Comprehensive Plan-2001

a
U � �
cl
-117ri
A ° Draft s ��
DIVISION OF
° c COASTAL. MANAGEIVIEN T
° U
CITY OF SOUTHPORT
U A
A NORTH CARO LI NA
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
JULY, 2001
Prepared By:
Holland Consulting Planners, Inc.
Wilmington, North Carolina
The preparation of this document was financed in part through a grant provided by the
North Carolina Coastal Management Program, through funds provided by the Coastal
Zone ManagementAct of 1972, as amended, which is administered by the Office of Ocean
and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

I
I
7
I
II
I
I
I
0
I
1
I
IL
CITY OF SOUTHPORT
NORTH CAROLINA
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
SECTION I: ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
A. INTRODUCTION.............................................I-1
B. PLAN PURPOSE.............................................I-1
C. HISTORY..................................................I-2
D. REGIONAL SETTING ................................. ... .... 1-6
E. POPULATION, HOUSING, AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS ....................
1-6
1. City of Southport Permanent Population .............................
1-6
2. Age Composition ............................................
1-9
3. Racial and Gender Composition .................................
1-10
4. City of Southport Seasonal Population, .............................
1-11
a. Introduction and Methodology ..............................
1-11
b. Seasonal Population ....................................
1-13
C. Day Visitors ...........................................
1-13
5. Housing Characteristics ............ ............... .........
1-13
6. Economy................................................1-16
a. Regional Economy .....................................
1-16
b. Brunswick County Economy and Employment ....................
1-19
C. Local Economy ........................................
1-22
F. EXISTING LAND USE ......................................... 1-25
1. Annexation ............................................... 1-28
2. Urban and Developed Land ................. 1-28
a.
Residential ..........................................
1-28
b.
Commercial .........................................
1-29
C.
Industrial ................................ .. ......
1-30
d.
Public and Institutional .. .................. • .........
1-32
e.
Transportation/Public Utilities .............................
1-32
f.
Vacant Land .........................................
1-33
3. Land Use Compatibility Analysis .................................
1-33
a.
Preservation of Established Residential Areas vs. Commercial Development
1-33
b.
Protection of Water Quality as Development Increases .............
1-33
C.
Preservation of Open Space ......... .. ..... .. .......
1-34
4. Basinwide Water Quality Management .............................
1-34
5. Existing Land Use Issues ......................................
1-35
II
1

PAGE
6. Existing Ordinances and Land Use Controls .......................... 1-36
a.
Zoning Ordinance ......................................
1-36
b.
Commercial Design and Development Standards ..................
1-37
C.
Subdivision Ordinance ...................................
1-37
d.
Planned Residential Development Ordinance ....................
1-37
e.
Master Drainage Plan ...................................
1-37
f.
North Carolina State Building Code ..........................
1-37
g.
Federal Flood Insurance Program ............................
1-37
h.
Southport Revitalization Plan ..............................
1-38
i.
City of Southport Waterfront Access Plan, 1989 ..................
1-38
j.
City of Southport 1986, 1990, and 1997 CAMA Land Use Plan ..........
1-38
k.
Brunswick County Thoroughfare Plan .........................
1-38
I..
City of Southport Thoroughfare Plan .........................
1-38
M.
City of Southport Sign Ordinance ............................
1-38
n.
Traffic Operations and Pedestrian Safety Study ..................
1-38
o.
Impact Fee Ordinance ...................................
1-39
G. STIMULANTS TO DEVELOPMENT .................................. 1-39
H. DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINTS: LAND SUITABILITY ...................... 1-39
1. Topography/Geology........................................ 1-39
2. Flood Hazard Areas ......................................... 1-40
3. Soils .................................................... 1-47
4. Manmade Hazards/Restrictions.................................. 1-49
5. Fragile Areas .............................................. 1-50
a. Coastal Wetlands ...................................... 1.50
b. Estuarine Waters ...................................... 1-51
C.
Estuarine Shorelines ....................................
1-51
d.
Public Trust Areas .....................................
1-51
e.
Wetlands Defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act ............
1-52
f.
Slopes in Excess of 12%..................................
1-52
g.
Excessive Erosion Areas ..................................
1-54
h.
Historic and Archaeological Sites ............................
1-54
i.
Natural Heritage Areas ..................................
1-56
j.
Other Fragile Areas .....................................
1-56
6. Areas
of Resource Potential ....................................
1-56
a.
Regionally Significant Public Parks ...........................
1-56
b.
Marine Resources ......................................
1-58
C.
Agricultural and Forestlands ...............................
1-59
I. URBAN FORM ............................. '................. 1-59
1. Components of Urban Form ................................... 1-59
a. Districts .............................. .............. 1-59
b. Paths .............................................. 1-60
1) Transportation Paths ............................... 1-60
2

0 PAGE
2) Natural Paths .................................... 1-61
a3) Southport Transportation and Natural Paths ................ 1-61
C. Nodes.............................................I-61
a d. Landmarks ........................................... I-62
e. Edges . 1-62
a
J.
1.
DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINTS: PUBLIC FACILITIES .......................
Water Supply
1-64
1-64
2.
Sewer..................................................I-64
O
3.
4.
Solid Waste Disposal ••,••....•....•.•.•....•.••......•••...•.
Schools
I-67
1-68
5.
Transportation ............................................
1-69
a
6.
7.
Police, Fire, and Emergency Medical • ..............................
Recreation
1-72
1-74
8.
Drainage ................................................
1-76
9.
10.
Health Services ..............................:..............
Cable Services
I-77
1-77
11.
Electrical System and Energy Generating Facilities .....................
1-77
SECTION 11: PROJECTED LAND DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS
A.
PROJECTED DEMOGRAPHIC DATA
II-1
1.
Permanent Population . :::..............................
II-1
a. Regional and County ....................................
II-1
b. City of Southport .........•
II-2
2.
....................
City of Southport Seasonal Population ........
II-3
3.
Commercial and Industrial Development ......... ... .............
II-3
4.
Housing Trends ............................................
II-4
5.
Public Land Use .............................................
II-4
6.
Areas Likely to Experience Major Land Use Changes ....................
II-5
B.
PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT NEEDS AND LAND USE ISSUES .............
II-5
1.
Introduction ..............................................
II-5
2.
Water Supply .............................................
11-6
3.
Sewer ........................... .....................
II-6
4.
Solid Waste Disposal ........... ...............................
II-7
a5.
Schools ............................. ...................
II-7
6.
Police, Fire, and Emergency Medical ..............................
II-8
O 7. Recreation ...............: .............................. . . II-9
8. Drainage 11-10
9. Electrical System and Energy Facilities ............................ II-10
10. Transportation ........................................... 11-10
a 11. Summary ............................................... II-12
C. REDEVELOPMENT ISSUES ..................................... II-12
3

PAGE
SECTION III: FUTURE LAND USE PLAN
A. INTRODUCTION ............................................III-1
B. LAND USE CATEGORIES ....................................... III-4
C.
LOCATION ASPECTS OF LAND USE ................................
III-7
1.
Commercial ..............................................
111-7
2.
Residential ...............................................
III-8
3.
Industrial ................................................
III-8
4.
Office/Institutional/Multi-Family................................
III-8
5.
CBD Mixed Use Districts .......................................
III-9
D. SUMMARY OF GENERAL PRINCIPLES USED TO DEVELOP THE LAND USE PLAN ..... III-9
SECTION IV: URBAN FORM POLICIES
A. INTRODUCTION............................................IV-1
B. URBAN FORM GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT POLICIES .................... IV-1
1. Districts ................................................. IV-1
2. Paths (Natural and Transportation) ... IV-2
3. Nodes..................................................IV-2
4. Landmarks ............................... .............. IV-2
5. Edges .......................... IV-3
SECTION V: IMPLEMENTATION ELEMENTS
A. PLAN DEVELOPMENT ......................................... V-1
1. Housing/Parks and Recreation Committee ........................... V-1
2. Major Streets/Public Services Committee ........................... V-2
3. Central Business District/Historic District Committee ................... V-4
B. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS ............................... * * * * * * * V-6
1. Housing/Parks and Recreation Committee ........................... V-6
2. Central Business District (CBD)/Historic District ...................... V-13
3. Major Streets/Public Services .................................. V-24
SECTION VI: CONCLUSION .......................................... VI-1
4

I
0
u
I
I
II
I
I
I
0
I
I
PAGE
TABLES
Table 1
1999 Certified County Population Estimates ..................
1-8
Table 2
Brunswick County Population Distribution ....................
1-8
Table 3
City of Southport and Brunswick County Population Characteristics by
Age Group ........................................
1-10
Table 4
City of Southport and Brunswick County Percentage Change in
Population by Race and Sex .............................
1-11
Table 5
City of Southport Seasonal, Permanent, and Total Peak Population,
2000............................................
1-12
Table 6
City of Southport and Brunswick County Total Units by Structure Type,
1990............................................
1-14
Table 7
City of Southport and Brunswick County Housing/Vacant Units, 1990 ..
1-14
Table 8
City of Southport and Brunswick County Year Structure Built, 1990 ...
1-15
Table 9
City of Southport and Brunswick County Value of Owner Occupied
Housing Units, 1990..................................
1-16
Table 10
CAMA Regulated Counties One, Five, and Ten -Year Composite Rankings
of Economic Development ..............................
1-18
Table 11
Brunswick County Economic Conditions .....................
1-19
Table 12
Brunswick County Employment and Wages ...................
1-20
Table 13
Brunswick County Retail Sales ...........................
1-20
Table 14
Brunswick County Top Ten Employers ......................
1-21
Table 15
City of Southport, Brunswick County, and North Carolina Median Per
Capita Income, 1985-1990 ..............................
1-22
Table 16
City of Southport Employed Persons 16 Years and Older by Industry,
1980 and 1990 :.................... I ................
1-22
Table 17
City of Southport Poverty Status, 1980 and 1990 ...............
1-24
Table 18
City of Southport and Surrounding Area Major Manufacturing Firms,
2000................... ......... .................
1-25
Table 19
City of Southport Existing Land Uses, September 2000 ...........
1-27
Table 20
City of Southport Building Permit Activity ....................
1-29
Table 21
City of Southport Soil Susceptibility to Flooding ................
1-46
Table 22
City of Southport Soil Associations ........................
1-47
Table 23
Southport Area Tier II Reporters, 1999 ......................
1-49
Table 24
Summary of Paths Southport Planning Jurisdiction ..............
1-61
I
5

PAGE
Table 25
City of Southport Recreation Facilities ......................
1-74
Table 26
City of Southport Public Beach and Waterfront Access Sites ........
1-75
Table 27
City of Southport Commercial Marinas and Dockages .............
1-76
Table 28
CAMA-Regulated Counties and State Total Population and Percent
Change, 2000 - 2020..................................
11-1
Table 29
City of Southport and Brunswick County Population Forecasts .......
II-2
Table 30
National Recreation Standards and Demand for Facilities in Southport
II-9
MAPS
Map 1
City of Southport Location and Township Map .................
1-7
Map 2
City of Southport Existing Land Use ........................
1-26
Map 3
City of Southport Central Business District ...................
1-31
Map 4
City of Southport 100 Year Floodplain ......................
1-41
Map 5A
City of Southport Storm Surge Inundation - Fast Moving Hurricane ....
1-43
Map 5B
City of Southport Storm Surge Inundation - Slow Moving Hurricane ...
1-44
Map 6
City of Southport Soils Map .................. .......
1-48
Map 7
City of Southport Areas of Environmental Concern and Fragile Areas ..
1-53
Map 8
City of Southport Historic District .........................
1-55
Map 9
City of Southport Significant Heritage Areas ..................
1-57
Map 10
City of Southport Urban Form .............................
1-63
Map 11
City of Southport Water Lines ...........................
1-65
Map 12
City of Southport Sewer Lines ...........................
1-66
Map 13
City of Southport Average Daily Traffic Count .................
1-70
Map 14
City of Southport Road Improvement Needs ..................
1-73
Map 15
City of Southport Community Facilities .....................
1-78
Map 16
City of Southport Proposed Thoroughfare and Average Annual Daily
Traffic Counts for 2025................................
II-14
Map 17
City of Southport Future Land Use Map .....................
III-6
Appendix I City of Southport Citizen Participation Plan
Appendix II Issues Identification
Appendix III City of Southport 1997 CAMA Land Use Plan Policy Section
!-

0 SECTION I: ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
aA. INTRODUCTION
I
I
0
I
1
I
In May, 2000, the City of Southport was awarded grant funds through the NC Division of Coastal
Management Local Planning and Management Grant Program to prepare a Comprehensive Plan
for the city's planning jurisdiction. The preparation of this document began in August, 2000, and
was concluded in , 2001. The City of Southport Board of Aldermen adopted
a citizen participation plan to guide the development of this document (see Appendix 1, Citizen
Participation Plan). In addition, the Board of Aldermen appointed three ad hoc committees to
work with the city's planning consultant on the development of this plan. The following
recognizes the people who served on each committee:
Housing/Parks and Recreation
Mr. Paul Fisher*
Mr. James: Brown*
Ms. Betty Cowan**
Mr. Eugene Gore**
Mr. Jim Stephens**
Maior Streets/Public Services
Mr. Jim Powell*
Mr. C. Wayne Hewitt*
Mr. Ed Baldiga**
Mr. Scott Hill**
Ms. Rhonda Davis**
*Board of Aldermen members. **Planning Board members.
CBD/Historic District
Ms. Meezie Childs*
Ms. Stuart Callan*
Ms. Barbara Clewis**
Ms. B. J. Gorman**
Ms. Annelle Royal**
Each committee met independently to identify existing and long-range issues/needs, goals, and
implementing actions for each of their subject areas. At the conclusion of each committee's
analysis, all committees met jointly to report their findings.
B. PLAN PURPOSE
The intent of this Comprehensive Plan is to compile an inventory of existing land use patterns and
a to recommend goals and implementation strategies for future development that are compatible
with the general character of the city. This document represents the city's formal policy
statements concerning land use and land development and supplements the policies contained
in the city's 1997 CAMA Land Use Plan. The plan serves as a guide for city officials when they
review private development proposals and make decisions on the location of public facilities.
The plan also provides a foundation for zoning (N.C.G.S. 160A-383) and subdivision regulations
Cand the capital improvements program, which put the goals and objectives of the land use plan
into action.
a
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-1

I
Preparation of this plan embraces the following vision statement and goals:
Southport desires to maintain its quiet residential atmosphere and to protect
the city's historic assets. Population growth should continue at a moderate
rate. Historically, growth has occurred at an average of 1.3% per year.
Southport desires low impact, environmentally safe, light industry.
Specifically, Southport will endeavor to accomplish the following:
► Preservation of the city's historic district.
► Protection of the city's shoreline vista.
► Redevelopment of the Central Business District.
► Preservation of the city's residential areas.
► Protection of the city's Areas of Environmental Concern consistent with
15A NCAC 7H.'
C. HISTORY
The following provides a summary of the history of Southport as provided in the city's National
Register of Historic Places Inventory - Nomination Form:
"In 1887, the small coastal village of Smithville was rechristened Southport in
eager anticipation of the day when it would emerge as the great seaport of the
southeast. The recent closing off of the new inlet and the dredging of the Cape
Fear had created a natural harbor in Southport. For the first time in two hundred
years, North Carolina had an easily accessible deep water harbor. Surely the
obvious commercial advantages of having a port city here were not going to be
ignored by progressive businessmen of the New South or enterprising northern
capitalists.
The allure of building another Chicago or Atlanta attracted money and men to
Southport. Wealthy outsiders from Boston, Fort Wayne, and Chicago descended
upon the town to buy up land and to speculate in new commercial ventures. Each
month the few hotels and boarding houses were filled with more businessmen.
'An Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) is defined by the Division of Coastal Management as an area
of natural importance. It may be easily destroyed by erosion or flooding, or it may have environmental, social,
economic or aesthetic values that make it valuable to our state. The following AECs are located within the City
of Southport's planning jurisdiction: Coastal Wetlands, Estuarine Waters, Estuarine Shorelines, and Public Trust
Areas.
I
I
I
I
it
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-2

0
Real estate prices began to soar. Dozens of new houses were going up all over
town. The City Council ordered that sidewalks be laid along the sandy streets.
A water system and even electrification were promised.
Notwithstanding this promise of activity, many citizens could recognize that the
Lack of a rail connection with Wilmington and markets further inland would
forever prevent the growth of a metropolitan seaport. What Southport needed,
then, was a railroad line to one of the developing industrial cities in the Piedmont
or at least a trunk line from Wilmington. Several promoters came forth with
schemes to entice railroads to build a line to Southport. The town was eager to
extend every privilege to the railroads, willing to grant any rights promoters might
require. Subscriptions were offered and citizens put forth what capital they had.
But nothing of substance ever developed; the schemes fizzled. The flush of
aexcitement soon abated. The disappointed began to talk about the slow business
of building a new city and developing new lines of commerce. Although the
railroad finally arrived in 1911 with great fanfare, the opportunity had passed.
There was the growing realization that Southport would never become anything
more than a pleasant little coastal village.
oWhatever the commercial advantages of Southport in the late nineteenth century,
the location of the town had a different significance in the eighteenth and early
nineteenth centuries. Lying at the mouth of the Cape Fear River, the site was of
paramount military importance to the English colonists. In the late 1740s, the
royal governor Gabriel Johnston oversaw the construction of a fort named in his
honor. Through the rest of the eighteenth century, the fort never seemed to be
equipped with enough military artillery to be properly defended. By the 1790s,
a two or three small houses had been put up near the fort by river pilots. These
pilots would sail out to the ocean and search for ships seeking to enter the Cape
Fear. For a fee, the river pilots offered to guide the cargo ships through the
n dangerous shoals and up the river. In these years, a few families from Wilmington
l� came down to the area around the fort to spend the summer months taking in the
n cool and healthy sea air. Agitation for the establishment of a town led to an act
Uby the General Assembly in 1792 to establish a town near Fort Johnston, on the
west side of the Cape Fear River, in Brunswick County.
Benjamin Smith and Joshua Potts laid off the town around the fort in one hundred
half acre lots. Where the shore line curved, the two commissioners turned their
streets to run parallel with the river. Cross streets were made to run
perpendicular to the river so that a number of odd triangular parcels of land were
created. Boundary Street (Caswell Avenue) was the western limit_ and Brown
aStreet the northern boundary of the town.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-3
a

Two important decisions made in the first decade of the nineteenth century were
to have a lasting influence on the development of the new town of Smithville. In
1804, the United States War Department decided to rebuild the dilapidated Fort
Johnston. in so doing, it assured the continuing presence of the military in the
town. Four years later, an act was passed by the General Assembly to move the
Brunswick County Courthouse from Lockwood's Folly to Smithville. With the
courthouse came the other offices of the county government. These two
institutions helped mold the character of the town during the antebellum period.
A third significant development that influenced the character of the town was the
emergence of the tourist trade. It was a latent feature present from the time
when Joshua Potts sailed down from Wilmington in the early 1790s to take
advantage of the salubrious climate. Only in the last decade before the Civil War
did Smithville receive a large number of visitors. By the latter part of the fifties,
it was the favorite resort of persons of wealth and refinement from Wilmington
and other places for health and pleasure. It was in these years that popular hotels
and boarding houses such as the Stuart House on the waterfront and the Carolina
House flourished.
On the eve of the Civil War, the county seat had a little less than seven hundred
inhabitants. Of this number, an overwhelming majority found their living
connected in some way with the river and ocean. The leading occupation, as it
was to continue to be until the early twentieth century, was that of river pilot.
If a man was not a pilot, then he was either a pilot apprentice or seaman. There
was a small number of fishermen, boat carpenters, and dock workers. Other
occupations included carpenters, mechanics, lawyers, boarding house keepers,
and merchants. A few soldiers, ministers, and county officers completed the list.
Black slaves were employed as household servants or dock workers but were few
in number.
Antebellum Smithville was not a wealthy town. Few planters had a secondary
home in Smithville. River pilots could earn tittle money and during trade
depressions, competition was always fierce. The few merchants in town supplied
only the most basic goods. Without superfluous wealth, there was little need for
fancy shops or special service trades. The county court only met four times a year
and these were but a brief few weeks. The boarding homes did brisk business but
there was too little else. The county jail seemed always to be filled but the
boarders there asked for little and received much less. The military population
was never large and for many years the fort would be virtually abandoned. Only
during the long summer months of the tourist season was there some semblance
of prosperous commercial activity. A few hotel keepers accumulated some capital
but most of its was usually poured back into refurbishing their property.
Smithville was not without its few well-to-do citizens or one or two fine two story
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-4

I
I
0
I
I
I
I
I
0
houses on Bay Street, but by in large most of its inhabitants were of modest
means.
Smithville survived the Civil War and Reconstruction without much social turmoil
or economic disruption. In a town dependent on the sea and not the surrounding
agricultural fortunes, this was hardly surprising. During the war, many river pilots
volunteered their services to the Confederacy as blockade runners. The intrepid
courage of the blockade runner was admired but all too often, he lost either his
ship, his life, or both. After the capture of the forts of the lower Cape Fear in
January 1865, the citizens of Smithville found it prudent to surrender the town to
the US Navy. After the war, a Freedman's Bureau was established in town to see
to the affairs of the former slaves. Many blacks left their former plantations along
the river and chose to settle in Smithville. By the turn of the century, two distinct
black neighborhoods had been established, one in the northwestern part of town
and a smaller on in the northeast section.
In the 1870s, work began on closing New Inlet. Once this task was completed, it
was realized that the currents of the Cape Fear River would naturally create a
deeper channel and an excellent harbor -at Southport and further upriver. With
this development, the future prospects of the town seemed bright indeed.
Although the exaggerated enthusiasm over the new seaport described earlier was
transient, the more modest achievements of the new city of Southport were of
lasting significance. The outsiders who came to Southport brought with them two
important things: money and business acumen. Real estate companies, insurance
agencies, an a bank were established. By the last decade of the nineteenth
century, a nascent commercial district was forming on East Moore Street. With
a steady flow and accumulation of finance capital, several public improvements
were undertaken throughout the town. With the possibility of securing loans very
easily, homeowners began to make much needed additions to their old houses, or
as it was becoming fashionable, to build an entirely new house on a much grander
scale. Houses were being built in areas where there had been little more than
swamp or forest. Whole new neighborhoods and subdivisions were developed.
The face of Southport changes dramatically in the quarter of a century after 1887.
Along the river front, several new docks appeared in response to the growing
commercial importance of the fishing fleet. A coaling dock was erected at the
foot of Rhett Street to service the numerous steam ships that anchored at
Southport. New churches and a new school were built to minister to the needs of
an expanding population. In 1890, there were 1,181 inhabitants in Southport,
nearly double the population of thirty years before. Along with the newcomers
from the Midwest, several Scandinavians and their families emigrated to
Southport, giving the town something of a cosmopolitan atmosphere.
L
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-5

Through World War I and the early 1920s, Southport sustained a moderate growth
rate. The great boom era faded slowly and finally ended with the Depression of
the 1930s. Military activity in and around Southport during World War II
encouraged the economic revival of the town. After the war, a building boom
reminiscent of the late nineteenth century, created new suburbs outside the
historic center of Southport. This upswing in economic activity was sponsored in
part by the influx of a few large industries and the commercial development of
nearby beaches. A severe challenge to the continued growth and development of
the town emerged in the 1970s when the citizens of Brunswick County voted to
relocate the county seat."
D. REGIONAL SETTING
The City of Southport is located in Brunswick County at the southernmost tip of North Carolina
and is located in the Smithville Township. Map 1 depicts Southport's location and Brunswick
County's townships. North Carolina Routes 211 and 87/133 provide access from Southport to
US17, US74/76, US421, US117, and Interstate 40. The Port of Wilmington is located
approximately 18 miles up the Cape Fear River from Southport. The Myrtle Beach resort area
is approximately 50 miles southwest of Southport. Air transportation is approximately 30 miles
at the Wilmington International Airport (ILM).
Transportation is discussed in greater detail in a latter section of this plan.
E. POPULATION, HOUSING AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
1. City of Southport Permanent Population
Due to Brunswick County's proximity to the coast, it has proven to be a popular destination for
new residents over the past several years. Brunswick County ranked fourth in the state for total
population growth (36.5%) between 1990-1999, behind Wake, Johnston, and Union counties.
Brunswick County's net migration rate ranks first in the state at 33.5%. Net migration can be
defined as new population moving into an area from other counties, states, etc. This figure
serves as a more accurate indication of true population growth versus the population growth
estimate, which takes into account natural increase (births minus deaths). Table 1 provides a
snapshot of population growth for the state's ten fastest growing counties.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-6 a

O MAP
City of Southport
Location and
Township Map
Columbus
County
�-'t'" �-��''•, olden Beach
South
Carolina C ` Ocean Isle Beach
'� Sunset Beach
Leland.
Beach Yaupon Beachr
Caswell Beach
Bald Head Island
O N
W E
s
R 4 0 4 Miles
The preparation of this document was financed in part through a
Q grant provided by the North Carolina Coastal Management
Program, through funds provided by the Coastal Zone Management
Act of 1972, as amended, which is administered by the Office
a of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.
New Hanover
County
i{
- Southport
Municipalities
Townships
Minor Roads
* Township names are underlined
PAGE 1-7

I
I
H
0
I
I
0
I
I
I
Table 1
1999 Certified County Population Estimates
Counties
July 99
Estimate
April 90
Census
Growth
Number %
A90-J99
Births
A90-J99
Deaths
A90-J99
Nat. Gr.
Net Migration
Estimate %
Wake
592,218
426,311
165,907
38.9
72,744
26,176
46,568
119,339
28.0
Johnston
112,154
81,306
30,848
37.9
14,143
8,001
6,142
24,706
30.4
Union
115,344
84,210
31,134
37.0
15,051
6,512
8,539
22,595
26.8
Brunswick
69,577
50,985
18,592
36.5
6,830
5,317
1,513
17,079
33.5
Hoke
31,102
22,856
8,246
36.1
4,630
1,852
.2,778
5,468
23.9
Pender
38,971
28,855
10,116
35.1
4,057
2,988
1,069.
9,047
31.4
Currituck
17,496
13,736
3,760
27.4
1,705
1,372
333
3,427
24.9
Dare
28,918
22,746
6,172
27.1
2,815
1,769
.1,046
5,126
22.5
Cabarrus
125,051
98,935
26,116
26.4
14,312
8,854
5,458
20,658
20.9
Iredell
117,804
93,205
24,599
26.4
13,653
8,848
4,805
19,794
21.2
North
7,650,699
6,632,448
1,018,251
15.4
968,736
586,190
382,546
635,705
9.6
Carolina
Source: State Demographics, North Carolina Office of State Planning.
Roughly ten percent of Brunswick County's incorporated population lives within Southport.
Southport has the second highest population in the county behind Oak Island. Oak Island was
incorporated in 1999, due to a merger between Long Beach and Yaupon Beach. Although
Southport has one of the highest municipal populations in the county, it experienced the lowest
growth rate (12.3%) between 1990-1999. Table 2 presents the population distribution within
Brunswick County. The figures for 1990 and earlier were taken from US Census reports. The
2000 population data are based on the preliminary 2000 U.S. Census.
Table 2
Brunswick County
Population Distribution
Municipality
1990 2000
% Change
Bald Head Island
78 173
121.8%
Belville
66 285
331.8%
Boiling Spring Lakes
1,650 2,972
80.1%
Bolivia
228 148
-35.1 %
Calabash
179 711
297.2%
Carolina Shores*
1,031 1,482
43.7%
Caswell Beach
175 370
111.4%
Holden Beach
626 787
25.7%
I
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-8

Table 2 (continued)
Municipality
1990
2000
% Change
Leland
1,801
1,938
7.6%
Navassa
445
479
7.6%
Northwest*
611
671
9.8%
Oak Island**
4,550
6,571
44.4%
Ocean Isle Beach
523
426
-18.5%
St. James*
—
804
—
Sandy Creek
243
246
1.2%
Shallotte
1,073
1,381
28.7%
Southport
2,369
2,351
-0.8%
Sunset Beach
311
1,824
486.5%
Varnamtown
404
481
19.1%
Incorporated
16,363
24,100
47.3%
Unincorporated
34,622
49,043
41.7%
County Total
50,985
73,143
43.5%
*These municipalities have incorporated since the 1990 Census. The figure shown for 1990 is a Census
separation count derived after incorporation and is not published in the 1990 Census reports.
**Incorporated July, 1999 following merger between Long Beach and Yaupon Beach.
Source: US Census Bureau.
2. Age Composition
Table 3 provides a breakdown of both the City of Southport and Brunswick County populations
by age group. These estimates were taken from the 1990 US Census. According to the table, the
fastest growing age group is the 65 and up bracket. Between 1980 and 1990, the number of
individuals within this age bracket increased by 12.1%, compared to 5.4% for Brunswick County
as a whole. This is a strong indicator that Southport is an increasingly desirable community for
retirees. The largest age group within Southport, as well as Brunswick County, is between 19-44
indicating a strong working age population.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-9

if
DTable 3
City of Southport and Brunswick County
n
Population Characteristics by Age Group
Percentage of Total Population
QSouthport
Brunswick County
Age Group
1980
1990 1995 1980
1990
1995
0-4
4.7%
4.8% 4.9% 7.4%
6.4%
6.2%
5-18
24.4%
15.7% 9.8% 24.6%
18.5%
16.8%
O19-44
31.8%
32.9% 33.5% 36.3%
36.1%
35.0%
45-64
21.4%
21.8% 22.0% 21.0%
24.4%
25.9%
65 and Up
17.7%
24.8% 29.8% 10.7%
14.6%
16.1 %
u
Total
100.0%
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
U Source: North Carolina State Data Center, Office of State Budget and Management; Holland Consulting
u Planners, Inc.
Q3. Racial and Gender Composition
O Table 4 provides a breakdown. of the percentage change in population by race and sex for
Southport and Brunswick County. Since 1980, Southport's male population has decreased by 5.8%
and the female population has increased by 5.8%. This increase makes the female population
Q comprise roughly 57% of the total population. This trend can also be seen within the population
for all of Brunswick County, but the shifts are not as drastic.
OOver the past twenty years, there has also been a shift in the percentage of white and non -white
population in Southport and Brunswick County. The racial composition of Southport compared
O with the county is very similar, although the non -white population is slightly higher within
Southport. There has been a slight increase in the white population (2.3%) and a slight decrease
in the non -white population (-2.3%) since 1980. The change in racial composition for Brunswick
I
0
County was slightly more substantial, with an increase in white population of 4.8% and a decrease
in non -white population of 2.3%.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-10

0
Male Population
Female Population
Total Population
White Population
Non -White Population
Total Population
Table 4
City of Southport and Brunswick County
Percentage Change in Population by Race and Sex
Percentage of Total Population
Southport Brunswick County
1980 1990 1995 1980 1990 1995
48.4% 44.4% 42.6% 49.2% 48.7% 48.7%
11
I
n
51.6% 55.6% 57.4% 50.8% 51.3% 51.3%
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% a
72.1% 73.6%
27.9% 26.4%
74.4%
25.6%
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
76.3% 81.0% 81.1 % 0
23.7% 19.0% 18.9%
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Q
Sources: North Carolina State Data Center, Office of State Budget and Management; Holland Consulting
Planners, Inc.
4. City of Southport Seasonal Population2
a. Introduction and Methodology
Although it is located close to several beach communities that experience major increases
in population due to the annual influx of overnight tourists and seasonal occupants, Southport
only experiences a moderate population increase during the summer months. Despite its distinct
waterfront character, Southport appears more like inland Brunswick communities such as
Shallotte and Bolivia than a beach community like Oak Island or Ocean Isle Beach in terms of
seasonal/permanent housing and population characteristics.
The methodology used in this study will closely follow a demographic analysis of
recreational population for the Albemarle -Pamlico region prepared by Paul D. Tschetter of East
Carolina University in 1988. The advantage of the ECU analysis is that it relies on an extensive
empirical enumeration of marine boat slips, motel rooms, and campgrounds in addition to private
seasonal housing units. The study also includes an excellent approach to estimating average
population by type of individual housing unit. For purposes of the ECU study (and this
demographic analysis), "total seasonal housing units" includes 1) all single- and multi -family
2This section does not address or include figures for "day -visitor" usage of Brunswick County recreational
facilities, beaches, waters, and natural areas. Thus, the actual daytime seasonal population figures are significantly
higher than those stated in this section. Accurate "day -visitor" data is not available.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-11

