1991 Land Use Plan Update-1991

C%
)I DCM COPY
Please do not remove.
Division of Coastal Management Copy
N
o�
i

X.
1991
AURORA LAND USE PLAN
UPDATE
Adopted by the Aurora Town Council on September 9, 1991.
Certified by the North Carolina Coastal Resources Commission on September 27, 1991.
i
I
The preparation of this report and accompanying maps was financed in part through a grant provided by the North Caro�.ina Coastal
Management Program, through funds provided by the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, which is admistered by
the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. I

1991 AURORA LAND USE PLAN UPDATE
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Prepared for the Aurora Town Council
Grace Bonner, Mayor
Bessie LaVictoire Webster Walker
Duke Jennings Shirley Nanney
Sandra Bonner, Town Clerk
Prepared by the Aurora Planning Commission
W.B. Thompson, Chairman
Marvin Sartin Charles Harding
Lloyd Hollowell Bill Herwig
Brian Litchfield
With Technical Assistance from
The Mid -East Commission j
P.O. Box 1787
Washington, NC 27889
[phone]
Robert J. Paciocco, Planner -in -Charge
Tamara Schatz, Technical Advisor

1
Il
C
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
L INTRODUCTION ......................................... 1
IL INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS ..................................
A. HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE ................................
B. POPULATION ...........................................
1. Present Conditions .. .. ......... .............. .
2. Trends ............. ........... ... ...... .........
3. Population Estimates ....................................
C. ECONOMY ........ .............. ..................
D. NATURAL RESOURCES .... ......................... .
1. Topographic. Features. ...................................
2. Geologic Features ......................................
3. Hydrologic Features .............. .................... .
4. Meteorologic Features ...................................
E. EXISTING LAND USE .....................................
F. COMMUNITY FACILITIES ......................... ..... .
1. Existing Plans and Regulations ............ ............. .
2. Existing Capacity .......................................
G. SUMMARY .............................................
H. 1986 POLICY STATEMENTS ................................
1. Resource Protection ....................................
2. Resource Production and Management ........................
3. Economic and Community Development ................ .... .
111. 1991 POLICY STATEMENTS ....................................
A. RESOURCE PROTECTION ............. ............... .
1. Development in Areas with Constraints ... ......... .... .
2. Areas of Environmental Concern Development ..................
3. Other Fragile Areas ....................................
4. Hurricane and Flood Evacuation ............................
5. Means of Protection of Potable Water .........................
6. Use of Package Treatment Plants ...........................
7. Storm Water Runoff.......................... ....
... .
8. Marina, Floating Home, and Dry Stack Development ..............
9. Industrial Impacts Around Fragile Areas ......................
10. Sound and Estuarine System Islands ........................ .
11. Areas Affected by a Five -Foot Rise in Sea Level .................
12. Upland Excavation for Marina Basins ........................
13. Damage to Existing Marshes by Bulkhead Installation .............
1
1
2
3
.6
7
10
11
11
11
14
16
16
16
19
21
21
21
22
22
24
24
24
25
26
28
28
29
30
30
31
32
32
32
33

B. RESOURCE PRODUCTION AND MANAGEMENT ...................
1. Productive Agricultural Land..................................i
2. Existing and Potential Mineral Production Areas ....................
3. Commercial and Recreational Fisheries ..... ................... .
4. Commercial Forest Lands ................. ................ .
5. Off -Road Vehicles ... ............................ . .
C. ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .....................
1. Location and Types of Industries Desired ............. ..... .
2. Commitment to Providing Services ........................ ... .
3. Desired Urban Growth Patterns ................................
4. Redevelopment of Developed Areas .............................
5. Commitment to State and Federal Programs .......................
6. Assistance to Channel Maintenance .............................
7. Energy Facility Siting ................................... . .
8. Tourism and Beach/Water Access . ............................ .
9. Types, Densities, and Location of Anticipated Development .............
D. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ......................................
E. STORM HAZARD MITIGATION, POST -DISASTER RECOVERY AND
EVACUATION PLANS ........................................
IV. 1991 LAND CLASSIFICATION ...................................
A. DEVELOPED ...............................................
B. URBAN TRANSITION ..................... ................. .
C. COMMUNITY ...............................................
D. RURAL ..... ....... .... ...............
E. CONSERVATION ...................... .... .... ..
F. RELATIONSHIP TO POLICIES AND LAND CLASSIFICATION ...........
V. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ........................
VL SUMMARY ................................................
ii
33
33
34
35
35
36
37
37
38
39
39
40
41
41
41
42
43
L;1
55
55
55
57
57
57
58
C1l7
63

LISTING OF TABLES, FIGURES, AND MAPS
PAGE
TABLE 1. Population Change from 1960 to 1990,
Aurora and Beaufort County ..............................
2
TABLE 2.
Employment In Aurora by Persons 16 Years
and Over by Industry .... .......... ..................
8
TABLE 3.
Full -Time and Part -Time Employees by Mayor Industry,
BeaufortCounty .......................................
9
TABLE 4.
Aurora Area Manufacturing Firms .......................... .
10
TABLE S.
Public School Facilities ..................................
20
TABLE 6.
Inventory of Structures in Hazard Area,
Aurora, North Carolina ..................................
47
FIGURE 1.
Count of Population by Age, Race, and Sex,
Beaufort County, April 1, 1990 .............................
4
FIGURE 2.
Projected Population by Age, Race, and Sex,
Beaufort County, April 1, 2000 .............................
5
MAP 1A.
Soil Distribution, Aurora 1990 ..............................
12
MAP 1B.
Wetlands Inventory Map ...................................
12A
MAP 2.
Areas of Environmental Concern and Historic Areas
Aurora1990 . ... .... ... ..................
15
MAP 3A.
Existing Land Use, Aurora 1990 ............................
17
MAP 3B.
Existing Land Use, Aurora 1990 ............ ...... ......
18
MAP 4.
Hazard Areas, Aurora 1990 . ......... ... ..........
45
MAP 5.
Land Classification, Aurora 1990 ............................
56
APPENDIXA
..................................................
64
iii

I. INTRODUCTION
Land Development occurs as a direct result of a series of decisions by private individuals and the
government. If this development is left entirely to chance, the result may not be the best for the
community as a whole. Land use plans are made and kept current to direct land use decisions that
promote overall community interest for present and future generations.
Land use plans are used by local governments in the coastal areas to:
• provide guidance in local policy decisions relating to overall community development;
• . provide the basis for development regulations and capital facility planning and budgeting;
• delineate how the community wishes to grow;
• encourage coordination and consistency between local land use policies and the State and
Federal governments; and
• supply policy guidelines for government decisions and activities which affect land uses in
the coastal area.
Effective use of the plan by private individuals, local leaders, and all levels of government will lead
to more efficient and economical provision of public services, protection of natural resources, sound
economic development, protection of public health and safety, and enhancement of Aurora's quality of
life.
The Town of Aurora prepared their original Land Use Plan in 1976. It was updated in 1981 and
1986. The preparation of this report, the 1991 Land Use Plan Update, was financed in part through a
grant provided by the North Carolina Coastal Management Program, through funds provided by the
Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, which is administered by the Office of Ocean and
Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
II. INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS
A. HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
Aurora's history is tied to farming, fishing, and phosphate mining. Indians made use of the abundant
fish and have been in the area for hundreds of years. The first immigrants to the area made use of the
rich farmland by growing potatoes and other crops. Phosphate has been a relatively recent phenomenon.
The first mine opened in the mid-1960s, and such mining will be affecting Aurora for the next hundred
years.
The Reverend W.H. Cunningham, a Methodist clergyman, moved into the area in the mid-1800s. He
named the town Aurora, and some interpret it to mean a new land in the East, due to the fertile land;
while others say that it was such a dark, dismal place, it needed light. He built a church and school and
laid off the first streets. The Town was incorporated in 1880.
1

2
B. POPULATION
1. Present Conditions
The Town of Aurora, North Carolina, is situated on South Creek, a tributary of the Pamlico
'
River, in southern Beaufort County. It is a Town which, until the early 1960s, existed primarily as a
fishing and farming community. Since then, however, the population has risen significantly and the
economy of the Town has changed.
In the past thirty years, Aurora has grown by more than 31 percent (Table 1). Beaufort County has
'
also increased its population, but not at the same magnitude as Aurora.
Studying the past three decades reveals that most of the growth in Aurora occurred between 1960
and 1970 (24.2%). This coincides with the decision by Texasgulf to locate a phosphate mining plant near
'
Aurora. Residential and service industry development accommodated this subsequent growth.
Between 1970 and 1980 population has increased slowly but steadily at a rate of 12.7% for the decade.
This growth is due, in part, to Texasgulf employees locating closer to work. Since 1980, according to the
'
US Census counts, growth has declined slightly by 6.4% and may reflect the differential in the birth and
death rate. However, the Town does not agree with the Census count and believes it to be inaccurate.
'
TABLE 1. Population Change from 1960 to 1990, Aurora and Beaufort County.
%POPULATION CWNGE
'
1960- 1980-
1960* 1970* 1980+ 1990+ 1990 1990
'
AURORA 499 620 699 654 31.1 -6.4
BEAUFORT
'
COUNTY 36,014 35,980 40,385 42,293 17.4 4.7
Source: *NC Office of.State Budget and Management.
+US Census Bureau.
Seasonal population changes are not substantial enough to pose excessive demands on public services,
town facilities, or other resources. Recreational activities such as hunting and fishing attract a very small
number of tourists and summer residents to the area.
The population of the Richland Township, inclusive of Aurora's jurisdiction, is composed of 52%
white and 48% non -white. Population in Beaufort County is approximately 70% white and 30% non-
white (1988 estimates from the NC Office of State Budget and Management).
Median age of Beaufort County residents is 34 years compared to 32.6 years for the State (1988
estimate). This means that half of Beaufort County's residents, including Aurora, is younger than 34 and
the other half is older.

1
0
3
2. Trends
An analysis of growth trends will indicate future pressures on the land and .water resources as well
as public services and facilities. Examination of historic growth patterns provides the basis for forecasting
future population levels in the Aurora area.
A population can best be described in terms of age, sex, race and its distribution.' Age structure is
probably the most important population characteristic in estimating future demands for services and
facilities such as schools, housing, and public works. Sex. and age characteristics are the basic causative
elements in determining birth and death rates, as well as mortality and migration trends.
The population pyramid combines several population characteristics into one complete graph.
Projected population of Beaufort County for the years 1990 and 2000 are contained in Figures 1 and 2.
By examining the shape of the pyramids, it is possible to study the population's combined
characteristics. The interpretations for the Beaufort County pyramids are as follows:
1990 Population Pyramid (Figure 1)
• The base stays fairly stable, with only a few erratic differences among the younger age
groups. This indicates an overall stabilization of birth rates. In the future, the demand
on the area's school system should be fairly stable.
• The 20-24 age group curves inward. This may be an indication of some out -migration
of young adults in search of job opportunities elsewhere. The estimated rates of net
migration in the 1990 decade for all age groups is as follows: White males - 11.66%,
white females-12.08%, non -white males - 3.34%, non -white females - 4.44% (North
Carolina Office of State Budget and Management).
• The middle section bulges outward. This indicates that a relatively large portion of the
population, especially the white sector, is between 25 and 39.years old. This section of
the population constitutes a major portion of the'labor force and buying power of the
County.
The upper portion of the pyramid differs greatly for white and non -white population.
The white population experiences a somewhat steady decline toward the older ages,
especially for males. The non -white population dips inward rapidly for persons at the
ages of 50-54 and is followed by a slight recovery before diminishing at the top. In
general, there is a large proportion of persons between the ages of 50 to 69, most of
which are female. Demands on health services and recreation should remain somewhat
stable, with specialized recreation programs for this older population in steady demand.
The disproportionately large number of women over 50 indicates that future emphasis
should be placed on providing cultural and recreational programs designed for older
women.

1990
.A.
11
700
700
MALE FEMALE
WHITE
NONWHITE
FIGURE 1. Count of population by age, race, and sex, Beaufort County, April 1, 1990. Source: NC Office of State Budget and Management.

r r r r r r r r r r rr r r rr rr air � Ir r
ii
700
2000
MALE FEMALE
RII WHITE
N0N-WHITE
0
V,
FIGURE 2 Projected population by age, race, and sex, Beaufort County, April 1, 2000. Source: NC Office of State Budget and Management.

6
2000 Population Pyramid (Figure 2)
'
There is a bulge in the base of the pyramid indicating an increase in future birth rates.
In the future there should be an increased demand on area school systems.
'
For the white population, the pyramid becomes concave between the ages of 15-24. The
decline in these age groups could be a result of past trends of conservancy in birthrates.
The same may be true, in combination with possible out -migration trends, for the non-
white population for ages 20-34.
• Peak population counts in the white sector occur in the 40-44 age group, with subsequent
declines on both ends of this range. The non -white population portion of the pyramid
curves outward around the 40-44 age group, although peak population for this sector
remains in the 10-14 age group. This general bulge in the middle of the pyramid means
that most of the population of Beaufort County will be middle-aged in the year 2000.
This section of the population constitutes a major portion of the labor force and buying
power of the county and indicates future stability in these areas.
• The disproportionately large number of female population over 60 years old demonstrates
a common trend that women tend to outlive their male counterparts. In the future,
more emphasis should be placed on providing cultural and recreational programs designed
for older women.
The County's population projections shown in the pyramids (Figures 1 and 2) are North Carolina
'
Office of State Budget and Management estimates based on the 1970 and 1980 Census data. These aspects
of age/sex and racial population structure should be considered for future planning endeavors in the
Aurora area.
3. Population Estimates
Trends for Beaufort County described in the previous section show population increased at a moderate
rate. Aurora's population is not anticipated to follow the same trend if Census data is correct. Aurora's
rate of growth decreased slightly from 1980 to 1990 (Table 1). While State Data Center projections show
a steady increase for Aurora, the,1990 US Census data will undoubtedly reverse this projection. It must
be noted that the Town Council does not agree with the US Census count.. While a door-to-door census
has not been taken to confirm this opinion, a check of the residential water and sewer hook-ups give a
clear indication of a higher count. Currently there are 300 residential hook-ups. Multiplying this by an
average of 2.5 persons per household and adding 6 homes not on the Town system, a more probable
population for Aurora would be 765. The Town believes they will experience a moderate growth rate.

1
1
VJ
The Town can easily support a moderate rate of growth. The water and sewer systems have adequate
capacity. The road network is currently underutilized. The school system can handle,a moderate increase
in the number of students. The Town. has an ample amount of vacant land for new dwellings and
businesses: -
C. ECONOMY
In 1987, Beaufort County's per capita income was $11,289 and ranked 52nd in the State, with North
Carolina's per capita income at $13,322 (Bureau of Economic Analysis).
Table 2 shows employment of persons in Aurora that are 16 years or older by industry. As you can
see, the economy is mixed. Nearly 35 percent of those employed are in the fishing, farming, forestry, or
mining business. The phosphate industry is a major employer for eastern North Carolina as well as
Aurora. Table 3 shows full- and part-time employees by major industry in Beaufort County.
Aurora's economy is highly dependent on the phosphate mining industry for jobs and revenue. But,
it is important to note that the local phosphate mining industry is sensitive to the world phosphate market.
Any significant decline in demand would have serious implications for Aurora and would create economic
distress for Beaufort County as well.
As stated previously, primary industries like farming, fishing, forestry, and mining constitute more
than one-third the total employment (Table 2). Agriculture, although not a major employer in the area,
is still an important component of the Aurora economy. The overall decrease in agricultural employment
has . been triggered by the widespread use of heavy machinery and the introduction of farming
methodologies which require less labor.

8
TABLE 2. Employment in Aurora by Persons 16 Years and Over by Industry.
INDUSTRY TOTAL PERSONS PERCENT
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, and mining
85
34.7
Construction
10
4.0
Manufacturing
37
15.1
Transportation
7
2.8
Communications and other public utilities
4
1.6
Wholesale trade
24
9.8
Retail trade
23
9.4
Finance, insurance, and real estate
9
3.6
Business and repair services
4
1.6
Personal, entertainment, and recreation services
5
2.0
Health services
6
2.45
Education services
18
7.3
Other professional and related services
0
0.0
Public administration
13
5.3
TOTAL
245
UNEMPLOYMENT
21
8.57
Source: North Carolina Statistical Abstract, 1984.

9
TABLE 3. Full -Time and Part -Time Employees by Major
Industry, Beaufort County.
'
TOTAL EMPLOYMENT
1987
21,791
% OF TOTAL
100%
'
BY TYPE:
Wage and salary
18,063
83
Proprietors
3,728
17
Farm
876
4
Non -farm
2,852
13
'
BY INDUSTRY:
Farm
1,399
6
'
Non -farm
20,392
94
Private
17,322
79
Agricultural services
Forestry, fishing,and other*
362
2
Mining
(D)
-
Construction
1,222
6
'
Manufacturing
5,594
26
Transportation and- public utilities
599
3
Wholesale trade
969
4
Retail trade
3,508
16
Finance, insurance, and real estate
785
.4
Services
(D)
Government and governmental enterprises
3,070
14
'
Federal, civilian
118
.5
Military
161
.7
State and local
2,791
4
Source: Regional Economic Information System,
Bureau of
Economic Analysis, April 1989.
*"Other" consists of the number of jobs held by US residents employed by international
organizations and foreign embassies.
(D) Not shown to avoid disclosure of confidential
information.
'
NOTE: Percentages are rounded.

