Land Development Plan-1981

II
• lease do not remove!!!!!
Division of Coastal Management
HERTFORD, NORTH CAROLINA
CAM& LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
1981
Town Council
W. D. Cox, Mayor
John Beers
Jesse Harris
Billy L. Winslow
T. Erie Haste
A. Marvin Hunter, Town Clerk
Town Planning Board
William L. Tilley, Chairman
Robert Riddick
George White
Mary Harrell
Ray Haskett
Carl Skinner
Technical Assistance by
Howard T. Capps, P.A.
Landscape Architect/Planning Consultant
Elizabeth City, North Carolina

a,
Table of Contents
Chapter I - Introduction
A. Purpose of Land Development Plan 1
Chapter II - Data Collection and Analysis
A. Present Population 3
B. Present Economy 4
C. Seasonal Population 5
D. Existing Land Use
1. Existing Land Use Introduction 9
2. Significant land use compatibility problems 9
3. Problems resulting from unplanned development 10
4. Areas experiencing or likely to experience changes
in predominant land uses 10
5. Areas of environmental concern 10
Existing Land.Use Map
Land Use Changes Since 1976 11
E. Current Plans, Policies and Regulations
1. List and summary of existing plans and policies 12
2. List and enforcement procedures for all local land
use regulations 13
3. List of all relevant federal and state regulations
affecting coastal land and water resources 13
F. Land Suitability and Constraints to Development
1. Physical limitations for development 16
a. Hazard areas (man-made/natural) 16
b. Soil limitations, shallow soils, poorly drained
soils, limitations for septic tanks 18
c. Water.supply sources 18
d. Excessive slope areas (over 12%) 18
e. Fragile areas 18
f. Areas with resource potential 18
g. Capacity of community facilities 18
1. Existing water and sewer service areas 18
2. Design capacity of existing water and sewage
treatment plants, schools and primary roads 20

3. Percentage' existing facilities are utilized 20
h. Estimated demand
1. Population and economy 21
2. Future land need 21
3. Community facilities demand 21
Chapter III - Policy Statements
A. Resource Protection Policies 23
1. Policy on AEC areas - Estuarine Waters and Public
Trust Waters 23
2. Policy on AEC areas - Estuarine Shorelines 25
3. Constraints to development (soils, flood -prone areas) 27
4. Special local resource development issues relative
to 15 NCAC 7H 27
5. Hazardous or fragile land areas 27
6. Hurricane and flood evacuation needs and plans 27
B. Resource Production and Management Policies
1. Productive agricultural lands 28
2. Commercial forest lands 28
3. Existing and potential mineral production areas 28
4. Commercial and recreational fisheries 28
5. Off -road vehicles 28
C. Economic and Community Development Policies
1. Types and locations of industries desired 31
2. Local commitment to providing services to development 31
3. Types of urban growth patterns desired 32
4. Redevelopment of developable areas 33
5. Commitment to federal and state programs in the area 33
6. Assistance to channel maintenance 34
7. Beach nourishment 34
8. Energy facility siting and development 34
9. Tourism 34
10. Waterfront access 34
D. Continuing Public Participation Policies
1. Discussion of means by which public participation in
planning matters was encouraged in plan update process 36
2. Description of the means to be used for public educa-
tion on planning issues 36
3. Description of the means to be used for continuing
public participation 36
E. Policy on other local issues
1. Second home development 36
.10
w

Chapter IV - Land Classification
A. Introduction
B. Land Classifications
C. Land Classification for Hertford
Land Classification Map
Chapter V - Synopsis
37
37
39
41
"The preparation of this report was financed in part through a grant provided
.. by the North Carolina Coastal Management Program, through funds provided by
the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, which is administered by
the Office of Coastal Zone Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration."

Chapter I Introduction
A. Purpose of Land Development Plan
The Town of Hertford prepared a Land Use Plan in 1976 in response to
the Coastal Area Management Act, passed by the North Carolina Legislature in
1974. The purpose and intent of the act is best described in Section .0101
"Introduction to Land Use Planning" Subchapter 7B - Land Use Planning Guide-
lines (as amended 9/l/79):
.0101 Introduction
(a) The Coastal Area Management Act of 1974 establishes a coopera-
tive program of coastal area management between local governments
and the state. Land use planning lies at the center of local
government's involvement, as it gives the local leaders an oppor-
tunity and responsibility to establish and enforce policies and
guide the development of their community.
(b) The purpose of the state guidelines is to assist local govern-
ments in each of the 20 coastal counties and municipalities
within those counties with the preparation of their own individual
land use plans. Each county and the municipalities within the
coastal counties are encouraged to develop a plan which reflects
the desires, needs and the best judgement of its citizens. The
land use plans prepared under these guidelines, when considered
together, form the basis for a "comprehensive plan for the pro-
tection, preservation, orderly development and management of the
coastal area of North Carolina," which is the primary objective
of the Coastal Area Management Act of 1974.
Further in the guidelines in Section .0201 (c), the heart of why
North Carolina communities and counties need to prepare land use plans is
described.
.0201 Introduction
(c) Local governments, through the land use planning process, address
issues and adopt policies that guide the development of their
community. 1bny decisions affecting development are made by other
levels of government, and local policies must take account of and
coincide with established state and federal policies. Most
decisions, however, are primarily of local concern. By carefully
and explicitly addressing these issues, other levels of government
will follow local policies that deal with these issues. Policies
which consider the type of development to be encouraged, the
density and patterns of development, and the methods of providing
beach access are examples of these local policy decisions.
More significant even than the "requirement" that communities prepare
Land Use Plans every five years is the uses that are made of the local plans
once they have been completed. In the publication, The Impact of State Regula-
tion of Coastal Land In North Carolina, prepared by Charles D. Liner of the
1

Institute of Government at Chapel Hill, he noted the impact of local land use
plans on state and federal decisions:
... Land -use plans , have a potential effect on ( local) land use because:
(a) CAMA permits may notbe issued for development that is
inconsistent with land -use plans (since CAMA permits are
required only in AECs, this effect is limited to land
within AECs).
(b) Local ordinances and regulations that apply to AECs must be
consistent with the land -use plan; local ordinances and
regulations affecting land outside AECs are subject to
review by the Coastal Resources Commission, which is autho-
rized to recommend modifications to the local government.
(c) Federal actions involving grants, licenses, permits, and
development projects must be consistent with local land -
use plans, as required by Section 307 of the FCZMA.
(d) In accordance with the Governor's Executive Order Number 15,
certain state agency actions and policies must be consistent
with land -use plans.
Over and above the requirements of the CAMA act and the uses of local
plans by state and federal permitting agencies, the local land use plan can
provide local elected and appointed officials and the citizenry an opportunity
to evaluate where they are and where they want to be.
It can be stated that the main purpose for updating the Hertford Land
Development Plan is so that all issues related to economic and physical develop-
ment can be discussed and a plan prepared which will provide a guideline for the
future growth and development of the community.
E

Chapter II Data Collection and Analysis
A. Present Population
As discussed in the 1976 Perquimans County Land Use Plan, the Town of
Hertford's population has remained approximately 2,000 people since 1910;
however, as reflected in Table I, the Town has experienced a slight drop
in population based on the 1980 Census figures. Specifically, the population
has gone from 2,023 people in 1970 to 1,941 people in 1980, which represents
a 4.1% drop in population.
Table I
Hertford Population by Township
1960 1970 1980
Bethel Township
ED 860 Hertford (Part) -0- 14 138
Hertford Township
ED 851 Hertford (Part) 2,068 2,009 1,803
Parkville Township
ED 856 Hertford (Part) -0- -0- -0-
Total Population 2,068 2,023 1,941
Source: U.S. Census Information
Table I also reflects a large shift in population between 1970 and 1980
in the Bethel Township portion of Hertford. This shift was caused by the
completion of public housing units at the intersection of U.S..17 By -Pass and
Wynne Fork Road. Specifically, this area grew from a 1970 population of 14
people to 138 people in 1980.
Because more detailed information is not available from the 1980 Census
on specific details of population characteristics such as age and race, some
_ assumptions must be made based on previous census information.
• Based on the 1976 Land Use Plan, the Town of Hertford's population had a
large percentage of citizens in the older age group. The plan also pointed
out that the younger age group, 14 years of age and younger, was decreasing.
Based on the 1980 Census figures which show a 4.1% reduction in population
since 1970, it can be assumed that this is due primarily to deaths and some
out -migration of younger citizens in search of better job opportunities.
The specific reasons for the drop in population will become more evident when
the entire results of the 1980 Census are published.
3

B. Present Economy
Hertford is the retail center of Perquimans County, with the majority of
retail business being located in the CBD area or at the shopping center on
Grubb Street. Because the population of Hertford is under-2,000 people,
detail figures on economic activity are not available for the Town.
Figures reflecting retail sales for the County are shown in Table I.
Because most of the retail businesses are located in the Town of Hertford,
these figures should be reflective of the general economic condition of the
retail businesses in Hertford. Based on that assumption, the figures indicate
that very little progress has been made in increasing retail sales as reflected
in the modest gains in gross sales for the month of February and March of 1981
over the same period of 1980. However, there was a substantial gain in sales
during January, 1981, compared to January of the previous year.
1979-80 Sales
Table I
Retail Sales
()81 SA1-P_S
Difference in Sales
Dec. 179 $2,841,117 Dec. 180 $2,628,547 .-212,570
Jan. 180 2,123,723 Jan. 181 2,796,305 +672,582
Feb. 180 2,294,616 Feb. 181 2,297,859 + 3,243
Mar. 180 2,651,772 Mar. 181 2,654,233 + 2,461
As shown on Table II, the 1978 Labor Force for Perquimans County had
450 persons employed in manufacturing jobs, 1,210 in non -manufacturing,
430 in agriculture and 300 self-employed in non-agricultural jobs. Of the
1,210 in non -manufacturing jobs, 450 persons are employed in government work
with 410 in the trades.
Illustration III shows the Manufacturers Production Average Wages for 1979
in Region R and Tidewater Virginia. Of the ten -county Region, Perquimans
County has the fourth -lowest average wage for manufacturing jobs. Camden,
Hyde and Tyrrell Counties averaged $3.10 per hour in 1979, with Perquimans
County at $3.20 per hour. Tidewater Virginia is at $6.19 per hour, double
that of Perquimans County.
Based on information from the Employment Security Commission, 203 individuals
are traveling to Tidewater Virginia for jobs in manufacturing. Although this
trip requires three hours of travel per day, many Perquimans County workers
find the driving worth the increase in wages as reflected in Illustration III
If these manufacturing job opportunities were available in the County or Region,
many of the individuals would then have the choice of working closer to home.
If these jobs could be provided, it could be anticipated that they would
have more disposable income to use in the local.economy rather than spending it
on the high cost of commuting to Tidewater Virginia for work.
4

