050614B_Garner, Christopher B._20050630

06/30/2005 13:36 2526365190
r ,
Office,of Planning
and
Community Development
County of Craven
Donald R. Baumgardner, Dtre.:tor
Stephanie S. Currier, Asslstant Mvdor
Shelton P. Toler, Chief Building Codes Inspector
June 30, 2005
Christopher B. Garner
11395 Old US Hwy 52
Winston Salem, NC 27107
RE: DENIAL OF CAMA MINOR DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
APPLICATION NO.050614B
Dear -Mr. Garner:
PAGE 02
Human Swvlcm
2828 Neuse So
New Bern, North Carolina
Planning sL CD (252)
Fax (252)
uqmz6ons(252)
Fax (252)
After reviewing your application in conjunction with the development standards
required by the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) and the DWQ Neuse River
Riparian Buffer rules, it is my determination that no permit may be granted for the project
you have proposed.
This decision is based on the fact that the proposed development is in direct
violation of the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Regulations. Also, the Division of Water
Quality has not waived these buffer regulations, nor have they granted a variance from
these rules. Your project calls for the majority of the proposed structure to fall within
Division of Water Quality's fifty -foot riparian buffer off of the Trent River. Should at
any time the Division of Water Quality waive or vary their regulations, your application
may be reconsidered for approval.
Should you wish to appeal my decision to the Coastal Resources Commission or
request a Variance from that group, please contact me so I can provide you with the
proper forrtts and any other information you may require. Appeal n must e
received by the Division of Coastal Management in Raleigh ' n twenty (20) days of
your receipt of this letter in order to be considered.
z
lo s
Local Permit Officer
Enclosure l / I4 n r(�-�fY
cc: Mark Hardeman, Division of Coastal Manage ent mot'
V

06/30/2005 13:36 2526365190
PAGE 01
2a28 House Blvd
New Gem, NO 28562
Phone: 252-636MI S
Fax:[phone]
Fax
To: Mark Harrleman Fnonu Bryan Jones, Planner I
Fam 252-247-3330 Date: June 30, 2005
Phone Pegesi 2 (including coveO
Re; CAMA Denial (M Shoreline Do CCz
0 Urgent M Few Ravle!w 0 Please CanwnwA ❑ Pl&ww Reply 0 Please Recycle
•Caf11i11Bflts7
Mark.
Here is the corrected denial letterlbr 246 Shoreline Dr. if you need anything else, let me know.
Thanks,
Bryan

07/06/2005 10:30 2526365190
PAGE 02
SHORELINE DRIVE
R-60.00'
L=46.71'
CH-45.54'
CH BRG=N
New SlrF
50' NEUSE RIVER —
BUFFER SETBACK
30' CAMA AEC SETBACK
PROPOSED BUILDING
N 59'53'00" E
20.02,
50' NEUSE RIVER UPLAND /
BUFFER SETBACK N s• 's i /
o�, 9• n
�0+ UPLAND ��O o0PRELIMINARY PLAT
11 NOT •�00" W ry°j 4
5 80'21
FOR RECORDATION
CONVEYANCES G GRAPHIC SCALE z o
OR SALES TRENT RIVER
PROPOSED PLOT PLAN DAME:
246 SHORELINE DRIVE . &-�3�zoo5 ROBERT M. CHILES, R.E. '
RIVER SEND
CRAVEN �T CAROLINA JOB NO.: 2005t30 ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS
FOR CHR STOPHERR6 GARNER. SCALE: 1" - 100' NEW BERN, NORTH CAROUNA :

07/06/2005 10:30 2526365190
PAGE 03
SHORELINE DRIVE
R=60.00'
L-46.71'
CH-45.54'
CH BRG-N69'2d
PROPOSED BUILDING
50' NEUSE RIVER ---
BUFFER SETBACK
30' CAMA AEC SETBACK
Q
0
OCR
0' KUSE RIVER
OFFER SETBACK
III
CIS
PROPOSED PLOT PLAN
246 SHORELINE DRIVE
RIVER BEND
CRAVEN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
FOR CHRISTOPHER B. GARNER
ti
N 59'53'00" E
20.02'
,,UPLAND
J(Ra e
5 g0'21 0 C7 $
GRAPHIC SC=
?RENT RIVER
DATE. s_13-2005 ROBERT M. CHILES, P.E.
JOB NO.: 2005130, ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANT$
SCALE: 1 ._ NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA

07/06/2005 10:30 2526365190
A
2828 None Blvd.
Now Bem, NC 28502
phme:252-036-6610
Fax [phone]
�FaX
Craven County
Planning Dept.
TO MArk Hardeman From Bryan Jones, Planner I
FAM (2S2?247-338Q Detae July 6, 2005
Pagew 3 (induding cover)
PIm�e
Ro 248 Shoreline Dr.
❑ lMgcnt 0 For Review C3Ply Com nmt [3Pleaea Reply D plc=a Recycle
.COMInjefftm
Mark,
Let me know if you need anything else.
Thanks,
Bryan

Meuse River Foundation., Inc.
P.O. Box 15451 - New Bern, NC 28561
[e-mail] - www.neuseriver.org
DOWNSTREAM �
220 South Front Street June 23, 2005 19
a
New Bern, NC 28560 `
252-637-7972 Mr. Mark Hardeman{
252-514-0051 Fax CAMA UN 2 4 2005
400 Commerce Ave.
UPSTREAM Morehead City, NC 28557 IWorehead City Do
112 South Blount Street
Raleigh, NC 27601 Re: Property located at 246 Shoreline Drive (Itiverbend), New Bern, NC
919-856-1180
919-839-0767 Fax Dear Mr. Hardeman,
It has been brought to my attention that permit applications have been
RIVERKEEPERS• submitted to CAMA, DWQ and Craven County to build a family dwelling at
Lower Neuse, the location listed above. I would like to express my serious concern for the
Larry Baldwin
Larry al1970 activities (fill, new home and driveway) planned for this plot as indicated on the
[e-mail] Proposed Plot Plan (see attached).
Upper Neuse, There are several issues that stand out when looking at the plot plan, and I feel
Dean Naujoks that serious consideration needs to be given to the impacts to the associated
919-856-1180
[e-mail] wetlands on the property, the impact to the Riparian Buffer, the question of
Stormwater/Sediment Control and the possibility for the introduction of
nutrients to the Trent River if this property is constructed upon. Seeing as this
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Property is surrounded on three sides by the Trent River, as well as having an
Natalie Baggett interior basin, I oppose the issuance of a permit OR a variance to allow
Phil Bowie construction on this property.
Richard Dove
Richard Goodwin The Plot Plan clearly indicates that the CAMA Line, the 30-foot Neuse River
Mary Ann Harrison Buffer Zone 1, the 20-foot Neuse River Buffer Zone 2 and the Wetland
David McCracken Delineation Line will be violated in several areas of the planned construction
William Olah and by the driveway. I have concern that, even if a house is constructed, the
Robert Overman property owner will take it upon himself to remove vegetative materials from
Sandra Parker
Joseph Seigler the respective buffer areas. This is a practice that we see occurring all too often
and it must not be allowed to continue
I would like to see greater protections be adhered to and submit this letter as an
_ official objection to the proposed. permits being issued or any exemptions being
allowed. I am prepared to follow this through as far as need be to reach a
solution that preserves the health of the Trent River.
Earth Share
OF NOATIi CA-II INA
-We Speak gor The River!
0

Sincerely,
Larry Baldwin
Lower Neuse Riverkeeper®
Cc: Kyle Barnes, DWQ
Tom Steffens, DWQ
Bryan Jones, Craven County Planning Dept.
Scott Jones, Army Corps of Engineers
Robert Row, 244 Shoreline Drive

SHORLL.Mir- ur\lyt-
,P=60.00,
L=46.71'
CH=45.54!
CL,i BRG=N69'20'29"E
`�
.-~
jam-
72-17'33'" E
2.33
s E
N 5'3-53'00-
20.02'
C4
UPLAND
<
CO
DEMIGLIS IED WcT.iRE
A\
A
. N
y;t. i LAND
UPLAND
— 9
I 'u
CAMA LINE/
ZONE 1 '0
mUlEszz RIVER SUF 0 1-7
NE 2/
2()' \,IUE%-zE RIVEREUF::*—R ZC GRAPHIC SC�-L:�7
Ica za
AN
E.
P -LATE 0 E T CHILES, P.
246 S*rjCRELlN-
C)FIVE i5. 'c'
'ice Nc.:
SEND
p �
Wo,;

