58382_NC DOT_20120611

LAMA %7 DREDGE & FILL
CSN ERAL PERMIT Previous permit #
❑New ❑Modification ❑Complete Reissue El Partial Reissue Date previous permit issued
As authorized by the State of North Carolina, Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant to 15A NCAC
❑ Rules attached.
Applicant Name Project Location: County
Address Street Address/ State Road/ Lot #(s)
City
Phone # O_
Authorized Agent
Affected ❑ Cw
AEC(s): L1 OEA
❑ PWS:
ORW: yes / no
State ZIP
Fax # ( )
C EW ❑ PTA ❑ ES ❑ PTS
❑ HHF ❑ IH ❑ UBA ❑ N/A
❑ FC:
PNA yes / no Crit.Hab. yes / no
Type of Project/ Activity
Pier (dock) length
Platform(s)
Finger pier(s)
Groin length
number
Bulkhead/ Riprap length
avg distance offshore
max distance offshore
Basin, channel
cubic yards_
Boat ramp
Boathouse/ Boatlift
Beach Bul
Other
Shoreline Length
SAV: not sure yes no
Sandbags: not sure yes no
Moratorium: n/a yes no
Photos: yes no
Waiver Attached: yes n6..
Subdivision
City ZIP
Phone # ( ) River Basin
Adj. Wtr. Body (nat /man /unkn)
Closest Maj. Wtr. Body
(Scale: )
A building permit may be required by:
Notes/ Special Conditions
U See note on back regarding River Basin rules.
Agent or Applicant Printed Name Permit Officer's Signature
Signature ** Please read compliance statement on back of permit* Issuing Date Expiration Date
Application Fee(s) Check # Local Planning Jurisdiction Rover File Name

4
Statement of Compliance and Consistency
This permit is subject to compliance with this application, site drawing and attached general and specific conditions. Any
violation of these terms may subject the permittee to a fine or criminal or civil action; and may cause the permit to become
null and void.
This permit must be on the project site and accessible to the permit officer when the project is inspected for compliance. The
applicant certifies by signing this permit that 1) prior to undertaking any activities authorized by this permit, the applicant will
confer with appropriate local authorities to confirm that this project is consistent with the local land use plan and all local
ordinances, and 2) a written statement or certified mail return receipt has been obtained from the adjacent riparian
landowner(s) .
The State of North Carolina and the Division of Coastal Management, in issuing this permit under the best available
information and belief, certifythatthis project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal Management Program.
River Basin Rules Applicable To Your Project:
❑ Tar - Pamlico River Basin Buffer Rules ❑ Other:
❑ Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules
If indicated on front of permit, your project is subject to the Environmental Management Commission's Buffer Rules for the
River Basin checked above due to its location within that River Basin. These buffer rules are enforced by the NC Division of
Water Quality. Contact the Division of Water Quality at the Washington Regional Office (252-946-6481) or the Wilmington
Regional Office (910-796-7215) for more information on howto complywith these buffer rules.
Division of Coastal Management Offices
Raleigh Office
Morehead City Headquarters
Mailing Address:
400 Commerce Ave
1638 Mail Service Center
Morehead City, NC 28557
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638
252-808-2808/ 1-888-4RCOAST
Location:
Fax: [phone]
2728 Capital Blvd.
(Serves: Carteret, Craven, Onslow -above
Raleigh, NC 27604
New River Inlet- and Pamlico Counties)
919-733-2293
Fax: [phone]
Elizabeth City District
1367 U.S. 17 South
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
252-264-3901
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Camden, Chowan, Currituck,
Dare, Gates, Pasquotank and Perquimans
Counties)
Washington District
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
252-946-6481
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Beaufort, Bertie, Hertford, Hyde,
Tyrrell and Washington Counties)
Wilmington District
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
910-796-7215
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Brunswick, New Hanover,
Onslow -below New River Inlet- and
Pender Counties)
Revised 08/09/06

�;oplicant: I "r L �� l
Date:
Describe below the HABITAT disturbances for the application. All values should rnatch the name, and units of measurement
found in your Habitat code sheet.
Habitat blameincludes
DISTL'^3 l 1 NE
Choose One •
TOTAL Sq. Ft.
(Applied for.
Disturbance total
any
anticipated
restoration or
tam/ impacts)
FINAL Sq. Ft.
(Anticipated final
disturbance.
Excludes any
restoration
and/or temp
im pact amount)
TOTAL Feet
(Applied for.
Disturbance
total includes
any anticipated
restoration or
temp impacts)
FINAL Feet
(Anticipated final
disturbance.
Excludes any
restoration and/or
temp impact
amount
/
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other
r
�j
Dredge ❑ Fill 2--Both0 Other ❑
' 13��
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Doth ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other Q
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ . Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
"u >3 -21-10,33•y �.i; si 1 -��i !: +•i:f:].. �:.T�:1d):y t_n:n.1 •ay...: is,o.:1.^.')t'�'ti.l fl
._i2.3w
�

NCDENR
Borth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Beverly Eaves Perdue Braxton C, Davis
Governor Director
June 11, 2012
NCDOT
c/o Stonewall Mathis
5501 Barbados Blvd.
Castle Hayne, N.C. 28429
Dear Mr. Mathis:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Attached is General Permit #58382 C to replace the existing bridge with a 33' wide X 100' long bridge and
associated infrastructure at bridge # 117, on SR1520, in Maple Hill, North Carolina.
In order to validate this permit, please sign the permit as indicated. Retain the white copy for your files and
return the signed yellow and pink copies to us in the enclosed, self-addressed envelope. If the signed permit
copies are not returned to this office before the initiation of development, you will be working without
authorization and will be subject to a Notice of Violation and subsequent civil penalties.
We appreciate your early attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
-q SL't' �c.�..
Stephen Lane
Coastal Management Representative
rcb
Enclosures
400 Commerce Ave., Morehead City, NC 28557
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
NorthCarohna
Aatumily

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE First -Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
USPS
Permit No. G-10
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
N. C. Department of Transportation
_ Division Three Office
5501 Barbados Blvd.
t Castle Hayne, NC 28429
nn MAY 10 2012
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE First -Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
USPS
Permit No. G-10
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
N. C. Department of Transportation
Division Three Office
5501 Barbados Blvd.
Castle Hayne, NC 28429
Ww.
UNITED STATbS O TIXL= 91XV 7 First G _ ail
:' Permit No. G-10
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
N. C. Department of Transportation
Division Three Office
5501 Barbados Blvd.
Castle Hayne, NC 28429
c
I,tl,llt,it,1,tl„Itil,l„tltltt:Iti,t„I„tii„n,t„u,�,,,,

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to: r
IoLuyt & j UIC
J
1. !�►'1! 11. c
A. SiatureI
� y� El Agent
.�"ac C
❑ Addressee
Received by ( Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery
D. Is delivery address different f 'te ? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
ice Type
3.?2Certifled
Mail
Postal
egistered
CERTIFIED MAIL.
RECEIPT
rlJ
Only;
Er
CO
j
O
CD
O
Postage
$
!v
t
Cr
Certified Fee
i C
fU
C3
Return Receipt Fee
Postmark
Here..
O
(Endorsement Required)
E3
Rbxiricted Delivery Fee
'— E lVED ..
C3
(Endorsement Required)
rOF
Total Postage & Fees
$
qq
9 1012
a
Sent
'TAo/,I I� Ol ( shy d UC t
O
---- .......—
Street, Apt. No.;
) �
1'I/
or PO Box No. lV
N�
' k_t
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to: r
IoLuyt & j UIC
J
1. !�►'1! 11. c
A. SiatureI
� y� El Agent
.�"ac C
❑ Addressee
Received by ( Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery
D. Is delivery address different f 'te ? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
ice Type
3.?2Certifled
Mail
❑ Express Mail
egistered
Retum Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail
C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number 7010 1870 0002 9000 8902
(Transfer from service label)
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt
102595-02-M-1540

m' ■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A nature
CO For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.comu. item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ' ❑ Agent
co ■ Print your name and address on the reverse ❑ Addressee
(,*)l F m so that we Can return the Card to you. B.tAeceived by (Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery
1 10 0
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
Q Postage $ a or on the front if space permits.
Er D. Is delivery addrer,"rticom item 1? ❑ Yes
Certified Fee 1. Article Addressed to: If YES,`enter delivery address below: ❑ No
ru Postmark
C3 Return Receipt
., Recel t Fee �RFCEwHerd
E-3 (Endorsement Required) W^�o�e�-/
r-3RestrictedDelivery Fee -
�y
1:3 �Fndorsement Required)
ca Total Postage & Fees Is , ' I `� �, �I (�NC i-
,� 3. Se ;;'i v
Sent To Certified Mail ❑ E ress Mail
O
�,, w�t� ❑ Registered Return Receipt for Merchandise
L l� 1
------- ---------
O Street, Apt. No.; ,� �� El Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
or Po Box No. �X :'lb (JXy 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 11 Yes
------------
city, State, ZIP �q I'l� I e. l I �g 1
�r2. Article NumberPS Form 7010 1870 0002 9000 8889
(transfer from service label)
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540

Er
�"" `�" r
❑ press Mail
egisteredturn
r -q
❑ Insured Mail
❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
For delivery Information
vis website at w
-it -our
777,
7
Q
b7
o
�
CI
Postage
$
Er
Certified Fee
>r-
RJ
0
Return Receipt Fee
Q
(Endorsement Required)
C3
Restricted Delivery Fee
(Endorsement Required)
cO
Total Postage & Fees
$ kl
Sent To
C3 SIG S��- I�.�J5 "o u�, I r
Street, Apt No.; -------------------------------------------
M -'.__ ,_ __
1 f� or PO Box No. (OlSP�}� ` Y"J.S
Cit State- f l.._..' ,
Crry, Stare, ZI a ' 6� t7• agut
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
UIS so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Postmark Herd l Site pco" 5
RF,�EtVEg" W I l� � rkA V,
A. Signature
❑ Agent
X ❑ Addressee
B. Re ive y (Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery
D. Is delivery address differWroWk& 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
JUN U 4 2012
3/02 ice Type
ertified Mail
�"" `�" r
❑ press Mail
egisteredturn
Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail
❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number 7010 1870 0002 9000 8919
(Transfer from service label)
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540

2119 M14NNr y
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
N. C. Department of Transportation
Division Three Office
5501 Barbados Blvd.
Castle Hayne, NC 28429

