Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutProposed Park Development for the New Hanover County Parks and Recreation Department-1979DCM COPY DCM COPY lease do not remove!!!!! Division of Coastal Management DERICK G. S. DAVIS & ASSOCIATES P. O. BOX 1425 • WILMINGTON. NORTH CAROLINA 28401 • (919) 763-1910 PROPOSED PARK DEVELOPMENT ' FOR THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY ' PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT The preparation of this report was financed in part through a grant provided by the North Carolina Coastal.Management, ' Program, through funds provided by the Coastal Zone Manage- ment Act of 1972, as amended, which is administered by the office of Coastal Zone Management National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. ,. - 1979 AUGUST 1 ' TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I AUTHORIZATION CHAPTER II INTRODUCTION CHAPTER III SITE DESCRIPTIONS, EVALUATIONS & PHYSICAL PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT Park Location Map Arrowhead Park ' Castle Hayne Park Snow's Cut Park ' Masonboro Island Park CHAPTER IV COST ESTIMATES AND/OR RECOMMENDED PHASING ' Arrowhead Park Castle Hayne Park Snow's Cut Park Masonboro Island Park Cost Estimate Summary CHAPTER V MAINTENANCE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES CHAPTER VI LABOR FORCE REQUIREMENTS ' CHAPTER VII EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS ■ CHAPTER VIII COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES PAGE N0. 1 2 3 - 26 3 10 16 22 27 - 34 27 29 31 33 34 35 60 61 62 I. AUTHORIZATION This document was prepared by Derick G.S. Davis and Associates under contract to the New Hanover County Parks and Recreation Department, Wilmington, North Carolina. The scope of work consist of developing site plans for five (5) sites to be accompanied by a narrative report developed for each site: Arrowhead Park Castle Hayne Snow's Cut Park Masonboro Island Park New Waterfront Park (44 acres) (4.7 acres) (20 acres) (15. acres) (Three (3) sites to be evaluated 10 - 15 acres each) Page 1 II. INTRODUCTION It is the intent of this report to provide persons directing ' the development and management of these sites with a com- prehensive plan of development, to be used as a foundation for future plans and specifications. 1 The planning process involved the use of an interdisciplinary team approach to analyze site design information for recom- mendations on development, cost estimates, phasing, maintenance and operation procedures and staffing. These plans were formulated with multiple considerations; to develop a park that would more adequately meet the needs of the surrounding area, function harmoniously with the physical features of the site; be economically feasible, and to provide a recreation base for future development. With the implementation of these plans the people of the area will receive BASIC recreational features and experiences of a meaningful nature. Present and future strains put on existing facilities as a result of an influx of population and mounting demands for ' localized recreation being created by fuel shortages, has put the department in the position of trying to bridge the ' gap between SUPPLY and DEMAND. Significant results to compensate for those conditions, can be obtained through: ' Proper planning, improved land use, careful implementation ' and quality management. Page 2 r m= m= m= m m m= m m m m= m m m m m A m m m m m m m r I I 1 111110 AL }421 4 rl Q a. ARROWHEAD PARK ,` r o o� WI � k,h c; S N 0 W'S CUT PARK 1 \ .,,LINA REACH INLET i . I aC A' AL iaCAROLINA BEACH ` v I�I �ngtoil as `N I -,a / KURE BEACH i F•,r 1 O FN D � ArW INLLT J ?LISUANpHrI LVLrT MASONBORO ISLAND PARK PARK LOCATION MAP NEW HANOVER COUNTY DERICK G. S. DAVIS & ASSOCIATES BASE MAP BY WILMINGTON -NEW HANOV'_R PLANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE IN MILES I � r r� rr r� rr r� rr �■r r� �r rr rr it Ir rr r rr r■� III. SITE DESCRIPTION AND EVALUATION A. ARROWHEAD PARK Size: The site is approximately 27 acres excluding the adjacent Mary C. Williams Elementary. School property of 17 acres. Location: The park is located in the south central area of the county, near Silver Lake and adjacent to the Mary C. Williams Elementary School. See park location map. Access: The park is accessed by U.S. Hwy 421 via Silver Lake Road and several subdivision roads to Arnold Road. Soils: The site is comprised of four (4) soil types which are: 1. Johnston (JO) 2. Kureb - sand (Kr) 3. Rimini - sand (Rm) 4. Lakeland - sand (La) * Each of these soils types are limiting in regard to recreational development and require special planning consideration. Source: New Hanover County Soils Survey. * Soil Conservation Service Evaluation July 4, 1979 Pages 62 - 64. Page 4 Vegetation: The vegetation varies on the site from swamp forest along Mott Creek to Longleaf Pine, Turkey Oak, wiregrass community on the sandhills, and a Pine Savanna community on the flatter western portion of the site. Bottom land hardwoods occur along higher ground near Mott Creek. Topography: The site varies in elevation from near MSL along Mott Creek to 42.6' above MSL at the top of a large sandhill, near the upper end of the site. The 100 year flood elevation for this site is 12' MSL. The site is generally comprised of a sandhill ridge running north to south and a fairly 1 level area on the wester third of the property. The area directly adjacent to Mott Creek is swampy which varies in width from approximately 100' to 2001. Unique Features: The site contains several unique areas including the variety of plant communities mentioned above and the relatively high sandhill located in the central area of the site. The site has approximately 1,600 LF of frontage along Mott Creek. 1 Existing Right -of -Ways: A high voltage power line forms the ' southwestern boundary of the project. Also, a 30' drainage easement runs along the western portion on the project with ' a drainage ditch cutting across the site. Page 5 Availability of Utilities: Telephone, electrical, and water utilities are located adjacent to the site. ' Public sewage is not available. Surrounding Land Use: To the north, northwest, and northeast are residential areas. To the south, ' southwest is undeveloped land and to the southeast ' boundary is Mott Creek. The Mary C. Williams Elementary School is located adjacent to northern ' boundary. ' Surface Water: A small pond is located in the northwestern portion of the site behnind the school. ' Existing Facilities: The site is virtually undeveloped with the adjoining school property having a ' multi- purpose court and a play area with equipment. P P l Special Problems: The surrounding residential area has not provided open play areas for children. Low areas around Mott Creek are showing signs of impact from improper use. In addition, sandhills are presently being used by off -road vehicles. Citizen In -Put: The public meeting for citizen in -put was poorly attended. However, persons present expressed a strong preference for tennis courts and family recreational activities. I Page 6 CONCLUSION OF ANALYSIS. ' Positive: 1. Variety of ecological communities 2. Good location in