Land Use Plan Update-1990

1-i
ti
1
n.
DCM COPY DCM COPY
lease do not remove!!!!!
Division of Coastal Management
HENRY VON OESEN AND ASSOCIATES
CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS

11
1
KURE BEACH, NORTH CAROLINA
FINAL SUBMITTAL
TOWN ADOPTION DATE: JULY 23, 1991
CRC APPROVAL DATE: SEPTEMBER 27, 1991
Prepared For:
The Mayor and Board of Commissioners
Town of Kure Beach
Kure Beach, North Carolina
Prepared By:
HENRY VON OESEN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Engineers & Planners
805 North Third Street -- P. 0. Drawer 2087
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402
[phone]
The preparation of this document and the associated maps was
financed in part through a grant provided by the North Carolina
Coastal Management Program, through funds provided the Coastal
Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, which is administered by
the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
3606 (061291)
1

Ll
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1990 KURE BEACH LAND USE PLAN UPDATE
SECTION/DESCRIPTION PAGE(S)
SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION
1.1 The CAMA Land Use Plan . . •. . . . . . . . 1-1
1.2 Summary of Data Collection and Analysis . . . . . . 1-2-
SECTION
2: PRESENT CONDITIONS
2.1
Physical Setting and History of
Kure Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 2-1
2.2
Present Population and Economy . . . . . . . .
. . 2-2
2.3
Existing Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 2-3
2.3.1 Current Land Use. . . . . . . . .
. . 2-3
2.3.2 Land Use Regulations. . . . . . . . . .
. . 2-5
2.3.3 Land and Water Use Compatibility
Problems from Unplanned Development . .
. . 2-6
2.3 .4 Areas of Significant Land Use Change.
2-7
Table 2.3.1 Existing Land Use
2.4
Current Plans, Policies, and Regulations
2-7
2.4.1 Current Land Use Regulations. . . . . .
. . 2-7
2.4.2. Plans and Policies . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 2-9
2.4.3 1985 Kure Beach Land Use Plan . . .
. . 2-11
SECTION 3: CONSTRAINTS; LAND SUITABILITY
3.1 Physical Limitations for Development . . . . . . 3-1
3.1.1 Soils Limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1
3.1.2 Water Supply. . . . . . . . . . . 3-2
Map 3.1.1 Soils Map.
Table 3.1.1 Soil Properties and
Limitation to Development

Table of Contents, Continued
Page 2
SECTION/DESCRIPTION PAGE(S)
Section 3: Constraints; Land Suitability, Continued
3.2 Fragile Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-3
3.2.1 Areas of Environmental Concern. . . . . . . 3-5..-
3.2.1.1 Estuarine System AECs. . . . . . . 3-5
3.2.1.2 Ocean Hazard Areas . . . . . . . . 3-10
3.3 Areas with Resource Potential. . . . . . . . . . . 3-13
SECTION 4: CONSTRAINTS; CARRYING CAPACITY ANALYSIS
4.1
Community Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . 4-1
4.2
Water Supply System . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . 4-1
4.3
Wastewater Treatment and Disposal. . . . . .
. . . 4-2
4.4
Solid Waste Disposal . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . 4-3
4.5
Transportation Facilities . . . . . . . . . .
. . . 4-4
Table 4.5 Kure Beach Traffic Counts
4.6
Fire Protection, Police Protection, and
Medical Service. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . 4-5
4.7
Educational Facilities . . . . . . . . . .
4-6
4.8
Recreational Facilities.
4-6
4.9
Man Made Hazards
4-7
SECTION 5: ESTIMATED DEMAND
5.1 Population and Economy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-1
5.1.1 Local Objectives for Growth and
Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-3
Table 5.1 Population Growth
Table 5.2 Future Population Estimates

Table of Contents, Continued
Page 3
5.2 Future Land Use Needs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-3
Table 5.1.3 Maximum Density Projection
5.3 Community Facilities Demand. . . . . . . . . . . . 5-3
SECTION 6: LAND USE POLICIES
6.1 Resource Protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 6-1
6.1.1
Areas of Environmental Concern . . . . .
. 6-1
6.1.2
The Estuarine System . . . . . . . . . .
. 6-1
6.1.3
Ocean Hazard Areas . . . . . . . . . . .
. 6-4
6.1.4
Stormwater Runoff. . . . . . .
. 6-8
6.1.5
Beach Management and Shoreline
Erosion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 6-9
6.1.6
All Marinas, Floating Homes,
Sound and Estuarine Islands. . . . . . .
. 6-11
6.1.7
Potable Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 6-11
6.1.8
Rising Sea Level . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 6-11
6.1.9
Shoreline Structures . . . . .
6-11
6.1.10
Wastewater Treatment and Disposal.
6-12
6.1.11
Solid Waste Disposal . . . . . . . . . .
. 6-13
6.1.12
Storm Drainage . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 6-13
6.1.13
Man -Made Hazards . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 6-13
6.1.14
Industrial Impacts on Fragile Areas. . .
. 6-14
6.2 Resource Production and Management . . . . . . .
. 6-14
6.2.1
Tourism - Ocean Waters and Beaches. . . .
. 6-14
6.2.2
Commercial and Recreational Fisheries . .
. 6-14
6.2.3
Dredging Activities . . . . . . . . . . .
. 6-15
6.2.4
Productivity Enhancement. . . . . . . . .
. 6-15
6.3 Economic Growth and Community Development.
6-16
6.3.1
Land Use Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 6-16
6.3.2
Central Business District. . . . . . . .
. 6-17
6.3.3
Location, Type and Density of
Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 6-17
6.3.4
Intergovernmental Cooperation. . . . . .
. 6-17
6.3.5
Fort Fisher Military Base and Sunny
Point Marine Ocean Terminal Zone. . . .
. 6-18

Table of Contents, Continued
Page 4
SECTION/DESCRIPTION
PAGE(S)
Section
6, Land Use Policies, Continued
6.3.6 Transportation . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 6-18
6.3.7 Beach Access and Recreational
Facilities . . . . . .
. . 6-19
6.3.8 Cammittment to State and Federal
Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 6-19
6.3.9 Energy Facility Siting and
Development. . . . . . . . . .
. . 6-2 0
6.3.10 Tourism/Type and Location of Industry.
. . 6-20
6.4
Storm Hazard Mitigation, Evacuation and
Post Disaster Recovery Plan. . . . . . . . . .
. . 6-20
6.4.1 Mitigation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 6-21
6.4.2 Evacuation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 6-23
6.4.3 Post Disaster Recovery. . . . . . . . .
. . 6-23
6.5
Continuing Public Particpation . . . . . . . .
. . 6-27
6.6
CAMA Policy Issues Not Relevant to Kure Beach.
6-27
SECTION
7: LAND CLASSIFICATION
7.1
Background and Purpose. . ... . . . . . . . . .
. . 7-1
7.2
Kure Beach Land Classification. . . . . . . . .
. . 7-1
7.2.1 Developed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 7-2
7.2.2 Conservation . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 7-3
7.3
Kure Sound Land Classification . . . . . . . .
. . 7-4
7.3.1 Developed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 7-4
7.3.2 Limited Transition . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 7-5
7.3.3 Community Resource Preservation. . . . .
. . 7-5
7.3.4 Conservation . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 7-6
SECTION 8: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
8.1 Citizen Participation Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-1
Table 8.1.1: Citizen Participation Plan

Table of Contents, Continued
Page 5
SECTION/DESCRIPTION
PAGE (S )
8.2 Citizen Survey Questionnaires . . . . . . . . . . . 8-1
8.2.1 Mail -out Surveys . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-2
8.2.2 Telephone Survey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-3
8.2.3 Newspaper Survey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-3
8.3 Summary of Meetings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-3
APPENDIX A: CITIZEN SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
APPENDIX B: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MINUTES OF MEETINGS ON LAND USE PLANNING
APPENDIX C: SENATE BILL Ill: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
LISTING OF MAPS (Map Pocket)
Map 1 Existing Land Use
Map 2 Zoning Map
Map 3 Community Facilities
Map 4 Fragile Areas and Areas of Environmental Concern
Map 5 Land Classification Map

ISECTION 1: INTRODUCTION
1.1 The CAMA Land Use Plan
The coastal area of North Carolina provides a tremendous
natural resource to the citizens of North Carolina and to
visitors from other states. The area provides recreational
benefits and an abundance of fish and shellfish production from
its coastal waters. In many areas along the coast, there is
danger that pollution from the overdevelopment may significantly
damage the food production capacity of these waters. This
potential problem was one of the major reasons that the Coastal
Area Management Act (LAMA) was ratified by the North Carolina
General Assembly in 1974. The purpose of the Coastal Area
Management Act is "to insure the orderly balance of use and
preservation of our resources on behalf of the people of North
Carolina and the Nation."
Land development generally takes place as the result of a
series of decisions by private individuals and government. If
left entirely to chance, the resulting pattern of development in
a locality may well not be in the best overall community
interest. In order to promote this community interest for both
present and future generations, the land use plan is developed,
adopted, and kept current by the local governments in the coastal
area. A land use plan is a vision of how future development
should take place within a community; it defines a set of
policies governing natural resources, land use, and the type,
location, and quantity of future development. A land use plan

provides a blueprint for future growth so that growth will occur
on the community's own terms rather than in a haphazard fashion.
The Land Use Plan is a framework that will guide local
leaders as
they
make
decisions
affecting
development.
Private
individuals
and
other
levels of
government
will also use
the plan
as a guide to their land use decisions. State and federal
agencies will use the local land use plan and policies in making
project consistency, funding, and permit decisions. Use of the
plan by all these groups should lead to a more efficient and
economical provision of public services, the protection of
natural resources, sound economic development, and the protection
of health and safety.
The Town of Kure Beach developed its first CAMA Land Use Plan
in 1976. According
to regulation, the Plan
is updated
every 5
years, this being
the third update for the
Kure Beach
Land Use
Plan. The Plan has
been and continues to be
valuable as
a source
of community information, and, as a guide to local growth and
development in Kure Beach.
1.2 Summary of Data Collection
and
Analysis
Data contained in this Land
Use
Plan
comes from a variety of
sources.
Various
state,
county, and
local agencies were
contacted
for both
general
and specific
detailed information.
Technical reports, previous land use plans, and other documents
were
reviewed as well.
Field
surveys
provided information on
land
use and community
needs.
Citizen
participation provided
public input on community issues.
1-2

The population :of Kure Beach has continued to increase and
the primary land use remains residential. More detailed
information (including recent development approvals) is contained
in the following sections of the report. Also, Section 2.4
contains an analysis of the effectiveness of Town policies in the
1985 Land Use Plan.
ri
1 1-3

I
ISECTION 2: PRESENT CONDITIONS
r2.1 Physical Setting and History of Kure Beach
The Town of Kure Beach is located on "Pleasure Island" a
'
narrow barrier island in New Hanover County, along the southern
portion of North Carolina's coastal plain. The Town is bounded
on the north
by the Wilmington -Hanby Beach Community, on
the
south by the
Fort Fisher Historic Area and on the west by
the
Sunny Point
Marine Ocean Terminal (MOTSU) Buffer Zone.
The
island faces
the Atlantic Ocean on the east and is separated
from
the mainland by the Cape Fear River and Snows Cut located north
of Carolina Beach. The area displays many of the features
' characteristic of Mid -Atlantic barrier islands: beaches and
dunes, dense maritime vegetation in scene undeveloped areas, and
' marshlands.
I
Kure Beach is a quiet, family oriented residential and
vacation community. The Town, incorporated in 1947, was
originally named Fort Fisher Sea Beach, but had always been
called Kure Beach in honor of the Kure Family who owned much of
the land in the area. Fishing has long been a popular
recreational activity at Kure Beach. When the first fishing pier
was built in 1923, people were brought to the beach by train
before the road extended south from Carolina Beach. Over the
past several
years,
Kure Beach
has seen
increased growth and
development
and its
popularity
growing
as more people have
1 "discovered" this beach area and the Town's charm and amenities.
2-1

2.2 Present Population and Economy
The population of Kure Beach can be defined as having several
distinct components; the permanent residents, the seasonal
residents/non-resident property owners, and the day visitors.
In 1990 it is estimated that there are 1,488 residences in
l./
Kure Beach. Approximately 82 percent (1,220) of these are
seasonal/summer rental housing units. The 1990 year-round
population at Kure Beach is estimated to be 929 persons. The
vacation season generally extends from mid -May to Labor Day, with
an extended period of visitation taking place from April through
October including, for Kure Beach, the fishing season. The
Fourth of July weekend is often the peak visitation period.
Seasonal/summer rental units at Kure Beach can accommodate
anywhere from four to ten or more persons, with the average
number being around six to seven. Accordingly, the population at
Kure Beach swells during the seasonally warm months. In
addition, many day visitors also come to Kure Beach from other
parts of New Hanover County and adjoining counties. The total
peak seasonal population for Kure Beach in 1990 is estimated at
9,249 persons. Population trends and future projections are
discussed in Section 3.1.
Population data in this section are from the N. C. Office of
State Budget an Management, and the New Hanover County
Planning Department, the 1985 Kure Beach Land Use plan, and
Henry von Oesen and Associates, Inc.
2-2

1
Permanent residents of Kure Beach are generally retired,
employed by the Town, or employed on the mainland. Based on
information obtained in the citizen survey on age, income and
occupation (see Appendix A), the economy of Kure Beach is
strongly tied to tourism and real estate sales and rentals.
There are only a few commercial establishments open year round.
During the spring and summer, restaurants open and the fishing
' pier offers amusements for the community and its visitors.
1-1
LI
2.3 Existing Land Use
2.3.1 Current Land Use
The predominant land uses in Kure Beach are residential
' and/or tourism related. Homes range from single family to
quadriplex. Apartments and condominiums are also homes to
permanent residents as well as second homes to seasonal
rresidents,
and/or rental accommodations for vacationers. Lot
sizes - are at a minimum of 5,000 square feet. Since 1985, six (6)
subdivisions and 222 lots were approved in Kure Beach, 411
building permits.were issued, and 98 residences were constructed.
Single family homes occupy most of the developed land area,
as shown on Map 1, "Existing Land Use" and as indicated by Table
2.3.1. Significant portions of the large vacant land tract at
the north end of the town are currently being platted and
1
developed as planned single family residential communities.
Duplexes and some triplexes and quadriplexes are scattered
throughout Kure Beach, and there are several apartments as well.
I.The most prominent multi -family housing developments are the
1
2-3

TABLE 2.3.1
EXISTING LAND USE
KURE BEACH, NORTH CAROLINA
(APPROXIMATE ACREAGES)*
i1985
1990
Single Family 45.7
59.5
Duplex/Triplex 7.7**
4.9
'
Multifamily 24 .2***
27.2
Mobile Home 2.8
2.4
8.7
9.6
Motel
Commercial 2.2
2.4
Utilities 6.6
7.0
Industry 29.5
29.5
Public/Institutional 2.0
2.8
Parks/Recreational 22.4
22.4
Totals 151.8
167.7
Total Residential
(Includes Motels) 89.1
99.2
Vacant Platted Lots -----
64.5
Sources: 1985 Kure Beach Land Use Plan
Henry von Oesen and Associates, Inc.
*Increases and numbers may not reflect absolute land
values given
any differences in survey /calculation methods.
**1985 includes 2, 3, 4, and 5 unit residences; 1990
includes
duplexes and triplexes only.
***1985 includes multifamily residences with six or
more units;
1990 includes residences with four or more units.

1
condominiums located along U.S. 421 at the southern end of the
town. A small number of mobile homes are located within Kure
Beach, typically found in a few small clusters. One such area
lies between J and K Avenues and along 5 th and 6 th Avenues.
Hanby Beach, adjacent to Kure Beach as shown on the map, consists
largely of mobile homes.
Commercial land use in Kure Beach is concentrated in the
downtown area and is
generally
oriented toward tourism.
There
are several motels,
ranging
from small cottages to the
larger,
multi -unit facilities.
Three
restaurants are clustered
around
the pier area along K
Street.
Small shops and convenience
stores
are other commercial
land uses
within the town.
Transportation and utility land use areas shown on the Kure
Beach Land Use Map are associated with telephone, water supply,
and sewer. Town utilities are located in greater detail on the
Community Facilities Map, Map 3.
A large area between N Avenue and Club Drive is being used
primarily for "industrial" purposes as a corrosion test facility
by the International Nickel Company (INCO) .
Military presences are found adjacent to Kure Beach and lie
within its extra -territorial jurisdictional bounds. The Sunny
Point Military Ocean Terminal land serves as a buffer zone for
the actual terminal which is located on the western shore of the
Cape Fear River. The Fort Fisher Air Force Base is presently in
an inactive status, although it is maintained and remains in
military control at this time. It is used as a recreation site
2-4

for active and retired military, and functions as a training site
for the North Carolina National Guard as well.
Parks and open space at Kure Beach comprise a full city block
bounded by J, 7th, K and 8th Streets. The Town leases this land
within the Sunny Point Buffer Zone for recreational facilities
and municipal activities.
Several parcels of land support office and institutional land
uses in Kure Beach. Town uses include the existing Town Hall and
Police Station, the forthcoming new Town Hall, and storage and
maintenance property. Two churches and church -owned property,
and the U.S. Post Office are also included in this land use
category.
Most of the vacant land in Kure Beach is owned by realtors,
developers, individuals, and families. In addition to the large
vacant areas shown on the Land Use map, there are many smaller,
platted vacant building lots on the island. While most property
in Kure Beach is considered generally "buildable", suitability
for development on
these sites should
be made
on a case -by -case
basis. Individual
parcels and the
larger
tracks should be
evaluated in terms of flood hazard, soils, wetlands, and other
environmental factors to determine the feasibility of developing
these vacant areas.
2.3.2 Land Use Regulations
Documents and ordinances currently governing development and
land use in Kure Beach include the Town zoning ordinance and
subdivision regulations along with the Town Land Use Plan (see
Section 5.1 for details). Flood insurance regulations are also
2-5

applicable in certain areas. zoning districts are shown on Map
2, and flood zones are shown on Map 4.
r2.3.3 Land and Water Use Compatibility Problems and Problems
From Unplanned Development
At this time, there are no significant problems from
Iunplanned development in Kure Beach, nor are there any
significant land use compatibility problems. During the summer
season, there is high demand for the public parking spaces along
"K" Avenue among beach visitors and restaurant/store patrons
alike. This is to be expected where commercial establishments
Iare located proximal to the recreational beach. The Town is
controlling the extent of this situation by rerouting day
' visitors to use other points of beach access, discouraging any
increase in parking (which would only exacerbate the problem),
and enforcing its zoning ordinance. To avoid future land use
problems in Kure Beach, the Town will continue to enforce its
zoning -:and subdivision ordinances, and regularly review each
' ordinance in terms of its appropriateness and effectiveness in
1 achieving the Town's objectives for growth and development. This
is particularly important for areas where zoning differs from
I
general use and land classification goals, for example, the large
tract zoned B-3 has tended towards single family development.
There could be problems if a developer proposed a small
commercial development. These objectives include maintaining
Kure Beach's character as a low to medium density residential
' community with a quiet family atmosphere (see Section 6.3) .
1 2-6

At this time, there are no plans for releasing the Fort
Fisher Military Base or allowing any development within the Sunny
Point Buffer Zone. If conditions change on either of these
sites, however, any development should be consistent with the
Town' s land use regulations and the policies of the Town' s Land
Use Plan.
2.3.4 Areas of Significant Land Use Change
Areas of Kure Beach experiencing significant land use change
are primarily vacant land and natural areas becoming developed
property.
Several
new
subdivisions are now being
developed and
remaining
vacant
lots
in other neighborhoods are
being built
upon. In the future, Kure Beach is likely to see some
redevelopment of currently developed areas as well, particularly
among the older residences and in the downtown area. The Town's
zoning ordinance and development requirements, however, do not
lend themselves to any significant changes in land use.
Town policies concerning types and density of development and
redevelopment, along with the ordinances discussed in Section
2.3.2 above, are designed to insure that development proceeds in
a fashion compatible with Town desires as expressed in this
document.
2.4 Current Plans, Policies, and Regulations
2.4.1 Current Land Use Regulations
The primary ordinances currently governing development and
land use in Kure Beach include the Town zoning ordinance and
subdivision regulations.
2-7