Table IV provides a Labor Profile of Perquimans County based on 1978
information. In 1978, there were 3,430 individuals in the civilian labor
force with 3,290 employed. As shown on Table IV, the highest non -manufacturing
job classification wage is Transportation, Communication and Public Utilities
at $206.04 per week. This represents an annual income of $10,714 per year.
Government workers, with annual average insured weekly wages of $172.92 or
$8,991.84 per year, is the only other job group with an annual income of over
$8,000. All other groups have an annual income of less than $8,000 based on
1978 data. Based on Employment Security Commission information, Perquimans
County in 1979 had 2,334 underemployed persons making less than $8,000 per year.
Summary
Base data was assembled from several sources including the Soil Conservation
Service, Employment Security Commission, Department of Transportation, Depart-
ment of Revenue and the Census Bureau.
Based on the initial 1980 census figures, the Town of Hertford has lost
population. Because of the lack of detailed 1980 census information, it was
assumed that some of the population loss was due to deaths and some out -
migration of younger citizens in search of better job opportunities.
Employment Security Commission data shows many citizens are employed in
non-agricultural and non -manufacturing jobs. Based on the same source of
information, 203 residents of Perquimans County and Hertford are traveling
to Tidewater, Virginia, for manufacturing jobs which pay an average of approx-
imately twice as much as the rate paid in Perquimans County.
It is apparent that if the trend to out -migration is going to be stopped
during the planning period, the officials and citizens of Hertford are going
to have to work together to provide more jobs and better paying jobs for
area citizens. This must be done in both the retail and manufacturing segments
of the economy.
C. Seasonal Population
Hertford does not have any seasonal population to speak of. However,
during discussions with the Planning Board and Mayor it is agreed that some
recreational fishermen do visit the community, primarily on weekends for
events such as bass fishing tournaments, and that this type of activity should
be encouraged and promoted.
5

Table II
PERQUIMANS COUNTY
WORK FORCE
(JOBS IN COUNTY)
Other
manUTacturing Nonmanufacturiny Agri. Nonag.
450 "
(1,210)
(430)
=(300) I
•
3000
2 500
t
2000
1500
II
1000
.
900
800
700
600
500
450
_
410
430
400 390
300
300
200
120
100 60
50 90 60.
30
0
Food Apparel Lumber & Other
Const. Trans. Trade Fin. Serv. Gov. Other
.Agri.
Other
(Self-
Wood (Appare
Employed
Metals,
M
Const. & Transp.
Source: Elizabeth City Employment Security Commission 6
i

Illustration III
WAGES
(Mfg. Production Average -
1979)
NORFOLK-VA BEACH-
PORTSMOUTH S14SA
(Includes CURRITUCK
County)
Source: Elizabeth City Employment Security Commission

Table IV
`
LABOR PROFILE
PERQUIMANS COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
1
1978
1970
1960
1970-78
1960-70
TOTAL POPULATION Estimates
Census
Census
Change
,'. Change .
County 81800
8,351
9,178
5.4
_9.•0
Hertford 1,930
2,023
2,068
-4.6
-2.2
Population Characteristics
Georraphfc Distribution
Number Percqnt
Population per square mile
35.7 (1978)
Female 4,600 52.3
Population within a 25 mile radius of
Nonwnite 3,600 40.8
Hertford
66,605 (1970)
LABOR FORCE ESTIMATES
1978
1977
1976
1975
1974
Civilian Labor Force
3,430
3,060
3,320
3,260
2,990
Unemployment, Total
140
170
180
200
120
Unemployment Rate
40
5.6
5.4
6.1
4.0
Employment, Total
3,290
2,890'
3,140
3,060
2,870
Agricultural
430
470
560
540
520
flonag. Wage d Salary
2,560
2,160
2,310
2,240
2,090
All Other Nonae.
300
260
270
280
260
INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURE - 1978
Annual
average
Number of Firms
Emolovment
Insured Weekly Waaes
Total Nonag. Wage d Salary
174
1,551
S 138.99
Manufacturing
16
446
126.91
14
` Nonmanufacturing
158
1,105
142.71
Construction
23
115
150.50
Transp., _Comm. d Public Utilities
7
28
Trade
206.04
69
398
140.12
Finance, Insurance b Real Estate
6
46
125.42
Services
26
78
73.96
Government
23
367
172.92
Other
4
73
MEW AND EXPANDI`G INDUSTRY
PLANT CLOSINGS a PEIZNANENT, LAYOFFS `
Number of Firms Employees
Number of
Firms Employees
1973 - -
1978
.979 _ _
1979
Source: Elizabeth
City Employment
Security Commission
$

D. Existing Land Use
1. Existing Land Use Introduction
As discussed in the 1976 Land Use Plan and reflected on the 1976
land use map, Hertford's land use is primarily residential, agricultural
and wooded. The Town's northern boundary runs along the Perquimans
River, with the northwestern section of Hertford containing most of the
residential and commercial development. Specifically, commercial develop-
ment is concentrated in the CBD area with additional commercial development
at the shopping center on Grubb Street. Public land uses include the
municipal building complex between Grubb Street and the river, the Library,
Park and recreation office also located on Grubb Street and backing onto
the Perquimans River. The City fire station and ice plant also represent
a large land area in public use. The southwestern quadrant of the com--
munity is primarily agricultural in use with the exception of a gas
storage area and small industrial site adjacent to the railroad tracks
at Wynne Fork Road.
In an effort to update existing land use information from the 1976
plan, a windshield survey was conducted. Based on that survey and
discussions with the Town Manager, it was determined that only a few
minor changes have taken place since the 1976 plan was prepared.
Artie Drive is a new street that has been added to the street system
with some residential development. Also in the same area of Hertford,
Gaston Drive has been extended with several nice homes being developed
along this new section of street. Several new homes have been developed
along Wynne Fork Road just outside the Town Limits. In the King Street
area, 33 substandard houses have been demolished since 1976 through the
Town's Community Development Program. Also, the Town has acquired one
oil company site adjacent to the municipal building for expansion of the
municipal facilities. A vacant industrial site located on Grubb Street
and the Perquimans River is being converted into a water -based recreation
facility. The Town has also acquired what was in 1976 a private recreation
facility behind the public library for public recreation use. The
facility includes two tennis courts, an open play area and remodeled
building used by elderly citizens in Hertford. There have been no
major residential developments in Hertford since the 1976 Land Use Plan
was prepared.
2. Significant Land Use Compatibility Problems
One significant compatibility problem that presently exists, as it
did during the preparation of the 1976 plan, is the fuel storage facilities
along the Perquimans River. The 1976 plan discussed the fact that the
close proximity to residential areas had some potential hazards. Since
1976 this was found to be true because of a major fire which destroyed
one oil company and at one time threatened the downtown area of Hertford.
However, another oil company still remains on the waterfront and presents
the same potential hazard for surrounding residences.
. Another potential compatibility problem is the location of a bulk
gas storage facility and industrial site used by FCX at the intersection
9

of Wynne Fork Road and the Norfolk Southern Railroad. Because these
facilities are located in what will most likely be developed for
residential use,in the future, they may have an adverse affect on land
values for residential development and thereby affect the quality of
future residential development. However, residential development in
this area will most likely not take place during the ten-year planning
period. It is an area that the Town should consider for zoning to
guide and control future development. As can be seen on the land use
map, residential development is already beginning to take place on
Wynne Fork Road west of Edenton Road.
3. Problems Resulting From Unplanned Development
Problems resulting from unplanned development are primarily associated
with areas that were developed before subdivision regulations. Much of
this early development did not allow adequate street widths, and thereby
has created crowding conditions such as those found on King, Dobb and
Market Streets west of Edenton Road. These same conditions existed in
the King Street, Covent Garden, Gum Street area, but are being corrected
through a community development project.
4. Areas Experiencing or Likely to Experience Changes in Predominant
Land Uses
The area adjacent to the intersection of U.S. 17 Bypass and Church
Street has been changing with the development of two service stations and
a restaurant. This changing in land use from agriculture to commercial
can be expected to continue. Depending on the promotional efforts for
the Newbold -White House and the number of visitors using Church Street to
visit this historic site, this area has some potential to develop with
services to meet the needs of tourists visiting the area.
5. Areas of Environmental Concern
There are three areas of environmental concern in Hertford: Estuarine
Waters, Public Trust Waters and Estuarine Shorelines.
The Perquimans River and Castleton Creek make up the Estuarine Waters
and Public Trust Waters. The land area within 75 feet of these estuarine
waters make up the Estuarine Shoreline. These areas of environmental
concern are discussed in more detail in Chapter III.
lim

