NCDOT - 70427

M6AMA / ❑ DREDGE & FILL N2 70427 A B (�C D
GENERAL. PERMIT Previous permit #
[3New ❑Modification ❑Complete Reissue ❑Partial Reissue Date previous permit issued
As authorized by the State of North Carolina, Department of Environmental Quality D -7 1,� 16
U 01 ) 3.�
1
and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant to 15A NCAC [mules attached.
D Project Location: County
Applicant Name Y i p e 43y
Address S S O j �� r &'� ` ` , po v Street Address/ State Road/ Lot #(s) P r
<Y,.e State N C ZIP -'r11�� �r U.71 ,,;Iej' T,�.�1� of SR ILI
City
�1 037 � t„/er� f�{�. j �,�� s�.'t �a /Subdivision
Phone # ( `3 E-Mail yy
Authorized Agent
�r�e �, el,e W Rr-' A. City %���ylV i t')r /1/ C ZIP
R
Affected CW ❑ EW EV,&A ❑ ES CA6S
AEC(s): ❑ oEA ❑ HHF ❑ IH ElUSA ElN/A
❑ PWS:
ORW ves / Rio`, PNA yes / o-)
Phone # ( ) River Basin W ^' ' ` -
Adj. Wtr. Body J-4. r k f f { ; t man unkn
Closest Maj. Wtr. Body
Type of Project/ Activity
a o c e "tke
�c t /� I n �,� 1�, e
, 4-j�
�+ 3 3'
W i �+ e
X
C V r -e J J1,, � 1
E�.v
(Scale:
Pier (dock) length _
Fixed Platform(s)
Floating Platform(s)
Finger pier(s)
Groin length `
number
Bulkhead/ Riprap length
avg distance offshore
max distance offshore
Basin, channel
cubic yards_
Boat ramp
Boathouse/ Boatlift
Beach Bulldozing -
Other
33' x 8J' I"iwR
Z. 91, of a► ,. �`+�
/ r
60� of -
Shoreline
Length
SAV: not sure yes no
Moratorium: n/a yes U0
Photos: yes no
Waiver Attached: yes
�l,�n/ C�u�,y
A building permit may be required by: o�,❑See note on back regarding River Basin rules.
(
Note Local Planningjurisdiction) -f i /e j � ��-'�'`�e �'K' j�%�•� �jrl��� J' < �i �. F e_a�.. vt_..� I r 1 �/' k:..�. { `�
Notes/ Special Conditions L ee // t -
,� v i i•'i r� N A p �k e/ j��?.RJ'L � t X
-rfow +Ke v rr:G. b.
Ay)neliesc Wes-h?ko I
Agent or Applicant Printed Name ' —�
Signature * Please read complia ce statement on back of permit
_" o o. o o WOJ�H 17 Of 3. R . S"6
r L 1 I
Permit Officer's Print Name
Signature f
Application Fee(s) Check# Issuing Date r t:xpiration uate

Statement of Compliance and Consistency
This permit is subject to compliance with this application, site drawing and attached general and specific conditions. Any
violation of these terms may subject the permittee to a fine or criminal or civil action; and may cause the permit to become
null and void.
This permit must be on the project site and accessible to the permit officer when the project is inspected for compliance. The
applicant certifies by signing this permit that 1) prior to undertaking any activities authorized by this permit, the applicant will
confer with appropriate local authorities to confirm that this project is consistent with the local land use plan and all local
ordinances, and 2) a written statement or certified mail return receipt has been obtained from the adjacent riparian
landowner(s) .
The State of North Carolina and the Division of Coastal Management, in issuing this permit under the best available
information and belief, certify that this project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal Management Program.
River Basin Rules Applicable To Your Project:
Tar - Pamlico River Basin Buffer Rules Other:
Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules
If indicated on front of permit, your project is subject to the Environmental Management Commission's Buffer Rules for the
River Basin checked above due to its location within that River Basin. These buffer rules are enforced by the NC Division of
Water Resources. Contact the Division of Water Resources at the Washington Regional Office (252-946-6481) or the
Wilmington Regional Office (910-796-7215) for more information on how to comply with these buffer rules.
Division of Coastal Management Offices
Morehead City Headquarters
400 Commerce Ave
Morehead City, NC 28557
252-808-2808/ 1-888ARCOAST
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Carteret, Craven, Onslow -
North of New River Inlet- and Pamlico
Counties)
Elizabeth City District
401 S. Griffin St.
Ste. 300
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
252-264-3901
Fax:[phone]
(Serves: Camden, Chowan, Currituck,
Dare, Gates, Pasquotank and Perquimans
Counties)
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/cm/dcm-home
Washington District
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
252-946-6481
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Beaufort, Bertie, Hertford, Hyde,
Tyrrell and Washington Counties)
Wilmington District
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
910-796-7215
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Brunswick, New Hanover,
Onslow - South of New River Inlet -
and Pender Counties)
Revised 7/06/ 17

