NCDOT - 75975B

❑CAMA /❑'DREDGE & FILL p No. 75975 A B C D
GENERAL PERMIT ) Previous permit#
❑New ❑Modification ❑Complete Reissue El Partial Reissue Date previous permit issued
As authorized by the State of North Carolina, Department of Environmental Quality +
and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant to I SA_NCAC ' ,
_ - I� Rules attached.
Applicant Name L C
Address 'W
Phone # ( )_
Authorized Agent
Affected Cw
AEC(s): L1OEA
❑ PWS:
ORW: yes /no
State ZIP
E-Mail
Ll EW ❑; PTA ❑ ES ©-PTS
LIHHF ❑IH ❑UBA ❑N/A
PNA yes /'no
Protect ocatlon. ounty -
Street Address/ State Road/ Lot #(s)
Subdivision
ZIP
Phone # ( ) River Basin
Adj. Wtr. Body ( _ (nat /man /unkn)
j; i
Closest Maj. Wtr. Body
Type of Project/ Activity
... (S ale: - )
Pier (dock) length
Fixed Platform(s)
Float
Fing
Groi
91A
BulkBasin
Boat
Boat
Jff
BeachBulldozingOtheShorelineLengthSAV: notsureyes;n�Moratorium:n/ayeshoyPhotos:yes;noWaiver Attached. yes h4)
A.building permit may be required by: O See note on back regarding River Basin rules.
( Note Local Planning jurisdiction)Notes/Special Conditions
Agent or Applicant Printed Name
Sadcom
ignature ••* Please replianc statement on back of permit"
Signature
Printed Name
Application Fee(s)
Check#
Issuing Date
Expiration Date

LFYCAMA / I�i6REDGE &FILL (6f 3 v t,� No. 75975
A © C D
�NERAL PERMIT IAA $0 Previous permit# —
ew ❑Modif cation ❑Complete Reissue ❑Partial Reissue bllg
.4 Date previous permit issued
As authorized by the State of North Carolina, Department of Environmental Quality © -7 I 1 I 0 O
and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant to 15A NCAC // T J"
f Doer
ules att}ched.
Applicant Name N LDo r/ Project Location: County i t� Address -70 6 H511rlarol t S� Street Address/ State Road/ Lot #(s) r 1
City fI. State N G ZIP 1% 607 oNi-g Ji-71 J{rr,x. OJM;14:'e N• a7 j1L /17"1-
Phone # (�1►`1) ! !�' $S81 E-Mail Subdivision
Authorized Agent BzrtJ:min 9•+ City hl roe- jNc- ZIP
❑eW
❑EW kid A
Affected
AEC(s):
❑ OEA
❑ HHF ❑ IH
❑ PWS:
ORW:
yes / 19
PNA yes /0
Type of Project/ Activity YL
Pier (dock) length "—
Fixed Platform(s) _
Floating Platform(s)
Finger pier(s)
Groin length
number
Bulkhead/ Nprap length
avg distance offshore —
max distance offshore
Basin, channel
cubic yards
Boat ramp
Boathouse/ Boatlift
Beach Bulldozing
Other 3s'n �J
Sao• r.J.-i.,•�..
Shoreline Length
SAV: not sure yes no
Moratorium: n/a yes
Photos: es no
Waiver Attached: yes
DES 3}/T5. Phone#() River BasinTr��""�j/mob
❑ UBA ❑ N/A Adj. Wtr. Body (JI 'to D`" r •w� naCn t man nkn
Closest Mal. Wtr. Body fa" / .
s )01 wv'k x 10' o^
;lnc.le•w.l'^-IV
II �
(;ofs� l��e hr6
(Scale: l� I
r
A building permit may be required by:
( Note Local Planning jurisdiction)
Notes/ Special Conditions l
Agent or Applicant Printed Name
L`_f See note on back regarding River Basin rules.
L L I
in�
?tV' and a117,✓ ftkai111^/ prA•11 J,_ 1µ
AA( jf,•,C( �1+�- �/�J•T`llr�[ ,i T/�h )Swrri.
Signature ** Please read compliance statement on back of permit**
eroo, o0 T79f-I-R,qs
IA Wil-k IfI"VJ,
D . h14. w
Permit Officerri ame
Signature q ��
5?_9r')-D S- I
Application Fee(s)
Check# Issuing Date
Expiration Date

NC Division of Coastal Mgt. Application Computer Sheet, Page 3 of 4)
Applicant:
Date: y `j
Describe below the HABITAT disturbances for the application. All values should match the name, and units of measurement
found in your Habitat code sheet.
TOTAL Sq. Ft
FINAL Sq. Ft.
TOTAL Feet
FINAL Feet
(Applied for.
(Anticipated final
(Applied for.
(Anticipated final
DISTURB TYPE
Disturbance total
disturbance.
Disturbance
disturbance.
Habitat Name
Choose One
includes any
Excludes any
total includes
Excludes any
anticipated
restoration
any anticipated
restoration and/or
restoration or
and/or temp
restoration or
temp impact
temp impacts)
impact amount)
temp impacts)
amount
W, {' r
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ElOther 2'
f) f -0
l '3J--b
A(. ,t W4'W-4'/
Dredge ❑ Fill [Both ❑ Other ❑
NJiKc
JdA-IJi
Dredge [Fill [I Both [I Other ❑
7 D
o
ll J
ki o `l Weli•+-l/
Dredge Fill [9' Both ❑ Other ❑
,(,
l A
0
tA.rA-CC
4 o ri V A-41'
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other [9'
5ro 44
O
14&
M✓�)
Dredge ❑ Fill[] Both ❑ Other 2r
M36
0
iitr>
,�,/
Dredge iy Fill El Both ❑ Other ❑
N c,
Dredge B Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
H+�
(s+r• "^^I
Dredge [IFill 2 Both ❑ Other ❑
�Zr�a3
�1tI`►3
)�f1,
Dredge ❑ Fill Both ❑ Other ❑
' 01
3j 0 o
�f�
Dredge El Fill El Both ❑ Other
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
252-808.2808 :: 1.888.4RCOAST :: www.nccoastalmanaaement.net revised: 0215110

TGS
ENGINEERS
OR
m
cn
00
m
cn
r`
r`
in
r,
m
X
LL
00
m
00
of
m
in
m
z
0
x
a
m m
cr o
m m
7
O ttl
Q Z
a p
O s
N N
o N�
February 12, 2020
Mr. Stephen Lane
N.C. Division of Costal Management
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
Subject: CAMA General Permit
Replacement of Bridge No.
14 on SR 1971 (Durham Creek Rd) over Branch of
Durham Creek in Beaufort County, NC
State Project 17.BP.2.R.95 (Formerly STIP No. B-4709)
Dear Mr. Lane,
The North Carolina Department of Transportation Highway Division 2 is submitting the attached
CAMA General Permit application for the replacement of bridge no. 14 on SR 1971 (Durham
Creek Rd) over Branch of Durham Creek. TGS Engineers has been contracted by NCDOT for
the design and permitting of this bridge replacement project.
The proposed project will replace the aging existing structure over Branch of Durham Creek at
the same location. Traffic will be maintained using an off -site detour during construction, with
the proposed bridge being built using top -down construction. The proposed bridge maintains the
existing clearance over Brach of Durham Creek. No direct discharge into Branch of Durham is
proposed for this project. The project is in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin.
Impacts to wetlands and surface waters, as well as riparian buffer impacts, have been minimized
to the maximum extent practicable for this proposed project.
NCDOT request that the proposed work be authorized under a Coastal Area Management Act
General Permit. Adjacent riparian landowner forms signed by all the adjacent property owners
has been included in this application. Per Michael Aman, PE, the Division 2 Bridge Program
Manager, authorization to debit the $800 Permit Application Fee from State Project Number
17BP.2.R.95 is hereby given.
Please contact me if you have any questions or need any additional information.
Sincerely,
Ben Henegar, PE
Hydraulic Design Engineer
TGS Engineers
RECEIVED
FEB 19 ZOO
®CM-MHD CITY