1
10
The fishing and seafood industry is an important component of the economy due to the large number
of people it employs. There are currently three seafood processing plants in Aurora which employ over
one hundred people during the peak season. These seafood businesses deal with crab, shrimp, and various
types of fin6sh.
'
Recreational fishing and boating provide an unknown but suspectedly large boost to the Aurora
economy. Fuel, food, beverages, bait, and marine supplies are items commonly purchased by these seasonal
recreators. Of particular note are the waterfowl hunters who travel through Aurora heading to hunting
areas east of Town. These hunters have a definite, if brief, impact on the local businesses.
'
Table 4 lists Aurora area manufacturing firms. Texasgulf employs a significant number of workers.
Most other local industries are reliant on the seafood industry for their existence. Aurora has become a
good site for industrial location because of the extensive amount and types of raw material it can provide
'
for manufacturing.
TABLE 4. Aurora Area Manufacturing Firms.
1
# OF
NAME LOCATION PRODUCT EMPLOYEES
'
Texasgulf, Inc. North of Aurora's Phosphoric acid,
Planning Area Phosphate products 1200
Henries Fishing Supplies NC Hwy 33 Wire crab pots >10
'
Bay Crab Co. NC Hwy 306 Crab 50-99
.City processing
'
Aurora Packing Co. NC Hwy 33 Crabmeat, raw crabs 20-49
Hudson ManufacturingNCH 33 Clothing 60-80
Hwy g
(to be relocated
to First Street)
D.C. Crab Co. Main Street Crab processing 30-35
Source: 1987-88 Directory of Manufacturing Firms; Interviews with Manufacturing Firms (May 1990).
' D. NATURAL RESOURCES
Natural resource protection in conjunction with economic development is the primary function of
' this land use plan. Water and air quality are directly affected by man's interaction with the environment.
Planning allows the land user to identify features that require special attention. Topographic, geologic,
hydrologic, and meteorologic features. all interact to form present conditions. A change in one or more
features can be a result of a revision in land use. The following sections describe features that may need
' special attention.

11
1. Topographic Features
The level terrain of Aurora and the surrounding area has played an important part in community
development. Farming is easier and less costly when compared with, other areas of the State. Many
parcels of vacant or agricultural land possess natural amenities conducive to a desirable living environment.
' Excessive slope is not a problem in the Aurora area; the lack of slope is more of a problem. Slopes
that exceed 12 percent, i.e., where the change in elevation is 12 feet or more per one hundred feet of
horizontal run, are considered excessive. Seventy-five percent of the land in the Aurora planning area is
less than 10 feet above sea level. The higher ground is mostly on the west and southwest sides of the
planning area.
The natural vegetation for the Aurora area is marshland and mixed forest. Changes in drainage
patterns have reduced the amount of marsh. The natural forestland has been replaced with pine forest.
' 2 Geologic Features
' Any land use plan must consider soil types and subsurface geology in making future plans. Soil types
and suitability classifications are important factors in determining land use. Soils in the Aurora planning
area have been mapped by the Beaufort County Soil Conservation Service. The soil survey is used to
' determine which soils present developmental limitations due to wetness or high shrink -swell potential.
The local soils are composed mostly of Tomotley and Arapahoe fine sandy loams, Portsmouth loams,
and Dragston loamy sand. Approximately 60 percent of the planning area is covered by Tomotley soil
association (Map 1). This type soil is poorly drained and creates severe limitations on septic tank
' placement because of their slow permeability, poor filtering ability, and wetness. In addition, although not
normally a problem, soil shallowness may be a constraint for some types of development within the
Tomotley association.
' In summary, all soils in the Aurora area have limitations for the efficient placement of septic tanks
and the Tomotley association may cause problems for the stability of some building foundations. The
overall development implications will translate into higher overall costs per unit.
One of the major factors affecting future land use patterns in. and around Aurora will be the
' phosphate deposits located in the planning area and the surrounding region. The quality and quantity
of the phosphate ore plays a significant role in forming future land use patterns.
The first consideration is. ' the quality of the ore and the specific effects it has on land use. The quantity, thickness, and boundaries of the deposits were a major consideration prior to Texasgulfs
investment in an operation. Measurements, analyses,.and feasibility studies were made before any mining
began. Estimates were made that reserves would last well into the 21st Century based on current levels
of production. .
The availability of the phosphate ore affects the area by reducing land speculation. Texasgulf
ownership may result in former farmland or woodland lying idle until excavation occurs. The land
could be productive in a variety of ways if it was not mined. Urban -type development may be slow in
1 coming to an area that could be eventually mined.
3. Hydrologic Features
' Wetlands, floodplains, groundwater, and estuaries are all features that must be constantly monitored
and are easily affected by changes in land use. These features help provide habitats for various types of
' wildlife, drinking water, and sources of commercial activities.

Estuarine, Sub Tidal, Unconsolidated Bottom
WETLANDS INVENTORY MAP
Estuarine, Emergency, Irregularly Flooded
Riverine, Tidal, Unconsolidated Bottom
Palustrine, Emergent, Semipermanent Tidal
Palustrine, Scrub/Shrub, Broad Leaved Deciduous/Evergreen, Semipermanent Tidal
+t Palustrine, Forested, Broad/Needle Leaved Deciduous, Evergreen, Temporarily, Semipermanently/
+ + Permanently/Seasonally Flooded
aUpland, Non -Wetland
e 'r
4
St Stephen.
,i FWA
PSStMA
• j
Is ,
• pF0IMAj
. 1
l
12a
e
MAP 1B

'
13
Inland and coastal wetlands are areas that have been identified by the US Fish and Wildlife Service
as being important for water quality. These areas contain types of plants, soils, and water coverage that
make them unique. Activities within the wetlands are governed by regulations enforced by the Army Corps
of Engineers and the Division of Coastal Management (DCM). Inland wetlands may not be connected to
a major body of water. They could be natural depressions or land surrounding manmade ponds. Many
'
of the natural areas may have been altered by changes in drainage patterns. Coastal wetlands are of
particular importance as fish hatcheries. In the Aurora area the nearest fish hatchery areas are in Jack's,
Jacobs, Drinkwater and. Tooley Creeks. All are located at least one (1) mile downstream from the Town.
'
Many of these areas have been designated Areas of Environmental Concern (AEC) (Map 2).
The dynamic nature of the AECs prevents an accurate mapping. South Creek, north of Deephole
Point, is designated as public trust waters and banks are considered coastal wetlands. The area of South
Creek downstream. from Whitehurst Creek has been classified as estuarine waters. This area and the
adjoining shoreline for a distance of 75 feet landward from. the. mean high water mark have been
designated as an AEC. Development within the AEC is closely regulated by DCM.
The area was mapped in 1989 as part of the Wetlands Inventory Mapping program. (Map 1B)
'
According to this data, South Creek from the Pamlico River to Deephole Point is classified Estuarine, sub
tidal with mud bottom. From Deephole Point the classification for South Creek and its tributaries changes
to Riverine, tidal with unconsolidated bottom. The wetlands bordering South Creek and its tributaries
generally fall into two classifications. Those wetlands immediately boarding South Creek are Palustrine,
'
emergent, semi -permanent tidal; and those wetlands further inland are Palustrine, scrub or shrub, board -
leaved deciduous or evergreen, semi -permanent tidal. In the upper reaches of the tributaries the
classification is usually Palustrine, forested, broad-leaved or needle -leaved, deciduous or evergreen, and in
a flood subclass that is either permanently, semi -permanently, temporarily, or seasonally flooded. Less than
fifty (50) acres of land bordering South Creek is classified as Upland, non -wetland. Property owners are
required to contact appropriate authorities for review of any proposed use that may affect coastal wetlands.
'
South Creek, itself, covers approximately 2,500 acres. Of this, municipal source point pollution (waste
discharge) impacts about 500 acres of the creek, while non -source point pollution impacts the remainder.
The largest areas impacted by non -source point pollution are as follows:
'
800 acres agricultural run-off
600 acres . - forest run-off
'
200 acres - feed lot run-off
100 acres - urban run-off .
One of the most important factors to consider when determining the suitability of land for future
'
urban development is the possibility of periodic flooding. Land adjacent to South Creek and its tributaries
is subject to flooding during severe storms. Data collected and published by the Army Corps of Engineers
has established the area below the 10-foot contour as being in the 100-year floodplain. This means the
chance of a major flood in any one year is one in one hundred.
'
Approximately two-thirds of the planning area is below the 10-foot contour. This includes most of the
area within the Town limits.. Building restrictions on floor elevation in accordance with the National Flood
Insurance Program exist in these low-lying areas.
Aurora obtains its drinking water from wells tapped into a groundwater source known as the Castle
Hayne Aquifer. This aquifer is also used by the other communities in the region and is the most
productive aquifer in North Carolina. The aquifer is found at common depths of 200 feet and well yields
range from 200 to 500 gallons per minute. Texasgulf is required to pump out large amounts of the water
'
as part of their mining operations. This initially lowered the water table for Aurora and the surrounding

14
area. Groundwater levels have now reached an equilibrium. The amount being withdrawn is the same as
recharge. The maintenance of this balance will help assure an adequate future water supply.
Estuarine waters and shoreline are an additional hydrological feature. These waters are considered
the most productive natural environment in North Carolina. They serve in support and creation of the
commercial and recreational fishing industry.. Circulation patterns in the water serve to transport nutrients,
propel plankton, spread seed, flush animal and plant wastes, and mix fresh and saltwater.
4. Meteorologic Features
Ambient air monitoring in the past has revealed a hot spot of sulfur dioxide in the vicinity of
Texasgulf. Actions have been taken to reduce the concentration. Recent monitoring has not revealed
any violations of acceptable standards.
Other air quality pollutants such as carbon monoxide. lead, ozone, and particulate matter have not
been detected in the Aurora area. The Division of Environmental Management will continue monitoring
these pollutants at stations in Washington and at Texasgulf.

is 2,
Location of AEC's are approximate and are
not suitable for regulatory decisions.
■■■■t� /■■R1■► 4
— NM..
■�r �■■■■■ Ogg 4p�.�■�
12N
AUR 0 R A
Areas of Environmental Concern
and Historic Areas
19-9 0
0 Estuarine Shoreline
Estuarine Waters
SRIM2 Historic Area
® Public Trust Waters
Wetlands
S3 - Town Boundary
Extraterritorial Jurisdictional
Boundary
Railroad.
0 2000 4000
FEET
TMC PREPARATION Of 1017 SUP WAS fb4MCED IM
W PART TMRM A CRAM PROVIDED IT DNC MORTN
CAROLIIA COASIAL MAIACEMEMI PROGRAM, IMROUM
RM 3 PDOVIOCD IT WE COA3IAL ZONE MMACEMEMI ACT Of
• 1072. AS AHMED, 101TCM IS ADNINISIEAID RT Inc
OffICE Of OCLAI AND COASTAL RESOURCE MANACEMMT,
M1IEOIAL OCEANIC AID AINOSPMCRIC ADNIIISSRAIIOM

16
E. EXISTING. LAND USE
The Aurora planning area includes land within the Town's limits and the land -surrounding the Town
a distance of aboutone mile (Maps 3A and 3B). Total area is slightly more than eight square miles, with
only 30 percent being inside the corporate limits. About 12 percent of this land is developed for urban
purposes, the _majority of which is within the incorporated area:
Agricultural land uses cover large portions of total land area, within Aurora's planning jurisdiction.
Crops.most widely grown are potatoes, corn, soybeans, and wheat.
Much of the land adjoining the one mile limit is in forest, with most of these areas lying around
South Creek and the extreme southern and northern areas.
. Aurora is bordered to the North by Bailey Creek which is classified SC (Map 3B) from the railroad
crossing west of Town to South Creek. West of the railroad crossing the stream is classified CSw. South
Creek forms the eastern border of Aurora and is classified SC from Deephole Point upereek almost to SR
1924. From Deephole Point to the Pamlico River the creek is classified SA. All waters in the area are
classified as NSW (Nutrient Sensitive Waters).
The existing land use map shows that .most land uses within the Town limits are residential and
commercial.' Residential development is concentrated in the areas south of NC Highway 33, the blocks
surrounding Main Street, and in the blocks between Main Street and NC Highway 33.
Since 1986, twenty building permits have been issued. Most of these permits have been for
improvements to existing dwellings. Six have been issued for mobile home placement and two for newly
constructed buildings. Most new residential starts are expected.around Grace Drive and south of NC
Highway 33. -Public housing appears to be a new trend, attracting low income persons from surrounding
areas to.locate.in Aurora. Outside the Town's limits, various traffic arteries seem to be catalysts for
housing development. Residential land uses occur along State roads surrounding the Town.
Within the planning area, several concentrations of commercial uses exist. These are located in the
downtown business district, the Fifth Street blocks, and the strip development along NC Highway 33.
The NC Highway 33 corridor serves as a bypass around the Town and has attracted numerous commercial
establishments in the past few years. The block made up by NC Highway 33 to the south, Third Street
to the east, Fifth Street to the west and Main Street to the north has grown into an institutional/office
center. It contains the Town Hall, churches, a dentist's office, a public works facility, a drivers' license
office, a' bank, and a community health center. It is expected that. future commercial, institutional, and
office space needs will. be met in existing commercial areas. Expansion of the NC Highway 33 strip
development is also expected.
Within the Town's jurisdiction, there are.no apparent conflicts between land and water uses. Traffic
ingress and egress from the commercial development along Highway 33 may become a problem. As the
demand for residential and commercial uses increase, the agricultural land along NC Highway 33 may be
exposed to development pressure. The zoning ordinance is designed to prevent land use compatibility
problems in Aurora's jurisdiction. There are no major problems that have resulted from unplanned
development and that have implications for future land and water use.
F. COMMUNITY FACILITIES
1. Existing Plans and Regulations
Aurora presently has the following plans and regulations, in addition to State and regional documents,
that address Aurora's development issues:
1976, 1981, and 1986 Aurora Land Use Plans
• Zoning Ordinance

17 I MAP 3A
V
r st
NC
I
E x i.. s t i n g L a n d u s e t 9 9 0
"Within The Town and Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Boundaries" / .
Residential
Commercial
® Public, quasi —public and
Institutional
Industrial
® Private Recreational
F] Agriculture,Forestland,
WetI-and or Vacant
—' —" Town Boundary
E x t r a t e r r i t o r i a l J u i i s d i c t i o n al
Boundary
` R a i l r o a d NOTE: see Yap 2 tot enIat,ement o! teira
SfRt ,9n
0 2000 4000
�.
FEET
INC PREPARAIION Of INIS NY YAS fXNANCED IM
-
,AAI TMROWh A GRANT PROVIDED 0T INE NORIN -
CAROIINA COASTAL NANAtENIRI Plamm. IRIWUON
iUIOS PROVIDED D7 TNC COASIAL 2011E NYMCCMUIT ACT Or
1072. AS AKEIRIED. YNECN IS ONINISICItCD 0T IKE
OPIICE Of OCEAN AM COASIAL RESOURCE MIAOEVENT.
- -
'7I0NAL OCEANIC AND AINOSPNEAIC ADNINTSIRAIZON -

m

19
• Flood Insurance Program
' Nuisance Ordinances.
These regulations.and plans are kept at the Town Hall, most of which are included in their original
form in the Town's Code of Ordinances. The Code was adopted in 197.7 and is enforced by the building
' inspectors, the Town police, and the zoning administrator. Subdivision regulations have been drafted, but
are not included in the Town's Code of Ordinances or enforced.
Before anyone can develop or alter property within the Town's jurisdiction, they must apply for a
' zoning compliance permit. Uses such as multi -family dwellings, petroleum storage, and clothing
manufacturing require detailed special permits..
The Town has adopted the North Carolina building, plumbing, heating, and electrical codes. Some
inspection services for these codes are performed by Beaufort County officials. Minimum housing standards
' for residential uses apply.
On property for which Town water and/or sewer is available, property owners are expected to tap on
to Town lines. Whenever either is not available, County standards and permits for wells and septic systems
' are required.
A large part of Aurora is in floodplain areas. Finished floor levels for all new structures in these
areas are required to be one foot above the projected 100-year flood elevation. Placement, safety standards,
' and renovation standards for mobile homes are also listed in the Code.
2. Existing Facilities
' Development is often encouraged because of the increased tax base it brings. Eventually, however,
the local government must spend some of its tax dollars to upgrade and expand the existing facilities to
accommodate such growth. The land use planning process allows officials to assess development trends
' and analyze the requirements placed on the community facilities. The following section discusses the
existing conditions of the water and wastewater treatment facilities, the schools, and the roads.
The design capacity of the water system is 288,000 gallons per day and consists of two wells. This
system is currently used at less than 35 percent of its capacity. For the purposes of this plan, an estimate
' of the average usage rate is measured. This is calculated by the total gallons used daily based on the
number of people living in the area using the system. Given the present population and usage rate,
theoretically, the average Aurora water customer utilizes 139 gallons per day (gpd). Assuming this
' theoretical constant usage rate, this system can accommodate approximately 1,300 additional customers.
Any peak load brought on by a population surge could easily be accommodated with the existing facilities.
Additional residential, commercial, and industrial growth equal -to 1,300 persons could occur without
t causing undue ,stress on 'the system.
The sewage treatment system's design capacity is 120 thousand gallons per day. The average use is 90
thousand gpd which represents a 75 percent usage rate. During times of heavy rainfall, the flow rate may
exceed the design capacity; however, with normal operations and the projected population, the system
' should adequately handle Aurora's needs. In order to better handle their current treatment process, the
Town is now planning the addition of a constructed wetlands system. This will probably not add to the
design capacity, but should make the effluent more acceptable to the Division of Environmental
' Management. At the present, about six homes are not connected to the system; however, as their septic
systems fail, they are tapping on. All new construction is required to tap on.
The Town sewer system has recently been altered by a relocation of the point of discharge. There
' are no plans for a major upgrade or expansion of treatment processes.
The school facilities are often an item of concern for the local residents. Aurora's schools, under
the jurisdiction of the Beaufort County School System, include Snowden Elementary and Aurora High
School. The Elementary School is operating at approximately 78 percent of its capacity (Table 5). The

' 20
school was constructed in 1953; the building is currently being air conditioned. The pupil/teacher ratio
is not disproportionately high, which would indicate that existing conditions have not affected the attention
given to each student.
If the school age population increases, contradictory to demographic predictions, the Town will have
to request that the Beaufort County Board of Education construct another facility or an addition to the
' existing structure.
C
C
I
L
1
TABLE 5. Public School Facilities.
PUPIU
ENROLL- TEACHER TEACHER GRADE YEAR
SCHOOL CAPACITY MENT ALLOTMENT RATIO TAUGHT BUILT ADDITIONS
S.W. Snowden
Elementary 650 508 31
Aurora High 350 204 _ 21
School
Source: Interview with Beaufort County School Superintendent, 1990.
*Addition of air conditioning, 1990.
1:14.9 K-8 1938 1953•
1: 9.7 9-12 1954 1976, 87, 90
The high school is currently operating at 58 percent capacity. The original building was constructed
in 1954 with an addition in 1976. A band room was built in 1987 and a vocational building is currently
under construction. The pupil/teacher ratio is considered to be quite good, indicating that no problems
exist with attention being given to each student. This school could accommodate an influx of students
should a population .increase occur.
The Town Sanitation Department provides garbage collection and trash disposal within the Town
limits. Two persons work for this department. Collection takes place two times per week and is deposited
at the Silver Hill landfill fifteen miles away in Pamlico County.
Police service is provided for all persons located within the planning area. The police force consists
of one person and one cruiser. In addition, three Beaufort County Deputies living in the Aurora area
assist in servicing the Community. All have jurisdiction within the Town limits.
The Aurora Fire Department is manned by nearly 25 certified volunteers. The Fire Department
serves the entire Richlands Township, and is funded through a Township tax. The equipment includes
two pumpers, an equipment van, a brush truck, and a tanker. The size of the force can be increased
when needed due to agreements with nearby towns.. In the event of a large fire, other departments can
be called in for firefighting assistance. The Fire Department is constructing a new station along NC 33.
A satellite station is at Edward, located seven miles west of Aurora.
The road system in Town is currently sufficient for any traffic peaks which may occur. The North
Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) estimates that Highway 33 is extremely underutilized.
It is currently used at less than 20 percent of its capacity. It is expected that any additional growth could
be accommodated by the present road system. According to the NC Department of Transportation
Transportation Improvements Program 1986-1995, there are no plans for any major improvements in the
Aurora area. Some secondary roads may become paved under the priority system the Department uses,
but there will be no major improvements made to the roads of the area.

