NCDOT - 70443B

❑LAMA / ❑ DREDGE & FILL No 70443 A � C D
GENERAL PERMIT Previous permit #
❑New ❑Modification ❑Complete Reissue El Partial Reissue Date previous permit issued
As authorized by the State of North Carolina, Department of Environmental Quality D —7 H D. 3 c o
and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant to 15A NCAC ules attached.
Applicant Name
NC Oo — Project Location: County 8" o 74- f [o4 y
Address
CIO 'rn V J e ° r r*� "�` 1 f"" I � e f Street Address/ State Road/ Lot #(s) Bf f ) c 1
9Afr a '1 � pox. d.3,►, lcr So J21s��
City d2 1$ !s� State N ZIP i r'
f;� 1�
� � 17 6 0 �'u i r 6. it P 07NC C � Subdivision
Phone # (°I j q) E-Mail r t N ZIP
Authorized Agent City
❑ Cw ❑ EW _g�KA ❑ ES I TS Phone # (_) River Basin
Affected ❑ OEA ❑ HHF ❑ IH ❑ URA ❑ N/A v �/ c r R k at man unkn
AEC(s):
Adj. Wtr. Body � � �
❑ PWS: i M^'ll a f21 V er
� Closest Maj. Wtr. Body
ORW: yes / t"o) PNA (& / no
Type of Project/ Activity V\ e
rr6 b,'J
P
ier (iixed
Floati
Finger
Groin
Bulkh
Basin
Boat
Boatl
Beac
Othi
Shor
SAV
Mor
Phoi
Wai,
cc
W%�a ?3'vv;je x -70' ►oo
G a• floc ! • _ 1 r fir. r tr u (Scale: N 1A
■
Ali
ME
ON
ME
No
M
ME
NO
ME
ME
A building permit may be required by: 1 -fo r I r & �` ��� [9" ee note on back regarding River Basin rules.
( Note Local Planning Jurisdictional ��, rk f R I J� I r b, 3 ; f�1 e.r-1c-
Notes/ Special Conditions t! J �v d l n V`/ ` 11
R fr
.IL/.! -T7 . a'c%4irj 6rd1 * •, 4 N Le
QiriT}ftf �ir<(���� ar feI/< jlln l)01T_'vl '4' rc! .I'ftcl� �c
} .. F. t t "' �,41 I GJ•T ' J iy' I• 4 o r J -2 c + w "• a.. j
Agent or Applicant Printed Name Permit Officers -Printed Name
Signature Please read compliance statement on back of permit" Signature
Application Fee(s) Check # Issuing Date Expiration Date

Statement of Compliance and Consistency
This permit is subject to compliance with this application, site drawing and attached general and specific conditions. Any
violation of these terms may subject the permittee to a fine or criminal or civil action; and may cause the permit to become
null and void.
This permit must be on the project site and accessible to the permit officer when the project is inspected for compliance. The
applicant certifies by signing this permit that 1) prior to undertaking any activities authorized by this permit, the applicant will
confer with appropriate local authorities to confirm that this project is consistent with the local land use plan and all local
ordinances, and 2) a written statement or certified mail return receipt has been obtained from the adjacent riparian
landowner(s) .
The State of North Carolina and the Division of Coastal Management, in issuing this permit under the best available
information and belief, certify that this project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal Management Program.
River Basin Rules Applicable To Your Project:
_ Tar- Pamlico River Basin Buffer Rules Other:
Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules
If indicated on front of permit, your project is subject to the Environmental Management Commission's Buffer Rules for the
River Basin checked above due to its location within that River Basin. These buffer rules are enforced by the NC Division of
Water Resources. Contact the Division of Water Resources at the Washington Regional Office (252-946-6481) or the
Wilmington Regional Office (910-796-7215) for more information on how to comply with these buffer rules.
Division of Coastal Management Offices
Morehead City Headquarters
400 Commerce Ave
Morehead City, NC 28557
252-808-2808/ I-888-4RCOAST
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Carteret, Craven, Onslow -
North of New River Inlet- and Pamlico
Counties)
Elizabeth City District
401 S. Griffin St.
Ste. 300
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
252-264-3901
Fax:[phone]
(Serves: Camden, Chowan, Currituck,
Dare, Gates, Pasquotank and Perquimans
Counties)
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/cm/dcm-home
Washington District
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
252-946-6481
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Beaufort, Bertie, Hertford, Hyde,
Tyrrell and Washington Counties)
Wilmington District
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
910-796-7215
Fax:[phone]
(Serves: Brunswick, New Hanover,
Onslow - South of New River Inlet -
and Pender Counties)
Revised 7/06/ 17

L AMA /❑ DREDGE & FILL I` a 1 2/ 0443 A 6) C D
t
WGf.NF_KAkL PERMIT Previous permit#
ew ❑Modification ❑Complete Reissue ❑Partial Reissue Date previous permit issued
As authorized by the State of North Carolina, Department of Environmental Quality '7 ff �L7D `
and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant to I SA NCAC
n �' ules attached.
Applicant Name f ° C �® Project Location: County 8+�'�`t Cow«}�
tr�Y��„L,�+�r
Address C1C ��� Street Address/ State Road/ Lot #(s)
0. 3,^y1ei-
City State N G ZIP
Phone # (41 :� 0- ^� �da E-Mail fri6JI *CfTNC-, CC Subdivision
Authorized Agent G �"411- _w,, b`' City I zip *1-7 2T O F
❑ CW ❑ EW CA DES [9-4S Phone # ( ) River Basin
Affected ❑ OEA ❑ HHF ❑ IH ❑ UBA ❑ N/A
AEC(s): Adj. Wtr. Body v "GT e z K a man Junkin
❑ PWS: p; yr� be, j\) V er
ORW: yes /ina} PNA es / no Closest Maj. Wtr. Body
Type of Project/ Activity
it r� � .r-l" h
Pie
lZr
Fixed
Foati
Finge
Groir
Bulk[
Basin
Boat
Boat
Beac
Oth(
Shor
SAV
Mon
Phot
Wan
%o ,
t � r
�Jc.c,.z t Qi?C.lT(n A; fA.� i�9. A �'wu x
saXfOC.l • '"i 1n�r�JTrN� ure,
(Scale: N // )
e
ON
NMM
No
M
ME
�
�
MMINNEI
MEN
ME
mom
MIME
M
ONION
ENE
MEN
IMEMME
IN
IN
ON
M
00
M
T!
so
-NIB
No
ENE
0
EMMEMEMENNEEMINEEMEN
ON
0
NEESE
0
_MMMNM
mom
M
NIEMEN
lmmoommomommm
F11111111FRIM
PINE
1!
MEMO
ME
0
M
MEESE
M
No
mm�
M
MEN
ME
NNE
MIM
MOMMENEESEto
'aMENE■
�
i■■■
■
MMM1■
NEESE
NoEMENONEEME
EMENNEEN
MENOMONEE
mom
MEN
is
NIEMEN
M
NEON
====
IMMI
IMEMEMOMMIMMM
NONNI
Emom
mom
MINE
111111-01IN
mom
MEMO
A building permit may be required by: +v w o'r [_J ee note on back regarding River Basin rules.
( Note Local Planning Jurisdiction �) L p r
Notes/ Special Conditions � Iw 0 i 11' ✓�"T� �'� r� ,� j� �'"a--
��,v >✓✓-�Y ��/'u >�
.Pl"'v�!'r�M DYA
G� `�a-fr•�;;�. �;�i11z r�e11 i► ���,.��- I, +fT
li►�'�'frx ty %l r: ���)^) a,,.%y roiie 'Lzi✓•+J",j c,,,.k oJk'u^ b-z-
r' ,=Cc s> a(••Ntx VV(1-11 P 'T '/ 114't rx.
Agent or Applicant Printed Name
Signature ** Please read compliance statement on back of permit
I--L{a o, o o Wgj'.P Y7 0 P. )_, P F,?
Application Fee(s) Check #
^t►'M-n
Permit Officer's rinted Name
Signature
Issuing Date
Expiration Date

