23664_WHEELIS, DON_20000619

CAMA and DREDGE AND FILL 60
G E N E R A L 236 4- `'
PERMIT
as authorized by the State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Coastal Resources Commission
in an area of environmental concern pursuant to 15 NCAC
Applicant Name
Address ,
City
Project Location (County, State Road, Water Body, etc.)
Type of Project Activity
PROJECT DESCRIPTION SKETCH
Pier (dock) Length � Y at)
Groin Length
number
Bulkhead Length
max. distance offshore
Basin, channel dimensions
cubic yards
Boat ramp dimensions
Other
Phone Number
State Zip
r
This permit is subject to compliance with this application, site drawing
and attached general and specific conditions. Any violation of these terms
may subject the permittee to a fine, imprisonment or civil action; and
may cause the permit to become null and void.
This permit must be on the project site and accessible to the permit of-
ficer when the project is inspected for compliance. The applicant certi-
fies by signing this permit that 1) this project is consistent with the local
land use plan and all local ordinances, and 2) a written statement has
been obtained from adjacent riparian landowners certifying that they
have no objections to the proposed work.
In issuing this permit the State of North Carolina certifies that this project
is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal Management Program.
n
issuing date
12 G'd
(SCALE: ?
applicant's signature
permit officer's signature
expiration date
attachments
application fee

PAY TO THE
ORDER OP_
t5 ' E
LINDA KENAN 66-85/531 4282
199-2802 PH. 252-504-47pp0 ,n 0280081449
BEAUFORT, NC 28516 b _
DATE
t entura Bank..
Momhcad City, NC 28557
MEMO Y .,GA L,(v--1
l:0S31008"SO 1:O2" i449li'
s 's-b' (-Q-Q
—DOLLARS B

1
(rv�mr. ut r['uuu Lr V TT LLB.• I
APR-26-2000 WED 08 : 02 AM NC D 1 V OF COASTAL MGMNn 1 I FAX v 1NO �2522473330
A) JACEN't• kuY �
(FOR A PIER/MOORING PILINGSIBOA TLIFTIBOATHO USE)
P. 02
J ,
i
I hereb certify that T own property adjacent to 1A0� Owner
y (Name of property Ow )
Property located atL 4 _
(Lot, Block, Road, etc.)
on i
N,C
in , .
(Waterbody) (Town an /or County)
He has describer) to me, as shown below, the development he is proposing at that location,
no objections to his proposal. I understand that a pier/mooring
and, I have
pihngs/boatlift/boathouse must be set back a minimum distance of fifteen feet (IS') from my area
of riparian access unless waived by me.
I do not wish to waive the setback requirement.
I dD wish to waive that setback requirement-
----- ----------------------
------------------- ------------------------------------
DESCRfPTION AND/OR DRAWING OF PROPOSED DEYRLOPI E
(To be filled in by individual proposing dev�Ipprnent)
i�e fact✓ o i�, I e
� �J41 P,
9
-P k�s
X;�-O-�
i
--------------------
Signature
Print or Type Name
ada- a qj - q g1
Telephone Number/ 1
Date:�� �—d

Century2l
pagina I van 1
May 5, 2000
Century 21 - Coastal Properties
P.O. Box 1089, 610 Atlantic Beach Causeway
Atlantic Beach, N.C. 28512
Re: Proposed Dock/Boat Lift Construction for:
Lot L16, 114 Teak Ct., Pine Knoll Shores N.C. 28512
Attention: Ms. Linda Kenan
Following the receipt of your April 28, 2000 letter which arrived here in Amsterdam on May 4,
2000, where we are awaiting the arrival of our grandchild, I called your office to obtain some
clarification on the material you sent. I do appreciate your returning my call the same day.
Based on our conversation, it is my understanding that Mr. Ed Mochel, my adjoining neighbor,
has a contingency contract for the sale of his property at 114 Teak Ct. The affixed contingency for
this sale is obtaining the necessary approvals for the construction of a new boat dock 20 feet long
and 6 feet wide with an adjoining boat lift. At the present time Mr. Mochel has a boat dock
without a lift located at a different location. He is not requesting any waiver to the 15 foot
setbacks from the existing property lines.
Since becoming a permanent resident at 112 Teak Ct. on December 1, 1996, it has been my
observation that Mr. Mochel has been a very infrequent visitor to his property, staying less than a
week, perhaps twice a year. While I can appreciate Mr. Mochel's personal interest in obtaining the
necessary approvals for the referenced construction, he has not considered what occurs within the
proposed construction area without living here full time. The proposed construction location will
protrude out into the channel of the canal that serves as the main entrance and exit from the Davis
Boat Landing ramp. This ramp gets considerable usage. The water area where Mr. Mochel
proposes the new construction is presently utilized by boaters to maneuver their boats for docking
to present mooring locations; turning around since some boats are too big to pass under the bridge
at Mimosa Blvd., and stacking up while awaiting access to the boat ramp. I don't feel Mr. Mochel
is aware of these situations.
With the proposed size of the dock and lift extending out from the shore line approximately 14
to 16 feet, a blind spot will be created between the main channel and the Davis Landing Channel.
This is a serious and critical situation. With the construction located elsewhere, the potential for a
serious accident can be avoided. I am a boat owner and do moor my boat at a dock smaller than
the one proposed, but I do not have a lift. As such we do have some true- to- life experiences at
this location.
Based on the foregoing observations, I do not support the construction of the boat dock and lift
at the proposed location and request this disapproval be duly recorded. I do not have any objection
to having a new dock/lift constructed at the present dock location.
I will be back in Pine Knoll shores on May 22, 2000 if anyone wishes to discuss my position on
this objection.
Sincerely
Keith D. Kelley
Copies: Division of Coastal Management, Attn: Mr. Ed Tyndel
Roy Bromlow, Pine Knoll Shores - Building Inspector

