1997 Land Use Plan-2000

1
ONSLOW COUNTY,
1 NORTH CAROLINA
1 1 1997 LAND USE PLAN
I
Adopted by the Onslow County Board of Commissioners: February 11, 2000
Certified by the Coastal Resources Commission: March 24, 2000
Prepared By:
Holland Consulting Planners, Inc.
Wilmington, North Carolina
The preparation of this document was financed in part through a grant provided by the
North Carolina Coastal Management Program, through funds provided by the Coastal
Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, which is administered by the Office of
Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration.

ITABLE OF CONTENTS
ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
1997 LAND USE PLAN UPDATE
IPAGE
SECTION I: ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
A.
INTRODUCTION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF INFORMATION BASE ...........
1-1
B.
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ...........................................
1-6
C.
1.
DEMOGRAPHICS AND HOUSING ......................................
Onslow County Permanent Population ...................................
1-7
1-7
a. Regional and County ...........................................
1-7
b. Geographic Distribution of Growth .................................
C. Military Population ............................................
1-8
1-10
d. Composition by Age ...........................................
1-12
2.
e. Composition by Race and Sex ...................................
Onslow County Seasonal Population ..........
1-13
1-15
3.
Onslow County Housing Characteristics ..........................
1-16
a. Number and Type of Households .................................
1-16
b. Onslow County Housing Values and Rent ..........................
1-17
C. Occupancy and Tenure
1-18
d. Single and Multi -Family Units ....................................
1-19
e. Onslow County Building Permit Activity and Housing
Structure Estimates
1-20
4.
Summary .........................................................
1-21
D.
ECONOMY.......................................................
1-22
1.
Introduction.......................................................
1-22
2.
3.
General Economic Indicators ..........................................
Employment and Income
1-25
1-27
4.
Education........................................................
1-30
5.
6.
Travel and Tourism :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Commercial Fishing
I-30
1-31
7.
Manufacturing.....................................................
1-32
8.
9.
Agriculture........................................................
Forestry ..........................................................
1-33
1-35
10.
Summary .........................................................
1-35
E.
EXISTING LAND USE ...............................................
1-36
1.
General Land Use Summary ..........................................
1-36
2.
Onslow County "Communities" ........................................
1-38
a. Jacksonville Urban Area/Camp Lejeune Community ..................
1-38
b. Traditional Rural Community
1-38
C. Coastal Community ...........................................
1-41
3.
Residential Land Use ...............................................
1-41
4.
Commercial and Industrial Land Use
1-42
5.
Institutional Land Uses ..............................................
1-43

PAGE I
6.
Transportation.....................................................
a. Roads and Highways ..........................................
1-43
1-43
b. Rail System .................................................
1-43
7.
C. Albert Ellis Airport ............................................
Basinwide Water Quality Management .................................
1-43
1-44
8.
Global Transpark...................................................
1-47
9.
Key Land Use Issues ................................................
1-47
F.
EXISTING PLANS, ORDINANCES, AND LAND USE CONTROLS .............
1-48
1.
2.
1991 Onslow County CAMA Land Use Plan Update ........................
Growth Management Program for Coastal Onslow County ...................
1-48
1-48
3.
1988 and 1998 Onslow County Recreation and Park Master Plans .............
1-49
4.
Water System Master Plan ...........................................
1-49
5.
Onslow County Sewer System Feasibility Study ...........................
1-49
6.
Flood Insurance Studies, Onslow County, North Carolina ....................
1-49
7.
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), 1991-1997 .....................
1-50
8.
Zoning Ordinance ..................................................
1-50
9.
Subdivision Regulations .............................................
1-50
10.
Off -Premises Outdoor Advertising Ordinance .............................
1-50
11.
Mobile Home Park Ordinance .........................................
1-50
12.
Emergency Management Ordinance for the County of Onslow ................
1-51
13.
National Flood Insurance, Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance ..............
1-51
14.
15.
Ordinance to Regulate Adult Businesses and Sexually -Oriented Businesses .....
North Carolina Building Code .........................................
1-51
1-52
16.
Sanitary Sewage Collection, Treatment, and Disposal Laws and Rules .........
1-52
17.
18.
Onslow County Library System ........................................
Onslow County Master Facilities Plan ...................................
1-52
1-53
19.
Onslow County Hurricane Plan ........................................
1-53
G.
LAND AND WATER USE COMPATIBILITY ANALYSIS .....................
1-53
1.
General Discussion .................................................
1-53
2.
3.
Unplanned Development .............................................
Changes in Predominant Land Uses ....................................
1-54
1-55
4.
Summary .........................................................
1-55
H.
DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINTS: LAND SUITABILITY ....................
1-56
1.
Climate..........................................................
1-56
2.
Topography/Geology................................................
1-56
3.
Groundwater .................................................
1-57
4.
Flood Hazard Areas...... .........................................
1-57
5.
Fragile Areas ......................................................
1-62
a. Coastal Wetlands .............................................
1-62
b. Coastal Waters Designations ....................................
1-62
C. Public Trust Areas ............................................
1-64
d. Estuarine Waters .............................................
1-64
e. Outstanding Resource Waters ...................................
1-64
f. Estuarine Shorelines .... .............................. .....
1-65
g. Historic and Archaeological Sites .................................
1-65
h. 404 Wetlands ................................................
1-66
i. Natural Heritage Areas ........................................
1-67

IPAGE
j. Maritime Forests ....I-67
............. • ............. • . ' ....... , , ..
k. Marinas and Mooring Fields 1-68
I. Floating Homes ..............................................
1-68
M. Sound and Estuarine Islands ....................................
n. Channel Maintenance and Interstate Waterways
1-68
1-68
6.
Soils............................................................
1-69
7.
8.
Manmade Hazards .................•...•........,..•...•....•...•.•
Slopes in Excess of 12%
I-71
1-72
9.
Areas of Resource Potential ..........................................
1-72
a. Agricultural and Forestlands....................................
b. Valuable Mineral Resources
1-72
1-73
C. Public Forests ...............................................
1-73
d. Public Gamelands............................................
e. Public Parks .................................................
1-73
1-73
f. Private Wildlife Sanctuaries .....................................
1-73
g. Marine Resources/Stormwater Runoff .............................
h. Aquaculture.................................................
1-74
1-76
I.
DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINTS: PUBLIC FACILITIES ....................
1-78
1.
Water Supply..................
1-78
2.
Wastewater Treatment and Disposal ....................................
1-80
3.
Solid Waste Disposal ................................................
1-83
4.
Education Facilities...
I-84
5.
Recreation • • ..... • . • ... . .......... • .... • ....... • • .... • ...
1-87
6.
Transportation.....................................................
1-91
a. Roads .....................................................
1-91
b. Rail System .................................................
1-92
C. Navigable Waters .............................................
1-92
7.
d. Air Transportation.....
Other County Facilities/Services •.•..•.....,•,.......•.•.........••....
I-94
1-96
SECTION II: PROJECTED LAND DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS
A. PROJECTED POPULATION GROWTH AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ....
II-1
1.
2.
General Discussion ..................................................
Year -Round Population Projections ......................................
II-1
II-1
3.
Seasonal Population .................................................
11-4
4.
B.
Projected Housing Characteristics .......................................
PROJECTED ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TRENDS AND RELATED LAND
II-5
USE ISSUES .......................................................
II-6
1.
General Economic Projections .........................................
11-6
2.
Agriculture and Forestry
II-8
3.
Manufacturing......................................................
II-8
4.
Finance, Real Estate, and Construction ..................................
II-8
5.
Wholesale Trade, Retail Trade, and Services
II-9
6.
Government Employment .............................................
II-9
7.
Commercial Fishing ..................................................
II-9

PAGE
C. PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT NEEDS AND LAND USE ISSUES ....... II-10
1. Water Supply ...................................................... II-10
2. Wastewater Treatment and Disposal .................................... II-10
3. Solid Waste Disposal ................................................ II-12
4. Educational Facilities ................................................ II-12
5. Recreation........................................................11-13
6. Transportation.....................................................II-14
a. Roads.....................................................11-14
b. Rail System and Navigable Waters ............................... II-16
C. Air Transportation............................................11-17
7. Other County Facilities .............................................. II-18
D. REDEVELOPMENT ISSUES .......................................... 11-20
SECTION III: LAND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM ...............................
III-1
SECTION IV: ONSLOW COUNTY POLICY STATEMENTS
A.
VISION STATEMENT ...............................................
IV-2
B.
RESOURCE PROTECTION POLICY STATEMENTS .......................
IV-3
C.
RESOURCE PRODUCTION AND MANAGEMENT POLICIES ...............
IV-11
D.
ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ........................
IV-15
E.
CONTINUING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION POLICIES ......................
IV-29
F.
STORM HAZARD MITIGATION, POST -DISASTER RECOVERY,
AND EVACUATION PLANS .........................................
IV-30
SECTION V: RELATIONSHIP OF POLICIES AND LAND CLASSIFICATION
A.
URBAN TRANSITION ................................................
V-1
B.
LIMITED TRANSITION ...............................................
V-1
C.
COMMUNITY......................................................
V-1
D.
RURAL WITH SERVICES .............................................
V-2
E.
RURAL...........................................................
V-2
F.
CONSERVATION...................................................
V-2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

PAGE
TABLES
Table 1
Total Population and Percent Change for CAMA-Regulated
'
Table 2
Counties and State, 1980, 1990, 1995, and 1996 ..............
Onslow County - Summary of Year -Round Population Growth,
1-7
1970-1995............................................
1-9
Table 3
Onslow County - Township Population Summary, 1960-1990 .....
1-10
Table 4
Military Population - Active/Retired, Dependents, and Civilian
Employees...........................................
1-12
Table 5
Onslow County and the State of North Carolina - Total Population
by Age, 1990 and 1995..................................
1-12
Table 6
Onslow County - Total Percentage of Total Population by Age
Group, 1990-1995 ......................................
1-13
Table 7
Onslow County - Number and Percent Increase by Race and Sex,
1980-1995............................................
1-14
Table 8
Stump Sound and Swansboro Townships, 1991 and 1996 - Peak
Table 9
Seasonal Dwelling Population (Non -Beach Portions) ...........
Onslow County and State of North Carolina - Households by Type
1-15
1-17
Table 10
Onslow County and State of North Carolina - Value and Rent,
Table 11
1990................................................
Onslow County and State of North Carolina - Occupancy and
1-18
Tenure, 1980 and 1990..................................
1-19
Table 12
Onslow County and State of North Carolina - Units in Structure
and Mobile Home Count, 1990 ............................
1-20
Table 13
Onslow County - Summary of Residential Building Permit Activity,
1990-1997 .
1-20
Table 14
CAMA Regulated Counties - One, Five, and Ten -Year Composite
Table 15
Rankings of Economic Development ........................
Onslow County - Summary of Economic Indicators, 1990 and 1995
1-24
1-25
Table 16
Onslow County - County and State Unemployment Rates, 1992-
1995................................................
1-26
Table 17
Onslow County - Gross Retail Sales, FY89-90 and FY95-96 .....
1-26
Table 18
Onslow County Wage and Salary Employment by Sector -
Employed Persons 16 Years and Over, First Quarter, 1995 ......
1-27
Table 19
Onslow County - Camp Lejeune and Marine Corps Air Station at
New River Direct and Indirect Economic Impact, 1995 ..........
1-28
Table 20
Onslow County - Travel Time to Work, Workers 16 Years and
Table 21
Over, 1990 ...........................................
Onslow County - Household Income ........................
1-29
1-29
Table 22
Onslow County and the State of North Carolina - Educational
Attainment, 1990.......................................
1-30
Table 23
Onslow County - Travel and Tourism Expenditure Impact
Estimates for 1989 through 1994 ..........................
1-31

PAGE
Table 24
Onslow County - Finfish and Shellfish Landings ...............
1-31
Table 25
Onslow County - Major Manufacturing Employers .............
1-33
Table 26
Onslow County - Estimated Income from Sale of Farm Products
1-34
and Government Payments ..............................
Table 27
Onslow County - Acreage Estimates of Municipalities and
Regulatory Jurisdiction ..................................
1-37
Table 28
Onslow County - Generalized Existing Land Use Estimate, 1997 ..
1-37
Table 29
Table 30
Onslow County - Subdivision Activity by Townships, 1992-1997 ...
Onslow County - Ten Largest Subdivisions Approved Between
1-41
1992-1997............................................
1-42
Table 31
Onslow County - Watersheds .............................
1-45
Table 32
Onslow County - NPDES Permits ..........................
1-81
Table 33
Onslow County Schools-1990-1991 to 1998-1999 ............
1-84
�.
Table 34
Camp Lejeune School District - Enrollment for December 31, 1996
and September 28, 1990.................................
1-86
Table 35
Onslow County - Marinas and Dockages ....................
1-89
Table 36
Onslow County - DOT Projects Currently Under Construction ....
1-92
Table 37
Albert Ellis Airport - Summary of Airport Activity ...............
1-94
Table 38
Albert J. Ellis Airport - Transportation Improvement Program .....
1-95
Table 39
Onslow County - Summary of Year -Round Population Growth,
1995-2005............................................
II-1
Table 40
Onslow County - Average Annual Year -Round Population Growth
Rate and Percent Change, 1995-2005 ......................
II-2
Table 41
Onslow County, 1995-2005 - Total Population by Age and Percent
Change..............................................
II-3
Table 42
Onslow County, 1995-2005 - Population and Percent Increase by
Race and Sex .........................................
II-3
Table 43
Stump Sound and Swansboro Townships - Peak Seasonal
Population and Total Peak Population Projections .............
11-4
Table 44
Onslow County - Projected Demand for Housing Units by Type,
1995-2005............................................
11-5
Table 45
Onslow County - Growth of Income -Producing Industries, 1995,
2000,and 2005........................................
11-6
Table 46
Onslow County - Rank of Industry by Employment & Earnings,
1995 and 2005........................................
II-7
Table 47
Onslow County Schools - State Bond Expenditures ............
II-13
Table 48
Onslow County - NCDOT 1996 Transportation Improvement Plan
II-14
Table 49
Albert Ellis Airport - Summary of Forecast Aviation Activity, 2000
and 2010.............................................
11-17
Table 50
Albert Ellis Airport - Airport Facility Development
Recommendations .....................................
11-17

L
PAGE
MAPS
Map 1
Onslow County Townships .......
1-11
Map 2
Onslow County Existing Land Use ................. . ......
1-39
Map 3
Onslow County "Communities" ............................
1-40
Map 4
Onslow County Watersheds ..............................
1-46
Map 5
Onslow County Drinking Water Supply ......................
1-58
Map 6
Onslow County Flood Hazard Map .........................
1-59
Map 7
Onslow County Storm Surge Inundation Areas ................
1-61
Map 8
Onslow County Areas of Environmental Concern and Natural
Fragile Areas
1-63
.
Map 9
Onslow County General Soils Map .........................
1-70
Map 10
Onslow County Water Quality Use Classes ..................
1-77
Map 11
Onslow County Water System ............................
1-79
Map 12
Onslow County Average Daily Traffic Counts, 1995 ............
1-93
Map 13
Onslow County Community Facilities .......................
1-98
Map 14
Onslow County Land Classification Map .....................
III-5
APPENDICES
Appendix I Onslow County Volunteer Fire Departments ISO Ratings
Appendix II Policies Considered But Not Adopted
Appendix III Onslow County Citizen Participation Plan

1
U
SECTION I: ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
A. INTRODUCTION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF INFORMATION BASE
This 1997 Land Use Plan Update for Onslow County is prepared in accordance with requirements
of the North Carolina Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA). Specifically, this document
complies with Subchapter 7B, "Land Use Planning Guidelines," of the North Carolina
Administrative Code, as amended, September 28, 1995.
The 7B guidelines define the following intent of land use plans:
"Local governments, through the land use planning process, address issues and
adopt policies that guide the development of their community. Many decisions
affecting development are made by other levels of government, and local policies
must take account of and coincide with established state and federal policies. Most
decisions, however, are primarily of local concern. By carefully and explicitly
addressing these issues, other levels of government will follow local policies that
deal with these issues. State and federal agencies will use the local land use plans
and policies in making project consistency, funding, and permit decisions. Policies
which consider the type of development to be encouraged, the density and
patterns of development, and the methods of providing beach access are
examples of these local policy decisions.
The land use plan shall contain the following basic elements:
1) Executive Summary;
2) Introduction;
3) Goals and Objectives;
4) Data Collection and Analysis;
5) Present Conditions;
6) Constraints;
7) Estimated Demands;
8) Policy Statements;
9) Land Classification;
10) Intergovernmental Coordination and Implementation; and
11) Public Participation.
In addition to these basic elements, the 7B guidelines require that the following issues be
addressed in the plan:
1) Resource Protection
2) Resource Production and Management
3) Economic and Community Development
4) Continuing Public Participation
5) Storm Hazard Mitigation, Post -Disaster Recovery and Evacuation Plans
1-1

This land use plan provides a guide for development of Onslow County by addressing issues and
adopting policies that are relevant to the county. Specifically, this land use plan provides the
following:
1) an analysis of existing conditions, including a land use map;
2) a projected land development analysis;
3) a summary of public interests and participation;
4) a land classification system;
5) a detailed section on policy statements;
6) an analysis of the carrying capacity of public facilities with a demand/supply
analysis;
7) a description of scheduled transportation improvements;
8) a discussion of basinwide water quality management;
9) a summary of 404 wetland areas and issues,
10) an explanation of the relationship of the policies to the land classification.
It should be noted that the policy section of the plan is the most important part of the document.
State and federal agencies will use the local land use policies in making project consistency,
funding, and permit decisions.
The 1991 Onslow County Land Use Plan included policy statements which addressed the five
policy areas. Those policies supported, or in some cases exceeded, the 15A NCAC 7H minimum
use standards. The following identifies by policy area those policies which exceeded the 15A
NCAC 7H use standards:
RESOURCE PROTECTION POLICIES
Areas of Environmental Concern
Estuarine System
Estuarine Outstanding Resource Water (ORW): Within the Stump Sound and Bear Island ORWs, no new
or expanded marinas will be allowed. A new or expanded marina shall be as defined by the North Carolina
Division of Coastal Management. The addition of even a single slip constitutes an expansion.
Fraaile or Hazardous Land Areas
Maritime Forest
the high tracts of maritime forest for conservation
The county shall encourage acquisition of quality purposes.
Development within mature, high -quality tracts of maritime forest shall be of a residential nature only and
shall be restricted to one dwelling unit for each 80,000 square feet of area proposed for development, except
for Huggins Island.
The maritime forests on Huggins Island shall be protected by limiting clearing and other site disturbances
to the minimum necessary to provide for construction of the principal structure, accessory use, parking area,
septic tank nitrification system and driveway access. In no case, shall more than 35 percent of a building
site property be cleared or otherwise subject to ground disturbing activity. Existing natural wetlands, ponds
and swales shall not be dredged, filled or otherwise altered except for road and utility line crossings
authorized by permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
1-2

IMarinas, Floating Home Development, and Boat Dry Stack Storage Facilities
It is county policy to prohibit floating homes.
Industrial Impacts on Fragile Areas
Within coastal wetlands, estuarine waters, and public trust water, no industrial use will be permitted unless
such use is water related.
This policy applies to both new industrial development and to expansion of existing industrial facilities.
Development of Sound and Estuarine Svstem Islands
For all sound and estuarine system islands within the regulatory jurisdiction of the county (with the exception
of Huggins Island), the county discourages development of any sound or estuarine system island outside of
very low density residential development. Very low density development is defined in this policy as one
dwelling unit per 80,000 square feet of land area, at a minimum. Additionally, county zoning, CAMA minor
or major permitting requirements must be met.
. Huggins Island is singled out for a specific development policy. Located near Swansboro at the confluence
1 of White Oak River and the ocean, this 100 acre (approximately) island contains maritime forest and has
been studied by the NC Division of Coastal Management. The owners of the island have recorded deed
restrictions prepared in association with the Division of Coastal Management and the staff of the Nature
Conservancy. The intent of the deed restrictions is to limit development and protect the maritime forest and
other resources. The deed restrictions are in the form of restrictive covenants.
In addition to these specific statements, the 1991 policy statements generally expressed the
following:
-- Support for protection of significant architectural, archaeological, and cultural resources.
-- Support for protection of groundwater resources.
-- Support for construction of state -approved package treatment plants.
-- Support for upland excavation for marina basins.
-- Support for bulkhead installation consistent with state guidelines.
-- Support for all agencies and programs involved with the management of commercial forest
resources.
-- Support for tourism.
-- Support for Marine Fisheries Commission regulations.
-- Support efforts to secure economic development grants to develop a seafood processing
facility in the county.
-- Support for environmentally safe industrial development.
I-- Support for increased water and sewer service.
1 1-3

-- Support for redevelopment and rehabilitation of deteriorated areas through state and
federal programs.
-- Support for erosion control regulations as mandated by the State Sedimentation Control
Act.
-- Support of state stormwater management regulations.
-- Support for additional shoreline access areas.
-- Support for channel maintenance.
-- Support for oil and gas drilling operations and attendant onshore support facilities provided
an environmental impact statement has been prepared and a finding of no significant
impact on the environment has been made.
-- Support for the Clean County Committee and their efforts to reduce litter and protect the
natural environment.
-- Support for the development of a civic center in Onslow County or Jacksonville.
Listed below are some of the sources and documents utilized during preparation of this land use
plan.
Data Sources I
Onslow County Department of Environmental Health
-- Onslow County Department of Health
-- Onslow County Department of Parks and Recreation
-- Onslow County Department of Social Services
-- Onslow County Economic Development Council, Inc.
-- Onslow County Fire Marshal
-- Onslow County Manager's Office
— Onslow County Planning Department
-- Onslow County School Board
-- North Carolina Department of Commerce, Business/Industry Development Division
-- North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,. Division of Coastal
Management
-- North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of
Environmental Management, Groundwater Section.
-- North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of
Environmental Management, Solid Waste Management Branch
-- North Carolina Department of Transportation, Division of Highways
-- North Carolina Division of Aging
-- North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries
-- North Carolina Division of Shellfish Sanitation
North Carolina Division of Travel and Tourism
North Carolina Division of Veterans' Affairs
North Carolina Employment Security Commission, Labor Market Information Division
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program I
1-4 1

-- Office of State Budget and Management, State Data Center
- United States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District Office
United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census
United States Fish and Wildlife Services
-- Untied States Marine Corps, Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune.
References
-- 1988 Subdivision Impact Study. Onslow County Planning Department, 1989.
— 1988 West Onslow Beach Carrying Capacity Study. Howard T. Capps and Associates,
1988.
— 1989 Onslow County Subdivision Impact Study. Onslow County Planning Department,
1989.
— A Growth Management Plan for Coastal Onslow County - Phase I. Onslow County
Planning Department, 1989.
-- A Growth Management Plan for Queen's Creek/Swansboro Township, Onslow County
Planning Department, 1989.
-- Albert Ellis Airport Master Plan Study. Parrish and Associates, 1985.
-- Armingeon, Neil Alan. An Analysis of Coastal Growth and Development in North Carolina.
Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Division of Coastal Management, 1989.
-- Camp Lejeune Economic Impact. Comptroller Office and Training Support Division, Marine
Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, 1995.
-- City of Jacksonville 1991 CAMA Land Use Plan Update. North Carolina Coastal
Management Program, 1991.
-- Environmental Effects of Potential Development Activities in Coastal Onslow County. John
J. Hooten and Associates, 1980.
-- Kasarda, John D. Transportation Infrastructure for Competitive Success in the Fast
Century. Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC,
1995.
— Master Facilities Plan Executive Summary. Onslow County Administration, 1998.
-- North Carolina Fisheries Rules for Coastal Waters, 1996-1997. North Carolina Marine
Fisheries Commission, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, 1996.
-- North Carolina Municipal Population, 1995. North Carolina Office of State Planning. Fall,
1996.
— Onslow County Emergency Operations Plan for Multi -Hazards. Onslow County
Emergency Management Office, 1990.
1 1-5

-- Onslow County Library System, Operation Library Agenda for Change, June 1996. 1
-- Onslow County Hurricane Plan. Onslow County Emergency Management Office, 1997.
-- Onslow County Land Use Plan, 1991. Onslow County Planning Board and County Board
of Commissioners, 1991.
-- Onslow County Mobile Home Park Study. Onslow County Planning Department, 1988.
-- Onslow County Sewer System Feasibility Study. Hazen and Sawyer Engineers, 1987.
-- Parks and Recreation Master Plan for Onslow County, NC. Department of Recreation and
Leisure Studies, East Carolina University, 1998.
— Queen's Creek/Swansboro Township Special Study Growth Management Analysis.
Onslow County Planning Department and Planning Board, 1989. .
-- The Economic Development Yearbook for North Carolina. Problem Solving Research,
Inc., 1995.
The Practice of Local Government Planning, Frank S. So, Editor. Washington, DC:
International City Management Association, 1988.
-- Wastewater Transportation and Treatment Facilities Plan. James E. Stewart and
Associates, Inc., 1987.
-- Water System Master Plan. Black and Veatch Engineers -Architects, 1990.
-- West Onslow Beach Land Use Study, 1987. Onslow County Planning Department, 1987.
-- Woods and Poole Economics, Inc. Carteret County, North Carolina, 1989 Data Pamphlet.
Washington, DC: Woods and Poole Economics, Inc., 1989.
B. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
The following provides a list of the objectives/goals identified for this land use plan update:
-- An updated land use plan based on an effective citizen participation process.
-- Development of new policies/strategies required to respond to revised 15A NCAC 713
planning requirements.
-- Assessment of the impact of 404 wetlands on Onslow County.
-- County -wide economic impact.
-- Assess impact of expansion of military air space.
-- Preservation of water quality in the New and White Oak Rivers. ,
-- Regulation of density adjacent to ORW s and primary fisheries areas.
-- Assessment of the need for county -wide thoroughfare planning.
-- Protection of AEC's.
e
�

IC. DEMOGRAPHICS AND HOUSING
1
1. Onslow County Permanent Population
a. Regional and County
Sixteen of the twenty North Carolina counties regulated by the Coastal Area Management
Act (CAMA) experienced a net permanent population growth from 1990 to 1996. As Table 1
indicates, the four counties with a negative population growth were Hertford, Hyde, Tyrrell, and
Washington.'
Table 1
Total Population and Percent Change for
CAMA-Regulated Counties and State, 1980, 1990, 1995, and 1996
Percent Change
County
1980
1990
1995
1996
'90= 96
Beaufort
40,355
42,283
43,330
43,210
2.2%
Bertie
21,024
20,388
20,638
20,532
0.7%
Brunswick
35,777
50,985
60,739
62,856
23.3%
Camden
5,829
5,904
6,316
6,356
7.7%
Carteret
41,092
52,553
57,612
58,341
11.0%
Chowan
12,558
13,506
14,031
14,152
4.8%
Craven
71,043
81,613
85,816
87,174
6.8%
Currituck
11,089
13,736
15,818
16,372
19.2%
Dare
13,377
22,746
25,758
26,542
16.7%
Gates
8,875
9,305
9,798
9,864
6.0%
Hertford
23,368
22,523
22,468
22,214
-1.4%
Hyde
5,873
5,411
5,211
5,191
-4.1%
New Hanover
103,471
120,284
139,577
143,430
19.2%
Onslow
112,784
149,838
147,912
150,216
0.3%
Pamlico
10,398
11,368
11,869
12,010
5.6%
Pasquotank
28,462
31,298
33,290
33,848
8.1%
Pender
22,262
28,855
34,671
35,978
24.7%
Perquimans
9,486
10,447
10,650
10,756
3.0%
Tyrrell
3,975
3,856
3,812
3,671
-4.8%
Washington
14,801
13,997
13,766
13,504
-3.5%
Total CAMA Counties
595,899
710,896
763,082
776,217
9.2%
State of North Carolina
5,880,095
6,632,448
7,194,238
7,323,085
10.4%
Source: Office of State Planning.
'Onslow County believes that the Office of State Planning population estimates are incorrect. Military
population percentages should not reflect a population decline from 1990-1995.
1-7

Between 1990-1996, Onslow County's population increased by 0.3% while the total i
population for the twenty CAMA-regulated counties and the entire state increased by 28.1 % and
22.3%, respectively. Although Onslow County experienced minimal growth in population during
the five year period, the county remains the most populated CAMA-regulated county and the ninth
most populated county in the state.
b. Geographic Distribution of Growth
Table 2 provides a summary of year-round population growth for Onslow County's
municipalities and unincorporated areas. It should be noted that population figures for the towns
of North Topsail Beach and Surf City are not available prior to their incorporation. Therefore,
blanks have been included in Table 2 for pre -incorporated years. During the twenty-five year
period, 1970-1995, the City of Jacksonville experienced the largest rate of population growth
(360.9%), followed by Holly Ridge (84.8%), and Richlands (35.6%). The total population of all the
Onslow County municipalities increased by 323.7%, while the population of the county's
unincorporated areas decreased by-19.3%. In 1995, the population of the county's municipalities
amassed 54.0% of the county's total population, compared to just 18.3% in 1970. This trend,
consisting of a shrinking unincorporated area population, is due largely to the number of
annexations and incorporations which occurred during the period.
During the period 1990-1995, the population growth rate for the City of Jacksonville far
exceeded the growth rates for the remaining Onslow County municipalities. This is due to the fact
that in 1990, the City of Jacksonville annexed a portion of Camp Lejeune including a population
of approximately 40,000 active military personnel.
1
a
�

Table 2
Onslow County
Summary of Year -Round Population Growth, 1970-1995
Year -Round Population
Percentage
Change
Overall
Municipality/Area
1970
1980
1990
1995
'70280
'80290
'90295
'70-'95
1) Holly Ridge
415
465
728
767
12.0%
56.6%
5.4%
84.8%
2) Jacksonville
16,289
18,259
30,398
75,069
12.1%
66.5%
147.0%
360.9%
3) North Topsail Beach [11
301
947
1,070
214.6%
13.0%
4) Richlands
935
825
996
1,268
-11.8%
20.7%
27.3%
35.6%
5) Surf City (Part) [2]
317
333
5.0%
6) Swansboro
1,207
976
1,165
1,351
-19.1%
19.4%
16.0%
11.9%
Total Municipalities
18,846
20,826
34,551
79,858
10.5%
65.9%
131.1%
323.7%
Total Unincorporated Areas
84,280
91,958
115,287
68,054
9.1%
25.4%
-41.0%
-19.3%
Total County
103,126
112,784
149,838
147,912
9.4%
32.9%
-1.3%
43.4%
Source: North Carolina Office of State Planning; extrapolation of data for unincorporated areas by Holland Consulting Planners, Inc.
[1] Incorporated after 1990; separation counts for 1980 and 1990 are from Office of State Planning.
[2] Annexed after the 1980 Census.
Wl

L'I
Onslow County is divided into the following five townships: Jacksonville, Richlands, Stump
Sound, Swansboro, and White Oak. Map 1 indicates the location of these townships and their
boundaries.
In 1990, the population within the Jacksonville Township comprised just under 50% of the
county's total population. The Swansboro and White Oak Townships included approximately 37%
of the county's total population and the remaining 13% was divided between the Richlands and
Stump Sound Townships. Table 3 provides a summary of Onslow County's population by
township. It should be noted that the most recent available population data by townships for
Onslow County is the 1990 U.S. Census.
Table 3
Onslow County
Township Population Summary, 1960-1990
Township 1990
1980
1970
1960
Jacksonville 74,123
54,111
55,737
40,834
Richlands 10,708
9,006
7,572
7,331
Stump Sound 10,148
7,500
5,545
5,486
Swansboro 28,651
23,380
20,800
21,678
White Oak 26,208
18,787
13,472
10,879
County Totals 149,838
112,784
103,126
86,208
Source: 1991 Onslow County Land Use Plan and
1990 U.S. Census.
C. Military Population
Camp Lejeune is by far the most dominant factor in the county's population and economic
profiles. Persons associated with the Base total over 126,000, most of whom live in the county.
It is estimated that approximately ten percent of the military community (active duty military and
dependents, retire military and dependents, and civilian employees) live outside of the county.
Therefore, at least 113,000 residents of Onslow County are directly associated with Camp
Lejeune. Table 4 shows the components of the military -related population for selected months
between 1985-1996.
1]
11
-10

To
���//�
i _•�
�`• CARTERET
J
r, 'ram_
VNTY
The preparation of this ma was financed in
P P P
"�
a3a
t 7s6
`�i 41
�� f� '' '
L. ��. •' L1„
_ 00
`';
part through a grant provided by the North
;
f1
`River
Carolina Coastal Management Program,
4 9 1437
1442 1443
438
through funds provided by the Coastal Zone
�;—
434
1434
wu+sa0RO
Management Act of 1972, as amended, which
142 435 143
is administered by the Office of Ocean and
1�33
133
,
Coastal Resource Management, National
1436
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
;
142
jl 33
=
2
425
150
1423 1428
150
.1
fief
0
�• �
r
WHITE OAK TOWNSHIP
-
413
15o0
503
/
1410
1808
1654
0 1 0
1411
i
324
SWANSBORO TOWNSHIP
U.
130
/
1324
Air Base
O
1303 310 1307
am Le'eune rine Corps
1302
_
311
/ 130 07
�O
/ 1308
1rt3i0Ju+og
u
�
0� o' �%
1317
JACK °rnnuF ew
N
c
314 ,
River
H 1300 S HW - 258
315
j 1230 . a
ti
221 1224
Marine Corp
123823
122
JACKSONVILLE TOWNSHIP
Air Station
j ?2
at New River
ra
`" —•—•�. RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP
1
3
Bay
2212
m •\` 1230 249
215
1113
\` 285
213 1 1
162 1 15
11
1219
1134
`220
�
1216
4
5
usver
1218 E
AIRPORT
1
116 1119
1209
121
109 12
•� 1210
1210
203
1111
c '
120
`
108
21
=
�G
107
NORTH TOPSAIL BEACH L
- Z - •�M
-
-
i'
IO
Gyj,
1203 ;
105
518 I
Q`
�•�
20Z
z
STUMP SOUND TOWNSHIP
r 152
1529
201
1544
\
.\
1104 GREATER SANDY RUN
1518
154
15 I
TRAINING AREA
LEGEND
Z
N
534
CORPORATE LIMITS
A `
�`'�
Y
RIME
MAP 1
MUNICIPAL EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION
�•�.`
_
-
-
` _
PENCE R C �`'�•�.�.
SURF
-~ - TOWNSHIPS
pUN Ty `'�•�
"o
ONSLOW'COUNTY'
4
I-1 1
miles
Q I 4
SCALE

Ll
ITable 4
Military Population
Active/Retired, Dependents, and Civilian Employees
Total Dependents
Total Retired
Civilian Employed
MonthNear
Active
& Dependents
Employees
June, 1985
43,304
31,674
33,351
4,489
May, 1990
44,026
52,565
25,033
4,691
May, 1991
46,001
54,871
25,678
4,470
November, 1996
41,110
57,000
23,970
4,800
'
Source: 1991 City of Jacksonville Land
Use Plan and Camp Lejeune.
I
During the eleven -year period shown in Table 4, two noteworthy trends can be identified.
First, not only did the total dependents increase by 80%, but the ratio of dependents per active
military person increased from 0.73 to 1.38. This is perhaps indicative of larger military families.
Another trend is the decline in total retired and their dependents.
d. Composition by Age
Camp Lejeune has a significant impact on the county's composition by age group due to
the high number of military personnel between 18-34 years of age. Table 5 provides a
comparison between the age group composition of Onslow County and the State of North
Carolina.
Table 5
Onslow County and the State of North Carolina
Total Population by Age, 1990 and 1995
1990 1995
Age
0-4
5-17
18-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65-74
75&Up
Totals
Onslow County
North Carolina
% of
% of
Population
Total
Population
Total
13,542
9%
456,336
7%
22,730
15%
1,152,157
17%
40,742
27%
766,650
12%
33,743
23%
1,152,229
17%
16,967
11%
1,008,277
15%
8,958
6%
705,099
11 %
6,600
4%
585,832
9%
4,448
3%
486,119
7%
2,108
1 %
315,938
5%
149,838
100%
6,628,637
100%
Onslow County
North Carolina
% of
% of
Population
Total
Population
Total
13,888
9%
503,804
7%
23,353
16%
1,251,981
17%
36,221
24%
746,908
10%
33,115
22%
1,102,321
15%
17,733
12%
1,148,463
16%
9,746
7%
880,047
12%
6,788
5%
613,330
9%
4,569
3%
546,772
8%
2,499
2%
375,882
5%
147,912
100%
7,169,508
100%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau and PCensus EQUIFAX National Decision Systems WEFA.
1-12

In Onslow County, persons between 18 and 34 years of age comprised 47% of the
county's total population in 1995. This figure is much higher than the state's percentage (26%)
for the 18-34 age group. In addition, the percentage of persons aged 0-4 years in Onslow County
exceeded the state's percentage by 2%. Due to the high concentration of persons in the 0-4, 18-
24, and 25-34 age groups, all other county age groups have percentages lower than the state.
Between the years 1990-1995, age groups 5-17, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64, and 75 & Up,
experienced increases in the percent of total county population, while the age groups 18-24 and
25-34 experienced decreases. The age groups 0-4 and 65-74 experienced no change in percent
of total county population during the same period.
Table 6 summarizes changes which occurred between 1990-1995 for various age groups.
The two most notable changes relevant to planners include the slight increase in school aged
children and the decrease in the younger working population. The decrease in the younger
working population is due largely to the decrease which occurred in Camp Lejeune personnel
during the period.
Table 6
Onslow County
Total Percentage of Total Population by Age Group, 1990-1995
Net Change
Age Group
1990
1995
1990-1995
Preschool & School
Age Population (0-17)
24.2%
25.2%
+1.0%
Younger Working
Population (18-34)
49.7%
46.9%
-2.8%
Middle -Aged Working
Population (35-54)
17.3%
18.6%
+1.3%
Older Working
Population (55-64)
4.4%
4.6%
+0.2%
Elderly Population
(65 and up)
4.4%
4.8%
+0.4%
Source: Holland Consulting Planners, Inc.
e. Composition by Race and Sex
The analysis of Onslow County's racial composition is an important part of this study of
recent demographic trends, since changes in minority population profoundly affect issues such
as housing and economic and community development in eastern North Carolina. This
information is provided in Table 7.

