Land Use Plan 1987-1987

TOWN OF
MINNESOTT
DCM
BEACH
DCM COPY
lease do not remove!!!!!
Division of Coastal Management
LAND USE
1987
PLAN

Town of Minnesott Beach
Otis Peele
Mayor
Land Use Plan
1987
Developed and Adopted by the Planning Board and
Town Council of the Town of Minnesott Beach
Locally Adopted on May 12, 1987
CRC Certified on June 5, 1987
John Anthes
Planning Board Chairman
prepared by:
Dick Brockett, Senior Planner
Rich Hall, Intern
Wanda Roberson, Typist
East Carolina University Regional Development Institute
Willis Building
Greenville, N.C.
The preparation of this report was financed in part through a grant provided by the North Carolina Coastal
Managment Program, through funds provided by the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended,
which is administered by the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.

wuw • *0n �Y7��YY.
PAGE NO.
PREFACE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
vii
EXECUTIVESLZ24ARY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
viii
SECTION ONE: CU4ENITY PROFILE AND DESCRIPTION. . . . . .
1
A. POPULATION AND SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1
1. General Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1
2. Permanent Population . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3
3. Seasonal Population . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7
B. PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7
1. General Description . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7
2. Soils and Slope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7
3. Vegetation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8
4. Mineral Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
8
C. OME NITY DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8
1. General Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8
2. Commercial Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9
3. Residential Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9
4. Tourism. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9
5. LoCal Employment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10
6. Existing Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11
7. Existing Land Use Compatibility. . . . . . . .
11
8. Changes in Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
13
9. Unplanned Develogrent Potential. . . . . . . . . .
13
10. Areas of Environmental Concern . . . . . . . . . .
14
i

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
PAGE NO.
D.
DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
16
E.
MAN-MADE HAZARDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
21
F.
ESTIMATED CITIZEN DEMAND/SATISFACTION. . . . . . . . .
21
SECTION TWO: PLANNING PROCESS . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
25
A.
PLAN FORMULATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
25
1. Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
25
2. Local Input . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
25
3. Issue Identification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
27
4. Intergovernmental Cooperation. . . . . . . . . . .
28
5. Current Plans, Management Tools, and Policies. . .
30
B.
EXISTING POLICIES REVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
30
SECTION THREE: POLICY FORMULATION . . . . . . . . . . . .
37
OVEEiVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
37
A.
NATURAL RESOURCE PROTECTION POLICIES . . . . . . . . .
37
1. Areas of Environmental Concern . . . . . . . . . .
37
2. Development in Areas with land Constraints (Hazards
or Fragile Characteristics) . . . . . . . . . .
42
3. Storm Hazard Mitigation, Post -Disaster Recovery and
Evacuation Plan Needs . . . . . . . . . . . . .
49
B.
RESOURCE PRTION AND MANAGEI�4EN3 qTT . . . . . . . . . .
49
1. Agriculture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
49
2. Ccnuercial Forestry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
49
3. Mining Resource Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
49
4. Commercial and Recreational Fisheries. . . . . . .
49
5. Off -Road Vehicles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
49
6. Residential and Commercial land Development. . . .
49
ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
PAGE NO.
C.
ECONOMIC AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. . . . . . . . . .
50
1. Desired Land Develogmnt/Redevelogmnt . . . . . .
50
2. Local Conmitmnt to Service Provisions . . . . . .
51
3. Beach and Waterfront Access. . . . . . . . . . . .
54
4. Floating Marina/Develogmnt Homes. . . . . . . . .
55
5. Coamitment to State and Federal Programs . . . . .
55
D.
CONTINUING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION. . . . . . . . . . . .
56
E.
STORM HAZARD MITIGATION, POST DISASTER RDOOVERy, AND
EVACUATION PLANS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
57
1. Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
57
2. Storm Hazard Mitigation Policies . . . . . . . . .
58
3. Hurricane Evacuation Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . .
59
CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
63
SECTION FOUR: LAND CLASSIFICATION SYSTM. . . . . . .
64
A.
OVERVIEW AND PURPOSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
64
B.
DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
64
C.
CATEGORIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
64
1. Developed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
64
2. Transition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
65
3. Cam dty. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
67
4. Rural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
67
5. Conservation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
69
D.
POLICIES RELATED TO LAND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS . . . .
69
1. Ccmmnity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
69
2. Transition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
70
iii

TABLE OF CONmm (continued)
PAGE NO.
3. Conservation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
4. Developed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
5. Rural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
SB=ION FIVE: POLICY SYNOPSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
A. OVERVIEI4 AND PURPOSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
B. LISTING AND ALTERNATIVES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
APPENDIX
iv

LISTING OF MAPS/GRAPHICS
nary nvi
MAP/GRAPHIC 1 - LOCATION MAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
MAP/GRAPHIC 2 - POPULATION PROJECTION . . . . . . . . . 5
MAP/GRAPHIC 3 - EXISTING LAND USE . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
MAP/GRAPHIC 4 - AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN. . . . . . 39
MAP/GRAPHIC 5 - HAZARDS/OONSTRAINTS . . . . . . . . . . . 44
MAP/GRAPHIC 6 - FLOOD HAZARD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
MAP/GRAPHIC 7 - LAND CLASSIFICATION . . . . . . . . . . . 71
MAP/GRAPHIC 7a - EXISTING ZONING. . . . . . . . . . 68
ki

LISTING OF EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT 1 - Population Projection . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
EXHIBIT 2 - Population Breakdown . . . . . . . . . . 6
EXHIBIT 3 - Water Connections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
EXHIBIT 4 - Residential Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
EXHIBIT S - Soil Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
EXHIBIT 6 - Crosstabulation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
EXHIBIT 7 - Planning Schedule. . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
EXHIBIT 8 - 1980 Local Policies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
vi

The following docLmient was developed pursuant to the format suggested
by the North Carolina Coastal Resources Commission. The data, background
information, and referenced documents were developed based upon the
guidelines spelled out in Subchapter 7B of the North Carolina Administra-
tive Code. other information used in the development of the plan was
generated during the planning process itself through personal interviews,
the community survey instrument, and the previous lairs use plan.
The final determinations of this plan were subject to close scrutiny
by the planners, local planning board, local officials, and interested
citizens. It represents the most logical and realistic approach to the
local issues, problems, and opportunities of the Town of Minnesott Beach.
It is felt the document provides a firm foundation for the pursuit
of environmental integrity and the realization of the best developed
comnmity possible.
vii

EXECUTIVE SUMARY
The Town of Minnesott Beach is continuing to maintain its character
as an attractive, retirement -oriented community on the banks of the Neuse
River. Though a relatively young municipality, the town has taken quick
steps to equip itself with land management tools that will ensure a certain
quality of development blended with environmental integrity.
During the past five years, the town has experienced moderate growth
with residential development —multi -family and single-family dwelling —
constituting the majority of the growth. The construction and expansion
of the local marina has been the only significant commercial development
over this period of time.
Minnesott Beach is unique in that the town has fewer, severe physical
constraints than the surrounding areas of Pamlico County. An appealing
location, higher elevation, and comparatively good soils all contribute
to this enviable situation. Though these attributes are welcomed, they
also necessitate that proper controls be in place to accommodate the
inevitable, continued development of properties.
The town continues to be faced with a small population base, a
small tax base, and a remote location. Each of these contribute to a
limited amount of urban services being offered by the municipality.
Beyond a centralized water system, garbage and trash collection, and road
maintenance, the town does not provide urban services. The town will
continue to work toward amenable solutions to correct these deficiencies
through cooperation with the County and nearby communities/service
districts. The town has sought within this plan to identify certain steps
viii

toward potential solutions which will gradually service local needs and
yet not be fiscally unfeasible for its limited resources.
on the other hand, the town will not relinguish its cam itment to
develop as a single-family residential community despite the obvious tax
revenue advantages that could be attained through other types of develop-
ment. The emphasis on quality, environmentally -sensitive development
will continue to be sought through the development and implementation of
available codes and ordinances.
The paoe of developnent during the next five years is expected to be
consistent with the past five years. Although same acceleration may take
place as inland shoreline areas became increasingly attractive to the
expanding number of retirement age citizens. Because of past and present
planning efforts, the small municipality of Minnesott Beach has the "basics"
to plan and protect its immediate future. Furthermore, the town has
demonstrated a willing attitude to take new actions during the planning
period to ensure its role as a responsible local government.

The 1986 Land Use Plan Update of the Town of Minnesott Beach was
a cooperative effort that enabled a workable, useful planning dommient
to be developed. The author would like to acknowledge the assistance
of the following citizens for their input, interest, and devotion of
time in this plan' s preparation.
Ottis Peele, Mayor, Town of Minnesott Beach
John Anthes, Chairman, Minnesott Beach Planning Board
Allen Shepard, member, Tbwn of Minnesott Beach
Zeb James, member, Town of Minnesott Beach
Thanas Kinney, member, Town of Minnesott Beach
Herbert Willis, member, Town of Minnesott Beach
Connie Kinney, Town Clerk, Town of Minnesott Beach

F'fay@ OA(r�

SECTION ONE: COMK7NITY PROFILE AND
A. POPULATION AND SETTING
1. General Description
Minnesott Beach is located in Pamlico County at the
southern -most point (see next page). The camunity is located along
the Neuse River as it flows toward the Pamlico Sound. The incorporation
of the town is relatively recent (1973) but has been the location for
seasonal hares, summer visitors, and recreational enjoyment for several
decades. The town consists of approximately 980 acres of land.
Today, the cannunity is becoming the hare of more permanent
residents and is the site of many speculative lots for second hares or
permanent residences. The development taking place has been primarily
limited to residential development or its associated recreational develop-
ment (i.e. Marina, Golf Case). Limited co mercial development has
occurred.
Highway access to the town is by N.C. Highway 306 only. A
state -maintained ferry provides access from southern Craven County and
Carteret County areas.
The town is atypical topographically for the coastal plain
of North Carolina. Due to its location along a high sandy bank which
is correctly identified as the Suffolk scarp the town does exhibit sore
topographical relief, especially along the creek tributaries feeding into
the Neuse River.
The town is bordered by a large YMCA camp (Camp Seagull)
to the east, the town of Arapahoe to the north, and the Neuse River on
the south. The western border is unincorporated Pamlico County.
1

Q
N

2. Permanent Population
The amount of permanent population residing in Minnesott
Beach has only been recorded once in the official federal census. Being
incorporated in 1973, previous counts included the entire enumeration
district (ED540U). The 1980 Census counted 171 persons as permanent
residents of Minnesott Beach. This figure contradicts the estimated
320 persons cited in the 1980 land use plan which was based upon the
following:
139 Occupied Units X 2.3 Average Household Size = 320 persons
Based upon the available survey information, the average
household size (permanent and seasonal) is 2.5 persons. It is generally
felt the permanent household size in Minnesott Beach is not that high and
the number of permanent residences is not as high as the previous consultants
had estimated. The citizen survey indicates permanent household size to
be close to 2.11.
Present housing surveys indicate a total of 106 permanent
housing units located within the town limits. Using the per household
figure calculated from the survey figures, a total of 224 permanent
residents are now estimated in the municipality. Using the previous factor
of 2.3 persons per household (1980 Land Use Plan), the figure is 244
persons. As one can see, such differences represent sizeable changes in
the population estimates from the 1980 Plan.
106 Permanent Housing Units X 2.11 1986 Survey = 224 persons
figure
106 Permanent Housing Units X 2.3 1980 Household = 244 persons
factor
11980 Minnesott Beach sand Use Plan, Coastal Consultants Ltd.
3

Both estimates are higher than the North Carolina Office
of State Budget and Management's 1984 estimate of 195 persons. Even
based upon those figures, Minnesott Beach has had the highest growth
rate of the County's municipalities (14.0%) (See Exhibit 1).
EXHIBIT 1:
POPULATION PRaJECTION
1970 Census
1980 Census 1984
Estimate
8 Change
PAMLICO CCxJM
9,467
10,398
10,859
4.4
Alliance
577
616
647
5.0
Arapahoe
212
467
476
1.9
Bayboro
665
759
771
1.6
Hollyville
100
102
2.0,
Mesic
369
390
400
2.6
Minnesott Beach 41
171
195
14.0
Oriental.
445
536
606
13.1
Stonewall
335
360
359
-0.3
Vandemere
379
335
333
-0.6
Source: N.C. Department of Administration.
Minnesott Beach has little in the way of historical census
data to base their projected population growth. Two projections (see
Map/Graphic 2 on page 5) are provided, one (Projection Line B) using the
two most recent census figures and one (Projection Line A) using the State
of North Carolina Office of Management and Budget's 1984 estimate. The latter
estimate is based upon four methods: constant proportion, partitioned change,
vital rates, and auto and truck registration. This percentage gain corres-
ponds directly with the increase in water customer tap-ons during the past
five years (See Exhibit 3).
The accuracy of Projection A is assumed to be more dependable
due to the abnormal influences placed upon Projection B. These influences,
such as the incorporation, installation of water service, and the opening
of the major subdivision that caTrises a majority of the town, represent
skewing effects. Based upon present information and the unknown influence
4

Tow--il of MIrJr�ESoTT �EeGFi
ropalailoo �ico1E�TIor�
1919
3?s
,
its
Ae
4a
------
Ito;
if
Ma,
is
P lativ►1
. YEAR 14170 1975 101900 l905
1. 147O cerrlsJs
2• IolIa e-00 -06
1- I q 34 ceN6v5 F6TIMAJ E
5
M7
1 ACW 1991;

of the popularity of water -related development, increased retiree
impact, and uncertain economic factors, an estimate between Projection
A and Projection B may be the most accurate for future planning purposes.
One fact that may be incorporated into this projection is that nearly
ore -third (32.2%) of the seasonal residents and/or property owners in
the citizen survey responses plan to permanently move to Minnesott Beach
within the next 5 years. This represents 20 new households (18.9% household
increase).
The composition of the permanent population is 52.6% Female
and 47.4% Male with nearly 95% of the residents being white. The median
age figure (40.7 years) reflects the retirement age of the comTunity. This
compares with 29.6 years and 32.3 for North Carolina and Pamlico County,
respectively. Nearly 12% of the permanent population is 65 years or above.
No detailed age breakdown for municipalities under 2,500 persons is
available.
EXHIBIT 2
1.0AINFAM• o•
Total Persons Male % Male
171 82 47.4
AGE GROUP
Under 5 years of age
18 years+
11/6.4$ 133/77.8_
w e
4 4M:
Female % Female
89 52.6
65 years+ Median aqe
19/11.7t 40.7 years
Year
Full-time
& Change Seasonal
% Change Total
1981
88
N/A 32
N/A 120
1986
106
+20.5 34*
+6.3 140
*Does
not include
seasonal trailers, mobile
hone spaces.
Source: Town of Minnesott Beach.
8 Change
N/A
+16.6
n

