36723_ONSLOW CO. & RANDOL, KERRY_20040105

4
C CAMA / Cl DREDGE & FILL
GENERAL PERMIT Previous permit #
New ❑Modification JComplete Reissue Partial Reissue
��((,�� ,/ Date previous permit issued
As authorized by the State of North Carolina, Department of Environment and Na'tih�i''Re�o c sGG�
and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant to 15A NCAC
E ❑ Rules attached.
Applicant Name_
Address
City State ZIP
Phone#Fax #O
,
Authorized Agent ,0F1 ice(` (T I f , i �. r -t• = - ,�
Affected ❑ CW ❑ EW [PTA i ❑ ES ❑ PTS
AEC(s): ❑ OEA ❑ HHF ❑ IH ❑ UBA ❑ N/A
❑ PWS: El FC:
ORW: yes / no PNA yes / no Crit. Hab. yes / no
Type of Project/ Activity
Project Location: County
Street Address/ State Road/ Lot #(s)
rte= _
Subdivision -
city zIP "`
Phone # (�) _ River Basin LU t
Adj. Wtr. Body' _ nat /man unkn
Closest Maj. Wtr. Body 1I
(Scale: )
Pier (dock) length
Platform(s)
Finger pier(s)
Groin length
number
Bulkhead/ Riprap length
avg distance offshore
max distance offshore_
Basin, channel
cubic yards
Boat rampr-
Boathouse/ Boatlift
-k
;t 4
Beach Bulldozing
Other Vis,.. -;
•
1
s �
Shoreline Length
`l-
SAV: not sure yes no,
Sandbags: not sure yes no
—
Moratorium: n/a yes no
Photos: yes no
Waiver Attached: yes no
A building permit may be required by:
Notes/ Special Conditions
Agent or ant Printe ame
Signature Please read compliance statement o ack of permit
See note on back regarding River Basin rules.
Permit Officer's Signature + j
Issuing /? tQe s ` Expiration Date
cai Plranhmg Jurisdiction Rover File Name
Application Fee(s) Check # Lo

Statement of Compliance and Consistency
This permit is subject to compliance with this application, site drawing and attached general and specific conditions. Any
violation of these terms may subject the permittee to a fine or criminal or civil action; and may cause the permit to become
null and void.
This permit must be on the project site and accessible to the permit officer when the project is inspected for compliance. The
applicant certifies by signing this permit that 1) prior to undertaking any activities authorized by this permit, the applicant will
confer with appropriate local authorities to confirm that this project is consistent with the local land use plan and all local
ordinances, and 2) a written statement or certified mail return receipt has been obtained from the adjacent riparian
landowner(s) .
The State of North Carolina and the Division of Coastal Management, in issuing this permit under the best available
information and belief, certifythatthis project is consistentwith the North Carolina Coastal Management Program.
River Basin Rules Applicable To Your Project:
❑ Tar - Pamlico River Basin Buffer Rules ❑ Other:
❑ Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules
If indicated on front of permit, your project is subject to the Environmental Management Commission's Buffer Rules for the
River Basin checked above due to its location within that River Basin. These buffer rules are enforced by the NC Division of
Water Quality. Contact the Division of Water Quality at the Washington Regional Office (252-946-6481) or the Wilmington
Regional Office (910-395-3900) for more information on how to comply with thesebuffer rules.
Division of Coastal Management Offices
Central Office
Mailing Address:
1638 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638
Location:
Parker -Lincoln Building
2728 Capital Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
919-733-2293 / 1-888-4RCOAST
Fax: [phone]
Elizabeth City District
1367 U.S. 17 South
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
252-264-3901
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Camden, Chowan, Currituck,
Dare, Gates, Pasquotank and Perquimans
Counties)
Morehead City District
151-B Hwy. 24
Hestron Plaza II
Morehead City, NC 28557
202-808-2808
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Carteret, Craven, Onslow -above
New River Inlet- and Pamlico Counties)
www.nccoastalmanagement.net
Washington District
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
252-946-6481
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Beaufort, Bertie, Hertford, Hyde,
Tyrrell and Washington Counties)
Wilmington District
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
910-395-3900
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Brunswick, New Hanover,
Onslow -below New River Inlet- and
Pender Counties)
Revised 10/05/01

AMA / IVDREDGE & FILL
GENERAL PERMIT
f *lew ❑Modification ❑Complete Reissue ❑Partial Reissue
NrO 36723-{
Previous permit #
Date previous permit issued
As authorized by the State of North Carolina, Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant to 15A NCAC C.)
Rules attached.
Applicant Name ect Location: County @ `
Address_��{�A-122o Street Address/ State Road/ Lot #(s)5P— c4' ;
City-J�il 1 State ZIP_ / ..
Phone # Subdivision r /
Authorized Agent 1��(S In (-- wCA City ZIP
CW ❑EW PTA ❑ES PTS Phone # ( ) _ River Basin
Affected _ �� n HHF H ❑ USA � N/A nat man un
AECs
(): kn
j Adj. Wtr. BodyS( L'i1 L
PWS: FC: Q,
�
ORW: yes 'no y PNA yes no Crit. Hab. yes / no
Closest Maj. Wtr. Body- �C
l � l
i
Type of Project/ Activity
Pier (dock) length
Platform(s)
Finger pier(s) ___ __
Groin length
number
Bulkhead/ Riprap length_____ .
avg distance offshore_
max distance offshore
Basin, channel
cubic yards
Boat ramp
Boathouse/ Boatlift
Beach Bulldozing
Other
Shoreline Length
SAV: notsure
yes np
Sandbags: not sure
yes o
Moratorium: n/a
yes no j
Photos:
yes not
Waiver Attached:
yes no)
�S
-" a -V C'G A ' '-3 r SCC :� i
n W( (OK
p
I N -A (tSS L (�C�
2-c� i-\ -''=soL�?�F[jl C U> 1 f5
C_' U c,h
11
C•k. A-c•,c,( T4s <-;O
-�'um� �i TZ�=Cc lsJ��S�•' � � 2 ( � I
-
l�5c r0z�-L._
A building permit may be required
Notes/ Special Conditions IL
Agent or Applicant Printed Name
Signature "Please read compliance statement on back of permit"
r;�-'
Application Fee(s) Check #
See note on back regarding River Basin rules.
r�L C
Issuing
L`
Date
Locale ningJurisdiction Rover File Name

- �MMMMM=
ARCAD IS 11361
infrastructure, buildings, environment, communications
i.630 Plaza Dive. Suite 200 - Highlands Ranch, Colorado 80129 66-763-531
Tel [phone] - Fax [phone]
DATE ll
PAY
TO THE
ORDER OF t Ccxokna^woslon C� ica)ctsit--1 $
DOLLARSrn
NOT GOOD FOR OVER $500.00 t ii
CHOM \.)O -XP 4PTC-F,"
Wachovia Bank, N.A.
Raleigh, NC 27601
0 aM 3V)
FOR NCP30Q1-MC0-Q o. 0-6- —a-
110000 ill 111316 Lill 1:0531076331: 6263 0

A 0
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Michael F. Easley, Governor Charles S. Jones, Acting Director William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Onslow County
C/o Kerry Randel
228 Georgetown Road
Jacksonville, N.C. 28540
Dear Mr. Randel :
Attached is General Permit #36723 C for the expansion of two water treatment plants in areas noted on
enclosed permit.
In order to validate this permit, please sign all three (3) copies as indicated. Retain the white copy for your
files and return the signed yellow and pink copies to us in the enclosed, self-addressed envelope. If the
signed permit copies are not returned to this office before the initiation of development, you will be working
without authorization and will be subject to a Notice of Violation and subsequent civil penalties.
We appreciate your early attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Tere Barrett
Coastal Management Representative
TB/rcb
Enclosures
151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza li, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: www.nccoastaimanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 110% Post consumer Paper

V2ARCADIS
Infrastructure, buildings, environment, communications
Ms. Tere Barrett
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
Morehead City District
Hestron Plaza II
Morehead, North Carolina 28557
JAJ 0 2 2003
Subject:
Additional Information Needed to Complete CAMA Permit Application for Onslow
County Hubert Water Treatment Plant Expansion Project and Associated
Improvements, Onslow County, North Carolina.
Dear Ms. Barrett:
Due to an increase in workload before the holidays, I inadvertently mailed Ms. Erika
Bailey's letter to you without the $100.00 application fee. Enclosed is the
application fee.
I apologize for any delays or confusion this may have created.
Sincerely,
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc.
1�- 4k_
Wanda W. Stephenson
Project Assistant, Water
and Waste Management Practice
Part of a bigger picture
�� GV es
Erika L. Bailey, P.E.�
Project Engineer
ARCADIS G&M of North
Carolina, Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 300
Raleigh,
North Carolina 27607-5073
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
www.arcadis-us.com
WATER AND WASTE
MANAGEMENT
Date:
31 December 2003
Contact:
Wanda Stephenson
Extension:
280
E-mail:
wstephenson@arcadis-
us.com
Our ref:
NC703021.0000