NC Division. of Coastal Mgt. Application Computer Sheet, Page 3 of 4)
Applicant: ,%iPb (S-19 -7
Date: ? D - f
Describe below the HABITAT disturbances for the' application. All values should match the name, and units of measurement
found in your Habitat code sheet.
TOTAL Sq. Ft.
FINAL Sq. Ft.
TOTAL Feet
FINAL Feet
(Applied for.
(Anticipated final
(Applied for.
(Anticipated final
DISTURB TYPE
Disturbance total
disturbance.
Disturbance
disturbance.
Habitat Name
Chooseincludes
One
any
Excludes any
total includes
Excludes any
anticipated
restoration
any anticipated
restoration and/or
restoration or
and/or temp
restoration or
temp impact
temp impacts)
impact amount
temp impacts)
amount)
r
��
o
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other Cj"'
1A J-A C "
`i0 ki WL�A^�J
Dredge ❑ Fill TIOBoth ❑ Other 3"
�'
G
�1 J'R-( C
4 Wyk,^i/
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ["
3 J ?
3 3�
tar/}- c c
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other
3
ZZ?
1r
LA, m M Wdl ^
Dredge ❑ Fill B' Both ❑ Other ❑
� �
/ 9
Dredge [g"' Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
I l ? o 7
D
Dredge ❑ Fill Er Both ElOther ❑
b U
Dredge ❑ Fill [Both ❑ Other ❑
3/ � -7 2-
3i ?
�if U
3 2
/ l
Dredge 9" Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge EFill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastaimanagement.net . revised: 02115/10

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Roy COOPER TAMES H. TROGDON, III
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
April 11, 2018
Al10 C H V1 ,14 0(l
Mr. Stephen Lane 81 N E 1 d d d
Coastal Management Representative, Transportation Projects
Division of Coastal Management (33A13 :03 8
400 Commerce Ave.
Morehead City, NC 28557
Subject: Application for Sections .1600 and .2300 General Permit for Replacement of Existing
Bridges, etc. for Onslow Bridge #11 (660011) over Starkys Creek on SR 1434 Belgrade
Swansboro Rd.
WBS number: 17BP.3.R.56
Dear Mr. Lane:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) is proposing to replace Onslow Bridge
Number 11 on SR 1434 Belgrade Swansboro Road in Onslow County. The bridge spans Starkeys
Creek and is located 0.77 mile north of SR 1428 Riggs Road. The existing bridge is a 2-span with
both at 35' long. The proposed bridge is a 2-span with 1 @ 25' and 1 @55' cored slab. The proposed
bridge will provide a setback from the banks and shift the interior bent away from the stream
channel.
Please find enclosed the completed DCM MP-1 and DCM MP-5 applications detailing NCDOT's
proposal under Sections .1600 and .2300 General Permits. NCDOT plans to utilize the
authorizations of the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Nationwide Permit 3 and Department
of Environmental Quality, Division of Water Resources (DEQ, DWR) Water Quality General
Certification No. 4132.
In addition to the MP-1 and MP-2 applications, please find attached:
1. A topo map of the bridge location
2. "No survey required" forms for archaeology and historic architecture
3. Copies of the letters sent to the adjacent riparian property owners
4. Original signed and returned green cards from the certified mail notice
5. Permit drawings detailing the project impacts, including a wetland and surface water impacts
summary (table)
6. A partial plan set including utilities and utilities by others plan sheets
Due to a geotechnical finding, Onslow Bridge 11 will require drilled piers with permanent steel
casings at the interior bent. As shown on the permit drawings, temporary excavation is shown in
high ground where the slope will be excavated so that equipment can access the interior bent. Mats
will also be used on the same side in front of proposed end bent 1. These mats will also facilitate

equipment access for the drilled piers and the area is called out on the permit drawings (vicinity of
-L- Sta. 15+00).
The department anticipates that a permit fee of $400.00 will be charged to the subject WBS element
number.
Please let me know if I can provide any further information.
Sincerely,
Anneliese Westphal
NCDOT Division 3
Environmental Senior Specialist
cc: Mason Herndon, NCDOT, Division 3 Environmental Program Supervisor (electronic)
Enclosures

APPLICATION for
Maier Development Permit
(last revised 12/27/06)
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1. Primary Applicant/ Landowner Information
Business Name
Ncdot Division Three
Project Name (if applicable)
Replace Bridge No. 660011 over Starkys Creek
Applicant 1: First Name
Anneliese
MI
Last Name
Westphal
Applicant 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
If additional applicants, please attach an additional page(s) with names listed.
Mailing Address
5501 Barbados Blvd.
PO Box
City
Castle Hayne
State
NC
ZIP
28429
Country
USA
Phone No.
910 - 341 - 2037 ext.
FAX No.
910 - 675 - 0143
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
[e-mail]
2. Agent/Contractor Information
Business Name
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
ZIP
Phone No. 1
-
- ext.
Phone No. 2
- - ext.
FAX No.
Contractor #
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
<Form continues on back>
APR 13 Z0�8
2 5 2 - 8 0 8 - 2 8 0 8 .. 1-888-4RCOAST .. www.nccoastalmanag M--MH0''