June 19, 2005
To: Brian Jones, Craven County Planning Department
Mark Hardaman, ��t�+
2/x-e-� r
-2
This is regarding the property at 246 Shoreline Drive and the opportunity for comments
regarding the request for Craven County building and CAMA permits. This property is = -
surrounded by water. On each side is a creek, one of which has a further pond set into the
property. The Trent River runs across the front. Most of the time, a small stream runs from the
Neuse River portion of the lot up into the property towards the pond. Most of the property is
wetlands. Most of the lot is covered with trees, brush, shrubs and water.
This property has been uninhabited for 25 years. Before that, we understand there was a house
built on "stilts" there, but it burnt down. This area is frequently [perhaps 20 times a year]
affected by wind tides. Many times, the property is inaccessible by the drive way and, in effect,
the entire property is predominately under water. In fact the two creeks on either side are
connected, as the drive onto the lot is completely submerged, making the lot an island or in
extreme water completely submerged. With these comments we are including the proposed plot
plan sent to us with the water areas shaded in blue, which makes it more evident the amount and
proximity of water surrounding this property.
First let us note for the record, that the rules for building in wetlands are not easy to come by for
the general public. Responses to our inquiries about the potential for building on the lot have
been confusing and inconsistent. We are referred to the CAMA website but it is not evident
where such rules exist there.
Next, the notification of intent to build at this lot raises serious questions and concerns.
We anticipate that any erosion on the property at 246 will likely increase erosion potential for
our own lot at 244. Naturally, we want to be assured that any building will not hasten or
contribute to erosion at 244, disturb the water quality of the river and surrounding water, or
further silt in the pond and creeks. Also, we want to be assured that any construction on 246 will
not affect our septic system or interfere with our well water.
Looking at the Proposed Plot Plan we will state the obvious that if the rules are enforced, the
buffer zones would obviously preclude any significant building on the uplands as identified on
the proposed plot plan. We are concerned that should a variance to the rules be permitted, the
process of building will disturb the wetlands, the habitat and the quality of water around the lot
due to erosion, runoff and other effects of building.
Since we have been here, we believe the land at 246 has already experienced substantial
shoreline erosion, particularly as a result of the several hurricanes we have had in recent years,
but also the frequent windtides. What stipulations are there for maintaining the trees, bushes and
shrubs on the lot to protect the lot from further erosion?
We note that as part of the building fill is intended. The square footage of the house and fill area
looks substantial. (We calculate that it is being proposed to fill about a 7000 square foot surface
area.) What is the height of the fill?? If it is being proposed to fill to the foundation of a new
house which will be above the high water mark, that will probably be 8 to 10 feet above the
existing level. Because of the small area of land, it would seem necessary that the whole
"upland" would be built up. This is hard to envision -something like a small hill. Is there a huge
retaining wall proposed? Further, we wonder if fill is expected along the drive, because as we