-0
.. •
Cr
CD
r
O
5
.o
d
E-3
Postage
$
t0
Ir
�
Certified Fee
ru
O
Return Receipt Fee
35
O
(Eracrsement Required)
C3
Restricted Delivery Fee
CO
(Endorsement Required)
EO
co
Total Postage &Fees
r -q
C3
Sent r
�a� 1 G lir,,..-
='-.0..-- 0
r�
Street, Apt. No-, ----- r
or PO Box No. n)_ y.
U, 11�
---------------------�/11/)l(i
city State, ZIP+411IP
c v t , '(
I VFW""
r}�
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
.-0 so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Postmark G / 1 � l/ fO,- fCp
Here Pr-{ Ll, I � Q f� Y1 V / n '
A. Sign ture
X Agent
10 Addre
B. Received by ( Printed Na e) C. to of D li
���
D. Is delivery address different from item 1 ❑ s
If YES, enter d6livery a6MWf iv: ❑ No
f`
JUN 0 4 2012
3. S Ice Type ')CM M11D
!.ertified Mail ❑xpressTVl
TI
Registered Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
�4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number 7010 1870 0002 9000 8896
(Transfer from service label)
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Mir RECBFYED
' MAY 0 9 2012
DCM-MfflD CIT V,
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE
GOVERNOR
May 7, 2012
Stephen Lane
Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave.
Morehead City, NC 28557
EUGENE A. CONTI, JR.
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: Application for CAMA General Permits .2300 and .1600 for
Replacement of Pender County Bridge #117 & associated Utility Line Work on
SR 1520 Old Maple Hill Road approximately 2.5 mile SW of NC 50
Pender County, BD -51030, WBS # 45349.1.15
Dear Mr. Lane:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) is requesting issuance of CAMA General Permit .2300
to replace Pender County Bridge #117 on SR 1520 Old Maple Hill Road. The proposal is to replace the existing 69
feet long by 20 feet wide bridge with a 100 feet long by 33 feet wide bridge. The existing navigable vertical
clearance would be maintained and slightly improved while the horizontal navigable clearance would be significantly
improved. The proposed bridge replacement project would require utility work. AT&T cables would need to be
relocated as part of this project and a power line would need to be temporarily removed during construction and
replaced on the same poles post construction. Therefore, NCDOT is also requesting the issuance of CAMA General
Permit .1600 authorizing the described utility work.
Please find enclosed the following:
1) CAMA Permit application forms MP -1 and MP -5
2) Adjacent riparian property owner list along with a copy of one of the letters that was sent
3) Certified mail receipts from the mailings to the adjacent riparian property owners
4) Three maps including a vicinity map, an aerial photo map, and a USGS map. Please note that there is for
reference labeled on some of the maps Pender County Bridge #116; no work is proposed for Pender County
Bridge # 116 at this time.
5) Attachment G detailing many aspects and environmental considerations for this project.
6) Wetland Impact Summary Table
7) Four plan sheets as follows: Sheet Number 4 without contours, Sheet Number 4 with contours, Sheet
Number UBO -1 showing the power line work, and Sheet Number UBO -2 showing the AT&T utility work.
8) Bridge Survey Report
9) Email sent 4/26/2012 from me to Amanda Glynn NCDOT Bridge Manager in regard to my conversations
with Mr. Travis Wilson of the NC Wildlife Resources Commission and Ms. Jessi Baker of the NC Division
of Marine Fisheries in regard to moratoriums. Please see below for additional information in this regard.
10) Memorandum from Mr. Wilson to Ms. Glynn dated July 8, 2011 in regard to recommendations for, amongst
others, Pender County Bridge #117 project BD -51030. Please see page 3 near the bottom of the page for
Mr. Wilson's specific comments regarding Pender County Bridge #117 project BD -51030.
5501 BARBADOS BLvD. CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

Pender County Bridge # 117
CAMA Permit Application Cover Letter
May 7, 2012
Page Two
11) Wetland and Stream Package from Mr. Robert Turnbull of Environmental Services, Inc. including the
following:
A) Memo
B) Aerial Map
C) Flagging Info
D) Jurisdictional Determination Form
E) Wetland Data Form
F) Upland Data Form
G) NC Division of Water Quality Stream Identification Form
H) US Army Corps of Engineers Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet
12) NCDOT Cultural Resources Staff Architectural and Archaeological clearance documents for this project
The water body at the location of Pender County Bridge #117 is Holly Shelter Creek and is classified as C Sw. It
appears that Holly Shelter Creek is not classified as Primary Nursery Area nor as Anadromous Fish Spawning Area
at this location. In phone conversations that I had with Travis Wilson of the NC Wildlife Resources Commission
and Jessi Baker of the NC Division of Marine Fisheries on April 26, 2012, both Mr. Wilson and Ms. Baker said that
they would not require a moratorium at this location; please see the attached email in this regard. Also, you may
notice on the Attachment G reference to a moratorium for anadromous fish; this is on the Attachment G because
during our initial scoping efforts it was suspected and therefore noted that an anadromous fish spawning moratorium
may be required. However, this is not the case as is supported by my referenced phone conversations with Mr.
Wilson and Ms. Baker, the followup enclosed email from me to Ms. Glynn regarding my conversations with Mr.
Wilson and Ms. Baker, and the attached memorandum from Mr. Wilson to Ms. Glynn dated July 8, 2011 wherein
Mr. Wilson makes no request nor requirement for a moratorium with regard to Pender County Bridge #117, BD -
51030, a point that Mr. Wilson reiterated during my phone conversation with him on April 26, 2012.
In regard to the note on the Attachment G about the Threatened and Endangered Species evaluation being
unresolved, this evaluation has now been completed and, while habitat does exist for some species, a finding of No
Effect has been decided in regard to all of the listed species for Pender County.
Additionally, NCDOT by copy of this package is making application to the US Army Corps of Engineers for a
Nationwide Permit # 12 for the power line work as Holly Shelter Creek is a Section 10 water body; please also find
enclosed a copy of the cover letter to the USACE in this regard. No application will be made to the NC Division of
Water Quality as there are no 404 impacts associated with this project.
NCDOT acknowledges that a total of $800.00 ($400.00 each) will be debited against the WBS element provided
above for processing these CAMA General Permit .2300 and .1600 applications.
Thank you for all your help working through this process. If you have any questions or need additional information
in this regard please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Stonewall Mathis k*b
Division 3 Environmental Officer
Enclosures
Ms. Amanda Glynn, NCDOT Bridge Manager
Mr. Brad Shaver, USACE, Wilmington District
Mr. Mason Herndon, NCDWQ, Fayetteville

ICM 11F4
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
(last revised 12/27/06)
.CEIVEn
MAY p 9 2012
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1. Primary Applicant(Landowner Information
Business Name
NC Department Of Transportation
Project Name (if applicable)
Pender County Bridge 117 Replacement
Applicant 1: First Name
Stonewall
MI
D
Last Name
Mathis
Applicant 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
If additional applicants, please attach an additional page(s) with names listed.
Mailing Address
5501 Barbados Blvd.
PO Box
City
Castle Hayne
State
NC
ZIP
28429
Country
USA
Phone No.
910 - 341 - 2036 ext.
FAX No.
910 - 675 - 0143
Street Address (d different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
[e-mail]
2. Agent(Contractor Information
Business Name
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
ZIP
Phone No. 1
-
- ext.
Phone No. 2
ext.
FAX No.
Contractor #
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
<Form continues on back>

Form DCM MP -1 (Page 2 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
3. Project Location
County (can be multiple)
Street Address
State Rd. #
Pender
SR 1520 approximately 2.5 miles SW of NC 50
SR 1520
Subdivision Name
City
State
Zip
n/a
near Maple Hill
NC
28454 -
Phone No.
Lot No. (s) (if many, attach additional page with list)
910 - 341 - 2036 ext.
NCDOT ROW, , , ,
a. In which NC river basin is the project located?
b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
Cape Fear
Holly Shelter Creek
c. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade?
d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
®Natural ❑Manmade ❑Unknown
Holly Shelter Creek
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
f. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
®Yes ❑No
work falls within.
Pender County
4. Site Description
a. Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.)
b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.)
135
>1 acre
c. Size of individual lot(s)
d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
n/a, I I
NWL (normal water level)
(if many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list)
10 feet ❑NHW or ®NWL
e. Vegetation on tract
Mostly roadside grasses and some trees in edge of woodline along edge of ROW.
f. Man-made features and uses now on tract
Paved road, bridge, and utilities.
g. Identify and describe the existing land uses adiacent to the proposed project site.
Woodland. There is a driveway approximately 100 feet from the bridge in the southeast comer of the bridge that appears to
be utilized for recreational access to the creek; this driveway would not be eliminated due to this project.
h. How does local government zone the tract?
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
Zoning of the tract is n/a while the adjacent property is
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
zoned RA (rural -agricultural)
❑Yes ❑No ®NA
j. Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? ❑Yes ®No
k. Hasa professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. ®Yes ❑No DNA
If yes, by whom? NCDOT Cultural Resources Staff
I. Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
National Register listed or eligible property?
<Form continues on next page>

Form DCM MP -1 (Page 3 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
m. (i) Are there wetlands on the site?
❑Yes ®No
(ii) Are there coastal wetlands on the site?
❑Yes ®No
(iii) If yes to either (i) or (ii) above, has a delineation been conducted?
®Yes ❑No
(Attach documentation, if available)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
n/a
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
n/a
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems.
At present, stormwater runs off of the bridge deck directly into the creek below.
Also stormwater likely drains to the creek via
overland flow from the roadway.
5. Activities and Impacts
a. Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use? ❑Commercial ®Public/Government
❑Private/Community
b. Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
The roadway and bridge would serve for safer, more stable, and more mobile transportation infrastructure for the traveling
public.
c. Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
Standard road and bridge construction methodologies would be utilized with standard construction equipment such as dump
trucks, excavators, pile driver, and cranes being utilized. Equipment and materials would be stored on upland areas.
d. List all development activities you propose.
NCDOT proposes to replace Pender County Bridge 117, install guardrail, install a stormwater drainage pipe system, rework
the roadway for a distance on the bridge approaches, relocate portions of a buried AT&T cable, remove an electrical
conductor during construction and reinstall it after constuction, perform final grading and stabilization of the roadway and
adjacent roadside areas, and stabilize disturbed areas with rip rap at the bridge abutments and otherwise with vegetation.
e. Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? New work.
f. What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project? 35,000 ®Sq.Ft or ❑Acres
g. Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area ❑Yes ❑No ®NA
that the public has established use of?
h. Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
Existing discharges to waters of the State consist of stormwater bridge deck drainage discharging directly into Holly Shelter
Creek below and also roadway drainage in the vicinity of the creek likely travels via overland flow to discharge into the creek.
The proposed drainage is to catch the stormwater from the bridge deck via over deck flow into a drainage pipe system and
discharge it onto an upland area approximately 60 feet from the creek. Otherwise, roadway drainage would likely still travel
via overland flow and discharge into the creek.
i. Will wastewater or stormwater be discharged into a wetland? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water? ❑Yes ❑No ®NA
j. Is there any mitigation proposed? ❑Yes ®No [INA
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal.
<Form continues on back>

Form DCM MP -1 (Page 4 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
6. Additional Information
In addition to this completed application form, (MP -1) the following items below, if applicable, must be submitted in order for the application
package to be complete. Items (a) — (f) are always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
instruction booklet on how to property prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
f. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name See attached list Phone No.
Address
Name Phone No.
Address
Name Phone No.
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
None available.
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, if applicable.
i. Wetland delineation, if necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10), if necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
7. Certification and Permission to Enter on Land
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further c9rtify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Date 5/ J7j2— Print Name S+cnewall M444,5
Signature
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed project.
❑DCM MP -2 Excavation and Fill Information ,DCM MP -5 Bridges and Culverts
❑DCM MP -3 Upland Development
❑DCM MP -4 Structures Information