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 2 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
3. Project Location
County (can be multiple)
Street Address
State Rd. #
Onslow
1434
Subdivision Name
City
State
Zip
Belgrade
NC
-
Phone No.
Lot No.(s) (if many, attach additional page with list)
- - ext.
, , I ,
a. In which NC river basin is the project located?
b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
White Oak
Starkys Creek
c. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade?
d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
®Natural ❑Manmade ❑Unknown
White Oak River
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
f. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
❑Yes NNo
work falls within.
N/A
4. Site Description
a. Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.)
b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.)
N/A
c. Size of individual lot(s)
d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
N/A, I I
NW L (normal water level)
(If many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list)
6.0 ft. ❑NHW or NNWL
e. Vegetation on tract
Mowed roadside and forestland.
f. Man-made features and uses now on tract
Bridge 660011 and SR 1434.
g. Identify and describe the existing land uses adjacent to the proposed project site.
Forested wetland.
h. How does local government zone the tract?
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
N/A
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
❑Yes ❑No NNA
j. Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? ❑Yes NNo
k. Hasa professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. ❑Yes NNo El NA
If yes, by whom? See attached "no survey required"
form.
I. Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a ❑Yes NNo ❑NA
National Register listed or eligible property?
RhUt1V r_V
<Form continues on next page>
APR 1.3 2018
252-808-2808 .. 1-888-4RCOAST .. www.nccoastalrnana90",1J 1HD Y

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 3 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
m. (i) Are there wetlands on the site? ®Yes []No
(ii) Are there coastal wetlands on the site? ❑Yes ®No
(iii) If yes to either (i) or (ii) above, has a delineation been conducted? ®Yes []No
(Attach documentation, if available)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
None
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
None
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems.
None
5. Activities and Impacts
a.
Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use? ❑Commercial ® Public/Government
❑ Private/Community
b.
Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
The purposes of the project are to replace the existing bridge and improve the level of service for the traveling public.
c.
Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
Typical highway and bridge construction vehicles and equipment will be used, including, but not limited to, dump trucks,
cranes, graders, and bull dozers. Storage and staging areas will be located on uplands. Drilled piers with permanent steel
casings will be installed at the interior bent. Temporary excavation and mats will be used as shown on the permit drawings
to access the interior bent.
d.
List all development activities you propose.
Removal of the existing bridge. Installation of the new bridge. Grading, paving, clearing, ditch work, excavation and fill
associated with the roadway and bridge work.
e.
Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? Maintenance/replacement of existing
structures.
f.
What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project? 0.6 ❑Sq.Ft or ®Acres
g.
Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
that the public has established use of?
h.
Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
Stormwater runoff on the existing bridge discharges directly into the water by running off the side of bridge below barrier rail
along the full length of the bridge. The proposed bridge will have no direct discharge into the water as the water will be
directed away from the surface water through pipe outlet. The proposed pipe outlet has a rip rap pad to dissipate energy
before entering the wetlands northwest of the proposed bridge. Minimal fill from the rip rap pad will result based upon the
pipe outlet not being pulled back from the wetlands due to the depth of the pipe vs. the height of the fill slope/existing ground.
Mechanized clearing is proposed in 4 locations in the wetland along the west side of the road.
I.
Will wastewater or stormwater be discharged into a wetland? ®Yes ❑ No ❑NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water? ❑Yes ❑No ®NA
j.
Is there any mitigation proposed? ❑Yes ®No
§tCEINIED
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal.
APR � 3 20113
2 5 2 - 8 0 8 - 2 8 0 8 .. 1-888-4RCOAST .. www.nccoastalmanagD e M , HL) ,11iY

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 4 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
<Form continues on back>
6. Additional Information
In addition to this completed application form, (MP-1) the following items below, if applicable, must be submitted in order for the application
package to be complete. Items (a) — (0 are always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
instruction booklet on how to properly prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
f. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name Phone No.
Address
Name Phone No.
Address
Name Phone No.
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, if applicable.
i. Wetland delineation, if necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10), if necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
7. Certification and Permission to Enter on Land
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Date
April 11, 2018.
Print Name Anneliese Westphal
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed project.
❑DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information ®DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts�����
❑DCM MP-3 Upland Development
❑DCM MP-4 Structures Information
APR 1.3 201a
252-808-2808 .. 1-888.4RCOAST .. www.nccoastaimanagement.net