June 19, 2005
To: Brian Jones, Craven County Planning Department
Mark Hardaman, Cep, �%
This is regarding the property at 246 Shoreline Drive and the opportunity for comments
regarding the request for Craven County building and CAMA permits. This property is '.` ,
w
surrounded by water. On each side is a creek, one of which has a further pond set into the
property. The Trent River runs across the front. Most of the time, a small stream runs from the
Neuse River portion of the lot up into the property towards the pond. Most of the property is
wetlands. Most of the lot is covered with trees, brush, shrubs and water.
This property has been uninhabited for 25 years. Before that, we understand there was a house
built on "stilts" there, but it burnt down. This area is frequently [perhaps 20 times a year)
affected by wind tides. Many times, the property is inaccessible by the drive way and, in effect,
the entire property is predominately under water. In fact the two creeks on either side are
connected, as the drive onto the lot is completely submerged, making the lot an island or in
extreme water completely submerged With these comments we are including the proposed plot
plan sent to us with the water areas shaded in blue, which makes it more evident the amount and
proximity of water surrounding this property.
First let us note for the record, that the rules for building in wetlands are not easy to come by for
the general public. Responses to our inquiries about the potential for building on the lot have
been confusing and inconsistent. We are referred to the CAMA website but it is not evident
where such rules exist there.
Next, the notification of intent to build at this lot raises serious questions and concerns.
We anticipate that any erosion on the property at 246 will likely increase erosion potential for
our own lot at 244. Naturally, we want to be assured that any building will not hasten or
contribute to erosion at 244, disturb the water quality of the river and surrounding water, or
further silt in the pond and creeks. Also, we want to be assured that any construction on 246 will
not affect our septic system or interfere with our well water.
Looking at the Proposed Plot Plan we will state the obvious that if the rules are enforced, the
buffer zones would obviously preclude any significant building on the uplands as identified on
the proposed plot plan. We are concerned that should a variance to the rules be permitted, the
process of building will disturb the wetlands, the habitat and the quality of water around the lot
due to erosion, runoff and other effects of building.
Since we have been here, we believe the land at 246 has already experienced substantial
shoreline erosion, particularly as a result of the several hurricanes we have had in recent years,
but also the frequent windtides. What stipulations are there for maintaining the trees, bushes and
shrubs on the lot to protect the lot from further erosion?
We note that as part of the building fill is intended. The square footage of the house and fill area
looks substantial. (We calculate that it is being proposed to fill about a 7000 square foot surface
area.) What is the height of the fill?? If it is being proposed to fill to the foundation of a new
house which will be above the high water mark, that will probably be 8 to 10 feet above the
existing level. Because of the small area of land, it would seem necessary that the whole
"upland" would be built up. This is hard to envision —something like a small hill. Is there a huge
retaining wall proposed? Further, we wonder if fill is expected along the drive, because as we

. \-j'
said it is frequently submerged. What about parking areas? Is it too to be elevated? What
process and guarantees are available to assure that this substantial amount fill will not run into
the creeks and river? How is it possible to contain so much fill in the proximity of the wetlands,
creeks and rivers during construction, given frequent wind tides, etc? Is there any room around
the construction site to allow grading and filling equipment to operate without further damage to
the shoreline?
What protection is proposed for the effect of water flow off the roof? It looks like a 3500 square
foot structure is being proposed. Such water flow can also contribute to erosion.
The access to the proposed building site is along the long narrow gravel drive noted on the
proposed plot plan. There are no obvious buffer zone lines drawn on that part of the plot but it
is obvious that the drive is only a few feet from the creeks. We are concerned about the
removal of trees and erosion resulting from equipment in the act of construction and the
placement of electricity, septic and water lines.
We are concerned about the placement of the septic system. Where is the septic system to go,
given the setback requirements from the road for the River Bend community and the buffer
zones of the two water ways? Most certainly it cannot be located so close to the buffer zones
because of the likelihood of effluent contaminating the water, therefore, we assume it will be
pumped into another part of the lot, closer to the road. How will this pumping system be
constructed without disturbing the buffer zone since it would have to built in the buffer zone??
Is it proposed that the new structure be connected to city water? Again the opportunity for
erosion and destruction of buffer zone area seems substantial.
While we are not experts on reading the survey document, we find the exact location of the
buffer zones confusing. According to the proposed plot plan, there are two 30 foot buffer zone
lines (one for Cama and one for Neuse River). These appear at 2 separate points on the map.
In the drawing, the wetlands and creek in the middle of the property seem to have no bearing on
the location of the buffer zone as drawn on the proposed plot line. Are they not to be
considered?
If a variance is granted, we would like to be informed the reason and rationale.
What does it actually permit? Does it mean that there is no restriction on removal for the trees
and shrubbery in the buffer zones, as long as it is deemed `necessary" for building the structure?
Is there any mitigation possible to offset the damage caused by building.
Reg=tfidly mitted by
Robert and Nancy Row
244 Shoreline Drive
New Bern, NC 28562
252 634 3436I 252 349 2327(cell)
naborowgcox.net
CC: Larry Baldwin, Lower Neuse River Keeper.