HIM 1CM MP -5
BRIDGES and CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP -1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
1. BRIDGES El This section not applicable
a. Is the proposed bridge:
❑Commercial ®Public/Government ❑Private/Community
c. Type of bridge (construction material):
Steel Piles with concrete caps with cored slab horizontal
members with open graded friciton course (type of
asphalt), with concrete bridge rail with two course run of
steel rail on top as this is a bicycle route, and concrete
bridge abutments with rip rap abutment protection.
e. (i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge: 69 feet
(iii) Width of existing bridge: 20.3 feet
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge: 12 feet
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain) All of the existing bridge is to be removed.
g. Length of proposed bridge: 100 feet
b. Water body to be crossed by bridge:
Holly Shelter Creek
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at NLW or NWL:
Approximately 5' at NWL.
f. (i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert? ❑Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert:
(iii) Width of existing culvert:
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
h. Width of proposed bridge: 33 feet
i. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow? ®Yes ❑No j.
If yes, explain: It appears that it would allow water to flow
more freely as there would be fewer piles in the
water as compared with the existing bridge.
Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by reducing or
increasing the existing navigable opening? ®Yes ❑No
If yes, explain: There would be fewer bents in the water so
there should be an improvement in horizontal navigation
potential. The vertical navigable opening would be virtually
unchanged; the profile view appears to show a slight
increase in vertical clearance over the main part of the
channel that would be provided by the proposed bridge as
compared with the existing.
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge: 12 feet I. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard concerning their
approval? [-]Yes ®No
If yes, explain:
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing no navigable n. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands: n/a
waters? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain:

)CM MP-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 2 of 5)
2. CULVERTS ®This section not applicable
a. Number of culverts proposed:
c. Type of culvert (construction material):
b. Water body in which the culvert is to be placed:
< Form continues on back>
d. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge? e. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
❑Yes ❑No ❑Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge:
(iii) Width of existing bridge:
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge: _
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain)
f• Length of proposed culvert:
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the NHW or NWL.
j. Will the proposed culvert affect navigation by reducing or
increasing the existing navigable opening? ❑Yes ❑No
If yes, explain:
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert(s):
(iii) Width of existing culvert(s):
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
9. Width of proposed culvert:
i. Depth of culvert to be buried below existing bottom contour.
k. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
❑Yes [-]No
If yes, explain:
3. EXCAVATION and FILL El This section not applicable
a. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation below the NHW or NWL? []Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated:
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated:
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated:
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards:
b. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
El CW El SAV ❑SB
OWL ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:

r7 -tee. I!'s6"'^N ".40s5 (Bridges ar�-,, -.•"�ts, ���� s 1-7'
C. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
high -ground excavation? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated: 20 feet, 15 feet, 60
feet. and 130 feet respectively for area waterward of
proposed southern bridge abutment, area waterward of
proposed northern bridge abutment, southern AT&T
cable relocate, and northern AT&T cable relocate.
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated: 60 feet for each of the
areas waterward of the bridge abutments and 10 feet for
the AT&T cable relocate.
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated: 5 feet for the areas
waterward of both bridge abutments and assumed
approximately 5 feet for the AT&T cable relocate.
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards:
Approximately 750 cubic yards.
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any excavation, please complete the following:
(i) Location of the spoil disposal area: It is planned that the excavated usable material would be used for the necessary raising of
the grade of the road bed and roadside areas associated with this bridge replacement project. Any unusable and remaining
material would be disposed of in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations.
(ii) Dimensions of the spoil disposal area: Approximately 415 feet by 60 feet
(iii) Do you claim title to the disposal area? ®Yes ❑No (If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.)
(iv) Will the disposal area be available for future maintenance? ®Yes ❑No
(v) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAVs), other wetlands (WL), or shell
bottom (SB)?
❑CW ❑SAV OWL ❑SB ®None
If any boxes are checked, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
(vi) Does the disposal area include any area below the NHW or NWL? ? []Yes ®No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
e. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed below NHW or NWL? ®Yes []No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled: 10.5 feet
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled: 10.5 feet
(iv) Purpose of fill: The above numbers are for the
cumulative dimensions of the seven steel piles that would
be driven into the creek. Each pile has an approximate
dimension of 1.5 feet by 1.5 feet.
g. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed on high -ground? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled: 415 feet for roadway
reconstruction materials including any additional soil fill
material and road substructure material such as ABC and
apshalt as well as the bridge stormwater drainage pipe
catchment system, 40 feet total for the bridge abutments
consisting of concrete wall with rip rap abutment
protection, 220 feet total of guardrail, and 190 feet of new
AT&T cable.
f. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
❑WL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:

F- T" -Am "mwn-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 4 of 5)
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled: Varies from 30 feet to 60
feet for roadway reconstruction, 50 feet for bridge
abutments and associated rip rap, about 2 feet of width
for guardrail, and less than one foot of foreign fill for the
AT&T cable that being the cable itself.
(iv) Purpose of fill: The purpose of the above described fills
are for roadway reconstruction, bridge support via the
bridge abutments, guardrail for safety, and relocation of
the AT&T cable because the existing location is in conflict
with the proposed bridge replacement.
4. GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project require the relocation of any existing
utility lines? ®Yes []No
if yes, explain: Portions of an existing AT&T cable would
have to be relocated due to conflict with the proposed
project. Also, there is an existing power line that would
need to be taken down during construction and placed
back on the existing poles post construction as the
power line would conflict with the proposed project
during construction. There are drawings included that
show both of these utility work items.
If this portion of the proposed project has already received
approval from local authorities, please attach a copy of the
approval or certification.
b. Will the proposed project require the construction of any temporary
detour structures? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain: This is a low traffic volume road and there
would be an offsite detour.
< Form continues on back>
c. Will the proposed project require any work channels? d. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion
[-]Yes ®No controlled?
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2.
Excavated material and fill material would be kept on site
and erosion controlled by proper erosion and
sedimentation control devices including but not limited
to silt fence, waddles, rock checks, special sediment
control fence and the like until such time as the material
is placed and permanently stabilized whether by rip rap
stabilization or vegetation as described in this
application and in the included drawings.

MP -5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 5 of 5)
e. What type of construction equipment will be used (for example,
dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
Standard construction equipment for roadway and bridge
construction would be utilized including dump trucks,
excavators, pile driver, and cranes.
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
shoreline stabilization? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, complete form MP -2, Section 3 for Shoreline
Stabilization only.
5/7/2012
Date
Pender County Bridge 117 Replacement
Project Name
INC Department of Transportation - Stonewall Mathis
ApalicanAN
"Wbq
A Iicant Signature
f. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project site?
❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.

Pender Bridge 117 Adjacent Riparian Owner List
Ila Sue Davis
c/o Earl Davis
615 Earl Davis Rd
Rose Hill, NC 28458
Willoughby Townsend, LLC
2107 Red Hill Church Rd
Dunn, NC 28334
Paul Glenn Wooten
6085 NC Hwy 50
Maple Hill, NC 28454
A.T. Wooten
P.O. Box 89
Maple Hill, NC 28454

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE
GOVERNOR
May 7, 2012
Ila Sue Davis
c/o Earl Davis
615 Earl Davis Rd
Rose Hill, NC 28458
Dear Riparian Neighbor,
EUGENE A. Cowl, JR.
SECRETARY
RECEWED
MAY 1012
DCM-M
HD CITY
The NC Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Pender County Bridge #117 located
on SR 1520 Old Maple Hill Road approximately 2.5 miles southwest of NC 50. NCDOT is applying for
permits to perform the proposed work. You are being notified of this proposal because of Coastal Area
Management Act requirements to notify adjacent riparian property owners of proposed development.
Please see the enclosed plan sheet for your review in regard to this proposal.
If you wish to comment on the proposed project to the regulatory agency of the NC Division of Coastal
Management, please contact Mr. Stephen Lane by emailing to stephen.lane ricdenr.Qov or write to him at:
NC Division of Coastal Management
Attn: Mr. Stephen Lane
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
You have ten days from receipt of this letter in which to submit written comments to the NC Division of
Coastal Management. No response shall be interpreted as no objection.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions regarding this work proposal. Thank you for
your consideration.
Enclosure
Sincerely,
Ponewall Mathis
Division Environmental Officer
5501 BARBADOS BLvD. CASTLE HAYNE. NC 28429
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

0 1,0002,000 4,000 6,000 8,000
Feet

a3
�"���'Zof�
Pender Bridge 117 �` MAY�`�1012
0 1,500 3,000 6,000 9,000 12,000
Feet

Panrlar Pririna 117 MAP 3 or -�
'Y ✓011
NC 53
—
OX6 e
\ j SR 1520 Old Maple Hill Road
Pender Bridge 117 Holly Shelter Creek
Pender Bridge 116
� V
0 1,500 3,000 6,000 9,000 12,000
Feet

Low/Minimal Impact Bridge Project Data Sheet
TIP NO
BD -51030
WBS Element No.
45349.1.15
County
Pender
Bridge Number
117
Replace Bridge 117 over Holly
Description
Shelter Creek
Basin
Cape Fear
Classification
C SW
Stream SIN
18-74-33
Type
perennial
Size width & depth)
58 X 6
Type
8 span bridge
Existing Structure Size
69X20
Suff. Rating
12.7
Type
2 Span Cored Slab Bridge
Proposed Structure
Size len thmidth out -out
1 00' X 33'
Stream USACE Impacts (LF)
0
NCDWQ Impacts LF
0
USACE Impacts (AC)
0
Wetlands Non 404 Impacts (AC)
0
CAMA Impacts SF
0
NC DWQ Buffers Impacts (SF)
No
Buffer Application Required (Y/N)
No
State Stormwater Permit Required (YIN)
No
Habitat
Unresolved
T&E Species Present
Bio Conclusion
Moratorium Type
Anadromous fish
Dates
Feb 15 - June 15
Native/Hatchery
No
Trout Waters Trout Species Present
No
Trout Conditions(YIN)
No
WRC Reviewer
CAMA AECs
Yes
Essential Fish Habitat /n
No
Nay. Opening
Maintain
USCG Permit
No
Historic Properties
No
Archaeological Resources
No
Tribal Lands
No
4 Resources
No
6(f) [LWCF] Resources
No
Wild and Scenic River
No
Federal Lands
No
TVA Area
No
FEMA Buyout
No
FEMA Flood Study
Yes
USTs Haz Mats
No
Relocatees
No
LAT
34.640556
Location
LONG
77.730417
Project Comments
Limited Detail FEMA Study
Completed by:
No
ngin,gbr,) Date
Division Environmenta Officer, Date
2/20/2012