NC Division. of Coastal Mgt. Application Computer Sheet, Page 3 of 4)
Applicant: I v C v G U
Date:
Describe, below the HABITAT disturbances for the`. application. All values'should match the name, and units of measurement
found in your Habitat code sheet. y
Habitat Name
D/S_TURB TYPE
CitoQse'One
TOTAL Set'. . Ft
(Appl►ed for „
Drsturb. ance total
includes airy
antrc►li 4-
restor 90h, or.:
fem'`1[n"acts
FINAL Sg. Ft
(Arltiapated fine/
diatwbance.
Ealyy�desany
restorafion ,
and/or temp .
irri actamount
TOTAL Feet
(Appfled for
Qfsturbance
foul Jt�cludes
any„antlgPated
reslorehdh or
tem lm acts
FINAL Feet.
(Anttdpated final
d1f, J ance.
Excludes any
riestorahon and/or
temp irtrpact .
amourit
r` �:.��,.���
J
Dredge ❑ Fill [Both ❑. Other ❑
�PD
Dredge.❑ F►fl.�Bot,h ❑ Offjer 0
u070.
M�
Ato.7a
/
0' Fill,❑ Bdfh I❑ Other 0'
k(a 8 .
j
�( 6
Dredge Fill U Both Other U
A,c
R
Dredge ❑ FiQ ❑ Both ❑ Other j
r•
/ . : .
grtadgb. ❑ Fill ❑ Bofh ❑ . _Other' ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill P. Boo.- ❑ Other O
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both Other .0
Dredge ❑ Eil! ❑ Bob , ❑ Other ❑ '
Dredge ❑ .Fill ❑ Bpth 0 Other ❑
13redge.❑ . Fill ❑ Both [} Other p
Preogea.Q. Flll0 Both Other ❑
Dredge ❑ F111 ❑ Both Q. Other ❑
Dredge inFill 0 Both .Q Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other p
252-808-2808 :: 1-888.4RCOA.ST :: v^w4mccoastalmanagement.net revised:02115110

0 Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery
. .1 ON DELIVERY
Is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so eturn
we can
rto
❑ Agent
the card to you.
■ Attachtthis card the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space
B. Rec ived by (Prlpted Name Addressee
) C. Date of Delivery
permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
/X
D. Is delivery address different from item t? I []yes
If YES, enter delivery address
below: ❑ No
l2 A6Sf Pd .
f / 61 F
O
3. Service Type
0 Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted D I'
2. Article Number a very? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes
(Transfer from service labslabei, 7 010 1060 0002 3895 1513
PS Form 3811, February 2004
Domestk Return Receipt
102595-02-M-1540
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reve
so that we can return the card to you, rse
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
t • Article Addressed to:
11wd- i�l��u�t�✓�/�1�, �s LJ-C
AX
A. 'nature
X ❑ Agent
B. Received b Addressee
Y (Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery
D. Is delivery address different from item 1?
If YES, enter deliveryYes
address below: ❑ No
3• Service Type
❑ Certified Mail ❑Express Mail
I
❑ Registered 13 Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ nsured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
2• Article Number 4• Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee)
El
(Transfer from service label) 7 010 1060 00112 389.5 1520 Yes
PS Form 3811, February 2004
Domestic Retum Repot
102595-02-M-1540

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
4901 TRADEMARK DRIVE
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27610
919-212-1760 * FAX [phone]
www.environmentalservicesinc.com
October 25, 2018
Mr. Stephen Lane
N.C. Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
Re: 17BP.2.R.88, Replacement of Beaufort County Bridge 135
Beaufort County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Lane:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation Highway Division 2 is submitting the attached
CAMA General Permit application for the replacement of Bridge 135 on Post Road (SR 1742)
over Rowland Creek in Beaufort County, North Carolina. The proposed construction will
consist of the replacement of the existing prestressed concrete channels with a cored slab bridge
at the same location. A 5.4-mile off -site detour is proposed. The project is located in the Tar -
Pamlico River Basin.
No impacts to wetlands or surface waters are proposed for this project. Impacts to Tar -Pamlico
River riparian buffers are proposed and are minimized as much as practicable.
Please comment on the attached permit application at your earliest convenience. Please contact
me if you have any questions or need any further information.
Sincerely,
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Robert Turnbull
Senior Manager
Attachments: CAMA General Permit Application, Project Narrative, Figures, Stormwater Management Plan, Permit
Drawings, NCDOT Historic Architecture and Landscapes No Survey Form, NCDOT No Archaeological Survey
Required Form
RECEIVED
0CI 2, 92�118
®CM-MHD CITY

IN NF4
APPUCATION for
Nalor Development Permit
(last revised 12/27/06)
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1. Primary Applicant(Landowner Information
Business Name
Ncdot Highway Division 2
Project Name (if applicable)
17BP.2.R.88, Beaufort Bridge 135
Applicant 1: First Name
Heather
MI
C
Last Name
Lane
Applicant 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
If additional applicants, please attach an additional page(s) with names listed.
Mailing Address
1037 W.H. Smith Boulevard
PO Box
City
Greenville
State
NC
ZIP
27835
Country
USA
Phone No.
252 - 439 - 2813 ext.
FAX No.
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
[e-mail]
2. Agent/Contractor Information
Business Name
Environmental Sedvices, Inc.
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Robert
T
Turnbull
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
4901 Trademark Drive
Raleigh
NC
ZIP
Phone No. 1
Phone No. 2
27615
919 - 212 - 1760
ext. 204
919 - 819 - 1846 ext.
FAX No.
Contractor #
904 470 2122
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
[e-mail]
<Form continues on back>
RECEIVED
OCT 2 9 20':,3
5 -808 L 'f ` — 1 - € 8-4 OAS I ;: ruL' „ r taastYttYi r +�Ili��ilTY

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 2 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
3. Project Location
County (can be multiple)
Street Address
State Rd. #
Beaufort
Post Road at Rowland Creek
1742
Subdivision Name
City
State
Zip
N/A
Bath
NC
-
Phone No.
Lot No.(s) (if many, attach additional page with list)
N/A - - ext.
N/A, I , ,
a. In which NC river basin is the project located?
b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
Tar -Pamlico
Rowland Creek
c. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade?
d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
®Natural ❑Manmade ❑Unknown
Pamlico River
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
f. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
❑Yes ®No
work falls within.
4.
Site Description
a.
Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.)
b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.)
151 feet
0.8 acre
c.
Size of individual lot(s)
d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
n/a, I I
NWL (normal water level)
(If many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list)
6-8 ft ®NHW or ❑NWL
e.
Vegetation on tract
Vegetation within the project area consists of riverine swamp forest, emergent powerline communities, and maintained lawn
and roadside communities.
f.
Man-made features and uses now on tract
Existing 2 lane bridge on Post Road (SR 1742).
g.
Identify and describe the existing land uses adjacent to the proposed project site.
Land uses adjacent to the project and in the project vicinity are rural residential areas, forested lands, and agricultural fields.
h.
How does local government zone the tract?
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
N/A
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
❑Yes ❑No ®NA
j.
Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? ❑Yes ®No
k.
Hasa professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. ®Yes ❑No ❑NA
If yes, by whom? NCDOT HEU
I.
Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
National Register listed or eligible property?
<Form continues on next page>
RECEIVED
OCT 2 9 20118
Jarrr MI 113 eITY
vi
1- 08-2 a .. 1-�? - �3 y t �a t tsz a raf, t