3. Seasonal Population
Twenty-four percent (24%) of the taan's population
consider themselves seasonal residents based upon water customer
registration (See Eyhibit 3). The survey results show approximately
14% of the household responses considered themselves seasonal residents
of Minnesott Beach. Such residents are primarily single family home-
owners that retain second hares in Minnesott Beach.
The current, available housing stock equals 182 units.
Using the overall per household figure of 2.5 generated by the citizen
survey, this represents a potential seasonal population of 455 persons.
Due to the lack of data for motel space, cottages, trailers, etc., this
estimate should be considered a mini ml figure. This projected seasonal
increase places the potential population of Minnesott Beach at
least 103% higher than the permanent population.
B. PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
1. General Description
The town of Minnesott Beach is mostly typical of the small
towns located in Pamlico County and along the coast of North Carolina.
The topography is relatively flat despite the presence of the afore-
mentioned scarp (ridge) that exists. The soils have a sandy texture with
some clay content. The landscape is comprised mostly of pines; with some
oaks, maples, gums, dogwoods, and wax myrtles scattered throughout the
area.
2. Soils and Slope
The most predominant soil type within the corporate limits
of Minnesott Beach is Alpin. Other major soil types which exist include
Baymeade and Conetoe. Each of the soil types have some degree of physical
7

limitation on development and the proper functioning of septic tank
systems. Yenansville is the most adequate, but amounts to less than
5% of the town's soil type materials. other suitable soils include
Conetce and Baymeade. Overall, Minnesott Beach's soil types are
generally better than the remainder of Pamlico County.
As stated, the topography is relatively flat with slope
elevations ranging from 1 to 5 percent. Steep enbankments are encountered
along some portions of the shorelines of the Neuse River and Alligator
Gut.
3. Vegetation
The town of Minnesott Beach has generally been carved from
stands of pine trees that have stood on the gently -rolling sandy banks.
With same hardwoods scattered throughout the area, the vegetative cover
has provided a nice complement to the attractiveness of the Neuse River.
Some aquatic plants exist along the estuarine shoreline
including cordgrass and spartina. A portion of this vegetation has been
artificially introduced by property owners to diminish the erosive effects
of wave action.
4. Mineral Resources
A major mineral resource that exists within the sedimentary
rock of Pamlico County and thus Minnesott Beach is phosphate. The likely
occurrence of such deposits is dictated by the level of sand content. In
the subsurfaces below Minnesott Beach a moderate concentration (50% to 75%
sand) occurs.
No other mineral resources are known to exist.
C. CCb24UNITY DESCRIPTION
1. General Description
The character of Minnesott Beach has basically remained the
0

same with residential development continuing to be the primary land use
(See Map/Graphic 3). Sane change in the types of residential development
has taken place over the past five years as condominiums/townhouses
have been built. These units are intended for full-time or seasonal
use by the owners. Otherwise, the additional units in the town have
been conventional single-family residences. The marina facility, cited
in the 1980 land use plan, has also been colpleted with some expansion.
The paragraphs below, along with Sections 5, 6, and 7, provide
additional details about present land use patterns.
2. Commercial land Use
Cam ercial development has not changed significantly in
the town. Develop ent associated with marina improvements has constituted
the most significant change in the landscape of the town. Commercial
development and activity in vicinity of the Highway 306 junction has
virtually remained the same since the previous land use plan was written.
3. Residential Land Use (Housing)
The following breakdown depicts the residential character
of Minnesott Beach.
Single Family Units Multi -Family Mobile Hares Vacant
110 19 46 N/A
Source: Rich Hall, Planning Intern, East Carolina University Regional
Development Institute.
4. Tourism
No significant increase in tourist -related development of
services has been noted in Minnesott Beach over the planning period.
The local marina codex and golf course cater to the second -
hare and retired residents of the town. Supplemental tourist amenities
such as hotel/motel space and restaurants are limited in the immediate area.
0

Most tourists using the existing ferry service do not spend time in
Minnesott Beach.
No strong local desire to attract these tourists was
expressed during the planning process.
S. Local E ployment
a. Agricultural
No agricultural activities take place within the town
limits of Minnesott Beach and no prime agricultural lands exist within
the town limits.
b. Comwrcial Forestry
No =wercial forestry operations exist within the town
limits of Minnesott Beach.
c. Ccauercial Fishing/Recreational Fishing
Though caimercial fishing takes place off shore from '
Minnesott Beach, no fishing operations originate out of the Town of
Minnesott Beach.
Recreational Fishing is limited in the municipality.
d. Peat Mining
No operations related to peat mining take place within
the town limits of Minnesott Beach. Nearest peat resource exists
approximately 4.5 miles northeast of Minnesott Beach. The presence
of resource does not directly affect the Town of Minnesott Beach.
e. Major Riployment
Major employment within Minnesott Beach is associated
with the marina, Country Club and real estate interests, while major
employers outside the locality consist of the Cherry Point Marine Base
and Texas Gulf phosphate operation.
10

G. SXisting Land Use
The town of Minnesott Beach has remained the same size
since the development of the 1980 Land Use Plan. The town's 980 acres
are still primarily undeveloped with the Minnesott Beach Golf and Country
Club being the largest amount of land use (203 acres) within the town
limits. The golf course itself takes up approximately 95% of the 203
acres with the Club House, parking lot, tennis court, and undeveloped
property comprising the balance.
Nearly 250 residential lots remain plotted but undeveloped
while over 600 acres of the town is forested and unplotted vacant
property. Based upon the town's topographic features and zoning
requirements, it is estimated that total buildout of the town would
constitute approximately 580 lots. The existing land use map (See Map/
Graphic 3 on page 12) graphically depicts the present land use profile.
In addition, the town surrounds nearly 100 unincorporated
acres bordering the Neuse River.
7. Existing Iand Use Ccapatibility
Due to the small size and the predominance of single-family
residences and the golf course, Minnesott Beach does not experience
significant conflicts between land uses. Generally, the land uses
are well separated where development has taken place.
The State Ferry Dock operated by the North Carolina Department
of Transportation is located at the terminus of N.C. 306 at the eastern-
most point of the town. The dock itself and the traffic it generates is
not a source of cm -plaints. There is ongoing concern ssrounding the
contributing impact of the wave action along the surrounding shoreline
properties.
11

I SCALE
Map Graphi
MINN
ORECP
SING
COMI
0000
�000 COW
.....
••••• MUITI
® GOVEI...,..1.....,
SOURCE: U.S. CORPS. OF ENGINEERS PREPARED BY E.C.U. R.O.I.
P.S.P.

The golf course and the marina both are developed in such
a manner that blends well with the residential nature of the community.
The only related problem proves to be the inability to traverse the
town quickly due to the golf course splitting the town in half. Since
most services came from the north (i.e. fire, rescue) this does not
prove to be an insurmountable problem.
The nearby YMCA camp, Camp Seagull, is seasonal and blends
in well with the town. No complaints or problems were raised concerning
the camp.
8. Changes in Land Use
Based upon the past, residential development will occur
at a relatively slow pace. The northwestern section of town is still
unplotted and remains a speculative area. An area off of Country Club
Drive West is still projected to be an artificial water body (lake)
with plotted single-family lots nearby. As of this writing, no action
has been undertaken or is anticipated in the near future.
Since the 1980 land Use Plan, the development of a marina
on the western side of the golf course has taken place. Development
associated with this improved water inlet is possible.
Other changes include the development of multi -family
condominium units adjacent to N.C. 306 and the ferry dock site. This
site consists of 15 units with a second stage being planned. No other
significant changes in land use patterns has taken place.
9. Unplanned Development Potential
As mentioned, Minnesott Beach has groan from an out-of-
the-way destination point for recreationers to a residential community
with recreation amenities. Those older cottages and buildings of those
13

by -gone days are reminders of the town's previous character.
Because the character of the town has changed and the
buildings are generally in disrepair, the older buildings are now seen
as "detractions" by sane of the town's residents. Since no local
standards were in effect at the time of construction, such problems
are inherent.
Through the process of incorporation and the implementation
of a zoning ordinance, potential problems related to density and soil
suitability have been rectified. The existing residences and buildings
resulting from unplanned development practices represent a small portion
of the town's overall building stock. The zoning ordinance prevents
any change in these "nonconforming" uses and also limits the amount of
structural modification which is allowed to take place. Should the
structures further deteriorate to a point of constituting safety hazards
the local building code provisions of Pamlico County will be administered.
10. Areas of Environmental Concern
The types of Areas of Environmental Concern are designated
in Minnesott Beach. They include Coastal Wetlands, Estuarine Waters,
Estuarine Shoreline, and Public Trust Waters. These areas are ones in
which the State of North Carolina regulates the approval of development
activities in accordance with G.S. 113A-113b (Coastal Area Management
Act).
a. Coastal Wetlands
Coastal wetlands or marshlands are defined as any salt
marsh or other marsh subject to regular or occasional flooding by tides,
including wind tides (whether or not the tide waters reach the marshland
14

areas through natural or artificial watercourses), provided this shall
not include hurricane or tropical storm tides. Coastal marshlands also
contain some specific marsh plant species.
- patches along Alligator Gut in Minnesott Beach
- smith Gut
b. Estuarine Waters and Estuarine Shorelines
The estuarine waters are those bodies of waters where
fresh inland and salty coastal waters mix. This mixture produces a
nutrient -rich habitat for aquatic plants, animals, and fish. The Neuse
River and the nearby Pamlico Sound are both examples of estuarine
waters.
Estuarine shorelines are those non -ocean shorelines which
are especially vulnerable to erosion, flooding, or other adverse effects
of wind and water and are intimately connected to the estuary. This
area extends from the mean high water level or normal water level along
the estuaries, sounds, bays, and brackish waters for a distance of 75
feet landward.
As an AEC, Estuarine shorelines, although characterized
as dry land, are considered a catponent of the estuarine system because
of the close association with the adjaoent estuarine waters. Estuarine
waters and adjacent estuarine shorelines make up the most significant
components of the estuarine system in Minnesott Beach. The significance
of the estuarine system is that it is one of the most productive natural
environments of North Carolina. it not only supports valuable canrercial
and sports fisheries, but is also utilized for commercial navigation,
recreation and aesthetic purposes. Species dependent upon estuarines
include menhaden, shrimp, flounder, oysters, and crabs. These species
make up over 90 percent of the total value of North Carolina's cam ercial
15

catch. These species must spend all or part of their life cycle in
the estuary. The preservation and protection of these areas are
vitally important. The estuarine waters and adjacent estuarine shorelines
orprise the entire southern boundary of Minnesott Beach.
-approximately 2.3 miles adjacent to the Neuse River
-Alligator Gilt
-Smith Gut
c. Public Trust Waters
Public trust waters are partially defined as all waters of
the Atlantic ocean and the lands thereunder from the mean high water
mark to the seaward limit of state jurisdiction; all natural bodies of
water subject to measurable lunar tides and lands thereunder to the
mean high mark; all navigable natural bodies of water and lands thereunder
to the mean high water level or mean water level, as the case may be.
In other words, public trust areas are waters and adjacent lands, the
use of which, benefits and belongs to the public.
- In Minnesott Beach, all of the waters previously
listed as Estuarine Waters.
� � � •• is �� Y4�_1��4.
constraints, both physical and man-made, represent the
limitations of growth potential placed upon the municipality.
The most significant constraint in Minnesott Beach is the
estuarine erosion area. This constraint threatens existing lands and
structures and clouds the future for other shoreline development. Being
low in elevation and along the Neuse River, flood hazards are inherent
in certain locations.
16

Soil limitations, though common throughout the region, are
not extremely severe for the low density development patterns in Minnesott
Beach. This is due largely in part to its location along the previously
mentioned Suffolk scarp.
Each Area of Environmental Concern (AEC's) located within
Minnesott Beach constitutes a natural constraint to local development
actions.
Neither of the basic local services, the water system or
garbage collection service, stand as constraints. The lack of certain
community services (i.e. police, fire, wastewater treatment), could be
seen as deterrents to local development potential.
a. Estuarine erosion area
The shoreline of Minnesott Beach is a general pattern of
varying amounts of erosion. This pattern is countered with a variety
of erosion control devices inclusive of marsh grass, bulkheads, jetties,
and rip -rap, or no existing devices. At locations where prevention
techniques have been installed, further erosion has been countered. The
rate of erosion for unprotected properties, though not accurately logged
or depicted by resource accounts, has fluctuated over the past five years..
Sane steep slopes exist now along the shoreline, because of the cumalative
deteriorative impact of wave and wind action.
b. Soil Limitations
one of the overriding determinants of any land use plan
is the capability of the soil types to sustain development. one of the
primary reasons to review the general suitability of local soils is to
assess the feasibility of future sites for certain types of development.
All of the Town's soils are classified as having some degree of physical
17

limitations for development. The analysis (see page 20) indicates the
soils found in the Town and indicates their suitability for various
purposes. The indications of the analysis are beneficial for planning
purposes only. On -site inspections would be necessary to determine
specific soil properties for any developnent purpose. Since each type
is rated as having certain degrees of limitations, engineering practices
and construction techniques must be utilized wherever possible to
minimize the limiting affects on development.
A definition for each rating of soil type as determined
by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service is indicated below:
Slight: soil properties are generally favorable -for the
stated use, or limitations are minor and can be
easily overcame.
Moderate: Same soil properties are unfavorable, but
Limitations resulting from the properties can
be overcare or modified by special planning,
good design, and careful management.
Severe: Soil properties are unfavorable and resulting
limitations are too difficult to correct or over-
came. Soil will require major soil reclamation
or special design for stated uses. This rating
does not '=ply that the soil cannot be used.
very severe: This rating is a subdivision of the severe
rating and has one or more features so unfavorable
for the stated use that the limitation is very
difficult and expensive to overcame. Reclamation
would be very difficult, requiring the soil material
to be removed, replaced, or completely modified.
This rating is confined to soils that require extreme
modification and alteration, and are generally not
used for dwellings and septic tank filter fields.
These judgements are placed on several criteria inclusive
of the limitations on septic tanks, filter fields, units with/without
underground structure (basements), and local streets, roads, and playgrounds.
This information is based upon the carpositions of the soil(s) and observed
10

limitations and is developed by the U.S. Soil and Conservation Service.
For exanple, observations of filter beds for on -site
disposal of sewage failing on a given kind of soil are recorded. This
relates to the slaw permeability characteristic of the soil. Also,
the soil's capability to accon udate the construction of streets, road
pavements, and foundations for houses is related to the shrink -swell
(expansion) potential of the particular soil. Both of these indicators
provide basic assumptions for future site planning.
Efforts have been made within the TamIsZoning Ordinance
to direct development to take place on Alpin Soils. The limitations of
these soils in filtering leachate from local septic tank filter fields
underscores the need for law density develomrent. Even so, continued
development could necessitate consideration of the feasibility of a
public sewer system at a future date.
e. Ccmmnity Facilities/Services
Due to'the limited facilities/services (water, refuse
collection) provided by the town and their ability to meet present and
projected demand for these services; constraints to development must
be viewed as those facilities/services that do not exist.
The water system's source is two wells each producing
approximately 200 GPM. Presently, the system operates at an annual
average of 12% capacity. Peak load for the water system stands at
60,000 gallons per day with a total capacity of 500,000 gallons per
day. The water tank facility has a capacity of approximately 75,000
gallons and the local water softener has a capacity of 150 GPM. Present
water custarers number 140 users with 76% of those being full --time users.
Due to the relative remoteness of the municipality and
the cacmitment of the town not to encourage high intensity development,
19

