes that its recommendation to the Parsley Woods
oard of Directors (PWBOD) has implications beyond the Blount plan and may be used
3 precedent for future similar requests.
he ARC apprecited the Blount's attempt to minimize the "visual [and] environmental
npacts on the marsh [and] storm damage" (Blount memo)with their low-profile design.
lowever, after much discussion, the ARC voted unanimously NOT to approve this
;quest.
he reasoning is as follows and is based on the wording and implications found in the
'arsley Woods Declaration of Restrictions (PWDOR).
Ls outlined in the introductory paragraph of the PWDOR, it is the responsibility of the
>eveloper, a responsibility now assumed by the PWBOD, to "secure to each lot owner
le full benefit and enjoyment of his home." (PWDOR) In 1988, now 18 years ago, the
ght to construct a pier was felt to be one of these benefits, as implied by the assignment
f riparian rights corridors to marsh front lots and by restrictions on pier construction
lescribed in the PWDOR.
oowever, the Developer also recognized that individual homeowner activity can have a
iegative impact on adjacent neighbors and on the neighborhood as a whole. For this
eason, the PWDOR also assigns the Board the responsibility to impose "no greater
actrirtinn "non the free and undisturbed use of [each lot owner's] home than is necessary to

With regard to concern over adjacent lot impact, as the Blounts correctly point out in their
request, the riparian rights corridors are not perpendicular to the lots themselves "given the
meandering nature of Bradley Creek in the project area" (Parsley Woods CAMA permit
April 1988). These corridors are identified in Map Book 31, Page 82, of the New Hanover
County Registry, which is included in the Blount proposal. This map shows that the
proposed Blount pier would cross the marsh view lines of Lots 44 and 45, a point cleary
demonstrated by aerial photographs included with the proposal. The homeowners of Lot
45, 6212 North Bradley Overlook, Margit Royal and Jerry Wolford, have provided the
ARC with a written statement that the proposed Blount pier would significantly interfere with
their enjoyment of the marsh and its habitat. Additionally, on further inspection of Map 31, it
is apparent that most of the assigned riparian rights corridors cross adjacent neighbors'view
lines. In fact, for lots 29-33, the access corridors make almost immediate right angle turns to
reach water, passing directly in front of 5 or 6 other lots. The ARC considers this
arrangement unacceptable.
Finally, with regard to the "tone of the neighborhood," the ARC accepts that this is a vague
statement, but feels that this "tone" has been defined over the past 2 decades. Parsley
Woods is a neighborhood dedicated to maintaining a natural environment as much as
possible. This fact is reflected by the tough and enforced tree preservation policy,
landscaping requirements, common building paint choices, and street lighting and sign
design, all selected to enhance the natural setting. Many Parsley Woods homeowners
have selected this neighborhood specifically because of its appreciation and protection of
this natural setting, including its unobstructed marshfront. The ARC considers the construction
of long piers to access Bradley Creek for motorized craft to be in opposition to this overall
neighborhood emphasis.
In summary, although water access by long pier construction was a benefit originally granted
to individual homeowners by the Developer of Parsley Woods in 1988, it is the opinion of
the current ARC that piers along the riparian rights corridors, as they exist, would result in
the unacceptable obstruction of many homeowners views and that piers in general are not
in keeping with this neighborhood's emphasis on maintaining a natural setting. In this case,
the ARC feels that its responsibilty is to protect the interests of the neighborhood as a
whole, over the rights of the individual, and we therefore recommend that pier construction
not be approved.
C MW LMJ rE
Respectively submitted, i
NOV 1 9 ?cry?
David Puett
.5j
Mar ret t

Parsley Woods Owners Association
Board of Directors
Mr. and Mrs. Thomas Blount RECEIVED
6216 North Bradley Overlook ACM WILMINGTON, N Wilmington, NC 28403
Nov 1 9 2007
August 10, 2006
Dear Marsha and Thomas,
The Board greatly appreciates your efforts in proposing a pier plan that
minimizes the visual impact of its presence on the Bradley Creek Marsh
and neighbors' homes. Per the PWOA By-laws and Restrictions, the
Board is charged with considering not just the immediate architectural
implications of any proposal, but also the repercussions which such a
structure will have for the ambiance, safety and enjoyment of Parsley
Woods by all residents.
After extended discussion, the Board voted unanimously to accept the
recommendations of the PWOA Architectural Review Committee, and
thus must deny your request for pier construction. The reasons for the
denial are well described in the ARC meeting minutes of August 1, 2006.
In addition, we point out that for nearly two decades, Parsley Woods has
existed solely as a marsh-front community. The introduction of piers,
and the activity which they engender, would negatively impact the
desired tone and well-being of the neighborhood, which have been
carefully protected for the past eighteen years.
We hope you understand this decision, which the Board feels best
represents the present and future well-being of the entire neighborhood.
Sincerely and Respectfully,
(i'j
M�(r g its E. Ro a g y , President, PWOA Dean Meisel, Vice President, PWOA

