Capital Improvements Plan-1997

Town of Kill Devil Hills
North Carolina
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN 1997
(WePs 1997)
WILLIAM C. OVERMAN ASSOCIATES. P.C.
Engineer • Planners
.�...,.. 380 Cleveland Place • Virginia Beach, Va. 23462

It
Town of Kill Devil Hills, North Carolina
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
PAGE NO.
VIII. DEPARTMENTAL PROJECTS --DESCRIPTIONS AND EVALUATIONS : . . . . .
VIII-I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
A. Introduction .....
.....
Vill-1
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
B. Administration (AD) ....:.:..
YIII-3
`: '."
`
C Finance and Tax (FT) .. .
TABLE OF CONTENTS : ..: • . : .. . : :
.... 1
D. ; Finance - Management Information S ystems
(F-MIS)
VI II 11
E . . . .
Ploannlnlice
VIII 13 ,
LIST OF EXHIBITS :
111 ..
`�PL... ....
.
YIII 17
Police - Animal Control (PD AC)
VIII 28 `
LIST OF APPENDICES : ..
tv
H Fire (FD)
I Beach Reslnlstatton
YIII 31
,1Fire*-
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . : V/�� M) s "'^
v
J. Publld Works (PY A)
VIII 43 _
K. Public Works - Public Buildings (PW PB)
.' .
YIII 48
INTRODUCT[ON
viij
L ` Public Works = Streets (PW-S) and Powell
'
Bill (PW POB) :
YIII 60
M. Public Works Solid Was
- ( -S
�
I 'PLANNING METHODOLOGY
- stratlonW(U-YA)
N. .Utilities Water Administration
YIII 100
..z _
0 Utilities - Water Plant (U-WP) `.
r . :
VIII 108
lI. INVENTORY AND CONDITION OF EXISTING CAPITAL STOCK . .': . .
::. II-1
P. ' Utilities -Water Systems (U-YS) . . .
VIII-130
".
Q. Utilities Wastewater (U WW) ..
'.`.
-
YIII 130
III. "GROWTH TRENDS .. . . . . : : . '.
III-1
- RECOMMENDED CAPITAL PROJECTS . . . . .
. IX-1 `
'
IV. EXISTING REVENUES AND SOURCES ' . . : . . ..:. . :.
.. IV-1:IX.-
-
.. , . . -,-. ... ., ,
X. FISCAL IMPACT OF RECOMMENDED PROJECTS . . . .
. . . . . .
._-X 1
Y. FISCAL IMPACTS OF GROWTH . . . :..
Y-1
_
_. . VI. CAPITAL PRDJECT EVALUATION CRITERIA .'. . .
VI-1
XI. REVENUE GENERATING ALTERNATIVES . . . . . . .
. .
XI-1
A. Introduction rR . .
VI-1
A. Introduction ....... ..
B. Gifts, Endowments, and Donations
.'XI-1
XI -I
B. Service Level Considerations . . . .
. .. VI-1
C.' ',Dare County Tourist Bureau
XI-1
C. Land Use Plan Policy Considerations . ..
. VI-2
D. Intergovernmental Agreements ........
....
XI-1
D. - Departmental Goal Considerations ... ... ....
VI-2
E. ' Federal and State Grants and Loans
. XI -I
E. " Timing Considerations . :'. ... :'.':
VI-2
_
F. Public Private Partnerships . . .
. . . . . . .
_ -
. XI -I
F. Project Interdependence Considerations. . . . . .
. . . VI-2
G. Special Assessments/Revenue Sharing .
. . . .
XI-2
G. Long Term Fiscal Impact Considerations .
. . . VI-2
H. ` Facility or Impact Fees ..................
XI-2
H. Cost Effectiveness Considerations .
YI-2
I. User Fees ....... .
. X[-2
I. State or Federal Mandates or Initiatives Considerations
. VI-3
.
J. Leasing . ...
.
. XI-2
J. Special Considerations
.. VI-3
-
K. Bonds • • . • • • . • . • •
... • .. •
: XI-2
L. Ad Valorem Taxes . . . . . . .
. . . . .
. XI-2
YII. TARGETED AREAS OF IMPROVEMENTS
VII-1
A. Introduction
. YII-1
XII. CONCLUSION ..........................
XII-I
B. Land Use Plan Update
VII-1
SOURCES CONSULTED
C. Street Improvement Master Plan . . . . . . . . . . . .
VII-1
D. Stormwater Management Plan .........
. YII4
APPENDICES
E. Shoreline Access Plan . . . . . . . . ..
VII-2
F. Recreational Facilities Plan ...............
YII-2
G. Vehicle Replacement Plan . ......
YII-3
l2
m�:ur
n*� Mmmi.nr
SOS

111'
LIST OF APPENDICES
LIST OF EXHIBITS
PAGE NO.
PAGE NO.
APPENDIX 1 Capital Improvements Plan Summary of Public Meetings
'Capital'
AI-1
EXHIBIT 1
-Town of Kill Devil Hills North Carolina Fixed Asset
APPENDIX 2 Improvement Plan (C.I.P.)) Departmental Capital
p
Inventory Totals Year to Date by Line Item Ending
Need/Project Listing: Public Vorks Streets/PublicWorks
June 30, 1996
II 2
-Powell Bill Street Projects (PW 5-97-07 through
PY S 97-205) =
p A2-1
EXHIBIT 2
-.Town of Kill Devil HillsNorth Carolina Fixed Asset
rt "
Inventory Totals Year to Date by Transaction Type,
APPENDIX 3 Improvement Plan (C.I.P.) Departmental Capital
Ending June 30 1996
II 3
1
,Capital
Need/Project Listing: Public Works Buildings --
" "
Access Projects (PW-PB-97-17 through PW-PB-97-29) -
A3-I
EXHIBIT 3
.Town of Kill Devil Hills North Carolina Population
c
_`1984.wp,199 4
III-2
EXHIBIT 4 ::"Town
of Kill Devil "gill' s; North Carollna'Conitruction
and Bank Deposits,'Last 10 Fiscal Years
III-3
EXHIBIT 5
Town of Kill Devil Hills, North Carolina Population Projects III-5
EXHIBIT 6
Town of Kill Devil Hills, North Carolina General" Fund
Revenues and Other. Financing Sources, last 10 fiscal years
IV-2
EXHIBIT 7
-Town of Kill Devil Hills North Carolina Budget Ordinance
IV-3
EXHIBIT 8 '
General Fund Revenue Projections
V-2
EXHIBIT 9 "
General Fund Expenditure Projections ""_ ;
V-3
_
EXHIBIT 10
General Fund Surplus Projections .. 7
V-4
EXHIBIT 11
Town of Kill Devil Hills, North Carolina Fleet -Vehicles .:
and "Equipment Anticipated Replacement Schedule
VII-{
EXHIBIT 12
Capital Project Evaluation Criteria
VIII-2
EXHIBIT 13
Financial Implications of Recommended Capital Projects
_
X-2
I
" v�wM.cn
VWX—Cn iv .

DRAFT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Greg Loy, planning Director Town of Kill Devil hills
FROM: John A. Thayer Jr. AICP, NE DCM District Planner
DATE: February 27, 1997
REF: Review of Draft Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
I have completed a review of your Draft CIP document. The following are my
comments, suggestions, and questions which I hope will help update the draft
and assist you and the Town decision makers in using the document. The
general emphasis of my comments will be to both encourage a stronger clear
linkage between this document and the LUP, as well as foster its ongoing
usability.
Several important sections of the Plan have yet to be completed, which I
believe are vital to the readability and use of the document. In progress
sections are the "Executive Summary", and the "Conclusion" chapters.
Originally your program included the aim of identifying or establishing "level
of service" criteria. I appreciate the difficulty in attempting to do so in a small
town which has significant service needs driven by a highly seasonal
population. Since one of the stated purposes of the Plan has not been uto
establish development impact fees", such criteria is not as critical to the
usability of the document. I am not suggesting no service indicators have
been used, just they are not spelled out in a formal or objective manner. I
would encourage on going efforts to establish "level of service" indicators to
assist you in determining when certain facilities or services are deficient or
needed.
My comments are broken down by chapters or sections on the attached
pages.

Kill Devil Hills CIP.com-2.
February 27, 1997
Comments: "Draft Town of Kill Devil Hills CIP 1997" Document
The following comments are arranged following listed chapter or section
headings. The headings will be in bold, followed by page reference.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (page v)
You have stated that this section would be completed following review of an
updated version of this document by the Planning Board and Town Council.
What "is" provided appears to be a mixture of overview, conclusions and
statements broken down by chapter. It is confusing ....... might read better if
the paragraphs were bulleted statements with chapter in brackets at end of
statements?
A suggestion, what may also be helpful, for the reader, would be to identify
several questions or issues which will be attempted to be addressed or
answered in the document. These same issues and questions could be
revisited in the conclusion chapter.
INTRODUCTION (page viii)
May I suggest that it may be better locate here, an outline of the documents
organization, verses attempting it in the "Executive Summary" chapter. Also
would recommend that some effort be put into providing a section as to how
to use the document.
Assuming the purpose of the document is not to adopt development impact
fees: You may wish to qualify, or note to readers, that the level of detail and
precision of the information contained in the document is appropriate for and
consistent with the level of detail necessary for developing a draft budget and
Planning strategies, but not detailed enough for either final capital
improvement program budget approval (ex. need pre -engineering) or is it
sufficient for the purposes of establishing nexus required for impact fees.
Like wise you may wish to consider use of the term "scenario", where
appropriate in the first paragraph on page vii. For example:... "is a financial
scenario document that outlines... ". "...provides estimates of costs, a
scheduling of projects scenario, prioritization...". Also you would also wish to
avoid any implying any schedule calculation is speck.
2

Kill Devil Hills CIP.com-2.
February 27, 1997
Terms used should be defined. Special attention should be given to terms
probably unfamiliar to the average citizen, for example: rolling stock, used in
the last paragraph. Suggest only defining key terms in the text discussions
or foot notes, relying on a section in the appendices to define other terms
frequently used.
PLANNING METHODOLOGY (I-1)
This overview may be better folded into the "Introduction".
My only comment here is to note that nowhere in the document have I seen
levels of service assumptions used or the challenge discussed. For example,
usually capital investment and operating expenses are based on three or
more related considerations:
a. Growth- population, employment, number of units/bedrooms, land use
changes anticipated in the LUP; and,
b. Rate of Utilization- amount or level of each service necessary to
accommodate a given level of population, employment, seasonally; and,
c. Level of Service Standards- for certain services, a standard or quality of
service used to translate basic demand into targeted level of service
delivery. Most all services except water, sewer, storm drainage can be
regulated using level of service standards.
Where have you outlined the findings, assumptions and conclusions used in
determining need, forecasts, trends etc. for facilities listed?
INVENTORY AND CONSITION OF EXISTING CAPITAL STOCK (page II-1)
Evidently the Exhibits represent totals per Department. An overview of what
some of those totals represent, using a department example would assist the
user in understanding this chapter. It would be helpful if this chapter was
cross referenced with Chapter VIII, if appropriate. Can any findings,
conclusions be made from this Exhibit which would be helpful to the reader.

Kill Devil Hills CIP.com-2.
February 27, 1997
GROWTH TRENDS (page IH-4)
Suggest concluding chapter with list of findings, needs or assumptions
resulting from the forecast analysis related to population, dwelling units,
commercial sq. footage which are used elsewhere in the Plan.
EXISTING REVENUES AND SOURCES (page IV-1)
Suggest concluding chapter with list of findings or assumptions which will be
used in the CIP. What should be important for the reader in this section.
FISCAL IMPACT OF GROWTH (page V-1)
Suggest providing explanation of "general fund revenue". Here may be a
good place to outline an example of how the amount for one item say
property tax 1999 was developed... any assumptions or conclusions used.
Wouldn't need to be exhaustive. Example assumes certain value, based on
assumption of units, based on tax rate example=$. Same approach example
for expenditures.
CAPITAL PROJECTS EVALUATION CRITERIA (page VI-1)
Page VI-1, "B. Service Level Considerations": How was or will be unsatisfactory
levels of service determined by the Committee? Was any objective criteria
identified or used whereby some determinations, findings and conclusions
could be revisited later or annually?
Page VI-2. "C. LUP Policy Considerations" and "D. Departmental Goal
Considerations": Were you able to keep notes of Committees determinations?
Point systems imply an exactness, since you have broken down the point
system per sub topics, you may wish to qualify its use was to assist in coming
up with a relative ranking and that there is a subjective aspect to the
methodology.
"E. Timing Considerations" : What is the timeline assumption of + and - ? Is it
pre or post next 5 years, or 2010?
"G. Long Tenn Fiscal Impact": Should clarify what you mean by impact. For
example... if no project (facility) results in a constraint to development.
Project will result in positive impact, example generates revenue.
4

Kill Devil Hills CIP.com-2.
February 27, 1997
TARGET AREAS OF IMPROVEMENTS (page VII-1)
"B. LUP Update": You reference the workshop 11/96 "Vision 2010" several
places in the document. Are the facilities/LUP linkages discussed, only those
provided in sections "C" through "G" or are there other facilities and services
which were also covered for which some statements, assumptions, issues,
findings or determinations. Can any of these be incorporated into this
document to serve to illustrate or demonstrate the linkages between capital
improvements and the forth coming land use plan update?
"C. Street Improvement Master Plan": Since this document was used to score
roadway project priorities, I would suggest you note it several other places in
the document. For example: in the EXECUTIVE SUMMARY and in Chapter VI.
Since section "D." states, stormwater improvements are linked to road
priorities, should note how they were or not reflected in the scoring process.
Is or are the previously ranked projects listed, and ranked anywhere in the
document? If so note where. Can not problem drainage areas still be listed
as to priority independently of road projects?
Should consider clarifying what you mean by "street improvements", is it
primarily maintenance, or first time improvements?
DEPARTMENTAL PROJECTS -DESCRIPTIONS & EVALUATIONS (page VI I I-1)
The worksheet/scoring pages (example VIII-5) are somewhat self
explanatory, however some explanation as to .......sq. ft. assumption of
annex....... absence of $ allocation is due to decisions not having been
made?
Page VIII-16: you may wish to be clearer as to when certain
costs/improvements are listed under one department versus being broken
down under several departments..or the assumptions thereof.
The issue of cost to benefit in prioritization needs to be visited in some
manner. Service ratio considerations or cost per dwelling unit/bedroom or
per sq. ft. etc. is one approach.
Issue of when to use/include personnel costs and how ongoing 0&M costs
would/can be identified generally.
Clarity of planning period horizon 12 or 13 years?

Kill Devil Hills CIP.com-2.
February 27, 1997
RECOMMENDED CAPITAL PROJECTS (page IX-1)
Why are not the roadways listed here? Any summary and trend statements,
or important assumptions which can be recognized here. May be desireable
to fold in some statements from Chapter X.
FISCAL IMPACT OF RECOMMENDED PROJECTS (page X-1)
Explain this is a scenario....as outlined.
Shouldn't there be some discussion here or elsewhere of how significant the
land area is/needed to accomplish some of the facility needs .... is it large
enough whereby some assumptions of loss of property taxes needs
consideration??
REVENUE GENERATING ALTERNATIVES (page XI-1)
What about other joint operations approaches... example regional fire fighting
authority?.... other services easier to gear up for seasonally?
The orientation of the listing of options should avoid using terms like should
and use can instead. Outlining several pros and cons is appropriate for each
alternative. Applicability to certain facilities or services should be
recognized.
CONCLUSION (page XII-1)
States it will be based on recommendations. Would suggest including
discussion of where do you go from here, what's the next step?
Recommend some effort be made to identify policy aims and guides
suggested for this documents use in conjunction with annual budgeting and
how it should be used in LUP review and development decisions.

+� William C. Overman Associates, P.C. Engineers. Planners
December 31, 1996
Mr. John A. Thayer, Jr. A.I.C.P.
District Planner
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Health
and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
1367 U.S. 17 South
Elizabeth City, North Carolina 27909
Re: Transmittal of Draft Entitled
"Town of Kill Devil Hills Capital
Improvements Plan"
Dear Mr. Thayer:
Enclosed are two copies of the draft "Town of Kill Devil Hills Capital
Improvements Plan" for your review. These are being submitted as per the
agreement between the State of North Carolina and the Town of Kill Devil
Hills, dated August 31, 1995 (F-6059).
• As you are aware, the Planning Board, Board of Commissioners, the Capital
Improvements Advisory Committee, and Staff have worked diligently the past
several months to prepare this draft, and it represents the best effort to
date for the document.
For your ease of review, we have included some of the page numbers that
correspond to or reference the activities by element specified in the
aforementioned agreement.
If you have any questions, please contact either Greg Loy or me.
Very truly yours,
WILLIAM.0 E N ASSOCIATES,..P.C..
74
0
By
, vv .., ri. a . W. a .
WRT:css
Enclosure
cc: Mr. W. Gregory Loy, Planning Director
380 Cleveland Place - Virginia Beach, VA 23462-6529 U.S.A.
Telephones: [phone] - [phone]
Telecopier. (757) 6717599 • E-Mail: overman®livenet.net

PRODUCTS EXPECTED AT END OF FIRST QUARTER:
1.
Hold a joint meeting with the Planning Board, Board of Commissioners,
This
and Staff to help set the guidelines for the CIP process. meeting
should establish, but is not limited to, a definition as to what
constitutes a capital improvement. Page I-1.
2.
Define the term Capital Improvement and establish a level of service
with regards to major capital outlays. Inventory and survey the
condition of the Town's existing capital stock based on the definition
rendered from the above process. Page viii.
3.
Establish a Capital Improvements Committee which may include elected
officials, appointed officials, and Town staff. Page I-1.
4.
Analysis of growth trends (residential and commercial). Forecast trends
base on population projects. Page III-1 through III-6.
5.
Forecast revenue over a fifteen year period. Page V-2 through V-4.
6.
Meet with the Town department heads to get detailed requests for capital
expenditures. This shall include a water and sewer needs analysis as
identified by the 1993 Land Use Plan Update. Page VIII-1 through VIII-
138.
7.
Conduct a public meeting. Page I-1.
PRODUCTS EXPECTED AT END OF SECOND QUARTER
1.
Review existing plans to identify targeted areas for improvements. Page
•
VII-1.
2.
Analyze, forecast, and predict the fiscal and capital impacts of growths
based on growth trends and existing capital stock. Page V-1.
3.
Determine detailed capital improvement requests from department heads
based on information established in the first quarter. Page VIII-1
through VIII-138.
4.
Analyze the effects of future capital expenditures on forecasted
budgets. Page X-1.
5.
Evaluate funding alternatives including facility fees, bonds, long-term
leasing and increased in ad valorem taxes. Page XI-1.
PRODUCTS EXPECTED AT END OF THIRD QUARTER
1.
Conduct a fiscal impact.analysis of projected capital improvements.
Compare and analyze projected expenses and projected tax revenues. Page
X-1.
2.
Review department head requests, establish a priority system rand in
order of priority and recommendations for funding. Page IX-1.
3.
Create a draft CIP.
4.
Hold a public meeting to obtain citizen input. Page'Page I-1.
PRODUCTS EXPECTED AT END OF FOURTH QUARTER
1.
Review the draft plan and amend as necessary.
2.
Have a final draft ready for adoption by Board of Commissioners.

• ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
F. DUNCAN WRIGHT, MAYOR
E.M. "COY" HARBESON, MAYOR PRO-TEM
JAMES D. HANKS
WILLIAM R. MORRIS JR.
JEFFREY D. SHIELDS
PLANNING BOARD
WILLIAM SCHMIDT, CHAIRMAN
JOHN D. GLADDEN, VICE CHAIRMAN
BOB COMBS II
JOHN I. ROBEY III
RAY STURZA
SHERRY ROLLASON
E. MICHAEL MURRAY
The Board of Commissioners and Planning Board wish to express their
gratitude to all of the people who gave of their time and talent to make
this Capital Improvement Plan a success. Special thanks to the Ad Hoc
Capital Improvement Plan Committee members:
Ms. Debora P. Diaz, Town Manager
Mr. William G. Loy, Director of Planning and Development
Mrs. Teresa Pickrel, Director of Finance and Tax
Mr. Bob Combs II
Mr. William Pitt
Mr. Howard Kimbell
Mr. William R. Turner, Jr.
Mr. William Schmidt
Special thanks to the department heads and staffs for their input with
respect to capital needs in the Town for the next 15 years. In addition
to the aforementioned Ms. Diaz, Mrs. Pickrel, and Mr. Loy, thanks go to
Mr. Charles Smith, Director of Public Works, Mr. Darrell Merrell,
Director of Utilities, Mr. Doug Penland, Fire Chief, and Mr. Michael
Harris, Acting Police Chief for their help. Thanks also to Ms. Miranda
Darden, Planning Intern, for her research work.
Preparation of this document was financed in part by a grant provided by
the North Carolina Coastal Management Program, through funds provided by
the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended,•which is
administered by the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management,
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
WRT\KDH.CIP

Town of Kill Devil Hills, North Carolina
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Page No.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . i
LIST
OF EXHIBITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .
LIST
OF APPENDICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . iv
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . v
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . vi i i
I.
PLANNING METHODOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . I-1
II.
INVENTORY AND CONDITION OF EXISTING CAPITAL STOCK . . . . . . .
. . II-1
III.
GROWTH TRENDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. III-1
IV.
EXISTING REVENUES AND SOURCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . IV-1
V.
FISCAL IMPACTS OF GROWTH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . V-1
VI.
CAPITAL PROJECT EVALUATION CRITERIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . VI-1
A. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . VI-1
B. Service Level Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . VI-1
C. Land Use Plan Policy Considerations . . . . . . . . . . .
. . VI-2
D. Departmental Goal Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . VI-2
E. Timing Considerations . . . . . . . . . . .
. VI-2
F. Project Interdependence Considerations . . . . . . . . .
. . VI-2
G. Long Term Fiscal Impact Considerations . . . . . . . . .
. . VI-2
H. Cost Effectiveness Considerations . .
�Considerations
. VI-2
I. State or Federal Mandates or Initiatives .
. . VI-3
J. Special Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . VI-3
VII. TARGETED AREAS OF IMPROVEMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-1
A. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-1
B. Land Use Plan Update . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-1
C. Street Improvement Master Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-1
D. Stormwater Management Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII=2
E. Shoreline Access Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-2
F. Recreational Facilities Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-2
G. Vehicle Replacement Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-3
WRT%KDH.CIP

PAGE NO.
VIII.
DEPARTMENTAL PROJECTS --DESCRIPTIONS AND EVALUATIONS . . . . .
. VIII-1
A.
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. VIII-1
B.
Administration (AD) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
VIII-3
C.
Finance and Tax (FT) . . . . .. . . .
VIII-9
D.
Finance - Management Information Systems (F-MIS) . . .
. VIII-11
E.
Planning (PLNG) . . . . .
. VIII-13
F.
Police (PD) . . .
. VIII-17
G.
Police - Animal Control (PD-AC) . . .
. VIII-28
H.
Fire (FD)
VIII-31
I.
Fire - Beach Rescue (FD-BR)
VIII-40
J.
Public Works - Administration (PW-A) . . . . . . . .
. VIII-43
K.
Public Works - Public Buildings (PW-PB) . . .
. VIII-48
L.
Public Works - Streets (PW-S) and Powell Bill (PW-POB)
. VIII-60
M.
Public Works - Solid Waste (PW-SW) . . . . . . . .
. VIII-82
N.
Utilities - Water Administration (U-WA) . . . . . . . .
. VIII-100
0.
Utilities - Water Plant (U-WP) . . . . . . . . . . . .
. VIII-107
P.
Utilities - Water Systems (U-WS) . . . . . . . . . . .
. VIII-118
Q.
Utilities - Wastewater (U-WW) . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. VIII-130
IX.
RECOMMENDED CAPITAL PROJECTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . IX-1
X.
FISCAL IMPACT OF RECOMMENDED PROJECTS . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . X-1
XI.
REVENUE GENERATING ALTERNATIVES . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . XI-1
A.
Introduction . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . XI-1
B.
Gifts, Endowments, and Donations . . . . . . . . . .
. . XI-1
C.
Dare County Tourist Bureau . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . XI-1
D.
Intergovernmental Agreements . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . XI-1
E.
Federal and State Grants and Loans . . . . . . . . .
. . XI-1
F.
Public -Private Partnerships . .
. . XI-1
G.
Special Assessments/Revenue Sharing
XI-2
H.
Facility or Impact Fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . XI-2
I.
User Fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . XI-2
J.
Leasing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . XI-2
K.
Bonds .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . XI-2
L.
Ad Valorem Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . XI-2
XII. CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . XII-1
SOURCES CONSULTED
APPENDICES
MRT\KDH.CIP i i

iii
LIST OF EXHIBITS
PAGE NO.
EXHIBIT 1 Town of Kill Devil Hills, North Carolina Fixed Asset
Inventory Totals, Year -to -Date by Line Item Ending
June 30, 1996 II-2
EXHIBIT 2 Town of Kill Devil Hills, North Carolina Fixed Asset
Inventory Totals, Year -to -Date by Transaction Type,
Ending June 30, 1996 II-3
EXHIBIT 3 Town of Kill Devil Hills, North Carolina Population
1984 - 1994 III-2
EXHIBIT
4
Town of
Kill
Devil Hills, North Carolina Construction
and Bank
Deposits, Last 10 Fiscal Years
III-3
EXHIBIT
5
Town of
Kill
Devil Hills, North Carolina Population Projects
III-5
EXHIBIT
6
Town of
Kill
Devil Hills, North Carolina General Fund
Revenues
and
Other Financing Sources, last 10 fiscal years
IV-2
EXHIBIT
7
Town of
Kill
Devil Hills, North Carolina Budget Ordinance
IV-3
EXHIBIT
8
General
Fund
Revenue Projections
V-2
EXHIBIT
9
General
Fund
Expenditure Projections
V-3
EXHIBIT
10
General
Fund
Surplus Projections
V-4
EXHIBIT
11
Town of
Kill
Devil Hills, North Carolina Fleet -Vehicles
and Equipment
Anticipated Replacement Schedule
VII-4
EXHIBIT
12
Capital
Project
Evaluation Criteria
VIII-2
EXHIBIT
13
Financial
Implications
of Recommended Capital Projects
X-2
MRT\KDH.CIP

•
is
LIST OF APPENDICES
PAGE NO.
APPENDIX 1 Capital Improvements Plan Summary of Public Meetings AI-1
APPENDIX 2 Capital Improvement Plan (C.I.P.) Departmental Capital
Need/Project Listing: Public Works Streets/Public Works
- Powell Bill -- Street Projects (PW-S-97-07 through
PW-S-97-205) A2-1
APPENDIX 3 Capital Improvement Plan (C.I.P.) Departmental Capital
Need/Project Listing: Public Works -Public Buildings --
Access Projects (PW-PB-97-17 through PW-PB-97-29) A3-1
WRT%KDH.CIP
iv

S EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This section will be expanded and completed upon review of the final Capital
Improvement Plan by the Town of Kill Devil Hills Planning Board and Board of
Commissioners.
Chapter I - Planning Methodology -
The Town of Kill Devil Hills Capital Improvements Plan was formatted and
intended to be a dynamic document which would effectively serve the Town for
fiscal decisions and planning purposes. The planning process involved the
creation of a capital improvements plan committee and much interaction between
the Board of Commissioners, Planning Board, Town staff, and citizenry.
Extensive opportunities for public participation were offered throughout the
process.
Chapter II - Inventory and Condition of Existing Capital Stock
The Town Finance and Tax Department prepares an annual report inventorying
fixed assets of the Town. Excerpts from the report are included in the
Capital Improvements Plan and indicate the department to which fixed assets
are assigned.
Chapter III - Growth Trends -
• The Town of Kill Devil Hills continues to grow. The population increased
approximately 41% from fiscal year 1986 through fiscal year 1995, averaging
approximately 5.4% population growth per year. A more conservative projection
of a moderate 3% growth rate per year for the next 15 years was projected
resulting in a year 2011 population of 7,760. The needs of this population
were analyzed with respect to the various departments' capital improvements
requests.
Building permit data has also been analyzed for the Town. In 1995 there were
approximately 4,348 single family structures in the Town. It is estimated
that between 1996 and the year 2011 an additional 1,040 new structures will be
constructed in the Town for a total of 5,388 structures. Based on platted
lots and building trends, North Carolina Electric Power estimates that the
total number structures in Kill Devil Hills at build -out will total 7,155.
Growth trends indicate that the Town will not achieve build -out during the 15
year planning period, but emphasis will be placed on redevelopment of existing
areas in Kill Devil Hills.
Chapter IV - Existing Revenues and Sources
The Town of Kill Devil Hills enjoys a favorable economic climate and a stable
local economy. The Town's economy is based on travel, tourism, and related
service industries. Retail sales and occupancy taxes increased approximately
10% during fiscal year 1995-1996. Growth projections were based on similar
increases anticipated during the planning period. Also included in this
chapter is the Town's budget ordinance which highlights the revenue sources
• available to the Town.
WRT%KDH.CIP v

• Chapter V - Fiscal Impact of Growth -
General fund revenue projections for the cumulative period 1997 - 2011 total
$143,116,000.00. Expenses for general fund expenditures for the same period
are anticipated to total $142,580,000.00, which leaves a general fund surplus
for the same period of about $536,000.
Chapter VI - Capital Project Evaluation Criteria -
Projects submitted for review by department heads were rated according to
service level considerations, land use plan policy considerations,
departmental goal considerations, timing considerations, project
interdependence considerations, long term fiscal impact considerations, cost
effectivness considerations, state or Federal mandates or initiatives
considerations, and special considerations. Point totals for each of the
considerations were assigned to each project by staff and committee members to
achieve a point total for each project to be rated against all other projects
submitted.
Chapter VII - Targeted Areas of Improvements
The Town of Kill Devil Hills has budgeted for certain capital programs. In
addition to street improvement master plans and related stormwater management
improvements, the Town has budgeted for capital programs for shoreline
accesses, recreational facilities, and land and buildings. A synopsis of each
• of the programs listed is included in this chapter. The Street Improvement
Master Plan contains nearly 200 projects for road improvements and related
stormwater improvements. These were not included in the departmental
listings, but are included in the appendix to the capital improvements plan.
Similarly, shoreline access projects are included in the shoreline access
plan. These projects were not included in the departmental rankings, but are
listed in the appendix to this capital improvements plan.
Chapter VIII - Departmental Projects - Descriptions and Evaluations
Sheets describing and evaluating 101 projects submitted by the various Town
departments make up this chpater. Department heads were interviewed and asked
for input on numerous occasions. Department profiles are also included.
Chapter IX - Recommended Capital Projects -
This chapter contains a listing of the recommended capital projects
prioritized according to the capital project rating criteria discussed in
Chapter VI.
Chapter X - Fiscal Impact of Recommended Projects -
The fiscal impact (financial implications) of the 101 recommended capital
improvements projects is included. To fund the capital improvements projects
listed under the general fund category, a total of $20,514,000.00 would be
required. To fund the projects listed under enterprise funds, a total of
. $54,743,000.00 would be required. Of the 101 projects submitted, 12 projects
would require $1,000,000.00 or more. The majority of these are in the
enterprise fund categories (water, sewer, etc.). Enterprise fund projects
MRT\KDH.CIP v i

• requiring $1,000,000.00 or more to fund total $49,110,000.00. General fund
projects requiring $1,000,000.00 or more to fund total $12,500,000.00.
To fund the general fund projects (present value of which is $20,518,000.00
and assuming a 2.5% inflation rate) a level funding requirement of
$1,650,000.00 per year would be required through the year 2011. The total for
funding these projects in 2011 would be $24,853,000.00. This would require a
tax rate at the year 2011 to be equivalent to an additional $.18.
To fund enterprise fund projects, $54,743,000.00 would be required. At year
2011, this requirement would inflate to $66,322,000.00, which would equate to
$14,100.00 per current water customer.
For general fund projects, each $1,000,000.00 capital improvement plan general
fund project approved and executed would require additional resources over the
15 years equivalent to an additional $.01 of ad valorem taxes. For each
$1,000,000.00 of CIP enterprise fund projects approved and executed,
additional resources over the 15 years equivalent to $200.00 per existing
customer will be required.
Chapter XI - Revene Generating Alternatives -
The Town currently budgets for certain capital improvements annually, most of
which are funded through ad'valorem taxes and anticipated grants and gifts.
Other alternatives available to the Town include: gifts, endowments, and
• donations, Dare County Toursit Bureau, intergovernmental agreements, Federal
and state grants and loan, public/private partnerships, and special assessment
revenue sharing.
Chapter XII - Conclusion -
,The section will be completed prior to submission of final capital improvement
plan to the Town of Kill Devil Hills Planning Board and Board and
Commissioners for their review.
WRT%KDH.CIP v i i

INTRODUCTION Lon
S
The Town o Kill Devil Hills Capital Improvement Plan (C.I.P.) is a
financial document that outlines proposed expenditures for short and
long range capital acquisition and development. It is intended to serve
the Town as a resource document and seeks to link land use planning and
fiscal planning. This link is accomplished by analyzing the existing
development in the Town, rojecting needs for development that will
occur in the Town arting strategies to meet the needs of future
develo i e maintaining a level of service that is equal to or
reater than that level of service currently enjoyed by Town residents.
The C.I.P. provides estimates of costs, scheduling of projects,
prioritization of projects, and strategi�e`s for project funding
As is the case with any planning document, this C.I.P. is meant to be
dynamic. Moreover, it is meant to be a tool. As such, review and update
of the Capital Improvements Plan is necessary on an annual basis and
should correspond with the development of the Town's annual budget.
This document contains capital expenditures recommendations from each
department for items which cost $15,000 or more (1996 dollars) and have
a useful life of five years or more. Needs or projects identified by
departments that are already budgeted for are included in the
departmental listings. Summaries of budgeted needs or projects are
noted in the introductions to the departmental requests. Similarly,
• office equipment such as copy machines and fax machines and operating
and routine maintenance items, as requested by the various department
heads, are not specifically listed but are noted in the introductions to
the departmental requests that are included as a part of this C.I.P.
The estimated life expectancy of the majority of the Town's rolling
stock is less than five years, given normal wear and tear, and exposure
to the salt air environment. For purposes of this document, passenger
vehicles were not included in the lists generated from each department,
but were included in a separate section outlining anticipated vehicle
needs over the next fifteen years. However, certain "big ticket"
rolling stock items are reflected in the various department lists.
MRT%KDH.CIP vi i i

.c.
• - I. PLANNING METHODOLOGY
The Town of Kill Devil Hills Capital Improvement Plan (C.I.P.) is
formatted and intended to be a dynamic document which will effectively
and efficiently serve Town decision makers for the benefit of the
citizens of Kill Devil Hills. The development of this C.I.P., like that
of most planning documents, involved basic research and analysis
procedures and techniques. These include:
• gather and analyze data;
• inventory and analyze existing conditions (capital stock, revenues
and sources);
• analyze growth trends -- historical and projected;
• analyze (fiscal) impacts of growth;
• establish (capi.tal project) evaluation criteria;
• analyze areas of targeted improvements;
• analyze needs (departmental projects -- descriptions and
evaluations);
. • make recommendations;
• analyze (fiscal) impact of recommended projects; and
• draw conclusions.
Throughout the process, input from those elected to ensure the Town's
well being and future prosperity and the several professionals employed
to head the various Town departments was sought. The project was
spearheaded by an ad hoc Capital Improvement Plan Committee comprised of
private citizens, Town staff, and a professional planning consultant.
Input from department heads we obtained through multiple interviews and
written submissions. The Committee reviewed departmental capital
requests independently using a point system to evaluate the projects
ranging from those needed to maintain a current level of service to
those requests that would fall in a category of wish list. Other
evaluation criteria concerned cost effectiveness, meeting land use
goals, long term impacts, etc., By using this method each project had
to stand on its own against all other projects being considered. This'
evaluation resulted in a ranking by priority using the total points each
project received. Initial public input was solicited in a public
hearing conducted by the Planning Board on, August 20, 1996. On
November 7, 1996, the Town Board of Commissioners' Planning Board,
C.I.P. Advisory Committee, and Town and State staff participated in a
workshop called VISION 2010 with the main emphasis being the discussion
of the Capital Improvements Plan and its link to land use planning. A
listing of meetings wherein the Capital Improvements Plan or its
• development was discussed is included in the APPENDIX 1.
WRT\KDH.CIP 1 - 1

DRk
• II. INVENTORY AND CONDITION OF EXISTING CAPITAL STOCK
E
The Town of Kill Devil Hills Finance and Tax Department prepares an
annual report inventorying fixed assets in the Town. Copies of the Town
of Kill Devil Hills, North Carolina Fixed Asset Inventory Ending June
30, 1996 are available for public inspection in the Finance and Tax
Department. The report, updated in August -September of each year,
documents each asset owned by the Town of Kill Devil Hills, as assigned
to each department, the date acquired, identification numbers if
applicable, a description of the asset, the location of the asset, and
the type and function of the asset. The acquisition cost of each asset
is also provided. EXHIBIT 1 and EXHIBIT 2, taken from the report,
summarize Fixed Asset Inventory Totals Year -to -Date By Line Item Ending
June 30, 1996 and Fixed Asset Inventory Totals Year -to -Date by
Transaction Type Ending June 30, 1996 respectively.
MRT\KM.CIP II - 1

V IV,
TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
Fixed Asset Inventory Totals Year -to -Date By Line Item
Ending June 30, 1996
SOURCE: Town of Kill Devil Hills, North Carolina
Fixed Asset Inventory Ending June 30, 1996
II - 2

0
EXEIBIT 2
TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
Fixed Asset Inventory Totals Year -to -Date By Transaction Type
Ending June 30, 1996
:l�Cf•''�' }}�y�,�r.�5�}° . �fi���y1}tt ' •} ��'
s� "r'
. Vf,.
.�i'� . �
� �
�•�:F',(�,�,.�*+..�.�.�i�.�s.�'�
(4,186.66
}7 . ' (�.�d.��+a{'}
0.00
}'��;iTt:�i%:1;��' ..
0.00
� ��i .`�,
0.00
•: ?3��#�"'
87,618.89
Administration
GF
77,961.47
15,239.08
ti,495.00
Finance
GF
117,836.21
39,781.17
(31,340.4E
11,156.16
0.00
0.00
0.00
137,433.06
Planning
GF
102,467.06
14.645.56
13,863.10
32,114.45
0.00
0.00
0.00
145,363.97
Public Buildings
GF
1.596,674.39
672,850.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2,269.524.82
Police
GF
528,616.40
102,504.24
(4850.00
(31,562.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
597,707.60
Animal Control
GF
46,270.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
46,270.13
Fire
GF
1,254,464.60
75,209.36
(10,810.99:
(12,234.31
0.00
0.00
0.00
1,306,628.66
Public Works -Administration
GF
174,776.11
46.888.04
43,766.79:
5,257.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
223,164.86
Public Works -Streets
GF
4,705,430.96
377,563.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00-.
0.00
5,082,984.36
Powell Bill
GF
718,635.56
423,415.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1,142,050.91
Public Works -Solid Waste
GF
1,185,899.84
239,676.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
(215,780.20
1,209,794.88
Prior Years
GF
1,985,911.36
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
(456,234.781
1,529,676.58
SUBTOTAL
GF
12,494,943.09
2,007,761.87
(53,126.361
545.00
0.00
0.00
(672,014.981
13,778,108.62
Administration
WF
778,744.81
10,895.40
14,076.68:
8,339.34
0.00
0.00
(114,043.20
679,859.67
Plant
WF
1,469,977.24
20.244.71
0.00
2,690.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.49Z91 1.95
System
WF
3,008,497.25
107,061.00
0.00
(23,047.61
0.00
0.00
0.00
3,092,510.74
SUBTOTAL
5,257,219.30
138,201.11
0,076. 8
(12,018.17
0.00
0.00
(114,043.20
6,265,282.36
Wastewater
WW
162,214.61
8,607.00
0.00
11.473.1Z
0 .00
-
0.00
0.00
-
182.194.78
00-09"'2000-9.
-ami,
wmam
SOURCE: Town of Kill Devil Hills, North Carolina
Fixed Asset Inventory Ending June 30, 1996
II - 3

0 III. GROWTH TRENDS
A. Historical.
The population in Kill Devil Hills increased approximately 41%
from fiscal year 1986 through fiscal year 1995. The Town has
experienced moderate population growth throughout the 1990's,
averaging approximately 5.4% population growth per year. See
EXHIBIT 3.
With respect to new construction in the Town, EXHIBIT 4 charts new
commercial and residential construction, as well as commercial and
residential additions, alterations, and conversions from fiscal
year 1987 through fiscal year 1996.
The total number of building permits issued for new residential
construction from fiscal year 1986 through fiscal year 1996 was
1,339. The total value for construction represented by these
permits was $66,336,495.
Although construction of new residential structures thus far in
the 1990's has not paralleled that of the final four years in the
previous decade, a significant trend has occurred with respect to
new residential building starts in Kill Devil Hills. From fiscal
year 1990 through fiscal year 1996, the Town has averaged issuing
• 60 permits for new residential construction. During the same
period, 1,008 permits for additions, alterations, and conversions
of residential structures have been issued for an average of 144
permits per year. The value for additions, alterations, and
conversions to residential properties for the period totaled
$4,504,758. At the end of fiscal year 1991, there were 4,100
single family structures in Kill Devil Hills. At the close of
fiscal year 1995, there were 4,348 single residential structures
in the Town.
Commercial construction in Kill Devil Hills remained relatively
stable throughout the period fiscal year 1987 through fiscal year
1996. Two years however, were exceptional. Fiscal years 1987 and
1990 saw 13 and 3 permits issued respectively for a value of
$8,627,000 and $15,493,000 respectively. For the period fiscal
year 1987 through fiscal year 1996, a total of 59 permits were
issued for commercial construction. The total value of all
permits issued during the period was $43,830,630. During the
period fiscal year 1990 through fiscal year 1996, the total number
of permits issued for additions, alterations, and conversions of
commercial structures was 591. The value represented by the
permits applied for totaled $4,295,377.
WRT\►M.CIP 111 - 1

TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
POPULATION
1984-1994
woo
5500
5000
z 45M
4
r
40M
a
0 35M
3000
25M
2000
1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991
YEAR
1992 19M - 1994
Fiscal
Year Population
1986
2,873
1987
3,182
1988
3,182
1999
3,635
1990
3,621
1991
4,282
1992
4,322
1993
4,400
1994
4,622
1995
4,836
•

4
0
EXHIBIT 4
TOWN OF KE,L DEVIL HII,L5, NORTH CAROLINA
CONSTRUCTION AND BANK DEPOSITS. [1,21
Last Ten Fiscal Years
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ADDITIONS, ALTERATIONS, AND CONVERSIONS
COMMERCIAL [3] RESIDENTIAL (3]
COMMERCIAL
(3]
RESIDENTIAL (3]
Number Number
Number
Number
Fiscalof of
of
of.
Bank
-Year, Permits Value Permits
-7..=
Value Permits
Value.
Permits .
Value
Deposits [4]
1987 13'.: --8,627,000 203 $
9,114,500
$ .293;7561000
1988 15 3,116,000, 333
9,864,684
--
--
--
--
329;217,000
1989 9 7,640,000 384
12,680,556
--
--. -
--
--
389.,177,:000
1990 3 . 15,493,000 83
5,183,350
.136
643,399
163
' 786,040
283,453,000
1991 5. 734,555 36
2,555,855
139
529;196
176
596,173
'290,1462,000
1992 2 4625,000 44
31039,900
115
485,315
159
754,640
300,445;000
1993 2 .29623,'075 65
41463,800.
120
332,667
155
502,243
304,149,000
1994 .4. 1,072,000 .76
6,283,500 [5]
25
1,090,200.
[5] 110
565,852
324,897,324
1995 1 .:1751000 65
8,086,850 [5]
34
'820,100
[5] 137
681,304
341,486,000
1996 .5 ' 1,725;000 50
5,063,500 [5]
22
394,500
[5] 108
-618,506
(6]
[1]
Data differentiating between residential and. commercial tax .valuations is not available from Dare. County,.
the town's listing agent
(2]
For years prior to1990, .-NEW CON$TRUCTION.was-not separated from
ADDITTIONS,. AI:TERA-
TIONs, •AND CONVERSIONS.-.' The- -.trend in the -town is away. from new construction.and toward.
additions,: alteratiin, acid oonversions:. ` ..
[3]
Kill Devil HiAs Plaaning,pepsrtgient
(4]
North Carolina Banldng.Coaunissioa.
(5]
ln'fiscal year.1004 the planning department discontinued including. signs, minor
electrical, mechanical
and plumbing permits, ifl these report humi ers,
[6]
Uoavailabl-e for this year .
`North
SOURCE: Town of Kill Devil Hills, Carolina
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Fiscal
Year Ended June 30,
1996
-
- - .. .. •-
-.III-3.

• B. Projected.
The 1996 population of Kill Devil Hills is estimated to be 4,981.
Projections of a moderate 3% growth rate per year for the next 15
years would result in a year 2011 population of 7,760. See
EXHIBIT 5.
Estimates of the peak seasonal population in the Town are put at
40,000 persons. Projections of peak seasonal population for the
Town in the year 2011 have been set at 60,000 people. This
estimate was derived from an analysis of projected future building
trends and current occupancy rates.
In 1995, there were approximately 4,348 single family structures
in Kill Devil Hills. It is estimated that between 1996 and 2011,
an additional 1,040 new structures will be constructed in Town for
a total of 5,388 structures. Based on historical averages, the
value of new residential construction anticipated from 1996 to the
year 2011 would total approximately $74,033,137.
Projected commercial construction in the Town for the period 1996
through 2011 is expected to total 48 new commercial structures.
This total is based on an average of 3 commercial structures per
year for the period. Based on historical averages, the total
value of this construction would be in the neighborhood of
• $56,806,575.
With respect to additions, alterations, and conversions to
residential property, the Planning Department as of 1994,
discontinued including signs, minor electrical, mechanical and
plumbing permits in their report numbers. However, permits for
these activities in 1994, 1995, and 1996 numbered 110, 137, and
108 respectively. Projections for 1997 indicate that 150 permits
will be issued for these activities. Using these figures, an
average of 127 permits for additions, alterations, and conversions
per year is obtained. Applying this average to the 15 year
planning period, result in an additions 1,905 permits for
additions, alterations, and conversions to residential property.
In fiscal year 1994, the Planning Department discontinued
including signs and minor electrical, mechanical, and plumbing
permits in its report numbers for building permits issued for
additions, alterations, and conversions to commercial properties
as well. Since 1994, permits for additions, alterations, and
conversions to commercial properties totaled 81 with a total value
of $1,935,763. Permit totals for the period, averaged with 1997
totals (50) included for these activities, result in a projected
average for permits issued for additions, alterations, and
conversions to commercial property in the neighborhood of 33
permits per year. Using this figure for the 15 year period would
result in a total of 495 such permits being issued.
MRT\WH.CIP III - 4

•
EXHIBIT 5
TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
POPULATION PROJECTIONS
YEAR 1 1 3%6 5%.
10000
Z
O
i H
g 8000
a
O
a
6000
I•••
�• •
YEAR
3%
5%
7%

Based on platted lots and building trends, North Carolina Electric
Power estimates that the total number of structures in Kill Devil
Hills, at build -out, will total 7,155. Although growth trends
indicate that the Town will not achieve build -out during the 15
year period, emphasis will be placed on redevelopment of existing
areas of Kill Devil Hills, given anticipated market response to
the increased number of seasonal visitors coming to Kill Devil
Hills and the Outer Banks.
war\KM.cic III - 6

• IV. EXISTING REVENUES AND SOURCES
is
The primary source of revenue for Kill Devil Hills are ad valorem taxes,
sales taxes, and occupancy taxes. Retail sales and occupancy taxes
increased approximately 10% from the fiscal year ending June 30, 1995 to
the fiscal year ending June 30, 1996. This increase is indicative of
the continued stability of the local economy. Currently, the Town of
Kill Devil Hills enjoys a favorable economic environment and local
indicators point to continued stability. Dare County's economy, as is
Kill Devil Hills, is based on travel, tourism, and related service
industries. Taken from the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Year
Ending June 30, 1996, the EXHIBIT 6 summarizes general fund revenues and
other financing sources available to the Town for the last 10 fiscal
years. In addition, EXHIBIT 7, taken from the Town of Kill Devil Hills
1996-1997 Adopted Budget describes current tax rates, use and connection
fees, development review fees, building permit fees, and miscellaneous
fees.
WRT\MH.CIP IV - 1

•
0•
EXHIBIT 6
TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
AND OTAER FINANCING SOURCES
Last Ten Fiscal Years
.Total
Restricted
Fiscal
General
Intergovern-
Permits
Sales
and
Fund
Lease
Ot her
Year
Ended
Fund
Revenues
Taxes
Percent
mental
Revenues
Percent
and _
Fees
Percent
Services
Percent
Transfers
Percent
Proceeds
Percent
Revenues
Percent
1987 $
4,233,758
$ 2,577,585
60.88% $. 110,336
2.61% $
191,400
4.52%
479,905
11.34%
$ 100,000
2.36% $
538,552
12.72%
$ 235,980
5.57%
1988.[1]
4,595,546
2,682,509
58.37%
201,362
4.38%
327,168
7.12%
492,839
10.7290
50,000
1.09%
388,319
8.45%
453,349
9.86%
1989
4,919,677
3,040,505
61.80%
168,425
3.42%
486,568
9.89%
630,303
12.81%
141,368
2.87%
166,289
3.38%
286,219
5.82%
1990
5,296,842
3,453,260 '
65.19%
136,991
2.59%
314,788
5.94%
665,602
12.57%
100,000
1.89%
255,409
4.82%
370,802
7.00%
1991
5,512,349
4,449,048
80:71 %
192,250
3.49 %
70,667
1.28 %
26,580
0.48 %
150,000
2.72 %
297,450
5.40 %
326,354
5.92 %
1992
5,370,787
4,576,546
85.2130
159,855
2.98%
115,776.
2.17%
37,333
0.70%
150,000
-2.79%
88,008
1.649ra
243,269
4.53%
1993
5,712,957
4,955,756
86.75%
203,337
3.56%
100,871
1.78%
28,332
•0.50%
150;000
2;63%
—
--
274,661
4.81
1994
6,427,671
5,133,942
.79.87 %
236,251
3.68 %
124,000
1..94 %
29,061
0.45 %
200,000
3.11 �0..
431,065
6.71 %
2731352
4.25 %
i995
6,759,787
5,460424..
80.78%
291;611
4.31% .
106,891.
1.59%
26,360
0.39%
175,000
2.59%
332,795
4.92%
366,706
5.42 5.
1996•
. 7,537,110
- 5,577-1770
74.00 %
367,144
4.87 %.
122,586
.1.65 %
23;311
0.31 %
175,000
2.32 %
505,173
6:70 %.
766,126
10.145'0
111 Tootal. other revenues includes' $231,280 bond proceeds. -
SOURCE:
Town
of Kill Devil Hills,
North Carolina
Comprehensive Annual Financial
Report Fiscal
Year
Ended June
30, 1996
,
IY
2

EXHIBIT 7
TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS
is
•
Cl
Budget Ordinance
BE IT ORDAINED by the Honorable Mayor and Board of Commissioners of the Town of Kill Devil Hills,
North Carolina:
Section L The following amounts are hereby appropriated in the general fund for the operation of the town
government and its activities for the fiscal year beginning July 1,1996, and ending June 30,1997,
in accordance with the chart of accounts heretofore established for this town:
Administration $
436,577
Finance and Taxes
448,240
Finance -Management Information Systems
111,965
Planning and Development
397,533
Public Works - Public Buildings
252,906
Police
1,142,531
Police -Animal Control
77,178
Fire
978,356
Fire - Beach Resque
176,023
Public Works - Administration
354,716
Public Works -.Streets
774,707
Public Works - Powell Bill
202,000
Public Works - Solid Waste
1,158,590
$ 6,511,322
It is estimated that the following revenues will be available to the general fund for the fiscal year
beginning July 1,1996, and ending June 30,1997:
Ad valorem taxes
$ 3,129,100
Tax penalties and interest
18,000
Other taxes and licenses
2,166,947
Unrestricted intergovernmental revenues
331,550
Restricted intergovernmental revenues
202,000
Permits and fees
99,440
Sales and services
24,450
Investment earnings
160,000
Other revenues
12,200
Board of Education
23,450
Contribution from water fund
210,000
Undesignated fund balance appropriated
134,185
$ 6,511,322
SOURCE: Town of Kill Devil Hills
1996-1997 Adopted Budget
IV -.3

.�iAV i :i
Budget Ordinance
• Section S. The budget officer is hereby authorized to transfer appropriations within a fund as contained
herein under the following conditions:
A. He/she may transfer amounts between object of expenditure (line item) within a department
without limitation and without a report being requested.
B. He/she may not transfer any amounts between departments of the same fund with the
following exceptions:
1. Amounts may be transferred between the following departments:
Public Works/Administration
Public Works/Public Buildings
Public Works/Streets
Public Works/Solid Waste
2. Amounts may be transferred between the following departments:
Water/Administration
Water/Plant
Water/Systems
3. Amounts may be transferred between the following departments:
Police
Police/Animal Control
• 4. Amounts may be transferred between the following departments:
Finance
Finance/Management Information Systems
These departments are accounted for individually for reporting purposes; however, only one
department head presides over public works, one over police, one over finance and one over the
water department. Transfers between a single department head's programs may become necessary
and may be expended through approval by the budget officer. Any such transfers shall be
reported to the governing board at its next meeting and shall be entered into the minutes.
C. He/she may not transfer any amount between funds nor from any contingency appropriation
within any fund.
Section 6. The budget is presented in object of expenditure (line item form) for detail purposes only. The
budget is adopted on a departmental appropriation basis.
Section 7. Fees.
A. Development Review Fees Enclosure additions under existing single family dwellings used
solely for. (a) building access, (b) parking, (c) private garage, or (d) storage use only shall be
exempt from the development review fee schedule provided it is in compliance with the
National Flood Insurance Program and Dare County Health Department. A building permit
shall be required with appropriate building permit fees paid.
SOURCE: Town of Kill Devil Hills
1996-1997 Adopted Budget
IV-4

