CAMA Sketch Level Land Use Plan Update 1987-1988

DCM COPY DCM COPY
lease do not remove!!!!!
Division of Coastal Management
TOWN OF MESIC
CAMA SKETCH LEVEL
LAND USE PLAN UPDATE
1987

TOWN OF MESIC
Leroy Credle,
William E. Credle,
Chairman
Councilman
B.H. Jones,
James E. Cooper,
2nd Vice Chairman
Councilman
Holland Gibbs
Edward Credle,
Coucilman
Mayor
Principal Planner Planner
Lenwvod V. Long Pickett Thanas, Jr.
' The preparation of this document Was financed in part through a grant provided
by the North Carolina Coastal Management Program, through funds provided by
' the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, administered by the
' Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration.
Adopted by Town Council Nay 23, 1988
Adopted by Coastal Resource Commission May 27, 1988

Table of Contents
Subject Page
I. Introduction 1
II. Data Collection and Analysis 4
III. Present Condition 7
IV.
Existing Land
Use
9
V.
Constraints:
Land Suitability
10
VI.
Constraints:
Community Facilities
11
VII. Fragile Areas 12
VIII. Future Trends 15
IX. Land Classification 16
X. Current Plans, Policies and Regulations 18
XI. Resource Protection Policies 21
XII. Resource Production and Management Policies 26

Subject
XIII. Economic and Community Development Policies
XIV. Hurricane Mitigation Reconstruction and Evacuation
27
`i7
XV. Continuing Public Participation Policies 30

4l4:•• �_ yV SU
The Coastal Area Management Act of 1974 represents the most
comprehensive land use management and control passed to date by the North
Carolina General Assembly. Core to its intent was the protection and
regulation of the state's most precious and fragile natural coastal
resources. Most important, however, the Act established a cooperative
initiative to manage the coastal areas between affected local
governments. In addition to the Act requiring the development and
adoption of a Land Use Plan by the twenty counties in the coastal area,
consistent with state guidelines, each plan must be updated every five
years.
The Town of Mesic in 1981 developed and adopted a Land Use Plan to
protect, control and regulate development within its boundaries. The
purpose(s) of the Plan as stated was to provide an assessment of the
town's environmental resources and to establish a framework for the
initiation of programs and projects to protect and develop those
resources for the use and enhancement of the town, county, state and
nation..
Additionally, the 1981 Plan stated several goals which conformed with
the guidelines of the Act. A summary of the goals specified are as
follows:
(a) To ensure that the development or preservation
of the land and water resources of the coastal
area within the town is in accordance with
the articulated needs of citizens and the
capacity of the land and water for development
and use or the need for preservation.

-2 -
I
I
1
I
1
1
1
1
(b) To establish policies, guidelines and
standards for the conservation of resources;
the economic development of the coastal area;
the use and development of recreational lands,
water and tourist facilities; the development
of roads, streets and transportation and
circulation patterns; and the protection of
common law and public rights is the lands and
waters of the coastal areas.
The 1981 Land Use Plan prepared by the town addressed specific
policies developed in the area of resource protection, resource
production, and economic and community development. These policies
represented an effort by town officials to protect, preserve, and
enhance the coastal area within the town's jurisdiction. A summary of
the implementation strategies of these policies are as follows:
Policies
I. Resource Protection
1. Coastal Wetland, Estuarine
Water, Public Trust Areas,
Estaurine Shorelines
2. ocean Hazard and Public Waters
Categories
3. Natural Hazard Areas -
a. Excessive Erosion
Status
The town recognized the
need to coordinate these
activities with county,
state and federal agencies.
As such, implementation was
deferred to the authority in -
invested with these agencies..
These categories do not exist
within the town.
The town has monitored all
development in the town. Pro-
perty owners participating in the
town's FY083 CDBG Program were
required to enroll in the National
Flood Insurance program prior to
the approval of any repair work.

-3-
11
1
1
1
C
11
1
1
b. Soils
4. Hazardous/Fragile Land Areas
a. water Supply Sources
5. Hurricane and Flood Plain
Evacuation -
II. Resource Production
1. Recreation
2. Productive Agriculture Lands
3. Forestry
4. Commercial Fishing
5. Off -Road Vehicle
III. Economic and Community Development
1. Industrial Development
2. Redevelopment of Developed
Areas
All proposed development
activities are coordinated with
the county health agency.
The Council has commented as
needed in plans relating to this
critical area.
The town officials are included
in the County's Hurricane Plan
and fully participate in all
preparedness activities.
The town continues its support of
the county's recreational program
and has coordinated local recrea-
tional activities with other
agencies.
The town planning board remains
active and will continue to
monitor development occurring
in this area.
Town officials closely watch all
clearance activities in this area
but there is no formal procedure
to ensure conformance.
The town will continue support of
county enforcement in this policy
area.
The town did not have a policy in
this area nor has there been any
discussion to establish a policy.
Although remaining fully
supportive of economic develop-
ment, there has not been any
proposed ventures presented to
the town council.
The town has implemented a CDBG
program involving the rehabilita-
tion and removal of blighted
dwellings.
1