I
I
I
I
0
I
private housing units used by the overnight tourist population rather than the permanent
population; 2) all motel/hotel rooms (including bed and breakfasts); 3) all seasonal and transient
campground sites; and 4) all individual marina wet slips capable of docking boats of a size and
type which can house people overnight. Marina facilities.for fueling/repair only (no overnight
dockage), and those that only dock commercial fishing boats, are excluded from the enumeration
of seasonal housing units.
As in the ECU study, an enumeration of seasonal housing units was conducted to arrive
at the totals presented in Table 5. The figures for marina boat slips, motel rooms, and
campgrounds are up to date as of December, 2000. The figure utilized for the city's permanent
population has been provided by the Office of State Planning and reflects the 1999 population.
In addition, due to the lack of current data for private housing units, the figures from the 1990
U.S. Census have been substituted. Therefore, the figures provided in this plan for seasonal
population and peak seasonal population may be slightly low for 2000 since any growth in private
housing units from 1990-2000 and growth in the city's population from 1999-2000 have not been
considered.
Table 5
City of Southport*
Seasonal, Permanent, and Total Peak Population, 2000
2000**
Number
Persons
Seasonal
Housing Type
of Units
Per Unit
Population
Motel/Hotel
115
4
460
Campsites
0
0
0
Boat Slips
181
3.25[1]
588
Private Housing Units [2]
115
5
575
Total
411
1,623
Permanent Population
2,661
Peak Seasonal Population
1,623
Total Peak Population
43284
[1 ] Based on 85% occupancy rate. 100% used for all other categories.
[2] Includes units "vacant -held for occasional use" and 'other vacant" as classified by the 1990 U.S. Census.
* The figures included in this table are based on the city's incorporated area and do not include the
extraterritorial jurisdiction.
** The figures for Motel/Hotel, Campsites, and Boat Slips are current as of December, 2000. The most
recent data available for Private Housing Units is 1990 and Permanent Population,.1999.
Source: 1990 U.S. Census; North Carolina Office of State Planning; Holland Consulting Planners, Inc.
I
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-12

b. Seasonal Population
Table 5 illustrates that the City of Southport has a total of 411 seasonal units, a peak
seasonal population of 1,623, and a total peak 2000 population of 4,284. "Peak seasonal
population" can be defined as the population that would be enumerated in all seasonal housing
units if all of those units were occupied at full capacity, based on average assumed household
sizes for each type of unit (one exception is in marina boat slips where the ECU study suggests
an occupancy rate of 85%). Although "peak seasonal population" is based on a number of
variables, it is a very useful statistic for planning purposes, since it provides a logically derived
summary of the possible total occupancy in seasonal units during peak overnight tourism periods
(Memorial Day, Fourth of July, and Labor Day weekends). "Total peak population" is simply the
sum of the permanent population and peak seasonal population.
C. Day Visitors
Southport does attract large numbers of day visitors during the spring and summer
months, particularly on holiday weekends. These visitors place a temporary strain on law
enforcement personnel and the local transportation system. The city's police department has
estimated that on July 4, 2000, Southport attracted approximately 20,000 visitors. This figure
does not include approximately 45,000 visitors present at the city's fireworks display.
5. Housine Characteristics
According to the U.S. Bureau of the Census, in 1990, there were 1,160 housing units located
within the City of Southport. However, as previously discussed in the population section of this
plan, the City of Southport does not agree with the data provided in the 1990 Census relating to
Southport.
Southport's 1990 Land Use Plan included data on housing conditions provided by the Brunswick
County Planning Department. This data indicated that Southport had 1,357 total housing units
in 1988. Based on the fact that between 1988-90, there were 29 permits issued in Southport for
new residential construction and 32 residential units demolished, it can be concluded that in
1990 there were a total of 1,354 total housing units in Southport.
In order to provide the most accurate portrayal of housing conditions in Southport, the data
included in the following table has been slightly modified to reflect a total of 1,354 housing units.
Table 6 indicates that in 1990, Southport's housing stock consisted of 80% single-family dwellings,
16% multi -family, 1 % mobile homes, and 3% other. The percentage of single-family units in
Southport exceeded that of Brunswick County as a whole by approximately 21%.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-13

I
QTable
6
City of Southport and Brunswick County
O
Total Units by Structure Type, 1990
City of Southport
Brunswick County
Single detached unit 1,039 76%
20,472
55%
Single attached including row 55 4%
348
1%
2 to 4 units 174 13%
5 to 9 units 29 2%
1,400
559
4%
2%
10 to 19 units 14 1%
379
1%
20 to 49 units 0 0%
222
1%
50 units or more 0 0%
62
0%
O
Mobile home or trailer 8 1%
Other*
13,513
36%
35 3%
159
0%
Total Housing Units 1,354 100%
37,114
100%
*The
other category includes identified non -conventional housing such as
sheds or temporary shelters.
Source: 1990 U.S. Census and Holland Consulting Planners, Inc.
Table 7 shows that 200 or approximately 15% of Southport's total housing units were vacant in
1990. None of the vacant housing units were condominiums. Three percent (3%)
of the city's
ahousing
stock was for seasonal, recreational, or occasional use.
Table 7
City of Southport and Brunswick County
Housing/Vacant Units, 1990
City of Southport
Brunswick County
Total Housing Units 1,354 ---
Occupied 1,154 85%
37,114
20,069
---
54%
Owner occupied 809 60%
16,358
44%
Renter occupied 345 26%
3,711
10%
Vacant 200 15%
17,045
46%
Condominium 0 0%
1,190
3%
For rent 0 0%
307
1%
For sale only 0 0%
49
0%
O
For seasonal, recreational,
or occasional use 0 0%
813
2%
All other vacants 0 0%
21
0%
o
Not a condominium 200 15%
15,855
43%
For rent 50 4%
1,535
4%
For sale only 15 1%
716
2%
For seasonal, recreational,
or occasional use 34 3%
11,924
32%
All other vacants 101 7%
1,680
5%
Source: 1990 U.S. Census and Holland Consulting Planners, Inc.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan
1-14

Approximately 30% of the total housing units in Southport were constructed between 1970 and
1979. Forty-nine percent (49%) of the city's housing stock was 28 years of age or older in 1990.
In addition, only 9% of Southport's housing stock was less than 5 years of age in 1990 compared
to 25% for the county as a whole. Table 8 provides a summary of housing unit age for Southport
and Brunswick County.
While much of the city's older housing is well preserved and maintained, the city does have
several areas requiring redevelopment and/or rehabilitation in order to restore neighborhood
quality and increase property value. These areas have been primarily defined through the city's
ongoing community development effort. Most of the deteriorated housing throughout the city
is occupied by low-income households who are retired or unemployed and subsist on fixed
incomes.
Table 8
City of Southport and Brunswick County
Year Structure Built, 1990
City of Southport
Brunswick County
1989 to March 1990
22
2%
1,633
4%
1985 to 1988
96
7%
7,867
21%
1980to 1984
166
12%
8,102
22%
1970to 1979
406
30%
10,680
29%
1960 to 1969
162
12%
4,477
12%
1950to 1959
203
15%
2,264
6%
1940 to 1949
86
6%
1,154
3%
1939 or earlier
213
16%
937
3%
Total Housing Units
1,354
100%
37,114
100%
Source: 1990 U.S. Census and Holland Consulting Planners, Inc.
The median value of owner occupied housing units in Southport ($70,600) is nearly identical to
that of Brunswick County ($70,400) as a whole. In addition, Table 9 indicates that approximately
76% of Southport's owner occupied housing units were valued at less than $100,000 in 1990.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-15 0

I
I
I
ii
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 9
City of Southport and Brunswick County
Value of Owner Occupied Housing Units, 1990
City of Southport
Brunswick County
Less than $15,000
15
2%
360
4%
$15,000-$34,999
64
9%
943
10%
$35,000-$59,999
229
31%
2,398
25%
$60,000-$99,999
253
34%
3,297
35%
$100,000-$149,999
85
12%
1,518
16%
$150,000-$199,999
34
5%
542
6%
$200,000-$249,999
33
4%
135
1%
$250,000 or more
22
3%
217
3%
Total Housing Units
735
100%
9,410
100%
Median Value
$70,600
$70,400
Source: 1990 U.S. Census and Holland Consulting Planners, Inc.
Between 1997 and 2000, 131 building permits were issued for new construction. As a result, in
December 2000, there were approximately 1,519 housing units in Southport.
6. Economy
There are no sources of economic data for the City of Southport more recent than the 1990 US
Census. Therefore, a significant portion of this section has been taken from the City of Southport
1997 Land Use Plan. Where available, more recent data has been provided.
a. Regional Economy
Over. the past ten years, the state of Brunswick County's economy may be described as
better than average when compared to the economies of all of the state's counties. According
to the Economic Development Yearbook for North Carolina, produced by Problem -Solving
Research, Inc., Brunswick County received a rank of 415L out of 100 North Carolina counties in
terms of economic growth and development between the years 1986-1996. The following
provides a summary, as stated in the Economic Development Yearbook, of the methodology used
to arrive at the composite rankings found in Table 10.
'The Composite Rankings were created to compare the characteristics of growth between
the 100 counties in North Carolina. Three rankings are provided. The one year ranking
provides a short term picture of growth. It consists of an overview of the present health
of the county coupled with the county's 1994-1995 economic performance. The five year
ranking provides a mid-term view of economic development. Like the one year ranking,
it assesses the present health of the county but couples the assessment with the county's
0
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-16

1991-1996 economic variation. The ten year index provides a long-term view of growth.
This final measure assesses the present health of the county with the county's 1986-1996
growth and development.
The Composite Ranking of Economic Development is a broadly defined measure of relative
economic well-being. Its construction has two major parts. First, it is composed of four
measures that describe the economic health of an area at a particular point in time. Each
of these components provides a unique gauge of the county's most recent annual economic
health. Second, the ranking is composed of five measures of economic change. Thus, the
Composite Ranking considers the present well-being of the county and how the local
economy has improved from one point to the next.
The nine components of the Composite Ranking are arranged according to five general
areas:
ABILITY TO CREATE JOBS
• Change in Employment measures the area's ability to create jobs.
ABILITY TO EARN AN ADEQUATE INCOME
• Per Capita Income measures the level of income from the wages It salaries and
other forms of income generating activity (such as investments and owner profit).
• Change in Per Capita Income demonstrates the increase in income between
two points in time. Although this measure is correlated with the growth in jobs,
a pace of change in per capita income that tags the pace of job growth implies
that the area is adding lower paying jobs.
ABILITY TO KEEP THE LOCAL LABOR FORCE EMPLOYED
• Unemployment Rate measures the percentage of the population that is willing
to work but is unable to obtain employment.
• Change in the Unemployment Rate measures the improvement in an
individual's ability to find work from one period to the next.
ABILITY TO ATTRACT INCOME FROM OTHER REGIONS
• Per Capita Retail Sales measures the ability of an area to attract persons to a
county to shop and play, thereby demonstrating the regional importance of a local
area.
• Change in Per Capita Retail Sales measures how the relative attractiveness of
an area for shopping and play has changed over time.
ABILITY TO REDUCE POVERTY
• Per Capita Food Stamp Recipients serves as a proxy for a poverty index. It
shows the relative number of persons that are unable to adequately support
themselves or their families.
• Change in Per Capita Food Stamp Recipients shows how the level of poverty
has changed over time.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-17
0

I
0
I
The Composite Rankings are created by assigning equal weights to the nine components
of development. First, the measure's nine components are computed for each county in
North Carolina. Second, within each component the counties are ranked from most
positive to most negative and assigned a ranking from 1 to 100. The average of the nine
rankings is tabulated and ranked from top to bottom. The Composite Ranking is this final
result."
The composite rankings for the twenty Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) regulated
counties, as found in the Economic Development Yearbook, have been included in Table 10.
Table 10
0 CAMA Regulated Counties
One, Five, and Ten -Year Composite Rankings of Economic Development
0
I
0
I
11
I
Beaufort
Bertie
Brunswick
Camden
Carteret
Chowan
Craven
Currituck
Dare
Gates
Hertford
Hyde
New Hanover
Onslow
Pamlico
Pasquotank
Pender
Perquimans
Tyrrell
Washington
One -Year
1994-1995
State
CAMA
Rank
Rank
53
11
94
20
19
4
77
16
9
2
88
19
19
5
14
3
31
7
66
13
86
18
74
15
1
1
35
9
72
14
33
8
27
6
41
10
56
12
83
17
Five -Year
1991-1996
State
CAMA
Rank
Rank
88
16
93
20
58
9
79
13
23
2
91
19
56
8
21
1
31
4
82
15
74
11
89
17
23
3
48
6
79
14
76
12
41
5
48
7
68
10
90
18
Ten -Year
1986-1996
State CAMA
Rank Rank
Note: State rank out of 100 total counties and CAMA rank out of 20 total counties.
Source: Economic Development Yearbook for North Carolina, 1997.
88
97
41
79
29
91
69
33
23
53
85
63
8
83
54
87
28
66
48
90
17
20
6
13
4
19
12
5
3
8
15
10
1
14
9
16
2
11
7
18
I
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan I-18

The status of Brunswick County's economy fares much more favorably when compared to
the economics of the twenty CAMA regulated counties rather then the economies of all of the
counties within the entire state. Out of the three periods included in Table 10, Brunswick County
received its highest ranking for the one-year period 1994-1995.
b. Brunswick County Economy and Employment
Brunswick County's changes in wages between 1997-1998, 1997 per capita income, and
1998 average annual wage trailed those of North Carolina as a whole. Brunswick County's 1997
business failure rate, 1997 new business rate, and 1998 unemployment rate exceeded those
experienced by North Carolina as a whole. Table 11 provides a summary of economic conditions
in the county.
Table 11
Brunswick County
Economic Conditions
Indicator
Years
Brunswick County
North Carolina
Real Wages Change
1997-1998
1.8%
3.3%
Business Failure Rate
1997
15.9%
13.9%
New Business Rate
1997
17.2%
15.1%
Unemployment Rate
1998
5.3%
3.5%
Per Capita Income
1997
$17,978
$20,217
Average Annual Wage
1998
$24,804
$25,902
Cash Receipts from Agriculture, 1997
Category
County Per
Capita
State Per
Capita
% of County
Total
% of State
Total
Crops, Total
$276
$465
50.1 %
42.2%
Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry
$270
$626
49.0%
56.8%
Total Farm Income
$551
$1,102
100.0%
100.0%
Travel and Tourism, 1997
Indicator
Total
Per Capita
County
Score
Travel Spending
$194,570,000
$3,004
7
Travel Wages
$42,360,000
$654
9
Travel Employment
3,500
54.0 (per 1,000 people)
9
Source: North Carolina Department of Commerce.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-19

0
I
I
I
I
0
I
0
IN
Ill
I
I
Brunswick County's labor force is highly concentrated in retail trade which comprises 22%
of total employment. The government (18%), services (17.2%), and manufacturing (13.4%)
employment sectors also employ large segments of the county's labor force. Table 12 provides
employment and wages by sector for Brunswick County.
Table 12 -
Brunswick County
Employment and Wages
97-98 %
97-98 %
1998
% of Cnty
% of NC
Chg Cnty
Chg NC
98 Annual
% of NC
Sector
Employment
Emp
Emp
Emp
Emp
Avg Wage
Avg Wage
Agriculture
277
1.4%
1.3%
1.5%
7.2%
$16,765
92.7%
Construction
1,873
9.2%
5.6%
1.0%
8.7%
$20,590
77.4%
Finan/Ins/Real Est
1,635
8.1%
4.5%
3.7%
6.8%
$19,458
51.0%
Government
3,640
18.0%
15.4%
6.1%
2.9%.
$24,923
90.3%
Manufacturing
2,720
13.4%
23.0%
3.2% .
-1.1%
$39,132
125.7%
Services
3,485
17.2%
22.3%
3.8%
6.1%
$18,010
72.6%
Wholesale Trade
256
1.3%
5.1%
-12.0%
4.6%
$21,093
58.5%
Retail Trade
4,458
22.0%
18.0%
3.4%
3.2%
$12,419
82.7%
Trans/Comm/Pub Util
1,910
9.4%
4.6%
-11.2%
2.1%
$42,879
118.9%
Total
20,265
100.0%
100.0%
1.9%
3.3%
$23,860
89.5%
Source: North Carolina Department of Commerce.
The significance of the county's retail trade sector is further evidenced by Table 13 which
provides retail sales by month for the years 1994, 1996, and 1998. As anticipated, July and
August are the most profitable months for retail sales in the county.
Table 13
Brunswick County
Retail Sales
1994
1996
1998
January
$28,568,438
$35,711,833
$48,530,471
February
$26,886,388
$35,254,116
$38,730,852
March
$31,541,308
$25,233,767
$41,195,973
April
$33,721,099
$47,925,984
$55,757,299
May
$43,365,507
$47,888,462
$60,529,597
June
$44,419,307
$55,526,289
$61,217,428
July
$52,387,556
$65,529,608
$78,827,064
August
$60,227,477
$71,687,615
$77,973,969
September
$47,571,209
$59,707,772
$76,416,064
I
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-20

Table 13 (continued)
1994 1996 1998
October $42,231,173 $45,931,550 $62,701,214
November $38,991,607 $51,281,701 $56,634,923
December $32,669,798 $43,921,760 $48,583,230
Source: Brunswick County Economic Development Commission (BCEDC).
As previously discussed, in 1998, Brunswick County's workforce consisted of 20,265
persons. The largest employer in the county is the Brunswick County Board of Education followed
by DuPont and Carolina Power It Light. Table 14 provides the top 10 employers in Brunswick
County.
Table 14
Brunswick County
Top Ten Employers
Employer
Number of Employees
Brunswick County Board of Education
1,300
E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company, Inc.
1,100
Carolina Power it Light Company
1,000
Brunswick County
667
Brunswick Community Hospital
300
Sunny Point Military Terminal
300
Dosher Memorial Hospital
200
Victaulic Company of America
185
Archer Daniels Midland Company
165
Armada, Inc.
120
Source: BCEDC.
The following provides a summary of strengths and weaknesses which influence the
county's economy.
Strengths Weaknesses
Available industrial park sites with utilities Location/transportation access
Large available labor force Limited water and sewer distribution system
Modern industrial training center Poor public education system
Moderate tax rates
High quality of life
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-21

0 C. Local Economy
0 As indicated in Table 15, median per capita income in Southport ranged well above the
Brunswick County median, and close to the North Carolina median, in 1985 and 1990.
OTable 15
City of Southport, Brunswick County, and North Carolina
Median Per Capita Income, 1985-1990
1985 1990
(� City of Southport $9,303 $12,821
U Brunswick County $8,169 $11,688
0 North Carolina $9,517 $12,885
Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census.
The higher per capita income in Southport compared to Brunswick County is indicative of
the fact that many government personnel, skilled industry employees, teachers, other
professionals, and self-employed businessmen reside in the city. A very small percentage (6%)
of individuals enumerated in the 1990 census for Southport worked in semi -skilled manufacturing
n jobs, approximately 25% worked in professional and related services. Table 16 provides a
u summary of employment by occupation for the years 1980 and 1990.
Table 16
City of Southport
Employed Persons 16 Years and Older By Industry, 1980 and 1990
0
Ill
I
I
Occupation
% Employed 1980
% Employed 1990
Agriculture, forestry, mining
0%
0%
Construction
8%
1%
Manufacturing:
Nondurable goods
6%
2%
Durable goods
0%
4%
Transportation
2%
1 %
Communication, other public utilities
13%
15%
Wholesale trade
2%
2%
Retail trade
16%
17%
Finance, insurance, and real estate
5%
8%
Business and repair services
3%
4%
Personal, entertainment, and recreational services
7%
8%
Ell
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-22

Table 16 (continued)
Occupation % Employed 1980 % Employed 1990
Professional and related services:
Health services 8% 11%
Educational services 10% 9%
Other professional and related services 4% 5%
Public Administration 12% 11%
Fishing *5% **2%
Total Employed 100% 100%
* The 1980 U.S. Census survey did not provide a count of those employed in the fishing industry. However,
based upon local estimates, approximately 5% of Southport's employed persons work in the fishing industry.
City officials felt that the number of persons employed in educational services occupations as reported by
the Census was high; thus, this figure was reduced to show 5% in the fishing industry category.
** It should be noted that this table includes only insured employment. Much of the employment in the
commercial fishing occupation is not reported and not reflected in this percentage. In addition, this
percentage does not take into consideration persons employed on -shore in fishing -related activities.
Source: 1990 Southport Land Use Plan and 1990 U.S. Census.
Higher incomes stemming from the status of Southport as a "bedroom community" for
industry -related professionals and skilled employees, and teachers and government personnel,
has several effects on the local economy. First, housing costs and the general cost of living have
tended to be higher in Southport than in most of Brunswick County in recent years. This has
placed a burden on those living on fixed incomes. it has also restricted in -migration by young
non-professional couples and single wage earners, and contributed to the net reduction of the
black population in the city. Both of these demographic trends were discussed in the population
section.
The City of Southport's economy is also highly reliant on tourism as evidenced by the high
percentage of individuals employed in the retail trade occupational sectors (17%). In addition,
the number of people visiting the Southport 2000 Visitor Center provides a good indicator of the
impact of tourism on the city. Between 1998 and 2000, visitors to the Visitor's Center increased
29%. The following provides a brief summary of visitation at the Center: 1997 - 24,462 visitors
(10-month period); 1998 - 42,387 visitors; 1999 - 44,436 visitors; and 2000 - 54,864 visitors.
Furthermore, the city's police department estimated that on July 4, 2000, Southport attracted
approximately 20,000 visitors (this figure does not include those present for the fireworks
display). Although there are no figures available indicating approximately how many dollars are
brought into the city as a result of tourism, based on retail trade employment and visitation data,
it is known to be extremely significant. The City of Southport views tourism as an important
contributor to the local economy and supports continued development of the tourist industry.
I
I
I
I
if
1_1
I
fll
0
0
r!"
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-23

7
Positive economic results of higher per capita income and a generally "white collar"
working population in Southport include low unemployment, a stable municipal tax base, and the
n preservation of a quiet, residential way of life. Many contemporary urban problems such as a
(� high crime rate, decay of the central business district, and increasing poverty and housing
deterioration in low-income, minority areas are not as prevalent in Southport as in many
Osimilarly -sized eastern North Carolina cities. Additionally, the city has been able to directly
address its more pressing urban problems largely because of, its stable tax base and generally
well-educated labor force. (Based on 1990 census data, 48% of Southport's over-25 population
had attended at least one year of college.)
D The number of individuals below poverty level is an important indicator of the economic
health of a community. The table'below defines poverty status for individuals in Southport in
1990.
oTable 17
City of Southport
Poverty Status, 1980 and 1990*
I
I
III
I
a
it
Income Level
1980
1990
Income below 75% of poverty level
166 (6.1%)
192 (8.5%)
Income between 75% and 124% of poverty level
372 (13.7%)
178 (7.8%)
Income between 125% and 149% of poverty level
103 (3.8%)
122 (5.4%)
Income between 150% and 199% of poverty level
292 (10.8%)
148 (6.5%)
Income 200% of poverty level and above
1,777(66.6%)
1,630 (71.8%)
Total enumerated by poverty status
2,710 (100%)
2,270 (100%)
*For a family of four, poverty level is $17,463.
Source: 1990 Southport Land Use Plan and 1990 U.S. Census.
Table 17 indicates that, despite the relatively high percentage of individuals in Southport
living in households with incomes considerably above the poverty level, a considerable number
of individuals are still living in poverty. The percentage of non -white population below the
poverty level (24%) was much higher than the percentage of whites below the poverty level (9%)
in 1990 (Source: 1990 U. S. Census).
Social programs and community redevelopment efforts continue to improve living
conditions for Southport's lower -income populace. However, improving the economic well-being
of the hard-core unemployed in Southport has been a difficult problem due to the lack of local
farming and manufacturing industry capable of sustaining an unskilled available work force.
Table 18 provides a summary of manufacturing firms located within Southport's planning
jurisdiction.
11
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-24

Table 18
City of Southport and Surrounding Area
Major Manufacturing Firms, 2000
Firm
Address
Established
Product
Employees
Cogentrix Carolina
P.O. Box 10836
1987
Cogeneration Plant
10
Leasing
Southport, NC 28461
Archer Daniels
P.O. Box 10640
1976
Citric Acid, Beet Molasses,
165
Midland Company
Southport, NC 28461
Lime, and Perlite
Godwin Concrete
1619 Howe Street
Ready -Mix Concrete
5
Company, Inc.
Southport, NC 28461
Carolina Power Ft
P.O. Box 10429
1971
Electric Power Generation,
1,000
Light Company
Southport, NC 28461
Transmission, and
Distribution
Sea Way Printing
4130 Long Beach Rd.
1958
Commercial Printing
6
Southport, NC 28461
Caroon Crab
8249 River Road
1965
Crab Meat, Deviled Crabs,
36
Company, Inc. (ETJ)
Southport, NC 28461
Crabs ft Fish, Fillet Fish, and
Crab Cakes
State Port Pilot
105 S. Howe Street
1928
Newspaper and Newsprint
12
Southport, NC 28461
Source: Brunswick County Economic Development Commission.
F. EXISTING LAND USE
Land use within Southport's planning jurisdiction continues to be dominated by single-family
residential uses. However, since 1998, there has been significant commercial development.
Concentrations of commercial development are located in the central business district, along
Howe Street, around the intersection of NC 87 and NC 211, and marine -related commercial uses
in the State Ports Authority small boat harbor area. A few examples of the commercial
construction that has taken place include the Wal-Mart Plaza, Kerr Drugs, and Southport
Mercantile.
Table 19 provides an analysis of land uses by category for Southport and its extraterritorial
jurisdiction. Map 2 illustrates existing land use in Southport. This data was obtained via a
windshield survey conducted in September, 2000.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-25

11

Table 19
City of Southport
Existing Land Uses, September 2000
City
Acres
ETJ
Total Planning
Jurisdiction
Developed:
Commercial
79.3
31.7
111.0
Commercial -Water Dependent
44.8
0.0
44.8
Multi -Family Residential
51.0
6.7
57.7
Public Et Institutional
62.6
3.9
66.5
Parks Et Open Space
91.5
3.6
95.1
Transportation Et Utility
272.8
131.3
404.1
Single -Family Residential
395.5
151.2
546.7
Industrial
0.0
124.9
124.9
Subtotal Developed
997.5
453.3
1,450.8
vacant
533.3
1,413.1
1,946.4
Total
1,530.8
1,866.4
3,397.2
NOTE: The acreage estimates provided were derived using a Geographic Information
System. This is the first time that land use estimates have been calculated for Southport
in this fashion. Therefore, it is not possible to compare these estimates to those included
in previous land use plans.
Source:. Holland Consulting Planners, Inc.
Approximately 43% of Southport's planning jurisdiction is developed. As a result, there are
1,946.4 acres in the planning jurisdiction that are vacant and potentially suitable for
development. It cannot be assumed that all of the remaining vacant land in. Southport is
developable due to the presence of 404 wetlands.
Out of the total developed acreage (997.5) in Southport's incorporated area, approximately 40%
is single-family residential; 27% transportation and utility; 8% commercial; 6% public and
institutional; and 19% commercial -water dependent, parks and open space, and multi -family
residential combined.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-27

1. Annexation
Since 1998, the City of Southport has annexed approximately 190 acres. Annexation has occurred
to the northeast between East Leonard Street and Old River Road, north of Ferry Road, near the
intersection of NC 211 /Howe Street and NC 133, and along Robert Ruark Drive. All of the
annexations near the NC 211 /NC 133 intersection have been satellite annexations, one being the
31.7 acre Wal-Mart Plaza area. Out of the 190 acres that have been annexed, approximately 84
acres are zoned C-2, 48 acres are zoned R-1, <1 acre is zoned RA-20, 48 acres are zoned R-2, and
9 acres are zoned OS. All of these areas were undeveloped when annexed and, therefore, did
not produce an immediate population increase for the city. However, as areas zoned for R-1 and
R-2 uses are subdivided, opportunities for residential development and associated population
increase will arise.
2. Urban and Developed Land
a. Residential
A few of the major subdivisions in Southport include Smithville Woods (located in ETJ),
Indigo Plantation, Harbor Oaks, Forest Oaks, River Landing, Old Southport, and Turtlewood. Old
Southport and Turtlewood are the city's newest subdivisions and, at the time this plan was
drafted, had not been developed. However, these subdivisions will accommodate some of the
city's residential growth in the not too distant future.
In December2000, there were approximately 1,500 housing units in Southport's corporate
limits occupying approximately 420 acres. As a result, there was approximately 0.28 acres
developed for each housing unit in Southport. Within the ETJ area, the most significant
concentration of single-family residential development has occurred in Smithville Woods. Indigo
Plantation, Forest Oaks, Harbor Oaks, and River Landing have experienced the most significant
single-family residential growth within the incorporated area of Southport.
Between January 1996. and November 2000, there were 137 residential housing units
permitted in Southport's planning jurisdiction. The average cost per housing unit during this 5-
year period was $122,184. The busiest year during the period of record was 1998 when 47
housing units were permitted. Table 20 provides a summary of residential and commercial
building permit activity between 1996-2000.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-28 0

Table 20
City of Southport
Building Permit Activity*
Residential
Commercial
Year
Number of Permits Dollar Amount
Number of Permits Dollar Amount
1996
6
$793,232
0
$0
1997
18
$2,034,161
2
$342,500
1998
47
$6,222,890
2
$312,000
1999
41
$4,812,765
17
$12,984,460
2000**
28
$2,876,155
6
$1,712,150
Total
137
27
*Represents all building permit activity in excess of $50,000.
**Year 2000 data is through November (TO BE UPDATED).
Source:
There are approximately 47 acres of multi -family residential development in Southport's
planning jurisdiction of which 52% is located within the incorporated area. The most recent
multi -family development is the Village at Southport.
Single-family residential usage within the city's incorporated area has benefitted greatly
from Community Development comprehensive revitalization projects. The neighborhoods
containing the units are more stable as a result of these improvements. However, substandard
housing conditions continue to exist along Lord Street and portions of northwest Rhett Street.
The Southport Historic District, as recorded in the National Register, extends from the
Cape Fear River at Kingsley Street west to the boat basin and northwest to West Street. The area
contains approximately 100 homes, the majority of which have some historic and architectural
significance. The area remains primarily intact, not having suffered many intrusions from new
residential or commercial developments.
ab. Commercial
There is a total of 155 acres of commercial development in Southport's planning
jurisdiction. However, commercial development in Southport can be separated into that which
is water dependent and that which is not. Water dependent commercial uses occupy 45 acres
and non -water dependent commercial uses occupy 110 acres. All water dependent commercial
uses are located within the incorporated area of Southport.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-29

As previously discussed, commercial development is concentrated in the central business
district, along Howe Street, and at the NC211 /NC87 intersection. Map 3 provides the boundaries
of the city's Central Business District (CBD). Historically, this area served as the core of the city
and the center for social and economic activity. This area should not be confused with the city's
C-1 Central Business Zoning District which extends north along Howe Street to the West 10tn
Street intersection.
As early as 1979, the city began to focus on downtown redevelopment through preparation
of the Southport Downtown and Waterfront Revitalization Plan. The 1985 Land Use Plan re-
emphasized the need for central business district revitalization. Since 1985, the emphasis has
been continued by the Southport Economic Development Commission. The city's commitment
toward downtown revitalization has greatly improved its appearance. As a result, the city is
attracting more and more visitors to its downtown each year. The city will continue to
implement its revitalization plans to ensure the continued success of its "reborn" CBD.
Another land use issue relevant to commercial zoning is the fact that there is no zoning
district which caters specifically to office uses. Office uses are permitted in all three of the
city's commercial zoning districts. Office uses commonly serve as a buffer between commercial
and residential areas. This practice is difficult to accomplish in Southport because a separate
office district does not exist.
Commercial activity in Southport's planning jurisdiction has accelerated in recent years.
As previously provided in Table 20, there were 27 building permits issued for commercial
development during the past five years. Twenty-three (23) of these permits were issued during
the last two years (1999-2000). Southport's greatest challenge during the next five years may
be providing for orderly, well planned commercial development, in the right amount and in the
right locations. Southport should also be sensitive to existing residential development by
discouraging the infringement of commercial uses into these areas.
C. Industrial
Industrial development within the Southport planning jurisdiction has been extremely
limited. Currently, within the city's incorporated area, no land is zoned for industrial usage.
However, the extraterritorial area includes some industrial zoning and industrial development.
Archer Daniels Midland Company, formerly Pfizer, Inc., has been located on North Moore Street
Extension since the 1970s and processes citric acid for commercial usage. The plant employs
approximately 165 people.
P
J1
I
I
I
11
I
I
I
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-30
I

MAP 3
I
a
I
I
J
City of Southport
Central Business District
I -'aDt
NN St
r
Nam
300 0 300 Feet
The preparation of this document was financed in part through a
grant provided by the North Carolina Coastal Management
Program, through funds provided by the Coastal Zone Management
Act of 1972, as amended, which is administered by the Office
of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.
(CBD)
Central Business District
PAGE 1-31

