56368_NC DOT_20110218

VCAMA / `' (DRIUDGE & FILL N- 56368
PXNERAL PERMIT Previous permit #
YNNew DModification )Complete Reissue DPartial Reissue Date previous permit issued
As authorized by the State of North Carolina, Department of Environment and Natural Resources O —.g u - t i oo "1-3,01) 3, 0 C,
and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant to I SA NCAC / ! 1
p ules attached.
3r xw a t 1 fi N� W"xr„ QAK
s47 l i
%ht�t��Calilf� tP� . kM x_�r.. 1 Protect Location: County'
Street Address/ State Road/ Lot #(s) iff + ��
Subdivision
city ��e�r a iV ZIP�3�
i:xn�e'.�'.`.� "tii4'*..d.%:.,.,L .a< >',.,Rt'.R'.:S:.wry?'si�'i.v,wss.:.rYr.:.r>•.•a�.v ,eu:,u3n:...w,.,,.a:,,a >+�.ua «i .ns. ..v. -rte
LCW 9fW META TS OPTS Phone # (_) River Basin
Affected -OEA �HHF IH UBA DWA �u S a .di- f
AEC(s): Adj. Wtr. Body y (nat AQ unkn)
PWS: DFC.
ORW. yes /9 PNA yes/ no Crit.gH��ab. yes / no Closest Mal. Wtr. Body
j Type of Project) Act
y\� `r aAc as S p �i Jy6""" �, ,°. � az v ;"��► sL ..�. ^;! �� ` 10`1
and��•�asG<:. e �j¢?�✓ � �.����®eoe.I �^ u;E��� i:aq�,: (Stale: 0!!/d^r
Pier (dock) length --
Finger pier(s)---...-
Groin length ---------- --- - —-------__— --- -----_-__.. -- -- - ---
number -
Bulkhead/ Riprap length •- -- --_-------_` -- - — _-_____.__—_____ ='
ayg distance offshore
max distance offshore
Basin, channel
Y �
- a
yrs
cubic yards - {�' �-- 71C -a-1--•----------
Boat ramp - ---- -- -- ---- ---------- -- _.—,
Boathouse/ Boadift
Beach Bulldozing - ----- - — - ---- _ - - --- ---- - - -- ---
Other 145'' f
A • 1.
-- IVFOI't�I\2.Vijiol jt�,r 1({t.)e- 01,,VAJ j-.2<-CIVe.-% Cii - •, I i
A building permit may be required by:y, mac. C.,�`{{f
Notes) Special Conditions l f he arc: aJ ^i:fi n, dC P'
refv%�'�a "rte ,rw'.-
' I eJ • I CX t i ff
See note on back regarding River Basin rules.
c.rY re -111C A'g��--
L.B.
�,-�` ..day ��a'f- �ub/ -t�`e '!`es+.«� ino'iii.�►� Y��.+ �11,_V�e>. vJOr� /✓" ..//a:.✓t%�( FzA--rY l.r

T TONS
END @ APP. SLAB
SHOULDERIBERM GUTTER 13ST DRIVEWAY
+7726
BEG
ASSM0C;,5k.TED—L— STA 2 +81;43
RAC
SEPTIC SYS'TEM
21.93' LT
q.
kWOVE OCIST. END APPROACH SLAB
pibc std" 50.00 1.9 BEGIN BRIE
10'SOIL —L— STA 23+22.50
DRIVEWAY
OVE
i TO
Stc
2 STRUCTURE PAY ITEM
LATERAL 'V` DIT
SEE DETAIL A Yn
)RIVAL CROWN
ALL OF., BUFFER
MITE
')�AN W. O'NEAL MIL ROAD
P8 106 PG 464
2 9

Lane, Stephen
From: Rivenbark, Chris
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 7:53 AM
To: Lane, Stephen
Cc: Fontaine, Lance P. Ph.D.
Subject: RE: B-4551 Hyde County
Attachments: B4551_hyd_drn.pdf
Stephen, this is the one I emailed about last week. A driveway has been added just off of
the eastern end of the bridge in the northeast quadrant. In addition, the guardrail on this
quadrant is proposed to be eliminated as well as inlet 7. We have a property owner in the
southwest quadrant who does not want us to discharge water in the ditch on the SW side (left
side of pdf) of the bridge so the pipe system has been revised. The pipe system on the east
side of the bridge has also been revised due to the removal of inlet 7. Impacts will not
change as a result of this revisions.
We are requesting that the CAMA General Permit be revised as necessary. Please let me know if
you need any additional information.
Chris Rivenbark
PDEA Natural Environment Unit
N.C. Department of Transportation
[phone] office
-----Original Message -----
From: Lane, Stephen
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 3:51 PM
To: Rivenbark, Chris
Subject: RE: B-4551 Hyde County
Hi Chris,
DCM's 30' coastal shoreline buffer does not include any stormwater treatment requirements, it
is intended to limit development within the buffered area. As far as modifying the permit,
just send me an email requesting that the permit be modified and scan in a clean copy of the
plans and I will modify the face of the GP, scan it, and send the modified permit back to
you.
Stephen
-----Original Message -----
From: Rivenbark, Chris
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 10:21 AM
To: Lane, Stephen
Subject: B-4551 Hyde County
Stephen,
Due to a driveway shift, there apparently will be a slight design change (see attachment) for
this one but it doesn't appear that impacts will change. Hydraulics asked me if water
entering the CAMA buffer needed to be treated. I was thinking the answer was no but wanted
to confirm just to make sure.
Additionally, will this driveway shift need to be approved via a Letter of refinement?
1

Thank you.
Chris Rivenbark Eastern Regional Manager I Project Management Group PDEA I Natural
Environment Unit N.C. Department of Transportation
[phone] office ( [phone] fax I crivenbark(@ncdot.gov
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and
may be disclosed to third parties.
2

❑CAMA / ❑ DREDGE & FILL i
GENERAL PERMIT ."Previous permit #
❑New ❑Modification ❑Complete Reissue El Partial Reissue Date previous permit issued
As authorized by the State of North Carolina, Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant to ISA NCAC
f ❑ Rules attached.
Applicant Name_' P t L t C
Address
City
Phone # O_
Authorized Agent
Affected ❑ CW
AEC(s): ❑ OEA
❑ PWS
ORW: yes/ no
State ZIP
Fax # (_ _ )
❑ EW ❑ PTA ❑ ES ❑ PTS
❑ HHF ❑ IH ❑ UBA ❑ N/A
❑ FC:
PNA yes / no Crit.Hab. yes / no
Type of Project/ Activity
Pier (dock) length
Platform(s)
Finger pier(s)
Groin length
number
Bulkhead/ Riprap length -
avg distance offshore
max distance offshore
Basin, channel
cubic yards
Boat ramp
Boathouse/ Boatlift
Beach Bulldozing
Other
Shoreline Length
i
SAV: not sure yes
no
Sandbags: not sure yes
no
Moratorium: n/a yes
no
Photos: yes
no
Waiver Attached: yes
no
A building permit may be required by:
Notes/ Special Conditions
Agent or Applicant Printed Name
Signature ** Please read compliance statement on back of permit
Application Fee(s)
roiec oca ion. ounty
Street Address/ State Road/ Lot #(s)
y
Subdivision
City ZIP
Phone # O River Basin
Adj. Wtr. Body (nat /man /unkn)
Closest Maj. Wtr. Body
(Scale: )
❑ See note on back regarding River Basin rules.
Permit Officer's Signature
Issuing Date Expiration Date
Check# Local PlanningJurisdiction
Rover File Name

Statement of Compliance and Consistency
This permit is subject to compliance with this application, site drawing and attached general and specific conditions. Any
violation of these terms may subject the permittee to a fine or criminal or civil action; and may cause the permit to become
null and void.
This permit must be on the project site and accessible to the permit officer when the project is inspected for compliance. The
applicant certifies by signing this permit that 1) prior to undertaking any activities authorized by this permit, the applicant will
confer with appropriate local authorities to confirm that this project is consistent with the local land use plan and all local
ordinances, and 2) a written statement or certified mail return receipt has been obtained from the adjacent riparian
landowner(s) .
The State of North Carolina and the Division of Coastal Management, in issuing this permit under the best available
information and belief, certify that this project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal Management Program.
River Basin Rules Applicable To Your Project:
❑ Tar- Pamlico River Basin Buffer Rules ❑ Other:
❑ Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules
If indicated on front of permit, your project is subject to the Environmental Management Commission's Buffer Rules for the
River Basin checked above due to its location within that River Basin. These buffer rules are enforced by the NC Division of
Water Quality. Contact the Division of Water Quality at the Washington Regional Office (252-946-6481) or the Wilmington
Regional Office (910-796-7215) for more information on how to complywith these buffer rules.
Division of Coastal Management Offices
Raleigh Office
Mailing Address:
1638 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638
Location:
2728 Capital Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
919-733-2293
Fax:[phone]
Morehead City Headquarters
400 Commerce Ave
Morehead City, NC 28557
252-808-2808/ 1-888-4RCOAST
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Carteret, Craven, Onslow -above
New River Inlet- and Pamlico Counties)
Elizabeth City District
1367 U.S. 17 South
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
252-264-3901
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Camden, Chowan, Currituck,
Dare, Gates, Pasquotank and Perquimans
Counties)
Washington District
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
252-946-6481
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Beaufort, Bertie, Hertford, Hyde,
Tyrrell and Washington Counties)
Wilmington District
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
910-796-7215
Fax:[phone]
(Serves: Brunswick, New Hanover,
Onslow -below New River Inlet- and
Pender Counties)
Revised 08/09/06

M CAMA / MIDREII & FILL ly 56368
GENERAL PERMIT' Previous permit#
New ❑Modification ❑Complete Reissue ❑Partial Reissue Date previous permit issued
As authorized by the State of North Carolina, Department of Environment and Natural Resources 0 C'
and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant to 15A NCAC i ��
IUles attached.
Applicant Name ` Project Location: County i Y
Address �-� a 1`'���� e'�� Street Address/ State Road/ Lot #(s)
City t �r-'�i N �- State �`!� C ZIP D'"7 `'� `I - S `I J �I S� Z b 44
Phone # '7 D'7 - 6 o oc' Fax # ( _) Subdivision
Authorized Agent City — 't�' / �� ZIP -1-7 J?a'
Affected ❑ CW �W �TA QHS ElPTS Phone # ( ) River Basin Ti
AEC(s): ❑ OEA ❑ HHF ❑ IH ❑ UBA ❑ N/A Adj. Wtr. Body ` `�` j' `� `� ' �nat an, unkn)
❑ PWS: ❑FC: �+ r
ORW: yes / no>-� PNA yes /Co) Crit.Hab. yes / no
Closest Maj. Wtr. Body
C
Type of Project/ Activity ^� i "ti .. Z��l�'
�.
x c%
d�
�'' ti ,1 r(£� � 16Z .fz k o tnf+��'� �vA� c -t :� v./f:•'tc )' .,�� .i, (Scale: 1V'/ )
Pier (dock) length
Platform(s)
Finger pier(s)
Groin length
number
Bulkhead/ Riprap length_
avg distance offshore
max distance offshore
Basin, channel —
cubic yards —
Boat ramp
Boathouse/ Boatlift
Beach Bulldozing
Other
MEN
NOWIN
ME )MINES
NONE 0 002
1% - N In
0 ME EMMOMMIN NONE MEN= IN ONE
ME 11Emommm N mommopommmm MEN
�mmmmllim%mm M MEN E ONE
Fmmmmmmm=mmm�m�EMEN RENNIE=
mmimmom�mmom M -0 OMMOMME
MMI0 mommsom I ONE E N NONE
MMMMIMIMMMMMMM ME
milmo m����mm�oom
A buildin permit may be required by:
Notes/ Special Conditions
❑ See note on back regarding
}JRiver
/ Basin rules.
q L.h rzj1C 1'inJJ/ J1'L•: f/ �t-
n t-
Agent or Applicant Printed Name Permit0 Signat� N o X f, /,r„4Jc :k
.eU4f-kun! fc jijii"4t.7
Sign toe SPI ere dcPmpli ces tementonbackofpermit" Issuing Date Expiration Date
j{ o '. i +% Ar'u.Y.�r 7Ys`#' 3. 7 t f+ 1
mor i,P �„i JrHY X 0 i C) 7
Application Fee(s) Check # Local Planning Jurisdiction Rover File Name
� S-
Shoreline Length
SAV: not sure
yes
no
Sandbags: not sure
yes
9
Moratorium: n/a
yes
no
Photos:
ye
no
a
139
MEN
NOWIN
ME )MINES
NONE 0 002
1% - N In
0 ME EMMOMMIN NONE MEN= IN ONE
ME 11Emommm N mommopommmm MEN
�mmmmllim%mm M MEN E ONE
Fmmmmmmm=mmm�m�EMEN RENNIE=
mmimmom�mmom M -0 OMMOMME
MMI0 mommsom I ONE E N NONE
MMMMIMIMMMMMMM ME
milmo m����mm�oom
A buildin permit may be required by:
Notes/ Special Conditions
❑ See note on back regarding
}JRiver
/ Basin rules.
q L.h rzj1C 1'inJJ/ J1'L•: f/ �t-
n t-
Agent or Applicant Printed Name Permit0 Signat� N o X f, /,r„4Jc :k
.eU4f-kun! fc jijii"4t.7
Sign toe SPI ere dcPmpli ces tementonbackofpermit" Issuing Date Expiration Date
j{ o '. i +% Ar'u.Y.�r 7Ys`#' 3. 7 t f+ 1
mor i,P �„i JrHY X 0 i C) 7
Application Fee(s) Check # Local Planning Jurisdiction Rover File Name

