Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996 Land Use Plan-1997 000 , Chapter Page 1. Introduction 1 2. 3. Economy 13 4, Transportation 23 5. Land & Water Use 34 6. Natural and Cultural Features 44 7. County Facilities 61 8. Storm Hazards 73 9. Growth Management Plan 81 10. Implementation Plan 87 Appendix 1. Public Input Results 99 2. Relationship of Land Use Plan to CAMA Regulations 114 3. Water.Supply Plan 116 4. Recreation Areas 127 5. Status of 1990 Land Use Plan Policies 130 6. NCDOT Street Assessment 141 7. Current Plans, Policies, and Regulations 143 CHAPTER 1 Draft 1/12/97 i .1990 Currituck County Land Use Plan Currituck County, known as the Land of the Roads Virginia, Currituck is one of the fastest rWild Goose, is located in the northeastern growing counties in the state. Between 1990 most corner of North Carolina (Figure 1.1). With and 1994, Currituck ranked fifth in rate of growth miles of shore lines, a high quality of life, low out of North Carolina's 100 counties. ' In 1974, the State of North Carolina adopted the is common) known. This Act requires coastal P Y q Coastal Area Management Act or CAMA as it communities to prepare land use plans as a 1 1 J means of guiding the development of land instead of recommending a specific over a ten year period. According to CAMA site be used for commercial purposes ' regulations, land use plans must be updated (zoning assigns uses to specific every five years. The 1996 Currituck County properties), the land use plan would Land Use Plan will be the fourth update since state that a certain amount of i 1976. residential development would require a certain amount of commercial The State requires land use plans be prepared development in order to adequately , for all coastal North Carolina communities. service that area. Adopting such a plan reflects sound planning and should be prepared in all local 3. The plan focuses on the physical jurisdictions regardless of location. Land use development of the county. It plans are particularly critical for areas facing describes how, why, when and where rapid growth, such as Currituck County. to build, rebuild or preserve the county. While the land use plan is not a health , plan, a social service delivery plan, or Description of a Land Use Plan an economic development plan, it will encompass elements contained in The 1996 Currituck County Land Use Plan is an each. official public document adopted by the County Commissioners and the Coastal 4. The plan is comprehensive in that it Resources Commission that contains includes all areas within the county. information about the physical development Further, the plan includes all elements of the county as it exists today, what directions which have a bearing on the physical the county should take in the future, and what development of the county (i.e. steps need to be taken in order to get there. environment, utilities, transportation, The plan will be used by local leaders to guide housing, etc.). decisions affecting land development in the county. Use of the plan will lead to more 5. The plan is long range in that it projects efficient and economical provisions of public an image of the county ten years into services, the protection of natural resources, the future. sound economic development, and the ' protection of public health, safety and welfare. Purposes of a Land Use Plan Although Currituck County uses the term land While the land use plan serves many use plan, phrases such as master plan, functions, the primary purposes are as follows: general plan, comprehensive plan and long range plan have the same meaning. I. Land use plans help communities Generally there are five principal answer questions about how to characteristics of a land use plan. They are coordinate the development of land in as follows: order to serve the public interests. Elements affecting the public Interests I. The plan contains policy statements. include: These policies are established through the identification of community goals A. Health and Safety (i.e. what areas (broad statements describing the of the community can or cannot values of a community) and strategies support higher concentrations of (courses of action to be taken in order development?); ' to fulfill community goals and objectives). B. Convenience (i.e. where should streets be located to improve , 2. The plan Is general in that its circulation?; are commercial recommendations are areawide areas adequate to serve the rather than site specific. For example, needs of a neighborhood?); 2 C. Efficiency (i.e. what land use arrangement is the most efficient and least costly to the citizens and the county?); D. Environmental Quality (i.e. how should development be handled along flood prone areas?); E. Social Equity and Social Choice (i.e. in applying densities and locations for residential development, will there be adequate access and freedom _of choice for residents seeking housing opportunities?); F. Amenities (i.e. while "attractiveness" means different things to different people, can a consensus be reached on strategies to improve our surroundings such as special appearance provisions along entrances into the county?) 2. The land use plan provides a policy guide to decision making. As can be seen in #1 above, elements affecting public interests can sometimes overlap (i.e.. environmental quality and amenities) and at other times may conflict (i.e. health and safety and efficiency). By identifying community values and establishing goals and objectives based on those values, appointed and elected officials can use the land use plan to guide their decision making on matters related to the physical development of the county. Typical decisions facing appointed and elected officials Include rezoning requests and proposals to change land use regulations. 3. The land use plan provides a legal basis for decision making. Article 19, Chapter 160A-383 of the North Carolina Statutes states in part that "Zoning regulations shall be made in accordance with a comprehensive plan...". Literal interpretation of this language has been argued for decades because zoning often occurred before the comprehensive plan or land use plan. However, clear . signals are being sent from the courts that when challenged, development codes stand a better chance of being upheld when they are based on a land use plan, as opposed to evolving as a result of ad -hoc decisions as is the case in the absence of a land use plan. 4. The land use plan is used by the public, developers, administrators, etc. in order to obtain facts about the county. For example, comprehensive plans are often used by existing businesses to aide them in making future plans related to expansions and by new businesses who wish to assess the desirability of locating in Currituck County. 5. The land use plan is used by state and federal agencies in making decisions concerning the issuance of various permits and to help determine grant recipients for projects. Relationship of the Land Use Plan to Other Documents Land use plans are often confused with other documents, namely zoning codes, subdivision regulations, and capital improvement plans. Zoning codes (describing where certain land uses can locate in a county), subdivision regulations (describing how to divide land) and capital improvement plans (describing plans for growth by local government - i.e. construction of a fire station) are tools used by counties to implement the goals and objectives found in the land use plan (Figure 1.2). For example, the land use plan may establish a goal of providing more recreational opportunities for residents in the county. This goal may be achieved by: amending the zoning code to allow commercial recreational uses in more zoning districts, adjusting subdivision regulations in order to require the construction of recreational areas in housing developments, and by setting aside money In the capital improvements plan for such items as boat accesses. Figure 1.2 Relationship of Land Use Plan to Other Documents Currituck Land Use Plan (establishes goals and objectives for Currituck County) Zoning Capital Subdivision Regulations Improvement Regulations Plan (toots used to implement the goals and objectives found in the land use plan) Preparation and Maintenance of the Land Use Plan The key to success in implementing a land use plan is having public input and acceptance. The first step in devising a land use plan that reflects the varied interests found in the county was to assign the nine member Planning Board, with representatives from each of the four townships, the responsibility of preparing the plan. Staff assistance was provided by the Currituck County Planning and Inspections Department. Realizing that not all interests are represented by the Planning Board, the public was provided an opportunity to participate in the development of the land use plan through community meetings and public hearings. It was the opinion of the Planning Board that attaining stated goals would only be possible through an extraordinary effort to obtain public input (Figure 1.3). In keeping with that realization, a series of seven public meetings were held around the county prior to drafting the plan in order to identify the thoughts, concerns, and desires of county residents. All totaled, the initial meetings were attended by over 130 residents. Each person in attendance was given the opportunity to respond to the question "What Does Currituck County Need To Do In Order To Improve The Quality Of Life For It's Citizens Over The Next Ten Years?". Results from these meetings helped the Planning Board identify issues important to residents of Currituck County (see Appendix 1). In addition to the public meetings, a random sample survey was sent to 789 residents and property owners to further assess public attitudes towards growth and development. In all, 553 people returned the survey for an unusually high response rate of 71 %. By conducting the survey in this manner, Currituck County was to a margin of error +/- 5%. While public attitudes were being assessed through community meetings and a mail- F� out survey, the Planning and Inspections Department collected data relating to ' growth patterns, the economy, land use, the environment, and other matters affecting the physical development of Currituck County. This data, along with information collected during the public input meetings and survey, provided the foundation for preparing a draft land use plan. Once a preliminary draft of the land use plan was prepared, the Planning Board held another hearing on the proposal. Once the 1996 Land Use Plan was endorsed by the Planning Board, it was sent to the Board of Commissioners for a public hearing and adoption. Public Participation Program 1996 Land Use Plan 1. Appoint Planning Board to update 1996 Land Use Plan. 2. Hold seven public meetings around the county to obtain input on public concerns and issues. Meetings attended by nearly 135 people. 3. Mail 789 random surveys to residents and property owners in the county to further identify public thoughts and concerns. 553 surveys were returned (71% response rate) with a margin of error of +/-5%. 4. Draft of plan is reviewed during public meetings of the Planning Board. 5. Goals and Strategies draft mailed to interested citizens who attended public input meetings. 6. Final Draft of 1996 Land Use Plan is reviewed and endorsed by the Planning Board during a public meeting. 7. Board of Commissioners hold public hearing and adopt 1996 Land Use Plan. Now that the Land Use Plan has been consistent with public attitudes. This adopted by the County Commissioners and involvement was seen as an essential first been certified by the Coastal Resources step towards eventual implementation of r Commission, ongoing maintenance of the those goals and strategies. ;., plan will be the responsibility of the Planning Board. It is recommended that the land use While success in carrying out the land use plan be reviewed on an annual basis to plan's goals and strategies is dependent on determine if adjustments are warranted many. factors including among other things based on changing conditions and to the local government's commitment to the assess the attainment of recommended goals and strategies. A thorough update of plan, accuracy of the plan, and economic. conditions, continued public participation in the Land Use Plan will occur in 2001 in land use planning issues will remain a critical accordance with CAMA regulations. component. Currituck County acknowledges the importance of continued public participation In land use planning. Continued Public Participation Every effort will be made to allow input not only from interested citizens, but from all Involving the public during the preparation of agencies involved in the comprehensive the land use plan enabled the county to planning program established over the next recommend goals and strategies five years. 1 5 GOAL 1.1: TO ENCOURAGE MAXIMUM PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN THE LAND USE PLANNING PROCESS. Strategies: 1. Encourage the use of citizen advisory groups to help formulate policies on land use issues facing the county; 2. Have all agencies with tasks outlined in the land use plan report on an annual basis to the Planning Board on the status of implementing strategies. Organization of the 1996 Currituck County Land Use Plan The 1996 Land Use Plan contains chapters on population, economy, transportation, land and water use, natural and cultural features, county facilities and storm hazards. Each chapter provides an overview of these topics and contains long range county goals where appropriate. All goals are followed by one or more strategies, that have been identified, to assist in achieving goals established in the 1996 Currituck County Land Use Plan. The land use plan also contains a growth management plan that includes a land classification map outlining recommended land use patterns for Currituck County. Development patterns outlined on the land classification map are consistent with goals that have been established in preceding chapters. The final chapter is a recommended five year work program where all goals and strategies established in earlier chapters are restated. To assist in the implementation of land use plan recommendations, each strategy stated in the work program is assigned to one or more agencies and a time frame is established for completion. The recommended five year work program reflects the commitment of the Planning Board and the Board of Commissioners to achieve goals established in the 1996 Currituck County Land Use Plan. 5-1 GHAPTER.�" POPULATION Throughout the 1970's, 1980's and 1990's, Currituck County experienced a phenomenal increase in population which is expected to continue into the next century. This growth is attributed to several factors, including: close proximity to the metropolitan area of Hampton Roads Virginia and Dare County North Carolina; low tax rates and housing costs compared to cities in Virginia; a high quality of life; and the abundance of desirable shoreline property along the ocean, sounds, rivers, and bays. Between 1980 and 1990 Currituck's population increased by 23.9% or 2.4% per year making r_. I Currituck the eighth fastest growing county in North Carolina, The 1990's have seen population growth further accelerate. Between 1990 and 1995, Currituck County's population Increased 17.1% or 3.4% per year. According to the U.S. Bureau of the Census, Currituck County was the 5th fastest growing county in North Carolina between 1990 and 1995. The speed of Currituck's population growth becomes evident when compared with current and expected increases anticipated for northeastern North Carolina and the State (fable 2A). Population: 1940 - 1995 Chit wk %Change Year Pooulatiion %Change RegianR* State 1940 6,709 - - - 1950 6,201 -7.6 - - 1960 6,601 +6.5 - - 1970 6,976 +5.7 - - 1980 11,089 +59.0 - - 1990 13,736 +23.9 +13.9 +12.7 1995** 16,404 +19.4 + 7.8 + 8.5 2000'* 18,642 +13.6 - - 2005** 20,791 +11.5 - - *Region R consists of Camden, Chowan, Currituck, Dare, Gates, Hyde, Pasquotank, Perquimans, Tyrrell, and Washington Counties ** Currituck County Planning and Inspections Currituck County has four townships: Moyock, Crawford, Poplar Branch, and Fruitville (Figure 2.1). Crawford Township has the largest 7 population of the four townships followed by Poplar Branch, Moyock, and Fruitville (Table 2B). I11a Figure 2.1 Currituck County Townships Virginia Fruilville Moyock`• f ' s Crawford Poplar • _3 Branch ') a wawa, Currltuck County Population By Township 1960-2005 MMM. hw MW / * LCM io * MOM io * Leo /b* io io io Moyock 1,207 (18) 1,494 (21) 3,095 (28) 3,091(23) 4,180(26) 4,982(27) 5,776(28) Crawford 2,332(35 Z497(36) 3,974(36) 4,936(36) 5,574(34) 6,121(33) 6,643((32) PoplarBrandi Z622(40) Z497(36) 3,114(28) 4,570(33) 5,302(32) 6,016(32) 6,679(32) l iutville Total Oaunty 6,601 6,976 11,089 13,736 16,404 18,642 20,791 Population *Census Data ** Currituck County Planning and Inspections Department Projections According to Table 213, between 1980 and 1990, Moyock Township's population dropped by 4 persons. However, this drop was a result of approximately 310 mobile homes being removed from a mobile home park within this township In the 1980's due to Insufficient sewage treatment facilities. The removal of these mobile homes have hidden the fact that Moyock Township, with its close proximity to Hampton Roads Virginia, is the fastest growing township in Currituck County since the late 1980's. 1 Between 1990 and 1995, Moyock Township's population has grown faster than Currituck's other townships and this trend is expected to continue into the future. Population growth for Crawford, Poplar Branch, and Fruitville Townships is expected to remain steady to the year 2005. .It is not anticipated that construction of the Mid-Currituck Sound Bridge connecting the mainland with the outer banks (see Chapter on Transportation) will have much effect on the 10 year population projections as completion is not anticipated until 2004. Once constructed, the number of full-time residents on the outer banks is not expected to increase dramatically as housing prices and building construction will continue to be geared toward rental occupancy. The mainland is expected to see some Increase in development as a result of constructing the mid -sound bridge, particularly non-residential. However, residential development will be limited in the near term due to the county's ,adequate public facilities ordinance and the residential three acre minimum lot size within close proximity to the approximate location of the mid -sound bridge. Between 1970 and 1990, minority population declined while the total population increased dramatically. It is anticipated that the non- white population will remain fairly constant over the 10 year planning period while the white population will continue to increase at a rapid pace. As a result, the percentage of non -white population will decrease from 12.3% in 1990 to an estimated 8.3% in 2005.(fable 2C). Currituck Gountls Non -White Population TOW Nan -Witte %Non - Yew BMA499M Pom&tion White 1970 6,976 1,847 26.5 ' 1980 11,089 1,833 16.5 1990 13,736 1,685 12.3 2000*" 18,642 1,734 9.3 2005*' 20,791 1,726 8.3 11 **Currituck County Plann A breakdown of population by age groups indicates some shifts have occurred between 1970 and 1990. During that time frame, the 0-19 age group decreased as a percent of population while the 20-39 and 40-59 age groups Increased. The 60 and older age group remained at 17% of the total population during that time frame. Estimates for 2000 and I 2 and Inspections Office 2005 shows a sharp Increase in the 40-59 age bracket and to a lesser extent the 60+ age group Increases. This adjustment to the age groups reflects the in -migration of household from Hampton Roads Virginia. The 0-19 and 20-39 age groups, while increasing, are not expanding at the same pace as the other age groups. (Table 2D), Table 2D Currltuck County's Population By Age At 9m END 19BD 19eo MOD, 2005* 0-19 2,579 (37%) 3,543 (32%) 4,121 (30%) 4,785 (26%) 4,915 (24%) 20-39 1,543 (22%) 3,329 (30%) 4,258 (31%) 5,045 (27%) 5,547 (27%) 40-59 1,639 (24%) 2,334 (210/6) 3,022 (22%) 5,475 (29%) 6,358 (310/6) 60+ 1,215 (17%) 1,883 (17%) 2,335 (17%) 3,337 (18%) 3,971 (19%) *Currituck County Planning and Inspections Office Like other coastal communities, the summer season marks a dramatic increase in population. On the mainland, an assortment of campgrounds, cottages, tents, and motels are available while the Outer Banks offers rental housing units to seasonal guests. According to area Realtors, each rental unit on the Currituck Outer Banks during a typical summer week is occupied by between 10 and 15 persons. For purposes of establishing a seasonal population figure, it is estimated that each outer banks rental unit will average 13 persons. The high number of persons occupying rental units reflects the size of dwelling units constructed on Currituck's Outer Banks. In 1995, 52% of the homes constructed on the Currituck Outer Banks were over 5,000 sq. ft. in area. All totaled, the estimated peak summer population was 25,465 in July, 1995 (Table 2E). When the figure is added to a year round population of 16,404, the total population during the peak season in 1995 was estimated to be 41,896. In light of land use regulations prohibiting the expansion of campgrounds, it is not anticipated the number of seasonal housing units on the mainland will expand. However, construction of rental housing units on the Outer Banks has steadily increased. It is anticipated that over 1,100 additional rental units will be built between 1995 and 2004. When considered with permanent population projections, it is anticipated that the total peak seasonal population will be slightly over 61,037 in the year 2005 (fable 2F). Table 2E Gurrituck County's 1995 Peak Seasonal Population sonal Acconunodations Units P Population IMAINIJM* 1. Campgrounds 219 3.8 832 2. Cottages 2D 6.7 134 3. Tents 50 3.8 190 4. Motels 25 3.6 90 OITI'ER BANKS** 1 Seasonal Housing 1BM 13 24,219 Total Seasonal Counts 2,177 - 25,465 *County of Currituck Mainland Water Facilities Study, December 1989 **Currituck County Planning and Inspections Department L 1 1, 1 1 10 Table 2F Currituck Countls Estimated Total Population During Summer Season' Seasonal Population Year Hgpdog Units Seasonal Permanent Total 1995 2,177 25.465 16,404 41,896 2005 3,314 40246 20,791 61,037 Summary Throughout much of the 1900's, Currituck ` .s Count ' population remained stead Y P P Y However, the 1970's marked the beginning of a tremendous population increase that is expected to continue well into the year 2000 (Figure 2.2). ire 2.2 Currltuck Gountls Year Round Population 25,000 20,000 _ /■ o 15,000 /, � c 10,000 / a 5,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln 0 LO Nt Un co 1 0 rn 0 0 0 0 M rn rn M rn rn 0 0 T T T T T T T N N Year I Below is a summary of data presented in this chapter along with Implications of population growth in Currituck County. 1 - Currituck County has been and will continue to be one of the fastest growing counties in the state due to it's ' close proximity to the ocean and Hampton Roads Virginia. 11 -.Moyock has been and will continue to be the fastest growing township in the county followed by Poplar Branch and Crawford. - The county's non -white population has declined in numbers since 1970. By the year 2005, It is anticipated that the non- white population will represent 8.3% of ) 'L1 the total county population. In 1970, the non -white population, represented 26.5% of the total population. - The make-up of age groups within the county is expected to shift between 1990 and 2005. The 40-59 age group is expected increase at a higher rate than the other age groups; this reflects migration of families from the Hampton Roads area. - In 1995, the county's population increased 155% during the summer season. By 2005, it is anticipated that the county's population will increase by 193% during summer months. This points to a critical need for additional county services on the Currituck Outer Banks. Further implications of population growth can also be found in Chapter 5, Land and Water Use, and Chapter 7, County Facilities. 12 1 1 1 GHAPTER'3 Draft 1/12/97 ECONOMY Currituck County's close proximity to Norfolk, unemployment rate has remained relatively Viriginia Beach, Chesapeake, Elizabeth City, stable at just over 3%. and Dare County, along with a growing local economy, has resulted in numerous job Personal Income in Currituck County has opportunities for area residents. As illustrated in continued to grow over the years. Between Table 3A, Currituck's labor force increased by 1984 and 1992, per capita income increased by 9% between 1.990 and 1994 and its 60% (fable 3B). Table 3A Labor Force By Place Of Residence In Currituck County DESCRIPTION 19M 1991 1992 19W 1994 Civilian Labor Force 6,980 7,190 7,110 7,310 7480 Employment, Total 6,750 6,870 6,860 7,030 7240 Unemployment, Total 230 320 320 280 240 Rate of Unemployment 3.3% 4.5% 3.5% 3.8% 3.2% Source: North Carolina Employment Security Commission Table 3B Per Capita Personal Income yea 1984 1968 1992 Per Capita Income (dollars) 9,292 11,757 14,834 Source: North Carolina Employment Security Commission In 1984, 27% of Currituck's labor force worked in the county for a total of 1,838 jobs (Table 3C). As of 1994, 40% of Currituck's labor force found employment within the county totaling 3,020 jobs. This represents a 64% increase in jobs 13 between 1984 and 1994. During this some time period, Currituck County's population increase by 35%. In other words, jobs are being created at a faster rate than Currituck's population growth. In 1994, the top three employment sectors in Currituck County were retail and wholesale trade, followed by government and services (Table 3C and 3D). In 1984, the top three employment sectors were government, retail* and wholesale trade, and agriculture. As can be seen in Table 3C, employment in agriculture has dropped significantly in relation to the number of jobs in Currituck. In 1984, agriculture accounted for 20% of the jobs in Currituck County. By 1994, agriculture accounted for only 8% of the jobs in the county. Employment in the construction sector increased 109% between 1984 and 1994 reflecting the rapid growth rate in Currituck County. However, during that some time period the manufacturing sector had 13% fewer jobs. In 1993 Currituck County established and Economic Development Board and the Economic Development Department in an effort to recruit employers, including those in the manufacturing sector. The retail and wholesale trade industry accounted for 31% of Currituck's labor force in 1994; the largest employment sector in the county. In 1984, it accounted for 24% of the county's labor force. Between 1984 and 1994, the number of jobs in the retail and wholesale trade industry increased by 109%. This Increase in employment can be attributed largely to the location of three new major shopping centers in the county (2 on the outer banks, one on the mainland). Table 3E, showing gross retails sales in the county, further illustrates the dramatic increase in Currituck's retail trade between 1985 and 1994. Table 3C Employment Wlthin Currituck County Employment By Place of Work 1984 1986 1988 1990` 1992 1994 Form 370 310 290 240 240 240 Goods Producing Construction 110 130 200 230 160 230 Manufacturing 8D 100 70 90 40 70 Service Producing Trans, Comm., Public Util. 40 40 50 60 70 50 Trade 450 540 680 670 760 940 Fin., Ins., & Real Estate 30 60 60 80 70 100 Service & Miscellaneous Government 190 270 330 5W 420 500 TOTAL M 1,840 M 2020 630 2310 730 2630 830 2590 890 3,020 % Of Total Work Force 27 28 25 38* 36 40 Source: North Carolina Employment Security Commission * Incorporated into Hampton Roads MSA, data computed differently 1 11 14 1' 1 Table 3D Currituck County Employment By Sector 1984-1994 1000 900 800 1984' y c°'i 700 ❑ 1986' a 600 'E 1988' w 500 %- 400 ® 1990' a Z300 01992' i. .X 200 ❑ 1994' 100 0 - °' o c a. _ co osCU CD o� c c E ._ y CO ao> E CO CM o ~U ``°� ii� c°n' Ucz 15 While the government sector is the second largest employer in Currituck County, as a percent of the total labor force, government has dropped slightly from 31 % in 1984 to 29% in 1994. The finance, insurance and real estate sector and the service sector had the highest percentage of growth between 1984 and 1994. Employment in the finance, Insurance and real estate sector increased 233%during that time period while the number of service sector jobs grew by 163%. Economic Development Loss of employees in the manufacturing sector between 1984 and 1994 is of great concern to Currituck County. Another concern is the fact that a majority of residents find work outside of Currituck County. Of the 7,240 residents who had jobs in Currituck County in 1994, only 3,020 or 42% actually worked in the county. The remaining 58% of workers found employment outside of Currituck County. In 1990, of the 6,750 residents who had jobs, 2,630 or 39% found employment in Currituck County. In 1984, only 29% of Currituck's labor force held jobs in Currituck County. While the number of Currituck residents who found employment within the county has steadily increased between 1984 and 1994 from 29% to 42%, the financial implications of being a place where people live but a majority go elsewhere to work (i.e. bedroom community) are significant. Numerous studies have shown in general, residential development uses more tax dollars In services provided (i.e. schools, health, etc.) than it provides in taxes. Conversely, agriculture, commercial, and industrial development generally pays more tax dollars than services used. Therefore, for the financial health of Currituck County, it is important that Currituck continue the trend of increasing the number of jobs available within the county. Marketing for business recruitment and economic development is highly competitive. For Currituck County to be successful, it must assess its strengths and weaknesses and focus energies on those businesses that would be most attracted to what the county has to offer. One of the strengths Currituck County has to offer perspective businesses is a high quality of life. Few locations provide the variety of natural amenities such as sounds, rivers, and ocean. To keep this competitive advantage, Currituck must be careful not to attract. development that would degrade these important natural resources. In 1993, the Currituck County Economic Development Board endorsed 10 strategies to improve Currituck County's economy over the next twenty years. These strategies are outlined below in figure 3.1. Figure 3.1 CURRITUCK COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1993 1. Expand the economic base by nurturing existing businesses and recruiting new businesses. 2. Increase employment opportunities at all levels through education and skilled training which is essential to economic growth. 3. To continue to develop a safe and efficient movement of traffic along all primary and secondary roadways that will in turn enhance economic development. 4. Develop adequate environmental protection guidelines to preserve Currituck County's pristine environment leading to economic growth. 16 r 5. Rejuvenate the historical and recreational heritage that has always attracted tourists and sportsman to Currituck County. 6. Develop and expand tourism sector to increase our economic base and occupancy tax. 7. Involve the Airport Authority in promoting new aviation driven businesses to locate in the adjoining industrial park to take full advantage Currituck County's. airport. 8. Continue to promote efforts to fund and build a mid -county bridge thereby establishing a more efficient and safe Outer Banks access and improving the economic sector of mainland Currituck County. 9. Develop. a plan for police and fire protection for all businesses and industrial parks to protect the economic base in Currituck County. 10. Strengthen and broaden economic development through economic development training. Periodically, the Economic Development Board should review the above noted strategies and- recommendations to implement those strategies and adjust according to economic conditions. GOAL 3.1: CONTINUE TO EXPAND THE ECONOMIC BASE Of CURRITUCK COUNTY TO IMPROVE EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES WHILE ENSURING ADEQUATE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. Strategies: 1. The Economic Development Board should continue to focus on strategies to improve economic development in the county allowing input from elected officials, appointed officials and the general public. Strategies should be reviewed periodically and adjusted according to economic conditions. 2. Recruit industries that will not have a negative impact on Currituck County's fragile environment (i.e., minimal effect on water quality, no excessive smoke and noise, etc.);development in Currituck. 3. Promote the location of light industrial, wholesale and warehouse operations in the county in areas best suited for such uses. Characteristics of a suitable location include: -transportation facilities are adequate to meet the needs of the use and would not place an undue burden on local roads; -the use is adequately buffered by physical and natural barriers from residential uses and would not detract from the quality of life enjoyed by neighbors; -the use would not detract from the rural character of the area; -the use has adequate access to utilities; -the use does not locate in an area that is environmentally sensitive. Agriculture As was noted at the beginning of this chapter, agriculture has been an integral part of 17 Currituck's economy. However, like other rural areas across the country, the role of agriculture in Currituck's economy is shrinking. Between 1982 and 1992, the number of farms in Currituck County has decreased by 37% and the amount of land in farms decreased by 23%. Of the farms remaining in Currituck, the average size Increased by 23% (see Table 3F). Table 3E Description _ Agricultural 1982 Summary 1987 Percent Change 1992 (1982199ZJ Number of Farms 143 106 90 -37% Land in Farms (acres) 53,911 47,382 41,760 -23% Average Size of Farm 377 447 464 +23% Farms by Size 1 to 9 acres 9 17 14 +55 % 10 to 49 acres 36 13 14 -61 % 50 to 179 acres 28 21 21 -25% 180 to 499 acres 33 26 17 -48% 500 to 999 acres 22 14 8 -64% 1,000 acres or more 15 15 16 +6% Source: Census of Agriculture Much of the farmland being taken out of production has been converted into residential subdivisions to accommodate growth. Between 1985 and 1990, more than 710 acres of farmland was subdivided for residential development. As the County's population continues to grow, conversion of farmland to residential subdivisions will persist. Among the concerns this trend raises is the loss of prime agricultural farmland. According to Currituck's soil survey, slightly over 6% of the county is designated as prime agricultural farmland (Figure 3G). These soils are among those best suited for septic tank absorption fields; the primary type of sanitary facilities located on the mainland. All totaled, prime agricultural soils represent 28% of the soils best suited for development in the County. Many tools exist to help preserve prime agricultural farmland including land banking, conservation easements, cluster subdivisions, and transfer of development rights. Table 3 G Prime Agricultural Solis - Currltuck County Soil Twe % of Currituck Land Area Altavista fine sandy loam 1.6 Bojac loamy sand 1.4 Munden loamy sand 1.2 State fine loamy sand (0-6% slopes) 2.0 Source: Soil Survey of Currituck County, North Carolina Of the various tools available to preserve farmland, cluster subdivisions holds great promise for Currituck County. The cluster W., concept allows development of land at or slightly above conventional densities for the entire tract, but permits construction to be 1 t clustered into a portion of the property. For instance, instead of having 40 one- acre lots covering an entire tract, it would be permissible to have 40 one-half acre lots covering only half of the tract while leaving the remaining 20 acres perpetually available for farming or open space. This would allow a farmer to receive a return on the land while at the same time preserve the most productive agricultural lands or perhaps important wildlife habitat. Further, clustering will help maintain the rural character of Currituck County by providing permanent open space in the community. Environmental impacts of farming continue to receive a great deal of attention. Concern centers around the runoff of pesticides and fertilizers into surface waters and high erosion rates. The results include sedimentation, nutrient enrichment, and the introduction of toxic substances into surface waters. Currituck County has been fortunate in that local farmers have always shown a deep respect for the land. As a result, agricultural pollution to the sounds and rivers has been minimized. For Instance, many local farms have used forms of conservation tillage, mainly no -till, to stop run- off from cultivated land (plant new crops in between stalks from previous year). Other Best Management Practices (BMP's) that have been used In Currituck County include water control structures, critical area seeding (i.e., along ditches) and waste management systems such as hog lagoons. All of these BMP's reduce sediment delivery which in turn keeps nutrients and pesticides from entering water bodies. With the use of proper farming techniques and Best Management Practices, agricultural pollution of surface waters in Currituck County will be minimized. GOAL 3.2: CONTINUE TO SUPPORT AGRICULTURAL USES IN THOSE AREAS BEST SUITED FOR FARMING AND TO PROMOTE AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES THAT ARE SENSITIVE TO THE ENVIRONMENT. Stratea ies 1. Promote the use of cluster development (Planned Residential Development - PRD, Open Space Subdivisions, Planned Unit Development - PUD) in order to preserve the land best suited for farming; 2. Promote the use of farming Best Management Practices. Extroction Activities As was stated earlier, employment in Currituck County's construction industry grew by 109% between 1984 and 1994. Associated with this increase in growth is an expansion of extraction activities, namely the mining of clay and sand, to support area construction projects. As of January of 1990, there were 23 mining sites in Currituck County listed as active or inactive by the State of North Carolina. While the expansion of extractionactivities has had a positive effect on the local economy, it is important that such activities not have adverse impacts on adjoining properties and Currituck County's environment. Currently, both the state and sounty regulate extraction activities. The county regulates through conditional use permits and the State through a mining permit process administered by the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources. In 1991, Currituck County amended the Unified Development Ordinance by adding a provision that mining operations shall comply with all state standards as well as county standards. By so doing, if a violation of state standards occurs, Currituck officials will be able to respond quickly to address the problem. The state agency responsible for enforcement of mining standards is also responsible for the inspection of dams and administration of state erosion control regulations making timely response to alleged violation difficult. � 19 2/-"- GOAL 3.3: TO CONTINUE TO ALLOW THE EXTRACTION Of MINERALS TO SUPPORT GROWTH PROVIDED EXTRACTION ACTIVITIES HAVE A MINIMUM IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT AND SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. Strate _ ies: 1. Continue to enforce the Unified Development Ordinance in order to limit potential negative impacts mines may have on the environment and surrounding properties (i.e., drainage, erosion, noise, visual impact, etc.). Tourism As was previously mentioned, retail sales in Currituck County has risen significantly over the last ten years. Between 1985 and 1995, retail sales in Currituck County increased by 108%. Much of this increase is related to the growth of the tourism industry in Currituck County. With it's natural amenities and location between the Outer Banks and Hampton Roads Virginia„ the role of tourism in Currituck County's economy is expected to grow. According to the Currituck County Thoroughfare Plan, there were an average of 11,646 vehicles in 1987 traveling along US Highway 158 and NC Highway 168 each day during the summer season. On weekends, peak traffic counts reached over 23,000 vehicles per day. By 1993, summer weekend traffic reached nearly 30,000 vehicles per day on US 158 and NC 168. Most of these vehicles contain out-of-state visitors traveling to the Outer Banks for vacation. If information were made available to these visitors about areas of interest in Currituck County such as the Lighthouse, Old County Jail; and Whalehead Club, the result would be further increases in tourist dollars being spent in Currituck County. Forming partnerships to promote the area Is another method that can be used to increase tourism. Existing organizations such as the Outer Banks Chamber of Commerce, the Corolla Business Association and the Northeastern North Carolina Development Commission can and do provide excellent vehicles to promote tourism. Formation of a Currituck County Chamber of Commerce may also help form local partnerships which could benefit not only the tourism industry, but the business community as a whole. An excellent example of cooperation is a joint effort by several area golf courses and hotels that have put together golf packages to lure tourists dollars into the area. One of the most ambitious tourist attraction projects underway at this time is the creation of the Currituck Wildlife Museum, Currituck County acquired the Whalehead Club, a magnificent gunning club on the Currituck Sound in Corolla, to house the wildlife museum. Acquisition of exhibits has already begun and building preservation efforts are well underway. The museum will provide visitors and residents alike an important glimpse of Currituck County's rich cultural heritage. GOAL 3.4 CONTINUE TO EXPAND THE ROLE TOURISM PLAYS IN CURRITUCK COUNTY. Strateales 1. Continued support of the Currituck Wildlife Museum; 2. Provide information about Currituck County at the existing state rest stop facility south of Coinjock. 