Nlfti�s
EXISTING LAND USE MAP
Alfa j or Land Use Changes Since 1976
1. Former industrial site purchased by Town for water- H ER T F O R D
front park. NORTH- CAROLINA
2. Former oil company site purchased by Town to provide
additional space for municipal building and parking.
3. Blighted area has been cleared by Town utilizing a ,
HUD grant. New standard street system to be developed.
4. Former agricultural area converted to residential area.
New street construction.
5. Gaston Drive extended with new residential development.
6. New restaurant and service station facility constructed.;-'�"

E.
Current Plans, Policies and Regulations
1. List and Summary of Existing Plans and Policies
a. 1976 Perquimans County Land Use Plan
b. 1979 11201" Facilities Plan
c. 1978 Housing Assistance Plan
d. 1977 Hertford Community Development Plan
e. 1977 Recreation and Open Space Plan
f. 1978 Community Facilities and Public Improvements Plan
g. 1977 Downtown Improvements Plan
In 1976, Hertford was included as part of Perquimans County's Land
Use Plan. Several of the goals established during the planning process
have been implemented or are in the process of implementation. Specifically,
the plan called for establishment of an inspection department which has
now been established. The plan also called for enforcement of the
building code with periodic building inspection. This has been an on -going
process since establishment of the inspection department, with several
structures being either demolished or renovated since 1976. The plan
also called for alleviation of problem areas in the Town such as poor
.
housing. This has been accomplished through a Community Development Block
Grant that was received in 1977. The provision of more public boat
facilities and scenic outlooks was called for. The Town has completed
one part of this objective by redevelopment of an existing boat ramp
utilizing a Soil Conservation Grant and Coastal Plains Supplemental Grant.
r
jf
The Town is also in the process of developing a water -based recreation
facility on the Perquimans River that will serve as a passive and active
recreation facility and scenic outlook.
yc
re
The desirability of establishing an historic district and supporting
the promotion of tourism was recommended. Shortly after completion of the
�;
1976 Land Use Plan, the Town, in cooperation with the County, arranged
to have Archives and History staff members prepare a detail analysis of
existing historic structures located in the Town and County. This infor-
mation will be published in the near future and can be used in establishing
a local historic district.
Seeking more industry was of great concern in the 1976 Land Use Plan.
rtY`G10--'y� °~ Since 1976, the Town of Hertford, in cooperation with the County, has
JayL4z� worked hard to recruit new industry. The Town, through its efforts,
C�V its, has been designated by the Governor as a.Community of Excellence.
The 1979 11201" Facilities Plan has reviewed current wastewater
treatment facilities and capacities and has made recommendations on needed
improvements.
The Housing Assistance Plan was prepared to give Hertford a compre-
hensive plan to provide goals and guidance in addressing housing needs of
the community. The 1977 Community Development Plan was prepared and funded
by HUD. The purpose of•the plan was to eliminate blighting conditions and
substandard housing in the community. This plan has been implemented
since the 1976 Land Development Plan was prepared.
12

Several suggestions made in the 1977 Recreation and Open Space
Plan have been or are being implemented. Specifically, the municipal
boat docking facilities have been improved with wider boat ramps and •
docks and additional parking for boat trailers. The private recreation
facilities located at Grubb Street and W. Academy have been purchased
by the Town for public recreational uses. The water -based recreational
facilities between Grubb Street and the Perquimans.River are now being
developed.
The Community Facilities and Public Improvements Plan prepared in
1978 is an update of the plan prepared in 1967. The purpose of the plan
is to outline municipal needs and priorities for capital expenditures.
The Downtown Development Plan made recommendations on parking, street
scape and facade improvements for the CBD area.
2. List and Enforcement Procedures for All Local Land Use Regulations
a. 1980 Zoning Ordinance
b. Subdivision Regulations
c. CAMA Permits
d. Building and Electrical Inspection
e. Flood Insurance Program
The Hertford Planning Board administers both the 1980 Zoning Ordinance
and Subdivision Regulations. Mr. Keith Haskett administers minor CAMA
permits. Mr. Sam Long administers the Building and Electrical Code
compliance and inspection. Flood insurance requirements are administered
by the building inspector.
3. List of All Relevant Federal and State Regulations Affecting Coastal
Land and Water Resources
Listed below are very brief descriptions of the types of developments
which may come under the jurisdiction of various state and federal
agencies. Some of these types of development may never take place in
Hertford, but it is considered necessary to list all pertinent agencies
which could exercise influence on various potential developments.
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development, Division of
Environmental Management:
1. Permits to discharge to surface waters or operate waste water treatment
plants or oil discharge permits; NPDES Permits (G.S. 143-215)
2. Permits for septic tanks with a capacity over 3000 gallons/day
(G.S. 143-215.3)
3. Permits for withdrawal of surface or ground water in capacity use
areas (G.S. 143-215.15)
4. Permits for air pollution abatement facilities and sources
(G.S. 143-215.108)
5. Permits for construction of complex sources; e.g. parking lots, sub-
divisions, stadiums, etc. (G.S. 143-215.109)
6. Permits for construction of a well over 100,000 gallons/day (G.S. 87-88)
13

Department of Natural Resources and Community Development, Office of
Coastal Management:
1. Permits to dredge and/or fill in estuarine waters, tidelands, etc.
( G.S.113-229 )
2. Permits to undertake development in Areas of Environmental Concern
(G.S. 113A-118) Note: Minor development permits are issued by the
local government.
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development, Division of
Earth Resources:
1. Permits to alter or construct a dam (G.S. 143-215.66)
2. Permits to mine (G.S. 74-51)
3. Permits to drill an exploratory oil or gas well (G.S. 113-381)
4. Permits to conduct geographical exploration.(G.S. 113-391)
5. Sedimentation erosion control plans for any land -disturbing activity
of over one contiguous acre (G.S. 113A-54)
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development, Secretary of
NRCD:
1. Permits to construct an oil refinery
Department of Administration:
1. Easements to fill where lands are proposed to be raised above the
normal high water mark of navigable waters by filling (G.S. 146.6(c))
Department of Human Resources:
1. Approval to operate a solid waste disposal site or facility (G.S. 130-
166.16 )
2. Approval for construction of any public water supply facility that
furnishes water to ten or more residences (G.S. 130-160.1)
Army Corps of Engineers (Department of Defense):
1. Permits required under Sections 9 and 10 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899; permits to construct in navigable waters
2. Permits required under Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research
and Sanctuaries Act of 1972
3. Permits required under Section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution
Control Act of 1972; permits to undertake dredging and/or filling
activities
Coast Guard (Department of Transportation):
1. Permits for bridges, causeways, pipelines over navigable waters;
required under the General Bridge Act of 1946 and the Rivers and
Harbors Act of 1899
2. Deep water port permits
Geological Survey, Bureau of Land Management (Department of Interior):
14

1. Permits required for off -shore drilling
2. Approvals of OCS pipeline corridor rights -of -way
Nuclear Regulatory Committee:
1. Licenses for siting, construction and operation of nuclear power plants;
required under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and Title II of the
Energy Reorganization Act of 1974
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission:
1. Permits for construction, operation and maintenance of interstate
pipelines facilities required under the Natural Gas Act of 1938
2. Orders of interconnection of electric transmission facilities under
Section 202 (b) of the Federal Power Act
3. Permission required for abandonment of natural gas pipeline and
associated facilities under Section 7C (b) of the Natural Gas Act of
1938
4. Licenses for non-federal hydro -electric projects and associated
transmission lines under Section 4 and 15 of the Federal Power Act
15

F.
Land Suitability and Constraints to Development
1. Physical Limitations for Development
a. Hazard areas (man-made/natural)
As discussed earlier, the only potential man-made hazard
affecting Hertford is the fuel oil storage facility located
between Grubb Street and the Perquimans River. This facility
is in close proximity to both residential and commercial areas.
The facility has the obvious hazard of fire or explosion.
b. Soil limitations
During the preparation of the 1976 Land Development Plan,
only a general soils map was available for the Town and County.
Since 1976, the Soil Conservation Service, in conjunction with
the Department of Natural Resources and Community Development,
has been working on a detail soils report which is now partially
complete in draft form. The assistance of a soil scientist should
be used for detail interpretation of soil conditions.
Soil Types in Hertford, N. C.
Symbol
Soil Mapping Unit Name
UL
Urban Land
56
Augusta -Urban Land Complex
58
State -Urban Land Complex
94
Dorovan Muck
385B
State Fine Sandy Loam
430A
Altavista Fine Sandy Loam
569
Augusta Fine Sandy Loam
876
Tomotley Fine Sandy Loam
The above soil types and abbreviations are found in the Soil Survey
for Perquimans County. Hertford is shown on maps 17 and 25 in that
report.
UL Urban Land - Areas where more than 85% of the area is covered
with streets, buildings and parking lots, etc. This soil type
has been greatly altered by cutting, filling and grading.
Excessive water runoff from roofs, roads and parking lots
which can increase flooding hazards on lower lying areas.
Severe hazard of waterway Siltation from areas that are graded
and not immediately stabilized. Slopes in this area range
from 0 to 6%.
56 Augusta -Urban Land Complex - This soil type consists of 70%
Augusta and 10% urban land. This is.nearly level, somewhat
poorly drained soil in shallow depressions and in low, smooth
ridges adjacent to small streams.

