1981 Land Use Plan-1981

X
DCM COPY DCM COPY
lease do not remove!!!!!
Division of Coastal Management Copy
CAPE CARTERET
1981
LAND USE PLAN
Prepared by Cape Carteret Planning Board
The preparation of this report was financially aided
through a federal grant from the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration. The grant was made through
the North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and
Community Development.

w
NOTICE TO USERS
All major policy related maps and documents included i.,nthin the
original Land Use Plan of 1976 or this Up -dated Land Development Plan are
either included with the text, attached to the back of the plan, or are on
file at the proper" governmental offices. However, due to the expense and
technical limitations required for printing, sorie illustrations may be omitted.
Complete copies are and will be available for inspection at the N.C. Coastal
Resources Commission offices in Raleigh or at the local government offices.
- 2 -

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I.
Introduction
4
II.
Description of Present Conditions
6
III.
Public Participation Activities
23
IV.
Constraints
34
V.
Estimated Demand
37
VI.
Plan Description
41
VII.
Policies
47
VIII.
Major Conclusions
61
IX.
City -County Plan Relationship
62
Appendix 1 - Geology and Soils
(including maps)
63
Final Tabulation summary Survey
July 1979 - 11 PPs-
104
-3-

I. Introduction
The Town of Cape Carteret has prepared this up -dated Land Development Plan
in compliance with the Coastal Area Management Act of 1974. The objectives,
policies, and standards stated in this document represent the collective input
r from the citizens of Cape Carteret. Through proper implementation this plan will
continue to provide a solid foundation for effective land -use planning in the
a
future.
The. Coastal Area Management Act was adopted in 1974 by the North Carolina
Legislature in order to help the local governments of eastern North Carolina
form a basis for a comprehensive plan for the protection, preservation, orderly
development, and management of the coastal areas of the State. All of the
twenty coastal.counties and their respective municipalities were required by
the Act to adopt land development plans in compliance with the "Guidelines for
Planning in the Coastal Area." These guidelines were developed to aid the local
goverrrnnents in the coastal area comply with the requirements of the Coastal Area
Management Act.
The Cape Carteret Land Development Plan has and continues to include many
traditional aspects of land -use planning such as an analysis of the existing
population and economy and existing land uses. These aspects of planning are
tools that local governments can use to facilitate their planning efforts.
In our five-year Up -data, the Planning Board used information.obtained
from (1) a 'questionnaire mailed to all of the residents and land owners in
Cape Carteret - (2) two studies conducted by Coastal Consultants, Ltd., for
the Town of Cape Carteret, which also included questionnaires, and (3) public
meetings.
It is essential to understand the legislative goals of the Coastal
-4-

Area i-ianas-ement Act before readinc- this plan. They are:
1. To provide a mana:-ement system capable of -)reserving and managing
the natural ecological conditions of the estuarine system, the
barrier dune system, and the beaches, so .s to safe'-uard and per-
petuat.e their natural productivity and their biological, economic,
and aesthetic valves.
2. To insure that the development or preservation of the land'' :-nd
water resources of the coastal area. proceeds in a nanner ccnsistent
with the capability of the land and water for development, use, or
preservation based on ecological considerations.
3. To insure the orderly and balanced use and preservation of our coastal
resources on behalf of the *ocople of i:orth Carolina and the nation.
4. To estaolish policies, guidelines and standards for tae conservation
o_ resources; tae economic development of the coastal area; the use
of recreational lanais and tourist- facilities; the irise develop:,;ent
o_' transportation and circulation patterns; the preservation and
enhanc. nient of hdstorical, cultural, and scientific aspects of the
region; any: the protection of ca.u.on lair and Public ri_hts in the
lands anc'. craters of the coastal area.
- 5 -

II. Description of Present Conditions
In formulating a long range development plan, a close examination of the present
conditions is necessary. This section analyzes existing population and economic
characteristics, existing land uses and current plans, policies and regulations
of the Town of Cape Carteret. This analysis is intended to provide the necessary
background material to aid the decision -making process.
A. Population and Economy
1. Population - When Cape Carteret was incorporated in 1957, it had a
year around population of about 52. Since then, the population
increased to approximately 935 in 1980.
Population
*1�60 1970 im ME"
Cape Carteret 52 52 616 790 935
The population chart indicates that the population of Cape Carteret has
experienced a considerable increase since 1960. This increase has been attributed
in part to the fact that many of the people that purchased lots in Cape Carteret
during the early 1960's are now retired and moving to the area. The estimated
demands section of this plan indicates that this trend will continue at an accel-
erated rate during the next few years until near -total development is reached.
(*Note that the 1957 and 1960 population figures are the same. Since the
town was incorporated in 1957, the 1960 census figure was used as the
population at the time of incorporation. **Source of 1980 population is
the 1980 census.)
The concentration of the population initially took place in the Cape
Carteret subdivisions which made up the original city limits. When Star Hill
Golf Club, Inc. and Bay Shore Park subdivisions were included in the city limits,
the population began to be distributed throughout the current city limits.
In summary, the amount of development and the standard of living of the
citizens is somewhat dependent on the economic situation in the surrounding area.
The economic base within the Town limits only provides minimum essential services
and does not provide a broad economic base.
_6_

Z. Economy - Cape Carteret is basically a residential community. The
commercial establishments and services offered in the city limits are
designed to take care of the basic needs of the citizens of Cape
Carteret and not to provide an economic base.
The economic base throughout Carteret County and the adjacent County of
Onslow affect the Town of Cape Carteret. As has been mentioned, a large segment
of Cape Carteret's population is retired. A large portion of those that are not
retired work as civil service employees at Camp Lejeune Marine Base in Onslow
County or Cherry Point Marine Base in Craven County. An analysis of the total
work force for Carteret County will give some idea of the job opportunities
throughout Carteret County.
Carteret County Employment
Labor Force
Total
Manufact-
Non-
Public
Agricul-
Other
Rate of
Aver. Wkly.
Employ-
uring
Manufact-
Adminis-
tural
Unemploy--
Earnings per
ment
urine
tration
ment
Worker
1963
69820
1,16o
21660
920
620
19460
10.5%
$55.69
1964.
79070
11140
29930
930
500
19570
9.7
59.94
63.47
1965
79920
19200
30110
940
440.
29230
7.3
1966
81440
19340
39420
990
420
2,270
7.0
62.88
1967
89470
19430
39490
970
390
29190
6.6
64.28
1968
89840
19440
3,68o
19150
350
21,220
6.5
74.02
1969
99170
11,500
39770
19280
340
2280
4.5
79.03
1970
119580
1,610
39940
19470
330
2:330
4.7
83.12
1971
ll,380
19430
49100
1,410
330
2,320
5.3
89.80
1972
111,880
19580
4,410
19370
310
2,380
5.3
92.43
1973
139140
19740
59050
19470
430
19730
5.6
97.55
1974
13,170
19,790
6,52o
19610
390
1,690
5.5
106.98
1975
129490
19740
69700
19780
410
4730
7.8
117.85
1976
13,040
20010
79230
19800
430
19840
7.7
125.88
1977
139400
20080
79540
1,860
360
19940
8.2
137.36
1978
149390
29210
8,320
2,16o
330
29090
6.2
152.33
1979
139940
2070
89640
29160
310
29,140
6.6
167.30
1980
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
An analysis of the growth in the White Oak Township and Carteret County indicates
the White Oak Township and the County have been increasing rapidly since the
incorporation of Cape Carteret.
WHITE OAK TOWNSHIP
1950 1,260
White Oak
Township 1,273 19785
1970 1980
29496 29991*
This seems to indicate that the economic factors that are affecting growth in

the County are also affecting the growth of Cape Carteret.
The citizens of Cape Carteret are provided with essential shopping and services
for their needs within the town limits. The areas that provide major shopping
facilities for the citizens of Cape Carteret include Morehead City in Carteret
County, Jacksonville in Onslow County, and New Bern in Craven County.
B. Existing Land Use
An analysis of the existing land use in the Town of Cape Carteret is a
very important part of the planning process. This section will contain an
existing Land Use Map and a discussion of all types of land used in the
Town of Cape Carteret. Particular attention will be given to significant
land use compatibility problems, major problems which have resulted from
unplanned development, and areas experiencing or likely to experience major
changes in predominate Land Use.
The Town of Cape Carteret was incorporated in 1957, at which time it was
estimated that there were 52 residents. Since then the city limits have been
expanded to include three residential subdivisions. The current population of
Cape Carteret is approximately 935 residents.
Residential Land Use - There are 500 residential acres within the city
limits of Cape Carteret. As mentioned, all of these residential acres fall
within the subdivisions that have been incorporated in the city Limits. The
following chart will indicate the number of lots that are in the city limits
and the percent developed.
Cape Carteret
Total lots 19360
Developed lots 578
Undeveloped lots 786 `
Percent of lots
developed 42%
There are 428 housing units within the city limits of Cape Carteret. Since
there are 578 developed lots, it is obvious that many living units occupy more
than one lot.
Most of the 428 living units in Cape Carteret have been added since 1960.
-8-

Of the total living units, there are 305 conventional housing units, 96 mobile
homes, 16 Modular or Double-wides, and 3 condominimums (11 units).
Conventional Housing Units 305
Mobile Homes 96
Modular or Double-wides 16
Condominimums 11
Total living units 428
The location of the housing units began in the older subdivisions including
the original Cape Carteret Subdivisions and Bay Shore Park. Currently, these two
subdivisions are approximately 66 percent developed. The Star Hill Golf and
Country Club, Inc., is the most recent subdivision and is approximately 42 percent
developed. As already mentioned, approximately 43 percent of the total number of
lots in the city limits are developed.
There are approximately forty-two (42) acres of vacant residential land in
the city limits that are not platted. Public input indicates these areas will
most likely not .be platted until the majority of existing platted lots are developed.
Built-in Growth Factor
Vacant lots 786
Vacant residential
acres 42
The built-in growth factor indicates the ability of the Town of Cape
Carteret to grow. Traditionally, the built-in factor of growth refers to the growth
that is possible without further subdivision. Of the 786 vacant lots, it is estimated
that there will be a built-in growth factor of 589 structures. This estimate was
made -because of the fact that many of the existing lots are too small to meet building
standards and will have to be combined in order to support a building. The forty-two
(42) vacant residential acres were added to this chart because they will most likely
be subdivided for residential purposes within the long range estimates of this plan.
(Refer to the Estimated Demands Section of this plan for projected population growth.)
The significant residential growth in the next ten years will probably occur
in the Star Hill Golf Club, Inc., area. This has been determined because these
- 9 -

areas are the least developed and have experienced the most rapid growth during
the last few years.
Commercial Land Uses - The commercial land use in the City of Cape Carteret
has been in the form of basic services and basic commercial shopping. A listing
of the commercial uses in the Town of Cape Carteret is as follows:
Commercial Land Uses
1.
ABC (tore
8.
Wholesale Shellfish Co.
2,
Food Stores
9.
Restaurant
3.
Raul Estate and
10.
Dental Office
Engineering Office
11.
Construction Storage
4.
Banks
12.
Tool Rental
5.
Retail Stores
13.
Air Conditioning and
6.
Filling Stations
Sheet Metal Work
7.
Fish House
14.
Mini -storage
15. Rental
Offices
These existing commercial developments include approximately 33 acres. Most
are located along Highway 24. (Refer to the Existing Land Use Map for specific
identification.)
Governmental and Institutional Land Use - These two categories include the
Municipal property and the White Oak Elementary School. The municipal property
includes approximately one acre and located thereon are facilities for the Town
Hall, Rescue and Fire Services and a service garage. There are two major buildings
on the lot; one building includes the Town Hall and the Maintenance Shed. The
ABC Store is connected to this building, but is not on municipal property. A building
near the rear of the lot houses the Cape Carteret Volunteer Fire and Rescue vehicles.
The White Oak School is located on approximately 30 acres on the north side
of Highway 249 near the geographic center of the Town limits. This school contains
grades If - 8 and has an enrollment of 592.
Vacant Land - As mentioned, there are 786 vacant lots in the city limits and
42 vacant residential acres. There are also 42 vacant commercially zones acres.
Areas of Environmental Concern - The following arcs of Environmental Concern
are present within the town of Cape Carteret&
A. The Estuarine System
Areas of Environmental Concern Within the Estuarine Systems:
1. Coastal Wetlands

(a) Description. Coastal wetlands are defined as any salt marsh or
other marsh subject to regular or occasional flooding by tides, including
wind tides (whether or not the tide waters reach the marshland areas
through natural or artificial watercourses), provided this shall not
include hurricane or tropical storm tides. In Cape Carteret coastal
wetlands occur to the south at Bogue Sound, and to the north at
Pettiford Creek.
Coastal wetlands contain some, but not necessarily all, of the
following marsh .plant species:
(1) Cord Grass (Spartina alterniflora),
(2) Black Needlerush (Juncus roemerianus),
(3) Glasswort (Salicornia spp.),
(4) Salt Grass (Distichlis spicata),
(5) Sea Lavender (Limonium spp.),
(6) Bulrush) (Scirpus spp.),
(7) Saw Grass (Cladium jamaicense),
(8), Cat -tail (Typha spp.),
(9) Salt Meadow Grass (Spartina patens),
(10) Salt Reed Grass (Spartina cynosuroides).
Included it this definition of coastal wetlands is "such contiguous
land as the Secretary of NR&CD reasonably deems necessary to affect
by any such order in carrying out the purposes of this Section."
(G.S. 113-230(a) )
(b) Significance. The unique productivity of the estuarine system is
supported by detritus (decayed plant material) and nutrients that are
exported from the coastal marshlands. The amount of exportation and
degree of importance appears to be variable from marsh to marsh,
depending primarily upon its frequency of inundation and inherent
characteristics of the various plant species. Without the marsh,'the
high productivity levels and complex food chains typically found in
the estuaries could not be maintained.
Man harvests various aspects of this productivity when he fishes,
hunts, and gathers shellfish from the estuary. Estuarine dependent
species of fish and shellfish such as menhaden, shrimp, flounder,
oysters, and crabs currently make up over 90 percent of the total
- 11 -

value of North Carolinats corviercial catch. The marshlands, therefore,
support an enormous amount of commercial and recreational businesses
along the seacoast.
The roots, rhizomes, stems, and seeds of coastal wetlands act as
good quality waterfowl and wildlife feeding and nesting materials. In
addition, coastal wetlands serve as the first line of defense in retarding
estuarine shoreline erosion. The plant stems and leaves tend to dissipate
wave action, while the vast network of roots and rhizomes resists soil
erosion. In this way, the coastal wetlands serve as barriers against
flood damage and control eronsion between the estuary and the uplands.
Marshlands also act as nutrient and sediment traps by slowing the
water which flows over them and causing suspended organic and inorganic
particles to settle out. In this manner, the nutrient storehouse is
maintained, and sediment harmful to marine organisms is removed. Also,
pollutants and excessive nutrients are absorbed by the marsh plants, thus
f
providing an inexpensive water treatment service.
2. Estuarine Waters
(a) Description. Estuarine waters are defined in G.S. 113A-113(b) (2)
as pall the water of the Atlantic Ocean within the boundary of North
Carolina and all the waters of the bays, sounds, rivers, and tributaries
thereto seaward of the dividing line between coastal fishing waters and
inland fishing waters.
In Cape Carteret, estuarine waters are Bogue Sound to the south and
Pettiford Creek to the north. Please see Appendix for a complete listing
of all water quality studies available at this time on these estaurine
waters.
(b) Signifiance. Estuarine waters are the dominant component and
bonding element of the entire estuarine system, integrating aquatic
influences from both the land and the sea. Estuaries are among the
most productive natural environments of North Carolina. They support

the valuable commercial and sports fisheries of the coastal area which
are comprised of estuarine dependent species such as menhaden, flounder,
shrimp, crabs, and oysters. These species must spend all or some part
of their life cycle within the estuarine waters to mature and reproduce.
Of the 10 leading species in the commercial catch, all but one are
dependent on the estuary.
This high productivity associated with the estuary results from its
unique circulation patterns caused by tidal energy, fresh water flow,
and shallow depth; nutrient trapping mechanisms; and protection to the
many organisms. The circulation of estuarine waters transports nutrients,
propels plankton, spreads seed stages of fish and shellfish, flushes
wastes from animal and plant life, cleanses the system of pollutants,
controls salinity, shifts sediments, and mixes the water to create a
multitude of habitats. Some important features of the estuary include
mud and sand flats, eel grass beds, salt marshes, submerged vegetation
flats, clam and oyster beds, and important nursery areas.
Secondary benefits include the stimulation of the coastal economy
from the spin-off operations required to service commercial and sports
fisheries, waterfowl hunting, marinas, boatyards, repairs and supplies,
processing operations, and tourist -related industries. In addition,
there is considerable non -monetary value associated with aesthetics,
recreation, and education.
3. Public Trust Areas
(a) Description. Public trust areas are all waters of the Atlantic
Ocean and the lands thereunder from the mean high water mark to the
seaward limit of State jurisdiction; all natural bodies of water subject
to measurable lunar tides and lands thereunder to the mean high water
mark; all navigable natural bodies of water and lands thereunder to
the mean high water level or mean water level as the case may be,
except privately -owned lakes to which the public has no right of access;
all water in artificially created bodies of water containing significant
- 13-

public fishing resources or other public resources which are accessible to
the public by navigation from bodies of water in which the public has
rights of navigation; and all waters in artificially created bodies of
water in which the public has acquired rights by prescription, custom,
usage, dedication, or any other means. In determining whether the public
has acquired rights in artificially created bodies of water, the follow-
ing factors shall be considered:
(1) the use of the body of water by the public,
(2) the length of time the public has used the area,
(3) the value of public resources in the body of water,
(4) whether the public resources in the body of water are mobile
to the extent that they can move into natural bodies of water,
(5) whether the creation of the artificial body of water required
permission from the State, and
(6) the value of the body of water to the public for navigation from
one public area to another public area.
Public Trust Areas within Cape Carteret are Bogue Sound to the South
and Pettiford Creek to the north.
(b) Significance. The public has rights in these areas, including
navigation and recreation. In addition, these areas support valuable
commercial and sports fisheries, have aesthetic value, and are important
resources for economic development.
4. Estuarine Shorelines
(a) Rationale. As an AEC, estuarine shorelines, althought characterized
as dry land are considered a component of the estuarine system because of
the close association with the adjacent estuarine waters. This Section
defines estuarine shorelines, describes the significance and articulates
standards for development.
(b) Description. Estuarine shorelines are those non -ocean shorelines
which are especially vulnerable to erosion, flooding, or other adverse
-14-

effects of wind and water and are intimately connected to the estuary.
This area exterdds from the mean high water level or normal water level
along the estuaries, sounds, bays, and brackish waters as set forth in an
agreement adopted by the Wildlife Resources Coed ssion and the Department of
Natural Resources and Community Development, for a distance of 75 feet
landward. Estuarine shorelines in the town of Cape Carteret occur to the
South at Bogue Sound and the the north at Pettiford Creek.
(c) Significance. Development within estuarine shorelines influences
the quality of estuarine life and is subject to the damaging processes
of shore front erosion and flooding.
Problems Related to Past Development - Basically, Cape Carteret is a well -planned
town that is very desirable to the citizens; however, there are some land development
problems:
(1) Some of the existing lots are too small to accommodate present building
standards. Some property owner= will be required to combine two or more
lots together in order to utilize a single lot.
(2) Past and present development trends do not leave buffer zones between
residential and commercial uses.
(3) In some areas, lack of control of the placement of mobile homes has caused
problems. In some instances, more than one mobile home has been placed on
a single lot.
(4) Past development did not provide for adequate recreational areas.
Currently, park areas for the Town are leased.
(5) One of the most severe problems stems from a seemingly slight emphasis
on separation of water and sewer facilities one one lot from those on
the adjacent lot. Most home owners have proper separation on their own
well and septic tank, however. ,
(6) In the past, little regard was given to proper building requirements in
flood prone areas.
This discussion of the existing Land Use and Land Use problems is an essential
*part.of the:planning.processThe land use,map in this section will aid in
- c

in representing the different'land uses that have been discussed in this section.
Seasonal population is not an issue in Cape Carteret.
C. Current Plans, Policies, and Regulations, Including New State Regulations on
Building in Flood -prone Areas.
To fully understand the existing situation in the Town of Cape Carteret, a
listing and suirmnary of existing plans, policies, and regulations having signi-
ficant implications for land use must be included.
(1) Zoning Ordinance 1974 - Zoning can be one of the most important means of
implementing land use objectives, policies, and standards. In 1974, the
Town of Cape Carteret adopted a zoning ordinance that set minimum standards
for development, as well as helping separate different types of land use.
The Zoning ordinance is enforced by the Carteret County building inspector.
The adoption, or amendment, to the zoning ordinance first goes to the
Cape Carteret Planning Commission for "commendations and then to the
Town Board for the final decision. All final decisions on the adoption
of zoning regulations or their.amendment can only occur after a public
hearing. Any appeal from a decision of the zoning enforcement officer
(building inspector), request for a variance, or request for interpretation
is taken before the Zoning Board of Adjustments.
(2) Subdivision Regulations - 1975 - The Town of Cape Carteret adopted
subdivision regulations in 1975 to assure that further subdivisions of
the land in the Planning Area of Cape Carteret are orderly and conform
with existing development. The Cape Carteret Subdivision Regulations
require requests for subdivisions to be taken to the Cape Carteret
Planning Hoard for preliminary and final approval before the actual
subdivision of the property can take place.
(3) N. C. State Building Codes - The Town of Cape Carteret adopted the
State Building Code of 1974 when the Zoning Ordinance was adopted.
Until then, Carteret County enforced the State Building Code within
-I(D

the City limits. Presently, the Carteret County Building Inspector
inspects all construction and enforces the Code.
(4) Health Regulations - Since Cape Carteret does not have central water
and sewer services, the Carteret County Health Department regulates
the installations of wells and septic tanks. The installation of
sewage disposal systems is governed by the "Regulations Governing
Design, Construction, Installation, Cleaning and Use of Sewage Disposal
Systems in Carteret County", adopted by the Carteret County Health
Department on February 139 1974. These regulations are expected to
be updated in the near future. The Environmental Health Division of
the Carteret County Health Department inspects all installations and
enforces the ordinance.
(5), Regional Sewer Plan - The Town of Cape Carteret participated in the
development of the Swansboro Area 201 Regional Sewer Plan.
(6) Water and Shoreline Studies - The Town of Cape Carteret also commissioned
a Water System Study and Shoreline Access Study, which studies were
conducted by Coastal Consultants, Ltd., and these studies were
completed in August 1980.
(7) State and Federal Regulations - It should be noted that State and
Federal regulations affect development within the planning area of
Cape Carteret. A list of these ordinances is available, and each
property owner should,become aware of these ordinances before land
development occurs. *
* See Schedules A and B hereto attached.
- 17 -

CITY ,
B 0 G U E S 0 U N D.
. 5Government 8i Institutional
Cultural, entertainment 81 recreation
Undeveloped land
Agriculture
Forest la nd
Wate r
Wetland
Barren
EXISTING LAND USE MAP
CAPE CARTERET
GCCUNACT
NOT
CITY LIMITSPLANNING AREA GUARANTEED
PRE►AR[D1Y THE CARTERET DATE: 4�7�75 REVISED
COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
►URSUANT TO THE COASTAL SCALE: I INCH = 400 FEET " �' °
400 0 200 400 Soo i
AR MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1974. E/y
x00 1600 '

rency
Depart.nient of Natural Resources and
Com_.,unity Developsent
Division of Environmental ',!ana,eaent
j
Department of Natural P.esources and
Co ::.lunity Development
Office of Coastal `:anaFesent
Depal.•tment of '?atu.-al-esources %ad
Co -_,unity Development
Division of :arch Resources,
Licenses and Permits
• PerLiits to dischar-,e to surface waters
or overate i,.aste water trea.tnient
plants or oil discharge permits;
NPDES Per_aits. (G.S. 143-215) .
Permits for septic taa'rs !sith a
capacity over 30DG gallons day
(G.S. 143-215.3).
Permits for withdrawal ^f cur -
face or ground :staters in
capacity use arias (G.S. 143-
215-15).
- Permits for air pollution abate-
ment facilities and sources
(G.S. 143-215.108).
Permits for construction of com-
_:lex sources; e.g. par';ing lots,
subc:ivisions, stadiu.ns, etc.
(G.S. 143-215.109).
Permits for construction of a
well over 17), 003 gallons/day
(G.S. 87-33) •
Permits to dredne end/or fill
in estuarine -;.atars, tidelanris,
etc. (G.S. 113-229).
- Per --its to underta'__e develop-
ent in Areas of Environ•aental
Concern (G.S. 113A-229).
110TE: vinor develop:.gent -jer-,its
are issued by the local
governnent.
- Permito to alter or construct
a 6%u.i (G.S. 14J-215.66).
- Permits to ;nine (G.S. 74-51) .

c, Z e,.,::10 r.-:-
tory oil or 6-ac '.-Tell (G.S.
- Per.lits to cOaducta-
cal e::-oloration (G.S. 113-3?1) .
- Sedimentation eronsion control
plans for any land dicta--binG
activity of over one c:,_1tiZuous
acre (G.S. 113A-54)•
Depart -lent of :'atural Resources ;-..zd - Permits to cO'struct a-'! Oil
Co: ;unity refinery.
Secretary of .?RCD
Department of Administration
- Fase:aents to fill where la.n�' s
are nro-josed. to be rail ser ^bore
the normal high ,rater mark of
navigable waters by filling
(G.S. 146.6(c)).
Department of Human Resources - Approval to operate a solid
waste disposal site or facility
(G.S. 130-166..16).
- Approval for construction of
any public water sup- ly facility
that furnishes water to 15 or
more year round residences or
25 or more year round residents.
(G.S. 130-160.1) .
- 20 -

SC11=1 1 LE B
AL.ency Licenses and Permits
Army Corps of n ;ineers
(Department of Defense)
Coast Guard
(Department of Transportation)
Geological Survey
Bureau of Land "ana;e.mont
(Department of Interior)
Nuclear Regulatory Co:,::i: sion
- Permits required under Sections
9 and 10 of :.ae 'livers zn
Harbors of1j'99; permits to
construct in navigable xRtars.
- Permits reattired under Section
103 of the "urine Protection,
??esearch and Santuaries Act of
1972.
- Permits required under Section
404 of the Federal :'later
Pollution Control Act of 1)72;
permits to undertake dred-ing
1-1
and/or filli p activities.
- Permits for bridges, causeways,
pipelines over navigable waters;
required under the General Bridge
Act of 1r)46 and the Rivers and
Harbors Act of 1399.
i
- Deep :aater port permits.
- Permits required "or off -shore
drilling.
- Approvals of OCS i,ipelia,:!
corridor ri,--hts-of-c;ay.
- Licenses for siting, construction
and o-oeraticn of nuclear tior:er
plants; required unce_ tl-ie Atonic
Energy Act of 10.5b. P_a1 Title II of.
the Ezer;;y ?eor-wanization Act of
1'374
Federal Eaergy Regulatory Co:..;ission - Permits cUi construction,
opera -ion nnu Mai.nte_1--ice of
interstate '_iD.elines facilities
requi r,:)d under t::e Natural Gas
Act of 1933.
- 21 -

- Orders o£ £2tarc022c=L2?= 0£
electric t2a=sli3sisa fz=
tiee ==£0r Section 2g2(t} o£
the Federal power Act.
- Permission required £0r
ab don ent 52 -i--- tar=l Sae
pipeline an('. &zcociat-C
facilities Qa6er Section 7C(5)
of the 7atQra1 @as Act of 1J52-
- Licensee for non-federal
hydro -electric 22oject2 and
a22ociate( traisliGeion lines
under Sections h 3mJ I) of the
Federal Power Act.
15Lists Provided 5Z the Sc DNRCD.
- 22 -

III Public Participation
Activities
For a Land Development Plan to be effective, it must reflect the desires of
the local people. The Cape Carteret Town Board and Planning Board have attempted
to determine the desires of the local people through an extensive public participa-
tion program that has been carried out over the past eighteen months. The input
received from the public has been used to help determine the major land use issues
that will be faced during the planning period and to determine objectives, policies,
and standards for future land development. The following discussion will summarize
the public input and relate the objectives, policies, and standards to the input
that was received.
Public Input Process - Public input was solicited in the following three basic
ways during the past eighteen months - questionnaires, public meetings and
input generated from interactions between citizens and Board members. Questionnaires
were both written and by phone. Public meetings were duly publicized as required
and (3) input generated from interactions between citizens and the Town Board and
Planning Board saemnbers.
(A) Questionnaires were sent to all property owners and residents of Cape
Carteret. Of the approximately 470 questionnaires distributed, 153
were returned - a total of 32.6%. A complete copy of the Final Tabulation
and Summary of Return Sheets, July 1979 Survey, Town of Cape Carteret,
is hereto attached. The following questions from this questionnaire
were easily summarized, however:
(1) Like Most About Cape Carteret?
Quiet, peaceful
102
Water and/or Beach Access
35
• Small-town, rural atmosphere
33
People, friendly, neighborly, good
23
Weather, climate, environment
19
Geographic location
17
Relaxed rural existence, slow -pace
13
Security, Police Dept., Community Watch
7
Country Club available
6
Others
29
23

(2) Like least about Cape Carteret?
Lack of gervices, i.e., shopping centers, libraries,
post office, job opportunities, specific type
stores 18
Developers' conflict of interest 16
Town squabbles 15
Over -grown vacant areas 11
Others (see complete summary hereto attached) 51
(3) What can the Town do to improve your neighborhood?
Nothing 14
Clean up vacant lots, waterways and shallows, etc. 19
Enforce all ordinances strictly 17
Improve streets and drainage problems 24
Establish recreational areas and programs 4
Others 18
(4) How can you improve.your town?
Upgrade and maintain homes and property
Good and responsible citizenship
Nothing
Be "good neighbor"
"Dontt know"
Others
(5) Does Cape Carteret Need ?
A. Industry
B. Shopping facilities
C. Better roads
D. Better drainage
S. Better police protection
F. Beach access
G. Community Center
H. Recreational facilities
(6) What recreational facilities are wanted?
Parks
Improvements in parks, pltygound equip-
ment, etc.
Tennis courts
Athletic fields - baseball, soccer,
softball, etc.
Basketball courts
" Nature", jogging and bike trails
Recreation center - crafts, etc.
Better boating facilities:
Swimming pool
Others
40
17
16
3
5
15
Yes
No
No opinion
20
104
9
67
60
15
61
55
23
79
71
18
91
34
9
56
54
24
70
45
22
19
19
19
18
7
5
30
16
8
29
(7) Planned growth versus unplanned growth for the Town?
Yes — 116 No — 7 No opinion - 8
(8) Do you want----------?

A. Water system? Yes - 39
No - 95
No
opinion - 11
Want more facts - 1
B. Sewer system? Yes - 33
No - 95
No
opinion - 10
C. How much would you pay per
month for
these?
$15.00 per month - 2
$25.00
- 3
$10.00 - 5
10.00 to 15.00 - 2
20.00
- 1
15.00 to 20.00 - 1
5*00 to 7.00 - 1
30.00
- 1
50.00 - 1
17.50 water only - 1
Reasonable
rate and/or same as
Whatever it takes - 13
Morehead -Jacksonville - 3
Other amounts - 4
(9) Would the development or use of the land next to you concern you?
Yes - 128 No - 16
(10) Opinion of roads and/or streets?
Good - 44 Fair - 73
Need improvement - 32
(11) Are you ----------
A. Property owner and tax -payer?
Tax -payer only circled
Status unclear, circled only A
B. Full-time resident?
Non-resident or part-time?
No opinion - 5
Poor - 7
142
1
10
100
42
C. Number of people in your residence?
1-4 2-65 3-18 4-8
5-2 6-2 7-1
(12) Want strict enforcement of all town ordinances and N.C. statutes?
Yes - 100 No - 17 No opinion - 17
Qualified their answers - 15
(13) What services, if any, rendered by the Town should be reduced, considering
inflation, etc.?
None - 44 Limited knowledged/unqualified to answer - 9
What services? - 6 No opinion - 8 Others - 45
(141 Want "staggered terms for commissioners"?
Yes - 94 No - 26 No opinion - 18
Limit to two (2) terms - 1
(15) Should Planning Board have active function relative to environment?
Yes - 101 No - 15 No opinion - 19
(16) Why did you choose Cape Carteret as a place to live or retire?
Based on all questions answered, the following reflects reasons in
total, not in order of choice, for choosing Cape Carteret as a home
or place of retirement. For a complete breackdown, see Summary attached.
- 25 -

A.
Reasonably priced house or land
- 83
Be
Good place to raise children
- 35
C.
Schools nearby
- 25
D.
Close to friends or relatives
- 44
E.
Quiet
.. 103
F.
Pleasant surroundings
- 104
G.
Close to work
- 21
H.
Low taxes
- 78
I.
Small town
- 97
J.
Retirement service facilities
- 60
K.
Others
- 31
(17) Would you serve on a Town Board, if asked?
Now? Yes - 34 No - ,?1$ No opinion - 19
In the Future? Yes - 15
(18) If yes to #17, give area of interest.
Planning Board - 6 Education - 1 Library - 1
Recreation --2 Budget -finance - 1 Environmental legislation - 1
Clerical reserach - 1
Several persons seemed>unsure, but could do whatever they were qualified
to do.
(19) Additional comments? Many residents or future residents expressed
opinions, concerns, anger, bitterness, needs, desires, etc., in this
space. Some made serious suggestions to improve, up -grade, and, in
general, be supportive to town government and officials. These are
contained in the complete summary and may be read in their entirety
at the Town Hall.
Those responding to the questionnaires indicated a desire to preserve the
rural nature of Cape Carteret, to increase existing services as the Town grows.
A desire to minimize the effects Highway 24 has on the community was a constant
response. Basic shopping services were desired by most participants. The
responses indicate a need to concentrate efforts to preserve the natural
environments around Cape Carteret, and to adopt land use regulations consistent
with these desires.
An additional questionnaire was conducted by Coastal Consultants, Ltd., as
a part of the two studies conducted by theca on behalf of the Town of Cape
Carteret. These studies were completed in August 1980, and took approximately
one year to completion. Study #1.- Water System and Study #2 - Beach and Shoreline
Access were o6 maissioned by the Town Board. Two methods of response to the
questionnaires of Coastal Consultants were by direct mailings to a scientifically
selected group of citizens and/or land owners, and the telephoning to a second

scientifically selected group of residents and securing a direct input through
their responsesa The results of the survey is easily summarized and is included
herewith:
Town of Cape Carteret Questionnaire
Conducted Coastal Consultants, Ltd..
Water Facilities
i' Areas with relatively dense developsmemt, poor soil characteristics
i for on -lot sewage disposal and shallow wells sometimes have drinking
water problems.
i
1. Do you have water Quantity problems with you present well?
Yes - 10% No - 90%
2. Do you have water quality problems with your present well?
Yes - 27% No - 73%
3. Do you use any type of water treatment?
Yes - 48% No - 52%
4. If you use any type water treatment, what kin of treatment do
you use?
Of these who said "Yes" above, 95% use softener only,
5% use additional filters and odor removers.
5. The Cape Carteret fire department has noted that potential fire -fighting
problems could occur due to the limited amount of water that can be
carried in tank trucks and the concern of mechanical problems during
time of emergency. Furthermore, insurance for fire protection is
higher for communities without public water systems. (For example,
fire insurance for #359000 is $30.00 higher per year.)
To what extent do you feel that the above fire -related aspects
contribute to consideration of a public water system?
41% Very important 32% Moderate 28% Very little
6. Would you be willing to pay an additional ten cents ($.10) per$100
of Assessed Valuation per year to have a public water system?
Yes - 53% No - 45% No opinion - 2%
7. Would you pay more, if necessary?
Yes - 34
S. If yes, how much,more?
No - 62% No opinion - 6%
Of those who answered "yes" to the above, the average additional
amount was $75.00 per year.
9. Do you think Cape Carteret will need a public water supply system

Yes - 58%
Beach (Shoreline) Access
No - 47% No opinion - 12%
Areas such as Cape Carteret, which are close to beach areas, but have no
public land on the beach, often are in a situation which is frustrating to
residents.
10. Does Cape Carteret need parking facilities close to the Ocean access
points on Emerald Isle?
Yes - 5% No - 37% No opinion - 5%
Perhaps it may be determined that the only way to achieve proper access
and parking at Emerald Isle is to purchase land, build and maintain a parking
lot for residents of the Town of Cape Carteret,
1.1. If the financing was through bonds or the general tax revenues, would
you be willing to pay an additional ten cents ($.10) per $100 of assessed
valuation per year?
Yes - 42% No - 47% No opinion - 14
12. If another method was available (such as paying a yearly fee for a
parking pass) would you pay $25.00 per year?
Yes - 42% No - 54 No opinion - 4%
13. Would you pay more, if necessary?
Yes - 16%
14. If yes, how much more?
No - 70% No opinion - 14%
Of those who said Yes- to the above, the average amount was $50.00
per year.
15. If an area solution to the access and parking problem is not available,
should the Town of Cape Carteret try to gain access on its own?
Yes - 41% No - 47% No opinion - 12%
In summation, these two studies revealed that while a water supply system may
be desired by some, the majority do not feel same is necessary in the near future.
Beach access is also wanted by many of the residents, but the majority do not
feel it is up to the Town of Cape Carteret to provide same at this time or in the
near future.
B. Public Meetings were held to give interested members of the public an opportunity
to put additional input in to the planning process. The input seemed to uphold
the opinions expressed in the questionnaires and most comments expressed similar
needs and desires as set forth in the written comments. Other desires that were

stated at the public meetings involved a need for better communication between
the citizens of Cape Carteret and all governing boards.
C. Public Inp3t was generated from interactions between citizens and Town Board
and Planning Board members. This input helped the members of the two Boards
analyze the overall input received. In summary, most citizens or crape uarzereL
are pleased with their town and desire the basic atmosphere of the town to remain
as it is now. Due to the consistent responses at the public meetings and relatively
high return of questionnaires, the Planning Board and Town Board feel this plan
is a reflection of the desires of the citizens of Cape Carteret. They also realize
that through continued public input they can be assured the desires and needs of the
citizens are reflected in the Town's planning program.
This public input has been used in the following manner: The questionnaires
were summarized by the Planning Board and made available to the Town Board; the
Planning.Board and the Town Board members attended the public meetings. After
Iseveral meetings and many rough drafts and changes, the Town Board and Planning
Board decided on the plan that is contained in this document.
i
Land Use Issues - An intergral part of any planning process is the identification
of the issues that have to be faced during the planning period. Through careful
analysis of the public input, as well as the existing conditions of Cape Carteret,
land use issues have been identified. Without facing up to these issues, land
development planning will not be effective in Cape Carteret.
1. The impact of population and economic trends on land development in
Cape Carteret.
A. Population trends are important because they affect all aspects
of land development in Cape Carteret. As the population increased,
it enhanced the desire to incorporate; created the needs for
municipal and private services such as convenience stores.
As the population increased subsequent to incorporation, other
effects became noticeable:
(1) The local school system became crowded.
(2) ThA m-ad for land use rea_ulations and enforcement

personnel became needed.
(3) Local elected and appointed boards received expanded
responsibility, especially in terms of land development
planning.
Future population trends gill have a profound affect on land development in
Cape Carteret. If the population continues to expand as expected, additional
demands will be placed on services offered by the city and will bring a need
for additional services. This can be readily seen when one considers there are
786 vacant residential lots in the city limits. Because of the small size of many
of the lots, the Planning Board estimates that 589 additional dwellings could
be built on these lots. Also, as population increases, the land i-rill become
developed and pressures for expansion of Town boundaries will probably follows.
B. Economic trends will also have an impact on land development in Cape
Carteret. The amount of development in Cape Carteret is affected by
the overall economics of the County and the Nation. This is particularly
true because Cape Carteret is mainly a residential town, and only
encourages those businesses that supply the basic necessities for the
residents and prop^rty owners. Employment is dependent on the two
nearby military installations and regional shopping centers are used
by most citizens. As the over-all economic situation prospers, the town
of Cape Carteret will also grow and prosper.
To be prepared for growth, the Town of Cape Carteret must
const antly analyze the growth of surrounding areas. Past trends
have indicated amounts of construction within the city limits were
related to amounts of construction in the county in general. This
issue must be addressed because the economy affects growth in the
city limits and growth causes pressure on services as well as creates
desires to expand.
ikm

2. Needed Municipal. Services
The citizens of Cape Carteret have indicated municipal services are important
tp them. This is evidenced by the fact that the residential areas comprising
the Town of Cape Carteret have incorporated. Since incorporation of the Town,
additional population has increased the need for solid waste disposal, fire
protection, rescue services, recreational services, and police protection.
If Cape Carteret is going to continue to develop, the type and level of
services provided by the Town must be addressed in the land development plan.
3. The Natural Resource and Natural Environment Issue
Cape Carteret is bordered by Bogue Sound, portions of the Pettiford Creek -
White Oak River complex, and the Croatan, National Forest. Obviously, develop-
ment in Cape Carteret may affect the estuarine waters, the wetlands, and the
natural beauty of the area. Most residents of Cape Carteret value these
resources highly, and feel land development within Cape Carteret should
consider these important areas. If these areas are severely affected by the
development of Cape Carteret, the area will lose the appeal that attracted the
residents to this small town. Also, one must remember these natural areas
are important to everyone.
The three basic issues included in this section must be faced squarely
during the planning process. Without proper emphasis on these issues, there
is a high probability that development will be a liability instead of an
asset.
Alternatives - The issues that have been identified can be faced in many different
ways. 'The citizens of Cape Carteret have had to decide whether to remain essenti-
ally a residential area or to encourage many types of land use. They ha ve had to
pick out those things that they feel the city needs and those the city does not
need. The Town of Cape Carteret is like almost any other town in Eastern North
Carolina in that it could choose to develop in many different ways. The input
received during the planning process has indicated to the Town Board and Planning
Board the desires of the citizens of Cape Carteret. These desires indicate that
- 31-

alternatives have been considered, and decisions have been made by the people.
Objectives.' Policies, and Standards
Once the major land use issues have been identified, a method of facing these
issues must be formulated. This has been done in the Cap) Carteret Land Development
Plan by the identification of land use objectives, policies, and standards. These
objectives, policies, and standards should give the Planning Board and Town Board
a clear indication of public desires and wishes. It is important to remember
that all land use objectives are not equally obtainable.. With this in mind, "trade-
offs" must be made in order to arrive at decisions that are consistent with the
overall desires of the residents and property owners of Cape Carteret.
The objectives, policies, and standards that have been determined by the.
participants in the planning process of the Cape Carteret Land Development Plan
are as follows
1. Continue to provide for a rural residential community that reflects Cape
Carteret's coastal nature through:
A. Land Use Regulations that provide for basically low density
residential uses.
B. Take all possible action to insure that any further widening of
Highway 24 beyond the present right-of-way be done in such a manner
that it does not interfere with the property rights of the citizens
of Cape Carteret.
C. Adopt land use regulations that provide for the -development of
basic services and basic commercial shopping. These should include
such uses as retail food stores, service stations, dry cleaners,
hardware stores, banks, medical and dental offices.
2. Expand existing services and the development of those services required
to maintain the standards desired by the citizens of Cape Carteret, through:
♦. Emphasizfng the need for recreational facilities for all age groups,
- 32 -
1,

(1) Land use regulations that preserve those areas, such as flood plain
areas, that may be well -suited for recreational uses to facilitate
this idea.
(2) Include recreational area requirement within the subdivision regulations
in the event additional land is subdivided.
• (3) Initiate a study to determine the possibility of acquiring recrea-
tional areas and the possible sources of revenue that could be used
to acquire these areas.
(4) Encouranging improved communication efforts between the Carteret
County Recreation Department and the Carteret County Board of
Education, to facilitate the optimum use of recreational facilities
in the Cape Carteret area.
B: Expand rescue, fire and police services as the population increases.
C. Expand solid waste collection services as population increases.
D. Examine the cost of services and analyze all taxes, permits, and fees to
assure the citizens using services are bearing the major costs of the services.
3. Develop land use regulations that prevent development that has a high likelihood
of affecting estuarine waters and wetlands.
4. Improve lines of communication between the citizens of Cape Carteret and the local
officials, and strive to improve the lines of communication between the Town and
County governments, through:
A. Develop and support a plan for frequent review of the land development
plan that encourages a high level of public participation during the
review process.
B. Request appointed and elected officials to communicate frequently
with all County elected and appointed Boards.
C. Emphasizing a need for the interests of Cape Carteret to be represented
on the County Planning Board.
- 33

IV. Constraints
Land development in coastal North Carolina must consider possible constraints
that arise from land potential, fragile areas, and areas with resource potential.
Development in these areas may be too costly or may cause undesirable consequences.
A. Physical Limitations
1. Hazard Areas - These conditions constitute physical limitations that are
extremely expensive and in some cases impossible to overcome.. The
inability to overcome these limitations may result in severe damage to
construction. These areas include:
Excessive Erosion Areas - In the Town of Cape Carteret, this includes
sound erosion areas; areas along Bogue Sound that have a high probability
of excessive erosion. In these areas, a 30 year recession line will be
used to identify the extent of the erosion areas. These areas are
included in the Areas of Environmental Concern description; refer to
Section II for a more detailed discussion of these areas.
Flood Hazard Areas - These are areas adjacent to Bogue Sound and Pettlford-
Creek that are within the 100-year flood line. Improper development in
these areas may unreasonably endanger life and property. The flood
hazard area map prepared by the Department of Housing and Urban
Development is on file in the Cape Carteret Town Hall.
2. Soil Limitations - The soil within the city limits of Cape Carteret is
capable of sustaining the anticipated growth. Vhis can be demonstrated
by the fact that a large portion of the city is developed. For further
discussion on soils, see section on Soils and Soil Maps.
Because Cape Carteret is bordered by estuarine waters indicates there are
limitations to development. Although it is felt that the Town could continue to
develop without a sewer system, it would be very desirable to have a central sewer
system in order to prevent any unnecessary effects septic tanks may have on the
estuarine waters.
- 3p -
9

3. Water Supply Areas - Like all other areas of Carteret County, the
Castle-Hayne Acquifer is the main supply of water in the Town of Cape
Carteret. The use of land throughout Eastern North Carolina and the
amount the Castle -Rayne Acquifer is used is important. The water
supply has to be managed jointly by all areas of Eastern North Carolina.
4. Steep Slopes - Cape Carteret is not affected by steep slopes.
B. Fragile Areas - These are areas that may be damaged or destroyed by
inappropriate or poorly planned development. In Cape Carteret these
areas includes
1. Coastal Wetlands - Coastal wetlands are defined as "any salt marsh or
other marsh subject to regular or occasional flooding due to tides,
including wind tides (whether or not the tide waters reach the marsh-
land or artificial watercourses), provided this shall not include
hurricane or tropical storm tides."
2. Estuarine Waters - Estuarine waters are defined as "all the waters of
the Atlantic Ocean within the boundary of North Carolina and all the
waters of the bays, sounds, rivers, and tributaries thereto, seaward
of the dividing line between coastal fishing waters and inland fishing
waters as set forth by the Wildlife Resources Commission and the
Department of Conservation and Development."
3. Areas Subject to Public Rights - Areas such as waterways and lands
under or flowed by tidal or navigable waters, to which the public
may have rights of access or public trust rights and areas which the
State of North Carolina has or may be authorized to preserve, conserve,
or protect.
C. Capacity of Community Facilities
Water and Sewer
The availability of public facilities is a major consideration in
land development. The absence of central water and sdwer services is a
constraint on land development. With these services, more areas could be

developed with a greater assurance that the enviroment would be protected.
Cape Carteret does not have central services at this time.
Primary Roads
r
The Town of Cane Carteret contains two primary state roads, including
Highways 24 and 58. These roads are generally in good condition and can
handle the present volume of traffic. Roads do not seers to be a constraint
to development in Cape Carteret. The fact that Cape Carteret is made up
of residential subdivisions has been a key factor in establishing adequate
traffic patterns throughout Cape Carteret.
Schools
The White Oak Elementary School, located in Cape Carteret, is nearing
capacity. Without proper emphasis on relieving this problem and those
of the other schools that supply the educational needs of the people of
Cape Carteret, development may be constrained.
The White Oak School currently has an enrollment of 592, a capacity
of approximately 600, and is served I,j 28 teachers. This school provides
educational services for grades Kindergarten through Eighth. The remainder
of the school children of Cape Carteret attend other County schools.
Police, Fire, and Rescue
These services are very important to the people of Cape Carteret.
Without these services, Cape Carteret would not be as desirable as it is
now. These facilities are providing adequate services to the people of
Cape Carteret. In order to continue to provide adequate services, the
Town of Cape Carteret must continually analyze the demand on these
services and plan for improvements or expansion of services before the
demand arises.
This section has brought out some or the characteristics of Cape Carteret that
may constrain development. Without proper understanding of these factors, development
in Cape Carteret may cause undesirable consequences. For complete information on
Geology and Soils, see Appendix I and related Soil Maps.

V. Estimated Demands
To properly',plan for the future the estimated demands on the land must be
considered and analyzed. This section will consider the demand for Land that will
stem from increased year-round population and the projected economic trends of Cape
Carteret. From this analysis, the future land needs for Cape Carteret, as well as
the demands that will be placed on community facilities will be analyzed.
A. Population and Economy
1. Population - After careful consideration of the land use objectives, policies,
and standards, as well as past and present.land use conditions and trends;
the following revised projected population conditions and trends are
expected to occur in Cape Carteret.
Estimated Population *
19660 l� 1M 1980 1985 2000 202
Cape Carteret 52 616 790 935 19113 4640 29373
* Population projection methodology: The 1985 and beyond estimates were
obtained by a straight line percentage method based on the 1970 to 1980
growth figures.
These growth estimates were up -dated by the Cape Carteret Planning Board and
the Town Board. The following discussion will indicate how each of these population
estimates were determined.
Relationship of Long Range Projections to the Desires of the People -
The public input received during the planning process for this Land
Development Plan has indicated that Cape Carteret should continue to develop
as a basically residential community. This was demonstrated by the question-
naires and at all of the public meetings. In addition, the public input seemed
to indicate to the Planning Board and Town Board that past growth trends were
desirable and could be expected to continue in the future. This expectation
of future growth was based on the built-in growth factor, that many of the
undeveloped lots in Cape Carteret were sold between 15 and 20 years ago to
individuals desiring to retire in Cape Carteret. This was one of the major
considerations for the ten (10) year increase from the 1975 figs

of 790 to an estimated 1985 figure of 1,113. At this rate, the -platted lots
will be approximately 66 percent developed in 20 years. The remaining growth
was projected on the basis that the 42 vacant acres would become basically
residential development. :3efore that time, the possibility of annexation
will have to be given considerable thought.
The Relationship of the Capabilities of the Land and Water to Support Projected Growth
In the determination of the estimated growth patterns, the capability of the
land and water to support the projected growth was a major consideration. This
consideration is especially important to all coastal areas such as Cape Carteret
because of the adjacent productive wetlands and the estuarine waters.
This determination is not easily made. Past development trends that indicate
over 42 percent of the platted areas are developed supports the idea that the
estimated development can be accommodated. It is assumed that with proper building
requirements and proper installation of septic tanks and wells, the Town of
Cape Carteret could develop as projected without affecting the environment
adversely.
The growth expected by Cape Carteret is not expected to have significant
affect on the water supply. The water supply for Cape Carteret is dependent on
the total amount used throughout Carteret County and - in fact - Eastern North
Carolina.
Anticipated Demands for Land - Based on the 10-year population increases,
it is anticipated that there trill be a demand for approximately 163 housing
units within that time. The majority of this development is expected to
occur in the Star Hill and Country Club Area, Inc., because of the availability
pf Jpts and recent development trends. Cape Carteret is not expected to
incur significant seasonal populations.
2. Economy
In addition to the demands on the land due to population increases, there
will also be additional demands for commercial land. It should be noted that the
public input specifically indicates that essential shopping facilities and services
are needed. but mainr r-nmmc+rnial development, s�kouH rot cteur it tl-Ae City I -~rats

There are approximately 33 acres oj' commercial land use in the city limits. It is
assumed that this will increase proportionally with the population. This means that
in ten years, approximately twelve additional acres (or less) of commercial develop-
ment can be expected. This.demand is not expected to place s-.gnificant demands on
the land and water of the area. This assumption is supported by the fact that the
commercial uses are expected to use only a small portion of the total developed land
during the 10 year period.
It should be noted that this estimate would be desirable, but the likelihood
of commercial development occurring in Cape Carteret is hard to determine.
The projected development of land in Cape Carteret will be contingent on the
over-all economic stability of Carteret County. One of the most important elements
of the economy of Carteret County is the availability of.significant civil service
job opportunities at Cherry Point and Camp Lejeune. These job opportunities are of
particular importance to Cape Carteret.
In addition, the future of the tourist industry throughout the County is
important to the development of Cape Carteret. The proper development of
Carteret County as a tourist center will enhance the desirability of Cape Carteret
as a place to live.
B. Community Facilities Demand
The five year population forecast of 1,113, which will be an additional '
178 people, will certainly make additional demands on the Town of Cape Carteret
for services.
Community Services - The 5-year estimated population will place added demands
on the fire and rescue services, the solid waste disposal, recreation, and
police services. There are no specific plans for up -dating these services
at this time. The projections within this plan have been conveyed to all
of these departments for review.
Schools - It should be noted that the White Oak Elementary School is nearing
capacity. The projection within this plan has been conveyed to the Carteret
Board of Education for their review.
Roads=lt'is estimated that..'xhe'projected:growth• of- Cape. Carteret

will place significant demands on Highways 24 and 58. The overall
development of Carteret County and Onslow County may place additional
demands on these roads.
- 40 -

VI. Plan Description
The Coastal Area Management Act requires that all of the land within the
twenty coastal counties be classified in one of five land classifications. This
classification is an attempt to identify areas that are expected to experience
similar growth patterns and demand similar services from the local government.
The five land classes includes
1. Developed
purposes The Developed class identifies developed lands which are present-
ly provided with essential public services. Consequently, it is distinguished
from areas where significant growth and/or new service requirements will occur.
Continued development and redevelopment should be encouraged to provide for
orderly growth in the area. This classification does not apply to the Town
of Cape Carteret.
Descriptions Developed lands are areas with a minimum gross population
density of 29000 people per square mile. At a minimum, these lands contain
public services including water and sewer systems, educational systems, and
road systems -- all of which are able to support the present population and
its accompanying land uses including commercial, industrial and institutional.
2. Transition
Purpose: The Transition class identifies lands where moderate to high
density growth is to be encouraged and where any such growth that is to be
encouraged and where any such growth that is permitted by local regulation
will be provided with the necessary public services.
Description: The area to be designated as Transition must be no
greater than that required to accommodate the estimated county population
growth at a minimum gross density of 21,000 people per square mile. In
addition, the minimum services which will be required are the necessary
water and sewer facilities, educational services, and roads. Consideration
must be given to the cost of public services in the Transition area. Each
local government is encouraged to estimate the cost of providing public

services where they do not already exist.
3. Community
Purposes The Community class identifies existing and new clusters of low
density development, not requiring major public services. This classification
does not apply to the Town of Cape Carteret.
Descriptions
A. The Community class includes existing clusters of one or more land uses
such as a rural residential subdivision or a church, school, general store,
industry, etc. (Cluster is defined as a number of structures grouped
together in association or in physical proximity. - (Webster's Dictionary) ).
B. This class will provide for all new rural growth when the lot size is ten
acres or less. Such clusters of growth may occur in new areas, or within
existing community lands.
C. New development in the Community class will be subject to subdivision
regulations under the Enabling Subdivision Act (G.S. 153A-330 et. seq.)
D. In every case, the lot site must be large enough to safely accommodate
on -site sewage disposal and, where necessary, water supply so that no
public sewer services will be required now or in the future.
E. Limited public services should be provided in the Community class,
such as public road access and electric power.
F. As a guide for calculating the amount of land necessary to accommodate
new rural community growth, a gross population density of 640 people
per square mile or one person per acre should be used.
4. Rural
Purposes The Rural class identifies lands for long-term management for
productive resource utilization, and where limited public services will be
provided. Development in such areas should be compatible with resource
production. This classification does not apply to the Town of Cape Carteret.,
Descriptions The Rural class includes all lands not in the Developed,

Transition, Community, and Conservation classes.
5- Conservation
Purpose: The Conservation class identifies land which should be main-
tained essentially in its natural state and where very limited or no public
services are provided.
Description: Lands to be placed in the Conservation class are the least
desirable for development because:
A. They are too fragile to withstand development without losing their
natural value; and/or
B. They have severe or hazardous limitations to development; and/or
C. Though they are not highly fragile or hazardous, the.natural resources
they represent are too valuable to endanger by development.
A11 of the local governments in Carteret County have worked together in
classifying the land within their jurisdiction.
The Coastal Area Management Act requires that the classification of the land
within the municipalities take into consideration the needs of the over-all County.
The classification of land throughout the County has attempted to identify adequate
amounts of all land classifications in order to acoo=. odate the anticipated demand
on the land for the next ten years. This will add to the coordination of growth
patterns throughout the entire county, and insure that all growth is planned, and
provided the necessary services. The Town of Cape Carteret has coordinated their
classification efforts with the County and considered the needs of the County, as
well as the Town of Cape Carteret.
The classification of land in Carteret County will also help coordinate and
encourage consistency between all local land use policies and those of the State.
The classification of land in the municipalities or any other area of the County ma y
need to., be changed from time to time. If this occurs, the needs of the entire
County, as well as the local area, must be considered with particular attention
to the services that will be demanded.
Cape Carteret Land Classification - Cape Carteret is an integral part

of the over-all County land classification system. The classification of land
within Cape Carteret has been based on the desires of the citizens, and will
be analyzed in the following discussion.
A. Transitional - All of the developable land within Cape Carteret has been
classified transitional. The classification of land is based on the expecta-
tion of moderate density and the development of essential services in 5 years.
The estimated demands section of this plan indicates that approximately
178 of the estimated population growth in the county are expected to locate
in Cape Carteret during the next 5 years. This will increase the population
of the town from 935 to 1,113. This population growth is consistent with
the desires of the people to continue to develop as a basically residential
community.
The existing conditions within Cape Carteret will help explain the basis
for this classification. The Town of Cape Carteret contains 19364 lots;
approximately 42% are developed. The 786 vacant lots indicate a built-in
growth factor of moderate density. The population estimates indicate that
Cape Carteret will be over 50% developed in 10 years. There are approximately
42 acres of vacant residential land within the city limits. Public desires
indicate any additional subdivisions of land should have lower density than
some of the older subdivisions.
The.land classification in Cape Carteret fits the general definitions
of Transitional, which is - land where local governments plan to accom7odate
moderate to hi;;h .deasi .% de-vLloprent during the next 10 years and where
necessary public services will be provided to accommodate that.gro-htth. The
classification does not meet the minimum gross density of 2000 ppleper
square mile. In 5 years the population of Cape Carteret will be 1,113 -
and.in 10 years 1,281 - for an area greater than one square mile. The fact
that almost all the development projected for Cape Carteret will be in the
form of moderate density subdivision development has been the deciding factor
in the classification of the land area of Cape Carteret as Transitional.

Other land classifications have been considered at public meetings, but the
nature of the development of the town indicates the need for a trazisitional
classification.
B. Conservation - The Conservation classifications identifies land which should
be maintained essentially in its natural state and where very limited or no
public services zre provided. In Cape Carteret, there are included wetlands,
estuarine erosine areas, and floodways as indicated on the Land Classification
Map.
The importance of these areas have been discussed in the Constraint
Section of this plan. Basically improper development in these areas Trill
cause undesirable effects. It should be noted that by classifying these
areas Conservation, the 'Town of Cape Carteret is NOT indicating development
should not occur in these areas. This classification indicates that these
areas are important to the town; and, if development occurs, it should
consider the effect the development will have on the objectives for local
planning and the effect these areas may have on the development. Careful
consideration of appropriate development in these areas has already begun.
- 4S -

0 G L J E S 0 U N D LAND CLASS MAP
CAPE CARTERET
PREPARED BY TAk CARTERET CITY LIMITS PLANNING AREA
L OLIN T Y PLA144 , NO DEPARTMENT. - - - - - - ---
PURSUANT COASTAL
AREA MANACEWth T ACT OF 1974 DATE: 4/7/75
SCALE I INCH=-100 FEET
3i y
anon
REVISED

VII. Policies
Land use policies serve several purposes. First, they act as guides for
desired future development and land use changes. In this sense, they may be
followed directly or used to interpret the more specific standards set out in
Town ordinances, such as the zoning ordinance. When used to interpret ordinances,
their function is to provide insight into the desired purpose of a particular
regulation so that its spirit is observed as carefully as its letter. However,
policies are not intended to taxe precedence over Town ordinances and do not
have the effect of ordinances. A second purpose is to serve as an expression
of Town opinion on land uses permitted within Areas of Environmental Concern.
They act as an accepted point of compromise between Federal and State agencies
and the Town. Broad community needs and needed cooperation from these agencies
are expressed in the policies. This purpose is central to the Coastal Area
Management Act's mandate of a land use planning process involving a partnership
between State and local governments. A third, and related use, is as a component
of State and Federal review of permits or grant app;ications. Development permits
must be consistent with local land use plans, as must be the expenditure of
Federal or State funds. These last two purposes pose potential sources of
conflict and of opportunity in the land use planning process.
The State Guidelines for Land Use Planning require that four major types of
policies be formulated where appropriate for that particular locality. These are
resource protection, resource production and management, economic and community
development, and continuting public participation. Within each of these areas
issues are to be defined, alternatives considered, and policies and methods of
implementation selected. Specific policies are to be stated on certain issues
within each of the broad policy areas. Small geographical area and relatively
fear AECIs make many of these issues inapplicable to Cape Carteret, for example.
The issue, importance of productive agricultural lands or minerals sites, is
inapplicable to Cape,Carteret.
- 47 -

I. Resource Protection Policies
A. Areas of Environmental Concern
Among the most important natural resources within Cape Carteret's
Jurisdiction are the Areas of Environmental Concern (GEC's) which are specif-
ically described in the Existing Land Use Analysis section of this plan.
Alternatives to development within Areas of Environmental Concern are strict-
ly limited by the regulations governing use of these areas promulgated under
the Coastal Area Management Act. The major policy choices and issues that
the Town must consider in developing land use policies for Areas of Environ-
mental Concern are (1) the degree to which these regulations may restrict
or prevent uses within AEC's that may have importance for the entire
community, or (2) whether the regulations are strict enough to protect the
natural and protective values found in the Areas of Environmental Concern.
The following policies further define these issues and establish the
Town's policies toward acceptable land uses within these areas.
ESTUARINE SYSTEM - Within the Estuarine System are included the Coastal
Wetlands, Estuarine Waters, Estuarine Shorelines, and Public Trust Areas.
The overriding issue with regard to establishing land use policies for
development within the estuarine system is what uses will interfere least
with the interdependent components of the system and will not upset the
natural balance and relationship of these components that creates public social
and economic values; and, to the extent that uses are permitted, how can these
uses be controlled so that if the natural working system is interfered with
superior public and economic values will be created by the allowed use? The
determination of these issues shall be governed by the following policies.
ESTUARINE SYSTEM POLICIES
(1) It shall be the policy of the Town to give high priority to the
protection and coordinated management of the estuarine system so as to safe-
guard and perpetuate its biological, social, economic, and aesthetic values;
- 48 -

and, to insure that any development occurring within the system is compatible
with natural characteristics so as to minimize the likelihood of significant
loss of private property and public resources
(2) Suitable uses shall be those consistent with the above policy and
highest priority shall be given to uses consistent with the conservation of
the estuarine system. Second priority will be given to those types of -develop-
ment that require water access but cannot function elsewhere. Examples of
acceptable uses include utility easements, docks, and facilities for public
recreation facilities such as community center buildings, parkss and play-
grounds, and similar facilities operated on a non-profit basis, if permitted
under the special use provisions of the Town zoning ordinance; private boat
ramps, provided that they are constructed so as not to divert or impede the
natural flow of water about and within the Town; private piers and docks,
provided they meet the construction standards.of the Town Code.
POLICY STATION
(1) The Town will adhere to all State and Federal regulations
dealing with the Estuarine Systems
(2) The Town will and does require that all buildings in ABC's
areas be at least seven (7) feet above seal level and at
least twenty-five (25) feet from the shoreline.
B. CONSTRAINTS TO DEVELOPMENT
In addition to Areas of Environmental Concern, certain areas exist
within the Town that have significant biologicals social, economics and
aesthetic values of local concern which could be lessened by careless
development. These are such areas as soil with high permeability and
seasonally high water tables. This last applies to the entire area of
the Town.
GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Because of the Town's lack of a central water system
or sewage disposal systems a possibility does exist of water pollution,
not only of individual wells, but of the surrounding estuarine waters from
— 49-

on -site sewage disposal systems. Although extensive studies have been
made regarding both a central water system and sewage system, these
studies do not indicate an immediate need for either because of low
densities. However, a possibility does exist of pollution of wells and
of the surrounding estuarine waters from on -site sewage disposal systems.
Thus the central issue is what types of development can be allowed and
under what conditions so that the danger of pollution is minimized. The
alternatives are to (1) permit unrestricted development or (2) allow
controlled development so the risks of degradation of wells and surrounding
waters are minimized. In two studies conducted by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency in 1975 and 1977, the conclusions reached were that
highly developed areas utilizing septic tank disposal systems would result
in groundwater pollution. While no pollution was found in the Town of
Cape Carteret, this area was not extensively monitored; similarity of soil
conditions studied indicate a substantial possibility of pollution at
high densities. The conclusion is that while there is no evidence of
significant well or estuarine system pollution at this time from septic
tanks being operated in the Town and none is likely to occur under
existing and projected growth rates, a definite possibility exists if
higher densities than that permitted under existing zoning is allowed.
For these reasons alternative 2, allowing controlled development to
minimize well and estuarine system pollution is accepted and the policies
hereinafter established set forth. For additional Geology and Soil
information, see Appendix I and accompanying maps.
POLICY - (1) The Town will insure that all dwellings constructed have
properly installed and functioning septic tanks.
(2) The Town will maintain the densities allowed under the Town
Zoning Ordinance in all residential districts fbr single-family dwellings
at existing levels.
- 50 -

IMPIAITATION - The above policies will be implemented by strict adherence
to the Town's Zoning Ordinance and by the Town Planning Board making
requests to appropriate State and Federal agencies for an evaluation of
surrounding water quality conditions and the effect of such development
within the Town. The Planning Board will carefully monitor and study
these water quality evaluations and keep the Town Council advised as to
the results; making recommendations for changes in policies that will
prevent further deterioration of water quality.
C. OTHER HAZARDOUS OR FRAGILE LAND AREAS
The Town of Cape Carteret has some flood hazard areas, mainly along
the southern shoreline of the Town. These.are indicated as V-zones by
the Federal Flood Insurance Program maps.
POLICY - The Town of Cape Carteret follows the County policy of requiring
i
buildings to be constructed above the flood line as stated by the
Federal Flood Insurance Program.
IMPLEMENTATION - The policy is regulated by the Town building inspector
(County Building Inspector).
D. HURRICANE AND FLOOD EVACUATION POLICIES
The Town of Cape Carteret does not feel that Hurricane and/or Flood
Evacuation is a relevant issue for the Town. However, the County
has designated the White Oak Elementary School in Cape Carteret as
a refugee area in case of an emergency.
II. RESOMICE PRODUCTION AND MANAGEMENT POLICIES
A. RECREATIONAL RESOURCES
The Town recognizes the needs of its residents for recreational
facilities other than the two existing water -access parks. The Town's
Subdivision Ordinance requires a certain portion of all new subdivisions
to be set aside for the use and enjoyment of the residents. In addition,
the Town will establish, where feasible, areas in established subdivisions
for the use and enjoyment of the children and youth of the Town.
- 51 -

POLICY - It is the policy of the Town to assure the health, happiness,
and safety of its residents by providing suitable areas for recreation and
play, and the Town will acquire such recreational areas as such new sub-
divisions are accepted or as such areas are made available in older sections.
POLICY - It is the policy of the Town to expand esisting services and the
development of those services required to maintain the standards desired
by the citizens of Cape Carteret, through: . -
A. Emphasizing the need for recreational facilities for all age groups,
(1) band use regulations that preserve those areas, such as
flood plain areas, that may be well -suited for recreational
uses to facilitate this idea.
(2) Include recreational area requirements within the subdivision
regulations in the event additional land is subdivided.
(3) Initiate a study to determine the possibility of acquiring
recreational areas and the possible sources of revenue that could
be used to acquire these areas.
(4) Encouraging improved communication efforts between the
Carteret County Recreation Department and the Carteret County
Board of Educatimn, to facilitate the optimum use of recreational
facilities in the Cape Carteret area.
IMPLEMENTATION - The Town will adhere to the Subdivision Ordinance in
acquiring certain portions of land which are required to be set aside
and used for recreational areas, and will continue to seek out and secure
the use of other such suitable areas.
B. FISHERY RESOURCES - Fishery Resources is not a relative issue for the Town of
1
Cape Carteret; therefore, this policy issue will not be addressed.
C. OFF -ROAD VEHICLES - Off -road Vehicles is not a relevant issue for the Town of
Cape Carteret; therefore, this policy issue will not be addressed.
D. AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY, ANDMIMG - Agriculture, forestry and mining issues are
not relevant issues for the Town of Cape Carteret; therefore, no policies
will be given ,on, these issued:
-52-

III. ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT POLICIES
Development policies for the Town of Cape Carteret are an extension and
expansion of the Natural Resource Policies previously stated and confirmation of
existing development policies found in the Town Ordinances. Four basic issues
present themselves - type, timing, location, and density of growth. The type
' of growth defines the relative mix of land uses - residential, commercials institu-
tional, conservation - and determines the basic nature of the community. Timing
of development, or when development will occur, is largely dependent upon the
availability of facilities. Location of development is determined by the desired
spatial relationship between land uses and physical constraints. Density deter-
mines the number of dwelling units allowable per unity of land. The interaction
of each of these determinants of land use shapes the pattern and character of the
Town and its environs. However, before policies for each of these issues can be
formulated broad alternative growth patterns must be considered and a general
growth objective selected.
ALTERNATIVES - For any community there are three basic choices to consider
in planning for future growth - no growth, unlimited growth, and a controlled
growth somewhere between the two extremes. Cape Carteret, as most communities
do, has indicated a preference for the third alternative - a controlled growth
designed to maintain the existing character of the Town while accepting
additional growth at present and projected development rates. This conclusion is
based on the opinions of residents and property owners as expressed in opinion
surveys, public meetings, and in existing policies. The citizen opinion survey,
as well as existing policies articulated in the Town Zoning Ordinances clearly
indicate a preference for maintaining the existing characters growth patterns,
and rates of development. Eighty-nine (89) percent of the respondents to the
citizen opinion survey indicated they want the growth of the Town to be Planned -
growth over the next ten years. Of the responses to development type and mix,
the overwhelming preference was for single-family residential over multi -family
development.
-53-

}
However, the responses indicated a desire to see more retail facilities. This
survey, the comments at public meetings, and existing policies, clearly indicate
a general urban growth policy of gradual and controlled increases in single-
family residential development,at existing growth rates, with limited supporting ^
retail services and uses. That these supporting business services and uses should
be limited to only those required to service existing and future single-family
development. In accordance with these issues and alternatives, the following
policies are adopted:
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT POLICY - It is the objective of the Town to adopt
policies and ordinances and take appropriate actions to promote the growth
and development of the Town of Cape Carteret as a predominately single-
family residential community, with limited supporting retail services and
uses; and, further, that the rate and location of growth and development
shall be consistent with the land use and population projections established
in this Plan and with the previously stated Natural Resources Policies.
The Town of Cape Carteret is still a newly developing area and, therefore,
does not have any areas needing redevelopment. To further define and
promote these objectives, the following policies are adopted:
POLICY ON TYPES OF DEVELOPMERNT - It shall be the policy of the Town to
allow single-family dwellings and business uses within the Town; business
uses necessary to service existing and future residential development
are the desired type. The Town of Cape Carteret does not feel that any
industry is a suitable type of development for the Town; furthermore,
the Town provides no zoning for this type of use.
POLICY ON LOCATION OF DEVELOPMENT - The location of development shall be
consistent with the Natural Resource Policies and the Town Zoning Ordinance.
The location of the various types of development are graphically illustrated
on the Land Classification Map.
POLICY ON TIMING AND DENSITY OF DEVELOPMENT - The timing of development,
that is hoer much development will be accepted during a given period, shall
- 514-

be consistent with the Natural Resource Policies, and the capacity of the
area's soils to accommodate water and sewer needs. The density of develop -
went or the number of persons per land unit shall be consistent with the
capacity and capability of the soils and surrounding water to accept
this development without destroying their ecological or aesthetic values.
To this extent density shall be consistent with the Town Zoning Ordinance
and the Natural Resource Policies. To insure that this consistency is
achieved, it is recommended that the Town Zoning Ordinance be strictly
adherred to.
IKPIDENTATION
(1) Develop land use regulations that prevent development that has a
high likelihood of affecting estuarine system areas of environ-
mental concern (AFC's).
(2) Continue to provide for a rual residential comminity that reflects
Cape Carteret's coastal nature through:
a. Land Use Regulations that provide for basically low density
residential uses.
b. Take all possible action to insure that any further widening
of Highway 24 beyond the present right-of-way be done in such
a manner that it does not interfere with the property rights
of the citizens of Cape Carteret.
B. SERVICES POLICY: - At this time the Town does not feel that a water system
or sewer system is necessary for development and will continue to use the
individual well and septic tank systems.
POLICY - Expand rescue, fire and police services as the population increases.
POLICY - Expand solid waste collection services as population increases.
` POLICY — Examine the cost of services and analyze all taxes, permits, and
fees to assure the citizens using services are bearing the major
costs of the services.
POLICY - Adopt land use regulations that provide for the development of
basic services and basic commercial shopping. These should

include such uses as retail food stores, service stations,
dry cleaners, hardware stores, banks, medical and dental offices.
C. CHANNEL MAINTENANCE POLICY - The Corps of Engineers maintains the inland
Waterway along the Cape Carteret shoreline.
D. ENERGY FACILITY SITING AND DEVELOPMENT POLICIES - The Town does not feel
that any activity related to energy development is suitable for the Town.
E. BEACH AND WATERFRONT ACCESS POLICIES - While the Town includes no areas
touching upon the ocean or its beaches, it does have a vital interest in
assuring that its people have access to the ocean, beaches, and sounds.
A study conducted for the Town by Coastal Consultants, Ltd., in 1980
indicates a desire by many of the residents of Cape Carteret to have
free and easy access -to the recreational opportunities afforded by the
beaches and ocean; that present costs to provide such access are prohibi-
tive for the Town; that the State of North Carolina has a vital interest in
assuring its citizens continued access to the ocean, beaches, and sounds,
and is seeking solutions to the problems involved.
The Town of Cape Carteret, having one of its borders Bogus Sound,
recognizes the expressed needs and desires of its residents for continued
access for fishing, boating, and other water -related recreational facilities
of the Sound. To assure continued access to the Sound, the Town has leased
two (2) areas'of land to be used as recreational parks and boat launching
areas. The on -going leased parks and boat ramps are lighted and well
maintained by the Town. To assure continued access to the Sound, the
Town adopts the following policy:
POLICY - It is the policy of the Town that existing on -going leased
parks and water -access areas will be maintained in a manner to insure
protection, safety, and the well-being of those who use the facilities
provided.
IM MENTATION - The Town will maintain the parks and ramps in a
safe conditidn and will seek to constantly improve and enhance these
areas for the use and enjoyment of the people. The Town will continue
—5(0-

to lease these areas until such time as the Town can acquire full
ownership.
F: COMMITMENT TO FEMUL AND STATE PROGRAMS POLICY - The Town of Cape
Carteret supports ail,State and Federal policies applicable to the Town,
as listed in the Current Plans, Policies, and Regulations Section
of this Plan.
IV. CONTINUING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION POLICIES - The most fundamental objective of
democratic practice is to insure that public policies correspond closely with
the needs and preferences of affected citizens, and to prevent government from
overstepping the bounds of its limited authority. Such an objective must
acknowledge and respect the primary purpose of public participation -
increasing the responsiveness and accountability of government to citizens
affected by public decisions. Because of the great sensitivity to land use
governance, public participation programs should be responsive to the
individual property owner as well as the general public.
The Town of Cape Carteret used a public participation program consisting
of three basic components: (1) education, (2) public participation, and (3)
governmental accountability. In preparation, the public must be educated on
the basic concepts and processes of decision making; and notified of opportuni-
ties to participate. The primary objective of the education component is to
improve comprehension and communication between affected citizens and local
officials. The second component, public participation, requires two things:
(1) identification of policy options, and (2) estimating support from the
public for each alternative. The planners' responsibility is to help structure
the public debate by highlighting common viewpoints and weeding out policy
options that are not feasible on technical, legal, or other grounds. The final
component, accountability, requires that the rationale for particular policy
decisions be explained and opportunities be provided for testing decisions for
fairness and responsiveness.
Within this frame work several issues trust be addressed in establishing
policies for public participation. First, who is the "public" toward which
�51�

participation efforts will be directed? In a typical small residential
conmiunity, the affected may include such groups as property -owing residents,
non -property owing residents (renters and persons living with their parents
or relatives), and non-resident property owners (absentee owners). Each
of these segments of the public will be affected to some degree by the
actions and policies of the Town and each has certain participation rights.
The second issue in designing a mechanism for participation is what
priorities should be given to each of the affected groups in allocation of
time and resources. While each group is entitled to participate and express
an opinion, resources for participation are not unlimited and efforts must
be directed toward.the public most immediately affected. Finally, given
the resources available and the social and economic composition of the
particular locality, the issue of what methods will most efficiently and
effectively gain the needed participation from the various segments of the
public must be decided. Methods used by other agencies and local govern -
meets in the past have included such diverse techniques as: Speakers' bureaus
brochures, new media coverage, depositing information in local public places.
public notices, registries of interested individuals, mass mailings, advisor y
groups, nominal group technique, gaming simulation, surveys, and systemic
distribution of successive draft plans to a panel of citizen reviewers.
Many of these methods will have only limited application, if any, to the
Towm of Cape Carteret, and the policies that follow are intended to address
the issues defined above and select methods suitable to the Town's
political character and population size.
POLICY - It is the policy of the Town to assure that all resident
property owners have equal participation status in land use or other public
decisions that may affect them. However, while full participation rights
shall be afforded to all citimens,.the Town's first responsibility shall be
to permanent residents.
POLICY - In recognition of the inability of some persons to participate
_SB-

in the land planning process because of physical infirmity or job conflict, it
shall be the policy of the Town to utilize a variety of public education and
participation techniques. These techniques shall include citizen surveys,
public meetings, and workshops, use of ail news media to the extent that
cooperation can be obtained, required public hearings and draft review.
POLICY - It is the policy of the Town to follow a continuing land use
planning process of problem identification, data collection, development of
alternatives, policy formulation, development of implementation strategies,
and monitoring.
IMPIMIENTATION - In pursuit of the above policies, the following methods
of implementation will be used:
(1) In addition to required public hearings, no fewer than two public
meetings and workshops will be held to discuss land use policies and
alternatives.
(2) Citizen surveys, both written and phoned, will be used so that
citizens unable to attend meetings and workshops will have an opportunity
to express their opinions.
(3) Draft copies will be circulated to local officials for review and
made available to the general public at the Town Hall.
(4) To insure that the land use planning process is continuous the
Town will conduct reviews of the policies set'out in this plan and
encourage a high level of public participation during the review process.
The purpose of the reviews will be to evaluate the effect of the
policies on land use changes that have occurred or may be anticipated.
The Town, through either the Town Council or the Planning Board, shall
either make a findig that no changes are necessary or make recommendations
for necessary changes.
(5) In addition to the above public education and participation
techniques, several optional methods may be used by the Town to the
extent time and resources permit. The purpose of these optional
techniques is to (1) re-inforce and suuDlement other methods. and

(2) to provide additional participation opportunities for persons who are
unable to attend meetings or workshops because of work conflicts or
difficulty with physical mobility (elderly and handicapped).
These techniques may include distribution of educational sheets and
taping of meetings and workshops so that interested individuals may
replay them at the Town Hall. The emphasis will always be for the
interests of the citizens of Cape Carteret to be represented,on the
planning board, as well as the County planning board.
(6) Request appointed and elected officials to communicate frequently
with all County elected and appointed Boards.

16
yjn,. MAJOR CONCLUSIONS
The development of this.updated plan has taken approximately two year€.
During that period of time as much information as possible -concerning the current
land use, the population, and the eoonomy was collected. At the same time,
questionnaires were being distributed and pubUo meetings were held. The data
collected and the results of the questionnaires were used in public meetings to
help participants become aware of the feelings of other citizens. Finally, the
Cape Carteret Planning Board and the Town Board began to detect consistent trends
in the input that was being received. After due consideration, policies evolvod
and included in study, and the up -dated Plan was adopted by the Town Board,
incorporating the trends they have detected in written and discussion form.
In general, this Plan indicates the citizens of Cape Carteret area ploaced
with their basically residential town. bike most other Eastern North Carolina
areas, Cape Carteret will certainly be subject to many growth pressures during
the planning period. It is hoped this Plan will aid the Planning Board and the
Town Board in making decisions that will allow the Town of Cape Carteret to
maintain those characteristics that are important to the citizens and residonts.
It is Important that this plan is impl atnented properly. Tho decitdon-mocking
process must be based on the desires of the citizens that are expressed in this
plan. band development tools such as the zoning ordinance and subdivision
regulations should be reviewed to assure they are based on the objectives for
local planning.
The implementation of the Land Classification System will be an important
elcment of the planning process. Cape Carteret is an integral part of tho over-
all County classification system and must continue efforts to coordinate the
planning of Cape Carteret with the over-all planning of Carteret County.
Finally, Cape Carteret continues to coordinate efforts with the Coastal
Resources Commission to properly protect the areas that were determined to be
Areas of Environmental Concern. This is vitally important to the future of
Cane Carteret and the Coastal Area of North Carolina.

I2. City -County Plan
Relationship
f
The Coastal Area Management Act requires that all municipal
plans are an integral part of the County plans. This is very
important to the success of the Act. The Town of Cape Carteret
has attempted to insure the conistency of this plan with the
Carteret County Plan throughout the planning process.
The final assurance that this plan for the Town of Cape
Carteret is consistent with the County plan will be when the
Carteret County Coamii.ssioners review this plan for approval
with all of the municipal plans in the County for consistency.
The results of this analysis indicate that in the opinion of
the Cape Carteret Board of Commissioners, the County plan and
the Cape Carteret Plan are consistent.
- 6Z