Land Use Plan Addendum-1998

CITY OF HAVELOCK
NORTH CAROLINA
1996 LAND USE PLAN
ADDENDUM, 1998
Adopted by the City of Havelock Board of Commissioners: March 22, 1999
Certified by the Coastal Resources Commission: March 26, 1999
Prepared By:
Holland Consulting Planners, Inc.
Wilmington, North Carolina
The preparation of this document was financed in part through a grant provided by the
North Carolina Coastal Management Program, through funds provided by the Coastal
Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, which is administered by the Office of
Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration.

CITY OF HAVELOCK
LAND USE PLAN ADDENDUM
TABLE OF CONTENTS
P ,,e
EXPLANATION OF THE 1998 LAND USE PLAN ADDENDUM .................. 1
SECTION I: ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
A.
ESTABLISHMENT OF INFORMATION BASE .........................
I-1
B.
POPULATION AND HOUSING ...................................
I-1
1.
REGIONAL AND COUNTY POPULATION .....................
I-1
2.
GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF CRAVEN COUNTY POPULATION,
1970-1995.............................................
I-2
3.
HAVELOCK POPULATION ..............................
I-4
4.
HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS .............................
I-5
C.
ECONOMY ..................................... .... .....
I-5
4.
MCAS CHERRY POINT IMPACT ............................
I-5
D.
EXISTING LAND USE .........................................
I-7
1.
RESIDENTIAL .........................................
I-9
2.
COMMERCIAL AND SERVICES ............................
I-10
3.
INDUSTRIAL ..........................................
I-11
4.
GOVERNMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL .......................
I-11
7.
TRANSPORTATION, COMMUNICATIONS, AND UTILITIES ........
I-12
9.
BASINWIDE WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT ................
I-12
10.
EXISTING ORDINANCES AND LAND USE CONTROLS ............
I-15
F.
DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINTS: LAND SUITABILITY .................
I-16
7.
MANMADE HAZARDS ...................................
I-16
8.
FRAGILE AREAS ................................... ...I-17
f. Natural Resource Fragile Areas ......... "......:.........
I-19
g. Marine Resources ..................................
I-20
G.
DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINTS: PUBLIC FACILITIES .................
I-22
4.
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL .................................
I-22
5.
TRANSPORTATION .............. .....................I-23
a. Roads..........................................I-23
6.
EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ...............................
I-27
7.
RECREATIONAL FACILITIES ................. .. ...........
I-29
8.
POLICE DEPARTMENT ................. . ...............
I-30
9.
FIRE/RESCUE DEPARTMENT ..............................
I-30
9.
HEALTH SERVICES.....................................I-31
12.
CABLE TELEVISION SERVICE ..............................
I-31
Table of Contents 1 '

Page
SECTION II: PROJECTED LAND DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS
A. PROJECTED DEMAND FOR DEVELOPMENT ........................ H-1
1. DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS ................................. H-1
7. EDUCATION .......................................... II-5
8. SEWER SYSTEM ........................................ 11-5
9. WATER SYSTEM ....................................... II-6
10. STORM DRAINAGE ..................................... II-7
12. POLICE, FIRE, AND RESCUE SERVICES ...................... II-7
SECTION IV: POLICY STATEMENTS
A. INTRODUCTION TO POLICY STATEMENTS IV-1
VISION STATEMENT ........................................ IV-2
B. RESOURCE PROTECTION POLICY STATEMENTS ................... IV-3
C. RESOURCE PRODUCTION AND MANAGEMENT POLICIES ............. IV-4
D. ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .................... IV-4
E. CONTINUING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ........................... IV-6
TABLES
Table 1 Total Population and Percent Change for CAMA-Regulated Counties and
State, 1980, 1990, and 1995 ...........................
I-1
Table 2
City of Havelock and Craven County, Total Year -Round Population and
Percentage Change by Township and Municipality, 1970-1995 .........
I-3
Table 3
Total Population, 1970-1995 City of Havelock, Craven County, North
Carolina ...........................................
I-4
Table 4
1995 Detailed Population, City of Havelock and MCAS Cherry Point ...
I-4
Table 5
Housing for Bachelor and Married Personnel MCAS Cherry Point .....
I-5
Table 6
1997 Economic Impact Summary MCAS Cherry Point .............
I-6
Table 7
City of Havelock 1997 Existing Land Use .....................
I-7
Table 8
City of Havelock Tier H Reporters, 1995 ......................
I-17
Table 9
Craven County Solid Waste Disposal, FY91-92 to FY95-96 ..........
I-23
Table 10
Havelock Schools Enrollment vs. Capacity, 1997-1998 .............
I-27
Table 11
Recreation Sites/Facilities Used by the City of Havelock Parks and
Recreation ..........................................
I-29
0
Table of Contents 2 1 0
11

Page
Table 12 Total Year -Round Population and Percentage Change by Township and
Municipality, Craven County, 1995-2005, No Base Loading ......... H-2
Table 13 Total Year -Round Population and Percentage Change by Township and
Municipality, Craven County, 1995-2005, Low Growth Base Loading ... II-3
Table 14 Total Year -Round Population and Percentage Change by Township and
Municipality, Craven County, 1995-2005, High Growth Base Loading ... II-4
INF:11
Map 1
City of Havelock Existing Land Use .........................
I-8
Map 2
Havelock Area Transportation Issues .........................
I-13
Map 3
City of Havelock Areas of Environmental Concern ................
I-18
Map 4
City of Havelock Water Classifications .......................
I-21
Map 5
City of Havelock Average Daily Traffic Counts ..................
I-24
Map 6
City of Havelock Recommended Thoroughfare Plan ...............
I-26
Map 7
City of Havelock Public Facilities ...........................
I-28
APPENDICES
Appendix I City of Havelock Policies Considered But Not Adopted
Appendix II City of Havelock Citizen Participation Plan
Table of Contents 3 ,

CITY OF HAVELOCK
1996 Land Use Plan
ADDENDUM, 1998
U
QEXPLANATION OF THE 1998 LAND USE PLAN ADDENDUM
The City of Havelock last updated its Land Use Plan in 1996. That plan was adopted by the City
of Havelock, and received certification by the Coastal Resources Commission (CRC) July 26,
1996. The "Land Use Planning Guidelines" outlined in Subchapter 7B of the North Carolina
Administrative Code (NCAC) requires that the Land Use Plan be updated by the local planning
jj unit and submitted for reapproval to the CRC within five years of adoption. The Coastal
j Resources Commission has requested the City of Havelock to update their Land Use Plan. This
request is due to recent changes in NCAC 7B (September 28, 1995) and the need to coordinate
Land Use Plan updates on a county -by -county basis, requiring all municipalities within a given
county, as well as the county, to update their plans at the same time. The primary reason for this
change is to create the opportunity for neighboring municipalities and the county in which they
are located to work together in the formulation of their plans.
This document will serve as an addendum to the 1996 Land Use Plan and will satisfy CAMA
planning requirements for- the next five years. This addendum addresses only the additional
requirements included in the revised NCAC 7B and provides more recent data where applicable.
This addendum does not address all of the topics covered in the 1996 Land Use Plan. However,
this addendum, in conjunction with the 1996 Land Use Plan Update, addresses all requirements
of the revised 7B planning guidelines.
The following additional requirements will need to be addressed in the policy statements of this
addendum:
-- A general vision policy statement describing the type of community
that the local government would like to become within the next ten
years.
a — A basic statement as to the community attitude toward resource
protection.
n -- A policy addressing the protection of wetlands identified as being
ll of the highest functional significance on maps supplied by the
Division of Coastal Management, where applicable.
A policy addressing moorings and mooring fields.
0 Explanation of 1998 Land Use Plan Addendum 1 1
111

A policy addressing water quality problems and management
measures designed to reduce or eliminate local sources of surface
water quality problems.
A statement as to the community attitude toward resource
production and management.
-- A statement as to the community attitude toward economic and
community development.
-- A policy addressing commitment to state and federal programs,
including housing rehabilitation, community development block
grants, housing for low and moderate income level citizens, water
and sewer installation, and rural water systems.
-- A policy addressing assistance to interstate waterways.
Since this document is intended to be used in conjunction with the 1996 Land Use Plan, page
numbers and subject headings correspond with the 1996 plan where changes to that plan text were
made. In some instances, new tables and pages have been added; these are noted as new tables
or pages. In addition, map numbers in the addendum do not always match with those in the 1996
plan because new maps with additional information are included in the addendum.
Explanation of 1998 Land Use Plan Addendum 2 1

SECTION I: ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
U
A. ESTABLISHMENT OF INFORMATION BASE
This 1998 Land Use Plan Addendum for the City of Havelock has been prepared in accordance
Q with requirements of the North Carolina Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA). Specifically,
this document complies with Subchapter 7B, "Land Use Planning Guidelines," of the North
Carolina Administrative Code, as amended, September 28, 1995.
a I-9.
n B. POPULATION AND HOUSING
u 1. REGIONAL AND COUNTY POPULATION (NEW SECTION)
QFifteen of the twenty Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) regulated counties experienced a
net permanent population growth from 1990 to 1995. As Table 1 indicates, the five counties with
a negative population growth were Hertford, Hyde, Onslow, Tyrrell, and Washington.* During
the five-year period, Craven County ranked tenth in rate of population growth.
n Table 1 (NEW TABLE)
llTotal Population and Percent Change for
CAMA-Regulated Counties and State, 1980, 1990, and 1995
Percent Change
County
1980
1990
1995
' 90-' 95
Beaufort
40,355
42,283
43,330
2.5 %
Bertie
21,024
20,388
20,638
1.2%
Brunswick
35,777
50,985
60,739
19.1%
Camden
5,829
5,904
6,316
7.0%
Carteret
41,092
52,553
57,612
9.6%
Chowan
12,558
13,506
14,031
3.9 %.
Craven
71,043
81,613
85,816
5.1%
Currituck
11,089
13,736
15,818
15.2% ;
Dare
13,377
22,746
25,758
13.2%
Gates
8,875
9,305
9,798
5.3%
Hertford
23,368
22,523
22,468
-0.2%
Hyde
5,873
5,411
5,211
-3.7%
*Onslow County's decline is the result of fluctuations in military personnel.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-1 '

Table 1 (continued)
Percent Change
County
1980
1990
1995
' 90-' 95
New Hanover
103,471
120,284
139,577
16.0%
Onslow
112,784
149,838
147,912
-1.3%
Pamlico
10,398
11,368
11,869
4.4%
Pasquotank
28,462
31,298
33,290
6.4%
Pender
22,262
28,855
34,671
20.2%
Perquimans
9,486
10,447
10,650
1.9 %
Tyrrell
3,975
3,856
3,812
-1.1 %
Washington
14,801
13,997
13,766
-1.7 %
Total CAMA Counties
595,899
710,896
763,082
28.1 %
State of North Carolina
5,880,095
6,632,448
7,194,238
22.3 %
Source: Office of State Planning.
2. GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF CRAVEN COUNTY'S POPULATION-1970-1995
(NEW SECTION)
The most significant demographic trend in Craven County since 1970 has been an increase in
"urban" population. The U.S. Census classifies "urban" population as that portion of the
population living in incorporated municipalities or Census Designated Places (CDPs) with a
population of 2,500 or more. In 1995, Craven County's "urban" populace was located in
Havelock, New Bern, River Bend, and Trent Woods. These four areas had a combined population
of 49,554, or 57.7% of the total 1995 county population of 85,816. The 1990 Census year was
the first year that Craven County's designated urban population exceeded the rural population.
Table 2 depicts the geographic distribution of Craven County's population by municipality and
unincorporated areas in 1970, 1980, 1990 and 1995. During the twenty-five year.period, the
county's municipal population increased by 151.3 %, while the population located in
unincorporated areas decreased by 19.4 % . The major reason for the dramatic growth in municipal
population from 1970-1995 was the 1979 annexation of Cherry Point MCAS by the City of
Havelock, and the incorporation of River Bend. Havelock, River Bend, and Trent Woods have
displayed rapid municipal growth over the twenty-five year period.
Of the county's four "rural" municipalities, only Cove City and Vanceboro enjoyed population
growth from 1970-1995. While Bridgeton had a very slight population decrease from 1970-1995
(-0.7 %), Dover's population dropped by 21.7 % over the twenty-five year period.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-2 '

