57916_TOWN OF BELHAVEN_20121107

Type of Project/ Activity
Pier (dock) length
Platform(s)
Finger pier(s)
Groin length
number
Bulkhead/ Riprap length
avg distance offshore
max distance offshore
Basin, channel
cubic yards_
Boat ramp
Boathouse/ Boatlift
Beach Bulldozi
Other
Shoreline Length
SAV: not sure yes no
Sandbags: not sure yes no
Moratorium: n/a yes no
Photos: yes no
Waiver Attached: yes no
A building permit may be required by: ❑ See note on back regarding River Basin rules.
Notes/ Special Conditions
Agent or Applicant Printed Name
Permit Officer's Signature
Signature ** Please read compliance statement on back of permit ** Issuing Date
Application Fee(s)
Check# Local Plan ningJurisdiction
Expiration Date
Rover File Name
❑CAMA / ❑ DREDGE & FILL
GENERAL PERMIT
Previous permit #
❑New ❑Modification L1 Complete Reissue
El Partial Reissue Date previous permit issued
As authorized by the State of North Carolina, Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant to I SA NCAC
❑ Rules attached.
Applicant Name
Project Location: County
Address
Street Address/ State Road/ Lot #(s)
City State ZIP
Phone # ( ) Fax # ( )
Subdivision
Authorized bent f
City ZIP
❑ CW ❑ EW ❑ PTA ❑ ES ❑ PTS
Phone # ( ) River Basin
Affected
AEC(s): ❑ OEA ❑ HHF ❑ IH ❑ UBA ❑ N/A
Adj. Wtr. Body (nat /man /unkn)
❑ PWS: ❑ FC:
ORW: yes / no PNA yes / no Crit.Hab.
yes / no Closest Maj. Wtr. Body
Type of Project/ Activity
Pier (dock) length
Platform(s)
Finger pier(s)
Groin length
number
Bulkhead/ Riprap length
avg distance offshore
max distance offshore
Basin, channel
cubic yards_
Boat ramp
Boathouse/ Boatlift
Beach Bulldozi
Other
Shoreline Length
SAV: not sure yes no
Sandbags: not sure yes no
Moratorium: n/a yes no
Photos: yes no
Waiver Attached: yes no
A building permit may be required by: ❑ See note on back regarding River Basin rules.
Notes/ Special Conditions
Agent or Applicant Printed Name
Permit Officer's Signature
Signature ** Please read compliance statement on back of permit ** Issuing Date
Application Fee(s)
Check# Local Plan ningJurisdiction
Expiration Date
Rover File Name

Statement of Compliance and Consistency
This permit is subject to compliance with this application, site drawing and attached general and specific conditions. Any
violation of these terms may subject the permittee to a fine or criminal or civil action; and may cause the permit to become
null and void.
This permit must be on the project site and accessible to the permit officer when the project is inspected for compliance. The
applicant certifies by signing this permit that 1) prior to undertaking any activities authorized by this permit, the applicant will
confer with appropriate local authorities to confirm that this project is consistent with the local land use plan and all local
ordinances, and 2) a written statement or certified mail return receipt has been obtained from the adjacent riparian
landowner(s) .
The State of North Carolina and the Division of Coastal Management, in issuing this permit under the best available
information and belief, certify that this project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal Management Program.
River Basin Rules Applicable To Your Project:
[ J Tar - Pamlico River Basin Buffer Rules ❑ Other:
❑ Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules
If indicated on front of permit, your project is subject to the Environmental Management Commission's Buffer Rules for the
River Basin checked above due to its location within that River Basin. These buffer rules are enforced by the NC Division of
Water Quality. Contact the Division of Water Quality at the Washington Regional Office (252-946-6481) or the Wilmington
Regional Office (910-796-7215) for more information on how to complywith these buffer rules.
Division of Coastal Management Offices
Raleigh Office Morehead City Headquarters
Mailing Address: 400 Commerce Ave
1638 Mail Service Center Morehead City, NC 28557
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638 252-808-2808/ 1-888-4RCOAST
Location: Fax: [phone]
2728 Capital Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
919-733-2293
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Carteret, Craven, Onslow -above
New River Inlet- and Pamlico Counties)
Elizabeth City District
1367 U.S. 17 South
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
252-264-3901
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Camden, Chowan, Currituck,
Dare, Gates, Pasquotank and Perquimans
Counties)
Washington District
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
252-946-6481
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Beaufort, Bertie, Hertford, Hyde,
Tyrrell and Washington Counties)
Wilmington District
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
910-796-7215
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Brunswick, New Hanover,
Onslow -below New River Inlet- and
Pender Counties)
Revised 08/09/06

Applicant:
�,� L�O► C�S7 t
Date: //--7-1)--
Describe
/--7'1Z
Describe beICIN the HABITAT disturbances for the application. Ad values should match the name, and units of measurement
found in your Habitat code sheet.
Habitat Name
DISTURB TYPE
Choose One
TOTAL Sq. Ft.
(Applied for.
Disturbance total
includes any
anticipated
restoration or
temp impacts)
FINAL Sq. Ft.
(Anticipated final
disturbance.
Excludes any
restoration
and/or temp
impact amount)
TOTAL Feet
(Applied for.
Disturbance
total includes
any anticipated
restoration or
temp impacts)
FINAL Feet
(Anticipated final
disturbance.
Excludes any
restoration and/or
temp impact
amount
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other a,
/ /
J)3
A e
Dredge ❑ Fill Both ❑ Other ❑
/-76
—
Dredge ElFill B"Both E]Other E]3
oC o
J 3� D G II
Dredge ❑ Fill [Both ❑ Other ❑
r l
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
Dredge ❑ Fill ❑ Both ❑ Other ❑
262.808-2808 ,- 1-B83-4Ri'0.A5 „,;�✓v .n-,:ra,.a,iaj r-an4.3s : -T,n,at 02P15110

❑ � ❑ Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
October 30, 2012
Mr. Stephen Lane
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Morehead City Office
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
Re: Waterstreet Bridge Replacement -Bridge No. 324
LAMA- General and Nationwide Permit #23 Application (Additional Information Request)
Belhaven, Beaufort County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Lane:
On behalf of the Town of Belhaven, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. is submitting the
additional information requested including the property owner notification form and design
drawings for the Waterstreet Bridge Replacement (Bridge No. 24). We have also included a
check ($800) for the required permit application fees.
The following information is included as part of this application submittal:
• Check for Application Fees
• Pungo District Hospital Owner Notification Form
• Grading, Paving, Drainage, and Structure Design Drawings
If there is any additional information you need to assist in the processing of this application,
please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Anna Reusche, PWS
Enclosures CIO
Copy: W. Steven Nobles, CPA -Finance Director, Town of Belhaven
Tom Steffens, USACE
Garcy Ward, NCDWQ

❑ � � Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
i2ECEIVED
October 12, 2012
Mr. Stephen Lane OCT 15 2012
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Morehead City Office
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
Re: Waterstreet Bridge Replacement -Bridge No. 324
CAMA- General and Nationwide Permit #23 Application Package ( Updated)
Belhaven, Beaufort County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Lane:
On behalf of the Town of Belhaven, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. is submitting the
enclosed Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) General Permit application (updated
10/2/2012) for impacts to Public Trust Waters (Wynn's Gut) and Tar -Pamlico riparian buffers
associated with the replacement of the Water Street Bridge (No. 324) in Belhaven, Beaufort
County, North Carolina. This project is included in the 2009-2015 NCDOT Transportation
Improvement Program as Project B-4500. A Programmatic Categorical Exclusion has been
approved for this project and signed by NCDOT (9/2/10) and FHWA (9/16/10). Field review of
the project area was conducted by the USACE (Tom Steffens), NCDWQ (Garcy Ward), and
NCDCM (Stephen Lane) on July 22, 2010. As of the date of this submittal, this project has
received written approval for the 404 Nationwide Permit Number 23, 401 Water Quality
Certification (3891) with Tar -Pamlico Buffer Authorization, and U.S. Coast Guard Advanced
Approval.
The following information is included as part of this application submittal:
• Application for Major Development Permit (DCM MP -1)
• Project Narrative
• Excavation and Fill (DCM-MP2) form
• Bridges and Culverts (DCM-MP5) form
• Location Map (Plan Sheet 1 of 5)
• Plan Sheets (Sheets 2-5)
• Agent Authorization Form
• Adjacent Riparian Property Owner Notification Forms (Signed Copies)
• Agency Approvals (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Coast Guard, N.C. Division of
Water Quality, Ecosystem Enhancement Program)
• Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (signed)
• Original Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Application

NCDOT Bridge Management Unit records indicate Bridge No. 324, constructed in 1940, has a
sufficiency rating of 22.6 out of a possible 100 for a new structure. The posted weight limit on
the bridge is down to 8 tons for single vehicles and 14 tons for truck -tractor semi -trailers. The
bridge is considered structurally deficient.
The purpose of this project is to replace the Water Street Bridge (Bridge #324) over Wynn's Gut,
a tributary of Pantego Creek. The current bulkheads under the bridge are part of the existing
structure and will also be replaced. Bridge No. 324 is constructed of timber and steel and should
be possible to remove with no resulting debris in the water based on standard demolition
practices. The bridge will be replaced on the existing alignment with traffic being detoured
offsite during the construction period.
The project site begins in front of the Pungo District Hospital and proceeds in a southeast
direction across the tributary to the intersection with Wynn's Gut Lane before ending in front of
the building for the Community Developers of Beaufort. In addition to the bridge replacement,
this project will also consist of new grading and paving for the locations immediately
surrounding the bridge to tie the new bridge to the existing roadway.
The site consists of areas along Water Street and the bridge carrying Water Street across Wynn's
Gut. The main drainageway for the area is Wynn's Gut. Wynn's Gut flows to Pantego Creek
which flows to the Pungo River which ultimately discharges into the Pamlico Sound. Land use
in the vicinity of the site is urban including the Pungo District Hospital to the west, the marina to
the east, residential and commercial development to the north, and open water to the south.
All the soils in this area are classified as urban land (Ur) with more than 85 percent of the surface
area covered with streets, buildings, parking lots, and airports. This area has been greatly altered
by cutting, filling, grading, and shaping. Slopes range from 0-6 percent.
The project is approximately 0.06 miles in length. Approximately 0.21 acres will be disturbed
during the construction of this project. Bridge No. 324 is 52 feet long. The replacement structure
will be a bridge of 51.5 feet in length. The current bulkheads under the bridge will be replaced.
The proposed bridge will include two 11 -foot lanes, curb and gutter, and 5 -foot sidewalks on
both sides. The roadway grade of the new structure will be approximately the same as the
existing structure, varying one foot or less for the existing ground. In addition, approximately
0.09 acres will be stabilized with grass and permanent plantings.
Authorization is being requested for 0.042 acre of temporary impact to Public Trust Area
(Wynn's Gut) associated with the removal of the existing 3 span bridge which is being replaced
with a single span structure and 0.016 acre of permanent impact associated with fill required for
the bulkhead replacement. In addition, the bridge replacement will impact 1,581 sq ft. of Zone 1
Tar -Pamlico riparian buffers and 609 sq ft. of Zone 2 buffer. Mitigation for buffer impacts will
be provided by the Ecosystem Enhancement Program. There are no jurisdictional wetlands
located within the project area.
G,i 1.'-2012

If there is any additional information you need to assist in the processing of this application,
please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Enclosures
Copy: W. Steven Nobles, CPA -Finance Director, Town of Belhaven
Tom Steffens, USACE
Garcy Ward, NCDWQ

DCM MP4
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
(last revised 12/27/06)
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1. Primary Applicant/ Landowner Information
Business Name
The Town Of Belhaven
Project Name (if applicable)
Water Street Bridge Replacement - Bridge No. 324
Applicant 1: First Name
Dr. Guinn
MI
Last Name
Leverett
Kimley-Horn And Associates, Inc.
Applicant 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name
If additional applicants, please attach an additional page(s) with names listed.
Mailing Address
PO Box 220
PO Box
City
Belhaven
State
NC
ZIP
27810
Country
USA
Phone No.
252 - 943 -
3055 ext.
No.
F252- 943 - 2357
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
town manager@belhavennc. us
City
State
2. Agent/Contractor Information
Business Name
Kimley-Horn And Associates, Inc.
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Beth
Reed
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
33068
Raleigh
NC
ZIP
Phone No. 1
Phone No. 2
27636
919 - 677 -
2073 ext.
- ext.
FAX No.
Contractor #
919 677 2050
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State ZIP
3001 Weston Parkway
Cary
NC 27636 -
Email
[e-mail]
<Form continues on back>

Form DCM MP -1 (Page 2 of 4) APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
3. Project Location
a.
County (can be multiple)
Street Address
State Rd. #
Beaufort
Water Street between Pungo District Hospital and the
Size of individual lot(s)
d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
Community Developers Building.
N/A, I I
NWL (normal water level)
Subdivision Name
City
11 feet NNHW or ❑NWL
State
Zip
N/A
Belhaven
f.
INC
27810 -
Phone No.
Lot No. (s) (if many, attach additional page with list)
N/A - - ext.
NW,
a. In which NC river basin is the project located?
b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
Tar -Pamlico
Wynn's Gut
c. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade?
d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
NNatural ❑Manmade ❑Unknown
Pantego Creek
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
f. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
NYes []No
work falls within.
Belhaven
4. Site Description
a.
Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.)
b. Size of entire tract (sclft)
Approximately 32 LF
Approximately 9150 square feet
c.
Size of individual lot(s)
d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
N/A, I I
NWL (normal water level)
(If many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list)
11 feet NNHW or ❑NWL
e.
Vegetation on tract
Area is urbanized and heavily developed. Little to no vegetation present around project.
f.
Man-made features and uses now on tract
Existing bridge span over Wynn's Gut
g.
Identify and describe the existing land uses adiacent to the proposed project site.
Urban land use - Pungo District Hospital to the West, a marina to the East, residential and commercial development to the
North, and open water to the South.
h.
How does local government zone the tract?
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
General business zone
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
❑Yes ❑No NNA
j.
Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? ❑Yes NNo
k.
Has a professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. ❑Yes NNo ❑NA
If yes, by whom?
I.
Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a NYes ❑No ❑NA
National Register listed or eligible property?
<Form continues on next page>

Form DCM MP -1 (Page 3 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
m. (i) Are there wetlands on the site? ❑Yes ®No
(ii) Are there coastal wetlands on the site? []Yes ®No
(iii) If yes to either (i) or (ii) above, has a delineation been conducted? ❑Yes ®No
(Attach documentation, if available)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
The area is served by Town of Belhaven Public Utilities Department.
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
Drinking water is provided by the Town of Belhaven Public Utilities Department
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems.
The marjority of storm water entering the project area runs into the Town of Belhaven stormwater system.
5. Activities and Impacts
a.
Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use? ❑Commercial ®Public/Government
❑Private/Community
b.
Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
The Water Street Bridge is being replaced over Wynn's Gut due to structural deficiencies. After completion, the bridge will
be safe and better able to accommodate the traffic demands of the area.
c.
Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
The existing bridge will be removed, the bulkheads will be replaced, and a new bridge built in its place. Equipment used will
include cranes, backhoes, trackhoes, dump trucks, and graders.
d.
List all development activities you propose.
Development activities proposed are bridge and bulkhead replacement, with surface grading to match adjacent road surface
to the new bridge surface.
?n
e.
Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? New work.
f.
What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project? .21 ❑Sq.Ft or ®Acres
g.
Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area ®Yes ❑No ❑NA
that the public has established use of?
h.
Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
No new discharges will be created due to this project.
i.
Will wastewater or stormwater be discharged into a wetland? ❑Yes ®No [--INA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water? ❑Yes [--]No ®NA
j.
Is there any mitigation proposed? ❑Yes ❑No ®NA
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal.
<Form continues on back>

Form DCM MP -1 (Page 4 of 4) APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
6. Additional Information
In addition to this completed application form, (MP -1) the following items below, if applicable, must be submitted in order for the application
package to be complete. Items (a) — (f) are always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
instruction booklet on how to properly prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
f. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name Wynne View, Inc. Phone No. [phone]
Address 293 East Water Street
Name Pungo District Hospital Phone No. [phone]
Address 202 East Water Street
Name Bryant and Claudia Baker Phone No. [phone]
Address 135 River Drive
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, if applicable.
i. Wetland delineation, if necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10), if necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
7. Certification and Permission to Enter on Land
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Date to Print Name berg f7<aE�D
Signature
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed project.
®DCM MP -2 Excavation and Fill Information ®DCM MP -5 Bridges and Culverts
❑DCM MP -3 Upland Development
❑DCM MP -4 Structures Information

Project Narrative -
1.0 Proiect Description
The purpose of this project is to replace the Water Street Bridge (Bridge #324) over a tributary of the
Pungo River in Beaufort County, Belhaven. This project will also consist of new grading, and paving for
the immediately surrounding locations to tie the new bridge to the existing roadway. The length of
structure is 0.010 miles and the length of roadway improvements is 0.045 miles, resulting in a project
length of approximately 0.055 miles. Approximately 0.212 acres will be disturbed during the
construction of this project. Also, approximately 0.0866 acres will be vegetatively stabilized with grass
and permanent plantings.
Water Street Bridge is located in Beaufort County, Belhaven, NC. The project site begins in front of the
Pungo District Hospital (35.537964 ° N, -76.622727 ° E) and proceeds in an east/southeast direction
across the tributary to the intersection with Wynn's Gut Lane before ending in front of the Community
Developers of Beaufort building (35.537434 ° N, -76.621986 ° E).
2.0 Site Description
The site is generally level. All drainage sheet flows across the site and makes its way into a tributary of
the Pantego Creek.
The site is developed containing urbanized areas with a few pockets of cultivated land. The major
drainage way for the area is Wynn's Gut. This tributary to Pantego Creek ultimately flows into the Pungo
River then empties into the Pamlico Sound.
3.0 Adiacent Property
Land use in the vicinity is generally commercial. Areas adjacent the proposed roadway consist of
residential, hospitals and commercial. The major outlet for run-off discharge is Wynn's Gut. Wynn's
Gut is a well-established, gently flowing tributary to the Pungo River.
4.0 Soils
All the soils in this area can be classified as urban land consisting of more than 85 percent of the surface
area covered with streets, buildings, parking lots, or airports. This area has been greatly altered by cutting,
filling, grading, and shaping. The soils between urban facilities are often used for parks lawns,
playgrounds, or drainage ways. Slope ranges from 0 to 6 percent.
The land capability subclass is VAIs. No woodland ordination symbol has been assigned to this area.