Table 7
Onslow County
Number and Percent Increase by Race and Sex, 1980-1995
Total Population
Percent Change
Category 1980* 1990** 1995***
'80 '90
'90295
Total White 85,498 111,718 106,860
30.7%
-4.3%
Males 50,083 67,072 64,182
33.9%
-4.3%
Females 35,415 44,646 42,678
26.1 %
-4.4%
Total Black 22,775 29,790 31,642
30.8%
6.2%
Males 13,631 17,829 18,937
30.8%
6.2%
Females 9,144 11,961 12,705
30.8%
6.2%
American Indian/Eskimo/Aleut 589 1,088 1,229
84.7%
13.0%
Asian/Pacific Islander 1,417 3,062 3,520
116.1%
15.0%
Other Minorities 2,505 4,180 4,661
66.9%
11.5%
Total County 112,784 149,838 147,912
32.9%
-1.3%
Hispanic Origin**** 4,373 7,931 10,793
81.4%
36.1%
Sources: *1991 Onslow County Land Use Plan and Holland Consulting Planners, Inc.
**1990 U.S. Census.
***EQUIFAX National Decision System WEFA.
****Persons of Hispanic origin are those who classified
themselves as "Mexican,"
"Puerto Rican," or "Cuban" --as well as those who indicated that they were of "other
Spanish/Hispanic" origin on the U.S. Census. The total
that has been provided for
persons of Hispanic origin is distributed among all of the various race categories
found in this table.
11
11
In 1995, approximately 72% of the Onslow County population was white, 22% black, and
the remaining 6% occupied by other minorities. In addition, approximately 7% of the county's
population was of hispanic origin in 1995.
Between 1980-1990, the county's white and black populations grew at approximately the
same rate while the other minorities segment of the population grew at a rate greater than the
white and black population combined.
Due to the decrease in the county's total population, all of the race categories in Table 7
experienced slower growth rates during the 1990-1995 period than during the 1980-1990 period.
However, the black and other minorities segments of the population maintained positive growth
rates between 1990-1995, while the white segment of the population experienced a negative
growth rate.
In 1995, the number of males in each of the race categories exceeded the number of
females. The male/female ratio for the county as a whole was 59% male to 41 % female. This
trend began with the inception of Camp Lejeune and its associated large percentage of male
personnel.
1-14

2. Onslow County Seasonal Population Z I
In January, 1990, the Town of North Topsail Beach was incorporated, removing this seasonally
oriented attraction from the county's planning jurisdiction. Seasonal population usually associated
with beachfront communities is therefore no longer a primary concern of the plan updating
process.
Certain portions of the county, particularly in the estuarine areas of Stump Sound and Swansboro
Townships, experience a slight increase in population due to tourism and summer residents.
According to the 1991 Onslow County Land Use Plan Update, in 1991 these townships combined
had 227 dwellings that were predominantly for seasonal use. Assuming an average of 4.0
persons per seasonal dwelling unit, in 1991, the Stump Sound and Swansboro Townships had
seasonal dwelling unit populations of 476 and 408 persons, respectively.
It has been estimated that between 1991-1996, approximately 800 building permits were issued '
for residential construction within the Stump Sound and Swansboro Townships. Assuming each
of these permits resulted in the construction of a new dwelling, in 1996, there were approximately
6,590 total dwellings within the Stump Sound and Swansboro Townships. In 1990, 3.8% of the
total dwellings in these townships were predominantly for seasonal use. Based on this
percentage, in 1996, there were 250 dwellings for seasonal use with an associated seasonal
dwelling unit population of 1,000.
Table 8 summarizes the peak seasonal population for seasonal dwellings located within the Stump
Sound and Swansboro Townships. These townships were chosen because they are the only
Onslow County townships that have a significant number of seasonal dwellings.
Table 8
Stump Sound and Swansboro Townships, 1991 and 1996
Peak Seasonal Dwelling Population
(Non -Beach Portions)
Total
Seasonal Seasonal
Total Peak
Place
Dwellings
Dwellings Pop.**
Perm. Pop.
Seasonal Pop.
1991
Stump Sound Township*
2,384
119 476
10,148
10,624
Swansboro Township
3,403
102 408
28,651
29,059
1996
Stump Sound Township*
2,715
136 544
9,992
10,536
Swansboro Township
3,875
114 456
28,210
28,666
NOTES: *Less Topsail Island; **Based upon an average of 4.0 persons per seasonal dwelling.
Source: 1991 Onslow County Land Use Plan Update; Onslow County Building Permit Department. I
2This section does not address or include figures for "day visitor" usage of Onslow County recreational
facilities, water, and natural areas. Thus, the actual daytime seasonal population figures are higher than
those stated in this section. Accurate "day visitor" data is not available.
I-15 '

J
H
A seasonal population increase of 1,000 persons in the Stump Sound and Swansboro Townships
is fairly insignificant compared to a total permanent population of 38,202. The number of "day
visitors" both passing through and reaching final destination in Onslow County have a far greater
impact on county facilities and infrastructure. However, day visitor data is not available for Onslow
County, nor can it be accurately estimated.
Several commercial clusters experience a dramatic increase in business during summer months.
Examples include "Four Corners" (NC 172 at NC 210), Topsail Way Shopping Center, Sneads
Ferry/Fulchers Landing and the Swansboro area. This is due to the summer peak population of
North Topsail Beach, and an unestimated number of visitors to Surf City and Topsail Beach in
Pender County.
Although Topsail Island is no longer a primary concern of this Plan update, the seasonal
population fluctuations directly impact mainland Onslow County. According to the 1991 Onslow
County Land Use Plan Update, the permanent population of North Topsail Beach was 752
persons and the peak seasonal daytime population was approximately 15,147 persons.
However, on September 5, 1996, Hurricane Fran hit the North Carolina coast destroying a
significant number of year-round and seasonal housing units in North Topsail Beach. A portion
of these units cannot be replaced because either the lot was lost or CAMA regulations prohibit
replacement. This will decrease both the town's permanent population and peak seasonal
population. In addition, the destruction of public beach access sites and the general appearance
of the beach will act as deterrents to seasonal guests. Therefore, the impact of the peak seasonal
population and day visitors may be significantly less in North Topsail Beach and Onslow County
until there has been adequate time to rebuild.
3. Onslow County Housing Characteristics
The most recent available data summarizing housing conditions in Onslow County is included in
the 1990 U.S. Census of Population and Housing. This information was available and included
in the 1991 Onslow County Land Use Plan Update. Therefore, the majority of the information
provided in this section has been taken directly from the 1991 Land Use Plan Update. However,
in order to provide some indication of current housing conditions, a summary of the county's
building permit activity since 1990 has been included.
a. Number and Type of Households
Table 9 shows the total number of households in Onslow County by type. The following
observations can be made:
-- Family households constitute a higher percentage (81.1 %) in Onslow County than
in the state (72.0%);
-- The average household size in Onslow County is higher (2.84 persons) than the
state average (2.54 persons); and
-- Persons living in group quarters in Onslow County is much greater (23.1 %) than
the state as a whole (3.4%).
1-16

Table 9
Onslow County and State of North Carolina
Households By Type
Onslow County
State
Household Type
Count
Percent
Percent
Total
40,658
100.0
100.0
Family Households (families)
32,971
81.1
72.0
Married -couple families
28,037
69.0
56.6
Other family, male
Households
1,091
2.7
3.1
Other family, female
Households
3,843
9.5
12.3
Nonfamily Households
7,687
18.9
28.0
Householder Living
Alone
6,271
15.4
23.7
Householder 65 years and over
1,752
4.3
9.0
Persons Living in Household
115,274
76.9
96.6
Per Households
2.84
—
2.54
Total Population
149,838
100.0
100.0
Group Quarters
Persons Living in Group Quarters
34,564
23.1
3.4
,
Institutionalized Person
954
0.1
Other Persons in Group Quarters
33,610
23.0
2.1
Source: 1991 Onslow County Land Use Plan Update.
b. Onslow County Housing Values and Rent
Table 10 reflects housing values and rent. The following key points have been identified:
-- the median value of owner -occupied units is $62,200 in Onslow County, compared
with $65,800 for the state;
-- most owner -occupied units (60.1 %) in the county are valued between $50,000 and
$99,000;
-- rental fees are higher in Onslow County ($316 median) than in the state ($284
median);
-- the majority of the rental fees (64.7%) are in the $250 to $499 range.
I-17 ,

Table 10
Onslow County and State of North Carolina
Value and Rent, 1990
Value
Specified Owner -Occupied Units
Less than $50,000
$50,000-$99,999
$100,000-$149,999
$150,000-$199,999
$200,000-$299,999
$300,000 or more
Median (dollars)
Contract Rent
Specified Renter -Occupied Units
Less than $250.00
$250-$499
$500-$749
$750-$999
$1000 or more
Median (dollars)
Source: 1991 Onslow County Land Use Plan Update.
Onslow County State
Count Percent Percent
14,774
100.0
100.0
4,103
27.7
31.4
8,912
60.1
47.4
1,220
8.2
12.7
312
2.1
4.6
170
1.1
2.7
57
0.4
1.2
62,200
-
65,800
16,037
100.0
100.0
4,621
28.8
40.6
10,371
64.7
50.9
952
5.9
7.3
87
0.5
0.7
6
0.4
0.5
316
-
284
C. Occupancy and Tenure
Table 11 shows housing occupancy and tenure characteristics for the county and the state.
The following observations can be made:
- out of the county's 40,526 total housing units, 53.7% are owner -occupied,
compared to 68.0% for the state;
-- there are 6,868 vacant housing units in the county, of which 1,912 are for seasonal
use;
-- the average persons per owner -occupied unit is 2.80, compared to 2.62 persons,
statewide;
-- overcrowding within units is greater in Onslow County than in the state. Within the
county, 4.8% of the units have more than one person per room, while the state
average is 2.9%.
1-18

Table 11
Onslow County and State of North Carolina
Occupancy and Tenure, 1980 and 1990
Characteristics
1990
Onslow County
Count Percent
1980
Onslow County
Count Percent
State
Percent
Occupied Housing Units
40,526
100.0
30,307
100.0
100.0
Owner -Occupied
21,658
53.7
16,457
54.3
68.0
Renter -Occupied
18,823
46.3
13,856
45.7
32.0
Vacant Housing Units
6,868
100.0
3,952
100.0
100.0
For seasonal, recreational, or
occasional use
1,912
27.8
32.8
Homeowner vacancy rate
--
3.6
—
--
1.8
Rental vacancy rate
--
2.9
—
—
9.2
Persons per Owner -Occupied Unit
2.80
—
2.88
—
2.62
Persons per Renter -Occupied Unit
2.88
—
2.65
—
2.39
Units with Over 1 Person per Room
1,953
4.8
1,252
4.1
2.9
Source: 1991 Onslow County Land Use Plan Update.
d. Single and Multi -Family Units
Table 12 shows the number of single-family housing units versus multi -family units and the
number of mobile homes in Onslow County. The following key points may be identified in this
table:
-- Onslow County has a lower (51.5%) percentage of single unit detached housing
units than the state (69.0%);
-- Onslow County has a much higher (9.1 %) percentage of condominium or
townhouse units than the state (2.6%).
-- Onslow County has a significantly higher percentage of mobile homes (26.6%)
than found statewide (16.1%).
1-19

Table 12
Onslow County and State of North Carolina
'
Units in Structure and Mobile Home Count, 1990
Onslow County
State
County Percent
Percent
Units in Structure
1-Unit detached
1-Unit attached
24,335 51.2
4,505 9.5
65.2
2.6
2-4 units
2,736 5.8
6.4
5-9 units
1,375 2.9
4.7
10 or more units
2,018 4.2
5.4
Mobile Home, Trailer, Other
12,557 26.4
15.7
Total Units
47,526 100.0
100.0
'
NOTE: Unit attached is an owner -occupied individually -owned condo or townhouse unit.
Source: 1990 U.S. Census.
e. Onslow County Building Permit Activity and Housing Structure Estimates
' Between 1990 and 1993, 1,760 residential building permits in Onslow County were issued
for new construction. At the time this plan update was written, building permit data for the years
1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997 were incomplete. Table 13 provides a summary of residential
building permit activity for the periods in which data are available between 1990-1997.
Table 13
Onslow County
Summary of Residential Building Permit Activity, 1990-1997
Period Number of Permits
Value
1990
325
$14,933,000
1991
556
$12,140,000
1992
404
$16,780,000
1993
475
$21,237,000
'
1994
530
$23,256,000
1995
394
$17,456,800
1996
484
$24,734,600
1997
424
$42,739,335
Total 108 month period
3,592
$173,276,730
'
Source: Onslow County Office of Building Inspector.
During the 108 month period between 1990 and 1997, for which there is available permit data,
there were a total of 3,592 building permits issued for new residential construction. The total value
for permits issued during this period was $173,276,730. Based on this data, the average annual
1 rate of residential permit issuance, between 1990-1996, was 513 permits per year, with an
average value of $48,239 dollars. The following provides a summary of the mobile home permits
' I-20

issued from 1997 to 1992. In 1990, approximately 26% of the county's total housing units were
mobile homes.
Year
Total
1997
1,138
1996
881
1995
1,054
1994
1,034
1993
837
1992 868
Since available building permit data is not broken down by residential permit type (single-family
and multi -family), the number of single and multi -family permits issued since 1990 must be
estimated based on past trends.
In 1990, the total number of housing structures, excluding mobile homes, were divided 82.5%
single-family and 17.5% multi -family.. Based on these percentages and average annual residential
permit issuance between 1990 and 1996, approximately 2,178 single-family structures and 462
multi -family structures have been permitted in Onslow County since 1990. If these figures are
added to the 1990 Census total number of single-family (28,840) and multi -family (6,129)
structures, it yields a December, 1996, total of 31,018 single-family structures and 6,591 multi-
family structures.
4. Summary
The following provides a summary of significant demographic and housing findings:
-- Between 1990-1996, Onslow County's population increased by 0.3% while the total
population for the twenty CAMA-regulated counties increased by 9.2%.
-- In 1995, the population of the county's municipalities amassed 54.0% of the
county's total population, compared to just 18.3% in 1970.
-- During the period 1990-1995, the population growth rate for the City of Jacksonville
far exceeded the growth rates for the remaining Onslow County municipalities.
-- Persons associated with Camp Lejeune total over 126,000, of which approximately
113,000 are Onslow County residents.
-- In Onslow County, persons between 18 and 34 years of age comprised 47% of the '
county's total population in 1995.
-- Between 1990-1995, there has been a slight increase in the number of school
aged children (ages 0-17) and a slight decrease in the younger working population
(ages 18-34).
1-21

'
-- In 1995, approximately 72% of the Onslow County population was white, 22%
black, and the remaining 6% was occupied by other minorities.
-- In 1995, the male:female ratio for Onslow County as a whole was 59% male to
41 % female.
-- In 1990, the average household size in Onslow County was 2.84 persons
compared to the state average of 2.54 persons.
-- The percentage of individuals living in group quarters in Onslow County (23.1 %)
is greater than that of the state (3.4%).
'
-- The median value of owner -occupied units in Onslow County is $62,200, compared
with $65,800 for the state.
'
-- In 1990, 53.7% of the county's total housing units were owner -occupied.
-- In 1990, there were 6,868 vacant housing units in the county of which 27.8% were
for seasonal use.
-- Onslow County has a higher percentage of condominium units and a lower
k
percentage of single unit detached housing units than the state.
-- Onslow County has a significantly higher percentage of mobile homes (26.6%)
than found statewide (16.1%).
-- In December,1996, there were approximately 31,018 single-family and 6,591 multi-
family housing structures in Onslow County.
' D. ECONOMY
1. Introduction
Over the past ten years, the state of Onslow County's economy may be described as poor when
compared to the economies of all of the state's counties. According to the Economic Development
' Yearbook for North Carolina, produced by Problem -Solving Research, Inc., Onslow County
received a rank of 91 out of 100 North Carolina counties in terms of economic growth and
development between the years 1984-1994. The following provides a summary, as stated in the
Economic Development Yearbook, of the methodology used to arrive at the composite rankings
found in Table 14
"The Composite Rankings were created to compare the characteristics of growth between
' the 100 counties in North Carolina. Three rankings are provided. The one year ranking
provides a short term picture of growth. It consists of an overview of the present health of
the county coupled with the county's 1993-1994 economic performance. The five year
ranking provides a mid-term view of economic development. Like the one year ranking, it
assesses the present health of the county but couples the assessment with the county's
1989-1994 economic variation. The ten year index provides a long-term view of growth.
This final measure assesses the present health of the county with the county's 1984-1994
growth and development.
I-22

'
The Composite Ranking of Economic Development is a broadly defined measure of relative
economic well-being. Its construction has two major parts. First, it is composed of four
measures that describe the economic health of an area at a particular point in time. Each
of these components provides a unique gauge of the county's most recent annual economic
,
health. Second, the ranking is composed of five measures of economic change. Thus, the
Composite Ranking considers the present well-being of the county and how the local
economy has improved from one point to the next.
The nine components of the Composite Ranking are arranged according to five general
areas:
,
ABILITY TO CREATE JOBS
e Change in Employment measures the area's ability to create jobs.
ABILITY TO EARN AN ADEQUATE INCOME
e Per Capita Income measures the level of income from the wages & salaries and
other forms of income generating activity (such as investments and owner profit).
e Change in Per Capita Income demonstrates the increase in income between
,
two points in time. Although this measure is correlated with the growth in jobs, a
pace of change in per capita income that lags the pace of job growth implies that
the area is adding lower paying jobs.
ABILITY TO KEEP THE LOCAL LABOR FORCE EMPLOYED
e Unemployment Rate measures the percentage of the population that is willing
to work but is unable to obtain employment.
'
e Change in the Unemployment Rate measures the improvement in an
individual's ability to find work from one period to the next.
ABILITY TO ATTRACT INCOME FROM OTHER REGIONS
e Per Capita Retail Sales measures the ability of an area to attract persons to a
county to shop and play, thereby demonstrating the regional importance of a local
area.
e Change in Per Capita Retail Sales measures how the relative attractiveness
of an area for shopping and play has changed over time.
ABILITY TO REDUCE POVERTY
e Per Capita Food Stamp Recipients serves as a proxy for a poverty index. It
shows the relative number of persons that are unable to adequately support
themselves or their families.
e Change in Per Capita Food Stamp Recipients shows how the level of poverty
has changed over time.
,
The Composite Rankings are created by assigning equal weights to the nine components
of development. First, the measure's nine components are computed for each county in
North Carolina. Second, within each component the counties are ranked from most positive
to most negative and assigned a ranking from 1 to 100. The average of the nine rankings
is tabulated and ranked from top to bottom. The Composite Ranking is this final result."
The composite rankings for the twenty CAMA regulated counties, as found in the Economic '
Development Yearbook, have been included in Table 14.
I-23 '

. I
L�
Table 14
CAMA Regulated Counties
One, Five, and Ten -Year Composite Rankings of Economic Development
One -Year
1993-1994
Five -Year Ten -Year
1989-1994 1984-1994
State
CAMA
State
CAMA
Rank
Rank
Rank
Rank
Beaufort
90
16
89
15
Bertie
100
20
96
20
Brunswick
76
13
68
8
Camden
82
15
71
10
Carteret
56
7
35
2
Chowan
70
11
82
14
Craven
62
8
57
6
Currituck
19
2
43
4
Dare
39
4
42
3
Gates
95
19
58
7
Hertford
52
6
91
18
Hyde
26
3
76
11
New Hanover
17
1
30
1
Onslow
67
9
69
9
Pamlico
92
18
77
12
Pasquotank
71
12
90
17
Pender
91
17
92
19
Perquimans
49
5
78
13
Tyrrell
68
10
49
5
Washington
77
14
88
16
State
CAMA
Rank
Rank
94
17
100
20
75
9
83
13
58
5
89
15
76
10
47
4
10
1
79
11
99
19
44
3
30
2
91
16
62
6
98
18
69
7
80
12
70
8
85
14
Note: State rank out of 100 total counties and CAMA rank out of 20 total counties.
Source: Economic Development Yearbook for North Carolina, 1995.
The status of Onslow County's economy fares much more favorably for the One -Year (1993-1994)
' and Five -Year (1989-1994) periods than for the Ten -Year period (1984-1994). This indicates that
economic conditions in the county have been improving over the past 5-7 years.
' The following provides a summary of positive and negative factors which influence the county's
economy:
' Positive
Strong support for tourism.
-- Prosperous retail trade sector (also has negative implications).
Fiscally sound local government.
Desirable real estate.
-- Advanced transportation network including highway, air, and rail service.
' - Strong industrial recruitment.
Continued growth in the service sector (also has negative implications).
1 1-24

Negative
-- Extremely low wage rates. According to the N.C. Department of Commerce, in
1994 Onslow County ranked 88th out of 100 North Carolina counties in insured '
wages.
-- Low wage rates and minimal benefits in the trade and services sectors of
employment. In Onslow County, these sectors combined make up 47.4% of the '
county's total insured employment.
-- Uncertainty of government jobs, primarily those provided by the Camp Lejeune
Marine Corps Base.
-- Limited industrial parks.
-- Stagnant population growth.
2. General Economic Indicators
Table 15 below provides a summary of economic indicators in Onslow County and the state of
North Carolina for 1990 and 1995. During this five year period, Onslow County's per capita ,
income, aggregate household income, and gross retail sales all grew at rates higher than those
experienced by the state as a whole. The county trailed the state in median household income
and total employed labor force growth.
Table 15
Onslow County ,
Summary of Economic Indicators, 1990 and 1995
Onslow County
%
North Carolina
%
'
�90-'95
Indicator
1990 1995
1990
1995
'90change
95
Per Capita
'
Income $
10,713 18,468
72.4%
12,885
17,447
35.4%
Aggregate
Household
Income
1,133,338 2,107,570
86.0%
83,674,186
121,008,095
44.6%
Median
-
Household
Income
23,451 27,038
15.5%
26,646
33,634
26.2%
'
Gross Retail
Sales (Million$)
679.84 829.67
22.0%
40,171.95
42,729.77
6.4%
Total Employed
,
Labor Force
38,674 32,825(1)
-15.1%
3,238,414
4,038,550(2)
24.7%
Sources: PCensus:
EQUIFAX National Decision Systems WEFA.
,
(1) Onslow County Economic Development Commission; (2) Woods and Poole Economics, Inc.
The Onslow County employed labor force decreased by approximately -15% between 1990 and '
1995. Although a portion of this decline is due to the slight decrease that occurred during this
period in the county's total population, it is due mainly to the fact that Onslow County's civilian
population is aging. As a result, more people are retiring and exiting the employed labor force,
than reaching the working age and entering the employed labor force.
I-25

r
Between 1992 and 1995, the unemployment rate steadily decreased, ranging from a high of 5.1 %
in 1992 to a low of 4.0% in 1995. Table 16 provides unemployment rates for Onslow County and
the state as a whole for the years 1992-1995.
Table 16
' Onslow County
County and State Unemployment Rates, 1992-1995
1992 1993 1994 1995
Onslow County 5.1 % 4.8% 4.5% 4.0%
North Carolina 5.9% 4.9% 4.4% 4.3%
Source: The Economic Development Yearbook for North Carolina, 1995; and the NC State Data Center.
' During fiscal year 1995-1996, Onslow County's gross retail sales exceeded $900 billion dollars
comprising 0.93% of North Carolina's total gross retail sales. Table 17 shows the change in gross
retail sales by major business group between fiscal years 1989-90 and 1995-96.
Table 17
' Onslow County
Gross Retail Sales, FY89-90 and FY95-96
'
Maior Business Group
FY 89-90
FY 95-96
Change (%)
1% Sales Group[1]
$ 1,785,854
$ 3,804,601
113.0%
2% Sales Group[2]
47,022,574
14,141,025
-69.9%
3% Sales Group [3]
N/A
4,105,748
N/A
Apparel
20,012,052
20,444,768
2.2%
Automotive
Food
81,853,468
194,905,897
160,288,878
261,411,686
95.8%
34.1%
Furniture
41,737,991
67,721,977
62.3%
General Merchandise
147,101,103
210,485,138
43.1 %
Lumber, Building Material
46,340,823
77,988,145
68.3%
Unclassified[4]
Total
59,916,379
86,225,543
43.9%
41.5%
$640,676,141
$906,617,509
Notes:
[1] Farm, mill, laundry machinery; fuel to farmers, manufacturers, laundries, others.
[2] Manufactured homes.
' [3] Airplanes, boats, etc.
[4] Miscellaneous retail and services.
Sources: 1991 Onslow County Land Use Plan Update and NC Department of Revenue, "State Sales and
' Use Statistics for Fiscal Year 1995-1996".
1-26

Between fiscal years 1989-90 and 1995-96, the business groups which experienced the largest '
growth in gross retail sales were 1 % Sales (113.0%), automotive (95.8%), and lumber, building
material (68.3%). Total county gross retail sales increased by 41.5%. '
3. Employment and Income
Table 18 provides a summary of Onslow County's insured employment by sector. It should be i
noted that these totals include only civilian jobs and do not include military personnel.
Table 18 '
Onslow County Wage and Salary Employment by Sector
Employed Persons 16 Years and Over, First Quarter, 1995 '
Sector Avg. Employment Percentage
Manufacturing
2,166
6.6
,
Construction
1,955
6.0
Transportation/Utilities
1,291
3.9
Wholesale Trade
678
2.1
Retail Trade
9,551
29.1
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate
1,154
3.5
'
Government
10,487
31.9
Services
5,327
16.2
AG/Forestry/Fish
216
0.7
,
Total Employment
32,825
100.0
Source: Onslow County Economic Development Commission.
Table 18 shows that the largest single employment sector in 1995 was government, which made
up 31.9% of all those employed 16 years of age or older. Retail trade employment accounted for
the second largest sector with 29.1 %. The services sector which includes health services,
educational services, and other professional services combined provided employment for 16.2%
of those employed who are 16 years of age or older. It is important to note that Table 18 includes
only insured employment. Much of the employment and agricultural occupations are not reported
and not reflected in this total. '
Camp Lejeune and the Marine Corps Air Station at New River combined is the leading employer
of Onslow County residents. In 1996, approximately 4,000 civilian and 42,000 military personnel, '
most of whom resided in Onslow County, worked at Camp Lejeune.
Camp Lejeune's largest contribution to the local economy is from wages and salaries paid to its ,
civilian and military personnel. In FY95 gross pay for military personnel and civilian employees
to include NAF organizations such as the Marine Corps Exchange, totaled $991 million. An
additional $387.5 million was paid to federal retirees living within 50 miles of Camp Lejeune.
Military salary figures include basic pay, allowances for subsistence, housing, clothing, hazardous '
duty pay, and sea duty pay.
JI
1-27 1

7
LI
Table 19 provides a summary of Camp Lejeune's direct and indirect economic impact.
Table 19
Onslow County
Camp Lejeune and Marine Corps Air Station at New River
Direct and Indirect Economic Impact, 1995
Annual Payroll
$1,378,929,065
Material, Supplies, and Svcs.
357,144,897
Construction
102,700,000
Health Care
74,900,000
Contributions
4,273,000
Other
116,800,000
Total Direct and Indirect Impact
$2,034,747,542
Source: Onslow County Economic Development Commission.
The general economic indicator previously discussed in Table 19, combined with a decreasing
unemployment rate indicate that the county's economy has been improving since 1990. This
substantiates the composite rankings shown in Table 14 which indicated higher economic
development rankings for the period 1989-1994 than for the period 1984-1994.
Although economic conditions in Onslow County have improved slightly over the past few years,
average weekly wage rates for county residents remain low. In 1992 and 1994, Onslow County
ranked 88th out of 100 North Carolina counties in terms of average wages. In 1994, the county
had an average weekly wage rate of $314 dollars compared to the state average of $451 dollars.
In 1995, the county's wage rate was slightly higher at $348 dollars. These low wage rates are due
largely to a high percentage of jobs concentrated in the retail trade industry, coupled with a lack
of higher wage manufacturing jobs.
The county has recognized the need for additional industrial areas to increase the number of
higher wage jobs and to help curb economic reliance on military employment.
Most of Onslow County's labor force has succeeded in securing work locally. In 1990, 71 % of the
county's workers traveled less than 25 minutes to work. Table 20 provides a summary of travel
time to work.

Table 20
Onslow County
Travel Time to Work, Workers 16 Years and Over, 1990
Did not work at home:
Less than 5 minutes
6,135
5 to 9 minutes
12,901
10 to 14 minutes
13,375
15 to 19 minutes
14,874
20 to 24 minutes
13,172
25 to 29 minutes
4,891
30 to 34 minutes
11,281
35 to 39 minutes
1,652
40 to 44 minutes
1,490
45 to 59 minutes
3,262
60 to 89 minutes
1,710
90 or more minutes
703
Worked at home
1,355
Total
86,801
Source: 1990 U.S. Census.
Only 29% of the population had to travel longer than 24 minutes to their place of employment.
These relatively low travel times indicate that many county residents have secured employment
within Onslow County.
In 1995, approximately 47.8% of the county's households had incomes less than $25,000,
compared to 39.7% for the state as a whole. Table 21 shows the 1995 household income levels
and food stamp recipients for Onslow County and all of North Carolina.
Table 21
Onslow County
Household Income
Onslow County
All of North Carolina
% of
% of
1995 Household Income
Population Population
Population
Population
Total Households
40,577
2,781,291
$0 to $15,000
8,326
21.0%
631,667
23.0%
$15,000 to $25,000
11,060
27.0%
472,120
17.0%
$25,000 to $35,000
8,059
20.0%
426,279
15.0%
$35,000 to $50,000
6,443
16.0%
489,436
18.0%
$50,000 to $75,000
4,485
11.0%
447,878
16.0%
$75,000 to $100,000
1,172
3.0%
144,764
5.0%
$100,000 to $150,000
446
1.0%
92,706
3.0%
$150,000 and over
586
1.0%
76,441
3.0%
Food Stamp Recipients`*
1992
6.8%
8.9%
1993
7.5%
9.1 % ,
1994
7.8%
8.9%
Source: "PCensus EQUIFAX National Decision Systems WEFA Group, 1995 Update; "Economic '
Development Yearbook for North Carolina, 1995.
-29 '

The $15,000 to $25,000 income bracket contained the largest percentage of households for
Onslow County, while the $0 to $15,000 income bracket contained the largest percentage of
households for the state. Approximately 32% of the county's households made over $35,000 in
1995.
' The number of food stamp recipients provides the best indicator for the number of Onslow County
residents below the poverty level. It should be noted that some people who may be considered
below the poverty level choose not to apply for food stamps. Therefore, the actual number of
people below the poverty level would be slightly higher than the number of people on food stamps.
Between 1992-1994, the percentage of people receiving food stamps in Onslow County was less
' than that of the state as a whole. However, between 1992 and 1994, the percentage of food
stamp recipients in the county increased from 6.8% to 7.8%. This indicates that the approximate
number of people at or below the poverty level in Onslow County was less than the state average
between 1992-1994, but the number of people below the poverty level in the county showed
increases during the three year period.
4. Education
In 1990, Onslow County ranked ahead of the state as a whole in terms of high school degrees,
some college, no degree, and number of associate degrees. The county trailed the state in the
number of Bachelor's degrees and graduate or professional degrees. Table 22 provides a
summary of 1990 county and state educational attainment.
'
Table 22
Onslow County and the State of North
Carolina
Educational Attainment, 1990
Onslow County
North Carolina
Educational Attainment
Total %
Total %
Less than 9th Grade
4,312 5.9
539,974 12.7
9th to 12th Grade, no diploma
8,038 11.1
737,773 17.3
High School Graduate (includes
'
equivalency)
26,830 36.8
1,232,868 29.0
Some college, no degree
18,789 25.8
713,713 16.8
'
Associate degree
5,079 7.0
290,117 6.8
Bachelor's degree
7,156 9.8
510,003 12.0
Graduate or professional degree
2,620 3.6
229,046 5.4
Total
72,824 100.0
4,253,494 100.0
Source: 1990 U.S. Census.
5. Travel and Tourism
In Onslow County, travel expenditures are an important component
of the local retail and services
industries, amounting to just under 82 million dollars in 1994.
These expenditures include the
1-30

sectors of retail (eating, drinking, and miscellaneous), lodging, transportation, entertainment, and
recreation. Table 23 shows travel expenditures made in Onslow County between 1989 and 1994.
Table 23
Onslow County
Travel and Tourism Expenditure Impact Estimates for 1989 through 1994
Year
Onslow County (Millions)
1989
$65.02
1990
$68.32
1991
$74.89
1992
$73.13
1993
$78.16
1994
$81.92
% Change 1989-1994
26.0%
Source: N.C. Department of Travel and Tourism.
Between 1989-1994, travel and tourism expenditures in Onslow County increased by 26.0%, or
5.2% annually.
Domestic tourism generated an economic impact of $87.2 million in Onslow County in 1995. This
is a 5.9% increase over 1994 and compares with a North Carolina average of 8.1 % and a national
average of 5.1%. Onslow County is ranked 21st in tourism impact among 100 North Carolina
counties. Approximately 1,370 jobs in Onslow County are directly attributable to travel and
tourism, and an additional 1,918 are related to this sector. In 1995, travel generated a $20.34
million payroll in Onslow County.
6. Commercial Fishing
The harvesting of finfish and shellfish has historically been a strong component of the county's
heritage and economy, and remains true today. Between 1990-1995, the total number of pounds
of finfish and shellfish landings ranged from 4,166,198 pounds in 1990 to 2,722,744 pounds in
1992. Consequently, the greatest dockside value of landings was in 1990, while the lowest value
was in 1992.
Table 24 provides a summary of commercial finfish and shellfish landings for Onslow County
between 1990 and 1995.
Table 24
Onslow County
Finfish and Shellfish Landings
Year Type
Pounds
Value
1990 Finfish
2,484,095
$1,548,065
Shellfish
1,682,103
$3,057,566
1991 Finfish
2,328,725
$1,349,766
Shellfish
1,738,531
$2,867,238
iI
F,
1
1
1-31

P
1
11
Table 24 (continued)
Year Type Pounds Value
1992 Finfish
1,682,499
$1,034,975
Shellfish
1,040,245
$1,774,302
1993 Finfish
1,980,133
$1,308,924
Shellfish
1,526,172
$3,079,154
1994 Finfish
1,291,098
$1,041,269
Shellfish
1,715,649
$3,490,872
1995 Finfish 1,502,733
$1,297,492
Shellfish 1,918,833
$4,234,924
Total Finfish 11,269,283
$7,580,491
Shellfish 9,621,533
$18,504,056
Source: North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries.
According to the Onslow County Economic Development Commission, in 1995, there were 215
Onslow County residents employed in the agriculture, forestry, and fisheries occupations
combined, out of a total civilian workforce of 32,825 and total county population of 147,912. This
represents approximately 0.7% of the county's total workforce. The U.S. Census did not attempt
to separate commercial fishing employment from the agricultural and forestry occupations. In
addition, the figure provided above does not take into consideration persons employed on -shore
in fishing -related activities. The actual number of people employed by commercial fishing was
much higher than the census data indicated.
During 1997, approximately 1,300 commercial fishing licenses where issued by the Division of
Marine Fisheries to residents of Onslow County. However, many of these Onslow County
residents may actually conduct their fishing activities outside of Onslow County. In other words,
an individual with a commercial fishing license who resides in Onslow County may choose to fish
in Carteret County and vice versa.
7. Manufacturing
In 1995, 2,166 persons were employed in manufacturing jobs in the county, representing 6.6%
of the total county employment (excluding active duty military personnel). This is significantly less
than in 1990 when 3,101 persons were employed in manufacturing, comprising 10.3% of the
county's total employment. As previously mentioned, the county's wage rates remain low due to
the lack of higher paying manufacturing jobs. Onslow County has recognized the need to expose
its industrial areas to increase the number of manufacturing jobs. This will help increase county
wage rates and help curb the economic reliance on Camp Lejeune employment. The construction
of an industrial park in the county will be an issue addressed during the planning period.
Table 25 provides a listing of major manufacturing employers in Onslow County.
1-32

Table 25
Onslow County
Major Manufacturing Employers
# of
Facility Name
Employees
Location
Product
Advanced Machining
14
Holly Ridge
Industrial machinery & equip.
Holly Ridge Foods, Inc.
100
Holly Ridge
Frozen turnovers
Thorn Apple Valley of NC
500
Holly Ridge
Bacon
Truss Builders of Holly Ridge
10
Holly Ridge
Wooden floor & roof trusses
Burrus Construction Co.
65
Jacksonville
Asphalt
Coastal Equipment Co.
38
Jacksonville
Industrial equipment
Distributors
Edge -a -Lawn
2
Jacksonville
Lawn edging equipment
Fiberglass International
8
Jacksonville
Insulation/refrigeration equip.
Gilbralter Publishing
215
Jacksonville
Miscellaneous publishing
Jacksonville Daily News
130
Jacksonville
Newspaper publishing & printing
Jasper Textiles (Outer Banks
175
Jacksonville
Knit apparel
Sportswear)
MSA Co/Mine Safety Appliance
180
Jacksonville
Respirator facepieces, aerosol
filters, faceshield visors, goggles,
& first aid kits
Progressive Service Die Co.
34
Jacksonville
Cutting dies
Ravens Metal Products, Inc.
79
Jacksonville
Aluminum flat bed & drop deck
trailers & bodies
Specialty Mode, Inc.
59
Jacksonville
Ladies' sportswear and
activewear
Stanadyne Automotive Corp.
400
Jacksonville
Diesel fuel injection pumps &
nozzles
New River Nets
4
Sneads Ferry
Fish nets, shrimp trawls & doors
Jansen Manufacturing
5
Swansboro
Furniture/cabinets
National Marble Products
10
Swansboro
Marble tile
Quality Cable and Assembly
40
Swansboro
IBM cable components
Tiara Yachts
200*
Swansboro
Pleasure boats
*Tiara Yachts is expected to employ approximately 50 employees during its first year of operation and will
expand to 200 employees within three years.
Source: Onslow County Office of Economic Development and Jacksonville Chamber of Commerce.
8. Agriculture
Although the agriculture, forestry, and fishing industries combined made only 0.7% of the insured
employment for Onslow County in 1995, agriculture still provides a significant economic contributor
to the county. Table 26 shows a total farm income of over $72 million dollars for 1995. This
amount was 13.4% less than experienced in 1993.
1-33

i♦M IIIIIIIIIIIIIIN M M M M M
Table 26
Onslow County
Estimated Income from Sale of Farm Products and Government Payments
Commodity
1993
1994 (Revised)
1995
Tobacco - Flue -cured
$11,746,633
$10,792,737
$9,528,694
Cotton
$931,328
$1,692,731
$2,908,722
Peanuts
$0*
$0*
$0*
Corn
$2,919,800
$3,364,000
$4,940,000
Soybeans
$2,713,212
$2,782,000
2,714,500
Other Grains
$481,470
$688,376
$723,900
Potatoes
$541,125
$438,750
$319,250
Fruits & Vegetables
$1,293,513
$1,676,205
$1,590,580
Greenhouse & Nursery
$1,352,000
$2,102,000
$2,137,000
Hay & Other Crops
$151,590
$161,820
$304,000
Farm Forestry
$14,308,046
$15,913,351
$5,870,671**
Total Crop Income
$36,438,717
$39,611,970
$31,037,317
Hogs
$26,011,817
$18,013,893
$18,997,686
Cattle
$292,189
$173,760
$244,975
Milk
$244,072
$0
$0
Poultry & Eggs
$20,509,775
$23,819,884
$22,066,067
Other Livestock & LS/Prod Income
$16,589
$16,874
$16,466
Total Livestock & LS/Prod Income
$47,074,442
$42,024,411
$41,325,194
Total Farm Income
$83,513,159
$81,636,381
$72,362,511
Government Payments
$481,891
$331,043
$308,944
Total Farm Income & Gov. Payments
$83,995,050
$81,967,424
$72,671,455
Fee Fishing (Trout & Catfish)
$0*
$0*
$0*
Seafood
$4,386,341
$5,759,072
$5,530,135
Non -Farm Forestry
$13,225,614
$13,331,842
$9,824,726
Horses, Ponies, Mules
$813,800
$713,500
$744,350
*Counties may not show sales to avoid individual disclosures; **Farm Forestry - includes only non -industrial private landownership; ***Non -Farm
Forestry - includes public lands as well as forest industry ownership.
Source: NC Cooperative Extension Service.
1-34

Between 1993 and 1995, the county's crop production income decreased -14.8% from an annual
total of $36.4 million to $31.0 million. The county's total livestock income also decreased from
$47.1 million in 1993 to $41.3 million in 1995.
The largest 1995 income producing commodities were: 1) poultry and eggs, 2) hogs, 3) tobacco -
flue -cured, and 4) farm forestry. It is also significant that cotton is becoming an increasingly
significant crop in Onslow County. Between 1993 and 1995, the estimated income from the sale
of cotton in the county increased 212%.
9. Forestry
Commercial forestry plays a significant part in the county's economy. Commercial forests owned
by Weyerhaeuser, International Paper, etc., occupy approximately 93,000 acres in the county.
In addition, Hofmann Forest which is located in the north central port of Onslow County and
southern Jones County occupies approximately 80,000 acres. This forest is owned and managed
by the North Carolina State University Board of Endowment and utilized as a silvaculture research
station.
One major component of the county's forestry economy, the Weyerhaeuser Company plywood
division, located just north of Jacksonville on Highway 17 North, ceased operations in November,
1990.
Camp Lejeune has the largest forest management program in the Marine Corps. Commercial
timber sales harvested by private timber contractors, generated $1,231,495 in FY 1995. After
deducting forest management expenses, a total of $57,724 was returned to the Onslow County
Board of Education for use in public schools. This year's check brings the ten year total donations
given to Onslow County schools to over $1 million.
10. Summary
I
The following provides a summary of the most significant economic trends in Onslow County: I
-- In 1993/1994, Onslow County had a composite economic ranking of ninth out of the 20
CAMA regulated counties.
-- The state of Onslow County's economy may be described as below average compared to
the economies of all of the state's counties.
-- The total civilian employed labor force decreased from 38,674 in 1990 to 32,825 in 1995.
-- Between 1992 and 1995, the county's unemployment rate has steadily decreased.
-- Between fiscal years 1989-1990 and 1995-1996, Onslow County's gross retail sales
increased from $640.7 million to $906.7 million.
-- Government constitutes the county's largest single employment category followed by retail
trade and services.
-- Camp Lejeune is the leading employer of Onslow County residents.
1-35

-- In 1994, Onslow County ranked 88th out of 100 North Carolina counties in terms of
average wages.
-- In 1990, only 29% of the county's population had to travel longer than 24 minutes to their
place of employment.
' -- In 1995, approximately 48% of the county's households had incomes less than $25,000,
compared to 40% for the state.
' -- Between 1992-1994, the percentage of people receiving food stamps in Onslow County
was less than that of the state as a whole.
' -- In 1990, approximately 83% of persons greater than 25 years of age held high school
degrees.
' -- In 1994, county travel expenditures totaled just under $82 million dollars.
-- Onslow County is ranked 21st in tourism impact among 100 North Carolina counties.
-- In 1995, 3.4 million pounds of finfish and shellfish combined were landed in Onslow
County with a dockside value of over $5.5 million dollars.
-- In 1995, only 6.6% of the county's employed civilians worked in manufacturing compared
to 10.3% in 1990.
-- The largest 1995 income producing commodities were: 1) poultry and eggs, 2) hogs,
3) tobacco - flue -cured, and 4) farm forestry.
1
E. EXISTING LAND USE
1. General Land Use Summary
' Onslow County has full planning and regulatory authority over approximately 58 percent of the
land within the county's 767 square miles. When the planning jurisdictions of the county's six
municipalities and the three government -owned facilities (Camp Lejeune, Hofmann Forest,
' Hammock Beach State Park) are subtracted, the county is left with 448.1 square miles of
regulatory jurisdiction. The county does not have zoning or other regulatory authority over Camp
Lejeune, Hofmann Forest, and the State Park.
Table 27 provides a generalized acreage estimate of Onslow County's municipalities and
regulatory jurisdiction.
' I-36

Table 27
Onslow County
Acreage Estimates of Municipalities and Regulatory Jurisdiction
Total Onslow County (Land Area)
Exclusions
City of Jacksonville (Base included)
Town of Swansboro
Town of Richlands
Town of Holly Ridge
Town of Surf City (Onslow County part)
Town of North Topsail Beach
Net Planning Jurisdiction
Major Components of Planning Jurisdiction
Camp Lejeune (minus City annex.)
Hofmann Forest
Hammock Beach State Park
Full Regulatory Jurisdiction
Acres Square Miles
490,940 767.1 '
40,770
63.7
2,670
4.2
3,920
6.1
3,120
4.9
390
0.6
7,390
11.5
432,680
676.1
90,600
141.6
54,310
84.9
930
1.5
286,840
448.1
Sources: NC Office of State Planning,1991 Onslow County Land Use Plan Update, and Holland Consulting
Planners, Inc.
It is difficult to provide detailed statistics or the land areas committed to particular land uses in a
county which is primarily rural. The overall pattern of land use is far more important. Table 28
provides a generalized estimate of land usage within Onslow County's area of full regulatory
jurisdiction.
Table 28
Onslow County
Generalized Existing Land Use Estimate, 1997
Acres
Square Miles
% of Total
Residential
16,050
25.1
5.6%
Non-residential
8,520
13.3
3.0%
Total Developed
24,570
38.4
8.6%
Agriculture (cleared)
48,680
76.1
17.0%
Forested
203,960
318.6
71.1 %
Water Bodies
9,630
15.0
3.3%
Total Developed
262,270
409.7
91.4%
Total Regulatory Jurisdiction*
286,840
448.1
100.0%
Prime Farmland**
123,340
192.7
43.0%
Wetlands**
133,780
209.0
46.6%
*Onslow County's regulatory jurisdiction does not include incorporated areas, Camp Lejeune, Hofmann
Forest, and Hammock Beach State Park; **Not included in total.
Sources: 1991 Onslow County Land Use Plan Update, Soil Conservation Service, and Holland Consulting
Planners, Inc.
1-37

Table 28 indicates that approximately 262,270 acres of Onslow County's regulatory jurisdiction
remains undeveloped. However, approximately 46.6% of this acreage may be considered
wetlands. This leaves a balance of approximately 122,218 acres of suitable land available for
future development. Developed acreage occupies 8.6% of the county's regulatory jurisdiction and
consists of approximately 16,050 residential acres and 8,520 non-residential acres. Non-
residential acreage includes the various industrial and commercial businesses that are scattered
throughout the county.
Map 2 provides a general indication of existing land use within Onslow County. This map shows
the location of federal and state land, residential concentrations, prime farmland areas, marinas,
and public facilities. Since all concentrations of existing commercial and industrial developed
' acreage are located within incorporated areas, and not under the regulatory authority of the
county, they have not been shown on the existing land use map.
2. Onslow County "Communities"
Most existing land uses within the county relate directly to the following three factors:
' _ Camp Lejeune
Coastal Environment
-- Agriculture and Forestry Operations
These formative factors created three primary "communities" within the county including the
following:
-- Jacksonville Urban Area/Camp Lejeune Community;
— Traditional Rural Community/Commercial and Educational Forestry; and the
-- Coastal Community.
These communities are depicted on Map 3.
a. Jacksonville Urban Area/Camp Lejeune Community
This community contains Camp Lejeune, New River Air Station, City of Jacksonville, and
an urbanized crescent of housing and commercial development. This community overlaps the
portions of Jacksonville, Swansboro, White Oak, and Stump Sound Townships.
b. Traditional Rural Community
This community is typical of many such rural areas in eastern North Carolina. Traditional
' rural standards and values remain predominant. Agriculture and forestry operations and low
density residential/commercial development characterize this community. Richlands, a town with
1,268 persons is a commercial center for this community. This community includes all of
Richlands Township, and portions of Stump Sound, Jacksonville, and White Oak Townships. In
reality, this community does not stop at the county line, rather it extends into Pender, Duplin, and
Jones Counties.
7
1
1-38