58 State -Urban Land Complex - This is well -drained soil on slightly
rounded ridges adjacent to the Perquimans River and along small
streams.
94 Dorovan Muck'- This nearly -level, very poorly drained soil is on
the floodplain of the Perquimans River and larger streams that
flow into the river. This soil is composed of highly decomposed
organic matter. This soil floods frequently for long periods of
time and is not suitable for septic tank use because of high water
table, frequent flooding and slow percolation. This soil also
has severe problems for building sites or road development.
385B State Fine Sandy Loam - This well -drained soil is on slightly
rounded ridges adjacent to the Perquimans River and along small
streams. Permeability is moderate to moderately -rapid. The
seasonal high water table is below a depth of 6 feet. The
potential for urban and recreational uses is high with only
slight problems being anticipated for septic tank use or foundation
construction.
430A Altavista Fine Sandy Loam - This nearly -level somewhat poorly
drained soil is in depressions and on low smooth ridges adjacent
to small streams and waterways. Permeability is moderately rapid.
The seasonal high water table is within 1 to 2.5 feet of the
surface. Potential for most urban uses is low because of wetness
and seasonal high water table. Extensive drainage and site
modifications improve the potential for dwelling construction
and septic tank use.
569 Augusta Fine Sandy Loam - This nearly level somewhat poorly
drained soil is in shallow depressions and low smooth ridges
adjacent to small streams. Permeability is moderate with the I
seasonal high water table within 1 to 2 feet of the surface.
The potential for most urban uses is low because of wetness and
seasonal high water table. Extensive drainage and site modifications
improve the potential for dwellings with septic tank absorption
fields. The potential for most recreational uses is low because
of wetness.
876 Tomotley Fine Sandy Loam - This nearly level poorly drained soil
is on flats and in slight depressions. The organic matter content
of the surface layer is medium. Permeability is moderate to
moderately slow, with the seasonal high water table within 1 foot
of the surface. The potential for most urban uses is low because
of wetness and seasonal high water table. Extensive drainage and
site modifications improve the potential for dwellings with septic
tank absorption fields. The potential for most recreational uses
is low because of wetness.
Based on the soil survey, the area on the north and south side of
Grubb Street extended and west of the Town Limits has the best soils for
urban development; specifically, the area shown with State Fine Sandy
Loam 385B and Altavista Fine Sandy Loam 430A. The area west of the Town
Limits and now in agricultural production shown with Augusta Fine Sandy
Loam also has some urban development potential, but development costs
for roads would probably be higher because of soil characteristics. It
is recommended that this area be developed only if water and sewer lines
17

are extended to the area and septic tanks are not used because of this
area's close proximity to the Town's two well fields which are located
north of Wynne Fork Road and adjacent to the Norfolk Southern Railroad
line. The area east of Edenton Road between Castleton Creek and
Wynne Fork Road is also an excellent area for urban development with
the State Fine Sandy Lgam 430A and Altavista Fine Sandy Loam 385B
being the predominant soil types. .
c. Water supply
Two deep wells are located north of Wynne Fork Road and west of the
Norfolk and Southern Railroad lines. These two wells have a combined
pumping capacity of 600,000 gallons a day. Although the capacity of
the system is excellent, several areas of Hertford are served by
inadequate sized 2" lines.
d. Excessive slope areas
As shown in the detail soils report, there are no areas in
Hertford with slopes over 6%.
e. Fragile areas
Hertford contains one natural area which is fragile, specifically
the Perquimans River and its tributaries. The community and local
officials expressed their concern for this fragile resource in the
results of the planning questionnaire and in the policy statement
pertaining to the river. Man-made fragile areas include the many
historic structures located in Hertford. The specific structures of
historic significance will soon be published by the State as part
of the historic site inventory for Hertford and Perquimans County.
f. Areas with resource potential
The Planning Board discussed areas of the Town that are presently
under agricultural production and felt that they were not unique
agricultural areas. They also determined that the Town does not contain
valuable mineral sites or publicly -owned forests or privately -owned
wildlife sanctuaries.
g. Capacity of community facilities
1. Existing water and sewer service areas
As discussed earlier, the Town has two deep wells that can
produce 600,000 gallons of water per day. The Water System Map -
shows the location of existing water lines which serve all of the
developed section of Hertford. The only major water line extension
made in recent years was the extension of lines along Wynne Fork _
Road to serve the public housing site on U.S. 17 Bypass.
The existing 0.300 mgd Hertford secondary treatment facility
was placed in operation in 1967 when major improvements to the
collection system were completed. The plant performance has been
18

satisfactory; however, infiltration and inflow (I/I) experienced
during wet weather result in flows that exceed the plant capacity.
As part of the 11201" study, an Infiltration/Inflow Analysis was
undertaken to determine if extraneous water entering the collection
system was excessive. The analysis concluded that it would be more
economical to rehabilitate portions of the system and reduce the
quantities of I/I than it would be to construct facilities to
treat the extraneous flows.
The Existing Sewer System I&p shows the present layout of the
system.
2. Design capacity of existing water and sewage treatment plant,
schools and primary highways
The 600,000 gallon capacity of the water system is considered
adequate to meet the current and projected needs for Hertford.
The Town's sanitary sewer system can handle the needs for 3,000
people, but will not be considered adequate until the infiltration
problems can be addressed as recommended in the 1979 11201" Facilities
Plan prepared by Wm. F. Freeman Associates.
The Town of Hertford is served by four schools in the Per-
quimans County,School System. Table I provides information on
each school.
Table I
1981 Design* Mobile Units Year
School Students Capacity in Use Built
Perquimans Central 339 375 1 1935
Hertford Grammar 367 425 1 1952
Perquimans Union 453 500 0
Perquimans High School 560 650 0 1926
(1980 renovation)
*Design capacity reflects current additions or renovations currently
in place and normal class size based on recognized state standards.
Based on information provided by the Superintendent of Schools,
the facilities listed above should be adequate to serve the needs
of Hertford citizens during the next 10 years. This is based on
a recent trend toward a decrease in student population until recently
when the population stabilized below the design capacity of each
of the schools in the system.
The school system has recently completed Phase I improvements
to the high school which included the construction of 12 classrooms,
renovated library, 2 dressing rooms and administrative space.
Phase II calls for the replacement of the two-story building.
Phase III calls for the renovation of the vocational complex.
Additional classrooms are.planned for both Hertford Grammar and
Perquimans Central. Expanded library facilities at Hertford
19

Grammar are also planned, with modifications to accommodate
the handicapped being planned for all schools in the system.
The only primary road in Hertford is U.S. 17 Bypass, which
is a major link from the Piedmont section of North Carolina to
the Outer Banks. This is a two-lane limited access highway
running through the eastern section of Hertford.
3. Percentage existing facilities are utilized
(a) Water system
The Town is currently running the two deep wells between
10 to 12,hours per day and producing from 250,000 to 300,000
gallons of water per day. This is approximately one half
the volume of water the system is designed to produce on a
daily basis.
(b ) Sewage treatment plant
The sewage treatment plant is,often operating at design
capacity of 300,000 gallons per day. This is due primarily
to infiltration into the system. However, the 11201" study
identified this problem and the Town is presently using
cameras to survey the system for leaks with plans to address
the problem utilizing clean water funds from the State.
(c) Schools
As shown in Table I above, all four schools are presently
under-utilized based on the number of students in each school
and the actual design capacity. Perquimans Central had 36
fewer students than its design capacity. Hertford Grammar
had 58 fewer, Perquimans Union had 47 fewer and Perquimans
High School had 90 fewer students.
(d) Primary Roads
1980 traffic counts showed a volume of 4,100 vehicles
per day traveling along U.S. 17 between State Road 1338
and the Perquimans River bridge. To determine the capacity
of the major thoroughfare, the Department of Transportation
provided the following information:
Using a 60% directional factor and a 12% hourly factor,
this section of highway is carrying approximately 300 vehicles
per hour. This does not take into consideration possible
increases in use during the summer months by vehicles travel-
ing to the beach. The Department of Transportation classifies
highways between A and F, with A being the most efficient
highway section and F being the worst. A good level of service
is the B catagory, and the Department of Transportation uses
this level when designing highways. Based on the above -
referenced factors, this section of highway could triple the
20

number of vehicles using the road and still be considered
a B level system. ,
h. Estimated demand
1. Population and economy
The State of North Carolina Department of Administration
makes periodic estimates of population growth for every county in
the State. These estimates are derived from mathematical models
which include many variables, such as location within the State,
past population trends and new industrial locations. The most
recent estimate for Perquimans County calls for a 1990 county
population of 9,800. Based on the recently released county
census figures for 1980, showing 9,486 people in the county, it
seems quite possible that this 1990 estimated population for the
county will be reached. Because Hertford has a population under
5,000 people, the Department of Administration cannot provide
population estimates for Hertford in 1990. Therefore, it is
necessary to make a population estimate for 1990 based on the
best information available. It is apparent from 1980 census
figures that the county as a whole is increasing in population
while the Town of Hertford is decreasing in population. As
indicated in the 1980 Perquimans County Land Use Plan, most of
the county's increase in population between 1970 and 1980 took
place in the Bethel, New Hope and Parkville townships. It is
assumed in the County land use plan that since these areas
exhibited the greatest growth during the period between 1970 and
1980, that they can be expected to receive the majority of the
county's growth during the next 10 years. This growth will be in
the form of strip residential development in the County and along
the river and sound. For planning purposes it appears reasonable
to assume that during the next 10 years the Town, through
industrial development efforts and possible annexation, can at a
minimum stop the population loss. Therefore, the 1980 census
figure of 1,941 people will be used for the 1990 population estimate.
The designation of Hertford as a Community of Excellence and
its continued cooperation with the County should enable the Town
to locate some new industry in the community during the next 10
years. However, it is impossible to forecast the number of jobs
that may be created during the next 10 years. The citizens' and
local officials' interest in promoting the heritage of the community
as an economic resource can also be expected to have a positive
economic impact on the community. However, the exact affect
this might have on the local economy is difficult to estimate.
2. Future land needs
Based on the estimate that during the 10-year planning
period the Town will retain approximately the same population,
all future residential, commercial and industrial development can
easily be accommodated within the Town's limits. The Town should
encourage development of existing platted lots and redevelopment
21

of substandard in -town locations during the planning period.
3. Community facilities demand
All community facilities should be adequate to serve the needs
of Hertford during the planning period. The Town should continue
to work, however, on resolving the infiltration problems that are
now being experienced with the sewer system. The school administra-
tion should continue to upgrade their facilities as called for in
the master plan. In continuing to work in both of these areas
the Town of Hertford can be made more attractive for industrial
prospects during the planning period.
22