Form DCM MP -2
EXCAVATION and FILL
(Except for bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP -1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation and/or fill activities. All values should be given in feet.
1.
Access
❑This section not applicable
a.
Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or NWL in
b. Type of material to be excavated.
Other
Existing earthen material between proposed and existing
Channel
Canal
Boat Basin
Boat Ramp
Rock Groin
Rock
(excluding
(i) Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlands/marsh
(NLW or
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
Approximately 4.5 cubic yards (excavation associated with
Breakwater
shoreline
NWL)
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
stabilization
Length
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
NA
2.
Width
N This section not applicable
a.
Location of disposal area.
b. Dimensions of disposal area.
To be provided by contractor
NA
Avg. Existing
(i) Do you claim title to disposal area?
d. (i) Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance?
❑Yes [-]No NNA
❑Yes [:]No NNA
(ii) If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.
Depth
NA
e.
NA
NA
Final Project
❑Yes NNo ❑NA
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
(ii) If yes, how much water area is affected?
Depth
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
NA
OWL NNone
NA
NA
(ii) Describe the purpose of disposal in these areas:
1.
EXCAVATION
❑This section not applicable
a.
Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or NWL in
b. Type of material to be excavated.
cubic yards.
Existing earthen material between proposed and existing
Approximately 20 cubic yard (excavation associated with
bulkhead
bulkhead)
C.
(i) Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlands/marsh
d. High -ground excavation in cubic yards.
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
Approximately 4.5 cubic yards (excavation associated with
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
vvaerne
tlifoundations)
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
❑WL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
NA
2.
DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL
N This section not applicable
a.
Location of disposal area.
b. Dimensions of disposal area.
To be provided by contractor
NA
C.
(i) Do you claim title to disposal area?
d. (i) Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance?
❑Yes [-]No NNA
❑Yes [:]No NNA
(ii) If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.
(ii) If yes, where?
NA
e.
(i) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh
f. (i) Does the disposal include any area in the water?
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
❑Yes NNo ❑NA
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
(ii) If yes, how much water area is affected?
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
NA
OWL NNone
(ii) Describe the purpose of disposal in these areas:
NA

3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION El This section not applicable
(If development is a wood groin, use MP -4 — Structures)
a. I ype of shoreline stabilization:
®Bulkhead ❑Riprap ❑Breakwater/Sill ❑Other:
c. Average distance waterward of NHW or NWL: 4'
e. Type of stabilization material:
Bulkheads
g. Number of square feet of fill to be placed below water level.
Bulkhead backfill 718 sf Riprap
Breakwater/Sill Other
i. Source of fill material.
To be provided by contractor
b. Length: 176 L.F. (Proposed bulkheads)
Width: 2.5'
d. Maximum distance waterward of NHW or NWL: 12'
f. (i) Has there been shoreline erosion during preceding 12
months?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, state amount of erosion and source of erosion amount
information.
NA
h. Type of fill material.
Earthen material
C 2 �'!
4, OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES ®This section not applicable
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. (i) Will fill material be brought to the site? ❑Yes UNo NNA b.
If yes,
(ii) Amount of material to be placed in the water NA
(iii) Dimensions of fill area NA
(iv) Purpose of fill
NA
(i) Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands/marsh (CW),
submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or
other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the fill in these areas
NA
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion b. What type of construction equipment will be used (e.g., dragline.
controlled? backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
Silt fence, turbidity curtains, and check dams Backhoe
C. (i) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the project?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, explain what type and how they will be implemented.
NA
Ia
d. (i) Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project
site? ❑Yes ®No [INA
(ii) If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
NA
Date Applicant Name
l A,'T' E E Q� Appli nt Signature
Project Name

Form OCM MP -5
BRIDGES and CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP -1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
1. BRIDGES El This section not applicable
a. Is the proposed bridge: b. Water body to be crossed by bridge:
❑Commercial EPublic/Government ❑Private/Community Wynn's Gut
C. Type of bridge (construction material):
Substructure - P/S Pile with reinforced concrete caps
Superstructure - P/S cored concrete cored slab units with
asphalt wearing surface
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at NLW or NWL:
2.7 ft. (depth taken from bottom of channel to MLW=-0.77')
e. (i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? ®Yes [:]No f
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge: 52'
(iii) Width of existing bridge: 32'
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge: 45
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain) All of the existing bridge will be removed.
9 Length of proposed bridge: 51.5
i. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow? []Yes ®No
If yes, explain: NA
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge: 4_5
(i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert? []Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert: NA
(iii) Width of existing culvert: NA
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL: NA
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain) NA
h Width of proposed bridge: 39'
j. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by reducing or
increasing the existing navigable opening? ®Yes ❑No
If yes, explain: Existing bridge is a 3 span structure that has
one span blocked and will be replaced with a single span
structure - From 15' horiz. clearance to 32.5' horiz.
I. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard concerning their
approval? ®Yes ❑No
If yes, explain: Project has been discussed with USACE
representative, Waverly Gregory. An Advanced Approval
(AA) permit request will be submitted to the USCG for this
project.
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing no navigable n. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands: N/A
waters? ®Yes ®No
If yes, explain: NA
2. CULVERTS ®This section not applicable

a• Number of culverts proposed: NA
c. Type of culvert (construction material):
NA
b. Water body in which the culvert is to be placed:
NA
< Form continues on back>
d. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge? e. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
❑Yes ❑No [--]Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge: NA
(iii) Width of existing bridge: NA
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge: NA
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain) NA
f. Length of proposed culvert: NA
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the NHW or NWL.
NA
j. Will the proposed culvert affect navigation by reducing or
increasing the existing navigable opening? ❑Yes [--]No
If yes, explain: NA
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert(s): NA
(iii) Width of existing culvert(s): NA
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL: NA
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain) NA
9. Width of proposed culvert: NA
i. Depth of culvert to be buried below existing bottom contour.
NA
k. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
❑Yes ❑No
If yes, explain: NA
3. EXCAVATION and FILL [I This section not applicable
a. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation below the NHW or NWL? ❑Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated: NA
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated: NA
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated: NA
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards: NA
b. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV OSB
❑WL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
NA

C. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
high -ground excavation? ®Yes [--]No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated: 56'
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated: 30'
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated: 2'
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards: 125 cy
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any excavation, please complete the following:
(i) Location of the spoil disposal area: N/A. (to be provided by the contractor)
e.
9•
(ii) Dimensions of the spoil disposal area: N/A
(iii) Do you claim title to the disposal area? ❑Yes ❑No (If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.)
(iv) Will the disposal area be available for future maintenance? ❑Yes ❑No
(v) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAVs), other wetlands (WL), or shell
bottom (SB)?
❑CW ❑SAV OWL ❑SB ®None
If any boxes are checked, give dimensions if different from (ii) above. NA
(vi) Does the disposal area include any area below the NHW or NWL? ? ❑Yes ❑No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (ii) above. NA
(i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed below NHW or NWL? ❑Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled: NA
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled: NA
(iv) Purpose of fill: NA
(i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed on high -ground? ®Yes []No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled: 610 sq.ft.
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled: NA
(iv) Purpose of fill: Raise the roadway grade.
4. GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project require the relocation of any existing
utility lines? ®Yes ❑No
If yes, explain: Existing waterline on the bridge will be
moved to separate support (aerial) & relocation of
existing power above ground power line
(i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV OSB
❑WL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
NA
b. Will the proposed project require the construction of any temporary
detour structures? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain: NA

If this portion of the proposed project has already received
approval from local authorities, please attach a copy of the
approval or certification.
< Form continues on back>
C. Will the proposed project require any work channels? d. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion
❑Yes ®No controlled?
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2. Silt fence, turbidity curtains, and check dams
e. What type of construction equipment will be used (for example,
dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
Backhoe
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
shoreline stabilization? ®Yes ❑No
If yes, complete form MP -2, Section 3 for Shoreline
Stabilization only.
Date
l� l� a -
Project Name
-fOL'm or &J'W-�
Ap t Name
"+�6a R
A4p scant Signature
f. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project site?
❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
NA

BYP
284
BUSS � iPPn
U'
pO2 U0
99 os
pP
tis
�FFr
c0
t
Gp
QPM
0�
9rF PUMM RIVER
R
sA
TFC
PROJECT
LOCATION
R'M�7' RM1ER
PROJECT LOCATM YAP
❑ Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
OC ,2011
Pool ONIc. B . 33068
Raleigh, Noah Carolina 27636
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 50 /00
(IN FEET)
/INCH = /00 FT
10
IMPACT 1
FIGURES 3-5
10
TOWN OF BELHAVEN PROJECT CORRIDOR SHEET
WATER STREET
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT I OF 5
JUNE 6, 2011

� Kimley-Horn TOWN OF BELHAVEN
m and Associates, Inc. WATER STREET
@''°"BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
Po�� Ohio Boa 79068
Raleivh, Nonh C-11- 27636
?MANENT
W WATERI
:IMPACTS
RIPARIAN
BUFFER
IMPACTS
BZ 1:
1581 SF
(0.036 AC)
718 SF
PERPENDICULAR
BZ 2:
1.016 AC)
609 SF
(0.014 AC)
PERPENDICULAR
BZ 1:
1581 SF
(0.036 AC)
718 SF
PERPENDICULAR
BZ 2:
1.016 AQ
609 SF
(0.014 AC)
PERPENDICULAR
IMPACT SUMMARY SHEET
2 OF 5
JUNE 69 2011

GRAPHIC SCALE
25 0 25 50
77&
(IN FEET) i
/INCH = 50 FT N 7F, EXISTING
BULKHEAD
BRYANT 8 CLAD0IA BAKER
PC 168
E PG 8
DB Bio PC 16B UR
C 2
URTAIN rTAN N
PROPOSED
BULXIEAO e
PROPOSED TE'
BRYANT 6 CLAUDIA BAKER WATERLINE
DB 655 PC 636FOUNDATION EX15TIEA 4
PC E PG 85 BULKNEAD PROPOSED
MATERLNE
BRDOED�
_L_
WATER ST
EXISTING
NOHT-OF-NAY
Xr—E E _
I/.
1A
BUFFER ZONE IIMPACTS
- 1,581 S.F. (0.036 A.C.)
BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS
- 609 S.F. (0,014 A.C.)
WATNE VIEW INC.
t z PROPOSED
BULKHEAD
00 1000 PC 379
F
—'a
O
EXISTING
LEIGH EDWARD
ryP��
T
PAiT FRON661
08 TT 0G
4
n
BULKHEAD
__Y I
D° 645 PC 528
DDB I0 ;6 PL 88,
1
WATER ST
RALPH W.HOI
00 833 PC
08 607 PC
:ZMFIKimley-Horn TOWN OF BELHAVEN
and Associates, Inc. WATER STREET BUFFER
IMPACT I SHEET
Pu,N,A.h...Ii..2 BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 3 OF 5
0.alaiph, Nonh Corolino 77616 JUNE 6 , 2 011
t z PROPOSED
BULKHEAD
PROPOSED
BULKHEAD
—'a
EXISTING
TURBIDITY
CURTAIN
- ,vA
PUNCO DISTRICT HOSPITAL
BULKHEAD
__Y I
D° 645 PC 528
DDB I0 ;6 PL 88,
ExKTING
TOWN OE BELHAVEN
OB 1020 Pc 437
BULKHEAD
DIXON & HOYLE PARTNERSHIP
(-_ )
DS 1569 PC 648
I V
EXISTING FILL SLOPE LIMITS
—' —"
TURBIDITY CURTAIN
—E—
EASEMENT
BUFFER ZONE
—BZ1—
IIMPACTS
BUFFER ZONE I-827—
— — —
PROPOSED SLOPE IMPACT LIMITS
--
BUFFER ZONE 2
—PDE—
PERMANENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT
BUFFER ZONE
—"—"—
2 IMPACTS
PARTNERSHIP
TOP OF BANKS fi48
PROPOSED SILT FENCE
RALPH W.HOI
00 833 PC
08 607 PC
:ZMFIKimley-Horn TOWN OF BELHAVEN
and Associates, Inc. WATER STREET BUFFER
IMPACT I SHEET
Pu,N,A.h...Ii..2 BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 3 OF 5
0.alaiph, Nonh Corolino 77616 JUNE 6 , 2 011

GRAPHIC SCALE
25 0 25
(IN FEET)
l INCH = 50 FT
BRYANT & CLAUDIA BAKER
06 655 PC 636
PC E PC 115
-L-
WATER ST
EXISTING
RIGHT -OF-
J
-i
�I
inn
' PUNCO DISTRICT h0SPIT,
F�_j 08 645 PC 628
DB KI 6 PC. BB<
r"D
— - — ' - EXISTING FILL SLOPE LIMITS
— E — EASEMENT TEMPORARY OPEN
— PROPOSED SLOPE IMPACT LIMITS =_ WATER/AEC IMPACTS
—PDE— PERMANENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT PERMANENT OPEN
WATER/AEC IMPACTS
-k
13-15,
TEMPORARY OPEN WATER/AEC IMPACTS
1814 S.F. (0.042 A.C.)
DB 1569 PC 648
TURBIDITY CURTAIN
—62'— BUFFER ZONE I
"— BUFFER ZONE 2
"—"— TOP OF BANKS PARTNERSHIP
PROPOSED SILT FENCE
EM❑Kimley-Horn TOWN OF BELHAVEN
and Associates, Inc. WATER STREET OPEN WATER
'X07 Pe,I�c,5o 33068 BRIDGE REPLACEMENT IMPACT I SHEET OF 5
W,igh, N,dh C—lim 27636 JUNE 6, 2011
,mad