OARCADIS
Infrastructure, buildings, environment, communications
Ms. Tere Barrett
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
Morehead City District
Hestron Plaza II
Morehead, North Carolina 28557
(40'V 0 5 2003
Subject:
Onslow County Hubert Water Treatment Plant Expansion Project and Associated
Improvements, Onslow County, North Carolina.
Dear Ms. Barrett:
ARCADIS has been contracted by Onslow County to develop an Environmental
Assessment (EA) and assist with environmental permitting for proposed expansion of
two existing water treatment plants (WTP) in Onslow County, North Carolina. One
of the water treatment plants, the Hubert WTP, is located within the jurisdiction of
the Morehead City North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (NCDCM)
district office. The Hubert WTP expansion project includes construction of a new
raw water transmission main that will have five navigable stream crossings. Based
on an October 1, 2003 meeting with Jim Gregson from the Wilmington NCDCM
district office and subsequent phone conversation with you, it appears that a Coastal
Area Management Act (CAMA) general permit 1600 will be required for the
proposed stream crossings associated with the Hubert WTP expansion project. This
letter provides a summary of the proposed Hubert WTP expansion project and
presents information regarding the proposed stream crossings.
Onslow County is proposing to expand its existing Hubert WTP and Dixon WTP to
continue to develop the Castle Hayne aquifer as a source of raw water in the County.
The majority of the proposed expansion projects will replace water supplied from the
Cretaceous aquifer with water supplied from the Castle Hayne aquifer. - Onslow
County must plan for the reduction in its water supply capacity due to the new
Central Coastal Plain Capacity Use Area (CCPCUA) regulations for the Cretaceous
aquifer. The CCPCUA regulations will require a reduction of more than 75 percent
in the County's currently permitted Cretaceous wells. The CCPCUA regulation
alone will require the County to obtain more than 4 million gallons per day (mgd) of
alternative water supply. Additionally, the County needs to address an existing water
supply deficit during peak -demand periods. Finally, the proposed project will allow
the County to adequately plan for modest growth increases expected by 2010.
Part of a bigger picture
ARCADIS G&M of North
Carolina, Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 300
Raleigh,
North Carolina 27607-5073
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
www.arcadis-us.com
WATER AND WASTE
MANAGEMENT
Date:
23 October 2003
Contact:
Erika L. Bailey
Extension: 126
E-mail:
[e-mail]
our ref:
NC703021.0000
i'I
CCT Z 2303 I ��
QlVls���,� ��
v f , ►V`i �``i t-„ r-

ARCADIS
To continue to develop the Castle Hayne aquifer as an alternative source of raw
water, Onslow County proposes to expand the Dixon WTP from 2 to 4 mgd and
expand the Hubert WTP from 2 to 6 mgd. The Dixon WTP is located on a 14 -acre
tract in the community of Dixon, south of the intersection of US 17 and NC 210 and
falls under the jurisdiction of the Wilmington NCDCM district office. One raw
water main stream crossing is proposed as part of the Dixon WTP expansion project.
A Nationwide #12 401/404 Permit (Action ID. 200300180) was obtained for the
Dixon raw water main. NCDCM participated in the permitting process for the Dixon
raw water main and provided cohsistency with the 401/404 permit. At an October 1,
2003, jurisdictional wetland verification meeting with the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE), NCDCM, and NC Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ), Jim
Gregson confirmed that no additional CAMA permitting would be required for the
Dixon WTP expansion project.
The Hubert WTP is located on a 15 -acre tract in the Hubert community at the
intersection of NC 172 and NC 24 and falls under the jurisdiction of the Morehead
City NCDCM district office. The enclosed map depicts the improvements associated
with the proposed Hubert WTP expansion pioject. Ten additional wells sites have
been identified to supply additional raw water to the Hubert WTP and will be
connected to the plant through approximately 5.8 miles of new raw water
transmission mains. The mains will be constructed within existing highway rights-
of-way and easements.
The new raw water mains for the Hubert WTP will cross four perennial streams and
one intermittent stream. The crossings, illustrated on the enclosed map, include Bell
Swamp (S1), Queen Creek (S6 and S4), an unnamed tributary (UT) to Queen Creek
(S3), and Pasture Branch (S5). Table 1 provides a summary and information about
the perennial and intermittent streams located along the transmission main corridor.
NCDWQ stream rating forms for each stream crossing are also enclosed for
reference.
Sectional views of each of the propose sings are enclos e.
Directional bores will be used for th Bell Swam S1) and UT t n Cre (S3)
crossings. a enal crossQs ar nned fort ueen Cree S6 and
S4) an Pasture Brand 5) crossings. Directional drills ca ed in these
locations rrowness of the easement and the steepness of the stream bank.
Ms. Tere Barrett
23 October 2003
During August and September 2003, ARCADIS delineated the jurisdictional
wetlands in the project area. Findings from the wetland field studies were discussed
with USACE, NCDWQ, and NCDCM during the October 1, 2003, jurisdictional
wetland verification meeting. �F„ ]EI
;� �, CCT 2 7 12003
Page:
2/3

ARCADIS
It is estimated that up to 0.57 acres of jurisdictional wetlands may be impacted by
construction of the raw water transmission main for the Hubert WTP. However,
wetland impacts may be avoided by constructing the transmission line in the existing
roadway shoulder. None of the identified wetlands are marshes.
Wetlands were also identified at several of the Hubert well sites/access easements,
including: HTW3-Weyerhauser, HTW7-Rogers, HTW8-Bougie, HTW10-Riggs, and
HTW 10-Howard3. All of the identified wetlands are forested inland wetlands. No
marsh wetlands were identified. The USACE and NCDWQ have indicated that a
401/404 permit will be required for construction of the Hubert well sites and
transmission main.
Again, we appreciate your assistance in preparing a CAMA general permit for the
proposed Hubert WTP expansion project. We would like to schedule a meeting with
you to conduct a site visit to the proposed construction areas located within
NCDCM's jurisdiction and complete a general permit application. In the coming
weeks, we will contact you to discuss any additional information that may be
required for the CAMA general permit and to schedule the meeting. Please feel free
to call me at 919-854-1282 if you have any questions or need any additional
information.
Sincerely,
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc.
Erika L. Bailey, P.E.
Project Engineer
Copies:
Jim Gregson, NCDCM
Kerry Randel, Onslow County Public Utilities Department
John Maynard, ARCADIS
file
Ms. Tere Barrett
23 October 2003
DZ' (r-� 'ITT-� '17-11
' ��J IL2 V
CCT 2 7 2033
COA 01V/IS10j"s 0d`
Page:
3/3

I i
I
— — - —i-- ---- - --- ----- — --- -- yu
i
i
I
I i I I
I � t
r, - - ------ - . - - - -- - -- - --
SEPTEMBER 2003
v�
n
I
cri
va
�
�
SEPTEMBER 2003
Oct
v�
I
cri
va
�
�
I
!
I
�
I
7 T is Irl
I
j
I
i
I
i
Oct
v�
cri
va
I
!
�
I
7 T is Irl
10"
I
v�
cri
I
9+'0'C
I I
i.J
2 7 2GG3
L�lVI io�'3 t -
;0100
0 ARCADIS 'OdCRIS ER & TROUTMAN BELL SWAMP DIRECTIONAL BORE
ARCADIS OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS SITE 1
SITE
Water Treatment Plant
801 CORPORATE CENTER DR[VE, SUITE 300
RALEIGH. f0OS NORTH CAROLINA 27607.5073 �� MW PEACHTREEAVENUE,SUITE102 P
TEL• 919/854-1282 FAX- 919/854-5448 VAIMINOTON,NORTH CAROUNA28403 Proposed Raw Water Line
WWW.ARCADIS-US.Com [phone] FAX (91o)397-2971 Onslow County, North Carolina

I
---
I
I
? Site
`C
:
f
i
I
,
L
•
!
j i
{IF
-I
i
I
I
i
I I
i
- -----
I
i
---
---
L
I
i
---
jj E -4
u
I'. C ,T Z 7 2U33
D:V1Sln .l OF
SEPTEMBER 2003
0 ARCADISCRISER & TROUTMAN UT to QUEEN CREEK DIRECTIONAL BORE
ARCADIS OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.11c
Hubert Water Treatment Plant
ENGINEERS
801 CORPORATE
TE CENTER DRIVE. SUITEE SITE 3
300
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27607-5073 �-Y�f•"' WILMINGTON. NORT09 PEACHTREE H Proposed Raw Water Line
NUE. SUITE 102
TEL, 919/854-1282 FAXs 919/854-5448 P
WWW.ARCADIS-US.COM [phone] Fix [phone] Onslow County, North Carolina
NT I
I
? Site
`C
i
I
,
:
I
f—
I
- -----
I
i
i
+
i
I
f:
v;'0
c117'1
C� x
6; (3�
'—.0
,�{ --
O'er U
r0
v� ;
��
0 ,ti
a
ala,
�0
ct:j
:ri::i
ri-
I
I
I I
32-.-00
33
34_C0
35 -OO
3o-00
jj E -4
u
I'. C ,T Z 7 2U33
D:V1Sln .l OF
SEPTEMBER 2003
0 ARCADISCRISER & TROUTMAN UT to QUEEN CREEK DIRECTIONAL BORE
ARCADIS OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.11c
Hubert Water Treatment Plant
ENGINEERS
801 CORPORATE
TE CENTER DRIVE. SUITEE SITE 3
300
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27607-5073 �-Y�f•"' WILMINGTON. NORT09 PEACHTREE H Proposed Raw Water Line
NUE. SUITE 102
TEL, 919/854-1282 FAXs 919/854-5448 P
WWW.ARCADIS-US.COM [phone] Fix [phone] Onslow County, North Carolina
NT I