0
•
•
f
���� .•Zo
. ••./WWI .-,y,PJr/�IM.�' .1NM.'4 M
++.�+1❖11♦•♦ •1.1 • ♦ •♦
♦ .. :c ♦ 1 '.. • t -�+ •►'`,, vow" i,1661
' � ' , •i;•.•'' A.V. �►/VNI. �i4
Yr
Y
+ •
f�. .+
1� -
�fl• �M. ��/Mr MM/Ny.� yI•NIV
,. •VW4VY•/V�•�a`-"-"'/•IM.'IMN Mom------ -
roe--
O
LEGEND c0 -- ---
CORPORATE LIMITS \
MUNICIPAL EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION \ ?�
FEDERAL LAND
STATE LAND
RESIDENTIAL ' 'S"
i r" ,t r S r.,
PRIME FARMLAND
MARINAS •
SCHOOL BUILDINGS
FIRE/RESCUE STATIONS .
PUBLIC PARKS
WATERSHED BOUNDARY LINES*
'.%f•° iUw Greater Sandv Run
co
0
PENpER COUNTY
Bay
r .11544.1
1815454
LO� V NX
�1T
V RIDGE
SURF
N�
MAP 2
EXISTING LAND USE
ONSLOW COUNTY 1-39
miles
SCALE

0
•� �..... '�.: 434'
r
The preparation of this map was financed in •I' '� 1796 �t
part through a grant provided by the North 0. J t4 9 1437
Carolina Coastal Management Program, �• 436 434
through funds provided by the Coastal Zone
Management Act of 1972, as amended, which i 142 435
is administered by the Office of Ocean and 1 J33 133
Coastal Resource Management, National 143e
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 1 33 142
�1
,i 2
j= 4:
01 142
CORPORATELEGEND
"
MUNICIPAL EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION
ONSLOW COUNTY "COMMUNITIES"
CARTERET ,
i•�...•�'.'�'S'�!�.ltih.ta COUIVT
,.y,._._—•-._.,Oaf Y
i•
River
�y
.z
Q
Uj
C..)
O
MAP 3
ONSLOW COUNTY
miles
o i z �J 1-40
SCALE

II
' C. Coastal Community
This community consists of two separate areas -- the land east of Highway U.S. 17
including North Topsail Beach and Sneads Ferry, and the Swansboro area. This community is
oriented primary to the estuarine and ocean environment. The Townships involved include the
' southeastern portions of Stump Sound and Swansboro Townships. This community continues
into Pender and Carteret Counties.
In addition to the three primary formative factors previously discussed, several other secondary
factors influence land use patterns in Onslow County. A few of these factors include the following:
-- Major highway corridors (U.S. 17 and 258, NC 24);
i-- Wetlands;
-- Soil characteristics;
-- Land uses surrounding the county;
-- Water and wastewater services;
-- Governmental regulations and policies.
These factors have been discussed in detail throughout this Land Use Plan Update.
3. Residential Land Use
' Since 1991, substantial residential development has occurred. From 1992 to 1997, a total of 170
subdivisions containing 2,389 residential lots were approved for development by the Onslow
County Planning Board. During this period, the majority of the development was concentrated in
the Swansboro Township. This township alone included 47.47% of the total number of lots
subdivided between 1992-1997. Table 29 includes a summary of Onslow County subdivision
activity by township between 1992-1997.
Table 29
' Onslow County
Subdivision Activity by Township, 1992-1997
Township *Total Subdivisions % of Total Total Lots % of Total
Jacksonville 31 18.23% 391 16.37%
Stump Sound 36 21.18% 410 17.17%
Swansboro 66 38.82% 1,134 47.47%
Richlands 20 11.77% 203 8.50%
White Oak 17 10.00% 251 10.50%
Total 170 100.00% 2,389 100.00%
* The total provided here includes new subdivisions and the expansion of existing subdivisions.
' Source: Onslow County Planning Department.
' Between the five-year period, 1992-1997, the largest number of approved subdivisions occurred
in 1997. During 1997, 39 subdivisions were approved containing 568 lots.
1-41

Table 30 indicates that six out of the ten largest subdivisions, approved between 1992-1997, were
located in the Swansboro Township.
Table 30
Onslow County
Ten Largest Subdivisions Approved Between 1992-1997
Subdivisions*
Lots
Township
Foxtrace
400
Swansboro
Horse Creek Farm
198
White Oak
South Creek
185
Stump Sound
Raintree
102
Jacksonville
Hickory Bluffs
87
Swansboro
White Oak
81
Swansboro
Hall's Creek at the Hammocks
79
Swansboro
Timber Ridge
63
Swansboro
Swansbluff
62
Swansboro
Gateway
57
Jacksonville
"This is only subdivision lots approved by the Onslow County Planning Board between 1992-1997, it does
not reflect any lots approved prior to 1992.
Source: Onslow County Planning Department.
It is not unusual that the greatest development pressures have occurred in the Swansboro
Township. This township contains some of the county's water resources which provide aesthetic
and recreational advantages for development. Residential development is expected to be the
greatest in this area throughout the planning period.
Onslow County does not have a county -wide zoning ordinance to regulate the location of land
uses. There is a zoning ordinance affecting the Golden Acres area located in the Stump Sound
Township. However, this area occupies less than 1 % of the county's total area of full regulatory
jurisdiction and does not regulate other areas of the county experiencing intense development
pressures. Onslow County Planning Department staff view the lack of county -wide zoning as the
most critical land use issue facing the county.
4. Commercial and Industrial Land Use
Commercial and industrial land uses occupy approximately 8,520 acres or 3.0% of the county's
total area of regulatory jurisdiction. It has been estimated that over 70% of the total commercial
and industrial acreage is developed for commercial use. It should be noted that the above
acreage estimate figure includes approximately 700 acres developed for the Albert Ellis Airport.
There are no concentrations of commercial or industrial businesses within the area of county
jurisdiction. All concentrations of existing commercial and industrial development are located
within incorporated areas. The county's commercial center, and only industrial park are located
within the City of Jacksonville's planning jurisdiction.
Commercial concentrations in Jacksonville exist in the "strip development" fashion along Lejeune,
Marine, and Western Boulevards. The city's existing land use plan includes as an important land
use concern, the need to control this type of development.
am

' The Jacksonville industrial park is located along White and Center Streets, generally between Bell
Fork Road and Country Club Road. To serve as a tax incentive for industries, this area has not
been incorporated into Jacksonville's city limits. However, it does lie within the city's planning
jurisdiction and is not under the regulatory control of the county. Onslow County has recognized
the need for an industrial park and is currently investigating potential sites.
5. Institutional Land Uses
Institutional land uses normally include government land uses, churches, cemeteries, civic uses,
clubs, and health services. Most of the major institutional land uses in Onslow County are located
within the municipalities and their extraterritorial areas. Within the county, the major institutional
' land uses include Camp Lejeune, Hofmann Forest, and Hammock Beach State Park. These land
uses combined occupy over 200,000 acres in Onslow County. The county does not own any
significant recreational sites or parks. There are 29 school sites scattered throughout the county.
' This does not include schools operated by Camp Lejeune.
6. Transportation
a. Roads and Highways
Onslow County is accessible to the coastal region and the Piedmont of North Carolina by
' a well established, highway system which includes U.S. Highways 17, 258, NC 53, and NC 24.
With the exception of NC 53, all of these thoroughfares are scheduled for improvements during
the planning period. Therefore, traffic conditions and accessibility to Onslow County should
' improve.
Based on Onslow County's size and existing transportation network, road and highway
right-of-way is estimated at approximately 8,500 acres. A more detailed discussion of
transportation conditions and improvements will be discussed in the Development Constraints:
Public Facilities section of this update. To date, the utilization of off -road vehicles has not been
an issue/problem in Onslow County.
b. Rail System
' The Seaboard rail line traversing the county along Highway U.S. 17 has been abandoned.
The Marine Corps has cognizance over a Department of Defense rail line extending from the
supply area at Camp Lejeune to Cherry Point. The Camp Lejeune rail line is used to move Marine
Corps equipment between the Base and Morehead City and also handles the entire coal -fuel
supply. However, the tracks are in a poor state of repair and used only on a limited basis. The
rail is authorized to operate as the Camp Lejeune Railroad Company with a system length of
approximately 40 miles.
' C. Albert Ellis Airport
The Albert Ellis Airport is located in western Onslow County off of State Road 111. This
facility occupies approximately 700 acres and is considered a primary commercial service airport.
The airport provides regularly scheduled commercial flights connecting to major hubs in the region.
The airport exists as a major potential resource for the county in the context of expanding
' and giving more variance to the local economy. The airport is surrounded by extensive
1 1-43

undeveloped properties suitable for industrial development. However, improvements to State '
Highway 111 must be accomplished for an airport industrial area to realize full potential.
The need for county zoning in the airport area has been identified as a potential asset for
future industrial growth. Residential development is encroaching into the area and good planning
practice dictates land use controls. Without adequate zoning, this area has the potential to incur
land use conflicts.
7. Basinwide Water Quality Management I
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) has initiated a basinwide approach to state water quality
management. The overall goal of basinwide management is to develop consistent and effective ,
long range water quality management strategies that protect the quality and intended uses of
North Carolina's surface waters while accommodating population increases and economic growth.
The State of North Carolina has been divided into seventeen major river basins. For each river
basin, water quality problems are identified and appropriate management strategies developed.
The plan features basinwide permitting of pollution discharges, integration of existing point and
nonpoint source control programs, and preparation of a basinwide management plan report.
The purpose of the basinwide management plan is to communicate to policy makers, the
regulated community, and the general public, the state's rationale, approaches, and long-term
strategies for each basin. Preparation of a basinwide management plan is a five year process.
In general, this process involves the following five major phases of development:
-- Collecting pertinent water quality and related information,
-- Analyzing the information and targeting problem areas,
-- Development management strategies,
-- Circulating a draft plan for public review and comment, and
-- Finalizing the plan.
Onslow County is located in the Cape Fear and White Oak basins. The Cape Fear and White Oak
basinwide management plans received NCDEM approval in December, 1995, and January, 1997,
respectively.
The long-range basinwide management goal is to provide a means of addressing the complex
problem of planning for reasonable economic growth while protecting and/or restoring the quality
and intended uses of surface waters.
In striving towards the long-range goal stated above, the Division of Environmental Management's
highest priority near -term goals will be the following:
-- Identify and restore the most seriously waters impaired in the basin;
-- Protect those waters known to be of the highest quality or supporting biological
communities of special importance;
-- Manage problem pollutants, particularly nutrients, biological oxygen demand and sediment
and fecal coliform, in order to correct existing water quality problems and to ensure
protection of those waters currently supporting their uses.
1-44 1

I
fl
In Onslow County, the US Natural Resources Conservation Service has identified 7 watersheds
within the Cape Fear Basin and 19 watersheds within the White Oak Basin. Each watershed has
been assigned a fourteen -digit code for the purpose of identification. The following table and Map
4 identify the watersheds located in Onslow County.
Table 31
Onslow County
Watersheds
Watershed Number
% of Watershed
in County*
River Basin
Township
03020106010010
57.9
White
Oak
White Oak
03020106010030
100.0
White
Oak
White Oak
03020106010070
99.8
White
Oak
White Oak
03020106020010
99.6
White
Oak
Swansboro, White Oak
03020106020060
99.9
White
Oak
Swansboro, White Oak
03020106020070
100.0
White
Oak
Swansboro
03020106020080
99.9
White
Oak
Swansboro
03030001010010
97.9
White
Oak
Richlands
03030001010020
100.0
White
Oak
Richlands
03030001010030
100.0
White
Oak
Richlands, White Oak
03030001010040
100.0
White
Oak
Jacksonville, Richlands, White Oak
03030001010050
100.0
White
Oak
Jacksonville, Swansboro
03030001020010
100.0
White
Oak
Jacksonville, Swansboro, White Oak
03030001020020
100.0
White
Oak
Swansboro, White Oak
03030001020030
100.0
White
Oak
Stump Sound, Swansboro
03030001020040
100.0
White
Oak
Stump Sound, Swansboro
03030001020050
99.9
White
Oak
Stump Sound
03030001030010
100.0
White
Oak
Jacksonville, Richlands
03030001030020
100.0
White
Oak
Jacksonville, Stump Sound,
Swansboro
03030001040005
99.9
Cape
Fear
Stump Sound
03030001040010
22.9
Cape
Fear
Stump Sound
03030007080010
56.5
Cape
Fear
Richlands
03030007080020
93.0
Cape
Fear
Jacksonville, Richlands
03030007100020
61.8
Cape
Fear
Jacksonville, Stump Sound
03030007100030
87.8
Cape
Fear
Stump Sound, Swansboro
03030007100040
25.6
Cape
Fear
Stump Sound
Source: Division of Coastal Management.
Ll
1-45

T° R
May,
The preparation of this map was financed in J
r
part through a grant provided by the North ;�
Carolina Coastal Management Program, r
through funds provided by the Coastal Zone '
Management Act of 1972, as amended, which l r o 020108010010jO
is administered by the Office of Ocean and 1333 (GREAT BRANCH,
Coastal Resource Management, National WHITE OAK RIVER
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
,'133
i
i
030300010200-
NORTHEAST(
12o
03030007080030
CYPRESS CREEK
LEGEND
CORPORATE LIMITS
MUNICIPAL EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION
03020106010031
WHITE OAK RIVtk,
BRICK KILN BRANCH r �.
pFNDE[? COUNTY'
CARTERET
r �h wh/re Oa COUNT It
River
V
MAP 4
WATERSHEDS
ONSLOW COUNTY
mile•
° I j 1-46
SCALE

1
8. Global TransPark
In 1991, the state enacted legislation and allocated funds to facilitate the development of the
Global TransPark (GTP). The intent of the GTP is to fully integrate air, rail, road, and sea forms
of transportation to serve the logistics requirements of manufacturing, distribution, agribusiness,
' and transportation related industries throughout the eastern United States.
The GTP has been sited at a large, underutilized FAA airport located in Kinston, approximately
80 miles east of North Carolina's Research Triangle Park and accessible to interstates, rail, and
the Morehead and Wilmington ports. The park includes a total of 15,300 acres, which includes
a 5,000 acre international air cargo -industrial complex centered by two long-range runways of over
11,500 feet each. Manufacturing and distribution facilities will be located along approximately 10
miles of customized taxiways and ramps, enabling planes to dock adjacent to manufacturing and
distribution facilities. A computer -controlled tram network will move raw materials, components,
' and final products within the TransPark and to and from connecting intermodal transportation
systems.
1
1
�l
li
Development of the GTP is being led by three groups - the Global TransPark Authority, the Global
TransPark Foundation, Inc., and the Global TransPark Development Commission. The Global
TransPark Authority is chaired by James B. Hunt, Jr., the Governor of North Carolina, and is
responsible for the planning, development, and operation of the GTP. The Global TransPark
Foundation, Inc., is raising funds through private donations to assist the Authority with the
development of the GTP. It will also play an important role in industrial recruitment. The Global
TransPark Development Commission is a coalition of thirteen counties, of which Onslow County
is a member, that form an Economic Development Zone established by the General Assembly.
The Commission will financially support economic development initiatives in the member counties
to accommodate businesses drawn to the region by the GTP.
The GTP will provide eastern North Carolina with the infrastructure necessary to become a major
center for industry and commerce. The GTP will provide additional jobs which will help provide
economic stability, reducing unemployment and poverty levels in the region. By the time the
Global TransPark reaches its twentieth year, it is expected to generate about 50,000 direct and
indirect jobs. Ultimately, more than 90,000 jobs will have ties to the GTP site.
9. Key Land Use Issues
During the development of this land useplan, the following key land use issues must be
addressed:
-- Development in "404" wetlands.
-- Expansion of central water and sewer areas.
-- Increasing traffic congestion, in particular along U.S. 17 and NC 24.
-- Continued support of economic/industrial development.
-- Development of an industrial park.
-- Establishment of county -wide zoning.
1-47

-- Development of a new solid waste disposal facility. I
-- Support of the Marine Corps Air Station at New River and the Albert Ellis Airport.
-- Intergovernmental cooperation, coordination, and planning.
-- Expansion of county -wide recreational opportunities.
-- Reduction of the county's number of substandard dwelling units. ,
-- Low elevation and sea level rise.
-- Regulation of "non -point" sources of water pollution.
-- Control of development in fragile and other areas of environmental concern.
-- Regulation of "corporate" farms and increased run-off of agricultural drainage.,
9 p 9
F. EXISTING PLANS, ORDINANCES, AND LAND USE CONTROLS
Onslow County has maintained a "conservative" approach to land use planning and regulations. '
The county supports planning through a full-time planning staff and active planning board.
However, minimal regulatory controls have been adopted. When possible, the county relies on
state and federal regulations to guide development. County -wide land use related zoning and a
minimum housing code have not been adopted. The local controls which are in place are
managed by the Board of Commissioners with the advice of the planning board and county
planning staff. ,
The following provides a summary of the county's land use related plans, codes, and ordinances.
1. 1991 Onslow County CAMA Land Use Plan Update ,
The 1991 Onslow County Land Use Plan Update was prepared to satisfy the CAMA planning ,
requirements set forth in 15A NCAC 7B. The plan established policies addressing the areas of
resource protection, resource production and management, economic and community
development, public participation, and storm hazard mitigation. The 1991 policies are supportive ,
of the 15A NCAC 7H minimum use standards. The 1991 policies that exceeded the state's
standards are summarized in the "Establishment of Information Base" section of this plan. In
addition to the establishment of policies, the 1991 plan assessed existing land use related issues ,
and forecast trends through a ten-year planning period.
2. Growth Management Program for Coastal Onslow County, Phase I, Part One, Land
Potential Study for the Stump Sound Area '
This Land Potential Study for the Stump Sound Area was completed in June, 1989, by McKim &
Creed Engineers, P.A. This study focused on the area east of NC 172 for the following reasons: ,
(1) a large portion of the study area consisted of fragile natural environments such as wetlands,
(2) the area contains unique places such as Morris, Thomas and Fulchers Landings, (3) the area
contains large land parcels already owned by developers, and (4) the general proximity to I
1-48 1

estuarine waters brings aesthetic factors and creates a strong market potential. The study
examines the carrying capacity of the area's utilities, roads and soils, and presents a Composite
Analysis/Sketch Land Development Plan. Part Two of the study is a Growth Management
Program Manual that also contains a preliminary draft for a development standards ordinance.
' 3. 1988 and 1998 Onslow County Recreation and Park Master Plans
The 1988 Onslow County Recreation and Park Master Plan was prepared by East Carolina
' University Leisure Systems Studies Department students and faculty. Dated April 27, 1988, this
plan evaluated and compared the recreation and park opportunities within the county and made
recommendations for the acquisition, administration, development and management of future
parks. The plan emphasized the necessity for development of three regional parks — Dixon,
Grants Creek, and Halfmoon Creek.
The county's Recreation and Park Master Plan was updated in January, 1998, again by the
Department of Recreation and Leisure Studies at East Carolina University. The update
recommends the development of three new district parks, a greenway system, additional water -
based recreation opportunities, and more indoor facilities (i.e., recreation centers).
4. Water System Master Plan
The Watec.System Master Plan was prepared by Black & Veatch, Engineers -Architects. The plan
is dated March 30, 1990, and includes detailed studies of the existing distribution system,
alternative water supply sources, and outlines improvements necessary to met the county's future
water requirements. In addition, the report includes a discussion of water treatment regulations,
alternative projects through design year 2005, and probable costs.
5. Onslow County Sewer System Feasibility Study
The Onslow County Sewer System Feasibility Study was prepared by Hazen and Sawyer, P.C.
Engineers, Raleigh, North Carolina and presented in January, 1987. This study was intended to
be a foundation for the development of a comprehensive sanitary sewer management program
for delivering sewer service to the citizens of Onslow County (residing outside of the service areas
' of other systems). Several alternatives for short and long-term wastewater collection and disposal
were investigated. System facilities were designed to meet the anticipated growth of the county
to the year 2006 and beyond. The program recommends a three -phased implementation
schedule involving five service districts.3
6. Flood Insurance Studies, Onslow County, North Carolina, Unincorporated Areas,
July, 2. 1987, and November 4. 1992
These studies were prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and investigate
the existence and severity of flood hazards in the unincorporated portions of the county and aid
in the administration of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 and the Flood Disaster Protection
Act of 1973. The initial study was used to convert the unincorporated area of the county to the
regular program of flood insurance by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Both
31n 1998, Onslow County in concert with its municipalities and the Marine Corps Base Lejeune agreed
to study the feasibility of a comprehensive wastewater treatment system. A resolution of intent was
executed by all parties on May 28, 1998.
1-49

studies describe principal flood problems and contain hydrologic, hydraulic, and wave height
analysis. Other contents include the delineation of flood boundaries, flood ways and velocity
zones; and insurance applications including the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM).
7. Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) 1991-1997
The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) was produced by the North Carolina Department
of Transportation in December, 1990. The TIP for Onslow includes a list of on -going and
proposed projects that reflects project descriptions, estimated cost, prior years' cost, funding type,
and schedule. The current TIP reflects 22 projects and two bicycle program needs. Projects
range in scope from the widening of US 17 to resurfacing and minor bridge replacements.
8. Zoning Ordinance
This ordinance was adopted on August 29, 1990, and applies only to areas designated as zoning
districts or jurisdictions as shown on the official Zoning Map. There is currently only one area of
jurisdiction, referred to as Golden Acres in Stump Sound Township. This is Special Development
District A containing 1,722 acres. The ordinance regulates land uses, densities, setbacks, parking
requirements, and other considerations.
Enforcement of this ordinance is provided by the Onslow County Planning Department. A
designated staff person serves as the zoning enforcement officer. Onslow County has undertaken
efforts to educate its citizen on the need for and value of county -wide zoning. This effort has been
directed by the Onslow County Planning Department. Zoning information presentations have
been made to the following community organizations during the development of this plan: Sneads
Ferry Community Awareness Club, Jacksonville Board of Realtors, Onslow County Home Builders
Association, Jacksonville Chamber of Commerce, Richlands Rotary Club, and American
Association of Professional Women. These efforts to educate the public on the need for zoning
will continue throughout the planning period.
9. Subdivision Regulations
This ordinance was adopted on September 17, 1990. Procedures for review of major and minor
subdivisions, platting requirements, minimum design standards, and planned unit development
requirements are included.
Enforcement of this ordinance is provided by the Onslow County Planning Department in
conjunction with the Onslow County Technical Review Committee and the County Planning Board.
10. Off -Premises Outdoor Advertising Ordinance
This ordinance was revised on September 8, 1992, and regulates the size, spacing, location, type,
maintenance, and permitting of off -premises outdoor advertising signs.
Enforcement of this ordinance is provided by the Onslow County Planning Department.
11. Mobile Home Park Ordinance
This ordinance was adopted on February 1,1988. This ordinance applies to parks containing nine
or more spaces. The ordinance contains minimum design standards (streets, spaces, parking,
and utilities) and the plan approval process.
J
I Ll
1-50

' Enforcement of this ordinance is provided by the Onslow County Planning Department in
conjunction with the County Community Development Department.
12. Emergency Management Ordinance for the County of Onslow
' This ordinance was adopted on October 18, 1982. The intent of this ordinance is to establish the
County Office of Emergency Management that will ensure the complete and efficient utilization
of all the county's resources to combat disasters. It designated the Office to be the coordinating
agency and the instrument through which the Board of Commissioners may exercise the authority
and discharge the responsibilities vested in it during disaster emergencies. The ordinance also
mandates the adoption and maintenance of comprehensive emergency management plans. The
' emergency operations plan and disaster relief and assistance plan has been proclaimed. This
plan, Disaster Relief and Assistance Plan for Onslow County was first prepared in November,
1982, and subsequently amended. The Onslow County Hurricane Evacuation Plan was prepared
by the Emergency Management Office in July, 1988, and is updated annually. The Hurricane Plan
is discussed further under item 19.
Enforcement of the Emergency Management Ordinance is coordinated through the Emergency
' Management Office with assistance from the Control and Support Group (law enforcement and
other agencies).
13. National Flood Insurance Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance, Regular Phase
This ordinance was adopted on April 2, 1990. The ordinance has the following purposes: restrict
or prohibit uses which are dangerous to health, safety, and property due to water or erosion
hazards, or which result in damaging increases in erosion or in flood heights or velocities. It
requires facilities that are vulnerable to floods, be protected against flood damage at the time of
initial construction. The ordinance controls the alteration of natural floodplains, stream channels,
and natural protective barriers which are involved in the accommodation of flood waters. It
controls filling, grading, dredging, and other development which may increase erosion of flood
' damage, and prevents or regulates the construction of flood barriers which will unnaturally divert
flood waters or which may increase flood hazards to other lands.
' Enforcement of the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance is through the Onslow County
Inspections Department with assistance from the Onslow County Planning Department.
14. Ordinance to Regulate Adult Businesses and Sexually -Oriented Businesses
' This ordinance was adopted on September 21, 1992, and provides for the regulation of adult
establishments within Onslow County's jurisdiction. The ordinance states the following purpose:
"For the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of
the citizenry of Onslow County, this article is adopted by the Board of
' Commissioners to regulate adult and sexually oriented businesses, as hereby
defined, located in the county. Further the regulations of this article have been
made with reasonable consideration, among other things, as to the character of the
' county and its areas and their peculiar suitability for these businesses."

This ordinance provides the following definition for adult businesses and sexually -oriented
businesses:
Adult Business: An adult business shall be defined as any business activity, club, or other
establishment which permits any employee, member, patron, or guest on its premises to exhibit
any specified anatomical areas before any other person or persons. '
Sexually -oriented Business: A sexually -oriented business shall be further defined as any
business activity, club, or other establishment, within which the exhibition, showing, rental or sale '
of materials distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on material depicting, describing, or
exhibiting specified anatomical areas or relating to specified sexual activities is permitted.
Regulated businesses shall include, but are not limited to: adult arcades, adult bookstores, adult '
motion pictures theaters, adult theaters, massage parlors, as defined in Section 8-204.
This ordinance is enforced by the Onslow County Sheriffs Department. '
15. North Carolina Building Code
The North Carolina Building Code consists of several components: I
Volume I General Construction
Volume I-B
Residential (1 & 2 Family Dwellings)
,
Volume II
Plumbing
Volume III
Mechanical
Volume IV
Electrical
,
Volume V Fire Prevention
Volume VI Gas
Enforcement of the code is the responsibility of the Onslow County Inspections Department. The '
hazardous materials sections of the Fire Prevention Volume are enforced by the County
Department of Emergency Management. '
16. Sanitary Sewage Collection. Treatment, and Disposal Laws and Rules
Article 11 of Chapter 130A of the General Statutes of North Carolina regulates sanitary sewage ,
systems. These regulations govem the treatment and disposal of domestic type sewage from
septic tank systems, privies, incinerating toilets, composting toilets, recycling toilets, or other such '
systems serving single or multiple -family residences, places of business, or places of public
assembly, the effluent from which is designed not to discharge to the land surface or surface
waters.
Enforcement of these regulations is accomplished by the Onslow County Health Department, ,
Environmental Health Section.
17. Onslow County Library System, Operation Library Agenda for Change '
This document which was completed in 1996 provides a long-range plan with incremental steps '
for change. Guidance is provided for the future provision of library facilities and services. Library
service to the various sections of the county is assessed.
1-52 1

18. Onslow County Master Facilities Plan
This plan was prepared by Onslow County between July, 1996, and April, 1998, and was
prompted by:
-- The need to promote efficient utilization of all public facilities staffed by county
personnel.
-- The desire to save tax dollars by merging departments from multiple leased office
' -- buildings into fewer, county -owned office buildings.
The realization that the county should enhance its public image by demonstrating
the ability to more effectively manage public funds.
' -- The widespread shortages of office, equipment, conference, storage, and parking
space among Onslow County's departments and agencies.
The Facility Analysis is a comprehensive, long-term look at County Government Facilities. It
' contains the information from which the Board of County Commissioners can begin to evaluate
and address facility needs, making programs more accessible to the public, as well as saving
money in rent and operational costs.
' 19. Onslow County Hurricane Plan
' The Onslow County Hurricane Plan was prepared by Onslow County Emergency Management.
The plan underwent a thorough rewrite in 1996/1997 following Hurricanes Bertha and Fran. The
plan was developed to provide for an orderly and coordinated evacuation to minimize the effects
of hurricanes on residents and visitors in Onslow County. The plan provides for the alerting of key
officials, the evacuation of the public from high risk areas, and the designation of shelters for
evacuees. It also provides for the reentry into evacuated areas when appropriate. This plan was
' developed to protect life and minimize property damage while providing essential services to the
extent possible.
' G. LAND AND WATER USE COMPATIBILITY ANALYSIS
1. General Discussion
' Onslow County has been experiencing some sig
nificant land use compatibility problems. Although
' these problems are cause for alarm, it should be noted that they are not unique to Onslow County.
Many coastal communities that do not have county -wide sewer or zoning are experiencing the
same kinds of problems. This section will discuss only the land use -related issues. Onslow
County's water resources are discussed in detail in the development constraints chapter of the
plan. The following summarizes the major land use compatibility issues in Onslow County. The
majority of these issues were also identified in the 1991 Land Use Plan Update.
' -- Most of the developed and developing areas within Onslow County are not served by a
central sewer system.
' -- Continued threat to marine resources from agricultural run-off.
-- Much of the county's residential and resort development is occurring in or near estuarine
shoreline areas.
' I-53

"404"
-- wetland areas and associated federal regulations present obstacles to development
and both agricultural and forestry land uses. In addition, development may damage
valuable "404" wetland areas.
'
-- Compatibility problems between the Albert Ellis Airport and adjacent residential land uses
have increased during the 1990s. While the impacts on adjacent development from
aircraft operations should be minimized to the extent possible, the long-range operational
'
viability of the airport should be preserved.
-- Soil limitations throughout much of the county present severe obstacles to development.
'
-- While Onslow County has actively supporting housing improvement programs, a significant
amount of substandard housing continues to exist. The county has not had a minimum
'
housing code to aid in the elimination of substandard housing conditions.
-- Except for the Golden Acres area, located in the Stump Sound Township, county zoning
has not been adopted to regulate development.
-- Continued development of scattered point discharge sources of pollution along the
'
county's shoreline.
-- Increased impervious areas resulting in greater stormwater run-off.
'
2. Unplanned Development
'
As indicated in the existing land use analysis, 1,821 residential lots were approved for subdivision
from 1992 to 1996. While all were approved under regulation of the county's subdivision
ordinance, there were no controls such as zoning in place to regulate density or location. This has
created excessive densities in the context of available services and conflicting land uses.
'
Conflicting land uses generally result when commercial or industrial businesses locate adjacent
to residential dwellings. In Onslow County, concentrations of conflicting land uses are generally
located along major thoroughfares and in the Albert Ellis Airport area. Historically, there has been
a conflicting land use problem with the location of junkyards and adult entertainment '
establishments. However, the county's adult business and sexually -oriented businesses
ordinance, enacted in September, 1992, has significantly improved the problem with adult
businesses. '
Some problems resulting from unplanned development will continue to exist between the Albert
Ellis Airport and surrounding land uses. The 1991 Onslow County Land Use Plan Update included
the lack of zoning in the airport area as a significant land use issue. As development continues '
to encroach on the airport, the potential for land use conflicts will increase.
Perhaps the county's greatest problem stemming from a lack of planning continues to be the '
failure to deal comprehensively with sewage treatment. Only Jacksonville, Richlands, Holly Ridge,
and Swansboro provide municipal sewage treatment with limited extensions into unincorporated
areas. With the exception of areas served by package treatment plants, and some areas adjacent '
to the four municipalities with existing central sewer systems, the unincorporated areas of the
county are without central sewer service. The comprehensive development of a central sewer
1
1-54 1

service system and the adoption of county -wide zoning would greatly improve land and water use
compatibility problems in the county.
' 3. Changes in Predominant Land Uses
' The existing land development patterns are expected to continue. However, the following land
use changes may be expected during the planning period:
'
-- Each year, "404" wetland areas will continue to be lost.
-- Agricultural areas adjacent to incorporated areas and along U.S. Highways 17 and 258,
and State Route 24 will continue to be converted to urban uses.
-- The Stump Sound ORW designation will slow or prohibit shoreline developments that
'
cause additional point source pollution discharge.
— Annexation actions by municipalities may be expected to continue.
-- Transportation improvements, discussed in detail in the public facilities needs section of
this plan, could stimulate significant land use changes.
'
— Increases in the area provided central sewer service will stimulate land use changes.
-- The construction of an industrial park in the county would initiate land use change.
-- Within the agricultural industry, there is a conversion from traditional row crops to animal
husbandry operations.
'
-- Moderate level of conversion from forested and other agricultural areas to residential uses.
' 4. Summary
This section is intended to highlight the key land use issues and problems being experienced by
Onslow, County. It is emphasized that this is only a summary. The plan must be read in its entirety
to fully appreciate the complexity of the issues confronting Onslow County. The policies included
in this plan must address the following:
' — Lack of county -wide sewer.
Regulation of "corporate" farms and increased run-off of agricultural drainage.
— Lack of county -wide zoning.
' -- Development of "404" wetland areas.
-- Continued support of economic/industrial development.
Protection of AECs.
' = Development of an industrial park.
Soil limitations throughout much of the county present severe obstacles to development.
-- Intergovernmental cooperation, coordination, and planning.
' I-55

H. DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINTS: LAND SUITABILITY
Climate
Onslow County generally is hot and humid in summer, but the coast frequently is cooled by sea
breezes. Winter is cool, and there is an occasional brief cold spell. Rains occur throughout the
year and are fairly heavy. Snowfall is rare. Annual precipitation is adequate for all of the crops
commonly grown in the county.
In winter, the average temperature is 45 degrees F and the average daily minimum temperature
is 32 degrees. In summer, the average temperature is 76 degrees and the average daily
maximum temperature is 87 degrees.
Of the total annual precipitation, nearly 34 inches, or about 60%, usually falls in April through
September. The growing season for most crops falls within this period. In two years out of ten,
the rainfall in April through September is less than 27 inches. Thunderstorms occur on about 45
days each year.
The average seasonal snowfall is about three inches. The greatest snow depth at any one time
during the period of record was four inches.
The average relative humidity in midafternoon is about 55%. Humidity is higher at night, and the
average at dawn is about 85%. The sun shines 65% of the time possible in summer and 60% in
winter. The prevailing wind is from the southwest. Average windspeed is highest, ten miles per
hour, in spring. Every few years, a hurricane crosses the area.
2. Topography/Geology
Nearly all of Onslow County is on the lower coastal plain. Much of the county is nearly level and
is in wide, undissected interstream areas. Water movement is slow in these interstream areas
because of minimal relief, and the soils are generally poorly drained. A thick mantle of organic
matter has developed in the Hofmann Forest and Great Sandy Run Pocosin areas, and the
underlying mineral material in these areas is nearly impermeable.
The Talbot and Wicomico Surfaces of Pleistocene age cover nearly all of Onslow County. The
Wicomico Surface is 42 to 100 feet in elevation, and it covers the northeastern and northwestern
parts of the county. The Talbot Surface is 24 to 42 feet in elevation. It covers about two-thirds
of the county in the central, southeastern, and southwestern parts. The Pamlico Surface is at sea
level to 24 feet in elevation, and it covers a narrow strip near the coast. The northern tip of the
county is covered by the Sunderland Surface, which is 100 feet or more in elevation.
The unconsolidated surface sediment is about ten feet thick in the northern part of the county and
30 feet thick in the southern coastal part. The Yorktown Formation of Miocene age underlies the
surficial sediment unless it has been removed by erosion. This formation either is very thin or
does not occur north of Jacksonville, but it is about 60 feet thick near the coast. The Castle Hayne
Limestone Formation of Eocene age underlies the Yorktown Formation. Where the Yorktown
Formation has been removed by erosion, the surficial sediment overlies the Castle Hayne
Formation. The Castle Hayne Formation is wedge shaped and is thicker near the coast. The Pee
Dee Formation of Cretaceous age underlies the Castle Hayne Formation. It is within 30 feet of
n
[l-
I

1 the surface northwest of Richlands but is at a greater depth in the southern coastal part of the
county.
3. Groundwater
' Groundwater sources supply all of the water for domestic uses in Onslow County. The Surficial
Sands aquifer is ten to 30 feet deep. It yields large amounts of water because the water table is
high in most of the county. The Tertiary Limestone Unit, made up mostly of the Castle Hayne
' Formation, lies between the Surficial Sands and the Pee Dee Formation. This unit is thinner
toward the northern part of the county, but it is an important aquifer throughout the county. The
Surficial Sands and Tertiary Limestone aquifers furnish most of the water for the county. This
' aquifer is also used extensively by municipalities and industries within the central coastal plain.
Within the major pumping centers, excessive concentrated pumpage may reduce the productivity
of the aquifer until it is no longer usable. In Onslow County, excessive pumping may cause both
lateral and vertical intrusion of poor quality connate sea water. However, the Pee Dee Formation
' supplies a few wells in the northwestern part. It is the deepest and oldest of the formations, and
it is a major source of groundwater.
Map 5, "Drinking Water Supply," focuses on factors that may affect Onslow County's water supply.
These factors include the location of water supply wells and point source discharge sites. The
county's water supply service areas have also been indicated on this map.
' 4. Flood Hazard Areas
Flood Insurance Rate Maps were prepared for Onslow County in February, 1985, by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The 100-year flood serves as the base flood for the
purpose of floodplain management. The 100-year flood line represents the level that water would
' reach or "rise to" during a flood that may be expected to occur on the average of once during a
100-year period. Thus, there is a 1 % chance of a 100-year flood occurring during any one year.
Map 6 provides the approximate boundaries of the Onslow County areas which would be
inundated by a 100-year flood. These areas may also suffer some hazards resulting from storm
generated waves. Such wave action would normally be associated with strong coastal storms.
Because of the additional hazards associated with wave action, the National Flood Insurance
Program regulations require more demanding construction procedures in those areas affected by
wave action, including elevating structures on piles or piers. It should be noted that the flood zone
has not been mapped for Camp Lejeune property.
The flood areas are primarily located along river bottoms, river tributaries, and pocosins.
1 1-57

To
Ix
0
The preparation of this map was financed in
part through a grant provided by the North
Carolina Coastal Management Program,
through funds provided by the Coastal Zone
Management Act of 1972, as amended, which
is administered by the Office of Ocean and
Coastal Resource Management, National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
GOON
LEGEAD
CORPORATEMUNICIPAL
EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION
.................
SUPPLY SERVICE AREAS
WATER SUPPLY WELLS
POINTWATER
FENDER COUNTY
MAP 5
DRINKING WATER SUPPLY
ONSLOW COUNTY
miles
° I � ? ` 1-58
SCALE

The preparation of this map was financed in
part through a grant provided by the North
Carolina Coastal Management Program,
through funds provided by the Coastal Zone
Management Act of 1972, as amended, which
is administered by the Office of Ocean and
Coastal Resource Management, National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
-7
13 .10 130
I-C 1302
HW .. 7300
1 312
New V River
Marine Corp
Air Station
at New River
230
215
2
1162
\1220
1 4
175
tit. W
1218
, AIRPORT
V
1
11 116
119 t
1209
121
2
10
1 0
203
1111
120
L
—HWy- 21
107
NORTH
Q
120 5
1207
518
GREATER SANDY RUN
1528
2
TRAINING AREA
1529
. . . . . . . . . . .
201
t;.
-:;t -
1544
......
I1518
1546,,c
1104
1
531
U)
z
534
LEGEND
CORPORATE LIMITS
LLY RIDGE
MUNICIPAL EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION
0
...........
.............
t t . . ....
SURF CV
Ir-
PIEND En
C0(jjVr)'
100-YEAR FLOOD ZONE
z
LU
0
0
z
.j
IMAP 6
FLOOD HAZARD MAP
ONSLOW COUNTY
miles
1-59
SCALE

1 In 1986, the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers prepared maps of coastal North Carolina which
delineated the flooding which may be expected to occur as a result of hurricanes. The maps were
' prepared utilizing a computer base model named SLOSH, Sea Lake Overlaid Surge From
Hurricanes. The model plots hurricane related flooding which may result from a number of
characteristics including wind speed, wind direction, time, tide, etc.
' Map 7 indicates the areas of Onslow County which may be affected by hurricane -generated storm
surge. The following defines the five storm surge categories:
' Category 1. Winds of 74 to 95 miles per hour. Damage primarily to shrubbery, trees,
foliage, and unanchored mobile homes. No appreciable wind damage to other structures.
' Some damage to poorly constructed signs. Storm surge possibly 4 to 5 feet above normal.
Low-lying roads inundated, minor pier damage, some small craft in exposed anchorage
torn from moorings.
' Category 2. Winds of 96 to 110 miles per hour. Considerable damage to shrubbery and
tree foliage; some trees blown down. Major damage to exposed mobile homes. Extensive
damage to poorly constructed signs. Some damage to roofing materials of buildings; some
' window and door damage. No major wind damage to buildings. Storm surge possibly 6
to 8 feet above normal. Coastal roads and low-lying escape routes inland cut by rising
water 2 to 4 hours before arrival of hurricane center. Considerable damage to piers.
Marinas flooded. Small craft in unprotected anchorages torn from moorings. Evacuation
of some shoreline residences and low-lying island areas required.
Category 3. Winds of 111 to 130 miles per hour. Foliage torn from trees; large trees
blown down. Practically all poorly constructed signs blown down. Some damage to
roofing materials of buildings; some window and door damage. Some structural damage
to small buildings. Mobile homes destroyed. Storm surge possibly 9 to 12 feet above
normal. Serious flooding at coast and many smaller structures near coast destroyed;
larger structures near coast damaged by battering waves and floating debris. Low-lying
' escape routes inland cut by rising water 3 to 5 hours before hurricane center arrives.
Category 4. Winds of 131 to 155 miles per hour. Shrubs and trees blown down; all signs
down. Extensive damage to roofing materials, windows, and doors. Complete failure of
' roofs on many small residences. Complete destruction of mobile homes. Storm surge
possibly 13 to 18 feet above normal. Major damage to lower floors of structures near
' shore due to flooding and battering by waves and floating debris. Low-lying escape routes
inland cut by rising water 3 to 5 hours before hurricane center arrives. Major erosion of
beaches.
' Category 5. Winds greater than 155 miles per hour. Shrubs and trees blown down;
considerable damage to roofs of buildings; all signs down. Very severe and extensive
damage to windows and doors. Complete failure of roofs on many residences and
industrial buildings. Extensive shattering of glass in windows and doors. Some complete
building failures. Small buildings overturned or blown away. Complete destruction of
mobile homes. Storm surge possibly greater than 18 feet above normal. Major damage
' to lower floors of all structures less than 15 feet above sea level. Low-lying escape routes
inland cut by rising water 3 to 5 hours before hurricane center arrives.
1
1-60

LEGEND
Category 1 - 2 Surge Area
Category 3 Additional Surge Area
Category 4 -5 Additional Surge Area
St
0 '/2 1 2
'4,
SCALE IN MILES
17
a •\ o . r,l _..v ,.• new �'
7
MAP 7
ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
STORM SURGE INUNDATION AREAS
Ilk,
it
tv
or
Ilk
A
l
-n ww
R F A T
•
F o c o s I x
Jai.
c
O
A
1-61