E
.1
21
G. SUMMARY
This section was generated by gathering and analyzing.related data, seeking technical advice from
several state agencies, interviews with local officials and citizens, and working with the Town Planning
Commission.
. The result shows a Town that is experiencing moderate growth and developing in an organized manner
with resources available. The economy could be more varied inasmuch as heavy dependance now rests with
Texasgulf employment. Agriculture, fishing and forestry are also an important part of Aurora's economy.
Natural resources are plentiful and add to the attractiveness of the Town and surroundings. Aurora
is committed to the protection of these valuable resources.
Currently capacity of all facilities and services is adequate and, in some cases, far more than adequate
to meet anticipated growth over the next five years.
H. 1986 POLICY STATEMENTS
An`analysis of current policies must be accomplished before any new policies can be adopted. This
gives planners and local officials an understanding on how well the Town has implemented the 1986
Policies. This section includes an evaluation of the policies addressed in the 1986 Aurora Land Use Plan
update. The Planning Board critiqued these policies at one of its earliest meetings. Each policy was
analyzed for its content, means of enforcement, and implementation strategy. effectiveness.
The Planning Board felt the Town had made a good effort in implementing the policies. Each of
the 1986 policies are listed below with a description of any deficiencies found by the Planning Board.
1. Resource Protection
• Continued participation .in Federal Flood Insurance Program, discourage
development in floodprone areas.
• Support County Health Department decisions on septic tank placement.
• Change zoning to industrial around fuel storage sites.
• Continue to support permit systems for AECs.
• Create conservation buffer zone along public trust waters.
Examination of any suspected archaeological sites before a building permit is
granted.
• Require a vegetative buffer in areas adjoining marsh to control runoff.
• Assist in seeking funds to preserve historic sites.
• Examine potential eagle nesting sites.
• Support groundwater management efforts.
• Discourage activities which dangerously draw down water supply.
• Encourage Mayor to keep informed about the Castle Hayne aquifer.
• Discourage development ofwaterline exporting water outside of Beaufort County.
• Support Countywide water system that would help Texasgulf remove excess water.
• Support alternative waste disposal systems.
• Improve Town sewage treatment plant.
• Encourage residents to hook onto Town's wastewater treatment system.
• Control stormwater runoff.
• Encourage riparian vegetation.
• Development next to AECs must not violate water quality standards.
• Limit impervious surfaces to 15% within 100 feet of shoreline.
C

2.
lea
• Support marinas in vicinity of two canals.
• Discourage floating homes.
• Allow marinas that are designed not to violate water quality standards.
• Discourage industrial location in and around fragile areas.
• Discourage industry near wetlands.
• Industries which produce toxic or hazardous substances will not be located near
surface waters or groundwater recharge areas.
Resource Production and Management
• Permit development on prime farmland areas.
• Encourage use of Best Management Practices on all cultivated land.
• Require special use permits for mining activities within planning jurisdiction.
• Protect commercial and recreational fishing areas.
• Establish conservation zone along water and marsh's edge.
• Register off -road vehicles at Town Hall.
• Prohibit off -road vehicles in vegetative buffer zone.
3. Economic and Community Development .
• Encourage industry that takes advantage of natural resource base and existing labor
supply.
• Encourage low pollution, light manufacturing industry.
• Encourage low wastewater producing industry.
• Encourage seafood related industry to locate in northeastern quadrant of Town.
• Encourage industry which employs low -skilled workers, particularly women.
• Industrial sites will be confined to areas zoned manufacturing.
• Developed areas then Transition will receive priority on new services.
• Service residential customers first.
• Examine industrial users on case -by -case basis.
• Limit growth to 1,500 persons.
• Maintain urban growth patterns consistent with zoning ordinance.
• Continued support of downtown beautification efforts.
• Permit redevelopment following a major storm in accordance with zoning
ordinance.. Non -conforming uses will not be permitted.
• Support redevelopment of substandard housing.
• Support State and Federal. programs that assist Town's economic development.
• Oppose expansion of military airspace.
• Support channel maintenance and financial aid when available. Efforts will be
made. to secure spoils sites.
• Discourage support of energy generating facilities.
• Support continued efforts to increase tourism and river access.
• Continue to enforce subdivision ordinance.
• Continue with efforts to upgrade sewage treatment plant.
• Ensure that growth is consistent with Resource Protection and Management
Policies, zoning ordinance, and additional goals of the Town.

. . '«
23
Town officials felt that the 1986 policies were very strong particularly in the Resource Protection
section. The policies achieved the overall goal of protecting water quality and, at the same time, allowing
for economic development. The Town Board did not want to support any new issues that would not be
obtainable with Aurora's small staff.
The policies that received the most attention were the ones dealing with upgrading the wastewater
treatment plant. The Town completed the extension of the discharge line into the middle of South Creek.
This effort allowed for the removal of the growth moratorium which restricted new sewer connections.
The Board felt that the 1986 Plan was an outstanding effort at resource protection for a community
the size of Aurora. They agreed that many of these policies should be continued for another five years.
Revisions will primarily reflect changes in regulations.
1
1
1
1
1

' III. 1991 POLICY STATEMENTS
The formulation of policy statementsis the most important part of any land use plan. Policies must
' find a balance between growth management and environmental protection. The Inventory and Analysis
section which included existing conditions and future needs and the review of 1986 policies served as a
prelude to this section.
Land use plans prepared under guidelines established by the Coastal Resources Commission require,
at a minimum, policies that consider: Resource Protection, Resource Production and Management,
Economic and Community Development, Public Participation, and Storm Hazard Mitigation. Each policy
must be workable with all other policies. The guidelines are applicable to all twenty Coastal counties.
' Certain issues do not apply to the Town of Aurora, such as maritime forests, pocosins, outstanding resource
waters (ORW) and the development of sound and estuarine system islands to mention a few, therefore,
policy discussions are omitted in this Plan.
' The following section represents the Town of Aurora's best effort at adopting policies for the next
five years. Each policy is realistic for Aurora.
1 A. RESOURCE PROTECTION
Aurora recognizes the need to protect its natural and cultural resources. It is understood that these
' are an irreplaceable asset which require protection. Often, these resources represent an economic return
to the area's residents through their exploitation. It is in the best interest of all citizens of eastern North
Carolina that these resources be protected and managed to their highest potential.
' The natural and cultural resources of the Aurora area have been identified in the Inventory and
Analysis section of this plan. Development should not occur at the expense of the natural system.
Conversely, the Town feels development should not be impaired by the characteristics of the natural
system.. For these reasons, development should be targeted to areas where it is not likely to jeopardize
or be jeopardized by the natural system. The following section details the issues concerned with
development and its relationship with the ecosystem.
1. Development in Areas with Constraints
The constraints to development in Aurora were discussed in the preceding section and relate to
both physical constraints and limitations of community facilities. Physical constraints include man-made
fuel storage areas, high hazard flood zones, Military Operating Airspace and areas with soil limitations.
All of the soils in the Aurora planning area are not well suited for the safe placement of septic tanks.
No soils are extremely hazardous to building foundations. The Town recognizes the importance of safe
septic tank placement to prevent groundwater and well contamination and also realizes its inability to
change or correct the characteristics of the soil.
.Fuel storage facilities are located along Highway 33 west of Town. The Town acknowledges that any
adjacent development would be subject to a fire risk and well contamination from tank seepage.. Also at
risk is development located .within the floodplain of South Creek.. Water from the 100-year flood would
inundate about two-thirds of.the. land in Town (Map 4). Since most of.the Town is subject to flooding,
it is not realistic that all development should be prohibited from these areas.
24

1
' 25
Policy Alternatives
' Possible policy.alternatives for growth management and development in areas with identified constraints
include
• Redrafting of subdivision regulations to include stricter design standards.
• Develop and adopt additional regulations in a flood damage prevention ordinance and
zoning ordinance to regulate or prohibit all development in areas with physical constraints.
Permit development in those areas, utilizing current State, Federal, and local regulatory
'
processes, i.e.. CAMA, flood. insurance, subdivision regulations and Corps of Engineers
404 permitting system.
tPolicy
Choices
• Aurora recognizes the inevitability of some development occurring in high hazard flood
areas due to the prevalence of flood -prone land in the area. Therefore, the Town will
continue to participate in National Flood Insurance Program and promote enforcement
through the County Building Inspection Program. Proposed large-scale developments,
such as housing subdivisions and industry, will be discouraged from locating in the flood
'
prone area.
• The Town recognizes that it is unable to change the condition of the soils to accommodate
development. It will continue to support the County Health Department and its decisions
on septic tank placement. Aurora will continue to support regulations which decide
where construction can occur based on soil characteristics.
• Only industrial land uses will be encouraged around the fuel storage sites.
'
Implementation Strategies
• The Town should review the zoning ordinance to insure compliance with adopted policies.
'
Areas, of the Town within flood zones will :be reviewed for conforming uses.
• The Town should consider. the adoption of Subdivision Regulations.
'
2-. Areas of Environmental Concern Develo mcnt
Aurora recognizes that a primary concern of the Coastal Resources Commission (CRC) is to protect
'
our coastal resources, especially Areas of Environmental Concern (AECs). The Town also shares this
concern for the protection and sound management of these environmentally sensitive lands and waters.
The AECs in the Aurora planning area were identified in the Inventory and Analysis section of this plan
'
and include estuarine waters, the estuarine shoreline, public trust waters, and coastal wetlands.
Aurora shares the State's policy and management objective for the estuarine system "to give the
highest priority to the protection and coordinated management of these areas so as to safeguard and
'
perpetuate their biological, socio-economic and aesthetic values and to ensure that development occurring
within these AECs is compatible with natural characteristics so as to minimize the likelihood of significant
loss of private property and public resources" (15 NCAC 7H. 0203). In accordance with this.overall
objective, Aurora will permit those land uses which conform to the general use standards of the North

26
Carolina Administrative Code (15 NCAC 7H) for development within the estuarine system. The
' maintenance of the AECs is considered to be a top priority by the Town.
Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) are not present in the Aurora planning area. Policies will be
considered when the ORWs become an issue.
' Policy, Alternatives
' Continue to utilize the NCAC guidelines for permitted .uses in AECs.
• Prohibit all development in AECs.
• Establish 75-foot conservation buffer zone from water or marsh's edge where no
development shall be permitted. Classify this area as "Conservation" according to Land
IClassification system.
Poficy Choices
• The Town of Aurora will continue to utilize the current system for permitted uses in all
AECs taking advantage of State permit and review processes.
• The Town will take added precautions by continuing to use a 75-foot conservation buffer
zone adjacent to the public trust waters where coastal wetlands do not exist. In this buffer
zone only those uses will be allowed that are allowed in coastal wetlands. This buffer
zone is intended to be a device of the local government to show added protection for the
' resource. To function most effectively, disturbance of this buffer should be kept to an
absolute minimum, leaving natural tree and shrub vegetation intact to hold soil, increase
infiltration, and slow and filter runoff. This area will remain'in the jurisdiction of the
' Town and will preclude all forms of development, except for several restricted uses. These
areas are ideal for natural areas and/or parks.
' Implementation Strategies
• Current State permit and review processes will be employed to determine viable
development types in AECs.
' The land classification system will restrict development within the buffer zone.
3. Other Fragile Areas
In addition to the AECs, other fragile areas in Aurora warrant special considerations. These fragile
areas include those covered directly by State and Federal authorities and those requiring local. attention.
These include undesignated primary nursery areas, archaeological sites listed by the North Carolina
Department of Cultural Resources, historic structures listed on the State and National Registers of Historic
Places, freshwater swamps, marshes, maritime forests, pocosins, 404 wetlands, ORW areas, shellfishing
I
waters, water supply areas, other waters of special values and manmade hazards. The Aurora area is also
known locally to serve as a habitat for the endangered American Bald Eagle.

27.
A significant archaeological site has been located in the vicinity of Whitehurst Creek on the fringes
of the planning area. The NC Department of Cultural Resources made several recommendations for
management of these prehistoric sites: effective treatment of known or discovered archaeological sites
may be accomplished through survey, mitigative recovery of significant data, avoidance or preservation in
place. Efforts will also be made to provide recognition and protection through such means as the
National Register of Historic Places, if appropriate, . and through adherence to regulatory programs
administered by the North Carolina Division of Archives and History. The Town recognizes the historical
and scientific importance of this archaeological site and is committed to preserving the valuable
information. it may contain.
Several historically significant structures are located in the planning area and the downtown area for
their unique architectural style. The Town recognizes that the historical integrity of the Town is a part
of its heritage. All efforts should be taken to preserve this bit of history. According to the Deputy State
Historic Preservation Officer, these areas "are potentially eligible for inclusion in the National Register of
Historic Places."
The nursery areas in South Creek and its tributaries are critical for the full development of several
species of fish. Protection of these nursery areas is a high priority for the Town. Adjoining the nursery
areas are swamps, marshes, and wetlands. These low-lying areas act as flushing agents, protecting nursery
areas from stormwater runoff. The swamps are also wildlife habitats for a variety of species.
The Aurora area also houses several endangered American Bald Eagles. The need for the protection
of these predators is widely recognized. The protection of these resources is of such importance that no
real alternatives exist except to offer protection for the nesting sites if they are located.
Outstanding Resource Waters, shellfishing waters, maritime forests, and pocosins are. not within the
Aurora planning area. Policies are not needed for these issues at this time.
Policy Alternatives
As with the AECs, these fragile areas are of such importance that no reasonable alternatives exist
but to offer protection for these sites. The amount of protection is.reflected.in these policy alternatives:
• Prohibit development over archaeological sites listed by NC Department of Cultural
Resources.
• Acknowledge that nursery areas are critical to the local economy and work to limit runoff
into them by prohibiting development in swamps and wetlands.
• Develop a program of "donating" historic properties to the Town and work to set up an
historic district.
• If an eagle nesting site is determined, . a thorough examination of the site must be
conducted by the NC Wildlife Resources Commission.
• Discourage development in all fragile areas.
• Protect all wetlands, swamps and marshes.
Policy Choices
• If an archaeological site is identified, a thorough investigation must be conducted by NC
Department of Cultural Resources before any building Permit is granted.
• Require a vegetative buffer from marsh or water's edge to limit amount of runoff entering
nursery areas.
• Encourage preservation of historic sites by providing Town assistance in locating funds
for historic preservation efforts.
• If an eagle nesting site is determined, a thorough examination of the site must be
conducted by the NC Wildlife Resources Commission.