A�)
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor James H. Gregson, Director Dee Freeman, Secretary
February 21, 2011
Jay Johnson, NC DOT
Division of Environmental Officer
Division 3
PO Box 1587
Greenville, NC 27835
Dear Mr. Johnson:
In order to validate this permit, please sign the permit as indicated. Retain the white copy for
your files and return the signed yellow and pink copies to us in the enclosed, self-addressed
envelope. If the signed permit copies are not returned to this office before the initiation of
development, you will be working without authorization and will be subject. to a Notice of
Violation and subsequent civil penalties.
We appreciate your early attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
12
Stephen f,ane i
Coastal Management Representative
lsb
Enclosures
400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer —50% Recycled \ 10% Post Consumer Paper

Haplicant:
,'�;►
Date:
Describe below the HABITAT disturbances for the application. All values should match the name, and units of measurement
found in your Habitat code sheet.
Habitat NameChoose
DISTURB TYPE
One
TOTAL Sq. Ft.
(Applied for.
Disturbance total
includes any
anticipated
restoration or
ternp impacts)
FINAL Sq. Ft.
(Anticipated final
disturbance.
Excludes any
restoration
and/or temp
impact amount)
TOTAL Feet
(Applied for.
Disturbance
total includes
any anticipated
restoration or
ternp impacts)
FINAL Feet
(Anticipated final
disturbance.
Excludes any
restoration and/or
temp impact
amount
C Wu
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other [Y
/
�j
Dredge E' Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
�r 1
{S
Dredge [IFill Both ElOther ElI
% 3 0
S 3
Dredge ❑ Fill E- Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Z �r? A 1. , a -+ P. A---4, t^.) tl.,. Ali lfs
,. �-�.��, , 'ut3:��i .. :,r•.arar.r:cc_-�., .a..-,..., . . : i, ..n:

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE
GovERNOR
Mr. Garcy Ward
N.C. Division of Water Quality
Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889-3532
Dear Sirs:
December 16, 2010
010? 9 v
EUGENE A. CONTI, JR.
SECRETARY
Mr. Stephen Lane
N. C. Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave.
Morehead City, NC 28557
Subject: Application for a CAMA General Permit and Tar -Pamlico Riparian Buffer
Authorization for the replacement of Bridge No. 45 over Outfall Canal on US 264 in
Hyde County. State Project No. 8.1081001; Federal Aid Project Number BRSTP-
0264(23); Debit $400.00 from WBS 33764.1.1; TIP No. B-4551.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), Division of Highways, in
consultation with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), proposes to replace Bridge No.
45 in Hyde County. The proposed let date for the project is October 18, 2011 with a review date
of August 18, 2011; however, the let date may advance as additional funds become available.
Please find enclosed a Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) form, permit drawings, buffer
drawings, utility drawings and narrative, roadway plans, a copy of the State Stormwater Permit
Exclusion, EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter, North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
Major Permit Forms 1 and 5, and adjacent riparian landowner return receipts for the above
referenced project. A Categorical Exclusion (CE) was completed for this project on December
16, 2008, and distributed shortly thereafter. Additional copies are available upon request.
Regulatory Approvals
Section 404 Permit: There are no impacts to waters of the U.S..
Section 401 Permit: There are no impacts to waters of the U.S..
LAMA: NCDOT requests
Management Act General
application. Authorization
33764.1.1 is hereby given.
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1598
L_ -
that the proposed work be authorized under a Coastal Area
Permit. The landowner receipts are provided with this permit
to debit the $400 Permit Application Fee from WBS Element
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG
LOCATION:
4701 ATLANTICAVENUE
SUITE 116
RALEIGH NC 27604

Tar -Pamlico River Basin Buffer Authorization: NCDOT requests that the NC Division of Water
Quality review this application and issue a written approval for a Tar -Pamlico Riparian Buffer
Authorization. A copy of this application has been sent to the regional office.
A copy of this permit application will be posted on the NCDOT website at:
htt-o://www.ncdot.org/doh/i)reconstruct/ye/neu/pennit.html
If you have any questions or need additional information, please call or email Dr. Lance P.
Fontaine at 919-431-6667 or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
�- i" /-V�
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D. Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
W/attachment
Mr. Brian Wrenn, NCDWQ (4 Copies)
W/o attachment (see website for attachments)
Mr. Biddlecome, USACE, Washington
Mr. Scott McLendon, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Ms. Anne Deaton, NCDMF
Dr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. Victor Barbour, P.E., Project Services Unit
Mr. Jerry Jennings, P.E., Division 1 Engineer
Mr. Clay Willis, Division 1 Environmental Officer
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Majed Alghandour, P. E., Programming and TIP
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Ms. Beth Harmon, EEP
Mr. Phillip Ayscue, NCDOT External Audit Branch
Ms. Christy M. Huff, P.E., Project Planning Engineer
N

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
Project: 33764.1.1
TIP No. B-4551
Hyde County
06/11/2009
Hydraulics Project Manager: Roger Weadon, P.E. (MA Engineering),
Marshal Clawson, P.E. (NCDOT Hydraulics Unit)
ROADWAY DESCRIPTION
The project B-4551 consists of replacing the Bridge No.45 on US -264 over an outfall
canal for Lake Mattamuskeet with a 3 -span (2@40', 1@45', total length 125') 21" cored
slab bridge in Hyde County, North Carolina. The total project length is 0.214 miles. The
project creates impacts to the outfall canal, which is in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin. The
project drainage systems consist of storm drainage grate inlet, pipes, driveway pipes,
roadside ditches, and drainage swales.
Jurisdiction Stream: Outfall Canal for Lake Mattamuskeet
ENVIRONMENTAL DESCRIPTION
The project is located within the Tar Pamlico River Basin in Hyde County. Since the
body of water is an outfall canal it classified as "SC" by the North Carolina Department
of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) — Division of Water Quality. The Canal
and the stream buffers will be impact by the proposed project. The outfall canal does
have stream buffer requirements although much what could be classified as buffer area is
already occupied by existing roads and driveways.
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND MAJOR STRUCTURES
The primary goal of Best Management Practices (BMPs) is to prevent degradation of the
states surface waters by the location, construction and operation of the highway system.
The BMPs are activities, practices and procedures taken to prevent or reduce stormwater
pollution. The BMP measures used on this project to reduce stormwater impacts are:
• Grassed Swale - 425 feet in length
• Rip rap pads at pipe outlets.
• No bridge deck drains over canal

o stem
E
C1 le
PROGRAM
November 4, 2009
Mr. Brian Wrenn
N. C. Division of Water Quality
Mail Service Center 1650
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Dear Mr. Wrenn:
Subject: EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
B-4551, Replace Bridge Number 45 over a canal on US 264, Hyde County; Tar -Pamlico River Basin
(Cataloging Unit 03020105); Northern Outer Coastal Plain (NOCP) Eco -Region
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) will provide the
buffer mitigation for the unavoidable impact associated with the above referenced project. Based on the information
supplied by the NCDOT on November 3, 2009, the impacts are located in CU 03020105 of the Tar -Pamlico River
Basin in the Northern Outer Coastal Plain (NOCP) Eco -Region, and the anticipated mitigation credits needed to
offset the impacts are as follows:
Tar -Pamlico
03020105
NOCP
Stream
Wetlands
Buffer (Sq. Ft.)
Cold
ooP�ian
Cl
Warm
R'
Non-
Ri arian
Coastal
Marsh
Zone 1
Zone
2
Impacts (feet/acres)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
158
Mitigation Units
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
237
The NCDOT will be responsible to ensure that the appropriate compensation for the buffer mitigation will
be provided in the agreed upon method of fund transfer. Upon receipt of the NCDWQ's Buffer Authorization
Certification, EEP will transfer funds from Fund 2984 (Tri -Party MOA Account) into Fund 2982 and commit to
provide the appropriate buffer mitigation to offset the impacts associated with this project. If the buffer impacts or
the amount of mitigation required from EEP increases or decreases for this project, then this mitigation acceptance
letter will no longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be required. All buffer mitigation requests
and approvals are administrated through the Riparian Restoration Buffer Fund (Fund 2982).
1929.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth Harmon at 919-715-
Sincerely,
Willia D Gilmore, P.E.
EEP Director
cc: Mr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., NCDOT-PDEA
Mr. Bill Biddlecome, USACE — Washington Regulatory Field Office
File: B-4551
Prot" Oar Stat
T
CCDENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 1919-715-0476 1 www.neeep.net

0
�0� W AT �9QG
_
O T
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
❑ Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the N WP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑ No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
® Yes
❑ No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
® Yes
❑ No
1h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
®Yes
❑ No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Replacement of Bridge 45 over Outfall Canal on US 264
2b.
County:
Hyde
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
New Holland
2d.
Subdivision name:
not applicable
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
B-4551
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
not applicable
3c. Responsible Parry (for LLC i f
applicable):
not applicable
3d.
Street.address:
1598 Mail Service Center
3e.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
3f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
3g.
Fax no.:
[phone]
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
not applicable
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
not applicable
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
not applicable
Latitude: 35.443343 Longitude: - 76.169758
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
0.26 acre
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Outfall Canal
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
SC
2c. River basin:
Tar Pamlico
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Existing conditions on the site include maintained/disturbed, agricultural/cultivated land, and some woodland adjacent to
Albemarle Canal. General land use is residential with very low-density detached dwelling and cropland and pasture.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Outfall Canal - 460 feet along Y -line
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To replace a structurally deficient bridge.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project involves replacing a 104 -foot bridge with a 125 -foot, 3 -span bridge on the existing alignment with an on-site
detour. Standard road & bridge building equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used. Telephone utilities
will be relocated on-site via the directional bore method. Tideland EMC (power utility) will remove aerials proximate to the
proposed construction and will reroute their aerials to the north and south farther away from the bridge. Embarq
(telephone utility) will remove aerials and will bore facility under canal (north of bridge). Hyde County Water will relocate
water line via trenchless method under canal. Bridge will be replaced on existing location with a bridge using phased
construction. Two-way traffic will be maintained using signals during construction in phases. During phase 1, traffic will be
maintained on south half of existing bridge, and reversed to north on new half of bridge during phase 2. No temporary
bridge structure will be utilized.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ preliminary ® Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Ecoscience Corp.
Name (if known):
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Action ID - 200511637 - February 16, 2006 site visit and verification
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for�E]s
®No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
Site 1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
Site 2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
Site 3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
Site 4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
Site 5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
Site 6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0 Permanent
0 Temporary
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of
Average
Impact length
number -
(PER) or
jurisdiction
stream
(linear feet)
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
(Corps - 404, 10
width
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
DWQ — non -404,
(feet)
other)
❑ PER
❑ Corps
Site 1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
❑ PER
❑ Corps
Site 2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
❑ PER
❑ Corps
Site 3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
❑ PER
❑ Corps
Site 4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
❑ PER
❑ Corps
Site 5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ INT
❑DWQ
❑ PER
❑ Corps
Site 6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
0 Perm
0 Temp
3i. Comments: Impacts due to the proposed bents is 30 square feet (< 0.01 ac).

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of
impact number —
waterbody
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
(if applicable)
Temporary T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
0 Permanent
0 Temporary
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Pond ID
Proposed use or
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
number
purpose of pond
(acres)
Excavat
Flooded
Filled
ed
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer
impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ®Tar -Pamlico ❑Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason for impact
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary
required?
B1 ®P ❑ T
Bridge
Outfall Canal
®Nps
3,137
9
B2 ®P ❑ T
Roadway Fill
Outfall Canal
® Nos
1,204
797
B3 ®P ❑ T
Roadway Fill
Outfall Canal
®❑ Nos
0
158
6h. Total buffer impacts
4,341
964
6i. Comments: B1 captures impacts directly associated with the bridge. B2 captures impacts due to road crossing/roadway
fill that are associated with the Y -lines along SR 1330 and SR 1164; B3 captures impacts associated with replacing the
driveway in SE quad.

