HomeMy WebLinkAboutShoreline Access Study-1980e
.•
DCM COPY'-- DCM COPY
Please do not remove!!!!!
Division of Coastal Management Copy
TOWN OF CAPE CARTERET
SHORELINE ACCESS STUDY
MAY 1980
COASTAL CONSULTANTS, LTD.
l�
SHORELINE ACCESS STUDY
Prepared by
COASTAL CONSULTANTS, Ltd.
Southern Pines, NC
AND
TOWN OF CAPE CARTERET
Cape Carteret,NC
The preparation of this report was financed in part throug
h
•
9
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
PART
I
INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
1
PART
II
LOCAL SETTING
2
PART
III
SHORELINE ACCESS PROBLEMS
3
PART
IV
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
4
PART
V
INVENTORY OF EXISTING FACILITIES
6
.PART
VI
SHORELINE ACCESS NEEDS
10
PART
VII
RECOMMENDATIONS
12
BIBLIOGRAPHY
APPENDICES
A STATE POLICIES AND STANDARDS RELATING A_1
TO SHORELINE ACCESS
B TOOLS FOR ACQUIRING SHORELINE ACCESS B-1
C FUNDING SOURCES FOR SHORELINE ACCESS C-1
MAPS
Cape Carteret Existing Access Points
Emerald Isle Existing Access Points
• PART I: INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
In March, 1979, the Coastal Resources Commission of the State of North
Carolina (CRC), adopted policies relating specifically to public beach access.
(Appendix A ). In addressing policies, the CRC was required to comply with
federal regulations requiring coastal states to consider both physical and
visual access. Although both the federal and state governments and their
respective agencies and commissions are responsible for concerning themselves
with public beach access, it is the decision of the North Carolina CRC that pro-
vision of access is a local concern to be expressed through local plans.
Public access to the shoreline is also addressed in the Statewide Com-
prehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan of North Carolina. This report states that
it is an objective of the State that areas of public access be provided along the
shores of streams, rivers, lakes, estuaries, sounds, and the ocean in order that
citizens and visitors may be able to reach and use inland waters and the ocean.
The problem of public access is a difficult one due to the interaction with
one of the most complex and emotional concerns of the people of our nation, pro-
perty rights.
The beach access is a definite part of the recreational objectives of the
Town of Cape Carteret. Through this plan, the town can identify areas of re-
creational improvements and methods to carry out these improvements.
E
• PART II: LOCAL SETTING
The Town of Cape Carteret is located on Bogue Sound on Mainland Carteret
County. The Town has experienced a steady growth in population since its in-
corporation in 1957. Then it had a year-round population of about 52, now the
population has increased to about 1250 persons.
Cape Carteret is basically a residential community with limited commercial
services to serve the community rather than to provide an economic base.
Cape Carteret is located in White Oak Township, but is connected to the
Bogue Banks (Town of Emerald Isle) by the Cameron Langston Bridge. The Town
is divided east to west by NC 24. The northern section of the town contains a
loop road with development around Star Hill Golf. Course. The'southern 'section
is a somewhat older development on a grid pattern which is sectioned into two
portions by Deer Creek (Rocky Run).
-2-
• PART III: SHORELINE ACCESS PROBLEMS
As the Town of Cape Carteret continues to grow, more and more concern is
expressed by the residents about the problem of finding easy accessibility to
the ocean beach. The Townhas boat launch facilities on Bogue Sound and is
close to access on the White Oak River provided by the North Carolina Wildlife
Commission and the U.S. Forest Service. TheTo wn however, is in a frustrating
position of being within 1 3/4 miles to the ocean, directly next to a bridge to
Bogue Banks, and having no parking area available to residents of Cape Carteret
near the ocean beach in reasonable proximity to the Town of Cape Carteret.
Furthermore, the Bogue Inlet Point has historically been an area of great scenic
value to residents of Cape Carteret. The lack of parking and the sale of private
residential lots in the area continues to 'worsen the public access problem.