• Zoning Ordinance. The Kure Beach Zoning Ordinance was
codified in 1987. The ordinance divides the town into
twelve zoning districts, of which nine are residential and
three are commercial. The ordinance prescribes allowable
uses, maximum height limits, minimum parking requirements,
'
and other requirements for the various districts, and
'
contains provisions for variances and non -conforming uses.
Minimum lot size is 5,000 square feet for a single family
dwelling. Multiple family dwellings require 2,500 square
feet for each family unit. General uses for each district
'
are listed below.
'
• RA-1
Low Density Single Family
• RA-2
Low Density Single Family/Duplexes
'
• RA-3
Single Family/Duplex/Hotels/Office & Institutional
• RA-4
Single Family/Multi-Family/Hotels
'
• RA-1A
Low Density Single Family
• RA-2A
Single Family/Multi-Family
• RA-3A
Single Family/Duplex/Multi-Family/Hotels with
1
Shops
• RB
Single Family/Duplex/Multi-Family/Hotels/Retail
B-1
Centrally located trade
•
and commercial service
'
area of the community and region. The regulations
of this district are designed to encourage the
1
continued use of land for regional trade and
commercial service uses to permit a concentrated
development
of permitted use while maintaining a
substantial relationship between the intensity of
2-8

land use and the capacity of utilities and
streets.
• B-2 Established for those areas of the community where
the principal use of land is to provide for the
retailing of goods and services to surrounding
residential neighborhoods. The regulations of the
district are designed
to reduce
traffic
and
parking congestion to
a minimum
in order
to
protect the surrounding residential area.
• B-3 Accommodates retail establishments and office uses
providing personal services to the general public,
and designed to benefit the public interest, and
promote and protect the public health, safety,
morals and general welfare.
The areal distribution of zoning districts within Kure
Beach is shown on Map 2, the Town zoning map.
• Subdivision Regulations. This ordinance was adopted in
September 1981 and provides procedures and site
requirements for the subdivision and platting of land in
Kure Beach and its extraterritorial area. Provisions for
planned unit developments (PUD's) are included in this
ordinance.
2.4.2 Plans and Policies
• Carolina Beach -Kure Beach Thoroughfare Plan (1973)
This plan categorizes routes and roadways within the Carolina
Beach -Kure Beach area, and outlines recommendations and desired
improvements of specific areas. Important traffic and roadway
2-9

improvements presently under consideration at Kure Beach are
discussed in Section 6.3.6.
• Wilmington -New Hanover County Land Use Plan (1986)
While the New Hanover County Land Use Plan does not supersede
the Kure Beach Land Use Plan, it addresses many of the same
issues, viewed by the County of which the Town is part. It can
also provide valuable information and insights about the area,
including the goals, policies, and directives the County intends
for areas in its jurisdiction.
The Wilmington -New Hanover County does not include Kure Beach
'
in its planning area for land use planning matters. The County
does, however, classify the entire area of Pleasure Island south
of Kure Beach as conservation in the land classification map.
'
• The Carolina -Kure Beach 201 Facilities Plan (1977)
This plan (and amendments thereto) details the evaluation of
wastewater treatment and disposal needs for these communities.
The plan includes the development of the selected optional
facilities plan for Kure Beach and Carolina Beach, which is now
' in effect today. Town sewer facilities are further discussed in
Sections 2.4.2, 4.2.2, and 6.1.9.
' • Storm Hazard Mitigation, Evacuation, and Post -Disaster
Recovery Plan
Kura Beach's Storm Hazard Mitigation, Evacuation and
' Post -Disaster Recovery Plan is integral and incorporated in the
New Hanover County Storm Hazard Mitigation, Evacuation, and
Post -Disaster Recovery Plan. The plan first defines methods by
I
which efforts have been made to reduce or minimize storm damages.
I 2-10

It then outlines steps of an organized plan to insure a safe and
effective evacuation. Finally, procedures for re-entry to the
island and town, damage assessment, and reconstruction are
detailed. The plan is further discussed in Section 6.4.
The Town of Kure Beach participates in the National Flood
Insurance Program.
2.4.3 1985 Kure Beach Land Use Plan
The Kure Beach Land Use Plan, first adopted in 1976, has been
used as a guide to help insure future growth and development
which proceeds at a rate and degree acceptable to the Town, while
maintaining the quality of life and environmental integrity of
the area. The Land Use Plan can be imagined as an umbrella which
encompasses the Town's zoning ordinance and its other land use
and regulatory mechanisms.
As mentioned above, the first Land Use Plan was developed in
1976. Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA) regulations require
updates to the Plan every 5 years. The 1980 Land Use Plan Update
focused further organization and definition of the Land Use Plan
for Kure Beach. Specific land use policies were first introduced
into the Plan as a part of this update. The 1985 CAMA Plan
Update cycle included the refinement of policies and the addition
of storm hazard planning policies into the Land Use Plan. In the
1990 CAMA Land Use Plan Update cycle, one goal is to further
refine and detail Town policies so to clarify their intent and
enhance their effectiveness.
The Town of Kure Beach has analyzed how effectively it has
implemented the policies contained in the 1985 Land Use Plan.
2-11

The analysis revealed achievements as well as areas where
policies needed revision or improvement. This evaluation began
' at the beginning of the plan update process and has continued to
' evolve throughout the planning period. The evaluation has
provided a foundation on which the policies of this plan were
' formulated (Section 6) .
The effectiveness of policies contained in the 1985 Land Use
Plan and notable findings from the evaluation are discussed below
under the following general categories: Resource Protection;
Resource Production and Management; Provision of Services;
Economic and Community Development; Storm Hazard Mitigation,
Evacuation and Post Disaster Recovery Plan; and Continuing
Citizen Participation.
• Resource
Protection. Kure Beach's policies on Resource
Protection, including Areas
of Environmental Concern and
fragile
areas were found
to be generally effective and
overall
well implemented.
It was found that certain
policies
could be updated
and or strengthened to enhance
their coverage and intent. Such policies included beach
management and shoreline erosion, stormwater runoff, and
solid waste disposal (see Section 6.1).
' • Resource Production and Management. Town policies in this
category were likewise found to be generally effective,
well implemented policies. Policies were updated and
clarified for this plan (see Section 6.2) .
• Provision of Services. Most of the policies of the 1985
' Plan on the Provision of Services were found to be
1
2-12

effective and well implemented, especially beach access
improvements. The Town achieved all of its goals in
developing all its public accessways, and has now developed
a new policy towards maintaining its beach access
facilities. The policy on transportation, though precise
and well intended, was not carried through to completion.
There are several goals involved under this policy, none of
which can be achieved in a short period of time due to
necessary state and federal involvement. The Town
continues to
discuss and work toward
its
transportation
goals. These
goals have been redefined
and
updated in this
Plan Update
(see
Section 6.3.6) . The 1985 policies on
Town
facilities
and
provision of public water supply have
been
realized:
a new
Town Hall and elevated water storage
tank
are soon to be constructed.
• Economic
and Community Development.
Policies on
development
within the community were
found
to be effective
and overall well implemented. The policies have been
detailed
and reworded to
clarify the Town's
intent
and
desires
(Section 6.3).
In addition, the
need
was
recognized to formulate policies regarding potential
development in the Fort Fisher Military Base and Sunny
Point Buffer Zone adjacent to the Town limits (see Section
6.3.5) .
• Storm Hazard Mitigation, Evacuation and Post Disaster
Recovery Plan. Kure Beach's plan and policies are integral
and incorporated into the New Hanover County Storm Hazard
2-13

Mitigation, Evacuation, and Post Disaster Recovery Plan.
This plan and the policies are currently under review and
update by the New Hanover County Emergency and Disaster
Preparedness Office. The Plan is considered effective and
the Town stands ready to implement active procedures. In
addition, the need was recognized to develop a policy
regarding the state and federal role in restoring and or
keeping US 421 passable in the event of erosion and or
storm drainage.
• Continuing Citizen Participation. The 1985 policy on
' public participation was found to be effective through the
1985 plan update process. The policy whereby the Town
should continue review the policies of the Plan was not
implemented to a significantly beneficial degree.
Throughout this Plan Update process, the extreme importance
of public participation in land use planning matters and
the need to continuously review the Land Use Plan in
conjunction with the Town's other ordinances has been
stressed. Policies in this plan have been developed to
emphasize these points and encourage action (see Sections
6.3.1 and 6.5).
2-14

1 SECTION 3: CONSTRAINTS; LAND SUITABILITY
IDevelopment in a community such as Kure Beach is of ten
' limited by constraints, factors which preclude or place
restrictions on development opportunities. For the purpose of
' this plan, constraints to development are placed into two general
categories: natural limitations - land suitability and, the
capacity of community facilities. Various constraints falling
'
into each category and implications towards development are
discussed in the following sections.
3.1 Physical Limitations for Development
3.1.1 Soil Limitations
'
The general pattern of soil types in the Kure Beach area is
shown on Map 3 .1 .1. Soils are typical of those f ound on the
developed barrier islands in this part of the state and they are
fully described in the New Hanover County Soil Survey, published
USDA Soil Conservation Service. A
by and available through the
'
brief discussion of the soils found within Kure Beach's town
limits and development uses follows. Table 3.1.1 lists physical
'
limitations of area soils along with some physical properties
important when considering development.
Soil conditions for septic tank suitability is not a
limitation for Kure Beach since the Town operates on a central
sewer system for wastewater treatment and disposal.
'
The predominant soil found in Kure Beach is Urban land (Ur) .
Urban land consists of areas where the original soil has been
'
3-1

CA PE
W-a
A
T C AN
Nh KuRE BE
T� C
EA Al
LEGEND
THE PREPARATION OF THIS NAP
WAS FINANCED IN PART THROUGH A GRANT
JO -
JOHNSTON SOILS
PROVIDED BY 111E NORTH CAROLINA.
COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM THROUGH
FUNDS PROVIDED BY THE COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1972, AS AMENDED,
Kr-
KUREB SANV
WHICH IS ADMINISTERED BY THE
OFFICE OF OCEAN AND COASTAL RESOURCE
La -
LEON SAND
MANAGEMENT, N.O.A.A.
C
LY -
LYNN HAYeN FIIJE SAND
Nh-
NEWHAN FUJE SAND
�O�N
Krq-
RIMINI SAND
Trl-
TIDAL MARSH
NEW H
ur -
UR6AN LANp
1990 LA
WA-
WAKULLA SAND
n
HENRYW
MOT To SC,AL.E

M = M M
TABLE 3.1.1
SOIL PROPERTIES AND LIMITATIONS TO DEVELOPMENT
KURE BEACH, NORTH CAROLINA
I Physical Properties ( Limitations
I I I i I
I I Depth to I I I I I
Soil Name I Flooding I High Water [Permeability ( I Streets & I Sanitary I Sewage Lagoon
& Map Symbol I Frequency*1 Table (Ft) I(In /Hr ] I Buildings I Roadways I Landfill I Area
I I I I I I I
Johnston JO I Frequent [ 1 ft. above) 6 — 20.0 [ Severe (floods, [ Severe (floods, I Severe (floods, [ Severe (floods,
[ ( surface to [ [ wetness) ( wetness) [ wetness) [ wetness)
11.5 ft. I I I I
1 I I I I I I
Kureb Kr [ None [ >6.0 [ 6 — 20.0 I Slight [ Slight I Severe (seepage) [ Severe (seepage)
I i I I
Leon Le ( None [ 0 — 1.0 [ 6 — >20.0 I Severe (wetness) [ Severe (wetness) [ Severe (seepage) ( Severe (seepage,
I I I i I I I wetness)
I I I I I I I
Lynnhaven Ly [ Frequent [ 0 — 1.0 [ 6 — >20.0 [ Severe (wetness) [ Severe (wetness) [ Severe (seepage) [ Severe (seepage,
I I I I I I I wetness)
I I I I I I I
Newhan Nh [ (Tides) [ >6.0 [ >20.0 ( Slight I Slight [ Severe (seepage) [ Severe (seepage)
1 I I I I I I
Rimini Rn I None [ >6.0 [ >20.0 [ Slight I Slight [ Severe (seepage) [ Severe (seepage)
I I I I I I I
Tidal Marsh [ (Tides) [ ( 2 — 20.0 I Severe (wetness, [ Severe (wetness, [ Severe (wetness [ Severe (wetness,
TM ( [ [ [ floods) ( floods) [ floods) [ floods)
I I I I I I I
Wakulla We [ None [ >6.0 [ 6 — 20.0 [ Slight [ Slight [ Severe (seepage) [ Severe (seepage)
I I I I I I I
Source: New Hanover County Soil Survey, USDA—SCS.
Note: The soil survey also incudes several other tables, describing soil suitability for various purposes ranging from woodland
management to recreational uses.
*Flooding of soils due to tides and runoff. Doesn't include ponding or storm surges.

cut, filled, graded, or paved to the extent that the original
soil series is not recognized. Most of Kure Beach has been cut,
filled, graded and or paved to facilitate development. Urban
' land can be used for most development structures, including
shopping centers, municipal facilities, and factories as well as
' the residential and commercial uses found at Kure Beach. It is
not listed in the Soil Survey's tables.
The Leon sand (Le) and Lynn Haven fine sand (Ly) are nearly
level, poorly drained soils. Native vegetation includes longleaf
pine, wateroak and pine three -awn. This soil occurs in the
' undeveloped and residential outskirt areas of the Town.
Permeability is rapid and seasonal high water table is the main
' limitation in the use and management of these soils. The Rimini
'
sand is an excessively drained soil typically used for
residential and
industrial sites. Longleaf pine, turkey oak,
dwarf myrtle,
and huckleberry describe the native vegetation.
Permeability is
moderate, and droughtiness and leaching of soil
nutrients being
the primary limitations in managing this soil.
'
The Newhan
fine sand is found primarily along the oceanfront
at Kure Beach,
forming the dunes and beach. This soil is
'
excessively drained with very rapid permeability, these being the
'
primary factors
limiting its use and management.
3.1.2 Water Supply
Kure Beach presently obtains its water supply through its own
municipal system. This arrangement is expected to continue into
the future. Additional wells and/or storage tanks may be
n
1
3-2

necessary
should
large areas of
presently vacant land become
developed,
as has
the "Kure Beach
Club" tract, for example.
The primary source of water in the area is the groundwater
contained in the Castle Hayne Formation Aquifer. Wells drilled
into this thick confined aquifer are now substantially
productive. Water levels in aquifers have been steadily
declining from over production all along the coast of North
Carolina, however, and salt water intrusion is a real potential
threat, especially along the immediate coast.
There are no groundwater recharge areas or public supply
water sheds within the Town of Kure Beach.
3.2 Fragile Areas
"Fragile areas" near the coast are those areas which could
easily be damaged or destroyed by inappropriate or poorly planned
development. Included are coastal wetlands, sand dunes, ocean
beaches and shorelines, estuarine waters and shorelines, public
trust waters, complex natural areas, areas sustaining remnant
species, unique geologic formations, national landmarks, wooded
swamps, prime wildlife habitats, scenic points, archaeological,
cultural, and historical sites, pocosins, maritime forests,
Outstanding Resource Waters, shellfish waters, and wetlands
regulated by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Being situated
entirely, on a barrier island, Kure Beach contains fragile areas
associated with the coastal environment: tidal wetlands, the
ocean and estuarine areas, dunes, natural areas, and the public
trust waters.
3-3

1
Some fragile areas have been designated by the State of North
Carolina as being critical resource areas; environmentally
significant and vulnerable to damage and destruction by
development. These "Areas of Environmental Concern" or "AEC's",
are described in the paragraphs which follow.
The fragile areas in the Kure Beach area are located on Map
4. Of primary importance within the Town limits are the ocean
area fragile areas and areas of environmental concern. Special
consideration and conscientious planning must take place
regarding preservation and non -disturbance of these fragile
areas. The State of North Carolina recognizes several points of
historic, architectural, and archaeological significance within
the Kure Beach area. These are listed below and their locations
are shown on Map 4.
Historical/Architectural Structures:
Fort Fisher State Historic Site (South of Kure Beach)
Gull Cottages, North Fort Fisher Boulevard
Pier View Cottages, "K" Avenue
Hammill Cottage, South Fort Fisher Boulevard
Kure Beach Pier, Oceanfront at "K" Avenue
Archaeological Sites:
31NH376 "I" and 5th Avenues
31NH377 "K" and 8th Avenues
31NH397 West of "G" Avenue
31NH444 Dow Road Bend
Riverfront Sensitive Areas
3-4

There is also the Union Soldier's Landmark at Fort Fisher
Boulevard and "K" Avenue.
Policies of the Town of Kure Beach regarding land use in and
adjacent to these sensitive areas are outlined in Section 6.1.3
of this document.
3.2.1 Areas of Environmental Concern
The North Carolina Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA)
recognizes the value and environmental sensitivity of coastal
resources, and the need for their protection. The local land use
plan, the identification of these resources as areas of
environmental concern (AECs) and the regulation of land use and
development within these areas are means by which LAMA works to
avoid the destruction of these critical resource fragile areas.
There are four broad categories of AECs; estuarine systems,
ocean hazard areas systems, public water supplies, and natural
and cultural resource areas. Of primary significance to Kure
Beach are the ocean hazard areas systems. There are no public
water supply or natural and cultural resource areas within the
Town of Kure Beach.
3.2.1.1 Estuarine System AECs
There are four (4) component AECs within the estuarine
system; the Coastal Wetlands, Estuarine Waters, Estuarine
Shoreline, and Public Trust Waters. Each is discussed below:
• Coastal Wetland AEC. The Town of Kure Beach has estuarine
wetland areas along the Cape Fear. River. These tidal
marshlands serve as a critical component in the coastal
ecosystem. The marsh is the basis for the high net yield
3-5

11
1
1
0
system of the estuary through the production of organic
detritus (partially decomposed plant material) which is the
primary input source for the food chain of the entire
estuarine system. Estuarine dependent species of fish and
shellfish make up over 90 percent of the total value of
North Carolina's commercial catch.
The roots and rhizomes and seeds of marsh grasses
serve as food for waterfowl, and the stems as wildlife
nesting material. Tidal marsh also serves as the first
line of defense in retarding shoreline erosion. The plant
stems and leaves tend to dissipate wave action while the
vast network of roots resist soils erosion. Coastal
wetlands operate additionally as traps for sediments,
nutrients and pollutants originating from upland runoff.
Siltation of the estuarine bottom is reduced, and
pollutants and excess nutrients absorbed by plants do not
burden the coastal waters.
These marshes should be considered unsuitable for all
development and for those land uses which will alter their
natural functions. Inappropriate land uses include, but
are not limited to the following examples: restaurants and
businesses; residences, apartments, motels, hotels, and
trailer parks; parking lots and offices; spoil and dump
sites; wastewater lagoons; public and private roads and
highways; and factories. Examples of acceptable land uses
may include utility easements, fishing piers, docks, and
certain agricultural uses, except when excavation or
' 3-6

filling affecting estuarine or navigable waters is
involved.
• Estuarine Waters AEC. The Cape Fear River is part of the
State's estuarine system. Estuaries are among the most
productive natural environments of North Carolina, and they
support valuable commercial navigation, recreation, and
aesthetic purposes. These waters are also known as
"Coastal" or "Joint" waters pursuant to an agreement
between the Wildlife Resources and Marine Fisheries
Commissions.
The immense productivity of estuary waters results
largely from unique circulation patterns, nutrient trapping
mechanisms, and the protective habitats it provides.
Estuarine circulation, influenced by tidal currents, fresh
water influx, and bottom depth, keeps the estuarine waters
well flushed and disperses nutrients, juvenile stages, and
wastes. The high level of commercial and sports fisheries
and the aesthetic appeal of coastal North Carolina is
dependent upon the conservation of and protection of
sustained quality in its estuarine areas.
Appropriate uses in and around estuarine waters are
those which preserve the estuarine waters so to safeguard
and perpetuate their biological, economic and aesthetic
values. Highest priority is to be allocated to the
conservation of estuarine waters.
Second priority may be given to water dependent uses
such as navigable channels, piers and docks, and mooring
3-7

H
1
L
pilings, provided that they do not directly or indirectly
block or impair existing navigation channels, increase
shoreline erosion, deposit spoils below mean high tide,
cause adverse water circulation patterns, violate water
quality standards or cause degradation of shellfish waters.
• Public Trust Areas AEC.. The State of North Carolina
supports the traditional public rights of access to, and
use of, lands and waters designated as Public Trust Areas
for purposes including navigation, fishing, and recreation.
These areas support valuable commercial and sports
fisheries, have aesthetic value, and are important
resources for economic development.
Included in the Public Trust areas definition are all
waters of the Atlantic Ocean and the lands thereunder from
the mean high water mark to the seaward limit of state
jurisdiction, all natural bodies of water subject to
measurable lunar tides and lands thereunder to the mean
high water mark, all navigable natural bodies of water and
lands thereunder to the mean high water mark or ordinary
high water mark as the case may be, except privately owned
lakes to which the public has no right of access, all
waters in artificially created bodies of water in which
exists significant public fishing resources or other public
resources, which are accessible to the public by navigation
from bodies of water in which the public has no rights of
navigation, all waters in artificially created bodies of
3-8

water in which the public has acquired rights by
prescription, custom, usage, dedication or any other means.
The State allows appropriate private development
within Public Trust Areas, provided the development is not
detrimental to the environment or to public access and
navigation channels, piers, marinas, and bulkheads to
control erosion are examples of uses which may be found
acceptable.
• Estuarine Shoreline AECs. The length of the sound side of
the island in and adjacent to Kure Beach is considered to
be part of the estuarine shoreline component of the
estuarine system AECs. Estuarine shorelines, although
characterized as dry land, and thus potentially
"developable", are considered a component of the estuarine
system because of the close association with adjacent
estuarine waters. Contiguous to the Estuarine Waters AEC,
estuarine shorelines are those non -ocean shorelines which
are especially vulnerable to erosion, flooding, or other
adverse effects of wind and water, and they are intimately
connected to the estuary. The estuarine shoreline AEC area
extends landward a distance of 75 feet from the mean high
water level or normal water level along the estuaries,
sounds, bays, and brackish waters of the estuary.
Because development within the estuarine shoreline
AEC can harm the marshlands and estuarine waters, and
because of the inherent dynamic and hazardous nature of
coastal shorelines, specific restrictions limitations, and
3-9

standards have been adopted by the State for construction
in these areas as outlined in NCAC T1507H.0209. A CAMA
' (Coastal Area Management Act) permit must also be obtained.
By regulation all projects cannot weaken natural barriers
to erosion, shall have limited impervious surfaces, and
shall take measures to prevent pollution of the estuary by
sedimentation and runoff.
3.2.1.2 Ocean Hazard Areas
Ocean Hazard Areas of Environmental Concern are areas along
the Atlantic Ocean which are especially vulnerable to erosion and
other effects of wind, waves, and water. On the unstable sands
that form the island and its oceanfront, uncontrolled and/or
incompatible development can unreasonably endanger life and
property. Improper development can also disturb the natural
barrier island dynamics and sediment transport, and can interfere
rwith the beach's natural defenses against erosion. Three (3)
Areas of Environmental Concern comprise the Ocean Hazard Areas in
Kure Beach, the Ocean Erodible Area, High Hazard Flood Area, and
the Unvegetated Beach Area. The presence of these AECs in Kure
Beach are shown on Map 4. All of these AECs are important to
Kure Beach, as most of its oceanfront and backshore are
' continuing to be developed. Each of these AECs is discussed
below.
• Ocean Erodible AEC. The ocean erodible area is the portion
of the island where there exists a substantial possibility
of excessive erosion and significant shoreline fluctuation.
3-10