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The proposed bridge is 21 feet longer than the existing bridge. The proposed bridge will be at approximately the
same grade as the existing structure. The existing road facility for SR 1164 from approximately Sta. -Y- 11+00 to -
Y- 13+40.00 will be removed, graded to drain towards canal and re -seeded with grass. This will produce a
vegetated BZ -2 where it is currently compact gravel. The majority of drainage from SW quadrant of project area will
be collected in grassy swale and directed away from stream. The existing road facility for SR 1330 from
approximately Sta. -Y1- 14+02 to -Y1- 15+66 will be removed, graded to drain towards canal and re -seeded with
grass. The driveway in SE quad is being moved out of BZ 1 --old footprint will be seeded with grass. 3:1 fill slopes
where practicable.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Sedimentation and erosion control measures; Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds; top-down construction;
adherence to in -water work moratorium of February 15 to June 15; phased construction utilized to avoid
construction of temporary bridge structure or in -water causeway. Power utility will reduce the number of aerial poles
in buffer zone; telephone utility will remove aerials from buffer zone and will directional bore their facility under the
stream; staging area for telephone utility will be outside buffer zone. The 4" water line will be relocated during
construction via trenchless method under the canal thereby not interfering with Outfall Canal. A "phased" on-site
detour will be used.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S, or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
If no, explain: There are no impacts to Waters of the U.S. or
to Waters of the State.
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigat ion option will be used for this
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
® Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
0 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
237 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4h. Comments: Buffer mitigation in BZ -2 as a result of driveway re -alignment.

5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
® Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
N/A
0
3 (2 for Catawba)
0
Zone 2
Roadway Fill
158
1.5
237
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
237
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
NC EEP will provide buffer mitigation.
6h. Comments: Unavoidable impacts due to moving driveway out of BZ1 into BZ2 in SE quad.

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: See attached permit drawings.
® Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
N/A
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
See attached permit drawings and stormwater management plan.
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
® DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
not applicable
❑ Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply):
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
® Coastal counties
❑ HQW
(check all that apply):
❑ ORW
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ® No -In Process
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No N/A
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No N/A
III

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
® Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
® Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
® No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby
land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
not applicable
11

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, ind icate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NCNHP, USFWS, field surveys
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
® Yes ❑ No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NMFS County Index; EFH Assessment sent to NMFS on September 17, 2009.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NEPA Documentation
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics coordination with FEMA
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps
o J. Tho e Ph D
Dr. Grery rp
E
(Z l 5 i
Date
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
plic t/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
12

�-,Vek, �
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. 200511637 County: Hyde U.S.G.S. Quad: New Holland
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner/Agent: ATTN: Gregory J. Thorne, NCDOT PDEA
Address: NCDOT PDEA
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Telephone No.: [phone]
RECEIVED
FEB 28 2006
Property description:
Size (acres) 5_0 Nearest Town New Holland WISH OF HIGHI'�AYS
Nearest Waterway Outfall Canal River Basin Tar/Pamlico PDFA-OFFICE OF NATURAL ENNONM1
USGS HUC 03020105 Coordinates N 35.4432757 W -76.16972
Location description A 5.0 acre aroiect area with wetlands (3.0 acres) adjacent to Outfall Canal which is part of the
Tar/Pamlico River Basin, located on US 264 Highway, bridge #45 in New Holland Hyde County North Carolina
TIP B-4551
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
_ Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X There are wetlands on the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination
may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
X The wetland on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps. We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps.
Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property
which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years.
_ The wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps
Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
Page l of 2

_ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Washington, NC, at [phone] to determine
their requirements.
Action ID: 200511637
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Bill Biddlecome at [phone] ex 26.
C. Basis For Determination
This site exhibits wetland criteria as described in the 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual and is adjacent to
Outfall Canal which is a tributary to the Pamlico Sound.
D. Remarks
E. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the South Atlantic Division, Division Office at the Following
address:
Mr. Michael F. Bell, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD-ET-CO-R
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 04/18/2006.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence." _
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date 02/16/2006 Expiration Date 02/16/2011
Copy furnished:
Page 2 of 2

JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION Revised 8/13/04
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
DISTRICT OFFICE: CESAW-RG-W
FILE NUMBER: 200511637
PROJECT LOCATION INFORMATION:
State: North Carolina
County: Hyde
Center coordinates of site (latitude/longitude): N 35.4432757/ W-76.169726
Approximate size of area (parcel) reviewed, including uplands: 5.0 acres.
Name of nearest waterway: Outfall Canal
Name of watershed: Tar/Pamlico River Basin
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Completed: Desktop determination D Date:
Site visit(s) j Date(s): 02/16/2006
Jurisdictional Determination (JD):
ED Preliminary JD - Based on available information, ❑ there appear to be (or) ❑ there appear to be no "waters of the United States"
and/or "navigable waters of the United States" on the project site. A preliminary JD is not appealable (Reference 33 CFR part
331).
Approved JD — An approved JD is an appealable action (Reference 33 CFR part 331).
Check all that apply:
There are "navigable waters of the United States" (as defined by 33 CFR part 329 and associated guidance) within the reviewed
area. Approximate size of jurisdictional area:
ED There are "waters of the United States" (as defined by 33 CFR part 328 and associated guidance) within the reviewed area.
Approximate size of jurisdictional area: 3.0 acres.
El There are "isolated, non -navigable, intra -state waters or wetlands" within the reviewed area.
Decision supported by SWANCC/Migratory Bird Rule Information Sheet for Determination of No Jurisdiction.
BASIS OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION:
A. Waters defined under 33 CFR part 329 as "navigable waters of the United States":
ED The presence of waters that are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide and/or are presently used, or have been used in
the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
B. Waters defined under 33 CFR part 328.3(a) as "waters of the United States":
[� (1) The presence of waters, which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible to use in
interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
(2) The presence of interstate waters including interstate wetlands.
nt: (3) The presence of other waters such as intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats,
wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds, the use, degradation or destruction of which could
affect interstate commerce including any such waters (check all that apply):
❑ (i) which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ (ii) from which fish or shellfish are or could betaken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ (iii) which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
(4) Impoundments of waters otherwise defined as waters of the US.
(5) The presence of a tributary to a water identified in (1) — (4) above.
I (6) The presence of territorial seas.
($ (7) The presence of wetlands adjacent2 to other waters of the US, except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands.
Rationale for the Basis of Jurisdictional Determination (applies to any boxes checked above). If the jurisdictional water or
wetland is not itself a navigable water of the United States, describe connection(s) to the downstream navigable waters. If B(J) or B(3)
is used as the Basis of Jurisdiction, document navigability and/or interstate commerce connection (i.e., discuss site conditions, including
why the waterbody is navigable and/or how the destruction of the waterbody could affect interstate or foreign commerce). If B(2, 4, S or
6) is used as the Basis of Jurisdiction, document the rationale used to make the determination. JfB(7) is used as the Basis of
Jurisdiction, document the rationale used to make adjacency determination: This site exhibits wetland criteria as described in the 1987
Corps Wetland Delineation Manual and is adjacent to Outfall Canal, which is a tributary to the Pamlico Sound.
Page 3 of 2

Lateral Extent of Jurisdiction: (Reference: 33 CFR parts 328 and 329)
❑ Ordinary High Water Mark indicated by: ❑ High Tide Line indicated by:
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank ❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ the presence of litter and debris ❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ changes in the character of soil ❑ physical markings/characteristics
❑ destruction of terrestrial vegetation ❑ tidal gages
❑ shelving ❑ other:
❑ other:
❑ Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ survey to available datum; ❑ physical markings; ❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
® Wetland boundaries, as shown on the attached wetland delineation map and/or in a delineation report prepared by: M. Golden,
Ecoscience Corporation
Basis For Not Asserting Jurisdiction:
The reviewed area consists entirely of uplands.
Unable to confirm the presence of waters in 33 CFR part 328(a)(1, 2, or 4-7).
Headquarters declined to approve jurisdiction on the basis of 33 CFR part 328.3(a)(3).
[j The Corps has made a case -specific determination that the following waters present on the site are not Waters of the United States:
❑ Waste treatment systems, including treatment ponds or lagoons, pursuant to 33 CFR part 328.3.
❑ Artificially irrigated areas, which would revert to upland if the irrigation ceased.
❑ Artificial lakes and ponds created by excavating and/or diking dry land to collect and
retain water and which are used exclusively for such purposes as stock watering, irrigation, settling basins, or rice growing.
❑ Artificial reflecting or swimming pools or other small ornamental bodies of water created
by excavating and/or diking dry land to retain water for primarily aesthetic reasons.
❑ Water -filled depressions created in dry land incidental to construction activity and pits excavated in dry land for the purpose
of obtaining fill, sand, or gravel unless and until the construction or excavation operation is abandoned and the resulting
body of water meets the definition of waters of the United States found at 33 CFR 328.3(a).
❑ Isolated, intrastate wetland with no nexus to interstate commerce.
❑ Prior converted cropland, as determined by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. Explain rationale:
❑ Non -tidal drainage or irrigation ditches excavated on dry land. Explain rationale:
❑ Other (explain):
DATA REVIEWED FOR JURSIDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (mark all that apply):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant.
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant.
® This office concurs with the delineation report; dated 01/06/2006, prepared by (company): Ecoscience Corporation
❑ This office does not concur with the delineation report, dated , prepared by (company):
Data sheets prepared by the Corps.
Q Corps' navigable waters' studies:
Q U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
U.S, Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic maps: New Holland
❑ U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic quadrangles:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic quadrangles:
❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey:
❑, National wetlands inventory maps:
State/Local wetland inventory maps:
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps (Map Name & Date):
100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (NGVD)
❑ Aerial Photographs (Name & Date):
❑ Other photographs (Date):
Advanced Identification Wetland maps:
® Site visit/determination conducted on: 02/16/2006
❑ Applicable/supporting case law:
❑ Other information (please specify):
Wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteria established in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (i.e., occurrence of
hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and wetland hydrology).
'The term "adjacent" means bordering contiguous, or neighboring. Wetlands separated from other waters of the U.S. by man-made dikes or barriers, natural
river berms, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE
GOVERNOR
December 7, 2010
Jean W. O'Neal
23700 US 264
Swan Quarter, NC 27885
Dear Landowner:
b`e.Fa L. 1 ..11
..
DEC: 2 2 'MO
EUGENE A. CONTI, JR.
SECRETARY
The North Carolina Department of Transportation is planning to replace bridge number 45
on US 264 over Outfall Canal. The proposed project will replace the aging existing structure over
the Outfall Canal. The project will replace the existing 104 -foot bridge with a 125 -foot bridge. The
additional length will allow for the replacement of a substandard structure as well as improve the
existing floodplain. This project crosses an Area of Environmental Concern, as defined by the
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (DCM), and must be approved by the DCM under
provisions of the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA). One of the prerequisites to this approval
is that adjacent riparian landowners be given an opportunity to comment on the proposal. A vicinity
map and site drawings are enclosed for your review.
The attached form is submitted to ensure that you have an opportunity to comment on the
proposal. The work planned is depicted in the attached drawing. If you have no objections to the
proposal, please return the form with your response within 10 days to this office. If you do have
objections to the project, please forward your comments to:
Enclosures
cc: Stephen Lane, NCDCM
File B-4551
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1598
Mr. Stephen Lane
N. C. Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave.
Morehead City, NC 28557
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,/.Thorpe,
C. ,
Gregory Ph.D.,
Environmental Management Director, PDEA
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG
LOCATION:
4701 ATLANTICAVENUE
SUITE 116
RALEIGH NC 27604

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE
GOVERNOR
December 7, 2010
Ruth F. Davis
19700 US 264
Swan Quarter, NC 27885
Dear Landowner:
DEC 2 2 2010
EUGENE A. CONTI, JR.
SECRETARY
The North Carolina Department of Transportation is planning to replace bridge number 45
on US 264 over Outfall Canal. The proposed project will replace the aging existing structure over
the Outfall Canal. The project will replace .he existing 104 -foot bridge with a 125 -foot bridge. The
additional length will allow for the replacement of a substandard structure as well as improve the
existing floodplain. This project crosses an Area of Environmental Concern, as defined by the
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (DCM), and must be approved by the DCM under
provisions of the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA). One of the prerequisites to this approval
is that adjacent riparian landowners be given an opportunity to comment on the. proposal. A vicinity
map and site drawings are enclosed for your review.
The attached form is submitted to ensure that you have an opportunity to comment on the
proposal. The work planned is depictod in the attached drawing. If you have no objections to the
proposal, please return the form with your response within 10 days to this office. If you do have
objections to the project, please forward your comments to:
Enclosures
cc: Stephen Lane, NCDCM
File B-4551
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEIPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJEar DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIG6t NC 27699-1598
Mr. Stephen Lane
N. C. Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave.
Morehead City, NC 28557
Thank vnn fnr vnur cnnneratinn
Sin7"Wf
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.,
Environmental Management Director, PDEA
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG
LOCATION:
4701 ATLANTIC AVENUE
SUITE 116
RALEIGH NC 27604