relation to need for outdoor recreation ' 3. Adequate size 4. Relationship with school good - has potential for 1 environmental education purposes 5. Canoe access to Mott Creek with canoe trail potential Negative: 1. Soils on the uplands are generally execessively drained sandy soils with severe limitations for recreational development. Soils along Mott Creek are poorly drained ' with severe limitations for recreation also. 2. Vegetation on the sandhills and in the swamp areas are of ' a frag it nature and not conducive to intensive recreational use. 3. Access being only obtained through residential areas ' should be noted for its potential traffic safety problem. ' f development objective Site Design Intent: The proposed plan o is p to link the site with the Mary C. Williams Elementary School grounds to form a community type park with facilities for school and public use. The site is designed for both passive and active recreation with outdoor educational facilities. Page 7 ' Facilities at Mary C. Williams Elementary School would include: 1. A little league baseball field 2. Additional playground equipment ' 3. Additional landscaping 4. School being linked to nature trails for Environmental Education Facilities at the proposed Arrowhead Park would include: 1. One (1) regulation size softball field 2. Two (2) double tennis courts 3. Restrooms - concession - rental equipment building 4. Two (2) small playground areas ' S. An observation tower on top of large hill ' 6. A series of interpretive trails 7. A system of walking trails linking the various activity areas of the park and the Mary C. William Elementary School 8. A large parking area with access off Arnold Road for tennis and softball complex 9. A canoe put -in on Mott Creek ' 10. A small parking area with access off Sandou Road for the canoe put -in ' 11. Picnic area with shelter ' Page 8 DERICK G.S. DAVI! & ASSOCIATE! tA J. us AL0AL Va 1 NATU;2F T2 ,. L f3R'_-,W_ NQLQ � w IL Rp�. .. z AR 0 ' = ' o � V _ A Q p • a (� z Z m 0 ' W z CDW—E-'9IOFJ M3U QEhT �41, "-SEEN PLM1TlNCsI - cPy°� a Em C Rpm, O c W _ 0L It E / \ � ToT L-cr [ GnTE f� s i � q�ti�� i MARY C. WILLIAMS �\ Q \ELE NTARY t ul z / QCTh. SCHOOL �j - Z44 D f \ l� r l/ • • _ \ 000 U • • - FUTuec 1 • i •: FIELD PIPE p,TCN - •„ ,, - •.I _ ILEX •• c ( ••...•• • 'tee - CAPE MAIZ RIPER ' / I : _ • • • • • ' - - SLIELTELt • •.•. • .. . i -.___ &P--m MOuNp To 5clz m ` ... • � 3c12[IEQ E- PaQ.KING MOTT SARDOU RD. GIhNT CYPQES17 —_ --- -- ----- INTERP2ETIVE TRAIL (I30A¢DVJAL44� Gi1FJOE T>ZhIL �� o [ao :oo 300 400 �Pazkl NU SCALE IN I[[T (l a) 5 B. CASTLE HAYNE PARK. Size: The site is approximately 4.7 acres including the Boy Scout property which forms the northern portion of the park.. Location: The park is situated on the Northeast Cape Fear River within the community of Castle Hayne. See park location map. Access: Accessed by S.R. 1340 via N. C. Hwys 132, 133, and U.S. Hwy 117. Soils: The site is comprised of two (2) soil types which are: 1. Lakeland (La) involving approximately 90% of the site. Depth to water table 6.00 2. Kenansville (Ke) comprises the remainder of the site. Depth to water table 6.00 *Each of these soils types are limiting in regard to recreational development and require special plan- ning consideration. Source: New Hanover County Soils Survey *Soils Conservation Service Evaulation July 4, 1979- Page s 62 - 64. Vegetation: The site is generally comprised of mixed Pine and hardwood species with some swamp forest specimens along the water margin. Page 10 Topography: The site varies in elevation from MSL to 12' above ' MSL. The 100 year flood elevation for this site is at 8' MSL. Most of the site is flat to gently rolling. A steep bank exists along the central portion of the site and diminishing in both directions. ' Unique Features: The site is approximately 2,600 LF of shoreline. An abandoned bridge abuttment is located at the northern extremity of the site. Existing Right -of -Ways: The State Highway holds a 30' R/W for S. ' R. 1340 the entire length of the site. Availability of Utilities: Telephone and electric utilities are located adjacent to the site. Public sewage or water systems are not available ' Surrounding Land Use: To the north is low lying undeveloped river frontage. To the northwest is more developed area of a higher elevation. To the south and southwest is residential while the entire east boundary is water oriented. ' Existing Facilities: Existing facilities include a concrete masonry block community building, concrete picnic pads, a 1 boat lauching ramp and boat dock, with adjacent informal swimming beach and a private observation dock. Generally, the facilities are in poor condition. Page 11 a Special Problems: Existing land use and encroachment by neighboring property owners are two specific areas of concern at this site. The existing land use problem is particularly sensitive, since the people of the area hand built several facilities on the site. While deserving to be commended for their efforts, it should be pointed out that a safety problem has been created at the boat launch - swimming area. This is due to the closeness of these conflicting facilities. ' Encroachment by neighboring landowners is another concern with this site. In one case, a private dock has been built on public lands. It is ' recommended that this matter be investigated and appropriate action be taken. An additional problem is posed by the uncontrolled vehicle traffic through the tree cover. Citizen In -Put: At the public meeting, P g� citizens generally 5 Y ' opposed any changes in existing usage of the site. It was brought out that late night vandalism the is being by occurs and access road used speeding cars during the middle of the day. Also, several persons expressed d f r p sed p s the nee or more boat docking ' space in the ramp area. Page 12 ' Positive: 1. Good land - water relationship with river access ' 2. Mostly lands non-floodable ' 3. Good road access 4. Good community park potential 5. No through traffic 6. Good tree cover 7. Existing community multipurpose building Negative: ' 1. Soils not conducive to intensive recreational use 2. Conflicting facilities (boat -swimming area) 3. Space limitations by total acres and linear configuration of site. 4. Local opposition to change of current use ' 5. Poor control 6. Access to river at opposite end of site from entrance 7. Exterior of community building detracting from overall site appearance. 8. Vehicular paths throughout park i i i Page 13 Site Design Intent: It is proposed that the site be developed as a community park serving the local area, with the area being used for passive activities. Proposed improvements to the ' area include: Community Building Area. i1. Remodel interior and exterior 2. Add boat dock and observation deck ' 3. Put in additional picnic sites 4. Demarcate parking areas and install barrier posts 5. Additional landscaping i ' Boat Launch Area. 1. Improve ramp and dock ' 2. Demarcate parking areas and road system 3. Install sitting area with benches along river bank Swimming Area. 1. No improvement in this area. The present situation is not safe and increased usage should be discouraged. 