Form OtMM1d
BRIDGES and CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
1. BRIDGES ❑ This section not applicable
a. Is the proposed bridge:
❑Commercial ®Public/Government ❑Private/Community
c. Type of bridge (construction material):
2-span cored slab
e. (i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge: 70 ft.
(iii) Width of existing bridge: 30.25 ft,
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge: 6.1 ft.
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain) Yes - all of the existing structure will be
removed using standard NCDOT practices for bridge
demolition.
g. Length of proposed bridge: 80 ft.
i. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow? ®Yes []No
If yes, explain: The existing water flow will be less restricted
as the proposed bridge has a longer span over the
water. It will also be 10 ft. longer, providing
additional flood passage.
b. Water body to be crossed by bridge:
Starkys Creek
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at N LW or N W L:
2.8 ft.
f. (i)Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert? ❑Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert:
(iii) Width of existing culvert:
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NW L:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
h. Width of proposed bridge: 33 ft.
j. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by reducinLor
increasing the existing navigable opening? IAYes ❑No
If yes, explain: The existing navigable opening will be
increased due to lengthening of the span from 35 ft. to 55
ft. over the water, eliminating a bent from the water.
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge: 6.1 ft. I. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard concerning their
approval? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain:
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing no navigable
waters? ®Yes ❑No
If yes, explain: The wetlands are associated with Public
Trust Waters but not Section 10 navigable waters.
2. CULVERTS
a. Number of culverts proposed:
n. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands: N/A
b. Water body in which the culvert is
® This section not applicable
APR 1 3 2018
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastalmanaaement.net DCNI- M HOI.CfTy/06

Form DCM MP-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 2 of 4)
< Form continues on back>
c. Type of culvert (construction material):
d. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
❑Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge:
(iii) Width of existing bridge:
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain)
e. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
❑Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert(s):
(iii) Width of existing culvert(s):
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NW L:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
f. Length of proposed culvert: g. Width of proposed culvert:
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the NHW or NWL. i. Depth of culvert to be buried below existing bottom contour.
j. Will the proposed culvert affect navigation by reducing or k. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
increasing the existing navigable opening? []Yes ❑No El Yes ❑No
If yes, explain: If yes, explain:
3. EXCAVATION and FILL ❑ This section not applicable
a. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation below the NHW or NW L? ❑Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated:
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated:
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated:
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards:
b. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW ), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SIB), or other wetlands
(W L)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
❑WL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
M
mi
APR 112018
DCM- MHD CITY
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastalmanagement.net revised:10/26106

Form DCM MP-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 3 of 4)
c. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
high -ground excavation? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated: 8 ft.(+25 ft. temp.)
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated: 33 ft.(+30 ft temp
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated: 2 ft.(+4 ft temp.)
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards: 19.68
(+111 cu. yards temp.)
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any excavation, please complete the following:
(i) Location of the spoil disposal area: Approved NCDOT waste disposal site.
e.
9•
(ii) Dimensions of the spoil disposal area: To be determined
(iii) Do you claim title to the disposal area? ®Yes ❑No (ff no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.)
(iv) Will the disposal area be available for future maintenance? ®Yes ❑No
(v) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh (CW ), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAVs), other wetlands (W L), or shell
bottom (SB)?
❑CW ❑SAV OWL ❑SB ®None
If any boxes are checked, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
(vi) Does the disposal area include any area below the NHW or NWL? ? []Yes ®No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
(i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed below NHW or NWL? ❑Yes MNo
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled:
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled:
(iv) Purpose of fill:
(i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed on high -ground? ❑Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled:
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled:
(iv) Purpose of fill:
4. GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project require the relocation of any existing b.
utility lines? ®Yes ❑No
If yes, explain: Relocation of wate line (open trench and
trenchless) and telecommunications (Century Link).
(i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW ), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SIB), or other wetlands
(W L)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
EWL 267.8 salt ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
The purpose of the fill in this area is for a riprap pad at a
pipe outlet.
APR 1; 3 2018
DCM- ME") CITY
Will the proposed project require the construction of any temporary
detour structures? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain:
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.necoastaimanagement.net
revised: 10/26/06

Form DCM MP-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 4 of 4)
If this portion of the proposed project has ahready received
approval from local authorities, please attach a copy of the
approval or certification.
< Form continues on back>
c. Will the proposed project require any work channels? d. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion
❑Yes ®No controlled?
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2. NCDOT Sediment and Erosion Control BMPs
e. What type of construction equipment will be used (for example,
dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
Crane, dump truck, excavator and other standard
construction equipment
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert re uire an
shoreline stabilization? Yes LgNo
If yes, complete form MP-2, Section 3 for Shoreline
Stabilization only.
April 11, 2018
Date
Onslow Bridge 11
Project Name
Anneliese Westphal
Applicant Name
Applicant Signature
f. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project site?
❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
RECEIVED
APR 1 3 ZOi�
DCM- MH CITY
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastalmanagement.net revised: 10/26/06

Onslow Bridge 11 - Topo Map
�t � JONES
sJiL.�f16
Q1 V
1
ti x
.cra19 0 o
t` c z ... y {. i � ?S _ '•+" ice,. "M'
__--
\ ON001F• David Sind s,V=+-
T Aman Huse 1977j. 0N05$9s ohn Wobert
p : 01 402At'Hlouse^-•r - •J ���' j ; c White House + ,"• •4
N0480 ftlggs-h�t�'xt %
Ear m •, .+ - _ 'iy,
�.
qw-
ol
u• ON SLOW=-
Oy =�
Q �Nil�iledt :..: rg y Wyss ~ �i
Seh
4 �
*~ S'+4n # 0355 Edam "d k1orton �zQsa r
House}
u h
i •3.T
Z•Q 7jj
1-106,
• .jf'- _ ': �,'1 f-._�
December 20, 2016
RECEIVED 1:25,820
NR Points 0 0.2 0.4 0.8 mi
NRHD Center Point Boundary of Destroyed/Removed NR Listing
• NR Individual Listing NR Boundaries APr-? 1 8 0 0.35 0.7 1.4 km
Copyright©2013National Geographic Society, Fcubed
NR Listing, Gone F-1 National Register Boundary DCM- 1'V1 H a 01' 1TY