II
-4-
3. Tourism, Beach and Waterfront
Access
4. Assistance to Channel Mainte-
nance and Beach Nourishment,
Energy and Facility Siting and
Development
There has been no active program
established, nor has either of
these areas impacted the town.
The town remain supportive of
policies in these areas.
The town supports state and
federal efforts in this area.
While the goals of the town's 1987 up date will remain the same,
there will however, be a discussion of new issues which have surfaced
since the 1981 update. Addressing these new issues will ensure that
the town remains in a firm position to manage, protect and preserve
not only the resources and development within the area but the
property and lives of its citizens as well.
II. Data Collection and Analysis
A number of sources and reports were used in collecting data
relative to the Town of Mesic. Due to the size of Mesic, as is
expected, data is quite limited and sparsed. The primary data source
used is the 1980 Census which was incomplete at the time of the 1981
Plan.. A 1984 Public Transportation Improvement Study for the town
also provided useful and meaningful information.
It is noted, however, that the population of Mesic has been
stable and there has been no major deviation or Land Use changes.
Based upon these factors, projected trends and population growth
should provide an accurate description of the future development
pattern likely to take place within the town over the next five to ten
years.
Population
The Town of Mesic is a rural community located in the eastern
section of Pamlico County. The population of the town has remained

-5-
relatively stable over the past ten years. It is noted that the
town's population increased from 369 in 1970 to 400 in 1980. Although
experiencing only a slight increase of 88 during the period, it does
suggest that the town is not suffering from a rapid lost of its
population.
As Table I shows, the growth for the town has been relatively
akin to the increases for the county and slightly above that of
township three (3) in which it is located.
TABLE I
Locality
Population Growth
Percent Change
Projected
1970 1980
1990
Mesic
369 400
8.4%
N/A
Township #3
2,886 2,992
3.7%
N/A
Pamlico Co.
9,467 10,339
9.8%
11,889
Source: N.C. office of Budget and Management
The ethnic characteristics of the town basically remains the same
with very little change. Approximately 72% of the town's population
is Black and 28% is White. This is contrasted with approximately
31.5% of the county's population being Black and 68.5% white. Table
II gives an overview of the ethnic composition in the area.

Ethnic Characteristics
White Black
Mesic
Township #3
Pamlico County
North Carolina
Source: 1980 U.S. Census of Population
As evidenced by Table II, the town has a high percentage of
Blacks as compared to other areas. This in some way contributes to
the neglect and disadvantage factors that impede development within
the town. This development is not only limited to the physical
resources within the town but to its human resources as well.
It is significant to note that based on 1980 Census data, the
town's percentage of elderly was not as high as generally expected.
only 12.8% of the town's population is 60 and over. However, the age
group 35-59 constitute 30% of the town's population. It is further
noted that 30% of the population are within the 0-17 age group. Table
III provides a summary of the age groups within the town.

-7-
Age
7ABIE III
TOWN OF MFSIC
Age Distribution of Population
Number
Percent
0-5
36
9.0%
6-15
64
16.0%
16-17
23
5.8%
18-34
105
26.3%
35-59
121
30.3%
60+
51
12.8%
Source: 1980 U.S. Census of Population
Briefly, according to Census Data and a 1983 Household Survey, a
high percentage of residents work outside of the county. Also, 61% of
employed persons drove 30 minutes or more to work. This is an
indication of the lack of employment opportunities within the county
and area.
III. Present Condition
Mesic as noted, has a stable population and has not experienced a
rapid lost in population. It is be expected that due to the lack of
employment opportunities there would be a loss of its young citizens.
As employment opportunities are increased in the county and

or-=
surrounding counties it is likely that Mesic will retain a high
percentage of its productive youth who decides to enter the work
force. There will also be a lost of some of the town's productive
young population due to the lack of diverse employment opportunities
within the area.
Due to its location and lack of housing, the town does not
experience any seasonal population. Also, the lack of adequate
community facilities does not allow for any economic development of
large scale.
Although, the town through a State Community Development Block
Grant has repaired a substantial number of houses, there still remain
a significant number of houses which are in need of repair. Due to
the large number of families who lack adequate financial resources,
to make needed repairs, the town will again seek state and federal
assistance.
Economic Development is badly neeed in the area. However, unless
it is related to the seafood or agriculture industry, such development
is very unlikely to occur within the next five years.
There remains a large amount of agriculture and forest land in
the town. There appear to be a trend toward increased use of forest
timber. Thus, timber production is becoming another source of
economic stimulation for the area. The issue of benefit to area
residents remains unknown in terms of employment directly or
indirectly.
In summary, the town has resources that are vital and important
to the overall growth of the county. However, the area is void of an