• ' • ►�1 1 1 Cil
Budget Ordinance
S 1. Single family dwelling, multi -family dwelling, condominiums, town houses, apartment
buildings -$100 per unit.
2. Motel, hotels (without cooking facilities) - $75 per unit.
3. Commercial parking lots; commercial, business, and multi -family accessory parking areas
excluding single family residences. This fee is in addition to required review fees. - $10
per space.
4. All other new development not included elsewhere in the fee schedule. (Ibis fee is based
on footprint of proposed development or structure and is in addition to review fees for
accessory parking areas) - 25 cents per square foot.
5. Processing, storage areas and entertainment areas - 25 cents per square foot.
6. Vehicle and equipment storage areas and related accessory use areas - 25 cents per
square foot.
7. Vehicle and equipment storage areas and related accessory use areas - 25 cents per
square foot.
8. Marinas and boat ramps - 25 cents per square foot.
9. Conditional use permit for home occupation - $50 per each.
10. Lots in proposed subdivision - $60 per lot.
• 11. A charge of 25 percent of the initial development review fee shall be paid fora re -
submittal when the following conditions are met:
a. A review fee has been paid.
b. The site plan approval has expired
c. No charges are being proposed in the resubmitted site plans.
•w
B. Building Permit Fees All building permit fees shall be paid, along with all other required
town fees, prior to the issuance of any permit. All permits shall be consistent with the North
Carolina Uniform Building Code.
1. All new structures and additions, including covered decks, and all structures moved within
or into town, excluding those structures relocated on the same lot, shall be charged 50
cents per square foot with a minimum of $50. This fee includes plumbing, electrical and
mechanical permits in one joint permit.
2. Piers, bulkheads, fences, open decks, new roofs, demolition, land disturbing and any
activity which requires a building permit not addressed in this schedule shall be charged*
a flat fee of $50 each.
3. Certificate of Occupancy - $30 each
4. Signs - a flat fee of $50.
5. Banners - a flat fee of $25.00.
• SOURCE: Town of Kill Devil Hills
1996-1997 Adopted Budget
IV-5

TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS
Budget Ordinance
• 6.
Renovation/remodeling of existing structures without a change in the site plan or
footprint, including electrical, plumbing and/or mechanical upgrades - 25 cents per square
foot. (Relocation of same structure on same site - 25 cents per square foot with a
minimum of $50.)
7.
Electrical permits, plumbing permits, mechanical permits - $50.
8.
Enclosed building area of single family dwellings used solely for storage or garage shall
be charged 25 cents per square foot, minimum of $50.-
9.
Accessory use structure - 25 cents per square foot, with a minimum charge of $50.
10.
Temporary poles, phone booths and CATV amplifiers - $30 per installation.
11.
A $100 penalty fee shall be charged for starting work without a permit.
12.
A reinspection fee of $50 shall be charged for all required reinspections.
C. Miscellaneous Fees. Miscellaneous fees shall include but not be limited to the following:
Zoning maps (small) $ 4.00
Zoning maps (large) 7.50
License plates 1•00
Zoning Ordinance (Chapter 21) 15.00
North Carolina Building Code book 2.50
Land Use Plan 15.00
.
Town Code book 125.00
10.00
Town Budget
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report 25.00
Police or accident reports 2•00
Sunshine list 10.00
New and replacement residential refuse containers 100.00
Application to Board of Adjustment 150.00
Application for Zoning Amendment 250.00
Animal shelter boarding fee - per day 10.00
Animal adoption fee 10.00
Dog tag fee (issuance) 5.00
Dog tag fee (lost tags) 2.50
Animal Control civil citation 25.00
Home occupation application review 50.00
Itinerant merchant application review 50.00
Taxi cab companies application review fee 50.00
Taxi cab driver permit 15.00
Taxi cab driver renewal fee 5.00
Residential refuse container 100•0
I Return check fee 15.00
Commercial dumpster fee subject to cost
• 1 Rearm cheek for prop" rarer subject 7o Nm& Carolina G=crd Sta4am
SOURCE: Town of Kill Devil Hills
1996-1997 Adopted Budget
IV-6

TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS
Budget Ordinance
• Section 8. in the water fund, water utilities fees remain as adopted by the Board of Commissioners in June
1994.
Water Rates
Minimum Charge for the First
5,000 Gallons
Meter Size Rate
3/4 inch $ 30.00
1 inch 54.00
1 'A inch 124.00
2 inch 231.00
3 inch 445.00
4 inch and up 842.00
Commodity Rate (Per 1,000 Gallons)
Kill Devil
Hills
Gallonage
Customers
• 6,000 - 40,000 $
3.35 $
41,000 - 250,000
3.60
251,000 - 1,000,000
3.85
1,001,000 and over
4.20
Surety Deposits
Meter Size
Rate
3/4 inch $
100.00
1 inch
150.00
11/2 inch
300.00
2 inch
500.00
3 inch
1,000.00
4 inch and up
2,000.00
Kitty Hawk
Customers 1
3.70
3.95
4.25
4.45
1 The basic rate for Krtty Hawk customers is $38 for the first 5,000 gallons and the connnodity rate shown haw
SOURCE: Town of Kill Devil Hills
1996-1997 Adopted Budget
IV-7

TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS
Budget Ordinance
• Tap Fees (Installation Charges)
Meter Size Fee
3/4 inch $ 500.00
1 inch 750.00
11/2 inch 2,500.00
2 inch 4,000.00 I
3 inch and up 7,500.00
. Initial Hook -Up Fees
$3,000 per 3/4 inch or 3/4 inch equivalent meter unit. An "equivalent meter unit" shall equal one 3/4 inch initial
connection fee charge as follows:
Single Family Residence - one 3/4 inch initial hook-up fee per unit.
Multifamily -
1. Condos, town houses, cottage courts, apartments, duplexes, mobile homes, and other types of
multifamily units - one initial hook-up fee per habitable unit.
2. Hotel, motels, and campgrounds - one initial hook-up fee per each habitable unit or one initial
hook-up fee per every three units.
3. Commercial:
a. Laundries - one initial hook-up fee for every five machines.
b. Restaurants - one initial hook-up fee for every twenty seats.
c. Car washes - one initial hook-up fee for every two stalls.
4. Other -Should a potential water use of commercial nature not be included in the list above then
the initial hook-up fee shall be based upon the rate of av additional $1,500 for each 1/2 inch or
any part thereof, increased size over 3/4 inch.
Miscellaneous Fees
Disconnection Fee (No quarterly minimum per unit fee) Two quarter maximum ......... $ 150
'nirn Off Fee (Winterizing)................................................... 15
Administrative Fee (Non-payment) ............................................. 50
Reconnect Fee (Non-payment of application) ..................................... 50
Re -read Fee/Calibration (If nothing is wrong with the meter) .......................... 10
Penalty - ten percent (late payment of bills)
Repairs to a water meter, lock, and box will be the actual cost of repair. or replacement.
• 1 Amounts shown for aU taps ova 1 1(2 &w1w am deposits and dose taps will include an adminiwutiw fee of ten patiau of
actual casts.
SOURCE: Town of Kill Devil Hills
1996-1997 Adopted Budget IV - 8

TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS
Budget Ordinance
• Wastewater Rates
Minimum(0 - 9,000 Gallons) ................................................. $ 72
Commodity Rate (Per 1,000 Gallons) ............................................ 8
Surety Deposits (Double the quarter minimum) .................................. 144
Penalty - ten percent (late payment of bills)
Section 10. Group Health Insurance Plan - Internal Service Fund - Financial Plan.
Anticipated Revenue
General fund charges $ 375,490
Water fund charges 66,754
Wastewater fund charges 8,344
Interest earnings 2,000
Health insurance reserves 59,716
Total Anticipated Revenues $ 512,304
Anticipated Expenditures
• Total Authorized Expenditures $ 512,304
• SOURCE: Town of Kill Devil Hills
1996-1997 Adopted Budget
IV-9

TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS
Budget Ordinance
Section 11. Copies of the Budget Ordinance shall be furnished to the Budget Officer, the Finance Officer, and
the Tax Collector for direction in the carrying out of their duties.
W_ �i L9r't4,
1 W. 11 • ' 1
Mayor of
Adopted this o? 6 day of Jkk.0 1996
Upon motion by QryAM,* 5 5,'0XC1 W►I �' am �F Yj/VrK
seconded by 06Mm'5KOntf 1H -1-). Shjsl
passed by a vote of 4 in favo and
held on June -7G . 1996.
ar
tip\
.• v
ler
APPROVED O FORM:
Wallace H. McCown, Town Attorney
the foregoing was
opposed at the Board of Commissioners meeting
I, fonI4 E. WNCH .7ogm ekik of the Town of Kill Devil Hills, do hereby
certify that the fore ingentitledKILLDEVILHILLSBOARDOFCOMMISSIONERS
BUDGET ORDINANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996-1997 w2AINFN
own Code
on a -21 1996 at 3'00 o'clock. m.
Adopted the ate_ day of June 1996.
•
SOURCE: Town of Kill Devil Hills
1996-1997 Adopted Budget
IV - 10

U
n
�J
U
BRA
V. FISCAL IMPACT OF GROWTH
EXHIBIT 8 charts General Fund Revenue Projections, EXHIBIT 9 charts
General Fund Expenditure Projections, and EXHIBIT 10 charts General Fund
Surplus Projections for the Town for the next fifteen years.
war\KDH.CIP r 1

�J
• 0
C
N
EXHIBIT S
GENERAL FUND REVENUE PROJECTIONS
(T 000's)
SOURCE: Town of Kill Devil Hills, North Carolina
,Capital Improvement Plan Committee

r:
C
EXHIBIT 10
GENERAL FUND SURPLUS PROJECTIONS
�_
•V�
•ram
•V
•1•/•
�"
�„�
�,
(T 000's)
SOURCE: Town of Kill Devil Hills, North Carolina
'Capital Improvement Plan Committee

0
•
VI.
� A-
DRAil
CAPITAL PROJECT EVALUATION CRITERIA
A. Introduction
Any priority setting methodology needs to be based on how closely
the proposed project meets specific established criteria. The
criteria can be based on a wide range of conditions and needs.
Evaluation of projects is not a simple or easy matter. Careful
consideration of numerous factors must be addressed in evaluating
each project. This priority evaluation involved assigning
"points" when the project met certain criteria. The projects with
the highest number of points are then recommended by the Capital
Improvement Plan Committee (Committee) to the Planning Board which
in turn makes recommendations to the Board of Commissioners for
funding.
In developing the funding recommendations, the Capital Improvement
Committee developed the following criteria to assign numerical
points to each project.
B. Service Level Considerations
This category reflected how the proposed project affected the
Town's level of service. Level of service refers to typical
services that all the various Town departments perform such as
trash collection, street repair, and fire and police protection.
If the proposed project corrected and unsatisfactory level of tt,
service it received the highest points. A project which was
determined to the a "wish list" project, that is, a project that
the resultant benefit was narrow in scope and one that would
provide limited benefits to the Town, received the lowest points.
` One base assumption here with the level of service is that the
Town's current level of service is satisfactory (except for those
WRT\KDH.CIP
projects which the Committee felt corrected an unsatisfactory
level of service).
Points for this major areas of consideration were assigned as
follows:
Maximum number of points
1. Correct and unsatisfactory level of service
2. Maintain a current level of service 40
3. Increase a level of service 30
4. Represent a "wish list" 20
5. Other As determined
Special attention was given to projects that addressed health,
safety, and welfare issues. As service level 'considerations were
discussed, the specific question "Is this project necessary to or
does this project specifically address health, safety, and welfare
issues?" was asked. If the project addressed health, safety, and
welfare issues, it received more points.
VI-1

In addition to Service Level Considerations, the Committee asked
general questions related to a variety of other areas of
•
consideration. The Committee also discussed how each proposed
project fulfilled overall community goals and what fiscal impacts
can be anticipated.
C.
Land Use Plan Policy Considerations
The project was assigned a point for each policy or implementation
strategy -- as contained in the 1993 Land Use Plan -- that it will
meet or help to further implement.
D.
Departmental Goal Considerations
The project was assigned positive points if this project was an
established goal of the department submitting the request. Points
for this area of consideration ranged from 0 to +5.
E.
Timing Considerations
,?
Is the project deferable? Can the Town wait to do the project?
If the project'is deferable, then negative points were assigned.
If the project is not deferable, then positive points were
assigned. Points for this are of consideration ranged from -5 to
+10.
F.
Project Interdependence Considerations
If the success of the project was dependent upon another project,
•
another department, or another governmental unit, it received
negative points. If the proposed project was not dependent upon
another project, another department, or another governmental unit,
then positive points were assigned. Points for this area of
consideration ranged from -5 to +5.
G.
Long Term Fiscal Impact Considerations
The project was awarded positive points if there would be long-
term fiscal impacts if the proposed project was not funded.
Points for this area of consideration ranged from 0 to +5.
H.
Cost Effectiveness Considerations
The project was awarded positive points if the project is
considered cost effective. If there was another more economical
way of providing the service, the project received negative
points. Points for this area of consideration ranged from -5 to
+5.
0
WRT\WH.CIP VI - 2

I. State or Federal Mandates or Initiatives Considerations
• The project was awarded positive points if it served to meet the
requirements of a State or Federal mandate or enables the Town to
take advantage of State or Federal initiatives that are in keeping
with the desires of the Town. Points for this area of
consideration ranged from 0 to +5.
J. Special Considerations
In this category, the Committee could assign positive points to a
project if the previous criteria did not accurately address all
the merits of the project. Points for this area of consideration
ranged from 0 to +10.
n
U
0 WRT\KM.CIP VI - 3

VII. TARGETED AREAS OF IMPROVEMENTS
• A. Introduction
For the past several fiscal years, the Town has budgeted for
capital programs. In addition to the Street Improvement Master
Plan and related stormwater management improvements (Public Works
- Streets and Public Works - Powell Bill), the Town has budgeted
for capital programs for shoreline accesses (Public Works - Public
Buildings), recreational facilities (Public Works - Public
Buildings), land and buildings (Public Works - Public Buildings).
Similarly, Town departments normally request office equipment in
their annual budget requests. For informational purposes, these
requests were noted under the department heading from which they
originated.
B. Land Use Plan Update
As the main.guidance document for land use policy, the Land Use
Plan Update (1993) contains a recommendation that a capital
improvements plan be developed. The land use plan suggests long
term capital investments and studies that would result in capital
investments. The plan, scheduled to be updated in 1997, will draw
heavily from the information gathered for the capital improvements
plan. In addition, the Board of Commissioners Planning Board
staff and consultants conducted a work shop in November 1996
called Vision 2010 that served to effectively link the capital
improvements planning process to the forth coming land use plan
• update.
The plans that are described in the following paragraphs are
referenced in the land use plan process and also are reflected in
many of the projects in the capital improvements plan.
C. Street Improvement Master Plan
-4' In July, 1994 the Kill Devil Hills Board of Commissioners
!.N initiated an investigation to determine the overall condition of
4,n Town streets and measures needed to improve streets to meet
'- current Town standards. The investigation included the
determination of a Town Thoroughfare Plan, determination of
existing roadway and drainage conditions, a proposed numerical
order of improvement, the present value cost of proposed
improvements, and a roadway reconstruction plan in the event of a
catastrophic loss of roadway infrastructure.
The Town of Kill Devil Hills' Street Improvement Master Plan dated
June, 1995 lists in priority order nearly 200 roadway projects in
need of improvement. Based on information provided in the Street
Improvement Master Plan and consultation with the Director of
Public Works, the estimated cost of street improvements were
calculated by multiplying the length of the street or segment
proposed for improvement by a factor of $70 per foot. These
projects have been listed and are included in APPENDIX 2. These
WRT%=H.cty VII - 1

projects have not, however, been ranked according to the
evaluation criteria applied to other capital projects in this CIP
• `
since the rank ordering of these roadway projects has already been
accomplished through the review and plan development process.
The Town of Kill Devil Hills has historically adopted a pay-as-
,1
you-go approach to providing street improvements. In 1995, a
contract for street and drainage improvements totalling $503,000
T
was awarded. It is likely that the Town will continue the pay-as-
you-go approach for street improvements. In the current budget,
$719,000 has been budgeted for street improvements and related
drainage requirements. The Town has also earmarked $725,000,
$728,000, and $731,000 for such improvements in fiscal years 1997-
1998, 1998-1999, and 1999-2000 respectively. Projects have been
forecasted according to the funds earmarked for these years.
D.
Stormwater Management Plan
In conjunction with road and street improvements, much stormwater
management work has been done in the Town. The balance will be
completed as r6ad and street projects are undertaken. The Town
adopted a town -wide Stormwater Management Plan in 1988.
E.
Shoreline Access Plan
The Town of Kill Devil Hills updated a Shoreline Access Plan
updated in 1992. Funding for shoreline access projects comes from
state grants (75%) or Dare County Tourist Bureau grants (50%) and
•
Town general funds. A listing of projects taken from this update
are included in APPENDIX 3. These projects have not, however,
been ranked according to the evaluation criteria applied to other
capital projects in this CIP since the rank ordering of these
projects has already been accomplished through the review and plan
development process.
F.
Recreational Facilities Plan
As noted, the Town has a history of budgeting for recreational
facilities in its Capital Improvement Plan for recreational
facilities as included in its most recent budget. Currently, the
w Town's Recreational Facilities Plan is being updated. Recommended
projects and cost estimates resulting from the Recreational
Facilities Plan Update will be included in a future version of the
Capital Improvement Plan. Projects discussed thus far include
improvements to Hayman Boulevard Park and Meekins Field and new
facilities along Veteran's Drive (Aviation Park) and at the Fresh
Pond.
0 war\►M.CIP VII - 2

. G. Vehicle Replacement Plan
In 1996, the Town's Finance and Tax Department assimilated data
concerning the vehicles and equipment owned by the Town to be used
for anticipated replacement of same. See EXHIBIT 11. With a few
exceptions, most of the vehicles and equipment on this list are
passenger vehicles or pickup trucks. The list has been edited to
remove those large ticket rolling stock items which have been
included in the various departmental Capital Need/Project
Listings. Also, the anticipated replacement schedule (each five
years) for the vehicles remaining on the list has been projected
into the 15 year planning period.
•
0 WRT\VM.CIP VII - 3

EXHIBIT 11
TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS FLEET - Vehicles and Equipment
& 1➢{h!
ifd t
#csyVehldfst lOtitk y
�Al 1;;nt .+
�Y,v% v VeHIdT M ,
= Z
YY r{O `
b en
HOiss bt��
<!r�lgA1
�A�rrttic( Ae [aCrmenCDat ,Y J.°rots
�6%. *, OT/1�96i?r199>Y/>luY 9 /200 MOM .
/newer used
Adminl"on
020 11985
1•Chevrolet
Sedan
1 Gt BL5162JAI65455 I
In service
75,372
Public Works
204
1985
John Deere Garden Tractor
M0031 aX320604
In service
208
1988 I
—1-9917
Lowboy Trailer
i HOTB121 SJ1057052
In service
1
20a
Ford Pick Up
1FTCRiSTXMPA56745
in service
66,074
X
209
1991
Ford Pick U B &
1 FTCR15T1 MPA58747
in service
34.137
X
022
198a
Chevrolet Sedan
IGiBL5161JAI65544
In service
108,608
X
210
1995
Ford Pick U S &
1 FTEFi 4NOSNA78572
In service
8,026
X
211
1996
Ford Pick Up (B S G) I
1 FTEF14N2TL81 a571
In service
984
X
Street
303
1978
Mack Dump
DMaa5S37025
In service
125.902
X
304
1984
Galion Motor Grader
C10642
In service
2,333.5
2004/2005
300
1970
Ford Tractor
0490923
In service
2,500.0
X
307
1983
Ford Boom Mower
DONN60151.
In service
872.8
X
308
1983
Somag Roller
2EO174
In service
n/a
X
309
1984
Loe—Boy Asphalt Maintainer
1200144X
in service
n/a
X
310
1982
Somag Asphalt Re eler
2BOO40
in service
n/a
X
311
1982
Wacker Plate Compactor
415302464
in service
313
1953
Target Concrete Saw
PAC11145DMO262E
In service
'
314
1988 1
John Deere Tractor
CH0850SO2080
in service
828.8
2002/2003
315
/969 '
Water Trailer
340574 '
in service
318
1986
Wacker Plate Compactor
415105877
in service
319
1987
John Deers Loader
OW444OL512823
in service
3.743.6
X
321
1988
John Deere Loader Backhoe
T0310CF7574ea
In service
2.498.4
2002/2003
322
1991
Ford Pick U
1FTCR15T8MPA58745
In service
49,984
x
323
1992 1
Ford Pick U
1FTHF36HSNNBI0031
In service '
33.151
X
324
1967
Kaiser Jeep
41.7741
In service
n/a
2005/2006
325
logo
Ford New Holland Tractor
018611B
1
17.0
2011/2012
Solid Waste
407
1956 i
Ford Commercial
1 FDYWaOUOGVA47099 i
in service
92,529
X
410
1972 1
Load Trailer
M8710381 I
in service
n/a
X
411
1972 1
Soul Trailer
318 1
in service
n/a
X
414
t gall '
White GMC Residential
4V2HCFADXJN804268
in service
415
1988
Vermeer Brush Chipper
0510
In service
n/a
X
416
1991
Ford Pick Up
IFTCR15TOMPA56744
In service
39.694
X
417
1991
White GMC Residential
4V2HCFHCaMUS10135
in service
48,562
X
'
418
1991
Geneva Recycling Trailer
48EUS1415MVWJH032
In service
n/a
X
419
1992
Ford Pick Up
1FTEX14H4NK880866
in service
38,981
X
420
1991
Geneva Recycling Trailer
4BEU81415MVWJH029
In service
n/a
X
421
1 1994
Ford Flatbed Boom
iFDXK74C9RVA20832
In service
19.592
x
Solid Waste
422
1994 White GMC Residential
4V2DCFMD1RN8a674a
In service
21,031
2001/2002
423 1
1995 r White GMC Ron Off
4V2JCSBE4SR838504
in service
20.687
4005/2008
424
1995 White GMC Residential
4V2DCFM05SN696057 I
in service
14.696
2004/2005
425
1905 Ford Commercial
iFDYW82E3SVA47680 I
in service
12,295
2004/2005
425
1996 Ford Commercial
1 FDYW82EXTVA18744 I
in service
3.347
2004/2005
Water
512
1987 1 Toyota Pick Up
JURN07P8H5059220
In service
105,821
Administrstion
516
199 Ford Pic U
1 FTCRI STSMPA56749
In service
53,5001
517
1991 Ford Pick U
1 FTCAI STt MPA56750
in service
33,841
Water Plant
516 1
1992 1 Ford Pick Up
1 FTCRI STI NPA48172 I
In service 1
76.6271
I
I
Water Systems
SOo I
1 ga3 MTA 0' Wellpoint Pump
CSI 1182
in service
Gil
_287 1 To ota Pick Up
JURN67PXM5059392
in service
145.452
513
1959 1 GMC 1 Ton Pick Up
1 GDJR34KXKF703771
In service
85,031
X
514
1990 John Deere ads 8ackhoo
310CG7 _9_TR9
n service
519
1991 1 Le" Dresser All Com pressor
320SXa3 .
in service
520
1996 Ford Pick U
1FTEF14N47LB18569
In service
1.141
521
1990 Ford Pick Up I
1 FTEFi4NOTL818S70
In service
goo
Wastewater
510 1
1991 ! Ford Pick U 1
1FTCR1ST3MPA58748 (
in service
68,3771
1
I
Police
623
1908 ' Chevrolet Sedan
1G1BL5163JA165500 I
In service
63,9041
X
624
1988 Chevrolet Sedan
1GiBLS16aJA165475
1 in service
64,500
X.
625
1990 1 Chevrolet Suburban
1GNGV26K1LF15281a
in service
12.813
626
1990 1 Chevrolet Sedan
IGIBU471LAi33961
in service
48,4521
X
627
1990 Chevrolet Sedan
101 BL5471 LAI 37041
in service
70,500
X
628
1990 Chevrolet Sedan
1 Gt BL5477LA137027
in service
88,854
X
630
1991 1 Ford Sedan
2FACP72G2MX1 a0915
in service
54,270
X
631
1991 1 Ford Sedan
2FACP72G4MX100916
In service
71,1251
X
633
1991 1 Ford Sedan
2FACP72G8MX1 aO918
in service
75,632
X
636
1992 Ford Sedan
1 FACPSO4ONA191392
In service
62.077
X
637
1992 i Ford Sedan
2FACP72W9NX2167e5
I In service
80.4101
X
638
1992 1 Ford Sedan
2FACP72W7NX216784
I In service
587334
X
639
1992 ' Ford Sedan
2FACP72WSNX2167a3
i in service
70.535
X
640
1992
Ford Sedan
2FACP72WON (216785
in service
642 •
1986
I Honda Fourtrax
JH313TE06000Ci $1924
in service
n/a
I
X
843
1993
Chevrolet Sedan
iGIBL5371PWI25935
in service
51.850
X
644
1993
Chevrolet Sedan
1 G1 BL5377PW12593a
In service
42,709
X
647
1994
Chevrolet Sedan
10181-52136RR167407
In service
29.415
X
648
19a3
Chevrolet 1-1/4 Ton IckAJp
1 GCGD34JI EF307950
in service
36,819
649
1963
Chevrolet 1-1/4 Ton Pick Up'IGCGO34J4EF306405
In service
41.074
Ponce
650
im
Chevrolet Blazer
1G8CT1SE3FO216101
Inservlce
42,511
$51
1995
JespWagon
1J4FJ28SXSL584203
in service
9.7001
X
852
1995
1 Chevrolet Sedan
1GIBL52WXSR180335
in service
9,0411
X
6S3
1998
1 Ford Sedan
2FALP71 W5TX128659
in service
2,614
2001/2002
654
1 1998
Ford Sedan
2FALP71WITX126880
In service
5,141
2001/2002
655
1 1996
Ford Sedan
2FALP71 W3TX126861
I In service
2.732
2001/2002
Animal Control
635
1 1991
Chevrolet Pick Up
1 GCDT19Z5M82S9865
I in service
ae,081
I
X
046
1 1093
1 Ford Pick Up
1FTCRIIUQPTA97280
in:sarvice
78,&�Oj
2001/2002
Planning
703
1995
1 Ford Pick U
1FTEF14N7SNA78670
In service
8,9661
X
632
1991
1 Ford Sedan
2FACP72G5MX180g17
in service
77,827
X
$34
1991
1 Ford Sedan
2FACP72GXMX150919
In service
84.259
X
Fire
1401
1994
KMEPum er
iK9AF4287RN055899
In service
10,851
1,494.0
2013/2014
1402
1970
American LaFrance Pumper
PD12133
in service
24.127
X
1403
1989
Federal Motors Pumper
45JPBAA80KI002735
In service
30,427
200a/2009
1405
1gaS
Grumman Duplex OuInt
1D911.43F1G1008631
In service
9,832
2.088.0
2005/2000
1409
1991
Ford 1 Ton Pick Up
1 FDHF3809MNA39114
in service
9,044
X
1410
1993
Chevrolet Pick Up1GCHK33K3PJ364025
In service
32,956
X
1412
1993
Jeep Wagon
1J4FJ25SOPL575050
In service
22,320
X
1413
1991
Ford Sedan
2FACP72GSMX173330
In service
34.112
1419
1981
I Trailer
NCX591408
in service
Fire — wear 3 tear
Police — replace after 75,000 miles
Water/Wastewater — replace after 100,000 — 2 vehicles over 100,000 — such good performers — want to keep
SOURCE: Town of Kill Devil Hills, North Carolina

