56371_NC DOT_20110406

0f
N° 56371
SrCAMA / ❑ DREDGE & FILL
GENERAL PERMIT
Previous permit# '
[� New ❑Modification []Complete Reissue ❑Partial Reissue Date previous permit issued
As authorized by the State of North Carolina, Department of Environment and Natural Resources y� =-7 H. -)_ .) ti j u oand
�- !
the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant
to 15A NCAC
Applicant Name �/ i
ules attached.
Project Location: County tf f'fiA,`� � /-1"a�0 j,fj
Address 3 tf�',-»" /rf- ` too
Street Address/ State Road/ Lot #(s) f I /V y� '
�.,:� c r ; /V� `-
as 1.<1 %� ,. f �"� l 'y J �: �`'•-J�y #
City State ZIP
Waiver Attached:
Phone # (:) y `Y - lq 77Fax # (_)
Subdivision
Authorized Agent / ` y 1r!'"
City A h ZIP- �- % 1
❑ CW ❑ EW 9 -PTA ❑ ES a-PIr5
Affected
Phone # ( ) River Basin
ElAEC(s): oEA [IHHF ❑ IH ElUBA El N/A
Adj. Wtr. Body �� `''�-/(J � ;-�'.•z c (nat /man
❑ PWS: El FC:
COWyes / rn� PNA yes/ no Crit.Hab. yes / no
ody '����''�
Closest Maj. Wtr. Body-
Type of Project/ Activity z�uc
Pier (dock) length
Platform(s)
Finger pier(s)
Groin length —
number
Bulkhead/ Riprap length
avg distance offshore '
max distance offshore
Basin, channel
cubic yards_
Boat ramp
Boathouse/ Boatlift
Beach Bulldozing
Other -?I' K
4"
©� r
Shoreline Length
SAV: not sure
yes CO)
Sandbags: not sure
yes io
Moratorium: n/a
est no
Photos:
yes 63
Waiver Attached:
yes nod
VV
* ifi-h t .;?o; x
(Scale: [VIA
)
A building permit may be required by: ❑ See note on back regarding River Basin rules.
�!% � 0 r •n-�,,/�.'�-dam.' �/✓c:�� r.'.. c. �1.:.�'G� i % ;�c�� � �,-�ta,r7 jJ -•%- J °.�„+� J,i
Notes/ Special Conditions nn
T il!n "r t �= �'l'� J� f�v,7 faI,'Il
�,nuM r. IZ�•it::</-}-�';..nr,•.f..::.� �inc1' I.. JJ �- �..j�!'f"��" ;.✓rl'i+ fJ,�r�� c�i�l/%=!
Agent or Applicant Printed Name Permit Officer's'Signature
Signature Please read compliance statement on back ofermit" Issuing Date E ir%ion Date
't/vv i9�1i�:,1�r W'�'��p4J7.30. ..fi2 1��r'fi�ol� �uY`4�
30'N' `�S-` �
5 /
Application Fee(s) Check# Local Planning Jurisdiction Rover FileN.ame
.csr„t�exl;a`-.,.;�A....eC�,.,.��..r..�;�`rc•�._.aJ�A'��a,�:i .- w3 _�,iztl�hr3.��t-:;. � ._.ic_... �_res.,a�s4�zr»{a�.•.;;:.rL,.9,.+,s_s34,r<_str.:�:c•�a,s1��_�.�w+'-

AmT,
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor James H. Gregson, Director Dee Freeman, Secretary
December 21, 2010
Clay Willis, Environmental Officer
Division 1
NC Dept. of Transportation
113 Airport Road, Suite 100
Edenton, NC 27932
Dear Mr. Willis:
Attached is General Permit #56371C.
In order to validate this permit, please sign the permit as indicated. Retain the white copy for
your files and return the signed yellow and pink copies to us in the enclosed, self-addressed
envelope. If the signed permit copies are not returned to this office before the initiation of
development, you will be working without authorization and will be subject to a Notice of
Violation and subsequent civil penalties.
We appreciate your early attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
--16 d6'
Stephen Lane
Coastal Management Representative
lsb
Enclosures
400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Internet: www.nccoastaimanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled \ 10% Post Consumer Paper

❑CAMA / ❑ DREDGE & FILL
GENERAL PERMIT Previous permit#
❑New ❑Modification El Complete Reissue El Partial Reissue Date previous permit issued
As authorized by the State of North Carolina, Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant to I SA NCAC
❑ Rules attached.
Applicant Name a Project Location: County
Address Street Address/ State Road/ Lot #(s)
City State ZIP
Phone # O Fax # O Subdivision
Authorized Agent City. ZIP
Affected ❑ CW ❑ EW ❑ PTA ❑ ES ❑ PTS Phone # ( ) River Basin
AEC(s): ❑ OEA ❑ HHF ❑ IH ❑ UBA ❑ N/A Adj. Wtr. Body (nat /man /unkn):
❑ PWS: ❑ FC:
ORW: yes / no PNA yes / no Crit.Hab. yes / no Closest Maj. Wtr. Body
Type of Project/ Activity
— (Scale: )
Pier (dock) length
Platform(s)
i
Finger pier(s)
I
Groin length -- - -'—
number
Bulkhead/ Riprap length
avg distance offshore i
max distance offshore 1
Basin, channel
cubic yards_
Boat ramp
Boathouse/ Boatlift
Beach Bulldozing
Other
Shoreline Length
SAV: not sure
yes
no
1
Sandbags: not sure
yes
no
Moratorium: n/a
yes
no
Photos:
yes
no
Waiver Attached:
yes
no '
A building permit may be required by:
Notes/ Special Conditions
Agent or Applicant Printed Name
Signature ** Please read compliance statement on back of permit **
Application Fee(s)
Check #
❑ See note on back regarding River Basin rules.
Permit Officer's Signature
Issuing Date
Local Planningf urisdiction
Expiration Date
Rover File Name

Statement of Compliance and Consistency
This permit is subject to compliance with this application, site drawing and attached general and specific conditions. Any
violation of these terms may subject the permittee to a fine or criminal or civil action; and may cause the permit to become
null and void.
This permit must be on the project site and accessible to the permit officer when the project is inspected for compliance. The
applicant certifies by signing this permit that [)prior to undertaking any activities authorized by this permit, the applicant will
confer with appropriate local authorities to confirm that this project is consistent with the local land use plan and all local
ordinances, and 2) a written statement or certified mail return receipt has been obtained from the adjacent riparian
landowner(s) .
The State of North Carolina and the Division of Coastal Management, in issuing this permit under the best available
information and belief, certifythatthis project is consistentwith the North Carolina Coastal Management Program.
River Basin Rules Applicable To Your Project:
❑ Tar - Pamlico River Basin Buffer Rules ❑ Other:
❑ Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules
If indicated on front of permit, your project is subject to the Environmental Management Commission's Buffer Rules for the
River Basin checked above due to its location within that River Basin. These buffer rules are enforced by the NC Division of
Water Quality. Contact the Division of Water Quality at the Washington Regional Office (252-946-6481) or the Wilmington
Regional Office (910-796-7215) for more information on how to comply with these buffer rules.
Division of Coastal Management Offices
Raleigh Office Morehead City Headquarters
Mailing Address: 400 Commerce Ave
1638 Mail Service Center Morehead City, NC 28557
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638 252-808-2808/ 1-888-411COAST
Location: Fax: [phone]
2728 Capital Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
919-733-2293
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Carteret, Craven, Onslow -above
New River Inlet- and Pamlico Counties)
Elizabeth City District
1367 U.S. 17 South
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
252-264-3901
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Camden, Chowan, Currituck,
Dare, Gates, Pasquotank and Perquimans
Counties)
Washington District
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
252-946-6481
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Beaufort, Bertie, Hertford, Hyde,
Tyrrell and Washington Counties)
Wilmington District
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
910-796-7215
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Brunswick, New Hanover,
Onslow -below New River Inlet- and
Pender Counties)
Revised 08/09/06

Applicant:
Date: C, 6— l
Describe below the HABITAT disturbances for the application. All values should match the name, and units of measurement
found in your Habitat code sheet.
'11-;53' '; COAST .z fl" f:-% 10
TOTAL Sq. Ft.
FINAL Sq. Ft.
TOTAL Feet
FINAL Feet
(Applied for.
(Anticipated final
(Applied for.
(Anticipated final
DISTURB TYPE
Disturbance total
disturbance.
Disturbance
disturbance.
Habitat Name
Choose One
includes any
Excludes any
total includes
Excludes any
anticipated
restoration
any anticipated
restoration and/or
restoration or
and/or temp
restoration or
temp impact
temp impacts)
impact amount)
ternp impacts)
amount
t ,
o n W `
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other B--
3116 0
Ld--t-t
Dredge ❑ Fill [Both ❑ Other ❑
'
t,✓zi� �Q
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other 19
r
3
I J 4
Dredge [T Fill E]Both ElOther El1�
Dredge E]Fill [IBoth [Other ❑
yt
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
'11-;53' '; COAST .z fl" f:-% 10

UNITED STATE'
• Sender Please print your name, address, and ZlP+4 Tn this box •
C'ta
20
Ivc z7EEB 21 R
�3�
Ilil!it I!did III lilt Id I11£11£{
UNITED STATES POS ' � .a;'.4"t
TP���I�'�C
• Sender: Please print your name, addrandPZMW. this box •
AM
Y 8 FEB 2011
�G ADO. c
t13> A -z rPo r�- tr� vc,
, Mc a- 0i
11111 1!II All !1 IF71,1111hilhFiti: lilt 121 i 111F3llisi i
UNITED $TATES'IiAf `'ti'�-
,•,
• Sender. Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
�'►�: � rte,,
30 4(7 NJC-
t j C- FEB
Gi 2� 3 2011
ar"�
f`1SorcnecdeCFP/D
IFFIFP1FFilf�fi?FFiF�lt?fFt?Fi}iF�iFSiF�fffflF£i£Fifl'.£££�lFf�
r

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
V-0. Goy 3
A. Signature
X 11 Agent
❑ Addressee
B. R ri Na C. D to of elive
i Y a � ��,�� �t � ry
D. Is delivery address different from item 1 ? `❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address elo 11No
3. Service Type
VCertifled Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Articfe ansferurom 7009 2250 0001 3691 2397
(transfer from service 1a6e1,
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
,jem 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
4-7
^--SJ�zl VA �-3L�3D-
A.Sig a re / � �
X ❑ Agent
�> I "1 ❑ Addressee
B. eceived b ( Printed _me) C.7Da a of Delivery
n�
D. Is delivery ad ress different fromitem 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Se ice Type
Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2, Article Number 7010 3090 0003 1303 7205
(transfer from service label —
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
UW A pi' [powV
P.O-. e5ox �22
A.�,'i nature
X Agent
Addressee
B, R i by (Printed Name) C. ate of Delivery
/ J"�
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? 0 Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: V, No
3, Service Type
? u VL I v Certified Mail
❑ Registered
0 Insured Mail
2. Article Number
(IFansfer from service labeq
0 Express Mail
0 Return Receipt for Merchandise
0 C.O.D.
4, Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes
7010 3090 0003 1303 7199
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540

a
o
00
0
H
U
See Suet 1-A For Index of Suets
E TO POWELLSVILLE
L- STA. 13 + 00.00
BEGIN TIP PRO
-L- STA. 13 + 65.00
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
HERTFORD
COUNTY
LOCATION: REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE NO. 12 AND BRIDGE NO. 25
OVER AHOSKIE CREEK ON US 13INC 42
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING AND STRUCTURES
%D1I w. Ir>�/IA�II`/►/:I �1: I� � �% � I ✓: [I�I►A`J
END BRIDGE
STA. 33 + 00.00
erwn nwn Paaacr R61Y.NL1 NP °Baer TOTAL
NP &fa6'la
N.C.1B-5018 1
rrwn ntoL NP r. w.ntoL NO oYL11rnDN
41730.3.ST7 STM -0013(29) PE, WW, UTIL
& CONST.
SANFORM 628 ROCKY
ORD, NCC2HURC
3 2H RD.
t
FEB 2 3 2011' , �
t
morel fetidcsjr1)Gf�2
GRAPHIC SCALES
DESIGN DATA
PROJECT LENGTH
Prepared jor Sanford Contractors
`r��,� in the Ce °f
ETHERILL 59 BSc rtieoe'�IN Rom
HYDRAULICS ENGINES
/
N GARR"f
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
0 50 100
ADT 2009 = 7145,,;°,ag;;
_PRELIMINARYLENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-5018 = 0.313 MILES
�Y,Y
ENGINEERING25
rm; sire 1Bim
°o Nor UaR POR C°N
1
ft
1006 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
PLANS
DHV = 10 %
X
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
LENGTH STRUCTURES TIP PROJECT B-5018 = 0.053 MILES
EDWARD G. WETHERILL, PE
SIGNATURE: S,-P+"`�f
"•'
PROJECT ENGINEER
BOB A. MAY, PE
ROADWAY DESIGN tiH Own
CAR011
ENGINEER 2�4�F tssL N9
5,0 25 0 50 100
1
D 50 %
% *
V = 60 MPH
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT B-5018 = 0.366 MILES
NOVEMBU 3, 2009
a
'of
LETTING DATE.
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
10 20
I
3.0% DUAL 1.0%
NOVEMBER 3, 2009
pRELIMINARY P S2 ttb
00 NOT USE POR MNSTRU O E
BOB IA Mph
SIGNATURE. MyM
PE
NCDOT CONTACT. • NILESH SURTI, PE
DESIGN -BUILD ENGINEER,AZ
PROFILE (VERTICAL)TTST
STATE HIGHWAY DESIGN ENGINEER

PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
c J l I w _ w. n. Nc neoe
09 _ » ETHERILL �•�•NwF-017� B-5018 4
BEA L'f YY RA� ,INC. A- a ENGINEERING e.. 719.1 eon
_i S %`.INC. l B9 "Y�I .� r.. viv es mw
S j (- F t A. _lO .T, - ,� R� b2B ROCKY FORK CHURCH RD. RAV SHEET NO.
C y SANFORD, NC 27332
+ /) S�n Q ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
V � {- iRAYSPONrAi,p PIAYN/GWpESR:Y - 9PX.GE/STNLCfuRE /1E5Ria' ENGINEER ENGINEER
Lo T WN OF/POWEst' SVILLE m 60 ?0 ' 3 CNN/S/TE DES6N - &S/OPS - m•STA,CTVN OBSEA'ATOY
• p�N CARO,/ �H CAROB
BEGIN TIP PROJECT 8-501$ e YFESs/o,
-L- STA. 13 + 65.00 e r O'
x
HEAsLEv PAWS.PLAN
Go S N U 993
,,WETLAND `IMPACTS DRAWINGS M
BOB A M�� 4X
APPROX LEGATION '
TITBtuOBTAINED BY OTHERS) " SIT,E I& SITE 11
PERMANENT SHEET PIUNG CAVA BUFFER'
BEG/N EXPR SSWAY GUTTER a -L� q,/g�OO Ex AY GU17` ��+' 75 (SEE STRUjrTURE PANS FOR LOCATION! BEGIN
-+ -L- Sffi5 5.00 TOS O
TON .?, - — c i r ! / SHOULDER BERM GOITER
\ ! t - STA. -L- 23+64.25 LT.
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION �� /. . a". Rip ` / 3 TONT $r !PRE OSP a' E+t FND t SITE 11
-L- STA/3+00.87 + - - \ \ / CL.
BIS
X ! SIT 11 SHOULDER BERM GUTTER*
'9 F FABRIC CYIOIL !//o/LPLJE—
E
, Lfi
m A'G.,,,r FsB.TER ! P ■ L 23+77.00
g 9 � VAT - - NE iLAIO
-
h
- - -
Pu UES
' Pl1E �- PU G PUROTE $TA LTON\t W �'_:.•.{i •_ _ t - , _ _ 4 - _
Cf
BUFFER - - - - N O
_ _ 4; a = T—U- _ i - Ba ocE • Iz — — _ - �/G 'moi W O+
•, GI aBLES
x .
C
350
r �— .i W
TO;p;E S E .:. REMOVE , 2GI H10
N 36 50' 34T W o m -L- - -
Is 13 un «,zaem
/—REMOVE 18 2GI T' I 2GI Lu
GRAU 'S
x7q,F r'
09
ejh p�q I - 0 5 ,x,'';- Ems% CONC 09 _ E e I \ • ■ t. • . J
Y� - \ Y- r BEGIN EXPRESSWAY GUTTER q rg 15' CAAP WEIR w0o05 `` N ' t t
4s -L- STA13+65D0 0_ \l' a 3 TONS .[TUNo
II O I W/ROD 8 LUG \� SPECIAL CUT DUCH CL. B RIP RAP I - _ • ! t
CONNECTION a SEE DETML A 11 SY FILTER V t ■
POT 5+00.00 %I r' c FAeluc
To
i
p I��O. e RAP SITE
�� % �� R AfABSy
CLTER A, '..I I • BEGIN
I SHOULDER BERM GUTTER
i e ' STA. -L- 23 r 64.25 RT.
END EXP RESSWA,
GUTTER
Z \
J _ CAYA BUFFER
m0 Z %I • �d ` e ti e a Y a `$ I r I� O
UTILIZE 4" DECK DRAINS 6' O.C.
FROM STA 23+04 TO
X51, S h GHLAND M,�MORIAL c�aRT,�Eh- _ STA 23+34 -L- LT AND RT
J ( a ( y E5
> 3e E F OENDMETL ANbL IN
as
6
0
a = 09 '� CAVA BUFFER�-'�.. v DE CLEARINGND
„ 09 a a•. / - ..
y1>
BEGIN GRADE N GRADE —L — STA /7 + 5.00
I
—1 - -- ELEV. = 41.75
60
P
I 19+44A0 60
_ = 3/SD Pl = 25+7150
= 420' EL = 265T
//5 VC = 180'
50 ErTy��AC = 55mph K = 171 50
EXIST.BUR/ED TEL "' wi OS = )60mph
d d
�q _ -L- 22%'
FE EXISF. T D i 2rcoreja°saB 8TI0ye 1
40 PROPOSED I-4/NNERDUCT PROPOSED GRADE S". 40
40
FOR TEL/F
BEGIN RESURFACING O CABLE PROPOSED GRADE
-L- STA 13+6500 DIRECTIONAL BORE (+10.3001%
30 ¢ % (-)0.85007 / EKCAVAT ON \ 30
L 20 / I I I I I 20
J _� r -_
E
BEGIN BRIDGE END BRIDGE LmNG GROUND
-L- STA 21f -L- STA23+4025 BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA PO; P. e'NWLi1---
`•' I I I ^ f
PROP.SBG.
�- - - - 2 20'9 i - -
FROTE N
10 DESIGN DISCHARGE = 6307/5/05 CFS I T 10
m DESIGN FREQUENCY = 50 YRS
N I GII ��tfY
E TYPE 8-77 v TYPE B-77 DESIGN HW ELEVATION = 2l5 FT I I I I I
BASE DISCHARGE = 7545/5865 CFS
' a N N N BASE FREQUENCY = l00 YRS � i
" 0 _L o BASE HW ELEVATION = 225 FTIS
N M o N OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE = 8620/5868 CFS PERMANENT SHEET NG
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY= 200 YRS (SEE STRUCTURE FORLOCATRONL PROPOSED I-4/NNERDUCT
m-10 TYPE B-77 TYPE B 77 OVERTOPPING ELEVATION = 23.3 FT BY DIRECTIONACABLE
m
v (2O'-25' DEEP UNDER CREEK) -10
m BEGIN APPROACH SLAB END APPROACH DATE OF SURVEY =APRIL 2009
m -L- STA 23+64.25 W.S. ELEVATION SEE S -1 THRU S- FOR STRUCTURE PLANS
m
-20 -L-_STA 2/+48J5- ------ AT-OAT-E...OF--SURVEY....=.1450- - -FT-------------------------------------------------------------- — -20
SKETCH SHOWING BRIDGE/PAVEMENT RELATIONSHIP SEE SHT. 2-A FOR DETAIL FOR REINFORCED FILL
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

• ss9 f f�.u'. w. s4. "I PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
4 ; PI SIG 3/+2252 ETHERILL "�'vf9 es W-"7 B-5018 5
ENGINEERING F. 919 e5i
-BL- BI -19 628 ROCKY fORK CHURCH RD.RAV SHEET NO.
O� SANFORD, NC 27332 Q = 17"21'45Z(RT)
N ' -L- STA. 28+28.6010,
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
OFF. 19.58' RT. O D = 201'IST V7w.wsmerergN 1•uwwlAG/OES.GN - ewatE/sT1LCTaRE aEswRw ENGINEER ENGINEER
9OVw SITE DESGI - GrIWS - DaVSrfiWrCN OBSEMArON
+ T = 432.87' H CAROCARre'7 SE =2035.00' /FT r°poFcss/pFssq�� 9 I
WETLAND IMPACTS DRAWINGS
OS = 60 MPHB@ELI I PLAkiS
SITE'S I, II & SITE III II, N -021993
(APPROX. LOCATION BNM16 ELEVATION - 17.04'
B08 A 19 bqA, S P`yVG
TO BE OBTAINED B/ OTHERS) N 914915 E 2604917
BL STATION2383 69 LEFT O QYl
PROP. 4' c R/R SPIKE IN 16 IN OAK
SITE II o�
• t PROTECTION • rY� tO "
• • R • • .. t r • Y e
F—• •
WO .. • • • Q
O � SITE III �•
W ti
a ,, •
`0•
20 —
W N ;7;= t
14)
2G 2GI �� - w a ` ` �• ....
Z Q \ G \
V� • i--__ FRAU L J F c N • • •
I 15' CAAP r% y O rr' —"� ,` ��
NLROD 8 lllG • �.. - �r- °" _ �, \ •
CONNECTION • /Q 1 r (•
• - EXCAVATION 0 • F
• SITE I EXCAVATION • • ' N\ °S�� -y
2 TONS wE rLAND .D^L \� i l.._ __
CL. B RIP RAP
7 SY FILTER
FABRIC
EgSS H017•i;'. 'DPFL AND, 11'. n
F F DENOWETLANbL IN
NOTE: NTESq/ a a
BRIDGE DECK DRAINS WILL NOT BE REQUIRED ON THIS BRIDGE . ®YDECQEARINGNO
NM914915 16 ELEEA26004917'''04 SEE SHT.2-A FOR DETAIL FOR REINFORCED FILL
BL STATION 23.83 69 LEFTN RA - - T f ,-_
R/R SPIKE IN 16 IN OAK V
L . = 21'.06 60 SEE SHT. S-_ THRU S-_ FOR STRUCTURE PLANS 60
PI = 25+7/50 PI = 30+4/B9
EL = 2657' EL = 2798 I
VC = 180' VC = 165. { f
50 K =-157 K =-223 I I 1__ 50
DS — JG6Omph OS )55mph FE fx RTO �— -----' I ...
ct
x _L
L-._ -- - — . _ .__
40 x . ! 1"E 2� 3 011 40
-- - - -- �-
PROPOSED GRADE - -
30MO-50017 (-)0.44022 -- T__ . 30
r+,b,3001�
------ ---------r— ----------- ----------------- i
T — Exr5T.6URIE0 TEL
20 1 1 I BEGIN APPROACH SLAB END APPROACH SLAB 20
a, EX)STiNG GROUND I I I —L— STA28+37.7/ —L— STA29+98JO
_ EXCAVATION BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA
EXCAVATIONS 1 I
10 pgpD F I I I I I pHDFiDSEI� rY
TT__�(( O� I 1 1 1 �Fp+ K DESIGN DISCHARGE = 6307/1202 CFS q VAR 0 4'-0" 10
firurac�4Y DESIGN FREQUENCY = 50 YRS TYPE B-77 TYPE B-77
DESIGN HW ELEVATION = 215 FT
E
v BASE DISCHARGE = 7545/1680 CFS N b
g BASE FREQUENCY = 100 YRS PROP. SBG.
0 BASE HW ELEVATION = 225 FT N N v 0
SEE ST
PERMANE REE PLAN�OR LOCATION) OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE = 8620/2752 CFS
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY= 200 YRS TYPE B-77 VAR TYPE B-77
= OVERTOPPING ELEVATION = 23.3 FT
—10 4'-3'TO 4'—l0" —10
m
AA
DATE OF SURVEY =APRIL 2009 BEGIN BRIDGE END BRIDGE
mWS.ELEVATION —L— STA28+61.69 —L— STA29+74JI
-20 rm EKl= 1450 FT -20
am AT DATE OF SURVEY
om
SKETCH SHOWING BRIDGE/PAVEMENT RELATIONSHIP
Qm
26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36

PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
B-5018 5
Pl S►a 31+2252 ENGINEERING nv .11 .11
m 4 -BL- BL19 e2e RocKr FORK CHURCH RD. A • fm. °ry es moT RAV SHEET NO.
O +�. SANF00.D, NC 27332 Q = I% 2I' 452' (RTI '
N -L- STA. 28+28.60 ti q�
OFF. 19.58' RT, oo D = 829J'157' ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
SA TRANSPp9TAT,p PlwMlll:/0.�Sp - d0'OG(/STpK-IWK gESp ENGINEER ENGINEER
O 'F CN&ISIFE DES" - GIS/CPS - COVSTMATON OBSEWOON !
ITN
V O R = 2.835.00'�0�� CAkO//H �N CAIjO�
M SE = OD45 FTIFT WETLAND IMPACTS DRAWINGS pFESS/pk , pecssq� .2 x
DS = 60 MPH I I A LANS 9
SITE'S I, II & SITE III zI at" ° '° " —02-3993
E
(APPROX. LOCATION RN16 ELEVAT IDN - 17.04• BOB AMNO �4,r S.pa\�
TO BE OBTAINED BY OTHERS) N 9 149 15
E 2604917 O �(O
BL STATION 2383 69 LEFT 0
R/R SPIKE IN 16 IN OAK O x
PROP. 4'
SITE II 5 OPE In
a A PROTECTION a cl) ,O Q
• Y
UJI
Lu 0
•
0
"' oF SITE III ALLI
�i
04!
lJJ 2G 2G1
Z _ GFA, 35p \ \
Lq
2 I R F - -` \4s •
V I 15" CARP 350 '� =� \ • • •
p _` \ `• — /
CONNECTION • TT � � � ! •
• EXCAVATION—
• SITE I a EXCAVATION \
2 TONS WEiL AryD .D. ..a..:.\ ` ` `� 2 29857
CL. B RIP RA
FABC
7 SY FILTER
RI
_ O
F F DENCTFtLANbL IN
NOTE: ® DE�?J%NIIOFND
BRIDGE DECK DRAINS WILL NOT BE REQUIRED ON THIS BRIDGE
RM16 ELEVATION 17.04'
RL1.4115 N 23.83TAT.26949EFT N RA — — TA f SEE SHT. 2—A FOR DETAIL FOR REINFORCED FILL
R/R SPIKE IN 16 IN OAK V. = 2(.06 SEE SHT. S— THRU S— FOR STRUCTURE PLANS
60 — — 60
PI = 25+7150 P1= 30+41.69
EL = 2657' EL = 2798'
VC = 180' VC = 165'
50 K=157 K=223
DS = >60mph DS = >55mpll 50
E EXIST. TO :j;:IT -�
{IB
I.
40 2rTol �'dp' 40
k.
r
PROPOSED GRADE .-
30 30
r+J03001� (+0"30017 (-)0.44027
---------r-----r—-------- — -----------------
"' T — fxLST.6upE0 TEL
E 20 I I
£xlsTlxG GROUND I I BEGIN APPROACH SLAB END APPROACH SLAB 20
a / I
-L*BEGIN
-L- STA29+98.10
/ EXC4VA„ON BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA
EXuve,roN/ I I I I
F5 10 Pwoi4�Fo I I I i -*�p DESIGN DISCHARGE = 6307/1202 CFSAR.
m m ipr� 1 �Ip�K DESIGN FREQUENCY = 50 YRS7' TO 4'-0' 10
E
DESIGN HW ELEVATION = 215 FT TYPE B 77
BASE DISCHARGE = 7545/1680 CFS0 BASE Ln
FREQUENCY = 100 YRS ROP. SBGo 0
PERVANE SHEET PIUNG BASE HW ELEVATION = 225 FT (SEE ST R£ PLANS FOR LOCATOW OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE = 8620/2752 CFS
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY= 200 YRS VAR TYPE B-77
—10OVERTOPPING ELEVATION = 233 FT3'TO 4'-l0” —10
DATE OF SURVEY = APRIL 2009 END BRIDGE
`°WS.ELEVATION -L- STA.28+61,69 -L- STA.29+74JI
m -20 Fes' AT DATE OF SURVEY = 14.50 FT -2O
m
SKETCH SHOWING BRIDGE/PAVEMENT RELATIONSHIP
26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36

m
0
0 0
a�=
00
NOS
°OQ.N
See Sheet f A For Index of Sleets
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
..�.......�,b "a �.
•C. B-5018 1
.4�d ,22]
Co Nph,.- - lluaeln y
DIVISION OFHIGlH[WAYS
13 1423
AHOSKIE Rd T— Rd
41730.3.511 STM -0013(29) PE R/W UT1L
'• "'"""3
- — -- -----
rf< CONST.
-0 ,
1, y
RZ 1... 1422
-
HERTFORD COUNTY
HG
--- D
1422
----
lim,� `;'
LOCATION: REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE N0.12 AND BRIDGE N0.25
lir
' 1
y _ NCDO�PORa PROJECT
OVER AHOSKIE CREEK ON US 13INC 42
628 ROCKY FORK CHURCH RD.
SANFORD SANFORD, NC 27332
r ,ne
a
-
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING AND STRUCTURES
y 1101
--,_Nevow -- _ -- ----4�w
DESIGN BUILD SUBMITTAL #: S-016
13
321
SUBMITTAL DATE: 1/142011
tear x7 T—
u
'
�'-:
RFC PLANS
ti
1215
v
OO�
VICINITY MAP
OFF-SITE DETOUR
r♦-��-
END BRIDGE
-L- STA. 23+40.25
BEGIN BRIDGE ® BEGIN BRIDGE O
-L- STA. 21+71.75 L- STA. 28+61.69
7 �
END BRIDGE
I L- STA. 29+74.11
TO POWELLSVILLE
)
-U US 13�NC 41
zzzzz
- "OSKIE CREEK
`V
in
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION ; -
-L- STA. 13 + 00.00
OVERFLOW
u
FEB 2 3 2011
.$
END CONSTRUCTION
N
BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-5018
END TIP PROJECT B-5018
V
L— STA. 13 + 65.00
—L— STA. 33 + 00.00
PRELIMINARY PLANS
0o Nar m Fal C°NVMtXTWN
V
GRAPHIC SCALES
DESIGN DATA
PROJECT LENGTH/
Prepared for Sanford Conaacto
i^ rAe offl" of
HYDRAULICS ENG
SN CARO
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
ETHERILL f°011`OO
Q'FSs�i
v
50 25 0 50 100
�>u
ADT 2009 = 7145
ADT 2035 = 11600
LENGTH
ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-5018 = 0.313 MILES
ENGINEERING
1- "W a'
2�
S E A L
023993
oofF9
�
11 +o
PLANS
2MSrAAWuM SPBWW+Moxs
DHV = 10 %
LENGTH
STRUCTURES TIP PROJECT B-5018 = 0.053 MILES
EDWARD -C Q,�VETrIERILL, PE
x S.eR�c
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
50 25 0 50 loo
■ ���� '
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
D = 50 %
T = 4 % '
TOTAL LENGTH
TIP PROJECT B-5018 = 0.366 MILES
NOVEMBER 3, 2009
P1tolscrmmmozaR
BOB A. MAY, PE
ol77-1•
ROADWAY DESIGN o uto'�'A.�
ENGINEER c ra`o`SEAL + a
o `
LE777NG DATE.
O10
5 0 10 20
V = 60 MPH
NOVEMBER 3,- 2009
g zme
ffiP0°�11
NCDOT CONTACT: NILESH SURTI PE
n
pa
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
• TTST 3.0% DUAL 1.0%
sou s tr 10S
sre�rvca�Fer