Sou. TYPES:
Town OF MINNES= BEACH
Local
Septic Tank
Dwellings without
Dwellings with
Streets
Soil Unit
Filter Fields
Basements
Basements
and Roads
Playgrounds
Alpin
Severe - Poor
Slight
Slight
Slight
Severe
Sandy
Filter
Baymeade
Moderate
Slight
Moderate
Slight
Severe
Sandy
Wetness
Wetness
Conetoe
Slight
Slight
Slight
Slight
Moderate
Johnston
Severe, Flooding
Severe, Flooding
Severe, Flooding
Severer
Flooding
Severer Flooding
and Wetness
and Wetness
and Wetness
and Wetness
and Wetness
Kenansville
Slight Slight
Slight
Slight
Seveye
Leon
Severe Severe Wetness
Severe
Severe
Severe
Wetness
Wetness
Wetness
Wetness
Rutlege
Severe - Wetness Severe - Wet
Severe - Wet
Severe -
Severe - Wet
Poor Filtering
Wet
20

the lack of certain community facilities/services (i.e. wastewater)
restrains development possibilities.
Based upon present usage, the Town's water system could
service up to 1170 users. Projected build -out of Minnesott Beach would
add 580 additional users, still constituting only 61.5% of the system's
potential capacity. Also, this projection is assuming full-time users
which is quite unlikely given the present character of the town.
E. MAN-MADE HAZARDS
No significant man-made hazards exist in Minnesott Beach.
F. ESTIMATED CITIZEN DEMAND/SATISFACTION
The growth potential of a municipality is also dictated by
the capability to meet service demands and the satisfaction of the
residents with the services provided. As stated, service capacity is
being met adequately for those services provided by the Town.
The following exhibit provides insight into the level
of satisfaction that exists within Minnesott Beach. The findings are
based upon the Citizen Survey which was conducted. It will be analyzed
further in a later section.
21

IoT4To 70. va W.
No
Missing
Service
Excellent
Good
Average
Poor
inions
TOTAL
Data
Public water system
Full-time
2
20
9
6
0
37
Seasonal
4
6
5
0
0
15
Non-resident
0
11
6
2
22
.41
Totals
6
37
20
8
22
93
5
Septic system
Full-time
7
14
7
1
5
34
Seasonal
0
5
4
2
3
14
Non-resident
1
5
6
3
25
40
Totals
8
24
17
6
33
88
9
Town streets
Full-time
2
19
13
3
0
37
Seasonal
0
5
8
2
0
15
Non-resident
0
9
12
6
13
40
Totals
2
33
33
11
13
92
6
Drainage
Full-time
7
18
9
4
0
38
Seasonal
0
6
5
1
3
15
Non-resident
1
8
10
2
19
40
Totals
8
32
24
7
22
93
5
Trash Collection
Full-time
11
23
3
0
1
38
Seasonal
0
12
2
0
1
15
Non-resident
1
5
5
1
28
40
Totals
12
40
10
1
30
93
4
Recreation
Full-time
2
7
7
18
2
36
Seasonal
0
3
6
3
3
15
Non-resident
1
7
7
5
20
40
Totals
3
17
20
26
25
91
6
22

of Vital Information
No
Missing
Service
Excellent
Good
Average
Poor
Cpinions
TOTAL
Data
Town Goverment
Full-time
0
13
18
7
0
38
Seasonal
0
4
5
2
4
15
Non-resident
0
5
5
3
27
40
Totals
0
22
28
12
21
93
4
Fire Protection
Full-time
3
12
14
7
0
36
Seasonal
0
5
5
2
3
15
Non-resident
0
5
7
0
28
40
Totals
3
22
26
9
31
91
6
Safety (Police)
Protection
Full-time
2
7
11
14
2
36
Seasonal
0
2
3
7
3
15
Non-resident
0
3
5
1
30
39
Totals
2
12
19
22
35
90
7
Emergency Preparedness
Full-time
1
5
13
12
6
37
Seasonal
0
1
3
3
8
15
Non-resident
0
2
6
1
31
40
Totals
1
8
22
16
45
92
5
Street Lighting
FIAT -time
7
12
14
4
1
38
Seasonal
1
6
3
4
1
15
Non-resident
0
10
9
3
18
40
Totals
8
28
26
11
20
93
Rescue/Ambulance
Services
Full-time
3
14
14
4
0
35
Seasonal
0
1
4
3
6
14
Non-resident
0
4
3
2
31
40
Totals
3
19
21
9
37
89
4 1
23

aosstabulation of Vital Information
Residence Status (rows)
with Public service
(columns)
No
Missing
Service
Excellent
Good Average Poor
Cpinions
TOTAL Data
Medical Services
Full-time
2
11 13 8
2
36
Seasonal
0
1 1 6
6
14
Non-resident
0
3 4 5
28
40
Totals
2
15 18 19
36
90 7
Education
Rill -time
Seasonal
Non-resident
Totals
3 7
19
5
3
37
0 0
5
2
7
14
0 5
5
4
26
40
3 12
29
11
36
91
A
n
24

�'104WVIORii1�:�7
I• F.11 Q1 I QM ki Lejo;ly9M

A. PLAN FORMULATION
MEWOOMM�PT,
The development of this land use plan was a series of
actions which attempted to establish the present situation in Minnesott
Beach, then accumulate a record of past actions and changes related to
the town's evolution; comparing the two to understand the past direction
and project the direction that the locality is headed. A schedule (see
following page) was designed to guide the process and ensure appropriate
local input, analysis, and citizen participation.
2. Local Input
Information from local citizens was basically obtained
through a mail survey. The survey was mailed to 201 households. These
households represented full-time residents and seasonal residents, as
well as property owners within the incorporated limits. The survey
instrLmmt (see appendix) was designed to gather opinions on various
subjects and issues which have or could be of concern in Minnesott
Beach. Local news releases and notices were also provided in order to
maximize the visibility of the process. Sixty-three percent (63%) of
the surveys were returned, tabulated by cmputer, and analyzed over a
series of meetings and discussions.
other highlights of the information -gathering process
were as follows:
- Surveys mailed to all residents and property owners of
Minnesott Beach. The mailing was based upon water
customers and County property records. Sixty-three
percent (63%) of surveys were returned, tabulated by
computer, and analyzed.
25

m
PLANNING SCHEDULE - TOWN OF MINNESOTT BEACH
LAND USE PLAN UPDATE
Sanr Mr Nnv naa T— r.A . v.•.. •.._
I. Citizen Participation
1. Identify local advisory Sroup
2. Prepare citizen participation
plan
3. Develop input tools
_
4. Educational Efforts
contin
ing
5. Public Awareness
coot
nuin
6. Public Hearings
I1. Policy Development
1. Assess Present Conditions
Plans/Policies
2. Evaluate public concerns
3. Establish public priorities
4. Special Issue Identification
-
5. Draft Policy Statements
6. Review Reassess Policy Statements
7. Finalize Policy Statements
I1. Background
1. Data Collection
2. Base Map Development
3. Special Area Maps
4. Graphics Development
IV. Plan Development
1. Preliminary Draft
2. Final Draft
J. Acceptance

- Nine meetings of the Planning Board and/or Town Council
were held and input received to guide the planning process.
- Three reviews of the planning elements were completed
with the Mayor.
- Interviews (one-on-one) with several prominent local
residents and develogrent interests took place during
the process.
- A day -long workshop was held at the Town Hall on the
problems of shoreline erosion, protection, and nourish-
ment. Officials from North Carolina State University,
East Carolina University, Division of Coastal Management,
Sea Grant Program, and North Carolina Department of
Transportation attended the workshop to offer comments,
make suggestions, and respond to questions of the local
citizens and officials.
3. Issue Identification
In addition to those policy issues prated by the North
Carolina Coastal Management Act, several local issues were also identified.
Certain issues and the level of local concern were assessed through the
above processes and the following is a synopsis of the findings.
- SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE. Erosion continues
to be a problem along the riverfront. The impact of bulk-
heads, jetties, and nourishment on unprotected properties
continues to be a source of contention. Information gleaned
from the workshop indicates that erosion will continue,
tempered only by natural buffers, bulkheads, and/or
jetties. This issue was raised in the previous plan, by
the Planning Board, and through the survey responses.
- ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS. Water quality in the Neuse,
Alligator Gut, and other nearby water bodies is of great
concern. This issue was identified in the previous plan,
by the Mayor, by the Planning Board, and through the
survey responses.
- PUBLSC AWARIIESS. Despite the small size of the torn,
many citizens felt that they were not aware of the actions
and policies of the Town. This was mentioned in the survey
responses.
27

- PUBLIC SERVICES. It was felt that sane public services
were good (i.e. public water and garbage collection).
Others such as fire/police, recreation, and medical
services did not rate well. The deficiency of these
were mentioned in the survey and by the Planning Board
during its meetings.
- PUBLIC BEACH ACCESS. On this issue, the citizens were
sharply divided. While the majority of survey respondents
favor having a public beach, almost 28% are not in favor
of it. This issue was identified by the Mayor, the
Planning Board, via the surveys, and during the workshop.
- ENFORCEMEBTr TOOLS. The Town now controls development
through its zoning ordinance and CAMA enforcement regula-
tions, while the county enforces local septic tank
regulations. Public opinion was strongly in favor of
continuing and/or increasing available development controls
on the state and local levels. Other tools have been
discussed, including subdivision regulations, an appearance
ordinance, and anti -bulkhead ordinances. This issue was
pointed out by the Planning Board, the Mayor, and during
the workshop.
- OVERALL TOWN DEVELOPMENT. Concern was voiced over main-
taining the quality appearance of the town. Items discussed
included mobile hares, large facilities, mining and forestry
operations, and large-scale commercial developments. A
continuation of the low density,single-family development
at an accelerated pace was voiced by a sizeable portion
of respondent groups (full-time, seasonal, property owners).
The unincorporated sector of the town was also seen as a
development issue.
4. Intergovernmental Cooperation
In order to accurately project the actions and issues related
to the Town of Minnesott Beach, one must determine the course of Pamlico
County and the Town of Arapahoe, as well as any authorized local service
authority. Both government entities were contacted and discussions were
held to determine any actions, policies, or regulations which could impact
the Town of Minnesott Beach. Also, persons responsible for developing
plans which would impact Minnesott Beach were contacted for information.
The following intergovernmental services were reviewed.
Their present situation as well as future plans were taken into consi-
m

deration in the development of the Town's policies. A synopsis of these
services and plans appear below:
Proposed
Service/Action
Unit of Government
Actions/Plans
Sewer Service
County Authority
Phased sewer service
does not include
Minnesott Beach
Rescue/Emergency
County Authority
Continuing present
operation
Law Enforcement
Pamlico County
Continuing present
operation
Education
Pamlico County
No capital improvement
plans directly impacting
Minnesott Beach
Sanitary Landfill Pamlico County No plans directly impacting
Minnesott Beach
Fire Town of Arapahoe Existing situation
continuing
Recreation Pamlico County No development sites
located in Minnesott Beach
Building Permit Pamlico County Continuing present
operation
The following individuals were contacted and used for
coordination in the assessment of the local situation and the development
of this plan:
Vicki Deal. . . . . . . . .
. .Pamlico county Sanitarian
William Rice. . . . . . .
. . .County Manager
Charles Toler . . . . . .
. . .county Planner/IIrergency Coordinator
Betty Mason . . . . . . .
. . .Pamlico County Recreation Coordinator
*Tim Beatley . . . . . . .
. . .Planner, Coastal Resources
Collaborative, Ltd.
Randy Beaman. . . .
. . .Tax Supervisor
Soil conservationist. . .
. . .U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service
*Preparing Pamlico County Land Use Plan.
29

5. Current Plans, Manaqement Tools, and Policies
Currently, the Town of Minnesott Beach has developed only
one management tool requiring local administration. The town did adopt
a zoning ordinance and accompanying zoning map since the last land use
planning cycle. A local zoning administrator reviews all plans prior
to these being sent to the building inspector for county approval. The
town did not develop a subdivision ordinance. But some restrictive
covenants do still exist for a majority of the tam's developed area.
All building permits, electrical permits, and plumbing
Permits are issued by Pamlico county. Health -related permits are issued
by the County Health Department.
The town depends upon State and Federal enforcement officials
to regulate development actions impacted by State and Federal environmental
laws.
7he implementation of local policies is limited to the
application of the zoning ordinance and the implementation steps called
for in the 1980 land use plan. A synopsis of the status of those policies
appear on page 34 (Exhibit 8).
B. 1980 POLICY EFFECTIVE2ESS REVIEW
The Town has experienced a wide range of results related to
the application of its previously adopted policies (1980 Plan).
The zoning ordinance, as adopted, is designed as a framework
to further the town's desired development pattern. In addition, it has
sought to ensure environmental integrity in the town through its low
density and recognition of certain soil limitations. Further environmental
consideration is exhibited in the ordinance through its identification of
"conservation" areas and restrictive development practices throughout
these areas.
30

since the adoption of the 1980 Lard Use Plan, the Town of
Minnesott Beach has seen mostly detached, single-family residential
development within its corporate limits. This type of housing development
has been consistent with the relevant adopted policies. The vast
majority of the residential development has been on inland properties
and not along the Neuse River.
No evidence of policy action inconsistent with the environmental
concerns noted in the 1980 Plan have been indicated during the planning
process.
Fifteen multi -family units (Sea Gall Villas) have been
constructed since 1980 adjacent to the shoreline. These units were built
on approximately six acres of property previously designated cxnmercial
properties (C-2). The zoning was changed to allow this construction
(Phase 1). The placement of mobile hares on this property would have been
allowable under this zoning change, thus being in conflict with Policy 9.
A second phase and third phase are planned for the remainder of the
designated BM district. Upon completion, the site will have eleven
structures (55 individual units) on the entire six acres.
The other zoning change involved another small site for
multi -family units near the marina (See page 64).
A subdivision ordinance for Minnesott Beach did not
materialize over the planning period contrary to Policy 8. This did not
prove to be an insurmountable problem for the town as development occurred
in previously subdivided parcels only.
Though the new housing construction has been primarily
in the inland sections of town, the problem of estuarine shoreline erosion
has persisted for existing residences. Faced with conflicts between the
31

retention of personal property and the lack of viable alternatives the
Town was not able to follow through with Policy 2. No disallowance of
the use of erosion control structures was embodied into the local zoning
ordinance. The town has viewed the problem as one which must continue
to be reviewed to be sure that appropriate actions are taken by both
the town and individual property owners. The town did incorporate into
its zoning ordinance appropriate setback requirements which would minimize
potential property damage from estuarine shoreline erosion.
Crnmercial development has been very limited in Minnesott
Beach. Those changes have been in connection with the expansion of the
local marina. The marina stands as part of the man-made amenities which
the town's residential growth has been contingent upon over the last
decade. All development has been consistent with federal and state
policies governing the development of marinas in the coastal area. The
local government has supported the enforcement of such requirements
consistent with Policy 6, Policy 4, and Policy 15.
The services of the town have remained limited due to
its geographic isolation and small population base. Recognizing Policy
11, the town has reviewed and investigated certain possibilities and
alternatives to the present situation. No feasible alternatives were
reached during the planning period.
The town walks a line between developing amenities which
will attract tourists and those which will improve the quality of life
for its citizens. Waterfront development and beach access are two of
the delicate points on that line. Because of the possible implications
of a waterfront development and lack of funding sources for a planning
study, the town has not pursued Policy 14. The lack of beach access for
the citizenry still poses a local problem. Though potential properties
32

have been identified, requests for funding their acquisition is not
anticipated due to the management and maintenance costs involved.
No incidents or charges concerning degradation of any
environmental elements were brought by any state or federal office
during the planning period. The town did not seek any permits from
the Army Corps of Engineers or N.C. Coastal Management Program. The
town has continued its participation in the National Flood Insurance
Program.
33