mm
economic development base and is lacking basic community facilities
to support needed development. Additionally, housing needs of the
area are critical and demand attention. Also, as cited in a
1984 transportation study, there remains a need for improved
transportation. This is especially critical for the town's elderly
and unemployed. Mesic as a rural community has improved over the past
five years and the livability for its citizens has been greatly
enhanced. There still remain much to be done; however, town citizens
and elected officials are diligently working together to make needed
improvements. Additionally, intergovernmental coordination with the
county and other localities have greatly increased the opportunities
for change and improvements.
IV. Existing Land Use
• As was indicated in the 1981 Land Use Plan, the town is mostly
rural and predominate land uses in the areas are residential,
agriculture and forest and woodlands. It is obvious that these areas
are predominate as is evidenced by the high percentage of land use as
compared to other areas.
Currently there are no major identifiable Land Use compatibility
problems beyond the septic tanks problem which are attributed to poor
soil conditions. This problem will be greatly reduced by the planned
sewer system. The town is included in the Bay River Metropolitan
Sewage District.
Identifiable areas of environmental concern within the town
remain as specified in the 1981 plan. Areas specified were:
estuarine waters, coastal wetlands, public trust areas and estuarine
shorelines. Existing land uses within AEC's remain generally

- 10 -
compatible with the development criteria of the Coastal Resources
Commission. There are no existing major uses which directly conflict
with the intent of AEC current uses including those normally permitted
through AEC criteria.
TABLE IV
Existing Land Use
Land Use Acres
Percent
Residential
150
28.2
Commercial & Industrial
45
8.4
Marsh & Wetlands
35
6.6
Forestry & Undeveloped Land
142
26.7
Government & Institutional
10
1.9
Agriculture
150
28.2
Land
142
26.7
Total
532
100%
V. Constraints: Land Suitability As was specified in the
previous Land Use Plan, there are no man-made hazards in the town.
However, Mesic is in the vicinity of the air lanes utilized by the
U.S. Marine Corps Air Section in its bombing of Brant Island. Mesic
continues to support the county's opposition to and concern for the
hazard created by this bombing target area.

II
I.1
1
1
1
®aa;;
E�
<nnr:
LEG END
Residential
Commercial and
Industrial
Wetlands
Forest and
Woodlands
Water
Government and
Institutional
Undeveloped
Agriculture
��,tti'rtE
The preparation of this document was financed in part through a
grant provided by the North Carolina Coastal Management Program,
through funds provided by the Coastal Zone Management Act of
1972, as amended, administered by the Office of Ocean and Coastal
Resource Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration.
Existing Land Use 1987
Town of MESIC
Pamlico County, North Carolina
A
K4\ � ��f•
To" Lkdit
'Ye
PLUM
CREEK
To" U im / ••./
Town Limits
NOTE. Town does not exercise
any planning beyond its bound-
aries. No Extra/Territorial
planning.

I
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
The two major categories of natural hazards addressed in the
town's 1981 Land use Plan continue to be of grave concern. Excessive
erosion and flooding are still issues demanding attention. Soil
conditions greatly limits the type and density of development in the
town. The lack of sufficient slope was identified as the major
problem in the town. The relief of 0-2 is typical in the area and
results in poor drainage which makes the town susceptible to flooding.
The town is classified as Zone A by the Flood Insurance Program
which means that the entire town is located in a flood plain area.
While implementing the town's Community Development project, an
elevation study was necessary to raise houses such that they would be
able to withstand flooding in the area. Additionally, families were
required to obtain flood insurance. In order to continue the
protection of lives and properties the town will periodically examine
local policies to ensure all buildings, facilities and development are
designed to withstand the potential damages of flooding from a 100
year storm.
VI. Constraints: Community Facilities
The town receives its water supply from the Pamlico County Water
Department. Currently, service from this system is adequate to meet
the demands of the citizens and the town.
The proposed Bay River Metropolitan Sewerage District would
eliminate the present problems associated with septic tanks in the
area. The funding for this system is secure and the facility
is currently in the construction planning phase.
The town provides weekly garbage services for its citizens.
However, police protection is available through the County Sheriff
Department. Fire protection is provided by a volunteer fire
department of an adjoining community. Town officials are actively
developing a volunteer fire department within the town.