----------------
l -PVC i
. .... . ....
1----—
j 2
2" }9R2 'v
S
2' SI R2
l -PVC i
31
1----—
j 2
2" }9R2 'v
L
T,:
t L
v
rj
-T
fl;
— -- -----
— ---------- --
------
:d
IA0
ILI
0
q—
al r--
P ILE
-----------
- ------- --
'0- C rk" T 2 7 2G'U3
-7-
SEPTEMBER 2003
1% ARCADIS RISER& TROUTMAN
ARCADIS G&M OF NORTH CAROLINA. ENGINEERS
801 CORPORATE CENTER DRIVE. SUITE INC.i0e t�CONSULTING
I
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27607-5073 3809 PEACHTREE AVENUE. SUITE 102
TEL- 919/854-1282 FAX, 919/854-5448WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
WWW.ARCADIS-US.COM [phone] FAX [phone]
Uri 0
QUEEN CREEK
SITE 4
Hubert Water Treatment Plant
Proposed Raw Water Line
Onslow County, North Carolina
:d
IA0
0
q—
al r--
55�00
5
'0- C rk" T 2 7 2G'U3
SEPTEMBER 2003
1% ARCADIS RISER& TROUTMAN
ARCADIS G&M OF NORTH CAROLINA. ENGINEERS
801 CORPORATE CENTER DRIVE. SUITE INC.i0e t�CONSULTING
I
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27607-5073 3809 PEACHTREE AVENUE. SUITE 102
TEL- 919/854-1282 FAX, 919/854-5448WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
WWW.ARCADIS-US.COM [phone] FAX [phone]
Uri 0
QUEEN CREEK
SITE 4
Hubert Water Treatment Plant
Proposed Raw Water Line
Onslow County, North Carolina

j
(
i
•
I
i
, I
:
+ I }
f
_
t 30 1 Otv! 0' P i P E 1 ? 0 Br i i SP
i
r'11 'i ISID ?Ci' r) 30X= -
XC = I
y— I
----- --- --- ---
I
I
f
_ I
-----------
i
-'------- a — ---
-- ------ �---.._..
� I it •il iE !' i (i�! � � ��_ Gi
:
yV�r
%`i
--;�r-
; �r - ---- –; --
(
t
– I —
I
I r
j
_. I
1_XIS T. S'f BOX QbLV _R I -- - -- - ----
--- —
I I
—IM
9+00+00
2T00
0
�—
- C- 1 2 7 2033
SEPTEMBER 2003
JA ARCADiS
ARCADIS G&M OF NORTH CAROLINA,
CRISER & TROUTMAN
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
+� PASTURE BRANCH -
SITE 5
INC.
801 CORPORATE CENTER DRIVE. SUITE 300
Hubert Water Treatment Plant
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27687-50733809PEACHTREEAVENUE.
TEL- 919/854-1282 FAX, 919/854-5448
SUITE 102
WILMINGTON. NORTH CAROUNA29403
Proposed Raw Water Line
WVV,ARCADIS-US.COM
[phone] FAX [phone]
Onslow County, North Carolina

:
I E
I I
:
I I
•
' 1
r_ . ___ —_�_—_ __. _.__ _ . — �.
!
SEC :� _ �.R E. G _
-- ----------- --..----- -. _.._ _v'_ _.S 17Jar 1
I i I tti'-Tri !\S!DE `GP Or !11QX
------- - ----
:
I
- ---- - --
I
I ---1- •'I
1�-
' :I! I _ ' +
II ! ! -; -- _D1LF I - -
PILE - P.31 -N-15 i- S .6L
I
�i
i ! X:- _18,25 .O' . BOX C' E a?S_
SEE Ll_ i AiL — - - - -
I :
(_._----'----------�f -c- - .------- __.----- -tit- �'�----------I---- ----------------------------- -
I '
+ I I
li; IPiL = NJ S
jSEF e
O 1m C?�= �I iJccO o
if) LO e G cio
p cis �ti Y�� '•�. do ,.:� Vic.
;5+00
7 yl.
1 C; Z 7 NO 1!
SEPTEMBER 2003 -^
0 ARCADIS CRISER & TROUTMAN QUEEN CREEK STREAM CROSSING
ARCADIS OF NORTH CAROLINA. INC: SITE 6
. CONSULTING ENGINEERS Hubert Water Treatment Plant
80l CORPORATE
TE CENTER DRIVE. SUITE 300
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27607-5073 �� 3909 PEACHTREE AVENUE. SUITE 102 Proposed Raw Water Line
TEL [phone] FAX- 919/854-5448 WILMroINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403 P
MVV- ARCADIS-US .COM [phone] FAx [phone] Onslow County, North Carolina

NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name:
Hubert WTP Water Line
Field ID Number:
S1
Date:
August 14, 2003
NOV 0 5 2003
River Basin: County: Evaluator:
White Oak Onslow K. Matthews
Nearest Named Stream: Latitude: Signature:
Bell Swamp
USGS QUAD: Longitude: Location:
Hubert Along SR 1744, approximately 200 ft east of HSWP "Container" Site.
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream—this
rating system should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
I. Geomorphology Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strom
1) Is There A Riffle -Pool Sequence?
0
1
(2)
3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain?
0
1
(2)
3
3) Are Natural Levees Present?
0
(1)
2
3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous?
0
(1)
2
3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Floodplain Present?
0
1
2
(3)
6) Is The Channel Braided?
0
1
(2)
3
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present?
0
(1)
2
3
8) Is There A Bankfall Bench Present?
0
(1)
2
3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 1
(*NOTE: If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0*)
(2)
3
10) Is A 2°a Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On TODD Man And/Or In Field) Present?
Yes --3
(No=O)
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 15
II. Hydroloey Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 0 1 (2) 3
PRIMAR YHYDROLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS: 2
III. Biology
Absent
Weak Moderate
Strom
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed?
3
(2) 1
0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed?
(3)
2 1
0
3 Is Periphyton Present?
(0)
1 2
3
4) Are Bivalves Present?
(0)
1 2
3
PRIMARY BIOLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS: 5
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
I. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? (0) .5 1 1.5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 (.5) 1 1.5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way? 0 .5f" 1 : 1.5 �.
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOL OGY INDICA TOR POINTS:,2.0
CCT 2 7 2003
DIVIS'lor�i O
COASTAL I'VI,AN:A'UE IENT

II. Hydrology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed?
(1.5)
1
.5
0
2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present?
0
(.5)
1
1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present?
(0)
.5
1
1.5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 .5
Last Known Rain? (*NOTE: If Ditch Indicated In #9 Above Skip This Sten And #5 Below*)
1
(.) 1
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry
Conditions Or In Growing Seasonj?
0
.5
1
(1.5)
6) Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel
(Or In Headcut)?
Yes=1.5
No=O
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS. 6.5
III. Biology
Absent
Weak Moderate
Strong
1) Are Fish Present?
0
.5 (1)
1.5
2) Are Amphibians Present?
(0)
.5 1
1.5
3) Are AauaticTurtles Present?
0
(.5) 1
1.5
4) Are Crayfish Present?
0
(5) 1
1.5
5) Are Macrobenthos Present?
0
(.) 1
1.5
6 Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Funggs Present?
(0)
5 1
1.5
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present?
(0)
.5 1
1.5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
(* NOTE. If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1 .75 .5 0 0
As Noted Above Skin This Sten UNLESS SAV Present*).
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS. 2.5
TOTAL POINTS (Printary + Secondary)= 33 (IJ Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least
Intermittent)
IPA
L, GC -T 2 7 2003
L
C0AS1A1- M,AIPA M��r

NCDWO Stream Classification Form
Project Name:
Hubert WTP Waterline
Field ID Number:
S3
Date:
August 14, 2003
River Basin:
White Oak
Nearest Named Stream:
Queen Creek
USGS QUAD:
Hubert
County: Evaluator:
Onslow K. Matthews
Latitude: Signature:
Longitude: Location:
Riggs Road, 0.5 mile south of Anita Rd.
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream --this
rating system should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
I._Geomorphology Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1) Is There A Riffle -Pool Sequence?
0
(1)
2
3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain?
0
1
(2)
3
3) Are Natural Levees Present?
0
(1)
2
3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous?
0
(1)
2
3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Floodplain Present?
0
L)
2
3
6)Is The Channel Braided?
0
(1)
2
3
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present?
0
(1)
2
3
8) Is There A Bankfull Bench Present?
(0)
1
2
3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 1
(*NOTE. YBed & Bank Caused By Ditchinr And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0 *)
(2)
3
10) Is A 2nd Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On TODD Map And/Or In Field) Present?
Yes=3
No=O
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 10
H. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 0 (1) 2 3
PRIMARYHYDROLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS: 1
III. Biology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 (2) 1 0
22)Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? (3) 2 1 0
3) Is Periphyton Present? (0) 1 2 3
PRIMARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 5
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
Geo
`AI
3
CC,T 2 7 22603
D�'ISiOil OF
err. A9 EiACNT
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? (0) 5 1 1.5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way? 0 5 (1) 1.5
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS. 1

II. Hydrology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed?
(1.5)
1
.5
0
2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present?
0
(.5)
1
1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present?
(0)
.5
1
1.5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 .5
Last Known Rain? (*NOTE. If Ditch Indicated In #9 Above Skin This Sten And #5 Below*)
(1)
1.5
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry
Conditions Or In Growing; Season)?
0
.5
(1)
1.5
6) Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel
(Or In Headcut)?
Yes=1.5
No=O
.5
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS. 4
III. Biology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strontt
1) Are Fish Present?
0
(.5)
1
1.5
2 Are Amphibians Present?
(0)
.5
1
1.5
3) Are AquaticTurtles Present?
0
(.5)
1
1.5
4) Are Crayfish Present?
0
(.5)
1
1.5
5) Are Macrobenthos Present?
0
(.5)
1
1.5
6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus Present?
(0)
.5
1
1.5
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present?
(0)
.5
1
1.5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
(* NOTE: If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1 .75 .5 0 0
As Noted Above Skip This Sten UNLESS SAV Present*).
SECONDARY BIOLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS. 2
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary) =23 (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least
Intermittent)
I
CCT 2 7 23013
DIVISIO"I OF
COASTAL NiANAG EMENT

NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name:
River Basin:
County:
Evaluator:
Hubert WTP Waterline
White Oak
Onslow
K. Matthews
Field ID Number:
Nearest Named Stream:
Latitude:
Signature:
S4
Bell Swamp
3) Are Natural Levees Present?
0
Date:
USGS QUAD:
Longitude:
Location:
August 14, 2003
Hubert
Riggs Rd., 200 feet
south of Anita Rd.
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream—this
rating system should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
I. Geomorphology Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1) Is There A Riffle -Pool Sequence?
0
1
(2)
3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain?
0
1
(2)
3
3) Are Natural Levees Present?
0
(1)
2
3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous?
0
(1)
2
3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Floodplain Present?
0
(1)
2
3
6) Is The Channel Braided?
0
(1)
2
3
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present?
0
1
(2)
3
8) Is There A Bankfull Bench Present?
0
(1)
2
3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 1
(*NOTE: if Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0*)
2
(3)
10) Is A 2°d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On TODD Man And/Or In Field) Present?
Yes=3
No=O
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 14
II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 0 1 (2) 3
PRIMA RYHYDROL0GYINDICA TOR POINTS:
III. Biology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? (3) 2 1 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? (3) 2 1 0
3) Is Periphyton Present? 0 (1) 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? 0 (1) 2 3
PRIMA R Y BIOL 0 G Y INDICATOR POINTS: 8
��,
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line) J �
DIVISIO%j OF
I. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? (0) .5 1 1.5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 (.5) 1 1.5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way? 0 .5 (1) 1.5
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS: 1.5