' A Category 3 storm would inundate approximately 10% of the county's planning jurisdiction.
A long-range flooding problem could result from anticipated sea level rise. During the past
century, the sea has risen approximately one foot. Generally, experts expect the sea level rise
to accelerate during the next century and rise an additional four to seven feet. Such a rise in sea
' level would have a significant impact on Onslow County. Much of the county's shoreline and
wetland areas could be lost. This is a serious potential problem which must be carefully monitored
by the county and mitigative actions defined.
' 5. Fragile Areas
' Fragile areas are areas which could easily be damaged or destroyed by inappropriate, unplanned,
or poorly planned development. These areas include both Areas of Environmental Concern
(AECs) and Natural Resource Fragile Areas as shown on Map 8. The following discusses each
type of area in detail.
a. Coastal Wetlands
' The coastal wetlands are generally delineated on Map 8, Areas of Environmental Concern.
Within the county's planning jurisdiction, coastal wetlands are scattered along the New River,
White Oak River, and Intracoastal Waterway. However, it is emphasized that the specific
locations of coastal wetlands can be determined only through on -site investigation and analysis.
Coastal wetlands are defined as salt marshes regularly- or irregularly -flooded by tides, including
wind tides, provided this shall not include hurricane or tropical storm tides. These areas contain
some, but not necessarily all of the following marsh plant species: Smooth Cordgrass, Black
Needlerush, Glasswort, Salt Grass, Sea Lavender, Bulrush, Saw Grass, Cat -tail, Salt Meadow
Grass, and Salt Reed Grass. The coastal wetlands are vital to the complex food chain found in
estuaries. They provide marine nursery areas and are essential to a sound commercial fishing
industry. Coastal wetlands also serve as barriers against flood damage and control erosion
between the estuary and uplands.
ib. Coastal Waters Designations
Inland waters are all inland waters except private ponds and all water connecting or
tributary to coastal sounds or the ocean extending inland from the dividing line between coastal
waters and inland waters. The Marine Fisheries Commission and the Wildlife Resources
Commission have designated the following inland waters in Onslow County: Brinson Creek,
Codels Creek, French Creek, Duck Creek, Freemans Creek, Calebs Creek, Grants Creek,
Southwest Creek (above Maple Hill Landing), Northeast Creek (above railroad bridge), Wallace
Creek (above the first bridge upstream from the mouth), Queens Creek (above Frazier's Landing),
White Oak River (above Grant's Creek), and Webbs Creek (above railroad bridge). Coastal
waters are the Atlantic Ocean, the various coastal sounds, and estuarine waters up to the dividing
line between coastal waters and inland waters.
' I-62

O
The preparation of this map was financed in
part through a grant provided by the North
Carolina Coastal Management Program,
through funds provided by the Coastal Zone
Management Act of 1972, as amended, which
Is administered by the Office of Ocean and
Coastal Resource Management, National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
GOB
\ �[cIIi) r
i 1230 tib
123
1 1236
ro \\ 12
Chi \
o ,
I
4
J'3'r 13
311
,?7>
A � j, V,
1317
314
W • 258
315
21 1224
12
12 2
4
1249
arl1218
4J
\.
1210
1210
0,
\•
LEGEND
CORPORATE LIMITS
MUNICIPAL EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION
GENERALIZED COASTAL WETLANDS -=
e
-
GENERALIZED 404 WETLANDS x "
.;I
OUTSTANDING RESOURCE WATERS AND HIGH
QUALITY WATER
GREAT SANDY RUN POCOSIN
WHITE OAK POCOSIN
SEE NOTE 1 ESTUARINE WATERS
SEE NOTE 2 ESTUARINE SHORELINE
SEE NOTE 1 PUBLIC TRUST AREAS
WATERSHED BOUNDARY LINES*
~l f 1
434
796 yFj}
43 434
42 436.y`7
411
324
CARTERET
rW ; . �Vh�re _ - - O COUNTY
- T River
442 1443
r.A '
14 ' x SWANSSO 0 -
arine Corp
r Station
New River ipr
1162 1116
1134J21:31 1 i105
1 1 4 11 4 Ci
175 J + Z
r• 11
1 12
109
108
207
<iC p,�Si'� r..♦'+IY Yr�•4`1�5.�'4Y itr�♦
rr
3 r� -� Y♦ Y 1 •Z.t J Y i.
Jf JJi 7J �fJ - ♦Y i+ �Z'y�] ,+�(�y`7i'. • 11 ,`,
ss ,
108201 Greater Sandy Run Training Area's-�;
,,ri �% •,
V.
0
pENO�R COUNTY
*Watershed names and 14-digit numbers
are depicted on Map 4.
Air Base
1 8
1644
618 1549
1531
NOTES
1.
ALL WATERS UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF
ONSLOW COUNTY ARE EITHER ESTUARINE
WATERS OR PUBLIC TRUST AREAS AS DEFINED
IN 15A NCAC 7H.0206 ESTUARINE WATERS AND
.0207 PUBLIC TRUST AREAS.
= 2.
ALL AREAS LYING 0-75' LANDWARD OF THE
MEAN HIGH WATER LEVEL OF ESTUARINE
WATERS ARE CLASSIFIED AS ESTUARINE
SHORELINES. BECAUSE OF MAP SCALE, THESE
AREAS CANNOT BE ACCURATELY MAPPED.
PRECISE LOCATIONS MUST BE DETERMINED IN
THE FIELD THROUGH CAMA REVIEW AND PERMIT
r z
APPROVAL.
Q
ALL
3.
L.UJ
OCEAN HAZARD AND INLET HAZARD:
ONSLOW COUNTY OCEAN HAZARD AND INLET
1,� V
HAZARD AREAS ARE UNDER EITHER MUNICIPAL
�1
OR FEDERAL JURISDICTION.
V
L
1—
z
r
a
MAP 8
AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN j
AND NATURAL FRAGILE AREAS
ONSLOW COUNTY
Miles
q 1 ' 1-63
SCALE

IC. Public Trust Areas
Public trust areas are all waters of the Atlantic Ocean and the lands thereunder from the
mean high water mark to the seaward limit of state jurisdiction; all natural bodies of water subject
to measurable lunar tides and lands thereunder to the mean high water mark; all navigable natural
bodies of water and lands thereunder to the mean high water level or mean water level as the
case may be, except privately -owned lakes to which the public has no right of access; all water
in artificially created bodies of water containing significant public fishing resources or other public
resources which are accessible to the public by navigation; and all waters in artificially created
bodies of water in which the public has acquired rights by prescription, custom, usage, dedication,
or any other means. In determining whether the public has acquired rights in artificially created
' bodies of water, the following factors shall be considered:
(1) the use of the body of water by the public,
(2) the length of time the public has used the area,
(3) the value of public resources in the body of water,
(4) whether the public resources in the body of water are mobile to the
extent that they can move into natural bodies of water,
(5) whether the creation of the artificial body of water
required permission from the state, and
(6) the value of the body of water to the public for
navigation from one public area to another public
area.
These areas are significant because the public has rights in these areas, including
navigation and recreation. The public trust areas also support valuable commercial and sports
fisheries, have aesthetic value, and are important resources for economic development.
It is difficult to map the public trust areas. The areas must be determined through in -field
analysis and definition.
rd. Estuarine Waters
Estuarine waters are generally brackish waters found in coastal estuaries and bays. They
are the dominant component and bonding element of the entire estuarine system, integrating
aquatic influences from both the land and the sea. The estuarine waters are among the most
productive natural environments. The waters support the valuable commercial and sports fisheries
of the coastal area which are comprised of estuarine dependent species such as menhaden,
flounder, shrimp, crabs, and oysters. Estuarine waters and estuarine shorelines make up the most
significant components of the estuarine system in Onslow County's planning jurisdiction.
e. Outstanding Resource Waters
In 1989, the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission designated certain
waters within North Carolina as Outstanding Resource Waters. These areas were designated
because they were considered to be significant marine resource areas having relatively clean and
' pristine waters, and having significant value as recreational and natural resource areas.
1
1-64

The following describes the Bear Island and Stump Sound ORW areas:
The Bear Island ORW (White Oak River Basin) includes all waters
within an area defined by a line from Bogue Inlet to the mainland at
SR 1117 to a line across Bogue Sound from the southwest side of
Gales Creek to Rock Point, including Taylor Bay and the '
Intracoastal Waterway.
The Stump Sound ORW (Cape Fear River Basin) includes all
waters of Stump Sound and Alligator Bay from market Number 17
to the western edge of Permuda Island, but excluding Rogers Bay,
the Kings Creek Restricted Area, and Mill Creek.
f. Estu
arine Shorelines
Estuarine shorelines are those non -ocean shorelines which are especially vulnerable to
erosion, flooding, or other adverse effects of wind and water. They are intimately connected to
the estuary. The area extends from the mean high water level or normal water level along the
estuaries, sounds, bays, and brackish waters for a distance of 75 feet landward. Development
within the estuarine shorelines influences the quality of estuarine life and is subject to the
damaging processes of shorefront erosion and flooding. Estuarine shoreline areas of
environmental concern which are adjacent to outstanding resource waters extend 575 feet
landward from the mean high water level or normal water level. The county has not opposed the
construction of bulkheads along estuarine shorelines.
g. Historic and Archaeological Sites
Within Onslow County there are five sites which have been approved for inclusion on the
National Register of Historic Places. These include:
1) Alum Spring, Catherine Lake vicinity
2) Avirett-Stephens Plantation, US 258/24, Richlands vicinity
3) Catherine Lake Historic District, Catherine Lake
4) Futral Family Farm, Fountain vicinity
5) Venters Farm Historic District, Richlands vicinity
In addition to these sites, there are 32 additional sites currently on the study list for
inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places.
I,
1) Adams School, Richlands vicinity
2) David Sanders Aman House, west side SR 1434, Belgrade vicinity
3) Bell -Strobel House, north side SR 1331, Belgrade vicinity
4) Brocks Rural Historic District
5) Uriah Canady House, SR 1520, Sneads Ferry vicinity
6) Cavanaugh House, west side SR 1308, Gum Branch vicinity
7) Eli Cox House, west side SR 1302, Huffmantown vicinity
8) Ennett-Hill House, Twisted Oak Trailer Park '
9) Everett House, north side SR 1534, Folkstone vicinity
10) Fennison House, east side SR 1509, Bear Creek vicinity
11) James R. Franck House, east side SR 1307, Francktown vicinity I
1-65 1

1-1
Ll
n
�i
12) Isaac Newton Henderson House, west side SR 1428, Hubert vicinity
13) Hardy Horn Farm, north side SR 1213, Catherine Lake vicinity
14) Humphrey -Manning Farm, west side SR 1221, Gregory Fork vicinity
15) Thomas Jefferson Jarman House, east side US 258/24, Tar Landing vicinity
16) Justice Family Farm, south side SR 1246, Waltons Store vicinity
17) Mattocks Family House, south side SR 1442, Silverdale vicinity
18) Morton Family House, north side SR 1427, Kellum vicinity
19) Sigmond Redd House, north side SR 1537, Morris Landing vicinity
20) Rhodestown Rural Historic District
21) Saint Thomas AME Zion Church, west side SR 1434, Silverdale vicinity
22) Sanders Farm Rural Historic District
23) Henry Howard Sandlin House, south side Sr 1238, Jarmantown vicinity
24) Scott Family Farm, Waltons Store vicinity
25) Benjamin C. Smith House, north side SR 1331, Belgrade vicinity
26) Sampson A. Starling House, SR 1428, Starling vicinity
27) Stump Sound Primitive Baptist Church, east side SR 1538, Holly Ridge vicinity
28) Tabernacle Elementary School, east side SR 1434, Morion Fork vicinity
29) Cyrus Thompson House, north side SR 1229, Gregory Forks vicinity
30) White Oak Rural Historic District 1, northwest side SR 1331 and 1333, Belgrade
vicinity
31) White Oak Rural Historic District 2, northeast side SR 1331, Belgrade vicinity
32) Yopps Primitive Baptist Church, SR 1515, Sneads Ferry vicinity
Archaeological sites may also exist within the county's planning jurisdiction. The Division
of Archives and History is particularly concerned with areas along and near creeks, rivers, and
streams where development has not occurred. Such areas may contain undisturbed and
significant archeological remains. The Division recommends review of all plans for development
in all undisturbed areas.
h. 404 Wetlands
404 wetlands are areas covered by water or that have water-logged soils for long periods
during the growing season. Plants growing in wetlands are capable of living in soils lacking
oxygen for at least part of the growing season. Some wetlands, such as swamps, are obvious.
Others are sometimes difficult to identify because they may be dry during part of the year.
Wetlands include, but are not limited to, bottomlands, forests, swamps, pocosins, pine savannahs,
bogs, marshes, and wet meadows.
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act requires that anyone interested in depositing dredged
or fill material into "waters of the United States," including wetlands, must apply for and receive
a permit for such activities.
Map 8 provides a general delineation of wetlands areas. 404 wetland areas are scattered
throughout the county's planning jurisdiction. A more detailed map provided by the Division of
Coastal Management will be left on file, and available for public review, at the Onslow County
Community Development Department. This map is much too detailed to be reduced and included
in the land use plan. However, the specific locations of wetlands areas must be determined
through specific on -site analysis by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District Office.

Wetlands are a significant natural resource because they provide recharge areas for ,
groundwater; serve as filter traps for sediment, pesticides and other pollutants; provide non-
structural flood control; buffer against shoreline erosion; serve as buffer zones between upland
activities and valuable aquatic systems; and provide habitats for numerous furbearing animals,
endangered species, and other wildlife.
i. Natural Heritage Areas
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program of the Division of Parks and Recreation '
works to identify and facilitate protection of the most ecologically significant natural areas
remaining in the state. Natural areas may be identified because they provide important habitat
for rare species or because they contain outstanding examples of the rich natural diversity of this ,
state. High quality natural areas are valuable resources that make North Carolina and its counties
attractive to live in and to visit. In addition to their educational and cultural uses, natural areas are
important reservoirs of native plants and animals and are key resources for recreation.
A recently completed survey by the NC Natural Heritage Program has determined that
there are 49 Significant Natural Heritage Areas in Onslow County. Only Brunswick and Jackson
counties have more designated areas among the 100 counties in the state. These natural areas
reflect both the county's coastal position, and its occurrence within a concentrated longleaf pine
and pocosin complex extending from Croatan National Forest to Green Swamp near the South
Carolina border.
The majority of these areas (29) are in Camp Lejeune Marine Corps Base. They comprise
a great variety of natural habitats, including pine savannas and flatwoods, pine/scrub oak
sandhills, cypress savannas, ponds, pocosin communities, tidal marshes, blackwater swamps,
mesic hardwoods, coastal dunes, and maritime forests. There are also several significant natural
areas in Onslow County outside of Camp Lejeune. Among these are high quality tidal marsh
systems associated with the county's coastal rivers and creeks, and a few locations of very rare
savanna type marsh systems in the Maple Hill area. The locations of the Great Sandy Run and
White Oak Pocosins, both of which are significant natural heritage areas, have been provided on
Map 8.
These natural areas are reservoirs of biological diversity, and serve as sanctuaries for
native plants and animals whose survival depends upon them. They are also key resources for
recreational activities, such as hunting, and make significant contributions to the economy, such
as the critical importance of tidal marshes to commercial fishing. Natural areas also protect the
environment through the provision and protection of groundwater recharge areas.
j. Maritime Forests
Maritime forests are areas containing native salt tolerant vegetation. Exposure to salt
spray causes the vegetation to have a sheared appearance that is shaped according to contours
of adjacent land forms. The forests contain loblolly pine, sweet gum, live oak, and red maple as
the dominant tree types. The trees grow slowly because of very low available water capacity,
occasional salt water flooding, and exposure to salt spray.
Except for Huggins Island, there are limited concentrations of maritime forests within
Onslow County's planning jurisdiction. Huggins Island contains some maritime forest areas which
have been protected through deed restrictions.
-67

� Ik. Marinas and Mooring Fields
Marinas are defined as any publicly or privately owned dock, basin, or wet boat storage
facility constructed to accommodate more than 10 boats and providing any of the following
services: permanent or transient docking spaces, dry storage, fueling facilities, haulout facilities,
and repair service. Excluded from this definition are boat ramp facilities allowed access only,
temporary docking, and none of the preceding services.
' Onslow County allows the construction of upland and open water marinas and any
associated drystack storage facilities that are in compliance with the county's zoning ordinance
and other applicable regulations.
A "freestanding mooring" is any means to attach a ship, boat, vessel, floating structure, or
other water craft to a stations underwater device mooring buoy, buoyed anchor, or piling as
stationary � 9 Y, Y P 9
long as the piling is not associated with an existing or proposed pier, dock, or boathouse). When
more than one freestanding mooring is used in the same general vicinity, it is commonly referred
to as a mooring field. Onslow County has not regulated the establishment of mooring field within
its planning jurisdiction and mooring fields have not been a problem.
I. Floating Homes
A floating home or structure is any structure, not a boat, supported by a means of flotation,
designed to be used without a permanent foundation, which is used or intended for human
habitation or commerce. A structure will be considered a floating structure when it is inhabited or
used for commercial purposes for more than thirty days in any one location. A boat may be
deemed a floating structure when its means of propulsion has been removed or rendered
inoperative and it contains at least 200 square feet of living space area.
There are currently no known floating homes in Onslow County.
M. Sound and Estuarine Islands
Onslow County has extensive sound and estuarine islands. The county has discouraged
the development of these islands. In particular, the county has expressed concern over the
development of Huggins Island.
n. Channel Maintenance and Interstate Waterways
The Intracoastal Waterway traverses eastern Onslow County. The waterway provides an
indispensable route for fishermen, commercial barge traffic, and recreational boat traffic, all
contributing to the county's economic well-being. The waterway is maintained by the U.S. Corps
of Engineers. Recent years have seen a continuing increase in waterway traffic as tourism has
grown.
Proper maintenance of channels is very important to Onslow County because of the
substantial economic impact of commercial fisheries and recreational boating. If silt or other
' deposits fill in the channels, safe and efficient movement of commercial fishing and recreational
vessels could be impeded.
1-68

6. Soils '
Onslow County's soils are predominantly poorly to very poorly drained. Extensive areas of the
county have soils with severe limitations for development and septic tank usage. According to the
U.S. Soil Conservation Service, approximately 57% of the county's soils have such limitations.
Map 9 provides a summary of the Onslow County soil associations, their characteristics, and
locations.
Prime farmland soils, as defined by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, are soils that are best
suited to food, feed, forage, fiber, and oilseed crops. Such soils have properties that favor the '
economic production of sustained high yields of crops. The soils need only to be treated and
managed by acceptable farming methods. The moisture supply must be adequate, and the
growing season must be sufficiently long. Prime farmland soils produce the highest yields with
minimal expenditure of energy and economic resources. Farming these soils normally results in
the least damage to the environment. The prime farm soils have been delineated on Map 2,
Existing Land Use.
1-69

To
CARTERET
White
O Co(tvr
J
(' '
l
`
The preparation of this map was financed in
17ss
,�. 'j ' its
River
part through a grant provided by the North
4 9 14 7 1 a
1
Carolina Coastal Management Program,
1443
through funds provided by the Coastal Zone
1434
1434
swANssoao
Management Act of 1972, as amended, which
tom_
142
143
is administered by the Office of Ocean and
73 3
13 a35
2
Coastal Resource Management, National
7
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
j
3
42
2
425
2
150
'
���
GOv
j
/ /
f 74 3 8
4 tso
8
SOIL LEGEND
i
J
61
/•
4 1
50
1 BAYMEADE-FORESTON STALLINGS: Nearly level and gently sloping, well
70
5
drained, and somewhat poorly drained soils that have a loamy subsoil; on
/•/
/
/
y37
1808
1654
8.y
uplands.
2 NORFOLK-GOLDSBOROONSLOW: Nearly level and gently sloping, well
7)
drained, moderately well drained, and somewhat poorly drained soils that
6
14 '' tiN
z
amy subsoil: on uplands
a IOWOOOINGTON-TORHUNTA:
/
324
3 RAINS -have
Nearly level, poorly drained and very
poorly drained soils that have a loamy or clayey
2
J
Q
subsoil; on uplands
/ J
/
W
4 LEON-MURVILLE-KUREB: Nearly level and gently sloping, poorly drained,
/•
very poorly drained, and excessively drained soils Ihat have a sandy subsoil
and underlying material, on uplands
130
O
O
5 MUCKALEE-DOROVAN: Nearly level, poorly drained soils that are loamy
1324
Air B
0
throughout and very poorly drained soils that are muck throughout: on
fk odplams
1303 310
am eu
rine p
e
=
.1307
1302
6 CROATAN: Nearly level, very poorly drained. mucky soils that are underlain
/ 00 311
by loamy material; on uplands
/ 13
7 BOHICKET-NEWHAN: Nearly level to steep, very Doody drained soils that
0
/
are underlain to clayey or sandy material and excessively drained soils that
O\\
1 308
3
are sandy throughout; in tidal marshes and on barrier dunes
7s
�p
H
1 3 i
3ACKSONVILLE
8 WANDO-AACTOLUS: Nearly level and gently sloping, excessively drained,
moderately well drained, and somewhat poorly drained soils that are sandy
/
2
New
lfj
throughout: on uplands and stream terraces
2
River
5
r
1300 US Hw
8 315
12
a
7
�
123
4 122
Marine Corp
1236 ?zs
Air Station
f
12 2
7243
at New River
Traps
Bay
_N _
1 227
,
0,3
249
215 7173
\ \. J 11 265
1214 1162 1 15
_
\• 1220
2 4 2
1 G
1
•\
O 2
218 ~
x E
e
1
s
116 1119
8
\
1
AIR
R
9
11 4
\12
121
109
\'\ 2
1 1
203
11
0
108
C Hw .
�
�j_ •\ C
V
107
NOR AIL BEACH
'
i
\ 1205
Q0
1207
1203
;
105 6
�ry
151 8
'
\
20.2
S 7
52
U
v
152
Z
06 GREATER SANDY RUN 6
15 8
1201
TRAINING AREA
15
\•\
jp4
151H
1531
A
Z
LEGEND
—
,
u
Z 3
to
CORPORATE LIMITS
1
�,^J
2"
�j
t'
/
IVj
J
OLLY
RIDGE
MUNICIPAL EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION
o
//nn
SURFCITY
- - -- ~
PENDICR COUNT
MAP 9
ONSLOW COUNTY
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
N�
y
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
O,
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
miles 1.70
NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE
O 1 4
NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE
SCALE
ONSLOW COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
GENERAL SOIL MAP

' 7. Manmade Hazards
Manmade hazards which will serve as obstacles to development in Onslow County include the
following:
Camp Davis Helicopter Outlying Fields
Marine Corps Air Station at New River
-- Camp Lejeune Military Base including the Sandy Run Firing Range
Albert Ellis Airport
Transport of hazardous materials via the railway
-- Industries generating/using hazardous materials and transporting via highway
-- The Old Pony Road Landfill
There are no energy generating plants located in Onslow County. The following provides a
description of the above -mentioned hazards.
a. Camp Davis Helicopter Outlying Fields (HOLF) - Immediately north of the Town of
Holly Ridge. A nine-year (1969-78) accident history reveals three accidents on
field and none off field. A typical day at this field involves approximately 100
operations. Utilized under lease agreement from International Paper Company
since the mid-1950s for helicopter pilot/crew training from MCAS New River.
' b. Marine Corps Air Station (Helicopter) (MCAS(H)) at New River - Aircraft operations
at MCAS(H) are presently limited to helicopter and light conventional aircraft and
are buffered by the Camp Lejeune complex. A nine-year (1969-78) accident
history shows 16 accidents within the military reservation and eight accidents off
base (one within five miles and seven beyond five miles). A typical day at this
station involves 739 operations.
Constraints to land use closely associated with aircraft operations include
' designated landing and clearance zones, and noise levels in the vicinity of Marine
Corps Air Station New River. Landing clearance zones are designated by
regulation for safety reasons. Because the majority of aircraft crashes occur during
' takeoffs and landings, the potential for aircraft crashes is highest within these
designated zones. The driver's training school at Montford Point road course is the
only training facility affected by Air Station New River aircraft noise at or above
' accepted levels of 65 LDN (day/night average noise). Future plans for any facilities
in the immediate area of Marine Corps Air Station New River will address the effect
of aircraft noise.
C. Camp Lejeune Military Base - Certain manmade features and operations on (and
near) the base are considered hazardous. Specialized areas such as the
ammunition supply point, hazardous waste sites, aircraft landing zones, firing
' range/impact areas (Sandy Run Firing Range), areas associated with excessive
noise, and roadways are hazardous.
' Safety distances are placed around existing hazardous areas by regulation. Three
areas, the primary ammunition supply point at French Creek, a storage area at
Courthouse Bay, and an ordnance area at Air Station New River are surrounded
by safety areas described as "Standard Explosive Safety Quantity Distances."

1
,
These setbacks at Camp Lejeune range from 100 to 1850 feet, based on the type
and amount of munitions in storage. Additionally, safety buffers are designated
along public roadways throughout the base, including state roads and federal
highways. Because of the safety implications, training facilities cannot be
constructed within these setback zones, and maneuver training also is subject to
limitation.
'
Former hazardous materials disposal sites present a highly localized constraint.
Resulting from a 1983 study, several sites were determined to warrant further
investigation under the Navy Installation Restoration Program. Follow-up
'
procedures have led to the initiation of cleanup action at two of these sites. There
is a total of 42 identified toxic waste sites on the Marine Base Property.
d. Albert Ellis Airport - With regularly scheduled commercial flights and approximately
30 general aviation small aircraft operations daily there is always the slight chance
of airplane crashes.
e. The Camp Lejeune Railroad Company and the CSX System - These railroads
operate within the county and occasionally transport hazardous commodities such
as LP gas tankers.
f. Industrial Hazards - There are two industries and three pesticide dealers ,
considered generators/users of hazardous materials. All types of hazardous
materials, including low-level radioactive wastes, are transported through the
county. Highways 172, 24, and 17 are used extensively by the military for the
transportation of hazardous materials to and from the port facility at Morehead City
and Wilmington.
g. The Old Pony Road Landfill - This landfill was closed on December 31, 1997. The
landfill will remain a hazardous site. On January 2, 1998, the county opened its
Subtitle "D" (lined) landfill to the north of the closed facility. ,
8. Slopes in Excess of 12%
In Onslow County, slopes in excess of 12% are rare. Such slopes are only found along the high
riverfront areas along the New and White Oak Rivers. Excessive slope is not an obstacle to
development in Onslow County.
9. Areas of Resource Potential '
a. Agricultural and Forestlands
Onslow County has extensive agricultural and forestlands. Both are an important part of
the natural resources supporting the county's economy. The most productive farmland and ,
commercial forests are located in the northern areas of the county. Those areas best suited for
agricultural production are located on Map 2, Existing Land Use.
Most soils in Onslow county may be productive for agricultural usage if properly drained. i
However, "404" wetlands regulations prohibit or severely restrict the drainage of most areas. To
the maximum extent possible, Onslow County's agricultural and forest resources should be
1-72

developed as extremely important economic resources. State and federal regulations should
minimize obstacles to utilization of these resources. Onslow County supports the exemption of
"non-splashable" wetlands from "404" regulatory protection. (Note: This opinion is less restrictive
than current standards and this local opinion cannot preempt federal regulations).
' Approximately 43% of Onslow County is considered prime farmland. This farmland occurs
throughout the county on uplands and stream terraces mainly in areas near major drainage ways.
In some parts of the county, prime farmland has been converted to urban uses. The loss of prime
' farmland puts pressure on marginal lands, which generally are either wet, more erodible, droughts,
difficult to cultivate, or less productive than prime farmland.
Forestry is a valuable component of the county's economy as evidenced by the fact that
approximately 204,000 acres of the county's area of full regulatory jurisdiction (excluding Camp
Lejeune and Hofmann Forest) are forested. Timber companies such as I.P. Timberlands, Federal
Paper Board, and Weyerhauser Company, own and manage approximately 93,000 acres in the
county.
b. Valuable Mineral Resources
Two rock quarries are located within Onslow County. Martin Marietta Aggregates near
Belgrade and Martin Marietta Materials Onslow Quarry off Union Chapel Road both produce
' crushed marl limestone. There are no other known valuable mineral resources located in Onslow
County.
C. Public Forests
Onslow County contains extensive public forest lands. The Hofmann State Forest in
northern Onslow County contains approximately 54,000 acres within the county. Excellent
opportunities exist for camping, hiking, and hunting. In addition, the forest contains the White Oak
Pocosin. A pocosin is generally defined as a swamp located in an upland coastal region and
' unique to the southeastern United States.
d. Public Gamelands
Other than the Hofmann State Forest, there are no public gamelands located in Onslow
County.
re. Public Parks
The only major public park located in Onslow County which has regional significance
extending beyond Onslow County is the Hammocks Beach State Park which is located on the
coast in northeast Onslow County.
' f. Private Wildlife Sanctuaries
' There are no regionally or locally significant private wildlife sanctuaries located in Onslow
County. However, there are numerous private hunting clubs located in the county.
1 1-73

g. Marine Resources/Stormwater Runoff I
Onslow County contains valuable marine resource areas. The most significant are the
primary nursery areas. Due to map scale and the fact that the primary nursery areas within
Onslow County are extensive and scattered, these areas have not been mapped in this plan.
However, the nursery areas are primarily concentrated in the waters of the Stump Sound,
including Kings, Turkey, and Mill Creeks, and in the estuarine waters near the New River Inlet.
,
The remainder of the primary nursery areas in the county are scattered along the various creeks
located on the west side of the New River and in the creeks emptying into the Intracoastal
Waterway between the New River Inlet and Swamp Creek. The primary nursery areas are defined
as follows: Primary nursery areas are those areas in the estuarine system where initial post -larval
development takes place. These areas are usually located in the uppermost sections of a system
where populations are uniformly very early juveniles. The North Carolina Fisheries Rules of
Coastal Waters published by the NC Division of Marine Fisheries provides the location of primary
and secondary nursery areas.
The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), Division
of Water Quality assigns water quality classifications to all waters of the State of North Carolina.
The classifications are based upon the existing or contemplated best usage of the various streams
and segments of streams within a basin, as determined through studies, evaluations, and
comments received at public hearings. The classifications for tidal salt waters are as follows:
"SB"
'
Class SA: shellfishing for market purposes and any other usage specified by the
and "SC" classification;
Class SB: recreation and any other usage specified by the "SC"
r
primary classification;
Class SC: fish and wildlife propagation, secondary recreation, and other uses
requiring waters of low quality;
Class C: aquatic life propagation and survival, secondary recreation, and agriculture.
'
Most of the waters within Onslow CountY 's planningjurisdiction are classified SA.
Exceptions include Kings Creek, the New River from a line connecting Gray and Weil Points
extending north into the waters included in the City of Jacksonville's planning jurisdiction, and a
small portion of the White Oak River just south of Swansboro. These areas are classified as SC
waters. It should be noted that the DEHNR Division of Marine Fisheries, the North Carolina
Coastal Federation, and the Onslow County Board of Commissioners have requested that the SC
waters of the White Oak and New Rivers be reclassified to SA. However, to date, the Division of
Water Quality has not granted this request. Map 10 provides a general location of the water
quality classes for Onslow County and a general location of the areas closed to shellfishing.
I n addition, surface waters (streams, lakes, or estuaries) are rated as either fully supporting
(S), support -threatened (ST), partially supporting (PS), or nonsupporting (NS) by the Division of
'
Water Quality. The terms refer to whether the classified uses of the water (such as water supply,
aquatic life protection, and swimming) are being fully supported, partially supported, or are not
supported. For instance, saltwaters classified for commercial shellfish harvesting (SA) would be
rated as fully supporting if bacterial levels in the water were low enough to allow harvesting.
However, if fecal coliform bacteria levels were too high to allow shellfish to be harvested, but not
too high to prevent swimming, then the waters would be rated as partially supporting since they
'
1-74

only support the swimming. If the waters were impacted to the point that even swimming was
disallowed, the waters would be rated as nonsupporting. The support -threatened and partially
supporting waters are generally delineated on Map 10.
Nutrients and algal growth are a significant concern primarily in the New River drainage,
much of which was designated as nutrient sensitive waters (NSW) in 1991. The remainder of the
basin does not have notable problems with eutrophication.
Point source discharges contribute the majority of the nutrients to the New River. Point
sources account for 59% of the phosphorus load to the NSW area and 44% of the nitrogen load.
In the past, over 94% of point source inputs of both nutrients originated from the Jacksonville
WWTP and Camp Lejeune facilities.
However, these major dischargers to the New River estuary are in the process of
undertaking major improvements or have removed their discharge entirely. The City of
Jacksonville has constructed a new land application WWTP which began operation in January,
1998. The new WWTP has a capacity of 6.0 mgd and is expandable to 9.0 mgd as the demand
for additional capacity presents itself. The land application site is located north of Pony Farm
Road just off U.S. 258 and occupies approximately 6,200 acres. This facility is the largest land
application site in the United States in terms of total land area. As a result, Jacksonville's
discharge has been removed from Wilson Bay, which has been one of the most degraded
waterbodies in the entire basin.
Camp Lejeune currently operates four facilities discharging into the New River at two
locations near Hadnot Point. However, the two discharges are being consolidated and a single
advanced treatment facility is being constructed at the site of the current Hadnot Point plant. The
plant is scheduled for completion by December, 1998, and will operate under summer TP (total
phosphorus) and TN (total nitrogen) limits of 0.5 mg/I and 5.0 mg/1 respectively and winter limits
of 1.0 mg/I (TP) and 10.0 mg/I (TN). The new plant will represent a small increase in permitted
capacity over the total capacity of the existing plants (15 MGD vs. 13.2 MGD). However, the high
level of nutrient removal provided by this facility --coupled with the removal of the Jacksonville
discharge --will result in a substantial decrease in both phosphorus and nitrogen loads from current
levels. The New River nutrient sensitive waters are delineated on Map 10.
In 1989, the state Environmental Management Commission established High Quality and
Outstanding Resource water classifications. High quality waters were established in response to
federal antidegradation regulations which require that the quality of waters with quality higher than
that defined by the state's existing classification standards be maintained through additional
protective measures. The General Procedures Rule and Antidegradation Policy are defined by
15A NCAC 2B.0101 and 15A NCAC 2B.0201, respectively. Stricter requirements for water quality
standards, wastewater treatment, and stormwater runoff control will apply to high quality water
designated areas. The standards are defined in 15A NCAC 2B.0201. Within Onslow County, only
Kings Creek is nominated as a high quality water area.
Outstanding Resource Waters were designated because they were considered to be
significant marine resource areas having relatively clean and pristine waters, and having
significant value as recreational and natural resource areas. Two primary areas of Onslow County
were designated: (1) Stump Sound, and (2) Bear Island and vicinity. Special development
controls may be imposed in each area. These controls include, but are not necessarily limited to,
increasing the estuarine shoreline width to 575 feet. In addition, within estuarine shorelines
1-75

contiguous to waters classified as ORW, all development projects, proposals, and designs shall
limit the built upon area to no more than 25 percent of the AEC area of the land to be developed
or any lower site specific percentage as adopted by the Environmental Management Commission
as necessary to protect the exceptional water quality and outstanding resource values of the
ORW, and shall:
(A) have no stormwater collection system;
(B) provide a buffer zone of at least 30 feet from the mean high water line;
(C) otherwise be consistent with the use standards set out in 15A NCAC 7H.0209(e)
use standards.
The Outstanding Resource and High Quality Waters areas are shown on Map 8, Areas of
Environmental Concern and Other Fragile Areas.
h. Aquaculture
As defined under NC General Statute 106-758, aquaculture is the propagation and rearing
of aquatic species in controlled or selected environments, including, but not limited to ocean
ranching. Aquaculture has not been a significant issue within Onslow County's planning
jurisdiction.
II1:3

To
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
PRIMARY NURSERY AREAS - DUE TO MAP SCALE AND THE FACT
THAT THE PRIMARY NURSERY AREAS WITHIN ONSLOW COUNTY r
ARE EXTENSIVE AND SCATTERED, THESE AREAS HAVE NOT BEEN
MAPPED IN THIS PLAN. HOWEVER, THE NURSERY AREAS ARE
PRIMARILY CONCENTRATED IN THE WATERS OF THE STUMP
SOUND, INCLUDING KINGS, TURKEY, AND MILL CREEKS, AND IN
THE ESTUARINE WATERS NEAR THE NEW RIVER INLET. THE r,
REMAINDER OF THE PRIMARY NURSERY AREAS IN THE COUNTY r
ARE SCATTERED ALONG THE VARIOUS CREEKS LOCATED ON THE 1333
WEST SIDE OF THE NEW RIVER AND IN THE CREEKS EMPTYING
INTO THE INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN THE NEW RIVER
INLET AND SWAMP CREEK. J'133
13104 �
130
I 1324
/
�0R1303 310 1307
1302
/ 311
130
� 7
0 / 1308 It
1410
1805
1411
324
1/ .❖.
f'3
123
1236
=
.;c.
�
•
_
•❖i
��62
e
•
122
•
12
1
.
_� •
LEGEND
CORPORATE LIMITS
MUNICIPAL EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION
aY,♦4,. I�'C`ew♦ jai
NUTRIENT SENSITIVE WATER
SA - CLASS SA WATERS
SC - CLASS SC WATERS
ST - SUPPORT -THREATENED WATERS*
PS - PARTIALLY SUPPORTING WATERS*
CS - AREAS CLOSED TO SHELLFISHING*
*NOTE: THESE AREAS ARE ONLY GENERALLY DELINEATED ON THIS MAP
WATERSHED BOUNDARY LINE
INI7
T ,
v7'tif' Marine Corp
it Station
New River
Greater Sandy Run Training Area
SA
1201 IN,151g
0 11
s
Co
i
pFNDFq COVNTy
CS
NORTH
T8
1544
f-1545
V 531
r1 534
fA
rgs Crook S
Y RIDGE
K 6URF GI
The preparation of this map was financed in part through
a grant provided by the North Carolina Coastal
Management Program, through funds provided by the
Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended,
which is administered by the Office of Ocean and Coastal
Resource Management, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.
MAP 10
WATER QUALITY USE CLASSES
ONSLOW COUNTY
Miles 1-77
SCALE

I. DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINTS: PUBLIC FACILITIES
1. Water Supply
Onslow County operates the largest rural water delivery system in eastern North Carolina. The
water system was designed as a rural "potable" water system and was not intended to be utilized
in urbanized areas. Therefore, the pressure and volume for fire fighting and other emergency
uses is not maintained.
The water system serves over 90% of the county's unincorporated areas. According to the
county's Water and Sewer Department records in January, 1997, there were 28,132 customers
served by the water system. Approximately 73% of these customers were residential, 18% multi-
user (commercial majority), 5% municipal, and 4% private utilities. Map 11 provides the location
of Onslow County's water lines. These water lines range in size from 2 to 14 inches.
The system contains thirteen Black Creek Aquifer wells with a total capacity of 7,080 gallons per
minute (gpm). The following provides the system capacity by well. It should be noted that Well
#3 is not included in this table because it is no longer in operation.
Well #1 600 gallons per minute
Well #2 600 gallons per minute
Well #4 600 gallons per minute
Well #5 640 gallons per minute
Well #6 600 gallons per minute
Well #7 650 gallons per minute
Well #8 650 gallons per minute
Well #9 525 gallons per minute
Well #10 575 gallons per minute
' Well #11 560 gallons per minute
Well #12 530 gallons per minute
Well #13 400 gallons per minute
Well #14 150 gallons per minute
TOTAL 7,080 gallons per minute
Source: Onslow County Office of Director of Utilities.
Water storage is provided by seven elevated storage tanks and two ground storage tanks. These
tanks have a combined storage capacity of 9.15 million gallons. The following provides a
summary of storage capacity by tank:

Ma
CARTERET
�..�....Vr'�.:
�....�•..
�� h1�e
OVNTy
The preparation of this map was financed In
r"''
4,;
Ise 434
v
—•_._. Oe
��
River
part through a grant provided by the North
Program,
1
,7
a 43
sae 1aa3
Carolina Coastal Management
i
438 434
�P,
through funds provided by the Coastal Zone
—
1434
e/lHseDR
Management Act of 1972, as amended, which
f
142 436
143
8"
Is administered by the Office of Ocean and
133
Coastal Resource Management, National
430
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
j
142
7133
8„
iJ
a„ 425
s
=g"�1150
v��y
Go �•�
�
1423
1428
8"
J
IeB
603
4132"
8n 160
i'�
�•
�•
73l ��
1410 1808
ti
12"
1654
�•/
1411
11
�
7
Z
32 \ 1 „
s
Q
12"
ry
U
130
$r,
/
13
^
O
13 3 310 307
�
em B B n
1302 10"
/ 8" 00 311
IF
% 130
07
o 308
8"A
p %
�
RICHLANDS
O" 1317
/
�O7 %
30
314
Inc uLe
, New River
I
1300
SHw,2Nk
316
1/
i 1230
10„
123 a,•
221
224
12
1
i 23e
$1, 1
12 2
1 Y43
1i
' �D� Marine Corps Air Station
T88I
— _
221 12„
��
_0"
14„ at New River
i
. \•��
1230
8"
1248
T/ 216 4 1 '
py 265
14" 213 1 1110512152 "16
1
4f/
1220 ,219
113a 10 na 4
,218
176
`C1
°
121e
-BIRT
mA"r
1119 y
1
\`
.�
1209
210
203
121 111 109 12
1210
\
120
\
toe
�> 12"
O \
G
107
12„
N rH
\
Al,�C `•�
1205
1207\
8' 61B
G��
203 105
?02 GREATER SANDY RUN
r 162
2<.
`
10B TRAINING AREA
81644 `
\
\ g 1104
618
1645 T
15 1
LEND
534
CORPORATE LIMITS
3_
11
, `
`
tl RIDGE
MUNICIPAL EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION
r ` ,
1 suRrcl
, _
PENOER CoUNTy
WATER LINES
-------.
3
Note: Water lines that do not
o
have a dimension specification
range in size from 2" to 6" inches
MAP 11
WATER SYSTEM
ONSLOW COUNTY
miles
4 I ? ? 4
SCAL[ 1-79

P—j
� I
n
1
I
Uniflyte Tank
250,000 gallons
Hubert Tank
300,000 gallons
Pumpkin Center Tank
750,000 gallons
Gum Branch Tank
300,000 gallons
Catherine Lake Tank
300,000 gallons
Southwest Tank
500,000 gallons
Sneads Ferry Tank*
750,000 gallons
Dixon WTP Storage**
3,000,000 gallons
Hubert WTP Storage** 3,000,000 gallons
TOTAL 9,150,000 gallons
*This elevated storage tank serves the portion of Onslow County that includes North Topsail Beach.
**These ground storage tanks are located at each of the county's wastewater treatment plants. These tanks
have been in operation since April, 1996.
Source: Onslow County Office of Director of Utilities.
The county's water supply is drawn from the Cretaceous Middle Sand and Castle Hayne Aquifers.
These aquifers are also used extensively by various municipalities and industries within the central
coastal plain. Excessive concentrated pumpage may reduce the productivity of the aquifers and
could lead to salt water intrusion. Although the county has not experienced any significant water
shortages, a close monitoring of both pumping quantity and water quality will be continued to
protect the productivity of the aquifer.
Onslow County operates two separate water treatment plants. These plants have been operating
since April, 1996, and are each rated at 2 million gallons of treated water per day. In addition,
these plants each have the capability to expand to 6 million gallons of treated water per day.
Water system improvements associated with the construction of these plants have increased the
total system pumping capacity to 11.6 million gallons per day (MGD) or 8,023 gallons per minute
(GPM). During the calendar year of 1996, the Onslow County Water Department's pumping
average was 5.6 MGD.
An evaluation of the county's capacity to provide water supply to accommodate future growth is
provided on page 11-10.
2. Wastewater Treatment and Disposal
Onslow County does not maintain, own or operate any regional wastewater treatment or disposal
facilities. However, the county does own and operate several package treatment plants which
serve public facilities and subdivisions. The City of Jacksonville and the Towns of Richlands, Holly
Ridge, and Swansboro operate systems within their corporate limits with limited extensions into
unincorporated areas.
Anyone who discharges into the surface waters of the state must have a National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The issuance of an NPDES permit follows the
requirements contained in NCAC 15A 2H.0100. An application for a permit must be made to the
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) to obtain or renew an NPDES permit. Table 32 provides a
summary of NPDES permits issued in 1996 for facilities located in Onslow County.
WX