A
This area includes the ocean beaches and the frontal dune
system.
Ocean erodible areas are extremely dynamic lands
highly susceptible to becoming displaced by the ocean due
to erosion, storms, and sea level rise. The sand deposits
of ocean beaches and shorelines represent a dynamic zone
which does not afford long term protection for development.
The nature of tidal action and the force of storms is such
that they cause the beach areas to constantly shif t. I
Littoral drift is a natural phenomenon whereby sand is
removed from beaches by wave action and littoral currents
and is deposited upon a different stretch of the beach.
Development within this dynamic zone may result in
loss of property and possible loss of life. The major
objective is to avoid unnecessary hazards to life or
property and to maintain reasonable requirements for public '
expenditures to protect property or maintain safe
conditions. This area must be preserved to the greatest 11,
extent feasible with opportunity to enjoy the physical,
aesthetic, cultural and recreational qualities of the
natural ocean beaches of the State. Appropriate
development within the area must be that which will '
withstand the prevalent natural forces, comply with CAMA
and other state requirements, and not unreasonably
interfere with the rightful use and enjoyment of the beach
area,
3-11

Kure Beach's central commercial district is located
directly adjacent to a bul kheaded length of oceanfront.
Certain sections have been continuously bulkheaded since
the 1940's. Geographical and development patterns and
zoning have kept most commercial development in this
"downtown" area. The ocean hazard setbacks based on the
State standards used for commercial structures of 5,000
square feet or more and for residential structures of four
units or more have had a negative effect on the economic
viability of Kure Beach's oceanfront business district.
Many of the structures in this district are located in
areas subject to these setbacks, and are old and/or in need
of major rehabilitation. Kure Beach has no "50 Percent
Rule". Expansion and new construction of uses permitted or
encouraged by the Kure Beach Zoning Ordinance are not
'
possible
at many of
these locations under conditions
imposed by
the present
setbacks.
• High Hazard Flood AEC. This is the area of coast subject
to high velocity flood waters, including washover and storm
surge, during severe storms. The Federal Insurance
Administration identifies these zones for a "100 year"
storm as "Zone V" on the flood insurance rate maps (see Map
j
4) .
• Unvegetated Beach AEC. These areas are fragile, unstable
and unpredictable areas of the island. They are subject to
rapid changes from wind and wave action. They include the
vast sand reaches often found near inlets and undeveloped
3-12

beach strands where houses have not already been built on
them.
3.3 Areas With Resource Potential
By definition of LAMA, Areas with Resource Potential include
productive and unique agricultural lands; potentially valuable
mineral sites; publicly owned forests, parks, fish and gamelands,
and other non -intensive outdoor recreation lands; privately owned
wildlife sanctuaries.
In Kure Beach, the large tracts of undeveloped property may
be considered Areas with Resource Potential. Vacant lands
(including the Sunny Point Buffer Zone) , consist of expanses of
island dune forests which could become valuable as parks or
natural areas, or even reserves for coastal and estuarine
wildlife of the barrier island system.
3-13

ISECTION 4: CONSTRAINTS; CARRYING CAPACITY ANALYSIS
r4.1 Community Facilities
Community facilities are an important factor in land use
planning because of the integral relationship they have with
development.- The growth of a community is largely dependent on
the facilities it provides. The locations of Kure Beach's
jcommunity facilities are shown on Map 3, and the following
sections describe the community facilities and services provided
by the Town.
4.2 Water Supply System
Potable water is supplied in Kure Beach through a municipal
system which taps the Tertiary Castle Hayne aquifer. There are
presently six. (6) wells in operation in Kure Beach and one (1)
' additional well for emergency use only. The six (6) wells have a
pumping capacity of 702,000 gpd (gallons per day) and the
#
emergency
well has
an additional 126,000 gpd.
The location of
these wells is shown on Map 3. Well depth of active wells
ranges
from 158
to 202
feet. The Town does not
operate a
water
treatment
plant. Water is chlorinated at the
well and
pumped
directly
into the
system. The Town has a new 300,000
gallon
elevated
storage
tank (and plans to remove
the older
75,000
gallon tank). The past year's water usage records indicate that
the yearly average flow was 161,830 gpd (23 percent of capacity)
and that the summer average flaw was 275,100 gpd (39 percent of
capacity). -This rate of 275,100 gpd falls within the Town's
4-1

300,000 gallon storage capacity, thus meeting the State storage
requirements of one day's use.
It is expected that the water supply will be adequate to meet
the demands of Kure Beach for the next several years, although
the Town may eventually have to further increase its elevated or
ground
storage capacity.
However,
potential threat to
water
supply
is the intrusion of
salt water
into the groundwater
due to
over pumping. This could particularly affect Kure Beach should
Kure Beach and or the neighboring community of Carolina Beach
continue growth at rapid rates and or to excessive population
levels. Furthermore, overpumping of the Castle Hayne aquifer
statewide has resulted in a steady decline in water levels in the
aquifer. It must be noted that this general decline in the water
level of the primary supplying aquifer may eventually make water
conservation necessary.
4.3 Wastewater Treatment and Disposal
The Kure Beach sewer system extends to all developed areas
within the town limits. All residents and businesses are
required to connect to the system. From the sewer collection
lines, wastewater flows on Kure Beach are directed to the
Carolina Beach wastewater treatment facility plant for wastewater
treatment and disposal. The Carolina Beach Wastewater Treatment
Plant is a regional facility with a capacity of 1.85 million
gallons per day (MGD) . Kure Beach has paid for a percentage of
the plant's capital cost and pays a percentage of operating costs
that depends on their usage.
4-2
Kure Beach's present flow I

allocation to the plant is 450,150 000 gallons per day (gpd) .
The 1990 yearly average flow was 213,800 (39 percent of capacity)
and the summer peak average monthly flow was 323,500 gpd (59
Ipercent of capacity). Treated wastewater effluent is discharged
to the lower Cape Fear River estuary.
The Town of Kure Beach has reactivated a 100,000 gpd sewerage
treatment lagoon in the buffer zone off K Avenue to accommodate
Kure Beach Club's need for wastewater treatment as a new
subdivision development. The existing treatment plant here is
not in operation at this time. The Town is presently
investigating the possibility of upgrading and expanding the
entire facility to operate at a capacity of 285,000 gpd.
The Town's wastewater treatment needs should not present any
significant constraint to development, provided that (a) the Town
of Carolina Beach continues to accept waste flows (450,150 gpd
now allocated plus percentage of any plant expansions) from Kure
Beach at its regional treatment plant, and (b) the Town's
treatment facility located in the' buffer zone is upgraded or
Iexpanded.
4.4 Solid Waste Disposal
The Town of Kure Beach is presently responsible for the
collection and removal of solid waste fran the island. New
Hanover County provides several solid waste disposal facilities
on the mainland including an incinerator and a modern "high tech"
landfill. The landfill has not reached its capacity and remains
open. The County is currently working to increase the
1 4-3

incinerator system capacity to reduce solid waste volume and meet
increasing demands. The County expects these efforts will be
sufficient for 50 to 75 years.
In October 1989, the State legislature passed Senate Bill 111
towards the more effective management of solid waste. Staged
over a period of several years, the Bill ' s implementation
schedule, included in Appendix C of this Plan, includes recycling
and bans on tires, various plastics, and foam containers in
landfills. Town and County cooperation will be necessary to meet
the requirements of this Bill.
4.5 Transportation Facilities
The major roads in the Town of Kure Beach are Fort Fisher
Boulevard (US 421) , which runs north -south most the length of
Pleasure Island, and Dow Road, which links the Town to the north
via the interior of the Island. Several paved and some unpaved
streets run parallel and perpendicular to US 421, extending to
non -oceanfront houses. During the tourist season, lack of
parking availability and traffic congestion downtown and along
U.S. Highway 421 are common occurrences.
The many
military,
historic
and
recreational
facilities to
the south of
Kure Beach
contribute
to
traffic along
US 421, North
Carolina National Guard/Fort Fisher Air Force Base, the Fort
Fisher/Southport Ferry, the Wildlife Resources Commission Boat
Ramp, Fort Fisher Museum, public beach access areas, North
Carolina Water Resources Center (Aquarium), and the Fort Fisher
4-4

recreational and picnic areas. Visitors to these areas must all
pass through Kure Beach on U.S. 421 or via Dow Road.
Past and recent traffic counts in Kure Beach are listed in
Table 4.5. On many summer weekends, US 421 is utilized beyond
its capacity.
Any excessive growth of the Town of Kure Beach would place
considerable stress on the transportation routes through town.
Particularly during the summer tourist season, additional traffic
volume entering and exiting along Fort Fisher Boulevard (US 421)
would cause undesired congestion through the town. An increase
in traffic along now quiet side streets would also occur as
motorists seek alternate routes to avoid or sideskirt the main
highway. The need for easing traffic congestion along heavily
traveled U.S.. Highway 421' by developing an alternative route (s)
will become greater from the standpoint of both safety and
convenience. This can be accomplished by the proposed Dow Road
extension and/or designating Dow Road as U.S. 421-Alternate (see
Section 6.36) .
4.6 Fire Protection, Police Protection, and Medical Service
Fire protection and firefighting services for Kure Beach are
provided by the Kure Beach Volunteer Fire Department. The Town
fire department maintains equipment capable of extinguishing
fires in structures 35 feet in height or less. For this reason,
and to maintain the quiet family residential atmosphere, the Town
has a 35-foot building height limitation. The Town does maintain
mutual assistance agreements with the Town of Carolina Beach. The
1 4-5

t
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
TABLE 4.5
KURE BEACH TRAFFIC COUNTS
(VEHICLES PER DAY)
Location 1980 1985 1990
US 421/Dow Road
Intersection - North Side 1,300 5,100 7,500
US 421/1541 Intersection -
South Side 11800 4,000 5,000
Source: NC Department of Transportation.

Kure Beach police department is housed in Town Hall. The New
Hanover County Sheriff's Department is also available to assist
the Town. Both police and fire protection are adequate to meet
present needs.
The medical facilities closest to Kure Beach include
physician's offices in neighboring Carolina Beach and those in
the Wilmington area, about 20 miles to the north. New Hanover
County Memorial Hospital and Cape Fear Memorial Hospital are both
located in Wilmington. Adequate Emergency Medical Services
(ambulances) are available to Kure Beach through New Hanover
County's Pleasure Island Rescue Squad.
4.7 Educational Facilities
Children who live on Kure Beach who attend public school
attend Carolina Beach Elementary School (+12 percent over
capacity) and go to high school in Wilmington (+95 - 114 percent
capacity). Wilmington also has several private institutions,
technical colleges, and the University of North Carolina's
IWilmington campus.
4.8 Recreational Facilities
Most recreational activity in Kure Beach is centered around
' the beach and the fishing pier. Over 80 parking spaces along K
i Street and Atlantic Avenue provide access to the beach, the pier,
and the commercial areas. Public beach accessways located at
Istreet end rights -of -way also provide parking.
1 4-6

Recreational facilities for the Town's use also include over
20 acres leased within the Sunny Point Buffer Zone. Tennis and
basketball courts here are maintained by the Town. Because the
area serves as a blast zone for the Sunny Point Military Ocean
Terminal on the west side of the Cape Fear River, certain
recreational activities are not allowed in this area. They
include: overnight camping, activities involving more than 25
persons (per city block) at any one time, and activities
requiring the construction of any habitable or fixed permanent
structures. These restrictions are all in the interests of
public safety..
4.9 Man Made Hazards
Man made hazards in the general vicinity of Kure Beach are
the Sunny Point Military Ocean Terminal Buffer Zone, and the
Carolina Power & Light Company Nuclear Power Plant located in
Southport, North carolina. While they do present some inevitable
risks, neither of these areas impose daily hazards to the
residents of Kure Beach, and their existence is not a hindrance
to development on the Town.
4-7

ISECTION 5: ESTIMATED DEMAND
5.1 Population and Economy
It is anticipated that property will continue to be developed
in Kure Beach because of its overall desirability. The number of
dwellings will.increase and the population and number of seasonal
visitors are expected to increase as well. Table 5.1.1 provides
historical population growth trends over the past several years
at Kure Beach. Over the period 1980 to 1990, Kure Beach grew
from 611 to 929 permanent residents and from 5,179 to 8,320
estimated seasonal residents.
Population projections are made based on historic and recent
trends -and other pertinent information, such as the amount of
potentially developable property at Kure Beach. Population
projections are an important means by which the community can
anticipate and then plan responsibly for future growth, and the
attendant community needs and services. Population projections
for Kure Beach to the year 2010 are given in Table 5.1.2 and
displayed graphically in Figure 5.1.1.
In addition to the standard projections noted above, an
additional planning exercise was undertaken as a part of the
current land use planning effort. An attempt was made to project
the ultimate carrying capacity of the Town at buildout based on
the current densities as dictated by the existing zoning
ordinance. The purpose of this exercise was not to project an
actual maximum population, but simply. to develop a scenario of
what could occur, should existing trends continue. The end
5-1

M .M oft m m� m w an m= r m m an qw.M fm r
4,000 li
3,000
3,000
20,000
15,000 2,000
2,000
10,000
5,000
1,000
1,000
o
i- o
J a-�
Z ►-1
F-
C7
W I--
ONE_
¢¢0=
a.
W O
O O Z
W O
NG.
Z=
da
FIGURE 5.1.1
POPULATION COUNTS AND FUTURE PROJECTIONS
KURE BEACH, NORTH CAROLINA
(1970 - 2010)
�■�Seasonal Population
uuuunuNo_ of Housing Units
A m m m aPermanent Population

t
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
Year
Permanent
Residents
1970
394
1980
611
1985
852
1990
929
TABLE 5.1.1
POPULATION GROWTH
KURE BEACH, NORTH CAROLINA
(1970 - 1988)
Seasonal
Pouulation
4,320
5,1791. /
5,608
8,320
Total
Population
4,714
6,755
7,774
9,249
Number Of
Housina Units
622
1,055
1,272
1,488
% Increase
1970-1990 116% 92% 96% 139%
% Increase
1980-1990 52% 60% 37% 41%
Data Sources: Kure Beach 1970 Land Use Plan
Kure Beach 1985 Land Use Plan Update
North Carolina Municipal Population. N.C. Office
of State Budget and Management, October 1988,
January, 1990
New Hanover County 1986 Land Use Plan Update
Henry von Oesen and Associates, Inc.
Notes: l./ Interpolated estimate using earlier and later data as
basis for estimate.

TABLE 5.1.2
FUTURE POPULATION ESTIMATES
KURE BEACH, NORTH CAROLINA
(1995 - 2010)
Permanent
Seasonal
Total
Number of
IYear
Residents
Residents
Population
Houses
1995
1,200
10,200
11,400
1,782
1
2000
1,450
12,800
14,250
2,226
2005
1,800
14,400
16,200
2,530
2010
2,000
16,000
18,000
2,800
n r
Sources: New Hanover County Land Use Plan
North Carolina Office of State Budget and Management
Henry von Oesen and Associates, Inc.
Notes: Future population estimates were based on historical
trends (approximate increase of five percent per year),
and the approximate ratio of seasonal to permanent
residents. They also take into account Kure Beach's
growing popularity as a choice for permanent residency as
well as for seasonal residencey and summer visits.
Housing estimates consider a full year round average of
6.4 persons per residence.
1

results of such an exercise often prove to be a bit frightening,
but it is useful to stimulate the need for further thought and
' planning on certain key issues, namely:
• Need to spell out the maximum densities allowed for each
zoning category in the zoning ordinance.
• Need to investigate reducing allowable densities.
• Use of greenspace requirements to control density of
development.
Three potential growth scenarios were developed:
• Scenario A: High Level (assumes minimal level of control
on future growth and development densities)
• Scenario B: Moderate Level (assumes moderate level of
control on future growth and development densities)
• Scenario C: Low Level (assumes maximum level of control on
future growth and development densities)
The next step was to generate maximum density projections for
the Town under each scenario. These are shown in Table 5.1.3.
The Town of Kure Beach has decided to accept Scenario B
(Moderate Control) as a goal to guide decision -making relative to
densities of future development. Actual future population growth
in Kure Beach will be limited by the land space available for
housing construction along with the ability of the Town to supply
the needs for parking, public services and community facilities.
' Also involved is how fast the Town itself desires and/or allows
itself to grow. Specific constraints to development are discussed
in Section 4.
1 5-2

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
TABLE 5.1.3
MAXIMUM DENSITY PROJECTIONS
Scenario A Scenario B Scenario C
Housing Density
Single Family 9u/acre* 6u/acre
Multi -Family 18u/acre 9u/acre
Potential Population
Permanent 2,634 2,163
Seasonal 23,037 17,147
Total 25,671 19,310
Maximum Average Population Density
52 per/acre* 39 per/acre 27 per/acre
Notes:
*u/acre = units per acre
per/acre = persons per acre
2u/acre
4u/acre
1,719
11,591
13,310

5.1.1 Local objectives for Growth and Development
As reflected in the policy statements and implementation
strategies contained within this plan, it is the desire of the
Town of Kure Beach to remain a quiet, family oriented beach
community of primarily single family residences with limited to
moderate commercial development. This desire was emphasized by
the public through their comments and responses to the Citizen
Survey Questionnaire (see Appendix A). The Town will strive to
maintain these ideals while allowing for growth through prudent
planning and growth management.
5.2 Future Land Need
Conceivably, Kure Beach will continue to develop as a family
oriented, residential community with small accommodating
businesses, until all "buildable" areas are developed. There are
presently many vacant properties and new subdivision lots
available to buy or rent for those seeking a place at Kure Beach;
sufficient to meet the projected demand. The Town could
eventually expand into the military held areas adjacent to it for
low density, low -intensity land uses if the opportunity presented
itself. It is unlikely the Town will expand its southern limits
into the Fort Fisher Historic Area.
5.3 Community Facilities Demand
It is expected that the water supply will be adequate to meet
the demands of Kure Beach for the next several decades, although
1 5-3

the Town may eventually have to further increase its elevated or
ground storage capacity (Section 4).
The Town now has a potential wastewater treatment and
disposal capacity of 735,150 gpd including the allocated capacity
in the Carolina Beach facility and the proposed Kure Beach lagoon
system. This should be sufficient to accommodate the Town well
through to the year 2010.
The solution for easing traffic congestion along U.S. Highway
421 will have to be addressed in the near future.
5-4

SECTION 6:
LAND USE POLICIES - INDEX
Page
'
6.1
Resource
Protection
6-1
6.1.1
Areas of Environmental Concern
6-1
6.1.2
The Estuarine System
6-1
6.1.3
Ocean Hazard Areas
6-4
6.1.4
Stormwater Runoff
6-8
6.1.5
6.1.6
Beach Management and Shoreline Erosion
All Marinas, Floating Homes, Sound and
6-9
Estuarine Islands
6-11
6.1.7
Potable Water
6-11
6.1.8
Rising Sea Level
6-11
6.1.9
Shoreline Structures
6-11
6.1.10
Wastewater Treatment and Disposal
6-12
6.1.11
Solid Waste Disposal
6-13
6.1.12
Storm Drainage
6-13
6.1.13
Man -Made Hazards
6-13
6.1.14
Industrial Impacts on 'Fragile Areas
6-14
6.2
Resource
Production and Management
6-14
6.2.1
Tourism - Ocean Waters and Beaches
6-14
6.2.2
Commercial and Recreational Fisheries
6-14
6.2.3
Dredging Activities
6-15
6.2.4
Productivity
6-15
6.3
Economic
Growth and Community Development
6-16
6.3.1
Land Use Issues
6-16
6.3.2
Central Business District
6-17
6.3.3
Location, Types, and Density of
Development
6-17
6.3.4
Intergovernmental Cooperation
6-17
6.3.5
Fort Fisher Military Base and Sunny
Point Marine Ocean Terminal Zone
6-18
6.3.6
Transportation
6-18
6.3.7
Beach Access and Recreational Facilities
6-19
6.3.8
Commitment to State and Federal Programs
6-19
6.3.9
Energy Facility Siting and Development
6-20
6.3.10
Tourism/Type and Location of Industry
6-20
6.4
Storm
Hazard Mitigation, Evacuation and Post
Disaster
Recovery Plan
6-20
6.4.1 Mitigation 6-21
6.4.2 Evacuation 6-23
6.4.3 Post Disaster Recovery 6-23
6.5 Continuing Public Participation 6-27
6.6 LAMA Policy Issues Not Relevant to Kure Beach 6-27

