The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About21517_NC DOT_19990320CAMA AND DREDGE AND FILL '�wr GENERALS 0 21 ) PERMIT *40 as authorized by the State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant to 15A NCAC Applicant Name Address City Project Location (County, State Road, Water Body, etc.) _ Type of Project Activity PROJECT DESCRIPTION Pier (dock) length Groin length number Bulkhead length max. distance offshore Basin, channel dimensions cubic yards Boat ramp dimensions Other Phone Number State Zip SKETCH .�—�i , ty 1, � (SCALE: t -tip � �.- �,,-" � ,\ ,•,,,. (t ?7 1 S This permit is subject to compliance with this application, site drawing and attached general and specific conditions. Any violation of these terms may subject the permittee to a fine, imprisonment or civil action; and may cause the permit to be- come null and void. This permit must be on the project site and accessible to the permit officer when the project is inspected for compliance. The applicant certifies by signing this permit that 1) this pro- ject is consistent with the local land use plan and all local ordinances, and 2) a written statement has been obtained from adjacent riparian landowners certifying that they have no objections to the proposed work. attachments issuing date applicant's signature permit officer's signature expiration date In issuing this permit the State of North Carolina certifies that this project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal application fee Management Program. 4�L]lJL]L•ll:]L]Lll:]LJLJLiL]Lll:]L]ULII]Ul]7�.1L11�]L I Iil �i.l il:; Ui�� .�, , p i..1.0 f•AP HACKGROUNU ON WHIiE EH. WANNIN(;' THIS IAIGH NUMtlEH BLCEpS 1HHU PINK TO 111C BACK S L L J�JL1jFf]LJ"]CJ[JCII�JLI � 'J - C.(CPC.I7[.(LrCPCPC.(CP[.if»C.nC.r SAATFej 66-1059 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA s31 a n DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA T� Warrant No. PAY TO MO. DAY YR. AMOUNT THE ORDER OF: N.C. DEPT OF ENVIRONMENT AND Z ZZ__9 5d.d0 NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT ..HESTRON PLAZA II 191 H HWY 24 M O R E H E A D CITY N.C. 2 8 5 5 7 C S PRESENT TO: STATE TREASURER � � i, } •. PAYABLE AT PAR THROUGH FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM jfF '� Y• °�� sz:: .:: r. �.c rs6��• .... Vn.]R]R]R]R.1Cl]R]�L1R]Tl]CL]�L1R]Rl�l.lCl.]RL] BEFORE ACCEPTING THIS DOCUMENT PLEASE EXAMINE FOR GENUINE WATERMARK FRONT88ACK. iHI500CUMENT HAS VISIBLE FIBERSAND INVISIBLE FLUORESGENTFIBERS. �r n��cP[PcPcP[PcP[PcPFJ�J@P[PcPcPGPcPcP Bocsu� Sovni D � a � S�FcpP 1 ?Ro �' V41 P)IS Sf,CPIF,En/ D. h1��KILrK i�ow�r� �d�U�rs��►' 1noe'fA¢6 C s r r, n/_G i /3nPT I sR 1-727 1 i I � I � yx\\\ %�'� E X ; ST►nJ Cs Krdl" Q. 13Pow►d 5p. N)(.r{wAYPA/ �i1rNPoR�'.�l.� . ::�S !ir70 / 1 ,. v � U!M _ OPPR X /po To /Sv 5,F OOF r l 1 ?gOr,SEQ of F; QAR�ESf;�� ,Po{iertvcMmr f9ssrx. Tni�nR'Fr�` VAS✓ r or /POF0M,44 ,'Y.,A! a f�9�99 C AR7F-RF-T C-0• sp ►,;L7 13P\D6t BRoo'K Lt�JE. :s L r I �� P.O. Box 20400 204 E. Shefford St. PO M O NA Greensboro, NC 27420 Greer, SC 29650 PIPE Tel: 336-292-8060 Tel: 864-244-6451 PRODUCTS Fax: 336-292-2251 Fax: 864-268-5776 Pomona Supply Company 9•-3 _ u, vt v YIN O ?— ( i z O O �L r0 � d ; I � 0 i 0 r � � ►x = Um m o. 10 Ri r 9 �. � C •. -o U' cJ o N �T t 7C Contech Distributor Fireplace Systems �"� Logan Vitrified Clay Pipe`,; Aluminum Drainage Products l Flue Liner & Firebrick y,n ��{� Hobas Fiberglass Pipe r, Steel Drainage Products Plugs, Couplings, Adapters"�!'z Metromont Manholes Plastic Pipe Products Air Vac/Test Equipment - ��, IPA Rehab Materials Water Detention Systems/ Metal Fabrication G `�r ADJACENT RIPARIAN LANDOWNERS STATEMENT Carteret County: Replace Bridge No. 111 One of the requirements for applicants who propose to undertake (development) activities in an Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) is that landowners of waterfront properties adjacent to the proposal be given notice of the proposed action(s) and an opportunity to comment. The Department of Transportation is proposing to replace the aging bridge over Jumping Run Branch (Carteret County) SR 1727 Bridge No. 111. This form allows the adjacent riparian landowner to express either: (1) that he/she objects to the project; or, (2) that he/she does not object. Of course, the adjacent riparian landowner need not sign this form at all if he/she chooses. No response will be construed to mean the adjacent riparian landowner has no objections. The Barnesfield Property Owners Association, Inc., is an adjacent riparian landowner and is aware of the North Carolina Department of Transportation's plan to replace Bridge No. 111 on SR1727 as described. It is further aware that this work will occur in one or more AEC's 1727 and therefore will require authorization from the Division of Coastal Management in accordance with the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA). The Association has no objection to the project as presently proposed. Signature of Adjacent Riparian Landowner Association President Date: 2 - 2 7- 9 S H.F. van der Voort PO Box 1615 Morehead City, NC 28557 252-726-9045 ADJACENT RIPARIAN LANDOWNERS STATEMENT Carteret County: Replace Bridge No. 111 One of the requirements for applicants who propose to undertake (development) activities in an Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) is that landowners of waterfront properties adjacent to the proposal be given notice of the proposed action(s) and an opportunity to comment. The Department of Transportation is proposing to replace the aging bridge over Jumping Run Branch (Carteret County) SR 1727 Bridge No. 111. This form allows the adjacent riparian landowner to express either: (1) that he/she objects to the project; or, (2) that he/she does not object. Of course, the adjacent riparian landowner need not sign this form at all if he/she chooses. No response will be construed to mean the adjacent riparian landowner has no objections. 