1GS
ENGINEERS
rry
m
00
m
m
0)
rn
LL
00
0
00
of
c�
n
rn
0)
rn
w
z
0
a
Y
M
-C O
� [D
0 (U
o U
�Q Z
- O
O s
= CU CO
O N
Attachments:
1. Project Narrative
2. DCM MP-1 & MP-5 Forms
3. Signed Agent Authorization Form
4. Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification and Tar -Pamlico Buffer
Authorization Letter
5. CAMA Landowner Letter, Signed Adjacent Riparian Landowner Statement
Forms & Notification Receipts
6. P-1 Sheet (wetland & buffer impacts with erosion control measures shown)
7. Permit Drawings (with Stormwater Management Plan)
8. NCDOT Historic Architecture and Landscapes No Survey Form
9. NCDOT No Archaeological Survey Required Form
RECEIVED
FEB 19 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

State Project 17BP.2.R.95 CAMA General Permit Application
February 12, 2020
1.0 Project Narrative
Purpose and Need
The purpose of the project is to address a fifty -three -year -old bridge with deteriorating timber
substructure and low posted weight limit.
Project Description
Replacement of Bridge No. 060014 on SR 1791 (Durham Creek Rd) over Branch of Durham Creek in
Beaufort County, NC. The proposed 90' long by 30' wide two -span bridge would replace the existing 61'
long by 30' wide two -span bridge at the same location. The proposed grade will be about 1.5' above
existing grade at the crossing.
Bridge No. 060014 is within the Tar -Pamlico River Basin and shall adhere to the Tar -Pamlico Buffer
Rules. The proposed bridge will have no direct discharge into Branch of Durham Creek. Stormwater
runoff from the south approach of the proposed bridge flows to two traffic bearing grated inlets on both
sides of the roadway where it will be diffused with a rip -rap pad at the outlet of the proposed pipe. The
proposed deck runoff will outlet outside of buffers, treated by a grass Swale before discharging into the
wetland.
Equipment to be used includes cranes, excavators, dump trucks, and paving equipment.
Wetland Delineations
The wetlands at the project site were originally delineated by Carolina Ecosystems, Inc. for the July 2015
Natural Resources Technical Report (NRTR). The wetland delineation was updated in November 2019
following the October 30" site visit with NCDCM, NCDEQ, and NCDOT. A CAMA wetland was delineated
in the northwest quadrant by NCDCM, the 404 wetlands in the northwest and southwest quadrants
were redelineated by NCDOT and verified by USACE.
Summary of Impacts
Proposed impacts to jurisdictional areas total <0.01 acre (83 sf) of permanent 404 wetland impacts and
0.08 acre (3374 sf) of temporary wetland impacts (hand clearing). No permanent impacts to the CAMA
wetland are proposed. Also, there are no permanent or temporary surface water impacts for the
project. Proposed impacts to riparian buffers include 0.05 acre (2305 sf) in zone 1 and 0.03 acre (1305
sf) in zone 2.
Project Schedule
State project 17BP.2.R.95 is scheduled to be let in April 2020.
RECEIVED
FFB .19 2020
DCB "MHD CITY

State Project 1713P.2.11.95
February 12, 2020
Project Location
Legend
= Project S" Area
State Project
_µ. 17BP.2.R.95
rj
r A�
,
0 02 0.4 0.8
i naies
CAMA General Permit Application
S
j}
4
TN
SGS Tq"WayMK QUad Al ,.NC
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Date: 1a3-201e
Beaufort Canty, NC
Replace Brk1ge No. 13 on SR 1791
Figure
over Tan Swamp
176P.2.R.95
Project Coordinates
Latitude
Longitude
35.36308
-76.86976
REGEIV 1=u
2 FEB 19 2020
®CM-MH® CITY

State Project 17BP.2.R.95
February 12, 2020
Project Utilities
LAMA General Permit Application
Tideland EMC— Tideland EMC has a 3-phase (horizontal construction) overhead power line on the west
side of SR 1791 within the project limits. To gain maximum clearance potential, Tideland EMC is
relocating one pole, replacing one pole, and converting the creek crossing to vertical construction, with
a minimum clearance of 30 ft above the normal water surface elevation (NWSEL) of the creek. No
communication utilities will be attached to the power poles.
Contact: John Marsh, [e-mail], 800-637-1079 ext. 4324
CenturyLink Telepone —CenturyLink has two underground lines (west and east sides of SR 1791), two
pedestals (west and east sides of SR 1791), and two poles with an aerial crossing of Branch of Durham
Creek (east side of SR 1791). Centrylink is abandoning all underground cables in conflict with the
proposed bridge construction and re -boring new cable to their existing poles to clear the conflicts. The
existing poles and overhead crossing of the creek are to remain in service and has a minimum clearance
of 15 ft above the normal water surface elevation (NWSEL) of the creek.
Contact: Rod Medlin, [e-mail], 252-439-1932
Beaufort County Water Department — Beaufort County has an 8 in PVC, SDR 21 water main on the west
side of SR 1791 in the construction limits of the project. The water main will be in conflict with the
guardrail installations and a will require relocation. Beaufort County has requested that NCDOT place
their design and construction efforts in the NCDOT construction contract. The proposed watermain will
be directionally bored a minimum 10' below the bed elevation of Branch of Durham Creek.
Contact: Erick Jennings, [e-mail]. NC.US, 252-402-6547
Please see 7.0 Permit Drawings for plan and profile of the proposed utilities for the project.
RECEIVED
FEB 19 2020
®CM-MHD CITY

State Project 17BP.2.R.95
February 12, 2020
2.0 DCM MP-1 & MP-5 Forms
CAMA General Permit Application
Receive,)
FEB 19 2020
DCiW-MHD CITY

UCM MP-1
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
(last revised 12/27106)
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1. Primary Applicant/ Landowner Information
Business Name
Ncdot Division 2
Project Name (if applicable)
17BP.2.R.95 (Beaufort Bridge 14)
Applicant 1: First Name
Michael
MI
C
Last Name
Amen
Applicant 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
If additional applicants, please attach an additional page(s) with names listed.
Mailing Address
1037 W.H. Smith Boulevard
PO Box
1587
City
Greenville
State
NC
ZIP
278351587
Country
USA
Phone No.
252-439-2812 ext.
FAX No.
252-830-3352
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
[e-mail]
2. Agent/Contractor Information
Business Name
TGS Engineers
Agentl Contractor 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Benjamin
J
Henegar
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
706 Hillsborough Street, Suite 200
Raleigh
NC
ZIP
Phone No. 1
Phone No. 2
27603
919 - 773 - 8887
ext. 123
ext.
FAX No.
Contractor #
919 773 8839
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
[e-mail]
RECEIVED
<Form continues on back>
19 2020
252 aus.zn;z .. I-tG3-4R-OAST .. www,nccoastIImanageo: DCM-MHD CITY

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 2 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
3. Project Location
County (can be multiple)
Street Address
State Rd. #
Beaufort
SR 1971 (Durham Creek Rd) at Branch of Durham Creek
1971
Subdivision Name
City
State
Zip
N/A
Aurora
NC
27806 -
Phone No.
Lot No.(s) (if many, attach additional page with list)
N/A - - ext.
N/A, I I ,
a. In which NC river basin is the project located?
b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
Tar -Pamlico
Branch of Durham Creek
c. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade?
J. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
®Natural ❑Manmade ❑Unknown
Pamlico River
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
f. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
[]Yes ENo
work falls within.
N/A
4.
Site Description
a.
Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.)
b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.)
230
78,520 sf (1.8 ac)
c.
Size of individual lot(s)
d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
N/A, I I
NWL (normal water level)
(If many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list)
5 ft ❑NHW or ®NWL
e.
Vegetation on tract
Riverine Swamp Forest with coastal wetalnd in northwest quadrant.
f.
Man-made features and uses now on tract
Existing 2-lane bridge on SR 1971.
g.
Identify and describe the existing land uses adiacent to the proposed project site.
Undeveloped swamp / forest.
h.
How does local government zone the tract?
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
N/A
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
❑Yes []No ENA
j.
Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? ❑Yes ENo
k.
Hasa professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. EYes []No ❑NA
If yes, by whom? NCDOT HEU
I.
Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a ❑Yes ENo ❑NA
National Register listed or eligible property?
<Form continues on next page> RECEIVED
FEB 19 20'l1
.o-