Note: Not to Scale
*S. U.E. = Subsurface Utility Engineering
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
CONVENTIONAL PLAN SHEET SYMBOLS 1 RECEIVEC
BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY -
1 csy rn
State Line
—
County Line
Q
swna�
Township Line
is
City Line
— —
Reservation Line
— — -
Property Line
.
Existing Iron Pin
O
m
Property Corner
❑CO
Property Monument -
-----
Parcel/Sequence Number
iz3
Existing Fence Line
-x—x—
Proposed Woven Wire Fence
e -
Proposed Chain Link Fence
8
Proposed Barbed Wire Fence -
0 —
Existing Wetland Boundary
- - - --"-
Proposed Wetland Boundary --
R•
Existing Endangered Animal Boundary
"^—
Existing Endangered Plant Boundary
- - --
BUILDINGS AND AND OTHER CULTURE -
Gas Pump Vent or U/G Tank Cap
O
Sign
Proposed Temporary Utility Easement —
Well —
°
Small Mine
k
Foundation
ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES.
Area Outline
Cemetery ---
L
Building -
- - - - -
School
- F -
Church - - -- - - -
Dam
HYDROLOGY.-
1 csy rn
Stream or Body of Water
�s
Hydro, Pool or Reservoir
Q
swna�
Jurisdictional Stream
is
Buffer Zone 1
BZ 1
Buffer Zone 2
8z 2
Flow Arrow ---------- --
.
Disappearing Stream -- - -
----
Spring -
❑CO
Wetland
-----
Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch
- --
False Sump
•—
RAILROADS:
Standard Gauge
1 csy rn
RR Signal Milepost,
�s
Switch - --
Q
swna�
RR Abandoned - --- -- - -
CW *^
RR Dismantled
- - - -•- - -
RIGHT OF WAY.-
.0
Baseline Control Point
.
Existing Right of Way Marker
>—�
Existing Right of Way Line
❑CO
Proposed Right of Way Line
-----
Proposed Right of Way Line with
A
Iron Pin and Cap Marker
•—
Proposed Right of Way Line with
Concrete or Granite Marker
Existing Control of Access
Proposed Control of Access
5)Existing
Easement Line
Proposed Temporary Construction Easement
E
Proposed Temporary Drainage Easement
TDE
Proposed Permanent Drainage Easement
PDE
Proposed Permanent Utility Easement
rue
Proposed Temporary Utility Easement —
TUE
Proposed Permanent Easement with
Iron Pin and Cap Marker
ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES.
Existing Edge of Pavement
Existing Curb
--- -
Proposed Slope Stakes Cut
- - - - -
Proposed Slope Stakes Fill
- F -
Proposed Wheel Chair Ramp
Existing Metal Guardrail -- -
Proposed Guardrail
T
Existing Cable Guiderail
Proposed Cable Guiderail
a "
Equality Symbol
Pavement Removal -
VEGETATION.-
Single Tree -
Q
Single Shrub -
o
Hedge
~ ^"-•
Woods Line
"
Orchard
0 0 U Q
Vineyard
vineyaro
EXISTING STRUCTURES:
MAJOR:
O
Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert
cam- I
Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall
CW *^
MINOR:
- - - -•- - -
Head and End Wall
.0
Pipe Culvert
Footbridge
>—�
Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or 1B —
❑CO
Paved Ditch Gutter
-----
Storm Sewer Manhole
s0
Storm Sewer
•—
UTILITIES.
POWER:
Existing Power Pole
Proposed Power Pole
Existing Joint Use Pole
Proposed Joint Use Pole
Power Manhole -- -
Power Line Tower -
Power Transformer —
WG Power Cable Hand Hole
H -Frame Pole
Recorded U'G Power Line
Designated LLG Power Line (S.U.E.')
TELEPHONE:
Existing Telephone Pole
Proposed Telephone Pole
Telephone Manhole —
Telephone Booth
Telephone Pedestal
Telephone Cell Tower
USG Telephone Cable Hand Hole
Recorded WG Telephone Cable ----
Designated U/G Telephone Cable (S.U.E.•)
Recorded U/G Telephone Conduit
Designated WG Telephone Conduit (S.U.E.')
Recorded U/G Fiber Optics Cable —
Designated UG Fiber Optics Cable (S.U.E.')
TV:
TV Satellite Dish i
TV Pedestal
TV Tower
U,,G TV Cable Hand Hole
Recorded UG TV Cable ---- "--
Designated Ufi, TV Cable (S.U.E.') — - - - -"- - - -
Recorded USG Fiber Optic Cable "^s
Designated LkG Fiber Optic Cable (S.U.E.•) "'o - -
GAS:
WATER: FEB 2 3 2011
O
Water Manhole
1)
Water Meter wMoroi
o
Water Valve -- -
- - - -•- - -
Water Hydrant
.0
Recorded UG Water Line
A?G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
Designated G Water Line (S.U.E.') - -
U
- -•- - - -
Above Ground Water Line
A/G tater
TV:
TV Satellite Dish i
TV Pedestal
TV Tower
U,,G TV Cable Hand Hole
Recorded UG TV Cable ---- "--
Designated Ufi, TV Cable (S.U.E.') — - - - -"- - - -
Recorded USG Fiber Optic Cable "^s
Designated LkG Fiber Optic Cable (S.U.E.•) "'o - -
GAS:
Gas Valve
O
Gas Meter
1)
Recorded UeG Gas Line
-°
Designated UWG Gas Line (S.U.E.•)
- - - -•- - -
Above Ground Gas Line -
A/G Gas
SANITARY SEWER:
Sanitary Sewer Manhole
Sanitary Sewer Cleanout
U'Q+
G Sanitary Sewer Line
Above Ground Sanitary Sewer A/C 5-11-y Serer
Recorded SS Forced Main Line u
Designated SS Forced Main Line (S.U.E.') — - - - -•::- - - -
MISCELLANEOUS:
Utility Pole
0
Utility Pole with Base -
❑
Utility Located Object
O
Utility Traffic Signal Box
Utility Unknown U0G Line
xn
WG Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
A?G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
U,G Test Hole (S.U.E.')
Z.
Abandoned According to Utility Records
AATUR
End of Information
E.O.I.

C,
CL
V
m
CO
B
in
m
i
00
i
a
0
s
O
Ix
m
m
PROJECT RV004a NO. SHEET NO.
P A V E M E N T S C H E D U L E B-5018 2
ROADWAY DESIGN ►AVHABdT DESIGN
FINAL PAVEMENT DESIGN 04cp*m SIM
PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B25.08, yp�SI�G��1, 4"E1j�
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 114 LBS. PER SO. YD. PER 1" DEPTH. TO .��.
A VARIABLE DEPTH PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT (412" MIN.) E2 BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 3" IN DEPTH OR GREATER SEA
THAN 512" IN DEPTH. 11 13
'CMI GN
PROP. APPROX. 3' ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE S9.5B, vNu.vvN( yl �i%10
C1 AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 168 LBS. PER SO. YD. IN EACH OF TWO R1 CONCRETE EXPRESSWAY GUTTER 11
LAYERS.
PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE S9.5B,
SANFORD d� NC 3
C2 AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 112 LBS. PER SO. YD. PER 1" DEPTH. TO R2 SHOULDER BERM GUTTER
BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT TO EXCEED 2" IN DEPTH.
s!v it ri.ri, Its tui. ua
YYI.1� N C l]M!
ETIERILL �� U.r-osn
PROP. APPROX. 212" ASPHALT CONCRETE INTERMEDIATE COURSE, EN9INEERix9 •� "Its, 077
TYPE 119.08, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 285 LBS. PER S0. YD.
D1 T EARTH MATERIAL. 919m M7
7ANrPWATXM PLMNIACJiX.SYA' - 800WEISTAUMM DES+GN
CM19TE DES" - MSIWS - CONSMATOM OBSEAV01M
PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE INTERMEDIATE COURSE,
TYPE I19.OB, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 114 LBS. PER S0. YD. PER 1" C
D 2 U EXISTING PAVEMENT.
DEPTH, TO BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 212" IN DEPTH OR
GREATER THAN 4" IN DEPTH.
'- FEB 2 3 2011,
El PROP. APPROX. 4" ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE 825.08, W VARIABLE DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT (SEE STANDARD WEDGING DETAIL)
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 456 LBS. PER SO. YD. H�iEJf i�C9�^�l�
NOTE: PAVEMENT EDGE SLOPES ARE 1:1 UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE.
NOTE: TRANSITION FROM TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1 TO EXIST. PAVEMENT DI
-L. STA. 32-50.00 TO -L- STA. 33+00.00
8 T 1B' 4, s. °,...e }' 12 i, 12' -!= A q. -L-
VARIABLE
SEE X -SECTIONS
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1
USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1 AS FOLLOWS:
-L• BTA. 17+25.00 TO -L- BTA. 19+36.12
-L- STA. 23+76.17 TO -L- STA. 28-30.00
•L- STA. 30+05.00 TO -L- BTA. 32+50.00
rt. -L-
VARIABLE
SEE X -SECTIONS
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 3
USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 3 AS FOLLOWS:
-L- STA. 15+85.00 TO -L- STA. 17-25.00
PARTIAL TYPICAL
SECTION NO. 1
USE PARTIAL TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1 IN CONJUNCTION
WITH TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1 & 2 AS FOLLOWS:
-L- STA. 17+25.00 TO -L- STA- 18+00,00 LT.
-L- STA, 17+28,00 TO -L- BTA. 19+75.00 RT.
VARIABLE
SEE X_ SECTION
(B' w( GB 19' wi au -� 2Y2 { Ib 1.94 1
YIN. I U f Y1M
FDPS YIN. YIN.
Detail Showing
02 : Method of Wedging
e: T 611
T 7
D GRADE TO
at` THIS LINE
➢F�4x
VX-�°NO TYPICAL SECTION NO. 2 VARIABLE
USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 2 AS FOLLOWS: BEE x•sEcrtaNa
-L- STA. 19+36.12 TO -L- STA. 21+72.75 (BEGIN BRIDGE)
-L- BTA. 23+40.25 (END BRIDGE) TO •L- STA. 23+78.17
•L• STA. 28+30.00 YO -L- STA. 28+81.88 (BEGIN BRIDGE)
-L- STA. 24+74.11 (END BRIDGE) TO -L- STA. 30-05.00
rt -L-
/ VARIABLE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 4
SEE X -SECTIONS USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 4 AS FOLLOWS:
-L- STA. 21+72.75 TO -L- BTA. 23+40.25
PARTIAL TYPICAL
SECTION NO. 2
USE PARTIAL TYPICAL SECTION NO. 2 IN CONJUNCTION
WITH TYPICAL SECTION NO. 3 AS FOLLOWS:
-L- STA. 15+25.00 TO -L- STA. 17+25.00 LT.
•L• STA. 13-86.00 TO -L• STA. 17+25.00 RT.
L' _1
PARTIAL TYPICAL SECTION NO. 3
USE PARTIAL TYPICAL SECTION NO. 3 IN CONJUNCTION
WITH TYPICAL SECTION NOS. 1 & 2 AS FOLLOWS:
-L- STA. 23+64.25 TO -L- STA. 26+34.88 AT.
-L- BTA. 23+64.25 TO -L- STA. 23+77.00 LT.
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 5
USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 5 AS FOLLOWS:
-L- STA. 28+61.69 TO -L- STA. 29-74.11
cT � Dl
ii r
0
�I
PARTIAL TYPICAL SECTION NO, 4
USE IN CONJUNCTION WITH TYPICAL SECTIONS NO. 1 & 2
-L- STA.20+00.00 TO -L- STA. 21+72.75 AT.
-L- STA. 20+35.25 TO -L- STA. 21-72.75 LT.
-L- STA. 23+77.00 TO -L- STA. 28+54.85 LT.
-L- STA. 29+78.73 TO -L- STA. 32-78.73 LT.
-L- STA. 29+71.64 TO -L- STA. 31+09.14 AT.
I

EXISTING GROUND --
RECEIVE
FEB 2 3 2011
DETAIL FOR REINFORCED FILL
USE AS FOLLOWS:
-L- STA. 21+00.00 TO -L- STA. 21+72.75 RT.
-L- STA. 25+70.00 TO -L- STA. 28+67.00 LT.
-L- STA. 30+07.52 TO -L- STA. 32+15.00 LT.
MIOIER R911104CE NO. SHEET NO.
8-50/8 2-A
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
CARO,
ottss ipl,
I Ntt,
$�` �wr'"a`a'►`��il I bl 11
d'°SNK
27332
,,�
E 7MI R1MG M n9 esl�.On
E NOINEERIN(7 k.1. bI M7
TRAYSN?REffV* "-G/OESG - RMM/STR4CTURE OESCN
CMR/5?E DESX.M - &S/GPS - COVVAL r*V DBSERYATXW
I
I
1
I
1
I
1
1
i
I
1

m
m
O4 -BL- BLI9
-L- STA.28+28.60
'�wID T. MORSE OFF. 19.58'RT. O
DB 492, PG. 685 O
PC '. SL. 49-C +
O
Eh
4
Moo.PERMANEffF
SHEET
(SEE STRUCTURE PLANSOR LOCATION)
+
$
SLOPE
IRO
EXCAVATION
� 57.00
to
141E
LLJ
Lu
PUE
� P11E — c
Lu
I T T\
\
�_
-- —'
lL
2GI
Me
�-,-
� I � IS CAM � _ — —
— —
afra<LaR �
.��
TWROD a tHo
i< rrsv WATCH
ROWS
�
11EGVATION
4
2 TONS
END
SHOULDER
REAM
Q� TItr m
EARRIc
GTTER U
STA -1- 2R+34.36 RT.
4500
ssR s... n.4e.. IY sr IR4 PROJECT REf9@K! NO. SHEET NO.
"w`rsa's�n
8-50/8
629 ROCKY FORK CHURCH R0. P/ St0 3/+2252 Ep8I1 piNuO k m w Ron 5
swFo9o, NC 27332Q = %% Ll' 452' (RT) rs m RSI ow IEW SHEET NO.
D = T ROADWAY °ESLD" "r°RA
ZOY 15
rRMSRYV7AiKM H{MM6Ci0fSG' - fl0A'.E/ST/RKruRf CCSR71 ENDI ENGINEER ENGINEER
L = 859!0' �s B� n+4isnc crscx - VS/GPS- mrsrr9cno. a6unvapY
T = 43287' �� `\� tAt°N CAq
SE -0.0045 /FT �� ��osrssl oe, sso °<.9
DS = 60 MPH ` ,V`✓'` ' s L
le o�91�3
— 8NI6 ELEVATION • 17.04-A
N 914915 E 2604917
8L STATION23.83 69 LEFT O
RTA SPIKE IN 16 IN OAK DAVID T. MORSE O
DG 492, PG. 685 h
PC 1. SL. 49-C f
t
Y Q
Y 4 B
Y
��EX R
t ori .�� \
ft
END CONSTRUCTION ; 1 +0m
NORTON D.COPLLAND.JR. END TIP_ PROJECT B-5018 J O
OB 453. PO. 6333 /
OB 80. PG.3 —L— STA. 33+00.00 /
/ i NnaTnN n_ cnnFi eua .iR.
PECFIVO
FEB 2 3 2011 '
-i
j "p {�(6oi41ioc00�j 00M,

RAL WS024,11116/2010, P.1201011 01 06 01 B-50181Roadway\Xsckxsc_ew_volumes xis
NOTE: EMBANKMENT COLUMN DOES NOT INCLUDE BACKFILL FOR UNDERCUT
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
CROSS-SECTION SUMMARY
PROJ. REFERENCE NO. SHEEP NO.
e-5016 X -1A
Station
L
13+65.00
14+00.00
14+50.00
15+00.00
15+50.00
16+00.00
Uncl. Exc.
(cu. yd.)
0
8
24 _
25
20
13
Embt
(cu. yd.)
0
4
_ 9
8
9
6
. ` i
'Pt AW
v
Approximate quantities only. Unclassified excivatlon, borrow
excavation, shoulder borrow, fine grading, clearling and grubbing,
breaking of existing pavement and removal of existing pavement
will be paid for at the lump sum price for "Grading".
16+50.00
13
3
17+00.00
14
5
17+50.00
11
9
-- -
-- - --
18+00.00
5
28
18+50.00
4
31
- --- --
19+00.00
5
32
19+50.00
5
83
20+00.00
38
158
20+50.00
48
214
21+00.00
18
257
-
21+50.00
5
342
21+72.75
1 5
184
23+40.25
0
0
23+50.00
0
37
24+00.00
_ 0
121
24+50.00
0
42
25+00.00
0
25 _
25+50.00
1 1
17
28+00.00
1
36
28+50.00
2
54
28+89.68
2
49
27+00.00
1
17
27+50.00
2
102
28+00.00
1
120
28+50.00
1 1
123
28+61.89
1
29
29+74.11
0
0
30+00.00
0
68
30+50.00
0
143
31+00.00
0
144
31+50.00
0
128 _
--
32+00.00
0
115
32+50.00
4
61
33+00.00
4
8

C
Q
O
K
m
()
0
0
0
c0
B
M
B
l9
��;
Q/d
v B(V
w^�`�-°
o ;��
-a=:

5-10 rrta.REFEREN B-5018 SHEET NO.
i
6Q__
.I.
p/\

-a

N
m
C
0'
U
~'1•
[L
B
in
m
u
X
0
D
0
A
q
O
N
l0
SOB
C /Cv
N.m..���
O�L
p/�
a:=

C
P
U
4
K
B
m
m
X
0
0
O
2
m
B
.n
m
m
m
ms
��m
a�
��
o!�
-a:=

O�
'n.