No.
(From/To)
Size /Type
Wetlands
(ac)
Wetlands
(ac)
in Clearing
Wetlands in Wetlands
(ac) (ac)
in
Wetlands
(ac)
SW
impacts
(ac)
SW
impacts
(ac)
WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Impacts
Temp.
(ft)
Stream
Design
(ft)
1
Site
Station
Structure
Permanent
Fill In
Temp. Excavation Mechanized
Fill In
Hand
Clearing
Permanent
Temp.
Existing Existing
Channel Channel
Natural
-
TOTALS:
-
-
- -
-
-
-
-
-
-
Note: There are no proposed wetland or surface water impacts associated with this project.
y�
O
b
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PENDER COUNTY BRIDGE 117
BD -51030
SHEET OF 2/7/2012
No.
(From/To)
Size /Type
Wetlands
(ac)
Wetlands
(ac)
in Clearing
Wetlands in Wetlands
(ac) (ac)
in
Wetlands
(ac)
SW
impacts
(ac)
SW
impacts
(ac)
Impacts
Permanent
(ft)
Impacts
Temp.
(ft)
Stream
Design
(ft)
1
-L- 14+30 TO 15+30
21" Cored Slab Bridge
-
-
- -
-
-
-
-
-
-
TOTALS:
-
-
- -
-
-
-
-
-
-

Is' n1 ♦►I
■ ■ IIL ■ IIIIIIIIIIIII� HNTB NORTH CAROLINA, P.C.
30
20
10
0
-10
� I
MATERIAL TO BE REMOVED.
I
i
I i,
PI = 12+90.00 PI = 13+85.00
EL = 1599' EL = 16.67'
VC = Iia VC = 80'
K=97 K=155
DS = 50 DS = 60
1 R
-L- STA/2+.35.00
EL. 1622 WS EL: 5.6
----- - — SURVEY II -IS -II
------ f+101/58%
10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00
-L- JI AL
EL 16.76
IJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET NO.
BD -51030
4
RAY SHEET NO.
YRS
DWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
ENGINEER
CFS
_ BASE FREOUENCY = l00
INCOMPLF E
PLANS
DO NOT USR POR / W ACOUISITION
PRELIMIN R7'
PLANS
DO NOT USE F4 CONSTRUCTION
VO
OS = 50 OS = 60
-LA + DS
- N S O 50Ot7
- GRA
EL 16.05
(+)02!000% (-10.75007
r ----- --- - --------------
I i I (-JOJ2
IIIII�!I
�IIIIII�
- SIA
16.96
14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00
18+00
BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA
DESIGN DISCHARGE = 4100
CFS
DESIGN FREOUENCY = 25
YRS
DESIGN HW ELEVATION = 15J
FT
BASE DISCHARGE = 86/0
CFS
_ BASE FREOUENCY = l00
YRS
BASE HW ELEVATION = 2025
FT
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE = 4340
CFS
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY= 25 f+)
YRS
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION = 15B
FT
DATE OF SURVEY = 11 -l7 -ll
W.S. ELEVATION
AT DATE OF SURVEY = 5.6
FT
30
20
10
0
-10

:�1 I 111 ♦ \ 1 IE EjkW�w HNTB_NORTH CAROLINA, P.C.
VO
_ -_- - - - --- - PROFILE - -!= -- -' --
T - -- - -
1
MATERIAL TO PE REMOVED
j. � I . 11II.• II.I I I I I �- i i-1 ilk-iii i.I. j.I � .�
1 I
I
FDS
12+90.00 Pl = 13+85.00 Pl = 15+7500 Pl = 17+00.00
— -
--- �- = /599' EL l6bT EL = 17.05' EL = l6Jl'__--
j
I = 1/0' VC Sa VC = 80' Vc = 100'
I 97 K=/55 K=84 K=/60
30 =50 DS=60 OS=50 DS 60
N R BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA
IN R -L- A +5 DESIGN DISCHARGE = 4/00 CFS
-L- 3
TA.12+ 5.00 £L. 16.05 DESIGN FREOUENCY = 25 YRS
-
20 J- EL. /622
i � Ti ws EL.= 5.6 DESIGN HW ELEVATION = 15J FT
--------- - SURVEY B•15 -B
— — — _
— — — — — — — (+X17/58% (+ f -107500%
i BASE DISCHARGE = 66/0 CFS
__ =
---------r-------------------------BASE FREQUENCY - l00 YRS
BASE HW ELEVATION = 2025 FT
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE = 4340 CFS
10 _ —.- - - -.i__-- —f_ OVERTOPPING FREOUENCY= 25 (+1 YRS _
I 1 1 { OVERTOPPING ELEVATION = 15.6 FT ~j
1 1
I I �i
0 -- --1 - --- �-- --- I-- - 1N RI END BRIDG DATE OF SURVEY = 11-17-11 - _ 0
j I EL. 1676 r4+ -L- Al + W.S.ELEVATION
EL. 16.96 AT DATE OF SURVEY = 5.6 FT i
-10 - -
-10
`E
o
i
N If/ p
M,
10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00
Nc
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET NO.
BD -51030
1 4
RNI SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
HYDRAUUCS
ENGINEER
INCOMPLErE
DO NOT Use POR
PLANS
i/W ACOUJSITION
PRELIMINARY
DO NOT UN
PLANS
MNSTRUCTION
VO
_ -_- - - - --- - PROFILE - -!= -- -' --
T - -- - -
1
MATERIAL TO PE REMOVED
j. � I . 11II.• II.I I I I I �- i i-1 ilk-iii i.I. j.I � .�
1 I
I
FDS
12+90.00 Pl = 13+85.00 Pl = 15+7500 Pl = 17+00.00
— -
--- �- = /599' EL l6bT EL = 17.05' EL = l6Jl'__--
j
I = 1/0' VC Sa VC = 80' Vc = 100'
I 97 K=/55 K=84 K=/60
30 =50 DS=60 OS=50 DS 60
N R BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA
IN R -L- A +5 DESIGN DISCHARGE = 4/00 CFS
-L- 3
TA.12+ 5.00 £L. 16.05 DESIGN FREOUENCY = 25 YRS
-
20 J- EL. /622
i � Ti ws EL.= 5.6 DESIGN HW ELEVATION = 15J FT
--------- - SURVEY B•15 -B
— — — _
— — — — — — — (+X17/58% (+ f -107500%
i BASE DISCHARGE = 66/0 CFS
__ =
---------r-------------------------BASE FREQUENCY - l00 YRS
BASE HW ELEVATION = 2025 FT
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE = 4340 CFS
10 _ —.- - - -.i__-- —f_ OVERTOPPING FREOUENCY= 25 (+1 YRS _
I 1 1 { OVERTOPPING ELEVATION = 15.6 FT ~j
1 1
I I �i
0 -- --1 - --- �-- --- I-- - 1N RI END BRIDG DATE OF SURVEY = 11-17-11 - _ 0
j I EL. 1676 r4+ -L- Al + W.S.ELEVATION
EL. 16.96 AT DATE OF SURVEY = 5.6 FT i
-10 - -
-10
`E
o
i
N If/ p
M,
10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00
Nc

P/ Sta 12+33.52 P/ Sta 18+56.33
A = 74' 41'529 (LT) iS = 37 /5' 44.3' (RT)
D = 18' 43'26.8' D = 8' 46273*
L = 39894' L = 424.68'
T = 23352' T = 220.15'
R = 306.00' R = 653'00'
FOUR COUNTY ELECTRIC
P.O. BOX 667
1822 NC HWY 53 WEST
BURGAW, NC 28425
JOE DAIL
[phone]
[e-mail]
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
-L- STA 12+35.00
w
i
DATUM DESCRIPTION
I
-L- rL, JIU. IV VV -1
,.
END SHLO.
BERM GUTTER
PLAN
� n
G�INTB HNT NORTH CAROLINA, P.C.
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
343 E. Six forks Road, Suite 200 BD -5/030 UBO-!
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
NC License No: C-1554 &W SHEET NO.
"I
30
DESIGN DISCHARGE = 4100
-L- STA15+3123
DESIGN FREQUENCY = 25
BEGIN GRADE
DESIGN HW ELEVATION = 15J
BEGIN SHLD.
-L- STA/2+35.
CFS'
20
10
EL 1622
---------------------
BASE HW ELEVATION = 2025
BERM GUTTER
0
BEGIN SHLD.
c
o
r
n
-10
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION = 15.6
0
� M
rya0
DATE OF SURVEY = 1I-17-11
TWO BAR BERM GUTTER
METAL RaL STA+38JLT
O �
N M
ELECTRICAL CONDUCTOR
AT DATE OF SURVEY = 5.6
M
M 1!)
10+00 11+00 12+00
PLAN
� n
G�INTB HNT NORTH CAROLINA, P.C.
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
343 E. Six forks Road, Suite 200 BD -5/030 UBO-!
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
NC License No: C-1554 &W SHEET NO.
"I
PI = 12+90.00 PI = 13+85.00
EL = 1599' EL = 16E7'
VC = Ila VC = 80'
K=97 K=155
DS = 50 DS = 60
WS EL.= 5.6
SURVEY 11-15-11
(+>07158%
----- --
-L- J I A
EL 1676
13+00 14+00
PROFILE
Pl = 15+75.00 PI = 17+00'00
EL = 17.05' EL = 160'
VC = /Oa
K=84 K=160
OS = 50 DS = 60
(-10.75
) / H.
1696
15+00 16+00 17+00
18+00
BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA
STA+07 LT
DESIGN DISCHARGE = 4100
-L- STA15+3123
DESIGN FREQUENCY = 25
YRS
DESIGN HW ELEVATION = 15J
BEGIN SHLD.
BASE DISCHARGE = 8610
CFS'
BASE FREQUENCY = /00
YRS,
BASE HW ELEVATION = 2025
BERM GUTTER
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE= 4340
BEGIN SHLD.
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY= 25 (+)
REMOVE AND REINSTALL
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION = 15.6
- STA +012 LT
DATE OF SURVEY = 1I-17-11
TWO BAR BERM GUTTER
METAL RaL STA+38JLT
W.S. ELEVATION
ELECTRICAL CONDUCTOR
AT DATE OF SURVEY = 5.6
-L- PT Stc.13+98.94
+00� -L- END APP. SLAB
L
�'30w
38.00 LT -L- STA.15+42.19
+50.00 -L-
0
END SHLD.
BERM GUTTER
LT
38,W LT
y
/ STA +50B J.T
- -
L PC Sta. 16+36.18
0401
TF\T�
420
lit I
iw WAq
vY
:.
r
BEGIN SHL7J. E-
I` E e
TAa£R r
BERM GUTTER 040
ST A+09.4 RT
t0D0' R L-
EX/S ; ING
15' RCP -111
+10.00; -L-
\40.0tY
END SHLD. R7
BERM GUTTER
4ODA1'
ETA. +58B RT
-
CLASS 'B' RIP -RAP
EST. I TON
EST.5 SYFF
'+Fi0.00 -L-'-
JUXxy RT
40,00' RT
BEGIN SHLD.
BERM GUTTER
.' STA +463 RT
ASS 'IP RIP -RAP
IEND PROJECT BD -51030
\
3 END CONSTRUCTION
BEGIN APP. SLAB
i
tp4
`/
-L- STA14+1781
-L- STA 17+50'00
f HLD.
40, Rr
,.
BERM NIR
.. ..
STA t2l9 RTTE-,_
ms
_
BEGIN BRIDGE
-L- STA14+28.77
PI = 12+90.00 PI = 13+85.00
EL = 1599' EL = 16E7'
VC = Ila VC = 80'
K=97 K=155
DS = 50 DS = 60
WS EL.= 5.6
SURVEY 11-15-11
(+>07158%
----- --
-L- J I A
EL 1676
13+00 14+00
PROFILE
Pl = 15+75.00 PI = 17+00'00
EL = 17.05' EL = 160'
VC = /Oa
K=84 K=160
OS = 50 DS = 60
(-10.75
) / H.
1696
15+00 16+00 17+00
18+00
BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA
DESIGN DISCHARGE = 4100
CFS
DESIGN FREQUENCY = 25
YRS
DESIGN HW ELEVATION = 15J
FT
BASE DISCHARGE = 8610
CFS'
BASE FREQUENCY = /00
YRS,
BASE HW ELEVATION = 2025
FT
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE= 4340
CFS
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY= 25 (+)
YRS
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION = 15.6
FT
DATE OF SURVEY = 1I-17-11
W.S. ELEVATION
AT DATE OF SURVEY = 5.6
FT
30
20
10
0
-10