GRAPHIC SCALE
125 0 125 25
(IN FEET)
l INCH = 50 FT
N
N N
m m
P1= 11+50.00 —L— STA I2+29.00
EL = 552' ELE 759'
VC = 50'
K=69
P POSED
GR E
+ .69%
ca
1
EXISTING
BULKHEAD
I
NORMAL W.S.EL. = -0.11'
a EXISTING BRIDGE
(MARCH 10, 2010)
END BRIDGE
—L—
STA I2-
ELEV 7.63'
P1=
12+50.00
EL
= 8.41'
VC
= 100'
K
= 19
—PROPOSED —�
END BENTS
— PROPOSED
__,8ULKHE1�
♦ _
��❑Kimley-Horn TOWN OF BELHAVEN
and Associates, Inc, WATER STREET
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
Pori OXic. Bo. 7JO6B
0.oleiph, Nonh C-., 27636 -
N N
N
TIE E UALI
-L STA 13 03.47 =
2- STA 1 1
+19.65
E EV=7.2 '
� X224%
N
EXISTING
BULKHEAD
MHW = 0.43'
\_—MTL = -0.17'
MLW = -0.77'
PROFILE SHEET
IMPACT 1 5 OF 5
JUNE 6, 2011

Agent Authorization Form

38r0abrn
lHapor
Qbam IV. O'ReaI
TaWn manager
39r. Oninn I£.eberett
Tobju Clerk
Olarie T. Rbanvc CAcf
�5fditltSlJ J$c��
Letter of Authorization
Town (found)
Arkee (Olac) Pigott, fir., Slapor Vro-19em
,&tebc, B. Caraboan
1• �el�oiT yup
otuarb .4loore
Robert 1. gtanlep
Dr. Quinn Leverett (Town Manager), with the Town of Belhaven authorizes
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to act as our limited agent to coordinate with
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Quality
and Division of Coastal Management for the preparation and submittal of
jurisdictional determinations and 404/401 and CAMA permits applications
associated with the replacement of Bridge No. 324 (Water Street bridge) located
in Beaufort County, North Carolina. Authorization will terminate on either final
agency action or upon written notification from either parties involved.
Company Name: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Contact Name: Beth Reed
Client Address: Town of Belhaven
P.O. Box 220
Belhaven, NC 27810
Client Phone #: [phone]
Client Fax #: (Z 5 )2 q — 2735-7
Client Email: townmanagei-60elhavennc.us
(Signature of C 'ent)
'6�- - -
�(
Date
digit Our VrUite
tttl://ttl` iu.belbabEnnr.u!�
,Vn5t (Office JBQx 220, �Relljabett, J�ortlj Gralifta 27SIO • [phone] • -fax [phone]

Adjacent Property Riparian Property
Owner Notification Form
R � -D
CCT 15 2012

DIVISION OF COASTAL
MAIL - RETURN
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to �'L^ � �w� �JQ-4`^�v e w 's
(Name f Property Owner)
property located at u3 --V-,F 5� �
(Address, Lot, Block, Road, etc.)
t
on s C-7�s� , in �_�L.nu��. `�1�� �� N.C.
(Waterbody) (City/Town and/or County)
Agent's Name #: Ly4A Mailing Address:? ti - ox 33 O (P
Agent's phone (' -4--- -.1-0-+3 V6 A)LI , �)L aft, _S So
He/She has described to me as shown below the development helshe is proposing at that location,
and I have no objections to the proposal.
DESCRIPTION AND/OR DRAWING OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
(Individual proposing development must fill in description below or attach a site drawing).
RECEIVED
0 C T 31 2012
DCM-MHD CITY"
Nyou have objections to what is being proposed you must notify the Division of CoastalManagement
(DCM) in wrWngr within 10 days of receipt of this notice. Contact Information for DCM offices Is
avell$ble at www.nccoastalmongementneycontact dcm.hfm or by calling 1-888-4RCOAST. No
response is considered the same as no obiection ff you have been notified by Certffled Mail.
(Property O er!n ation) (Riparian Property O or Information)
S' nature Signature
L�. -CSW.n '\�Owu\aa...
Print or Type Name 0
Mailing Address
Ciby tate&lp
t a-aj 4y3 -
Telephone Number
/or
Date
Print oto ype Namo
Marling Address
, lJ L
Cot tatelzo
Lase-) D -m
Telephone Numbar
/n�/3o1%/L
Date

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION FORM
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
I hereby certify that 1 own property adjacent to ., d ��c. 's
ame of Property Owner)
property located at 16 E Nmaief-!��
(Address, Lot, Block, Road, etc.)
on ls�y�v.`5 C ��- in N.C.
(Waterbody) (City/Town and/or County)
Agent's Name #: Mailing Address: � D DX -:Y3 D b
Agent's phone #:
T—r
He/She has described to me as shown below the development he/she is proposing at that location,
and 1 have no objections to the proposal.
DESCRIPTION AND/0R DRAWING OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
(Individual proposing development must till in description below or attach a site drawing)
If you have objections to what is being proposed, you must notify the Division of Coastal Management
(DCM) In writing within 90 days of receipt of this notice. Contact information for DCM offices is
available at www.nccoastalmangementnet/contact dcm.him or by calling 4-888-4RCOAST. No
response is considered the same as no objection if you have been notified by Certifiled Mail.
(Prope er In ation)
ignature61
1 nV� Pv 2t ert r a a,n L. �nlr
Print or Type Name
Mailing Address
COIStatelZip
Casa-) cig-3
Telephone IVU ber
Date
(Riparian Property Owner Information)
Signa re
Pnn r Type Mame
lac- "\l u J e -i -q -
Marling Address
�J C-
City/StateiZip
C vQLA-3 c�t�
Telephone Number
Date

Xaa
op 141210:27a MURPHY MOORE 7574814227 p,1
2
a DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT S. Jl'o$Lgs (3 2 52- °f y3.2357
3� ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION FORM
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to j � �^''^ a� ��� �ti` 's
(Name of Property Owner)
property located at 4-
(Address, Lot, Block, Road, etc_)
on l.v ,� n 5 t �> , in .1 �. e0.,'r C� ��s N.C.
(Waterbody) (CitylTown and/or County)
Agent's Name #: �- � -� Mailing Address:' C) -
Agent's
Agent's phone #: (9t`t� Cc ao �-3 �a�2 c L of to 3
He/She has described tome as shown below the development helshe is proposing at that location,
and I have no objections to the proposal -
DESCRIPTION AND/OR DRAWING OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
(Individual proposing development must f l in description below or attach a site drawing)
!f you have objections to what is being proposed, you must notify the Division of Coastal Management
(DCM) in writing within 10 days of receipt of this notice. Contact information for DCM offices is
available at www_nccoastalmangement.net/contact dcm.htm or by calling 1-838-4RCOAST. No
response is considered the same as no objection if you have been notified by Certified Mail.
(Prope ner Inf ation)
Signature
(:26«n LeVe,'r_ A 5,.�V\ Mir«
Print or Type Name
V- D- (�, aao
Mailing Address
City/State/Zlp
C as )-)
Telephone umbe
Date
(Riparian Property Owner Information)
Signature
Print or yp Name
O t a, -&, Vt \'S, o sn Fary
Marling Address cJ
15C \J
City ateJZlp
-157 4- i� u I - 14 a aq
Teiephone Number
_ 9
Date

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION FORM
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
hereby certify that i own property adjacent to ".
(N a of Property Owner).
property located at �- t^Da�r
(Address, Lot, Block, Road, etc.)
an ���v\5 C-�a in IuA�sa.re,�- z �)es '�� o•a^��t . N.C.
(Waterbody) (City/Town and/or County)
Agent's Name #:a Qm` 9
Mailing Address: P 'R),DX -Y30V bo
Agent's phone #: C�i�� �� 4--�Q-+3 "tet Qi. x)04 i\ {-cUi;,,4 d-=1763S-
He/She has described to me as shown belowthe development a/she is proposing atthat location,
and I have no objections to the proposal.
DESCRIPTION AND/OR DRAWING OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
(individual proposing development must fill in description below or attach a site drawing)
If you have objections to what is being proposed, you must notify the Division of Coastal Management
(DCM) in writing within 10 days of receipt of this notice. Contact information for DCM offices /s
available at www.nccoasfaimangement.net/contact dcm.htm or by calling 1-8884RCOAST. No
response is considered the same as no objection it jou have been notified by Certified Mail.
(Props nyerr In ation)
'Signature
c,av'i rNY-N U,✓PiY' L4 � ilta,n a
Print or Type Name
Mailing Address
CitylStat p
Telephone N tuber
Date
(Riparian Property Owner InfornWion)
Signature /
Piintlor Type Nah7e
Mailing Address
,P)sA1n�. PJ -,
CitylStateMp
m2l- q43 - 3)l.
Telephone Number
Date —

Agency Approvals

mx 0
moi®
BMJ
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P. E. Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
September 18, 2012
Beaufort County
DWQ Project No. 20110655
Bridge 324 over Wynns' Gut
TIP B-4500
APPROVAL of 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION, and TAR-PAMLICO BUFFER AUTHORIZATION with
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Dr. Guinn Leverett, Town Manager
Town of Belhaven
P.O. Box 220
Belhaven, NC 27810
Dear Dr. Leverett:
You have our approval, in accordance with the conditions listed below, for the following impacts for the purpose of replacing Bridge
Number 324 over Wynn's Gut in the Town of Belhaven in Beaufort County:
Buffer Impacts in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin
The project shall be constructed in accordance with your application dated received July 11, 2011 and additional information dated
received August 24, 2011 and September 4, 2012. After reviewing your application, we have decided that these impacts are covered
by General Water Quality Certification 3891. This certification corresponds to the Nationwide Permit 23 issued by the Corps of
Engineers. This approval is also valid for the Tar -Pamlico Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0259). In addition, you should
acquire any other federal, state or local permits before you proceed with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and
Erosion Control, Non -Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire with the accompanying 404
permit.
This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design described in your application (unless modified below). Should your project
change, you must notify the DWQ and submit a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this
Certification and approval letter, and is thereby responsible for complying with all the conditions. If total wetland fills for this project
(now or in the future) exceed one acre, or of total impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory
mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to remain valid, you must adhere to
the conditions listed in the attached certification.
1. The issuance of this certification does not exempt the Permittee from complying with any and all statutes, rules, regulations, or
ordinances that may be imposed by other government agencies (i.e. local, state, and federal) having jurisdiction, including but not
limited to applicable buffer rules, stormwater management rules, soil erosion and sedimentation control requirements, etc.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Internet www.ncwaterquality.orQ
943 Washington Square Mall Phone: [phone] One
Washington, NC 27889 FAX [phone] NorthCarohna
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper Naturally
Buffer Zonel
Buffer Zone2
Open Water
Site Number
Fill (sq ft
Fill (sq ft
ac
Bridge 324
1,581
609
0.16
Total
2,190
The project shall be constructed in accordance with your application dated received July 11, 2011 and additional information dated
received August 24, 2011 and September 4, 2012. After reviewing your application, we have decided that these impacts are covered
by General Water Quality Certification 3891. This certification corresponds to the Nationwide Permit 23 issued by the Corps of
Engineers. This approval is also valid for the Tar -Pamlico Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0259). In addition, you should
acquire any other federal, state or local permits before you proceed with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and
Erosion Control, Non -Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire with the accompanying 404
permit.
This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design described in your application (unless modified below). Should your project
change, you must notify the DWQ and submit a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this
Certification and approval letter, and is thereby responsible for complying with all the conditions. If total wetland fills for this project
(now or in the future) exceed one acre, or of total impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory
mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to remain valid, you must adhere to
the conditions listed in the attached certification.
1. The issuance of this certification does not exempt the Permittee from complying with any and all statutes, rules, regulations, or
ordinances that may be imposed by other government agencies (i.e. local, state, and federal) having jurisdiction, including but not
limited to applicable buffer rules, stormwater management rules, soil erosion and sedimentation control requirements, etc.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Internet www.ncwaterquality.orQ
943 Washington Square Mall Phone: [phone] One
Washington, NC 27889 FAX [phone] NorthCarohna
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper Naturally

Page 2 of 5
2. The permittee and its authorized agents shall conduct its activities in a manner consistent with State water quality standards
(including any requirements resulting from compliance with §303(d) of the Clean Water Act) and any other appropriate
requirements of State and Federal law. If DWQ determines that such standards or laws are not being met (including the failure to
sustain a designated or achieved use) or that State or federal law is being violated, or that further conditions are necessary to
assure compliance, DWQ may reevaluate and modify this certification.
3. Compensatory mitigation for impacts to 252 square feet of protected riparian buffers in Zone 1 shall be required at a ratio of 3:1.
We understand that you have chosen to perform compensatory mitigation for impacts to protected buffers through use of the
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP). Mitigation for unavoidable impacts to Tar -Pamlico Riparian Buffers
shall be provided in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin and done in accordance with 15A NCAC 213.0259. EEP has indicated in a letter
dated September 4, 2012 that they will assume responsibility for satisfying the compensatory mitigation requirements for the
above -referenced project, in accordance with the Tri -Party MOA signed on July 22, 2003 and the Dual -Party MOA signed on
April 12, 2004.
4. The Permittee shall report any violations of this certification to the Division of Water Quality within 24 hours of discovery.
5. The Permittee shall ensure that the final design drawings adhere to the certification and to the drawings submitted for approval.
6. If concrete is used during construction, a dry work area shall be maintained to prevent direct contact between curing concrete and
stream water. Water that inadvertently contacts uncured concrete shall not be discharged to surface waters due to the potential for
elevated pH and possible aquatic life and fish kills.
7. The use of rip -rap above the Normal High Water Mark shall be minimized. Any rip -rap placed for stream stabilization shall be
placed in stream channels in such a manner that it does not impede aquatic life passage.
8. During the construction of the project, no staging of equipment of any kind is permitted in waters of the U.S., or protected
riparian buffers.
9. The dimension, pattern and profile of the stream above and below the crossing shall not be modified. Disturbed floodplains and
streams shall be restored to natural geomorphic conditions.
10. Heavy equipment shall be operated from the banks rather than in the stream channel in order to minimize sedimentation and
reduce the introduction of other pollutants into the stream.
11. All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters must be regularly inspected and maintained to prevent contamination of
stream waters from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
12. No rock, sand or other materials shall be dredged from the stream channel except where authorized by this certification.
13. Discharging hydroseed mixtures and washing out hydroseeders and other equipment in or adjacent to surface waters is prohibited.
14. All fill slopes located in jurisdictional wetlands shall be placed at slopes no flatter than 3:1, unless otherwise authorized by this
certification.
15. The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary located within the construction corridor approved by this certification shall be
clearly marked by highly visible fencing prior to any land disturbing activities. Impacts to areas within the fencing are prohibited
unless otherwise authorized by this certification.
16. Native riparian vegetation (ex. list trees and shrubs native to your geographic region) must be reestablished within the
construction limits of the project by the end of the growing season following completion of construction.
17. There shall be no excavation from, or waste disposal into, jurisdictional wetlands or waters associated with this certification
without appropriate modification. Should waste or borrow sites, or access roads to waste or borrow sites, be located in wetlands
or streams, compensatory mitigation will be required since that is a direct impact from road construction activities.