ADJACENT RIPARIAN LANDOWNER STATEMENT
(Hyde County: Replace Bridge No. 45 over Outfall Canal;
NCDOT TIP B-4551)
General Statutes and Division of, Coastal Management General Permit
approval procedures require that riparian landowners with property
adjoining a proposed development in an Area of Environmental Concern
(AEC) be given ten, (10) days in which to comment on the proposed
development. This form allows the adjacent riparian landowner to express
either: (1) that he objects to the project; or, (2) that he does not object and
desires to waive his/her right to the 10 -day period so that the processing of
the application can progress more rapidly. Of course, the adjacent riparian
landowner need not sign this form at all if he/she so chooses.
I, , am an adjacent riparian property owner and
am aware of the North Carolina Department of Transportation's plans for
replacing bridge number 45 over Outfall Canal in Hyde County, North
Carolina. I am further aware that this work will occur in one or more Areas of
Environmental Concern and therefore will require authorization from the
Division of Coastal Management in accordance with the Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA).
I have no objection to the project as presently proposed and
hereby waive that right of objection as provided in General
Statute 113-229
I have objections to the project as presently proposed and my
comments are attached
Signature of Adjacent Riparian Landowner
Phone Number with Area Code
Date
2

e...WFo
Sn
') I
4
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE
GOVERNOR
December 7, 2010
Phillip R. Carawan
PO Box 164
Columbia, NC 27925
Dear Landowner:
EUGENE A. CONTI, JR.
SECRETARY
Y
DEC{ 2 2 2010
lwevw`v..,� ✓ysw
The North Carolina Department of Transportation is planning to replace bridge number 45
on US 264 over Outfall Canal. The proposed project will replace the aging existing structure over
the Outfall Canal. The project will replace the existing 104 -foot bridge with a 125 -foot bridge. The
additional length will allow for the replacement of a substandard structure as well as improve the
existing floodplain. This project crosses an Area of Environmental Concern, as defined by the
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (DCM), and must be approved by the DCM ander
provisions of the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA). One of the prerequisites to this approval
is that adjacent riparian landowners be given an opportunity to comment on the proposal. A vicinity
map and site drawings are enclosed for your review.
The attached form is submitted to ensure that you have an opportunity to comment on the
proposal. The work planned is depicted in the attached drawing. If you have no objections to the
proposal, please return the form with your response within 10 days to this office. If you do have
objections to the project, please forward your comments to:
Mr. Stephen Lane
N. C. Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave.
Morehead City, NC 28557
TLa.aik you for your cooperation.
Sincer y,
�ev Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.,:
Environmental Management Director, PDEA
Enclosures
cc: Stephen Lane, NCDCM
File B-4551
MAILING ADDRESS: 1
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1598
TELEPHONE: 919-431=2000
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE.' WWW.NCDOT.ORG
LOCATION:
4701 ATLANTIC AVENUE
SUITE 116
RALEIGH NC 27604

ADJACENT RIPARIAN LANDOWNER STATEMENT
(Hyde County: Replace Bridge No. 45 over Outfall Canal;
NCDOT TIP B-4551)
General Statutes and Division of Coastal Management General Permit
approval procedures require that riparian landowners with property
adjoining a proposed development in an Area of Environmental Concern
(AEC) be given ten (10) days in which to comment on the proposed
development. This form allows the adjacent riparian landowner to express
either: (1) that he objects to the project; or, (2) that he does not object and
desires to waive his/her right to the 10 -day period so that the processing of
the application can progress more rapidly. Of course, the adjacent riparian
landowner need not sign this form at aii is ; Je slie so chooses.
am an adjacent riparian property owner and
am aware of the North Carolina Department of Transportation's plans for
replacing bridge number 45 over Outfall Canal in Hyde County, North
Carolina. I am"further aware that this work will occur in one or more Areas of
Environmental Concern and therefore will require authorization. from the
Division of Coastal Management in accordance with the Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA).
I have no objection to the project as presently proposed and
rereby waive that right of objection as provided in General
Statute 113-229
I have objections to the project as presently proposed and my
comments are attached
Signature of Adjacent Riparian Landowner Date
Phone Number with Area Code
2

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE
GovERNOR
December 7, 2010
Daphne D. Spencer
1079 US HWY 17 S
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
Dear Landowner:
�wtisr�
DEC 2 2 2010
6kl�Ne..s ivy....... .....
EUGENE A. CONTI, JR.
SECRETARY
The North Carolina Department of Transportation is planning to replace bridge number 45
on US 264 over Outfall Canal.. The proposed project will replace the aging existing structure over
the Outfall Canal. The project will replace the existing 104 -foot bridge with a 125 -foot bridge. The.
additional length will allow for the replacement of a substandard structure as well as improve the
existing floodplain. This project crosses an Area of Environmental. Concern, as defined by the
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (DCM), and must be approved by the DCM under
provisions of the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA). One of the prerequisites to this approval
is that adjacent riparian landowners be given an opportunity to comment on the proposal. A vicinity,
map and site drawings are enclosed for your review.
The attached form is submitted to ensure that you have an opportunity to comment on the
proposal. The work planned -is depicted in the attached drawing. If you have no objections to ' he
proposal, please return the form with your response within 10 days to this office. If you do have
objections to the project, please forward your comments to:
Enclosures
cc: Stephen Lane, NCDCM
File B-4551
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1598
Mr. Stephen Lane
N. C. Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave.
Morehead City, NC 28557
Tba.nk you for vour cooneration.
0gory
. Thorpe, Ph.D.,
Environmental Management Director, PDEA
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG
LOCATION:
4701 ATLANTIC AVENUE
SUITE 116
RALEIGH NC 27604
I

ADJACENT RIPARIAN LANDOWNER STATEMENT
(Hyde County: Replace Bridge No. 45 over Outfall Canal;
NCDOT TIP B-4551)
General Statutes and Division of Coastal Management General Permit
approval procedures require that riparian landowners with property
adjoining a proposed development in an Area of Environmental Concern
(AEC) be given ten (10) days in which to comment on the proposed
development. This form allows the adjacent riparian landowner to express
either: (1) that he objects to the project; or, (2) that he does not object and
desires to waive his/her right to the 10 -day period so that the processing of
the application can progress more rapidly. Of course, the adjacent riparian
iandown�l r"eed not sign this form at all if he/she so chooses.
I, , am an adjacent riparian property owner and
am aware of the North Carolina Department of Transportation's plans for
replacing bridge number 45 over Outfall Canal in Hyde County, North
Carolina. I am Further aware that this work will occur in one or more Areas of
Environmental Concern and therefore will require authorization from the
Division of Coastal Management in accordance with the Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA).
I have no objection to the project as presently proposed and
hereby, waive that right of objection as provided in General
Statute 113-229
I have objections to the project as presently proposed and my
comments are attached
Signature of Adjacent Riparian Landowner Date
Phone Number with Area Code
PA

BCM mP4
APPLICATION for
Mayor Development Permit DEC' 2010
(last revised 12/27/06)
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1. Primary Applicant/ Landowner Information
Business Name
Project Name (if applicable)
North Carolina Department Of Transportation
B-4551 (33764.1.1)
Last Name
Applicant 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Mailing Address
Gregory
PO Box
Thorpe
State
Applicant 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
- ext.
If additional applicants, please attach an additional page(s) with names listed.
FAX No.
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
1598 Mail Service Center
ZIP
Raleigh
NC
ZIP
Country
Phone No.
No.
276991598
USA
919 - 431 - 2000 ext.
rFAX
19 - 431 - 2002
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
4701 Atlantic Ave, Suite 116
Raleigh
NC
27604 -
Email
[e-mail]
2. Agent(Contractor Information
Business Name
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
ZIP
Phone No. 1
-
- ext.
Phone No. 2
- - ext.
FAX No.
Contractor #
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
<Form continues on back>
252-808-2808 .. 1-888-4 S r rr�v�vt,�����aas��lzz€aaa e�xa.r�z.rse�

Form DCM MP -1 (Page 2 of 5)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
3. Project Location
County (can be multiple)
Street Address
State Rd. #
Hyde
intersection of US 264 & SR 1164
US 264
Subdivision Name
City
State
Zip
New Holland
NC
27885-
7885-Phone
PhoneNo.
Lot No. (s) (rf many, attach additional page with list)
- - ext.
I I I ,
a. In which NC river basin is the project located?
b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
Tar/Pamlico
Lake Mattamuskeet outfall canal
c. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade?
d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
®Natural ❑Manmade ❑Unknown
Albemarle Sound
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
f. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
❑Yes ®No
work falls within.
4.
Site Description
a.
Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.)
b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.)
465
170,000
c.
Size of individual lot(s)
d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
N/A, I I
NWL (normal water level)
(If many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list)
2' - 6' ❑NHW or ®NWL
e.
Vegetation on tract
Agriculture field, ditches, grass (shoulder, yard); Acer rubrum, Liquidambar styracifula, Albizia julibrissin, Vitis rotundifolia,
Toxicodendron radicans, Festuca spp., Eupatorium capilifolium, Juncus spp., Carex spp.
f.
Man-made features and uses now on tract
Bridge and roadway approaches; residence, abandoned business, agriculture, roadway facility including ditches
g.
Identify and describe the existing land uses adjacent to the proposed project site.
Agriculture, residence, abandoned business
h.
How does local government zone the tract?
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
Right of Way
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
®Yes ❑No ❑NA
j.
Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? ❑Yes ®No
k.
Hasa professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. ®Yes ❑No ❑NA
If yes, by whom? North Carolina Dept. of Cultural
Resources - State Historic
Preservation Office
I.
Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a []Yes ®No [INA
National Register listed or eligible property?
<Form continues on next page>
2152•60B.,2806 „ 1-888-4RCOA T .l

Form DCM MP -1 (Page 3 of 5)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
m. (i) Are there wetlands on the site? ❑Yes ®No
(ii) Are there coastal wetlands on the site? ❑Yes ®No
(iii) If yes to either (i) or (ii) above, has a delineation been conducted? ®Yes [:]No
(Attach documentation, if available)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
None
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
None
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems.
None
5. Activities and Impacts
a.
Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use? ❑Commercial ®Public/Government
❑Private/Community
b.
Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
Replace existing bridge due to low sufficiency and structurally deficient ratings. Bridge will be lengthened; the road facility
will be improved. Safety will be enhanced through widening of bridge and addition of guardrail.
c.
Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
Top/down construction is proposed at existing location with no temporary causeway(s). Typical construction equipment
includes crane, bulldozer, dump trucks, motor grader, etc.
d.
List all development activities you propose.
Replace/Lengthen bridge; addition of fill due to widening facility and raising of the existing road grade. The grade has to be
raised to provide minimum grade across new bridge. Realigning and re -grade existing road west of crossing to improve
curve/safety of facility. Power utility relocation --remove aerials proximate to road and re -rout aerials further away from bridge
to north and south. Telephone utility relocation --remove existing aerials and bore utility under the canal; bore site will be
greater than 25 feet away from Outfall Canal. The 4" water line will be relocated by contractor during construction without
impacting stream or wetland areas.
e.
Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? Both
f.
What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project? 2.0 ❑Sq.Ft or ®Acres
g.
Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area ®Yes ❑No ❑NA
that the public has established use of?
h.
Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
Existing ditches drain to canal in SE and NE quadrants. Sheet flow immediately adjacent to Outfall Canal in SW quadrant
drains to stream buffer zone; area east of SR 1164 in SW quadrant drains away from stream. Sheet flow in NW quadrant
drains to stream buffer zone. Proposed grass swale on SE quadrant which will outlet to stream; pipe in NE quad will tie-in to
this grass swale. Proposed grass swale in SW quadrant that will drain SW quad and NW quadrant (via pipe tie-in) away
from stream. Proposed re -grade to drain sheet flow into re -vegetated buffer zone immediately adjacent to stream in NW and
SW quadrants.
i.
Will wastewater or stormwater be discharged into a wetland? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water? ❑Yes ❑No ®NA
j.
Is there any mitigation proposed? ®Yes ❑No ❑NA ORfl
U
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal.
2- 80fi• 2 8 & a,--mas ta I a nag arne at.nat

