94-2_Best, Dr. Henry_19941201

DEC-15-94 THU 10:40
TOWN OF EMERALD ISLE FAX NO. 19193545068 P.01
nATZ: December 15, 1994
TO., Charles Pigott
FI#)D+t: Carol Arx3us, LPO
M: Henry Best and W F Parker Violaticm, 12101/94, #94-2
I have mailed the violation letter to W. F. Parker, Cmst. regarding the
f i l l ing of lot 203, 10027 Sea breeze pRive, Lands Ehd, but Steve has decided that
the Job was cawleted which will not aIlaw no asw--nueat_ Hie felt the wnrk has
b�en completed and that a fine of $50.00 each should be a% --ease 7.
I wanted you to know why the Ehforcemext letter shows an asses w t of $50.00
when you and I had discussed the jab was possibly still in pr . When you
and I spoke I did not know Wbethex the jcb was finished, which could have allowed
them no asses ent; but Steve felt it was cxmplete.

v
-A-Y-R
ice..&1ff
dVlayos �so �em
ngosdon c%Z �acJ�{dams
C�01MS111101tLR1
9sd _,�P. QVdK.son
Z.a. df .dy
assay g.(Vinson
C Jrhpz gown of 6nzTa,Jffs
7500_ 9m9wa rNill
9M&W a .6J&, --J%dA &W&= 28594-9320
1Pfw— [phone] 9a11. [phone]
December 1, 1994
Dr. Henry Best
7321 Ocean Drive
Emerald Isle, NC 28594
RE: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Dear Dr. Best:
Mir rw�aasa• a a •aoaas a4wh6sm
This letter confirms that I was at 10027 Sea Breeze Drive, Lands End, Block.
48, Lot 203, in Emerald Isle, N.C. on November 30, 1994, to investigate the
possibility of development activity in an Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
without proper authorization. My visit verified that the lot had been graded and
then filled with approximately 15 loads of sand. No Minor Development Permit has
been issued for this development activity.
I request that you immediately cease and desist any further unauthorized
development activities within designated ADC's on this property. If the develop-
ment completed to date is not consistent with the applicable standards, you may
be required to restore the land to its former condition and/or bring all aspects
of the project into compliance. A civil assessment of up to Two Hundred and Fifty
Dollars ($250.00) may be assessed against any violator. Each day that the
develop=ment activity described in this Notice is contiT)i_ied or repeated may con-
stitute a separate violation which is subject to an additional assessment of up
to $250.00. An injunction or criminal penalty may also be sought to enforce any
violation (NC3S 113A-126)
It is the policy of the Coastal Resources Commissioner to levy a minimum
civil assent of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) against all violators of CAMA Minor
Development Permit requirements. This is done to recoup some of the costs of
investigating violations and/or to compensate the public for any damage to its
natural resources. Whether a higher amount will be assessed depends on several
factors, including the nature and amount of resources affected, the extend of the
damage to the resources, and whether full cooperation is forthcoming in bringing
the project into compliance.
Since the work done at this project would have been permitted through a
Minor CAMA Development Permit, restoration will not be necessary; however, do not
proceed with any further development until* you have applied for and received the
Minor Development Permit..
V , J w, I L'I.f.lt _f.iWl..

Pending the satisfactory resolution of the violation, and my submission of
an Enforcement Report to the District Manager of the Division of Coastal Manage-
ment, you will be notified of the amount of your civil assessment.
Thank you for your cooperation in resolving this. important matter. If you
have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 354-3338.
Sincerely,
Stephen C. Harrell
CAMA Local Permit Officer
Dunes and Vegetation Protection Of f icer
cc: DCM Field Representative
W. F. Parker Construction
J