28
• Implement changes in the zoning ordinance to limit land use choices in wetlands, swamps and
marshes.
Implementation Strategies
' Work with building permits officer to require thorough investigation of site before permit
is granted.
• Continue. to classify areas within 75 feet of marsh's edge and water line as "Conservation"
' on land classification map.
• Review zoning ordinance for necessary changes.
4. Hurricane and Flood Evacuation
This section received special attention in Section III E. of this Plan. Because of Aurora's flat, low
topography, flooding is a problem during hurricanes and severe storms. Map 4 shows that even in Level
1 and 2 hurricanes, approximately 50% of the Town will experience flooding, and the evacuation route
(Route 33 North) will be covered from the bridge at South Creek west for about 2000 feet. A Level 4
' and 5 hurricane will totally flood Aurora.
Highway 33 has more than adequate capacity to handle the evacuation needs for Aurora, the
surrounding areas and the employees at Texasgulf within the twelve hour warning time period provided by
the National Weather Service.
' There are no alternatives.
Policy Choice
• Preparation of an Evacuation Plan consistent with the Beaufort County Plan.
'
Implementation Strategy
• Adhere to plan designated by Beaufort County and other procedures adopted by the Town
Council.
5. Means of Protection of Potable Water
'
The availability of potable water is a critical concern because of the large drawdown resulting from
nearby phosphate mining operations. There are no alternatives other than protection of the water. The
Town recognizes the importance of the limited regional supply of groundwater and the need for its
protection.
'
Policy Choices
• Discourage activities which dangerously draw down the water supply.
• Encourage the Town Planning Board to keep informed about the availability and quality
'
of water from the Castle Hayne Aquifer.
1

E
1
E
F
29
Implementation Strategy
• Continue to support the Division of Environmental Management Groundwater Section
efforts to protect water in the Aurora Use Area.
6. Use of Packaee Treatment Plants
Soils are largely unsatisfactory for the safe placement of septic tanks in the planning area. Most soils
are too wet. Unless care is exercised, this could present problems for the health and safety of area
residents. Unsatisfactory performance of soils around septic tanks could contaminate groundwater wells.
The Town recognizes that it has little power over the soils. Because of these restrictions, little can be
done for policy. The optimal solution would be to have all area residents connected to the municipal
wastewater treatment plant, or encourage the use of package treatment plants in suitable situations. Given
Aurora's poor soils for septic tanks, a central sewage treatment facility is very important, and package
treatment plants offer developers an alternative that would allow them to limit lot size and reduce costs.
These systems require special care and monitoring by State and local regulators.
Policy Alternatives
• Require larger than average lot sizes.
• Where use of septic tanks is unavoidable, Town supports implementation of techniques
to improve the efficiency of septic tanks, i.e., mound systems and waterless systems.
• Any septic tank installation application must meet State and County regulations.
• Encourage everyone in "developed" and "transition" zones to connect to the Town's
wastewater treatment facility.
• Support the use of package treatment systems in rural and community areas.
Policy Choices
• Where the use of septic tanks is unavoidable, the Town supports the implementation of
techniques to improve the efficiency of septic tanks, i.e., mound systems and waterless
systems.
• All septic tank applications must pass requirements set forth by the Beaufort County
Health Department.
• When able, Aurora will require residents of "developed" and "transition" areas, as shown
on the Town's Land Classification Map, to hook on to the wastewater treatment facility.
• Allow the use of package treatment plants where feasible and practical.
Implementation Strategies
• Enforcement will remain the responsibilities of the Building Inspector and the County
Health Department, which grants permits for septic tanks.
• Continue to work with the Division of Environmental Management to improve the
wastewater treatment facility.

30
7. Stormwater Runoff
'
Non -point source pollution is considered a high priority for the Town of Aurora:. The amount of
fertilizers, pesticides, oil contaminants, and litter which eventually enter the river system is increased
significantly by a heavy rain. The marshes and other wetlands located along creeks and rivers offer a water
'
filtering system that works naturally to sift out or uptake any pollutants before they can enter the system.
Stormwater runoff contributes to the water quality problems often discussed by commercial fishermen and
recreational boaters in the Aurora area. Several days after a heavy rainfall, a fish kill occasionally occurs
in the creeks and Pamlico River. Blame for the kill can be largely placed on the bottom water anoxia
resulting from stormwater runoff. Stormwater runoff and flooding problems are connected and often
aggravated by the same land use practices.
The Town has selected policy options to mitigate stormwater runoff. Several techniques that have
been proven effective in slowing down runoff are costly and because of the limited amount of funds
available for this issue, the methods must be passive. Aurora has decided to work to solve this problem
by continuing to utilize the natural system for passive control of non -point source pollution.
'
Several methods are effective in minimizing the creation of runoff. It can be done throughout the
Town by minimizing impervious surfaces, draining streets and parking lots to grassed swales, and
maintaining or planting as many trees and shrubs as possible to maximize evapotranspiration. The Town
has found that land uses will be reviewed within 75 feet of the surface waters (through the DCM
permitting system for estuarine shoreline AEC and the Town's established 75-foot vegetative buffer zone)
and the review process should consider the effects of runoff in judging what uses will be allowed.
Policy Choices
Control, treat, and mitigate any stormwater runoff in Town.
Encourage development and maintenance of riparian vegetation.
Development adjacent to AEC must be designed so that runoff will not violate water
.quality standards.
Limit impervious surfaces to 15 percent within 100 feet of the shoreline.
Implementation Strategies
Continue to employ efforts of the CAMA permitting system and the Army Corps of
Engineers 404 permitting system in determining development types which do not violate
water quality.
Development in Conservation zone will be reviewed on a case -by -case basis by the Town
Planning Board.
Regulate land uses within conservation buffer zone.
& Marina. Floatine Home. and Dry Stack Development
Marinas are an essential convenience for boaters. Economically, they may benefit a Town through
slip rental, repairs, and gasoline sales. Ecologically, marinas may degrade the water in which they are
located. Aurora currently has a publicly -owned boat ramp and a private marina. Dry stack storage takes
the boats out of the water. This permits.a reduction in the number of slips in the water. Floating homes
are not currently regulated by any agency. The possibility of water pollution can make these homes an
environmental risk.

31
Policy Alternatives
'
Encourage the development of marinas.
• Discourage the development of marinas and location of floating homes in light of their
'
contribution to water quality, degradation.
Policy Choices
• Support marina and dry stack development exclusively in the vicinity of the two canals.
• Discourage floating homes because of their negative impact. on water quality.
• Allow marinas, but encourage their design and size not to violate water quality standards
'
and the integrity of coastal wetlands.
Implementation Strategics
'
Continue working with zoning ordinance, CAMA, and 404 permitting systems in regulating
siting of marinas.
• The Town Planning Board will examine each marina and dry stack development request
'
on a case -by -case basis.
' 9. Industrial Impacts Around Fragile Areas
The policies above address development of all types in and around fragile areas. Industry, another
form of development, should be exposed to no different standards than the other types of development.
' In any location decision, the industry must comply with the policies stated above.
It has been demonstrated that the Town wants to mitigate the effects of all development on its natural
and cultural resources. It wants to make all efforts to try to protect these resources. Therefore, in an
effort to maintain consistency in the policies, the Town must work toward attracting economic growth
' while encouraging the protection of the environment.
Policy Choices
' Location of industries in and around fragile areas shall be discouraged, except
water -dependent industries, i.e., commercial fishing.
' Industry shall be discouraged near wetlands.
• Industries which produce toxic or hazardous substances including fertilizer operations will
not be located near surface waters or groundwater recharge areas.
'
Implementation Strategics
• Continue support of CAMA and 404 permitting systems, Building Inspector and County
Building Requirements.
• The Town Planning Board and Town Council will review each application for siting of
industries on a case -by -case basis.
t

32
10. Sound and Estuarine System Islands
' Aurora has no estuarine or sound islands; therefore, no policy will be considered.
11. Areas Affected by a Five-foot Rise in Sea Level
Water levels change over time. Any rise in sea level will inundate areas in the Aurora planning area
that are currently developed or may be developed in the future. Preparation for this event requires
'
looking at current land uses. and projections.
'
Policy Alternatives
Locate hazardous development outside of low-lying areas.
• Locate all development outside low-lying areas.
• Do not restrict development in low-lying areas.
Policy Choice
'
Locate hazardous development, which includes fertilizer plants, outside of areas that may be
affected by a five-foot rise in sea level.
Implementation Strategy
• Update zoning ordinance to make necessary changes in industrial permitted uses.
12. Upland Excavation for Marina Basins
'
According to CAMA standards, the highest preference for marina development site alternatives is "an
upland site requiring no alteration of wetlands or other estuarine .habitats and having adequate water
circulation to prevent the accumulation of sediment and pollutants in boat basins and channels."
Policy Alternatives
Allow upland sites requiring dredging only.
'
• Allow deepwater sites located away from primary nursery areas and requiring no excavation.
'
Policy Choice
The Town will restrict marina basins in accordance with State standards.
'
Implementation Strategy
• Enforce local zoning ordinance and require compliance with State standards.

' 33
13. Damage to Existing Marshes by Bulkhead Installation .
' Aurora is bordered to the north and east by a combination of wetlands and marshes extending
landward almost 1000 feet in most places. Most of these locations are not suitable for development.
Bulkheads and other shoreline stabilization methods must meet standards listed in Title 15, Subchapter 7H
' Section .0208(b)(7) of the North Carolina Administrative Code. Among these standards is a requirement
that bulkheads must be constructed landward of significant marsh areas. Bulkheads constructed within a
marsh interfere with the natural exchange of inflow of tidal nutrients and outwash of pollutants.
Policy Alternatives
• The Town may choose to preserve the marshes and allow no bulkheads.
• The Town may wish to protect the marshes by controlling bulkhead development in such a
way as to minimize negative impacts.
Policy Choice
• The Town's policy shall be to protect the marshes by carefully controlling bulkhead
development.
Implementation Strategy
• The Town will support the enforcement of existing State and Federal regulations.
B. RESOURCE PRODUCTION AND MANAGEMENT
Appropriate management of productive resources is very important to any locality. In most cases,
the productive resources are intricately tied to the economic fabric of the area. It is, therefore, wise to
manage these resources to the best of their productivity and to ensure their existence for future
generations. The major productive resources in Aurora are related to agriculture, mining and commercial
and recreational fisheries and commercial forestry.
1. Productive Agricultural Land
Agriculture, as discussed. in the Inventory and Analysis section of this plan, is an important component
of the local economy. Farming brings in a great amount of income to the area through the actual sale
of farm commodities, farm supplies and equipment. A large portion of the planning area is currently or
has been under cultivation. The Soil Conservation Service has identified and mapped the soils in the
planning area which are considered to be some of the best in the County for agricultural productivity.
These soils occupy, a large amount of land in the planning area.
In principal, the Town could opt to conserve these farm soils for future use by restricting any
development from occurring on them. Aurora realizes how important agriculture is to the economy,
but it feels that there is an excess of land under cultivation already. This glut in farmland, and
subsequently, farm products, has caused- farm prices to fall and foster economic hardship for the family
farmer. Programs, such as the Payment In -Kind, pay farmers to take their land out of production. The

.1
Town feels that it should not contribute to an already bad problem by requiring that certain agricultural
soils be restricted from any other uses.
Policy Alternatives
• Protect agricultural lands identified as "prime" by the SCS and. Division of Soil and Water
Conservation.
• Prohibit any land use other than agriculture, forestry or conservation on prime agricultural
soils.
• Promote conservation of these lands by encouraging owners of these tracts to implement
Best Management Practices.
• Classify lands as Conservation -A, meaning that these are agricultural areas which should
be precluded from development.
• Take no additional measures to preserve agricultural lands.
Policy Choices
• The Town will not take additional measures to encourage the preservation of "prime"
agricultural soils. Any types of development, pending consistency with the zoning
ordinance, will be permitted on these soils.
• Encourage owners of these lands labelled as "prime" and other cultivated areas to
implement Best Management Practices.
Implementation Strategy
• Continue to work with Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service and Soil
Conservation Service workers in getting farmers to adopt Best Management Practices.
2 Existing and Potential Mineral Production Areas
Open -pit mining has been the economic mainstay of Aurora and Beaufort County since the Texasgulf
mining operations came to this County in 1965. The environmental and economic effects of the
phosphate mining have been witnessed by Aurora area residents. Peat mining has also become an issue
within recent years; but there are currently no known "prime" sites for peat mining in the Aurora area.
All peat soils are low BTU and would be uneconomical to mine at this time.
In 1981, a policy was adopted which discouraged open pit mining within the one -mile extraterritorial
area of Town. Any mining activities proposed were required to apply for a special use permit which was
to be granted on a case -by -case basis. The Town has decided that this policy is still applicable.
Policy Choice `
• The Town discourages any type of open -pit mining within the one -mile jurisdictional limit
of Town. Any mining activities proposed must apply fora special use permit which will
.be granted on a case -by -case basis.
CI!

' ! 35
Implementation Strategics
' Continued review process of applications for special use permits by the Town Planning
Board.
• Support State regulations on mining industry.
3. Commercial and Recreational Fisheries
'
The commercial fishing industry is vital to the local economy. Several independent full-time
commercial fishermen live and work in the Aurora area, plus four crab processing plants are located in
or near the planning area. South Creek and its tributaries also serve as nursery areas for several species.
'
Concern has been raised by commercial fishermen and the Division of Marine Fisheries technicians about
the effect of runoff on the fisheries industries. Freshwater runoff from drainage ditches and non -point
source pollution has been detrimental to the fishing waters by altering the salinity content and adding
'
pollutants to the estuarine system. Concern has also been raised over incidences of fecal coliform, largely
from septic tank seepage, being identified in shellfish beds in other parts of the State. In order to support
the commercial and recreational fishing industries, the Town needs to implement techniques to maintain
water quality.
'
To remain consistent with the aforementioned Resource Protection policies, the Town has elected to
protect the fisheries. Although the Division of Environmental Management has not designated any waters
close to Aurora as Outstanding Resource Waters, the Town has chosen to protect the commercial and
'
recreational fishing areas within the Town's jurisdiction and to take special care in protecting the nursery
areas and other waters in the South Creek system. Trawling activities are not currently conducted within
Aurora's jurisdiction. Policies are not needed at this time.
'
Policy Choice
• The Town will protect commercial and recreational fisheries areas within the Town's
'
jurisdiction. Also, those areasunofficially recognized by the Division of Marine Fisher-
ies as significant resource areas will be treated as such. These include all tributaries of
'
South Creek.
Implementation Strategies
The CAMA and 404 permitting systems, as well as the Town's zoning ordinance will
'
provide sufficient enforcement for this policy.
• The County Health Department, largely responsible for the safe placement of septic tanks,
'
will be responsible for minimizing the likelihood of contamination of fishing waters from
the effluent of septic systems in unsuitable soils.
'
4. Commercial Forest Lands
Commercially -owned forest lands cover several tracts in the Aurora area. In addition, timber
companies have harvesting rights on tracts of land owned by Texasgulf. This natural and renewable
resource provides jobs, an aesthetic quality to the area, a natural habitat for wildlife, and improved air
quality. Forestry activities utilize the same resources as farming and mining.

36
Policy Alternatives
'
Support forestry industry in Aurora area.
Discourage forestry activities that includes clear -cutting.
'
• Encourage use of Best Forestry Management Practices. ,
Support retention of buffer adjoining marshland and water bodies.
Policy Choices
'
Support forest industry provided Best Forestry Management Practices are used and a
buffer is retained along water bodies:
• Encourage reseeding of existing forested areas with natural growth trees.
Implementation Strategy
gY
'
Continue to work with the Extension Service, Soil Conservation Service, and NC Forest
Service in their efforts to encourage good forest management.
' S. Off -Road Vehicles
The mention of "off -road' vehicles in coastal North Carolina, typically conjures ideas of four-wheel
' drive type vehicles driving up and down the sandy beaches of the ocean front. In Aurora, there is no
problem with these vehicles operating on the beaches. They most often operate illegally along the
roadsides, frequently causing significant amounts of soil and vegetation loss, plus creating a nuisance from
' their noise. Many local residents have expressed a concern over these vehicles, ranging from complaints
about noise to legitimate questions about their safety.
The Town is able to do very little to prohibit these vehicles, as they are most frequently operated on
' private property.
Policy Alternatives
• Require that all off -road vehicle owners register their property at the Town Hall at the
time of vehicle registration.
• Prohibit the use.of these vehicles from the planning area.
' Restrict their. use to areas classified as "Rural."
• Discourage use of off --road vehicles in planning area.
Policy Choices
' The Town requires that all off --road vehicle owners register their property. at the Town
• Hall at the time of vehicle registration.
' Prohibit use of four-wheel vehicles in the vegetative buffer zone established 75 feet from
waters edge.