I

0'
ri
N
m
t
C
O�
V
U
m
B
(1]
n
x
T
0
O
2
B
B
tD
m
am�
B
�B(V
M�
p/\
-a=

4
6
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
SeB S ee I -A Fo lMe+ o, S �s
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NC B-5018 Uo-1
UTILITIES BY OTHERS PLANS S
RECEIVED
00
HERTFORD COUNTY
APR 5 2011
"
LOCATION: REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE N0.12 AND BRIDGE N0.25
OVER AHOSKIE CREEK ON US 13INC 42
DCM-MHD CITY
TYPE OF WORK UTILITIES BY OTHERS RELOCATION
VICINITY
O)
C�
[�
SVY �MAMP
-�
Bnm BRIDGE
b— STA. 23+WZ
RECID BRIDGE O
'-E
BEGIN BRIDGE
-Ir STA 2I+775 UO -2 -L- STA 28+6L69 UO -3
II END BRIDGE®
-L- ST,211+ I
y
PONTu mu
C 42
-L- US 13INTO
BRIDGE' 12
iII
-a
BRIDG�O
CONSTRU N
L— STA. 13 00.00
J� I
CREEK
OOWBEGIN
O,p
+
M
O
BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-5018
END TIP PROJECT B-5018
V
L— STA. 13 + 65.00
U STA. 33 + 00.00
GRAPHIC SCALES
I E Q 50 Joporgy
OP SEEM
V79M MIMS ON PROIECI
s5s orva Rod] N NYN
51111[ IM rPrepared
by �sro��ssl�eo5" "cl^"w
v: Nv es mm
� OP ID(Y(MAYS
SHEET N0. DESCRIPTION
Il 00N/N10N NORTH CAROLINA PONER
ETHENILL
ENOINEERINO
,
'Q iS.r�
RANS'
SO 1Q0
(HORIZONTAL)
UO-/ T?LC SHEET
UO -2 THRU UO -3 UTILITIES BY OTHERS
PLAN SHEETS
(POWERIDISTR/BUTION)
2)CENTURYLINK (TELEPHONE)
).x.emu�.� umnY ec5orr
A�
.
OPRORIE
1� 15 4 10 20
— cooxnrt — LNTwY PNlt12AR
^ • B.N nrwrr AG®VI
Vfr
ld� NIIm ,Srr�S'i
PROFILE (VERTICAL(

a
BEASLEY FARMS, INC.
DB 344, PG. 154 (BERTIE CO.)
1
O
O
O
PB 3, PG. 82 (BERTIE CO.)
BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-5018
UTILITIES BY OTHERS
�
TOWN OF POWELLSVILLE
ALL PROPOSED UTILITY WORK
t
I( * WETLAND •C'
DB 453, PG. 734
-L- STA. 13 + 65.00
BE DONE BY OTHERS
WOODS
c�
m _
}
T
t
WETLAND 13
R
..
.. .. .. .. .. .. ..
\
El ILLEREMOVE
OS 13 AND AC 42 (28'BST)
-T I P T Eo_
1
1 DST OR
I
g5
I
POT 5+00.00
RECEIVED
a
n
0
APR 5 2011
m
m
m
DCM-MHD CITY
m
T
O
HIGHLAND MEMORIAL GARDENS, INC.
DB 490, PG. 209
DB 285. PG. 371
DB 519. PG. 551
1
+ SANFORD
O O
P N
OBEASLEY FARMS, INC.
OB 344, PG. 154 (BERTIE CO.) DAVID T. PG. 68E
PB 3, PG. 82 (BERTIE CO.) PC 6 SL. 49-C
PROJECT REFERENCE N0, SHEET N0.
B-5018 I UO -2
UTILITIES BY OTHERS
�
NOTE:
ALL PROPOSED UTILITY WORK
t
I( * WETLAND •C'
SHOWN ON THIS SHEET WILL
?pO
BE DONE BY OTHERS
1
+ SANFORD
O O
P N
OBEASLEY FARMS, INC.
OB 344, PG. 154 (BERTIE CO.) DAVID T. PG. 68E
PB 3, PG. 82 (BERTIE CO.) PC 6 SL. 49-C
xUTE. iIEAEm1GWAI-NISRENDRTRNLT
2
T
Y
O
HORTON D. COPELAND. JR.
DB 458, PG 774
DB 80, PG. 633
NORMAL
WATER
R LEVEL
EL145+/-
* A
�
t
I( * WETLAND •C'
a
WOODS
t
` t *� t /
m _
t
t
WETLAND 13
M
..
.. .. .. .. .. .. ..
\
.. -.
Y m P
pis
PUS .
F
00
�Z �iCL]
y' y
0_�—.�
WN lEt �� Na
oNn lvu
• W
A�
vB —
O
bOc
C
M. \
EN.
TES
O
v farm Am
— — —
gyp-
60.DGE•N2
/
uj
+
W
0 —L—
2G1
N N
REMOVE 18'
2G1
El I2GI
ON
—39
_20— _—_�
W
S. CAU
----------------
az.• Wo
i R
PD \ REMOVE
E
eo
EX CONC.
C t
t
15' CARP
+P"'
WeR WOODS
m e f
t *
wETLnNo<
VN(OD b LUG
CONNECTION
�o
SPECIAL CUT DITCHI
SEE DETAIL A
I f
t E t
xUTE. iIEAEm1GWAI-NISRENDRTRNLT
2
T
Y
O
HORTON D. COPELAND. JR.
DB 458, PG 774
DB 80, PG. 633
NORMAL
WATER
R LEVEL
EL145+/-

Ir
FE'CEIVE®Am
FEB 2 3 2011
CAMA & 404/401 PERMIT APPLICATION morehead fy0CM
PROJECT: B-5018
COUNTY: HERTFORD
DESCRIPTION: Replacement of Bridges #12 and #25 over Ahoskie Creek (Swamp)
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
1
Cover Letter
2
DCM MP -1 Form
3
DCM MP -5 Form — Bridge #12
4
DCM MP -5 Form — Bridge #25
5
Pre -Construction Notification Form
6
Stormwater Management Permit Application Form
7
NCEEP Acceptance Letter
8
USACE Jurisdictional Determination
9
Landowner Notification Letters
10
Permit Impact Plan Set & Impact Summary

e . wart s
:- RECEIVED
FEB 2 3 2011
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
moraecdcUrI)CM
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE EUGENE A. CONTI, JR.
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
February 3, 2011
Stephen Lane
Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
Dear Mr. Lane,
The NCDOT requests the issuance of a CAMA General Permit 2300 for the
replacement of Bridges #12 and 25 in Hertford County, NC, along with General Permit
1600 for associated relocation of overhead power lines and directional boring of fiber
optic lines under Ahoskie Creek and associated wetlands. This project is included in the
Federal Stimulus Program associated with the ARRA (America Recovery and
Reinvestment Act). The bridges are located on US 13/NC 42 approximately 2.8 miles
south of Ahoskie. Bridge #12 spans Ahoskie Creek, which is a tributary that flows to the
Chowan River approximately 17.0 miles downstream. Bridge #25 spans a floodplain
overflow in Ahoskie Swamp. The Division of Water Quality classifies Ahoskie Creek
(Ahoskie Swamp/Bear Swamp) as Class "C", "NSW" waters, and it is also designated an
anadromous fish spawning area by the Wildlife Resource Commission.
The existing Bridge # 12 has a reinforced concrete floor on timber, joist timber end bents,
and timber piles with steel crutch bents at interior bents. Bridge # 12 is 120 ft. long by 28
ft. wide. Existing Bridge # 25 has a reinforced concrete floor on timber, joist end bents,
and timber piles with steel crutch bents at interior bent 2. Bridge # 25 is 70 ft. long by
28.2 ft. wide.
Both structures will be removed using NCDOT's guidelines for bridge removal, which
will prevent material from being dropped into the stream. The proposed bridges will be
replaced on the existing alignment. The new bridge structures will be constructed as
follows. Bridge # 12 will be 167.5 ft. in length by 36 ft. wide and built with a cored slab
concrete deck, a vertical steel sheeting abutment on the south end and a spill through
abutment on the north end. Bridge # 25 will be 112.4 ft. in length by 36.0 ft. wide and
built with a cored slab concrete deck, a vertical steel sheeting abutment on the south end
and a spill through abutment on the north end.
113 Airport Dr., Suite 100, Edenton, NC 27932 — Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

The bridge roadway approaches will have to be reconstructed to meet current design
standards. The roadway grade at the southern end of Bridge # 12 will be raised
approximately 3.5 feet to allow for the vertical curve south of the bridge. The roadway
grade will be raised approximately 1.2 feet at the north end of Bridge # 25 to tie in the
proposed grade with the existing roadway. These roadway changes will result in some
widening of the shoulders, which will permanently impact 2,020 sq. ft. (0.05 acre) of
riverine wetlands. In addition, 0.21 acre of wetland will be cleared for roadside
maintenance and for overhead utility line relocation required for construction. This
acreage does not include the area already cleared for the existing power line easement
adjacent to the roadway. These impacts will be mitigated through a combination of on-
site wetland restoration and in -lieu fee payment. Wetland restoration will be performed
through the removal of 0.01 acre of old approach fill under Bridge #12, grading the
restored area to match adjacent wetland elevations, and seeding according to current
NCDOT on-site mitigation specifications. The remaining 0.04 acre of impact from fill
will be mitigated through requesting 0.08 acre of riverine wetland restoration through the
EEP. The additional 0.21 acre of clearing for utility and roadside maintenance will be
mitigated through requesting 0.21 acre of riverine wetland restoration from EEP. Total
required mitigation from EEP will be 0.29 acre. An off-site detour will be utilized to
detour traffic around the project area.
The original proposal for this project included lengthening the primary structure (Bridge
#12) to approximately 300 feet and replacing the overflow structure (Bridge #25) with a
box culvert. Upon completion of the hydraulic and flood modeling analysis, it was
determined that significant flow is directed toward the overflow structure during flood
events. Therefore, the replacement of both bridges as proposed would better serve to pass
flood waters with minimal impact to the environment and future roadway. Bridge #25
has been lengthened and designed with a skew angle to improve flood passage. Bridge
#12 has been lengthened to provide additional flood passage along Ahoskie Creek, and
allow for restoration of wetlands under the north side of the bridge. Ahoskie Creek is
channelized through out the project area, upstream and downstream, which decreases the
effectiveness of one longer structure and makes the proposed dual bridge project more
effective in passing flood waters.
Stormwater improvements have also been designed as part of this project, although little
additional impervious surface will be constructed. The existing concrete ditches on the
south end of the project currently discharge in close proximity to Ahoskie Creek down the
steep southern approach. The proposed design routes most of the stormwater from the
east to the west side of the road and outlets into an existing ditch at Station 18+00. The
stormwater then flows through approximately 250 feet of upland prior to discharge into
the wetlands associated with Ahoskie Creek. This provides treatment of stormwater
runoff prior to discharge. The remaining stormwater from a greatly reduced drainage area
along the roadway is discharged into uplands adjacent to Ahoskie Creek.
Stormwater between the bridges will be collected and discharged at non-erosive velocities
at Station 26+25. This outlet was originally considered at the small upland area to the
north. However, this upland area is adjacent to the open water scour hole of the ove
channel. Therefore, the outlet was moved further from the scour h ptv
EB 2 3 2011
113 Airport Dr., Suite 100, Edenton, NC 27932 — Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

1
increased protection and stability. Deck drains, currently discharging both to Ahoskie
Creek and the overflow channel, will be eliminated over surface water. The northernmost
30 feet of Bridge #12 requires deck drains to avoid potential hydroplaning as a result of
water spreading into the travel lanes. The proposed deck drains will discharge directly
into wetland areas under the north side of Bridge #12, replacing the current drains that
discharge directly into the surface water. A collection system was considered for this
bridge but it was determined that deck drains with minimal discharge would be preferred
to a larger concentrated direct discharge into wetlands adjacent to Ahoskie Creek. Deck
drains have been eliminated on Bridge #25.
Based on our review of the proposed design and construction methods, this project is
eligible for consideration under General Permits 2300 and 1600. Included with this letter
are the forms MP -1 and MP -5, adjacent landowner notices, permit drawings, and location
map. A pre -construction notification for Clean Water Act Section 401/404 review is also
included for the US Army Corps of Engineers and the NC Division of Water Quality
review. Return receipts for the adjacent landowner notices will be forwarded upon
receipt. Authorization to debit the $400 Permit Application Fee from WBS Element
41730.3.ST1 is hereby given. If you have questions please do not hesitate to call me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Jerry Jennings, P.E.
Acting Division Engineer, Division One
Clay Willis pa aw
Environmental Officer, ivision One
RECEIVED
FEB 2 3 2011
E! orsiivvdQ1yDCM
113 Airport Dr., Suite 100, Edenton, NC 27932 — Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

d " � RECEIVED
FEB 2 3 2011 ift
M 0 roil ecd city D C3%11R
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE EUGENE A. CONTI, JR.
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
February 9, 2011
Bill Biddlecome
USACE Washington Regulatory Office
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
Dear Mr. Biddlecome,
The NCDOT requests the issuance of a Nationwide Permit 14 for the replacement
of Bridges #12 and 25 in Hertford County and associated relocation of overhead power
lines and directional boring of fiber optic lines under Ahoskie Creek and adjacent
wetlands. This project is included in the Federal Stimulus Program associated with the
ARRA (America Recovery and Reinvestment Act). The bridges are located on US
13/NC 42 approximately 2.8 miles south of Ahoskie. Bridge #12 spans Ahoskie Creek,
which is a tributary that flows to the Chowan River approximately 17.0 miles
downstream. Bridge #25 spans a floodplain overflow in Ahoskie Swamp. The Division
of Water Quality classifies Ahoskie Creek (Ahoskie Swamp/Bear Swamp) as Class "C",
"NSW" waters, and it is also designated an anadromous fish spawning area by the
Wildlife Resource Commission.
The existing Bridge # 12 has a reinforced concrete floor on timber, joist timber end bents,
and timber piles with steel crutch bents at interior bents. Bridge # 12 is 120 ft. long by 28
ft. wide. Existing Bridge # 25 has a reinforced concrete floor on timber, joist end bents,
and timber piles with steel crutch bents at interior bent 2. Bridge # 25 is 70 ft. long by
28.2 ft. wide.
Both structures will be removed using NCDOT's guidelines for bridge removal, which
will prevent material from being dropped into the stream. The proposed bridges will be
replaced on the existing alignment. The new bridge structures will be constructed as
follows. Bridge # 12 will be 167.5 ft. in length by 36 ft. wide and built with a cored slab
concrete deck, a vertical steel sheeting abutment on the south end and a spill through
abutment on the north end. Bridge # 25 will be 112.4 ft. in length by 36.0 ft. wide and
built with a cored slab concrete deck, a vertical steel sheeting abutment on the south end
and a spill through abutment on the north end.
113 Airport Dr., Suite 100, Edenton, NC 27932 — Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