— 12 —
There remains a great need to develop recreational facilities to
accommodate the diverse interest and needs of the varied population
ages of the town. The issue of funding such a facility continues to
be a major obstacle. Given the reduction of federal funds for such
facilities and the lack of local funds, this problem is very difficult
to overcame.
VII. Fragile Areas
The fragile areas of specific concern to Mesic remain as discuss—
ed in the 1981 Plan as follows:
Coastal Wetlands
Coastal wetlands are defined as any salt marsh or other marsh
subject to regular or occasional flooding by tides. Inclusive of this
are wind tides short of hurricane or tropical storm tides.
The town has a significant amount of land along Vandemere and
Plum Creeks. These areas are considered marsh lands with the
appropriate designation of areas of environmental concern.
Public Trust Areas
In keeping with the description of public Trust Areas contained
in the 1981 Plan, it is noted that the town has water areas which
could be grouped as Public Trust Waters. Such waters are basically
tidal and contain warm water. Fishing and boating are the restricted
use for this area. The recreational use for sport fishing and boating
continues to be an important activity for the town and area.
Additionally, commercial fishing in the bays and rivers is of economic
importance. Similarly, the creeks and streams provide spawning for
both shell and fin fish.

- 13 -
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Ocean Hazard Areas
The town has no ocean hazard area as specified in the 1981 Land
Use Plan. With such areas being descriptive of beaches, inlet land,
frontal dunes, etc., resting along the Atlantic ocean shoreline, it is
vulnerable to erosion or other adverse affects which could endanger
life or property. It is quite obvious that the town is not confront-
ed with such problem areas.
Coastal Areas that Sustain Remnant Species
Areas within the coastal community which support native plants or
animals determined to be rare or endangered are identified as
sustaining remnant specifies. Such areas provide habitats necessary
for the survival of existing population or communities of rare or
endangered species.
There continues to be no identified areas containing remnant
species within the town.
Esturaine Waters
Those waters within the Mesic area classified as esturaine in the
1981 Plan are as follows: Vandemere Creek - estuarine waters below
North Carolina 304 Bridge, inland waters above; Little Vandemere Creek
- inland waters; Long Creek - inland waters; Mesic Creek - inland
waters; Harris Creek - inland waters; Gascon Creek, inland waters;
Barnes Creek - inland waters; Patter Creek - inland waters; oyster
Creek - (on Bay River) estuarine waters; Blossom Pond Creek - (on Bay
River) inland waters; Bear Creek - ( on Bay River) estuarine waters;
Harpers Creek - inland waters; Riggs Creek - (on Bear Creek) estuarine
waters; Upper Branches of Bear Creek - inland waters; Win Creek - (on
Bear Creek) inland waters; Plum Creek - (on Bear Creek) inland waters;
1

' - 14 -
'
Cox Creek - (on Bear Creek) inland waters; Garden Creek - (on Bear
'
Creek) inland waters; Catchall Creek - (on Bear Creek) inland waters;
Chadwick Creek - (on Bear Creek) estuarine waters; No Jacket Creek -
(on Bay River) inland waters; Tar Creek - (on Bay River) estuarine
'
waters; Whealton Creek - (on Bay River) inland waters; Tar Landing Gut
- ( on Gale Creek) inland waters; Gale Creek - (1,000 ft. above Tar
'
Landing Gut) estuarine waters.
These creeks and guts may not fall within the Mesic planning
'
but interest to Mesic because their integral
jurisdiction are of of
relationship to the estuarine ecosystem within the jurisdiction and
general coastal area. Mesic will cooperate with the county in the
preservation and monitoring of development in these estuaries,
wetlands and marshlands.
'
Estuarine Shoreline
'
Estuarine Shorelines are described as those non -ocean shorelines
which are especially vulnerable to erosion, flooding, or other adverse
'
effects of wind and water and are intimately connected to the estuary.
They are located contiguous to estuaraine waters AEC from MBW for
a distance 75' inland.
As such, the entire shoreline in Mesic is subject to flooding.
This continues to be a major concern of citizens and elected
'
officials. The town will continue its cooperative efforts with the
county to preserve and monitor development in esturaines, wetlands and
'
marshlands.
1
1
I 1

- 15 -
I
VIII. Future Trends
' Ten Year Population Estimates
There are no figures for a ten year population estimate available
' from the Department of Administration for a town the size of Mesic.
The town must rely upon past trends to predict population growth.
Based upon 1980 Census data, the town expects no major decrease in
population over the next ten years. A modest increase in population
is expected to continue to a total of 434 in 1990, if the 1970 to
1980 trend of 8.4% increase continues.
Social and Economic Change
There are no major changes in the social or economic structure of
the town. Agriculture, forestry, and commercial fishing will continue
to be major income producers. It is anticipated, however, that the
'
forestry industry will increase while agriculture will follow the
statewide trends of less production. Further, it is expected that
1
Mesic residents will continue to rely upon income from external
'
industries. Additionally, as the economy of the county changes and
economic development increase, Mesic's citizens will likely benefit.
'
Future Land Needs
As the town continues to seek economic development, the issue of
'
land developable
converting non productive within areas remains a
'
major concern. As forest land is used and agricultural land becomes
non -productive, the ability to convert these land uses for development
opportunities is a big challenge.