I
Since 1985, a second industry has located within the extraterritorial area. Cogentrix is
located on Leonard Street opposite the Archer Daniels property. The plant is a cogeneration
facility that sells steam to the Archer Daniels Midland Company and electricity to Carolina Power
Et Light. A portion of the CPEtL property is located on the northern edge of the city's ETJ. These
two plants are the most significant in terms of physical size and occupy approximately 125 acres
awithin the city's extraterritorial area.
The City of Southport does not anticipate significant industrial development to occur in
the immediate future. Therefore, there is no demand at the present time to expand areas
currently zoned for industrial uses or to address industrial related land use issues. However,
D careful planning will be required to prevent land use conflicts as residential development
encroaches on established industries.
ad. Public and Institutional
R There have been no major changes in institutional land use within the City of Southport
Uor its extraterritorial area since 1997. However, the Dosher Memorial Hospital has undergone
several expansions adjacent to its existing site on Howe Street and the Southport Community
Building was constructed at 223 East Bay Street. There are currently 66 acres of public
institutional land uses within Southport's planning area. Approximately 94% of the total acres
developed for public and institutional uses are located within the incorporated area of Southport.
It should be noted that the Southport -Fort Fisher Ferry Landing is included within the institutional
land use category.
e. Transportation/Public Utilities
This category includes all roadways, utility holdings, city -owned services such as water
and sewer lines, and electric utility systems. . The most significant change in
transportation/utilities acreage in recent years was due to the construction of the new Bald Head
OIsland Ferry Terminal, occupying approximately 25 acres. This acreage was not included in the
Institutional Land Use category because it is privately -owned and operated. As a result, there
are currently approximately 273 acres developed for transportation/utility usage within the city's
incorporated area. An additional 131 acres are located within the city's ETJ.
a A significant land use issue relevant to transportation is the provision of right-of-way
easements necessary to carry out the completion of the city's Thoroughfare Plan. As vacant
areas are developed, opportunities for new thoroughfares are diminished.
I
I
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-32

f. Vacant Land
Presently, vacant land occupies approximately 42% of the city's incorporated area and 72%
of the city's ETJ. Approximately 1,979 acres within the city's planning jurisdiction are vacant.
However, due to development constraints such as the presence of 404 wetlands, all of the
remaining vacant land cannot be assumed to be developable.
3. Land Use Compatibility Analysis
The City of Southport is beginning to experience a steady increase in development city-wide.
A side effect of rapid land development in any area is increased land use conflict. A land use
conflict may be defined as adjacent parcels of land where the development of one lot adversely
impacts the other. For example, a residential subdivision beside an industrial plant or a school
beside a major highway would both have the potential to create land use conflicts. The main
reason Southport has not experienced significant problems from unplanned development is that
the city's "small town" relaxed and friendly atmosphere has kept conflicts to a minimum.
However, as development continues in Southport and the population increases, land use conflicts
may become an increasingly significant issue for the city. The following provides a summary of
these issues:
a. Preservation of Established Residential Areas vs. Commercial Development
Particularly along the Lord Street corridor, there has been increasing pressure to re -zone
from residential to commercial districts. Commercial infringement into established residential
neighborhoods can damage the appearance of the neighborhood, diminish community pride, and
cause unsafe traffic conditions for both motorists and pedestrians. Re -zoning adjacent to
residential uses, particularly those in conflict with the future land use map contained in this
plan, should be done with great caution.
b. Protection of Water Quality (Surface Water and Groundwater) as Development
Increases
A major concern of any municipality as increasing growth begins to take place is
maintaining the quality of the area's water resources. This concern addresses both the
preservation of existing surface waters as well as groundwater supply. As development continues
to progress, a variety of issues will begin to play a role in affecting the water quality. if the
county allows industries which do not operate using environmentally conscious production
measures then a decline in water quality could take place. Another concern which will have an
impact on surface water is pollution stemming from runoff. Development increases impervious
surface coverage which decreases the land area available for rainwater infiltration, and increases
the degree and volume of runoff into streams, lakes, and rivers. This runoff often carries
pollutants. High density residential development can pollute surrounding bodies of surface water
from the runoff of fertilizers and pesticides.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-33

IF]
I
0
I
0
I
I
I
C. Preservation of Open Space
Southport has always existed as a small city with beautiful vistas, a sense of community,
and significant amounts of open space. Maintaining character and open space are definitely
concerns that exist and will continue to be significant issues as development pressures continue.
It will be difficult to address these issues in certain parts of Southport where commercial growth
will be focused. Certain measures can be taken to structure this growth so that the atmosphere
of the city is maintained. One method of shaping development to achieve this goal is
concentrating commercial and industrial development in specific areas and requiring on -site
natural buffers during subdivision review process. In addition, the city can consider providing
land dedication requirements in its subdivision ordinance to preserve open space. Areas which
may be unsuitable for development such as 404 wetlands, floodplains, and natural heritage areas
also present opportunities for the preservation of open space. These areas which may be
unsuitable for development are discussed further in the Development Constraints: Land
Suitability section of this plan. Finally, the city could pursue the development of a landscape
ordinance that would include buffer requirements, tree and vista preservation/protection, and
vegetative requirements. In the coming years, Southport may not be able to maintain the degree
of open space and forested areas that residents are accustomed to, but measures can be taken
to maintain the character of the city.
4. Basinwide Water Quality Management
The North Carolina Division of Water Quality has initiated a basinwide approach to state water
quality management. The overall goal of basinwide management is to develop consistent and
effective long range water quality management strategies that protect the quality and intended
uses of North Carolina's surface waters while accommodating population increases and economic
growth.
Basinwide management is not a new regulatory program. Rather, it is a watershed -based
amanagement approach which features basinwide permitting of discharges, integration of existing
point and nonpoint source regulatory programs, and preparation of basinwide water quality
management plans for each of the state's 17 river basins. Plans will be updated at five year
intervals.
The purpose of the basinwide management plan is to communicate to policy makers, the
regulated community, and the general public, the state's rationale, approaches, and long-term
strategies for each basin. In general, this process involves the following five major phases of
Odevelopment:
�= Collecting pertinent water quality and related information,
Analyzing the information and targeting problem areas,
-- Developing management strategies,
O-- Circulating a draft plan for public review and comment, and
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-34

-- Finalizing the plan.
Eight of North Carolina's major river basins cross the coastal area: Lumber, Cape Fear, White
Oak, Neuse, Tar -Pamlico, Roanoke, Chowan, and Pasquotank. The Division of Water Quality has
further subdivided these basins into smaller "sub -basins," which are currently used as the
foundation for their basinwide water quality plans. Even smaller watersheds were recently
delineated for the entire state by the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. These
watersheds are referred to as "14-digit hydrologic units" (because of the unique 14-digit code
assigned to each watershed) or simply "small watersheds." These small watersheds generally
range in size from 5,000 to 50,000 acres.
Brunswick County includes two separate river basins (Cape Fear and Lumber) and three separate
sub -basins (03-06-17, 03-07-57, and 03-07-59). Each sub -basin is further divided into several
small watersheds. The City of Southport's planning jurisdiction is located entirely within the
Cape Fear River basin, sub -basin 03-06-17, and small watershed 03030005070010. The Cape Fear
basinwide management plan was completed in 1995.
The long-range basinwide management goal is to provide a means of addressing the complex
problem of planning for reasonable economic growth while protecting and/or restoring the
quality and intended uses of the Cape Fear Basin's surface waters.
In striving towards the long-range goal stated above, the Division of Water Quality's highest
priority near -term goals will be the following:
-- Identify and restore the most seriously impaired waters in the basin;
-- Protect those waters known to be of the highest quality or supporting biological
communities of special importance;
-- Manage problem pollutants, particularly nutrients, biological oxygen demand and
sediment and fecal coliform, in order to correct existing water quality problems
and to ensure protection of those waters currently supporting their uses.
Because the City of Southport and its ETJ are located entirely within small watershed
03030005070010, a map illustrating the watershed boundary is not necessary.
5. Existing Land Use Issues
The City of Southport has maintained a comprehensive planning program in both the city's
corporate limits and the extraterritorial jurisdiction area. This has included careful
administration of the city's zoning and subdivision regulations. As a result, many land use
problems confronting municipalities have been averted. However, the city is currently working
with a Subdivision Ordinance which has not been updated in over ten years and a Zoning
Ordinance which was adopted in 1973. Combined with the fact that development pressures are
greater than ever, there is a need to address several land use related issues.
0
I
I
I
y
11
I
I �
I
J
I
11
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-35
0

0
aThrough citizen participation and input from Board of Aldermen and Planning Board members,
the following prioritized list of the city's top ten land use issues has been developed. A
O comprehensive list of all the issues identified during the development of this plan is provided in
Appendix II.
Rank Issue
1
Preserve city's character
0
2
Careful gateway plan
3
Re -write zoning ordinance
0
4
Preservation of fragile areas
5
Affordable quality of life
0
6
Establish historic commission
7
Preserve trees on city property
0
8
9
Preserve residential areas
Establish landscape
ordinance
10
Alternative truck route
0
These issues are addressed in the Land Development Policies and Implementing Actions section
of this plan.
6. Existing Ordinances and Land Use Controls
The city maintains a comprehensive program of building, land use, and municipal services
0 control. The city is adequately staffed, with a total of approximately 50 employees. The major
u positions include City Manager, Finance Officer, Building Inspector, Public Works Director,
Recreation Director, and Police Chief.
a. Zoning Ordinance
The City of Southport has had a zoning ordinance continuously in effect since 1973. The
ordinance has been amended several times and was revised in October, 1996. The ordinance
includes mobile home park regulations, off-street parking requirements, and conditional use
provisions. With the assistance of the city Building Inspector and the city's planning consultant,
the ordinance is administered by the city's planning board. Variances and appeals are received
and processed by the city's Board of Adjustment.
7
0
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-36

b. Commercial Design and Development Standards
The City of Southport adopted Commercial Design and Development Standards in
September, 1999. These standards are provided in Article V, Section J of the Southport Zoning
Ordinance. It is the intent of these standards and guidelines to promote and maintain natural
resources, historical areas, and corridors of the city in order to maintain the overall character
of the city.
C. Subdivision Ordinance
The city's first subdivision ordinance was adopted on July 19, 1973. The ordinance was
completely redrafted in 1989. The ordinance is administered by the city's Planning Board with
the administrative assistance of the Building Inspector and the city's planning consultant.
d. Planned Residential Development Ordinance
The city adopted the planned residential development ordinance in August, 1984. The
ordinance allows planned development districts in concert with the city's zoning ordinance.
Specific performance standards for public facilities, drainage, and streets are provided. The
planned residential development ordinance allows marinas, specialty shops, and restaurants as
conditional uses, but prohibits other commercial uses.
e. Master Drainage Plan
In 1983, the City of Southport prepared a comprehensive drainage master plan. The plan
identifies and analyzes the major drainage basins in the city and provides a recommended capital
improvements program. This plan was funded, in part, with a Coastal Area Management Act
Planning Grant.
f. North Carolina State Building Code
The City of Southport employs a full-time building inspector. The inspector enforces the
North Carolina State Building Code for all new construction and rehabilitation.
g. Federal Flood Insurance Program
The City of Southport participates in the Federal Emergency Management Flood program.
The building inspections department coordinates the program and aids in ensuring compliance.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-37

II
h. Southport Revitalization Plan
In 1979, the Brunswick County Planning Department prepared a plan for revitalizing
Southport's downtown and waterfront park areas. The plan emphasized the need to capitalize
on the waterfront as the key to downtown revitalization.
ai. . City of Southport Waterfront Access Plan, 1989
0 The City of Southport prepared a 1989 Shoreline Access Plan to focus on protecting
environmentally -sensitive areas, while providing shoreline access sites which will support both
0 (� tourism and local recreational activities. The plan considers both the number of sites required
and their location/ease of access by the public. Priorities for the types of sites (not specific
0 sites) to be acquired are recommended.
Y P ]•
City of Southport 1986 1990> and 1997 CAMA Land Use Plans
The City of Southport prepared CAMA-funded Land Use Plans in 1986, 1990, and 1997.
Those plans responded to state planning guidelines and provided policy statements for use of
Areas of Environmental Concern.
k. Brunswick County Thoroughfare Plan
In 1990 the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)prepared a Brunswick
O County Thoroughfare Plan. The maps providing the general locations for future thoroughfares
are provided in the Transportation section of this plan.
(� 1. City of Southport Thoroughfare Plan
�J In July, 2000, the City of Southport adopted its own thoroughfare plan. The plan
identifies existing and anticipated future deficiencies in the transportation system and
uncovers the need for new facilities.
M. City of Southport Sign Ordinance
(� The City of Southport prepared a Sign Ordinance which provides regulations for the
erection, construction, and maintenance of all signs within the jurisdictional area.
0 n. Traffic Operations and Pedestrian Safety Study
a In January 1997, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) through the
Municipal Traffic Engineering Assistance Program (MTEAP) completed a Traffic Operations and
Pedestrian Safety Study for the City of Southport. This study presents findings and provides
recommendations for improving traffic operations and enhancing pedestrian and motorist safety.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-38

The MTEAP provides traffic engineering assistance, through the performance of comprehensive
transportation studies, to North Carolina schools, state agencies, and municipalities that have
a population of 50,000 or less and do not have a traffic engineer on staff.
o. Impact Fee Ordinance
In 1984, the city established an impact fee ordinance to allocate the cost of providing
sewage treatment services on a user -oriented basis. State daily flow estimates are utilized as
the basis for establishing costs.
G. STIMULANTS TO DEVELOPMENT
The City of Southport has many different stimulants for development which make the city a very
desirable place for living and working. The most significant contributors to the popularity of
Southport are the city's geographic location on the Intracoastal Waterway and Cape Fear River,
tree lined streets, historic downtown, and small town atmosphere. Southport is hot and humid
in summer, but is frequently cooled by sea breezes. Winters are cool with occasional, brief cold
spells. Snowfall is rare. The average seasonal snowfall is less than one inch. In addition to the
good climate, the city offers adequate retail services, quality health care, numerous recreational
opportunities, and public water and sewer services. Many of the stimulants mentioned above are
discussed in greater detail elsewhere in this plan.
The following provides a summary of stimulants to development:
-- Small town atmosphere
-- Public water and sewer
-- Waterfront
-- Recreational opportunities
-- Retail services
-- Provision of quality health care services
-- Climate
-- Historic district
-- Numerous live oaks and long leaf pine trees
-- Quality public school system and accessibility to higher learning
H. DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINTS: LAND SUITABILITY
1. Topography/Geology
Brunswick County is in the lower Coastal Plain and ranges in elevation from 75 feet to sea level.
All of the soils in the county formed in Coastal Plan sediment or in sediment deposited by streams
flowing through the county. Most of the county is nearly level with short slopes along the main
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-39 0

Ddrainageways. The main streams are wide and shallow, and those near the ocean are affected
by tides. A short distance inland, the streams become narrow with broad interstream areas.
DThe majority of Southport's planning jurisdiction is flat with mostvariations in elevation occurring
adjacent to streams and creeks. In most areas, elevations range from 16 to 24 feet above mean
Dsea level. The land areas gradually slope to sea level elevations along Dutchman's Creek,
Bonnetts Creek, Prices Creek, Cottage Creek, the Intracoastal Waterway, and the Cape Fear
DRiver. Topography is not considered to be a serious constraint to development in Southport.
Southport is situated in a geologically complex area. A post-miocene aquifer exists between the
D land surface and a depth of 40 feet below surface. The aquifer consists of sand and contains
potable water. Below the post-miocene is the tertiary system aquifer. This aquifer is the
primary source of Southport's water supply. The aquifer contains porous and permeable
Dlimestone, providing conditions in which excellent quality groundwater is stored under artesian
conditions. Rainfall in the Southport area aids in aquifer recharge.
DGroundwater from the surficial3 deposits is of good quality but may have a high iron content. The
surficial deposits are a valuable aquifer and furnish water for many rural residences. Generally,
Dthis aquifer is 10 to 30 feet thick and 40 feet thick in some places south of U.S. Highway 17.
Below the surficial deposits is a limestone aquifer. It consists of phosphatic limestone with layers
Dof sand, silt, and sandy marl. The limestone aquifer is an important source of water. It is
underlain by sedimentary deposits that contain brackish water.
D2. Flood Hazard Areas
(� The City of Southport has a Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). The city's Building Inspector
u enforces the Flood Insurance Ordinance. The map designates "A", "AE", and "V' flood zones.
"A' flood zones are areas that will experience rising flood waters with little or no wave action.
DThe "A" zone is specifically defined as Special Flood Hazard Areas inundated by the 100-year
flood, determined by approximate methods; no base flood elevations are shown or flood hazard
D factors determined. The "AE" zone is specifically defined as Special Flood Hazard Areas
inundated by the 100-year flood, determined by detailed methods; base flood elevations
shown at selected intervals. The "V' flood zone indicates areas inundated by the 100-year flood
Dthat have additional velocity hazards associated with waves of 3-foot amplitude or greater.
Approximately 25 percent of the city's planning jurisdiction is within the "A" and "AE" zones
Dcombined and approximately 15 percent within the N" zone. Map 4 delineates the "A", "AE",
and N" zones.
D
D3Surficial: Water at a level just below the grounds surface.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-40
D

44�ffi/!4,4 140
f IM,
e4; Oil 4
"now—
qig4;Z
'rum C6
Intracoastal Waterway

0 Detailed locations of the individual zones may be determined by referring to the detailed
floodway flood boundary and floodway maps prepared as a part of the 1985 flood insurance
study. Copies of the maps are maintained on file in the Southport Building Inspector's office.
Generally, the following zone locations exist:
Bonnetts Creek Tributary (upper creek) Al
Bonnetts Creek A3
a Intracoastal Waterway V13 and A10
Cape Fear River V12 and A10
Cottage Creek, Prices Creek, and Dutchman's Creek are all located within the 100-year flood
boundary. It is estimated that less than 5% of Southport's population resides in Flood Zone V, and
approximately 15% resides within Flood Zone A and AE.
The greatest storm sure impact will occur from hurricanes. Maps 5A and 5B show the general
g g P P
Dareas of Southport which may be affected by hurricane -generated storm surge.
While a considerable amount of Southport lies within the floodplain, the greatest threat is
flooding resulting from storm surge and local ponding of water. Approximately 40 to 50 percent
of the city's planning jurisdiction could be inundated during a Category One hurricane. However,
flooding would not appear to be significantly worse in a Category Two through Five hurricane.
O The Saffir-Sim son Hurricane Scale is a rating system based on hurricane intensity. Within each
P g Y Y
category is a description of wind speed, storm surge, and estimated damages. Examples of each
category are noted.
a Category One Hurricane: Winds 74-95 mph. Storm surge generally 4-5 feet above normal.
No significant damage to permanent structures. Damage limited to unanchored mobile
homes, shrubbery, and trees. Some damage to poorly constructed areas. Limited coastal
D road flooding and minor pier damage may occur. Hurricanes Allison and Noel of 1995 were
Category One hurricanes at peak intensity.
I
I
Category Two Hurricane: Winds 96-110 mph. Storm surge generally 6-8 feet above
normal. Some roofing material, door, and window damage to buildings. Considerable
damage to shrubbery and trees. Some trees blown down. Considerable damage to mobile
homes, poorly constructed signs, and piers. Coastal and low-lying escape routes flood 2-4
hours before the arrival of the hurricane center. Small craft in unprotected anchorages
break moorings. Hurricane Bertha of 1996 was a Category Two hurricane when it hit the
North Carolina coast.
It
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-42

f
W
ob
1r
L7

I
I
0
I
Category Three Hurricane: Winds 111-130 mph. Storm surge generally 9-12 feet above
normal. Some structural damage to small residences and utility buildings with a minor
amount of curtainwall failures. Foliage blown off trees. Large trees blown down. Mobile
homes and poorly constructed signs are destroyed. Low-lying escape routes are covered
by rising water 3-5 hours before the arrival of the hurricane center. Flooding near the
coast destroys smaller structures with larger structures damaged by floating debris.
Terrain lower than 5 feet above mean sea level may be flooded 8 miles inland. Evacuation
of low-lying residences within several blocks of the shoreline may be required. Hurricane
Fran of 1996 was a Category Three hurricane.
Category Four Hurricane: Winds 131-155 mph. Storm surge generally 13-18 feet above
O normal. More extensive curtainwall failures with some complete roof structure failures on
small residences. Shrubs, trees, and all signs are blown down. Complete destruction of
mobile homes. Extensive damage to doors and windows. Low-lying escape routes may be
covered by rising water 3-5 hours before the arrival of the hurricane center. Major damage
to the lower floors of structures near the shore. Terrain lower than 10 feet above sea level
may be flooded, requiring the massive evacuation of residential areas as far inland as 6
miles. Hurricanes Opal and Hugo were Category Four hurricanes at peak intensity when
they struck the Florida and South Carolina coasts, respectively. Both storms eventually
passed over the western part of North Carolina. At this time, wind speeds had dropped to
tropical storm force winds.
Category Five Hurricane: Winds greater than 155 mph. Storm surge generally greater
than 18 feet. Complete roof failure on many residences and industrial buildings. Some
complete building failures with small utility buildings blown away. All shrubs, trees, and
signs blown down. Complete destruction of mobile homes. Severe and extensive window
and door damage. Low-lying escape routes are cut by rising water 3-5 hours before the
arrival of the hurricane center. Major damage to lower floors of all structures located less
than 15 feet above sea level and within 500 yards of the shoreline. Massive evacuation of
residential areas on low ground within 5-10 miles of the shoreline may be required.
Hurricane Gilbert of 1988 was a Category Five hurricane at peak intensity and is the
strongest Atlantic tropical cyclone of record. Gilbert passed over Jamaica, the Yucatan
Peninsula, and Northern Mexico.
A long-range flooding problem may result from anticipated sea level rise. During the past
century, the sea has risen approximately one foot. Generally, experts expect the sea level rise
to accelerate over the next century and rise an additional four to seven feet. If this anticipated
a increase in sea level occurs, the impact on Southport will be substantial. The areas shown on
Map 4 as flood hazard areas would be almost totally inundated by a seven foot sea level rise.
This will result in the loss of approximately 20 to 25 percent. of Southport's current planning
jurisdiction area. All salt marsh areas would be lost. The whole issue of sea level rise has serious
implications for Southport, and the long term rate of rise must be carefully monitored.
aThe city also suffers from intermittent flooding from rainfall and storm water runoff. The soil
associations shown on Map 6 provide an indication of the locations of high water table areas. The
water table depths, flooding frequency, and permeability rates are provided in Table 21.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-45
0

Table 21
City of Southport
Soil Susceptibility to Flooding
High Water Table
Map
Symbol
Soil Types
Depth
Kind
Months
BnB
Blanton fine sand
5.0-6.0
Perched
Dec -Mar
BO
Bohicket silty clay loam
+3-0
Apparent
Jan -Dec
CA
Carteret loamy fine sand
+3-1.0
Apparent
Jan -Dec
DO
Dorovan muck
+1-0.5
Apparent
Jan -Dec
KrB
Kureb fine sand
>6.0
---
---
LA
Laffite muck
0-0.5
Apparent
Jan -Dec
Lo
Leon fine sand
0-1.0
Apparent
Jun -Feb
Ly
Lynchburg fine sandy loam
0.5-1.5
Apparent
Nov -Apr
Ma
Mandarin fine sand
1.5-3.5
Apparent
Jun -Dec
Mu
Murville mucky fine sand
0-1.0
Apparent
Nov -May
NhE
Newhan fine sand, dredged
>6.0
---
---
PaA
Pactolus fine sand
1.5-3.0
Apparent
Dec -Apr
Ra
Rains fine sandy loam
0-1.0
Apparent
Nov -Apr
Tm
Tomahawk loamy fine sand
1.5-3.0
Apparent
Dec -Apr
To
Torhunta mucky fine sandy loam
0.5-1.5
Apparent
Dec -May
WaB
Wando fine sand
4.0-6.0
Apparent
Jan -Mar
WdB
Wando-Urban land complex
4.0-6.0
Apparent
Jan -Mar
YaB
Yaupon silty clay loam
2.0-4.0
Apparent
Jan -Dec
Flooding
Frequency
Duration
Months
None
---
---
Frequent
Very brief
Jan -Dec
Frequent
Very brief
Jan -Dec
Frequent
Verylong
Jan -Dec
None
---
Frequent
Brief
Jan -Dec
None
---
---
None
---
---
None
---
---
None
---
---
None
---
---
None
---
---
None
---
None
---
None
---
---
None
---
---
None
---
---
None
---
---
Source: Soil Survey of Brunswick County, North Carolina, United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-46

0 3. Soils
A detailed soils survey of Brunswick County has been completed by the Soil Conservation Service.
Based on that survey, there are 18 different soil associations located within the city's planning
jurisdiction. These associations are delineated on Map 6 and their conditions for site
development are provided in Table 22. Many of the soils located within Southport's planning
jurisdiction have some limitations for development.
Table 22
City of Southport
Soil Associations - Degree and Kind of Limitation for Stated Use
Map
Dwellings without
Septic Tank
Symbol
Soil Types
Basements
Streets li Roads
Absorption Fields
BnB
Blanton fine sand
Slight
Slight
Moderate: wetness
BO
Bohicket silty clay
Severe: flooding, ponding,
Severe: low strength,
Severe: flooding,
loam
shrink -swell
ponding, flooding
ponding, peres slowly
CA
Carteret loamy
Severe: flooding, ponding
Severe: ponding, flooding
Severe: flooding,
fine sand
ponding, poor filter
DO
Dorovan muck
Severe: flooding, ponding,
Severe: ponding, flooding,
Severe: flooding,
low strength
low strength
ponding, poor filter
KrB
Kureb fine sand
Slight
Slight
Severe: poor filter
LA
Laffite muck
Severe: flooding, low
Severe: flooding, low
Severe: flooding
strength
strength
Lo
Leon fine sand
Severe: wetness
Severe: wetness
Severe: wetness, poor
filter
Ly
Lynchburg fine
Severe: wetness
Severe: wetness
Severe: wetness, poor
sandy loam
filter
Ma
Mandarin fine
Moderate: wetness
Moderate: wetness
Severe: wetness
sand
Mu
Murville mucky
Severe: ponding
Severe: ponding
Severe: ponding, poor
fine sand
filter
NhE
Newhan fine sand,
Severe: slope
Severe: slope
Severe: poor filter,
dredged
slope
PaA
Pactolus fine sand
Moderate: wetness
Moderate: wetness
Severe: wetness, poor
filter
Ra
Rains fine sandy
Severe: wetness
Severe: wetness
Severe: wetness
loam
Tm
Tomahawk loamy
Moderate: wetness
Moderate: wetness
Severe: wetness
fine sand
To
Torhunta mucky
Severe: wetness
Severe: wetness
Severe: wetness, poor
fine sandy loam
filter
WaB
Wando fine sand
Slight
Slight
Severe: poor filter
WdB
Wando-Urban land
Slight
Slight
Severe: poor filter
complex
YaB
Yaupon silty clay
Severe: wetness
Severe: low strength,
Severe: peres slowly,
loam
shrink -swell
wetness
Note: Prime farmland soils located in Brunswick County include: Foreston loamy fine sand (Fo), Goldsboro fine sandy
loam (GoA), Johns fine sandy loam (Jo), Norfolk loamy fine sand (NoB), and Onslow fine sandy loam (On). None of
these prime farmland soil types are located within Southport's planning jurisdiction.
Source: Soil Survey of Brunswick County, North Carolina, United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation
Service.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan
1-47

MAP 6
City of Southport
Soils Map
Soils
BO
BaB
BnB
BrB
CA
cr
Co
DO
Du
Fo
GoA
Gt
KrB
LA
Lo
LY
Ma
Mk
Mu
NeE
NhE
NoB
On
PaA
Pt
Ra
Tm
To
WaB
WdB
Wo
YaB
w
Corporate Boundary
1 �
ETJ
/ \
1 Mile outside of ETJ
PAGE 1-48

I
I
I
I
0
4. Manmade Hazards/Restrictions
There are no significant manmade hazards within Southport's planning jurisdiction. The greatest
concentrations of hazardous materials are the storage of gasoline and fuel oil. in addition to fuel
storage, chemicals and pesticides are stored at a limited number of areas in and near Southport.
The EPA requires that facilities report certain chemical substances located on site. Specifically,
under this regulatory requirement, facilities with chemicals on the EPA's list of Extremely
Hazardous Substances present in a quantity equal to or in excess of their established Threshold
Planning Quantity or a 500 pound threshold (whichever number is less), as well as any hazardous
chemical present on site in a quantity equal to or greater than 10,000 pounds must be included
on an annual report called the Tier II. This report must be submitted by March 111 of each year
to the North Carolina Emergency Response Commission, the Local Emergency Planning
Committee, and the local fire department with jurisdiction over the reporting facility. Table 23
provides a list of facilities in the Southport area that submitted Tier II reports in 1999.
Table 23
Southport Area Tier II Reporters, 1999
O Facility Name Address
Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Highway 87, 2 %z miles North
Southport, NC 28461
I
I
I
I
LI
I
Cogentrix of NC, Inc.
Dixie LP Gas Co.
GOGAS #8
Handee Hugo #7
Military Ocean Terminal
Southport DMS 10, Bell South
Telecommunications
Valley Welding Supply Co.
Cogentrix Drive SE
Southport, NC 28461
511 N. Howe Street
Southport, NC 28461
1603 Howe Street SE
Southport, NC 28461
5043 Southport Supply Road
Southport, NC 28461
Sunny Point
Southport, NC 28461
254 East 11 th Street
Southport, NC 28461
8147 River Road SE
Southport, NC 28461
Source: Division of Emergency Management, 1999.
In addition, minor fuel storage facilities are known to exist at the following locations:
-- Bulk fuel oil and gas storage, 200 block of Leonard Street.
-- Fuel storage at the State Port Authority.
-- Fuel storage at the Indigo Plantation Marina.
0
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-49

As a result of federal regulations/Chapter 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 280 and
281) concerning underground storage tanks, the threat of explosion or groundwater
contamination from existing underground storage tanks should decrease.
Two major manmade hazard concerns exist outside of the city's planning jurisdiction which could
have a major impact on the city. The CPEtL Brunswick Nuclear Power Plant is located adjacent
to the northeast boundary of Southport's extraterritorial planning jurisdiction. Obviously, an
accident at the plant could have major impact on the city. Evacuation plans are in effect and
monitored by the Brunswick County Emergency Management Coordinator. (In addition, some of
C1381's property extends into the city's ETJ.)
The second potential hazard would be the possibility of contamination of the Cape Fear River
from the Port of Wilmington in the event of a large oil or chemical spill or from damage to a
tanker traveling by Southport to the Port of Wilmington. Also, explosives are occasionally
shipped on the Cape Fear River along the Southport shoreline to the Sunny Point Army Terminal.
None of Southport's planning jurisdiction is located in the Sunny Point Military Ocean Terminal
"blast zone" or along the railroad line servicing the terminal. In any case, damage to marine life
and the estuarine shoreline as well as Southport could be extensive. Shipping passes within
several hundred feet of both residential and commercial areas.
Although not presently a concern, there is the potential for the establishment of off -shore drilling
operations that could potentially present a hazard to Southport. Even though oil tankers which
pass by Southport to the Port of Wilmington probably present a greater threat to the city than
that of an off -shore drilling operation, the presence of such would still be a concern of Southport
if one were constructed. It should be noted that Southport does not encourage off -shore drilling
operations but will not oppose on -shore support facilities for which an environmental impact
statement has been prepared with a finding of no significant impact on the environment.
5. Fragile Areas
In coastal North Carolina, fragile areas are considered to include coastal wetlands, ocean hazard
areas, shorelines, estuarine waters and shorelines, sound and estuarine islands, public trust
waters, natural heritage areas, areas sustaining remnant species, unique geological formations,
registered natural landmarks, swamps, prime wildlife habitats, areas of excessive slope, areas
of excessive erosion, scenic points, archaeological sites, historical sites, and 404 wetlands.
Southport's planning jurisdiction includes estuarine waters and shorelines, coastal wetlands,
public trust waters, 404 wetlands, and historical sites.
a. Coastal Wetlands
The coastal wetlands are generally delineated on Map 7, Areas of Environmental Concern
and Other Fragile Areas. However, it is emphasized that the specific locations of coastal
wetlands can be determined only through on -site investigation and analysis. Coastal wetlands
11
11
I
I
I
I
n
I
I
I
11
11
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-50
0

are defined as salt marshes regularly- or irregularly -flooded by.tides including wind tides,
provided this shall not include hurricane or tropical storm tides. These areas must contain at
a least one, but not necessarily all of the following marsh plant species: Cordgrass, Meadow
Grass, and Salt Reed Grass. The coastal wetlands are vital to the complex food chain found in
estuaries. They provide marine nursery areas and are essential to a sound commercial fishing
aindustry. Coastal wetlands also serve as barriers against flood damage and control erosion
between the estuary and uplands. Substantial coastal wetland areas are located along
Dutchman, Prices, and Cottage Creeks.
b. Estuarine Waters
Estuarine waters are generally those waters found in estuaries, sounds, bays, salt water
shorelines, and the Atlantic Ocean within three miles of the shoreline. They are the dominant
acomponent and bonding element of the entire estuarine system, integrating aquatic influences
from both the land and the sea. The estuarine waters are among the most productive natural
environments within Southport's planning jurisdiction. The waters support the valuable
commercial and sports fisheries of the coastal area which are comprised of estuarine dependent
species such as menhaden, flounder, shrimp, crabs, and oysters.
GC. Estuarine Shorelines
Estuarine shorelines are those non -ocean shorelines that are especially vulnerable to
erosion, flooding, or other adverse effects of wind and water. They are intimately connected
to the estuary. In shoreline areas not contiguous to waters classified as outstanding resource
waters by the Environmental Management Commission, all land 75 feet landward from the normal
water level are considered to be estuarine shorelines. Development within the estuarine
a shorelines influences the quality of estuarine life and is subject to the damaging processes of
shorefront erosion and flooding.
Od. Public Trust Areas
a Public trust areas are all waters of the Atlantic Ocean and the lands thereunder from the
mean high water mark to the seaward limit of state jurisdiction; all natural bodies of water
subject to measurable lunar tides and lands thereunder to the mean high water mark; all
a navigable natural bodies of water and lands thereunder to the mean high water level or mean
water level as the case may be, except privately -owned lakes to which the public has no right
of access; all water in artificially created bodies of water containing significant public fishing
resources or other public resources which are accessible to the public by navigation from bodies
of water in which the public has rights of navigation; and all waters in artificially created bodies
O of water in which the public has acquired rights by prescription, custom, usage, dedication, or
any other means. In determining whether the public has acquired rights in artificially created
bodies of water, the following factors shall be considered:
a
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-51
i