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 3 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
m. (i) Are there wetlands on the site? ®Yes [-]No
(ii) Are there coastal wetlands on the site? ❑Yes NNo
(iii) If yes to either (i) or (ii) above, has a delineation been conducted? NYes []No
(Attach documentation, if available)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
No wastewater treatment facilities area located within the project area.
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
No water supply source is present in the project area.
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems.
No current stormwater management systems are in place. Stormwater drains directly into Rowland Creek
5. Activities and Impacts
a. Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use? ❑Commercial NPublic/Government
❑Private/Community
b. Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
The project will replace the existing bridge on SR 1742 (Post Road) over Rowland Creek.
c. Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
The project will replace the existing prestressed concrete channels on timber joists, caps, and piles with a cored slab bridge
at the same location. The project work will consist of grading, widening, drainage improvements, bridge replacement, and
pavement markings. This work will be conducted using standard road construction equipment. An in -water construction
moratoria will apply to this project from February 15 - September 30. Equipment will] be stored on -site in upland areas.
d. List all development activities you propose.
Replacement of existing prestressed concrete channels on timber joists, caps, and piles with a cored slab bridge.
e. Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? Maintenance
f. What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project? 0.8 ❑Sq.Ft or NAcres
g. Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area NYes ❑No ❑NA
that the public has established use of?
h. Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
No discharges to waters of the state are proposed.
I. Will wastewater or stormwater be discharged into a wetland? NYes ❑No ❑NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water? NYes ❑No ❑NA
j. Is there any mitigation proposed? ❑Yes NNo ❑NA
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal.
<Form continues on back>
Kt('CI V CtJ
0 C 1 2 9 2VI18
5;-1- 08- 808 ., 1- 88-4RCGAS ` �jwvv,necoastatrr anammimME)tclTy

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 4 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
6. Additional Information
/n addition to this completed application form, (MP-1) the following items below, if applicable, must be submitted in order for the application
package to be complete. Items (a) — (f) are always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
instruction booklet on how to properly prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
f. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name Thad E. Tankard, Jr. Holdings, LLC Phone No.
Address 437 Craven Street, Bath, NC 27808
Name Bath Creek Farms, LLC Phone No.
Address 124 Post Road, Bath, NC 27808
Name Phone No.
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, if applicable.
i. Wetland delineation, if necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10), if necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
7. Certification and Permission to Enter on Land
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Date% t $ Print Name /Z..L,,% • ��.�� �TT
Signature
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed project.
®DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information ®DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
❑DCM MP-3 Upland Development
❑DCM MP-4 Structures Information
DECEIVED
OCT 2 9 2018
,252-808-2808 1-888-4RCOAST .. www.nc;coasta1man,0CWMHDtCITY

Form DCM MP-2
EXCAVATION and FILL
(Except for bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation and/or fill activities. All values should be given in feet.
Access
Other
Channel
(NLW or
Canal
Boat Basin
Boat Ramp
Rock Groin
Rock
(excluding
Breakwater
shoreline
NWL)
stabilization
54 ft (south
Length
side), 51 ft
(north side)
8 ft (south
Width
side), 6 ft
(north side)
Avg. Existing
Depth
NA
NA
0
Final Project
Depth
NA
NA
0
9. EXCAVATION ElThis section not applicable
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or NWL in b. Type of material to be excavated.
cubic yards. sand
c. (i) Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlands/marsh
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SIB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL ENone
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
bridge construction
d. High -ground excavation in cubic yards.
113 CY (south side), 4 CY (north side)
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL ❑This section not applicable
a. Location of disposal area. b. Dimensions of disposal area.
TB D
c. (i) Do you claim title to disposal area?
EYes ❑No ❑NA
(ii) If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner
e. (i) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SIB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL ENone
(ii) Describe the purpose of disposal in these areas:
Remove fill from project area for bridge replacement.
TBD
d. (i) Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance?
❑Yes ENo ❑NA
(ii) If yes, where?
f. (i) Does the disposal include any area in the water?
❑Yes ENo ❑NA
(ii) If yes, how much water area is affected?
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www,nccoastallmanagemen#.net
RECEIVED
OCT 2 9
DCM-MHD TY 1 r2st0s

Form DCM MP-2 (Excavation and Fill, Page 2 of 3)
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION ®This section not applicable
(If development is a wood groin, use MP-4 — Structures)
a. Type of shoreline stabilization:
❑Bulkhead ❑Riprap ❑Breakwater/Sill ❑Other:
c. Average distance waterward of NHW or NWL:
e. Type of stabilization material:
g. Number of square feet of fill to be placed below water level
Bulkhead backfill Riprap
Breakwater/Sill Other
i. Source of fill material.
b. Length:
Width:
d. Maximum distance waterward of NHW or NWL:
f. (i) Has there been shoreline erosion during preceding 12
months?
❑Yes ❑No DNA
(ii) If yes, state amount of erosion and source of erosion amount
information.
h. Type of fill material.
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES ❑This section not applicable
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. (i) Will fill material be brought to the site? MYes ❑No DNA b. 0) Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands/marsh (CW),
If yes,
(ii) Amount of material to be placed in the water 0
(iii) Dimensions of fill area 54 ft long, 8 ft wide (south side):
51 ft long, 6 ft wide (north side)
(iv) Purpose of fill
rip -rap around new bridge
submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or
other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
❑WL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the fill in these areas:
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion b. What type of construction equipment will be used (e.g., dragline,
controlled? backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
NCDOT sediment and erosion control BMPs will be used to contain Standard roadway equipment
on -site fill material.
c. (i) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the project?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, explain what type and how they will be implemented.
10/8/2018
Date
17BP.2.R.88 - Beaufort Bridge 135
Project Name
d. (i) Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project
site? ❑Yes ®No [:]NA
(ii) If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
NO 6. 1
Applicant Name / l
Applicant Signature
®CT 2 Pi
' 2-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :. ua vi.n LoMto f 40J e!�KIAt not revisem 12126106

Form DCM MP-2 (Excavation and Fill, Page 3 of 3)
RECEIVED
OCT 2 9 2018
DCM-MHD CITY
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastaimana_qement.net revised: 12126/06

Nmi OCM WS
BRIDGES and CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
1. BRIDGES ❑This section not applicable
a. Is the proposed bridge: b. Water body to be crossed by bridge:
❑Commercial ®Public/Government ❑Private/Community Rowland Creek
c. Type of bridge (construction material):
cored slab
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at NLW or NWL:
7ft
e. (i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? ®Yes ❑No f
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge: 71 ft.
(iii) Width of existing bridge: 26 ft
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge: 3.61 ft
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain) Yes, all of the existing bridge will be
removed and replaced.
g. Length of proposed bridge: 70'
(i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert? ❑Yes NNo
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert:
(iii) Width of existing culvert:
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
h. Width of proposed bridge: 33'
i. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow? ❑Yes NNo j. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by reducing or
If yes, explain: increasing the existing navigable opening? ❑Yes NNo
If yes, explain:
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge: 3.65 ft I. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard concerning their
approval? ❑Yes NNo
If yes, explain:
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing no navigable n. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands: N/A
waters? ❑Yes NNo
If yes, explain:
2. CULVERTS NThis section not applicable
a. Number of culverts proposed:
b. Water body in which the culvert is to be placed:
< Form continues on back>
DECEIVE
OCT 2 9 2" ",3
252-808-2808 :: 1- 88-4 COAST :; vv .ncconstatmanags ent net DVMr+�L kQ. %1W48