VIII. DEPARTMENTAL PROJECTS --DESCRIPTIONS AND EVALUATIONS
0 Introduction
The following sheets describe and evaluate one hundred one (101)
projects submitted by the various Town departments. Each department
head was interviewed and asked to make or verify some primary and
secondary assumptions concerning levels of service, growth rates an
patterns, operations, and needs. Conclusions were then drawn and
projects were rated accordingly. The listing of projects was eval ted
against the evaluation criteria contained in Chapter VI. A syno is of
the criteria follows as EXHIBIT 12.
4X4�
i
•
0 MRT%=H.CIP VIII - 1

EXHIBIT 12
CAPITAL PROJECT EVALUATION CRITERIA
Service Level Considerations
This category reflected how the proposed project affected the Town's
level of service. Level of service refers to typical services that all
the various Town departments perform such as trash collection, street
repair, and fire and police protection. If the proposed project
corrected and unsatisfactory level of service it received the highest
points. A project which was determined to the a "wish list" project,
that is, a project that the resultant benefit was narrow in scope and
one that would provide limited benefits to the Town, received the lowest
points.
One base assumption here with the level of service is that the Town's
current level of service is satisfactory (except for those projects
which the Committee felt corrected an unsatisfactory level of service).
Points for this major areas of consideration were assigned as follows:
Maximum number of points
Correct and unsatisfactory level of service 50
Maintain a current level of service 40
Increase a level of service 30
Represent a "wish list" 20
Other As determined
Special attention was given to projects that addressed health, safety,
and welfare issues. As service level considerations were discussed, the
specific question "Is this project necessary to or does this project
specifically address health, safety, and welfare issues?" was asked. If
the project addressed health, safety, and welfare issues, it received
more points.
In addition to Service Level Considerations, the Committee asked general
questions related to a variety of other areas of consideration. The
Committee also discussed how each proposed project fulfilled overall
community goals and what fiscal impacts can be anticipated.
Land Use Plan Policy Considerations
The project was assigned a point for each policy or implementation
strategy -- as contained in the 1993 Land Use Plan -- that it will meet
or help to further implement.
Departmental Goal Considerations
The project was assigned positive points if this project was an
established goal of the department submitting the request. Points for
this area of consideration ranged from 0 to +5.
VIII - 2
Timing Considerations
Is the project deferable? Can the Town wait to do the project? If the
project is deferable, then negative points were assigned. If the
project is not deferable, then positive points were assigned. Points
for this are of consideration ranged from -5 to +10.
Project Interdependence Considerations
If the success of the project was dependent upon another project,
another department, or another governmental unit, it received negative
points. If the proposed project was not dependent upon another project,
another department, or another governmental unit, then positive points
were assigned. Points for this area of consideration ranged from -5 to
+5.
Long Term Fiscal Impact Considerations
The project was awarded positive points if there would be long-term
fiscal impacts if the -proposed project was not funded. Points for this
area of consideration` ranged from 0 to +5.
Cost Effectiveness Considerations
The project was awarded positive points if the project is considered
cost effective. If there was another more economical way of providing
the service, the project received negative points. Points for this area
of consideration ranged from -5 to +5.
State or Federal Mandates or Initiatives Considerations
The project was awarded positive points if it served to meet the
requirements of a State or Federal mandate or enables the Town to take
advantage of State or Federal initiatives that are in keeping with the
desires of the Town. Points for this area of consideration ranged from
0 to +5.
Special Considerations
In this category, the Committee could assign positive points to a
project if the previous criteria did not accurately address all the
merits of the project. Points for this area of consideration ranged
from 0 to +10.

A. Administration (AD)
• The department envisions the need for several pieces of office
equipment such as a collating copy machine within the next two
years, maintenance of various legal subscriptions, replacement of
the administration mail/delivery/errand vehicle, two desk and
chair replacements, a fax machine replacement, and the purchase of
fax machines to be distributed to governing board members to
enhance communications.
The department also envisions the need for additional staff in the
next 5-8 years and will thus need additional space and equipment
for personnel that may be added.
A departmental profile follows. Work sheets describing and
evaluating the department's project requests are also included.
0 WRT%=H.CIP VIII - 3

TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
• DEPARTMENTAL PROFILE
1. DEPARTMENT: Administration (AD)
2. LOCATION/ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1719
102 Town Hall Drive
Kill Devil Hills, NC 27948
3. TELEPHONE NO.: [phone] FAX: [phone]
4. DEPARTMENT HEAD: Debora P. Diaz, Town Manager
5. DEPARTMENTAL GOAL AND OBJECTIVES:
GOAL: To lead and manage the Town of Kill Devil Hills as it provides
quality, innovative and efficient service delivery; to provide
effective human resources services which anticipate, respond to,
and focus on the needs of our citizens and visitors; to dispense
timely and accurate information in response to each request; to
guide Town employees as we strive to exceed the expectations of
all our customers.
OBJECTIVES:
To provide access to Town operations and services, and promote the
Board of Commissioner's policies and goals for the Town of Kill
Devil Hills through a variety of methods that focus on the Boards'
expressed initiatives.
- To conduct our operations in an open and ethical manner which
insures equal access and fair treatment for all citizens.
- To encourage and support the active participation of our citizens
in achieving and maintaining excellence in our government.
- To provide our employees with first -quality personnel services
that assists them in effectively fulfilling the responsibilities
of their positions with the Town.
- To provide cost-effective service delivery, based on the needs of
our citizens and the requirements of local ordinances, and state
and federal laws.
6. DEPARTMENTAL FUNDING SOURCE(S): General Fund appropriations.
7. DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES --JOB TITLES & NUMBER OF POSITIONS:
JOB TITLE NUMBER
Town Manager 1
Administrative Services Director 1
Town Clerk 1
Administrative Assistant 1
Secretary II 1
Secretary I 1
0 YRT%KM.CIP VIII - 4

•
0
0
DEPARTMENT: AD Administration C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 199&97 Rank:
AD-97-05 80 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 20W-01 FY 2001-11
199&97
$25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Anne: to Administration Building
n HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 10
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 1
• Timing Considerations: -S
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 0
• Long Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 0
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points 7
II ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
WRT%KDH.CIP
VIII - 5

•
•
0
DEPARTMENT: AD Administration
C.I.P. PROJECT NO.:
1996-97 Rank:
AD-97-06
55 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total
Budget
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Years
Estimated
Appropriations
Year 1
Cost
to Date
FY
FY 1997-99
1999-99
FY 1999.00
FY 2000-01
FY 2001-11
1996-97
S50,000
01
0
0
0
0
0
DESCRIPTION: Renovate Administration Building downstairs
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 30
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 1
• Timing Considerations: -5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: -5
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 0
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points 22
I ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
WRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 6

•
•
0
DEPARTMENT: AD Administration
C.I.P. PROJECT NO.:
1996-97 Rank:
AD-97-08
15 of 100
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total
Budget
Year 2
FY 1997-98
Year 3
1998-99
Year 4
FY 1999.00
Year 5
FY 2000-01
Years
FY 2001-11
Estimated
Cast
Appropriations
to Date
Year 1
FY
1996-97
$500,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
DESCRIPTION: Beach Renourishment
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 40
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 5
• Departmental Goal Considerations: Stated Town -wide goal. 5
• Timing Considerations: -5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 5
• Long Term Fiscal hnpad Considerations: 2
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 2
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 1
• Special Considerations: 2
• Summary: Total points - 57
ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT N
MRT\t[)H.CIP

•
•
DEPARTMENT: AD Administration C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
AD-97-09 6 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Yeats
Cast to Date FY FY 1997-99 1999-99 FY 1999.00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Renovate Administration Building to comply with American's with Disabilities Act (ADA)
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 45
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 5
• Timing Considerations: 7
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 5
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 2
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: 0
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 5
• Special Considerations: 2
• Summary: Total points - 72
N ACTIVITY FROM - TO . AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT H
VRT\KDH.CIP
VIII - 8

• B. Finance and Tax (FT)
Although no capital needs or projects were identified for the Finance and
Tax Department, the staff envisions the need for a copy machine within the
next two years. A departmental profile follows.
HRT\WH.CIP VIII - 9

C�
E
TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
DEPARTMENTAL PROFILE
1. DEPARTMENT: Finance and Tax (FT)
2. LOCATION/ADDRESS: 1634 N. Croatan Highway
Kill Devil Hills, NC 27948
3. TELEPHONE NO.: [phone]
4. DEPARTMENT HEAD: Teresa Pickrel, Director
5. DEPARTMENTAL GOAL AND OBJECTIVES:
GOAL: To provide efficient and effective administration of the Town's
various operations through centralized support functions including
collections, accounts payable, purchasing, cash management, payroll,
and financial reporting.
OBJECTIVES:
- Administer the Town's financial accounting system in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles and applicable statutory
requirements and provide accurate and timely financial reports.
- Begin work on an accounting policies and procedures manual.
- Implementation of a new financial software package which will be
integrated with the water department.
- Planning and preparation of a two year budget.
- Move into a new office building.
6. DEPARTMENTAL FUNDING SOURCE(S): General Fund appropriations.
7. DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES --JOB TITLES & NUMBER OF POSITIONS:
JOB TITLE
Director
Tax Collector
Accounting Technician I
Central Cashier/Payroll Clerk
Accountant
WRT%KDH.CIP
VIII - 10
NUMBER
1
1
1
1
2

C. Finance - Management Information Systems (F-MIS)
• Although no capital needs or projects were listed for the Finance -
Management Information Systems Department (F-MIS), significant
operational costs related to computer equipment will continue in
future years. Over $48,000 for computer equipment lease was included
in the 1996-97 adopted budget. Similarly, as much as $50,000 per year
may be required for annual computer equipment replacements and the
purchase of specialized equipment such as an image scanning machine
for Town use. A departmental profile follows.
CJ
Cl
HRT\KM.CIP VIII - 11

C�
0
TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
DEPARTMENTAL PROFILE
1. DEPARTMENT: Finance - Management Information System (F-MIS)
2. LOCATION/ADDRESS: 1634 N. Croatan Highway
Kill Devil Hills, NC 27948
3. TELEPHONE NO.: [phone]
4. DEPARTMENT HEAD: Teresa Pickrel, Director
5. DEPARTMENTAL GOAL AND OBJECTIVES:
GOAL: To plan and promote the efficient use of information technology that
will provide Town -wide efficiency for users and taxpayers.
OBJECTIVES:
- Migrate current software to a windows environment.
Duplex our two existing fileservers.
- Transition from a local area network to a wide area network with ISDN
connection. The computer systems at Croatan Highway and the Baum
Tract will be connected.
- Make remote access to computer system possible and improve connections
for the Internet and other on-line services.
- Integrate utility billing software with financial accounting software.
6. DEPARTMENTAL FUNDING SOURCE(S): General Fund appropriations.
7. DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES --JOB TITLES & NUMBER OF POSITIONS:
JOB TITLE
MIS Technician
war\KDH.civ
VIII - 12
NUMBER
1

D. Planning (PLNG)
• The Planning Department (PLNG), which will jointly occupy a new office
building on the Baum tract with the Finance and Tax Department,
anticipates the need for certain furniture items in the next two
years.
A'departmental profile follows. Work sheets describing and evaluating
the department's project requests are also included.
NRT%WH.CIP VIII - 13

0
0
TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
DEPARTMENTAL PROFILE
1. DEPARTMENT: Planning (PLNG)
2. LOCATION/ADDRESS: 1634 N. Croatan Highway
Kill Devil Hills, NC 27948
3. TELEPHONE NO'.: [phone]
4. DEPARTMENT HEAD: William G. Loy, Director
5. DEPARTMENTAL GOAL AND OBJECTIVES:
GOAL: To provide for the orderly growth and redevelopment of the Town
throughout efficient administration of sound growth management
principles and planning practices.
OBJECTIVES:
- Work toward specialization of duties within the department while
preserving cross training and communication to retain continuity
within the department.
- More effectively utilize computer system to generate reports and track
activity of the department.
- Community appearance including work toward US 158 and beach access
corridor beautification.
- Work on Baum Tract municipal campus including finance/planning office
building and possible recreational opportunities.
- Stay informed on new emerging environmental rules and legislation.
- Recommend revisions to the nuisance ordinance that reflect policies of
the Board.
6. DEPARTMENTAL FUNDING SOURCE(S): General Fund appropriations and project
related State grants.
7. DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES --JOB TITLES & NUMBER OF POSITIONS:
JOB TITLE
Director
Planner
Zoning Administrator
Chief Building Inspector
Building Inspector II
Secretary III
Intern
MRT%KDH.CIP
VIII - 14
NUMBER
1
1
1
1
2
1
1

0
s
DEPARTNOW: PLNG Planning C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PLNG-97-02 29 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
TOW Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Years
cod to Date FY FY 1997-98 1999-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$15,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Cempetw mapping equipment
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 30
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: S
• Timing Considerations: -5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 5
• Lang Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: 3
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 2
• Summary: Total points 41
N ACPIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT u
40 -
MRT%KDH.CIP
VIII - 15

0
DEPARTMENT: PLNG Planning C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 199&97 Rank:
PLNG-97-07 81 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-99 1999-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
199&97
$100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Renovations to office building
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 10
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: -S
• Timing Considerations: 0
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 0
a Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 0
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 6
A ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT H
WRT\:Dtt.Clo
VIII - 16

0
0
E. Police (PD)
The Police Department (PD) anticipates that its force will grow in the next
15 years to over 35 personnel. Presently the department consists of 26
employees.
Subsequent years will see the need for more vehicles and equipment as the
department grows. In addition to the capital needs and projects that
follow, the Department anticipates the need for purchase of security
holsters for larger caliber weapons, a copy machine, additional laser speed
detecting equipment, two jet skis, five sets of diving equipment,
electronic surveillance equipment, additional weapons for officers that may
be added to the force, and an additional Honda four wheeler in the next
five years.
A departmental profile follows. Work sheets describing and evaluating the
department's project requests are also included.
MRT%KM.CIP VIII - 17

TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
DEPARTMENTAL PROFILE
1. DEPARTMENT: Police (PD)
2. LOCATION/ADDRESS: 1634 North Croatan Highway
Kill Devil Hills, NC 27948
3. TELEPHONE NO.: [phone]
4. DEPARTMENT HEAD: Major Michael Harris, Acting Chief
5. DEPARTMENTAL GOAL AND OBJECTIVES:
GOAL: To provide a safe and secure environment for the citizens and
visitors of Kill Devil Hills.
OBJECTIVES:
To operate in partnership with the community to identify needs and
implement programs to deter criminal activity.
To train our officer and enhance their ability to provide a better
service and reduce liability for the department.
Progress to meet the changing needs of our community.
so 6. DEPARTMENTAL FUNDING SOURCE(S): General Fund appropriations.
7. DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES --JOB TITLES & NUMBER OF POSITIONS:
JOB TITLE NUMBER
Police Chief
Deputy Police Chief
Police Lieutenant
Police Sergeant
Master Police Officer
Police Officer II
Police Officer I
Police Records Clerk
Secretary II
WRT%WH CIp VIII - 18
1
1
2
3
2
7
6
2
1

0
•
DEPARTMENT: PD Police Department C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PD-97-01 35 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year I Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$367,500 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: 800 MHz dunking radio system
1 HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 30
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 3
• Timing Considerations: -5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 5
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 0
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Spacial Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 34
ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT I
MRT%KDH.CIP

9
9
DEPARTMENT: PD Police Department C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PD-97-03 43 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-99 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Caaanement facilities
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 30
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 3
• Timing Considerations: -S
• Project Interdependence Considerations: -2
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 2
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 1
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Spacial Consideratims: 0
• Summary. Total points - 30
I ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
MRT\IDH.CIP
VIII - 20

0
DEPARTMENT: PD Polite Department C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PD-97-04 66 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year I Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Yeats
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-99 1999-99 FY 1999.00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996.97
$47,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Digitized photo booking and processing system
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 20
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 3
• Timing Considerations: S
• Project Interdependence Considerations: -2
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cost Effectiveness Casidendons: 0
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 17
II ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOK H
MRT%KDH.CIP
VIII — 21

9
DEPARTMENT: PD Police Department C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PD-97-06 66 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year I Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 3 Years
Cast to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
199ti-97
$80,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Fingerprint comparator equipment
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 20
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 3
• Timing Considerations: -S
• Project Interdependence Considerations: -2
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 0
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 17
I AcnvrrY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT H
VRT\KDH.CIF
1111111 :

9
•
DEPARTMENT: PD Police Department C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PD-97-07 53 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year I Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$75,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Mobile ownriand unit and equipment
i HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 20
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 3
• Timing Considerations: -5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 5
• Long Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: 0
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 24
R ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT h
MRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 23

0
•
0
DEPARTMENT: PD Police Department
C.I.P. PROJECT NO.:
199&97 Rank:
PD-97-09
57 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Tsai
Budget
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year S
Years
Estimated
Appropriations
Year 1
Cost
to Date
FY
FY 1997-98
1998-99
FY 1999-00
FY 2000-01
FY 2001-11
199697
$1,500,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
DESCRIPTION: Police Department bnildin&law enforcement training center facility
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 25
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 3
• Timing Considerations: -5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: -3
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 0
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 21
I ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT b
MRT%KDH.CIP
VIII — 24

•
i
DEPARTMENT: PD Police Department C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PD-97-10 57 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year I Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cast to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$35,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Boat and equipment
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 20
• Laud Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 3
• Timing Considerations: -5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: +5
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: -3
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 21
I ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT I
WRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 25

•
•
0
DEPARTMENT: PD Police Department C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PD-97-16 93 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Years
Cast to Date FY FY 1997-98 1999-99 FY 1999-W FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Helicopter
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 10
• Laud Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 2
• Timing Considerations: -5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: -S
• Long --Terns Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: -2
• State or Foderal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Spacial Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 1
I ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT A
WRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 26

i
•
0
I DEPARTMENT: PD Police Department
C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97
PD-97-17 Rank
27 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Fstimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 FYear 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cost to Date FY 199697 FY 1997-9899 FY1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
$30,000 $30,000 0 0 0 0 0
I DESCRIPTION: Renovations to Finance and Tax Banding at 1634 No. Crostan Highway
EISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 40 -
• Land Use Policy Considerations: I
• Departmental God Considerations: 3
• Tuning Considerations: 2
• Project Interdependence Considerations: -5
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 2
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Spacial Considerations: 2
• Summary: Total points - 45
R ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT 11
WRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 27

. F. Police - Animal Control (PD-AC)
It is anticipated that within the 15 year planning period, two additional
officers will be required for animal control activities. Both will require
equipped vehicles and equipment for carrying out their functions.
0
A departmental profile follows. Work sheets describing and evaluating the
department's project requests are also included.
MRT\MH.CIP VIII - 28

TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
1. DEPARTMENT:
2. LOCATION/ADDRESS:
DEPARTMENTAL PROFILE
Police- Animal Control (PD-AC)
1634 North Croatan Highway
Kill Devil Hills, NC 279048
3. TELEPHONE NO.: [phone]
4. DEPARTMENT HEAD: Major Michael Harris, Acting Chief
5. DEPARTMENTAL GOAL AND OBJECTIVES:
GOAL: To provide a safe and pleasant community environment for the
residents of Kill Devil Hills where families and animals can co-
exist.
OBJECTIVES:
To aggressively patrol the Town in search of stray animals.
To provide shelter to animals that are lost, at large, or injured.
To properly dispose of animals in a humane manner.
6. DEPARTMENTAL FUNDING SOURCE(S): General Fund appropriations.
7. DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES --JOB TITLES & NUMBER OF POSITIONS:
JOB TITLE
Chief Animal Control Officer
Animal Control Officer
MRT\KDH.CIP
VIII - 29
NUMBER
1
9

•
0
0
DEPARTMENT: PD-AC C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
Police -Animal Control PD-AC-97-03 74 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Fstimatad Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-99 1999-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1990-97
$50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Renavations to existing coriftement facility
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 20
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 2
• Timing Considerations: -S
to Project Interdependence Considerations: -3
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cost Effoctiveness Considerations: -3
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary. Total points - 12
I ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT p
WRT\KDM.CIP
VIII — 30

G. Fire (FD)
• The Fire Department (FD) will require replacement of miscellaneous fire
fighting equipment throughout the planning period. Also, the Department
has indicated the need for lockers to store gear.
0
A departmental profile follows. Work sheets describing and evaluating the
department's project requests are also included.
NRT%=H.CIP VIII - 31

TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
• CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
DEPARTMENTAL PROFILE
1. DEPARTMENT: Fire (FD)
2. LOCATION/ADDRESS: 1634 North Croatan Highway
Kill Devil Hills, NC 27948
3. TELEPHONE NO.: [phone]
4. DEPARTMENT HEAD: Doug Penland, Chief
5. DEPARTMENTAL GOAL AND OBJECTIVES:
GOAL: To provide needed fire and rescue services for the residents and victors of
the Town.
OBJECTIVES:
- Complete design work and planning for new fire station.
- Implement new training and qualification standards for personnel.
- Implement confined space rescue and soundfront fire/rescue programs.
- Design and implementation of recruitment and retention program for
volunteer firefighters.
6. DEPARTMENTAL FUNDING SOURCE(S): General Fund appropriations.
7. DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES --JOB TITLES & NUMBER OF POSITIONS:
JOB TITLE NUMBER
Chief 1
Deputy Chief 1
Secretary III 1
Captain 3
Firefighter 12
YRT%KM.CIP VIII - 32

•
0
DEPARTMENT: FD Fire Department C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
FD-97-01 13 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-99 1999-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
199697
$3W,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Pumper tm&
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 45
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 3
• Tuning g Considerations: 5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 5
• Long Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 2
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: 2
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 59
ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE - AMOUNT 1
WRT%KDH.CIP
VIII — 33

•
0
0
DEPARTMENT: FD Fire Department C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
FD-97-03 15 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cast to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
199&97
$110001000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: We station
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 40
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 5
• Timing Considerations: 3
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 5
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 2
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: I
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 57
I ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
HRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 34

•
0
DEPARTMENT: FD Fire Department C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
FD-97-N4 25 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Years
Cast to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999.OD FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$37,410 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Renovate fire station at 1634 N. Croatan Highway
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Consideration: 40
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 4
• Timing Considerations: 0
• Project Interdependence Consideration: 0
• Long -Terns Fiscal Impact Considerations: 2
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 1
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 48
I ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE - AMOUNT I
WRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 35

•
0
DEPARTMENT: FD Fire Department C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
FD-97-05 38 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-99 1999-99 FY 19"-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
199697
$1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Training taellity (regional)
HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 35
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 2
• Timing Considerations: -5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: -3
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 2
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 1
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 33
N AcnvrrY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT I
WRT%KDH.CIP
VIII - 36

Cl
J
•
DEPARTMENT: FD Fire Department C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
FD-97-06 34 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Trial Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year I Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-99 1999-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
199697
$ 24,875 $700 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Renovate public safety/fire department building at 1634 N. Crostan Highway
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 30
• Laud Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 1
• Timing Considerations: 2
• Project Interdependence Considerations: -2
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 2
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: 1
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 35
R Acnv1TY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOK d
WRT%KDH.CIP
VIII — 37

•
•
DEPARTMENT: FD Fire Department C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank-
FD-97-09 31 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999.00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
199tr97
$75%000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Ladder truck
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 35
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 2
• Timing g Considerations: -3
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 0
• Long -Terns Fiscal Impact Considerations: 2
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: I
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Coosideratlous. 0
is Summary. Total points - 38
ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT h
HRT%KDH.CIP
VIII — 38

C7
•
•
DEPARTMENT: FD Fire Department C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 199&97 Rank:
FD-97-10 31 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Yeats
Cast to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
199697
$300,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Pumper truck
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 35
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 2
• Timing Considerations: -3
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 0
• Lang -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 2
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 1
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 38
II ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT H
MRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 39

H. Fire - Beach Rescue (FD-BR)
49 Presently, the Town contracts with a private firm to provide beach rescue.
The Town is currently in the second year of a three contract and has a two
year continuance option available to it.
to
A departmental profile follows. Work sheets describing and evaluating the
department's project requests are also included.
WRT%WH.CIP VIII - 40

TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
• CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
DEPARTMENTAL PROFILE
1. DEPARTMENT: Fire - Beach Rescue (FD-BR)
2. LOCATION/ADDRESS: 1634 North Croatan Highway
Kill Devil Hills, NC 279048
3. TELEPHONE NO.: [phone]
4. DEPARTMENT HEAD: Doug Penland, Chief
5. DEPARTMENTAL GOAL AND OBJECTIVES:
0
GOAL: To provide needed fire and rescue services for the residents and
victors of the Town.
OBJECTIVES:
- Complete design work and planning for new fire station.
- Implement new training and qualification standards for personnel.
- Implement confined space rescue and soundfront fire/rescue
programs.
- Design and implementation of recruitment and retention program for
volunteer firefighters.
6. DEPARTMENTAL FUNDING SOURCE(S): General Fund appropriations.
7. DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES --JOB TITLES & NUMBER OF POSITIONS:
JOB TITLE NUMBER
See Departmental Profile for Fire Department.
WRT%WH.CIP VIII - 41

0
0
•
DEPARTMENT: FD-BR FIre-Beach Rescue
C.I.P. PROJECT NO.:
199&97 Rank:
FD-BR-97-01
42 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total
Budget
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year S
Years
Estimated
Appropriations
Year I
Cast
to Date
FY
FY 1997-98
1998-99
FY 1999-00
FY 2M-01
FY 2001-11
199697
$87,gpp
1
1 0
0
0
0
0
0
DESCRIPTION: Lifeguard and beach rescue equipment
l HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 40
• Land Use Policy Consideration: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 0
• Timing Considerations: -S
• Project Interdependence Considerations: -S
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 0
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 31
I ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT H
MRT%KDH.CIP
VIII — 42

I. Public Works - Administration (PW-A)
In addition to the capital needs and projects listed in the following
pages, the department anticipates the need for several smaller ticket
items. These include a dual axle trailer for hauling a mower or tractor,
additional hand tools and a tool box, a tire changer, a copy machine, an
engine system analyzer, a mowing tractor, a desk, a chair, and a filing
cabinet. It is anticipated that these items will be requested within the
next 5 years.
A departmental profile follows. Work sheets describing and evaluating the
department's project requests are also included.
MRT\KM.CIP VIII - 43