(1) the use of the body of water by the public,
(2) the length of time the public has used the area,
(3) the value of public resources in the body of water,
(4) whether the public resources in the body of water are mobile to the extent that
they can move into natural bodies of water,
(5) whether the creation of the artificial body of water required permission from the
state, and
(6) the value of the body of water to the public for navigation from one public area
to another public area.
These areas are significant because the public has rights in these areas, including
navigation and recreation. The public trust areas also support valuable commercial and sports
fisheries, have aesthetic value, and are important resources for economic development.
The public trust areas must be determined through in -field analysis and definition.
e. ' Wetlands Defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
404 wetlands are areas covered by water or that have waterlogged soils for long periods
during the growing season. Plants growing in wetlands are capable of living in soils lacking
oxygen for at least part of the growing season. 404 wetlands include, but are not limited to,
bottomlands, forests, swamps, pocosins, pine savannahs, bogs, marshes, wet meadows, and
coastal wetlands.
Map 7 provides the approximate location of pocosin, bottomland hardwood/swamp
forest, and coastal wetlands located within the city's planning jurisdiction.
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act requires that anyone interested in depositing dredged
or fill material into "waters of the United States," including wetlands, must apply for and receive
a permit for such activities. The Wilmington office of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has
regulatory authority in Southport's planning jurisdiction. While there may be scattered wetland
areas (non -coastal wetlands) located within Southport, the specific locations of wetlands areas
must be determined through on -site analysis. It should be noted that in some Areas of
Environmental Concern, both the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers and the regulatory requirements
of the Coastal Area Management Act may have overlapping jurisdiction. Simultaneous to the
preparation of this plan, amendments to the federal definition of wetlands were being considered
Which could reduce the areas afforded protection under the wetlands legislation.
f. Slopes in Excess of 12%
Except for some shoreline areas located along the Cape Fear River, there are no slopes
in excess of 12% located within the city's planning jurisdiction. Excess slope has not been a
deterrent to development within Southport's planning jurisdiction.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-52

K! "'W
I
W. , -,
Will
1, -0
NZ-1
mmm.06-WhOlt-I
ttery
land
m

0 g. Excessive Erosion Areas
a Excessive erosion of shoreline areas has not been a problem within Southport's planning
jurisdiction.
I
I
I
I
I
h. Historic and Archaeological Sites
Southport includes many historically significant sites. In fact, one of the city's most
important community assets is its historic resources. The city has a National Register Historic
District which generally extends from the Cape Fear River from Kingsley Street to the Yacht Basin
north to West Street. Map 8 provides a general indication of the city's historic district
boundaries. The National Register of Historic Places lists the following four categories of
rankings for buildings in a Historic District:
Pivotal - Building or properties that are individually outstanding, historically, and/or
architecturally, and stand as a visual landmark in the community.
Contributing - Buildings whose architectural or historical significance is important to the
O total character and history of Southport. These late 19th and early 20th century buildings
define the planning, scale, and architectural unity of the town.
Non-contributing - Although these buildings, such as contemporary dwellings, may fit
unobtrusively into the scale and planning of the earlier fabric of the town, they are not
awhat gives it its historic character.
Intrusive - Building totally out of scale or with unsympathetic materials which disrupt the
Omaterials and aesthetic qualities of the townscape.
Buildings or structures within the Historic District which have been identified as "pivotal"
include:
St. Philips Episcopal Church (Moore Street)
T.M. Thompson House (Bay Street)
River Pilots Tower and Building (Bay Street)
a
Walker -Pike House (Bay Street)
Fort Johnston Hospital (Bay Street)
Masonic Lodge (Nash Street)
Trinity Methodist Church (Nash Street)
A.E. Stevens House (Atlantic Avenue)
Old Brunswick County Courthouse (Moore Street
O
Old Brunswick Inn (Arrington House) (Atlantic Avenue and Bay Street)
Adkins-Ruark House (corner Nash and Lord Streets)
Fort Johnston Officers Quarters (Bay Street)
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan
I
1-54

I
MAP 8
0
I
I
N
W E
s
400 0 400 Feet
The preparation of this document was financed in part through a
grant provided by the North Carolina Coastal Management
Program, through funds provided by the Coastal Zone Management
Act of 1972, as amended, which is administered by the Office
of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.
City of Southport
Historic District
Legend
Historic District
PAGE 1-55

aFort Johnston, the Old Brunswick County Courthouse (now housing City Hall), and the
Quarantine Office are also listed separately in the National Register. In addition to the
a historically significant structures, the waterfront area contains many uncatalogued historic and
possible archaeologically significant sites.
Qi. Natural Heritage Areas
O The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program maintains the state's list of significant
"Natural Heritage Areas" as required by the Nature Preserves Act (NCGS Chapter 113A-164 of
Article 9A). The list is based on the program's inventory of the natural diversity in the state.
Natural areas (sites) are evaluated on the basis of the occurrences of rare plant and animal
species, rare or high quality natural communities, and geologic features. The global and
statewide rarity of these elements and the quality of their occurrence at a site relative to other
Ooccurrences determine a site's significance rating.
Q The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program has identified 1,678 significant natural
heritage areas within North Carolina of which three are located within the City of Southport. The
locations of these sites are provided on Map 9. The sites included in this list are the best known
O representatives of the natural diversity of the city and therefore have priority for protection.
Inclusion on this list does not mean that public access exists or is appropriate. Permission of the
landowner is recommended in all cases. Inclusion on this list does not confer protection to a site,
nor does it give it regulatory status. The list includes both protected and unprotected areas.
This list of sites and their significance ratings are based on the best available information as
0 derived from the Natural Heritage Program staff and databases. More information on these
natural areas may be obtained from the Natural Heritage Program.
j. Other Fragile Areas
There are no inlet hazard areas, sound and estuarine islands, complex natural areas,
coastal geologic formations, maritime forests, or other fragile areas, as defined by 15A NCAC 7H
located in Southport's planning jurisdiction.
6. Areas of Resource Potential
aa. Regionally Significant Public Parks
The City of Southport contains a number of recreational facilities. They are identified
in the Development Constraints: Public Facilities section of this plan. There are no public parks
located within the city's planning jurisdiction which have regional significance.
1
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-56

0 MAP 9
0 City of Southport
Significant Heritage Areas
N
W E
s
2000 0 2000 Feet
I
0 The preparation of this document was financed in part through a
grant provided by the North Carolina Coastal Management
Program, through funds provided by the Coastal Zone Management
Act of 1972, as amended, which is administered by the Office
0 of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.
Legend
Significant Natural Heritage Area Site Codes
OS.USNCHP'421
O S.USNCHP'674
• S.USSER01'205
Corporate Boundary
ETJ
PAGE 1-57

I
0 b. Marine Resources
Q The North Carolina Division of Water Quality assigns water quality classifications to all
waters of the State of North Carolina. The schedule of classifications is provided by 15 NCAC
26.0302 to .0317. The classifications are based upon the existing or contemplated best usage
0 of the various streams and segments of streams within a basin, as determined through studies,
evaluations, and comments received at public hearings. The state classifies tidal salt waters as
follows:
Class SA: shellfishin for market purposes and an other usage specified d g p p y g pec a by
the "SB" and "SC" classification;
Class SB: primary recreation and any other usage specified by the "SC"
aclassification;
Class SC: fish and wildlife propagation, secondary recreation, and other uses
Drequiring waters of lower quality.
All waters within Southport's planning jurisdiction are classified as either SC or SA waters.
OThe general locations of the water classifications are delineated on Map 7, Areas of
Environmental Concern and Fragile Areas. SC waters are salt waters protected for secondary
O recreation, aquatic life propagation, and survival. SA waters are primarily reserved for
shellfishing plus all uses allowed in SC and SB classified waters.
a A primary nursery area is located in Dutchman Creek. The specific location is defined as
follows:
allorth of a line beginning at a point on the east shore 33°55'07" North - 78°02'39"
West, running 294° (M) to a point on the West Shore 33°55'08" North - 78°02'44"
West.
D
Primary nursery areas.are those areas of the estuarine system where initial post -larval
development takes place. These areas are usually located in the uppermost sections of an
estuarine system where populations are uniformly very early juveniles.
In addition, surface waters (streams, lakes, or estuaries) are rated as either fully
supporting (S), support -threatened (ST), partially supporting (PS), or nonsupporting (NS) by the
Division of Water Quality. The terms refer to whether the classified uses of the water (such as
Owater supply, aquatic life protection and swimming) are being fully supported, partially
supported, or are not supported. For instance, saltwaters classified for commercial shellfish
a harvesting (SA) would be rated as fully supporting if bacterial levels in the water were low
enough to allow harvesting. However, if fecal coliform bacteria levels were too high to allow
shellfish to be harvested, but not too high to prevent swimming, then the waters would be rated
Qas partially supporting since they only support the swimming. If the waters were impacted to the
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-58
0

point that even swimming was disallowed, the waters would be rated as nonsupporting. All of
the waters adjacent to Southport have been identified as partially supporting (PS).
All of Southport's planning jurisdiction is located within the Cape Fear River Basin within
sub -basin area 03030005070010. The city occupies 1.5% of the Cape Fear Basin's land area.
C. Agricultural and Forestlands
There are no significant agriculturally productive areas or commercially productive
forestlands located within Southport's planning jurisdiction.
I. URBAN FORM
1. Components of Urban Form
Generally, there are five design components which all interrelate to give a city its urban form.
These five components include: districts, paths, nodes, landmarks, and edges. These five design
elements, together with the variety of land uses and economic influences, give a city its
structure, character, appearance, and uniqueness. It is important that a municipality understand
the elements that comprise its urban form so that its development policies can be drafted to
preserve, nurture, and capitalize upon the municipality's strengths. Following are discussions
of each component.
a. Districts
Districts have distinct identities that are created by their location, type of buildings, and
purpose. A person with familiarity of a given community is aware of the varying areas which
possess distinct characteristics and refers to those districts with specific areas in mind. Examples
of common districts which can be found in almost every city include industrial districts,
residential neighborhoods, commercial strips, a central business district (CBD), and commons.
Within the City of Southport there are several varying districts. These districts include,
but may not necessarily be limited to, the following:
► Central Business District
► Historic District*
► Howe Street Commercial Strip
► Industrial District
► Waterfront
► Numerous Residential Districts'(i.e., Smithfield Woods, Indigo Plantation, Harbor
Oaks, Forest Oaks, and River Landing)
*A portion of the city's historic district may also be considered a residential
district.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-59 0

0
I
G
I
I
i
I
i
I
b. Paths
A path provides movement between districts or within a district and may also serve as an
entrance or exit to and from the community. Paths form the framework of the city; they give
it organization and shape. People observe the landscape while passing through it on paths and
paths determine the flow of activity within the city and between the city and neighboring areas.
Paths may be grouped into two broad categories: transportation paths and natural paths.
1) Transportation Paths
Transportation paths or corridors contain the railway or in most cases roadways,
street trees, utility lines, sidewalks, street lights, etc. Roadway transportation
paths may be further classified into the following three types:
► "Local Access Streets" provide access to abutting property. They are not
intended to carry heavy volumes of traffic.and should be located such that
only traffic with origins or destinations on the streets would be served.
THEIR FUNCTION IS TO PROVIDEACCESS. Depending upon the type of land
use which they serve, local access streets may further be classified as
residential, commercial, and/or industrial.
► "Minor Thoroughfares" are more important streets in the city system.
They collect traffic from local access streets and carry it to the major
thoroughfare system. They may, in some instances, supplement the major
thoroughfare system by aiding minor through movements. A third function
which may be performed is that of providing access to abutting property.
They should be designed to serve limited areas so that their development
as major thoroughfares will be prevented.
► "Major Thoroughfares" are the primary traffic arteries of the city. Their
function is to move intra-city and inter -city traffic. Although undesirable,
the streets which comprise the major thoroughfare system may also serve
abutting property; however, THEIR MAJOR FUNCTION IS TO CARRY
TRAFFIC. They should not be bordered by strip development because such
development significantly lowers the capacity of the thoroughfare, and
each driveway is a danger to traffic flow. Major thoroughfares may range
from two lane streets to expressways with six or more traffic lanes. As a
general rule, parking should not be permitted on major thoroughfares.
Cit0 y of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-60

2) Natural Paths
In coastal plain areas, the only significant natural corridors are formed by major
water courses and associated tributaries. These types of natural corridors serve
as drainage ways, transportation routes, wildlife habitat areas, provide open
space and opportunities for greenway development.
3) Southport Transportation and Natural Paths
Table 24 provides a summary of the various paths located within the City of
Southport planning jurisdiction.
Table 24
Summary of Paths
Southport Planning Jurisdiction
Transportation Paths
Major Thoroughfares: NC 87, NC 211, and NC 133.
Minor Thoroughfares: Howe Street, portions of Moore Street, Jabbertown Road,
and portions of West and Leonard Streets.
Local Access Streets: All remaining streets within Southport's planning jurisdiction
are considered local access.
Natural Paths
Intracoastal Waterway/Cape Fear River
Tributaries of the Intracoastal Waterway/Cape Fear River include, but are not
limited to: Dutchman's Creek, Prices Creek, Bonnetts Creek, and Cottage Creek.
C. Nodes
A node is a gathering place and in most cases an area of concentrated high intensity land
uses. Although nodes are usually located where two or more paths intersect, a node may also
be located at the core of a district. A city square as the center of the CBD is an example. A
public park or village green could also be considered a node. A node often serves as a symbol
of a district.
Within Southport's planning jurisdiction, existing nodes are located in the following areas:
► Intersection of Moore Street and Howe Street
► Intersection of NC 211 and NC 87
► West Bay Street at City Yacht Basin.
► W. West Street
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-61 0

I
7
I
I
7
I
I
0
I
0
d. Landmarks
A landmark is a prominent building or public site that is easy to find and provides a
reference point. It is common to find landmarks located within a node, such as a courthouse in
the middle of the city square. Other landmarks may be outside the city but are within view, such
as a hill, island, fire, or water tower.
There are numerous landmarks within Southport's planning jurisdiction. Some of the most
significant landmarks include the following:
► Old Yacht Basin
► Northwood Cemetery
► Old Smithville Burial Ground
► Ferry Landing
► Brunswick Community Building
► Fort Johnston
► Southport Elementary School
► Dosher Memorial Hospital
► Trinity United Methodist Church
► Masonic Lodge
e. Edges
► City Pier
► City Hall
► St. Phillip's Episcopal Church
► Old Brunswick Inn
► River Pilots Tower Et Building
► Southport Water Tower
► CPEtL Canal
► U.S. Post Office
► Franklin Park
Edges help divide a city into distinct areas. Some districts have well defined edges which
separate it from other areas of the city. Rivers and creeks provide clearly recognizable edges.
Arguably, the most significant edge in a small city is the transition between the urbanized core
of the city and the surrounding countryside. However, the sprawl of new development often
disseminates the edge between urbanized and rural areas.
Within Southport's planning jurisdiction, the most distinct edge is formed by the Cape
Fear River and Intracoastal Waterway which defines the city's southern boundary. Although the
edge between built-up and rural areas in Southport has been clouded by urban sprawl, a
a generalized edge is formed by the city's original corporate limit arch prior to the annexations
that have occurred.
The City of Southport districts, paths, nodes, landmarks, and edges together give the city
its unique urban form. These five design elements create districts which are organized by nodes,
a intersected with paths, set apart by edges, and dotted with landmarks. Map 10 provides an
illustration of the elements which comprise the City of Southport's urban form.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-62
� 11

N
Intracoastal
�_ Waterwa
ear
F
LaQe
The preparation of this document was financed in part through a
grant provided by the North Carolina Coastal Management
Program, through funds provided by the Coastal Zone Management
Act of 1972, as amended, which is administered by the Office
of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.
MAP 10
City of Southport
Urban Form Map
Legend
Corporate Boundary
A/
ETJ
Landmarks
Node
Paths
V
Major Thoroughfare
A
/ \ 1
Minor Thoroughfare
A//
Natural Path
Districts
Central Business District
ONumerous
Residential Districts
OHistoric
District
Industrial District
Waterfront Area
Howe Street Commercial Strip
N
E
S
2000 0 2000 Feet
PAGE 1-63

0
0 J. DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINTS: PUBLIC FACILITIES
a1. Water Supply
The City of Southport currently owns and operates a potable water system which includes water
a supply, storage and distribution facilities serving the residents and businesses within the City of
Southport. There are approximately 1,700 residential water customers. In addition to serving
the areas within the city limits, the distribution system extends outside the city limits north along
Highway 211 to the south side of the CPEtL canal. Some of the areas served along this stretch
include the Smithville Woods subdivision, Forest Oaks subdivision, and most of the businesses
along Highway 211 near its intersection with Highway 87. A 6-inch water main also extends from
the city limits along River Road to the North Carolina Department of Transportation ferry landing.
Map 11 illustrates the location of water lines in Southport.
aThe water supply facilities include two (2) operational groundwater wells drawing water from the
Castle Hayne Aquifer. Well No. 1, which is located within Franklin Park adjacent to the
Southport Baptist Church, is no longer in service. Well No. 2 is located on Leonard Street at the
intersection of Willis Street. Well No. 3 is located along 9th Street, northwest of the intersection
of 9th Street and Burrington Avenue. Well No. 2's pump was not operational at the end of August
2000, and had to be replaced. The pump at Well No. 3 was cleaned in September 2000, to
restore its original pumping capacity. The pumping rates for wells 2 and 3 are approximately 240
GPM and 250 GPM, respectively with a combined total yield of approximately 352,800 (12-hour
apumping limit) gallons per day. In addition to the groundwater supplies stated above, the city's
distribution system is connected with the Brunswick County System at the city limits along
D Leonard Street. A 12-inch main extends from a 24-inch county water main near the intersection
of Jabbertown Road and Leonard Street and is connected to a 6-inch city main through a 6-inch
meter assembly. This interconnect provides Southport with approximately 40% of its water. The
a Howe Street waterline has been relocated from under the Howe Street pavement to the side
of the street. The line was also increased from a 6 inch to a 12 inch line to improve water
flow and pressure. Treatment of groundwater supply has been limited to a combination of
chlorine and ammonia (chloramine) for disinfection and phosphate feed to control iron. The
distribution system includes an elevated storage tank with a capacity of 150,000 gallons. The
distribution main sizes include 2-inch, 4-inch, 6-inch, and 8-inch mains. Water system needs are
Udiscussed in Section II of this plan.
2. Sewer
a Southport maintains two different types of waste water treatment plants. An activated sludge
P YP P g
O sewage treatment plant with a design capacity of 300,000 gallons per day (gpd) and a biological
aeration filter (BAF) sewage treatment plant with a design capacity of 500,000 gpd combine for
a total capacity of 800,000 gpd. The sewer system has approximately 1,400 customers. The
a current flow in the system is approximately 483,500 gpd, 60% of the system's capacity.
Therefore, the sewer system currently has a surplus capacity of approximately 316,500 gpd.
However, the collection system and pumping stations are currently operating at capacity. Map
12 illustrates the location of sewer lines in Southport.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-64

MAP 11
0
u�
I
0
0
I
u
a,
N
E
S
2000 0 2000 Feet
The preparation of this document was financed in part through a
grant provided by the North Carolina Coastal Management
Program, through funds provided by the Coastal Zone Management
Act of 1972, as amended, which is administered by the Office
of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.
City of Southport
Existing Water Lines
Water Lines
Corporate Boundary
EfJ
PAGE 1-65

I
M
C
II
0
hi
11
R
0
o,
2000 0 2000 Feet
The preparation of this document was financed in part through a
grant provided by the North Carolina Coastal Management
Program, through funds provided by the Coastal Zone Management
Act of 1972, as amended, which is administered by the Office
of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.
MAP 12
City of Southport
Existing Sewer Lines
le
Sewer Lines
�. Corporate Boundary
ED
PAGE 1-66

I
I
0
I
I
'.I
I
I
I
a
In July 2000, the City of Southport Board of Aldermen imposed a sewer moratorium on the
consideration and approval of any development projects containing 30 or more lots.
Southport's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit will be renewed in
June 2001. This permit is required by the State of North Carolina to operate a sewage treatment
plant and must be updated every five years. According to the state, prior to the issuance of
Southport's 2006 NPDES permit, plans must be in place to relocate the city's discharge site.
At the present time there are no private package treatment plants in use within the City of
Southport. The city opposes the construction of private package treatment plants within its
corporate area and as a result, none are expected to be constructed during the planning period.
All public facilities future needs, including those for the sewer system, are discussed in Section
II of this plan.
3. Solid Waste Disposal
The City of Southport has contracted with Waste Industries to pick up household garbage, yard
waste, and recyclables. The following schedule applies:
Household garbage: East of Howe Street on Tuesday; West of Howe Street on Monday.
Yard waste: City-wide on Wednesday.
Curbside recycling: Bi-weekly on household garbage day.
White goods (appliances) and brown goods (furniture) are picked up by Waste Industries on a call -
in basis.
Commercial collection of solid waste is also provided by Waste Industries on a case -by -case basis.
Dumpster sizes available include 2, 4, 6, and 8 cubic yards. Service is provided weekly.
Brunswick County has a Construction Et Demolition (CEtD) Landfill and a solid waste transfer
station. By law, construction and demolition material can be buried in the Brunswick County CEtD
Landfill, but all other solid waste must be deposited into a "sanitary landfill." At present,
Brunswick County does not have a "sanitary landfill," so solid waste is collected and then
transported to a facility in Sampson County. Before that solid waste is exported, materials that
can be recycled (such as white goods and tires) are removed. A "tipping fee" is charged to
dispose of items at the CEtD Landfill or the solid waste transfer station.
Brunswick County also operates convenience sites for residential waste only. The following
provides the location and operating hours of the Brunswick County CEtD Landfill/Transfer Station
and convenient sites.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-67

Brunswick County CEkD Landfill/Transfer Station
172 Landfill Road NE (off Galloway Road)
Bolivia, North Carolina
Facility Hours: Monday through Saturday 8:00 am to 4:00 p.m.
Highway 904 Convenient Site
736 Seaside Road SW
Calabash, North Carolina
Leland Convenient Site
9921 Chapell Loop Road SE
Leland, North Carolina
Oxpen Road Convenient Site
1709 Oxpen Road SW
Supply, North Carolina
Southport Convenient Site
8392 River Road SE
Southport, North Carolina
Convenient Sites Hours: Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and Saturday 8:00 am to 6:00 p.m.
4. Schools
The City of Southport is served by the Brunswick County School System. The only public school
facility located in Southport is the Southport Elementary School which serves grades K-5. The
school is located at 701 West 9`' Street. The facility had a 1999/2000 school year enrollment of
approximately 675 students. Most of the students were Southport residents. The middle school
students, grades 6-8, are served by the South Brunswick Middle School located near Boiling Spring
Lakes. The 1999/2000 school year enrollment was approximately 775 students. The high school
age students, grades 9-12, are served by the South Brunswick High School, also located in Boiling
Spring Lakes. The approximate 1999/2000 school year enrollment was 940 students. Southport
Elementary, South Brunswick Middle School, and South Brunswick High School enrollments include
students from Southport, Oak Island, Bolivia, and Boiling Spring Lakes.
The Brunswick County Community College operates an annex facility in Southport. The campus
is located in the Old Southport Middle School facility. The community college does not operate
any laboratory classes in Southport. The college offers a variety of continuing education classes
including: Art, Southport -Brunswick County History, Computer, Basic Law Enforcement,
Calligraphy, and Sign Language Classes.
11
I
I
I
I
11
0
r
I
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-68

I
I
I
I
I
0
There is a small private school affiliated with the First Apostolic Church on W. West Street,
offering instruction for Kindergarten through 12th grades. Additionally, a preschool is operated
by the Southport Baptist Church.
5. Transportation
As growth has occurred within Southport and its planning jurisdiction, traffic congestion has
increased. This problem was emphasized in the 1997 Land Use Plan. The congestion problems
which existed at that time remain essentially the same in 2001. The congestion problems are
concentrated on the city's major roads which include the following:
Principal Arterials: Principal arterials are those roads intended to provide travel routes for
through traffic and interconnect with minor arterials and major highway roads and systems.
NC 87; NC 211, and NC 133
a Minor Arterial: Minor arterials also serve through traffic, but carry smaller volumes of traffic
and serve to support the principal arterial system.
Howe Street; Portions of Moore Street; Jabbertown Road
Major Collectors: Major collectors are roads providing long travel routes and which connect
arterials and other collectors.
aPortions of West and Leonard Streets
Minor Collectors: Minor collectors are roads which provide for short and medium trips within
the city, generally moving traffic between neighborhoods.
Fodale Avenue, Lord Street, Bay Street
aThe most significant traffic congestion in Southport's planning jurisdiction occurs just south of
the NC 211 /NC 87 intersection. Approximately 18,000 vehicles travel through this location every
Oday. Map 13 provides the 1999 average daily traffic for Southport.
Several key land uses will significantly effect transportation planning during the planning period.
These include:
Fort Fisher -Southport Ferry
Bald Head Island Ferry
-- Central Business
-- NC 211/NC 87 intersection
-- Carolina Power and Light entrance
a
I
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-69
I

IN
0
0
0
0
0
2000
M
2000 Feet
The preparation of this document was financed in part through a
grant provided by the North Carolina Coastal Management
Program, through funds provided by the Coastal Zone Management
Act of 1972, as amended, which is administered by the Office
of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.
MAP 13
City of Southport
Average Daily
Traffic Count
850
4'
Average Daily Traffic
PAGE 1-70

II
I
I
0
I
0
0
I
0
I
I
0
In 1995, a Pavement Condition Survey was completed of the City of Southport. Each road
needing repair was assigned a code symbol defining the controlling maintenance activity for each
street section. The code symbols were as follows:
CID
= Crack Pouring
JR
= Joint Repair
SKP
= Skin Patching
FDP
= Full -Depth Patching
SO
= Short Overlay
PM1
= 1" Plant Mix Resurfacing
PM1ItS
= 1"Plant Mix and BST Seal
PM1.5
= 1.5" Plant Mix Resurfacing
PM2
= 2" Plant Mix Resurfacing
These maintenance activities can be categorized as either routine maintenance or resurfacing.
Routine maintenance limits the detrimental effects of traffic loads and weather conditions.
These activities include crack pouring, joint repair, patching, and short overlays. Resurfacing
adds a new layer to the pavement's structure and improves its load carrying capacity.
The following provides a definition of each maintenance activity.
► Crack Pouring: Block cracking is not a structural failure and does not usually progress
rapidly. Cracks are generally caused by shrinkage of the asphalt concrete and daily
temperature cycling. Traffic loads can increase the severity of block cracking if water
is allowed to penetrate into the cracks. Therefore, it is very important to seal these
cracks to prevent water penetration into the base materials. The definition of moderate
block/transverse cracking also includes cracks that have been sealed previously but are
beginning to open back up. Even though it will result in a higher initial cost, the use of
a rubberized asphalt crack sealant is recommended. Because cracks must be resealed
periodically, a continuing crack pouring program is required. Crack pouring can be a very
cost-effective expenditure of funds.
► Skin Patching: Skin patching is recommended for the repair of isolated locations of
moderate alligator cracking. It seats the surface and slows the rate of deterioration.
Alligator cracking is a structural failure of the pavement and can deteriorated rapidly if
proper maintenance is not performed.
► Full -Depth Patching: Full -depth patching is required to repair severe alligator cracking.
It involves the removal of the surface course, base course, and subgrade, if necessary.
New material should be placed in compacted lifts. Often a full -depth asphalt can be
used.
► Plant Mix Resurfacing: Plant mix resurfacing is a major maintenance activity. Combined
with full -depth patching, resurfacing is used to repair structural damage. it is
recommended for a variety of pavement distresses, as severity and magnitude increase,
and some distress types require more immediate attention than others. Because the
I
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan
1-71

I
funds available for street resurfacing normally are limited, resurfacing activities need to
be addressed by the type of pavement distress that causes the need.
Alligator Cracking: Alligator cracking is the most serious pavement distress. It is a
structural pavement failure that may be caused by traffic overload, inadequate design
thickness, base or subgrade failure, poor drainage, or a combination of these factors.
Since alligator cracking represents a structural failure, it will progress rapidly unless
properly repaired, perhaps to the point that the street may require complete pavement
reconstruction. Alligator cracking should be given top priority for repair. Severe cracking
is always corrected with full -depth patching. When light or no rutting exists with alligator
cracking, a 1" plant mix resurfacing is recommended. When moderate or severe rutting
exists with alligator cracking, a 2" plant mix resurfacing is recommended.
Block/Transverse Cracking: Block/transverse cracking is not load associated but is
caused by the shrinkage of asphalt concrete and temperature fluctuations. The severity
can increase if water penetrates into the cracks. Therefore, it is important to seal the
block/transverse cracks to prevent water penetration into the pavement's base materials.
Unless remedied, alligator cracking may develop. Resurfacing with a 1" plant mix would
be needed to repair moderate block/transverse cracking, although crack pouring is a cost-
effective alternative on Class A streets. Severe block/transverse cracking requires a seal
coat application followed by a 1" plant mix resurfacing. It is not practical to crack -pour
severe block cracking.
Map 14 provides the current (September 2000) road improvements needs for the City of
Southport. This map was produced using the results of the 1995 Pavement Condition Survey and
omitting the repairs that have been made since 1995. Thoroughfare planning is discussed in
Section II of this plan.
6. Police, Fire, and Emergency Medical
Southport provides fire and rescue services through volunteer departments. The response area
for the rescue squad extends from the Intracoastal Waterway in Southport along NC 133 to Orton
Plantation. To the west, the response area follows NC 211 to Midway Road (SR 1500); and covers
NC 133 between NC 211 and Oak Island. The fire department serves the majority of this area,
with the county providing service to a few houses along NC 133. Maximum response time within
the service area is 15 minutes. The city has a fire insurance classification rating of six.
The fire department has an average of 8 to 10 volunteers available during the day and 25 to 30
volunteers available at night. Backup support for the fire department is provided by the Sunny
Point Military Terminal Department and the Yaupon Beach Volunteer Fire Department. The rescue
squad has approximately 17 members and maintains a two member response crew as needed.
Both the fire and rescue departments are located on Nash Street across from the City Hall.
n
is
0
11
0
is
I
0
11
11
11
I
I
I
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-72
I

0
0
0
0
Q
W
w
MAP 14
City of Southport
Road Improvement Needs
s
500 0 500 Feet
The preparation of this document was financed in part through a
grant provided by the North Carolina Coastal Management
Program, through funds provided by the Coastal Zone Management
Act of 1972, as amended, which is administered by the Office
of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.
CP=Crack Pouring
SKP=Skin Patching
FDP=Full-Depth Patching
PM1=1" Plant Mix Resurfacing
PM1 FtS=1 Inch Plant Mix and BST Seal
PAGE 1-73

0
I
c
C
I
The fire department equipment includes the following:
1 - 4x4 brush truck
1 - ladder truck
1 - 750 gpm pumper truck
1 - 1,000 gpm pumper truck
1 - 1,250 gpm pumper truck
1 - water rescue two equipment truck
The rescue squad has ambulances, one crash truck, and one water rescue boat. It is anticipated
that as annexations occur and the city expands northward, additional fire and rescue services as
well as a more central location than Nash Street may be required.
The city's police department is staffed with 10 full-time and three part-time police officers. The
staff positions include: one school resource officer and one community resource officer.
Equipment includes seven patrol cars. All police officers are located on the first floor of the City
Qof Southport Municipal Building.
It
I
0
I
a
is
I
I
I
7. Recreation
The city maintains a number of active and passive recreation facilities. These are identified in
Table 25. The city's shoreline access facilities are further identified in Table 26.
Table 25
City of Southport
Recreation Facilities
Name
Location
Size
Facility
Activity
Art Gallery
West Street
--
Exhibit
Passive
Alvin C. Caviness Park
Owen Street
3/4 ac.
Active
Keziah Park
Moore Street
1 /4 ac.
Park benches
Passive
Waterfront Park
Bay Street
9 ac.
Park benches
Passive
Franklin Square Park
Howe Street
1 ac.
Gazebo and park benches
Passive
City Gym
Atlantic Avenue
--
1 basketball court
Active
City Pier
Bay Street
--
1 pier
Active
Stevens Park Little
Ninth Street
12 ac.
Baseball fields
Active
League Complex
Southport City Dock
Brunswick St.
--
30 boat slips
Active
Senior Citizens Center
Ninth Street
--
Club room
Active
Lowe White Park
Leonard Street
'/z ac.
2 tennis courts/picnic shelter
Active
J.C. Building
Fodale Street
-
Multi -purpose building
Active
Source: City of Southport.
0
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-74

