Smith, Thomas

7 4 y,.. 4 ) i, F:.i F +. f� i 4 .'k r. { ;•( a:
` `CAMA / ❑ DREDGE & FILL
EN'ERAL PER +,k,, Previous permit #
New ❑Modification ❑Cor»plete Reissue - ❑Partial eissue Date previous permit issued.
As auth rized by the State of North Carolina, Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1
and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant to I SA NCAC s . ,•'
, Rules attache.
Applicant Name�'� 1 `9 Project Location: County , ��- ► --
Address -' ( s. ,
City State LZIP_^
Phone # (� ° TVE-Mail
Authorized Agent j',1�
'
❑ cw *A
❑ ES ❑ PTS
Affected
AEC(s): ❑ OEA ❑ HHF ❑ IH
❑ UBA ❑ N/A
❑ PW
ORW: yes / PNA yes /
Street Address/ State Road/ Lot #(s)
Subdivision i
City ; .t ZIP
Phone # ( 0);-1 v/7Riven Basin vJ
Adj. Wtr. Body
Closest Maj. Wtr. Body
o
1
IIIIINNOWWMENON
■■124-
��!■■■■■
■",VAN
�i■l;::�C1►!a!i■■►�iiri/►r111�1r
ma:■:::::::::
■■■��■�■!�■■■■■■■■■r�l�■�■�■■�■■■■■■■■■■ems■
■�■�■■MEN
.. _ ■■■■■■■■!�■■■■■■tt�''■■Ili■■■\:�'.!I���''►1■■■■■■■■■■■■
■��®SIC■�■®11�■■®��I■:��
■■■■■■■�i�■■■��lr7���lS..��
.. UNITSKIM
,� ,• � 1 , Ali.
■■■.■■'
rl,LIMUN■■■■■■■■■■■
=�����r:��
�W,
�
INN
�■■■111II1ii■�!I■■■■■■■i�1�r�■rll�■
� ,�' .�/ . ! �
j_ Ili► �. .� f f<' ..,". ��'. i�'
Agent or p
p,Kc�nt ringed ame` ✓
i
Permit Officer s ed ame
x. It
$' naturePlease read comp lianc�e'statement on bac of perm,
Signaturern
Application Fee(s)
Check`
Issuing Date
Expiratio Date
� '-%� .. ,•+„ ins o � T�.•
.� , i � �
.,'i + � "�, ,
/�+�'

Statement of Compliance and Consistency
This permit is subject to compliance with this application, site drawing and attached general and specific conditions. Any
violation of these terms may subject the permittee to a fine or criminal or civil action; and may cause the permit to become
null and void.
This permit must be on the project site and accessible to the permit officer when the project is inspected for compliance. The
applicant certifies by signing this permit that 1) prior to undertaking any activities authorized by this permit, the applicant will
confer with appropriate local authorities to confirm that this project is consistent with the local land use plan and all local
ordinances, and 2) a written statement or certified mail return receipt has been obtained from the adjacent riparian
landowner(s) .
The State of North Carolina and the Division of Coastal Management, in issuing this permit under the best available
information and belief, certifythat this project is consistentwith the North Carolina Coastal Management Program.
River Basin Rules Applicable To Your Project:
Tar- Pamlico River Basin Buffer Rules ❑ Other:
Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules
If indicated on front of permit, your project is subject to the Environmental Management Commission's Buffer Rules for the
River Basin checked above due to its location within that River Basin. These buffer rules are enforced by the NC Division of
Water Resources. Contact the Division of Water Resources at the Washington Regional Office (252-946-6481) or the
Wilmington Regional Office (910-796-7215) for more information on how to comply with these buffer rules.
Division of Coastal Management Offices
Morehead City Headquarters Washington District
400 Commerce Ave 943 Washington Square Mall
Morehead City, NC 28557 Washington, NC 27889
252-808-2808/ I-888-4RCOAST 252-946-6481
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Carteret, Craven, Onslow -
North of New River Inlet- and Pamlico
Counties)
Elizabeth City District
1367 U.S. 17 South
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
252-264-3901
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Camden, Chowan, Currituck,
Dare, Gates, Pasquotank and Perquimans
Counties)
(Serves: Beaufort, Bertie, Hertford, Hyde,
Tyrrell and Washington Counties)
Wilmington District
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
910-796-7215
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Brunswick, New Hanover,
Onslow - South of New River Inlet -
and Pender Counties)
http://www. nccoastal management. net/
Revised 08/27/ 14

