Recreation and Open Space Plan-1998

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
DCM COPY DCM COPY
j lease do not remove!!!!!
Division of Coastal M
anagemeut
0 co��
�yy
N T 1,T
y/ r
ri Ir
1998 Pender County
Recreation and Open Space Plan

0
H
1998 PENDER COUNTY
RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE PLAN
Pender County Board of Commissioners
F. D. Rivenbark, Chairman
Carolyn H. Justice, Vice Chairman
Stephen C. Holland
Cleveland Simpson
Dwight Strickland
John Bauer, County Manager
Pender County Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
Pat Thomas, Chairman
Alice Cavin
Kenneth Keith
Terry Lanning
Angus Phillips
Marilyn Stonestreet
Daniel Wastler
Thurman C. Hardison, Parks and Recreation Director
1 Technical Assistance
Howard T. Capps C Associates, Inc.
' Land Planning • Landscape Architecture
201 N. Front Street, Suite 402, Wilmington, N.C. 28401
' The preparation of this document was financed in part through a grant provided by the North Carolina
Coastal Management Program, through funds provided by the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as
amended, which is administered by the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National
' Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Table of Contents
Page
I.
Introduction
1
A. Benefits of Parks and Recreation
1
B. Demand for Parks and Recreation
2
C. Purpose of Master Plan
2
II.
Goals and Objectives
3
A. Goal
3
B. Objectives
3
III.
Population/Growth Trends for Pender County
4
IV.
Current and Projected Physical Factors
6
A. Existing Land Use
6
B. Topography/Soils
13
C. Highways
13
D. Physical Barriers
17
E. Water Resources/100-Year Flood Area
19
V.
Inventory of Existing Facilities/Existing Programs and Staff
22
A. Existing Pender County Parks
22
B. School Sites
25
C. Private Recreation Facilities
28
D. Existing County Recreation Programs/Staff
29
VI.
Park Facility Standards
30
VII.
Assessment of Needs/Local Demand
33
1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan

A. Need for Park Land Based on Standards 33
B. Community Input on Park and Recreation Priorities 39
VIII. Future Site Locations 41
IX. Action Plan to Meet Unmet Needs 42
A. Facility Development 42
B. Land Acquisition 44
C. Staffing 45
E. Operating Budget 45
X. Funding Sources 45
Appendix — Schematic Park Plans, Sites 1-14 50
tr%
Map 1
Existing Parks and Schools
11
Map 2
Existing Land Use Map
12
Map 3
Current and Projected Physical Factors
15
Map 4
Town of Burgaw Thoroughfare Plan
16
Map 5
Potential Water Resource Access
18
Map 6
100-Year Flood Area Map
21
Map 7
Proposed and Undeveloped Parks
43
Map 8
Potential 26-Mile Rail -Trail
44
1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan

I. INTRODUCTION
The Pender County Parks and Recreation Department offers County residents a variety of
recreational opportunities. These opportunities range from organized sporting activities such
as softball and baseball leagues to the use of neighborhood parks such as Pender Memorial
Park.
Although the County has limited park facilities with much of the land area currently
'
undeveloped, there is substantial County interest in and support by the County Commissioners
for providing more and improved recreational opportunities for Pender County citizens.
'
During the land use planning process in 1991, the County established a policy to support
recreational opportunities in the County as financially feasible. The 1991 Land Use Plan also
included a policy to pursue improved public access to the County's rivers, creeks, streams and
'
tributaries through utilization of State or federal funds that might be used for recreational
facility acquisition and development.
In February, 1991, the Pender County Recreation Advisory Board was established by the
County Commissioners to pursue the planning and development of a sound recreation and
parks program for Pender County.
In 1993, Pender County prepared a Waterfront Access Plan which provided an inventory of
waterfront property throughout the County with water access for recreational use. During this
planning process, the plan identified recreational opportunities utilizing the old abandoned
CSX railroad corridor which extends from Willard and Rock Fish Creek at the north end of the
County to the Northeast Cape Fear River as a potential rail -trail. This plan alsoidentified a
' 33-acre site with recreation potential east of U.S. 117 and fronting on the Northeast Cape Fear
River and adjacent to the abandoned CSX railroad line that was owned by the North Carolina
Department of Transportation. This property has since been donated to Pender County
following a request for such action by the County Commissioners.
In August, 1995, the County appointed its first Recreation Coordinator who, working with the
County Commissioners, reestablished the Pender County Recreation Advisory Board on
October 12, 1995. Since 1995, funding to support recreational opportunities through
volunteer -operated programs and community partnerships continued to increase, and County
efforts to obtain an 82-acre donation of land for recreational purposes was successfully
completed. A master plan for the site showing proposed improvements has also been
completed. The preparation of this Recreation and Open Space Plan shows the continued
support the County Commissioners have shown for recreation in Pender County.
' A. Benefits of Parks and Recreation
Well -planned park facilities and recreation programs can have a number of positive
impacts throughout the community. For the individual, parks can provide relief from
the stress of everyday life and provide an opportunity for exercise which is important in
1
1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan

L
maintaining good health. Parks also contribute to the neighborhood or community by
providing a setting for social interaction, thus fostering community awareness.
Besides their psychological and social value, appropriately planned and sited parks and
open space also have economic benefits to the community. Parks have the potential to
raise the property value of nearby real estate. Additionally, companies considering
locating a business in a community often consider quality -of -life issues including parks
and recreation facilities and programs.
Finally, parks and recreation provide environmental benefits. Large tracts of land are
often left in a relatively undisturbed natural state, thereby fostering environmental
diversity and preservation.
B. Demand for Parks and Recreation
Parks and recreation literature often cites increased leisure time and increased affluence
as factors encouraging greater participation in recreational activities in the United
States, and thus greater demand for parks and recreation. At the beginning of the
twentieth century, the industrial worker typically worked 56 hours a week, usually
without paid holidays or vacations. Such is not the case today. With holidays and paid
vacations, the typical worker today enjoys 20 to 28 "bonus days" per year, while the
standard work week has been shortened to 40 hours or less. Thus, workers have more
free time for recreation.
Increased affluence has contributed to increased demand for recreation. Between the
' end of World War II and the early 1970's, real income (adjusted for inflation) doubled.
This increased affluence, coupled with increased vacation and shorter work weeks, has
encouraged greater participation in recreation among Americans. Since Pender County
is one of the fastest growing counties in North Carolina, County officials can anticipate
increased interest in more and improved recreation facilities and programs.
Population, demographics and trends in lifestyles may also affect the amount and type
of recreation and parks which are demanded. The ever-increasing population creates
an increased demand, causing existing parks to become over -used. Demographic
trends may dictate the types of recreation which are demanded. Examples include the
aging of the American population, and increasing number of single adults living alone
or with children.
Finally, lifestyle changes, including the increasing interest in physical fitness and
increasing environmental awareness, have contributed to the demand for parks and
recreation and open space.
C. Purpose of the Master Plan
1 1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan 2

The purpose of the Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan is to determine the
recreation objectives, needs and priorities of the citizens of Pender County. The plan
' should serve as a long-range, comprehensive policy guide for public decisions related
to the scope, quality, and location of park and recreation facilities, and make
recommendations concerning their acquisition, development or upgrading of existing
park facilities.
The Master Plan has been organized into nine major parts:
' 1. Introduction
2. Goals and Objectives
' 3. Population/Growth Trends for Pender County
4. Current -and Projected Physical Factors
' 5. Inventory of Existing Facilities/Existing Programs and Staff
6. Park Facility Standards
7. Assessment of Needs/Local Demand
8. Future Site Locations
9. Act Plan to Meet Unmet Needs
' H. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Goals and objectives provide direction and structure for the formulation of the Master Plan.
' Additionally, goals and objectives can help define policies and aid in the decision -making
during the implementation phase of the plan. A successful parks and recreation system for
Pender County will require long-term commitment and coordinated action to achieve the
' following goal and objectives.
A. .jUd
The goal of this plan is to provide the citizens, elected officials and staff of Pender
County with a 5- to 20-year course of action that addresses the recreation needs of
' County citizens and provides an economically attainable timetable for administering,
developing, and acquiring parks and recreation resources and facilities.
B. Objectives
1. To accurately identify existing and projected needs for parks and recreation
land.
2. To ensure the Master Plan is responsive to Pender County's projected long-
range needs and yet adequately flexible so as to allow it to be updated to
respond to unexpected changes in population and government finances.
3. To involve the public in planning and implementation by:
1 1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan

a) the use of public meetings;
b) making the plan accessible and understandable.
4. To ensure the Master Plan is consistent with other plans and ordinances,
including policy in recently completed Land Use Plans for Pender County and
the 1993 Pender County Waterfront Access Plan, and complements the facilities
and programs provided by other public, private and voluntary agencies.
5. To provide conveniently located recreation facilities to serve the needs of
Pender County's children, teenagers and adults, including handicapped,
economically disadvantaged and elderly.
6. To identify mechanisms for funding of acquisitions and development of park
facilities.
7. To make optimum utilization of the County's outstanding natural resources in
developing a variety of leisure opportunities for Pender County citizens.
M. POPULATION/GROWTH TRENDS FOR PENDER COUNTY
The 1990 census for Pender County showed a County population of 28,855 people. The
Office of State Planning shows a projected population for Pender County by the year 2000 of
39,694. This represents an anticipated increase of 10,839 people over ten years, which would
be a 21.6% increase in population. Based on Office of State Planning projections, Pender
County is projected to grow from 39,694 in 2000 to 48,251 by the year 2010, which represents
an additional 21.6% population increase. Another increase of 17.2% is projected between
2010 and 2020.
Exhibit 1
Pender County Population
1960 —2020
56,553
50,000 "'
48,251 -
45,000
i
i
40,000 �
39,694
35,000
30,000
28855
25,000
22,107
20,000
18,508 18,149
15,000
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
1 1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan 4