Table 32
Onslow County
NPDES Permits
DWQ
Expiry
Facility Name
Permit #
Flows to Stream:
Sub -basin
Year
A-1 Cleaner Inc.
NC0002585
Brinson Creek/White Oak River
30502
1997
Aragona Brothers Inc. -
NCO051853
UT Brinson Creek/White Oak River
30502
1997
Plant #1
Atlantis Mobile Home
NCO034339
UT Hicks Run/White Oak River Basin
30502
1997
Park
B.F. Millis & Sons
NC0007633
Wheeler Creek/White Oak River
30502
1997
Seafood
Bayshore Marina & Rac.
NCO084123
Chadwick Bay/White Oak River Basin
30502
1997
Club
Beachams Apt #1
NCO028223
UT Brinson Creek/White Oak River
30502
1997
Beachams Apt #2
NCO028215
UT Brinson Creek/White Oak River
30502
1997
Big Pines Mobile Home
NCO051471
UT Wallace Creek/White Oak River
30502
1997
Park
Blue Creek Utilities, Inc.
NCO056952
Blue Creek/White Oak River Basin
30502
1997
Coastal Carolina Comm.
NCO071536
Northeast Creek/White Oak River
30502
1997
College
CWB Utilities, Inc.
NCO058874
UT Wallace Creek/White Oak River
30502
1997
Hewitt's Mobile Home
NCO030431
UT Bell Swamp/White Oak River
30501
1997
Park
Hinson Arms Apartments
NCO071706
UT New River/White Oak River Basin
30502
1997
Holly Ridge WWTP;
NCO025895
UT Kings Creek/Cape Fear River
30624
1996
Town of
Horse Creek Farms
NCO062359
UT Little N.E. Creek/White Oak River
30502
1997
Utilities Co.
Basin
Jacksonville -Wilson Bay
NCO024121
Wilson Bay -New River/White Oak
30502
1998
WWTP
River
Mercer Env Corp -
NCO032239
Northeast Creek/White Oak River
30502
1997
Regalwood Sub.
Mercer Env Corp - White
NCO031577
Northeast Creek/White Oak River
30502
1996
Oak Est.
Onslow Co. Sch-Morton
NCO043711
Little Northeast Creek/White Oak River
30502
1997
Elem
Onslow Co. Sch-
NCO050849
Calebs Creek/White Oak River Basin
30501
1997
Silverdale Elem
Onslow Co. Sch-
NCO043672
Starkey's Creek/White Oak River
30501
1997
Tabernacle Elem
ME

n
I
Table 32 (continued)
DWQ
Expiry
Facility Name
Permit #
Flows to Stream:
Sub -basin
Year
Onslow County-Kenwood
NC0030813
Southwest Creek/White Oak River
30502
1997
Homes
Onslow County -Water
NC0083321
Queen Creek/White Oak River Basin
30501
1997
Dept.
Onslow County Water
NC0083551
UT Stones Creek/White Oak River
30502
1997
Dept.
Rexxon; Ltd. -Jacksonville
NC0036676
UT Rocky Run/White Oak River Basin
30502
1997
Site
Richlands WWTP;
NC0023230
Squires Run/White Oak River Basin
30502
1997
Town of
Rock Creek
NC0062294
New River/White Oak River Basin
30502
1997
Environmental Co.
Scientific Water and
NC0036226
New River/White Oak River Basin
30502
1997
Sewer Inc.
Sentry Utilities -Hickory
NC0034991
Little NE Creek/White Oak River
30502
1997
Grove
Sentry Utilities-
NC0057053
Brinson Creek/White Oak River
30502
1997
Springdale Ac
Sherwood Mobile Home
NC0022462
UT Mott Creek/White Oak River
30502
1997
Park Asso.
Swansboro WWTP,
NC0036153
Foster Creek/White Oak River Basin
30501
1997
Town of
Thorne Apple
NC0007757
UT Juniper Swamp/Cape Fear River
30623
1996
Valley/Carolina Dv
USMC MCB-CL Camp
NC0062995
New River/White Oak River Basin
30502
1996
Geiger WWrP
USMC MCB-CL Camp
NC0063011
Northeast Creek/White Oak River
30502
1996
Johnson WWTP
USMC MCB-CL
NC0063045
New River/White Oak River Basin
30502
1996
Courthouse Bay WWTP
USMC MCB-CL Hadnot
NC0063029
New River/White Oak River Basin
30502
1997
Point WWTP
USMC MCB-CL Onslow
NC0078328
UT Gillets Creek/White Oak River
30502
1997
Beach WTP
USMC MCB-CL Onslow
NC0063053
Intracoastal Waterway/White Oak
30502
1996
Beach WWTP
River
USMC MCB-CL Rifle
NC0063037
New River/White Oak River Basin
30502
1996
Range WWTP
USMC MCB-CL Tarawa
NC0063002
Northeast Creek/White Oak River
30502
1996
Terrace WWTP
1-82

DWQ Expiry
Facility Name Permit # Flows to Stream: Sub -basin Year
Viking Utilities Co., Inc. NCO049387 Mott Creek/White Oak River Basin 30502 1997
'
Webb Apartments NCO023825 Little Northeast Creek/White Oak River 30502 1997
Webb Creek Water & NCO062642 Wallace Creek/White Oak River 30502 1997
Sewage, Inc.
Weston/ABC Cleaners NCO084395 Northeast Creek/White Oak River 30502 1997
Source: NC DENR Division of Water Quality, July 1996.
,
Due to the lack of a regional sewer system wastewater disposal in Onslow County is primarily
handled through the utilization of conventional septic systems. The limitations of septic tank use
and their inclination for failure in Onslow County has been well documented. However, based on
the State's rules and regulations for determining septic tank suitability, 13% of all septic tank
,
permits are denied by the Onslow County Health Department.
The proliferation of septic tank usage and the lack of county -wide sewer continues to be a
significant issue facing Onslow County. Although there has been some efforts to establish
regional sewer in the Southwest Creek and Piney Green areas, none have been successful. The
county's present efforts to establish a regional sewer system will be discussed in Section II of this ,
document.
3. Solid Waste Disposal ,
Onslow County operates the refuse drop-off sites listed below. A private contractor is responsible
for pickup and transport of solid waste from the drop-off sites to the county's landfill. Other private
solid waste contractors provide curbside collection service for businesses and private residences.
However, most of the residential solid waste is delivered to the collection sites by individuals.
LANDFILL SITE
415 Meadowview Road
Monday - Saturday 6:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. I
*61Z :01N1:1141101*94a=
Centers open 7 days a week '
Monday - Saturday 8:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. Sunday 1:00 p.m. - 6:00 p.m.
Swansboro - located on Swansboro Loop Road
Catherine Lake - located on Bannerman Mill Road about Y2 mile off Hwy 111
Folkstone - located on Old Folkstone Road about 1 mile east of Hwy 17
Midway Park - located behind Piney Green Volunteer Fire Station '
Verona - located on Dawson Cabin Road about 1/4 mile east of Puller Hall Pistol Range
CONVENIENCE CENTERS ,
Centers open 1 day a week
1:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m.
Monday: Hubert - located on Hubert Boulevard about 'h mile east of Hubert Fire Station '
I-83 ,

I
11
17
fl
Tuesday: Belgrade - located on Mattocks Road about 1 'h miles east of Spring Hill Crossing
Wednesday: Richlands - located on Cavanaughtown Road about 1 Y2 miles north of Comfort
Highway
Thursday: Nine Mile - located on Nine Mile about 1 'h miles west of Hwy 53
Friday: Ramsey - located on Ramsey Road about 5 miles east of Gum Branch Road
Saturday: Silverdale - located on Belgrade Hwy about 1/4 mile north of Silverdale School
Prior to December 3, 1997, solid waste generated in Onslow County was transported to the
Onslow County landfill located on Pony Farm Road. However, the permit for this facility expired
in December, 1997. As a result, a new landfill was constructed on a 170-acre site located just
north of the original Pony Farm Road Landfill. Groundbreaking for this new facility began in
October, 1997, and was completed in January, 1998, with appropriate buffers. The new landfill
is a Subtitle D (liner/leach) facility capable of accommodating Onslow County's solid waste
demands through the year 2028. The county is confident that this life expectancy estimate is
realistic and plans to increase recycling efforts with the intention of keeping the growth rate of the
county's waste stream below that of its population.
4. Education Facilities
The Onslow County school system serves the entire county and during school year 1998-1999
will include thirty-two (32) schools: seven high schools (including Onslow County Learning Center),
eight middle schools, and seventeen elementary schools (including Queens Creek and Sand
Ridge). Table .33 indicates that the overall enrollment at these schools increased by 1,797
individuals or by 9.2% during the eight -year period between school years 1990-1991 and 1998-
1999.
Table 33
Onslow County Schools
1990-1991 to 1998-1999
Grade
Second Month
Projected
+/- since
Level
1990-91
1998-99
1990-91
PUBLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
Bell Fork Elementary
K-5
943
549
-394
Blue Creek Elementary
K-5
1,031
683
-348
Clyde Erwin Elementary
K-5
772
495
-277
Dixon Elementary
K-5
942
700
-242
Hunters Creek Elementary
K-5
[A]
712
+712
Jacksonville Commons
K-5
[A]
798
+798
Morton Elementary
K-4
820
531
-289
Northwoods Elementary
K-5
657
502
-155
Parkwood Elementary
K-5
615
506
-109
Queens Creek Elementary
K-5
[A]
500
+500
Richlands Elementary
K-5
989
1,019
+30
Sand Ridge Elementary
K-5
[A]
514
+514
Silverdale Elementary
K-4
479
405
-74
1-84

Table 33 (continued)
Grade
Second Month
Projected
+/- since
'
Level
1990-91
1998-99
1990-91
Southwest Elementary
K-5
[A]
891
+891
Summersill Elementary
K-5
869
748
-121
'
Swansboro Elementary
3-5
485
442
-43
Swansboro Primary
K-2
582
[B]
-582
Tabernacle 5th
5
708
[B]
-708
Walter M. Thompson
K-5
629
381
-248
Elementary
,
Elementary (Subtotal)
10,521
10,376
-145
PUBLIC SECONDARY SCHOOLS
Dixon Middle
6-8
681
411
-270
,
Dixon High
9-12
693
514
-179
Hunters Creek Middle
6-8
780
745
-35
'
Jacksonville Commons Middle
6-8
[A]
753
+753
Jacksonville High
9-12
1,534
1,902
+368
Jacksonville/New Bridge Middle
6-8
699
481
-218
Northwoods Park Middle
Onslow County High
6-8
9-12
865
54
737
[B]
-128
-54
,
Onslow County Learning
9-12
[A]
40
+40
Center (OCLC)
Richlands High
9-12
563
783
+220
Southwest Middle
6-8
425
624
+199
Southwest High
9-12
524
736
+212
'
Swansboro Middle
6-8
398
631
+233
Swansboro High
9-12
502
902
+400
Trexler Middle
6-8
470
526
+56
White Oak High School
Secondary
9-12
870
9,112
1,269
11.054
+499
'
(Subtotal)
+1,942
TOTAL
19,633
21,430
+1,797
[A] - Schools opened since 1991.
,
[B] - School closed since 1991.
Source: Onslow County Schools.
'
The growth of enrollment in the county's secondary schools greatly exceeded that of elementary ,
schools, which actually decreased, between school years 1990-1991 and 1998-1999. This trend
indicates an aging school aged population. As a result, the demand for additional classroom
space is greater at the middle and high school grade levels than at the elementary grade levels. '
I-85 ,

I
1
1
�l
Since 1991, five additional Onslow County schools have opened serving Jacksonville residents.
These include the Jacksonville Commons Elementary; Southwest Elementary, Onslow County
Learning Center (OCLC), Hunters Creek Elementary, and Jacksonville Commons Middle School.
Hunters Creek Elementary and Jacksonville Commons Middle are the county's newest schools
which opened for the school year 1997-1998. However, two new elementary schools, Queens
Creek and Sand Ridge will be opening for the school year 1998-1999. Numerous additions and
renovations have also taken place at all of the existing schools serving Jacksonville.
The county's school construction and improvement plans will be discussed further in Section II of
this document. Map 13 provides the location of schools operated by Onslow County.
The Camp Lejeune School District is a federally funded Section 6 school system which serves the
children of military families who reside on the base. Table 34 shows the December, 1996,
enrollment figures for the six elementary schools, the middle school, and the high school that
make up the Camp Lejeune School District. Total enrollment at these schools decreased by 163
individuals or 4.3% for the six -year period.
School enrollment in the Camp Lejeune School District is directly related to developments at the
military base. For example, school enrollment was at a record high during the Vietnam War but
has since stabilized to its current levels. Projecting school enrollment is made even more difficult
due to the fact that there is usually an annual turnover of 25 to 35% among military families
stationed at Camp Lejeune.
Table 34
Camp Lejeune School District
Enrollment for December 31, 1996 and September 28, 1990
School
1990
Grade
Level
Enrollment
9/28/90
Present
Grade
Level
Enrollment
12/31/96
+/- since
9/28/90
Berkeley Manor Elementary School
K-5
485
PK-5
360
-125
Delalio Elementary School
K-5
428
PK-5
330
-98
Russell Elementary School
K-5
412
PK-5
420
+8
Stone Street Elementary School
K-5
476
PK-5
430
-46
Tarawa Terrace I Elem. School
K-4
367
K-3
400
+33
Tarawa Terrace II Elem. School
K-5
407
K-5
530
+123
Preschool for the Handicapped
Preschool
17
N/A'
N/A'
-17
Elementary School Subtotal
2,592
2,470
-122
Brewster Middle School
6-8
723
6-8
650
-73
Lejeune High School
9-12
518
9-12
550
+32
Secondary School Subtotal
1.241
1,200
-41
Total Enrollment
3,833
3,670
-163
The Preschool for the Handicapped has closed and its students distributed throughout the Camp Lejeune
School District.
Source: Camp Lejeune School District.
The ability of the schools to accommodate population growth demands during the planning period
is discussed on page II-12.

5. Recreation 1
The Onslow County Parks and Recreation Department is staffed with a full-time director,
administrative secretary, recreation supervisor, two assistant recreation supervisors, park ranger,
assistant park ranger, park superintendent, maintenance supervisor, and four maintenance
workers. In addition to these full-time employees, the Parks and Recreation Department may have '
up to twenty-five part-time employees at any one time. Part-time employees serve as park
attendants, day camp assistants, and district athletic coordinators.
As a shoreline county located in a mild climate, Onslow County offers a variety of recreational
activities such as hiking, bicycling, hunting, swimming, boating, water skiing, and fishing. Hofmann
State Forest, Hammocks Beach State Park, and the public beaches located in North Topsail
Beach provide an abundance of open space for public recreation. '
The county's Parks and Recreation Department maintains four regional beach access sites in
North Topsail Beach. The following provides a description of these sites. ,
No. 1 - Located on SR 1568, just past the New River Fishing Pier at North Topsail Beach.
Features a ramp and walkway to the ocean (accessible to the handicapped), restrooms,
showers, and a gravel parking lot for 66 vehicles on approximately 1 acre.
No. 2 - Located on NC 210 four miles southeast of the North Topsail Beach high-rise
bridge. Features an elevated wooden pavilion, an observation deck on the oceanfront,
'
restrooms, showers and gravel parking lots for 290 vehicles on approximately four (4)
acres. Also includes a Nature Trail, which features a platform overlooking the sound,
picnic tables, and benches in a wetlands environment.
'
No. 3 - Located past the St. Regis Hotel at the mouth of the New River at North Topsail
Beach. This area has traditionally been a favorite place for surf fishing. The park has 700
ft. frontage facing New River Inlet.
'
No. 4 - This facility opened in 1992 and is located on SR 1568 approximately one mile from
NC 210. It is the county's newest beach access site and features an elevated wooden
'
observation deck on the ocean, a ramp to the beach for the handicapped, restrooms,
showers, concession area and parking for 173 vehicles. Phase II expansion on the sound
side of SR 1568 will add additional amenities to the 13-acre site.
'
Onslow County also maintains 13 shoreline access facilities in North Topsail Beach. These
access sites begin at Second Avenue and extend south through Reeves Street.
'
It should be noted that all four of the regional beach facilities and the 13 shoreline access sites
sustained extensive damage during Hurricanes Bertha and Fran. The reconstruction of these
facilities is a recreational priority for both Onslow County and the Town of North Topsail Beach.
In addition to the four beach access sites, Onslow County maintains three developed district parks,
which combined occupy approximately 148 acres. In addition, the county recently acquired
'
approximately 195 acres for the development of the Richlands/Steed Park. The following provides
a description of the facilities at each of the county's developed parks:
'
Hubert By -Pass Park - This park is a 41-acre predominantly passive park located off Highway 24,
approximately six miles east of Jacksonville. Facilities include:
• 3/4-mile jogging/fitness trail.
'
I-87
,

1
'
'/z-mile
•
nature trail with 27 interpretive stations.
•
Two large open picnic areas and a picnic pavilion with grills and tables.
•
Tot -lot, consisting of %-acre multipurpose play area with swings, merry-go-round,
'
teeter -totter, and sandbox.
•
Paved basketball court.
'
•
•
Sand volleyball court.
Senior Citizens' area with pavilion and pig -cooking area.
Onslow Pines
Park - This park is a 55-acre park located approximately 3 miles south of
Jacksonville, on Onslow Pines Road. Facilities include:
•
Department Administrative Office.
•
Multi -purpose outdoor arena.
•
Senior Citizens' outdoor recreation area.
•
Four lighted tennis courts.
•
Two lighted regulation -sized basketball courts.
'
•
Combination baseball/softball/football/soccer field.
•
Little League baseball field.
'
•
•
Covered pavilion for picnics and meetings with pig -cooking areas.
Five designated picnic areas.
•
4/10-mile nature trail with 20 interpretive stations.
•
Tot -lot area with numerous pieces of playground equipment.
•
Two sand volleyball courts.
•
Jogging -Fitness trail.
Stump Sound Park - This park opened in 1993 and is the county's newest park. It is a 56-acre
semi -passive park located on NC Highway 172 approximately one mile west of Highway 210.
Facilities include:
• 1,590 ft. nature trail with 17 interpretive stations.
• Tot -lot area with playground equipment.
• Picnic pavilion with restrooms.
• Paved basketball court.
• Sand volleyball court.
• Open space.
• Two tennis courts.
• Two baseball/softball fields
• Two soccer/football fields
• 1,785 ft. fitness trail.
• Pig -cooking area.
New River Waterfront Park - Although this park is located within the city limits of Jacksonville, it
is of significance to the county. This facility is a small 1-1/2 acre park, located across from the
U.S.O. at US 17 Business and New Bridge Street. This park was developed jointly by the City of
Jacksonville and Onslow County. Facilities include a boardwalk, boat access, a pier, and parking
facilities.
The location of the county's public beach access sites and parks have been provided on Map 13.
Onslow County does not own or maintain any marinas or dockages. However, there are several
commercial, and one residential, marinas located in the county. Generally, water oriented sources
of recreation are concentrated around these facilities. The following table provides a summary
of marinas and dockages located in Onslow County.
Im

Table 35
Onslow County
Marinas and Dockages
Ramp Repair Restroom Pumpout Fuel Liftout Restrnt Wet Slips Dry Stack Moorings
SWANSBORO
Commercial
Bulls Place
Yes
No
Yes
No
Diesel
No
Yes
7
Clyde Phillips
No
No
Yes
No
Diesel
No
Yes
4
Casper
No
Yes
Yes
No
Gas & Diesel
Yes
No
20 150 2
Shell Rock Landing
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
4
Theron Howard Davis
No
No
Yes
No
Diesel
No
No
Willis Boat Dockage
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
HUBERT
Commercial
Great Neck Landing
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
10
SNEADS FERRY
Commercial
B F Millis N Sons Sf
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Bowmans Seafood
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
15
L T Everett N Sons S
No
No
Yes
No
Gas & Diesel
No
No
New River Marina
Yes
No
Yes
No
Gas & Diesel
No
No
9
Old Ferry Marina
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
32 50
Sneads Ferry Fish N
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Sneads Ferry Marina
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
Swan Point Marina
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Gas & Diesel
Yes
No
50
Yopps Tackle Shop
Yes
No
Yes
No
Gas & Diesel
No
No
4
Residential
Bayshore Marina N Ra
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
70
Source: NC Division of Coastal Management.

11
In January, 1998, the update of the county's Recreation and Park Master Plan was completed by
the Department of Recreation and Leisure Studies at East Carolina University. The purpose of
this plan was to identify the park and recreation needs of Onslow County residents and to provide
the Parks and Recreation Department with a comprehensive guide for meeting those needs.
Following are the recommendations for parks and facilities development as included in the Master
Plan:
District Parks
1. One of two new district parks should be located on the northeastern side of Jacksonville
(near Deppe); there is no district park in that area of the county. This park should be the
largest of all parks (i.e., 300-400 acres).
2. A second district park should be located in the Swansboro area, which is the most rapidly
growing township in Onslow County. It is recommended that the present Hubert By -Pass
County Park be expanded if possible or a new district park developed in that area.
3. Finally, a third district park, Richlands/Steed County Park, was recently purchased by the
county, but remains undeveloped. It is located in the northwestern section of the county.
Development should begin immediately to meet the needs of county residents in that area.
Greenways
A greenway or linear park system is recommended. Greenways should provide active and
passive opportunities for recreation including, but not limited to:
Active
Passive
Bicycling
Bird Watching
Hiking
Nature Study
Horseback Riding
Photography
Jogging/Running
Relaxing
Walking
Sightseeing
It is recommended that a series of trails be developed, each with non -conflicting uses (e.g.,
walking and sightseeing). It should be noted that these systems of linear trails may also serve as
transportation routes (e.g., bicycling or walking). The location of these trails should be dispersed
throughout the county using existing streams, river corridors, abandoned railroad right-of-ways
(e.g., Seaboard Coastline Railroad), utility right-of-ways, and existing parks/trails.
Trail length will vary with use. It is recommended that walking and jogging trails be at least a
quarter of a mile in length. It is also recommended that before trail development begins, user
groups (e.g., joggers, hikers, bicyclists, horseback riders) be consulted for preferred length and
design.
.M

Water -Based Recreation Opportunities
There is a need for more water -based recreation opportunities. More specifically, it is
recommended that 2 outdoor swimming pools and 1 indoor swimming pool be constructed
(each containing 4,000 square feet of surface area and each having a capacity of 200,000
gallons). It is recommended that pools be located in and around the population center of
the county.
2. It is recommended that wheelchair access to the beach be provided at Beach Access
Areas 1 and 2 by construction of ramps between parking lots and beach areas.
Indoor Facilities
It is recommended that three recreation centers be built between (1) Richlands and Jacksonville,
(2) Stump Sound and Jacksonville, and (3) Swansboro and Jacksonville. Sizes and/or capacity
should minimally provide for the following recreation facilities:
Basketball Courts
Classrooms (for exercise, education, etc.)
Handball/Racquetball Courts
Shuffle Board Courts
Swimming Pool (at one of the three centers)
Walking/Jogging Trails
Weightrooms
6. Transportation
a. Roads
Onslow County is accessible to the coastal region and the Piedmont of North Carolina by
a well established highway system which includes U.S. Highways 17, 258, NC 53, and NC 24.
With the exception of NC 53, all of these thoroughfares are scheduled for improvements during
the planning period. Table 36 provides a summary of construction projects that are currently
underway based on information contained in the 1996 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP).
Cl
1
i�
1
1-91

Table 36
Onslow County
'
DOT Projects Currently Under Construction
LENGTH
(MI)
'
ROUTE/CITY
ID NO.
LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
(KM)
US 17
R-2405*
1-40 at Wilmington to east corporate limits of Holly
23.4
Ridge. Widen roadway to multi -lanes
37.7
US 17
R-2406*
East corporate limits of Holly Ridge to four lane
17.0
section south of Jacksonville. Four lane divided
27.4
facility with a bypass east of Verona.
NC 24
R-2105*
Swansboro to US 70 at Morehead City. Widen
19.4
roadway to multi -lanes.
31.2
Jacksonville
U-2107*
Jacksonville bypass, US 17 South to US 17 North.
4.4
Four lane divided facility on new location.
7.1
SR 1225
B-2157
Branch of New River. Replace bridge No. 49
—
Jacksonville
E-3406
NC 24 (Freedom Trail/Johnson Boulevard).
—
Intersection improvements for bicyclist safety.
I
1
0
Source: NCDOT Transportation Improvement Plan, 1996.
Map 12 outlines annual average daily traffic (ADT) counts compiled by the North Carolina
Department of Transportation for 1995 in Onslow County. Map 12 indicates that ADT volume on
NC 24 between Hubert and Kellumtown is the highest in the county. Traffic counts are also high
on US Highway 258 between Tar Landing and NC 111, NC 172 just north of its intersection with
NC 210, and US Highway 17 at the Pender County Line.
b. Rail System
The Seaboard rail line traversing the county along Highway U.S. 17 has been abandoned.
The Marine Corps has cognizance over a Department of Defense rail line extending from the
supply area at Camp Lejeune to Cherry Point. The Camp Lejeune rail line is used to move Marine
Corps Equipment between the Base and Morehead City and also handles the entire coal -fuel
supply. However, the tracks are in a poor state of repair and used on a limited basis. The rail is
authorized to operate as the Camp Lejeune Railroad Company with a system length of 40 miles
(in 1988).
C. Navigable Waters
The Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway traverses
protected channel for commercial and recreational
maintains the Waterway.
the county's coastal waters, providing a
interests. The Army Corp of Engineers
1
1-92

T°
w / v' mot. �'^•'�
C
.1
434
The preparation of this map was financed In
r'''+
'
1788
23W
't �.•�J'J��'r
part through a grant provided by the North
��'
14 s 437
Carollna Coastal Management Program,
430 a3a
through funds provided by the Coastal Zone
f;�
Management Act of 1972, as amended, which
+
142 435 143,
is administered by the Office of Ocean and
1�33 160
133
ISQ�
Coastal Resource Management, National
43e
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
6500 1a2
33
t
z 900
iJ.
_
425 \
Nay
1200
1423 1
�
J
800
413
j
r� 1410 1808
,
j �
1411
324
30
13 4
/1302 800 1303 310 307
am e
00 311
13 07
�0 i 13 13oe
1400
.
RICµANDS
30
1317
c ie
New /
314 i
Hw 1300 S Hw • 238 315
10300
+ 1230 A 6
221 , 224
123 800 t1 12�
122 4800
CARTERET
'o River
1601 (((
2 1443 1
1434 SWANS
2200
River
/ 123e
� 12 2 rv1 4100 Marine Corpa Alr Station
2I1
700 1243 1700 at Now River /
�•� �.�
\ 1230 1248 215 -111 4
v \♦
•j \, 12e5 1134 213 1 1 1105 35100 51
\\,1220 1218 121e 174 11 4 Gs
175
1218 f� AWlNT 1 11 ttte
•\•\ 1208 A""O"' 121 3/ 108 12
\•\ 1210 203 1000
lift
1210 t2o toe 6W "w
�Go \ 470 107 3
COG 1203 1100 1103
600 ?0? GREATER SANDY RUN
V
z TRAINING AREA
\ \, 201 S00 1 Oe S
\ 0 1104
U 16gp
LEGEND
CORPORATE LIMITS
MUNICIPAL EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION 0
pENDER COUNTy
• 84
Note: Average daily traffic count
figures are indicated in the larger
italicized typeface. The numbers
shown in the smaller font
represent state road numbers.
503
L
Z
W
U
0
W
wo
570W 0 O M TOP a ACM
1`
nh
7L
1518
152
15lO
1544
51B
Is I
RIDGEMAP 12
auff 1995
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC COUNTS
ONSLOW COUNTY
miles
SCALE
1-0

Id. Air Transportation
' The Albert Ellis Airport is located in western Onslow County off of State Road 111. This
facility occupies approximately 700 acres and is considered a primary commercial service airport.
The airport provides regularly scheduled commercial flights connecting to major hubs in the region.
' Air carrier service is provided by CCAir (US Air affiliate) and ASE Atlantic Southeast (Delta
affiliate). There are also charter and military operations at the airport. The airport has one
runway, 5/23 which is 7,100 feet long by 150 feet wide and has a grooved asphalt surface.
' Landside facilities including a 30,000 square foot terminal building, one conventional hangar, ten
T-hangar units, auto parking, and other support buildings.
' The following table provides a summary of airport activity at the Albert Ellis Airport for the years
1990 and 1995. This information has been taken directly from the North Carolina Airport System
Plan (NCASP).
1
Table 37
Albert Ellis Airport
Summary of Airport Activity
Airport/Activity 1990 1995'
Albert Ellis (Jacksonville)
Air Carrier Enplanements
Based Aircraft
Operations
Air Carrier Operations
General Aviation
Military
Airport Total
Peak Hour Operations
Instrument Approaches
Air Cargo Tonnage
98,342 125,474
30 30
8,400 10,000
22,000 22,000
8,000 8,000
38,400 40,000
13 14
5,800
25 29
'The data provided in the NCASP for the year 1995 was derived based on forecasts.
Source: North Carolina Airport System Plan.
' Continued maintenance and improvements at the Albert Ellis Airport is necessary to accommodate
increased activity. The airport plays a critical role in the success of the county's industrial
recruitment efforts. The airport has identified several improvement projects to be included in the
' NCDOT Division of Aviation Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Table 38 provides a list
of these projects including estimated costs. -
fl
1 1-94

Table 38
Albert J. Ellis Airport
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
STATUS
YEAR
TOTAL COST
Sanitary Sewer Line to County Facility
REQUEST
98
$750,000
Rehabilitate Maintenance Hangar Roof
REQUEST
98
$25,000
Access Road Pavement Marking
REQUEST
98
$4,000
Runway 5-23 Joint Sealing & Marking
REQUEST
98
$190,000
General Aviation Terminal
TIP (97)
99
$250,000
General Aviation Parking
TIP (97)
99
$88,100
Runway 23 Runup Apron
REQUEST
99
$350,000
T-Hangar Taxilane
REQUEST
00
$200,000
ARFF Vehicle
REQUEST
01
$500,000
Rehabilitate Runway 5-23
REQUEST
02
$1.590.000
Total
Source: Albert J. Ellis Airport.
$3,947,100
The following provides a description of each TIP project:
FISCAL YEAR 1998
Sanitary Sewer Line to County Facility: Existing airport sewer system is currently a septic system
which has not functioned properly due to the age of the system. The existing system will be
connected to a newly constructed waste treatment facility which will enhance the development
characteristics at the airport.
Rehabilitate Maintenance Hangar Roof: This project consists of the rehabilitation of the
maintenance hangar roof which has irreversibly moved beyond the limits of its usefulness.
Access Road Pavement Marking: This project consists of the sealing of the longitudinal joints on
the runway and repainting the runway markings.
FISCAL YEAR 1999
Runway 23 Runup Apron: This project consists of the construction of a runup apron and
associated lighting at the end of Runway 23. Commercial traffic is often delayed by general
aviation aircraft. This apron could allow aircraft to pass each other and make safer entries onto
the taxiway.
C
1-95

IFISCAL YEAR 2000
T-Hangar Taxilane: This project consists of the construction of a new T-hangar taxilane for the
new T-hangar.
FISCAL YEAR 2001
ARFF Vehicle: This project consists of a new aircraft rescue and fire fighting vehicle. By acquiring
this vehicle, the Albert J. Ellis Airport will be able to provide adequate fire protection for the
increasing number of operations.
FISCAL YEAR 2002
Rehabilitate Runway 5-23: The rehabilitation of the runway will be necessary to enable the larger
and heavier type aircraft to land and take off. The 7,100 foot by 150 foot runway will be
' overlayed with asphalt.
7. Other County Facilities/Services
The inventory of hospitals; clinics; health care facilities; police, fire, and emergency paramedic
facilities; and other institutional facilities has not changed appreciably in Onslow County since the
1991 Land Use Plan Update. The Onslow County Office of Emergency Management Services
is responsible for mitigation, preparedness, and respond/recovery operations for all forms of
' emergencies, disasters, or hazards that may offer threat to property or life.
Onslow County provides significant financial support for twenty (20) volunteer fire departments
' and eight (8) rescue volunteer squads. The systems of volunteer fire fighting and rescue
organizations in Onslow county is both efficient and effective in handling situations in the
unincorporated areas of the county. Although the volunteer fire departments and rescue squads
' are funded in part by Onslow County, these service organizations rely to a large extent on fund
raisers and state grants. Fund raisers such as dinners and yard sales are held annually.
' Since the county's land use plan was last updated in 1991, the majority of the county's volunteer
fire departments have reduced their Insurance Services Organization (ISO) ratings. This was
accomplished primarily through the purchase of additional equipment including air packs, large
diameter hose, and turnout gear; expansion of facilities to house equipment; and the installation
' of dry hydrants in portions of the county where there was inadequate hydrant coverage. A
comparison between 1992 and 1998 ISO ratings for the county's fire departments is provided in
Appendix I.
' Police protection is provided by the Onslow County Sheriffs Department which employs
approximately 132 people at present. Thirty-six are assigned to the jail and six people provide
' clerical support. There are three juvenile officers, a housekeeper, a sheriff, a colonel, and three
majors. In addition, there are eighty-four deputies involved with law enforcement activities. The
Sheriff's department coordinates and cooperates with military police.
' I-96

Since 1991, the communications division has separated from the Sheriff's Department and now '
makes up its own E-911 department employing twenty-one persons. The communications
department is expected to move into a new building at Jacksonville Commons by July, 1999. '
The locations of the county's 20 fire departments are shown on Map 13. Existing police, fire, and
emergency medical facilities and services are adequate to meet existing demand. '
Onslow Memorial Hospital, Camp Lejeune Naval Hospital, and Brynn Marr Behavioral Health Care
provide adequate major health care services for county residents. The Onslow County Health '
Department provides clinical and public health services to county residents. The county
departments of Environmental Health, Solid Waste, Mosquito and Animal Control contribute to the
county's public health effort through the control of health hazards, nuisances, and private
wastewater disposal systems. '
Other county facilities include court system facilities, the county jail, the social services building,
and county offices housing various departments such as the tax office, permit office, sheriffs ,
office, mental health, planning, and administration, all located in Jacksonville.
J
-7
L
1-97

The preparation of this map was financed In
part through a grant provided by the North
Carolina Coastal Management Program,
through funds provided by the Coastal Zone
Management Act of 1972, as amended, which
is administered by the Office of Ocean and
Coastal Resource Management, National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
5 j 1
r4 %
1302
j
j t
12 00
123
1230 1-1
�O
33
311
1308
13
314 i
3 N • 268 318
221 1224 122
12 2
221
230 249
26e
1220 Me
N.
. ALMR1
\ 121e VM
\ 1209
\• \ 1210 210
1
Oel
\
110 \•\ 1208
0f%
j ..1 CARTERET
434 r,—�ir." DO COunrr
5
i/ River
4 9 437 438 434 1442 1443
1434 ey" a
142 436 147
430
142
1162
1134 213 1 1106
121 174 1
175
i21 it " 109
108
0
New
River
Matins Corps Air Station
at New River
MPAU
105
GREATER SANDY RUN
TRAINING AREA
1104
LEGEND
CORPORATE LIMITS 1�' — ` - —•
MUNICIPAL EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION 10
--- PENDER Co-
FIRE/RESCUE STATIONS A
SCHOOL BUILDINGS
BEACH ACCESS SITES O
1. Beach Access Site No. 1
2. Beach Access Site No. 2
3. Beach Access Site No. 3
4. Beach Access Site No. 4
PARKS
1. Hubert By -Pass Park
2. Onslow Pines Park
3. Stump Sound Park
4. New River Waterfront Park
O
Ca)
NORTH 10 9
ate 4 Z
162 1629
�a"
6t8 is
6 1
MAP 13
W" Crtr
--'�" COMMUNITY FACILITIES
ONSLOW COUNTY
4 I miles }
•CAL■

1
SECTION II: PROJECTED LAND DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS
A. PROJECTED POPULATION GROWTH AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
1. General Discussion
In this section, recent trends in Onslow County's population and housing characteristics will be
utilized to project population growth and housing characteristics in the county. The continuing tide
of year-round migration into Onslow County is expected to have progressively greater impact on
land use issues throughout the next ten years.
As development continues near fragile areas, resource protection will assume greater significance
in the public eye. Continued development in areas within Onslow County's planning jurisdiction
will strain the capacity of the existing transportation system; increase demand for municipal or
county -supplied water and wastewater and solid waste disposal; and place increasing demands
' on schools, recreational facilities, law enforcement agencies, fire departments, and
administrative/regulatory agencies. Despite increased pressure to control residential development,
the basic demand for housing by incoming population — in particular, affordable housing for the
year-round population — will be an important need to be addressed by local planning agencies in
the coming decade. An informed analysis of where and how fast development will occur is crucial
to the development of land use policies for Onslow County's next ten-year planning period.
1 2. Year -Round Population Projections
Based on Coastal Area Management Act planning guidelines, population projections prepared by
the Office of State Planning are the appropriate data to be utilized in projecting year-round
population for Onslow County from 1995-2005. Table 41 "Total Population by Age and Percent
Change", and Table 42 "Population and Percent Increase by Race and Sex", have been compiled
directly from data provided by the Office of State Planning. However, due to 1980-1995
annexations and unpredictable development patterns, indicated municipal growth in Onslow
County from 1995-2005 is based on the assumption that each municipality will retain its 1995
percentage of population relative to total county population throughout 1995-2005 (as opposed
to utilizing individual 1980-1995 municipal growth rates).
Table 39
Onslow County
Summary of Projected Year -Round Population Growth, 1995-2005
Year -Round Population
Municipality/Area
1995
2000
2005
1) Holly Ridge
787
903
988
2) Jacksonville
75,069
86,106
94,210
3) North Topsail Beach
1,070
1,227
1,343
4) Richlands
1,268
1,454
1,591
'
5) Surf City (Part)
333
382
418
II-1

I
Table 39 (continued) I
Year -Round Population I
Municipality/Area 1995 2000 2005
6) Swansboro 1,351 1,550 1,695
'
Total Municipalities 79,878 91,622 100,246
Total Unincorporated Areas 68,034 78,037 85,381
Total County 147,912 169,659 185,627
Sources: North Carolina Office of State Planning; extrapolation of data for individual areas for 2000-
2005 by Holland Consulting Planners, Inc.
NOTE: Due to 1980-1995 annexations and unpredictable development patterns, indicated municipal growth
from 1995-2005 is based on the assumption that each municipality will retain its 1995 percentage
of population relative to total county population throughout 1995-2005 (as opposed to utilizing
individual 1980-1995 municipal growth rates).
,
Based on Table 39, the average annual population growth rate for the county as a whole should
continue to decrease during the planning period. This trend is outlined in Table 40, below.4
1
Table 40
Onslow County
Average Annual Year -Round Population Growth Rate and Percent Change, 1995-2005
Average Annual Year -Round Percent Change in
Population Growth Rate Growth Rate
Area 1995-2000 2000-2005 '95 '00 to '00= 05
Onslow County 2.9% 1.9% -34.5%
Source: Holland Consulting Planners, Inc.
Despite the expected decrease in the annual growth rate, the population growth rate in Onslow i
County will still be considerably higher than the North Carolina rate over the next ten years. From
1995-2005, the state population is estimated to show a 13.0% increase. The Onslow County
population is anticipated to grow 25.5%, with 37,515 more persons, over the same period.
The following two tables are based on population projections by the North Carolina Office of State
Planning.
4Population estimates are continuously being examined for accuracy and, if necessary, the population '
data contained herein will be adjusted.
II-2 ,

Table 41
Onslow County, 1995-2005
Total Population by Age and Percent Change
Population
by Age Group
Age
1995
2000
2005
Percent Change
0-4
12,317
14,128
14,935
21.3%
5-17
18-24
24,532
36,836
28,139
42,252
31,704
44,518
29.2%
20.9%
25-34
28,761
32,990
34,952
21.5%
35-44
18,140
20,807
21,442
18.2%
45-54
12,382
14,202
17,118
38.2%
55-64
6,907
7,922
10,099
46.2%
65-74
4,914
5,637
6,349
29.2%
75 and up
3,123
3,582
4,510
44.4%
TOTAL
147,912
169,659
185,627
25.5%
Source: 1990 US Census and
Office of State Planning.
It is expected that the most rapidly growing age groups from 1995-2005 in Onslow County will be
those aged 55-64 and 75 and up. The growth of the 55-64 age group will be strongly influenced
by the aging of the 45-54 age group which is growing rapidly as well. The 75 and up age group
will continue to experience significant growth both as a result of in -migration and the steady
decrease in the death rate for elderly individuals. Overall, Onslow County's population is very
young. Almost 68% of the total population is expected to be below the age of 35 by the year
2005. However, the median age of the county is increasing. By the year 2005, the 45 and over
age group is expected to be over 20% compared to about 18% in the year 1995.
Table 42
Onslow County, 1995-2005
Population and Percent Increase by Race and Sex
Total Population Percent Change
Category 1995 2000 2005 '95= 05
Total White 112,841 128,335 138,014 22.3%
Males 67,775 77,084 82,598 21.9%
Females 45,066 51,251 55,416 22.9%
Total Non -White 35,071 41,324 47,613 35.7%
Males 20,209 23,638 26,718 32.2%
Females 14,862 17,686 20,895 40.6%
Total Males 87,984 100,722 109,316 24.2%
Total Females 59,928 68,937 76,311 27.3%
Total County 147,912 169,659 185,627 25.5%
Source: 1990 U.S. Census and Office of State Planning.