2. The use of signs stating "Hazardous or Dangerous Swimming ' Area" is recommended to minimize the county's liability. iSite Wide. ' 1. Install gravel walking paths with native landscape planting. 2. Install barrier posts to keep vehicles out. Page g 14 i I POST "NO WAKE" ZONE 1000' h_ GAZEBO (ELEVATED OVER BANK) L BOTH WAYS FROM RAMP ' E Northeast Cope O� ' - PARKING (20 CARS EXIST BOAT EXIST. BOAT GRAVEL PATH W/ORNAMENTAL AND TRAILERS) RAMP DOCK W/ADDITION PLANTINGS GROUP PICNIC AREA COMMUNITY BUILDING W/BAR-B-O (TO BE REMODE 1 NEW BOAT DOCK —_-- — ••�'•• PICNIC SITE i BEACH — _ - J'-C_�• .-..;� .......................iF Ali— EXISTtSITTING AREAS W/BENCHES , �: r` ; _ .. f • ; ip a ,t DOCK to % PLAYGROUND 10 1 SPEED SUMPS _ I/ > EVERY 500' t-� AREA LIGHT SHELTER BARRIER POSTS OVERFLOW PARKiNGJ r EXIST. HOMES (TYPICAL) - �`-PARKING (20 CARS) o !00 200 Jun JJO „>,r P� /_DERICK G.S DAVIS /& ASSGCIATES Y F- Z W i I- m � � d L, •Z o {Y • V Z Z Z� Fl Q W > Z a 0 I-.Z W OC W 0 f, Z d a a 3 0 3 jUj W Z Z a IA Y d - D. D. 2 5 C. SNOWS CUT RECREATION.AREA. ' Size: The site is approximatley 207 acres. ' Location: The park is located in the south end of the ' county on the Snows Cut Channel of the Intercoastal Waterway. See park location map. Access: The park is access by S.R. 1576 and 1100 via ' U. S. Hwy. 421. ' soils Soils: The site is comprised of four (4) so types ' as follows: 1. Wakulla (Wa) involving approximately 85% of ' the site. Depth to water table 6.00 2. Borrow Pit (BP) involving approximately 5% of ' the site. 3. Tidal Marsh (TM) involving approximately 5% ' of the site. 4. Leon (Le) involving the remainder of the site. ' *Each of these soils types are limiting in regard to recreational development and require special plan- ning consideration. Source: New Hanover County Soils Survey *Soils Conservation Service Evaluation July 4, 1979 - ' Pages 62 - 64. Vegetation: The site is generally_ comprised of mixed ' Pine and hardwood. Page =16 Topography: The site varies in elevation from near MSL to 21' above MSL. The 100 year flood elevation for this site is 13' MSL. The area being mostly flat giving way to two (2) march areas in the western portion of the site. The waterway banks forming an approximate 1:1 slope. Unique Features: The site has two (2) tidal marsh areas with adjacent non-floodable lands. The area also posesses an excellent water - land relationship. Existing Right -of -Ways: The U. S. Army Corps of Engineers owns in fee a 500'`strip either side of the center line of the waterway, within which the site is located. Existing power line right-of-way runs along both S.R. 1576 a S.R. 1100. Drainage Ways: The site has two (2) natural drainage areas, both located in the western portion of the site with effluent flow into the waterway. Availability of Utilities: Telephone and electrical utilities are available in the area. Public water and sewer are not accessible to the site. Page 17 Surrounding Land Use: To the north of the site is residential and small commercial business such as a camp ground area and a fishing supply store. To the east and west are dredge disposal areas. The southern boundary being approximately 3,400 L.F. of the Intercoastal Waterway. Existing Facilities: Existing facilities include a picnic area with restroom accommodations, fishing area, boat beach and some trails. Special Problems: The severity of slope on the water- way banks has potential for erosion and safety problems. Citizen In -Put: At the public meeting citizens generally had little opposition to the proposed site plan but expressed a strong desire to see soft ball fields located across U. S. Hwy 421, in the vicinity of the community of Seabreeze. Page 18 CONCLUSION OF ANALYSIS Positive: 1. Access off U. S. Hwy 421 2. Established picnic area, boat beach, and fishing area 3. Topography conducive to development 5. Tidal marsh areas with adjacent floodable lands Negative: 1. Western portion of site restricted from operations and maintenance access 2. Soils not conducive to intensive use 3. Power line right-of-way visually detracting 4. The geographical location of the site and the shape may present control problems 5. Government ownership, requiring lease, may pose development limitations Site Design Intent: The site is designed primarily for passive recreation with outdoor education facilities. Proposed improvements to areas include: Existing Picnic Area: 1. Remodeling interior and exterior of restrooms 2. Existing picnic table and grounds to be upgraded 3. Additional 40-car parking spaces 4. Additional space allocated for picnicing as needed Page 19 Fishing Facilities: 1. Provide fishing platform 2. Demarcate parking spaces in area Game Court Area: 1. Add parking facilities 2. Install two (2) 30' x 60' game courts 3. 10' storm fencing 4. Landscape screening native to the area Natural Area: 1. Picnic shelter and facilities 2. Nature trails 3. Boardwalks along marsh areas 4. Two (2) parking facility locations 5. one (1) restroom buildings 6. An overlook area viewing waterway 7. Two (2) overlook areas viewing marsh 8. Retaining an existing boat beach area Page 20 DERICK G.S. DAVIS V& ASSOCIATES I i7 4 FI�•NIN'• - -DWALK I � Z W 99 ��:�►� ,i�`� 1, 1�-•I��l,. . � p V c Z J ' WILMIM&TOW W 11- _ OICNIC eeee- > 4 O T/f1U uuoERA,To FLY Sp MARSHi reEes O m t~9 �o n3 = oC X o 01 ; c Vill �il'-R Gd +GI-!T WITH ZEST ROOMO (` •••�' �•_ Y PAR2L LIMITS *�•� -- ---_ " - .� � / -�i Jl - •• •-��%• ---� "-_- --� %I, PROPOSKD N4TUf[� TKAIL(TYPIG6L '---_ ----` \ � ;/� �/ -_ _- ::�+�:• _----ro-. ----- _ _ \ �.� ♦ •�... •4•j:-�.i� Jy�•' j� .AmuCc _ Lis PeJunuG DSa- • �' _,��-• '� _•. 'r Ci ?PeCES�y..ti ~• O 1 f-�-= ��"_ - SG,ZEEM PLdaJT11.Ys ', % � ' • , � :, PARVJ AEG \ r - .•�,',�'. . •' • :• ` .Ly; J; __ _ ) PICNIC 9 rE- TO INC.LJDF_ +�' �/• - - :+� S7nCE4 .I I - pLdTF02M-2EPG12 2OAD I•, PICNIC .•(5 Mo2.WICW`PE .� I ' 1TppLGG211,L. 7QA,y1{:CAN�TYi� , r; 1 a PFZOPCSED �O _O•-•• �''!� S4}BLi'E>Z-15 TABLE. T=1SNll.y6 PAe¢DWALK-� I! ICI ,VIEWINCf, 1• - _ :), la.' - '° �� 0On19TRUGTED CN { ,V..il✓!' - --.-:• BENGFI (TYPIGdI� EXIZTING 21P RaP - Q • I �lsl .r W.F 0'! KI6TI►1G 8' T2a1L TO ERHIAY i Y ; • t� L .�---(J✓ SAE UP62ADED• TO 8E USED AT N- � ".� ; �,• � ,�°�` �• ,.�. � Intl./ , �'� Db DUAL Pu¢GC�SE;waLlcwaY W &140 0 M (TY? I CA L) S T L ti 3 1_ LI ti. ortovo,Ev TZEliT eoo»te I N T E R LW • t. yv E ;' -� , `- !„� l - - GA810145 GE EIP RAP - 0 100 200 300 400 1JOTE: GOo¢D. wITA U.S. Gov P�IpR TO WTTINCa TYEE9 FOR SCALE IN FEET \ SAT 9EAGa3 �h' i GAZ4FS0/oVE21G�OK- 'GC>,1ST2UGTIO►J. EX.I�ij'ING TR.EE4 REMOVE Fx�9T. ST,M(Xa) 9002.OwGL,C / 'A ITN- NGNES a8E PROPF CF U.S. GOV. � CH�ANE[TfA� PPED� ` .(oGGES°J16LF 'O L{ANDIUaQPE9� PLOT FORM - D. MASONBORO ISLAND NATURE AREA. Size: The site is approximately 15 acres. ' Location The site is located on a barrier island between Masonboro Inlet and Carolina Beach Inlet with the county site being on the norther portion of the island. ' See park location map. ' Access: The area is restricted to boat access only. Soils: The site is comprised of two (2) soil types which are: ' 1. Newhen (NH) involving approximately 800 of the site. Depth to water table 6.00. 