z
z
0
_L_ .
Pl Sto 12+33.52 PI Stc 18+56.33 I
L = 74' 4Y 52.9' (LT) L = 37' 15' 44.3` (RT)
D = 18' 43' 26.8" D = 84627.3'
L = 398.94' L = 42468'
T = 23352' T = 22OJ5'
R = 306A0' R = 653.00'
L- rL. Jlu. wrvvvv
AT&T
102 NORTH FORTH STREET
WILMINGTON, NC 28401
SHANNON COSTON END SHLID.
[phone] BERM GLITTER,
SrA+137',IT
[e-mail] BEGIN SHLD.
BERM GUTTER
STA 1012 IT
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
-L- STA 12+35.00
30
20
10
0
-10
-L - PT Sto. 13+9894
0
?30 Ij
F r�• ��
_... gaol
EL /622
---------------------
oQo
N �
12 10+00 11+00
o;
12+00
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
PLAN�HNTWN"C4NTB NORTH CAROLINA, P.SuBD-51030 UBO -2
3 E. Six Forks RoadSuite 200aleigh, North Carolina 27609 License No: C-1554 RM' SHEET NO.
0,
END BRIDGE
-L- STA15+3123 �- PROPOSED BURIED ROUTES
BEGIN SHLD.
rTWO BAR BERM GUTTER -�— EXISTING BURIED CABLE `
METAL RAIL STA +38 LT -r .�_ oc! nn nQ q/
Som -t- END APP. SLAB E
38Dau -L- STA15+42J9 +sD.Go -L- c _ `�
END SHLD. 3800'LT (�(,�
BERM GUTTER -L- PC Sta. 16+36J8
E E TA 4505 �7
jr
W
BEG!N SHLD.-J � E--- -E k� BEP502L7L''ER i�
STAM+D.°.4 RTR 040 +8 fXiS,*�NC
15' RCP_1111 •- I END SHLD. 40MI FT
U
+10'� t _ BERM GUTTER
40.0,7 RT I STA +58B PT
CLASS 'B' RIP -RAP '60!00 -L-BEGIN SHLO.
EST. I TON '�0
BERM GUTTER END PROJECT BD -5/030
- STA RT
EST.5 SYFF 40.07 RT END CONSTRUCTION
CLASS 'II' RIP -RAP
BEGIN APP. SLAB +24A0 -L-
05
-L= STA14+p.81-L- STA 17+50.00
END SHLD.
BERM�G(ATER
STA+2/9 RT. a.. , .•r.
BEGIN BRIDGE
-L- STA14+28.77
PI[
= 12+9000 PI = /3+8500
EL = 1599 EL = 1667'
vC =Ila vc = sa
K=97 K=155
DS=50 DS 60
WS EL.= 5.6
SURVEY II 15-11
-L- JI K
EL 1676
13+00 14+00
PROFILE
15+00
PI = 15+75.00 P'=/7+100.00
EL =1705' EL = l6JI'
vc = as
VC = l00'
K=84 K=160
DS = 50 DS = 60
-L- -')I K If rJV.IJU
EL 16.05
(-J0.7500%
-L- JI ti
EL 1696
16+00 17+00
18+00
BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA
DESIGN DISCHARGE = 4/00
CFS
DESIGN FREQUENCY = 25
YRS
DESIGN HW ELEVATION = 15J
FT
BASE DISCHARGE = 86/0
CFS
BASE FREQUENCY = l00
YRS
BASE HW ELEVATION = 2025
FT
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE = 4340
CFS
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY= 25 (+)
YRS
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION = 156
FT
DATE OF SURVEY = 11-17-11
W.S. ELEVATION
AT DATE OF SURVEY = 56
FT
30
20
10
0
-10

fCEIyED
MAY 0 9 2012
JDCU A, Ci rj,

BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE
GOVERNOR
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
June 1, 2012
EUGENE A. CONTI, JR.
SECRETARY
Stephen Lane RECEIVED
Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave.
Morehead City, NC 28557 �i JUN 0 4 2012
SUBJECT: Return Receipts for Adjacent Riparian Property Owner Notifications for 6
Application for CAMA General Permits .2300 and .1600 for DCM'3'I1-ID CITY
Replacement of Pender County Bridge # 117 & associated Utility Line Work on
SR 1520 Old Maple Hill Road approximately 2.5 mile SW of NC 50
Pender County, BD -51030, WBS # 45349.1.15
Dear Mr. Lane:
Please find enclosed the return receipt green cards that I have received to date from the adjacent riparian property
owner notifications for the Pender County Bridge #117 replacement project.
Please let me know if you need additional information in this regard. Thank you for your help with this project.
Enclosures
Sincerely,
Stonewall Mathis
Division 3 Environmental Officer
5501 BARBADos BLVD. CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

�❑ Agent
fete A. Sign tune
fete items 1, 2, and S. is d comp ��� Addressee
■ Comp is desired. X .
item 4 if Restricted Delivery • prrr�ed Na e) G. late of C livery ;
■ print your name and address on the reverse $ Received by ( J �.
so that we can return the card to you. P A o s
■ Attach this card to the back t the maaipiece. D IS delivery address different from tem 1 No
or on the (rant if space p if Y1 s. enter delivery address below
I. Article Addressed to: A �
S
pat,t.l 6-1 M yl
Pig'
3, 1 0 type ❑ Press Mail
Mia p 1 Certified Maif
Registered Return Receipt for Merchandise
p insured Mail 0 C.O.D.
Fee}
4. Restricted Delivery?fFxtra O Yes
�ntia 1870
oan 9aon 8896
Q. Article Number 102596-02-M-1 540
frransfer from service label} Domestic Return Receipt
2oo4
PS Form 3811, Fe rua

0
UNITED'STKTE5 S'rAL ,K `•'"'^a "g P
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box
N. C. Department of Transportation
Division Three Office
5501 Barbados Blvd.
Castle Hayne, NC 28429
17711}ittltili l�1117}I iit31�li1t ��111 i77 fi7111li itittl�}!1�3}}
w

UNITED STATES POSTAL.SERVICE First -Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
USPS
Permit No. G-10
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
N. C. Department of Transportation
Division Three Office
5501 Barbados Blvd.
Castle Hayne, NC 28429
MAY 10 2U'12
i11J�1i�11„1111�11�I1�111,1E111DI'U I N11 1 FFIr
UNITED S (A7fi5'1'(?SiAL �f.F�111G� r :` ^� : k��`'� First.Glasa•nQail
'•�:a�':.t;:;:,�� 31 ;;:iY7F�e0�i�;..; :'��.�s •� � ' PbS}'�d@s:�?aid
Permit No. G-10
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
N. C. Department of Transportation
Division Three Office
5501 Barbados Blvd.
Castle Mayne, NC 28429
L
{11{11{11111hL 11 fit II11111h i111111fif1l1111 1111 n He'' „
v
a
— 03 O
N -6 o
cv y Z
rn
�yaIf
FL a.
w
0
S
a
LU
J
i1
0
U.1
U)
0
w
r
z
D
X
0
A
U)
a
tJ
c
CL ” >
ONO
c c�
co p
c�a
H a o Z
m-0
E
o
0 'r:
a
ca
0 c @ ry
� T
c)
:3
:3t
O
.N r+ v
[O � a+
>'
= L1 Ln m
c
Q u
O'
m
V
z
�-
�,n
c
0

s
'
COMPLETE THWS'SECTION ON DEUVERY'
M Complete items 1, 2, and 3, Also complete
AM(-(�
Agent
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
-6S.❑
'
EJ Addressee
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
g Received by{ Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery
M Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
4 tcL" t ce- (A-) t ( (vti
i'or
on the front if space permits.
D. is delivery addressdifferentf to
13 Yes
1. Article Addressed to:
�,1,` llv��y111-�,� It-��ti}15�•�.� � 1-�
if YES, enter deliver/ address below:
ry
0 No
�t lr1.r If f0c > 1
3. S ice Type
ertif(ed Mail 0 Express Matt
Eiiiiii❑
Registered Return Receipt for Merchandise
0 Insured Mail C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee)
0 Yes
2. Article Number 7070
7870 0002 9000 8902
(rhansfer from service lobe() _
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt
102595.02-M-1540
a Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
• Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
-- I a 5(,(
L='arm) I'kW* 5 ,
iA
pzy5e Pit' C-
A. Signature
X
El Agent
P,/"/- cry ❑ Addressee
B. Rive y (Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery
a- V -0-
D. Is delivery address different from Item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: 13 No
3. S rce Type
Wed Mail press Mail
0 Registered/turn Receipt for Merchandise
Ci Insured Mall � C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) C7 Yes
2. Article Number 7010 1870 0002 9000 8919
((ransfer from service label)
1 PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540
Y+
Ir
Lo
rD
ED
l�
El-
rU
0
rj
O
t�-
a
0
0
!ti
a
V
Cr
E
ccc
i3
E
N