ISECTION 6: LAND USE POLICIES
' The policies herein reflect the desires of the Town of Kure
Beach. They have been developed in accordance with NCAC T15:07B,
Land Use Planning Guidelines, as revised October 25, 1989.
6.1 Resource Protection
6.1.1 Areas of Environmental Concern
Kure Beach will support and enforce through its CAMA
permitting capacity the State policies and permitted uses in the
Areas of Environmental Concern (AEC's). The State's policy
statements for AEC's offer protection for Kure Beach's fragile
tareas through LAMA permitting procedures. In accordance with
those policies set forth in Subchapter 7H of the North Carolina
Administrative Code, Kure Beach adopts the following policies
concerning AEC's within its jurisdiction.
6.1.2 The Estuarine System
In recognition of the enormous economic, social and
biological values the estuarine system has for North Carolina,
Kure Beach will promote conservation and management of the
' estuarine system as a whole, which includes the individual AEC's:
coastal wetlands, estuarine waters, public trust areas, and
estuarine shorelines.
The management objective for the system shall be to give
highest priority to the protection and coordinated management of
all the elements as an interrelated group of AEC's in order to
safeguard and perpetuate the above stated values, and to minimize
' 6-1

the likelihood of significant loss of private property and public
resources.
Specific policies regarding acceptable and unacceptable uses
within the individual AEC's of the estuarine system are stated
below. In essence, permitted land uses in these areas shall be
those which are water dependent. In all cases the particular
location, use, and design characteristics shall be in accord with
the general use standards for coastal wetlands, estuarine waters,
and public trust areas as stated in 15A NCAC 7H and defined in
Section 4.1 .4 of this plan.
• Coastal Wetlands: Acceptable land uses may include utility
easements, fishing piers, and docks. Unacceptable uses may
include, but would not be limited to, restaurants,
businesses, residbrices, apartments, motels, hotels,
floating homes, parking lots, private roads*, and
highways*.
• Estuarine
Waters:
In
recognition of
the importance of
estuarine
waters for
the
fisheries and
related industries
as well as aesthetics, recreation, and education, Kure
Beach shall promote the conservation and quality of this
resource. Appropriate uses may include simple access
channels, structures which prevent erosion, navigational
channels, boat docks, marinas, piers, and mooring pilings.
*Note: It may be necessary and in the public interest in certain
cases for roads to traverse wetland areas. Where this is
absolutely necessary; state and federal regulations may
allow such with certain safeguards and/or mitigation
measures.
6-2 ,

• Public
Trust Areas:
The State of North
Carolina holds
its
beaches
and waters in
public trust, and
believing that
the
public
has the right
of access to them.
In the absence
of
overriding
public benefit,
any use
which significantly
interferes
with the public
right of
navigation or other
public trust rights which apply in the area shall not be
allowed. Projects which would directly or indirectly block
or impair existing navigational channels increase shoreline
erosion, deposit spoils below mean high tide, cause adverse
water circulation patterns, high tide, violate water
quality standards, or cause degradation of shellfish waters
shall, in general, not be allowed.
Uses that may be allowed in public trust areas shall
not be detrimental to the public trust rights and the
biological and physical functions of the estuary. Examples
of such uses include the development of navigational
channels or drainage ditches, the use of bulkheads to
prevent erosion, the building of piers, docks or marinas.
e Estuarine Shoreline: Suitable land uses within the
estuarine shoreline AEC are those compatible with both the
dynamic nature of estuarine shorelines and the values of
' the estuarine system.
Kure Beach recogniz e's : (1) the close association
between estuarine shorelines and adjacent estuarine waters,
(2) the influence shoreline development has on the quality
of estuarine life, and (3) the damaging processes of
1 6-3

shorefront erosion and flooding to which the estuarine
shoreline is subject.
Residential recreational, and commercial land uses are
all appropriate types of use along the estuarine shoreline,
provided that all standards of NCAC 15 Subchapter 7H
relevant to estuarine shoreline AEC's are met.
6.1.3 Ocean Hazard Areas
In recognition of the critical nature of ocean hazard areas
due to this special vulnerability to erosion and dynamic
processes and their possible danger to life and property because
of natural forces, Kure Beach supports the state policies for
ocean hazard areas in 15 NCAC 7H of the state CAMA regulations.
The ocean hazard area designation for Kure Beach includes the
AEC's of ocean erodible areas and high hazard flood areas.
Suitable land uses in ocean hazard areas generally are those
which eliminate unreasonable danger at life and property, and
which achieve a balance between the financial, safety, and social
factors involved in hazard area development. Ocean shoreline
erosion control activities and dune establishment/stabilization
are acceptable types of land uses. Residential, commercial, and
recreational land uses and parking lots for beach access are also
acceptable types of use in ocean hazard areas provided that:
(1) For small structures such at residences, setback
measurements begin at the first line of stable
vegetation and continue inland to a depth 30 times the
average annual rate of erosion. Provided there has
been no long term erosion or the rate of erosion is
6-4

less than 2 feet per year, this distance is set at 60
feet. For large structures, the setback is 60 times
the average erosion rate or 30 times the erosion rate
plus 105 feet, whichever is less.
2
Development does not involve the removal or relocation
of frontal dune sand or vegetation thereon.
(3 )
Mobile homes are not located within high hazard flood
areas.
(4)
Development is consistent with minimum lot size and
setback requirements established by local regulations.
r(5)
Development implements means and methods to mitigate or
minimize adverse impacts of the project on the
environment.
(6)
Development of growth -inducing public facilities such
as sewers, water lines, roads, bridges, and erosion
control measures occurs only in cases where:
a. National or state interest and public benefits are
'
clearly overriding factors,
b. Facilities would not exacerbate existing hazards or
damage natural buffers,
c. Facilities would be reasonably safe from flood and
erosion related damage,
d. Facilities do not promote growth and development in
ocean hazard areas.
e. Development will not create undue interference with
legal rights to public access and use of such
areas.
1 6-5

(7) Prior to the issuance of any permit for development in
the ocean hazard AEC' s, there shall be a written
acknowledgment from the applicant that he is aware of
the risks associated with development in this area.
(8) Kure Beach supports the Army Corps of Engineers in
their beach renourishment projects that allow approved/
suitable spoil to be taken from the Intracoastal
Waterway River and inlet dredging operations and placed
on designated island beaches.
• Other Natural and Cultural Resource Areas. Uncontrolled or
incompatible development may result in major or
irreversible damage to fragile coastal resource areas which
contain environmental, natural, or cultural resources of
more than local significance. In recognition of this, it
is the policy of Kure Beach to encourage the protection of
such natural systems or cultural resources; scientific,
educational, or associative values; and aesthetic
qualities. Development or activities detrimental to such
areas should not be permitted.
Areas included in this general category are: coastal
complex natural areas, coastal areas that sustain remnant
species, unique coastal geologic formations, pocosins and
404 wetlands, ORW areas, maritime forests, significant
coastal architectural resources, and significant coastal
historic architectural resources. Within the Town and
Sunny Point Buffer Zone there are archaeological sites and
several structures of historic and architectural

significance. Several areas are also found to the south of
Kure Beach (in the Fort Fisher area). Here there are
' resources of great historic value (Fort Fisher),
educational value (aquarium), and natural preservation
(forest, marsh, inlet, etc.) . In accordance with policies
stated in Subchapter 7H of the state CAMA regulations, Kure
Beach supports the protective measures and use standards
described therein.
• 404 Wetlands.
Jurisdictional
wetlands covered under
the
current U.S.
Army Corps of
Engineer's Section
404
regulating program include those areas which meet three
basic criteria: hydric soils type, support predominantly
wetlands plant species (hydophytes) , and exhibit wetlands
hydrology. These conditions are also present for pocosins,
fresh water swamps, and often for maritime shrub forests.
These important natural resource areas provide many
ecological benefits, including aquifer recharge, habitat
for wildlife, remnant species, etc.
There are potentially some areas in Kure Beach which
are considered 404 wetlands which could include these other
' natural resource areas. Kure Beach supports the protective
measures and use standards contained in Subchapter 7H of
' the State CAMA regulations and other State and Federal
regulatory programs which provide preservation and
conservation of these natural resources.
• Water Supply Areas. The Town of Kure Beach receives its
potable water through a municipal system which taps the
1 6-7

Tertiary Castle Hayne aquifer. There are currently six (6)
wells in operation in Kure Beach with a pumping capacity of
702,000 gpd, and one emergency well with a pumping capacity
of 126,000 gpd. The Town has a new 300,000 gallon elevated
storage tank, and they plan to remove the old 75,000 gallon
tank.
The Town of Kure Beach fully supports the protective
measures and uses standards for identified water supply in
accordance with policies stated in Subchapter 7H of the
State CAMA regulations. The Town of Kure Beach discourages
uncontrolled or incompatible development which could
jeopardize or adversely impact identified water supply areas
and recognizes the need to protect these important
resources. The Town also urges all home builders to request
water conservation measures be installed in their homes as
part of their water conservation program.
6.1.4 Stormwater Runoff
Uncontrolled development adjacent to coastal waters can pose
a serious threat to the system through the rapid discharge of
pollutants washed off of impervious surfaces via stormwater.
Stormwater runoff drains via beach outfalls at Kure Beach.
Impervious surfaces include streets, parking lots, driveways, and
rooftops.
The Town of Kure Beach supports North Carolina Stormwater
Control Regulations (effective January 1, 1988). Kure Beach will
review its zoning ordinance limits for lot coverage considering
these regulations. The Town requires a drainage plan review in
6-8

conjunction with new residential development. The Town also
encourages the use of "best management practices" to minimize the
' rapid release of pollutants to coastal waters through stormwater
runoff. Examples of these practices include using pervious or
semi -pervious materials, such as turf stone or gravel for
' driveways and walks, retaining natural vegetation along marsh and
waterfront areas to retain its natural filtering properties, and
allowing stormwater to percolate into the ground rather than
discharging it directly to coastal waters. The Town is currently
in the process of reviewing current drainage in the Town
�. (including beach pipe drainage) , and no optimal methods or
improvements on site by site basis. This review will culminate
in the development of a Town program for drainage improvements.
' 6.1.5 Beach Management and Shoreline Erosion
Kure Beach will consider implementing a comprehensive
strategic plan for shoreline management that produces the most
effective, financially feasible and environmentally acceptable
means of protecting and managing the economic and natural values
of the beach.
The Town of Kure Beach adheres to current CAMA policies
and
'
regulations concerning beach
erosion control, where beach
'
renourishment or retreat are
the preferred alternatives
over
shoreline hardening structures.
Kure Beach will continue to
seek
innovative methods to stabilize
the beach and dune system.
The Town will continue to maintain existing bulkheads
and
groins as necessary within the
context of the CAMA regulations.
Dune maintenance and protection
will be used in conjunction
with
1 6-9

erosion control methods. Off -road vehicles (with the exception
of emergency vehicles and handicap access) are not allowed on the
beach strand at Kure Beach as specified in the terms of the
Town's Off -Road Vehicle Ordinance.
Public pedestrian access is limited to designated dune
crossover access areas. The Town encourages access by dune
crossover at every private access and residence as well.
The Town of Kure Beach supports State and Federal efforts to
maintain navigation channels within its jurisdiction. It
supports all State and Federal efforts to determine, finance and
implement enviromentally and aesthetically acceptable methods of
beach renourishment consistent with locally adopted policies.
The Town of Kure Beach supports and encourages the Army Corps
of Engineers in their studies and efforts regarding implementa-
tion of the 1966 Federally authorized beach renourishment project
for the area including Kure Beach.
It is the policy of the Town of Kure Beach to seek and
encourage state and federal support and commitment to the
maintenance, protection, and repair of US 421 in eventual
incidences of erosion threats and storm damages, including
hurricanes and "northeasters".
Such support and commitment is necessary to insure the safety
of lives, protect the viability of the Town, and to maintain
access to the many military, historic and recreational
facilities located south of Kure Beach on Pleasure Island.
6-10

6.1.6 All Marinas, Floating Homes, Sound and Estuarine Islands
Because of the prohibition on most kinds of development
within the Sunny Point Buffer Zone, these issues are not
applicable to areas within Kure Beach's jurisdiction. Kure Beach
supports dry storage of boats by owners as a practical
alternative.
6.1.7 Potable Water
Because peak water usage has increased and is expected to
continue to increase over the next several years, and because the
potential for .salt water intrusion does exist, Kure Beach has
established a water monitoring program to test for chlorides at
each its well sites. The Town of Kure Beach supports water
conservation efforts.
' 6.1.8 Rising Sea Level
The Town of Kure Beach will closely monitor research on sea
level rise and its effect on coastal areas. It is the policy of
the Town to consider any state and federal policies formulated
prior to issuing specific statements regarding sea level rise and
restriction of development in potentially susceptible locations.
Specifically, development within areas up to 5 feet above sea
' level which may be susceptible to sea level rise and wetland
' loss.
6.1.9 Shoreline Structures
' The Town of Kure Beach urges proper maintenance of existing
groins, bulkheads and seawalls for health, safety and aesthetic
reasons. The Town shall not allow marshes or beach areas to be
damaged by the installation of new bulkheads, groins or seawalls.

6.1.10 Wastewater Treatment and Disposal
Kure Beach properly maintains a central sewer system for
wastewater treatment and disposal. All new developments are
required to connect to this system. Package sewage treatment
plants and new septic systems are not allowed. Kure Beach
supports all efforts to minimize surface and ground water
pollution from wastewater sources.
It is the policy of Kure Beach to require annexation of
adjacent areas desiring the extension of sewage treatment
capacity. The intent of this policy is to insure that the
potential for growth in or adjacent to Kure Beach does not exceed
the limiting factor of sewage treatment capacity. This is in
keeping with the Town's broader policy to insure that urban
services are adequate for all development within the Town's
jurisdiction. Implementation methods are as follows:
• The Town will review and revise all Town land use
ordinances as necessary to insure consistency with the
above policies.
• The Town has adopted appropriate zoning classifications for
annexed areas and for its extraterritorial jurisdiction in
accord with the above policies and the Land Classification
Map
and will continue to do
so as
necessary.
• The
Town will continue its
policy
of requiring annexation
as a condition of ' the extension of sewage treatment
services, and will continue to assess the impacts of all
proposed developments on its general service base.
6-12

6.1.11 Solid Waste Disposal
Kure Beach recognizes its role as the provider of solid waste
disposal services for its residents. It is the policy of Kure
' Beach to provide this service in an efficient, safe, and sanitary
manner. In order to carry out this role, adequate means of final
' disposition must always be available. Kure Beach supports the
County's incinerator and landfill project so long as adequate,
' appropriately located, landfill sites are retained, maintained,
and guaranteed.
The Town of Kure Beach will support the efforts of the County
to recycle waste materials as required by Senate Bill 111. The
Town will investigate the feasibility of establishing its own
voluntary recycling program.
6.1.12 Storm Drainage
Growth and development will not be allowed where poor
' drainage exists unless appropriate corrective improvements are to
be completed as part of the project. If residential or other low
density uses are to be developed in an area of seasonal
high-water, special requirements to insure proper drainage will
be necessary. The Town will work towards developing a master
plan for improving stormwater drainage in Kure Beach. The Town
' supports the North Carolina Stormwater Control regulations as
stated in the above policy on stormwater runoff.
6.1.13 Man -Made Hazards
Kure Beach will seek to minimize potential land use conflicts
and hazards related to development in areas adjacent to the Sunny
point Buffer Zone. Town zoning for low intensity -low density
1 6-13

development and encouraging the preservation of natural
vegetation provides a means for minimizing potential hazards from
the Buffer Zone and the CP&L power plant as well.
6.1.14 Industrial Impacts on Fragile Areas
Existing industry in fragile areas (i.e. the corrosion test
facility) does not presently have adverse impacts on the ocean
dune system. Should the situation arise where adverse impacts
would or do occur, it is the policy of the Town of Kure Beach to
seek mitigation and restoration of affected areas at the
industry's expense.
6.2 Resource Production and Management
6.2.1 Tourism - Ocean Waters and Beaches
Kure Beach's ocean waters and beaches are used for all types
of water and beach oriented recreation, including fishing for
pleasure. These resources are vital to the community's "family
vacation" oriented economy. The town of Kure Beach is canmitted
to the protection and enhancement of its waters and beaches.
6.2.2 Commercial and Recreational Fisheries
The Town of Kure Beach encourages the protection and
enhancement of North Carolina's sport and commercial fisheries
industry.
Any development or activity which will profoundly and
adversely affect coastal and estuarine waters will be
discouraged. Only those structures which are water dependent
will be allowed to be placed adjacent to coastal and estuarine
waters. In the design, construction and operation of water
6-14

Idependent structures, efforts must be made to mitigate negative
effects on water quality and fish habitat, as determined by 15A
' NCAC 7H, the Division of Environmental Management, and the
Coastal Resources Commission. The developer and/or owner will
' bear the cost of any required mitigation.
Kure Beach supports the NC Division of Marine Fisheries in
their development of regulations and policies, including those on
trawling and gill netting in ocean and estuarine waters.
6.2.3 Dredging Activities
In order to expand Kure Beach's sport and commercial
fisheries industry, Kure Beach will support private and public
projects which will positively affect those industries. Kure
. Beach supports State and Federal channel and inlet dredging and
' stabilization projects. It is recognized that in dredging and
stabilization operations, some fish habitat damage may occur.
' Only those projects which have a reasonable likelihood of
providing greater benefits than damage to fisheries industry will
' be supported. All dredging and stabilization operations must be
performed so as to minimize any unavoidable damage to fish
habitat.
6.2.4 Productivity
Kure Beach supports projects which increase productivity of
coastal and estuarine waters. Projects such as oyster reseeding
' programs and properly constructed artificial reef construction
have proved successful in the past, and therefore, will be
' supported in the future. Kure Beach supports the New Hanover
County Shellfish Action Plan.
1
6-15

6.3 Economic
Growth
and Community Development
The Town
of Kure
Beach encourages the
development of low and
medium density single
family homes
for
permanent and seasonal
residents, along with
appropriate
"low
key" accommodating
commercial services.
The Town does
not
encourage the further
development of multifamily homes, condominiums and motels outside
the appropriated zoning areas. All development must be
consistent with other relevant policies to this plan and local
land use regulations. The land use controls of Kure Beach are
and will continue to be written and enforced to insure that
proper and adequate measures
are
incorporated into
the
design,
construction and operation
of
such developments
so
that any
substantial
negative impacts
to neighboring land
uses and the
environment
are minimized.
All existing and new
development
shall be provided with necessary public services.
Uses specifically considered inconsistent with the above
policy include manufacturing or other industrial uses which would
create negative effects either on the Town's tourist -oriented
economy or Town citizens in the enjoyment of their residences.
Examples of such uses are energy facilities, landfills, and any
expansion of military installations.
6.3.1 Land Use Issues
It is the policy of the Town of Kure Beach that the Town
Planning Board
and Board
of
Commissioners develop a
schedule
by
which important
land use
and
community issues (both
present
and
future) will be addressed in a prioritized sequence over the
6-16

planning period set forth in this Land Use Plan. Any policies
developed can be incorporated into the next Land Use Plan Update.
6.3.2 Central Business District
' Kure Beach supports the continued viability of its present
central business district, particularly for those uses which
' support its general land use policy regarding tourist -oriented
businesses. The Town's policy is to encourage development and
redevelopment of these areas to meet these goals.
6.3.3 Location, Types, and Density of Development
It is the policy of the Town to allow the location type and
density of development as consistent with this Land Use Plan,
local ordinances and state and federal regulations.
Additionally, development shall be consistent with Natural
' Resource policies. The Town will consider further reducing
maximum density limits within its zoning ordinance. (Number of
units per acre or lot or size). The general location of the
types of development suggested under this policy are graphically
' displayed in the Land Classification Map.
6.3.4 Intergovernmental Cooperation
The Town of Kure Beach maintains regular lines of both formal
' and informal communication with Carolina Beach and New Hanover
' County on issues of mutual concern. Kure Beach will continue to
work together with neighboring governmental jurisdictions on
1 important issues of mutual concern. Kure Beach will comply with
State CAMA regulations.
1
6-17