In many areas, people wish to get to the oceanfront but must cross private
• property to reach the shoreline. Right-of-ways that are supposed to provide ac-
cess are often not identified and are sometimes partially or wholly controlled
by adjacent property owners by fences.
Even when the public is able to get to the ocean beach, problems arise from
lack of parking areas and the degree to which the public has any landward rights
during times of high tide.
Broadly speaking, the State owns the beach seaward of the mean high tide line
(wetsand) but the beach above the mean high tide line (dry sand and upland) is in
private ownership.
There are a number of mechanisms under traditional property law in North
Carolina by which the public can acquire rights of access across the upland por-
tions of the beach. These mechanisms are included in Appendix B.
-3-
• PART IV: GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Goals and Objectives:
The Town of Cape Carteret organized a joint committee of the Mayor, com—
missioners and the planning board to -participate in determining goals and ob-
jectives and areas of concentration in the preparation of the beach access
plan. The following goals and objectives were adopted:
A. To obtain public parking facilities to accommodate property owners
of the Town of Cape Carteret.
B. To cooperate with and coordinate programs with other communities,
the State and the Federal Governments
C. To explore all possible implementation strategies to acquire and
develop beach access.
• Public Participation:
The joint committee formulated a questionnaire to determine public atti-
tudes toward recreational facilities and public access. Some of the questions
related to priorities while others probed policies and willingness to pay. The
respondents were selected by a scientific random sampling procedure from a list
of Cape Carteret taxpayers. The sample size was selected to obtain an 85% con-
fidence level. Taxpayers who were also Town residents were interviewed by tele-
phone by members of the committee. Others were contacted by mail.
Below is a list of questions and responses -
Beach Access
Areas such as Cape Carteret, which are close to beach areas, but have no
public land on the beach, often are in a situation which is frustrating
to residents.
• Does Cape Carteret need parking facilities close to
Ocean access points on Emerald Isle?
(50%) Yes (37%) No (5%) No Opinion
-4-
• Questions and responses (continued)
Perhaps it may be determined that the only way to achieve proper
access and parking at Emerald Isle is to purchase land, build and
maintain a parking lot for residents of the Town of Cape Carteret.
If the financing was through bonds or the general tax revenues,
would you be willing to pay an additional ten cents ($.10) per
$100 of assessed valuation per year?
(42%) Yes (53%) No (5%) No Opinion
If another method were available (such as paying a yearly fee
for a parking pass) would you pay $25 per year?
(42%) Yes (54%) No (4%) No Opinion
Would you pay more if necessary? (16%) Yes (70%) No
• If yes, how much more? $50
If an area solution to the access and parking problem is not
available, should the Town of Cape Carteret try to gain access
on its own? (41%) Yes (47%) No (12%) No Opinion
Q
-5-
• PART V: INVENTORY OF EXISTING FACILITIES
Below is an inventory of shoreline access facilities which are within
about ten minutes driving time from Cape Carteret. Only free access sites
which are available to the public are listed. Other commercial areas such
as campgrounds, motels or hotels are not listed, nor are private lands which
are often used by the public without permission.
Cedar Point Boat Access Area
This area is leased by the North Carolina Wildlife Commission. The
access area is located on the White Oak River. Parking capacity is twenty
cars, with one ramp for boat launching.
Cedar Point Recreation Area
The U.S. Forest Service maintains a boat launch facility on the White Oak
River with a parking capacity of thirty cars. It is also a cartop launch site,
has camping facilities, picnicking, nature observation, scenic vista and has
public restrooms. The ramp, however, is not adequate for most boats.
Bogue Fishing Pier
The pier is on the Atlantic Ocean on the Bogue Banks. Parking is available
for thirty cars. Public restrooms are available, Emerald Isle lifeguards are
at the area during swimming season. Fishing is available from the pier for a
fee.
Road End at Bogue Inlet
The road end at Bogue Inlet has ORV access and is a scenic vista. Swimming
is available on the public portion of the beach. There are no parking facilities.
Emerald Isle Easements
These easements on Bogue Banks are restricted to local residents and no
parking along the -streets is permitted.
MM
Cape Carteret Boat Launch Areas
Two boat access sites give Cape Carteret residents boat access
to the Sound. The areas are located between Dolphin and
Manatee Streets in the Cape Carteret subdivision, and on
Bayshore Drive in the Bayshore subdivision. The areas have
picnic tables, parking and concrete ramp facilities. The Town
leases the areas from a developer for $1.00 per year on a ten
year lease arrangement. Docks are not provided by the Town.
Individuals must make private arrangements with the developer
for dock facilities.
Other Potential Access
The Town has.a number of streets which end on the Sound. The
following streets have been dedicated to the Town, and.offer
• potential future access sites: Bonita St., Manatee St., Anita
Forte Dr., Dolphin St., Holly Lane, Bay Shore Dr., Bogue Sound
Dr., and Easy St.
11
-7-
rx�
ROGUE
INLET
x
Bowe Point
AREAS OF PUBLIC ACCESS IN
E MALD ISLE Z
80GUE SOUND
Fishing Pier
Emerald Isle Easements
ATLANTIC OCEAN
• PART VI: SHORELINE ACCESS NEEDS
Review of existing access sites reveals that the greatest need in terms
of shoreline access is transportation related. Public access points are of
little value if transportation facilities are not available. Parking space
for cars requires about 200 square ft. per car. Also, additional area is
needed for turnaround space and other facilities such as trash cans, dumpsters,
etc. Shoreline property is generally quite expensive and therefore difficult
to obtain for such uses as parking lots. Furthermore, zoning restrictions
often make it difficult to provide for parking facilities in residential dis-
tricts. Many communities do not allow street parking, eliminating another me-
thod of parking near public access points.
The Town of Cape Carteret has shoreline access difficulties on both the
sound and the ocean.
Increase in Demands
By the Year 2000, the population of Cape Carteret is anticipated to about
double from its present estimated population of 1250. Trends of increasing in-
come, population and more leisure time appear to be placing more and more demands
upon recreational facilities. Greater vacation home and commercial development
of shoreline areas will remove open areas and continue to make public access
more and more difficult. As tourism is promoted, the available space for local
residents decreases. Although recreation standards are difficult to apply to a
small town, the following could be applied in terms of shoreline access:
Boat access areas and marinas One-half acre/thousand population
Ocean waterfront parks
Estaurine waterfront parks
Visual enhancement areas
—10—
Two acres/thousand population
One acre/thousand population
One-half acre/thousand population
•
Opportunities for the Handicapped
In the Town of Cape Carteret* the parking areas near the boat
launch sites offer access to those on wheelchairs for scenic use,
10 since the area is flatv and grassy or paved. However# places for
fishing should be provided (low rails and barriers to allow both
closeness to Dhe water and safety. Protective rails should be
installed to protect the blind from danger near the water's edge.
Any recreation areas on the ocean beach should have planked
walkways for access bu wheelchair (planks should not be gapped).
Public recreation programs established in connection with beach access
should provide boat rides# tours, fishing etc. for the handicapped.
If a bus or van is considered to transport persons to Emerald Isle
for ocean access# the vehicles should have accomodations for the
handicapped•
• For the Town of Cape Carteret, the standards would apply as
follows:
is
Year
1980
Year
2000
Boat access areas and marinas
.63
acres
1.10
acres
Ocean waterfront parks
2.51
acres
4.42
acres
Estaurine waterfront parks
1.26
acres
2.21
acres
Visual enhancement areas
.63
acres
1.10
acres
Total
5.03
acres
8.83
acres
The greatest need for the
Town of Cape
Carteret appears
to be in
the area
of formal parks and associated
parking.
—11—
• PART VII: RECWv,,,VENJATI0NS
Sound Access
The Town should esquire Town owned wound parks and facilities.