II. Hydrololry
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed?
(1.5)
1
.5
0
2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present?
0
(.5)
1
1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present?
0
(.5)
1
1.5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 .5
Last Known Rain? (*NOTE.- If Ditch Indicated In #9 Above Skip This Step And #5 Below*)
(1)
1.5
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry
Conditions Or In Growing Season)?
0
.5
(1)
1.5
6) Are Hvdric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel
(Or In Headcut)?
Yes=X.5
No=O
1
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS: 6
III. Biology
Absent
Weak Moderate
Strong
1) Are Fish Present?
(0)
.5
1
1.5
2) Are AmMhibians Present?
0
(.5)
1
1.5
3) Are AquaticTurtles Present?
(0)
.5
1
1.5
4) Are Crash Present?
0
(.5)
1
1.5
5) Are Macrobenthos Present?
0
(.5)
1
1.5
6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus Present?
(0)
.5
1
1.5
7) Is Filamentous AIgae Present?
(0)
.5
1
1.5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed?
(* NOTE. If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed
As Noted Above Skip This Step UNLESS SAVPresent*).
SAV Mostly OBL
2 1
Mostly FACW
.75
Mostly FAC
.5
Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
0 0
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS: 1.5
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary) _33 (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least
Intermittent)
1^`
RLJ
CT 27 2�fl3
DIVISION Ot
COASTAL MANAGE
'v!-,'' 't?-...

NCDWO Stream Classification Form
Project Name: River Basin: County: Evaluator:
Hubert WTP Waterline White Oak Onslow K. Matthews
Field ID Number: Nearest Named Stream: Latitude: Signature:
S5 Pasture Branch
Date: USGS QUAD: Longitude: Location:
August 14, 2003 Hubert Hubert Blvd., 0.5 miles east of Parkertown Rd.
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream—this
rating system should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
I. Geomorphology Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1) Is There A Riffle -Pool Sequence?
0
1
(2)
3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain?
0
1
(2)
3
3) Are Natural Levees Present?
0
(1)
2
3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous?
0
1
(2)
3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Floodplain Present?
0
1
(2)
3
6) Is The Channel Braided?
(0)
1
2
3
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present?
0
(1)
2
3
8) Is There A Bankfull Bench Present?
0
(1)
2
3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 1
(*NOTE: If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0*)
2
(3)
10) Is A 2nd Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Tono Man And/Or In Field) Present?
Yes=3
No=O
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 17
II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Dischame Present? 0 1 (2) 3
PRIMARYHYDROLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS: 2
III. Biology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? (3) 2 1 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? (3) 2 1 0
3 Is Periphyton Present? 0 (1) 2 3
PRIMARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS. 8
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
CCT 2 7 2033
I. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong ;. 1
1) Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? (0) .5 1 1.5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 (.5) 1 1.5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way? 0 .5 (1) 1.5
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS: 1.5

H. Hydrology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed?
(1.5)
1
.5
0
2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present?
0
(.5)
1
1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present?
0
(.5)
1
1.5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 .5
Last Known Rain? (*NOTE. YDitch Indicated In #9 Above Skio This Sten And #5 Below*)
1
_
(1.5)
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry
Conditions Or In Growing Season)?
0
.5
1
_
(1.5)
6) Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel
(Or In Headcut)?
Yes --I. 5
No=O
.5
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS: 6
III. Biology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Are Fish Present?
0
(.5)
1
1.5
2) Are Amphibians Present?
0
(.5)
1
1.5
3) Are AquaticTurtles Present?
(0)
.5
1
_
1.5
4) Are Crayfish Present?
0
(.5)
1
1.5
5) Are Macrobenthos Present?
0
(.5)
1
1.5
6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus Present?
(0)
.5
1
1.5
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present?
(0)
.5
1
1.5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV
(* NOTE. If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2
As Noted Above Skio This Steo UNLESS SAV Present*).
Mostly OBL
1
Mostly FACW
.75
Mostly FAC
.5
_
Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
0 0
SECONDARY BIOLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS: 2
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary) =36.5 (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least
Intermittent)
Cr 1 2 7 2003
DIV1SlOi'�tOF P.T
n. T n 1 (U i,j1

NCDWO Stream Classification Form
Project Name:
Hubert WTP Waterline
Field ID Number:
86
Date:
August 14, 2003
River Basin:
White Oak
Nearest Named Stream:
Queen Creek
USGS QUAD:
Hubert
County: Evaluator:
Onslow K. Matthews
Latitude: Signature:
Longitude: Location:
Hubert Blvd., 500 ft east of Starling Rd.
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream—this
rating system should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line
I. Geomorphology Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1) Is There A Riffle -Pool Sequence?
0
1
(2)
3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain?
0
1
(22)
3
3) Are Natural Levees Present?
0
1
(2)
3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous?
0
(1)
2
3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Floodplain Present?
0
1
(2)
3
6) Is The Channel Braided?
(0)
1
2
3
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present?
0
1
(2)
3
8) Is There A Bankfull Bench Present?
0
(1)
2
3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 1
(*NOTE: If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0*2
2
(3)
10) Is A 2"d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Tono Man And/Or In Field) Present?
Yes=3
NO --O
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS: 16
II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharp,e Present? 0 1 2 (3)
PRIMARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS. 3
III. Biology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? (3) 2 1 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? (3) 2 1 0
3) Is Periphyton Present? 0 (1) 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? (0) 1 2 3
PRIMARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 7
IOCT2 7 210103Secondary U., -1.1 Indlcators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
UIV!S10i'1 OF
ENILN 1
I. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1,) Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? (0) .5 1 1.5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 .5 (1) 1.5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way? 0 .5 1 (1.5)
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 2.5

II. Hydrology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
.5
(1)
1.5
2) Are Amvhibians Present?
Present In Streambed?
(1.5)
1
5
0
2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present?
0
5
(1)
1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present?
0
(.5)
1
1.5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since
0
.5
1
6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus Present?
Last Known Rain? (*NOTE. If Ditch Indicated In #9 Above Skin This Sten And #5 Below*)
.5
1
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry
0
.5
1
(1.5)
Conditions Or In Growing Season)?
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed?
(*NOTE. If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed
As Noted Above Skit/ This Sten UNLESS SAV Present*).
SAV Mostly OBL
2 1
Mostly FACW
.75
Mostly FAC
.5
6 Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel
(Or In Headcut)?
Yes=L5
No=O
SECONDARY HYDROLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS: 7.5
III. Biology
Absent
Weak Moderate
Strong
1) Are Fish Present?
0
.5
(1)
1.5
2) Are Amvhibians Present?
0
(.5)
1
1.5
3) Are AquaticTurtles Present?
0
5
(�1)
1.5
4) Are Crayfish Present?
0
.5
L)
1.5
5) Are Macrobenthos Present?
0
5
L)
1.5
6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus Present?
(0)
.5
1
1.5
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present?
0
(.5)
1
1.5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed?
(*NOTE. If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed
As Noted Above Skit/ This Sten UNLESS SAV Present*).
SAV Mostly OBL
2 1
Mostly FACW
.75
Mostly FAC
.5
Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
0 0
SECONDARY BIOLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS: S
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary) =38.5 (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least
Intermittent)
I-)IVI-� tEt <.,t Eli, 1T
co,`,kST` iv. Et/.

1
Table 1: Identification of Perennial and Intermi ent0t S re5ams Al2003ong the Hubert Raw Water Transmission
Main Corridor
Average
Average
Average
NCDWQ
Channel
Bank
Channel
NCDWQ
Stream
classification
Depth
Height
Width
No. Field Label
Index No.
Type
score
Substrate
(feet)
(feet)
(feet)
S1 (Bell
I
19-41-16-1
P
33
Sand
2
4
10
Swamp)
S3 (UT to
3
19-41-16
I
23
Sand
4 to 5
0 to 1
20 to 25
Queen Creek)
S4 (Queen
4
19-41-16
P
33
Sand
0.5 to 1.5
1 to 2
4 to 5
Creek)
S5 (Pasture
5
19-41-16-2
P
36.5
Sand
0.5 to 1
1 to 2
8
Branch)
S6 (Queen
6
19-41-16
P
38.5
Sand/gravel
2
1 to 2
30 to 40
Creek)
I = Intermittent
P = Perennial

SM)th (Uts1A
ARCADIS
HTW10
ck,
J 48
to
t.
At
Legend .�,
Existing Wells (HSW 1-4)
% Phase 1 Wells (HSW 6-10)
I -
Phase 2 Wells (HTW)
N 0 0 E
Existing Transmission Mains
New Transmission Mains
S3
Stream Crossings
Ub.1,
Jdp
4U,
OA -4< -----
it
lu
or
t
(W4 11"
HTW7
"ROGERS"
Ab
-4
A.1 %, , .
6c-�
rI
V Y
"HfN
H WAR
fvh
UDerL FAID
T I
0 AR
r
L I —7z
r '0'
Kellum, Stella IS ; r* I IUIU I UI I I UkJq;-,[ L vv I I L-^F;C;II 1,71WI I
�, "DiN OF
Camp Lejeune, Hubert"' i A '. i , EMENT
CO.f�-SIAL fvAf -A L-