6.3.5 Fort Fisher Military Base and Sunny Point Marine Ocean
Terminal Zone
In the event that Kure Beach ever has the opportunity to
utilize and or incorporate the existing land and facilities of
the federally owned Fort Fisher Military Base and/or the Sunny
Point Buffer Zone, it will be the Town' s policy to develop these
facilities so to benefit all the Town's citizens and visitors.
Uses to encourage will be: municipal facilities, community
center, municipal boat ramp for Cape Fear River access, gym,
recreational areas, jogging path, picnic areas, etc. All
development will comply with CAMA regulations where applicable.
6.3.6 Transportation
In order to adequately and safely accommodate the high
seasonal traffic volumes, which pass through the Town, Kure Beach
supports implementation of the following improvements.
• Extend Dow Road to U.S. 421 at Fort Fisher as shown in the
present Thoroughfare Plan. This item will be given highest
priority. This project will also correct the hazardous
curve at the intersection of Dow Road and K Street.
• Explore the possibility of designating Dow Road as U.S.
Highway 421 (Alternate) to Kure Beach and other points
south and current U.S. 421 as U.S. 421 (Business).
• Install sidewalks/bike path along and alternate use route
to 421 for the benefit and safety of pedestrians and
cyclists.
The
Department of Transportation
will be
contacted
for
potential participation in the
State' s
Bikeway Program.
6-18

The Town requires the connection of feeder streets to Dow
Road and U.S. 421 as a condition of development approval.
' 6.3.7 Beach Access and Recreational Facilities
All of the suitable and appropriate oceanfront rights -of -way
and properties within the Town limits have been designated and
' developed to the Town's full desired extent as public beach
access locations, providing access and parking for residents and
' visitors of Kure Beach. It is the policy of the Town to continue
to maintain and improve its existing public beach access
facilities. The Town will seek county and state funding
' assistance for public beach projects.
Kure Beach encourages the construction of individual
over -the -dune structures for access to the beach at every private
access point.
The Town of Kure Beach supports the development of parks, and
recreational facilities for the benefit of its residents and
seasonal visitors.
6.3.8 Commitment to State and Federal Programs
' Kure Beach supports those State and Federal programs and
policies affecting its jurisdiction consistent with locally
' adopted plans, policies and ordinances.
The Town supports and encourages the deposition of suitable
' dredge spoil onto nearby shorelines for beach renourishment and
erosion control. The Town fully supports the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers in their current study on renourishment in the Kure
Beach area. The Town also supports other erosion control
11
1 6-19

measures, the State Beach Access Program, highway improvement
programs, and the nearby U.S. Militaxy facilities.
6.3.9 Energy Facility Siting and Development
The Town of Kure Beach discourages offshore continental shelf
drilling for oil and gas.
Also,
the location of
shoreside OCS
facilities at Kure Beach
would
be inappropriate
and is strongly
discouraged.
6.3.10 Tourism/Type and Location of Industry
The Town of Kure Beach draws much of its livelihood from
tourism (especially summer rentals), marine recreation, and
fishing activities. The Town encourages the continuation of
these activities and the tourist industry. However, expansion of
existing public facilities which would increase "day tourism"
will be discouraged (see Section 6.3.7).
Kure Beach accepts the existence of the corrosion test
facility within its jurisdictional area. However, the Town does
not support its expansion or any new industrial development on
the island.
6.4 Storm Hazard Mitigation, Evacuation and Post Disaster
Recovery Plan
Kure
Beach's
Storm Hazard Mitigation,
Evacuation and
Post
Disaster
Recovery
plan is integral with and
incorporated in
the
New Hanover County Storm Hazard Mitigation, Evacuation and
Post -Disaster Plan.
6-20

' Very little of the land area within Kure Beach lies within
1./
the hazard areas defined in Before the Storm. These lands,
' which lie within the ocean erodible hazard area, are subject to a
number of local, state and federal standards which limit the
placement or replacement of built structures within the hazard
area.
The Town of Kure Beach encourages state and federal support
' and commitment to the maintenance, protection, and repair of US
' 421 in eventual incidences of erosion threats and storm damages,
including hurricanes and "northeasters".
' Such support and commitment is necessary to insure the safety
of lives, protect the viability of the Town, and to maintain
access to the many military, historic and recreational
facilities located south of Kure Beach on Pleasure Island.
6.4.1 Mitigation
Kure Beach's mitigation policies meet the requirements for
2./
hazard mitigation planning outlined in Before the Storm. The
' policies consist of a combination of accompanying Land Use Plan
policies and
regulations established by the Town's land
devel ognent ordinances. Specifically:
1./ Before the
Storm:
Managing Development to Reduce Hurricane
Damages.
1987.
McElyea, Brower, Godschalk, and Seymour
Center for
Urban and Regional Studies, University of North
'
Carolina at
Chapel
Hill.
2./ Before the
Storm:
Managing Development to Reduce Hurricane
Damages.
1987.
McElyea, Brower, Godschalk, and Seymour
Center for
Urban
and Regional Studies, University of North
Carolina at
Chapel
Hill.
6-21

• Lands within the hazard areas are subject to LAMA setbacks
for the Ocean Erodible AEC in combination with streetfront
setbacks building height and density restrictions imposed
by the Town's zoning ordinance.
• The Town's policies support and are consistent with State
policies and regulations for development in Areas of
Enviroranental Concern.
• All new development must conform with the provisions of the
North Carolina Building Code.
• The Town's flood plain development policies . conform with
all Federal and State requirements. New rate maps for the
Tawn are under consideration and will be adopted shortly.
• Public Acquisition of Land After A Storm. If a structure
must be relocated in order to mitigate future storm damage
because it is in a high hazard area and would again be
threatened by erosion and storm events, financial
assistance is available to property owners through the
Federal Upton -Jones Legislation enacted in 1988.
In addition, public acquisition of lands in the most
hazardous areas for beach access and other public benefits
is suggested and supported by the Division of Coastal
Management.
Kure Beach recognizes that public acquisition of land
in the most hazardous areas following a storm in some
instances may be in the best interests of the community and
the general public. Public acquisition of land in the most
hazardous areas would be linked to a determination of the
6-22

buildability of a particular lot or tract of land. This
policy on public acquisition would only be given
' consideration and exercised if State assistance for
acquisition were to be provided via access grant funds, and
technical assistance provided on the buildability
' determination. Kure Beach would support a policy for
public aquisition of land in the most hazardous areas and
' would assist in the buildability determination. However,
' this policy would not effect the Town's existing rights of
public acquisition of land under eminent domain, applicable
condemnation procedures, and other Town ordinances and
codes.
■ 6.4.2 Evacuation
' Kure Beach participates in a regional evacuation planning
process. Adequate shelter for evacuees is present on the
mainland at designated shelters.. Total evacuation to mainland
shelters is the safest procedure for Kure Beach to follow when a
significant storm is imminent.
6.4.3 Post Disaster Recovery
Kure Beach's Post Disaster Reconstruction Plan is organized
into the following sections:
• Introduction
• Organization of Local Damage Assessment Team
' • Damage Assessment Procedures and Requirements
• Organization of Recovery Operations
• Recommended Reconstruction Policies
1
6-23

The following is a summary of the Plan's most important
provisions and policies from each of these five sections:
(1) Introduction. Defines plan purpose and use; identifies
three (3) distinct reconstruction periods: Emergency,
Restoration, and Replacement/Reconstruction. Outlines sequence
of procedures to be followed to meet State and Federal Disaster
Relief regulations; (a) assess storm damage and report to County;
(b) County complies and summarizes individual community reports;
(c) State compiles County data and makes recommendation to the
Governor; (d) Governor requests Presidential declaration; (e)
Federal relief programs available.
(2) Organization
of
Local
Damage Assessment Team. Outlines
personnel available
and
sets
up means f or mayoral appointment
team.
(3) Damage Assessment Procedures and Requirements. The
purpose of this phase is to rapidly determine immediately
following a storm disaster: (a) the number of structures
damaged; (b) magnitude of damage by structure type; (c) estimated
total dollar loss; and (d) estimated total dollar loss covered by
insurance. To accomplish this, the Plan establishes four (4)
categories of damage: (1) destroyed (repairs over 80 percent of
value) ; (2) major (repairs over 30 percent of value) ; (3) minor
(repairs under 30 percent of value) ; and (4) habitable (repairs
under 15 percent of value) . A color coding system is recommended
for this phase of damage assessment. Total damage in dollars is
estimated by taking
the
County tax valuations times
a factor
to
make prices current
and
then factoring these figures
according
to
6-2 4

1
the above damage classifications. Estimated insurance coverage
is made by utilizing information as to average coverage obtained
from insurance agencies on an annual basis.
(4) Organization of Recovery Operations. The Mayor and
Board of Commissioners assume the duties of a Recovery Task
' Force. The Task Force must accomplish the following:
• Establish re-entry procedures.
• Establish overall restoration schedule.
' • Set restoration priorities.
• Determine requirements for outside assistance and request
' such assistance when beyond local capabilities.
* Keep appropriate County and State officials informed
using Situation and Damage Reports.
' • Keep the public informed.
• Assemble and maintain records of actions taken and
texpenditures and obligations incurred.
• Proclaim a local "state of emergency" if warranted.
w Commence cleanup, debris removal and utility restoration
' activities undertaken by private utility companies.
• Undertake repair and restoration of essential public
' facilities and services in accordance with priorities
developed through situation evaluations.
• Assist individual property owners in obtaining
' information on the various types of assistance that might
be available from federal and state agencies.
' (5) Recommended _ Reconstruction Policies. The policies
outlined are guidelines for the Mayor and Commissioners to
1 6-2 5

consider after a storm occurs. It is not practical to determine
at this time absolutely what specific responses are appropriate,
since the circumstances surrounding a given storm can vary
greatly. The following policy areas are discussed:
• Re-entry. Not allowed until the Mayor determines it safe
and initial damage assessment is completed. A list of
property owners will be
maintained
by the Town.
Numbered
Town license plate tags
are issued
for allowing
vehicles
evacuating to re-enter.
• Permitting. Permits to restore previously conforming
structures outside AEC's issued automatically.
Structures suffering major damage allowed to rebuild to
original state but must be in compliance with NC Building
Code, Zoning and Flood Hazard Regulations. Structures
with minor damage allowed to rebuild to original state
before the storm. Structures in AEC's allowed to rebuild
only after determination has been made as to adequacy of
existing development regulations in these special hazard
areas.
• Utility and Facility Reconstruction. Water system
components repaired or replaced must be flood -proofed or
elevated above 100-year flood levels. Procedures
established to effect emergency repairs to US 421, if
necessary.
• Temporary Development Moratorium. To be considered after
major storm damage for AEC's if existing regulations

appear inadequate to protect structures from storm
damage.
Financial reimbursement in part for relocating structures
threatened or damaged by erosion is available to property owners
through the Federal Upton -Jones Legislation enacted in 1988.
Public acquisition of oceanfront hazard area property for beach
access is often suggested and supported by the Division of
Coastal Management.
6.5 Continuing Public Participation
Kure Beach recognizes the importance and value of public
input when considering matters that will affect the Town and its
people. This includes Land Use Planning. The Kure Beach citizen
participation process is described in Section 8 of this Plan.
6.6 CAMA Policy Issues Not Relevant to Kure Beach
• ORK Areas
• Package Treatment Plants
• Development of Sound and Estuarine Islands
• Bulkhead Installation in Existing Marshes
• Productive Agricultural Lands
• Commercial Forest Lands
' • Existing and Potential Mineral Production Areas
• Peat and Phosphate Mining
• Electric Generating Plants
I
1
6-27

I
SECTION 7: LAND CLASSIFICATION
7.1 Background and Purpose
The North Carolina Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA)
Guidelines provides that each city, town and county located in
' the twenty county coastal areas develop a land classification map
classifying all of the land within its jurisdiction. The land
rclassification system provides a framework by which the Town can
identify the desired and envisioned future use of all lands
within its jurisdiction. The land classification system is
intended to be supported and complemented by zoning, subdivision
and other local methods of growth management. Although land
classification is considered a planning tool and is not in the
strict sense of the term a regulatory mechanism, the designation
of land classes reflects policy statements as to where growth and
development will occur, what types, and what densities will be
encouraged. The system also allows the conservation of natural
areas.
7.2 Kure Beach Land Classification
The land classification system set forth by the LAMA
Guidelines includes seven (7) major categories: Developed, Urban
Transition, Limited Transition, Community, Rural, Rural with
' Services, and Conservation. Five (5) land classification
designations have been found to apply to the Town of Kure Beach:
Developed - Residential, Developed - Business, Urban Transition -
Residential, Urban Transition - Business, and, Conservation. The
1
7-1

land class designations are illustrated in Map 5, the Land
Classification Map, and are discussed below.
7.2.1 Developed
The purpose of the Developed Class is to provide for
continued development and redevelopment of existing towns and
their urban environs. Areas meeting the intent of the Developed
classification are currently urban in character where minimal
undeveloped land remains and have in place, or are scheduled for
the timely provision of, the usual municipal or public services.
Services include water, sewer, recreational facilities, streets
and roads, police and fire protection.
The Developed land class areas of Kure Beach lie within the
central part of the Town, largely within its original Town
limits. The Town of Kure Beach has subdivided the Developed land
class into two subclasses, Developed - Residential and Developed
- Business, to reflect its zoning ordinance and to segregate
potentially conflicting land uses. This is in keeping with the
Town's policies on growth and development, its commitment towards
maintaining a family community atmosphere, while still providing
accommodating commercial services, motels and restaurants for
residents and tourists.
7.2.2 Urban Transition
The purpose of the Urban Transition Class is to provide for
future urban development on lands that are suitable and that will
be provided with the necessary urban services to support the
development. Areas meeting the intent of the Urban Transition
7-2

' classification are presently being developed for urban purposes
or will be developed in the next five to ten years to accommodate
anticipated population and urban growth. These areas are in, or
will be in anurban "transition" state of development going from
lower intensity to higher intensity degrees of development.
Areas classified as Urban Transition can provide land for urban
growth when lands in the Developed Class are no longer available.
Urban Transition lands must be able to support urban development
by being generally free of physical limitations and be served or
readily served by urban services. Urban services include water,
sewer, streets and roads, police and fire protection that will be
made available at the time development occurs or soon thereafter.
Urban Transition Classes in the Town of Kure Beach are to the
north and south of the Developed Class areas. These lands are
areas which have been annexed into the Town and are expected to
become Developed. As in the Developed Class described above,
Kure Beach has subdivided the Urban Transition Land Class into
residential and business subclasses.
7.2.3 Conservation
The purpose of the Conservation Class is to provide for the
effective long-term management and protection of significant,
limited, or irreplaceable natural or man-made/influenced areas.
Management is needed due to the natural, cultural, recreational,
scenic or natural productive values of both local and more than
local concern. Areas meeting the intent of this classification
include: AEC's including but not limited to public trust waters,
estuarine waters, coastal wetlands, etc., as identified in 15
1 7-3

NCAC 7H, and
discussed
in the
text of this
plan. The
Conservation
Class is
designed
to perpetuate
the natural,
productive, scenic, cultural and recreational features of the
coastal zone. As such, the Conservation Class should be applied
to areas that because of their unique, productive, limited,
cultural or natural features should be either not developed at
all (preserved), or if developed, done so in an extremely limited
and cautious fashion.
Conservation areas in Kure Beach's jurisdiction include the
ocean Erodible Area of Environmental Concern, the corrosion test
facility, the shoreline of the Cape Fear River, and all of the
Sunny
Point
Military Air Base Buffer
Zone.
The
designation
of
these
areas
as Conservation reflects
the
Town'
s policies
on
Resource Protection and Resource Production and Management
(Section 6.1). Uses permitted in the Ocean and Estuarine
Conservation areas are described in Section 6.1 under Areas of
Environmental Concern. Future uses in the Buffer Zone and other
military conservation areas limited only to recreational areas
and facilities will be encouraged.
7-4

ISECTION 8: CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
' 8.1 Citizen Participation Plan
Local governments are required by the Coastal Area Management
Act (CAMA) to employ a variety of educational efforts and
' participation techniques to assure that all segments of the
community have full opportunity to be informed and to effectively
participate in planning decision -making and the land use plan
update process. The requirement extends that for every land use
plan a formal Citizen Participation Plan be prepared and adopted
by the local government.
The Citizen Participation Plan developed for the Kure Beach
1990 Land Use Plan Update follows as Table 8.1.1. The plan is
founded upon several public meetings, informal work sessions, and
a citizen survey questionnaire. Contact and interaction between
the public, the town boards, the mayor and the primary planning
contact was maintained throughout the plan update process.
Meeting minutes are included as Appendix B of this Plan.
8.2 Citizen Survey Questionnaire
The Kure Beach Survey Questionnaire was mailed in March 1990.
A total of 862 surveys were mailed to taxpayers, including
permanent residents and non-resident property owners. Three
hundred thirty-two questionnaires were received at Town Hall for
a formidable response rate of 38.5 percent. The results of this
questionnaire as found in Appendix A were presented to the public
during a public meeting held April 10, 1990.
1 8-1

TABLE 8.1.1
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
TOWN OF KURE BEACH
1990 LAND USE PLAN UPDATE
This Citizen Participation Plan has been prepared in accor-
dance with Paragraph .0207 of 15 NCAC 7B..Guidelines for Land Use
Planning. '
Mr. William E. Burnett of the firm of Henry von Oesen and
Associates will serve as Planner in Charge, and will supervise
the project. He will be assisted by Ms. Caroline J. Bellis, also
of Henry von Oesen and Associates. Mr. Charles Allo will be the
primary contact between the Town of Kure Beach and the Planning
Consultant. The Mayor, the Town Board of Commissioners, and the
Planning Board will be also active in the plan update process,
with the Planning Board taking a prominent role.
' Included as part of this plan is a schedule of events to in-
form and receive input from the citizens as well as Town elected
officials. The schedule includes three (3) public meetings, two
informal meetings with the Boards, an informal planning workshop,
and the conduct of a Citizen Survey Questionnaire. Additional
meetings will take place between the Town and the Planning Con-
sultant, if necessary. 'Also, periodic meetings will be held be-
tween Mr. Allo, Ms. Bellis, and Mr. Burnett as the need arises.
The public will receive notice of all its opportunities for
input through'the legal advertisement of the public meetings,
newspaper and possibly other media coverage, "fliers" posted in
the Town Hall and about the town, and through the Survey Ques-
tionnaire itself.
The formal public meeting to be held at the beginning of the
plan update process will focus on the discussion of existing land
use, Town policies in the 1985 Land Use Plan, and of present
issues of concern. The importance of policy statements to the
LAMA Land Use Planning process will be emphasized. Also at this
meeting, the upcoming Citizen Survey Questionnaire will be ex-
plained. After the surveyhas been completed, a formal public
meeting will be held to discusp the results and receive further
input. Thee will also be an informal workship during the plan-
ning process to answer questions, receive comments, and discuss
land use planning issues. A formal public meeting will also be
held towards the end of the planning process. At this meeting
the draft of the completed 1990 Land Use Plan Update will be
presented to the Town and its citizens..
In addition to the above meeting, two informal meetings will
be held between the Planning Consultant, the Town Boards, and -the
Mayor. The initial meeting will be a consultation to obtain
first-hand background information about the Town and the issues
it faces regarding land use. The Citizen Participation Plan will
be adopted at -this meeting. During the second meeting, draft

1
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Table 8.1.1, Continued
Citizen Participation Plan, Continued
1990 Land Use Plan Update
Kure Beach, N. C.
Page 2
policies will be discussed along with planning progress and im-
portant findings.
All economic, social, ethnic and cultural viewpoints will be
considered as much as possible in the development of the land use
plan.
Adopted this the day of 1990
at Kure Beach, North Carolina.

1
1
1
1
1
1
A
1
1
1
1
1'
1
Table 8.1.1, Continued January 8, 1990
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
SCHEDULE OF EVENTS
KURE BEACH LAND USE PLAN
Tentative Date* Event
JANUARY .9, 1990 INFORMAL MEETING (with Mayor and
Boards): Consultation, background,
and issues. Adoption of Citizen
Participation Plan.
FEBRUARY 13, 1990 PUBLIC MEETING: Existing land use
and policies discussion, citizen
participation in plan update.
FEBRUARY 28, 1990 CITIZEN SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
MARCH 14, 1990 INFORMAL WORKSHOP discuss with in-
terested parties the land use plan-
ning process.
APRIL 10, 1990 PUBLIC MEETING: - Results of ques-
tionnaire.
APRIL 30, 1990 INFORMAL MEETING (with Mayor and`
Boards): Draft policies and plan
overview.
MAY 20, 1990 _ DRAFT POLICIES available for review
in Town Hall. -
JUNE 12, 1990 PUBLIC MEETING: Presentation of
draft final plan.
*Actual dates subject to change as needs and
circumstances dictate.