Form DCM MP-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 2 of 4)
c. Type of culvert (construction material):
d. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
❑Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge:
(iii) Width of existing bridge:
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge: _
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain)
f. Length of proposed culvert:
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the NHW or NWL.
j. Will the proposed culvert affect navigation by reducing or
increasing the existing navigable opening? ❑Yes ❑No
If yes, explain:
e. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
[]Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert(s):
(iii) Width of existing culvert(s):
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
9• Width of proposed culvert:
I. Depth of culvert to be buried below existing bottom contour.
k. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
[-]Yes ❑No
If yes, explain:
3. EXCAVATION and FILL ❑This section not applicable
a. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation below the NHW or NWL? ❑Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated:
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated:
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated:
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards:
b. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
RECEIVED
OCT 2 9 201
IV`lU_ D rlry
252-808-2808 y+rvj-nccoastalmanagement.not revised:10126106

Form DCM MP-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 3 of 4)
C.
d
e.
0
(i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
high -ground excavation? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated: 51 ft (south side), 47
ft. (north side)
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated: 8 ft (south side), 2 ft
(north side0
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated: 7.5 ft (south side),
1.2 ft (north side)
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards: 113
CY(south side), 4 CY (north side)
If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any excavation, please complete the following:
(i) Location of the spoil disposal area: TBD
(ii) Dimensions of the spoil disposal area: TBD
(iii) Do you claim title to the disposal area? ®Yes []No (If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.)
(iv) Will the disposal area be available for future maintenance? ❑Yes ®No
(v) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAVs), other wetlands (WL), or shell
bottom (SB)?
❑CW ❑SAV ❑WL ❑SB ®None
If any boxes are checked, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
(vi) Does the disposal area include any area below the NHW or NWL? ? []Yes ®No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
(i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed below NHW or NWL? ❑Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled:
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled:
(iv) Purpose of fill:
(i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed on high -ground? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled: 317 ft. (north side), 370 ft.
(south side)
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled: 12 ft. (north side), 11 ft.
(south side)
(iv) Purpose of fill: roadway approach
f. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
❑WL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
RECEIVED
4. GENERAL O C T 2 9 ?'A
a. Will the proposed project require the relocation of any existing b. Will the proposed project require the p}lftiMg Ty4 je {ojary
252-8 8-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST sa ww <; ccoastatmanagement.net revised- 10r26.'06

Form DCM MP-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 4 of 4)
utility lines?
If yes, explain: .
[]Yes ®No detour structures?
If yes, explain:
If this portion of the proposed project has already received
approval from local authorities, please attach a copy of the
approval or certification.
< Form continues on back>
❑Yes ®No
c. Will the proposed project require any work channels? d. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion
❑Yes ®No controlled?
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2. NCDOT sediment and erosion control BMPs will be used to
contain on -site fill material.
e. What type of construction equipment will be used (for example,
dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
Standard roadway equipment
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
shoreline stabilization? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, complete form MP-2, Section 3 for Shoreline
Stabilization only.
10l8l2018
Date
17BP.2.R.88, Beaufort Bridge 135
Project Name
NCDOT
Applicant Name
Applicant Signature
f. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project site?
❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
RECEIVED
OCT 2 92018
DCM-MHD CITY
252-808-2808 .: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastai_manage.ment.net revised: 10/26/06

RIGHT OF ENTRY & AGENT AUTHORIZATION
I/We North Carolina Department of Transportation (Owner Name), the owner(s) of the
property commonly identified as Beaufort County Bridge 135 (17BP.2.R.88) ,
(street)
Beaufort State of NC ;
(City/Town) (County)
hereby grant, freely and without coercion, the right of access and entry to said property to
Environmental Services, Inc., including but not limited to its employees, contractors,
subcontractors and any applicable regulatory agency personnel, for the purpose of
environmental, ecological, or archaeological assessments.
This access agreement is effective upon signature and shall remain in effect until such time as
assessment activities are completed, including any ancillary activities associated with said
activities.
Environmental Services, Inc. is also granted the right to act as my authorized agent for the
purposes of conducting a site review, submitting any permit applications, and any future
consultation with regulatory agencies.
For the consideration and purposes set forth herein, I/We hereby acknowledge, accept and agree
to the terms of the Right of Entry & Agent Authorization Agreement as evidenced by my dated
signature below.
, t f
Signed this _ day of AU-� 2018.
Print Name:
Signature:
RECEIVED
OCT 2 9
DCM-MHD CITY

17BP.2.R.88 — Beaufort County
Project Narrative
October 2018
Project Location: Bridge No. 135 over Rowland Creek on Post Road (SR 1742) in Beaufort County
Project Description: The purpose of this project is to replace Beaufort County Bridge No. 135 on Post Road
(SR 1742) over Rowland Creek. Bridge No. 135 is 71 feet long with a deck width of 26 feet. The
replacement structure will be a cored slab bridge approximately 70 feet long providing a minimum of 33
feet clear deck width. The bridge will include two 11-foot lanes and 2-foot paved shoulders. The bridge
length is based on preliminary design information and is set by hydraulic requirements.
The approach roadway will extend approximately 0.07 mile on the south end of the bridge and
0.06 mile on the north end of the bridge. The roadway will be designed using Sub -Regional Tier
Guidelines with a 60 mile per hour design speed.
Traffic will be detoured offsite 5.4 miles during construction.
RECEIVED
OCT 2 9 2C.1
DCM-MHD CITY

m
M
N O
r
-,
N 11 O d d
C
N
JIc
ON
N
_
O m E
o O- 3
N
a
O
Z
N O)
�
Y
p c
U Il L 'lp Y d
j
W
a
d
m 0 L
o h 3
>
d C
N
d
N
-O
Il C O d
O l6 N N
Z tQ
co
C
m
Y U O U i
U Z
c
d
'o
N
6
a,
a
C
�
V)
U) «
ca
L O 3 C
"O
N
m
N a
N
N
C
U
O
d C
a A
� I� N— lY0
m OU c
C
�p
c
d
>
Y O_
d
N
U
X
t
a
>
4)
m
m
y m
M
a « Y; axi
c
w
Q
c
0
O
mo a,
`�
m 3 `o co L
'L
W
a
y
U
N
�_
a
d C U yNj ca
N E
C
m
O
LL
V
O
3
L o
U
y
d
d
c
L
C�
0
x Z
O
U L
7
ai ac
c C
> d O n
O C tp C
N Y
O
A
N
d
d
CL
F
N
W «� .N
'7
V
'O
O
N N
d V N
YO « N R
C
N
T
w
F-
Z
2
t7
M (n a�
O
N
C
O
> N
c0m
y d U
m
a)
C
O .. a Ccm❑
O
ID_
o
a
0
E
w
m
aN
d
Nv.a
'R
0
1
z
a
a
0
n•
c
an 3
o o
p
0
Z
>
d
m
c
IDa
N c
c a O d c m
Z
Z
O
N
U d N 0
`°
�•
�
M L
� 3� 3
E�
d
d
QzQ
� J
a
ay,
❑
c
N
o E L
�a
U
Y
o
E a
H
o o
N N
N
cu
a
z
F O� w tN-
C
o m
r
`
a)0
...
¢
C
�n
v
O Q O N
O
cn
N
N
p w
E
c
o
m
�m:._
N
�,c a m
m❑
.c
`•
(7
d C9
a) 0
0
0¢
o
c d m d
To
E
c>
Z
d
d
AQ a
m c
U
U
U
.Ua
N
L-DY
C N
o
Z
'
E a ~O
w
O y
C N O
C
>
m
C
C
p
L
}
N
p L
t r c
C
C
>
C
d m w
a
d
N
U
a
p c m rn a
0
a
,
U
u
❑ T H O
C
'0
a
A d O C t9 N
Y
C
U
0)
C L LL
d
C
m U C N y O-
A
O
.n
F
N
7
O`
U C
N
O O d C a
V
A
V
N
U
c
o
y w� a)
d d o 0 Il
w
U
wa
D
o
t
'� N
••
c
c
n.
0
aEi a n.
A
w
a
o
Z
a—
0
a
N w 3
m a �'
C
7Of/N
azU
JE)
L
a
>
N
:s 0NQ
❑
m
3
(0
C
m
N
d N O.
> C O o« C
C
d
L
am,
O a N D_ w E L
3
d
y
_ O u
« b U p N
E d C
O
a
O
O
W (O d lCp O
>
O
C
O O c N Zl r N
W
O O L U —
N 0 M
N
Y
O
Z
Y co
a
a)m
a=
m e d 3
O
Z
U
E
N N
O
C
cV
«
3cc
O1
c M d V
>`
a)
Z~
m
v
a
U
o d r 0 a
O
m
O
a
-
_
m�
a o o o
y
�•
~
m
0
o�
CU
m
❑
�'u d 3 d d
3
0
cm
m o H m o m
m
�•
(7
d
w
d
C
N
N
C
m
L
W
w
O
C_
to
d
..
G
O
A
U
C
d
A
c
O
w
Q
fw
y
O
0
•
'
C
N
U
H
v
N
a
E
J
O
=
y
>
C
O
0
A
U
C
A
O.
>
G
m
V
N
A❑
U
> N
md
L
c
m
E
=
w
v
ZM
n
I
a
a
°
_
o"
d
Z 0
0
3
0
0
CO
o
n.
.�. a
.•
i�
r
..
C
L
L
�'
N
41
.�
❑
u .^y+
N O U
Co
V
U
NE
y
2
E
W
C
E
C
N
N
o
o
0£
«di
N
E
w
N
w
F
A
d
7❑
C
0
C
d
T
N
ao
U
C
M.O
J
m
U
Q
a
aL
m
y
`�
�'f,
v� O
m
W
o
m
c
o'm
R
Q
E
'A
U❑
R
EX
3
m
v
Of
o
d
o
U
3
d H
v W 0
A
U
d
$$
a
Y
d
z
ii
x
3
a
a
¢
0 _. a
n
z
b
E
¢
z
a❑
OCT 2 9 N"�'�
®CM_MHD CITY