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 3 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
m. (i) Are there wetlands on the site? ®Yes ❑No
(ii) Are there coastal wetlands on the site? ®Yes [-]No
(iii) If yes to either (i) or (ii) above, has a delineation been conducted? ®Yes []No
(Attach documentation, if available)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
No wastewater treatment facilites are located within the project area.
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
No water supply source is present within the project area.
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems.
Existing ditches outlet into wetland before reaching Branch of Durham Creek.
5. Activities and Impacts
a.
Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use? ❑Commercial ®PubliclGovernment
❑Private/Community
b.
Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
The purpose of the project is to address a fifty -three -old bridge with deteriorating timber substructure and low posted weight
limit. The proposed 90' long by 30' wide two -span bridge would replace the existing 61' long by 30' wide two -span bridge at
the same location.
c.
Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
Traffic will be maintained using an off -site detour, with the proposed bridge built using top -down construction. Equipment to
be used includes cranes, excavatiors, dump trucks, and paving equipment. This equipment will be stored on -site in upland
areas.
d.
List all development activities you propose.
Replace/leglhen bridge; Remove portion of existing road fill to improve bridge hydraulic conveyance and connect upstream
and downstream floodplains inside the proposed bridge opening. Addition of fill due to raising of the existing road grade.
The grade was raised to maintain the the existing bridge low chord elevation.
e.
Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? Maintenance
f.
What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project? 0.7 ❑Sq.Ft or ®Acres
g.
Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area ®Yes []No ❑NA
that the public has established use of?
h.
Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
The proposed bridge will have no direct discharge into Branch of Durham Creek. Stormwater runoff from the south approach
of the proposed bridge will flow to two traffic bearing grated inlets on both sides of the roadway where it will be diffused with
a rip -rap pad at the outlet of the proposed pipe. The proposed deck runoff with outlet outside of buffers, treated by a grass
swale before discharging into wetland. The existing ditches that outlet into wetland outside the buffers are unaffected by the
project.
i.
Will wastewater or stormwater be discharged into a wetland? ®Yes ❑No ❑NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water? ®Yes [:]No ❑NA
j.
Is there any mitigation proposed? []Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal.
<Form continues on back>
Ktzutivtu
FEB 19 2020
2 5 2 . 8 0 8 zdud .. 1-,530-ao;�•"AlZ: Al.,,, 1.1, ,.;,.,1„,,,,,,�:, DCM-MHUCITY

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 4 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
6. Additional Information
In addition to this completed application form, (MP-1) the following items below, if applicable, must be submitted in order for the application
package to be complete. Items (a) — (f) are always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
instruction booklet on how to properly prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
f. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name Robert P. Pulliam, Jr. Phone No. 919-454-1279
Address 514 Bexley Bluff Ln, Cary, NC 27513
Name GAE Enterprises, Inc. (Gilbert M. Evett, Sr, Alma S. Evett) Phone No. 252-943-8597
Address 108 Pinetree Dr., Washington, NC 27889
Name Phone No.
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, if applicable.
I. Wetland delineation, if necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10), if necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
1 7. Certification and Permission to Enter on Land
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of
my knowledge.
Date Z—�Z'Zd Print Name
Signature
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed project.
❑DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information ®DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts RECEIVED
❑DCM MP-3 Upland Development
❑DCM MP-4 Structures Information FEB 19, 2020
DCM-MHD CITY
252-808-2808 .. 1-888 4RCOAST .. www.nccoa stalmanageme ut. net

Form OCM MP-5
BRIDGES and CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
1. BRIDGES ❑This section not applicable
a. Is the proposed bridge: b. Water body to be crossed by bridge:
❑Commercial EPublic/Government ❑Private/Community Branch of Durham Creek
c. Type of bridge (construction material):
2 Span - 21" Cored Slab
e. (i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? ®Yes []No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge: 61 ft
(iii) Width of existing bridge: 30 ft
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge: 4.1 ft
from NWL.
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain) All of the existing bridge will be removed.
Portion of existing road fill will be removed.
9 Length of proposed bridge: 90 ft
i. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow? EYes ❑No
If yes, explain: Longer bridge and removed fill will improve
bridge conveyance and reduce velocities.
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge: 4.2 ft from
NWL.
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing no navigable
waters? ❑Yes ENo
If yes, explain: N/A
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at NLW or NWL:
5.5ftatNWL.
f. (i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert? ❑Yes ENo
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert: N/A
(iii) Width of existing culvert: N/A
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL: N/A
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain) N/A
h. Width of proposed bridge: 30 ft
j. - Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by reducing or
increasing the existing navigable opening? []Yes ENo
Ifyes,explain: N/A
I. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard concerning their
approval? ❑Yes ENo
If yes, explain: N/A
n. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands: N/A
2. CULVERTS E This section not applicable
a. Number of culverts proposed: N/A . b. Water body in which the culvert is to be placed:
RECEIVED N/A
FEB 1910?9
god MHI) (;ITY
252 803 2808 w.nccoastalmanageme nt.net revised: 10 26 06

Form DCM MP-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 2 of 4)
< Form continues on back>
c. Type of culvert (construction material):
N/A
d. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
❑Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge: N/A
(iii) Width of existing bridge: N/A
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge: N/A
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain) N/A
f. Length of proposed culvert: N/A
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the NHW or NWL.
N/A
j. Will the proposed culvert affect navigation by reducing or
increasing the existing navigable opening? [--]Yes ❑No
If yes, explain: N/A
e. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
❑Yes []No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert(s): N/A
(iii) Width of existing culvert(s): N/A
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL: N/A
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain) N/A
g. Width of proposed culvert: N/A
i. Depth of culvert to be buried below existing bottom contour.
N/A
k. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
❑Yes []No
If yes, explain: N/A
3. EXCAVATION and FILL ❑This section not applicable
a. (1) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation below the NHW or NWL? []Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated: N/A
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated: N/A
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated: N/A
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards: N/A
c. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
high -ground excavation? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated: 35 ft
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated: 55 ft
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated: 3 ft
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards: 200 cy
b. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
❑CW _ ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL 30 sf ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
Excavation in 404 wetlands are due to grading under
south end of bridge (14 sf), ditch excavation (14 sf),
and excavation for waterline bore pit (2 sy).
RECEIVED
FEB 19 2020
DCM-MHD CITY
252-808-2808 :: 1.888-4RCOAST :: wwsv.nccoastalmanagr-ment.net revised: 102606

Forth iDCM MP-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 3 of 4)
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any excavation, please complete the following:
(i) Location of the spoil disposal area: TBD
e.
(ii) Dimensions of the spoil disposal area: TBD
(iii) Do you claim title to the disposal area? ®Yes ❑No (if no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.)
(iv) Will the disposal area be available for future maintenance? []Yes ®No
(v) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAVs), other wetlands (WL), or shell
bottom (SB)?
❑CW ❑SAV ❑WL ❑SS ❑None
If any boxes are checked, give dimensions if different from (ii) above. N/A
(vi) Does the disposal area include any area below the NHW or NWL? ? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (ii) above. N/A
(i) Mill the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed below NHW or NWL? []Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled: N/A
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled: N/A
(iv) Purpose of fill: N/A
g. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item of above) to
be placed on high -ground? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled: 455
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled: 45
(iv) Purpose of fill: Fill due to raised proposed grade and
shoulder widening.
I. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV []SB
OWL 53 at ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
Fill in 404 wetlands due to raised proposed grade and
shoulder widening.
a. Will the proposed project require the relocation of any existing b. Will the proposed project require the construction of any temporary
utility lines? ®Yes ❑No detour structures? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain: The project includes the reloaction of an If yes, explain: N/A
8" waterline, relocation of underground telephone lines,
and relocation of overhead powerlines and poles.
RECEIVED
If this portion of the proposed project has already received
approval from local authorities, please attach a copy of the
approval or certification. FEB 19 2020
< Form continues on backs DCM-MHD CITY
252-808-2808 .: 1-888-4RCOAST r w'rvw.nccoastalmanayement.ne,