'
37 ,
1
-
Implementation Strategies
'
Cooperation with Town employees during time of vehicle registration.
• Work with Town Policemen to enforce this policy.
C. ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
'
The analysis of the present conditions of the population and economy of the Aurora planning area
revealed no alarming changes in the general economic atmosphere of the area. Aurora is very concerned
about future growth in economic and community development. Since Texasgulf s location to the area in
1965, the Town has had the potential for explosive growth. An immediate increase in population was
spurred by Texasgulf, but in proportion, this growth represented a small number of persons. Most
Texasgulf employees live . in other counties and towns in eastern North Carolina. Aurora serves as a
part-time convenience center for the Texasgulf employees.
'
Aurora, as discussed -in the Inventory and Analysis section of this plan, is currently not undergoing
large amounts of growth like some other eastern North Carolina cities. It is, therefore, not experiencing
the same levels of development pressure as other towns. Several factors have been suggested for this
'
stunted growth: lack of adequate housing, lack of recreational facilities, poor schools, limited retail
opportunity, and lack of full-time pastors in the church facilities. Whatever the reason, or combination
of reasons, the potential exists for an explosion of growth in Aurora. Policies need to be in place to
accommodate this growth, when it occurs.
The Town views itself as being in a position to accommodate growth and development. Consistent
with the aforementioned policies, the Town is pro -growth as long as the development is not
environmentally degrading. The limitations imposed by the Town's policies on the protection of sensitive
'
natural and cultural resources should not be violated in order to accommodate any type of growth.
Residential, commercial and industrial land uses should meet the goals of the Town. The following section
outlines growth policies which have an impact on land use decisions. These policies define the goals
'
Aurora has set for where it would like -to be in the next ten years. Particular issues, related to growth and
the Town's commitment to economic development, are discussed below.
'
1. Location Types Industries Desired
and of
Aurora, as discussed in the preceding section, is blessed with several natural and cultural resources.
'
It sits on one of the world's largest phosphate deposits; is situated on South Creek; and has some of the
County's.most productive agricultural soils.
Manufacturing in the area takes advantage of these resources. The phosphate mining industry, one
'
of the largest operations in eastern North Carolina, employs about 1,200 persons. Three seafood
processing operations are located within a five mile radius of the area. Farming is also an economic
activity in the region, employing dozens of persons through farm labor or. through the sale of farming
equipment and supplies.
'
Aurora encourages the continued development or expansion of these types of resource -intensive
industries. Aurora would also like to invite industry which takes advantage of the abundant supply of
low -skilled workers. In particular, there is an abundant supply of low -skilled female workers. Expansion
of the phosphate mining operations, additional seafood processing industries or light assembly

38
manufacturing would be welcome in Aurora. A sewing factory, or similar activity, could provide
employment for the low -skilled female workers in the area.
All industries considering locating in the Aurora planning area must be low -pollution, light
manufacturing industries in order to remain consistent with the aforementioned resource policy statements.
All industries must .be consistent with the Town's policies to protect its water quality and wetlands.
Several sites are.available in the planning area for industry. The Town would like to see industry
locate in two specific sites. The northeastern quadrant, currently undeveloped, would be well suited for
a seafood processing firm or some other type of water oriented. industry. Another area, along Highway
33 west of Town is zoned for industry.. The Town feels that this site would be best suited to all other
industrial types. It has good access and is currently served by the water and sewer system.
Policy Choices
• Encourage industry types which take advantage of the natural resource base and existing
labor supply.
• Encourage low -pollution, light manufacturing type industries which are compatible with
resource protection, production and management goals and policies.
• Encourage low waste industries to prevent contributing to wastewater treatment problems.
• Encourage seafood -related industries to locate in northeastern quadrant of Town, providing
they are consistent with resource protection goals of the Town.
• Encourage industry which employs low -skilled workers, particularly women. Assembly -type
manufacturing and a garment factory would be well suited for this purpose.
• Industrial sites will be confined to areas zoned for manufacturing along Highway 33 and
.in .the northeastern section of Town.
Implementation Strategies
• The Town will establish more active contact with the State's industrial development
representative for the region, making certain that the representative is aware of the
Town's stated policy choices on economic development.
• Zoning ordinance, CAMA and 404 permitting systems will regulate the development of
industry in specific areas.
Z Commitment to Providing Services
The Town is committed to providing wastewater treatment to any potential customer. The limiting
factors are the cost of line extension and the plant capacity. Currently less then 300 additional customers
could use the system.. This is not a problem for anticipated residential growth, but could be for a large
user. The Town does not have the financial resources to extend lines to sparsely populated areas.
Currently, nearly 100 percent of the area's residents are hooked up to the water system. This
represents a 35 percent usage rate for that facility. Nearly 1,350 more persons could be served by this
system.
0

39
Aurora acknowledges that the region's soils are not conducive to septic tank usage and the optimal
solution to this problem is to provide wastewater treatment service to all residents in the planning area.
'
This is a very expensive and currently infeasible proposition.
Aurora is committed to providing basic services to serve increased development in the area. Industrial
requests will be examined on an individual basis. In this issue, there are no alternatives; it is more of a
questionof scale.
Policy Choices
'
First priority in delivery of services is to areas classified as "Developed" on the Land
Classification map. Second priority is to "Transition" areas.
• Residential customers will be served first.
'
Industrial uses will be examined on a case -by -case basis by the Town Council and Planning
Board.
3. Desired Urban Growth Patterns
In 1981, considerable debate was held over the anticipated growth rates and size of Aurora. It was
'
decided at that time to limit the population, no matter what trends might take place. Town officials
decided that 1,500 persons is a good limit, based on the design capacities of the water and sewer systems.
Aurora's 1990 population is one-half of this intended goal. Projected population figures suggest that the
slow, but steady growth rates that Aurora has experienced in the past will continue for the next ten years.
Another trend in the planning area which may affect urban growth patterns is the increasing number
of mobile homes scattered throughout residential areas.
'
Policy Alternatives
• Limit growth to 1,500 persons. Urban patterns will be limited by zoning ordinance.
'
Consider developing zoning ordinance exclusively for mobile homes.
• Urban growth patterns will remain consistent with zoning ordinance.
'
Policy . Choice
• Limit growth to 1,500 persons. Urban patterns will be limited by zoning ordinance.
'
Implementation Strategy
Urban growth patterns and densities will be limited, the County Health Department, and
the zoning ordinance.
4. Redevelopment of Developed Areas
The Town of Aurora's policy on redevelopment of developed land was discussed in the 1981 and 1986
land use plan updates. At that time, the Town was concerned mainly with improving local tourism
through several redevelopment projects. The Aurora Library, Community Center, Fossil Museum, Civic
Center, and marina were projects associated with this community facilities development program. The
establishment of these facilities are proof of the Town's commitment to redevelopment

40
of older areas. Downtown revitalization has been encouraged for the past several years, but a limited
amount of progress has been made toward this goal. The Town still feels committed to this effort.
'
About two-thirds of the Town would be wiped out in the event of a devasting storm. In this case, all
structures would be rebuilt to conform to the land use types according to the zoning ordinance. All
non -conforming uses would not be permitted for reconstruction.
Erosion is not.a problem in the Aurora area due to its low topography.
Policy Choices
• Continue support of downtown beautification efforts. The Town will work to help secure
funds for rehabilitation projects.
• In the event of destruction by a storm, redevelopment will occur in accordance with
'
the prescribed land uses of the zoning ordinance. Non -conforming uses will not be
permitted.
• The Town supports the replacement of substandard housing with standard housing within
'
the Town limits.
• Encourage the removal of dilapidated buildings in downtown area.
• Reconstruction will be permitted on lots that meet minimum size standards.
'
Implementation Strategies
'
• The Town will coordinate with private individuals and organizations to secure financial
support for downtown beautification efforts.
• The Town will consider the feasibility of applying for appropriate grants to assist with
redevelopment. Grant programs that could be utilized include the Community
Development Block Grant for Community Revitalization, Economic Development and
Urgent Needs; Farmers Home Administration; Economic Development Administration's
Sudden and Severe Damage program; and North Carolina's water and sewer grants
'
programs.
S. Commitment to State and Federal Programs
The Town of Aurora is receptive to State and Federal Programs which provide improvements to the
Town. Aurora will continue to fully support such programs that provide necessary resources to meet
identified community needs that compliment the economic and community development goals of the Town.
Of particular significance is the NC Department of Transportation Road and Bridge Improvements
program. The Pamlico River ferry system is also important to the economic health of Aurora. The Town
will support these programs and will honor financial assistance requests when financially able and when
the proposed project. is in compliance with the Town's goals for economic development.
The Erosion Control program, carried out by the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service
and the Soil Conservation Service is especially important to the farming community in the planning area.
'
The Town supports the efforts of these agencies, including the implementation of Best Management
Practices to mitigate soil loss through erosion. In addition, the Town has established a policy for a 75-
foot conservation buffer zone to reduce the sediment load from entering the system (See Resource
Protection policy statements).
1
There has been continued debate over the expansion of the Military Operating Airspace in Beaufort
County. Aurora is opposed to this expansion because of the restrictions it would impose on the local

'
41
air traffic community. Noise levels were an additional concern for the discouragement of this airspace
'
expansion.
6. Assistance to Channel Maintenance
Proper channel maintenance is important in Aurora, mainly because of.recreational boating and the
commercial fishing industry. Special attention should be given to .the amount of dredging that occurs,
because excessive dredging can be just as damaging as none at all. Dredge lines often disrupt valuable fish
habitat on the bottom of rivers, thereby robbing the river of some of its economic value and important fish
habitat.
Aurora will support channel maintenance projects, but discourage excessive dredging because of its
effect on fish habitat. Financial aid for channel maintenance will be made available when possible. Efforts
will be made to provide spoil and borrow sites within the planning area.
'
7. Energy Facility Sitin
At present there are no energy facilities in the Aurora area. The need for new facilities may change
'
in coming years as energy demand changes. The location of any type facility will have a positive impact
on the tax base. At the same time, potential exists for a negative environmental impact.
The general public can partly control the need for these facilities by limiting the demand for energy.
'
Changes in production requirements at Texasgulf may also affect the need for electricity. Conservation
of electricity and oil can eliminate the need for new sites. Conservation will require an educational
process that will take time to implement.
New energy facilities take years to get permitted and built. Electric generating plants in the Aurora
area should be small enough to be environmentally acceptable. Oil exploration or refining is not
anticipated at this time for Aurora. Policies on this will be adopted when a need occurs.
'
Policy Choices
• Energy generating facilities will be subject to a special use permit, granted by the Town
Planning Board.
• Restrict energy facilities to Rural areas on land classification map.
' Implementation Strategy
• Update zoning ordinance to reflect possibility of energy generating facilities.
& Tourism and Beach/Water Access
Aurora has demonstrated its commitment to public access'of public waters by having developed the
Town boat ramp in 1982. The Town is also committed to increasing tourism in_the area. Efforts to
increase tourism were brought on when the Fossil Museum was opened, and when Aurora was included
' as a part of the Historic Albemarle Tour Highway. The Town supports the efforts of the State agencies
who work with these projects.

42
Policy Alternatives
'
The Town could establish no additional policies or courses of action for development of
these industries assuming that the existing facilities are sufficient.
• The Town could encourage acquisition of undevelopable waterfront properties for public
'
access sites.
• The Towncould encourage "donations" of waterfront property for public use.
• Continue support for the Fossil Museum, downtown revitalization efforts, and other
methods to increase tourism.
Policy Choices
'
The Town will encourage acquisition of undevelopable waterfront properties for public
access sites.
• Work with the Division of Coastal Management in developing a program of "donations"
of waterfront property for public use.
• Continue support for the Fossil Museum, downtown revitalization efforts, and- other
methods to increase tourism.
' 9. TyM, Densities and Location of Anticipated Develo ment
Overly dense development is not a problem in Aurora, nor is it anticipated to become a problem
during the next ten years. Within the past five years, the land use trends have shown residential growth
to occur in areas south of Highway 33,. and commercial growth has expanded along Fifth Street and
' Highway 33 west. Aurora would like to see continued development in areas which are best able to
accommodate growth and where support services, like sewer and water, are feasible and practical to
provide. Much of the growth in recent years has been outside the hazard areas. Industrial growth will
be targeted to the land along Highway 33 west and in the northeastern quadrant of Town.
Policy Choices
• Continue to enforce the subdivision ordinance with minimum lot size of 20,000 square
feet for lots without public water and sewer.
• Continue with efforts to upgrade sewage treatment plant to accommodate additional
' customers.
• Ensure that future growth is consistent with the above policies in Resource Protection,
Resource Production and Management sections. Also, the growth must be consistent with
the zoning ordinance and additional goals of the community.
1

43
D. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
' Aurora realizes the importance of soliciting public input into the planning process. During the
development period of this land use plan update, several techniques were employed to encourage involvement
of Aurora area residents in the land use Alan's policies.
' At the beginning of the planning period, a citizen participation plan was developed:
Aurora. Land Use Plan Update - 1990
' Public Participation Plan
' In- accordance with subchapter 7B of the North Carolina Administrative Code, Land Use Planning
Guidelines, the planning process for the Aurora Land Use Plan Update (1990) is to be conducted in the
' public arena in order to involve, inform and educate a maximum cross-section of the population of the Town
of Aurora. The following structured plan is intended to continuously reach out and invite diversified segments
of this community to participate in the update process.
P P
' SteRs to accomplish maximum citizen involvement'
' 1. The Town of Aurora's Planning Commission consisting of the members listed on Attachment A, has
been designated as the appointed citizen advisory committee that will work on the Aurora Land Use
Plan Update (1990).. This commission is already familiar with the land use process (and has been
refamiliarized with newly adopted CAMA land use planning guidelines), having worked on the last
update in 1986.
Regularly scheduled monthly night meetings of the Commission are open to the public and will be
' advertised in advance in the Pamlico News, the Washington Daily News, and on Dateline, WITN-TV
Ts Community Calendar. An example of such advertisement is illustrated on Attachment B.
' 2. Members of the media will be invited to attend and participate in all work sessions and regularly
scheduled committee meetings held concerning the Land Use Plan Update.
3. Regular press releases of meetings with summaries of the project, its progress, and place and time of
' meetings will be sent to the media as soon after each meeting as possible.
' This citizen involvement plan is approved by the Aurora Planning Commission on Wednesday, January 17,
1990.
W. B. Thompson, Chairman
I

44
At the first meeting, the Planning Board decided to schedule regular monthly meetings every second
Wednesday from November through May. It was decided that all Planning Board meetings concerning the
ICAMA Land Use Plan Update should be made public. Citizen input was to be strongly encouraged.
The Board decided that initially, emphasis would be placed on public education about the land use
planning process. It was felt that once the public understood the importance of the plan, ' they would want to be involved in it. An effort was made to inform the. public about the existence of the plan and the
importance of their contribution on policy recommendations.
This was done in a variety of ways. First, news articles appeared in the local newspapers which
' discussed the plan and its purpose. Press releases were sent to two newspapers: the Washington Daily News.
based in Washington; and the Pamlico News from Oriental. The purpose of the articles was to explain the role
of the CAMA plan and the explanation of the issues addressed in it. Other methods of public education
involved direct communication with Aurora residents and Planning Board members.
In addition to the public education effort, press releases were sent to the local newspapers prior to
each meeting. Included in the press release was a description of the land.use plan and its purpose as well
as the agenda items. These newspaper articles intended to promote the understanding of the land use planning
process as well as to encourage the public to provide their opinion on various issues.
It is the belief of the Aurora Planning Board and Town Board that all citizens should be provided
adequate opportunity to participate in the governmental and planning decisions which affect them; therefore,
' the Town's policy will be to continue to solicit citizen input, primarily through the Planning Board. All
upcoming meetings will be advertised and adequately publicized to help keep citizens informed about the land
use changes occurring in their community.
Appendix A includes copies of newspaper and television notices.
' E. STORM HAZARDS MITIGATION, POST -DISASTER RECOVERY AND EVACUATION PLANS
The type and location of development in and around Aurora is directly tied to topographic, hydrologic,
And geologic features described earlier. The vulnerability of development to natural disasters is a byproduct
' of these features.. The number of people and the value of property that would be affected by a storm is
an important part of this plan.
' 1. Land Uses in Hazard Areas
The areas most vulnerable to the devastating effects of a hurricane or other major coastal storm are
identified in Map 4. This map is the product of a computer model called SLOSH (Sea, Lake, and
' Overland Surge from Hurricanes). The SLOSH model was developed by the US Army Corps of Engineers
to simulate the height of the storm surge from hurricanes of a predicted severity within a particular area.
The National Weather Service ranks hurricanes into Categories 1 through 5 based on their wind speeds.
' The SLOSH model analyzes each hurricane category scenario and provides theoretical areal boundaries
where flooding is expected to occur. For example, the Category 1 and 2 hurricanes, with wind speeds up
to 110 mph, would probably produce a storm surge that would flood a small stretch of land along the
' South Creek (Map 4). The Category 3 storm, defined by winds up to 130 miles per hour, would inundate
points further landward than the Category 1 and 2 storms. The category 4 and 5 storms, the highest
intensity storms possible, would push the water to areas still further landward. Since the Category 1, 2,
and 3 storms are more common, the discussion will be limited to their impact on the planning area.

1
IV. LAND CLASSIFICATION
The completion of the Inventory and Analysis section and the Policy Statement section allows for
development of the land classification plan. The use of a land classification system in conjunction with
a land classification map provides local officials the opportunity to designate areas for future growth. The
classification provides the opportunity to anticipate how planned land use interacts with environmentally
sensitive areas. The focus of the land classification plan is to evaluate the intensity of land utilization and
the level of services required to support that intensity. .
The CAMA guidelines include seven land classifications for use on the .land classification map:
Developed, Urban Transition, Limited Transition, Community, Rural, Rural with Services, and Conservation.
The definitions for each reflect the suggested level of development. Five of the land classifications are
used in" the Aurora planning area (Map 5). Described below will be the description of each land
classification, how the policies relate to each class, the type of land use in each class, and the location of
each class.
A. DEVELOPED
' The "Developed" land classification is intended for continued intensive development and redevelopment
of urban areas. It includes areas already developed as urban or those areas with a density of approximately
1,920 dwellings per square mile. In Aurora's case, the density is not present but is obtainable if buildable
' lots were used.
In the planning area, most of the land within the Aurora Town limits is classified as Developed.
Exceptions include the forested wetland area north of the downtown area and the wetlands along South
Creek. Approximately 97 percent of the persons living within this boundary are served by sewer service.
' All residents are provided water service.
E
B. URBAN TRANSITION
"Urban Transition" land is categorized as the lands providing for intensive urban development within
the ensuing ten years. These areas will be scheduled for provision of water and sewer in the future.
They: will also serve as the overflow sites for development when .additional lands are needed to
accommodate growth.. They will eventually become a part. of the. urban area.
The Urban Transition classification includes the areas located adjacent to the transportation routes
that run through Aurora. An additional concentration of this class exists in the western section of Town
near. the High School. This is the site of the new crab processing plant, as well as other commercial
enterprises. Since 1981, much of the development located along Highway 33 West has been commercial.
Trends over the past five years have shown most of the Town's residential development to occur in the
area south of Highway 33 near the Town limits in an existing residential area. The land use analysis
showed that although the soils are generally unsuitable for septic tanks, much of this area is not within
the hurricane hazard zone.
The relationship between the Developed and Urban Transition classes is important in a predominantly
rural area like eastern Beaufort County. The area within these classes is where detailed local land use and
public investment planning will occur. Large amounts of vacant land suitable for urban development within
the Developed class should be taken into account when calculating the amount of additional lands needed
to accommodate projected growth.
The local zoning ordinance recognizes this by specifying each particular land use and intensity of use
in both the Developed and Urban Transition land classes. The Developed 'areas are zoned for
55