Chapter III Policy Statements
A. Resource Protection Policies - AEC's
1. Estuarine Waters and Public Trust Areas
a. Importance: Estuarine waters are defined in G.S. 113A-113
(b)(2) as, "all the water of the Atlantic Ocean within the boun-
dary of North Carolina and all the waters of the bays, sounds,
rivers, and tributaries thereto seaward of the dividing line
between coastal fishing waters and inland fishing waters, as set
forth in an agreement adopted by the Wildlife Resources Commission
and the Department of Conservation and Development filed with the
Secretary of State entitled "Boundary Lines, North Carolina
Commercial Fishing - Inland Fishing Waters," revised March 1, 1965."
Public trust areas are "All waters of the Atlantic Ocean and
the lands thereunder from the mean high water mark to the seaward
limit of State jurisdiction; all natural bodies of water subject
to measurable lunar tides and lands thereunder to the mean high
water mark; all navigable natural bodies of water and lands there-
under to the mean or ordinary high water mark as the case may be,
except privately owned lakes having no public access; all waters
in artificially created bodies of water in which exists significant
public fishing resources or other public resources, which are access-
ible to the public by navigation from bodies of water in which the
public has rights of navigation; all waters in artificially created
bodies of water in which the public has acquired rights by prescrip-
tion, custom, usage, dedication or any other means. In determining
whether the public has acquired rights in artificially created
bodies of water, the following factors shall be considered: (i) the
use of the body of water by the public; (ii) the length of time
the public has used the area; (iii) the value of public resources
in the body of water; (iv) whether the public resources in the body
of water are mobile to the extent that they can move into natural
bodies of water; (v) whether the creation of the artificial body
of water required permission from the State; and (vi) the value
of the body of water to the public for navigation from one public
area to another public area.
Although estuarine waters and public trust areas are treated
separately in the CANA Guidelines, they will be considered as one
for the purpose of this update. The distinction drawn between
them in the guidelines is an artificial one and has no basis other
than as a political division between the commercial and sport
fisheries interest. The significance of both areas is identical
as are the appropriate land uses.
The estuaries are among the most productive natural environ-
ments of North Carolina. They support valuable commercial and
sports fisheries of the coastal area and are utilized for navigation,
recreation and aesthetic purposes.
23

The importance of the Perquimans River, which is part of the
Estuarine Water System and a Public Trust Area, is reflected in
citizen response to questions pertaining to this subject. Specifi-
cally, 86.3% of citizens felt that recreational fishing in the
Perquimans River was important to the local economy. The Planning
Board discussed this°subject at great length during 'a Planning .
Board Meeting and felt very strongly that the water quality of the
Perquimans River must be maintained or improved if at all possible.
The Planning Board feels that the Estuarine Waters and Public
Trust Waters are an important recreational resource for local
residents as well as visiting recreational fishermen. It is also
important to the State as a whole because it is part of the overall
estuarine ecosystem.
b. Policy
The Town of Hertford shall have a policy to do all in its
power to protect public rights for navigation and recreation and
to assist Federal and State agencies in preserving and managing
the public trust waters and estuarine waters in an effort to safe-
guard and perpetuate their biological, economic and aesthetic value.
c. Appropriate Uses
Public Trust Areas - Appropriate uses shall be those consistent
with the above policy objective. Any land use which interferes with
the public right of navigation, or other public trust rights, which
the public may be found to have in these waters, shall not be allowed.
The development of navigational channels, drainage ditches, the
use of bulkheads to prevent erosion, and the building of piers or
wharfs are examples of land uses appropriate within public trust waters
provided that such land uses will not be detrimental to the bio-
logical and physical functions and public trust rights. Projects
which would directly block or impair existing navigation channels,
increase shoreline erosion, deposit spoils below mean high tide,
cause adverse water circulation patterns, violate water quality
standards, or cause degradation of shellfish waters are generally
considered incompatible with the management of public trust waters.
Estuarine Waters - Appropriate uses shall be those consistent
with the above policy objective. Highest priority shall be
allocated to the conservation of estuarine waters. The development
of navigational channels, the use of bulkheads to prevent erosion,
and the building of piers or wharfs where no other feasible alter-
native exists are examples of land uses appropriate within estuarine
waters -,_provided that such land uses will'not be detrimental to
------ the -biological and physical estuarine functions and public trust
rights. Projects which would directly or indirectly block or impair
existing navigation channels, increase shoreline erosion, deposit
spoils below mean high tide, cause adverse water circulation patterns,
violate _-water quality standards, or cause degradation of shellfish
- w- witers are generally considered incompatible with the management of
estuarine waters.
24

d. Alternative policies considered
1) The Town of Hertford could elect to do nothing about the
development that takes place within the boundaries of the
estuarine system.
2) The Town's local CAMA officer could continue to monitor the
type of development proposed in and adjacent to the Perquimans
River and its tributaries and.approve only those minor develop-
ments that will not adversely affect navigation or water quality.
Endorse recommendations made by Coastal Resources Commission and
Corps of Engineers pertaining to major developments in the
Perquimans River and tributaries.
3) Allow Coastal Resources Commission and Corps of Engineers
to monitor and approve all future development proposed for the
Estuarine waters and public trust waters.
4) The Town of Hertford could have a policy to do all in its
power to protect public rights for navigation and recreation and
to assist Federal and State agencies in the preserving and
managing of the public trust waters and estuarine waters in an
effort to safeguard and perpetuate their biological, economic
and aesthetic value.
e. Implementation strategy
The Town of Hertford will continue to cooperate with all State
and Federal agencies in monitoring the water quality of the Per-
quimans River.
2. Estuarine Shorelines
a. Importance: Estuarine shorelines are those non -ocean shorelines
which are especially vulnerable to erosion, flooding, or other
adverse effects of wind and water and are intimately connected to
the estuary. This area extends from the mean high water level or
normal water level along the estuaries, sounds, bays, and brackish
waters as set forth in an agreement adopted by the Wildlife Resources
Commission and the Department of Natural Resources and Community
Development (described in Regulation .0206(a)) for a distance
75 feet landward.
Development within estuarine shorelines influences the quality
of estuarine life and is subject to the damaging processes of shore
front erosion and flooding.
b. Policy
} The Town of Hertford shall have a policy to ensure shoreline
development is compatible with both the dynamic nature of estuarine
shorelines and the values of the estuarine system.
25

c. Appropriate Land Uses
Appropriate uses shall be consistent with the above policy
objective. Specifically, all development located in Zone A on the
Flood Hazard zone map should be elevated and conform to Hertford's
Flood Insurance Program. All Development should be compatible with
existing land uses. All areas should be able to handle surface
run off and connected to town sewer.
d. Alternative policies considered
1) Take no action.
2) Restrict all development within 75 feet of estuarine
shoreline.
3) Review all proposed shoreline development to ensure that
it is compatible with both the dynamic nature of estuarine
shorelines and the values of the estuarine system.
e. Implementation strategy
1 Local permit officer shall continue to review all proposed
development within 75 foot setback to ensure it is compatible
with the Town of Hertford's policy.
26

3. Constraints to development (soils, flood -prone areas)
With the completion of the detail soils map of Hertford and the FIA
Flood Hazard Boundary Map completed in 1976, the Planning Board has
planning tools to assist property owners in proper development of their
property. The Planning Board will utilize both of these tools when
reviewing proposed subdivision plats to determine if soil characteristics
will cause problems in converting property to urban uses. This review
process will assist property owners in determining the best way to use
their land prior to expenditure of funds for road development and septic
tanks if this type of development is found to be inappropriate based on
soil characteristics.
4. Special local resource development issues relative to 15 NCAC 7H
The area of environmental concern that has been identified is the
Perquimans River. The Perquimans Courthouse and other historic struc-
tures in the downtown area are of concern also.
When citizens were asked about the importance of the Town's
historic structures, citizens responding felt that efforts should be made
to protect historic structures such as the courthouse. The Planning
Board felt that the Perquimans River is a natural resource -With, -economic
potential_.and_ that, this resource shoal.d�als_o,.,he_.protected,._ A specific
policy statement on both of these areas was outlined earlier in this
section.
5. Hazardous or fragile land areas
As discussed earlier, tho only hazardous area identified is the
oil storage facility in the downtown waterfront area. The Town will
make every effort possible to assist the owner in finding an adequate
site for this facility in a more appropriate area of the community.
6. Hurricane and flood evacuation needs and plans
Because of Hertford's close proximity to the Perquimans River
and the low, flat characteristics of the land area, the community is
very subject to flooding. The community is therefore covered by the
Perquimans County Hurricane Evacuation Plan. The plan was prepared in
1979 and was updated in May, 1981. Mr. Keith Haskett is the County
Coordinator, with Mr. Talmege Rose of 208 N. Church Street serving as
the Hertford Coordinator. Mr. Rose can be reached at 426-5536 or
426-5514.
27