Source: 1960 — 1990 Census Data
2000 through 2020, Office of State Planning
Exhibit 2 below reflects changes in population by township based on census information.
Exhibit 2
Changes in Population by Township
Population % Change
Townshfo 1980 120 Ittcceart< 1980 _ 90
'+
:.•. •tL.S�.....,,,.�,.,M:.v„mm,,,v.,„mmm„�;::::,�.':.....wR�s::;k::5:;::;!.,,�X:t�-,n2=:;:�:8:::'�,�;;:.,,m.,�,„?�,:taa:Jc:;a:r�::w:;K•a:
Canetuck
330
369
+ 39
.J:,';'"<t„•.y.".M;;;i•'';ii.:i�:'r"5,,,�',•avc:;�. .......
+11.8
Caswell
996
1,016
+ 20
+ 2.0
Columbia
1,740
1,790
+ 50
+ 2.9
Grady
1,360
1,725
+365
+26.8
Holly
1,684
2,095
+411
+24.4
Long Creek
1,158
1�280
+122
+10.5
x:.;::;.;...;,:.;;::.,;.;.v.::::i,:;.;...:::?a::.::ca.:;:...;.;.,;..,,:;.;•.,,,;.::;,;,•::::,;.,;t..;.,;.;?.1;,..,,....:::..,•::..,.„.::..•.wm:oxax:::o:xt:,::;.:..:.�.•:•:.v., •. ,,•.,•.„.....,..::.. , ,v., ,.„„.:.„m„•.• „v : :.,.,..,.
,}
...�t3.fib:�::::;%:`•::.:::'£•.`:?::<`::=P��}}:. .{ , v z'::`y.:i';:::r``.�' ' ;•�t�:,'-}::.;;;v.:::
Yt
.;:iEitiiti•in,}}:%?_:;i:L?•:itv�5.'•:4;::?-:-::-i:-:,k•:..-::.v::i.::..
w
-:::.::...>••r:•:x•::•:x?t•:::::.;;.y..;.::::rt•:.a.::�•::::.;;.;•::�.:�•o:::?:�:�:t`::-::-x";`-::.Qr3;:`-.:::.::<-::.:t:'S:::..tv:?•::a:•:::•::.y>-._t ... ..,,•.,•.,-.,•:::::::..,: ..... ......... .. ..... .:.�'•:.:t.¢
••
Union
3.443
::.:.:::.::a;M,xt„aa;aa,M.•.a•..,
3.285
.,„wa,vmav:;::ti�;:a:;�,v
-158
v v..•.v:,�.•..,xv:.,v.,m•?.t,,,o.:... v: ... vy
_ 4•8
' Totals 22,107 28,855 +6,748 +30.5
Source: U.S. Census (See Township Map in Appendix)
Exhibit 2 reflects that based on absolute numbers from Census information by Township for
1980 and 1990, Topsail Township grew by 3,888 people over this ten-year period. Rocky
Point grew by 1,436 people and Burgaw Township grew by 575 people during this same
period. Map #1 reflects the location of these three townships that have had the largest increase
in population based on absolute numbers between 1980 and 1990.
' The Exhibit shows that Topsail and Rocky Point Townships have experienced the largest
percentage of increase in population between 1980 and 1990.
The significant population growth in Topsail Township, 86.1% between 1980 and 1990, has
continued since 1980 due to the very attractive developments along and adjacent to the
' Intracoastal Waterway and within a relatively short drive to Wahnington for urban services
such as shopping and entertainment. Large developments at Scotts Hill, Washington Acres,
Olde Point, Belvedere Plantation and Deerfield, which have many undeveloped parcels
' remaining, will most likely ensure that this portion of the County will continue to grow. In
addition to these developments, new areas that have recently opened between U.S. 17 and the
Intracoastal Waterway such as Bay Harbour, Virginia Creek Forest, Gabes Point, Deer Run,
Topsail Green, Cedar Landing and others will provide additional single family lots for
development. Substantial commercial growth is taking place in Hampstead as well, and will
most likely continue following completion of the U.S. 17 widening.
The Rocky Point Township experienced the second largest increase in population between
1980 and 1990, at 74.0%. Again, this area has good access to both U.S. 117 and N.C. 210,
1 1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan 5

1
' and to I-40. Since 1980 this area has continued to grow, with many mobile home
developments being located in this part of the County.
In planning for future recreational facilities, it is important to consider the location of current
and projected population. As reflected in Exhibit 1, the Office of State Planning projects a
' doubling of County population between 1990 and the year 2020, from 28,855 to 56,553.
A review of Exhibit 2 shows that the three townships located adjacent to the urban area of
' Wilmington and New Hanover County or I-40, specifically Topsail, Rocky Point and Burgaw,
have experienced the largest increase in population from 1980 to 1990, and this trend will most
likely continue into the future.
IV. CURRENT AND -PROJECTED PHYSICAL FACTORS
' Prior to looking at potential recreation sites for Pender County, a review of physical factors
that affect the location of park sites needs to be made. This review includes existing land use,
topography/soils, existing and future highway locations, physical barriers and water resources.
A. Existing Land Use
' 1. Topsail Township
' Topsail Township has been the fastest growing township in the County,
primarily due to the Township's location in relation to the Atlantic Ocean and
Intracoastal Waterway. The Township has grown from 4,515 people in 1980 to
8,403 in 1990, which is an 86.1% increase over ten years.
Single-family residences are located along S.R. 1571 at Scotts Hill, with water
' access for boats at Scotts Hill Marina. A large area between Scotts Hill and
Washington Acres is wooded and undeveloped. Development along S.R. 1614
and 1616 between Hampstead and the Intracoastal Waterway is a combination
' of conventional homes and mobile homes. Whitebridge, a 300-acre single-
family development south of Hampstead is a large home, large lot development.
Both Olde Point and Belvedere Plantation are very attractive planned
communities surrounding golf course facilities. The development along S.R.
1575 at the waterfront is a relatively high -density single-family development
with rather small lots. Also at the waterfront, a marina and boat ramp has been
developed as part of the Belvedere community. Continuing north on U.S. 17,
the next major development is Topsail Green, which is an attractive mobile
home development around an 18-hole golf course.
' State Roads 1561, 1564, and 1578 have a combination of conventional and
mobile home developments on single lots.
1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan 6

Virginia Creek Forest, off of S.R. 1560, and Deer Run and Cedar Landing, near
N.C. 50, are large, primarily mobile home developments. Gabes Point is a
' larger residential development with entrance from N.C. 50 at the entrance to the
Surf City and Topsail Beach bridge.
' See Map 1, Existing Parks and Schools Map, for location of existing parks and
schools.
'
Topsail Township includes the following park and school sites:
Park Site 1
Surf City Family Park
Park Site 2
Edgecombe Community Center
Park Site 3
Topsail Ball Club
'
Park Site 16
School Site 1
Holly Shelter Game Land (Portion)
North Topsail High School
School Site 2
Topsail High School
School Site 3
Topsail Middle School
'
School Site 4
South Topsail Elementary School
2. Rocky Point Township
Rocky Point Township has experienced the second fastest growth rate in the
'
County from 1980 to 1990, with a 74.0% increase in population. This
represents an
increase of 1,436 people or 561 new households over ten years
The Rocky Point Township is rural in character with residential land use being
concentrated along each side of U.S. 117 North and south of N.C. 210.
Residential development is also found on both sides of N.C. 210 west and east
of the intersection at U.S. 117.
Rocky Point Township includes the following park and school sites:
' Park Site 14 Miller Pond Park (Undeveloped)
Pe )
School Site 5 Rocky Point Elementary School
3. C netuck Township
Canetuck Township has grown from 330 people in 1980 to 369 people in 1990,
or an 11.8% increase in population between 1980 and 1990 which represents an
iincrease of 39 people over ten years.
This township is bordered by the Cape Fear River, Colly Creek and Black
River, with most of the township being in the 100-year flood area. There is
very little farmland being cultivated and only scattered residential development.
1
1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan 7

1
This township does not contain any existing park or school sites.
4. Grady Township
Grady Township has grown from 1,360 people in 1980 to 1,725 people in 1990
which is a 26.8% increase in population between 1980 and 1990 of 365 people
over ten years.
Much of the residential development in this township is concentrated in the
Currie Community. Other residential development is scattered along U.S. 421,
S.R. 1113, 1120 and 1115. Commercial development is scattered throughout
the township.
Grady Township includes the following park and school sites:
Park Site 10 Long Creek Community Center
(Long Creek Grandy School)
School Site 9 Malpass Corner Elementary School
5. Caswell Township
Caswell Township has grown from 996 people in 1980 to 1,016 people in 1990,
an increase of 20 people, or 2.0% over ten years.
Like Canetuck Township, much of Caswell Township along the Black River is
subject to flooding. Residential and commercial land use is concentrated in the
Town of Atkinson. The remaining residential development is scattered along
S.R. 1100, 1201, 1102 and N.C. 53.
Caswell Township includes the following park or school sites:
Park Site 11 Atkinson Playground
Park Site 12 Old Atkinson School Playground and Gymnasium
Park Site 15 Moores Creek National Battlefield
6. Long Creek Township
Long Creek has grown from 1,158 people in 1980 to 1,280 in 1990, a 10.5%
increase in population from 1980 to 1990, or 122 people over ten years.
Long Creek is very rural in character, with the only concentrated residential
development at the intersection of S.R. 1400 and N.C. 210, which is the Long
Creek Community. Other residential units are located primarily along S.R.
1408, 1409 and 1402.
1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan

IThere are no park sites or school sites in Long Creek Township.
' 7. Columbia Township
Columbia Township has grown from 1,740 people in 1980 to 1,790 people in
' 1990, a 2.9% increase in population, or 50 people over ten years.
This township contains some of the County's prime farmland. Much of the
residential development is concentrated along U.S. 421. Other residential
development is also found along S.R. 1216, 1206 and N.C. 53.
Columbia Township contains the following park sites:
' School Site 10 West Pender Middle School
8. Union Township
1
During the period from 1980 to 1990 this township has lost population from
3,443 people in 1980 to 3,285 people in 1990, a 4.8% decrease in population,
which represents 158 fewer people over this ten-year period.
Union Township, located in the northwestern section of the County, contains
the communities of Penderlea, Willard and Watha. Residential and commercial
uses are concentrated along U.S. 117, N.C. 11 and along roads leading to or
near the communities of Penderlea, Willard and Watha. The I-40 thoroughfare,
with an access point to Willard at U.S. 117, is a major land use impacting
Pender County in this area, and has potential for commercial growth at I-40 and
the U.S. 117 intersection. The remaining portion of this part of the County is
wooded or agricultural in use.
This township includes the following park and school sites:
Park Site 5
Willard Community Center
Park Site 6
Watha Community Center
School Site 11
Penderlea Elementary School
9. Burgaw Township
From 1980 to 1990 Burgaw Township grew from 4,940 people in 1980 to
5,515 people in 1990, an 11.6% increase in population or 575 people over ten
years.
Burgaw, the County's largest municipality, is located near the center of this
Township. Residential, commercial and institutional land uses are concentrated
inside the Town limits of Burgaw, with strip residential and commercial
1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan

1
development being located along major thoroughfares such as U.S. 117, N.C.
53, and other state roads. I-40 and N.C. 53 intersect near Burgaw and provide
greatly improved access to Burgaw from the northern and southern part of the
County and to adjacent New Hanover County and Wilmington, and to points
north.
This township contains the following park and school sites:
Park Site 7
Park Site 8
Park Site 9
Park Site 13
School Site 6
School Site 7
School Site 8
10. Holly Township
Harrell Park
Pender Memorial Park
Historic Burgaw Depot
82-Acre County Park (Undeveloped)
Burgaw Middle School
Burgaw Elementary School
Pender High School
Holly Township has grown from 1,684 people in 1980 to 2,095 people in 1990,
a 24.4% growth rate, or an addition of 411 people during the ten-year period.
The Holly Township is a very rural part of the County, with mostly residential
and some commercial development being concentrated near Maple Hill.
Additional residential development is located along Highway 53. The
remaining land area is forested areas, open fields, or agricultural land, and the
Angola Bay Game Land at the northern edge of the township.
This township contains the following park sites:
Park Site 4 Maple Hill Community Center
Park Site 16 Holly Shelter Game Land (Portion)
Park Site 17 Angola Bay Game Land
In summary, Pender County has a low density of development in most areas with
extensive forested areas and agricultural areas throughout the County. Most residential
and commercial development is located in municipalities or along highway
thoroughfares leading to municipalities or communities. The fastest growing portion of
the County is Topsail Township, including Topsail Beach, Surf City and the area
between U.S. 17 and the Intracoastal Waterway. Rocky Point and Burgaw Townships
are the second and third fastest growing areas based on 1980 and 1990 Census data.
1
1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan 10