54
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
(National Flood Insurance Program Information)
Division of Emergency Management
Department of Crime Control
and Public Safety
116 West Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27611
[phone]
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
National Office: Federal Emergency Management Agency
500 C Street, SW
Washington, DC 20472
Public Information: [phone]
Publications: [phone]
Regional Office: Federal Emergency Management Agency
Region IV
1375 Peachtree Street, NE
Atlanta, GA 30309
Public Information: [phone]
Disaster Assistance
Program: [phone]
Flood Insurance
Program: [phone]

53
Texasgulf employees located outside of Aurora could also be safely accommodated by this route. This time
figure is well within the twelve-hour warning time period provided by the National Weather Service.
'
Highway 33 can accommodate approximately 455 vehicles per hour at 35 miles per hour. During a twelve-
hour period, 5,460 vehicles could be relocated. This value is far above the calculated volume of traffic
estimated in the model.
'
Aurora area evacuees can find shelter at Aurora Nigh School, The High School is located at a higher
elevation outside of the flood hazard zone. A full description of the capacity and adequacy of this shelter
is provided in the Beaufort County Disaster Relief and Evacuation Plan.
'
7. Policies Related to the Evacuation Plan
'
a. The Town will seek to educate citizens about evacuation procedures and their
responsibilities in any severe storm situation.
& Reports
The Town of Aurora is responsible for reporting all of its activities concerning storm hazard mitigation
and hurricane preparedness with the following agencies:
'
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
'
State Office: Division of Coastal Management
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
'
[phone]
'
Field Office: Division of Coastal Management
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
P.O. Box 1507
Washington, NC 27889
'
[phone]
'
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
State Office: Division of Emergency Management
Department of Crime Control and Public Safety
116 West Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27611
[phone]
Regional Office:Area Emergency Management Coordinator
North Carolina Division of Emergency Coordinator
607 Bank Street
Washington, NC 27889
[phone]

52
The schedule for permitting other properties is as follows:
• Moderate damage, meeting permit regulations;
• Moderate damage, requiring permit decisions;
'
• Extensive damage, requiring permits.
This system was established to avoid interference with the reconstruction of public utilities and
facilities. The top priority in post -disaster reconstruction is the replacement of services.
The development standards for reconstruction will be in accordance with the Storm Hazard Mitigation
policies set forth by the Town. As a minimum, the. State Building Code will be enforced as well as
building restriction imposed by the Federal Flood Insurance Program. The County Commissioners will
be the legislative body to enforce these policies.
'
Consideration of the possible relocation of public facilities to safer locations was not undertaken by
the County. Since the Aurora wastewater treatment plant is located in the hazard area, this should be a
'
priority for the decision -makers.
5. Policies Related to Post -Disaster Reeovcry
a. The Town will support and enforce The Beaufort County Disaster Relief and Assistance
'
Plan.
'
b. The Town will appoint and educate a Recovery Task Force to work cooperatively with the
County during a disaster. This Recovery Task Force will include the Mayor, Town
Engineer, Town Planning Board, Rescue and Fire Squad Volunteers, and the Medical
Board.
'
The Town
c. will encourage the relocation of structures out of the hazardous areas.
d. The Town will encourage the rebuilding of structures in hazardous areas only if
'
reconstruction includes measures to protect against recurring damage.
e.. The Town will consider relocating _ their public utility facilities to a safer location if
'
reconstruction is required.
f. The Town will impose a moratoria on general reconstruction after a disaster.
'
Reconstruction will follow the schedule listed in paragraph 4 above.
6. Evacuation Plan
'
According to Before the Storm in Beaufort County, the current evacuation routes in the Aurora area
are sufficient. Highway 33 is the principal route for evacuation to a safer location. This highway serves
all of the Aurora area plus those persons living near the Pamlico County line.
'
The planning area is broken into two evacuation zones: Zones VI and VII. Since such a small
portion of the planning area is located in Zone VI, this discussion will be limited to Zone VII. The Zone
VII evacuation route is Highway 33 North from the Pamlico County line to Highway 17 near Chocowinity.
There are no surge inundation points along this route. Highway 33 has adequate capacity, but safe
'
evacuation will depend on the amount of warning time provided and the willingness of the inhabitants
to evacuate. Based on the model in the Beaufort County Disaster Relief and Evacuation Plan, it would
take less than seven hours to evacuate the estimated 1,000 people in Aurora and its vicinity. The 1,200

' 51
The responsibilities of this task force are to . review . the nature of damages in the
' community, establish an overall restoration schedule, identify and evaluate alternative approaches
for repair and reconstruction, and make recommendations for community recovery. The task force
will work with State and Federal representatives on the Interagency Regional Hazard Mitigation
Team and also the Section 406 Hazard Mitigation Survey and Planning Teams. Members of the
' recovery task force will include:
Beaufort County Commissioners
County Engineer and Building Inspector
County Manager
City Managers and Engineers from
each municipality
' County Emergency Management Coordinator
County Health Department.
' The Mayor of Aurora will be called upon to serve on this task force. The Town Engineer
will also serve. Although this task force will review damages, the authority to approve or deny
permits will remain the responsibility of the appropriate authorities.
Long Term Recovery
' The procedures listed above deal directly with policies for clean-up immediately after a storm
or disaster. In conjunction with the policies stated above on storm hazard mitigation, consideration
' should be given to long-term recovery. Formulation of more stringent building standards should be
considered to prevent the destruction from recurring.
In the aftermath of a disaster, reconstruction efforts will be rampant. A plan for the long-
term recovery is essential. In order to handle the rush, a priority system has been designed to stage
and permit repairs. Staging and permitting repairs and construction for the County are as follows:
FIRST PRIORITY: Replacement of essential services such as power,
' water, telephone, and streets and bridges;
SECOND PRIORITY: Minor repairs;
' THIRD PRIORITY: Major repairs;
FOURTH PRIORITY: New development.
' In efforts to streamline the permitting process for the large number of applications for building
permits, a policy has been established by the County to repair and rebuild essential service facilities first.
' Second priority is to repair other public facilities as necessary for shelter. A triage (worst damage)
approach will be instituted for staging the reconstruction efforts. Properties with little damage would be
permitted immediately if they were in compliance with permit regulations before the storm.
I

' 50
It is important that officials clearly understand the joint Federal/State/local procedures for providing
' assistance to rebuild after a storm so that local damage assessment and reconstruction efforts are carried
out in an efficient manner that qualifies the community for the different types of assistance that are
available. The requirements are generally delineated in the Disaster Relief Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-288) which
authorizes a wide range of financial and direct assistance to local communities and individuals.
During reconstruction after a disaster, two phases of action are usually undertaken: immediate post -
disaster clean-up, and clean-up and repair over a longer period. Although these guidelines are directed
for the County level, the Town of Aurora may take additional steps to complement this work. The
following section discusses guidelines set forth for reconstruction in the County plan.
Immediate CleanNp
The Disaster. Relief and Assistance Plan, includes a for immediate clean-up and
program P
debris removal from roads, beaches, and other areas where public health and safety may be
' jeopardized. The responsibility for completing these duties will be a combined effort by several
agencies from the public and private sectors. The Department of Transportation will be
responsible for clearing debris from roads and the Forest Service will remove fallen trees from the
' area, if necessary. In addition, the County Emergency Management Office will provide names of
volunteers to call upon for assistance in the immediate clean-up efforts.
While clean-up efforts are taking place, a damage assessment team will be sent out to
evaluate the extend of damage in the area. Damage assessment is defined as a rapid means of
' determining a realistic estimate of the amount of damage caused by a natural or manmade disaster.
For a storm disaster, it is expressed in terms of: 1) the number of structures damaged, 2)
magnitude of damage by type of structure, 3) estimated total dollar loss, and 4) estimated total
' dollar loss covered by insurance.
After a major storm event, members of the Damage Assessment Team should conduct two
types of surveys: one which roughly estimates the extend and type of damage, and a more detailed
' second phase assessment after the initial damage reports are filed. The initial damage assessment
should include an estimate of the extend of damage incurred by each structure and identify the
cause such as wind, flooding, or wave action of the damage of each structure. Rapid and general
initial damage assessment reports are to be submitted by radio within one hour. Within six hours,
private property summaries and more detailed reports should be nearly complete. The format for
damage assessments will be conducted in accordance with Annex F of the Disaster Relief and
Assistance Plan.
Under certain circumstances, interim development moratoria can be used to give a local
government the time to assess damages, make sound decisions, and to learn from storm
experiences. Beaufort County can impose a development moratorium if it gets disaster declaration
' from the appropriate Federal authorities. This disaster declaration must stipulate the type and
extend of reconstruction that will be paid for by the Federal Insurance Agency. The length of the
moratorium will depend on the extent of the damage. A decision will be made at that time.
Damage assessment operations are oriented to take place during the emergency period.
After the emergency operations to restore public health and safety and the initial damage
assessments are completed, the guidelines suggest that a recovery task force be appointed to guide
restoration and reconstruction activities during a post -emergency phase which could last from weeks
' to possibly more than a year. The County has formed a group with members from all areas of
the County to serve as a task force for recovery.

49
• Erosion .
The product of severe winds, high water, and wave action is erosion. The areas most
likely to be impacted by erosion are the shoreline areas within the planning jurisdiction. Riggs,
Bellis, O'Conner (1979) studied shoreline types and their vulnerability to erosion. They concluded
' that the areas most likely to erode were the low bank, marsh and high bank forms of shoreline.
The low bank and marsh are the most common shoreline types in the Aurora area. Marsh
shorelines are generally characterized by vertical scarps with drop abruptly into one to eight feet
of water. Much of the Aurora shoreline is in marshes. Further downstream, the low bank
shoreline dominate.
' In summary, all four of the major damaging forces of a hurricane would negatively impact Aurora.
The areas most likely to receive damage are the sites located along the shoreline. The cumulative impacts
of wind, water, waves, and subsequent erosion will cause the most destruction. Damage from flood waters
in the Category 1 through 3 zones would likely amount to $4.3 million, assuming total destruction. The
wastewater treatment plant is located in a high risk zone. Relocation of this facility should be a top
priority for the Town of Aurora.
' 3. Policies To Mitigate Storm Damage
a. The Town will encourage the building of structures that will stand against the high winds,
' flooding and other damaging effects of severe storms.
b. The Town will discourage high density development and large structures in the most
' hazardous areas.
c. The Town will seek an educational program warning its citizens of the dangers of severe
storms and evacuation procedures in the event of a severe storm.
4. Post -Disaster Recovery
A post -disaster recovery plan allows -the Town to deal with the aftermath of a storm in an organized
and efficient manner. The plan provides for the mechanisms, procedures, and policies that will enable the
Town to learn from its storm experience and to rebuild in a practical way.
A recovery plan typically has five purposes, according to Before the Storm: Avoiding Harm's Way
(McElyea, Brower, and Godschalk,1982). It usually outlines procedures and requirements before damages
occur, establishes procedures for putting storm mitigation measures into effect after the disaster, analyzes
information about the location and nature of hurricane damages, assesses the community's vulnerability,
and guides reconstruction to minimize the vulnerability.
In 1982, Beaufort County adopted The Beaufort County Disaster Relief and Assistance Plan a post -
disaster recovery and reconstruction plan. As a municipality in Beaufort County, Aurora is covered by
this plan. The disaster relief plan, in concert with Before the Storm in Beaufort County: Avoiding Harm's
Way, provides Beaufort County with the tools necessary to serve all of its communities during the recovery
phase of a hurricane. Copies of these plans are available at the Beaufort County Emergency Management
Office in Washington, North Carolina.

I
2 Storm Hazard Mitigation
' Hurricanes are extremely powerful, destructive meteorological events which are often unpredictable.
Destruction is typically the result of the combined energy of high winds, storm surge, flooding, erosion, and
wave action. Of these, the two most damaging components of any hurricane striking Aurora is the high
' winds which define it and flooding from excessive rains. In addition to these two forces, wave action and
erosion are two by-products of the wind and rain along the land/water interface. Inasmuch as Aurora is
located about 8 miles from the Pamlico River, 30 miles from the mouth of the Pamlico Sound, and 55
' miles from the Atlantic Ocean, the threat of storm surge damage is minimized and will not be discussed
further. The following section discusses the effect of each of these storm components on the planning area
and delineates the sites which are most vulnerable to their forces.
' High Winds
High winds are the greatest risk factor associated with hurricanes. Hurricanes are, in fact,
' defined in severity by their wind speeds. The entire planning area would be subject to the winds
brought on by a hurricane making landfall nearby. Again, the areas most seriously impacted would
be the shoreline areas, the wetlands, and other areas in the 100-year floodplain. Sites that
' experience backwash such as open field ditches would also be impacted. The high winds would
result in flooding. Building restrictions concerning wind stress should be applied in areas closest '
to the shore.
• Flooding
Unlike high winds, flood waters may not impact all areas hit by a storm. According to
' the SLOSH model map, most of the planning area would be subject to flooding from a Category
4 or 5 storm. The frequency of a hurricane of this magnitude is less than a one percent change
in any given year. More common storms, like the Category 1 through 3 hurricanes, would flood
nearly two-thirds of the area in Town. There are about ten commercial establishments located
here, as well as nearly 150 homes. A rough estimate of $26,000 per home and $20,000 per
commercial establishment would bring the figure to about $4.3 million dollars. This is a
substantial portion of the Town's tax base.
• Wave Action
Damage from wave action is very strongly correlated to wind speed and direction. Most
' damage caused by waves will be in the immediate zone of the water along the estuarine shoreline
and coastal wetlands. Development adjacent to or included as part of the estuarine shoreline
would be subject to battering by waves. Since marshes occupy a very large segment of the
' shoreline, little would be at risk. In Town, the public boat ramp plus its pavement and docking
would be at risk from wave action. Other structures are located at a safe distance from the
shoreline.

TABLE 6.
Inventory of Structures in the Hazard Area, Aurora, North Carolina.
CONVENTIONAL DOUBLE -WIDE SINGLE -WIDE
HOMES MOBILE HOMES MOBILE HOMES INSTITUTION
COMMERCIAL
INDUSTRY
UTILITIES
TOTAL
TOWN
200 12 38 3
16
2
1
271
Median Value
26K 10K 4k 45K
20K
40K
40K
Total
Estimated Value
5.2 million 120K 150K 135K
320K
40K
40K
6.727
million
Floodprone Area
Category 1-3
150 10 38 2
10
1
1
210
Total
Estimated Value
3.9 million 100K 42K 190K
200K
80K
40K
4327
million
NOTE. The total assessed value for tax purposes of the Town of Aurora was $12,212,468, 1989 (Beaufort County Tax Office).
Source: Before the Storm in Beaufort County: Avoiding Harm's Way. Land Use Inventory, 1990.

EM
In Aurora, the Category 1 and 2 flood zone incorporates a large portion of the eastern section of
Town as well as all incorporated areas of South Creek. The flood boundary approximately coincides with
Third Street. The limited development in this flood zone includes about one -eighth of the Town's
residences. No major commercial establishments are located here. The new Hudson Manufacturing
building and the new fire station are located in this area. Development also includes the public boat ramp,
several homes along East Main Street, plus an apartment complex located on First Street. Within 75 feet
of the shoreline, development is limited because much of the area is in undevelopable marshes. The
combined value of structures in this flood zone is estimated at $1,720,000.
The area which would be inundated by the Category 3 storm is far more monetarily valuable to the
Town. The boundary for the Category 3. storm goes beyond the Category 1 and 2 storm line and
approximately coincides with the 100-year flood plain. A much greater amount of development is located
in this area. Approximately 150 conventional houses,10 commercial establishments,10 double -wide mobile
homes, and 38 single -wide mobile homes are located here (Town Clerk, 1990). The combined estimated
value of all property in the Category 1, 2, and 3 zones is estimated at $4,327,000 (Table 6). This figure
is more than 70 percent of the total assessed tax value of the Town. The municipal wastewater treatment
facility is also located in this flood zone. Consideration should be given to its relocation to a less
hazardous site.
Although many structures would be at risk from a storm, the areas which would be most seriously
affected would be the AECs in the planning area. These include estuarine waters, estuarine shorelines,
coastal wetlands, and public trust waters. Of these, the estuarine shoreline and coastal wetlands AECs will
bear the greatest risk of destruction because they lie directly on the land -water interface and are among
the most dynamic features of the coastal landscape. Shoreline erosion is a day-to-day phenomenon that
is accelerated greatly with the energy of a major storm. Destruction that may take years to occur along
a normal low -energy shoreline can occur in a matter of several hours during a strong storm. The shoreline
area will be directly impacted by severe erosion and scouring, direct wave action, high winds, and complete
inundation by storm surge accompanying the storm. Development adjacent to the shoreline would
obviously be at a great risk.