0
Active recreational facilities are considered to be those which provide playing fields or facilities
for organized or participatory activities. Passive recreational facilities are those used for natural
areas, visual areas, or sitting/rest areas.
Table 26
City of Southport
Public Beach and Waterfront Access Sites
Handicap Parking Dune Board- Picnic Nature
Access Restroom Shower Spaces Crossing walk Garden Table Pier Trail
City Dock E. Yes No No No No No No No Yes No
Bay St.
Historic Yes No No No No No Yes No Yes No
Riverwalk
Downtown
Source: NC Division of Coastal Management.
There are several significant open space areas which add to the attractive landscape which exists
in Southport. These include Fort Johnston, Northwood Cemetery, Old Smithville Burial Grounds,
John Smith Cemetery, Old Morse Family Cemetery, and the entire riverfront shoreline area along
Bay and Brunswick Streets. Many of these areas have historical significance.
The city contains the State Ports Authority facilities, located on Brunswick Street (Southport
Marina). The facility is operated by a private vendor and contains wet slips for 114 boats. Two
concrete boat ramps are provided.
Alvin C. Caviness Park, located on Owens Street between Clarendon Avenue and North Caswell
Avenue, currently contains one full and one half -court basketball facilities and a children's
playground. The city is currently seeking grant funding to rehabilitate this park. The fund will
be used to upgrade the existing facilities, as well as improve the overall character of Caviness
Park.
The Southport Marina serves a considerable amount of transient traffic. The peak transient
seasons usually include 2'/z months in both the spring and fall. In a normal year, approximately
3,000 transient boats visit the marina, most stopping for one night. There is an average of three
persons on each boat. Most passengers go into Southport for supplies and/or dining. Thus, the
economic impact on Southport is significant. Data on expenditures is not available. However,
if these passengers averaged spending only $150 per person, the annual economic impact would
be $1,350,000.
Restrooms and pump out facilities are also provided. Table 27 provides a summary of Southport's
marina facilities.
I
I
0
of
0
n
I
0
I
11
I
I
I
0
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-75 0

oTable 27
City of Southport
aCommercial
Marinas and Dockages
Pump-
Wet
Dry
Ramp
Repair
Restroom out Fuel Liftout Restrnt
Slips
Stack
Moorings
Indigo
NO
NO
YES YES YES NO NO
35
NO
NO
Plantation
Marina
O
Southport
NO
NO
NO NO NO NO NO
32
NO
NO
City Dock
Old Yacht
NO
YES
YES NO DIESEL NO YES
50
NO
NO
o
Basin
Southport
YES
YES
YES YES GAS and YES YES
114
88
20
Marina
DIESEL
a
Willis Boat
YES
YES
NO NO NO YES NO
NO
NO
NO
Yard
Source: North
Carolina Division
of Coastal Management and the City of Southport.
O8. Drainage
Because of elevation, topography, and soil conditions, drainage is a serious problem within
�j Southport's planning jurisdiction. The following summarizes those areas which continue to have
drainage difficulties during periods of heavy rainfall:
oSouth Howe Street near the Cape Fear River including the city parking lot at Waterfront
Park.
► Intersection of Caswell and Bay Streets.
o Central section of Fodale Avenue.
o The City of Southport has corrected several areas that were susceptible to flooding through the
installation of storm drains and isolated lines. These isolated lines are not interconnected with
the city's sewer system but are essentially "dead ends" containing several drainage holes allowing
for infiltration. However, the floodprone areas described above have not been addressed and
continue to present problems during periods of heavy rainfall. There are currently construction
Uplans in place to address the problem at Fodale Avenue.
I
I
0
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-76
0

I
9. Health Services
The City of Southport and the citizens of Smithville Township are provided comprehensive
medical care by J. Arthur Dosher Memorial Hospital. The hospital was founded in 1930, and
celebrated its 70th Anniversary in the year 2000. The facility is owned by the taxpayers of
Smithville Township and is managed by an elected Board of Trustees. The hospital has 40 beds,
a staff of approximately 150, and serves over 20,000 inpatients and outpatients annually. Two
fully -staffed operating rooms provide general surgery as well as orthopedic, ophthalmology,
gynecological, and urological surgery. Other services include state of the art radiology, physical
therapy, cardiopulmonary, pharmacy, speech therapy, and laboratory services. The hospital
maintains a fully -staffed emergency room around the clock and provides home services through
its home care department. Dosher Memorial Hospital is committed to providing comprehensive
medical care to the citizens of Smithville Township. The hospital recently completed an
expansion which included the addition of a Skilled Nursing Facility.
10. Cable Services
Cable Television Service is provided by Time Warner Cable. The cable system provides service
to approximately 1,000 customers.
11. Electrical System and Energy Generating Facilities
The City of Southport owns and operates its own electrical distribution system which provides
electrical service to all areas within its planning jurisdiction. In January, 2001, the system had
a total of 2,064 subscribers including 1,715 households and 349 commercial businesses.
Southport purchases its electricity through the North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency
(NCEMPA), who in turn purchases it from Carolina Power and Light (CPEtL). The electrical
distribution system has no major deficiencies and will continue to be maintained and upgraded
as necessary.
Southport has made several improvements to its electrical system including the rebuilding of
aging lines, extensive tree trimming, and fusing coordination. In addition, the city has initiated
a rate system based on load management participation. This program lowered some household
electric bills by almost 40% and is widely supported by the community.
The Cogentrix steam -generating plant is the only energy generating facilities located within the
city's extraterritorial jurisdiction. The CPEtL Nuclear Power Plant is located immediately north
of the city's ETJ. Some of the CPEtL property is located within the city's ETJ. The city will
consider the need for expansion of the Cogentrix and other energy facilities on a case -by -case
basis, judging the need for expansion against all identified possible adverse impacts. The
location of energy production facilities is regulated by the city's zoning ordinance.
The locations of community facilities in Southport are provided on Map 15.
n
0
0
0
III
I
I
0
I
1
I
0
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan 1-77
I

U
I
I
I
U
I
I
0
I
I
MAP 15
City of Southport
Community Facilities Map
1. Waterfront Park and Pier
2. City Hall/Police Department
3. Post Office
4. Fire and Rescue
5. City Gym
6. Senior Citizen's Center
7. Old Yacht Basin
8. S.P.A. Boat Harbor
9. Sewage Treatment Plant
10. Northwood Cemetery
11. John Smith Cemetery
12. Old Morse Family Cemetery
13. Brunswick Community College
14. Tennis Courts
15. Southport Elementary School
16. Stephens Park Little League
17. City Garage
18. Southport -Fort Fisher Ferry
19. J. Arthur Dosher Hospital
20. Art Gallery
21. Senior Citizen's Clubhouse
22. Old Smithville Burial Ground
23. City of Southport Community Building
N
500 0 500 1000 Feet
W E
S
The preparation of this document was financed in part through a
grant provided by the North Carolina Coastal Management
Program, through funds provided by the Coastal Zone Management
Act of 1972, as amended, which is administered by the Office
of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.
PAGE 1-78

I
0 SECTION II: PROJECTED LAND DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS
0 A. PROJECTED DEMOGRAPHIC DATA
0 1. Permanent Population
aa. Regional and County
Brunswick County's population growth can be best compared to that occurring in other
North Carolina coastal counties. There are twenty coastal counties under the regulation of the
Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA). Fifteen of the twenty CAMA counties are expected to
experience population growth between the years 2000 and 2020. Of the fifteen counties
experiencing growth, Brunswick County is expected to see the second highest increase in
population (30.6%) behind Pender County (31.6%). This substantial increase in permanent
population surpasses the growth forecast for all of North Carolina by 11.3%.
Table 28
O CAMA-Regulated Counties and State
Total Population and Percent Change, 2000-2020
% Change
County
2000
2005
2010
2020
2000-2020
a
Beaufort
44,958
46,207
47,231
48,755
18,347
8.4%
Bertie
19,773
19,437
19,075
-7.2%
Brunswick
73,143
83,881
93,753
112,885
54.3%
aCamden
6,885
7,380
7,852
8,794
27.7%
Carteret
59,383
62,542
65,303
70,365
18.5%
a
Chowan
14,526
14,934
15,351
16,026
10.3%
Craven
91,436
95,841
99,126
105,982
15.9%
Currituck
18,190
20,391
22,599
27,060
48.8%
47.0%
Dare
29,967
33,505
37,112
44,061
Gates
10,516
11,059
11,663
12,869
22.4%
aHertford
22,601
22,664
22,695
22,679
0.3%
Hyde
5,826
6,021
6,132
6,310
8.3%
New Hanover
160,307
179,877
197,901
233,681
45.8%
Onslow
150,355
157,690
162,855
175,762
16.9%
a
Pamlico
12,934
34,897
13,559
36,639
14,157
38,309
15,095
41,567
16.7%
19.1%
Pasquotank
Pender
41,082
47,180
52,761
64,106
55.1%
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan
II-1

Table 28 (continued)
% Change
County 2000 2005 2010 2020 2000-2020
Perquimans 11,368 11,732 12,154 12,873 13.2%
Tyrrell
Washington
Total CAMA Counties
State of NC
4,149 4,248 4,373 4,534 9.3%
A
7
n
13,723
13,537
13,299
12,823 -6.6%
826,019
888,324
943,701
1,054,574 28.0%
a
8,049,313
8,784,896
9,468,786
10,985,220 36.5%
Source: North Carolina Office of State Planning.
b. City of Southport
Population projections for the City of Southport and Brunswick County have been
prepared through the year 2020. The population projections are provided in Table 29. it is
emphasized that the forecasts do not take into consideration annexations which may occur. As
a result, some populations may prove to be above the figures that are forecast.
Table 29
City of Southport and Brunswick County
Population Forecasts
Municipality
2000
2005
2010
2015
2020
Southport
2,351
2,696
3,013
3,333
3,628
Total Municipalities
24,100
27,638
30,891
34,167
37,195
Total Unincorporated
49,043
56,243
62,862
69,528
75,690
Brunswick County Total
73,143
83,881
93,753
103,695
112,885
Source: Holland Consulting Planners, Inc.
The population for Brunswick County overall is expected to increase from 73,143 to 112,885
between the years 2000 and 2020. This shows a total increase of 54.3% and an average annual
increase of 2.7%. The permanent population of Southport is forecasted to increase at the same
rate as the county.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan II-2

I
D2. City of Southport Seasonal Population
The city's peak seasonal population can be defined as the population that would be enumerated
in all seasonal housing units if all of those units were occupied at full capacity. Seasonal housing
units include 1) all single-family and multi -family private housing units used by the overnight
tourist population rather than the permanent population; 2) all motel/hotel rooms (including bed
and breakfasts); 3) all seasonal and transient campground sites; and 4) all individual marina wet
slips capable of docking boats of a size and type which can house people overnight. Marina
facilities for fueling/repair only (no overnight dockage), and those that only dock commercial
fishing boats, are excluded from the enumeration of seasonal housing units.
0 There has not been a significant increase in the city's number of seasonal housing units since the
city completed its last CAMA land use plan updated in 1997. In 2000, the city's total peak
Dpopulation was 4,284, of which 1,623 was attributed to the city's peak seasonal population (see
page 1-11). The city's peak seasonal population is not expected to increase significantly during
the next 10 years. However, if the city's peak seasonal population growth paralleled that of the
permanent population (25.2%), the peak seasonal population should increase to 2,032 by 2010.
O It is expected that Southport will continue to attract large numbers of day visitors during the
spring and summer months. The number of people visiting the Southport 2000 Visitor Center
provides a good indicator of the impact of tourism on the city. Between 1998 and 2000, visitors
ato the Visitor's Center increased 29%. The following provides a brief summary of visitation at the
Center: 1997 - 24,462 visitors (10-month period); 1998 - 42,387 visitors; 1999 - 44,436 visitors;
0 and 2000 - 54,864 visitors.
Day visitation to Southport is expected to continue to increase over the next ten years. As a
a result, day visitors may have a greater impact on the provision of city services than that required
to serve the city's seasonal population.
a3. Commercial and Industrial Development
Commercial development in Southport has been occurring fairly rapidly. As discussed earlier in
this plan, between 1995-2000, there were 27 building permits issued for commercial development
of which 23 were issued between 1998-2000. Although commercial development is not
C anticipated to take place at as rapid a rate as between 1998-2000, it is expected to continue and
will have a significant impact on Southport. it will be a challenge for the city to provide for
orderly, well planned commercial development, in the right amount and in the right locations.
Commercial development is anticipated to primarily occur along the Howe Street corridor and
surrounding the NC 211 /NC 87 intersection. The city should rely heavily on the future land use
map included in this plan to control the amount and locations of commercial development. In
addition, the city should continue to enforce its Commercial Design and Development Standards
(� to ensure the quality of commercial development.
U City of Southport Comprehensive Plan II-3

The City of Southport does not anticipate significant industrial development to occur in the
immediate future. In the event that industrial development does occur, the city will encourage
it to locate in the far eastern portion of the city in areas zoned for industrial development.
However, if additional industrial development does occur in this area, it should be done carefully
so as not to infringe on existing residential areas. Industries should be required to provide
adequate vegetative buffers on their property whenever adjacent to areas zoned for residential
use.
4. Housing Trends
The majority of the residential development occurring in Southport has located within the
following major subdivisions: Indigo Plantation, Forest Oaks, Harbor Oaks, and River Landing.
During the late 1990s, the city averaged 27 new housing units per year. Assuming there were
approximately 1,500 housing units in Southport at the time this plan was drafted and based on
the growth that has occurred, by the year 2010 there could be approximately 1,770 housing units
in Southport. However, it should be stressed that this is a rough estimate. Any large multi-
family developments that occur could prove this figure to be low.
There is sufficient vacant, developable real estate to accommodate residential growth, at
current growth rates, well beyond the year 2020. The main limiting factor for all development
in Southport will be the city's ability to provide water and especially sewer service.
As Southport's existing housing stock ages, the need to address substandard housing will intensify.
The major concentrations of substandard housing will continue to be in the Rhett Street area and
an area that is generally bounded by West 11 `h Street, Lord Street, Brown Street, and Burrington
Avenue. Outside the city's incorporated area, the Jabbertown Road area continues to remain
a concentration of substandard housing. The city has had good success in improving overall
housing conditions through the implementation of Community Development Block Grant projects
and enforcement of the minimum housing code. in order to address substandard housing, the city
will continue to actively pursue state and federal housing assistance funds.
5. Public Land Use
The city does not anticipate significant public land acquisition in the near future. Although
police, fire, and rescue equipment and facilities will be continuously improved to remain current,
land acquisition is not expected to be a part of these improvements. However, the city has been
seeking grant funding assistance to upgrade its water distribution system and construct a new
elevated water storage tank. Therefore, a relatively minor land acquisition may be required to
locate the storage tank.
ll
11
it
11
I
11
r
I
7
I
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan II-4 0

it
aThe city has discussed the desire to extend its Riverwalk from the City Pier to the east
approximately 500 feet. However, the piece of property necessary to accommodate this
0 improvement is owned by the Army Corps of Engineers. The city will continue its efforts to
acquire a license agreement from the Corps so that this improvement can be pursued.
0 6. Areas Likelyto o Experience Maior Land Use Changes
Major deviations in existing patterns of land use, as described in this comprehensive plan, are
not expected to occur during the planning period. Vacant land will be gradually developed
primarily for residential uses and, to a lesser extent, commercial use. Residential development
will continue in a west/northwest direction while commercial uses will continue along Howe
Street/NC 211. Although consistent with existing land use patterns, annexations and public
utilities extensions may accelerate development in certain areas and sewer extensions will
Qincrease density in the ETJ. The Division of Community Assistance is currently working on an
annexation study for the city to determine which areas meet statutory requirements. This study
is not anticipated to be complete until early in the year 2001. However, following completion
of the study, the city will likely pursue the annexation of several areas.
I
I
I
I
Re -zonings that have occurred recently on Robert Ruark Drive and on Ferry Road may eventually
lead to some significant changes in land use as the owners of these properties pursue
development opportunities.
The development of new thoroughfares in the city could have a significant impact on land use
patterns. The transportation portion of this section discusses the City of Southport Thoroughfare
Plan and includes a map illustrating the approximate locations of proposed thoroughfares.
Although the construction of these thoroughfares will not likely take place within the next five
years, it is important that the city protect easements and plan for these improvements so that
they can become a reality. The future land use map that has been provided in this plan includes
provisions and appropriate land uses for these potential corridors.
B. PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT NEEDS AND LAND USE ISSUES
1. Introduction
The purpose of this section is to identify the demand for new or improved public facilities based
on existing demand and the projections that have been provided in Parts A and B of this section.
This section concludes with a summary of public facility needs.
I
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan II-5

2. Water Supply
As previously discussed in this plan, Southport's water system is interconnected with that of
Brunswick County. This connection provides the city with approximately 40% of its water.
However, the city is currently considering increasing the percentage of water it receives from
the county. The Brunswick County water system has a total system capacity of 30 million gallons
per day (gpd), of which approximately 50% is currently being utilized. As a result, the City of
Southport does not anticipate any problems relating to the supply of water. However, the city
does have the need to increase its water storage capacity. At the present time, the city's water
system includes only one elevated storage tank with a capacity of 150,000 gallons. The city is
actively pursuing available grant funds that will assist with the cost of a new 150,000 gallon
elevated storage tank. In addition, Brunswick County and Southport have had discussions about
a possible joint venture to construct a tank between Pelican Building Supply and Wal-Mart.
However, no decision had been made at the time this plan was drafted. Following the
construction of a second elevated storage tank, the city will have a combined storage capacity
of over 300,000 gallons.
In addition to the construction of a second storage tank, there is a need to refurbish/replace
aging main and secondary water distribution lines and install a third groundwater well. As with
all of the city's public facilities, there will be an ongoing need for the maintenance of what is
existing and in the event of annexation, the city will need to extend service to newly annexed
areas.
3. Sewer
Southport's wastewater treatment plants have a combined capacity of 800,000 gpd. The current
average daily flow into the system, as averaged over the five-year period from 1997-2001,
is 518,000 gpd. Taking into consideration an additional contracted allocation of 100,000 gpd
to the Southeast Brunswick Sanitary District (SBSD), the city is left with an excess capacity
of 182,000 gpd. This number is only 22,000 gpd above the state recommended 20% reserve
margin of 160,000 gpd. Several planned urban developments are proposed and have asked
the city for nearly 105,000 gpd additional over the next five years. This would leave the city
with only 77,000 gpd by 2006, providing a margin of less than 10% of the plant's capacity.
If such circumstances arise, the state will impose a mandated moratorium. Given the
additional facts that the city's aging collection system is operating at or near capacity,
despite annual upgrades, and that the collection system continues to experience inflow and
infiltration problems, the overall sewage treatment situation is nearing a critical juncture.
In order to combat this problem and regulate growth while searching for a solution to the
problem, in July 2000, the City of Southport Board of Aldermen imposed a sewer moratorium on
the consideration and approval of any development projects containing 30 or more units or lots,
or developments over 15 acres in size. The moratorium was still in effect at the time this plan
was drafted.
0
Ell
I
I
0
I
11
I
I
I
I
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan II-6
0

I
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
As discussed in Section I, the state is requiring Southport to relocate its wastewater treatment
discharge site. Plans for the relocation need to be in place before the state will issue Southport's
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit in 2006.
Brunswick County and its municipalities, including Southport, are having discussions regarding
the installation of a regional sewer collection and treatment system. The city would benefit
through the implementation of such a system because the cost of installation, maintenance, and
improvements would be distributed between all agencies involved. According to the county, if
regional sewer plans are successful, construction could be initiated as early as the year 2003.
However, the city's public works director believes this estimate to be somewhat optimistic and
that the year 2005 may be closer to reality. During several of the Comprehensive Plan Major
Streets/Public Services Committee meetings, concern was expressed over the need for the city
to have a "back up" plan in case efforts to regionalize the county's sewer system fail.
4. Solid Waste Disposal
The City of Southport will continue to contract with a private hauler for its solid waste disposal
and recycling needs. As a result, there are no public facility needs related to solid waste
disposal.
5. Schools
As discussed in Section I, Southport's school -aged population is served by the following Brunswick
County schools: Southport Elementary, South Brunswick Middle School, and South Brunswick High
School. These schools also serve students from Boiling Spring Lakes, Bolivia, and Oak Island. The
three schools serving the residents of Southport had a combined enrollment of 2,390 during the
1999/2000 school year.
The City of Southport's population is expected to increase from 2,661 to 3,331 between 1999 and
D2010. The growth that has been forecast yields a net gain of 670 persons. Based on historic
trends, approximately 15% of the city's total population may be comprised of school -aged
D persons. As a result, Brunswick County Schools may have to accommodate an additional 101
students from Southport by the year 2010. Assuming that these additional students will be
divided between the three schools listed above, the impact on the school system from Southport
D will be relatively minor during the next ten years. However, Brunswick County as a whole is one
of the fastest growing counties in the state, if not the fastest. As a result, there will be a
significant amount of pressure placed on the entire school system as a result of growth.
0
Recent improvements to the schools serving Southport include the construction of an eleven (11)
D room addition to the South Brunswick Middle School, completed in September 1999, and plans
for a new elementary school. The new elementary school will accommodate approximately 650
pupils and will be located on Highway 211 approximately five miles southeast of Supply.
D
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan II-7
D

Brunswick County Schools has prepared a Strategic Plan for Excellent Schools 2000-2004. This
plan was too lengthy for inclusion in this plan but can be reviewed at the following website:
www. brunswickcountyschoots.org/administrator/strategic plan. asp. The plan includes strategic
priorities and goals for the next four years. The school system will need to stay committed to
accomplishing these goals to ensure adequate facilities for the future. Unfortunately, the city
has little control over the school system and will have to rely on the county to a large extent to
provide adequate service.
6. Police. Fire, and Emergency Medical
Police, fire, and emergency medical services are expected to remain adequate in meeting
demand during the planning period. Beyond the possibilities of expanding existing personnel and
the purchase of equipment, no major improvements are expected to take place. As discussed
in Section I, it is anticipated that as annexations occur and the city expands northward,
additional police, fire, and rescue services as well as a more central location than Nash Street
may become necessary. However, these improvements are not expected to be needed during
the planning period.
In estimating the impact of growth, planning standards for public services have been estimated;
the following figures are averages, and are intended to help quantify the impacts of growth: Per
1,000 persons in population growth, a city is likely to need two additional staff persons, 0.6
vehicles, and 200 square feet of facility space for law enforcement. Likewise, fire protection
will involve 1.65 personnel, 0.2 vehicles, and 250 square feet of facility space for every
1,000 persons. Increased demand on emergency medical services amounts to 36.5 calls per
1,000 population, one vehicle, and 4.1 full-time personnel per 30,000 persons.
As previously discussed, Southport is expected to have a net gain of approximately 670 persons
during the next ten years. Based on this assumption, the following provides a summary of
additional equipment and staffing required to accommodate growth:
Police Fire EMS
Vehicles
No demand
No demand
No demand
Square Feet
134
168
No demand
Staff
1
1
No demand
Calls
No demand
No demand
24
As reflected above, the impact on the city's police, fire, and EMS services from anticipated
population growth is relatively minor. However, as discussed elsewhere in this plan, these
estimates do not include population growth resulting from annexation. it is anticipated that
within the next two to three years, the city will pursue the annexation of unincorporated areas.
However, it is impossible to estimate the impact from these annexations at this time.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan II-8

I
I
I
I
I
0
I
I
I
C
I
Furthermore, when the city decides on areas for annexation, a detailed annexation report will
need to be prepared describing how all city services will be extended/provided to the area.
7. Recreation
Although there are a fair amount of recreational facilities in Southport, during the development
of this plan, the following needs were identified:
► Expansion of Riverwalk from the City Pier to the east approximately 500 feet.
► Additional sidewalks on the west side of the city.
► Additional boat docking facilities in Yacht Basin area.
► Public restroom facilities downtown (for the lack of a better place, this need is listed
under Recreation).
► Renovate existing parks.
► Community recreation center/multi-purpose building.
The National Recreation and Parks Association published the Recreation, Parks, and Open Space
Standards and Guidelines to provide national guidelines which could serve as an expression of
reasonableness and adequacy with respect to quality service delivery. Table 30 provides a
summary of the national standards for selected recreational facilities and Southport's existing
and future demand for new facilities.
Table 30
National Recreation Standards and Demand for Facilities in Southport
Standard
Existing Facility
Demand'
Year 2010 Facility
Demand"
Baseball
1 per 10,000 persons
No demand
No demand
League Softball
1 per 4,000 persons
No demand
No demand
Practice Fields
1 per 3,000 persons
+1
No demand
Youth Baseball Fields
1 per 3,000 persons
No demand
No demand
Tennis Courts
1 per 1,000 persons
+1
No demand
Football/Soccer
1 per 6,000 persons
No demand
No demand
Amphitheaters
1 per 20,000 persons
No demand
No demand
Swimming
900 square feet per 1,000 persons
+2,395 sf
+603 sf
"This column represents the number of additional facilities the city currently needs to serve its existing
population.
"This column represents the number of additional facilities the city will need to serve a population of
approximately 3,331 in 2010.
Source: National Recreation and Parks Association.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan II-9

As indicated in Table 30, according to National Recreation Standards, the city has a demand for
additional tennis courts, a practice field, and a swimming facility. In addition, there appears
to be a need for skateboard facilities. However, it should be noted that these guidelines reflect
professional judgment, rather than an assessment of community needs, and no two communities
are the same. Furthermore, many communities have found the national guidelines difficult to
meet. Therefore, the pursuit of achieving national recreation standards should not take the
place of common sense and recognizing the needs of the community. Finally, the fact that
Southport's geographical setting provides a unique opportunity for a variety of outdoor
recreational activities reduces some of the pressure on the city to pursue national guidelines.
The shoreline access sites in the city provide access to open space along the shoreline where
residents can enjoy recreational activities such as boating, fishing, and walking. These access
sites definitely add to the city's recreation and parks inventory and provide a service which the
national recreational standards do not take into account. It should also be noted that many
communities have taken out basketball courts or are not constructing additional courts because
they are often a breeding ground for illegal activity.
8. Drainage
Section I of this plan described five areas where drainage problems currently exist (see page 1-75
for a more detailed description of these areas). These areas were South Howe Street, the
intersection of Caswell and Bay Streets, and Fodale Avenue. There are construction plans in
place to address the problem at Fodale Avenue. However, the city will need to work to address
the problems at the remaining areas listed above.
9. Electrical System and Energy Facilities
The city's electrical distribution system has no major deficiencies and will continue to be
maintained and upgraded as necessary. The city has recently made an agreement with Brunswick
Electric to take over the maintenance and operation of the city's system. As a result, the city
will save approximately $100,000 annually. However, it should be noted that the city has no
interest at this time in selling its electric system.
The city has expressed interest in moving some of its electrical lines underground as funds
become available. New subdivisions are required by ordinance to place their utilities
underground.
10. Transportation
North Carolina's Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a document which lists all major
construction projects the Department plans for the next six years. Similar to local Capital
Improvement Program projects, TIP projects are matched with projected funding sources.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan II-10 0

I
I
I
0
I
I
0
I
Each year when the TIP is updated, completed projects are removed, programmed projects are
advanced, and new projects are added.
During annual TIP public hearings, municipalities request projects to be included in the TIP. A
Board of Transportation member reviews all of the project requests in a particular area of the
state. Based on the technical feasibility, need, and available funding, the board member decides
which projects will be included in the TIP. In addition to highway construction and widening, TIP
funds are available for bridge replacement projects, highway safety projects, public transit
projects, railroad projects, and bicycle projects.
There is only one highway improvement project included in the 2000-2006 TIP which may have
an impact on Southport's highway transportation system. It should be noted that this project is
located outside of the city's ETJ. This project is listed as follows:
Length
Total Est.
Cost
Schedule
Route/
(MI)
Cost
Estimates
(Fiscal
City
ID No. Location and Description
(KM)
(Thou.)
Work Type
(Thou.)
Years)
New
R-3324 NC 211-133 to NC 87 at SR 1565,
1.2
3,757
Planning
FY01
Route
Construct a two lane connector
1.9
Design
FY04
on new location
Right -of- way
887
FFY06
Construction
2,871
Post Years
a In addition to the TIP, Southport has its own thoroughfare plan that was adopted in July, 2000.
A thoroughfare plan identifies existing and anticipated future deficiencies in the transportation
system and uncovers the need for new facilities. The thoroughfare plan also provides a
representation of the existing highway system by functional use, which includes major
thoroughfares, minor thoroughfares, and the local street system.
0 The city's thoroughfare plan includes the following summary of traffic control/problem areas:
D NC 211 from 12t' Street to Beach Road: This facility serves as the "gateway" to Southport
being the main entrance and really only one of two ways to get to the area. This is a
partially tree lined roadway that is currently a two-lane facility.
aNC 87/NC 133 from planning area boundary to NC 211: These facilities serve as an
aentrance to the Southport area bringing traffic south from 1-40 and the Wilmington area.
► Dosher Cut -Off Road: This facility serves as a "short cut" for traffic coming down
NC 87/NC 133 with a final destination in the vicinity of Oak Island. While it does not
directly affect traffic in the Southport corporate limits, it does affect traffic coming into
the Southport area and traffic exiting the Southport area headed to Oak Island.
a NC 211 through Central Business District Howe Street
g ( )
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan II-11

► NC Ferry Operation Traffic: This also includes industrial traffic from the same side of the
city.
► Direct connection from Southport to Oak Island that would serve as an alternative to
NC 211 /NC 133.
Capacity deficiencies exist primarily in two locations at the end of the planning horizon, in the
year 2025. Traffic congestion is expected to worsen along NC 211 from Beach Road into
Southport and through the city to Leonard Street. It is also expected to worsen on NC 87/NC 133
coming south, utilizing the Dosher Cut -Off Road and heading towards Oak Island. Leonard Street
should be extended to intersect with Highway 87. Map 16 provides the locations of recommended
thoroughfare improvements and provides estimated average annual daily traffic (AADT) count
data for the year 2025.
11. Summary
The following provides a summary of public facilities needs:
► Refurbish/replace water distribution system (main and secondary lines)
► Need for a second elevated water tank
► Reduce inflow/infiltration in sewer collection system
► Improve/expand sewer collection system
► Improve/update lift stations for sewer collection system
► Significantly rehabilitate WWTP, or alternately connect with county regional plant
► Establish plan for putting electric distribution system underground
► Resurface a minor portion of city streets
► Storm drain improvements to several locations (Stuart and Fodale)
► Additional sidewalks
► Public restroom facilities
► Extend Riverwalk east of City Pier
► Provide additional boat docking facilities in Yacht Basin area.
► Improve the appearance of the downtown pump station
► Implementation of thoroughfare plan
C. REDEVELOPMENT ISSUES
Southport's greatest continuing redevelopment issue will be the preservation and renovation of
housing for its low -to -moderate income families and individuals. As stated earlier in this section,
under Housing Trends, the Rhett Street area and an area generally bounded by West 11 th Street,
Lord Street, Brown Street, and Burrington Avenue contain the most severe substandard housing
conditions remaining in Southport.
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan II-12
I �

0 The City of Southport has been extremely successful in the rehabilitation of its downtown and
the preservation of its waterfront, and serves as an example to other coastal North Carolina
communities. However, this is an ongoing endeavor and remains relevant during the planning
0 period.
The final area of concern and potentially the most significant is the redevelopment of areas
following a hurricane or other natural disaster. The specifics of such redevelopment are dealt
a with in the 1997 City of Southport CAMA Land Use Plan, storm hazard mitigation and post -disaster
reconstruction section. However, Southport will support the reconstruction of any properties
destroyed by natural disaster, consistent with applicable city ordinances.
QThe city will undertake the following in support of redevelopment:
QRemoval of substandard dwelling units through enforcement of the city's minimum
housing code.
► Support applications for North Carolina Community Development housing rehabilitation
funds.
► Support applications for North Carolina Housing Finance Agency home improvement funds.
(� Continued protection of both the downtown and waterfront areas.
Continue to capitalize on the waterfront as the key to downtown revitalization.
► Recognize and protect significant natural and aesthetic resources, such as tree canopies
Oand existing park areas.
0
I
I
I
it
k
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan II-13

grant provided by the North Carolina Coastal Management r
Program, through funds provided by the Coastal Zone Management
Act of 1972, as amended, which is administered by the Office
of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.
MAP 16
City of Southport
Proposed Thoroughfare
and Average Annual
Daily Traffic Counts
for 2025
Legend
Average Annual Daily Traffic Count - 2025
Proposed Thoroughfare
Corporate Boundary
A/
ETJ
1 Mile Outside of ETJ
0 3000 Feet
PAGE II-14

0
in
0
SECTION III: FUTURE LAND USE PLAN
A. INTRODUCTION
The future land use plan or "map" is an essential tool for implementing land use planning. The
map is intended to serve as a guide for the Planning Board and Board of Aldermen when they
review private development proposals and make decisions on the location of public facilities.
The land use plan also provides the framework upon which zoning and subdivision regulations and
the capital improvements program should be based. in fact, the preparation of a land use plan
and map is mandated by legislation as a prerequisite for zoning. North Carolina General Statute
153A-341 states that:
Zoning regulations shall be made in accordance with a comprehensive plan and
designed to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic and
other dangers; to promote health and the general welfare; to provide adequate
light and air; to prevent the overcrowding of land; to avoid undue concentration
Qof population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water,
sewerage, schools, parks, and other public requirements. The regulations shall
be made with reasonable consideration, among other things, as to the character
of the district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses, and with a view to
conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of
n land throughout the jurisdiction.
A land use plan is intended to accomplish three primary objectives. These objectives are as
(� follows:
► To promote economic efficiency by coordinating the size and location of publicly provided
future community facilities with the location and intensity of future private residential,
commercial, and industrial activity.
DTo optimize resources by allocating land for its most suitable use. For example, a city
may want to encourage industrial development on sites accessible to existing water and
0 sewer lines and in areas with suitable soil conditions. Or, a city may choose to arrange
land uses in such a way as to protect environmentally sensitive areas.
OTo provide a land use form that reflects the vision of the city's residents, is unified,
avoids conflicting land uses, optimizes resources, preserves the city's character and is
pleasing: providing open space, vistas and distinguishable districts.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan III-1
Q