2. Tidal Marsh (TM) comprising the remainder of the site. *Each of these soils types are limiting in regard to ' recreational development and require special planning consiseration. Source: New Hanover Soils Survey *Soils Conservation Service evaluation July 4, 1979 ' pages 62 - 64. Vegetation: The site is composed of salt spray community grasses with no existing g trees. ' Page 22 Topography: The site varies in elevation from MSL to 11.6' above MSL. The 100 year flood elevation for this site is 13' MSL high velocity. Most of the site is gently rolling with an occasional steep bank of dunes cropping up along the eastern portion of the site and running north and south. The geomorphology of the island is of a shifting nature. Unique Features: The site is unique in that it is an undeveloped barrier island with randomly located shore bird nesting area being one of the interesting features. Existing Right -of -Way: The Goverment owns a 100' strip eitherway the center line of the jetty foot in addition to retaining a 20' easement on the maintenance road from the sound side of the island to the ocean side. Availability of Utilities: No utilities are available on the site. ' Surrounding Land Use: To the north of the site is land owned by the Government for a dredge disposal area. To the south is privately owned undeveloped property. To the east is the Atlantic Ocean and to the west is Banks ' Channel. Page 23 Existing Facilities: The site is an undeveloped area. Special Problem: The fact that the site is a barrier island with nesting areas and salt spray communities makes it extremely fragil to development. The construction of the new jetty on the island will increase pedestrian traffic. Citizen In -Put: The attendance at the public meeting was not good but those that were there expressed a very strong desire not to disturb the island. It was also felt that visitation should NOT be encouraged. Page 24 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CONCLUSION OF ANALYSIS Positive: 1. Accessibility only by boat 2. Environmentally interesting flora and fauna Negative: 1. Soils not conducive to recreational use 2. Vegetation and overall uniqueness of the area too fragil for recreational impact 3. No economical solution to providing sanitation facilities Site Design Intent: Masonboro Island is recommended for extremely limited passive use. Barrier islands being very unsuitable and non -conducive to development. Thus, drinking water and sanitary facilities are not endorsed. Trash containers will be furnished and maintained by county forces. An overlook area is proposed to furnish visitors a prime observation point, in order to relieve pressures being put upon nearby dunes presently used for this purpose. It is recommended this structure be of non -wood to resist vandalism and the environmental elements. Principally, the intent is not to encourage visitation to the island. Page 25 EXIST. WOOD- STRUCTURES- ._ (GROINS) „�.. 8p.'_ 1 BIRD NESTING AREA TO REMAIN NATURALJ, -1~� - 1 TYPICAL SIGN : NATURAL HABITAT AREA - •••` •''� PLEASE KEEP OUT ----MEAN LOW TIDE ♦ - as \ � yMEAN HIGH TIDE i _ i SIGN I�, t J \ 1 ------------- � t -- ---s-------- ----- "�� EXIST. GRAVEL ROAD I 516N" BOARDWALK , " (TYPICAL) N 0. x - \ \ -0 \ / b -- -_---- - y U.S. GOVT. OWNED LAND V w ®SIGN — "p 2 111 \ - ------------------ w 1 ao +ve YOUPON PLANTING cOL a--- // O 59 Ix U • (TYPICAIN / .09 COVERED OVERLOOK W/SEATING i01 jl ---"" (ELEV. +14) 1 / /� O b e. a SIGN /i/ (7 too-b " - - SIGN Z a ,,, ♦ SIGN: NO SWIMMING -DANGEROUS �•• ••• - ••' DROPOFFS a CURRENTS _ -- MASONBORO INLET SOUTH JETTY ESA2zIEfC I'-LA1dVy WE VECCY 10N-,T&1,3LE W9 qOK-CONVUCA'.(E TO PEVEL.D?MEtAT; TIAUS WE 6 IZECONTMENV VERY LIMITEV VEVEL0F'mSkT A.T ` O^ c A N M450UI ow 12LANV. IT 1°.) ALSO eEC.OMMF_NfJEO y A T L A N i i C G THA.T NO OR'VKwG VdAT1=2 R � G/JITAeY CA6ILITIFZ f B t�bY�QYV. TRASW CCWTA,It-IERZ 51a0UL12 SE 920VIOEV AND A _ WEEKLY VICK-JP SCHEDULE, PRE7ERA15LY � C415, o Too xoo noo aoo SHOULD W RENDERED BY GOUNTY ?F-T5O P.L OR. - B`( P21 VAT E GONTL=pGT. - SCALE IN FEET - DERICK G.S. DAVIS & ASSOCIATES 1- Z !W i F d H ^ 1� Z W • 0 0 V O • o V Z z C d NJ W ~ Z o > W Q O Z W 2 !Z j 0303 W Z Q Z to bd OC IV. COST ESTIMATES AND RECOMMENDED PHASING: PHASING IN PARKS IS SUBJECT TO THE AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS. ARROWHEAD PARK I PHASE . 20' access road (600 LF. - 1300 s.y) _ $ 18,000 (including sand -clay base, asphalt ' wearing course, culvert, etc.) . 20 car parking lot (720 s.y.) 8,000 30,000 Shelter with rest rooms . Entrance gate and sign 750 Site Work (paths, trash cans, cleaning, ' water fountain, utility work, seeding, etc) lump sum 4,000 . 10 picnic units (including table, grill, Itrash items can and installation of - ' $400 per unit) 4,000 Sub -Total 64,750 10% contingency 6,475 PHASE I TOTAL ESTIMATE $71,225 PHASE II . Tot lot (landscape structures items #19-A, or equal - material cost 3,000 times 2.5 for installation) $ 7,500 . Upgrading of existing lay equipment Pg g P and little league ball field 15,000 . Nature trail 1,500 LF + (3'-4' wide) 2.00 LF 3,000 . Boardwalk/overlook area (10.00 LF @ 700 LF) 7,000 I Sub -Total 32,500 10% Contingency g Y 3,250 PHASE II TOTAL ESTIMATE $35,750 ' Page 27 ' PHASE III . 40 car parking P g lot ( 1 440 s.Y) 16,000 . 2 tennis courts ($15,000/each) -30,000 . Softball field (complete including lights) 65,000 35,000 . Concession/Rest Room Building Observation Tower 15,000 . Fence along ditch (1,500 + @ 6.00 ft 9,000 . Hard surface walks (400 s.y. @ 3.00/s.y.) 1,200 . Screen planting 3,000 ' . fountains 3,500 Water (2) and pipe j . Inter. signs (routed - 20+ signs)- $50.00/each 1,000 .Sub -Total 178,700 1 10% contingency 17,870 Phase. III Total Estimate $196,570 FUTURE: . 2 tennis courts (15,000 each) 30,000 Sub -Total. 30,000 10% contingency 3,000 FUTURE TOTAL ESTIMATE 33,000 PROJECT TOTAL ESTIMATE $336,500 NOTE: Contingency is intended to reflect.hidden increases not reflected in the annual inflation rate and price index. Page 2.8 CASTLE HAYNE t 1 1 1 1 1 20 car parking area 450 s.y. @ 9.00/s.y. (base material, grading, asphalt total job) Community building — remodeling total job (exterior improvements, new rest rooms) . Tot lot (landscape structures Item #19A, or equal material cost 3,000 X 2.5 for installation) . 7.picnic units (including table, grill, trash can and installation of items - concrete pads existing - 400 per unit) . Group Picnic Area - 7 tables, 2 trash cans, barbeque, site work (no concrete pads for tables) Total area cost . Picnic Shelter (8-table) . Boat dock and expand existing boat dock . Gazabo . 20 car/boat trailer parking area 1,500 s.y. @ 9.00/s.y. *. Area lights at 6.00/month which includes all maintenance . Gravel Path (4' wide with wood edger-3100 L.F - material and labor 3.00 L.F. • Barrier posts - 51o.c. (use old utility poles donated by CP&L - cut in 5' lenghts and bury 3' in ground) 2,400 L.F. equals 480 posts @ 1.50 each for installation • Speed bumps (4) @ 25.00/each $ 4,050 10,000 7,500 2,800 1,750 15,000 5,000 7,500 13,950 * 216/ year 9,300 Page 29 620 100 Castle Hayne - Continued - . Landscape Planting - lump sum estimated Sub -Total ' 10% contingency TOTAL * NOT IN ESTIMATE - Recommended to lease from local power company for maintenance and operations - simplicity and economics. 