Project Tracking No.:
16-12-0029
oo NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY RE '.
A o > QUIRED FORM
6�
is a. This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not t;
valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the F ®a
Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: Br. No. 0011 County: Onslow
WBS No: 17BP.3.R.56 Document: M.C.C.
F.A. No. Funding: ® State ❑ Federal
Federal Permit Required? ® Yes ❑ No Permit Type: usace, wqc
Project Description: NCDOT proposes to replace Bridge No. 0011 on SR 1434 (Bellgrade-Swansboro
Rd.) over Starkey's Creek in eastern Onslow County. Detailed design mapping was not available at the
time of the review. This is proposed as a replace -in -place bridge with an offsite detour. The new bridge
may feature a wider deck or may be higher and new ROW and/or construction easements may be required
for fill, cuts and drainage that exceed the existing ROW and soil disturbances along the margins of the
project. For purposes of this archaeological review, the archaeological Area of Potential Effects (APE)
is approximately 100 feet wide. A maximum project length of about 700 feet is expected. This is a state
funded project, however, a permit is anticipated from USACE (and possibly also WQC and CAMA),
therefore, this is a federal undertaking and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act applies
for archaeological review.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
USGS mapping (Stella) and aerial photography was studied (see Figures 1 and 2). The immediate
surroundings along SR 1434 and Bridge No. 0011 are undeveloped wooded parcels with no residences
or businesses in or adjacent to APE. Utility easements are present crossing parallel with the APE
including a possible water or sewage line next to the bridge on the west side. Beyond the APE area
scattered residences, an athletic complex on the south (located at Tabernacle/White Oak School marked
on USGS mapping) and a cemetery on higher ground northeast of the project.
One soil type dominates the project APE, the aptly named Muckalee loam (Mk). This soil is poorly
drained and frequently flooded. Due to the general undesirable nature of low, wet soils for human
occupation, the probability for archaeological sites to be present is low. Raising to the south, a smaller
percentage of the sloped Marvyn loamy fine sand (MaC) is present near Collingwood Lane. Due to the
frequency of flooding of Mk and the marginal impacts and slope towards the southern APE, these soils
suggest a lowered probability for the presence of archaeological sites, especially those that might have
intact, signifance remains eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places.
Virtual drive -by was available using Bing Maps. Conditions at the street -level show the wooded parcels
as low-lying, but standing water is not present. No cemeteries or other interested elements were noted
Wept northeast of the project where a cemetery was seen which also appears on new and historic USGS
gypping as well as the NC Cemetery GIS database maintained by NCDOT archaeologist Paul J. Mohler.
4ris cemetery is outside of the APE and will not be affected by the project.
.. Do Office of State Archaeology was visited in January, 2017, to review archaeological mapping and
�. Zerence any known archaeological surveys and sites. The entire northeast quadrant of APE and more,
''' acres, is noted as having had an archaeological review (CH 16-1577) for a potential solar farm.
n 'le there doesn't appear to have been an archaeological survey, one site, 310n159, is mapped a
W Q Ince east of the APE at the margin of the field and will not be impacted by the project. This review
ted as "I" for inactive, which suggests that the solar farm was located elsewhere or that no further
"No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED "form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
1 of4

Project Tracking No.:
16-12-0029
assessment was appropriate. The John Robert White House (HPO - 3100569, ER 09-2177) is located
south of the project near Morton Fork crossroads. It is interested to note that an elevated landform on
White Oak River about 9000 feet to the northeast was surveyed (ER 92-7580, Bibliography 3616) and
contained archaeological remains (31 Jn96, 31 Jn97, 31 Jn98 and 31 Jn99) on that better drained landform
near a larger source of water. These were generally very small while 31Jn96 was larger, perhaps with
an African American affiliation.
For this undertaking, the proposed replace in place bridge project will have a relatively confined
construction footprint. An offsite detour is available for use. New ROW or easements maybe required
and the construction footprint may expand, however, the soils present are not highly favorable for
archaeological sites. Because there is reduced chance for an archaeological sites to be present, especially
ones that might be intact and significant, no archaeological survey is recommended for this undertaking
as currently proposed.
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
This project involves replacing a bridge in place with an offsite detour. While some new ROW or
easements may be required, existing disturbances associated by the construction of the current facility
and the nature of the low landform and soils suggests a low probability for encountering archaeological
sites, especially ones that might be eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. No known
archaeological sites will be affected by the project. No archaeological survey is recommended.
Therefore, this federally permitted undertaking should be considered compliant with Section 106.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: ® Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info ❑ Photos ❑Correspondence
❑ Photocopy of County Survey Notes Other:
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
"No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQU/RED "form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 201 S Programmatic Agreement.
2 of 4