Form DCM MP -1 (Page 4 of 5)
<Form continues on back>
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
6. Additional Information
In addition to this completed application form, (MP -1) the following items below, if applicable, must be submitted in order for the application
package to be complete. Items (a) — (f) are always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
instruction booklet on how to properly prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
f. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name See attached list Phone No.
Address
Name Phone No.
Address
Name Phone No.
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, if applicable.
i. Wetland delineation, if necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10), if necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
7. Certification and Permission to Enter on Land
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Date I C-7 - 1 S - Ilo Print Name 11 LI W 621C
Signature ��;x4��A
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed project.
❑DCM MP -2 Excavation and Fill Information ®DCM MP -5 Bridges and Culverts
❑DCM MP -3 Upland Development
❑DCM MP -4 Structures Information
252- 8 0S-2 8 G8,

Form DCM MP -5
BRIDGES and CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP -1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
1. BRIDGES El This section not applicable
a. Is the proposed bridge: b. Water body to be crossed by bridge:
❑Commercial ®Public/Government ❑Private/Community Lake Mattamuskeet Outfall Canal
c. Type of bridge (construction material):
21" Cored Slab
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at NLW or NWL:
4'
e. (i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? ®Yes ❑No f
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge: 104'
(iii) Width of existing bridge: 28'
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge: 4'
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain) Yes, All of the existing bridge will be
removed
9• Length of proposed bridge: 125 ft
(i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert? ❑Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert:
(iii) Width of existing culvert:
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
h- Width of proposed bridge: 45'
i. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow? []Yes ®No j. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by reducing or
If yes, explain: increasing the existing navigable opening? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain:
k- Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge: 4'
I. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard concerning their
approval? ®Yes [:]No
If yes, explain: Per US Coast Guard letter (Aug. 16, 2005)
waterway subject to tidal influence, therefore is considered
navigable for Bridge Administration purposes --however,
waterway not navigated by other than small boats.
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing no navigable n. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands: 4'
waters? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain: Per US Coast Guard letter (Aug. 16, 2005)
waterway subject to tidal influence, therefore is considered
navigable for Bridge Administration purposes --however,
waterway not navigated by other than small boats.
"' •!Y n111rM1
Vw yst�r✓
UEC 2 2 2010
h1!/IrLli4M v..i ✓Ywl
2. CULVERTS ®This section not applicable
-808.2808 1- Ski-sbl iyrya rfe s araa remsed 1W26i 6

Forte - (Bridges anted Pn 2 of )
a Number of culverts proposed:
c. Type of culvert (construction material):
d. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
b. Water body in which the culvert is to be placed:
< Form continues on back>
❑Yes [--]No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge:
(iii) Width of existing bridge:
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge: _
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain)
e. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
❑Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert(s):
(iii) Width of existing culvert(s):
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
f• Length of proposed culvert: 9- Width of proposed culvert:
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the NHW or NWL. i. Depth of culvert to be buried below existing bottom contour.
j. Will the proposed culvert affect navigation by reducing or k. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
increasing the existing navigable opening? ❑Yes ❑No [--]Yes ❑No
If yes, explain:
If yes, explain:
3. EXCAVATION and FILL El This section not applicable
a. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation below the NMN or NWL? ❑Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated:
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated:
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated:
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards:
b. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
❑WL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
252-806-2808 :: 1- 8 -s RCOA ST .: ww nccq st aImana9 Mpnt pqt revise-& I £3:26 n6

Form 70CIVI WI P-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 3 of 4)
C. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
high -ground excavation? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated: 19'
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated: 75'
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated: 2'
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards: 120
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any excavation, please complete the following:
(i) Location of the spoil disposal area: To be determined by contractor.
e.
9
(ii) Dimensions of the spoil disposal area: unknown
(iii) Do you claim title to the disposal area? ❑Yes ®No (If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.)
(iv) Will the disposal area be available for future maintenance? ❑Yes ❑No
(v) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAVs), other wetlands (WL), or shell
bottom (SB)?
❑CW ❑SAV OWL ❑SB ®None
If any boxes are checked, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
(vi) Does the disposal area include any area below the NHW or NWL? ? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
(i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed below NHW or NWL? ❑Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled:
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled:
(iv) Purpose of fill:
(i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed on high -ground? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled: 1,100'
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled: 50'
(iv) Purpose of fill: Proposed roadway embankment
4. GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project require the relocation of any existing b
utility lines? ®Yes ❑No
If yes, explain: Telephone utilities will be relocated on-site
via directional bore. Tideland EMC (power) will remove
aerials proximate to proposed construction and will re -
rout aerials to north and south farther away from bridge.
Embarq (telephone) will remove aerials and will bore
(i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
❑WL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
�.�AryM fPrY
DEC 2 2 2010
�bMdMM�MMMr , „
fir..
Will the proposed project require the construction of any temporary
detour structures? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain: Bridge will be replaced on existing
location with a bridge using phased construction. Two-
way traffic will be maintained using signals during
construction in phases. During phase 1, traffic will be
maintained on south half of existing bridge, and
252-808-2308 .: 1-688-4 C O ST � vvW ncco z&taiar�ara M! raM nit revised: 1€t�26:06

r g VCPA MP-5(Bridges and Culverts, Page 4 of 411
facility under canal (to north of bridge). Hyde County
Water will relocate water line; See attached utility plans
and drawings.
If this portion of the proposed project has already received
approval from local authorities, please attach a copy of the
approval or certification.
reversed to north on new half of bridge during phase 2.
No temporary bridge structure will be utilized.
< Form continues on back>
c. Will the proposed project require any work channels? d. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion
❑Yes ®No controlled?
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2. Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds will be
implemented.
e. What type of construction equipment will be used (for example, f. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project site?
dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
❑Yes ®No
Standard NCDOT road & bridge construction equipment will If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
be employed, including by not limited to a crane, bulldozer, environmental impacts.
dump truck, and motor grader.
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
shoreline stabilization? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, complete form MP -2, Section 3 for Shoreline
Stabilization only.
Date
I Z .15-,0
Project Name C) _
Applicant Name
i
Applicant Signature
., t

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
Project: 33764.1.1
TIP No. B-4551
Hyde County
06/11/2009
Hydraulics Project Manager: Roger Weadon, P.E. (MA Engineering),
Marshal Clawson, P.E. (NCDOT Hydraulics Unit)
ROADWAY DESCRIPTION
The project B-4551 consists of replacing the Bridge No.45 on US -264 over an outfall
canal for Lake Mattamuskeet with a 3 -span (2@40', 1@45', total length 125') 21" cored
slab bridge in Hyde County, North Carolina. The total project length is 0.214 miles. The
project creates impacts to the outfall canal, which is in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin. The
project drainage systems consist of storm drainage grate inlet, pipes, driveway pipes,
roadside ditches, and drainage swales.
Jurisdiction Stream: Outfall Canal for Lake Mattamuskeet
ENVIRONMENTAL DESCRIPTION
The project is located within the Tar Pamlico River Basin in Hyde County. Since the
body of water is an outfall canal it classified as "SC" by the North Carolina Department
of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) — Division of Water Quality. The Canal
and the stream buffers will be impact by the proposed project. The outfall canal does
have stream buffer requirements although much what could be classified as buffer area is
already occupied by existing roads and driveways.
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND MAJOR STRUCTURES
The primary goal of Best Management Practices (BMPs) is to prevent degradation of the
states surface waters by the location, construction and operation of the highway system.
The BMPs are activities, practices and procedures taken to prevent or reduce stormwater
pollution. The BMP measures used on this project to reduce stormwater impacts are:
Grassed Swale - 425 feet in length
Rip rap pads at pipe outlets.
No bridge deck drains over canal
DEC 22 201(1

o stem
l e�17 ell
PROGRAM
November 4, 2009
Mr. Brian Wrenn
N. C. Division of Water Quality
Mail Service Center 1650
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Dear Mr. Wrenn:
Subject: EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
B-4551, Replace Bridge Number 45 over a canal on US 264, Hyde County; Tar -Pamlico River Basin
(Cataloging Unit 03020105); Northern Outer Coastal Plain (NOCP) Eco -Region
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) will provide the
buffer mitigation for the unavoidable impact associated with the above referenced project. Based on the information
supplied by the NCDOT on November 3, 2009, the impacts are located in CU 03020105 of the Tar -Pamlico River
Basin in the Northern Outer Coastal Plain (NOCP) Eco -Region, and the anticipated mitigation credits needed to
offset the impacts are as follows:
Tar -Pamlico
03020105
NOCP
Stream
Wetlands
Buffer (Sq. Ft.)
Cold
Cool
Warm
Riparian
Non-
Riparian
Coastal
Marsh
Zone 1
Zone
2
Impacts (feet/acres)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
158
Mitigation Units
0
0
0
0
0 0 0 237
The NCDOT will be responsible to ensure that the appropriate compensation for the buffer mitigation will
be provided in the agreed upon method of fund transfer. Upon receipt of the NCDWQ's Buffer Authorization
Certification, EEP will transfer funds from Fund 2984 (Tri -Party MOA Account) into Fund 2982 and commit to
provide the appropriate buffer mitigation to offset the impacts associated with this project. If the buffer impacts or
the amount of mitigation required from EEP increases or decreases for this project, then this mitigation acceptance
letter will no longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be required. All buffer mitigation requests
and approvals are administrated through the Riparian Restoration Buffer Fund (Fund 2982).
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth Harmon at 919 -715 -
1929.
Sincerely,
V
Willia D Gilmore, P.E.
EEP Director
cc: Mr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., NCDOT-PDEA DEC 2
Mr. Bill Biddlecome, USACE — Washington Regulatory Field Office
File: B-4551
R atorzil�g... ... Protect 0r w Stat&
e��
NCDENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 /www.nceep.net

ADJACENT RIPARIAN LANDOWNER STATEMENT
(Hyde County: Replace Bridge No. 45 over Outfall Canal;
NCDOT TIP B-4551)
General Statutes and Division of Coastal Management General Permit approval
procedures require that riparian landowners with property adjoining a proposed
development in an Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) be given ten (10) days in which
to comment on the proposed development, This form allows the adjacent riparian
landowner to express either: (1) that he objects to the project; or, (2) that he does not
object and desires to waive his/her right to the 10 -day period so that the processing of the
application can progress more rapidly. Of course, the adjacent riparian landowner need
not sign this form at all if he/she so chooses.
I, Gw tl. S Q A. AVC Sm an adjacent riparian property owner and am aware
of the N rth Carolina Department of Transportation's plans for replacing bridge number 45
over Outfall Canal in Hyde County, North Carolina. I am further aware that this work will
occur in one or more Areas of Environmental Concern and therefore will require
authorization from the Division of Coastal Management in accordance with the Coastal
Area Management Act (CAMA).
V I have no objection to the project as presently proposed and
hereby waive that right of objection as provided in General Statute 113-229
I have objections to the project as presently proposed and my
comments are attached
igna a of Adja aKf
/F rian Landow er Date
1
Phone Number with Area Code
4� Q2-- 3 3 �- q ( V/

Lane, Stephen
From: Ward, Garcy
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 3:27 PM
To: Fontaine, Lance P. Ph.D.
Cc: Lane, Stephen; Carrillo, Sonia; Ward, Garcy
Subject: B-4551
Lance,
It was determined that the Outfall Canal, at the location of bridge # 45 in Hyde County, is not subject to the Tar -Pamlico
Riparian buffer rules. This determination was made based on 15A NCAC 026.0259 (3)(a)(i) which exempts "Ditches and
manmade conveyances other than modified natural streams unless constructed for navigation or boat access."
The canal is obviously a manmade feature and at this location does not appear to receive significant boat use. Therefore
, a Buffer Authorization is not required to proceed with the bridge replacement. And because a 404 permit was not
issued, a 401 Water Quality Certification is not required either. Stephen Lane would have issued the BA under the MOU
with Water Quality and I've already discussed this with him. For future reference, there is a boat ramp near the end of
the canal and the canal would be subject downstream of the last crossing. Let me or Stephen know if you have any
questions. Thanks—Garcy
Sonia this is DWQ # 10-1058. Can you please file appropriately in BIMS. Thanks.
E-mail correspondence to and form this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.