Policy
Number
EXHIBIT 8 - 1980 LOCAL POLICIES*
Related
Policy Actions
1
The Town recognizes the
1)
The denser zoning classification
importance of helping to prevent
corresponds with the Alpin
further significant deterioration
soil type. This soil type is
of the water quality of the Neuse
characterized by poor filtration
River.
when too many septic tanks are
installed.
2)
No subdivision regulations have
been adopted for the Town of
Minnesott Beach.
2
The Town desires to ensure that
1)
The zoning ordinance does
shoreline development does not
not effectively deal with
significantly harm the estuarine
this problem.
system. Furthermore, alterations
to the shoreline in terms of
2)
No subdivision regulations
erosion -control strictures will
have been adopted for the
not be permitted by the Town on
Town of Minnesott Beach.
the Neuse River, but will be left
to individual landowners in other
areas.
3
The Town recognizes the environ-
1)
Coastal wetlands have been
mental value of coastal marshes
designated in the local
and desires to protect then from
zoning ordinance.
significant damage.
2)
Conformance to state and
federal laws is included
within the zoning ordinance.
4
The Town will not restrict the
1)
Recognition of land uses
public's right to navigation in
adjacent to public trust areas
public trust areas and wishes to
is allowed for but standards
perpetuate their biological value.
are generalized.
2)
No adverse land use designations
are identified on the zoning
map adjacent to public trust
areas.
5
It is the policy of the Town to
1)
Regulations regarding open
encourage the retention of
space and vegetation as related
vegetation, preserve open space,
to the "conservation" areas
and to allow the natural terrain
are included in existing
to be disturbed as little as
ordinance.
possible.
2)
No on -going public education
programs exist.
*Adopted in
1980 Town of Minnesott Beach Land use
Plan.
34

Policy Related
Number Policy Actions
The Town will not permit develop-
ment or land uses which will
degrade the quality of the surface
waters, groundwater, or signifi-
cantly lower the water quantity in
the aquifer.
1) Zoning densities are low
intensity (R-20) (R-15)
throughout the municipality.
2) Flood regulations are being
enforced locally.
The Town is primarily a residential 1) Little applicability to the
cavity and therefore does not Town's resources or potential
desire to promote agriculture, development pattern.
forestry, mining, fisheries, industry,
energy facilities, or -tourist -
related recreation.
The Town will develop a zoning 1) Zoning ordinance has been
ordinance and subdivision regu- developed, adopted, and is
lation based upon the capacity of being implemented.
the area to support development and
with concern for environment. 2) Subdivision ordinance has
not been developed for
adoption.
9 The Town desires to maintain 1) The municipality has limited
primarily single-family detached the amount of area for high
residential development as well density residential development.
as limited and well maintained
milti-family town house units. The 2) County/Municipal cooperation
Town does not desire further mobile has assured proper building
hone use. design and maintenance.
10 The canrercial zone proposed on the 1) Cacmercial space has been
draft zoning map is acceptable as provided for in zoning
constituted and will not be increased. ordinance but reduced from
Uses permitted in this zone will be original size.
only those which are necessary to
supply basic needs of the town
residents.
11 The Town will continue to develop 1) No changes have occurred in
and study alternatives to the current fire and policy protection
fire and police protection problem. services. The development of
fire protection has been
limited to Arapahoe. Some
discussion of purchasing fire
equipment has taken place.
35

Policy Related
Nucber Policy Actions
12
The Town will design its zoning
1)
Within the constraints of
map using the capability of the
existing soil limitations,
soils to accanrodate on -lot sewage
the zoning map of Minnesott
disposal to limit densities on
Beach has been designed.
those soils unsuitable for on -lot
sewage disposal.
13
The Town will continue to study the
1)
sane additional upgrading
road problems associated with Country
of streets and roadways has
Club Drive and Country Club Drive
been accomplished through
West. The Town will continue to
Powell Bill funds.
attempt to gain further citizen
support to actively pursue improve-
ments and set aside funds for such
improvements. off road vehicles are
not considered to be a problem and no
policy is necessary at this time.
14
The Town will attest to seek grant
1)
No waterfront redevelopment
or loan funds to complete a study on
plan has been developed.
the waterfront area to determine
alternatives for its redevelopment.
15
The Town does not oppose the continued
1)
No nomicipal action for
state maintenance of roads, the CANA
implementation was necessary.
program, the Army Corps of Engineers
jurisdiction over wetlands and naviga-
tion, and continued operation and main-
tenance of present system.
16
The Town does not desire the location
1)
No municipal action for
of major facilities in or near the
implementation was necessary.
camunity.
17
The Town will seek to acquire
1)
No efforts are being made
waterfront property.
to implement this policy.
36

POLICY F 144UTATION

SECTION THREE: POLICY
The foundation of any land use plan is the formulation .
of specific policy statements and explanations of their implementation
to guide local government decisions. These policies are based upon
local conditions and should represent the application of local
priorities, needs and desires while being cognizant of the intent of
certain State and Federal plans (i.e. Coastal Management Act of 1974).
The policies represent the locality's attempt to balance their individual
priorities and needs with the greater ones of the public in general and
the environmant in particular.
In order to acccaiplish this, the Plan will address all
relevant points; whether local or coastal -wide. In doing so, the
policies will fall into five primary areas. Though some overlapping may
occur, the policies are placed in the subject area that is best related
to its intent. The five primary areas include:
A. Natural Resource Protection
B. Resource Production and Management
C. Economic and Comcamity Development
D. Citizen Participation
E. Hurricane/Storm Hazard Mitigation
The following policies represent the basic framework of the
municipality's approach to land management and resource conservation
over the next planning period. They will be generally discussed with a
follow-up that outlines basic actions and results which are anticipated.
A. NATURAL RESOURCE PRC7rFMON POLICIES
1. Areas of Environmental Concern
The Town of Minnesott Beach recognizes its role as a
protector of the public's resources in concert with the Coastal Resources
37

Commission. The most important areas to be identified for protection
are the Areas of Environmental Concerns (AFC's) (See Map/Graphic 4
on next page)* These dynamic, natural features of the environment represent the
most sensitive and valuable assets of the unique coastal environment
of North Carolina. These areas are limited in Minnesott Beach in both
size and number. This does not diminish the responsibilities to enact
thoughtful policies that will maintain their integrity.
Coastal wetlands exist around the edge of Alligator Gut
near the present Marina facilities and along Smith Gut. Their protection
is needed to ensure productive nursing areas for aquatic life.
Also, the estuarine waters, which exist in Minnesott Beach
are considered public trust waters. The identified policy deals with
the management of these waters/areas and the prevention of development
encroachment upon their capability to support commercial and recreational
fisheries, wildfowl habitat, or to serve as an aesthetic resource.
The quality of the estuarine system, of which these are
components, is directly related to the quality of the marine food chain
along the North Carolina coast. in addition, the natural attractiveness
of these components are elements of the lure that attracts people to live
by or near our waters.
The estuarine shoreline (area extending 75 feet landward
of the mean high waterline of the estuarine waters), because of occasional
flooding and the erosive effects of some tidal action, can have a direct
impact upon the quality of the estuarine waters. Because of the conflict
between the local government's attempts to maintain shoreline property for
public and private use while minimizing the adverse impact on adjacent
estuarine water quality, a suitable policy and actions have been developed.
*Note: These maps depict the general location and extent of areas
designated as Areas of Environmental Concern.
KE

MAP/C MBIq 4 ..
PREPARED BY E.C.U. R.O.I.
39 P.S.P.

Parts of the estuarine shoreline of Minnesott Beach have experienced
varying degrees of erosion over the past five years.
The adopted policy attempts to achieve the delicate balance
between certain local needs and the overall enviromental good. A review
of those AFC's located in Minnesott Beach are as follows:
a. Coastal Wetlands
As defined, coastal wetlands are regularly flooded salt
marsh areas containing certain plant species. Though very small in size
and productivity, coastal wetlands do exist in Minnesott Beach in the
Alligator Gut and Smith Gut (See Map/Graphic on page 39). The town
recognizes the importance of these areas for conservation.
b. Estuarine Waters/Shorelines
These two (AEC's) Areas of Environmental Concern constitute
the bulk of the local municipality's management concerns. Approximately
2.8 miles of estuarine shoreline with adjacent estuarine water exists
in Minnesott Beach (See Map/Graphic 3 on page 12). These consist of the
Neuse River and Alligator Gut areas.
C. Public Trust Waters/Areas
These waters and their adjacent lands are defined in part
as all water of the Atlantic Ocean and lands thereunder from the mean
high water mark to the seaward limit of state jurisdiction; all natural
bodies of water subject to measurable lunar tides and lands thereunder
to the mean high water mark, all navigable natural bodies of waterlands
thereunder to the mean high water level or mean water level. These
waters and their adjacent areas are those which benefit and belong to
the public. Policies to ensure the maintenance of these areas include:
40

THE TOWN DESIRES TO INSURE THAT FUTURE SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT
(INCLUSIVE OF RESIDENCES, COMMERCIAL USES, AND MARINAS) DOES NOT
SIGNIFICANTLY HAR4 THE ADJACENT ESTUARINE WATERS (AEC) OR THE
OVERALL ESTUARINE SYSTEM.
•', • •,• • w 1 • • w 1 1 • a•. 1 n •
• • 71• 1 171 • 7 IIM I• • •w71• • 91• 71 � li BI•! P
• 1. 91 • •' 1 w d •1 w 1 ••' 1
•• .•,• 1r• •• a ••• • • 711 ••••I•
• • • 91S 1 • • 1 171 041 1 looll'
r • 7171 • •,• a • 1 I 1 • • • �a /
5•. • If
I• ' 1 I I• 71•
EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOM W31L MINIMIZE SHORELINE EROSION
PROBLEMS WITHf ADVERSELY IMPACTING TH1 • • • } li •' ED AREAS OF
WEIVIRONMENTAL CONCERN • a
THE TOM WILL NOT RESTRICT THE PUBLIC'S RIGHT TO NAVIGATION IN
PUBLIC TRUST AREAS (AEC) TO PERPETUATE THEIR BIOLOGICAL VALUE.
ACTION ONE: DISALLOW ANY LADED USE DESIGNATIONS ADJACENT TO
PUBLIC TRUST AREAS THAT ARE INCONSISTENT WITH 15 NCAC 7H (NORTH CAROISNA
ADMINISTRATIVE CODE).
ACTION TWO: PROVIDE APPROPRIATE STANDARDS WITHIN THE LOCAL CONTROL
ORDINANCES (ZONING AND SUBDIVISION) FOR THOSE ACCEPTABLE LMD USE
DESIGNATIONS.
• EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOWN WILL ENSURE THE PROTECTION OF
PUBLIC TRUST AREAS AS DEFINED BY THE NORTH CAROL COASTAL RESOURCES
COMMISSION.
THE TOWN RECOGNIZES THE ENVIRONMENTAL VALUE OF COASTAL NETT,ANDS
(AEC) AND DESIRES TO PROTECT THEM FROM SIGNIFICANT DAMAGE.
ACTION ONE: MAINTAIN DESIGNATION OF WETLANDS WITHIN THE LOCAL
ZONING ORDINANCE.
ACTION TWO: DISALLOW ANY LAND USE DESIGNATIONS THAT ARE INCON—
SISTENT WITH 15 NCAC 7H, (NORTH CAR INA. ADMINISTRATIVE CODE). (EXAMPLES
ARE UTILITY EASEDIENIS, FISHING PIERS, DOCKS, AGRICULTURAL USES, AND/OR
DRAINAGE USES).
.UY � 711 9 1 • 71 1 • •,• i ••
•• • 1 a N 1 121• I • • • •.• 1 •• • V• • ',w
••11 1 1 •'
41

2. Development in Areas with Iand Constraints (Hams or Fragile
Characteristics
a. Flood/Erosion Hazards
Due to the town's location along the Neuse River, some
water -related constraints are exerted upon the town's developrent.
Such natural hazards as estuarine flooding are minimized due to the
tam's relatively high elevation. only three structures exist within
the designated flood hazard zone. (See Map/Graphic 5/6 on pages 44-45).
The above condition actually accentuates problems related
to estuarine erosion that occur along the banks of the Neuse River.
The shoreline of Minnesott Beach shows a pattern of varying
levels of erosion impact. over the last 30 years the shoreline has
eroded over 75 feet, with shoreline elevations ranging from less than 5
feet to nearly 20 feet. The pattern has been countered with a variety of
erosion control devices inclusive of marsh grass, bulkheads, jetties,
and rip -rap. At sane locations, no existing devices exist. The rate
of erosion, though not accurately logged or depicted, has fluctuated
greatly over the past five years. At some points, erosion is
minimal while at other points steep slopes exist. The aforementioned
Erosion Workshop held in Minnesott Beach was the basis of local policies
related to this problem.
b. Soil Limitations
Soils, as previously mentioned, exert certain constraints
on local development. These limitations were previously outlined when
their inherent problems were discussed. In Minnesott Beach, the soil
types dictate that the installation of all septic tanks be approved by
the County Health Department. The ability of the soils to support
proposed structural foundations is determined by the Pamlico County
Building Inspector with assistance of the Soil Conservationist.
42

c. Slope
As previously stated, the slope of Minnesott Beach's
topography is relatively flat with sare roll that approaches 5% grade.
These are not developmzt constraints. The steep enbankmnts along the
Neuse River do represent significant constraints to future development.
Such conditions are prated by tidal action along the Neuse River.
d. Water Supply
The principal source for the public water supply for the
Minnesott Beach water system is the Castle Hayne aquifer. This highly
productive artesian is the same source for many public water supplies
in the area. This aquifer ranges from 200 to 400 feet in thickness and
is ca[q-osed of indurated shell limestone, domesticated shell linestones,
and beds of calcearous sand. The water is characteristically hard with
low chloride content, but highly productive.
Even though Pamlico County is underlain by thousands of
feet of sedimentary deposits only the upper few hundred feet contain
fresh water. In the western part of the county the depth to salty water
is in excess of 400 feet. This limestone aquifer is capable of yielding
several thousand gallons per minute of fresh water to individual wells.
The ability of the limestone to yield fresh water diminishes east of
Minnesott Beach. There are sands and shales of the upper sandy aquifer
overlying the limestone which can yield up to a few hundred gallons per
minute to individual wells. The maximum groundwater yield is estimated
at 1.0 (4gal/d)/mi2. Water from deep wells both in the upper sandy and
limestone aquifers tends to be very hard and alkaline, and may contain
excessive iron. The lower sandy aquifer contains only salt water within
the county.l Explanation of local actions to maintain the quality of
1Public Water Supplies of North Carolina, N.C. Department of Natural
and Economic Resources, January, 1977.
43