Table 2 (NEW TABLE)
City of Havelock and Craven County, NC
Total Year -Round Population and Percent Change by Township and Municipality, 1970 - 1995
Township Municipality or Area Total Year -Round Population
1970
1980
1990
1995
Township 1
Vanceboro
758
833
946
1,015
Unincorporated Areas
4,188
4,526
4,992
4,891
Total Township
4,946
5,359
5,938
5,906
Township 2
Bridgeton
520
461
498
516
Unincorporated Areas
2,737
3,953
5,873
6,221
Total Township
3,257
4,414
6,371
6,737
Township 3
Cove City
485
500
497
569
Dover
585
600
452
458,
Unincorporated Areas
2,767
2,703
2,479
2,307
Total Township
3,837
3,803
3,427
3,334
Township 5
Total Township
2,047
2,551
2,635
2,594
Township 6
Havelock
3,012
17,718
20,300
21,042
Unincorporated Areas
17,786
4,245
4,812
3,553
Total Township
20,798
21,963
25,112
24,595
Township 7
Total Township
4,757
6,149
6,878
6,870
Township 8
New Bern
14,660
14,557
17,363
21,696
River Bend
--
959
2,408
2,655
Trent Woods
719
1,177
2,366
4,161
Unincorporated Areas
5,746
7,952
6,656
4,829
Total Township
21,125
24,645
28,793
33,341
Township 9
Total Township.
1,787
2,145
2,459
2,454
Percentage Change
Overall
'70-'80
'80-'90 -
'90-'95
'70-'95
9.9%
13.6%
7.2%
33.9%
8.1%
10.3%
-2.0%
16.7%
8.4%
10.8%
-0.5%
19.4%
-11.3%
8.0%
3.6%
-0.7%
44.4%
48.6%
5.9%
227.2%
35.5 %
44.3 %
5.7 %
206.8 %
3.1%
-0.6%
14.4%
17.3%
2.6%
-24.8%
-1.3%
-21.7%
-2.3%
-8.3%
-7.4%
-19.9%
-0.9%
-9.9%
-2.7%
-13.1%
24.6%
3.3%
-1.5%
26.7%
488.2%
14.6%
3.7%
598.6%
-76.1 %
13.4 %
-35.4 %
-500.5 %
5.6%
14.3%
-2.1%
18.2%
29.3%
11.9%
-0.1%
44.4%
-0.7%
19.3%
24.9%
47.9%
--
151.1 %
10.2 %
--
63.7%
101.0%
75.8%
578.7%
38.4%
-16.3%
-37.8%
-18.9%
16.7%
16.8%
15.7%
57.8%
20.0%
14.6%
-0.2%
37.3%
Total Municipalities 20,739 36,805 44,829 52,112 77.5% 21.8% 16.2% 151.3%
Total Unincorporated Areas 41,815 34,238 36,784 33,704 -18.1% 7.4% -9.1% -19.4%
Total County 62,554 71,043 81,613 85,816 13.6% 14.9% 5.1% 37.1%
Sources: N.C. State Data Center; Holland Consulting Planners, Inc.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-3 '

I-9.
3. HAVELOCK POPULATION
The City of Havelock has experienced substantial growth in its population since 1970. The 1970
Census figures indicated a total population of 3,012 persons. The 1995 total population was
21,042, an increase of 598.6%. This growth rate is the highest of any Craven County
municipality. Based on the number of homes (885) and average City of Havelock household size
(3.6) in 1990, it can be estimated that there was a total of 3,186 persons residing within the City
of Havelock ETJ. Table 3 provides detailed population trends for Havelock, Craven County, and
North Carolina.
Table 3
Total Population - 1970-1995
City of Havelock, Craven County, North Carolina
1970-1995
19701 1980 1 19902 19953 o Change
Havelock 3,012 17,718 20,300* 21,042 598.6%
Craven County 62,554 71,043 81,613 85,816 37.1 %
North Carolina 5,084,411 5,880,095 6,628,637 7,098,336 39.6%
Sources: 1 NC Municipal Population, Office of State Planning; 2 1990 U.S. Census Data;
3 State Data Center.
*Adjusted total. Note: The 1990 total population was the only data adjusted for Havelock.
The population growth of Havelock has been largely due to the military presence of the Marine
Corps Air Station at Cherry Point. Cherry Point was established in 1941 and was annexed by the
City of Havelock on December 28, 1979. Table 4 provides detailed population data for Havelock
and Cherry Point.
Table 4
1995 Detailed Population
City of Havelock and MCAS Cherry Point
Persons Residing in Havelock 1 7,883
Persons Residing on Base 2 10,782
TOTAL 18,665
1 Includes retired military/dependents, civilians, and active duty/dependents.
2 Includes military/dependents.
Source: MCAS Community Plans and Liaison Office.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-4 1

I-12.
4. HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS
Housing on MCAS Cherry Point is provided for bachelors and married personnel. There are
3,806 spaces for bachelor personnel. This includes 254 spaces for transients and change of station
personnel. For the married military personnel and their families, there are 2,764 family housing
units plus a mobile home park with 76 spaces. Table 5 provides detailed housing unit
information.
Table 5
Housing for Bachelor and Married Personnel
MCAS Cherry Point
MARRIED
BACHELOR
Officer
Officer
Apartments
48
Field Grade & Above
14
Two -Story Units
49
Company Grade
38
D
Capehart
169
Transient Quarters
78
Townhouses
60
Staff Noncommissioned Officer
Staff Noncommissioned Officer
Capehart
679
E-6 & Above
132
Townhouses
240
Transient Quarters
42
�}
Enlisted
Slocum Village
775
Enlisted
E-5 & Below
3,368
LJ
Hancock Village
347
Transient Quarters
122
Fort Macon Village
249
Permanent Change of Station
12
Lanham Housing
148
(E-1 & Above)
D
Mobile Home Spaces
76
TOTAL
2,840
3,806
n
'
1J
Source: 1994 Economic Impact, Marine Corps Air
Station Cherry Point, NC.
I-17.
C. ECONOMY
4. MCAS CHERRY POINT IMPACT
Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point exerts a considerable amount of economic influence in the
quad -county (Carteret, Craven, Jones, and Pamlico) region, as well as the State of North
Carolina. Approximately $324,900,000 in salaries is paid to residents of Craven County. ' Table
6 is a summary of the economic impact of MCAS Cherry Point to the state and the quad -county
region.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-5 '

Salaries
Military
Civilian Appropriated
Civilian Nonappropriated
Purchasing and Contracting
Construction/Maintenance/Service
Electric
Telephone
Travel (Administrative/Training)
Training
Federal School Funds
Health and Medical
Civilian Health & Medical
Program of the Uniform
Services (CHAMPUS)
Active Duty Inpatient Care in
Civilian Hospitals
Table 6
1997 Economic Impact Summary
MCAS Cherry Point
Percent Percent
Total Total Spent Spent Total Spent Spent in
Expenditures in NC in NC Quad -County Quad -County
$283,914,500
$283,914,500
100%
$272,557,900
96%
283,351,000
281,614,900
99%
265,332,500
94%
6,600,000
6,558,000
99%
6,333,900
97% .
160,035,800
79,900,300
50%
58,888,900
74%
42,000,000
12,200,000
29%
4,392,000
36%
13,000,000
13,000,000
100%
13,000,000
100%
695,000
386,700
56%
385,200
99%
10,693,200
528,700
5%
332,700
63%
3,705,100
1,265,500
34%
1,152,900
91%
1,823,600
1,823,600
100%
1,823,600
100%
8,329,700
8,024,800
96%
5,775,800
72%
104,700
104,700
100%
95,200
91%
Supplemental Care 333,500 333,500 100% 199,000 60%
Project Equal 1,000 1,000 100% 1,000 100%
TOTAL $814,587,100 $689,656,200 85% $630,270,600 91%
Source: 1994 Economic Impact, Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, NC.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-6 1

I-19.
D. EXISTING LAND USE
The 15A NCAC 7B planning requirements specify that existing land use shall be mapped and
analyzed, with particular attention given to:
— significant land and water use compatibility problems;
— major problems that have resulted from unplanned development, and that have
implications for future land and water use;
-- an identification of areas experiencing or likely to experience changes in
predominant land uses including agricultural and forestry land being converted to
other uses.
This section of the Land Use Plan responds to this requirement. In addition, the city's current
land use -related ordinances are reviewed and the effectiveness of the 1993 Land Use Plan policies
is assessed. (NOTE: Sufficient time has not passed to allow assessment of the 1996 policy
statements.
There are 16,999 total acres within the City of Havelock and an additional 14,453 acres included
within the city's extraterritorial jurisdiction. The city's acreage total includes the Cherry Point
Marine Corps Air Station. The land use acreages are summarized in Table 7, and depicted on the
Existing Land Use Map, Map 1.
Table 7
City of Havelock
1997 Existing Land Use
City of Havelock
ETJ
Category
Acreage
% of Total
Acrea e
o of Total
Residential
Single-family
2,539
14.9%
744
5.1%
j�
Multi -family
380
= 2.2 %
21
0.1 %
Military housing
1,366
8.0%
0
0.0%
Mobile homes
140
0.8 %
72
0.5 %
Q
Commercial and Services
390
2.3 %
121
0.8 %
Industrial
26
0.2 %
40
0.3 %
(-j
Government and Institutional
286
1.7 %
80
0.6 %
(�
Cultural, Entertainment, and Recreation
253
1.5 %
31
0.2 %
Transportation, Communications, and Utilities
685
4.0 %
N/A'
--
Croatan National Forest
0
0.0 %
3,397
23.5 %
Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station3
10,640Z
62.7 %
8,708
60.3 %
a
Vacant
Total
294
16,999
1.7 0
100.0%
1,239
14,453
8.6 0
100.0%
' N/A = not available. s Excluding military housing. 3 Data including a breakdown
of land use and
acreage at Cherry Point MCAS is not available.
Source: Holland Consulting Planners, Inc.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-7 '

CITY OF HAVELOCK
NORTH CAROLINA
EXISTING LAND USE
MAP 1
mlmv "v�"m WATERSHED BOUNDARIES
0K.W'AWAND'AlW�0 CITY LIMITS
EXTRATERRITORIAL LINE
SINGLE-FAMILY
-'"'s.�' %: • MULTI -FAMILY
MOBILE HOMES
MILITARY HOUSING
COMMERCIAL & SERVICES
INDUSTRIAL .
•�•�••••.•. GOVERNMENT, INSTITUTIONAL
• • • ' & RECREATION
CULTURAL, ENTERTAINMENT
& RECREATION
e a o e "s • CROATAN NATIONAL FOREST
as '0 a°4 4
VACANT
(exd. MCAS Cherry Point)

I-21.
In terms of acreage, the dominant land use within the City of Havelock is the Cherry Point Marine
Corps Air Station. Residential land use constitutes the largest non-military land use. Within the
ETJ, the largest land use is the Croatan National Forest. Within the city's planning jurisdiction,
the composition and distribution of land uses have been strongly influenced by the Cherry Point
Marine Corps Air Station. Since the 1995 Base Realignment and Closure Commission decision,
the Department of the Navy has been charged with developing an Environmental Impact Statement
determining the feasibility of five separate F/A-18 squadron relocation scenarios. Two of the
scenarios evaluate the feasibility of locating squadrons to Marine Corps Air Station -Cherry Point.
Recent City of Havelock capital project and programming initiatives have resulted in providing
the necessary infrastructure and service levels to accommodate future expansion at Marine Corps
Air Station -Cherry Point. Further, these efforts have prepared the community to meet or exceed
the demands of expansion beyond those anticipated as a result of the implementation of either
Alterative Realignment Scenario Three or Alternative Realignment Scenario Five of the
Department of the Navy's Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) and Draft Clean Air Act
(CAA) Conformity Determination evaluating the realignment of F/A-18 aircraft and operational
functions from Naval Air Station (NAS) Cecil Field, Florida, to other Navy and Marine Corps
Air Stations on the east coast of the United States. Therefore, discussions concerning the F/A-18
Hornet jets in terms of land use issues, population projections, and infrastructure demands remain
relevant as a high growth scenario and have been left in this edition of the Land Use Plan.
RESIDENTIAL
In 1990, there were 6,072 dwelling units located within the City of Havelock. These included:
4,362 single-family site built structures, 479 mobile homes, and 1,231 multi -family dwelling
units. From 1990 to 1997, a total of 320 single-family building permits and 325 multi -family
building permits were issued. Thus, by - 1997 the dwelling unit total had reached approximately
6,717, a seven-year increase of 10.6%.
From 1987 to 1993, the majority of the city's residential construction has occurred in its eastern
areas along McCotter and Hollywood Boulevards and in the South Forest and Foxcroft
subdivisions. Since 1993, the residential construction has increased west of Havelock, including
Tucker Creek Estates. These areas are generally located on the existing land use map.
Since 1990, a total of 425 lots included in four major subdivisions have been approved for
development. These included the following:
1991 Mar-Stal Apartment Section III - 26 lots
1992 Village Park II - 22 lots
1995 Hills of Foxcroft Section III - 40 lots
1995 Christopher Downs Phase I - 16 lots
1995 Tyler Place - 60 lots
1995 Mar Beth - 50 lots
1995 Stone Bridge Landing - 19 lots
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-9 1