CAMA / ❑ DREDGE & FILL
y
a1
ENERAL PERMIT
A
B C D
Previous permit #
„ ew ElModification El Complete Reissue El Partial Reissue Date previous permit issued
S auth rized by the State of North Carolina, Department of Environment and Natural Resources
id the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant to 15A NCAC j
501cant Name " `
ED plules
Project Location: County
attached.
'
idress
�'� `
Street Address/ State Road/ Lot #(s)
~/
State ZIP
lone # ( J"'�r / r"�' " "
Subdivisi
~s
E-Mail
p
klt orized Agent l'� y
City
'/ f
i
ZIPS
A
fected ElCW TA ❑ Es ❑ PTS
❑ OEA rHHF
Phone # ( River
"`
sin
Basin
❑ IH ❑ UBA ❑ N/A
C(s):
Adj. Wtr. Body. 1
nat ma unkn
El Pw
RW: ' yes / PNA yes /
Closest Maj. Win Body
i Pe of ,project/ Activity 771'n
(Scale:
" �iRfh
# LC:'.'
-4ixbd Platform(s)�
Y _
roin length�
. number
... _
maayg x distance . -
in channel�I%Ifni■�■�■�■►�Il�i
,�
:k�c-�t�►Z..
IY
a
�I■■ti!!4!':'L�.�,.
yr.
1f1■['iii.�:�"'
�l�Lit'"a/�!■■■
■
■■■
�14■■■®■
"
■■Ilk
Cargo
1e,t�TA
li�llllr
■
■�■■■�'IN
IIIMMMUMMIMENEMN
'
i
��
.�
.
�Ca
;IN
INS
■■■ONE■RIAma
INN
■
■t
l
.
•■�
Islam
■.■■■'MM[I/■■■■■,I
E
RE1
ON
MR
0
ai
.
1
1
i
1�
�,IM
[i■
■■��
r■
■
■
tit
ftl
■
■■■■■■
■■
■■
ON
1
IN
MEN
■■■H■■■1■■■■■■.
■ti
■■■■■�l1■■■■■■■■■■■■■i
c Bulldozing
"Ilk
'
z
•..•
'mil,_ , • • - •- • '. -•
ra■■■■■■■rSI■■■■■■
Will
�..
awe
'N
ME
■■■■■■■■t�■■■■■■'lr■■U'1■■■■■
re,
I
M■■■■1■N■■■■1■i■■inilm
MEMO
■■
■■■■■■■■■pow,
i!J■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■
■■■■
■■■■
MINE■■■
■OMME
■■■■■■■■■■■G��i�[iI[ii�t��d
■■�1'�tl�3■■■fR■■■.■OM
NMI'
1■■■■t*M
I■■■..M
T3�R1R"1�il����9i�l;�"�it�
ION
IN
'W"RI■.■■
UR
MIN
■�'�101
IMMEM►�r
IN■■1■�®
v■■■■■■■
■■■■INN
■■■R■■■■■■■1�■■■■■■MEWIME
•
II
����
1
.I
M
__
. .
_
4ver
Basin
rules.
a Local Planning Jurisdi
V Special Conditions
mm
read compliance statement onbac of permip*'*
p,(s) Checks#
fi