- 16 -
1
The town must continue its effort to encourage private
development outside AEC classification and provide assistance as
needed to interested developers.
Community Facilities Demands
The proposed sewer system for the area will be sufficient to meet
current and anticipated demands. Additionally, as previously
mentioned, this system will ameliorate a major health problem in the
town. The provision of this service may make the town more attractive
for development ventures which require sewerage treatment.
Recreational facilities along with a building to house the Mesic
fire station also are needed to meet current and future needs of the
town's citizens.
IX. Land Classification
The Land Classification System for the town will remain basically
as classified in the 1981 Plan. It was determined that three classes
of land would be more than adequate because of the size of Mesic and
lack of current or planned development which would have major impact
or conflicting uses.
After careful review it was concluded that the classes of
community, rural and conservation would allow for the orderly
development of land allowable in each of the classes used. A brief
summary of these classes are as follows:
(1) Community
(a) Purpose - The community class is to provide for clustered
land development to help meet housing, shopping, employment,
and public service needs within the rural areas of the
county.

11
1
(b) Description - Lands to be classified community are those
areas characterized by mixed land uses, (residences,
general store, church, school, etc.), which are suitable
and appropriate for small clusters of rural development not
requiring municipal sewer service. The proposed provision
of sewer services will eliminate health problems as
described. However, this service will not stimulate
additional growth or development of any appreciable scale.
(2) Rural
(a) Purpose - The rural class is to provide for agriculture,
forest management, mineral extraction and other low
intensity uses. Residences may be located within "rural"
area where natural resources will not be permanently
impaired.
(b) Description - Lands that can be identified as appropriate
for resource management and allied uses include lands with
high potential for agriculture, forestry, or mineral
extraction; and lands containing irreplaceable, limited, or
significant natural, recreational, or scenic resources.
It is noted that while the town has great interest in its
extra territorial area, there is no planning authority
allowed. The town will evaluate the need to take
appropriate action to exercise authority in this area.
(c) The town will allow subdivision development within rural
class lands. Any subdivision development planned will
conform with the county subdivision ordinance.
(3) Conservation
(a) Purpose - the conservation class is to provide for
effective long term management of significant limited or
irreplaceable areas. This management may be needed because

of its natural, cultural, recreational, productive or
scenic values. These areas should not be identified as
transition lands in the future.
(b) Description - The conservation class will be applied to
lands that contain: major wetlands; essentially
undeveloped shorelands that are unique, fragile or
hazardous for development; necessary wildlife habitat
conditions; publicly owned water supply watersheds and
aquifers; and undeveloped forest land which will remain
undeveloped for commercial purposes.
X. Current Plans, Policies and Regulations
Since the development and adoption of the 1981 Land Use Plan, there
have been no significant changes or development planned which would
require major revisions in plans or policies previously adopted.
tHowever, where new issues have surfaced, the town has addressed such
' issues and established policies within the guidelines established by the
Coastal Resource Commission. The major areas to be discussed are as
' follows:
- Local, state and federal regulations, plans and policies
- Resource protection
' - Resource production and management
- Economic and community development
' -Hurricane mitigation, reconstruction & evacuation
- Continuing public participation
1
I 1

1
' LEGEND
1
M COMMUNITY TOWN OF MESIC
1
Pamlico County, North Carolina
CONSERVATION
' ❑ KY1 � I,II
RURAL
1
°.t° �` :':fir,,h. {'::•+�i y:......
: r::t::?•}... •:.
1 _
',X iE
:. :r•:•:
. .Yt
}: a
..:........ .
1
{
{
r,
. s
.......
,
rr :Yr::4:•::•.
4
q
i
r.
ri 4 T
•::::.•.•:::::::::::::.::•' X:s
{
i \• r�Mr•:::.
iri 5•r, N:.....................: _ ::S• : _ _ ,
rt\ 1^. ���q
v
4 Q
't
M'.............V . a'
r•
r•
�'{ r
\ \ y rot
.t ,r.
t. rrlt��j . 33
•.., 4 tyi:,:
< r4 r ♦
t , 5t
;:f. „ .r.. hn.r �'r• -?r Eiji
,., .\4•' ., n,.lr .♦• S�':..'
;. \rry,•'; ���4�<j. `,,\q{�,r.. T>• ri''�,:r•�' ,{ti •• 1•...............: ..::�::::..
,.A
T°4i♦ r'fi f:•r. ♦rr o'. ♦;,rV ,!i t' .v
ri r 4 , ♦
K rr r,
t . i ♦. .
4,• r •t.
r
r -
t t
S ,$;
r r,
S "+r
r
N < r
P
15 ,r
r\ r r » ..»..._......»».... »....
F rYf. Yw
L.
rf`
r - ' i • �2
........
' .. YTryf✓rfY'rrI '. r✓ . :::.. ::'.]:.^.::•.:::
Yrr rr rri ri•I fi', 'at:'::...........::':::
The preparation of this document was financed in part through a`rr+; ....;
' rrr.yr Y ;:
grant provided by the North Carolina Coastal Management Program, YY+Y..... �€E�iEEb'sEi��E_ttc;,
through funds provided by the Coastal Zone Management Act of Y'ry ; =
1972, as amended, administered by the Office of Ocean and Coastal '' t ,.r'
r.. .. .rr.
' Resource Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration.
• I
Iowa
Tow„
Town limits
NOTE: Town does not exercise
any planning beyond it's bound-
aries. No Extra/Territorial
planning.