As was the case from 1980-1995, the non -white, minority population will continue to grow faster �!
than the white population from 1995-2005, and thus assume a gradually larger share of the total
county population. In 1995, the non -white population comprised 23.7% of the county's population.
By the year 2005, the percentage is expected to increase to 25.6%. The male population
comprises almost 60% of Onslow County's population and is expected to continue through the
year 2005. These figures show that Onslow County will have a increasingly diverse population '
by the year 2005.
3. Seasonal Population
Table 43 shows projections of peak seasonal population and total peak population for Stump
Sound Township and Swansboro Township in Onslow County from 1991-2005. These townships
were chosen because they are the only Onslow County townships that have a significant number
of seasonal dwellings. The table assumes that the average annual growth rate of the seasonal
population from 1991-1996 will remain constant through 2005. The permanent population totals
assume that the percentage of each townships permanent population will remain the same as its
1996 percentage.
Table 43
'
Stump Sound and Swansboro Townships
Peak Seasonal Population and Total Peak Population Projections
Stump Sound Township*
Permanent % of Total Peak Peak Seasonal % of Total Peak Total Peak
Year Population Population Population Population Population
1991 10,148 95.5% 476 4.5% 10,624
1996 9,992 94.8% 544 5.2% 10,536
2000 11,452 94.9% 606 5.1 % 12,058
2005 12,530 94.7% 693 5.3% 13,223
Swansboro Township
Permanent % of Total Peak Peak Seasonal % of Total Peak Total Peak
Year Population Population Population Population Population
1991 28,651 98.6% 408 1.4% 29,059
1996 28,210 98.4% 456 1.6% 28,666
2000 32,354 98.5% 499 1.5% 32,853
2005 35,399 98.4% 557 1.6% 35,956
*Less Topsail Island.
Source: 1991 Onslow County Land Use Plan Update and Holland Consulting Planners, Inc.
The impact of seasonal population on Onslow County will continue to grow through the planning
period, but at a relatively low rate. The seasonal population will contribute just over 5% of the total
peak population for Stump Sound Township (not including Topsail Island). Swansboro Township's
seasonal population should continue to make up about 1.6% of the total peak population. These
figures show that the seasonal population should grow at much the same rate as the overall
population of Onslow County.
-4

1 4. Projected Housing Characteristics
The population data provided in Table 39 indicates that between 1995 and 2005, Onslow County's
unincorporated population may be expected to increase by 17,347 persons. In addition, the
forecast number of persons per household is expected to average 2.86 during the planning period.
Based on a population increase of 17,347 persons and an average of 2.86 persons per
household, there will be a demand for approximately 6,065 additional housing units in the county
between 1995 and 2005.
Table 44 is intended to provide a general idea of how the demand for 6,065 housing units might
be distributed among the various structure types. These figures have been determined based on
the distribution of housing units included in the 1990 US Census.
Table 44
Onslow County
Projected Demand for Housing Units by Type, 1995-2005
Units in Structure
1-unit detached
3,954
Percentage
65.2%
1-unit attached
158
2.6%
2-4 units
388
6.4%
5-9 units
285
4.7%
10 or more units
328
5.4%
Manufactured Home, Trailer, Other
952
15.7%
Total Units
6,065
100.0%
Source: Holland Consulting Planners, Inc.
Table 44 indicates that out of 6,065 total housing units estimated to be constructed during the
planning period, 4,112 may be single family, 1,001 multi -family, and 952 may be mobile homes.
It should be stressed that these figures are intended to provide a general idea of housing demand.
Any changes in the county's growth patterns driven by such things as the local economy and base
employment, could have an affect on the validity of the figures provided.
The majority of the residential development during the planning period is expected to continue
near incorporated areas, in the communities surrounding Catherine Lake, and along the waterfront
areas of the Stump Sound and New River. In the event that a regional sewer system is
constructed, additional patterns of residential development could occur. However, in all
probability, a regional sewer system will not be constructed in Onslow County during the planning
period.
Due to the high military presence and relatively low wage rates, the availability of affordable
housing will continue to be an issue. The majority of new year-round residential units will continue
to be single-family detached units, a large portion of which will be manufactured homes. In many
predominantly rural areas, mobile home development will be an important planning issue
throughout the next decade. The overall trend of residential development in waterfront areas will
require increased efforts by county and state regulatory and planning agencies, as well as
II-5

cooperation between the county and rapidly growing municipalities, to ensure that environmental
quality is maintained.
B. PROJECTED ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TRENDS AND RELATED
LAND USE ISSUES '
1. General Economic Projections
Table 45 provides a forecast of growth in Onslow County's various industries, for selective years
between 1995-2005, in both earnings and employment. During the period, overall economic
growth is anticipated. Unemployment rates for Onslow County are anticipated to remain slightly
below that of the state as a whole, and the county's per capita income, aggregate household
income, 'and gross retail sales are expected to grow at rates higher than those of the state.
Table 45`
Onslow County
Growth of Income -Producing Industries, 1995,
2000, and 2005
Change
1995
2000
2005
1995-2005
Total Earnings [1] (Mil'87$)
1,263.84
1,342.33
1,417.67
12.2%
Farm
18.33
18.62
19.20
4.7%
Agricultural Serv., Other
7.98
9.56
11.24
40.9%
Mining
0.88
0.97
1.06
20.5%
Construction
48.31
51.69
54.98
13.8%
Manufacturing
52.85
62.37
72.06
36.3%
Trans., Comm., & Pub. Util.
35.82
38.75
41.37
15.5%
Wholesale Trade
10.32
11.09
11.89
15.2%
Retail Trade
92.51
101.19
110.06
19.0%
Finance, Ins,. & Real Est.
18.30
19.85
21.26
16.2%
Services
101.42
112.33
124.01
22.3%
Federal Civilian Government
98.48
103.71
108.87
10.6%
Federal Military
688.20
715.12
737.66
7.2%
State and Local Government
90.45
97.10
103.99
15.0%
Ill Personal savings are by place of work and
exclude dividends, interest and rent, transfer payments,
and social security contributions.
They include proprietors' net income and wages.
Change
1995
2000
2005
1995-2005
Total Employment (Thousands)
76.60
76.67
76.46
-0.2%
Farm
0.67
0.59
0.54
-19.4%
Agricultural Serv., Other
0.65
0.72
0.79
21.5%
Mining
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.0%
Construction
2.65
2.67
2.68
1.1 %
Manufacturing
3.19
3.40
3.57
11.9%
Trans., Comm., & Pub. Util.
1.81
1.83
1.84
1.7%
II-6

A
FTable 45 (continued)
% Change
1995
2000
2005
1995-2005
Wholesale Trade
0.52
0.52
0.52
0.0%
Retail Trade
9.41
9.79
10.14
7.8%
Finance, Ins,. & Real Est.
2.34
2.37
2.37
1.3%
Services
7.27
7.43
7.59
4.4%
Federal Civilian Government
5.07
5.03
4.98
-1.8%
Federal Military
37.48
36.76
35.86
-4.3%
State and Local Government
5.52
5.53
5.54
0.4%
Source: Woods and Poole Economics, Inc.
The rank of industry types in Onslow County in 1995 and 2005 is provided in Table 46. Very little
change in the rankings is expected to occur. Between 1995-2005, the only change in the
employment rankings is between Farm and Agricultural Serv. Other. The ranking of industry
earnings showed slightly higher variability during the period. The Federal Military is expected to
remain the most significant industry in terms of both employment and earnings during the planning
period.
Table 46
Onslow County
Rank of Industry by Employment Earnings, 1995 and 2005
Employment
Rank
Earnings
Rank
Industry
1995
2005
1995
2005
Farm
10
11
9
10
Agricultural Serv. Other
11
10
12
12
Mining
13
13
13
13
Construction
7
7
7
7
Manufacturing
6
6
6
6
Trans., Comm. & Publ Util.
9
9
8
8
Wholesale Trade
Retail Trade
12
2
12
2
11
4
11
3
Finance, Ins. & Real Estate
8
8
10
9
Services
3
3
2
2
Federal Civilian Government
5
5
3
4
Federal Military
1
1
1
1
State and Local Government
4
4
5
5
Source: Holland Consulting Planners,
Inc.
Projected economic trends and land use issues for specific industries are outlined in the following
sections.

2. Agriculture and Forestry
t
During the planning period, agricultural and forestry employment is expected to decline by 19.6%.
However, overall farm and forestry income is expected to increase. A slight decrease in total
farm/forestry acreage may be expected. Consolidation of some cropland may occur, resulting in
more efficient farm production. Continued forestry production, especially in the northern sections
of the county, will be a vital part of the county's overall economy.
3. Manufacturinq I
Based on Table 46, manufacturing will maintain a ranking of 6th out of thirteen total industries, in
terms of employment and earnings. Manufacturing employment as a percentage of total county
employment should increase slightly during the planning period.
An important planning priority during the upcoming decade will be the ability of Onslow County to
generate additional high paying jobs. It is expected that Onslow County will continue to remain
near the bottom of state rankings in terms of wage rates unless the lack of employment in the -
manufacturing sector is addressed. The ability of an area to attract new industry is largely
contingent on the availability of accessible, suitable parcels and their proximity to utilities. Onslow
County currently has a shortage of both. One potential solution which would supplement existing
infrastructure and increase the attractiveness of the county to manufacturers would be the
construction of an industrial park within the county. An industrial park would provide the county
with the additional sites needed to lure new industry. At the present time, the county has
approved plans for the construction of an industrial park on a 730-acre site off of NC 258.
Arrangements have already been made with the City of Jacksonville to provide sewer service to
the site. If an industrial park is constructed, the significance of manufacturing employment in
Onslow County could be greatly increased. In addition, the proposed Global TransPark may
create opportunities to attract manufacturers to an industrial park if one were to locate in the
county.
It is expected that Onslow County will continue vigorous and effective industrial recruitment efforts.
While the county will continue to focus its efforts on industrial park development, scattered site
non -hazardous industries will be supported by the county. Major industrial development issues
will be:
-- Provision of utilities.
-- Carrying capacity of the transportation system.
-- Continued improvement of the Albert Ellis Airport.
-- Development of industrial park sites.
-- Coordination of industrial development with regulatory controls such as 404
wetland permit requirements.
4. Finance, Real Estate, and Construction
in the finance and real estate category is expected to increase b 1.3% b 2005.
Employment g ry p y y
Consequently, its employment and earnings ranks will remain about the same. It is expected that
retirement housing will comprise a larger portion of Onslow County's housing inventory.
Affordable housing, such as mobile homes, will continue to dominate the housing market.
' II-8

11
Although employment in the construction industry has been forecast to increase by only 1.1 % by
2005, it is probable that it may be much higher, at least during the next few years. This is due to
the high demand for re -construction generated as a result of Hurricane Fran. Construction has
been ranked 7th in employment and earnings for the years 1995 and 2005. The impact of
Hurricane Fran may also act to drive employment up in terms of industry rankings.
5. Wholesale Trade, Retail Trade, and Services
Wholesale trade will remain almost constant through 2005 in both employment and earnings rank.
Retail trade will increase slightly in earnings rank from fourth to third but remain second in
employment rank. By 2005, the provision of services will rank second in terms of earnings. Total
services earnings are expected to increase by 22.3% from 1995 to 2005. It should be noted that
wholesale/retail trade and services are heavily tied to a continued strong military presence in
Onslow County. These industries combined will make up approximately 24% of the county's total
employment by the year 2005.
6. Government Em to ment
Federal Civilian, Federal Military, and State and Local Government combined make up
approximately 62% of Onslow County's total employment in 1995. The Federal Military will remain
the number one ranked industry in terms of employment and earnings through the year 2005. It
should be noted that Federal Civilian and Federal Military employment are both expected to
decrease by the year 2005. However, earnings from government, particularly earnings from the
Federal Military, will continue to be a major factor influencing the county economy.
+� Continued communication between military planning personnel and Onslow County is imperative,
as any major base expansion at Camp Lejeune or the Marine Corps Air Station New River, will
have significant economic impact on Onslow County.
In the late 1980s, studies were conducted at Camp Lejeune that revealed severe training area
deficiencies. It was determined that 10 additional live fire ranges and additional maneuver areas
were required. As a result, in 1991, the Marine Corps purchased 41,000 acres on the west side
of Highway 17 now known as the Greater Sandy Run Area (GSRA). This acquisition nearly
doubled the training area at Camp Lejeune. The purchase of GSRA cost $41 million.
Construction on the Greater Sandy Run Area began in July of 1995. The completion of GSRA is
expected to reach out until 2005 at an estimated cost of $82.6 million.
tIt is probable that as the GSRA reaches completion, the number of personnel at Camp Lejeune
may increase. Due to budget uncertainties, an estimate of how many personnel, or when
1W personnel might be increased, cannot be made at this time.
VIP 7. Commercial Fishing
While forecast data is not available, commercial fishing is expected to continue as an important
part of the Onslow County economy.
1

.0
C. PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT NEEDS AND LAND USE ISSUES 11
Water Supply
As previously mentioned in the Development Constraints: Public Facilities section of this plan, in
the Spring of 1996, Onslow County added two new water treatment plants to the water system.
These plants each have a capacity of 2 million gallons of treated water per day and are
expandable up to 6 million gallons. Water system improvements associated with the construction
of these plants have increased the total system pumping capacity to 11.6 gallons per day (MGD).
During the calendar year of 1996, the Onslow County Water Department's pumping average was
5.6 MGD and the highest pumping day in the last three years was 8.2 MGD on September 7,
1996. _
Based on pumping trends and available capacity, the Onslow County water system will be
sufficient in meeting immediate demand. However, due to the fact that the water system was
designed as a rural "potable" water system and was not intended to be utilized in urban areas, it
does have its limitations. In general, the water system will not be a limiting factor for the continued
development of low density (1 to 2 dwellings/acre) scattered or small scale clustered development
and small scale commercial land uses. The water system could be a significant limiting factor for
future high density development, particularly when fire protection is an issue, unless the
development provides augmentation in the form of additional storage and pumping capacity. At
the present time, the county is conducting a hydrologic study intended to examine potential sites
for the construction of additional wells.
The county's water supply is withdrawn from the Cretaceous Middle Sand and Castle Hayne
Aquifers. These aquifers are also used extensively by various municipalities and industries within
the central coastal plain. Excessive concentrated pumpage may reduce the productivity of the
aquifers and could lead to salt water intrusion. Although the county has not experienced any
significant water shortages, a close monitoring of both pumping quantity and water quality will be
continued to protect the productivity of the aquifer. The Castle Hayne Aquifer has been projected
to last the county 20 years with additional well sites added. I
Z. Wastewater Treatment and Disposal
Present development is dependent upon either septic tank systems, private community systems
or development -provided systems for wastewater treatment and disposal. The continued
dependence upon these three methods, in the absence of public community systems, will become
a limiting factor in the growth of the county. The three methods of wastewater disposal are subject
to certain restrictions which limit their use and expansion; septic tanks are dependent upon
suitable soils, small private systems have a reputation of failure and maintenance problems, and
are subject to State regulations moratoria.
Onslow County has directed sewer feasibility studies in both the Southwest Creek and Piney
Green areas. However, these studies have not resulted in the extension of sewer service. The
county, in cooperation with the City of Jacksonville, plans to provide approximately 160,000 gpd
of the city's wastewater treatment capacity to serve a new industrial park in the county. The N.A.
Burton Business/Industrial Park will be located on a 730 acre site on U.S. Highway 258 between
Richlands and Jacksonville.

A
A Regional Wastewater Task Force was formed with funding assistance from the state to develop
and evaluate options for long-term wastewater disposal in the Carteret, Craven, Onslow, and
Pamlico county areas.
The findings of the Four County Regional Task Force Study were unveiled in August, 1996. In
this study, six separate scenarios were examined for the treatment and disposal of wastewater
for the Four County area. These scenarios are as follows:
— Status quo. This plan calls for improving existing treatment plants and continuing
to rely on septic tanks in unincorporated areas.
-- Consolidation of existing facilities with continued surface water discharge
(streams). Similar to the first option, this also would call for the upgrade of existing
facilities to handle independent package systems.
-- Ocean outfall discharge. This plan has two alternatives, both with multiple
treatment plants. Alternative one calls for one ocean outfall (a pipe which carries
treated wastewater miles into the ocean). Under the proposal, the pipe would be
somewhere in the Swansboro area. Alternative two calls for two points of ocean
entry, one near Swansboro and one north of Cape Lookout.
-- Maximum water reuse. The key concepts under this proposal are golf course
irrigation, wetlands restoration and forestland application. Secondary reuse
potential includes agricultural irrigation, landscape irrigation, and industrial reuse.
Under this proposal, in the extreme long -run, the water may be reclaimed for a
drinking source or used for deep well injection to provide a saltwater barrier in the
aquifer.
j -- Maximum use of natural systems. This proposal calls for a surface discharge
system that relies primarily on land application or constructed wetlands as means
of effluent polishing (the purifying of treated wastewater).
-- Three service areas. This calls for breaking the Four County area into three
groups: Onslow County and Carteret coastal communities, Craven County and the
remainder of Carteret County, and Pamlico County. Discharge limits of wastewater
would be restricted to current permitted flow with an emphasis on improving water
reuse. Septic tanks would continue to be used extensively in unincorporated
areas.
In addition, the Regional Task Force is currently seeking funds through the North Carolina General
Assembly and the Clean Water Bill to continue the Four County study and establish a Water and
Sewer Authority. If funded, the task force will receive approximately $3 million to study and
establish such an authority including an environmental impact statement which will examine all
wastewater treatment scenarios as determined by the regional task force. Once an authority has
been established, an Environmental Impact Study will be conducted of the optimum wastewater
scenario as determined by the state and the regional task force.
Onslow County and the Town of Swansboro are currently working together to expand sewer
coverage in the county. The proposed project includes the construction of a sewer pump station
and a 6 inch force main and appurtenances to connect the proposed Tiara Yachts manufacturing
facility to the Town of Swansboro sewer system. In addition to serving the boat manufacturing

facility, the sewer line will create a 5-mile economic development corridor from the plant site on
the Intracoastal Waterway to NC 24 to Swansboro. The project will also include expansion of the
Swansboro Wastewater Treatment Plant from 300,000 GPD to 420,000 GPD to accommodate
the sewer needs of Tiara Yachts and the anticipated growth along the "economic development
corridor." The sewer line and pump station will be owned, operated, and maintained by Onslow
County. The Wastewater Treatment Plant will continue to be owned, operated, and maintained
by the Town of Swansboro.
Onslow County and Swansboro intend to apply for financial assistance for this project from the
federal Economic Development Administration. Extension of sewer lines and expansion of
facilities will allow the boat manufacturer (Tiara Yachts) to employ nearly 200 people.
The issue of wastewater treatment and disposal may attract more discussion than any other single
planning issue in Onslow County throughout the next five-year planning period. It is the crux of
the entire pro-development/anti-development controversy. There are those who argue that
additional high density development should be curtailed unless municipal or county -supplied
sewage collection is available. On the other side is the belief that current state sanitary standards
and existing county environmental health and zoning standards are adequate to maintain
environmental quality in areas not currently served by existing municipal systems. Proponents of
this policy think that properly permitted "package" treatment systems should be allowed in high
density areas. Several policy statements in this land use plan are likely to address this issue.
3. Solid Waste Disposal
During FY97-98, Onslow County generated 130,100 tons of solid waste. Approximately 93,000
tons of this amount were disposed of in the county's landfills on Meadowview Road. Through
December 31, 1997, the county operated an unlined municipal solid waste landfill. On January
2, 1998, the county opened a lined, Subtitle D landfill. The new landfill is located on a 142-acre
tract immediately north of the previous landfill. This new landfill has a life expectancy of 25-30
years depending on the future growth of the county and expansion of county -wide recycling
programs.
Of the remaining 37,100 tons of refuse generated in the county, 35,200 went into the landfills at
the Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune and the balance was disposed of outside the county.
4. Educational Facilities
Since 1991, five additional Onslow County schools have opened. These include the Jacksonville
Commons Elementary, Southwest Elementary, Onslow County Learning Center (OCLC), Hunters
Creek Elementary, and Jacksonville Commons Middle Schools. Hunters Creek Elementary and
Jacksonville Commons Middle are the county's newest schools which opened for the school year
1997-1998. However, two new elementary schools, Queens Creek and Sand Ridge, will be
opening for the schools year 1998-1999. Numerous additions and renovations have also taken
place at all of the county's schools.
II-12

The Onslow County Board of Education recently approved a plan for the expenditure of a 56
million dollar state bond. The following table provides a summary of how these funds will be
spent.
Table 47
1 Onslow County Schools
State Bond Expenditures
Estimated
Amount from State
School
Proiect
Completion Date
Bonds
Queens Creek Elementary
New School
July 98
7,550,000
�1
Sand Ridge Elementary
New School
Aug 98
7,900,000
Jacksonville Commons Middle
Additions
Jan 98
1,000,000
Summersill Elementary
Additions
Dec 98
2,680,000
Swansboro High
Additions
Jun 98
1,550,000
Dixon High - Phase I
Air Conditioning
May 97
150,000
Richlands High
Additions
Oct 98
1,050,000
Southwest Elementary
Additions
Aug 98
930,000
Dixon Elementary
Additions
Dec 98
1,300,000
Northside High
New School
Jul 2000
17,000,000
Trexler Middle
Dixon High - Phase 2
Additions
Additions
Feb 99
Jan 99
940,000
1,420,000
Southwest High
Additions
Oct 99
2,850,000
White Oak High
Additions/Renov.
Dec 99
670,000
Northwoods Elementary
Site/Parking
Aug 2000
110,000
Woodlands Elementary
New School
Jun 2001
7,900,000
Undesignated
1,000,000
TOTAL
56,000,000
Source: Onslow County State Bond Expenditure Plan
Table 47 indicates that prior to the year 2001, Onslow County will construct three elementary
schools and one high school. Numerous additions and renovations are also scheduled to take
place. Due to these improvement plans and Onslow County's continued dedication to provided
quality education, school facilities are expected to remain more than adequate in meeting demand
during the planning period.
5. Recreation
The county's Parks and Recreation Master Plan was updated in January, 1998 by the Department
of Recreation and Leisure Studies at East Carolina University. The update recommends the
development of three new district parks, a greenway system, additional water -based recreation
opportunities, and more indoor facilities (i.e., recreation centers).

The county intends to develop a 198-acre site as a district park near Richlands. Studies and plans
are estimated to take approximately one year with construction planned to begin in the Spring,
1998. It is anticipated that this site will include baseball and softball fields, tennis courts,
playground areas, picnic shelters with tables and grills, jogging trail, and paved parking.
Onslow County will continue to maintain its regional beach access sites in North Topsail Beach.
As mentioned earlier in this plan, all of the county's beach access sites were destroyed during
Hurricane Fran. The reconstruction of these facilities is a recreational priority for both Onslow
County and the Town of North Topsail Beach.
Onslow County and the Parks and Recreation Department will continue to maintain and improve
its existing recreational facilities as well as construct additional facilities as needed. Given the
county's commitment to the provision of parks and recreational facilities, combined with the fact
that a new regional park has been scheduled for construction, parks and recreation facilities are
expected to remain adequate during the planning period.
6. Transportation
a. Roads
During the planning period, traffic flow and congestion will undoubtedly increase in Onslow
County as the year-round population continues to grow. The highest daily traffic counts
experienced in the county should continue to be along NC 24, NC 172, and U.S. Highways 258
and 17.
The continued improvement of the highway system within the county is necessary in order to
improve the county's image as a desirable community. It is conceivable that the lack of highway
improvement could be a deterrent to growth in certain portions of the county. The following table
provides a summary of transportation improvement projects that have been included in the
NCDOT 1996 Transportation Improvement Plan.
Table 48
Onslow County
NCDOT 1996 Transportation Improvement Plan
LENGTH
(MI)
ROUTE/CITY ID NO.
LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
(KM)
SCHEDULE
US 17 R-2405*
1-40 at Wilmington to east
23.4
Design 1997-98
corporate limits of Holly Ridge.
37.7
Right-of-way 1997-98
Widen roadway to multi -lanes,
Construction 1997-2001
part on new location
US 17 R-2406*
East corporate limits of Holly
17.0
Construction 1997-99
Ridge to four lane section south of
27.4
Jacksonville. Four lane divided
facility with a bypass east of
Verona
US 17 R-2514*
Multi -lanes north of Jacksonville
21.0
Planning 1997
to multi -lanes south of New Bern.
33.8
Design 1997-2003
Widen roadway to multi -lanes with
Right-of-way 1999-2003
bypasses of Belgrade, Maysville,
Construction 2001-03
and Pollocksville on new location.
II-14

0
1
L
A
1
1
A
1
Table 48 (continued)
LENGTH
(MI)
ROUTE/CITY ID NO. LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
(KM)
SCHEDULE
NC 24 R-2105* Swansboro to US 70 at Morehead
' 19.4
Planning 1997
City. Widen roadway to multi-
31.2
Design 1997-99
lanes.
Right-of-way 1997-99
Construction 1997-2001
NC 111 R-2708 US 258-NC 24 to Albert Ellis
5.1
Identified future need
Airport. Upgrade existing roadway 8.2
or provide new access.
US 258
R-2235 NC 24 near Richlands to US 70 at
24.9
Identified future need
Kinston. Widen to a four lane
40.1
divided facility
SR 1308
R-2621 Gum Branch Road, US 258-NC
7.5
Identified future need
24 in Richlands to SR 1336 in
12.1
Jacksonville. Widen roadway to a
multi -lane facility.
Jacksonville
U-2107* Jacksonville bypass, US 17 South
4.4
Design 1997-2001
to US 17 North. Four lane divided
7.1
Right-of-way 1997-2001
facility on new location.
Construction 1997-2003
Jacksonville
U-2107A Jacksonville bypass, US 258-NC
0.8
Design 1997-2000
24 to US 17 South. Four lane
1.3
Right-of-way 1998-2000
divided facility on new location.
Construction 2000-2003
Jacksonville
U-2540 SR 1308 (Bell Fork Road), NC 24
2.1
Identified future need
to US 17. Widen roadway to a
3A
five lane curb and gutter facility.
Jacksonville
U-3439 US 17 relocation, Jacksonville
--
Identified future need
byp. (U-2107) northward. Four
lane divided facility on new
location.
Jacksonville
U-3616 Western Boulevard, US 17 to SR
4.0
Planning 1999-2000
1308 (Gum Branch Road). Widen
6.4
Design 2000-2002
roadway to a multi -lane facility.
Right-of-way 2002
Construction 2003
NC 50
B-3008 Juniper Creek. Replace bridge no.
--
Right-of-way 1999
16
Construction 2000
SR 1101
B-2938 White Oak River. Replace bridge
—
Right-of-way 1999
SR 1442
no. 49
Construction 2000
SR 1225
B-2157 Branch of New River. Replace
--
Under Construction
bridge no. 49
SR 1332
B-3009 White Oak River. Replace bridge
-
Construction 1999
SR 1118
no. 9
SR 1406
B-3215 Northeast Creek. Replace bridge
--
Right-of-way 1998
no. 119
Construction 1999
SR 1406
B-3216 Northeast Creek overflow.
—
Right-of-way 1998
Replace bridge no. 118
Construction 1999
SR 1423
B-3682 Little Northeast Creek. Replace
—
Right-of-way 2002
bridge no. 3
Construction 2003
SR 1503
B-3217 Bear Creek. Replace bridge no.
—
Right-of-way 2000
21
Construction 2001
SR 1509
B-3358 Parrot Swamp. Replace bridge
--
Right-of-way 2000
no. 91
Construction 2001
II-15

Table 48 (continued)
LENGTH
(MI)
ROUTE/CITY ID NO.
LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
(KM)
SCHEDULE
Jacksonville E-3406
NC 24 (Freedom Trail/ Johnson
—
Under Construction
Boulevard). Intersection
improvements for bicyclist safety.
Jacksonville E-3407
Northern US 17 rail trail, Phase 1:
Onslow Drive to Kellum. Rail
3.1
5.0
Scheduled for
Feasibility Study
Trail.
SR 1423 W 3413
North of SR 1411 to SR 1413.
—
Identified future need
Improve horizontal curvature of
roadway.
SR 1406 Z-3426A
Near Jacksonville at Southern
—
Funded - Construction
Railroad Crossing 641 699J.
not authorized
Safety improvements.
SR 1428 Z-36031
Near Hubert at Norfolk Southern
—
Construction 1997
Railway Crossing 722 900K.
Safety improvements
SR1432 Z-2926C
Near Swansboro at Camp
Funded - Construction
Lejeune Crossing 722 899T.
not authorized.
Install automatic warning devices.
"Indicates Intrastate Project.
Source: NCDOT Transportation Improvement Plan, 1996.
b. Rail System and Navigable Waters
The existing rail and navigable waters serving Onslow County should be adequate to serve
commercial and seasonal population growth during the next planning period. Major issues
surrounding navigable waters will be the placement of spoil material from dredging operations in
wetland areas, and concern for maintaining safe recreational boating corridors in increasingly
congested Stump Sound. Marine development along Stump Sound will be an important planning
concern during the next five years as a result of those two issues. The Army Corps of Engineers
is responsible for maintaining the inlets and channels located within Onslow County. The New
River Inlet, Bogue Inlet, and Intracoastal Waterway are dredged several times per year by one of
three government dredges docked in Wilmington, NC. Dredge spoils from these areas are
deposited along the sides of the channels. In addition, the New River channel from the inlet to the
City of Jacksonville is dredged every two years and spoils are deposited on the sound side of
North Topsail Beach. No dredging activities are taking place within the White Oak River.5
51VIarine Corps Base Lejeune and military personnel from all branches of the military regularly conduct
riverine training exercises and Onslow County supports dredging to accommodate these activities.
II-16

IC. Air Transportation
The Albert Ellis Airport exists as a major potential resource for the county in the context
of expanding and giving more variance to the local economy. Continued support for the operation
and expansion of the airport will be necessary in the county's attempts to attract new industries
to the area. Table 49 provides a summary of forecast aviation activity for the years 2000 and
2010. Table 50 provides development recommendations, as included in the North Carolina Airport
System Plan.
Table 49
Albert Ellis Airport
Summary of Forecast Aviation Activity, 2000 and 2010
Airport/Activity
2000
2010
Albert Ellis (Jacksonville)
Air Carrier Enplanements
154,865
233,566
Based Aircraft
32
32
Operations
Air Carrier Operations
11,500
15,100
General Aviation .
23,500
23,500
Military
8,000
8,000
Airport Total
43,000 _
46,600
Peak Hour Operations
15
17
Instrument Approaches
6,610
8,310
Air Cargo Tonnage
34
45
Source: North Carolina Airport System Plan.
Table 50
Albert Ellis Airport
Airport Facility Development Recommendations
Additional Improvements
Total
Existing Phase I
Phase II
Phase III
Additional
Improvements Facilities (1992-1996)
(1997-2001)
(2020-2010)
Improvements
LAND ACQUISITION 663 acres
0 acres
RUNWAY
Paving 118,340 SY
23,340 SY
23,340 SY
_
Overlay
118,340 SY
118,340 SY
TAXIWAY
Paving 39,444 SY
7,780 SY
7,780 SY
Overlay
39,444 SY
39,444 SY
NAVAI DS
MLS, ILS ILS, MALSR
MLS
MLS
NDB, PAPI NDB, PAR
REIL, MALSR REIL
II-17

Table 50 (continued)
Additional Improvements
Total
Existing
Phase I
Phase II
Phase III
Additional
Improvements
Facilities
(1992-1996)
(1997-2001)
(2020-2010)
Improvements
LIGHTING
Runway
14,200 LF
17,000 LF
17,000 LF
Taxiway
15,000 LF
2,800 LF
2,800 LF
TERMINAL BUILDING
Air Carrier
30,000 SF
3,370 SF
3,370 SF
General Aviation
600 SF
1,900 SF
1,900 SF
APRON AREA
Air Carrier
Paving
19,000 SY
1,400 SY
1,400 SY
Overlay
19,000 SY
19,000 SY
APRON AREA (con't)
General Aviation
18,865 SY
0 SY
Paving
18,865 SY
18,865 SY
Overlay
AUTO PARKING
Air Carrier
14,000 SY
5,060 SY
5,060 SY
General Aviation
1,120 SY
0 SY
STORAGE HANGAR
Conventional
2,688 SF
T-Hangar
10 units
12 units
12 units
MAINTENANCE
0 SF
HANGAR
FUEL SYSTEM
36,000 gal.
36,000 gal.
Source: North Carolina Airport System Plan.
7. Other County Facilities
Ongoing improvements to the county's existing hospitals, health care, police, fire, and emergency
medical facilities should allow the county to provide adequate services and protection to incoming
residents over the next five years. Onslow County contracted with both Neuse River Council of
Governments and Petersen Architects, P.A., to provide support services for the completion of a
Facilities Master Plan. The purpose of this section is to summarize the recommendations that
were included in the Facilities Master Plan. The reader is cautioned that it is highly likely that the
county will choose to implement only portions of the plan. The master plan was completed in
March, 1997, and includes recommended actions necessary to achieve two specific objectives:
-- Centralize governmental operations into "service clusters" where appropriate.
-- Upgrade associated facilities to ensure compliance with ADA regulations and all
other building and fire safety codes.
II-18

1
The following action sequence and associated architectural cost analysis were recommended in
the Facilities Master Plan to attain the two objectives listed above:
1. Purchase of the vacated NationsBank and Brendle's facilities, including associated
parking, at the New River Shopping Center in Jacksonville.
These two combined facilities are currently available for purchase at $1.1 million from
North Hills Properties, Inc. The Project Management Team considers this action step a top
priority because it provides an initial critical mass of available space for "service clustering",
while simultaneously ensuring that other major facilities will also become available for the
development of service clusters as major departments are transferred to the facilities
located at the New River Shopping Center.
2. Designation of "core administrative services" cluster and relocation of cluster to former
NationsBank facility.
The Project Management Team has identified six departments for designation as "core
administrative services" and potential development as a service cluster. These
departments include:
a. County Administration (including Commissioners' meeting room)
b. Finance
C. Management Information Services (MIS)
d. Purchasing
e. Personnel
f. Public Works Administration
These departments have been selected because they collectively have limited contact with
the general public, but more interaction with all the county departments.
The former NationsBank facility is a two-story building and offers a central location, drive -
through capability, ample parking, and the opportunity for future expansion of other
departments into adjacent vacant spaces.
Note: The reader is cautioned that it is highly likely that the county will not implement all of the
above recommendations.
The Master Plan also includes a detailed narrative describing the needs of the six "core
administrative services" departments and provides a justification for including each of these
departments in the recommended service cluster at the former NationsBank facility.
In addition, the Onslow County Public Library Report provides recommendations concerning the
long range provision of library facilities and services. Library service in Onslow County is deficient
because the present level of service is not coordinated to the special characteristics of the
population in more than a limited way. Limitations need to be removed and the present services
increased, expanded, and improved by the addition of contemporary information services that are
now much in demand throughout communities in the United States. The U.S. Census shows that
81% of county households are families, 86% are married couples, and that 79% of children live
with both parents. These latter factors support and drive the need for high quality library service.

D. REDEVELOPMENT ISSUES
Onslow County's greatest redevelopment issues during the planning period will be the
redevelopment of areas following Hurricane Fran and the preservation and renovation of housing
for its low -to -moderate income families and individuals. Although the greatest amount of damage
inflicted by the storm was in the incorporated area of North Topsail Beach, damage was sustained
in inland areas. The following provides a North Carolina Division of Emergency Management
summary of Hurricane Fran's impact on Onslow County:
Homes Affected/Damaged
Businesses Damaged
Home and Business Damaged
Governmental Buildings Damaged
Schools Damaged
Debris Removal Cost
Agricultural Loss
Forestry Loss
Temporary Housing Payments
Individual & Family Grants
SBA Loans
Public Assistance
Economic Impact on County
4,926
409
$287 million
Damage estimated at $500,000
$1.6 million
$15 million
$35 million
$30 million
$3,317,103 to 2,034 applicants
$2,048,317 to 739 applicants
$13,214,500 to 478 applicants
$17,229,596 to 193 applicants
$347 million
Onslow County will support the reconstruction of any properties destroyed during the storm,
consistent with applicable Onslow County Ordinances. Onslow County will undertake the
following in support of residential development for its low -to -moderate income families and
individuals:
-- Support applications for North Carolina Community Development housing
rehabilitation funds.
-- Support applications for North Carolina Housing Finance Agency home
improvement funds.
-- Investigate the development and enforcement of a minimum housing code.
II-20

SECTION III: LAND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
The CAMA regulations require the establishment of a specific land classification system to support
the local government's policy statements. This system should reflect developing land use patterns
' within a community. The CAMA 15A NCAC 7B regulations state:
"The land classification system provides a framework to be used by
local governments to identify the future use of all lands. The
designation of land classes allows the local government to illustrate
their policy statements as to where and to what density they want
growth to occur, and where they want to conserve natural and
cultural resources by guiding growth."
The 15A NCAC 7H requirements provide for the following land classifications: developed, urban
transition, rural with services, and conservation. Each applicable land classification must be
represented on a land classification map. In applying these classifications, Onslow County should
carefully consider where and when various types of development should be encouraged.
Additionally, the areas of environmental concern requiring protection should be identified and
mapped.
The following land classifications will apply in Onslow County's jurisdiction:
URBAN TRANSITION: Areas included in the urban transition classification are presently being
developed for urban purposes, or will be developed in the next five to ten years. These areas
should eventually require complete urban services within the planning period. The urban transition
areas include mixed land uses such as residential, commercial, institutional, industrial, and other
uses approaching high to moderate densities. In general, residential densities are allowed in
excess of an average of three dwelling units per acre, with a minimum single-family residential lot
size of 10,000 square feet. These areas are generally located between Jacksonville's planning
jurisdiction and Highways SR 1324 and SR 1410-1411; west of Jacksonville's planning jurisdiction
along segments of US 258 and NC 50; and east of SR 1243, SR 1212 and SR 1113.
LIMITED TRANSITION: This classification will provide for controlled development with services.
Utilization of this classification is necessary to accommodate and adequately serve areas which
will experience development which will occur during the planning period. The policies included
in this plan address local economic development and natural resources protection policies within
the Limited Transitition areas. These areas are developing and require some level of municipal
type services including central water and sewer systems. This classification is necessary to
provide for growth occurring in areas along both sides of NC 24 north of the Marine Base and east
to the Intracoastal Waterway, within the area surrounded by US 17 - SR 1113 - SR 1212 - NC 53 -
SR 1107 - SR 1119, and generally within the area south of the New River bounded on the north
by the Marine Base, on the south by the Intracoastal Waterway, and on the west by SR 1518 and
SR 1531 (excluding the NC 210/NC 172 community area). Both areas are adjacent to or near
numerous conservation areas. The orderly development of these areas, including the provision
of central water and sewer service, will support the economic development and natural resource
policies of this land use plan. In general, the predominant land use shall be moderate density
residential with 10,000 to 15,000 square foot lot sizes. Clustering or development associated with
planned unit developments may be appropriate within this classification. However, some scattered
commercial, health care, and industrial development may occur.