Coastal Management
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
May 02, 2016
Ms. Elizabeth M. Johnson
237 Pearson Circle
Newport, NC 28570
Dear Ms. Johnson:
PAT MCCRORY
Governor
VAN DER VAART
Secretary
.3RAXTON DAVIS
Director
This letter is in response to your correspondence dated 04/11/2016 to the Division of Coastal
Management regarding your objections to the proposed dock extension project by Mr. Thomas Smith. The
proposed project is located on Broad Creek at 219 Pearson Circle, Newport, in Carteret County, North
Carolina.
The Division has reviewed your concerns and objections to the proposed project. After reviewing
the proposal along with your objections, the Division has determined that the proposed development
complies with the rules of the Coastal Resources Commission in 15A NCAC 07H .1200. Therefore, the
Division issued CAMA General Permit #66866-C to Mr. Thomas Smith on 05/02/2016 for the construction of
extending the existing dock to a total of 133' from the NHW at the bulkhead, installing two (2) boatlifts, a 4' x
24' finger pier, and a partially covered 10' x 30' platform at the terminus of the pier that extends (L-shape)
towards the north. All portions of the proposed development must be 15' or greater from the southern and
northern riparian access lines. A copy of the permit is enclosed for your review.
If you wish to contest the Division's decision to issue this permit, you may file a request for a Third
Party Hearing. The request for a hearing will be considered by the Chairman of the Coastal Resources
Commission. The hearing request must be filed with the Director, Division of Coastal Management, in
writing and must be received within twenty (20) days after the disputed permit decision is made. Please
contact Coastal Management Field Representative Heather Styron or me at [phone], if you have
any questions, or if we can. provide any additional information.
Enclosure
Sincerely,
Roy Brownlow
District Manager RECEIVED
MAY 0 4 2016
Cc: Heather Styron, Field Representative, DCM DC M ® I H D CITY
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave I Morehead City, NC 28557
252 808 2808 T

a
Name of Property Owner Applying for Permit: / l )D M" ' Y;n
Mailing address: 2-1 eGtrScN1 t✓C
v
Telephone Number: Z J6 Z-% Z 3 -) 7 7 7
6MM ©'I�fWY�
l certify that f have authorized '?�o_g��e Banns a-j 'y n'�0ql r (agent/contractor),
to act on my behalf, for the purpose of applying and obtaining all CAMA permits
necessary for the proposed development of ZJock -9,v , r'i�rvt . r,�iow.k J-YIS4"7
I1 T
I i�ll� G�Ld I
at my property located at ��"Ws w cf, , c4f ti/ AL
This certification is valid through
(Property Owner Information)
Signature
Print or Type Name
Title, co. owner or trustee for property
q- ts- )
Date
251 _?2-3- )7-7-7
Telephone Number
Email Address
(date).
RECEIVED
MAY 0 4 2016
DCM- MHD CITY
RECEIVED
APR 19 2016
DCM- MHD CITY

21 kER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION
■ Complet1
A si nature
■ Print ame address n the reverse
f-_
Ll=ddrewee
so e n return the card you.
• A 8gh IS Card to th k of mailpiece,
I3. R by (Printed N )
C. Date of Delivery
ont a front if spa ts.(e
Y�C
-
1. le -dressed fp:
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
Jo v o
If YES, enter delivery address below:
01 (rc
N rP a$s-0
3. 13 Priority Mail
III'I,III(IIII'lII)lIIIIIIIIIlI
II'llll11lll')l
❑ Adult Signature ❑ Registered Mail-
reRestrictedDelivery �Restricted
❑AdultS9 atuce
❑RegisteredM
9590 9402 1529 5362 7324 41
❑ Certfied Mail® Delivery
❑ Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑ R= Receiptfor
❑ Collect on Delivery Merchandise
2. Article Numb- - -
5 4 8 7 8483
❑ Collect on Delivery Resbiaed Delivery ❑ Signature ConflrmatlonTM
Confirmation
Insured Mail - ❑ Signatureon
7 015 1520 0 0 0 2
Insured Mail Restricted Delivery n��
_
(over $500)
Ps Form 3811, July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053
Domestic Return Receipt

USPS TRACKING #
First -Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
USPS
Permit No. G-10
9590 9402 1529 5362 7324 41
United States
Postal Service
ier: Please print your name, address, and ZIP4"4® in this box*
it, %u✓rte,'S dal �W Sit
MbYV.c-I-,IJ 6C 1l AX- 1:3l"FS5 .�.i
Il"111ijilIlliIIIII#)III,ill/011l` Iffi 11111111ill1il)]a/II