57
commercial, industrial, and residential uses and are currently served by the Town's facilities. The Urban
Transition areas are recognized on the zoning map as having potential for future growth. The zoning
ordinance shows some of these areas as rural;. but areas along traffic arteries are zoned for commercial and
residential uses. The zoning ordinance recognizes that future development will be located in these areas.
C. COMMUNITY
The "Community" classification is usually characterized by a small cluster of mixed land uses in a
rural area which do not require municipal services. It usually serves to meet the housing, light shopping,
employment, and public services needs of a rural area. The Community classification typifies crossroads
areas along primary and secondary roads.
In the Aurora planning area, only the Royal/St. Peter's Church area is classified as Community. The
Royal community includes a small cluster of homes, a church, and a country store. It is not anticipated.
that Aurora's municipal services will be extended to this community. Wells and septic tanks currently serve
the basic needs of this community, and there is a limited need to provide additional services to Royal.
D. RURAL
The "Rural" classification is designed for agriculture, forestry, mineral extraction, and other low intensity
uses.. Urban services are not required because of the great dispersion of development in these areas.
These are lands identified as appropriate locations for resource management and related uses; agricultural,
mineral, or forest lands; and areas with enough limitations to make development hazardous or economically
infeasible.
The majority of the land within the planning area falls within this classification and is under
agricultural production. In addition, the Rural classification is particularly important for the extension of
phosphate mining operations. It should be emphasized that development should not be precluded from
the agricultural lands located in this classification; this designation implies that urban services are not
planned to accommodate future development.
' E. CONSERVATION
The "Conservation" class provides for the effective long-term management of significant, limited or
' irreplaceable resources. This includes, as a minimum, all of the statutorily defined AECs such as the
estuarine waters, the public trust waters, the estuarine shoreline and coastal wetlands. This also includes
the land defined as the conservation buffer zone extending for a distance of 75 feet beyond the shoreline
of the public trust waters and marshes (see Resource Protection policy statements). Because of difficulties
' with mapping detail, the definition of this buffer for permitting purposes will need to be made on site.
The Town has made a distinction between State regulated areas of environmental importance and other
areas not offered State protection. The purpose of designating the conservation buffer area is to provide
' added protection for water quality in the surface waters in the public's trust.
The Conservation class does not imply "non-use." It is intended to provide for careful and cautious
management of the uses allowed. Preservation, on the other hand, implies total restriction of all uses in
an effort to keep the natural environment intact. Through conscientious management, the Conservation
' class requires all uses to be as unoffensive as possible. The intention of the Conservation

58
class is to strike a balance between careful long-term management of sensitive natural and cultural
resources and the freedom of landowners to utilize their property to its best use.
'
In order to protect its natural integrity, various types of land uses should be prohibited from the
Conservation classification.. The Town has decided that the NCAC permitted uses for statutorily -defined
AECs are consistent with the Town's long-term goal of resource protection. The Town does not feel the
'
need to add specific uses to this already satisfactory list of restrictive uses. All uses permitted by the State
will be considered consistent with the Town's objectives.
'
F. RELATIONSHIP TO POLICIES
Within the Town of Aurora there are only two land classifications - Developed and Conservation. The
'
extraterritorial jurisdiction includes all five classifications discussed in Section IV and shown on Map 5.
1. Developed Class
'
The majority of land within the Town Limits of Aurora is classified as developed. This
includes both commercial and residential areas that currently can be characterized as being intensely
developed according to small town standards. Municipal services exist in Aurora and development is
'
controlled by a local zoning ordinance.
The policies of the Town .take into account the slow growth and minimal development
pressured that now exist. The Town's policies also reflect their desire to see growth managed so as to
'
protect natural resources as well as economic and community development. While growth has been
minimal, both policies and public infrastructure are in place to handle a rapid rate of growth.
Aurora would welcome more growth, so long as it is compatible with their policies, is practical
'
and feasible, and will not harm the environment.
2. Conservation Class
'
All land adjacent to South Creek and Bailey Creek is classified as Conservation. This area
includes AEC lands, waters and wetlands and is deserving of the strictest development regulations in order
to protect the natural environment. The Town of Aurora .has developed policies that are consistent with
most state and federal regulations protecting such areas, and supports the enforcement of permitting
procedures and restrictions.
' 3. Rural Class
Outside the Town limits, but within the extraterritorial jurisdiction, the majority of land is
designated as rural. These areas are located all around Aurora; and consist of agricultural, forest and
' low intensity uses. Special use relates to the extension of phosphate mining operations. Accordingly,
policies have been made that will permit development consistent with state and federal regulations. Aurora
wishes to encourage growth while protecting prime rural lands.
4. Urban Transition Class
A small area of urban transition land is located due west of the Town limits and south of
Aurora along SR 1939 and SR 1925. The area along NC 33 West will probably develop commercially, with
the other urban transition areas experiencing residential growth for the most part. Industrial growth could

59
take place in several locations within this area. The Aurora zoning ordinance will control this
development.
Policies support Aurora's desire to encourage controlled growth that will reinforce the local -
economy.
5. Community Class
The smallest amount of land in any classification around Aurora is the community class. Only
one small area is so designated. In the extreme southeast portion of the ETJ is the community of
Royal/St. Peter's Church.
Aurora's policies do not specifically deal with this area. Indirectly, policies imply the Town
is not planning to extend utility services to such crossroads communities unless it is cost effective.

1
V. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION
The land use plan is a tool for coordinating numerous policies, standards, regulations, and other
governmental activities. The plan provides the framework for budgeting, planning, and the provision and
'
expansion of community facilities such as water, sewer, school, and road systems. It is the principal policy
guide for governmental decisions and activities which affect land use in the Aurora area. . The
implementation of policies in the land use plan requires coordination between the local government and
'
the State and Federal governments. A copy of this plan will be given to Beaufort County officials upon
certification by the Coastal Resources Commission. During its developmental period, the plan was
continuously evaluated for its consistencies between State and Federal regulation.Enforcement of the
policies and goals requires a consistency with the higher levels of government. The formation of a policy
without means of enforcement defeats the intention of the land use plan update.
Aurora has worked to ensure compatibility between the Beaufort County and Aurora Land Use Plans.
There appeared to be no inconsistencies between the policies in each plan. A good working relationship
'
exists between the Town of Aurora and Beaufort County.
The Town of Aurora intends to foster intergovernmental coordination by working with State and
Federal agencies to implement policies to improve water quality, as well as carry out goals for the
agriculture and commercial fishing industries. In addition, Aurora will work with the North Carolina
'
Department of Cultural Resources in protecting and enhancing its heritage. Coordination between the
Division of Coastal Management and US Army Corps of Engineers will be maintained in the permitting
process for development in areas classified as wetlands. All additional efforts will b made to promote
'
cooperation between the State, Federal, County, and Aurora governments.
Listed below are Federal and State agencies with the licenses and permits for which they are responsible:
FEDERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
AGENCY LICENSES AND PERMITS
Army Corps of Engineers - Permits required under Sections 9 and 10 of the Rivers and
'
(Department of Defense) Harbor Act of 1899, permits to construct in navigable waters.
- Permits required under Section 103 of the Marine Protection,
'
Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972.
- Permits required under Section 404. of the Federal Water
'
Pollution Control Act of 1972; permits to undertake dredging
and/or filling activities.
Coast Guard - Permits for bridges, causeways, pipelines over navigable
(Department of Transportation waters required under the General Bridge Act of 1946 and
the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
60

61
AGENCY LICENSES AND PERMITS
Geological Survey - Permits required for off -shore drilling.
Bureau of Land Management
(Department of Interior) - Approvals of OCS pipeline corridor rights -of -way.
Nuclear Regulatory -
(Department of Energy)
Federal Energy -
Commission (Department
of Energy)
Licenses for siting, construction and operation of
nuclear power plants; required under the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954 and. Title II of the Energy
Reorganization Act of 1974.
Permits for construction, operation and maintenance. of
interstate pipeline facilities required under the Natural
Gas Act of 1938.
Orders of Interconnection of electric transmission facili-
ties under Section 202(b) of the Federal Power Act.
Permission required for abandonment of natural gas
pipeline and associated facilities under Section 7C(b)
of the Natural Gas Act of 1938.
STATE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
AGENCY LICENSES AND PERMITS
Department of Environ- - Permits to discharge to surface waters or operate
ment, Health and Community or oil discharge permits; NPDES Permits (G.S. 143-215).
Development
Division of Environ- - Permits for septic tanks that serve industrial process water flow or
mental Management are community owned. Such systems owned by the State or Federal
Government are under the jurisdiction of the Health Department,
(G.S. 143-215.108).
Permits for air pollution abatement facilities and sources
(G.S. 143-215.108).

. WI.. , . .
62
AGENCY LICENSES AND PERMITS
Permits for construction of complex sources; e.g., parking
lots, subdivisions, stadiums, etc. (G.S. 143-215.109).
Permits for construction of a well over 100,000 gpd
(G.S.87-88).
Division of Coastal - Permits to dredge and/or fill in estuarine waters tidelands,
Management etc.(G.S. 87-88).
Permits to undertake development in Areas of Environmental Concern
(G.S. 113A-118).
NOTE: Minor development permits are issued by local government.
Division of Land - Permits to alter or construct a dam (G.S. 143-215.66).
Resources
- Permits to mine (G.S.74-51).
Permits to drill an exploratory oil or gas well (G.S. 113-391).
Permits to conduct geographic exploration (G.S. 113-391).
Sedimentation erosion control plans for any land -disturbing activity
of over one contiguous acre (G.S. 113A-54).
Permits to construct an oil refinery.
Department of - Easements to fill where lands are proposed to be raised above
Administration the normal high water mark of navigable waters by filling
(G.S. 146.6(c)).
Department of - Approval to operate a solid waste disposal site or facility (G.S.130).
Human Resources
Approval for construction of any public water facility that furnishes
water to ten or more residences (G.S. 130-160.1).
Permits for septic tank systems of 3,000 gpd or less capacity
(G.S. 130-160).

'
VI. SUMMARY
The completion of the Aurora Land Use Plan update does not end the planning process for the
'
Town. The plan is based on data and regulations in effect at the time of its adoption. Changes in
regulations may necessitate changes in the plan. In order to have an effective plan and implement its
policies, a considerable amount of work will be required. Further, active citizen participation will help
ensure successful implementation.
'
The continued use of this land use plan will be part of the planning process. By updating ordinances
and regulations the Town will achieve the goals of the plan. Leadership by the Town Board will be needed
to provide growth management. The update five years from now will hopefully analyze a land use plan
'
that has been well used.
1
63

AURORA 19% LAND USE PLAN UPDATE
Analysis of Public Meetings
February 8, 1990
p November 1989- time of organization and preparation for the Land Use Planning Committee which
' g Commission. Each member was given a copy of the 1986 Plan and information on
t e astal Area Management Act, purposes of land use plans, and NCDEHNR's land use planning
' guidelines..
A meeting was set up December 13, 1989, 7.00 PM in Aurora's Town Hall. At this first
organizational meeting, the _ arized with the land use planning process. The Board
' consists of the same members that worked on the 1986 land use plan update,. with the exception of one
member.
A work timetable was then developed, along with a citizen participation plan. The floor was then open for
' general discussion of the Town, past events, present situations, and future expectations.
Discussions included the following subjects:
• SCHOOLS. The feeling of losing quality education in the present school system was voiced. The
Board felt that the system is a victim of gross mismanagement and most people who can afford it
' send their children to private schools. Even the football team has been lost.
• RECREATIONAL FACILPIZF.S. Aurora has recently built a public marina and a .private marina
also exists. The park area next to the school is leased from Texasgulf and the lease is running out.
The Town does not intend to renew the lease.
• NEW CONSTRUCTION. The Board mentioned the recent construction of a fire and rescue
' building, a new ABC store building, and a concrete company. Plans for a new building to house
the new clothing manufacturing firm, Hudson Manufacturing, are underway. Anticipation of new
construction along NC Highway 33, the Town's bypass, is apparent.
' HOUSING. Recently an influx of public housing developments has occurred in Aurora. The
feeling expressed is that these developments attract persons to the community that don't contribute
to the Town's tax base.
• PUBLIC FACILTIWS. Generally, water and sewer services are good. The sewage treatment
method involves piping discharge directly into the middle of South Creek. The Town lost its police
officer three years ago and hasn't gotten another one. There is a turnover of doctors about every
two years, but the dentist is there to stay.
• NATURAL RESOURCES, Bald eagles, ospreys, and bears have been sited in the area. Hunting
is a big industry, with three hunting clubs in the area. The water draws people to fish and Aurora
would like to see a nice restaurant located on South Creek.-, It's about four miles by water to get
to the Pamlico River. The Town is not very old, having been started in the 1890s, and is not rich
in historical resources.

2
The second land use planning meeting was hel Ch anuary 17, 1990, a was advertised. The citizen
participation plan was formally accepted or apprd "._ urora citizen that had seen the
newspaper announcement attended.
Robert J. Paciocco Planner -in -Charge of the project, led the discussion. Past policies were individually
assessed for their practicality, enforceability, and implementation. Drawing from. what Mr. Paciocco knew
about the Town, and what the Planning Board knew about what has been done to follow through with the
policies, the Town rated fairly well. The Town Council will also be looking at the 1986 plan's policies and
assessing them.

■
i MID -EAST
COMMISSION
December 14, 1989
' The Washington Daily News
c% Keith Hempstead
' 217 North Market Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
' Dear Mr. Hempstead:
Attached is the article we discussed over the phone pertaining to Aurora's Land Use Plan
Update for 1990.
I would appreciate your publishing this, or an edited version (whatever you prefer), in the
newspaper sometime next week.
Please feel free to keep in contact with me on this project at the Mid -East Commission, 946-
8043. We welcome you to attend any and all meetings of the Planning Board during this process.
Sincerely,
' Tamara Schatz .
Land Use Planner
' TSra
Attach:
cc: Bob Paciocco, Executive Director
-`----- ■ P.O. Drawer 1787 0 Washington, North Carolina 27889 0 [phone] ® -

AURORA BEGINS WORK ON ITS
LAND USE PLAN UPDATE FOR 1990
AURORA - Last Wednesday night, the Planning Commission of the Town of Aurora began
work on its 1990 Land Use Plan Update.
This first meeting was held to discuss the organization of next year's update, a plan to involve
citizens in the update process, and a general overview of development trends in the Aurora area.
The Planning Board will meet monthly to discuss the plan. All meetings are open to the
public and participation is encouraged. The next meeting is set for January 17, 1990, at 7:00 PM
in the Town Hall.
The land use plan is a document used to assess and guide development occurring in the next
five to ten years. All twenty counties covered by North Carolina's Coastal Area Management Act
must update their land use plans every five years.
Tamara Schatz of Washington's Mid -East Commission is providing technical assistance to the
Town. Robert J. Paciocco, Mid -East's Executive Director, is the designated Planner -in -Charge and
will be overseeing the update process.
' 12/14/89

WASHINGTON DAILY NEWS, MONDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1989
WON
Aurora begins to update
land use plan..for 190.
• . E. r.n..Pie
AURORA — The Aurora Plan- The land use -Plan is a document .
ning Commission began work on the used to assess and guide develop
1990 Land Use Plan ;Update this ment occurring in the next five to
week. f i ten years. All 20 counties covered by
The first meting held Wednesday:. North Carolina's Coastal Area Man.
was to discuss the, organization of:.agementAct must update theirland
next year's update, a plan to involve '. : plans every five. years. $ .
citizens in the update process, and a { F,
general overview'of development`` ;Tamara Schatz of Washington's'
trends in the Aurora area. Mrd-East Commission is providing
. The Planning board will meet : technical assistance to the Town.
monthly to discuss the plan. All Roberti. Paciocco, Mid -East's Di- 1
meetings are open to the public. The rector, is the designated Planner -in- ]
next meeting is Jan.17 at 7 p.m. in Charge and will be overseeing the.
the Town Hall. 'update process.
01

A�YID-EAST COMMISSION
January 8, 1990
About Town
Washington Daily News
P.O. Box 1788
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Dear Sirs:
Could you publish the following announcement in an editioh of your paper sometime before
January 17, 1990?
AURORA - January 17,1990, at 7:00 PM, the Aurora Planning Board will
meet at the Town Hall to discuss the updating of the Town's Land Use Plan.
All interested citizens are invited and encouraged to participate in the
updating process..
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
����
Tamara Schatz
Land Use Planner
TSra
0 P.O. Drawer 1787 ® Washington, North Carolina 27889 0 [phone]

MID -EAST COMMISSION
January 11, 1990
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aurora Planning Commission Members
'FROM: Tamara Schatz, Land Use Planner
SUBJ: Land Use Plan Update Meeting of January 17, 1990
At our next regularly scheduled Land Use Planning meeting to be held on Wednesday, January
17, at 7:00 PM in the Town Hall, the following discussion items will be addressed:
• Analysis of, existing plans, policies and regulations.
• Analysis of policy statements and implementation actions of the
1986 Update.
Formulation of future land use policies and implementation
strategies.
look forward to seeing you Wednesday night. Please don't forget to bring your 1986 plan for
reference.
TS/ja
® P.O. Drawer 1787 0 Washington, North Carolina 27889 0 [phone] 0

MID -EAST COMMISSION
December 18, 1989
WITN=TV 7
Attn: Vicki Crumpler
P.O. Box 468
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Dear Ms. Crumpler:
I am currently working with the Town of Aurora and the County of Bertie in updating their
Land Use Plans.
In order to involve the public with these plan updates, could you air the attached
announcements on your community calendar?
appreciate your assistance in this matter.
Sincerely,
Tamara Schatz
Land Use Planner
TSra
Attachments
cc: Robert J. Paciocco, Executive Director
Connie R. Price, Director of Planning
■ P.O. Drawer 1787 ® Washington, North Carolina 27889 ® [phone] ■

COMMISSION
December 18, 1989
WNCT-TV 9
c/o Community Calendar
P.O. Box 898
Greenville, North Carolina 27835
Dear Sirs:
I am currently working with the Town of Aurora and the County of Bertie in updating their
Land Use Plans.
In order to involve the public with. these plan updates, could you air the attached
announcements on your community calendar?
I appreciate your assistance in this matter.
Sincerely,
�Q/YYIQILG� ��
a'
T mara Schatz
Land Use Planner
TSra
Attachments
cc: Robert J. Paciocco, Executive Director
Connie R. Price, Director of Planning
j.
0 P.O. Drawer 1787 ® Washington, North Carolina 27889 0 [phone]