2,500 80,070 8,000 $88,070 ' SNOW'S CUT . 20' access road (including sand/clay base asphalt 1 base, wearing course, etc) 11.00/s.y. - 1,300 s.y. $ 14,630 . 18' access road (including sand/clay base, asphalt base, wearing course, etc) 11.00/s.y. - 1,600 s.y. 17,600 . 20' gravel access road - 4.00/s.y. - 6" deep (including material & labor) - •1,660 s.y. 6,640 . Parking (gravel) - 4.00/s.y. - 6" deep (including material and labor) - 650 s.y. 2,600 . Games courts (2) fenced with -equipment and jscreen planting - lump sum 6,000 . Upgrading existing rest rooms - lump sum 7,500 . Upgrading existing picnic area (including new tables, grills, trash cans, site work, - (lump sum estimate) 3,500 . 20 picnic units (West of U.S. 421) including table, trash cans, clearing underbrush, installation of items - 450 per/unit 9,000 ' . 9 picnic units (East of U.S. 421) same items as per 20 units 4,050 . New rest rooms 20,000 . 8 table picnic shelter (no toilets) 15,000 . Gazabo/overlook with benches 7,500 ' . Gabions/Rip Rap - lump sum .2,000 . Hard -surface walks - 11.00/s.y. - 200 s.ys. 2,200 4' nature trails - 2.00/L.F. - 5,100 L.F. 10,200 ' Page 31 Snows Cut - Continued: . Existing 8' trail to be upgraded (3.50/L.F.) - 2,400 L.F. 8,400 . Boardwalk with viewing platforms 10.00/L.F. - 900 L.F. 9,000 . Boat Beach — remove existing stumps, L.S. 400 . Fishing Boardwalk - 15.00/L.F. - 450 L.F. 6,750 * . Area lights at 6.00/month each which includes all maintenance (6-each) * 432/ year . Benches (5 each) 350.00/each 1,750 Sub -Total 183,320 10% Contingency 18,330 TOTAL $201,650 * NOT IN ESTIMATE - Recommended to lease from local power company for maintenance and operation - simplicity and economics. Page 32 MASONBORO ISLAND . Overlook/Shelter structure (non -wood structure to prevent vandalisum) Lump sum • Boardwalk (5' wide built on grade - crushed gravel surface with edger) 300/L.F. @ 5.00/ft. • Sign (5 each) 50.00/sign including installation • Trash can with security chains and posts 6 units @ 75.00/each including installation • Planting - Youpon Trees - 50+ trees at 30.00 each includes installation Sub -Total 10% Contingency TOTAL NOTE: Rocks for Overlook/Shelter to be placed by jetty construction. New Hanover County to coordinate with jetty contractor and Corps of Engineers 40,000 1,500 250 450 1,500 43,700 4,370 $48,070 Page 33 Li I 1 I 1�, 0 L� p F 1 1 ! COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY. ! ARROWHEAD PARK $366,500. CASTLE HAYNE PARK 88,070. SNOW'S CUT PARK 201,650. MASONBORO ISLAND PARK 48,070. TOTAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT $704,290. t ! 1 1 1 Page 34 V. MAINTENANCE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES It is imperative that all public areas and facilities for parks and recreation services be well maintained and kept attractive. This necessitates the staffing and maintaining of a maintenance crew and the purchase of specialized equipment to properly maintain all areas. The following maintenance cost quidelines reflect labor and material cost.of New Hanover County as of July 1978 and are recommended for the specified areas. Page 35 r rr r �r rr rr r r rs rr r r rr rr r rr rr rr r� DIRT PATH WITH BOARDWALK Page 1 of 2 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING ACTIONS FREQUENCY STANDARD PERSONNEL ANNUAL COSTS OPERATING CAPITAL 1. Rake s Fill Once per year 16 hours per Motor Equipment Tractor with year Operator Rake h$ ours X 3.61 per $ hours x 10.06 hour.= $28.88 per hour = $80.48 Laborer -hours x 2.90 per hour = $11.60 2. Repair Once per year 4 hours per Laborer I Lumber Boardwalk year h� x 2.90 per " x " x 1" hour =. $11 .60 2" x 4" x Ill. 6" x I" x I" $12.00 (Approximately) Paint 1 gallon X 5.75 per gallon = $5.75 Stain I gallon X 12.45 per gallon = $12.45 ro ' a w w rn rr �■r �r " � r r rr r� rr r� � � � r r' r` r' r r DIRT PATH WITH BOARDWALK Page 2 of 2. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING ACTIONS FREQUENCY STANDARD PERSONNEL ANNUAL COSTS OPERATING CAPITAL 3. Replace Once per year 1 hour per year laborer I Sign Sign 1 hour X 2.90 per 1 sign X 10. per hour = $2.90 sign = $10.00 Concrete i bag X 2.65 per bag=_$2.65 Travel Time; Cleanup Time, Break $54.98 direct cost Time (Indirect Costs) - •781 = $70 total cost $70 - 54.98 = $15.02 21 productive hours - Supervisory Time (Park Foreman) •781 = 27 total hours. 27 X .36 = 10 supervisory hours 10 X $4.41 = $44.10 Total Dirt Path Cost Per Year = $237.43 $114.10 $42.85 $80.48 ro w w w J r= 'M == M M i M M M M = = = r = 1010 GRAVEL PATH With Sign Page 1 of 2 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING ACTIONS FREQUENCY STANDARD PERSONNEL ANNUAL COSTS OPERATING CAPITAL 1. Rake and Once per year 16 hours per Motor Equipment Gravel - Bucket Tractor Fill year Operator 10 tons X 5.72 hours X 10.06 or h8 ours X 3.61 per per ton = $57.20 per hour = $80.48 hour = $28.88 Dump Truck Laborer I 1 hour X 12.10 h$— ours X 2.90 per per hour $12.10 hour = $23.20 Truck Driver 2 hours X 3.61 per hour = $7.22 2. Replace Sign Once per year 1 hour per year Laborer I Sign (Vandalism) 1 hour X 2.90 per 1 sign X 10 per hour = $2.90 sign = $10.00 Concrete l bag X 2.65 per bag = $2.65 ro w w m w co M = = = = = = i M = M = M = r M GRAVEL PATH WITH SIGN Page 2 of 2 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING ACTIONS FREQUENCY STANDARD PERSONNEL ANNUAL COSTS OPERATING CAPITAL 62.20 direct costs - .781 = $79.64 Travel Time, Cleanup Time, Break total cost Time (indirect cost) 79.64 - 62.20 = $17'.44 indirect cost 19 productive hours - .781 = 24 total Supervisory Time (Park Foreman) hours - 24 X .36 = $8.64 supervisory hours 8.64 x 4.41 = $38.10 supervisory cost Total Gravel Path Cost Per Year $280.17 $117.74 $69.85 $92.58 ro a w w to NATURE TRAIL WITH MARKERS Page 1 of 2 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING ANNUAL COSTS ACTIONS FREQUENCY STANDARD PERSONNEL OPERATING CAPITAL 1. Refurbishing Once per season .25 hours per Laborer I Paint Trail Markers marker .25 hours per marker p 7 gallon X 7.00 (10 Markers) � X 10 markers X 2.90 per gallon = per hour = $7.25 $7.00 Posts 2. Replacement Replace 5 per 2 hours per Laborer I Posts of Trail Marker year marker 2 hours per marker 5 markers X 2.00 (Vandalism) X 5 markers X 2.90 per marker = per hour = $29.00 $10.00 Cement 2.5 bags X 2.65 = $6.63 3. Printing Ongoing $10,000 brochures Artist -(Design - Printing Trail Brochure per year Brochure) 10,000 brochures X 10 hours X 6.00 per $•03 per brochure = hour = $60.00 $300.00 NATURE TRAIL WITH MARKERS Page 2 of 2. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING ANNUAL COSTS ACTIONS FREQUENCY STANDARD PERSONNEL OPERATING CAPITAL Motor Equipment Wood Chips Tractor 4. Trail Total Resurface 8 hour - total Re -Surfacing Once per year resurface Operator -hours$ Total Resurfacing) $ hours X 5.50 Minor Resurfacing (Volunteer labor X 3.61 60 cubic yards X hour = $44.00 after 6.months for minor $28.80 10.00 per cubic use resurfacing) yars = $6 m oo (Minor) 30 cubic yards = $300.00 Travel Time, Cleanup Time; Break NOT Time (Indirect Costs) APPLICABLE Supervisory Time NOT APPLICABLE Total Nature Trail Cost Per Year - $492.68 $125.05 $323.63 $44.00 M = M = = M = = = M M PARKING FACILITY Page 1 of 2 Asphalt - One Dumpster MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING ANNUAL COSTS ACTIONS FREQUENCY STANDARD PERSONNEL OPERATING CAPITAL 1. Mowing Around Once per week .5 hours per Laborer Hand Mower The Outside of 26 weeks per week .5 hours X 2.90 .5 hours X .22 The Parking Lot season per hour X 26 weeks = P per hour X 2 6 $37.70 weeks = $2.86 2. Refuse Once per week .5 hours per Laborer Collection (52 weeks per week .5 hours X 2.90 year) per hour X 52 weeks = $75.40 3. Painting Once Per year 2 hours per Laborer Traffic Paint Lines on Pavement year 2 hours X 2.90 2 X per hour = $5.80 gallons per gallon = $5.68 4. Patching Once per year 1 hour.per Laborer I As halt Asphalt year 1 hour X 2.90 —L— $3.00 per bag X per hour = $2.90 3 bags = $9.00 5. Maintain Once per year 1 hour per Laborer Stain and Replace year 1 hour X 2.90 per 1 quart X per Signs hour = $2.90 quart = $ Signs 2 signs X 10.00 per sign = $20.00 PARKING FACILITY - Asphalt - One Dumpster Page 2 of 2. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING ACTIONS FREQUENCY STANDARD PERSONNEL ANNUAL COSTS OPERATING CAPITAL 6. Replacing Every 10 years Dumpster Dumpster $5 0 per replace- ment) $560 - 10 years $560 per year 124.70 direct cost - Travel Time; Cleanup Time; Break .781 = 159.66 total Time (Indirect Costs) cost. 159.66 - 124.70 = $34.96 indirect costs 43 productive hours - .781 = 55 total hours Supervisory Time (Park Foreman) 55 hours X .36 = 20 supervisory hours 20 hours X 4.41 per hour = $88.20 Total Parking Facilities Cost Per Year = $341.40 $247.96 $34.68 $58.86 ro w Ln cD w r� rr ri rr ■r �r r �r � r rr r rr r r rr �r � �r PLAY GROUND AREAS Page 1 of 2. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING ANNUAL COSTS ACTIONS FREQUENCY STANDARD PERSONNEL OPERATING CAPITAL 1. Mowing 26 weeks per One hour per Motor Equipment season (April 15- week Operator Mowin Tractor g October 15) .5 hours X 3.61 X 26 .5 hours X 7.70 weeks = $46.93 per hour X 26 Laborer I weeks = $100.10 .5 hours X 2.90 per Hand Mower hour X 26 weeks = $37.70 .5 hours X $.22 per hour X 26 weeks = $2.86 2. Refuse 52 weeks per .5 hours per Laborer Collection year - once week .5 hours X 2.90 per per week hour X 52 weeks _ $75.40 3. Painting Once per year 2 hours per Laborer I Paint Signs year 2 hours X 2.90 per 1 gallon of metal hour = $5.80 paint X 14.40 per gallon = $14.40 Stain 1 quart X 3.12 per quart = $3.12 ro w LQ cu ,a PLAYGROUND AREAS Page 2 of 2 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING ANNUAL COSTS ACTIONS FREQUENCY STANDARD PERSONNEL OPERATING CAPITAL 4. Spreading Wood Chips and Once per year 6 hours per Laborer I -.hours Wood Chips and Turf Tractor Mulch area X 2.90 per Mulch l hour X 7.70 hour = $17.40 $75 per load X 6 per hour = $7.70 loads = $450 Lilly Spreader .5 hours X 2.75 per hour = $1.38 5. Seeding Seed once per .5 hours per Laborer I Fertilizer and Fertilizing year year seeding 1.5 hours per 1 acre X 320 lbs X Fertilize twice 1 hour per year X 2.90 per 0.59 per 16 X 2 per year year fertilizing hour = $4.35 _ $37.76 Seed 1 acre X 150 lbs X $1.01 per lb = $151.50 $207 direct cost - Travel Time; Cleanup Time; Break .781 $265.04 total Time (Indirect Costs) costs $265. - 207 = $58 indirect cost 61 productive hours Supervisory Time (Park Foreman) - 781 = 78 total hours w 28 X 4.41 = $123.48 supervisory costs cD Total Playground Area Cost t Per Year = $1,137.88 $369.06 $656.78 $112.04 �■ r� r m r OW r m r r r r r r■ �■r r PICNIC SITES Page 1 of 3 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING ANNUAL COSTS ACTIONS FREQUENCY STANDARD PERSONNEL OPERATING, CAPITAL 1. Mowing 26 weeks per .5 hours per Motor Equipment Mowing Tractor season week Operator 7.70 per hour X .25 hours X 3.61 .25 hours X 26 per hour X 26 weeks = weeks = $50.05 $23.46 Laborer I Hand Mower .25 hours X 2.90 .25 hours X 22 hour X 52 weeks = per hour. X 26 $75.40 weeks = $1.43 2. Refuse Once per .5 hours per Laborer Collection week (52 weeks week 1.5 hours per year per year) X 2.90 hour - $4.35 3. Seeding and Fertilize twice l hour per Fertilizer Turf Tractor Fertilizing per year year -fertilize l acre X 320 lbs 1.5 hours X 7.70 per acre X .059 per hour=.$11.55 Seed once per .5.hours per per lb. X 2 year year - seed applications=$37.76 Lilly Spreader 1.5 hours X 2.75 Seed per hour = $4.13 1 acre X 150 lbs per acre X 1.01 per lb. = $151.50 PICNIC SITES Page 2 of 3 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING ACTIONS FREQUENCY STANDARD PERSONNEL ANNUAL COSTS OPERATING CAPITAL 4. Painting Once per year 3 hours per Laborer I Staining year 3 hours X 2.90 3 gallons X 12.45 Tables per hour = $8.70 per gallon=$37.35 Grills Aluminum Paint Signs 1 gallon X 13.50 Trash Cans per gallon = $13.50 Metal Paint 1 gallon X 14.40 per gallon = $14.40 5. Replacing Every 10 years 1 hour per Laborer I Tables Tables, Grills, replacement l hour X 2.90 10 tables X 90.00 and Cans per hour - per table - 10 10 years _ $.29 years = $90.00 per year per year Grills 10 gri.11s X 73.00 per grill - 10 years = $73.00 per year Cans 5 cans X 10.00 per can - 10 years = $5.00 peryear ro w w cD MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING ACTIONS FREQUENCY STANDARD PERSONNEL ANNUAL COSTS OPERATING CAPITAL 131.05 direct cost - Travel Time, Cleanup Time, Break .781 = $167.80 Time (indirect cost) total cost 167.80 - 131.05 = $36.75 indirect cost 44 productive hours - .781 = 56 total hours Supervisory Time (Park Foreman) 56 X .36 = 20 supervisory hours 20 x 4.41 = $88.20 supervisory costs Total Picnic Site Cost Per Year $745.67 $256 $254.51 $235.16 REST ROOM - CONCESSION BUILDING Page 1 of 2 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING ANNUAL COSTS ACTIONS FREQUENCY STANDARD PERSONNEL OPERATING CAPITAL 1. Janitorial 7 days per week 3 hours per da p y Laborer l Supplies Duties -Clean Rest 52 weeks per year 3 hours per day X 7 days Toilet Paper per week X 52 week X Face Towels rooms -Clean 2.90 per hour = $3,166.80 Ammonia con- Ajax cession area - Empty Trash Approximately $14 per week X 52 weeks $728.00 2. Utilities -Water. Water -Electricity $130 per season Electricity $52 per season 3. Building Ongoing $.45 per square $.24 per s.f. X 1200 s.f. $.24 per s.f. X Maintenance foot. (approximate) _ $288.00 1200 s.f. (.24 per s.f. for (Approximate) personnel costs) $28&.00 (.24 per s.f. for operating costs) ro w w cu rr rr r irr ■r r rr �r �r rr rr rr r arr �r r . ire �r r� REST ROOM - CONCESSION BUILDING Page 2 of 2 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING ANNUAL COSTS ACTIONS FREQUENCY STANDARD PERSONNEL OPERATING CAPITAL Travel Time; Cleanup Time; Break Time (Indirect Costs) Included Above Supervisory Time Not Applicable Total Rest Room -Concession Cost $345.80 $1,198.00 r� r r� rr r r rr. r� � r r r� r■� rr �r rr r� �r r� OVERLOOK AREA ON WATERWAY Page 1 of 2 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING ACTIONS FREQUENCY STANDARD PERSONNEL ANNUAL COSTS OPERATING CAPITAL 1. Trash Once per year 6 hours per Laborer I Pickup acre -hours Dump Truck per hour = $17.40 3 hours X 10.45 per hour = $31:35 2. Brush Once per year 2 hours per Laborer Removal acre 2 hours X 2.90 Dump