Page 3 of 5
18. Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing the proper design, installation
and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed, operated, and maintained in
accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design
Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control measures must be such that they
equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion
Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects,
including contractor -owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed, operated, and maintained in
accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in accordance with the requirements of
the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
19. Strict adherence to the most recent version of NCDOT's Best Management Practices For Bridge Demolition and Removal
approved by the US Army Corps of Engineers is a condition of the 401 Water Quality Certification.
20. All pile driving or drilling activities shall be enclosed in turbidity curtains unless otherwise approved by NCDWQ in this
certification
21. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream. Stormwater shall be directed across the bridge and pre-treated
through site -appropriate means (grassed swales, pre -formed scour holes, vegetated buffers, etc.) before entering the stream.
Please refer to the most current version of Stormwater Best Management Practices.
22. Riprap shall not be placed in the active thalweg channel or placed in the streambed in a manner that precludes aquatic life
passage. Bioengineering boulders or structures should be properly designed, sized and installed.
23. All stormwater runoff shall be directed as sheetflow through stream buffers at nonerosive velocities, unless otherwise approved
by this certification.
24. Pursuant to NCACISA 2B .0259(6), sediment and erosion control devices shall not be placed in Zone 1 of any Tar -Pamlico
Buffer without prior approval by the NCDWQ. At this time, the NCDWQ has approved no sediment and erosion control devices
in Zone 1, outside of the approved project impacts, anywhere on this project. Moreover, sediment and erosion control devices
.shall be allowed in Zone 2 of the buffers provided that Zone 1 is not compromised and that discharge is released as diffuse flow.
25. All riparian buffers impacted by the placement of temporary fill or clearing activities shall be restored to the preconstruction
contours and revegetated. Maintained buffers shall be permanently revegetated with non -woody species by the end of the growing
season following completion of construction. For the purpose of this condition, maintained buffer areas are defined as areas
within the transportation corridor that will be subject to regular DOT maintenance activities including mowing. The area with
non -maintained buffers shall be permanently revegetated, with native woody species before the next growing season following
completion of construction.
26. Upon completion of the project (including any impacts at associated borrow or waste site), the NCDOT Division Engineer or
authorized agent shall complete and return the enclosed "Certification of Completion Form" to notify DWQ when all work
included in the 401 Certification has been completed.
27. A copy of this Water Quality Certification shall be maintained on site at the construction site at all times. In addition, the Water
Quality Certification and all subsequent modifications, if any, shall be maintained with the Division Engineer and the on-site
project manager.

Page 4 of 5
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days
of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition that conforms to Chapter 150B of the North
Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699. This certification
and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing. This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality
under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please contact Garcy Ward at [phone].
Sincerely,"„
for Chuck Wakild, P.E.
Attachments (General Certification and Certificate of Completion form)
cc: Tom Steffens, US Army Corps of Engineers, Washington Field Office
Sonia Carrillo, DWQ, 401/Wetlands Unit, Raleigh NC
Stephen Lane, DCM, Morehead City
Anna Reusche, Kimley-Horn and Associates, 3001 Weston Parkway, Cary, NC 27513
File Copy

DWQ Project No.:
Applicant: _
Project Name:
Date of Issuance of 401 Water Quality Certification:
County:
Page 5 of 5
Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent
modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the 401 Transportation Permitting Unit, North Carolina Division of
Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650. This form may be returned to DWQ by the applicant, the
applicant's authorized agent, or the project engineer. It is not necessary to send certificates from all of these.
Applicant's Certification
I, hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the
observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401
Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature: Date:
Agent's Certification
I, 'hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the
observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401
Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature: Date:
Engineer's Certification
Partial Final
I, , as a duly registered Professional Engineer in the State of North Carolina, having
been authorized to observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction of the project,for the Permittee hereby state that, to the
best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to
be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and
specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature
Date
Registration No.

Water Quality Certification No. 3891
GENERAL CERTIFICATION FOR PROJECTS ELIGIBLE FOR U.S. ARMY CORPS OF
ENGINEERS NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBER 23 (APPROVED CATEGORICAL
EXCLUSIONS) AND RIPARIAN AREA PROTECTION RULES (BUFFER RULES)
Water Quality Certification Number 3891 is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section
401, Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality Regulations in 15A NCAC 02H .0500 and 15A NCAC 026 .0200 for the
discharge of fill material to waters and wetland areas as described in 33 CFR 330 Appendix A (B)
(23) and for the Riparian Area Protection Rules (Buffer Rules) in 15A NCAC 02B.0200.
The category of activities shall include only Federally -approved Categorical Exclusion projects.
The State of North Carolina certifies that the specified category of activity will not violate
applicable portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217
if conducted in accordance with the conditions hereinafter set forth.
Activities meeting any one (1) of the following thresholds or circumstances require written
approval for a 401 Water Quality Certification from the Division of Water Quality (the
"Division' ):
a) Stream impacts (temporary or permanent) equal or greater than 40 linear feet; or
b) Any stream relocation; or
c) Impacts equal to or greater than one-tenth (1/10) acre of wetlands or open waters; or
d) Any impacts to wetlands adjacent to waters designated as: ORW, SA, WS -I, WS -11, or
Trout, or wetlands contiguous to waters designated as a North Carolina or National Wild
and Scenic River.
e) Any impacts to coastal wetlands [15A NCAC 7H .0205)], or Unique Wetlands (UWL) [15A
NCAC 2H.0506].
f) Any impact associated with a Notice of Violation or an enforcement action for violation(s)
of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 02H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 02H
.1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC
02B .0200); or
g) Any impacts to streams and/or buffers in the Neuse, Tar -Pamlico, or Catawba River
Basins or in the Randleman, Jordan or Goose Creek Watersheds (or any other basin or
watershed with Riparian Area Protection Rules [Buffer Rules] in effect at the time of
application) unless the activities are listed as "EXEMPT" from these rules or a Buffer
Authorization Certificate is issued through N.C. Division of Coastal Management (DCM)
delegation for "ALLOWABLE" activities.
In accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.3D(e), written approval for a 401
Water Quality General Certification must include the appropriate fee. If a project also requires a
CAMA Permit, then one payment to both agencies shall be submitted and will be the higher of the
two fees.
Activities included in this General Certification that do not meet one of the thresholds
listed above do not require written approval from the Division as long as they comply with
the Conditions of Certification listed below. If any of these Conditions cannot be met, then
written approval from the Division is required.
Conditions of Certification:
1. No Impacts Beyond those Authorized in the Written Approval or Beyond the Threshold of Use
of this Certification
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas
beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre -Construction Notification, as
Water Quality Certification No. 3891

Water Quality Certification No. 3891
authorized in the written approval from the Division or beyond the thresholds established for
use of this Certification without written authorization, including incidental impacts. All
construction activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of
sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices shall be performed so that no
violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur. Approved plans and
specifications for this project are incorporated by reference and are enforceable parts of this
permit.
2. Standard Erosion and Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices and if applicable, comply with the specific conditions and
requirements of the NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit issued to the site:
a. Design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal or exceed the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects,
including contractor -owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
b. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed,
installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the
North Carolina Surface Mining Manual.
c. Reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in
accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act and the
Mining Act of 1971.
d. Sufficient materials required for stabilization and/or repair of erosion control measures
and stormwater routing and treatment shall be on site at all times.
e. If the project occurs in waters or watersheds classified as Primary Nursery Areas (PNAs),
SA, WS -I, WS -II, High Quality (HQW), or Outstanding Resource (ORW) waters, then the
sedimentation and erosion control designs must comply with the requirements set forth
in 15A NCAC 04B.0124, Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds.
3. No Sediment and Erosion Control Measures in Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters.
Exceptions to this condition require application submittal to and written approval by the
Division. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is
unavoidable, then design and placement of temporary erosion control measures shall not be
conducted in a manner that may result in dis-equilibrium of wetlands, stream beds, or banks,
adjacent to or upstream and downstream of the above structures. All sediment and erosion
control devices shall be removed and the natural grade restored within two (2) months of the
date that the Division of Land Resources (DLR) or locally delegated program has released
the specific area within the project.
4. Construction Stormwater Permit NCG010000
Water Quality Certification No. 3891

Water Quality Certification No. 3891
An NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit is required for construction projects that disturb
one (1) or more acres of land. This Permit allows stormwater to be discharged during land
disturbing construction activities as stipulated in the conditions of the permit. If your project
is covered by this permit, full compliance with permit conditions including the erosion &
sedimentation control plan, inspections and maintenance, self-monitoring, record keeping
and reporting requirements is required. A copy of the general permit (NCG010000),
inspection log sheets, and other information may be found at
http://Portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/Ws/su/npdessw#tab-w.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) shall be required to be in full
compliance with the conditions related to construction activities within the most recent version
of their individual NPDES (NCS000250) stormwater permit.
5. Construction Moratoriums and Coordination
If activities must occur during periods of high biological activity (i.e. sea turtle nesting, fish
spawning, or bird nesting), then biological monitoring may be required at the request of other
state or federal agencies and coordinated with these activities.
All moratoriums on construction activities established by the NC Wildlife Resources
Commission (WRC), US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), NC Division of Marine Fisheries
(DMF), or National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to lessen impacts on trout, anadromous
fish, larval/post-larval fishes and crustaceans, or other aquatic species of concern shall be
implemented. Exceptions to this condition require written approval by the resource agency
responsible for the given moratorium.
Work within the twenty-five (25) designated trout counties or identified state or federal
endangered or threatened species habitat shall be coordinated with the appropriate WRC,
USFWS, NMFS, and/or DMF personnel.
6. Work in the Dry
All work in or adjacent to stream waters shall be conducted so that the flowing stream does
not come in contact with the disturbed area. Approved best management practices from the
most current version of the NC Sediment and Erosion Control Manual, or the NC DOT
Construction and Maintenance Activities Manual, such as sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams,
and other diversion structures shall be used to minimize excavation in flowing water.
Exceptions to this condition require application submittal to and written approval by the
Division.
7. Riparian Area Protection (Buffer) Rules
Activities located in the protected riparian areas (whether jurisdictional wetlands or not),
within the Neuse, Tar -Pamlico, or Catawba River Basins or in the Randleman, Jordan, or
Goose Creek Watersheds (or any other basin or watershed with buffer rules) shall be limited
to "uses" identified within and constructed in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0233-0259,
.0243, .0250, .0267 and .0605, and shall be located, designed, constructed, and maintained
to have minimal disturbance to protect water quality to the maximum extent practicable
through the use of best management practices. All buffer rule requirements, including diffuse
flow requirements, must be met.
8. If concrete is used during the construction, then all necessary measures shall be taken to
prevent direct contact between uncured or curing concrete and waters of the state. Water
that inadvertently contacts uncured concrete shall not be discharged to waters of the state
due to the potential for elevated pH and possible aquatic life/ fish kills.
Water Quality Certification No. 3891

Water Quality Certification No. 3891
9. Bridge deck drains shall not discharge directly into the stream. Stormwater shall be directed
across the bridge and pre-treated through site -appropriate means (grassed swales, pre-
formed scour holes, vegetated buffers, etc.) before entering the stream. Please refer to the
most current version of Stormwater Best Management Practices. Exceptions to this condition
requires written approval by the Division.
10. Relocated stream designs should include the same dimensions, patterns, and profiles as the
existing channel (or a stable reference reach if the existing channel is unstable), to the
maximum extent practical. The new channel should be constructed in the dry and water shall
not be turned into the new channel until the banks are stabilized. Vegetation used for bank
stabilization shall be limited to native woody species, and should include establishment of a
30 -foot wide wooded and an adjacent 20 -foot wide vegetated buffer on both sides of the
relocated channel to the maximum extent practical_ A transitional phase incorporating
appropriate erosion control matting materials and seedling establishment is allowable,
however matting that incorporates plastic mesh and/or plastic twine shall not be used in
wetlands, riparian buffers or floodplains as recommended by the North Carolina Sediment
and Erosion Control Manual. Rip -rap, A -Jacks, concrete, gabions or other hard structures
may be allowed if it is necessary to maintain the physical integrity of the stream; however, the
applicant must provide written justification and any calculations used to determine the extent
of rip -rap coverage. Please note that if the stream relocation is conducted as a stream
restoration as defined in the US Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District, April 2003
Stream Mitigation Guidelines (or its subsequent updates), the restored length may be used
as compensatory mitigation for the impacts resulting from the relocation.
11. Placement of Culverts and Other Structures in Waters and Wetlands
Culverts required for this project shall be designed and installed in such a manner that the
original stream profiles are not altered and allow for aquatic life movement during low flows.
Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section dimensions, pattern, and longitudinal
profile) must be maintained above and below locations of each culvert.
Placement of culverts and other structures in waters and streams must be below the
elevation of the streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches,
and 20 percent of the culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less than or equal to 48
inches, to allow low flow passage of water and aquatic life.
When topographic constraints indicate culvert slopes of greater than 5%, culvert burial is not
required, provided that all alternative options for flattening the slope have been investigated
and aquatic life movement/ connectivity has been provided when possible (rock ladders,
crossvanes, etc). Notification to the Division including supporting documentation to include a
location map of the culvert, culvert profile drawings, and slope calculations shall be provided
to the Division 60 days prior to the installation of the culvert.
When bedrock is present in culvert locations, culvert burial is not required provided that there
is sufficient documentation of the presence of bedrock. Notification to the Division including
supporting documentation such as, but not limited to, a location map of the culvert,
geotechnical reports, photographs, etc shall be provided to the Division a minimum of 60
days prior to the installation of the culvert. If bedrock is discovered during construction, then
the Division shall be notified by phone or email within 24 hours of discovery.
If other site-specific topographic constraints preclude the ability to bury the culverts as
described above and/or it can be demonstrated that burying the culvert would result in
destabilization of the channel, then exceptions to this condition require application submittal
to, and written approval by, the Division of Water Quality, regardless of the total impacts to
streams or wetlands from the project_
Water Quality Certification No. 3891 4

Water Quality Certification No. 8891
Installation of culverts in wetlands must ensure continuity of water movement and be
designed to adequately accommodate high water or flood conditions. Additionally, when
roadways, causeways, or other fill projects are constructed across FEMA -designated
floodways or wetlands, openings such as culverts or bridges must be provided to maintain
the natural hydrology of the system as wel! as prevent constriction of the flood:■gay that may
result in destabilization of streams or wetlands.
The establishment of native, woody vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization
techniques must be used where practicable instead of riprap or other bank hardening
methods.
12. Compensatory Mitigation
In accordance with 15A NCAC 02H .0506 (h), compensatory mitigation may be required for
losses of equal to or greater than 150 linear feet of streams (intermittent and perennial)
and/or equal to or greater than one (1) acre of wetlands. For linear public transportation
projects, impacts equal to or exceeding 150 linear feet per stream shall require mitigation.
Buffer mitigation may be required for any project with Buffer Rules in effect at the time of
application for activities classified as "Allowable with Mitigation" or "Prohibited" within the
Table of Uses.
A determination of buffer, wetland, and stream mitigation requirements shall be made for any
General Water Quality Certification for this Nationwide and/or Regional General Permit.
Design and monitoring protocols shall follow the US Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington
District Stream Mitigation Guidelines (April 2003) or its subsequent updates. Compensatory
mitigation plans shall be submitted to the Division for written approval as required in those
protocols. The mitigation plan must be implemented and/or constructed before any impacts
occur on site. Alternatively, the Division will accept payment into an in -lieu fee program or a
mitigation bank. In these cases, proof of payment shall be provided to the Division before
any impacts occur on site.
13. If an environmental document is required under the National or State Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA or SEPA), then this General Certification is not valid until a Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) or Record of Decision (ROD) is issued by the State
Clearinghouse.
14. In the twenty (20) coastal counties, the appropriate DWQ Regional Office must be contacted
to determine if Coastal Stormwater Regulations will be required_
15. This General Certification does not relieve the applicant of the responsibility to obtain all other
required Federal, State, or Local approvals.
16. The applicant/permittee and their authorized agents shall conduct all activities in a manner
consistent with State water quality standards (including any requirements resulting from
compliance with §303(d) of the Clean Water Act), and any other appropriate requirements of
State and Federal Law. If the Division determines that such standards or laws are not being
met, including failure to sustain a designated or achieved use, or that State or Federal law is
being violated, or that further conditions are necessary to assure compliance, then the
Division may reevaluate and modify this General Water Quality Certification.
Water Quality Certification No. 3891