MAP/GRAPHIC 6
MINN
HUF
F
ate:
,x�, =
45 ECU. a.ni. es.e

water resources are identified under Subsection F.
Based upon the local situation (public system, low density)
the potable water supply would not appear to be a development constraint
for Minnesott Beach. The capability of the present system to provide for
the local need appears to be adequate well beyond the end of the planning
period (See page 21). Adopted policies within this text should further
reinforce the potential quality and quantity of the existing potable water
resources to serve the needs of Minresott Beach.
e. Man-made Hazards
These hazards are recognized as large facilities, structures,
or man -related action which would impede or restrict development options
in a given area. No significant hazards have been identified but the
ferry dock and the public water tank could be construed as potential
deterrants to land developent. Neither has been identified as a
pronunent issue during the planning process. The existence of Cherry
Point Marine Base and its local flight pattern close to Minnesott Beach
is not construed as a hazard by local residents. Agreements with the
base preclude flights directly over the town itself. In order to deal
with the presence of certain hazards (natural or man-made), the following
policies are issued:
THE TOWN WILL CONTINUE TO ENFORCE THE ADOPTED ZONING ORDINANCE AND
ITS INTENT INCLUSIVE OF DENSITY, SETBACCS, AND CONSERVATION AREAS.
ACTION ONE: MAINTAIN LOW -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS
BASED UPON SOIL I TATIOIS.
ACTIN TWO: REVIEW DEVELOPMENT OF ADDITIONAL MULTI -FAMILY HOUSING
UNITS (i.e. CONDOMINIUMS, APARDUNTS, ETC.) WITHIN PRESENT R-M DISTRICT.
ACTION THREE: LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF CCMMERCIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION
WITHIN THE TOWN.
ACTION FOUR: MAINTAIN THOSE AREAS DESIGNATED IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE
AS AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN INCLUSIVE OF COASTAL WETLANDS, ESTUARINE
SHORELINES, AND PUBLIC TRUST AREAS WITH ALL PERMITTED LAND USES BEING
CONSISTENT WITH 15 NCAC 7H (NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE).
46

a��• a a6111,
I • •• 1 u a
••. • I•' a1 • 1 I • 1 H 1• ' Y. 11 a M • a••C •'•
• a1 a '�•' la • a.
f. Soil Resource Protection
The Town will continue to minimize soil loss and water
degradation problems profited by stormwater drainage.
The Town will not dictate individual soil retention practices
along the Neuse River but will encourage efforts that are compatible
with CAMA standards and nearby control devices. Only uses permitted under
the Taan's zoning ordinance will be allowed along this area.
THE TOWN WILL NOT PERMIT LAND DEVELOPMENT PRACTICES WHICH WILL
DEGRADE LOCAL FRAGILE LAND AREAS, QUALITY OF SURFACE WATERS, QOUNDWP.TERS,
OR SIGNIFICANTLY LOWER THE QUANTITY OF WATER IN THE AQUIFER.
ACTION ONE: MAINTAIN PRESENT LAND DENSITIES WHICH WILL ENCOURAGE
THE CONTINUATION OF CONVENTIONAL, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
BASED UPON SOIL SUITABILITIES.
ACTION TWO: CONTINUE TO SUPPORT THE ENFORCEMENT OF IOC11L AND
STATE HEALTH DEPAR31VIENT REGULMIONS CONCERNING INDIVIDUAL SEPTIC TANK
INSTALLATION/OPERATION.
ACTION THREE: WILL DEVELOP SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE WITH APPROPRIATE
DRAINAGE GUIDELINES, LOT DESIGN STANDARDS, AND BUFFER REQUIPMVMM ALONG
WATER OUTLETS.
ACTION FOUR: CONTINUE TO ENFORCE LOCAL ZONING ORDINANCE TO MINII•4IZE
POTENTIAL SHORELINE EROSION.
EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOWN WILL ENSURE THE MAINTENANCE OF
FRAGILE LAND AREAS AND WATER QUALITY IMPACTED BY THEIR JURISDICTION
THROUGH AVAILABLE LAND MANAGEMENT TOOLS (I.E. ZONING, SUBDIVISION).
g. Cultural Resource Fragile Areas
Minnesott Beach may have been one of the earliest settled
areas in the county. Its sheltered position along Neuse River may have
been conducive to settlement during the eighteenth century. Artifacts
and sites, however, from this earlier period are now underwater due to
shore erosion. A camunity was not formed here until the 1920s, but
the area was settled and farmed before that time. The town, as it
47

exists today, began in the 1920s as a unincorporated riverside resort.
Minnesott Beach then served as a resort for much of Pamlico County and
and eastern North Carolina. Because of hurricanes, many of the 1920's
buildings were demolished. Due to the loss of these early buildings, no
structures appear on the states historic survey. A vast majority of the
buildings have been built since incorporation. (See Hazards/Constraints)
BEFORE ANY LAND ALTERATION TAKES PLACE IN THE ASA SITE, APPROPRIATE
STATE OFFICIALS WILL BE NOTIFIED.
ACTION ONE: THE bMZMSOTT BEACH PLANNING BOARD WILL MONITOR FUTURE
LAND DEVELOPMENT CHANGES IN THE SPECIFIED SITE.
Minnesott Beach realizes certain natural resource fragile
areas exist other than those designated as Areas of Environmental Concern
(AEC's). The soils, waters, and naturally forested areas can maintain a
native wildlife throughout the comunity as well as certain natural balance.
il 1 • • • •7P11 U • • 171 N IN •i•••i
• • I• • /` • 71 •• N P p• Md I• /• ]I• 0.
q
91 r • 91• I RIL624FOU 0 V WKS)P 21• 1 1 •.• M-,
ACTION• I MAINTAIN PRESENT LAND DENSITIES WHICHENCOURAGE
THE CONTINUATION OF • 71 •SINGLE-FAMILYRESIDENTIALDEVELOPMENT
BASED UPON SOIL
ACTIONTWO: CONTINUE • SUPPORT THE ENFORCEMENTOF • AND STATE
HEALTHDEPARTMENT REGULATIONS CONCERNING INDIVIDUAL S71• 1
INSTALLATION/OPERATION.
ACTION THREE: WILL DEVELOP SUBDIVISION ORDINA1,iCE WITH APPROPRIATE
DRAINAGE GUIDELINES, • DESIGN STANDARDS,D BUFFER, REQUIREMENTS •
WATER OUTLETS.
ACTION• CONTINUE • ENFORCE LOCAL• 1 ORDINANCE • MINIMIZE
POTENTIAL SHORELINE EROSION.
EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOM WILL INSURE THE MAINTENANCE OF
FRAGILE LAND AREAS AND WATER QUALITY 1I4PACTED BY THEIR JURISDICTION THROUGH
AVAILABLE LAND MANAGII1OIT TOOLS (I.E. ZONING, SUBDIVISION).
EN

3. Storm Hazard Mitigation, Post Disaster Recovery and
D1A, Timric
An entire section (see page 57) is included separately
for the hazards associated with hurricane and flood evacuation. Also
discussed are the hazards associated with post -storm redevelopment
problems.
B. RESOURCE PRODUCTION AMID MANAGEM=
Minnesott Beach does not have significant productive
resources that require management strategies to be developed. Certain
subject areas are included as they relate to the development of the
natural landscape.
1. Agriculture
No policies necessary (see page 10 ).
2. Commercial Forestry
No policies necessary (see page 10 ).
3. Mining Resource Areas
No policies necessary (see page UL).
4. C=mercial and Recreational Fisheries
No policies necessary (see page 10 ).
5. Off -Road Vehicles
The Town of Minnesott Beach does not have off -road vehicle
problems along the shoreline but has encountered problems along the
shoulders of local streets. This problem is addressed on page 53.
6. Residential and Commercial Land Development
The tam's geographic size and past growth pattern indicate
a moderate level of development potential over the planning period. The
desire to maintain quality residential development with some caRrercial
space remains the town's direction. Both types of development will be
49

guided by the local management tools, existing or proposed. Further
elaboration on local actions and policies will be provided in the
following section.
C. ECONCMIC AND C HgMTY DEVELOPMENT
1. Desired Land Development/Redevelopment
a. Residential/Commercial Development
As previously stated, the Town of Minnesott Beach is basically
residential with only peripheral commercial development. The town has
taken some gradual steps in addressing these problems through a zoning
ordinance but recognizes further steps are needed to ensure that proper
development actions are taken in the future. The town wishes to maintain
its character of predominantly single-fanily residences without Completely
excluding multi -family residences.
The town wishes to limit commercial development and gradually
upgrade the appearance of the existing commercial area. The town recognizes
that upgrading of the appearance of this area will be a gradual process
that is primarily dependent upon individual property owners. The
following policies will apply to residential and commercial development
in Minnesott Beach.
THE TOWN WITS, ENACT A SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AND CONTINUING TO ENFORCE
A LOCAL ZONING ORDINANCE, EACH HELPING To ENSURE APPROPRIATE DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF LOCAL ENVIRDNMENPAL FEATURES, THE ACCEPTA-
BLE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
ACTION ONE: ESTABLISH PROCESS FOR THE REVIEW OF ALL PLATS AND/OR
PROSPECTIVE DEVELOPMENT PLANS.
ACTION TWO: ENFORCE ACCEPTABLE LOT, STREET, DENSITY, AND AMENITY
DESIGN STANDARDS.
ACTICN THREE: LIMIT MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
ACTION FOUR: PROVIDE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES AND L]MITAOF
STORMWATER RUNOFF THROUGH THE INCCURAGIIMENT OF THE RETENTION OF VEGETATION,
PRESERVATION OF OPEN -SPACE, AND MINI = DISTURBANCE OF THE NATURAL TERRAIN
AS CONSISTENT WITH THE POLICY ACTIONS SPELLED OUT IN THE LAND USE PLAN.
50

EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOWN WILL ESTABLISH A SUBDIVISION
ORDINANCE WHICH WILL GUIDE ANY FUTURE SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT OR
REPLATTING OF EXISTING SUBDIVISIONS.
THE TagN WILL NOT OPPOSE REDEVELOPMENT OF EXISTING CU44ERCIAL
AREAS WITHIN THE TOWN LIMITS.
ACTION ONE: WILL MAINTAIN DESIGNATED COMMERCIAL AREA AS DESIGNATED
BY THE ADOPTED ZONING MAP.
ACTION TWO: MAINTAIN APPROPRIATE STANDARDS FOR (XI411ERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
WITH ADOPTED ZONING ORDINANCE.
ACTION THREE: WILL SEEK WAYS TO ATTRACT CCMMERCIAL SERVICES AS
NEEDED BY THE CITIZENRY.
ACTION FOUR: WILL WORK AS NEEDED BY THE CITIZENRY WITH COUNTY TO
ENFORCE APPLICABLE BUILDING CODE REGULATIONS.
EXPECTED RESULTS: THE CONTINUATION OF A LIlKITID COMMERCIAL
AREA WITH A GRADUAL UPGRADING OF SERVICES AND STRUCTURES.
b. Desired Industry or Facilities Siting
Due to the town's commitment to maintain a residential
character in the future, no desire to attract or promote industry is
indicated. The following policy underscores the intent of the town.
THE TOWN DOES NOT DESIRE TO PROMOTE AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY, MINING,
FISHERIES, INDUSTRY (LIGHT OR HEAVY), tNERGY FACILITIES, OR THE LOCATION
OF ANY MAJOR FACILITY IN OR IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE CCHMUNITY.
ACTION ONE: WILL ENFORCE ALL STATE, FEDERAL, AND LOCAL REGUTATIONS
(I.E. ZONING) RELATED TO THE OPERATION OR PLACEMENT OF THE AFOREMENTIONED
ACTIVITIES.
ACTION TWO: WILL NOT EXTEND SUCH SERVICES AS TO PROMOTE SUCH LAND
USES OR FACILITIES.
EXPECTED RESULTS: NO ACTIONS TO PRCMOTE THE LOCATION OF
THE MENTIONED FACILITIES OR ACTIVITIES WILL BE UNDERTAKEN BY THE 'TOWN.
2. Local Conmitment to Service Provisions
a. Service Adequacy
Since water service, garbage collection, roads, and street lights
are the only services provided by the town, they constitute the greatest
immediate concern by the governing board. Each of these proved to be at
a satisfactory level, both in present provisions and projected capacity
51

needs. The continuing improvement of locally -maintained streets was the
only local service which was mentioned with any regularity. This concern
was consistent with the 1980 Lazed Use Plan.
one service, the treatment and disposal of wastewater, is
done on a individual basis. Minnesott Beach is fortunate that its
topography and soil types make it atypical for Pamlico County, where many
sites for individual septic tanks are unsuitable.
The projected development of a centralized wastewater system
for other parts of the County does not include Minnesott Beach. The
anticipated system costs makes the construction improbable at the present
time.
The only other viable alternative for wastewater treatment
in Minnesott Beach is the introduction of Package Wastewater treatment
facilities. These smaller versions of conventional central wastewater
treatment facilities are camoonly used to treat.and dispose of wastewater
from multi -unit residences.
With the present low density development pattern and the
advantageous local conditions, the introduction of a policy concerning
package treatment plant facilities is not warranted.
Due to the travel distances involved and the relatively sparse
population concentration of southern Pamlico County, certain other services
(fire, police, and rescue) were identified by local residents. In
addition, the limitations of these services surfaced repeatedly during
public discussions.
Through recognizing citizen concerns, certain limitations on
the perfect resolution of these issues include the small tax bases of
52

Minnesott Beach and nearby Arapahoe, the lack of population numbers and
concentration, and the average age of the residents. Taking these
limitations into consideration, significant financial outlays and
total dependence upon volunteer assistance are not suitable answers.
The following policies were adopted to guide improved public services
within these limiting factors.
•r 0 ONE: IDENTIFY D PRIORITIZE LOCAL.••• NEEDS TO BE
ACTIONADDRESSED THROUGH AVAJJA= I= AND STATE FUNDS.
TWO: NOT PERMIT OPERATTNG OF N71 :I• MOTOR VEHICLES
OFF OF ROADS EXCEPTFOR • 71• OF PROPERTY.
ACTION THREE: PROMOTE PROPER ROAD DESIGN PRACTICES THROUGH TH2
ADOPTION OF A SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE.
EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOWN WILL MAINTAIN AN ADEQUATE
MUNICIPAL ROAD SYSTEM.
THE TOWN WILL INVESTIGATE CERTAIN OPERATIONAL CHANGES INCLUSIVE
OF COMBINATION OF SERVICES WITH OTHER LOCAL GOVEFa1ENTS. IN ADDITION,
THE TOWN WILL IDENTIFY LOCAL FUNDS IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT CERTAIN SYSTEMS
THAT WILL AUGMENT THE PRESENT LEVEL OF SERVICE.
ACTIN ONE: EXAMS LAW ENFORCEMENT AND PROTECTION ALTERNATIVES
INCLUSIVE OF A COMMUNITY WATCH APPROACH.
ACTION TWO: EXAMINE FIRE SERVICE EQUIPMENT CAPABILITIES/
RESPONSE TIME WITHIN LOCAL CCMKUNITY AND ESTABLISH CHANGES WHERE NECESSARY.
ACTION THREE: CCMPARE PROJECTED LOCAL COST OF SERVICES WITH
NEARBY CCNMCNITIES AND SIMILAR SIZE COMMUNITIES.
ACTIN FOUR: IDENTIFY AND PROVIDE UPDATED LIST OF HEALTH CARE
INDIVIDUALS AND THEIR SPECIALTIES WITHIN THE COMMUNITY TO SUPPLEMENT
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES.
EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOWN WILL TAKE SUCH ACTION TO MODIFY
OR INITIATE THE PROVISION OF AN ADEQUATE LEVEL OF SERVICES AS APPROPRIATE
BASED UPON FINDINGS.
b. Citizen Awareness
In addition, the level of canmmication by local government
and the level of understanding of its prevailing policies was viewed by
53

the public as unsatisfactory. In order to deal with this identified
development constraint, the following policy and actions were developed.
1THE TOWNDESIRES TOBETTER •• I r DEVELOPMENT
71• PROPERTY • E ESTABLISHD X CITIZENRY.
ACTIONACTION ONE: UPGRADE CHANNELS OF COMMUNICATION THROUGH LOCAL MEDIA.
TWO: IMPROVE .MP•♦ • 171/ •• •D •
BY • 1 • •' •E •71• YEAR TO REVIEW POLICY -RELATED ACTIONS.
ACTIONTHREE: INPUT 5•Yil•URES WITHIN FRAMEWORK
OF I D POLICY DOCUMENTS.
EXPECTED •1ESULTS: THE TIOWNWILL SEEK TO IMPROVE CITIZ1
KNOWLEDGE AND AVMRENESS OF • EFFORTS D ACTIONS.
3. Beach and Waterfront Access
Due to its strategic location along the shores of the Neuse
River, Minnesott Beach is a potential location for public access to the
water. Results of the citizen survey showed a pro -access sentiment (54%)
and survey remarks also indicated a discouragement concerning the lack of
access to the water by local residents.
Steps were taken during the planning process to identify
potential sites and funding arrangements. 'Three existing sites were
identified as available sites for consideration as public beach access
points. The three sites constituted the only vacant property located
along the Neuse River. Two of the sites are under individual ownership
while the third is shoreline part of the Minnesott Beach Country Club
property. Both individual lots are located adjacent to private residences
with limited space for off-street parking. Due to reservations that remain
concerning the local capability to deal with the long-range financial
impact (i.e. maintenance) and potential liability problems, the following
policy was adopted.
54