It is important that Southport understands that merely completing the land use plan, illustrating
the city's vision for the future, does not ensure that its objectives will be met. The City of
Southport must continuously work at accomplishing plan implementation and maintaining an
effective planning program. Changes to Southport's management of growth should occur. In
contemporary planning, the most discussed concept is "smart development." In reality, this
concept is not a new idea. It is simply the blending of many existing ideas. Smart development
adheres to six basic principals which are described as follows:
Principle 1: Efficient Use of Land Resources
Smart development supports the preservation of land and natural resources. These benefits
result from compact building forms, in -fill development, and moderation in street and parking
standards. Compact building patterns preserve land for city and neighborhood parks as well as
local woods and wetlands. Furthermore, compact development shortens trips, lessening
dependence on the automobile, and therefore reducing levels of energy consumption and air
pollution. Finally, a compact development pattern supports more cost-effective infrastructure
than does low -density fringe development.
Principle 2: Full Use of Urban Services
The same frugality of land development supports efficient use of public and private
infrastructure. Smart development means creating neighborhoods where more people will use
existing services like water lines and sewers, roads, emergency services, and schools. Inefficient
land use, whether within or outside urban areas, places a financial strain on communities trying
to provide for the construction and maintenance of infrastructure needs.
Building compactly does not mean that all areas must be densely developed. Rather, the goal
is an average density for the area, at a level that makes full use of urban services. Averaging
allows for areas to have a mix of low-, medium-, and high -density development. Mixing densities
to encourage efficient use of services also means requiring a high level of building and siting
compatibility, encouraging neighborhoods to have both character and privacy.
Careful street sizing and the accommodation of some parking on streets reduces impervious
surfaces and efficiently uses urban services by saving on land acquisition, construction, and
maintenance costs. In short, streets should be sized for their use: lower density areas that have
little through traffic are best served by slower, narrower streets, while transportation corridors
that move district -wide traffic need wider travelways.
Principle 3: Mix of Uses
Locating stores, offices, residences, schools, and recreation spaces within walking distance of
each other in compact neighborhoods with pedestrian -oriented streets promotes:
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan III-2

I
I
I
0
0
I
I
0
I
[II
0
I
► independence of movement, especially for the young and the elderly who can
conveniently walk, cycle, or ride transit;
► safety in commercial areas, through around -the -clock presence of people;
► reduction in auto use, especially for shorter trips;
► support for those who work at home, through nearby services and parks; and
► a variety of housing choices, so that the young and old, singles and families, and those
of varying economic ability may find places to live.
Mixed -use examples include a corner store in a residential area, an apartment near or over a
shop, and a lunch counter in an industrial zone. Most codes prohibit the co -location of any
residential and commercial buildings. This prohibition is based on the functional and
architectural incompatibility of the buildings. Using design standards, in tandem with mixed -use
zoning, overcomes incompatibility. Additionally, limitations on commercial functions, such as
hours of operation and delivery truck access, may be necessary. More fundamentally, to gain the
full benefits of a mix of uses, buildings must be conveniently connected by streets and paths.
Otherwise, people will still be inclined or required to use cars, even for the shortest trips.
Principle 4: Transportation Options
Transportation must be safe, convenient, and interesting. These performance factors affect
sidewalk and street design, placement of parking, and location of building fronts, doors, and
windows. Well -designed bike lanes and sidewalks protect people from vehicle accidents.
Orienting windows and doorways to the sidewalk increases awareness of street activity and the
safety of the streetscape.
Convenience begins with a connected network of streets that provides alternative routes with
reasonable walking distances between destinations. A properly designed network also promotes
neighborhood safety by routing the heaviest traffic around neighborhoods, without sacrificing
street connectivity.
Providing compact, mixed -use development connected by safe, convenient, and interesting
networks of streets and paths promotes:
► walking, cycling, and transit as viable, attractive alternatives to driving;
(� less traffic congestion and air pollution;
U the convenience, density, and variety of uses necessary to support transit;
► a variety of alternative routes, thereby dispersing traffic congestion; and
► lower traffic speeds, making neighborhoods safer.
0
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan III-3
0

Principle 5: Detailed, Human -Scale Design
Community acceptance of compact, mixed -use development requires compatibility between
buildings to ensure privacy, safety, and visual coherency. Similar massing of buildings,
orientation of buildings to the street, the presence of windows, doors, porches, and other
architectural elements, and effective use of landscaping all contribute to successful compatibility
between diverse building types.
Human -scale design is also critical to the success of streets and paths as preferred routes for
pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists alike. In general, smart street design considers the role of
pedestrians along with that of vehicular traffic, emphasizing the quality of the walking
environment. For instance, parallel parking may be considered a hindrance to vehicle flow, but,
for pedestrians and shop owners, on -street parking is a benefit because it reduces speeding
traffic and protects the sidewalks.
Designing streets that are balanced for pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists promotes the
development of community through the informal meeting of neighbors. Neighborhood safety is
improved, since neighbors can more easily come to know one another and watch over each
other's homes.
Principle 6: Development Review
Southport's ability to adopt smart development principles will, of necessity, require an
examination of its development review process. Primarily, the review should focus on ways that
the review process can be streamlined so that developers are encouraged to apply the principles.
Frustrating, costly, and time-consuming delays due, in part, to inflexible standards, regulations,
and processes will discourage innovative approaches to development and design. Providing for
flexibility and certainty in the application of standards, and administrative approval of "minor"
variances, can help promote creative development that complies with the principles. Effective
use of Planned Residential Developments (PRD's) can also relieve some of the regulatory barriers
for developers and lighten the administrative load for planners, as can adopting a flexible process
for applying design review standards.
While the smart growth concept may not be suited to every community, it will support
Southport's objective of preserving its rural atmosphere and aid in preserving its natural
resources.
B. LAND USE CATEGORIES
Southport's Land Use Plan includes eight separate land use categories (see Map 17). Each land
use category has associated zoning districts. These zoning districts specify the allowable uses
for each of the land use categories. A complete list of the land use categories utilized in the
land use plan and the zoning districts that should be included in each category is provided below.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan III-4 a

I
e
0
0
0
0
I
I
I
G
I
in
I
LAND USE CATEGORIES and CORRESPONDING ZONING DISTRICTS:
OPEN SPACE/VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - OS, RA-20, R-3*
COMMERCIAL - C-2 and C-3
OFFICE/INSTITUTIONAL/MULTI-FAMILY - R-2 and PRD
HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - R-2 and PRD
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - R-1 and PRD
LOW -MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - RA-20, R-1, and PRD
INDUSTRIAL - 1-1 and 1-2
CBD MIXED USE - C-1, R-1, and R-2
*In some cases, the R-3 single- and two-family residential (mobile home) district may be
an allowable use in the open space/very low density residential land use category.
KEY TO ZONING DISTRICTS:
R-1 Single-family and two-family residential district
R-2 Multi -family residential district
R-3 Single- and two-family residential district
RA-20 Low density residential and agricultural district
C-1 Central business district
C-2 General business district
C-3 Specialized business district
1-1 Light industrial district
1-2 Heavy industrial district
OS Open space district
PRD Planned residential development
It should be noted that the city's future land use map covers an area that extends up to one mile
outside Southport's extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ). It is necessary for the city to have a plan
for the area outside of the existing ETJ in case Southport pursues ETJ expansion.
0 City of Southport Comprehensive Plan III-5

.All
ZOO

I
0 C. LOCATIONAL ASPECTS OF LAND USE
The purpose of this section is to describe the reasoning behind the location of land uses as shown
on the land use map. it should be noted that the land use plan depicts a desired or optimum
pattern of land uses. For land areas that are already developed, the desired land use may not
0 be consistent with the existing land use. In cases where the planning process resulted in a
desired land use that deviated from the existing land use, preferred land use is indicated. The
following provides an example of a case in which an existing land use would not be indicated on
the map: An industry might locate in an area that was considered "rural" ten years ago. As the
years go by, development occurs, urban areas of the city expand, and eventually the industry
finds itself in an urbanized setting surrounded by residential development. This situation has
resulted in a conflicting land use. In this case the existing land use of the industrial property is
industrial but might be shown on the land use map as Office/institutional/Multi-Family, a more
0 suitable and compatible use for a residential area.
0 Generally, the land use map was drafted with consideration given to key land use issues
(identified on page 1-35); preservation of the city's existing urban form which is comprised of
districts, paths, urban nodes, landmarks, and edges (see pages II-58 through II-61); development
0 constraints, existing zoning patterns, and citizen input. It should be stressed that although the
future land use map indicates a desired pattern for future land use, it is not being suggested that
the land uses portrayed cannot be deviated from. However, it is recommended that as the need
for changes in the land use map become apparent that the map be revised and approved by the
Board of Aldermen. A general description of land use by type follows.
0 1. Commercial
Commercial land uses in Southport's planning jurisdiction are concentrated in the Central
Business District, along Howe Street, and at the NC 211 /NC 87 intersection. Within the area that
extends up to one mile outside the city's ETJ, commercial land uses are located at the
intersections of a proposed thoroughfare connecting NC 87/NC133 to NC 211 and along NC 133
from NC 211 south to the Oak Island city limits.
There has been an attempt to locate commercial development in nodes. Nodes are typically
placed at the intersections of major thoroughfares. Nodes serve as community focus areas or
0 concentrations of high intensity land use. It should be noted that the location and size of these
commercial areas are not intended to be static. As the land around these commercial areas
develops, larger node definitions, and possibly even shifts in location from one area to another,
may be warranted. As commercial development takes place in the outlying areas of the city's
planning jurisdiction, it should be buffered from surrounding areas by office/institutional/multi-
0 family land uses or open space.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan III-7
0

2. Residential
Residential land uses have been divided into four separate land use categories based on
associated variable residential densities. These categories include: Open Space/Very Low, Low -
Medium, Medium, and High Density Residential. The location of residential land uses by density
was based on existing residential development patterns, constraints to development (i.e.
floodplains, wetlands, etc.), and the location of infrastructure such as water, sewer, and the
transportation network. Generally, the areas that contained few obstacles for development were
classified at higher densities than areas that possessed multiple obstacles for development.
Open Space/Very Low Density Residential land uses have been located in areas where there is
the potential for flooding (100-year floodplain), the need for buffering, or where an existing park
is present. Buffering is used to separate areas that may have the potential to become conflicting
land uses. It should be noted that the ideal land use for this category is open space as opposed
to very low density residential development. Residential development should only be allowed
in these areas on a limited basis and the development that does occur should have its finished
floor level substantially above the base flood elevation.
It should be noted that the land use plan does not attempt to delineate future park sites for the
following reason: If the city were to express interest in acquiring specific sites for public use too
far in advance it could drive the cost of real estate up unnecessarily. Open space buffers
adjacent to industrial development should be maintained at a width based on the type of industry
and its potential to create compatibility problems.
3. Industrial
There are no industrial land uses shown on the future land use map within the incorporated area
of Southport. Future industrial land use is concentrated in the north eastern section of the city's
ETJ and plus one mile area. Future industrial land uses have been located in this area in the
attempt to concentrate new uses near existing industrial land uses.
All of the industrial areas indicated on the Land Use Plan that are adjacent to residential land
uses have been buffered with open space land uses. Buffering has been provided to help prevent
land use conflicts between industrial development and neighboring land uses. The width of the
buffer should be based on the type of industry and its potential to create compatibility problems.
It is not the city's intention to acquire land to be utilized as buffer areas, but rather to
encourage industries to incorporate adequate buffers into their development plans.
4. Office/Institutional/Multi-Family
Future office/institutional/multi-family (OIMF) land uses are located in areas that have already
been developed for OIMF use, are along highway corridors, or between commercial and
residential land uses. Office/institutional/multi-family uses are located in this manner to help
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan III-8 0

I
preserve the carrying capacity of transportation corridors, to serve as a buffer from the roadway,
and to minimize land use conflicts between commercial and residential land uses.
a5. CBD Mixed Use Districts
The CBD Mixed Use District land use category corresponds with the CBD area depicted on Map 3.
This district is designed to provide convenient shopping and service facilities by promoting
compact development of commercial, office, and service uses while preserving the historic
character of the district. Due to the variety of allowed uses within the CBD District land use
category, any new development or redevelopment shall be done with careful consideration given
Dto surrounding land uses. This will help keep potential land use conflicts to a minimum.
QD. SUMMARY OF GENERAL PRINCIPLES USED TO DEVELOP THE LAND USE PLAN
The City of Southport Land Use Plan was drafted with consideration given to the following:
I
I
I
I
J
it
I
► Key land use issues
► Preservation of existing urban form
► Existing plans for the development of public facilities
► Development constraints
► Existing zoning patterns
► Desire to concentrate commercial and industrial development
► Limiting potential land use conflicts
► Preservation of existing residential neighborhoods
► Prohibition of industry within the city's planning jurisdiction.
0 City of Southport Comprehensive Plan III-9

I
I
o A.
INTRODUCTION
SECTION IV: URBAN FORM POLICIES
aThe Coastal Resources Commission requires all governments to specify stated development
policies under each one of five broad topics in their Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) Land
Use Plans. These topics include:
► Resource Protection
Q Resource Production and Management
► Economic and Community Development
► Continuing Public Participation
aStorm Hazard Mitigation, Post -Disaster Recovery, and Evacuation Plans
a The 1997 City of Southport CAMA Land Use Plan includes policy statements which address these
five policy areas. The policies included in the 1997 CAMA Land Use Plan will continue to serve
as the primary guide for regulating development within the City of Southport's planning
(? jurisdiction. However, the policies included in the 1997 CAMA Land Use Plan do not address
�J urban form. Following are additional growth and development policies which relate to urban
form. Through the implementation of these policies, the city may preserve the assets which
make Southport a special place to live, while at the same time developing into the city it wishes
to become.
B. URBAN FORM GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT POLICIES
1. Districts
► Development within each of the city's districts shall be consistent with surrounding land
Q uses.
► Future development of the city's Central Business and Historic District will be regulated
D through the City of Southport Unified Development Ordinance.
► The city's existing residential districts shall be preserved and protected from encroaching
development.
► In -fill development should be encouraged within each of the city's districts to promote
the efficient use of land and cost effectiveness.
Special attention shall be given to development along the edges of districts to prevent
Opotential land use conflicts with adjacent districts and land uses.
► Uses. generating significant employment shall be concentrated for the cost effective
provision of services and to provide opportunities for ride sharing.
► The City of Southport supports the interconnectivity of subdivisions through the
enforcement of street design standards contained in the city's subdivision ordinance.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan IV-1

2. Paths (Natural and Transportation)
Natural:
► Watercourses, floodways, and undisturbed floodplains shall be preserved as conservation
areas.
► The city shall encourage developers to participate in the reservation/dedication of land
for development of a greenway system for the city, which would provide a continuous
system of open spaces which provide pedestrian links between districts and nodes.
Transportation:
► Major thoroughfares shall have an attractive appearance and reflect an overall character
or design. The city may pursue the planting of street trees along its gateway
transportation paths (NC 211 and NC 133).
► Where feasible, major thoroughfares shall have wider outside lanes for safe travel of
bicycles.
► Curb -cuts (points of ingress and egress) shall be limited along major traffic arteries to
preserve their carrying capacity.
► Transportation paths which radiate from the center of the city shall be the most intensely
developed. New cross -city connecting transportation paths shall link these radial roads
to resemble a gridiron street pattern.
► The City of Southport encourages neighborhood interconnectivity to promote the optimal
use of its transportation network.
3. Nodes
► Commercial development shall be located in nodes usually where two or more paths
intersect.
► Commercial nodes should be buffered from surrounding development with Office/
Institutional/Multi-family land uses or Open Space.
► Pedestrian connections shalt be developed between sites within all nodes.
► Commercial nodes shall be compatible in size and scale with surrounding development.
► Shared vehicular access between adjacent commercial businesses shall be encouraged.
► Nodes shall be located no closer than one mile from surrounding commercial nodes.
4. Landmarks
► The City of Southport supports the preservation and enhancement of its historically
significant landmarks.
► The city will discourage projects and activities that detract from the character of historic
resources.
► Historic landmarks will be protected through enforcement of the city's Historic District
Design Guidelines/Regulations.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan IV-2 0

5. Edges
► Edges shall serve as transition areas between varying districts.
► Edges of commercial and industrial districts shall be buffered by Office/
Institutional/Multi-family or Open Space land uses.
► Edges located along transportation paths shall be developed with Office/
Institutional/Multi-family land uses.
► Public access shall be preserved along the city's most defined edge formed by the
Intracoastal Waterway.
► "Leap -frog" development shall be discouraged and in -fill development encouraged. This
will create a more clearly defined edge between urban and rural areas, provide for
efficient use of real estate, and be less costly to serve with municipal services.
As previously discussed, the city's primary growth and development policies are included in the
1997 City of Southport CAMA Land Use Plan, Section IV, pages 1-17. These policies have been
provided in Appendix III.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan IV-3

I
I
o A.
SECTION V: IMPLEMENTATION ELEMENTS
PLAN DEVELOPMENT
aThe preparation and implementation of this plan is very important to the City of Southport.
Although the population forecasts for the city do not indicate extremely high population growth,
non-residential land uses, primarily. commercial, have been increasing very rapidly. As previously
discussed in this plan, Southport's greatest challenge during the next five years may be providing
for quality commercial development, in an appropriate amount and in the right locations. The
Oimplementation of this plan is critical to address this challenge.
At the outset of the planning process used to prepare this plan, three separate ad hoc
Dcommittees were appointed to address: Housing/Parks and Recreation, Major Streets/Public
Services, and Central Business District/Historic District (the committee members are identified
on page 1-1). Each committee met on at least three occasions to discuss a list of questions that
was provided to each committee relevant to their subject matter. At the conclusion of each
committee's analysis, all committees met jointly to report their findings to each other. The
0 consultant used the work that was completed by each committee in preparing the future land
use map and comprehensive plan report. The following provides the questions that each
committee addressed followed by their response:
D1. Housin /Parks and Recreation Committee
OWhere should additional housing be located?
0. Low to moderate density housing west of corporate limit line between Robert Ruark Drive
and Indigo Plantation.
What types of housing (i.e., single-family, multi -family, patio homes, condominiums, etc.) should
be located in Southport?
Allow cluster development and flag lots.
What housing needs are not being met?
► Need multi -family.
► Need condominiums, rental apartments.
► First-time homebuyer housing.
OWhat housing is available to newly wed/young people?
0. Very limited entry level housing.
What housing problems/deficiencies exist?
► Need stringent guidelines for commercial development in residential areas.
11
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan V-1
0

► Require interconnection of subdivision street systems.
► Subdivisions should:
1. Protect natural areas
2. Protect open space
3. Promote grid street systems
► Support commercial/residential mixed use as follows:
1. Commercial development into residential areas
2. Cottage type industries
3. Limited interior compatible commercial areas
4.
► Redevelop Jabbertown Road residential area.
Is Southport's housing affordable?
I. Moderate and LMI income affordability problem.
Is housing available for retirees and senior citizens?
0. Shortage exists for LMI and moderate income.
Is substandard housing a problem?
► Yes, but improving because of rehabilitation.
What recreational needs are not being met?
► Provide more open space and protection of fragile areas in residential subdivisions.
► Provide more parks in residential subdivisions.
What are Southport's future recreational needs?
Apply National Parks and Facilities Standards.
What, if any, recreational facilities/services should be provided in residential areas?
Apply National Parks and Facilities Standards.
Specifically, where (location) and what recreational facilities should be located in Southport?
► Park at Walden Creek with boat landing and other facilities.
► Possibly nature walk along Prices Creek.
► Apply National Parks and Facilities Standards.
2. Major Streets/Public Services Committee
What are the existing street deficiencies in Southport?
► Need for minor street resurfacing. Areas identified in the Pavement Condition Survey H
included in workbook.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan V-2 0

I
I
I
I
0
I
I
i
I
I
Where should street improvements occur?
► Howe Street. However, the city should investigate alternatives to reconfiguring Howe
Street to four lanes. One potential solution was the elimination of on -street parking
which would allow for four lanes without widening.
► The following unpaved roads: Far west side of West 111h Street and West 91h Street, part
of St. George Street, and West Leonard Street.
► Maintenance of private street at corner of Yaupon Avenue and Holly Drive. There is no
homeowner's association, it is outside city limits and no one will accept maintenance
responsibilities.
Where should major and minor thoroughfare construction occur?
► Construct a new street where Yaupon Avenue right-of-way has been provided between
E. Moore Street and E. Leonard Street.
► Consistent with adopted Thoroughfare Plan.
► Should also examine the feasibility of connecting Cottage Lane where Elementary School
is to NC 211 /133 intersection.
Are there off-street parking needs in Southport?
► For the most part, there are no off-street parking needs. However, there are a few days
during the year when parking is a problem downtown. Concern was expressed over
existing parking areas being lost to development. The burden to provide parking should
be on the developers and not the city's taxpayers.
Are there any areas of Southport which should not be disrupted by the construction of new
streets?
► Extension of E. River Drive should only be allowed if additional connections are made to
E. Moore Street.
► Minimize street construction in fragile areas.
► Consider storm surge inundation when designing street system.
► South of Smithville Woods which is primarily a residential area.
What. areas of Southport suffer from poor access?
► Undeveloped area south of Robert Ruark Drive.
► One way in and one way out of the city.
What are the existing infrastructure deficiencies/problems/needs?
► Sources of funding for improving public services.
► Pursue annexation of property to assist in funding infrastructure improvements.
Properties receiving city water and/or sewer service should be targeted first.
► Develop a back-up plan to rehabilitate the waste water treatment plant in case county-
wide sewer fails.
► Encourage pervious surfaces in parking areas to control runoff.
► Replacement of aging water lines.
► Traffic.
it
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan V-3

I
► Need to make a decision between aggressive growth and steady growth.
► Need for a second elevated storage tank.
► Need for a third groundwater well.
► Reduce inflow/infiltration into sewer collection system.
► Improve/update lift stations for sewer.
► Street resurfacing.
► Storm drain improvements. The committee specifically discussed the flooding at the
corner of Leonard and Jabbertown and on Robert Ruark behind Famous Subs.
► Require additional right-of-way setbacks for future thoroughfare construction.
► Eliminate RA-20 zoning between NC 133 and NC 211 south of CPftL Canal.
► Need to clean out Price's and Bonnet's Creek. Also, the culvert under Moore Street for
Bonnet's Creek is collapsing.
► Review parking requirements in C-1 and C-2 zoning districts.
► Conduct a parking study downtown.
► Adopt a stormwater management ordinance.
► Actively pursue grant funds to assist in infrastructure improvements.
► In the event buildings are destroyed by a catastrophic storm, Southport would support
participation in the FEMA "buy-out" program.
What are the anticipated future infrastructure deficiencies?
► Need for a regional sewer system.
► Expand the city's tax base through annexation, increase tax base to improve
infrastructure.
► Need for a regional water system.
► Expand sewer collection system.
► Placement of electrical distribution system underground.
► Additional right-of-way setbacks for new streets or expansion of existing streets.
What areas (geographic) are deficient in infrastructure services?
► MF area west of Burrington between W. Owens Street and W. Brown Street may have
sewer service deficiencies.
3. Central Business District/Historic District Committee
What development(s) or actions are threatening the Central Business District and/or Historic
District?
► Potential demolition of historically significant structures.
► Encroachment of private uses on city owned right-of-way.
► "Big box" retail development.
► Construction of "out -of -character" buildings within the district that detract from the
area.
What are the Central Business District strengths?
► Waterfront.
it
F1
0
I
0
I
I
II
0
I
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan V-4 0

I
0 0. Oak trees.
►
Atmosphere (small town feel, relaxed and laid back).
Walkable.
a
►
Many of the buildings have some character.
►
Friendliness of shop owners.
aWhat
are the Historic District strengths?
►
►
Waterfront.
Oak trees.
►
Atmosphere.
National Register status.
D
►
Majority of structures and properties have character.
►
Style and variety of houses, small lots, and closeness to street.
j�
Walkable because of the close proximity of homes, businesses, banks, bakery and other
�j
services.
0
Specifically, what, if any, improvements are needed in the Central Business District?
►
Need for additional lighting.
►
►
Encourage business owners to extend their operating hours during the summer.
Encourage the Visitor's Center to extend its operating hours during the summer.
►
Extend Riverwatk east of the City Pier and adequately maintain it (signage and walkway
o
stripe).
►
Improve the appearance of the pump station that is located downtown and provide public
restroom facilities. Special consideration should be given to the location of C-1 zoning
(�
and permitted uses.
u
Conduct a complete review and update of the city's land use related ordinances.
►
Consider reducing the extent of the area zoned for Central Business District (C-1).
QImprove
off-street and on -street parking requirements and control the encroachment of
private uses (landscaping, gardens, etc.) on city -owned right-of-way.
►
Ensure that mixed uses are 411owed in the CBD and encourage alternative uses to help
preserve historically significant structures.
►
Examine the potential for the provision of parking on portions of residential lots
D
downtown.
►
Investigate the feasibility of additional boat docking facilities on the city's waterfront.
►
Continue to encourage general public use of the marina.
O
Promotion of the waterfront as an asset of the city.
►
Encourage businesses that promote the waterfront.
aNeed
►
Examine future need for underground utilities.
for attractive and consistent signage. Signage should be added indicating the
locations of parking.
►
Encourage day -light hour special events (antique shows, plays, etc.).
►
Encourage the planting of flowers. Approach the Downtown Merchants Association,
Garden Club, and Beautification Committee for assistance.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan V-5

► Encourage the construction of buildings that are compatible with or enhance the charm
of the existing buildings in the district.
► Prohibit the use of more modern or contemporary building styles.
Specifically, what, if any, improvements are needed in the Historic District?
The focus in the Historic District should be more on improvement through preservation.
However, the following improvements have been identified:
► Additional areas for parking.
► Encourage facade improvements.
► Need for public restroom facilities.
► Need to implement recommendations included in the American Institute of Architects
study completed for Southport.
► Need for attractive and consistent signage. Signage should be added indicating the
locations of parking.
► Need for additional lighting.
What, if any, actions (public and/or private sector) are needed to protect the Historic District?
► Consider the establishment of a Historic Preservation Commission or the viability of
alternatives.
► Consider establishing a Landscape or Tree Ordinance to preserve trees, encourage new
planting and preserve vistas. Need to ensure the growth of a tree canopy over the streets
in the district.
► Conduct an inventory of historically significant structures and other significant features.
► Discourage the demolition of historic structures.
► Encourage alternative uses to help preserve historically significant structures.
► Conduct a complete review and update of the city's land use related ordinances.
► Prohibit the use of more modern or contemporary building styles.
B. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
It is apparent that all three of the committees that worked on this Comprehensive Plan share the
common goal of preserving the city's atmosphere and "small-town" character. In order to
achieve the committee's recommendations included in their reports and effectively support this
Comprehensive Plan, numerous specific implementing actions must occur. These are specified
separately by the categories of Housing/Parks and Recreation, Major Streets/Public Facilities,
and Central Business District/Historic District.
1. Housing/Parks and Recreation Committee
Objectives:
► To encourage low to moderate density housing west of the city's corporate limit line
between Robert Ruark Drive and Indigo Plantation.
To allow for cluster development and, in some cases, flag lots.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan V-6

I
I
I
I
0
I
0
I
I
► To encourage a variety of housing choices including multi -family, first-time homebuyer
housing, and housing for low -moderate and moderate incomes.
► To encourage the interconnection of subdivisions and a grid street system.
► To encourage the provision of recreational facilities in the city's planning jurisdiction and
provide more open space in residential subdivisions.
I. To provide a diversity of recreational experiences to all residents.
P. To discourage land uses which conflict with adjacent residential areas.
► To encourage in -fill development.
► To encourage residential development which is compatible with existing development in
scale and design.
Action #1: Adopt new zoning and subdivision regulations
Although this action is relevant to all three committee categories, it has been listed under
housing because housing will likely have the greatest impact on in -fill development. When the
zoning and subdivision regulations are rewritten, they should be incorporated into a Unified
Development Ordinance (UDO). The Unified Development Ordinance would incorporate all of the
city's land use related ordinances into one document.
The preparation of the UDO shall support the following strategies, reduce obstacles to sound
development, and provide attainable solutions as follows:
Strategy Obstacle Solution
Efficient Use of Land Resources
Small -lot in -fill development Excessive lot area dimensions Revise setback requirements;
ominimum lot sizes
I
0
7
N
In -fill development on large lots Inflexible subdivision and lot Average lot size for whole
area requirements
development, allow flexibility
to preserve natural features
Coordinated development Coordinated development not
Specific development plans;
addressed
master plans
Better use of deep lots Excessive frontage and multiple
Midblock lanes; interior block
access requirements
cluster development, flag lots
Less land for streets Excessive street design
Adopt "skinny" street standards
standards
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan V-7
0

Strategy Obstacle Solution
More efficient use of parking Excessive parking requirements Reduce minimum parking
areas ratios; set parking ratio
maximums; acknowledge on -
street parking; encourage
shared parking
Full Use of Urban Services
Achieving planned densities Underbuilding; no support for Minimum density standards
density goals
Attached units
Attached units
Lot sizes not in proportion to
unit sizes
Lot -area dimension
requirements (excessive side
setbacks)
Reduce lot -size requirements;
allow single-family attached in
all residential zones
Revise setback requirements
Accessory units Excessive minimum unit size; Allow accessory units
density maximums too low
Mixed Use
Mixed -use buildings Single -use zoning; separation of Allow home occupations and
uses live/work units; density bonus
for mixed -use commercial/
residential buildings
Mixed -use neighborhoods
Healthy commercial districts
Single -use zoning; separation of
uses
Separation of uses; proximity
Limited commercial in
residential zones; allow multi-
family residential in
commercial zones; limited
retail in industrial zones
Community shopping centers
with street connectivity; main
street districts
Transportation Options
Multi -modal streets Street design standards over- Revise street standards;
emphasize autos promote "skinny" streets
Transit, bikes, and pedestrian Physical barriers or out -of -
connectivity direction travel
Transit -supportive development Transit -supportive development
not addressed
Cul-de-sac and block -length
a
maximums; internal
connectivity standards;
sidewalk requirements
n
Mandate transit -oriented
(�
development along transit
corridor
a
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan V-8 0

I
0
I
I
it
I
Strategy Obstacle Solution
Detailed, Human -Scale Design
Compatibly designed buildings Too abrupt transitions between
zones
Compatibly designed buildings
Pedestrian -friendly
streetscapes (commercial)
Pedestrian -friendly
streetscapes (residential)
Quality architectural design
Implementation
Examining the development
review process
Examining the Planned Unit
Development (PUD) process
Flexibility in the design review
process
No design guidelines for new
buildings
Street standards emphasize
cars; design discourages
walking
Street standards emphasize
cars; design discourages
walking
No incentive to provide
amenities
Onerous procedures for
variances, conditional uses
No PUD requirements
Discretionary design review
process; vague standards
Density transitioning; midblock
zoning district lines; building
height limits
Incorporate compatibility
guidelines for new in -fill
construction
Building orientation; parking lot
placement; allow shared
access; 50%/80% frontage rule,
etc.
Require sidewalks; limit
setbacks; garage placement;
lighting; utility placement; etc.
Density bonuses for amenities
Allow administrative approval
for minor adjustments
Establish PUD regulations
Dual -track design review
process -
*A dual -track process allows the developer to choose from two options: (1) adherence to prescribed and
detailed specific design standards, and (2) a more flexible design review process based on performance
guidelines. This approach requires the community to create two sets of development standards. One set
of prescriptive standards is defined in terms of distances, heights, density, and other precise and
quantifiable standards that can be applied through an administrative process without public notice or
hearings. The other set of performance guidelines outlines community objectives and is more flexible and
likely to result in exciting and innovative design, but does require public notice and hearings.
The key is providing certainty and flexibility. The developer of a smaller, straightforward project can
a proceed with administrative review, provided the project meets specific standards. A more elaborate or
complex project can go before a design review board to provide the design flexibility that some developers
or architects prefer.
aThe UDO should address the following existing ordinance deficiencies or issues that are known
to exist at this time:
► The permitted uses in all of the city's zoning districts should be revised.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan V-9
0

P. Office, historic, and downtown central business districts should be established.
► The Planned Residential Development (PRD) zoning district regulation should be entirely
rewritten.
► The definition sections of the city's ordinances should be consolidated and updated, and
inconsistencies addressed.
► The city's existing sign ordinance should be reviewed to determine if it has adequately
addressed signage in Southport. If necessary, the sign ordinance should be revised.
► A landscaping section should be included in the ordinance that would address tree
protection, tree replanting, vista and open space requirements, and buffering.
► All zoning and subdivision text amendments that have occurred should be incorporated
into the UDO.
It is likely that many more problems with the city's ordinances will be identified during the initial
phases of UDO development. The above list identifies only those deficiencies that were
identified during the development of this Comprehensive Plan.
The City of Southport submitted a technical assistance grant application to the Division of Coastal
Management in April 2001, to assist in the funding of a UDO.
Action #2: Rezoning
Following the adoption of this plan, simultaneous with the preparation of a UDO, the city should
examine its existing zoning patterns for potential areas to rezone. it may be necessary for the
city to rezone some areas consistent with the future land use map included in this plan to
accomplish its goals.
It is recommended that prior to any zoning departures from the future land use map, the
Comprehensive Plan should be reviewed to determine if a change in the future land use map
should be made. Through this procedure, the impact of a change on the entire map and plan
should be considered. This process will reduce land use and zoning decisions which are made in
a vacuum and consistency of the plan and zoning ordinance (UDO) will improve.
In addition, the City of Southport Planning Board and Board of Aldermen should consider the
following during the deliberation of all zoning requests:
► All uses which are allowed in a zoning district must be considered. A decision to re -zone
or not to re -zone a parcel or parcels of property cannot be based on consideration of only
one use or a partial list of the uses allowed within a zoning district.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan V-10