B. Resource Production and Management Policies
a. Importance: After a review of the existing land use map and a
lengthy discussion during one Planning Board Meeting, it was deter-
mined that commercial forest areas do not exist in Hertford; therefore,
no policy statement needed to be made. However, it is felt that
productive agricultural areas do exist; but due to the present slow
growth in Hertford these areas could be adequately protected with
existing zoning and subdivision regulations.
The Planning Board determined, after discussion with the Mayor,
that mineral productive areas do not exist; and therefore, a policy
statement would not be necessary. The Planning Board felt very strongly
that recreational fishing and commercial fishing is very important to
the Hertford economy. This strong feeling was also reflected in
the results of the planning questionnaire. Specifically, 86.3% of
respondents felt that recreational fishing is very important to the
local economy, with 71.6% indicating that commercial fishing is
important.
Off -road vehicles are primarily a concern at beach locations and
it is not applicable to Hertford. Therefore, a policy statement is
not necessary.
b. Policies
1) Commercial Forest Areas - No policy necessary
2) Productive Agricultural Areas - No policy necessary (adequately
protected.with Zoning and Subdivision Regulations)
3) Mineral Production Areas - No policy necessary
4) Recreational and Commercial Fishing - It shall be the policy
of the Town of Hertford to provide assistance to state and federal
agencies in maintaining and improving the water quality of the
Perquimans River. The Town will also work in conjunction with the
Chamber of Commerce in encouraging more use of the river for
recreational purposes.
5) Off -Road Vehicles - No policy necessary
C. Alternative policies considered: Recreational and Commercial
Fishing
1) Do nothing to manage the Perquimans River as a natural
resource.
2) Provide assistance in every way possible to state and federal
agencies in maintaining and improving the water quality of the
river.
3) Encourage the use of the river by local and visiting fishermen.
m

4) Provide assistance to state and federal agencies in main-
taining and improving the water quality of the Perquimans River.
Work in conjunction with the Chamber of Commerce in encouraging
more use of the river for recreational purposes.
d. Implementation strategy: Recreational and Commercial Fishing
The Plannipg Board feels that recreational fishing has a very
r positive impact on the local economy. They also feel that this
positive impact could be increased with promotional efforts. They
therefore recommend the following implementation strategy to encourage
more recreational fishing.
1) Promote fishing tournaments through the local civic clubs
of Hertford.
2) Participate in the proposed study of water quality in the
Albemarle basin, of which the Perquimans River is a part.
3) Have Chamber of Commerce promote fishing tournaments. Have
Chamber study the feasibility of developing a motel or rooming
house that could serve visiting fishermen as well as the
motoring public traveling through the area.
29

C. Economic and Community Development Policies
a. Importance: When citizens were asked about types and location of
industry, over 90% indicated that the Town should pursue both agri-
culturally -related and technical industries. Many citizens, when
asked what the most critical problem facing Hertford was, indicated
the lack of industry and job opportunities. When asked about
location preference, 49.0% preferred industry to locate within the
Town Limits with 51.0% preferring outside the Town Limits.
When citizens were asked about Town policy on providing services
such as water and sewer to development, 42.1%.indicated that the
Town should not extend water and sewer outside the Town Limits.
38.9% indicated that the Town should extend utilities outside the
Town Limits. However, 33.3% indicated that utilities should only be
extended into areas being annexed, with 24.4% indicating a preference
that if water and sewer is extended outside the Town Limits that
the users in the area requesting the extension pay all the cost. 20.0%
indicated that the Town should pay one-half of the cost with the users
paying one-half the cost.
When citizens were asked about urban growth patterns, 45.6%
indicated that the Town should encourage single family detached housing
development with 19.4% indicating a preference for single family
development on smaller lots. 21.4% preferred apartments, with 6.8%
indicating condominium development. When asked where the Town
should encourage new subdivisions, 53.6% indicated in the extra-
territorial area served by water and sewer. 37.1% preferred inside
the Town Limits. 71.0% of the citizens indicated that the Town
should continue to redevelop older areas of the community. The
Planning Board and Council both feel that this is very important for
Hertford's future if funds are available for such redevelopment.
Concerning commitment to federal and state programs, citizens
indicated a strong interest in pursuing funds with 93.5% indicating
their approval. The Planning Board also felt very strongly that this
should be done, particularly if 100% grants could be secured for
improvement to the community.
Hertford desires to promote tourism as a means to increase the
economic base. Part of the appeal of Hertford is its heritage and
its water -based recreational opportunities on the Perquimans River
and nearby Albemarle Sound.. To promote water -related activities,
the Town must make sure that the river channel is maintained and that
any obstacles to navigation are removed.
Beach nourishment is not applicable to Hertford; therefore, no
policy statement is required.
Although Hertford officials are not aware of any plans to locate
energy facilities within their jurisdiction, the Town must be prepared
to establish policy in the event such a facility is proposed for the
area.
30

Tourism and waterfront access are both issues of great importance
locally, as reflected in the results of the planning questionnaire.
Specifically, 82.7% of citizens responding to the questionnaire
felt that the Town Council should encourage tourism by promoting
the heritage of Hertford. The Planning Board discussed at great
length the desirability of tourism as an additional economic industry.
They felt very strongly that promotion of the heritage of Hertford
could bring about some real economic benefit. Hertford presently
has only one public access for boats. Although this facility has
recently been improved, on many occasions there is not adequate park-
ing for boat trailers.
b. Policies
1) Type and Location of Industry - It shall be the policy of the
Town of Hertford to work with Perquimans County officials and
the Chamber of Commerce in pursuing industry to locate in the
Town of Hertford or in the County. The Town will encourage and pursue
both technical and agriculturally -related industries that the
Town can adequately serve with both water and sewer service needs.
Alternative policies considered:
1. The Town of Hertford could do nothing to promote
industrial development in Hertford.
2. The Town could work toward industrial development by
itself and not work in cooperation with the County in pursuing
more industry.
3. The Town could work in cooperation with the County and
Chamber of Commerce in pursuing industry to locate in the
Town of Hertford or in the County.
Implementation strategy:
1. The Town and County should continue to work closely
with the State in showing the area to as many industrial
prospects as possible.
2. The Town and County should keep an updated list of the
types of industries to be pursued, based on the local
community's ability to serve those industries with the
necessary community facilities.
3. The Town and County should solicit the support of the
private sector in industrial development efforts. Considera-
tion should be given to establishment of a Committee of 100
as has recently been established in Elizabeth City and
established earlier in New Bern, N. C.
2) Providing Services to Development - It shall be the policy of
the Town of Hertford to extend water and sewer outside the Town
31

13
Limits only when the user pays all cost involved, except when
the local governing authority determines the extension to be
beneficial to the community.
Alternative policies considered:
1. Continue to use present policy which is to provide water
and sewer facilities outside Town Limits only if user pays
one-half cost and uses Hertford electric service.
2. Provide water and sewer extension only into areas proposed
for annexation.
3. Provide water and sewer to anyone requesting the extension
if the user pays all cost.
4. Provide water and sewer to anyone requesting with user pay-
ing one-half cost and Town paying one-half cost.
3) Urban Growth Patterns - The Planning Board and Town Council
shall annually review the official zoning map to determine if
any revisions are needed. The Town Council shall encourage
development of apartments and condominiums on remaining in -town
lots that are properly zoned or could be rezoned to permit this
type of development without adversely affecting adjacent property.
The Town shall work to zone the one -mile extraterritorial limit
of Hertford. The Town shall also encourage the County Commissioners
to consider zoning in the area between U.S. 17 and the Newbold -
White House property on the Perquimans River.
Alternative policies considered:
1. Take no action.
2. The Planning Board and Town.Council could utilize existing
zoning regulations to encourage the placement:of different
types of land uses.
3. The Planning Board and Town Council should annually
review the existing zoning map to determine if areas exist
adjacent to existing water and sewer facilities that could be
rezoned to permit a higher density of residential development.
4. The Planning Board and Town Council should encourage apart-
ment and condominium development on remaining in -town lots
that'are considered feasible for this type of development.
Implementation strategy:
1. Request that the County Commissioners review the need to
zone the land adjacent to Church Street extended between the
U.S. 17 Bypass and the Newbold -White House. The purpose of this
32

zoning would be to prevent strip development from taking
place along the entrance road to the historic site and poten-
tial tourist attraction.
2. Meet with local builders and request that they give con-
sideration to building some multi -family housing on in -town
lots.
4) Redevelopment of Developable Areas The Town of Hertford
shall continue to pursue any and all federal or state funds that
are available that can be used in redevelopment of older areas.
The Town shall also continue implementation of a strong minimum
housing code program and encourage owners of property to keep
the property maintained.
Alternative policies considered:
1. Take no action.
2. Continue to pursue any and all federal or state grants that
can be utilized in redevelopment of older areas.
3. Continue implementation of a strong minimum housing code
program and encourage owners of properties to properly maintain
them.
Implementation strategy:
1. Continue enforcement of the minimum housing code and
notify property owners of delapidated structures that they
should be brought up to standard condition or demolished.
2. Apply for Community Development grant funds when they are
available to continue redevelopment efforts in the King Street
area.
5) Commitment to Federal and State Programs - It shall be the
policy of the Town of Hertford to cooperate with state and federal
agencies in the assessment of proposed projects sponsored by such
agencies which will impact directly or indirectly on the residents
of Hertford. Through the A-95 review process the Town will prepare
appropriate comments about any proposed projects, stating their
consistency with locally -adopted policies or plans.
Alternative policies considered:
1. Take no action.
2. Pursue only federal and state grants that require no
local match of funds.
3. Pursue all federal and state funds that can be used to
33

improve the quality of life for Hertford citizens. Contingent
on the financial ability of the Town to provide its local
share if%required.
Implementation strategy:
1. The Town of Hertford will continue to cooperate with
state and federal agencies.
6) Channel Maintenance - It shall be the policy of the Town of Hertford
to cooperate with the Corps of Engineers in their efforts to con-
tinue to maintain the channel in the Perquimans River when necessary,
working with the Corps of Engineers to keep the River accessible
for recreational and commercial uses.
Alternative policies considered:
1. Take no action
2. Continue to cooperate with the Corps of Engineers.
Implementation strategy:
1. Contact Corps of Engineers if maintenance of channel is
required.
2. Contact Corps of Engineers in an effort to have existing
pilings removed along waterfront park site because of their
potential hazard to navigation.
7) Beach Nourishment - No policy necessary.
8) Energy Facility Siting - Hertford officials are not aware of
any plans to locate energy facilities within its jurisdiction.
However, if such a facility should be proposed in the area, the
Town will establish a policy concerning such facility at that time.
Alternative -policies considered:
1. Take no action.
2. Establish policy prior to energy facilities being proposed
for Hertford.
3. Establish policy after reviewing impact of any possible
future energy facilities.
Implementation strategy:
1. Implementation strategy is not needed until or if an
actual energy facility is being considered for Hertford.
9) Tourism - It shall be the policy of the Town of Hertford to
work in cooperation with the Chamber of Commerce and Historic
34