3 w
� d
a : 7
O
m U
Z
O
y
Q f�
Y O
U 0 0)O
p
O 6) N
� U =
Z
O y
pp
N
d
m
O N
ry N
I�
i A
N N
p
C
N
R
C
=o m
c
=
0
J
mO
Z
L
m
0 g
a E a
u c
Of Z
m
Q J
N
A
L
~ n.O w rL
C
O � W
m rn w z
m 1°
oo
m m
Rom
`n
c 3
o LM
y
IX
U= p
rn
U
rn
3
0
Z
U
0
N
d
O` O
LL <A
O
L
R
O
a
ro
j m
o
n
m
r
U
_
C
N
y O
H
M
.
y
C O
N
N
W
U C
o�
m
a
CD
0 0
Z u
+
(D
O`
O
�a
c6
o
O'O
A
(n
d
I•'"' ai
_
O
Q'
J
In
r
cn
t)CM-MHD CITY

}\
-
§)�Z
;a
\
\/%
�
)
�
k$t
\
]7
(
)
\\�K
�a
z
2
>
}
)k
�(n
)
§
t £
} \
Eta
(§�
-
k
®
]
0 LU
»
LuwoLr,-
!
0
;
/ (2/
]
/ g§}
f
%
:t!13
-
\
0
0 m
G
_
\
(
)
) k
§
_
{
}
�\
�()�
(n
�
]=a
f}
/}
,
�)
0z
u .0
2.
3
_
§]
_
}
) \
A
}\
\
0
_
Z,
OCT 2§\ƒ]
DOM-MHU COY

0
()D
CR LU cu
LU -sap&
L
CL
0-
co — — — — — — —QQ
t
(L
V)
22
fo�
LU
CA
Lu
z
5�
LL
o cl
zz Oa o 00 6
o<
C
t_u
ui
SNF7d Avy a-VAOUddV
2
Urb
zu :�
uN
A, CD
o 6n
61
iz
6et,
88WTZ*Jffa "Logfoucl cru UOVYIN00
OCT 2 9 2'1`13
®CM-MHD CITY

\
§■
§|
� -
3 )
�
,
]
_
�
/
\
�
§
/
�/
/\
�
2
R �(/
\ 'Z»
/
I
RECEIVED
OCT 2§/29
�
--------------------------- ------------ ---- ------- --------------------------------------------------
DCWMHO-01-T-Y`

�y
z�
30
O
z
w
��
HW
a
z
=
Z
z
sl
Z
15
W �5
4
m
a
IT
c
m
Y
Z6
u
Ln
Q
Nd
a
3o
aF
z
Cy
0 3
V�
O
aC5S;.i -DIS Od -
n Y
OwC
Z6
m
ZZ
Q
CL
<
4p n
z
'ALL
3
1�
�
Knr
LU
w
o
W
3
o
so
II
Z
3a
N
00
.�
�Zo
W
3
Z
d
U>4tWii�U�4 �
ti
^goy 9.hN N
1Ytinn�n N 4
� WL:
(W `W�W Wat�W v�i
;�€{ate
����mmaaa a3<
O
+
Z
4
C
P
0
m
ur
�
�
O
t+
O
O
y
O
`
O
WWYi
�3
�n
0000
N �
0
0
0
0
0

h
W `I�
Nr
LL;ir
�
N
\
t
W
•
Q<
• �'
GG
iW
F�
m
s
y
�w
mm
P; y
mm
zz
I
4
00
NN
GO
U
e
a
<d
LL
m
!
N
vp
rt I
O
g�
G<
ox
iZ
00
m m
i
Z
O
TZ
00
LL;
N
�aa
N
0 L O '-IS 10a - -
.
Q
1
6
Q
Y
+
oc
J
on
a
W
�
n
VI H 1p1pnn N
U�4 U>WCWi�4 �
Q FZE z
Q . ^�Oy pNN A Fi
j � ^N1�tinnui N Q
Y Y p Y M Y 11 Y
W W W W a ¢ 2
V�W2�W�2� v�i gWp '
� WWCCC TWO
�����maaa a3Q
ntCE1VEp
OCT 2
--------------- ----- DOWMI!D-cr-r--Y-------

(\ t
!
)2=\m s
{(f)
w
z
§
/
(
] /
® �}
/ )> \
!<#_
f\\\\
eE=
ƒ3f
O
[ $ 2 § /S�5
ACM -AHD CITY

z
0
NW
w�
WNNJ~NN�m��
Nww
��n�pJQ
-
(—
�
U
U
�
®CIUI-IUIHD CITY

z
0
F Ln
a ¢ '�
w
cl' 3
G00 Ca00o
o
Fxo�us
E- o W
z ZO U
a
A �
p m
W
U
W
H
U
Q
a
w
w
N
lL
m
?
Z
O
oof
N
zW
z
gLL
LL
o
LU mo
Z
a
o
z
N
Q
F-
w
zo
C
ooL
m
oE
� LL
-
o
C
LU
J
d
U zo
D
v
RECEIVED
OCT 2 9 2018
DCM-MHD CITY