Map # 2
Existing Land Use Map
Pender County Recreation & Open Space Plan
Pender County, North Carolina
►A
Residential
o do Associates, Inc.
t..+..y. Ar.ew.i..
sm r.Ki F." rwa..dt..oa
Vuft.w 6a,C n.m
a
Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan
Map # 1
Existing Parks & Schools
Pender County Recreation & Open Space Plan
Pender County, North Carolina
Legend
Potential Rail —Trail (26 miles)
®
1/4 Mile Service Area
3 Mile Service Area
Community Park
15 Mile Service Area
District Park
PEMOER COMITY SCHOOLS
PI. ROM TOPSAIL ELEMENTARY SCHRDOL
(2. TOPSAIL HIGH SCHOOL
A TOPSAIL MIDDLE SCOOL
H• SOUTH TOPSAIL ELEMENTARY
^ ROCIRY POHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
/S. BURGAN DOLE SOM
p. MUIRGAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
EN. FENDER HIGH SCHOOL
ft MAIPASS DORMER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
"0, VEST PEIDER MDOLE SCHOOL
P. PENHXRLEA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
®.ARM SHE LOU,K7N5
SHE /T. ww Cm r—Y PARK
SITE 02. ED(ECOM BE COMMRIIKTY CENTER
SITE p. TOPSAIL MALL —
SITE µ MAPLE HILL COMMUNITY CENTER
SITE µ HILARD COMMUNITY CENTER
SITE /S. NATHA COMM UN W CENTER
SITE A HA RI"U PARK
SITE ^ PEDER MEMORIAL PARK
SITE P. HISTORIC BIRR"W DEPOT
SITE /10. LONG CREEK COMMUNITY CENTER SITE nH. ATKRRON MUNICIPAL PARK
SUE /Iz OLD ATKINSON SCHOOL PLAYGROUND III GYM
P.-STE /IS. PENCOUNTY DISTRICT PARK
0.-SITE nA MILER POND RK PA
FIE nj• MOORCS CREEK MATMAL MATTLEIRD
SITE f I& HOLLY SHEL M R GAME LA
SITE n7. ANGOLA MAY GAME LARD
..-DISTRICT PARK (UNDEVELOPED)
K.-COMMUNITY PARK (UNDEVELOPED)
Howard T. Capps & Associates, Inc.
eLn RHHo h..L RLA..L R.R. AM
RPRo c.,am. 25AM
lQ0) HSJ-T70R
i

B. Toljogrghy/Soils
Soil type and topography of land is a major factor when considering the location for
future park land. The Soil Survey of Pender County includes a table on pages 116 —
118 that evaluates the suitability of County soils for various recreational uses such as
camp areas, picnic areas, playgrounds and paths and trails. Based on a review of this
table, the following soils are considered suitable for the uses shown below, with the
extent of limitations indicated. For example, Aycock soil (AyB2) has moderate
limitations for camp area and playgrounds but slight limitations for picnic areas and
trails; however, this soil has a slope of between 3% and 6%, which might further limit
its use for anything other than picnic areas and trails without extensive work to change
existing grades on site. This table and the County soils report and tax maps can give
the Parks and Recreation Director, Recreation Committee and local officials a good
source of information in considering site -specific locations for future County park
facilities.
Exhibit 3
Soil Suitability
Area Picnic Playground Tra' % Slope
Ata Altavista
Severe
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
0-3
AyA Aycock
Moderate
Slight
Moderate
Slight
0-3
AyB2 Aycock
Moderate
Slight
Moderate
Slight
3-6
EmA Exu n
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Slight
0-2
EuA Exum
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Slight
0-2
Fo Foreston
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Slight
GoA Goldsboro
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Slight
0-2
Pender Pender
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
0-2
Jo Johns
Severe
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
KaA Kalmia
Slight
Slight
Slight
Slight
0-2
NoA Norfolk
Slight
Slight
Slight
Slight
0-2
NoB Norfolk
Slight
Slight
Moderate
Slight
2-6
On Onslow
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
0-2
' Source: Soil Survey of Pender County, N.C.
C. Highways
' Pender County covers a very large geographic area with a dispersed residential
population. Since most County residents depend on individual automobiles for
' transportation, placing future parks adjacent to or near major thoroughfares is an
important factor in future site selection. For that reason, the 1998 Thoroughfare Plan
Study Technical Report for Pender County was reviewed. The report has divided the
1
1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan 13

County road system into four major road categories which are interstate, other
principal arterial, minor arterial and major collector. In the Town of Burgaw, the road
' system has been divided into freeway, urban major thoroughfare and urban minor
thoroughfare.
The only interstate serving Pender County is I-40, which runs north -south near the
center of the County, with interchange access at Willard (U.S. 117), Burgaw (N.C. 53),
and Rocky Point (N.C. 210). The Thoroughfare Plan calls for a future interchange
' south of the N.C. 53 Burgaw exit to connect the proposed major thoroughfare south of
Burgaw. The plan also shows a future interchange at Stag Park Road (S.R. 1509) and
' I-40.
The other principal arterial is U.S. 17 on the eastern side of the County. This road
' connects Pender County to New Hanover County to the south and Onslow County to
the north.
The only minor arterial for Pender County is US 421 located in the western portion of
the County. This thoroughfare connects Pender with New Hanover County to the
south and Sampson County to the north. Other major thoroughfares in Pender County
' are considered major collectors and include highways 50, 210, 133, 117 and 53.
The only proposed road changes called for in the Thoroughfare Plan include the
' Hampstead by-pass of U.S. 17 and realignment of highway 210 in two locations east of
the Northeast Cape Fear River. '
' In Burgaw, the plan calls for a freeway (N.C. 53 by-pass) on the north side of Burgaw
which, as currently planned, may adversely impact on the 82-acre proposed County
park (Park Site 13). A major thoroughfare is also called for south of Burgaw, with
' interchange connection at I-40. This thoroughfare would provide improved access to
Pender Memorial Park (Park Site 8). The final proposed improvement is a minor
thoroughfare connection between N.C. 53 near I-40 and Stag Park Road. (See Map 3
' of County and Burgaw Major Thoroughfare System, Map 4.)
1
1
1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan 14

m
b
CD
ti
0
R
A
(a
A
w
0
A
w
0
p
-e
w
0
m
^a
p
Map #3
Current & Projected Physical Factors
Pender County Recreation & Open Space Plan
Pender County, North Carolina
In two locations
oughfare Plan
Into I&toto
Other Principal Arterial
Minor Arterial
Major Collector
fhorouphiaro Plan
Aa p
is
rd T. Capps & Associates, Inc.
wi�r. w.0 iuwm. �ee.m
�r�o� »srRe

!♦
~ 1 \ \
11 0.
us —117 .
1 �
(PLANNED NC 53 BYPASS) /
1 \ Freeway' , Urban Major Thorougfare
a /
NEW
••fir ■w
$ O IL
00 IN
SR 1345 �� / - ` ' NC- 53 1 t
1
82 ACRE
1•~oE ♦ PARK
y,y HARREL -
A { PARK \ 1
1.
• t w000S Ao
Fr sooH W / , O ♦
/ US -117
�' I
\�
1 \ NC-53 Future Interchange
to
\ \ / la••
Urban Major �. / J r �►I•
Thoroughfare r M Jim, r■
PENDER MEMORIAL PARK
Map # 4
Howard T. Capps & Associates, Inc.
Town of Burgaw
4M Il.n h 4N.e.y..uce,bN.... Pender County Recreation & Open Space Plan
ml " roel St— s�.� .o1 SOURCE: PENDER COUNTY THOROUGFARE PLAN
nlmiNme. xenn armu.. ze.ol
Iriol ie�-noe Ponder rnimty Alnrfh rnrollnrt

D. Physical Barriers
In determining the best location for future park sites, physical barriers have been
considered. This can include severe slopes, high water table or rock outcroppings.
' Table 4 of the County Soils Report indicates that Aycock loam (AyB2) has a slope of
3% to 6%, while Norfolk loamy fine sand (NoB) has a slope of 2% to 6%. All other
soils identified earlier as being suitable for camp areas, picnic areas, playgrounds and
' trails have a slope of 2% or less. Only the Aycock and Norfolk loamy exceed 2%,
making this soil type better for picnic areas and trails, but not necessarily suitable for
camping or playgrounds. Refer to the preceding exhibit for percent of slope for each
' soil type.
Another factor that can impact on the suitability of a site for recreation is a high water
' table. The Soil Survey of Pender County in Table 16 provides information on
frequency of flooding and depth to water table by soil type. Soils discussed in an
earlier section as being suitable for recreational use such as camping, picnic areas,
playgrounds and paths and trails have been listed below with indication of flooding
frequency and depth to water table.
Exhibit 4
Flooding Frequency and Depth to Water Table
Based on information shown above, Altavista (AtA), Pender, Johns (Jo) and Onslow
(On) all have a water table within 1.5 to 3.0 below surface. Also, Altavista and Johns
are subject to flooding on rare occasions.
1 1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan 17

m m m m m m m m m m m
Map # 5
Potential Water Resource Access
Pender County Recreation & Open Space Plan
Pender County, North Carolina
210 Bridge (Private)
210 Bridge (Privatal
it SR 1520 Bridge (Private)
k at SR 1520 Bridge (Private)
k at SR 1520 Bridge (Private)
ar River at NC 53 Bridge (Private)
id of SR 1560 (R/W)
Park (Private)
1583 (Private)
d T. Capps tr Associates. Inc.

I
H
1
I
I
I
11
1
E. Water Resources/100-Year Flood Area
Pender County has numerous rivers, creeks and tributaries but no waterfront park
facility other than the recently -acquired Miller Pond site located on the Northeast Cape
Fear River east of U.S. 117 at the Pender/New Hanover County line. In 1993, Pender
County prepared a Waterfront Access Plan which identified land areas with different
levels of waterfront access potential from canoe launch areas to County waterfront
parks. Based on a review of this plan, the following potential waterfront park sites
have been identified; however, since many if not all of these sites are privately owned,
development of a County park on any site would require land purchase or long-term
lease. These potential park sites (see Map 5, Potential Water Resource Access Sites)
include the following:
Site 1— Black River at N.C. 210 Bridge (Private)
The land area on the western side of the Black River appears to be high ground. The
eastern side appears to be wet. The land on the southwestern side of the River could
make an excellent site for a County waterfront park for both boating and passive
waterfront recreation. Old brick bridge crossing located at this site.
Site 2 —Long Creek at N.C. 210 Bridge (Private)
The west side of Long Creek near the N.C. 210 bridge appears to be wet land. The
east side of Long Creek at the bridge is high. Ara has potential for small park with
boat access to Long Creek.
Site 3 —Rock Fish Creek at S.R.1309 Bridge (Private)
Rock Fish Creek at this point is a wide body of water. Land areas adjacent to creek are
high ground. Old brick railroad crossing located along this portion of creek. Good site
for small boat or canoe access with small park. Pedestrian bridge on portion of old
railroad crossing.
This site was also identified in the rail -to -trail design study conducted in 1994 by the
Department of Landscape Architecture at North Carolina State University.
Site 4 —Holly Shelter Creek at S.R.1520 Bridge (Private)
' Beautiful high ground that is heavily wooded along Holly Shelter Creek. Access to site
is by way of S.R. 1520 which is a dirt road. Excellent location for nature trail or
possibly a State park.
Site 5 —Holly Shelter Creek at S.R.1520 Bridge (Private)
1
1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan 19