Society in promoting the heritage of Hertford. Through this
effort the Town Council hopes to encourage tourists traveling
through the area to spend time in the community which can have a
positive impact on the local economy.
Alternative policies considered:
1. Take no action.
2. The Town Council, in conjunction with the Chamber of
Commerce and other interested groups, will promote tourism
through the promotion of the heritage of Hertford.
3. The Town Council will work with the Chamber of Commerce
in promoting recreational fishing wherever possible.
4. The Town Council will encourage and promote development
.of a motel or tourist home to serve the needs of tourists
visiting the area.
Implementation strategy:
1. Have historic and architecturally significant homes
placed on the National Register.
2. Establish walking tour of historic district and coordinate
efforts with Historic Society now working on Newbold -White House.
3. Prepare walking tour brochure showing homes of architectural
or historical significance.
4. Promote annual open house of historic homes.
10) Waterfront Access - Because the Perquimans River is a major
natural resource for recreational opportunities, it shall be the
policy of the Town of Hertford to provide as much waterfront
access to citizens as financially feasible for the Town.
Alternate policies considered:
1. The Town of Hertford could elect to take no action.
2. The Town could elect to provide as much waterfront access
as financially feasible.
Implementation strategy:
1. The Town should follow the recommendation made in the
1978 Recreation and Open Space Plan pertaining to waterfront
„ access facilities.
2. The Town should continue work to complete the RUD water -
based recreational facility as soon as possible.
35

D. Continuing Public Participation Policy
1. Discussion of means by which public participation in planning matters
was encouraged in planning update process.
The Planning Board determined after discussion of several alternatives
to use a planning questionnaire that addressed the issues being considered
in the plan. Over 500 questionnaires were distributed throughout the
community. Specifically, copies were available from the utility office,
Chamber of Commerce and several banks and downtown business establishments.
2. Means to be used for public education on planning issues.
The public will be informed on planning issues through articles in
the local news media and through presentations at civic clubs.
3. Policy: Continued citizen involvement in planning process.
It shall be the policy of the Town of Hertford to continue to give
citizens an opportunity to be involved in local planning for the future.
The Town will therefore annually review these policy statements and
implementation strategy. An evaluation will also be made on an annual
basis to see if progress is being made and to request additional
input from citizens on progress being made.
E. Policies on Other Local Issues
1, Second Home Development - One issue the Coastal Resources Commission
requested Hertford to address was that of second home development. The
Town of Hertford does not have any second home developments and none are
anticipated; therefore, a policy statement on this subject is not necessary
at this time.
36

Chapter IV Land Classification
A. Introduction
A land classification system has been developed by the North Carolina
Coastal Resources Commission as a means of assisting in the implementation
of the policies developed within local CAMA Land Use Plans, such as this
one. By showing land classifications on a map and describing them in
narrative form, the Town of Hertford specifies those areas where the policies
described in the policy section will apply. It should also be noted that the
various land classifications also show areas which come under the purview of
various state and federal statutes and regulations. (See "Current Plans
and Policies".) Although certain areas are outlined on the Land Classification
Map, it must be remembered that land classification is merely a tool to help
implement policies and not a strict regulatory mechanism.
B. Description of Land Classification System
The land classification system for the coastal area and Hertford
consists of five classes listed as follows:
1. Developed
a. 'Purpose: The purpose of the developed class is to provide for
continued intensive development and redevelopment of existing cities.
b. Description: Areas to be classified developed include lands
currently developed for urban purposes at or approaching a density
of 500 dwellings per square mile that are provided with usual municipal
or public services including at least public water, sewer, recrea-
tional facilities, police and fire protection. Areas which exceed
the minimum density but which do not have public sewer service may
best be divided into a separate class to indicate that although
they have a developed character, they will need sewers in the future.
2. Transition
a. Purpose: The purpose of the transition class is to provide for
future intensive urban development within the ensuing ten years on
lands that are most suitable and that will be scheduled for provision
of necessary public utilities and services. The transition lands also
provide for additional growth when additional lands in the developed
class are not available or when they are severely limited for
development.
b. Description:
.� ( i ) Lands to be classified transition may include: (1) lands
currently having urban services, and (2) other land necessary to
accommodate the urban population and economic growth anticipated within
the planning jurisdiction over the ensuing ten-year period.
37

(ii) Lands classified transition to help meet the demand for
developable anticipated population and economic growth must: (1)
be served or be readily served by public water, sewer, and other
urban services including public streets, and (2) be generally free
of severe physical limitations for urban development. In addition,
the Transition class should not include: (1) lands of high potential
for agriculture, forestry, or mineral extraction, or land falling
within extensive rural areas being managed commercially for these
uses, when other lands are available; (2) lands where urban develop-
ment might result in major or irreversible damage to important
environmental, scientific, or scenic values or (3) land where urban
development might result in damage to natural systems or processes
of more than local concern. Lands where development will result in
undue risk to life or property from natural hazards (including inlet
hazard areas and ocean erodible areas as defined in 15 NCAC 7H.) or
existing land uses shall not be classified Transition.
(iii) If any designated area of environmental concern is
classified transition, an explanation shall be included stating why
the area is felt to be appropriate for high density development.
(iv) In determining the amount of additional transition lands
necessary to meet projected urban population and economic growth, the
county may utilize estimates of average future urban population density
that are based upon local land policy, existing patterns and trends
of urban development within the county, and densities specified in
local zoning, if any; and estimate of additional Transition class
lands should be based upon a guideline density of 2,000 persons or
500 dwellings per square mile.
3. Community
a. Purpose: The purpose of the community class is to provide for
clustered land development to help meet housing, shopping, employment
and public service needs within the rural areas of,the county.
b. Description: Lands to be classified community are those areas
within the rural areas of planning jurisdictions characterized by a
small grouping of mixed land uses (residences, general store, church,
school, etc.), and which are suitable and appropriate for small
clusters of rural development not requiring municipal sewer service.
4. Rural
a. Purpose: The purpose of the rural class is to provide for
agriculture, forest management, mineral extraction and other low
intensity uses. Residences may be located within "rural" areas where
urban services are not required and where natural resources will not
be permanently impaired.
b. Description: Lands that can be identified as appropriate for
resource management and allied uses include lands with high potential
for agriculture, forestry, or mineral extraction; lands with one or
more limitations that would make development costly and hazardous;
J

�S�YiColG"'1` r-

and lands containing irreplaceable, limited, or significant natural,
recreational or scenic resources not otherwise classified.
5. Conservation
a. Purpose: The purpose of the conservation class is to provide
for effective.long-term'management of significant limited or
irreplaceable areas. This management may be needed because of its
natural, cultural, recreational, productive or scenic values. These
areas should not be identified as transition lands in the future.
b. Description: The conservation class should be applied to lands
that contain: major wetlands; essentially undeveloped shorelands that
are unique, fragile, or hazardous for development; necessary wildlife
habitat or areas that have a high probability for providing necessary
habitat conditions; publicly -owned watersupply watersheds and aquifers;
and forest lands that are undeveloped and will remain undeveloped for
commercial purposes.
C. Land Classifications for Hertford
1. Developed
The majority of land in Hertford has been classified developed since
water and sewer services are available throughout town. Specifically,
all of the Town between the Perquimans River and Gennies Gut and the
.western Town limits is classified developed. The only exception is the
low wooded area on the northwestern Town boundary line next to the rail-
road tracks which is classified Conservation.
The area north and south of Church Street from Castleton Creek to the
eastern side of U.S. 17 Bypass at Church Street is included in this
classification. All areas east and west of Edenton Road are included
with the exception of two areas adjacent to Castleton Creek which are in
transition. The area on the north and south side of Wynne Fork Road
from Edenton Road to the east side of the U.S. 17 Bypass and including
all of the public housing site is also included.
2. Transition
The Land Classification Map shows six areas in the transition category.
The areas adjacent to the western Town boundary and on the north and
south side of Grubb Street are included in the transition category. This
was included because of the area's close proximity to existing water
and sewer lines located in Grubb Street. Also, as discussed in the soil
section of the report, this area has the best soil characteristics for
urban development. The two areas located on the western side of
Castleton Creek were included because of available utilities adjacent to
this area, favorable soil characteristics for urban development, and the
fact that this area is already in an area where expansion of housing sites
is taking place as shown on the Existing Land Use Changes Map discussed
in an earlier section.
The area north and south of Church Street east of Castleton Creek
39

Bridge has been included because of current development taking place in
this area, availability of utilities to the area and the fact that this
is the major access point to Hertford from the U.S. 17 Bypass.
3. Rural
The areas shown as rural are primarily the areas west of the Town
limits. These areas are used extensively for agricultural production
with some scattered rural housing. Also included is the area adjacent '
to U.S. 17 from the Bypass bridge to Wynne Fork Road._
4. Conservation
There are four areas of Hertford shown in the conservation category.
The first area is the low wooded area on the western edge of Hertford's
Town limits and adjacent to the railroad tracks. The second area is the
low wooded area north of the S bridge and adjacent to the Winfall_ Town
limits. The third area is the low wooded area west of,'-C st_leton Crew.,
south of Church Street and east side of Gennies Gut up to Hyde�ark Road.
The last area is the band of low wooded area on the eastern side of
Castleton Creek.
40

i
.I
I
LAND CLASSIFICATION MAP
n
Perqu(mons
River
DEVELOPED D
TRANSITIOi1
COMMUNITY
L_!Aj
RURAL R
JGGGG� '
CONSERVATION ;� `
All surface waters
are included in the OK
Conservation area
The preparation of this map was financed in j
part through a grant provided by the North /
Carolina Coastal Management Program, through /
funds provided by*the Coastal Zone Management /
Act of 1972, as amended, which is administered
by the Office of. Coastal Zone Management, /
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
X