DocuSign Envelope ID: OEBA9949-76EF-4656-AA6F-524A5BFDDC1D
MINIMUM CRITERIA DETERMINATION CHECKLIST
TIP Project No. --
W.B.S. Project No. 17BP.2.R.88
Proiect Location: Bridge No. 135 over Rowland Creek on SR 1742 (Post Road) in Beaufort
County.
Proiect Description: The purpose of this project is to replace Beaufort County Bridge No. 135
on SR 1742 (Post Road) over Rowland Creek. Bridge No. 135 is 71 feet long with a deck width
of 26 feet. The replacement structure will be a bridge approximately 70 feet long providing a
minimum of 33 feet clear deck width. The bridge will include two 11-foot lanes and 2-foot
paved shoulders. The bridge length is based on preliminary design information and is set by
hydraulic requirements.
The approach roadway will extend approximately 0.07 mile on the sound end of the bridge and
0.06 mile on the north end of the bridge. The roadway will be designed using Sub -Regional Tier
Guidelines with a 60 mile per hour design speed.
Traffic will be detoured offsite 5.4 miles during construction.
Purpose and Need: NCDOT Bridge Management Unit records indicate Bridge No. 135 has a
sufficiency rating of 47.51 out of a possible 100 for a new structure.
Bridge No. 135 has timber elements that are 51 years old. Timber components have a typical life
expectancy between 40 and 50 years due to the natural deterioration rate of wood. Components
of the concrete superstructure and timber substructure have experienced an increasing degree of
deterioration; and it is no longer feasible to address this deterioration through maintenance
activities. The posted weight limits on the bridge are 26 tons for single vehicles and 31 tons for
truck -tractor semi -trailers. The bridge is approaching the end of its useful life. Replacement of
the bridge will result in safer traffic operations.
_Anticipated Permit or Consultation Requirements:
A Nationwide Permit 3 and corresponding Water Quality Certification 4085 will likely be
required for impacts resulting from this project.
In addition, the 404 Permit will likely be applicable. A NC Division of Water Resources
(NCDWR) Section 401 Water Quality General may be required prior to the issuance of a Section
404 Permit. Other required 401 certifications may include a GC 3366 for temporary construction
access and dewatering. The USACE holds the final discretion as to what permit will be required
to authorize project construction.
A Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA) General permit will be required for this project.
Special Proiect Information:
Environmental Commitments: The list of special project commitments (Greensheet) is located
at the end of the checklist.
Erosion Control: NCDOT sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices (BMPs)
will be used to contain on -site material.
RECEIVED
OCT 2 9 2018
DCM-MHD CITY

DocuSign Envelope ID: OEBA9949-76EF-4656-AA6F-524A5BFDDC1D
Estimated Cost:
The estimated cost is based on similar projects:
Construction: $945,000
Estimated Traffic:
2015 AADT = 360 vpd
2035 AADT = 720 vpd
Accidents: Analysis showed no crashes along SR 1742 (Post Road) in the vicinity of Bridge 249
from July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2018.
Design Exceptions: There are no design exceptions for this project.
Pedestrian and Bicycle Accommodations: This portion of SR 1742 (Post Road) is not part of a
designated bicycle route nor is it listed in the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP).
No temporary bicycle or pedestrian accommodations are required for this project.
Alternatives Discussion: Existing alignment was used to minimize impacts; therefore, no other
alternatives were discussed.
Other Agency Comments: NCDWR, NC Division of Coastal Management, and the US Army
Corps of Engineers did not have any additional comments.
Public Involvement: A landowner notification letter will be sent to all properties adjacent to
this project.
RECEIVED
OCT 2 9 2018
DCM-MHD CITY

DocuSign Envelope ID: OEBA9949-76EF-4656-AA6F-524A5BFDDC1D
PART A: MINIMUM CRITERIA
YES NO
1. Will the proposed project involve land disturbing activity of more than ten acres ❑
that will result in substantial, permanent changes in the natural cover or
topography of those lands?
2. Will the proposed project require the expenditure of more than ten million ❑
dollars in public funds?
3. Is the proposed project listed as a type and class of activity which would qualify ® ❑
as a Non -Major Action under the Minimum Criteria rules?
If "yes", under which category? 9
If "yes" is selected for either Question 1 or 2 and "no" is selected for Question 3, then the project does not
qualify as a Non -Major Action. A state environmental impact statement (SEIS) or state environmental
assessment (SEA) will be required.
PART B: MINIMUM CRITERIA EXCEPTIONS
YES NO
4. Does the proposed activity have a significant adverse effect on wetlands;
surface waters such as rivers, streams, and estuaries; parklands; prime or unique ❑
agricultural lands; or areas of recognized scenic, recreational, archaeological, or
historical value?
5. Will the proposed activity endanger the existence of a species on the ❑
Department of Interior's threatened and endangered species list?
6. Would the proposed activity cause significant changes in land use ❑
concentrations that would be expected to create adverse air quality impacts?
7. Would the proposed activity cause significant changes in land use ❑
concentrations that would be expected to create adverse water quality or
groundwater impacts?
8. Is the proposed activity expected to have a significant adverse effect on long- ❑
term recreational benefits?
9. Is the proposed activity expected to have a significant adverse effect on ❑
shellfish, finfish, wildlife, or their natural habitats?
10. Will the proposed activity have secondary impacts or cumulative impacts that ❑
may result in a significant adverse impact to human health or the environment?
11. Is the proposed activity of such an unusual nature or does the proposed
activity has such widespread implications, that an uncommon concern for
its environmental effects has been expressed to the NCDOT?
Note: If any of Questions 4 through 11 in part B are answered "YES", the proposed project does not
qualify as a Non -Major Action. A SEIS or SEA will be required.
RECEIVED
OCT 2 g `� "9
DCM-MHD CITY

DocuSign Envelope ID: OEBA9949-76EF-4656-AA6F-524A5BFDDCID
PART C: COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS
Ecological al Impacts
12. Is a federally protected threatened or endangered species, or its habitat, likely to
be impacted by the proposed action?
13. Does the action require the placement of fill in waters of the United
States?
14. Does the project require the placement of a significant amount of fill in high
quality or relatively rare wetland ecosystems, such as mountain bogs or pine
savannahs?
15. Does the project require stream relocation or channel changes?
16. Is the proposed action located in an Area of Environmental Concern, as defined
in the Coastal Area Management Act?
Cultural Resources
17. Will the project have an "effect" on a property or site listed on the National
Register of Historic Places?
18. Will the proposed action require acquisition of additional right of way from
publicly owned parkland or recreational areas?
YES NO
■ /1
■ ►1
■ ►1
■ /1
■ 01
RECEIVED
OCT 2 9 .
4
DCM-MHD CITY

DocuSign Envelope ID: OEBA9949-76EF-4656-AA6F-524A5BFDDC1D
Prepared By: DowS1gmW by:
8/14/2018 fAi� 46.sm
Date lftdfta14Elffffy Robinson, EI
Title: Transportation Planning Engineer
Firm: HNTB
Approved By: oocuBlg�ed by:
8[3-0/2018 %� G
Date ti�I`dge Program Manager
OocuSig�ed by:
8/16/2018
Date f�`t���l°��4@ ironmental Officer
DECEIVED
OCT 2 g 2018
DCM-MHD DIN

DocuSign Envelope ID: OEBA9949-76EF-4656-AA6F-524A5BFDDCID
PROJECT COMMITMENTS
17BP.2.R.88
Moratoria
A moratorium on in -water work will be in place from February 15 to September
30 of any given year.
Buffer Rules
The Tar -Pamlico River Buffer Regulations apply to this project. In accordance,
the proposed bridge will capture stormwater in a closed drainage system and
discharge downstream outside of the buffer.
FEMA Coordination
The Hydraulics Unit will coordinate with the NC Floodplain Mapping Program
(FMP), to determine the status of the project with regard to applicability of
NCDOT's Memorandum of Agreement, or approval of a Conditional Letter of
Map Revision (CLOMR) and subsequent final Letter of Map Revision (LOMR).
This project involves construction activities on or adjacent to FEMA-regulated
stream(s). Therefore, the Division shall submit sealed as -built construction plans
to the Hydraulics Unit upon completion of project construction, certifying that the
drainage structure(s) and roadway embankment that are located within the 100-
year floodplain were built as shown in the construction plans, both horizontally
and vertically.
RECE►vED
OCT 2
Minimum Criteria Determination Checklist DCNI-III fWeQ(WY
Green Sheet
August 2018