BRIDGE SURVEY & HYDRAULIC DESIGN REPORTC6tvi1
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS }' .9 ?01[
HYDRAULICS UNIT
,a
RALEIGH, N. C.
:d
o I)CAT-MUD CITY
M;r
O'N
14+8D--- -L-
---------------
HOLLY
L-
45 ----- 15
w LD. No. BD -51030---- Protect No. Pro). Station -
N;U
u�i County FENDER---_---__- Stream__________________HOLLY SHELTER CREEK Stru.No.-- all7
r w
= On Highway SR -1520 - Between ---------- -SR 1522------------ and ---- NG_HWY_5p
(OLO MAPLE HILL RD.) (SHAW HWY}
ORecommended Structure 1_ @_ - 55'- W•_1-@ _ _45' -.0'; 21' CORED_ SLAS,_ TOTAL -BRIDGE LENGTH=100',_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ BRIDGE RAIL SFD._NO.-BMR3' NO DECK ORAiNS
-TOTAL BR -D------ TH=33--_0;- 2 ------ENO- SENT C----------- -----_---
m---------------•------------------------
U -
Existing Crossing. EXISTING LOCATION ----------
o Recommended Location is At,
a
Recommended Width of Roadway 30' -6' -------_ ROADWAY _--__---__-_ Skew ----------- 75--_--_-__----
Y
o: Bench Mark Is __ ---------------------------------
BASELINE CAP '-BL= I' ON-_-L--STA, 10+87,76 -----------------
------ -
M17.92_------ ft Datum: _____ IJ -88
'o --- Elev--------------
--•---
zmporary Crossin
Te NOT REQUIRED OFF SiTE DETOUR PROVIDED ____________________________________
x;
N NTB HNTB NORTH CAROLINA, P.C.
343 E. 31x Forks na ed, Suite 200
Raleigh North Carolina 27609
NC LicenSe No: C-1554
Designed by: --- - ------------------------------------------
Assisted by:.. _ .PHP_ ROPERS, -PES
Project Engineer: .... JAMES A.SYRD,PE________________ I
CD
V �4---- Date .. �Zq(-�Z _
Reviewed by: ---- --------- - _u -U_: - 11 -F
I
15764 {rl
IG I
ES.A.%,0�d.
'Mari e�:vs

Mathis, Stonewall D
From: Mathis, Stonewall D
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 11:43 AM
To: Glynn, Amanda T
Cc: Mathis, Stonewall D; Lane, Stephen; Baker, Jessi E; Wilson, Travis W.
Subject: BD -51030 Pender County Bridge 117
Hey Mandy,
I have spoken with both Travis Wilson and Jessi Baker today by phone and both say that they will not require a
moratorium at Pender County Bridge 117.
RzcriVEn
Stoney MAY
1
]DcM- CITY
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
parties.

� North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 1=
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Amanda T. Glynn, P.E.
Division Bridge Program Manager, NCDOT
I RftO
FROM: Travis Wilson, Highway Project Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
�i n 9 2�J�
DATE: July 8, 2011
SUBJECT: Division 3 Bridge Replacements
Biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the
information provided and have the following preliminary comments on the subject project. Our
comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act
(42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661-667d).
Our standard recommendations for bridge replacement projects of this scope are as
follows:
1. We generally prefer spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not require
work within the stream and do not require stream channel realignment. The horizontal
and vertical clearances provided by bridges allows for human and wildlife passage
beneath the structure, does not block fish passage, and does not block navigation by
canoeists and boaters.
2. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream.
3. Live concrete should not be allowed to contact the water in or entering into the stream.
4. If possible, bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream.
5. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, they should be removed back to
original ground elevations immediately upon the completion of the project. Disturbed
areas should be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and native tree species should
be planted with a spacing of not more than 10'x10'. If possible, when using temporary
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

Bridge Memo Page 2 July 8, 2011
structures the area should be cleared but not grubbed. Clearing the area with chain
saws, mowers, bush -hogs, or other mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and
root mat intact, allows the area to revegetate naturally and minimizes disturbed soil.
6. A clear bank (riprap free) area of at least 10 feet should remain on each side of the
steam underneath the bridge.
7. In trout waters, the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission reviews all U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers nationwide and general `404' permits. We have the option of
requesting additional measures to protect trout and trout habitat and we can
recommend that the project require an individual `404' permit.
8. In streams that contain threatened or endangered species, NCDOT biologist Mr.
Logan Williams should be notified. Special measures to protect these sensitive species
may be required. NCDOT should also contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for
information on requirements of the Endangered Species Act as it relates to the project.
9. In streams that are used by anadromous fish, the NCDOT official policy entitled
"Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage (May 12, 1997)" should
be followed.
10. Sedimentation and erosion control measures sufficient to protect aquatic resources
must be implemented prior to any ground disturbing activities. Structures should be
maintained regularly, especially following rainfall events.
11. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil
within 15 days of ground disturbing activities to provide long-term erosion control.
12. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area.
Sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams, or other diversion structures should be used where
possible to prevent excavation in flowing water.
13. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in
order to minimize sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other
pollutants into streams.
14. Only clean, sediment -free rock should be used as temporary fill (causeways), and
should be removed without excessive disturbance of the natural stream bottom when
construction is completed.
15. During subsurface investigations, equipment should be inspected daily and
maintained to prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants,
hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
If corrugated metal pipe arches, reinforced concrete pipes, or concrete box culverts are
used:
1. The culvert must be designed to allow for aquatic life and fish passage. Generally, the
culvert or pipe invert should be buried at least 1 foot below the natural streambed
(measured from the natural thalweg depth). If multiple barrels are required, barrels
other than the base flow barrel(s) should be placed on or near stream bankfull or
floodplain bench elevation (similar to Lyonsfield design). These should be

Bridge Memo Page 3 July 8, 2011
reconnected to floodplain benches as appropriate. This may be accomplished by
utilizing sills on the upstream and downstream ends to restrict or divert flow to the
base flow barrel(s). Silled barrels should be filled with sediment so as not to cause
noxious or mosquito breeding conditions. Sufficient water depth should be provided
in the base flow barrel(s) during low flows to accommodate fish movement. If
culverts are longer than 40-50 linear feet, alternating or notched baffles should be
installed in a manner that mimics existing stream pattern. This should enhance
aquatic life passage: 1) by depositing sediments in the barrel, 2) by maintaining
channel depth and flow regimes, and 3) by providing resting places for fish and other
aquatic organisms. In essence, base flow barrel(s) should provide a continuum of
water depth and channel width without substantial modifications of velocity.
2. If multiple pipes or cells are used, at least one pipe or box should be designed to
remain dry during normal flows to allow for wildlife passage.
3. Culverts or pipes should be situated along the existing channel alignment whenever
possible to avoid channel realignment. Widening the stream channel must be avoided.
Stream channel widening at the inlet or outlet end of structures typically decreases
water velocity causing sediment deposition that requires increased maintenance and
disrupts aquatic life passage.
4. Riprap should not be placed in the active thalweg channel or placed in the streambed
in a manner that precludes aquatic life passage. Bioengineering boulders or structures
should be professionally designed, sized, and installed.
In most cases, we prefer the replacement of the existing structure at the same location
with road closure. If road closure is not feasible, a temporary detour should be designed and
located to avoid wetland impacts, minimize the need for clearing and to avoid destabilizing
stream banks. If the structure will be on a new alignment, the old structure should be removed
and the approach fills removed from the 100 -year floodplain. Approach fills should be removed
down to the natural ground elevation. The area should be stabilized with grass and planted with
native tree species. If the area reclaimed was previously wetlands, NCDOT should restore the
area to wetlands. If successful, the site may be utilized as mitigation for the subject project or
other projects in the watershed.
Project specific comments:
BD- 51030 Pender County, bridge number 117: We recommend replacing this bridge with a
bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
BD- 5103P Onslow County, bridge number 226: This area is characterized by higher salinity
water primarily supporting species under the jurisdiction of the NC Division of Marine Fisheries;
therefore NCDOT should coordinate with NCDMF to address impacts to aquatic species. We
recommend replacing this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
BD- 5103Q Duplin County, bridge number 154: We recommend replacing this bridge with a
bridge. Standard recommendations apply.

Bridge Memo Page 4 July 8, 2011
BD- 5103R Brunswick County, bridge number 64: We recommend replacing this bridge with a
bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
BD- 5103S Sampson County, bridge number 77: We recommend replacing this bridge with a
bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
BD- 5103T Sampson County, bridge number 78: We recommend replacing this bridge with a
bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
If you need further assistance or information on NCWRC concerns regarding bridge
replacements, please contact me at [phone]. Thank you for the opportunity to review and
comment on this project.

TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
524 South New Hope Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27610
919-212-1760 (0) / 919-212-1707 (F)
www.environmentalservices.com
MEMORANDUM �� b
ti%Y ®g
James Byrd
Robert Turnbull Com,
July 11, 2011
T.I.P. BD -51030 - Pender 117
Environmental Services, Inc., (ESI) has completed the jurisdictional wetland and surface water
delineation for Pender County Bridge #117. The project study area is located on Old Maple Hill
Road (SR 1520) over Holly Shelter Creek.
One (1) Section 404 jurisdictional wetland and one (1) jurisdictional stream channel (Holly
Shelter Creek) were flagged per U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and N.C. Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) criteria. No coastal wetlands, as defined by the Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA), were present within the project study area. The jurisdictional
wetland is abutting Holly Shelter Creek outside of the project study area. Normal high water
elevation was marked with an orange flag near flag SA -2A. The attached jurisdictional layout
depicts the approximate location of the jurisdictional features. It is our understanding that these
features will be located via traditional survey. The attached layout is intended to be used by your
surveyor to aid in locating the wetland and stream flagging. Please note that the delineation
results are considered preliminary pending USACE concurrence.

T.I.P. BD -51030 (Pender 117)
Pender County, NC
Environmental Services, Inc.
July 11, 2011
.Turisdictional Wetlands (blue/oink & black strived flagging)
Flag
Flagging
Location
Comments
Designation
Se uence
Location
Comments
Designation
Se uence
Both sides of
SA
1-6, 1 A -6A
Northwest of
WA
1-4
existing bridge
Jurisdictional Streams (blue/orange flagging)
Flag
Flagging
Location
Comments
Designation
Se uence
Both sides of
SA
1-6, 1 A -6A
existing bridge
04.

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION 1: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State:NC County/parish/borough: Pender City:
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 34.63796° N, Long. -77.73299° 1W.
Universal Transverse Mercator: 18S 249482 3836291
Name of nearest waterbody: Holly Shelter Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TN W) into which the aquatic resource flows: Northeast Cape Fear River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 030300007
Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is'are available upon request.
Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites. disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
�] Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There 'Pick List "navigable wagers of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RNA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
❑ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or maybe susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "Raters oft/re CCS" within Clean A ater Act (C WA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required)
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply):
TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Relatively permanent waters (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNA's
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non -wetland waters: 100 linear feet: 35 width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: > 0.1 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 11987 Delineation ;Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. 'Von -regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
❑ Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional
Explain:
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TN W and that typically (lows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally'
(e.g., typically 3 months).
` Supporting documentation is presented in Section 111.F.