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. A. Signature
■ Print your name and address on the reverse X CI Agent
so that we can return the card to you. Addre
■ Attach this: card to the back of the mailpiece, B Received by (Printe;kf4a,),� opt i
or on the front;it space pet'mits.�
t. Article Addressedto; D: Is delivery address different from Item 1? Yes
IfYES, enter delivery address below. ❑ No
1v v
ot95
3as33
II I �III�I III I'I I III I I I IIII� III II II I I II I II I III
9590 9402 1529 5362 7324 34
2. Article 10 - •- - - i_w..n
yo20 0002 5487 8490
3. Service Type
❑ Adult Signature
❑ Adult Signature Restricted Delivery
CI Certified Mail@
❑ Certified Mail Restricted Delivery
❑ Collect on Delivery
P Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery
❑ Insured Mall
❑ Insured Mail Restricted Delivery
im—k5nm
❑ Priority Mail Express*
❑ Registered Mall-
[3 Reeggistered Mail Restricted
Delivery
• Return Receipt for
Merchandise
❑ Signature Confirmation*"
❑ Signature Confirmation
Restricted Delivery
PS Form 381-1. JU 201&i1SAF7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Recei t

JillUSPS TRACIIING #
FirstClass Mail
Postage & Fees. Paid
USPS
Permit No. G-10
9590 9402 1529 5362 7324 34
United States
Postal Servile
• Sender: Please print your name, addressrand ZIP+411 in this box•
ACL
0 • '5-k-
I

0311*4zid =13 Tge-171 T �3 i-Nt#,11#1,1 y
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to ' r 10m4s 51. l 's
(Name of Property Owner)
property located at 2 I �i 1�-eci rsor C(rL l-p—
�i'ixccl �it'`�-��-- (Address, Lot, Block, Ro d, etc.)
on , in �F.<•t� , N.C.
(Waterbody) City/Town and/or County)
The applicant has described to me, as shown below, the development proposed at the above
location.
0 I have no objection to this proposal.
I have objections to this proposal.
DESCRIPTION AND/OR DRAWING OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
(Individual proposing development must rill in description below or attach a site drawing)
5�e
RECEIVED
MAY 0 4 Z016
DC - ZAP' C'TY
WAIVER SECTION
I understand that a pier, dock, mooring pilings, breakwater, boathouse, lift, or groin must be set
back a minimum distance of 15' from my area of riparian access unless waived by me. (if you
wish to waive the setback, you must initial the appropriate blank below.)
I do wish to waive the 15' setback requirement.
I do not wish to waive the 15' setback requirement.
(Property Owner Information) (,Adjacent Property Amer Information)
Sit ature
�t7MCLS Sm
Zi � T�e Name
tarsdn
Ct�Ge.
Mailing Address
Ne.W.00,r4 IV C
af5 % C7
City/stat /Zip
asd - ia3-1
-1-11
Telephgne Numbe,
Date
Print or
::�-r • c rlwr
'vrVE 1712-
_1
Ci��aUr/�rpyi - f'c3-3.5
TelephonejjNumber
V-//-poi/.
Date
(Revised 611812012)

2l�
m
RECEIVED
MAY 0 4 2016
DCM- NAHD CITY
II Se b6icK�
Or
L, i('{2
dovvt�

} ' PEARSON CIRCLE
F
pF
_
pFFppA
p0
?8
15.0'
VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE
Lo
I�
w)
.-
Li
-ilz
I
V)
_I
UI
BROAD CREEK
Q�
J
Z
�I
O
BOAT o
I Q
LIFT
I
Z�OCK
NORMAL HIGH WATER LINE
NORMAL HIGH WATER LINE
LEGEND
IRF IRON ROD FOUND CID
WOOD
P
IPF IRON PIPE FOUND
N/F NOW OR FORMERLY
ULKHEAD
DB DEED BOOK
COASTAL WETLANDS
MB MAP BOOK
PG PAGE
w
R/W RIGHT OF WAY
MBL MINIMUM BUILDING
o
0)
LINE
M
CP COMPUTED POINT
I00
0
L
z
O o
�00 0
(V O
U-)
RECEIVED
V)
MAY 0 4 2016
TIE TO NAIL FOUND
CENTERLINE INTERSECTION
PIERSON CIRCLE & HWY 24 _
A r, S31'32'43"E I,PF
`-'`I 1576.99'
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
( IN FEET )
I inch = 30 ft.
DCM- MHD CITY
S30°30'00"E IR! ,
60.22'PEARSON CIRCLE
60' R/W (PUBLIC)
120
OWNER: SMITH,THOMAS CORMACK
REFERENCE: DEED BOOK:1485
DEED PAGE:128
TAX#:631502796041000
ADDRESS: 219 PEARSON CIRCLE
RIPARIAN SURVEY FOR