Water Quality Certification No. 3891
17. When written authorization is required for use of this certification, upon completion of all
permitted impacts included within the approval and any subsequent modifications, the
applicant shall be required to return the certificate of completion attached to the approval.
One copy of the certificate shall be sent to the DWQ Central Office in Raleigh at 1650 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
18_ Additional site-specific conditions, including monitoring and/or modeling requirements, may
be added to the written approval letter for projects proposed under this Water Quality
Certification in order to ensure compliance with all applicable water quality and effluent
standards.
19. This certification grants permission to the director, an authorized representative of the
Director, or DENR staff, upon the presentation of proper credentials, to enter the property
during normal business hours.
This General Certification shall expire on the same day as the expiration date of the
corresponding Nationwide and/or Regional General Permit. The conditions in effect on the date
of issuance of Certification for a specific project shall remain in effect for the life of the project,
regardless of the expiration date of this Certification.
Non-compliance with or violation of the conditions herein set forth by a specific project may result
in revocation of this General Certification for the project and may also result in criminal and/or civil
penalties.
The Director of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality may require submission of a formal
application for Individual Certification for any project in this category of activity if it is determined
that the project is likely to have a significant adverse effect upon water quality, including state or
federally listed endangered or threatened aquatic species, or degrade the waters so that existing
uses of the wetland or downstream waters are precluded.
Public hearings may be held for specific applications or group of applications prior to a
Certification decision if deemed in the public's best interest by the Director of the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality.
Effective date: March 19, 2012
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
By
7,71 fl -
Charles
-Charles Wakild, P.E.
Director
History Note: Water Quality Certification (WQC) Number 3891 issued March 19, 2012 replaces
WQC 3701 issued November 1, 2007, WQC Number 3632 issued March 2007 WQC Number
3403 issued March 2003; WQC Number 3361 issued March 18, 2002; WQC Number 3107 issued
February 11, 1997; WQC Number 2734 issued May 1 1993; and WQC Number 2670 issued on
January 21, 1992. This General Certification is rescinded when the Corps of Engineers
reauthorizes any of the corresponding Nationwide and/or Regional General Permits or when
deemed appropriate by the Director of the Division of Water Quality.
Water Quality Certification No. 3891

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW -2011-01.658 County: Beaufort U.S.G.S. Quad: NC-BEL.HAVEN
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner: Town of Belhaven
Dr. Guinn Leverett
Address: POB 220
Belhaven, NC, 27810
A ent: Kimlev-Horn and Associates -
Anna Reusche
Address: 3001 Weston Parkway
Carv, NC, 27513
Size and location of property (water body, road name/number, town, etc.): Bridge 324 over Wynns Gut on Water Street, in
Belhaven, Beaufort County, NC. Latitude 35.53773 Longitude -76.62235
'Description of projects area and activity: Replace structurally deficient and functionally obsolete 52' bridge with new 51.5'
bridge in exisitng location using an offsite detour. 0.016 acres of fill are authorized for backfill in the endbent footprints.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
® Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number or Nationwide Permit Number: 23
SEE ATTACHED NATIONWIDE AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS.
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted application and attached information dated July 7, 2011. Any violation of the attached
conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or
appropriate legal action.
This verification is valid until the NWP is modified, reissued, or revoked. All of the existing NWPs are scheduled to be modified,
reissued, or revoked prior to March 18, 2012. It is incumbent upon you to remain informed of changes to the NWPs. We will issue a
public notice when the NWPs are reissued. Furthermore, if you commence or are under contract to commence this activity before the
date that the relevant nationwide permit is modified or revoked, you will have twelve (12) months from the date of the modification or
revocation of the NWP to complete the activity under the present terms and conditions of this nationwide permit.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone].
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact Thomas Steffens at 910-251-4615.
STEFFENS.THOMAS.A
Corps Regulatory Official NCRUM.1284706273 Date: 09/08/2011
Expiration Date of Verification: 03/18/2012
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so,
please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Survey or visit http://per2.nn.usace.g my.mit/survey.html to complete the survey
online.
Copy Furnished: Anna Reusche, WPIT, Kimley-Horn and Associates. Inc
UT

Determination of Jurisdiction:
A. ® Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above described project
area. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process
( Reference 33 CFR .Part 33 1).
B. ® There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
C. ❑ There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
D. ❑ The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference
jurisdictional determination issued Action I.D
Basis For Determination
The site exhibits an Ordinary Nish Water Mark as indicated by changes in soil character and the absence of terrestrial
vegetation and is a direct tributary_of Pungo Creek, a traditionally navigable water.
Remarks
Attention USDA Program Participants
This del ineation/determ inati on has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B. and C.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. Ifyou object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn: Thomas Steffens
Washington Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1000
Washington, North Carolina
27889
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the District Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the District Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence."
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date 09/08/2011. Expiration Date

Action ID Number: SAW -2011-01658 County: Beaufort
Permittee: Town of Belhaven, Bridge over Wynns Gut
Date Permit Issued: 09/08/2011
Project Manager: Thomas Steffens
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit,
sign this certification and return it to the following address:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Attn: Thomas Steffens
Washington Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1000
Washington, North Carolina
27889
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers representative. If you fail to comply with this permit you are subject to permit suspension,
modification, or revocation.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in
accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee
Date

U.S. Department YAUFax-
Commander 431 Crawford Street
Homeland SecuriUnited Slates Coast Guard Portsmouth, Va. 23704-5004
Fifth Coast Guard District Staff Symbol: (dpb)
United States Phone: [phone]
. 757-398-6334
Coast Guard Email: [e-mail]
16591 C
12 SEP 11
Ms. Beth Reed
Kimberly -Horn and Associates, Inc.
3001 Weston Parkway
Cary, NC 27513
Dear Ms. Reed
Review of your proposed bridge replacement project is complete. Based on the documentation
provided and that no comments were received to Public Notice 5-1233, it is determined that a
formal Coast Guard bridge permit will not be required for the proposed replacement of the
Water Street Bridge across Wynn's Gut, mile 0.1, at Belhaven, Beaufort County, NC. The
project will be placed in our Advance Approval category as per Title 33 Code of Federal
Regulations Part 115.70. This Advance Approval determination is for the location and
construction of the Water Street Bridge across Wynn's Gut, mile 0.1 and is valid for five years
from the date of this letter. If the construction does not commence within this time period, you
must contact this office for reaffirmation of this authorization. Future bridge projects along the
same waterway will have to be independently evaluated before they may be considered for
Advance Approval.
The fact that a Coast Guard bridge permit is not required does not relieve you of the
responsibility for compliance with the requirements of any other Federal, State, or local agency
who may have jurisdiction over any aspect of the project.
Although the project will not require a bridge permit, other areas of Coast Guard jurisdiction
apply. The following must be met:
a. This office should be notified as soon as possible to commencement and completion of
bridgework so that appropriate announcements may be prepared.
The lowest portion of the superstructure of the bridge across the waterway should clear
the 100 -year flood height elevation, if feasible.
The National Ocean Service (NOS) of the National Oceanic and Atmosphere Administration
(NOAA) is responsible for maintaining the charts of U.S. waters; therefore, they must be notified
of this proposed work. You must notify our office and the NOS upon completion of the activity
approved in this letter. Your notification of completion must include as -built drawings, which
certifies the location and clearance of the bridge that was constructed. This information will be
sent to the following address:

16591 C
12 SEP 11
Mr. Douglas Harpine
National Ocean Service
N/CS26, Room 7317
1315 East-West Highway
Silver Spring, MD 20910-3282
An email dated July 21, 2011, requested a bridge lighting exemption for this proposed
replacement bridge due to no significant nighttime navigation. As per Title 33 Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 118.40(b), the bridge is hereby exempt from Coast Guard navigational lighting
requirements. This lighting exemption is subject to review and revocation in the future, provided
conditions change or are found to differ significantly from those indicated in your request.
If you have any questions please contact Lindsey Middleton at 757-398-6629 or
Lindsey. R. [e-mail].
Sincerely
Fifth Coast Guard District
Copy: Coast Guard Sector North Carolina, Waterways Management
PA

Categorical Exclusion Action
Classification Form
(Signed)

CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
TIP Project No.
State Contract No.
W.B.S. No.
Federal Project No.
A. Project Description:
B-4500
B501450
33733.1.1
BRZ-0210(7)
The purpose of this project is to replace Bridge No. 324, carrying Water Street over Wynn's Gut,
a tributary of Pantego Creek and the Pungo River, in Belhaven, Beaufort County. Bridge No. 324
is 52 feet long. The replacement structure will be a bridge 51.5 feet long. The current
bulkheads under the bridge are a part of the existing structure and will also be replaced. The
bridge will include two 11 -foot lanes, curb and gutter, and 5 -foot sidewalks on both sides. The
roadway grade of the new structure will be approximately the same as the existing structure,
varying one foot or less from the existing ground.
The approach roadway will extend approximately 100 feet from the west end of the new bridge
and 125 feet from the east end of the new bridge. The approaches will include a 24 -foot
pavement width providing two travel lanes no wider than 12 feet. Curb and gutter and five-
foot wide sidewalks will be provided on each side. The roadway is a local collector and will be
designed with a 25 mile per hour design speed.
Figures 1, 2, and 3 include study area mapping and project photos. Traffic will be detoured off-
site during construction.
B. Purpose and Need:
NCDOT Bridge Management Unit records indicate Bridge No. 324 has a sufficiency rating of 22.6
out of a possible 100 for a new structure. The posted weight limit on the bridge is down to 8
tons for single vehicles and 14 tons for truck -tractor semi -trailers. The bridge is considered
structurally deficient. It has a structure condition appraisal of 2 out of 9 (Item 67 on the Bridge
Inspection Report). According to Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) standards, the bridge
is eligible for FHWA's Highway Bridge Program.
The superstructure of Bridge No. 324 is made of a reinforced concrete floor on timber joists and
steel I -beams. The substructure consists of timber caps on timber piles. Timber components
have a typical life expectancy between 40 to 50 years due to the natural deterioration rate of
wood. Rehabilitation of a timber structure is generally practical only when a few elements are
damaged or prematurely deteriorated. However, past a certain degree of deterioration, most
timber elements become impractical to maintain and upon eligibility are programmed for
replacement. Structural components of bridge No. 324 are experiencing an increasing degree
of deterioration that can no longer be addressed by reasonable maintenance activities, and the
bridge is approaching the end of its useful life.

C. Proposed Improvements:
Circle one or more of the following Type Il improvements which apply to the project:
1. Modernization of a highway by resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation, reconstruction,
adding shoulders, or adding auxiliary lanes (e.g., parking, weaving, turning, climbing).
a. Restoring, Resurfacing, Rehabilitating, and Reconstructing pavement (311 and 411
improvements)
b. Widening roadway and shoulders without adding through lanes
C. Modernizing gore treatments
d. Constructing lane improvements (merge, auxiliary, and turn lanes)
e. Adding shoulder drains
f. Replacing and rehabilitating culverts, inlets, and drainage pipes, including safety
treatments
g. Providing driveway pipes
h. Performing minor bridge widening (less than one through lane)
L Slide Stabilization
j. Structural BMP's for water quality improvement
2. Highway safety or traffic operations improvement projects including the installation of
ramp metering control devices and lighting.
a. Installing ramp metering devices
b. Installing lights
C. Adding or upgrading guardrail
d. Installing safety barriers including Jersey type barriers and pier protection
e. Installing or replacing impact attenuators
f. Upgrading medians including adding or upgrading median barriers
g. Improving intersections including relocation and/or realignment
h. Making minor roadway realignment
L Channelizing traffic
j. Performing clear zone safety improvements including removing hazards and
flattening slopes
k. Implementing traffic aid systems, signals, and motorist aid
I. Installing bridge safety hardware including bridge rail retrofit
3. Bridge rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement or the construction of grade
separation to replace existing at -grade railroad crossings.
a. Rehabilitating, reconstructing, or replacing bridge approach slabs
b. Rehabilitating or replacing bridge decks
C. Rehabilitating bridges including painting (no red lead paint), scour repair, fender
systems, and minor structural improvements
V Replacing a bridge (structure and/or fill)
0

4. Transportation corridor fringe parking facilities.
5. Construction of new truck weigh stations or rest areas.
6. Approvals for disposal of excess right-of-way or for joint or limited use of right-of-way,
where the proposed use does not have significant adverse impacts.
7. Approvals for changes in access control.
8. Construction of new bus storage and maintenance facilities in areas used predominantly
for industrial or transportation purposes where such construction is not inconsistent
with existing zoning and located on or near a street with adequate capacity to handle
anticipated bus and support vehicle traffic.
9. Rehabilitation or reconstruction of existing rail and bus buildings and ancillary facilities
where only minor amounts of additional land are required and there is not a substantial
increase in the number of users.
10. Construction of bus transfer facilities (an open area consisting of passenger shelters,
boarding areas, kiosks and related street improvements) when located in a commercial
area or other high activity center in which there is adequate street capacity for
projected bus traffic.
11. Construction of rail storage and maintenance facilities in areas used predominantly for
industrial or transportation purposes where such construction is not inconsistent with
existing zoning and where there is no significant noise impact on the surrounding
community.
12. Acquisition of land for hardship or protective purposes, advance land acquisition loans
under section 3(b) of the UMT Act. Hardship and protective buying will be permitted
only for a particular parcel or a limited number of parcels. These types of land
acquisition qualify for a CE only where the acquisition will not limit the evaluation of
alternatives, including shifts in alignment for planned construction projects, which may
be required in the NEPA process. No project development on such land may proceed
until the NEPA process has been completed.
13. Acquisition and construction of wetland, stream and endangered species mitigation
sites.
14. Remedial activities involving the removal, treatment or monitoring of soil or
groundwater contamination pursuant to state or federal remediation guidelines.
D. Special Proiect Information:
The estimated costs, based on the 2009-2015 STIP, are as follows:
Prior Year's Cost $120,000
Right of Way $50,000
Construction $500,000
Total $670,000

Estimated Traffic:
Current - <400 vpd
Year 2030 - <400 vpd
Estimated TTST/Dual: 7%
Design Exceptions: There are no anticipated design exceptions for this project.
Bicycle Designation: This portion of Water Street is not a part of a designated bicycle route nor
is it listed in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) as a bicycle project.
Bridge Demolition: Bridge No. 324 is constructed of timber and steel and should be possible to
remove with no resulting debris in the water based on standard demolition practices.
Alternatives Discussion:
No Build — The no build alternative would result in eventually closing the road which is
unacceptable given the Town of Belhaven's commitment to maintain the bridge and preserve
the connectivity along Water Street.
Rehabilitation — The bridge was constructed in 1940, and the timber materials within the
bridge are reaching the end of their useful life. Rehabilitation would require replacing the
timber components which would constitute effectively replacing the bridge.
Offsite Detour — Bridge No. 324 will be replaced on the existing alignment. Traffic will be
detoured offsite (see Figure 2) during the construction period. NCDOT Guidelines for Evaluation
of Offsite Detours for Bridge Replacement Projects considers multiple project variables
beginning with the additional time traveled by the average road user resulting from the offsite
detour. The offsite detour for this project would include Pamlico Street, Main Street, and Allen
Road. The majority of traffic on the road is through traffic. The detour for the average road
user would result in two minutes or less of additional travel time (0.3 miles additional travel). A
9 to 12 -month duration of construction is expected on this project.
Based on the Guidelines, the criteria above indicate that on the basis of delay alone the detour
is acceptable. A representative of Pungo District Hospital (located adjacent to the bridge on the
west side) attended the Citizens Informational Workshop (described below/next page) and
indicated that the detour is acceptable. The hospital's emergency room entrance is located on
the west side of the hospital near Allen Street, and emergency responders arriving from areas
east of Belhaven primarily use Main Street and Allen Street.
Onsite Detour — An onsite detour was not evaluated due to the presence of an acceptable
offsite detour.

Staged Construction — Staged construction would require a temporary bridge beside the
existing roadway alignment, an additional cost for the temporary bridge, and extra right of way.
The existing bridge is not wide enough to phase construction. This option was not considered
further since an acceptable offsite detour is available.
New Alignment — Given that the alignment for Water Street is acceptable, a new alignment was
not considered as an alternative.
Natural Resources:
An Environmental Screening Report was prepared in April 2010. Field investigations by Kimley-
Horn and Associates, Inc. (KHA) staff were conducted on December 4, 2009.
Wetlands — Field investigations by KHA staff determined that no wetland areas are located
within the project study area.
Public Involvement:
A Citizens Informational Workshop was held on Tuesday, February 23, 2010 at the Belhaven
Town Hall. Eleven citizens attended, and two comment sheets were received. Adjoining
property owners requested that the navigable waterway remain high/wide enough for existing
boat traffic to continue use after the bridge is replaced. The second written comment received
expressed concern over frequent flooding in Belhaven, suggesting flood gates under this bridge.
Permits:
The US Coast Guard is responsible for administering Section 9 of the Rivers and Harbors Act. A
Section 9 permit is required for construction or modification of all bridges spanning navigable
waters. In lieu of the Coast Guard Bridge Permit, an Advance Approval (AA) process has been
established to reduce the permit burden for bridges over waterways in which only small craft
navigate and that typically have no adverse effects on the environment. Based upon
correspondence with the Coast Guard and NCDOT Natural Environment Unit staff, it is
anticipated that this project will follow the AA process.
Other Agency Comments:
The North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission (NCWRC) provided a project -specific
comment that the area around B-4500 is characterized by higher salinity water primarily
supporting species under the jurisdiction of the NC Division of Marine Fisheries (NCDMF).
Coordination should be initiated with NCDMF to address impacts to aquatic species. NCWRC
recommends replacing this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply. According
to subsequent correspondence with NCDMF and NCWRC (documented in the Environmental
Screening Report, April 2010), the project study area is not designated as anadromous fish
spawning habitat or a primary nursery area.