OW71• •.. '.. ' 711 • ' • M 1M
ACTION ONE: THE TOWN WILL APPROACH PAMLICO COUNTY ABOUT DEVELOPING
A SITE TO SERVE THE NIINNESOTP BEACH-ARAPAHOE AREA.
ACTION TWO: ACTION WILL BE TAKEN BY THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT TO
INVESTIGATE AND IDENTIFY OPTIONAL SITES IN CLOSE PRCKMTY TO THE TOWN.
ACTION THREE: THE TOWN WILL CCNTINUE TO INVESTIGATE POTENTIAL
LONG-TERM FINANCIAL I,= RELATED TO A BEACH ACCESS SITE.
EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOWN WILL PURSUE THE MOST OPTIM[M
SITE FOR PUBLIC BEACH ACCESS ALONG THE NEUSE RIVER.
4. Floating Marina/Development Hanes
The occurrence of citizens using boats as full-time residences
has not been a problem in Minnesott Beach. Such practices have been known
to increase untreated discharge in local waters and concentrate water -related
problems in channels which have limited tidal movement.
The town will continue to monitor such actions in the area of
the local marina but does not feel any policy action is warranted.
The local marina has expanded over the previous planning period
but has limited, additional roan to expand its operation.
In addition, the present zoning classification scheme limits
marine -related development to the existing marina area. Any expansion
impacting local waters is under the jurisdiction of programs identified in
the following section and its policy declaration.
5. Ca[mitment to State and Federal Programs
The Town of Minnesott Beach recognizes the need for state
and federal program assistance in the management of certain environmentally
sensitive areas. The following represents a policy cam fitment to continuing
support within their jurisdiction.
55

�41119611
• •• '• ••;A 1 •V 1 711 1 71 /• M • '.••1
I ••• ••.• 1 ••• Y• • Pl1S 171 ••.•q•• 1 •� 1 •••• •
]i 1 I'J171' `I• • • ]I• II I/ • 11 •• 1 210
�'71:; My,+ :�u ud hiY11�:�M • }. 1• _ •� 74• Yiu
P.04 40(0)�M003MANkiORi�Ia•I��C-h.Fa'�
D. CONPINUIM PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Minnesott Beach recognizes that an open approach to dealing
with public problems is the most responsible way to chart governmental
direction and identify policies to implement it. Throughout the course
of this planning process, the local government has sought public input
and opinions.
A public participation plan was designed and adopted in the
early stages of the process. The plan has been adhered to throughout
the period. The plan stated that public involvement would be generated
through local planning board, citizen surveys, one-on-one discussions,
and eventually public information meetings. In addition, local newspapers
would be used to advertise and promote the workings of the planning process.
Policies related to public information understanding and
awareness are identified in Section 3, Subsection D-2.
In reviewing the public opinion results, several observations
were made with respect to citizen satisfaction. Reaction to public water
service, town streets and trash collection, each appeared to maintain a
moderate to high level of satisfaction.
Fire protection, recreation, rescue service, and medical
service, each indicated a "below average" level of satisfaction. These
services are provided by other governments and the time and travel distance
from Minnesott Beach impacts their level of service.
56

Results concerning emergency preparedness service showed a
lack of knowledge by the respondents. This conclusion will be addressed
in later sections of the document.
Safety or police protection scored low in the results and
was considered a problem which must be addressed in the future.
E. STORM HAZARD MITIGATION, POST DISASTER REOd =, AND EVACUATION PLANS
1. Discussion
The North Carolina coast has been subjected to some notable
hurricanes and northeasters since meterological records have been kept.
These hurricanes have combined wave, wind, and flooding damage throughout
Pamlico County in the past.
Mi.nnesott Beach has not been subjected to a severe hurricane
since its incorporation. With its beneficial topographic features, high
wind velocities pose the greatest threat to the entire ca vanity. Thirty-
nine structures along the Neuse.River shoreline would be subjected to
the erosive effects of the wave action of a storm.
Due to the limited access (Highway 306) to the Town,
highway flooding poses the greatest threat should evacuation of the
town be necessary.
Below are the storm hazards and their potential impact
on Minnesott Beach.
a. Winds
Hurricane winds are those sustained winds of over 73
miles per hair and may reach gust speeds approaching 200 miles per hour.
All properties are essentially subject to wind damage with mobile hares
and older structures being the most susceptible. Due to the town's recent
57

development (84.4% of the hones built between 1970-1980), most of the
residences are considered structurally -sound. The presence of the one
mobile home park could prove•to be a serious problem should damaging
winds occur. Nearly all of the mobile homes are seasonal residences.
b. Flooding
Minnesott Beach would not be subject to extensive flooding
should a hurricane strike. Depending upon the strength of the hurricane
only a small portion of the town is projected to experience flooding
problems (See page 6I). Only three residences are located within the
boundaries of the projected 100 year flood line.* The estimated cumulative
value of these residences is between $90,000 and $140,000. The remainder
of Minnesott Beach is outside of this category and subject only to minimal
flooding.
c. Wave Action (Erosion)
Due to its location along the Neuse River, Minnesott Beach's
estuarine shoreline is subject to storm -related erosion. Shoreline
erosion could lead to loss of property through waterfront erosion and
subsequent undermining of existing structures.
2. Storm Hazard Mitigation Policies
In order to minimize the potential damage caused by the
impact of a hurricane or other major storm, the Town of Minnesott Beach
has adopted certain policies (see page 60)• It is evident that the
majority of actions related to these policies are conducted by other
levels of government and is not within the power of the town government
of Minnesott Beach to provide enforcement. %herever applicable, the
town will utilize its available legal and organizational resources to
deal with problems generated by coastal storms.
*(Ref. Pamlico County Flood Insurance Rate maps).

3. Hurricane Evacuation Plan
One of the most pressing times for intergovernmental
cooperation to cane into play is when it is for the safety of human
lives. Minnesott Beach recognizing that role, has developed policies
(see page g to ensure the most efficient, effective relocation of
its citizens in the event of an amergency.
a. Hurricane Conditions
The following represent the 5 levels of conditions identified
by the Pamlico County Emergency Management office.
Condition 5 - Hurricane Season (June 1 thru December 30)
Condition 4 - Alert - Hurricane Advisory
Condition 3 - Hurricane Watch or approximately 48 hours
to forecasted landfall
Condition 2 - Hurricane Warning or approximately 24 hours
to forecasted landfall
condition 1 - 12 hours or less to forecasted landfall
Re -Entry - Threat removed or damage assessment follows.
b. Hurricane Emergency Actions
Each locality is notified by the Emergency Management
Coordinator that the Emergency Operating Center is being opened when
Condition 4 exists. Support groups from each part of the County are
expected to meet at that office at that tine. Time schedules and
scenarios for each potential occurrence prompted by the storm are
developed. Such planning is based upon individual storm conditions
(i.e. wind strength, direction, speed of movement). Based upon these
determinations, local contact people are mobilized to alert citizens
of the following:
59

1) when to evacuate
2) where to evacuate
3) how to evacuate
4) any other necessary safety information
Two shelters have been identified - Pamlico Technical
College and Fred A. Anderson Warehouse. The former is the location
that citizens of Minnesott Beach would be relocated. This facility
will house approximately 650 people.
c. Re-Entry/Clean-Up
Subsequent to storm damage investigations, the evacuees would
be allowed to return to their residences. This will be based upon the
judgement of the County Erergency Management Coordinator. The town will
enforce Chapter G - Health Protection and Disease Prevention of its
General Ordinances upon the return of its citizens. Through this
enforcement, properties shall be the responsibility of those persons
holding deed to the property in question. Residents will have 15 days
upon notification to comely with the provision of this ordinance.
d. Post Disaster Recovery
The town recognizes the need to adequately respond to
the needs of the citizenry following the impact of a major storm or
hurricane (see page EL). The town, due to its limited resources, will
depend chiefly upon the following:
1. Emergency Preparedness Coordinator
2. County sheriff
3. County Building Inspector
4. Water Department Head
5. Director of Social Services
6. County Tax Supervisor
m

Certain action priorities will be set depending upon the
specific problems generated by the stone. These actions will be consistent
with such policies adopted by the plan. All damage assessments, identifi-
cation of problems, and dissemination of necessary information to property
owners will be coordinated with this group.
e. Tong Term Recovery/Reconstruction
In ca pliance with Article IV, Section 3 of the Minnesott
Beach Zoning Ordinance, the restoration of structures within the town
will be allowed. Non -conforming structures or structures on non -confor-
ming properties will not be permitted to be restored if damage exceeds
75% of the assessed value. Vberever the jurisdiction of state and federal
policies are applicable, representatives from the appropriate agency will
be contacted for a determination.
f. Moratoria Alternative
Due to the confusion and inmediate hardships that a building
moratorium can cause after a natural disaster, the enactment of a building
moratorium is not foreseen. Non -conforming structures or structures on
non -conforming properties will not be permitted to be restored as stated
in Subsection E. Since the Tbwn.is under the jurisdiction of the County
Building Inspection Program, such a decision could be subject to County
action.
The following policies have been adopted to deal with the
local actions associated with hurricane -related evacuation and destruc-
tion.
THE TOWN WILL INSURE THAT ALL ASPECTS OF A HURRICANE EVACUATION
PLAN IMPACTING THEIR CCMPAUDTCTY ARE ADEQUATE.
61'

ACTIN ONE: COOPERATE WITH COUNTY AND STATE OFFICIATE IN REVIEWING
AND EVALUATING CURRENT EVACUATION PLANS.
ACTION 'LWO: WILL ASSIST IN A PUBLIC AWARENESS EFFORT THROUGHOUT
THE COMMUNITY.
ACTIN THREE: WILL WORK WITH PAMLICO COUNTY TO ASSURE THAT ALL
CITIZENS ARE PROPERLY AWARE OF HURRICANE EVACUATION PLANS.
EXPECTED RESULTS: A SAFE AND EFFICIENT EVACUATION AND
RE-ENTRY OF M NNESOTT BEACH IN THE EVENT OF A HURRICANE OR OTHER
NATURAL DISASTER.
1• 01 • .� 1:1 • ' 71• ' ' 1$ • ' ' 21• IT 2 171
ACTION ONE: WORK THROUGH THE COUNTY TO ENSURE THAT ALL PERMITTED
RECONSTRUCTION IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ADOPTED COUNTY BUILDING CODE AND
LOCAL ORDINANCES (I.E. ZONING, HEALTH PROTECTION AND DISEASE PREVENTION).
ACTION TWO: ASSURE THAT ALL RECONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS IN FLOOD
HAZARD AREAS IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM.
EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOWN WILL HAVE APPROPRIATE REDEVELOP-
MENT ACTIONS TAKE PLACE IN THE EVENT OF A HURRICANE OR OTHER NATURAL
DISASTER.
JN

The preceeding policies and actions represent the genuine concerns
and intentions of the Town of Minnesott Beach. The policies dictate
the underlying philosophies of the town government and its constituents,
while the actions delimit the steps of implementation to accomplish such
philosophies.
One gust understand the limitations placed on small tawn governments.
Fran the lack of professionally -trained administration to a limited tax
base, many of the actions outlined for implementation will be dependent
upon volunteers serving on local boards and committees. It is felt the
actions represent reasonable and legitimate steps to ensure that local
issues are dealt with in a satisfactory manner over the planning period.
63

LAND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

S1=ON FOUR: I= CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
The land classification system, which was devised at the
inception of the North Carolina Coastal Management Act, provides a
framework through which the present and future use of land can be
identified for local governments. It also provides some relationship
between the growth patterns desired for each of the counties and
municipalities under the jurisdiction of the Act. It does not act as
a zoning guide (See page 68). As stated:
"a land classification system provides a framework
to be used by local governments to identify the
future use of all lands. The designation of land
classes allows the local government to illustrate
their policy statements as to where and to what
density they want growth to occur, and where they
want to conserve natural and cultural resources
by guiding growth." (7B.0204) (b)
B.
The system provides for five (5) designations of land use
and development patterns. They are: Developed, Transition, Canmmity,
Rural, and Conservation. In general, "Developed" and "Transition" are
classified as the most intense development patterns which presently
require or anticipate the installation of urban services. "Co nmmity"
is established for lower density development patterns not having or
requiring sewer services. Agriculture, forestry, mineral extraction,
or other low intensity uses are classified as "rural." "Conservation"
stands as the classification for the "long-term management and protection
of significant or irreplaceable areas."
C. CATEGORIES
1. Developed
The "developed" class of land use provides for continued
64

intensive developmnt and redevelogresit of existing cities or ninicipa-
lities. Areas to be classified as "developed" include lands developed
essentially for urban purposes or approaching a density of 500 dwellings
per square mile which are provided with usual municipal services,
inclusive of water and sewer service, police and fire protection.
Mimesott Beach does not have any land classified as "developed." Public
opinion, identified in the citizen survey, public input, and existing plans
show no indication that a sewage treatment facility is planned nor feasible
for Minnesott Beach.
2. Transition
The "transition" is the only class that signifies a change
over the planning period. "Transition" land is classified as those lands
providing for future intensive urban development within an area over the
ensuing ten years. Iands that are most suitable and that will accanmdate
necessary public utilities and services are necessary prerequisities of
the designation. The class may also designate areas for additional growth
when additional lands in the developing class are not available or when
they are severely limited for future development.
Lands classified as "transition" may include:
• lands currently having urban services, but lacking
"developed" characteristics.
• lands necessary to acccnucdate the population and
economic growth anticipated within the planning period.
• areas which are, or will be in, a "transition state
of development (i.e. going from a lower intensity
development pattern to a higher* intensity development
pattern, of which will eventually require urban services).
Minnesott Beach presently has two areas that meet the minimum
*exoeeding three residential units per acre
65