")HUHELINE DRIVE
R=60.00'
L=46.71'
CH=45.54'
CH BRG=N69'20'29"E
N 72'17'33" E
2.33'
S 30'07'00" E
/26.11'
"��VN 59'53'00" E
20.02'
t'l
r
i
Mol.,
I , \ `NEiLAND y .
LINE
UPLAND '
30' CAMA LINEUPLAND
30' NUESE RIVER BUFFER ZONE 1 ; i j. u
20' NUESE RIVER BUFFER ZONE 2/' S &0'21'00"
GRAPHIC SCALE,
�0 100
r � ,
PROPOSED PLOT PLAN I�
246 SHORELINE DRIVE �'�'�: FRP�EFT lUl. CHIEFS P.c.
RIVER BENDCRAVEN COUNTY. NCRTN ('AOnl A JCB NO.:2005130
Y

06/30/2005 11:17 2526365190
PAGE 02
County of Craven
0froce of Planning
and
Community Development
Domid R. Baumgardner, Director
Stephanie S. Currier, Assistant Director
Shelton P. Toler, Chief Building Codes rapector
June 30, 2005
Christopher B. Garner
11395 Old US Hwy 52
Winston Salem, NC 27107
RE: DENIAL OF CAMA MINOR DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
Human Services
2828 Neese Boulelmrd
New Ben, Norih Cual(rra
Planning & CD (252)
Fax (252)
kapectionrs (252)
Fac M2)
APPLICATION NO.050614B
Dear Mr. Cramer:
After reviewing your application in conjunction with th[dlopmcnt standards
required by the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) and thse Riven Riparian
Buffer rules, it is my determination that no permit may be granted for the project you
have proposed.
This decision is based on the fact that the proposed development is in direct
violation of the Neuse River. Riparian Buffer Regulations. Also, the Division of Water
Quality has not waived these buffer regulations, nor have they granted a variance from
these rules. Your project calls for the majority of the proposed structure to fall within
Division of Water Quality's fifty -foot riparian buffer off of the Trent River. Should at
•sic time the Division of Water Quality waive their regulations, your application may be
reconsidered for approval.
Should you wish. to appeal my decision to the Coastal Commission or
request a Variance from that group, please contact me so I can provide you with the
proper forms and any other information you may require. Appeal notices must be
received by the Division of Coastal Management in Raleigh within twenty (20) days f
your receipt of this letter in order to be considered.
Sincerely, p
CP
Bryan Jones D C
Local Permit Officer �- o
0.
Enclosure - 01
cc: Mark Hardeman, Division of Coastal Management 0
(7l

06/30/2005 11:17 2526365190
PAGE 01
2828 Nouso Blvd
Now Bem, NC 28562
Phow 252-636-Ml8
Fax 252-83"190
FaX
Tag MArk Hardman Frame Bryan Jones, Planner I
Fwc 252-247-3330 Dad* June 30, 2005
Phonon Pages: 2 (including cover)
Ram CAMA Denial (246 Shoreline Do M.
O Urgent O For Raavlaw Q Please Continent ❑ Please Reply O Please Recycle
•Caniama Itm
Mark,
Please feel free to make any corrections you see fit If you need anything else from me, please let me
know.
Thanks,
Bryan

06/17/2005 11:06 2526365190
PAGE 01
2828 Neuse Blvd.
New Bem, NC 28582
Phono: 252-NO461 B
Fax:252-63&5190
Fax
TO., MArk Hardeman From Bryan Jones
F=c (252)247--3330 Data June 17, 2005
Maim s Patgm 10 (including cover)
Rea CAMA Minor Permit Apprwdon CC:
0 Urgent E3 For Review O Please Conrmealt 17 Please RaWy 0 Please Recycle
•C nuffieMaa
Mark,
Here Is the CAMA Minor Development Permit Application for Christopher B. Gamer at 24e Shoreline
Dr. Also, I have already had some opposition from one of the neighbors who is supposed to submit his
comments to my office. As soon as 1 get them I well forward them to you. If you need anything else
from me, please let me know. My office number is (252) e36-Wl a.
Thanks,
Bryan
r