3. Promote local and regional cooperation in order to enhance tourism. FM 1 1 1 A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 Commercial and Recreotlonol Fishing and Hunting An important part of the tourism industry in Currituck County is recreational fishing and hunting activities. For decades, people from all over the country have been coming to Currituck County to hunt and fish. Exclusive hunting clubs, such as the Wholehead Club and the Currituck Shooting Club, were constructed on islands and on the Outer Banks. Some local residents continue to earn money today as guides for hunting parties and as caretakers for club properties. While fishing and hunting still remain an important aspect of life in Currituck, long time residents describe how waterfowl and fish populations have been declining over the years. Some of the decline is associated with natural processes while part of it can be attributed to the development of land causing a reduction in water quality and a loss of wildlife habitat. Protection of the county's sounds and adjoining tributaries from pollution is critical to hunting and fishing activities. Increased water turbidity due to construction activity, runoff of agricultural pesticides and fertilizers, and removal of vegetative buffers between development and water bodies are just a few activities that have an adverse impact on wildlife and aquatic species alike. One tool used to protect the natural environment is conservation easements. The purpose of a conservation easement is to establish limits on the development of sensitive lands (i.e., land providing wildlife habitat and land which filters -out pollutants of water prior to reaching the sound). If a conservation easement were to exist, the property owner would relinquish rights to developing that land in return for some monetary relief by way of reduced taxes. An example of how tax relief for a conservation easement would work is provided below (fable 3H). The extent of waterfowl and fish population decline attributable to development is unknown. What is known is that development sensitive to water quality and mindful of wildlife habitat can have a positive effect on maintaining the historical and economic significance hunting and fishing has had in Currituck County. Table 3H Example of Federal Income Tax Deduction For a Gonservation Easement Land value @ highest development potential (current fair market value) $40,000 Less Value after granting conservation easement -36,000 Value of easement 4,000 Yearly adjusted gross income 15,000 30% of yearly income (maximum deduction allowed by IRS) 4,500 Total income tax deduction allowed due to granting of conservation easement $4,000 21 1 GOAL 3.5: MAINTAIN THE ECONOMIC AND HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF COMMERCIAL AND RECREATIONAL FISHING AND HUNTING IN CURRITUCK COUNTY. Strate . ies 1. Improve the quality of the sounds and adjoining tributaries; 2. Encourage the preservation of wildlife habitat by promoting cluster development, 3. Promote conservation easements allowing a landowner to maintain title to the property but prohibit development of sensitive areas in exchange for financial consideration. Commercial Forestry Commercial harvesting of timber is a major activity In eastern North Carolina including Currituck County. Given the vital functions forests serve in coastal areas, such as maintaining high water quality and providing wildlife habitat, it is critical that commercial timber harvesting be done in a responsible manner. The North Carolina Forest Service has established Best Management Practices (BMP's) to ensure commercial foresting activities are sensitive to the environment. These practices include guidelines on such issues as erosion, pesticides, fertilizer applications, shading of water bodies, rehabilitation of sites, and haul road construction. Failure to comply with BMP's could result in the Forest Service assessing substantial fines. In addition to establishing BMP's, the Forest Service implements a program to encourage reforestation of cleared land. Through this program, the Forest Service offers to pay 40% of the costs for reforesting properties that are commercially logged. The federal government is also involved in commercial timber harvesting. When timbered land contains 404 wetlands, the Corps of Engineers is responsible for ensuring logging practices do not conflict with 404 wetland regulations. GOAL 3.6: TO ENSURE COMMERCIAL TIMBER HARVESTING IS DONE IN A MANNER THAT HAS MINIMAL IMPACT TO THE ENVIRONMENT. . Strategies: 1. Commercial timber harvesting shall adhere to best management practices established by the North Carolina Forest Service and comply with 404 wetland regulations. 22 Introduction Currituck County's transportation network is affected by 3 unique features: 1) no incorporated cities within the county, 2) peak traffic during summer months, and 3) physical constraints of the land. State law allows roads to be controlled by one of three entities: 1) North Carolina, 2) incorporated cities, or 3) private control Since Currituck County has no incorporated cities, all streets within the county or either maintained by the state or are under private control. Unlike most areas, Currituck County's peak traffic is, not at 8 AM and 5 PM each weekday. As a tourist destination, Currituck's peak traffic occurs in the summer months, particularly on Saturdays and Sundays. This can be illustrated by traffic counts taken at the Virginia/North Carolina border. Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) in 1990 in this area was 9,900 vehicles per day. However, during a July summer weekend, traffic counts nearly reached 28,000 vehicles per day. Residents often adjust plans to avoid summer traffic jams Physical constraints of Currituck County's geography defines the county's transportation network. Knotts Island is only accessible through Virginia and by ferry to the Currituck County Courthouse. The only access to Gibbs Woods is through Virginia. Currituck County's Outer Banks is accessed through NC 12 in Dare County. The presence of the North Landing River, Currituck and Albemarle Sounds, and various swamps and wetlands limits access on the mainland to a relatively narrow strip oriented in a north south direction. These physical constraints substantially narrow the focus of transportation issues but also limit potential solutions transportation 23 problems. Therefore, it is imperative that Currituck County and North Carolina work together to ensure Currituck's existing transportation network is developed in a way to maximize its functional life span. 1988 Thoroughfare Plan In June of 1988, the North Carolina Department of Transportation completed the Currituck County Thoroughfare Plan. This plan examined existing road systems and analyzed growth trends in the county. Based on data collected, a recommended thoroughfare plan was prepared describing the function roads should serve throughout Currituck (Figure 4.1). Roads in Currituck are classified as follows: MINOR ARTERIALS - links cities, towns, and major resorts and generally serve as interstate travel corridors. Roads in this category include: NC 168 and US 158. MAJOR COLLECTORS - connect populated areas to the arterial system. Roads in this category include: NC 34, NC 615, NC 12 and SR 1140 from US 158 across the proposed mid -sound bridge. MINOR COLLECTORS - provide links for local traffic. Roads in this category include: NC 3, SR 1131, SR 1142, SR 1246, SR 1242, SR 1222, SR 1227, SR 1218, and SR 1147. LOCAL ROADS - provide access to higher classification roads listed above. All roads not listed above are considered local roads. The 1988 Thoroughfare Plan identified the functional life span of 13 bridges in Currituck v s..rr Y \ i I N1 —. M1A 1" •'(� l,, �tt,, + , Figure 4. lilt v! ,.,.,,a.:�y/y/_ µ�j�` e ;,�: - ,; RECOMMENDED THOROUGHFARE PLAN G { ' Al T• 4 ,� Y ; , O � � pp LLQSND ' ' ("I PiinclpnlARainb utsn«o eforosm Interstate o0010 o o ■ �• 1 Other ■NRON 111111 hlnorfvtednb roman •, :_ • ; i ~ o '� �°a; Me orColeclors Reuaumen ,a is w \ MnorColeclors .i Z CURRITUCK COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA {{ � NORTH CUM" WARTMENT OF TMNSPORTATION e ' •��' q. 1 oms,o« a ..eawus-n.w.w •«o nsr..c« w..rn oenur«t«r a nuvaruw ` O rlouM wG«wIn .bwasrUrip« ti C County whose sufficiency ratings were low ' enough to qualify for Federal Bridge Replacement Funds. In addition, the plan recommended 7 different improvements to the road system. These recommendations were based on projected traffic counts and existing capacity of critical streets see Appendix M. Those recommendations and their current status are listed in Figure 4.2. Figure 4.2 1988 THOROUGHFARE PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS 1 NC 168 - widen to 5 lanes (under construction) 2. US 158 from Barco to the Wright Memorial Bridge - widen to 5 lanes (complete) 3. US 158 from Camden to Barco - widen to 4-lane divided (Listed in Transportation Improvement Program) 4. NC 12 from Dare to Corolla - widen to 3 lanes (not in Transportation Improvement Program) 5. Wright Memorial Bridge - widen to 4 lanes (complete) 6. New mid -sound bridge - 4 lanes (listed in Transportation Improvement Program) 7. SR 1242 - widen to 4 lanes (not listed in Transportation Improvement Program). Since 1988, Currituck County has experienced ' significant growth. As a result of this growth, 1 �I 1 Currituck County is now working with NCDOT to update the 1988 Thoroughfare Plan. The new Thoroughfare Plan should be completed in 1997. NCDOT Transportation Improvement Program 1997-2003 In June 1996, NCDOT published the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Published yearly, this plan outlines NCDOT projects planned over the next seven years for roads, bicycles, and airports. Figure 4.3 shows the 1997-2003 TIP improvements for Currituck County. It is important to highlight that the TIP includes airport and bicycle projects. Currituck County's airport has had several improvements in the last five years including installation of a non directional beacon and construction of 9 airplane hangers. As Currituck continues to grow, it is hoped that these and future improvements will be of benefit when recruiting new industry. With respect to bicycles, as a tourist area, Currituck County residents and guests alike could benefit greatly by having road systems that accommodate bicycle traffic. Not only is bicycling one of the most popular recreational activities in the country, but it also provides a viable transportation alternative to motor vehicles. Establishing extra roadway width to accommodate bicycles at the time roads are improved is a cost effective way to provide safe riding areas for cyclists and needed relief of motoring traffic. Figure 4.3. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CURRITUCK COUNTY 1997-2003 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1. Rehabilitate the Wright Memorial Bridge (complete in 1997). 2. Widen US 158 from the Camden County line to the intersection of NC 168 in Barco (identified as a future need). 3. Widen NC 168 to five -lanes from the Virginia State line to the intersection of US 158 in Barco (complete in 1999). 4. Construct a new mid -sound bridge over the Currituck Sound (construction to begin in 2000) 5. Replace the following bridges: Bridge # 7 on NC 615 (construction In 2002); Tulis Creek Bridge (construction in 2000); and Coinjock Bay (under construction). Airport 1. Clean and seal concrete pavement joints, install aircraft parking apron area lighting and security fencing (complete in 2000). 1. Mid -Sound Bridge from mainland to Corolla - construct to accommodate bicycle traffic. 2 NC 12 - bicycle and pedestrian path. 3. NC 168 from Barco to the Virginia State line - widen for bicycles. 4. NC 615 - widen for bicycles. 5. US 158 from Camden to Barco - widen for bicycles. 1 Bicycle/Pedestrian facilities are incidental projects and schedules have not been set at this time. US 158 t NC 168 Highway Corridor Plan Currituck County's 1990 Land Use Plan recognized the significance US 158 and NC 168 would play in the county's future. The 1990 Land Use Plan established the following goal for development along NC 168 and US 158: "Encourage development patterns on Highway 158/168 that will enhance economic development in the county, will be aesthetically pleasing, and will provide for safe and efficient movement of traffic." To accomplish that goal, the Board of Commissioners appointed a 15 member advisory committee established specific recommendations. In May of 1994, the US 158 & NC 168 Highway Corridor Committee presented its recommendation to the Currituck County Board of Commissioners. Since that time, implementation of those recommendations has begun, including adoption of on -premise sign regulations and adoption of driveway regulations for US 158, NC 168, and Tulis Creek Road. In all, the US Highway 158 & NC Highway 168 Corridor Plan contained 78 recommendations ranging from the general (i.e. establish an appearance awards program) to the specific (landscaping at a particular location), One of the most significant features of the plan in terms of long range impacts is specific recommendations for local connector roads and a NC 168 Bypass. As was previously mentioned, physical constraints of the land limit potential solutions to traffic problems. Therefore, it is critical to extend the functional life of existing roads, in particular US 158 from Barco to the Wright Memorial Bridge. Establishing local connector roads will allow local traffic to move in a north south direction without having to utilize and further burden US 158. The Corridor Plan also recommended identifying and protecting a bypass route for NC 168. According to NCDOT officials, under high growth scenario, traffic volumes on the road could reach 65,000 vehicles per day in the year 2016 resulting in a level of service rating of F (heavily congested flow with traffic demand exceeding the capacity of the highway). Rapid growth in this area and the public's desire not to widen NC 168 to a seven - lane highway or greater makes timely identification of a bypass corridor essential. Figure 4.4 shows road extensions recommended in the corridor plan. If the five lane highway of NG 108 and US 158 became too overcrowded in the future, 1396 of the respondents said NG 108 and US 138 should be widen to a seven -lane highway, 5896 said bypass overcrowded roads, and 29% said leave the roads as five -lane highways. 1996 LAND USE PLAN CITIZEN SURVEY A bypass of US 158 was not recommended. This was based on several factors, including: physical constraints of land being too narrow and abundance of wetlands; a bypass would significantly affect existing development in the area, and the location of a mid -sound bridge would help to reduce traffic along a majority of US 158. 1 1 I� 26 1 Another significant recommendation from the corridor plan involves establishing local driveway regulations to promote highway safety. In 1996, the Currituck County Board of Commissioners adopted driveway regulations for NC 168, US 158, and Tulls Creek Road. These standards limit the number and location of driveways, as well as establish criteria for right -turn lanes. NC 168 and US 158 were subject to the new driveway standards based on the significant amount of tourist traffic these roads carry and the location of commercial businesses along the corridor. Tulls Creek Road was included in the driveway standards since it is the primary north/south alternative to NC 168 for local traffic traveling between Currituck to Moyock. As time passes, Currituck County must evaluate the new driveway standards to assess its effectiveness and determine if it should be applicable to other important collector roads in the county. GOAL 4.1: TO HAVE A TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM THAT EFFECTIVELY, EFFICIENTLY AND SAFELY MOVES MOTORING AND BICYCLE TRAFFIC THROUGHOUT CURRITUCK COUNTY. Strate ies: 1. Continue to work with NCDOT in updating the 1988 Thoroughfare Plan and implement recommendations from that plan; 2. Review driveway regulations for effectiveness and determine if they should be extended to include other important collector roads; 3. Request that the Department of Transportation widen the following roads to accommodate bicycle traffic: a) Highway 158 from Belcross (Camden County to Barco), b) Along NC 12 on the Currituck Outer Banks, c) On the Mid -County Bridge, d) NC 615 on Knotts Island, e) Highway 168 from the Virginia state line to Barco, f) Tulls Creek Road (SR 1222); 4. Continue implementing recommendations from the US Highway 158 & NC Highway 168 Corridor Plan Mid-Currituck Sound Bridge One of the most important transportation issues facing Currituck County is the proposed construction of a mid -county bridge. According to the State's TIP program, planning for the bridge will be completed in 1998, design will begin in 1998, right-of-way acquisition will occur from 1998 to 1999, and construction will begin in 2001. The bridge is considered essential for Currituck County based on the need to: 1 Provide safe and timely evacuation of the Currituck Outer Banks, which now contains 8,448 platted and proposed lots within 15 developments. 2. Provide enhanced emergency medical services. Long delays of several hours or more during peak traffic times are common on the Outer Banks, 3. Enhance law enforcement on the Outer Banks. 4. Improve transportation of school age children on the Currituck Outer Banks. Presently these children attend schools in Dare County and face up to four hours of travel time per, day. 5. Provide better access to governmental services, including the Health Department, Inspections, Planning, and Public Works. 6. Enhance revenues of businesses located on the mainland, particularly those related to the building trade. 7. Allow greater accessibility for service workers on the mainland. This would also benefit unemployment rates in some of the counties west of Currituck County. 8. Provide needed relief to US 158 and NC 12 which, by the year 2020 will be operating at a level of service of "F" if the bridge is not built according to NCDOT officials. NC 12 in Southern Shores was already operating at a level of Service "F" in 1995, NCDOT and Its consultants are currently working on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Mid-Currituck Sound Bridge. It is anticipated that this will be completed In 1997 and will include, among other things, the following: build and no build alternatives for the bridge, environmental impacts (noise, air quality, natural systems, hydraulics), and secondary and cumulative impacts. Secondary and cumulative impacts are of particular importance to Currituck County. With careful forethought and appropriate land use controls, secondary and cumulative Impacts of the: mid-Currituck Sound bridge can be minimized. Issue include, among other things: 1. Impact on Outer Banks Development: As was stated above, the Currituck Outer Banks has 8,448 lots platted or approved in 15 developments. All of the land from Corolla south has been approved for development. Most of the land north of Corolla, accessible by 4-wheel drive vehicles only, has been approved for development (3,022 lots). There are several larger parcels with potential for development; however, with a minimum lot size of 120,000 sq. ff. per unit, the number of potential lots is limited. Construction of the bridge will not result in more, dots being approved for development; rather it will likely result in Increasing the speed of development on on lots from Corolla southward that have already been approved. This raises concerns over water supplies, traffic increases, public beach access, strip commercial development, removal of vegetation, and an increase of full-time residents. WATER SUPPLIES: The Southern Outer Banks Water Study indicated there is adequate water supplies in the acquifer to service the southern outer banks provided the acquifer is managed correctly. Currituck County is In the process of identifying management strategies Including the use of reverse osmosis technology to provide water to this area (see chapter on County Facilities) TRAFFIC INCREASES: it is anticipated that with or without a bridge, the traffic level of service for NC 12 will be an "F'- by the year 2020. Therefore, Currituck County, NCDOT, and Outer Banks landowners must work closely to determine how best to address the inevitable traffic problems that lie ahead. Provision of bike paths and avoidance of 5-lanes for NC 12 should be of particular concern. PUBLIC BEACH AND SOUND ACCESS: There is a regional beach access in Pine Island with restroom facilties and 32 parking spaces, 13 beach accesses and 5 parking lots in Whalehead Subdivision, a beach access with 32 parking spaces at the Currituck Lighthouse ocean side, a soundside boardwalk and 32 parking spaces also at the Currituck Lighthouse, and the Whalehead Club with boat slips, 2 sound boardwalks, boating access and over 20 parking spaces. There are also several commercial sound side water related businesses on the Outer Banks, (i.e. sailboard and jet -ski rentals). It, is difficult to assess the number of day trippers expected on the Currituck Outer Banks after the bridge is built; however, it is clear that the County should work to maintain current public beach accesses, improve existing accesses where feasible, and acquire new sound and ocean access points when the opportunity arises. STRIP COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT: County leaders showed great foresight in adopting Planned Unit 29 Development (PUD) regulations which all Outer Banks subdivisions along NC 12 were developed under. As a result, commercial properties within these PUD's are limited to those areas Identified on sketch plans (10% maximum of the total site prior to 1993; 7% maximum after 1993). Strict sign regulations and landscaping standards further limit the negative Impact of commercial development to the unique character of the Currituck Outer Banks. REMOVAL OF VEGETATION: Currituck County adopted Maritime Forest Guidelines as a way to inform developers and homeowners about the importance of maritime forests in stabilizing soils, providing wildlife habitat, protecting freshwater recharge, and providing hurricane protection. Brochures are made available to builders, developers, and homeowners outlining appropriate development within maritime forests and recommendations for rehabilitating existing forests. This Information is particularly important to landowners, many of whom are from different states and are unfamiliar with the many benefits of maritime forests. INCREASE THE NUMBER OF FULL-TIME RESIDENTS: While it can be expected that the percentage of full-time Outer Banks residents will increase as a result of the Mid-Currituck Sound Bridge (11 % as of 1990), It is not anticipated that the number will significantly increase. This is due to the fact the Outer Banks will still be a significant distance from major employment centers and dwelling construction/lot costs are not geared toward year- round family occupancy (52% of the homes built in 1995 were over 5,000 sq. ft. in areaj. There is a potential for more retirement age residents although the lack of easily accessible medical facilities could be a hindrance. 2. Impact on Mainland Development: Construction of a mid -sound bridge will also have consequences for development on the Currituck mainland. Concerns include the speed of development, impact on the character and environment, Impact on communities located in proximity to the bridge, commercial development where US 158 will intersect with the bridge access, and impact on commercial business located south of the mid -sound bridge. SPEED OF DEVELOPMENT: In 1994, Currituck County adopted a provision whereby developments could be turned -down if county facilities are deem inadequate to service the development; i.e. adequate pubic facilities. That standard provides Currituck County an important tool to effectively manage development in a fiscally responsible manner. Vigilant review and adjustments to the adequate public. facilities provision is needed to maintain it's effectiveness. IMPACT ON CHARACTER AND ENVIRONMENT: In 1995, Currituck County increased the minimum lot size In the agricultural zone, comprising approximately 80% of Currituck County's mainland, to one unit per three acres. This lower density zoning will help keep densities down to a level consistent with Currituck's rural character. In addition Currituck adopted common open space subdivisions option that mandates at least 50% of the sites natural resources be permanently protected. Density bonuses are provided to developers choosing the open design standards. Common open space subdivisions standards are an excellent tool to preserve Currituck's rural character and sensitive environmental areas. IMPACT ON COMMUNITIES NEAR BRIDGE: NCDOT estimates the mid - sound bridge could carry up to 25.200 vehicles per peak summer weekend day in the year 2020. The physical location of the bridge, combined with projected traffic levels will impact the community where the mainland landing is located, be It Waterlilly, 30 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Aydlett or Poplar Branch. In order to vpd average summer traffiic) in the minimize impacts, it is recommended year 2020. According to traffic that access be limited from the mid- forecasts, there will be more traffic on sound bridge into local communities US 158 south of the mid -sound bridge which is consistent with all alignment once it is completed than there is now alternatives being considered by without the mid -sound bridge. NCDOT. Further, commercial Therefore, construction of the mid - development where , the bridge sound bridge should not adversely access road intersects with US 158 affect buisnesses on US 158 south of should be of high quality with limited the bridge. In addition, if the bridge is access. Recently adopted driveway not built, NCDOT projects US 158 north standards will be beneficial in this of the Wright Memorial Bridge will be regard. at a level of service "F" during the peak summer season. The consensus IMPACT ON BUSINESSES LOCATED of business owners during the Highway SOUTH OF MID -SOUND BRIDGE: NCDOT Corridor Study was that the traveling anticipates the mid -sound bridge will public does not stop at businesses carry approximately 22% of the when itis in traffic jams. Therefore, average summer daily traffic heading construction of the mid -sound bridge to the beach (12,200 vpd average may help businesses located along summer traffic) and the Wright the southern section of US 158. Memorial Bridge will carry 78% (43,200 GOAL 4.2 TO PROVIDE FOR TIMELY EVACUATION OF RESIDENTS AND GUESTS ON THE CURRITUCK OUTER BANKS DURING MAJOR STORM EVENTS AND IMPROVE THE ACCESSIBILITY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND AVAILABILITY OF COMMUNITY SERVICES. Strategies: 1. Support construction of a mid -county bridge that will have a minimum impact on the Outer Banks and the Currituck County mainland. 2. Work with NCDOT and area residents to determine the best transportation alternetives for traffic on the Outer Banks. GOAL 4.3 TO ENSURE THE CURRITUCK MID -SOUND BRIDGE HAS MINIMUM IMPACT ON THE CURRITUCK OUTER BANKS AND THE CURRITUCK MAINLAND. Strategies: 1. Complete the water study for the Currituck Outer Banks and take the necessary steps to Implement recommendations to ensure adequate water supplies. 2. Maintain and improve existing public beach and sound accesses on the Currituck Outer Banks. Where feasible, acquire new public beach and sound accesses. 3. Continue to enforce PUD regulations limiting commercial development on the Outer Banks, 4. Continue to advise residents, contractors, and developers about the benefits of vegetation on the Outer Banks. 5. Currituck County should continue to enforce the Adequate Public Facilties standard and adjust as needed to maintain it's effectiveness. b. Limit, access from the Currituck Mid -Sound Bridge into local communites on the Currituck Mainland. 31 7. Currituck County should continue to encourage developers to use the common open space development standards to better preserve Currituck's fragile environment and rural character. 8. Currituck County should continue to keep densities low in order to help protect the rural charater of the area. 9. Approve development where the Currituck Mid -Sound Bridge intersects with US 158 that is of high quality Interms of safety and design. 10. Assist in promoting Currituck mainland businesses on the Outer Banks once the mid -sound bridge is complete. North Beaches Of all the transportation issues facing Currituck County, perhaps none is more complex or as controversial than providing access to the North Beaches. Today, improved access is available from Dare County to Corolla. However, north of this improved access are 3,020 platted lots containing 310 residential structures. The only access available to this area is by way of the beach. These lots were platted in the late 1970's in anticipation of a road from Virginia serving the area. However, there is a national wildlife refuge and a state park in this section of Virginia and no access road will be available (access through the refuge and park is limited to a small number of people who have historically used this access and their permits cannot be passed on to others). An interior access road to the north beaches from Corolla is not possible at this time due to the location of several wildlife refuges and an estuarine research reserve (Figure 4.5). Such an access road would be contrary to the purposes these programs serve. The lack of an improved north beach access poses obvious problems to the county and residents of the area. These problems include timely evacuation during storms, the provision of basic County services such as solid waste pick-up, schooling, emergency services, and increased traffic along recreational beaches. However, environmental concerns of providing a north beach access cannot be overstated. Careful thought and analysis must be done on this sensitive issue to best serve the needs of all concerned. GOAL 4.4: TO PROVIDE A SAFE MEANS OF ACCESS NORTH OF COROLLA THAT WILL HAVE A NEGLIGIBLE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Strate ies: 1. Continue to monitor development on the Currituck Beaches north of Corolla and explore the potential for improving access to the area. Related to the Issue of beach access is the road vehicle traffic has increased to a point use of off -road vehicles. With increased where public safety has the potential of being , construction on the Outer Banks and the compromised. growing popularity of the north beaches, off - GOAL 4.5: TO ALLOW THE USE OF OFF -ROAD VEHICLES IN A SAFE AND RESPONSIBLE MANNER ON THE CURRITUCK OUTER BANKS. Strategies: 1. Continue to enforce the existing Outer Banks Vehicular and Barrier Strand Ordinance. 32 1 1 1 Figure y.s Curritu ck Outer Bps M ajor Land DeveRcIpme nt Areas and Nature Reservations A, r- �Y y cl� �swo c% p �d c n — 1 NATURE CONSERVANCY a " 2 a WA OFOUA OCEAN HILL VILLAGES AT o OCEAN HILL canim 1 SHIPS WATCH OCEAN SANDS O ' � P OENM 0 c tTj `` ipAwr io 0 J `� �\ BACK BAY NW.R. FALSE CAPE STATE PARK CAROVA BEACH N. SWAN BEACH MISC. PVT. OWNERSHIP CURRITUCK NAT'L WILDLIFE REFUGE SWAN BEACH SEAGULL MISC. PVT. OWNERSHIP OCEAN BEACH CURRITUCK BANKS NAT'L WILDLIFE REFUGE CURRITUCK BANKS NATI_ ESTUARINE RESEARCH RESERVE COROLLA VILLAGE I COROLLA LIGHT WHALEHEAD / MONTERAY SHORES SPINDRIFT CURRITUCK / PINE ISLAND SHOOTING CLUBS NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY PINE ISLAND SANCTUARY PINE ISLAND Develooement Activity added to the January 1990 figure, residential development occupies 6,790 acres or 81% of Although the number of jobs created in Currituck County's developed land at then end Currituck County is growing faster than the of 1995. ' population rate (see Chapter on Economy), the vast majority of land developed in the Since 1990, the percentage of land developed county is for residential uses. In fact, the for commercial purposes has dropped by 1% percentage of land developed for residential (from 7% to 6%). The percentage of land purposes versus non-residential purposes has developed for recreational purposes and increased between 1990 and 1995 (fable 5A). industrial purposes has remained the same between 1990 and 1995 (4 % and 1 % As of January 1990, residential development respectively). Govenrment, utilities and occupied 4,875 acres or 78% of the institutional land uses occupy only 8% of the developed land: in Currituck County: Between developed land in Currituck County as of 1995 1990 and 1995 alone, an additional 1,915 acres versus 10% in 1990. Figure 5.1 shows existing of land was developed for residential land use in the county as of December, 1995. purposes accounting for 86% of the land developed between that time period. When Table 5A Developed Land Currituck County, 1.g95 Acres Acres Acres To 1995 No Land Use To 1990 (/0) 1990-1995(%) Total (%) Residential 4,875(78) 1,915 (86) ' 6,790 (81) Commercial 409 (7) 126 (6) 535 (6) Industrial 54 (1) 2 (>1) 56 (1) Recreational 237 (4) 123 (6) 360 (4) Gvmmt./Util./Inst. 638(10) 61 (D 699_ (� Total 6,213 (100) 2227 (100) 8,440 (100) The Poplar Branch -Outer Banks area had the Moyock-Mainland had approximately 100 lots highest number of lots approved for approved for development during that same development between 1991 and 1995 (400) by time period. Moyock-Gibbs Woods, Fruitville- a four -to -one margin over the next highest Knotts Island, and Fruitville-Outer Banks had sub -township (Table 5B). The areas of the fewest number of lots approved for Crawford, Poplar Branch -Mainland, and development. When compared with Table 34 9vRc 5. i y N • u P 0 • : • inn � 6 ->s .- LAND USE MAP (EXISTING LAND USE) LEGEND a4 Residential/Recreational f• -01 ) • .X•� yo ', , • \ e • Commerical . ••': � Industrial r Governmental q ' 5C, it is clear that the number of lots created by sub -township is far below the number of residential, dwellings: constructed in each Table 56 area. This reflects the large number of subdivision lots previously approved in each of these areas. Subdivision Lots Approved 1991-1995 Location/Year 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 TOTAL Fruitville-Knotts Island 0 0 1 4 4 9 Fruitville-Outer Banks 0 8 0 0 0 8 Moyock-Mainland 22 37 14 9 1 93 Moyock-Gibbs Woods 0 14 0 0 0 14 Crawford 0 78 5 18 0 101 Pop. Branch -Mainland 0 29 16 19 32 96 Pop. Branch -Outer Banks 42 75 82 96 105 400 TOTAL 64 241 118 146 142 721 Residential Land Use Between 1991 and 1994, there was a steady increase in the total number of residential Figure 5.2 charts the total number of residential building permits issued topping -out in 1994 with building permits issued by year from 1985 to 482 residential permits. The number of building 1995. This table also graphically illustrates the permits issued in 1995 decreased to the 1992 breakdown of permits by sub -township for residential permit level with 396 permits being each of those years. issued. A majority of the decrease can be attributed to fewer homes being built in the Poplar Branch -Outer Banks area (247 permits in 1994 versus 182 permits in 1995). y 500 E 4) 450 a 400 350 c 300 ul 250 200 ° 150 100 50 Z 0 Residential Permits: 1985 To 1995 - 1A -( n co 0) O ,- - N M. V N co oD co co 03 0 0) o) 0) o) o) 01 0) - O) a) 0) 0) O) 0) O) Q 03. V a" A Poplar Branch -Outer Banks Poplar Branch -Mainland Fruitville-Outer Banks Fruitville-Knotts Island Crawford ❑ Moyock-Gibbs Woods i>• Moyock-Mainland In terms of number of residential dwelling 1995, Poplar Branch Township was by far the permits issued by township between 1985 and fastest growing section of Currituck County with 36 1,580 units. Table 5C .lists the number of Table 5C Totol Residential Units Built 1985-1995 POPLAR BRANCH -OUTER BANKS 1,580 MOYOCK-MAINLAND 616 POPLAR BRANCH -MAINLAND 545 CRAWFORD 463 FRUITVILLE-KNOTTS ISLAND 156 FRUITVILLE-OUTER BANKS 128 MOYOCK-GIBBS WOODS 37 TOTAL RESIDENTIAL PERMITS 3,525 It by su In order to more accurately determine future residential land area needs, the average per dwelling lot size was determined by sub - Table 5D AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL LOT SIZE 1900-1005 (Square Feet) POPLAR BRANCH -MAINLAND: 98,355 SF MOYOCK-GIBBS WOODS 82764 SF CRAWFORD 81,525 SF MOYOCK-MAINLAND 77,638 SF FRUITVILLE-KNOTTS ISLAND 54,450 SF FRUITVILLE-OUTER BANKS 23,854 SF POPLAR BRANCH -OUTER BANKS 17,281 SF While the Poplar Branch -Outer Banks (PB-OB) had the greatest number of residential building permits Issued, Moyock-Mainland (M-ML) had the most land area used for residential development between 1990 and 1995 at 565 acres (Figure 5.3). Poplar Branch - Mainland (PB-ML) had the next highest amount of land developed for residential purposes (499 acres), followed by Crawford (C) at 408 acres, Poplar Branch -Outer Banks (PB-OB) at291 acres, Fruitville-Knotts Island (F- KI) at 90 acres, Moyock-Gibbs Woods (M- GW) at 38 acres and Fruitville-Outer Banks (F- OB) at 23 acres. township between 1990 and 1995. The results from largest average lot size to smallest average lot size is shown in Table 5D. The average residential lot size in Poplar Branch -Mainland between 1990 and 1995 was just over 2 acres. Lots sizes in Moyock-Gibbs Woods, Crawford and Moyock-Mainland averaged just under 2 acres in size during that some time period. The large lot sizes reflect the construction of single-family dwellings on lots of 3-10 acres which substantially raises the averge lot size in these areas. Knotts Island's average residential lot size between 1990 and 1995 was 54,450 sq. ft. which is relatively close to the minimum 40,000 sq. ft, I � i 1 lot size predominate in Knotts Island. A majority of land within Fruitville-Outer Banks was platted in the 1970's when the minimum size was 20,000 sq. ft. thereby accounting for an average lot size of 23,854 sq. ft.. The average lot size in Poplar Branch -Outer Banks was 17,281 sq. ft. In area even though the minimum lot size for Planned Unit Developments, which occupy most of the area, is 10,000 sq. ft.. This larger lot size reflects the trend on the Outer Banks of building larger homes that are rented by more than one family. In terms of total number of residential major subdivsion lots approved that do not have dwellings on them, Poplar Branch -Outer Banks (PB-OB) has the highest number with 3,623, followed by Fruitville-Outer Banks (F-OB) with 2723, Poplar Branch -Mainland (PB-ML) with 1,647, Moyock-Mainland (M-M) with 850, Crawford (C) wth 523, Moyock-Gibbs Woods (M-GW) with 82 and Fruitville-Knotts Island (F- KI) with 67. It is important to note that approved major subdivision lots does not mean all Improvements have been installed and the lot is ready for development; it simply means the county has given at least initial approval for the development to procede thorough the subdivsion process (Figure 5.4). Figure 5.4 Approved Major Subdivision Lots & Dwellings Constructed: July 1996 6000-10 L 5000 d ,a E 4000 Z ❑ Approved Lots 3 0 0 0 c 2000 El Existing Dwellings 1000 0 M-M M-GW C PB-M PB-OB F-KI F-OB Residential Housina Stoc A detailed housing survey was conducted in 1990. Part of the survey included a visual identification of the housing stock condition. Houses were listed as . standard (good condition), substandard (livable condition but in need of some repairs) and dilapidated (unlivable condition). Table 5E shows the results of that survey. 01i Affordable Housing As a coastal community, Currituck County has experienced a tremendous increase in land values and housing prices. Today, lots 30,000 to 40,000 square feet in area without water access typically sell for between $20,000 to $27,000. In 1980, the average construction price ` of housing in Currituck County was $35,420; whereas, in .1995 the average construction price by sub -township can be founnd in Table 5F. Table 5E Housing Survey of Gurrituck County, April 1000 Number of % of Total Housing Condition (%) Houses Tme Housing Units Housing Std. Sub Std. Dilp. Single -Family 4,774 65.2 90 7 3 Double -wide Mobile Home 706 9.6 86 14 <1 Single -wide Mobile Home 1,646 22.5 61 34 5 Apartments/ Townhornes 27 1 Totals 7,327 100.0% 83% 14% 3 % Table 5F Average Housing Cost of New Single -Family Dwelling: 10.95 Moyock-Mainland: $90,517 Moyock-Gibbs Woods: $68,434 Poplar Branch -Mainland: $85,546 Poplar Branch -Outer Banks $264,561 Crawford $86,081 Fruiville-Knotts Island $85,890 Fruitville-Outer Banks $143,441 Given land and construction costs of today, finding affordable housing is becoming more difficult for the average family. Multi-family/townhouse development is one housing alternative that is often more affordable than conventionally built single- family dwellings. As of 1990, apartments and townhouse development represented only 2.7% of the housing stock in Currituck County. Another affordable housing alternative to conventionally built single-family dwellings is mobile homes. Currituck County permits double -wide mobile homes meeting certain appearance criteria (i.e., masonry foundation, roof pitch, etc.) in all residential zoning districts. Class "B" mobile homes (built after July 1, 1976) are permitted in existing mobile home parks, on large lots in limited 39 circumstances, and for temporary replacement of a condemned home. Class "C" mobile homes (built before July 1, 1976) are no longer permitted in Currituck County. Planned Unit Development (PUD's), Planned Residential Development (PRD's), and Open Space Subdivision regulations provide additional tools that can be used to help reduce the cost of housing. There are two ways that housing costs can be lowered. First, Planned Unit Developments and Planned Residential Developments _ allow higher densities (three units per acre) than do conventional subdivisions (approximately one unit per acre) thereby reducing land costs. In addition, PUD's, PRD's, and Open Space Subdivisions allow dwellings to locate on smaller lots that help reduce infrastructure costs (shorter roads, shorter water lines, less lighting, etc.). These savings can in turn be passed along to homeowners. In order to encourage the private sector to provide affrodable housing, some communities offer density bonus incentives for developers if a certain percentage of homes within a development are set -aside for low or moderate income families. This is commonly referred to as Inclusionary zoning. One of the advantages of such a policy is that affordable housing units can be spread throughout the subdivision as opposed to being concentrated In pockets. A 1 1 GOAL 5.1: ENCOURAGE THE DEVELOPMENT OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN A MANNER THAT MINIMIZES THE IMAPCT ON SURROUNDING AREAS. IStrateaies: 1. Continue the present mobile home policy of allowing double-wides meeting specific appearance criteria by right in all residential zoning districts; allowing Class "B" mobile homes (built after July 1, 1976) in existing mobile home parks and on large lots in limited circumstances and for temporary replacement of a condemned home; and prohibiting class "C" mobile homes (built before July 1, 1976); 2. Continue to promote Planned Unit Developments (PUD's), Planned Residential Developments (PRD's) and Open Space Subdivisions. 