Margit E. Royal & Jerald F. Wolford
6212 North Bradley Overlook
Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone: [phone] 910-256-9263
To: Parsley Woods Owners Association Board: Dean Meisel; Dave Puett; Bob Baird;
Marcus Bradsher
From: Margit Royal and Jerry Wolford
RE: The Blount's pier proposal
?August 14,2006
Dear fellow Board members,
I'm attaching FYI a copy of the letter date July 21, 2006 which Jerry and I submitted to
the ARC prior to their meeting on Monday August 1,2006. I waited to share it with you
until after the Board met and officially received the ARC recommendations,and until we
(you) had a chance to ask your questions and air your own concerns.
I don't expect a reply; I just wanted you to be informed. I made only one copy,and
hoped that it could percolate among you along with the revised Board letter to the
Blounts. I would be glad to make an individual copy for anyone that would like one;just
let me know. Otherwise,this can come back to me with the fully signed letter.
Sincerely A
Margit E. R i,, resident, PWOA
CeIVEL
'ACM WILMINr;T-n�
Nov 1 9 ?op

Margit E. Royal & Jerald F. Wolfora
6212 North Bradley Overlook
Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
RECEIVE
Dr. Dave Pue DCM WILMINGTC
U
Board Liaison;Architectural Review Committee NOV 1 9 20(
Parsley Woods Owners Association
6317 S. Bradley Overlook
Wilmington,NC 28403
July 21, 2006
Dear Dave,
As you are aware,our neighbors,Thomas and Marsha Blount,are requesting review of
their proposal to put in a pier/walkway across 750 feet of Bradley Creek Marsh to the
small channel on the opposite side,ending in a platform pier with two manual lifts. They
cite the deeded Riparian Rights which their property, and every marsh front lot in Parsley
Woods has,and they reference the Declaration of Restrictions paragraph stating the
manner in which piers should be constructed as justification for their project.
Riparian rights, per statute, are"the right to have the water by your property
undiminished in quantity or quality." In New Hanover County,that right has most often
been interpreted in matters whereby a lot owner desires to construct a pier. The Blounts
asked the previous owners of their property (the Schrams) if they could construct a pier
once they had bought the property. Mrs. Schram asked me,both as a next door neighbor
and as the then-president of the Parsley Woods Owners Association(PWOA). I said no,
that would never be allowed in Parsley Woods.
We have lived in our home in Parsley Woods since July 1990,and are very disheartened
that anyone would even consider such an extreme disruption of the natural beauty and
environment which the Bradley Creek Marsh provides to our entire neighborhood. As
Richard Schickel, contributor to Time Magazine said in a July 17,2006 essay titled
Nothing to Laugh About,"Excess is always wretched, whether we're talking executive-
compensation packages or some guy trying to squeeze his Hummer into a parking space
clearly labeled COMPACT."
We do appreciate the Blount's consideration in contacting us personally just before they
__ ."r 'reel UPC We have made it clear

RECEIVEI
DCM WILMINGTOP
NOV 1 9 2007
r
Environmental. Once the first"pier" goes in, it will trigger a succession of other
homeowners who will want to do the same thing. Thomas himself stated that either
CAMA or a colleague of his at the Corps of Engineers told him as much, while he was
doing his preliminary staking. A friend of ours who owns a marina, and another friend
with legal expertise in boating and navigable water issues responded identically upon
hearing what was being proposed by a single lot owner. Thus Parsley Woods could
expect up to 19 additional piers of nearly equal(or perhaps even greater) length
(Nineteen is the number of marsh-front lots in Parsley Woods). It's painful to imagine
the impact which such a dramatic shift in thinking will mean for the neighborhood.
There will be a forest of pilings, planks, watercraft activity,human activity and pollution,
all crammed into what nature never intended as truly navigable water.
CAMA requires that piers must reach"navigable water"so that sensitive marsh areas are
"minimally"disturbed;only 700-800 foot piers can reach the small channel on the
opposite side of the marsh. Even so,there will be a number of hours during everyday
low tides, when even the smallest water craft cannot traverse the marsh substrate, except
perhaps jet skis. The amount of pier disruption to the marsh overwhelmingly outweighs
the usefulness of what the Blounts propose.
• Per the Blount's proposal,there will be approximately 110 pilings for the pier
walkway, spaced at about every 7 ''A feet,excluding those for the dock.
• Per Thomas's drawing,every piling will have a 2x4 foot pile stabilizer on each
side of it, for a total of 220 beams flattening and,destroying habitat
• 700-800 feet of marsh grass either"shaded" or crushed by piling supports, is a lot
of marsh to destroy
• 700-800 feet of pier walkway is equal to 2 ''A football fields; Johnny Mercer's
Pier at Wrightsville Beach is not quite as long,but provides a good visual
reference for length.
• We are concerned that as the construction process might proceed,that the
specifications outlined in the Blount's proposal will be exceeded for a variety of
reasons,and the result will be much more intrusive than originally suggested.
Neighborhood Ambiance and Views. The potential for noisy disruption of the
neighborhood during a long construction process and ever thereafter with subsequent
piers and use by motorized craft, is a concern, particularly if one by one,others join the
parade. The Blount's proposal for a 3-foot high plank system without railings and only
nineteen inches wide, is a recognized attempt to minimize the visual impact which their
walkway/pier will have on the marsh.
• The negative impact to ambience and property values throughout the
. . . , . ,__ __• ,v,arch nrrllrC AC A rectal