DocuSign Envelope ID: OEBA9949-76EF-4656-AA6F-524A5BFDDCID
`�c Beeckwi
. 5 {
✓ t it �"' i Roddmans QUIAitW t • • . s
J Bch
:w
1
t Vp
A;
�r Hunt -. r
t Brid
t
. w
is
Tatkard (CIA
NI
j
r
{.
i 4V.1.! J
Ban �� ! ;''
a
F
- r
r v a
a
f
Project Study Area •
`Location and extent is approximate #
a 1,000 2,000
Feet
Source: 2011 National Geographic Society/ESRI, icubed
seamless USGS quadrangles (Bath and Pinetown, NC); i
Project Study Area approximated by ES I.
Disclaimer: The information depicted on this figure is for
Informational purposes only and was not prepared for, and is -Pamlico River Basin
not suitable for legal or engineering purposes. f`-� Copyright:© 201
~ Project Location
Project: ER17005.06
Beaufort 135 Date: May 2017
C, T 2 2 Drwn/Chkd: LJ/RT
Beaufort County, North Carolina Wild Figure: 1
Path-. P:\GeoGra\Projects\2017\005\06\GIS\fig_proLloc. mxd Date 523M 17846. 11 AM

DocuSign Envelope ID: OEBA9949-76EF-4656-AA6F-524A5BFDDCID
DCM-MHD CITY

DocuSign Envelope ID: OEBA9949-76EF-4656-AA6F-524A5BFDDCID
_���.�.�.�ew�a�r�o��o�s�c��n�w�w�ow��gJur _.rwc.mza ua[e:wvtuii aaazi nm
DCM-MHD CITY

DocuSign Envelope ID: OEBA9949-76EF-4656-AA6F-524A5BFDDC1D
0(,,M-MHD CITY

DocuSign Envelope ID: OEBA9949-76EF-4656-AA6F-524A5BFDDC1D
Project Tracking No. (Internal Use
15-02-003 5
.r
G�► ♦ HISTORIC ARCHICTECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
R' NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
' This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
ITFIN is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
B-4430
County:
Beaufort
WBS No.:
17BP.2.R.88
Document
Type:
MCC
Fed. Aid No:
Funding:
State Federal
Federal
Permits :
Z Yes El No
Permit
T e(s):
USACE
Project Description:
Replace Bridge No 135 on SR 1742 (Post Rd) over Bath Creek.
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHICTECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
Description of review activities, results, and conclusions:
Review of HPO quad maps, relevant background reports, historic designations roster, and
indexes was undertaken on May 25, 2017. Based on this review there are no NR, DE, LL, SL, or
SS in the Area of Potential Effects (APE). This project was screened in February of 2015 and a
No Survey Required finding was issued. Since that time the project as changed to state funding
with federal permits and the study area has increased. There are no other standing structures in
the APE which are greater than 50 years of age. Beaufort County Bridge No. 135, built in 1967,
does not exemplify any distinctive engineering or aesthetic type and is not eligible for the
National Register of Historic Places. No survey is required.
Why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting that there
are no unidentified significant historic architectural or landscape resources in the project
area:
Using HPO GIS website and county tax data provides reliable information regarding the structures in the
APE. These combined utilities are considered valid for the purposes of determining the likelihood of
historic resources being present.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
®Map(s) ❑Previous Survey Info. ®Photos ❑Correspondence ❑Design Plans
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
Historic Architecture and Landscapes -- NO SURVEY REQUIRED
NCDOT Architectural Historian Date
RECEIVED
Historic Architecture and Landscapes No SURVEY REQUIRED form for Ahnor Dwisportation Projects as Qualified in the 1007 Programmatic Agreement.
Page 1 of 5
OCT 2 9 201
DCM-MHD CITY

DocuSign Envelope ID: OEBA9949-76EF-4656-AA6F-524A5BFDDC1D
Project Tracking No.:
15-02-0035
Revised
NO NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES` '
PRESENT FORM ai
'40 o This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not
�.` valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the
Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: B-4430 County: Beaufort
WBSNo: 33699.1.2 Document: Minimum Criteria
F.A. No: na Funding: ® State ❑ Federal
Federal Permit Required? ® Yes ❑ No Permit Type: NWP# 3 or 14
Project Description:
The project calls for the replacement of Bridge No. 135 on SR 1742 (Post Road) over Rowland Creek in
Beaufort County. The archaeological Area of Potential Effects (APE) for the project is defined as a
2, 000foot (609.60 m) long corridor running 1,000 feet (304.80 m) north and 1, 000feet south along Post
Road from the center of Bridge No. 135. The corridor is approximately 200 feet (60.96 m) wide
extending 100 feet (30.48 m) on either side of the road from its present center. This is a revised and
enlarged APE. The original "No National Register of Historic Places Eligible or Listed Archaeological
Sites Present or Affected Form " with the reduced APE was submitted on March 18, 2015. Funding for
the project has also changed from Federal to State. The original PA form is now void.
SUMMARY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL FINDINGS
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Archaeology Group reviewed
the subject project and determined:
® There are no National Register listed or eligible ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES present
within the project's area of potential effects. (Attach any notes or documents as needed)
❑ No subsurface archaeological investigations were required for this project.
® Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources.
® Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources
considered eligible for the National Register.
® All identified archaeological sites located within the APE have been considered and all
compliance for archaeological resources with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and GS 121-12(a) has been completed for this project.
RFCEIVED
"NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT" O ) 018
form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement. L
1of13
t)CM_MHD CITY