COMMUNITY: Intensive development will not be encouraged in this class due to the lack of urban
services and/or physical limitations. The general range of acceptable uses is limited to single-
family residences, isolated general and convenience stores, churches, public facilities, light
industry, and health care facilities. The community classifications are located in the areas
surrounding the NC 210/NC 172 intersection, Silverdale, Belgrade, and Catherine Lake.
RURAL WITH SERVICES: The rural with services classification is to provide for very low density i
land uses including residential use where limited water services are provided in order to avert an
existing or projected health problem. Areas meeting the intent of this class are appropriate for
very low intensity residential uses where lot sizes are large and where the provision of services
will not disrupt the primary rural character of the landscape. Most development will be supported
by a closed water system. Public facilities and health care facilities are also allowed. All areas
of the county not otherwise classified are considered to be rural with services.
RURAL: The rural class is the broadest of the land classes and is designated to provide for
agriculture, forest management, mineral extraction, and other low intensity uses. Residences may
be located within the rural class where urban services (other than public water system) are not
required and where natural resources will not be permanently impaired. Some large developments
may be encouraged in the rural class when there is an absence of otherwise suitable land within
the developed and transition classes and/or when there is a possible adverse environmental
impact to the urban populace from the proposed development. Such large developments or uses
include airports, land application sewer systems, and power plants. Public facilities and health
care facilities are allowed. The only area of the county classified as rural is an area located
between the Onslow-Pender County line and NC 50.
CONSERVATION: The following areas of environmental concern and fragile areas are included
in the Onslow County conservation classification:
Natural Resource Fragile Areas: These areas include the hardwood swamps located
along the New River and White Oak River and their tributaries. The Great Sandy Run
Pocosin located in the Stump Sound Township, and the White Oak Pocosin in Hofmann
State Forest may also be considered natural resource fragile areas. These areas are
significant natural areas as identified by the Natural Heritage Program.
404 Wetlands: This classification includes concentrated areas of 404 wetlands which meet
the wetlands definition contained in Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Only uses
consistent with the policy statements section of this plan will be allowed. In all areas of the
county's planning jurisdiction considered by the US Army Corps of Engineers to be 404
wetlands, the applicable federal regulations shall apply.
Coastal Wetlands: This classification includes all areas of marsh subject to regular or
occasional flooding by tides, including wind tides. However, tidal flooding is understood
not to include hurricane or tropical storm tides. The existence of coastal wetlands must
be determined by the Division of Coastal Management. Development which meets the
minimum use standards of 15A NCAC 7H, the Onslow County zoning ordinance, and the
policies contained in this plan shall be allowed in areas classified as coastal wetlands.

r
Estuarine Shorelines: All areas lying 0-75 feet landward of the mean high water level of
estuarine waters are classified as estuarine shorelines. Because of map size and scale,
these areas cannot be accurately mapped. Precise locations must be determined in the
field. Uses will be allowed within the estuarine shoreline areas that are consistent with the
15A NCAC 7H use standards, the Onslow County zoning ordinance, and the policies
contained in this plan.
ORW Estuarine Shorelines: All areas lying 0-575 feet landward of the mean high water
level of estuarine waters designated as Outstanding Resource Waters are classified as
ORW estuarine shorelines. Because of map size and scale, these areas cannot be
accurately mapped. Precise locations must be determined in the field. Uses permitted by
the Stump Sound and Bear Island ORW Management Plans, 15A NCAC 7H, and the
policies contained in this plan shall be allowed.
Estuarine and Public Trust Waters: All public trust and estuarine waters are included in
this classification. All waters in Onslow County's planning jurisdiction are classified as
estuarine waters as described by 15A NCAC 7H.0206, or public trust areas as described
by 15A NCAC 71-1.0207. Uses permitted by the policies contained in this plan and 15A
NCAC 7H shall be allowed. Public trust waters include both inland and coastal waters,
while estuarine waters are located only within coastal waters. The following provides a
delineation of the distribution of inland and coastal waters within Onslow County:
Beasleys (Barlow) Creek ..........................
Kings Creek ....................................
Turkey Creek ...................................
Mill Creek ......................................
New River ......................................
Wheeler Creek ..................................
Everett Creek ...................................
Stones Creek ...................................
Muddy Creek ...................................
Mill Creek ......................................
Lewis Creek ....................................
Southwest Creek ................................
Brinson Creek ..................................
Northeast Creek .................................
Wallace Creek ..................................
Codels Creek ...................................
French Creek ...................................
DuckCreek ....................................
Freeman (Browns) Creek .........................
C
C
C
C
Inland waters above, coastal
waters below US 17 bridge at
Jacksonville
C
C
C
C
C
Inland waters above, coastal
waters below Maple Hill (Maple)
Landing
Inland waters above, coastal
waters below railroad bridge
Inland waters above, coastal
waters below the first bridge
upstream from the mouth
C

Bear Creek ..................................... C
Queens Creek .................................. Inland waters above, coastal
waters below Frazier's Landing
Parrotts Swamp ................................. C
White Oak River ................................. Inland waters above, coastal
waters below Grants Creek
Stevens Creek .................................. C
Holland Mill (Mill Pond) Creek ...................... C
Webbs Creek ................................... Inland waters above, coastal
waters below railroad bridge
Freemans Creek ................................
Calebs Creek ...................................
Grant's Creek ...................................
Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW): This area includes all waters within the Stump
Sound and Bear Island ORWs. These areas have been designated by the North Carolina
Environmental Management Commission as Outstanding Resource Waters. Allowed uses
will be those permitted by the use standards included in the Stump Sound and Bear Island
ORW Management Plans, 15A NCAC 7H, and the policies contained in this plan. The
following describes the areas included within the Bear Island and Stump Sound ORWs:
The Bear Island ORW (White Oak River Basin) includes all waters
within an area defined by a line from Bogue Inlet to the mainland at
SR 1117 to a line across Bogue Sound from the southwest side of
Gales Creek to Rock Point, including Taylor Bay and the
Intracoastal Waterway.
The Stump Sound ORW (Cape Fear River Basin) includes all
waters of Stump Sound and Alligator Bay from market Number 17
to the western edge of Permuda Island, but excluding Rogers Bay,
the Kings Creek Restricted Area, and Mill Creek.
The land classifications are delineated on Map 14. It should be noted that the Land Classification
Map delineates an area referred to as Developed/Military. Onslow County does not have any
jurisdiction in this area. The land classification map provides guidance for the development of
Onslow County's planning jurisdiction during the next five to ten years.
1
1

110
no
434
.1,
cosaw weft"": financed In r
or Ww marsh subject. is preparation Of this map was 1437 1443
This closeftaftil kx*x*s d areas of 8011111131 The grant provided by the North 438 434
part through 8 regular or occasional flooding by tides. including wind Wes. However. Wall 1434
flooding is understood not to include hurric— or tropical storm Was. Management PrO91*13111,
DwnlwmrA which meets the minimum use standards of 15A NCAC 7H Carolina Coastal vided by the Coastal Zone 142 435
through funds Pto
in areas cis 11972, as amended, which
Management Act 0
WW this policies contained In this plan shall be allowed
as coastal wetlands. the OMCS Of ocean and IA33 436
Is administered by National
Resource management, ­142
04 Vhftftds* coastal ospheric Administration.
Oceanic and Alm P33 ;:7 �ik 5",%
meet the wettendo 425
This classification includes areas of 404 Wetlands which
definition contained in Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Only us"
consistent with the policy statements section of this plan WIN be aillimed. A 1423 141
The arm are generally delineated on the Land Classification Map.• 4.
specific locations must be determined in the field by representatives of the 0 413 *11p?
WlImington office of" U.S. AnTry Corps of Engineers. The county concurs "e;
to
wNh the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' standards and does not Intend
develop more reVACM standards. 1410 to
•tx
Estuedne Shorelln": .
of the "man high water level of estuarine
An areas ov 0-75 feat landward
Wolin not designated as Outstanding Resource Vftere are clssshW as Ae
estuarine shorelines. Bemuse of map stze and scale. these areas cannot
0I,
Da Wcumely mapped. Precise locations must be determined In the field.
Uses consistent with the policies contained In this plan, and the 15A NCAC Ar.
7H use standards shall be allowed in estuarine shoreline areas.
130 e'eune
am
gj,"filne and Public Trust 11111-tem:
AN public trust areas and estuarine waters are kwkWed in thisclassification. 1303 310 307
Except for two Wand water areas, all waters in Onslow Cmintys P13-ing 1302 00 J311
jurisdiction are classified as estuarine Waters its described by 15A NCAC 13
7
7H.0206 or public bust areas as described by 15A NCAC 7H.0207. Uses 1309
permitted by the policies contained in this plan and 15A NCAC 7H Shall be
allowed. The policies dealing with 110atIM9 structures are more restrich" Ric 1317
then the 16A NCAC 7H. 30 314
316
SH
.25
..........
.. .. .. .
ORW Estuarine Shorelines: Hw 1300
AN areal lying 0-575 feet landward of the mean high water level Of
1230
221
1224
1 1 afire Corps a 0
asoRWestuatine shorelines. Because of map size and scale, these N Air estuarine Waters designated as Outstanding Resource Waters are classified
123 at Now River
be ratety mapped. Precise locations must be determined in the 1 1236 1 3
Uses peffnitted by the stump Sound and Bear Island ORW -
field. 21
M~ffwm pians, 16A NCAC 7H, and the policies contained In this plan
cow
shall be allowed The policies dealing with floating stnictums, 909. and
mooring buoys are more restrictive than the ORW Management Plan and 1230
2eS
4*11'. * , 4 no. 0
15A NCAC 7H. 1134•1_42,.4
-%.1220
.**$I lok.
# .$" #..
­­
Outstanding Resource Wgktvm (ORWY ALBERT %". , "
a) ?i
Rus
classification includes the waters looted with
121
in the Stump Sound and 1218 This do AIRPORT
d uses will be those permitted by the use 1209
Bear Island ORW areas. Allowed
Al—
stm ride Included in the Stump Sound and Baer Island ORW Management 1210 203
In this plan. The policies 1210•• '7 FfF,'
Plano, 1 SA NCAC 7H. and the POW" c0l 120
1n01 resbictirvelfwtheORW
dealing with floating structures and signs Gm
Management Plan and 15A NCAC 7H.
1205 1207 tt
203 q6 132
C%
LEGEND Z102 4**
Training Area�.�,-�­­
ne z zw ;I')- V4 , ." *. I
106 Isis
CORPORATE LIMITS 201
P4. .8 tee . 11"41
MUNICIPAL EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION
534
URBAN TRANSITION
7
'M
LIMITED TRANSITION �':.f"S^`irArRroos
COMMUNITY
RURAL WITH SERVICES
RURAL
CONSERVATION (SEE NOTES)
DEVELOPED/MILITARY
NOTE: onstow County do- not have any
jurisdiction over the Developed/Military area.
0
V_ PLrjV[jtj? COUIVry
Innnin
z
In -
MAP 14
'LAND CLASSIFICATION MAP
dNSLOW COUNTY
miles
? I * 1 1 111-5
11 CA L1_r

1
SECTION IV: ONSLOW COUNTY POLICY STATEMENTS
I
This section of the plan provides policies which address growth management and protection of
Onslow County's environment. The policies should be based on the objectives of the citizens of
Onslow County and satisfy the objectives of the Coastal Resources Commission.
It is emphasized that the policy statements are extremely important and have a day-to-day impact
on individual citizens within Onslow County's planning jurisdiction. The statements have an impact
in several areas, including:
- CAMA minor and major permitting as required by N.C.G.S. 113A-118 prior
to undertaking any development in any area of environmental concern.
-- Establishment of local planning policy.
-- Review of proposed projects requiring state or federal assistance, or
approval to determine consistency with local policies.
The Coastal Resources Commission requires all governments to specify stated development
policies under each one of five broad topics. These topics include:
-- Resource Protection
Resource Production and Management
Economic and Community Development
-- Continuing Public Participation
-- Storm Hazard Mitigation, Post -Disaster Recovery, and Evacuation Plans
The county believes that the majority of the policies contained in the 1991 Land Use Plan were
effectively implemented. Onslow County has supported the CAMA program and the 15A NCAC
7H use standards which are intended to protect AEC's. However, the county failed to expand the
area regulated by zoning.
During 1995 and 1996, the NCAC 7B CAMA planning guidelines were revised. The revised
guidelines included new requirements for the development of policy statements, including the
following policy statement additions:
— A general vision policy statement describing the type of community
that the local government would like to become within the next ten
years.
— A basic statement of the community attitude toward resource
protection.
-- A policy addressing the protection of wetlands identified as being of
the highest functional significance on maps supplied by the Division
of Coastal Management, where available.
— A policy addressing moorings and mooring fields.
IV-1

-- A policy addressing water quality problems and management
measures designed to reduce or eliminate local sources of surface
water quality problems.
-- A statement of the community attitude toward resource production
and management.
-- A statement of the community attitude toward economic and
community development.
-- A policy addressing commitment to state and federal programs,
including housing rehabilitation, community development block
grants, housing for low and moderate income level citizens, water
and sewer installation, and rural water systems.
-- A policy addressing assistance to interstate waterways.
Based on the analysis of existing conditions and trends, and discussion with the county's Planning
Board and Board of Commissioners, the policies outlined in the following section have been
formulated to provide a guide for advising and regulating development of available land resources
in Onslow County throughout the current planning period, i.e., 2002. Policies which were
considered, but not adopted, are provided in Appendix II.
A. VISION STATEMENT
Onslow County has a rich history which reflects a strong relationship between its private sector
and the military. The county is proud of the military presence which is highly visible in the
community. The county will continue to support the military and strive to improve both the public
and private sector's ability to support the military. At the same time, the county desires to expand
its industrial base and broaden economic opportunities for its residents. The county will strive to
achieve an infrastructure system which will be supportive of business/industrial development and
the continued growth of the county's tourist industry while maintaining a balance with protection
of the natural environment. Based on the county's 1995 Strategic Plan, Operation Onslow, the
county desires to accomplish the following:
-- Affordable housing
-- Environmental protection, including provision of county -wide water and
sewer facilities
-- Expansion of the library system
-- Reduction of adult businesses
-- Provision of adequate police protection
-- Support for expanded tourism
-- County -wide zoning
-- Establishment of development regulations in addition to zoning
Onslow, County has undertaken efforts to educate its citizens on the need for and value of county-
wide zoning. This effort has been directed by the Onslow County Planning Department. Zoning
information presentations have been made to the following community organizations during the
development of this plan: Sneads Ferry Community Awareness Club, Jacksonville Board of
IV-2

Realtors, Onslow County Home Builders Association, Jacksonville Chamber of Commerce,
Richlands Rotary Club, American Association of Professional Women. These efforts to educate
the public on the need for zoning will continue throughout the planning period.
B. RESOURCE PROTECTION POLICY STATEMENTS
Community Attitude on Resource Protection
Onslow County has valuable natural resources which enhance the environment and provide
incentives for tourism and other economic activities. The county will support resource protection
policies which meet or exceed the state's 15A NCAC 7H minimum use standards for the protection
of areas of environmental concern. However, the county supports economic development that
is consistent with the policies contained in this plan.
Physical Limitations
Soils (Issue discussed, page 1-69)
Policy (a): Onslow County opposes the installation of package treatment plants and septic
tanks or discharge of waste in any areas classified as coastal wetlands, freshwater
wetlands (404), or natural heritage areas. This policy does not apply to constructed
wetlands.
Policy (b): The county recognizes the critical functions and values associated with freshwater
wetlands. The county supports the protection of splashable wetlands as defined
by Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act, and administered by the US Army
Corps of Engineers.
Implementation:
(a) Onslow County will rely on the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to enforce
404 wetland regulations.
(b) Onslow County will enforce through the development and zoning permit
process in zoned areas all current regulations of the NC State Building
Code and North Carolina Division of Health Services relating to building
construction and septic tank installation/replacement in areas with soils
w restrictions.
(c) Onslow County will coordinate all development activity with appropriate
county and state regulatory personnel, and in particular with the Onslow
County Building Inspector and Sanitarian.
(d) Onslow County will support planning for and the development of a central
sewer system(s) to serve areas of Onslow County classified as urban
transition, limited transition, and rural with services.
Schedule (a) - (d): Continuing Activities.
I IV-3

Flood Hazard Areas (Issue discussed, page 1-57) 1
Policy: Onslow County desires to minimize the hazards to life, health, public safety, and
development within flood hazard areas.
Implementation: Onslow County will continue to coordinate all development within
the special flood hazard areas with the county Community Development
Department, the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management, FEMA, and the
US Corps of Engineers.
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
Groundwater/Protection of Potable Water Supplies (Issue discussed, page 1-57)
Policy: It is the policy of Onslow County to conserve its surficial groundwater resources.
Implementation: Onslow County will support CAMA and NC Division of
Environmental Management stormwater run-off regulations, and by coordinating
local development activities involving chemical storage or underground storage
tank installation/abandonment with Onslow County Emergency Management
personnel and the Groundwater Section of the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management. The county will plan for an adequate long-range
water supply. In the planning process, Onslow County will cooperate with adjacent
counties to protect water resources.
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
Manmade Hazards (Issue discussed, page 1-71) ,
Policy (a): Onslow County supports plans for expansion of the Albert Ellis Airport as detailed
in the airport's Master Plan.
Implementation: The county will coordinate area development with the airport
plans.
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
Policy (b): With the exception of bulk fuel storage tanks used for retail and wholesale sales,
and individual heating fuel storage tanks, Onslow County opposes the bulk storage
of manmade hazardous materials in areas classified as urban transition, limited
transition, and community which are not also zoned for industrial use. Storage of
hazardous materials (not toxic waste) in low density areas classified as rural or
rural with services will be allowed. In those areas within the county in which federal
holdings are located, applicable state and federal regulations shall apply.
Policy (c): Onslow County is opposed to the establishment of toxic waste dump sites within
the county including dump sites on military reservations.
n
IV-4 I

1
Policy (d): Onslow County opposes the disposal of any toxic wastes, as defined by the US
Environmental Protection Agency's Listing of Hazardous Substances and Priority
Pollutants (developed pursuant to the Clean Water Act of 1977), within its planning
jurisdiction.
Implementation: Onslow County will coordinate the regulation of underground
storage tanks with the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management.
Onslow County will support 15A NCAC 2N, Sections .0100-.0800, which includes
the criteria and standards applicable to underground storage tanks.
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
Stormwater Runoff (Issue discussed, page 1-74)
Policy (a): Onslow County recognizes the value of water quality maintenance to the protection
of fragile areas and to the provision of clean water for recreational purposes and
supports the control of stormwater runoff to aid in the preservation of water quality.
Policy (b): It is county policy to recognize shellfishing waters as a valuable resource and
provide protection to this fragile resource by enforcing all existing applicable
regulations to development or land disturbing activities having a possible impact
upon these waters (including subdivision and zoning regulations in zoned areas).
Additionally, the county will assist and advise other governmental agencies having
jurisdiction over protection of these waters and along adjoining estuarine
shorelines.
Implementation:
(a) The county will support existing state regulations relating to stormwater
runoff resulting from development (Stormwater Disposal Policy 15 NCAC
2H.001-.1003).
(b) Onslow County supports control of agricultural runoff through
implementation of US Soil Conservation Service "Best Management
Practices" program, and/or North Carolina State "Best Management
Practices."
(c) Onslow County supports control of forestry runoff through implementation
of "Forestry Best Management Practices" as provided by the North Carolina
Division of Forest Resources.
(d) Onslow County supports the policy that all State of North Carolina projects
should be designed to limit to the extent possible stormwater runoff into
coastal waters.
Schedule (a) - (d): Continuing Activities.
(See page IV-10, Water Quality Management for additional policies related to
stormwater runoff.)
I IV-5

Cultural/Historic Resources (Issue discussed, page 1-65)
Policy: It is policy to preserve and protect the county's significant architectural,
archaeological, and cultural resources.
Implementation:
(a) Onslow County shall coordinate all housing code
enforcement/redevelopment projects with the NC Division of Archives and
History, to ensure that any significant architectural details or buildings are
identified and preserved.
(b) Onslow County will coordinate all county public works projects with the NC
Division of Archives and History, to ensure the identification and
preservation of significant archaeological sites.
Schedule (a) - (b): Continuing Activities.
Industrial Impacts on Fragile Areas (Issue discussed, pages 1-42 and II-8)
Policy: Onslow County deems industrial development within fragile areas acceptable only
if the following conditions are met:
a. CAMA minor or major permits can be obtained.
b. Applicable zoning ordinance provisions are met in zoned areas.
C. Within coastal wetlands, estuarine waters, and public trust waters, no
industrial use will be permitted unless such use is water related.
This policy applies to both new industrial development and to expansion of existing
industrial facilities.
Implementation: Onslow County will rely on its zoning ordinance in zoned areas
and the CAMA permitting program to implement this policy. -
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
Miscellaneous Resource Protection
Package Treatment Plant Use (Issue discussed, pages 1-80 and II-10)
Policy: The county encourages the utilization of not only package plants, but preferably
innovative treatment and disposal systems which would be more reliable and cost
effective than package systems. Package plant systems inherently require
considerable maintenance -- more maintenance than is sometimes provided. As
a consequence, plant failure is not uncommon.
Therefore, the county's present policy regarding wastewater treatment when a
central off -site system is not accessible, and traditional septic tanks are not
suitable, is to encourage appropriate innovative systems such as low pressure,
modified sites, artificial wetlands in addition to package plants. Further, it is county
policy regarding package plants to encourage more effective monitoring by state
and local officials to improve plan performances.
IV-6

1:
Implementation: Onslow County will rely upon the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality and the county's staff to implement this policy.
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
Marina and Floating Home Development (Issue discussed, page 1-68)
Marinas are considered to be any publicly or privately owned docks constructed to accommodate
more than ten boats, as defined by 15A NCAC 71-1.0208(b)(5). Docks and piers are defined by 15A
NCAC 71-11.0208(b)(6). Onslow County will enforce the following policies to govern floating homes
and marina development:
Policy (a): The county supports the development of marinas and boat dry stack storage
facilities in compliance with applicable local and state regulations. The county
encourages the state to strengthen marina regulations reflecting current
engineering and environmental protection technology. A pump station is required
for the approval of any new marina. The county's policy is to encourage upland
excavation for marina basins and permit open water marinas, provided all aspects
of the marina are consistent with local, state, and federal policies and regulations.
The county also supports the development of open water marinas.
Policy (b): Onslow County's policy for marina construction in ORW waters or ORW estuarine
shorelines shall be consistent with the state's management strategies for ORW
designated areas. Docks and piers will be allowed.
Implementation: The county will rely on the CAMA permitting program to implement
these policies.
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
Policy (c): Onslow County opposes the location of floating structures and vessels for
permanent occupancy in all public trust areas and estuarine waters.
Implementation: The county will investigate the development of an ordinance
designed to enforce this policy.
Schedule: FY2000-2005.
Mooring Fields (Issue discussed, page 1-68)
Policy: Onslow County is concerned with the potential for the development of mooring
fields and supports regulation of them.
Implementation: The county will pursue the development of an ordinance to
regulate the establishment of mooring fields.
Schedule: FY2001-2002.
IV-7

Off -Road Vehicles (Issue discussed, page 1-43)
Policy: Off -road regulations for beaches, public forests, and other public lands are
enforced by agencies other than the county. However, the county supports policies
enforced by other agencies and governmental entities.
Implementation: The county is presently considering no restrictions on off -road
vehicle use and will rely on other government regulations to control usage.
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
Development of Sound and Estuarine Islands (Issue discussed, page 1-68)
Policy: For all sound and estuarine system islands within the regulatory jurisdiction of the
county (with the exception of Huggins Island), the county discourages development
of any sound or estuarine system island outside of very low density residential
development. Very low density development is defined in this policy as one
dwelling unit per 80,000 square feet of land area, at a minimum.
Implementation:
(a) County zoning in zoned areas, flood damage prevention ordinance, and
CAMA minor or major permitting requirements must be met and will be
relied upon to enforce this policy.
(b) Huggins Island is singled out for a specific development policy. Located
near Swansboro at the confluence of White Oak River and the ocean, this
100-acre (approximately) island contains maritime forest and has been
studied by the NC Division of Coastal Management. The owners of the
island have recorded deed restrictions prepared in association with the
Division of Coastal Management and the staff of the Nature Conservancy.
The intent of the deed restrictions is to limit development and protect the
maritime forest and other resources. The deed restrictions are in the form
of restrictive covenants.
Schedule (a) - (b): Continuing Activities.
Bulkhead Construction (Issued discussed, page 1-65)
Policy: Onslow County does not oppose bulkhead installation provided installation is
consistent with 15A NCAC 7H (state guidelines for areas of environmental
concern). Bulkheads must be constructed landward of significant marshland areas.
Installation of bulkheads must not damage marshes.
Implementation: Onslow County will rely on the Division of Coastal Management
to enforce this policy.
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
IV-8

ISea Level Rise (Issue discussed, page 1-62)
Policy: Onslow County recognizes the uncertainties associated with sea level rise. The
rate of rise is difficult to predict. Thus, it is difficult to establish policies to deal with
the effects of sea level rise.
Implementation:
(a) Onslow County will cooperate with local, state, and federal efforts to inform
the public of the anticipated effects of sea level rise.
Schedule (a): Continuing Activity.
(b) In response to sea level rise, Onslow County will review all local building
and land use related ordinances and consider establishing setback
standards, density controls, bulkhead restrictions, buffer vegetation
protection requirements, and building designs which will facilitate the
movement of structures.
Schedule (b): FY2001-2002.
Maritime Forests (Issued discussed, page 1-67)
Policy (a): The county shall encourage the acquisition of high quality tracts of maritime forest
for conservation purposes. Development within mature, high quality tracts of
maritime forest shall be of a residential nature only and shall be restricted to one
dwelling unit for each 80,000 square feet of area proposed for development,
except for Huggins Island.
Policy (b): The maritime forests on Huggins Island shall be protected by limiting clearing and
other site disturbances for construction of the principal structure, accessory use,
parking area, septic tank nitrification system, and driveway access.
Policy (c): In no case shall more than 35 percent of a building site property be cleared or
otherwise subject to ground disturbing activity. Existing natural wetlands, ponds,
and swales shall not be dredged, filled, or otherwise altered except for road and
utility line crossings authorized by permit from the US Army Corps of Engineers.
Implementation: The County shall rely on applicable state, federal, and local
regulations to enforce these policies.
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
Estuarine System (Issue discussed, page 1-64)
Policy: Onslow County's overall policy and management objective for the Estuarine
System is "to give the highest priority to their protection and perpetuate their
biological, social, economic, and aesthetic values, and to ensure that development
occurring within these AEC's is compatible with natural characteristics so as to
minimize the likelihood of significant loss of private property and public resources."
(15A NCAC 7H at .0203) In accordance with this overall objective, Onslow County
will permit those land uses which conform to the general use standards of the
IV-9

North Carolina Administrative Code (15A NCAC 7H) for development within the
Estuarine System with the exception of those policies contained in this plan which
exceed the minimum state standards (see Section V: Relationship of Policies and
Land Classification). Generally, only those uses which are water dependent will
be permitted except for those development activities occurring within the Estuarine
Shoreline AEC.
Implementation: The county will rely on the Division of Coastal Management to
enforce this policy.
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
Outstanding Resource Waters (Issue discussed, page 1-64)
Policy: Onslow County supports the intent and specific provisions of the ORW
classification for the Stump Sound and Bear Island Areas.
Implementation: Onslow County will rely on the Division of Coastal Management
to enforce this policy.
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
Water Quality Management (Issue discussed, page 1-44)
Policy: Onslow County supports the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Management's goals for water quality management as stated on page 1-44 of this
plan.
Implementation:
(a) Onslow County supports implementation of the following actions through
local ordinances to improve water quality:
— Use watershed -based land use planning
-- Protect sensitive natural areas, including coastal wetlands
-- Establish buffer network
-- Minimize impervious cover in site design
-- Limit erosion during construction
-- Maintain coastal growth measures
-- Restoration of impaired waters
— Protection of high value resource waters
-- Management of the cause and sources of pollution to ensure the
protection of those waters currently supporting their uses allowing
for reasonable economic growth
-- Reduction of nutrients in the New River and its tributaries
Schedule: Continuing Activities.
(b) Onslow County will pursue development and adoption of a local ordinance
to regulate intensive livestock operations.
Schedule: FY2002.
IV-10 1

1
n
(c) The Onslow County Community Development Department will undertake
a review of all local land use regulation ordinances to determine if revisions
should be undertaken to respond to specific water quality management
problems to include nutrient reduction, establishment of shoreline buffer
zones, erosion reduction, reduction of impervious surfaces, and
preservation of coastal wetland (marsh lands).
Schedule: FY2001-2002.
(d) Onslow County supports the following actions by the General Assembly
and the Governor:
— Sufficient state funding should be appropriated to initiate a program
of incentives grants to address pollution of our rivers from both point
sources and nonpoint sources.
-- An ongoing source of state funding should be developed to provide
continuous support for an incentives grant program.
— The decision -making process for the award of incentives grants
should involve river basin organizations representing local
governments and other interest groups in the review of all
applications for state funding.
-- The ongoing effort of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to develop administrative rules implementing the
proposed White Oak and Cape Fear River Basin Management
Strategy should continue to involve local government officials in the
development, review, and refinement of the proposal.
Schedule: Continuing Activities.
C. RESOURCE PRODUCTION AND MANAGEMENT POLICIES
Community Attitude Toward Resource Production and Management
Onslow County will implement policies which support resource production and management. All
policies will meet or exceed 15A NCAC 7H minimum use standards. Resource production should
not adversely affect Onslow County's conservation areas. The county will pursue the attraction
of industries which will have minimal adverse environmental impact. While sensitive to
environmental protection issues, the county will strive to maximize its opportunities for economic
growth and development.
In addition, Onslow County enthusiastically supports the maintenance, growth, and development
of the military presence in Onslow County.
IV-11

Recreation Resources (Issue discussed, pages 1-87 and II-13)
Policy (a): Onslow County supports the development of additional estuarine and ocean
shoreline access areas to ensure adequate shoreline access within all areas of the
county. The county will cooperate with municipalities and state and federal
agencies to secure such access. Areas that have traditionally been used by the
public will be given special attention.
Implementation: Onslow County will apply for all available grant funds to aid in the
development of a shoreline access plan to define the need for additional
publicly -owned waterfront recreational facilities. This effort should be closely
coordinated with shoreline access planning by the municipalities.
Schedule: FY2001.
Policy (b): Onslow County will give priority to repairing/replacing damaged/destroyed shoreline
access facilities.
Implementation: Onslow County will be responsible for implementing this policy.
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
Policy (c):
Onslow County will work cooperatively with the county's municipalities to provide
a year-round recreation program.
Implementation: Onslow County will be responsible for implementing this policy.
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
Policy ( d :
)
Onslow County considers coastal wetland areas to be valuable passive recreation
areas. These areas should be protected in their natural state. Only uses which are
permitted by 15A NCAC 7H and the policies contained in this plan will be allowed.
Implementation: Onslow County will rely on the Division of Coastal Management
to implement this policy.
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
Policy (e):
Onslow, County supports the preparation of a county -wide comprehensive
recreation plan.
Implementation: Onslow County will pursue grant funds to support development of
the plan.
Schedule: FY2000-2003.
Policy (f):
Onslow County is aware of the growing desire to develop golf course facilities in
communities with close proximity to coastal waters and sounds. Golf course
projects can be a precursor to economic development through increased tourism
and recreation activities. These projects, however, may impact fragile resources
found in the coastal region.
IV-12

Implementation: Onslow County policy will allow the market place to determine the
exact location of these facilities; all subject to applicable restrictions, regulations,
and availability of public facilities and service. All new golf course developments
shall meet all local, state and federal guidelines applicable for their location. In
addition, Onslow County establishes a natural, undisturbed 75-foot vegetative
buffer extending landward of the mean high water line of the estuarine waters for
golf course development. No development shall occur except that permits for utility
line easements will be allowed. The Onslow County Planning Board will be
considering the need for additional land use regulations to enforce this policy
locally.
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
Productive Agricultural Lands (Issue discussed, page 1-72)
Policy (a): Onslow County supports and encourages use of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service 'Best Management Practices" program. This includes
agricultural practices which limit the runoff of sediment.
Implementation: Private Farming Operations.
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
Policy (b).. Onslow County discourages the direct point source discharge of agricultural runoff
into primary nursery areas, productive shellfishing waters, and ORW designated
areas.
Implementation: Onslow County will rely on applicable state and federal regulations
to support this policy.
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
Aquaculture Activities (Issue discussed, page 1-76)
Policy: Onslow County supports aquaculture activities which comply with applicable
federal, state, and local regulations.
Implementation: Onslow County will rely on applicable state and federal regulations
to support this policy.
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
Productive Forestlands (Issue discussed, page 1-72)
Policy: Onslow County encourages and supports forestry best management practices as
defined in the Forest Best Management Practices Manual, 1989, North Carolina
Division of Forest Resources.
Implementation: Onslow County will rely on private forestry operations to enforce
this policy.
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
I IV-13

Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Development Impacts on Resources (Issue discussed,
pages 1-41 and 1-42)
Policy: Except as otherwise permitted in this plan, residential, commercial and industrial
development should not be allowed in natural heritage areas or coastal wetlands.
Residential, commercial, and industrial development which meets 15A NCAC 7H
use standards and applicable ORW management plans will be allowed in estuarine
shoreline, estuarine water, and public trust areas. In all other areas, development
will be allowed that is consistent with applicable local, state, and federal
regulations.
Implementation: Onslow County will rely on this plan and applicable federal, state,
and local policies to implement this policy.
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
Marine Resource Areas (Issue discussed, page 1-74)
Policy (a): Onslow County reserves the right to review and comment on individual questions
concerning commercial and marine fisheries issues.
Implementation: Implementation of this policy will be the responsibility of the
Onslow County Board of Commissioners.
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
Policy (b): Onslow County supports efforts by NC Marine Fisheries to identify areas suitable
for shellfish bottom leases.
Implementation: Onslow County will rely on the NC Marine Fisheries to implement
this policy.
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
Policy (c): The county will continue to support recreational fishing by encouraging the
expansion of tourism and vacation development.
Implementation: The county will encourage and support state and federal
programs that work toward protection of nursery and seafood habitat areas. The
county will also support efforts to secure Economic Development Grants to develop
a seafood processing facility in the county.
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
Policy (d): The county supports the designation ORW as it will enhance commercial and
recreational fisheries.
Implementation: The county will rely on the Division of Coastal Management for
regulation of the ORW areas.
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
IV-14 I

1
77
L
I
I
1
Peat or Phosphate Mining (Issue discussed, page 1-73)
Policy: Onslow County opposes any peat mining. Phosphate mining activities will be
allowed when an Environmental Impact Statement has been prepared with a
finding of no significant effect on the environment.
Implementation: Onslow County will rely on its zoning ordinance in zoned areas
and applicable state and federal regulations to implement this policy.
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
D. ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Community Attitude Toward Economic and Community Development
Onslow County will support growth and development at the average densities specified in the land
classification definitions. These densities are only a general guide and must be accomplished
through land use control ordinances. Major development of urban nature should be concentrated
in the urban transition and limited transition areas.
It shall be the policy of Onslow County officials to support and encourage efforts to secure
traditional manufacturing industry that is sensitive to the environment, to encourage the promotion
of more tourism, to encourage new commercial and small business activity, and to support local
and in -migration retirement opportunities.
The county enthusiastically supports economic development within both the public and private
sectors of its economy. In pursuit of economic development, the county will implement the
following:
-- County officials will work with the North Carolina Department of Transportation and other
state officials to expedite the implementation of the state TIP.
-- County officials will continue to encourage new industry to locate in the county and the
county will actively work with communities that have water and sewer facilities. In addition,
a North Carolina natural gas line will be installed by November, 1998, to serve Marine
Corps Base Lejeune with feeder lines being planned for the City of Jacksonville and the
N.A. Burton Business/Industrial Park.
-- County officials will support efforts to develop more tourism, commercial and small
business activity, and retirement opportunities.
-- County officials will support efforts to develop a civic center in Onslow County or
Jacksonville as an additional incentive to encourage tourism.
-- County officials will support efforts to prepare promotional and statistical information on
Onslow County designed to assist economic growth efforts and to publicize historic and
other points of interest.
IV-15

Water Supply (Issue discussed, page 1-78 and II-10) 1
Policy: Onslow County supports the extension of central water service into all areas of the
county not classified as rural, including the construction of lines to and through
conservation areas to serve development which meets all applicable state and
federal regulations. ,
Implementation:
(a) The county is aware that inappropriate land uses near well fields increase
the possibility of well contamination. Land uses near groundwater sources
are regulated by the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
through N.C.A.C. Subchapter 2L and Subchapter 2C. Onslow County
recognizes the importance of protecting potable water supplies, and
therefore supports the enforcement of these regulations.
(b) Onslow County supports all efforts to secure available state and federal
funding for the construction and/or expansion of public and private water
systems.
(c) Onslow County supports the construction of water systems with adequate
line sizes to ensure adequate water pressure and fire protection.
Schedule (a) - (c): Continuing Activities.
Sewer System (Issue discussed, page 1-80 and II-10)
Policy: The county will continue to provide water services to county residents and will
continue the process of studying the role of county government in providing
sewage treatment facilities for rapidly growing areas of the county, including the
construction of lines to and through conservation areas to serve development
which meets all applicable state and federal regulations.
Implementation:
(a) The county will secure federal or state grants, when feasible, to help carry
out this policy.
(b) Onslow County supports all efforts to secure available state and federal
funding for the construction and/or expansion of public and private sewer
systems.
(c) Onslow County supports constructed wetlands "created" to aid in treating
waste effluent.
(d) Onslow County supports the findings of the Four County Regional Task
Force Study (page 11-11).
Schedule (a) - (d): Continuing Activities.
IV-16

ISolid Waste (Issue discussed, pages 1-83 and II-12)
Policy: The county will cooperate with any efforts to educate people and businesses on
waste reduction and recycling. The county supports recycling by the county and
other users of the landfill and supports setting up practical collection methods and
education efforts to achieve a high degree of county -wide recycling.
Implementation:
1 (a) Onslow County supports the operation of the new 198-acre Pony Farm
Road landfill.
1 (b) Onslow County favors the siting of recycling centers within all land
classifications except the conservation category.s
(c) County officials are aware that a clean community projects a positive image
for industry, new businesses, and visitors to the area and will continue to
support the efforts of the Clean County Department. Complementing and
supporting the primary goal of reducing litter and preserving and protecting
natural resources, the Committee will address other community issues to
include, but not be limited to, those listed below:
-- The Clean County Department staff will work with schools, business
and industry, civic clubs, governments, and the media to provide
comprehensive involvement of the community in the Keep America
Beautiful System.
-- The Department and staff will continue to educate the public
regarding alternatives to landfilling solid waste, with an educational
focus on recycling and the problems and damages to the
environment caused by illegal dumping.
-- The Department and staff will continue to assist the beach
community with organization of volunteer beach clean-up programs
and a recycling program. The county will continue to furnish the
Town of North Topsail Beach with trash receptacles.
-- The Department and staff will continue assisting with beautification
of county container sites. Clean-up work at container sites will
continue with the availability of court assigned community service
workers.
-- The Clean County Department staff will continue to serve as an
agency to utilize community service workers assigned by the courts
to perform various tasks for improvement of the county.
— The Department and staff will assist the County Commissioners in
implementing local provisions of Senate Bill 111.
6All container sites reopened July 1, 1998, and each container site will have recycling containers for
the use of the public. The material recycling facility (MRF) is planned to reopen in the fall of 1998.
IV-17

11
-- The Clean County Department staff will engage in activities to ,
enforce the county ordinance relating to illegal dumping. This will
include education of county law enforcement personnel with
application of the county's solid waste ordinance. The ordinance
will be updated in order to conform with state and federal
guidelines.
-- The Onslow County Clean County staff will issue permits for debris
removal in compliance with CAMA regulations.
Schedule (a) - (c): Continuing Activities.
Energy Facility Siting and Development (Issue discussed, page 1-71)
Policy (a): There are no electric generating plants located in or proposed for Onslow County.
However, the county will review proposals for development of electric generating
plants on a case -by -case basis, judging the need for the facility by the county
against all identified possible adverse impacts.
Implementation: Implementation will be the responsibility of the Onslow County
Board of Commissioners.
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
Policy (b): At present, Onslow County is not aware of any plans to construct an energy facility
or off -shore drilling support operations in the county. County policy to deal with
such a facility will be formulated if such a facility is proposed, and with the
knowledge that such a facility would come under existing state and federal
regulations prior to being located in the county. However, Onslow County shall
require that all North Carolina Environmental Policy Act requirements be met.
Implementation: I
(a) Onslow County will rely on appropriate state and federal agencies to
implement this policy. ,
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
(b) Onslow County will adopt a local ordinance to require the preparation of i
environmental impact statements for on -shore support facilities for off -shore
drilling operations.
Schedule: FY2003.
Community Facilities (Issue discussed, pages 1-84, 1-96, II-12, and II-18)
Policy: Onslow County supports expansion and improvement of its community facilities.
IV-18 I

Implementation:
(a) During the planning period, Onslow County will develop a community
services/facilities plan (as a stand-alone document, not as an expansion of
this plan), which will define existing deficiencies in police protection, fire
protection, local administrative buildings, public recreational facilities, public
shoreline access, and public parks. This plan will not address school
system needs. The plan will prioritize needs and make specific
recommendations concerning financing and budgeting the high priority
needs.
Schedule: FY2003.
(b) The county will coordinate facility planning with the school system and the
municipalities. All substantial reconstruction and new construction shall
comply with the State Building Code and the Southern Building Congress
International Code.
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
Redevelopment of Developed Areas (Issue discussed, page II-20)
Policy (a): The county permits redevelopment of previously developed areas, provided all
applicable policies, regulations, and ordinances are complied with. The county
encourages redevelopment as a means for correcting housing problems, upgrading
commercial structures and historic preservation (through rehabilitation and adaptive
reuse).
Policy (b): If redevelopment occurs within a zoned area, the density controls in the zoning
ordinance and subdivision ordinance are adequate to control growth intensity.
Policy (c): The county encourages relocation of structures endangered by erosion, if the
relocated structure will be in compliance with all applicable policies and regulations.
Implementation:
(a) The county will support the development and enforcement of a Minimum
Housing Code.
Schedule (a): FY2002.
(b) The county will apply for Community Development Block Grant Community
Revitalization funds.
(c) The county will coordinate redevelopment efforts with the Onslow County
Building Compliance Division.
Schedule (b) - (c): Continuing Activities.
(d) The county will prepare a county -wide housing strategy to increase the
quantity and quality of affordable housing.
Schedule (d): FY2004.
IV-19

Land Use Regulation/Urban Growth Patterns (Issue discussed, pages 1-36 and II-6)
Policy (a): County policy shall be to encourage urban development in or near Jacksonville,
Richlands, Swansboro, Holly Ridge, and North Topsail Beach and other growth
areas, and specifically in areas that are or could be served by urban services, such
as water and sewer. The county will continue to provide assistance where
financially feasible to redevelop or upgrade older or deteriorated areas through
state or federal programs.
Policy (b): Onslow County will permit residential development to occur in response to market
needs provided that the following criteria are met:
(1) Due respect is offered to all aspects of the environment.
(2) If deficient community facilities and services are identified, the county
should attempt to improve such to the point of adequately meeting
demands.
(3) Additional residential development should concurrently involve planning for
improvements to community facilities and services if excess capacity does
not exist within those facilities and services.
(4) Residential development is consistent with other county policies and the
land classification map as contained in this plan update.
Policy (c): Onslow County will protect existing residential base; discourage overbuilding and
encourage upgrading of community facilities and services.
Policy (d): Onslow County will encourage quality development reflecting the spectrum of
housing needs; from low -end (affordable) residences to high -end (luxury)
residences, reflecting the local market and out -of -area resort/residential market.
Policy (e): Onslow County will limit "strip" residential development along highways and certain
roads carrying heavy traffic and encourage service roads or an internal street
pattern to eliminate direct driveway connections to highways and roads.
Policy (f):
Policy (g):
Policy (h):
Onslow County will encourage larger lots in conservation classified areas through
enforcement of the county subdivision and zoning ordinance in zoned areas.
Residential growth shall be regulated to coincide with the provision of public
facilities and services.
Building heights
ensure building
capabilities.
shall be limited as a means for controlling density and to help
configurations that do not exceed the county's fire fighting
Policy (i): Onslow County will encourage the installation of wastewater collection and off -site
treatment facilities concurrently with imposition of density controls upon the system
service area, to help prevent overburdening of the system.
1
1
I
1
IV-20

fl
Implementation:
(a)
Continued enforcement of County Subdivision Regulations, Manufactured
Home Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance in zoned areas, Flood Damage
Prevention Ordinance, Planned Unit Development provisions of the
Subdivision Regulations, NC State Building Code, and Onslow County Sign
Ordinance.
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
t(b)
Jurisdiction of the County Zoning Ordinance should be expanded county-
wide with staff resources provided to enforce the ordinance.
Schedule: FY2000-2005.
(c)
Development of a county -wide campground ordinance.
Schedule: FY2003.
(d)
Upgrading those public facilities and services that are either at or near
design capacity.
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
(e)
The Onslow County Planning Board and Board of Commissioners will
consider the following in deliberation of all zoning petitions in zoned areas:
(1) All uses which are allowed in a zoning district must be considered.
A decision to rezone or not to rezone a parcel or parcels of property
cannot be based on consideration of only one use or a partial list of
the uses allowed within a zoning district.
(2) Zoning decisions will not be based on aesthetic considerations.
(3) Request for zoning changes will not be approved if the requested
change will result in spot zoning. Spot zoning is a form of
discriminatory zoning whose sole purpose is to serve the private
interests of one or more landowners instead of furthering the
welfare of the entire community as part of an overall zoning plan.
Although changing the zoning classification of any parcel of land to
'
permit a more intensive use could possibly constitute spot zoning,
the test lies in its relationship to the existing zoning pattern and
guidelines of the local comprehensive plan. Spot zoning is based
on the arbitrary and inappropriate nature of a rezoning change
rather than, as is commonly believed, in the size of the area being
rezoned.
' (4) Zoning which will result in strip development will be discouraged.
Strip development is a melange of development, usually
commercial, extending along both sides of a major street. Strip
development is often a mixture of auto -oriented enterprises (e.g.,
I IV-21

gas stations, motels, and food stands), truck -dependent wholesaling ,
and light industrial enterprises along with the once -rural homes and
farms that await conversion to commercial use. Strip development
may severely reduce traffic -carrying capacity of abutting streets.
(5) The concept of uniformity will be supported in all zoning
deliberations. Uniformity is a basic premise of zoning which holds
that all land in similar circumstances should be zoned alike; any
different treatment must be justified by showing different
circumstances.
(6) Zoning regulations will be made in accordance with the Onslow
County Land Use Plan and designed to lessen congestion in the
streets, to secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, to
promote health and the general welfare; to provide adequate light
and air; to prevent the overcrowding of land; to avoid undue
concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision
of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks, and other public
requirements. The regulations shall be made with reasonable
consideration, among other things, as to the character of the district
and its peculiar suitability for particular uses, and with a view to
conserving the value of property and encouraging the most
appropriate use of land throughout the Onslow County planning
jurisdiction.
(7) Specifically, the Planning Board and Board of Commissioners
should ask the following questions:
-- Does the county need more land in the zone class
requested?
-- Is there other property in the community that might be more
i
appropriate for this use?
-- Is the request in accordance with the county's
comprehensive plan?
-- Will the request have a serious impact on traffic circulation,
parking space, sewer and water services, and other utilities?
-- Is there a good possibility that the request, as proposed, will
result in lessening the enjoyment or use of adjacent
properties?
-- Will the request, as proposed, cause serious noise, odors,
light, activity, or unusual disturbances?
-- Does the request raise serious legal questions such as spot
zoning, hardship, violation of precedents, or need for this
type of use?
IV-22