05-MEI-00 15:09 B+J Knaven-Kelley [phone] PRGINR: 1
1
Century2l pagina i
May 5, 2000
Century 21 - Coastal Properties
P 0 Box 1089, 610 Atlantic Beach Causeway
Atlantic Beach, N.C. 28512
Re. Proposed Dock/Boat Lift Construction for
Lot L16, 114 Teak Ct., Pine Knoll Shores N.C. 28512
Attention. Ms. Linda Kenan
Following the receipt of your April 28, 2000 letter which arrived here in Amsterdam on May 4,
2000, where we are awaiting the arrival of our grandchild, I called your office to obtain some
clarification on the material you sent. I do appreciate your returning my call the same day
Based on our conversation, it is my understanding that Mr. Ed Mochel, my adjoining neighbor,
has a contingency contract for the sale of his property at 1 14 Teak Ct. The affixed contingency fo(
this sale is obtaining the necessary approvals for the construction of a new boat dock 20 feet long
and 6 feet wide with an adjoining boat lift At the present time Mr. Mochel has a boat dock
without a lift located at a different location He is not requesting any waiver to the 15 foot
setbacks from the existing property lines.
Since becoming a permanent resident at 112 Teak Ct on December 1, 1996, it has been my
observation that Mr Mochel has been a very infrequent visitor to his property, staying less than a
week, perhaps twice a year. While 1 can appreciate Mr Mochel's personal interest in obtaining the
necessary approvals for the referenced construction, he has not considered what occurs within the
proposed construction area without living here toll time The proposed construction location will
protrude out into the channel of the canal that serves as the main entrance and exit from the Davis
Boat Landing ramp This ramp gets considerable usage. The water area where Mr Mochel
proposes the new construction is presently utilized by boaters to maneuver their boats for docking
to present mooring locations, turning around since some boats are too big to pass under the bridge
at Mimosa Blvd , and stacking up while awaiting access to the boat ramp 1 don't feel Mr Mochel 1
is aware of these situations. ,
With the proposed size of the dock and lift extending out from the shore line approximately 14
to 16 feet, a blind spot will be created between the main channel and the Davis Landing Channel.
This is a serious and critical situation With the construction located elsewhere, the potential for a
serious accident can be avoided 1 am a boat owner and do moor my boat at a dock smaller than
the one proposed, but I do not have a lift As such we do have some true- to- tire experiences at
this location I
I
Based on the foregoing observations, I do not support the construction of the boat dock and lift
at the proposed location and request this disapproval be duly recorded i do not have any objection
to having a new dock/lift constructed at the present dock location.
I will be back in Pine Knoll shores on May 22, 2000 if anyone wishes to discuss my position on i
this objection
Sincer
C), lm�-c
Keith D. Kelley
Copies' Division of Coastal Management, Attn Mr Ed Tyndel
Roy Bromlow, Pine Knoll Shores - Building Inspector

April 28, 2000
Keith and Sandy Kelley
112 Teak Court
Pine Knoll Shores N.C. 28512
Dear Keith and Sandy,
Hope all is well with your new family member and her Mommy! !
Carol gave me your address after I explained why I needed to get in touch with you.
I have listed Ed Mochel's house at 114 Teak Court. I also have it under contract. The Buyer is seeking a
CAMA permit to install a new dock and a boat lift. It does not require waiving of 15' setback (see
proposed diagram). According to CAMA regulations the adjacent property owners must be notified and
given the opportunity of signing off on it. Since you were not home, I followed the notification "by return
receipt requested" specifications. Then I saw Carol and got your address. If you do not respond the
permit will be issued in ten days. If you choose to respond the address is on the enclosed form.
Hope you have a delightful visit and a safe return trip home. Call me if you have questions.
Service is my Specialty,
Linda Kenan
Century 21 Coastal Properties
252-726-4700