3. Explore the need to provide affordable housing in Currituck County and, if needed, identifiy incentives to help encourage the private sector to provide such housing. 4. Carefully evaluate the impact of existing and proposed development standards (i.e. Adequate Public Facilties regulations, Impact Fees) on providing affordable housing. An important part of providing affordable housing to the community is the revitalization of existing neighborhoods that are in a state of decline. By providing funds and technical assistance, many homes identified as substandard in the Land Use Survey could be upgraded to standard condition. The County was previously involved in providing needed infrastructure (water/sewer) improvements in the Newtown neighborhood of Moyock Township. Currently the county is working with the Albermarle Commission in upgrading substandard housing throught the Scattered Site Housing Rehablilitation Program. GOAL 5.2: TO CONTINUE TO REVITALIZE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS IN ORDER TO PROVIDE SAFE AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR THE RESIDENTS OF CURRITUCK COUNTY. Strate _ ies: 1. Continue particiaption in programs to help rehabilitate substandard housing in Currituck County. Table 5G ESTIMATED ACRES TO BE DEVELOPED: 1996-2005 I. ndlbe AcresNeeded Residential 3,736 Commercial . 276 Industrial 46 Recreational 185 Gvernment/ Utilities 369 Total 4,612 40 Future Land Use Needs To determine future land use needs, the average residential lot size by sub -township was multiplied by the estimated number of dwellings to be constucted by sub -township between 1996 and 2005. Further, it was assumed that the current ratio of residential land area to nonresidential land area will remain constant (Table 5G). The Currituck County Soil Survey was referred to to obtain a conservative estimate of how much developable land is available assuming on -site septic systems are utilized (the only method of sewage disposal used except in PUD's on the Outer Banks and mobile home parks on the mainland). According to the survey, of the 174,720 acres in Currituck County, 22% or 38,438 acres is listed as being suitable to provisionally suitable for on -site septic systems. Assuming all 8,440 acres of developed land in the County is on suitable to provisionally suitable soils (see Table 5A), 29,998 acres of soil capable of accepting on -site septic systems is available for future development as of December, 1995. For the ten year planning period, it is estimated that an additional 4,612 acres of land will be needed. Therefore, there is ample developable land to accommodate growth anticipated by the year 2005 (note: figures provided are conservative based on the following: not all developed land is on suitable to provisionally suitable soils; some areas listed as unsuitable for septic systems may be deemed provisionally suitable based on an on -site evaluation; it is possible to build on land unsuitable for septic systems and pump sewerage to soils that are suitable - i.e., using low pressure pipe systems or sewage treatment plants). Deslgn Principles While preparing the land use plan, citizens voiced support for growth in the county provided such growth did not detract from the quality of life residents now enjoy. In keeping with that concern, Currituck County recognizes development can be of high quality and thereby be an asset to the community if certain design principles are followed. Below is a list of design principals, which if followed, would promote higher quality development in Currituck County. avoid development in critical areas such as wetlands, significant dunes, important wildlife habitat, flood prone areas, etc. take appropriate measures to minimize storm water run-off build roads which follow existing topography - provide adequate setbacks from the ocean, sound, and other water bodies - use the site's natural amenities such as views, vegetation, water access, and topography for the benefit of the maximum number of residents be sensitive to historical and scientifically important areas - avoid development that will negatively Impact the quantity or quality of potable water supplies - establish functional recreation areas such as ball fields, boat launches, and walking trails; avoid designating only land unsuitable for development for recreation and small noncontiguous open space areas; place high nuisance recreation areas away from residential units - avoid building on soils that are unsuitable for septic systems or that cannot adequately support buildings where sewage is pumped to good soils - limit the amount of impermeable surfaces in close proximity to water bodies to avoid excessive run-off and potential pollution sources - preserve exiting vegetation to the maximum extent possible (for visual enhancement, wildlife habitat, noise buffers, soil stabilization, watershed protection, moderate climate, etc.) - develop land that is sensitive and compatible with surrounding uses (i.e., limit noise, limit impact of lighting, soften the visual impact, etc.) - promote development that will not detract from the visual appearance of the county - minimize the driveway cuts along state maintained. roads to enhance traffic safety - provide good circulation patterns that separate roads and people to the maximum extent possible and that promote the creation of neighborhood units; limit through traffic in residential areas - construct roads that meet anticipated needs; avoid over -design of streets; connect with surrounding properties where appropriate - promote the placement of utilities underground for visual enhancement; 41 1 1 1 1 1 buffer those utilities. that are above ground (I.e., power stations, transmission towers, etc.) - minimize damage to the site while under construction (Le., protect vegetation, prevent erosion) - encourage internal circulation for developments; discourage the location of residential dwellings along access streets which reduce the capacity of the roads and provide less desirable lots Water Related Uses Given Currituck County's geographical location, establishment of goals associated with water -related use Is particularly important. Below 'are goals and related strategies associated with water uses. FLOATING HOME DEVELOPMENT GOAL 5.3: TO PROHIBIT THE ESTABLISHMENT OF FLOATING HOME DEVELOPMENT Strategies: 1. Maintain provisions in the Unified Development Ordinance that prohibit the use of floating home development. MARINA DEVELOPMENT GOAL 5.4: TO PERMIT MARINA DEVELOPMENT (INCLUDING MARINAS ASSOCIATED WITH RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS) ONLY WHEN IT CAN CLEARLY BE SHOWN THAT THE MARINA HAS NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON THE PUBLIC TRUST WATERS, ESTUARINE AREAS ,AND SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. Strategies: 1. Enforce the Unified Development Ordinance permitting marinas subject to the following design principles: a) Marinas shall be planned in such a manner as to minimize the risk of water pollution. b) Marinas shall be located in areas where there is a high rate of water "turnover" (the time required for tidal action or water flow to replace water of a boat basin with new water from another source). Ideally, marinas should have a water turnover rate of 2 to 4 days. c) Marinas in upland areas shall be encouraged. d) Marina access channels shall be designed to maximize circulation and avoid dead-end spots. e) Marina designs must incorporate facilities for the proper handling of sewage, waste, and refuse. f) Marinas shall minimize alteration of existing shoreline configurations and disturbance of vital habitat areas. g) Dredging operations shall not occur during critical periods of fish migration and breeding. h) The method of dredging shall be chosen that will have the least environmental impact and, all dredged materials shall be placed in a manner so as not to pollute surrounding areas. i) Proposals for marina development shall be accompanied by a modeling study Indicating expected flushing. 42 2. Permit marinas as an accessory use to residential development. Marinas not associated with residential developments and dry stack storage facilities shall only be permitted in accordance with the Unified Development Ordinance. ISLAND DEVELOPMENT GOAL 5.5: TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF ISLANDS THAT WOULD BEST PROMOTE THE PUBLIC INTERESTS. Strate ies: 1. Allow island development that complies with the county's zoning regulations; 2. Permit the development of Monkey Island for the purpose of public education or research and related purposes. BULKHEADS GOAL 5.6: TO PERMIT THE USE OF BULKHEADS FOR STABILIZING NON -OCEAN SHORELINES. Strate ies: 1. Require all bulkhead installations be done according to CAMA regulations. Energy Focllity Siting It Development As was stated in Chapter 3, Economy, the county desires to build on its tourism industry. It is felt that any proposed offshore drilling activities off North Carolina's coast, including exploration, would be contrary to this goal. The county is opposed to any such activities. In addition, Currituck is opposed to locating any support or processing facilities associated with offshore drilling within the county. Any energy generating plant shall be located in accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance. GOAL 5.7 TO PROTECT THE FRAGILE COASTAL ENVIRONMENT FROM NEGATIVE IMPACTS OF ENERGY FACILITIES. Strategies: 1. Oppose all drilling off the coast of North Carolina and oppose the location of any associated support or processing facilities within Currituck County. 2. Allow energy generating plants in accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance as long as it is consistent with environmental protection, health, and welfare of the community. 43 ' r" ) 1 1 FEATURES Introduction Between 1970 and 1995, Currituck County's population has grown from 6,976 to 16,404, an increase of 135% in 25 years. Construction associated with that growth has raised public concern over the impacts development has on the quality of life in Currituck, as was evident from the public comments received during the preparation a of the 1996 Land Use Plan (Appendix A). In fact, when asked in a mail - out survey which of 19 actions would have the greatest effect on Currituck County's quality of life, two of the top five answers were related to the environment (Table 6A). Table 6A Mail -Out Survey. Top 5 Actions to Improve the Quality of Life in Gurrituck . Gounty 1. Protect water quality of sounds and rivers (95%). 2. Protect residential property from negative impacts (88%). 3. Protect the environment (88%). 4. New development pay impact on county services (86%). 5. Improve highway safety (81 %). However, development need not be detrimental to the environment and cultural features. Responsible construction can occur that minimizes the impact on Currituck County's resources. This chapter recognizes the positive effects growth has in Currituck County and recommends actions to continue p, growth in a manner that is sensitive to the environment and cultural features. urface Water The Currituck and Albemarle Sounds are critical to the well being of Currituck County and Northeastern North Carolina. As was stated above, 95% of the residents surveyed indicated that protection of the sounds and rivers was the most important issue in the county's quality of life. The Currituck Sound is particularly vulnerable to outside influences because of it being a near freshwater environment/near saltwater environment, it's dependence on wind tides, and shallowness estimated to be approximately five feet. Development can effect the quality of surface water in many ways. Rainwater run-off from streets and parking lots carry pollutants into surrounding waters. Man-made solutions to minimize flooding could adversely affect the natural processes of the sounds and rivers. Liquid waste from underground septic systems could seep into rivers or sounds and discharge from certain land uses into waterbodies may alter fragile balances of nature needed to support fish and vegetation. However, with proper planning and education, the Impact of development on surface waters can be minimized. Currltuck So un d Salinity The Currituck Sound is approximately 153 square miles in area and has historically shifted from a near freshwater environment to a near saline environment. Increases in salinity 1 levels have historically occurred due to inlet formation and ocean overwash. The Currituck Sound has been a freshwater body since the closing of the last inlet in the early 1800's. A majority of the Currituck Sound's fresh water is from the North Landing and Northwest Rivers. Although classified as a fresh water body since the early 1880's, salinity levels have fluctuated since that time. Below normal rainfall in the mid -to -late 1980's contributed to Increases in salinity levels severely affecting aquatic vegetation and the fish population, particularly the largemouth black bass. While normal rainfalls in the late 1980's and early 1990's have begun to stabilize salinity levels, measurements of salinity taken at 5 different sites over the last 7 years have shown salinities exceeded maximum concentrations (3.2 to 3.8 parts per thousand) at which largemouth bass can successfully reproduce Coastal Fisheries Investigations, 1996). Table 6B identifies sources affecting salinity levels of the Currituck Sound. Table 6B Sources Affecting Salinity Levels in the Gurrituck Sound 1. Ocean overwash (particularly at Sandbridge). 2. Evaporation during droughts leaves salt behind. 3. Intrusion through Coinjock Canal. 4. Intrusion from Albemarle Sound at lower end of Currituck. 5. North Landing River through West Neck Creek/Canal #2 6. Diversion of freshwater supply from the North River (i.e. Chesapeake water withdrawals, farmland drainage alteration). Stable salinity levels in the Currituck Sound would be beneficial for both the aquatic vegetation and the fish population. However, salinity levels in the Currituck Sound will always 45 fluctuate due to natural and man-made occurrences. While nothing can be done to alter natural occurrences, limiting the effects of man-made fluctuations would be in the best interest of the county. In order to have a better understanding of influences affecting the sounds, particularly those created by man, Currituck County should continue to participate In water quality and quantity monitoring programs. Drainage The Currituck and Albemarle Sounds are located within the Pasquotank River drainage basin which includes parts of southeastern Virginia. Figure 6.1 shows the watershed boundaries within the county. Waters reach the sounds from these watershed areas as well as from urbanized areas of southeastern Virginia through the Northwest and North Landing Rivers, Back Bay, and numerous farm drainage ditches. This being the case, it is important that any efforts to maintain and Improve water quality Involve all communities within the drainage basin area, including those in Virginia. Preparation of a river basin plan could potentially have important long range Implications on the water quality of the Currituck and Albemarle Sounds. North Carolina, through the NC Division of Water Quality, Is currently in the process of preparing the Pasquotank River Basin Plan. The Pasquotank River Basin Plan will seek to accomplish the following goals: - protect water quality of all basins - provide information about water quality - coordinate local, state and federal efforts to restore/protect waters make recommendations to protect water quality - chart the progress of water quality in the basin In order to maximize the benefits of the basin plan, it is essential that Currituck County actively participate in its preparation. 1 1 1 1 1 1 r A 1 1 Watersheds and Stream Classifications Virginia Water Use C/assiAcctions The State of North Carolina classifies bodies of water by its uses. In Currituck County, the following water use classifications exist: Class SC - a salt water classification where ' the best uses are listed as aquatic life propagation and secondary recreation, 46 r V C- NO "�!ARVISBLRG':. ) �- POWELLS POINT i r HARBINGER AIAWM E DARE SYX1iD i Co. fOM HARBOR including recreational fishing, boating; and water related activities. Waters listed in SC include the North Landing River, the North River and.the Currituck Sound. Class SB - a salt water classification where the best use is swimming, which occurs frequently or on an organized basis and uses listed in the SC class (above). The Albemarle Sound is listed as SB. Class C a freshwater classification where the best use Is secondary recreation, fishing, wildlife, and fish and aquatic life propagation. Class C waters include the North West River and Tulls Bay. Class B - a freshwater classification where the best use is for primary recreation and other uses suitable for Class C. Primary recreation includes, swimming, skin diving, water skiing, and similar uses involving human body contact. Tulls Creek is listed as Class B. Primary Nursery Areas a supplemental classification, primary nursery areas are growing areas for populations of juvenile finfish and shellfish of economic Importance. Areas designated as primary nursery areas include Deep Creek - 158 acres on eastern side of North River south of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, Lutz Creek - 154 acres on eastern side of North River west of Bertha, and Tulls Bay - 2,522 acres on west side of Currituck Sound at the mouth of the Northwest River including the Northwest River and its tributaries located within North Carolina. GOAL 6.1: TO MAINTAIN AND IMPROVE THE WATER QUALITY IN THE CURB/TUCK AND ALBEMARLE SOUNDS. Strateaies: 1. Continue participation in state and federal water quality and quantity testing programs to gain a better understanding of influences affecting surface water bodies. 2. Soil Conservation Service should continue to address water quality issues and if necessary, begin a water quality testing program. 3. Review results from the Pasquotank River Basin Plan and implement suggested environmental management strategies for improving and maintaining the quality of the Currituck and Albemarle Sounds and associated tributaries where appropriate. 4. Develop communication channels with southeastern Virginia communities in order to inform ahem of the status, concerns and programs being undertaken relating to the water quality of the Currituck Sound. Areas of Environmental Concern The Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) establishes protection measures for certain areas by designating them as Areas of Environmental Concern (AEC's). In Currituck County there are two categories of AEC's. These are the estuarine system made up of estuarine waters estuarine shorelines, public trust waters, and coastal wetlands (Figure 6.2), and ocean hazard areas consisting of ocean erodible areas and high hazard flood areas 47 I 1 .1 Figure 6.2 Estuarine System Estuarine Waters T! mi: " Estuarine Shoreline V. " Coastal Wetlands 75' Coastal Fishing Waters Public Trust Waters Inland Fishing Waters Below is a discussion of where these AEC's are located and recommendations for the `appropriate type of land use for these areas. Estuarine system Estuarine Waters and Estuarine Shorelines Estuarine waters include "all the waters of the Atlantic Ocean within the boundary of North Carolina and all the waters of the bays, sounds, rivers, and tributaries seaward of the dividing, line between coastal fishing waters and inland fishing waters, as set forth in an agreement adopted by the Wildlife Resources Commission and the Department of Natural Resources and Community Development" (now called the Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources). The estuarine water system's productivity depends on the water circulation that is subject to tidal flows, mixture of saltwater and freshwater flows, and water depth. Circulation of estuarine waters helps cleanse pollutants, affects salinity, moves sediment, spreads fish and shellfish, and transports nutrients and plankton. Estuarine shorelines include all land that is 75 feet landward of the mean high water level, or normal water level, of estuarine waters. While these areas generally remain dry, they are critical to the estuarine system. If improperly developed, degradation of the estuarine waters and coastal wet/ands would result. These areas are also subject to erosion and periodic flooding. In Currituck County, estuarine waters and estuarine shorelines include the Currituck/Albemarle Sounds, adjacent bays, and the lower reaches of the North and Northwest Rivers. Appropriate development for estuarine waters includes low impact recreational uses that do not interfere with the vital functions of estuarine waters such as raised walkways, docks, bulkheads, boathouses, etc., and other uses that comply with CAMA regulations and are in keeping with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance. Appropriate development for estuarine shorelines includes those uses listed as being permitted in the Unified Development Ordinance and that comply with CAMA regulations. Compliance with CAMA, Health Department, and Unified 1 Cf:3 Development Ordinance setback regulations for structures and septic systems shall be adhered to provide appropriate protection for the estuarine system. GOAL 6.2: TO MAINTAIN THE HIGH QUALITY OF ESTUARINE WATERS AND TO PROMOTE APPROPRIATE DEVELOPMENT ALONG ESTUARINE SHORELINES $O AS NOT TO DEGRADE THE ESTUARINE SYSTEM. Public Trust Waters Public Trust Waters include waters and submerged lands in the coastal region where the public has rights of use and/or ownership, including the rights of navigation and recreation. These areas overlap with the estuarine waters AEC, 'but they also include inland fishing waters that are not estuarine waters AEC's. In Currituck County public trust waters Include all estuarine waters upper reaches of the North and Northwest rivers, a number of small creeks (i.e., Tulls Creek, Landing Creek) and the Atlantic Ocean. Appropriate development in public trust waters includes limited recreational uses such as docks and piers and other uses permitted by CAMA regulations that comply with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance. GOAL: 6.3 KEEP ALL PUBLIC TRUST WATERS OPEN FOR NA VIGAT/ON INCLUDING THOSE AREAS UNDER THEJURISDICTION OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. Coastal Wet/ands Coastal wetlands are defined as any salt marsh or other marsh subject to regular or occasional flooding by the tides (including wind tides). This category does not include freshwater swamps or inland wetlands that are discussed elsewhere in the chapter. These areas are critical to the well being of the coastal system. Coastal wetlands act as filters that remove sediments that are harmful to marine life. Vegetation within coastal wetlands has a stabilizing effect that helps reduce erosion and turbidity. Further, coastal wetlands serve as important nursery areas and habitats for fish and shellfish as well as habitats for other wildlife and waterfowl. Within Currituck County, coastal wetlands can be found in the Currituck Sound, the North River and along the western section of the Outer Banks. Significant amounts of coastal wetlands are located on the west side of Mackey Island, between Churches Island and the Intracoastal Waterway, the Northwest River at Tulis Bay and along the North River on the western side of Currituck's mainland. Appropriate development for coastal wetlands includes low impact recreational and utility uses that do not interfere with the vital functions of wetlands such as raised walkways and common open space and uses that comply with CAMA regulations and the Unified Development Ordinance. GOAL 6.4: TO PROTECT COASTAL WETLANDS SO THAT THEY CAN CONTINUE TO SERVE THEIR VITAL FUNChION IN THE EN VIT ONMENT. 49 Ocean Hazard Areas additional distance where significant erosion can be expected during a major storm. Ocean Erodible Arecs Virtually all of Currituck County's oceanfront coastline is located within the ocean erodible Ocean erodible areas cover the beaches area. and lands adjacent to the ocean that have a substantial possibility of long term erosion and Appropriate development in the ocean significant shoreline changes. Its boundaries hazard areas shall be that which conforms to are defined as containing an area 60 times the the Unified Development Ordinance and long-term average annual erosion rate for a CAMA regulations. particular stretch of shoreline, plus an High Hazard Flo odAreas with associated goals and strategies where appropriate. High hazard flood areas cover land subject to flooding, wave action, and high velocity wind Swamps currents during a major storm and are _ identified as Zones V 1 to V30 on the flood Currituck County has three large swamps and insurance rate maps prepared by the Federal several smaller ones located within its Insurance ` Administration. Currituck County boundaries. The large swamps include the participates in the National Flood Insurance Dismal Swamp in the northeast section of the Program that is administered through the county, the 'Great Swamp near the Maple Planning and Inspections Department. Airport and the Maple Swamp between Other Fraglle Areas Aydlett and Grandy. These swamps contain extensive forest areas Currituck County has several environmentally and provide needed habitat for wildlife, fragile areas in addition to Areas of including black bears. They also serve as Environmental Concern (AEC's) within its important components of the county's jurisdiction. These include swamps, petrified hydrology. Swamp areas have faced little and maritime forests, significant dunes and development pressures, although logging shorelines.- Below is a brief summary of each and alteration of drainage patterns could pose threats in the future and should be monitored. 1 � ,o 1 Maritime Forests The Outer Banks of Currituck County contain maritime forests. According to a recent report from CAMA, the Currituck Outer Banks has the largest amount of maritime forests in North Carolina at approximately 5,000 acres (Lopazanski and Evans, 1988). With rapid development occurring in this area, these fragile and unique features are threatened. Given the important functions served by maritime forests (i.e., stabilize barrier islands, protection from storms, conserve groundwater, provide habitat for wildlife), it is Important that development occurs- in a manner that protects maritime forests to the greatest extent feasible. Therefore, the county should continue to encourage development of property in accordance with the maritime forest recommendations of the Unified Development Ordinance and provide Information to homeowners, developers and builders about the importance of maritime forests. GOAL 6.7: rO PROTECT MARIrlMEAND PFrRIF1,ED FORES7S,FROM ENCROACHING DEVELOPMENT. Strategies: 1. Provide information to homeowners, builders and developers about the benefits of maritime forests. 2. Maintain the Maritime Forest Guidelines in the Unified Development Ordinance. Dunes Currituck County has a unique geological feature in the way of significantly large dunes (over 25 feet in height). Significant dunes include Lewark's Hill and Three Sister's Hill. Realizing the importance of these unique features, Currituck County adopted provisions in the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) to protect significant dunes. The UDO indicates that all improvements shall be located seaward in view of the landward migratory movement ` of significant dunes. Further, development should not occur unless unusual factors exist that prohibit reasonable use of property. If development does occur near or at a significant dune, then a geological analysis is required and mitigation plans must be implemented. It should be noted that CAMA regulations also provide protection for dunes that are located within Ocean Hazard AEC's by limiting construction and other disturbance activities such as vegetation removal. Shorelines The Currituck Outer Banks is approximately 23 miles long and its width varies anywhere from 6,000 feet to under 1,000 feet. There are over 8,000 platted lots on the Outer Banks with over 1,400 homes already constructed or under construction. Shorelines along the Outer Banks are extremely fragile features of the environment due to their susceptibility to storms and constantly shifting sands from winds and moving water. While the beach itself is tolerant to intensive recreation, the primary dune is intolerant of any activities by man. Foot traffic over dunes greatly enhances the chances for the destruction of the dune. Vegetation is imperative to the stabilization of dunes as are raised beach accesses. Stabilization of shorelines with permanent structures such as seawalls and bulkheads is prohibited by CAMA regulations due to its adverse impact on the natural sand migration process. Therefore, coastal communities must look toward beach nourishment programs for stabilization of beaches. Today, Currituck County does not have any structures facing imminent destruction from erosion. However, the beach does provide needed access to areas north of the improved road ending in Corolla. During storm" events this means of access becomes unusable. 51 t 1 1 1 1 1 GOAL 6.8: TO ENSURE THAT THERE IS CONTINUOUS ACCESS TO AND FROM THE BEACHES NORTH OF COROLLA WHERE NO IMPROVED ROAD EXIST. Strate - ies, .1. Support a b beach acc Constraints to Development All development should be sensitive to constraints of the land. Land constraints discussed in this subchapter include soils, flooding, drainage, inland wetlands, vegetation, wildlife, and primary nursery areas. In addition to these natural constraints, manmade constraints will also be discussed. Other natural constraints to development, such as the availability of drinking water, are discussed in the County Facilities chapter. SO//$ A detailed soil survey was prepared for Currituck County in 1982. This survey indicates that 88% of the county is unsuitable for on -site septic systems and; therefore unsuitable for development. Figure 6.3 shows a general soils map using information from the 1982 soil survey. It should be noted that the general soils map shown in Figure 6.3 is intended to compare the suitability of large areas for general land uses. Because of its small scale, It should not be used for selecting a specific site for development. For that purpose, the detailed maps of the Soil Survey for Currituck County should be referred to and site evaluations should be conducted by the Currituck County Health Department. Soils in the Conetoe-Dragston-Munden and the Newhan-Corolla-Duckston group are shown as suitable for development. The Conetoe-Dragston-Munden group is characterized as being nearly level and gently sloping, well drained and moderately well drained soils that have a sandy surface layer and a loamy subsoil. The Newhan- Corolla-Duckston group is characterized as being nearly level to sloping, excessively drained, moderately drained, and poorly drained soils that are sandy throughout. Soils in the Roanoke-Tomotley group are shown as being marginally suitable for development. This group is characterized as being nearly level, poorly drained soils that have a loamy surface layer and a loamy or clayey subsoil. Soils in the Portsmouth-CapeFear-Wasda, Dare-Ponzer, Currituck, and Dorovan group are listed as being poor for development purposes. Generally these soils are nearly level, very poorly drained, have a mucky surface layer and a sandy or loamy underlying material. From an environmental standpoint, it is generally preferable to have properly operated centralized sewer systems as opposed to having individual septic systems. As such, Currituck County supports the development of Open Space Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, and Planned Residential Developments using centralized sewer systems. This type of development would allow clustering of buildings on soils unsuitable for septic absorption fields while waste water is pumped to portions of the property that can safely treat sewage. General Soils Map Flooding Due to its low elevation, Currituck County is very susceptible to flooding (Figure 6.4). In 1984, the county began participating in the National Flood Insurance program. The program is administered by the Planning and Inspections Department. Any construction proposed within the 100 year Flood Area as delineated on Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) will have to have the first floor elevation certified as 1 I being above the 100 year flood elevation. As can be seen in Figure 6.4, a majority of Currituck County Iles within the 100 year flood elevation. Sea level rising due to global warming is a significant issue facing all coastal communities. Most estimates indicate there will be a 1.6-6.6 foot rise in sea level over the next century (R. Paul Wilms). If the sea was to rise five feet, it is estimated that over 50% of I 53 1 I I 1-1 Currituck County will be inundated (R. Paul Wilms). Currituck County is not opposed to construction in areas up to five feet above sea Drainage Drainage is an important issue in the county given Currituck's low lying elevation, generally poor soils, and proximity to water bodies. Currently, the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and , Natural Resources (NCDEHNR) enforces storm water runoff and erosion control regulations. Subdivision proposals and applicable site plans are sent to NCDEHNR for approval. Currituck County supports related state regulations as well as CAMA guidelines that limit the negative impact construction activities and storm water run-off have on surface waters. The Soil Conservation Service (SCS) has taken an active role in the drainage issue by obtaining grants to improve drainage in different sections of the county and by reviewing subdivision plats. The SCS office 54 level. Currituck County will enforce flood regulations as,a means to minimize the impact of sea level rise. also assist the Planning and Inspections Department with recommendations on correcting existing drainage problems when complaints are received . The county's Unified Development Ordinance mandates the release rate of stormwater from new subdivisions shall not exceed the 10-year stormwater run-off from the area in its natural state. Detailed drainage plans are provided to the SCS office for review and field checks are done to ensure proper installation. In addition, the county requires formation of a homeowners association having the ability to collect funds for maintaining drainage areas. While homeowners associations create an entity to maintain drainage areas in new subdivisions, there is no such entity established for existing drainage areas. At present, when a drainage problem is found, the SCS office applies for a grant to alleviate the problem or the property owner where the problem exists pays the bill, even though they are correcting a problem that benefits everyone upstream from their property. This method of correcting drainage problems is uncertain at best. One way to add more certainty to the issue of maintaining pre-exisiting drainage areas is to create drainage districts. By establishing drainage districts, everyone within a specified watershed shares the costs of maintaining drainage within that watershed through a fee system. In otherwords, those who benefit from improved drainage within a watershed should bare the costs. While 'establishing drainage districts in Currituck County may not be the best solution, it is an idea worthy of investigation. /n/and Wet/ands As mentioned earlier, wetlands serve a variety of functions in the environment. They provide habitat for wildlife including waterfowl and migratory birds, buffer floodwaters, recharge groundwater, and help filter pollution. Generally, three characteristics are looked at to determine if wetlands are present. They are the soil type (i.e., presence of hydric soils), inundation of soil by surface or ground water for at least part of the year under normal circumstances and the prevalence of wetland plants (i.e., hydrophytic vegetation). Wetland areas are, for the most part, off limits to development and may only be filled according to permits issued from the Corps of Engineers (404 wetlands) and the State (CAMA wetlands). However, some limited development such as water related recreational uses and utilities may be deemed acceptable subject to compliance with applicable state and federal regulations. In Currituck County, 79.3% of the soil types are hydric or have hydric soils as a major component. Therefore, development potential in Currituck County could be severely limited depending on water table height at a particular location and the presence of wetland plants (also see Chapter 5 for a discussion of land available for development). It should be noted that Figure 6.5 indicates only the approximate boundaries of major wetland areas as identified on the National Wetlands Inventory Maps prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Individual site evaluations should be made of all properties to determine and actual existence of wetlands. Vegetation and Wllmfe Like wetlands, vegetation also serves a variety of purposes for the environment. It reduces erosion by stabilizing the soil, provides habitat for wildlife, helps recharge groundwater, helps purify the air we breathe and provides shade thereby reducing ambient air temperature. The many benefits of vegetation are recognized by Currituck County. Provisions in existing codes establish requirements for planting vegetation between different land uses and along newly created streets. The Unified Development Ordinance also contains guidelines for protecting trees during construction. A variety of wildlife can be found in Currituck County, including black bear, raccoon, deer, and fox. In addition, a large number of migratory birds and waterfowl frequent the area as it is a major link in the Atlantic Flyway. Hunting and wildlife conservation has deep roots in Currituck. However, increasing development pressures are reducing wildlife habitat. Currituck County supports the use of cluster development as a means of directing construction away from vital wildlife habitat and for the preservation of vegetation. Currituck continues to support provisions requiring the planting of vegetation contained In existing regulations. The county particularly encourages the protection of vegetation in all developments along waterways due to its significance as filtering devices and habitat providers. 55 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Figure 6.5 National Wetlands Inventory 1 EN EJAppprro)amaate Location of Wetlands According to the National Wetlands Inventory GOAL 6.9: TO INSUREDEVELOPMENT IS SEMILIVE TO THE PHYS/CAL CONSTRAINTS OF THE LAND. Strategies 1. Prohibit development requiring sewage treatment on soils that are unsuitable for on site septic systems unless seweragecan be pumped to soils that are suitable. 2. Continue participating in the National Flood Insurance Program. 3. Encourage package treatment plants for Planned Unit Developments (PUD's), Planned Residential Developments (PRD's) and Open Space Subdivisions. Use of alternative sewerage disposal systems that are environmentally safe should be encouraged (i.e., constructed wetlands). 4. Continue to work with SCS and the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resurces to review drainage and storm water control plans and to verify proposals have been implemented in the field. 5. Soil Conservation Serice should investigate the feasibility of establishing drainage districts to help maintain existing drainage areas. 56 6. Continue ordinance provisions requiring the planting of vegetation in developments and to encourage the preservation of existing vegetation, particularly along water bodies. Historical and Cultural Sites Currituck County has nine sites listed in the National Register of Historic Places. The list includes: Currituck Beach Lighthouse - Northern Outer Banks, 0.5 miles South of Corolla Currituck County Courthouse - East side of SR 1242, Currituck Currituck County Jail - (same as Courthouse) Currituck Shooting Club - West side of Outer Banks, South of Corolla, opposite of Poplar Branch Twin Houses - NC 34 at Junction of SR 1203 and SR 1147 Whalehead Club - 0.02 miles southwest of Currituck Beach Lighthouse The Baum Site -an archaeological site In Poplar Branch Shaw House - NE. corner of NC 34 and SR 1203 in Shawboro Culong - E. side of SR 1147, .2 mi. N. of junction w/SR 1148, Shawboro In addition to these sites, there are 58 recorded historic and prehistoric archaeological sites in Currituck County primarily located along the sound and river shorelines. GOAL 6.10: TO ENCOURAGETHEPRESERVAT/ON Of S/GN/f/CANTH/STOR/CAL AND CULTURAL S/TES. Strate -ales: 1. County to assist individuals who want to have their structures listed on the National Register. 2. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural resources to review development plans that require CAMA permits. 