DocuSign Envelope ID: OEBA9949-76EF-4656-AA6F-524A5BFDDC1D
Project Tracla'ng No.:
15-02-0035
Revised
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
Bridge No. 135 is located north of Bath, east of Washington, and west of Yeatesville in the northern half of
Beaufort County, North Carolina. The project area is plotted in the southeastern portion of the Pinetown
USGS 7.5' topographic quadrangle (Figure 1).
A map review and site file search was conducted at the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) on February 19,
2015. No previously recorded archaeological sites are recorded within the APE, but one site (31BF73) is
reported with a mile of the bridge. According to the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
online data base (HPOWEB 2015), there are no known historic architectural resources within the APE that
may yield intact archaeological deposits. Topographic maps, USDA soil survey maps, aerial photographs
(NC One Map), and historic maps (North Carolina maps website) were examined for information on
environmental and cultural variables that may have contributed to prehistoric or historic settlement within
the project limits and to assess the level of ground disturbance. An archaeological field investigation was
carried out on March 11, 2015, to evaluate the project area. A revisit to the project area to conduct work
within the expanded APE was conducted on June 7, 2017.
Bridge No. 135 and Post Road cross Rowland Creek roughly north to south. The stream drains to the west
and is a tributary to Bath Creek. These waterways are part of the Tar -Pamlico drainage basin. The APE
consists of a floodplain with stream terraces to the north and south (Figure 2). Ground disturbance is
minimal to moderate with the greatest disturbance coming from the previous road alignment to the west of
Post Road and a push pile of debris to the northwest. Properties consist of a forested swamp primarily to
the east, residential lawns to the southwest, an overgrown agricultural field to the southeast, a clear cut
utility corridor to the northwest, and cultivated fields at either ends of the APE (Figures 3-6).
The APE is composed of two soil types according to the USDA soil survey map (see Figure 2). The
floodplain is made up of Muckalee loam (Me). The series is nearly level, poorly drained, and subject to
frequent flooding. It is unlikely to yield any significant cultural resources associated with early settlement
activities due to being persistently wet. Altavista find sandy loam (AvA) is present on the stream terraces.
This series is moderately well drained with a slope of less than 2 percent. It is possible for intact deposits
to be present on this soil type due to it being dry with little slope and minimal disturbance. As a result,
subsurface testing was required for this series.
A review of the site files suggest that B-4430 might have been previously reviewed by OSA, but no
Environmental Review (ER) number associated with the project could be found. Several investigations
have been conducted in the area, but most all have been carried out over a mile away. Only one site
(31BF73) is in the vicinity of the bridge. Site 31BF73 was first identified by the University of North
Carolina at Chapel Hill in 1956. It is prehistoric site dating to an unknown time period and situated on the
western bank of Bath Creek. Its eligible for the National Register has yet to be assessed. Overall, more
work is needed in the area to better understand site placement in this portion of the county.
A historic map review was conducted prior to field work as well. Most early maps from the 18th and 19th
centuries provide only general details concerning the region illustrating just major roads, settlements, and
drainages. An approximate location for the road and crossing can be found on Henry Mouzon's 1775 map
of North Carolina (Figure 7). This map shows the old Post Road or "King's Road" that ran from Boston to
Wilmington. It closely follows the alignment of the current Post Road, but the exact route is unclear. Later
maps such as the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey of 1874 provide a highly detail picture of the Pamlico
River and surrounding area (Figure 8). Here, the road and crossing over Rowland Creek are illustrated at
or near the current bridge location, but no structures are plotted in the vicinity. Early 20th century maps
show a more modern layout for Post Road. The 1908 Geological and Economy Survey map of Beaufort
"NO NA77ONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT" RECEIVED
form for the Amended Minor 7-ansportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
2of13
OCT 2 920118
DCM-MHD CITY

DocuSign Envelope ID: OEBA9949-76EF-4656-AA6F-524A5BFDDCID
Project Tracking No.:
15-02-0035
Revised
County plots the current road alignment with no structures (Figure 9). Later maps provide no other useful
information. As a result, it is unlikely for any deposits associated with former significant structures to be
encountered, but remnants of the old Post Road might have been present within the APE. The possibility
of this road required a reconnaissance of the project area.
The archaeological field investigation at Bridge No. 135 consisted of a surface inspection followed by five
shovel test placements (STPs) (STP# 1-5) along the stream terraces north and south of the bridge during
the initial investigations in 2015 (see Figure 2). Subsequent work during the 2017 revisit included the
excavation of 25 (STP# 6-30) additional STPs.
The surface inspection identified an earthwork feature recognized as a likely mill dam east of Post Road
and running from the northwest to southeast (see Figure 2). It was recorded as archaeological site
31BF427. The dam is approximately 2 to 3 in (ca. 7 to 10 ft) high at the creek's edge and approximately 1
in (ca. 3 ft) wide (Figures 10-12). The dam is heavily damaged and no longer crosses Rowland Creek. It
appears that soil from the dam has been borrowed with a large gap in its northern section and several
circular pits found throughout. The northern half is approximately 32 in (ca. 105 ft) in length stretching
from road to the creek. The southern portion is approximately 72 in (ca. 236 ft) long with a bend to the
east. This section runs from the creek to a gravel access road, but it could extend further south. A Lidar
image of the site was used to help distinguish feature that might have been missed during the surface
inspection (Figure 13). The dam is clearly defined north of the gravel access road, but becomes mixed with
the road berm once the two meet. The site boundaries are based on the clearly defined portion of the dam.
The remains of no structures were found along the dam, but the Lidar image hints a depressed square
outline just outside the APE on the stream terrace to the northeast (see Figure 13). This is likely the
remains of a former farm structure (barn) or house not associated with the dam. The field inspection could
not identify any structural material in this particular area other than the depression. As a result of its non -
association, it was not included as part of the site. No subsurface tests were carried out on the Site
31BF427, since standing water surrounded the dam and no evidence of a structure was apparent on the
feature. The dam probably dates to the 19th or early 20th century, but no suggestion of a mill could be
found on maps or in the written record. Site 31BF427 is recommended as not eligible for the National
Register of Historic Places due to being insignificant in the historic record and a lack of integrity cause by
ground disturbance.
Subsurface testing, however, was carried out along the stream terraces. Eighteen were placed to the south
with nine each in the southeast and southwest quadrants, while 12 were excavated to the north with seven
in the northeast quadrant and five in the northwest. STPs were plotted approximately 30 in (ca. 98 ft) apart.
No STPs were excavated in the floodplain due to poor soils and/or standing water. The stratigraphy
general consists of three soil layers. The upper layer is a 10 to 25 cm (ca. 4 to 10 in) thick very dark gray
(IOYR 3/1) loam near the edge of the terraces or a dark yellowish brown (IOYR 4/4) loamy sand in the
cultivated fields. It is followed by a 10 to 15 cm (ca. 4 to 6 in) layer of brownish yellow (1 OYR 6/6) sandy
loam at the edge of the terraces or a light yellowish brown (2.5Y 6/4) sandy loam in the fields. Last,
subsoil is a strong brown (7.5YR 5/8) sandy clay loam that extends to at least 55 cm (ca. 22 in) below the
surface. No cultural material was identified in any of the STPs. The wooden remains of an earlier bridge
were identified in the water and along the banks just west of the current bridge (Figure 14 and 15). These
appear to date from the early 20th century and represent an earlier road alignment for Post Road. It is
likely that this earlier road follows the same path as the old Post Road or "King's Road." Although the
alignment of the old Post Road can be speculated, no road traces remain on the landform to the north and
south of Rowland Creek.
The revised archaeological investigations for the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 135 show that no
significant archaeological sites are within the APE. Although historic site 31 BF427 was identified during
the surface inspection, the site is heavily damaged and has no historic significances. Subsurface testing
also failed to provide any contributing material to the site. As a result of the current investigation, no
"NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT" RECEIVED
form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 1007 Programmatic Agreement.
3of13
OCT 2 9 2018

DocuSign Envelope ID: OEBA9949-76EF-4656-AA6F-524A5BFDDCID
Project Tracking No.:
15-02-0035
Revised
further archaeological work is required for replacement of Bridge No. 135 in Beaufort County. However,
additional work will be required should design plans change to encompass property outside of the currently
defined APE.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: ® Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info
Signed:
C. D:
Jones
NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
® Photos ❑Correspondence
6/9/ 17
Date
"NO NA77ONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT"
form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
4of13
RECEIVED
OCT 2 9 2018
DCM-MHD CITY

Lane, Stephen
From:
Sent:
Ward, Garcy
Friday, November 30, 2018 5:19 PM
To:
Cc:
Lane, Heather C
Steffens, Thomas A SAW; Lane, Stephen; Johnson, Jay B; Carpenter,Kristi; Robert
Turnbull
Subject:
Beaufort 135
Heather,
I've reviewed your application for the replacement of Bridge No. 135 over Rowland Creek on SR 1742 (Post Rd) in
Beaufort County (DWR project # 20181404). Water Quality General Certification No. 4132 is issued for this activity(
https //edocs deg nc gov/WaterResources/DocView aspx?dbid=0&id=613092&page=1&cr1). The Buffer Authorization
for this project will be issued by DCM in accordance with the MOU with DWR. Therefore written approval is not
required for use of GC 4132 provided all the conditions can be met. An in -water work moratorium is in effect from
February 15 —June 30. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks.
Garcy Ward
Environmental Senior Specialist
North Carolina Division of Water Resources
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
ph: 252-946-6481