Truck Per hour = $5.80 2 hours X 10.45 per hour = $20.90 OVERLOOK AREA OF WATERWAY Page 2 OF 2 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING ACTIONS FREQUENCY STANDARD PERSONNEL ANNUAL COSTS OPERATING CAPITAL $23.20 direct cost - Travel Time, Cleanup Time; .781 = $29.70 total Break Time (Indirect Cost) cost $29.70 - $23.20 - 6.50 indirect cost 13 productive hours - - .781 = 17 total Supervisory Time (Park Foreman) hours - 17 X .36 = 6 supervisory hours 6 X 4.41 per hour = $26.46 Total Overlook Area Cost Per Year $108.41 $56.16 $52.25 b w cu Ln N ■� r� r �r r� r u� r� rs rr � � � r r r� rr �r r� TENNIS COURT AREA- Two Tennis Courts Page 1 of 2 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING ANNUAL COSTS ACTIONS FREQUENCY STANDARD PERSONNEL OPERATING CAPITAL 1. Refuse 52 time per .5 hours per Laborer Collection year court area per .5 hours X 2.90 per collection per hour X 52 times _ $75.40 2. Vandalism Twice per year 1 hour to Laborer l Nets (Replacement replace items l hour X 2.90 1 net X 1.09 net of nets, poles, each time per hour X 2 times = $1.09 cranks, and = $4.80 benches) Cranks l crank X 14.00 per crank=$14.00 Sign -Rules and Regulations 1 sign X $12.50 per sign = $12.50 3. Replacement Replace legs 4 hours for Laborer I Le s of Benches every 10 years repairing legs •f—ors per year f0.00 per replace- x 2.90 per hour = ment) $40.00 - 10 Replace slats 1 hour for $1.16 years = $4.00 per every 5 years replacing slats year .2 hours per year fu X 2.90 per hour = Slats LQ $.58 15.00 per replace- ment) $15.00 - 5 w years = $30.00 per year TENNIS COURT AREA Page 2 of 2 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING ACTIONS FREQUENCY STANDARD PERSONNEL ANNUAL COSTS OPERATING CAPITAL 4. Refinish Every 5 years 160 man-hours taborer I Materials Courts for refinishing 160 hours X 2.90 (Coating, paint, two courts (4 per hour - 5 years etc.) crew members $464 per year $2,750 - 5 years for 5 days) _ $550 per year Travel Time, Cleanup Time, Break 546.94 direct .Time (indirect cost) cost - .781 = $700 $700 - 546.94 = $153.06 indirect cost Supervisory Time (Park Foreman) 41 productive hours - .781 = 78 total hours 78 X .36 = 28 supervisory hours 28 X-4.41 = $123.48 Total Tennis Court Area $823.48 $584.59 Costs Per Year = $1,408.07 ro A) w m Ln SOFTBALL FIELD Page 1 of 4 60 Foot Bases MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING ACTIONS FREQUENCY STANDARD PERSONNEL ANNUAL COSTS OPERATING CAPITAL 1. Mowing 34 times per .5 hours per Motor Equipment Mower season ball field plus Operator B.90 per hour X one hour per ,5 hours X 3.61 per .5 hours X 34 ball.field hour X 34 = $61.37 times = $149.60 Laborer l Hand Mower 1 hour X 2.90 per $,50 per hour X hour X 34 times = 1 hour X 34 times= $98.60 $17,00 2. Seeding and Fertilizer twice 2 hours for Motor Equipment Fertilizer Turf Tractor Fertilizing per year (early fertilizing Operator 320 lbs per acre 7 hours X8..00 Spring, late 7 hours per season per application X per hour = $56.00 F Fall). 5 hours for X 3.61 per hour = 2 acres X 2 appli- seeding $25.27 cations X .059 per Lilly Spreader Seed once per lb. = $75.52 7 hours X 3.00 " year per hour = $21.00 Seed 150 lbs. per acre X 2 acres X 1 appli- cation X 1.01 per lb. _ $303.00 SOFTBALL FIELD Page 2 of 4 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING ACTIONS FREQUENCY STANDARD PERSONNEL ANNUAL COSTS OPERATING CAPITAL 3. Initial Once per year 24 hours per Motor Equipment Sand Dump Truck Ball Field field per Operator 12 tons per year X 1 hour.per load Preparation season - 2F' hours per season 35.00 per ton X 4 loads X 12.10 3 man main- X 3.61 per hour = $420.00 per hour = $48.40 tenance crew $86.64 Clay 2+ tons per year X Loader Truck Driver 70.00 per ton = .33 hours per 1 hour per load $1,680.00 load X 4 loads X 4 loads X 3.61 One Pitching Rubber X 17.05 per per hour = $14.44 One Home Plate hour = $22.51 M-00 Heavy Equipment Operator .33 hours per load X 6.07 X 4 loads -$8.01 4. Dragging Once every two .5 hours per Motor Equipment Operator Rake and Infields games infield .5 hours per action Wooden Drag $6.50 (assuming 6 X 39 actions X per season games per week) 3.61 per hour=$70.40 3 times per week X .5 hours per action X 26 weeks per season = 39 times per season ro w w m Ln M SOFTBALL FIELDS Page 3 of 4 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING ANNUAL COSTS ACTIONS FREQUENCY STANDARD PERSONNEL OPERATING CAPITAL 5• Lining of Foul lines: Once Fowl Lines: One Laborer I (Fowl Lines) Lime Field (Foul per week. hour per week 1 hour per week X 26 100 - 50 lb bags'X Lines, Base Base Lines: Once Base Lines and weeks per season X 2.90 1.98 per bag = Lines & Batter per game Batter Boxes: per hour = $75.40 $198.00 Boxes) Batter Boxes: .5 hour per game Laborer I (Base Lines Once per game Batter Boxes) .5 hours per game X 6 games per week X 26 week per season X 2.90 per hour = $226.20 6. Ball Game Once per game 2 hours per game Laborer l Preparation - Setting Out — 2 hours per game Bases, Switching X 6 games per week Lights On & Off, X 26 weeks per season Picking Up Trash, X 2.90 per hour = $904.80 etc. 7. Preventative Replace Bleachers 26 hours per Laborer I Replacement of Maintenance on every 10 years. season (1 hour per 2Z hours per season X Bleachers Ball Field Replace backstops week during the 2.90 per hour = $75.40, $ 00 per replace - Structures and player cages season) ment) $400 = 10 every 20 years years = $40.00 per year Replacement of.Back- Stop & Player Cages 095 per replace- P, w ment) cD 4.495 - 20 years = u, $224.35 per year r r rr r r■i cur r i■■� r r r r r� WON r SOFTBALL FIELDS Page 4 of 4 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING ACTIONS FREQUENCY STANDARD PERSONNEL ANNUAL COSTS OPERATING CAPITAL Travel Time, Cleanup Time, Break 1,646.54 direct Time (indirect costs) cost - .781 = 2,108.25 total cost $2,108.25 - $1,646.54 _ $461.70 indirect cost 549 productive hours - .781 = Supervisory Time (Park Foreman) 703 total hours 703 X .36 = 253 supervisory hours 253 X 4.41 = $1,115.73 Total Softball Field Cost Per Year $6,529.25 $3,223.97 $2,719.52 $585.76- ro w w m 1 co 1 1 1 1 NOTE: Ratio of productive (direct) man hours per day to total man hours per day, calculated as follows: 8 hours per, day - .5 hours for breaks - .25 hours per day cleanup -.5 hours per day for travel to first site and from last site - .5 hours for travel between sites during the day = 6.25 productive (direct) hours per day - 8 .781. ADDENDUM TO MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE Boat Bench Should be maintained on regular daily scheduling during season (April 15 - November 15). Regular trash pickup plus raking. One laborer, one hour per week. Masonboro Island Although an area of low intensity usage, a schedule of regular maintenance should be established including the emptying of trash recepticles, repairs to boardwalk when needed, and care of local flora and fanna. Page 59 1 VI. LABOR FORCE REQUIREMENTS: .' The present labor force available for park maintenance consists of the following: 1 Parks Foreman 5 Laborers 1 In order to adequately maintain the proposed four additional areas and facilities, it is recommended that the following labor force be made avialable