r._­, ., ,. .,.vta r.i v
W—ti-_ w
&y,1���
glow ao ti)ow7.P-f
RECEIVED
MAY 0 4 2016
DCM- N4HD CITY

4/21/2016
ConnectGIS Feature Report
Carteret
CONNECTGIS Printed April 21, 2016
WEB HOSTING See Below for Disclaimer
Parcels - Updated 4-2G-2016
Cer'erlires
M
NC Railroad Right of Wa,..,
13
Court,. Bourdary
Ot e r C o L, r':y
Cart
PIN
Acreage
Parcel Dimensions
Lot Number
AWE �-3
5M
k
I. 7r'�N�
4",
-;Aa
Total Length: 266.67 Feet AM 0 4 2016
e. Sq. Feet
or Acres
F or Sq. Mile� LJCM- FOND CITY
M57- T:
S #fli.: 200 Feet Z
he information displayed by this website is prepared for the inventory of real property found within this jurisdiction and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, and
ther public records and data. Users of this information are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary information sources should be consulted for
erification of the information contained on this site. Carteret County assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained on this site. Carteret County does not
uarantee that the data and map services will be available to users without interruption or error. Furthermore, Carteret County may modify or remove map services an
ccess methods at will. 1
http://carteret2.connectgis.comIDawrioadFile.ashx?i=_ags_Mapf832d4O7ld5c4l2ab28e5Ocf8fdd99b6x.htm&t--pririt 1/1

Elizabeth M. Johnson
237 Pearson Circle
Newport, NC 28570
April 11, 2016
252-393-8467
Ms. Heather Styron
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
Dear Ms. Styron:
APR 1 1 2016
®CM- MHD CITY
This letter is in reference to the request of Mr. Thomas Smith of 219 Pearson Circle in
Newport on Broad Creek to extend his existing dock to 165', install a new bulkhead,
relocate his existing finger pier and boat lift, and construct a 12' x 30' platform with roof
with one new boat lift.
As this proposal violates at least seven (7) regulations as set forth by the NC
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, I oppose this request as stated
below:
1. (Regulation 15A NCAC 07H 1205 b.) "Piers and docking facilities shall not
extend beyond the established pier length along the same shoreline for similar
use. This restriction shall not apply to piers and docking facilities 100 feet or less
in length unless necessary to avoid interference with navigation or other uses of
the waters by the public such as blocking established navigation routes or
interfering with access to adjoining properties as determined by the Division of
Coastal Management."
This request would far exceed any other pier on the west bank of Broad
Creek and the rules are very specific. Most of the docks on the west bank
on Broad Creek are 50' or less in length --- not 165' in length as Mr. Smith
proposes.
2. (Regulation 15A NCAC 07H.1204 a.) "Piers and docking facilities authorized by
the general permit set forth in this Section shall be for the exclusive use of the
land owner, or occupant and shall not be leased, rented, or used for any
commercial purpose. Piers and docking facilities shall provide docking space for
no more than two boats."
(Regulation 15A NCAC 07H 1205 r.) "Piers and docking facilities shall provide
docking space for no more than two boats." RECENED
MAY 0 4 2016
®CM- MFID CITY