- 19 -
I
1
1
1
Local, State and Federal Regulations, Plans and Policies
A. Metropolitan Sewerage District 201 Plan
As recognized in the 1981 Land Use Plan, the lack of a sewerage
disposal system was the single most significant factor adversely affecting
growth and development within the town.
The planned Bay River Metropolitan Sewerage System scheduled for
construction in May, 1987, is strongly supported by town officials
and citizens. While the system capacity restricts development to ten
percent (10%) beyond the present need of the entire county, a number of
the present problems associated with septic tanks in the town will be
eliminated when construction is completed.
The town's policy is to continue to support the acquisition of funds
to expand the capacity of the proposed system.
B. Housing
As stated, the town has been successful in efforts to attract federal
funds for housing rehabilitation, demolition and relocation.
Approximately, thirty-eight houses were repaired through a Community
Development Block Grant awarded to the town. However, there still
remains a significant number of houses needing repairs. The town has
adopted a local housing code to further preserve and protect its housing
stock. Local public officials will continue to seek funding to improve
overall housing conditions, especially for low and moderate income
families.
1

I
20
I
1
1
I
1
C. Community Facilities
Since the adoption of the 1981 Land Use Plan, a Town Hall has been
acquired to conduct town affairs in a more business oriented environment.
However, recreation facilities and a fire station building are needed to
meet current and future needs of the citizenry.
Mesic's policy is to continue to seek federal and state assistance
in its efforts to develop additional community facilities.
D. Open Space and Outdoor Recreation
These issues as well as public access are significant to Mesic and
Pamlico County. As proposed in the initial planning activities, formal
plans and policy objectives should be initiated at the county level.
The town's policy is to coordinate with the county in its efforts to
seek state and federal assistance in addressing these issues.
Local Ordinances and Means of Enforcement of All Local Existing Land Use
Regulations
As was mentioned, the town has adopted a local housing code
regulating housing standards in its jurisdiction. A code enforcement
officer has been appointed. Septic tank regulations (in compliance with
North Carolina regulations) are enforced by the county's building
inspector and health department. Land use regulations (CAMA) are still
state enforced via county officials. The town has not adopted a zoning
ordinance or subdivision regulations.
The Town Council, in conjunction with county officials, will enforce
land use regulations.
1

-21-
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
Extraterritorial Jurisdiction
Based upon the potential for increased development likely to be
created by the construction of the sewerage system within and contiguous
to the town boundaries, the Town Council will take action to aggressively
exercise its extraterritorial jurisdiction to protect areas of critical
concern to the Coastal Resource Commission and the town citizenry.
XI. Resource Protection Policies
A. Areas of Environmental Concern (AEC)
The 1981 Land Use Plan stated in detail the town's policies and
objectives regarding the protection of Areas of Environmental Concern.
These areas make up the Estuarine System and all land areas of the
coast that contribute economic, social and biological value to Mesic and
Pamlico County in general. The following AEC's are included within the
system: estuarine waters, coastal wetlands, public trust areas, and
estuarine shorelines.
The town's objectives now are the same as those in 1981 and are to
give considerable priority to the protection, cooperative and coordinated
management of estuarine waters, coastal wetlands, public trust areas, and
estuarine shorelines, so as to safeguard and perpetrate the estuarine
system's biological, social, economic and aesthetic value by ensuring
that development that occurs within these AEC's is compatible with
natural characteristics so as to minimize the likelihood of significant
damage and/or loss of such public resources.
There are no structures within the town which are on the National
Register of Historic Places. However, there are eleven structures of

-22-
LJ
1
historical or architectural importance located in the town and its
vicinity which were included in the 1980 publication, "Pamlico County
Imagery," by Angela Barnett.
According to the Division of Archives and History of the North
Carolina Department of Cultural Resources, the town area has never been
subject to an archaeological survey. However , it was reported that one
prehistoric archaeological site is located within the town limits. It is
speculated that the site has been largely destroyed by residential
development.
It was further noted that archaelogical sites can be expected,
particularly in the vicinity of Vandemere and Plume Creeks. These areas
are to be considered "Archaeologically Sensitive Areas."
Policies - Protection of Natural and Fragile Areas
. The town discourages development in areas where soils are
particularly unsuited for septic tank use.
. Mesic supports the objectives of the CAMA in managing and
regulating areas of environmental concern.
Mesic will cooperate fully with the county to insure the availability
of fresh useable water from the acquifers providing the town and county's
water supply, and supports.
Any use is supported which does not endanger the health, welfare and
water supply needs of the Town and citizens of Mesic. The town will
follow closely the distribution practices of federal programs and
regulations regarding both ground water and subsurface acquifers.
IJ