The bridge roadway approaches will have to be reconstructed to meet current design
standards. The roadway grade at the southern end of Bridge # 12 will be raised
approximately 3.5 feet to allow for the vertical curve south of the bridge. The roadway
grade will be raised approximately 1.2 feet at the north end of Bridge # 25 to tie in the
proposed grade with the existing roadway. These roadway changes will result in some
widening of the shoulders, which will permanently impact 2,020 sq. ft. (0.05 acre) of
riverine wetlands. In addition, 0.21 acre of wetland will be cleared for roadside
maintenance and for overhead utility line relocation required for construction. This
acreage does not include the area already cleared for the existing power line easement
adjacent to the roadway. These impacts will be mitigated through a combination of on-
site wetland restoration and in -lieu fee payment. Wetland restoration will be performed
through the removal of 0.01 acre of old approach fill under Bridge #12, grading the
restored area to match adjacent wetland elevations, and seeding according to current
NCDOT on-site mitigation specifications. The remaining 0.04 acre of impact from fill
will be mitigated through requesting 0.08 acre of riverine wetland restoration through the
EEP. The additional 0.21 acre of clearing for utility and roadside maintenance will be
mitigated through requesting 0.21 acre of riverine wetland restoration from EEP. Total
required mitigation from EEP will be 0.29 acre. An off-site detour will be utilized to
detour traffic around the project area.
The original proposal for this project included lengthening the primary structure (Bridge
#12) to approximately 300 feet and replacing the overflow structure (Bridge #25) with a
box culvert. Upon completion of the hydraulic and flood modeling analysis, it was
determined that significant flow is directed toward the overflow structure during flood
events. Therefore, the replacement of both bridges as proposed would better serve to pass
flood waters with minimal impact to the environment and future roadway. Bridge #25
has been lengthened and designed with a skew angle to improve flood passage. Bridge
#12 has been lengthened to provide additional flood passage along Ahoskie Creek, and
allow for restoration of wetlands under the north side of the bridge. Ahoskie Creek is
channelized through out the project area, upstream and downstream, which decreases the
effectiveness of one longer structure and makes the proposed dual bridge project more
effective in passing flood waters.
Stormwater improvements have also been designed as part of this project, although little
additional impervious surface will be constructed. The existing concrete ditches on the
south end of the project currently discharge in close proximity to Ahoskie Creek down the
steep southern approach. The proposed design routes most of the stormwater from the
east to the west side of the road and outlets into an existing ditch at Station 18+00. The
stormwater then flows through approximately 250 feet of upland prior to discharge into
the wetlands associated with Ahoskie Creek. This provides treatment of stormwater
runoff prior to discharge. The remaining stormwater from a greatly reduced drainage area
along the roadway is discharged into uplands adjacent to Ahoskie Creek.
Stormwater between the bridges will be collected and discharged at non-erosive velocities
at Station 26+25. This outlet was originally considered at the small upland area to the
north. However, this upland area is adjacent to the open water scour hole of the overflow
channel. Therefore, the outlet was moved further from the scou
Pro Mob MW
113 Airport Dr., Suite 100, Edenton, NC 27932 — Phone: [phone]'F'S-.4252) .S2) 38-U22
MOreilec,dCNui DGM

increased protection and stability. Deck drains, currently discharging both to Ahoskie
Creek and the overflow channel, will be eliminated over surface water. The northernmost
30 feet of Bridge #12 requires deck drains to avoid potential hydroplaning as a result of
water spreading into the travel lanes. The proposed deck drains will discharge directly
into wetland areas under the north side of Bridge #12, replacing the current drains that
discharge directly into the surface water. A collection system was considered for this
bridge but it was determined that deck drains with minimal discharge would be preferred
to a larger concentrated direct discharge into wetlands adjacent to Ahoskie Creek. Deck
drains have been eliminated on Bridge #25.
Based on our review of the proposed design and construction methods, this project is
eligible for consideration under Nationwide Permit 14 and corresponding Section 401
General Certification 3820. Included with this letter are a pre -construction notification,
permit drawings, and location map. CAMA MP -1 and 5 forms and landowner notices are
included for NC Division of Coastal Management review. Authorization to debit the
$240 Permit Application Fee from WBS Element 41730.3.ST1 is hereby given to the NC
Division of Water Quality for the 401 review. If you have questions please do not
hesitate to call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Jerry Jennings, P.E.
Division Engineer, Division One
Clay Willis a7i � --
Environmental Officer, Division One
cc: Brian Wrenn, NCDWQ Transportation Pennitting Unit
Garcy Ward, NCDWQ
PECEIVAft
FEB 2 3 2011
M 0r01J0V;dC;fYpC�I
113 Airport Dr., Suite 100, Edenton, NC 27932 — Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

ON MP -1
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
(last revised 12/27106)
RECEIVED
FEB
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1. Primary Applicant/ Landowner Information
Business Name
NCDOT Division One
Project Name (if applicable)
Bridges # 12 & 25 over Ahoskie Creek
Applicant 1: First Name
Clay
MI
Last Name
Willis
Applicant 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
If additional applicants, please attach an additional page(s) with names listed.
Mailing Address
113 Airport Drive, Suite 100
PO Box
City
Edenton
State
NC
ZIP
27932
Country
US
Phone No.
252 - 482 - 7977 ext. 221
FAX No.
252 -482-8722
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
[e-mail]
2. Agent/Contractor Information
Business Name
N/A
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
ZIP
Phone No. 1
-
- ext.
Phone No. 2
- - ext.
FAX No.
Contractor #
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
<Form continues on back>
apssi }„i,isa &28a #35 r+rwrvar.rac; us8e8a�aar�� g e rsast.rea

Form DCM MP -1 (Page 2 of 5)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
IRL
�c�frFj�t,
s
3. Project LocationT. VEB 2 3 2011 `
County (can be multiple)
Street Address
State Rd. #
Hertford
US 13/NC 42 (approx. 1500 ft. north of Bertie County line)
N6100';�
Subdivision Name
City
State
Zip
N/A
N/A
NC
27910 -
Phone No.
Lot No. (s) (if many, attach additional page with list)
N/A - ext.
N/A, , , ,
a. In which NC river basin is the project located?
b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
Chowan
Ahoskie Creek (Ahoskie Swamp, Bear Swamp)
c. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade?
d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
®Natural ❑Manmade ❑Unknown
Ahoskie Creek
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
f. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
❑Yes ®No
work falls within.
If yes, by whom?
N/A
4. Site Description
a. Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.)
b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.)
200 ft. (100 on each bank of Ahoskie Creek)
188,500 sq. ft.
c. Size of individual lot(s)
d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
N/A, I I
NWL (normal water level)
(If many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list)
12 ft. ❑NHW or ®NWL
e. Vegetation on tract
Bottomland hardwood forest is present on both sides of the bridges and connecting roadway. This area is mostly wetland
with mature trees including american elm, bald cypress, laurel oak, and sycamore. No coastal wetland species are present
on the site.
f. Man-made features and uses now on tract
NC 42 and Bridges #12 and #25 are the only man-made features on the tract. It is used as a thoroughfare for the travelling
public. Bridge # 12 crosses Ahoskie Creek, while Bridge # 25 crosses an overflow channel with no direct connection to the
stream except by diffuse flow through the bottomland wetlands during flood events. An overhead power line runs along the
western side of the project and crosses to the east over Bridge #25.
g. Identify and describe the existing land uses adiacent to the proposed project site.
The adjacent land use is primarily undeveloped forest. At the south end of the project, a cemetery is present to the east of
the roadway but outside the project area.
h. How does local government zone the tract?
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
N/A
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
❑Yes ❑No ®NA
j. Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? ❑Yes IZINo
k. Hasa professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. ❑Yes ®No [:]NA
If yes, by whom?
I. Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does ft involve a ❑Yes ®No []NA
National Register listed or eligible property?
<Form continues on next page>
k

Form DCM MP -1 (Page 3 of 5) APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
m. (i) Are there wetlands on the site? ®Yes ❑No
00 Are there coastal wetlands on the site? ❑Yes ®No
(iii) If yes to either (i) or (ii) above, has a delineation been conducted? ®Yes ❑No
(Attach documentation, if available) Al
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities. yc
None
FEB 2 3 2011
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
None
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems.
Stormwater is routed through concrete ditches south of Bridge # 12 and discharged within 50 feet of the surface water. Deck
drains on both bridges discharge into Ahoskie Creek (Bridge #12) or the overflow channel (Bridge #25).
5. Activities and Impacts
a. Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use? ❑Commercial ®Public/Government
❑ Private/Community
b. Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
The project will provide safe and efficient tranportation access along US 13/NC 42 by replacing the aging bridge structures
and widening existing travel lanes and shoulders to meet current design standards.
c. Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
The bridges will be constructed using top-down methods. No equipment or staging will be placed in surface waters or
wetlands. Cranes and other standard construction equipment will be used to drive piles, and place the concrete slabs.
Dump trucks, excavators and other standard construction equipment will be used to haul and place materials used in
construction. The road will be closed between the two bridges during construction and the existing roadway used for staging
materials and equipment.
d. List all development activities you propose.
The existing Bridge #12 (120 ft. long by 28 ft. wide) and Bridge #25 (70 ft. long by 28.2 ft. wide) will be removed using
NCDOT standard bridge removal techniques. The new Bridge #12 (167.5 ft. long by 36 ft. wide) and Bridge #25 (112.4 ft.
long by 36 ft. wide) will be constructed on the existing alignment. The road will be closed for the construction period, and an
off-site detour will be used to route traffic. Road surfaces will be replaced to tie to the new bridges, and shoulder fill will be
placed to create the proper roadside slopes.
e. Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? Maintenance/replacement of existing
structures.
f. What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project? 2.60 ❑Sq.Ft or ®Acres
g. Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area []Yes ®No ❑NA
that the public has established use of?
h. Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
Discharge to waters of the state will occur for bridge support (driven steel H -piles), a minimal amount of structural fill at the
end bents and for expansion of the roadway and shoulders to meet current standards. The fill material will impact previously
disturbed fringes of the bottomland wetlands under the current power line easement on the west side of the project.
Additional clearing will be necessary to move the existing overhead power line out of the roadway. Trees will be cleared but
not grubbed up to the right-of-way for future maintenance. Steel sheeting will be placed on the south side of Bridges #12
and #25 to prevent scouring of the embankments. Approximatelye 0.01 acres of existing roadway fill will be removed for the
lengthening of Bridge #12, and wetland elevation restored in this area.
i. Will wastewater or stormwater be discharged into a wetland? ®Yes ❑No []NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water? []Yes ❑No ®NA
252-808•2608 .. 1-888-4RCOAST avwt ,vr:coa%ta1maasec9r:m ent.net

Form DCM MP -1 (Page 4 of 5)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
j. Is there any mitigation proposed? NYes EM LINA
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal. SFR 6) q gnill
<Form continues on back> i`t oreheadMID�`N
6. Additional Information
In addition to this completed application form, (MP -1) the following items below, if applicable, must be submitted in order for the application
package to be complete. Items (a) — (f) are always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
instruction booklet on how to properly prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
f. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name See attached property owner list Phone No.
Address
Name Phone No.
Address
Name Phone No.
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
None
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, if applicable.
I. Wetland delineation, if necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10), if necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
1 7. Certification and Permission to Enter on Land I
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify t at the information provided in this application is truthful to the be t of my knowledge.
Date 2 Print Name L
Signature /
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed project.
❑DCM MP -2 Excavation and Fill Information NDCM MP -5 Bridges and Culverts
25e -809,28C01 _. 1 -8801 -oft ST

Form DCM MP -1 (Page 5 of 5)
❑DCM MP -3 Upland Development
❑DCM MP -4 Structures Information
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
1w
FEB 2 3 2011
fdorebovdCHYMM
'80e, -.1 B0 a I -8,98-4RCOAST -- www.nccoasta I man a qpment.net

I k
Form DCM MP -5
BRIDGES and CULVERTS FEB 23 2011"
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP -1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
1. BRIDGES ❑ This section not applicable
a. Is the proposed bridge: b. Water body to be crossed by bridge:
❑Commercial ®Public/Government ❑Private/Community Ahoskie Swamp - overflow pool of Ahoskie Creek
c. Type of bridge (construction material):
2 -span concrete cored slab on steel H -piles
e. (i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge: 70 ft.
(iii) Width of existing bridge: 28,
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge: n/a
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain) Yes - all of the existing structure will be
removed using standard NCDOT practices for bridge
demolition.
9. Length of proposed bridge: 112.4 ft.
i. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow? ®Yes []No
If yes, explain: The existing water flow will be less restricted
as Bridge #25 has wider spans (55 ft.) and is
lengthened approximately 50 feet, providing
additional flood passage.
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge: n/a
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at NLW or NWL:
0-8 ft.
f. (i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert? []Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert:
(iii) Width of existing culvert:
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
h. Width of proposed bridge: 36.0 ft.
j. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by reducing or
increasing the existing navigable opening? ®Yes ❑No
If yes, explain: The overflow channel under Bridge 25 is not
connected to Ahoskie Creek and therefore is not navigable.
I. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard concerning their
approval? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain: N/A
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing no navigable n. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands: 7 ft.
waters? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain:
2. CUL VERTS ®This section not applicable
a. Number of culverts proposed:
b. Water body in which the culvert is to be placed:
252-808-2808 :: 1-886,RCOAST :: revised: 10 ,126/iib

I t
Form DCS( I` -S (Bridges and Culverts, Page 2 of 4;
< Form continues on back>
c. Type of culvert (construction material):
d. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
❑Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge:
(iii) Width of existing bridge:
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain)
f• Length of proposed culvert:
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the NHW or NWL
j. Will the proposed culvert affect navigation by reducing or
increasing the existing navigable opening? ❑Yes []No
If yes, explain:
RECEIVED
FEB 2 3 2011'
M0Toilecdcp�yj) s�yq
e. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
[—]Yes [:]No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert(s):
(iii) Width of existing culvert(s):
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
g Width of proposed culvert:
i. Depth of culvert to be buried below existing bottom contour.
k. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
[]Yes ❑No
If yes, explain:
3. EXCAVATION and FILL [I This section not applicable
a. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation below the NHW or NWL? []Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated:
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated:
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated:
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards:
b. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
252-809-290 1 •kid 3 4RCOAST --ww.nccaastaim ansa_qe ent.net reviser!: 10/26/06

Form r - (13vidges and Culverts, Page 3 of 4)
c. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
high -ground excavation? ®Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated: 30 didow
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated: 60
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated: 6
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards: 410 FEB 2 3 2011
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any excavation, please complete the following:
(i) Location of the spoil disposal area: Approved NCDOT waste disposal site
(ii) Dimensions of the spoil disposal area: To be determined.
(iii) Do you claim title to the disposal area? ®Yes []No (If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.)
(iv) Will the disposal area be available for future maintenance? ®Yes []No
(v) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAVs), other wetlands (WL), or shell
bottom (SB)?
❑CW ❑SAV OWL ❑SB ®None
If any boxes are checked, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
(vi) Does the disposal area include any area below the NHW or NWL? ? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
e. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed below NHW or NWL? ❑Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled:
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled:
(iv) Purpose of fill:
9-
(i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed on high -ground? ®Yes []No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled: 450 ft.
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled: 20 ft.
(iv) Purpose of fill: Increased grade on roadway
approaches to eliminate sharp vertical curve in road.
4. GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project require the relocation of any existing
utility lines? ®Yes []No
(i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
[]CW [I SAV ❑SB
®WL 1791 so. ft. El None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
Construction of end bents, road shoulders, and
expansion of travel lanes to accommodate proposed
bridge and current safety standards.
b. Will the proposed project require the construction of any temporary
detour structures? ❑Yes ®No
X62-ii&3•�3's£ftt :; t•�3att-�i4��:t:7"f ;: wusv�s.ncczar�staEmao�aeer+t.nct acsras�; °°+

f
oro 0-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 4 of 4)
If yes, explain: Overhead power lines will be shifted to the
west slightly to avoid roadway. A fiber optic line will be
directionally drilled under Ahoskie Creek and associated
wetlands.
If yes, explain:
If this portion of the proposed project has already received
approval from local authorities, please attach a copy of the
approval or certification.
< Form continues on back>
c. Will the proposed project require any work channels? d. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion
❑Yes NNo controlled?
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2. NCDOT Sediment and Erosion Control BMPs
e. What type of construction equipment will be used (for example
dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
Crane, dump truck, excavator and other standard
construction equipment
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
shoreline stabilization? ❑Yes NNo
If yes, complete form MP -2, Section 3 for Shoreline
Stabilization only.
'/VI
Date
Project Name /
Applicant Name
Applicant Signature
f. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project site?
[]Yes NNo
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
FEB 2 3 2011 '#
MorsheMMY' DCM
�s•• tSf3£S :: t-fs£ 8-4 OAST :: wwwaiccoaso, Imanageinent.not revised- 10/261106