L�
0
TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
DEPARTMENTAL PROFILE
1. DEPARTMENT: Public Works - Administration (PW-A)
2. LOCATION/ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1719
701 West Ocean Bay Boulevard
Kill Devil Hills, NC 27948
3. TELEPHONE NO.: [phone]
4. DEPARTMENT HEAD: Charles Smith, Director
5. DEPARTMENTAL GOAL AND OBJECTIVES:
GOAL: To efficiently administer all the public works departments and provide
central services to all other Town departments.
OBJECTIVES:
- Oversee the prompt and efficient handling of citizen and visitor requests
and concerns for all public works departments.
- Provide clean and efficient office and work space for all Town departments.
- Maintain Town buildings and beautify the Town through continued upkeep of
grounds, parks, recreational facilities, and beach accesses.
- Care for an maintain the Town's vehicle and equipment fleet in a timely and
efficient manner.
6. DEPARTMENTAL FUNDING SOURCE(S): General Fund appropriations.
7. DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES --JOB TITLES & NUMBER OF POSITIONS:
JOB TITLE
Public Works Director
Fleet Maintenance Supervisor
Buildings and Ground Supervisor
Secretary III
Equipment Mechanic II
Equipment Mechanic I
Groundskeeper II
Groundskeeper III
Streets Supervisor
Senior Equipment Operator
MRT\KDH.CIP
VIII - 44
NUMBER
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

Equipment Operator 2
Sanitation
Supervisor 1
Sanitation
Crew Leader 2
Sanitation
Equipment Operator II 5
Sanitation
Equipment Operator III 2
Sanitation
Equipment Mechanic 1
Sanitation
Worker 2
HRT%l=.CIP VIII - 45

•
DEPARTNOM PW-A Public Works -Administration C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank
PW-A-97-06 48 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year I Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Yeats
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-99 1999-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Replace John Deere WO budw
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 25
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: I
• Timing Considerations: -5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 5
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: 0
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 27
II ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT N
traT%KDH.Cry
VIII - 46

i
•
DEPARTMENT: PW-A Public Works - Administration C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 19%-97 Ranic
PW-A-97-11 55 of 100
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Radio system replace/upgrade
1 HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 20
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: I
• Timing Considerations: -5
• Project interdependence Considerations: 5
• Long -Term Frscal impact Considerations: 0
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 0
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 22
I ACPIVPTY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT n
waT%KDH.CIP
VIII - 47

J. Public Works - Public Buildings (PW-PB)
• The Public Works - Public Buildings Department (PW-PB) is responsible for all
building and grounds in Kill Devil Hills. The department has a substantial list
of capital needs/projects. In addition, the department advises that it will
require a storage building for chemicals and equipment as well as an irrigation
system for the administration Building and Planning and Finance and Tax Building
in the near future. Also, the department advises that the flag pole at the Police
and Fire Complex at 1634 North Croatan Highway should be replaced.
A departmental profile follows. Work sheets describing and evaluating the
department's project requests are also included.
is
YRT%KM.CIP VIII - 48

n
LJ
TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
1. DEPARTMENT:
2. LOCATION/ADDRESS:
3. TELEPHONE NO.:
DEPARTMENTAL PROFILE
Public Works - Public Buildings (PW-PB)
P.O. Box 1719
701 West Ocean Bay Boulevard
Kill Devil Hills, NC 27948
[phone]
4. DEPARTMENT HEAD: Charles Smith, Director
5. DEPARTMENTAL GOAL AND OBJECTIVES:
GOAL: To maintain and construct facilities adequate to meet the Town's
growing needs and to implement improvements designated in the
recreational facilities plan and shoreline access plan.
OBJECTIVES:
- To begin construction of a joint finance/planning office building.
- To reconstruct the present tax and finance department for the
Police Department.
- To begin design on a new fire station.
- To provide funding -for identified recreational facilities and
shoreline accesses and set aside funds for future projects as
shown in those separate capital programs.
- Have a master plan prepared for the Croatan Highway complex.
- To continue maintenance of existing Town facilities.
6. DEPARTMENTAL FUNDING SOURCE(S): General Fund appropriations.
7. DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES --JOB TITLES & NUMBER OF POSITIONS:
JOB TITLE
NUMBER
See Departmental Profile for Public Works Administration.
WRT\KDHXIP
VIII - 49

•
0
DEPARTMENT: PW-PB Public Works -Public Buildings
C.I.P. PROJECT NO.:
199&97 Rank:
PW-PB-97-30
35 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total
Budget
Estimated
Appropriations
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year S
Years
Oust
to Date
FY
FY 1997-98
1998-99
FY 1999-00
FY 2000-01
FY 2MI-11
199697
$150,0W
1 01
0
0
0
0
0
DESCRIPTION: Bike trail at Hayman Boulevard (east -west)
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 30
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 2
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 2
• Timing Considerations: -5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: +5
• Long -Term Fiscal Impad Considerations: 0
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 0
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total paints - 34
I ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
MRT%KDH.CIP
VIII - 50

E
DEPARTMENT: PW-PB Public Works -Public Buildings C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PW PB-97-31 48 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget .
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Yeats
Cost to Date F' FY 1997-99 1999-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$501000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Ground trader w/mowers
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 25
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 1
• Timing Considerations: -5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 5
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 0
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Cmsiderations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 27
I ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT H
HRT\►DH.CIP
VIII - 51

s
•
0
DEPARTMENT: PW-PB Public Works -Public Buildings
C.I.P. PROJECT NO.:
1996-97 Rank:
PW-PB-07-32
69 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total
Budget
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Years
Estimated
Appropriations
Year 1
Cost
to Date
FY
FY 1997-98
1998-99
FY 1999-00
FY 2000-01
FY 2001-11
199ti-97
$100,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
DESCRIPTION: Sta mse building w/shed for grounds equipment, pesticide, aced, fertilizer, office, etc.
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 50
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 3
• Timing Considerations: 2
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 5
• Long Tenn Fiscal Impact Considerations: 2
• Cast Effm iveness Considerations: 2
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary. Total points - 65
N ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT I
MRT%KDH.CIP
VIII — 52

•
•
DEPARTMENT: PW-PB Public Works -Public Buildings C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PW-PB-97-33 59 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year I Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-98 1999-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
199697
$39,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: One ton truck with 12' dump body
HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 20
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 1
• Tuning g Considerations: -S
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 5
• Long -Tenn Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: -2
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 20
N AcnvrrY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT Y
HRT%KOH.CIP
VIII — 53

C�
E
DEPARTMENT: PW-PB Public Works -Public Buildings
C.I.P. PROJECT NO.:
1996-97 Rank:
PW-PB-97-34
101 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Taal
Budget
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year S
Years
Estimated
Appropriations
Year 1
Cost
to Date
FY
FY 1997-99
1999-99
FY 1999-00
FY 2000-01
FY 2001-11
1996.97
$115001000
0
0
0
0
0
0
DESCRIPTION: Mold -ante center
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: S
• Land Use Policy Considerations: I
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 0
• Timing Considerations: -S
• Project Interdependence Considerations: -S
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: -S
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - -9
I ACPIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT H
MRT%KDH.CIP
VIII - 54

•
•
•
DEPARTMENT: PW-PB Public Buildings -Public Works
C.I.P. PROJECT NO.:
1996-97 Rank:
PW-PB-97-35
43 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total
Budget
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Years
Estimated
Appropriations
Year I
Cost
to Date
FY
FY 1997-98
1998-99
FY 1999-00
FY 2000-01
FY 2001-11
199697
$375,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
DESCRIPTION: Land aNuld"
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 20
• Laud Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Gaol Considerations: 0
• Timing Considerations: -2
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 5
-• Long Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 3
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: 3
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 30
R ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT' SOURCE AMOUNT I
WRT%KDH.CIP
VIII - 55

•
•
0
DEPARTMENT: PW-PB Public Works -Public Building C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PW PB-95-36 22 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
199697
$100,000 0 0 0 .0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Storm proaQng public buildings
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 40
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 0
• Timing Considerations: 0
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 0
• Long Term Fiscal Impad Considerations: 5
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: S
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - Sl
II At:RIV1TY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE - AMOUNT R
WRT%KDH.CIP
VIII — 56

•
•
DEPARTMENT: PW-PB Public Works -Public Buildings C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PW-PB-97-37 3 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Years
Cast to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$60,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Shop addidm for fleet management
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 50
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: S
• Timing Considerations: 3
• Project interdependence Considerations: S
• Lang Tenn Fiscal Impact Considerations: S
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 5
• State a Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 74
I ACTiviTY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
MRT\KDH.CIP
VIII - 57

•
0
0
DEPARTMENT: PW-PB Public Works -Public Buildings C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 199&97 Rank:
PW-PB-97-38 12 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year I Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-98 1999-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$20,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Concrete dab for fleet maintenance area
i HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 50
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 5
• Timing Considerations: 2
• Project Interdependence Considerations: -5
• Long Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 5
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: 5
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 63
II ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT 1
MRT%KDH.CIP
VIII — 58

0
•
DEPARTMENT: PW-PB Public Works -Public Buildings C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PW-PB-97-39 38 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriatiau Year I Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996.97
$40,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Front cad alignment machine
HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 30
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 1
• Timing Considerations: -S
• Project Interdependence Considerations: S
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 1
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 0
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
Is Summary: Total points - 33
N ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT N
NRT%KDH.CIP
VIII - 59

K. Public Works - Streets (PW-S) and Powell Bill (PW-POB)
• The Public Works Department generally oversees street maintenance
and construction in the Town. In addition to the capital
needs/projects that are listed on the following pages, the
department advises that an additional pickup truck will be
required within the planning period.
A departmental profile follows. Work sheets describing and
evaluating the department's project requests are also included.
•
•
WRT%=H.CIo VIII - 60

0
0
TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
1. DEPARTMENT:
2. LOCATION/ADDRESS:
3. TELEPHONE NO.:
DEPARTMENTAL PROFILE
Public Works - Streets (PW-S)
P.O. Box 1719
701 West Ocean Bay Boulevard
Kill Devil Hills, NC 27948
[phone]
4. DEPARTMENT HEAD: Charles Smith, Director
5. DEPARTMENTAL GOAL AND OBJECTIVES:
GOAL: To provide and maintain the Town's streets and drainage and right
of ways for the Town citizens and visitors.
OBJECTIVES:
Continue to maintain and upgrade town street signs including
warning, regulatory, and caution signs.
Continue to maintain right of ways by mowing, trimming, and
clearing debris.
Continue street and drainage improvements within the guidelines
outlined by the Street Improvement Committee and Board of
Commissioners.
6. DEPARTMENTAL FUNDING SOURCE(S): General Fund appropriations.
7. DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES --JOB TITLES & NUMBER OF POSITIONS:
JOB TITLE NUMBER
See Departmental Profile for Public Works Administration.
MRT\KDH.CIP
VIII - 61

0
0
TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
1. DEPARTMENT:
2. LOCATION/ADDRESS:
DEPARTMENTAL PROFILE
Public Works - Powell Bill (PW-POB)
P.O. Box 1719
701 West Ocean Bay Boulevard
Kill Devil Hills, NC 27948
3. TELEPHONE NO.: [phone]
4. DEPARTMENT HEAD: Charles Smith, Director
5. DEPARTMENTAL GOAL AND OBJECTIVES:
SEE DEPARTMENT PROFILE FOR PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
6. DEPARTMENTAL FUNDING SOURCE(S): General Fund appropriations.
7. DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES --JOB TITLES & NUMBER OF POSITIONS:
JOB TITLE
NUMBER
See Departmental Profile for Public Works Administration.
MRT\KDH.CIP
VIII - 62

0
DEPARTMENT: PW-S/PW-POB Public Works-Streets/Powell Bill C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PW-S-97-01 19 Of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total age
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Years
Cast to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$20,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Expand Storage Shed
A HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 45
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 5
• Timing Considerations: 0
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 5
• Long Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: I
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 2
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 54
ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT N
MRT\►DH.CIP
VIII - 63

9
•
w
DEPARTMENT: PS-S/PW POB Publk Works-Streets/Powell Bill C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 199&97 Rank:
PW-S-97-06 29 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Years
Cast to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996.97
$ 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: SW& aide damp track
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 40 Y
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 3
• Timing Considerations: 0
• Project Interdependence Considerations: S
• Long Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 2
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Taal points - 46
N ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT I
MRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 64

0
0
DEPARTMENT: PW-S Public Works -Streets C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PW-S-97-206 81 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total ergot
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Years
Cast to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$210,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Most arm UW& Signals
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 20
• band Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Gael Considerations: 0
• Timing Considerations: -S
• Project Interdependence Caasidetations: -5
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: -S
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Spacial Coosidentions: 0
• Summary: Total points - 6
II Ammy FROM - TO . AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT R
WRT%KDH.CIP
VIII — 65

•
7
DEPARTMENT: PW-S Public Works -Streets
C.I.P. PROJECT NO.:
1996.97 Rank:
PW-S-97-207
59 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total
Budget
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Years
Estimated
Appropriations
Year 1
Cost
to Date
FY
FY 1997-98
1999-99
FY 1999-00
FY 2000-01
FY 2001-11
1996-97
$45,000
i
i 0
0
0
0
0
0
DESCRIPTION: It—khoe
HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 20
• Land Use Policy Consideration: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 2
• Timing Considerations: -5 (Replacement for existing John Deere 310C)
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 5
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: -3
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 20
1 ACPIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
MRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 66

C1
A
0
DEPARTMENT: PW-S Public Works -Streets
C.I.P. PROJECT NO.:
1996-97 Rank:
PW-S-97-208
59 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total
Budget
Year 2
FY 1997-99
Year 3
1998-99
Year 4
FY 1999-00
Year S
FY 2000-01
Years
FY 2001-11
Estimated
Cost
Appropriations
to Date
Year 1
FY
1996-97
$75,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
DESCRIPTION: wont -rod loader
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 20
• Land Use Policy Considerations: I
• Departmental Goa( Considerations: 2
• Timing Considerations: -S (Replacement for John Deere 440C)
• Project Interdependence Considerations: S
• Lang -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: -3
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary. Total points - 20
II AcnvrrY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT H
MRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 67

0
0
DEPARTMENT: PW-S Public Works -Streets C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PW-S-97-209 77 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Yeats
Cast to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY IM-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2WI-11
1"&97
$160,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Motor grader
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 20
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 2
• Timing Considerations: -S (Replacement for Ga1Gon grader that has more than 10 years of life)
• Project Interdependence Considerations: S
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: -3
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary. Total points - 10
I ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT N
YRT%KDH.CIP
VIII — 68

A
A
0
DEPARTMENT: PW-S Pubfic Works -Streets C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PW-S-97-210 59 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cast to Date FY FY 1997-98 1999-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$90,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Single aide dump track
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 20
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 2
• Timing Considerations: -5 (Replacement for tandem dump truck needed now to replace 1979 Mack #303)
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 5
• Lang -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: -3
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary. Total points - 20
ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT N
VRT\►DH.CrP
VIII - 69

•
0
DEPARTMENT: PW-S Public Works -Streets C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PW-S-97-211 79 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Trial Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Years
cost to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 IY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$90,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Single axle dump truck
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 10
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 0
• Timing Considerations: -S (New vehicle. Very low priority. Needed in wid S years.)
• Project Interdependence Considerations: S
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: -3
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary. Total points - 8
R AcnvrrY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT u
MRT%KDH.CIP
VIII — 70

•
•
DEPARTMENT: PW-S Public Works -Streets C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PW-S-97-214 65 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
TOW Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2WI-11
199697
$18,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Compaction roller
N MSTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 20
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 1
• Timing Considerations: -S (Replacement needed within S years to replace 1983 Bonn roller.)
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 5
• Lang -Terns Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: -3
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Comiderations: 0
• Speciaal Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 19
ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT I
YRT\KDM.CIP
VIII — 71

•
•
DEPARTMENT: PW-S Public Works -Streets C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PW-S-97-215 81 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Years
Cost to Date FY FY IM-98 1998-99 FY IM-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2MI-11
199697
$115,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Rubber tire excavator
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 10
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 0
• Departmental Gael Considerations: 0
• Timing Considerations: -S (new)
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 5
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 4
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 6
II ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT Y
MRT%KDH.CIP
VIII — 72

•
0
DEPARTMENT: PW-S Public Works -Streets
C.I.P. PROJECT NO.:
1996-97 Rank:
PW-S-97-216
87 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total
Budget
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year S
Years
Estimated
Appropriation
Year 1
Cast
to Date
FY
FY 1997-98
1998-99
FY 1999.00
FY 2000-01
FY 2001-11
1996-97
$40,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
DESCRIPTION: Boom mower tractor
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 10
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 0
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 0
• Timing Considerations: -S (replacement for 1963 Fond).
• Project Interdependence Considerations: S
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: -S
l• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
o Summary: Total poi - S
N ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT u
vaT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 73

•
•
DEPARTMENT: PW-S Public Works -Streets C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PW S-97-217 87 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Flail mower trader
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 10
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 0
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 0
• Timing Considerations: -5 (Replacement, but Dot needed for 15 years. Town has recently purchased a Ford New Holland (#325)
which can accommodate Alamo apparads.)
• Project interdependence Considerations: 5
• Lang Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: -5
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 5
ACTIv1TY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
MRT%KDH.CIP
VIII - 74

•
•
DEPARTMENT: PW-S Public Works -Streets
C.I.P. PROJECT NO.:
1996-97 Rank:
PW S-97-218
91 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total
Budget
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Years
Estimated
Appropriations
Year 1
Cost
to Date
FY
FY 1997-98
1998-99
FY 1999-00
FY 2000-01
FY 2001-11
1996-97
$30,000
1 0
0
0
0
0
0
DESCRIPTION: Broom tractor
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 10
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 0
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 0
• Timing Considerations: -S (Replacement for 1963 Fond #307. Needed in S years)
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 3
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: -5
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 3
II ACTIv1TY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT h
WRT%KDH.CIP
VIII - 75

•
0
0
DEPARTMENT: PW-S Public Works -Streets C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PW-S-97-219 99 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year I Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$15,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Hydroseeder - biAw mounted
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 0
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 0
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 0
• Timing Considerations: -5 (new)
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 5
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: -5
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
is Summary: Total points - -5
H ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
NRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 76
0

0
0
DEPARTMENT: PW-S Public Works -Streets C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PW-S-97-220 99 Of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Yeats
Cost to Date FY FY IM-99 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
199&97
$15,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Laser level
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 0
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 0
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 0
• Timing Considerations:-5 (new)
• Project Interdependence Considerations: S
• Long Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: -5 (Have a transit now.)
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - -S
0 AcnvITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
MRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 77

•
0
�7,
DEPARTMENT: PW-S Public Works -Streets
C.I.P. PROJECT NO.:
1996-97 Rank:
PW S-97-221
96 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total
Budget
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year S
Years
Estimated
Appropriations
Year 1
Cost
to Date
FY
FY 1997-99
1998-99
FY 1999-00
FY =-01
FY MOO-11
1"&97
$200,000
0
1 0
0
0
0
0
DESCRIPTION: Ditch deener-spider
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 0
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 0
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 0
• Timing Considerations: -5 (new)
• Project Interdependence Considerations: S
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: -2
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - -2
0 ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
MRT\KDH.CIP
VIII - 78

•
0
DEPARTMENT: PW-S Public Works -Streets
C.I.P. PROJECT NO.:
1996-97 Rank:
PW S-97-222
98 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total
Budget
Estimated
Appropriations
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year S
Years
Cast
to Date
FY
FY 1997-98
1998-99
FY 1999-00
FY 20OD-01
FY MOO-11
1"&97
$150,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
DESCRIPTION: Slurry seal applicator truck
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 0
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 0
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 0
• Timing Considerations: -S (new)
• Project Interdependence Considerations: S
• Long -Tenn Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: -3
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points -3
II ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT Il
WRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 79

•
0
0
DEPARTMENT: PW-S Public Works -Streets
C.I.P. PROJECT NO.:
1996-97 Rank:
PW S-97-223
96 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total
Budget
Estimated
Appropriations
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Years
Cast
to Date
FY
FY 1997-98
1998-99
FY 1999-00
FY 2000-01
FY 2MI-11
1"&97
$125,000
01
0
0
0
0
0
DESCRIPTION: Truck mounted pothole patcher (with a preheater to Leagdump asphalt)
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 0
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 0
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 0
• Timing Considerations: -5 (new)
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 5
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: -2
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - -2
II ACTEVTTY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT U
MRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 80

•
•
DEPARTMENT: PW-S Public Works -Streets C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PW-S-97-224 95 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$225,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Water jet/vacumn truck (used for cleaning ailverts)
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 0
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 0
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 0
• Timing Considerations: -5 (new)
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 5
• Long Tenn Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: -1
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 20
H ACPIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
MRT\ImH.CIP
VIII - 81

L. Public Works - Solid Waste (PW-SW)
. The Solid Waste Division of the Public Works Department advises that it will
require four additional pickup trucks in the planning period.
s
•
A departmental profile follows. Work sheets describing and evaluating the
department's project requests are also included.
WRT%KM.civ VIII - 82

0
0
is
TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
1. DEPARTMENT:
2. LOCATION/ADDRESS:
3. TELEPHONE NO.:
DEPARTMENTAL PROFILE
Public Works - Solid Waste (PW-SW)
P.O. Box 1719
701 West Ocean Bay Boulevard
Kill Devil Hills, NC 27948
[phone]
4. DEPARTMENT HEAD: Charles Smith, Director
5. DEPARTMENTAL GOAL AND OBJECTIVES:
GOAL: To provide for the collection and disposal of residential,
commercial and beach access solid waste, and the operations of the
Town's recycling center.
OBJECTIVES:
To research methods to cut cost of collection and disposal of
solid waste in an environmentally sensitive manner.
To continue recycling and other resource reduction methods that
will benefit both the environment, citizens, and the Town's cost
for providing this service.
To provide for the pick-up of bulk trash and limbs/yard debris for
residents.
6. DEPARTMENTAL FUNDING SOURCE(S): General Fund appropriations.
7. DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES --JOB TITLES & NUMBER OF POSITIONS:
JOB TITLE
NUMBER
See Departmental Profile for Public Works Administration.
VRT\KDHXIP
VIII - 83

•
•
DEPARTMENT: PW-SW Public Works -Solid Waste C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PW-SW-97-01 22 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cast to Date FY FY 1997-98 1999-99 FY IM-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
199&97
$120,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Waste collection truck (commercial)
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 40
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 1
• Timing Considerations: 0
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 5
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 3
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 1
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points — 51
II ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT H
MRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 84

•
•
•
DEPARTMENT: PW-SW Public Works -Solid Waste
C.I.P. PROJECT NO.:
1996-97 Rank:
PW-SW-97-06
21 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total
Budget
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Years
Estimated
Appropriations
Year 1
Cast
to Date
FY
FY 1997-99
1999-99
FY 1999-00
FY 2000-01
FY 2001-11
1996-97
$400,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
DESCRIPTION: Tab grinder with truck and Mader
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 35
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 3
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 3
• Timing Considerations: 6
• Project Interdependence Considerations: -5 (Town should purdnase in conjunction with other localities.)
• Long Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 3
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 3
• State of Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 5 (Town currently stockpiles debris which is not approved.)
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 53
I ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT H
WRT%KDH.CIP
VIII — 85

•
0
DEPARTMENT: PW-SW Public Works -Solid Waste C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PW-SW-97-07 26 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2=-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$120,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Waste collection trndr (commercial)
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 35
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 1
• Timing Considerations: 0
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 5
• Long -Tenn Fiscal Impact Considerations: 3
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: 1
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 46
II ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
MRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 86

•
0
DEPARTMENT: PW-SW Public Works -Solid Waste C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PW-SW-97-08 69 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Trial Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year I Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$85,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Recycling truck (curb side)
I IIISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 20
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Gael Considerations: 0
• Timing Considerations: -5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 0
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: -5
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 5
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 16
II ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
WRT\KDH.CIP
VIII - 87

•
•
DEPARTMENT: PW-SW Public Works -Solid Waste C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PW-Sw-97-09 69 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cast to Date FY FY 1997-99 1998-99 FY 1999-W FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$85,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Recycling to Kk (c•rb side)
11 HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 20
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 0
• Timing Considerations: -5
• Project interdependence Considerations: 0
• Long -Terns Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: -5
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 5
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 16
I ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
waT%KDH.cIP
VIII — 88

•
0
DEPARTMENT: PW-SW Public Works -Solid Waste C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PW-SW-97-10 48 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year I Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cast to Date FY FY 1997-99 1999-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$70,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Boom truck
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 35
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Coal Considerations: 1
• Timing Considerations: -5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: -5
• Lang -Tenn Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: 0
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 27
II ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT H
MRT\KM C I P
VIII - 89

•
•
•
DEPARTMENT: PW-SW Public Works -Solid Waste C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PW-SW 97-11 66 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year I Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Years
Cast to Date FY FY 1997-99 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY M-01 FY 2001-11
1996A7
$80,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Roll -off truck
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Couiderations: 25
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 1
• Timing Considerations: -5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: -5
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 0
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 17
d ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT 11
MRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 90

•
•
•
DEPARTMENT: PW-SW Public Works -Solid Waste C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PW-SW-97-12 24 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cost to Date FY FY IM-98 1998-99 FY 1999.00 FY 2000-01 FY 2MI-11
199697
$120,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Open building
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 45
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 0
• Timing Considerations: -5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 5
• Lang -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 1
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: 2
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 49
II ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
WRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 91

9
•
DEPARTMENT: PW-SW Public Works -Solid Waste C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PW-Sw-97-13 76 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cast to Date FY FY IM-98 1998-99 FY 1999.00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
199697
$85,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Recycling truck (curb side)
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 15
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 0
• Timing Considerations: -5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 0
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: -5
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 5
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 11
II ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT u
WRT%KDH.CIP
VIII - 92

0
0
DEPARTMENT: PW-SW Public Works -Solid Waste C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PW-SW-97-14 81 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cast to Date FY FY 1997-99 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY M-01 FY 2MI-11
1996-97
$33,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: SW gallon recycling containers (5)
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 15
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 0
• Timing Considerations: -5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 0
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: -5
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 6
II Acnvrry FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT H
MRT\KDH.CIP
VIII - 93

•
i
DEPARTMENT: PW-SW Public Works -Solid Waste
C.I.P. PROJECT NO.:
1996-97 Rank:
PW-SW-97-15
81 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total
Budget
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Years
Estimated
Appropriations
Year 1
Cost
to Date
FY
FY 1997-98
1998-99
FY 1999.00
FY 2000-01
FY 2001-11
1996.97
$35,000
1 01
0
0
0
0
0
DESCRIPTION: 40 yard roll oft replacements (10)
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 15
• Laud Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 0
• Timing Considerations: -5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 0
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: -5
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Spacial Considerations: 0
• Summary. TOW points - 6
II ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
WRT\KDH.CIP
VIII - 94