Form, DCM MP-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 4 of 4)
c. Will the proposed project require any work channels? d. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion
[--]Yes ®No controlled?
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2. Project will utilize standard NCDOT sediment and erosion
control practices.
e. What type of construction equipment will be used (for example,
dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
Cranes, excavatiors, dump trucks, and paving equipment.
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
shoreline stabilization? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, complete form MP-2, Section 3 for Shoreline
Stabilization only.
Z-IZ-Zo
Date
17BP.2.R.95 Bridge Replacement SR 1971 over Branch of
Durham Creek
Project Name [/
Applic%antt Name L/ r/
/✓�7 if /�L�"---
Applicant §ignature
f. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project site?
❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
N/A
RECEIVED
FEB 19, Z2
DCM-MHD CITY
232-808-2808 888-4RCOAS'r :: www.ncwasta;management.net revised: 10 26 06

State Project 17BP.2.R.95
February 12, 2020
3.0 Agent Authorization Form
CAMA General Permit Application
RECEIVED
FEB 19 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks to Be Filled in By the Current Landowner or Municipal Official
Name: NCDOT - Division 2 Michael Aman, PE, Division Bridge Program Manager
Address: 1037 W.H. Smith Blvd., Greenville, NC 27834
Phone: [phone]
Project Name/Description: State Proiect 17BP 2 R 95 - Replace Bridge # 14 on SR 1971 (Durham Creek
Rd.) over Branch of Durham Creek, Beaufort County
Date: 12/16/2019
N.C. Division of Costal Management
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
Attn: Stephen Lane
Re: CAMA Permitting Consultation
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the current landowner or municipal official, hereby designate and authorize TGS Engineers to act in my
behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental
information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
Notice: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for
government officials to enter the property when accompanied by TGS staff. You should call TGS
to arr�angeasite meeting prior to visiting the site.
BY:A�
/r! dyal Aah BY: -OL- —
Print Name of Applicant Signature of Applicant
RECEIVED
FEB 19 2020
DCM-MHD CITE'

State Project 1713P.2.R.95
February 12, 2020
CAMA General Permit Application
4.0 Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification and Tar -Pamlico Buffer Authorization Letter
RECEIVED
FEB 19 ::.
DCM-MHD CITY

DocuSign Envelope ID: 48C88AE2-9345-441B-8BA5-886D93C28CC6
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
December 17, 2019
Beaufort County
NCDWR Project No. 20191453
Bridge No. 14
APPROVAL of 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION and TAR-PAMLICO BUFFER RECEIVED
AUTHORIZATION with ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Mr. Michael Aman
NCDOT, Division 2 FEB 19 2020
1037 W.H. Smith Blvd.
Greenville, NC 27835 DCM-MHD CITY
Dear Mr. Aman:
You have our approval, in accordance with the conditions listed below, for the following impacts for the purpose of
replacing Bridge Number 14 over an unnamed tributary to Durham Creek on SR 1971 (Durham Creek Rd) in
Beaufort County:
Wetland and Huffer imnncts in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin
Wetland
Hand
Buffer Zone
Buffer Zone
Site
Wetland Fill
Excavation
Clearing
1 (sq ft)
2 (sq ft)
(ac)
lac)
Inc)
Bride 14
<0.01
<0.01
0.08
2305
1305
Total
0.08
3,610
The project shall be constructed in accordance with your application dated received October 24, 2019 and additional
information received December 17, 2019. After reviewing your application, we have decided that these impacts are
covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 4132. This certification corresponds to the Nationwide
Permit 3 issued by the Corps of Engineers. This approval is also valid for the Tar -Pamlico Riparian Buffer Rules
(15A NCAC 2B.0259). In addition, you should acquire any other federal, state or local permits before you proceed
with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non -Discharge and Water Supply
Watershed regulations. This approval will expire with the accompanying 404 permit.
This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design described in your application (unless modified below).
Should your project change, you must notify the NCDWR and submit a new application. If the property is sold, the
new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter,and is thereby responsible for complying
with all the conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, or of total
impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 300 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as
described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). Additional buffer impacts may require compensatory mitigation
as described in 15A NCAC 2B.0259. For this approval to remain valid, you must adhere to the conditions listed in
the attached certification(s) and any additional conditions listed below.
Condition(s) of Certification:
I. The issuance of this certification does not exempt the Permittee from complying with any and all statutes, rules,
regulations, or ordinances that may be imposed by other government agencies (i.e. local, state, and federal) having
jurisdiction, including but not limited to applicable buffer rules, stormwater management rules, soil erosion and
sedimentation control requirements, etc.
2. The Permittee shall ensure that the final design drawings adhere to the permit and to the permit drawings submitted
for approval. [ 15A NCAC 02H .0507(c) and 15A NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(2) and (c)(2)j
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 1 1611 Mall Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1611
rGaTM vrrAeuiaAN o-...w awry 919.707.9000

DocuSign Envelope ID: 48C88AE2-9345441 B-8BA5-886093C28CC6
3. The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary located within the construction corridor approved by this
authorization shall be clearly marked by highly visible fencing prior to any land disturbing activities. Impacts to
areas within the fencing are prohibited unless otherwise authorized by this certification. [15A NCAC 02H.0501
and .0502]
4. During the construction of the project, no staging of equipment of any kind is permitted in waters of the U.S.,
or protected riparian buffers. [I 5A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(2)]
5. All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters must be regularly inspected and maintained to prevent
contamination of stream waters from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials. [15A NCAC
02H.0506(b)(3)]
6. No rock, sand or other materials shall be dredged from the stream channel except where authorized by this
certification. [15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3)]
7. All fill slopes located in jurisdictional wetlands shall be placed at slopes no flatter than 3:1, unless otherwise
authorized by this certification. [15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(2)]
8. When applicable, all construction activities shall be performed and maintained in full compliance with G.S.
Chapter 113A Article 4 (Sediment and Pollution Control Act of 1973). Regardless of applicability of the
Sediment and Pollution Control Act, all projects shall incorporate appropriate Best Management Practices for
the control of sediment and erosion so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules
occur. [15A NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(3) and (c)(3) and 15A NCAC 0213.0200]
a. Design, installation, operation, and maintenance of all sediment and erosion control measures shall be
equal to or exceed the requirements specified in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment
and Erosion Control Manual, or for linear transportation projects, the NCDOT Sediment and Erosion
Control Manual.
b. All devices shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) sites,
including contractor -owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project. Sufficient materials
required for stabilization and/or repair of erosion control measures and stormwater routing and
treatment shall be on site at all times.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures shall be designed, installed, operated,
and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Surface Mining
Manual. Reclamation measures and implementation shall comply with the reclamation in accordance
with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act and the Mining Act of 1971.
d. If the project occurs in waters or watersheds classified as Primary Nursery Areas (PNAs), SA, WS-1,
WS-1 I, High Quality Waters (HQW), or Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), then the sedimentation
and erosion control designs shall comply with the requirements set forth in 15A NCAC 04B .0124,
Design Standards in Sensitive Watershed. [15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3) and (c)(3); GC 4135]
9. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or surface waters or within 5 feet of the
top of bank without prior approval from DWR. [15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3) and (c)(3)]
10. Erosion control matting in riparian areas shall not contain a plastic or nylon mesh grid which can impinge and
entrap small animals. Matting should be secured in place by staples, stakes, or wherever possible live stakes of
native trees. Riparian areas are defined as a distance 25 feet from top of stream bank. [ 15A NCAC 02B.0201 ]
11. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, then design and
placement of temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a manner that may result in dis-
equilibrium of wetlands, stream beds, or banks, adjacent to or upstream and downstream of the above
structures. All sediment and erosion control devices shall be removed from wetlands and waters and the
natural grade restored within two (2) months of the date that the Division of Energy, Mining and Land
Resources (DEMLR) or locally delegated program has released the specific area within the project. [15A
NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3) and (c)(3)]
12. As a condition of this 401 Water Quality Certification, the bridge demolition and construction must be
accomplished in strict compliance with the most recent version of NCDOT's Best Management Practices forRECEIVED
Construction and Maintenance Activities. [ 15A NCAC 02H .0507(d)(2) and 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(5)]
FEB 19 ZOZO
DCM-MHD CITY