- 23 -
I
LJ
1
. Mesic will ensure that future development near shorelines adheres to
state sedimentation control regulations and that all appropriate actions
are taken to minimize non -point pollution from agricultural run-off,
unplanned clearing of woodland for production, forest and other
resource -oriented activities.
. The town will encourage development and site design in known fragile
areas which minimizes the extent of impervious surfaces and storm water
runoff from ditches and agricultural lands.
. Mesic will support county and state efforts in regulating development
and the placement of septic tanks and other sewerage disposal systems, to
ensure the protection of groundwater resources.
. Mesic supports and encourages the development of a public
access/facility within its jurisdiction. Mesic will ensure that
development of such facilities, complies strictly with state health and
AEC regulations. The acquisition of historically used public access
areas by the town has been considered one method to assure that these
areas remain open for public use.
. Second home development in Mesic at present has not generated undue
concerns. These hones have met the required health and subdivision
regulations and served to increase the town's tax base. Mesic's policy
is to encourage second ham development meeting state and county
regulations.
. Mesic is very concerned about the water quality of the Neuse
River. It is felt that septic tanks located in poor soils near water and
the water table, agricultural run-off from farms, forestry management
operations and mosquito control ditching programs all contribute to

' -24-
I
degradation of Neuse River water quality. The town will continue to
cooperate with and support all relevant county, state and/or federal
' programs and regulations concerning water quality. The town remains
committed to the installation of county -wide public sewer services which
will eliminate a major source of pollution.
' B. Constraints to Development
' Constraints to development in Mesic are those stated in the 1981 Land
Use Plan, which include: man-made hazard areas, natural hazard areas
such as areas subject to erosion and flooding and soils with limited
' capacity to sustain development.
1. Man -Made Hazard Areas
As pointed out during the initial planning activities, there
are no man-made hazards in Mesic's planning jurisdiction.
2. Natural Hazard Areas and Soils
As related to the natural hazard areas and soils, policies
will remain as stated in the 1981 Land Use Plan which are as follows:
a. Excessive Erosion - Prevent undue and un-
necessary loss of life or property due to
excessive erosion.
b. Coastal Flood Plain - Ensure all development
compliance with local ordinances and meet
requirements of Federal Flood Insurance cover-
age.

- 25 -
1
1
c. Soils - Support the U.S. Soil Conservation
Service program via enforcement of state and
Federal Health Regulations related to soils.
Mesic adopted a resolution opposing the current use of Brant Island
by the U.S. Marine Corps. This resolution remains in effect.
With the exception of the housing code, Mesic has not passed an
ordinance regulating development in its jurisdiction. Thus, policies
have been and will continue to address the strict enforcement of local
building and health regulations, federal flood insurance regulations and
those regulations of federal and state enforcement and permitting
agencies.
C. Hurricane and Flood Plain Evacuation Need and Plans
The town has not adopted a local hurricane and flood plain evacuation
plan. Because of its limited resources and for better coordination and
effectiveness, the town has adopted and currently utilizes the hurricane
plan for Pamlico County.
The plan, prepared in 1985, provides for the orderly and coordinated
evacuation to minimize the effects of hurricanes on residents of Pamlico
County, including all local jurisdiction.
The plan requires the alerting of selected municipal and county
officials, the evacuation of the public from danger areas and designation
of shelter for evacuatees. It also provides for re-entry into evacuated
areas when the threat to persons is ended.
The plan requires joint action by county and municipal governments, a
joint organization for decision -making and use of resources.

- 26 -
The town has four (4) representatives currently serving as central
group members. Town officials places great priority on this critical
area.
D. Storm Water Run -Off
The town has not experienced any significant problems related to
storm water run-off. However, it is acutely aware of the inability to
control run-off associated with residential and agricultural activities.
The town does not have a storm water system to control run-off. As a
matter of policy, the town will ensure all construction activities
conforms to required county and state standards. Further, it will
coordinate all development activities with county officials.
XII. Resource Production and Management Policies
The importance of agriculture, forestry and commercial fishing is
clearly recognized by town officials as outlined in the 1981 Land Use
Plan. Current policies remain to support the protection of agricultural
production, acceptable forestry management practices and the preservation
of productive fisheries.
A. Productive Agricultural Land
While the town is not dependent on productive agricultural land,
support is continued of such land for agriculture purposes.
B. Forestry
The town remain supportive of the preservation of forestry land and
forestry management practices which do not substantially harm the
■ environment.
' C. Commercial and Recreational Fisheries
The town is fully supportive of recreational and commercial fishing
I