1995 Church Road - 16 lots
1996/7 Coley Wallace Subdivision - 2 lots
Hills of Foxcroft, Section 3, Phase 2 - 20 lots
Christopher Downs, Phase 2 - 33 lots
Tucker Creek Estates, Section 1 - 52 lots
Bonnie Boyd Subdivision - 3 lots
1998 Tucker Creek Estates, Section 2A - 31 lots
Tucker Creek Estates, Section 2B - 35 lots
Because of the uncertainty surrounding the expansion of the Marine Corps Air Station, residential
construction activity had slowed during the mid-1990's. However, from 1995 to 1997,
construction was accelerated.
Mobile homes comprise a large portion of the city's housing inventory and acreage. In 1997,
there were approximately 479 mobile homes located on 97 acres. Many of these units provide
lower cost housing for military personnel and are expected to continue. to comprise a large
percentage of the housing inventory.
The City of Havelock received a 1995 Community Development Block Grant of $250,000 to assist
in the construction of Tyler Place, which is intended to provide housing for tenant households with
less than 60 % median county income. The total cost for the project was approximately $3.2
million. Tyler Place is located on a 6.7 acre site located just south of Highway 70 on the west
side of SSR 1756 (Lake Road). A total of seven individual buildings are included. This project
will be a significant help in meeting the housing needs of Havelock's low to moderate income
population.
Because of the location of the Croatan National Forest south and southwest of the city, it is
expected -that residential development will increasingly spread to the north and northwest along
the U.S. 70 corridor. This will stimulate a demand for the extension of city utilities. In addition,
this may stimulate annexation and expansion of the city's ETJ. If Cherry Point Marine Corps Air
Station is expanded to accommodate the 140 F/A-18 Hornet jets from Cecil Field, the impact on
residential development and the associated demand for standard affordable housing will be
substantial.
I-22.
2. COMMERCIAL AND SERVICES
The commercial and services land use category within the city includes 390 acres of land. From
1987 to 1993, this land use category only increased 18 acres. Since 1993, approximately 34 acres
have been added.
The city's commercial and service land uses are primarily stretched out along U.S. 70 through
most of Havelock. There is not a traditional compact central business district. This configuration
encourages vehicular traffic and adds to congestion along U.S. 70. A secondary area of
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-10 ,

commercial land use has developed at the N.C. 101/McCotter Boulevard intersection and is
spreading along portions of McCotter Boulevard.
a In past Land Use Plans, concern has been expressed over revitalization of the ci 's commercial
P P t1'
areas. As the age of the commercial structures increases and buildings deteriorate, redevelopment
will continue to be an issue. There is very little vacant land located along the U.S. 70 corridor.
Thus, new businesses desiring to locate in Havelock will be encouraged to acquire developed
properties and either renovate existing structures or replace them with new structures.
Within the citys northwest ETJ, there has been very little commercial development. It is
expected to change as growth continues. Commercial development of the U.S. 70 corridor north
of the city will be encouraged by the lack of vacant property within the city suitable for
commercial development.
I-22.
3. INDUSTRIAL
Within the City of Havelock, there are only 26 acres of industrial land use. The privately
developed Havelock Industrial Park is located east of Havelock adjacent to N.C. 101. The 80 acre
a park has two developed parcels, leaving approximately 72 acres available for development. In.
the early 1990's, there were water pressure problems in the park. The city corrected these
problems by securing a community development economic development grant in 1994 which
funded the construction of a 400,000 gallon elevated water tank off N.C. 101 to serve the park.
Within the ETJ, there are approximately 40 acres of industrial property. This property is located
Qon one site west of Havelock and adjacent to S.R. 1756.
The Craven County Economic Development Commission and Havelock Regional Development
Corporation are actively and aggressively recruiting new industry. It is expected that this effort
will yield results. Care should be taken to protect the park from conflicting land uses. Expansion
of the city's industrial base is important to decreasing economic dependency on the Cherry Point
QMarine Corps Air Station.
I-23.
4. GOVERNMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL
The government and institutional category includes 185 acres. This category primarily includes
the City of Havelock property, Havelock Parks and Recreation office, and the Craven County
Board of Education property which includes seven school sites. (The Marine Corps Air Station
a property is categorized separately.) In April, 1998, the U.S. Postal Service announced the
construction of a new post office on the U.S. 70 West service road at the intersection with Timber
Drive. At the time of plan preparation, the City of Havelock was considering relocation of
planning and public works departments. Other than the need for replacement/renovation, there
were no significant problems associated with the government and institutional land use category.
aSection I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-11 ,
it

I-23.
7. TRANSPORTATION. COMMUNICATIONS. AND UTILITIES
This category includes street and utility rights -of -way necessary to the provision of
infrastructure and the interstate waterway which is an important economic asset for Craven County
and its municipalities. Within the city, there are approximately 685 acres included in this
category. The right-of-way acreage within the ETJ has not been defined. The major issues in this
category are:
— Implementation of the City of Havelock thoroughfare plan.
-- Construction of bridges over Slocum Creek on both the east and west access roads
along Highway 70. (1)
-- Cunningham Boulevard extension. (2)
-- Extension of Greenfield Heights Boulevard. (3)
-- Construction of a U.S. 70 City of Havelock bypass. (4)
-- Maintenance of the interstate waterway.
The locations of issues 1-4, identified in parenthesis above, are indicated on Map 2.
I-24.
10. BASINWIDE WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT (NEW SECTION)
The North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) has initiated a basinwide approach to
state water quality management. The overall goal of basinwide management is to develop
consistent and effective long range water quality management strategies that protect the quality
and intended uses of North Carolina's surface waters while accommodating population increases
and economic growth.
The State of North Carolina has been divided into seventeen major river basins. Eight of North
Carolina's major river basins cross the coastal area: Lumber, Cape Fear, White Oak, Neuse, Tar -
Pamlico, Roanoke, Chowan, and Pasquotank. The Division of Water Quality has further
subdivided these basins into smaller "sub -basins," which are currently used as the foundation for
their basinwide water quality plans. Even smaller watersheds were recently delineated for the
entire state by the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. These watersheds are referred
to as "14-digit hydrologic units" (because of the unique 14-digit code assigned to each watershed)
or simply "small watersheds." . These small watersheds generally range in size from 5,000 to
50,000 acres. For each river basin, water quality problems are identified and appropriate
management strategies developed. The plan features basinwide permitting of pollution discharges,
integration of existing point and non -point source control programs, and preparation of a
basinwide management plan report.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-12 1

,gas
N --'
00
3g N
c 0
a) 0 00+
O
^�. III IIIIII IIIII III III,
l.L IIIII
� � / : III II IIIIIII
N I Illl4lllllpllgllll,l.l
r� plppu� wl I IuIlPihVl1941�'
O 11I`� II IIIII IIIIIIIIIIII �I IIII II III qI lllpli 1.
III IIIII hill l l,l III II I
� CD i�� �iuhIdljjlllllll4V�llljlll1�,111PIIIiIV, I IIIIIII'.
IIII IIII Ipli4
� IIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
-(� N .III (IIIIIIII (IVII III I !III (IIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIII�IfI
5.0
NIdIIPllll II hN'
,� �, d,ll'IIIIIIII lllllplglllulplulp
i I I I II411II IjIulldlllulUIIIIIIIIVII'V III
ti Ivmr�fifll�llllll IIIIIIII'udIIPV Illjuil'hIIIII�mIIIIIduN9VIIIIIIuIIItlihIllllil h�
I IIIIII'( �Iljlil l!IilPllllll I I I it Vll hl II N II :
0' 7111 lldlllll hhl'tlIIIIIIIOVIiIIIIIhIIIIIIIVIIIVI IIIIIIVII(i�lllli'PIIIIIIIIIUIalllllillliillui4lrlll
(D w Lrl IIII iIVII11 VIhI VI
O I �VI 'll IIImIIV";' III IIII IIII IIIIIIIIhlppghp,hl III14VIli!plld �ul'Vhh'gl Ilupl�rl IIII IIIIIIIVgllllll'I Illdll'.
IgNI 11 IlPlllll 91111h II'{IpiUIIIIVI Iry IIP gllp n III
III Lg•I�III� Iljl I 'Vllllllllljll IIIIIII II'IV41I V'lll o. IIIII I j i IIII �'
II I II .'III IIIII jIIIjIIVIINI gidIIIIIII:, II IVIIVVIIII 41IIIiIG IIII Illjj;l
NlliiilllllVil!IIJry II IIIIpVldllllllll 'IlpjolVlpNl IVIdIII'I'I I''llllll'llll4l IIIIr� IlPllhl4° IIVIIIII�4 �'Illlllllllu II'lllu I �,
IIIIII dulPp'pllllul I Iljlupli; I:IiII1611I111 Illillyl: IIIII ipllll II II II I IIII I' li dlllol '�i��
�' �, � I III:: I I I i II I, I,j. I IIIIIIII I IIIIIIII: jell III I I IIII III'(''. IIIIIII II I I IIII I;.
�r� IIIIII IIII;IIVPi VVIIIIIIIIIIIIIUVI•„ IIIIIIiIIIlii4Vlll 14IIpIPPIII I�IIII�III�IUI IIIIIpj•Iq II�IIIpIIV IIIIIij'lll Illlllhlldl iUlh!. o'I
A W IIIII IIIIIIII I IIU III i I I Illllhl I. III I IIIII I ' I:I I IIIIIIII Ii1'll I 111 IIIIIIIIIuI IIPpllllll II II I L U II I
vv I IIIII Ilulllh Ilnl II
III 1111141 11141IIII II' .II Ilgryllill lnliil I Ihlll I I
IIII V I jllllll ll I l I II I IVI IIIII II IIIIIII NIIIII9I IIIIIIIdllll I IIIPI Illtlil Ilh '.II
i II I I IIII ,IIIIII IIII gllllid,Il�ll IIIII IIIVIII III'IIIIIIQ I lll41lllllll "h9!IIVIII I Vu IfIiIIIIIIIIV 4V IIIII
NIIII; 1pIVVlglll VllllIlllllll ! Ql IIII rl'''
II IuIIIIIIIIIIIglpiuullptll IIIIVo+uu10. +^u I r,'I;IiI J IIIII IIIIIIII III to qll
I � IIIII, I upllugtlll illllUl I IIIIII'Vhldllgl 011911 lull IIII' I Illil;gll
C G)' = III VJII I l,,ry!I'IV puIIJdIIIIIIIIIUIgIIVII i''I• II I I u I Iq'llllllllll''II; I Illlllllllh II I'lla'' Ilww IIIIIII, ctlllldlpl I
' "� III III'llll'illl Moll IIIrIVII III IIIIIII V�IIPI III I IIIIII"I. to Ili Il.lr'' III 'i
' N � �.� �� III III �.:��,IIIhgIIIIIIVIIVIII''''jII14dIIIIIIIIIIIPlll4llllllll� I III�I'idll, IIIIIII Illlilll�,i'IIIIIIIIiIlllllillllll II,W.;,• IIIIIIII:.
(D ql'; II III
I ~ _ �� IIIII P illlllijl'pli l l lil IIIII 'III IIIII IIII IIIIIIII}.4ViIIPI'I I IIII I II' IIII IIIIII a IIIII'�II�II IIIIIIIIIIV , I VII'IIIIIIIIIIIIgI 'lidli�
C7 '(7 pIIIbIVIQhuI'IIIIIIIIIIII Qpl blgllhll IIII,IIIIhNjq NIIIIVIII pl IIIVIIIIIIII VVllha;dhl'
CDplllllll IllllllllillIIItlIIllyluVlllllulllllli'til Illglll pl Illil
0 —� 5C°'I'I I I4lulllllp 11"VQlllh I IIIIIIIIIII1,4S' IIIIPIIIII II uJplllltll IIIIIIIVIIII ,,illulllllo Illtllll l 'lull hl Ililhlll
a I i I I I I' III III III II I ulllll'r Ilgllll;l
0 * IIIIII III IIIIIIIIIIV Illllillil IIIIII quVIIVIIPiI'illiluu IIII Illlij IIII ll'II IIII III
X. VI IIIQ I "''ol IIIII I,I,II III I IIIII.jll o.I, II "�IIII'�'VIIIIII��
�'T _ \C"�4 �,I lVllllh,l lu IIIVII PlulVllgltlll'I 11..I,II llld110111II v.lial I I!li.
O (D wi QIIII Idll II IIIIIP,I °41111I IIII ILlu ruf Illil spill ll
.I Y� IIIII;IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIV IIIII II III IIIIIIII III
Iglu ll I I IIII gill IIIII llnpl IIIII II IIIIII II I '� rI ll6 h IIII' �IIIIp II IIIII IIIII
(� � � I� II IIIIII IIIIII II; I II Ili IIIII II II III IVIII( III!
' _ ? .-� �til I IIIII Ip: glhll IIIIVIIVn IIIIII qQI l 111 IIIVIi��I III IIdP.l�ll'I IIIIII'.
III'l 'h1V IVIII(, I.III141 p'III"IIIIIIIPIVII II IIIII IIII II III II IIldfl 11114111tlIP IOIIIIIIIj IIo Il hll
N � IIII II VI I III I
gl
�a�A tlll II IIII IIIII II',lhlllV I u,
C7 -i Vv�� 4 PII,4IIII'lllllll' Ip I�:�I IIIII Illhl' IIIIIIIIII'll',I
(i �II+�,III�III,I�IIIII, �IIJ�,iIIlUIII,fRIIIIIPIIvIII?il�ll�ll�ljl�jl�
CD
R1 �
(D
BIZ
I I ' I� I , Iu.1. � u I� uo�l�l aul,plr I � IuININd
IIL.!II jrNl P In j I III; Ip�, .' � I
� 'll I'Vi,. a �lpl�lll I'IN�''l I hV 41 '' IIIII;, � IIpiVl�ll@f
II
y
a
Y-
j
01
�
o
(CD
rA
w
I
O
(D
...
��lil�ii!i� ll l I
�p��WVl�lll� IIIIIII
Ip'I��IIdViIII ��II p II ® �'IBrs
✓I � pI � I II u a I I al I I lnl 4�V!91 I In
d� I�IIIIN 11Ip Illlil�l l I IIJI �IIIiII WLI� IIIiIIIIhIjgllti�N lid l 'I�q IIgtlJ�Jr�l �IilllllI`ulV,I�;
pI Ili„.�� INiI���II�p.��IlIpIIIIII� IhIPf IIIItl�IIIlIIIIIII,alrl lay�IVIII ' I'I IplJrfII IIIIII~jJ�Ill�l
IGI' I;IIVIIV I IIIIIII�ItlIGI'�ubli18NpIllIIIIII��UU�'
I��IIu
SOMME
all
II���..rrlrwrMmnunmuura+�mwaq
F'
r
LAW
NNM
t III,(
rm�. r ,�'► �� ``■■efe "'� I I. I'' I IIII . I' i1 II ; � �� �I�I�I. •
pip? Al
fh'N+IIIIII G N�u I�f,
�' .i ,I�,. �.1`.p��p► � d� „II ����k� ���� II I � n I ! I I' I I I,IyIIIIIi
''..iWii+''��• �II�r .I ,n,, Ih nil �4 � �'ti �,e��" I w I �I`III • pIIIII�tlHI� �'
'�. ~(�'� l i 111 III •
,� � ,, ��� mpN���nml , .IIII, II i •
�V
� � G '► ' I ICI IIIIII li •
I it �II jl
I IIII I
� 9II!�iGl 'I
II 'I� III
s'