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TN A's and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section II1.A.1 and Section I11.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.I and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non -navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section I II.D.4.
.4 wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(f) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: M& List
Drainage area: Jpkk List
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows throughkkTt tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters arc Pick List river miles from RPW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5:
Tributary stream order, if known:
Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales. ditches, Hashes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through die review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man-made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man -altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: 11'iek last.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type/'/o cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Pick List
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: Pick List
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Pick List. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑
❑ shelving
❑
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
❑ sediment deposition
❑
❑ water staining
❑
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM' Explain:.
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted tloA events
abrupt change in plant community
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
(] High Tide Line indicated by: ❑ Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum.
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings;
❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
"A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
Abid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife di-,ersity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: (Pick List. Explain:
Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: PiekjUst. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are;Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick -List floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by ani wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that arc present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself; then go to Section 111.D:
Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section IIID:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPN'. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section 11I.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: Holly Shelter Creek is a large, and order perennial stream.
El Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each )ear) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the reNiew area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: 100 linear feet 35 width (ft).
Q Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Non-RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section 1II.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
�] Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
19 Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW: No non -jurisdictional areas observed between wetland and RPV1'.
0 Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributaq
seasonal in Section 111.B and rationale in Section JII.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: >0.1 acres.
V1 etlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section IiI.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.'
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S..- or
❑ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
❑ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED ]INTERSTATE OR INTRA -STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):10
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign tra%clers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
'See Footnote # 3.
' To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandunc Regarding CWA Act Jurisdicdon Followink, Rapanos.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply).
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
NON -JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
© If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in " SW,4NCC." the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
❑ Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
❑ Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of nater for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
❑ Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus' standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): Iinear feet, width (ft).
❑ Lakes ponds: acres.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicanticonsultant.
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
Q Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
BCorps navigable waters' study:
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:Maple Hill, NC 1:24000.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:Soil Survey of Pender County, NC.
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:Maple Hill, NC.
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable/supporting case law:
❑ Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: T.I.P. BD -51030 (Pender 117) City/County: Pender Sampling Date: 7/5/2011
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State. NC Sampling Point: WA2
Investigator(s): Environmental Services, Inc. (RT) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%) 14%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat. 34.63796 Long: -77-73299 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Muckalee loam NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ✓ , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
✓ No within a Wetland? Yes
Remarks:
Mowed powerline easement/roadside
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (69)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Marl Deposits (815) (LRR U)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) Other (Explain in Remarks)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No _� Depth (inches) n/a
Water Table Present? Yes
No ✓ Depth (inches): >20
Saturation Present? Yes
No ✓ Depth (inches): >20
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections). if available:
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Interim Version

VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WA2
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot sizes: 30'
) % Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
2.
3.
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
0
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum ( 30' )
OBL species x 1 =
1
FACW species x 2 =
2
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
3
q
UPL species x 5 =
5
Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
7.
0
=Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
✓ Dominance Test is >50%
Shrub Stratum ( 30' )
1. Liguidambar styraciflua
5
yes FAC
_ Prevalence Index is s3.0'
2
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
4
be present.
5.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
6
7
5
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum ( 30' )
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines.
1. Arundinaria glgantea
20
Ves OBL
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and
3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast
2. SCirpus Cyperinus 5 yes FACW
height (DBH).
3.
4.
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines.
5.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
6
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
7.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines.
8
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
9.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
11.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes
12.
woody plants, except woody vines, less than
25
= Total Cover
approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine Stratum ( 30' )
1
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5.
Vegetation
✓
0
= Total Cover
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point. WA2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) 1/6
Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks
0-20+ 2.5Y 4/2 95
10YR 4/6 5 C PL S
'Type: C=Concentration. D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains,
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3) _
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
_` 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _
Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8) _
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TIF 12) (LRR T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR O, P, T)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present.
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
�[ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gutt Coastal Plain Region — Interim Version

Tk;t ctrpt4-r
-ire vf1&,, l *a q l o;►•i.
JD►ti
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: T.I.P. BD -51030 (Pender 117) City/County. Pender Sampling Date: 7/5/2011
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WA2
Investigator(s): Environmental Services, Inc. (RT) Section Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%). 14%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 34.63796 Long: -77.73299 Datum.
Soil Map Unit Name: Muckalee loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ✓ , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No V/
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Vwithin a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks
mowed powerline easement/roadside
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (1319)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): n/a
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): >20
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): >20
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Interim Version

VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants.
� UPlard .
Sampling Point: WA2
egetation
0 = Total Cover Present? Yes No
observed, list morphological adaptations
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Prevalence Index = B/A =
7.
Tree Stratum (Plot sizes: 30'
) % Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0 =Total Cover
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
2
(A)
2.
— Prevalence Index is s3.0'
Total Number of Dominant
3
3.
Species Across All Strata:
2
(B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present
5.
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
100
(cVg)
6.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7,
0
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Herb Stratum ( 30' )
7.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
1 Arundinaria ctigantea
30
V FACW
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and
0 = Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
y FAC
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling Stratum ( 30' )
1.
3.
FACW species x 2 =
2.
FAC species x 3 =
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5.
3.
FACU species x4=
6,
4,
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
UPL species x 5 =
8
5
Column Totals: (A)
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
(B)
6.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes
12.
egetation
0 = Total Cover Present? Yes No
observed, list morphological adaptations
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version
Prevalence Index = B/A =
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0 =Total Cover
Shrub Stratum ( 30' )
✓ Dominance Test is >50%
1.
— Prevalence Index is s3.0'
2
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present
5.
6.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7,
0
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum ( 30' )
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
1 Arundinaria ctigantea
30
V FACW
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and
2 Festuca sop.
10
y FAC
3 in (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast
height (DBH).
3.
4.
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
6,
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
7.
8
9
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
10.
11.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes
12.
woody plants, except woody vines, less than
40
= Total Cover
approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine Stratum ( 30' )
1
Woody vine -AII woody vines, regardless of height.
2.
3.
4.
r
Hydrophytic
V
egetation
0 = Total Cover Present? Yes No
observed, list morphological adaptations
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absenc(
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture
0-4 10YR 4/2 100 Sand
4-20+ 10YR 6/2 100 Sand
vPt" SY-
104-1
Sampling Point: WA2
of indicators.)
Remarks
RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. `Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (Sg) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (1718) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T. U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
✓
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Interim Version

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: % S / � /
Project/Site:
Latitude:
Evaluator:i S1 L
County: j "
Longitude: _ 7 7. 7,72,; 9
Total Points:P
Stream Determination (circledrte)
Other I i 7
Stream is at least intermittent � � •
Ephemeral Intermittent',Perenni�l
e.g. Quad Name: liaplc Ni/i,
if 2 19 or perennial if Z 30'
-
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
_3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
'0 1
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
0.5
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
1�)
6. Depositional bars or benches
-0>
1
2
3
7, Recent alluvial deposits
Lob
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
`artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R Hvdroloov (Subtotal
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3.
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
6-
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
c1 ;
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.51>
2
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0:
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
Q
No = 0
Yes= 3
1.5
C. Bioloov (Subtotal = i i )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
'_3:)
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
_
23. Crayfish
Q
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.
25. Algae
X07
0.5
1 _
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0 j
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: a!G r 4 L -
Sketch:

USACE AID##
DWQ 4
Site 9 (indicate on attached map)
FETI STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for- the stream reach under assessment: / 1
1. Applicant's name: NC D0 I 2. Evaluator's name: a J
3. Date of evaluation: -7 �1 t
5. Name of stream: No 1 ti ,S�e 11,,, 6,-�f"4z
7. Approximate drainage area:
9. Length of reach evaluated:
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
4. Time of evaluation: 31191',
6. River basin:
8. Stream order: fJ
10. County: Pe- -�--
12. Subdivision name (if any
Latitude (ex. 34.372312): -39. . 6 3 7j9 itude (ex. -77.556611): % 7. % 3Z 17
Mcthod location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet '9riholAerial)_Photo% S Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmar s and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
111 �: 01.4 „, k -i-6
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: x r1+ A it -- z Y 4rT
16. Site conditions at time of visit: /y,""t
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (1 -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? �i� NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map?(YEPNO
21. Estimated watershed land use: _% Residential
`ZL% Forested
22. Bankfull width: • S !'t
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? AiiS) NO
% Commercial l 6) % Industrial 2-0 % Agricultural
% Cleared r Logged _% Other (
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): -S
�.
24. Channel slope down center of stream: 'Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) _Nloderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (' 10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity. and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): (1 h Comments:
Evaluator's Signature 'Z -7L- / - " __52_ Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06103. To Comment. please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
i - - -—f-LOR.EGION POINT I2.�.iNGE
I C'"ARACTERISTf('S F— -- ---I .,rr►aia
l irst ra-c l
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2
• ��asmi
r•reclment
; 1'foaruta�n
0-5
1(no
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
U-4
0-5 S
flow or saturation = 0; strop flow = Max oints)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
S
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration =max points)
i 3
Riparian zone
0 - 4
0-5
(no buffer = 0; cont gm s, wide buffer = maxpoints)0-6
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0 5
0-4
0 4
S
t
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges - maxpoints)
Groundwater discharge
s
U - 3
I 0--4
0- 4
3
(no discharge = 0; springs_s�s, wetlands, etc. --tnaxpoints)
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0--4
U 4
-2
0-211
�f
f °
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0 -5
0-4
0-2
S
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = maxpoints)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
3
(no wetlands = 0, large adiacent wetlands = maspoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0 - 4
0-3
(extensive channelization = 0; natmai meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
S) 0- 4
0^--
0--1
(extensive deposition= O, little or no sediment =max points)
1 1
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate _
0-4
0 - 5
--
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
0-5
S
1 12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
_�
0 5
0-4
�-
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & hanks = mai points
13
Presence of major bank failures
0 - 5 (
0-5
S
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = maxpoints)0-5
On
14
Root depth and density on banks
0- 3
0-4
0-5
Z
F
(no visible roots = 0, dense roots throughout =max points)
is
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
o—s
o- 4
o—s
S
(substantial impact =0, no evidence = maxpoints)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-poet complexes
-'
0-5
0 - 6
G
no riffles/ripples les or pools = 0; well-developed = maxpoints)0
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
C
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
/
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
(no shadingvegetation = 0; continuous canopy= max points)
_-5
19
Substrate embeddedness
I
144•
0-4
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 - 5
0-5
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types _max�Oints)
Presence of fish
0-40-4
G_
`
0- 4
no evidence = U; comrnon, numerous types = max points)
Evidence of wildlife use
23
i) -F n -S
0- S S
�no evtde>>ce = 0, abundant evidence mat ints
_____ _-__----__._.-- _ -- -. — po ) _--
;
latal taectts V00i+le
Irl I Itu)
100 41y
l irst ra-c l
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2