The NCDENR Division of Water Quality (NCDENR-DWQ) provided the following project -specific
comments:
- Wynn's Gut is classified as an SC, NSW stream and is listed on the current 303(d) list for
Chlorophyll a.
- Pantego Creek and associated tributaries, including Wynn's Gut, are class SC, NSW
waters of the State. NCDWQ is very concerned with sediment and erosion impacts that
could result from this project. The NCDWQ recommends that highly protective
sediment and erosion control BMPs be implemented to reduce the risk of nutrient
runoff to Wynn's Gut. The NCDWQ requests that road design plans provide treatment
of the storm water runoff through best management practices as detailed in the most
recent version of NCDWQ's Stormwater Best Management Practices.
- This project is within the Tar -Pamlico River Basin. Riparian buffer impacts shall be
avoided and minimized to the greatest extent possible pursuant to 15A NCAC 26.0259.
Copies of all letters received in response to the Scoping Letter (November 2009) are attached.
E. Threshold Criteria
The following evaluation of threshold criteria must be completed for Type 11 actions
ECOLOGICAL
YES NO
(1)
Will the project have a substantial impact on any
unique or important natural resource?
X
(2)
Does the project involve habitat where federally
listed endangered or threatened species may occur?
X
(3)
Will the project affect anadromous fish?
❑
X
(4)
If the project involves wetlands, is the amount of
permanent and/or temporary wetland taking less than
one-tenth (1/10) of an acre and have all practicable measures
to avoid and minimize wetland takings been evaluated?
N/A
❑
(5)
Will the project require the use of U. S. Forest Service lands?
X
(6)
Will the quality of adjacent water resources be adversely
impacted by proposed construction activities?
X
(7)
Does the project involve waters classified as Outstanding
Water Resources (OWR) and/or High Quality Waters (HQW)?
X

(8) Will the project require fill in waters of the United States
in any of the designated mountain trout counties? X
(9) Does the project involve any known underground storage
tanks (UST's) or hazardous materials sites? X
PERMITS AND COORDINATION
YES NO
(10)
If the project is located within a CAMA county, will the
YES
NO
(15)
project significantly.affect the coastal zone and/or any
"Area of Environmental Concern" (AEC)?
X*
(11)
Does the project involve Coastal Barrier Resources Act
resources?
X
(12)
Will a U. S. Coast Guard permit be required?
human health and environmental effect on any minority or
❑
X
(13)
Could the project result in the modification of any existing
X
(18)
regulatory floodway?
X
(14)
Will the project require any stream relocations or channel
X
(19)
changes?
a
X
SOCIAL. ECONOMIC, AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
YES
NO
(15)
Will the project induce substantial impacts to planned
growth or land use for the area?
X
(16)
Will the project require the relocation of any family or
business?
X
(17)
Will the project have a disproportionately high and adverse
human health and environmental effect on any minority or
low-income population?
X
(18)
If the project involves the acquisition of right of way, is the
❑
amount of right of way acquisition considered minor?
X
(19)
Will the project involve any changes in access control?
a
X
(20)
Will the project substantially alter the usefulness
and/or land use of adjacent property?
X

SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND CULTURAL RESOURCES (Continued)
YES NO
(21)
Will the project have an adverse effect on permanent
local traffic patterns or community cohesiveness?
X
(22)
Is the project included in an approved thoroughfare plan
and/or Transportation Improvement Program (and is,
therefore, in conformance with the Clean Air Act of 1990)?
X ❑
(23)
Is the project anticipated to cause an increase in traffic
volumes?
❑ X
(24)
Will traffic be maintained during construction using existing
roads, staged construction, or on-site detours?
X ❑
(25)
If the project is a bridge replacement project, will the bridge
be replaced at its existing location (along the existing facility)
and will all construction proposed in association with the
bridge replacement project be contained on the existing
X
facility?
(26)
Is there substantial controversy on social, economic, or
environmental grounds concerning the project?
X
(27)
Is the project consistent with all Federal, State, and local laws
relating to the environmental aspects of the project?
X ❑
(28)
Will the project have an "effect" on structures/properties
eligible for or listed on the National Register of Historic Places?
X
(29)
Will the project affect any archaeological remains which are
important to history or pre -history?
X
(30)
Will the project require the use of Section 4(f) resources
(public parks, recreation lands, wildlife and waterfowl refuges,
historic sites, or historic bridges, as defined in Section 4(f)
of the U. S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966)?
X
(31)
Will the project result in any conversion of assisted public
recreation sites or facilities to non -recreation uses, as defined
by Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Act
of 1965, as amended?
X
(32)
Will the project involve construction in, across, or adjacent
to a river designated as a component of or proposed for
inclusion in the National System of Wild and Scenic Rivers?
X

F. Additional Documentation Required for Unfavorable Responses in Part E
Response to Question 2: Manatees are considered seasonal inhabitants of North Carolina
typically occurring in June through October. This species inhabits a
variety of habitats including shallow coastal bays, lagoons, estuaries,
and inland rivers of varying salinity. Manatees typically inhabit
waters with depths ranging from 1.5 to 6 meters (about 5 to 20 feet).
Although water depths within the project study area are marginally
sufficient for manatee (the average water depth at the bridge is
approximately 3.3 feet and transitions to 5.3 feet about 100 feet
downstream of the bridge), according to the US Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS), Wynn's Gut would be considered suitable habitat
for manatee. The USFWS has prepared precautionary measures for
construction activities in waters used by manatee (Guidelines for
Avoiding Impacts to the West Indian Manatee, lune 2003). According
to USFWS, if these guidelines are implemented by the contractor
during construction, the project should not have an adverse impact to
manatee. Correspondence with USFWS indicating concurrence with a
Biological Conclusion of No Effect and the above referenced
document are attached.
* Clarification for Question 10: The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources — Division of Coastal Management (NCDENR-DCM)
commented that it "appears that Public Trust Area and Public Trust
Shoreline Areas of Environmental Concern (AECs) will be impacted
and a Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) permit will be required."
It is anticipated that the proposed bridge replacement will qualify for
authorization under a CAMA General Permit with no significant
effects to any AEC.
Response to Questions 28 / 30: Bridge No. 324 is located on the edge of the Belhaven Historic
District, a property eligible for listing in the National Register of
Historic Places. Through coordination with the State Historic
Preservation Office (HPO) and Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA), FHWA intends to make a de minimis ruling based on the HPO
concurrence that this project will have "no adverse effect" on the
Belhaven Historic District. HPO has concurred with this finding and
issued a "no adverse effect" call based on the use of the Texas Classic
rail and 8 -inch non -mountable curb along the bridge.
Correspondence and a drawing/plan sheet are attached.

G. CE Approval
TIP Project No. B-4500 State Contract No. 8501450
WBS No. 33733.1.1 Federal Project No. BRZ-0210(7)
Project Description:
The purpose of this project is to replace Bridge No. 324, carrying Water Street over Wynn's Gut,
a tributary of Pantego Creek and the Pungo River, in Belhaven, Beaufort County, Bridge No. 324
is 52 feet long. The replacement structure will be a bridge 51.5 feet long. The current
bulkheads under the bridge are a part of the existing structure and will also be replaced. The
bridge will include two 11 -foot lanes, curb and gutter, and 5 -foot sidewalks on both sides. The
roadway grade of the new structure will be approximately the same as the existing structure,
varying one foot or less from the existing ground.
The approach roadway will extend approximately 100 feet from the west end of the new bridge
and 125 feet from the east end of the new bridge. The approaches will include a 24 -foot
pavement width providing two travel lanes no wider than 12 feet. Curb and gutter and five-
foot wide sidewalks will be provided on each side. The roadway is a local collector and will be
designed with a 25 mile per hour design speed.
Categorical Exclusion Action Classification:
TYPE II(A)
Approved: I
S �J; � t i v ✓ '—�-�.-,fir, l 'r- - `, r � r...
Date Meredith H. Van Ddyn, P.E., Project
Kimley"Horn and Associates, Inc.
Date
Difte
Date
Dr. Guinn Levereft, Town Manager
Town of Belhaven, North Carolina
61MA.& MI
./ TYPE II(B)
neer
William T. Goodwin, Jr.,-P.E., Bridge Project Development Engineer
North Carolina Department of Transportation
t'John F. Sullivan, ill, P.E., Division Administrator
' Federal Highway Administration
or,
OCT 15 2012

Pre -Construction Notification Application

E=F1 Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
July 6, 2011
Mr. Tom Steffens
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Regulatory Field Office
PO Box 1000
Washington, NC 27889
Mr. Garcy Ward
NC Division of Water Quality
1419 US Highway 17
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Re: Waterstreet Bridge Replacement -Bridge No. 324
Nationwide Permit #23 Application Submittal
Belhaven, Beaufort County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Steffens and Mr. Ward:
On behalf of the Town of Belhaven, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. is submitting the enclosed joint
404/401 Preconstruction Notification Application and Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
for authorization to construct the above referenced project under a Nationwide Permit #23 and General
Water Quality Certification #3701. This project is included in the 2009-2015 NCDOT Transportation
Improvement Program as Project B-4500. A Programmatic Categorical Exclusion has been approved for
this project and signed by NCDOT (9/2/10) and FHWA (9/16/10). Field review of the project area was
conducted by the USACE (Tom Steffens), NCDWQ (Garcy Ward), and NCDCM (Stephen Lane) on July
22, 2010. The following information is included as part of this application submittal:
• Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) form
• Project Vicinity (Figure 1)
• USGS Topographic Map (Figure 2)
• Aerial Photograph (Figure 3)
• Soils Map (Figure 4)
• FEMA Floodmap (Figure 5)
• Permit Drawings (Sheets 1-5)
• Agent Authorization Form
• Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request Form
• Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (signed)
NCDOT Bridge Management Unit records indicate Bridge No. 324, constructed in 1940, has a
sufficiency rating of 22.6 out of a possible 100 for a new structure. The posted weight limit on the bridge
is down to 8 tons for single vehicles and 14 tons for truck -tractor semi -trailers. The bridge is considered
structurally deficient.
The purpose of this project is to replace the Water Street Bridge (Bridge #324) over Wynn's Gut, a
tributary of Pantego Creek in Belhaven, Beaufort County, North Carolina. The current bulkheads under
the bridge are part of the existing structure and will also be replaced. Bridge No. 324 is constructed of
'' r�S?

timber and steel and should be possible to remove with no resulting debris in the water based on standard
demolition practices. The bridge will be replaced on the existing alignment with traffic being detoured
offsite during the construction period.
The project site begins in front of the Pungo District Hospital and proceeds in a southeast direction across
the tributary to the intersection with Wynn's Gut Lane before ending in front of the building for the
Community Developers of Beaufort. In addition to the bridge replacement, this project will also consist
of new grading and paving for the locations immediately surrounding the bridge to tie the new bridge to
the existing roadway.
The site consists of areas along Water Street and the bridge carrying Water Street across Wynn's Gut.
The main drainageway for the area is Wynn's Gut. Wynn's Gut flows to Pantego Creek which flows to
the Pungo River which ultimately discharges into the Pamlico Sound. Land use in the vicinity of the site
is urban including the Pungo District Hospital to the west, the marina to the east, residential and
commercial development to the north, and open water to the south.
All the soils in this area are classified as urban land (Ur) with more than 85 percent of the surface area
covered with streets, buildings, parking lots, and airports. This area has been greatly altered by cutting,
filling, grading, and shaping. Slopes range from 0-6 percent.
The project is approximately 0.06 miles in length. Approximately 0.21 acres will be disturbed during the
construction of this project. Bridge no. 324 is 52 feet long. The replacement structure will be a bridge of
51.5 feet in length. The current bulkheads under the bridge will be replaced. The proposed bridge will
include two 11 -foot lanes, curb and gutter, and 5 -foot sidewalks on both sides. The roadway grade of the
new structure will be approximately the same as the existing structure, varying one foot or less for the
existing ground. In addition, approximately 0.09 acres will be stabilized with grass and permanent
plantings.
Authorization is being requested for 0.042 acre of temporary impact to jurisdictional waters (Wynn's Gut)
associated with the removal of the existing 3 span bridge which is being replaced with a single span
structure and 0.016 acre of permanent impact associated with fill required for the bulkhead replacement.
In addition, the bridge replacement will impact 1,581 sq ft. of Zone 1 Tar -Pamlico riparian buffers and
609 sq ft. of Zone 2 buffer. There are no jurisdictional wetlands located within the project area.
If there is any additional information you need to assist in the processing of this application, please do not
hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Anna Reusche, WPIT
Copy: Dr. Guinn Leverett, Belhaven Town Manager
Stephen Lane, NCDCM