Form DCM MP -5 ����
BRIDGES and CULVERTS FEB 2 3 2011'
Morehec=,nr
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP -1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
1. BRIDGES ❑ This section not applicable
a. Is the proposed bridge: b. Water body to be crossed by bridge:
❑Commercial ®Public/Government ❑Private/Community Ahoskie Creek (Ahoskie Swamp)
c. Type of bridge (construction material):
3 -span concrete cored slab on steel H -piles
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at NLW or NWL:
4 ft. to 7.5 ft.
e. (i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? ®Yes []No f
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge: 120 ft.
(iii) Width of existing bridge: 28 ft.
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge: 10 ft.
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain) Yes - all of the existing structure will be
removed using standard NCDOT practices for bridge
demolition.
9• Length of proposed bridge: 167.5 ft.
(i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert? []Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert:
(iii) Width of existing culvert:
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
h. Width of proposed bridge: 36 ft.
i. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow? ®Yes []No j
If yes, explain: The existing water flow will be less restricted
as Bridge #12 has wider spans (55 ft.) and a higher
clearance. It will also be 47.5 ft. longer, providing
additional flood passage.
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge: 12 - 13 ft.
Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by reducing or
increasing the existing navigable opening? ®Yes ❑No
If yes, explain: The existing navigable opening will be
increased as Bridge #12 low steel to normal water line will
be raised 2.7 feet and spans lengthened from 17 ft. to 55 ft.
I. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard concerning their
approval? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain: N/A
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing no navigable n. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands: 9 ft.
waters? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain:
2. CUL VERTS ® This section not applicable
a. Number of culverts proposed:
b. Water body in which the culvert is to be placed:
252-808.2808 :: 1-888-4PCOAST revised-, 10;2WO6

f f
Form DUO - (Bridges and Culverts, -,vqe 2 of 4)
FEB 2 3 2011'
< Form continues on back>
c. Type of culvert (construction material):
More jeadcg Dcm'
d. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge? e. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
❑Yes ❑No []Yes ONO
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge:
(iii) Width of existing bridge:
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge: _
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain)
f. Length of proposed culvert:
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the NHW or NWL.
j. Will the proposed culvert affect navigation by reducing or
increasing the existing navigable opening? ❑Yes ❑No
If yes, explain:
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert(s):
(iii) Width of existing culvert(s):
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
9• Width of proposed culvert:
i. Depth of culvert to be buried below existing bottom contour.
k. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
❑Yes ❑No
If yes, explain:
3. EXCAVATION and FILL ❑This section not applicable
a. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation below the NHW or NWL? ❑Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated:
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated:
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated:
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards:
c. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
high -ground excavation? ®Yes []No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated: 200ft.
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated: 30 ft.
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated: 3 ft.
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards: 685
b. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
❑WL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
2,152-806-2808 1-888-ARCOAST .. uvw.xrccoastptnaana, rsaent.nct revised- 10f26!06

rn 0,, FAP-5 FAP-5i 3ridr es and Culverts, Page :3 of 4)
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any excavation, please complete the following: FEB 3 2O
(i) Location of the spoil disposal area: Approved NCDOT waste disposal site
e.
(ii) Dimensions of the spoil disposal area: To be determined.
(iii) Do you claim title to the disposal area? ®Yes ❑No (If no, attach a /ettergranting permission from the owner.)
(iv) Will the disposal area be available for future maintenance? ®Yes [:]No
(v) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAVs), other wetlands (WL), or shell
bottom (SB)?
❑CW ❑SAV ❑WL ❑SB ®None
If any boxes are checked, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
(vi) Does the disposal area include any area below the NHW or NWL? ? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
(i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed below NHW or NWL? ❑Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled:
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled:
(iv) Purpose of fill:
g. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed on high -ground? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled: 1100 ft.
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled: 10 ft.
(iv) Purpose of fill: Increased grade on roadway
approaches to eliminate sharp vertical curve in road.
f. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
®WL 229 sa. ft. ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
Construction of end bents, road shoulders, and
expansion of travel lanes to accommodate proposed
bridge and current safety standards.
a. Will the proposed project require the relocation of any existing b. Will the proposed project require the construction of any temporary
utility lines? ®Yes []No detour structures? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain: Overhead power lines will be shifted to the If yes, explain:
west slightly to avoid roadway. A fiber optic line will be
directionally drilled under Ahoskie Creek and associated
wetlands.
If this portion of the proposed project has already received
approval from local authorities, please attach a copy of the
approval or certification.
252.808-2808 :. 9-888-411C'S S,'T :. www.occo stalmanaa raven -rcpt revised: 10'201?1.1s

Form, OCM MP -5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 4 of 4)
< Form continues on back>
c. Will the proposed project require any work channels? d. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion
❑Yes ®No controlled?
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2.
e. What type of construction equipment will be used (for example,
dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
Crane, dump truck, excavator and other standard
construction equipment
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
shoreline stabilization? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, complete form MP -2, Section 3 for Shoreline
Stabilization only.
NCDOT Sediment and Erosion Control BMPs
f. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project site?
❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
FEB 2 3 2011
MOrOhOOCIPIDICM,
252-O0&2808 :: 1-688.4RGOAST -- www.necoastal ansa ernent.net revised: 10126/06
a
Date
-501
Project Name
(J/.4
V �j
Applicant Name
Applicant Signature
NCDOT Sediment and Erosion Control BMPs
f. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project site?
❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
FEB 2 3 2011
MOrOhOOCIPIDICM,
252-O0&2808 :: 1-688.4RGOAST -- www.necoastal ansa ernent.net revised: 10126/06

O�oF W A T Z, Q
�ryy���1��v
LE
aI. wa ED
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page I of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only
❑ Yes
for Corps Permit:
® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
® Yes
❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
® Yes
❑ No
1 In.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
® Yes
❑ No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Replacement of Bridges No. 12 and No. 25 over Ahoskie Creek on US13/NC42
2b.
County:
Hertford
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Ahoskie
2d. Subdivision name:
Not applicable
B-5018
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information FED 2 J
Mi
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
NC Department of Transportations®C
tti
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Clay Willis
3d.
Street address:
113 Airport Drive Suite 100
3e.
City, state, zip:
Edenton, NC 27932
3f.
Telephone no.:
252-482-7977
3g.
Fax no.:
252-482-8722
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page I of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
�'�CFiVE
FEB 2 3 2011
Morel ind C-10CM,
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
See plan sheets
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.2446 Longitude: - 76.9467
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
4.1 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Ahoskie Creek (Ahoskie Swamp)
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of neatest receiving water:
C-NSW
2c. River basin:
Chowan
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application.-
pplication:The
Thesite is an existing roadway with two bridges (#12 & #25). Bridge #12 is over Ahoskie Creek, and Bridge #25 is in the
northernmost portion of the Ahoskie Creek floodplain across an overflow channel connected to Ahoskie Creek
downstream only by diffuse flow through a bottomland wetland system. Land use adjacent to the road is primarily
forested, with a cemetery located on the southeast side.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.44 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
100 ft.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project will replace the two bridge structures and bring the roadway and shoulders up to current design standards.
The bridges were constructed in 1934. Bridge #12 has a sufficiency rating of 16 out of 100. Both bridges will be replaced
at the same time to coordinate an accurate flood passage model and sizing of the structures.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The two existing bridges will be removed using standard NCDOT bridge demolition procedures. No material will be
dropped into the stream or wetlands. The road will be temporarily closed and traffic routed through an off-site detour.
The new bridges will be constructed on the existing roadway alignment using cranes, excavators, dump trucks, and other
standard construction equipment. Road shoulders will be slightly widened and the wetlands cleared to the right-of-way
for future maintenance. An overhead power line will be relocated west of the existing road and a fiber optic cable
directionally drilled under Ahoskie Creek and associated wetlands.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes El No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ Preliminary ® Final
of determination was made.
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Clay Willis - NCDOT Div 1 Other: AMOW
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations an ch clUu ion.
8/17/2009
- I Lu {d V Lull
MorOheMc IMM
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
_ pp/�r 11rrPp 5
FEB 2 3 2011
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number –
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ – non -404, other)
(acres)
T
—Temporary
W1 ®P ❑ T
Fill
Bottomland
® Yes
® Corps
0.01
Hardwood Forest
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ®P ❑ T
Fill
Bottomland
® Yes
® Corps
0.02
Hardwood Forest
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ®P ❑ T
Fill
Bottomland
® Yes
® Corps
0.02
Hardwood Forest
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.05
2h. Comments: An additional 0.21 acres of hand clearing for relocation of overhead power line easement and for future
roadway maintenance will occur as a result of the project.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ – non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ INT
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
S4❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
El Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
0
3i. Comments: Stream impacts limited to driving H -piles at 55 ft intervals for bridge support: 2 bents are located in Ahoskie
Creek totaling less than 0.01 acres of impact. Current bridge supports are being removed and the project would result in an
overall decrease in surface water impacts.
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number-
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑ PEI T
4f. Total open water impacts
0
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number -
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
B1 ❑P❑T
F1 Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P❑T�
❑ Yes
WK
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts have been minimized by replacing the bridges on the existing alignment. Slight increases in roadway fill and
lane/shoulder width are required to meet current design standards. Bridge #12 was lengthened to increase flood passage and
Bridge #25 has been retained and skewed to allow for overflow flood waters to pass safely along natural flow paths.
Shoulders were tied into existing shoulder grades where practical to avoid any adjacent wetland impact. Where fill is required
in wetlands to bring shoulders and roadway to current standards, the amount has been minimized and slopes steepened to
the maximum amount allowable and stable.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Existing sheet piling will be retained to increase stability during construction. Driven H -piles will eliminate the need for drilling
and disposal of associated cuttings. Top down construction will be used to avoid equipment being staged within the stream
and the use of a workbridge.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
® Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ® Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
®Payment to in lieu fee program
® Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
® Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.29 acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
See cover letter.
FEB 2 3 2011
Morebecd CRAG`_,
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWO
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes Z No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
4
TX
EB 2 3 2011
oreheadCRYDCRM
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
NA %
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
Although only limited new impervious surface is being created by the project through
the widening of existing travel lanes,
existing stormwater management on the site is being improved by the replacement of
the current concrete ditches with
expressway gutter discharging into uplands further removed from Ahoskie Creek. Deck drains have been eliminated from
discharging into Ahoskie Creek and pushed back from the bank. Stormwater outfalls
are provided between the bridges to
eliminate erosion of side slopes and discharge as far as practical from surface waters.
Additional measures are
discussed in more detail in the cover letter and attached stomrwater management plan.
NCDOT will follow BMPs in
compliance with their statewide issued NPDES permit.
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
® DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HOW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other: NA
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
�] Yes;-. ❑ No
attached?
-
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes
❑ No
F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWG Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
® Yes
❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
® Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes
® No
Comments: Required NEPA document is a Categorical Exclusion (attached), which
does not require review through the State Clearinghouse.
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project replaces existing two-lane bridges and roadway with upgraded two-lane infrastructure. No
increase in traffic
flow or other influence likely to cause growth in the area is associated with the project.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWO Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No sewage will be created by the project.
0 FEB 2 3 2011
11
MorefiecdC?$) DCM
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
® Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS Hertford County listing, on-site review of habitat by NCDOT for red -cockaded woodpecker.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
EFH mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Concurrence from State Historic Preservation Office.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NC Flood Mapping Program approval will be received for the
project prior to construction. The proposed design raises the bridge and lengthens the flood plain opening, and therefore
will not increase flood elevations.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Current NC Flood Mapping Program dataA4
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Ap * Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is val my if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
�•��..CItiJL6.� -F
,.
FEB 2 3 2011
more iIcc, d 1,WC
Page l 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

OFFICE USE ONLY
Date Received Fee Paid Permit Number
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
LINEAR ROADWAY PROJECT
This form nigv be pholocopied for use as an original.
DWO Stormwater Management Plan Review:
A complete stormwater management plan submittal includes this application form, a supplement form for each BMP
proposed (see Section V), design calculations, and pians and specifications showing all road and BMP details.
I. PROJECT INFORMATION
NCDOT Project Number:NCDOT Design Build TIP B-5018 County -Hertford
Project Name: Replacement of Bridge No. 12 and No. 25 over Ahoskie Creek on US 13/NC 42
Project Location:North of Flerford Co./Bertie Co. line
Contact Person:Max Price Phone:[phone] Fax:[phone]
Receiving Stream Name:Ahoskie Creek River Basin:Chowan C1ass:C.NSW
Proposed linear feet of project: 1935 If
Proposed Structural BMP and Road Station (attach a list ofstatlon and BMP type if more room is needed):
Type of proposed project: (check all that apph9:
❑ New ❑Widening 02 iane'X 04 lane* ❑Curb and Gutter ©Bridge Replacement
❑X Other (Descrihe)Shoulder Berm Cutler and Expresswav Gulley
*? lane and 4 Ione imply that roadside ditches are used unless Curb and Gutter is also checked.
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided below to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting
documentation is attached. Supporting documentation shall, at a minimum, consist of a brief narrative description
including ( I ) the scope of the project, (2) how the items below are met, (3) how the proposed best management practices
minimize water quality impacts, and (4) any significant constraints and/or justification for not meeting a, b, c and d to the
maximum extent practicable.
Designer's Initials
S a. The amount of impervious surface has been minimized as much as possible.
b. The runoff from the impervious areas has been diverted away from surface wa possible.
0 c. Best Management Practices are employed which minimize water quality imp
S'Q d. Vegetated roadside ditches are 3:1 slope or flatter. FEB 2, 3 2011
Form SW401-NCDOT Linear Roadway-Rev.l Page 1 oft

I11. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
1 acknowledge and agree by my initials below that the North Carolina Deparnnent of Transportation is responsible for the
implementation of the four maintenance items listed. I agree to notify DWQ of any operational problems with the BMP's
that would impact water quality or prior to making any changes to the system or responsible party.
Haimenance Engineer's Initials
-514 a. BMP's shall be inspected and maintained in good working order.
Stt-_b. Eroded areas shall be repaired and reseeded as needed.
Sbj1 c. Stornwater collection systems, including piping, inlets, and outlets, shall be maintained to insure proper
ftmctioning.
Maintenance Engineer's Name: 'STF,M1-i.i V)AAeCA—
Title: Div.
IV. APPLICATION CERTIFICATION
1, (print or type name) of Branch,
certify that the information included on this permit application form is, to the best of my knowledge, correct and that the
project will be constructed in conformance with the approved plans and that the proposed project complies with the
requirements of I5A NCAC 2H .l 000.
Title:
Address:
S ignature:
V. SUPPLEMENT FORMS
Date:
The applicable state stormwater management permit supplement form(s) listed below must be submitted for each BMP
specified for this project. Contact the Stormwater and General Permits Unit at [phone] for the status and
availability of these forms.
Form SW401-Low Density
Form SW401-Curb Outlet System
Form SW401-Off-Site System
Form SW401-Wet Detention Basin
Form SW401-Infiltration Basin
Form SW401-Infiltration Trench
Form SW401-Bioretention Cell
Form SW401-Level Spreader
Form SW401-Wetland
Form SW401-Grassed Swale
Form SW401-Sand Filter
Low Density Supplement
Curb Outlet System Supplement
Off -Site System Supplement
Wet Detention Basin Supplement
Infiltration Basin Supplement
Underground Infiltration Trench Supplement
Bioretention Cell Supplement
Level Spreader/Filter Strip/Restored Riparian Buffer Supplement
Constructed Wetland Supplement
Grassed Swale Supplement
Sand Filter Supplement ��CEIIIEL
FEB 2 3 2011
PaM0reiiel*dC'-' if em
Form SW401-NCDOT Linear Roadway-Rev.I Page 2 oft