Lane, Stephen
From: Fontaine, Lance P. Ph.D.
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 3:32 PM
To: Lane, Stephen
Cc: Rivenbark, Chris
Subject: B-4551 additional debit approval
Stephen -
Per our conversation this PM, you are authorized to debit an additional $400 out of WBS 33764.1.1 for the CAMA Utility
permit.
Please let me know if you need additional information for this matter.
Lance
Lance P. Fontaine, Ph.D.
Environmental Biologist
NCDOT, Natural Environment Unit
Office - 919-431-6667
Fax - 919-431-2002
[e-mail]
t_:rnaii correspondence to and frorn this sender is subject to the N.C. Kibkc Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Lane, Stephen
From: Hart, Kevin
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 1:43 PM
To: Lane, Stephen
Subject: Outfall Canal Bridge
Stephen,
I'm assuming it will be pretty quick work with only 2 bents in the water so DMF is OK with the Feb 15 to June 30
moratorium for the bridge over Outfall Canal.
Kevin
Kevin Hart
Marine Biologist
Habitat Section
North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
252-948-3878
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to
third parties.

In
V)
Z
CL
-THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY �•�W::`�"'
MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES
-CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT DEC 222010
SHALL BE TO THE LIMITS
ESTABLISHED BY METHOD 11
+T� a rr n Roma RertRenrr. nn xeer
\' IC
DIVISPON. (OF H G�-I��oAYS _ B-4551 �
_ er.rr vRa. xn v...nor ,vo nrxgrnrrar
33764.1.1 BR51P-0264 23
--- --
33764.2.1 BRSTP-0264(23) RhN & UTII
HE'D.. CO UNTY
. ... ... . ......
. . ...... . . .. . . .........
LOCATION. • BR;)GE NO. 45 OVER A CANAL ON US 264
TYPE OF WORK': GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, AND STRUCTURE
4
BEGIN TIP PROJECT B -455/p
POT -L- ST -1'. 16+85.00 A w
00
END TIP PROJECT B-4551
i POC -L- STA 2B+15.00
_ US 264
N US 264
Ali p i
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION END CONSTRUCTION
-L- STA16403.45
-L- STAB+92.00
BEGIN BRIDGE END BRIDGE
-L- STA 2/+96.44 I -L- STA 23+22.50
a A
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
PE.
SIGNA7IJRE:
PRELt�IN?RY PLANS,
]O hOT VSE FOR CONSTRUCTION'
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
.l G• T
PF
NCDOT Contact; B. Doug Taylor, PE
Roadway Design -Engineering Coordination
GRAPHIC SCALES
DESIGN DATA
PROJECT LENGTH
_ Precoreo in tile crr,Ce or
ADT 2010 = 2820
DYER, RIDDLE, MILLS & PRECOURT, INC. (DRMP)
50 25 0 50 100
J
ADT 2030 = 4200
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4551 =
7506 EAST INDEPENDENCE BLVD_ SUITE 1D5
0J90 MILE CHARLOTTE. NORTH CAROLINA 26227
DHV = 10 %
[phone] NC LICENSE NO. C-2213
PLANS
D = 60 %
LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-4551
= 0.024 MILE 2005 STA?ZD'"D SPECLFTCd7ToNS
5,0 25 0 50 100
T = 5% (TTST 2%, DUAL 3%)
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT B-4551 =
ff �� _ �
V = 60 MPH
02,`4 MILE RIGHT OF WAY DATE: Ronald C. Smith PE
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
DESIGN EXCEPTION
2010 -._ - PROJECr ENGnVMM
....
IP5 10
0
SUPERELEVATION RATE _
f �-J � I
�7
emax 4%
LETTING DATE: A. Matthew Thigpen, PE
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
FDNC cuss = MINOR ARTERIAL
___ OCTOBER, 2011 PROJECT DESIGN ENGPMER
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
PE.
SIGNA7IJRE:
PRELt�IN?RY PLANS,
]O hOT VSE FOR CONSTRUCTION'
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
.l G• T
PF

NOTE: PAVEMENT EDGE SLOPES ARE 1:1 UNLL:bb UMVWN VlMtm"l0m-
-L- (US 264)
/AotCt A • 12' I - 12'
4' --
AVE
GRADE_.
iC_3 POINT
T
6g%
'2% 2%
ORIGINAL T
GROUND
' 13' WITH GUARDRAIL
GRADE TO THIS LINE -
!E2) - iE2i
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1
V-2"
1" OFFSET 9'-3 12'
1 BAR METAL RAIL, (AT -L- STA
....__...._._—__ 22+60.00)
51.5" MIN. ASPHALT 4°h
2'-6'' OVERLAY
000 00 00 00 00 0
♦ 3y
yT ' ORIGINAL
T ' GROUND
USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1
-L- STA 19+28.00 TO -L- STA 21+96.44 (BEGIN BRIDGE)
-L- STA 23+22.50 (END BRIDGE) TO -L- STA 25+93.00
-L- (US 264)
12' 12' 8'
-L- (US 264) LONG CORD -1
44'0"
i
42'-6"
1" OFFSET
12' 9'4"
0I,, _- , 1 BAR METAL RAIL
(AT -L- STA
I GRADE 22+60.00)
I POINT 4% 2,4"
, -6
I
14
O 00 00 00 OO 00 00 00 00
4%
15 CORED SLAB UNITS
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 3
( NOTE: BRIDGE IS CENTERED ON THE LONG CORD
BETWEEN -L- STA 21+69.44 AND -L- STA 23+22.50
AND IS PARALLEL TO THE TANGENT TO THE -L- CURVE
AT -L- STA 22+59.47)
PAVEMENT SCHEDULE
cl
PROP.
APPROX. 2.5" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE SF9.5A,
AT AN
AVERAGE RATE OF 137.5 LBS. PER SQ. YD. IN EACH OF TWO LAYERS
PROP.
APPROX. 1.5" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE 89.5B,
C2
AT AN
AVERAGE RATE OF 168 LBS. PER SQ. YD.
PROP.
APPROX. 3.0" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE S9.5B,
C,3
AT AN
AVERAGE RATE OF 168 LBS. PER SO. YD. IN EACH OF TWO LAYERS,
PROP.
VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE S9.56,
1 5"
CMIN.
AT AN
AVERAGE RATE OF 112 LBS. PER SQ. YD. PER 1" DEPTH.
C4
TO BE
PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 1-5" IN DEPTH OR GREATER
THAN
2.0" IN DEPTH.
E1
PROP.
APPROX. 4.0" ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B25.OB,
1
AT AN
AVERAGE RATE OF 456 LBS. PER SQ. Y0.
PROP.
APPROX. 5.0" ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B25.08,
EZ
AT AN
AVERAGE RATE OF 570 LBS. PER SQ. YD.
PROP.
VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE 825.08,
AT AN
AVERAGE RATE OF 114 LBS. PER SO. YD. PER 1" DEPTH, TO BE
E3
PLACED
IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 3" IN DEPTH OR GREATER
THAN
5.5" IN DEPTH.
T
EARTH MATERIAL.
U
EXISTING PAVEMENT.
W
WEDGING. (SEE WEDGING DETAIL, THIS SHEET)
NOTE: PAVEMENT EDGE SLOPES ARE 1:1 UNLL:bb UMVWN VlMtm"l0m-
-L- (US 264)
/AotCt A • 12' I - 12'
4' --
AVE
GRADE_.
iC_3 POINT
T
6g%
'2% 2%
ORIGINAL T
GROUND
' 13' WITH GUARDRAIL
GRADE TO THIS LINE -
!E2) - iE2i
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1
V-2"
1" OFFSET 9'-3 12'
1 BAR METAL RAIL, (AT -L- STA
....__...._._—__ 22+60.00)
51.5" MIN. ASPHALT 4°h
2'-6'' OVERLAY
000 00 00 00 00 0
♦ 3y
yT ' ORIGINAL
T ' GROUND
USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1
-L- STA 19+28.00 TO -L- STA 21+96.44 (BEGIN BRIDGE)
-L- STA 23+22.50 (END BRIDGE) TO -L- STA 25+93.00
-L- (US 264)
12' 12' 8'
-L- (US 264) LONG CORD -1
44'0"
i
42'-6"
1" OFFSET
12' 9'4"
0I,, _- , 1 BAR METAL RAIL
(AT -L- STA
I GRADE 22+60.00)
I POINT 4% 2,4"
, -6
I
14
O 00 00 00 OO 00 00 00 00
4%
15 CORED SLAB UNITS
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 3
( NOTE: BRIDGE IS CENTERED ON THE LONG CORD
BETWEEN -L- STA 21+69.44 AND -L- STA 23+22.50
AND IS PARALLEL TO THE TANGENT TO THE -L- CURVE
AT -L- STA 22+59.47)
(BMP
R MIENP
USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 3
-L- STA 21+96.44 (BEGIN BRIDGE)
TO -L- STA 23+22.50 (END BRIDGE)
TRANSITION FROM TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1
TO EXISTING (INCLUDES FEATHERING)
-L- STA 16+85.00 (BEGIN PROJECT) TO -L- STA 17+00.00
TRANSITION FROM TYPICAL SECTION NO. 2
TO EXISTING (INCLUDES FEATHERING)
-L- STA 28+00.00 TO -L- STA 28+15.00 (END PROJECT)
4' ._
4
PAVED
(C31
VJ i
1 5"
CMIN.
GRADE
POINT
%
_
i
\C3
8%
T
VARIES ►
VARIES
1
g°A
_--
1
g.
Ty EZ
8„)
l
-
/E2 , T
ZT-f7ORIGINAL
ORIGINAL
j
_.' _
GROUND
GROUND
13' WITH
GUARDRAIL
L°
I
TYPICAL
SECTION
--GRADE
TO THIS LINE
GRADE TO THIS LINE -
. -N.0.2
USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 2
-L- STA
17+00.00 TO -L- STA 19+28.00
-L- STA
25+93.00 TO -L- STA 28+00.00
(BMP
R MIENP
USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 3
-L- STA 21+96.44 (BEGIN BRIDGE)
TO -L- STA 23+22.50 (END BRIDGE)
TRANSITION FROM TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1
TO EXISTING (INCLUDES FEATHERING)
-L- STA 16+85.00 (BEGIN PROJECT) TO -L- STA 17+00.00
TRANSITION FROM TYPICAL SECTION NO. 2
TO EXISTING (INCLUDES FEATHERING)
-L- STA 28+00.00 TO -L- STA 28+15.00 (END PROJECT)

ORIGINAL
GROUND
* 13' WITH GUARDRAIL
-L- (US 264)
STAGE 1 CONSTRUCTION
GRADE TO THIS LINE -
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1
STAGE 1 CONSTRUCTION
-- EXIST. --- _�I"
PAV'T.
USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1, STAGE 1
-L- STA 19+28.00 TO -L- STA 21+96.44 (BEGIN BRIDGE)
-L-STA 23+22.50 (END BRIDGE)TO -L-STA 25+93.00
-L- (US 264)
STAGE 2 CONSTRUCTION
VARIES
-- SHOUIDER
16'
7GRADIE
2%
i
i E2
L°
'EXIST. TEMPORARY PAVEMENT (TO BE REMOVED)
' 13' WITH GUARDRAIL USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1, STAGE 2
GRADE TO THIS LINE - - TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1
-L- STA 19+28.00 TO -L- STA 21+96.44 (BEGIN BRIDGE)
STAGE 2 CONSTRUCTION -L- STA 23+22.50 (END BRIDGE) TO -L- STA 25+93.00
2' *
VARIES SHOULDER
_B%
ORIGINAL T
GROUND _
5' WITH GUARDRAIL
GRADE TO THIS LINE -
-Y- /-Y1-
2'
9' 91 SHOULDER
_ VARIES
C1; GRADE t
i POINT Cl
°
_....z�o._.. 2% 8% SLOPE TO DRAIN ORIGINAL
/ `71 _ GROUND
__
6.5 A � � � I ORIGINAL
!
El) GROUND
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 4 USE TYPICAL SECTION NO.4
-Y- STA 11+00.00 TO -Y- STA 13+48.38
-Yl- STA 14+32.40 TO -Yl- STA 15+65.78
TRANSITION FROM TYPICAL SECTION NO. 4
TO EXISTING (INCLUDES FEATHERING)
-Yl- STA 15+65.78 TO -Yl- STA 15+80.78
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
B-455/ 2A
ROADWAY OFSION PAVEMENT DESIGN
ENGMEER ENGINEER
PREILIMIN.41iY 131 -ANS
DD NOT VSs Pot CONSTRVCTION
QODRMP
D 1 ER, RIDDLE. WILLS 'REC---RT.INC.
S EA:' 1�ilF.FETICtni: f. C��vO.. WTE 105
VC"- OTTE. ll7RTn ChAOCNA
17:7:1 E N.I...
PAVEMENT SCHEDULE
C 1 2E"SFQ.5A
C2 1.5B
C3 3.0"TYPE S9.5B
C4 VAR. DEPTH S9.5B
--- .........
..-- ---
E 1 4.0" 625.08
E2 5.0" B25.OB
E3 VAR. DEPTH TYPE 825.08
T EARTH MATERIAL.
U EXISTING PAVEMENT.
W WEDGING
EL (US 264)
bIAur I c.UNbIKucTION 2' 24' 6,
-...- -
!N. -- -- SHLI
VARIES
0' TO 16
t'
4.1 !.Cl
- - -
MATCH.- 80�
-----_...---- r _
iE2; ••� T ; '
` ORIGINAL
8° GROUND
TYPICAL SECTION NO. S GRADE TO THIS LINE
TEMPORARY PAVEMENT
USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 5
-L- STA 16+03.45 TO -L- STA 21+64.00
-L- STA 23+36.79 TO -L- STA 29+92.00

PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
B -455r 2B
ROADWAY DESIGN PAVEMENT DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
1"RELIMI-N, R1' PLA
W NOT C.". PO � OWIT0.l."CTIOM1
(OM
ft�IENP
TIM
AITAGI 2
V TRAFFIC
-L- US 264 -EL- US 264
22,-6" • 17.42' MIN. WITHIN PROP. BRIDGE LIMITS
EXISTING CLEAR ROADWAY = 28' RADIAL
1T-8316" (16' MIN.) ---- -
2.17' MIN.
TEMPORARY -- STAGE 1 n
GUARDRAIL l TRAFFIC
SP
MIN. AHALT 4% V
OVERLAY - --
---- -
00 00 00 00 00 010,61 �------- --- --- _=T=== T--__ I
7 CORED SLAB UNITS --r--- T T --- _l___s�--r-L -I
-
--r-T---Tq---� (-J
-r-r
BRIDGE TYPICAL SECTION Li i i i i i
STAGE 1 CONSTRUCTION i. i ILJ
EXISTING TYPICAL SECTION
FACING EAST
22.50' AT -L- STA 21 + 96.44
23.521 AT -L- STA 22+59.47 (CENTER OF BRIDGE)
22.50' AT -L- STA 23+22.50
( NOTE: BRIDGE IS CENTERED ON THE LONG CORD
BETWEEN -L- STA 21+69.44 AND -L- STA 23+22.50
AND IS PARALLEL TO THE TANGENT TO THE -L- CURVE
AT -L- STA 22+59.47)
rnr.q�.f1 Rry--
DEC. 2 ` 2010
NOTE: THIS SHEET IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.
(SEE STRUCTURE PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION DETAILS)

,Sim re -
16
pralli��i®ice%©
©%gym ii-�i�%/.�
Puri,
BPC 18RRfL L
-L= POT Sta. t5+ObDo
1 <
ua 211 PG 34g rvr�
1 Z
v 'REMOVE
TYPE III I OUTFALL CANAL ' TYPE III
lY
1
SKETCH SHOWING BRIDGE/PAVEMENT RELATIONSHIP
f
1 •� I
1 1 I
1 MARY T. C18
1
!!_ OB 126 P6 524
-.POT Sto. 17+33.02
1:
1.
I
G
-Yl- CUIW DATA
CURVE t
PI -Y1- Sto /4+63.93
0 = 22' 39' 325' (RT)
D = 57' 17' 448I`
L = 3955'
T = 20.04'
R = 100,09
e = NORMAL CROWN
-Yl- CURVE DATA
CURVE 2
Pl -Yl- Sta l5+125/
0 = 32' 24' 535' (LT)
D = 57' 17' 44.8r
L = 5657'
T = 29.07'
R = 100.00'
e = NORMAL CROWN
.i17'Il _.•, ,1 i 1 1 +89.54
SH ULDBt18ERM,-GU •R3 li I 1 "_� V 5'
IN @ STA. -'n- 1 +32-�1
IN @ APP.
„ 11TE'SLAB _ ,'^y- nLOPOSRD
BEGIN AP ROACH SLAB +9 LT O 'l SMOULDER BERM GURER BST DRIVEWA
,-L- STA 2 +81.43 aS j BEGIN ® APP.SLAB
$86.30 +50.00 O END @ STA. 4- 25+07 LT
+�-L-+7s.00 E
' +86.36 AJN ze7 +2z.e6 �- PRC Sta. l4 44 �E +94.6
�. _ •� � � ' 1 R:,' -,q- z1.93• LT .� y� � E 1 ExIST.
! C7URE PAY REM.. --
'. +91.2 PROPOSED 10' SOIL!:! N7`YF 7 - - -
- -' 4'- .7^�. $ - �S .: _ - , +4<::. R . r is i-� •h ice. x -- -� Gl N
40' GRASS SHALE -�
SEE DETAIL B
BEGIN PROJECT yI ±
-L- POT STA 16 +85.00 I
DETAIL A
LATERAL 'Y' DITCH
,Not to Seale,
Not d Fl
Duna I:+Ft. Slope 2
Min. D= ILD Ft. SAM B. O'NEAL
0= 2.0 Ft. DB 108 PG 447
OB 107 PG 460
FROM -Y- STA, 12+00 TO STA 13+35 LT OB 18 PC 154
c -Y- CURVE DATA
CURVE l
PI -Y- Sto 10+5920
A = r 34' 36.8' (LT)
D = r 19' 553'
L = 118.38'
T = 5920'
R = 4.301.42'
e = NORMAL CROWN
r
-Y-/-Y/-
-Y- CURVE DATA
CURVE 3
PI -Y- Sto 12 t7/Jl
,�s = 45'12'02E (RT)
D = 38' N' 49.87'
L = 118.34'
T = 62.44'
R = /50.00'
e = NORMAL CROWN
-Y- CURVE DATA
CURVE 2
PI -Y- Sto 11+6494
A = 34' 29' 055' (LT)
D = 3611'49.87'
L = 9028'
T = 4655'
R = 150.00'
e = NORMAL CROWN
rl
_ LATERAL M DITCH` \
SEE DETAIL A
-Y- PRC SIa.12+08S6
O \
3
+OB.66
JEAN W.O-NEAL 4
OB 106 PG 464
-Y- PCC Sta11+18.38
�t �. R M Yt ST. GRID
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
p TAI
w
I•, BEGIN BRIDGE
g • .' j L- STA 214-961,
AT -
` `9
GRASS SWALE
.l
nus
X 'i•%�
1 Not to scolel
PRELlNll `A
END CONSTRUCTION
PHI R.
o"
OpO j 2.
O -L- PT
r • h
•
LIP CAR
I OS PC
WAN I . ;i'
2
-Yl- POT STA 15 + 80.78
- it I
Min. D= ILO Fl,
y
11210
08 PG
38
B} 2.0 Ft.
C�
1`t.�
SOIL ROAD
r
EXIST.
ft•''
4.
("I2i
s FROM a,- STA 23+75 TO STA. 28+00 RT"l1
FROM -L. STA 16+21 TO STA. 21+I0
RAY M. SPENCER* 4
CE
RT
D8 CIS PO
? o �{ �S
N
�.- I
1 l '�
}�
.,-ter. I, •
I 6L
.i17'Il _.•, ,1 i 1 1 +89.54
SH ULDBt18ERM,-GU •R3 li I 1 "_� V 5'
IN @ STA. -'n- 1 +32-�1
IN @ APP.
„ 11TE'SLAB _ ,'^y- nLOPOSRD
BEGIN AP ROACH SLAB +9 LT O 'l SMOULDER BERM GURER BST DRIVEWA
,-L- STA 2 +81.43 aS j BEGIN ® APP.SLAB
$86.30 +50.00 O END @ STA. 4- 25+07 LT
+�-L-+7s.00 E
' +86.36 AJN ze7 +2z.e6 �- PRC Sta. l4 44 �E +94.6
�. _ •� � � ' 1 R:,' -,q- z1.93• LT .� y� � E 1 ExIST.
! C7URE PAY REM.. --
'. +91.2 PROPOSED 10' SOIL!:! N7`YF 7 - - -
- -' 4'- .7^�. $ - �S .: _ - , +4<::. R . r is i-� •h ice. x -- -� Gl N
40' GRASS SHALE -�
SEE DETAIL B
BEGIN PROJECT yI ±
-L- POT STA 16 +85.00 I
DETAIL A
LATERAL 'Y' DITCH
,Not to Seale,
Not d Fl
Duna I:+Ft. Slope 2
Min. D= ILD Ft. SAM B. O'NEAL
0= 2.0 Ft. DB 108 PG 447
OB 107 PG 460
FROM -Y- STA, 12+00 TO STA 13+35 LT OB 18 PC 154
c -Y- CURVE DATA
CURVE l
PI -Y- Sto 10+5920
A = r 34' 36.8' (LT)
D = r 19' 553'
L = 118.38'
T = 5920'
R = 4.301.42'
e = NORMAL CROWN
r
-Y-/-Y/-
-Y- CURVE DATA
CURVE 3
PI -Y- Sto 12 t7/Jl
,�s = 45'12'02E (RT)
D = 38' N' 49.87'
L = 118.34'
T = 62.44'
R = /50.00'
e = NORMAL CROWN
-Y- CURVE DATA
CURVE 2
PI -Y- Sto 11+6494
A = 34' 29' 055' (LT)
D = 3611'49.87'
L = 9028'
T = 4655'
R = 150.00'
e = NORMAL CROWN
rl
_ LATERAL M DITCH` \
SEE DETAIL A
-Y- PRC SIa.12+08S6
O \
3
+OB.66
JEAN W.O-NEAL 4
OB 106 PG 464
-Y- PCC Sta11+18.38
�t �. R M Yt ST. GRID
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
✓x
„ y
w
I•, BEGIN BRIDGE
g • .' j L- STA 214-961,
AT -
` `9
48.38
.l
nus
X 'i•%�
FOR -Y- PROflLE, SEE SHEET NO. 6
PRELlNll `A
1=L- ;PC Sta. 8+3856
PHI R.
FOR STRUCTURE PLANS, SEE SHEET S-1THRU S -TT
OpO j 2.
O -L- PT
r • h
•
LIP CAR
I OS PC
WAN I . ;i'
2
1
-Y- SR 1164
- it I
,. :.i Sta, 26
nj O
11210
08 PG
38
\OBLITERATE
(
SOIL ROAD
r
EXIST.
Af >Rc rL,
V
RAY M. SPENCER* 4
CE
D8 CIS PO
�. � � .la'' �
E
-
�.- I
1 l '�
}�
.,-ter. I, •
I 6L
11
I
PT Sto. /5
4Q9
„-
.i17'Il _.•, ,1 i 1 1 +89.54
SH ULDBt18ERM,-GU •R3 li I 1 "_� V 5'
IN @ STA. -'n- 1 +32-�1
IN @ APP.
„ 11TE'SLAB _ ,'^y- nLOPOSRD
BEGIN AP ROACH SLAB +9 LT O 'l SMOULDER BERM GURER BST DRIVEWA
,-L- STA 2 +81.43 aS j BEGIN ® APP.SLAB
$86.30 +50.00 O END @ STA. 4- 25+07 LT
+�-L-+7s.00 E
' +86.36 AJN ze7 +2z.e6 �- PRC Sta. l4 44 �E +94.6
�. _ •� � � ' 1 R:,' -,q- z1.93• LT .� y� � E 1 ExIST.
! C7URE PAY REM.. --
'. +91.2 PROPOSED 10' SOIL!:! N7`YF 7 - - -
- -' 4'- .7^�. $ - �S .: _ - , +4<::. R . r is i-� •h ice. x -- -� Gl N
40' GRASS SHALE -�
SEE DETAIL B
BEGIN PROJECT yI ±
-L- POT STA 16 +85.00 I
DETAIL A
LATERAL 'Y' DITCH
,Not to Seale,
Not d Fl
Duna I:+Ft. Slope 2
Min. D= ILD Ft. SAM B. O'NEAL
0= 2.0 Ft. DB 108 PG 447
OB 107 PG 460
FROM -Y- STA, 12+00 TO STA 13+35 LT OB 18 PC 154
c -Y- CURVE DATA
CURVE l
PI -Y- Sto 10+5920
A = r 34' 36.8' (LT)
D = r 19' 553'
L = 118.38'
T = 5920'
R = 4.301.42'
e = NORMAL CROWN
r
-Y-/-Y/-
-Y- CURVE DATA
CURVE 3
PI -Y- Sto 12 t7/Jl
,�s = 45'12'02E (RT)
D = 38' N' 49.87'
L = 118.34'
T = 62.44'
R = /50.00'
e = NORMAL CROWN
-Y- CURVE DATA
CURVE 2
PI -Y- Sto 11+6494
A = 34' 29' 055' (LT)
D = 3611'49.87'
L = 9028'
T = 4655'
R = 150.00'
e = NORMAL CROWN
rl
_ LATERAL M DITCH` \
SEE DETAIL A
-Y- PRC SIa.12+08S6
O \
3
+OB.66
JEAN W.O-NEAL 4
OB 106 PG 464
-Y- PCC Sta11+18.38
�t �. R M Yt ST. GRID
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
✓x
„ y
w
I•, BEGIN BRIDGE
g • .' j L- STA 214-961,
AT -
` `9
48.38
.l
REN
X 'i•%�
FOR -Y- PROflLE, SEE SHEET NO. 6
PRELlNll `A
GRA TO
I
FOR STRUCTURE PLANS, SEE SHEET S-1THRU S -TT
OpO j 2.
"NSTRU=011
J
-L- P07 Sta. 29+95.39
83 �0
9g
1
-Y- SR 1164
2010
nj O
TRAFFIC DATA
JAMES A. TOPPING '
\OBLITERATE
(
SOIL ROAD
r
EXIST.
% �99
+31.81 ✓ '' J
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION /
-Y- POC Sta. 11+00.00
-Y- PC Sta.10+00DO L
m
F-CSTAG€
6
END APPROF
A- STA 23+
tOPOSED END BRIDGE
I'SOIL
EWAY -L- STA 23+22.50
RN
- Sta. 23+ .07 (33.73' RT)=
1 -7 Olr.- 7"t - -
O
RUTH DAVIS
08 82 PG 377
-L- CURVE DATA
CURVE I
PI -L- Sto 22+2477
A = 22' 24' l99' (LT)
D = 2'56'17.7'
L = 762.55'
T = 38621'
R = 1,950.00'
e= 04%
RUNOFF = 107'
DESIGN SPEED = 60 MPH
• DESIGN EXCEPTION FOR
SUPERELEVATION RATE
e= 04%
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
310
w
RAY SHEET NO.
N
I
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENG NEER
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
X 'i•%�
F-CSTAG€
6
END APPROF
A- STA 23+
tOPOSED END BRIDGE
I'SOIL
EWAY -L- STA 23+22.50
RN
- Sta. 23+ .07 (33.73' RT)=
1 -7 Olr.- 7"t - -
O
RUTH DAVIS
08 82 PG 377
-L- CURVE DATA
CURVE I
PI -L- Sto 22+2477
A = 22' 24' l99' (LT)
D = 2'56'17.7'
L = 762.55'
T = 38621'
R = 1,950.00'
e= 04%
RUNOFF = 107'
DESIGN SPEED = 60 MPH
• DESIGN EXCEPTION FOR
SUPERELEVATION RATE
e= 04%
CLASS 'B' RIPRAP
EST.2 TONS
EST.7 F.F.S.Y.
-L- PC S1a.27+_35.77
PAVEMENT REMOVAL
-L- CURVE DATA
CURVE 2
PI -L- Sto 28+5256
4'-\ = 5' 50' 048' (RT)
D = 2' 30' 00.0'
L = 233.39'
T 11679'
R = 229/83'
e = EXISTING
DESIGN SPEED = 60 MPH
-L- POC STA 28 +15.
va 6 PNS T
-L - PT Sta.
-GRASS SWALE
SEE DETAIL 8
UEL, 22 201E
�b�H¢mslreHd. ..,.d dlr..i
-Y1- SR 1330
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
310
8-4551 4
RAY SHEET NO.
n las} aEGGtlri � .i ��om �Rt .
l rwha"'L aYll•f•..:,u--.>:} "� Kl- w.raq L4ld➢
l'.
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENG NEER
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
X 'i•%�
FOR -Y- PROflLE, SEE SHEET NO. 6
PRELlNll `A
,Y PI-ANVS
I
FOR STRUCTURE PLANS, SEE SHEET S-1THRU S -TT
00 -lO VSE M
"NSTRU=011
J
-L- P07 Sta. 29+95.39
83 �0
9g
1
-Y- SR 1164
2010
CLASS 'B' RIPRAP
EST.2 TONS
EST.7 F.F.S.Y.
-L- PC S1a.27+_35.77
PAVEMENT REMOVAL
-L- CURVE DATA
CURVE 2
PI -L- Sto 28+5256
4'-\ = 5' 50' 048' (RT)
D = 2' 30' 00.0'
L = 233.39'
T 11679'
R = 229/83'
e = EXISTING
DESIGN SPEED = 60 MPH
-L- POC STA 28 +15.
va 6 PNS T
-L - PT Sta.
-GRASS SWALE
SEE DETAIL 8
UEL, 22 201E
�b�H¢mslreHd. ..,.d dlr..i
-Y1- SR 1330
®D R M P
310
..�. ., J
17, n EngiANTSneerinINCg
CONSULT,
(500(
n las} aEGGtlri � .i ��om �Rt .
l rwha"'L aYll•f•..:,u--.>:} "� Kl- w.raq L4ld➢
l'.
F FOR -Ir PROFILE, SEE SHEET NO. 5
X 'i•%�
FOR -Y- PROflLE, SEE SHEET NO. 6
I
FOR Y7- PROfltE, SEE SHEET NO. 6
I
FOR STRUCTURE PLANS, SEE SHEET S-1THRU S -TT
130
J
-L- P07 Sta. 29+95.39
1
-Y- SR 1164
2010
to
TRAFFIC DATA
JAMES A. TOPPING '
1 PG 872
'91166.52
-L- Sta° '91166.52 (tT-9Q'tT)=
(
-BL-3 POT 33+85.40
_
` DAA IOD PG SO
,�
- -
I arjl
r
US 264L N 60 ll'
4Q9
„-
CLASS 'B' RIPRAP
EST.2 TONS
EST.7 F.F.S.Y.
-L- PC S1a.27+_35.77
PAVEMENT REMOVAL
-L- CURVE DATA
CURVE 2
PI -L- Sto 28+5256
4'-\ = 5' 50' 048' (RT)
D = 2' 30' 00.0'
L = 233.39'
T 11679'
R = 229/83'
e = EXISTING
DESIGN SPEED = 60 MPH
-L- POC STA 28 +15.
va 6 PNS T
-L - PT Sta.
-GRASS SWALE
SEE DETAIL 8
UEL, 22 201E
�b�H¢mslreHd. ..,.d dlr..i
-Y1- SR 1330
310
(500(
-L 2820
US 264 -
2720-
-L-
US 264
(1200)
(4100)
130
(200)
1
-Y- SR 1164
2010
(2030)
TRAFFIC DATA