Project Tracking No. (Internal Use)
_.......................................................................................
(HA)11-07-0030 I
NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: BD -51030 county: Pender
WBS No: 45349.1.15 Document: PCE
F.A. No: Funding: State X Federal
NWP 3 and 12, WQC
3687 and 3819, CAMA
Federal (USACE) Permit Required? X Yes ❑ No Permit Type: GP 2300 and 1600
Project Description: Replace Bridge No. 117 on SR 1520 (Old Maple Hill Road)
over Holly Shelter Creek with off-site detour (presumed no improvements)
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions: HPOWeb reviewed on 10
August 2011 and yielded no NR, SL, LD, DE, or SS properties in the Area of Potential Effects (APE).
Pender County current GIS mapping and tax information indicated undeveloped and wooded properties in
APE. Constructed in 1956, Bridge No. 117 is a 69 -foot -long, eight -span, timber stringer/multi-beam
bridge and is not eligible for the National Register according to the NCDOT Historic Bridge Survey as it is
not historically, architecturally, or technologically significant. Google Maps "Street View" confirmed
absence of critical historic structures/landscapes in APE (viewed 10 August 2011).
No architectural survey is required for the project as currently defined.
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE: APE extends 200 feet to the N and S from
the center of the existing bridge and 100 feet to the E and W from the SR 1520 (Old Maple Hill Road)
centerline to encompass proposed construction activities. County GIS/tax materials and other visuals
support the absence of significant architectural resources. No National Register -listed or —eligible
properties are located within the APE.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: location map
FINDING BY NCDOT CULTURAL RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL
NO SURVEY REQUIRED — Historic Structures
NCDOT Cultural Resources Specialist
"No Surve.V neq„ired"jnrm jaa-Minor'lhm.cpormrion Projects as Uualijied in the 2007 Prut;ranunaric Agreement.
NCDOT Archaeolop, d, Historic Archireciure Groups
Date

NO SURVEY REQUMED FOR11•'I
PROJECT INFUF2MATiON
Projec•t A1o. BD -51030
R'13S No: 45319.1.15
unknom n
Federal (CSAC1:.) Perlllit Re vire
,r'rc'jea TraLklrrt; V0. (h?hWUJi i seI
11-07-0030
t urttrtt=: Pender•
t ocisment. Minimum Criteria Sheet
Funding., ❑ State Z federal
Dq Yes ❑ No Permit Tqw: Nationwide
Pro ect Description:Replacement cif Briclge No. l 1 " on .S'RI 5'(1 told Maple Ref) over Holly Sheller Creek
in Pander Carrier),'. Vor lh Carolina. This is a low impact bridge replacement Prujea to replace 1'enfic'r
Iirid re.' 1 f The et;istigq bridge is 69 feet long Iry 20 fee=t wvidv �:n d the proposed hrkd e is I iJlljt:el fang, 1>1'
ap roximmely 28 ec�t wide. 7'he APF shoidel he c•onsidered,1hr 200 fe at on larch sides cif the existing
bridge wit/tin the 6pft vwoe existing row. 117e bridge r plexement and associated road work w -ill he within
the existing row. I'llere lncry he need for easements far utility work however. Dieser woidd like=ly trernf
parallel ,vith the rv%v and affect u milJrnttrn wcit*h cif l pft. a,#acent to the row.
SUMM ARV OF C;U TURAL RESOU11C'ES RFVII+NV
Brie f des:-rlprion of review arricitles, results ofreviewv. and conclusions:
A ]Tial) review and site file search was conducted at the (Office of State Archaeology (OSA) oil friday,
August 5, 201 1. This work disclosed the location of no previously recorded archaeological sites wvitllin
the project APIs. the general project area, or within a five or more mile radius of the improvement area. A
review of Nwicinal Register of Historic Places kNRI1P) properties/districts was completed which
identified no such archacological listed properties within or ablating the APE/prt�ject area, In addition,
topograpl.uc mtrps, arclwa�'4710LQtCitl and 111SIt7l'ical ICfCfCRL'C.Fnat4'1•lals. USDA sail survey naps (BaB.Mk).
aerial photmaaphs (?ender County GIS), geologic maps, and the G000ie street view mala application %were
inspectedlutilized by tile cultural resource specialist to gauge art:haeological sett potential within the
project arca tend to assess the level of residential, agricultural. erosive, and other disturbances. These
various sources ilklstrtite that the project APE consists largely of uptrended fill materials utilized to
elevate the; existing SRI 520 roadway/partial right-of-way above tile. surrounding saturated and flooded
ground surfaces oi' I-foliy Shelter Creek floodplain. '1'lte -,western side of the road has been further impacted
by an above -ground utility line stretch the length oC the APE. directly adjacent to the ROW. As such,
archaceologocal site potential is very low for the project as proposed.
Cirit:f EX ,terrine n of why the available inforincition providers a reliable hasis for reasonably precllt-trnz
111(rt there we no rarrideltir]re'cl historic properries in thee .4PL'!
file diminutive nature Of the proposed low -impact replacementiconstructlon effort (in-place wwl all of] site
dctinn), along; -,with largely inundated and artificially upirended ground surfaces within and surrounding
tile curretltiv defined APL-' nate it vets unlikely that ane• significant archaeological resources will be
tlffccted the hridtle replacement prcyjcc( as currently proposed. No further archaeological investigation
is reconrm�mded.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
Ser. attached; ❑' tidap(s) (; Previous Sur%�v 1nt�) [ Pltototi ❑C'orrespondence
Photocopy of Count., Survew Notes
•.. !'_r.,. ..u!n..,,i�•,.nr 7.!: ,1 Lniar �.�•:.��:.•;.: •. .. �.�..drn r7a :'!':"•r•... .. r••n... i. i i..

FINDING BV NCDOT CULTURAL RESOURCES PROFFSSIONAL
?,4
, S V L-
�L � Y RFS)
.j'R� _ t]IRED
NICDOICLI11111'.11 Resource~ Specialist
Peqfw-'.i *,;,, " , "', .'t .1 ::;'ll: - 'thl-
All
1XII.0

daf FATE' o
n o+a
r@ puM W6'r
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE
GOVERNOR
May 7, 2012
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Mr. Brad Shaver
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
EUGENE A. CONTI, JR.
SECRETARY
Subject: Permit Application for Nationwide Permit 12 for Section 10 considerations for
Power Line Work associated with Low Impact Bridge Replacement BD -51030
Pender County Bridge #117, WBS # 45349.1.1
Dear Mr. Shaver:
The NC Department of Transportation proposes to replace Pender County Bridge # 117 under the
Low Impact Bridge Program. NCDOT proposes no 404 impacts as a result of this project.
However, the water body at this location is Holly Shelter Creek which is a Section 10 water.
NCDOT proposes to temporarily remove a power line for construction purposes as there would
otherwise be a conflict during construction and replace the power line on the existing poles post
construction. The subject power line crosses over Holly Shelter Creek. NCDOT proposes to
perform this work under USACE Nationwide Permit 12. NCDOT is applying for CAMA
General Permit .2300 for the bridge replacement and CAMA General Permit .1600 for the utility
line work for both the power line work described above and AT&T utility line work. The AT&T
utility line work associated with this project will not cross over, under, or through Holly Shelter
Creek and therefore is not part of this Nationwide 12 application request. Please see the attached
copy of the entire application package that is being sent to the NC Division of Coastal
Management. Please let this cover letter to you and the copy of the package to the NC Division
of Coastal Management serve as the PCN for the Nationwide 12.
Thank you for all your help working through this process. Please do not hesitate to contact me if
you have any questions in this regard.
Sincerely,
Stonewall athis PA�)
Division Environmental Officer
Attachments
Cc: Amanda Glynn, P.E., Division Bridge Engineer
Stephen Lane, NC Division of Coastal Management
Mason Herndon, NC Division of Water Quality
5501 Barbados Blvd. Castle Hayne, NC 28429 [phone]; [phone] (fax)

4
&V
-PROFILE
4
20
1
--------------- --------------------- --,-
-- -I--
------- ----------
--_------------
(-1Q12 0%
10
10
0
0
BEGIN BRIDGE
END BRIDGE
-L- STA.14+30.00
-L- STA.15+30.00
EL. 16.76
EL 16.96
BD -51030
PENDER COUNTY BRIDGE 117
SR 1520
AERIAL POWER LINE CLEARANCE
SCALE:
1'=10' (VERTICAL)
1'=50' (HORIZONTAL)
-
-
SHEET OF
12+00 13+00 14+00
15+00
16+00
17+00 18+00

Lane, Stephen
From: Mathis, Stonewall D
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 10:13 AM
To: Shaver, Brad E SAW
Cc: Mathis, Stonewall D; Lane, Stephen; Herndon, Mason
Subject: RE: BD -51030
Attachments: BD51030_aerial_clearance. pdf
Hey Brad,
The power line will be a minimum of 30 feet above the bridge and the voltage will be 7200 volts (7.2 kilovolts); the
preceding information was obtained from Four County Electric. Please see the attached drawing in this regard. I will be
glad to send you a hardcopy of this correspondence and drawing if you like, please let me know.
Please let me know if you need additional information in regard to this project. Thank you for your help.
Stoney
From: Shaver, Brad E SAW[ma ilto:Brad. E.Shaver(&usace.army.mil]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 12:01 PM
To: Mathis, Stonewall D
Subject: BD -51030
Stoney,
I hate to send this and then run but I wanted you to have it. For this section 10 crossing being overhead utility I must
confirm that the project is in compliance with regional conditions. In the package I don't see a cross section to tell how
high above the water the line will be or the voltage of the line for sag calculation. Not to mention that information is
necessary as a new requirement to pass along to Dept of Defense.
Can you find out this information?
See condition below:
4.1.5. The minimum clearance*(see NOTE in 4.3.6.) for aerial communication lines, or any lines not transmitting
electrical power, will be ten (10) feet above the clearance required for nearby stationary bridges as established by the
U.S. Coast Guard. In the event the U.S. Coast Guard has not established a bridge clearance, minimum vertical
clearances for power and aerial lines will not be less than required by Section 23, Rule 232, of the latest revision of
the National Electrical Safety Code (ANSI C2). Clearances will not be less than shown in Table 232-1, Item 7, ANSI
C2. 29
4.1.6. The minimum clearance* for an aerial
line, transmitting electrical power, is based
on the low point of the line under conditions
that produce the greatest sag, taking into Minimum
consideration temperature, load, wind, Clearance
length or span and the type of supports. The
minimum clearance for an aerial electrical
power transmission line crossing navigable
waters of the US shall be governed by the

We can talk more about Monday if you have any questions,
Brad
Brad E Shaver
Project Manager
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Ave
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]
Fax# [phone]
The Wilmington District is commited to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisifaction Survey located at our website at
http://Per2.nwp.usace.army.mil/survey.html to complete the survey online.
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
7
system voltage, as indicated below:
Nominal System
Above Bridge
Clearance (Ns
Voltage, kilovolt
Established by
the U.S. Coast
Guard)
115 and below
20 feet
138
22
161
24
230
26
350
30
500
35
700
42
750 to 765
45
We can talk more about Monday if you have any questions,
Brad
Brad E Shaver
Project Manager
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Ave
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]
Fax# [phone]
The Wilmington District is commited to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisifaction Survey located at our website at
http://Per2.nwp.usace.army.mil/survey.html to complete the survey online.
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
7