Chapter V Synopsis
A. Purpose of Land Development Plan
The Town of Hertford prepared a Land Use Plan in 1976 in response to the
Coastal Area Management Act passed by the North Carolina Legislature in 1974.
The purpose and intent of the act is best described in Section .0101 "Intro-
duction to Land Use Planning" Subchapter 7B - Land Use Planning Guidelines
( as amended 9/1/79) :
.0101 Introduction
(a) The Coastal Area Management Act of 1974 establishes a cooperative
program of coastal area management between local governments and the
state. Land use planning lies at the center of local government's
involvement, as it gives the local leaders an opportunity and respon-
sibility to establish and enforce policies and guide the development
of their community.
(b) The purpose of the state guidelines is to assist local governments in
each of the 20 coastal counties and municipalities within those counties
with the preparation of their own individual land use plans. Each
county and the municipalities within the coastal counties are
encouraged to develop a plan which reflects the desires, needs and
the best judgement of its citizens. The land use plans prepared
under these guidelines, when considered together, form the basis for
a "comprehensive plan for the protection, preservation, orderly
development and management of the coastal area of North Carolina,"
which is the primary objective of the Coastal Area Management Act of
1974.
Further in the guidelines in Section .0201 (c), the heart of why North
Carolina communities and counties need to prepare land use plans is described.
.0201 Introduction
(c) Local governments, through the land use planning process, address
issues and adopt policies that guide the development of their
community. Many decisions affecting development are made by other
levels of government, and local policies must take account of and
coincide with established state and federal policies. Most decisions,
however, are primarily of local concern. By carefully and explicitly
addressing these issues, other levels of government will follow
local policies that deal with these issues. Policies which consider
the type of development to be encouraged, the density and patterns
of development, and the methods of providing beach access are examples
of these local policy decisions.
More significant even than the "requirement" that communities prepare
Land Use Plans every five years is the uses that are made of the local plans
once they have been completed. In the publication, The Impact of State Regula-
tion of Coastal Land In North Carolina, prepared by Charles D. Liner of the
Institute of Government in Chapel Hill, he noted the impact of local land use
plans on state and federal decisions:
...Land -use plans have a potential effect on (local) land use because:
(a) CAMA permits may not be issued for development that is
41

inconsistent with land -use plans (since CAMA permits are
required only in AECs, this effect is limited to land
within AECs).
(b) Local ordinances and regulations that apply to AECs must be
consistent with the land -use plan; local ordinances and
regulations affecting land outside AECs are subject to
review by the Coastal Resources Commission, which is autho-
rized to recommend modifications to the local government.
(c) Federal actions involving grants, licenses, permits, and
development projects must be consistent with local land -
use plans, as required by Section 307 of the FCZMA.
(d) In accordance with the Governor's Executive Order Number 15,
certain state agency actions and policies must be consistent
with land -use plans.
Over and above the requirements of the CAMA act and the uses of local plans
by state and federal permitting agencies, the local land use plan can provide
local elected and appointed officials and the citizenry an opportunity to
evaluate where they are and where they want to be.
It can be stated that the main purpose for updating the Hertford Land
Development Plan is so that all issues related to economic and physical develop-
ment can be discussed and a plan prepared which will provide a guideline for the
future growth and development of the community.
B. Major Changes Since Last Plan
Although Hertford did not prepare its own land use plan in 1976, the Town
was included in the plan prepared for Perquimans County. As part of that
plan, several goals were established for the Town of Hertford which included
the following:
1. Establishment of an inspection department for housing
2. Enforcement of the building code
3. Work toward alleviation of poor housing conditions
4. Provide more public boating access facilities
5. Provide more scenic overlooks
6. Consider establishment of an historic district
7. Seek more industry to create more job opportunities
All of the goals established in 1976 and listed above have been implemented
or are in the process of implementation.
The plan called for establishment of an inspection department which has
now been established. The plan also called for enforcement of the building
code with periodic building inspection. This has been an on -going process
since _establishment of the inspection department, with several structures `
being either demolished or renovated since 1976. The plan also called for
alleviation of problem areas in the Town such as poor housing. This has been
accomplished through a Community Development Block Grant that was received in
1977. The provision of more public boat facilities and scenic outlooks was
called for. The Town has completed one part of this objective by redevelop-
ment of an existing boat ramp utilizing a Soil Conservation Grant and Coastal
42

Plains Supplemental Grant. The Town is also in the process of developing a
water -based recreation facility on the Perquimans River that will serve as
a passive and active recreation facility and scenic outlook.
The desirability of establishing an historic district and supporting
the promotion of tourism was recommended. Shortly after completion of the
1976 Land Use Plan, the Town, in cooperation with the County, arranged to
have Archives and History staff members prepare a detail analysis of
existing historic structures located in the Town and County. This informa-
tion will be published in the near future and can be used in establishing
a local historic district.
Seeking more industry was of great concern in the 1976 Land Use Plan.
Since 1976, the Town of Hertford, in cooperation with the County, has
worked hard to recruit new industry. The Town, through its efforts, has been
designated by the Governor as a Community of Excellence.
C. New Policies
Prior to development of this 1980 Land Use Plan, the Town of Hertford
did not have a written policy on extension of water and sewer facilities
outside the Town limits. During this planning process the Mayor, Planning
Board and Town Council have established a written policy on utility extensions.
The Town also now has a written policy and implementation strategy for
development of a tourist industry in Hertford to enhance the image of the
community and to hopefully provide additional job opportunities.
The following policies have been established for the Town of Hertford:
1. Resource Protection AECs (Estuarine Waters and Public Trust Waters) -
The Town of Hertford shall have a policy to do all in its power to protect
public rights for navigation and recreation and to assist Federal and
State agencies in preserving and managing the public trust waters and
estuarine waters in an effort to safeguard and perpetuate their biological,
economic and aesthetic value.
2. Resource Protection AECs (Estuarine Shorelines) - The Town of Hertford
shall have a policy to ensure shoreline development is compatible with
both the dynamic nature of estuarine shorelines and the values of the
estuarine system.
3. Recreational and Commercial Fishing - It shall be the policy of the
Town of Hertford to provide assistance to state and federal agencies in
maintaining and improving the water quality of the Perquimans River. The
Town will also work in conjunction with the Chamber of Commerce in
encouraging more use of the river for recreational purposes.
4. Type and Location of Industry - It shall be the policy of the
Town of Hertford to work with Perquimans County officials and the Chamber
of Commerce in pursuing industry to locate in the Town of Hertford or in
the County. The Town will encourage and pursue both technical and agri-
culturally -related industries that the Town can adequately serve with
both water and sewer service needs.
43

5. Providing Services to Development - It shall be the policy of the
Town of Hertford to extend water and sewer outside the Town Limits only
when the user pays all cost involved, except when the local governing
authority determines the extension to be beneficial to the community.
6. Urban Growth Patterns - The Planning Board and Town Council shall W
annually review the official zoning map to determine if any revisions are
needed. The Town Council shall encourage development of apartments and
condominiums on remaining in -town lots that are properly zoned or
could be rezoned to permit this type of development without adversely
affecting adjacent property. The Town shall work to zone the, one-mile
extraterritorial limit of Hertford. The Town shall also encourage the
County Commissioners to consider zoning in the area between U.S. 17 and
the Newbold -White House property on the Perquimans River.
7. Redevelopment of Developable Areas - The Town of Hertford shall
continue to pursue any and all federal or state funds that are available
that can be used in redevelopment of older areas. The Town shall also
continue implementation of a strong minimum housing code program and
encourage owners of property to keep the property maintained.
8. Commitment to Federal and State Programs = It shall be the policy
of the Town of Hertford to cooperate with state and federal agencies in
the assessment of proposed projects sponsored by such agencies which
will impact directly or indirectly on the residents of Hertford. Through
the A-95 review process the Town will prepare appropriate comments
about any proposed projects, stating their consistency with locally -
adopted policies or plans.
9. Channel Maintenance - It shall be the policy of the Town of Hertford
to cooperate with the Corps of Engineers in their efforts to continue to
maintain the channel in the Perquimans River when necessary, working with
the Corps of Engineers to keep the River accessible.for recreational
and commercial uses.
10. Energy Facility Siting - Hertford officials are not aware of any
plans to locate energy facilities within its jurisdiction. However, if
such a facility should be proposed in the area, the Town will establish
a policy concerning such facility at that time.
11. Tourism - It shall be the policy of the Town of Hertford to work in
cooperation with the Chamber of Commerce and Historic Society in promoting
the heritage of Hertford. Through this effort the Town Council hopes to
encourage tourists traveling through the area to spend time in the
community which can have a positive impact on the local economy.
12. Waterfront Access - Because the Perquimans River is a major natural
resource for recreational opportunities, it shall be the policy of the
Town of Hertford to provide as much waterfront access to citizens as '
financially feasible for the Town.
44

13. Second Home Development - One issue the Coastal Resources Commission
requested Hertford to address was that of second home development. The
Town of Hertford does not have any second home developments and none are
anticipated; therefore, a policy statement on this subject is not necessary
y at this time.
• D. Conclusions
The land use plan is a framework that will guide local leaders as they
make decisions affecting development. Private individuals and other levels
of government will also use the plan to guide their land use decisions. Use
of the plan by these groups will lead to the more efficient and economical
provision of public services, the protection of natural resources, sound
economic development, and the protection of public health and safety.
45