As is site 4 above, beautiful high ground that is heavily wooded along Holly Shelter
Creek. Access to site is by way of S.R. 1520 which is a dirt road. Excellent location
for nature trail or possibly a State park.
Site 6 —Northeast Cave Fear River at N.C. 53 Bridge (Private)
There is an existing driveway from N.C. 53 to the east side of the River. There is also
access to the north side of N.C. 53 under the N.C. 53 bridge. This area has potential
for a public boat access and passive waterfront park. Due to heavy automobile traffic
on N.C. 53, modification to land area adjacent to bridge would be necessary to improve
vehicular access and to improve safety.
Wide paved section of road right-of-way that is traditional location for launching small
boats. Lot contains two septic tanks and approximately 50,000 square feet of land.
Site 8 —Potential Regional Park Site (Private)
' This site, located between S.R. 1561 and Virginia Creek consists of a large open field
with wooded fringe along Virginia Creek. Excellent potential for boat access as well as
passive waterfront park area.
' Site 9 —Oven Field on S.R. 1563 (Private)
The open field has access to the Intracoastal Waterway with potential for a regional
waterfront park that could serve the eastern portion of Pender County.
The 100-year flood area is another physical factor that must be taken into account
when considering potential recreation sites. Park facilities such as boat launch, nature
or jogging trails, natural areas and potential non -sheltered picnic areas may be
'
appropriate uses in the 100-year flood zone. The 100-year flood area and some
adjacent uplands could make a very attractive greenway system; however, the County
'
would need to acquire, lease or establish easements to utilize this area for passive open
space or to preserve natural vegetation located along water bodies subject to flooding.
HUD Disaster Recovery funds of $150,000 have recently been allocated to Pender
County for acquisition of floodplain land for conversion to waterfront access. (See
t
Map 6, 100-Year Flood Area Map.)
1
1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan 20

I' 4c

1
I]
V. INVENTORY OF EXISTING FACILITIES/EXISTING PROGRAMS
AND STAFF
A. Existing Pender Countl Parks
During the early planning stages, the Parks Director and Consultant visited each of the
existing park sites used by Pender County Parks and Recreation including County
school sites. The specific locations are shown on the Existing Parks and Schools Map,
Map 1. Individual park site schematic site plans have also been prepared to show the
specific recreation facilities at each location. (See Appendix for Schematic Site Plans 1
through 14.)
Size:.7 acres
Facilities:
• Two picnic tables
• Lighted basketball court
• Playground equipment
Park Site 2 — Edgecombe Community Center
Size: 3 acres
Facilities:
• Community center
• Ballfield
• Outdoor basketball court
• Picnic Shelter
Future Facilities:
• Playground equipment (ADA accessible)
Park Site 3 —Topsail Ball Club
Size: 4.5 acres
Facilities:
• Baseball field
• Playground equipment
Future Facilities:
• Basketball courts
Park Site 4 —Maple Hill Communi , Center
Size: 3 acre
Facilities:
1
1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan 22

• Community/learning center
• Playground equipment
• Outdoor basketball court
• Baseball field
Future Facilities:
• Multi -purpose field
• Playground equipment (ADA accessible)
• Walking/nature trail
Park Site 5 — Willard Community Center
Size: 8.0 acres
Facilities:
• Community center building
• Playground equipment
• Baseball field
Future Facilities:
• New basketball court
Park Site 6—Watha Community Center
Size:.5 acre
Facilities:
• Community center building
Future Facilities:
• Playground equipment
Park Site 7 — Harrell Park
Size:.5 Acres
Facilities:
• Two tennis courts
• Playground equipment
• Two picnic tables
• Gazebo
Park Site 8 — Pender Memorial Park
Size: 8 acres
Facilities:
• One picnic shelter
• One large lighted ballfield
• Two lighted ballfields
• Two lighted ballfields located on leased property
1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan
23

Park Site 9 — Historic Bttrgaw Depot
Size: 2.5 acres
Facilities:
• Covered stage
Park Site 10—Long Creek Communia Center
Size: 19 acres
Facilities:
• Playground equipment
• Open play areas
• Baseball field
• Basketball court
Future Facilities:
• Walking trail
Park Site 11—Atkinson Municipal Park
Size: 1.2 acres
Facilities:
• Two picnic tables
• Concessions building
• Playground equipment
• Two grills
Future Facilities:
• Playground equipment (ADA accessible)
Park Site 12 — Old Atkinson School Playground and Gymnasium
Size: 7 acres
Facilities:
• Baseball field
• Playground equipment
• Gymnasium
Future Facilities:
• Walking trail
• Playground equipment (ADA accessible)
Park Site 13—Pender Couna District Park
Size: 82 acres
Facilities:
• Undeveloped
Future Facilities:
1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan
24

•
Parking
•
Community building
'
•
Restroom/concession stands
•
Eight tennis courts
•
Four volleyball courts
•
Four basketball courts
•
Four small ballfields
•
Four softball fields (lighted)
'
•
Three football/soccer fields
•
Two youth soccer fields
•
•
Open air pavillion
Maintenance building
•
Walking trail
'
Park
Site 14 — Miller Pond Park
Size: 33 Acres
Facilities:
• Undeveloped
Future Facilities:
'
• ADA restroom
• ADA picnic shelter
• ADA trail
'
• Nature trail
• Pond overlook
• Fishing piers
• Parking areas
'
B. School Sites
The Pender County school system has 11 school sites located throughout the County.
'
Exhibit 5 reflects the type and number of recreation facilities available at each school
and total number of facilities through the entire school system. These recreation
facilities represent a substantial investment by Pender County and all recreation
facilities on school property should be used to offer recreational opportunities after
normal school hours. By utilizing these facilities, the County Parks and Recreation
Department and County taxpayers can save a substantial amount of funds by not having
'
to duplicate recreation facilities. For example, based on national standards Pender
County has a current need for 3.9 soccer fields by the year 2000, with none available.
However, the Pender County school system currently has one soccer field at Pender
High School and a practice soccer field at Rocky Point Elementary School, which
nearly meets the national standards.
1
1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan 25

M
0
0
i
0
0
1
�
VJ
►y
" 1
Z
chi'
y
p.r
c'
a
n
0
0
y
�
a
�•
a.
y
a.
n
o
a.
-,
0
�
o
CD -
CD
o
1. North Topsail Elementary School
N
. Topsail High School
3. Topsail Middle School
. South Topsail Elementary School
r
5. Rocky Point Elementary School
. Burgaw Middle School
r
7. Burgaw Elementary School
8. Pender High School
Malpass Corner Elementary School
10. West Pender Middle School
11. Penderlea Elementary School
u
00
w
L"
w
u,
A
Total
M
H
e•*

m
v'
E
0
o
c
y.y.
MM
^mil
r
00+}
(�
a
td
Cd
a.
c
En
E. Edaccombc Communitv Center
mmm��iee�7. Harrell Park
nmmm �
s1s1s1s1s1AlA�m�e�ei�U

1
Exhibit 7
Park Facility Availability by Type
ExUlina r Sites
&khUL&
mm n'
D'
Conservation
1. Surf City Family Park
.70
2. Edgecombe Community
Center
3.00
3. Topsail Ball Club
4.50
4. Maple Hill Community
Center
3.00
5. Willard Community
Center
8.00
6. Watha Community Center
0.50
7. Harrell Park
.50
8. Pender Memorial Park
8.00
9. Historic Bur aw Depot
2.50
10. Long Creek Community
Center
19.00
11. Atkinson Municipal Park
1.20
12.Old Atkinson School
Playground & Gym.
7.00
13. Pender County District
Park
82.001
14. Miller Pond Park
33.001
15. Moores Creek National
Battlefield
87.00
16. Holly Shelter Game Land
48,795.00
17. Angola Bay Game Land
21,134.002
Total Acreage
57.90
33.00
82.001
87.00
69,929.00
'Undeveloped Community and District Parks
2Portion of Angola Bay in Duplin County
Private Recreation Facilities
There are a few private recreation facilities in the County. Examples include golf
courses, tennis courts, swimming pools, amusement areas, and commercial boat ramps
and marinas. Some of these facilities are open for a fee; others require membership or
residency in a certain development. While these private recreation facilities are
recognized as filling a need in the community, they are not specifically enumerated in
this report. In some cases, i.e. private golf, there is no guarantee that the facilities will
remain in recreation use. In other cases, such as open space set aside in residential
1 1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan 28

J
1
subdivisions, the land area may be too small to be developed as a viable park.
Although there is a possibility of existing private recreation facilities being converted to
public use at various times through partnerships and/or lease agreements, these private
areas are not specifically included in the inventory. The following list does provide an
example of the types of private recreational opportunities available in Pender County.
Camping Camp Kirkwood (Burgaw)
Amusements Amusements of Rochester (Burgaw)
Skate Park (Hampstead)
Rocky Point Shooters World (Rocky Point)
Hunting & -Fishing Genteel Plantation (Atkinson)
Preserves Ashton Farms (Rocky Point)
Boat Rental Canoes & Things (Atkinson @ Black River)
Holly Shelter Camp Ground (Holly Shelter)
Tennis Courts Belvedere (Hampstead)
Olde Point (Hampstead)
Swimming Pools Belvedere (Hampstead)
Olde Point (Hampstead)
Camp Kirkwood (Burgaw)
Marinas Scotts Hill Marina (Scotts Hill)
Hampstead Marina (Hampstead)
Harbour Village Marina (SR 1566, Intracoastal Waterway)
Other Resources Poplar Grove Historic Plantation (Scotts Hill)
Pender County Museum (Burgaw)
26 miles of beach at Topsail Island
D. Existing County Recreation Progra . / tall
In earlier sections of the Plan, we have discussed the fact that Pender County currently
has very limited existing recreational facilities. The larger park sites at Miller Pond and
the Pender County District Park (prison site) are currently undeveloped. Although
facilities are limited at this time, the County has an active Parks and Recreation
program considering limited resources and current funding levels. A variety of
recreational opportunities are available to County citizens through County funding
assistance to a number of community recreation organizations that provide volunteer
manpower to coach and oversee programs. Following is a list of volunteer community
recreation organizations that are an integral part of recreation in Pender County.
1
1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan 29

V1
n
1
1
Dixie Youth Baseball
Topsail Ball Club, Inc.
Pop Warner Football (Cent.)
Pop Warner Football (East)
Pender Youth Basketball (Cent.)
Pender Youth Basketball (East)
Pender Youth Soccer
Maple Hill Recreation
Pike Creek Civic Club
The Youth Civic Club
Willard Outreach
Atkinson Youth Council
Pender County Track Club
Edgecombe Community
Many of these programs are carried out through the Parks and Recreation Community
Partnership Program and community volunteers. The goal of this County program is to
improve recreation opportunities in neighborhoods and communities by forming
recreational partnerships between County government and its citizens. Programs
currently supported by Pender County include:
Bike Safety Rodeo
Youth Instructional Lacrosse
Youth Instructional In -Line Skating
2-Ball Competition (Basketball)
Youth Baseball
Open Gym Program (Summer &
Winter)
NYSCA Coaches Certification
Youth Fishing Tournament
Summer Day Camp
Summer Arts Daze
Youth Golf Clinic
NFL/Gatorade Punt -Pass -Kick
Youth Soccer Clinics/Camps
Adult Volleyball
Youth Tennis Instruction
Youth Football Camp
Youth Basketball Leagues
Canoe Outings (Projected)
Cycling Rides (Projected)
Special Events
Youth Track Program
Tennis Lessons (Jrs. and Adults)
Mr. Pee Wee Tennis Program
Walking Club (Projected)
Field Trips
5K Road Races
The Pender County Parks and Recreation program currently has one full-time staff
person, who is the Parks and Recreation Director. All other staff are seasonal/part-
time help and include four to six gym supervisors, four to six day camp coordinators
and three arts and crafts programmers as needed.
In addition, County Parks and Recreation also contracts for services on an as -needed
basis. Interns are used during fall and spring semesters. As discussed earlier,
volunteers are an importnat part of putting on programs due to very limited County
staff.
VI. PARK FACILITY STANDARDS
To determine future park needs for Pender County, the State Comprehensive Outdoor
Recreation Plan (SCORP) and National Recreation and Park Association Standards
were used. Based on the National Recreation and Park Association Standards, a
"core" system of parklands should include a total of 6.25 to 10.5 acres of developed
1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan 30