3. Support the Century Farm Family recognition program administered by the Department of Agriculture. Common Open Space Subdivisions In 1996, Currituck County substantially revised the common open space subdivision standards by placing a higher level of protection on natural, historical and cultural features. Open space standards require at least 50% of the site be designated for open space after subtracting wetlands and street right-of-ways/easements. In general, open space subdivision design allows developers the same number of lots they would have received under conventional standards, but permits lots within the development to be smaller in order to avoid sensitive areas such as wetlands, woodlands, agricultural land, and archaeological sites which remain in open space. Because open 57 space subdivisions promote development that is more sensitive to the environment and more respectful to historical and cultural features as opposed to conventional subdivisions, modest density bonus incentives are provided for developers who choose the common open space subdivision design alternative. By using an piece of property currently on the market for development for illustrative purposes, it can be shown how common open space subdivisions could be used to protect sensitive environmental and cultural areas as well as preserve the rural character of Currituck County. The property in question is 47 acres in size, has over 1,200 feet of frontage along the Currituck Sound, contains 14 acres of wetlands and woodlands along the southern 6I t property line, has a tree -lined entrance of oaks and pines, contains views of neighboring farmland, has access to county water but no central sewer; and contains a Native t t t . t American archeological site dating back to the Woodland period (1000 BC-1000 AD). Figure . 6.6 shows the existing conditions of the property. Figure 6.6 Existing Conditions view of fields a�� _ field � Gurrituck Sound view pines xisting house from ak trees field T existing dock road :: fieldmeadow view of woodlands;`.. sound Y archaeological site o8g8 LrLi-7 Feet Under conventional subdivision design standards, the minimum lots size is 40,000 sq. ft. in area, each lot must contain enough upland area to accommodate a septic system, each lot must have 125' of frontage along streets, and at least 5% of the total tract must be t t t common open space with a minimum of 20,000 sq. ft. of sound access for residents of the subdivision. With these development standards, a total of 33 lots could be placed on the 47 acre parcel (Figure 6.7). Figure 6.7 Conventional Subdivision Design space 10 as r n' • e+ • I' .„ :4 4; ♦ ' Gurrituck Sound � t fir r ^� L• s. f IL primary conservator areas o 8 g �, U-L—l1 Feet � ,a 1 Common open space subdivision design follows a ` 4-step process of: 1) Identifying primary (i.e. wetlands) and secondary conservation areas (i.e. mature woodlands, archeological sites; farmland), 2) locating house sites on the property avoiding the conservation areas, 3) aligning streets and trails, and 4) drawing lot lines. The minimum lot size for common open space subdivisions is 15,000 sq. ff. where central water is available. There is a 20' minimum lot width along streets, and as was stated above, at least 50% of the site must be preserved as open space after subtracting wetlands and street right-of-ways. Moving from conventional subdivision design to open space subdivision design is not an easy process. Development codes must be adjusted to allow design flexibility, developers must have the vision and courage to try something new, and lending institutions must be convinced there is a market for the product. Recognizing the benefits of open space subdivisions, Currituck County amended its development code to provide more flexibility in design and created incentives for developers using common open space Figure 6.8 shows a 33 lot common open space subdivision for the 47 acre site designed by Randall Arendt as excerpted from his book, Open Space Design Guidebook Albemarle - Pamlico Estuarine Re , ion (North Carolina Association of County Commissioners, June 1996). Among other things, the design protects the archeological site, preserves the tree - lined entrance, keeps houselots away from wetlands and the sound creating a natural buffer from these sensitive areas, establishes a waterfront park for the community, creates open space views for each of the lots, and prevents lots from being developed along SR 122Z an important collector road. standards. It is important that Currituck monitor those design standards to ensure they are promoting desirable subdivision design and make adjustments as needed. Mapping of primary and secondary conservation areas by the county using computer mapping to assist the development community in identifying natural and cultural features of significance to the county's quality of life would also be helpful. Careful review of the Land Use Plan mail -out survey results illustrates to developers, lenders, and county officials how common 59 i 1 1 1 open space design is in keeping with the desires of the public. - When asked what type of subdivision they prefer to see in Currituck, the public choose a common open space design (62%) over a conventional subdivision (38%). - While 62% of the respondents said there are too few recreation areas, 57% said they do not favor raising taxes to pay for additional recreation areas. Open space subdivision design requires more open space within the development (minimum 50%) versus conventional subdivisions (minimum 5%) thereby reducing the need for county operated parks. Four of the top six actions to improve the quality of life in Currituck County can be promoted using common open space subdivision design techniques: protection of water quality In the sounds and rivers (95%), protecting residential property from negative impacts (88%), protecting the environment (88%), and preserving the rural character of Currituck County (80%). - When asked the open ended question, "What do you like most about Currituck County", 48% of the respondents wrote the rural character. Clearly the public input survey responses show how common open space design coincides with the public attitudes towards quality development in the county. GOAL 6.11: TO PROMOTE COMMON OPEN SPACE SUEDIVIS/ON DESIGN THAT /S SENS/TIPE TO THE NATURAL AND CULTURAL FEATURES OF CURR/TUCK COUNTY. Strate ,ales: 1. Monitor common open space design standards for protection of natural and cultural features and adjust as needed. 2. Use computer mapping to identify primary and secondary conservation areas and make the information available to the general public. Manmade Hazards The Emergency Services Department has Identified several operations that handle one or more potentially hazardous materials. These operations include: 1. Department of Transportation Bridge Maintenance Facility, Point Harbor 2. US Fiberglass, Harbinger 3. Griggs Packing Shed, Powells Point 4. Coast Oil Company, Grandy 5. Bruce and Company, Powells Point 6. Ferrell Gas Company, Grandy 7. M.A. Guard Oil Company, Coinjock 8. Department of Transportation Maple Facility, Maple 9. DOT Ferry Operations, Currituck 10. Greg Barco (furniture refinishing), Shawboro 11. Poyner Oil Company, Moyock 12. H & W Plastics, Moyock 13. Currituck Grain, Moyock 14. W. S. Clark and Sons, Shawboro/Gregory 15. Central Fertilizer, Shawboro 16, Patrick Forbes Grain Company, Shawboro 17. Synergy Gas, Grandy 18. Currituck County Landfill, Maple 19. Mini -Gallon Fuel Oil Service, Maple' The Currituck County Airport Is also identified as a manmade hazard area in addition to businesses/operations listed above. The major concerns with airport operations involve safety and aircraft noise. Development plans for future construction near the above listed operations should be reviewed for compatibility. Residential development should be discouraged within proximity to manmade hazards. 1 G1( Introduction the respondents said the county had too few recreation areas but fifty-seven percent (57%) Up to the 1970's, county facilities consisted of said they did not want to pay more taxes or the courthouse, library, landfill and schools. user fees to provide for additional recreation However, with the population growth Currituck areas. Responses to the mail -out survey has experienced since the seventies, clearly show the county must continue to demand and need for more county facilities is balance the speed of growth with the costs of increasing. In addition to the facilities listed providing services, above, the county now provides recreation areas, maintains a centralized water system on the mainland, has a senior citizens center, Recreation oversees operation of a ' community centralized sewer system, and maintains As was stated above, the mail -out survey solid -waste convenience centers. Figure 7.1 showed that 62% of , the respondents said shows the location of major county facilities in there were too few recreation areas in the Currituck County. county as opposed to 34% who said there was the right amount. and 3% who said there were Growth pressures in Currituck have heightened too many recreation areas. In addition, awareness of the public to the costs of recreation had the lowest positive rating of all providing county facilities/services. Generally the county services listed in the survey. Finally, speaking, residential development pays less the Land Use Planpublic input meetings in taxes than it costs to provide services. generated numerous comments from the Conversely, farming, commercial public concerning the lack of recreation areas development, and industrial development - and the need to provide specific recreation pay more in taxes than the services they improvements (Appendix 1). demand. Fora "bedroom" community like Currituck, the financial ramifications of At present, improved county recreation areas residential growth should be cause for consist of ball fields, tennis courts, and concern. playgrounds located at each of the various school facilities. These facilities are provide at The Land Use Plan mail -out survey illustrates school sites in order to receive maximum use public attitudes towards this issue. Eighty-four for minimum costs. However, it is clear from percent (84%j of the respondents said they public sentiment that more recreational areas supported the county adopting a law saying are needed and that the county should take new development cannot exceed the advantage of the abundant natural amenities. county's ability to provide adequate public - A recreation committee made up of citizens facilities. In addition, seventy-four percent prepared_ recommendations for recreation (74%) of the respondents support the county's areas. These recommendations should be efforts to seek legislation for adoption of reviewed by the Planning Board and County impact fees for new developments to pay Commissioners to determine what actions their fair share costs of providing county services. Finally, sixty-two percent (62%) of should betaken. 61 Figure 7.1 -.\ r l6 - G • i St.IGO 20 i y 14 13 CAMDEN CO. Major County Facilities 1. Knolls Island Vol. Fire Dept. 2. Knotts Island Elementary School 3. Carova Beach Vol. Fire Dept. 4. Corr ola Vol. Fire DeptlCurt tuck Co. Rescue Squad S. Ocean Sands Water Treatment Plant 6. Moyock Convenience center 7. MoyockElebnentarySchool S. Moyock Vol. Fire Dept.7Currituck Co. Rescue Squad 9. Crawford Vol. Fire Dept.&FIMue Squad (Sligo) 10. Cumiuck County CourthouWAiIISherifes Dept. 11. CueftuckCounty Health DeptlWIC 12. Knapp Jr. Elementary School 13. County Water PLant 14. Crawford Vol. Fire Dept. (Maple) 15. Central Elementary School 16. Cunituck County Jr. High School 17, CunituckCounty Library is. Griggs Elementary School - 19. Lower Cum. Vol. Fire Dept.&Re3cue Squad (Grandy) 20. Sligo Convenience Center 21. Lower Cum. FireDepLbRescue Squad(Powelts Point) 22. Currituck County High School 23. Social SenAMISeniorCentedJudicialComplex 24. Currituck County Satellite Office 25. Currituck CountyNrport 26. Demo Convenience Center - - 27. GrandyConvervenceCenter 28. Spot Convenience Center 29. Knotts Island Convenience Center $0. Gibbs Woods Convergence Center 31. Carove, Convenience Center 32: Whalehead Club 33. Currituck Southern Regional BeachCccess M ajor County Facilities Virginia fso/ 2s IBB9WOOD..+^ KNOTTS ISLAND 1 3 CAROVA � a31 A TUCK t n � z � ; y COROLLA -A 22 1 16 >t 32 INJOCK f 4 d a • ty 33 18 � • \ v n AND f 7 A G �%,,dARYISSURG b \ 2 POWELLS POINT 21 8 l HARBINGER ; DARE � POINT HARBOR CO. GOAL 7.1: TO PROVIDE ENOUGH RECREATIONAL FACILITIES TO MEET THE NEEDS OF ALL CITIZENS AND TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE NATURAL AMENITIES OF CURRITUCK COUNTY. Strategies; 1. Continue to establish community recreation areas at existing and new school sites in order to maximize benefits. 2. The Planning Board and Board of Commissioners should review the recommendations of the . Recreation Committee to determine appropriate actions. 62 U 1 11 LJ �II 3. Encourage funding of recreational programs through private funds, grants, and public funds (i.e., Impact fees); 4. Continue to require dedication of land In large developments (20 lots or more) for public purposes and allow the payment of fees instead of dedication where appropriate. Coastal and EstuarineBeach Access Public access to the beach, sounds and rivers will always be an issue in Currituck County. Currently there are 11 CAMA sound and ocean access areas on the Currituck Outer Banks, one of which is designated as a regional access (parking, boardwalk, bath facilities).. In addition, the county has purchased the Whalehead Club on the Outer Banks which includes boat docking facilities. On the Currituck mainland, there are two Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC) boat launching areas (Coinjock, Poplar Branch) and the county has acquired additional land in the Sligo area that will also be improved as a WRC boating area. Three areas of the county that are lacking in Improved public water access areas are Knotts Island, Gibbs Woods, and lower Currituck. In addition, there are no public access points to the Albemarle Sound. There are; however, several privately controlled boating access areas (Appendix 4). The county supports increasing the number of boat and recreational facilities in Currituck and encourages boat and recreation facilities in residential subdivisions for use by residents and the public where appropriate. GOAL 7.2: TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF PUBLIC BEACH, SOUND AND RIVER ACCESSES AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES. Strategies: 1. Inventory all potential ocean and sound access. points and establish a priority rating for funding as part of a comprehensive recreation program; 2. Apply for CAMA, WRC (Wildlife Resources Commission) and applicable land and water conservation funds to establish more ocean and sound accesses in the county on the Outer Banks and the mainland; 3. Establish additional county recreational and boating facilities in Currituck with particular attention to those areas where limited access exists (Knotts Island, Gibbs Woods, Lower Currituck). olid Waste Disvosal Currituck County belongs to the Albemarle Regional Solid Waste Management Authority with seven other northeastern North Carolina counties. Membership in this authority is the direct result of the state adopting Senate Bill 111 requiring lined landfills to protect ground water -sources. Since lined landfills are very expensive, it made sense to regionalize solid waste. As indicated in Figure 7.1, the county currently operates a solid waste transfer station in 63 Maple, six manned convenience centers (Knotts Island, Moyock, Sligo, Barco, Grandy, and Spot), and two un-manned convenience centers (Gibbs Woods, Carova). Convenience centers are areas where the public brings its trash for disposal and recycling. Door-to-door trash pick-up is provided on the Currituck Outer Banks from Corolla to the Dare County line for an additional fee to property owners in that area. This method of disposal was deemed most appropriate for the southern Currituck Outer Banks since an overwhelming majority of the homes are rental 1 and door-to-door pick-up is much more convenient for a transient population. Given the relatively low density of Currituck and other northeastern counties, a regional approach to solid waste Is the most cost effective method of handling the matter. Therefore, it is expected that Currituck County will continue participation in the Albemarle Regional Solid Waste Authority. GOAL 7.3: TO ENSURE THAT SOLID WASTE MATERIALS ARE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND TO ENCOURAGE RECYCLING. Strategies: 1. Continue participation in the Albemarle Regional Solid Waste Authority; 3. Comply with provisions of Senate Bill 111 by emphasizing recycling and properly disposing of materials considered to be hazardous. County Water Mainland In 1990, Currituck County began operating the county water system serving the northern and central portions of the mainland. The system, constructed at a cost of $9.7 million, has a treatment and storage capacity of 1 million gallons per day. There are three elevated storage tanks (Currituck - 300,000 gallons, Moyock - 100,000 gallons, Grandy - 100,000 gallons) and over 150 miles of pipe have been laid. In December of 1994, Currituck County adopted the Water Supply Plan for Mainland Currituck in accordance with state law (Appendix 3). The next update of the water supply plan will be 1999. Since adoption of the plan, the county has added 10 new well fields. Currently, raw water for the system is obtained from 28 wells ranging in depth from 70 feet to 200 feet. These wells draw water from the Surficial and Yorktown aquifers and are located on county leased property in Maple near the water plant. The county recently outlined a 5 year action plan that calls for the following: extending the water main to the south end of the county, preparing a study evaluating the quality of raw water within the deep aquifer at Maple to determine the most efficient reverse osmosis system, developing 10 additional wells in the Maple area to maximize production at the existing water plant, and establishing a reverse osmosis plant with production capacity of approximately .75 million gallons per day. Figure 7.2 shows the existing and proposed water line mains. One of the issues that must be addressed is where to dispose of the salt water brime extracted from the reverse osmosis process. In addition, the county will need to develop internal policies on line extensions to existing subdivisions since the water line extension plan only calls for placing the line along US Highway 158. Outer Banks There are no plans to study centralized water on the northern Currituck Outer Banks (north of Corolla, 4-wheel drive area) at this time due to the low density (322 homes as of December, 1996) in the area. However, Currituck County has undertaken an extensive program to identify water supplies and future water needs on the southern Outer Banks. In 1994, a three - phased study was completed by the engineering firm of Stroud and Associates which surveyed existing water systems, analyzed areas without central water, provided recommendations on how best to manage water supplies in the area, and provide central water to those areas not presently served. Recommendations from this plan are being reviewed by County Commissioners for action and included: - recommendation to provide central water to those areas not presently served paid for through a service district M I 1 I 1 Figure 7.2 County Water System Expansion, 1g.96 tiP a,�c 4� 4� N t ftJRR '� I cy wa, v awor aRso yin, +t� SECQ FUR SCALE CIhC[ AWwm Imwkw o, wn MMOK�� YY Q 0.4m - �pOCY21 li - AMA A14„MIW - - interconnecting existing and proposed waters systems to better control groundwater pumping All existing Planned Unit Developments (PUD's) on the southern Currituck Outer Banks have their own or shared water systems. They Include: Pine Island; Currituck Club, Ocean Sands, Buck Isla nd/Monteray Shores, Corolla Light, and the Villages at Ocean Hill. Areas on the southern Currituck Outer Banks that do not have centralized water available are: Corolla Village, Ocean Hill subdivision, Whalehead subdivision, Spindrift subdivision, and Ocean Sands subdivision Sections A. B, and C. For the long term interests of the southern Currituck Outer Banks, it will be necessary to for the county to identify future water supplies; continue to look towards interconnecting existing water systems, and work to provide centralized water to those areas that are presently not served by a water system. Meaningful citizen input is essential and assistance will be critical in meeting long range water needs on the southern Currituck Outer Banks. Knotts Island & Gibbs Woods All dwellings and businesses in Gibbs Woods and Knotts Island obtain their drinking water from wells. In 1996, a study was prepared, in accordance with a recommendation from the 1990 Land Use Plan, to determine the feasibility of providing centralized water to Knotts Island and Gibbs Woods. The study, identified existing conditions in these areas, provided population projections, determined infrastructure needs and associated costs, and recommended a sources of revenues. The study also indicated water supplies for a centralized water system could be obtained fromJhe Yorktown aquifer. One of the most important factors affecting costs of centralized water is the provision of fire hydrants. Following is Table 7A which provides the estimated per connection costs 65 of providing centralized water with and without Table fire hydrant protection. Estimated Per Connection Cost For Central Water Knotts Island 8,: Gibbs Woods,1996 INITIAL AT BUILD -OUT LOCA11ON # Connections Cost/Connection # Connections Cost/Connection Knotts Island 623 $8,368 2842 $2873 (with fire hydrants) Knotts Island 623 $5,647 2842 $2277 (w/o fire hydrants) Gibbs Woods 176 $11,557 362 $6,878 (with fire hydrants) Gibbs Woods 176 $7,818 362 $5,061 (w/o fire hydrants) Bissell Professional Group in association with Edwin Andrews & Associates As can be seen in Table 7A, the number of connections to a water system also drastically effects the costs of that system. Therefore it is important to know how willing people are to connect to a central water system. In order to make that determination, surveys were sent to the land owners in Knotts Island and Gibbs Woods. A total of 471 (46%) of the 1,028 surveys mailed were returned. Results of the mail -out survey showed that 54% of the Knotts Island land owners responding were opposed to centralized water, 36% were in favor, and 10% were undecided. In Gibbs Woods, the survey showed 45% of the land owners responding were opposed to centralized water, 47% were in favor of centralized water, and 8% were undecided. The survey results indicate there is no strong desire for centralized water on Knotts Island and Gibbs Woods. Therefore, the county does not intend to pursue centralized water in either area given the public opinion and the fact there does not -appear to be any threat to existing ground water supplies. Other Water Supply Issues Working with surrounding communities to meet future water supply needs is an issue receiving consideration in northeastern North Carolina. A study by Hobbs, Upchurch & Associates is underway to determine the feasibility of regionalized water. The approach of multiple jurisdictions working together has the support of Currituck residents as 82% of the mail -out survey respondents supported this idea as opposed to only 1 % of the people opposed to the idea. Therefore Currituck County should continue to participate in discussions concern the regionalized approach to meeting future water needs. Since many residents rely on wells for water, Currituck County may want to consider regulations protecting ground water sources from contamination. A report should be prepared by the Health Department and Planning and Inspections Department outlining the issues involved in wellhead protection and presented to the Board of Commissioners for consideration. GOAL 7.4: TO ENSURE THERE ARE ADEQUATE WATER SUPPLIES THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY. II Strate .ales: I 1 1. Implement the 5 year action plan for the mainland water system that calls for the following: extending the water main to the south end of the county, prepare a study evaluating the quality of raw water within the deep aquifer at Maple to determine the most efficient reverse osmosis system, develop 10 additional wells In the Maple area to maximize production at the existing water plant, and establish a reverse osmosis plant with production capacity of approximately .75 million gallons per day. 2. Identify the method of disposing salt water brime removed from drinking water during the reverse osmosis process. 3. Establish policies on water line extension to existing homes and subdivisions. 4. On the southern Currituck Outer Banks, the county, working with local citizens, should continue to Identify future water supplies, look towards interconnecting existing water systems, and work to provide centralized water to those areas that are presently not served by a water system. 5. Continue to participate in discussions on regionalized water. 6. Prepare a report outlining the issues involved in adopting wellhead protection regulations for consideration by the Board of Commissioners. 7. Make sure all developments indicate well locations on their lots and adjoining lots to ensure 100 foot separation from septic systems. Government Administrative Services and Schools As Currituck's population continues to grow, greater pressure is being placed on county facilities. The county is currently in the process of building a new courthouse facility, a new high school, and starting renovation work at qn existing elementary school. In addition, space for administrative offices in the courthouse is no longer available as mobile units are now being used. Given the unique geographical shape of Currituck County, it is often difficult to adequately serve remote sections of the county such as Knotts Island, Gibbs Woods, and the Outer Banks. To help alleviate a portion of the problem, the county established a satellite office on the Outer Banks In 1991. Community buildings on Knotts Island (fire station, school) and Gibbs Woods are used for meetings, tax listings, etc.. Of all the county facilities, none is facing more growth pressures than the schools. The new high school under construction should be 67 ready for occupancy in the fall of 1997 and renovation work at Central Elementary School was started in 1997. In addition to these projects, a new elementary school is needed in the northern section of Currituck County in the near future. Construction of the northern elementary school is anticipated to start in FY 1998/1999. The county received $5.2 million dollars from the State to help meet construction needs and an additional $3 million dollars will be provided from the recently passed state school bond referendum. Table 7B shows the average number of students attending each school for the 1995/96 school year as well as the maximum capacity of each school. Its important to note that school capacities do not include mobile classrooms. Although mobile units are being used during the 96/97 school year, by the fall of 1997 when the new high school is complete and the other schools have been converted, the county will no longer be using mobile classrooms. It is the intention of the county to provide a level of service for .schools that does not include mobile classrooms. Further, the level of service is defined as being able to accommodate 23 students per classroom for elementary schools, 26 students per classroom for junior high, and 28 students per classroom for high school. Table 7C shows the expected capacities for each school in the fail of 1997 when the new able 7B high school Is complete, the current high school Is converted to a junior high school, and the current junior high school is converted to an elementary school. Figure 7.2 identifies county school sites and other major governmental facilities. Currituck County School Facilities January, 1997 1995/96 Average Schod Nos Classrooms Daily Membership Max Capacity Griggs Elementary 24 473 552 Knotts Is. Elementary 8 159 184 Central Elementary 16 360 368 Moyock Elementary 26 701. 598 Knapp Junior High School 14 475 364 Currituck High School 22 734 616 - The number of students at capacity was calculated by the number of classrooms multiplied by 23 students in elementary school, 26 students in junior high school, and 28 students in high school. - Maximum capacity is determined by not using mobile classrooms. The county desires a level of service that does not include mobile classrooms. Construction projects are underway to achieve that level of service Table 7C Anticipated School Capacities For Gurrituck County. Fall, 1097 Schod Max Capacity Griggs Elementary 552 Knotts Is. Elementary 184 Central Elementary 358 Moyock Elementary 598 Knapp Elementary 364 Currituck Junior High 560 New Currituck High School 1,120 Growth Control Results from the public input meetings and mail -out survey indicate residents for the most part are not opposed to development; however they do want growth to be controlled. What "controlled growth" means differs from person -to -person. For purposes of this section, controlled growth will be discussed in terms of adequacy of public facilities, density, and costs of growth. Adequate Public Facilities As was mentioned in the chapter on population, Currituck County was the fifth fastest growing county in the state between 1990 and 1994. While growth has its positive effects, it also results in additional traffic, alteration of the rural character of the county, and greater pressures on county services. To gain greater control on the growth issue as it relates to county services, Currituck County adopted an adequate public facilities provision to the Unified Development Ordinance as a compliment to existing growth control tools (i.e. zoning, subdivision regulations, special use permits, planned unit development standards, etc.). 1 The adequate public facilities provision allows the county to assess the impact any development proposal needing a special use or conditional use permit has on county facilities. If the development proposal does not exceed the county's ability to provide _-adequate public facilities within two years of Initial development approval, as identified in the County's Capital Improvement Plan, the project may be approved. Likewise, if the proposal exceeds the county's ability to provide adequate public facilities within two years of initial approval, the development may be denied. The ordinance also provides authority for the county to time development to assure adequate public facilities are in place. Currituck County adopted adequate public facilities provisions in order to retain control over the amount, type and direction of development as opposed to reacting to it. The county's adequate pubic facilities provisions has overwhelming public support as 84% of the Land Use Plan mail -out survey respondents said they supported the measure as opposed to only 8% who opposed it. All subdivisions of 20 or more lots must submit a development impact statement containing a physical- analysis, housing market analysis, environmental impact analysis, fiscal analysis, and traffic analysis. These reports provide the county a basis to assess the impact of development on county services and the community as a whole. No development requiring a special use or conditional use permit shall be approved until it can be shown that there will be adequate public facilities to accommodate proposed development.. Public facilities may be determined as being adequate to serve the needs of proposed development when the following conditions have been found to be meet within two years of initial approval: A. Schools. Schools servicing the development will have adequate capacity to handle the projected enrollment from the new development. B. Water Supply. There will be adequate public water supply available, in terms of 69 potable water and water for fire protection where applicable, to service the development. C. Fire, Rescue, and Police: Fire, rescue and police protection shall be adequate to protect people and property in the proposed development. D. Roads: Roads within proposed developments shall connect to local roads, observe future roads projected in the land use plan and Thoroughfare Plan where applicable, and be of adequate capacity to handle projected traffic flow. E. Other Services. Other public services affected by the proposed development, Including but not limited to library, recreation and health services, shall be adequate to serve the development at substantially the same level of service as is available to other parts of the county. The county should review its level of service standards established in the Unified Development Ordinance to ensure they are appropriate for the community. Currituck should also determine if rezoning of property to higher density residential districts should be reviewed under the adequate public facilities provisions and adjusts the standards as warranted. Finally, the county shall periodically review population projections, student projections, the status of existing facilities, and the County Capital Improvement Plan in order to keep. the adequate public facilities review timely. Residential Density One of the most important elements affecting the impact of development on the community is density. Until 1995, the minimum lot size in the entire county was 30,000 sq. ft. except on the northern beaches where the minimum lot size was 120,000 sq. ff.. In 1995, the Board of Commissioners increased the minimum lot size in most zoning districts to 40,000 sq. ff. except on the northern beaches, where the minimum lot .size remained at 120,000 sq. ft., and the Agricultural zoning district. In the Agricultural zoning district, which comprises a majority of the land in Currituck County, the minimum lot size was increased to three acres, When asked in the mail -out survey what level of support the public had for increasing lot sizes, those having a position voted nearly two to one in favor of increasing lot sizes (see Appendix 1). Costs of Growth Historically, communities have concentrated on the physical aspects of growth focusing on density, zoning, and subdivision regulations. Once a development proposal meets community technical standards, It is approved. However, more communities are taking a look not only on the physical aspects of growth, but also the financial implications of growth. Currituck County is one of those communities. In 1996, Tischler and Associates, with assistance from the law firm of Burke, Weaver & Prell, completed the Financing Growth Plan for Currituck County. The plan consisted of reports on population and household trends, fiscal impacts of growth on the county and schools, impact of revenue alternatives, and steps necessary to implement an impact fee program. The report on population and household trends used was based on historical growth trends in Currituck County. Results of this report can be found in the Chapter 2, Population. The report on fiscal implications of growth is a planning tool used to compare the impacts of different land use assumptions on public sector costs and revenues. In order to make projections, estimates were made on number, type and value of projected value of housing units, residential occupancy rates, number of new residents and public school students per dwelling unit, and number of non-residential sq. ff. per job. Taking these and other factors into consideration, the report showed that new development would generate net revenues to the county, but significant net costs to the 70 schools estimated to be $3.6 million between 1996 and 2005. Table 7D illustrates the total revenues and costs for the county and schools showing a cumulative net deficit until the year 2005. The county should periodically review public sector cost and revenue projections in order to be better prepared for the financial implications of growth. Having identified a net deficit, the next report outlined methods to offset those deficits concentrating on the Transfer Tax, Occupancy Tax and Impact Fees. The report showed revenues from the occupancy tax would not be sufficient to offset school capital costs. Revenues from the Transfer Tax did offset costs, however was susceptible to downturns in the economy. Impact fees set at $4,000 per unit, also offset costs but was not susceptible to downturns in the economy (Table 7E). Although it is unlikely the County would adopt per unit fee as high as $4,000 this report does illustrate impact fees is a useful tool to fund capital facilities. The final report outlined steps for the county to pursue impact fees. An impact fee is a one time assessment imposed on new development. It is used by local governments to help offset the costs of providing capital facilities associated with a particular development (i.e., added school facilities needed to serve the students generated from that development). Much time and effort are necessary in establishing procedures to determine what actual impacts a particular development has on the community. However, if properly implemented, impact fees could be a much needed source of income for providing County facilities without imposing an additional burden on existing taxpayers. Impact fees has much public support as the Land Use Plan mail -out survey showed that 74% of the respondents favored Impact fees as opposed to 9% of the respondents who opposed them. t 1 1 1 1 1 Budget Summary Impact of Growth Base Case Year => 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 9 10 (Values in $000's) 1996 1997 1998 - 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 REVENUES PROP Residential County Prop. Tax*.';;::.::.';,":;*'::':"::.$142 $284 $426 $569 $711 $853 $995 $1,137 ' $1,279 $1,421 TAXES Commercial County Prop. Ta: $3 $5 $8 $10 $13 $15 $18 $20 $23 $25 Residential School Prop. Tax $220 $441 $661 $881 $1,102 $1,322 . $1,542 $1.763 $1,983 $2,203 Commercial School Prop. Ta $4 $8 $12 $16 $19 $23 $27 $31 $35 $39 Countywide Fire District Tax $44 $89 $133 $178 $222 $267 $311 $355 $400 $444 Subtotal: Property Taxes $413 $827 $1,240 $1.653 $2,066 $2,460 $2,893 $3,306 $3.719 $4,133 OTHER 1 Animal Taxes $0 $0 $1 + $1 $1 $1 $2 $2 $2 $2 2 Marriage Licenses $0 s0 $0 $0 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 3 Franchise Taxes $1 $3 $4 $5 $7 $8 $9 $11 $12 $13 4 Animal Control Fees $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 St 5 Sales Tax -Unrestricted $27 $55 $82 $109 $137 $164 $191 $219 $246 $273 6 Sales Tax -Restricted, County $17 $34 $51 $68 $85 $102 $119 $135 $152 $169 7 Sales Tax -Restricted, School $14 $28 $42 $55 $69 $83 $97 $111 $125 $138 8 Bldg PrmVExcise Tax (local s. $28 $28 $28 $28 $28 $28 $28 $28 $28 $28 9 Bldg PrmVExcise Tax (local s $6 $6 $6 $6 $6 $6 $6 $6 $6 $6 10 Bldg PrmtExcise Tax (locals $18 $18 $18 $18 $18 $18 $18 $18 $18 $18 11 Bldg PrmtExcise Tax (local s $22 $22 $22 $22 $22 $22 $22 $22 $22 $22 12 Bldg PrmVExcise Tax (local s $199 $199 $199 $199 $199 $199 $199 $199 $199 $199 13 14 H 15 a 1s t7 17 18 � 19 20 21 J 22 d 23 24 25 26 27 28 Subtotal: Other Revenues $333 $393 $453 $512 $572 $632 $692 $752 $812 $871 TOTAL ANNUAL REVENUES: $746 $1,219 $1,692 $2,166 $2.639 $3.112 $3.585 $4,058 $4,531 $5,004 EXPENSES Operating Costs $380 $759 $1,139 $1,518 $1,898 $2.278 $2,657 $3,037 $3,416 $3,796 Staff Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CF Pay -As -You -Go $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CF Debt Service $476 $476 $833 $833 $833 $833 $833 $833 $833 $833 TOTAL ANNUAL COSTS: $4.629 $855 $1.235 $1,971 $2,351 $2,731 $3,110 $3,490 $3,869 $4,249 NET FISCAL IMPACT Annual $14�)IS1SL ($279) ($186) ($92) $1 $95 $188 $282 $375 Cumulative ($109) ($125) ($404) ($589) ($681) ($680) ($585) ($397) ($115) $261 CIUM I►roptlolrty sonwaro 01/to/00 - Table --'� ---- ---------- Cumulative Results (Revenues less Costs) Base Case and Three Alternatives Currituck County Schools Thousands of 1995 Dollars Year _ Alternative 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Base Case w ($406 ($743)($1,381)($1,949)($2,448)($2,877)($3,236)($3,527)($3,747)($3,898 Impact Fee $846 $1,761 $2,375 $3,059 $3,812 $4,635 $5,528 $6,489 $7,521 $8,622 Transfer Tax $349 $767 $885 $1,072 $1,328 $1,654 $2,050 $2,515 $3,050 $3,654 Occupancy Tax ($370) ($634)($1,163 ($1,587)($1,904)($2,116 ($2,222 ($2,222)($2,116)($1,905 GOAL 7.5: TO PROVIDE THE RESIDENTS OF CURRITUCK THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF COUNTY SERVICES AND TO ENSURE THAT ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES ARE AVAILABLE TO MEET CURRENT AND LONG RANGE NEEDS OF THE COUNTY. Strategies: 1. Continue to enforce adequate public facilities standards to properly accommodate growth without adversely affecting the provision of county services 2. The county should review it's level of service standards established in the Unified Development Ordinance to ensure they are appropriate for the community. 3. Currituck should determine if rezoning of property to higher density residential districts needs to be reviewed under the adequate public facilities provisions and adjusts the standards as warranted. 4. The county and schools system shall periodically review population projections, student projections, the status of existing facilities, and the County Capital Improvement Plan in order to keep the adequate public facilities review timely. 5. The county should periodically review public sector cost and revenue projections in order to improve financial planning for the provision of county facilities and services. 6. The county should pursue state authorization for impact fees and adopt an impact fee ordinance. 