I
OZoning decisions will not be based on aesthetic considerations.
a Requests for zoning changes will not be approved if the requested change will result in
spot zoning. Spot zoning is a form of discriminatory zoning whose sole purpose is to serve
the private interests of one or more landowners instead of furthering the welfare of the
U entire community as part of an overall zoning plan. Although changing the zoning
classification of any parcel of land to permit a more intensive use could possibly
constitute spot zoning, the test lies in its relationship to the existing zoning pattern and
guidelines of the local land use plan. Spot zoning is based on the arbitrary and
inappropriate nature of a re -zoning change rather than, as is commonly believed, in the
size of the area being re -zoned.
► Zoning which will result in strip development will be discouraged. Strip development is
a melange of development, usually commercial, extending along both sides of a major
street. Strip development is often a mixture of auto -oriented enterprises (e.g., gas
stations, motels, and food stands), truck -dependent wholesale and light industrial
enterprises along with the once -rural homes and farms that await conversion to
commercial use. Strip development may severely reduce traffic -carrying capacity of
oabutting streets by allowing for excessive and conflicting curb cuts.
► The concept of uniformity will be supported in all zoning deliberations. Uniformity is a
basic premise of zoning which holds that all land in similar circumstances should be zoned
alike; any different treatment must be justified -by showing different circumstances.
aZoning regulations will be made in accordance with the City of Southport Land Use Plan
and designed to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic, and
other dangers; to promote health and the general welfare; to provide adequate light and
air; to prevent the overcrowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and
to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks,
Oand other public requirements. The regulations shall be made with reasonable
consideration, among other things, as to the character of the district and its peculiar
suitability for particular uses, and with a view to conserving the value of buildings and
encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout Southport's planning
jurisdiction.
DSpecifically, the Planning Board and Board of Aldermen should ask the following
questions:
1. Does Southport need more land in the zone class requested?
a2. is there other property in the city that might be more appropriate for this use?
a3. Is the request in accordance with the City of Southport land use plan?
0 City of Southport Comprehensive Plan V-11

4. Will the request have a serious impact on traffic circulation, parking space, sewer
and water services, and other utilities?
5. Is there a good possibility that the request, as proposed, will result in lessening
the enjoyment or use of adjacent properties?
6. Will the request, as proposed, cause serious noise, odors, light, activity, or
unusual disturbances?
7. Does the request raise serious legal questions such as spot zoning, hardship,
violation of precedents, or need for this type of use?
Action #3: In -fill Development
Southport shall develop an "incentives" plan of action to encourage in -fill development. It is a
more frugal use of resources to have developers locate adjacent to existing infrastructure as
opposed to extending utilities and other infrastructure. Incentives and the incentives plan shall
be constructed by a committee composed of city staff, planning board members, and
representatives of the development community. Possible incentives may include but not be
limited to the following:
► Reductions in water and sewer tap fees.
► Local government participation in infrastructure cost.
► Increased density allowances.
► Deferred annexation action plans.
Action #4: Street Interconnection
The City of Southport Subdivision Ordinance states the following in regard to street
interconnectivity:
'The arrangement of streets in proposed subdivisions shall make provisions for the
continuation of existing streets in adjoining areas or their proper projection where
adjoining land is not subdivided and where they may be deemed necessary for
public requirements. The street arrangement shall be such as not to cause a
hardship to owners of adjoining property when developed and when they seek to
provide for convenient access thereto. The use of residual strips of land in order
to prevent the extension of proposed or existing streets or access thereto is
prohibited."
It is important for the Planning Board and Board of Aldermen to continue the strict enforcement
of the above -stated subdivision regulation to achieve adequate street interconnectivity.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan V-12 a

OAction #5: Prepare a Parks and Recreation Master Plan
a The City of Southport should prepare a Parks and Recreation Master Plan to study in depth the
existing and future demand for recreational facilities. Specifically, the plan should address:
aIdentification of existing facilities and programs.
► Facility usage.
► Comparative analysis of existing facilities to other communities, national and state
standards.
► Future recreational facility needs.
OGeneral delineation of properties for acquisition/development.
► Priorities for facilities development.
► Funding sources.
Following the funding and completion of the city's UDO, the city could apply again to the Division
of Coastal Management for funding assistance to prepare a Parks and Recreation Master Plan.
Following the preparation of a Recreation Plan, the city should apply to the Parks and Recreation
OTrust Fund (PARTF) to assist in the funding of improvements. The PARTF provides dollar -for -
dollar matching grants to local governments for local park and recreation purposes.
2. Central Business District(CBD)/Historic District
Objectives:
► Encourage and promote a pedestrian friendly environment.
► Ensure that mixed uses are allowed in the CBD and encourage alternative uses to help
preserve historically significant structures.
► Discourage the demolition of historic structures.
a Need for attractive and consistent signage. Signage should be added indicating the
locations of parking.
Encourage businesses that promote the waterfront.
► Encourage the construction of buildings that are compatible with or enhance the charm
of the existing buildings in the district.
aAction #1: Coordinate with the North Carolina Main Street Center and pursue monies that are
available from the Main Street Financial Incentive Fund for improvements downtown
QIn 1991, the City of Southport joined the North Carolina Main Street Program. The City of
Southport and the. Downtown Merchants Association should continue to use the services of the
North Carolina Main Street Center for assistance in achieving its objectives downtown.
a
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan V-13

The North Carolina Main Street Center provides the following services:
Program Guidance The NCMSC assists communities in developing a local program to manage
the process of revitalization, and helps them to develop a vision for action.
This includes organizational development and board training as well as
assistance in the development of goals, objectives and work plans.
Technical Assistance The NCMSC provides technical assistance in the areas of organizational
development, real estate development, marketing, business recruitment,
promotions, and design, among others. The Main Street designer provides
consultation and renderings to property owners to encourage facade
renovation.
Training The NCMSC offers training workshops in the following areas: the Main
Street approach, real estate and business development, design, and
organizational development. Courses are held around the state and are
offered to Main Street and non -Main Street communities alike.
Network Through participation in the North Carolina Main Street program,
communities have access not only to other in -state programs, but also to
over 800 communities across the country that are participating in Main
Street. By sharing the lessons learned, communities can avoid many of the
pitfalls and invest their resources more wisely. The NCMSC functions as a
clearinghouse for ideas and success stories from which all can benefit.
Any North Carolina city affiliated with the North Carolina Main Street Center Program may apply
for moneys from the Main Street Financial Incentive Fund by submitting an application to the
Main Street Center in the Division of Community Assistance, Department of Commerce. Moneys
in the Main Street Financial Incentive Fund shall be used for the following eligible activities:
(1) The acquisition or rehabilitation of properties in connection with private
investment in a designated downtown area;
(2) The establishment of revolving loan programs for private investment in a
designated downtown area;
(3) The subsidization of interest rates for these revolving loan programs;
(4) The establishment of facade incentive grants in connection with private
investment in a designated downtown area;
(5) Market studies, design studies, design assistance, or strategic planning efforts,
provided the activity can be shown to lead directly to private investment in a
designated downtown area;
(6) Any approved project that provides construction or rehabilitation in a designated
downtown area and can be shown to lead directly to private investment in the
designated downtown area; and
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan V-14

I
(7) Public improvements and public infrastructure within a designated downtown
area, provided these improvements are necessary to create or stimulate private
Dinvestment in the designated downtown area.
Action #2: Implement the recommendations included in the Development Plan for the City
Qof Southport
0 This plan was completed by the Urban Design Assistance Team, North Carolina Chapter of the
American Institute of Architects in 1991 for the city's CBD and historic district. The
recommendations of this plan are as follows:
0 The owners of downtown buildings and lots need to be made aware of the original
architectural character of the block on which they are located, so future construction,
Qincluding renovations, can be more sensitive to the character of the area.
a
I
0
I
I
I
0
I
ill
► In -fill construction on the vacant lots should be encouraged in the downtown area to
increase the number or rental properties. In the interim, those lots that are used for
parking should be screened from the street with landscaping using architectural elements
like fences to provide visual continuity along the street.
► Parking should be provided either on the streets or behind the buildings using leftover
spaces and existing alleys for access.
► All new buildings should maintain the same setback from the street as adjacent structures
to maintain the street edge. Heights of new buildings should not exceed three stories.
► Display windows on the first floor should be encouraged to promote the image of shopping
downtown. .
► A sign ordinance should be established for the downtown area to encourage quality and
clarity.
► Storefront awnings should be installed to provide shade for pedestrian traffic until new
shade trees grow to fulfill that need. Canvas awnings should be appropriate for
downtown, perhaps using a roll -up style to avoid_ potential wind damage.
► As economic conditions allow, the city should encourage a general upgrading of downtown
buildings perhaps by establishing a revolving loan fund for renovations.
► Judicious planting should be undertaken in areas where it is not anticipated that a
building or lot will soon be developed.
0
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan V-15

► Zoning within the historic area should reinforce a distinction between commercial and
residential areas. Retail and professional activities should not "bleed out" into
residential areas.
► The city should promote the development of hotels, bed and breakfast inns through
appropriate zoning and using any other available incentives. Southport 2000 could
actively recruit high quality development projects and assemble parcels of land in
desirable locations for resale to prospective developers.
► A signage program should be developed and implemented in conjunction with NCDOT and
to quickly inform and orient visitors. At its most basic level, roadway signage needs to
have concise information, property sized and located to ensure a smooth traffic flow. It
should convey an image of Southport's heritage and waterfront activities, inform the
curious and spark the interest of the casual observer.
► All signage should be consistent with other graphic and printed material, both in terms
of quality of information and visual style. It should also be consistent with the best
architectural character of Southport - its waterfront and streetscape development and
its institutions.
Action #3: Amendment of the City's Zoning Ordinance
As discussed throughout this plan, the city's land use related ordinances are in need of a major
overhaul. As a result, the city will pursue the development of a Unified Development Ordinance
(UDO). When the UDO is drafted, two additional zoning districts should be added. These
districts include a downtown central business district and historic district.
In the absence of a Historic Preservation Commission and adopted design guidelines, the only
avenue the city has to protect its historic district is through zoning. Although limited in the
amount of protection this can afford, regulations specific to the downtown central business
district and historic district should be developed.
Action #4: Capital Improvements Projects in CBD/HD
The following provides a list of capital improvements projects which are needed in the Central
Business District/Historic District:
► Extend Riverwalk east of the City Pier and adequately maintain it, (signage and walkway
stripe).
► Improve the appearance of the pump station that is located downtown and provide public
restroom facilities.
► Need for additional lighting.
► Investigate the feasibility of additional boat docking facilities at the city's waterfront.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan V-16

I
0
I
► Examine the future need for underground utilities.
► Need for attractive and consistent signage. Signage should be added that indicates the
locations of available parking.
Some of these capital improvements are addressed in other sections of this plan. For example,
the Parks and Recreation Master Plan will also address the extension of Riverwalk east of the City
Pier. In addition, these improvements should be included in a capital improvements plan when
one is prepared for the City of Southport. .
Action #5: Funding Options
Securing funding is one of the most important steps to be taken to ensure implementation of this
comprehensive plan. Federal funding of extensive, multi -faceted, complex CBD projects no
longer exists. CBD efforts are forced to increasingly look at local government and private
resources as the primary sources of funding. This section will discuss the funding resources
available to Southport and its CBD businesses and residences. Some of the sources may not be
realistic options, but are an effort to define the full range of options that may be available.
a NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) is responsible for maintaining some
roads within the city's planning jurisdiction. In addition, NCDOT maintains a five-year
I
0
I
I
0
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) which prioritizes needed highway improvements.
Long-term CBD revitalization will be supported by improvement of the CBD's pedestrian
environment.
Beautification projects are also funded by the DOT. The intermodal Surface Transportation
Efficiency Act of 1991, which reauthorized federal aid for highways and public transit for fiscal
years 1992 through 1997, provided funding for "transportation enhancements." Enhancements
include the following activities:
► Scenic easements, scenic sites, scenic highway programs, landscaping and other scenic
beautification.
► Preservation of abandoned railway corridors (including conversion and use for pedestrian
or bicycle trails).
► Historic preservation; historic sites; historic highways program; rehabilitation and
operation of historic transportation buildings, structures or facilities (including historic
railroad facilities and canals).
► Pedestrian and bicycle facilities.
► Control and removal of outdoor advertising.
► Archaeological planning and research.
► Mitigation of water pollution due to highway runoff.
Enhancements in North Carolina are handled through the state's TIP process. The city will
contact the DOT and/or its DOT board member to discuss specific projects.
I
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan V-17

I
NORTH CAROLINA RURAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CENTER
The North Carolina Rural Economic Development Center has funds available for supplemental
grants and capacity grants. The available grant funds fluctuate annually. The maximum per
grant amounts are $100,000 for the supplemental program and $40,000 for the capacity grant.
The Rural Economic Development Center, as directed by the North Carolina General Assembly,
will provide supplemental grants to local governments and nonprofit corporations in economically
depressed areas of North Carolina. The center will make funds available to match federal and
other grants that support necessary economic development projects and activities in these areas.
All projects will be evaluated relative to these guidelines, and selections will be based on need.
Applicants that address local economic development concerns will be considered for funding by
the Rural Center. Projects should have identified their primary funding sources, and address one
of the following program areas:
Community Development - which includes infrastructure facilities, industrial site development,
commercial revitalization, and housing;
Human Resources Development - which includes workforce training and education; or
Business Development - which includes research, technical assistance, and enterprise sites.
Projects that improve water and sewer systems, upgrade training of the workforce, or aid in job
creation efforts will be given priority.
The purpose of the capacity grants is to enable local governments to acquire short-term capacity
for the planning and writing of federal grants that address immediate economic development
needs. Applicants will be evaluated relative to the established guidelines, and selections will be
based on need.
Applicants that have identified immediate economic development needs and can establish a need
for financial assistance will be considered for funding. In general, established economic
development needs will relate to one of the following program areas:
Community Development - which includes infrastructure facilities, industrial site development,
commercial revitalization, and housing;
Human Resources Development - which includes workforce training and education; or
Business Development - which includes research, technical assistance, and enterprise sites.
Applicants that target an immediate need to improve water or sewer systems, upgrade the
training of the workforce, or aid in job creation efforts will be given priority.
0
11
�J
I
I
0
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan V-18 0

0
I
I
I
I
I
11
I
I
I
PRIVATE FUNDS
The City of Southport needs to stimulate the investment of private funds in the CBD/HD. A low
interest loan pool may be established by the local banks to provide a source of loan funds
available at the prime interest rate. The following provides a general description of a possible
low interest loan program. The specific details would have to be resolved with the participating
banks.
Available Funds
The banks, if participating, will have to define the
amount of available funds.
Loan Amounts
It is recommended that the maximum loan amount
for any one loan be the amount of money in the
pool. In addition, it is recommended that the
minimum loan amount be set at $15,000.
Interest Rate
The interest rate on each loan shall be the prime
rate as reported in the Wall Street Journal, as that
rate may change from time to time, adjusted on
the date of each such change, and calculated on
the outstanding principal balance on the basis of
the actual number of days elapsed over a 360-day
year.
Applications must include:
• complete description of work to be paid for with
Loan proceeds • cost estimates • plans and
specifications in form and detail sufficient for
building permit review, prepared by a qualified
builder or design professional • an appraisal
estimating value of property when improved
according to project description, plans and
specifications • financial statements and credit
information normally required to obtain a
commercial real estate mortgage loan • copies
of any existing mortgages, deeds of trust or other
documents evidencing a financial lien or
encumbrance on the property, together with a
statement of outstanding balances of such
encumbrances.
Initial review of all applications will be made by
the City of Southport to assure that the project is
in the Southport CBD/ HD, and that it complies with
the City of Southport zoning ordinance and all
other local, state and federal statutes. After these
determinations have been made, the City of
Southport shall certify to the lead bank that the
applicant is eligible to apply for a loan from the
pool.
Origination Fee
The borrower will pay an origination fee of
(to be set by the banks) and other customary and
normal charges of securing a commercial loan.
The fee will be paid to ,
which has agreed to be the lead bank and servicing
agent for the loan pool.
Loan Term
The principal amount of each loan shall be payable
to the servicing agent in equal monthly
installments calculated pursuant to an
amortization schedule of 15 years or less, as
deemed appropriate by the loan committee.
Applying for a Loan
Any of the participating banks will accept
applications. All applications will be processed by
the servicing agent.
Loan Committee
All decisions with respect to loans shall be made
by the loan committee composed of one
representative from each participating lender. All
actions of the loan committee require a unanimous
vote of all loan committee members. If the loan
committee approves a loan, the servicing agency
shall issue a commitment to the borrower stating
the terms and conditions of the loan. The
commitment will be open for 30 days.
Use of Loan Proceeds
Permitted expenditures are costs properly incurred
by the borrower after the issuance of a formal
commitment for a loan for the acquisition,
construction, repair, enlargement, reconstruction,
reconditioning or rehabilitation of a "qualifying
property" meeting loan commitment criteria and
located in the Southport CBD/HD. Specific
permitted expenditures will include land, existing
buildings, labor and materials; architectural,
engineering and legal services, including surveys,
estimates, plans and specifications, and
supervision; bonds, permits and closing costs;
interest incurred and paid during the period of
construction or rehabilitation; landscaping.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan V-19

I
CITY OF SOUTHPORT LOCAL TAX REVENUES
The City of Southport may utilize local tax revenues for a wide range of CBD/HD improvements,
including grants to individuals for the improvement of private properties. Some communities
have established facade incentive grant programs which provide local tax revenues as an
incentive to encourage property owners to undertake building improvements. The following
provides the details of an example facade improvement program.
Purpose: Provide an economic incentive to:
1. Renovate store facades in Southport's CBD.
2. Encourage appropriate design projects which capitalize on the rehabilitation of existing properties
paired with the introduction of compatible new design.
3. Preserve unique historic character.
Eli0bility:
Any owner or tenant of a building, excluding those occupying tax exempt properties, located within
the City of Southport CBD/HD.
2. Owners and tenants may request incentive grants separately; however, any tenant must have the
owners written permission attached to the application.
3. The City of Southport may award a second facade incentive grant if:
(a) at least five years have elapsed since the first grant was awarded and the facade is in need
of further improvement (i.e., repaint, new awning);
(b) the existing business undergoes significant expansion which requires improvement to the
facade (i.e., window replacement on upper stories); or
(c) a new business moves in and requires changes in the building's facade (i.e., new sign, new
awning).
Guidelines:
1. The Secretary of the Interior's standards for rehabilitation will be used as guidelines in making
improvements to the facade of the structure. Southport will furnish these guidelines to all
qualified recipients.
2. Rehabilitation of qualified structures will be considered a contemporary solution which respects
the architectural integrity of the entire building front, retaining those elements that enhance the
aesthetic quality of the building.
3. Alt rehabilitation design proposals wilt meet all applicable building codes.
4. Any exterior renovation proposal, from an entire facade rehabilitation to replacement of an
inappropriate sign, is eligible for funding, but top priority will be given to projects which will make
a highly visible contribution to the commercial district.
I
I
I
I
I
I
V
I
0
111
i
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan V-20 0

I
QCriteria: Grants are given on a matching basis with a maximum participation of (to be determined) per
facade project as determined by the city.
QSource —of Funds:.. The Southport CBD/HD matching incentive grants are made possible through an
appropriation by the Southport Board of Aldermen.
0 Process for Receiving Grant:
1. A conference between the recipient and the City of Southport is required during which the
(� recipient shall present a project proposal to the city. The city will distribute grant application
(� forms at the conclusion of this initial conference if the recipient's proposal is within program
guidelines.
2. The owner/tenant must complete application, including design plans or sketches and owners
permission if necessary, and return to the City of Southport.
U 3. Design plans and sketches must be approved by the City of Southport.
4. Within thirty (30) days after submission of an application, a notification letter will be sent to each
D applicant indicating whether the project has been accepted as described in the application,
accepted with conditions, or rejected.
G 5. A facade agreement must be signed by the recipient prior to commencement of work on the
project. Parties to the agreement will be the applicant and the city.
6. Upon project cancellation, copies of paid invoices and/or canceled checks must be sent to the City
of Southport.
7. The City of Southport shall inspect completed work and issue a grant check upon completion of all
work.
O 8. The project must be completed within six months after applicant has been notified of the grant
approval.
Because of limited fiscal resources, the City of Southport will have to prioritize its commitment
of local tax dollars to CBD improvements. This prioritization shall be accomplished in close
coordination with both CBD/HD businesses and property owners. A five-year program of CBD/HD
improvement will be adopted. This funding schedule will be updated each year with a new fifth
year added. Even if funding is limited, some improvements will be made each year. Progress,
albeit slow, will be accomplished each year.
DRURAL TOURISM DEVELOPMENT GRANTS
Rural Tourism Development grants are available through the North Carolina Department of
Commerce. Funding varies from year to year depending upon the state budget allocation. in
addition, specific program guidelines are subject to change annually. The following provides a
summary of the fiscal year 1994-95 program:
1) Description of the Program - The Rural Tourism Development Grant Program was created by the North
DCarolina General Assembly to enhance economic growth through tourism development in the rural areas
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan V-21
D

I
of the state. The program for fiscal year 1994-95 consisted of a $400,000 fund intended "... to encourage
the development of new tourism projects and activities in rural areas of the state." For the purpose of this
program, the Travel and Tourism Division has adopted the definition of "Rural" established by North
Carolina's Rural Economic Development Center, specifically those counties having population densities of
less than 200 persons per square mile. This includes 85 North Carolina counties, but specifically does not
include Cumberland, Gaston, Davidson, New Hanover, Guilford, Buncombe, Alamance, Rowan, Cabarrus,
Catawba, Forsyth, Mecklenburg, Durham, Orange, and Wake. Additional consideration is given to more
economically distressed rural counties. Proposed projects shall be of a durable and lasting nature, visible
in the community to inspire others to succeed, and capable of generating measurable, verifiable, long-term
economic growth through increased tourism.
2) Purpose - The Rural Tourism Development Grant Program is designed to:
► Encourage the initiation and implementation of creative new tourism -related projects and
activities having the capacity to enhance long-term economic growth in North Carolina's rural areas
through increased travel activity;
► Encourage the implementation of cooperative regional tourism development projects and
activities, not exclusive of efforts within individual communities or among communities within a
given rural county;
► Provide funds through grants to destination marketing and non-profit organizations for the
development and recruitment of tourism businesses and attractions;
► Foster the development and growth of regional tourism marketing and development organizations
in rural areas of the state;
► Leverage funds from non -state sources for tourism development projects and activities.
3) Eligibility - Any statutorily empowered tourism marketing/development agency, or legally chartered
non-profit North Carolina organization in a designated rural county that includes tourism marketing and/or
development among its major activities, may apply for funds under this program. Documentation of legal
status, tax exemption, and a federal identification number is required with the application.
4) Maximum Grant Amount - No recipient or new tourism project received a total of more than $25,000
of these grant funds for the 1994-95 fiscal year.
5) Matching Formulae - The matching formulae favors economic growth in the less affluent areas of our
state. Ranked on the basis of lowest per capita income, slowest population growth, and highest
unemployment, organizations in counties 1 through 20 will be required to provide one non -state dollar for
every four state dollars awarded. Those in counties 21-50 must provide one non -state dollar for every three
state dollars, and in counties 51-85, one non -state dollar will be required for each dollar received from the
state.
6) Appropriate Uses of Grant Funds - Appropriate projects for which grant funds might be used include:
► Research - marketing and other types of necessary research or studies upon which to base a long-
range, tourism -based economic development plan;
► Planning - needs assessment and implementation of a long-range, tourism -based economic
development plan;
► Capital Projects - equipment purchase, renovation or construction of facilities. Capital uses are
only permitted in support of program development, and expenditures for office equipment may not
exceed 25% of the total grant awarded;
► Training - development and presentation of hospitality, management, marketing, and/or other
types of tourism training programs to enhance long-term economic growth by improving a
community's competitive position;
0
I
I I
0
I
0
0
I
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan V-22

I
I
I
I
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
► Technical Assistance/Contractual Services - services provided by outside vendors under contract
that will result in enhanced long-term economic growth and the creation of new jobs.
LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND
The Land and Water Conservation Fund is administered for the U.S. Department of Interior
through the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and
Recreation. This program makes funds available to local governments on a matching basis for
Land acquisition and recreation facility improvements. This program has provided numerous
grants over the past years, but the amount of funds available is limited and thus grant
applications are very competitive. Grants have normally ranged from $35,000 to $75,000.
CLEAN WATER MANAGEMENT TRUST FUND (CWMTF)
Any of the following are eligible to receive a grant from CWMTF for the purpose of protecting or
enhancing water quality:
1. A State agency.
2. A local government or other political subdivision of the state or a combination of such
entities.
3. A non-profit corporation whose primary purpose is the conservation, preservation, and
restoration of our State's environmental and natural resources.
No match is required; however, Trustees may choose to fund projects at less than 100% of the
application request.
Grant monies from CWMTF may be used for any of the following purposes:
1. Acquire land for riparian buffers for environmental protection of surface waters or urban
drinking water supplies, or for establishing a network of greenways for environmental,
education, or recreational uses.
2. Acquire easements in order to protect surface waters or urban drinking water supplies.
3. Coordinate with other public programs involved with lands adjoining water bodies to gain
the most public benefit while protecting and improving water quality.
4. Restore degraded lands for their ability to protect water quality.
5. Repair failing waste treatment systems: if (a) an application to the Clean Water Revolving
Loan and Grant Fund has been submitted and denied in the latest review cycle; (b) repair
is for a reasonable remedy to an existing waste treatment problem; and (c) the repair is
not for the purpose of expanding the system to accommodate future anticipated growth
of a community. Priority shall be given to economically distressed units of local
government.
6. Repair/eliminate failing septic tank systems, to eliminate illegal drainage connections,
and to expand waste treatment systems if the system is being expanded as a remedy to
eliminate failing septic tank systems or illegal drainage connections. Priority shall be
given to economically distressed units of local government.
I
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan V-23

I
7. Improve stormwater controls and management.
8. Facilitate planning that targets reductions in surface water pollution.
PARKS AND RECREATION TRUST FUND PARTF)
In 1993, the General Assembly established PARTF to provide funding for the state parks system,
local park and recreation projects, and coastal beach/estuarine access projects. The Parks and
Recreation Authority directs expenditure of the funds.
Thirty percent of the trust fund is used for matching grants to local governments for public park
and recreation development, renovation, and/or land acquisition. Counties and incorporated
municipalities are the only eligible applicants and must possess long-term control of the subject
property. School administrative units may jointly apply with either an incorporated city or
county.
Approximately $6 million will be available for local projects during fiscal year 1998-1999, with
$250,000 maximum on individual grants. Applicants must make a dollar -for -dollar commitment
of local revenue to match state funds received under the program.
3. Major Streets/Public Services
Objectives:
► To ensure safe, livable neighborhoods.
► To plan, provide, and maintain facilities adequate for continuing growth.
► To reduce existing traffic congestion and safety problems.
► To ensure that new development enhances, not worsens, the city's transportation system.
► To provide adequate roads to service future development.
► To provide a pedestrian friendly environment.
► To provide infrastructure which will support economic growth and development.
Action #1: Capital Improvements Plan
The City of Southport will secure funding for development of a detailed capital improvements
plan. Capital improvements planning or programming is the multi -year scheduling of public
physical improvements. The scheduling is based on studies of fiscal resources available and the
choice of specific improvements to be constructed for a period of five years into the future. The
capital improvements budget refers to those facilities that are programmed for the next fiscal
year. A capital improvements plan/program refers to the improvements that are scheduled in
the succeeding four- or five-year period. An important distinction between the capital budget
and the capital improvements plan/program is that the one-year budget may become a part of
the legally adopted annual operating budget, whereas the longer -term program does not
necessarily have legal significance, nor does it necessarily commit a government to a particular
expenditure in a particular year.
0
0
0
I
I
I
I
is
I
I
I
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan V-24

I
QThus, the plan shall, at a minimum, address the following Major Streets/Public Services
Committee recommendations for priorities one and two.
OPriority #1: What are the existing infrastructure deficiencies/problems/needs?
► Develop a back-up plan to rehabilitate the waste water treatment plant in case county-
wide sewer fails.
► Replacement of aging water lines.
► Need for a second elevated storage tank.
U Need for a third groundwater well.
► Reduce inflow/infiltration into sewer collection system.
O Improve/update lift stations for sewer.
► Street resurfacing.
► Storm drain improvements. Specifically, the flooding at the corner of Leonard and
OJabbertown and on Robert Ruark behind Famous Subs.
► Need to clean out Price's and Bonnet's Creek. Also, the culvert under Moore Street for
o Bonnet's Creek is collapsing.
► Conduct a parking study downtown.
O Priority #2: What are the anticipated future infrastructure deficiencies?
► Need for a regional sewer system.
► Need for a regional water system.
DExpand sewer collection system.
► Placement of electrical distribution system underground.
aAction #2: Implementation of Thoroughfare Plan
O In 2000, the City of Southport adopted a thoroughfare plan that was prepared for the city by the
North Carolina Department of Transportation. The primary objective of the Thoroughfare Plan
is to guide the development of the urban street system in a manner consistent with changing
ntraffic patterns. The following provides a summary of recommended improvements included in
u the Thoroughfare Plan:
I
0
0
► NC 211 from Beach Road to Fodale Avenue: Widen roadway to a 4-lane median divided
facility.
► North Connector: Construct a 2-lane road on new location from Leonard Street to NC 87.
► Yaupon Avenue: Construct a 2-lane road on new location utilizing existing donated right-
of-way.
► NC 211 (Howe Street): Widen existing roadway to four lanes.
► NC 87/NC 133: Widen existing roadway to a 5-lane divided facility.
► Dosher Cut -Off Road: Continue to support TIP project R-3324 providing a new connector
from NC 87/NC 133 directly to Beach Road.
I
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan V-25

Map 16 provides the location of proposed thoroughfares in the Southport area. The City of
Southport should work towards the implementation of its thoroughfare plan. in addition, now
that the city has prepared a Comprehensive Plan, the city should revisit its adopted thoroughfare
plan and consider revising it to include the following improvements that were identified by the
Major Streets/Public Services Committee:
Priority #3: What are the existing street deficiencies and where should major and minor
thoroughfare improvements occur?
► Need for minor street resurfacing (see Map 14 for an identification of streets that require
resurfacing).
► Howe Street. However, the city should investigate alternatives to reconfiguring Howe
Street to four lanes. One potential solution was the elimination of on -street parking
which would allow for four lanes without widening.
► Paving of the following unpaved roads: Far west side of West 11`h Street and West 9ch
Street, part of St. George Street, and West Leonard Street.
► Construct a new street where Yaupon Avenue right-of-way has been provided between
E. Moore Street and E. Leonard Street.
► Should also examine the feasibility of connecting Cottage Lane where Elementary School
is to NC 211 /133 intersection.
Action #3: Annexation
The Major Streets/Public Services Committee identified and recommended annexation as a means
by which to fund public facility improvements. Following completion of the annexation study
that is being conducted by the North Carolina Division of Community Assistance, the city should
examine the cost/revenue of annexation. Annexation that is cost effective will be aggressively
pursued.
Action #4: Need for Sidewalks
Prior to any consideration for funding of sidewalks by the North Carolina Department of
Transportation, it is required that a municipality has a comprehensive plan which addresses the
desirability of and need for sidewalks. The comprehensive plan does address the need for
sidewalks. However, additional study is required to determine the specific locations where
sidewalks are needed.
Following the determination of specific sidewalk locations, an application for sidewalk funding
shall be prepared and submitted to the North Carolina Department of Transportation. However,
the reader is cautioned that state funds vary from fiscal year and are limited. Heavy
public/private funding for sidewalks may be required.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan V-26 0

I
I
I
I
c
I
I
I
r
1�1
SECTION VI: CONCLUSION
Simply planning for the future of Southport is not enough to achieve the city's goals and visions
that it has for itself. However, the completion of this plan is the first step towards this end. The
city's staff, Planning Board, and Board of Aldermen must now work towards plan implementation.
It should also be noted that a Comprehensive Plan is not intended to be a static document. It
should remain a work in progress and be reviewed at least once every five years and amended
as necessary.
City of Southport Comprehensive Plan VI-1
O

I
C
I
I
G
0
I
I
I
ill
I
ail
I
APPENDIX I
CITY OF SOUTHPORT
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
PREPARATION OF A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The City of Southport has received a Division of Coastal Management Technical Assistance Grant for
the preparation of a Comprehensive Plan. Adequate citizen participation in the development of the
plan is essential to the preparation of a document responsive to the needs of the citizens of
Southport. To ensure such input, the following citizen participation program will be utilized by the
city:
The Southport Planning Board will work with the city's planning consultant to ensure that the final
product identifies present demographic, economic, and housing conditions, existing land use,
development constraints/stimulants, future land use, land use policies, and implementing strategies.
Specifically, the planning consultant and the Planning Board will be responsible for ensuring
accomplishment of the following:
• Provision of adequate opportunities for citizen participation: 1 start-up public
information meeting (planning board), 2 public forums, a minimum of 8 Planning
Board meetings, and 1 public hearing.
• Evaluation of current and projected (I5-year)demographic and sociological factors
pertinent to the city, including (but not limited to) composition of the population,
population growth projections/trends, economic factors, and community growth
patterns.
• Evaluation of current and projected physical factors, including (but not limited to)
land use, zoning, topography, highways and roads, physical barriers, environmental,
sensitive areas, water resources, and stimulants.
• Discussion of development variables including stimulants and obstacles for
development.
• Inventory and evaluation of all existing uses, including (but not limited to) publicly
owned lands, residential types, flood structures, flood areas, etc.
• Conduct a reconnaissance of existing land use conflicts.
• A list of policies and ordinances identified in the land use plan that have or have not
been implemented, noting the impact of the implementation or absence of the
implementation.
• Recommendations concerning methods of adopting policies and ordinances.
• Recommendations for a good working relationship among the Planning Department,
the Planning Board, the public, and other governmental agencies for the
implementation of the plan.
0