Present arrangements with developers for leasing two boat launch
areas should be thought of as a "stopgap" measure. As development
pressure increases in the Town, areas presently under lease may
be developed by the owner. Furthermore, the small parking areas
and the few picnic tables will have to be increased. Also, the
Town needs to consider rest room facilities for the -park users.
As boating interest continues to increase, the Town should
also consider public docks as part of the marina developments.
The Town should establish Public access areas at the ends
of dedicated streets for scenic vistas, picnicing, and fishing.
• Small parking areas should be designated along these access points.
Ocean Access
The focal point for Cape Carteret residents for ocean access is Bogue
Point. This area has historically been of interest to the public due to
its vantage on the ocean and the White Oak River, making it an area of
valuable visual vista. Furthermore, the area is close to the Town of Cape
Carteret residents by virtue of the Cameron Langston Bridge.
Due to the recent actions of the Town of Emerald Isle, the public is
no longer allowed to park on the streets near the point. Although public
access is available at the end of Bogue Street, lack of public parking vir-
tually prohibits intensive public use of the point.
—12—
The Corps of Engineers is studying Bogue Inlet and beach erosion problems
on several miles of Emerald Isle oceanfront. It is possible that the Corps
• would require public access in connection with any improvements made by the Corps.
Should this not occur in a method or time period which is satisfactory,
the Town of Cape Carteret could determine a course of action to provide access
for Town residents. Presently, the Town of Emerald Isle's zoning ordinance
does not permit the establishment of parking areas in residential zones. The
Bogue Point is in a residential zone. The ordinance does, however, permit a
park, a residential zone.
Restrictive covenants on lots in the area also present
a problem, although courts often have found these covenants
to be invalid. Of probably greater restriction, however, is the
social pressure regarding the Point. Legal actions by the Town
of Cape Carteret to obtain access on the Point would be looked
upon very unfavorably by Emerald Isle residents.
• Alternatives for Ocean Access
A& Direct purchase of land b.)� the Town of Cape Carteret
on Bogue Point for the establishment of a "park" which
would consist.priTarily of parking.,
Many lots are available for.a price of about $17,000.00
each. The Town could acquire through fee simple purchase
-a lot or lots to provide parking, picnic tables, etc.
for Cape Carteret residents. It appears to be legal to
do so, although case law is sparse on such subjects in
North Carolina, In Martin County vs Halifax County,
(178 NO 26), it was determined that a county could purchase
land .in another County for a bridge connection. Iri cases
like these, most lawyers agree that such judgement world
be even more liberally construed in the case of towns&
-13-
Of course, the question of restrictive covenants would be
• an important consideration, as well as the unpopularity of
such an action.
Be The residents of the Town of Cape Carteret could create
a recreation non-profit corporation. The corporation
could purchase lots in Emerald Isle and develop a park.
C. The Town of Cape Carteret could establish lease agreements
with private businesses in Emerald Isle to use parking
and access areas.
D. The Town of Cape Carteret could purchase, lease or rent
a small bus or van to commute Cape Carteret citizens to
public access at Bogue Point.
Be The Town of Cape Carteret could acquire commercially zoned
lots in the Town of Emerald Isle for the purpose of a parking
• lot and/or associated park.
Consistency With CAMA
Although the Bogue Point area is zoned residential,
the area around Bouge Point is an AEC and is therefore
subject to State regulation. The area is classified as an
AEC Inlet iAmd. Inlet lands are lands adjacent to inlets
having demonstrated a tendency or a probability of migrating
along the Outer Banks, The AEC is defined using the past
history of action of the inlet. The location of the.inlet is
` —14—
• often a temporary one, such channels are often subject to considerable
migzation. Coastal inlet lands are therefore, extremely
dynamic land areas that are highly susceptible to becoming
displaced by water. Highest priority shall be given to
uses that do not involve the construction of !substr.,ntial
structures.