11'
I
Ii
open space per 1,000 population. Using State population projections for the years
2000, 2010 and 2020, Pender County will have a need for the following developed
open space during the next 20 years:
Year
Population Pro'ections
Acres (6.25)
Acres (I0.5)
2000
39,694 (39.69)
248.0
416.7
2010
48,251 (48.25)
301.5
506.6
2020
56,553 (56.55)
353.4
593.7
Source: National Recreation and Park Association Standards (NRPA)
The State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan provides recommendations for five
park types which include Neighborhood Park, Community Park, District/Metro Area
Park, Regional Park and Dispersed Use/Conservancy Area. For purposes of this
Recreation and Open Space Plan, we have used Neighborhood Park, Community Park
and District/Metro Area Parks as defined in Exhibit 8 below.
Exhibit 8
Park Classification and Size
based on SCORP Standards
Neighborhood Park:
1/4 to 1/2 mile 2 acres per
Mini -parks serving high
Area for intensive recreational
radius; up to 1,000 popula-
density residential areas;
activities such as field and
4,000 people -- tion.
playgrounds, sports field
court games, playground
a neighborhood.
complexes; combination play
equipment, picnicking and
grounds, sports fields/
wading pools.
passive natural areas. 15+
acres is desirable; 6-8 is
typical.
Community Park:
1 to 3 mile 8 acres per
Large park -school complex;
Area providing a wide array
radius; up to 1,000 popula-
recreation center/pool/sports
of active recreational oppor-
20,000 people - tion.
fields/courts complex. City-
tunities, including center
a community.
wide park. Community
building, fields, hard surface
center/park. 25+ acres is
courts, lighting, parking and
desirable; 10-20 is typical.
picnicking. Natural or land-
scaped areas are provided for
passive recreation. May in-
clude swimming pool. May
be in conjunction with school.
1 1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan 31

k
11
r
District/Metro Area Park:
Area serving one or more sub-
urban or rural communities.
Similar to the community
park, these areas offer inten-
sive recreation activities and
natural environment areas.
15 to 20 mile 10 acres per
radius; several 1,000 popula-
communities or tion.
metropolitan
area, up to 1
hour driving
time.
Intensively developed county
parks, developed public
recreation sites at large
reservoirs, state recreation
areas. 200+ acres is desirable
size; 60-80 acres is typical.
Source: Requirements for each park type: N.C. Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP)
The State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP) standards have been
used to establish facility needs such as number of baseball fields, soccer fields, etc.,
based on population projections for the years 2000, 2010 and 2020, as shown in
Exhibit 9 below.
Exhibit 9
Application of SCORP Standards to Determine
Recreation Needs Based on
2000, 2010 and 2020 Population Projections
Tyne of Facility,
Recreation Needs
�QQQQ �QZQ
Canoeing --
Stream Mileage (.2 per 1,000 pop)
7.9 9.6 11.3
Stream Access (1 per 10 miles)
1 1 1
Hiking Trails -- (A per 1,000 pop)
15.84 19.3 22.62
Interpretive Trails --
(.2 per 1,000 population)
7.9 9.6 11.3
Horseback Riding Trails --
(A per 1,000 population)
15.84 19.3 22.62
Swimming, non -pool --
Regional
Designated Beaches 1 per 50,000
Facility
Archery Range -- (1 per 50,000)
Regional Facility
Baseball/Fields -- (1 per 5,000)
7.9 9.6 11.3
Basketball/Courts -- (1 per 5,000)
7.9 9.6 11.3
Bicycling/Urban Bikeways --
Designated Mileage 1 per 1,000
39.6 48.2 56.5
Football/Fields -- (1 per 20,000)
1.9 2.4 2.8
1 1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan 32

Golf -- 18-Hole Course --
(1 per 25,000 population)
1 1 2
Picnicking/Tables -- (1 per 500)
79 96 113
Playground Activities/Tot Lots --
(1 per 1,000 population)
39.6 48.2 56.5
Soccer/Fields -- (1 per 10,000)
3.9 4.8 5.6
Softball/Fields -- (1 per 5,000)
7.9 9.6 11.3
Swimming/Pools -- (1 per 20,000)
Regional Facility
Tennis/Courts -- (1 per2,000)
19.8 24.1 28.3
Volleyball/Courts -- (1 per 5,000)
7.9 9.6 11.3
1Public Trust Waters (no designated canoe trails) 2Public access at three N.C. Wildlife Resource ramps
Source: 2000, 2010 and 2020 N.C. Office of Management and Budget Population Projections; SCORP Needs Assessment for
County
VII. ASSESSMENT OF NEEDS/LOCAL DEMAND
A. Need for Park Land Based on Standards
Using the National Recreation and Park Association standard of 6.25 to 10.5 acres of
recreation area per 1,000 population, Pender County has a current space deficiency of
from 75.1 to 243.8 acres in the year 2000 to 180.5 to 420.8 acres in 2020 based on
current parks and population projections during this period (see Exhibit 10). This also
is based on the assumption that no additional park land will be added to the 172.9 acres
currently available, of which 115.0 acres or 66.5% is currently undeveloped.
Exhibit 10
Park Land Available vs. Desired
Year
"Acres Available
Desired Ramie
Deficiency Range
1998
172.9
*2000
172.9
248.0/416.7
75.1/243.8
*2010
172.9
301.5/506.6
128.6/333.7
*2020
172.9
353.4/593.7
180.5/420.8
*Assumes no additional purchase of land
"Source: Existing Park Inventory
Note: Desired range of 6.25 to 10.5 acres per 1,000 population based on National
Recreation and Park Association Standards.
1
1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan 33

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Using the State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan standards shown in Exhibit
11, 12 and 13, Pender County needs Neighborhood Parks (using a standard of 2 acres
per 1,000 population with a 1/ to Zia mile radius service area) to serve up to 4,000
people. Community Parks would be based on 8 acres per 1,000 population with a 1 to
3 mile radius service area and serving up to 20,000 people. District/Metro Area Parks
would be based on 10 acres per 1,000 population with a 15 to 20 mile radius and
would serve several communities.
Exhibit 11
Neighborhood Parks
Year
Acreage Available
Acreage Needed Acreage
Qj&cienCy
2000
57.9
79.3
21.4
2010
57.9
96.5
38.6
2020
57.9
113.1
55.2
Note: Acreage deficiency for each year assumes no additional purchase of park land and is based on
current park land acreage available in 1998.
All 12 of the park sites currently being used by Parks and Recreation are Neighborhood
Parks with a 1/ to 16 mile service radius.
Exhibit 12
Community Parks
Year
Acreage Available
Acreage Needed Acreage
Dgf ciency
2000
33.0
317.6
284.6
2010
33.0
386.0
353.0
2020
33.0
452.4
419.4
Note: Acreage deficiency for each year assumes no additional purchase of park land and is based on
current park land acreage available in 1998.
Miller Pond, which is currently undeveloped, will be the only Community Park in
Pender County following its development.
Exhibit 13
District Parks
Year
Acreage Available
Acreage Needed
Acreage D , ciency
2000
82.0
317.6
235.6
2010
82.0
386.0
304.0
2020
82.0
452.4
370.4
1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan
34

n
1
Note: Acreage deficiency for each year assumes no additional purchase of park land and is based on
1
current park land acreage available in 1998.
The Pender County District Park proposed to be developed northwest of Burgaw
contains 82.0 acres and, when developed, will have a service radius of 15 to 20 miles.
The planned N.C. 53 Bypass (see Map 4) may impact this site and reduce acreage
available for recreational use.
1
Because the County covers a large geographic area, it is recommended that the County
concentrate on acquisition of additional District Parks rather than development of new
1
Neighborhood and Community Parks. Specific recommendations follow in Section
VE I, Future Site Locations, of this report.
r�
Exhibit 14
Park Facilities/School Facilities
Current Proposed
Parks Pr
Hiking trails
0 1
Baseball fields
9 0
Basketball courts
6 4
Picnic tables/shelters
5 1
Playground
9 0
Soccer fields
0 2
Softball fields
2 8
Tennis courts
2 8
Volleyball court
0 4
Football fields
0 3
Gym
2 0
Multi -purpose room
1 0
Community building
4 1
Schools Total
0
4
4
0
5
3
5
0
0
2
4
0
1
13
14
6
14
5
15
10
4
5
10
5
Exhibit 14 reflects the type and quantity of recreation facilities currently available on
existing park sites, planned County park sites or existing school facilities. This data has
been used to determine facility needs during the 2000 to 2020 planning period using
SCORP standards.
Exhibit 15 reflects current and projected facility deficience for 2000, 2010 and 2020
based on current facilities available. Exhibit 16 reflects projected facility deficiency
following development of Miller Pond and the Pender County District Park planned
northwest of Burgaw. Exhibit 17 reflects facility deficiency using SCORP standards if
park facilities and school facilities are considered. For example, with current park
facilities there is a need for two to five basketball courts between the year 2000 and
1 1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan 35

11
I
11
2020. When proposed basketball courts at Pender County District Park are
constructed, the deficiency drops to 0 to 1.3 in the year 2020.
Exhibit 15
Recreation Needs Based on
2000, 2010 and 2020 Population Projections
Existing Parks
Type of Facility
Recreation Needs
ZQQQ �Q14 t Q [a st
ne>Parks;::::; 2000 Deficiency
2010 Deficiency
2020 Defici
Canoeing -
">>>>>>>
Stream Mileage (.2 per 1,000 pop)
7.9 9.6 11.3
<><< >< 0 miles
0 miles
0 miles
Stream Access (1 per 10 miles)
1 1 1
0
0
0
Hiking Trails -- (.4 per 1,000 pop)
15.84 19.3 22.62 tk
15.84 miles
19.3 miles
22.62 miles
Interpretive Trails --
2 per 1000 population)
rion
( P PoP )
7.9 9.6 11.3 ( =` .... ...................
» 7.9 miles
9 6 mil es
11.3 miles
Horseback Riding Trails --
4 per1,000 population)15.84
19.3 22.62
15.84 miles
19.3 miles
27.62 miles
Swimming, non -pool --
Regional
Designated Beaches 1 per 50 000
g P
Facility Q>>
ty
> Regional
g
Facility
tY
Needed
Archery Range - (1 per 50,000)
Regional Facility
. Regional
Facility
Needed
Baseb ields -- 1 r 5 000
all/F ( pe )
7.9 9.6 11.3'>`<>'>`>'»'
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
0
.6
2.3
Basketball/Courts -- (1 per 5,000)
7.9 9.6 11.3 "' " < <.`:
"<':. `:.< 1.9
3.6
5.3
Bicycling/Urban Bikewa s -
Y
Designated Mileage 1 r 1,000
g g per
39.6 48.2 56.5 '»0<':':
''>':> `:` 39.6 miles
48.2 miles
56.5 miles
Football/Fields--( 1 er 20 000
P )
1. 2.
9 4 2.8 ......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
'
2.4
2.8
Golf -- 18-Hole Course --
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
(1 per 25,000 population)
1 1 2 Q;;<;;»>r>»;>;
1
1
2
Picnic ' kin ables - 1 r 500
g� per )
(
9 9 13 a5 » f>
7 6 1
> > < ' ................... 70
91
108
Playground Activities -
1 per 1 ,000 population)
( P PoP )
39.6 48.2 56.5 ><>`<<«=<>
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
30.6
39.2
47.5
Soccer/Fields -- (1 per 10,000)
......................................
3.9 4.8 5.6 (#
%
3.9
4.8
5.6
Softball/Fields-- 1 per 5,000)
)
7.9 9.6 11.3 ......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
Swimming/Pools -- (1 per 20,000)
Regional Facility ft `.............................
1.98
2.4
2.8
Tennis Courts --
/ 1 r 2 000
( Pe )
1 .8 24.1 28.
9 3» »`>>>>>»<>>
....................................
......................................
17.8
22.1
26.3
Volleyball/Courts -- (1 per 5,000)
7.9 9.6 11.3
..I.
7.9
9.6
11.3
1Public Trust Waters (no designated
canoe trails) 2Public access at three N.C. Wildlife Resource ramps
Source: 2000, 2010 and 2020 N.C. Office of Management and Budget Population Projections; SCORP Needs Assessment
for Pender
County
1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan 36