DocuSign Envelope ID: 48C88AE2-9345-441B-8BA5-886D93C28CC6
13. Bridge deck drains shall not discharge directly into the stream to the maximum extent practicable. Stormwater
shall be directed across the bridge and pre-treated through site -appropriate means (grassed swales, pre -formed
scour holes, vegetated buffers, etc.) where possible before entering the stream. To meet the requirements of
NCDOT's NPDES permit NCS0000250, please refer to the most recent version of the North Carolina
Department of Transportation Stornwater Best Management Practices Toolbox manual for approved measures.
[15A NCAC 02H .0507(d)(2) and 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(5)]
14. All bridge construction shall be performed from the existing bridge, temporary work bridges, temporary
causeways, or floating or sunken barges. If work conditions require barges, they shall be floated into
position and then sunk. The barges shall not be sunk and then dragged into position. Under no
circumstances should barges be dragged along the bottom of the surface water. [15A NCAC
02H .0506(b)(3)]
15. Bridge piles and bents shall be constructed using driven piles (hammer or vibratory) or drilled shaft
construction methods. More specifically, jetting or other methods of pile driving are prohibited without prior
written approval from the NCDWR first. [15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(2)]
16. The use of rip -rap above the Normal High Water Mark shall be minimized. Any rip -rap placed for stream
stabilization shall be placed in stream channels in such a manner that it does not impede aquatic life
passage. [15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(2)]
17. No drill slurry or water that has been in contact with uncured concrete shall be allowed to enter surface waters.
This water shall be captured, treated, and disposed of properly. [ 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(3)
18. A turbidity curtain will be installed in the stream if driving or drilling activities occur within the stream
channel, on the stream bank, or within 5 feet of the top of bank, or during the removal of bents from an old
bridge. This condition can be waived with prior approval from the NCDWR. [I5A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(3)
19. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 2B.0259(6), sediment and erosion control devices shall not be placed in Zone I of any
Tar -Pamlico Buffer without prior approval by the NCDWR. At this time, the NCDWR has approved no
sediment and erosion control devices in Zone 1, outside of the approved project impacts, anywhere on this
project. Moreover, sediment and erosion control devices shall be allowed in Zone 2 of the buffers provided
that Zone I is not compromised and that discharge is released as diffuse flow.
20. All riparian buffers impacted by the placement of temporary fill or clearing activities shall be restored to the
preconstruction contours and revegetated. Maintained buffers shall be permanently revegetated with non -
woody species by the end of the growing season following completion of construction. For the purpose of this
condition, maintained buffer areas are defined as areas within the transportation corridor that will be subject to
regular NCDOT maintenance activities including mowing. The area with non -maintained buffers shall be
permanently revegetated with native woody species before the next growing season following completion of
construction. (I5A NCAC 213.0259)
21. All stormwater runoff shall be directed as sheetflow through stream buffers at non -erosive velocities, unless
otherwise approved by this certification. (15A NCAC 213.0259)
22. New roadside ditches that do not control for nitrogen and attenuate flow before discharging through the riparian
buffer are prohibited [I5A NCAC 2B.0259(6)]
23, NCDOT shall be in compliance with the NCS00250 issued to the NCDOT, including the applicable requirements
of the NCG01000.
24. Native riparian vegetation must be reestablished in the riparian areas within the construction limits of the project
by the end of the growing season following completion of construction. [15A NCAC 02B.0506(b)(2)]
25. Discharging hydroseed mixtures and washing out hydroseeders and other equipment in or adjacent to surface waters
is prohibited. [I5A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3)] RECEIVED
FEB 19 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

DocuSign Envelope ID: 48C88AE2-9345-441B-8BA5-886D93C28CC6
26. The permittee and its authorized agents shall conduct its activities in a manner consistent with State water quality
standards (including any requirements resulting from compliance with §303(d) of the Clean Water Act) and any
other appropriate requirements of State and Federal law. If the NCDWR determines that such standards or laws
are not being met (including the failure to sustain a designated or achieved use) or that State or federal law is being
violated, or that further conditions are necessary to assure compliance, the NCDWR may reevaluate and modify
this certification. [ 15A NCAC 02B.0200]
27. The Permittee shall report any violations of this certification to the Division of Water Resources within 24 hours
of discovery. [15A NCAC 02B.0506(b)(2)]
28, The NCDOT will conduct a pre -construction meeting with all appropriate staff to ensure that the project supervisor
and essential staff understand the permit conditions and any potential issues at the permitted site. NCDWR staff
shall be invited to the pre -construction meeting. [15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(2) and (b)(3)
29. Upon completion of the project (including any impacts at associated borrow or waste sites), the NCDOT Division
Engineer shall complete the "Certification of Completion Form" to notify the NCDWR when all work included in
the 401 Certification has been completed. [I 5A NCAC 02H.0502(f)]
30. A copy of this Water Quality Certification shall be maintained on the construction site at all times. In addition, the
Water Quality Certification and all subsequent modifications, ifany, shall be maintained with the Division Engineer
and the on -site project manager. [ 15A NCAC 02H .0507(c) and 15A NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(2) and (c)(2)]
If you wish to contest any statement in the attached Certification you must file a petition for an administrative
hearing. You may obtain the petition form from the office of Administrative hearings. You must file the petition
with the office of Administrative Hearings within sixty (60) days of receipt of this notice. A petition is considered
filed when it is received in the office of Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The Office of
Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00am and 5:00pm, except
for official state holidays. The original and one (1) copy of the petition must be filed with the Office of
Administrative Hearings.
The petition may be faxed -provided the original and one copy of the document is received by the Office of
Administrative Hearings within five (5) business days following the faxed transmission.
The mailing address for the Office of Administrative Hearings is:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
Telephone: [phone], Facsimile: [phone]
A copy of the petition must also be served on DEQ as follows:
Mr. Bill F. Lane, General Counsel
Department of Environmental Quality
1601 Mail Service Center
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Resources under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you
have any questions, please contact Garcy Ward at (252)946-648lor [e-mail].
SDocuelgnl[Rby:
�a t pper Director
Division of Water Resources
Electronic copy only distribution:
Tom Steffens, US Army Corps of Engineers, Washington Field Office
Stephen Lane, NC Division of Coastal Management, Morehead City
Cathy Brittingham, NC Division of Coastal Management, Raleigh
Jay Johnson, NCDOT, Division 2 RECEIVED
Garcy Ward, NC Division of Water Resources Washington Regional Office
FEB 19 &P0
DCM-MHD CITY

State Project 1713P.2.11.95
February 12, 2020
CAMA General Permit Application
5.0 CAMA Landowner Letter, Signed Adjacent Riparian Landowner Statement Forms, & Notification
Receipts
RECEIVED
FEB 19 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

IGS
ENGINEERS
U)
ro
cc
GO
r`
r\
m
m
r`
W
00
W
m
n
m
m
w
0
a
Y
(n
L
D7
D
0
`o
N0
0
of
Co
0
r`
`m
(D
c
rn
C
W
U)
December 16, 2019
Dear Landowner,
The North Carolina Department of Transportation is planning to replace bridge no. 14 on SR
1971 (Durham Creek Rd) over Branch of Durham Creek. The proposed project will replace the
aging existing structure over Branch of Durham Creek. TGS Engineers has been contracted by
NCDOT for the design and permitting of this bridge replacement project.
This project crosses an Area of Environmental Concern, as defined by the North Carolina
Division of Costal Management (DCM), and must be approved by the DCM under provisions of
the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA). One of the prerequisites to this approval is that
adjacent riparian landowners be given an opportunity to comment on the proposal.
The attached from is submitted to ensure that you have an opportunity to comment on the
proposal. If you have no objections to the proposal, please return the form with your response
within ten (10) days to this office. If you do have objections to the project, please forward your
comments to:
Mr. Stephen Lane
N.C. Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave.
Morehead City, NC 28557
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
Ben Henegar, PE
Hydraulic Design Engineer
TGS Engineers
cc: Stephen Lane, NCDCM
RECEIVED
FEB 19.201,1
DCM-MHD CITY