RECEI
DCM WILMIN(
NOV 1 9
• The Blounts correctly quote the Parsley Woods Declaration of Restrictions which
state"...it is the desire of the undersigned,to ensure the use of said property for
attractive residential purposes only, to prevent the impairment of the
attractiveness of the property, to maintain the desired tone of the community, and
thereby to secure to each lot owner the full benefit and enjoyment of his home
with no greater restriction upon the free and undisturbed use of his lot than is
necessary to ensure the same advantages to the other lot owners;..." However,
their pier and the inevitable succession of other similar structures will destroy the
peaceful nature of our neighborhood and marsh.
• When hurricanes damage existing piers,we will all either be subject to the endless
disruption of repair projects,or the abandoned original projects in a state of
disrepair,as the effort and expense to rebuild outweighs the usefulness of these
structures.
• Parsley Woods was never meant to be a boating community. The original
developer was denied a marina permit by CAMA;their next best effort was to go
through the motions of having each marsh front lot deed with Riparian Rights,
promoting sales with such an enticement. We in fact asked about the possibility
of building a pier on our own property at the time of purchase,and were advised
by knowledgeable people,that this would be such a costly undertaking, both in
terms of money and environmental impact,that it would not be worthwhile, nor
necessarily allowed.
Neighborhood safety. The presence of any pier serves as a point of entry and hasty exit
for non-residents. This concern exists within any waterfront community. In Parsley
Woods we've had our own experiences with unauthorized persons on the community pier
and gazebo. The construction process itself will provide knowledge of the who, what and
where of water access
When hurricanes or other high tide storms come through,the potential for rising winds
and waters to tear planks off their foundations and send them flying into neighbors' roofs,
windows, siding and yards is very real. Although the Blounts state their 3-foot high and
19 inch wide planks will minimize the chance that such destruction will happen, no one
can guarantee a safe outcome. We personally have built a pier, in a major waterfront
community(Figure Eight Island),and have, from 1994 through 2005, lived through the
effects of storm damage—floating docks lifted up and carried off into other's properties;
piers uprooted and torn off their foundations to do similar damage; boats crashed into
homes,and so on, not to mention the direct toll that this debris and the subsequent
rebuilding process takes,once again,on our neighborhood ambiance and environment.
• As stated in their proposal,their pier design will "...hopefully reduce the damage
. _ ,, �___ __.. L. A_c. rt Irmo etahili7ina

the risks and responsibilities associated with such storms, including one's
personal property, and that of one's neighbors.
• Bradley Creek isn't the same creek it was nearly 20 years ago either. If one were
to try and grant Riparian Rights to our lots today, they would no doubt be denied.
CAMA may deny the permit. Trying to gain meaningful water access from most
of these marsh front lots is akin to "the guy trying to squeeze his hummer into a
space marked COMPACT."
• In all of the years that Parsley Woods has existed,to the best of our knowledge,
no one has ever requested to build a pier.
One of our greatest pleasures is sitting on our deck, or in our home,watching the herons,
egrets, swans, osprey and other aquatic birds amble through the marsh, feeding and
nesting. We do this almost daily, as we imagine many other Parsley Woods neighbors
do. It is one of the primary reasons we bought our property 16 years ago. Having the
Blount's pier walkway traverse the length of our entire view shed would be devastating to
the value and enjoyment of our home not to mention the well-being of the marsh. They
have a number of choices available for reasonable water access nearby; once piers begin
to obstruct the Bradley Creek Marsh, we no longer have a choice—the ambiance is gone
forever.
For all of the foregoing reasons, we strongly urge the Architectural Review committee
and the PWOA Board to deny construction of this extreme walkway pier,and all others
of similar nature. As those of us who have lived here for 16+years know, the"desired
tone"of Parsley Woods has been one of an upscale peaceful neighborhood,carefully
tended to preserve the natural environment while providing a haven for all residents. It is
•
simply "necessary"to deny this request so that the neighborhood doesn't lose what has
been so carefully preserved for all lot owners.
Sincerely, ,t( /
Margit E. Roy - d Jerald F. Wolford
Attachment: June 26, 2006 article from the Wilmington Star News
which illustrates the principal of how important preserving the natural
environment of a neighborhood can be
Cc: Deborah and Ty Watts RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC