Land Use Plan-1997

TOWN OF BURGAW
NORTH CAROLINA
1997 LAND USE PLAN
Adopted by the Burgaw Board of Commissioners: December 8, 1998
Certified by the Coastal Resources Commission: January 29, 1999
Prepared By:
Holland Consulting Planners, Inc.
Wilmington, North Carolina
The preparation of this document was financed in part through a grant provided by the
North Carolina Coastal Management Program, through funds provided by the Coastal
Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, which is administered by the Office of
Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration.

TOWN OF BURGAW
LAND USE PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I Pia e
PREFACE........................................................ 1
SECTION I:
ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
A. INTRODUCTION ............................................
I-1
B. POPULATION, HOUSING, AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS ..............
I4
1.
Permanent Population .....................................
a. Regional and County ................................
1-4
1-4
b Town of Burgaw
1-4
2.
c. Composition and Age ................................
Housing Characteristics ....................................
1-7
I-13
3.
Summary
I-19
C. ECONOMY.................................................I-19
1.
Regional Economy
I-19
2.
Local Economy ........................................
1-22
D. EXISTING LAND USE .........................................
I-29
1.
General Land Use Patterns ..................................
I-29
2.
Residential
1-32
3.
Industrial .............................................
I-32
4.
5.
Commercial...........................................I-33
Recreational
1-34
6.
Government/Institutional...................................1-34
7.
8.
Vacant/Agricultural......................................1-34
Annexation Activity ......................................
1-35
9.
Land Use Issue Identification ................................
1-35
10.
11.
Existing Ordinances and Land Use Controls .......................
Basinwide Water Quality Management ..........................
1-36
1-41
E. LAND AND WATER USE COMPATIBILITY ANALYSIS .................
1-43
1.
2.
Significant Land Compatibility Problems .........................
Problems from Unplanned Development .........................
1-43
1-44
3.
Areas Experiencing or Likely to Experience Major Land Use Changes ..
1-44
F. DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINTS: PUBLIC FACILITIES .................
I-45
1.
Water Supply ...........................................
1-45
2.
Sewage Disposal
1-47
3.
Drainage ..............................................
1-48
4.
Solid Waste Disposal
I-50
5.
Police ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
1-52
6.
Fire Protection ..........................................
I-52
7.
8.
Administration ..........................................
Transportation
I-53
I-53
9.
Emergency Rescue .......................................
1-56
Table of Contents 1
I

Paae
10.
Electrical Distribution .....................................
I-56
11.
Telephone Service .......................................
I-56
12.
Cable Television ........................................
I-56
13.
Schools..............................................I-57
14.
Recreation............................................I-58
15.
Health Services .........................................
I-58
G. DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINTS: LAND SUITABILITY .................
1. Topography/Geology.....................................I-59
I-59
2.
Flood Hazard Areas ......................................
I-60
3.
4.
Soils................................................I-60
Manmade Hazards/Restrictions ...............................
I-65
5.
Fragile Areas ...........................................
I-67
a. 404 Wetlands .....................................
I-67
b. Slopes in Excess of 12 %
I-68
C. Excessive Erosion Areas ..............................
I-68
d. Historic and Archaeological Sites ........................
I-68
e. Natural Resource Fragile Areas .........................
I-69
6.
Areas of Resource Potential .................................
I-69
a. Agricultural and Forestlands ...........................
I-69
b. Public Parks ......................................
I-69
C. Marine Resources ..................................
I-70
SECTION II: PROJECTED LAND DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS
A. PROJECTED DEMAND FOR DEVELOPMENT ........................
II-1
1. Permanent Population .....................................
a. Regional and County ................................
II-1
II-1
b. Town of Burgaw...................................
II-3
2. Housing Trends .........................................
3. Public Land Use .........................................
H-5
II-6
4. Commercial Land Use .....................................
II-6
5. Industrial Land Use .......................................
H-7
6. Transportation ..........................................
II-8
7. Annexation ............................................
II-8
8. Summary .............................................II-9
B. PROJECTED PUBLIC FACILITIES NEEDS/AVAILABILITY ...............
II-9
C. REDEVELOPMENT ISSUES ....................................
II-12
D. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION AND IMPLEMENTATION .....
II-12
SECTION III: LAND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM ..........................
III-1
SECTION IV: POLICY STATEMENTS I
A.
INTRODUCTION TO POLICY STATEMENTS .......................
IV-1
B.
C.
VISION STATEMENT ........................................
RESOURCE PROTECTION POLICIES .............................
IV-1
IV-2
D.
RESOURCE PRODUCTION AND MANAGEMENT POLICIES .............
IV-7
Table of Contents
2 '
I

I
E. ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT POLICY STATEMENTS .. IV-8
F. CONTINUING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION POLICIES .................. IV-15
G. STORM HAZARD MITIGATION, POST -DISASTER RECOVERY,
AND EVACUATION PLANS ................................... IV-15
SECTION V: RELATIONSHIP OF POLICIES AND LAND CLASSIFICATIONS
A. DEVELOPED CLASS .......................................... V-1
B. URBAN TRANSITION CLASS .................................... V-1
C. LIMITED TRANSITION CLASS .................................. V-1
D. CONSERVATION CLASS V-1
TABLES
Table 1
Table 2
Town of Burgaw Population, 1950-1996 ..................
Town of Burgaw 1990 Population by Age, Race, and Sex .......
I-7
I-8
Table 3
Table 4
Town of Burgaw and Pender County Population by Race, 1990 ...
Town of Burgaw 1996 Population by Age, Race, and Sex Estimates
I-8
I-9
Table 5
Town of Burgaw 1990 Educational Attainment by Race and Hispanic
Table 6
Origin.........................................
Town of Burgaw Housing Tenure and Vacancy,
1980, 1990, and 1997 ...............................
I-12
I-13
Table 7
Town of Burgaw Year Structure Built by Tenure, 1997 .........
I-14
Table 8
Town of Burgaw Units in Structure by Tenure, 1990
I-14
Table 9
Table 10
Town of Burgaw Housing Values, 1990 ...................
Town of Burgaw Housing Conditions, 1990 ................
I-15
I-16
Table 11
CAMA-Regulated Counties, One, Five, and Ten -Year Composite
Rankings of Economic Development ..........
I-21
Table 12
Town of Burgaw Median Income, 1989 ...........
I-22
Table 13
Table 14
Town of Burgaw Household, Family, and Nonfamily Income, 1989
Town of Burgaw Poverty Status in 1989 by Race and Hispanic
Origin by Age ....................................
I-22
I-24
Table 15
Town of Burgaw Employed Persons (16 Years Old and Over) by
Industry
I-24
Table 16
Town of Burgaw and Pender County Travel Time to Work, Workers
16 Years and Over .................................
I-26
Table 17
Town of Burgaw Government Revenue Data ................
I-28
Table 18
Town of Burgaw Planning Jurisdiction Estimated Land Use Acreage,
April 1998......................................
I-30
ITable of Contents
3
r

I
Paee
Table 19
Town of Burgaw Annexation Activity Summary, 1993-1997 .....
I-35
Table 20
Town of Burgaw Water System Summary of Wells and Storage
Table 21
Tanks .........................................
Town of Burgaw Water Use, 1996 ......................
I-45
I-46
Table 22
Watershed Sub -basin 03-06-23 NPDES Permits ..............
I-48
Table 23
Town of Burgaw Quick Waste Stream Analysis ..............
I-51
Table 24
Schools Serving the Town of Burgaw Enrollment Comparison and
Table 25
Capacity.......................................
Town of Burgaw Soil Characteristics .....................
I-57
I-63
Table 26
Burgaw Area Tier Two Reporters, 1995 ...................
I-66
Table 27
Total Population and Percent Change for CAMA-Regulated Counties
and State, 1996-2010 ...............................
II-1
Table 28
Pender County Summary of Population Characteristics Forecasts,
2000-2010......................................
II-2
MAPS
MAP
Map 1
Regional Location Map ... ......................
3
Map 2
Map 3
Generalized Location of Substandard Housing Units ...........
Town of Burgaw Existing Land Use .....................
I-18
I-31
Map 4
Floodprone Areas .................................
I-49
Map 5
1996 Average Annual Daily Traffic Counts ................
I-55
Map 6
Town of Burgaw Flood Hazard Map .....................
I-61
Map 7
Town of Burgaw Soils Map ...........................
NCDOT Transportation Improvement Plan Project R-3302
I-62
II-11
Map 8
......
Map 9
Town of Burgaw Land Classification Map .................
III-2
FIGURES
Figure 1
CAMA-Regulated Counties, Summary of Year -Round Population
Growth, 1990-1996................................
I-5
Figure 2
Pender County, Summary of Year -Round Population Growth,
1990-1996......................................
I-6
Figure 3
Pender County Forecasted Year -Round Population Growth, 1996-
2010..........................................
II-4
GRAPHS
Graph 1
Age Composition, Burgaw and Pender County ..............
I-10
Graph 2
Racial Composition, Burgaw and Pender County .............
I-11
4 '
1
Table of Contents
i

Appendix I
Appendix II
Appendix III
Appendix IV
I
1
1,
1
1
I
APPENDICES
Summary of 1993 Land Use Plan Policy Statements
Burgaw Zoning District Definitions and Table of Permitted Uses
Policies Considered But Not Adopted
Town of Burgaw Citizen Participation Plan
Page
ITable of Contents 5 1

PREFACE
This update is being undertaken to respond to the North Carolina Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA)
which requires the update of CAMA land use plans every five years. While this update is mandated by
legislation, there are broader and more important reasons to engage in the planning process. Basically,
planning begins with understanding your community and its people and learning how to care for them.
Municipal plans and planning affect people's lives. Tough choices must be made about the natural,
manmade, and financial resources in the community. The municipal budget should be compared to the
municipal plan to ensure that public money will be spent in accordance with the community's goals and
objectives.
The planning process also serves to educate us about ourselves, our attitudes towards others, and our
willingness to share a sense of community. Planning is often promoted as a means of community decision -
making through public participation. But planning also may involve conflict and friction because it may
divide us into opposing groups. Some conflict in the planning process is good. It stimulates us to think
and reminds us of the need to understand and tolerate, and even support, the opinions of others.
A community should not undertake the preparation of a land use plan without understanding that a plan
should be:
1. Comprehensive in setting goals and objectives for all aspects of the
community.
2. Part of a continuous planning process that is timely and responsive to the
needs and desires of the community.
3. The legal basis for land use regulations and a guide for a capital
improvements plan for municipal budgeting.
There are commonly accepted reasons both to plan and not to plan. These should be understood, and are
summarized as follows:
Reasons Not To Plan
�" -- Do not expect a plan to produce immediate changes.
-- Do not plan because you believe it will be a solution to
-- business/industrial recruitment.
Do not plan simply because it is the popular thing to do.
-- Do not adopt a plan to accomplish limited or single purpose
-- goals.
Do not plan to reform government. Planning is not a solution to
bad politics.
1
Preface 1

Reasons to Plan
-- To promote common sense and intelligent community thought.
-- For sound community management (i.e., to manage development
and public infrastructure).
-- To protect property values.
-- To encourage citizen participation.
-- To coordinate commercial/industrial development to other
public/private development activities.
-- To direct the physical appearance of the municipality.
-- To promote regional intergovernmental cooperation.
-- To promote a community pride.
Once the plan is prepared, the community must realize that the plan is not the end of the process. A
community must continuously work at accomplishing plan implementation and establishing an effective
planning program. The Town of Burgaw must view the preparation of this document as the first step in
a continually evolving process.
f]
1
fl
E
Preface 2 1 a

I
1
1
TWENTY CAMA COUNTIES
REGIONAL LOCATION MAP
MAP 1
The preparation of this map was financed in part
through a grant provided by the North Carolina
Coastal Management Program, through funds provided
by the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972. as
amended, which is administered by the Office of
Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Preface 3 1

I
ASECTION I: ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
A. INTRODUCTION
The existing Town of Burgaw CAMA Land Use Plan was prepared from October, 1992, to September,
1993, and certified by the Coastal Resources Commission on November 19, 1993. That plan was prepared
r in conformance with 15A NCAC 7B CAMA planning guidelines, as amended November 1, 1989.
During 1995 and 1996, the 15A NCAC 7B CAMA planning guidelines were further revised. The revised
guidelines included new requirements for the development of policy statements. These changes included
the following policy statement additions:
-- A general vision policy statement describing the type of community that the local
government would like to become within the next ten years.
-- A basic statement of the community attitude toward resource protection.
-- A policy addressing the protection of wetlands identified as being of the highest functional
significance on maps supplied by the Division of Coastal Management.
-- A policy addressing moorings and mooring fields.
-- A policy addressing water quality problems and management measures designed to reduce
or eliminate local sources of surface water quality problems.
-- A statement of the community attitude toward resource production and management.
-- A policy addressing commitment to state and federal programs, including housing
rehabilitation, community development block grants, housing for low and moderate
income level citizens, water and sewer installation, and rural water systems.
-- A policy addressing assistance in interstate waterways.
This land use plan update has been prepared in compliance with the revised guidelines dated March 5,
1996.
The 7B guidelines define the following intent of land use plans:
"Local governments, through the land use planning process, address issues and adopt
policies that guide the development of their community. Many decisions affecting
development are made by other levels of government, and local policies must consider and
be consistent with established state and federal policies. Most development -related
decisions, however, are primarily of local concern. Policies which address the type of
development to be encouraged, the density and patterns of development, and the methods
of providing public access to beaches and waterfronts are examples of these local policy
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-1 '

decisions. When such development issues are carefully and explicitly addressed in the
local Land Use Plan, other levels of government will follow local policies in their actions
that affect these issues. State and federal agencies will use the local Land Use Plans and
policies in making project consistency, funding, and permit decisions."
"The land use plan shall contain the following basic elements:
1) a summary of data collection and analysis;
2) an existing land use map;
3) a policy discussion;
4) a land classification map. "
In addition to these basic elements, the 7B guidelines require that the following issues be addressed in the
plan:
1) Resource Protection
2) Resource Production and Management
3) Economic and Community Development
4) Continuing Public Participation
5) Storm Hazard Mitigation, Post -Disaster Recovery and Evacuation Plans
This land use plan provides a guide for development of the Town of Burgaw by addressing issues and
adopting policies that are relevant to the town. Specifically, this land use plan includes the following
eleven elements which are mandated by the 7B guidelines:
1) Executive Summary
2) Introduction
3) Goals and Objectives
4) Data Collection and Analysis
5) Present Conditions
6) Constraints
7) Estimated Demands
8) Policy Statements
9) Land Classification
10) Intergovernmental Coordination and Implementation
11) Public Participation
It should be noted that the policy section of the plan is the most important part of the document. State and
federal agencies will use the local land use policies in making project consistency, funding, and permit
decisions.
The 1993 Town of Burgaw Land Use Plan included policy statements which addressed the five policy
areas. However, there are no state -defined Areas of Environmental Concern (AEC) located within
Burgaw's planning jurisdiction. Those areas as defined by 15A NCAC 7H include: coastal wetlands,
estuarine waters, public trust areas, estuarine shorelines, ocean hazard areas, public water supplies, and
natural and cultural resource areas.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-2 1

CAMA planning guidelines require that the existing (1993) policy statements be summarized in this
document. Appendix I provides a summary of the 1993 policy statements. It should be stressed that
Appendix I does not provide the 1993 policies in their entirety.
Effectiveness of 1993 Policies
It is the town's opinion that it has been especially successful with the implementation of the following
policies:
-- The town has revised its subdivision ordinance to require the designation of 404 wetland
areas, as determined by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, on all subdivision plats.
-- The town has adopted a thoroughfare plan.
-- The town is currently working on the preparation of a stormwater ordinance.
-- Extension of water and sewer services into recently annexed areas.
-- Redevelopment/preservation of the central business district (the town completed a
Downtown Revitalization Plan in 1993).
-- Progress toward rehabilitation of substandard housing.
-- Provision of services to accommodate new residential, commercial, and industrial
development within the town's planning jurisdiction.
The Town of Burgaw has not been particularly successful with the implementation of the following 1993
policies:__
The town has not completed a comprehensive plan for recreational sites or facilities.
-- Only similar land uses will be encouraged around industrial uses, industrial parks, and
sandpits (the town's zoning is not consistent with this statement in all cases).
-- Desire to develop affordable housing.
Listed below are some of the sources and documents utilized during preparation of this Land Use Plan:
- Pender County Land Use Plan Update
-- Town of Burgaw 1993 Land Use Plan Update
1 =_ USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Pender County
NCDOT, Planning and Policies Section
-- Town of Burgaw Staff
Pender County Schools
North Carolina Office of State Budget and Management
-- North Carolina Office of State Planning
1995 Town of Burgaw Thoroughfare Plan
North Carolina Division of Archives and History
-- Town of Burgaw Zoning Ordinance
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-3 ,
[I

-- Town of Burgaw Subdivision Ordinance
-- North Carolina Division of Community Assistance
-- North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
-- North Carolina Department of Commerce.
-- Town of Burgaw Municipal Code
These sources were supplemented by "windshield" surveys conducted in December, 1997, and April,
1998, to obtain data on existing land use patterns and housing conditions.
B. POPULATION, HOUSING, AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
1. Permanent Population
a. Regional and County
Sixteen of the twenty North Carolina counties affected by the Coastal Area Management
Act (CAMA) experienced a net permanent population growth from 1990 to 1996. The
four counties that experienced negative population growth were Hertford, Hyde, Tyrrell,
and Washington. Between 1990-1996, Pender County's population grew faster than any
other CAMA county. In addition, in 1996, Pender County was the seventh largest CAMA
county. Figure 1 provides a summary of year-round population growth for CAMA
counties between 1990-1996.
As Figure 2 indicates, the majority of the growth that took place in Pender County
between 1990-1996 occurred in the incorporated portions of the county. However, the
population located in unincorporated areas also experienced significant growth during the
six year period. This trend is most likely partially attributable to annexations which
increased the incorporated population rather than an out -migration of individuals from
unincorporated areas.
b. Town of Burgaw
Figure 2 also indicates that from 1990-1996, the Town of Burgaw was the fastest growing
municipality in the county, increasing 67.7%. In addition, with a 1996 population of
3,519, Burgaw more than quadruples the population of the second largest municipality in
the county (Surf City (part) 809 persons).
During the six year period from 1990-1996, the town's growth rate exceeded that of any
other period since 1950. Table 1 provides a summary of Burgaw's population growth
since 1950.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-4 1 1

on so an r M 40 W. M Noaw go: M an so ow go = g
Figure 1
CAMA-Regulated Counties
Summary of Year -Round Population Growth, 1990-1996
Percent
Year -Round Population Chanqe
Municipality
1990
1996
'90=96
Beaufort
42,283
43,210
2.2%
Bertie
20,388
20,532
0.7%
Brunswick
50,985
62,656
23.3%
Camden
5,904
6,356
7.7%
Carteret
52,553
58,341
11.0%
Chowan
13,506
14,152
4.8%
Craven
81,613
87,174
6.8%
Currituck
13,736
16,372
19.2%
Dare
22,746
26,542
16.7%
Gates
9,305
9,864
6.0%
Hertford
22,523
22,214
-1.4%
Hyde
5,411
5,191
-4.1 %
New Hanover
120,284
143,430
19.2%
Onslow
149,838
150,216
0.3%
Pamlico
11,368
12,010
5.6%
Pasquotank
31,298
33,848
8.1%
Pender
28,855
35,978
24.7%
Perquimans
10,447
10,756
3.0%
Tyrrell
3,856
3,671
-4.8%
Washington
13,997
13,504
-3.5%
Total
710,896
776,217
9.2%
North Carolina
6,632,448
7,323,085
10.4%
■ 1990 O 1996
160,000
150,000
140,000
130,000 -
120,000
110,000 --
C 100,000 -
0 90,000
80,000 -
g 70,000
a 60,000
50,000 -- --
40,000
30,000 - -
20,000
10,000
0
_N Y C c c dC N N C c
0
m m 2 U U U a U ' m _ _ O r a c fT y
m V is N f0
z
a a
Municipality
Source: North Carolina Office of State Planning; extrapolation of data for unincorporated areas by Holland Consulting Planners, Inc.
I-5

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Figure 2
Pender County
Summary of Year -Round Population
Growth, 1990-1996
Year -Round
Percent
Population
Change
Municipality
1990
1996
'90296
Atkinson
275
301
9.5%
Burgaw
2,099
3,619
67.7%
St. Helena
321
353
10.0%
Sloop Point
27
21
-22.2%
Surf City (part)
653
809
23.9%
Topsail Beach
346
434
25.4%
Wallace (part)
28
32
14.3%
Watha
154
171
11.0%
Total Municipalities
3,903
5,640
44.5%
Total Unincorporated Areas
24,952
30,338
21.6%
Total County
28,855
35,978
24.7%
1990 ❑ 1996
3,750
3,500
3,250
3,000
2,750
0
2,500
2,250
v
o.
c
a
2,000
1,750
1,500
1,250
1,000
750
500
250
ACE-=
0
w
Q
rn a�
m 2
U
o C� r
ELL It a
o
o
am — m
Fo- m > n
Municipality
Source: North Carolina Office of State Planning; extrapolation of data for
unincorporated areas by Holland Consulting Planners, Inc.
I-6

J
Table 1
Town of Burgaw
Population 1950-1996
Year
Population
Numeric
Change
% Change
1950
1,613
--
--
1960 '
1970 '
1,750
1,744
+ 137
6
+ 8.5 %
- 0.3 %
1980 '
1,738
- 6
- 0.3 %
19902
1996 2
2,099*
3,519
+ 361
+20.8 %
+67.7%
+1,420
*This figure as supplied by the Office of State Planning is at variance with the
1990 U.S. Census population figure of 1,807.
Sources: ' 1990 United States Census.
2 N.C. Office of State Planning.
As Table 1 indicates, Burgaw experienced minor population decreases during the 1960s
and 1970s. However, the population increases during the 1980s and 1990s more than
compensated for this brief period of population decline. As a result of this growth, the
town's population was twice as large in 1996 as it was in 1970. The town's recent
population boom can largely be attributed to the opening of Interstate 40 in June, 1990.
In addition, and partially attributed to 1-40, industrial development has occurred in
Burgaw which has also fostered population growth.
C. Composition and Age
The Office of State Planning does not estimate population by race, sex, or age for
municipalities during intercensal years. As a result, much of the population, housing, and
economic data that is included in this update was also included in Burgaw's 1993 CAMA
Land Use Plan Update. However, in some cases, 1996 estimates have been provided in
this update based on trends experienced in 1990.
Table 2 indicates that the largest segment of Burgaw's 1990 population was the 65 and up
age group which comprised almost 26 % of the town's total population. In addition,
approximately 17 % of the town's population was considered to be school -aged (5-17) and
almost 20% was of the primary child-bearing age (18-34). The median age for the town
in 1990 was 40.7 compared to 27.8 for the state and 38.6 for Pender County. However,
it should be noted that since 1990, a large portion of the town's in -migration of population
is attributed to industrial growth and is comprised of working age people.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-7 '

Table 2
Town of Burgaw
1990 Population by Age, Race, and Sex
Total Persons
White
Black
% of
Total
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
0-4
93
5.2
44
49
48
20
28
42
23
19
5-17
306
16.8
163
143
179
90
89
125
73
52
18-24
112
6.2
69
43
57
34
23
55
35
20
25-34
242
13.4
141
102
138
72
66
97
63
34
35-39
135
7.5
65
70
92
45
47
37
16
21
40-44
106
5.9
56
50
74
43
31
32
13
19
45-64
346
19.2
159
187
215
99
116
128
57
71
65+
467
25.8
128
339
343
97
246
124
31
93
Total
1,807
824
983
1,146
500
646
640
311
329
Median*
40.7
34.8
49.7
44.0
38.8
52.4
35.1
28.5
44.9
*Derived from grouped data; may not agree with publications.
Source: Preliminary 1990 U.S. Census Data.
Table 3 provides a comparison between the Town of Burgaw's and Pender County's racial
composition. In 1990, the Town of Burgaw's population distribution closely resembled
that of Pender County as a whole. The major difference in town versus county racial
composition is that Burgaw's African American population occupied a slightly larger
portion of the total population than the county's (35% Burgaw, 30% Pender County).
Table 3
Town of Burgaw and Pender County
Population by Race, 1990
Town of Burgaw
Pender County
% of
% of
Race
Total
Total
Total
Total
White
1,146
63 %
19,782
69 %
Black
640
35 %
8,771
30 %
American Indian/Eskimo/Aleut
0
0 %
132
0 %
Asian/Pacific Islander
12
1 %
53
0 %
Other Race
9
0 %
117
0 %
Hispanic Origin (any race)
18
1 %
196
1 %
Total
1,807
100%
28,855
100%
Source: U.S. Census.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions 1-8 1

Based on the 1990 population distribution (see Table 2) and the 1996 Office of State
Planning's population estimate for the entire Town of Burgaw, the following table has
been compiled. This data has been provided only to provide a general indication of the
town's 1996 population distribution. Graphs 1 and 2 provide an illustration of the age and
race data provided in Table 4.
Table 4
Town of Burgaw
1996 Population by Age, Race, and Sex Estimates
Total Persons White** Black**
% of
Total Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female
04
183 5.2 87 96 93 39 54 82 45 37
5-17
591 16.8 312 279 349 175 174 243 141 102
18-24
218 6.2 134 84 111 66 45 107 68 39
25-34
472 13.4 275 197 269 140 129 189 123 66
35-39
264 7.5 127 137 179 88 91 72 31 41
40-44
208 5.9 110 98 144 84 60 62 25 37
45-64
676 19.2 311 365 419 193 226 249 ill 138
65 +
907 25.8 249 658 668 189 479 242 61 181
Total
3,519* 1,605 1,914 2,232 974 1,258 1,246 605 641
Sources:
*Office of State Planning.
**1990 U.S. Census; extrapolation, based on 1990 Census, conducted by Holland Consulting
Planners, Inc.
In terms of non -college level educational attainment, the town's population lags behind
that of the state as a whole. In 1990, approximately 29% of North Carolina's total
population greater than 18 years of age had not attained a high school diploma compared
to 37 % in Burgaw. However, the percentage of individuals who attained a college degree
in Burgaw was very similar to that of the state (Burgaw 22.8 %, North Carolina 22.2 %).
It should be noted that it is not unusual for a small town in eastern North Carolina to have
a lower percentage of high school degrees per capita than the state as a whole. It is highly
likely that a number of the town's individuals who did not attain a high school degree fall
within the 65 and up age group. These individuals would have been school aged during
a period of time when a high percentage of youngsters left school at an early age to go to
work. Table 5 provides a summary of educational attainment for the Town of Burgaw.
11
ISection I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-9 '
I

Graph 1
Age Composition, Burgaw and Pender County
27%
19%
23%
BURGAW
5%
6% 7%
PENDER COUNTY
14% 7%
8%
17%
13%
6%
8%
❑ Under 5 years
El 5 to 17 years
18 to 24 years
25 to 34 years
® 35 to 39 years
El 40 to 44 years
45 to 64 years
■ 65 and over
❑ Under 5 years
❑ 5 to 17 years
EM 18 to 24 years
El 25 to 34 years
® 35 to 39 years
40 to 44 years
45 to 64 years
■ 65 and over
Source: Based on 1990 U. S. Census data.

Graph 2
Racial Composition, Burgaw and Pender County
64
BURGAW
5%
1%
PENDER COUNTY
1%
White
Black
■ Other
White
Black
■ Other
Source: Based on 1990 U. S. Census data.
I- I 1

Less than 9th grade
9th to 12th grade, no diploma
High school grad.
Some college, no degree
Assoc. degree
Bach. degree
Grad. or Prof. degree
TOTAL
Source: 1990 U.S. Census.
Table 5
Town of Burgaw
1990 Educational Attainment by Race and Hispanic Origin
Persons 18+
Persons 25+
% of
% of
% of
% of
Am.Ind
Asian/
Other
Hisp
Total
Total
Total
Total
White
Total
Black
Total
Esk Al
Pac Isl
Race
Or.
287
20.4
287
22.2
160
18.6
117
28.0
0
2
8
8
243
17.3
205
15.8
114
13.2
91
21.8
0
0
0
2
328
23.3
283
21.8
181
21.0
102
24.4
0
0
0
2
228
16.2
217
16.7
164
19.0
53
12.7
0
0
0
0
79
5.5
70
5.4
46
5.3
24
5.7
0
0
0
0
162
11.5
153
11.8
129
15.0
20
4.8
0
4
0
0
81
5.8
81
6.3
68
7.9
11
2.6
0
2
0
0
1,408
1,296
862
418
0
8
8
12
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-12 1

2. Housing Characteristics I
Between the years 1980-1990, the total number of year-round housing units in Burgaw increased
by 56. This amounts to an annual increase of approximately 6 dwelling units per year during the
ten-year period. Also of significance is the fact that the growth of vacant units exceeded that of
occupied units by almost 60%. The majority of the increase in vacant housing units was attributed
to the conversion of year round units to rental units as opposed to the construction of new rental
units. Table 6 provides a summary of Burgaw's housing by tenure and vacancy for years 1980,
1990, and 1997.
Table 6
Town of Burgaw
Housing Tenure and Vacancy, 1980, 1990, and 1997
Numeric
% Change
1980
1990
1997
Change `90-`97
`90-`97
TOTAL UNITS
646
702
898
+ 196
+27.9 %
Total Year Round Units
646
702
898
+ 196
+27.9 %
Occupied
599
625
800
+ 175
+28.0 %
Renter Occupied
153
170
218
+48
+28.2 %
Owner Occupied
446
455
582
+ 127
+27.9 %
Vacant Units
47*
77
98
+21
+27.3 %
For Sale
8
13
17
+4
+30.8%
For Rent
Other**
5
25
22
42
28
53
+6
+11
+27.3 %
+26.2%
* In 1980, nine units were held for occasional use.
** Other: This category is for any living quarters occupied as a housing unit that does not fit the previous
categories. Examples that fit this category are houseboats, railroad cars, campers, and vans.
Source: 1990 U.S. Census.
Based on the town building permit records, there were 96 permits issued for the construction of
new frame -built single-family housing units between 1990-1997 and 67 permits issued for mobile
home placement. Based on the rates of building permit issuance experienced during this period,
there should be approximately 670 single-family and 100 mobile homes currently in the Town of
Burgaw.
The Town of Burgaw has a relatively old housing inventory compared to Pender County and the
state as a whole. In 1990, the median year of construction for the Burgaw housing inventory was
1965. For the state and Pender County, the median years of construction were 1971 and 1975,
respectively. The 1990 Census indicated that over 42 % of the town's housing stock was over
thirty years old and 13 % was constructed prior to 1940. A summary of Burgaw's housing
inventory age is provided in the following table.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-13 1 1

Table 7
Town of Burgaw
Year Structure Built by Tenure, 1997
Occupied Units
Total Vacant
Year Built Units % Units Total Owner Renter
1991 to 1997 163 17.9 % 22 141 120 21
1989 to 1990 60 6.6 % 8 52 44 8
1985 to 1988 71 7.8 % 16 55 16 39
1980 to 1984 83 9.1 % 8 75 46 29
1970 to 1979 118 13.0 % 10 108 94 14
1960 to 1969 126 13.8 % 14 112 81 31
1950 to 1959 129 14.2 % 12 117 113 4
1940 to 1949 68 7.5 % 6 62 37 25
Before 1940 92 10.1 % 9 83 57 26
TOTAL* 910 100.0 % 105 805 608 197
*The reader is cautioned that this total does not equal the total found in Table 6 because it does
not take into account demolitions that have occurred as a result of FY85 and FY89 CDBG
programs, a FY92 HOME rehabilitation program, and the town's minimum housing code
enforcement program.
Source: 1990 U.S. Census and Town of Burgaw building permit data.
Single-family housing units comprised almost 82% of Burgaw's entire housing stock in 1990. In
addition, approximately 13 % of the town's housing stock were multi -family units and
approximately 5 % were mobile homes. Table 8 provides a summary of the town's dwelling units
by structure type and tenure.
Table 8
Town of Burgaw
Units' in Structure by Tenure, 1990
Occupied Units
Units in Structure Total Units* °o Vacant Units Total Owner Renter
1, detached 568 80.9 % 54 514 417 97
1, attached 6 0.9% 3 3 3 0
2 20 2.8 % 6 14 3 11
3 or 4 34 4.8 % 6 20 0 28
5 to 9 33 4.7 % 3 30 0 30
10 to 19 3 0.4 % 0 3 0 3
20 to 49 0 0.0 % 0 0 0 0
ISection I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-14 1

Table 8 (continued) I
Occupied Units
Units in Structure Total Units* % Vacant Units Total Owner Renter
50 or more 0 0.0 % 0 0 0 0
Mobile home or trailer 33 4.7% 5 28 27 1
Other 5 0.7 % 0 5 5 0
TOTAL 702 100.0 % 77 625 455 170
*While the 1990 Census shows only 90 multi -family units, in 1992, there were actually 175 multi -family
dwelling units in Burgaw. These included the Northwood (50 units), Durham Village (35 units), Westside
(49 units), and public housing complexes.
Source: 1990 U.S. Census.
The 1990 value of Burgaw's housing stock was below that of the state and Pender County. The
median value of Burgaw's total housing stock was $55,200. The median values for the state and
Pender County were $65,300 and $59,200, respectively. However, there would not be such a
large difference between the value of the town's and county's housing stocks if the county's
seasonal housing units were discounted. There were, and continue to be, a large number of high
value seasonal housing units along Pender County's coastline which skew the median value of the
county's housing stock. It should be pointed out that approximately 48 % of the town's housing
units were valued between $50,000-$100,000 while 28 % were valued at less than $35,000. Table
9 provides a summary of Burgaw's 1990 housing values.
Table 9
Town of Burgaw
Housing Values, 1990
Units %
Less than $ 15,000 17 4.3 %
$15,000 - 19,999 19 4.8%
$20,000 - 24,999 15 3.8%
$25,000 - 29,999 20 5.0%
$30,000 - 34,999 22 5.5 %
$35,000 - 39,999 17 4.3 %
$40,000 - 44,999 33 8.3 %
$45,000 - 49,999 30 7.5 %
$50,000 - 59,999 50 12.6%
$60,000 - 74,999 78 19.6%
$75,000 - 99,999 62 15.6%
$100,000 - 124,999 14 3.5%
$125,000 - 149,999 12 3.0%
$150,000 - 174,999 6 1.5%
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-15 1 1

ITable 9 (continued)
Units
%
$175,000 - 199,999 3
0.8%
$200,000 - 249,999 0
$250,000 - 299,999 0
0.0%
0.0%
$300,000 - 399,999 0
0.0%
$400,000 - 499,999 0
0.0%
$500,000 or more 0
0.0%
Total 398
100.0 %
Mean Value:
Mortgaged $62,366
No mortgage $56,311
All units $59,141
Median value $55,200
It should be pointed out that housing values in Burgaw have increased
significantly since 1990. According
to the town's building inspector, the average cost of a new home constructed today in Burgaw falls within
the $100,0004130,000 range.
Source: 1990 U.S. Census.
Table 10 provides a summary of the town's housing conditions
based on 1990 U.S. Census
findings.
Table 10
Town of Burgaw
Housing Conditions, 1990
Condition
Number of Units
Source of Water
Public system or private company
659*
Individual well:
Drilled
27
Dug
12
Some other source
4
Sewage Disposal
Public sewer
637*
Septic tank or cesspool
58
Other means
7
Kitchen Facilities
Complete kitchen facilities
697
Lacking complete kitchen facilities
5
'
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions
I-16
�1

F�
Table 10 (continued) I
Condition Number of Units
Plumbing Facilities
Complete plumbing facilities 696
Lacking complete plumbing facilities 6
*According to the town's records, in April 1998, the town's water system served 911 households
and the town's sewer system served 875 households.
Source: 1990 U.S. Census.
Table 10 indicates that out of the town's 702 total housing units present in 1990, only 5 lacked
complete kitchen facilities and only 6 lacked complete plumbing facilities. However, the 1993
Burgaw Land Use Plan indicated that the 1990 U.S. Census did not portray the poor housing
conditions that were present.
Despite participation in FY85 and FY89 CDBG and FY92 HOME rehab programs, during which
a total of 57 structures were renovated or demolished, there are still approximately 90 deteriorated
or dilapidated dwelling units in Burgaw, based on town -wide housing needs assessments performed
in 1994 and 1996 by the planning staff of Holland Consulting Planners, Inc. This is
approximately 10.0% of the town's estimated total housing stock of 898 units. Although these
substandard units are scattered throughout the town, the greatest concentrations are located in the
southwest quadrant of town and along the A.C.L. railroad tracks in the north central part of town
(see Map 2). The major housing needs are structural improvements, weatherization, heating
system improvements, lot clearance, and fire hazard removal.
Surveys of residents in CDBG and HOME areas, past and present, have demonstrated that well
over 80% of households who occupy substandard housing are low and moderate income. These
conditions have made it difficult or impossible for owners to finance weatherization or cosmetic
improvements, let alone major plumbing, electrical, or heating system improvements. Major
repairs have not been made, in many cases, since the unit was constructed or located on the
property.
The town has condemned its last few units with pit privies during active code enforcement efforts
during the past three years, and has also upgraded several units with straight piping problems
during its FY89 and FY92 rehab programs and through code enforcement. However, during
surveys conducted in 1996, two units with no sewage disposal systems were identified, and several
units with substandard/failing septic tanks were identified. Finally, several units with moderate
water needs and one unit with no running water were identified.
The Town of Burgaw has been awarded FY98 CDBG funds to address these remaining
deficiencies. The project will include the rehabilitation of eleven (11) occupied dwelling units,
the clearance of two dilapidated structures, and the relocation of one tenant and one homeowner
household to standard housing. The clearance and relocation activities will eliminate a black water
discharge at one occupied unit and eliminate severe sewer needs for one household without an
existing sewage disposal system. Additionally, several other severe and moderate on -site water
and sewer needs will be addressed through installation of new septic tanks and water wells or
provision of municipal utility service.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-17 1 1

ao•
EAs
N, �D
CT
�RI z
\i Yo ss CT o _
M 3
o W z F
. � W
M
N 6tCK
Mc NEiL ST.
us BENN _
Tx ST•
� Cp,MPBEV' r N
n .PCY LN. N N S'L • m
co
o
o sT.
U N O N (�
CoWAN
N
ST'
x
N Wa1G�T
K� N
a s
m
3 SMiSN
� W
o C
trr _
U
2
The preparation of this map was financed in part leiW through a grant provided by the North Carolina -C O
ACoastal Management Program, through funds provided
= by the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as
amended, which is administered by the Office of OV
Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National L
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. a� U)
Q�
GENERALIZED LOCATION OF
SUBSTANDARD HOUSING UNITS
MAP 2
HOUSINGnO= CONCENTRATIONS OF SUBSTANDARD

3. Summary
The following provides a summary of significant demographic and housing factors:
-- Between 1990-1996, the Town of Burgaw was the fastest growing municipality in the
county.
-- The completion of I-40 has served as a major stimulus for population growth.
-- Between 1980 and 1990, the portion of Burgaw's population within the primary child-
bearing age group increased from 18 % to 20 %.
-- Burgaw's non -white population has declined steadily since 1960.
-- Burgaw's secondary school educational attainment is lagging behind that of the state.
-- Between 1990 and 1997, Burgaw's total housing inventory increased approximately 28%.
i-- In 1990, 42 % of the town's dwelling units were over thirty years old.
-- Over 27 % of Burgaw's total housing stock had a value of $35,000 or less in 1990.
However, the average cost of a new home today in Burgaw is in the $100,000-$130,000
range.
-- In 1996, there were approximately 90 dilapidated or deteriorated dwelling units located
within Burgaw. This was 10 % of the town's total housing stock.
C. ECONOMY
1 1. Reizional Econom
Over the past ten years, the state of Pender County's economy may be described as below average
when compared to the economies of all of the state's counties. According to the Economic
Development Yearbook for North Carolina, produced by Problem -Solving Research, Inc., Pender
County received a rank of 69th out of 100 North Carolina counties in terms of economic growth
and development between the years 1984-1994. The following provides a summary, as stated in
the Economic Development Yearbook, of the methodology used to arrive at the composite
rankings found in Table 11.
"The Composite Rankings were created to compare the characteristics of growth between the 100 counties
in North Carolina. Three rankings are provided. The one year ranking provides a short term picture of
growth. It consists of an overview of the present health of the county coupled with the county's 1993-1994
economic performance. The five year ranking provides a mid-term view of economic development. Like
the one year ranking, it assesses the present health of the county but couples the assessment with the county's
1989-1994 economic variation. The ten year index provides a long-term view of growth. This final measure
assesses the present health of the county with the county's 1984-1994 growth and development.
ISection I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-19 1

The Composite Ranking of Economic Development is a broadly defined measure of relative economic well-
being. Its construction has two major parts. First, it is composed of four measures that describe the
economic health of an area at a particular point in time. Each of these components provides a unique gauge
of the county's most recent annual economic health. Second, the ranking is composed of five measures of
economic change. Thus, the Composite Ranking considers the present well-being of the county and how the
local economy has improved from one point to the next.
The nine components of the Composite Ranking are arranged according to five general areas:
ABILITY TO CREATE JOBS
• Change in Employment measures the area's ability to create jobs.
ABILITY TO EARN AN ADEQUATE INCOME
• Per Capita Income measures the level of income from the wages & salaries and other
forms of income generating activity (such as investments and owner profit).
• Change in Per Capita Income demonstrates the increase in income between two points
in time. Although this measure is correlated with the growth in jobs, a pace of change in
per capita income that lags the pace of job growth implies that the area is adding lower
paying jobs.
ABILITY TO KEEP THE LOCAL LABOR FORCE EMPLOYED
• Unemployment Rate measures the percentage of the population that is willing to work
but is unable to obtain employment.
• Change in Unemployment Rate measures the improvement in an individual's ability
to find work from one period to the next.
ABILITY TO ATTRACT INCOME FROM OTHER REGIONS
• Per Capita Retail Sales measures the ability of an area to attract persons to a county to
shop and play, thereby demonstrating the regional importance of a local area.
• Change in Per Capita Retail Sales measures how the relative attractiveness of an area
for shopping and play has changed over time.
ABILITY TO REDUCE POVERTY
• Per Capita Food Stamp Recipients serves as a proxy for a poverty index. It shows the
relative number of persons that are unable to adequately support themselves or their
families.
• Change in Per Capita Food Stamp Recipients shows how the level of poverty has
changed over time.
The Composite Rankings are created by assigning equal weights to the nine components of development.
First, the measure's nine components are computed for each county in North Carolina. Second, within each
component the counties are ranked from most positive to most negative and assigned a ranking from 1 to 100.
The average of the nine rankings is tabulated and ranked from top to bottom. The Composite Ranking is this
final result. "
The composite rankings for the twenty CAMA counties, as found in the Economic Development
Yearbook, have been included in Table 11.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-20 1

fl
1
1
I
Table 11
CAMA Counties
One, Five, and Ten -Year Composite Rankings of Economic Development
Beaufort
Bertie
Brunswick
Camden
Carteret
Chowan
Craven
Currituck
Dare
Gates
Hertford
Hyde
New Hanover
Onslow
Pamlico
Pasquotank
Pender
Perqimans
Tyrrell
Washington
One -Year
1993-1994
State
CAMA
Rank
Rank
90
16
100
20
76
13
82
15
56
7
70
11
62
8
19
2
39
4
95
19
52
6
26
3
17
1
67
9
92
18
71
12
91
17
49
5
68
10
77
14
Five -Year
1989-1994
State
CAMA
Rank
Rank
89
15
96
20
68
8
71
10
35
2
82
14
57
6
43
4
42
3
58
7
91
18
76
11
30
1
69
9
77
12
90
17
92
19
78
13
49
5
88
16
Ten -Year
1984-1994
State
CAMA
Rank
Rank
94
17
100
20
75
9
83
13
58
5
89
15
76
10
47
4
10
1
79
11
99
19
44
3
30
2
91
16
62
6
98
18
69
7
80
12
70
8
85
14
Note: State rank out of 100 total counties and CAMA rank out of 20 total counties.
Source: Economic Development Yearbook for North Carolina, 1995.
Out of the three periods included in Table 11, Pender County received its highest rankings for the
ten-year period 1984-1994. During the period 1993-1994, the county's state ranking was 91st
while its ranking amongst the 20 CAMA counties was 17th.
ISection I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-21 1

2. Local Economy
An area's median income often provides a good indicator of its economy. Using median income
as an indicator, the Town of Burgaw appears to have a slightly stronger and more stable economy
when compared to the county as a whole. Although below that of North Carolina, Burgaw's
median income is above that of Pender County. See Table 12.
Table 12
Town of Burgaw
Median Income, 1989
Town of Burgaw
$31,853
Pender County
$29,447
North Carolina
$33,242
Source: 1990 U.S. Census.
Table 13 provides a detailed summary of 1989 household income in Burgaw.
Table 13
Town of Burgaw
Household, Family, and Nonfamily Income, 1989
Nonfamily
Households
Families
Households
$0 - 4,999
52
16
36
$5,000 - 9,999
83
40
43
$10,000 - 12,499
45
26
19
$12,500 - 14,999
24
21
3
$15,000 - 17,499
44
27
17
$17,500 - 19,999
63
45
18
$20,000 - 22,499
37
33
4
$22,500 - 24,999
25
16
9
$25,000 - 27,499
15
13
2
$27,500 - 29,999
15
10
5
$30,000 - 32,499
49
36
13
$32,500 - 34,999
10
8
2
$35,000 - 37,499
4
4
0
$37,500 - 39,999
13
13
0
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-22 1 1

1
17
1
Table 13 (continued)
$40,000 - 42,499
$42,500 - 44,999
$45,000 - 47,499
$47,500 - 49,999
$50,000 - 54,599
$55,000 - 59,999
$60,000 - 74,999
$75,000 - 99,999
$100,0 00 - 124,999
$125,000 - 149,999
$150,000 or more
Total
Nonfamily
Households
Families
Households
12
10
2
18
16
2
12
12
0
12
9
3
11
11
0
16
16
0
22
20
2
15
13
2
15
15
0
3
3
0
6
4
2
621
437
184
Source: 1990 U.S. Census.
A total of 309 households, or just under 50 % of Burgaw's households, had annual incomes of less
than $20,000 in 1989.
Approximately 14 % of Burgaw's population lived in poverty in 1989 compared to 17 % for Pender
County and 13 % for the state as a whole. Given the town's median income, the town's poverty
status in relation to the county and state is as expected. It should be noted that the percentage of
individuals below the poverty level in Burgaw is higher for African Americans and Hispanics than
for Whites. Table 14 indicates the town's poverty status by race.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-23 1

Table 14
Town of Burgaw
Poverty Status in 1989 by Race and Hispanic Origin by Age
White
Black
Amer Ind, Esk, Al
Above
Below
Above
Below
Above
Below
Age
Poverty
Poverty
% Below
Poverty
Poverty
% Below
Poverty
Poverty
% Below
0-4
43
5
10.4%
33
6
15.4%
0
0
0.0%
5
13
3
18.8%
5
9
64.3%
0
0
0.0%
6 - 11
74
3
3.9%
28
22
44.0%
0
0
0.0%
12 - 17
86
0
0.0%
28
33
54.1%
0
0
0.0%
18 - 64
487
21
4.1%
204
74
26.6%
0
0
0.0%
65 - 74
109
8
6.8 %
30
29
48.3 %
0
0
0.0%
75 +
87
17
16.3 %
19
10
34.5 %
0
0
0.0%
Total
899
57
6.0%
347
182
34.4%
0
0
0.0%
Asian/Pac Isl
Other Race
Hispanic Origin
0-4
2
0
0.0%
1
0
0.0%
0
0
0.0%
5
0
0
0.0%
0
0
0.0%
0
0
0.0%
6- 11
2
0
0.0%
0
0
0.0%
0
2
100.0%
12 - 17
0
0
0.0%
0
0
0.0%
4
0
0.0%
18 - 64
8
0
0.0%
2
0
0.0%
6
6
50.0%
65 - 74
0
0
0.0%
0
0
0.0%
0
0
0.0%
75 +
0
0
0.0%
0
0
0.0%
0
0
0.0%
Total
12
0
0.0%
3
0
0.0%
10
8
44.4%
Source: 1990 U.S. Census.
As was the case with the town's median income and poverty level, unemployment in Burgaw is
lower than that experienced by the county as a whole but higher than that of the state. In 1989,
a total of 48 persons in Burgaw greater than 16 years of age were unemployed. This represented
7.3 % of the town's labor force compared to 8 % for the county and 5 % for the state. Although
there are no more recent unemployment figures for Burgaw, unemployment in 1996 can be
estimated at approximately 4.9 % given the fact that the county's and state's rates were 5.4 % and
4.3 %, respectively. It should be noted that a portion of the town's unemployment may be
attributed to the high percentage of the town's population age 65 and over (25.8 %, see Table 2).
Table 15 provides the 1990 Burgaw employment by industry.
Table 15
Town of Burgaw
Employed Persons (16 Years Old and Over) by Industry
Industry # %
Agriculture, forestry, & fisheries 23 3.8
Mining 0 0.0
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-24 1

r�
fl
Table 15 (continued)
Industry # %
Construction
34
5.6
Manufacturing:
Nondurable goods
56
9.2
Durable goods
29
4.8
Transportation
11
1.8
Communications & other public utilities
17
2.8
Wholesale trade
24
4.0
Retail trade
101
16.7
Finance, insurance, & real estate
16
2.6
Services:
Business & repair services
8
1.3
Personal services
33
5.5
Entertainment & recreation
3
0.5
Professional & related services:
97
16.0
Health services
58
9.6
Educational services
51
8.4
Other professional & related services
Public Administration
45
7.4
Total
606
100.0
Source: 1990 U.S. Census.
The retail trade and health services industries provide the greatest percentage of jobs in Burgaw,
comprising 16.7% and 16.0%, respectively, of the town's total employment. In addition, all of
the service industries combined occupied 41.3 % of Burgaw's employment while the manufacturing
of durable and nondurable goods occupied 14.0%. Generally, the distribution of employment in
Burgaw appeared to be fairly balanced in 1989. There were strong levels of employment in the
public administration, educational services, other professional services, and the manufacture of
nondurable goods. In addition, the fact that in 1990 over 21 % of the town's workers were
employed in government jobs also serves as a stabilizing factor for the economy.
Although the Town of Burgaw is not a significant tourist destination, the town does experience
' an economic impact from vacationers traveling through Burgaw to get to nearby beach
communities. These transient travelers help provide for the success of the town's retail trade
industry.
It is conceivable that tourism may begin playing an even more important role in the town's
economy during the planning period. Pender County and the Pender United Tourism Committee
are currently working with the North Carolina Division of Travel and Tourism to promote heritage
tourism in the county. The Pender United Tourism Committee has applied for $25,000 in disaster
relief funds to conduct a county -wide inventory of potential heritage sites. Once heritage sites
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-25 1

have been identified, links can be made between the sites, a tour established, and marketing
strategies developed. In the event that heritage sites are identified in and around Burgaw during
the inventory, it is likely that they would be included as part of a county -wide heritage tour. This
could result in increased tourist activity within Burgaw.
The Town of Burgaw views tourism as a significant contributor to the local economy and supports
continued development of the tourism industry.
In 1990, almost one-half (42 %) of the town's employed labor force worked within Burgaw. This
is evidenced by the rather low mean travel time to work of 18.5 minutes. However,
approximately 11 % of the workforce did travel more than 45 minutes to their place of work.
Table 16 provides a summary of Burgaw's employed persons travel time to work.
Table 16
Town of Burgaw and Pender County
Travel Time to Work, Workers 16 Years and Over
Town of Burgaw % of Total
Did not work at home:
Less then 5 minutes
65
11.0 %
5 to 9 minutes
164
27.8 %
10 to 14 minutes
70
11.9 %
15 to 19 minutes
43
7.3 %
20 to 24 minutes
45
7.6 %
25 to 29 minutes
16
2.7 %
30 to 34 minutes
81
13.8 %
35 to 39 minutes
20
3.4 %
40 to 44 minutes
18
3.1 %
45 to 59 minutes
52
8.8 %
60 to 89 minutes
10
1.7 %
90 or more minutes
5
0.8 %
TOTAL
589
100.0 %
Worked at home
11
Source: 1990 U.S. Census.
The industries that have located in Burgaw and its extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) area help
provide the necessary jobs to ensure a stable economy. The majority of the industries in the
Burgaw area are located in the Burgaw Industrial Park, in south central Burgaw, and in Stag Park,
adjacent to I40. Industrial land uses and associated issues will be discussed in detail in the
Existing Land Use section of this plan.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-26 1

1
I
fl
The following list provides a summary of industries located in Burgaw and its ETJ:
Number of
Industry
Employees
Product
Location
Action Mold and Die, Inc. (1)(3)
6
Injection Molding
Burgaw
Burgaw Milling Company
8
Hardware, Gardening
Burgaw
Carlisle Poultry and Egg Assn., Inc.
34
Shell Eggs
Burgaw
Chloride Systems (2)(3)
150
Emergency Lighting and
ETJ
Batteries
Gauge Carolina Metal (3)(1)
50
Sheet Metal Fabrication
Burgaw
Leslie -Locke, Inc. (2)
150
Ventilation products &
ETJ
duct work
Lewis Sausage Company, Inc.
25
Smoked Sausage
ETJ
Murphy Brothers Milling Co.
5
Feed
Burgaw
Nunalee Lumber Co., Inc.
10
Wooden moldings
ETJ
Pres-tige Label Corporation (1)(3)
30
Printed Labels
Burgaw
Southern Printing Co.
3
Letterpress and offset
Burgaw
printing; typesetting;
glue, staple, side wire,
saddle stitch, plastic &
spiral wire binding
Ultrafoam, Inc. (1)(3)
70
Molded Foam
Burgaw
W.R. Rayson, Inc. (1)(3)
50
Health and Beauty Paper
Burgaw
Products
Wieland North American Electronics (2)(3)
75
Electronics
ETJ
(1) Located in Burgaw Industrial Park.
(2) Located in Stag Industrial Park.
(3) Established since 1980.
Source: North Carolina Manufacturers Directory.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-27 1

Burgaw's local economy is also aided by a financially sound local government. Table 17 provides
a comparison of the town's revenues versus expenditures for Fiscal Year 1997. As indicated, the
town's revenues exceeded expenditures by over $100,000.
Table 17
Town of Burgaw
Government Revenue Data, For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1997
Revenue by Source
Ad Valorem Taxes
$ 531,138
Other Taxes and Licenses
429,096
Unrestricted Intergovernmental
173,165
Restricted Intergovernmental
402,646
Permits and Fees
51,244
Sales and Services
266,758
Investment Earnings
21,181
Miscellaneous
81,813
Total Revenues
$1,957,041
Expenditure by Tyne
Current:
General Government
$ 285,286
Public Safety
459,314
Transportation
190,404
Environmental Protection
807,805
Central Services
36,166
Cultural and Recreation
26,320
Economic and Physical Development
21,648
Debt Service:
Principal Retirement
21,429
Interest and Fees
1,224
Contingency
0
Total Expenditures
$1,849,596
Source: Town of Burgaw.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-28 1 1

IThe following provides a summary of significant economic data for Burgaw:
-- Burgaw has a relatively stable economy with employment balanced among a wide range
of employment categories.
-- Approximately 14 % of Burgaw's residents lived in poverty in 1989 compared to 17 % for
Pender County and 13 % for the state as a whole..
-- Burgaw's unemployment rate has generally been higher than that of the state.
-- Burgaw's employed residents primarily work in local jobs.
' -- Industrial development has been strong during the 1980s and early 1990s with 306
industrial jobs created.
-- During the 1980s, Burgaw's percentage of persons living below the poverty level
decreased significantly from 22.1 % of the total population in 1979 to 11.77 % of the total
' population in 1989. The strong industrial growth has had a positive impact on reducing
the level of poverty.
' -- The town's economy is aided by a sound local government.
D. EXISTING LAND USE
1. General Land Use Patterns
Land use patterns in Burgaw have not changed significantly since the town's land use plan was last
updated in 1993. Residential development has continued at a moderate but steady pace. Most of
the town's new residential construction has been scattered throughout the town's corporate area.
The only significant concentration of residential construction has been along McNeil Street south
of Wilmington Street. Very little commercial development has occurred in Burgaw's planning
jurisdiction during the past five years. The few new commercial businesses that were constructed
are located primarily in the town's Central Business District and along the N.C. 53 highway
corridor. The lack of adequate retail services in town has been identified as a deficiency and will
be discussed in more detail in a later section of this plan. Industrial development has occurred on
International Drive and McKoy Road, both of which are located in the Stag Park Industrial area.
Significant government and institutional development has occurred including city and county
government facilities and medical facilities expansion.
The Town of Burgaw's planning jurisdiction includes approximately 8,355 acres of which 25
or 2,093 acres, are located within the town's corporate area. Within the Town of Burgaw's
planning jurisdiction, the predominant land use is vacant/agricultural. However, it should be
noted that of the 1,237 acres of vacant/agricultural land, approximately 10%, or 124 acres, is
occupied by street and rail right-of-way. The predominant developed land use within the town is
' residential, of which approximately 362 acres is in single-family residential land use. Recreational
ISection I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-29 1

land uses comprise the second largest portion of developed acreage (168 acres), followed by
government/institutional land uses (117 acres).
In the extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ), the primary land use is also vacant/agricultural. The ETJ
area contains approximately 6,262 acres of which over 8 % is developed. The predominant
developed land use is single-family residential (385 acres), followed by industrial land uses (68
acres). Table 18 provides a summary of land uses within the town and its ETJ. Map 3 illustrates
land uses within Burgaw's planning jurisdiction.
Table 18
Town of Burgaw Planning Jurisdiction
Estimated Land Use Acreage, April, 1998
Total
Corporate % % Planning %
Area of ETJ of Jurisdiction of
Use (acres) Total (acres) Total (acres) Total
Single -Family Residential
Multi -Family Residential
Single -Wide Mobile Home
Double -Wide Mobile
Home
Mobile Home Park
Office
Government/Institutional
Commercial
Mixed Use Downtown
Industrial
Recreational
Vacant/Agricultural*
TOTAL
362
17.3 %
385
6.1 %
747
9.0 %
21
1.0%
0
0.0%
21
0.3%
27
1.3%
34
0.5%
61
0.7%
1
0.1%
6
0.1%
7
0.1%
9
0.4%
0
0.0%
9
0.1%
25
1.2 %
1
0.1%
26
0.3 %
117
5.6%
4
0.1%
121
1.5%
73
3.5%
14
0.2%
87
1.0%
1
0.1%
N/A
N/A
1
<0.1 %
52
2.5%
68
1.1 %
120
1.4%
168
8.0%
0
0.0%
168
2.0%
1,237
59.0%
5,750
91.8%
6,987
83.6%
2,093
100.0%
6,262
100.0%
8,355
100.0%
*The vacant/agricultural land use category includes street and rail right-of-way which is estimated to occupy
approximately 10% of the corporate area and 2% of the ETJ.
Source: Holland Consulting Planners, Inc.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-30 1

Ll
1
2. Residential
Residential land uses in the Town of Burgaw, which include single-family residential, multi -family
residential, single -wide mobile home, double -wide mobile home, and mobile home park land uses,
occupy approximately 20 %, or 420 acres, of the total land area in town. The largest concentration
of single-family residential development lies in the eastern portion of the town in the area generally
located between U.S. 117 and the U.S. 117 Bypass.
' As discussed in the housing section of this plan, between 1990 and 1997, there were 96 building
permits issued by the Town of Burgaw for conventional single-family construction and 67 permits
for mobile home placement, resulting in annual permit issuance rates of 14 and 10, respectively.
The majority of this new single-family residential construction is scattered throughout town with
the exception of a concentration of development located off Robinwood Street. Generally, mobile
home placement has occurred west of Dudley Street, with very few mobile homes located east of
Dudley Street.
Enforcement of the town's zoning ordinance has maintained densities since its inception in 1997.
' The average residential density within the town's corporate area has remained between 1.8-2.0
units per acre. As expected, within the town's ETJ, the average residential density is much lower,
with the majority of the lots 20,000 square feet or larger. No large subdivision development has
' occurred within the ETJ since the town's land use plan was updated in 1993. All housing
construction has occurred on individually subdivided lots.
It should be noted that the conversion of retail space downtown for residential use is a trend which
may be expected to emerge in Burgaw during the planning period. In many communities this type
of land use conversion has helped to regenerate interest in the downtown area and has provided
' a much needed stimulant for retail activity. Other than the possible emergence of this trend,
significant changes in residential land use patterns are not anticipated during the planning period.
Cl
1
Ll
i
3. Industrial
Industrial development within the Town of Burgaw comprises almost 3 % of the town's total land
area. However, out of the 856 acres which have been developed, industrial development
comprises over 6%. Industrial development within the town's ETJ occupies a slightly larger
amount of land area than the town, 68 acres versus 52 acres.
Almost all industrial development has occurred in either the 53-acre Burgaw Industrial Park or the
57-acre Stag Industrial Park which is adjacent to I-40 in the town's ETJ. In addition to the two
industrial parks, there are a few industrial uses scattered along the U.S. 17 Bypass and the old
Atlantic Coastline Railroad right-of-way.
Since the town's land use plan was last updated in 1993, several of the town's existing industries
have undergone expansion and a few new industries have located in the area as well. Ultra -Foam
has added a 21,000 square foot addition to its building on Industrial Drive, and Action Die and
Mold, located on Progress Drive, has added 6,000 square feet to their building. The Leslie -
Locke, Inc., 224,000 square foot facility, located in the Stag Industrial Park, opened in January
1994, and now employs approximately 150 persons. The Four County Electrical Membership
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-32 '
11

Corporation also opened a new building on N.C. 53, west of town, in August 1993, which houses
its administrative offices.
There appear to be no significant conflicts between existing industrial development and adjacent
land uses. However, there do appear to be some cases where existing industrial zoning conflicts
with existing land uses. For example, along the former rail corridor in town there are vacant
parcels zoned for industrial use in an area which is predominantly residential. In the event that
these parcels developed, land use conflicts could result. The town has expressed its concern over
existing zoning conflicts and has identified the need to update its zoning ordinance and revise its
zoning map. The issues of land compatibility and existing zoning patterns are discussed further
in the Land and Water Use Compatibility Analysis section of this plan.
The proximity of Burgaw to I-40 and the State Port in Wilmington as well as reasonable real estate
and job force availability will continue to attract industries to the Burgaw area. Industrial
employment has brought a considerable number of jobs to the area which have aided the local
economy.
4. Commercial
Commercial land uses with Burgaw and its ETJ occupy 73 and 14 acres, respectively.
Commercial development continues to concentrate within the town's Central Business District
(CBD) and along the U.S. 17 Bypass, particularly in the area near the N.C. 53 intersection. The
Pender Landing Shopping Center which developed in the late 1980s is located at this intersection.
Although a good deal of commercial activity occurs around Pender Landing, the major
concentration of commercial activity remains in the center of Burgaw around the Pender County
Courthouse square.
The concern over the potential for strip commercial development to spread along the N.C. 53
corridor between the U.S. 17 intersection and I-40 remains. The town should revise its zoning
ordinance to respond to this issue so that desirable and appropriate commercial development takes
place in this area. This issue is also discussed further in the Land and Water Use Compatibility
Analysis section of this plan.
The town provided the following list of problems relevant to its CBD in its 1993 Land Use Plan
Update. Since that time, the town has made progress in addressing all of these issues which
include the following:
-- deteriorating buildings
-- inadequate parking
-- low property values resulting in low tax revenue
-- vacant buildings
-- preservation of historically/architecturally significant structures
It should be noted that the inadequate parking issue listed above was not addressed through any
course of action but rather was found, through the completion of a parking study, not to be a
significant issue.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-33 1
F
r—,
�I+
Ll

5. Recreational
Other than the closure and sale of the Vann Street Playground, there have been no changes in
recreational land uses within Burgaw's planning jurisdiction during the past five years.
Recreational facilities in the town are limited and include only two parks. Harrell Memorial Park,
' located at Walker and Ashe Streets, contains playground equipment and a tennis court, and Pender
Memorial Park, located on South Smith Street, consists of five baseball fields, one of which is also
used as a Pop Warner football field. However, the major recreational facility in Burgaw is the
' Burgaw Country Club and Golf Course. The facility is a nine -hole course with room for
expansion to an eighteen -hole facility. The Country Club is a private facility with access not
available to the general public. The Town of Burgaw should pursue the preparation and adoption
' of a Parks and Recreation Plan which will guide future development of the town's parks and
recreation system.
6. Government/Institutional
Almost all of the government/institutional land uses are located in and adjacent to the CBD.
' Government/institutional development occupies approximately 117 acres within the town's
corporate area and 4 acres within its ETJ. Government/institutional land uses located outside of
the town's CBD include: the Pender Memorial Hospital, located on Fremont Street; the Howard
Holly Administrative Office Building, also located on Fremont Street; the Pender County
Administrative Office Complex, located on South Walker Street; Huntington Health Care, located
on Campbell Street; and the Four County Electric Membership Corporation (EMC), located on
' N.C. 53 west of the Burgaw primary corporate limit line. The Four County EMC complex is
actually located in the corporate limits as the result of a 1992 satellite annexation. All of the
government/institutional uses are well maintained and are considered assets to the town.
' No significant changes in the government/institutional land use category have occurred since the
preparation of the town's last land use plan update. Significant changes in the
' government/institutional category are not expected to occur during the planning period.
Anticipated minor changes in public land use are discussed in Section II of this plan.
7. Vacant/Agricultural
' Vacant/agricultural areas occupy approximately 59 % of the town's corporate area and almost 92 %
of the ETJ. However, in actuality, a portion of the acreage previously indicated in Table 18 as
vacant/agricultural has been developed with street and rail right-of-way. Taking street and rail
right-of-way into consideration, there are actually approximately 1,113 acres of vacant/agricultural
land within the town and 5,635 acres within the ETJ. It should be noted that not all of this
' acreage is suitable for development. It is estimated that approximately 60 % of Burgaw's ETJ is
occupied by hydric soils. Areas having hydric soils also have a high probability of containing 404
jurisdictional wetlands. The abundance of 404 wetland areas will serve as a deterrent to growth
within the ETJ. No significant 404 wetland areas are located within the town's corporate limits.
Hydric soils within the town's planning jurisdiction have been indicated in Table 25. Although
significant 404 wetlands are known to exist, there will still be a sufficient amount of vacant,
developable acreage within the town's ETJ to accommodate growth during the planning period.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-34 '

8. Annexation Activity
When Burgaw's land use plan was last updated in 1993, the town occupied approximately 1,802
acres. Since that time, three annexations have occurred which have increased the town's total
acreage to approximately 2,044 acres. This amounts to an increase of 13.4% for the town's
corporate area during the past five years. Table 19 provides a summary of annexation activity
from 1993-1997.
Table 19
Town of Burgaw
Annexation Activity Summary, 1993-1997
Annexation
Type of
Annexation
Acres
Date Effective Annexed
General Description
Highway 117
Involuntary
April 5, 1994 61.02
Area to the north of the intersection of
Bypass South Area
117 Business and 117 Bypass
Penderlea
Involuntary
April 5, 1994 136.25
Northwest of corporate limit line in area
Highway Area
of Penderlea Highway and Henry Brown
Road being bound to the west by lots
located within the West Pines
Subdivision
Wilmco
Voluntary
January 23, 1996 44.388
Area in between Basden Road and Cottle
Annexation
Acres Road running from east to west.
In between Henry Brown Road and
Penderlea Highway running south to
north
TOTAL ACRES
241.658
Source: Town of Burgaw.
9. Land Use Issue Identification
On November 18, 1997, the Town of Burgaw conducted a public meeting to solicit citizen input
for the identification of key land use related issues affecting the Town of Burgaw. Approximately
20 citizens attended the meeting. Issues were randomly identified by those attending. At the
conclusion of the meeting each individual was requested to identify, in order of significance, the
issues which they considered most important. A composite ranking of the individual ratings was
prepared utilizing a weighted rating system. The following provides a composite ranking of the
identified issues (one being most important and twenty-six being least important).
1. Stormwater drainage needs and issues. 101
2. By-pass for N.C. 53. 129
3. Industrial growth/development. 154
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-35 1 1

u
1
4.
Preservation of the Central Business District.
169
5.
Expansion of municipal water and sewer systems.
172
6.
Protect/Identify prime residential areas.
181
7.
Elimination of substandard housing.
186
8.
Evaluate thoroughfare plan suggestions
187
9.
Increase recreational facilities.
188
10.
Annexation.
189
11.
Commercial/Increase
191
12.
"Strip" commercialization along U.S. 117.
204
13.
Intergovernmental cooperation within the county.
207
14.
Community appearance
208
15.
Housing styles/Lot size.
209
16.
Expansion of wastewater treatment plant.
211
17.
Extraterritorial jurisdiction.
224
18.
Increase affordable housing.
225
19.
Protect surface water quality.
225
20.
Historic District preservation.
227
21.
Senior citizen quality of life.
231
22.
Preservation of 404 wetlands.
232
23.
Non town government decision making impact on
233
Burgaw.
24.
Increase parking.
236
25.
Solid waste disposal.
255
26.
Regional water and sewer system.
258
10. Existing Ordinances and Land Use Controls
The Town of Burgaw has maintained an active and effective planning program. Land use controls
have been adopted to guide development and implement the policies contained in the town's land
use plan. The town's Board of Commissioners, with the support and advice of the Planning
Board, is responsible for enforcement of land use related documents and ordinances. The town's
staff, including a town manager, town planner, and a building inspector, provide day-to-day advice
and technical assistance.
' The following provides a summary of the town's land use related codes, ordinances, and
documents.
I
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-36 '
1

Town of Burgaw Subdivision Regulations, 1977
In 1977 the Town of Burgaw adopted its initial subdivision ordinance. The purpose of the
ordinance is defined as follows:
"The purpose of this Ordinance is to support and guide the proper subdivision of land
'
within the jurisdiction of Burgaw in order to promote the public health, safety, and
general welfare of the citizens of Burgaw. The Ordinance is designed to promote the
orderly development of the Town and its extraterritorial jurisdiction; for the coordination
of streets and highways within proposed subdivisions with existing or planned streets and
highways and other public facilities; for the dedication or reservation of rights -of -way or
easements for street and utility purposes; and for the distribution of population and traffic,
which shall avoid congestion and overcrowding and which will create conditions essential
to public health, safety and the general welfare. This Ordinance is designed to further
facilitate adequate provision for water, sewerage, parks, schools, and playgrounds, and
also to facilitate the further resubdivision of larger tracts into smaller parcels of land. "
I
The town updated its subdivision ordinance in 1992. The update was intended to accomplish the
following objectives:
'
1. Adoption of a new Subdivision Ordinance consistent with current State Statutes
and the Burgaw Zoning Ordinance.
'
2. Review and streamline the town's requirements for preliminary and final plat
submittal where possible.
,
3. Improve definitions.
'
4. Improve requirements for cul-de-sacs.
5. Incorporate current planning and design standards.
'
Town of Burgaw Zoning Ordinance, 1989
'
The Town of Burgaw initially adopted a zoning ordinance in 1977. In 1989, Burgaw completely
revised the zoning ordinance. The ordinance applies to the town's corporate area and its
extraterritorial jurisdiction. Preparation of the zoning ordinance update was financed in part
through a grant provided by the North Carolina Coastal Management Program. The following
defines the intent of the ordinance:
1. Regulate and restrict the use of all structures and lands within the town limits of
Burgaw and the extraterritorial jurisdiction adopted April 2, 1974.
'
2. Regulate and restrict lot coverage, population density and distribution, and the
location and size of all structures within the town limits of Burgaw and the
extraterritorial jurisdiction.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-37 1 1

1
u
LI
u
1
3. Implement the town land use plan prepared in accordance with the Coastal Area
Management Act of 1974 and adopted by the town so as to:
Secure safety from fire, flooding, panic and other dangers;
Provide adequate light, air, sanitation, drainage;
Further the appropriate use of land, and conservation of natural resources;
Obtain the wise use, conservation, development, and protection of the
community's water, soil, woodland, and wildlife resources and attain a balance
between land uses and the ability of the natural resource base to support and
sustain such uses;
Prevent overcrowding, and avoid undue population concentration and urban
sprawl;
Stabilize and protect the natural beauty and property values;
Lessen congestion in and promote the safety and efficiency of the streets and
highways;
Facilitate the adequate provision of public facilities and utilities;
Preserve natural growth and cover and promote the natural beauty of the
community.
The ordinance divides the town's planning jurisdiction into eleven zoning jurisdictions which
include: residential -agricultural (RA-20), residential (R-12), multi -family residential (R-5),
residential mobile home (R-5MH), planned unit development (PUD), office and institutional (0-1),
central business district (B-1), neighborhood business district (B-2), light industrial (I-1), heavy
industrial (I-2) and floodplain (FP). Conditional use districts are available for all districts except
the floodplain district. In addition, the zoning ordinance regulates mobile home park development.
Since the town's zoning ordinance was completely revised in 1989, it has undergone numerous
amendments. The following provides a summary of these amendments:
-- an amendment regarding livestock, November 1993.
-- an amendment allowing self-service storage facilities to locate in certain zones, February
1993.
-- an amendment permitting the use of jails in the B-1 zoning district, September 1997.
-- an amendment stating that mobile homes must have skirting or a curtain wall constructed,
January 1998.
-- an amendment regarding the front footage restrictions for certain lots on cul-de-sacs,
March 1992.
-- an amendment deleting Section 9.17 which relates to portable signs. The regulation of
portable signs is now provided by the remainder of Section 9.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-38 '
1

-- an amendment to allow large animal medical services to operate in the RA-20 zone,
October 1992.
-- an amendment repealing the bona fide farm exemption, November 1993.
-- an amendment removing the single-family, two-family, and multi -family land uses as being
special uses within the B-1 district and adding the land use of accessory apartment as
being a special use within the B-1 district, March 1998.
-- an amendment allowing mobile vending in B-1 and B-2 districts, March 1998.
-- an amendment allowing flammable storage in Light Industrial (I-1) zones, October 1996.
-- an amendment adding a Standard Industrial Classification Code to each use listed in
Section 6.1.
-- an amendment regulating detached garages and accessory buildings, March 1998.
-- an amendment adding "Agricultural -Livestock" as a permitted use in the RA-20 zone,
November 1993.
-- an amendment prohibiting outdoor advertising signs in R-12, O&I, and B-1 districts,
March 1994.
-- an amendment in regard to section 14.2 penalties for violation.
-- an amendment implementing the statutory vested right provision of NCGS 160A-385.1
-- an amendment regulating telecommunication towers, April 1998.
Town of Burgaw Downtown Revitalization Plan, December, 1993
This plan was completed by graduate students from the N.C. State University School of Urban
Design. Generally, this plan makes recommendations for the beautification of Burgaw's Central
Business District.
Thoroughfare Plan for the Town of Burgaw, 1995
This plan was prepared by the Statewide Planning Branch, Division of Highways, N.C.
Department of Transportation in September, 1995. The thoroughfare plan discusses the need for
new facilities, plus identifies existing and future deficiencies in the transportation system. The
recommendations included in this plan are discussed in Section II of this document.
201 Wastewater Facilities Study, 1977 and 1995
A "201" Wastewater Facilities Study was prepared and adopted for Burgaw in 1977. This study
provides a 20-year planning period management and improvement program for Burgaw's sewer
facilities. A major recommendation of that plan was to correct the stormwater inflow problem
which caused occasional overload and to relocate effluent discharge to the Northeast Cape Fear
River. The town updated its 201 Wastewater Facilities Study in 1995. This study primarily
focused on evaluating the alternatives of expanding the treatment plant at its existing discharge
location, relocating the discharge to the Northeast Cape Fear River at N.C. Highway 53 and land
application of the discharge. Sewage disposal is discussed further under Part F, Development
Constraints: Public Facilities, of this section.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-39 1
1
1
7

u
Town of Burgaw Water and Sewer Impact Fee Ordinance, 1996
' North Carolina General Statute 160A-314 provides that a municipality may exercise certain powers
regarding water and sewer services to include the power to regulate fees. In conformance with
this statute, Burgaw enacted an ordinance which requires every applicant for a building permit for
' new construction or expansion of an existing building resulting in an increase in the ERU pay an
impact fee. The impact fee shall be based on the Table of Equivalent Residential Units (ERU) set
forth in Paragraph (D) of the Water and Sewer Impact Fee Ordinance.
Buildings and Building Regulations
' Chapter 4 of the Code of the Town of Burgaw adopts the North Carolina State building, plumbing,
electrical, heating, and residential codes. The town's building inspector is designated as the
enforcement officer. Chapter 4 also adopts the town's minimum housing code which established
' minimum standards for the maintenance of existing housing. The building inspector is also the
enforcement officer for the minimum housing code.
Utilities
Chapter 19 of the Town Code regulates use and construction of the town's water and sewer
' systems. Specifically the following are defined: fees and charges, where and how connections
may be made, enforcement authority, and permit requirements. The town is established as the
provider of both water and sewer service.
IPender County Wastewater Disposal Ordinance
The Pender County Wastewater Disposal Ordinance applies within Burgaw's planning jurisdiction
when septic tank usage is required. Generally, the ordinance requires that the installations of
septic tanks be approved by the Pender County Health Department.
'
Water and Sewer System Policies
With the exception of the following specific policies, Burgaw generally handles the decisions of
water and sewer service on a case -by -case basis, with the cost to the town being the most decisive
factor:
(1) At its own expense, Burgaw extends water and sewer mains to subdivisions
located with the town limits. However, the developer is responsible for the
service lines.
(2) Development located within 300 feet of existing water and/or sewer mains must
hook onto those mains.
(3) Under Burgaw's Subdivision Regulations, a developer is required to install water
and sewer services in subdivisions with lot sizes less than 20,000 square feet.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-40 1

(4) Water service, if available in the planning jurisdiction, may be obtained for twice
the regular tap fee.
(5) Impact fees are charged for new water service connections in accordance with the
town's Impact Fee Ordinance.
11. Basinwide Water Ouality Management
The Water Quality Division of the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (NCDENR) has initiated a basinwide approach to state water quality management. The
overall goal of basinwide management is to develop consistent and effective long range water
quality management strategies that protect the quality and intended uses of North Carolina's
surface waters while accommodating population increases and economic growth.
Basinwide management is not a new regulatory program. Rather, it is a watershed -based
management approach which features basinwide permitting of discharges, integration of existing
point and nonpoint source regulatory programs, and preparation of basinwide water quality
management plans for each of the state's 17 river basins by 1998. Plans will be updated at five
year intervals.
The purpose of the basinwide management plan is to communicate to policy makers, the regulated
community, and the general public, the state's rationale, approaches, and long-term strategies for
each basin. In general, this process involves the following five major phases of development:
-- Collecting pertinent water quality and related information,
-- Analyzing the information and targeting problem areas,
-- Developing management strategies,
-- Circulating a draft plan for public review and comment, and
-- Finalizing the plan.
Eight of North Carolina's major river basins cross the coastal area. These include the Lumber,
Cape Fear, White Oak, Neuse, Tar -Pamlico, Roanoke, Chowan, and Pasquotank river basins. The
Division of Water Quality has further subdivided these basins into smaller "sub -basins," which
are currently used as the foundation for their basinwide water quality plans. Even smaller
watersheds were recently delineated for the entire state by the USDA Natural Resources
Conservation Service. These watersheds are referred to as "14-digit hydrologic units" (because
of the unique 14-digit code assigned to each watershed) or simply "small watersheds." These
small watersheds generally range in size from 5,000 to 50,000 acres.
The Town of Burgaw is located in the Cape Fear River basin. The Cape Fear basinwide
management plan was completed in October, 1996.
The long-range basinwide management goal is to provide a means of addressing the complex
problem of planning for reasonable economic growth while protecting and/or restoring the quality
and intended uses of the Cape Fear Basin's surface waters.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-41 1
D
1

I
' In striving towards the long-range goal stated above, the Division of Water Quality's highest
priority near -term goals will be the following:
-- Identify and restore the most seriously impaired waters in the basin;
-- Protect those waters known to be of the highest quality or supporting biological
-- communities of special importance;
Manage problem pollutants, particularly nutrients, biological oxygen demand,
sediment, and fecal coliform, in order to correct existing water quality problems
and to ensure protection of those waters currently supporting their uses.
The North Carolina Division of Water Quality has identified 16 sub -basins, each including
numerous watersheds within the Cape Fear Basin. Each sub -basin and watershed have been
assigned a numerical code for the purpose of identification.
The Town of Burgaw is located entirely within the Natural Resources Conservation Service small
watershed 03030007110020 which is located within the Division of Water Quality sub -basin
03-06-23. The following provides a summary of water quality concerns, relevant to sub -basin 03-
06-23, as found in the Cape Fear River Basinwide Water Quality Management Plan:
Maintenance of dissolved oxygen is critical to the survival of aquatic life and to the general health of North
'
Carolina's surface waters. While there are relatively few streams in the Cape Fear River basin that are
experiencing significant impairment from low levels of dissolved oxygen (DO), there are many miles of
streams, including the mainstem of the river, in which DO levels are precariously low and where models
predict that dissolved oxygen standards may be violated by new or expanding wastewater treatment plants.
The daily average dissolved oxygen standard for most waters in the state, and in the Cape Fear basin, is 5.0
mg/l. Waters classified as swamp waters may have naturally lower dissolved oxygen. The appropriate level
' of dissolved oxygen for swamp waters will vary from stream to stream. Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD)
and ammonia nitrogen (NH3) associated with wastewater treatment plants are generally the types of oxygen -
consuming wastes of greatest concern. This is because the lowest concentrations of dissolved oxygen usually
' occur during summertime conditions when temperature is high and streamflow is low. During these periods,
point source discharges have their greatest impact, while nonpoint source pollution input, which results from
rainfall events, is generally low. Therefore, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
permits for wastewater facilities generally limit BOD5 (or CBOD5) and NH3 in point source discharge
Ieffluents to control the effects of oxygen depletion in receiving waters.
Sub -basin 03-06-23 This sub -basin includes the Lower NE Cape Fear .River which is classified swamp
waters. The Biological Assessment group has been collecting data here as part of its swamp study to refine
methods of rating swamp waters. Most waters are rated fair and good -fair. Dissolved oxygen (DO) levels
at the ambient station at Hwy 117 drop to 3-5 mg/1 during summer months due to the influence of the
discharges, the salt wedge, swamp waters, and high temperatures. The former Ammons - Northchase
' WWTP (now Bridgeport) has been purchased by New Hanover County with plans to connect it to a regional
treatment plant.
Osgood Canal/Burgaw Creek Portions of the Cape Fear River Basin may be characterized as having low
ground water yields. Due to this geology, streams in this basin can have very low summer flows. The Town
of Burgaw wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) is permitted to discharge up to 0.5 MGD to Osgood Canal
'/2 mile above its confluence with Burgaw Creek, which flows through a slow moving swamp area to the
Northeast Cape Fear River. The low flow conditions Osgood Canal frequently experiences during the
summer can magnify adverse environmental effects resulting from WWTP discharge. In fact, biological
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-42 '
F
U

E.
sampling of benthic macroinvertebrate and fish communities done in 1987 and 1985, respectively, has shown '
Burgaw Creek to be substantially impaired by the discharge. During summers from 1991 to 1993, the
Burgaw WWTP had 7 effluent violations of the monthly BODS limit and 8 violations of the NH3-N limit.
The facility was under a Special Order by Consent which allowed relaxed limits for BODS and NH; N, and
required compliance with final NPDES effluent limitations by June 30, 1996. The Town of Burgaw has
submitted a 201 Plan and Environmental Assessment which evaluated the alternatives of expanding the
treatment plant at the current discharge location, relocating the discharge to the Northeast Cape Fear River
at N.C. Highway 53, and land application of the discharge.
An up-to-date discussion on the status of Burgaw's WWTP and its compliance with NPDES
effluent limitations is discussed in the Development Constraints: Public Facilities section of this
plan.
LAND AND WATER USE COMPATIBILITY ANALYSIS
1. Sinificant Land Compatibility Problems '
The town's 1993 Land Use Plan Update described the conflict between transient traffic on N.C.
53 and local traffic within Burgaw's central business district as the most significant land use
compatibility problem. This problem has been recognized and is addressed in the town's
Thoroughfare Plan and in the state's Transportation Improvement Plan via construction of a '
bypass. However, this project is currently being studied for feasibility, and if determined feasible,
would not be scheduled for planning/design, right-of-way acquisition, and construction until after
the year 2004. As a result, the conflict between N.C. 53 transient traffic and local traffic will
continue to escalate before it is reduced.
Commercialization along the town's highway corridors and its effects on traffic flow and '
compatibility with existing development remains a concern. In the event that commercial
development is allowed to fill the N.C. 53 corridor between the intersections with U.S. 117 and
I-40, existing residential development could be significantly infringed upon. In addition, there is ,
also a need to control commercial development along N.C. 53 and the U.S. 117 bypass to preserve
their traffic carrying capacity. Each time a new curb cut is allowed, it decreases the traffic
carrying capacity of these highways. Highway entrances and exits should be regulated through
the town's zoning and subdivision ordinances to improve traffic control and facilitate traffic flow.
The incorporation of some type of limited access highway commercial zoning district into the
town's zoning ordinance would help to accommodate this need. The purpose of a limited access
commercial district is to provide for, encourage, and protect the compatible grouping and
development of commercial uses which are appropriate on major arteries. Such uses are dependent
upon vehicular traffic and are subject to public view, requiring that provisions are made for
appearance, parking and loading, and controlled traffic movement. '
As development increases within Burgaw's ETJ and the sites suitable for construction become
scarce, the conflict between protecting and developing 404 wetland areas will become an
increasingly significant issue. Burgaw should continue to be sensitive to 404 wetland areas and
does so through its planning and subdivision approval processes. In 1993, the Town of Burgaw
adopted a revised subdivision ordinance which added, among other things, the requirement that
404 wetland areas be mapped on all preliminary and final plats.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-43 1 1

L
I
1
2. Problems from Unplanned Development
The town has added a planner to its staff and maintains a strong active planning board, who work
together to implement an effective planning program. However, there is the potential for land use
conflicts due to incompatibilities between existing land uses and current zoning patterns. In
particular, zoning discrepancies exist along the former rail corridor between Dickson and Dudley
Streets and surrounding the Dialysis Center on Dickson Street. Both of these areas include vacant
industrial zoned property which, if developed, could create conflicting land uses. It is
recommended that the town re-examine the location of its zoning districts in relation to existing
development and consider the possibility of rezoning some areas to establish consistency with
existing development. Since a detailed land use survey was conducted as part of this land use plan
update process, it would be advantageous for Burgaw to pursue this matter before additional
development occurs and existing conditions change substantially.
3. Areas Experiencing or Likely to Experience Major Land Use Chances
At the present time, there are two known areas where significant changes in land use patterns may
occur during the planning period. These areas include the N.C. 53 corridor between I-40 and the
U.S. 117 intersection and the proposed N.C. 53 Burgaw Bypass corridor. The need to regulate
the N.C. 53 corridor through possibly adding a limited access highway commercial district to the
town's zoning ordinance and limiting curb cuts has already been discussed in this plan.
Although it was not certain at the time this plan was adopted if the N.C. 53 Bypass would actually
be constructed, it would be in the town's best interest to begin planning for this project. The
approximate location of the N.C. 53 Bypass (Map provided on page II-10) passes through the
northern portion of Burgaw's extraterritorial jurisdiction. In response to the possibility that this
bypass may be constructed, the town should consider conducting a corridor study which would
provide a comprehensive analysis of the social, economic, land use, and environmental impacts
resulting from the proposed corridor. A CAMA technical assistance grant may be available to
assist with this project.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-44 1

F. DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINTS: PUBLIC FACILITIES I
1. Water Supply
All of the Town of Burgaw and portions of its ETJ are supplied water via the town's water
system. This system consists of four wells, which withdraw water from the Black Creek Aquifer,
and store it in three elevated water storage tanks. Most of the distribution system consists of 6"
lines with approximately 1,000 feet of 8" lines. Approximately 5% of the town's water lines are
undersized: 2-inch, 1-inch, and some 5/8-inch lines.
During calendar year 1996, the average daily water withdrawn from the Black Creek Aquifer by
the Town of Burgaw was 0.392 million gallons per day (MGD). There are some other
municipalities that withdraw water from this aquifer. The closest is Wallace which is
,
approximately 15 miles away, followed by Jacksonville which is approximately 35 miles away.
However, these municipalities do not withdraw enough water to have any adverse effect on
Burgaw's water supply. Table 20 provides a summary of the town's wells and water storage tanks
including their approximate location and capacity.
Table 20
,
Town of Burgaw Water System
Summary of Wells and Storage Tanks
Location Capacity
WELLS
S. Smith Street 275 gpm
W. Ashe Street 375 gpm
N. Wright Street 275 gpm
N. Smith Street 350 gpm
Total
1,275 gpm
ELEVATED STORAGE TANKS
Wilmington Street Ext. 100,000 gal.
Wilmington & Wright Street Ext. 75,000 gal.
N. Smith Street 500,000 gal.
Total 675,000 gal.
As Table 20 indicates, the town's wells have a combined pumping capacity of approximately 1,275
gallons per minute (gpm). These wells are controlled electronically and pumped alternately to the
storage tanks which have a combined capacity of 675,000 gallons. According to the N.C.
Department of Human Resources requirements, the water system has a capacity of 0.918 million
gallons per day (MGD). This is the quantity that the wells would provide if all four wells were
operated for a period of 12 hours.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-45 ,

The primary use of water has been residential since the system was first installed in the 1930s.
However, in recent years, more industry has located within the system's service area. Most of
these industries do not use water in their manufacturing process but collectively are using much
more water than in the past. The facility having the greatest demand for water is the state prison,
which expanded since the town's land use plan was last updated from 116 beds to 624 beds. The
Ltown's
major non-residential water users are as follows:
-- N.C. Department of Corrections State Prison
Gold Banner Meats, Inc.
_=
Four County Electrical Membership Corporation
-- Huntington Health Care Nursing Home
Hardee's
_=
Chloride Systems
-- Wieland North American Electronics
-- Leslie -Locke, Inc.
Table 21 provides a summary of Burgaw's water use during 1996.
Table 21
Town of Burgaw
Water Use, 1996
Total Monthly Water Average Daily Water
Month Use (MGM) Use (GPD)
January 11.2 361,186
February 10.9 374,885
March 11.4 369,286
April 11.3 378,003
May 12.3 395,440
June 12.1 402,942
July 12.6 406,952
August 12.4 399,780
September 11.8 391,716
October 13.1 421,239
November 12.4 412,606
December 12.2 393,652
Total 143.7 Average 392,307
MGM - Million gallons per month
GPD - Gallons per day
I
Source: Town of Burgaw Public Works Department.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-46 '

Table 21 indicates that in 1996 the town's monthly water use ranged from 10.9 MGM in February
to 13.1 MGM in October. In addition, average daily water use reached a high of 421,239 GPD
in October. The town does not have data readily available for minimum or maximum daily water
use.
The town has not had any water shortage problems within the past 15 years. There have been
some instances of poor pressure. However, those were due to facility monitoring devices at the
elevated storage tanks which were failing to activate well pumps as storage tank levels dropped.
This problem has since been corrected and has not reoccurred.
The Town of Burgaw may choose to pursue the extension of water service into the following areas
during the planning period:
-- Recently expanded portion of the Burgaw Industrial Park.
-- Along N.C. 53 to 1-40.
-- Wilmington Street Extension to serve areas near the golf course.
-- Along Annie P. Faison Road.
2. Sewage Disposal
The town's sewage disposal needs are met via a 750,000 gpd extended air wastewater treatment
plant (WWTP) and 10 lift stations. The WWTP is located on East Wallace Street and discharges
into Osgood Canal. Osgood Canal flows to Burgaw Creek which is a tributary of the Northeast
Cape Fear River.
Assuming approximately 95 % of the water distributed by the town's water system is returned to
the wastewater collection system, on average the WWTP discharges approximately 392,000 GPD.
However, the town's wastewater collection system has a problem with inflow. During periods of
heavy rainfall, the average daily flow may increase to as much as 600,000 GPD. As a result, on
those days, the town is attempting to treat approximately 350,000 gallons of rainwater. The town
is currently addressing this problem through the implementation of a smoke testing program which
will pinpoint areas where sewer lines are failing. Following smoke testing, an infrastructure
rehabilitation project, which will include sewer line and man -hole replacement, will be initiated.
The presence of the sewer system eliminates the need for private package treatment plant usage
within the town's corporate area and therefore is not an issue. Within the town's ETJ, Burgaw
supports the construction of package treatment plants which are approved and permitted by the
state Division of Water Quality.
During the planning period, the Town of Burgaw may pursue the extension of sewer service into
the following areas:
-- Recently expanded portion of the Burgaw Industrial Park.
— U.S. 117 between Wilmington Street and N.C. 53.
-- Along N.C. 53 to I-40.
-- Along Annie P. Faison Road.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-47 '
r

I
I
Anyone who discharges into the surface waters of the state must have a National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit. The issuance of an NPDES Permit follows the
requirements contained in 15A NCAC 2H.0100. An application for a permit must be made to the
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) to obtain or renew an NPDES Permit. The Town of Burgaw
is in compliance with all NPDES effluent limitations and its permit is renewed annually. The
following table provides a list of NPDES permitted treatment plants within watershed sub -basin
03-06-23. This watershed sub -basin includes the Town of Burgaw. Basinwide water quality
management and an explanation of watersheds is included in the Existing Land Use section of this
plan.
Table 22
Watershed Sub -basin 03-06-23
NPDES Permits
Facility Stream Receiving Discharge Sub -basin
Action Mold & Die Company, Inc.
UT Osgood Branch
03-06-23
Beach Front/Harrison Creek Ventures
Harrison Creek
03-06-23
Burgaw WWTP
Osgood Canal
03-06-23
East Coast Limestone, Inc.
Angola Creek
03-06-23
Fast Fare ##550
Osgood Branch
03-06-23
Martin Marietta Aggregates/Rocky Point
UT Northeast Cape Fear
03-06-23
Pender High School
Long Creek
03-06-23
Source: Division of Water Quality.
Draina e
As the Town of Burgaw has developed, flooding and drainage problems have become an issue of
increasing significance. In fact, at the town -wide meeting conducted on November 18, 1997, as
part of this land use plan update process, the citizens of Burgaw identified stormwater drainage
needs and issues as the single most important issue currently facing the town (the complete ranking
of land use issues identified at the town -wide meeting has been provided in the Existing Land Use
section of this plan). Areas especially susceptible to flooding within Burgaw's planning
jurisdiction include the following:
1. South side of Wilmington Street between Chowan Street and Campbell Street.
2. West side of South Chowan Street between Fremont Street and S. Walker Street.
3. Kristi Circle area off Bickett Street.
4. N.C. 53 from Stag Park Road to the I-40 Interchange.
5. Portions of Stag Park Industrial Area.
The general locations of these areas have been provided on Map 4.
Although these are the areas where the most significant flooding occurs within Burgaw's planning
jurisdiction, other isolated areas which experience occasional flooding also exist.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-48 '

f
1
i
1
1
1
1
f
1
1
1
1
1
FLOODPRONE AREAS
MAP 4
140TE: f LOODPRON E AREAS 1=5 A E
DISCUSSED IN SECTION I, PAGE 48.
-4 O
h�
73 ��
STAG PARK ROAD
a
32 �
O
N B,U-R17 AW G
SR 12
'CO 2 KRISTI-CIRCLE N
3-
The preparation of this map was financed in part
v through a grant provided by the North Carolina
Coastal Management Program, through funds provided
/ by the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as
amended, which is administered by the Office of
Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
I-49 '

At the present time, the town is conducting a stormwater management study which will identify
specific problem areas and provide a model stormwater management ordinance. Following
completion of this study, it may also be necessary for the town to pursue the completion of a
comprehensive drainage master plan including a schedule for routine and remedial maintenance
of public drainage ditches. It may also be beneficial to educate the community to the importance
of maintaining drainage ditches on private property. One means by which to do this could be
through the distribution of an informational brochure. In addition, the town intends to revise its
zoning ordinance to include a floodplain district which will effectively control development within
flood hazard areas.
As urban development continues in Burgaw's planning jurisdiction, so will the construction of
impervious and semi -permeable surfaces, and the potential for flooding will increase. Given that
,. fact, Burgaw may choose to reevaluate its current policies regarding impervious surfaces. For
example, the Town of Burgaw may choose to limit the total area covered by impervious surfaces
�1
H
on a given lot to 20 % of the total lot area or under some circumstances allow stabilized soil
parking lots.
4. Solid Waste Disposal
Curbside trash pickup is provided to the town's residences and businesses once per week via a
contract with ARS Waste Industries. The provision and pickup of commercial dumpsters are
handled on a case -by -case basis.
In 1993, when the town's land use plan was last updated, solid waste originating in Burgaw was
transported to the Pender County Landfill located approximately 4 miles west of town. However,
this facility reached its capacity in 1995 and has since been closed. Pender County's demands for
solid waste disposal are now being met via a contract with Waste Industries, Inc. Waste Industries
is responsible for hauling the majority of Pender County's solid waste to the Sampson County
Landfill. Some material is also transported to landfills located in Brunswick County and New
Hanover County. The county's contract with Waste Industries expires in the year 2002. At that
time, the Pender County Board of Commissioners will re-evaluate the contract and consider it for
extension. The Sampson County Landfill is estimated to have a life expectancy of between 25-50
years.
An analysis of local government solid waste streams is conducted annually by the Division of
Pollution Prevention and Environmental Assistance (DPPEA). The following table provides a
summary of this analysis for the Town of Burgaw. The information provided is for fiscal year
(July -June) 1994-1995.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-50 1

Table 23
Town of Burgaw
Quick Waste Stream Analysis
Material
Local tonnage
Total Paper
921
Newsprint
135
Cardboard
345
Magazines
28
Office Paper
108
Mixed Paper Total
306
Glass
163
Aluminum Cans
21
Steel Cans
27
Total Plastic
94
PETE
12
HDPE
17
Other Plastic
65
Pallets and Wood Crates
220
Food Wastes
188
White Goods
41
Other Metal
N/A
Special Wastes
Used Oil (Do-it-yourself gallons)
2,791
HHW (tons)
12
Used Paint (HHW subset)
2
Antifreeze
N/A
Note: This analysis seeks to identify the presence of basic materials in a community's waste stream. The
"Local tonnage" column is based on the state averages for each material.
Source: Division of Pollution Prevention and Environmental Assistance.
The town currently does not have a recycling program in place; however, it does provide a dropoff
station at the town garage for recyclables such as newspapers; green, clear, and brown glass
containers; plastic containers; aluminum products; and used oil. The recycling center is open
Wednesday afternoons and Saturday mornings for dropoff. In addition, curbside recycling is
provided by ARS Waste Industries.
The town is currently considering expanding its recycling efforts at the town garage to include
cardboard recycling and possibly even providing a mulch pile and yard waste area. In this event,
deposited mulch and yard waste could be recycled and utilized for landscaping and as a form of
fertilizer.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-51 1

1 5. Police
The Town of Burgaw Police Department is staffed by seven full-time officers including the Chief
of Police. All officers maintain state certification. In addition, auxiliary officers are available if
needed. The department maintains six patrol cars, two of which are unmarked. Officers routinely
patrol the streets, check businesses for locked doors, and provide escort services to businesses
making bank deposits. The police department has applied for state funds through the Governor's
Crime Commission to help provide for an additional full-time officer. In addition, the police chief
has asked that two more officers be budgeted into the town's expenditures. As a result, it is
conceivable that three additional officers may be added to the department within the next year.
6. Fire Protection
The Town of Burgaw Fire Department has been in operation since 1935. When this plan was
drafted, the department consisted of one full-time Fire Administrator and 36 volunteer members.
The Fire Department Board of Directors is comprised of elected officers who govern the
department.
The Fire Administrator position is a relatively new position having been added since the land use
plan was last updated. The Fire Administrator is responsible for fire inspections, pre -fire
planning, equipment maintenance, overseeing training of personnel, and public relations, and
generally serves as a liaison between the Town Board and the Burgaw Fire Department. At the
present time, the town's Fire Administrator is also serving as the town's Fire Marshal. This
position is appointed by the Fire Department Board of Directors. The Fire Marshal's duties
include making inspections of all businesses at least once a year to ensure that fire code
requirements are being met.
rFire Department facilities are housed in the new Fire Station adjacent to Town Hall. The town
currently owns five Class A pumpers (250 gallon, 750 gallon, 1,000 gallon, 1,250 gallon, and
1,500 gallon), two tankers (each with a 1,250 gallon capacity), and one 400 gallon quick attack
truck. The department has plans to sell its 750 gallon pumper.
The fire department does not have a hazardous materials response team. In the event of a
hazardous materials spill, the town would have to solicit aid from the Regional Response Fire
Department in Wilmington, which has a hazardous materials team. The Regional Response team
in Wilmington is one of six serving the state of North Carolina.
Fire protection services for the town appear to be adequate through the planning period.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-52 '
i

7. Administration I
The Town of Burgaw has a manager/council form of government. There are 30 full-time
employees working for the town. Following is a list of governmental organizations and employees.
Department
# of Individuals
Administration
3
Cemetery
1
Planning and Inspections
2 (plus 1 part-time)
Police
7
Fire Administrator
1
Public Works:
'
Garage (Mechanic)
1
Sanitation
3
Streets
5
Water and Sewer
7
Total
30
Boards/Commissions
# of Individuals
Board of Adjustment
6
Planning Board
9
Tree Board
Board of Commissioners
5
5
Total
25
The town currently has a demand for 1-3 additional police officers, a public works director, and
an additional administrative position. Assuming these positions will be budgeted and filled, the
town will be adequately staffed to meet current needs. However, it is anticipated that additional
planning and inspections personnel may be warranted during the planning period. The town will
continue to utilize college interns as needed.
8. Transportation
Major thoroughfares serve as the primary movers of traffic in an urban area. The following is a
list of major thoroughfares in Burgaw:
U.S. 117 Business
SR 1344 Wallace Street
'
U.S. 117 Bypass
SR 1345A Old Savannah Road
N.C. 53 Business
SR 1400 Highsmith Road
N.C. 53 Bypass
SR 1510 Wilmington Street
SR 1214 Dickerson
SR 1551 Bridgers Street
SR 1216 Piney Woods Road
SR 1557 Smith Avenue
SR 1332 Penderlea Highway
Progress Drive
SR 1340 New Savannah Road
Wright Street
SR 1343 Henry Brown Road
McNeil Street
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-53 1 1

Minor thoroughfares serve local traffic within an urban area. The following is a list of minor
thoroughfares in Burgaw:
SR 1208 Hayes Road
SR 1343 Henry Brown Road
SR 1432 Clark Street
SR 1509 Stag Park Road
SR 1557 Smith Avenue
Dickerson Street
Dudley Street
Freemont Street
McNeil Street
Walker Street
Williams Street
Wright Street
In 1996, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) conducted traffic counts
within Burgaw and portions of its ETJ. The 1996 Annual Average Daily Traffic (ADT) counts
for selected areas of Burgaw have been provided on Map 5.
As Map 5 indicates, the largest traffic volume experienced within Burgaw's planning jurisdiction
is just east of town on N.C. 53 with an ADT county of 8,100 vehicles. Additional high traffic
volume locations include the intersection of Wright Street and Wilmington Street/N.C. 53 (ADT
7,400) and Old Duplin Road/U.S. 117 just south of Wilmington Street/N.C. 53 (ADT 7,000).
Powell Bill funding for the town is based on 16.0 miles of town -maintained roads. Approximately
500 feet of unimproved roads remain within Burgaw.
In 1995, the NCDOT, in cooperation with the Town of Burgaw, completed a thoroughfare plan
for the town. That plan included the following recommendations:
"Major Thoroughfare Recommendations: The first recommendation is a bypass of the
central business district (CBD). This will allow through traffic to avoid this area,
lessening the downtown congestion. As an added bonus, the bypass will also remove
much of the truck traffic in town, increasing the capacity as well as the safety of the
downtown streets.
An urban loop is also recommended. This project seems favorable because the majority
of the loop is already in place. Using existing streets saves on construction and right-of-
way cost, and avoids disruption of personal and business properties. Burgaw currently
has a radial street system. This causes traffic to flow through the central part of town,
where the radials converge. A loop allows traffic to travel from the radial streets to
different parts of town without passing through the center of town. The loop will lessen
the congestion in the center of town, allow for easier access to N.C. 53 and U.S. 117, and
lessen travel time from various points to Burgaw's Hospital. To make travel to
southbound I-40 more accessible, a connection from the loop and U.S. 117 to I-40 was
requested by several members of the Burgaw Planning Board.
N.C. 53 should be widened to a five -lane curb and gutter section from I-40 to the N.C.
53 Bypass. The normal projected growth of the area, coupled with the increase in traffic
caused by the bypass and new frontage road, will cause this section to be over capacity
unless it is widened.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-54 ,

1996 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC COUNTS
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
r
MAP 5
4g
-)a
3;1 /.
.` •` 3,300
2,100
•v.
BUR-aw, 40 >7yOOO
• O
SOURCE: NCDOT '
— -- -- •— •— •— City Limit Line (Approximate Location)
900
700 '� I
� I
I
I
i
Cfs
'' ♦ 77 QOO The preparation of this map was financed in part
' ♦ , 8 through a grant provided by the North Carolina
• ' ♦ Coastal Management Program, through funds provided
' \ by the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as
_ — • -- • amended, which is administered by the Office of
' \ • �• • Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National
, 440 5,700
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
1
• . ' • ' • ' • • ' • ETJ Line (Approximate Location)
I-55 '

Minor Thoroughfare Recommendations: A road connecting N.C. 53 to Stag Park Road
(SR 1509) near I-40 would provide interstate access for this growing industrial section,
as well as make it a more attractive location for businesses and factories.
Other Recommendations: The removal of parking on certain downtown streets may also
be necessary. This will allow the entire width of the street to be used for traffic flow,
increasing the capacity of the street. Removal of parking will benefit Wilmington Street
from N.C. 53/U.S. 117 to Smith Street, and Freemont Street from Cowan Street to Smith
Street. "
According to the NCDOT 1997 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP), there is only one
transportation improvement project listed that is relevant to the Town of Burgaw. This project
includes the construction of a N.C. 53 bypass. This project, which the town fully supports, is
discussed further in Section II of this plan.
1 9. Emergency Rescue
Emergency services are provided via the Pender County Rescue Squad. The entire county is
divided into five separate rescue service areas. The Town of Burgaw is located in what is referred
to as the Pender Central Rescue Service Area. This area is served by two separate stations, one
located in Rocky Point and the other located at 102 E. Wilmington Street in Burgaw. These
stations are operated by a total of 60 volunteers. Equipment utilized to serve Pender Central
includes the following: 3 ambulances and 2 rescue units. The four remaining rescue service areas
in Pender County include the Union, Hampstead, Surf City, and Topsail Beach service areas.
Town of Burgaw residents are taxed $.04 per $100 real property value for rescue services. Rescue
services are expected to remain adequate during the planning period.
10. Electrical Distribution
Electrical service is provided to Burgaw residents by the Carolina Power and Light Company.
However, residents residing within the town's extraterritorial jurisdiction are provided service via
the Four County Electric Membership Corporation. It appears that distribution will be adequate
through the planning period.
At the present time, there are no energy generating facilities located within Burgaw's planning
jurisdiction. Therefore, energy facility siting and development has not been an issue for the town.
11. Telephone Service
Telephone service is provided to the town by BellSouth Telephone Company. There are no
deficiencies in service, and it appears that service will be adequate through the planning period.
12. Cable Television
Cable television service has been provided to the town by Time Warner Cable of Wilmington and
it appears that it will be adequate through the planning period.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-56 '

1
13. Schools I
The Town of Burgaw's youth are served by three of Pender County's schools. These schools
include Burgaw Elementary School on North Wright Street, Burgaw Middle School on South
Wright Street, and Pender High School on Highway 53, approximately 4 miles west of town.
Table 24 provides a comparison of enrollment between school years 1992-93 and 1997-98 and
indicates the current capacity of each school.
Table 24
Schools Serving the Town of Burgaw
Enrollment Comparison and Capacity
Grade Levels `92-`93 `97-`98
Served Enrollment Enrollment
Capacity*
Capacity Level
Burgaw Elementary K-5 572 502
378
33 % over
Burgaw Middle 6-8 660 470
Pender High 9-12 1,200 1,228
416
1,005
13 % over
22% over
Total 2,432 2,200
1,799
22% over
*The
capacity of these schools were determined by the Pender County School System in January, 1998.
The capacity figures do not include outside relocatable classrooms.
Source: Pender County Schools.
As Table 24 indicates, between school years 1992-1993 and 1997-1998, enrollment at the three
schools serving Burgaw actually decreased by 232 students. This amounts to a drop of
approximately 10%. It is also of significance that although enrollment has decreased, all of these
schools remain over capacity. However, it is important to note that the capacity figures provided
do not take into account the many outside relocatable classrooms present at these schools. At the
present time, there are 5 mobile classrooms and 9 wood -frame relocatable classrooms at Burgaw
Elementary School, 8 wood -frame relocatable classrooms at Burgaw Middle School, and 4 mobile
classrooms and 4 wood -frame relocatable classrooms at Pender High School. Although these
outside relocatable classrooms significantly mitigate overcrowding problems at these schools,
additional classroom space is still needed.
Pender County recently acquired a site on Kelly Road in Rocky Point for the construction of a new ,
elementary and middle school. The county anticipates these new schools opening for the school
year 2000-2001. Although Burgaw's students will not be attending the Kelly Road schools, the
redistricting that will take place following construction will alleviate overcrowding at the schools
that Burgaw's students do attend.
Considering construction of these new schools, the school system appears to be adequate to meet
the town's needs through the planning period.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-57 ,

1
11
1
14. Recreation
Recreational facilities within the Town of Burgaw are somewhat limited. Harrell Memorial Park
located at Walker and Ashe Streets, Pender Memorial Park on South Smith Street, and the 9-hole
Buccaneer Golf Course and Country Club offer the only recreational opportunities in town. The
Vann Street Playground, which included a playground area and basketball goal, has been closed
since the last update of the town's land use plan.
Facilities located at the two parks in town include the following:
Harrell Memorial Park Pender Memorial Park
Playground Equipment 5 Baseball Fields
Tennis Court (1 of which is also used for Pop Warner football)
During the planning period, the town may consider increasing the number and type of recreational
facilities provided by the town. In this event, the town would benefit from the completion of a
comprehensive recreation plan intended to identify current deficiencies and provide a prioritization
of projects.
15. Health Services
Pender Memorial Hospital is the only hospital located in Pender County. This facility, located
at 507 E. Fremont Street, has been in operation since 1951 and is governed by an appointed board.
Although, in recent months, its administration has been stricken with an abundance of cash flow
problems, there is a great interest in finding a solution to keep the facility open. Pender Memorial
Hospital contains 80 beds and provides the following services to Pender, Duplin, and Bladen
counties.
• Acute Care
• Medical Surgical Hospital Care
• Critical Care Unit
• Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF)
• 24-Hour Emergency Department -
Professional Physicians
• Complete Radiology Laboratory
• Respiratory & Physical Therapy Depts
• Rocky Point Clinic
• Industrial Health Care Program
• Home Health Care Program
• Out -Patient Surgery
• Mammography Facility
• Out Patient Clinics
• Orthopedic
* Podiatry
• Vascular Surgery
• General Surgery
The New Hanover Regional Medical Center in Wilmington serves Burgaw's residents with their
more critical health care needs. Huntington Health Care Facility, a 91-bed nursing facility, and
Guardian Care, a 72-bed nursing facility, provide levels of care ranging from rest home to skilled
nursing. There are five private physicians, 3 in internal medicine and 2 surgeons, and three
dentists practicing in Burgaw. For more specialized medical care, residents travel to nearby
Wilmington. Health services appear to be adequate to serve the area's needs through the planning
period.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-58 1

G. DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINTS: LAND SUITABILITY I
1. Topography/Geology I
Pender County is on the lower Coastal Plain and ranges in elevation from sea level to 110 feet.
The soils in the county generally are nearly level and have short slopes along the main
drainageways. The Cape Fear River, which is in the southwest part of Pender County, drains
most of the county. However, the Black and Northeast Cape Fear Rivers are tributaries of the
Cape Fear River and also drain portions of the county. A few short streams in the southeast part
of the county drain into the Intracoastal Waterway. The flow of water in streams throughout the
county is slow, and small tributaries flow only after heavy rains.
The Cape Fear, Northeast Cape Fear, and Black Rivers are affected by tides. The few short
streams in the southeast part of the county are wide and shallow near sea level and become narrow
inland. Most of the floodplains along these streams are inundated each day at high tide.
Generally, the Town of Burgaw has a flat topography with no significant slopes exceeding six
percent. The steepest slopes tend to occur in the Aycock loam (0-6 % slope) and Baymeade fine
sand (1-4% slope) soils. Aycock loam soils are scattered throughout Burgaw and its ETJ while
the Baymeade fine sand soils are concentrated in two small areas in the far northeast portion of
Burgaw's ETJ. Map 7 on page I-62 provides a delineation of soil types within the town's planning
jurisdiction. The average elevation within Burgaw and its ETJ is approximately 50 feet above sea
level.
Within Pender County, groundwater provides the sole source of water supply for both public and
private systems. Subsurface water of good quantity and quality is found throughout the county.
The entire area is underlain by a large aquifer system from which potable water can be drawn at
various depths.
Four geologic strata comprise the aquifer system. Pleistocene and recent surficial sands' cover
most of Pender County and provide the principal water source for individual wells and rural
domestic supplies. In the surficial sands, water normally occurs under watertable conditions
within 15 feet of the land surface. Productivity of this aquifer is limited only by its thickness; it
is recharged directly by rainfall and is easily subject to contamination. The surficial sands are the
only potable water supply between the Cape Fear and Black Rivers, where the underlying strata
contain brackish water.
Yorktown clays, shell beds, and marls occur on a limited basis east of the Northeast Cape Fear
River. This formation is absent in the central and western sections of the county which includes
the Burgaw planning jurisdiction. The Castle Hayne aquifer is not extensively utilized for water
supply in the county. However, it may be valuable as a large, long-term water supply. The
Peedee Cretaceous sands, limestones, and marine clays occur throughout Pender County. West
of the Cape Fear River, the Peedee immediately underlies the surficial sands. In the eastern part
of the county, it occurs beneath and has hydraulic connection to the Castle Hayne aquifer. In both
areas, the Peedee is recharged directly by rainfall. The Peedee furnishes water to many wells
i
At or immediately below ground surface.
'
Section I: Analysis Existing Conditions
of I-59

I�
drilled west of the Northeast Cape Fear River. Wells relying on the Peedee vary from 50-200 feet
deep and yield up to 300 gallons per minute.
There are no significant surface waters within Burgaw's planning jurisdiction. The closest body
of water is the Northeast Cape Fear River which is located approximately five miles east of
Burgaw.
2. Flood Hazard Areas
Preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) showing elevations and flood hazard areas have
just been prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for the Town of
Burgaw. It is the town's understanding that FEMA is currently verifying the preliminary FIRMs
for Burgaw and that they will be officially finalized by 1999. However, detailed FIRMs have been
prepared for Pender County which include Burgaw's ETJ. Generally, within Burgaw's planning
jurisdiction, 100-year floodprone areas are located surrounding the east and west prongs of
Osgood Branch and Burgaw Creek. Flood hazard areas within Burgaw's planning jurisdiction are
indicated on Map 6.
It should be stressed that Map 6 indicates preliminary flood hazard data as provided to the town
by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. It is conceivable that these maps could be
changed slightly. However, Map 6 is intended only to provide a general indication of flood hazard
areas. Precise determinations should be made by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington
District.
3. Soils
According to the Soil Survey of Pender County, North Carolina, completed in April, 1990, by the
Natural Resources Conservation Service, there are 20 soil series located in Burgaw's planning
jurisdiction. The locations of these soil series are delineated on Map 7. Table 25 provides a
summary of soil characteristics including a delineation of prime farmland soils.
Out of the 20 total soil series found in Burgaw's planning jurisdiction, six are considered prime
farmland and two may be considered prime farmland when drained. The location of prime
farmland soils is indicative of productive agricultural lands. The Town of Burgaw desires to
maintain these areas.
All of the soils located within Burgaw's planning jurisdiction pose severe limitations for septic
tank usage. In addition, approximately one-half of the area within Burgaw's planning jurisdiction
is covered by hydric soils. A hydric soil is one which is saturated, flooded, or ponded long
enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part. "Anaerobic"
is defined as a condition in which molecular oxygen is absent from the environment. Hydric soils
also have a high probability of meeting the criteria for 404 jurisdictional wetlands. However,
confirmation of 404 wetland areas must be made by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Wilmington District.
As a result of the adverse soil conditions present in most of the town's ETJ, development in the
ETJ will be severely limited in areas where sewer service is not provided.
1 Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions 1-60 1

M r rM M M M r M= M r M = = = = = r
Table 25
Town of Burgaw
Soil Characteristics
Map Symbol
Soil Series
Slope
Depth to Seasonal
Flooding
Dwellings
Streets and Roads
Septic Tanks
High Water Table
Frequency
Without
(ft.)
(Surface)
Basements
HYDRIC SOILS
Gr (PFD)
Grantham loamy fine
0-2
0-1.0
None
Severe: wetness
Severe: low
Severe: wetness,
sand
strength, wetness
peres slowly
Gt (PFD)
Grifton loamy fine
0-2
0.5-1.0
None
Severe: wetness
Severe: wetness
Severe: wetness
sand
LNA
Leon find sand
0-2
0-1.0
None
Severe: cut banks
Severe: wetness
Severe: wetness,
cave, wetness
poor filter
LS
Liddell silt loam
0-2
+1-1.5
None
Severe: ponding
Severe: ponding
Severe: ponding
Me
Meggett loam
0-2
0-1.0
Rare
Severe: wetness
Severe: shrink
Severe: wetness,
swell, wetness
peres slowly
Mk
Muckalee loam
0-2
0.5-1.5
Frequent
Severe: cut banks
Severe: wetness,
Severe: flooding,
cave, wetness
flooding
wetness
Pn
Pantego
0-2
0-1.5
Rare
Severe: wetness
Severe: wetness
Severe: wetness
RA
Rains fine sandy loam
0-2
0-1.0
None
Severe: wetness
Severe: wetness
Severe: wetness
To
Torhunta mucky fine
0-2 .
0.5-1.5
Rare
Severe: cut banks
Severe: wetness
Severe: wetness
sandy loam
cave, wetness
Wo
Woodington fine sandy
0-2
0.5-1.0
None
Severe: cut banks
Severe: wetness
Severe: wetness
loam
cave, wetness
NON-HYDRIC SOILS
Aya (PF)
Aycock loam
0-6
4.0-6.0
None
Moderate:
Moderate: low
Severe: peres
wetness
strength
slowly
AyBZ (PF)
Aycock loam
0-6
4.0-6.0
None
Moderate:
Moderate: low
Severe: peres
wetness
strength
slowly
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-63 1

Table 25 (continued)
Map Symbol
Soil Series
Slope
Depth to Seasonal
Flooding
Dwellings
Streets and Roads
Septic Tanks
High Water Table
Frequency
Without
(ft.)
(Surface)
Basements
BaB
Baymeade find sand
1-4
4.0-5.0
None
Slight
Slight
Severe: poor
filter
EmA (PF)
Exum loam
0-2
2.0-3.0
None
Moderate:
Moderate: low
Severe: wetness,
wetness
strength, wetness
peres slowly
EuA
Exum-Urban land
—
2.0-3.0
None
Moderate:
Moderate: low
Severe: wetness,
complex
wetness
strength, wetness
peres slowly
Fo (PF)
Foreston loamy fine
0-2
2.0-3.5
None
Severe: cut banks
Moderate:
Severe: wetness
sand
cave, wetness
wetness
GoA (PF)
Goldsboro fine sandy
0-2
2.0-3.0
None
Severe: wetness
Moderate:
Severe: wetness
loam
wetness
ON (PF)
Onslow loamy fine
0-3
1.5-3.0
None
Severe: wetness
Moderate:
Severe: wetness
sand
wetness
PaA
Pactolus fine sand
0-2
1.5-3.0
None
Severe: cut banks
Moderate:
Severe: wetness,
cave, wetness
wetness
poor filter
Pt
Pits*
—
*Areas where the sandy soil material has been excavated to a depth of 10 to 30 feet.
(PFD) Prime farmland when drained.
(PF) Prime farmland.
Source: Natural Resource Conservation Service.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-64 '
M M = = = = r== r M= M= M M = = r

1 4. Manmade Hazards/Restrictions
There are no significant manmade hazards located within the Town of Burgaw. The greatest
concentrations of hazardous materials are below ground fuel storage tanks scattered throughout
the town's planning jurisdiction. In addition, there are several areas where chemicals and
pesticides are stored in the Burgaw area. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires
that facilities report certain chemical substances located on site. Specifically, under these
regulatory requirements, facilities with chemicals on the EPA's list of Extremely Hazardous
Substances present in a quantity equal to or in excess of their established Threshold Planning
Quantity or a 500 pound threshold (whichever number is less), as well as any hazardous chemical
present on site in a quantity equal to or greater than 10,000 pounds, must be included on an annual
' report called the Tier II. This report must be submitted by March 1st of each year to the North
Carolina Emergency Response Commission, the Local Emergency Planning Committee, and the
local fire department with jurisdiction over the reporting facility. Table 26 provides a list of
facilities located in the Burgaw area that submitted Tier II reports in 1995.
The most significant manmade hazard within Burgaw may be the heavy volume of truck traffic on
N.C. 53. As discussed in the Land and Water Use Compatibility Analysis section of this plan,
this traffic conflicts with local residential and commercial traffic. The streets are not designed to
accommodate the turns which are required of large commercial trucks. Additionally, the transient
' truck traffic travels through residential as well as congested commercial areas. There is a high
potential for accidents.
1
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-65 1

Facility Name
Address
Table 26
Burgaw Area
Tier Two Reporters, 1995
SIC
Burgaw Main DMS 100; Satchwell Street
4800
Bell South Telecommunications Burgaw, NC 28425
Crown 100 N. Walker Street
5541
Burgaw, NC 28425
GOGAS #14 415 N 117 Bypass
5541
Burgaw, NC 28425
Gold Banner Meats 108 Industrial Drive
2011
Burgaw, NC 28425
N.C. Department of 401 N. Smith Street
9991
Transportation Burgaw, NC 28425
N.C. Natural Gas Corp. 115 Wright Street
4924
Burgaw, NC 28425
Parkers Superette Highway 210
5541
Burgaw, NC 28425
Key to Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Codes:
SIC 2011 - Meat Packing Plants
SIC 4800 - Communications
SIC 4924 - Natural Gas Distribution
SIC 5171 - Petroleum Bulk Stations and Terminals, Heating Oil, LP Gas
SIC 5191 - Farm Supplies, Lawn and Garden Supplies
SIC 5541 - Gasoline Service Stations, Convenience Store with Gas
SIC 9991 - Department of Transportation
Source: Division of Emergency Management, 1995.
Facility Name
Address
SIC
Pender Correctional Institution
906 Penderlea Highway
Burgaw, NC 28425
Pender Gas and Oil Co.
8855 N.C. Highway 53W
5171
Burgaw, NC 28425
Rooks Farm Service, Inc.
501 N. Dudley Street
5191
Burgaw, NC 28425
Scotchman #14
Wilmington & Smith
5541
Burgaw, NC 28425
Scotchman #59
Highway 117
5541
Burgaw, NC 28425
Worsley Oil Co.
Highway 53 West
5541
Burgaw, NC 28425
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-66 ,
�= M M M i M r M M M M r M r M M M

ICII
LJ
1
5. Fragile Areas
Subchapter 7H of Chapter 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code (15A NCAC 7H)
provides the state's definition of areas of environmental concern (AECs). Those areas include
coastal wetlands, ocean hazard areas, estuarine shorelines, inlet hazard areas, public trust waters,
coastal complex natural areas, coastal areas sustaining remnant species, significant coastal
archaeological resources, and significant coastal historic architectural resources. There are no
AECs located within Burgaw's planning jurisdiction. Therefore, the CAMA minor and major
permit requirements do not apply.
However, there are significant non -AEC fragile areas which must be identified and their impacts
on Burgaw discussed. Those are summarized in the following sections, 5.a. through 5.e.
a. 404 Wetlands
The most significant fragile areas in Burgaw are the 404 wetland areas. 404 wetlands are
lands that are wet at least part of the year because their soils are either saturated or
covered with a shallow layer of water. Wetlands include a variety of natural systems,
such as marshes, swamps, bottomland hardwoods, pocosins, and wet flats. While each
wetland type looks and functions differently, all wetlands share certain properties,
including characteristic wetland vegetation, hydric soils, and hydrologic features. Usually
wetlands are covered by plants, ranging from marsh grasses to trees. All wetland plants
must tolerate living in saturated soil without oxygen during parts of the growing season.
Many wetland plants are called "hydrophytes" because they can live with their roots in
water. Soils that have developed in wetlands are known as "hydric" soils because they
have formed under water-logged conditions. They have distinctive color, texture, and
sometimes odor. The presence of hydric soil means an area was once a wetland; however,
it does not by itself mean that the area functions as a wetland today.
The hydric soils are located on Map 7 and include the following soils series: Grantham,
Grifton, Leon, Muckalee, Meggett, Pantego, Rains, Torhunta, and Woodington. The
reader is cautioned that precise determinations of 404 wetland areas must be made through
"in -field" site analysis by a representative of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Wilmington District. Because of the extensive areas of hydric soils in Burgaw's planning
jurisdiction, public and private development should only be undertaken after an on -site
investigation for 404 wetland areas has been conducted by the Wilmington Office of the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Different types of wetlands perform various natural functions, many of which are
' important to coastal North Carolina. The role of wetlands as a valuable wildlife habitat
has long been recognized. More recently their critical roles in protecting water quality,
preventing floods and erosion, and maintaining fish populations have become evident.
In addition, numerous economically important products and activities depend on wetlands.
Fish, shellfish, blue crabs and shrimp - vital to commercial and sport fisheries - use
coastal saltmarshes for habitat and food. Inland freshwater wetlands also affect estuarine
water quality and productivity; thus, they too influence fisheries.
ISection I: Analysis of Existing Conditions 1-67 1

An important use of freshwater wetlands in coastal North Carolina is timber production.
Many wetland areas, if managed properly, can produce forest products without
substantially detracting from their other wetland functions. '
Other traditional wetland uses of economic importance include hunting, fishing, and
trapping. The water infiltration and flood protection roles of wetlands are also of
economic value, since they save money that would otherwise be spent on runoff control,
water treatment, and property preservation.
The many functions and values of wetlands interrelate to provide a natural resource that t
is important to protecting and maintaining the productivity and environmental quality of
the coastal area.
b. Slopes in Excess of 12 %
There are no slopes located within the Town of Burgaw's planning jurisdiction which are
in excess of 12%.
C. Excessive Erosion Areas
There are no excessive erosion areas located within the Town of Burgaw's planning
jurisdiction.
'
d. Historic and Archaeological Sites
The North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources, Division of Archives and History,
has indicated that there is one known archaeological site located within Burgaw's planning
jurisdiction. However, the town has never been systematically surveyed to determine the
location of archaeological resources. Therefore, additional sites may exist. All
'
archaeological site locations are restricted information and locations may not be included
in any public document or made available to any individual without the permission of the
state archaeologist. Any development projects should be implemented under appropriate
historic preservation legislation and in coordination with the Division of Archives and
History to avoid damage to valuable archeological resources.
,
Based on the Division of Archives and History files, the following structures of historic/
archeological significance are located with Burgaw:
-- Burgaw Depot, 102 East Fremont Street, Burgaw. Listed in the National
Register of Historic Places on July 24, 1986.
-- Pender County Courthouse Square, Burgaw. Listed in the National
Register on May 10, 1979.
,
In 1990, over 13 % of the town's dwelling units had been constructed prior to 1940.
Renovations or demolitions of older structures should be coordinated with the Division
of Archives and History to ensure the preservation of historically and/or architecturally
significant structures.
'
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions 1-68 1 1

e. Natural Resource Fragile Areas
' Natural resource fragile areas are generally recognized to be of educational, scientific, or
cultural value because of the natural features of the particular site. Features in these areas
serve to distinguish them from the vast majority of the landscape.
These areas include complex natural areas, areas that sustain remnant species, pocosins,
wooded swamps, prime wildlife habitats, or registered natural landmarks. In the vicinity
of the Town of Burgaw, there are fragile natural areas located within the hardwood
swamps along Burgaw Creek and Osgood Branch (including the east prong).
While these areas are not recognized as a 15A NCAC 7H Area of Environmental Concern
(AEC), they are important to the environmental integrity of the Burgaw Creek and Osgood
Branch. Primary responsibility for protection of the swamp lies in the 404 wetlands
regulatory process. In addition to the physical significance of this area, the swamp forests
provide a valuable open space area adjacent to the developed areas of Burgaw.
6. Areas of Resource Potential
' a. Agricultural and Forestlands
' Within Burgaw's planning jurisdiction, the following are considered by the U.S.
Department of Agriculture to be prime farmland agricultural soils: Grifton loamy fine
sand, Grantham loam, Aycock loam, Exum loam, Foreston loamy fine sand, Goldsboro
fine sandy loam, Onslow loam fine sand. It should be noted that the Grifton and
Grantham soils are considered prime farmland only where drained. Most of Burgaw's
undeveloped prime agricultural lands are located in the extraterritorial area north and
' northeast of the town where extensive areas are occupied by the Exum loam soils. (See
Map 7).
' Almost all of the soils within Burgaw's planning jurisdiction have good potential for both
hardwood and coniferous trees. These soils include: Aycock loam, Exum, Foreston,
Goldsboro, Grantham, Grifton, Liddell, Onslow, Pactolus, Pantego, Rains, Torhunta, and
' Woodington.
In summary, there are extensive commercially productive agricultural and forestlands
located within Burgaw's planning jurisdiction.
b. Public Parks
' There are two public parks located within Burgaw (see page I-52). These facilities have
only local significance. As discussed elsewhere in this plan, the Town of Burgaw may
consider the acquisition of property for an additional park in the town during the planning
period.
1
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-69 1

C. Marine Resources I
The North Carolina Division of Water Quality assigns water quality classifications to all '
waters of the State of North Carolina. The classifications are based upon the existing or
contemplated best usage of the various streams and segments of streams within a basin,
as determined through studies, evaluations, and comments received at public hearings.
The classifications for fresh waters are as follows:
Class WS-I: water protected as water supplies which are in natural and undeveloped ,
watersheds; point source discharges of treated wastewater are permitted
pursuant to Rules .0104 and .0211 of this Subchapter; local programs to
control nonpoint source and stormwater discharge of pollution are '
required; suitable for all Class C uses;
Class WS-II: waters protected as water supplies which are generally in predominantly
undeveloped watersheds; point source discharges of treated wastewater '
are permitted pursuant to Rules .0104 and .0211 of this Subchapter; local
programs to control nonpoint source and stormwater discharge of
pollution are required; suitable for all Class C uses; '
Class WS-III: waters protected as water supplies which are generally in low to
moderately developed watersheds; point source discharges of treated
'
wastewater are permitted pursuant to Rules .0104 and .0211 of this
Subchapter; local programs to control nonpoint source and stormwater
discharge of pollution are required; suitable for all Class C uses;
'
Class WS-IV: waters protected as water supplies which are generally in moderately to
highly developed watersheds; point source discharges of treated
wastewater are permitted pursuant to Rules .0104 and .0211 of this
,
Subchapter; local programs to control nonpoint source and stormwater
discharge of pollution are required; suitable for all Class C uses;
,
Class WS-VI: waters protected as water supplies which are generally upstream and
draining to Class WS-IV waters; no categorical restrictions on watershed
development or treated wastewater discharges are required, however, the
'
Commission or its designee may apply appropriate management
requirements as deemed necessary for the protection of downstream
receiving waters (15A NCAC 2B.0203); suitable for all Class C uses;
Class B: primary recreation and any other usage specified by the "C" classification;
Class C: aquatic life propagation and survival, fishing, wildlife, secondary
recreation, and agriculture.
All waters within Burgaw and its ETJ are classified by the DWQ as Class C. There are
'
no anadromous fish spawning areas that have been designated within Burgaw's planning
jurisdiction. An anadromous fish migrates up river from the sea to breed in fresh water.
'
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-70 1 1
11

1
SECTION II: PROJECTED LAND DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS
A. PROJECTED DEMAND FOR DEVELOPMENT
1. Permanent Population
a. Regional and County
Fourteen of the twenty North Carolina counties affected by the Coastal Area Management
Act (CAMA) are expected to experience a net permanent population growth from 1996
to 2010. As Table 27 indicates, the five counties expected to experience negative
population growth are Bertie, Camden, Hertford, Hyde, and Washington. Tyrrell
County's population may be expected to fluctuate up and down during the fourteen year
period but actually experience no net gain or loss.
Table 27
' Total Population and Percent Change for
CAMA Counties and State, 1996-2010
% Change
County
1996
2000
2005
2010
'96-10
Beaufort
43,210
44,280
44,760
45,175
4.5 %
Bertie
20,532
20,154
19,687
19,590
4.6 %
Brunswick
62,856
66,497
73,285
79,644
26.7%
Camden
6,356
6,202
6,244
6,303
-0.1 %
Carteret
58,341
64,209
69,543
74,280
27.3%
'
Chowan
14,152
14,666
14,940
15,283
8.0 %
Craven
87,174
93,955
100,237
105,252
20.7 %
Currituck
16,372
16,867
18,206
19,621
19.8 %
Dare
26,542
31,491
36,479
41,495
56.3%
Gates
9,864
10,094
10,381
10,740
8.8 %
Hertford
22,214
22,190
21,927
21,709
-2.3 %
Hyde
5,191
5,151
5,017
4,837
-6.8 %
New Hanover
143,430
139,332
145,147
150,936
5.2%
'
Onslow
150,216
169,659
185,627
198,617
32.2%
Pamlico
12,010
12,354
12,675
13,003
8.3 %
Pasquotank
33,848
34,560
35,948
37,411
10.5%
Pender
35,978
36,374
39,448
42,331
17.7%
Perquimans
10,756
11,226
11,587
12,005
11.6 %
Tyrrell
Washington
3,671
13,504
3,805
13,473
3,713
13,010
3,671
12,518
0.0%
-7.3 %
Total CAMA Counties
776,217
816,539
868,041
914,421
17.8%
'
State of North Carolina
7,323,085
7,444,961
7,762,906
8,070,539
10.2%
Source: Office of State Planning.
Section II: Projected Land Development Analysis II-1 1

In the year 2010, Pender County may be expected to be the seventh largest CAMA
county. In addition, Pender County's population is expected to grow at a rate faster than
all but six of the CAMA counties. Table 27 also indicates that during the fourteen year
period, the total CAMA counties are expected to grow at a rate (17.8%) faster than that
of the state as a whole (10.2%).
Table 28 provides a summary of population characteristics that have been forecast by the
Office of State Planning for Pender County. This county -wide data has been provided
because forecasts of Burgaw's population characteristics are not available.
Table 28
Pender County
Summary of Population Characteristics Forecasts, 2000-2010
Age Group
2000
2005
2010
% Change
100-110
0-4
2,432
2,497
2,587
6.4%
5-17
6,404
6,705
7,191
12.3 %
18-24
2,671
3,128
3,259
22.0%
25-34
4,614
4,557
4,770
3.4%
35-44
5,312
5,495
5,424
2.1%
45-54
5,141
5,638
5,999
16.7%
55-59
2,169
2,790
2,874
32.5 %
60-64
1,994
2,355
2,903
45.6%
65+
5,637
6,283
7,324
30.0%
Total
36,374
39,448
42,331
16.4%
Median Age
39.0
40.2
41.5
6.4%
% Change
Race and Sex
2000
2005
2010
'00-10
White Male
13,329
14,858
16,197
21.5%
White Female
13,655
15,179
16,703
22.3 %
Subtotal
26,984
30,037
32,900
21.9%
Other Male
4,270
4,253
4,235
-0.8%
Other Female
5,120
5,158
5,196
1.5 %
Subtotal
9 190
9 41 1
9 411
0 4%
Total
36,374
39,448
42,331
16.4%
Source: Office of State Planning.
As Table 28 indicates, Pender County's median age may be expected to increase from
39.0 to 41.5 between the years 2000-2010. In addition, in the year 2010, the age groups
5-17 and 65+ may be expected to comprise the largest portion of the county's total
population occupying 17.0 % and 17.3 %, respectively. The county's population will
continue to be dominated by individuals of the white race due to the fact that all other
races combined may be expected to increase by only 0.4 % during the ten year period.
Section II: Projected Land Development Analysis II-2 1

In conformance with the Coastal Area Management Act planning guidelines, population
projections for the municipalities within Pender County have been prepared through 2010.
' However, the reader is cautioned that the CAMA five-year planning period extends
through 2002. The population projections are provided in Figure 3. It is emphasized that
the municipal forecasts do not take into consideration annexations which may occur. As
' a result, the population of some municipalities may prove to be above the figures which
are forecast.
The overall county population is expected to increase from 35,978 in 1996 to 42,331 in
2010. This increase of 17.7 % (an annual average of 1.3 %) was applied to all
municipalities within the county.
' Figure 3 provides an indicator of anticipated municipal growth within Pender County. In
the year 2010, approximately 15.7 % of Pender County's total population is expected to
reside within the corporate limits of the county's municipalities.
b. Town of Burgaw
Figure 3 indicates that Burgaw's population may reach 4,140 persons by the year 2010.
This amounts to a net increase of 621 persons above the town's 1996 population. *
Burgaw will remain, by far, the largest municipality in Pender County. In fact, the
population in Burgaw comprises approximately 62 % of the county's total municipal
population. However, it should be noted that the population forecasts do not take into
account the possibility of annexations which could result in population increase. It is
expected that during the planning period, some annexations will occur. Potential
annexations will be discussed further in Part B of this section entitled Projected Public
Facilities Needs/Availability.
Unfortunately, the detailed projections for Pender County cannot be utilized to derive
detailed, tabular age, race, and sex projections for Burgaw because the town's
demographic characteristics are generally atypical of Pender County as a whole. For
example, in 1990, the median age for the Town of Burgaw and the percentage of African
Americans were slightly higher than those of the county as a whole. However, some
general assumptions about Burgaw's population composition can be made.
' Throughout the planning period, Burgaw's statistical population will continue to age, with
the percentage of individuals aged 65 and over comprising an increasingly larger
' percentage of the total population. The white population is expected to grow significantly
faster than the non -white population. These assumptions are based on recent historical
trends for the Town of Burgaw, as well as the projections by age, race, and sex for Pender
County provided by the State Data Center.
*It should be noted that there are two large subdivisions (Teal Briar and what is locally
known as Buccaneer Country Club Subdivision) planned which the town expects to fully
develop prior to the year 2010. These subdivisions combined may include approximately
513 additional dwelling units. These dwelling units would be capable of housing over
1,000 new residents. Given this additional opportunity for growth, it is conceivable that
the forecast provided for the year 2010 may prove to be quite conservative.
Section II: Projected Land Development Analysis II-3 1

FIGURE 3
Pender County
Forecasted Year -Round Population Growth, 1996-2010
Year -Round
Population
Municipality
1996
2000
2005
2010
Atkinson
301
304
330
354
Burgaw
3,519
3,558
3,858
4,140*
St. Helena
353
357
387
415
Sloop Point
21
21
23
25
Surf City (part)
809
818
887
952
Topsail Beach
434
439
476
511
Wallace (part)
32
32
35
38
Watha
171
173
187
201
Total Municipalities
5,640
5,702
6,184
6,636
Total Unincorporated Areas
30,338
30,672
33,264
35,695
Total County
35,978
36,374
39,448
42,331
❑ 1996
■ 2010
® 2000 2005
4,250
4,000
3,750
3,500
3,250
3,000
2,750
g
2,500
a
2,250
2,000
0
1,750
°-
1,500
1,250
1,000
750
500
250
0
v�i
c
p� aci
O U
a 'tm
a tvo N
ma
m =
C
��
>
Q
r+
O
Municipality
*See note on previous page.
Source: North Carolina Office of State Planning; extrapolation of data for
unincorporated areas by Holland Consulting Planners, Inc.
Section II: Projected Land Development Analysis II-4 1

fl
' 2. Housing Trends
' According to county -wide projections, Pender County may be expected to have year 2000 and
2005 average persons per household (APPH) of 2.42 and 2.35, respectively. Assuming the Town
of Burgaw's APPH will remain approximately 8.3 % below that of Pender County's (as was the
case in 1990), the town may expect an APPH of 2.23 in 2000 and 2.16 in 2005.
Based on the APPH and population projections for the town, there will be a demand for
approximately 17 additional housing units by the year 2000 and an additional 140 by the year 2005
in Burgaw.
Another means by which to project the rate of residential construction is through the application
of documented building permit issuance rates. For example, between 1990-1997, there were 96
permits issued for conventional single-family construction and 67 permits issued for mobile home
placement, resulting in annual permit issuance rates of 14 and 10, respectively. Through the
application of these average annual building permit issuance rates, approximately 28 single-family
homes and 20 mobile homes may be constructed or placed by the year 2000 and an additional 70
single-family homes and 50 mobile homes may be constructed or placed by 2005. This results in
a total of 48 new housing units by 2000 and 120 by the year 2005.
' The reader should be cautioned that the two projection methods previously discussed provide
slightly different results. However, through the combination of these methods, it may be assumed
that between 1748 new housing units may be constructed by the year 2000 and an additional 120-
140 may be constructed by the year 2005.
It is anticipated that Burgaw's most serious housing problem during the planning period may be
maintaining a supply of standard, affordable rental housing. The anticipated shortage of rental
housing will impact the low income community, including elderly households on fixed incomes,
and younger working households who relocate to Burgaw to be closer to manufacturing jobs along
the I40 corridor. Additionally, some of these younger working households will wish to purchase
new, affordable housing units, also a commodity in short supply in Burgaw.
The Town of Burgaw has recognized the need to increase its supply of affordable housing as well
' as improve the condition of its existing housing. As discussed in Section I of this plan, in 1996,
approximately 12.8 % of the town's total housing stock was considered substandard based on HUD
Section 8 guidelines. However, the town has received two grant awards to help address the
remaining housing condition deficiencies in town. These grant awards include $200,000 (1997)
through the North Carolina Housing Finance Agency and $396,150 (1998) through the Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. These projects will provide for the redevelopment
' of a combined 19 dwelling units during the next 2 years, and will significantly improve overall
housing conditions in Burgaw.
' The conversion of retail space downtown for residential use is a trend which may be expected to
emerge in Burgaw during the planning period. In many communities this type of land use
conversion has helped to regenerate interest in the downtown area and has provided a much needed
stimulant for retail activity.
Section II: Projected Land Development Analysis II-5 ,

3. Public Land Use
The following public land use changes may occur during the planning period:
-- Additional expansion of the wastewater treatment plant including land acquisition.
Acquisition of property to be utilized for a new park and recreation site.
-- Acquisition of property for cemetery expansion.
-- Although not a town project, the Pender County Jail is expected to undergo expansion.
Although there have been some discussions over the possibility of the town acquiring the
Buccaneer golf course for a municipal facility, this is not likely to occur.
The addition to the Pender County Jail, located on North Walker Street, will take place on land
already acquired for public use. Although expansion of the jail is not really a town issue, this
expansion will take place within the town and will have an effect on the provision of law
enforcement capabilities county -wide. Therefore, this project is indirectly relevant to Burgaw and
has been identified in the preceding list.
4. Commercial Land Use
Major changes in Burgaw's commercial land use are not expected during the planning period.
According to data provided by the Pender County Tax Department, eight commercial businesses
were established in Burgaw between 1993-1996. This amounts to approximately three new
commercial establishments per year.
It is expected that the commercial development that takes place during the planning period will be
located in the town's central business district (CBD) and along the U.S. 117 and N.C. 53
corridors.
The main commercial land use issues continue to be:
-- Preservation of the Burgaw central business district for both economic and historical/
architectural reasons.
-- Control of strip development along U.S. 117.
-- Control of commercial development along N.C. 53 between Burgaw and I-40.
-- Reduction of transient commercial truck traffic through the Burgaw central business
district.
Commercial growth should occur gradually. As development occurs, the town should strive to
minimize adverse impacts of commercial development on adjacent residential properties. In
addition, the town should control the location and number of curb cuts or highway entrances
through stringent enforcement of the town's zoning and subdivision ordinances.
Section II: Projected Land Development Analysis II-6 1
Ll
'I

L�
As discussed previously in this text, a need has been identified to consider the expansion of the
town's current commercial zoning districts to include a highway commercial district. In the event
' a highway commercial district is established, areas zoned for highway commercial uses would
then serve as the primary locations for new commercial development. Provision of such a district
could act to limit curb cuts, prevent continuous strip development, and protect existing residential
' areas from infringement. The existing Burgaw zoning ordinance provides for a central business
district and a neighborhood business district. The intent of these districts is defined as follows:
Central Business District (B-1): The regulations for this district are designed to permit a
concentrated development of permitted facilities within the central portion of Burgaw with
emphasis upon large scale stores and specialized shops serving a retail trading area. No B-1
1 district shall be less than four (4) acres in area.
Neighborhood Business District (B-2): The Neighborhood Business District is established as a
' district in which the principal use of land is to provide for the retailing of goods and services to
the adjacent residential neighborhoods. The regulations of this district are intended to provide for
retail trades and services in designed shopping areas, where the nature of the development
occurring is limited by standards designed to protect the abutting residential areas. No B-2 district
shall be less than four (4) acres in area.
' 5. Industrial Land Use
The Burgaw zoning ordinance provides for the following industrial districts:
Light Industrial District (I-1): This district is defined as an area in which manufacturing
establishments that produce commodities with a minimum of noise, gaseous emissions and other
objectionable external effects customarily associated with an industrial process may be developed.
The array of permitted uses is limited to the environmentally protective nature of this district. No
I-1 district will be less than four (4) acres in area.
' Heavy Industrial District (I-2): This district is defined as an area where most manufacturing
establishments may be developed. This district is customarily located in proximity to railroad
sidings and/or major thoroughfares. The purpose of this district is to permit the normal operations
' of almost all industries except those that would be detrimental to adjoining properties. Excluded
from this district are those industries which are noxious by reason of the emission of smoke, dust,
glare, noise, and vibrations and those industries which deal primarily in hazardous products such
as explosives. No I-2 district shall be less than five (5) acres in area.
The Town of Burgaw has very little property zoned for light industrial use. In fact, the only
' property zoned I-1 is located on N.C. 53 west of town and is considerably small in size. Although
it is certainly acceptable for light industry to locate in a Heavy Industrial District (I-2), the
rezoning of additional property to I-1 would provide more opportunities for industrial growth.
' It is very likely that there are areas in town that would not accommodate I-2 development but
might be suitable for I-1 development.
11
Section II: Projected Land Development Analysis II-7 1

In order to accommodate industrial growth in Burgaw's planning jurisdiction, it may become
necessary to re -zone additional property I-1. This issue should be addressed when the town
initiates the next revision to its zoning ordinance.
Other than the shortage of property zoned for light industrial uses, there are no anticipated
problems or significant issues facing industrial development during the next ten years. Industrial
development is expected to locate either in the Burgaw Industrial Park or the Stag Industrial Park
area.
6. Transportation
During the planning period, there are no significant changes in transportation land uses expected.
Minor changes including right-of-way acquisition and, in some areas, the extension of paved
streets may be required to serve developing areas as anticipated. However, at some point beyond
the next five years, the State of North Carolina may initiate right-of-way acquisition for the
construction of the N.C. 53 Burgaw bypass. In this event, the amount of land dedicated for
transportation use will increase significantly. The proposed location of this bypass is provided in
Part B of this section.
Traffic congestion in the town may be expected to increase and the conflict between local traffic
and transient traffic will intensify until a bypass is constructed. The town will continue to utilize
Powell Bill funds to assist in the maintenance of the town's roads.
7. Annexation
The Town of Burgaw has identified the following areas that have the potential for annexation:
-- Stag Park industrial area.
-- Portions of N.C. 53 where there is existing water/sewer service.
-- Cottles Acres subdivision
-- An area on N.C. 53 west near Four County Electric.
Although these areas have been identified, no formal plans or studies for their annexation have
been conducted. It is recommended that the Town of Burgaw pursue the completion of a
comprehensive annexation plan which identifies areas that meet the state's criteria for annexation
and provides a prioritization of areas for annexation. As a result of annexation, it is likely that
the population forecasts provided in this plan will prove to be low. However, it is not possible
to anticipate annexation actions and the resulting impact on population.
As Burgaw extends its corporate limits, the town may also pursue the extension of its
extraterritorial area. It is anticipated that if the town does choose to extend its ETJ, it will be
primarily to the west and may include the I-40 interchange.
Section II: Projected Land Development Analysis H-8 '

8. Summar
The greatest obstacles to growth within Burgaw's planning jurisdiction will continue to be the lack
of central sewer within the ETJ, the abundance of soils unsuitable for septic tanks usage, and the
difficulty of obtaining building permits in 404 wetland areas. These obstacles, with the exception
of the extension of sewer line into some areas, will not change significantly during the planning
period. In most cases, the extension of sewer lines will be the responsibility of developers. The
areas where the town intends to extend sewer service are discussed in Part B of this section.
The Town of Burgaw will support development which may result in some net loss of wetlands as
allowed through the 404 permit process. Residential, commercial, and industrial development will
be allowed which is consistent with the town's zoning ordinance. The following list summarizes
the planning issues that will face the Town of Burgaw during the planning period.
-- Development of affordable housing, including rental housing.
-- Improving the overall condition of the town's housing stock.
-- Expansion of the town's wastewater treatment plant.
-- Land acquisition for parks/recreation and cemetery expansion.
-- Control of development along the N.C. 53 and U.S. 117 highway corridors.
-- Preservation of the Burgaw central business district (CBD).
-- Reduction of transient commercial truck traffic through the Burgaw CBD.
-- Review of the town's zoning ordinance to include a highway commercial district and
additional property zoned for light industrial (I-1) uses.
-- Annexation of developing areas.
-- Implementation of long range thoroughfare planning.
I
B. PROJECTED PUBLIC FACILITIES NEEDS/AVAILABILITY
I
As discussed in Section I of this plan, as part of this land use plan update process, a town -wide meeting
was conducted to identify the most significant issues currently facing the Town of Burgaw. At this
meeting, the citizens of Burgaw identified stormwater drainage as the single most important issue facing
the town (the complete ranking of land use issues identified at the town -wide meeting is provided on page
I-36 of this plan). In response to this issue, the Town of Burgaw has initiated the preparation of a
stormwater management study. This study has a total project cost of $40,000, of which 50% will be
provided by the Army Corps of Engineers, 25%by the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, and the remaining 25 % by the Town of Burgaw. This study is intended to identify the specific
areas most susceptible to flooding in the town and to provide a model stormwater management ordinance.
Based on the findings of this study, it is recommended that the town consider preparation of a
comprehensive drainage master plan including a schedule for routine and remedial maintenance of drainage
ditches. The town will continue to allocate funds on an annual basis for stormwater maintenance projects.
Once the town adopts its own stormwater management ordinance, significant future drainage and flooding
problems may be prevented.
In addition to drainage concerns, the conflict between local traffic and transient traffic through Burgaw
has been discussed throughout this plan. The construction of a N.C. 53 bypass around Burgaw has been
identified in the N.C. Department of Transportation's 1997 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) as
project R-3302. The feasibility study for this project was completed in 1995. Project planning and
Section II: Projected Land Development Analysis II-9 '
Ll

environmental studies are currently underway and are expected to be completed in 2000. Right-of-way '
acquisition is currently scheduled for federal fiscal year 2003 and construction is scheduled to take place
following federal fiscal year 2004. As a result, implementation of this project will not take place prior '
to the town's next land use plan update (5 years) but may become a reality during the 10-year planning
period. The construction of such a bypass would significantly reduce problems with associated transient
traffic in town. Map 8 provides the approximate location of the proposed N.C. 53 bypass as provided by '
the NCDOT.
There are no associated problems anticipated relevant to the provision of central sewer service considering '
the recent improvements which have expanded wastewater treatment capacity to 750,000 gallons per day.
The town will continue with its maintenance plans including line and man -hole replacement to mitigate
inflow problems.
The town may pursue the acquisition of potential sites for wastewater treatment facility expansion,
parks/recreation facilities, and additional cemetery space during the planning period. In addition, the town '
may pursue expansion of the town garage and may refurbish the Cowan Building to house the Planning
and Inspections Department.
All public facilities and services including solid waste disposal, water supply, police, fire, rescue, '
administration, transportation, electrical distribution, telephone service, cable television, schools, and
health services are expected to remain adequate to meet population demand during the planning period. ,
A deficiency in the town's recreational facilities has been discussed in this plan and will likely be
addressed by the town during the planning period.
Section II: Projected Land Development Analysis II-10 1 1

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
C
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
NC 53
r
1-01
%'
NCDOT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECT R-3302
i
i
5
�Q .
`w J�' •
G '
' SR �33 � • / .
OR. -le
— •— •— •— •— -- City Limit Line (Approximate Location)
MAP 8
�S
• \ The preparation of this map was financed in part
\ through a grant provided by the North Carolina
Coastal Management Program, through funds provided
• \ / by the Coastal Zone Management Ad of 1972, as
�. amended, which is administered by the Office of
• Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
• • - - • . • • . • • ETJ Line (Approximate Location)

IC. REDEVELOPMENT ISSUES
I
I
The two main redevelopment issues facing Burgaw include the elimination of substandard housing and the
preservation of the town's central business district. As previously discussed, the town has recently been
awarded grant funds totaling $596,150 for the rehabilitation of 19 dwelling units in town. The
implementation of these projects will significantly decrease the concentration of substandard housing in
Burgaw. Following completion of these rehabilitation activities, the town will continue to actively pursue
available grant funds to address any remaining housing deficiencies.
The second redevelopment issue is the preservation of the Burgaw central business district.
Preservation/rehabilitation of the existing structures is critical to the continuation of Burgaw's attractive
appearance and "small town" atmosphere. The following should be undertaken to aid in preservation of
the central business district:
-- Investigate the feasibility/desirability of having the central business district designated as
an historic district.
-- Review the town's zoning ordinance to determine what, if any, changes should be made
to support utilization of central business district properties.
-- Consider participation in the North Carolina Main Street program.
-- Consider development of an annual cultural/festival event designed to draw attention to
the Burgaw central business district.
Although not anticipated, redevelopment of areas following a hurricane or other natural disaster should
also be a concern during the planning period. The specifics of such redevelopment are dealt with in the
storm hazard mitigation and post disaster reconstruction plan. However, the Town of Burgaw will support
the reconstruction of any properties destroyed by natural disaster.
D. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION AND IMPLEMENTATION
This plan was reviewed by the Pender County Planning Department prior to certification by the Coastal
Resources Commission. This review was provided to help ensure consistency of this plan with Pender
County's planning efforts. Intergovernmental coordination and cooperation will continue through the ten-
year planning period. This will be essential to accomplish effective planning for public utilities,
thoroughfare projects, community facilities, housing needs, and environmental protection. The Burgaw
Board of Commissioners will be responsible for ensuring adequate coordination with Pender County and
other government entities as may be required.
Section II: Projected Land Development Analysis II-12 1

SECTION III: LAND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
Development of a land classification system provides a means of assisting in the implementation of
Burgaw's policies by delineating land classes on a map. The land classification system should be
supported by and consistent with Burgaw's zoning, subdivision, and other adopted growth management
tools. The CAMA 15A NCAC 7B regulations state:
"The land classification system provides a framework to be used by local government to identify
the future use of all lands. The designation of land classes allows the local government to
illustrate their policy statements as to where and to what density they want growth to occur and
where they want to conserve natural and cultural resources by guiding growth."
The 15A NCAC 7B requirements provide for the following classifications: developed, urban transition,
limited transition, community, rural, rural with services, and conservation. In applying these
classifications, Burgaw should carefully consider when and where various types of development should
be encouraged. Additionally, environmentally sensitive areas should be recognized by the land
classification system. There are no state -identified areas of environmental concern (15A NCAC 7H)
located within Burgaw. However, the 100-year floodplain, historical properties, and open space are
classified as conservation areas. Each applicable land classification must be represented on a land
classification map.
The following land classifications, which are delineated on Map 9, will apply in Burgaw's planning
jurisdiction:
Developed areas included in the developed land classification are currently urban in character,
with no or minimal undeveloped land remaining. Municipal types of services, with the exception
of central water and sewer service, are in place or are expected to be provided within the next five
to ten years. Land uses include residential, commercial, public/semi-public, and other urban land
uses at the following densities which are prescribed by 15A NCAC 713:
• 500 dwelling units per square mile, or
• three dwelling units per acre, or
• where a majority of lots are 15,000 square feet or less.
In Burgaw, the developed classification is subdivided into the following subclassifications:
• Developed Residential (DR) - These are areas where electrical, police, fire, sanitation,
recreation, and other municipal services are provided. The major land use is residential
development. In 1993, all developed residential property was located within the Burgaw
corporate limits. The maximum height for residential structures is 35 feet. Specific
densities in the various areas of the town's planning jurisdiction shall be dictated by the
Burgaw zoning ordinance. Minimum lot sizes range from 5,000-20,000 square feet within
the town's planning jurisdiction depending on the density specified in the town's zoning
.r ordinance.
Section III: Land Classification System
r

NOTE: IN ADDITION TO THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, THE
CONSERVATION CATEGORY ALSO INCLUDES THE ABANDONED
ATLANTIC COASTLINE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, FENDER
COUNTY COURTHOUSE SQUARE, AND THE BURGAW RAILROAD
DEPOT. HOWEVER, DUE TO MAP SCALE, THESE ADDITIONAL
CONSERVATION AREAS HAVE NOT BEEN MAPPED. THIS MAP
PROVIDES THE APPROXIMATE 100-YEAR FLOOD HAZARD
AREAS AS PROVIDED BY THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY
MANAGEMENT AGENCY'S (FEMA) PRELIMINARY FLOOD �\
INSURANCE RATE MAPS (FIRMS) FOR BURGAW. PRECISE
DETERMINATIONS OF FLOOD HAZARD AREAS SHOULD NOT BE
MADE FROM THIS MAP.
n`z°p
f
Yh ti�l !� ag
Legend
=Developed Residential,:
=Limited Transition
®Developed Commercial
j ®Developed Industrial
Urban Transition N ..
Conservation (1 oo-vear floodpiain, �
— —City Limit Line see note above)
- - - ETJ Line
r
The preparation of this map was financed in part MAP 9
through a grant provided by the North Carolina
Coastal Management Program, through funds provided B u rg aw Planning Area
by the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as
amended, which is administered by the Office of
Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Land Classification M a p
Oceanic and Atmosphenc Administration.
t
Approximate Scale in Miles!,
0 .36 .70 III-2 '

Appendix II describes the zoning districts which are included in the Burgaw Zoning
Ordinance and provides the zoning ordinance table of permitted uses.
The Developed Residential classification may include the following zoning districts: R-12
Residential, R-12CU Residential Conditional Use, R-5CU Multi -Family Conditional Use,
R-5MH Residential Mobile, R-5MHCU Residential Mobile Conditional, PUD Planned
Unit Development, and PUDCU Planned Unit Development Conditional Use.
• Developed Commercial (DC) - These are areas where police, fire, sanitation, recreation,
and other municipal services are provided. The developed commercial category is
primarily located within the Central Business District and along U.S. 117. The majority
of the developed commercial category was developed in 1998. The town desires to
carefully control its commercial zoning in order to preserve the town's small town
atmosphere.
�( The Developed Commercial classification may include the following zoning districts: O-I
Office and Institutional, O-ICU Office and Institutional Conditional Use, B-1 Central
Business District, B-ICU Central Business Conditional Use, B-2 Neighborhood Business,
and B-2CU Neighborhood Business Conditional Use.
• Developed Industrial (DI) - These areas are provided town water and sewer services.
Within the corporate limits, the full range of other municipal services are provided. This
category includes both heavy and light industrial zoning. Almost all of the town's
developed industrial property is located within industrial parks.
are n in' lot sizes for industrial) zonedproperty. The maximum building There o minimum zes y g
height for I-1 light industrial property is 35 feet and 56 feet for I-2 heavy industrial
property. In 1998, almost all industrial property in Burgaw was zoned I-2.
The DI classification includes the following zoning districts: I-1 Light Industrial District,
I-lCU Light Industrial Conditional Use, I-2 Heavy Industrial, I-2CU Heavy Industrial
Conditional Use.
• Urban Transition (UT) - Areas included in the urban transition classification are presently
being developed for urban purposes, or will be developed in the next five to ten years.
These areas will eventually require complete urban services. The urban transition areas
include mixed land uses such as residential (single-family and multi -family), commercial,
institutional, industrial, industrial parks, transportation, and other uses approaching high
to moderate densities. Specific uses will be governed by the Town of Burgaw zoning
ordinance. The majority of the UT Classification is zoned RA-20 Residential -Agricultural
and RA-20CU Residential -Agricultural Conditional use. However, any of the zoning
districts may be located within the UT classification.
The urban transition category is primarily found within the town's extraterritorial
jurisdiction along all major roads leading into town.
Section III: Land Classification System III-3 '

Limited Transition (LT) - Areas included in the limited transition classification are areas
which will experience increasing development during the next five to ten years. Some
municipal type services will be required. The limited transition classification is intended
for predominantly residential uses. However, some scattered commercial, health care, and
industrial development may occur. Clustering or development associated with planned
unit developments may be appropriate. Rezonings may occur during the planning period
which may result in scattered non-residential uses. In 1998, all limited transition areas
were zoned RA-20, Residential -Agricultural.
Conservation (CON) - The purpose of the Conservation class is to provide for the effective
long-term management and protection of significant, limited, or irreplaceable areas.
Management is needed due to the natural, cultural, recreational, scenic or natural
productive values of both local and more than local concern. The Conservation class is
designed to illustrate the natural, productive, scenic, cultural, and recreational features of
the coastal zone which make the region a desirable place in which to live, work, and visit.
As such, the Conservation Class should be applied to areas that because of their unique,
productive, limited, cultural, or natural features should be either not developed at all
(preserved), or if developed, done so in an extremely limited and cautious fashion. The
following environmentally sensitive areas are included in the conservation classification:
100-Year Floodplain: This category includes the waters of all streams and areas
susceptible to flooding. These areas are located primarily along Burgaw Creek
and its tributaries and are delineated on Maps 6 and 9. Only those uses consistent
with the policies contained in this plan and the Town of Burgaw zoning ordinance
will be allowed. It is the town's intent to allow development in the floodplain in
an extremely limited and cautious fashion.
Historic Properties: This category includes the Pender County Courthouse Square "
and the Burgaw Depot.
Open Space: This category includes the abandoned Seaboard Coastline Railroad
right-of-way. No development will be allowed in the category. This must be
enforced through the Town of Burgaw zoning ordinance.
There are no districts included in the Burgaw zoning ordinance which specifically address
historic properties and open space.
I
1
Section III: Land Classification System I1I-4 1 1

I SECTION IV: POLICY STATEMENTS
A. INTRODUCTION TO POLICY STATEMENTS
Policy Statements have a day-to-day impact on individual citizens within Burgaw's planning jurisdiction.
The statements will have an impact in two important areas:
Establishment of local planning policy.
— Review of proposed projects requiring state or federal assistance or approval to determine
consistency with local polices.
in There are no areas of environmental concern as defined by 15A NCAC 7H located in Burgaw's planning
jurisdiction. CAMA minor and major permitting as required by NCGS 113A-118 does not apply to the
town. All policies stated in this plan must be supported by local ordinances and actions in order to ensure
implementation. The policies contained in this plan will have to be primarily implemented by the Town
of Burgaw. In the absence of AECs, the town cannot rely on CAMA permit personnel to enforce the land
use plan policies. Thus, a greater burden is placed on Burgaw town officials to ensure implementation of
its land use plan.
With respect to "Consistency Review," proposals and applications for state and federal assistance or
requests for agency approval of projects are normally reviewed against a jurisdiction's land use plan to
determine if the project is consistent with local policies. Inconsistencies with local policies could serve
as grounds for denial or revision of a project. For example, an individual or agency may request state or
federal funding to construct a 30-unit low -to -moderate income housing project. If the proposed location
of the project is within an area in which the land use plan states that the residential density should not
exceed two dwelling units per acre, the project may be judged to be inconsistent with the local land use
plan.
15A NCAC 7B requires all governments to specify stated development policies under each one of five
broad topics. These topics include:
— Resource Protection
Resource Production and Management
— Economic and Community Development
— Continuing Public Participation
1 — Storm Hazard Mitigation, Post -Disaster Recovery, and Evacuation Plans
The policies outlined in the following section will provide a guide for advising and regulating development
of available land resources in Burgaw through 2003. At that time, an updated CAMA land use plan will
be prepared. Policies which were considered, but not adopted, are provided in Appendix III.
B. VISION STATEMENT
Burgaw is a community of concerned people who have created a healthy, safe, and secure place for people
of diverse backgrounds. The community's diverse and growing economy and population combine a strong
work ethic with its agricultural assets and technical capabilities. Burgaw's historical heritage and its
Section IV: Policy Statements IV-1 1

cultural opportunities enrich the lives of its residents and attract visitors and new residents. The town has
a responsive public sector which supports environmental responsibility and economic growth. Burgaw will
continue to emphasize preservation of its residential areas. Specifically, Burgaw will strive to accomplish
the following:
— Preserve its Central Business District.
-- Preserve its agricultural base.
-- Create and protect amenities including parks and open spaces.
-- Promote commercial/industrial development which is compatible with surrounding land
uses.
-- Provide the highest level of service, while maintaining a low tax rate.
-- Enact pro -active land use practices which will enhance the community and improve the
quality of life.
C. RESOURCE PROTECTION POLICIES*
Communitv Attitude Toward Resource Protection
Burgaw will focus its resource protection efforts on regulation of its floodplain areas, protection of its
historic properties, and protection of the abandoned Seaboard Coastline Railroad right-of-way. There are
no 15A NCAC 7H defined areas of environmental concern located within Burgaw's planning jurisdiction.
The following concerns should be addressed by Burgaw's resource protection policies:
— Elimination of stormwater drainage problems.
— Protection of surface water quality.
— Solid waste disposal.
— Preservation of historic properties.
— Industrial growth/development impacts on resources.
Physical Limitations
Soils (issue discussed page I-60)
Policy (a): Burgaw will enforce all current regulations of the N.C. State Building Code and the
Pender County Health Department relating to building, construction, and septic tank
installation/replacement in areas with soil restrictions.
Policy (b): Burgaw will continue to stress appropriate development and development in areas with
suitable soils through enforcement of the town's zoning ordinance.
Implementation: The town will rely on its zoning ordinance, zoning permit process, and
building inspections to enforce policies (a) and (b). In addition, the town will coordinate
all development activity with appropriate state and county personnel.
Schedule: Continuing activity.
*A policy addressing the protection of wetlands identified as of the highest functional significance has not been
provided because the data required is not yet available from the Division of Coastal Management.
Section IV: Policy Statements IV-2 '
H

IPolicy (c):
1
1
1
The town will cooperate with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in the
regulation/enforcement of the 404 wetlands permit process.
Implementation: Burgaw will rely on the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to regulate the
development of 404 wetland areas.
Schedule: Continuing Activity
Flood Hazard Areas (issue discussed page I-60)
Policy: Burgaw desires to minimize the hazards to life, health, public safety, and personal
property by allowing development within its flood hazard areas only on an extremely
limited and cautious basis.
Implementation (a): Burgaw will continue to coordinate all development within the 100-
year floodplain with the town's Inspections Department, FEMA, the U.S. Corps of
Engineers, and Pender County.
Schedule: Continuing activity.
Implementation (b): Burgaw will rely on its zoning and subdivision ordinances to
implement this policy.
Schedule: Continuing activity.
Implementation (c): To enforce the town's flood damage prevention ordinance within its
planning jurisdiction and to control development within flood hazard areas, Burgaw will
create a floodplain district in its zoning ordinance when the town's FIRM maps are
finalized by FEMA.
Schedule: FY1998-1999
Groundwater/Protection of Potable Water Supplies (issue discussed page I-59)
Policy (a): Burgaw desires to conserve its surficial' groundwater resources.
Implementation: Burgaw will conserve its surficial groundwater resources by enforcing
CAMA and N.C. Division of Water Quality stormwater runoff regulations, and by
coordinating local development activities involving chemical storage or underground
storage tanks with the North Carolina Division of Water Quality.
Schedule: Continuing activity.
Policy (b): Burgaw will carefully weigh the potential benefit to the community versus the potential
detriment from industrial development locating in areas particularly susceptible to
groundwater contamination (hydric soil areas).
'Groundwaters which are at or just below the surface.
Section IV: Policy Statements IV-3

Implementation: The town will rely on its zoning ordinance to implement this policy. I
Schedule: Continuing activity.
Policy (c): Burgaw supports the regulations of land uses near the town's water supply.
Implementation (a): Burgaw will support enforcement of the Division of Water Quality
and enforcement of 15A NCAC Subchapters 2L and 2C.
Schedule: Continuing activity.
Implementation (b): Burgaw will rely on its zoning ordinance to regulate land use in the
vicinity of its water supply wells.
Schedule: Continuing activity.
Manmade Hazards (issue discussed I-65)
Policy (a): Burgaw opposes the temporary or permanent storage or disposal of any toxic wastes, as
defined by the Environmental Protection Agency, within its planning jurisdiction.
Policy (b): Burgaw supports the development of Tier II reporting businesses within its jurisdiction in
areas which do not present a hazard to adjacent land uses, especially land uses such as
schools, hospitals, and residential areas.
Implementation: Burgaw will revise its zoning ordinance to incorporate provisions to `
implement manmade hazards policies (a) and (b).
Schedule: Revise zoning ordinance FY 1999-2000.
Policy (c): Burgaw supports regulation of underground storage tanks in order to protect its
groundwater resources.
Implementation: The town will rely on the technical requirements and state program
approval for underground storage tanks (40 CFR, parts 280 and 281), and any subsequent
state regulations concerning underground storage tanks adopted during the planning
period.
Schedule: Continuing activity.
Policy (d): Burgaw opposes the transport of hazardous materials by transient traffic through medium
and high density residential areas and the central business district.
Implementation: Burgaw will lobby to have construction of the N.C. 53 bypass moved to
a higher priority on the North Carolina Department of Transportation TIP.
Schedule: FY2000-2001. I
Section IV: Policy Statements IV-4 I I

Policy (e): Because industry can present hazards to other forms of development, only similar land
uses will be encouraged around industrial uses, industrial parks, and sandpits. Residential
development will be limited near fuel storage tanks.
Implementation: The town will rely on its zoning ordinance to enforce this policy.
Schedule: Continuing activity.
Stormwater Runoff (issue discussed Page I48 and I-50)
Policy (a): Burgaw recognizes the value of water quality maintenance to the protection of fragile areas
and to the provision of clean water for recreational purposes. The town will support state
regulation relating to stormwater runoff resulting from development (Stormwater Disposal
Policy 15A NCAC 2H.001-.1003).
Implementation: The town will develop a master drainage plan and storm water control
ordinance.
Schedule: FY1998-2001.
Cultural/Historic Resources (issue discussed Page I-68 and I-69)
Policy: The Town of Burgaw supports protection of its historic and cultural resources.
Implementation (a): The town will notify the Division of Archives and History of any
construction activity in the vicinity of the Pender County Courthouse Square and the
Burgaw Railroad Depot.
Schedule: Continuing activity.
Implementation (b): The Burgaw Railroad Depot and the Pender County Courthouse
Square are designated as conservation areas.
Schedule: Continuing activity.
Implementation (c): The Town of Burgaw will investigate the feasibility/desirability of
having the Burgaw central business district designated as an historic district. The
assistance of the N. C. Division of Archives and History will be requested in making this
determination.
Schedule: FY2000-2001.
I
Section IV: Policy Statements IV-5 '
1

Industrial Impacts on Fragile Areas (issue discussed Pages I-32 and II-7) 1
Policy (a): Industrial development which is consistent with the policies contained in this plan, the
Town of Burgaw zoning ordinance, and federal. regulations may be' located within
conservation classified areas. Allowable industrial uses are defined in Appendix II of this
land use plan. The Town of Burgaw understands that this industrial development policy
may result in some net loss of wetlands as allowed through the 404 permit process.
Policy (b): The town supports industrial development that is compatible with its small town character.
However, development proposals will be reviewed on a case -by -case basis judging the
need for such development against any potentially adverse environmental impact.
Industries must be developed and operated without damage to groundwater resources or
adjacent productive agricultural lands.
Implementation: Burgaw will rely on its zoning ordinance to implement policies (a) and
(b).
Schedule: Continuing activity.
Package Treatment Plants (issue discussed Page I-47)
Policy: Burgaw will oppose the use of package treatment plants for residential districts; however,
the town will support the construction of package treatment plants which are approved and
permitted by the state Division of Water Quality for commercial, industrial, and
institutional development. If any package plants are approved, Burgaw supports a
requirement for a specific contingency plan specifying how ongoing private operation and
maintenance of the plant will be provided, and detailing provisions for assumption of the
ownership of the plant if initial ownership and operation should fail.
Implementation: The town will rely on the Division of Water Quality management for
implementation of this policy.
Schedule: Continuing activity.
Sea Level Rise
This is not an issue in Burgaw's planning jurisdiction.
Water Quality Management (issue discussed Page I-41 through I-43)
Policy: Burgaw supports the North Carolina Division of Water Quality Management's goals for
water quality management as stated on page I-42 of this plan.
1
Section IV: Policy Statements IV-6 '

I
Implementation: The town will review all local ordinances to determine what, if any,
revisions should be made to reduce the potential for impairment of water quality. Such
revisions may include but are not necessarily limited to:
-Reduction of the construction of impervious surfaces
-Provision of vegetative buffers along estuarine shorelines
-Allowing or requiring strip paving
-Requiring retention and/or detention pond facilities
Schedule: FY1999-2001
�. D. RESOURCE PRODUCTION AND MANAGEMENT POLICIES
Community Attitude Toward Resource Production
Burgaw supports responsible development within its planning jurisdiction and continued use of productive
agricultural lands and forest areas mindful of best management practices. The town also supports
preservation of its historic and culturally significant areas. There are no CAMA Areas of Environmental
Concern within Burgaw's planning jurisdiction.
Recreation Resources (issue discussed page I-58)
Policy (a): Burgaw will continue its ongoing efforts to create and maintain abundant open space
within the town, to improve existing recreational facilities, and to acquire additional open
space for public recreation facilities when financially feasible.
Implementation: Burgaw will develop a long range plan to address its recreational
needs.
Schedule: FY2002-2003.
Policy (b): The town supports preservation and expansion of its recreational activities.
Implementation: Burgaw will prepare and implement a long-range recreation plan.
Schedule: Prepare plan FY1998-1999.
IOff -Road Vehicles
Policy: Burgaw does not oppose the responsible use of off -road vehicles.
Implementation: No action required.
Productive Agricultural Lands (issue discussed page I-60 and I-69)
Policy (a): Burgaw desires to maintain its prime agricultural farmlands.
11 Section IV: Policy Statements IV-7 I

Implementation (a): Where agricultural production is occurring within Burgaw's planning
jurisdiction, the town supports and encourages the use of U. S. Natural Resources
Conservation Services Best Management Practices program to protect productive
agricultural lands.
Schedule: Continuing activity. I
Policy (b): Burgaw opposes the location of intensive livestock operations within its planning
jurisdiction. I
Implementation: The town will rely on its zoning ordinance to implement this policy.
Schedule: Continuing activity.
Productive Forestlands (issue discussed page I-69)
Policy: Burgaw supports the preservation of productive Forestlands.
Implementation: Burgaw encourages private land owners to support forestry best
management practices as defined in the Forestry Best Management Practices Manual,
1989, North Carolina Division of Forest Resources.
Schedule: Continuing activity.
Residential, Commercial, and Industrial/Development Impacts on Resources (issue discussed page I-29 and
II-9)
Policy (a): Residential, commercial, and industrial development will be allowed which is consistent
with the town's zoning ordinance and the policies contained in this plan. Development
will be regulated in conservation areas to reduce adverse environmental impacts. The
Town of Burgaw understands that its development policies may result in the net loss of
404 wetlands.
Implementation: Burgaw will rely on its zoning ordinance to enforce this policy.
Schedule: Continuing activity.
E. ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT POLICY STATEMENTS
Community Attitude Toward Economic and Community Development I
Burgaw desires to maintain its cultural and historical identity. Commercial, industrial, and residential
development will be controlled by the town's zoning and subdivision ordinances. Development which can
comply with the Town of Burgaw zoning ordinance and federal regulations may be located within
Conservation areas. Land use densities will be limited to those defined in the land classification section
which is supported by the town's zoning ordinance. The following economic and community development
activities will be encouraged:
Section IV: Policy Statements IV-8 I I

• Industrial development consistent with amended and revised zoning and subdivision
ordinances, and the policies of this plan.
• Commercial development consistent with amended and revised zoning and subdivision
ordinances, and the policies of this plan.
• Preservation of the historic and economic significance of the town's central business
district.
• Rehabilitation of substandard housing.
• Development of affordable housing.
Water Sup& (issue discussed page I-45/I-46 and II-10)
Policy: Burgaw will expand its water supply system to serve all residents, businesses, industries,
and governmental customers located within the corporate limits. As development occurs
and surplus capacity is available, the town will allow businesses, developers and
individuals to connect to the water supply system.
Implementation: The town will utilize local public and private fiscal resources and
available state/federal funds to expand its water supply system.
Schedule: Continuing activity.
Sewer System (issue discussed page I-47, II-6, and II-10)
Policy: The Town of Burgaw will provide needed sewer services, as economically feasible, to
accommodate new residential, commercial, and industrial development within the town
limits.
Implementation (a): The town will pursue the location of an alternative point of discharge
for its sewer treatment plant. Alternatives will include but not necessarily be limited to
the northeast Cape Fear River and a point located directly on Burgaw Creek.
Schedule: FY 1998-2003
Implementation (b): Burgaw will undertake long-range planning to ensure that its sewage
treatment plant will be adequately sized and designed to accommodate growth.
Schedule: FY 1998-2003
Solid Waste (issue discussed page I-50/1-51)
Policy (a): Burgaw opposes the location of a landfill within its planning jurisdiction.
Implementation (a): Burgaw will rely on its zoning ordinance to implement this policy.
Section IV: Policy Statements IV-9 '

Schedule: Continuing activity.
Implementation (b): Burgaw supports the disposal of its waste in the Sampson County
landfill.
Schedule: Continuing activity.
Policy (b): Burgaw supports efforts to recycle and reduce waste, including expansion of existing
recycling services.
Implementation: The town will cooperate with any efforts to educate people and businesses
on waste reduction and recycling. Burgaw supports recycling by its residents and
businesses and supports setting up practical collection methods and education efforts to
achieve a high degree of town -wide recycling.
Schedule: Continuing activity.
Types and Location of Planned Development (issue discussed page I-29 to I-44 and II-1 to II-9)
Policy (a): Burgaw will encourage and promote economic development while preserving its cultural
and historic character.
Policy (b): Burgaw will evaluate its zoning ordinance and map to secure and promote land use
compatibility.
Policy (c): Burgaw will encourage commercial and industrial activity that is compatible with the
town's surrounding land uses, that will not pose a threat to local groundwater resources,
and will not provide a potential threat to the health and safety of local residences due to
on -site storage of hazardous materials, excessive noise, or significant increase in traffic
volume.
Policy (d): Burgaw opposes industries which are unreasonably noxious by reason of the emission of
smoke, dust, glare, noise, and vibrations. Such industries will be identified pending
revisions to the town's zoning ordinance.
Policy (e): Industrial development and/or industrial zoning should not infringe on established
residential development.
Policy (f): Industrial parks with central water and sewer services will be the preferred locations for
industrial development.
Implementation: The Town of Burgaw will rely on revisions to its zoning ordinance and
map to implement policies (a) through (f).
Schedule: Zoning ordinance enforcement - ongoing activity;
Zoning ordinance revisions - FY1998-1999.
Section IV: Policy Statements IV-10 ' I

Policy (g): Following completion of zoning ordinance revisions, the town will consolidate all of its
various ordinances into one Unified Development Ordinance.
Implementation: The Town of Burgaw will apply for Division of Coastal Management
Technical Assistance Grant Funds to implement policy (g).
1 Schedule: FY1998-1999
Energy Facility
Siting and Development (issue discussed page I-56)
Policy (a):
Burgaw will review proposals for development or expansion of electric generating plants
within its vicinity on a case -by -case basis, judging the need for the facility against all
identified possible adverse impacts. The town reserves the right to comment on the
impacts of any energy facility construction or expansion within Pender County.
Implementation: The Town of Burgaw Board of Commissioners with support from the
Planning Board and Town Staff will implement this policy.
Schedule: Continuing activity.
Policy (b):
Burgaw does not oppose offshore oil/gas exploration or drilling.
Implementation: Burgaw will rely on the appropriate state and federal agencies to
implement this policy.
Schedule: Continuing activity.
Policy (c):
Burgaw supports the establishment/acquisition of easements for utility line extensions.
Implementations: Burgaw will rely on its subdivision ordinances to implement this policy.
Schedule: Continuing activity.
Redevelopment of Developed Areas (issue discussed page II-12)
Policy (a):
Burgaw supports the elimination of substandard housing.
Implementation (a): The town will enforce its minimum housing code.
Implementation (b): Burgaw will apply for available state and federal funds to aid in
housing rehabilitation.
ISchedule: Continuing activities.
Policy (b): Burgaw supports preservation/rehabilitation of its central business district.
I
ISection IV: Policy Statements
IV-11

Implementation: The town will undertake the following actions to implement this policy: I
-- Investigate the feasibility/desirability of having the central business
district designated as a historic district.
-- Review the town's zoning ordinance to determine what, if any, changes
should be made to support utilization of central business district
properties.
-- Consider participation in the North Carolina Main Street program.
-- Consider development of an annual cultural/festival event designed to
draw attention to the Burgaw central business district.
Schedule: FY1998-2003.
Commitment to State and Federal Programs (issue discussed - numerous references to state and federal
programs throughout the plan)
Policy: Burgaw will be receptive to and support all state and federal funding programs which are
beneficial to the town.
Implementation: The Burgaw Board of Commissioners will pursue funding and project
development through the following state and federal programs: N.C. Department of
Archives and History; N.C. Department of Transportation road and bridge improvement
programs; drainage planning and erosion control activities carried out by the Natural
Resources Conservation Service; dredging and channel maintenance by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers; community development block grants; low -to -moderate income
housing; housing rehabilitation; housing for the elderly; and the N.C. Housing Finance
Agency housing improvement programs.
Schedule: Continuing activity.
Tourism (issue discussed I-25 and I-26)
Policy: Burgaw views tourism as a significant contributor to the local economy and supports
continued development of the tourism industry.
Implementation (a): Burgaw will support the North Carolina Department of
Transportation's projects to improve access between the beaches and the rest of Pender
County.
Implementation (b): The town will support projects that will increase public access to
shoreline areas.
Section IV: Policy Statements IV-12 I I

Implementation (c): Burgaw will continue to support the activities of the North Carolina
Division of Travel and Tourism; specifically, the monitoring of tourism -related industry,
efforts to promote tourism -related commercial activity, and efforts to enhance and provide
shoreline resources.
Implementation (d): Burgaw will support Pender County and the Pender United Tourism
Committee in their efforts to promote heritage tourism.
Schedule: Continuing activities.
Transportation (issue discussed I-53/I-56 and II-8)
Policy: Burgaw supports transportation improvements which will improve highway safety,
regional accessibility, and traffic flow within the town's planning jurisdiction.
Specifically, Burgaw supports the following:
-- Construction of a N.C. 53 bypass, TIP project R-3302. The town will
lobby to secure a higher priority for this project.
-- Construction of an urban loop. The town will lobby to have this project
included in the North Carolina Department of Transportation TIP.
-- Widen N.C. 53 to five lanes with curb and gutter from I-40 to N.C. 53
bypass.
-- Construct a road connecting N.C. 53 to Stag Park Road (SR 1504).
' -- Five -lane 117 Bypass.
Land Use Trends (issue discussed II-5 through II-9)
The Town of Burgaw Planning Board and Board of Commissioners will consider the following in
deliberation of all zoning petitions:
-- All uses which are allowed in a zoning district must be considered. A decision to rezone
or not to rezone a parcel or parcels of property cannot be based on consideration of only
one use or a partial list of the uses allowed within a zoning district.
-- Staff projections and recommendations on each zoning petition should address the factors
a court considers when determining illegal spot zoning.
-- Requests for zoning changes should not be approved if the requested change will result
1 in spot zoning. Spot zoning is a form of discriminatory zoning whose sole purpose is to
serve the private interests of one or more land owners instead of furthering the welfare of
the entire community as part of an overall zoning plan. Although changing the zoning
classification of any parcel of land to permit a more intensive use could possibly constitute
spot zoning, the test lies in its relationship to the existing zoning pattern and guidelines
Section IV: Policy Statements IV-13 '

of the local comprehensive plan. Spot zoning is based on the arbitrary and inappropriate
nature of a rezoning change rather than, as is commonly believed, in the size of the area
being rezoned.
-- The concept of uniformity will be supported in all zoning deliberations. Uniformity is a
basic premise of zoning which holds that all land in similar circumstances should be zoned
alike; any different treatment must be justified by showing different circumstances.
-- Zoning regulations will be designed to lesson congestion in the streets; to secure safety
from fire, panic, and other dangers; to promote health and the general welfare; to provide
adequate light and air; to prevent the overcrowding of land; to avoid undue concentration
of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage,
schools, parks, and other public requirements. The regulations shall be made with
reasonable consideration, among other things, to the character of the district and its
peculiar suitability to particular uses, and with a view to conserving the value of buildings
and encouraging the most appropriate use of the land throughout the Town of Burgaw
planning jurisdiction.
-- Specifically, the Planning Board and Board of Commissioners may ask the following
questions:
• Does the Town of Burgaw need more land in the zone class requested?
• Is there other property in the community that might be more appropriate for this
use?
• Will the request have a serious impact on traffic circulation, parking space, sewer
and water services, and other utilities?
• Is there a good possibility that the request, as proposed, will result in lessening
the enjoyment or use of adjacent properties?
• Will the request, as proposed, cause serious noise, odors, light, activity, or
unusual disturbances?
• Does the request raise serious legal questions such as spot zoning, hardship,
violation of precedents, or need for this type of use?
Implementation: The Town of Burgaw Board of Commissioners and Planning Board, with the
support of the Town Staff, will be responsible for implementing the zoning ordinance.
Schedule: Continuing activity.
Section IV: Policy Statements IV-14 1

IF. CONTINUING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION POLICIES
As the initial step in the preparation of this document, Burgaw prepared and adopted a "Public
Participation Plan." The plan outlined the methodology for citizen involvement (see Appendix IV). Public
involvement was to be generated through public information meetings, and advertising in local newspapers.
In addition, the plan establishes that the Planning Board and Board of Commissioners are responsible for
preparation of the plan.
A public information meeting was conducted at the outset of the project on November 11, 1997, at 9:00
a.m., at the Pender County Library. Subsequently, meetings of the Planning Board and Advisory
Committee were held on December 16, 1997; January 20, 1998; February 17, 1998; March 17, 1998;
March 31, 1998; April 28, 1998; May 19, 1998; and October 20, 1998. All meetings were open to the
public. The Planning Board conducted a public information meeting for review of and comment on the
plan on June 8, 1998. The meetings were advertised in the Pender Post and/or the Pender Chronicle.
The preliminary plan was submitted to the Division of Coastal Management for comment on June 12,
1998. Following receipt of DCM comments, the plan was amended, and a formal public hearing on the
final document was conducted on December 8, 1998. The plan was approved by the Burgaw Board of
Commissioners on December 8, 1998 and submitted to the Coastal Resources Commission for certification.
The plan was certified on January 29, 1999.
Citizen input will continue to be solicited, primarily through the Planning Board, with advertised and
adequately publicized public meetings held to discuss special land use issues to keep citizens informed.
G. STORM HAZARD MITIGATION, POST -DISASTER RECOVERY, AND EVACUATION
PLANS
The purpose of this section of the 1998 CAMA Land Use Plan is to assist Burgaw in managing
development in potentially hazardous areas through establishing storm hazard mitigation policies and to
reduce risks associated with severe storms and hurricanes by developing post -disaster
reconstruction/recovery policies.
The following pages will present the storm hazard mitigation and post -disaster recovery policies, along
with appropriate discussions and maps. Map 6, page I-61, is included to indicate the potential impact of
flooding on existing land uses within the town's extraterritorial jurisdiction. FIRM maps have not been
prepared within Burgaw. As stated in the flood hazard areas of this plan, there is no existing development
located in flood hazard areas.
1. Storm Hazard Mitigation: Discussion
Hazard mitigation, or actions taken to reduce the probability or impact of a disaster, could involve
a number of activities or policy decisions. The starting point, however, is to identify the types
of hazards (including the relative severity and magnitude of risks), and the extent of development
(including residential, commercial, etc.) located in storm hazard areas.
Hurricanes are extremely powerful, often unpredictable forces of nature. The four potential causes
of fatalities and property damage are high winds, flooding, wave action, and erosion. Two of
these, high winds and flooding, apply to Burgaw.
Section IV: Policy Statements IV-15 '

a. High Winds I
High winds are the major determinants of a hurricane, by definition, i.e., a tropical
disturbance with sustained winds of at least 73 miles per hour. Extreme hurricanes can
have winds of up to 165 miles per hour, with gusts up to 200 miles per hour.
These winds circulate around the center or "eye" of the storm. Although the friction or
impact of the winds hitting land from the water causes some dissipation of the full force,
there is still a tremendous amount of energy left to cause damage to buildings, overturn
mobile homes, down trees and power lines, and destroy crops. Also, tornadoes are often
spawned by hurricane wind patterns. Wind stress, therefore, is an important consideration
in some storm hazard mitigation planning.
b. Flooding
Hurricane related flooding can cause extensive damage in inland areas, since many coastal
areas have low elevations and are located in high hazard or Zone A flood areas
according to the Federal Emergency Management Agency maps. Based on flood insurance
maps prepared for Burgaw's planning jurisdiction, approximately 35 % of the town's
corporate area and 20 % of the town's extraterritorial jurisdiction is classified as being in
the 100-year "high hazard" flood zone (see Map 6, page I-61). Consideration of potential
flood damage is important to Burgaw's efforts to develop storm mitigation policies.
C. Policy Statements: Storm Hazard Mitigation
In order to minimize the damage potentially caused by the effects of a hurricane or other
major storm, Burgaw will implement the town's disaster preparedness plan and support
the following policies: I
High Winds
Burgaw supports enforcement of the North Carolina State Building Code. The town will
continue to enforce the State Building Code on wind resistance construction with design
standards of 100 mile per hour wind loads.
Floodine
Burgaw supports its flood ordinance and continued enforcement of the 404 wetlands
development permit processes in areas potentially susceptible to flooding. When
reviewing development proposals, the town will work to reduce density in areas
susceptible to flooding. Burgaw is subject to hurricane flooding and water -related damage
which normally accompany major storms.
Hurricane force winds could cause significant damage in Burgaw to both structures and overhead
utilities. The town is located in a zone identified by the North Carolina State Building Code as
having a reasonable expectation of receiving 100 mile per hour winds during a major hurricane.
Section IV: Policy Statements IV-16 I I