ADJACENT RIPARIAN LANDOWNER STATEMENT
(Beaufort County: Replace Bridge No. 14 over Branch of Durham Creek)
NCDOT State Project 17BP.2.R.95
General Statutes and Division of Coastal Management General Permit approval procedures require
that riparian landowners with property adjoining a proposed development in an Area of
Environmental Concern (AEC) be given ten (10) days in which to comment on the proposed
development. This form allows the adjacent riparian landowner to express either: (1) that he/she
objects to the project; or, (2) that he/she does not object and desires to waive his/her right to the 10-
day period so that the processing of the application can progress more rapidly. Of course, the
adjacent riparian landowner ,teed not sign this form at all if he/site so chooses, however no response shall
be interpreted as no objection.
1, � - Z am an adjacent riparian property owner and am aware of the
North Carolina epartment of Transportation's plans to replace bridge 14 over Branch of Durham Creek
in Beaufort County, North Carolina. I am further aware that this work will occur in one or more
Areas of Environmental Concern and therefore will require authorization from the Division of
Coastal Management in accordance with the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
have no objection to the project as presently proposed and hereby waive that right of
objection as provided in General Statute 1 13-229.
I have objections to the project as presently proposed and my comments are attached.
'< /z/1Z'// 1
Signature of Adjace rt Riparian Landowner Date
61 ( y q-04 t 2 7 S
Phone Number with Area Code
FEB 19 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

ADJACENT RIPARIAN LANDOWNER STATEMENT
(Beaufort County: Replace Bridge No. 14 over Branch of Durham Creek)
NCDOT State Project 17BP.2.R.95
General Statutes and Division of Coastal Management General Permit approval procedures require
that riparian landowners with property adjoining a proposed development in an Area of
Environmental Concern (AEC) be given ten (10) days in which to comment on the proposed
development. This farm allows the adjacent riparian landowner to express either: (1) that he/she
objects to the project; or, (2) that he/she does not object and desires to waive his/her right to the 10-
day period so that the processing of the application can progress more rapidly. Of course, the
adjacent riparian landowner need not sign this form at all if he/she so chooses, however no response shall
be interpreted as no objection.
611-13t--YET M. CVE7'T, 52
1, Q L M A 5. L V L T i am an adjacent riparian property owner and am aware of the
North Carolina Department of Transportation's plans to replace bridge 14 over Branch of Durham Creek
in Beaufort County, North Carolina. I am further aware that this work will occur in one or more
Areas of Environmental Concern and therefore will require authorization from the Division of
Coastal Management irr accordance with the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
I have no objection to the project as presently proposed and hereby waive that right of
objection as provided in General Statute 1 13-229.
1 have objections to the project as presently proposed and my comments are attached.
l3/ Z) -U
Signature of Adjacent Riparian Landowner �� Date
<25a — y'=f 3-- t S y=z
Phone Number with Area Code
RECEIVED
FEB 19 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

�'
L I N
O
1 1p
�
I O^
O I
II 11 u
II II II
I I
r �
�
f9 I (Q 1
I I
1 N ih I
1
II it 11
1 I
I 1
I
I I
41W-Ia70prP ii II
i i �
�� ^�N _� Y
IfJ i i
i i
Y N[
II HO1�010
�w YID �'�
O IL i 1
1 i
II n
1 Y I
p W N 01
M QN
.—pp Yf` O 1
1
LY 0
ID N>-r it II
iI ZZUIn^O
r L
Ih O >..+
O 04 pp
f om NO NfV
C'� QN 1 1
1
N N
II II
nOF-12MONu II
I 1 ( w j
i I
L� ypOj i
i
3 Nc
wd' .lp OJn a II
'y
1
0 N
O® N
^
• UOW ti 11 ii
J
i r N N.-.
W E C2�0~
pmp'�
Y 31() OiQNy.�0 -O
�O Qp
WO �
EQUUOY
p.-Z •.
L Ip -pi aUl-ON
mmQY
YO I�p4 i 1
LO QYON N'p I
i
YYf
��
ONo Y CJ Y
U NK V'N mN�pYZYI
'UU W
1
N W- U> Y I i
UN
1 1
1 I
IpQdy
L Llf 4
li ii li
p�
N>mr EL -GM N Oa XN>pNroW201 N"O
WQ'Q NI
I
U UW�Ca.J3W v- n G d4 U�032W
fA ON10 ��{O{''��d.X-i
X...
CO1
l.�v X.�
�a
II II
ly J
ry W 100
N N vim- i Y 1
N C 1
I
YN
X O M1
UNU i
FOv�
0.lLi
u-
,M
yaw
LIO
0 ❑
In
i
99ET 560h TODO 0922 6TGO
Ili d i�i
s
09ET 560h TOOO 0922 6TOz
RECFIVED
FEB 19 '%
DCM-MHD CITY

State Project 17BP.2.R.95
February 12, 2020
CAMA General Permit Application
6.0 P-15heet (wetland & buffer impacts with erosion control measures shown)
RECEIVED
FEB 19 2020
DCM-MHD CITY

D
/• i
N
a ��
S
Ii
N
O
3 L� a
c
p
O
T m C
E
a
Z
C p�
T d
H
O O
rn m 3 `c
>
d
O v m
Z ry
W
E
A
E
pE
U
m
L (0
>
m
dN-
W
c
rn
m>nom
a
•v
c
mo
m_
d
m
d
m
>
W
T
m
d
J a
w
y
v
a
m
c'm
m
T
>
�
L
o
W
D
a
D
L
a
a
m
w
cNi w m H-,
Z
12
.@
ac
ry
C
F
E o 8 5
m n S O
m
9
°
Z
`m
'w
'm
Z
C �
a
Jn m 3v
❑ d do5o
q
y
d
Od
i°Zud
�'
-
0.
w F
oq
U
U
,O `. a p
p
c
C
o aw
0.0
«< m
m
O
U
U
U
K
>on ud
y 3Za
E
-
`u
B. t o
.o
c
z
Z
�5
�i
c
E Qi-..
u
mg
mna
m
e
o--
a rco_.
v
o
>Y
L5 w
d d m o
y
o
>'I
T Q O
J
m
'O
U 3 C L
m n
«
C
O
O
4
LL
d
a
O m
N
J
O Ott
U
d
m
J
m
L T m 6F
E
m
y
L
❑
U
d
m
U
at
L o
h
p
o >5'n
q
9
en
O
Z
a
E
p
t
1 � Ko .Ojl DW
m
N
m
U
N
E
E-
J
Q
m
UdM
K m _ L O
z
a
c
N
a'i
N .N m E o
E
E-
c
c
a
m
ow a 2w
v
5
C
p Y F O$
❑
m
L
m o 2
O
d
3
0
O
d
c
z d L_ m O
m
O
U
v n
m
o
u
E
10
>
3 E c
m E ..
c 5 iu
m
d
d
o
>
o
i0
u
n
S
N
o
.o
0
0
1p
N
N
o
0
O
a
p
o
Y
o d o m
z
Z
z
U
O
m
m
m Z
C
F
>
LL
C C O d O'
T
Z
ami
a
Z ti
N
v
o.
`E
dU6
m
o
0
2
a
ry
w
>
m
cm
o
w$
m Z E.0
Z
m
�.
a
r
LL
m
L
c
r d
p
O
no DtL_
m
N
O
d
m£
3
A
ry
m
w
G
c
O
3
o
�
.E
E
N
E
C
p
t6
:3 u
c
4.2
cG
m
r
E
me � O
a
?�
N
d
m
m
a
N
�
L>
rcE
c9
m
m
p&`ou
O
c';rnoon
=
m
m
U
3
m
j
mU
Q
a'yE U m
°
3
a
y
E
om
wo
om
t
c
q
},m
dl
U
A.'cg
J
ui tll
d O
m
Ti
-
'E
um
N
P:
p
y
o
Y
3z
iSrc3
a
S_Qzap
a�
6c7
..d
w
z

/
/
~
!!¥,
®
.2!
& /
;!_
)
-
E.)
,
�0,
t
kk20
E—E=,
M
7
`
)
03
&
!o
!
E
m
00
)\\
�} z�
\
�
ZZ
�
0

State Project 17BP.2.R.95 LAMA General Permit Application
February 12, 2020
8.0 NCDOT Historic Architecture and Landscapes No Survey Form
RECEIVED
FEB 19 2020
10
DCM-MHCD CITY