Although lands along Bouge Inlet are being offered
for sale as residential property, it is apparent that
it would be unlikely that a permit would be issuen for
a residential r.3tructure on the point. Furthermore, the
use of the area as a park would be consistent with the
AEC Inlet Lands priorities, as well as with the Town
of Emerald Isle's zoning ordinance which provides an
0 overlay district for these areas.
s
Funding
The most common source of funding for acquiring lands
for access to public beaches and other recreation projects
is the US Department of the Interior's Land and Water
Conservation Fund.(LAWCON) This source provides monies for
acquisition of land for federally administered parks and
matching grants for state planning of recreation, and state
or local land acquisition or development. The LAWCON is
managed by the Heritage Conservation and Recreation service
and can provide a program for acquisition and development
grants which may be used for projects. Funds are awarded
•if communities meet conditions and provide 50% matching funds.
Potezii-:dl funding sources are di-3cussed in Appendix C.
—15—
• Potential Costs
The.major'cost associated with the establishment of
a park on Emerald Isle is that of the land acquisition -and
the paving of a parking lot. Parking, turn areas and a small
area for picnic tables and refuse containers would require
the purchase of two lots for a total of about $40,000.00,
This would allow parking for about ?5 cars. Paving for this
area would amount to about $15#000,00, A-n additional $5,000.00
might be needed for other costs(legal, administrative and
contingencies) The total cost of $ 60,000,00 could be lessened
by a 50% grant from LAWCON. The local share would then be
$3090OO.0O. This could be financed with a general obligation
bond and paid for through local taxes or the sale of parking
stickers and fees collected at the site.
Another possibility would be the purchase of a small
bus or van to take residents to the beach. A small bus
can be purchased for about $15,000.00. Drivers could be
volunteers or paid a salary amounting to about $8,000.00
for the season. A lot large enough for parking in Cape Carteret
could be purchased for about $15000.00. It could be paved
for about $ Z5,OOO.0O.
There are 3y other areas in the Town of Emerald Isle which-
--a re zoned for commeraia development and could be considered
close enough to the Ocean for beach access. These areas are
1) the water slide area on Islander Drive 2) the McLean property
off Reed Drive in the vicinity 'of Islander Drive;'
and 3) property at the end of Mangrove Drive in the vicinity
of the Emerald Island Pier.
•
The parcel on Islander Drive has a total of 2.6 acres. It
includes a paved area of 61,040 sq. ft. with a building which
could be used for public facilities. Public access to the beach
is available. The entire parcel sells for approximately $220,000.00.
The owner is willing to work out various financial arrangements.
The owner is willing to break up the parcel into three pieces
and sell any or all of them. The areas are as followss Area
A, 219800 sq. ft. for $35,000.00 area B, 309000 sq. ft. for
$55,000.00 and area C, 61,040 sq* ft. for $160000.00.
The area off Reed Drive, about one half mile east of Islander
Drive offers= another possibility for a municipal park. An area
perhaps five acres could be purchased for about $3009000.00. The
area could used for both parking and and park facilities.
Another area, near the Emerald Isle Pier, has lots zoned
commercial which are owned by a number of individuals. There is
a possibility that a lot or number of lots could be purchased
or leased. An acre lot in the -'area could sell for about $40,000.00
—17—
C�1
APPENDIX A
NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL RESOURCES COMMISSION
SHORELINE ACCESS POLICIES
(a) Development shall not interfere with the public's right of access
to the shorefront where acquired through public acquisition, dedication, or
customary use as established by the courts.
(b) The responsibility of insuring that the public can obtain adequate
access to public trust resources or the ocean, sound, rivers and tributaries
is primarily that of local governments to be shared and assisted by state and
federal government.
(c) Public beach area projects funded by the state and federal govern-
ment will not receive initial or additional funds unless provisions are made
• for adequate public access. This must include access rights, adequate identifi-
cation and adequate parking. (See Erosion Projects Funds, 1979 General Assembly)
(d) Policies regarding state and federal properties with shorefront areas
intended to be used by the public must encourage, permit and provide public access
and adequate parking so as to achieve maximum public use and benefit of these
areas consistent with establishing legislation.
(e) State and Federal funds for beach access will be provided only to lo-
calities that also provide protection of the frontal or primary dunes.