06/17/2005 11:06 2526365190 PAGE 02
Locality ILt4VC o4 Pe:rmi.t.Number S ��
• plc Ocean Hazard Estuarine Shoreline QRW Shoreline •_. ::.Public -Trust Shoreline ' ' • •Other
?eJ For official use only)
req
pl. GENERAL INFORRMAMN
LAND OWNER
vs' -hoehw 1 - Gc v,,ee
, 74e,
�LIUA4ar OP 12ALO-4�
Address 11 3 `% _65) O 16L tS 14-W H S L
a City ikj 5.6� - +"r State N L Zip �t-'I O _.. Phone -3'1G C11X 5Y1-2—
AUTHORIZED AGENT
If Name a-ck erg�n
Address 11 z S r c w* S 4-
City n State NC- Zip 2 5 S 6D Phone ;1 5-1 ;5 `Y q :� 3 L-
LOCATION OF PROJECT: (Address, street name and/or directions to site. If not oceanfront, what is the name of
If) the adjacent watcrbody?) Aq G S karC km e-es!-
i ?—.4 ex —
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT (List all proposed construction and land disturbance.) CC> %5
DI �r
G- Y� 64'te rb,. 3 6ht L4,Q,f arr tj-v+. laAe.yhe.-L
(Q .o
SIZE OF LOT/PARCEL: 80 %a 4 square feet acres
PROPOSED USE: Residential�Single-family Multi -family )Commerical/Industrial
Other
N(
Ha
TOTAL ENCLOSED FLOOR AREA OF A BUILDING IN THE OCEAN HAZARD AREA OF ENVI-
RONMENTAL CONCERN (A Q: square feet (includes all floors and roof -covered decks)
SIZE OF BUILDING FOOTPRINT AND OTHER IMPERVIOUS OR BUILT -UPON SURFACES IN
THE COASTAL SHORELINE AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL. CONCERN (AEC): sq. ft.
(Calculations include the area of the roof/drip line of all buildings, driveways, covered decks, concrete or masonry patios,
etc. that are within the applicable AEC. Atrach your calculations with the project drawing.)
!w0ithin
se the AEC area that applies to your, property:(1thin 75 feet of Normal High Water for the Estuarine Shoreline AEC
575 feet of Normal High Watcr for the Estuarine Shoreline AEC, adjacent to Outstanding
Resource Waters
(3) within 30 feet of the Public Trust Shoreline AEC
(Contact your Local Permit Officer if you are not sure which AEC applies to your property.)
STATE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT: Is the project located in an area subject to a
State Storrawacer Ma.nageame.nt Permit issued by the N.C. Division of Water Quality?
YE_C NO
If yes, list the Loral built -upon area/impervious surface allowed for your lot or parcel.
square feet.

06/17/2005 11:06 2526365190
PAGE 03
)THER PERMITS MAYBE REQUIRED: The activityyou are planning may require permits other than the CAMA minor
.evelopmcnt permit. As a service we have compiled a list of the kinds of permits that might be required. We suggest you check over the list
ii th your LPO to determine if any of these apply to your project: 7on i ng, Drinking Watcr Well, Septic Tank (or other sanitarywaste
reatment system), Building, Elcctrial, Plumbing, Heating and Air Conditioning, Wulation and Energy Conservation, FIA Certification,
and Dune, Sediment Control, Subdivision Approval, Mobile Home ParkApptoval, Highway, Coanccrion, and others.
►TATEMIENT OF OWNERSHIP:
. the undersigned, an applicant for a CAMA minor development permit, being either the owner of property in an .AEC or a
erson authorized to act as an agent for purposes of applying for a LAMA minor development permit, certify that the person
sted as landowner on this application has a significant interest in the real property described therein. This interest can be
escribed as: (check one)
_an owner or record title. Tide is vested in , see Deed Book
-age ,_ in the County Registry of Dccds.
an owner by virtue of inheritance. Applicant is an heir to the estate of ;
.robate was in County
if orh!:r interest, such as written conrract or lease, explain below or use a separate sheet and attach to this application.
...�► a-o l..a. l3 • �a a-►tiGP wv�o�.a-✓ �.�,.tc�.�' � �Sr�C
JOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS:
furthermore certify that the following persons are owners of properties adjoining this property. I affirm that I have given
.Ci'UAL NOTICE to each of them concerning my intent to develop this pmperry and to apply for a CAMA permit.
(Name) , _ } ! _ (Address) eL/
1) ,pC.J. '<+' Nlcs.r��w¢ {.F-��(/11G i`-iP JNOre.!rti.� Pr Ne.+.J damn
Z) t�ati�k �s. �r�,JL ij) E�t� L'
3)
f)
'OR DEVELOPERS IN OCEAN HAZARD AND ESTUARINE HAzARD AREAS:
acknowledge that the laud owner is aware that the proposed development is planned for an area which may be susceptible to
bsion and/or flooding. I acknowledge that the local permit officer has explained to me the particular hazard problems associ-
ed with this lot. This explanation was accompanied by rccornmendations concerning stabilization and kioodproofing tech-
.quec.
ERMSSION TO ENTER ON LAND:
urthermore certify that I am authorized to grant and do in fact grant permission to the local permit officer and his agents to
rtcr on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information .related to this permit application.
its applicadon includes: general information (this form), a site drawing as described on the back of this application, the
mership statement, the AEC hazard notice where necessary, a check for $100.00 made payable to the locality, and any in.for-
ation as may be provided orally by the applicant. The details of the application as described by these sources are incorporated
diout reference in any permit which may be issued. Deviation from these details will constiture a violation of any permit. Any
rson developing in an AEC without permit is subject to civil, crirninal and administrative action.
This the I D day of f , 20 C
Landowner or person authorized to act as his agent for purpose of filing a CAMA permir application.