Project Tracking No. (Internal Use)
15-02-0006
Gw�'t HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
t, NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
r is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
PUn IUCT iNIMUMATION
Project No:
B-4709
Coun
Beaufort
WBS No.:
38484.1.2
Document
Type:
PCE or CE
Fed/ Aid No:
BRZ-1932(4)
Funding:
State Federal
Federal
Permits :
Yes No
Permit
I T e(s):
Project Description: Replacement of Bridge No. 14 on SR 1932 (Durham Creek Rd) over
Branch of Durham Creek.
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
Description of review activities results. and conclusions:
Review of HPO quad maps, HPO GIS information, historic designations roster, and indexes was
undertaken on February 5, 2015. Based on this review, there are no existing NR, SL, LD, DE, or SS
properties in the Area of Potential Effects, which is approximately 1200' from the north end of the bridge
and 800' from the south end of the bridge, and 100' from the centerline each way. There are no structures
within the APE based on aerial imagery. Bridge No. 14, built in 1966, is not eligible for National Register
listing. There are no National Register listed or eligible properties, and no survey is required. If design
tans change, additional review will be required.
Why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting that there
are no unidentirled siantrcant historic architectural or landscape resources to the protect
area:
HPO quad maps and GIS information recording NR, SL, LD, DE, and SS properties for the Beaufort
County survey and Google Maps are considered valid for the purposes of determining the likelihood of
historic resources being present. There are no National Register listed or eligible properties within the
APE and no survey is required.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
4Map(s) ❑Previous Survey Info. ❑Photos ❑Correspondence
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
Historic Architecture and Landscapes -- NO SURVEY REQUIRED
❑Design Plans
RECEIVED
FEB 19 2020
HD CITY
NCDOT Architectural Historian Date
Hi.00ric Architecture and l andscopes NO SURVEY REQUIRED fol'rn for Minor 7Yoaspormlion Projects as Qoalifred in the 1007 Progranunalic Agrcerrrenr.
Page 1 of 2

n
J;
9
f�
t,
,r

GmOAK pp
Legend yR0 ( / O�ONN WHITEHUR/
111 Studied Detour Route
Q /
� O
44, \ ^off a�-
%�
1 �
SR'1104
1 f
B-4709
��•• o
• 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 /.. _ �R-1955 �QAC
•
Approx. Detour Length= 11.7 mi •, �a
x
co
j • ♦ m
0 0.5 1 2
Miles
�'"Y ST
y. ESRI Word Street Basemap
.✓' t I is
A'
f.T � H V
f ]61 � , •n
URT
Y 'i ....luf[<R+
t
R A'Y ..'V N..,.N
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT VICINITY MAP
OF TRANSPORTATION Beaufort County, NC
x DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS Replace Bridge No. 14 on SR 19
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT & over Branch of Durham Creek
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH B-4709
Date: 1-8-2015
Ficttt[e 1 9 2 20
DCM-MHD CITY

State Project 1713P.2.11.95 CAMA General Permit Application
February 12, 2020
9.0 NCDOT No Archaeological Survey Required Form
RECEIVED
FEB 19 2020
11 DCM-MHD CITY

Project Tracking No.:
15-02-0006
,ofxtt NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not f?' '
v1 valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the k 0
it
e y(�k5-
11, 41. Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: B-4709 County: Beaufort
WBS No: 38484.1.2 Document: PCE or CE
F.A. No: BRZ-1932(4) Funding: ❑ State ® Federal
Federal Permit Required? ® Yes ❑ No Permit Type: NWP 3 or 14
Project Description:
The project calls for the replacement of Bridge No. 14 on SR 1932 (Durham Creek Road) over Tan
Swamp in Beaufort County. The archaeological Area of Potential Effects (APE) for the project is defined
as a 1,200 foot (365.76 m) long corridor running 600 feet (182.88 m) north and 600 feet south along
Durham Creek Road from the center of Bridge No. 14. The corridor is approximately 200 feet (60.96 m)
wide extending 100 feet (30.48 m) on either side of the road from its present center.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
Bridge No. 14 is located between the Pamlico River to the north and the community of Edward to the
south in the southern portion of Beaufort County, North Carolina. The project area is plotted in the
northwestern corner of the Aurora USGS 7.5' topographic quadrangle (Figure 1).
A map review and site file search was conducted at the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) on February
9, 2015. No previously recorded archaeological sites have been identified within the APE, but two sites
(31 BF171 and 31 BF178) are reported within a mile of the bridge. According to the North Carolina State
Historic Preservation Office online data base (HPOWEB 2014), there are no known historic architectural
resources within the APE that may yield intact archaeological deposits. Topographic maps, USDA soil
survey maps, aerial photographs (NC One Map), and historic maps (North Carolina maps website) were
examined for information on environmental and cultural variables that may have contributed to
prehistoric or historic settlement within the project limits and to assess the level of ground disturbance.
Bridge No. 14 and Durham Creek Road cross Tan Swamp roughly north to south (Figure 2). The swamp
drains to the east and is a tributary to Durham Creek. These waterways are part of the Tar -Pamlico
drainage basin. The APE is situated along the Tan Swamp floodplain with moderately steep side slopes
at either end. The area is mostly forested with secondary growth. Although ground disturbance appears
minimal, there are reports of a heavy disturbance from former occupation in the southeast quadrant.
According to the USDA soil survey map, the APE encompasses only two soil types (Figure 3). The
floodplain is made up of Dorovan mucky peat (Do). This series is very poorly drained, nearly level, and
waterlogged. Persistent wetness and flooding make this series undesirable for settlement activitie&E1VED
subsurface testing is required for this series. The side slopes are composed of Winton fine sandy oam
(WeD). This series is moderately well drained with a slope of 12 to 25 percent. Typically, slope of 15
percent or more is not tested since it is unlikely to yield significant archaeological deposits. FEB 19, 202O
"NoAR('HAEOLOGYSURrl'r1?LQ(,1]!R7) f... fin AhnorhansportationProjectsasQuahfied In die 200' he Agreemem.
t of DCM-MHD CITY

Project Tracking No.:
15-02-0006
A review of the site files show that few investigations have been carried out within the area with most to
the east of Durham Creek. The two previously known archaeological sites (31 BF 171 and 31 BF 178)
reported within a mile of the bridge are 20th century African -American cemeteries. They were recorded
in 1989 by East Carolina University during the Texas -Gulf Survey. The National Register's eligibility for
these two sites has yet to be assessed. Although no surveys have been conducted in the project area, it
was reviewed by OSA (ER 09-2687) in 2009 (Attachment 1). This review was for construction of a
docking facility. Due to reported ground disturbance and unlikeliness of encountering a significant site,
an archaeological survey was not recommended.
A historic map review was also conducted. Most early maps from the 18th and 19th centuries provide
only general details concerning the region illustrating just major roads, settlements, and drainages such as
John Lawson's 1709 map of North Carolina, which identifies Durham Creek but little else within the
vicinity (Figure 3). However, the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey of 1874 produced a highly detail map
of the Pamlico River and surrounding area (Figure 4). This map depicts a road/trail following the same
alignment as Durham Creek Road with a crossing over the swamp. No structures or farms are plotted in
the vicinity as the area is shown as forest. The 1908 Beaufort County Geological map and the later 1914
Post Office Map illustrate the same road with households along it, but all are well away from the project
area (Figure 5). By the 19030s, the bridge begins to appear on printed material such as on the 1938 North
Carolina State Highway map for Beaufort County (Figure 6). Subsequent 20th century maps provide no
further or useful information on development. This includes no structure in the area reviewed by OSA.
In general, the historic maps suggest that no former structures with new or important information were
once located within the APE, and no significant deposits should be encountered.
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE.
The defined archaeological APE for the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 14 is located along the Tan
Swamp floodplain and the neighboring side slopes. It is unlikely intact and significant archaeological
deposits will be present in this area. This is primarily due to persistently wet soils in the floodplain and
slope of 15 percent or more leading rip to the ridges. The historic maps also suggest no significant
archaeological deposits from former historic structures are within or near the project limits. Finally, OSA
has previously reviewed the current APE for another development project, and recommended no
archaeological survey. As long as impacts to the subsurface occur within the defined APE, no further
archaeological work is recommended for the replacement of Bridge No. 14 in Beaufort County. If
construction should affect subsurface areas beyond the defined APE, further archaeological consultation
might be necessary.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: ® Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info
❑ Photocopy of County Survey Notes
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
NO ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED
C. Damon Jones
NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST 11
❑ Photos ❑Correspondence
Other: Images from historic maps
02/19/15
Date
RECEIVED
FEB 19 C!A
" oARCHAhOUXGY'StIRVINRRQ!IROYfirm(urMinorbanp), woon ProjectsnsQualifiedin the 2007 I'mgrnrnrnane Agreemem.
2 of DCM-MIHD CITY