LI
8.3 Summary of Meetings
At the initial meeting with the Planning and Zoning Board on
' January 9, 1990, key topics of discussion were the Citizen
Participation Plan,
the Citizen
Survey Questionnaire, and
the
current problems and
issues facing
the Town of Kure Beach.
The
Citizen Participation Plan was approved and was subsequently
submitted to the Town Council and Mayor for final approval and
Town adoption. Discussion of format and content of the then
pending Citizen Survey Questionnaire focused on achieving direct
honest responses regarding pertinent issues. Among primary
concerns in the Town are parking, traffic, and oceanside
redevelopment.
The first formal public meeting was held in February, 1990.
The focus
of
this meeting
was
a discussion
of existing Town
policies
as
set forth in
the
1985 Land Use
Plan. Many of the
policies addressed would need update or revision due to changes
in State regulations and/or changes within the Town itself. The
Citizen Survey Questionnaire was explained to the public and
final revisions and mailing logistics were decided upon by the
Town Boards.
In March, 1990 an informal workshop .was held with the
Planning Board, Mayor, Board of Commissioners, and a
representative of the Division of Coastal Management. Existing
land use issues, information about land use planning and
processes and specific situations of concern were among the
topics discussed. At the public meeting held on April 10, 1990,
1 8-2

the results of the Citizen Survey Questionnaire (included in
Appendix A) were formally presented to the Town.
Draft text, draft policies, and draft maps were provided to
the Town during the month of May. Draft policies were discussed
by the Planning Board and Board of Commissioners. Changes and
comments on policies and text were incorporated into the draft
pl an. Draft policies were made available for public review on
May 18, 1990. A workshop on land classification was held for
Commissioners and Planning Board members on June 1, 1990.
The final public meeting, June 19, 1990, was held to present
the Town of Kure Beach with the completed draft plan for approval
and submittal to the Coastal Resources Commission.
8-3

APPENDIX A
CITIZEN SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
1
1
1
i
1
1
D

1
J
1
I
u
P
COME WHERE
TH Itt HIS SEE
P. O. Box #3 Phone [phone]
KURE BEACH, N. C. 28449
February 28, 1990
MEMBERS OF THE KURE BEACH COMMUNITY:
The Town of Kure Beach is currently involved in the prepara-
tion of its 1990 Land Use Plan Update, and has received a planning
grant from the N. C. Division of Coastal Management to assist with
the update. The Land Use Plan is very important in guiding the
growth and development a community experiences.. It is an important
policy document on local, regional, state, and federal levels. The
Land Use Plan addresses land use problems and constraints to de-
velopment, community facilities, future populations and needs, and
environmental concerns. The Plan states the Town's objectives and
policies towards land use issues, growth, development, and environ-
mental protection.
As a concerned citizen and or property owner, your opinions are
very important in establishing a plan which will accurately reflect
the direction that the community wants Kure Beach to take over the
next several years. The opinions which you offer through your re-
sponses to the attached questionnaire will be available to the public
when they have been compiled. The results of the questionnaire will
also be presented and discussed during an upcoming public meeting
scheduled for April 10, 1990 at Town Hall, during which additional
comments from the public will be encouraged. Your answers to the
questionnaire and your input toward the completed plan update will
help guide local government decisions affecting the future of Kure
Beach.
We appreciate your taking a few moments to answer the follow-
ing questions, and we thank you for participating. It is not neces-
sary to sign your name or to provide your address on your question-
naire. Please return the questionnaire to the Town Hall by close
of business Friday, March 16, 1990.
Sincerely,
Frances S. Jo es
Town Clerk

SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE FOR CITIZENS AND PROPERTY OWNERS
1990 LAND USE PLAN UPDATE
TOWN OF KURE BEACH, NORTH CAROLINA
INSTRUCTIONS: Please circle or check your answers to each of the following
questions. Some questions also ask for a written response.' There is .al so a
special section for additional comments on the last page of the questionnaire.
Thank you.
1. Which of the following best describes your relationship to the Town of
Kure Beach?
a. Permanent resident
b. Non-resident property owner/seasonal visitor
c. Owner/operator of d business in Kure Beach
d. Other (please specify)
2. What do you like most about Kure Beach? (Answer with 1 as first choice,
2 as second choice, etc.)
'i
a. Beach and Ocean
b. Investment Opportunities
c. Quiet Family Atmosphere
d. Low Taxes
e. Vacation Facilities
f. Other (Describe)
3. What do you like least about Kure Beach? (Answer with 1 as first
choice, 2 as second choice, etc.).
a. Traffic/Parking
b. Roadway s
c. Density of Development
d. Overcrowding in Season
e. Public Services
f. Distance to Major Shopping Area
g. Other (Describe)
4. What do you think are the most important problems now facing Kure Beach?
(Answer with 1 as first choice, 2 as second choice, etc.)
a. Traffic Congestion
b. Shoreline Erosion
c. Parking
d. Stormwater Runoff (Drainage)
e. Growth Management/Development
f. Environmental Protection/Water Quality
g. Other (Descri be)
1

m
5. Do you feel that growth in Kure Beach is progressing...
a. Too fast
b. Too slow
c. About right
d. Kure Beach has had enough growth
6. What types of development would you 1 i ke to see encouraged or dis-
couraged in Kure Beach?
Encouraged Discouraged
a. Permanent Residential
b. Seasonal Resi denti al
c. Single Family Residential
d. Low to Moderate Densities
e. Multi-Family/Condos/Apartments
f. Motels
g. Retail Businesses
h. Tourist Businesses
i. Parks and Natural Areas
7. In the future, do you plan to...
a. Build a house in Kure Beach
b. Start a business in Kure Beach
c. Move from Kure Beach
d. Sell my property in Kure Beach
e. None of the above
8. Kure Beach now has a 35-foot height limitation for AU buildings. Do
you feel this limitation should be...
a. Increased
b. Decreased
c. Remain the same
9. Would you like to see further growth and development of the downtown
area?
a. Yes b. No
2

Public Services
10. Are you
currently
satisfied with the following public services available
in Kure
Beach?
lu
hQ
a.
Water/Sewer System
b.
Solid Waste Collection
c.
Police Protection
d.
Enforcement of Town Laws
e.
Fire Protection
f.
h.
Rescue Squad/Emergency Medical
Government Administration
i.
Streets, Roads
J.
Parking
k.
Stormwater Drainage
If you
answered "not' to any of the above items, how• would you like to
see those services
Service
improved?
Improvement
S ,
'i
1
11. Over time, with development, and as population increases, public serv-
ices and facilities may need to be expanded or improved in Kure Beach.
How do you believe that these should be financed?
a. Individual property assessment (streets, drainage)
b. User fees - those who woul d benef it would pay
c. Taxation - all would pay through the general tax fund
d. Bond financing - money would be borrowed and paid back
12. From the following list, please select those facilities for which you
feel there is a strong enough need to justify constructing at the Town's
expense:
a. Dow Road Ext. /421 Bypass g. Picnic Facilities
b. Additional Ocean Accesses h. Community Building
c. Parking Areas i. Bike Path
d. Bath houses/Restro ons j. Tennis/Handball Courts
e. Children's Playground k. Golf Course
f. Bal1fields 1. Other
13. Please check each of the following statements about parking that you
agree with:
a. Make medians at I and E Avenues into public parking.
b. More parking is needed at public beach accessways.
c. Parking meters are needed -in the business district.
3

m
14. Who do you feel should pay for additional parking?
a. Local government
b. The users
c. Businesses (in business district)
Public Beach Access
15. Do you feel the Town of Kure Beach should encourage day visitors and
provide facilities (parking, restrocros, etc.) for them?
a. Yes b. No
16. Do you have private access to the beach?
a. Yes b. No
17. Do you feel life guard coverage at the beach is adequate?
'f
a. Yes b. No
18. Do you think public beach access in Kure Beach in adequate?
a. Yes b. No
19. Do you feel that the summer seasonal and tourist population is...
a. Too high/exceeds town capacity
b. About right
c. Low compared to other beaches
20. If the initial cost of a public restroom was $50,000 plus land cost and
the yearly upkeep cost was $10,000, would you' want the Town to construct
a public restroan downtown?
a. Yes b. No
21. If a 10-foot wide beach accessway costs $25,000 and a dune walkover ramp
costs $5,000, would you be willing for the Town to purchase more beach
accesses?
a. Yes b. No If yes, how many?
4

I
1
fl
In
closing, the
following information will be very helpful in evaluating the
results
of this
survey. Your responses will be kept confidential and will not
be
used for any
other purpose.
22.
Would you
be willing to pay an appropriate tax increase in support of
the suggestions you have made in this questionnaire for...
a.
Beach Access/Life Guards
b.
Public Parking
c.
Recreational Facilities
d.
Transportation Improvements
e.
Public Service Improvements
f.
Other
23.
Please i.ndicate your family income:
a.
Under $10,000
b.
$10,000 - $20,000
c.
$20,000 - $30,000
_ d.
$30,000 - $50,000
e.
$50,000 plus
24. What is your age group?
a. 18-35
_ b. 36-50
c. 51-65
_ d. Over 65
After completing survey questionnaire, REMOVE PAGE 7.
Fold pages 1 through 6 and staple or tape with Kure
Beach address displayed (back of page 6, pre -stamped
and self-addressed for your convenience).
Return questionnaire no later than Friday, March 16, 1990.
-5-

RESULTS OF THE CITIZEN SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
1990 KURE BEACH LAND USE PLAN UPDATE
MARCH, 1990
I QUESTION
I NO
I
I SUBJECT
I TOTAL -'
I ALL SURVEYS
I
I PERMANENT
RESIDENTIAL STATUS
I_ SEASONAL LOUSINESS
I
OWNER/OPERATOR_I
I
I
I
I
I NUMBER OF SURVEYS
1 EVALUATED
I
1 332
1 (100%)
I
1 88
1 (26%)
I I
1 228 I
1 (69%) 1
I
16 I
(5%) I
I
I 1
I
1 Relationship to the Town of
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I Kure Beach
I (96)
I M
I
I W
I I
I
I
I
I
( Permanent Resident
I
I 26
I 100
1 --- I
--- i
I
I Non -Resident Property Owner/
I 69
I ---
I 100
I
I
I Seasonal Visitor
I Owner/Operator of a Business
I
1 5
I
I ---
I I
1 --- L
I
100 i
I
I 2
I
1 What is Liked Most About
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I
I
1
I Kure Beach
I Rank
I Rank
I Rank I
I
Rank I
I
I
I
I
I Beach and Ocean
I
I 1
I
I 1
I
I 1 I
1 I
I
1 Investment Opportunities
I 4
I 4
I 4 I
4 I
i
1 Quiet Family Atmosphere
I 2
I 2
I 2 I
2 I
I
1 Low Taxes
I 3
I 3
I 5 I
3 i
1 Vacation Facilities
Other
I 5
I 6I6
I 5
1 3 1
1 61
5 I
6 _ I
I
1 3
I
I
I What is Most Disliked About
I Kure Beach
I
I Rank
I
I
I Rank
I
I I
I Rank I
I I
I
Rank I
I
I
I
I
1 Traffic and Parking
I
1 1*
I
i 1*
I I
I 2 I
i
3 I
I
I Roadways
i 4
1 5
I 5 I
1 I
1
U Density of Development
I 1*
I 1*
I 1 I
4
I
I Overcrowding in Season
I 2
I 2
1 4 1
5 I
I Public Services
I 5
I 4
1 6 I
6 I
I
I
1 Distance from Shopping Center
1 Other
I 3
1 6
1 3
1 6
1 3 I
1 7 1
2 I
7 I
*Tied for first rank.

Results of the Citizen Survey Questionnaire
1990 Kure Beach Land Use Plan Update
March, 1990
Page 2
I QUESTION
I NO
I
I SUBJECT
I TOTAL -
I ALL SURVEYS
I
I PERMANENT
I
RESIDENTIAL
SEASONAL I
STATUS
BUSINESS
OWNER/OPERATOR
I
I
I
1 4
I
1 Town's Most Important Problems
I
I
Rank
I
I Rank
I
I
Rank
I
I
1
Rank
I
{
I
I
I
I
I Traffic Congestion
I
I
4
I
I
4
I
I
5
I
4
I
I
1 Shoreline Erosion
I
1
I
1
I
1
I
1
I
1 Parking
I
6
I
6
I
6
I
3
I
I
1 Stormwater Runoff
(
5
I
5
I
4
I
6
I
I
I Growth Management/Devel oprent
1
2
I
2
I
2
I
2
I
!
1 Environmental Protection/Water
I
3
I
3
1
3
I
5
I
I
1 Quality
Other
I
1
7
I
1
7
I
1
7
(
I
7
I
I
i
1 5
I
1 Opinion of Town Growth Rate
I
I
M
t
I
M
I
I
M
I
I
M
I
I
I
I
I Too Fast
1
16
1
13
I
18
I
6
I
I
1 Too Slow
I
8
I
8
I
7
I
19
I
I
1
1 About Right
1 Town Has Had Enough Growth
(
1
45
29
I
1
52
27
I
1
43
31
I
1
56
6
{
I
1 6
I
1 Types of Development to
I Encourage/Discourage
I
I Enc.
M
Disc.
I
I Enc.
M
Disc.
1
I
Enc. Disc.
I
Enc.
M
1
Disc, I
I
1
I
I Permanent Residential
I
1 73
4
1
1 80
I
2 1
71
I
5 1
69
I
6 1
I
1 Seasonal Residential
1 46
13
1 28
22 1
54
9 1
25
19 1
t
1 Single Family
1 70
3
1 72
1 1
70
1 1
56
6 1
I
1 Low -Moderate Density
1 47
18
1 57
7 1
43
22 1
50
12 I
1
1 Multi-Family/Apartments/Condos.
1 7
72
1 3
74 1
9
73 1
9
62 i
I
1 Motels
1 11
55
1 10
41 1
10
62 1
38
25 1
{
1 Retail Businesses
1 46
21
1 36
23 1
48
21 1
62
0 1
I
I
1 Tourist Businesses
1 Parks and Natural Areas
1 38
1 72
31
4
1 32
1 60
.27 1
6 1
38
77
35 I
4 1
69
69
0 I
6 —1

M M M M M M M M = N ON won on M M = M 1
Results of the Citizen Survey Questionnaire
1990 Kure Beach Land Use Plan Update
March, 1990
Page 3
I QUESTION
I NO
I
I SUBJECT
I TOTAL -
I ALL SURVEYS
I
I
PERMANENT
I
RESIDENTIAL
SEASONAL i BUSINESS
STATUS
OWNER/OPERATOR
I
I
I 7
1
I Future Plans in Kure Beach
I
I M
I
I
M
I
1
M
I
I
M
I
I
I
I Build a House
1 14
1
15
1
12
I
21
I
I
1 Start a Business
I 4
I
5
I
3
I
12
I
I
1 Move From Kure Beach
I 4
I
6
I
3
I
0
I
I
1 Sell Their Property
I 10
I
6
1
11
I
19
I
I
I None of the Above
1 65
1
68
1
65
1
44
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 8
I
1 Opinion on 35-Foot Building
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I Height Limit: It Should
I M
I
M
I
M
I
M
I
I
I Be Increased
I 4
I
6
{
3
I
13
I
I
{
1 Be Decreased
1 Remain the Same
1 15
1 74
1
1
14
78
I
1
16
72
I
I
6
69
I
I
I
1 9
I
1 Would Like Further Downtown
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
{
I Growth and Development?
I M
I
M
I
M
I
I
I Yes
1 No
I 54
1 39
I
1
49
45
I
1
55
38
I
1
69
19
I
_I
i
I 10
I
I Public Services Satisfaction
I
I M
I
(%) I
I
1
M
I
M I
M
I
M I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Water/Sewer System
1 77
13 1
69
19 1
80
9 1
69
19 I
I
1 Solid Waste Collection
1 83
6 1
82
7 1
83
6 1
81
6 I
I
1 Police Protection
1 84
6 1
84
11 1
.84
4 1
81
12 I
I
1 Town Law Enforcement
1 73
19 1
70
17 1
76
6 1
50
31 1
1
1 Fire Protection
1 79
4 1
84
7 1
79
2 1
75
19 1
I
1 Rescue/Emergency Squad
1 74
5 1
82
6 1
72
4 1
63
19 I
I
1 Government Administration
1 67
15 1
67
18 1
68
13 1
56
31 I
i
I Streets/Roads
1 66
20 1
67
23 1
67
18 1
31
50 I
I
I
I Parking
1 Stormwater Drainage
1 58
1 58
25 1
19 1
55
58
33 1
17 1
60
58
21 1
19 1
38
56
44 I
31 1

Results of the Citizen Survey Questionnaire
1990 Kure Beach Land Use Plan Update
March, 1990
Page 4
I QUESTION
{ NO
I
I SUBJECT
I TOTAL -.
1 ALL SURVEYS
1
I PERMANENT
RESIDENTIAL STATUS
I SEASONAL I BUSINESS
I
OWNERLOPERATOR_I
I
I 11
I
I Financing Public Facilities
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I
I
I Choice
i (%)
I (%)
I (%) I
I
(%) I
I
I
I
I
I Individual Assessment
I
I 7
I
1 3
1
1 7 I
12 I
I
1 User Fees
I 61
1 75
I 57 I
50 I
I
I
1 Taxation
1 Bond Financing
I 15
29
1 11
I 17
I 15 I
1 33 1
31 I
31 I
I
1 12
I
I
1 Facilities Needed Justifying
I Town Expense
1
I (%)
I
I
I (%)
I
I I
I (%) I
I I
I
(%) I
I
I
I
I
I Dow Road Extension/421 Bypass
I
I 27
I
I 27
I I
{ 26 I
I
31 I
I
1 Additional Ocean Access
I 16
I 15
I 17 I
12 I
I
I Parking Areas
1 25
1 25
1 24 I
44 i
Bathhouse/Restrocros
I 22
I 22
1 21 I
38 I
I
1 Children's Playground
I 27
I 29
I 25 I
38 I
I
1 Ballfields
I 14
1 20
I 10 I
5 I
1
1 Picnic Facilities
I 23
1 16
1 25 I
44 I
I
1 Community Building
1 12
1 16
1 10 1
19 I
I
1 Bike Path
1 30
1 31
I 31 I
19 I
I
1 Tennis/Handball Courts
I 15
I 15
I 15 (
25 I
I
{
1 Golf Course
1 Other
1 18
I 5
1 10
1 10
1 20 1
1 2 1
12 I
6 I
1 13
1 Agree with the Following Parking
I
I
I
I
1 I
I I
I
I
I
I statements:
I
i
I
I
I Make I, E Sreet Medians Public
I
1 34
I
I 36
I I
1 33 I
31 I
1 Parking
I
I
I I
I
I
I Need More Parking at Beach
I
I
I I
I
i
{
I Accesses
1 Need Parking Meters Downtown
I 33
1 17
1 33
1 22
I 33 I
1 15 I
31 I
12 i

ew m m m m
Results of the Citizen Survey Questionnaire
1990 Kure Beach Land Use Plan Update
March, 1990
Page 5
I QUESTION
I NO
I
I SUBJECT
I TOTAL —
I ALL SURVEYS
I
I
PERMANENT
I
RESIDENTIAL
SEASONAL I
STATUS
BUSINESS
OWNER/OPERATOR
I
I
I
1 14
I
1 Who Should Pay for Additional
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Parking_
1 (%)
I
(%)
I
(%)
I
(%)
I
I
I Local Government
I 19
I
20
1
19
I
19
I
I
1 Users
1 46
1
53
1
44
I
38
I
I
I Businesses
1 27
1
28
1
27
1
12
I
1 15
I Kure Beach Should Encourage and
I
1 (%)
I
(%) I
(%)
I
(%) I
(%)
(%) I
(%)
I
I
Provide for Day Visitors
I
1
1 Yp2
I
1 27
No I
I
60 1
Y-e-a
25
hg_ I
I
69 1
.Y2
27
No I
1
56 1
Y
19
1�
I
69 I
I
1 16
I
1 Have Private Access to Ocean
I
I (%)
I
W I
(%)
I
(%) I
(%)
I
I
I
I
I Y
I
1 39
I`!SL I
i
50 1
Yes
28
I
67 1
43
I
39 1
38
I
50 1
I
1 17
I
1 Is Lifeguard Coverage Adequate?
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I Yes
1 No
I
I 60
1 23
I
I
1
73
22
1
1
55
22
1
1
75
25
I
I
I
1 18
I
1 Is Beach Access Adequate?
I
I (%)
I
(%) I
(%)
I
(%) I
(%)
I
(%) I
(%)
I
(%) I
I
i
I
I
1 70
I
15 1
.Y&5
78
llD- I
16 1
lu
66
hQ- 1
15 1
122
75
1� i
I
12 I
I
1 19
I
1 Feel The Town Summer Population
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 is....
I (%)
I
I
I
I
I Too High
I
I 11
I
1
15
I
I
4
I
1
12
I
I
1 About Right
1 Low Compared to Other Beaches
1 52
1 16
1
1
61
15
1
1
49
18
1-
1
38
38
I
I

Results of the Citizen Survey Questionnaire
1990 Kure Beach Land Use Plan Update
March, 1990
Page 6
I QUESTION
NO,
I
I SUBJECT
I TOTAL -
I ALL SURVEYS
I
I
PERMANENT
I
RESIDENTIAL
SEASONAL I BUSINESS
STATUS
OWNER/OPERATOR
I
I
20
I
1 fDx Town Construction of Public
I
I (%)
I
(%) I
(%)
I
M I
(%)
I
(%) (
(%)
I
t%) I
I
1 Restroom Downtown
I Y9m
1 18
EQ— I
65 1
Y S
19
SD— I
76 1
MIS
17
EQ— I
60 1
Ysm
25
EQ— I
I
63 I
I
I
I
1 21
I
1 fDr Town Aquisition of More
I
I (%)
I
(%) I
(%)
I
t%) I
I
I
I .
I
I
I Beach Accessways
1
I
I Y9;i
I
I 15
N9. 1
I
67 1
121
15
N.L I
I
78 1
_ lea
15
No— I
I
62 1
MIS
19
tISL I
I
69 I
I
1 22
I
1 Would Support Tax Increase For—
I
I (%)
I
I
(%)
I
I
(%)
I
I
(%)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Beach Access/Lifeguard
I
I 18
I
I
18
I
1
18
I
I
19
I
I
1 Public Parking
I 11
1
10
1
10
I
19
I
I
1 Recreational Facilities
1 26
1
27
1
23
I
50
I
I
I Transportation Improvements
I 11
1
10
1
24
I
12
I
I
I
1 Public Service Improvements
1 Other
I 18
1 8
1
1
17
3
1
1
18
9
I
1
44
6
I
I
1
I 23
I Family Income
I (%)
I
(%)
I
(%)
I
(%)
I
I I
f
I Less Than $10#000
1
I 2
I
I
7
I
I
1
I
I
0
I
I
I
1 $10,000 - $20s000
I 11
I
22
I
7
I
6
I
I
I $20,000 - $30,000
I 14
I
18
I
11
I
31
I
i
1
1 $30,000 - MOM
More Than $50,000
1 25
1 37
I
1
31
10
I
1
21
47
I
I
6
50 _
I
1
■. m m m m m m m r r m m mom r WWWM

Results of the Citizen Survey Questionnaire
1990 Kure Beach Land Use Plan Update
March, 1990
Page 7
I QUESTION I I TOTAL -
I
RESIDENTIAL STATUS
I
I NO 1 SUBJECT I ALL SURVEYS
I PERMANENT
I SEASONAL I BUSINESS
OWNER/OPERATOR--1
I 1 f
1 24 1 Age Group
1
I
I I
I I
I
I
I I I
I 1 18 - 35 1 3
1 5
1 2 1
6 1
1 1 36 - 50 1 34
1 22
1 30 1
50 I
I 1 51 - 65 1 37
1 32
1 39 1
44 I
Response To Questionnaire:
862 surveys were mailed out.
332 were returned and evaluated for a response rate of 38.5 percent.