I
'J
I
I
I
11
I
I
I
I
0
The purpose of the basinwide management plan is to communicate to policy makers; the regulated
community, and the general public, the state's rationale, approaches, and long-term strategies for
each basin. Preparation of a basinwide management plan is a five year process. In general, this
process involves the following five major phases of development:
-- Collecting pertinent water quality and related information,
-- Analyzing the information and targeting problem areas,
-- Developing management strategies,
-- Circulating a draft plan for public review and comment, and
-- Finalizing the plan.
Craven County is located in the Neuse, Tar -Pamlico, and White Oak river basins. All of the
Havelock planning jurisdiction is located in the Neuse River Basin. The majority of the county
is located in the Neuse River basin as well. The Tar -Pamlico and White Oak Basinwide
Management Plans received NCDWQ approval in 1994 and January, 1997, respectively. The
Neuse plan was approved in March, 1993, but the plan was undergoing revision in 1997.
North Carolina has adopted a "basinwide" approach to water quality management. Basinwide
management plans are created for each of the major river basins within the state; these plans are
updated every five years. Each river basin plan summarizes information from a wide variety of
sources -surface water quality measurements, fish samples, and point source discharge records -to
assess the quality of fresh and estuarine surface waters of the state. Through the basinwide
planning process, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) identifies water quality problems, and
where possible, the degradation or pollution source.
Few local governments have the resources to conduct significant water quality monitoring and
analysis programs. Basinwide plans can be a useful source of information for use in county and
local land use planning. They provide descriptions of the water quality problems that are found
within the basin, along with a comprehensive list of state and federal programs which can assist
in resolving those problems. Because basinwide plans comprehensively assess water quality issues
by river basin, they provide local governments a context for local water quality problems. The
relative contribution of pollution sources -point versus non -point sources, local versus upstream -is
more easily understood within the context of the entire river basin. For instance, although point
sources are a visible pollution source, non -point sources such as sedimentation and nutrients in
surface runoff are typically a greater water quality problem in coastal North Carolina. A better.
understanding of this mix of sources within the local watershed allows a more efficient use of local
efforts and funds in addressing water quality concerns. Since the basinwide plans are the basis
for DWQ's decisions, they provide local governments with an indication of future Division of
Water Quality actions on local issues, such as the expansion of a municipal waste water treatment
plant.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-14 '
0

In Craven County, the Natural Resource and Conservation Service has identified two watersheds
within the Tar -Pamlico Basin, three in the White Oak Basin, and 35 watersheds. within the Neuse
Basin. Each watershed has been assigned a fourteen -digit code for the purpose of identification.
The following table identifies the watersheds located in Havelock's planning jurisdiction.
% of City in
% of Watershed
River.
DWQ
Watersheds
Watershed
Occupied by City
Basin
Subbasin
03020204050010
1.83
1.75
Neuse
03-04-10
03020204050020
73.37
24.01
Neuse
03-04-10
03020204050030
24.80
13.48
Neuse
03-04-10
The watersheds within Havelock's planning jurisdiction are delineated on Map 1, Existing Land
use. The following provides names for each numerically referenced watershed.
03020204050010 Tucker Creek, Neuse River
03020204050020 East, Southwest Prongs
03020204050030 Hancock Creek, Neuse River
I-24.
10. EXISTING ORDINANCES AND LAND USE CONTROLS
The City of Havelock has maintained a "conservative" approach to Land Use Planning and
regulations. The city supports planning through a full-time planning staff and active planning
board. The patterns of past and future development are greatly influenced by the Marine Corps
Air Station. Decisions regarding the expansion of the base have caused the residential market to
strengthen due to the influx of Marine personnel. These impacts are caused by the federal
government. The City of Havelock has no say in the development and/or growth of the base.
However, it should be noted that the city fully and wholeheartedly supports the expansion of the
facility.
The following provides a summary of the city's land use -related codes and ordinances.
(NEW SECTION)
City of Havelock Zoning Ordinance
The City of Havelock has a comprehensive zoning ordinance which regulates land use within the
city and its extraterritorial jurisdiction. It is enforced by the city's Director of Inspections or a
designated administrative officer. The ordinance includes seven residential zoning districts, two
commercial districts, two industrial districts, and an agricultural zoning district. The ordinance
was undergoing a complete rewrite during 1997-98.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-15 1

I
a I41.
F. DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINTS: LAND SUITABILITY
7. MANMADE HAZARDS
Within Havelock, the primary manmade hazards are the Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station
and the Atlantic and East Carolina Railroad which serves the county. This railroad often provides
a the transport of toxic and hazardous materials, such as jet fuel, through Havelock to the North
Carolina State Port at Morehead City.
a
I
11
a
11
it
I
I
I
Title III of the Federal Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA Title III) included
requirements for emergency planning, emergency notification, and chemical reporting.
Specifically, this 1986 legislation was entitled the Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -
Know Act (also referred to as EPCRA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has
developed regulations corresponding to the EPCRA Congressional legislation. The regulations
include six distinct reporting or notification requirements that may impact facilities.
One section of the EPA regulations requires that facilities report certain chemical substances
located on site. Specifically, under this regulatory requirement, facilities with chemicals on the
EPA's list of Extremely Hazardous Substances present in a quantity equal to or in excess of their
established Threshold Planning Quantity or a 500-pound threshold (whichever number is less), as
well as any hazardous chemical present on site in a quantity equal or greater to 10,000 pounds
must be included on an annual report called the Tier II. This report must be submitted by March
1 of each year to the North Carolina Emergency Response Commission, the local Emergency
Planning Committee, and the local fire department with jurisdiction over the reporting facility.
The information reported on the Tier II report includes, but is not limited to, the chemical name
or common.name.of each chemical subject to reporting, the maximum amount of the chemical
present at any time during the preceding calendar year, a description of how the chemical is
stored, the location of the chemical at the facility, emergency contacts, and categories of hazards
including (1) immediate (acute) health hazard, (2) delayed (chronic) health hazard, (3) fire hazard,
(4) sudden release of pressure hazard, and (5) reactive hazard. The following table identifies the
Havelock Tier II reporters:
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-16 1

Table 8 (NEW TABLE)
City of Havelock
Tier H Reporters, 1995
Facility
Address
Etna
1234 Main Street
Havelock, NC 28532
East Havelock Fuel Market
107 E. Main Street
Havelock, NC 28532
Gant Store # 11
807 E. Main Street
Havelock, NC 28532
Gant Store #18
Highway 70 West
Havelock, NC 28532
G and H Texaco
Route 2
Havelock, NC 28532
Handy Mart #9
508 E. Main Street
Havelock, NC 28532
Handy Mart #24
211 W. Main Street
Havelock, NC 28532
Joe's Texaco
Hwy. 70 E
Havelock, NC 28532
Scotchman #190
510 Hwy. 101
Havelock, NC 28530
Source: Division of Emergency Management, 1995
I-44.
8. FRAGILE AREAS
Fragile areas are areas which could easily be damaged or destroyed by inappropriate, unplanned,
or poorly planned development. These areas include both Areas of Environmental Concern
(AEC's) and other natural resource fragile areas, as shown on Map 3. The following discusses
each type of area in detail.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-17 1

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
e �o
0
C
0
CHERRY POINT
NEUSE RIVER
z
0
0
J
THE PREPARATION OF THIS MAP WAS
FINANCED IN PART THROUGH A GRANT
PROVIDED BY THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, THROUGH FUNDS
PROVIDED BY THE COASTAL ZONE
MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1972, AS AMENDED,
WHICH IS ADMINISTERED BY THE OFFICE OF
OCEAN AND COASTAL RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND
ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION.
scale
o c
0 N cn
Feet
CITY OF HAVELOCK
NORTH CAROLINA
AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN
AND OTHER FRAGILE AREAS
MAP 3
LEGEND
See Note 4
404 WETLAND AREAS
' See Note 3
COASTAL WETLANDS
See Note 1
ESTUARINE WATERS
See Note 2
ESTUARINE SHORELINE
See Note 1
PUBLIC TRUST AREAS
INLAND PRIMARY NURSERY AREAS
® NATURAL HERITAGE PRIORITY AREAS
NOTES
1. ALL WATERS UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE
CITY OF HAVELOCK ARE EITHER ESTUARINE
Q WATERS OR PUBLIC TRUST AREAS AS DEFINED
IN 15A NCAC 7H.0206 ESTUARINE WATERS AND
.0207 PUBLIC TRUST AREAS.
2. ALLAREAS LYING 0-75' LANDWARD OFTHE MEAN
HIGH WATER LEVEL OF ESTUARINE WATERS ARE
CLASSIFIED AS ESTUARINE SHORELINES.
BECAUSE OF MAP SCALE. THESEAREAS CANNOT
BE ACCURATELY MAPPED. PRECISE LOCATIONS
MUST BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD THROUGH
CAMA REVIEW AND PERMIT APPROVAL.
3. COASTAL WETLAND AREAS EXIST IN THE CITY
OF HAVELOCK. BECAUSE OF MAP SCALE.
COASTAL WETLAND AREAS MUST BE
DETERMINED THROUGH ON -SITE ANALYSIS.
4. 404 JURISDICTION DETERMINATIONS CAN ONLY
BE MADE BY CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERSONNEL
THROUGH INDIVIDUAL ON -SITE ANALYSIS.
5