NCDOT
Hi hway North Carolina Department of Transportations
»° »^ Highway Stormwater Program Version 1. l pd
Released: July 2010 (DRAFT) STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
Pae of
General Project Information
Project No.: B-5018 Date: 01/03/2011
Cit /Town: Ahoskie Designer: M.S. Price
Count ies : Hertford County
Project Mana er: M.S. Price
River Basin(s): Chowan
CAMA County? yes 1TVA County? I no
Primary Receiving Water: Ahoskie Creek NCDWQ Stream Index: 25-14-1
NCDWQ Surface Water Classification for Primary Receiving Water
Primary: Class C
Su lemental: Nutrient Sensitive Waters NSW
Other Stream Classification:
303(d) Stream? no
T e s of Impairment:
State Stormwater Permit Required? yes
If yes, why? CAMA County
Could the Project Impact Threatened or Endan eyed Species? no
Description:
Anadromous Fish Present?
no
Description:
Buffer Rules in Effect?
no Buffer Rules:
Existing Site
Description of Existing Project Area:
US 13 approxamatly 0.25 miles north of SR 1420 Cemeta Road between Powellsville and Ahoskie.
Average Daily Traffic (existing):
ADT 2009 = 7145 Posted Speed Limit 55
Existing Cross Section:
24' pavement with 4' paved shoulders roadway approaches 28.0' clear roadway on Br # 12 and Br. # 25
Surrounding Land Use:
Rural wooded wetlands and floodplain
General Comments:
Bridge # 12 and Bridge # 25 were constructed in 1934. Both bridges have been shored to maintain acceptable load limits. NCDOT bridge Maintenance
Unit records indicate that Br. #12 and Br. 3 25 have a sufficiency rating of 16.9 and 48 respectivly out of a possibe 100.
Project Description
Description of Proposed Project:
Replacement of Br. # 12 over Ahoskie Creek and Br. # 25 over Ahoskie Creek overflow.
Average Daily Traffic (proposed):
ADT 2035 = 11600
Proposed Cross-Section:
24' pavement with 4' paved shoulders, 8 ' total shoulder with guardrail 32'-10"' clear roadway on Br # 12 and 32' on Br. # 25
Interchange Modification:
Median Type:
Terminus:
Terminus:
Project Length Ii Fni�es/fee 0 ;-, , .,._ u
0.366 miles Added Impervious Area ac.: 0.2 acres
General Commen _
FEB 2 3 2011
�"fY®CM
The roadway grade will be raised +/- 3.5' in the vicinity of the southern end of Bridge #12 in order to avoid the need for a design exception for the
vertical curve south of the bridge. The change in grade will result in a 2.7 ' increase in vertical clearance at mid channel. The existing roadway
approach south of Bridge #12 is 24' of pavement with 4' paved shoulders and a concrete lined ditch on both sides. The concrete lined ditch will be
removed and replaced with expressway gutter and standard roadway ditch section. The roadway grade will be raised +/- 1.2' in the vicinity of the
northern end of Bridge #25. A temporary off site detour will be utilized during project construction. The proposed drainage system will consist of cross
pipes. grated inlets with associated pipe systems, roadway swales, shoulder berm gutter. and shoulder berm gutter drainage system.

NCDOT
Hw[-
North Carolina Department of Transportation Version
A�w^ Highway Stormwater Program
Released: July 2010(DRAFn STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
Pae of
Environmental Summar
Ri arian Buffer and Jurisdictional Stream Impacts and Associated SCMs
Station
Stream Name
Stream
Type
Jurisdict.
Stream
Buffer?
Classific-
ation?
Proposed Structure
SCM Type
Checklist
Complete?
DA ac.
Q2
(ft 3/s
Q10
(ft 3/s(ft')
WQv`
-L- 22+56.5
Ahoskie Creek
Perennial
RPW
No
Class C
3 @ 55' Cored Slab
no
no
135.9 sq
mi
-L- 29+18
Ahoskie Creek Overflow
N/A
no
No
2 @ 55' Cored Slab
no
no
I N/A
General Comments:
Surface water impact are limited to <0.01 acres and are a result of the H -pile inerior bents. The BMPs and measures that will be used on this project to reduce stormwater impacts are minimization of
impervious surface, rip rap energery dissipater pads at at pipe outlets, grassed roadway swales with 3:1 side slopes, storm water discharge locations as far from Ahoskie Creek as practical, and
matting or rip rap stabilization of fill slopes that are steeper than 3:1. There will be no direct discharge of bridge deck runnoff into Ahoskie Creek. Four inch deck drains will be required in the last 30' of
the northern end of Bridge #12. Storm drainage was designed to the maximum extent practical to discharge runoff from impervious surfaces in such a way as to maximize the grassed and natural
vegetated swale lengths before discharge into Ahoskie Creek. The proposed expressway gutter and drainage system will allow the natural outfall left of station 18+00 to function more efficiently and
thus increase the lengh of natural vegetarted swale prior to discharge into Ahoskie Creek. The shoulder berm gutter system along the east side of the roadway between the two bridges will allow the
bridge end drains to be discharged as far from Ahoskie Creek as practical.

�CDOT --
Highway North Carolina Department of Transportation
u Version 1.1 a+
Highway Stormwater Program
Released: July 2010 (DRAFT) STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
Pae of
Stream Relocation
Station
Stream Name
Stream Length ft
Additional Information
F. CEfUkiA
-B 2 3 2011'
MoreheadCspj j)CM
General Comments:

NCDOT
Hl 'k1Wdy North Carolina Department of Transportation
Version LI
Highway Stormwater Program
Released: July 2010 (DRAFT) STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN M '
Pae of
Jurisdictional Wetlands
Station
Type of Impact
Minimization of Impact
23+15 to 27+62 -L- Rt.
Approach Fill & Hand Clearing
Used 1.5:1 to 2:1 Rip Rapped Spill Through Abutment Slopes. Used longer guardrail post in
order to use 2' of shoulder behind guardrail instead of 3'.
23+34 to 31+05 -L- Lt.
Approach Fill & Hand Clearing
Used PSRM on Slopes 2.5:1 and Steeper. Used Erosion Control Matting on Slopes 2.5:1 and
Flatter. Used longer guardrail post in order to use 2' of shoulder behind guardrail instead of 3'.
29+72 to 31+63 -L- Lt.
Approach Fill
Used 1.5:1 to 2:1 Rip Rapped Spill Through Abutment Slopes. Used longer guardrail post in
order to use 2' of shoulder behind guardrail instead of 3'.
RECEIVED
FEB 2 3 2011'
General Comments:
Minimized Impacts by replacing the bridges on the existing alignment. Proposed fills for widening were tied into existing shoulder grades where practical to avoid any adjacent
wetland impact. Where fill was require in wetlands to bring the roadway and shoulders to current standards, the impact was minimized by using as steep of slope as practical and
providing slope stabilization measures where required. Driven H-piles were used to eliminate the need for drilling and disposal of the assciated cuttings. Top down construction
will be used to avoid the need for temporary causeways aand or work bridges.

NCDOT
Highway North Carolina Department of Transportation
Highway Stormwater Program
Released: July 2010 (DRAM STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
Version
Pae of
Additional Comments
References
FEB 2 3 2011
MorefjcCdCf�ji)CM

rcosystem
Limamement
PROGRAM
August 5, 2010
Mr. Clay Willis.
Division 1 Environmental Officer
North Carolina Department of Transportation
113 Airport Drive, Suite 100
Edenton, North Carolina 27932
Dear Mr. Willis:
Subject: EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
B-5018, Replace Bridge Numbers 12 and 25 over Ahoskie Creek and Ahoskie Creek Overflow
on US 13, Hertford County
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) will provide the
compensatory riparian wetland mitigation for the subject project. Based on the information received on July 26, 2010, the
impacts are located in CU 03010203 of the Chowan River Basin in the Northern Outer Coastal Plain (NOCP) Eco -Region,
and are as follows:
Chowan
Stream
Wetlands
Buffer (Sq. Ft.)
03010203
Non-
Coastal
NOCP
Cold
Cool
Warm
Riparian
Riparian
Marsh
Zone 1
Zone 2
Impacts (feet/acres)
0
0
0
0.26
0
0
0
0
Mitigation Units
0
0
0
0.52
0
0
0
0
(Credits -up to 2:1)
This mitigation acceptance letter replaces the mitigation acceptance letter issued on July 9, 2009. EEP
commits to implementing sufficient compensatory riparian wetland mitigation credits to offset the impacts associated with
this project by the end of the MOA Year in which this project is permitted, in accordance with Section X of the
Amendment No. 2 to the Memorandum of Agreement between the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, the North Carolina Department of Transportation, and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, fully executed on
March 8, 2007. If the above referenced impact amounts are revised, then this mitigation acceptance letter will no longer be
valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be required from EEP.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth Harmon at 919-715-1929.
Sincerely,
William D. Gilmore, P.E.
EEP Director
cc: Mr. Bill Biddlecome, USACE — Washington Regulatory Field OfficeFEB 2 3 2011
Mr. Brian Wrenn, Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit
Mr. Sterling Baker, P.E., NCDOT Division 1 Maintenance Engineer fv1OreIleM Ct/DCV,
Mr. Gregory Thorpe, Ph.D., NCDOT — PDEA
File: B-5018
Rjutorwg... ... Protech 0" Statv,
NCDENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILM NGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW -2008-01377 County: Hertford U.S.G.S. Quad: Powellsville, NC
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner/Agent: NCDOT
Address: Jerry Jennings, Division Engineer
113 Airport Drive, Suite 100
Edenton, North Carolina 27932 )1P FEB 2 3 2011 .r
Telephone No.: [phone] More ecdCpV1DC�'J
Property description:
Size (acres) 2.4 acres Nearest Town Powellsville
Nearest Waterway Ahoskie Creek River Basin Chowan
USGS HUC 03010203 Coordinates N 36.2445767 W 76.9472553
Location description The project area is adjacent to Bridge # 12 and 25 on US Highway 13 approximately .29 miles
south of the intersection of US Hiahwav 13 and NCSR 1419, crossine over and adiacent to Ahoskie Creek. TIP # B-
5018.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
_ Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
X The waters of the U.S. including wetland on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be
reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
_ The wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps
Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
Page 1 of 2

X The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Elizabeth City, NC, at [phone] to determine
their requirements.
Action Id. SAW -2009-01337
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Bill Biddlecome at [phone].
C. Basis For Determination
This site exhibits wetland criteria as described in the 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual and is adjacent to
Ahoslde Creek. a tributary to the Wiccacon River, which is a tributary to the Chowan River.
D. Remarks
ARRA Prosect
E. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn:Bill Biddlecome, Project Manager,,
Washington Regulatory Field Office
P.O. Box 1000
Washington, North Carolina 27889
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the District Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by October 17, 2009.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the District Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.* *
Corps Regulatory Official: /v
Date 08/17/2009
Expiration Date 08/17/2014
The Wihmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to
do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at our website at hqp://re ug latoiy.usacesurvey.com/ to
complete the survey online.
Copy furnished: �fCEIIIEC�
FEB 2 3 2011
MOrOhOMMji CM
Page 2 of 2

Applicant: NCDOT File Number: SAW -2000- Date: 08/17/2009
01337
Attached is: I See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of I A
[—❑ PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) 1 0" B �xr I
F-1 PERMIT DENIAL , KIECE��Ikr%C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
I F1 PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION '"
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the fnture. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer
within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative rd.)
FEB 2 3 2011'
[tlla�r�li01�'� i1���4®4Sd
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
r.
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you
If you have questions regarding this decision
and/or the appeal process you may contact:
may also contact:
Mr. Bill Biddlecome
Mr. Mike Bell, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Washington Regulatory Field Office
CESAD-ET-CO-R
P.O. Box 1000
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
Washington, North Carolina 27889
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
[phone]
1 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any
government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You
will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site
investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this
form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn:Bill Biddlecome, Project Manager,
Washington Regulatory Field Office, P.O Box 1000, Washington, North Carolina 27889
For Permit denials and Proffered Permits send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Mike Bell,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-ET-CO-R, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15, Atlanta,
Georgia 30303-8801

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (DRAFT)
ProjectjSite: /kf,6.e,� City/County: Sampling Date: O
ApplicanG'Owner: yCl;W {,14Lan Z State: 'IA/ L• SamplingPoint: )4,,? ,a . - l
Investigator(s): 4:��v tizol�IAI Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc,.): ��n t Local relief (concave, convex, none):. e-44IC4.4--Le Slope
Subregion (LRRorbILRA): Let: - 76,. Ll7 y3 Long: 36?. ; 3O / Datum: niq 83
Soil Map Unit Name: 1313 5oik NWI classification: DF O(o F
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation /_, Soil 4AP , or Hydrology &­ significantly disturbed? _ Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes _� No
Are Vegetation /i/y Soil r' , or Hydrology I -le., naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
within a Wetland? 'Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
✓�uJ�tP�q � �i{(� /,�✓3- CJCp�dI G?4YlAe� �U - ���5 l�G'1 G�IGT.!'r/'" �j y���.S�
�u•M-� � �iv �` a� o � rim e�rved` ,� . / U
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (Al)
_✓Water -Stained Leaves (Bg)
✓Sparsely Vegytated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
,/Drainage Patterns (610)
✓ Saturation (A3)
_ Marl Deposits (815) (LRR U)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (61)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
— Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
✓ Sediment Deposits (82)
✓Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
✓Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (63)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
— Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (Cg)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
/Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (03)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
/ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): /O
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth .(inches): 6 ice,
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes v"" No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
_
FEB 2 3 20111
j moroiiecdViWOM
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - DRAFT Version 6-15-2007

SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
i2 3 an
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm'Muek (A9) (LRR O)
_ Fustic Epipedon (A2)
` Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm, Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
— Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
— Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
,/Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
, Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MCRA 15315)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
` Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) wetland hydrology must be present.
— Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
` Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
_ Sandy Gieyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 1536, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil. Present? Yes No
Remarks:
��CEI�EC�
FEB 2 3 2011

VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Pilot sizes: } % Cover Species? Status
4. �VzAa l�qa
5.
Sampling Point:
Dominance Testworksheet:
Number of.Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6. Prevalence Index worKsneet:
7. Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Total Cover: �/ID -- (f D x 1= 60
Sapling Stratum ( ) OBL species
FACW species x 2 = a7 O
GigL FAC species x 3
//
3 160-V e/661 .20 FACU species __D (9— x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: 3 (A) 0 (B)
5
6. Prevalence Index = B/A
7. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Total Cover: -1-0 Z
✓Dominance Test is >50%
Shrub Stratum ( )
1. �/ 52 ✓Gia I� le--� _Prevalence index is 53.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2.
3.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present,
5.
6.
7.
Total Cover:
Herb Stratum2o eldl,
( )
2. a i ��, /0
3.--
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
v
12 3 D FEB 2 3 201t
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum Morofiec=; MY,,fil
2. Pp! 6✓ /12
3.
4• Hydrophytic
5. Vegetation
Total Cover: 2.1— Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).