fl
CI'
k
Exhibit 16
Recreation Needs Based on
2000, 2010 and 2020 Population Projections
Existing ParkslProposed Parks
............................................................................
Tvge of Facility
Recreation Needs _arkl>z
ZQQQ Q ( Q dossed P ifl&
2000 Deficiency
2010 Deficiency
2020 Deficiency
Canoeing --
Stream Mileage (.2 per 1,000 pop)
7.9 9.6 11.3 1? ::::::.:::::......::::;_ «:
0 miles
0 miles
0 miles
Stream Access (1 per 10 miles)
1 1 1 3i$psz':?
0
0
0
H' --
ilan Trails 4 per 1000 0
g ( P , pop)
15.84 19.3 22.62 �.>»>»><>>'
��:.-:::
......................................
14.3 miles
17.8 miles
21.1 miles
Interpretive Trails --
2 per 1 000 population)
P PoP )
7.9 9.6 11.3 ..
>4� � <� <>�>>>>...
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
7.4 miles
m
9.1 miles
10.8
Horseback Riding Trails --
......................................
......................................
<`:':.................. :''''''' ">>':
(.4 per 1,000 population)
15.84 19.3 22.62 tkl` `:': ' ' ? < <_ ..
15.84 miles
19.3 miles
27.62 miles
non -pool
Swimming, P�
Regional
g
Designated Beaches 1 per 50,000
Facility 1':'':
Regional
Facility
Needed
Archery --
Ran e 1 per 50 000
g ( P )
Regional Facility
g h'>><�_<;>>>.::.
......................................
......................................
Re 'onal
gi
ili
Facility
tY
Needed
Baseball/Fields -- (1 per 5,000)
7.9 9.6 11.3 9[[[[
0
0
1.3
Bas --
ketb Courts 1 er 5 000 a1U
7.9 9.6 11.3
Bic clip rban Bikeways
a s --
Desig
nated Mileage 1 r 1000 g
g per
39.6 48.2 56.5 ><[»<`.`>>>':<>'.
39.6 miles
48.2 miles
56.5 miles
Football/Fields -- 1 r 20 ( ,000)
Pe
1.9 2.4 2.8>> >``<>
0
0
0
Golf -- 18- Hole Course -
( 1 per 25 000 population)
P P P )
1 1 2 .......
1
1
2
Picnicking/Tables-- 1 per 500
79 96 11......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
Playground Activities --
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
%
(1 per 1,000population)
39.6 48.2 56.5 9>'i'.><:?':':
30.6
39.2
47.5
Soccer/Fields-- 1 per 10,000)
3.9 4.8 5.6.:....................................
Softball/Fields -- (1 per 5,000)
7.9 9.6 11.3 ......4':
0
0
1.3
Swimming/Pools--1 er 20 000
( P )
Regional
Tonal Facili < () ' ....f > »>
g tY
1.98
2.4
2.8
Tennis/Courts -- (1 per 2,000)
19.8 24.1 28.3 [IU
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
9.8
14.1
18.3
Volleyball/Courts -- (1 per 5,000)
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
7.9 9.6 11.3
3.9
5.6
7.3
'Public Trust Waters (no designated canoe trails) 2Public access at three N.C. Wildlife Resource ramps
Source: 2000, 2010 and 2020 N.C. Office of Management and Budget Population Projections; SCORP Needs Assessment for Pender
County
1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan 37

Exhibit 17
' Recreation Needs Based on
2000, 2010 and 2020 Population Projections
Existing ParkslProposed Parks and School Facilities
n
Interpretive Trails --
(.2 per 1,000 population)
7.9 9.6 11.3 <(?':
7.4 miles
9.2 miles
10.8 miles
Horseback Riding Trails --
4 per 1 000 population)
( P )
PoP
15.84 19.3 22.62 U>[»»>[>=>»><
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
.84 es
15 mil
19.3 miles
27.62 miles
Swimming, non -pool -
Regional
Designated Beaches 1 r 50 000
g per
Facility
tY ' <
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
« Regional
< ? ?< <..... g
Facility
n'
Needed
Archery Range -- (1 per 50,000)
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
Regional Facility (k':':
Regional
Facility
Needed
Baseball/Fields-- 1 per 5,000)
7.9 9.6 11.3 ......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
..........................%
......................................
0
0
0
Basketball/Courts -- (1 per 5,000)
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
7.9 9.6 11.3 _4?
......................................
...................................
.........
.. 0
0
0
Bic clipgNrban Bikeways --
Designated Mileage 1 r 10 00
39.6 48.2 56.5
= 39.6 miles
48.2 miles
56.5 miles
Football/Fields -- 1 per 20 000
( p )
1.9 2.4 2.8 5>'I>[<>?
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
>' 0
0
0
Golf -- 18-Hole Course --
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
1 per 25 000 population)
P PoP
1 1 2 ..................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
Picnicking/Tables - (1 per 500)
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
79 96 113........................._
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
.:...........73
90
107
Playground Activities --
..........X..........................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
1 r 1000 population) ( per pop )
39.6 48.2 56.5 ['d>>>':>`>>'.
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
25.6
34.2
42.5
Soccer/Fields -- (1 per 10,000)
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
3.9 4.8 5.6 5[.'>.>?
................:.....................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
0
0
.6
Softball/Fields -- (1 per 5,000)
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
7.9 9.6 11.35':
:...................................:.
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
.':`':.=?` 0
0
0
Swimming/Pools -- (1 per 20,000)
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
Regional Facility (':
1.98
2.4
2.8
Tennis Courts -- 1 000 2 per
/ ( P )
1 .
9 8 24.1 28.3>':>>``>>`>'
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
9.8
14.1
18.3
Volleyball/Courts -- (1 per 5,000)
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
7.9 9.6 11.3 1''[
3.9
5.6
7.3
lPublic Trust Waters (no designated
canoe trails) 2Public access at three N.C. Wildlife Resource ramps
Source: 2000, 2010 and 2020 N.C. Office of Management and Budget Population Projections; SCORP Needs Assessment
for Pender
County
1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan 38

In summary, following development of Miller Pond and the Pender County District
Park west of Burgaw, the park system will have the following deficiency for years 2000
' and 2020, which can be sited on future District Park sites or existing Neighborhood
Parks.
'
Exhibit 18
Future Park Facility Needs
Summary
'
Available
'
Hiking trails 1.5 miles 14.3 miles
17.8 miles
Interpretive trails .5 miles 7.4 miles
10.8 miles
'
Picnicing/ Tables 6 73
Playground Activities 9 30.6
107
47.5
Swimming Pool 0 1.98
2.8
Tennis Courts 10 9.8
18.3
'
Volleyball 4 3.9
7.3
Soccer Fields 2 1.9
3.6
Baseball 9 0
1.3
'
Basketball 10 0
1.3
'
B. Community Input on Park and Recreation Priorities
During the early planning process the Parks and Recreation Director and the
'
Consultant held a series of public meetings throughout the
County to obtain
information from citizens on recreation needs and desires.
E
The first meeting was held in Burgaw on December 15, 1997, with approximately 18
citizens in attendance. The following needs were expressed:
• Tennis courts
• Walling space/greenways
• Soccer fields
• Youth sports fields (all sports)
• Community center
• Park staffing (volunteers burning out)
• Boat access (Moore's Creek, Intracoastal Waterway and Lane's Ferry)
Subsequent meetings and infomation gained include the following:
Hampstead on January 8, 1998:
• Soccer complex
• Tennis courts
1
1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan 39

• Public pool
• Community center (staffed)
• Playground park
• Staffing for Parks and Recreation
• Open spaces
• Canoe trail
• Purchase land, including waterfront
• Improve existing facilities
• Better utilization of existing facilities
Malpass Corner/Atkinson on January 13, 1998:
• Walking trail
• Playground equipment
• Renovation of park
• Renovation of gym
• Renovation of ballfield
• Programs
Penderlea on January 15, 1998:
• Renovation of ballfield
• Walking trail/track
• Programs
• Recreation center
Rocky Point on January 21, 1998:
• Walking trail
• Programs
• Multi -purpose field
Maple Hill on January 28, 1998:
• Picnic shelter
• Public pool with bath house
• Ballfield/bleachers/dugouts
• Gym
• Tennis courts
• Parking
• Playground with ADA considerations
• Nature trail
• Outdoor concession area with restrooms
• Community garden
• Track/walking trail
1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan
40

11
• Multi -purpose use of ballfield
Currie
• Soccer field
• Softball
• Heavy duty basketball goals and rims for older boys
• Trash containers
A review of all public meetings reflects an interest in walking trail/greenways. Three
community areas expressed interest in more tennis courts and three expressed interest
in soccer fields.
Although only mentioned at one public meeting, the need for improved public access to
the water was established as part of the 1993 Waterfront Access Plan. This need, as
well as other needs expressed at the public meetings, has been incorporated into the
Action Plan, Section IX, of this Plan.
VIII. FUTURE SITE LOCATIONS
The County currently has 12 Neighborhood Park sites available throughout the County, with
one Community Park planned and one District Park planned west of Burgaw. In developing
future park facilities, the County has the option of purchasing future sites for Neighborhood,
Community and District Parks or concentrate future recreation facilities in District Parks that
serve a larger geographic area. Future District Parks of 60 to 80 acres in size would require
less staff for maintenance and programming than having numerous Neighborhood and
Community Parks throughout the County, each with a smaller service area.
To determine the best location for future District Parks, we have looked at current and future
population, land use and concentrations of residential areas, topography and soils, highways,
other physical barriers and relation to 100-year flood zone and potential rail -trails.
Topsail Township, with a 1990 population of 8,403, was the fastest growing area of the
County from 1980 to 1990. Rocky Point, with a 1990 population of 3,377, was the second
fastest growing township in the County. Both Topsail Township and Rocky Point are located
adjacent to major thoroughfares, specifically I-40 and U.S. 17, making these areas easily
accessible from other points in the County. Both of these townships have large land areas that
are located outside the 100-year flood area with soil types that are suitable for recreational use.
Both of these townships contain a growing residential population which will most likely
continue during the five- to 20-year planning period due to access and location in relation to
Wilmington and I-40. To better serve the future recreational needs of western Pender County,
a District Park should be located in this area of the County.
With an 82-acre undeveloped Pender County District Park located in Burgaw Township,
which is the third most populated township in the County based on 1990 Census, it would
1
1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan 41