I44.
L Natural Resource Fragile Areas
Natural resource fragile areas are generally recognized to be of educational, scientific, or
cultural value because of the natural features of the particular site. Features in these areas serve
to distinguish them from the vast majority of the landscape.
These areas include complex natural areas, areas that sustain remnant species, pocosins,
wooded swamps, prime wildlife habitats, or registered natural landmarks. Havelock's planning
jurisdiction includes both regional and state natural heritage priority areas. Havelock's natural
heritage priority areas are located in the Croatan National Forest and in the hardwood swamps of
Slocum and Hancock Creeks.
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program of the Division of Parks and Recreation
works to identify and facilitate protection of the most ecologically significant natural areas
remaining in the state. Natural areas may be identified because they provide important habitats
for rare species or because they contain outstanding examples of the rich natural diversity of this
state.
Natural area inventories are often conducted county by county. Permission from
landowners is obtained before field work is undertaken. The information collected is important
for Land Use Planning, especially planning for natural area conservation and greenways. High
quality natural areas are valuable resources that make North Carolina and its counties attractive
to live in and to visit. In addition to their educational and cultural uses, natural areas are
ri important reservoirs of native plants and animals and are key resources for recreation.
Among coastal counties, preliminary natural area inventories were completed for ten
counties during 1980-82. These inventories were conducted for Brunswick, Carteret, Craven,
Dare, Gates, Hyde, Pamlico, Pender, Tyrrell, and Washington counties under the Coastal Energy
Impact Program of Coastal Management. More thorough inventories were conducted for the
northeastern coastal counties as part of the Albemarle -Pamlico Estuarine Study during 1989-1993.
In 1995, a much more in-depth survey was conducted for Brunswick County; a similar inventory
is currently underway for Onslow County.
These inventories are funded with grants from the Natural Heritage Trust Fund which are
used to match local funding. The inventories generally take 18-24 months to complete and cost
approximately $30,000. CAMA planning grants may be considered for part of the local match.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-19 1

I-46.
g. Marine Resources
Slocum Creek is an inland primary nursery area. In addition, the upper reaches of Slocum
Creek and some of the creek's tributaries are anadromous fish spawning areas. An anadromous
fish is defined as one which migrates upriver from the sea to breed in freshwater.
- The North Carolina Division of Water Quality assigns quality classifications to all waters
of the State of North Carolina. The schedule of classifications for Havelock is provided by 15
NCAA 2B. The classifications are based upon existing or contemplated best usage of the various
streams and segments of streams within a basin, as determined through studies, evaluations, and
comments received at public hearings. The state classifies tidal salt waters as follows:
Class SA: shell fishing for market purposes and any other usage specified by
the "SB" and "SC" classification;
Class SB: primary recreation and any other usage specified by the "SC"
classification;
Class SC: aquatic life propagation and survival, fishing, wildlife, and
secondary recreation;
Swamp Waters: (Sw) Waters which have low velocities and other natural
characteristics which are different from adjacent streams;
Within Havelock's jurisdiction the waters of the Neuse River are classified as SB. The
waters of Hancock Creek and its tributaries are classified as SC. Two areas in the extreme upper
end of Slocum Creek are classified C. The remaining waters of Slocum Creek and its tributaries
are classified SC. Map 4 provides a general delineation of the water classifications. The written
descriptions provided by 15 NCAC 2B must be relied upon for specific locations.
Surface waters (streams, lakes or estuaries) are related as either supporting (S), support -
threatened (ST), partially supporting (PS), or non -supporting (NS). These terms refer to whether
the classified uses of the water (such as water supply, aquatic life protection, and swimming) are
being fully supported, partially supported, or are not supported. If the waters were impacted to
the points that even swimming were disallowed, the waters would be rated as non -supporting.
Streams rated as either partially supporting or non -supporting are considered impaired. The
support -threatened category for freshwater rivers and streams refers to those waters classified as
good -fair based on water quality data, in contrast to excellent or good which are considered fully
supporting. An overall fully supporting rating, however, does include both fully supporting and
support threatened waters. Streams which had no data to determine their use support are listed
as non -evaluated (NE). Except for some tributaries, all waters of the Neuse River and Slocum
and Hancock Creeks are support -threatened and nutrient sensitive waters.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-20 1

n
SB
"-AreQUSE S B
I �
11007
1196
S �
.3 FAP.6
�Jt 1
r
1 too
L1s
l.b _
fl
SA
SCALE IN MILES
0 1 2
THE PREPARATION OF THIS MAP WAS
FINANCED IN PART THROUGH A GRANT
PROVIDED BY THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, THROUGH FUNDS
PROVIDED BY THE COASTAL ZONE
MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1972, AS AMENDED,
WHICH IS ADMINISTERED BY THE OFFICE OF
OCEAN AND COASTAL RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND
ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION.
CITY OF HAVELOCK
NORTH CAROLINA
WATER CLASSIFICATIONS
ESTUARINE EROSION AREAS
MAP 4
LEGEND
CORPORATE LIMIT LINE
EXTRATERRITORIAL LINE
SA
CLASS SA WATERS
SB
CLASS SB WATERS
SC
CLASS SC WATERS
C
CLASS C WATERS
NSW
NUTRIENT SENSITIVE WATERS
3
REACH 3/EROSION AREA
4
REACH 4/EROSION AREA
NOTE:
A DESCRIPTION OF WATER CLASSIFICATIONS
HAS BEEN PROVIDED ON PAGE 1-20.
I-21

In addition, the state has supplemental classifications to the primary classifications. The
supplemental classifications include: outstanding resource waters, trout waters, nutrient sensitive
waters (NSW), swamp waters, and future water supply. All waters within Havelock's planning
jurisdiction are classified as nutrient sensitive waters. These are waters which need additional
nutrient management due to their being subject to excessive growth of microscopic and
macroscopic vegetation. Within these waters, no increase of nutrients over, background levels
shall be permitted. However, domestic and industrial wastewater discharges are allowed.
I47.
G. DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINTS: PUBLIC FACILITIES
4. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
The City of Havelock only handles yard trimmings, used furniture, and used appliances. A
contract was established with the Craven County landfill and a private hauler (ARS) to take care
of all other solid waste. The city deposits the furniture and appliances at a transfer station
between Havelock and New Bem, and deposits the yard trimmings at a composting site in New
Bern.
Craven County is responsible for its own solid waste disposal. The county contracts with a private
firm for once per week curbside collection for the unincorporated and small incorporated areas.
Although the county's landfill at Tuscarora is not scheduled to reach its physical capacity for
several years, the landfill was officially closed in October, 1993. This was a Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) imposed deadline after which there would be substantial
liability for solid waste dumped at that site. The interim regional landfill, which is physically
adjacent to the Tuscarora location, will be utilized by Pamlico and Carteret counties as well as
Craven County, and will have a 4 to 5 year life expectancy. During the planning period, the
Coastal Regional Solid Waste Management Authority will expand the landfill, while continuing
to explore available options.
In FY93-94, the Coastal Regional Solid Waste Management Authority received no additional
monies in revenue bonds for operating costs. The $27 million received in FY92-93 was utilized
to help cover the cost of expanding the interim landfill. The Solid Waste Management Authority
is operating solely through collection fees.
From fiscal year 1991/1992 to fiscal year 1995/1996 the county's annual volume of waste
decreased from 86,549.01 to 60,277.04, a 41.75% decrease. This is probably attributable to
fluctuations in military personnel. Table 9 provides a summary of the data.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-22

Table 9 (NEW TABLE)
Craven County
Solid Waste Disposal, FY91-92 to FY95-96
MSW MSW Tons MSW Tons MSW Tons MSW Tons % Waste
Managed Disposed Disposed Disposed Disposed Reduction
County FY91-92 FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 FY95-96 FY95-96**
Craven 86,549.01 69,274.99 54,861.07 55,259.42 60,277.04 41.75%
(per capita) .94 .83 .65 .65 .70
* Craven County's base year is FY90-91, not FY91-92.
**Waste reduction formula (base year per capita minus current year per capita) divided by base year per capita.
Source: North Carolina 1994-1995 Solid Waste Annual Report, Division of Solid Waste Management.
Waste generated at MCAS Cherry Point is transported to the Craven County landfill and accounts
for approximately 9 percent of Craven County's total solid wastes.
I48.
5. TRANSPORTATION
a. Roads
Map 5 provides average daily traffic (ADT) counts compiled by the North Carolina
Department of Transportation for 1996 in Havelock. The map indicates that ADT volume on
U.S. 70 immediately north of the U.S. 70 and N.C. 101 intersection is the highest in Havelock's
planning area. An average of 34,900 cars traveled that section of the highway. This is higher
than the 1994 count of 33,400 for the same location. Other particularly high volume areas are
U.S. 70 south of the U.S. 70 and Cunningham Drive intersection (34,900), and U.S. 70 just south
of the U.S. 70 and Church Road intersection (26,700). The 1994 counts for these areas were
33,600 and 25,500 respectively. U.S. 70 is not only the main route between Havelock and New
Bern, but is also part of a major transportation corridor from the Atlantic Coast to Raleigh.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-23

-1
NEUSE
V" 'Qerry
906 1905 1� Point
�- .1910 \
1107 1196 O 1904 �r
1106 1�51907
Of01i�, .
184• .5 Pines 8
xk MARINE CORPS90
1
18 �
-5 `- .�17-6 i a��l� AIR STATION
3 FAP.a
f�f - 1163 70
t
j 1100
u `, e Q 1
Pine t+rA;
35,0 ,900
c HAVELOC
�0
< o
o
.00
l ,
1756
43
iL
1600 — 1656
1400 — 1497
THE PREPARATION OF THIS MAP WAS
y FINANCED IN PART THROUGH A GRANT
\` PROVIDED BY THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, THROUGH FUNDS
PROVIDED BY THE COASTAL ZONE
MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1972. AS AMENDED,
WHICH IS ADMINISTERED BY THE OFFICE OF
OCEAN AND COASTAL RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND
ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION.
i
CITY OF .HAVELOCK
NORTH CAROLINA
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES, 1996 .
MAP 5
LEGEND
CORPORATE LIMIT LINE
- EXTRATERRITORIAL LINE
SCALE
0 O t
I-24

I-50.
In addition, the 1998-2004 North Carolina Transportation Improvement Program included the
following improvements for the Havelock area (see Map 6):
U ROUTE/CITY LOCATION & DESCRIPTION
U.S. 70 Bypass Retain construction of the US 70 Bypass. However, relocate the
proposed alignment on the north end of Havelock to the east side of
u existing US 70 with an interchange to better serve Cherry Point.
0 SR 1756
Retain the extension of Greenfield Boulevard from Lake Road (SR
1756) to US 70.
SR 1735 Retain the Cunningham Boulevard (SR 1735) extension from US 70
to Belltown Road; construct a new urban, two-lane curb and gutter
section. Retain the Cunningham Boulevard extension from Belltown
Road to Lake Road (SR 1756).
US 70 West Service road extension across Slocum Creek.
SR 1775 Add an extension of service road SR 1775 to connect with Church
Street (SR 1774) increasing the connectivity of local routes in
Havelock.
aSection I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-25 1