1
1
[l
1
.1
1
The State Building Code requires that any new structure be designed to withstand 100 mile per
hour winds and that mobile homes be tied down and anchored.
Pender County maintains an up-to-date evacuation plan which identifies hurricane evacuation
routes and shelters, evacuation instructions, and anticipated evacuation times for different
severities of storms. The plan was prepared in cooperation with the Pender County Emergency
Management Office, the North Carolina Department of Crime Control and Public Safety, and the
Division of Emergency Management. The plan has been approved by Pender County and the
county's municipalities, including Burgaw.
Burgaw will continue to implement and support the following storm hazard mitigation, post
disaster recovery, and evacuation policies which were included in the 1993 land use plan:
• Burgaw supports the efforts of the Pender County Emergency Management
Coordinator to facilitate and encourage the safe evacuation of vulnerable areas of
the county during storm events.
• Burgaw officials will continue to actively participate in various scheduled
activities of coordination among towns in the county for storm preparedness,
evacuation, and post -disaster recovery.
• Burgaw will coordinate all development within the 100-year floodplain areas,
located in the town's extraterritorial area, with the town inspections departments,
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management, FEMA, and the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers.
• Burgaw will continue to support the enforcement of the North Carolina State
Building Code, particularly the provisions which require floodproofing measures.
• Because of the limited risk associated with hurricane flooding, the town will
support reconstruction of public facilities at same location. All structures located
within the Burgaw Creek floodplain (not floodway) will be rebuilt according to
standard floodproofing guidelines in order to mitigate future risk from hurricanes.
• Burgaw will discourage property owners from rebuilding destroyed structures
without taking mitigative precautions during the construction phase. The town
will also work with the Federal Flood Insurance Rate Program to include all areas
flooded by. storm into the FFIRP maps. Within the town's extraterritorial
jurisdiction, if areas are included in FFIRP maps, the regulations set forth in the
Pender County floodplain ordinance will establish reconstruction standards.
Section IV: Policy Statements IV-17 I

' SECTION V. RELATIONSHIP OF POLICIES
AND LAND CLASSIFICATIONS
The 15A NCAC 7B planning guidelines require that this land use plan relate the policies section to the land
classification map and provide an indication as to which land uses are appropriate in each land
classification. The Burgaw zoning ordinance is consistent with the land classification map and supports
the distribution of land uses shown on that map.
A. DEVELOPED CLASS
The Developed land classification includes the following categories: Developed Residential, Developed
Commercial, and Developed Industrial. Those categories include the residential,
commercial/office-institutional and industrial zoning districts which are defined by the Town of Burgaw
zoning ordinance.
1 Few changes in the locations of the land classification categories as shown on the Land Classification Map
are anticipated during the planning period. Burgaw's residential development should continue to be
primarily low to moderate density development. Commercial development will be concentrated in the
central business district and along the U.S. 117 Bypass. Industrial development will be concentrated in
the Burgaw Industrial Park areas.
B. URBAN TRANSITION CLASS
The urban transition class will provide lands to accommodate future urban growth within the planning
period. All uses which are permitted within the developed land classification will also be allowed within
the urban transition classification. However, it is anticipated that most development within this
' classification will be low density residential development. Complete urban services, including central
water and sewer service, may be extended into the urban transition areas within the planning period.
C. LIMITED TRANSITION
The limited transition classification is intended to provide for low density land uses including residential
use where limited water services are provided in order to avert an existing or projected health problem.
Areas meeting the intent of this class are appropriate for low intensity residential uses where lot sizes are
large and where the provision of services will not disrupt the primary rural character of the landscape.
Both water and sewer utilities may be provided by the Town of Burgaw. Most of Burgaw's extraterritorial
jurisdiction is classified limited transition. The limited transition category primarily includes areas which
are zoned RA-20, single-family residential district.
D. CONSERVATION CLASS
The conservation class is intended to provide for the effective long-term management of the town's
sensitive or irreplaceable fragile and environmentally sensitive areas. Fragile areas which are classified
conservation include the 404 wetlands, open space, historic properties, and 100-year floodplain areas.
Only development which is permitted by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and allowed by the town's
zoning ordinance will be allowed in the 404 wetlands areas.
Section V: Relationship of Policies and Land Classifications V-1 '
1

r= r m= m m" r== m m m= m r r m

APPENDIX I
SUMMARY OF 1993 POLICIES
B. RESOURCE PROTECTION POLICY STATEMENTS
1. Soils:
(a) Enforce all current regulations of the N. C. State Building Code and the Pender
County Health Department in all matters relating to septic tank
installation/replacement.
(b) Coordinate all development activity with appropriate county and state
regulatory personnel.
(c)
Stress low density development and development in areas with suitable soils.
(d)
The town will cooperate with the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers in the
regulation/enforcement of the 404 wetlands permit process. The town will
revise its subdivision ordinance to require the designation of 404 wetland areas.
2. Flood Hazard Areas:
(a)
Burgaw will continue to coordinate all development within the 100-year
floodplain with the town's Inspections Department, the North Carolina Division
of Coastal Management, FEMA, the U.S. Corps of Engineers, and Pender
County.
(b)
Burgaw will continue to enforce the Pender County flood damage prevention
ordinance within the extraterritorial jurisdiction area.
3. Groundwater/Protection of Potable Water Supplies:
(a)
Burgaw will strive to conserve its surficial* groundwater resources by
supporting the N. C. Division of Environmental Management stormwater
runoff regulations, enforcement of county and state sewage disposal
requirements, and NCAC Subchapters 2L and 2C, which regulate land uses
near groundwater resources.
�1
*Groundwaters which are at or just below the surface.
1

(b) Industrial development shall be discouraged from location in hydric soils areas. I
(c) Land uses near groundwater sources are regulated by the N. C. Division of
Environmental Management through NCAC Subchapters 2L and 2C. Burgaw
supports the enforcement of these regulations.
4. Manmade Hazards:
(a) Burgaw will support the technical requirements and state program approval for
underground storage tanks.
(b) The town opposes the temporary or permanent storage or disposal of any toxic
wastes, as defined by the Environmental Protection Agency, within its planning
jurisdiction.
(c) Burgaw opposes the transport of hazardous materials by transient traffic
through residential areas and the central business district.
(d) Burgaw opposes the location of any industries within its jurisdiction which
utilize or produce materials which are defined by the Environmental Protection
Agency as hazardous.
(e) Because industry can present hazards to other forms of development, only
,
similar land uses will be encouraged around industrial uses, industrial parks and
sandpits.
5. Stormwater Runoff:
(a) The town will support state regulations relating to stormwater runoff resulting
from development.
(b) The Town of Burgaw will continue to encourage and support the use of the
U.S. Soil Conservation Service and the Pender County Agricultural Extension
Service.
6. Solid Waste Disposal: The town will support only new landfill sites to serve Pender
County and its municipalities which will not adversely affect valuable groundwater
resources. The town is opposed to locating a landfill within Burgaw's planning
jurisdiction.
7. Cultural/Historical Resources:
(a) Burgaw will request developers to coordinate land disturbing activities with the
'
N. C. Division of Archives and History.
2

'
(b)
The Burgaw Railroad Depot and the Pender County Courthouse Square are
designated as conservation areas.
(c)
The Town of Burgaw will investigate the feasibilit/desirabilitY of having the
Burgaw central business district designated as a historic district.
8. Industrial Impacts on Fragile Areas:
(a)
No industrial development will be allowed in areas classified as conservation
areas. In other areas, industrial development will be allowed which is
consistent with the town's zoning ordinance.
(b)
Industrial development must be developed and operated without damage to
groundwater resources, wetlands, or adjacent productive agricultural lands.
9. Package
Treatment Plant Use: Burgaw will support the construction of package
treatment plants which are approved and permitted by the appropriate state agencies.
C. RESOURCE PRODUCTION AND MANAGEMENT POLICY STATEMENTS
1. Recreation Resources: Burgaw will continue its ongoing effort to maintain abundant
open space within the town, to improve existing recreational facilities, and to acquire
additional open space for public recreation facilities when financially feasible.
2. Productive Agricultural Lands: The town supports and encourages use of the U. S. Soil
Conservation Services Best Management Practices program.
3. Productive Forest Lands: Burgaw encourages and supports practices as defined in the
Forestry Best Management Practices Manual,1989, North Carolina Division of Forest
Resources.
4. Off -Road Vehicles: Burgaw does not oppose the responsible use of off -road vehicles.
D. ECONOMIC AND C0N[MUNITY DEVELOPMENT POLICY STATEMENTS
1. Water Sunnly: Burgaw will expand its water supply system to serve all residents,
businesses, industries and governmental customers located within the corporate limits.
2. Sewer System:
(a), The Town of Burgaw will seek CAMA funding through a technical assistance
grant to aid in the preparation of an inflow study for the town's sewer system.
3

(b) The town will pursue the location of an alternative point of discharge for its '
sewage treatment plant.
(c) The Town of Burgaw will remain committed to providing needed services, as '
is economically feasible, to accommodate new residential, commercial, and
industrial development within its planning jurisdiction.
3. Types and Location of Planned Development: 1
(a) discourage industrial and commercial development that is incompatible with
agricultural operations, potentially destructive to the local groundwater
resource, or that would be a possible nuisance and safety hazard to residents of
the town. The Town of Burgaw will not consider rezoning an area for any
industrial use which has the potential to cause one or more of those problems. j
(b) industrial development and/or industrial zoning should not infringe on
established residential development.
(c) industries should be given a fair case -by -case evaluation in order to compare
possible economic benefits with possible negative environmental effects.
4. Solid Waste Disposal: Burgaw supports a policy of cooperation with Pender County
to develop alternatives for solid waste disposal that will not endanger groundwater
resources or violate federal and state air quality standards.
5. Stormwater: '
(a) Burgaw will cooperate with the NCDOT, the N. C. Division of Environmental
Management, and other state agencies in mitigating the impact of stormwater
runoff on all areas.
(b) The town will attempt to apply for grant funds and utilize Powell Bill funds to
improve stormwater drainage systems associated with existing rights -of -way.
(c) The town will consider adopting a town -wide comprehensive master drainage
plan.
6. Energy F� acility Siting and Development:
(a) Burgaw will review proposals for development or expansion of electric
generating plants within its vicinity on a case -by -case basis, judging the need
for the facility against all identified possible adverse impacts. '
(b) Burgaw is opposed to any offshore oil/gas exploration or drilling.
4

1
7. Commitment to State and Federal Programs: The town will continue to fully support
the North Carolina Department of Transportation road and bridge improvement
programs, the CAMA planning process, the Corps of Engineers regulatory and
permitting efforts, Community Development Block Grant funding, Economic
Development Administration funding, North Carolina Housing Finance Agency
funding, HOME Project funding, and Farmers Home Administration funding for public
utilities including water and sewer systems.
8. Redevelopment of Developed Areas:
(a) The town will allow the reconstruction of any structures demolished by natural
disaster when the reconstruction complies with all applicable local, state and
federal regulations.
(b) Redevelopment/preservation of the central business district.
9. Tourism:
(a) Burgaw will continue to support the activities of the North Carolina Division
of Travel and Tourism; specifically, the monitoring of tourism -related industry
and efforts to promote tourism -related commercial activity.
10. Transportation:
(a) The Town of Burgaw will support the preparation of a Burgaw thoroughfare
plan by the N. C. State Department of Transportation.
(b) The Town of Burgaw supports the widening of U. S. 17 to four lanes from I-40
to Holly Ridge.
(c) The town supports the widening and straightening of N. C. 210 from I-40 to
U. S. 17.
(d) The town supports improvements to N. C. 53 between Burgaw and
Jacksonville.
11. Recreation: The town will develop a long-range comprehensive recreation plan to
address its recreational needs.

' APPENDIX II
BURGAW ZONING DISTRICT DEFINITIONS
AND TABLE OF PERMITTED USES
RA-20 Residential -Agricultural District: The purpose of this district shall be to maintain a
compatible mixture of single-family residential and agricultural uses with a density of two families per acre
for residential areas without community water and/or sewer. The regulations of this district are intended
to discourage any use which because of its character would substantially interfere with the development
of residences and which would be detrimental to the quiet residential nature of the areas included within
this district. No RA-20 district shall be less than four (4) acres in area.
' RA-20CU Residential -Agricultural Conditional Use District: Identical to the RA-20
Residential -Agricultural District except that a conditional use permit is required as a prerequisite to any
' use or development as provided for in this Ordinance. No RA-20CU district shall be approved unless it
is located in or adjacent to an established RA-20 district.
l
1
R-12 Residential District: The R-12 Residential District is established as a district in which the
principal use of land is for residential purposes and to insure that the residential development served by
both community/public water and sewer systems will occur at sufficiently low densities to maintain a
healthful environment. No R-12 district shall be less than four (4) acres in area.
R-12CU Residential Conditional Use District: Identical to R-12 Residential District except that
a conditional use permit is required as a prerequisite to any use or development as provided for in this
Ordinance. No R-12CU district shall be approved unless it is located in or adjacent to an established R-12
district.
R-5 Multi -Family Residential District: The R-5 Multi -Family Residential District is established
as a district in which the principal use of land is for two-family and multi -family residences. The
regulations of this district allow intensive development provided the necessary public or community water
and sewer systems are available. No R-5 district shall be less than four (4) acres in area.
R-5CU Multi -Family Residential Conditional Use District: Identical to the R-5 Multi -Family
Residential District except that a conditional use permit is required as a prerequisite to any use or
development as provided for in this Ordinance. No R-5CU district shall be approved unless it is located
in or adjacent to an established R-5 district.
R-5MH Residential Mobile District: This district is defined as medium -density residential areas
encompassing individual mobile homes and conventional single-family dwellings and additional open areas
where similar residential development will be a viable land use. The uses permitted in this district are
designed to stabilize and protect the essential character of the area and to prohibit all activities of a
commercial nature except certain home occupations controlled by specific limitations. The regulations of
this district allow intensive development provided the necessary public or community water and sewer
systems are available. No R-5MH district shall be less than four (4) acres in area.
Appendix II: Burgaw Zoning District Definitions and Table of Permitted Uses 1 '

R-5MHCU Residential Mobile Conditional Use District: Identical to the R-5MH Residential Mobile ,
Home District except that a conditional use permit is required as a prerequisite to any use or development
as provided for in this Ordinance. No R-5MHCU district shall be approved unless it is located in or
adjacent to an established R-5MH district.
PUD Planned Unit Development: This district is defined as an area characterized by orderly
integration of residential, commercial (inclusive of offices and institutions), and open space land uses which
conform to the design requirements contained herein. No PUD district shall be less than twenty-five (25)
acres in area.
,
PUDCU Planned Unit Development Conditional Use District: Identical to the PUD Planned
Unit Development District except that a conditional use permit is required as a prerequisite to any use or
development as provided for in this Ordinance. No PUDCU district shall be approved unless it is located
'
in or adjacent to an established PUD District.
O-I Office and Institutional District: This district is defined as certain land areas with structures
,
that provide office space for professional services and for certain institutional functions and residential
accommodations, usually medium or high density in nature. The district is normally small and may include
older homes undergoing conversion. This district is usually situated between business and residential
districts, and the regulations are designed to permit development of the permitted functions and still protect
and be compatible with nearby residential districts. No O-I district shall be less than four (4) acres in area.
O-ICU Office and Institutional Conditional Use District: Identical to the O-I Office and
Institutional District except that a conditional use permit is required as a prerequisite to any use or
development as provided for in this Ordinance. No O-ICU district shall be approved unless it is located
in or adjacent to an established O-I District.
B-1 Central Business District: The regulations for this district are designed to permit a
concentrated development of permitted facilities within the central portion of Burgaw with emphasis upon
large scale stores and specialized shops serving a retail trading area. No B-1 district shall be less than four
(4) acres in area.
B-1CU Central Business Conditional Use District: Identical to the B-1 Central Business District
except that a conditional use permit is required as a prerequisite to any use or development as provided for
in this Ordinance. No B-1CU district shall be approved unless it is located in or adjacent to an established
B-1 District.
,
B-2 Neighborhood Business District: The Neighborhood Business District is established as a
district in which the principal use of land is to provide for the retailing of goods and services to the adjacent
residential neighborhoods. The regulations of this district are intended to provide for retail trades and
services in designed shopping areas, where the nature of the development occurring is limited by standards
designed to protect the abutting residential areas. No B-2 district shall be less than four (4) acres in area.
B-2CU Neighborhood Business Conditional Use District: Identical to the B-2 Neighborhood
Business District except that a conditional use permit is required as a prerequisite to any use or
development as provided for in this Ordinance. No B-2CU district shall be approved unless it is located
in or adjacent to an established B-2 district.
'
Appendix II: Burgaw Zoning District Definitions and Table of Permitted Uses 2 '

n
G
I-1 Light Industrial District: This district is defined as an area in which manufacturing
establishments that produce commodities with a minimum of noise, gaseous emissions and other
objectionable external effects customarily associated with an industrial process may be developed. The
array of permitted uses is limited to the environmentally protective nature of this district. No I-1 district
will be less than four (4) acres in area.
I-1CU Light Industrial Conditional Use District: Identical to the I-1 Light Industrial District
except that a conditional use permit is required as a prerequisite to any use or development as provided for
in this Ordinance. No I-1CU district shall be approved unless it is located in or adjacent to an established
I-1 district.
I-2 Heavy Industrial District: This district is defined as an area where most manufacturing
establishments may be developed. This district is customarily located in proximity to railroad sidings
and/or major thoroughfares. The purpose of this district is to permit the normal operations of almost all
industries except those that would be detrimental to adjoining properties. Excluded from this district are
those industries which are noxious by [reason of] the emission of smoke, dust, glare, noise and vibrations
and those industries which deal primarily in hazardous products such as explosives. No I-2 district shall
be less than five (5) acres in area.
I-2CU Heavy Industrial Conditional Use District: Identical to the I-2 Heavy Industrial District
except that a conditional use permit is required as a prerequisite to any use or development as provided for
in this Ordinance. No I-2CU district shall be approved unless it is located in or adjacent to an established
I-2 district.
FP F1oodPlain District: The purpose of this district shall be to encourage the utilization of the
floodplains by uses which would not be damaged or destroyed by high waters.
Appendix II: Burgaw Zoning District Definitions and Table of Permitted Uses 3 1

fl
APPENDIX III
TOWN OF BURGAW
POLICIES CONSIDERED BUT NOT ADOPTED
' C. RESOURCE PROTECTION POLICIES
Flood Hazard Areas
-- Burgaw will not increase regulations governing development within flood hazard areas and will
rely on existing federal, state, and local regulations.
-- Burgaw will preserve/protect its flood hazard areas.
Manmade Hazards
-- Burgaw opposes the location of any industries within its jurisdiction which utilize or produce
materials which are defined by the Environmental Protection Agency as hazardous.
Stormwater Runoff
' -- Burgaw supports water quality maintenance in order to protect fragile areas and to provide clean
water for recreation purposes.
-- Burgaw supports actions to reduce the impact of stormwater runoff and to reduce drainage
problems within its planning jurisdiction.
Industrial Impacts on Fragile Areas
-- The Town of Burgaw does not want industrial development to result in any net loss of wetlands.
-- No industrial development will be allowed in areas classified as conservation areas. In other
' areas, industrial development will be allowed which is consistent with the town's zoning
ordinance. Allowable industrial uses are defined in Appendix II of this land use plan.
-- The town supports industrial development that is compatible with its small town character.
However, such development must be developed and operated without damage to groundwater
resources, wetlands, or adjacent productive agricultural lands.
-- The Town of Burgaw will support industrial development which may result in some net loss of
wetlands as allowed through the 404 permit process.
IAppendix III: Policies Considered But Not Adopted 1 '

D. RESOURCE PRODUCTION AND MANAGEMENT POLICIES
Off -Road Vehicles '
-- Off -road vehicles are not an issue within Burgaw's planning jurisdiction and a policy is not
needed. I
E. ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT POLICY STATEMENTS '
Types and Location of Planned Development
-- Burgaw will continue to enforce the town's existing zoning ordinance to ensure land use ,
compatibility.
-- Burgaw will discourage industrial and commercial development that is incompatible with '
agricultural operations, potentially destructive to the local groundwater resource, or that would
be a possible nuisance and safety hazard to residents of the town. The Town of Burgaw will not
consider rezoning an area for any industrial use which has the potential to cause one or more of
those problems.
-- With the construction of Interstate 40, the town anticipates continued industrial growth. The town '
will encourage industries to locate within parks where possible.
Energy Facility Siting and Development '
-- Burgaw is opposed to any offshore oil/gas exploration or drilling.
Transportation
-- Selectively remove on street parking in some central business district areas. '
Land Use Trends
-- Zoning decisions will not be based on aesthetic considerations. '
-- Zoning which will result in strip development will be discouraged. Strip development is a ,
melange of development, usually commercial, extending along both sides of a major street. Strip
development is often a mixture of auto -oriented enterprises (e.g., gas stations, motels, and food
stands), truck -dependent wholesale and light industrial enterprises along with the once -rural homes '
and farms that await conversion to commercial use. Strip development may severely reduce
traffic -carrying capacity of abutting streets.
1
1
Appendix III: Policies Considered But Not Adopted 2 1 1

Section III: Land Classification System
In response to state comments received by the Town of Burgaw on October 9, 1998, an additional
meeting was conducted with the Planning Board on October 20,.1998 to revisit the issue of whether
to include or exclude 404 Wetlands from Conservation classified areas. It was necessary to revisit
1 areas included in the Conservation classification to address an inconsistency with the policy statement
section of this plan. Following discussions, the Planning Board gave unanimous consent to remove
404 Wetlands from the Conservation classification. This action established consistency between the
' Land Classification System and the town's policy statements. Although this action did not necessitate
the revision of any of the town's policy statements, this explanation has been included under Policies
Considered But Not Adopted because the Land Classification System is directly linked to the town's
' policy statements and therefore, relevant to this Appendix.
Appendix III: Policies Considered But Not Adopted 3 '
1

APPENDIX IV
TOWN OF BURGAW
' CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
PREPARATION OF LAND USE PLAN
FISCAL YEAR 1997-98
' The Town of Burgaw has received a FY97-98 Coastal Area Management Act ant for the
g g �
' update of its existing Land Use Plan. Adequate citizen participation in the development of the
Plan is essential to the preparation of a document responsive to the needs of the citizens of
Burgaw. To ensure such input, the following citizen participation program will be utilized by
' the town.
The Planning Board will work with the town's planning consultant to ensure that the final
' product will survey existing land use, identify policies, and recommend strategies/actions. The
plan will focus on issues expected to occur during the planning period, including infrastructure
needs, housing needs, transportation planning, and environmental concerns. A completely new
land classification map will be provided. Specifically, the planning consultant and the Planning
Board will be responsible for ensuring accomplishment of the following:
An updated land use plan based on an effective citizen participation process.
Development of new policies required to respond to the revised 15A NCAC 7B planning
requirements.
Assessment of current land use, by a tax parcel base map.
Assessment of storm drainage needs/issues.
-- Assessment of development impacts on 404 wetlands.
Assessment of parks and recreation.
Assessment of annexation areas.
-- Assessment of community facilities needs.
' -- Assessment of continuing water and sewer needs.
The following schedule will be utilized:
1. November, 1997 -- The Board of Commissioners will conduct a public information
meeting and adopt the Citizen Participation Plan. The meeting will be advertised in a
' local newspaper. The town will specifically discuss the policy statements contained in
the 1993 Town of Burgaw Land Use Plan. The significance of the policy statements to
the CAMA land use planning process shall be described. The process by which the
Town of Burgaw will solicit the views of a wide cross-section of citizens in the
development of the updated policy statements will be explained.
' 2. November, 1997 -- Conduct issues identification meeting. The town will conduct an
issues identification meeting. The Consultant will serve as facilitator for the meeting.
Invitations to the meeting will be mailed by the Mayor to local business and civic
leaders. Those attending will be divided into small (five to eight person) discussion
groups. Each group will be asked to individually identify land use -related issues. At the

conclusion of the meeting, each group will appoint a spokesperson to report their
identified issues to the entire group. The identified issues will be recorded on large
poster paper. Following the group issues identification, all participants will be requested
to identify in priority order the top 10 to 15 issues. Following the .meeting, the
Consultant will compile a composite ranking of the individual issue ratings. The
composite ranking will be provided to the Planning Board and Board of Commissioners.
3. November, 1997 -- complete identification of existing land use problems, develop
socioeconomic base data, and review community facilities needs.
4. November, 1997 - Initial meeting with the Planning Board to review the process for the
Land Use Plan Update and distribute sections of the plan that have been drafted.
5. November, 1997 / February, 1998 -- Continue preparation of a draft Land Use Plan and
conduct meetings with the Burgaw Planning Board.
6. March, 1998 -- Present complete draft sections of the plan and preliminary policy
statements to the Burgaw Planning Board.
7. May, 1998 -- Review draft Land Use Plan with Board of Commissioners, conduct a
public information meeting for review of the proposed plan, and submit draft of
completed Land Use Plan to the Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources Division of Coastal Management staff for review and comment.
8. Following receipt of Division of Coastal Management comments (estimate August, 1998)
-- Present proposed Land Use Plan to Board of Commissioners for adoption, and conduct
a formal public hearing.
All meetings of the Town of Burgaw Planning Board and Board of Commissioners at which the
update of the Land Use Plan will be discussed will be advertised in a local newspaper in a non-
legal ad section. In addition, public service announcements will be mailed to local radio stations
and posted in the Municipal Building. All meetings will be open to the public. At each
Planning Board meeting, the public will be provided an opportunity to comment on the land use
plan. The town will encourage and consider all economic, social, ethnic, and cultural
viewpoints. No major non-English speaking groups are known to exist in Burgaw.
10/27/97
LANDUSE\CPP.BURGAW