appear reasonable to locate future District Parks of 60 to 80 acres each in Topsail, Rocky
Point and Grandy Townships (see Map 7, Proposed and Undeveloped Parks). The specific
' locations have not been made as part of this Plan; however, when the County is ready to
proceed with site selection the factors discussed in the Plan should be considered. Efforts
should be made to place the Rocky Point park site adjacent to the abandoned CSX railroad
' right-of-way in the event this corridor is used as a rail -trail. Availability and price will be two
additional factors to be considered. As the County continues to grow in population, the
County may want to consider including a 60 to 80 acre District Park as part of future school
' location plans.
In addition to District Parks, County citizens have a great deal of interest in having improved
twater access. The 1993 Waterfront Access Plan identified a number of waterfront sites with
potential for boat access and passive recreation on the waterfront. Nine potential sites from
' the 1993 Plan have been included for consideration. All of these sites are privately owned and
would require purchase, lease or easement to utilize for public waterfront access. (See Map 5,
Potential Water Resource Access.)
' During the public participation process citizens in four communities expressed the desire to
have more walking trails. The Plan has included future walking trails at Maple Hill Community
' Center, Long Creek Community Center, Old Atkinson School, Miller Pond and the Pender
County District Park.
' The 1993 Waterfront Access Plan identified the potential for a rail -trail along the old CSX
railroad right-of-way. If developed, this rail -trail would provide a 26-mile long walking -
jogging trail centrally located in Pender County. Once developed, this trail could not only
' meet recreational needs but could also have economic benefits by bringing people into the
County to enjoy what would be a unique recreational opportunity. With ease of access to the
trail by way of I-40, communities such as Willard, Watha, Burgaw and Rocky Point could
' benefit economically by promoting the trail's use. The County Parks and Recreation Director
and County officials should continue to pursue using this old railroad corridor as a rail -trail
facility. (See Map 8, Potential 26-Mile Rail -Trail.)
' IX. ACTION PLAN TO MEET UNMET NEEDS
' Through use of national and State standards, site visits and community input, the previous
sections outlined deficiencies in the Pender County Parks and Recreation Department
' resources. These needs can best be met through long-range planning and careful allocation of
resources through the next one to 20 years and beyond. Needs can be broken down into four
areas: facility development, land acquisition, staffing and operating budget.
' A. Facility Development
' 1. Short Term Q — 5 Years),
F
1 1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan 42

11
i
1
L
H
I
I �'
1
Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan
Map # 7
Proposed & Undeveloped Parks
Pender County Recreation & Open Space Plan
Pender County, North Carolina
Legend
General Location of
Future District Park (60-80 acre each)
�---;- — Potential Rail —Trail (26 miles)
Undeveloped 82 Acre (District Park)
® Undeveloped Miller Pond (Community Park)
Note: 5 to T Additional Neighborhood Parks
(15 acres each) Needed Close to Existing
Cluster of Residential Development
jy 0 1 1* 2 w1w 4 m1.. $ 114.
Howard T. Capps & Associates, Inc.
U" ram.hW L-&-r. m.ee."—
em x-th fn.t et,.4 ftiu me
vumkwom
CC 04m
S

Map # 8
Potential 26 mile Rail —Trail
Pender County Recreation & Open Space Plan
Pender County, North Carolina
AING7ON-1'
��M/iyOT�Ny
-c- TO WAR:
1O
Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan

L�
The County is currently working to upgrade existing park facilities with new
ballfields, backstops, playground equipment, picnic tables, benches and trash
receptacles. It is recommended that the County continue to concentrate on
upgrading existing park facilities during the short term (1— 5 year period) based
' on future improvements listed on each schematic site plan.(schematic plan 1-
12 in Appendix)
Also during this period, it is recommended that the County begin development
of facilities at Miller Pond Park with completion within the short term period.
' Park Site 13 — Miller Pond Park
Site preparation (clearing, grading and erosion control)$5,000.00
Gravel parking area (19 cars) and entrance drive 11,700.00
Two paved handicapped parking spaces
950.00
Landscaping for parking area islands
3,000.00
Restroom facilities/septic system/well
34,300.00
Picnic shelter (handicapped access)
18,000.00
Nature trail/ADA trail/bridges
16,515.00
Two 30' long fishing piers
7,200.00
Overlook (handicapped access)
1,330.00
Boat tie-up fishing pier
1,330.00
Picnic tables
4,900.00
Trash receptacles
1,800.00
Entrance sign/PARTF sign/trail signs
2,000.00
Sub -total
108,625.00
Contingency/design fee
16,831.00
Total Estimated Cost $125,456.00
The Master Plan for the Pender County District Park should be revised as soon
as possible after final location of Burgaw Bypass (N.C. 53) is determined.
Based on revised site plan, it is recommended that the County begin
development of the Pender County District Park in phases.
Park Site 3 —District Park
6" waterline (3,600 LF) incl. fire hydrants $108,000.00
Vehicle access road/parking for 450 cars 300,000.00
Community building (47,000 SF) 3,525,000.00
Remote restrooms/concession stands (2 @ 800 SF) 136,000.00
Remote restrooms (playground) (400 SF) 34,000.00
Eight tennis courts 80,000.00
Four volleyball courts 17,000.00
1
1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan 45

Four basketball courts 40,000.00
Four small ballfields 360,000.00
'
Four softball fields with lights
920,000.00
Three soccer/football fields
270,000.00
Two youth soccer fields
140,000.00
'
Open air pavillion (200' x 100')
800,000.00
Maintenance building (30' x 50')
52,500.00
Walking trail (6,500' x 8' wide, gravel)
162,500.00
'
Landscaping (100 canopy, 100 ornamental,
150 screen plants)
45,000.00
Total Estimated Cost*
$6,990,000.00
' *Source: The Wooten Company (subject to revision based on revised site plan)
2. Mid -Term (5 —10 Years)
It is recommended that the County continue development of the Pender County
District Park, with completion by the end of this mid-term period. Replacement
' and upgrading of existing facilities on an on -going basis as needed is also
recommended.
' 3. Long Term (10 — 20 Years)
As new park sites are added, the County will need to continue to budget for
future recreation facilities.
Proposed facility improvements for existing Neighborhood Parks, Miller Pond Park and
' Pender County District Park exceeds $7,100,000 as of 1998. Funding for Parks and
Recreation capital improvements has continued to increase annually since 1995, and is
now at $100,000 for 1998-99. It is recommended that funding for Parks and
' Recreation capital improvements be increased beginning with the 1999-2000 budget to
$250,000 annually. At this funding level, the County could leverage local funds with
' Parks and Recreation Trust Fund (PARTF) grant funds ($250,000 maximum) to
expedite facility development. If grant funds are not received, increased local funds
would help expedite facility development.
' B. Land Acquisition
It is recommended that the County establish a capital fund of $250,000 per year for
park land acquisition beginning with the 2001-2002 budget year. These funds could be
used as matching funds for PARTF grant funds ($250,000 maximum).
' The County should begin the process of identifying future District Park sites and
waterfront access sites and then purchase as financially feasible, or apply for State and
1
1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan 46

1
federal grant funds to help in the purchase of future park sites. A local bond issue
could also be considered for purchase of park land, or County officials could
recommend that the Pender County School Board include adequate acreage for District
Park land as part of any future school site acquisition.
C. f
As discussed in earlier sections, Pender County Parks and Recreation staff currently
' consists of one full-time director with part-time or contract workers on an as -needed
basis. A significant number of community volunteers also make many recreation
programs possible.
Staff needs -will increase as the proposed Pender County District Park is developed;
' specifically a District Coordinator at the District Park, one Program Specialist and one
Athletic Program Specialist will be needed. As future parks are added, additional
District Coordinators will be needed for each site. As the park system grows,
additional contract help and volunteers will also be needed.
D. Operating Budget
' The operating budget for Parks and Recreation will continue to increase as personnel
are added and the need for more maintenance and supplies increases. Future operating
budgets should include increases as the number of parks and people served increases.
X. FUNDING SOURCES
' A. Funding Alternatives
' Funding for parks and recreation generally comes from the following sources:
a) General Fund - The majority of the annual budget for parks and recreation comes
' from the general fund of Pender County, which is collected annually in the form of
property taxes. The general fund pays primarily for the operating budget -- personnel,
maintenance, utilities, etc. -- but may also be used to pay for acquisition and
' development.
b) Federal and State Grants - The County is eligible for grants from time to time to
pay for specific acquisition and development projects. Three examples are Land and
Water Conservation Fund (LWCF), Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA) grants,
and Parks and Recreation Trust Fund (PARTF) which has an annual maximum of
$250,000 for acquisition or facility development. Federal and State grants generally
require matching funds from the local government.
1
1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan 47

C
L
c) Park Facility Fee - Subdivision Regulations can require all land subdividers to pay a
fee to be used for purchase and development of public park facilities for use of future
residents.
d) Donations - Land donations are occasionally made for miniparks or open space.
It is obvious that no one source of funds for parks and recreation will suffice. Revenue
sources other than those listed above may be appropriate for the Parks and Recreation
program. Determination as to the best combination of funding sources rests with local
elected officials, and ultimately with the voting public. In addition to funding sources
listed above, the following financing alternatives may be considered:
e) General Obligation Bonds - Since taxes from the general fund are primarily used
for operation and maintenance, borrowing may be necessary to acquire new land and
develop facilities. The State of North Carolina authorizes county and local
governments to borrow funds for capital facilities through the issuance of bonds,
contingent upon voter approval. By law, local governments may borrow up to 8% of
their assessed property value. The County is empowered to levy a tax to pay the debt
on such bonds.
f) Other Federal and State Assistance - The County should continue to pursue LWCF
and CAMA grants. In addition, other federal and/or State funding sources may be
available in certain cases, assuming such funding remains available. Potential funding
sources include the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's
Community Block Grant (CDBG) Program; the National Foundation of the Arts and
Humanities' Expansion Arts Program; and the General Services Administration
Property Management and Disposal Service, which, in some cases, conveys surplus
federal real estate to local governments. State sources include the North Carolina
Division of Marine Fisheries' Public Fishing Access Grants Program and the North
Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission's Boating Access Program.
It should be noted that with federal funding sources, demand for funding is generally
very high, and resources are limited. Additionally, some programs are being eliminated
or greatly reduced through federal budget cuts.
g) Foundations - Another source of revenue is state and national foundations, which
may fund both facility and program development. The restrictions and limitations of
foundations, as well as types of projects they fund, vary widely. A listing of
appropriate foundations is found in the publication "Grant Seeking in North Carolina,"
available from the North Carolina Center of Public Policy Research, P. O. Box 430,
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27602.
h) Local Gifts Program - While the Parks and Recreation Department occasionally
receives land donations from private sources, a coordinated effort may be more
effective in encouraging donations. It may be beneficial to consider developing an
1
1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan 48

organized gifts program to encourage the donation of land, money, materials and labor.
Such gifts can be used to provide all or a portion of the local matching requirements for
' federal and State grants, or they may be coupled with existing Parks and Recreation
Department resources.
' A well organized gifts program could use one or more approaches to encourage
donations. Such a program could be instrumental, for example, in educating the public
about the tax benefits of land donation. Types of land gifts may include the donation of
' fee simple ownership, a life estate, an easement, and below market sale. A brochure or
fact sheet could be prepared to explain the tax benefits of various land gifts.
Some communities have developed a "gifts catalog" as a tool for encouraging
donations of all types. A publication of this type should explain the role of the gifts
program, the advantages to the Parks and Recreation Department, the tax advantage to
the donor, the various gifts needed (i.e. land, labor, trees, playground apparatus,
maintenance equipment, picnic tables, etc.), and their costs, if any.
' Regardless of the approach used, a strategy for contacting potential donors
(individuals, businesses, developers, civic clubs, charitable institutions, etc.) should be
' developed. This strategy may include periodic distribution of brochures, presentations
to civic clubs, and media coverage. Another important vehicle for educating potential
donors is through local attorneys, trust departments of lending institutions, and others
who may counsel individuals in estate planning.
0
1
1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan 49