O� 4 W A TE9OG
> i
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre -Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit F1 Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 23 or General Permit (GP) number: 3701
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
® Yes
❑ No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
I ® Yes
❑ No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Waterstreet Bridge Replacement -Bridge No. 324
2b. County:
Beaufort
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Belhaven
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
B-4500
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Town of Belhaven
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Dr. Guinn Leverett, Town Manager
3d. Street address:
P.O. Box 220
3e. City, state, zip:
Belhaven, NC 27810
3f. Telephone no.:
[phone]
3g. Fax no.:
[phone]
3h. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
® Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Anna Reusche, WPIT
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
5c. Street address:
3001 Weston Parkway
5d. City, state, zip:
Cary, NC 27513
5e. Telephone no.:
[phone]
5f. Fax no.:
[phone]
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
NA
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.53773 Longitude: - 76.62235
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
0.21 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Wynn's Gut a tributary to Pantego Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
SC,NSW
2c. River basin:
Tar -Pamlico River Basin
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site consists of the Water Street Bridge (No. 324) over Wynn's Gut, a tributary of Pantego Creek. The site is
bordered to the west by the Pungo District Hospital, Belhaven waterway marina to the east, commercial properties to the
north, and open water to the south.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
No wetlands are present.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
100 feet, Wynn's Guti
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to replace bridge no. 324 carrying Water Street over Wynn's Gut. Structural
components of bridge no. 324 are experiencing an increasing degree of deterioration that can no longer be addressed by
reasonable maintenance activities and the bridge is approaching the end of its useful life.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Bridge no. 324 is 52 feet long. The replacement structure will be a bridge of 51.5 feet in length. The existing bulkheads
under the bridge will be replaced. The proposed bridge will include two 11 -foot lanes, curb and gutter, and 5 -foot
sidewalks on both sides. The roadway grade of the new structure will be approximately the same as the existing
structure, varying one foot or less for the existing ground.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: A Preliminary Jurisdictional Request is being
submitted in conjunction with this application.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
®Preliminary Final
❑
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Kimley-Horn and
Associates, Inc.
Name (if known): Beth Reed, PWS
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Tom Steffens (USACE), Garcy Ward (NCDWQ), and Stephen Lane (NCDCM) reviewed the delineation on July 22, 2010.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination request is being submitted in conjunction with this application.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
® Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments: No wetlands are present.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments: No streams are present.
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ®P ❑ T
Wynn's Gut
Fill
Tributary
0.016
02 ❑ PH T
Wynn's Gut
Removal of existing piles
Tributary
0.042
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑PFIT
4L Total open water impacts
0.016
4g. Comments: Temportary impacts to Wynn's Gut will result from the removal of the existing piles and bridge span bulkhead.
Permanent impacts will result from the replacement of the existing bulkheads.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose
of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
K Total
5g. Comments: No ponds or lakes will be impacted.
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑Tar -Pamlico El Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number—
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
Fill &
B1 ®P ❑ T
erosion
control
Wynn's Gut
❑ Yes
® No
1,581
609
devices
B2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
El Yes
B3 ❑P❑T
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
1,581
609
6i. Comments: Zone 1 impacts will result from fill associated with the new bulkheads. Zone 2 impacts will result from the
installation of the erosion control devices at Water Street.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
All practical measures have been taken to avoid and minimize impacts to the riparian buffers and open waters. The original
design for the proposed project called for swales to be cut through the riparian buffers in order to control runoff from the
adjacent roadway. The swales were removed from the design in order to eliminate ground disturbance within the riparian
buffers.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Turbidity curtains were placed outside of the existing bulkheads to catch sediment that may be disturbed during construction
of the new bulkheads.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
F-1 Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments: Bridge construction is designated as allowable under the Tar -Pamlico Riparian Buffer rules.
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: The project is a bridge replacement. Only a small amount of impervious
❑ Yes ® No
will be added. It is not possible to collect stormwater from the new impervious area
and release it diffusely outside the buffer due to the flat topography and other
contstraints.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
35.4%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: The proposed project is located entirely
within NCDOT right-of-way and less than 10,000 square feet of built upon area will be
impacted. Therefore, the proposed
project will be covered under NCDOT's NPDES permit and will not requre a state stormwater permit.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Belhaven (No program)
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
® Other: NCDOT NPDES
Program
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
❑ Session Law 2006-246
(check all that apply):
® Other: NCDOT NPDES
Program
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes
❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes
❑ No
F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
® Yes
❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes' to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
® Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
Comments: A Programmatic Categorical Exclusion has been approved by the N.C.
® Yes
❑ No
Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Town of Belhaven,
and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc (agent). A copy of the signed Categorical
Exclusion Action Classification Form is inlcuded in this application submittal.
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes' to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The pupose of the project is to replace bridge no. 324 which has been determined to be structually deficiant. The project
is not inteded to induce growth. In addition, areas around the project site are currently developed.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater will be discharged as a result of this project.
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
® Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
® Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
According to the USFWS, Wynn's Gut would be considered suitable habitat for the West Indian Manatee.
Correspondence with the USFWS indicates that as long as the Guidelines for Avoiding Impacts to the West Indian
Manatee (June, 2003) are implemented, the project should not have an adverse impact to the manatee (email
communication; Gary Jordan, USFWS - 06/03/2010).
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
According the NC Division of Marine Fisheries (email communication; Kevin Hart - 4/5/2010) and the NC Wildlife
resources Commission (email communication; Travis Wilson - 4/8/2010), the project study area (Wynn's Gut) is not
designated as anadromous fish spawning habitat or a primary nursery area.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Based upon a review of mapping at the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) in Raleigh, NC on April 5, 2010, there
are no known National Registar listed properties, properties eligible for listing, or historic districts within the project study
area. The project study area is adjacent to the Belhaven Historic District and the Belhaven Commercial District. Based
upon a review of mapping at the State Office of Archaeology on April 5, 2010, there are no known archaeological
resources within the project study area.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: The bridge to be replaced is located on a tributary to Pungo Creek
that was not studied as a part of the effective FEMA Flood Insurance Study (FIS). The flood hazards designated at the
bridge location on the effective Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) are associated with storm surge flooding. Because the
tributary has not been studied by FEMA, and because of the bridge's location within a coastal flooding area, FEMA
coordination was not required. This was confirmed by the North Carolina Department of Transportation, which reviewed
and approved the bridge replacement design and associated hydraulic study.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA floodmaps panel number 3720760400J,
Effective May 15, 2003.
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Date
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant !!! 111
isprovided.)
REC.:I N7LD
OCT 15 2012
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Figures

32
45
99
64
99
1 in = 115 miles 92 1 in = 10 miles
0
o•
�o
G
oa �G `
90 dy 090
r Sr S
5`
d
264
��c g
o
5�`c �oa� rid
anteg
99 90
0-S� Sf Z o �o
,% m
J
anS
ter St
Legend
0 1,000 2,000 4,000 v
Project Location Feet w'+ E
Open Water 1 inch = 2,000 feet s
Title
--Prepared
VICINITY MAP
or:
Project
Water Street Bridge Replacement (Bridge No.324 Over Wynn's Gut)
Town of Belhaven, North Carolina
C A
Date
06/14/
KHA Project Number
Figure
011019003
1

•° ! x
�\\ fie..., - _ _a`. J ' I, ,` �•\ .: `tea
MA
BM
?. e • Cts`,. __ ��\�\ _ i /• ` ' /,
Belhaven ii,
ar
Belbavi
Cedar �0•f� >'. is�•� Qi
Island, �', •� i � ?i `�. •�tE.��..%'•ti � ��' }',.-. �a.._ ti -•c" i
o .,\ Gum Ot :. f />\ t ^• �d�.� -.. mss .
a � �„ • / � `\ % � s s" ' - �`K
�eys Pt
_ ei aloe.`_
- •o6 �. /
` 'pt
1_ 1 J
Tego FM 2 *' 1� -�A�
41
Persimmon Tree Pty
Legend I 0 1,000 2,000 4,000rK 1) /Y/-►�
Feet W+E
Project Location �� 1 inch = 2,000 feet ��FVSS
TT
Title
USGS MAP (BELHAVEN)
Prepared For:
Project
Water Street Bridge Replacement (Bridge No.324 Over Wynn's Gut
Town of Belhaven, North Carolina
`
Date
06/14/
T Project Number
011019003
Figure
2

` 2007 Aerial Courtesy of NC On6 l;Vlap
r.
R
i
Za
�
call.
— 1
n
r
f �
A `
6�1
g
e��f � / �✓� ��� � '/:`3,'11

Title
FEMA FLOOD ZONE MAP (PANEL 7604, EFF. DATE 5/15/2003)
Project
Water Street Bridge Replacement (Bridge No.324 Over Wynn's Gut)
Town of Belhaven, North Carolina
r ■ t ° [ n I f i n4 • » °
- • .. a - R_.
a
' ar #! z •
a �!.
• • v s • •� `!r � `.• .' � z < • a '
M1ly
a - '•W. °x• � •< .. n
»
:s • 3 a ` <# -< y s•n �' e.! L
�'
. ■ ` °
Rif :• W •••� ' Hd! . d n •
,fit .s� /
- i ., . k /fit .f • .' ..r
< • • • i� 1i err`- 'r Y�
•..� r ♦u. <
S a a - n
.� rte` ♦�• • a r a � .
Q
-
ay•••.: ;:+• i• •#.y x.R R -!.. < t.' •
•. I•r .'.a #•R, x •
� a r • t l
!_�•a.
rlw • ,■aisl •• •••° »•! < •■R•W
,. � t•.1, •a •••
Y, !•
,<
�� ■ Y w v 1••• x a. A e a r f a t , a.
• • • •• • + ia• i " • • •�. •x° ■ • � •■ f ,a , ° • •`® vl ° • . `
r.• a_
.. . v •
a R _ ..
s• R ,< aA a _. 'y '
•1• i • ••r••ay°f < A ° •l !■• • •..#•
•
rs•Q as •z�{`E • a1f •■n - .: v
■ R
!•a
• y !
• WW1 r■t#■ `•■< • <•■
:•I�'"�•. a.°'
r
• r#.
'<
' r•a •°`
� ■ o.•• tw •° as ■ •e •• iar ■ •# � # # • . ..
., ° • _ .
f
al
• ♦/
•-.•• a# •••a■a•
+
6•
•. •a f
•< W t<• i W'r b • •
* R/ A W..f y •
••r ♦ • tId i � a • � r • •:F-° Y #. t• � • fi':• •'.l r ■ f t ■ # a t <
a
_ I.: .
>
- ■ •• ' v
a•
• • ##° a • a a Y f 11 Q 4 W ■.� ■,• ■ # • fk • ,.• f / • <.• !
� . ' a W • r t • ■ .• • • i • a k • t. •�.• • • a • l e • f
,
f • l ■ z ' r ♦ ° .
{ � ,�_ # • • ' e
� #
1l• f*••• #• Y {/••## v <t••al A <♦ '
•
�, •.w •<,°•, ) as
,. I # �
r♦; i �<'` . w.• ♦ t � • • �: b•wA •
4 # • E Ea■. • i•°••s - Rwa . !
•
• a
•• •••.•f i •aw• •i •,.
Legend ; . " " •'
�� .,
-
�.
� °
.• ;� ,:•,....' ..'`
0 150
300 600 •.
FEMAZoneAE • W ■ , # , , r .• < , -:
/�1�
Feet w.`�/ !
1 inch = 300 feet
Project Boundary
s
Title
FEMA FLOOD ZONE MAP (PANEL 7604, EFF. DATE 5/15/2003)
Project
Water Street Bridge Replacement (Bridge No.324 Over Wynn's Gut)
Town of Belhaven, North Carolina
Prepared For:
�/�
ON
Date
06/1
KHA Project Number
011019003
Figure
5

Permit Drawings
RL LIVED
CCT 1 IS 2012

BYP
264
Z<
99 QO"
O
'Jty�S as'
�R Q'
P�
Gy
CO
SfR �t
E
FFr y,�g.
�o
P�
Q
5~
e06
PROJECT 10 s
h 10
LOCATION p
Ftmw kvER Z `
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
ATER STREET
O M
11
GRAPHIC SCALE IMPACT 1
50 0 50 /00 FIGURES 3-5
(IN FEET)
I INCH = l00 FT
EM" Kimley-Horn TOWN OF BELHAVEN
and Associates, Inc. WATER STREET PROJECT CORRIDOR SHEET
0,2011
1Pon ORiw Rox 33068 BRIDGE REPLACEMENT I OF 5
2011
/
Raleigh, Noah Carolina 17676 JUNE G V y L 0 1 1

IMPACTS
TEMPORARY
OPEN WATERI
AEC IMPACTS
PERMANENT
OPEN WATERI
AEC IMPACTS
RIPARIAN
BUFFER
IMPACTS
BZ 1:
1581 SF
(0.036 AC)
1814 SF
718 SF
PERPENDICULAR
IMPACT ONE
BZ 2:
(0.042 AC)
(0.016 AC)
609 SF
(0.014 AC)
PERPENDICULAR
BZ 1:
1581 SF
(0.036 AC)
TOTAL
1814 SF
718 SF
PERPENDICULAR
IMPACTS
BZ 2:
(0.042 AC)
(0.016 AC)
609 SF
(0.014 AC)
PERPENDICULAR
CIM"Kimley-Horn TOWN OF BELHAVEN
mand Associates, Inc. WATER STREET IMPACT SUMMARY SHEET
0'201Pen OHk, Bow 33068 BRIDGE REPLACEMENT r 2 OF S
Raleigh, N. h C—lim 27636 JUNE 6 y 2011

GRAPHIC SCALE
25 0 25 50
(IN FEET)
(INCH = 50 FT
BRYANT & CLAUDIA BAKER
DB 655 PG 636
PC E PC 85
-E-
WATER ST
BRYANT & CLAUDIA BAKER
PC E PG 85
OB 870 PG 168
EXISTING
EXISTING
RIGHT -0T -KAY
t
2 m PROPOSED
BULKHEAD
EXISTING
BULKHEAD
BUFFER ZONE IIMPACTS
- 1,581 S.F. (0.036 A.C.)
BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS
- 609 S.F. (0.014 A.C.)
WAYNE VIEW INC.
08 HOBO PC 379 1-
\� E
TURBIDITY
CURTAW
PUNGO DISTRICT HOSPITAL
OB 645 PC 528 TOWN OF BELHAVEN
O8 IUT6 PC BBT EXISTING OB 1020 PG 437
DB XIT6 PG B04 BULKHEAD DIXON & HOYLE PARTNERSHIP
DB 1569 PO 646
— - — - - EXISTING FILL SLOPE LIMITS —'—" TURBIDITY CURTAIN
—E— EASEMENT BUFFER ZONE (IMPACTS BUFFER ZONE I
— — — PROPOSED SLOPE IMPACT LIMITS —BZ 2— BUFFER ZONE 2
PARTNERSHIP
—PDE— PERMANENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT111 --4H ill iki BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS —"-- TOP OF BANKS 643
PROPOSED SILT FENCE
� V
LEIGH ED ARD
4AI666RPG 661 Q¢2
4
.E.
WATER ST
UJUMA
Kimley-Horn TOWN OF BELHAVEN
�❑ and Associates, Inc. WATER STREET BUFFER SHEET
0''0" BRIDGE REPLACEMENT IMPACT I 3 OF 5
Port OHks Bor 3]068
Ral.iph, Nonh Carolirw 27636 JUNE 6 , 2 011
7a
0
Zr
LP "
EXISTING
BULKNEAB
G
TURBIDITY~CZ
CURTAIN
Z yj
PROPOSED
BULKHEAD
PROPOSED
WATERLINE
EXISTING
t iOUNDA7lON
PROPOSED
BULKHEAD
17ATERLKE
PROPOSED
BRIDGE
EXISTING
BRIDGE
o -
t
2 m PROPOSED
BULKHEAD
EXISTING
BULKHEAD
BUFFER ZONE IIMPACTS
- 1,581 S.F. (0.036 A.C.)
BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS
- 609 S.F. (0.014 A.C.)
WAYNE VIEW INC.
08 HOBO PC 379 1-
\� E
TURBIDITY
CURTAW
PUNGO DISTRICT HOSPITAL
OB 645 PC 528 TOWN OF BELHAVEN
O8 IUT6 PC BBT EXISTING OB 1020 PG 437
DB XIT6 PG B04 BULKHEAD DIXON & HOYLE PARTNERSHIP
DB 1569 PO 646
— - — - - EXISTING FILL SLOPE LIMITS —'—" TURBIDITY CURTAIN
—E— EASEMENT BUFFER ZONE (IMPACTS BUFFER ZONE I
— — — PROPOSED SLOPE IMPACT LIMITS —BZ 2— BUFFER ZONE 2
PARTNERSHIP
—PDE— PERMANENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT111 --4H ill iki BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS —"-- TOP OF BANKS 643
PROPOSED SILT FENCE
� V
LEIGH ED ARD
4AI666RPG 661 Q¢2
4
.E.
WATER ST
UJUMA
Kimley-Horn TOWN OF BELHAVEN
�❑ and Associates, Inc. WATER STREET BUFFER SHEET
0''0" BRIDGE REPLACEMENT IMPACT I 3 OF 5
Port OHks Bor 3]068
Ral.iph, Nonh Carolirw 27636 JUNE 6 , 2 011

TEMPORARY OPEN
WATER/AEC IMPACTS
GRAPHIC SCALE
p
- 1814 S.F. (0.042
A.C.)
25 0 25 50
PERMANENT OPEN
WATER/AEC IMPACTS
7
- 718 S.F. (0,016
A.C.)
(IN FEET)
2
IINCH = 50 FT
u pza
BULKHEAD
EXISTING
93
BULKHEAD
ED
BRYANT k CLAUDIA BAKER
PC E PG B5
G1 B
C
KNEAD
OB 870 PG 168 TURBIDITY
CURT AN
N 1-7i� Z
Z N
PROPOSED
BULKHEAD
OSED
BRYANT & CLAUDIA BAKER
DB 655 PG 536
PC E PG 85
PROPOSED
WATERLINE
EXISTING t. FOUNDATION
BULKHEAD
E
PROPOSED
WATERLPROPO—INE
BRIDGE
EXISTING
W TERLIN a
F ATION
WAYNE VIEW 3INC.
o Da Ioeo Pc 79 I.
N
Mu
LEIGHEDWARD
1666 PG 661 Q
BRIDGE
�
9
�E `•
E -,�
E
WATER ST
WATER ST
SLAB AN H
xA
�
EJ
EXIS794G
E PROPOSED
ROAD
RIGHT-OF-WAY
EXISTING
ROAD
\
_
L ZRALPH
PROPOSED
BULKHEAD
PROPOSED
BULKHEAD
W.HO
DB 833 PG
DB 60T PG
EXISTING
BULKHEAD
TURBIDITY
CURTAIN
PUNGO DISTRICT HOSPITAL
08 695 PG 5Z8
DB 10755 PG 687
TOWN OF BELHA.
EXISTING OB 1120 PG 437
D0 IOT6 PG Bea
BULKHEAD DIXON 6 HOYLE PARTNERSHIP
DB 1569 PG 648
— — - EXISTING FILL SLOPE LIMITS
�'— TURBIDITY CURTAIN
—E— EASEMENT
TEMPORARY
OPEN BUFFER ZONE I
WATER/AEC
IMPACTS —°Z7— BUFFER ZONE 2
— — — PROPOSED SLOPE
IMPACT LIMITS
PERMANENT
OPEN TOP OF BANKS
PARTNERSHIP
648
—PDE— PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
WATER/AEC
IMPACTS PROPOSED SILT
FENCE
Kimley-Horn
�❑ and Associates, Inc.
TOWN OF BELHAVEN
WATER STREET
OPEN WATER
SHEET
IMPACT 1
4 OF
Pa,1D/HX°90+33068BRIDGE
REPLACEMENT
5
RolMph, NwM C—Im. 27636
JUNE 6, 2011