RESULTS OF THE
CITIZEN SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
1990 KURE BEACH LAND USE PLAN UPDATE
A. Multiple Choice Questions
1. Eight hundred and sixty-two (862) surveys were mailed
out to Town water/sewer customers and taxpayers in late
February. Three hundred thirty-two (332.), or 38%, were
returned.
Of those who responded, 69% were seasonal residents and
non-resident property owners, 26% were permanent resi-
dents, and 5% own or operate a Kure Beach business.
2.
People listed the Beach and Ocean and the Quiet Family
Atmosphere as the top things they liked most about Kure
Beach. Third, fourth and fifth were Low Taxes, Invest-
ment Opportunities, and Vacation Facilities.
3.
Traffic, Parking, and Density of Development were
listed as top things most disliked about the Town by
the permanent and seasonal residents. Most disliked by
the business community are the roadways and distance to
major shopping areas.
4.
Beach Erosion predominantly was redominantl considered the most im-
portant problem facing the Town of Kure Beach, followed
by Growth Management and Development. Environmental
Protection and Water Quality were listed third, and
Traffic Congestion fourth. Stormwater Runoff and Park-
ing were ranked as fifth and sixth.
5.
In general, the Kure Beach community indicated that the
Town was growing at a rate "about right" (45%). Many
people, twenty-nine (29%) percent of the residential
community, felt that the Town had had enough growth.
6.
Types of development which respondents strongly indi-
cated should be encouraged by the Town include: Single
family permanent and seasonal residential at low to
moderate densities, retail and tourist businesses, and
-natural areas.
parks
Types of development to discourage included: Multi-
family developments, condos, and motels.
7.
Regarding future plans in Kure Beach, 14% of all
respondents (and 21% of the business persons) said they
plan to build a house in Kure Beach. Four (0) percent
(and 12% of the business persons) plan to start a busi-
ness, 4% plan to move from Kure Beach, and 10% plan to
sell their
property.
1

.. r"
8. Seventy-four (74%) percent of the respondents to the
;- questionnaire felt that the 35-foot Building Height
Limitation should remain the same. Fifteen (15%) per-
cent felt it should be decreased, and only 4% felt it
should be increased.
9. Further growth and development in the downtown area
were favored by only half of the respondents (54%) and
not desired by the lesser 38%.
10. The Kure Beach community is generally satisfied with
the following public services: Water/Sewer, Solid
Waste Collection, Police Protection, Enforcement of
Town Laws, and Fire Protection -Rescue Services. t
Some dissatisfaction was indicated with the government
administration, streets and roads, parking, stormwater
drainage, and - on behalf of the permanent residents
and the business community - with the water/sewer sys-
tem.
11. To finance public facilities improvements, User Fees
were preferred by most at 57%, followed by Bond Financ-
ing at 29%.
12. Fewer than 30% of the respondents indicated the need
for certain Town facilities that would justify Town ex-
pense. Those supported by 25% to 30% of the community
included the Dow Road Extension/#421 Bypass, Parking
Areas, Children's Playground, and Bike Path.
13. On Parking, only about a third of the respondents to
the questionnaire agreed that the I and E Street
medians should be made into public parking, or that
more public parking was needed at beach accessways.
Only 17% agreed that parking meters were needed
downtown.
14. Almost half (46%) of the respondents indicated they
thought the users should pay for additional parking
areas in Kure Beach. Twenty-seven (27%) felt that
these costs should be shared by the businesses (if near
downtown), and 19% by the local government.
15. The Kure Beach community in general (Z60%) does not
feel that the Town should encourage and provide
facilities for day visitors.
a
16. More people do not have private beach accesses in Kure
Beach than do (50% versus 39% overall). The seasonal
residents were more likely to have private access than
the permanent residents or businesses (43%).
2

1 17. The majority of the respondents indicated they felt
Lifeguard Coverage was adequate (60%). Only 23% felt
it was not.
18.
The majority, 70%, also felt that Public Beach Access
in the Town was adequate. Only 15% said it was not.
19.
On average (52%), people indicated that they felt the
Town's Summer Population was about right. Eighteen
(18%) percent thought it was low compared to other
'
beaches, but 11% felt it was too high.
20.
Town construction of a Public Restroom was generally
opposed(65%), and was supported by less than 20% (18%)
of the respondents.
21.
Town acquisition of additional public beach accessways
was also opposed (by 67%), and supported by only 15% of
the community.
22.
Few respondents indicated they would support an ap-
propriate tax increase for suggested Town facility im-
provements. Those who did indicated they would support
the increase for Recreational Facilities (26% overall),
Beach Access Improvements/Life Guards (18%), and Public
Services (18%) .
23.
Family income in the Kure Beach community ranges from
less.than $10,000/year to over $50,000/year.
24.
The majority of the respondents were between the ages
of 36 and 50 (71% of the total). Twenty-three (23%)
percent of the total and 30% of the permanent residents
replied that they were over 65 (retired).
' B. Summary of "Other" Statements and Additional Comments
2. "Other" Most Liked
Fishing
The (friendly) people
Fort Fisher/Historical area
"Hideaway"
3. "Other" Most Disliked
Unkempt lots
Dogs on beach
No cable TV
City officials
Too many motels/tall buildings
Need recreation facilities (golf, tennis, etc.)
No beach erosion control program
3

4. "Other" Important Problems
t
Need to clean and beautify town
Update water/sewer system
High taxes
10. Improvements to Public Services
Water/Sewer: Water too hard - has odor - please soften
- too expensive - don't charge year-round for seasonal
Solid Waste Collection: Collection more often - need
recycling program
Police Protection: Too many speeding tickets - speed
traps preying on tourists is bad for town image - need
quality officers
Enforcement of Town Laws: Leash law - keep dogs off
beach - equal building inspection
Fire Protection: Need to update equipment and increase
rating
Rescue Squad: Need full-time in town
Government Administration: Cooperation, management and
professional attitude needed - more citizen input -
consider residents and keep informed
Streets and Roads: Curb and gutter - repave
Parking: Need more downtown - need more at accessways
Stormwater Drainage: Curb and gutter - prevent ponding
12. "Other" Needed Public Facilities
Shuffleboard
Handicapped beach access
Beach restoration
Sidewalks on #421
21. Number of Additional Beach Access to Acquire
2 - 4 - as needed
24. "Other`Items to Support_.Tax Increase for
Beach erosion control/beach nourishment
Children's playground
Town beautification/landscaping
#421 and Dow Road sidewalks
4

Additional Comments:
t"
Cut bushes at blind spots on roads (especially at I and 3rd
Streets)
Parking at I and E Street medians would increase noise and
litter
Shuttlebus to Fort Fisher from Carolina Beach would ease
traffic
Utilize senior citizen resources and services to improve
beach accessways and other facility improvements
Want home mail delivery
Town is a speed trap - this will hurt tourism
Don't encourage day visitors
No more taxes
Address the concerns of the residents
Keep town as it is
Encourage nice restaurants and shops
Need to provide bathhouse so private facilities not abused
p
I
i
t
5

APPENDIX B
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MINUTES OF MEETINGS ON LAND USE PLANNING
�j
IJ

In
4 C•I C. ^.j c i

1
THE ISLAND GAZETTE
Wednesday, February 7, 1990
PUBLIC NOTICE
The Kure Beach Planning & Zoning Commission will hold a ]ub
meeting Tuesday. February 13. 1990 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council
at Town Hall to discuss existing Land Use Policies and citizen s
questionnaires. which will be distributed to solicit public input o
use issues that concern the Town.
Responses to the questionnaires and comments received ameeting will be used in the preparation of the 1990 Kure Beach
Use Plan Update.
Bob Bennett, Chairman
Kure Beach Planning & Zoning
W7190

Ll
I
i'��.r��.��, •-fC/ ��•yG- i L-4-r�-�f � � c� . • G•D7•rt���Y4�2,�G�r�.
uy-•
�YL y�..�_{ v 2-h•itGL� f /LGc'C�' J G{ l,l`�—�
Qt I:/iri-7+•/j, tili�'�-J r'��lL.-�1•�rr 'tract!(
_ `• . �i..�i !! a �/A �
\.�.�"�,'i �.�G'Y�E•G+� — 7�'fA_sz.^'! f. !/ it r4 �i��'�' E L� /.1its- .�.. lip. ,
�. �. {c�(.fiiyritt'�.C—.. i�•i/rW .%=�rt�♦ �s�. ✓ S-�,Cr.• r. �%t.;-s> ��lt.Y.1 - -
C-4k.., Ct.0 4'r �C G .0.,:.� •�.•. �f`if �•
(i�!'�.` J.3.�t.+�- L� , r .�t.F�^� ,/�. �C'; . i%�-•G•-C t e . i �5C!' � L.a� 6�.L Ci - _
_._.. �t�-<�^�..�..1��c�oc� �'?����f,�� : �c-•A✓ .� r � Div �L<� _
er• C ez. (� i i r / •/! C: /'j �i.-G'i"G- . •^ .
`' t O�oL J�t•</t-C� � ��!.1�4�-tt-�- .Q�Ga.-c.��� ��:.c ,. �,1 • . f' v
r r• � ' �.. � � LG �•C�-� � t-i.�ta � [.C.-[.� a.. � .. i • . L /fir /Jr1t�',+t : al't'.l--
�.-� .,v�,cr-•-a--•� r.,,�.att•c.•.� a....� sec-o�•�c.�f' 1-�-r ��: �•�ac�
_-etc R ;i ss�.• Gir�I� ,.I'Lac�'w'wc-'�I -'a 'f�i /its �-�..r
1 i

I
1
I
I
THE ISLAND GAZETTE
Wednesday, March 7, 1990
PIMLIC NOTICE
The Kure Beach Land Use Plan Update will be discussed at the regular
monthly meetings of the Kure Beach Planning and Zoning Commission,
the second Tuesday of each month - March 13, April 10 and May 8 at
7:30 p.m. at the Kure Beach Town Hall/Council Room.
Comments relative to the. development of the Land Use Plan Update
will be received at this time.
Interested persons are urged to attend.
Bob Bennett, Chairman
Planning & Zoning Commission
3nno
11

-4
= m w = = m m m m = = = m = = = w = =

rr �r r r r� rr rr rr �r r� �r �r ■r it
r = w = =

l
F
1
1
1
11
THE ISLAND GAZETTE
Wednesday, June 13, 1990
PUBLIC NOTICE
The Kure Beach Town Council will hold a public hearing at the Kure
Beach Town Hall Council Room, June 19, 1990 at 7:00 pm, to receive
public comment on the draft Land Use Plan update.
All interested citizens are urged to attend.
Frances S. Jones
Town Clerk
16/13/90

M r = = = = = = = = = r = = M
r = M
2C Wilmington Moming Star / Thursday, June 21,' 1990
• Inure PB.,eacn,­., eis ust�� about , t.
B Mark Schauer..
y
The questionnaire asked 24 ques-
tions, including what people liked
Staff writer
most and least about Kure Beach,
KURE BEACH - Most year- `
what were the biggest problems fac-
round and summer residents of
ing the town and under what cir-;
Kure Beach say they are satisfied
cumstances .they would support a .
with the pace of development in the
'tax increase.
town, but day visitors should not be
Those who responded said they
encouraged, according to the results
liked the .beach, the ocean and the.
of a survey by an engineering firm. '
town's "quiet, family atmosphere".'
.
The survey, which was distribut.
the most. They disliked traffic,
ed by mail in March, paints a rough
parking and the density of develop-
portrait of how residents and busi- '
ment.' r
ness owners view the town and its
The most important problem fac- ,
future growth.
ing the town is beach erosion, fol.
` But because the' respondents
lowed -'by the management of .
were not randomly selected and
growth and development and envi-
only about one-third of the 862 peo-
ronmental protection, according to •
ple who received the questionnaire
the survey." ' :; , - -
returned it, the results are not a
-The survey showed weals support
scientifically accurate reflection of
for increased taxes to ay for beach .
Kure Beach opinion.
access, lifeguards,. public parking,
recreational facilities, transporta-
tion improvements or public service
improvements. Adding recreational
facilities received the most support:
' 26 percent said they would be will-
ing to pay higher taxes to get them.
The vast majority of those who
answered the survey, between 60
and 70 percent, said the town had
adequate beach. access , and life-, i
guard 'coverage. They also over-
whelming opposed building another;'
public restroom downtown, with 65
percent saying no.
But a majorit , 54 percent, said
they would like further downtown
growth and development!' Thirty-
nine percent answered no. to that f
question.
Kure Beach has an estimated
summer population of 9,000, and 52
percent of the respondents said that
was "about right." Eleven percent
said it was "too high," and 18 per
cent said it was "low compared , to;
other beaches.", x...; ., ; ; .I.
Fourty-five percent of the respon
dents said the town's growth rate,
has been `Just right," 29 percent:
said -the "town has had enough:
growth" and 16 percent said it has'
been "too fast." Only eight percent
..said it has been "'too slow " c i ' ",
Asked if the town should. encour
age or provide facilities for day visi
tors, 60 percent said no, and 27 per
cent said yea. •- +v
The . survey was conducted by:
Henry von Oesen and Associates, a;
Wilmington engineering and plan
ning firm, to help the town draft an,
update :of Kure Beach's land use:
elan.

APPENDIX C
SENATE BILL 111 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
1
11
I
1

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
SENATE BILL 111
IMPLE`4ENTATION SCHEDULE
KEY DATES LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
Jan. 1, 1990
March 1, 1990
May 15, 1990
July 1, 1990
Aug. 1, 1990
Oct. 1, 1990
r Jan. 1, 1991
July 1, 1991
Oct. 1, 1991
Jan. 1, 1992
March 1, 1992
Jan. 1, 1993
Counties must designate at least
one site for scrap tire disposal.
Counties receive first quarterly
payment of tire tax.
First Annual report on local .
solid waste management program
and recycling activities must be
submitted to DHR.
Waste oil must be banned from
landfills:
Local governments which operate
SWM facilities must publish
cost analysis.
No lead —acid batteries in
landfills .
No "white goods" in landfills.
Local governments must initiate
"economically feasible"
recycling programs.
All solid waste must be weighed
before disposal.
Local governments submit biennial
solid waste plans.
No yard waste in landfils — may
be placed in monofills.
PRIVATE AND CORPORATE SECTOR
Tire retailers begin collecting
1% tax on tires.
Tire haulers must prepare
documents on source of scrap tires
No beverage containers with
detachable rings may be sold.
"Nuisance" scrap tire dumps
must be closed.
Medical waste generators must
comply with DHR rules.
All plastic bags must be
recyclable.
Retailers must accept old lead —
acid batteries as trade—ins.
Certain types of plastic
containers must be labeled
as type of plastic used in
manufacture.
CFC packaging banned.
Polystyrene packaging must be
recyclable.
Waste oil haulers must be
certified.

Chapter 784 - Senate Bil1*111
"An Act to Improve the Management of Solid Waste"
Implementation Timetable
' 1989 1 October
* Act becomes effective.
' 1990 1 January
* Sale of beverage containers which are opened with a detachable
metal ring or tab banned.
* The Commission shall adopt rules to carry out provisions of scrap
tire disposal program.
* Scrap tire disposal fee of 1% levied on new tire sales.
' 1 March
* Rule making initiated and at least one public hearing held on
methods to be used in determining the cost of solid waste
management.
' x All scrap tires must be disposed of in accordance with N.C. Scrap
Tire Disposal Act.
1 April
* Rulemaking initiated to prescribe allowable users and application
rates for composting.
' 1 Mav
* The Secretary of Administratin-ah�l1.�,Ar �t,�,inc3�Per� am .
recommendations regarding the use of paper and paper products to
' the Governor,. Environmental Review Commission, and the General.
Assembly.
' 1 Jul_v
* It shall be unlawful to dispose of scrap tires unless disposed of
at a permitted scrap tire collection, disposal, or processing
facility.
* Scrap tire collection sites must be permitted and 90-day notice
given to remove or process tires from nuisance sites.-
1 August
* The Commission shall adopt rules to regulate medical waste.
' 1 October
Each local government shall annually submit a report to the
Department describing its solid waste management program and
recycling activities.
' * Landfilling of used oil is banned.
11

1991 1 January
* Plastic shopping bags banned unless certified that 25% of such
bags are being recycled.
* No lead -acid batteries shall be disposed of in landfills or
waste -to -energy facilities.
* No white goods shall be landfilled.
* The Department shall initiate rule making to develop a grants
program for local governments to encourage the collection, reuse,
' and proper disposal of used oil.
* The Department shall assist the Department of Public Instruction
and UNC in developing and distributing guidelines for waste
' reduction and recyclables collection in the State system of
education.
' 1 March
* The Department shall develop a comprehensive solid waste
management plan and annually prepare a report on status of solid
waste management in the State.
' * The Department of Economic and Community Development shall issue
a report assessing recycling industries and markets and types of
material for composting.
' * The Department shall prepare an analysis of solid waste
generation and disposal in the State for a 20-year period
beginning on -this date.
1 Ju1v
* Each.;',�signated local government shall initiate a recyclable.
materials recycling program designed to meet the state's 25%
recycling goal including separation of a majority of the
marketable materials.
* Construction and demolition debris must be segregated and
disposed in separate locations at a solid waste disposal
facility.
* Each operator of a solid waste management facility owned or
r operated on behalf of a county or municipality shall weigh all
solid waste when received.
* Plastic containers distributed, sold, or offered for sale must
have a molded label indicating the type of resin used in its
manufacture.
1 October
* Local governments shall develop a system using State guidelines
to inform their solid waste service recipients of their share of
the full cost for solid waste management. (Rule making schedule
may extend this deadline.)
* Products packaged in a container or packing material manufactured
with fully halogenated chlorofluorocarbons (CrC's) are banned
from sale or distribution.
* Polystyrene foam food packaging products are banned from sale or
distribution unless recyclable.