1, SFero 1. RhCkIZtl - , am an adjacent riparian landowner and am aware of the North Carolina Department of Transportation's plan to replace Bridge No. 111 on SR1727 as described. I am further aware that this work will occur in one or more AEC's 1727 and therefore will require authorization from the Division of Coastal Management in accordance with the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA). kJX I have no objection to the project as presently proposed. I have objections to the project as pleasantly proposed and my comments are attached. Signature of Adjacent Riparian Landowner Date: 3 ►2G4L nAotz rE u �®� CITY � �.iC 2S � 5 7 ADJACENT RIPARIAN LANDOWNER STATEMENT AK CF eF "ounty: Replace Bridge No. I I ( One of the requirements for applicants who propose to undertake (development) activities in an Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) is that landowners of waterfront properties adjacent to the proposal be given notice of the proposed action(s) and an opportunity to comment. The Department of Transportation is proposing to replace the aging bridge over �,r,\PIrnl(, RLW 8RAnlcN (GAR rc-eF -Go.) SK 17, �?'J 44RG•#///. This form allows the adjacent riparian landowner to express either: (1) that he/she objects to the project; or, (2) that he/she does not object. Of course, the adjacent riparian landowner need not sign this form at all if he/she so chooses. No response will be construed to mean the adjacent riparian landowner has no objections. 0 AeLe" x) 15i , am an adjacent riparian property owner and am aware of the North Carolina Department of Transportation's plans to replace Bridge No. 12 on SR 1108 as described. I am further aware that this work will occur in one or more AEC's and therefore will require authorization from the Division of Coastal Management in accordance with the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA). I have no objection to the project as presently proposed. I have objections to the project as presently proposed and my comments are attached i 4ignLature of Adjacent Riparian Landowner Date: 13(ot NtrnNw &y 24- KXWPoRs, SIC 28 57c �2�• 3�t o ADJACENT RIPARIAN LANDOWNER STATEMENT County: Replace Bridge No. 6AR-ree-e-r / t / One of the requirements for applicants who propose to undertake (development) activities in an Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) is that landowners of waterfront properties adjacent to the proposal be given notice of the proposed action(s) and an opportunity to comment. The Department of Transportation is proposing to replace the aging bridge over -3'urvmP;ny Run,/ -SR19,V4k1(4�19oer,e2Fr Co-) S;P/7a7 B,'ee-Al /// This form allows the adjacent riparian landowner to express either: (1) that he/she objects to the project; or, (2) that he/she does not object. Of course, the adjacent riparian landowner need not sign this form at all if he/she so chooses. No response will be construed to mean the adjacent riparian landowner has no objections. I,��,02� /j�am an adjacent riparian property owner and am aware of the North Carolina Department of Transportation's plans to replace Bridge No. i1 won SR t-t6 as described. I am further aware that this work will occur in one or more AEC's7ard therefore will require authorization from the Division of Coastal Management in accordance with the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA). . - I have no objection to the project as presently proposed. have objections to the project as presently proposed and my comments are attached ignature of Adjacent Riparian Landowner Date: a • 9, o - 9 9 ,3d 5 �Zcc14 LA0` IV E w V�o 4'r , sic 2 S 4S T O 7Z6- -22 33 4a� l . c r 6�(:& � `rye ,c.s �eJ�e 4o b0�45 C� �� ., 4&-O� Author: Preston Pate at NRDMF0IP Date: 2/3/99 3:12 PM Priority: Normal TO: Tere Barrett at NROBA03P Subject: Re[3]: lots of things -------------------------------- Message Contents --------------------------------- I am positive that the dredging above the bridge was done because I watched most of it. Swan point dredging in Swansboro did the work. It was done after I bought my lot but before we moved. I also clearly remember that we had an understanding with the Barnesfield folks that we would stay away from the bridge a safe distance. They were concerned about undermining the pilings. After the dredging was done, David and I removed by hand some old pilings directly under the bridge and stood in the water while doing so. P3. Reply Separator Subject: Re[2]: lots of things Author: Tere Barrett at NROBA03P Date: 2/3/99 2:06 PM Pres, I just got a message from David Waller that he had checked his permit and it was to REMOVE 3' of material from BOTH SIDES of the bridge. He said depending on the amount of water he had going in, which he didn't know, the finished depth might have been >4'. Who knows. I wonder if he may never have done the work, even though he had a permit, cause everyone else seems to think that it has never been dredged under or above the bridge. Just thought I'd tell ya. T