Project Tracking No.:
15-02-0006
T One Mile Radius (Shaded) - se ( 5
1
Around PrgectArea
ss
{1 I I NJY.
' �t Bridge
r. I
APE (Red)
\\\iii 1 II C r� I 'l•�s 1 \»� f A .. 1✓ l/
\
c
Bonnertmi
It 1 Qn,
{✓�la TI
ss� 7 J "Y,
^s
0 N
Miles
0 1,000 W-1; E
Beaufort County Meters 1S
Figure 1. Topographic Setting of the Project Area, Aurora (1950; revised 1993), Edward (195u;
photorevised 1983), Blounts Bay (1953; revised 1993), and Bath (1951; revised 1993), NC, USGS 7.5'
Topographic Quadrangle. RECEIVED
"NnA7!('HAL'OLOGy.ti(lRVBY IU:'Q!I/IU:'D"%ur hfmw Trnncpm1a11m1 Prgecd as Quallficd in the 2007 Progrmmnallc Agreement FEB Y °,ZOZO
3 of 8
DCM-MHD CITY

/jjl� ; ; t fi �__r �/�JJIj'�,r✓I�� it�1, I ♦tt\ i
1 ♦�♦♦ R `♦,.r.l l f i f •� I I I f ! t 1 R ....-\\ \ aW..rrr.'�.
t Jr`w `\ R♦ `♦w II 'f I f ! � 1 I j \ � � _r \ RRr_..r4 p
� RR♦ `♦♦ wR R♦.r✓ j � ! ; + ; � 1 � } � i R,r � 4-___ ....r,� .,,.--rrrY ..�
! �RRRwR+,♦ 4rr WfD-
-. -- --
~+--. rArr t♦ ♦,Rr,,r"♦ �j , flit
♦ _ \ ♦, 1 111Ap
I \ t �♦
,r - ``
r\\ ♦,\ ``♦ ♦♦r ! /=rr ' f 1 if ``' I + !f 1 I ,
,\\.... `' \,{♦,lRR��rw �.Jrr_ ±,`Jj J� .1 1. I r� w�+ t
Z.
- ttJ
R,r '� r ' I •. . I C7
me .,Y ♦ -.:, .,; r___�_-R�/ � � i� � � C-;! ♦' fr_- fir- 1.;:. �
I t
. V , -. rrr �rrw w, r +�,�-,r rR♦_ ♦♦� \ � r'Wr `w
r-R� \�♦�R,♦ ,I^R♦
\�'^ -„ra R,\\,R R Jar_ ♦
.tin ! ()jl ♦ i 1 r�' r ♦ \ ♦ ♦ �`\ ♦ r " h,
I F1 f ♦ Irw ♦ 4 t I f / r ♦ ♦ ♦♦ wR, R�~ - ,♦ ♦R
1 1 i t � + \ ♦` t ;.ioil ✓ ,✓rrrRr,`� ♦ \ w,, ,ww.hJrR ,1,1,.`1R R"♦ Rw� ♦` ♦
WfD. 1 IIr j ' j ♦ \ ♦R RR �R RR R\, wR '+ 1 ��
1 1� i t I l i ` �' ! `✓ I \ ♦ .,` w, w�. PY `\ R\ R � i \\
t 11�i11; r f \ :� +E�1, (.� , !,♦O RRR,wO `.`\ �` 0 Sb t
�I �l.l l ` r+; t � tli , +, RwRw.. R'yR♦ [p `� \ 1 f f `t
Contour at 2 fee
^`♦�, 1!� t 1t r,Jrr_ `o. w♦♦,�M+ w Z t4}, j
Soils wr`; `, rn/ 1 �,/. ✓rr rrr `♦ iA 11/ I

Project Tracking No.:
L,
Figure 3. John Lawson's 1709 map of North Carolina showing, the approximate location of the project
area.
Project Area
; r sd a •::.F ^
};t •. a
r
-. ley^i �'`�j, � t -.
r {�♦�a -
.. a ,9
�♦. .fig. a al�a
�
Y 1l. �M J, ♦i
-•N,. r 1. ay • `. a aa� s 1 .g a
-
k:�,
a/,♦
aa!
{_ S � Yea ♦� 1a I � i .�[I 4Y It. /
.r� ♦ a a f M1'aC
Y �:�. -
� • �4• ♦ as 4.' 1'�]� •a F'
f.
��� � a��a.+�1. R.♦Ia,_a ♦ Y�ry�.a 1. •..�. f_b171 `a _ 'a♦ *_.
°d.
Figure 4. The 1874 Pamlico River map by the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey showing the location of
the project area. RECE
iWtL-I/OLOGY St'RI'/;)'RLQU[I?I:TJ"fonnfm-b/inor Trarvcporlation Piojeat. mQualfedn, IN 2007 Progranunanc Ag, eemun. FEB 19 7vq
5 of
DCM-MHD CITY

Pmycc( Tracking .A'o.:
15-02-0006
Project Area
> ,ajlt Uadl
I3r�tttuYrtar� .
Ti
'f Y
i
Figure 5. The 1908 Beaufort County Geological map showing the location of the project area.
Figure 6. The 1914 Post Office map showing the location of the project area.
RECEIVED
Ao Akc M a17) R1,01 IRO) ,,;,, , ,r „r, P, ... t,,,<,f,,,d,» th, 200-M ,a,,,,,,.,FEB 19 '220
6of8
DOM-iV HU CITY

Projecl Tracking No.:
F15-02-0006
• . o
t & a
• •
04
•: • � o • R �� • r
• • >s
e
0
Project Area, •
Fieure 7. The 1938 North Carolina State Hiehwav mat) for Beaufort County showing the location of the
project area.
RECElvr7n
FEB 19 r
DCM-MHD UTY
"Ao.I N IL II OLOGY SURVRY RiQl'//?/ U"lurm fm 1Onnr l ianvpoileaton Projecls as Qunhfed 1n the 1007 Prngronrmalic Agreernan.
7of8

Project Tracking No.:
15-02-0006
Tracking N: ER 09.2687 Other N's
County: Beaufort
Applicant: Evett Properties, LLC Status:
Project: Construct 10 Slip Community Docking Facility,
Durham Creek Road & Stilley Town Road, Aurora
InitiallN: 11/2/2009 CurrentlN: 11/2/2009 Client: 10/30/2009 DUE: 11/9/2009 OUT:11/10/2009
Program: CAMA To: A/S
Info. Req.: By: Info Type: Received:
FLAGINFO Arcchaeoloey Survey/Rest.
Survey Req: By: Report: Report:
Testing Reg: By: Report: Report:
Mitigation: By: Report: Report.
Bib A'
Quads: Aurora
Notes: NC RWL, 11/6/09
VD Project Area Map
LJ Survey Area Map
❑ DoE
UNK F,ffect
Sites: 0 Forms IN:
Acres: 23 Miles:
E DoE NR Map Cleared Archaeology: 11/5/2009
❑Microfiched Cleared Survey: 11/10/2009
Reviewer(s): LEAMBC
Comments
Arch Comments: 11/03/09: Redd CAMA application for review. To LEA. LFF
11/5/09: Reviewed the project and chocked the quad map. No previously recorded sites noted within the
project area. The project is located on the west slope of the Suffolk Scarp. There are numerous sites in
the surrounding area associated with this ancient landform. All things being equal would recommend a
survey, but based on the project description provided by the DCM, it appears the upland area of the
project has already been subdivided Into seven lots. Within the permit area there is an existing septic
system and old camp with unpaved road access. Based on this information the project area appears to
be relatively disturbed. It is unlikely that a NRHP eligible site will be Impacted by the work proposed in
the application. An archaeological survey is not recommended. No Comment. LEA. Survey
Comments: 11-10-09 NC JBCHPO Comments:
Attachment 1. A copy of OSA assessment of the project area, ER 09-2687.
FEB 19 ZO7.O
'1VoAH('HAGOLO(iY.S(AtVEY2]+'QUIR6D"(or'mjorA(Ntor Trarrvpartallonl'rojeclsas Qmllfie(linlbeldq7Programmailc Agreet),D M-MHL) L1l P
8 of YYVV