1992 1 January
* The Department shall develop a permitting system for used oil
facilities.
* Duties of State agencies involved in solid waste management are
defined.
' * Anyone transporting over 500 gallons of used oil in any week must
be certified or employed by a certified transporter.
1 April
* Compost standards shall be adopted.
1993 1 January
' * At least 25% of total waste stream is to be recycled. (State
goal.)
* Plastic shopping bags are banned unless certified that 25% of
' such bags are being recycled.
* No yard trash shall be disposed of in landfills, except in
landfills classified for such use.
' 1 October
* Polystyrene foam food packaging products are banned from sale or
distribution unless 25% of such products are being recycled.
' 1996 1 January
* Operators of solid waste management facilities shall have
completed a certification training -course approved by the
' Department.
I
1

��
II
s�
�I
,l
' y

THE PREPARATION OF THIS MAP WAS FINANCED IN PART THROUGH A GRANT
PROVIDED BY THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM THROUGH
FUNDS PROVIDED BY THE COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1972, AS AMENDED,
•°>§- WHICH IS ADMINISTERED BY THE OFFICE OF OCEAN- AND COASTAL RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT, N,O.A,A
}
.t
........
.s
�
•,
x ,•
Y
,
ZA
•.�' ' ;s»
..
�i
F+
VER
CAPE FEAR 9�
EBB F OOD 0'A
. %+
02
</
z
s
Ito lwm wool
Now
naaa.uaaa.aauaaaaauasuaau.uasaauaauuuaaauu...uu.....auuaaaaauu....uu
A TL AN 77 C OCEAN
D
u..aaaau....
RO AD
DOWN
A
4
BON'1TA
qmw& rg'a 11111
LEGEND:
RESIDENTIAL
1
SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED
MOBILE HOME
DUPLEX / TRIPLEX
•_•_•_•_•_ MULTI -FAMILY
COMMERCIAL MOTEL
COMMERCIAL
TRANSPORTATION 81 UTILITIES
INDUSTRIAL 81 RELATED.
PUBLIC & INSTITUTIONAL
PARKS 81 OPEN $PACE -
C I VACANT f
=
SYMBOL DATE DESCRIPT, UN Bw
REVISIONS
1990 L AND USE PLAN UPDATE
K URE BEACH, NC -
EXISTING LAND USE
HENRY VON OESEN & ASSOCIATEd
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & PLANNERS
805 NORTH THIRD STREET
WILMINGTON NORTH CAROL INA 28401
919-763-0141
DES FILE No 3606
DRWN
MAP #
CHK SHEET
' 0.0
1" = 300'
DATE OF
I
LEGEND:
RESIDENTIAL
1
SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED
MOBILE HOME
DUPLEX / TRIPLEX
•_•_•_•_•_ MULTI -FAMILY
COMMERCIAL MOTEL
COMMERCIAL
TRANSPORTATION 81 UTILITIES
INDUSTRIAL 81 RELATED.
PUBLIC & INSTITUTIONAL
PARKS 81 OPEN $PACE -
C I VACANT f
=
SYMBOL DATE DESCRIPT, UN Bw
REVISIONS
1990 L AND USE PLAN UPDATE
K URE BEACH, NC -
EXISTING LAND USE
HENRY VON OESEN & ASSOCIATEd
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & PLANNERS
805 NORTH THIRD STREET
WILMINGTON NORTH CAROL INA 28401
919-763-0141
DES FILE No 3606
DRWN
MAP #
CHK SHEET
' 0.0
1" = 300'
DATE OF
I

THE PREPARATION OF THIS MAP WAS FINANCED IN PART THROUGH A GRANT
PROVIDED BY THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM THROUGH
FUNDS PROVIDED BY THE COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1972, AS AMENDED,
WHICH IS ADMINISTERED BY THE OFFICE OF OCEAN AND COASTAL RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT, N,O,A,A,
ATL AN rJ C OCEAN
CAPE FEAR RIVER
Eg8 FLOOD
RO pD
DO*
0
LEGEND:
RESIDENTIAL
RA-1
RA-2
RA-3
RA-4
RA-1A
RA-2A
RA--3A
RA-2T
RB-1
A
COMMERCIAL
a-i
e-z
B-3
."
SVM9V� ;,4'F _rf S" R P' ti r
REVISIONS
1990 LAND USE PLAN UPDATE
KURE BEACH, NC
ZONING MAP
HENRY VON OESEN & ASSOCIATES
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & PLANNERS
805 NORTH THIRD STREET
WILMINGTON NORTH CAROLINA 28401
919-763-0141
DES FI, E 3606
No
DRWN
MAP # �:HK SHEET
a c A
I = 300
DATE OF Q
s

i
i i
I
I
THE PREPARATIOI
PROVIDED BY THE NORTI
FUNDS PROVIDED BY THI
WHICH IS ADMINISTE
MANAGEMENT, NiO.A.,A.
I.
.:�.1"`,ram?i._. 4
A TL AN T! C OCEAN
{
e-
SYMBOL DATE DESCRIPTION BY .
REVISIONS
1%0 LAND USE PLAN UPDATE
KURE BEACH, N.C.
�z
COMMUNITY FACILITIES MAP
HENRY VON OESEN & ASSOCIATE .
CONSULTING ENGINEERS 3 PLANNERS'
805 NORTH THIRD 4TREET
WILMINGTON NORTH CAROLINA 28401
919-763-0141
DES FILE fix. a
No 3606 {
DRWN
MAP #�'
CHK SHEET
O.C.
" = 300',
DATE OR. Z �1

THE PREPARATION OF THIS MAP WAS FINANCED IN PART THROUGH A GRANT
PROVIDED BY THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM THROUGH
FUNDS PROVIDED BY THE COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1972, AS AMENDED,
_ WE
Ml
t.
.M
w
ATLANT/C OCEAN
DER WAUTY CLASS A71ON-SB
I
j
a
FLOOD PLAIN ('A' ZONES)
FLOOD HAZARD AREA (11V" ZONES)
AND OCEAN,,EROD I BLE AEC
ESTUARINE SHORELINE AEC
HISTORIC / ARCHITECTURAL SITE
31NH__� ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE
c
1�
#'r
'
Yf,
F.•'
e ! t{
Y.
6
r;
i
:Z
�F
y
{
1 ,
M
t.
�.7
�r
• q.
9�4 A
e* t
M r�Y
rat
4�
J �ti
SiMBOI CATf DF S:: F'PT'JN
REVISIONS
i
1990 LAND USE PLAN V TI, I ,
K URE BE ACfi4�.
FLOOD HAZARDa FRAGILE .A
HENRY VON OESEN � i, AS2W
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & PLANNER! �' `.
805 NORTH THIRD STREET
WILMINGTON NORTH CAROLINA
919-763-0141
DES PILE +,>;
No
DRWN
MAP #
CHK:
DATE
rs

rc S.
j,
af mow. rn
ne
x ..
% J^
THE PREPARATION OF THIS MAP WAS FINANCED IN PART THROUGH A GRANS'
PROVIDED BY THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM THROUGN
FUNDS PROVIDED BY THE COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1972, AS AMENDED.
�1}
�w
4
WHICH IS ADMINISTERED BY THE OFFICE OF OCEAN AND COASTAL RESOURCE
'
MANAGEhENT, N.O,A.A,
s
c
_
}
' 1
9 ;:,., p T•^'!5 � � '�j, �,.`?"'i4 a � i � �*x i• � 1:, k ,�!' .:
?p,} ,. L
Ni pc :T� f y✓. 8 1
�,
y yM 4x
��j
4T
ra�yqr
nth
y 9
ARCHAEOLOGICALLY
SENSITIVE
j
4"
AREA
Y
{
A
31NH444
y
`
4,
lk
3
�1 ti
s ,
Y
a rn
NO
�?
'
VL
7 �
•
r
,
orA
Y
FORT FISHER PIER
F�. ATLAN T/ C OCEAN
`V NEER QUA►6ffY CLASS Al' l0N-SB
a
*,..
•
LEGEND
FLOOD HAZARD AREA-100 YEAR
FLOOD PLAIN (toA" ZONES)
FLOOD HAZARD AREA ("V"' ZONES)
AND OCEAN ERODIBLE AEC
ESTUARINE SHORELINE AEC
® HISTORIC / ARCHITECTURAL SITE
N ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE
.h.
�A
yv.
k
xr
f4hrf
flea
"g
ht
A 1
04
t
R F�W
r
n
3
ro 3 S
� k
y} �T
x
5-
r+
<q �•
a!
k
4
r.
b � •r
SYMBOL DATE OE3CRtpTt9N i1f
REV 4SION S
1990 LAND USE PLAN UPDATE , {~
KIIAE BEACH, NC
k
FLOOD HAZARD 1% FRAGµ. A
€y
+t
Ham. Y VON OEM A AnOM
CONSULTM ENt3NMERS i PLANNEI -'
so NORTH 7wD STREET
VIRLMMTON NORTH CAROLM 2*W '
DES F1LA
NO.
DRwN ,
MQf— #
CHKti1,Ei
E
!'
k
s`
r" = 300, $
, ij
DATE+. f�
,Y

,�• } mot- r�; `
w
THE PREPARATION OF THIS MAP -WAS FINANCED IN PART THROUGH A GRANT
PROVIDED BY THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM THROUGb
FUNDS PROVIDED BY THE COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1972, AS AMENDED,
WHICH IS ADMINISTERED BY THE OFFICE OF OCEAN AND COASTAL RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT, N.O.A.A,
R R
I�ER
FEA
pE
GP
:::P.
r::.::.:::::::•::::......:::.;::::.; :.•:..:..
CONSERVATION •...................................t..........�................�.......�.................
...................................
ATLANT/C OCEAN
SUNNY POINT MILITARY
OCEAN TERMINAL
LEGEND
%//////////////, — QEVELOPED: BUSINESS
DEVELOPED: RESIDENTIAL
URBAN TRANSITION: BUSINESS
URBAN TRANSITION: RESIDENTIAL
CONSERVATION

I I III I I Il ullllIl ,111. III I III III IIIII I III Ill II .��II I LI 11 II I I II III .�Iu1 ll . I I r ,...�.mm�l-m.I.11- III ru Il.l n..lryyy.� l II I Il..umr- um-uul .nlr-I lu In .ml-n.-,- ,.,.,,,. nr Ill u..-um.,-,I wn.-I.l nu u.111p�1 n�- III lollI I- I Ill IIIIIII IIII.IIIIIIII.II.II=II. IIIIIIII II I- I IIIIII III. II I.II.I Ill I II I.I IIII III-II.I I I I IIII,II II III -I- II IIIIII IIIIILIl1111�1. III I I I II I I II 11 I I I I I I I I 1111111
11
11
I,r p1'I I• , J, II .1 1.r;ll1•' 1 r `, , 1 1 J I .I I " I ,, I I II . ." I I II + ,Y I V ^I II `
. I I
i I I
. . .l . l
11 1 � . I l, I
pl l II I ,+ ., �•' „ I I 1, I ' I I I I I II ' I I . I 1, . * . , I I , - i II
. �
. � II I .
I �, I I
I
.. I
I
r I 1 II
I I
I,
II I
II' I ,
II ,
4 11 ' l ,
I
I
I I
I I I
II
I I
I
III ill
I u
A 1 11
I I
1
1 I
i
�I
I
I
I ,
'I
44 I
1
' I I
I
I,
II
I
I
I I I I I
I I
`I
I .
I,,
' I
I I I
I I
'
, I
, . I .
I
I.
f 1
1 I 1,
' ,
I '
I I '
I' I 11 I
I I
I I I
I , I
' ' 'i
1 "
.
II
,
...II
II
I II 1
III I I I I
I I'
o
I
I
I
I I�
I
I. I I
I ,
, I I
I I I '
l -
I I
411I IIIII 1, II I ,P I, . 11 I
I I
' ' , ' ' I
I
THEI PREPARATION'OF�THIS MAP WAS FINANCED IN'PART THROUGH A GRANT I I I I I
I I I I I ,' I I I I I I I I I ' 1 I I I `I I
I I PROVIDED BY THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL 'MANAGEMENT PROGRAM THROUG3 I I ' ' I
I I .
FUNDS PROVIDED BYITHE COASTAL BONE MANAGEMENT ACT.OF 1972� AS'AMENDED,, I
11 11.' I I 1 • R
' ' I ' WHICH I S ','.' ADMI N I STERD BY 1`HE OFFICE bF, OCEAN AND COASTAL RESOURCE 1 I I I I F
I MANAGEMENTy N10,AIAI 1' I I' I I I ` RiVER +e�
P E f, 9,F
I I I . I I I i 'A
'Qi)0� `
I I ' ' I FLOpD �'4i\.
I .1
. I , I I illI I II ,I '
I I I I I I
,,
I
I I I I I ' I I ,
..
I I I I 1, ...r ' I I' I I I I I I
•
•� . . I . I I � I
10
I • 1
• I ,
I 0 I I I I I ,. I
I I I I .
A
D
.
01
Y DCW y R�
I I I I •,I I I I .0 0 1 I . I I 1A .14
• I
I 1
• I
I • 1
• 1
•
II III 10
• • I •.,. I..-•.. I 1 I
II I • I I . I
n, I I
• I
I • I
•
•
•
I I �• 1
A o CONSERVATION' I
I I I I I I
'.0 n I II
. • I
I • .
' I I I : I F I
10
I I I III '' I I. • I !1, 1
• .
.. ':: .. • I I . .
• .. .... ! • . •'►''.
• I I •.••...• ... .. . •..,•
I • I ,
:':: •'!
• .1 •:
I I a 1 ,,: ;, • f
1$ •
'.L. ..
•
f AV'�
•.•
•.5'• • Z
•--.:--*l..
E. • '.•: ..
9 t .'' RAY
• "i
,;,, ,.r
'ti ::•
•
.;ti,
:r t
1 ..
I .
.r•I. •r
%: Isil'• 1:
�S: ..
I 'Y
..
:.
:i�
:'�'.:'
..! .'.
:•
:,
1
•1 ;,,.:.
'1
I r
':;. �'
•f'
J'
;: :Y
V E.
•.. ••
A ii I �r
I
h T t !. e w
�t:' N
W N �i:
:: t IN
r T 0 .•
.::.
;t.
.;: ;fit; C •.
•:L
.;:;:;:
:1•: •:.5I.
:.•
::� ::L
:'.. �i
:t�
:. :..:
i
• ::•:�::.' 1
':,
:�:
,. :�: 9,3....,L I
:: • • :.
5:
A . j • J;;
V I
.•.
:it ;r,` K RA ci� ! -,. MAC E L
L•:
___
�:.�:
I il f ..• '•Y'•r'': •..
' •n
A. :r;;
L
'•I'•: :'!• :i
. ••• A
:iii
:1' •.•
, r.5. 1 . ., 11.11 La . J
:fi•: ili.; ; �:
IT�� :r': 1:
'71:,. r4::
:L::
1.':f
'1
•,• ; : ;••
,, I.
:•�.•::': -::::
n ':.
1•
r •�Iiil
( 1'.I•
'' r ..1T. •}u I
i,:': q;;;:'
t } .. ... If7. J1. l i'.':ji'ji'::itt.P1 :'q;'•'"1''l.i; t; •''''•"' 11.1:''. ;';'Y,::::;I{: ,i; ' •':`1 ;: •: •:� ::'.�.: •`•:: '•�:: �:•::•.� :•::: '•t •. �:;:; •:. .. •' ..,•
a.V.} : f;
. E_� -'�Ijj' P '•, is ;•�;;;::'
1 ar::': I'd '.
I .i 1. Ir
. j: i. �.i:... 7 .
•: .
•.:
V
B I TA
r.
• fJ• . r.' :7
1:•
ON
4°liiti yi jE:;. .
d':
M.
l .1..... { ..
.
:.•r:::::: .: t::::: : :.
t
.I r:i ::j
:i�' r
•:7v. .1
ik}
::'r: :::;:.;..
r
d
r.
. :...}::. i. ;:::
y• v r ' 1 .'
t . {•:,::� ;i�':: a '•l :
1. 7..
.0
.f . b .. .., .. 7. .. , .. .. .:. { II �. r. t. ....I . , I
r r rP . :L . -i
:L•........:... ., .. L• .. r `°r1i'
...... ....I ., ... . ., • o. r.. I. Lt ..I.... ...,.I ..,:,•, �•1 n 1 r :v..
I 1. '3'': t••:•
r:
t
••1. r ':Y: ::
•n .,. .: •Y I I
I � tr' :i�� � :3' J •
IA '1�'• I: rr V ;:j jp! :{i': ::L
::1 •: •:, :, ,::�i: • •�.
i •i•:
Y, A
. .... ..,•{•,:. .pE;lii;y:'•'•':::i'.°::..: :'arl•{:TI"'';:{'f'::'t':'•{?i::'i�,t�.}'... .. t. •.. .... .:' ..,•'. '•i!.;.'' i• ,�:.:::'•: °�,a�':it�tt�. �'' •r :, :; :' •'• •.. ••• .• ... .... .. ..
i:S j •:•P•• :•I::i '�i �'ili:: r. :3 Pit :''Y''' .':i:.;: :i W I
I I �::i:k: � . I .
.:ti,.t :ir: ,,.
I
I jibs r
tt
•: 1 kf L'•'
(:;y`;• .:•tj. :; �': ..},. +}b.•i 'r,'i,(•: ..: :•jo+' .ij:;. :'ir,.: ri{. '• C•t;:,:•'• t••i:.. •.: �:.;;:' :y:. •• �''(`";; '' �;(:�,::::�: ti:::,,,•,� ••:•�`••
L
iLt : I:: '• :''• ! ' 1 ' .'jl: .:1' ' ':
':1':. ':1:'
:j7:' ': j:;jj� :•
1•• 1
j�r• . . ..... .. .. t. I. ... .....
7 r. ( • I
.. .. I. ...I ..r .. .. ..L..
.
. 7 , C�
.. ..... .. I . 1 r .. ... . I..'. •'Cir:i1 ''�.
.. .. .. ... ,. ,. ..... ,.I •::
.. ... ,
1 •-r•1•y ::: ti •' '• f •
f L
f A*IL
... .. .. ... .. .. .. �. I..:
.... ' i .. ..:.:
. 71. L v.. ':1.'': • 1 I . r. r• ► .. r I .......... .... . }.. .t •T
... .. .. .. ,1, .. .. .. ., .. '::�
r r. 4
r. y } � •1 ,. I f 1 I (
, r . S.
1 t
r .t .1.
,
I. .. .. .. .. , .I 1, ....... !.
L e ,. 11 �D'
.{ 1 1
f 1
k ...Illy .1 •. 5:: t ;:.
{...
1•,� •:ti'•• :j7:. .r.1
::k • 7 :•i
7 7
i
1 7 •:'
... .. • .. .. .... 1. f.. •I ..
1
, r.
1 ^.1
r. 7 I, I
i . 1
t 1 ,.
.. .. ... .. .. .I .. .7 t .. .. r.. I... r
I 1 .,1
: 1 7 � i r d. t7 • 1 :'• •' .. .. .. .. .. .1 .. , .....
1 i 1. 'ti�' L
1 }
f .r I. L
r
:�t,. ..Aif. • 7
k..;i f;:
�r :�L
. 5•
•. 1•
qI
•i' , .
.....}
r
i :ii '1
r: ::L^ ii
::i r; ;k
I t l '3• is :,Z . '..: .
::J.: :•I.. '
:7
:t. •I.
t•
'sir:
�1 ��
'•Y'r
a": :fa
1. .tit:• : ::l
,• •:. r. .
I •'1
1•
1.
Y
;t .•
k i..
{::
.:r''•::::' 'i. 1': :I
i
.1.
:7 ' J
4r. ,Ili;}i::
:'t
;. .; ...yt.y .. ..
AR. � 9 � . c I I I I I. •i. �:: :.
I
Y
::
t. �.
j:
:::
I { t:
:�. ;�:
•kti :
�' .:' : 'i
•'r;: .x:.: I ..
w
I N •�:
" CONSERVATION
. I `}`' AT A I CONS ,
I , 111111IIIII$ II,IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII/IIIIIIIIIIIIItI11111111111t11111111I11$111iv1/1/1111$$1111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111IIIIIIIt111t11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11 1111111111111I1111111111111111111111 •
I t -_ - CONSERVATION
SNAPPER
. I wn$I$utnnnt$uttntttttutntnn$ntnutttntnnnt$nunnn�i.��- - -
I I I � I I I --
I I I I I II I III I' '11 I I ,
I I I
' I I, 1 I I I I l I I .
1. I
r I Ill r I ' I ' I '
I I I II I I I. LEGEND $
' I //////////////,- DEVELOPED: BUSINESS
I I /
�i?Ii.."...+r:: +;t•'�,j1.`L:`:'j:'::::' DEVELOPED: RESIDENTIAL
I I I I ,' I I I `Pi:..,;.;;' Ili:;.;.. ,.. :.^7; ;.
I I I I I } 1 ..... ,Pi:i::k:•.tCt'•:1•$'i:::i:::i
i" I II I I ATLANTIC OCEAN
I I, I I I
- URBAN TRANSITION: BUSINESS
';:,+;., ..;;.;.:,...m URBAN TRANSITION: RESIDENTIAL
•::'
•ti
I I II I .1II I I I, '
IIII I CONSERVATION II 1 I ,
V I • I I I i
, 1' I I
I I 1 I
1
4
' I I 1
' r1 r r ` \,III '
I I I 1, , „I I .. . I H I il I ' I '1 • I n 'I 'I I. I I I III ,
I
I j
. 11
I I
I I I I
I I
I P
11
1'
"11
I i
I
Ill I 'I
I'II
,i II111
II I
I I
II
II
II'l' r
Ii
, I
1
li I .
i
I
jil
I ' ' I L
yI, w'
„', I, 1'
"II II
{ II. I
I
M
,
j
'I
I, I I I.
I
'II II
�Ii
, 1
II' I
I I
I'
I.
I I '
',iI'r
Ill l ,
1
IPI I 'I'
I
II
1' It',
ll
II
I'
Ij,
All
I } l
I 11'
I
I I'
7., I .
1, I
t
I I
II.
5
I. r
1
1
MI
,I
,1
,
I,
I.
r
II I
I i II I
II
e!
11
.
' I
i
�I
Il
I I
11
II
II Ill
4' II
,;
II I
1
11 I
I
'I
1
If11
11
I I
' ,l.'1 ' Ill I l k 1.
, I'
I I
I
I '11'I'I'lllll'
I' 11 1, o I