0
0
DEPARTMENT: PW-SW Public Works -Solid Waste C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PW-SW-97-16 10 Of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Years
Cost to Date FY 199697 FY 1997-99 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
$50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Paving of back lot and drainage improvements
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: SO
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 3
• Timing Considerations: S
• Project Interdependence Considerations: S
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 2
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 3
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 69
0 ACTIv1TY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT U
WRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 95

9
DEPARTMENT: PW-SW Public Works -Solid Waste C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PW-SW-97-17 27 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$45,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Water purifying system for wash -out pit
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 40
• Land Use Policy Considerations: I
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 1
• Timing Considerations: 0
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 5
• Long Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: I
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: 3
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 5
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 56
h Amway FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT N
NRT%KDH.CIP
VIII — 96

0
•
DEPARTMENT: PW-Sw Public Works -Solid Waste C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 199&97 Rank:
PW-SW-97-18 54 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Years
Cast to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2WI-11
199697
$70,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Beady comber refuse truck for beach trash barrel pickup
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 25
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 0
• Timing Considerations: -5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 5
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: -5
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
Is Summary: Total points - 23
I ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
WRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 97

•
0
0
DEPARTMENT: PW-SW Public Works -Solid Waste C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PW SW-97-19 15 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cast to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
199ti-97
$140,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Waste colleetlou truck (residential)
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 45
• Land Use Policy Considerations: I
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 2
• Timing Considerations: -2
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 5
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 1
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 5
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary. Total points - 57
II ACTIVTPY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
WRT\►DH.CIP
VIII — 98

0
•
DEPARTMENT: PW-SW Public Works -Solid Waste C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
PW-Sw-97-20 15 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cast to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$140,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Waste collection truck (residential)
i
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 45
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 2
• Timing Considerations: -2
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 5
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 1
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 5
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary. Total points — 57
II ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
WRT%KDH.CIP
VIII — 99

M. Utilities - Water Administration (U-WA)
In additional to the extensive lists of capital needs/projects that follow, the
Utilities Department - Water Administration (U-WA) anticipates the need for a copy
machine in the next five years.
A departmental profile follows. Work sheets describing and evaluating the
department's project requests are also included.
HRT\WH.CIP VIII - 100

TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
DEPARTMENTAL PROFILE
1. DEPARTMENT: Utilities - Water Administration (U-WA)
2. LOCATION/ADDRESS: 107 Town Hall Drive
Kill Devil Hills, NC 27948
3. TELEPHONE NO.: [phone]
4. DEPARTMENT HEAD: Darrell Merrell, Director
5. DEPARTMENTAL GOAL AND OBJECTIVES:
GOAL: To provide the highest possible level of service at the most
economical cost to the customer with timely, accurate, and
customer friendly service as our top priority, through the use of
skilled and motivated employees.
OBJECTIVES:
- Continued implementation of our water meter register change -out
program.
- Complete water ordinance update.
- Continued work on regional water supply contract formula.
Continue work on regional water supply contract formula.
Complete water/finance computer software integration.
- Continued training of our employees dedicated to improve customer
service.
6. DEPARTMENTAL FUNDING SOURCE(S): Water Fund.
7. DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES --JOB TITLES & NUMBER OF POSITIONS:
JOB TITLE NUMBER
Utilities Director 1
Assistant Utilities Director 1
Administrative Services Supervisor 1
Utility Clerk 2
Meter Reader II 1
Meter Reader I 1
Chief Plant Operator 1
Plant Operator II 1
• Plant Operator I 2
VRT\KDH.CIP VIII - 101

Water Systems Supervisor 1
0 Line Maintenance Crew Leader 1
0
0
Line Maintenance Worker
WWTP Chief Operator
WWTP Operator
WRT\WH.CIP VIII - 102
3
1
1

0
•
DEPARTMENT: U-WA Utilities -Water Adagnistration C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
U-WA-97-04 35 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cast to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Building repalm (root, skiing, etc.)
l HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 40
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: I
• Timing Considerations: -5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: -S
• Lang -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: 2
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 34
N ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
MRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 103

0
•
DEPARTNUIM U-WA Utilities -Water Administration C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
U-WA-97-05 6 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year
Cast to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2MI-I1
199&97
$25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Renovate building to meet American's with Disabilities Act (ADA) Standards
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 45
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 5
• Timing Considerations: 7
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 5
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 2
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 0
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 5
• Special Considerations: 2
• Summary: Total points - 72
I AC'IIVrrY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT I
MRT%KDH.CIP
VIII — 104

•
0
DEPARTMENT: U-WA Utilities -Water Administration
C.I.P. PROJECT NO.:
199E-97 Rank:
U-WA-97-06
77 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total
Budget
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Years
Estimated
Appropriations
Year 1
Cost
to Date
FY
FY 1997-98
1998-99
FY IM-00
FY 2000-01
FY 2001-11
199697
$350,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
DESCRIPTION: Office building (new)
l HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 20
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 0
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 0
• Timing Considerations: -5
• Project interdependence Considerations: 5
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: 0
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 10
9 ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
MRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 105

i
LIN
0
DEPARTMENT: U-WA Utilities -Water Administration C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
U-WA-97-07 87 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cast to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Meter reading equipment (microprooessing rystem)
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 5
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 0
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 0
• Timing g Considerations: -5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 5
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: 0
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 5
II Acnv1TY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
WRT\KMCIP
VIII — 106

N. Utilities - Water Plant (U-WP)
• In addition to the extensive list of capital needs/projects that follow,
the Utilities Department - Water Plant (U-WP) anticipates the need for two
additional pickup trucks during the planning period.
0
40
A departmental profile follows. Work sheets describing and evaluating the
department's project requests are also included.
MRT\WH.CIP VIII - 107

TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
DEPARTMENTAL PROFILE
1. DEPARTMENT: Utilities - Water Plant (U-WP)
2. LOCATION/ADDRESS: 107 Town Hall Drive
Kill Devil Hills, NC 27948
3. TELEPHONE NO.: [phone]
4. DEPARTMENT HEAD: Darrell Merrell
5. DEPARTMENTAL GOAL AND OBJECTIVES:
GOAL: To provide safe, clean, potable drinking water meeting all water quality
standards as imposed by the Safe Water Drinking Act, using experienced
state certified plant operators contributing to the health, safety and
economic well-being of our customers, and to provide for the growth and
development of our employees.
OBJECTIVES:
- Continued compliance with maximum containment levels of the Safe Water
Drinking Act.
- Provide safe, potable drinking water for our customers.
- Improve the appearance of our water plant and pumping facilities.
- Continued training of water plant employees in the objective of the Safe
Water Drinking Act.
6. DEPARTMENTAL FUNDING SOURCE(S): General Fund appropriations.
7. DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES --JOB TITLES & NUMBER OF POSITIONS:
JOB TITLE
NUMBER
See Departmental Profile for Water Administration Department.
VRT%KDH.CIP
VIII - 108

0
•
•
DEPARTMENT: U-WP Utilities -Water Plant C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
U-WP-97-02 3 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cast to Date FY FY IM-99 1999-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2MI-11
199697
$50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Repair or replace M3 high service pump
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 50
• land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 5
• Timing Considerations: 10
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 0
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 3
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: 5
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary. Total points — 74
II ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT H
MRT%KDH.CIP
VIII — 109

•
•
DEPARTMENT: U-WP Utilities -Water Plant C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
U-WP-97-03 11 Of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-99 1999-99 FY 1999.00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Water level indicators
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 50
• Land Use Policy Considerations: I
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 4
• Timing Considerations: S
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 0
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 2
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 3
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 65
II ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
VRT%KDH.CIP
011MltU;

•
•
DEPARTMENT: U-WP Utilities -Water Plant C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
U-WP-97-11 59 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-99 1999-99 FY 1999.00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
199&97
$30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Computer system for telemetry
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 25
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 1
• Timing Considerations: -5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: -5
• Lang -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: 3
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 20
II ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
MRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 111

•
•
DEPARTMENT: U-WP Utilities -Water Plant
C.I.P. PROJECT NO.:
1996-97
U-WP-97-12
Rank
19 Of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total
Budget
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Years
Estimated
Appropriations
Year 1
Cost
to Date
FY 1996-97
FY 1997-99
1999-99
FY IM-00
FY 2000-01
FY 2001-11
$235,000
$235,000
0
0
0
0
$235,000
DESCRIPTION: Water tower painting
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 40
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 5
• Tinning Considerations: 5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: -5
• Long -Tam Fiscal Impact Considerations: 3
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 5
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 54
h ACPIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT 11
WRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 112

•
DEPARTMENT: U-WP Utilities -Water Plant C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
U-WP-97-16 73 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$850,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Water tank construction in north end of Kill Devil iEi111s
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 20
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 1
• Timing Considerations: -S
• Project Interdependence Considerations: -S
• Lang -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: 1
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
is Summary: Total points - 13
I ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
WRT\KDH.CIP
VIII - 113

•
•
DEPARTMENT: U-WP Utilities -Water Plant C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
U-WP-97-17 31 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cast to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Replace 60 by pump motors
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 40
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 3
• Timing Considerations: -5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: -5
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 2
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: 2
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 38
II ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT h
MRT\rmH. CI P
VIII — 114

•
0
0
DEPARTMENT: U-WP Utilities -Water Plant C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
U-WP-97-18 38 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Years
Cast to Date FY FY 1997-99 1998-99 FY 1999.00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
199ti-97
$50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Replace 100 Town Hall Pump Station pump motors
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 35
• Land Use Policy Considerations: I
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 3
• Timing Considerations: -5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: -5
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 2
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: 2
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
is Summary: Total points - 33
II ACITVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE. AMOUNT u
WRT\KDH.CIP
VIII - 115

A
•
DEPARTMENT: U-WP Utilities -Water Plant
C.I.P. PROJECT NO.:
1996-97 Rank:
U-WP-97-19
51 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total
Budget
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Years
Estimated
Appropriations
Year 1
Cost
to Date
FY
FY 1997-98
1998-99
FY 1999-W
FY 2000-01
FY 2001-11
1996-97
$150,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
DESCRIPTION: Building maintenance
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 30
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 3
• Timing Considerations: -5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: -5
• Lang -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 1
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 1
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Spacial Considerations: 0
• Summary. Total points - 26
U ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
WRT\KDHXIP
VIII — 116

•
•
DEPARTMENT: U-WP Utilities -Water Plant
C.I.P. PROJECT NO.:
1996-97 Rank:
U-WP-97-20
74 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total
Budget
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Years
Estimated
Appropriations
Year 1
Cost
to Date
FY
FY 1997-98
1998-99
FY 1999-00
FY 2000-01
FY 2001-I1
1996-97
$100,000
01
0
0
0
0
0
DESCRIPTION: Upgrade SCADA systems
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 20
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 1
• Timing Considerations: -5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: -5
• Lang Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: 0
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Spacial Considerations: 0
is Summary: Total points - 12
d ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT H
WRT\KDH.CIP
VIII - 117

0. Utilities - Water Systems (U-WS)
• Since the initiation of the Capital Improvements Planning Process,
an agreement has been reached between Dare County Regional Water
Authority and the Towns of Kill Devil Hills and Nags Head. As a
result of the agreement, Dare County Regional Water Authority has
assumed all water production responsibilities while the Town has
retained an allocation in the system. Kill Devil Hills is a
wholesale customer allocated 3 million gallons per day, with the
option to purchase additional capacity as needed. Needs have been
analyzed by the Utilities Department in conjunction with the Board
of Commissioners and Dare County led in part to this agreement.
As such, the water systems needs for the Town will be met through
the agreement.
C1
In addition to the extensive of capital needs/projects that
follow, the Utilities Department - Water Systems (U-WS) indicates
the need for 2-inch pumps, all purpose saws, a copy machine, a
2,500 watt generator, a weed trimmer, and carpeting in the Systems
Building within the planning period.
Mkr\KM.CIV VIII - 118

TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
1. DEPARTMENT:
2. LOCATION/ADDRESS:
3. TELEPHONE NO.:
DEPARTMENTAL PROFILE
Utilities - Water Systems (U-WS)
107 Town Hall Drive
Kill Devil Hills, NC 27948
[phone]
4. DEPARTMENT HEAD: Darrell Merrell
5. DEPARTMENTAL GOAL AND OBJECTIVES:
GOAL: To maintain and improve the potable water delivery infrastructure
using state certified water distribution personnel; to provide
efficient and timely installation of new service and repairs to
damaged water facilities; and to ensure and protect water quality,
flow, and pressure for our customers.
OBJECTIVES:
- Commitment to our customer satisfaction and confidence by
providing responsive service and system capacity in a timely,
efficient manner.
- Continued work on water valve location marking and maintenance
program.
- Continued work identifying utility conflicts in connection with
the street improvement project.
- Continued training of water systems personnel in distribution
maintenance and customer service.
6. DEPARTMENTAL FUNDING SOURCE(S): General Fund appropriations.
7. DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES --JOB TITLES & NUMBER OF POSITIONS:
JOB TITLE
NUMBER
See Departmental Profile for Water Administration Department.
MRT\KDH.CIP
VIII - 119

•
UE
DEPARTMENT: U-WS Utilities -Water System C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
U-WS-97-02 6 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-99 1999-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: One ou truck (service truck fully equipped)
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 50
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 5
• Timing Considerations: 5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 5
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 2
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 3
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - -a
H ACTIVITY FROM - To AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT u
WRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 120

•
•
0
DEPARTMENT: U-WS Utilities -Water System C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
U-WS-97-10 51 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2MI-11
1996-97
$40,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Back hoe
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 25
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 1
• Timing Considerations: -5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 5
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: -1
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary- Total points - 26
I AmvrrY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT H
HRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 121

•
•
DEPARTMENT: U-WS Utilities -Water System C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 199&97 Rank:
U-WS-97-12 2 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cast to Date FY FY 1997-99 1999-99 FY IM-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: InA0 6S meters annually
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 50
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 5
• Tuning Considerations: 5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 5
• Lang Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 5
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: 5
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Spacial Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 76
II AC11V1TY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
MRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 122

•
•
DEPARTMENT: U-WS Utilities -water System C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
U-WS-97-13 49 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$75,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: 8th Street maintenance building
i HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 25
• Lard Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 1
• Timing Considerations: -5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 5
• Lang Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 2
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 29
h ACTIvITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
YRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 123

0
•
L�
DEPARTMENT: U-WS Utilities -Water System C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
U-WS-97-14 5 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriation Year I Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-99 1999-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
199&97
$80,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Meters for emergency connection to Dore County and Nags Head
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 50
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 5
• Timing Considerations: 8
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 5
• Long -Tam Fiscal Impact Considerations: 1
• Cox Effectiveness Considerations: 3
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
Is Summary. Total points - 73
I AcirvITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
wRT%KDH.CIP
VIII - 124

0
A
0
DEPARTMENT: U-WS Utilities -Water System C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 199&97 Rank:
U-WS-97-15 81 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Years
Cast to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2WI-11
1"6-97
$30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Locating equipment for polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and asbestos cement (AC) pipe
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: S
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 0
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 1
• Timing Considerations: -S
• Project Interdependence Considerations: S
• Lang -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: 0
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points — 6
II ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
VRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 125

0
A
0
DEPARTMENT: U-WS Utilities -Water System C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
U-WS-97-16 9 Of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
TOW Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year I Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$7,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Replace all asbestos cement water lines (per EPA)
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: SO
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: S
• Timing Considerations: 2
• Project Interdependence Considerations: -3
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: S
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: 5
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: S
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary. Total points - 70
H ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT H
NRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 126

0
9
DEPARTMENT: U-WS Utilities -Water System C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
U-WS-97-17 46 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cast to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
199697
$900,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Replace all wain line valves
1 IHSTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 30
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 2
• Timing Considerations: -S
• Project Interdependence Considerations: -3
• Long --Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 2
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 2
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 29
II ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
MRT%KDH.CIP
VIII — 127

•
•
DEPARTMENT: U-WS Utilities -Water Systems C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
U-WS-97-18 43 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2MI-11
199&97
$1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Replace all hydrants
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 30
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 3
• Timing Considerations: -5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: -3
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 2
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 2
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 30
II ACTIVrrY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
WRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 128

0
DEPARTMENT: U-WS Utilities -Water System C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
U-WS-97-19 38 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2MI-11
1996A7
$1,110,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Water line size upgrades to 6" minimum
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 30
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 4
• Timing Considerations: -S
• Project Interdependence Considerations: -2
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 2
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: 3
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary. Total points - 33
II ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
MRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 129

P. Utilities - Wastewater (U-WW)
The Utilities Department through its capital project request has
outlined a strategy for meeting the current and future wastewater
needs of the Town. In the short term, wastewater treatment plan
improvements, pump station improvements, and ancillary
improvements totalling $808,000 will be necessary to the Ocean
Acres Wastewater System. In addition, an estimated $3 million
will be required to replace and refurbish the main components of
the system.
The Utilities Department recommends a capital project of $6
million to obtain and refurbish the Outer Banks Beach Club
Wastewater Plant at some point in the future. Similarly, the
Utilities Department included as a capital project, the total
provision of public sewer to the entire Town at an estimated cost
of $30 million dollars, with a preliminary study costing $600,000
as a prerequisite. The department also anticipates that the sewer
system needs in the Town will.include work to remove point source
discharge and apply same to land and to develop a wastewater reuse
irrigation system.
A departmental profile follows. Work sheets describing and
evaluating the department's project requests are also included.
MRT\WH.CIP VIII - 130

TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
• DEPARTMENTAL PROFILE
0
1. DEPARTMENT: Utilities - Wastewater (U-WW)
2. LOCATION/ADDRESS: 107 Town Hall Drive
Kill Devil Hills, NC 27948
3. TELEPHONE NO.: [phone]
4. DEPARTMENT HEAD: Darrell Merrell
5. DEPARTMENTAL GOAL AND OBJECTIVES:
GOAL: To maintain our aged wastewater treatment facility to NCDEHNR
standards and to ensure environmental integrity in the discharge
of treated wastewater effluent. To continue our efforts to
construct improvements to our existing wastewater infrastructure
and our efforts to eliminate our point source discharge. To
provide our customers quality service at the most economical cost
while protecting and conserving our natural resources and
environment.
OBJECTIVES:
- Begin construction of our new wastewater facility rehabilitation
project. -
Continued discharge of high quality effluent discharge from the
Ocean Acres Wastewater Treatment Plant meeting all requirements of
NCDEHNR.
- Protect the environments by collecting and treating wastewater
discharges and continued efforts to remove our point source
discharge through reuse, land application, or other means.
- Continued commitment to customer satisfaction and confidence
through information and education of the public, responsive
service, economical and reasonable rates and improved collection
system capacity.
6. DEPARTMENTAL FUNDING SOURCE(S): General Fund appropriations
7. DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES --JOB TITLES & NUMBER OF POSITIONS:
JOB TITLE
NUMBER
See Departmental Profile for Water Administration Department.
MRT\KW.CIP VIII - 131

0
DEPARTMENT: U-WW Utilities -Wastewater C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
U-W W-97-01 1 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY IM-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
199&97
$808,000 $300,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Wastewater treatment plant improvements, pump station improvements, anciUwy Improvements
II HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: SO
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 2
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 3
• Timing Considerations: 10
• Project Interdependence Considerations: -S
• Lang -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 5
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: S
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: S
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary. Total points - 77
II ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOK II
WRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 132

•
0
DEPARTMENT: U-WW Utilities -Wastewater C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
U-W W-97-04 94 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2=-01 FY 2001-11
199&97
$30,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Town -wide wastewater` collection and treatment system
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 10
• Land Use Policy Consideration: 3
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 0
• Timing Considerations: -S
• Project Interdependence Considerations: -S
• Lang -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 1
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: -2
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary. Total points - 0
II ACPIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT ( SOURCE AMOUNT II
MRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 133

•
i
0
DEPARTMENT: U-WW Utilities -Wastewater
C.I.P. PROJECT NO.:
1996-97 Rank:
U-WW 97-05
72 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total
Budget
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year S
Years
Estimated
Appropriations
Year 1
Cast
to Date
FY
FY 1997-98
1999-99
FY 1999.00
FY 2000-01
FY 2001-11
1996-97
$6,000,000
1 01
0
0
0
0
0
DESCRIPTION: Outer Banks Beach Club wastewater plant
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 15
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 2
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 0
• Timing Considerations: -5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 0
• Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 1
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: 1
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 14
II Acnv1TY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
MRT%KDH.CIP
VIII — 134

0
•
DEPARTMENT: U-WW Utilities -Wastewater
C.I.P. PROJECT NO.:
1996-97 Rank:
U-W W-97-06
59 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total
Budget
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year S
Years
Estimated
Appropriations
Year I
Cost
to Date
FY
FY 1997-98
1998-99
FY 1999-00
FY 2000-01
FY 2001-11
1996-97
$3,000,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
DESCRIPTION: Ocean Acres wastewater system replacement/refurbishment,
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 20
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 2
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 1
• Timing Considerations: -S
• Project Interdependence Considerations: 0
• Long -Tenn Fiscal Impact Considerations: 1
• Cost Effectiveness Considerations: 1
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points - 20
I ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
MRT%KDH.CIP
VIII — 135

K]
•
DEPARTMENT: U-WW Utilities -Wastewater C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 199&97 Rank:
U-WW-97-07 14 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Removal of point source discharge —land applicatlon system
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 50
• Land Use Policy Considerations: i
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 3
• Timing Considerations: 3
• Project Interdependence Considerations: -2
• Lang -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 1
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 2
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary: Total points — 58
II ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
WRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 136

A
•
DEPARTMENT: U-WW Utilities -Wastewater C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
U-WW-97-08 87 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year I Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-98 1998-99 FY IM-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
199ti-97
$110001000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Wastewater reuse Irrigation system
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
a Service Level Considerations: 10
e Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 1
0 Timing Considerations: -S
0 Project Interdependence Considerations: -S
0 Long -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
0 Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 3
• State or Federal Mandates of Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
e Summary. Total points - S
N ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
MRT\KDH.CIP
VIII — 137

•
L_�
DEPARTMENT: U-WW Utilities -Wastewater C.I.P. PROJECT NO.: 1996-97 Rank:
U-WW-97-09 92 of 101
UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS
Total Budget
Estimated Appropriations Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Years
Cost to Date FY FY 1997-98 1999-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-11
1996-97
$600,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESCRIPTION: Wastewater needs study
I HISTORY:
EVALUATION:
• Service Level Considerations: 10
• Land Use Policy Considerations: 1
• Departmental Goal Considerations: 1
• Timing Considerations: -5
• Project Interdependence Considerations: -5
• Lang -Term Fiscal Impact Considerations: 0
• Cast Effectiveness Considerations: 0
• State or Federal Mandates or Initiative Considerations: 0
• Special Considerations: 0
• Summary. Total points - 2
h ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT I SOURCE AMOUNT II
HRT%ImH.CIP
VIII - 138

IX. RECOMMENDED CAPITAL PROJECTS
The following is a listing of the recommended Capital Projects
is prioritized according to the Capital Project Rating Criteria discussed
in Chapter VI.
40
HNT%VM.CIP IX - I

x
Z]
TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
CAPITAL Improvement PLAN (C.I.P.)
DEPARTMENT CAPITAL NEED/PROJECT LISTING
DEPARTMENT -DIVISION
NEED/PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
C.I.P.
PROJECT NO.
ESTIMATED
COST
POINTS
AWARDED
RANKING OUT
OF 101
Administration (AD)
Annex to Administration Building
AD-97-05
$ 250,000
7
80
AD
Renovate Admin. Building downstairs
AD-97-06
$ 50,000
22
55(Tie)
AD
Beach renourishment
AD-97-08
$ 500,000
57
15(Tie)
AD
Renovate Admin. Building to comply with
American's with Disabilities Act ADA
AD-97-09
$ 50,000
72
6(Tie)
Planning (PLNG)
Computer mapping equipment
IPLNG-97-07
PLNG-97-02
$ 150000
41
1
29(Tie)
PLNG
Renovations to office building
$ 100,000
6
81 Tie
Police Department (PD)
800 MHz trunking radio system
PD-97-01
$ 367,500
34
35(Tie)
PD
Confinement facilities
PD-97-03
$ 500,000
30
43(Tie)
PD
Digitized photo booking and processing
system
PD-97-04
$ 47,000
17
66(Tie)
PD
Fingerprint comparator equipment
PD-97-06
$ 80,000
17
66(Tie)
PD
Mobile command unit and equipment
PD-97-07
$ 75,000
24
53
PD
Police Department building/law
enforcement training center facility
PD-97-09
$1,500,000
21
57(Tie)
PD
Boat and equipment
PD-97-10
$ 35,000
21
57(Tie)
PD
Helicopter
PD-97-16
$ 500,000
1
93
PD
Renovations to Finance and Tax Building
at 1634 N. Croatan Highway
PD-97-17
$ 30,000
45
27(Tie)
Renovations to existing confinement
facilities
IPD-AC-97-03
$ 50,000
12
74(Tie)
Police -Animal Control
PD-AC

w
•
•
Fire (FD)
Pumper truck
FD-97-01
$ 300,000
59
13
FD
Fire station
FD-97-03
$1,000,000
57
15(Tie)
FD
Renovate fire station at 1634 N. Croatan
Highway
FD-97-04
$ 37,410
48
25
FD
Training facility (regional)
FD-97-05
$1,000,000
33
38(Tie)
FD
Renovate public safety/fire department
building at 1634 N. Croatan Highway
FD-97-06
$ 24,875
35
34
FD
Ladder truck
FD-97-09
$ 750,000
38
31(Tie)
FD
Pumper truck
FD-97-10
$ 300,000
38
31 Tie
Fire -Beach Rescue FD-BR
Lifeguard and beach rescue equipment
FD-BR-97-01
$ 87,800 1
31
42
Public Works
Administration (PW-A)
Replace John Deere 850 tractor
PW-A-97-06
$ 25,000
27
48(Tie)
PW-A
Radio system re lace upgrade
PW-A-97-11
$ 25,000
22
55 Tie
Public Works - Public
Buildings (PW-PB)
Bike trail at Hayman Blvd (east -west)
PW- PB-97-30
$ 150,000
34
.35(Tie)
PW-PB
Ground tractor with mowers
PW-PB-97-31
50,000
27
48(Tie)
PW-PB
Storage bldg w/shed for grounds
equipment, pesticides, seed, fertilizer,
office, etc.
PW-PB-97-32
100,000
16
69(Tie)
PW-PB ,
1 ton truck with 12' dump body
PW-PB-97-33
39,000
20
59(Tie)
PW-PB
Multi -use center
PW-PB-97-34
1,500,000
-9
101
PW-PB
Land acquisition
PW-PB-97-35
375,000
30
43(Tie)
.PW-PB
Storm proofing public buildings
PW-PB-97-36
100,000
51
22(Tie)
PW-PB
Shop addition for fleet maintenance
PW-PB-97-37
60,000
74
3(Tie)
PW-PB
Concrete slab for fleet maintenance area
PW-PB-97-38
20,000
63
12
PW-PB
lFront end alignment machine -
IPW-PB-97-39_j
40,000
33
38(Tie)

x
.A
Public Works
Streets/Public Works -
Powell Bill
(PW-S/PW-POB)
Expand storage shed
PW-S-97-01
20,000
54
19(Tie)
PW-S/PW-POB
Single axle dump truck
PW-S-97-06
30,000
41
29(Tie)
PW-S/PW-POB
Mast arm signals
PW-S-97-206
210,000
6
81(Tie)
PW-S/PW-POB
Backhoe (replacement)
PW-S-97-207
45,000
20
59(Tie)
PW-S/PW-POB
Front end loader (replacement)
PW-S-97-208
75,000
20
59(Tie)
PW-S/PW-POB
Motor grader (replacement)
PW-S-97-209
160,000
10
77(Tie)
PW-S/PW-POB
Single axle dump truck (replacement)
PW=S-97-210
90,000
20
59(Tie)
PW-S/PW-POB
Single axle dump truck (new)
PW-S-97-211
90,000
8
79
PW-S/PW-POB
Compaction roller (replacement)
PW-S-97-214
18,000
19.
65
PW-S/PW-POB
Rubber tire excavator (new)
PW-S-97-215
115,000
6
81(Tie)
PW-S/PW-POB
Boom mower tractor (replacement)
PW-S-97-216
40,000
5
87(Tie)
PW-S/PW-POB
Flail mower tractor (replacement)
PW-S-97-217
50,000
5
87(Tie)
PW-S/PW-POB
Broom tractor (replacement)
PW-S-97-218
30,000
3
91
PW-S/PW-POB
Hydroseeder - trailer mounted
PW-S-97-219
15,000
-5
99(Tie)
PW-S/PW-POB
Laser level
PW-S-97-220
15,000
-5
99(Tie)
PW-S/PW-POB
Ditch cleaner - spider
PW-S-97-221
200,000
-2
96(Tie)
PW-S/PW-POB
Slurry seal applicator truck
PW-S-97-222
150,000
-3
98
PW-S/PW-POB
Truck mounted pothole patcher
PW-S-97-223
125,000
-2
96(Tie)
PW-S PW-POB
Water et vacuum truck
PW-S-97-224
225,000
-1
95