THE PREPARATION OF THIS MAP WAS /
FINANCED IN PART THROUGH A GRANT
PROVIDED BY THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, THROUGH FUNDS
PROVIDED BY THE COASTAL ZONE
MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1972, AS AMENDED,
WHICH IS ADMINISTERED BY THE OFFICE OF
OCEAN AND COASTAL RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND
ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION.
Z
.l
r
r
A0
1
Hancock Creek
1
Mfg
alit
401.
led i. __. s r Lam._..<s _.: _.►
V
U.S.70
ais Mt K,m
MAP 6
CITY OF HAVELOCK
NORTH CAROLINA
RECOMMENDED
THOROUGHFARE PLAN
LEGEND
--CORPORATE LIMIT LINE
��■ EXTRATERRITORIAL LINE
EXISTING MAJOR THOROUGHFARES
�» EXISTING MINOR THOROUGHFARES
■�iiiiiiiiiiiiiiimmPROPOSED MAJOR THOROUGHFARE
PROPOSED INTERCHANGES
Scale
0
o
0
0 o Cp N 0
Feet I-26

I
I-51.
6. EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
Havelock schools are part of the Craven County school system. Enrollment in Havelock's schools
has shown an overall decrease of 1.4% from the 1991-92 school year as reported in the 1993 Land
Use Plan Update. Enrollment for the 1991-92 school year was 5,045 while the 1997-98 school
year shows a total enrollment of 4,366 pupils. Table 10 shows enrollment versus capacity at each
of Havelock's schools. The schools and other public facilities are delineated on Map 7.
Table 10
Havelock Schools
Enrollment vs. Capacity, 1997-1998
SCHOOL ' ENROLLMENT CAPACITY % OVERIUNDER
Arthur Edwards Elementary
W. Jesse Gurganus Elementary
Roger Bell Elementary
Havelock Middle School
Havelock High School
Havelock Elementary School
Graham Barden Elementary
Tucker Creek Middle School
Total
627
826
590
608
458
528
616
778
1,249
1,700
425
384
401
514
533
750
4,899
6,088
Source: Craven County Board of Education.
-31.7%
-3.0 %
-13.3 %
-20.8 %
-26.5 %
+ 10.7 %
-22.0 %
-40.7 %
-24.3 %
0 Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-27 1

THE PREPARATION OF THIS MAP WAS �l
FINANCED IN PART THROUGH A GRANT
PROVIDED BY THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, THROUGH FUNDS
PROVIDED BY THE COASTAL ZONE
MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1972• AS AMENDED,
WHICH IS ADMINISTERED BY THE OFFICE OF
OCEAN AND COASTAL RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND
ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION.
t
-i
y
�,y a
Q
Hancock Creek
CHERRY POINT
2.A
CITY OF HAVELOCK
NORTH CAROLINA
l�i.li I�u►,
PUBLIC-:.-
..
LEGEND
CORPORATE LIMIT LINE
_ EXTRATERRITORIAL LINE
CHERRY POINT MAIN GATE
.CRAVEN COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT.
• MUNICIPAL COMPLEX
— City Hall (Hatteras Ave.)
- Public Works (Governmental Ave.)
— Public Safety (Cunningham Dr.)
■ TOWNSHIP SIX VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT
HAVELOCK CITY SCHOOLS
1. Roger R. Bell Elementary School
2. Havelock High School
3. Havelock Middle School
4. Havelock Elementary School
5. Graham A. Barden Elementary School
6. Arthur W. Edwards Elementary School
7. W. Jesse Gurganus Elementary School
8. Tucker Creek Middle School
Scale
�
o 0
o �. N ►7
Feet
I-28

I
I-53.
(� 7. RECREATIONAL FACILITIES
U
The City of Havelock Parks and Recreation Department is staffed with a full-time director,
program coordinator, and two attendance personnel. In addition to the various recreation
(j facilities, the city maintains a 50-acre recreation complex. The following table lists the
recreational sites and facilities used by the City of Havelock Parks and Recreation Department.
I
0 Site
Table 11
Recreation Sites/Facilities Used
By the City of Havelock Parks and Recreation
Facilities
Recreation Complex (about 50 acres)
2 concession stands w/restrooms
8 ball fields (7 lighted)
1 football/soccer field - lighted
3 tennis courts - lighted
Picnic shelter
Storage building
21 station exercise trail
Play apparatus (whirl, spring animals, & swings)
Recreation Center (about 5 acres)
Multi -purpose building with basketball court and
game area
Concession stand
4 backstops
Play apparatus (swings, whirl, arch climber,
horizontal climber)
City Park (about 10 acres)
2 picnic shelters
Covered stage
Play apparatus (swings, twirl -about, wooden
climber, metal climber, spring animals, slide)
Restrooms
Walter B. Jones Park (about 12 acres)
Picnic shelter with restrooms
2 basketball courts - lighted
1 small ball field
9 station exercise trail
Play apparatus (swings, buck -about, whirl, slide,
spring animals)
Wooden structure with slide, platform, and
swings
Recreation Administration Office'
No facilities
Building (2.25 acres)
0 Section I: Analysis of
Conditions
I-29

Site
Tarheel Park (about 1.3 acres)
Sermons Park (about 3.3 acres)
Stonebridge (about 4.5 acres)
South Forest (about 2 acres)
Village Park (about 1 acre)
Quailridge (about 0.5 acres)
Wolf Creek (about 2.9 acres)
Bryan Blvd. (about 0.75 acres)
Manteo (about 10 acres leased from
Cherry Point)
Fox Croft
Facilities
1 basketball goal
Wooden structure with slide, platform, and
swings
1 basketball goal
Play apparatus (swings, teeter totters, climber,
whirl)
700 foot walkway
Small fishing pier
Wooden structure with slide, platform, and swing
Not developed
Not developed
Not developed
4 picnic areas
1 concession stand with restrooms
2 baseball fields
1 soccer field
No facilities
In addition to the above -listed facilities, there are a number of private recreation facilities which
consist of playgrounds, picnic shelters/areas, and swimming pools.
I-54.
8. POLICE DEPARTMENT (NEW SECTION)
The City of Havelock provides 24-hour police, fire, and EMS protection. The Police Department
staffs 23 full-time sworn officers which are assigned to the Patrol Division, Investigation Division,
Community Service Division, and Administration Services. In addition, there are nine part-time
officers with full arrest powers, six full-time civilian employees assigned to records,
communications, and animal control, and four part-time civilian employees assigned to
communications and animal control.
9. FIRE/RESCUE DEPARTMENT (NEW SECTION)
The Fire and Rescue Department staffs 5 full-time paid firefighters. Four of these employees are
trained EMT -I and one is a certified Fire Inspector. There are approximately 39 volunteer
firefighters and 36 volunteer rescue workers. Ten of these rescue volunteers are certified EMT -I
and the remaining eleven are EMT certified.
Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-30

I-55.
9. HEALTH SERVICES
All hospital needs are treated at Craven Regional Medical Center in New Bem, approximately 15
miles away. This is an acute -care facility that provides adequate major health care services to
(� Craven County residents. The 314-bed facility is staffed with approximately 1,400 full and part-
time employees. An expansion of the hospital to include the addition of an endoscopy facility,
an administration facility, and a floor for nursing care was completed in 1996. These additions
will not increase staff or bed capacity; however, they will allow for sections to be moved and
renovated.
{� Naval Hospital Cherry Point is also a significant major medical provider for the Havelock area.
U On October 1, 1994, a new three-story, 201,000 square foot structure was dedicated as the new
Naval Hospital Cherry Point. This facility is equipped with several outpatient clinics, 23 beds for
inpatients, a state-of-the-art emergency room, and a family practice clinic. It employs 452
persons, 110 of whom are civilians, 75 of whom are military officers, and contracts several
important services to private consultants. In addition to its modem medical equipment and
facilities, the hospital generates its own steam and contains emergency generators and food stores.
In the event of a disaster, this enables the hospital to be self-sufficient for up to two weeks.
(1 In addition, there are private medical clinics and physicians operating within the city. These
j facilities include East Carolina Internal Medicine, Coastal Children's Clinic, and Pinnacle Health
Care. The nursing home facility, operated by Britthaven, has recently been awarded fifty
additional beds.
I-55.
�1 12. CABLE TELEVISION SERVICE
u Cable television service is provided to residents of Havelock by Time Warner Cable, Inc., of
Newport. There are currently 2,700 customers. Cherry Point base residents are provided cable
service by Time Warner Cable. There are currently 3,300 subscribers on the base.
10
0
C
r
0 Section I: Analysis of Existing Conditions I-31 1

aSECTION II: PROJECTED LAND DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS (H-1)*
U II-1.
A. PROJECTED DEMAND FOR DEVELOPMENT
�j 1. DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS
n The City of Havelock 1993 CAMA Land Use Plan Update indicated a population increase to
u 23,820 by the year 2000. In 1995, North Carolina Office of State Planning population estimates
indicated an increase in population from 20,300 in 1990 to 21,042 in 1995. However, the state's
forecast, with no base loading, indicated a decrease to 19,783 by 2000 and 19,520 by 2005.
Concurrent with the preparation of the 1993 Land Use Plan, the 1993 Base Closure and
Realignment Commission (BRAC) recommended that approximately 168 Navy F/A 18 Hornet jets
be relocated from Cecil Field, Florida, to Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station. Subsequently,
in the spring of 1995, this number was reduced to approximately 140 jets. In July, 1995, the Base
Realignment and Closure Commission announced that the F/A 18 Hornet jets from Cecil Field,
Florida, would not be relocated to Cherry Point. However, local government supports future
expansion of the base and anticipates that during the planning period other additional personnel
will be coming to Cherry Point. Therefore, discussions concerning the F/A 18 Hornet jets in
terms of land use issues, population projections, and infrastructure demands remain relevant as
a high growth scenario and have been left in this edition of the Land Use Plan.
In addition, the Naval Aviation Depot (NADEP) was expected to increase its personnel as the
result of the realignment of workload from the Alameda, California; Pensacola, Florida; and
Norfolk, Virginia, NADEP's. The 1993 Land Use Plan recognized this potential growth in
military/civilian personnel, but did not include it in the population forecasts or the demand
capacity analysis.
This Land Use Plan update has been undertaken to reflect the impact of any personnel/operations
activity increase at the Air Station. However, because the level of growth was uncertain at the
time of plan preparation, three population forecast scenarios were developed. These included:
(1) no additional Cherry Point Marine Corp Air Station personnel, (2) a low growth scenario
resulting from the addition of 2,400 NADEP-related civilian personnel and dependents, and (3)
a high growth scenario resulting from the addition of 12,000 military personnel and dependents
associated with the relocation of F/A 18 Hornet jets to Cherry Point. The three population
forecasts for Craven County, each township, and each municipality are included in Tables 12
through 14. Based on the current distribution of Cherry Point military and civilian personnel, it
was estimated that 75 % of all military personnel and dependents and 50 % of all civilian and
secondary job population would reside in Craven County. Based on current living patterns, the
personnel/dependents were distributed within the county as follows: Township 6 - 50 %, Township
#8 - 20 %, Township #7 - 15 %, Township #5 - 10 %, and Township #2 - 5 %.
* Correction to the 1996 City of Havelock Land Use Plan.
Section II: Projected Land Development Analysis 11-1 1

Table 12
Total Year -Round Population and Percentage Change by Township and Municipality
Craven County, 1995-2005
No
Base Loading
Percentage Change
% Change
Township
Municipality or Area
1995
2000
2005'
1995-2000
2000-2005
1995-2005
Township 1
Vanceboro
1,015
1,068
1,131
5.2%
5.8%
11.4%
Unincorporated Areas
4,891
5,147
5,226
5.2%
1.5%
6.8%
Total Township
5,906
6,215
6,357
5.2%
2.3%
7.6%
Township 2
Bridgeton
516
505
508
-2.1 %
0.7%
-1.5%
Unincorporated Areas
6,221
6,512
6,838
4.7%
5.0%
9.9%
Total Township
6,737
7,017
7,346
4.2%
4.7%
9.0%
Township 3
Cove City
569
520
531
-8.6%
2.2%
-6.7%
Dover
458
437
430
-4.6%
-1.6%
-6.1 %
Unincorporated Areas
2,307
2,404
2,366
4.2%
-1.6%
2.6%
Total Township
3,334
3,361
3,328
0.8%
-1.0%
-0.2%
Township 5
Total Township
2,594
2,663
2,677
2.7%
0.5%
3.2%
Township 6
Havelock
21,042
19,783
19,520
-6.0%
-1.3%
-7.2%
Unincorporated Areas
3,553
5,001
5,097
40.8%
1.9%
43.5%
Total Township
24,595
24,784
24,617
0.8%
-0.7%
0.1%
Township 7
Total Township
6,870
7,121
7,244
3.7%
1.7%
5.4%
Township 8
New Bern
21,696
25,841
30,157
19.1%
16.7%
39.0%
River Bend
2,655
2,739
2,907
3.2%
6.1%
7.5%
Trent Woods
4,161
5,425
6,983
30.4%
28.7%
67.8%
Unincorporated Areas
4,829
6,225
6,005
28.9%
-3.5%
24.4%
Total Township
33,341 _
40,230
46,052
20.7%
14.5%
38.1%
Township 9
Total Township
2,454
2,564
2,617
4.5%
2.1%
6.6%
Total Municipalities 52,112 56,319 62,168 8.1 % 10.4% 19.3 %
Total Unincorporated Areas 33,704 37,636 38,069 11.7% 1.2% 13.0%
Total County 85,816 93,955 100,237 9.5% 6.7% 16.8%
Source: State Data Center; Holland Consulting Planners, Inc.
Section II: Projected Land Development Analysis II-2 '