"transition" criteria. These areas include the following:
1. 6+ acres bordered by Highway 306, Country Club Drive,
and the Neuse River.
2. 4.35 acres bordered by Neuse River Drive, and the
marina facility.
Both of these areas were designated for multi -family
development in the original land development plan (1974) but were not
zoned as such on the town's zoning map. All areas are now zoned as R-M
(multi -family) that were designated for multi -family residences originally.
The first area has three existing structures with each
structure containing 5 residences. Eleven structures or 55 residences are
planned for the entire site in three phases. An on -site disposal system
is presently serving the structures. The County Sanitarian has given
approval to 2 proposed structures which will also be served by an on -site
system. The six remaining structures will be served by an off -site system
approximately 1/2 mile North along N.C. Highway 306. Final approval is
still pending on this system.
The second site is 4.35 wooded acres which recently was
re -zoned from camercial (C-2) to multi -family residential (R-M).
Preliminary plans call for 12 residences in two 3-story condominiums
which will be primarily marketed to boat owners and retirees. Based upon
these preliminary plans, it is anticipated that the final development will
exceed three residential units per acre. No formal site plans have been
submitted for consideration. The County Sanitarian has approved an off -
site system for the project.
Based upon discussions with the local sanitarian, each site
can support the expected demand due to the existing groundwater levels and
favorable soil characteristics in the Minnesott Beach area. Since
Minnesott Beach is not part of the projected service area of a Countywide
Sewer System and a municipal system does not appear to be feasible in
m

the foreseeable future, these areas will continue to be served by
individual system but will be classified as "transition".
3. Camunity
The "Com¢udty" classification provides for clustered land
uses to meet housing, shopping, employment, and public service needs within
rural areas. It is usually characterized by a small grouping of mixed
land uses which are suitable and appropriate in clusters of rural develop-
ment not reg firing municipal sewer service. "Community" may have water
service and certain other municipal services.
Due to the existing development pattern, Minnesott Beach is
basically classified as "Cm m nity." (See Map/Graphic 7).
The town has reitterated the desire to limit those areas
that higher density (multi -family) development could occur through its
initial development plan, 1980 Iand Use Plan, and the adopted zoning
ordinance. Though the acceptable density of the nulti-family areas
exceed the threshold for a "transition" classification, it does not appear
that further intensification beyond a "co mwnity" classification will occur.
This is based upon the lack of urban -type services projected for the town
and applicable policies set forth by the town.
4. Rural
The "Rural" class provides for agriculture and forest
management, mineral extraction and other low intensity uses aver a
large area. Such lands are identified as appropriate locations for
resource management and allied uses; land with high potential for
agriculture, forestry or mineral extraction; lands with one or more
limitations that would make development costly and hazardous, and,
land containing irreplaceable, limited, or significant natural,
recreational, or scenic resources not otherwise classified.
67

EXISTING ZONING
SCALE
1"- 1000'
TOWN OF
MINNESOTT BEACH
EMR-20RESIDENTIAL
LLJ R-15'RESIDENrIAL
mm C-1 COMMERCIAL
Mc-m COMMERCIAL MARINE
llR-M RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY
SOURCE: U.S. CORPS. OF ENGINEERS
68 PREPARED BY E.C.U. R.D.I.
P.S.P.

No area of Minnesott Beach is classified as "rural" but
the vast majority of the area surrounding Minnesott Beach is classified
as such.
5. Conservation
The final land use category, according to CAMA guidelines,
is the "Conservation" Class, which provides for effective long-term
management of significant, limited, or irreplaceable natural resources.
Also, certain other areas of cultural, recreational, productive, or
scenic value, may also require similar "effective long-term management."
Examples could include major wetlands (other than statutorily defined
coastal wetlands); especially undeveloped shorelines that are unique,
fragile, or hazardous for development; lands that provide necessary
habitat conditions (especially for remnant species; pocosins, or publicly
owned water supply watersheds and aquifers).
The designation "Conservation" does not imply "non-use,"
but does imply a need for careful and cautious management of any permitted
use. Within any lands designated "Conservation," any proposal, or applica-
tion for development actions should be reviewed on a case -by -case basis.
Minnesott Beach has two general areas of "conservation."
(See Map/Graphic 7). Those areas are those previously mentioned as AEC's
(Areas of Environmental Concern) and the golf course (open space) area.
D. POLICIES RELATED TO LAND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
1. ccnm city
The Town does not wish to cxnmit to any new service obliga-
tions. Also, extension or expansion of present service capabilities is
not desired and will not be necessary based upon the implementation of
this plan's policies. No adopted policy reflects any intention by the
r

town to pursue such services that would promote intensive development.
Thus, the town has adopted such policies that would maintain a "cMMMity"
classification and not transcend into a denser development pattern as
identified by a "transition" classification.
2. Transition
All actions and policies related to development density within
Minnesott Beach signify the position of maintaining a predominantly single-
family community with a low density pattern. No policy has been adopted
that would accelerate or expand the development of multi -family residential
areas beyond the present designated areas. Policies concerning limiting
service obligations related to land demands will continue. Such policy
positions will effectively suppress more intensive development pressure
outside the "transition" areas.
3. Conservation
All policies maintain action that would limit development
pressure upon these identified areas.
4. Developed
Classification does not apply to Minnesott Beach and no
indication is seen that it will in the foreseeable future.
5. lh=al
Beach.
This classification does not apply to the Town of Minnesott
70

Mal
MINA
LAND
El
Note: 1
%%v
SOURCE' U.S. CORPS. OF ENGINEERS
i SCALE
PREPARED BY E.C.V. R.O.I.
PS.P.
71

SECTION FIVE
POLICY SYNOPSIS

SECTION FIVE: POLICY SYNOPSIS
The following provides a central location for policy referral
by the local government. This section allows for an identification of all
policies and actions that will be enforced over the planning period.
Throughout the planning process, ideas and suggestions for
alternative action were raised in order to establish discussion and local
reactions. Many of the alternatives are discounted because of a lack of
feasibility or being ill-timed for this calmunity.
It is hoped this section provides a framework for the
planning efforts of the Tom of Minnesott
LISTINGB. 0 ALTERNATIVES
POLICY ONE
1THE TOMDESIRES TO ENSURE THAT FUTURE SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT
(INCLUSIVE OF Ua N COMMERCIAL • 1 ` DOES NOT
SIGNIFICANTLY/• •/4 THE ADJACENT ESTUAR1 WATERS (ABC) OR THE UVERALL
ESTUARINEa
ACTIONONE: :. • • ORDINANCE WITH APP•.OP Y
SEDIMENTCONTROL PIMCAUTICNS.
ACTICNTWO: •R••N I FOR ASSISTANCE IN THEDETERMINATION
OF •CAL SEDIMENT M• a E AND ACCEPTABLE REPLENISHMENTALTERNATIVES.
ACTIONPat • • • CHANGES WHICH M INCONSISTE
(NORTH• 1 r• ADKINISTTATIVE ••• • la• IN ORDER NOTTo
PERMIT DFIR]]MENTAL LAND USES ADJACENT T• ESTUARINE WATERS.
ACTION•UR: SEEK PROITECTION AGAINST THEDESTRUCTION OR WEAK=G
OF 1• Ial• AGAINST EROSION.
ACTIONSUPPORT1 ENFCRCEV1ENT OF
• I• REGULATIONS GOVERNINGDEVELOPMENT` MAPACTING THEP • 1 E SHORE-
T. AND ESIUARINE WA=.
EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOWN1 1 1 SHORELINE ERO V
PRCBL04S WITHOUTADVERSELY IMPACTING TH1 • • a lal •; E OF
ENVIRCNMENMAL CONCERN (•a
arMAT11ES: - ALUM RESIDENTIALDEVELOPMENTS (SU: • r TO
ELAN THEIR DESIGN WITH ONLY APPLICABLE
REGULATIONS
FOR •
NOT •R• CH STATE AGENCIES • • OFFICES CONCERNING
BEACH REPLENISHMENT NaE
ALLOWnmivmmL PROPERTY OWNERS io SEEK ti • • a, 1 I
REPLENISHYM APPROACHES TO THEIR PROPERTY.
72

POLICY TWO
1THE TOM/ CONTINUE TO UPGRADE IWALROADS1• • G
REVENUESOURCES.
C
ACTION• 1 I DI / AND PRIORIITZE I=ROAD NEMS TO BE
ACTIONADDRESSED THR(X]GH
LE I= AND STATE FUNDS.
• • PERMIT •OPERATING OF MD D11 MOTOR VEHICLES
ACTIONOFF OF PUBLIC ROADS EXCEPT FOR OWNER OF PROPERTY.
THREE: 'A • '.• . DI' ROAD DESIGN MES THROUG
SUB-
DIVISION R 1 /• C
EKPECTED I;ESULTS: THE TOM WILL MAINTAIN AN ADEQUATE MUNICIPAL
ROAD SYSTEM.
ALTERNATIVES: - ALWK AMONS WHICH WOULD DAMAGE ROADWAYS AND
SHOULDERS.
- NOT DEVELCP APPROPRIATE ROADWAY DESIGN GUIDELINEff
THROUGH PROPOSED SUBDIVISION 0RDIlWiCE.
UPGRADE ROADS TO STATE STANDARDSD SEEK
SYSTEM MAINTENANCE.
.• K. Wlp
1 •rye h-.� `'• •71•.�1 FS�D / iDlr••�101 MD. 1•I • •Dell•• •
I• • • •M DI• el• • 1 DI' • • r /
• DI' I • • /• DI• 1 I • • 1 DI-
Y •' E: MAINTAIN PRESENTD DENSITIES WH1 • / ENCOURAGE
BASEDTHE CCNTnMTION OF CONVENTIONAL, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL D
••' • : •
•' • CONTINUE •SUPPORT1 D 1 • •AID IDI • • /
STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT REGULATIONS CONCERNING INDIVIDUAL SEPTIC TANK
LATE
ACTION THREE: WILL DEVELOP SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE WITH APPROPRIATE
DRAINAGE GUIDELINES, 1 rSTANDARDS,D : DI• •D• 9Dt
•r• :1 ••` • •• 1 • D I RC • •' • •• 1 C 1 1POTENTIAL SHORELINE EROSION.
EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOM WILL ENSURE THE MAINTENANCE OF
FRAGILE LAND AREAS AND WATER QUALITY IMPACTED BY THEIR JURISDICTION
THROUGH AVAILABLE LAND MANAGEMENT TOOTS (I.E. ZONING, SUBDIVISION).
73

POLICY FOUR
THE TOWN RECOGNIZES THE ENVIRONMENTAL VALUE OF COASTAL WETLANDS
(AEC) AND DESIRES TO PROTECT THEM FROM SIGNIFICANT DAMAGE.
ACTION ONE: MAINTAIN DESIGNATION OF WETLANDS WITHIN THE LOCAL
ZONING ORDINANCE.
ACTIN TWO: DISALLOW ANY LAND USE DESIGNATIONS THAT ARE INOON-
SISTFN'T WITH 15 NCAC 7H, (NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE). (EXAMPLES
ARE UTILITY EASEMM, FISHING PIERS, DOCKS, AGRICULTURAL USES, AND/OR
DRAINAGE USES).
EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOWN WILL INSURE THE PROTECTION OF
COASTAL MARSHES AS DEFINED BY THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL RESOURCES
COMMISSION.
ALTERNATIVES: ELIMINATE "WETTANDS" DESIGNATION WITHIN
ADOPTED ZONING ORDINANCE.
POLICY FIVE
THE TOWN WILL NOT RESTRICT THE PUBLIC'S RIGHT TO NAVIGATION IN
PUBLIC TRUST AREAS (AEC) TO PERPETUATE THEIR BIOLOGICAL VALUE.
ACTIN ONE: DISALLOW ANY LAND USE DESIGNATIONS ADJACENT TO PUBLIC
TRUST AREAS THAT ARE INCONSISTENT WITH 15 NCAC 7H (NORTH CAROLINA
AUM4INISTRATIVE CODE).
ACTION TWO: PROVIDE APPROPRIATE STANDARDS WITHIN THE LOCAL CONTROL
ORDINANCES (ZONING AND SUBDIVISION) FOR THOSE ACCEPTABLE LAND USE
DESIGNATIONS.
EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOWN WILL INSURE THE PROTECTION OF
PUBLIC TRUST AREAS AS DEFINED BY THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL RESOURCES
COMMISSION.
ALTERNATIVES:DISREGARD THE TOWN'S IMPACT UPON ADJACENT
PUBLIC TRUST WATERS.
POLICY SIX
THE TOWN WILL ENACT A SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AND CONTINUING TO ENFORCE
A LOCAL ZONING ORDINANCE, EACH HELPING TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF LOCAL ENVIFaZl NTAL FEATURES, THE ACCEPTA-
BLE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
ACTION ONE: ESTABLISH PROCESS FOR THE REVIEW OF ALL PLATS AND/OR
PROSPECTIVE DEVELOPMENT PLANS.
ACTION TWO: ENFORCE ACCEPTABLE LOT, STREET, DENSITY, AND AMENITY DESIGN
STANDARDS.
ACTION THREE: LIMIT MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
ACTION FOUR: PROVIDE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES AND T. IITATION OF
STORMWATER RUNOFF THROUGH THE ENCOURAGEMENT OF THE RETENTION OF VEGETATION,
PRESERVATION OF OPEN -SPACE, AND MEM M DISTURBANCE OF THE NATURAL TERRAIN
AS CONSISTENT WITH THE POLICY ACTIONS SPELLED OUT IN THE LAND USE PLAN.
74

EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOWN WILL ESTABLISH A SUBDIVISION
ORDINANCE WHICH WILL GUIDE ANY FUTURE SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT OR
REPLATTING OF EXISTING SUBDIVISIONS.
- NOT ENACT A LOCAL SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE.
- NOT IINCLUDE PROTECTIVE CONSIDERATION FOR
VEGETATION, OPEN SPACE, AND NATURAL TERRAIN.
POLICY SEVEN
THE TOM DESIRES TO ESTABLISH BETTER COMMUNICATION WITH DEVELOPMENT
INTERESTS, PROPERTY OWNERS, AND EXISTING CITIZENRY.
ACTION ONE: UPGRADE CHANNELS OF COMMUNICATION THROUGH LOCAL MEDIA.
ACTION TWO: IMPROVE PUBLIC EXPOS[R2E OF ESTABLISHED POLICY DECISIONS.
ACTION THREE: ESTABLISH PUBLIC INPUT PROCEDURES WITHIN FRAMEWORK
OF ALL PLANNING APED POLICY DOCUIENTS.
EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOM WILL SEEK TO IMPROVE CITIZEN
KNOWLEDGE APED AWARENESS OF LOCAL EFFORTS AND ACTIONS.
ALTERNATIVES: - MAINTAIN SAME PUBLIC C04PIUNICATION CHANNELS.
- NO ACTION.
POLICY EIGHT
THE TOWN WILL CONTINUE TO ENFORCE THE ADOPTS ZONING ORDINANCE AND
ITS IN ,Tr INCLUSIVE OF DENSITY, SETBACKS, AND CONSERVATION AREAS.
ACTION ONE: MAINTAIN Il-W-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS
BASED UPON SOIL T. TATIONS.
ACTION TWO: REVIEW DEVELOPMENT OF ADDITIONAL MULTI -FAMILY HOUSING
UNITS (I.E. CONDOMINIUMS, APARIIYJEN'TS, ETC.) WITHIN PRESENT R-M DISTRICT.
ACTIN THREE: LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF COMMEI L LAND USE DESIGNATION
WITHIN THE TOWN.
ACTION FOUR: MAINTAIN THOSE AREAS DESIGNATED IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE
AS AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN IINCLUSIVE OF COASTAL WETLANDS, ESTUARINE
SHORELINES, AND PUBLIC TRUST AREAS WITH ALL PERMITTED LAND USES BEING
CONSISTENT WITH 15 NCAC 7H (NORTH CAROLINA AMMSTRATIVE CODE).
75