10,
0, ARCADIS
Infrastructure, buildings, environment communications
Ralph Jr., and Carol Conway
195 Hubert Blvd.
Hubert, North Carolina 28539
Subject:
Coastal Area Management Act General Permit
Hubert Water Treatment Plant Expansion and Associated Improvements
Onslow County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. and Ms. Conway:
DEC 10 2003
On behalf of Onslow County, ARCADIS will be submitting a Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA) General Permit Application to the North Carolina
Division of Coastal Management for the Hubert Water Treatment Plant (WTP)
expansion and associated improvements. ARCADIS is the County's engineer for
this project. You have been identified as an adjacent riparian landowner (i.e., you
own property adjacent to CAMA jurisdictional waters) within the project corridor.
This letter is your formal notification of the CAMA General Permit Application per
the North Carolina Administrative Code, Section 15A 07H.
Onslow County is in the process of expanding the Hubert WTP from a capacity of
2 million gallons per day (mgd) to 6 mgd. The Hubert WTP wells currently
withdraw groundwater from the Castle Hayne aquifer. The raw groundwater is
treated and the clean, finished drinking water is distributed to County customers.
This plant expansion will allow the County to continue to develop the Castle Hayne
aquifer as a source of raw water. The County must expand withdrawal in the Castle
Hayne aquifer to offset a major reduction in groundwater withdrawal from the
Cretaceous aquifer per the new Central Coastal Capacity Use Area (CCPUA)
regulations. The CCPUA regulations require a 75 percent reduction in groundwater
withdrawal from all of the County's Cretaceous wells.
In addition to the physical expansion of the Hubert WTP, this project includes the
installation of new wells and raw water transmission mains. Ten well sites have been
identified to supply additional raw water to the Hubert WTP. Theses sites are
identified on the attached map. The new raw water transmission main system
includes 0.8 miles of 16 -inch diameter force main, 5.4 miles of 12 -inch diameter
force main, and six stream crossings. Aerial (above ground) construction methods
will be used for five of the stream crossings, and horizontal directional drilling
methods (tunneling below ground) will be used for one crossing. The location of the
raw water transmission mains is also identified on the attached map.
Part of a bigger picture
ARCADIS G&M of North
Carolina, Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 300
Raleigh,
North Carolina 27607-5073
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
www.arcadis-us.com
WATER AND WASTE
MANAGEMENT
Date:
5 December 2003
Contact:
Erika Bailey
Extension:
126
Email:
[e-mail]
Our ret:
NC703021.0000
�a,�r2'tT

ARCADIS
The CAMA General Permit Application will be submitted on 5 January 2004 and
may be reviewed at the Division of Coastal Management's Morehead City District
Office (151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza II, Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557).
Comments should be provided in writing by 5 February 2004 to the Division of
Coastal Management, Morehead City District Office, attention Ms. Tere Barrett
(151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza II, Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557; telephone
252-808-2808).
Sincerely,
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc.
Erika L. Bailey, PE
Project Engineer
Copies:
Jim Gregson, North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
Tere Barrett, North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
Kerry Randel, Onslow County Public Utilities Department
John Maynard, ARCADIS
Mr. and Ms. Conway
5 December 2003
Page:
2/2

0., ARCADIS
Dec z o 2003
Infrastructure, buildings, environment, communications
James V. and Marguerite S. Cross
105 Barbour Road
Hubert, North Carolina 28539
Subject:
Coastal Area Management Act General Permit
Hubert Water Treatment Plant Expansion and Associated Improvements
Onslow County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. and Ms. Cross:
On behalf of Onslow County, ARCADIS will be submitting a Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA) General Permit Application to the North Carolina
Division of Coastal Management for the Hubert Water Treatment Plant (WTP)
expansion and associated improvements. ARCADIS is the County's engineer for
this project. You have been identified as an adjacent riparian landowner (i.e., you
own property adjacent to CAMA jurisdictional waters) within the project corridor.
This letter is your formal notification of the CAMA General Permit Application per
the North Carolina Administrative Code, Section 15A 07H.
Onslow County is in the process of expanding the Hubert WTP from a capacity of
2 million gallons per day (mgd) to 6 mgd. The Hubert WTP wells currently
withdraw groundwater from the Castle Hayne aquifer. The raw groundwater is
treated and the clean, finished drinking water is distributed to County customers.
This plant expansion will allow the County to continue to develop the Castle Hayne
aquifer as a source of raw water. The County must expand withdrawal in the Castle
Hayne aquifer to offset a major reduction in groundwater withdrawal from the
Cretaceous aquifer per the new Central Coastal Capacity Use Area (CCPUA)
regulations. The CCPUA regulations require a 75 percent reduction in groundwater
withdrawal from all of the County's Cretaceous wells.
In addition to the physical expansion of the Hubert WTP, this project includes the
installation of new wells and raw water transmission mains. Ten well sites have been
identified to supply additional raw water to the Hubert WTP. Theses sites are
identified on the attached map. The new raw water transmission main system
includes 0.8 miles of 16 -inch diameter force main, 5.4 miles of 12 -inch diameter
force main, and six stream crossings. Aerial (above ground) construction methods
will be used for five of the stream crossings, and horizontal directional drilling
methods (tunneling below ground) will be used for one crossing. The location of the
raw water transmission mains is also identified on the attached map.
Part of a bigger picture
ARCADIS G&M of North
Carolina, Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 300
Raleigh,
North Carolina 27607-5073
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
www.arcadis-us.com
WATER AND WASTE
MANAGEMENT
Date:
5 December 2003
Contact:
Erika. Bailey
Extension:
126
Email:
[e-mail]
Our ref:
NC703021.0000

The CAMA General Permit Application will be submitted on 5 January 2004, and
may be reviewed at the Division of Coastal Management Morehead City District
Office (151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza II, Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557).
Comments should be provided in writing by 5 February 2004, to the Division of
Coastal Management, Morehead City District office, attention Ms. Tere Barrett
(151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza II, Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557; telephone
252-808-2808).
Sincerely,
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc.
Erika L. Bailey,PE f
Project Engineer
Copies:
Jim Gregson, North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
Tere Barrett, North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
Kerry Randel, Onslow County Public Utilities Department
John Maynard, ARCADIS
Mr. and Ms. Cross
5 December 2003
Page:
2/2

0, ARCADIS
Infrastructure, buildings, environment, communications
Frances W. Oakes
c/o Francis Walker Johnson
511 Hubert Blvd.
Hubert, North Carolina 28539
Subject:
Coastal Area Management Act General Permit
Hubert Water Treatment Plant Expansion and Associated Improvements
Onslow County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Oakes:
On behalf of Onslow County, ARCADIS will be submitting a Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA) General Permit Application to the North Carolina
Division of Coastal Management for the Hubert Water Treatment Plant (WTP)
expansion and associated improvements. ARCADIS is the County's engineer for
this project. You have been identified as an adjacent riparian landowner (i.e., you
own property adjacent to CAMA jurisdictional waters) within the project corridor.
This letter is your formal notification of the CAMA General Permit Application per
the North Carolina Administrative Code, Section 15A 07H.
Onslow County is in the process of expanding the Hubert WTP from a capacity of
2 million gallons per day (mgd) to 6 mgd. The Hubert WTP wells currently
withdraw groundwater from the Castle Hayne aquifer. The raw groundwater is
treated and the clean, finished drinking water is distributed to County customers.
This plant expansion will allow the County to continue to develop the Castle Hayne
aquifer as a source of raw water. The County must expand withdrawal in the Castle
Hayne aquifer to offset a major reduction in groundwater withdrawal from the
Cretaceous aquifer per the new Central Coastal Capacity Use Area (CCPUA)
regulations. The CCPUA regulations require a 75 percent reduction in groundwater
withdrawal from all of the County's Cretaceous wells.
In addition to the physical expansion of the Hubert WTP, this project includes the
installation of new wells and raw water transmission mains. Ten well sites have been
identified to supply additional raw water to the Hubert WTP. Theses sites are
identified on the attached map. The new raw water transmission main system
includes 0.8 miles of 16 -inch diameter force main, 5.4 miles of 12 -inch diameter
force main, and six stream crossings. Aerial (above ground) construction methods
will be used for five of the stream crossings, and horizontal directional drilling
methods (tunneling below ground) will be used for one crossing. The location of the
raw water transmission mains is also identified on the attached map.
Part of a bigger picture
DEC 10 2003
ARCADIS G&M of North
Carolina, Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 300
Raleigh,
North Carolina 27607-5073
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
www.arcadis-us.com
WATER AND WASTE
MANAGEMENT
Date:
5 December 2003
Contact:
Erika Bailey
Extension:
126
Email:
[e-mail]
Our ref:
NC703021.0000

41
ARCADIS
The CAMA General Permit Application will be submitted on 5 January 2004, and
may be reviewed at the Division of Coastal Management Morehead City District
Office (151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza 11, Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557).
Comments should be provided in writing by 5 February 2004, to the Division of
Coastal Management, Morehead City District office, attention Ms. Tere Barrett
(151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza 11, Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557; telephone
252-808-2808).
Sincerely,
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc.
Erika L. Bailey, PE
Project Engineer
Copies:
Jim Gregson, North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
Tere Barrett, North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
Kerry Randel, Onslow County Public Utilities Department
John Maynard, ARCADIS
Ms. Frances Oakes
5 December 2003
Page:
2/2

0, ARCADIS
Infrastructure, buildings, environment, communications
John M. and Jean T. Hislop
222 Peninsula Manor
Hubert, North Carolina 28539
Subject:
Coastal Area Management Act General Permit
Hubert Water Treatment Plant Expansion and Associated Improvements
Onslow County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. and Ms. Hislop:
DEC 10 2003
On behalf of Onslow County, ARCADIS will be submitting a Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA) General Permit Application to the North Carolina
Division of Coastal Management for the Hubert Water Treatment Plant (WTP)
expansion and associated improvements. ARCADIS is the County's engineer for
this project. You have been identified as an adjacent riparian landowner (i.e., you
own property adjacent to CAMA jurisdictional waters) within the project corridor.
This letter is your formal notification of the CAMA General Permit Application per
the North Carolina Administrative Code, Section 15A 07H.
Onslow County is in the process of expanding the Hubert WTP from a capacity of
2 million gallons per day (mgd) to 6 mgd. The Hubert WTP wells currently
withdraw groundwater from the Castle Hayne aquifer. The raw groundwater is
treated and the clean, finished drinking water is distributed to County customers.
This plant expansion will allow the County to continue to develop the Castle Hayne
aquifer as a source of raw water. The County must expand withdrawal in the Castle
Hayne aquifer to offset a major reduction in groundwater withdrawal from the
Cretaceous aquifer per the new Central Coastal Capacity Use Area (CCPUA)
regulations. The CCPUA regulations require a 75 percent reduction in groundwater
withdrawal from all of the County's Cretaceous wells.
In addition to the physical expansion of the Hubert WTP, this project includes the
installation of new wells and raw water transmission mains. Ten well sites have been
identified to supply additional raw water to the Hubert WTP. Theses sites are
identified on the attached map. The new raw water transmission main system
includes 0.8 miles of 16 -inch diameter force main, 5.4 miles of 12 -inch diameter
force main, and six stream crossings. Aerial (above ground) construction methods
will be used for five of the stream crossings, and horizontal directional drilling
methods (tunneling below ground) will be used for one crossing. The location of the
raw water transmission mains is also identified on the attached map.
Part of a bigger picture
ARCADIS G&M of North
Carolina, Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 300
Raleigh,
North Carolina 27607-5073
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
www.arcadis-us.com
WATER AND WASTE
MANAGEMENT
Date:
5 December 2003
Contact:
Erika Bailey
Extension:
126
Email:
[e-mail]
our ref:
NC703021.0000