NOME OF FILING OF .
APPLICAiIOHFQR CAtNA
.MICR DIV11-QPMENT-..
' . PEHMR•-
lint'::'. `t " MCGS .
113-11g(. Craven
Camty; a:toca �lt/j Sa�w --.
Ized 6 Issue-WU4A per .
mils In Areas of Wran-.
mental Concern,. hereby
giies NOTICE- Ihat • un
June _lk; 2005'Mi: Chris-
tapher•B:GarnFr ippifed
for- a CAMR Oi6it* lot'
the -construgfmn A -a
new home at 246 Shorn
line UL
Th"pplIcallho may be In-
spocted 4.thuaddrass
� ua;uiutq
iattoris'rnay occtlPb�d:'!
on -turRier revidvi'and
comments: !yolks of the-
perptrl declsO In this: I
matter will!6e .gravkied.
upon written regUest
Bryan Jones
CWA Loca[ Pe.frn1I ng
Officer I
Craven Caualy
Address: 2828 t7epsa .
Bordeuard
Ntn Bern, NC 2E582
Ohm: (152)83"618.
lrxtel6,-2Q05 -. �
0
m
m
N
r9
m
cn
r
r9
m
N
cn
N
m
w
m
cn
LD
r9

Lo
co
a
Lo
CD
CD
t`
tD
0
r i (1 4
No I 1 00# ],A
AMA PMRMIT
APPLIM- FO
PROJECT: dopjsTnucrloj,,l OF- 4k NFw tfome-.
COMMENTS ACCEPTED THROUGH TQMI� -17 coos -
APPLICANT:
C4AA'.Tv-er�-A- f, . "q.,je-r—
Ajrn/STw j S*tgj &K— -27 1 o i
FOR MORE DETAILS CONTACT
THE LOCAL PERMIT OFFICER BELOW:
7-'>R-YA.v Sous
.28 xv ArL.14str
_,y{-,w limo, AA_ .2w(. 2
C�r�� G s(- G 6ir

06/17/2005 11:06 2526365190
Office of Planning
and
communlIty Development
County of Craven
Donald R. Baumgwdr wr, DkwtDr
Stephanie 5, Cunler, Assistant Director
Sheltm p. Toler, Chief Building Codes Inspector
June 14, 2005
Christopher B. Gamer
1.1.395 Old US Hwy 52
Winston Salem, NC 27107
Dcar Mr. Gamer:
PAGE 06
Human Serrrlcm Annaot
2828 Neuse Boulevard
New Ban, Nalh Carolina 28562
Plamkig il< CD [phone]
Fax [phone]
Lupecilom (252) 63"987
Fax [phone]
The North Carolina Division of Coastal Management hereby acknowledges receipt of
your application for state approval for minor development of the property located at 246
Shoreline Drive in River Bend in Craven County. It was received on June 14, 2005 and
appears to be adequate for processing at this time. The projected deadline for making a
decision is June 27, 2005,
NCGS 113A-119(b) requires that Notice of an application be posted at the location of the
proposed development. Enclosed you will find a copy of the "Notice of Permit Filing"
postcard which must be posted at the property of your proposed development. You
should post this notice at a conspicuous point along your property where it can be
observed from a public road. Some examples would be; Nailing the notice card to a
telephone pole or tree along the road right -of way fronting the property, or at a point
along the road right-of-way where a private road would Iead one into your property.
Failure to post this notice could result in an incomplete application. Considering your
current home being out of state, I will post this notice on site on your behalf.
An onsite inspection will be made, and if additional information is required, you will be
notified. Please contact me if you have any further questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
Bryan Jon
Local Permit Officer
Enclosure
cc: Stephen Lane, Division of Coastal Management