Project Tracking No.:
16-12-0029
'a 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 Feet
01
GOC
l'•,,�� / � „y -ir y�, •� ,yam •,rr „�„ :p� ,ylr, :wA,.
'�.. •. p . � q -!• it .�,. —. -s. _� 4 �+ �F -.
.s _ '{/�} do ;Cs � �, '^ �,++.. •�► 4 rr. I-
e C _ /j]��Q/�� /�/J /�/�/J 9���'//J/J`/►�//J/J/�9l/j_J/}J:�." _ ...
Ji S ii Ji Vf� ii0 VYYI�O/ "` •+'-� ter-
9� ., ,�._ r 1, v��A t� tom✓ !-Y 4-
Sta Py,y - :-- - —a
.' � =" -
u
•��i, a (Y` �t. +__ _ k y��
`� �� a 0. �� a•.. '�, ..5
A
Morton / p
u p
Fork
€sn.,DigitatGlobe. GeoEye. Earfhstar Geographres. NES%irbus DS. USDA. USGS. AEX4g Y IN
/ ImQp�'X•8tognd. IGN. IGP, swisstopo, and the G!S U Community. Copyngnt.®2013 Nabdnal
ng
t••`,,f .Geographic Society, i-cufied_Esn HER.!`. D-eLorme. myn da Ma
.p J .OpenStreeth4ap contributors and the GIS'�
�
Figure 1. Vicinity of PA # 16-12-0029 on USGS topographic mapping (Stella), showing Bridge No. 0011 on SR 1434
over Starkey's Creek. A black circle shows the project location while green circumscribed triangles are cemeteries.
"No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED "firm for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in Ute 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
3 of4

D
6�1
Project Tracking No.:
16-12-0029
�0 175 350 700 Feet .t�..
Rv
ff
• � � ° mar. � '• � ���. *�
'i .� �•: r�P 4
t,1Sl �- �A' x; �j t• ` „-,. i,G. 4^y .t�
fr
. yw
1* a #e
Ig Jre Vk T
%
Y x
•r' yr' r�i►w'�,. 4 _ f"'J�a�� T•' ��� ��.��" -tj^ f ` � .�
r,�
L, arir `•,�� d� �1 C+F' s.vi55f o,�, i InA GI'S Ln�+� 1.,:^''" .
Figure 2. Aerial map of PA 16-12-0029, Bridge No. 0011 on SR 1434 over Starkey's Creek. Note the swampy area is
clearly visible using the 2-ft contour intervals. The approximate APE is shown in yellow.
"No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED •" form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
4 of4

Project Tracking No. (Internal Use
16-12-0029
r
�►�*`ilR�� HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
' This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
County:
Onslow
WBS No.:
17BP.3.R.56
Document
Type:
Fed Aid No:
Funding:
X State Federal
Federal
Permits :
X Yes No
Permit
Typ e(s):
NWP, WQC, CAMA
Project Description: Replace Bridge No. 11 on SR 1434 (Beligrade-Swansboro Road)
over Starke 's Creek no off -site detourspecified in review request).
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
DESCRIPTIONOFREVIEWACTIVITIES, RESULTS, AND CONCLUSIONS: HPOWeb reviewed on 12 January
2017 and yielded one SL, one SS, and no NR, DE, or LD properties in the Area of Potential Effects (APE).
Onslow County current GIS mapping, aerial photography, and tax information indicated a mostly wooded
APE (viewed 12 January 2017). The APE intersects the two large parcels on which the study -listed David
Sanders Aman House (ON0015) and John Robert White House (ON0569) are located; both resources
stand 1350 feet and more north of the existing bridge, on the far side of intervening woodland outside
the APE and well beyond likely project impact. Similarly, a cemetery is located on the east side of SR
1434 (Beligrade-Swansboro Road) on the White House property, approximately 1225 feet north of the
bridge and also unlikely to be affected by the project. Constructed in 1969, Bridge No. 11 is not eligible
for the National Register as it is not representative of any distinctive engineering or aesthetic type.
Google Maps "Street View" confirmed the absence of critical architectural and landscape resources in the
APE (viewed 12 January 2017).
No architectural survey is required for the project as currently defined.
WHY THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION PROVIDES A RELIABLE BASIS FOR REASONABLY PREDICTING THAT
THERE ARE NO UNIDENTIFIED SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL OR LANDSCAPE RESOURCES IN
THE PROJECTAREA: APE extends 400 feet from either end of the existing bridge (N-S) and 100 feet to
either side of the SR 1434 (Bellgrade-Swansboro Road) centerline (E-W) to encompass proposed
construction activities and possible project impacts. The comprehensive architectural survey of the
county (1987) and related publication, as well as later studies recorded no resources in the APE (I. Daniel
Pezzoni, The Architectural History of Onslow County, North Carolina, Richlands, NC: Onslow County Museum, 1998). County
GIS and other visuals illustrate the absence of significant architectural and landscape resources in the
APE. No National Register -listed properties are located within the APE.
Should any aspect of the project design change,
please notify NCDOT Historic Architecture as additional review may be necessary.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
X Map(s) ❑Previous Survey Info. ❑Photos ❑Correspondence ❑Design Plans
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
Hist is Architecture and Landscapes -- NO SURVEY REQUIRED
r) I t 0
N DOT Architectural Historian . Q
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO S(/lZVIiY RLpUIRIiD farm jar A -tines Transportation Prqiecls as Qualified
APR 1,3 2018
DCM- MILD CITY