VVET/LAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf
Coastal Plain Region (DRAFT)
ProjecUSite: //SYr{ I�YPdd frrY�_0 /a,2� City/County: Sampling Date: 3 D9
Applicant/Owner: State: fie- Sampling Point: wi
Investigator(s): �uA� i��S /G'l/LN Sn9ll Section, Township, Range: 14,41tl,
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): / &,(X 70 flmj3 ,r Local relief (concave, convex, none): �i�iJCGdt Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: 7&, 9418 M--? Long: Y6,. 2�7/ - Datum: Na D 83
Soil Map Unit Name: �e��/W� �O�wy Gni/ NWl classification: /✓o.✓E
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes V— No (If no, explain in Remarks.) /
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are `Normal Circumstances" present? Yes !/ No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain.any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No I/
within a Wetland? Yes No r/
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
dr�e, 70'1 YYI69li1f.'S�' O } T¢G �� ��✓ u�J�c�/� r�eCie j
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (A1)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (69)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
— Drainage Patterns (610)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Mari Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
Mpss Trim Lines (616)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (83)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
, Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Other (Explain in Remarks)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
✓
Surface Water Present?
Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?
Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present?
Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
No 1�
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
�eAr �,-61ve 4�10/1n el
RECEIVED
FEB 2 3 2011
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — DRAFT Version 6-15-2007

SOIL Sampling Point: v
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or Confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color moist % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains ZLocatiorc PL=Pore Lininn M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (1718) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (177)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
— Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
wetland hydrology must be present.
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (1717) (MLRA 151)
— Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
rFEB 2 3 2011

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Co Lam,-. t 1v cr2If.
A. Signature
X ❑ Agent
❑ Addressee
f Pn� Na C. DI e of pelivery
,�j J'�z{ 111(
D. Is delivery address different from Item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address Joel ❑ No
3. Se e Type
certified Mall ❑ Express Mail j
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D. !
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number i
(Transfer from service label, 7009 2250 0001 3691 2397
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
l lam, Sc, 2 �-q 6 o
A.
X
D.- Is delivdey a
If YES, enter del ery
FFA l0 m
<ell C)
102595-02-M-1540
❑ Agent
^0 Addressee
Date of Delivery
n Rem 1 ? ❑ Yes
below: ❑ No
Certified Mail Express Mail
IQ Iste ❑Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2.Article Arras rfromNumb7009 2250 0001 3691 2410
(Transfer from service label
:IS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
10 L') v� �J(�JV�l�v1�lZ
19, (30x 2 2
NJ 7
-7')
A.,61 ature
/-fAgent
Addressee
B. R by (Printed Name) �Cyate.of Deliv-r
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: R. No
3. Service Type
Certified Mail ❑ Express Mall
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
?. Article Number 7010 3090 0003 1303 7199
(Transfer from service labeO
'S Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540
WIP, RECEIVED.
FEB 2 3 2011'
M4reiiecdrv?➢➢°1,lD CM

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
;tem 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front If space permits.
1. ArticleLAddressed to: 1 C
oon
VA- Z-3'+32
A. 7SI9�1?I
X O Agent
❑ Addresse
B ecefved by (Printed ) C. Dae of Deliver
a7//,/,1
D. is delivery ad ress different fromItem 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. SegAce Type
Certified Mail ❑ Express Mall
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandis
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number 7010 3090 0003 1,303 7205
(Transfer from service /a6el
'S Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-W154
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailplece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
X413 us 13 ����-►,
2a.7q i
A Ignature
X — ❑Agent
dresse
B. R eived y (Panted Name) C. Date of Deliver
D. Is/delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No-'
3. Service Type
❑ Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandisf
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
taillaft
-
i _
FEB 2 3 2011

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Beverly E. Purdue
GOVERNOR
February 3, 2011
Town of Powellsville
PO Box 22
Powellsville, NC 27967
Dear Sir or Madam,
Gene Conti
SECRETARY
CERTIFIED MAIL
The NC Department of Transportation is proposing to replace bridges # 12 and # 25 on
US 13/NC 42. The bridges are existing 120 ft. X 28 ft. and 70 ft. X 28.2 ft. structures.
The proposed bridges are 167.5 ft. X 36.0 ft. and 112.4 ft. X 36.0 ft. cored slab concrete
structures on the same alignment. Included with this package are the plan sheets detailing
the described bridge replacement. This work will require the closure of the road until the
project is completed. Access will be maintained through an off-site detour.
The Division of Coastal Management (DCM) considers the waters at this location to be
"Public Trust Waters" under their regulations. Therefore, it is provided protection under
state law. For this reason the NCDOT will apply for a permit from the DCM to perform
the described work. Part of the permit process is notifying the adjacent landowners of the
proposed work. A map depicting the project area, along with a design plat and copy of
the permit application is included with this letter. If you have any questions concerning
the proposed work you can contact Clay Willis at 252-482-7977.
The attached form is submitted to insure that you have an opportunity to comment on the
proposal. The work is depicted on the attached drawings. If you have no objects to the
proposal, please return the form with your response within ten (10) days to this office. If
you do have objections to the project, please forward your comments to:
Stephen Lane
NC Division of Coastal Management 1 `��CFiIlE� AW
400 Commerce Avenue FEB 2 3 2011'
Morehead City, N.C. 28577
&1010f 1DCdGff,/DCM
113 Airport Dr., Suite 100, Edenton, NC 27932 — Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

No response within ten (10) days will be cons?rued to mean you have no objections.
Thank you for your cooperation.
:sincerely,
,Jerry Jennings, P.E.
Division Engineer, Division One
C'laY Willis
�1✓
l-nvironmental Officer, Division One
F., EB 2 3 2011
Morefjoc'Ir CC ,-lDCM
113 Airport Dr., Suite 100, Edenton, NC 279321 -- Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

�'�d 57ATt' o
STATE or NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Beverly E. Purdue
GOVERNOR
February 3. 2011
David T. & Tammy L. Morse
2418 US 13 South
Ahoskie, NC 227910
Dear Mr. Copeland,
Gene Conti
SECRETARY
CERTIFIED MAIL,
The NC Department of Transportation is proposing to replace bridges # 12 and # 25 on
US 13/NC 42. The bridges are existing 120 ft. X 28 ft. and 70 ft. X 28.2 ft. structures.
The proposed bridges are 167.5 ft. X 36.0 ft. and 112.4 ft. X 36.0 ft. cored slab concrete
structures on the same alignment. Included with this package are the plan sheets detailing
the described bridge replacement. This work will require the closure of the road until the
project is completed. Access will be maintained through an off-site detour.
The Division of Coastal Management (DCM) considers the waters at this location to be
"Public Trust Waters" under their regulations. "Therefore, it is provided protection under
state law. For this reason the NCDOT will apply for a permit from the DCM to perform
the described work. Part of the permit process is notifying the adjacent landowners of the
proposed work. A map depicting the project area, along with a design plat and copy of
the permit application is included with this letter. If you have any questions concerning
the proposed work you can contact Clay Willis at 252-482-7977.
The attached form is submitted to insure that you have an opportunity to comment on the
proposal. The work is depicted on the attached drawings. If you have no objects to the
proposal, please return the form with your response within ten (10) days to this office. If
you do have objections to the project, please forward your comments to:
Stephen Lane
NC Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce ,Avenue �FCElt1�1:�
iVlorehead City, N.C. 28577
FEB 2 3 2011 `
M0I`91Je0;JC;vyD(;Y,'
113 Airport Dr., Suite 100, Edenton, NC 27932 —Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

No response within ten (10) days will be construed to mean you have no objections.
Thank you for your cooperation.
:sincerely,
.ferry Jennings, P.E.
Division Engineer, Division One
Clay Willis
I Environmentalficer, Division One
FEB 2 3 2011
CtlIC,�T�r�Q�'U 4s:S�f ®F,,r�
113 Airport Dr., Suite 100, Edenton, NC 27932 — Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

NATE oi, NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Beverly E. Purdue
GOVIRNOR
February 3, 2011
Citadel Highland Memorial Gardens, Inc.
PO Box 8839
Greenville, SC 229604
Dear Sir or Madam,
Gene Conti
SECRETARY
CERTIFIED MAIL
The NC Department of Transportation is proposing to replace bridges 4 12 and 4 25 on
US I'VNC 42. The bridges are existing 120 ft. X 28 ft. and 70 ft. X 28.2 ft. structures.
The proposed bridges are 167.5 ft. X 36.0 It. and 112.4 ft. X 36.0 ft. cored slab concrete
structures on the same alignment. hlcluded with this package are the plan sheets detailing
the described bridge replacement. This work will require the closure of the road until the
project is completed. Access will be maintained through an off-site detour.
The Division of Coastal Management (DCM) considers the waters at this location to be
"Public Trust Waters" under their regulations. "Therefore, it is provided protection under
state law. For this reason the NCDOT will apply for a permit from the DCM to perform
the described work. Part of the permit process is notifying the adjacent landowners of the
proposed work. A map depicting the project area, along with a design plat and copy of
the permit application is included with this letter. If you have any questions concerning
the proposed work you can contact Clay Willis at 252-482-7977.
The attached form is submitted to insure that you have an opportunity to comment on the
proposal. The work is depicted on the attached drawings. If you have no objects to the
proposal, please return the fornn with your response within ten (10) days to this office. If
you do have objections to the project, please forward your comments to:
Stephen Lane
NC Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, N.C. 28577 FEB 2 3 2011
C1r oroiigcdC-, ^IDCC j
113 Airport Dr., Suite 100, rdCllton, NC 27932 -- Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

No response within ten (10) days will be construed to mean you have no objections.
"Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
Jerry Jennings, P.E.
Division Engineer, Division One
Clay Willis I&-
l-;nvironmental O icer, Division One
FEB 2 3 2011
113 Airport Dr., Suite 100, Edenton, NC 27932 - Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

� w srn7Z
SPATE oi, NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Beverly E. Purdue
GOVI:RNOR
Febrwry 3. 2011
I Iorton D. Copeland Jr.
1874 Cherry Grove Road N.
Suffolk, VA 23432
Dear Mr. Copeland,
Gene Conti
SECRE FARY
E1:TIFIE® MAIL,
The NC Department of Transportation is proposing to replace bridges # 12 and # 25 on
US 13/NC 42. The bridges are existing 120 f1:. X 28 ft. and 70 ft. X 28.2 ft. structures.
The proposed bridges are 167.5 ft. X 36.0 ft. and 112.4 ft. X 36.0 ft. cored slab concrete
structures on the same alignment. Included with this package are the plan sheets detailing
the described bridge replacement. This work will require the closure of the road until the
project is completed. Access will be maintained through an off-site detour.
The Division of Coastal Management (DCM) considers the waters at this location to be
"Public Trust Waters" under their regulations. Therefore, it is provided protection under
state law. For this reason the NCDOT will apply for a permit from the DC'M to perform
the described work. Part of the permit process is notifying the adjacent landowners of the
proposed work. A map depicting the project area, along with a design plat and copy of
the permit application is included with this letter. If you have any questions concerning
the proposed work you can contact Clay Wi'Iis at 252-482-7977.
The attached form is submitted to insure that you have an opportunity to comment on the
proposal. The work is depicted on the attached drawings. If you have no objects to the
proposal, please return the f«rm with your response within ten (10) days to this office. If
you do have objections to the project, please forward your comments to:
Stephen Lane
'�CEI!!E'
NC Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, N.C. 28577 FEB 2 3 2011
Moroi 105d UNDUM
1 13 Airport Dr.. Suite 100, Fde;nton, NC 2793'. - Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

No response within ten (10) days will be construed to mean you have no objections.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
.Jerry ,Jennings, P.E.
Division Engineer, Divisio One
t_'iay Willis
l?nvironmentat(i)cer, Division One
Ow DECEIVED r 1.
FEB 2 3 2011
Moroi iecd Qiv RX
113 Airport Dr., Suite 100, Edenton, NC 27932 -- Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

e;;r SiAT£a
STATE oP NORTH CAR0I-INA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA"-TION
Beverly E. Purdue
GOVERNOR
February 3, 2011
Beasley Farms, Inc.
PO Box 38
Colerain, NC 27924
Dear Sir or Madam,
Gene Conti
SECRETARY
CERTIFIED MAH
The NC Department of Transportation is proposing to replace bridges # 12 and # 25 on
US 13/NC 42. The bridges are existing 120 ft. X 28 ft. and 70 ft. X 28.2 ft. structures.
The proposed bridges are 167.5 ft. X 36.0 ft. and 112.4 ft. X 36.0 ft. cored slab concrete
structures on the same alignment. Included with this package are the plan sheets detailing
the described bridge replacement. This work will require the closure of the road until the
project is completed. Access will be maintained through an off-site detour.
The Division of Coastal Management (DCM) considers the waters at this location to be
"Public Trust Waters" under their regulations. Therefore, it is provided protection under
state law. For this reason the NCDOT will apply for a permit from the DCM to perform
the described work. Part ofthe permit process is notifying the adjacent landowners of the
proposed work. A map depicting the project area, along with a design plat and copy of
the permit application is included with this letter. If you have any questions concerning
the proposed work you can contact Clay Willis at 252-482-7977.
The attached form is submitted to insure that you have an opportunity to comment on the
proposal. The work is depicted on the attached drawings. If you have no objects to the
proposal, please return the form with your response within ten (10) days to this office. If
you do have objections to the project, please forward your comments to:
Stephen Lane
NC Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, N.C. 28577 FEB 2 3 2011
moroheoarl)ofl
113 Airport Dr., Suite 100, Edenton, NC 27932 - Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

No response within ten (l 0) days will be construed to mean you have no objections.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
.Jerry Jennings, P.E.
Division Engineer, Division One
Clay Willis
Environmental Officer, Division One
RECEIVE©
FEB 2 3 2011
lftreheadCiflocm
113 Airport Dr., Suite 100, Edenton, NC 27932 -- Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

4. {
D ''PROJECT x,
k
y f ti ,�yY
ff
` BEGI PROJ Z'}ir
5 i1 t]
L j f
VICINITY MAP
efECEIVEV
FEB 2 3 2011
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
HERTFORD COUNTY
WETLAND/STREAM PROJECT:41730.3.ST1 (B-5018)
IMPACTS BRIDGE NO. 12 AND BRIDGE NO. 25
VICINITY MAP OVER AHOSKIE CREEK
ON US 13/NC 42
SHEET OF 11/23/10

PROPERTY OWNERS
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
PARCEL NO. NAMES
1 TOWN OF POWELLSVILLE
2 BEASLEY FARMS, INC.
3 CITADEL HIGHLAND
MEMORIAL GARDENS, LLC.
4 DAVID T. MORSE &
TAMMY L. MORSE
S HORTON D. COPELAND
ADDRESSES
PO Boa Powellsville, NC 27967
PO Boa 38 Colerain, NC 27924
PO Boa 8839 Greenville, SC 29604
2418 US 13 South Ahoskie, NC 27910
1874 Cherry Grove Road Suffolk, VA 23432
pratm
7N
FEB 2 3 2011
Morel ler;d C;NDCgp

NOTE: 1 SQ.FT. SURFACE WATER IMPACT PER INTERIOR BENT IN THE CHANNEL.
H -PILES WILL BE UTILIZED IN THE MAIN AND OVERFLOW BRIDGES.
TOTAL WETLAND IMPACTS SHT 04 = 4797 SQ. FT. TOTAL WETLAND IMPACTS = 0.26 AC.
(FILL IN WETLANDS - 229 SF AND HAND CLEARING - 4568SF) ( 11289 SQ. FT.)
(FILL IN WETLANDS -2020 SF AND
TOTAL WETLAND IMPACTS SHT 05 = 6492 SQ. FT. HAND CLEARING 9269 SF)
(FILL IN WETLANDS - 1791 SF AND HAND CLEARING - 4701 SF)
WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLANDIMPACTS
SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Site
No.
Station
(From/To)
Structure
Size / Type
Permanent
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Temp. Excavation Mechanized
Fill In in Clearing
Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands
(ac) (ac) (ac)
Hand
Clearing
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Permanent
SW
impacts
(ac)
Temp.
SW
impacts
(ac)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
(ft)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
(ft)
Natural
Stream
Design
(ft)
1
23+15 TO
BRIDGE # 12 3@55'21" CORED SLAB,
<0.01
0.06
<0.01
27+62-L- RT
HAND CLEARING, & 15" CAAP
2
23+34 TO
N/A
0.02
0.15
31+05 -L- LT
FILL & HAND CLEARING
3 j
29+72 TO
BRIDGE # 25
0.02
<0.01
31+63 -L- LT
2 @ 55'
21" CORED SLAB
F
;.
TOTALS:
0.05
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.21
<0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
NOTE: 1 SQ.FT. SURFACE WATER IMPACT PER INTERIOR BENT IN THE CHANNEL.
H -PILES WILL BE UTILIZED IN THE MAIN AND OVERFLOW BRIDGES.
TOTAL WETLAND IMPACTS SHT 04 = 4797 SQ. FT. TOTAL WETLAND IMPACTS = 0.26 AC.
(FILL IN WETLANDS - 229 SF AND HAND CLEARING - 4568SF) ( 11289 SQ. FT.)
(FILL IN WETLANDS -2020 SF AND
TOTAL WETLAND IMPACTS SHT 05 = 6492 SQ. FT. HAND CLEARING 9269 SF)
(FILL IN WETLANDS - 1791 SF AND HAND CLEARING - 4701 SF)