The CAMA General Permit Application will be submitted on 5 January 2004, and
may be reviewed at the Division of Coastal Management Morehead City District
Office (151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza II, Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557).
Comments should be provided in writing by 5 February 2004, to the Division of
Coastal Management, Morehead City District office, attention Ms. Tere Barrett
(151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza 11, Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557; telephone
252-808-2808).
Sincerely,
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc.
Erika L. Bailey, PE
Project Engineer
Copies:
Jim Gregson, North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
Tere Barrett, North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
Kerry Randel, Onslow County Public Utilities Department
John Maynard, ARCADIS
Mr. and Ms. Hislop
5 December 2003
Page:
2/2

Q ARCAD IS
Infrastructure, buildings, environment, communications
Stephen Emmitt Gurba
Post Office Box 377
Hubert, North Carolina 28539
Subject:
Coastal Area Management Act General Permit
Hubert Water Treatment Plant Expansion and Associated Improvements
Onslow County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Gurba:
On behalf of Onslow County, ARCADIS will be submitting a Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA) General Permit Application to the North Carolina
Division of Coastal Management for the Hubert Water Treatment Plant (WTP)
expansion and associated improvements. ARCADIS is the County's engineer for
this project. You have been identified as an adjacent riparian landowner (i.e., you
own property adjacent to CAMA jurisdictional waters) within the project corridor.
This letter is your formal notification of the CAMA General Permit Application per
the North Carolina Administrative Code, Section 15A 07H.
Onslow County is in the process of expanding the Hubert WTP from a capacity of
2 million gallons per day (mgd) to 6 mgd. The Hubert WTP wells currently
withdraw groundwater from the Castle Hayne aquifer. The raw groundwater is
treated and the clean, finished drinking water is distributed to County customers.
This plant expansion will allow the County to continue to develop the Castle Hayne
aquifer as a source of raw water. The County must expand withdrawal in the Castle
Hayne aquifer to offset a major reduction in groundwater withdrawal from the
Cretaceous aquifer per the new Central Coastal Capacity Use Area (CCPUA)
regulations. The CCPUA regulations require a 75 percent reduction in groundwater
withdrawal from all of the County's Cretaceous wells.
In addition to the physical expansion of the Hubert WTP, this project includes the
installation of new wells and raw water transmission mains. Ten well sites have been
identified to supply additional raw water to the Hubert WTP. Theses sites are
identified on the attached map. The new raw water transmission main system
includes 0.8 miles of 16 -inch diameter force main, 5.4 miles of 12 -inch diameter
force main, and six stream crossings. Aerial (above ground) construction methods
will be used for five of the stream crossings, and horizontal directional drilling
methods (tunneling below ground) will be used for one crossing. The location of the
raw water transmission mains is also identified on the attached map.
Part of a bigger picture
'EC 1 0 2003
ARCADIS G&M of North
Carolina, Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 300
Raleigh,
North Carolina 27607-5073
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
www.arcadis-us.com
WATER AND WASTE
MANAGEMENT
Date:
5 December 2003
Contact:
Erika Bailey
Extension:
126
Email:
[e-mail]
our ref:
NC703021.0000

ARCADIS
The CAMA General Permit Application will be submitted on 5 January 2004, and
may be reviewed at the Division of Coastal Management Morehead City District
Office (151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza II, Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557).
Comments should be provided in writing by 5 February 2004, to the Division of
Coastal Management, Morehead City District office, attention Ms. Tere Barrett
(151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza Il, Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557; telephone
252-808-2808).
Sincerely,
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc.
Erika L. Bailey, PE
Project Engineer
Copies:
Jim Gregson, North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
Tere Barrett, North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
Kerry Randel, Onslow County Public Utilities Department
John Maynard, ARCADIS
Mr. Stephen Gurba
5 December 2003
Page:
2/2

R
OARCADIS
Infrastructure, buildings, environment communications
Uzzell Enterprises
679 Riggs Road
Hubert, North Carolina 28539
Subject:
Coastal Area Management Act General Permit
Hubert Water Treatment Plant Expansion and Associated Improvements
Onslow County, North Carolina
To Whom It May Concern:
DEC 10 2003
On behalf of Onslow County, ARCADIS will be submitting a Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA) General Permit Application to the North Carolina
Division of Coastal Management for the Hubert Water Treatment Plant (WTP)
expansion and associated improvements. ARCADIS is the County's engineer for
this project. You have been identified as an adjacent riparian landowner (i.e., you
own property adjacent to CAMA jurisdictional waters) within the project corridor.
This letter is your formal notification of the CAMA General Permit Application per
the North Carolina Administrative Code, Section 15A 07H.
Onslow County is in the process of expanding the Hubert WTP from a capacity of
2 million gallons per day (mgd) to 6 mgd. The Hubert WTP wells currently
withdraw groundwater from the Castle Hayne aquifer. The raw groundwater is
treated and the clean, finished drinking water is distributed to County customers.
This plant expansion will allow the County to continue to develop the Castle Hayne
aquifer as a source of raw water. The County must expand withdrawal in the Castle
Hayne aquifer to offset a major reduction in groundwater withdrawal from the
Cretaceous aquifer per the new Central Coastal Capacity Use Area (CCPUA)
regulations. The CCPUA regulations require a 75 percent reduction in groundwater
withdrawal from all of the County's Cretaceous wells.
In addition to the physical expansion of the Hubert WTP, this project includes the
installation of new wells and raw water transmission mains. Ten well sites have been
identified to supply additional raw water to the Hubert WTP. Theses sites are
identified on the attached map. The new raw water transmission main system
includes 0.8 miles of 16 -inch diameter force main, 5.4 miles of 12 -inch diameter
force main, and six stream crossings. Aerial (above ground) construction methods
will be used for five of the stream crossings, and horizontal directional drilling
methods (tunneling below ground) will be used for one crossing. The location of the
raw water transmission mains is also identified on the attached map.
Part of a bigger picture
ARCADIS G&M of North
Carolina, Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 300
Raleigh,
North Carolina 27607-5073
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
www.arcadis-us.com
WATER AND WASTE
MANAGEMENT
Date:
5 December 2003
Contact:
Erika Bailey
Extension:
126
Email:
[e-mail]
Our ref:
NC703021.0000

R
ARCADIS
The CAMA General Permit Application will be submitted on 5 January 2004, and
may be reviewed at the Division of Coastal Management Morehead City District
Office (151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza II, Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557).
Comments should be provided in writing by 5 February 2004, to the Division of
Coastal Management, Morehead City District office, attention Ms. Tere Barrett
(151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza II, Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557; telephone
252-808-2808).
Sincerely,
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc.
Erika L. Bailey, PE
Project Engineer
Copies:
Jim Gregson, North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
Tere Barrett, North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
Kerry Randel, Onslow County Public Utilities Department
John Maynard, ARCADIS
Uzzell Enterprises
5 December 2003
Page:
2/2

OARCADIS
Infrastructure, buildings, environment, communications
Edward O. Cotton
649 Riggs Road
Hubert, North Carolina 28539
Subject:
Coastal Area Management Act General Permit
Hubert Water Treatment Plant Expansion and Associated Improvements
Onslow County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Cotton:
On behalf of Onslow County, ARCADIS will be submitting a Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA) General Permit Application to the North Carolina
Division of Coastal Management for the Hubert Water Treatment Plant (WTP)
expansion and associated improvements. ARCADIS is the County's engineer for
this project. You have been identified as an adjacent riparian landowner (i.e., you
own property adjacent to CAMA jurisdictional waters) within the project corridor.
This letter is your formal notification of the CAMA General Permit Application per
the North Carolina Administrative Code, Section 15A 07H.
Onslow County is in the process of expanding the Hubert WTP from a capacity of
2 million gallons per day (mgd) to 6 mgd. The Hubert WTP wells currently
withdraw groundwater from the Castle Hayne aquifer. The raw groundwater is
treated and the clean, finished drinking water is distributed to County customers.
This plant expansion will allow the County to continue to develop the Castle Hayne
aquifer as a source of raw water. The County must expand withdrawal in the Castle
Hayne aquifer to offset a major reduction in groundwater withdrawal from the
Cretaceous aquifer per the new Central Coastal Capacity Use Area (CCPUA)
regulations. The CCPUA regulations require a 75 percent reduction in groundwater
withdrawal from all of the County's Cretaceous wells.
In addition to the physical expansion of the Hubert WTP, this project includes the
installation of new wells and raw water transmission mains. Ten well sites have been
identified to supply additional raw water to the Hubert WTP. Theses sites are
identified on the attached map. The new raw water transmission main system
includes 0.8 miles of 16 -inch diameter force main, 5.4 miles of 12 -inch diameter
force main, and six stream crossings. Aerial (above ground) construction methods
will be used for five of the stream crossings, and horizontal directional drilling
methods (tunneling below ground) will be used for one crossing. The location of the
raw water transmission mains is also identified on the attached map.
Part of a bigger picture
DEC 10 2003
ARCADIS G&M of North
Carolina, Inc.
801 Corporate center Drive
Suite 300
Raleigh,
North Carolina 27607-5073
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
www.arcadis-us.com
WATER AND WASTE
MANAGEMENT
Date:
5 December 2003
Contact:
Erika Bailey
Extension:
126
Email:
[e-mail]
our ref:
NC703021.0000