FOR TELEVISION CALENDAR BROADCAST
The Bertie County Economic and Industrial Planning and Development Commission will be
meeting at the Carolina House Restaurant in Windsor on Tuesday, January 9, 1990, at 12:30
PM for a luncheon meeting. The Commission is currently preparing an update for 1990 of
Bertie County's Land Use Plan.
This meeting is open to the public and all interested citizens are encouraged to attend.
The Planning Commission for the Town of Aurora will meet on Wednesday, January 17,
1990, at 7:00 PM at Aurora's Town Hall. The Commission is currently updating the Land
Use Plan for the Town, and all interested citizens in the Aurora area are invited to attend.
e
Contact Person: Tamara Schatz, Land Use Planner
Mid -East Commission
P.O. Box 1787
Washington, NC 27889
[phone]
TSra 12/18/89

l
FRIDAY, JANUARY
12• 1
'
WASHINGTON DAILY NEWS,
i
WED EN SDAY, JAN 17
i
Aurora Planning Board, 7
Town Hell. Discussion on. up-
5
'
dating of the town's band U0e P,�an•
citizens .are in
Interested
participate in the updating p `
r
�
,
q
WASHINGTON DAILY NEWS, FRIDAY,.,JANUARY 12, 1990
'
WEDNESDAY JAN ,'
r ,17..
Aurora Planning ;~Board, •: 7
'
p.m., Town Mall.!DisCUSSIOn on
`, dating of the townhand Use Plan.
Interested citizens .are invite Ito
participate in the u t_ing pracess_s
'
_daa

M a = = M M M = = M = = = = M .M = M
Washington and Aurora to update
mandatory
land use plans in 1990
through,' she sai&
The Coastal Area Management
will lead discussions with the
Washington Planning and Zoning
By Betty Cray
Staff Writer
Act of 1974 established a coopera-
Board and Aurora officials to review
Washington and Aurora will look
tive program nationwide ofland use
current policy statements to be sure
into the future over the next nine
planning between local govern-
they meet the city's needs.
months as they update their land
ments in the coastal areas and the
Alanduse plan is similar to draw-'
use plans.
states,
ing a picture of where local govern -
But often the hardest part of
That law recognized that local
ments am and whom they want to
planning is getting local govern-
communities along the coast had on.
be, while protecting environmen.
ments to use their plans, once dove.
vironmental responsibilities beyond
tally sensitive areas, Ms. Daught:-
loped, said Jane Daughtridge, plan-
their borders.
ridge said.
ner with the lldid-East Commission.
North Carolina approved its ver.
The state provides guidelines for
'It's difficult ttingpeople to use
sion of the Coastal Area Manage•
land use planning and, al with
the lead she .said-
rdent Act in WIL Each of the- go
money ttom the fedora govern-
'lbet landa�p:kn is one of the
coastal counties giovernedbyCAMA
men% helps pay for the dfdet
plan rAg toolabwornments have to
ii mgMred to prepare and update
Land use plans wen originally
move toward*Wr gods,' she add.
land uses plans to guide oommtmity
intended for countlee, but, through '
Butvery4 Iacenw 1t with that
growth and use oflaeai load andrva-
time, cities realised their effects an
fi-Of
tvmurstl wan Just as ire-
p r Washington idanti-
The Wsishingtm and the
' Mis. Da
pdrosnt,' ids DaugfnOridga solid
Bed devolopitS the hioWic district
Town odAumrshave hired the Mid-
' •• Xs`just good bunch tes to plan„'::
1
ate a Alsnning.•o�jeetFte is prwviops
East Coutn"on to update their
she said. - `i . t, •
land use plant which implin rigid
land use plans as requiredeveryfivis
Once land use plats are in plod,
rules for buildings in the district
years.
the state uses them when consider -
'But on a day -to day basis some-
Ms. Daughtridge and Connie
i
timer it's vow ilffktilt to follow
Pitts. hild--Blast planning director,
80e LAND UM Page 8A
,-K1r4u1U14 11A1L1 NGWD, MUNUAY, JANU"11 10, LYW
Land
1r1 Page 1
ing permit requests for development
they work Because public services
ture or by man's actions which limit
would be inappropriate. Develop.
ingareasfacedmassdestructionfol-
in the coastal region.
such as roads, water and sewer sys-
the usefulnessofland.For example,
ment constraints are a part ofexist-
lowing Hurricane Hugo. Washing.
tents, schools and public housing de-
low-lying areas along streams are
ing condi tions. They must be cnnsid-
ton and Aurora's land use plans wi11
There are basically three steps in
pend on this information• she said.
subject to flooding. In an area where
ered when planning for. the future,
include ways to deal with such a dis.
—looking
preparinga land use plan —Too
A map showing existing land uses
adequate drainage is not possible,
The existing land use plan and
aster here, she said.
at what exists, making ab-
helps identify problems which may
development should be kept ton mi-
current development policies in the
Washington's 1990 land use plan
out uses of resources and carrying
rrying
already have occurred because of
ninium,notbecausethebuildingin.
twotownswill he examined todeter.
will probably take a close look atwa.
out the plan, Dau hlrid
P g g
the way land has been developed. It
spector doesn't want to issue a per
mine what type of development is
Ter quality. 'Water quality wasn't
Updating present uses of laird'
also helps identify land use pattern,,
mit to someone, but Nv u1se prop.
ieing encouraged.
identified as an issue in the 1985
will also be part oftheeffort.Forer
and trend; over time whI•n elan-
erty losses increase when
After new regulatinosgovernitit.
land use plan, but now it's a hot
ample, its iirt,ortnnt to knew III.w'
;;sired to tm,t rn:l(1;, ni'e said
:e11•lopl!Irrlt 1; :I1i11\\„Il :•i :h1 v
'.I tilt 11;1' p!,1;1; wvre app.e....I I.1.:
topic,' she said.
ninny peopleliveinthe cih'<`uri �i
C,w trwntson.h•ev:.`omin,t.r.
.1•rn;. 11;h,., neearn:c.. n
v:ulv;!, amtannd.n,;
Itenulilrt(:nun:yis alsorequned
iction, where they live a:`;i where
cond:tl.,n. Ivineh eti;t e:[i-_er nl : I
e Ae
.
in formulate a (and ue plan. 'he
1 :u4a,e •:,,v 1. rl; inr i'l, : I,
(ha-11.d :n,.,r I.:
ountV Plan -not due fiw an update
II, •I t .n, I
I •.r* -I' ti I . ,� .. � Ilmi
ihii venr.

May 10, 1990
Washington Daily News
215 North Market Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Please publish the following in y6ur community news section:
The Aurora Planning Board will continue their work on the Aurora
Land Use Plan Update at the next meeting. The agenda will include
discussion on the proposed land classification map. Interested citizens
are invited to attend the meeting Wednesday May 16, 7:00 PM at the
Aurora Town Hall.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions please contact me.
Sincerely,
/
Connie R. Price
Director of Planning
CRP/jda
In P.O. Drawer 1737 Fm Washi; �:g 'n, North Carolina 27889 irvi [phone]

Co' MMISSION
May 10, 1990
The Pamlico News
P.O. Box 510
Oriental, North Carolina 28571
Please publish the following in your community news section:
The Aurora Planning Board will continue their work on the Aurora
Land Use Plan Update at the next meeting. The agenda will include
discussion on the proposed land classification map. Interested citizens
are invited to attend the meeting Wednesday May 16, 7:00 PM at the
Aurora Town Hall.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions please contact me.
Sincerely,
`Connie R. Price
Director of Planning
CRP/jda
III P.O. Dnav:�r ,37 F14, Warftnv"" n, Nkiytn Carolina 27889 0 [phone]

COMMISSION
March 16, 1990
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aurora Planning Board
FROM: Tamara Schatz, Land Use Planner'
RE: March 21, 1990 Land Use Planning Meeting
The next Land Use Planning meeting for Aurora is scheduled for March 21, 1990, at 7:00 PM in
Aurora's Town Hall.
According to our schedule (attached), discussion will entail the identification and mapping of
constraints and hazards leading to a hurricane policy development process. Since Aurora has no
approved evacuation shelters due to the large proportion of land in the floodplain, this will be a
very important exercise.
Land classification is another topic of discussion. Please be familiar with the land classifications
section of the land use planning guidelines (attached) and be ready to identify classification
areas.
.I regret to say I am leaving the Mid -East Commission. Today (Friday the 16th) is my last day.
It has been very enjoyable working with all of you. , Connie Price will be attending the
upcoming meeting. I'm sure it will be a productive one.
TS/ja
Attach.
cc: Connie R. Price, Director of Planning
IN P.O. Drawer 1787 a Washington, North Carolina 27889 Ej [phone]

March 16, 1990
Washington Daily News
ABOUT TOWN
P.O. BOX 1788
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Dear Sirs:
Could you publish the following announcement in an edition of your paper as soon as possible
prior to this meeting?
AURORA - March 21, 1990 at 7:00 PM, the Aurora Plannirig*Boird
will meet at the Town Hall to discuss the updating of the Town's Land
Use Plan All interested citizens are invited to attend and are
encouraged to participate in the updating process.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
Tamara Schatz
Land Use Planner
TSra

March 16, 1990
The Pamlico News
Sally Winfrey
P.O. Box 510
Oriental, North Carolina 28571
Dear Sally:
Enclosed is a schedule of public meetings and a brief news release concerning the Town of
Aurora's 1990 Land Use Plan Update.
In the update process, it is very important to encourage citizen participation. Therefore, I
hope you will be able to publish this newsworthy information.
If you have any questions concerning this material, please feel free to call Connie Price at
the Mid -East Commission at 946-8043.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
Sincerely,
Tamara Schatz
Land Use Planner
TS/ja
Enc.
cc: Connie R. Price, Planner -in -Charge

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
NEWS RELEASE
AURORA UPDATES LAND USE PLAN FOR 1990
The Town of Aurora is currently updating their previous 1986 Land Use Plan by
analyzing growth trends and identifying environmental concerns that will face the
municipality and its surrounding jurisdictional area in the next 5 to 10 years.
Land Use Planning is the core of the planning process. It is a comprehensive plan
that will guide future development and growth for a local government.
The Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) of 1975 requires all coastal counties,
twenty in North Carolina, to formulate and update their land use plans every 5 years.
If you live in the Aurora area, you are welcome to attend the Planning Board's
monthly land use planning meetings. The Board meets every third Wednesday of
the month at 7:00 p.m. in Aurora's Town Hall. The next meeting is scheduled for
March 21, 1990.
RELEASE DATE: Wednesday, March 21, 1990
CONTACT PERSON: Connie R. Price, Director of Planning
Mid -East Commission
P.O. Box 1787
Washington, NC 27889
[phone]
TS/ja
3/16/90 .

COMMISSION
March 16, 1990
The Pamlico News
c/o Salty Winfrey
P.O. Box 510
Oriental, North Carolina 28571
Dear Sally:
Enclosed is a schedule of public meetings and a brief news release concerning the Town of
Aurora's 1990 Land Use Plan Update.
In the update process, it is very important to encourage citizen participation. Therefore, I
hope you will be able to publish this newsworthy information.
If you have any questions concerning this material, please feel free to call Connie Price at
the Mid -East Commission at 946-8043.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
Sincerely,
Tamara Schatz
Land Use Planner
TS/ja
Enc.
cc: Connie. R. Price, Planner -in -Charge
M P.O. Drawer 1787 rig Washington, North Carolina 27889 n [phone] 13

NEWS RELEASE
AURORA UPDATES LAND USE PLAN FOR 1990
The Town of Aurora is currently updating their previous 1986 Land Use Plan by
analyzing growth trends and identifying environmental concerns that will face the
municipality and its surrounding jurisdictional area in the next 5 to 10 years.
Land Use Planning is the core of the planning process. It is a comprehensive plan
that will guide future development and growth for a local government.
The Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) of 1975 requires all,coastal counties,
twenty in North Carolina, to formulate and update their land use plans every 5 years.
If you live in the Aurora area, you are welcome to attend the Planning Board's
monthly land use planning meetings. The Board meets every third Wednesday of
the month at 7:00 p.m. in Aurora's Town Hall. The next meeting is scheduled for
March 21, 1990.
RELEASE DATE: Wednesday, March 21, 1990
CONTACT PERSON: Connie R. Price, Director of Planning
Mid -East Commission
P.O. Box 1787
Washington, NC 27889
[phone]
TS/ja
3/16/90

AURORA LAND USE PLAN UPDATE 1990
SCHEDULE OF PUBLIC MEETINGS
February 21, 1990 7:00 PM
Informative planning video, analyses of data changes and development trends since 1986
plan.
March 21, 1990 7.00 PM
Identification and mapping of constraints and hazards leading to a Hurricane Policy
Development Process. Discussion on land use and land classification maps.
April 18, 1990 7:00 PM
Discussion on water quality concerns. Preparation of policy statements and
implementation actions.
May 16, 1990 7.00 PM
Conclude land use planning process.
Meetings are being held by Aurora's planning commission at the Town Hall each
month. They invite citizen input in the planning process and all meetings are open to
the public. Meeting topics may be subject to change.
1
2/S/90

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
COMMISSION
February 8, 1990
Washington Daily News
About Town
P.O. Box 1788
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Dear Sirs:
Could you publish the following announcement in an edition of your paper sometime before
February 21, 1990?
AURORA - February 21, 1990, at 7:00 AM, the Aurora Planning Board
will meet at the Town Hatt to discuss the updating of the Town's land
Use Plan. All interested citizens are invited and encouraged to participate
in the updating process.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
I
L�Q/1L�
WASHINGTON LIAILY NEWS, TUESD Y, BR RY'20 i
Tamara Schatz
:;Aurora _ Land -Use Plan`.Up�
Land Use Planner
date, schedule of public'meetings,
held by Aurora's planning commis=
sion, Town Hall: Feb: 21, �Tp. n.; In-
formative planning video; analyses
TS/)a
of: data changes and development.
CC: Robert J. Paciocco, Executive
Director trends since 1986 plan*-; arch 24' 7
p.m., Identification and mapping of_.
constraints and hazards leading to a
Hurricane Policy Development Pro-3
'cess Discussion" one land; use,; and
bland classification maps:,Apn1 �18,.?
1p,a ; Discuss1on`on water. quality
concerns '<<Preparation;: Hof policy,
`statements an`d iniplementation ac-
tions: May 16, ? p.I,m Conclude land
- 0 P.O. Drawer 1787 M Washington,
North Carolir,'•q planning process. Citizen iVAll .
ins the planning process,invited. All y
'meetings°open to public. l``

NOTICE OF, M6M F ARWO
The Yown of Aurora wid t�id a hpeirla Mon-.
, $epternbera isagt 917lne p
os
orW drift is
ague for public.inspec4on in-ihe. office o the
Tawn Cleric at tiw Town Fled and in teofka e
'all
Exam" Dfeaorof the W-East Cmissi
j
wdq $gtl81B in WmMvlom In the absence of
'
further rev�siorts, ,the, plan W,tm Saopted by die
To►mCourre and: submnted.to,the , Ar
sourceCommasron r$tatecer0mlipn'Thisglan
'con*s p* stalerri 0 inn the area of Resotme ,
Protection, Resource Production and Management,
. � aW ty Development �
wad serve as a generPal�pucidePoWm brt�de lopment
A.wAhGt.the Townes over the,next tnw (S
ears. $t8te pemats ; �h� c .
��
theCoastet Areatnaoageq*MM(CAMA '
u,t+`ri_t' ' be�'prerdcated ran the podr+y statement � '
.� 1C
'
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Town of Aurora will hold a hewin Mon-
o fa Sen tember 9,.1991 at 7. for rpose
heari g public corttmerttS on a proposed LAND
USE PLAN UPDATE A Dopy o1 the frtal draft is
available for public inspecftort in the office of Ilse
Town Clerk at the Town Haq and in the office of the
Executive Director the Mid -East Comm�sion at 1
'
Harding Square in Washington. In the absence of
further revtsions, the plan.will be adopted by tie
Town Council and submitted to the Coesid
Rb.
source Commission for State certification. Thisplan
contains poky statements In the areas of Resource
Protection, Resource Production and Management,
Economic and Comm Develo Slorrn Ha-
zard Mitagation, and P c motion. The Plan
w serve as a general for devebpment
guideline
within the Towns jurisdiction over the nett fm (5)
YOMQ. State
p8haft
Area -.' nt issued
bou' .ado be' martagementAct(CAMA)
predicated on the policy statement odf
ft p�
&8 1 tc
PA/1

NOTK%E OF PUBLIC HEARWG
The Town of Aurora will faWMna
hearing Mon. -
day, September 9,1991 at r to purpose
of heann is comments no
of LAND
USE UPDATE A ccpy of the anal draft is
available br public inspection in, the office of the
the Town Clerk at Town Hall and in the office of the
Executive Director of the Mid -East Commission at t
Harding Square in Washington. In the absence.of
further revisions, the plan will be adopted by the
Town Council and submitted to the CoasW Re-
source Commission for State codliicalion. This plan
contains poky statemems in eas of Resource
Protection, Resource ProduF
Management,
Economic and Communiri entStorm Ha=
zard Mitigation; and Publicics ion. The Plan
will serve as a general guideline- development 1
within the Town's jurisdiction over the next five (5),
years. State permits for development issued
throepah the Coastal Area management Act (CAMA)
w ado be predicated on the policy statement of
this plan
BEAUFORT COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
Before the undersigned,'a Notary
Public of said County and State, duly
commissioned, qualified and authorize
by law to administer oaths, personall
appeared-SUSAN B. FUTRELL, who being
first duly sworn, deposes and says
that sheds the Vice -President of The
Washington News Publishing Company
engaged -in- the- publicati-orr -of- a- news-
paper known.as t_he.Washington Daily
News, published, issued and entered
as second class mail in the City of
Washington, in said County and State;
that she is authorized.to make this
affidavit and sworn statement; that
the.notice or other legal advertise-
ment,_a true copy of which is attach-
ed hereto, was published in The Wash-
ington Daily News on the following
days:
3
and that the said newspaper in which
such notice, paper, document, or
legal advertisement was published was
at the time of each and every such
publication, a newspaper meeting all
of the requirements and qualification
of Section- 1-547- of the General
Statutes of North Carolina and was,a
qualified newspaper within the meanin
of Section 1-597 of the General
Statutes.of North Ca olina.
This ... ).!..day o ......,19.L
Signature of persoe making affida
Sworn to and subscribed Gbefore me,
G
this .... 11..day of...��:•..,19.1�.
of y__-Public
My commission- expires