Onslow Bridge 11 -Vicinity Map
r
ON SLOW
VG VG1I wI GV, GV IV
NR Points
� NRHD Center Point
• NR Individual Listing NR Boundaries
0 NR Listing, Gone Q National Register Boundary
1'
r ysv.11e
Jr
t=
...........................�
JONES
L
dge 11
0
l : l U3,LtSU
AP y 0 0.75 1.5 3 mi
Boundary of Destroyed/Removed NR ListingPR 3 2018 1ti I. I. 11 11 1
0 1.25 2.5 5 km
b/ ��w D C'�E M HERE, Dena (H rig Kong), Esr!a o INCREMENT P, l),
r1 MET4 Esn Chna o Kong), Esri Korea, Esri Thailand

North Carolina Department of Transportation
ht( )1 I I t\\ tic 'r Highway Stormwater Program '
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
(Version 2.07; Released October 2016) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: 17BP.3.R.56 TIP No.: SF-660011 County(ies): Onslow Page 1 of 1
General Project Information
WBS Element:
17BP.3.R.56 ITIP Number: SF-660011 Project Type: Bridge Replacement Date: 2/12/2018
NC DOT Contact:
Jon Moore, PE
Contractor / Desi ner:
Richard Bollinger, PE
Address:
1020 Birch Ridge Drive
Raleigh, NC 27610
Address:
8521 Six Forks Rd. Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27615
Phone:
919 707-6738
Phone:
919 926-4105
Email:
ilmoore6(cJ)ncdot.gov
Email:
Richard.Bollingegoa rsandh.com
Ci /Town:
N/A
Coun ies :
Onslow
River Basins :
White Oak
CAMA County?
Yes
Wetlands within Project Limits?
Yes
Project Description
Project Length (lin. miles or feet):
530 ft. Surrounding Land Use: Woods / Residential
Proposed Project
Existing Site
Project Built -Upon Area ac.
0.3 ac.
0.3 ac.
Typical Cross Section Description:
Two 11' lanes with 2' full depth paved shoulders, 6' total shoulder width (9' total shoulder
width with guardrail)
Two 10' lanes with 4' to 6' shoulders
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day):
Design/Future: N/A Year: N/A
Existing- 3300 Year: 2013
General Project Narrative:
(Description of Minimization of Water
Quality Impacts)
This is a bridge replacement project. Existing bridge 011 is 2 span @ 35'. Proposed bridge 011 is 1 @ 25'; 1 @ 55' Cored Slab. The Proposed bridge location and length will
provide a setback from the banks and remove a bent from the stream. The proposed bridge will not have any deck drains. The pipe outlet has a rip rap pad to dissipate energy
before entering the wetlands. The pipe outlet cannot be pulled back from the wetlands due to the depth of the pipe vs the height of the fill slope / existing ground.
NCDOT will attempt to avoid and minimize impacts to streams to the greatest extent practicable during project design.
J
d
Waterbody Information
Surface Water Body (1): Starke s Creek
NCDWR Stream Index No.:
20-10
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body
Primary Classification:
Class C
Supplemental Classification:
None
Other Stream Classification:
None
Impairments:
None
Aquatic T&E Species?
No Comments:
NRTR Stream ID:
N/A (no NRTR for this project)
Buffer Rules in Effect: N/A
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body?
iYes
Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? INo
Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? I N/A
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body?
lNo
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)
(If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative, if no, justify in the
General Project Narrative)
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)

yys�„�A7yq�
W FV'r19
�Ow+�
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Roy COOPER
GOvERNOR
March 19, 2018
Willis J. Aman, Jr.
2384 Belgrade Swansboro Rd.
Maysville, NC 28555
Dear Mr. Aman:
JAMES H. TROGDON, III
SECRETARY
As required by the NC Division of Coastal Management Regulations, you are being notified as an
adjacent riparian property owner that the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
plans to replace Onslow Bridge Number 660011 on SR 1434 Belgrade Swansboro Rd in Onslow
County. This bridge spans Starkeys Creek and is located 0.77 mile north of SR 1428 Riggs Rd.
The attached plan sheets and application depict the proposed bridge replacement. Please indicate
your position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return the completed form and any
comments to: Mr. Stephen Lane, Division of Coastal Management, 400 Commerce Ave.,
Morehead City, NC 28557 or call [phone].
Should you have objections to the project, your comments must be received within 10 days of
receipt of this notice. No response within 10 days will be considered the same as no objection if
you have been notified by certified mail.
Siincce�r"ely,
/Ib
�
- Mason Herndon
Environmental Program Supervisor, NCDOT — Division 3
I have no objection to the proposed project as described in this correspondence.
I have an objection to the project as presently proposed and have enclosed comments.
Signature
Print Name
Phone Number with Area Code
Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
5501 BARBADOS BOULEVARD
CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429-5647
Telephone: [phone]
Fax. [phone]
Customer Semite: 1-877-3684968
Website: www.ncdot.gov
Date
RECEIVED
APR 13 2018
Location:
5501 BARBADOS BOULEVARD
CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429-5647