06/17/2005 11:06 2526365190
PAGE 07
NOTICE OF FILING
OF APPLICATION FOR
CAMA MINOR DEVELOPMENT PERMff
Pursuant to NCGS 113- 119(b), Craven County, a locality authorized to issue
CAMA permits in Areas of Environmental. Concern, hereby gives NOTICE that on June
14, 2005 Mr. Christopher B. Garner applied for a CAMA permit for the construction of a
new home at 246 Shoreline Drive.
The application may be inspected at the address below. Public continents
received by June 27, 2005 will be considered. Later comments will be accepted and
considered up to the time of permit decision. Project modifications may occur based on
.further review and comments. Notice of the permit decision in this matter will be
provided upon written request.
Bryan Jones
CAMA Local Permitting Officer
Craven County
Address: 2828 Neuse Boulevard
New Bern, NC 28562
Phone: [phone]
PLEASE PUBLISH ON: 6-16-05

W
m
Cn
Ln
LID
m
CV
LD
CV
LO
m
tO
m
m
CV
ti
U)
m
CERTIFIED NIAILK RECEI' i
(pomestic MailOn7y; No Insurance Coverage PravlasdJ
o
f, F2WIA USE
m
taeste�a $
iCt.nr
C3
0
CoAW Foe
0-7$:
p "L
G
E3
Retum Pas
(Enionaortiinodl
? i . t %
��
ttera
0
neseictbQDen�xyFee
(EnOWoemeetRagWrsd}
Ln
ru
TutaS Poslape a Fees s
W W205
im-0
P3 Form SE•00. Jun
gi CERTIFIED MAILw RECEIPT
(OOmestlF%flail Only; Na Insurance CPysra3� Provided)
t FAL I A L U S F7
m
Pasta"
s to 3
n
O CeiCsedFee
rsti
F3.30
O
02
5.75
1= ( „sue tBDaeyun�
pabrat
teorr
N(emtdr�t�.UO
$4. 42
ru Tsit Pocmoe a Fees 12
un 4lma
C7
ro
0
wf�BglrNo.
tJc.4j dze t,, -0 -L 2 9:5� 2
t� e mJ

06/17/2005 11:06 2526365190 PAGE 09
R=60.00'
L-46.71'
CH-45.54'
CH I3RC-NSS-20
SHORELINE DRIVE
N 72'17'33' E
2.33'
S 30'07'00" E
, /26.1 V
N 59'53'00" E
\
20.02'
W
w
p �
tD
Q
UPLAND
i
DEMCLIS41ED S
UCE �qy
l \\
jzc7.WEND
WE
/
_$
UPLAND,
w
$Q
3d CAMA LIN �Qa�"�
UPLAND
30' NUESE RIVER BUFFER ZONE 1
11
W
5 so.2ti'00�
20' NUESE RIVER BUFFER ZONE 2
GRAPHIC
SCALE
a
50 100
201
PROPOSED
DRIVE DATE.
246S� Q'-�Oas ROBERT M. CHILES, P.E.
RIVER BEND JOB NO.: 2005130 ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS
CRAVEN COUNTY. NORTH CAROLINA
FOR CHRISTOPHER S. GARNER SCALE: �" 100' NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA

m
m
r
N
m
m
(.n
r
r
m
Q1
N
UI
N
w
m
Ul
r
LD
m
I. -
CD

THIS PAGE WAS INSERTED BY
ONE SOURCE DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS
THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENT(S)
ARE OF POOR QUAL,I'TY
EVERY REASONABLE ATTEMPT
WAS MADE TO IMPROVE THE
QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT(S)