ARCADIS
The CAMA General Permit Application will be submitted on 5 January 2004, and
may be reviewed at the Division of Coastal Management Morehead City District
Office (151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza II, Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557).
Comments should be provided in writing by 5 February 2004, to the Division of
Coastal Management, Morehead City District office, attention Ms. Tere Barrett
(151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza H, Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557; telephone
252-808-2808).
Sincerely,
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc.
Erika L. Bailey, P� E
Project Engineer
Copies:
Jim Gregson, North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
Tere Barrett, North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
Kerry Randel, Onslow County Public Utilities Department
John Maynard, ARCADIS
Mr. Edward Cotton
5 December 2003
Page:
2/2

0, ARCADIS
Infrastructure, buildings, environment, communications
D. Maready and William M. Conway Jr.
340 Cypress Creek Road
Wallace, North Carolina 28466
Subject:
Coastal Area Management Act General Permit
Hubert Water Treatment Plant Expansion and Associated Improvements
Onslow County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. and Ms. Conway:
On behalf of Onslow County, ARCADIS will be submitting a Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA) General Permit Application to the North Carolina
Division of Coastal Management for the Hubert Water Treatment Plant (WTP)
expansion and associated improvements. ARCADIS is the County's engineer for
this project. You have been identified as an adjacent riparian landowner (i.e., you
own property adjacent to CAMA jurisdictional waters) within the project corridor.
This letter is your formal notification of the CAMA General Permit Application per
the North Carolina Administrative Code, Section 15A 07H.
Onslow County is in the process of expanding the Hubert WTP from a capacity of
2 million gallons per day (mgd) to 6 mgd. The Hubert WTP wells currently
withdraw groundwater from the Castle Hayne aquifer. The raw groundwater is
treated and the clean, finished drinking water is distributed to County customers.
This plant expansion will allow the County to continue to develop the Castle Hayne
aquifer as a source of raw water. The County must expand withdrawal in the Castle
Hayne aquifer to offset a major reduction in groundwater withdrawal from the
Cretaceous aquifer per the new Central Coastal Capacity Use Area (CCPUA)
regulations. The CCPUA regulations require a 75 percent reduction in groundwater
withdrawal from all of the County's Cretaceous wells.
In addition to the physical expansion of the Hubert WTP, this project includes the
installation of new wells and raw water transmission mains. Ten well sites have been
identified to supply additional raw water to the Hubert WTP. Theses sites are
identified on the attached map. The new raw water transmission main system
includes 0.8 miles of 16 -inch diameter force main, 5.4 miles of 12 -inch diameter
force main, and six stream crossings. Aerial (above ground) construction methods
will be used for five of the stream crossings, and horizontal directional drilling
methods (tunneling below ground) will be used for one crossing. The location of the
raw water transmission mains is also identified on the attached map.
Part of a bigger picture
ARCADIS G&M of North
Carolina, Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 300
Raleigh,
North Carolina 27607-5073
Tel [phone]
fax [phone]
www.arcadis-us.com
WATER AND WASTE
MANAGEMENT
Date:
5 December 2003
Contact:
Erika Bailey
Extension:
126
Email:
[e-mail]
our ref:
NC703021.0000

ARCADIS
The CAMA General Permit Application will be submitted on 5 January 2004, and
may be reviewed at the Division of Coastal Management Morehead City District
Office (151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza II, Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557).
Comments should be provided in writing by 5 February 2004, to the Division of
Coastal Management, Morehead City District office, attention Ms. Tere Barrett
(151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza 11, Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557; telephone
252-808-2808).
Sincerely,
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc.
C.L.+--t'�1L'� =ter C�C�.•S?s�
Erika L. Bailey, PE
Project Engineer
Copies:
Jim Gregson, North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
Tere Barrett, North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
Kerry Randel, Onslow County Public Utilities Department
John Maynard, ARCADIS
Mr. and Ms. Conway
5 December 2003
Page:
2/2

OARCADIS
Infrastructure, buildings, environment communications
Sam P. Hewitt
Hewitt Mobile Homes
250 Hubert Blvd.
Hubert, North Carolina 28539
Subject:
Coastal Area Management Act General Permit
Hubert Water Treatment Plant Expansion and Associated Improvements
Onslow County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Hewitt:
ULIL 1 0 2003
On behalf of Onslow County, ARCADIS will be submitting a Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA) General Permit Application to the North Carolina
Division of Coastal Management for the Hubert Water Treatment Plant (WTP)
expansion and associated improvements. ARCADIS is the County's engineer for
this project. You have been identified as an adjacent riparian landowner (i.e., you
own property adjacent to CAMA jurisdictional waters) within the project corridor.
This letter is your formal notification of the CAMA General Permit Application per
the North Carolina Administrative Code, Section 15A 07H.
Onslow County is in the process of expanding the Hubert WTP from a capacity of
2 million gallons per day (mgd) to 6 mgd. The Hubert WTP wells currently
withdraw groundwater from the Castle Hayne aquifer. The raw groundwater is
treated and the clean, finished drinking water is distributed to County customers.
This plant expansion will allow the County to continue to develop the Castle Hayne
aquifer as a source of raw water. The County must expand withdrawal in the Castle
Hayne aquifer to offset a major reduction in groundwater withdrawal from the
Cretaceous aquifer per the new Central Coastal Capacity Use Area (CCPUA)
regulations. The CCPUA regulations require a 75 percent reduction in groundwater
withdrawal from all of the County's Cretaceous wells.
In addition to the physical expansion of the Hubert WTP, this project includes the
installation of new wells and raw water transmission mains. Ten well sites have been
identified to supply additional raw water to the Hubert WTP. Theses sites are
identified on the attached map. The new raw water transmission main system
includes 0.8 miles of 16 -inch diameter force main, 5.4 miles of 12 -inch diameter
force main, and six stream crossings. Aerial (above ground) construction methods
will be used for five of the stream crossings, and horizontal directional drilling
Part of a bigger picture
ARCADIS G&M of North
Carolina, Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 300
Raleigh,
North Carolina 27607-5073
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
www.arcadis-us.com
WATER AND WASTE
MANAGEMENT
Date:
5 December 2003
Contact:
Erika Bailey
Extension:
126
Email:
[e-mail]
Our ref:
NC703021.0000

IN
0 AIR 0 ;1'.
methods (tunneling below ground) will be used for one crossing. The location of the
raw water transmission mains is also identified on the attached map.
The CAMA General Permit Application will be submitted on 5 January 2004, and
may be reviewed at the Division of Coastal Management Morehead City District
Office (151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza 11, Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557).
Comments should be provided in writing by 5 February 2004, to the Division of
Coastal Management, Morehead City District office, attention Ms. Tere Barrett
(151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza R, Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557; telephone
252-808-2808).
Sincerely,
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc.
Erika L. Bailey, PE
Project Engineer
Copies:
Jim Gregson, North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
Tere Barrett, North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
Kerry Randel, Onslow County Public Utilities Department
John Maynard, ARCADIS
Mr. Sam Hewitt
5 December 2003
Page:
2/2

WATER AND WASTE
Subject: MANAGEMENT
Additional Information Needed to Complete CAMA Permit Application for Onslow
County Hubert Water Treatment Plant Expansion Project and Associated
Improvements, Onslow County, North Carolina.
Dear Ms. Barrett: Date:
29 December 2003
Enclosed is a copy of the additional information that you requested to complete the
Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) general permit 1600 required for the Contact:
proposed stream crossings associated with Onslow County's Hubert Water Treatment Erika L. Bailey
Plant (WTP) expansion project. Per your request, the following items are enclosed:
Extension: 126
■ Certified mail return receipts from all adjacent riparian landowners.
■ A copy of an example letter sent to an adjacent riparian landowner. E-mail:
■ A letter from the design engineer, Criser and Troutman, which certifies that the [e-mail]
raw water transmission main is located within the existing North Carolina
Department of Transportation's (NCDOT) right-of-way. our ref:
■ Contact information for Onslow County Public Utilities Department. NC703021.0000
■ A $100 application fee.
Again, we appreciate your assistance in preparing a CAMA general permit for the
proposed Hubert WTP expansion project. Please call me at 919-854-1282 if you
have any questions or need any additional information.
Sincerely,
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc.
Erika L. Bailey, P.E.
Project Engineer
Copies:
Kerry Randel, Onslow County Public Utilities Department
John Maynard, ARCADIS
File
Part of a bigger picture
JNi�I 0 5 1004
MARCADIS
ARCADIS G&M of North
Infrastructure, buildings, environment communications
Carolina, Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 300
Ms. Tere Barrett
Raleigh,
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina 27607-5073
Morehead City District
Tel [phone]
Hestron Plaza II
Fax [phone]
Morehead, North Carolina 28557
www.arcadis-us.com
WATER AND WASTE
Subject: MANAGEMENT
Additional Information Needed to Complete CAMA Permit Application for Onslow
County Hubert Water Treatment Plant Expansion Project and Associated
Improvements, Onslow County, North Carolina.
Dear Ms. Barrett: Date:
29 December 2003
Enclosed is a copy of the additional information that you requested to complete the
Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) general permit 1600 required for the Contact:
proposed stream crossings associated with Onslow County's Hubert Water Treatment Erika L. Bailey
Plant (WTP) expansion project. Per your request, the following items are enclosed:
Extension: 126
■ Certified mail return receipts from all adjacent riparian landowners.
■ A copy of an example letter sent to an adjacent riparian landowner. E-mail:
■ A letter from the design engineer, Criser and Troutman, which certifies that the [e-mail]
raw water transmission main is located within the existing North Carolina
Department of Transportation's (NCDOT) right-of-way. our ref:
■ Contact information for Onslow County Public Utilities Department. NC703021.0000
■ A $100 application fee.
Again, we appreciate your assistance in preparing a CAMA general permit for the
proposed Hubert WTP expansion project. Please call me at 919-854-1282 if you
have any questions or need any additional information.
Sincerely,
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc.
Erika L. Bailey, P.E.
Project Engineer
Copies:
Kerry Randel, Onslow County Public Utilities Department
John Maynard, ARCADIS
File
Part of a bigger picture