POLICY NINE
ACTIONONE: WILL 1 1 DESIGNATED CU44ERCIAL AREA AS DESIGNAM
BY THE ADOPTED ZONING MAP.
ACTION TWO: KkMAIN APPROPRIATE STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPlvj
WITH ADOPTED ZONING ORDINANCE.
ACTION THREE: WILL SEEK WAYS TO ATTRACT COMMERCIAL SERVICES AS
NEEDED BY THE CITIZENRY.
ACTION FOUR: WILL WORK AS NEEDED BY THE CITIZENRY WITH COUNTY TO
ENFORCE APPLICABLE BUILDING CODE REGULATIONS.
EXPECTED RESULTS: THE CONTINUATION OF A LDUTED COMMERCIAL
AREA WITH A GRADUAL UPGRADINGOF ]I • r AND
ALTERNATIVES: - LIMIT COMMERCIAL DISTRICT DESIGNATION.
- ADOPT LOCALLY ENFORCED BUILDING CODES.
r •'iiiiwiMi
THE TOWN WILL INVESTIGATE CERTAIN OPERATIONAL CHANGES INCLUSIVE
OF COMBINATION OF SERVICES WITH OTHER LOCAL GOVERNMENTS. IN ADDITION,
THE TOWN WILL IDENTIFY LOCAL FUNDS IN ORDER TO 24PIEMENT CERTAIN SYSTEMS
THAT WILL AUQvJENT THE PRESENT LEVEL OF SERVICE.
,•=ION • 1 EXAMINE ] I • •.r] E AND PROTE)MON ALTERNATIVES
INCLUSIVE OF • I /` CH APPROACH.
• TWO: ]umEumm FIRE sERvrcEEQuumENT cAPABiLi=/
RESPONSE1 E WITHIN LOCAL•• D ESTABLISH CHANGES WHE ]r
ACTIONTHREE: CCMPARE PRO JECTED LOCAL COST OF :1• r
ACTIONNEARBY COMMUNITIES AND SIMILAR SIZE CCMMUNITIES.
• IDENTIFYD PROVIDE ••• ]• LIST OF 1
INDIVIDUALS ANI• THEIR SPECIALTIESU 1 CCwjNITy To SUPPLEMENT
7AEFGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES.
EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOWN WILL TAKE SUCH ACTIN TO MODIFY
OR INITIATE THE PROVISION OF AN ADEQUATE LEVEL OF SERVICES AS APPROPRIATE
BASED UPON FINDINGS.
ALTERNATIVES: - NO ACTION.
POLICY ELEVEN
THE TOWN WILL SEEK ALTERNATIVES IN OBTAINING AND IMPROVING
WATERFRONT PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC BEACH ACCESS.
ACTION ONE: THE TOWN WILL APPROACH PAMLICO COUNTY ABOUT DEVELOPING
A SITE TO SERVE THE MIIZmsolT BEACH-ARAPAHOE AREA.
ACTION TWO: ACTION WILL BE TAKEN BY THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT TO
INVESTIGATE AND IDENTIFY OPTIONAL SITES IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE TOWN.
ACTION THREE: THE TOM WILL CONTINUE TO INVESTIGATE POTENTIAL.
IONG-T'ERM FINANCIAL CONY7MUM RELATED TO A BEACH ACCESS SITE.
76

EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOWN WILL PURSUE THE MOST OPTn4LP4
SITE FOR PUBLIC BEACH ACCESS ALONG THE NEUSE RIVER.
- PURSUE THE POTENTIAL L1OCATION OF A LOCAL
BEACH ACCESS SITE.
- SEEK LOCAL FUNDING FOR DEVELOPMENT COSTS.
POLICY TWELVE
THE TOWN WILL ENSURE THAT ALL ASPECTS OF A HURRICANE EVACUATION
PLAN IMPACTING THEIR COMMUNITY ARE ADEQUATE.
ACTION ONE: COOPERATE WITH COUNTY AND STATE OFFICIALS IN REVIEWING
AND EVAT,f7ATIIdG CURRENT EVACUATION PLANS.
ACTION TWO: WILL ASSIST IN A PUBLIC AS RENESS EFFORT THROUGHOUT
THE COMMUNITY.
ACTION THREE: WILL WORK WITH PAMLICO COUNTY TO ASSURE THAT ALL
CITIZENS ARE PROPERLY AWARE OF HURRICANE EVACUATION PLANS.
EXPECTED RESULTS: A SAFE AND EFFICIENT EVACUATION OF
MINNFSOTT BEACH IN THE EVENT OF A HURRICANE OR OTHER NATURAL DISASTER.
ALTERNATIVES: - NO LEGITIMATE ALTERNATIVE.
l0w 0111021av1
THE TOWN WILL IDENTIFY A STEERING COMMITTEE TO GUIDE ALL POST -
HURRICANE CLEAN-UP AND DEVELOPMENT, UTILITY REPAIR AND/OR REPLACEMENT,
SUBSEQUENT TO THE APPOINTMENT OF A COUNTY TASK FORCE.
ACTION ONE: WORK THROUGH THE COUNTY TO INSURE THAT ALL RECONSTRUCT
IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ADOPTED COUNTY BUILDING CODE AND LOCAL ORDINANCES.
ACTION TWO: ASSURE THAT ALL RECONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS IN FLOOD
HAZARD AREAS IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM.
EXPECTED RESULTS: THE TOWN WILL HAVE APPROPRIATE DEVELOP-
MENT ACTIONS TAKE PLACE IN THE EVENT OF A HURRICANE OR OTHER NATURAL
DISASTER.
ALTERNATIVES: - NO ACTION.
lQ*jA(W0:j*j9jt4V2l2lkN
THE TOWN DOES NOT DESIRE TO PRATE AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY, MINING,
FISHERIES, INDUSTRY (LIGHT OR HEAVY), ENERGY FACILITIES, OR THE IOCATION
OF ANY MAJOR FACILITY IN OR IN CLOSE PROM= TO THE COMMUNITY.
ACTION ONE: WILL ENFORCE ALL STATE, FEDERAL, AND LOCAL REGULATIONS
RELATED TO THE OPERATION OR PLACE ENT OF THE AFOREMENTIONED ACTIVITIES.
ACTION TWO: WILL NOT EXTEND SUCH SERVICES AS TO PROMOTE SUCH LAND
USES OR FACILITIES.
77

EXPECTED RESULTS: NO ACTIONS TO PROMOTE THE LOCATION OF
THE MENTIONED FACILITIES OR ACTIVITIES WILL BE UNDERTAKEN BY THE TOWN.
ALTERNATIVES: — CHANGE THE RESIDENTIAL NATURE OF THE
MUNICIPALITY.
— NO EXPRESSION OF OPPOSITION.
POLICY FIFTEEN
1 •L ••• 1 •• r• •!f7 i� •,•tl•• 1 •••• •
y ra �• • r • u n r• •: a •• a •
• • �• • • u •i • • a
ACTION: NO ACTION NECESSARY.
POLICY SIXTEEN
BEFORE ANY LAND ALTERATION TAKES PLACE IN THE ASA SITE, APPROPRIATE
STATE OFFICIALS WILL, BE NOTIFIED.
ACTIN ONE: THE NILNNESOTT BEACH PLANNING BOARD WILL MONITOR FUTURE
LAND DEVELOPMENT CHANGES IN THE SPECIFIED SITE.
in

TOWN OF MINNESOTT BEACH
LAND USE PLAN
Citizen Survey
I. PERSONAL
NOTE: Please check the following answers as they apply to you or your family:
I. Which of the following best describes your residence status?
a. Full-time Resident
b. Seasonal Resident
C. Non-resident Property Owner
2. If you are either a full-time or seasonal resident, how long have you resided or had a residence in Min-
nesott Beach?
a. more than 10 years
b. 5-10 years
C. 1-5 years
d. less than 1 year
3. If you are either a seasonal resident or non-resident property owner, do you plan to move to Minnesott
Beach on a permanent basis within the following time frames?
a. 1 year
b. 1-3 years
C. 3-5 years
d. do not plan to move there or unsure
4. Please indicate the humber of persons in your household who fit in each age category:
a. 0.5 years
b. 6-17 years
C. 18-25 years
d. 26-35 year
e. 36-45 years
f. 46-55 years
g. 56-65 years
h. over 65 years
5. Which of the following best describes the head of household's employment status?
a. full-time employed
b. part-time employed
C. unemployed
d. retired
6. Which of the following best corresponds with your household's total income?
a. below $10,000
b. $10,001 to $20,000
C. $20,001 to $30,000
d. $30,001 to $40,000
e. $40,001 to $50,000
f. above $50,000

Il. GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT CONCERNS
NOTE: Please circle the word or phrase with which you agree.
7. Minnesott Beach has grown at a (TOO RAPID, ACCEPTABLE, TOO SLOW, NO OPINION) rate over
the past five years.
8. Minnesott Beach has handled its growth over the past five years in an (ACCEPTABLE, UNACCEPTABLE,
NO OPINION) manner.
9. I (AGREE, DISAGREE, NO OPINION) that Minnesott Beach should construct a public sanitary
sewerage system.
10. The present types of local regulatory control over growth and development are (TOO STRICT,
ACCEPTABLE, TOO LENIENT, NO OPINION).
11. Please rank in order 1 through 5 the following types of development (I being most preferred, and 5
. being least preferred):
a. apartments
b. condominiums
c. single-family homes
I11. LEVEL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN
d. mobile homes
e. commercial establishments
NOTE: Please circle the letter which best represents your level of concern with the following:
12. The quality of water of the Neuse River:
a. very concerned b. concerned c. not concerned d. no opinion
13. The quality of water of Alligator Gut (Marina):
a. very concerned b. concerned c. not concerned d. no opinion
14. The preservation of wetlands in the area:
a. very concerned b. concerned c. not concerned d. no opinion
15. The environmental impact of individual septic systems:
a. very concerned b. concerned c. not concerned d. no opinion
16. Coastal environmental problems in general:
a. very concerned b. concerned c. not concerned d. no opinion

IV. GENERAL POLICIES
NOTE: Please circle the response which best describes your feelings.
17. The Town of Minnesott Beach should exercise more regulatory control over the growth of the town.
STRONGLY AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY DISAGREE
18. The State of North Carolina should provide increased direction over development along the coast of
North Carolina.
STRONGLY AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY DISAGREE
19. The State of North Carolina should provide increased direction over development along the Neuse
. River.
STRONGLY AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY DISAGREE
20. More policies concerning growth and development of Minnesott Beach are needed to guide its
future.
STRONGLY AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY DISAGREE
21. The present policies of the Town are working well in guiding its future.
STRONGLY AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY DISAGREE
22. The Town should try to obtain land for public beach access.
STRONGLY AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY DISAGREE
23. The Town should allow development of condominiums in the area from the ferry dock to the existing
pier.
STRONGLY AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE . STRONGLY DISAGREE
24. The intent of the Town's policies is understood by the general population.
STRONGLY AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY DISAGREE

V. PUBLIC SERVICE
NOTE: Please rate the adequacy of the
following services to
the best of your
knowledge (circle your response).
25. Public water system
A. EXCELLENT B. GOOD
C. AVERAGE
F. POOR
O. NO OPINION
26. Septic System
A. EXCELLENT B. GOOD
C. AVERAGE
F. POOR
O. NO OPINION
27. Town Streets
A. EXCELLENT B. GOOD
C. AVERAGE
F. POOR
O. NO OPINION
28. Drainage
A. EXCELLENT B. GOOD
C. AVERAGE
F. POOR
O. NO OPINION
29: Trash Collection
A. EXCELLENT B. GOOD
C. AVERAGE
F. POOR
O. NO OPINION
30. Recreation
A. EXCELLENT B. GOOD
C. AVERAGE
F. POOR
O. NO OPINION
31. Town Government
A. EXCELLENT B. GOOD
C. AVERAGE
F. POOR
O. NO OPINION
32. Fire Protection
A. EXCELLENT B. GOOD
C. AVERAGE
F. POOR
O. NO OPINION
33. Safety (Police) Protection
A. EXCELLENT B. GOOD
C. AVERAGE
F. POOR
O. NO OPINION
34. Emergency Preparedness
A. EXCELLENT B. GOOD
C. AVERAGE
F. POOR
O. NO OPINION
35. Street Lighting
A. EXCELLENT B. GOOD
C. AVERAGE
F. POOR
O. NO OPINION
36. Rescue/Ambulance Services
A. EXCELLENT B. GOOD
C. AVERAGE
F. POOR
O. NO OPINION
37. Medical Services
A. EXCELLENT B. GOOD
C. AVERAGE
F. POOR
O. NO OPINION
38. Education
A. EXCELLENT B. GOOD
C. AVERAGE
F. POOR
O. NO OPINION

VI. GENERAL ATTITUDE
NOTE: These topics were noted in your previous land development plan.
Please express your feelings about the subjects as they relate to Minnesott Beach.
39. Type of waterfront development:
40. General appearance of
41. Annexation of additional properties:
42. Increased tourism:
43. Increasing taxes for needed services:
44. Seasonal resident(s) needs:
45. Permanent resident(s)
46. Non-resident(s) property owner needs:
Thank you for your time, effort, and assistance in this important process.
PREPARED BY: East Carolina University
Regional Development Institute
Willis Building
Greenville, NC 27834-4353

£9£6-i'£8LZ eu1107eD WON 'alllnuaaJO
8u1Pling silliM
alcyysul tuautdolanaQ IeuolBa-d ,yis�aniufl euT1o:eJ 3seg
aiaH
durn�S
a�eld
:ol umlag
(71VNI O.L mrdH (nat)
(FOLD HERE TO MAIL)
MAILING INSTRUCTIONS FOR CMZEN SURVEY:
After completing the survey, fold where indicated, staple and return.
Dear Citizen,
February 1986
The purpose of this survey is to determine the needs and attitudes concerning land use in the Town of
Minnesott Beach. Your response will be used to assist in the planning decisions and recommendations incor-
porated in the Town's Land Use Plan which is being prepared.
Funds for the development of this survey are through the Department of Coastal Management, State of
North Carolina. Your assistance and cooperation is a valuable contribution and is appreciated. Please fold and
return by mail or leave at the Minnesott Beach Town Hall during regular business hours. Please complete and
return prior to March 12, 1986.
Sincerely yours,
Town of Minnesott Beach