Table 13
Projected Total Year -Round Population and Percentage Change by Township and Municipality
Craven County, 1995-2005
#1: 1994 Low Growth Base Loading
(1,200, or 50% of 2,400 total additional primary civilian job population + 2,125, or 50% of 4,250 total secondary [jobs] population.)
Total Year -Round Population
Percentage Change
% Change
Township
Municipality or Area
1995
2000
2005
1995-2000
2000-2005
1995-2005
Township 1
Vanceboro
1,015
1,068
1,131
5.2%
5.9%
11.4%
Unincorporated Areas
4,891
5,147
5,226
5.2%
1.5%
6.8%
Total Township
5,906
6,215
6,357
5.2%
2.3%
7.6%
Township 2
Bridgeton
516
517
520
0.2%
0.6%
0.8%
(5% of Military/Secondary)
Unincorporated Areas
6,221
6,666
6,992
7.1 %
4.9%
12.4%
Total Township
6,737
7,183
7,512
6.6%
4.6%
11.5%
Township 3
Cove City
569
520
532
-8.6%
2.2%
-6.5%
Dover
458
437
430
-4.6%
-1.6%
76.1%
Unincorporated Areas
2,307
2,404
2,366
4.2%
-1.6%
2.6%
Total Township
3,334
3,362
3,328
0.8%
-1.0%
-0.2%
Township 5
Total Township
2,594
2.996
3,010
15.5%
0.5%
16.0%
(10% of Military/Secondary)
Township 6
Havelock
21,042
21,112
20,849
0.3%
-1.2%
-0.9%
(50% of Military/Secondary)
Unincorporated Areas
3,553
5,334
5,430
50.1 %
1.8%
52.8%
Total Township
24,595
26,446
26,279
7.5%
-0.6%
6.8%
Township 7
Total Township
6,870
7,620
7,743
10.9%
1.6%
12.7%
(15% of Military/Secondary)
Township 8
New Bern
21,696
26,262
30,578
21.0%
16.4%
40.9%
(20% of Military/Secondary)
River Bend
2,655
2,787
2,955
5.0%
6.0%
11.3%
Trent Woods
4,161
5,508
7,066
32.4%
28.3%
69.8%
Unincorporated Areas
4,829
6,337
6,117
31.2%
-3.5%
26.7%
Total Township
33,341
40,894
46,716
22.7%
14.2% '
40.1%
Township 9
Total Township
2,454
2,564
2,617
4.5 %
2.1 %
6.6 %
Total Municipalities
52,112
58,211
64,061
11.7%
10.0%
22.9%
Total Unincorporated Areas
33,704
39,069
39,501
15.9%
1.1%
17.2%
Total County
85,816
97,280
103,562
13.4%
6.5%
20.7%
Source: State Data Center; Holland Consulting Planners, Inc.
Section II: Projected Land Development Analysis
II-3
'

Table 14
Projected Total Year -Round Population and Percentage Change by Township and Municipality
Craven County, 1995-2005
#2: High Growth Base Loading
(9,000, or 75% of 12,000 total additional military population + 1,200, or 50% of 2,400 additional primary civilian job population + 5,281, or
50% of 10,562 total secondary (jobs] population impact through 2000.)
Total Year -Round Population
Township
Municipality or Area
1995
2000
2005
Township 1
Vanceboro
1,015
1,068
1,131
Unincorporated Areas
4,891
5,147
5,226
Total Township
5,906
6,216
6,357
Township 2
Bridgeton
516
562
567
(5% of Military/Secondary)
Unincorporated Areas
6,221
7,229
7,553
Total Township
6,737
7,791
8,120
Township 3
Cove City
569
520
531
Dover
458
437
430
Unincorporated Areas
2,307
2,404
2,366
Total Township
3,334
3,361
3,328
Township 5
Total Township
2,594
4,211
4,225
(10% of Military/Secondary)
Township 6
(50% of Military/Secondary)
Township 7
(15% of Military/Secondary)
Township 8
(20% of Military/Secondary)
Township 9
Total Municipalities
Total Unincorporated Areas
Total County
Percentage Change
1995-2000
2000-2005
% Change
1995-2005
5.2%
5.8%
11.4%
5.2%
1.5%
6.8%
5.2%
2.3 %
7.6 %
8.9%
0.9%
9.9%
16.2%
4.5%
21.4%
15.6%
4.2%
20.5%
-8.6%
2.2%
-6.7%
-4.6%
-1.6%
-6.1 %
4.2%
-1.6%
2.6%
0.8%
-1.0%
-0.2%
62.3%
0.3%
62.9%
Havelock
21,042
25,984
25,739
23.5%
-0.9%
22.3%
Unincorporated Areas
3,553
6,540
6,618
84.1 %
1.2%
86.3%
Total Township
24,595.
32,524
32,357
32.2%
-0.5%
31.6%
Total Township
6,870
9,443
9,566
37.5%
1.3%
39.2%
New Bern
21,696
27,812
32,096
28.1 %
15.4 %
47.9 %
River Bend
2,655
2,957
3,137
11.3 %
6.1 %
18.2 %
Trent Woods
4,161
5,820
7,332
39.8%
26.0%
76.2%
Unincorporated Areas
4,829
6,736
6,582
39.5%
-2.3%
36.3%
Total Township
33,341
43,325
49,147
29.9%
13.4%
47.4%
Total Township
2,454
2,565
2,618
4.5 %
2.1 %
6.7 %
52,112
65,160
70,963
25.0%
8.9%
36.2%
33,704
44,276
44,755
31.4%
1.1%
32.8%
85,816
109,436
115,718
27.5%
5.7%
34.8%
Source: State Data Center; Holland Consulting Planners, Inc.
Section II: Projected Land Development Analysis
II-4

7. EDUCATION
LJ It is expected that the Craven County School Board will construct a new Havelock middle school
during the planning period. In 1997-1998, one of the five elementary schools was over capacity.
(� Thus, the need for the additional elementary school is immediate.
The following analysis of impact on the Craven County School System from the high military
(� growth scenario is included in the 1995 Craven County Land Use Plan.
"Based on the anticipated NADEP expansion and the Cecil Field realignment of
168 F-18 Hornet jets, and accompanying personnel, the military prepared estimates
u of school -age children to be added to impacted school systems. In 1995, the
anticipated number of F-18's has been reduced to 140. As a "crude" indicator of
school system impact, the military's original forecast has been proportionately
reduced to reflect 140 F-18's (a 17 % reduction). The following provides a
summary of the incoming Craven County school -age children based on 140 F-18's:
DElementary School 964
Middle School 298
High School 209
n Total 1,471
,u! In 1997-1998, twelve of the county's schools were over capacity. Two of the
elementary schools were over capacity. However, five new schools and
renovations/additions at all existing schools will -reduce the existing capacity
deficiencies. The increase in school -age children resulting from Cherry Point
expansion would result in a 9.95 % increase in school enrollment. Most of this
increase should be expected to occur in the elementary schools, where 964 students
would be added. "
This increase in school enrollment may be expected to place a heavy burden on the schools located
within Havelock's planning jurisdiction.
II-9.
8. SEWER SYSTEM
During the planning period, the city's wastewater treatment plant must be improved and expanded
because of more stringent requirements established by the current NPDES permit and increased
populating resulting from Cherry Point growth. The plant previously had a design capacity of 1.5
million gallons per day (mgd) and a peak flow capacity of 2.25 mgd. An expansion of the plant
was completed in February, 1998. The design and peak flow capacity increased to 1.9 and 2.4
,mgd, respectively. Wastewater effluent from the plant is currently land applied to farmland
Section II: Projected Land Development Analysis II-5

located in Jones County. However, this disposal site is in the process of closing. The new site
will be located in Jones County near the Town of Pollocksville.
Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point operates and maintains its own wastewater collection and
treatment systems. With recent upgrades to the treatment plant, the WWTP has a design capacity
of 3.5 mgd and a peak hydraulic flow capacity of 7.5 mgd. Wastewater effluent is discharged to
the Neuse River under NPDES permit no. NC0003816. A collection system infiltration and,
inflow elimination program provides for the identification and elimination of stormwater flows.
to the wastewater system, and a biological nutrient reduction program is in place to improve
nitrogen removal efficiencies at the plant. A project to upgrade the the biosolids treatment system
is currently under design. This project will reduce the time for biosolids treatment as well as
improve sludge handling operations. Biosolids produced at the plant are land applied at permitted
land application sights aboard the Air Station. Recently a Golf Course irrigation system has been
installed utilizing treated effluent for watering the course. Approximately 100,000 GPD is
diverted from the Neuse River discharge for this purpose.
Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point operates and maintains a separate industrial wastewater
pretreatment system. Upgrades have recently been completed to bring the design capacity to 0.63
mgd and the peak flow capacity to 0.91 mgd. Plant sludge is dewatered and disposed of by
contract at an approved- hazardous waste treatment facility located in South Carolina.
H-10.
9. WATER SYSTEM
The existing City of Havelock water system has a 1.2 million gallon surplus capacity. If the high
military growth scenario occurs, approximately 100,000 additional gallons of water per day may
be needed. Thus, it appears that the City of Havelock has adequate water capacity to
accommodate the high growth scenario.
Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point maintains and operates a 6.0 mgd water treatment plant
which receives groundwater from 26 active wells located within the Air Station. Completed in
December 1995, the WTP processes include precipitive softening, ozonation, granular media
filtration, and chlorine disinfection. Water storage consists of six elevated steel tanks which
provide an aggregate storage volume of 2.0 million gallons. A project to construct a raw water
aeration system is currently under construction. This process unit will reduce iron, manganese
and hardness, and reduce the oxidant demand of the water.
Although it has been determined that both the City of Havelock and MCAS Cherry Point will have
an adequate water capacity to meet demand during the planning period, close monitoring of well
yields is needed to prevent salt water intrusion. This is especially true during the peak summer
months when wells often pump at significantly higher than average rates. If salt water intrusion
occurs in a particular well, it essentially cannot be removed and may potentially contaminate other
wells due to their proximity. When salt water intrusion occurs in a well, it must either be
abandoned and a new well drilled, or a desalinization plant constructed. Both alternatives are very
expensive and should be avoided.
Section II: Projected Land Development Analysis 11-6 1

II-10.
10. STORM DRAINAGE
With or without expansion of the Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station, management of
stormwater runoff will remain an important issue in the City of Havelock. Improvement of water
quality in the Trent and Neuse Rivers and adjoining tributaries is important to both the tourist and
fishing industries. Urban development, industrial, and agricultural runoff are all contributors to
water pollution. There is no single culprit. If the high military growth scenario occurs, the
primary impact on stormwater runoff will result from residential and industrial construction and
(j on -base military construction.
As urban development continues in Havelock's planning jurisdiction, so will the construction of
impervious and semi -permeable surfaces, and the potential for surficial water contamination will
increase. Given that fact, it is recommended that the city strongly support existing Division of
Water Quality regulations (15 NCAC 2H.1000) during the planning period. The city should also
participate in and contribute to studies of storm drainage undertaken by public and private
agencies, support United States Department of Agriculture Best Management Practices for
(? croplands, and work closely with the Division of Marine Fisheries to protect primary and
j J secondary nursery areas. The city's primary nursery areas are located in Slocum Creek. Caution
should be taken to protect these areas from surficial water contamination.
II-11.
12. POLICE. FIRE, AND RESCUE SERVICES
The City of Havelock has 32 sworn public safety officers. This represents a ratio of one police
officer per each 900 in population. This is slightly below the state municipal average of 1.5
officers per 1,000 persons. Based on the state average and the no base loading public population
forecast, a total of 29 public safety officers should be provided in 2005. In the high growth
scenario, a total of 39 public safety officers should be provided in 2005.
The fire and rescue facilities are currently considered adequate to serve the city's needs during the
planning period. However, during the planning period, the volunteer EMT's may have to be
replaced with paid EMT's. If approved in the 1998-1999 budget, a full-time paid fire chief will
be added.
Section II: Projected Land Development Analysis II-7 1