J� N tree �
Mr. Smith is allowed two recreational boats on his premises, however, often
there are multiple large barges and commercial boats docked on his
property in direct violation of regulations. Mr. Smith's son owns a
construction company (Bogue Banks Marine Construction which is located
U
in Morehead City) and often stations his boats on this said property.
3. (Regulation 15A NCAC 07H.1204 c. and d.) "There shall be no interference
with navigation or use of the waters by the public by the existence of piers aim
docking facilities." X
IV
"The permit set forth in this Section shall not be applicable to proposed 0
<
construction where the Department determines that the proposed activity witH
endanger adjoining properties or significantly affect historic, cultural, scenic;
conservation or recreation values).
Broad Creek is a very small body of water and a pier of this length would
interfere with navigational and recreational use. Individuals on jet skis or
water ski's as well as all recreational boats would be put into harms way.
Boats pulling small children on tubes or boards come very close to our
dock and the proposal of a 165' dock is 85' longer or more than all of the
other docks along the west side of Broad Creek. If someone swung wide
and hit the proposed heavy metal lifts and dock a fatal outcome could very
well occur. The length of the proposed dock is unnecessarily long; the
depth of the water in Broad Creek is the same except along the shoreline.
A 165' pier will interfere with public recreational use of these waters and
pose an extreme safety hazard to the general public.
4. (Regulation 15A NCAC 07H 1205 p.) "Piers and docking facilities shall in no
case extend more than 1/4 the width of a natural water body . . ."
In addition to the proposed pier not in keeping with the existing piers in the
creek it might very well exceed the 1 /4 width of the natural water
requirement, at least as far as the visible eye can discern.
5. (Regulation 15A NCAC 07H 1205 q.) "Piers and docking facilities shall not
interfere with the access to any riparian property, and shall have a minimum
setback of 15 feet between any part of the pier and docking facility and the
adjacent property lines extended into the water at the points that they intersect
the shoreline."
I hereby request that the Division of Coastal Management ensureIREGEWED
MAY 0 4 2016
DC M- POND C ff

RECEIVED
APR 112016
is no infringement in any way with my riparian property rights. ®C-
MHD CITY
6. If the intent of the homeowner is to build this pier in order to rent space
to large rigs, this applicant should be made aware that it is against Carteret
County zoning regulations to have commercial use in a residential area.
As stated in #2, there are often commercial barges and boats on Mr.
Smith's property.
7. On the first application, Mr. Smith's proposal indicated a 60' wide lot. On
this, the second proposal, the lot is listed as 60' 22". County surveys on
Deeds are not fluid. If there are any inaccuracies, it would be in a few
inches, not almost two feet. In the Deed Book on 219 Pearson Circle,
#1485, page 128, the lot is listed at 60'.
8. Several years ago, Mr. Smith approached my husband to request the
purchase of one foot of our property. We declined this offer as we did not
want to cut off our 60' lot. If Mr. Smith acquired 22" from the lot on the
other side of his property, this transaction is not recorded in the Deed Book.
Therefore, as Mr. Smith was denied an additional foot of property years ago
and this new proposal indicates an added 22" that is not legally recorded in
the Deed Book, I respectfully submit my concerns and questions on this
particular matter.
Thank you for your consideration of my opposition to this proposed pier and
lifts. All of us on Pearson Circle live in close proximity to one another and
all of us want to safely enjoy Broad Creek and live within the guidelines of
Carteret County.
Respectfully submitted,
Elizabeth M. Johnson
R *CXe V,0,e.4 . ('kc)�o C 1
RECEWED
MAY 0 4 2016
DCM- NpiI D CITY