72 u 7�7 fl 1 1 7 1 CHAPTER 8 Draft 1 / 14 97 STORM HAZARDS Introduction All coastal communities face the threat of hurricanes, northeasters, and other major storm events. Unfortunately, people have a tendency to overlook the massive destruction these storms can cause, particularly after extended periods of time between major storm events. However, Hurricanes Hugo and Andrew hitting the South Carolina coast and Florida coast respectively, once again brought to light the devastation that could occur during a major storm event. Currituck County acknowledges that a major storm event will impact the area. The purpose of this chapter is to assist Currituck County in managing development in potentially hazardous areas by establishing storm hazard mitigation policies to reduce the risks associated with future hurricanes. Further, this chapter establishes post -disaster reconstruction/recovery policies. Finally, current evacuation plans will be reviewed for their adequacy. torm Hazard Mitiaatlon Storm hazard mitigation,, or actions taken to reduce the impact of a disaster, involve a number of activities and policy decisions. However, prior to discussing those activities and policies, it is important to identify the types of hazards (including the relative severity and magnitude of risks), and the extent of development located in storm hazard areas. Hurricanes are extremely powerful, often unpredictable forces of nature. The two most severe effects are fatalities and property damage, which are usually the result of four causes: high winds, flooding, wave action, and erosion. These are discussed briefly as follows: a. Hiah Wi High winds are the major, force of a hurricane which, by definition, is a tropical disturbance with sustained winds of at least 73 miles per hour. Extreme hurricanes can have winds of up to 165 miles per hour, with gusts up to 200 miles per hour (Figure 8.1). These winds circulate around the center or "eye" of the storm. Although the friction or impact of the winds hitting land from the water causes some dissipation of the full force, there is still a tremendous amount of energy left to cause damage to buildings, overturn mobile homes, down trees and power lines, and destroy crops. Also, tornadoes can often be spawned by hurricane wind patterns. Wind stress is an important consideration in storm hazard mitigation planning. Becduse of Currituck's location and a hurricane's size and power, it is likely that all of Currituck County would be subject to the same wind velocity in the event of a storm. POLICY: Currituck County enforces the N. C. State Building Code, particularly requirements of construction standards to meet wind -resistive factors, i.e., "design wind velocity". The county also enforces provisions in the State Building Code requiring tie -downs. for mobile homes, which help resist wind damage. Flooding, on the other hand, may not affect all areas with equal force. The excessive amounts of rainfall and the "storm surge" which often accompany hurricanes can cause massive coastal and riverine flooding causing excessive 1 73 property damage and deaths by drownings. In fact, more deaths are caused by drowning than any other cause In hurricanes. Flooding is particularly a problem in ocean coastal areas because of the storm surge and low-lying areas. The amount of flooding a particular area receives is related to storm strength (Figure 8.1 and 8.2). However, flooding can cause extensive damage in inland areas also, since many coastal areas have low elevations and are located in high hazard or "Zone A" flood areas according to the Federal Emergency Management Agency Maps. Based on flood insurance maps prepared for Currituck County, much of the county is classified as being in the 100-year "high hazard" flood zone, or Zone A (see "Flood Hazard" Map", figure 6.4). Because of low elevation, much of the county would be subject to flooding during a severe hurricane. There are: however, "pockets" of areas classified as "Zone C", i.e., in the 500-year "minimally flooded" area. In severe storms, Zone C areas would also likely be flooded, but risks are not as severe as for Zone A areas. Flooding can not only cause damage to buildings, but saltwater flooding can cause serious damage to croplands, which took place in the Albemarle region, Including Currituck County, in 1954 and 1955 from Hurricanes Hazel, Connie, Dianne, and lone (McElyea, Brower, & Godschalk, pp. 2-8, 9). POLICY: Currituck County is supportive of the hazard mitigation elements of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). The county has had the Flood Insurance Rate Maps since November 1, 1984 and all reference to Flood Hazard Areas in the LUP refer to flood hazards as identified by these maps. Currituck County also participates in the Community Rating System (CRS) which is a voluntary program whereby persons are given deductions on flood insurance rates when their communities go beyond the minimum NFIP standards. Finally, Currituck County also supports continued enforcement of the CAMA and 404 Wetlands development permit processes in areas potentially susceptible to flooding. Figure 8.1 Saffir/Simpson Hurricane Scale Ranges Scale Number Central Pressure Winds Winds Cateaonr Millibars Inches Q1IPFfl (ICIs) Damage 1 >980 28.94 74-95 64-83 Minimal 2 965-979 28.5-28.91 96-110 84-96 Moderate 3 945-964 27.91-28.47 111-130 97-113 Extensive 4 920-944 27.17- 27.88 131-155 114-135 Extreme 5 <920 1 <27.17 >155 >135 Catastrophic 1 74 Figure 8.2. THE PREPARATION OF THIS MAP WAS FINANCED IN PART THROUGH A GRANT PROVIDED BY THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, THROUGH FUNDS PROVIDED BY THE COASTAL MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1972, AS AMENDED, WHICH IS ADMINISTERED BY THE OFFICE OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT, NATIONAL ` OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION. �A117/ do • • ''�$' it • ..y c1 N • t 100 • N COMPOSITE MAP: EXISTING LAND USE -- AND STORM SURGE INUNDATION _ LEGEND Nk *• S a Residential/Recreational Commerical ' + Industrial - Governmental • ' i®Category 1 - 2 Surge Area Category 3 Additional Surge Area • • , Category 4 - 5 Additional Surge Area • c. Wave Action Damage from wave action is connected very closely to the storm surge, i.e., wind - driven water with high waves moving to vulnerable shoreline areas. Areas most likely to be affected are ocean hazard areas and estuarine shoreline areas. There are extensive estuarine shoreline areas (75 feet inland from the mean high water mark of estuarine waters) in the county and ocean hazard areas along the Outer Banks. Wave action damage would have the most significant impact along the Atlantic Ocean beach front and sound shoreline. As the existing land use map and the Flood Hazard Boundary Map show, there is a significant amount of residential development in or near the estuarine shoreline area and development continuing along the Outer Banks. Wave action can cause erosion as well as push possible flood waters to areas not reached by the storm surge itself. The estuarine shoreline along Currituck's riverine shores, i.e., Shingle Landing Creek at Moyock, is sufficiently inland from an open coast so that the wave energy is dispersed and diffracted, mainly by the proximity to forested areas. d. Erosion The final major consideration in storm hazard mitigation Is severe erosion, caused by high winds, high water, and heavy wave action. Again, in Currituck County, the area most susceptible to storm -related erosion is the estuarine shoreline AEC (Area of Environmental Concern) along the Currituck Sound and the ocean front. This is essentially the same area potentially affected by the action of damaging waves and described in "c" above. Shoreline erosion could lead to loss of property through portions of waterfront lots being washed into the sound and ocean or even actual structural damage to buildings. Erosion potential is an important factor to consider in developing storm hazard mitigation policies. POLICY: Wave Action and Shoreline Erosion: Currituck County is supportive of the CAMA development permit process for estuarine shoreline and ocean front areas and the requisite development standards which encourage both shoreline stabilization and facilitation of proper drainage. The Unified Development Ordinance contains provisions providing some level of protection for significant dunes and contains recommendations for preserving maritime forests. e. Implementation: Storm Hazard Mitigation 1. Currituck County has adopted a Flood Damage Ordinance for the Regular Phase of the National Flood Insurance Program. This ordinance requires basic floodproofing for all new construction, to the base flood elevation. The base flood elevation, as shown on the flood insurance maps, is the elevation of the 100-year flood. This program is administered by the Planning and Inspections Department. 2. Currituck County participates in the Community Rating System (CRS) which is a voluntary program . whereby persons are given deductions on flood Insurance rates when their communities go beyond the minimum NFIP mitigation standards. 3. The county will continue to support enforcement of State and Federal programs which aid in mitigation of hurricane hazards, including CAMA; the Coastal Barrier Resources Act, and ' the U. S. Army Corps of engineers 404 permit process. 4. Currituck County enforces the North Carolina State Building Code which provides minimum . construction standards for all construction activities. 5. Currituck County has adopted a Unified Development Ordinance that places zoning, flood and subdivision regulations into one document. The cumulative effect of the Ordinance 76 can influence the outcome of a major storm event. Protective measures such as building and zoning requirements, storm water requirements, flood regulations, and maritime forest guidelines can have a direct impact of he outcome of a storm. Post Disaster and Recovery Plans If anything can be learned from the events surrounding Hurricanes Hugo and Andrew, it is the importance of having post disaster and recovery plans prior to a major storm event. Establishing such plans would be in keeping with Currituck County's goals. GOAL 8.1: TO ENSURE THE COUNTY CAN EFFECTIVELY HANDLE A MAJOR STORM EVENT IN TERMS OF IMMEDIATE NEEDS AND LONG RANGE RECONSTRUCTION. Strateaies: 1. Emergency Services to educate all agencies involved during major storm events of their proper roles. This portion of the land use plan establishes a general recovery and reconstruction plan. a. Appointment of a "Post Disaster Recovery Team" In the event of a major storm having landfall in the vicinity of Currituck County, when evacuation orders are issued, the Chairman of the County Board of Commissioners shall appoint a "Post - Disaster Recovery Team". This team shall consist of all of the members of the Evacuation Plan Support Group as identified in the Currituck County Evacuation Plan, and others whom the Chairman may appoint. The total team may consist of the following: 1. Emergency Services Director (Team Leader) 2. County Finance Officer 3. County Sheriff 4. County Building Inspector 5. . Director of Social Services 6. Local realtor or building contractor 7. County Health Department The Emergency Services Director will serve as the Team Leader and will be responsible to the Chairman of the Board of Commissioners. The base of operations will be the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) identified in the County Evacuation Plan. The EOC is responsible for the following: 1. Establishing and overall restoration schedule. 2. Setting restoration priorities. 3. Determining requirements for outside assistance and . requesting such assistance when beyond local capabilities. A' Keeping the appropriate county and State officials informed. 5. Keeping the public informed. 6. Assembling and maintaining records of actions taken and expenditures and obligations incurred. . 7. Recommending to the Chairman of the Board of Commissioners to proclaim a local "state of emergency" if warranted. 8. Commencing and coordinating cleanup, debris removal and utility restoration which would include coordination of restoration activities undertaken by private utility companies. 9. Coordinating repair and restoration of essential public facilities and services in accordance with determined priorities. 77 10. Assisting private businesses and individual property owners In obtaining Information on the various types of assistance that might be available to them from federal and state agencies. 11. Monitor health conditions of water supplies and sewer systems. b. Immediate Clean -Up and Debris Removal As soon as practical after the storm, the Disaster Recovery Team will direct appropriate county personnel, and as necessary, request state and/or federal assistance to begin clearing fallen trees and other debris from the county's roads and bridges. c. Lona Term Recovery/Restoration The Disaster Recovery Team will be responsible for overseeing the orderly implementation of the reconstruction process after a major storm or hurricane in accord with the county's policies. The county would contact state and federal agencies to request financial assistance to repair or reconstruct damaged or destroyed property. If funds are available, the county would consider purchasing lands in hazard areas as a mitigation measure. Damage Assessments Damage assessments will be necessary to determine as quickly as possible a realistic estimate of the amount of damage caused by a hurricane or major storm. Information such as the number of structures damaged, the magnitude of damage, and the estimated total dollar loss will need to be developed. As soon as .practical after the storm, i.e., clearance of major highways and paved roads In the county, the Disaster Recovery Team Leader shall set up a Damage Assessment Team (DAT), which may consist of the Public Works Director, Emergency Services Director, personnel from the Currituck County Tax Department and Planning and Inspections Department. The DAT will Immediately begin to make "windshield" surveys of damaged structures to initially assess damages and provide a preliminary dollar value of repairs or replacement. The following general criteria shall be utilized: a. Destroyed (repairs would cost more than 80 percent of value). b. Major (repairs would cost more than 30 percent of the value). c. Minor (repairs would cost less than 30 percent of the value, but the structure is currently uninhabitable). d. Habitable (some minor damage, with repairs less than 15 percent of the value). Each damage assessment will be documented according to county tax records. Also, county tax maps (including aerial photographs) and/or records may be used for identification purposes. The total estimated dollar value of damages will be summarized and reported to the Disaster Recovery Team Leader. 2. Reconstruction Development Standards Generally, reconstruction shall be held at least to the same standards as before the storm. However, developed structures which were destroyed and which did not conform to the county's storm hazard mitigation policies, i.e., with basic measures to reduce damage by high winds, flooding, wave action or erosion, must be redeveloped according to those policies. In some instances, this may mean relocation of construction, or no reconstruction at all. Building permits to restore destroyed or damaged structures, which were built in conformance with the State Building Code and County storm hazard mitigation policies, shall be issued automatically and all structures suffering major damage will be repaired according to the State Building Code. All structures suffering minor damage, regardless of location, will be allowed to be rebuilt to the ►1:3 LIB original condition prior to the storm. The County Sanitarian and Building Inspector will consider permitting reconstruction (between 30-80% of value of damaged homes requiring a septic tank) on a case by case basis if soil type does meet current septic tank requirements as of the date of damage or the time destruction occurred. 3. Development Moratorium In the event of a category 3 makes landfall in or near Currituck, county officials should consider establishing a building moratorium. Residents shall be allowed to proceed with redevelopment and reconstruction as soon as practical and in accord with the various levels of state and federal disaster relief provided to them. The Disaster Recovery Team will coordinate with the State Department of Insurance and other home construction organizations in assembling a list of qualified contractors interested in assisting with reconstruction. 4. Repair/Reconstruction Schedule The schedule of activities and time frame (Figure 8.3) is proposed with the realistic Idea that many factors of a hurricane may render the schedule infeasible. Repair/Reconstruction Schedule a) Appoint Damage Assessment Committee I b) Complete and Report Damage Assessments I c) Begin Repairs to Critical Utilities and Facilities d) Permitting of Reconstruction activities for all damaged structures ("minor" to pre -storm original status, "major" to State building code and hazard mitigation standards The permitting process for reconstruction will be handled by the Planning and Inspections Department through the mainland office and the satellite office, if possible. Should the satellite office be Inoperable due to damage, a secondary location must be established and announced to the public for their convenience. The alternate location for the mainland office will be the Social Service Building. If damage precludes use of the Social Service Building, an alternate location must be established and the public notified. 79 Time Frame 6 hours after storm Two weeks after storm As soon as possible after storm Two weeks after damage assessments are complete High Priority: a. Primary residences: Applicants must be able to verify residency in Currituck County prior to being issued a permit. A valid drivers license, voter registration card or similar identification will be acceptable proof. b. Critical facilities necessary to conduct the day to day activities in the community. Critical facilities shall include: 1. water plants (public and private systems) 2. sewage facilities 3. electric substations and lines 4. telephone equipment and lines 5. fire and rescue facilities 6. roads 7. schools 8. county offices 9. state facilities 10. airport 11 post offices 12. beach accessways (vehicular) Moderate Priority: 1. health service facilities: doctor's offices and nursing homes 2. other existing businesses 3. farm buildings Low Priority: 1. Second homes (vacation homes) and accessory structures. 2. Unoccupied rental property rented on a monthly or yearly basis. Dwellings having minor damage that will be used to house displaced persons, where a request is made by the American Red Cross may be given a higher priority. Verification must be submitted by the Red Cross. 3. All other vacant buildings. All building permit fees will be waived for all storm damage repairs only. In the event that the damage suffered is more than the county can practicably handle, the Planning and Inspections Department will request that the Board of Commissioners enter into an "Mutual Aid Agreement" with adjacent communities to assist with assessing damage and inspections of repairs. Permits and inspection of buildings will be required in all cases except to replace or repair the following: a. Bona Fide Farm buildings (excluding mechanical, electrical ,and plumbing) b. shingles c. storage buildings that: 1) contain no electric, mechanical, or plumbing, 2) are valued by the Tax Department at less than $3,000.00, and 3) are located outside of flood zones and CAMA AECs. 5. Agency Responsible for Implementation: The Chairman of the Currituck County Board of Commissioners, as chief elected official of the county, will serve as overall Chairman of Control Group. The Board Chairman will delegate the overseeing of the reconstruction and recovery effort and implementation of the plan. 6. Repair and Replacement of Public Utilities and Infrastructure: The Public Works Director and the Health Department Director shall coordinate all activities with the state relating to the repair and replacement of the county water system and the water/sewer system at Ocean Sands and Newtown Road (ail other utilities on the Outer Banks are under private control). The county will work with the State in order to establish a north/south access in the event NC 12 sustains damage. The county will consider the relocating of public infrastructure where changes in natural features warrant relocation. All measures will be taken to assist NC and Virginia Power in providing a swift return of electrical services damaged during a major storm event. Hurricane Evacuation Plan Currituck County has an official "Emergency and Evacuation Plan," which was revised in February, 1989. All activities relating to evacuation shall be coordinated through the Emergency Services Director. A brief review of this plan Indicates that it is adequate to meet the emergency needs of the county. The county should coordinate with surrounding areas for sheltering residents of the county. Introduction The Growth Management Plan establishes a land classification system as a means of helping to attain the goals stated in the land use plan. By showing land classes on a map, Currituck County can specify those areas where certain policies (local, state and federal) will apply. The land classification system is intended to be supported and complemented by zoning, subdivision and other local growth management tools. These local tools should be consistent with the classification system as much as possible. Although specific areas are outlined on a land classification map, it must be remembered that a land classification system is merely a ,tool to help achieve the goals established in the land use plan and not, in the strict sense of the term, a regulatory mechanism such as a zoning map. There are seven different land classifications established in the land use plan. They are: Developed, Urban Transition, Limited Transition, Community, Rural, Rural with Services, and Conservation. This chapter will describe what each of these land classifications represents. In addition, a land classification map has been prepared to indicate preferred development patterns. Land Use Classification Descriptions DEVELOPED Purpose. The purpose of the Developed class is to provide for continued intensive development and redevelopment of existing cities, towns, and their urban environs. Description and Characteristics. Areas meeting the intent of the developed classification are currently urban in character where minimal undeveloped land remains and have in place, or are scheduled for the timely provision of, the usual municipal or public services. Urban In character includes mixed land uses such as residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, and other uses at high to moderate densities. Services include water, sewer, recreational facilities, streets and roads, police and fire protection. In some instances an area may not have all the traditional urban services in place but, If it otherwise has a developed character and is scheduled for the timely provision of these services, it still meets the intent of the developed classification. Areas developed for predominantly residential purposes meet the intent of this classification if they exhibit: 1. a density of 3 or more dwelling units per acre; or, 2. a majority of lots of 15,000 square feet or less, which are provided or scheduled to be provided with the traditional urban services; and/or, 3. permanent population densities are high and seasonal populations may swell significantly. Location.. The Developed land classification can be found in Walnut Island/Waterview SHores in Grandy. This area was designated as such because it is heavily developed, of high density and little property is available. URBAN TRANSITION Purpose. The purpose of the Urban Transition class is to provide for future intensive urban development on lands that are suitable and that will be provided with the necessary urban services to support Intense urban development. Description and Characteristics. Areas meeting the intent of the Urban Transition classification are presently being developed for urban purposes or will be developed in the next five to ten years to accommodate anticipated population and urban growth. These areas are In, or will be in an urban "transition" state of development going from lower intensity uses to higher intensity uses and as such will eventually require urban services. 1. Areas classified Urban Transition will provide lands for intensive urban growth when lands in the developed class are not available. Urban transition lands must be able to support urban development by being generally free of physical limitations and be served or readily served by urban services. Urban development includes mixed land uses such as residential, commercial, institutional, industrial and other uses at or approaching high to moderate densities. Urban services include water, sewer, streets and roads, police and fire protection that will be made available at the time development occurs or soon thereafter. Permanent population densities in this class will be high and the seasonal population may swell significantly. 2. In choosing land for the urban transition class, such land should not include: Areas with severe physical limitations which would make the provision of urban services difficult or impossible, lands which meet the definition of conservation, lands of special value (unless no other alternative exists) such productive and unique agricultural lands, forest lands, potentially valuable mineral deposits, water supply watersheds, scenic and tourist resources including archaeological sites, habitat or important wildlife species, areas subject to frequent flooding, areas important for environmental or scientific values, lands where urban development might destroy or damage natural systems or processes of more than local concern or lands where intense development might result in undue risk to life and property from natural or existing man- made hazards. 3. It should be understood that even though AEC standards occasionally permit urban transition type development on a lot by lot basis within the various AEC's, this classification should generally not be applied to any AEC. 4. Areas that are predominantly residential meet the intent of this class if: a. they are approaching three dwelling units per acre; or, b. a majority of the lots are 15,000 square feet or less and will be provided with essential urban services to support this high density development; or, c. are contiguous to existing developed municipal areas. Location. The Urban Transition area is located in Moyock. It was designated as such due to its proximity to Virginia and the recent completion of a five -lane highway (NC 168) In the community. Chesapeake, Virginia is also planning to widen Highway 168 within the ten-year planning period. LIMITED TRANSITION Purpose. The purpose of the Limited Transition class is to provide for development in areas that will have some services, but are suitable for lower densities than those associated with the Urban transition class, and/or are geographically remote from existing towns and municipalities. Description and Characteristics. Areas meeting the intent of this class will experience increased development during the planning period. They will be in a state of development requiring some municipal type services. These areas are of modest densities and often suitable for RON 1 1 u the provision of closed water systems rather than individual wells. 1. Areas classified Limited Transition will provide controlled development with services, but may not be on lands that are suitable for traditional high intensity urban development normally associated with sewers or other services. These may be lands with physical limitations or areas near valuable estuarine waters or other fragile natural systems. Sewers and other services may be provided because such services are already in the area or readily available nearby, because the lands are unsuitable for septic tanks or cumulative impact of septic tanks may negatively affect significant public resources. Self contained, large, retirement/vacation developments in otherwise rural areas would meet the intent of this class The limited transition class also includes those areas that may not have water and sewer services at this time, but are suitable for higher intensity uses due to frontage along Highways 158/168 and the potential for County water in the near future. 2. The limited transition class is intended for residential development with densities of three units per acre or less, or the majority of lots are 15,000 square feet or greater. Clustering or development associated with Planned Unit Developments and Planned Residential Developments are appropriate in the limited transition class. This class also contains nonresidential areas along major transportation routes. 3. Areas that meet the -definition of conservation class should not be classified limited transition. Location. This designation can be found on the outskirts of Moyock, between Barco to an area just south of Coinjock along 158, from Grandy to the Wright Memorial Bridge on 158 and in approved PUD's (Outer Banks) and in Carova. These areas were chosen due to the availability of water (in most cases), existing land use and zoning, in some cases sewer and road access. It is important to note that along 158/168 it is not intended that the urban transition area be used as strip commercial development. Recommendations in the Transportation Chapter indicate provisions for alleviating problems associated with strip development and advocate a policy of nodal development. NOTE: THIS PROVISION HAS BEEN WRITTEN AS FOUND IN PREVIOUS LAND USE PLAN, THE COUNTY MUST DETERMINE IF IT INTENDS TO FOLLOW A NODAL POLICY. COMMUNITY Purpose. The purpose of the Community class is to provide for clustered, mixed land uses at low densities to help meet the housing, shopping, employment and other needs in rural areas. Description and Characteristics. Areas meeting the intent of the community class are presently developed at low densities that are suitable for private septic tank use. These areas are clustered residential and/or commercial land uses which provide low intensity shopping and housing opportunities, and provide a local social sense of a "community." Very limited municipal type services such as fire -protection and community water may be available, but municipal type sewer systems are not to be provided as a catalyst for future development. In some unusual cases, sewer systems may be possible, but only to correct an existing or projected public health hazard. Areas developed in a low density fashion in small, dispersed clusters in a larger rural landscape with very limited or no water and sewer services meet the intent of this class. Location. The community classification includes Shawboro, 158/SR 1147 intersection, Currituck, Coinjock, Poplar Branch, Sligo and Maple. These areas have small shops, banks, community buildings and churches located within their boundaries. It is intended to promote this type of development that characterizes Currituck's historical development. RK RURAL Purpose. The Rural class is to provide for agriculture, forestry, mineral extraction and other allied uses traditionally associated with an agrarian region. Other land uses, due to their noxious or hazardous nature and negative impacts on adjacent uses may also be appropriate here if sited in a manner that minimizes their negative effect on surrounding land uses or natural resources. Examples include energy generating plants, refining plants, airports, transmission towers, sewage treatment facilities, fuel storage tanks and other industrial type uses. Very low density dispersed residential uses on lots of approximately one unit per acre (in proximity to higher density development) to three units per acre (remote from higher density development) with on site water and sewer are consistent with the intent of the rural class. Development in this class should be as compatible with resource production as possible. Description and Characteristics. Areas meeting the intent of this classification are appropriate for or presently used for agriculture, forestry, mineral extraction, and other uses, that due to their hazardous or noxious nature, should be located in a relatively isolated and undeveloped area. Low density dispersed, single family residential uses at a gross density of approximately one unit per acre (in proximity to higher density development) to three units per acre (remote from higher density development) are also appropriate within rural areas where lot sizes are large and where densities do not require the provision of urban type services. Private septic tanks and wells are the primary on site services available to support residential development, but fire, rescue squad and sheriff protection may also be available. Population densities will be very low. Location. This classification contains a majority of land in Currituck County (next to the Conservation class) from Knotts Island to Point Harbor. These are low density areas that are mostly used for farming and occasionally mining purposes. RURAL WITH SERVICES Purpose. The Rural with Services class is to provide for low density land uses including residential use where limited water services are provided to avert an existing or projected health problem. Development within this class should be low intensity to maintain a rural character. Rural water systems, such as those funded by Farmers Home Administration, are or may be available in these areas due to the need to avert poor water quality problems. These systems, however, should be designed to serve a limited number of customers and should not serve as a catalyst for future higher intensity development. Description and Characteristics. Areas meeting the intent of this class are appropriate for very low intensity residential uses with a gross density of approximately one unit per acre (in proximity to higher density development) to three units per acre (remote from higher density development) where lot sizes are large and where the provision of services will not disrupt the primary rural character of the landscape. Private wells and septic tanks, services such as sheriff protection, rural or volunteer fire protection and emergency rescue, etc., are also available. Location. This area is low density and land is generally used for farming purposes. The rural with services classification is located north of Grandy due to the presence of county water. CONSERVATION Purpose. The purpose of the Conservation class is to provide for the effective long- 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 term management and protection of referred to by the public and elected officials significant, limited or irreplaceable areas. in the day to day decision making process. Management is needed due to the natural, cultural, recreational, scenic or natural productive values of both local and more than local concern. Description and Characteristics. Areas meeting the intent of this classification include: 1. AEC's, including but not limited to public trust waters, estuarine waters, coastal wetlands, etc. as identified in 15 NCAC 7H; 2. Other similar lands, environmentally significant because of their natural role in the integrity of the coastal region, Including, but are not limited to CAMA and 404 wetlands, areas that are or have a high probability of providing wildlife habitat, forest lands that are essentially undeveloped and lands that otherwise contain significant productive, natural, scenic, cultural or recreational resources. Location. Like _the rural classification, the conservation class takes in a vast area of Currituck County. Included in this class are AEC's (excluding lands landward of the applicable Erosion Setback Line), all Federal and State reserves, all swamp and wetlands (coastal and inland), Islands, marshes and other areas where soils are poor for development. If land is developable, it should be done at densities of approximately one unit per three acres or less. and Use Clossiflcotlon Mo The attached map (Figure 9.1) indicates recommended boundaries for each of the seven land us67 classifications. The purpose of this map is to indicate preferred land development patterns over a ten year planning period. As had been alluded to previously, this map is not to be confused with a zoning map that has the force of law. The land use classification map represents desired development patterns and can be Figure 9.1 1996 Currituck County Land Use Plan Classification Map Leggy Developed Urban Transition Limited Transition Community Rural With Services Rural Conservation Ats�antfc agars s= 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ch op ter 10 77771 DRAFT 1 /14/97 Implementation Plan Below is a recommended implementation plan that has been established to help achieve the goals stated in the 1996 Currituck County Land Use Plan. Each strategy listed has been assigned to one or more agencies with a time frame listed on when to project is to begin. Please note that there may be additional strategies not listed in the implementation plan that may help achieve stated goals. It is intended that the Planning Board monitor progress on the implementation plan and advise the Board of Commissioners on making additions or deletions as deemed necessary. GOAL I A : TO ENCOURAGE MAXIMUM PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN THE LAND USE PLANNING PROCESS. Strate , ies: 1. Encourage the use of citizen advisory groups to help formulate policies on land use issues facing the county; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 2. Have all agencies with tasks outlined in the Land Use Plan report on an annual basis to the Planning Board on the status of implementing strategies. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: GOAL 3.1 CONTINUE TO EXPAND THE ECONOMIC BASE OF CURRITUCK COUNTY TO IMPROVE EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES WHILE ENSURING ADEQUATE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. Strategies: 1. The Economic Development Board should continue to focus on strategies to improve economic development in the county allowing input from elected officials, appointed officials and the general public. Strategies should be reviewed periodically and adjusted according to economic conditions. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 2. Recruit industries that will not have a negative impact on Currituck County's fragile environment (i.e., minimal effect on water quality, no excessive smoke and noise, etc.);development in Currituck. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 3. Promote the location of light industrial, wholesale and warehouse operations in the county in areas best suited for such uses. Characteristics of a suitable location include: -transportation facilities are adequate to meet the needs of the use and would not place an undue burden on local roads; -the use is adequately buffered by physical and natural barriers from residential uses and would not detract from the quality of life enjoyed by neighbors; -the use would not detract from the rural character of the area; -the use has adequate access to utilities; -the use does not locate in an area that is environmentally sensitive. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: GOAL 3.2: CONTINUE TO SUPPORT AGRICULTURAL USES IN THOSE AREAS BEST SUITED FOR FARMING AND TO PROMOTE AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES THAT ARE SENSITIVE TO THE ENVIRONMENT. 1. Promote the use of cluster development (Planned Residential Development - PRD, Open Space Subdivisions, Planned Unit Development PUD) in order to preserve the land best suited for farming; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 2. Promote the use of farming Best Management Practices. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: GOAL 3.3: TO CONTINUE TO ALLOW THE EXTRACTION OF MINERALS TO SUPPORT GROWTH PROVIDED EXTRACTION ACTIVITIES HAVE A MINIMUM IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT AND SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. Strateaies: 1. Continue to enforce the Unified Development Ordinance In order to limit potential negative impacts mines may have on the environment and surrounding properties (i.e., drainage, erosion, noise, visual impact, etc.). RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: GOAL 3.4 CONTINUE TO EXPAND THE ROLE TOURISM PLAYS IN CURRITUCK COUNTY. Strategies 1. Continued support of the Currituck Wildlife Museum; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 2. Provide information about Currituck County at the existing state rest stop facility south of Coinjock. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 3. Promote local and regional cooperation in order to enhance tourism. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: GOAL 3.5: MAINTAIN THE ECONOMIC AND HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF COMMERCIAL AND RECREATIONAL FISHING AND HUNTING IN CURRITUCK COUNTY. E a�aL�Z LL-1`� 1. Improve the quality of the sounds and adjoining tributaries; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: ' TIME FRAME: 2. Encourage the preservation of wildlife habitat by promoting cluster development, RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 3. Promote conservation easements allowing a landowner to maintain title to the property but prohibit development of sensitive areas in exchange for financial consideration. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 7 GOAL 3.6: TO ENSURE COMMERCIAL TIMBER HARVESTING IS DONE IN A MANNER THAT HAS MINIMAL IMPACT TO THE ENVIRONMENT. Strateaies: 1. Commercial timber harvesting shall adhere to best management practices established by the North Carolina Forest Service and comply with 404 wetland regulations. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: GOAL 4.1: TO HAVE A TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM THAT EFFECTIVELY, EFFICIENTLY AND SAFELY MOVES MOTORING AND BICYCLE TRAFFIC THROUGHOUT CURRITUCK COUNTY. Strateaies: 1. Continue to work with NCDOT in updating the 1988 Thoroughfare Plan and implemen recommendations from that plan; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 2. Review driveway regulations for effectiveness and determine if they should be Include other important collector roads; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 3. Request that the Department of Transportation widen the following roads to accommodate bicycle traffic: a) Highway 158 from Belcross (Camden County to Barco), b) Along NC 12 on the Currituck Outer Banks, c) On the Mid -County Bridge, d) NC 615 on Knotts Island, e) Highway 168 from the Virginia state line to Barco, f) Tulls Creek Road (SR 1222); RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: extended to 4. Continue implementing recommendations from the US Highway 158 & NC Highway 168 Corridor Plan RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 1� GOAL 4.2 TO PROVIDE FOR TIMELY EVACUATION OF RESIDENTS AND GUESTS ON THE CURRITUCK OUTER BANKS DURING MAJOR STORM EVENTS AND IMPROVE THE ACCESSIBILITY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND AVAILABILITY OF COMMUNITY SERVICES. Strate - ies: 1. Support construction of a mid -county bridge that will have a minimum impact on the e Outer Banks and the Currituck County mainland. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 2. Work with NCDOT and area residents to determine the best transportation alternetives for traffic on the Outer Banks. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: GOAL 4.3 TO ENSURE THE CURRITUCK MID -SOUND BRIDGE HAS MINIMUM IMPACT ON THE CURRITUCK OUTER BANKS AND THE CURRITUCK MAINLAND. Strategies: 1. Complete the water study for the Currituck Outer Banks and take the necessary steps to implement recommendations to ensure adequate water supplies. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 2. Maintain and improve existing public beach and sound accesses on the Currituck Outer ' Banks. Where feasible, acquire new public beach and sound accesses. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 3. Continue to enforce PUD regulations limiting commercial development on the Outer Banks. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 4. Continue to advise residents, contractors, and developers about the benefits of vegetation ' on the Outer Banks. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: ' 5. Currituck County should continue to enforce the Adequate Public Facilties standard and adjust as needed to maintain it's effectiveness. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 6. Limit access from the Currituck Mid -Sound Bridge into local communites on the Currituck Mainland. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 7. Currituck County should continue to encourage developers to use the common open space development standards to better preserve Currituck's fragile environment and rural character. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 8. Currituck County should continue to keep densities low In order to help protect the rural charater of the area. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 9. Approve development where the Currituck Mid -Sound Bridge intersects with US 158 that is of high quality interms of safety and design. 90 RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 10. Assist In promoting Currituck mainland businesses on the Outer Banks once the mid -sound bridge is complete. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: , ' GOAL 4.4: TO PROVIDE A SAFE MEANS OF ACCESS NORTH OF COROLLA THAT WILL HAVE A NEGLIGIBLE IMPACT OMTHE ENVIRONMENT. Strategies: 1. Continue to monitor development on the Currituck Beaches north of Corolla and explore the potential for improving access to the area. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: GOAL 4.5: TO ALLOW THE USE OF OFF -ROAD VEHICLES IN A SAFE AND RESPONSIBLE MANNER ON THE CURRITUCK OUTER BANKS. Strateaies: 1. Continue to enforce the existing Outer Banks Vehicular and Barrier Strand Ordinance. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: GOAL 5.1: ENCOURAGE THE DEVELOPMENT OF'AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN'A MANNER THAT MINIMIZES THE IMPPCT ON SURROUNDING AREAS. Strategy ' 1. Continue the resent mobile home policy of allowing double-wides meeting specific P P Y g g p c appearance criteria by right in all residential zoning districts; allowing Class "B" mobile homes (built after July 1, 1976) in existing mobile home parks and on large lots in limited circumstances and for temporary replacement of a condemned home; and prohibiting class "C" mobile homes (built before July 1, 1976); RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 2. Continue to promote Planned Unit Developments (PUD's), Planned Residential Developments (PRD's) and Open Space Subdivisions. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 3. Explore the need to provide affordable housing` in Currituck County and, if needed, identifiy ' incentives to help encourage the private sector to provide such housing. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 4. Carefully evaluate the impact of existing and proposed development standards (i.e. Adequate Public Facilties regulations, Impact Fees) on providing affordable housing. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 91 GOAL 5.2: TO CONTINUE TO REVITALIZE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS IN ORDER TO PROVIDE SAFE AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR THE RESIDENTS OF CURRITUCK COUNTY. Strategies: 1. Continue particiaption in programs to help rehabilitate substandard housing in Currituck County. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: GOAL 5.3: TO PROHIBIT THE ESTABLISHMENT OF FLOATING HOME DEVELOPMENT Strategies: 1. Maintain provisions in the Unified Development Ordinance that prohibit the use of floating home development. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: GOAL 5.4: TO PERMIT MARINA DEVELOPMENT (INCLUDING MARINAS ASSOCIATED WITH RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS) ONLY WHEN IT CAN CLEARLY BE SHOWN THAT THE MARINA HAS NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON THE PUBLIC TRUST WATERS, ESTUARINE AREAS ,AND SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. Strategies: 1. Enforce the Unified Development Ordinance permitting marinas subject to the following design 4 principles: a) Marinas shall be planned in such a manner as to minimize the risk of water pollution. b) Marinas shall be located in areas where there is a high rate of water "turnover" (the time required for tidal action or water flow to replace water of a boat basin with new water from another source). Ideally, marinas should have a water turnover rate of 2 to 4 days. c) Marinas in upland areas shall be encouraged. d) Marina access channels shall be designed to maximize circulation and avoid dead-end spots. e) Marina designs must incorporate facilities for the proper handling of sewage, waste, and refuse. f) Marinas shall minimize alteration of existing shoreline configurations and disturbance of vital habitat areas. g) Dredging operations shall not occur during critical periods of fish migration and breeding. h) The method of dredging shall be chosen that will have the least environmental impact and, all dredged materials shall be placed in a manner so as not to pollute surrounding areas. i) Proposals for marina development shall be accompanied by a modeling study Indicating expected flushing. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: l TIME FRAME: 2. Permit marinas as an accessory use to residential development. Marinas not associated with residential developments and dry stack storage facilities shall only be permitted in accordance with the Unified Development Ordinance. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: .r 92 r GOAL 5.5: TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF ISLANDS THAT WOULD BEST PROMOTE THE PUBLIC INTERESTS. Strategies 1. Allow island development that complies with the county's zoning regulations; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: r 2. Permit the development of Monkey Island for the purpose of public education or research and related purposes. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: GOAL 5.6: TO PERMIT THE USE OF BULKHEADS FOR STABILIZING NON -OCEAN SHORELINES. Strategies: r 1. Require all bulkhead installations be done according to CAMA regulations. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: t• GOAL 5.7 TO PROTECT THE FRAGILE COASTAL ENVIRONMENT FROM NEGATIVE IMPACTS OF ENERGY FACILITIES. Strategies: 1. Oppose all drilling off the coast of North Carolina and oppose the location of any associated support or processing facilities within Currituck County. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: r` 2. Allow energy generating plants in accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance as long as it is consistent with environmental protection, health, and welfare of the community. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: rGOAL 6.1: TO MAINTAIN AND IMPROVE THE WATER QUALITY IN THE CURRITUCK AND ALBEMARLE SOUNDS. Strategies: 1. Continue participation in state and federal water quality and quantity testing programs to gain a better understanding of influences affecting surface water bodies. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: ' 2. Soil Conservation Service should continue to address water quality issues and if necessary, begin a water quality testing program. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 3. Review results from the Pasquotank River Basin Plan and implement suggested environmental management strategies for improving and maintaining the quality of the Currituck and Albemarle Sounds and associated tributaries where appropriate. r 93 r RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 4. Develop communication channels with southeastern Virginia communities in order to inform them of the status, concerns and programs being undertaken relating to the water quality of the Currituck Sound. GOAL 6.2: TO MAINTAIN THE HIGH QUALITY OF ESTUARINE WATERS AND TO PROMOTE APPROPRIATE DEVELOPMENT ALONG ESTUARINE SHORELINES SO AS NOT TO DEGRADE THE ESTUARINE SYSTEM. GOAL: 6.3 KEEP ALL PUBLIC TRUST WATERS OPEN FOR NAVIGATION INCLUDING THOSE AREAS UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. GOAL 6.4: TO PROTECT COASTAL WETLANDS SO THAT THEY CAN CONTINUE TO SERVE THEIR VITAL FUNCTION IN THE ENVIRONMENT. GOAL 6.5: TO ALLOW LIMITED DEVELOPMENT 1N THE OCEAN HAZARD AREA THAT IS SENSITIVE TO THE FRAGILE ENVIRONMENT. GOAL 6.6: ENSURE ANY DEVELOPMENT OCCURRING 1N SWAMPS IS DONE IN A MANNER THAT MINIMIZES IMPACTS TO VEGETATION AND HYDROLOGY. Strate . ies: 1. Continue to review development proposals for location of 404 and CAMA wetlands. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: GOAL 63: TO PROTECT MARITIME AND PETRIFIED FORESTS FROM ENCROACHING DEVELOPMENT. Strategies: 1. Provide information to homeowners, builders and developers about the benefits of maritime forests. 2. Maintain the Maritime Forest Guidelines in the Unified Development Ordinance. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: GOAL 6.8: TO ENSURE THAT THERE IS CONTINUOUS ACCESS TO AND FROM THE BEACHES NORTH OF COROLLA WHERE NO IMPROVED ROAD EXIST. Strategies: 1. Support a beach nourishment program only for enhancement of beach traffic in the event a north beach access road is not provided and erosion is sufficient to limit access along the beaches. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: GOAL 6.9: TO INSURE DEVELOPMENT IS SENSITIVE TO THE PHYSICAL CONSTRAINTS OF THE LAND. Strategies: 1, Prohibit development requiring sewage treatment on soils that are unsuitable for on site septic systems unless sewerage can be pumped to soils that are suitable. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 2. Continue participating in the National Flood Insurance Program. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 3. Encourage package treatment plants for Planned Unit Developments (PUD's), Planned Residential Developments (PRD's) and Open Space Subdivisions. Use of alternative sewerage disposal systems that are environmentally safe should be encouraged (i.e., constructed wetlands). RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 4. Continue to work with SCS and the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resurces to review drainage and storm water control plans and to verify proposals have been implemented in the field. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 5. Soil Conservation Serice should investigate the feasibility of establishing drainage districts to help maintain existing drainage areas. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: - 6. Continue ordinance provisions requiring the planting of vegetation in developments and to encourage the preservation of existing vegetation, particularly along water bodies. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: GOAL 6.10: TO ENCOURAGE THE PRESERVATION OF SIGNIFICANT HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL SITES. Strategies: 1. County to assist individuals who want to have their structures listed on the National Register. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 2. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural resources to review development plans that require CAMA permits. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 3. Support the Century Farm Family recognition program administered by the Department of Agriculture. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: GOAL 6.11: TO PROMOTE COMMON OPEN SPACE SUBDIVISION DESIGN THAT IS SENSITIVE TO THE NATURAL AND CULTURAL FEATURES OF CURRITUCK COUNTY. Strategies: 95 '. I 1. Monitor common open space design standards for protection of natural and cultural features and adjust as needed. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 2. Use computer mapping to identify primary and secondary conservation areas and make the Information available to the general public. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: GOAL 7.1: TO PROVIDE ENOUGH RECREATIONAL FACILITIES TO MEET THE NEEDS OF ALL CITIZENS AND TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE NATURAL AMENITIES OF CURRITUCK COUNTY. Strate , ies: 1. Continue to establish community recreation areas at existing and new school sites In order to maximize benefits. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 2. The Planning Board and Board of Commissioners should review the recommendations of the Recreation Committee to determine appropriate actions. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 3. Encourage funding of recreational programs through private funds, grants, and public funds (i.e., impact fees); RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 4. Continue to require dedication of land in large developments (20 lots or more) for public purposes and allow the payment of fees instead of dedication where appropriate. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: GOAL 7.2: TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF PUBLIC BEACH, SOUND AND RIVER ACCESSES AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES. Strate , ies: 1. Inventory all potential ocean and sound access points and establish a priority rating for funding as part of a comprehensive recreation program; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 2. Apply for CAMA, WRC (Wildlife Resources Commission) and applicable land and water conservation funds to establish more ocean and sound accesses in the county on the Outer Banks and the mainland; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 3. Establish additional county recreational and boating facilities in Currituck with particular attention to those areas where limited access exists (Knotts Island, Gibbs Woods, Lower Currituck). RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: GOAL 7.3: TO ENSURE THAT SOLID WASTE MATERIALS ARE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND TO ENCOURAGE RECYCLING. G• 1 I 1 [1 I Strategies: 1. Continue participation in the Albemarle Regional Solid Waste Authority; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 2. Comply with provisions of Senate Bill 111 by emphasizing recycling and properly disposing of materials considered to be hazardous. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: GOAL 7.4: TO ENSURE THERE ARE ADEQUATE WATER SUPPLIES THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY. Strategies: 1. Implement the 5 year action plan for the mainland water system that calls for the following: extending the water main to the south end of the county, prepare a study evaluating the quality of raw water within the deep aquifer at Maple to determine the most efficient reverse osmosis system, develop 10 additional wells in the Maple area to maximize production at the existing water plant, and establish a reverse osmosis plant with production capacity of approximately .75 million gallons per day. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 2. Identify the method of disposing salt water brime removed from drinking water during the reverse osmosis process. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 3. Establish policies on water line extension to existing homes and subdivisions. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 4. On the southern Currituck Outer Banks, the county, working with local citizens, should continue to identify future water supplies, look towards interconnecting existing water systems, and work to provide centralized water to those areas that are presently not served by a water system. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 5. Continue to participate in discussions on regionalized water. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: b. Prepare a report outlining the issues involved in adopting wellhead protection regulations for consideration by the Board of Commissioners. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 7. Make sure all developments indicate well locations on their lots and adjoining lots to ensure 100 foot separation from septic systems. GOAL 7.5: TO PROVIDE THE RESIDENTS OF CURRITUCK THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF COUNTY SERVICES AND TO ENSURE THAT ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES ARE AVAILABLE TO MEET CURRENT AND LONG RANGE NEEDS OF THE COUNTY. Strategies: 1. Continue to enforce adequate public facilities standards to properly accommodate growth without adversely affecting the provision of county services 97 RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 2. The county should review it's level of service standards established in the Unified Development Ordinance to ensure they are appropriate for the community. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 3. Currituck should determine if rezoning of property to higher density residential districts needs to be reviewed under the adequate public facilities provisions and adjusts the standards as warranted. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 4. The county and schools system shall periodically review population projections, student projections, the status of existing facilities, and the County Capital Improvement Plan in order to keep the adequate public facilities review timely. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 5. The county should periodically review public sector cost and revenue projections in order to improve financial planning for the provision of county facilities and services. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: 6. The county should pursue state authorization for impact fees and adopt an impact fee ordinance. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: GOAL 8.1: TO ENSURE THE COUNTY CAN EFFECTIVELY HANDLE A MAJOR STORM EVENT IN TERMS OF IMMEDIATE NEEDS AND LONG RANGE RECONSTRUCTION. Strategies: , 1. Emergency Services to educate all agencies involved during major storm events of their proper roles. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: TIME FRAME: Appendix 1 Summary of the 1996 Land Use Plan Citizen Opinion Survey Results A citizen opinion survey was mailed to 789 randomly selected Currituck County residents and property owners in November, 1995. The results form this survey will be used by the Currituck County Planning Board and Board of Commissioners to establish long range policies in the 1996 Land Use Plan consistant with citizen attitudes. With an exceptionally high response rate of 71%, or 553 people, the margin of error for this survey is +/-5%. A summary of the results is listed below. - 68% of the respondents rated Currituck as a good or very good place to live versus 5% who rated it poor or. very poor. - 43% of the respondents indicated continued growth would have a positive or very positive effect on Currituck as a place to live versus 49% who said it would have a negative or very negative effect. - When asked what impact on the quality of life 19 possible actions would have, those rated as having the most positive effect were: Protecting water quality in sounds and rivers (95%) Protection of residential property from negative impacts (88%) Protecting the environment (88%) Making new development pay for it's impact on county services (86%) Improving Highway Safety (81%) Protecting the rural character of Currituck County (80%) L - When asked what type of subdivision respondents would prefer to see built in Currituck County, 62% choose an open space subdivision and 38% chose a conventional subdivision. Determining the level of support for recent development code changes showed the following: Support Do Not Support Developments not exceed ability of Currituck to provide services 84% 8% Increase lot size to 40,000 sq. ft except in Agriculture zone 53% 24% Increase lot size in Agriculture zone to 3 acres 45% 25% Require recreational improvements in developments (i.e. ballfields) 65% 16% - When asked how confident people were that current county regulations would maintain or improve the quality of life in Currituck, 32% said they would and 32% said they would not. - When asked what level of support there was for new development code changes being considered, the results were as follows: Support Do Not Support Require curb & gutter streets in new developments 55% 26% Require sidewalks in new developments 49% 30% Require street lights in new developments 63% 23% Charge new developments impact fees for services 74% 9% - 55% of the respondents felt the county should be more active in improving safety along streets, 44% said the county should maintain its current level of activity, and 2% said the county should be less active. - If the 5-lane highway of NC 168 and US 158 became too overcrowded in the future, 13% of the respondents said NC 168 & US 158 should be widened to a 7-lane highway, 58% said bypass overcrowded roads, and 29% said leave the roads as 5-lane highways. - When asked if new developments should connect local community roads so local traffic can avoid NC 168 & US 158, 59% of the respondents said yes, 24% were not sure, and 17% said no. -62% of the respondents said there were too few recreation areas, 34% said there were the right amount, and 3% said there were too many recreation areas. - When asked if people were willing to pay more taxes or user fees to provide additional recreation areas, 28% said yes, 15% did not know, and 57% said no. - 52% of the respondents said Currituck County o p ty should establish a centralized sewer system, /o 2 didn't know, and 46% of the respondents said the county should not establish a centralized sewer system. - Responses to rating county services were as follows: Good or Neither Good Bad or Very Good or Bad Very Bad Sheriff 59% 29% 12% Trash Collection 38% 30% 32% Schools 56% 35% 9% Recreation 32% 39% 29% Library 65% 27% 8% Fire Protection 58% 28% 14% Emergency Medical Services 64% 25% 11% Government Administration 37% 43% 20% -When asked if it was important for the county to provide water to certain areas, the responses were as follows: Lower Currituck Mainland Yes 53% Don't Know No 34% 13% Gibbs Woods 27% 50% 23% Knotts Island 29% 48% 23% Outer Banks 46% 32% 22% - 82% of the respondents said Currituck County should work with surrounding areas (i.e. Dare, Virginia) to find a regional water source, 17% didn't know, and 1% said the county should not work with surrounding areas to find a regional water source. - 54% of the respondents said the quality of Currituck's environment was better than average, 42% said it was average, and 4% said Currituck's environmental quality was below average. - When asked about the current level of federal, state and local environmental regulations, 16% said there was too much protection of the environment, 58% said there was the right amount of protection, and 26% said there was too little protection. - Support for Currituck County taking action to protect certain resources were as follows: Support Idea Don't Know Do Not Support Trees/Vegetation 72% 17% 11% Surface Water (sounds, rivers) 88% 8% 4% Ground Water 90% 7% 3% Agricultural Land 65% 24% 11% Wildlife Habitat 77% 14% 9% Scenic Roadways 66% 23% 11% - Of the 260 responses to the open-ended question about what else should be done to improve the quality of life in Currituck County, the top three responses were: 1. Minimize or stop development (120/6); 2. Improve law enforcement (10%); and 3. Increase/improve public water service (10%). - Of the 198 responses to the open-ended question about what steps the commissioners should take concerning growth and development, the top three were:1. Minimize/slow/stop development and growth (11%); 2. Provide a public water system (8%); and 3. Require developers to pay impact fees for public services (7%). - Of the 449 responses to the open-ended question "What do you like most about Currituck County", the top three responses were: 1. The rural atmosphere/country living (quite, beauty, relaxed lifestyle) (48%); 2. Beaches/ocean/sound/coast (17%); and 3. The people/community (friends/neighbors) (12%). - Of the 406 to the "What responses open ended question do you like least about Currituck", the top three responses were: 1. Too much growth & development too fast (with poor planning) (170/6); 2. Too much traffic (especially summer weekends) (14.3%); TIED 3. Politics/local government (8%) and 3. Lack of shops and businesses (must drive too far) (80/6). - Of the 345 responses to the open-ended question about what things need to be considered to maintain the high quality of like in Currituck, the top three responses were: TIED 1. The schools/education (10%) and 1. Improving police and law enforcement (prevent drugs, crime) (10%); 2. Safe places/recreation for youths (90/6); and 3. Control/plan growth (70/6). Appendix 1 RESULTS OF THE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION MEETINGS OCTOBER AND NOVEMBER, 1995 INTRODUCTION During the months of October and November, the Planning staff held seven public meetings. The meetings were conducted for the purpose of obtaining public input to assist the Planning Board in preparation of the 1995 Land Use Plan. Below is alist of those meetings: Currituck County Courthouse - October 23, 1995 Gibbs Woods Community Building - October 24, 1995 Lower Currituck Fire Dept. (South Station) - October 26, 1995 Moyock Elementary School -October 30, 1995 Knotts Island Elementary School - November 1, 1995 Griggs Elementary School - November 2, 1995 Corolla, Satellite Office - November 4, 1995 These meetings were attended by over 135 people. At each meeting the public was asked to get into smaller groups. The participants were then asked to respond to the following question: WHAT DOES CURRITUCK COUNTY NEED TO DO IN ORDER TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR ITS CITIZENS DURING THE NEXT TEN YEARS? After allowing sufficient time to answer the question, each Idea generated'was put on a large sheet of paper and hung on the wall. Once all Ideas had been generated, each member of the group was asked to mark his/her five most important ideas. Due to time constraints, not all suggestions were able to be presented. In those cases, participants provided copies of their -comments to .the planning staff for inclusion in this report. (Note: Anyone who wishes to learn more about land use plans can obtain a copy of "An Introduction to Land Use Planning" from the Currituck County Planning and Inspections Department., P.O. Box 70, Currituck, NC 27929, phone #232-3055) UNDERSTANDING THE REPORT In order to make this report meaningful, each suggestion presented by the public was categorized by topic. In all, there are nineteen different topics which are listed in alphabetical order. In some cases, these topics•were further broken down into subtopics. You will notice that after each comment there is a number followed by one or two letters on bold print. The number signifies the amount of votes that idea received within the group in which it was generated. Ideas that do not have a number following them were not presented to the group but were to be included in this report. The letter, or letters as the case may be, identifies what meeting that comment was made. The meeting locations are Identified as follows: CC - Currituck Courthouse G - Griggs Elementary School GW - Gibbs Woods Community Building LC -Lower Currituck Fire Department M - Moyock Elementary School K1- Knotts Island Elementary School CS - Corolla Satellite Office Below is an example of how a comment will be listed in the report. 101 "-The County needs more recreation areas for residents. (5) KI" The (5) KI means the comment was made in Knotts Island and it received 5 votes from the group. In which the Idea was generated. It must be noted that the results of these meetings should not be interpreted to mean that the Idea with the most votes will automatically be an official policy for Currituck County. The number of votes received by a specific idea reflects only that particular group's attitude toward the comment in light of the other comments presented in that group. Those attitudes may not reflect the attitudes of the remainder of the County. The primary purpose of the public meetings was to provide the Planning Board and the Board of Commissioners some foresight Into the thoughts, concerns, and priorities of the people of Currituck County as they relate to land development. Official County policies will be formulated after a thorough review of existing development patterns, future trends, environmental constraints and extensive public input from meetings such as this. RESULTS OF THE PUBLIC MEETING The remainder of this report contains public comments that were received by the Planning and Inspections Department during the seven meetings held In October and November. Community Appearance ROADWAYS • Beautify Hwy 158 and Hwy 168 (clean up "dumps'D (4) M • "Welcome to Knotts Island" at state line and at the Ferry Dock (2) KI • Cut grass along roadways more often (0) KI PROPERTY • Project a more positive community image (abolish billboards, more rural appearance along corridor, require all mobile homes to be in mobile home parks (4) CC • Stop people from dumping trash in Gibbs Woods (2) GW • Improve Image of county (i.e. welcome center in Moyock, Clean up businesses, houses along highway, billboards for county businesses, not just Dare County) (2) M • Provide maintenance/up keep of properties (trash, overgrown, junk vehicles, paint and maintenance of homes (2) G • Welcome center at state line (1) CC • Clean up backyard junkyards (1) G • Clean-up the county by removing dilapidated houses and beautify Currituck (1) CC • Make property owners more responsible for keeping lots trimmed/mowed (1) GW • Landscape entrance at State line (1) KI • Advertising signage to be controlled (lighting, no billboards) (1) CS • Clean up highway corridor of clutter of illegal signs (1) M • Require over grown yards to be mowed (0) KI • Clean up existing mobile home parks (0) G • Enforce current regulations regarding abandoned cars and other eyesores (0) KI • More landscaping/open space sign control to limit Impact of that commercial development (0) G Community FaciilHes COUNTY OFFICES • Provide for full time residents such as school transportation, health department services, full time library, outer banks location for county administrative services (6) CS • Need more office and courtroom space for the Currituck court system and county (3) CC 102 • Improve school plant so it can be used for a shelter (0) KI DMV OFFICE • Establish DMV office in Currituck (4) GW �- DMV office in Currituck (3) GW • Want driver licensee and tags services closer than Elizabeth City (2) GW • DMV office in Moyock (1) GW COMMUNITY ACCESS/PARKS • Create more restroom and scenic picnic areas for the public (2) CC • Boating access in Moyock area, including dredging and clearing of Moyock Creek (2) M. • Provide public boat access for Gibbs Woods (1) GW • Provide waterfront community/public accesses on the mainland (swimming, boating, fishing) (1) CC • Replace public dock at southern end of Knotts Island (1) KI • Greater attention to beaches such as dispersing public beach access/changing facilities and keep beach clean, study vehicle access on beach (1) CS • Boat access to Albemarle Sound in the lower part of the county (1) M • Establish a public boating access in Gibbs Woods (0) GW • Request refuge to provide boat ramp facility with adequate, parking (0) KI • Provide adequate space for bike and Jogging paths (0) CS • Provide roadside picnic/rest areas on Knotts Island (0) KI COMMUNITY POOLS • Community swimming pool properly manned with a lifeguard (0) KI • Control pools because there is water shortage (0) CS BOAT RAMPS • , Establish a public boating facility somewhere along Albemarle Sound (4) LC • Provide community boat ramp with parking spaces (4) KI • Upgrade and landscape public boat ramps (bulkhead, piers, floating dock, trash receptacles, bathroom, emergency phone, paving for parking, maintenance for facility (2) KI DUMP SITES • Sufficient dump site for residents, current one is too small (1) GW • Want manned dump site because we are paying for one (want to be treated like everyone else) (0) GW SENIOR CENTER • Reopen senior citizens room at the school (6) KI • Senior citizens' center on Knott's Island (2) KI MISCELLANEOUS • Vehicle and trailer parking off -road at the Brumley Road ramp (County buy land for ramps/parking) (7) KI • Post office for Gibbs Woods (2) GW • Street lights on Puddin Ridge Rd, up to and including Quail Run (2) M • Develop proper public facilities for visitors to outer banks at the lighthouse such as public restrooms, changing room, and security/maintenance (2) CS • More controlled access to the north beaches - better monitoring (2) CS • Provide convenience center on the outer banks (2) CS • Commissioners should provide more public services before approving any subdivision (i.e. fire, rescue police, garbage) (2) GW • Install golf course in Moyock (1) M A manned library branch with computer access to the Albemarle Regional Library system and with the capability to provide the public access to the Internet (1) KI • Provide cable TV for all rural areas in the county (1) GW • Keep local residents in mind when dealing with tourists and the provision of county services (1) M • Centrally located full service medical facility (1) LC 103 1 • Pursue some other cable TV service on the mainland (0) G • Establish a small emergency care medical clinic (0) M • Request refuge to provide observation areas/blinds for photography and bird watches with handicapped access (0) KI • Convert some public parking Into public tennis courts (better distribution of public parking lots in Whalehead Subdivisfon) (0) CS • Provide cable TV to all county residents Develo ment • Hold tight on current codes that limit intensity of development or lesson (8) CS • Large fees ($10,000 per house) for the developer to pay for each house before occupied (3) CC • Develop outer banks as a residential community, remain as it Is (3) CS • No further development of the preserve areas, no more trade-offs (2) CS • Require developers to be responsible and pay for services that the developments are placing on the county (schools, fire, rescue, etc.) (2) M • Impacts fee of $1000 for every house built by out of state developers/contractors and subcontractors should have to buy $1000 privilege license (1) M • Require street lights and curbing in all subdivisions (1) M • Prohibit private access subdivisions (1) GW • Encourage open space developments (1) M • Less development (i.e. PUDs) (0) CS • Additional services required by new development (0) LC • Allow developers alternatives to development (i.e. common open space subdivisions) to allow people a chance to use their land (0) M • Require developers to install curb and street lights (0) M • Keep subdivisions rural (0) M • Subdivisions of 10 or more lots shall contain a small playground (0) KI • Do not change height restrictions Density & Lot Dimensions 5 ACRES MINIMUM • Increase the lot size to 5 acres throughout the county to limit growth (2) CC • Minimum lot size of 1.5 acres countywide (0) GW • No land restrictions for properties of 5 acres or more for individual property owners (0) GW 3 ACRES MINIMUM • Limit size of new lots to no smaller than 3 acres (7) GW • Minimum lot size in rural areas Increased to 2 to 3 acres (4) GW • Increase all lot sizes throughout County to 3 acres (4) GW • Get rid of 3 acre minimum lot size in A zoning (2) LC • Rescind 3 acre minimum lot size requirement to less than 1 acre (1) LC • Eliminate 3 acre provision since it is unfair LOW DENSITY • Limit the number of lots within subdivisions to maintain small community atmosphere (2) GW • Limit number of lots per subdivision to 20 (2) M • Require smaller lots (1) M • Maintain current minimum lot size (0) CC • Lower Density GENERAL • Consistency and fairness in establishing the same minimum lot size in all zoning districts (2) CC 104 Im 1 1 1 .1 • Developers provide 1 acre of land for public use for every 20 lots (0) GW GENERAL • Better control on drainage Issues and sewage/water supply (4) CS • When ditches are cleaned the culverts should be cleaned also to allow for the flow of the ditches (1) KI • Clear/clean main lead ditches from the highway/roadways for proper drainage (1) KI • More enforcement of unproved drainage onto adjacent properties (0) CS • Establish a master drainage plan county wide (0) CC LOCATION • Improve drainage on the outer banks (4) CS • Better drainage on NC 12 and all other state roads (0) CS MISCELLANEOUS • Good positive commercial growth (5) M • County needs to provide more support for economic development of mainland which will bring better pay and good jobs (4) LC • Solicit businesses to the county to provide employment to county residents (3) M • County needs to be represented on Northeaster Economic Development Commission (3) CC • Establish more commercial areas on mainland highway to keep money here in Currituck (2) CC • County should encourage businesses and commerce to increase the tax base (2) M • Develop a business zoning classification in accordance with the family destination area (2) CS • Attract more hotel/motel operations with conference center (1) CC • More businesses throughout Currituck (1) GW • Recruit privately run prison in Currituck County (1) LC • No more commercial zoning on the outer banks (1) CS • Prohibit fast food chain restaurants (1) CS - • Enhance and aid more businesses on the mainland (0) CC • Attract more golf courses on the mainland (0) CC • Continue as long as we can to keep out fast food places on the outer banks (0) CS • No fast food restaurants • Urge county government to become "business friendly" BUSINESS SERVICES • Need for shopping center(s), small retail businesses and service -related businesses (5) M • More shopping centers and businesses (5) CC • Shopping center In Moyock area (food, hardware stores, drug stores, etc.) (4) M • Build shopping center in Moyock (4) M • Provide more "service" businesses (grocery, hardware, gas stations, variety) in the county (3) CC • Shopping center for Moyock area (1) LC • Doctors and dentist offices (1) LC • More restaurant facilities (0) LC INDUSTRY. • More aggressive attitude toward industrial recruitment (4) M • Attract light industry/business operations which will provide local jobs (4) CC • Bring more industry Into the county (3) GW • Industry in the county to create a better tax base and jobs (2) M 105 'r4- I • Promote Industry but maintain the small community atmosphere (1) GW • Urge elected officials and economic development officials to vigorously seek light industry such as assembly plants that require little or no water F-711W.J111i GENERAL PROTECTION • Maintain natural resources (i.e. wildlife, vegetation, water quality, sea grasses, etc.) (1) CS • Develop a water quality testing system for surface waters (sound, rivers, etc.) and ground water (0) M WILDLIFE • Enforce protection for the wild horse (1) CS • Conserve wildlife, waterways, and farmland in the county (1) M • Areas set aside for wildlife should be left alone, don't change zoning (1) CS • Continue to protect the Corolla wild horses (1) CS • Request the wildlife refuge to rebuild the tower at Marsh Causeway and provide parking (0) KI • Land should be set aside by each new development with sufficient acreage to sustain small herds of horses • Never sell the Audubon Society sanctuary for development • Keep and Protect Corolla wild horses • Proffers charged to new subdivisions assessed based on the Impact that development will have on the protected significant natural resources of the wild Spanish mustangs VEGETATION • Promote natural habitat (plant trees, shrubs, natural to the area (1) CS DUNES • Promote dune protection (educate community, provide programs for establishment of nourishment i.e. branches, Christmas trees) (1) CS • Preserve open areas, dunes, natural areas Education LOCATION • County should plan for growth In Knotts Island and provide adequate schools for growth (2) KI • Build school in lower Currituck as promised Instead of Moyock (1) LC • Have closer schools (0) GW • Build a school in Gibbs Woods (0) GW IMPROVEMENTS • Better school system to prepare our children for the future (4) G • Expand existing schools or build new schools (no temporary units) (3) CC • County must focus on schools, future of county, keep up with technology (3) KI • Create a technical training facility to teach job skills here in Currituck (2) M • Build additional schools and Increase teacher salaries (2) M • Improve school system (limit number of school trailers (1) LC • No trailers at any school (1) M . • Business/school partnership (training to