SECTION IV: POLICY STATEMENTS
IV-1.
A. INTRODUCTION TO POLICY STATEMENTS
During 1995 and 1996, the NCAC 7B CAMA planning guidelines were revised. The revised
guidelines included new requirements for the development of policy statements. These changes
included the following policy statement additions:
-- A general vision policy statement describing the type of community
that the local government would like to become within the next ten
years.
-- A basic statement as to the community attitude toward resource
protection.
-- A policy addressing the protection of wetlands identified as being
of the highest functional significance on maps supplied by the
Division of Coastal Management. Wetland functional assessment
maps are not yet available for Craven County.
-- A policy addressing moorings and mooring fields.
-- A policy addressing water quality problems and management
measures designed to reduce or eliminate local sources of surface
water quality problems.
-- A statement as to the community attitude toward resource
production and management.
-- A statement as to the community attitude toward economic and
community development.
-- A policy addressing commitment to state and federal programs,
including housing rehabilitation, community development block
grants, housing for low and moderate income level citizens, water
and sewer installation, and rural water systems.
— A policy addressing assistance to interstate waterways.
Section IV: Policy Statements IV-1 ,

Based on the analysis of existing conditions and trends, suggestions from the city's citizens, and
substantial input and guidance from the Havelock Planning Board, the policies in the following
sections have been formulated to provide a guide for regulating growth, development, and
resource management throughout the planning period.
It should be noted that the following sections contain only the additional policy statements as
required by the revised NCAC 7B CAMA planning guidelines. Policies which were considered
but not adopted are included as Appendix I. The city's complete listing of policy statements is
included in the City of Havelock 1996 Land Use Plan.
IV-3.
VISION STATEMENT (New Section)
Havelock has developed based on a strong economic and cultural relationship with the military.
The city is proud of its military heritage and will continue to support a strong military presence.
At the same time, Havelock desires to strengthen its economy by expanding its commercial and
industrial base. Industrial and business development will be supported which is consistent with
15A NCAC 7H. Specifically, Havelock desires to accomplish the following during the planning
period:
-- Implement the City of Havelock Thoroughfare Plan.
-- Revitalize of the U.S.70 corridor business district.
-- Establish an annexation policy.
-- Evaluate the possibility of expanding the Havelock extraterritorial jurisdiction.
-- Implement the Downtown Revitalization Plan.
-- Improve recreational facilities.
-- Construct bridges over Slocum Creek on both the east and west access roads along
Highway 70.
-- Extend Greenfield Heights Boulevard.
-- Endorse expansion of school system facilities.
Section IV: Policy Statements IV-2 1 0

IV-3.
B. RESOURCE PROTECTION POLICY STATEMENTS
Community Attitude Toward Resource Protection (New Section)
Havelock's planning jurisdiction includes many valuable natural resources. These resources are
an environmental and economic resource which should be protected. The City of Havelock
supports resource protection policies which meet the 15A NCAA 7H minimum use standards.
Mooring Fields (New Policy)
POLICY: Because of shallow water and limited water areas, mooring fields have not
been an issue/problem within the city's planning jurisdiction. Therefore,
a policy statement is not required.
IV-4.
Stormwater Runoff (New Policy) (Issue discussed, page II-7 of this addendum)
POLICY: Havelock will support state regulations relating to stormwater runoff
resulting from development (stormwater disposal policy 15A NCAC
2H.001-.1003).
Implementation: The city will rely on appropriate state agencies and utilize
its zoning and subdivision regulations.
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
Water Qualily Management (New Policy) (Issue discussed, page I-12 of this addendum)
POLICY: Havelock supports improved water quality management, reduction of
nutrients in the Neuse River, and restoration of water quality in areas
closed to shell fishing.
Implementation:
(a) Adoption of a Craven County Stormwater Control Ordinance.
Schedule (a): FY2000-2005.
(b) Revise zoning ordinance to include minimization of impervious
cover in site design.
Section IV: Policy Statements IV-3 I

(c) Revise zoning ordinance to include regulation of -Intensive Livestock a
operations (ILO's).
(d) Revise subdivision ordinance to include limiting erosion during
construction.
Schedule (b)-(d): FY2000-2001.
IV-7.
C. RESOURCE PRODUCTION AND MANAGEMENT POLICIES
Community Attitude Toward Resource Production and Mana eme (New Section)
Resource production should not adversely affect Havelock's conservation areas. The city will
implement policies which support resource production and management. In its pursuit of
industrial development, the city will emphasize the following:
-- Development of industry in non-residential areas.
-- Location of industry with direct access to major thoroughfares.
-- Recruitment of clean, non-polluting industries.
-- Preference will be given to industries producing only domestic waste.
IV-7.
D. ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Community Attitude Toward Economic and Community Development (New Section)
The City of Havelock desires to expand its economic base, including Cherry Point expansion,
tourism, commercial fishing, retail and wholesale trade, real estate and construction, and industrial
development. The city will support growth and development at the densities specified in the land
classification definitions. The desired pattern of development is shown on the Land Classification
Map. Havelock's economic development goals should be compatible with and complementary to
Cherry Point's existing and proposed activities. All economic and community development should
be consistent with 15A NCAC 7H.
IV-14.
Assistance in Interstate Waterways (New Policy) (Issue discussed, page I-12 of this addendum)
POLICY: Havelock supports continued maintenance of the interstate waterway.
Implementation: Havelock will rely on the appropriate state and federal
agencies for implementation of this policy.
Schedule: Continuing Activity.
Section IV: Policy Statements IV-4 I a

IV-15.
Transportation (Issue discussed, page I-25 of this addendum)
The City of Havelock supports construction of the following transportation improvements by the
North Carolina Department of Transportation or the Craven County Regional Airport, as
applicable.
-- Improve NC 101, Havelock Planning Area to Carteret County (5.70 mi.)
-- Improve SR 1756 (Lake Road), Havelock Planning Area to Carteret County (0.90
-- Construct U.S. 70, Havelock Bypass (8.6 mi.)
-- NC 101 widening, Roosevelt to Cunningham, four lanes to five (0.3 mi.)
-- NC 101 widening, Cunningham to Webb, two lanes to five (0.3 mi.)
-- Cunningham Boulevard extension from US 70 to Lake Road (1.7 mi.)
-- Greenfield Heights Boulevard extension to US 70 (2.8 mi.)
-- SR 1746 (Church Road), replace bridge over Slocum Creek.
-- Construction of bridges over Slocum Creek on both the east and west access roads
along Hwy 70.
-- Southern Railway Crossing 722 605F. Safety improvements.
-- SR 1763 (Miller Boulevard) and NC 101, SR 1756 (Lake Road) to Outer Banks
Drive. Widen to an urban curb and gutter facility.
-- All Craven County Regional Airport improvements indicated in the airport's five-
year transportation improvement program. This includes, but is not limited to,
construction of a new terminal building and extension off runway 13-31.
Schedule: Continuing Activities, FY1998-2005.
Section IV: Policy Statements . IV-5 I

IV-16.
E. CONTINUING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
As the initial step in the preparation of this addendum, the City of Havelock prepared and adopted
a "Citizen Participation Plan. " The plan outlined the methodology for citizen involvement
(Appendix II). Public involvement was generated through public information meetings and
development of the plan by the Havelock Planning Board.
A public information meeting was conducted at the outset of the project on November 24, 1997,
at 7:15 p.m., in the City Hall Auditorium. Subsequently, meetings of the Planning Board were
held on January 6, 1998; February 3, 1998; and May 5, 1998. All meetings were advertised and
open to the public.
The preliminary plan was submitted to the Division of Coastal Management for comment on July
16, 1998. Following receipt of DCM comments, the plan was amended, and a formal public
hearing on the final document was conducted on March 22, 1999. The public hearing was
advertised in the Sun Journal on February 20, 1999. The plan was approved by the Havelock
Board of Commissioners on March 22, 1999, and submitted to the Coastal Resources Commission
for certification. The plan was certified on March 26, 1999.
Citizen input will continue to be solicited, primarily through the Planning Board, with advertised
and adequately publicized public meetings held to discuss special land use issues and to keep
citizens informed.
Section IV: Policy Statements IV-6 I

i
APPENDIX I
CITY OF HAVELOCK
POLICIES CONSIDERED BUT NOT ADOPTED
Moorin Fields
ields
POLICY: Havelock opposes the establishment of mooring fields and will adopt a local
ordinance to regulate/prohibit the establishment of mooring fields.
POLICY: Havelock supports the establishment of mooring fields and will prepare a water use
plan as a prerequisite to state certification of mooring fields within the county.
Appendix I 1 '

APPENDIX II
CITY OF HAVELOCK
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
PREPARATION OF LAND USE PLAN ADDENDUM
FISCAL YEAR 1997-98
The City of Havelock has received a FY97-98 Coastal Area Management Act grant for preparation
of an addendum to its existing Land Use Plan. Adequate citizen participation in the development- ---
of the addendum is essential to the preparation of a document responsive to the needs of the
citizens of Havelock. To ensure such input, the following citizen participation program will be
utilized by the city.
The Havelock Planning Board will be responsible for supervision of the project. The Planning
Board will report to and coordinate addendum development with the City of Havelock Board of
Commissioners.
The Planning Board will work with the city's planning consultant to ensure that the final product
will respond to the revised 15A NCAC 7B planning requirements. Specifically, the planning
consultant and the Planning Board will be responsible for ensuring accomplishment of the
following:
— An updated land use plan based on an effective citizen participation process.
-- Development of new policies required to respond to the revised 15A NCAC 7B planning
requirements.
— Protection of AECs.
— Support for growth of the Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station.
-- Central Business District revitalization.
— Improved recreational facilities.
-- Improved thoroughfare planning.
— Support of affordable housing.
The following schedule will be utilized:
1. November 24, 1997 -- Meet with the City of Havelock Board of Commissioners to have the
Citizen Participation Plan adopted, and conduct a public information meeting. The meeting
will be advertised in a local newspaper. The city will specifically discuss the policy
statements contained in the 1996 Havelock Land Use Plan. The significance of the policy
statements to the CAMA land use planning process shall be described. The process by
which the City of Havelock will solicit the views of a wide cross-section of citizens in the
development of the updated policy statements will be explained.
2. November, 1997 -- complete identification of existing land use problems, develop
socioeconomic base data, and review community facilities needs.
3. December, 1997 - Conduct introductory meeting with the Planning Board to discuss the
land use plan update process and to deliver the first section of the draft LUP Addendum.
4. February, 1998 — Present complete draft sections of the LUP Addendum and preliminary
policy statements to the Havelock Planning Board.

5. February/March, 1998 -- Review draft Land Use Plan Addendum with the Planning Board.
6. April, 1998 -- Review draft Land Use Plan Addendum with Board of Commissioners,
conduct a public information meeting for review of the proposed addendum, and submit
draft of completed Land Use Plan Addendum to the Department of Environment, Health
and Natural Resources Division of Coastal Management staff for review and comment.
S. Following receipt of Division of Coastal Management comments (est. July, 1998) — Present
proposed Land Use Plan Addendum to Board of Commissioners for adoption, and conduct
a formal public hearing.
All meetings of the City of Havelock Planning Board and Board of Commissioners at which the
addendum of the Land Use Plan will be discussed will be advertised in a local newspaper in a
non -legal ad section. In addition, public service announcements will be sent to local radio stations
and posted in the Municipal Building. All meetings will be open to the public. The city will
encourage and consider all economic, social, ethnic, and cultural viewpoints. No major non-
English speaking groups are known to exist in Havelock.
11 /24/97
LANDUSETPP.HAVELOCK