ARCADIS
JAN 0 5 2004
Appendix A
Example Letter to Adjacent
Riparian Landowner and
Certified Mail Return Receipts
from all Adjacent Riparian
Landowners

Property Owner
Address
City, NC ZIP
Subject:
Coastal Area Management Act General Permit
Hubert Water Treatment Plant Expansion and Associated Improvements
Onslow County, North Carolina
Dear Property Owner:
Onslow County will be submitting a Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA)
General Permit Application to the Division of Coastal Management for the Hubert
Water Treatment Plant (WTP) expansion and associated improvements. You have
been identified as an adjacent riparian landowner (i.e., you own property adjacent to
CAMA jurisdictional waters) within the project corridor. This letter is your formal
notification of the CAMA General Permit Application per the North Carolina
Administrative Code Section 15A NCAC 07H.
Onslow County is in the process of expanding the Hubert WTP from 2 million
gallons per day (mgd) to 6 mgd. The Hubert WTP wells currently withdraw
groundwater from the Castle Hayne aquifer. The raw groundwater is treated and
then the clean finished drinking water is distributed to County customers. This plant
expansion will allow the County to continue to develop the Castle Hayne aquifer as a
source of raw water in the County. The County must expand withdrawal in the
Castle Hayne aquifer to offset a major reduction in groundwater withdrawal from the
Cretaceous aquifer per the new Central Coastal Capacity Use Area (CCPUA)
regulations. The CCPUA regulations require a 75 percent reduction in groundwater
withdrawal from all of the County's Cretaceous wells.
In addition to the physical expansion of the Hubert WTP, this project includes the
installation of new wells and raw water transmission mains. Ten well sites have been
identified to supply additional raw water to the Hubert WTP. Theses sites are
identified on the attached map. The raw water transmission main system includes
0.8 miles of 16 -inch diameter force main, 5.4 miles of 12 -inch diameter force main,
and six stream crossings. Aerial (above ground) construction methods will be used
for five of the stream crossings and horizontal directional drilling methods (tunneling
below ground) will be used for one stream crossing. The location of the raw water
transmission mains is also identified on the attached map.
JA;v o 5 2004
ARCADIS G&M of North
Carolina, Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 300
Raleigh,
North Carolina 27607-5073
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
www.arcadis-us.com
WATER AND WASTE
MANAGEMENT
Date:
8 December 2003
Contact:
Erika Bailey
Extension:
126
Email:
[e-mail]
our ref:
NC703021.0000

Property Owner
8 December 2003
The CAMA General Permit Application will be submitted on 5 January 2004 and
may be reviewed at the Division of Coastal Management Morehead City Division of JAN 0 5 2004
Coastal Management District Office (151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza H, Morehead,
North Carolina, 28557). Comments should be provided in writing by 5 February
2004 to the Division of Coastal Management Morehead City District office, attention
Ms. Tere Barrett (151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza II, Morehead, North Carolina,
28557; telephone [phone]).
Sincerely,
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc.
Erika L. Bailey, P.E.
Project Engineer
Copies:
Jim Gregson, North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
Tere Barrett, North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
Kerry Randel, Onslow County Public Utilities Department
John Maynard, ARCADIS
Page:
GAW WMV 03021KAMMLetters to Property Owners\L_Property Owner template.doc 2/2

Names and Addresses of Adjacent Riparian Landowners
CtrPnm C1
Ralph, Jr., and Carol Conway
195 Hubert Blvd.
Hubert, NC 28539
Sam P. Hewitt
Hewitt Mobile Homes
250 Hubert Blvd.
Hubert, NC 28539
D. Maready and William M. Conway Jr.
340 Cypress Creek Road
Wallace, NC 28466
Stream S3
Edward O. Cotton
649 Riggs Road
Hubert, NC 28539
Stream S4
Edward O. Cotton
649 Riggs Road
Hubert, NC 28539
Uzzell Enterprises
679 Riggs Road
Hubert, NC 28539
Stream S5
Stephen Emmitt Gurba
P.O. Box 377
Hubert, NC 28539
John M. and Jean T. Hislop
222 Peninsula Manor
Hubert, NC 28539
AN 0 5 2004

Stream S6
Frances W. Oakes
c/o Francis Walker Johnson
511 Hubert Blvd.
Hubert, NC 28539
James V. and Marguerite S. Cross ,JAN
105 Barbour Road 2004
Hubert, NC 28539

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
A. s1 IS iture
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
X f�+/t7 Agent
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
❑ Add ss.
so that we can return the card to you.
m
B. Received by rintddress
C.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
D. Is delivery add r nt from item 1? ❑ Y s
1. Article Addressed to:
If YES, enter delivbelow: ❑ o
Uzzell Enterprises
679 Riggs Road
JAN
Hubert, NC 28539
3. Service Type
❑ Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandi
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number �l o `j _/
� 004Z G(O 3(f X09 2
l l J
(Transfer from service label) I
/ IIJJ J
PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M=
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Edward O. Cotton
649 Riggs Road
Hubert, NC 28539
A.
Agent
B. Received fs nt d Name) C. at /Qel' e
D. Is delivery add d' erent from item V L# Yest
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Service Type
❑ Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandi
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number �� Qq I 3 I 60 ,ten/a f 63 f /
(Transfer from service label) V `/ �/ (JtIJ 7
PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
D. Maready and William M Conway, IT.
340 Cypress Creek Road
Wallace, NC 28466
102595 -02 -M --
A. Signature
XCP.i�� 5artvve�1
❑ Address
B. Received by( Printed Name) C. Da of live
iIA;Q Sunrjer-<Dlld
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: R o
3. Service Type
❑ Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandi
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number •-7
(Transfer
ranfer from service label) e
PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 102595.02-M-

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A. nature `
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ���
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you. B. Receive y ri e Name) C.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
D. Is delivery addres Brent from item 1?
1. Article Addressed to: If YES, enter delivery address below:
James V. and Marguerite S. Cross:
105 Barbour Road
Hubert, NC 28539
t
3. Service Type
❑ Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandi
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number -Ito � / /6
0 0O f /� e 03 J
7
(Transfer from service label) q � 7 7 7 J
PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Frances W. Oakes
c/o Francis Walker Johnson
511 Hubert Blvd.
Hubert, NC 28539
102595-02-M-'
A. Signature
X Agent
Address
B. Received by( Printed N e C. Date of Delive
/h AR V/ , (A- A)Mh ) r J'7 -to
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Service Type
❑ Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandi
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number `n� �j /,, � J
(Transfer from service label) O 1 / O� VCl o `� S -I
PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M--
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to
John M. and Jean T. Hislop
222 Peninsula Manor
Hubert, NC 28539
A. Signatur
❑ Agent
❑ Address
B. eived by (Printed Name) C. Dat of live
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Service Type
❑ Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandi
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number ?pf
(Transfer from service label) ^ vCj f Ci iG/ 3� f ;y lli
PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
A.Si nature
X � Q1)(Agent
❑ Address
B. Received bzt me) C.
D. Is delivery address jifferent from item 1? es
If YES, enter deliveNLaddress below: ❑ No
Sam P. Hewitt
Hewitt Mobile Homes
250 Hubert Blvd. N
Hubert, NC 28539 3. Service Type
❑ Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchand
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number
(Transfer from service label)
PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Ralph Jr., and Carol Conway
195 Hubert Blvd.
Hubert, NC 28539
A. Signature
❑ Agent
X V k % ❑ Address
B. Received by (Printed Name) C. Dat
,Uof �elive
\l3
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Service Type
❑ Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchand
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article NumberC G� �,/-�
(Transfer from service label) I / ! ' 3 yb0 F/C//� OfG'J 7 --)'
PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Stephen Emmitt Gurba
P.O. Box 377
Hubert, NC 28539
A. Signat
X / ❑ Agent
❑ Address
B. Received by (P/rued Name) C. Date of Delivi
S / n/14 CT U
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Service Type
❑ Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchand
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number — ( 7 O ` � 3 �Co 60/� 663V
V --,20Y& O Y
(Transfer from service label) J
PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-

ARCADIS
Appendix B
Letter from Criser and Troutman
Certifying Water Transmission
Main Located within Existing
Highway Right-of-way.

'id � CRISER & TROUTMAN CONSULTING ENGINEERS
HHH601-
■■■■■■
a 2G04
December 11, 2003
Erika L. Bailey, P.E. C'EIVED
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc. DEC 1 � 9 n
801 Corporate Center Drive, Ste 300 ;-,_s� wig t,
Raleigh, NC 27607 � Y & Miller
RE: Onslow County Hubert Water Treatment Plant Expansion
And Associated Improvements
Onslow County, North Carolina
Dear Mrs. Bailey:
We have reviewed our design plans and all of the proposed stream crossings by the raw
water transmission main are located within the existing North Carolina Department of
Transportation's (NCDOT) right-of-way. Onslow County has acquired an Encroachment
Agreement with NCDOT that allows Onslow County to install the water mains on the
NCDOT right-of-way.
Should you have any questions in this matter please contact our office.
_Sincerely yours,
v
David E. Criser, P.E.
President
DEC/tmp/4967.01
P.O. BOX 3727 • 3809 PEACHTREE AVENUE, SUITE 102 • WILMINGTON, N.C. 28406 • [phone] • FAX [phone]

ARCADiS
Appendix C
Onslow County Public Utilities
Department Contact
Information and $100
Application Fee

Onslow County Public Utilities Department Contact Information
Onslow County Public Utilities Department
Attention: Mr. Kerry Randel, Public Utilities Director
228 Georgetown, Rd
Jacksonville, NC 28540
[phone]
lf�:�� 0 5 2004