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION/WAIVER FORM
Name of Individual applying for Permit: fk acZ' DC�1
Address of Property:
l -4ea,� 1�
(Lot or Street #, Street or Road, City & County)
o28's%i
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to the above referenced property. The individual
applying for this permit has described to me as shown on the attached drawing the development
they are proposing. A description or drawing, with dimensions, should be provided with this
letter.
I have no objections to this proposal.
If you have objections to what is being proposed, please write the Division of Coastal
Management, Hestron Plaza II, 151-B, Hwy. 24, Morehead City, NC, 28557 or call (252) 808-
2808 within 10 days of receipt of this notice. No response is considered the same as no objection
if you have been notified by Certified Mail,
WAIVER SECTION
I understand that a pier, dock, mooring pilings, breakwater, boat house, lift or sandbags must be
set back a minimum distance of 15' from my area of riparian access unless waived by me. (If you
wish to waive the setback, you must initial the appropriate blank below.)
y� -
/7 I do wish to waive the 15' setback requirement. �' A"i1 2000
T'— I do not wish to waive the 15' setback requirement. k
Signature Date
kr IL keo_ e y
Print Name
Telephone Number With Area Code
t.. ---
610 Atlantic Beach Causeway
Atlantic Beach, North Carolina 28512
Each Office is Independently Owned And Operated

05-MEI-00 15:18
Century2l
May 5, 2000
B+J Knaven-Kelley [phone] PAGINA: 1
Century 21 - Coastal Properties
P, O. Box 1089, 610 Atlantic Beacl
Atlantic Beach, N.C. 28512
Re: Proposed Dock/Boat Lift Con
Lot L16, 114 Teak Ct,, Pine K
,Attention: Ms. Linda Kenan
Following the receipt of your Ape„ Lo, cvvv truer wnicn amvea nere m Amsterdam on May 4, ,
2000, where we are awaiting the arrival of our grandchild, 1 called your office to obtain some
clarification on the material you sent. I do appreciate your returning my call the same day.
Based on our conversation, it is my understanding that Mr, Ed Mochel, my adjoining neighbor,
has a contingency contract for the sale of his property at 114 Teak Ct. The affixed contingency fot
this sale is obtaining the necessary approvals for the construction of a new boat dock 20 feet long
and 6 feet wide with an adjoining boat lift. At the present time Mr, Mochel has a boat dock
without a lift located at a different location. He is not requesting any waiver to the 15 foot
setbacks from the existing property lines.
Since becoming a permanent resident at 112 Teak Ct, on December 1, 1996, it has been my
observation that Mr, Mochel has been a very infrequent visitor to his property, staying less than a
week, perhaps twice a year, While I can appreciate Mr. Mochel's personal interest in obtaining the
necessary approvals for the referenced construction, he has not considered what occurs within the
proposed construction area without living here full time. The proposed construction location will
protrude out into the channel of the canal that serves as the main entrance and exit from the Davis
Boat Landing ramp. This ramp gets considerable usage. The water area where Mr. Mochel
proposes the new construction is presently utilized by boaters to maneuver their boats for docking
to present mooring locations, turning around since some boats are too big to pass under the bridge
at Mimosa Blvd., and stacking up while awaiting access to the boat ramp, I don't feel Mr. Mochel
is aware of these situations.
With the proposed size of the dock and lift extending out from the shore line approximately 14
to 16 feet, a blind spot will be created between the main channel and the Davis Landing Channel.
This is a serious and critical situation. With the construction located elsewhere, the. potential for a
serious accident can be avoided. l am a boat owner and do moor my boat at a dock smaller than
the one proposed, but I do not have a lift. As such we do have some true- to- life experiences at
this location.
Based on the foregoing observations, I do not support the construction of the boat dock and lift
at the proposed location and request this disapproval be duly recorded. I do not have any objectio
to having a new dock/lift constructed at the present dock location,
I will be back in Pine Knoll shores on May 22, 2000 if anyone wishes to discuss my position on
this objection.
Sincerely,
a,
Keith D. Kelley
Copies: Division of Coastal Management, Attn: Mr. Ed Tyndel
Roy Bromlow, Pine Knoll Shores � Building Inspector