APPENDIX
1
1998 Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan 50

SIZE: J ACRES
FACILITIES: — 2 PICNIC TABLES
— LIGHTED BASKETBALL COURT
— PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT
MARSH
SOUTH TOPSAIL DRIVE
Site # 1
Surf City Family
Park
(SCHEMATIC)
® 0 — 8
� E 1
SCALE: 1't=40'
Howard T. Capps do Associates, Inc.
VAS Pleming Lneacepe ArcNi—e-
201 NOAh hoot Street. Suib 402
Milmiryllon. N—h C-1— 28401
)810) 763-7106
Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan

PICNIC
SHELTER
COMMUNITY CENTER
<O OCOM
SIZE: 3 ACRES
FACILITIES: — COMMUNITY CENTER
— BALLFIELD
— OUTDOOR BASKETBALL COURT
— PICNIC SHELTER
�:1_14421210li
]BUILDING
STORAGE
FUTURE
'IES:
— PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT
(ADA ACCESSIBLE)
FUTURE PLAYGROUND
�— EQUIPMENT
PERKINS ROAD US 17>
Site # 2
Edgecombe Community
Center
(SCHEMATIC)
® 0 100 zoo
SCALE: 1"=100'
Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan
Howard T. Capps & Associates. Inc.
(and Plann,n, Lndr ps M hdact-
201 North Fnnt S— L 61iW �2
Nilming[on. North C...1 s 28401
(810) 760-4 08

OPEN FIELD
GRAVEL
PARKING
HWY US 17
SIZE: 4.5 ACRES
FACILITIES: — BASEBALL FIELD
— PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT
FUTURE
FACILITIES: — BASKETBALL COURTS
EXISTING
WOODED
AREA
PLAYGROUND
ASPHALT PAD
(BASKETBALL COURT)
Site # 3
CAPE FEAR
COMMUNITY
COLLEGE
HAMPSTEAD
CAMPUS
Topsail Ball Club
Hampstead
(SCHEMATIC)
® 0 100 200
SCALE: 1"=100t
Howard T. Capps & Associates, Inc.
L—d Pl-..I L—d— A-hit..6
Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan 201 North Front St—t. Suite 402
Yilmi"gtoo. north C.-h— 28401
[phone]

FUTURE
MULTI —PURPOSE
FIELD
SIZE: 3 ACRES
FACILITIES: — COMMUNITY / LEARNING CENTER
— PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT
— OUTDOOR BASKETBALL COURT
— BASEBALL FIELD
FUTURE
FACILITIES: — MULTI —PURPOSE FIELD
— PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT (ADA ACCESSIBLE)
— WALKING / NATURE TRAIL
— PICNIC TABLES
NATURE/
WALKING TRAIL
OLD PLAYGROUND
i
PLAYGROUNI?
r0__8 R_ EQUIPMENT
Site # 4
Maple Hill Community
Center
(SCHEMATIC)
® o goo zoo
SCALE: 1"=100'
Fender County Recreation and Open Space Plan
Howard T. Capps & Associates, Inc.
(end P/an,n. Land­N M—t-
20t North F t St -L Suites W2
�Ilminyton North C.-h— 28"t
[phone]

PLAYGROUND -
EQUIPMENT
SIZE: 8.0 ACRES
FACILITIES: — COMMUNITY CENTER
— PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT
— BASKETBALL COURT
FUTURE
FACILITIES: — BASEBALL FIELD
— PICHC TABLES
STORAGE
/BUILDING
PLAYGROUND AREA
(NO EQUIPMENT)
HWY 11
0
FUTURE BALLFIELD
BASKETBALL COURT
I
I
t
I
I
.REA
I
I
I
/
/
.J
Site # 5
Willard Community
Center
(SCHEMATIC)
it
0 100 200
SCALE: 1"=100'
Pender Count Recreation and Open Space Plan Howard nd Capps iu Associates, Inc.
Y I� P c.na vunn;n` rnan.Pe e.zn«w.x
201 Norm front sleet. slue 1 a
Milmmgw. No'1 C-1— 281 1
(.0) 763-770e

H
SIZE: .5 ACRES
FACILITIES: - COMMUNITY CENTER
FUTURE
FACILITIES: - PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT
- BENCHES
- TRASH RECEPTICLES
- PICNIC TABLES
OPEN
FIELD
---------------------------
FUTURE
PLAYGROUND I
EQUIPMENT
I
I I
I I
I I
OPEN I I
FIELD I I
I
I z
I Y Z I
j a rj d I
I I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
WATHA ROAD
OLD RAILROAD R/W
I
Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan
HOUSE
Site # 6
Watha Community
Center
(SCHEMATIC)
® o ioo zoo
SCALE: 1"=100'
Howard T. Capps a Associates, Inc.
Land Pl--., Lnd—ps Amh,b.I-
201 W,M F—L S—. $,,U 402
Wluag— Norte C—l— 28401
fetal yea-noe

TENNIS
PARKING
ASHE STREET
SIZE: 0.5 ACRES
FACILITIES: — 2 TENNIS COURTS
— PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT
— 2 PICNIC TABLES
— GAZEBO
PLAYGROUND
EQUIPMENT
PICNIC TABLES
0,
PLAYGROUND
EQUIPMENT
Site # 7
Harrell Park
(SCHEMATIC)
® 0 50 100
mmmmmmi
SCALE: 1"=50'
Howard T. Capps & Associates, Inc.
t1od PU11111 l ,od epe e. hlt-t-
20l North Front Street solve 402
Miming o¢ North Cer 1— 28401
Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan

LIGHTED
BALLFIELDS
LARGE
LI GH TED
BALLFIELD
HELICOPTER
PAD -�
SMITH STREET
Uj
w
w
ry
a
J
U
SIZE: B ACRES
FACILITIES: - I PICNIC SHELTER
- 1 LARGE LIGHTED BALLFIELD
- 2 LIGHTED BALLFIELDS
- 2 LIGHTED BALLFIELDS LOCATED
ON LEASED PROPERTY
NOTE: TWO BALLFIELDS ARE LOCATED
ON LAND LEASED BY BURGAW DIXIE
YOUTH AND ARE NOT PART OF
PARK SITE
PRIVATE YARD
SMALL LIGHTED
BALLFIELDS
BURGAW -�
Site # 8
Pender Memorial Park
(SCHEMATIC)
® 0 200 400
SCALE: 1"=200'
Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan
Howard T. Capps & Associates. Inc.
4aQ Plennm9 LOJenpe Ar.^n<4eCuro
201 Nunn prom street lulu !0
Klmin(bn. North a 28l01
(810) '169--08-TI08

W. WILMINGTON STREET
AIN
:POT
TRAIN
/CAR
FREMONT STREET
F—
w
w
F—
V)
z
0
V)
W-
W
Y
U
Cat
SIZE: 2.5 ACRES
FACILITIES: — COVERED STAGE
Site # 9
Historic Burgaw Depot
(SCHEMATIC)
® 0 60 120
SCALE: 1"=6Or
Howard T. Capps & Associates. Inc.
201 North Fm,t Street, 3WU 402
rllminaWn. North C—i— 28401
(Bto) 760-7708
Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan

SIZE: 19 ACRES
FACILITIES: — PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT
— OPEN PLAY AREAS
— BASEBALL FIELD
— BASKETBALL COURT
— GYM
— MULTI —PURPOSE BUILDING
FUTURE
FACILITIES: — WALKING TRAIL
',��" ,'7,�'f�+�+J��l�%i�l hfr�tKi'�:;,:" 'tom_' �'!`. '�"'�'•�'"''' .�',�.'',�'��'�
MULTI—PURVOSE
r,• BUILDING �� BALLFIELD
El
BASKETBALL 1
-'
COURT '
1
1
PARKING OPEN FIELD
------
US HWY 210
Site # 10
Long Creek Community
Center
(SCHEMATIC)
® 0 200 400
SCALE: 1"=200'
Howard T. Capps & Associates, Inc
UM P/ennfn, (eaC P. Arsaifacturo
201 North Fro Street Sulte 402
rlminyton. North C.-o n9 l
Pender County Recreation and Open Space plan (sio) 763-77oa

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
SIZE: 1.2 ACRES
FACILITIES: — 2 PICNIC TABLES
— CONCESSIONS BUILDING
— PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT
— 2 GRILLS
FUTURE
FACILITIES: — PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT
(ADA ACCESSIBLE)
TIMBER EDGE PLAYGROUND
® EQUIPMENT
PICNIC TABLES
Ir GRILL
PARKING
FENCE
BETTY'S BRIDGE ROAD
\GRILL
Site # 11
Atkinson Municipal Park
(SCHEMATIC)
® 0 40 SO
SCALE: 1°=40'
Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan
Howard T. Capps & Associates. Inc.
LnI iLnnu�( LiNxrope ArcA!lentuie
201 North Front St—t Suite 402
Mi1mWQtonNorth Cet h- 20401
N0) 780-7708

SIZE: 7 ACRES
FACILITIES: - BASEBALL FIELD
- PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT
- GYMNASIUM
- BASKETBALL COURT
WALKING
TRAIL
ASPHALT
PAD
FUTURE
FACILITIES: - WALKING TRAIL
- PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT
(ADA ACCESSIBLE)
----------------------
i
,
,
,
,
,
,
i
BASKETBALL COURT
PLAYGROUND,,
EQUIPMENT
W. HENRY STREET
ATKINSON
YOUTH COUNCIL
,
,
F/Mo/M I
,
,
,
,
,
777%�% / ,
TOWN HALL /
w
w
F-
V)
O
J
w
U-
a
z
of
a_
V)
1W
F-
N
w
0
w
J
J
U
Z
Site # 12
Old Atkinson School
Playground and Gymnasium
(SCHEMATIC)
' 0 100 200
®
SCALE: 1 100,
Howard T. Capps & Associates. Inc.
Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan 2°1 "°"' Fro°` sum` g"`" 1°2
Milmingw( N.rlh C... — 28C 1
Bh
10) '180-'! W

SIZE: 82 ACRES
FACILITIES: — UNDEVELOPED
FUTURE
FACILITIES: — PARKING
— COMMUNITY BUILDING
— RESTOOM/CONCESSION STANDS
— 8 TENNIS COURTS
— 4 VOLLEYBALL COURTS
— 4 BASKETBALL COURTS
— 4 SMALL BALLFIELDS
— 4 SOFTBALL FIELDS (LIGHTED)
— 3 FOOTBALL/SOCCER FIELDS
— 2 YOUTH SOCCER FIELDS
— OPEN AIR PAVILLION
— MAINTENANCE BUILDING
— WALKING TRAIL
Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan
SITE PLAN BY:
THE WOOTEN COMPANY
Site # 13
Pender County District
Park
(SCHEMATIC)
Howard T. Capps & Associates, Inc.
(and Plan—( L—d—p. Ar M—t-
201 North front 8lreet. 3w[e 402
MilmioQbn. Borth Caroline 28401
[phone]

RESTROOMS
PARKIN
SIZE: 33 ACRES
FACILITIES: — UNDEVELOPED
FUTURE
FACILITIES: — ADA RESTROOM
— ADA PICNIC SHELTER
— ADA TRAIL
— NATURE TRAIL
— POND OVERLOOK
— FISHING PIERS
— PARKING AREAS
�t
NATURE TRAIL -------
Site # 14
Miller Pond Park
(SCHEMATIC)
® 0 300 600
SCALE: 1"=300'
Pender County Recreation and Open Space Plan
Howard T. Capps & Associates, Inc.
Lind Pf— .n A-hiL ot-
201 Not F_.t Stt L SWW 402
Ydmiwrnn, K.C-1[— 20/0L
810) 783-770S