-27-
CJ
I
1
11
11
activities. As such it strongly support the preservation of productive
fisheries located in and around its jurisdiction. The importance of this
activity is clearly recognized by town officials. A number of town
citizens depends on commercial fishing for their livelihood.
D. Off -Road Vehicle
Since the town has not experienced any problems with off -road
vehicles there has not been a policy developed in this area. However,
this issue will be closely watched to determine a need for such a policy.
XIII. Economic and Community Development Policies
The economic and community development goals and objectives of the
town shall remain as adopted during the 1981 planning activity.
Recognizing its limitations, the town will still advocate moderate
growth and development while protecting and preserving the natural
environment. Mesic feels that continued moderate growth is necessary to
its survival. Single and multi -family housing units are not only needed
but will be encouraged by town officials. Such housing will not only
impact desired growth but will meet envisioned future housing needs.
As stated previously, the development of the planned sewerage system
will eliminate major health problems experienced from septic tanks, but
due to its limited capacity, the system will not measurably increase the
potential for industrial and/or commercial development. Thus, current
policy will continue coordination with county, state and federal
agencies in seeking additional funds to increase the capacity of the
planned sewerage system to accommodate greater industrial and residential
development. .

WFI-M
I
L
The town as a matter of stated policy view the planned sewerage
system as a means of generating growth in the area. As a small town with
no econanic base, it is desired that development occur in the area.
Any non-polluting industry supportive of the fishing industry, light
manufacturing or service industry is seen as canpatible with the
development desired to occur within the town.
Xiv. Hurricane Mitigation Reconstruction and Evacuation
Town citizens and officials are concerned about program and policies
designed to minimizing the effects of hurricanes as well as programs
which are designed to protect lives and properties.
As a coastal community, the town is equally vulnerable to hurricanes,
tropical storms and other severe weather conditions. Consequently, there
is more than surface interest in policies and coordination in the area of
hurricanes mitigation and reconstruction.
There have been no flood insurance rate maps completed for the town
by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The 100 year flood
has been adopted by FEMA as the base flood for purposes of flood plain
management activities. Accordingly, this line represents the level in
which water would reach during a flood that is expected to occur on the
average of once during a 100-year period.
A review of the county flood insurance rate map revealed that Mesic
is classified in an A Zone. This means that the town is subject to
100-year flooding.
The town has adopted policies as follows:
i

-29-
a. The town fully supports the National Flood Insurance program.
be to
Development in flood plain areas will continue to subject
'
the elevation and flood proofing requirements specified under the
regular phase of the National Flood Insurance program.
'
b. The town will continue its educational program of hurricane and
flood hazard to citizens and property owners.
the Post -hurricane Recovery and
c. If county appoints a
'
Reconstruction Task Force, the town will work with county
officials to ensure its has representation. In the absence of
'
such a task force, the town will evaluate the feasibility of
coordinating this activity directly with a state agency. It is
'
to be noted that the town has meaningful participation in the
'
county's hurricane plan.
d. The town council will work with the county's post hurricane
'
damage assessment team to ensure the town's needs are meet as
related to federal and state disaster assistance funds,
reconstruction and rebuilding needs and the identification of
available mitigation opportunities.
e. The town will continue to evaluate local transportation needed
to evacuate its citizens as well as work with county officials
regarding transportation issues and capacity.
f. The town will participate in all county simulated hurricane
evacuation and emergency management drill to ensure citizens
are familiarized with emergency procedures.
g. The town will continue its work with county elected and appointed

-30-
officials in all aspects of hurricane and flood plain management
activities.
Public Access
The issue of public access received many comments during a review of
the town's Land Use Plan. It is clearly recognized that there is a need
for public access to the rivers within the town limits for recreational
and commercial use.
The town supports an analysis of potential sites for public use and
will study the feasibility of seeking state funds to address this need.
XV. Continuing Public Participation Policies
Mesic used several methods to assure public involvement in the
development of the Land Use Plan update. Notices of all meetings were
published in the local newspapers. Also, notices of meetings were
distributed door-to-door and announced in various church activities. A
summary of the meetings conducted are as follows: Plan Update
Orientation - December 29, 1986; Basic Work Plan, Data Analysis, and
Public Comments - January 19, 1987; Review of Initial Draft and Public
Comment - February 23, 1987; Review of Policies and Public Comments - May
4, 1987.
The town feels that participation in these meetings came from a
variety and cross section of citizens. It is felt that citizen
participation was more than adequate. More importantly, the input and
comments of citizens were extremely valuable to the efforts to update the
town's plan.
The town strongly supports and encourages citizen participation in
' all planning activities.

- 31 -
G
' The Town Council, by ordinance,
designated
the Planning Board
of the
Town of Mesic to be responsible for
continuing
efforts to involve
the
' public in the planning process.
11
1
[I