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Roy COOPER
GOVERNOR
March 19, 2018
Bobby O. Banks
P.O. Box 285
Pollocksville, NC 28573
Dear Mr. Banks:
JAMES H. TROGDON, III
SECRETARY
As required by the NC Division of Coastal Management Regulations, you are being notified as an
adjacent riparian property owner that the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
plans to replace Onslow Bridge Number 660011 on SR 1434 Belgrade Swansboro Rd in Onslow
County. This bridge spans Starkeys Creek and is located 0.77 mile north of SR 1428 Riggs Rd.
The attached plan sheets and application depict the proposed bridge replacement. Please indicate
your position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return the completed form and any
comments to: Mr. Stephen Lane, Division of Coastal Management, 400 Commerce Ave.,
Morehead City, NC 28557 or call [phone].
Should you have objections to the project, your comments must be received within 10 days of
receipt of this notice. No response within 10 days will be considered the same as no objection if
you have been notified by certified mail.
Sincerely,
wx,�
Mason Herndon
Environmental Program Supervisor, NCDOT — Division 3
I have no objection to the proposed project as described in this correspondence.
I have an objection to the project as presently proposed and have enclosed conuuents.
Signature
Print Name
Phone Number with Area Code
Mailing Address: Telephone: [phone]
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Fax: [phone]
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968
5501 BARBADOS BOULEVARD
CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429-5647 Website: www.ncdot.gov
Date
RECEIVED
APR 1, 3 2018
SSD I�ARB ADOS WC TY
1.
CASTLE IIAYNE, NC 29429-5647

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER
GOVERNOR
March 19, 2018
Michael E. Kennedy
2119 Belgrade Swansboro Rd
Maysville, NC 28555
Dear Mr. Kennedy:
JAMEs H. TRomom III
SECRETARY
As required by the NC Division of Coastal Management Regulations, you are being notified as an
adjacent riparian property owner that the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
plans to replace Onslow Bridge Number 660011 on SR 1434 Belgrade Swansboro Rd in Onslow
County. This bridge spans Starkeys Creek and is located 0.77 mile north of SR 1428 Riggs Rd.
The attached plan sheets and application depict the proposed bridge replacement. Please indicate
your position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return the completed form and any
comments to: Mr. Stephen Lane, Division of Coastal Management, 400 Commerce Ave.,
Morehead City, NC 28557 or call [phone].
Should you have objections to the project, your comments must be received within 10 days of
receipt of this notice. No response within 10 days will be considered the same as no objection if
you have been notified by certified mail.
Sincerely,
v Mason Herndon
V Environmental Program Supervisor, NCDOT — Division 3
I have no objection to the proposed project as described in this correspondence.
I have an objection to the project as presently proposed and have enclosed comments.
Signature
Print Name
Phone Number with Area Code
Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
5501 BARBADOS BOULEVARD
CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429-5647
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-368A968
iYebsite: www.ncdot.gov
Date
APR 13 2018
DCM- MH® CITY
Location:
5501 BARBADOS BOULEVARD
CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429-5647

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Roy COOPER
GovERNOR
March 19, 2018
Gerald T. Williams
Hilda J. Ritchie
3125 Ridge Hollow Dr.
Plano, TX 75023
Dear Mr. Williams and Ms. Ritchie:
JAMES H. TROGDON, III
SECRETARY
As required by the NC Division of Coastal Management Regulations, you are being notified as an
adjacent riparian property owner that the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
plans to replace Onslow Bridge Number 660011 on SR 1434 Belgrade Swansboro Rd in Onslow
County. This bridge spans Starkeys Creek and is located 0.77 mile north of SR 1428 Riggs Rd.
The attached plan sheets and application depict the proposed bridge replacement. Please indicate
your position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return the completed form and any
comments to: Mr. Stephen Lane, Division of Coastal Management, 400 Commerce Ave.,
Morehead City, NC 28557 or call [phone].
Should you have objections to the project, your comments must be received within 10 days of
receipt of this notice. No response within 10 days will be considered the same as no objection if
you have been notified by certified mail.
Sincerely,
wti
Mason Herndon
Environmental Program Supervisor, NCDOT — Division 3
I have no objection to the proposed project as described in this correspondence.
I have an objection to the project as presently proposed and have enclosed comments.
Signature
Print Name
Phone Number with Area Code
Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
5501 BARBADOS BOULEVARD
CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429-5647
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968
Website: www.ncdot.gov
DatepECEIVED
APR 1.3 2018
[)CM- MHD CITY
Location:
5501 BARBADOS BOULEVARD
CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429-5647