for parks maintenance: ' 1 Laborer III 1 Laborer II (Light Equipment Operator) 4 Laborers 1 The Laborer III would assume some leadership responsibilities. The light Equipment operator would operate equipment necessary to open spaces. maintain ball fields, picnic areas and related Page 60 -qhbm. VII. EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS: The following equipment is available for maintenance of county parks: r 1 1 front end loader 1 dump truck 1 motor grader 4 tractors with bushog 1 tilt bed backhoe 1 sweeper 4 Yazoo riding mowers 1 400 John Deere tractor mower 1 Diesel tractor bushog 5 push mowers 1 tiller We recommend purchase of the following additional equipment for maintaining the additional acres being added to the County Parks System: 1 dump truck 1 400 John Deere tractor mower 2 push mowers Page 61 OF40 ■ UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE P. 0. Box 248, Burgaw, North Carolina 28425 Telephone 919-259-4305 ' June 4, 1979 Mr. James S. Stevens, III New Hanover County Recreation Dept. 320 Chestnut Street Wilmington, N. C. 28401 Dear Mr. Stevens: ■ The Soil Conservation Service has evaluated the soil, water, and related .resource factors on the proposed park sites for New Hanover County. We — examined the following sites: (1) Castle Hayne Park, (2) Snow's Cut, and (3) Arrowhead Park. We discussed the site plans for Masonboro Island Park but did not visit the site due to its inaccessability to us. Castle Hayne Park - The soils on this site were mapped as Kenansville fine sand and Lakeland sand. Both of these soils can give problems with the establishment of vegetative cover. They are real sandy and do not have much moisture available for use by plants. I would recommend using drought tolerant grasses on the open areas; such as, Bermudagrass, Bahiagrass, etc. In the areas that have a lot of trees it will be difficult to get any grasses growing and low light plants will be needed. With trails and picnic areas it would be best to leave this area in natural vegetation. Around the existing boat launching ramp we found some erosion problems. Water running off the old pavement and the parking area has eroded a gully to the river. A diversion should be planned and constructed to divert the runoff to a paved chute that will safely carry the flow to the river. As plans progress I will be glad to work with you on that part. We also found two hills of fire ants on the site. These ants could cause a lot of physical harm to people and possibly cause some liability to the County. I would reccm.mcnd that steps be taken to eradicate these pests. Contact the N. C. Dept. of Agriculture or APHIS with USDA at the Airport for help. ■ The soils around the community center is a Kenansville fine sand. This soil has slight limitations for septic tank absorption fields due to the high permeability of the soil. The system should be placed as far as possible from the river. Snow's Cut - The main problem and most important problem is erosion control. ' The entire shore line with the exception of the marsh areas and the rip -rapped areas are experiencing severe erosion problems. Any structures placed near the edge of the cut could be in danger. ■ ■ Page 62 -2- June 4, 1979 There are numerous gullies on the site caused by people walking down to the beach area. I would recommend that stairways be provided from the top to the beach. Then•plants can be introduced to cover the erosion.or natural vegetation will come back. In some places it might require additional measures. At the request of the County, I can submit a plan for erosion control for this site if something feasible can be planned. This area will also need drought resistant plants for re-establishment of vegetative cover. The sites discussed for septic tanks are on Wakulla sand. This soil has slight limitations for septic tank absorption fields due to the high per- meability of the soil. The systems should be installed as far as possible from the water's edge. The erosion problem might be reduced if the speed of traffic in Snow's Cut was reduced. The heavy water traffic sends some rough waves into the beach undercutting the bank. The County could approach the Coast Guard, or Corps of Engineers, to see about a "No -Wake" zone for this area. If you are plan- ning to beach boats on this stretch of shore then you will need a "No -Wake" zone. Arrowhead Park - Arrowhead has the sandy soil problem also. It will be extremely---dTTficult for vegetation to get established on the playing fields without irrigation and a lot of fertilizer. Bermudagrass or Bahiagrass should be considered for these areas. The diverting of the existing drainage ditch will be a problem. With the topography of the area the drain cannot be moved easily. The cost of piping the drain will be extremely expensive also. I would suggest that the possi- bility of diverting the ditch into the existing pond be explored... Calculations could be made based on drainage area, runoff, permeability, etc., to see if this would work. The pond should not be partially filled as planned. An observation walk should be provided and this area used as a nature pond for the school and other people. This is a natural study area. Masonboro Island - We felt that the little impact that the observation tower would have in areas that we will be concerned with did not justify the time involved to go the site. We discussed the site with Frank Olive, New Hanover County Health Dept., since he has visited the site, and we do not see any problems. Native vegetation should be used if any vegetative plantings are planned. If we can help further with the plans and implementation of these plans, please feel free to call on us. Page 63 t - 3 - June 4, 1979 ' Always interested in the proper development of New Hanover County, I am Sincerely yours, ' /Alohn M. Ray,'Jr. District Conserva onist cc: Derick G. S. Davis & Assoc. ' 713 Princess Street Wilmington, N. C. 28401 i 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 ' Page 64 WILMINGTON - NEW HANOVER f '�"`�`'�� �� 4, yf Planning Department P.O. Box 1810 F�"°Rt Wilmington, N.C. 28402 rJuly 27, 1979 ' Mr. Steve Stevens, Director New Hanover County Parks and Recreation Department County Administration Building Wilmington, N.C. 28401 Re: Wilmington -New Hanover Planning Department Review of Proposed Park Development Program. Dear 11r. Stevens: Thank you for allowing Mr. Glenn Harbeck and myself the opportunities to review the Proposed County Park Development Program with you and representives from Derrick G. S. Davis and Associates. Mr. Harbeck and I have concluded our final review of the plans and the pre- ' liminary report. In general, we feel each proposed park as planned is an appro- priate land use with full consideration given to the available property con- figurations and its general location within New Hanover County. Specific minor comments have been noted in the text of the preliminary report for your benefit, but all of the earlier comments submitted by Mr. Harbeck and myself have been addressed on the plans. - Please let us know if you have any further questions. Very truly yours, j Charles A. Lilley Senior Planner Growth Management Section CAL/ef Page 65