r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----------- - - - - ------------- - - - - --
---- ---- ---- -- ---------
I
I P
30 r - - MIOJER IEi 571 NO. !Herr NO.
- _ _ _ _ 8-45 1 4
_ • �di � � s.• ��=i� =;^�
.�.. �- �-.=.a-- � _
!:•J--7' 7�J� 3.a�-V�atJLl--r
i�---�r�r ��r-Nri. NJi•rrrJ a A..
�a N -=zap ==a=ma==Mmaa-�$---asa=m= =mm==
NaM===--- -=_ _ e�9a� �5�"aasNa:�as-m3
ars--::---_== -- -----520, .1,!-= =-
a a��a as -a. ma
----- ----- - - -- slims- ---- MEN. --
m?�z3m==lm?==m=z mailman _ mill --------!Lmzm--- - lama=_=2 -
---- -- -_----=uaa=-m-- mks �a9a =_' -1 s� l ==milli d
- ---
,
--a� rrr ���•..�
rl��a�� o r- a �i s =I.
-tea �- ------ ---- --: -�== ="- = �_�
-�=----------- ---- a--=-3a--------a�-=3=---as--3=-m=a-a
=-_-_____ -N --- ---
a9 ====s-��� Jaz=•�=��®s7-
rir==Ra�rTi,.-.-r�rrr�immr---• -- N �����-�'S'�� jjj���� �j�1yy11
----------- Ilia
as
FIN N
-----A--=aMMMa=== A'___M__$_=____�=__ =a==3==-saa-�a=a=mss �a1
ME
----------------------3sa---a=====-_= =ipj?__= s =�3=====-_�_____
_________=_______====-N=�-------------3---a----- - -- - n
Evil
�� } -1!�_ r.� 1 . •'� I " .�%� 1. 1 'Y;LI�� _... �l.�. r0110 ll --,END BPJDGE
el:>•�
L MOM,
zj
END PROJECT
jo
k?PROACH SLAB
Pre wN ANA. -.iA-
••I •• •a •!. AN, . ,
.,,
RLITH 0A,IS PAVEMENT REMOVAL
06 82 K 37T
r
I I \SOIL KOAD
71 ,
r T,r,
CURVE 2 1. I' I.
CURVE I CURVE 2
• • f ._.4 '
• : JQ ♦ ♦ f
•/ 5 64_ 2820 2720 US 264
• •
f .I II
"
NORMAL "1 • !! !. ..I 11
R 2,291,83' 130
f. 7 e EXISTING
r..
/0+00,00 f I
DESIGN SPEED = .I MPH DESIGN SPEED .I MPH -y- SIR 1164 2010
DESIGN EXCEPTIONI" TRAFFIC DATA
10 SUPERELEVATION RATE
047

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
Article Addressed to:
Jean W. O'Neal
23700 US 264
Swam Quarter, NC 27885
A.
c- ( Agent
11 Addressee
by (Printed Name) I C. Date of Delivery
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? U WE
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Service Type
Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered P4 Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number 7006 081,0 0005 9028 6398
(transfer from service label)
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
—&-stider-Pte,
ise print your name, ddress, and Zl*P4
zr_
LU
Uj
CZ5
s�;Eg-
3-- iE
Lance P. Fontaine (B-4551)
>
29
'4CDOT-Natural Environment Unit
LLJ
c5
1701-116 Atlantic Ave.
;M11 u -
C..) Q c�-
Weigh, NC 27604
w
U-1 sa
0 ;,-- k�
T
-
LU
Cl-
this box

j ■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
i 1. Article Addressed to:
Ruth F. Davis
19700 US 264
Swan Quaver., NC27885
A.
X
❑ Agent
❑ Addressee
B. Received by (Printed Name) C. Date -of Delivery
l� /& i
D. Is delivery address different from item 17 ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Service Type
Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
Registered X Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number
(Transfer from service label) 7006 0 810 0005 9028 6 411
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE "` M`Is.,
•. ti*�v.,�s�;.'i:,.:ye
r•h;Sw.+�S.n'i'4 4. <•�ii�:A •.:.� ' !:C "y'�,!�,.
'--w-S—enU6KTDase
print your name, address, and ZIP
j�
UJ
52
>
N
= W
Lance P. Fontaine (B-4551;
M
Q
S
NCDDT-Natural Environment Unit
4701-, 16 Atlantic Ave.
I
C3
952
Raleigh, NC 27604
ii''''
9..{.1
0
G C-1
14
Lu
C=)
';ON.
nythis box' '..�>-

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
Article Addressed to:
Phillip R. Carawan
PO Box 164
Columbia, NC 27925
WOMIURZI
A. S-gnature ll r
❑ Agent
Q CJ1 �w ❑ Addressee
B. Received by ( Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Service Type
Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered JR Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
ri 2. Article Number 7006 081,0 0005 9028 6404
(Transfer from service lai
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540
r`

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
bK.....; :Y r.»:t'. •I.^ Y''f.44.::YL.Z�V' L'S•'.A".,.. .din
�ti •�'5:_4u ii°,~ -`•tq {�ly.'...t �t Vii.:, yy.t w'
IS Sender:
Please print your name, address, and ZIP-
z
0
W
0
y
4 ance P. Fontaine (B-4551)
N
-CDOT-Natural Environment Unit
FU
cy
P; , 701-116 Atlantic Ave.
C)
o
z 5 aleigh, NC 27604
52 o
w
v
LLJ
LLA
oS2
box •

I ■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
Article Addressed to:
Daphne D. Spencer
1079 US H\VY 17 S
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
�/�� ❑ Agent
X ' 1 (� ^ ❑ Addressee
B. Received by (Printed Name) C. Date f Deliver
D. Is delivery address different from Rem 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3, Service Type
Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered j`'Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4, Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number 7006 0810 0005 9028 6381
(Transfer from service label)
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540
i

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE *.,
y y
.: .fix"� " ' riS�T...., ti:.
.q''I!;N DEC rt_ `��rn ti(^:iii"Ji ..e". •. ..
�'f
en r: Base print your name, address, and ZIP,
w
Uj
o
cc
Lance P. Fontaine (B-4551)
r NCDOT-Natural Environment Unit
W
'~
C> ~ 4701-116 Atlantic Ave.
�
w
�; NC 27604
w
Raleigh,
o ea
C)
W
R
is box