I
• High quality supporting maps, graphs, and charts to illustrate data as needed in the
land use plan document and at public meetings.
• Preparation of a Comprehensive Plan that is representative of the citizens of
Southport, the Planning Board, city staff, and the Board of Aldermen.
• Provision of final original maps and supporting text in reproducible form.
The following schedule will be utilized:
1. August, 2000 - Board ofAldermen adopt the Citizen Participation Plan, conduct initial
meeting with the Planning Board, and review the Citizen Participation Plan. The
Planning Board will conduct a public information meeting. The process by which the
City of Southport will solicit the views of a wide cross-section of citizens in the
development of the plan will be explained.
2. August - October, 2000 - Complete background studies.
3. August, 2000 - February, 2001 - Draft Land Use Plan text and present to the Planning
Board as sections are completed.
4. October, 2000 - Conduct first public forum.
5. January, 2001 - Conduct second public forum.
6. February, 2001 - Complete draft Comprehensive Plan and present to the Planning
Board.
7. March, 2001 - Present complete, revised plan to the Planning Board.
8. March, 2001 - Present complete Comprehensive Plan to the Planning Board.
9. March, 2001 - Conduct open house.
10. May, 2001 - Review draft Comprehensive Plan with the Board of Aldermen.
11. June, 2001 - Present the proposed plan to the Board of Aldermen for adoption and
conduct a public hearing.
All meetings of the Planning Board and Board of Aldermen at which the Comprehensive Plan will be
discussed will be advertised in a local newspaper. The public information meeting, public forums,
and public hearing, referenced herein, will also be advertised in a local newspaper. In addition,
public service announcements will be mailed to local radio stations and posted in the municipal
building. All meetings will be open to the public. The citywill encourage and consider all economic,
social, ethnic and cultural viewpoints. No major non-English speaking groups are known to exist in
Southport.
9/6/00
0
I
I
0
I
I
I
I

I
0
G
I
I
I
e
Ii
I
I
APPENDIX II
CITY OF SOUTHPORT
RANKING- PUBLIC FORUM 1/16/01
RANK
I ISSUE
SCORE
1
Preserve cit 's character
130
2
Careful gateway plan
147
3
Re -write zoning ordinance
158
4
Preservation of fragile areas
164
5
Affordable quality of life
198
6
Establish historic commission
200
7
Preserve trees on city property
208
8
Preserve residential areas
216
9
Establish landscape ordinance
244
10
Altemative truck route
248
11
Keep thoroughfare plan in mind
258
12
Funding infrastructure
264
13
Preserve human scale
284
14
Control commercial development on NC 133
293
15
Prohibit boat parking on citV ri ht-of-wa
375
1/17ro1
Ell

I
aAPPENDIX III
CITY OF SOUTHPORT
O1997 CAMA LAND USE PLAN POLICY STATEMENTS
01
A. INTRODUCTION TO POLICY STATEMENTS ,
The previous sections of this plan identify a number of areas of concern dealing with growth,
(� development, and the environment. The plan also discusses many opportunities and assets that
(� exist within the City of Southport. This section provides policies designed to address growth
management and protect the city's assets. The policy statements should address the desires and
O objectives of the citizens of the City of Southport, and respond to the policy statement
requirements of the Coastal Resources Commission as defined by 15A NCAC 7B.
The policy statements are extremely important and have a day-to-day impact on businesses and
0 individual citizens within the city. The statements have an impact in three areas:
(� • CAMA minor and major permitting as required by NCGS 113A-118 prior to
t undertaking any development in any area of environmental concern.
(� • Establishment of local planning policy.
U • Review of proposed projects requiring state or federal assistance or
approval to determine consistency with local policies.
For the issuance of CAMA permits within areas of environmental concern, the state's minimum
oacceptable use standards are defined by 15A NCAC 7H. A local unit of government must adopt
policies which are, at a minimum, equal to and consistent with the state's minimum use
standards. A local unit of government may adopt policies which are more stringent than the
Ominimum use standards. For example, the state standards allow marinas to be located within
primary nursery areas if some minimum conditions are met. A local government may adopt a
policy stating that marinas will not be permitted within primary nursery areas. If this were to
Doccur, a CAMA permit for marina construction in a primary nursery area would not be issued. IT
IS CRUCIALTHATA LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNDERSTAND THE IMPACT OF ITS POLICIES WITHIN AREAS
OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN.
The second area of land use plan application is that of establishing policies to guide the town and
the county's local planning. This may apply both within areas of environmental concern where
CAMA regulations apply and in non-CAMA regulated areas of the city. Under North Carolina
legislation, land use plans are not regulatory controls. Non-CAMA related recommendations must
O be implemented with local land use ordinances such as zoning or subdivision ordinances. if a land
use plan recommends that the average residential density should be three dwelling units per acre
within a particular area, then that density must be achieved through local zoning ordinance or
other regulatory control. (This should not be confused with the interaction of the land use plan
with the CAMA regulations and 15A NCAC 7H use standards.)

The final area of application is that of "Consistency Review." Proposals and applications for state
and federal assistance or requests for agency approval of projects are normally reviewed against
a jurisdiction's land use plan to determine if the project is consistent with local policies.
Inconsistencies of a project with local policies could serve as grounds for denial or revision of a
project. For example, an individual or agency may request state or federal funding to construct
a 30-unit low -to -moderate income housing project. If the proposed location of the project is
within an area in which the land use plan states that the residential density should not exceed
two dwelling units per acre, the project may be judged to be inconsistent with the local land use
plan.
The Coastal Resources Commission requires all governments to specify stated development
policies under each one of five broad topics. These topics include:
-- Resource Protection
-- Resource Production and Management
-- Economic and Community Development
-- Continuing Public Participation
-- Storm Hazard Mitigation, Post -Disaster Recovery, and Evacuation Plans
During 1995 and 1996, the 15A NCAC 7B CAMA planning guidelines were revised. The revised
guidelines included new requirements for the development of policy statements. These changes
included the following policy statement additions:
-- A general vision policy statement describing the type of community
that the local government would like to become within the next
ten years.
-- A basic statement as to the community attitude toward resource
protection.
-- A policy addressing the protection of wetlands identified as being
of the highest functional significance on maps supplied by the
Division'of Coastal Management.
-- A policy addressing moorings and mooring fields.
-- A policy addressing water quality problems and management
measures designed to reduce or eliminate local sources of surface
water quality problems.
-- A statement as to the community attitude toward resource
production and management.
-- A policy addressing commitment to state and federal programs,
including housing rehabilitation, community development block
grants, housing for low and moderate income level citizens, water
and sewer installation, and rural water systems.
2

Q-- A policy addressing assistance to interstate waterways.
Based on the analysis of existing conditions and trends, suggestions from the city's citizens, and
substantial input and guidance from both the City of Southport Planning Board, the policies in the
following sections have been formulated to provide a guide for regulating growth, development,
and resource management throughout the planning period. In developing these policies, many
alternatives were considered by the Planning Board. The alternatives that were not adopted are
included as Appendix I in the 1997 CAMA Land Use Plan.
B. VISION STATEMENT
Southport desires to maintain its quiet residential atmosphere and to protect the city's historic
assets. Population growth should continue at a moderate rate. Historically, growth has occurred
at an average of 1.3% per year. Southport desires low impact, environmentally safe, light
industry. Specifically, Southport will endeavor to accomplish the following:
-1
I
o C.
-- Preservation of the city's historic district.
-- Protection of the city's shoreline vista.
-- Redevelopment of the Central Business District.
-- Preservation of the city's residential areas.
-- Protection of the city's Areas of Environmental Concern consistent with 15A NCAC
7H.
RESOURCE PROTECTION POLICY STATEMENTS
U Community Attitude Toward Resource Protection
Southport will implement resource protection policies which meet the state's 15A NCAC 7H
minimum use standards for the protection of areas of environmental concern. The city is
sensitive to the protection of its shoreline areas. However, it does not desire to impose
regulations which unnecessarily restrict responsible development. Southport's natural resources
play a major role in the city's rich history and aesthetic appeal. Damage to the estuarine system
would result in significant economic loss for the city.
�j Southport's overall policy and management objective for the estuarine system is "to give the
highest priority to the protection and coordinated management of these areas, so as to safeguard
n and perpetuate their biological, social, economic, and aesthetic values and to ensure that
u development occurring within these AEC's is compatible with natural characteristics so as to
minimize the likelihood of significant loss of private property and public resources." (15A NCAC
7H.0203)
C

Physical Limitations
Soils
POLICIES:
(a) In areas with central sewer service, Southport does not consider soil conditions to be an
obstacle to development.
(b) In areas without utilities, Southport will act to mitigate septic tank problems and other
restrictions on development posed by soil limitations.
(c) Southport supports regulation of 404 wetlands by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The
city does not want industrial development as defined by the city's zoning ordinance to
result in any net loss of wetlands.
IMPLEMENTATION:
(a) Southport will enforce all current regulations of the N.C. State Building Code and North
Carolina Division of Health Services relating to building construction and septic tank
installation/replacement in areas with soils restrictions for septic tank construction.
(b) Southport will coordinate all development activity with appropriate county and state
regulatory personnel, and in particular with the Brunswick County Building Inspector and
Sanitarian.
(c) Southport will cooperate with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in the
regulation/enforcement of the 404 wetlands permit process. Except for industrial
development, the city understands this may result in some net wetland loss.
(d) Southport will support the development of a central sewer system to serve areas of
Southport's extraterritorial planning jurisdiction. (�
SCHEDULE (a) - (d): Continuing Activities,. FY1997-2007 �J
Flood Hazard Areas
POLICY: The City of Southport desires to minimize the hazards to life, health, public safety, and n
development within flood hazard areas. U
IMPLEMENTATION:
(a) Southport will coordinate all development within the special flood hazard area with the
city's Inspections Department, North Carolina Division of Coastal Management, FEMA, and
the U.S. Corps of Engineers.
D
4 0

I
D(b) Southport will continue to enforce its existing zoning and flood damage prevention
ordinances and follow the storm hazard mitigation plan contained herein.
0 SCHEDULE (a) - (b): Continuing Activities, FY1997-2007
Q;Groundwater/Protection. of Potable Water Supplies ,
POLICY: The City of Southport desires to conserve its surficial* groundwater resources.
IMPLEMENTATION: The City of Southport will conserve its surficial groundwater resources by
enforcing CAMA and NC Division of Water Quality stormwater run-off regulations, and by
O coordinating local development activities involving chemical storage or underground storage tank
installation/abandonment with Brunswick County Emergency Management personnel and the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality. During the planning period, the city shall review and
O amend the local zoning ordinance with regard to underground chemical and gasoline storage
regulations to ensure a minimum of risk to local groundwater resources.
(� SCHEDULE: Continuing Activity, FY1997-2007
�J Manmade Hazards
OPOLICIES:
O(a) Southport supports regulation of underground storage tanks in order to protect its
groundwater resources.
(b) Southport supports the use of the river channel for shipment of materials to the North
Carolina State Port Terminal at Wilmington.
a(c) The City of Southport opposes the disposal of any toxic wastes including industrial by-
products, as defined by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Listing of Hazardous
Q Substances and Priority Pollutants (developed pursuant to the Clean Water Act of 1977)
within its planning jurisdiction:
DIMPLEMENTATION:
(a) The City of Southport will rely on the technical requirements and state program approval
O for underground storage tanks (40 CFR; Parts 280 and 281), and any subsequent state
regulations concerning underground storage tanks adopted during the planning period.
DSCHEDULE: Continuing Activity, FY1997-2007
(b) Southport will revise its zoning ordinance to incorporate provisions regulating the storage
of toxic wastes within its planning jurisdiction.
D*Groundwaters which are at or just below the surface.
5
D

J
SCHEDULE: FY1998-1999
Stormwater Runoff
POLICY: The City of Southport supports water quality maintenance in order to protect fragile
areas and to provide clean water for recreational purposes. ,
IMPLEMENTATION:
(a) The city will support state regulations relating to stormwater runoff resulting from
development (stormwater Disposal Policy 15NCAC2H.001-.1003).
(b) The City of Southport will support and implement the recommendations of the 1984
Master Drainage Plan.
SCHEDULE (a) - (b): Continuing Activities, FY1997-2007
Cultural/Historic Resources
POLICIES:
(a) Southport will protect its historic resources as a valuable cultural and economic asset.
(b) Through its zoning ordinance, Southport will continue to protect its historic district.
IMPLEMENTATION:
(a) Southport shall coordinate all housing code enforcement/redevelopment projects with
the NC Division of Archives and History, to ensure that any significant architectural details
or buildings are identified and preserved.
(b) Southport will coordinate all public works projects with the NC Division of Archives and
History, to ensure the identification and preservation of significant archaeological sites.
(c) Southport shall consider the establishment of a historic district commission.
SCHEDULE (a) - (b): Continuing Activities, FYI997-2007
Industrial Impacts on Fragile Areas
POLICIES:
(a) The City of Southport does not want industrial development to result in any net loss of
wetlands.
(b) The city will not allow industrial development within its historic district.
.

D(c) The City of Southport will allow industrial development which is consistent with the City
of Southport Zoning Ordinance and within areas of environmental concern, as defined by
Q15A NCAC 7H.
IMPLEMENTATION:
LJ ,
(a) The City of Southport will work with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to coordinate local
approval of industrial projects with the "404" permitting process.
SCHEDULE (a): Continuing Activity, FY1997-2000
0(b)
The City of Southport will rely on its zoning ordinance to prohibit industrial development
within its historic district.
j� (c) Industrial development which can comply with the use standards specified by 15A NCAC
u 7H and the City of Southport zoning ordinance may be located within conservation
classified areas.
DSCHEDULE (b) - (c): Continuing Activities, FY1997-2007
I
1
I
I
111
I
i
Miscellaneous Resource Protection
Marina and Floating Home Development
POLICIES:
(a) Southport will allow the construction of both open water and upland marinas which
comply with the City of Southport Zoning Ordinance.
(b) Southport will permit the construction of drystack storage facilities which comply with
the City of Southport Zoning Ordinance.
(c) Southport opposes the location of floating homes within its jurisdiction.
IMPLEMENTATION:
(a) The city will rely on its zoning ordinance and 15A NCAC 7H to control the location of open
water marinas, upland marinas, and drystack storage facilities. The city will amend its
zoning ordinance to address these issues.
SCHEDULE (a): Continuing Activity, FY1997-2007 and zoning ordinance revision, FY1999-2000
(b) The City of Southport will adopt an ordinance to regulate the location of floating homes
awithin its jurisdiction.
SCHEDULE (b): FY1999-2000
I
0

Development of Sound and Estuarine Islands
There are no sound or estuarine islands within the planning jurisdiction.
Bulkhead Construction
POLICY. The City of Southport will permit bulkhead construction.
IMPLEMENTATION: The city will allow all bulkhead construction which complies with 15A NCAC
7H and the city's zoning ordinance. The city recognizes that this could result in some marsh
damage.
SCHEDULE: Continuing Activity, FY1997-2007
Sea Level Rise
Southport recognizes the uncertainties associated with sea level rise. The rate of rise is difficult
to predict. Those factors combine to make it difficult, if not impossible, to establish specific
policies to deal with the effects of sea level rise. While a policy is not provided, the city will
implement the following:
IMPLEMENTATION:
(a) In response to Sea level rise, Southport will review all local building and land use related
ordinances to establish setback standards, long-term land use plans, density controls,
bulkhead restrictions, buffer vegetation protection requirements, and building designs
which will facilitate the movement of structures.
SCHEDULE: FY2003-2007
(b) Southport will support bulkheading to protect its shoreline areas from intruding water
resulting from rising sea level. (j
SCHEDULE: Continuing Activity, FY1997-2007 �J
Package Treatment Plant Use a
POLICY.
a
(a) Southport opposes the construction of package treatment plants within its city limits.
(b) Southport will not oppose package treatment plant construction within its ETJ. If any
package plants are approved by the state, the city supports the requirement of a specific
contingency plan specifying how ongoing private operation and maintenance of the plant
will be provided, and detailing provisions for assumption of the plant into a public system
should the private operation fail. Operational plans should also address elimination of
O

7
I
I
I
I
package treatment plants when the system owner elects to connect to a central sewer
system.
IMPLEMENTATION: The City of Southport will rely upon the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality to implement this policy.
SCHEDULE: Continuing Activity, FY1997-2007
Maritime Forests
Based on the Maritime Forest Protection Initiative, May 24, 1990, there are no major maritime
forest sites that are under Southport's planning jurisdiction.
Mooring Fields
POLICY: The City of Southport will allow the establishment of mooring fields within its planning
jurisdiction.
IMPLEMENTATION: The City of Southport will develop a local ordinance and a waterfront
development plan to regulate the development of mooring fields.
SCHEDULE: FY1999-2000
Water Quality Management
POLICY: The City of Southport supports the North .Carolina Division of Water Quality
a Management's goals for water quality management as stated on page 1-32 of the 1997 CAMA Land
Use Plan.
aIMPLEMENTATION: The City of Southport will review all local ordinances to determine what, if
any, revisions should be made to reduce the potential for impairment of water quality. Such
revisions may include but not necessarily be limited to:
- Reduction of the constructionofimpervious surfaces.
-- Provision of vegetative buffers along estuarine shorelines.
-- Allowing or requiring strip paving.
-- Requiring retention and/or detention pond facilities.
OSCHEDULE: FY1999-2007
7
7
D. RESOURCE PRODUCTION AND MANAGEMENT POLICIES
Community Attitude Toward Resource Production and Management
Southport desires to accomplish resource production and management which is consistent with
15A NCAC 7H. The city believes that the state's minimum use standards, utilized in concert with
Il
E

0
local ordinances, provide ample protection for the areas of environmental concern located within
the city's planning jurisdiction.
Recreation Resources
, POLICIES:
11
(a) The City of Southport supports a comprehensive program of both active and passive
recreational opportunities. 0
(b) The City of Southport supports redevelopment of the old yacht basin, Southport Marina,
and the city pier areas. This should be a cooperative public -private sector venture. Any
plans for redevelopment should be closely coordinated with plans for redevelopment of
Southport's Central Business District.
(c) The city supports continued development of shoreline access facilities and preservation
of the city's shoreline areas.
IMPLEMENTATION:
(a) The City of Southport will apply for all available grant funds to aide in the development
of the Old Yacht Basin.
(b) The City of Southport will support and implement its shoreline access plan.
SCHEDULE (a) - (b): Continuing Activities, FY1997-2007
(c) The city will refine existing zoning and related ordinances to provide a more unified
waterfront development character, preserve and make maximum use of existing natural
areas and green spaces, minimize impacts of natural hazards, and preserve public access
to the Cape Fear River.
SCHEDULE (c): FY.1998-2000
(d) Southport will amend the December, 1990 Shoreline Access Plan to accommodate the n
provisions of Senate Bill 1059** and prepare a specific waterfront development plan.
SCHEDULE (d): FY2000-2001
(e) The City of Southport will prepare a city-wide comprehensive recreation plan to address
both active and passive recreation needs.
SCHEDULE (e): FY1998-1999
**Senate Bill 1059 is discussed on page 1-33 of the 1997 CAMA Land Use Plan.
a
10

7
it
0
I
Productive Agricultural Lands
There are no significant agriculturally productive lands located within Southport's planning
jurisdiction. Therefore, a policy is not required.
,Productive Forestlands , ,
There are no significant commercially productive forestlands located within Southport's planning
jurisdiction. Therefore, a policy is not required.
Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Development Impacts on Resources
POLICY. The City of Southport will allow development within areas of environmental concern.
a IMPLEMENTATION: The city will rely on 15A NCAC 7H, and its subdivision and zoning ordinances
to regulate development within areas of environmental concern. In all other areas, development
will be allowed which is consistent with the city's subdivision and zoning ordinances.
.SCHEDULE: Continuing Activity, FY1997-2007
Marine Resource Areas
POLICY. The City of Southport supports responsible usage and development in marine resource
aareas.
IMPLEMENTATION:
(a) Southport will rely on 15A NCAC 7H.0207 to regulate use and development within
estuarine and public trust areas.
it
I
N
I
I
I
(b) In structures that extend into or over estuarine and public trust waters, replacement of
structures and/or change of use will be allowed so long as the structure is consistent with
or allowed by the CRC.
(c) The City of Southport reserves the right to comment on the individual policies and
requirements of the North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries. The city understands that
this position does not constitute a policy statement and that Marine Fisheries is not
obligated to respond to any future comments offered by the city.
SCHEDULE (a) - (c): Continuing Activities, FY1997-2007
(d) Southport will amend the December, 1990 Shoreline Access Plan to accommodate the
provisions of Senate Bill 1059 and prepare a specific waterfront development plan, and
will support development over estuarine and public trust waters as allowed by North
Carolina Senate Bill 1059.
SCHEDULE (d): Revise plan FY2000-2001, Support for development is a Continuing Activity,
FY1997-2007
11

Aquaculture Activities
POLICIES:
(a) Southport encourages all aquaculture activities which meet applicable federal, state, and
local policies and permit requirements. However, Southport reserves the right to
comment on all aquaculture activities which require Division of Water Quality permitting.
(b) Southport objects to any discharge of water from aquaculture activities that will degrade
in any way the receiving waters. Southport objects to withdrawing water from aquifers
or surface sources if such withdrawal will endanger water quality or water supply from
the aquifers or surface sources.
(c) Southport will support only aquaculture activities which do not alter significantly and
negatively the natural environment of coastal wetlands, estuarine waters, and public
trust areas as shown on the Land Classification Map.
IMPLEMENTATION: Southport will rely on the appropriate state and federal agencies to
implement its aquaculture policies.
SCHEDULE. Continuing Activity, FY1997-2007
Off -Road Vehicles
Off -road vehicles are not an issue within Southport's planning jurisdiction and a policy is not
required.
Peat or Phosphate Mining
Peat or phosphate mining is not an issue in Southport's planning jurisdiction and a policy is not
required. However, Southport objects to any mining outside of its planning jurisdiction that may
endanger water quality of the town's water supply from its aquifers or surface waters.
E. ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Community Attitude Toward Economic and Community Development
Southport desires to control its economic base, including tourism, commercial fishing, retail and
wholesale trade, real estate and construction, and industrial development. However, Southport
does not want to jeopardize Conservation areas. Southport will allow growth and development
at the densities specified in the land classification definitions. These densities are consistent
with existing City of Southport zoning. The desired pattern of development is shown on the Land
Classification Map 11 and identified on Page III-3 of the 1997 CAMA Land Use Plan.
I
0
I
11
11
I
I
I
I
12
I

it
aWater Supply
aPOLICIES:
(a) The City of Southport supports extension of the water supply system throughout its
planning jurisdiction.
(b) The City of Southport supports protection of the ground water supply.
IMPLEMENTATION:
(a) By local ordinance, the city requires that all existing and new residential and commercial
development be connected to both the city water and sewer systems.
n (b) By local ordinance, the city will allow the installation of private wells for irrigation only
u through the NCDEM permit process.
(c) The city is aware that inappropriate land uses near well fields increase the possibility of
well contamination. Land uses near groundwater sources are regulated by the NC Division
of Water Quality through NCAC Subchapters 2L and 2C. Southport recognizes the
0 importance of protecting potable water supplies, and therefore supports the enforcement
of these regulations by the State of North Carolina. The city will pursue all available
state and federal funding for expansion of the water system.
SCHEDULE (a) - (c): Continuing Activities, FY1997-2007
Sewer System
POLICY.
(a) The City of Southport supports extension of its sewage collection system throughout its
planning jurisdiction.
0 IMPLEMENTATION:
0
I
a
a
I
(a) The city subdivision ordinance requires all subdivisions within its corporate limits to have
city sewer service.
(b) The city will pursue all available state and federal funding for expansion of its sewer
system.
SCHEDULE (a) - (b): Continuing Activities, FY1997-2007
13

I
Stormwater 0
POLICIES: n
(a) The City of Southport will support projects and local land use development controls to
eliminate stormwater drainage problems throughout its planning jurisdiction, especially (�
in those areas discussed in Section II, 9. Drainage, page II-17 of th 1997 CAMA Land Use �J
Plan.
(b) The city will support mitigation of negative impacts of stormwater runoff on all
conservation classified areas.
(c) It is Southport's policy that all North Carolina Department of Transportation projects
should be designed to limit to the extent possible stormwater runoff into estuarine/public
trust waters.
IMPLEMENTATION:
(a) Southport will cooperate with the NCDOT, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality,
and other state agencies in mitigating the impact of stormwater runoff on all conservation
classified areas. The city will support the Division of Water Quality stormwater runoff
retention permitting process through its zoning permit system and subdivision approval
process.
(b) The city will apply for all available state and federal grant funds, and utilize Powell Bill
funds, to improve stormwater drainage systems associated with existing rights -of -way.
(c) The city will continue to implement its master drainage plan.
SCHEDULE (a) - (c): Continuing Activities, FY1997-2007
Solid Waste
POLICIES:
(a) The City of Southport supports regional multi -county approach to solid waste disposal.
(b) Southport supports efforts to recycle and reduce waste.
IMPLEMENTATION:
(a) The city will cooperate with any efforts to educate people and businesses on waste
reduction and recycling. Southport vigorously supports recycling by its residents and
businesses and supports setting up practical collection methods and education efforts to
achieve a high degree of city-wide recycling.
(b) Southport will implement the recommendation of the regional composting study when
complete. 0
14 0

I
SCHEDULE (a) - (b): Continuing Activities, FY1997-2007
a (c) Southport supports the siting of recycling centers which are located consistent with the
city's zoning ordinance. The city's zoning ordinance will be revised to address this issue.
SCHEDULE (c): Amend ordinance,FY1999-2000
Energy Facility Siting and Development
POLICY.
0(a)
Southport supports responsible and environmentally safe expansion of public and private
energy production and distribution facilities.
I
I
I
I
I
L
I
11
IMPLEMENTATION:
(a) The Cogentrix steam -generating plant is the only energy generating facilities located
within the city's extraterritorial jurisdiction. The CPEtL Nuclear Power Plant is located
immediately north of the city's ETJ. Some of the CPEtL property is located within the
city's ETJ. The city will consider the need for expansion of the Cogentrix and other
energy facilities on a case -by -case basis, judging the need for expansion against all
identified possible adverse impacts. The location of energy production facilities will be
regulated by the city's zoning ordinance.
(b) Southport will not encourage off -shore drilling operations but will not oppose onshore
support facilities for which an environmental impact statement has been prepared with
a finding of no significant impact on the environment. The location of on -shore support
facilities located within the city's planning jurisdiction will be regulated by the city's
zoning ordinance.
SCHEDULE (a) - (b): Continuing Activities, FY1997-2007
Redevelopment of Developed Areas
POLICIES:
(a) Southport supports redevelopment of substandard deteriorated areas of the city including
both residential and commercial areas.
(b) Following a hurricane or other natural disaster, Southport supports redevelopment which
complies with applicable federal, state, and local policies.
IMPLEMENTATION:
(a) Southport will attempt to correct its worst substandard housing conditions by:
-- enforcing the city's Minimum Housing Code;
-- applying for Community Development Block Grant Community Revitalization funds;
15

9
-- coordinating redevelopment efforts with the Southport Building Inspections
Department.
SCHEDULE (a): Continuing Activities, FY1997-2007
(b) Following a natural disaster, the city will allow the reconstruction of any structures 0
demolished by natural disaster when the reconstruction complies with all applicable local,
state, and federal regulations. However, reconstruction cannot be more intense than
that which previously existed. This is governed by the city's zoning ordinance.
(c) The city will prepare a city-wide housing strategy to increase the quantity and quality of
affordable housing.
SCHEDULE (b) - (c): FY1998-1999
Types and Locations of Desired Industry
POLICY. The city desires to achieve responsible industrial development which will not adversely
affect the natural environment or the quality of established residential areas.
IMPLEMENTATION: The following will be enforced through the city's zoning ordinance:
-- Industrial sites should be accessible to municipal/central water and sewer
services.
-- Industries which are noxious by reason of the emission of smoke, dust, glare,
noise, and vibrations, and those which deal primarily in hazardous products such
as explosives, should not be located in Southport.
-- Industrial development and/or industrial zoning should not infringe on established
residential development.
-- Industrial development should be located in industrial park areas of the
extraterritorial jurisdiction and not in areas classified as conservation.
SCHEDULE: Continuing Activity, FY1997-2007
Estuarine Access
POLICY: The City of Southport supports continued development of shoreline access facilities.
IMPLEMENTATION:
(a) Southport supports the state's shoreline access policies as set forth in Chapter 15A,
Subchapter 7M of the North Carolina Administrative Code. The city will conform to CAMA
and other state and federal environmental regulations affecting the development of
estuarine access areas. The city has a Shoreline Access Plan that was adopted in
December, 1990. That plan is considered a functional extension of this land use plan, and
IV

aits policies/recommendations will be supported by the City of Southport. The city will
continue participating in state/local sponsored access projects.
aSCHEDULE (a): Continuing Activity, FY1997-2007
a(b) Southport will support the implementation,of the provisions of Senate Bill 1059.
SCHEDULE (b): Continuing Activity, FY1997-2007
a(c) Southport will amend the December, 1990 Shoreline Access Plan to accommodate the
provisions of Senate Bill 1059 and prepare a specific waterfront development plan.
OSCHEDULE (c): FY1998-1999
Commitment to State and Federal Programs
POLICY. Southport will be receptive to and support all state and federal funding programs which
Qare beneficial to the city.
IMPLEMENTATION: The City of Southport Board of Aldermen will pursue funding and project
O development through the following state and federal programs: North Carolina Department of
Transportation road and bridge improvement programs; drainage planning and erosion control
activities carried out by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, which is valuable to
a farmers; dredging and channel maintenance by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; federal and
state projects which provide efficient and safe boat access for sport fishing; and community
development block grants, low -to -moderate income housing, housing rehabilitation, housing for
the elderly, and North Carolina Housing Finance Agency housing improvement programs.
SCHEDULE: Continuing Activity, FY1997-2007
aAssistance in Channel Maintenance
POLICY. Proper maintenance of channels is very important to Southport because of the
substantial economic impact of commercial fisheries and successful operation of the State Port
at Wilmington: If silt or other deposits fill in the channels, safe and efficient movement of
Qcommercial fishing and transport vessels could be impeded.
IMPLEMENTATION: Southport will consider on a case -by -case basis the provision of assistance to
a the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and/or state officials to obtain spoil sites, provide financial aid,
and assist in securing or providing easements for work.
SCHEDULE: Continuing Activity, FY1997-2007
Transportation
aPOLICY. The City of Southport supports transportation improvements which will improve highway
safety, regional accessibility, and traffic flow within the city's planning jurisdiction.
17

IMPLEMENTATION:
(a) Southport supports construction of the following state transportation improvement
projects:
I
NC 133 Town Creek, Replace Bridge No. 61 Year 2000
a
NC 133 Allen Creek, Replace Bridge No. 56 Year 2000
NC 87, NC 133, and Intersection of NC 87, NC 133, and Sunny Identified Future Need
Access Road Point Access Road. Realign NC 87 to allow
through movement of traffic and install
traffic signal
New Route NC 211 /NC 133 to NC 87 at SR 1525, Right -of -Way Acquisition 2003
O
Construct a two lane connector on new
location
NC 211 Widen NC 211 from near the intersection No schedule
a
with NC 87 to St. James Plantation
NC 211 Install a stop light at NC 211 and Stuart No schedule
Avenue
a
New Route Construct a new "east side connector" to No schedule
allow better traffic flow from the East
Moore Street area to north of the city due
to anticipated residential development on
the east side of the city
Leonard Street Make drainage and general improvements to No schedule
Leonard Street
(b) Southport supports construction of a second bridge to Oak Island and an arterial to
improve accessibility from NC 211 /NC 87 to Moore Street.
(c) The City of Southport supports the recommendations contained in the Pedestrian Safety
Study.
a
(d) , Southport will periodically review local ordinances relating to speed limits and traffic flow
with the goal of reducing congestion and risk in severely -congested or unsafe areas.
SCHEDULE (a) - (c): Continuing Activities, FY1997-2007
Assistance in Interstate Waterways
POLICY. Southport supports continued maintenance and protection of the interstate waterway.
The city considers the interstate waterway to be a valuable economic asset.
IMPLEMENTATION: Southport will provide assistance in maintaining the waterway by helping to
obtain or providing dredge spoil sites, if surplus city property is available and, when possible,
providing easements across city -owned property for work.
SCHEDULE: Continuing Activity, FY1997-2007
18

Tourism
POLICY: Southport views tourism as a significant contributor to the local economy and supports
continued development of the tourist industry.
IMPLEMENTATION:
(a) Southport will support North Carolina Department of Transportation projects to improve
access to the city.
(b) Southport will support projects that will increase public access to shoreline areas.
(c) Southport will continue to support the activities of the North Carolina Division of Travel
and Tourism; specifically, the monitoring of tourism -related industry, efforts to promote
tourism -related commercial activity, and efforts to enhance and provide shoreline
resources.
SCHEDULE: Continuing Activities, FY1997-2007
19