-- Will the proposed zoning damage areas be classified as
Conservation?
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
Estuarine Access (Issue discussed, page 1-87 and II-13)
Policy:. Onslow County supports expansion of its shoreline access facilities.
Implementation:
(a) Onslow County will apply for CAMA and other funding to assist in financing
the funding of a shoreline access plan.
(b) Onslow County supports the state's shoreline access policies as set forth
in NCAC Chapter 15, Subchapter 7M. The county will conform to CAMA
and other state and federal environmental regulations affecting the
development of estuarine access areas.
Schedule (a) - (b): Continuing Activities.
NOTE: Also refer to the Recreation Resources Policies on page IV-11.
Wipes and Locations of Desired Industry (Issue discussed, pages 1-42 and 11-8)
' Industrial development is extremely important to the continued economic growth and stability of
Onslow County. The county's heavy reliance on employment in the service, retail trade, and
government sectors should be balanced by the development of a stronger base of
industrial/manufacturing employment. However, the county desires to achieve responsible
industrial development which will not adversely affect the natural environment or the quality of
established residential areas.
' Policy (a): Onslow County encourages the development of industrial sites which are
accessible to municipal/central water and sewer services.
Policy (b): Industrial development should occur in areas classified as urban transition and
limited transition. Industries generating only domestic sewage are acceptable in
' areas classified as community and rural with services. The county does not
oppose industries locating within rural classified areas if they have approved
applicable state permits for water supply and sewage disposal systems.
Policy (c): Industries which are noxious by reason of the emission of smoke, dust, glare,
noise, odor, and vibrations, and those which deal primarily in hazardous products
such as explosives, should not be located in Onslow County.
Policy (d): Onslow County encourages the location of industries in "industrial park" settings.
Policy (e): Industry should be located in conformance with the county's land use plan.
IV-23

Implementation:
(a) The county will develop industrial park standards to be incorporated into the
county's zoning ordinance. Industrial park development will be encouraged
in areas zoned for industrial development.
Schedule: FY2001.
(b) As stated elsewhere in this policy section, the county will pursue expansion
of its zoning ordinance to include the entire county. This will enhance the
county's ability to regulate the location/development of industry.
Schedule: FY2000-2005.
Commitment to State and Federal Programs (Issue discussed, numerous references to state and ,
local programs throughout this plan)
Policy: Onslow County is receptive to state and federal programs, particularly those which
provide improvements to the county.
Implementation: County officials will continue to support state and federal
programs that will benefit the county and its citizens. Onslow County will continue
to fully support such programs, especially the North Carolina Department of
Transportation road and bridge improvement programs, which are very important
to Onslow County.
Examples of other state and federal programs that are important to and supported ,
by Onslow County include, but are not limited to: drainage planning and erosion
control activities carried out by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, which
is valuable to farmers; dredging and channel maintenance by the US Army Corps
of Engineers; federal and state projects which provide efficient and safe boat
access for commercial and sport fishing; and community development block grants,
low -to -moderate income housing, housing rehabilitation, and North Carolina I
Housing Finance Agency housing improvement programs.
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
Assistance in Channel Maintenance (Issue discussed, page 1-68 and II-16)
Policy: County officials will continue to work with the Army Corps of Engineers and any
,
other state and federal agencies to ensure continued dredging and maintenance
of channels and rivers as needed to keep these facilities open to navigation.
These efforts shall comply with applicable state and federal regulations. Providing
,
borrow or spoil areas and provision of easements for work will be determined on
case -by -case basis. The county would encourage spoil material being placed on
those areas where easements for such use already exist. Channel maintenance
has major economic significance and is worthy of state and federal funding.
Implementation: The county will rely on the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to
implement this policy.
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
IV-24

Assistance in Interstate Waterways (Issue discussed, page 1-68 and II-16)
Policy: Onslow County considers the interstate waterway to be a valuable economic asset.
Channel maintenance has major economic significance and is worthy of state and
federal funding.
fImplementation:
(a) The county will provide assistance in maintaining the waterway by helping
' to obtain or providing dredge spoil sites and, when possible, providing
easements across county -owned property for work.
' (b) Onslow County will rely on the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to implement
this policy.
Schedule(a) - (b): Continuing Activities.
Tourism (Issue discussed, page 1-30)
Policy: Tourism is extremely important to Onslow County and will be supported by the
county.
Implementation:
(a) Onslow County will continue to support the activities of the North Carolina
Division of Travel and Tourism; specifically, the monitoring of tourism -
related industry, efforts to promote tourism -related commercial activity, and
efforts to enhance and provide shoreline resources.
(b) Onslow County will continue to support the activities of the Onslow County
Department of Tourism..
(c) Onslow County will support projects that will increase public access to
shoreline areas.
(d) Onslow County will support North Carolina Department of Transportation
projects to improve access to and within the county.
1 Schedule (a) - (d): Continuing Activities.
Transportation (Issue discussed, pages 1-43 and II-14)
Policy: Onslow County supports transportation improvements which will improve highway
safety, regional accessibility, and traffic flow within the county.
Implementation:
(a) Onslow County will request and support the development of a county -wide
thoroughfare plan.
Schedule (a): FY2000-2005.
1
IV-25

I.
,
(b) Onslow County supports the following
priorities for
highway transportation
improvements (* indicates intrastate
project):
LENGTH
'
(MI)
ROUTE/CITY ID NO.
LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
(KM)
SCHEDULE
US 17 R-2405"
1-40 at Wilmington to east
23.4
Design 1997-98
corporate limits of Holly Ridge.
37.7
Right-of-way 1997-98
Widen roadway to multi -lanes,
Construction 1997-01
part on new location.
US 17 R-2406"
East corporate limits of Holly
17.0
Construction 1997-99
,
Ridge to four lane section south
27.4
of Jacksonville. Four lane
divided facility with a bypass
,
east of Verona.
US 17 R-2514•
Multi -lanes north of Jacksonville
21.0
Planning 1997
to multi -lanes south of New Bern.
33.8
Design 1997-03
Widen roadway to multi -lanes
Right-of-way 1999-03
with bypasses of Belgrade,
Construction 2001-03
Maysville, and Pollocksville on
new location.
NC 24 R-2105"
Swansboro to US 70 at
19.4 .
Planning 1997
Morehead City. Widen roadway
31.2
Design 1997-99
to multi -lanes.
Right-of-way 1997-99
Construction 1997-01
NC 111 R-2708
US 258-NC 24 to Albert Ellis
5.1
Identified future need
Airport. Upgrade existing
8.2
,
roadway or provide new access.
US 258 R-2235
NC 24 near Richlands to US 70
24.9
Identified future need
at Kinston. Widen to a four lane
40.1
divided facility.
SR 1308 R-2621
Gum Branch Road, US 258-NC
24 in Richlands to SR 1336 in
7.5
12.1
Identified future need
Jacksonville. Widen roadway to
a multi -lane facility.
Jacksonville U-2107"
Jacksonville bypass, US 17
4.4
Design 1997-01
South to US 17 North. Four lane
7.1
Right-of-way 1997-01
divided facility on new location.
Construction 1997-03
Jacksonville U-2107A
Jacksonville bypass, US 258-NC
0.8
Design 1997-00
'
24 to US 17 South. Four lane
1.3
Right-of-way 1998-00
divided facility on new location.
Construction 2000-03
Jacksonville U-2540
SR 1308 (Bell Fork Road), NC
2.1
Identified future need
24 to US 17. Widen roadway to a
3.4
five lane curb and gutter facility.
Jacksonville U-3439
US 17 relocation, Jacksonville
—
Identified future need
byp. (U-2107) northward. Four
,
lane divided facility on new
Jacksonville U-3616
location.
Western Boulevard, US 17 to SR
4.0
Planning 1999-00
,
1308 (Gum Branch Road).
6.4
Design 2000-02
Widen roadway to a multi -lane
Right-of-way 2002
facility.
Construction 2003
'
IV-26
'

it
1
1
LENGTH
(MI)
ROUTE/CITY
ID NO.
LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
(KM)
SCHEDULE
NC 50
B-3008
Juniper Creek. Replace bridge
—
Right-of-way 1999
No. 16
Construction 2000
SR 1101
B-2938
White Oak River. Replace bridge
—
Right-of-way 1999
SR 1442
No. 49
Construction 2000
SR 1225
B-2157
Branch of New River. Replace
--
Under Construction
bridge No. 49
SR 1332
B-3009
White Oak River. Replace bridge
—
Construction 1999
SR 1118
No. 9
SR 1406
B-3215
Northeast Creek. Replace bridge
—
Right-of-way 1998
No. 119
Construction 1999
SR 1406
B-3216
Northeast Creek. Replace bridge
—
Right-of-way 1998
No. 118
Construction 1999
SR 1423
B-3682
Little Northeast Creek. Replace
—
Right-of-way 2002
bridge No. 3
Construction 2003
SR 1503
B-3217
Bear Creek. Replace bridge No.
—
Right-of-way 2000
21
Construction 2001
SR 1509
B-3358
Parrot Swamp. Replace bridge
--
Right-of-way 2000
No. 91
Construction 2001
Jacksonville
E-3406
NC (Freedom Trail/Johnson
—
Under Construction
Boulevard). Intersection
improvements for bicyclist
safety.
Jacksonville
E-3407
Northern US 17 rail trail, Phase
3.1
Scheduled for
1: Onslow Drive to Kellum. Rail
5.0
Feasibility Study
Trail
SR 1423
W 3413
North of SR 1411 to SR 1413.
—
Identified future need
Improve horizontal curvature of
roadway.
SR 1406
Z-3426A
Near Jacksonville at Southern
-
Funded - Construction
Railroad Crossing 641 699J.
not authorized
Safety improvements
SR 1428
Z-36031
Near Hubert at Norfolk Southern
—
Construction 1997
Railway Crossing 722 900K.
Safety improvements
SR 1432
Z-2926C
Near Swansboro at Camp
—
Funded - Construction
Lejeune Crossing 722 899T.
not authorized
Install automatic warning
devices.
Schedule (b): Continuing Activities.
IV-27

(c) Onslow County supports the following priorities for airport transportation
improvements at the Albert Ellis Airport:
Project Description
Year
Total Cost
Sanitary Sewer Line to County Facility
1998
$750,000
Rehabilitate Maintenance Hangar Roof
1998
$25,000
Access Road Pavement Marking
1998
$4,000
Runway 5-23 Joint Sealing & Marking
1998
$190,000
General Aviation Terminal
1999
$250,000
General Aviation Parking
1999
$88,100
Runway 23 Runup Apron
1999
$350,000
T-Hangar Taxilane
2000
$200,000
ARFF Vehicle
2001
$500,000
Rehabilitate Runway 5-23
2002
$1,590,000
Schedule (c): FY1998-2002.
Land Use Trends (Issue discussed, Section I - Existing Land Use)
Onslow County's land use trends are discussed in Section I.D - Existing Land Use. The policies
contained in this section address the following key land use issues/problems:
-- Development of "404" wetlands.
— Expansion of central water and sewer areas.
-- Increasing traffic congestion, in particular along US 17 and NC 24.
-- Continued support of economic/industrial development.
-- Development of an industrial park.
-- Establishment of county -wide zoning pursuant to voter approval by referendum.
-- Development of a new solid waste disposal facility.
-- Support of the Marine Corps Air Station at New River and the Albert Ellis Airport.
-- Intergovernmental cooperation, coordination, and planning.
-- Expansion of county -wide recreational opportunities.
-- Reduction of the county's number of substandard dwelling units.
-- Low elevation and sea level rise.
IV-28

-- Regulation of "non -point" sources of water pollution in accordance with state
regulations, as amended.
-- Control of development in fragile and other areas of environmental concern.
' -- Regulation of "corporate" farms and increased run-off of agricultural drainage.
The county should review all local ordinances to ensure that adequate provisions exist to address
' these issues/problems.
' E. CONTINUING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION POLICIES
Onslow County recognizes that a basic element in developing and implementing a land use plan
is the successful involvement of a jurisdiction's citizenry in the development of the plan. As the
1 initial step in the preparation of this document, a "Public Participation Plan" was adopted. The
plan outlined the methodology for citizen involvement (see Appendix III). Public involvement was
to be generated through public information meetings, advertising in local newspapers, and
meetings with both the Planning Board and Board of Commissioners.
The Onslow County Planning Board was instrumental in the development of this plan. Input was
provided by the Planning Board to guide plan development. The following individuals served as
members of the Planning Board: J. W. Thomason; Jack Hurst; Bill W. Lear; Melvin Shepard, Jr.;
Dana Dunn; Winton Southerland; and Robert Mills.
A public information meeting was conducted at the outset of the project. This meeting was held
at the Summersill Building on February 17, 1997. Subsequently, meetings of the Planning Board
to discuss the land use plan update were held on March 6, 1997; May 1, 1997; June 5, 1997; July
28, 1997; August 4, 1997; September 15, 1997; October 7, 1997; October 15, 1997, and January
14, 1998. The Onslow County Board of Commissioner members were notified of and invited to
' attend all planning board meetings. All meetings were advertised and were open to the public.
The draft plan was submitted to the Onslow County Planning Board on July 27, 1998. The
document was approved by the Planning Board on July 27,1998, for submission to the Division
of Coastal Management.
The preliminary plan was submitted to the Division of Coastal Management for comment in July,
' 1998. Following receipt of DCM comments, the plan was amended and a formal public hearing
on the final document was conducted on February 7, 2000. The public hearing was advertised
in the Jacksonville Daily News on January 6, 2000. The plan was approved by the Onslow County
' Board of Commissioners on February 11, 2000 and submitted to the Coastal Resources
Commission for certification. The plan was certified on March 24, 2000.
Onslow County believes that this citizen participation effort has been effective and adequate.
Continued citizen input will continue to be solicited, primarily through the Planning Board, and with
advertised and adequately publicized public meetings held to discuss special land use issues and
' to keep citizens informed.
' IV-29

F. STORM HAZARD MITIGATION, POST -DISASTER RECOVERY, AND EVACUATION
PLANS
The purpose of a storm hazard mitigation plan is to assist the county in managing development
in potentially hazardous areas through establishing storm hazard mitigation policies and to reduce
the risks associated with severe storms and hurricanes by developing post -disaster ,
reconstruction/recovery policies. The following provides the Onslow County Storm Hazard
Mitigation, Post -Disaster Recovery, and Evacuation Plan.
STORM HAZARD MITIGATION POLICIES '
The effect of storm related flooding in Onslow County is discussed on pages 1-60 and 1-62 of the ,
Land Use Plan, and areas subject to flooding are shown on Map 7, page 1-61. The most severely
affected sections of the county during a major storm would be the areas adjacent to the
Intracoastal Waterway and the shoreline areas along the White Oak River, New River, and Bear
Creek. It is estimated that less than ten percent of the land area under Onslow County's planning
jurisdiction would be subjected to storm related flooding.
Hazard mitigation, or actions taken to reduce the probability or impact of a disaster, could involve
a number of activities or policy decisions. The starting point, however, is to identify the types of
hazards (including the relative severity and magnitude of risks), and the extent of development
(including residential, commercial, etc.) located in storm hazard areas.
Hurricanes are extremely powerful, often unpredictable forces of nature. The four causes of
fatalities and property damage are high winds, flooding, wave action, and erosion. Two of these, I
high winds and flooding, apply to Onslow County.
a. High Winds I
High winds are the major determinants of a hurricane, by definition, i.e., a tropical disturbance with
sustained winds of at least 73 miles per hour. Extreme hurricanes can have winds of up to 165
miles per hour, with gusts up to 200 miles per hour.
These winds circulate around the center or "eye" of the storm. Although the friction or impact of '
the winds hitting land from the water causes some dissipation of the full force, there is still a
tremendous amount of energy left to cause damage to buildings, overturn mobile homes, down
trees and power lines, and destroy crops. Also, tornadoes are often spawned by hurricane wind '
patterns. Wind stress, therefore, is an important consideration in storm hazard mitigation
planning.
b. Flooding '
The excessive amounts of rainfall and the "storm surge" which often accompany hurricanes can
cause massive coastal and riverine flooding causing excessive property damage and deaths by '
drowning. (More deaths are caused by drowning than any other cause in hurricanes.) Only
Onslow County coastal and river shorelines are subject to storm related flood damage.
Consideration of potential flood damage is important to Onslow County's efforts to develop storm ,
mitigation policies.
IV-30 '

C. Policy Statements: Storm Hazard Mitigation
In order to minimize the damage potentially caused by the effects of a hurricane or other major
storm, Onslow County proposes the following policies:
' High Winds
Onslow County supports enforcement of the NC State Building Code. The county will
continue to enforce the State Building Code on wind resistant construction with design
standards of 110 mph wind loads.
' Flooding
Onslow County is an active participant in the National Flood Insurance program and is
supportive of hazard mitigation elements. The county is participating in the regular phase
of the insurance program. This program is administered locally by the Onslow County
Inspections Department. The county also supports continued enforcement of the CAMA
and 404 Wetlands development permit processes in areas potentially susceptible to
flooding. When reviewing development proposals, the county will work to reduce density
in areas susceptible to flooding. In addition, the county will encourage the public purchase
of land in the most hazardous areas.
Mitigation Policies Related to Redevelopment of Hazard Areas After a Storm
' Reconstruction of damaged properties in Onslow County after a storm will be subject to
the following:
' " The North Carolina Building Code requires any building damaged
in excess of 50 percent of its value to conform with code
requirements for new buildings when repaired. (This will be
' particularly beneficial in the event of wind damage.)
"The Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance requires that all existing
structures must comply with requirements related to elevation above
the 100-year floodplain elevation and floodproofing if they are
substantially improved. A substantial improvement is defined as
'any repair, reconstruction, or improvement of a building, the cost of
iwhich equals or exceeds 50 percent of the market value of the
building either before the improvement or repair is started, or before
damage occurred if the building has been damaged'."
' Evacuation Plans
' The county will coordinate evacuation planning with all county agencies and municipalities.
Onslow County will encourage motels, condominiums, and multi -family developments (five
or more dwelling units) to post evacuation instructions that identify routes and the locations
' of available public shelters. The county will update an evacuation route map annually.
Copies will be kept at the County Administration Building in Jacksonville for free distribution
to the public.
I V-31

Implementation: Storm Hazard Mitigation
(a) Onslow County will continue to enforce the standards of the State Building Code. '
(b) The county will continue to support enforcement of state and federal programs
which aid in mitigation of hurricane hazards, including CAMA, the US Army Corps '
of Engineers 404 permit process, FEMA, and local ordinances such as zoning and
flood damage prevention regulations.
(c) The county will discourage high density development in high hazard areas through r
implementation of the county's Zoning, Subdivision, and Mobile Home Park
Ordinances.
(d) Onslow County supports the public acquisition of high hazard areas with state and
federal funds when voluntary acquisition can be accomplished. The county
discourages condemnation of land for this purpose.
(e) Developed structures which were destroyed or sustained "major damage" and
which did not conform to the county's building regulations, zoning ordinances, and
other storm hazard mitigation policies, i.e., basic measures to reduce damage by
high winds, flooding, wave action or erosion, must be repaired or redeveloped
according to those policies. In some instances, this may mean relocation of ,
construction, or no reconstruction at all. Building permits to restore destroyed or
"major" damaged structures which were built in conformance with the county's
building code and county storm hazard mitigation policies shall be issued ,
automatically. All structures suffering major damage will be repaired according to
the State Building Code and county Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance. All
structures suffering minor damage, regardless of location, will be allowed to be I
rebuilt to the original condition prior to the storm.
STORM HAZARD MITIGATION, POST -DISASTER RECOVERY AND EVACUATION PLANS
Onslow County has a detailed storm hazard mitigation, post -disaster recovery and evacuation
plan. The document, entitled Onslow County Hurricane Plan, was prepared by Onslow County '
Emergency Management. The plan underwent a thorough rewrite in 1996/1997 following
Hurricanes Bertha and Fran.
The Onslow County Hurricane Plan provides guidance to government officials and emergency
response agencies. It outlines specific responsibilities and provides additional information in the
event of an actual hurricane or threat. This plan was developed to protect life and minimize
property damage while providing essential services to the extent possible. The plan includes ,
policies for the repair or replacement of public infrastructure.
The Onslow County Hurricane Plan does not apply within the corporate limits of any municipality '
or within any area of the county over which the municipality has jurisdiction to enact general police
power ordinances unless the municipality by resolution consents to its application, in which event,
it shall apply to such areas as fully and to the same extent as elsewhere in the county. '
IV-32 '

1
1
1
1
1
Plan Organization
Hurricane response involves all areas under county and municipal jurisdiction. As joint action is
required of Onslow County and the municipal governments within the county, a joint organization
for decision making and use of resources is needed. For these purposes a Control Group and
Support Group exist and function as defined.
A. Control Group: The function of the Control Group is to exercise overall direction and
control of hurricane response operations in unincorporated areas and within the
municipalities including decisions to implement increased readiness conditions county-
wide, and other actions necessary to the situation. The Onslow County Control Group
consists of the following:
1. Chairman, Board of Commissioners (representing all commissioners)
2. Municipal Mayors or their designees.
3. County Emergency Management Coordinator.
B. Support Group: The function of the Support Group is to provide personnel and resources
for the implementation of pre -planned actions, as well as those actions directed by the
Control Group, and to provide information, data, and recommendations to the Control
Group. The Support Group consists of the following:
1. County Manager
10.
Public Affairs Director
2. Deputy County Manager
11.
Red Cross Director
3. Asst. County Manager -Finance
12.
NC Forest Service
4. Asst. County Manager -Public Works
13.
EMS Director
5. Social Services Director
14.
Municipal managers
6. School Superintendent
15.
Council on Aging
7. Health Director
16.
Sheriff
8. NC Department of Transportation
17.
NC Highway Patrol
9. Tax Administrator
Plan Purpose and Scope
A. Purpose: This plan has been developed to provide for an orderly and coordinated
evacuation to minimize the effects of hurricanes on residents and visitors in Onslow
County. The plan provides for alerting of key officials, the evacuation of the public from
high risk areas, and the designation of shelters for evacuees. It also provides for the
reentry into evacuated areas when appropriate.
B. Scope: The Onslow County Hurricane Plan is limited in nature because it is a single
purpose contingency plan. This plan will guide the most effective response to minimize
physical damage, injury, and loss of life in the event of a hurricane threat.
Authorities
-- North Carolina General Statute, Chapter 166
— Onslow County Emergency Preparedness Ordinance
-- Onslow County State of Emergency Ordinance
IV-33

References
-- Onslow County Emergency Operations Plan
-- Onslow County and American Red Cross Agreement
-- Eastern North Carolina Hurricane Evacuation Restudy - still pending
-- A Guide to the Development of Local Emergency Operations Plans (NCEM)
A complete copy of the plan is available in the Onslow County Office of Emergency Management.
The following agencies, departments, and units of government participated in the preparation of
this plan:
Onslow County Board of Commissioners
Jacksonville City Manager
North Topsail Beach Town Manager
Holly Ridge Town Manager
Richlands Town Manager
Swansboro Town Manager
American Red Cross
The Salvation Army
Superintendent of Schools
Sheriff
Sprint Telephone
Onslow Memorial Hospital
Marine Corps Base Operations
Marine Corps Air Station New River
All County Departments
All Volunteer Fire Departments
All Volunteer Rescue Squads
NC Highway Patrol
NC Department of Transportation
Jones-Onslow EMC
Carolina Power and Light
IV-34

SECTION V: RELATIONSHIP OF POLICIES AND LAND CLASSIFICATION
1
The 15A NCAC 7B planning guidelines require that the Onslow County Land Use Plan relate the
' policies section to the land classification map and provide an indication of the land uses
considered appropriate in each land classification.
Ll
nl
u
A. URBAN TRANSITION
Areas classified urban transition will provide lands to accommodate future urban growth within the
planning period. The average development densities will be less than the developed class
densities and greater than the limited transition class densities. These areas may be able to
support urban development by being generally free of physical limitations and be served or
accessible to service by urban services. Development may include mixed land uses such as
single and multi -family residential, commercial, institutional, transportation, industrial, and other
uses at high to moderate densities. Urban services should include water, sewer (including land
application treatment systems), streets, police, and fire protection. The urban transition areas are
generally located between Jacksonville's planning jurisdiction and Highways SR 1324 and SR
1410-1411; west of Jacksonville's planning jurisdiction along segments of US 258 and NC 50; and
east of SR 1243, SR 1212 and SR 1113.
B. LIMITED TRANSITION
The limited transition classification provides for controlled development with some urban services.
This classification includes those areas along both sides of NC 24 north of the Marine Base and
east to the Intracoastal Waterway, within the area surrounded by US 17 - SR 1113 - SR 1212 -
NC 53 - SR 1107 - SR 1119, and generally within the area south of the New River bounded on
the north by the Marine Base, on the south by the Intracoastal Waterway, and on the west by SR
1518 and SR 1531 (excluding the NC 210/NC 172 community area). This classification will require
the development of some urban services including water and sewer utilities. The predominant
land use will be moderate density residential development. However, other urban land uses
including the following will be allowed: commercial, public and semi-public, multi -family residential,
service, office, institutional, commercial, and light industrial.
C. COMMUNITY
Moderate density development, three dwelling units per acre or less, will be allowed in this
classification. Water and sewer utilities should be provided to eliminate health hazards. Land
uses will be limited to single and multi -family residential usage and commercial/service uses
necessary to support residential development. Support uses shall include: general and
convenience stores, public facilities, health care facilities, service facilities, and offices. The
community class may include some light industrial development. The community classifications
are located in the areas surrounding the NC 210/NC 172 intersection, Silverdale, Belgrade, and
Catherine Lake.
V-1

D. RURAL WITH SERVICES I
The rural with services classification provides for very low density land uses, including residential, '
where limited water services are provided in order to avert an existing or projected health problem.
Central sewer service may be provided. The areas included are those which are expected to be
provided water service during the planning. All areas not otherwise classified are included within '
the rural with services classification. This classification supports expansion of the county's water
system. Other services such as volunteer fire protection, rescue service, health care facilities, and
government services to include prisons are allowed. Business and industrial development uses '
and activities should be allowed. All uses allowed by 15A NCAC 7H will be permitted.
E. RURAL '
The rural class is the broadest of the land classes and is designated to provide for agriculture,
forest management, mineral extraction, and other low intensity areas. Residences may be located '
within the rural class where urban services are not required and where natural resources will not
be permanently impaired. Central water and sewer may be available within this classification.
Some large developments may be encouraged in the rural class when there is an absence of
otherwise suitable land within the developed and transition classes and/or when there is a possible
adverse development. Such large developments or uses include industrial parks, land application
sewer systems, and power plants. Public facilities, health care facilities, businesses, on -site water '
and septic tank use, industrial uses, hazardous or noxious uses, and government services to
include prisons are allowed. In addition, all uses allowed by 15A NCAC 7H will be permitted. The
only area of the county classified as rural is an area located between the Onslow-Pender County ,
line and NC 50.
F. CONSERVATION I
The conservation classes are designated to provide for effective long-term management of '
significant limited or irreplaceable areas which include the following categories: natural resource
fragile areas, coastal wetlands, 404 wetlands, estuarine shorelines, ORW estuarine shorelines,
primary nursery areas, and estuarine and public trust waters. Policy statements under Resource
Production and Resource Production and Management in Section IV of this plan address the
county's intentions under this classification. The locations of this classification are show on Map
14. Except for signage, mooring fields, floating homes, and the policy requiring pump -outs for all
new marinas, all uses allowed by 15A NCAC 7H will be permitted.
11

= m = = = = = = = = = m m = m = =

' APPENDIX
t ONSLOW COUNTY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENTS
ISO RATINGS
'
Stations #
Department
1998 Rating
1992 Rating
1
Back Swamp
6
9s
2
Bear Creek
6
9s
3
Belgrade
6
9s
'
5
Half Moon
6
6
6
Haws Run
9s
9s
7
Holly Ridge
7/9s
8/9
8
Hubert
6
9s
'
9
Nine Mile
9s
9s
'
11
Piney Green
9s
9s
12
Pumpkin Center
7
9s
'
13
Rhodestown
7
9s
14
Richlands
5/9s
8/9
15
Sneads Ferry
6
9s
16
Southwest
5
9s
17
Swansboro
5
8/9
18
Turkey Point
6
9s
'
19
Verona
6
6
20
White Oak
6
9s
'
23
Loco
9s
9s
24*
North Topsail
6
9s
NOTE:
'
s = State Inspected
8/9 = (8) Municipal Rating/ (9) County Rating
' *Serves only the incorporated area of North Topsail Beach.
Source: Onslow County Emergency Management

APPENDIX II
POLICIES CONSIDERED BUT NOT ADOPTED
B. RESOURCE PROTECTION POLICY STATEMENTS
Physical Limitations
Soils
To mitigate existing septic tank problems and other restrictions on development posed by soil
limitations, Onslow County will:
-- Onslow County will permit development only in those land areas having soil characteristics
suitable for the intended uses. Septic tank filter field suitability is regarded as the most
important soil characteristic that could be a constraint to development. Development is not
permitted on land that does not have soil suitable for septic tanks, or does not have access
to a central wastewater collection and treatment system. The county encourages the use
of off -site treatment facilities in the development of land having marginal soil conditions.
(92)*
-- Onslow County does not oppose the installation of package treatment plants and septic
tanks or discharge of waste in any areas classified as coastal wetlands, freshwater
wetlands (404), or natural heritage areas.
-- Onslow County will cooperate with the US Army Corps of Engineers in the regulation/
enforcement of the 404 wetlands permit process.
-- Onslow County will cooperate with the US Army Corps of Engineers in the regulation/
enforcement of the 404 wetlands permit process. However, additional wetlands
regulations will not be supported or locally imposed by the county.
-- Onslow County strongly objects to stringent enforcement of the 404 wetlands regulations
' by the US Army Corps of Engineers. Enforcement of the program and permit process is
jeopardizing economic development in the county and interfering with sound and
reasonable agricultural operations and production. Onslow County supports reduction of
' the 404 wetlands regulations by the federal government, and objects to the establishment
of any state 404 or freshwater wetlands regulations.
-- The county supports protection and preservation of wetlands (freshwater, marshes, "404"
and pocosins). Development within wetlands shall be consistent with all local, state, and
federal restrictions. (92)
' Flood Hazard Areas
-- Onslow County will continue to enforce its existing zoning and flood damage prevention
ordinances and follow the storm hazard mitigation plan contained herein.
Groundwater/Protection of Potable Water Supplies
-- It is the policy of Onslow County to protect and beneficially develop its groundwater
resources. (92)

-- Onslow County will encourage and support water conservation efforts. '
-- Onslow County's water system is supplied by a series of wells. Land uses near '
groundwater sources are regulated by the North Carolina Division of Environmental
Management through 15A NCAC Subchapters 2L and 2C. Onslow County recognizes
the importance of protecting potable water supplies and therefore supports the '
enforcement of these regulations. The county may also consider adopting controls
which will discourage development that may encroach upon these wells.
Manmade Hazards ,
-- To the extent practicable, it is county policy to mitigate hazardous land uses, ,
operations, and activities. (92)
Stormwater Runoff
-- Stormwater runoff associated with agriculture, residential, and nonresidential '
development can have significant detrimental impacts upon coastal wetlands, surface
waters, or other fragile areas. It is county policy to protect these areas from '
detrimental impacts of agriculture and development activities. (92)
Cultural/Historic Resources I
-- Onslow County shall coordinate all housing code enforcement/redevelopment projects
with the NC Division of Archives and History, to ensure that any significant I
architectural details or buildings are identified and preserved.
-- Onslow County will coordinate all county public works projects with the NC Division '
of Archives and History, to ensure the identification and preservation of significant
archaeological sites.
Industrial Impacts on Fragile Areas ,
-- Except as may be expressly allowed elsewhere in this plan, no industrial development
of any type shall be located in lands classified as coastal wetlands, freshwater ,
wetlands, and Natural Heritage Areas.
-- Industry may be located anywhere in Onslow County if it meets all applicable state, '
local, and federal regulations.
-- Industrial development which can comply with the use standards specified by 15A ,
NCAC 7H and applicable ORW management plans may be located within conservation
classified areas. Onslow County aggressively encourages the development of industry.
The development of a diversified economic base and jobs are important to a stable '
future for Onslow County. The county does not want any policies contained within
this plan to prohibit industrial development which meets all applicable state and federal
regulations. The county objects to enforcement of the 404 wetlands permitting
process by the US Army Corps of Engineers preventing any industrial development.
However, the county recognizes that this position may have no effect on Corps' action
because local policies/legislation cannot supersede more restrictive federal legislation.

Ll
H
I
Miscellaneous Resource Protection
Packaae Treatment Plant Use
-- Onslow County wishes to reduce the number of point source pollution discharges and
have sewage treatment systems within the county centralized. However, the county
will not oppose the construction of state -approved package treatment plants in areas
not provided with central sewer service. The county supports more effective
monitoring by the state of the operation of package treatment plants. This policy shall
not prohibit the discharge of waste into wetlands.
-- If any package plants are approved by the state, Onslow County supports the
requirement of a specific contingency plan specifying how ongoing private operation
and maintenance of the plant will be provided, and detailing provisions for assumption
of the plant into a public system should the private operation fail. Operational plans
should also address elimination of package treatment plants when the system owner
elects to connect to a central sewer system.
Marina and Floating Home Development
-- Onslow County considers boating activities an extremely important part of its tourist
industry and overall economy. Subject to the policies stated herein, and applicable
state, federal and local regulations, the county does not oppose the construction of
open water marinas, upland marinas, and dry stack storage facilities.
-- It is county policy to prohibit floating homes. (92)
-- Onslow County will allow floating structures in commercial marinas consistent with
15A NCAC 7H minimum use standards.
Mooring Fields
- Onslow County does not object to the establishment of mooring fields which comply
with applicable state and federal regulations.
Development of Sound and Estuarine Islands
' -- Onslow County opposes any development on sound and estuarine islands located
within its jurisdiction. A local ordinance will be adopted to enforce this policy outside
of AECs.
-- Onslow County does not oppose development of sound and estuarine islands if the
development satisfies the 15A NCAC 7H use standards and applicable ORW
management plans.
Bulkhead Construction
-- Onslow County does not oppose bulkhead construction in any areas of the county as
long as they fulfill the use standards set forth in 15A NCAC 7H. Onslow County also
supports establishment of a state policy which would prohibit bulkheads from
interfering with the natural migration of coastal wetlands and estuarine shorelines
adjacent to primary nursery areas.

-- Onslow County does not oppose bulkhead construction in any areas of the county as '
long as they fulfill the use standards set forth in 15A NCAC 7H.
Sea Level Rise '
-- Onslow County encourages migrating shorelines in coastal wetland areas in order to '
preserve coastal wetlands. The county supports establishment of a state policy which
will protect the natural migration of coastal wetlands. Any state policy addressing
migrating shorelines should provide for the protection of developed areas.
-- Onslow County is aware of the issue of sea level rise due to global warming being
debated within the scientific community. The county will monitor sea level rise and
will respond accordingly by amending applicable regulatory instruments to protect lives '
and property. (92)
Maritime Forests '
-- Based on the Maritime Forest Protection Initiative, May 24, 1990, there are no major
maritime forest sites that are under Onslow County's planning jurisdiction. However, ,
Onslow County supports the recommendations contained in the Maritime Forest
Protection Initiative, May 24, 1990, for the protection of maritime forest areas. (Note:
There are maritime forests located within the county in the barrier island municipalities '
and state-owned lands.)
C. RESOURCE PRODUCTION AND MANAGEMENT POLICIES '
Recreation Resources '
-- Providing estuarine water and beach access for public use is a high priority for county
officials. Therefore, it shall be county policy to make every effort to provide boating '
and pedestrian access to the county's estuarine and beach areas. (92)
-- Subject to available funds, Onslow County supports a comprehensive recreational t
program to provide a broad range of recreational facilities for its citizens.
Productive Agricultural Lands
-- Productive farmland in many cases is also desirable for residential and commercial '
development. There appears to be at this time a supply of productive farmland that
exceeds the demand of the local agriculture economy. Therefore, the county's position '
on this is to let the market place decide the future of agricultural lands, recognizing that
the provision of adequate, suitable land for future residential and commercial purposes
is as important as farmland preservation. The county will continue to monitor the '
supply of farmland in light of agricultural needs and in light of the land demands of an
urbanizing county. Therefore, the county does not adopt a policy extending protection
to productive agricultural lands. (92) '
Aouaculture Activities
-- Aquaculture is considered the cultivation of aquatic plants and animals under controlled '
conditions. The following policies shall apply.
1

F
L
-- Onslow County encourages all aquaculture activities which meet applicable federal,
state and local policies (see Aquaculture policies b) and c) and permit requirements.
However, Onslow County reserves the right to comment on all aquaculture activities
which require Division of Environmental Management permitting.
-- Onslow County objects to any discharge of water from aquaculture activities that will
degrade the receiving waters in any way. Onslow County objects to withdrawing
water from aquifers or surface sources if such withdrawal will endanger water quality
or water supply from the aquifers or surface sources.
-- Onslow County will support only aquaculture activities which do not alter significantly
and negatively the natural environment of coastal wetlands, estuarine waters, public
trust areas, natural heritage areas, and freshwater wetlands as shown on the Land
Classification Map.
Productive Forestlands
-- The county supports all agencies and programs involved with the management of
commercial forest resource and with the implementation of environmental protection
practices associated with forest management and timber production. (92)
Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Development Impacts on Resources
-- Current and future policy will be to allow the market place to establish the need for and
location of future residential and commercial development; all subject to applicable
restrictions, regulations, and the availability of public facilities and service. Current and
future development must meet all established subdivision regulations, health
department regulations, zoning (where applicable), and all state and federal agencies.
The county Planning Board is currently studying expansion of the areas covered under
zoning control which, if expanded, will provide an additional means to guide future
residential, commercial, and industrial development. (92)
Marine Resource Areas
' -- Onslow County does not oppose trawling activities in estuarine waters, but will support
state Marine Fisheries Commission regulations on this issue. (92)
I
Peat or Phosphate Minin
-- Onslow County officials will address these two issues and establish policy if and when
' activity in one or both of these areas appears feasible. However, Onslow County shall
require that an Environmental Impact Study be prepared consistent with the
requirements existing in the General Statutes of the State of North Carolina and
' approved by the Onslow County Board of County Commissioners if such activities are
proposed. (92)
i
Onslow County does not object to peat or phosphate mining which complies with
applicable federal, state, and local regulations.

D. ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I
Water Suoaly
'
-- The county will continue to provide water services to county residents and will
continue the process of studying the role of county government in providing sewage
treatment facilities for rapidly growing areas of the county. The county will secure
'
federal or state grants, when feasible, to help carry out this policy. (92)
Eneray Facility Siting and Develoament
'
-- If offshore oil or gas is discovered within the North Carolina Outer Continental Shelf
(OCS) area, Onslow County will not oppose drilling operations and attendant onshore
'
support facilities within the county, provided an environmental impact statement has
been prepared and a finding of no significant impact on the environment has been
made. As a further condition to this position the county will require full disclosure of
,
development plans, with mitigative measures that will be implemented to prevent
adverse impacts upon environment, public facilities and services, and socioeconomic
systems prevalent in the county. The county is cognizant of the negative aspects of
,
the successful drilling operations scenario. Drilling operations and onshore support
facilities may bring heavy costs to the county (and municipalities) as well as
advantages. Impact assistance should be rendered to the county and communities by
'
the drilling companies from revenues generated by local operations. (92)
-- Onslow County does not oppose offshore drilling for oil or gas. t
Land Use Regulation/Urban Growth Patterns
-- Restrict encroachment into areas of marginal septic tank suitability. (92) '
-- Expansion of the zoned area(s) to include the US 17 and NC 24 highway corridors. ,
Estuarine Access
-- County officials will continue to work to expand and improve beach and waterfront '
access for public use. (92)
Assistance in Channel Maintenance '
-- Proper maintenance of channels is very important in Onslow County because of the
substantial economic impact of commercial fisheries, boating, sport fishing, and '
successful operation of the State Port. If silt or other deposits fill in the channels, this
could impede efficient docking of the commercial fishing and transport vessels.
Onslow County will provide assistance to the US Corps of Engineers and state officials t
by either helping to obtain or providing spoil sites, especially to maintain all inlets.

APPENDIX III
7
ONSLOW COUNTY
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
PREPARATION OF LAND USE PLAN
FISCAL YEAR 1996-97
Onslow County has received a FY96-97 Coastal Area Management Act grant for the update of
its existing Land Use Plan. Adequate citizen participation in the development of the Plan is
essential to the preparation of a document responsive to the needs of the citizens of Onslow
County. To ensure such input, the following citizen participation program will be utilized by the
county.
The Planning Board will work with the county's planning consultant to ensure that the final
product will survey existing land use, identify policies, recommend strategies/actions, and identify
Areas of Environmental Concern. The plan will focus on issues expected to occur during the
planning period, including infrastructure needs, housing needs, transportation planning, and
environmental concerns. A completely new land classification map will be provided. Specifically,
the planning consultant and the Planning Board will be responsible for ensuring accomplishment
of the following:
— Development of new policies/strategies required to respond to revised 15A NCAC 7B
planning requirements.
— Assessment of the impact of 404 wetlands on Onslow County.
— County -wide economic development.
— Assess impact of expansion of military air space.
— Preservation of water quality in the New and White Oak Rivers.
-- Regulation of density adjacent to ORW's and primary fisheries areas.
— Assessment of the need for county -wide thoroughfare planning.
-- Protection of AFC's.
— Assess impact of U.S. 17 corridor relocation.
— An updated land use plan based on an effective citizen participation process.
The following schedule will be utilized:
1. January, 1997 -- Conduct initial meeting with the Board of Commissioners.
2. January -February, 1997 -- complete identification of existing land use problems, develop
socioeconomic base data, and survey and map existing AECs.
3. February, 1997 — The Board of Commissioners will conduct a public information meeting
and adopt a Citizen Participation Plan. The meeting will be advertised in a local
newspaper. The county will specifically discuss the policy statements contained in the
Onslow County Land Use Plan. The significance of the policy statements to the CAMA
land use planning process shall be described. The process by which Onslow County will
solicit the views of a wide cross-section of citizens in the development of the updated
policy statements will be explained.
' 4. March - May, 1997 — Continue preparation of a draft Land Use Plan and conduct
meetings with the Onslow County Planning Board.
7

5. June,1997 — Present complete draft sections of the plan and preliminary policy statements I
to the Onslow County Planning Board.
6. July, 1997 — Review draft Land Use Plan with the Board of Commissioners. '
7. July, 1998 — Submit draft of completed Land Use Plan to the Division of Coastal
Management staff for review and comment. '
7. Following receipt of DCM comments (estimate October or November, 1998) -- Conduct
three formal public hearings at different locations in the county. Present the proposed Land '
Use Plan to the Board of Commissioners for adoption.
All meetings of the Onslow County Planning Board and Board of Commissioners at which the ,
update of the Land Use Plan will be discussed will be advertised in a local newspaper in a non -legal
ad section. In addition, public service announcements will be mailed to local radio stations and
posted in the County Manager's Office and County Courthouses. All meetings will be open to the '
public. The county will encourage and consider all economic, social, ethnic, and cultural
viewpoints. No major non-English speaking groups are known to exist in Onslow County.
Anyone wishing to obtain information on the update of the Onslow County Land Use Plan should '
contact the County Planning Director at [phone].
Revised 7/22/98
r
11