transition the workforce) (1) CC • School representative come to Gibbs Woods on a regular basis and do programs for 3 and 4 year olds (1) GW • Increase funding to school band and Increase recognition of accomplishments (0) M 1 1 1J L I P 106 1 MISCELLANEOUS • Maintain quality of school system (1) M Smaller community schools (1) M Growth SLOW OR STOP GROWTH • Slow growth and stop cutting so many trees (5) GW • Slow growth on Knotts Island (5) KI • Stop growth in Mansfield farms (4) GW • Slow rate of growth in county, especially in Moyock area (3) M • Slow growth (3) G • Slow growth (2) LC • Increase lot sizes to slow down growth (not approve subdivisions unless facilities are there to serve them (i.e. roads, schools, fire/EMS) (2) KI • Slower growth so the county can remain agricultural (0) GW • Slow growth GENERAL • Good positive residential growth throughout county (no low Income housingl) (4) M Allow county to grow, but in accordance with County's Land Use Plan (long range plan) (2) CC • Continue to watch/monitor/control growth (2) LC • Establish a growth plan for the county offices and staff (1) CC • Carefully control growth and Its impact on secondary roads (1) M COUNTY OFFICIALS • The county should have a board or commission to oversee building construction/contractors that fail to provide services to homeowners after home is complete (1) CC • Planning Board and Commissioners need to be consistent and fair in every case and not bend the rules for one and not for another BEACH • Permit system on beach, better control at ramp, effects on dunes, control hang gliding and other commercial businesses on beach (5) CS • Maintain family destination beach (4) CS • Permit fee for nonresidential vehicle use of beach (atv, licensed and unlicensed vehicles) (1) CS iMAINLAND • Assign Gibbs Woods, Moyock or Currituck address rather than Knotts Island (5) GW • Establish Gibbs Woods township (1) GW COUNTY • Better tax base; impact fees (4) G • More jobs in County (3) G • Collect back taxes (2) G • County driveway regulations too restrictive - share driveway access (2) CC • County should spend more money on the northern part of the county (1) GW • County look into control of grasses in sound - bad smell (0) CS ANIMAL CONTROL 107 1 • Limit the number of dogs per house (5) GW • Hunting dogs not permitted (0) CC • Shut hunting dogs up after season and not running in the summer (0) GW • Do something about loose dogs (the ones that chase and get after people (0) GW • More regulations controlling cats (0) M MISCELLANEOUS - • Comprehensive zoning and planning that we stick to that promotes a stress free environment (8) CS • Better response time during power outages (7) GW • No toll fees to call local Virginia numbers from Gibbs Woods (6) GW • More timely delivery of mail (5) GW • Better distribution of public at public beach access (4) CS • Drop long distance calling charges from Gibbs Woods to VA Beach and Knotts Island (4) GW • Immediate pest control (mosquitoes) (3)GW • Inspectors specializing in trades (electrical, mechanical, plumbing, insulation, building) not one Inspector for all inspections (3) CC • Look into Insurance companies dropping people on Knotts Island (in hurricane area) (3) KI • Reduction in taxes for senior citizens (3) CC • High water control on north end of Backwoods Rd (2) M • Land Use Plan adopt recommendations of the Highway Corridor Plan (2) G • Lower insurance rates by increased fire protection (2) CS • Faster response Item from the power company when the power goes out (1) GW • Building codes too restrictive (1) CC • Faster mail service (and have the COUNTY CORRECT its mailing list ... still getting mail from county for address county changedil) (1) GW • Legislation for impact fees to be aid by the developer (1) GW • Better phone service -difficulty in connecting with 800#s (1) GW ' • Lighten up (1) LC • Tax breaks/incentives on parcels less than 10 acres that are currently given to 10 acre or larger parcels (1) • Needsto be a closer relationship between where money is collected and where it is spent (1) CS • Don't use beautification district to add taxes without representation; not use money to put in public facilities (bike path) (0) CS • Continue to improve relations between the outer banks and the mainland (0) CS • Additional supervision on ferry school bus runs (0) KI • Contributions made to Chesapeake and Virginia Beach for the services they provide to the county (0) GW • Give Knotts Island and Gibbs Woods to Virginia Beach (0) GW • Make sure fire insurance companies recognize Blackwater Fire Department in order to provide lower rates (0) GW • Make Currituck County entirely responsible for septic evaluations - no farming out to district health department (0) GW • Mosquito control (0) M • Lower taxes (0) M Housin AFFORDABLE • Affordable senior citizens apartment complex in Moyock (Not Low Income!) (2) M • Developers should be required to provide affordable housing to lower Income persons within their development (2) M GENERAL • Provide "garden apartments" for affordable housing (4) M • More houses, especially apartments, so people do not have to move so far from home (1) M 108 1 1 Allow for any type of housing on individual lots (1) CC • Rest Home/retirement village in the Moyock area (0) M • No new trailer parks in the county (0) M Law Enforcement and Public Safety Police • More police in Gibbs Woods (3) GW • Additional highway patrol during summer months patrolling US 158/NC 168 (2) LC • Increase police protection (2) M • Provide better control of vehicle use on the beach (2) CS • Maintain adequate law enforcement (2)CS • Keep hunters at least 300 ff from houses (2) M • County should double the size of the Sheriff's Department and Increase pay so they can make a living (2) KI • Reduce traffic through residential communities (1) CS • Increase the number of deputies in the county to patrol (1) CC • Developers should be required to incorporate safety features for children (i.e. sidewalks, street lights, etc.) within developments (1) M • Reduce speed limits and have the Highway Patrol patrol Tulls Creek Rd more often (1) M • Convert from Sheriff's Department to Police Department to get more enforcement powers (1) KI • House numbers and Emergency 911 (0) G • Have game wardens patrol area more frequently (0) GW • Enforce noise ordinance (0) GW • Added police protection on outer banks Emergency/Medical Services GENERAL • Paid Fire/EMS for the entire county; treat every area the same (4) KI • Paid Fire/EMS for the entire county; treat every area the same (4) KI • . Upgrade EMS and Fire Dept. services with equipment for which the volunteers are certified and work toward paid staff (3) M • Upgrade EMS and Fire Dept. services with equipment for which the volunteers are certified and work toward paid staff (3) M • Minor emergency medical care facility (2) CC . < County needs to upgrade existing equipment to current EMT status (people have more training than current equipment will allow (2) LC • Need fire protection and more police protection (1) GB • Provide more control of open fires on the beach or not allow them (0) CS • Keep fire services up as area expands (i.e. fire hydrant, staff) (0) CS LOCATION • Recognize fire and rescue on the outer banks for outstanding service to community (3) CS • Maintain adequate EMS services including more life guard staff for beaches (2) CS • Make law so EMS can enforce red flag "no swimming" rule (2) CS • Require permits for 4 wheel drive vehicle on beach property to restrict (1) CS • Bonfire permit on North Beaches (0) CS • Form Gibbs Woods Fire Department (0) GW MISCELLANEOUS • Take moneys earmarked for airport and transfer to EMS funds (1) LC • Leash law for the entire county (including hunting dogs) (1) GB • Restrictions on public/private use of jet skis, atv's, etc. (1) CS • Leash law for dogs for the entire county (0) CC • County should limit how close fishing boats can come to shore like in Dare County (0) CS 109 1 Mid -County Bridge • Support for mid -county bridge (4) LC • No mid -county bridge (3) CS • If bridge comes, set high toll to discourage day users, also provide for passes (3) CS • High toll for mid -county bridge (1) CS • Encourage bridge (0) CS • Do not want mid -county bridge Public Participation & Communication SIGNAGE • Post signs on West Gibbs Road "Children at Play" (1) • Better signage on dunes to inform public how fragile they are (0) COUNTYWIDE INFORMATION • Provide more community/county/state Information to Gibbs Woods (0) GW • County needs to get word out better for people in Knotts Island (Community info board, post office) (0) KI MISCELLANEOUS • Increase frequency of county newsletter to once per month (3) GW • Let people know what is going on (better publicity) (3) G • All adjacent property owners should be notified by mail on all proposed commercial development (2) CC • Televise Commissioners meetings (2) G • Get more people to participate in LUP process (i.e. higher number of mailouts) (1) LC • County get cable channel on outer banks to get word out to visitors (i.e. rip tides; bonfire permit, etc.). (1) CS • Change way commissioners elected; people in township vote for their own representative (1) G • Virginia Pilot needs to get NC section to Knotts Island (1) KI • County take action on plans (0) CS • County personnel expand so they can work more efficiently and coordinate services better; follow-up on long range plans (0) CS • Post ferry schedule at Sandy Point (it was removed) (0) KI • Improve telecommunication services (telephone, cellular, cable (0) CS • Welcome center at State line that will really "sell" Currituck County especially as a retirement place Recreation SPECIFIC TYPES • Improve the recreational areas in the county (movie theater, bowling alley, roller/ice rink) (3) CC • Need for a YMCA type of facility for recreational and family functions (2) M • Need places for recreation, especially for children since they have no place to go (2) M • Provide park areas in the county (2) M • Provide a community recreation area including more accessible boat ramps (2) M • Provide classes (recreation) for adults in the communities (1) M • Additional outdoor recreation facility (unscheduled usage tennis courts, skateboard ramp, area for rollerblading, mountain bike trails, etc. (1) KI • Establishment of bike paths along all major roadways (1) CC • Recreation facilities for younger children (bowling alley, swimming pools, game rooms) (1) LC • Build YMCA for young people (0) CC 110 l • Provide more aviation activities (0) M • Request refuge to provide more trails for walking, biking and horseback riding (0) KI SUBDIVISIONS • Recreation facility in Shingle Landing area (2) M • Establish a recreational department for Gibbs Woods (0) GW • Have Mansfield Farms put in recreation area (ex. swingset) (0) GW SOUND/BEACH ACCESS -SPECIFIC LOCATIONS • Formal recreational committee to run public park at Whalehead Club and other replaces; have organized recreational and educational activities for all citizens of county (use pool at Whalehead Club) (4) CS • More plans made for public recreation of the Whalehead Club property (2) CS • More recreational facilities in Gibbs Woods (1) GW • Children of Knotts Island need county sponsored organized recreation outside school activities (1) KI • Supervised Public recreation areas on Knotts Island (1) KI MISCELLANEOUS • More recreational opportunities for the young people (4) CC • Public recreation facility throughout county (2) M • Centralized recreational area/facility to be utilized by all county citizens (2) LC • More money for schools to supply recreation areas for adults and youth since we do not have a recreation department (2) M • More public recreation (1) CS • User pay commercially operated recreation (1) G • Need more parks and recreation areas and a recreation department (0) CC • Establish recreation committees for the use of county facilities (0) GW • No farris wheels and roller coasters Solid Waste DOOR TO DOOR PICKUP • Provide universal door to door trash collection for the entire county (4) GW • Free door-to-door trash collection for senior citizens (2) CC • Door to door trash collection (2) M • Like to see curb side trash pick-up (0) LC • Door to Door garbage pick up MISCELLANEOUS • Need to evaluate and design a solid waste plan for Currituck outer banks where containers are controlled (days put out, animal and wind resistant, put back when not in use (3) CS • Manned dumpsite (3) GW • Provide adequate recycling services for businesses (1) CS • Improve trash collection (increase size of dumpster and frequency of collection) at public beach access points (0) CS Traffic Lights • Place some traffic lights_ around the county for safety of residents (2) . LC • Stop light at Maple (1) CC • Need stop light on NC 168 at Puddiin Ridge Road (1) M • Need stop light on NC 168 at Puddin Ridge Rd (1) M • Coordinate time of stop lights in Moyock particularly during rush hour (1) M • Provide more traffic lights in the county to permit access on the major highways (1) CC • Stop light at intersection of Knotts Island Road and Marsh Causeway (1) KI 111 • Stop light a Pudding Ridge Rd and any other residential road feeding onto 168/158 (0) M • Need for traffic light at Puddin Ridge Road (0) M BYPASS • By-pass for problem traffic areas (1) M • More loop roads or cross roads connecting secondary roads (0) CC STREET PAVING, SIZE & MAINTENANCE • Highway 12 Improvements for safety and recreational purposes (i.e. widen shoulders of road for bikers, joggers, etc. ) (6) CS • Finish hard -surfacing all roads in Gibbs Woods (5) GW • Pave dirt roads countywide (4) GW • "Fix" Long Lane (3) GW • State needs improvements on causeway (i.e. lights at bridge, clean up roads) (2) KI • Pave all rural dirt roads (2) GW • Pave all roads in Currituck County (2) KI • Pave dirt roads (1) M • Require NC DOT to Improve the maintenance of Tulls Creek Rd (1) M • Grade dirt roads (1) KI • Provide road and bridge connecting the communities of Carova, Knotts Island, and Gibbs Woods (0) GW • Better roadside maintenance (i,e. clearing/cutting ditches by NC DOT (0) GW ROAD WIDENING • Widen US 158 from Barco to Elizabeth City (3) LC • Some roads need to be widened (i.e. Brumley Road) (1) KI • Mandate Virginia to 4-lane Highway 168 and Hwy 17 (0) GW • Provide a wider paved shoulder on the roadways for bike traffic or jogging (0) M • Widen NC 12 to four lanes BRIDGES • Build bridge to connect Gibbs Woods to mainland (8) GW • Work with State to build a bridge to Knotts Island, Carova Beach and Swan Beach (2) CC • Build bridge from Currituck to Knotts Island to Swan Beach/Carova (0) LC • Provide safer bridge area on Marsh Causeway (pull -off area, to prevent safety hazard) (0) KI • Bridge from Swan Beach to Knotts Island (0) G GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS • Problem with intersection of NC 615 and Blackfoot Road shrubs/bushes, high bank on blind curb (5) KI • Relocate NC 615 to Woodleigh Road (2) KI • Road from Corolla to Swan Beach (2) • Provide more routes for evacuation (1) GW • Put Swan Haven Roads on state system (1) KI • Need for a public transportation system (0) LC • Road from Corolla to Swan beach (0) G • Provide an alternative to get out of Puddin Ridge Road (i.e. pave Cooper Garret Road) (0) M MISCELLANEOUS • Snow Goose Lane taken back over by the state (45 people, 14 families) (6) KI • Provide better view (remove shrubs in right-of-way) of Blackfoot Road and Knotts Island Road (3) KI • As developments strip out along major roads, limit curb cuts/driveways (2) CC • Bike paths on NC 615 (2) KI • Street lights, curb and gutter for all new subdivisions at developers expense (2) GW • Street lights at all intersections (Brumley Road, Blackfoot Road, Wards Road, Ferry Dock Road) (1) KI • Name highway 168 and 158 (1) GW • Provide adequate road base, jogging, and bike paths (1) CS • Provide local collector roads to major highways (1) M • Additional ferry runs for students participating in after school activities (1) KI 112 • Establish a Inter -county transportation system whereby you don't have to travel outside county (1) GW • Transportation for students and senior citizens from the ferry to schools and senior citizens facility (0) KI • Provide a setback for fences and shrubs from roads especially at intersections (0) KI • Street lights throughout county (0) M • No road leading from NC 12 into Whalehead (not another access road) (0) CS • Two lane road with less than 45 mile per hour speed limit throughout outer banks • Beach access by 4 wheel drive vehicles allowed only by permit only with the exception of property owners • Old beach access in Ocean Hill should only be allowed to be used in emergencies Ufflitle SEWER • Need for county wide sewer (4) M • • If development occurs, developers should be made to put in sewer treatment systems (3) GW Centralized sewer treatment facility for Moyock (1) M • Sewer treatment facility for the county (1) CC • Establish mini -sewer systems within future subdivisions (0) CC • Start planning for county wide sewer system (0) CC • Sewer system for Gibbs Woods (0) GW • County wide sewer system (0) LC • Need to be thinking about sewage treatment system (developers put in private systems that will be tied together in the future) (0) M • Get land bank for parks and pumping stations for sewage (0) CC WATER • Adequate water and sewer for outer banks (5) CS • Improve quality of county water (5) CC • Provide water to outer banks (4) CS • Need to work with surrounding counties to establish a regional water authority (3) CC • Continue to work with Dare County and Virginia to secure water for the entire county (3) CC • Extend county water to southern part as promised (3) LC • Water in Lower end of county, then sewer (3) G • Create a Gibbs Woods water system (3) GW • Water and sewer for everyone on the outer banks (2) CS • Furnish water to lower Currituck County (2) LC • Establish a centralized water system (1) GW • Analysis of well water and septic systems prior to development of land to ensure no contamination or no wells run dry at developers expense (1) GW • Pursue Lake Gaston Water (1) G • Take steps to maintain and improve water quality In the Currituck Sound and watersheds (1) M • Support Lake Gaston Project (1) LC • Residents need to know where they can get water checked (HD tests only on Doctor's orders) (0) KI • Work with Virginia on a compromise for water to serve needs of Currituck mainland and Outer Banks (0) M • Regional water commission (0) LC • Water use management monitor water usage (0) CS • Expand water system and Improve quality (0) M • Immediate study and resolution of outer banks water problem MISCELLANEOUS • Improve utility repairs (POWER COMPANY) (3) GW Whalehead Club • Continue to control east/west access from Monteray Shores to Whalehead (1) CS • Set.definite time for completion of plan for Whalehead Club, Lighthouse and beach property In terms of recreation and development (1) CS • Pre -planning for events at Whalehead Club, such as parking, traffic, and security (0) CS 113 Relationship .Appendix 2 of LAMA Requirements to the 1990 Gurrituck County Land Use Plan Below Is an outline of information that must be addressed in the 1996 Land Use Plan according to Subchapter 7B - Land Use Planning Guidelines of the Coastal Area Management Act. Appropriate Land Use Plan chapter references, page numbers and goal numbers have been indicated in bold italics after each item required by CAMA guidelines. Please note that items may be addressed directly in a goal or be a specific strategy listed for that goal. Further, the County has established some goals not required by CAMA guidelines but which have been deemed important to maintain a high quality of life in Currituck County. I. Executive Summary (Separate Document) II. Introduction (Chapter 1) III. Data Collection and Analysis A) Establish an information base (incorporated throughout plan) B) Evaluate present conditions ' 1. population and economy (Chapters 2 &3) 2. existing land & water use (Chpater 5) 3. current plans, policies and regulations (Appendix 7) C) Analyze the general suitability of undeveloped land 1. discuss physical limitations for development (Chapter 6) 2. identify fragile areas (Chapter 6) 3. identify areas with resource potential (Chapter 3) D) Determine capacity of County to provide basic community services to meet anticipated demand (i.e., water and sewer plants, transportation, schools, landfills, police & fire protection, bridges, roads, public administrative services) (Chpater 4 for Transportation, Chapter 7 for other facilities) E) Estimate future demand 1. population and economy (Chapter 2 and 3) 2. future land needs (Chapter 5) 3. community facilities and services demand (Chpater 7) ' IV. Policy Statements A) State policies of those land use issues that will affect ' the county during the ten year planning period policies must be consistent B) Resource protection 1. discuss areas of environmental concern (AEC) (pg. 47) 2. policy statements on: a. constraints to development (6.9) b. development issues related to AEC's and Outstanding Resource Waters(6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5) c. protection of wetlands (6.4, 6.6, pg. 55) d. other hazardous or fragile areas (6.6, 6.7, 6.8, 6.10, 6.11) e. protection of water supply (7.4) f. sewage treatment (6.9,) g. storm water run-off (6.1, 6.9) 114 V. h. marina and floating home development (5.3, 5.4) i. industrial Impacts on fragile areas (3.1) J. development of sound and estuarine system islands (5.5) k. restrictions of areas up to five feet above mean high water (6.9) I. upland excavation for marina basins (5.4) m. damage to marshes by bulkhead Installation (5.6) n. water quality problems and measures to protect (6.1, 6.11) C) Resource production and management 1. importance of agriculture, forestry, mining, fisheries, and recreational resources (Chapter 3) 2. policy statements on: a. agricultural lands (3.2) b. commercial forests (3.6) c. existing and potential mineral production areas (3.3) d. commercial and recreational fisheries (3.5) e. off -road vehicles VA 4.5)) f, residential, commercial and industrial impacts on any resource g. peat or phosphate mining impacts on resources (3.3) D) Economic and community development 1. types of development to be encouraged (residential, commercial, Industrial, institutional.) (Chapter 3, 5, and 7_ 2. policy statements on: a. desired industries (pg. 16-17, 3.1) b. provision of services to development (Chapter7) c. growth patterns desired (Chapter 19) d. redevelopment of developed areas (5.1, 5.2) e. commitment to state and federal programs (throughout the plan) f. assistance to channel maintenance and beach nourishment programs (6.3) g. energy facility siting and development (5.7) h. tourism (3.4) I. public beach and waterfront access (4.3) E) Public participation in land use planning (1.1) F) Storm hazard mitigation, post disaster recovery and evacuation plans (Cheater 8) Future Land Use Map Classification (Chppter 9) 1 1 115 -1 WATER SUPPLY PLAN FOR MAINLAND CURRITUCK COUNTY APPROVED BY CURRITUCK COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS DEVELOPED BY CURRITUCK COUNTY WATER SYSTEM Star Route 45 Maple, NC 27956 919-453-2155 WATER SUPERINTENDENT, LELAND GIBBS CURRENT CONDITIONS Currituck County Mainlano Water Department is located in the North p Aibermarle region of North Carolina, The Water Department is bordered to the North by the State of Virginia, the East by Currituck Sound, the South by Dare County, and the West by Camden County. Located in the Albermarle Sound river basin, the Currituck County Mainland water system provides water for a population of 7,280 in 1992. Agriculture drives the economy of Currituck County Mainland Water..The Mainland is supplied water from 18 wells. These wells are between 70 and 200 feet deep and draw water out of the Surficial and Yorktown aquifers. See Exhibit i for locations of service area, wells, and water treatment plant. WATER USE The average annual daily water use for Currituck Mainland in 1992 was .4526 mgd. The maximum monthly average water use was .530 mgd in July. The minimum monthly average water use was .393 mgd in February. The maximum daily water use for 1992 was .617 mgd and occured on May 25. Total water use from Currituck Mainland Water System can be broken down as follows: Residential use- 73.47 Commercial use 19.7 o !nstitutional use- 6.9F 1 71 The largest water user for the Mainland is the Department of Corrections, using 0.0161 mgd. SOURCES Ground Water Suooly, The system has 18 wells for regular use and are located as shown on the map in Exhibit 1. Of these wel Is, five withdraw from the Yorktown aquifer The remainina thirteen withdraw from the Surficial aauifer. The current combined 12 hour yield of the wells is 0.5178 mg. The treatment facility has a capacity of 1.0 mgd. The limiting factor of the water supply system, at this time, is the well output. The following table lists the safe yield, pumping capacity, and averaqe withdrawal for each well. Well Number Weli Yield Ave. Withdrawal Days 1 .024 .013 36-6 2 .030' .0188 366 3 .108 .054 219 4 .022 .011 366 5 .034 01 ;' 366 6 108 .054 219 7 .026 .013 366 8 . ! 08 .054 219 9 .108 .054 219 10 .022 .011 366 11 .044 .022 366 12 .058 .029 366 13 .06 .03 366 14 .108 .054 210 15 .082 .041 366 16 .028 .014 366 17 .028 014 366 18 .028 .014 366 1 117 WASTEWATER DISCHARGE INFORMATION All water service connections are served by septic tank, low pressure pipe or other private wastewater facilities. Currituck Mainland -Water does not operate a County wide wastewater treatment facility. Currituck County has a permit to discharge backwash from the Mainland Water Treatment Plant into drying beds. The permit capacity is .05 mgd and the average annual daily discharge Is .02 mgd. FUTURE CONDITIONS In the future, agriculture will remain the major influence on the economy of Currituck Mainland. The following table shows the projected population and water demand for the years 2000, 2010, and 2020 as well as the current figures. Year 1992 Population 7280 Ave. Day Total .4526 Peak Day .617 2000 9531 .667 .900 2010 1O031 .702 .948 2020 10531 .737 .995 A peak factor of 1.35 was multiplied to the average day total to calculate the peak day amount. Exhibit 2 is a graph of water demands and the total well capacity: it indicates that Currituck Mainland will need a new source in the near future.. Water quality is declining due to high chloride levels in the 5 deep wells, which withdraw from the Yorktown aquifer. We have reached the 12-hour safe yield of the present wells. However, we are adding 2 wells this year and expect to add another 5 wells next year. This will allow adequate supply until about 1997. By that time, a new well field west of the airport should be ready to begin operation. Currituck recognizes the need to develop potential sources of furture supply. Development of another well field in the area's marked A and B will provide for an adequate supply until about the year 2003. An assessment of Mainland Currituck's source water is underway at the present time. IN 1 POTENTIAL SOURCES OF FUTUR SUPPLY Mainland Currituck has two wells which will come on line at the end of 1993. Both are expected to have an average withdrawal of 0.144 mgd each. Currently, a study is underway for constructing five additional wells on the airport property across from the water plant. See attachments 5A and 56. It is expected that these wells will average 0.0216 mgd each and will hopefully be on line in the summer of 1994. FUTURE WASTEWATER DISCHARGE INFORMATION Currently, Currituck Mainland has no plans to provide sewer service. , ASSISTANCE NEEDED Mainland Currituck has received assisitance fromi the Division 4f Water Resources in developing this water supply plan and would like this assistance to continue. Mainland Currituck needs assistance with a water loss and leak detection program. We would also like assistance in locating a source of good quality water in our area. 1 I )19 1"Z ME WATER SUPPLY AND PROJECTED WATER DEMAND jL 1/ 1.03 tj L. u C."', (",\c I ... ..... .. . .... ..... . "14 F, 7 `fir .131 . .......... . .. .......... 4 cp-2 1992 2000 2010 YEAR 2020 •'2����iK'Jfj I I•`` F'/ ��; t!• .(..� :@..�s.. i' ' �+:�"i��:•'1t,Y"'.� h r; j{�,L•�'��I��.t.f..�•i {.)1,^'• ,ti,'fA � �1`: '�Y{. {V1 ;,�.�i,' •r 'i ci;y�!' it + T a�i; ? 1 • '�1'1` l'' "f y1i� }' ly �. ' yb♦'11 r��'� .+�' y1r11%yl 1� `•. �.}I, � ',vj��T{, i �:n� f.h E A. ' jS,S�, i • , / �ti �Tw• . • �i•f ��rj'�i.h � !•r�'S�V /,yy� ` `��� :r., i•�nl �y�'.��r'jl••1'1• ,�t�� J' '• 1 !� ���' f.,;+ 'r• 1>.� ' � ch S c'' �• t.,'tyr. •� f �!i„•P5•�;••'� 5.�, � 1 1 �` �i"ir.` + i•.✓♦§iy, r?.A , ♦. SL;?±!l.iV♦ i.• }1y : i! r'. Q(, � •, r „ f �, � � j 'A;. %j �y1,S. �' r I� %. IS q:+ 5; • t .;a ip. f�:i`i'�i, f r=l�`, r'.. , \ ��tt w �`� ;k.,,l• �' .'t�f0111.{ .T' {r �' ,'r 1' ir• , 5J 1''4 ;, Q � - �+. ! :_. , fl f .r. ' + ll• ..• r�r,rf.� ,; �11'•i'j'r.'•'1 +^• r .j' i1`' 1 r{. .�.i V:, :: t. l.r :v! I,a R• f�`R � ♦ 1 ` h. i ''i � 11 + t, 'r.r; "•�r tit• . , �;'• ��',,•'1► � •. 41V'/'. 1t a1.i •t' i i`f •I ,�t� f `,` t •1\ :�2"�r�'r , ;iut�ly F,1!}':d11.1•'' �,t':'IIV�'t�l .,'� �'~ .'.1 rll.•1'` �•" 1•''" i� .;`I ; i ' � �y�'S• rye) •,y�. jY•�tt•.i ��h.t„s�na+•;A�V`[ ' •,� •+ltl.a r `..r, n ,•r,',:i.ily,,: •'1: 1.; �!•• 4iy �!. ►il,/� 'OB17• � j•, i•• �t•,1 r.' i lit •.1,,. r�t:.� t,;, �. 1 YY r'ii� i ,ph {;: • 1,�•li �r i 1. A.V;. tii '' ► 1� rr' i) �. ty �: ,jrt`.�.�1}}i6� �� .S�,.S��lti'A:��i{�f �r�C: � �•`% ; 51,;;;1.; },.1 ,ate/' ��' ,•,f f`♦. 7 :►^7l . 1 '..'' 'r"'•:1'ira'�t i't�.=r•..%,.�5'I.•:::i i'.M: i•7" 19`► � �':,•') , �' ` :r� ..��t' ,r.:yj1 f', t. tr, ,, `4.,ai � }••.; t,. ,r ' � ` ;t,�. •r 'rl ; l`r:? �, ��;.;,P �1. �t;fl' �, r!j 1':1, iJI"�1;`tilt, o r;.I7 1 1 —•." 4.141••`,�krt'. ,T,+•...I �. 111�• 5N5' 'r"% / `l',. 1/•. ,ri '�i t ` ft• •r1�,1 .• �. .��'�� ?�� ��'���i5�tirt�r���'iy�� '�'" 'i14!'s �•i( �5�'S►'�i�i,(;%'�`i'1', 1 �t "i'{�''; i � � '� � 1'. 1:1, `.' ,tr; t;'. rl y a? 'tiro f,.l'j �•�`. Jt�„i"�1i ,�''v 5y i j' V "r•' � ,41,� �,r fat 1�1•.{' �. ��•r�iS��•(,r;:�' ; "�•i,�t"yq�tr jl: I.�i+:yr�r5lir ,f: l•1• • \ 1. � i. , r ! �j".).•' 1 }� +'i'•'1"' r',�,! 1 Ir h;l•1 : S''''L'i,�i ! a•;ii�ir ... 1 •y . �1�'1: j) r 'j� i'i �..'Ihitj/r •l; �r�i !1i'�'•!'M' + t�'dut•'� �•w•=rl��f 1•� 'j, t �� .yr •,ry.�; fh�`�I i,�•,�"�,1•�;y`• ,l'1�i. I� „i j tll.l jd. r i yl.�� .,9'.:i. •') •j .1 � I,SIi) i•: �' 1 Ili i'(:A r.0 tr S r , , t',; �� i"�..• f,, i•,j ,.�' . ►,'��'•' 1,,'1�: •. �.?�t�/,! '�il ,UrIf�i,�.t ;�:ir��k� t'rl�'� >:�� L�,f f �.:, �i�lry rt,;•.�..t°G ` Sti ; t t1lf, W` 'Pl '••�'�, ".+�1 i ';l;i 4' `ry r} i1��) � 1 !•=•',f;. : Sv; t.,f ;':�'• �'i '.'':�, . . . (1 y' T•, r'' '1'"•'I , r 1• 1i,rr 'tli •,• ,' a.6 �'(� fi1nS �t�'•I: lP) t, .,, .� • •�iyyjj r� `' IRy r,�t;,� 1'i� �, .,,,��:�{' 1�`I j � 1•',:, Ri•'I' �: ;•:1, �1tr1� A if /.�•{`•'i 1'�It jr r ♦ � ,7 I �� '+ ' ' , Y. � 1't• r r,' I '� � 1 �1�. ! i 1' `" ii yl 1,1 1' 1 . .�{. i � N'• � 1 ,H 6 1�' ' f +}'. '{}� �•'i} It' .., '(d �l..5 �; l / '' 1 •<•',«' I / i..,rv; � 1 N � 1 ;'t� ! y1 h Y, 1 �•kt'• •1, Ir'.F,1.11'I}..,:�,3j�(" r �r•�;►, y�'r � V � r r,1,�� , �• � !'• � I�S'ih6.�'jVi �•, ( � �;yl,�,.,♦ �� � •j'��trl' .� Y � 1 J�t !1'•l,I.'��' 1 . R. ��� :: i.11 �li�il'...►,�•..•F.��IS' \• �!}"�: � \ h I • I I : ! !tn �• � i �� "'fir-, ' j � or"1 / ql• /.er.. F� J%`•,\�� �s1O;� + '1,i1 ��J.� . - �\ yam.+.,/ �"~ - � �`.` `� I / I , •'' / • UIA ua Lo ,� i yr! C L%' \� !�� �• ' �•'_- \\CREri7 OIS.IAL SWAMP +� 1! rru i "�� � �., :� •a + — '� �• /�/ ter. �; o..ee.r � — — �� 1 1K ._•: !;IV WELLS AVG DAILY AVG DAILY AVG DAIL CONSUMPTION HRS PUMPED MGD MGD 1990 JAN 7.94 0.29 7.79 FEB 8.69 0.32 7.89 MAR 10.6 0.34 8.5 APR 10.8 0.36 8.6 MAY 12.6 0.4 9.7 JUN 13.39 0.44 10.63 JUL 14.83 0.48 11.4 AUG 14.24 0.46 10.95 SEP 13.8 0.46 11 OCT 13.3 0.43 10.28 NOV 12.1 0.41 12.6 DEC 11.8 0.38 13.1 1991 JAN 11.98 0.39 12.1 FEB 10.94 0.39 12.6 MAR 12.8 0.39 12.4 APR 12.2 0.41 12.9 MAY 14.88 0.48 13.0 JUN 15.16 0.51 12.9 JUL 16.1 0.52 12.4 AUG 15.18 0.49 11.7 SEP 14.8 0.49 12 OCT 14.7 0.48 11.3 NOV 13.6 0.45 10.8 DEC 13.67 0.44 10.7 1992 JAN 12.9 0.416 9.87 FEB 11.84 0.41 9.73 MAR 13.13 0.42 10.1 APR 12.95 0.43 10.3 MAY 14.14 0.46 10.9 JUN 14.95- 0.5 11.9 JUL 15.91 0.51 12.2 AUG 15.28 0.49 11.6 SEP 14.5 -0.48 11.5 OCT 13.69 0.44 10.6 NOV 12.7 0.42 10.1 DEC 13.25 0.43 10.2 1993 JAN 13.4 0.43 10.6 FEB 11.9 0.42 10.2 MAR 13.53 0.44 10.4 APR 13.63 0.45 10.8 MAY 15.36 0.5 11.7 JUN 15.6 0.54 12.9 JUL 17.2 0.54 13 AUG SEP OCT NOV 12,y DEC AVG DAILY HIRS PUMPED Lul 4 0. 13 ................... ... ....... ............................. ................. .... .. . ....... .. ...... tL12 cro .... ... ... 0:11 .... .... .... .... ...... . . ... . ... ....... }10....... ..... ....................... .......... ....... 9 ...... ........... ....................... . .............................. ........................................................... . ....... . J A m - i i i m tj n v A V ';;Q 9: Dm t a I', , i' R M 't� Ll A U 199D-IM AVG DAILY CONSUMPTION! 0.6 70.4 0 0.2. AN JUNNOV �"d FEB JUL DEC MAY OV APR 1990-1993 TOTAL GALS PUMPED AVG MONTHLY ................... ........... .... ....... . ........ .. . .... ...... . ... .. ..... . ......... . .......... ...... .. ........ ...... IfS.% ........................................................................ ............. ........................................ ............... J A N JUN Nib V­ APR FEB llUz WE ICI I MAY 199D- 1993 @v 8/17/93 curwelev SHALLOW DEEP WELLS WELLS CAPACITY CAPACITY 13 5 SHALLOW WELL= 30GPM= 21600 GPD 2808W DEEP WELL=75GPM= 720DO GPD 270000 CURRENT WELLFIELD CAPACITY= 5W,000GPD(12 HRS PUMPING) connect new per cent pop. total at yr end connect change 2.6 peop DEMAND per cones gpd 1991 2692 6999 480131 1992 2769 77 3% 7199 493851 1993 2869 100 4% 7459 522130 1994 3004 135 5% 7810 546728 1995 3179 175 6% 8265 57M 1996 3354 175 6% 8720 610400 1997 3529 175 5% 9175 642250 1998 3704 175 5% 9630 67410D 1999 3879 175 5% 10085 7D5950 20DO 4054 175 5% 10540 737800 2001 4229 175 4% 10995 769650 2002 4404 175 4% 11450 801500 2003 4579 175 4% 11905 833350 2004 4754 175 4% 12360 865200 2005 4929 175 4% 12815 897050 WELLS VS CONSUMPTION 9000m ............................ -. v00000 ......................... N - 060m............................................. ¢,,00000......................................... a000ao 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 s DEMAND 13 WELLS--] I . 2,5- TOTAL NEW CAPACITY WELLS GPD Sol# sell IM li AQUIFER WATER REMOVAL HISTORY NOV. 1989 - JUNE 30, 1993 Total gallons pumped from lower aquifer: Total gallons pumped from upper aquifer: Total gallons pumped from the Maple site: JULY 1, 1992 - JUNE 30, 1993 Total gallons pumped from lower aquifer: i otal iiai ions purnped from upper dgUifer: Total gallons pumped from the Maple site: JUNE 30, 1993 WELL PP'ODUCTiO14 1. 4, , 19,100 '' 0 `' Gil _ . 1 1534,Z 0 4. 4,961,100 5. 55';Jt8,�,00 6. 1 5, 1 45, 1 00 ?. 5,'-05,100 U. 19 970,000 '�. 20,031,600 10. 5,410,400 11. 7,8G 1,900 12. 1 "2,276,600 13. 1,741,200 14. r,248,000 15. 15,677,1 00 16. ..3,731,400 17. r-, n ,1,39,300 18. 73,200 Total 16 ,644,700 235,991,700 327.090.800 563,082,500 7 '?, ,00 95, 70 7.000 168,t-544,700 iiETE^' P`EADING 17,418,500 2'� i, l 38,800 54,102,000 16,765,700 22,064,700 56,287,700 18,199,700 61,134,600 45,807),200 1 7,569,100 1.50,132,400 42,396,000 42,081,000 18,664,000 49,794,300 11,514,000 17,711,500 563,062,500 us =x=MMxMi, APPENDIX # 4 CURRITUCK COUNTY BOAT ACCESS AND RECREATION AREAS Name and Acreage. 'Boat Launch Ramp Parking Comments Iacsflm iTndeveioQed hnpvvec! C�arnec�r 1 !. 1. Brumley Road, X SR 1257. Road End; road KnotisLstnidparking only 2. Coinjock NC WRC Access 5 X 30 Boat launch. inaccessible AM when tmound is saturated tv 3. Corolla Sound Access Area. 5 30 car . Handicapped accessible NMM 9 RV 4. Currituck County Tennis Courts, Currituek County High Banco (Joint use by County and School %TAem) Sd1W 5. Currituck County Softball Fields. Behind Knapp Jr. High C urthu9c (Knapp Jr. HiM Three ball fields 6. End of SR 1106. Swimming -Sound access Fu{Hat w 7. Indian Creek. X 6-8 Canoe/cartop boat launch S d4kmrm FM 8. Newberns Landing X 6-8 Dirt road. shallow draft Nodh Myer. Prwvclls Point 9. Northwest River Game Land, 1251 Hunting and fishing NWET' . 10. North River Game Land. 8430 Bear Preserve - no access C1n"NCMW Swann Name and Acreage. Boat Launch Ramp Parking Comments loa dm UndePeloped In uDyei Qu>a�iv PUBLIC - Cont. 11. Mackay Island 700 ? Access from Knotts Island. Wildlife Refuge (1) natural trail; and. (1) hiking trail. Interpretative programs. hunt ing/flshIng. 12. Monkey Island 12 Access by water only. It has been proposed that the island be set up as a natural/ cultural resoune center N 13. Maple Airstrip leased by County from State (gyp BWY 156&SR 1246 of NC 14. Midway Marina. Coiniock - docking and dockside services on Intracoastal Waterway 15. Poplar Branch NC WRC 4 A msAna X 20 (10) boat slips, boat launch ra= U=M local use 16. Whalehead Beach Accessways Approx. 30 (4) walkways are handicapped Dolphin Street, Marlin Street, per ramp accessible beach accessways Sailfish Street. Coral Street. within two Bonito Street. Mackerel Street, blocks of Perch Street, Herring Street. each walkway Barracuda Street. Sturgeon Street_ and Tura Street 17. Whakbeatd a%Md Ass X At the Whak-bead Club 18. PRIVATELY OWNED - jQ=O=d 1 The Anchor. X 100 Approx. 100 camp sites HWY615 Kn�tfslslar d Private Christian Camp 19. Barnes Marina & Camp. KrnlisWard X 10 ML �, fir 1% dlm� s4 OW EAU a$ Name and Acreage. Boat Launch Ramp Parking Comments Lamm Improved Q PRIVATELY OWNED - (Campgrounds - con't.) 20. Bay Villa Marina & Camp. ? Knottsis]" 21. BeU!s Island 14 X 40 150 campsites; other private Ord facillttes 22. Currituck Campshores Resort. 75 X ? Tennis, swimming. boating SAY (suPm!Td r e.) 23. Hampton Lodge Campground. 110 (2) 200+ 200 campsites, recreation. 24. Sandy Point Resort. X 300 300 tent sites. plus 54 with N HWY615,KnoltsL4and full hookups PRIVATELY OWNED - (Landings / Marinas / Sports) 25. Coilljock Esso and Gulf Marinas - docking and dockside services on Intracoastal Waterway 26. Currituck Sports. X 9 Boat ramp. Coinjock Bay Mk access 27. Tulls Bay Marina. 3 Ma�[ic X 10 - 15 10 - 12 slips 28. Pine Island Racquet Club. CwAa 15 - 20 Indoor tennis and racquet ball 29. Williams Lodge. Krndshh-d X ? SR 1260. Road end 30. Walnut Island Restaurant & Hotel X 20 Boats for rent. fishing and huniLng 31. Riveria Lodge, S. X 10 - 15 Access to North River and Intracoastal Waterway Appendix 5 STATUS OF THE 1-9g0 LAND USE PLAN GOALS AND STRATEGIES Below Is the five year work program and current status for the goals and strategies established in the 1990 Land Use Plan for Currituck County. Each strategy listed was assigned to one or more agencies for Implementation. All strategies had a recommended time frame listed for completion. ' ONGOING PROGRAMS Encourage the use of citizen advisory groups to help formulate policies on land use issues facing the county; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners Have all agencies with tasks outlined in the Land Use Plan report on an annual basis to the Planning and Zoning Commission on the status of implementing strategies; RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Agricultural Extension Office, Soil Conservation Service, Health Department, and Emergency Services Appointments to Boards, Commissions and Advisory Groups should be bipartisan and represent all age groups, geographical locations and racial make-up of the County. ' RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners Recruit only those industries that will not have a negative impact on Currituck County's fragile ' environment (i.e., minimal effect on water quality, no excessive smoke and noise, etc.); RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Economic Development Authority/Coordinator Have the Board of Adjustment issue conditional use permits for heavy industry uses and request disclosure from the industries on environmental impacts and hazardous materials to be used; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Adjustment ' Involve the Planning Department in promoting economic development in Currituck. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Planning Department Promote the use of cluster development ,(Planned Residential Development - PRD, Open Space Subdivisions, Planned Unit Development - PUD) in order to preserve the land best suited for farming; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners Encourage the preservation of wildlife habitat by promoting cluster development; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department Promote the use of Best Management Practices and to encourage less dependence on chemicals. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Soil Conservation Service Commercial timber harvesting shall adhere to best management practices established by the North Carolina Forest Service and comply with 404 wetland regulations. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: North Carolina Forest Service and Corps of Engineers Implement the recommendations listed in the 1988 Thoroughfare Plan; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: North Carolina Department of Transportation 130 Request that the Department of Transportation widen the following roads to accommodate bicycle traffic: a) Highway 158 from Belcross (Camden County to Barco, b) Along NC 12 on the Currituck Outer Banks, c) On the Mid -County Bridge, d) NC 615 on Knotts Island, e) Highway 168 from the Virginia state line to Barco, f ) Tuils Creek Road (SR 1222); RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners Request the Board of Transportation make site specific improvements on Highway 168 (i.e., left turn lanes, deceleration lanes, stop lights, etc.) until roadway is widened in accordance with the Transportation Improvement Plan. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners Continue nodal development patterns along the Highway 158/168 corridor. This strategy should be reviewed after completion of a corridor study. Recommendations from that study should be considered for implementation; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners Support construction of a mid -county bridge in the next five years; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners Continue to enforce the existing Outer Banks Vehicular and Barrier Strand Ordinance. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners Carry -out the recommendations established in the Airport Master Plan. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners and Airport Authority Keep the minimum lot size for conventional subdivisions in Currituck County at 30,000 square feet except in the RO1 zoning district where the minimum lot size is 40,000 square feet and R02 zoning district where the minimum lot size is 120,000 square feet (excluding PUD's and PRD's); RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners Encourage cluster development by continuing to utilize existing Planned Unit Development (PUD), Planned Residential Development (PRD) and Open Space Subdivision regulations. Require open space to include usable land and discourage undesirable development patterns such as high density PRD's and PUD's in remote areas without proper infrastructure; Continue the present mobile home policy of allowing double-wides meeting specific appearance criteria by right in all residential zoning districts; allowing Class "B" mobile homes (built after July 1, 1976) in existing mobile home parks and on large lots In limited circumstances and for temporary replacement of a condemned home; and prohibiting class "C" mobile homes (built before July 1, 1976); Continue to promote Planned Unit Developments (PUD's), Planned Residential Developments (PRD's) and Open Space Subdivisions. Continue to work with Division of Land Resources and the Division of Environmental Management in reviewing and implementing erosion control plans and storm water control plans, respectively; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department and Soil Conservation Service Continue to apply for CAM& Wildlife Resources and related grants for ocean and sound accesses, boat ramps, piers, navigational dredging and the like. 131 1 RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department Make sure all developments indicate well locations on their lot and adjoining lots to ensure 100 foot separation from septic systems; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department and Health Department Maintain provisions in the Unified Development Ordinance that prohibit the use of floating home development. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department Permit marinas as an accessory use to residential development. Marinas not associated with residential developments and dry stack storage facilities shall only be permitted in accordance with the Unified Development Ordinance. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department Allow island development that complies with the County's zoning regulations; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners Permit the development of Monkey Island for the purpose of public education or research and related purposes. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners and Board of Education Require all bulkhead installations be done in accordance with CAMA regulations. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Inspection Department and Division of Coastal Management Oppose all drilling off the coast of North Carolina and oppose the location of any associated support or processing facilities within Currituck County; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners Allow energy generating plants in accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners ' Continue to oppose discharges from water and wastewater treatment facilities; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners Continue to review development proposals for location of 404 and CAMA wetlands. ' RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department Support a beach nourishment program only for enhancement of beach traffic in the event a north ' beach access road Is not provided and erosion is sufficient enough to limit access along the beaches. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners Prohibit development requiring sewage treatment on soils that are unsuitable for on site septic P q 9 g P systems unless sewerage can be pumped to soils that are suitable; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Health Department Continue participating in the National Flood Insurance Program; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Inspection Department 132 Encourage package treatment plants for Planned Unit Developments (PUD's), Planned Residential Developments (PRD's) and Open Space Subdivisions. Use of alternative sewerage disposal disposal systems that are environmentally safe should be encouraged (i.e. constructed wetlands); RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Planning and Zoning Commission and Board of Commissioners Encourage funding of recreational programs through private funds, grants and public funds (i.e., Impact fees); RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Parks and Recreation Department Continue to require dedication of land In large developments (20 lots or more) for public purposes and allow the payment of fees in lieu of dedication where appropriate. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Planning and Zoning Commission and Board of Commissioners Establish additional County recreational and boating facilities in Currituck: RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department Support a regional waste facility; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: County Manager's Office Comply with provisions of Senate Bill 111 by emphasizing recycling and properly disposing of materials considered hazardous. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners Implement the recommendations contained in the Mainland Water Facilities Phase II/III Study prepared by Black and Veatch in 1989; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners TIME FRAME: Complete installation by 2010 Continue to support underwater power lines. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners County to assist individuals who want to have their structures listed on the National Register, RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources (DEHNR) to review development plans that require CAMA permits; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: DEHNR Support the Century Farm Family recognition program administered by the Department of Agriculture. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Agricultural Extension Office Emergency Services to educate all agencies involved during major storm events of their proper roles. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY Emergency Services Planning Department to inform residents of housing rehabilitation and new housing construction programs. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department 1991 Request the state to re-evaluate the stream classification of the Currituck Sound and associated tributaries to see if they warrant upgrading, thereby affording a higher level of protection by the state. 133 1 (note: the Currituck Sound and associated tributaries were last evaluated by the state In 1961 at which time they were classified as "SC" waters. This designation affords the least amount of protection with respect to allowable discharges); RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners TIME FRAME: (COMPLETED;THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS PASSED A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE STATE TO RE-EVALUATE THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE CURRITUCK SOUND AND ASSOCIATED TRIBUTARIES ON JULY 2, 1990. THE STATE DETERMINED NOT TO RECLASSIFY THE CURRITUCK SOUND AND -ASSOCIATED TRIBUTARIES. ' Establish a system to ensure all elderly and financially disadvantaged residents in Currituck County have access to transportation; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners to establish agency TIME FRAME: 1991 (COMPLETED) Operate satellite County offices as needed on the Currituck Outer Banks. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: County Manager's Office TIME FRAME: 1991 (COMPLETED) Establish an economic development authority in order to formalize a plan for expanding the economic base of Currituck County; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners to appoint TIME FRAME: 1991 (COMPLETED) ' Amend the Unified Development Ordinance to limit the negative Impacts mines have on the environment and surrounding properties (Le., drainage, erosion, noise, visual impact, etc.) and allow timely enforcement by the County in the event of violations, RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department TIME FRAME: 1991 (COMPLETED) Request the State provide a manned information center on NC 168 just south of the Virginia state line at the time the roadway is expanded; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners TIME FRAME: 1991 (COMPLETED) iProvide information about Currituck County at the existing State rest stop facility south of Coinjock. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: County Manager's Office TIME FRAME: 1991 (COMPLETED) Amend the Unified Development Ordinance in order to establish regulations for driveways on 9 Y individual property and within subdivisions; ' , RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department TIME FRAME: 1991 (REFERRED TO THE HIGHWAY CORRIDOR COMMITTEE; WAS INCLUDED IN THE HIGHWAY CORRIDOR PLAN; THE CURRITUCK COUNTY PLANNING BOARD WILL BE CONSIDERING A DRIVEWAY ORDINANCE) Appoint an Airport Authority to oversee the operation of the airport, RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners ' TIME FRAME: 1991 (COMPLETED) Remove residential development from the list of permitted uses in the LM "Light Manufacturing" and HM "Heavy Manufacturing" zoning district; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department TIME FRAME: 1991 (COMPLETED) 134 Amend the Unified Development Ordinance to encourage the use of proper design principles when developing residential subdivisions and to minimize the number of curb cuts along state maintained roads. Consideration should be given to providing Incentives for excellence in design. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department TIME FRAME: 1991 (COMPLETED) Continue infrastructure improvement efforts in Newtown, Moyock Township; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Albemarle Commission TIME FRAME: 1991 (COMPLETED) All residential lots shall have 125 foot of frontage along streets except in Planned Unit Developments, Planned Residential Developments, and Open Space Developments. Further, all commercial lots shall have a minimum road frontage of 200 feet; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department TIME FRAME: 1991 (ORIGINALLY WAS NOT ADOPTED AS PART OF THE UDO UPDATE IN 1992. IT WAS DETERMINED THAT WIDER LOT WIDTHS WOULD REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PAVING WHICH IN TURN WOULD INCREASE RUNOFF AND CONSTRUCTION COSTS. THE DRAWBACKS OF INCREASING LOT WIDTHS OUTWEIGHED THE BENEFITS. HOWEVER, IN FEBRUARY OF 1995 THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS INCREASED LOT WIDTHS TO 125' FOR CONVENTIONAL SUBDIVISIONS AT THE TO REDUCE DENSITY IN THE COUNTY) Amend the Unified Development Ordinance to permit marinas subject to established design principles such as the following: a) Marinas shall be planned in such a manner as to minimize the risk of water pollution. b) Marinas shall be located in areas where there is a high rate of water "turnover" (the time required for tidal action or water flow to replace water of a boat basin with new water from another source). Ideally, marinas should have a water turnover rate of 2 to 4 days. c) Marinas In upland areas shall be encouraged. d) Marina access channels shall be designed to maximize circulation and avoid dead-end spots. e) Marina designs must incorporate facilities for the proper handling of sewage, waste and refuse. f) Marinas shall minimize alteration of existing shoreline configurations and disturbance of vital habitat areas. g) Dredging operations shall not occur during critical periods of fish migration and breeding. h) The method of dredging shall be chosen that will have the least environmental impact and all dredged materials shall be placed in a manner so as not to pollute surrounding areas. i) Proposals for marina development shall be accompanied by a modeling study Indicating expected flushing; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department TIME FRAME: 1991 (COMPLETED) Develop procedures for County review of drainage and storm water control plans and establish a system to verify plans have been implemented in the field; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department, County Engineer and Soil Conservation Service TIME FRAME: 1991 (IMPLEMENTED - PLANS SENT TO SCS OFFICE FOR REVIEW AND ON -SITE INSPECTION) Continue ordinance provisions requiring the planting of vegetation in developments and to encourage the preservation of existing vegetation, particularly along water bodies. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department TIME FRAME: 1991 (COMPLETED) 135 1 f ' ' 1 r... 1 Establish a Recreation Committee to assess the recreational needs of Currituck County and to make recommendations for developing a county -wide comprehensive recreational program; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners to appoint TIME FRAME: 1991 (COMPLETED) The County shall identify sites for the jail facility, social services building and Senior Citizens Center, RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners TIME FRAME: 1991 (COMPLETED) The County shall proceed with finalizing plans and establishing a location for an administrative ' building; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners TIME FRAME: 1991 (COMPLETED) ' Develop communication channels with southeastern Virginia communities in order to inform them of the status, concerns and programs being undertaken relating to the water quality of the Currituck Sound; ' RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Planning and Zoning Commission and Board of Commissioners TIME FRAME: 1991 (IMPLEMENTED - PLANNING STAFF HAS BEEN IN CONTACT WITH CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA BEACH AND THE SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION) Board of Commissioners to keep in touch annually with North Carolina Power and Virginia Power to assess the best way to service the Outer Banks and upgrade facilities; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners" TIME FRAME: 1991 -1995 (COMMUNICATIONS ARE ONGOING) Prepare a highway corridor study for the purpose of identifying measures that will promote economic development and safe and efficient traffic movement along Highway 158/168. The report should also contain recommendations for improving the appearance of the Highway 158/168 corridor. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department TIME FRAME: 1991-1992 (COMPLETED IN 1994; IMPLEMENTATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS ARE NOW UNDERWAY) 1992 The County shall prepare a capital improvements plan to guide the expansion of all county facilities; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners TIME FRAME: 1992 (FINANCE DEPARTMENT HAS IDENTIFIED COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS. SCHOOL BOARD HAS ALSO IDENTIFIED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS. ) Review results from the Albemarle Pamlico Estuary Study (APES) and implement suggested environmental management strategies for improving and maintaining the quality of the Currituck Sound and associated tributaries where appropriate; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department TIME FRAME: 1992 (COMPLETED; NO ADJUSTMENTS WERE MADE) ' Establish a Parks and Recreation Department to implement recommendations of the Recreation Committee; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners TIME FRAME: 1992 (RECREATION REPORT FINALIZED IN MARCH 1993. THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS DETERMINED NOT TO CREATE A RECREATION DEPARTMENT. INSTEAD, THE EXISTING COMMUNITY 136 l ('�n SCHOOLS PROGRAM WILL COORDINATE RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES; IN OCTOBER OF 1995, BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS BEGAN REVIEWING RECREATIONAL OPTIONS) Amend the Unified Development Ordinance to allow greater flexibility in the design of multi -family housing; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department TIME FRAME: 1992 (COMPLETED) Hire an economic development coordinator to promote economic development and carry out the plans adopted by the Economic Development Authority; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners TIME FRAME: 1992 (COMPLETED) Prepare an access feasibility study for areas north of Corolla addressing both short range and long range needs which addresses the following: a) identify issues relating to north beach access; b) review historical developments of access to northern beaches; c) analyze growth trends of the northern beaches; and, d) identify available alternatives. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department TIME FRAME: 1992-1993 (IN PROGRESS. PROPERTY TITLE SEARCH HAS BEEN COMPLETED FOR STATE/NONPROFIT LANDS NORTH OF COROLLA. BUILDING /SUBDIVISION DATA THROUGH 1994 IS COMPLETE. REPORT TO PLANNING BOARD IN 1996) Explore the options available for centralized sewer systems within developments and make the information available to the development community; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department and Health Department TIME FRAME: 1992 (INFORMATION ON NEWTOWN ROAD SEWER SYSTEM TO IS AVAILABLE TO DEVELOPERS) The Unified Development Ordinance should be amended to promote hierarchical street patterns based on traffic function and proper setting for residential neighborhoods; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department TIME FRAME: 1992 (CURRENT UDO PROVISIONS HAVE BEEN DEEMED ACCEPTABLE) Delineate boundaries of maritime forests and establish regulations for their protection instead of guidelines; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department and North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources TIME FRAME: 1992 (MARITIME FOREST MAPPING HAS BEEN COMPLETED. THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS DECIDED TO KEEP THE MARITIME FOREST GUIDELINES IN 1993 INSTEAD OF REGULATIONS SINCE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS HAVE BEEN COMPLYING WITH RECOMMENDATIONS) Inventory all potential ocean and sound access points and establish a priority rating for funding as part of a comprehensive recreation program; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Recreation Committee TIME FRAME: 1992 (THE RECREATION REPORT DID NOT CONTAIN RECOMMENDATIONS ON POTENTIAL OCEAN AND SOUND ACCESSES) Establish a solid waste task force committee to formulate a long range plan addressing the disposal of solid waste in Currituck County; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners to make appointments TIME FRAME: 1992 (COUNTY HAS JOINED A REGIONAL WASTE AUTHORITY TO ADDRESS SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL) 137 j Apply for a grant to rehabilitate homes in Newtown, Moyock Township; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Albemarle Commission TIME FRAME: 1992-1993 (INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS TO ROAD AND SEWER WERE COMPLETED IN LATE 1992. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS HAVE ELECTED TO NOT PURSUE HOUSING REHAB. GRANTS IN THE NEWTOWN AREA AT THIS TIME) 1993 A long range facilities plan shall be prepared for Currituck County schools. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners ' TIME FRAME: 1993 (COMPLETED) Establish an impact fee system to have new development help offset the cost of expanding community facilities attributed to that development, RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department TIME FRAME: 1993-1994 (INFORMATION HAS BEEN COLLECTED ON IMPACT FEES FROM ACROSS THE COUNTRY. IN 1995, THE COUNTY'S REQUEST FOR STATE AUTHORIZATION TO ENACT IMPACT FEES WAS NOT INTRODUCED IN THE HOUSE; THE COUNTY WILL CONTINUE TO VIGOROUSLY PURSUE STATE AUTHORIZATION TO ENACT IMPACT FEES). Assess development trends in the community to determine if federal, state and the Unified Development Ordinance regulations are promoting development consistent with County long range goals RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department ' TIME FRAME: 1993 ( COMPLETED; THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS IN FEBRUARY 1995 REDUCED DENSITY TO SLOW THE SPEED OF GROWTH AND MAINTAIN A RURAL ATMOSPHERE) M 'Explore the potential of having a wildlife inventory prepared for Currituck County. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department TIME FRAME: 1993 (STAFF WAS UNABLE TO FIND GRANT FUNDS TO. PREPARE WILDLIFE INVENTORY; STAFF WILL CONTINUE TO LOOK FOR GRANT FUNDS) ' Discuss with the State the feasibility of allowingwaste water from water treatment plants to be injected into the ground as opposed to being discharged into surface water bodies. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners and,County Manager TIME FRAME: 1993 (COMPLETED; STATE HAS DENIED THE REQUEST TO ALLOW GROUND WATER INJECTION OF TREATED WASTE WATER) ' Identify the location of petrified forests and establish regulations for their protection. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department TIME FRAME: 1993 (PETRIFIED FORESTS WERE IDENTIFIED AT THE SAME TIME AS MARITIME FORESTS. SINCE THE PETRIFIED FORESTS WERE LOCATED ON STATE PROPERTY BELOW THE MEAN HIGH WATER MARK, REGULATIONS OR GUIDELINES WERE NOT NECESSARY FOR PROTECTION) ' Monitor the availability of water on the Outer Banks using test wells. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Public Works Department TIME FRAME: 1993 (COMPLETED; OUTER BANKS WATER SUPPLY STUDY WAS COMPLETED AND TEST WELLS DUG; BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ARE PRESENTLY CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVES TO PROVIDE CENTRALIZED WATER TO ALL RESIDENTS OF THE OUTER BANKS IN POPLAR BRANCH TOWNSHIP) 138 1 1994 Explore the potential of establishing conservation easements allowing a landowner to maintain title to the property but prohibit development of sensitive areas in exchange for financial consideration. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department TIME FRAME: 1994 (STAFF HAS OBTAINED INFORMATION FOR ESTABLISHING CONSERVATION EASEMENTS; IMPLEMENTATION WILL OCCUR IN CONJUNCTION WITH AMENDMENT TO COMMON OPEN SPACE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS) Prepare a study to determine housing needs and identify areas that qualify for housing grants. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department TIME FRAME: 1994 (A REVIEW OF HOUSING CONDITIONS IDENTIFIED THE NEED FOR A SCATTERED REHABILITATION GRANT; THE COUNTY WAS AWARDED $514,656 FOR REHABILITATION OF HOUSES; IMPLEMENTATION IS NOW UNDERWAY) A plan shall be prepared that outlines the County's policies on reconstruction after a major storm event. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Emergency Services, Currituck County Planning Department and Board of Commissioners TIME FRAME: 1994 (A GRANT WAS OBTAINED TO PREPARE THE REPORT; DRAFT REPORT IS COMPLETED AND WILL BE FINALIZED IN 1996) Assess public attitude towards growth and incorporate into the 1995 Land Use Plan. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department TIME FRAME: 1994 (GRANT WAS AWARDED; PUBLIC INPUT MEETINGS COMPLETED; MAIL -OUT SURVEY WILL BE SENT BEFORE JANUARY 1996) Prepare 1995 Land Use Plan. RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Board of Commissioners, Planning Board, Planning Department TIME FRAME: 1995 (IN PROGRESS) Support the establishment of the Wildlife Museum through monetary means and staff resources; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck Wildlife Guild TIME FRAME: 1995 (COUNTY PURCHASED WHALEHEAD CLUB FOR A WILDLIFE MUSEUM) Establish a visitors' center at the proposed Wildlife Museum to advise tourists on areas of interest in Currituck County; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners TIME FRAME: 1995 (INFORMATION ON THE AREA WILL BE AVAILABLE ONCE THE WILDLIFE MUSEUM IS OPEN) Explore feasibility of a county -wide or community -wide sewage treatment system; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department, Public Works Department and County Engineer TIME FRAME: 1995 (THERE ARE NO PLANS TO PREPARE THIS STUDY PRIOR TO UPDATING THE 1995 LAND USE PLAN; THIS PROJECT WILL BE RE-EVALUATED AS PART OF THE LAND USE PLAN UPDATE) 139 1 ' Establish three public restroom facilities on the Outer Banks, one near the Dare County line, one in Corolla and one in Carova Beach; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Currituck County Planning Department TIME FRAME: 1995 (ONE PUBLIC RESTROOM FACILITY IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION NEAR THE DARE COUNTY LINE; A SECOND PUBLIC RESTROOM FACILITY IS BEING CONSIDERED IN COROLLA VILLAGE AT THE LIGHTHOUSE IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE WILDLIFE MUSEUM -THERE IS NO TIME LINE OR BUDGET ' ESTABLISHED; NO PUBLIC RESTROOM FACILITY IS PLANNED IN THE CAROVA BEACH AREA AT THIS TIME) Prepare a study on the potential for having water and sewer services under central control for the entire Outer Banks; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Public Works Department TIME FRAME: 1995 (THE COUNTY IS PRESENTLY WORKING ON A PLAN TO HAVE CENTRALIZED WATER PROVIDED TO THE ENTIRE OUTER BANKS WHICH MAY INCLUDE HAVING ALL SYSTEMS UNDER CENTRALIZED CONTROL; THERE ARE NO PLANS AT THIS TIME TO HAVE ALL CENTRALIZED SEWER SYSTEMS UNDER ON CONTROL) Prepare a plan to provide centralized water to Gibbs Woods, Knotts Island and the Currituck Outer ' Banks; RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: Board of Commissioners to authorize study TIME FRAME: 1995 (GRANT WAS AWARDED FOR REPORT IN NOVEMBER 1995; PROJECT WILL BE ' COMPLETED IN 1996) 140 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 APPENDIX (p TABLE 1 THOROUGHFARE PLAN STREET TABULATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CURRITUCK APPENDIX . EXISTING RECOMMENDED X - SECTION CAPACITY X - SECTION DIST*RDWY*ROW CURRENT 1987 2010 RDWAY * ROW FACILITY & SECTION MI * FT *FT (FUTURE) ADTS ADTS (ULT) *(ULT) SR 1137 FR SR1136-MP0280 12.801 181 601 21001 5041 10001 (L) I ADQ MP0280-MP0340 1 .601 161 601 18001 2001 4001 (L) I ADQ MP0340-CURR SOUND 11.301 161 601 18001 2001 4001 (L) I ADQ SR'1139 i FR SR1137-SR1140 1 .301 181 601 21001 4001 6001 (L) I ADQ SR 1140 FR SR1137-MP0020 1 .201 181 601 21001 1701 3001 (L) I ADQ MP0020-US158 11.701 181 601 21001 5331 8001 (L) I ADQ 1 SR 1147 I I I I I I I I FR NC34-MP0380 13.801 181 601' 21001 5001 9001 (L) I ADQ MP0380-CAMDEN CO 1 .401 181 1 601 21001 3501 8001 (L) I ADQ SR 1205 I I I I I I FR NC34-SR1147 1 .101 181 601 21001 1201 5001 (L) I ADQ SR 1222 NC 168 - SR 1228 14.421 181 601 21001 8001 15001 (L) I ADQ SR 1228 - NC 168 16.801 181 601 21001 16001 40001 (L) I ADQ FR SR1222-SR1273 1 .101 201 601 1 23101 401 4000I (L) I ADQ SR 1227 I I I I I 1 FR NC168-MP0209 12.091 181 601 21001 8371 16001 (L) I ADQ MP0209-SR1218 11.801 201 601 23101 3001 5001 (L) I ADQ SR 1242 FR NC168-NC168 CURRITUCKI .601 221 601 25801 5001 10001 (H) 1 .70 SR 1251 i I I I I I 1 I I FR VIRGINIA - SOUND 11.401 161 601 18001 4001 8001 (L) I ADQ PROPOSED BRIDGE I I I I I I I I ADYLETT - COROLLA 15.201 i --I --I ----I ---I 80001BRIDGE 1 --- jql APPENDIX J'� TABLE 1 THOROUGHFARE PLAN STREET TABULATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CURRITUCK APPENDIX EXISTING RECOMMENDED X - SECTION CAPACITY X - SECTION DIST*RDWY*ROW CURRENT 1987 2010 RDWAY * ROW FACILITY & SECTION MI * FT *FT (FUTURE) ARTS ADTS (ULT) *(ULT) US 158 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 FR CAMDEN-NC 168 18.411 2411001 23101 36001 80001 NC 168 - MP 1095 12.541 641 801 280001 57821 160001 MP 1095 - MP 1281 11.861 4811501 192001 64581 160001 MP 1281 - NC 3 14.431 241 801 96001 64581 160001 NC 3 - SR 1125 12.551 6011001 240001 63071 180001 SR 1125 - MP 2131 11.521 6411001 280001 70001 180001 MP 2131 - MP 2342 12.011 2411001 80001 70001 180001 MP 2342 - MP 2480 11.381 2211001 80001 70001 180001 MP 2480 - MP 2563 1 .831 2411001 96001 70001 180001 MP_2563 - MP 3073 15.101 2211001 80001 70001 200001 MP 3073 - MP 3109 1 .361 2411001 96001 72841 220001 MP 3109 - SR 1102 11.261 2211001 80001 72841 260001 SR 1102 - MP 3306 1 .711 241AB01 96001 *70001 350001 MP 3306 - DARE CO 11.541 201A801 65001 70001 450001 NC 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 FR US 158 - MP 221 12.271 201 601 65001 4501 10001 NC 34 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 FR NC 168 - SR 1203 13.101 2211001 80001 22501 45001 SR 1203 - CAMDEN CO 13.261 2211001 80001 18001 38001 NC 615 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 FERRY X-ING-SR 1260 1 .311 201 601 65001 6001 11001 SR 1260 - SR 1265 12.731 161 601 50001 6001 22001 SR 1265 - VA STATE LINE 1.7.221 181 601 50001 6001 11001 NC 12 I I I I FR DARE CO -,SR 1185 110.91 20 1 --1 65001 16001 53001 NC 168 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 FR US 158 - MP 12 1 .121 6411001 280001 57821 160001 MP 12 - VA STATE LINE 118.21 2411001 96001 61001 246001 SR 1142 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 FR SR 1141-MP0095 1 .951 201 801 23101 7001 14001 MP 0095-.MP0340 12.451 181 601 21001 6001 12001 MP 0340- CURR SOUND 12.901 161 601 18001 4501 9001 SR 1131 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I FR US 158-NC3 12.501 181 601 21001 11591 18001 SR 1135 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 FR SR1136-SR1131 1 .651 181 601 21001 4651 10001 Iyv B D D D D D D D D D D D D D 1 200 1 ADO I ADO ADO I ADO I ADO I ADO I ADO I ADO I ADO ADO ADO I ADO I ADO (L) I ADO (L) I ADO (L) I ADO (L) I ADO (L) I ADO (L) I ADO I 1 60 D I ADO D I ADO I (L) I ADO (L) I ADO (L) I ADO (L) I ADO (L) I ADO J 1 1 Appendix 7 Current Plans, Policies $ Regulations LONG RANGE PLANS 1990 CAMA Land Use Plan: The 1990 Land Use Plan was prepared by the Planning Department and contained data and policies on the following issues: population; economy; transportation; residential development, land use; environment; county facilities; storm hazards; and growth management. The plan also contained an implementation plan. 1985 CAMA Land Use Plan: This plan was prepared by Talbert, Cox and Associates, Inc.. 'It documented existing conditions, identified environmental constraints, enumerated goals and objectives, and contained a land classification map. 1980 CAMA land Use Plan: The plan prepared by Coastal Consultants, Ltd. provided information on ' land use, population, economic conditions, policies and a land classification map based on CAMA guidelines. 1976 CAMA Land Use Plan: This plan was prepared to meet State regulations of the 1974 Coastal Area Management Act. The plan included background material and analysis and identified land use Issues. County of Currituck Mainland Water Facilities Phase II/III Study: This report was completed by Black and Veatch in December 1989. The document projects the needs of the Currituck County mainland water system through the year 2010. Shallow well fields and. expanded conventional treatment represents the most cost effective water supply and treatment systems. If the yields are not adequate to serve the needs of Currituck, deep wells and a reverse osmosis (RO) system becomes more cost effective. Financing facilities is also discussed. ' Currituck County Airport Master Plan: Prepared by Talbert, Cox and Associates, Inca in September 1988, this plan reviews existing conditions, analyzes future demands and capacity, identifies facility ' alternatives, overviews environmental constraints and recommends development plans for expansion of airport facilities over the next twenty years. ' Currituck County Community Facilities Plan: This plan was prepared by Howard T. Capps and Associates in 1978. It contained an inventory of existing facilities and discussed future community facility needs. Sources of revenue were also identified. ' Currituck County Thoroughfare Plan: This plan was prepared by the Department of Transportation in June 1988. It analyzes growth patterns, traffic conditions, and recommends improvements to the County's thoroughfare system. Storm Hazard Mitigation and Reconstruction Plan (1995): This plan outlines what steps should be taken by the county in order to minimize damage during major storm events. The plan also outlines procedures the county should adopt to assist in reconstruction after the storms. U.S. Highway 158 & N.C. Highway 168 Corridor Plan (1994): This plan outlined recommendations for development along US 158 & NC 168 in order to promote economic development, enhance safety and improve appearance. The corridor plan won the 1995 NCAPA Outstanding Comprehensive Plan Award. 143 1997- 2003 State Transportation Improvement Plan: The plan recommends Improvements to roads, the airport and bicycle/pedestrian accommodations for Currituck County. Recommendations Include, among other things: completion of widening NC 168 by 1998; construction of a mid -sound bridge to start in 2001; identify need to widen US 158 from Barco to Camden; repair to the Barco runway in 2000; and widening of NC 12 NC 168, US 158 and NC 615 for bicycle and pedestrian needs. Growth Financing Plan (1996): Prepared by Tischler & Associates, this plan forecasts population growth in Currituck County, determined the costs of providing services based on projected growth, and recommended alternative financing to help pay for services. Among the recommendations were establishing impact fees and explore increasing the occupancy tax. Currituck County Hurricane Evacuation Plan: This 1988 plan establishes hurricane evacuation procedure for Currituck County including: authority; organization; warning and alert systems; evacuation areas; re-entry; responsibilities; and public information. Currituck County School Facilities Needs Analysis and Long Range Capital Improvements Plan: Prepared by PMA Consulting Services in 1992, this plan provides an analysis of current school facilities, , projects future enrollment, and recommends a capital improvements plan to accommodate growth. Currituck County Water Supply Plan: The Water Supply Plan for the southern Currituck Outer Banks, prepared by Stroud and Associates in 1994, surveyed existing central water systems, analyzed areas without central water and provided suggestions on how to serve them, and recommended ways to manage water supplies. ADOPTED ORDINANCES & POLICIES, REQUIRED PERMITS, FEDERAL 8Z STATE REGULATIONS Building Permits: The County has adopted the State Building Code and enforces the Code through the Panning & Inspections Department. Enforced by the Planning & Inspections Department Currituck County Outer Banks Vehicular and Barrier Strand Ordinance: The ordinance deals with the operation of power -driven vehicles on the Outer Banks Barrier Strand. This ordinance was last amended in 1986. Enforced by the Sheriffs Deoartment Currituck County Water System Policies: Establish County policies on connections, billing, water quality, areas of responsibility, suspension of service, installation of lines in subdivisions, and administration. Federal and State Regulations: State and Federal permits and regulations as administered by applicable agencies. These regulations include, but are not limited to, CAMA requirements, mining regulations, air and land quality standards, 404 Wetland requirements, and solid waste disposal regulations. Minimum Housing Standards: This ordinance, as amended in 1988, authorizes the Building Inspector to investigate the conditions of dwellings and provides the power to require repair, closing and/or demolition of dwellings determined to be unfit for human habitation. Enforced by the Building Inspections Department Multi -Hazards Plan: Adopted in September 1988, the purpose of this plan is to provide information on major potential hazards affecting the area, to develop a plan of action to protect the population 144 from those potential hazards and to provide an emergency management plan in the event. of a natural or man-made emergency. ' Administered by the Emergency Services Department. The Sand Dune Protection Ordinance of Currituck County: This ordinance was adopted in December ' 1971. It contains provisions to preserve and promote the protection of the Outer Banks by controlling the disturbances to sand dunes. Enforced by the Sheriffs Department. ' _Septic Tank Permits: Septic tank permits are required by the County before on -lot sewage disposal systems can be used. Building permits will not be issued until adequate sewage disposal has been provided. ' Enforced by the County Health Department, Unified Development Ordinance: In April 1989, Currituck County adopted the Unified Development ' Ordinance. This ordinance contains, among other things: a. Zoning regulations (controls land use, defines setbacks, establishes administrative ' mechanisms, regulates mobile homes, controls PUD's and multi -family development, adequate public facilities standards; etc.). b. Subdivision regulations (controls arrangement of lots and streets when dividing land). c. Floodway/fioodplain regulations (establishes guidelines for developments located within ' floodways and floodplains and contains provisions for storm water management). Enforced by the Currituck County Planning & Inspections Department Planning Commission and the Board of Commissioners. (NOTE: Currituck County does not have historic preservation ordinance. State sedimentation and stormwater regulations apply to Currituck County) ' STUDIES 1983 Currituck County Outer Banks Carrying Capacity Study: This study analyzed five factors dealing ' with the capacity to absorb growth on the Outer Banks: suitability of land for development, possible need for hurricane evacuation, road network for access, wastewater treatment, and drinking water supply. ' Currituck Sound Resource Management Project: This project consisted of the following reports: "Water Quality, Salinity, and Fisheries in Currituck Sound" (December 1980); "The Impact of Salinity Introductions Upon Fishing Habitat in the Currituck Sound" (April 1983); "Socioeconomic Status and Potential of the Commercial Fishery of Currituck Sound" (March 1982); "Socioeconomic Status and Potential of Trapping, Sport Fishing, and Hunting in Currituck Sound" (February 1983); "Currituck Sound Bibliography" (October 1982). 1983 North Carolina Anadromous Fisheries Management Program: This report identifies spawning areas of Alewife and Blueback Herring in the Currituck Sound area. ' 1984 Impact of Salinity Introductions upon Fish Habitat in Currituck Sound: This study discussed the impact on commercial and sport fishing in Currituck Sound and the impact on fresh and salt water fish species if salt water was introduced into Currituck Sound by inlets in the Outer Banks. Soil Survey of Currituck County, North Carolina: The survey, Issued in 1982, identifies different soil types, reviews uses and management of soils, analyzes soil properties and identifies soil locations in Currituck County. Transportation Access Over Currituck Sound; A Feasibility Study: This study was prepared in February 1989 for the North Carolina Department of Transportation by Howard, Needles, Tammen and Bergendoff. It discusses accessibility problems on the Currituck Outer Banks, Identifies alternatives and makes recommendations. One of the conclusions of this report is to build a second bridge adjacent to Wright Memorial immediately and build a mid -county bridge (Waterlilly to Corolla preferred) after a thorough analysis. The report discusses environmental concerns of a mid -county bridge and identifies secondary concerns, that being an increase in development activity on the Currituck Outer Banks. Currituck County Outer Banks Water Supply Study (1991): This study was prepared by DEHNR Water Resources and looked at several models to determine the impact development was having on water supplies on the Currituck Outer Banks, The study recommended, among other things, Interconnection of water and wastewater systems, adoption of water conservation measures, and further study of the Outer Banks water supply. Currituck County Southern Outer Banks Water Study: Prepared by Stroud Engineering, this 1994 report was a follow-up to the 1991 study by DEHNR. The study surveyed existing water treatment systems and provided recommendations on how best to manage water supplies on the Currituck Outer Banks. Ocean Sands Water and Sewer District Master Plan Update (1996): This study, prepared by McDowell and Associates, outlines recommendations for meeting future water and sewer demands for Ocean Sands Subdivision, an outer banks planned unit development consisting of 2,200+ dwellings and 428,000 sq. ft. of commercial floor area. Currituck Sound Outstanding Resource Waters Evaluation (1994): Prepared by the Water Quality Section of DEM, this report analyzed the potential of classifying the Currituck Sound as an Outstanding Resource Water (ORW). The report concluded that the Currituck Sound did not qualify as an ORW because of chronic algae blooms and high nutrients. ' Mid-Currituck Sound Bridge Alternatives Study Report (1995): This study reviewed alternative alignments for the proposed mid -sound bridge as well as the no -build alternative. No specific ' alignment was recommended in this report. APES Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan (CCMP - 1994): The CCMP contains ' management strategies recommended to preserve and protect the natural resources of the Albemarle -Pamlico sounds watershed. Currituck County Recreation Study: Prepared in 1992 by Currituck County, this plan identified the ' recreational needs of Currituck and suggested recommendations for recreational facilities. Regional Water Study For The Albemarle Water Resources Task Force (June 1996): This study ' outlines issues related to regional solutions to water, particularly for Elizabeth City, Pasquotank County, Currituck County, Dare County and Camden County. 1 1 1 146