30
3 PEARSON CIRCLE
I
I�
VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE
a
d�tfAm
W
LLJ
o) Uj e..- �.JA7,2
cn
�(
I✓
BROAD CREEK
QI
I
rd
BOA T 0
LIFT
I
I7N,,-aOCK
NORMAL HIGH WATER LINE
LEGEND
I
IRF IRON ROD FOUND CP
WOOD
IPF IRON PIPE FOUND
N/F NOW OR FORMERLY
ULKHEAD
DB DEED BOOK
MB MAP BOOK
PG PAGE
R/W RIGHT OF WAY
MBL MINIMUM BUILDING
LINE
CP COMPUTED POINT
0o
IN o
0�
U)
FZOUNO NAIL
D
TETRUNE INTERSEC110N
PIERSON CIRCLE do HWY 24 _
n N S31'3 ''42 3"E IPF
1576.99'
GRAPHIC SCALE
15 30 60
OFF
04 DA 0,
28
�-- 15.0'
I RECEIVED
L+J
(-j APR 11 2016
I� ®CIS- MHD CITY
IQ
Z
Q
a
Icy
NTAL HIGH WATER LINE
TAL WETLANDS
w �f'p�OSC� v
io
0
IN M b
Z
s awl
eel y�
pf-op ed.
l�
EI
� MAY 0 4 46
S30'30'00"E IRF,�
60.22'PEARSON CIRC�LE3
60' R/W (PUBLIC)
120
( IN FEET ) OWNER: SMITH,THOMAS CORMACK
1 inch = 30 ft REFERENCE: DEED BOOK:1485
DEED PAGE:128
TAX#:631502796041000 RIPARIAN SURVEY FOR
ADDRESS: 219 PEARSON CIRCLE I BRIAN FOWLER

Sm/Y"�
19 ,,-,5c)� �trc,/�
)U'I.X
t
�f
RECEIVE®
APR 112016
CCM- MCI® CITY
MAY 0 4 201
DCM- NIHD
t t
7-1
P,,eose ,
5 devj
sty b�
Pier
hfad.�
I
l ev5
P, 'y
Fr tc
' G V/ 'Nev,,\j , y%

Elizabeth M. Johnson
237 Pearson Circle
Newport, NC 28570
September 25, 2015
252-393-8467
Ms. Heather Styron
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
Dear Ms. Styron:
This letter is in reference to the request of Mr. Thomas Smith of 219 Pearson Circle in
Newport on Broad Creek to extend his existing dock to 160', install a new bulkhead,
relocate his existing pier and boat lift, and construct a 12' x 16' platform with roof with
one new boat lift.
I oppose this request for the following reasons:
1. "Piers and docking facilities shall not extend beyond the established pier length
along the same shoreline for similar use." This request would far exceed any other pier
on the west bank of Broad Creek.
2. Broad Creek is a very small body of water and a pier of this length would interfere
with navigation and recreational use. Individuals on jet skis or water ski's as well as all
recreational boats would be put into harms way. Boats pulling small children on tubes
or boards come very close to our dock and the proposal of a 160' dock is 85' longer or
more than all of the other docks along the west side of Broad Creek. If someone swung
wide and hit the proposed heavy metal lifts and dock a fatal outcome could very well Sr
occur. The length of the proposed dock is unnecessarily long; the depth of the water inc 21� 201g
Broad Creek is the same except along the shoreline.
3. "Piers and docking facilities shall in no case extend more than 1 /4 the width of a
natural water body ..." In addition to the proposed pier not in keeping with the existing
piers in the creek it might very well exceed the 1 /4 width of the natural water
requirement, at least as far as the visible eye can discern.
4. "Piers and docking facilities shall not interfere with the access to any riparian
property, and shall have a minimum setback of 15 feet between any part of the pier and
docking facility and the adjacent property lines extended into the water at the points that
they intersect the shoreline." I hereby request that the Division of Coastal Management
ensure that there is no infringement in any way with my riparian property rights.
a t,.^^
MAY 0 4 2016
®C M- �,V "j...Ij

' 5: If the intent of the homeowner is to build this pier in order to rent space to large rigs,
this applicant should be made aware that it is against Carteret County zoning
regulations to have commercial use in a residential area.
Mr. Smith and I have been good neighbors for over 20 years. My opposition is in no
way personal. It is strictly a legal and safety issue. I thank you for your consideration of
my opposition to this proposed pier and lifts. All of us on Pearson Circle live in close
proximity to one another and all of us want to safely enjoy Broad Creek and live within
the guidelines of Carteret County.
Respectfully submitted,
Elizabeth M. Johnson
Cif ` m D
MAYO42016
®CN1- ��"HD CITY