X
LrI
ks-Solid Waste
R
Waste collection truck (commercial)
PW-SW-97-01
$ 120,000
51
22(Tie)SW)
SW
Tub grinder with truck and loader
PW-SW-97-06
S 400,000
53
21
PW-SW
Waste collection truck (commercial)
PW-SW-97-07
$ 120,000
46
26
PW-SW
Recycling truck (curb -side)
PW-SW-97-08
$ 85,000
16
69(Tie)
PW-SW
Recycling truck (curb -side)
PW-SW-97-09
$ 85,000
.16
69(Tie)
PW-SW
Boom truck
PW-SW-97-10
$ 70,000
27
48(Tie)
PW-SW
Roll off truck
PW-SW-97-11
$ 80,000
17
66(Tie)
PW-SW
Open building
PW-SW-97-12
$ 120,000
49
24
PW-SW
Recycling trucks (curb -side)
PW-SW-97-13
$ 85,000
11
76
PW-SW
500 gallon recycling containers (5)
PW-SW-97-14
$ 33,000
6
81(Tie)
PW-SW
40 yard roll off replacements (10)
PW-SW-97-15
$ 35,000
6
81(Tie)
PW-SW
Paving of back lot and drainage
improvements
PW-SW-97-16
$ 50,000
69
10
PW-SW
Water purifying system for wash -out pit
PW-SW-97-17
S 45,000
45
27(Tie)
PW-SW
Beach comber refuse truck for beach
trash barrel pick up
PW-SW-97-18
$ 70,000
23
54
PW-SW
Waste collection truck (residential)
PW-SW-97-19
$ 140,000
57
IS(Tie)
PW-SW
lWaste collection truck residential
PW-SW-97-20
$ 140,000
1 57
1 15 Tie
Utilities - Water
Administration
(U-WA)
Building repairs (roof, siding, etc)
U-WA-97-04
$ 50,000
34
35(Tie)
U-WA
Renovate building to meet American's
with Disabilities Act (ADA) Standards
U-WA-97-05
$ 25,000
72
6(Tie)
U-WA
Office building (new)
U-WA-97-06
$ 350,000
10
77(Tie)
U-WA
Meter reading equipment (microprocessing
system
U-WA-97-07
$ 500,000
5
87(Tie)

X
a,
i
i
i
Utilities - Water Plant
(U-WP)
Repair or replace #3 high service pump
U-WP-97-02
$ 50,000
74
3(Tie)
U-WP
Water level indicators
U-WP-97-03
$ 50,000
65
11
U-WP
Computer system for telemetry
U-WP-97-11
$ 30,000
20
59(Tie)
U-WP
Water tower painting
U-WP-97-12
$ 235,000
54
19(Tie)
U-WP
Water tank construction in north end
KOH
U-WP-97-16
$ 850,000
13
73
U-WP
Replace 60 hp pump motors
U-WP-97-17
$ 100,000
38
31(Tie)
U-WP
Replace 100 Town Hall Pump Station
pump motors
U-WP-97-18
$ 50,000
33
38(Tie)
U-WP
Building maintenance
IU-WP-97-20
U-WP-97-19
is
$ 150,000 j
26
51(Tie)
U-WP
Upgrade SCADA systems
100,000
12
14 Tie
Utilities - Water System
(U-WS)
One -ton truck (service truck fully
equipped)
U-WS-97-02
$ 30,000
72
6(Tie)
U-WS
Back hoe
U-WS-97-10
$ 40,000
26
51(Tie)
U-WS
Install 65 meters annually
U-WS-97-12
$ 30,000
76
2
U-WS
8th Street maintenance building
U-WS-97-13
$ 75,000
29
46(Tie)
U-WS
.
Meters for emergency connection to
Dare County and Nags Head
U-WS-97-14
$ 80,000
73
5
U-WS
Locating equipment for polyvinyl
chloride (PVC) and asbestos cement
(AC) pipe
U-WS-97-15
$ 30,000
6
81(Tie)
U-WS
Replace all asbestos cement water
lines (per EPA)
U-WS-97-16
$ 7,000,000
70
9
U-WS
Replace all main line valves
U-WS-97-17
$ 900,000
29
46(Tie)
U-WS
Replace all hydrants
U-WS-97-18
$ 1,000,000
30
43(Tie)
U-WS
Water line size upgrades to 6" minimum
U-WS-97-19
$ 1,110,000
33
38(Tie)

x
V
0 •
•
Utilities -Wastewater
Wastewater treatment plant
U-WW-97-01
$ 808,000
77
1
(U-WW)
improvements, pump station
improvements, ancillary improvements
U-WW
Town -wide wastewater collection and
U-WW-97-04
$30,000,000
0
94
treatment system
U-WW
Outer Banks Beach Club wastewater
U-WW-97-05
$ 6,000,000
14
72
plant
U-WW
Ocean Acres wastewater system
U-WW-97-06
$ 3,000,000
20
59(Tie)
replacement/refurbish
U-WW
Removal of point source discharge--
U-WW-97-07
$ 500,000
58
14
land application system
U-WW
Wastewater reuse irrigation system
U-WW-97-08
$ 1,000,000
5
1
87(Tie)
U-WW
lWastewater needs study
U-WW-97-09
$ .600,000
2
1 92

X. FISCAL IMPACT OF RECOMMENDED PROJECTS
• EXHIBIT 13, which follows, charts the fiscal impact (Financial
Implications) of the one hundred one (101) recommended projects.
0
C�
WRT%KDH.CIP
X-1

M
N
i +C-is 991
TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN, 1997
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
SOURCE: Town of Kill Devil Hills, North Carolina
Capital Improvement Plan Committee

FINANCIAL SUMMARY OF 101 CIP PROJECTS
GENERAL FUND
ADMINISTRATION 7850
PLANNING 115
POLICE 3184
FIRE 3500
PUBLIC BLDGS 2484
STREETS 1703
SOLID WASTE 1678
SUB -TOTAL 20514
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
WATER ADMIN 925
WATER PLANT 1615
WATER SYS 10295
WASTEWATER 41908
SUB -TOTAL 54743
TOTAL 75257
($ 000,S)
SOURCE: Town of Kill Devil Hills, North Carolina
Capital Improvement Plan Committee

• •.
12 PROJECTS REQUIRING $1 MIL OR MORE
GENERAL FUND
BEACH NOURISH'T
POLICE BLDG
MULTI -USE CTR
FIRE STATION
FIRE TRNG CTR
SUB -TOTAL
`ENTRERPRISE FUNDS
7500 SEWER 30000
1500 WATERLINES 7000
1500 BEACH CLUB 6000
1000 OCEAN ACRES 3000
1000 UPGRADE W L 1110
REPLACE F H 1000
W/W REUSE 1000
12500 SUB -TOTAL 49110
TOTAL 61610
($ 000°s)
SOURCE: Town of Kill Devil Hills, North Carolina
Capital Improvement Plan Committee

0
•
BIPLICATIONS
• CIP GENERAL FUND RQMT PRESENT VALUE= $20,514,000.
• ASSUMING 2.5% INFLATION, LEVEL FUNDING REQUIRE—
MENT — $1,60,000 PER YEAR THROUGH YEAR 2011.
• TOTAL "THEN YEAR" REQUIREMENT IS $24,853,000.
• "THEN YEAR" AD VALOREM RATE EQUIVALENT—
.18.
io
CIP ENTERPRISE FUNDS RQMT = $54,743,000,
• "THEN YEAR" RQMT IS $66,322,000, EQUIVQALENT TO
$14,10 PER CURRENT WATER CUSTOMER.
SOURCE: Town of Kill Devil Hills, North Carolina``
Capital Improvement Plan Committee

SUGGESTED CIP ALGORITHMS
GENERAL FUND CIP PROJECTS:
.f
EACH $1 MILLION CIP GENERAL FUND PROJECTS
APPROVED AND EXECUTED WILL REQUIRE ADDITIONAL
RESOURCES (OVER 15 YEARS) EQUIVALENT TO - $ .01 AD
VAL�EM .
ENTERPRISE FUNDS CIP PROJECTS:
EACH $1 MILLION -OF CIP ENTERPRISE FUNDS PROJECTS
APPROVED AND EXECUTED WILL REQUIRE ADDITIONAL
RESOURCES (OVER 15 YEARS) EQUIVALENT TO - $200 PER
EXISTING CUSTOMER.
SOURCE: Town of Kill Devil Hills, North Carolina
Capital Improvement Plan Committee

XI. REVENUE GENERATING ALTERNATIVES
A. Introduction
The Town currently budgets for certain capital improvements
annually, most of which are funded through ad valorem taxes and
anticipated grants and gifts. The following section discuss these
and other revenue generating alternatives available to the Town
for funding the capital projects contained in this plan.
B. Gifts, Endowments, and Donations
The Town has, and may continue to receive gifts, endowments,
and/or donations. However, it is felt that gifts, endowments,
and/or donations that may occur will not in and of themselves,
produce the revenues necessary for any of the capital improvements
contained in this plan.
C. Dare County Tourist Bureau
The Dare County Tourist Bureau funds beach access improvements on
a 50/50 basis with the Town. The Town has been very successful in
working with the Tourist Bureau in this regard. It is likely that
future funding from the Tourist Bureau will continue, although it
will be limited to beach access improvement activities on a cost
• sharing basis.
D. Intergovernmental Agreements
With respect to certain purchases -- particularly the purchase of
a tub grinder -- the Town should pursue intergovernmental
agreements and cost sharing arrangements for such facilities,
services, and equipment.
E. Federal and State Grants and Loans
0
F.
WRT\19H.CIP
The Town has been successful in receiving Federal and State grants
and loans, particularly for land use planning, stormwater
management, and hazard mitigation. The Town should pursue,
whenever possible, grants and loans from"Federal and State
agencies for capital projects. For example, the construction of a
fire station could be funded, at least in part, with Federal
funds. The Town has made inquiries to the United States
Department of Agriculture's Rural Economic and Community
Development Agency in this regard.
Public -Private Partnerships
a
The Town should pursue public -private partnerships wherein private
agencies design, build, and may, in some cases, operate facilities
to meet the needs that have been identified through the capital
improvement planning process.
XI - I

• G.
Special Assessment/Revenue Sharing
Given that many of the capital projects that have been identified
are for specific areas of Town, it may be that the Town will opt
to conduct special assessments or ask for revenue sharing
agreements with public agencies to help accomplish joint or mutual
goals by providing capital projects and services.
H.
Facility or Impact Fees
t
The Town may seek to adopt an ordinance allowing the collection of
�1
facility fees or impact fees. Such fees could be imposed at
building permit issuance and calculated based upon the costs of
facilities in proportion to development creating the need for such
facilities. Impact fees shift a portion of the burden of the cost
of new or expanded facilities to accommodate new development away
from the community at large, to new development itself. Facility
or impact fees aim to require new development to account for its
fiscal impact on the community by accounting for its proportionate
share of the cost of new or expanded capital facilities.
\l
b tk
I.
User Fees
The Town may institute a system of user fees wherein users of
facilities and/or services are charged for using these facilities.
This revenue generating alternative could be particularly
applicable to recreation related facilities that are constructed
•
or that have been requested through the capital improvements
planning process.
J.
Leasing
Currently, the Town leases many of the vehicles in its service
fleet. Typically, larger apparatus and equipment are purchased
outright. Leasing of vehicles, equipment, and facilities could be
an option to the Town that would provide for some of the capital
projects that have been identified in the capital improvement
planning process, but for which there are insufficient funds or no
identifiable revenue generated alternative.
K. Bonds
The Town may have to issue bonds to construct capital facilities
that have been identified. Particularly, if the decision is made
to provide public sewer to each structure in Kill Devil Hills,
bonds would most likely be the funding source.
L. Ad Valorem Taxes
The Town, as its last option, could raise taxes to meet its
capital budgeting needs.
0 MRT\MH.CIP XI - 2

DRA ,o. �.
C�
XII. CONCLUSION
This section will be completed prior to submission of final Capital
Improvement Plan to Town of Kill Devil Hills Planning Board and Board of
Commissioners for their review. Conclusions will be drawn from the
recommendations of project priority made by the Ad Hoc Capital
Improvement Plan Committee with respect to fiscal impact of same on the
Town of Kill Devil Hills.
YRT\KDH.CIP

•
SOURCES CONSULTED
•
WRT%KD+.cty

SOURCES CONSULTED
Local Resources
Mrs. Debora Diaz, Town Manager
Town of Kill Devil Hills
P.O. Box 1719
102 Town Hall Drive
Kill Devil Hills, NC 27948
[phone]
Mrs Teresa Pickrel, Director
Tax and Finance Department
Town of Kill Devil Hills
1634 N. Croatan Highway
Kill Devil Hills, NC 27948
[phone]
Mr. William G. Loy, Director
Planning Department
Town of Kill Devil Hills
1634 N. Croatan Highway
Kill Devil Hills, NC 27948
[phone]
Mr. Charles Smith, Director
Public Works Department
Town of Kill Devil Hills
P.O. Box 1719
701 W. Ocean Bay Blvd.
Kill Devil Hills, NC 27948
[phone]
Mr. Darrell Merrell, Director
Utiltiies Department
Town of Kill Devil Hills
107 Town Hall Drive
Kill Devil Hills, NC 27948
[phone]
Mr. Randy Metzger, Assistant
Director
Utilties Department
Town of Kill Devil Hills
107 Town Hall Drive
Kill Devil Hills, NC 27948
[phone]
Major Michael Harris,
• Acting Chief
Mr. Jerry E. Allen, Director
Police Department
Parks and Recreation
Town of Kill Devil Hills
Department
1634 N. Croatan Highway
Dare County
Kill Devil Hills, NC 27948
1029 Driftwood Drive
[phone]
P.O. Box 1000
Manteo, North Carolina 27954
Chief Doug Penland
[phone]
Fire Department
Town of Kill Devil Hills
1634 N. Croatan Highway
Kill Devil Hills, NC 27948
[phone]
State Resource
Mr. John A. Thayer, Jr. A.I.C.P.
District Planner
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
1367 U.S. 17 South
Elizabeth City, N. C. 27909
• [phone]
WRT%KDH.CIP

Written Resources
1993 Town of Kill Devil Hills Land Use Plan Update
The Practice of Local Government Planning by the International City
Management Association
A Practitioner's Guide to Development Impact Fees by James C. Nicholes,
Arthur C. Nelson, and Julian C. Juergensmeyer
Other Written Resources
During the development of the Tonw of Kill Devil Hill's Capital
Improvements Plan, the capital improvements planning docuements for many North
Carolina localities were reviewed and analyzed. Localities contributing
C.I.P.s include Carboro, North Carolina; Hillsboro, North Carolina;
Smithfield, North Carolina; Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Nags Head, North
Carolina; Wake Forest, North Carolina; Greenville, North Carolina; and
Greensboro, North Carolina.
WRT%KOH.CIP

•
VRT\KDH.CIP
APPENDICES

r -1
L-A
APPENDIX 1
Capital Improvements Plan
Summary of Public Meetings
The following is a summary of events and public meetings relative to the development of the
Capital Improvements Plan:
Bold --on Planning Board Agenda
*-- Discussed by the Planning Board, not on Agenda
**--on Board of Commissioners Agenda
August 1995
Received grant for the CIP. ,
**October 9,1996
NC-DEHNR - Capital Improvements Plan Grant Funding resolution
October 179 1995
Review of draft Request for proposal of Capital Improvements Plan.
November 25, 1995
Advertisement in the newspaper for a consultant
January 4, 1996
Capital Improvements Plan proposal for a study which will result in Capital Improvements
Plan recommending Overman and Associates for this study based on past experience with
town. Request to hire Overman And Associates For the CIP.
**January 30, 1996
Discused grant information and selection of the consultant for the Capital Improvements
Plan. Overman and Associates were selected.
February 6, 1996
Announced that the Board of Commissioners approved Overman and Associates as a
consultant for Capital Improvements Plan
February 26, 1996
Entered into sub -contract with Overman and Associates
March 5, 1996
• ? Review practice of local government planning
Al-1

0
Page 2:
*July 15, 1996
First meeting of the Capital Improvements Committee.
August 6, 1996
Capital Improvements Progress report (Schedule Public hearing on the 20th)
*August 7, 1996
Discussion rating criteria. Discussion of revised Capital Need/Project history, population and
growth forecast including building trends.
August 20, 1996
Public Hearing to receive public comment on capital expenditures for the Town of Kill Devil
Hills for the next 15 years
October 1, 1996
Agenda discussion for a joint Workshop of the Planning Board, Board of Commissioners and
the Capital Improvements Committee. Purpose of the meeting to report findings of the
Capital Improvement Committee.
**November 7, 1996--Vision 2010
Joint meeting of the Planning Board, Board of Commissioners and Capital Improvements
Committee to introduce to the public the new Capital Improvements Plan.
Al - 2

APPENDIX 2
TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (C.I.P.) '
DEPARTMENT CAPITAL NEED/PROJECT LISTING
FUNDS EARMARKED FOR FUTURE YEARS' PROJECTS
DEPARTMENT -DIVISION
NEED/PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
C.I.P.
PROJECT NO.
ESTIMATED
COST
FUNDS BUDGETED
TO DATE
'97 - '98
'98 - '99
199 - 100
Public Works Streets/Public
Works - Powell Bill
(PW-S/PW-POB)
Lee Street
PW-S-97-07
•`5119,000
$119,000
--
--
--
PW-S/PW-POB
Ninth Ave
PW-S-97-08
66,850
66,850
--
PW-S/PW-POB
Airstrip Road
PW-S-97-09
25,200
25,200
--
--
--
PW-S/PW-POB
Tenth Ave
PW-S-97-10
93,800
93,800
--
--
PW-S/PW-POB
W. Corrigan Street
PW-S-97-11
157,500
157,500
--
--
PW-S/PW-POB
W. Baum Street
PW-S-97-12
126,000
126,000
--
PW-S/PW-POB
E. Third Street
PW-S-97-13
67,900
67,900
--
--
PW-S/PW-POB
W. Sothpl Street
PN-S-97-14
COMPLETED
--
--
--
PW-S/PW-POB
E. Sothel Street
PW-S-97-15
17,500
17,500
--
--
--
PW-S/PW-POB
Raymond Ave
PW-S-97-16
IPW-S-97-17
99,750
45,250
54,500
--
--
PW-S/PW-POB.
E. Wilkinson Street
COMPLETED
--
--
--
PW-S/PN-POB
E. Walker Street
PW-S-97-18
59,500
--
59,500
--
--
PW-S/PN-POB
E. Bickett Street
PW-S-97-19
59,500
--
59,500
--
--
PW-S/PN-POB
W. Walker Street
PN-S-97-20
105,000
--
105,000
--
--
PW-S/PW-POB
Second Street
PW-S-97-21
67,550
--
67,500
--
Pit S PW-POB
E. Landim Drive
PW-S-97-22
68,600
--
68,600
--
$74-9-,000 budgeted for '96-'97
r $725,000 forecasted for 197-'98
*A* $728,000 forecasted for 198-'99
*m*$731,000 forecasted for 199-100
"nmLor
A2-1

TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (C.I.P.)
DEPARTMENT CAPITAL NEED/PROJECT LISTING
FUNDS EARMARKED FOR FUTURE YEARS' PROJECTS
DEPARTMENT -DIVISION
NEED/PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
C.I.P.
PROJECT NO.
ESTIMATED
COST
FUNDS BUDGETED
TO DATE *
'97 - '98
'98 - 999
t
999 - 900
Public Works Streets/Public
Works - Powell Bill
(PW-S/PW-POB)
Ashville Dr
PW-S-97-23
` S f8,600
--
$68,600
--
--
PW-S/PW-POB
E. Wright Ave
PW-S-97-24
67,200
679200
PW-S/PW-POB
W. Wright Ave
PW-S-97-25
29,400
29,400
--
PW-S/PW-POB
E. Oregon Ave
PW-S-97-26
679200
--
67,200
--
PINS/PW-POB
E. Eden Street
PW-S-97-27
35,000
--
35,000
PENS/PW-POB
E. Meadowlark Street
PW-S-97-28
40,250
--
40,250
PW-S/PW-POB
W. Meadowlark Street
PW-S-97-29
29,400
--
2,750
$26,650
PW-S/PW-POB
E. Carlton Ave
PW-S-97-30
19,250
--
19,250
PW-S/PW-POB
E. St. Clair Street
PW-S-97-31
40,250
--
40,250
PW-S/PW-POB
E. Fresh Pond Drive
PW-S-97-32
76,300
--
$76,300
PW-S/PW408
W Fresh Pond Drive
PW-S-97-33
115,500
$115,500
PW-S/PW-POEM
W. Lake Drive
PW-S-97-34
116,900
--
$116,900
PW-S/PW-POB
E. Aviation Ave
PW-S-97-35
19,250
--
--
$19,250
PW-S/PW-POB
Carlow Ave
PW-S-97-36
17,500
--
$17,500
PW-S/PW-POB
Sioux Street
PW-S-97-37
IPW-S-97-38
2,100
--
$2,100
PW-S PW-POB
DollZ Street
39.,900
--
$39 000
*$719,000 budgetedor 96- 9
$M,000 forecasted for 197-'98
+drr $728,000 forecasted for 198-'99
$731,000 forecasted for '99-'00
%W%=.or
A2-2

0 0 0
TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (C.I.P.)
DEPARTMENT CAPITAL NEED/PROJECT LISTING
FUNDS EARMARKED FOR FUTURE YEARS' PROJECTS
DEPARTMENT -DIVISION
NEED/PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
C.I.P.
PROJECT NO.
ESTIMATED
COST
FUNDS BUDGETED
TO DATE
'97 - '98
Mr
'98 - '99
t
199 - 100
tt
Public Works Streets/Public
lWorks - Powell Bill
(PW-S/PW-POB)
W. Palmetto Street
PW-S-97-39
` $71,750
--
'
--
$71,750
PW-S/PW-POB
W. Aycock Street
PW-S-97-40
80,500
--
80,500
PW-S/PW-POB
W. Archdale Street
PW-S-97-41
101,500
--
--
101,500
MI-S/PW-POB
E. Archdale Street
PW-S-97-42
64,050
--
-
1,550
$62,500
PW-S/PW-PO8
Canal Drive
PW-S-97-43
325,500
--
--
$297,000
PW-S/PW-POB
Village Lane
PW-S-97-44
136,500
--
--
136,500
PW-S/PW-POB
Tern Court
PW-S-97-45
43,400
--
--
43,400
PW-S/PW-POB
Princess Ann Drive
PW-S-97-46
IPW-S-97-48
114,100
--
--
114,100
PW-S/PW-POB
Salem Ave
PW-S-97-47
43,750
--
--
--
43,750
PW-S/PW-POB
Lowell Ave
43,650
--
--
--
33,750
PW-S/PW-POB
Veelee Drive
PW-S-97-49
84,000
--
--
PW-S/PW-PO§
Park Drive
PW-S-97-50
35,000
PW-S/PW-POB
W. Atlantic Street
PW-S-97-51
115,150
PW-S/PW-POB
Baker Ave
PW-S-97-52
14,000
PW-S/PW-PO8
Ferris Ave
PW-S-97-53
67,900
PW-S PW-POB
Porthole Court
PW-S-97-54
47,950
* $719,000 budgeted for 196-197
+ $725,000 forecasted for 197-'98
+►+t $728,000 forecasted for '98-'99
***k $731,000 forecasted for,199-'00
wmlm vp
A2-3

9 ••
TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (C.I.P.)
DEPARTMENT CAPITAL NEED/PROJECT LISTING
FUNDS EARMARKED FOR FUTURE YEARS' PROJECTS
DEPARTMENT -DIVISION
NEED/PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
C.I.P.
PROJECT NO.
ESTIMATED
COST
FUNDS BUDGETED
TO DATE *
'97 - '98
'98 - '99
t
199 - 100
,► ,�
Public Works Streets/Public
Works - Powell Bill
(PW-S/PN-POB)
E. Choxan Street
PW-S-97-55
$ 59,500
PW-S/PW-POB
Corral Court
PW-S-97-56
9,800
PW-S/PW-POB
Random Street
PW-S-97-57
39,900
PW-S/PW-POB
David Lane
PW-S-97-58
13,300
PW-S/PW-POB
Fil Lane
PW-S-97-59
15,050
PW-S/PW-POB
Peter Lane
PW-S-97-60
13,300
PW-S/PW-POB
Laura Lane
PW-S-97-61
15,050
PW-S/PW-POB
Martone Lane
PW-S-97-62
15,050
PW-S/PW-POB
Frances Lane
PW-S-97-63
15,050
PW-S/PW-POB
Console Lane
PW-S-97-64
15,050
PW-S/PW-POB
Alexander Lane
PW-S-97-65
15,050
PW-S/PW-P0d
Charlotte Lane
PW-S-97-66
15,050
PW-S/PW-POB
Helen Lane
PN-S-97-67
13,650
PW-S/PW-POB
Dock Street
PW-S-97-68
17,500
PW-S/PW-POB
Evans Place
PW-S-97-69
11,900
PW-S PW-P0B
McCabe Place
PW-S-97-70
19 950
* $719,000 budgeted for '95-'97
$725,000 forecasted for 197-'98
r $728,000 forecasted for '98-'99
$731,000 forecasted for '99-'00
W"%Wt.o,
A2-4

TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (C.I.P.)
DEPARTMENT CAPITAL NEED/PROJECT LISTING
FUNDS EARMARKED FOR FUTURE YEARS' PROJECTS
DEPARTMENT -DIVISION
NEED/PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
C.I.P.
PROJECT NO.
ESTIMATED
,COST
FUNDS BUDGETED
TO DATE *
'97 - '98
t
'98 - '99
irkir
'99 - '00
r
Public Works Streets/Public
Works - Powell Bill
(PW-S/PW--POB)
Glider Court
PW-S-97-71
$ 19,950
PW-S/PW-POB
Froelich Place
PW-S-97-72
16,800
PW-S/PW-POB
Remele Place
PW-S-97-73
25,200
PW-S/PW-POB
Loblolly Court
PW-S-97-74
17,150
PW-S/PN-POB
W. Aviation Ave
PW-S-97-75
29,400
PW-S/PW-POB
Jones Court
PW-S-97-76
13,650
PW-S/PW-POB
Sea Village Lane
PW-S-97-77
34,650
PW-S/PW-POB
Sea Wing Court
PW-S-97-78
8,050
PW-S/PW-POB.
Upper Dune Drive
PW-S-97-79
59,500
PW-S/PN-POB
Monument Lane
PW-S-97-80
47,600
PW-S/PW-POB
Windsong Nay
PW-S-97=81
IPW-S-97-83
24,500
PW-S/PN-006
W. Clark Street
PW-S-97-82
126,000
PW-S/PN-POB
Sixth Ave
59,500
PW-S/PW-POB
Seventh Ave
PW-S-97-84
52,500
PW-S/PW-POB
Eighth Ave
PW-S-97-85
52,500
PW-S PW-POB
Pine Needle Court
PW-S-97-86
13,650
*s719,000 budgetedor 196- 97
i►ir $725,000 forecasted for 197-198
*At $728,000 forecasted for 190-199
*A** $731,000 forecasted for '99-'00
VMM.a
A2-5

TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (C.I.P.)
DEPARTMENT CAPITAL NEED/PROJECT LISTING
FUNDS EARMARKED FOR FUTURE YEARS' PROJECTS
DEPARTMENT -DIVISION
NEED/PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
C.I.P.
PROJECT NO.
ESTIMATED
COST
FUNDS BUDGETED
TO DATE
'97 - '98
'98 - '99
'99 - 100
Public Works Streets/Public
Works - Pmmll Bill
(PW-S/PW-POB)
Pond Street
PW-S-97-87
` $ 18,800
PN-S/PW-POB
Orville Court
PW-S-97-88
18,550
PW=S/PW--PO8
Wilbur Court
PW-S-97-89
15,050
PW-S/PN-POB
Mitchell Court
PW-S-97-90
18,550
PW-S/PM-POB
Armstrong Court
PW-S-97-91
15,050
•PW-S/PW-POB
Kelly Court
PW-S-97-92
18,550
PN-S/PW-POB
Kitty Court
PN-S-97-93
15,050
PW-S/PH-POB
E. Helga Street
PW-S-97-94
65,800
PW-S/PW-POB
Sharon Court
PN-S-97-95
15,050
PN-S/PW-POB
Lisa Court
PW-S-97-96
15,050
PW-S/PN-POB
Jeffrey Court
PW-S-97-97
15,050
PW-S/PN-QOB
Franklin Street
PW-S-97-98
84,300
PW-S/PW-POB
Pine Grove Terrace
PW-S-97-99
121,100
PW-S/PW-POB
Pine Cone Court
PW-S-97-100
13,650
PW-S/PW--POB
Heather Lane
PW-S-97-101
30,800
PM-S PW-POB
JW. Eighth Street
PW-S-97-102
71,050
* $719,000 budgeted for '95-191
$725,000 forecasted for 197-'98
t $728,000 forecasted for 198-'99
,t $731,000 forecasted for '92-'00
wmam.o►
A2-6

0
TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (C.I.P.)
DEPARTMENT CAPITAL NEED/PROJECT LISTING
E
FUNDS EARMARKED FOR FUTURE YEARS' PROJECTS
DEPARTMENT -DIVISION
NEED/PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
C.I.P.
PROJECT NO.
ESTIMATED
COST
FUNDS BUDGETED
TO DATE *
'97 - '98
'98 - '99
dint
199 - 100
yHHNt
Public Works Streets/Public
Works - Poxell Bill
(PW-S/PW-POB)
W. Carlton Ave
PW-S-97-103
$ 29,400
'
PN-S/PN-P06
M. Oregon Ave
PM-S-97-104
29,400
PINS/PN-POB
Mustain Street
PW-S-97-105
98,000
PW-S/PW-POB
Pinehurst Ave
PW-S-97-106
17,500
PW-S/PW-POB
Woodmere Ave
PN-S-97-107
5,600
PW-S/PW-POB
W. Landing Drive
PW-S-97-108
269,500
PW-S/PN-POB
Pirates Loops
PW-S-97-109
46,550
PW-S/PN-POB
Seagull Court
PW-S-97-110
5,950
PW-S/PN-POB
Schooner Court
PW-S-97-111
18,900
PW-S/Pw POB
Live Oak Court
PW-S-97-112
48,650
PN-S/PW-POB '.
First Flight Lane
PW-S-97-113
77,000
PW-S/PHPOB
Wax Myrtle Court
PW-S-97-114
19,950
PW-S/PW-POB
Cooke Place
PW-S-97-115
22,400
P11-S/PW-POB
Small Place
PW-S-97-116
11,900
PN-S/PN-POB
Telegraph Court
PN-S-97-117
31,150
PW-S PN-POB
Harbour Court
PW-S-97-118
52,500
* $719,000 budgeted for 196-'97
$725,000 forecasted for 197-'98
•ft $728,000 forecasted for 198-'99
+tit $731,000 forecasted for•199-'00
wMm".or
A2-7

TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (C.I.P.)
DEPARTMENT CAPITAL NEED/PROJECT LISTING
i
FUNDS EARMARKED FOR FUTURE YEARS' PROJECTS
DEPARTMENT -DIVISION
NEED/PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
C.I.P.
PROJECT NO.
ESTIMATED
COST
FUNDS BUDGETED
TO DATE
'97 - '98
'98 - '99
199 - 100
Public Works Streets/Public
Works - Powell Bill
(PW-S/PW-POB)
Coral Drive
PW-S-97-119
;$ 22,400
PW-S/PW-POB
Camilla Drive
PW-S-97-120
42,000
PW=S/PW-POB
Sir Walter Road
PW-S-97-121
134,400
PW-S/PW-POB
Yardarm Lane
PW-S-97-122
27,400
PW-S/PW-POB
Town Hall Drive
PW-S-97-123
81,200
PW-S/PW-POB
Ocean Park Circle
PW-S-97-124
87,500
PW-S/PW-POB
W. Hayman Blvd
PW-S-97-125
152,250
PW-S/PW-POB
W. Wilkinson Street
PW-S-97-126
176,750
-
PW-S/PW-POB
E. Ocean Acres Drive
PW-S-97-127
71,050
PW-S/PW-POB
Columbia Ave
PW-S-97-128
129,500
PW-S/PW-POB
Shiloh Street
PW-S-97-129
76,300
PW-S/PW-POB
Jean Court
PW-S-97-130
18,900
PW-SIN-POB
Prospect Ave
PW-S-97-131
67,900
PW-S/PW-POB
Briggs Street
PW-S-97-132
77,000
PW-S/PW-POB
W. Sportsman Drive ,
PW-S-97-133
208,250
PW-S PW-POB
W. Helga
PW-S-97-134
137,550
* $719,000 budgeted for 195-'97
*k $n5,000 forecasted for '97-'98
t 5728,000 forecasted for 198-'99
lr $731,000 forecasted for 199-'00
YMON.w
A2-8

0. •
TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (C.I.P.)
DEPARTMENT CAPITAL NEED/PROJECT LISTING
FUNDS EARMARKED FOR FUTURE YEARS' PROJECTS
DEPARTMENT -DIVISION
NEED/PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
C.I.P.
PROJECT NO.
ESTIMATED
COST
FUNDS BUDGETED
TO DATE
'97 - '98
'98 - '99
199 - 100
Public Works Streets/Public
Works - Poxell Bill
(PW-S/PN-POB)
E. Durham Street
PW-S-97-135
` $ 46,550•
PW-S/PN-POB
St. Louis Street
PW-S-97-136
96,950
PW-S/PW-POB
E. Archdale Street
PW-S-97-137
59,500
PW-S/PW-POB
Seminole Street
PW-S-97-138
2,100
PW-S/PW-POB
W. Ocean Acres Drive
PW-S-97-139
140,000
PW-S/PW-POB
Cameron Street
PW-S-97-140
126,980
PW-S/PW-POB
Wrightsville Blvd
PW-S-97-141
3,500
PW-S/PW-POB
Ketch Lane
PW-S-97-142
154,000
PW-S/PW-POB
Quail Lane
PW-S-97-143
203,000
PW-S/PM-POB
Burns Drive
PW-S-97-144
260.050
PW-S/PW-POB
Bell Ave
PW-S-97-145
3,500
PW-S/PN-POB
Gunas Drive
PW-S-97-146
118,300
PW-S/PW-POB
Harrington Ave
PW-S-97-147
84,700
PW-S/PW-POB
Copley Drive
PW-S-97-148
69,300
PW-S/PW-POB
E. Dean Street
PW-S-97-149
15,750
PW-S PW-POB
IParkwood Drive
PW-S-97-150
95,900
* $719,000 budgeted for 196-197
$725,000 forecasted for 197-'98
t $728,000 forecasted for 198-'99
*k*ot $731,000 forecasted for•199-100
w"%p,.a
A2-9

TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (C.I.P.)
DEPARTMENT CAPITAL NEED/PROJECT LISTING
FUNDS EARMARKED FOR FUTURE YEARS' PROJECTS
DEPARTMENT-0IVISION
NEED/PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
C.I.P.
PROJECT NO.
ESTIMATED
COST
FUNDS BUDGETED
TO DATE
'97 - '98
'98 - '99
'99 - 100
Public Works Streets/Public
Works - Powell Bill
(PW-S/PW-POB)
Maple Court
PW-S-97-151
' $ 17,150
-
PW-S/PW-POB
N(yrtle Court
PW-S-97-152
17,150
PW-S/PW-POB
Elm Court
PW-S-97-153
17,150
PW-S/PW-POB
Teakwood Lane
PW-S-97-154
23,800
PW-S/PW-POB
Clipper Court
PW-S-97-155
8,400
PW-S/PW-POB
Captains Circle
PW-S-97-156
14,000
PW-S/PW-POB
Sealoft Court
PW-S-97-157•
11,900
PW-S/PW-POB
Captains Lane
PW-S-97-158
60,550
PW-S/PW-POB
Anchor Court
PW-S-97-159
8,400
PW-S/PW-POB
Dogwood Lane
PW-S-97-160
69,300
.PW-S/PW-POB
Harpoon Drive
PW-S-97-161
17,150
PW-S/PW-PO8
Nixonton Street
PW-S-97-162
65,800
PW-S/PW-POB
W. 1st Street
PW-S-97-163
339,010
PW-S/PW-POB
Bath Street
PW-S-97-164
134,750
PW-S/PW-POB
W. St. Clair Street.
PW-S-97-165
29,400
PW-S PW-POB
Mau Hill Court
PW-S-97-166
18,900
* $719,000 budgeted for 196-997
+►k $725,000 forecasted for 197-'98
+► $728,000 forecasted for '98-'99
,t $731,000 forecasted for 199-100
,new A2 - 10

TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (C.I.P.)
DEPARTMENT CAPITAL NEED/PROJECT LISTING
FUNDS EARMARKED FOR FUTURE YEARS' PROJECTS
DEPARTMENT -DIVISION
NEED/PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
C.I.P.
PROJECT NO.
ESTIMATED
COST
FUNDS BUDGETED
TO DATE
'97 - '98
'98 - '99
199 - 900
Public Works Streets/Public
Works - Powell Bill
(PW-S/PW-POB)
Truxton Street
PW-S-97-167
k $106,400
PINS/PW-POB
Wallace Street
PW-S-97-168
96,950
PW-S/PW--POB
Susan Drive
PW-S-97-169
61,950
PW-S/PW-POB
E. Holly Street
PW-S-97-170
38,500
PINS/PW-POB
New Bern Street
PW-S-97-171
112,000
PW-S/PW-POB
Elizabeth City Street
PW-S-97-172
103,600
PW-S/PW-POB
W. Avalon Drive
PW-S-97-173
211,750
PW-S/PW-POB
W. Durham Street
PW-S-97-174
214,550
PW-S/PW-POB
Edenton Street
PW-S-97-175
98,000
PW-S/PW-POB
Aztec
PW-S-97-176
42,000
PW-S/PW-POB
E. Martin Street
PW-S-97-177
64,050
PN-S/PM-p06
E. Corrigan Street
PW-S-97-178
216,650
PW-S/PW-POB
Carolyn Drive
PW-S-97-179
42,000
PW-S/PW-POB
E. Goodard Ave
PW4-97-180
77,000
PW-S/PW-POB
Raleigh Ave
PW-S-97-181
36,050
PW-S PW-POB
Ta a Drive
PW-S-97-182
67,900
* $719,000 budgeted for 196-'97
+ $725,000 forecasted for '97-198
$728,000 forecasted for 198-'99
$731,000 forecasted for 199-'00
wmm vp
A2 - 11

TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (C.I.P.)
DEPARTMENT CAPITAL NEED/PROJECT LISTING
•
FUNDS EARMARKED FOR FUTURE YEARS' PROJECTS
DEPARTMENT -DIVISION
NEED/PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
C.I.P.
PROJECT NO.
ESTIMATED
COST
FUNDS BUDGETED
TO. DATE *
'97 - '98
*+r
'98 - 199
t+t
19 - 'DO
Public Works Streets/Public
Works - Powell Bill
(PW-S/PW-POB).
E Ist Street
PW-S-97-184
68,250
PW-S/PW-POB
E. Sportsman Drive
PW-S-97-185
64,050
PW-S/PW-POB
E. Avalon Drive
PW-S-97-186
64,050
PW-S/PW-POB
N. Chowan
PN-S-97-187
178,500
PW-S/PW-POB
E. Palmetto Street
PW-S-97-188
59,500
PW-S/PW-POB
Wilson Street
PW-S-97-189
46,480
PW-S/PW-POB
Greenville Street
PW-S-97-190
46,480
PW-S/PW-POB
Charlotte Street
PW-S-97-191
46,480
PN-S/PW-POB
Greensboro Street
PW-S-97-192
46,480
PW-S/PW-POB
Rocky Mountain Street
PW-S-97-193
46,480
PW-S/PW-POB
W. Third Street
PW-S-97-194
14,000
PW-S/PN-POB
Georgia Lane
PW-S-97-195
44,800
PW-S/PW-POB
Calm Shell Drive
PW-S-97-197
28,000
PW-S/PW-POB
Sea Swept Road
PW-S-97-198
107,100
PW-S/PW-POB
Wyendotte Street
PW-S-97-199
107,100
PW-S PN-POB
Creek Street
PW-S-97-200
107,100
* $719,000 budgeted for '95-197
i►ir $725,000 forecasted for '97-'98
•$728,000 forecasted for '98-'99
t $731,000 forecasted for 199-'00
vmcm.a
A2 - 12

TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (C.I.P.)
DEPARTMENT CAPITAL NEED/PROJECT LISTING
•
FUNDS EARMARKED FOR FUTURE YEARS' PROJECTS
DEPARTMENT -DIVISION
NEED/PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
C.I.P.
PROJECT NO.
ESTIMATED
COST
FUNDS BUDGETED
TO DATE
'97 - '98
'98 - '99
'99 - 100
Public Works Streets/Public
Works - Powell Bill
(N-S/PW-POB)
Veterans Drive
PW-S-97-201
140,000
-
PW-S/PW-POB
E. Baum Street
PW-S-97-202
64,050
PW-S/PW-POB
Goldie Street
PW-S-97-203
10,500
PW-S/PW-POB
Calvin Street
PW-S-97-204
64,050
PW-S/PW-POB
Fox Street
PW-S-97-205
38,500
* $719000•badgeted for '96-'97
iele $725:000 forecasted for 197-'98
+t+t+e $728000 forecasted for 198-199
h**k $731:000 forecasted for 199-100
WmImep
A2-13

APPENDIX 3
TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (C.I.P.)
DEPARTMENT CAPITAL NEED/PROJECT LISTING
FUNDS EARMARKED FOR FUTURE' YEARS' PROJECTS
DEPARTMENT -DIVISION
NEED/PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
C.I.P.
PROJECT NO.
ESTIMATED
COST
FUNDS BUDGETED
TO DATE
'97 - '98*
'98 - '99*
'99 - '00*
Public Works - Public
Buildings (PW-PB)
Acquire two lots in North KOH for
parking
PW-PB-97-17
$120,000 ♦
r
$50,500 ■
PW-PB
Dune crossover - Oregon Ave
PW-PB-97-18'
30,000 ♦
$15,000 ■
PW-PB
Regional sound access - Dock Street
PW-PB-97-19
100,000 ♦
$15,000 ■
$15,000 ■
PW-PB
Improve Lake Drive ocean access
PW-PB-97-20
70,000
PW-PB
Improve Raleigh Drive ocean access
PW-PB-97-21
70,000
PW-PB
Improve Pinehurst Ave ocean access
PW-PB-97-22
70,000 ♦
r
PW-PB
Improve Aviation Ave ocean access
PW-PB-97-23
70,000 •
PW-PB
Improve Glenmere Ave ocean access
PW-PB-97-24
70,000
PW-PB
Develop Baum tract regional access
PW-PB-97-25
275,000
PW-PB
Acquire 40 lots on Bay Drive
PW-PB-97-26
200,000
PW-PB
Develop R.O.W. in Comm and HOR for
parking
PW-PB-97-27
225,000
PW-PB
•
Parking lot at Wright Brothers National
Monument -
PW-PB-97-28
100,000
•PW-PB
Acquire land between US 158 and NC 12
for parkin2
PW-PB-97-29
120,000
* $59,500 budgeted in 196-197 and $15,000 each year thereafter from '97-'98 through 199-100
■ Represents 50 match by Town
♦ Town would contribute 25% of project cost if funded by grant from Dare County Tourist Bureau or 50% of project cost if funded by grant from state.
WRKCH.DP
A3-1

AO ), PZI>
k Ilk
MEMORANDUM
TO: Greg Loy, planning Director Town of Kill Devil hills
FROM: John A. Thayer Jr. AICP, NE DCM District Planner
DATE: February 27, 1997
REF: Review of Draft Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
r-;�)A
r
I have completed a review of your' CIP document. The following are my
comments, suggestions, and questions which I hope will help update the draft
and assist you and the Town decision makers in using the document. The
general emphasis of my comments will be to both encourage a stronger clear
linkage between this document and the LUP, as well as foster its ongoing
usability.
Several important sections of the Plan have yet to be completed, which I
believe,are vital to the readability and use of the document. In progress
sections are the "Executive Summary", "Planning Methodology" and the
"Conclusion" chapters.
Originally your program included the aim of identifying or establishing "level
of service" criteria. I appreciate the difficulty in attempting to do so in mall
town which has significant service needs driven by a highly seaso \., r^1•
population. Since one of the stated purposes of the Plan has not o establish
development impact fees, such criteria is not critical to the usability of the
document. I am not suggesting no service indicators have been used, just
they are not spelled out in a formal or objective manner. I would encourage
on going efforts to establish "level of service" indicators to assist you in
determining when certain facilities or services are deficient or needed.
My comments are broken down by chapters or sections on the attached
pages.

MEMORANDUM
TO: Greg Loy, planning Director Town of Kill Devil hills
FROM: John A. Thayer Jr. AICP, NE DCM District Planner
DATE: February 6, 1997
REF: Review of Draft Capital Improvement Plan &Ipr
I have completed a review of r CIP document. The following are my
comments, suggestions, a questions which I hope will help update the draft
and assist you and th own decision makers in using the document. The
general emphasis my comments will be to linkage between this
document and a r-tirrPnt 1_UP, a I a� ���r UP —4 e.p;egFaR+getting
may. omments are broken down by cha ters or sections, where such C,
is cited' 11 be in bold print and in a smaller f t.
.An l d.r A47
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (page v) 0
You have stated that this section would be completed following review of an
updated version of this document by the Planning Board and Town Council.
What "is" provided appears to be a mixture of overview, conclusions and
statements broken down by chapter. It is confusing ....... might read better if
the paragraphs were bulleted statements with chapter in brackets at end f
statements?? —"> _
J INTRODUCTION (page viii) y ,
1, May I suggest that it may be better h%e to outline the organization of the
documen verses attempting it in the "Executive Summary" chapter. Also
recommend that some effort be put into providing a section as to how
to use the document.
1. Since the purpose of the document is not to create development fees:
You may wish to qualify, or note to readers, that the level of detail and

Kill Devil Hills CIP.com
02/27/97
N P�
precision of the information contained in the document is appropriate for
and consistent with the level of detail necessary for developing a draft
budget and Planning strategies, but not detailed enough for either final
capital improvement program budget approval (need pre -engineering) or
is it sufficient for the purposes of establishing development fees.
L,� O,
Like wise you may wish to consider use of the term "scenario", were
appropriate in the first paragraph. For example:..."is a financial scenario
document that outlines...". "... provides estimates of costs, a scheduling
of projects scenario, prioritization..." .
I believe you may wish to avoid any implying any schedule or calculation
is specific.
2. It would be helpful if some terms were also defined which will be used,
probably unfamiliar to the average citizen, for example: rolling stock, used
in th st paragraph. Suggest only defining key terms, relying on a
ction in the appendices to define other terms frequently used.
PLANNING ETHODOLOGY (I-1)
My only comm nt here is to note that nowhere in the document have I seen
levels of serv' a defined or outlined as to the ratio of population or dwelling
units..etc.. to service or facility. For example, usually capital investment and
operating expenses are based on three or more related considerations:
a. Growth- population, employment,(land use ch nges a n t i c i p in the
LUP;
b. Rate of Utilization- amount or level of each service nec ssary to
accommodate a given level of population, employment?, and,
c. Level of Service Standards- for certain services, a standard or quality of
service used to translate basic demand into targeted level of service
delivery. Most all services except water, sewer, storm drainage can be
regulated using level of service standards.
Where have you outlined the findings, assumptions and conclusions used in
w x determining need, forecasts, trends etc. for facilities listed?
OA

Kill Devil Hills CIP.com
02/27/97
INVENTORY AND CONSITION OF EXISTING CAPITAL STOCK (page II-1)
Evidently the Exhibits represent totals per Department. An overview of what
some of those totals represent would assist the user in understanding this
chapter. This chapter should cross reference with Chapter Vill L r r,Vvy
J SJ-4- V4
1 GROWTH TRENDS (page III-4)
�J Outline of what data was used for -to create ratio..LOS, or revenue
projections, service demands etc.
�• EXISTING REVENUES AND SOURCES age IV-1)
FISCAL IMPACT OF GROWTH (page V-
Suggest providing explanation of "general fund revenue". Here may be a
good place to outline an example of how the amount for one item say
property tax 1999 was developedXany assumptions or conclusions used.
Wouldn't need to be exhaustive. Example -assumes certain value, based on
assumption of units, based on tax rate example=$. Same approach example
for expenditures.
CAPITAL PROJECTS EVALUATION CRITERIA (page VI-1)
Page VIA, "B. Service Level Considerations: How was or will be unsatisfactory
levels of service determined by the Committee? Was any objective criteria
identified or used whereby some determinations, findings and conclusions
could be revisited later or annually?
Page VI-2. "C. LUP Policy Considerations" and "D. Departmental Goal
y > Considerations": Were you able to keep notes of Committees determinations?
as
I know you recognize that point systems imply an exactness. Since you have
broken down the point system per sub topics, you may wish to qualify its use
was to assist in coming up with a relative ranking.
"E. Timing Considerations" : What is the timeline assumption of + and - ? Is it
pre or post next 5 years, or 2010?
"G. Long Term Fiscal Impact": Should clarify what you mean by impact. For
example... if no project results in a constraint to development??? Project will
result in revenue?? \ p�
oM ��
3

Kill Devil Hills CIP.com
02/27/97
TARGET AREAS OF I
ENTs (page VII-1)
"B. LUP Update": You ref rence the workshop 11/96 "Vision 2010" several
places in the document. Are the facilities/LUP linkages discussed only those
provided in sections "C G" or are there other facilities and services which
were also covered for which some statements, assumptions, issues, findings
or determinations f which can could be incorporated into this document
servir,�Ilo illustrat or demonstrate the linkages between capital
improvements and t e forth coming land use plan update?
"C. Street Improvement Master Plan": Since this document was used to score
roadway project priorities, I would suggest you note it several other places in
the document. For example: in the EXECUTIVE SUMMARY and in Chapter VI.
Since section "D." states, stormwater improvements are linked to road
priorities, should note how they were or not reflected in the scoring process.
Is or are the previously ranked projects listed, and ranked anywhere in the
document? If so note where.
Should consider clarifying what you mean by "street improvements", is it
�4 primarily maintenance, or first time improvements?
�4,-�pr(�� DEPARTMENTAL PROJECTS -DESCRIPTIONS & EVALUATIONS (pag Vlll-1
ram"_
The worksheet/scoring pages (example VIII-5) are somewhat self
explanatory, however some explanation as to .......sq. ft. assumption of
annex ....... absence of $ allocation is due to decisions not having been
made?
Page VIII-16: you may wish to be clearer as to when certain
costs/improvements are listed under one department versus being broken
down under several departments..or the assumptions thereof.
The issue of co*t to benefit in prioritization needs to be visited in some
manner. Service ratio considerations or cos per dwelling unit or per sq. ft.
etc.
Issue of when to use/include personnel costs and how ongoing 0&M costs
would/can be identified generally.
Clarity of planning period horizon 12 or 13 years?
4

Kill Devil Hills CIP.com
02/27/97
RECOMMENDED CAPITAL PROJECTS (page IX-1)
Why are not the roadways listed here?
FISCAL IMPACT OF RECOMMENDED PROJECTS (page X-1)
Explain meaning of existing customer related to seasonally... which needs are
seasonal??
How significant is the land area needed to accomplish some of the facility
needs....is it large enough whereby some assumptions of loss of property
taxes needs consideration??
REVENUE GENERATING ALTERNATIVES (p CgeXl-1
What about other joint operations approaches... example regional fire fighting
authority??.... other services easier to gear up for seasonally??
`r The orientation of the listing of options should avoid using terms like should
o� and use can instead. Outlining several pros and cons is appropriate for each
alternative. Applicability to certain facilities or services should be
recognized.
n
CONCLUSION (page X11-1)
States it will be based on recommendations.
tl�
�1
s Al,
�\ V ¢
�Ilf
5