(f) The state should continue in its efforts to supplement and improve
highway, bridge and ferry access to and within the twenty -county coastal area
consistent with the approved local land use plans. Further, the state should
wherever practical, work to add public fishing catwalks to appropriate highway
bridges and should incorporate catwalks in all plans for new construction and for
remodeling bridges. It is the policy of the state to seek repeal of ordinances
preventing fishing from bridges except where public safety would be hazardous.
A-1
• (g) In order to avoid weakening the protective nature of frontal dunes,
no development will be permitted which would involve the removal or relocation
of frontal dune sand or frontal dune vegetation. 15 NCAC 7H 0306 (c). The
sands held in the frontal dunes are recognized as vital for the nourishment
and protection of ocean beaches.
(h) All land use plans and state actions to provide additional shorefront
access must recognize the need of providing access to all socio-economic groups.
(See Statutory Authority G.S. 113-A-102 (b); 113A-107; 113A-12A;)
A-2
APPENDIX B
TOOLS FOR AC4UIRING SHOkULINE ACCESS
Legislation
In North Carolina, public rights to use and access have
been established only .in the foredune area on Ocean beaches.
Legislation establishing a presumption of ,public rights of
assess over the dry sand and uplands (through private pro-
perty would be useful in North Carolina to help effectuate
public access.
Ag uisition
In acquisition of access areas for public use many
techniques can be used that include purchasing# donation,
establishment via litigation, and application of land use
control mechanisms.
• Access by purchase of fee simple title is the most direct
means of acquiring access.
Acquisition of Less Than Fee Interest is another means
by•which access can be obtained. Less Than Fee acquisition
involves the granting by property owner of a limited right or
Set- of rights to a second party. As a result, the property
owner continu6s to hold title to the land and is free to use
the land .in any manner which is consistent with the rights
conveyed to the acquiring party. Four ways of acquiring land
by less than fee simple interest are:
A. Purchase of easements
B. Prescriptive easements
C. Conservation easements
• Other means of acquisition are:
A. Eminent domain
D. Leaseholds
D. Implied reservation
B. Implied dedication
C. Trades
Post flood damage acquisition
B-1
•
Land Use Controls
Through the use of certain land use controls, public
shoreline access .is possible.
A. Required pedestrian access
B. Required dedication of roads to provide Access
C. Water access lots in new subdivisions.
Required pedestrian access.can be ,provided in zoning
(for example requiring a public accessway frym a public
roadway for each development involving recreation resource
frontage.
Required dedication affords public access by requiring
the extention of roads or right-of-ways to the shore
• and.dedication of these roads to the public.
Water access lots can be acquired by requiring by
subdivision ordinance in any waterfront development, water
lots be set aside for the benefit of interion lot owners.
The ordinance can require that each water access lot be
dedicated.to tho public.
B-2
APPENDIX C
• POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES
Land and Water Conservation Fund
This grant assistance service is managed by the
Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service and can
provide 50% funding for recreation acquisition and develop-
ment projects.
Federal Flood Insurance Program
Lands damaged substantially beyond repair can be
acquired by state or local agencies for management and use,
but must be used for at least forty years as a single land use.
No funds have been appropriated for this purpose as yet.
Regulations currently under development will require set-
backs for new development in identified erosion prone areas.
• in order to create a buffer which will be appropriate for
open space.
Federal DOT and FAA
DOT funds can be used for the establishment of open
space areas, bikeways, trails etc. for highway beauti-
fication. During the development of airports, consideration
is given to the use of land surrounding airports for park
and recreation facilities.
C-1
•
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Brower, David; Access to the Nation's-Beachesi Le ai ana riannin
Perspectives; 197 .
Emerald Isle, Town of; Zoning and Subdivision Regulations: 1975•
De Chiara, J. and Koppelman, L., Urban Planning and Design
Cris 1975-
North Carolina General Statutes; 153A-158_and 160A-11i; Counties
Recreation and Park Consultants;
WIPZ
ID
r