GRAPHIC SCALE
125 0 12.5 25
(IN FEET)
/INCH = 50 FT
END BRIDGE
C,
pp
m —L STA 12+80.50
N
N
m
m
ELEV 7.63'
N
Tit E
UALI :
Pl = 12+50.00
-L STA 13 03.47 =
BEGIN BRIDGE
EL = 8.41'
-V2- STA 11 + 19.65
Pl = 11150,00
—L— STA 12+29.00 VC = l00'
E EV
= 7.20'
EL = 5.52'
ELE 7.59'
= l9
VC = 50'
K=69
PROPOSED
GR E
(+)2j77.—
m
PROPOSED
N
END BENTS 1
PROPOSED
ULKHEA�
EXISTING
- - -
EXISTING
BULKHEAD
BULKHEAD
I I
MHW = 0.43'
NORMAL W.S.EL. = -0.11'
MTL = -0.17'
c EXISTING BRIDGE
(MARCH 10. 2010)
MLW
= -0.77'
Kimley-Horn
❑ ❑ and Associates, Inc,
TOWN OF
WATER
BELHAVEN
STREETSHEET
PROFILE
IMPACT I
�"0"
Po.l OHk. Boa 3J060
Bol.i.h, Nm h C—li- 27636
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
JUNE 6, 2011
5 OF 5

Agent Authorization Form

Tobin of
3ktbabrn
In
Bapor Sown Council
Adam V. ®'Rzeal "'; - — S+1(Ree (11ac) Pigott, 3r., J1111por 3pro-Zero
Tobin Amager &M ibliglj 1699 �itebe "V. Caraluan
Dr. Ottitnt 10erett T. RE19011 Oup
Town Clerk �)otuarb D. Moore
Marieaant�, c�Ski� Letter of AuthorizationtoGertL. �tatclep
Dr. Quinn Leverett (Town Manager), with the Town of Belhaven authorizes
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to act as our limited agent to coordinate with
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Quality
and Division of Coastal Management for the preparation and submittal of
jurisdictional determinations and 404/401 and CAMA permits applications
associated with the replacement of Bridge No. 324 (Water Street bridge) located
in Beaufort County, North Carolina. Authorization will terminate on either final
agency action or upon written notification from either parties involved.
Company Name: Ki.mlev-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Contact Name: Beth Reed
Client Address: Town of Belhaven
P.O. Box 220
Belhaven, NC 27810:
Client Phone #: [phone]
Client Fax #: �� 52 �Z y j 5 %
Client Email: townmanaaaernu,belhavennc.us
(Signature of Q4,111)
Date
Vigit Our Veb!Me
bttp://WWbi.bPIbabennr.uq
Vogt Offire fox 220, jBrlbaben, 9- ortb Carolina 27S10 • [phone] • J'ax [phone]

Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination Request Form

ATTACHMENT
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Dr. Guinn Leverett, Town Manager
Town of Belhaven
P.O. Box 220
Belhaven, NC 27810
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES
AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State:NC County/parish/borough: Beaufort City: Belhaven
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.53773°
N, Long. -76.62235'W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody:Wynn's Gut, UT to Pantego Creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non -wetland waters: 100 linear feet: 40 width (ft) and/or 0.76 acres.
Cowardin Class: Riverine
Stream Flow:
Wetlands: acres.
Cowardin Class:
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters: NA
Tidal:
Non -Tidal:
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s): July 22, 2010

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre -construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This preliminary JD finds that there "may be"waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
2

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply
- checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and
requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant:
❑ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
Belhaven, Created 1951, Photorevised 1974.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation:NRCS Beaufort County Soil Survey, 1995.
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
® FEMA/FIRM maps:Panel No. 3720760400J.
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum
of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):2009.
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
3
b, &&i l0 /a- l?
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

Site
number
Latitude
Longitude
Cowardin
Class
Estimated
amount of
aquatic
resource in
review area
Class of
aquatic
resource
1
35.53796
-76.62273
Riverine
0.76
non -section 10
— non -wetland

Categorical Exclusion Action
Classification Form
(Signed)

CATEGORICAL ExCLUSION ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
TIP Project No.
B-4500
State Contract No.
8501450
W.B.S. No.
33733.1.1
Federal Project No.
BRZ-0210(1
A. Prosect Description:
The purpose of this project is to replace Bridge No. 324, carrying Water Street over Wynn's Gut,
a tributary of Pantego Creek and the Pungo River, in Belhaven, Beaufort County. Bridge No. 324
is 52 feet long. The replacement structure will be a bridge 51.5 feet long. The current
bulkheads under the bridge are a part of the existing structure and will also be replaced. The
bridge will include two 11 -foot lanes, curb and gutter, and 5 -foot sidewalks on both sides. The
roadway grade of the new structure will be approximately the same as the existing structure,
varying one foot or less from the existing ground.
The approach roadway will extend approximately 100 feet from the west end of the new bridge
and 125 feet from the east end of the new bridge. The approaches will include a 24 -foot
pavement width providing two travel lanes no wider than 12 feet. Curb and gutter and five-
foot wide sidewalks will be provided on each side. The roadway is a local collector and will be
designed with a 25 mile per hour design speed.
Figures 1, 2, and 3 include study area mapping and project photos. Traffic will be detoured off-
site during construction.
B. Purpose and Need:
NCDOT Bridge Management Unit records indicate Bridge No. 324 has a sufficiency rating of 22.6
out of a possible 100 for a new structure. The posted weight limit on the bridge is down to 8
tons for single vehicles and 14 tons for truck -tractor semi -trailers. The bridge is considered
structurally deficient. It has a structure condition appraisal of 2 out of 9 (Item 67 on the Bridge
Inspection Report). According to Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) standards, the bridge
is eligible for FHWA's Highway Bridge Program.
The superstructure of Bridge No. 324 is made of a reinforced concrete floor on timber joists and
steel I -beams. The substructure consists of timber caps on timber piles. Timber components
have a typical life expectancy between 40 to 50 years due to the natural deterioration rate of
wood. Rehabilitation of a timber structure is generally practical only when a few elements are
damaged or prematurely deteriorated. However, past a certain degree of deterioration, most
timber elements become impractical to maintain and upon eligibility are programmed for
replacement. Structural components of bridge No. 324 are experiencing an increasing degree
of deterioration that can no longer be addressed by reasonable maintenance activities, and the
bridge is approaching the end of its useful life.

C. Proposed Improvements:
Circle one or more of the following Type II improvements which apply to the project:
1. Modernization of a highway by resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation, reconstruction,
adding shoulders, or adding auxiliary lanes (e.g., parking, weaving, turning, climbing).
a. Restoring, Resurfacing, Rehabilitating, and Reconstructing pavement (311 and 4R
improvements)
b. Widening roadway and shoulders without adding through lanes
C. Modernizing gore treatments
d. Constructing lane improvements (merge, auxiliary, and turn lanes)
e. Adding shoulder drains
f. Replacing and rehabilitating culverts, inlets, and drainage pipes, including safety
treatments
g. Providing driveway pipes
h. Performing minor bridge widening (less than one through lane)
L Slide Stabilization
j. Structural BMP's for water quality improvement
2. Highway safety or traffic operations improvement projects including the installation of
ramp metering control devices and lighting.
a. Installing ramp metering devices
b. Installing lights
C. Adding or upgrading guardrail
d. Installing safety barriers including Jersey type barriers and pier protection
e. Installing or replacing impact attenuators
f. Upgrading medians including adding or upgrading median barriers
g. Improving intersections including relocation and/or realignment
h. Making minor roadway realignment
L Channelizing traffic
j. Performing clear zone safety improvements including removing hazards and
flattening slopes
k. Implementing traffic aid systems, signals, and motorist aid
I. Installing bridge safety hardware including bridge rail retrofit
3. Bridge rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement or the construction of grade
separation to replace existing at -grade railroad crossings.
a. Rehabilitating, reconstructing, or replacing bridge approach slabs
b. Rehabilitating or replacing bridge decks
C. Rehabilitating bridges including painting (no red lead paint), scour repair, fender
systems, and minor structural improvements
0
Replacing a bridge (structure and/or fill)

4. Transportation corridor fringe parking facilities.
5. Construction of new truck weigh stations or rest areas.
6. Approvals for disposal of excess right-of-way or for joint or limited use of right-of-way,
where the proposed use does not have significant adverse impacts.
7. Approvals for changes in access control.
8. Construction of new bus storage and maintenance facilities in areas used predominantly
for industrial or transportation purposes where such construction is not inconsistent
with existing zoning and located on or near a street with adequate capacity to handle
anticipated bus and support vehicle traffic.
9. Rehabilitation or reconstruction of existing rail and bus buildings and ancillary facilities
where only minor amounts of additional land are required and there is not a substantial
increase in the number of users.
10. Construction of bus transfer facilities (an open area consisting of passenger shelters,
boarding areas, kiosks and related street improvements) when located in a commercial
area or other high activity center in which there is adequate street capacity for
projected bus traffic.
11. Construction of rail storage and maintenance facilities in areas used predominantly for
industrial or transportation purposes where such construction is not inconsistent with
existing zoning and where there is no significant noise impact on the surrounding
community.
12. Acquisition of land for hardship or protective purposes, advance land acquisition loans
under section 3(b) of the UMT Act. Hardship and protective buying will be permitted
only for a particular parcel or a limited number of parcels. These types of land
acquisition qualify for a CE only where the acquisition will not limit the evaluation of
alternatives, including shifts in alignment for planned construction projects, which may
be required in the NEPA process. No project development on such land may proceed
until the NEPA process has been completed.
13. Acquisition and construction of wetland, stream and endangered species mitigation
sites.
14. Remedial activities involving the removal, treatment or monitoring of soil or
groundwater contamination pursuant to state or federal remediation guidelines.
D. Special Project Information:
The estimated costs, based on the 2009-2015 STIP, are as follows:
Prior Year's Cost $120,000
Right of Way $50,000
Construction $500,000
Total $670,000

Estimated Traffic:
Current - <400 vpd
Year 2030 - <400 vpd
Estimated TTST/Dual: 7%
Design Exceptions: There are no anticipated design exceptions for this project.
Bicycle Designation: This portion of Water Street is not a part of a designated bicycle route nor
is it listed in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) as a bicycle project.
Bridge Demolition: Bridge No. 324 is constructed of timber and steel and should be possible to
remove with no resulting debris in the water based on standard demolition practices.
Alternatives Discussion:
No Build — The no build alternative would result in eventually closing the road which is
unacceptable given the Town of Belhaven's commitment to maintain the bridge and preserve
the connectivity along Water Street.
Rehabilitation — The bridge was constructed in 1940, and the timber materials within the
bridge are reaching the end of their useful life. Rehabilitation would require replacing the
timber components which would constitute effectively replacing the bridge.
Offsite Detour — Bridge No. 324 will be replaced on the existing alignment. Traffic will be
detoured offsite (see Figure 2) during the construction period. NCDOT Guidelines for Evaluation
of Offsite Detours for Bridge Replacement Projects considers multiple project variables
beginning with the additional time traveled by the average road user resulting from the offsite
detour. The offsite detour for this project would include Pamlico Street, Main Street, and Allen
Road. The majority of traffic on the road is through traffic. The detour for the average road
user would result in two minutes or less of additional travel time (0.3 miles additional travel). A
9 to 12 -month duration of construction is expected on this project.
Based on the Guidelines, the criteria above indicate that on the basis of delay alone the detour
is acceptable. A representative of Pungo District Hospital (located adjacent to the bridge on the
west side) attended the Citizens Informational Workshop (described below/next page) and
indicated that the detour is acceptable. The hospital's emergency room entrance is located on
the west side of the hospital near Allen Street, and emergency responders arriving from areas
east of Belhaven primarily use Main Street and Allen Street.
Onsite Detour — An onsite detour was not evaluated due to the presence of an acceptable
offsite detour.
OCT 15 2012

Staged Construction — Staged construction would require a temporary bridge beside the
existing roadway alignment, an additional cost for the temporary bridge, and extra right of way.
The existing bridge is not wide enough to phase construction. This option was not considered
further since an acceptable offsite detour is available.
New Alignment — Given that the alignment for Water Street is acceptable, a new alignment was
not considered as an alternative.
Natural Resources:
An Environmental Screening Report was prepared in April 2010. Field investigations by Kimley-
Horn and Associates, Inc. (KHA) staff were conducted on December 4, 2009.
Wetlands — Field investigations by KHA staff determined that no wetland areas are located
within the project study area.
Public Involvement:
A Citizens Informational Workshop was held on Tuesday, February 23, 2010 at the Belhaven
Town Hall. Eleven citizens attended, and two comment sheets were received. Adjoining
property owners requested that the navigable waterway remain high/wide enough for existing
boat traffic to continue use after the bridge is replaced. The second written comment received
expressed concern over frequent flooding in Belhaven, suggesting flood gates under this bridge.
Permits:
The US Coast Guard is responsible for administering Section 9 of the Rivers and Harbors Act. A
Section 9 permit is required for construction or modification of all bridges spanning navigable
waters. In lieu of the Coast Guard Bridge Permit, an Advance Approval (AA) process has been
established to reduce the permit burden for bridges over waterways in which only small craft
navigate and that typically have no adverse effects on the environment. Based upon
correspondence with the Coast Guard and NCDOT Natural Environment Unit staff, it is
anticipated that this project will follow the AA process.
Other Agency Comments:
The North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission (NCWRC) provided a project -specific
comment that the area around B-4500 is characterized by higher salinity water primarily
supporting species under the jurisdiction of the NC Division of Marine Fisheries (NCDMF).
Coordination should be initiated with NCDMF to address impacts to aquatic species. NCWRC
recommends replacing this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply. According
to subsequent correspondence with NCDMF and NCWRC (documented in the Environmental
Screening Report, April 2010), the project study area is not designated as anadromous fish
spawning habitat or a primary nursery area.

The NCDENR Division of Water Quality (NCDENR-DWQ) provided the following project -specific
comments:
- Wynn's Gut is classified as an SC, NSW stream and is listed on the current 303(d) list for
Chlorophyll a.
- Pantego Creek and associated tributaries, including Wynn's Gut, are class SC, NSW
waters of the State. NCDWQ is very concerned with sediment and erosion impacts that
could result from this project. The NCDWQ recommends that highly protective
sediment and erosion control BMPs be implemented to reduce the risk of nutrient
runoff to Wynn's Gut. The NCDWQ requests that road design plans provide treatment
of the storm water runoff through best management practices as detailed in the most
recent version of NCDWQ's Stormwater Best Management Practices.
- This project is within the Tar -Pamlico River Basin. Riparian buffer impacts shall be
avoided and minimized to the greatest extent possible pursuant to 15A NCAC 26.0259.
Copies of all letters received in response to the Scoping Letter (November 2009) are attached.
E. Threshold Criteria
The following evaluation of threshold criteria must be completed for Type II actions
ECOLOGICAL
(4) If the project involves wetlands, is the amount of
permanent and/or temporary wetland taking less than
one-tenth (1/10) of an acre and have all practicable measures ❑
to avoid and minimize wetland takings been evaluated? N/A
(5) Will the project require the use of U. S. Forest Service lands? ❑
X
(6) Will the quality of adjacent water resources be adversely
impacted by proposed construction activities? X
(7) Does the project involve waters classified as Outstanding
Water Resources (OWR) and/or High Quality Waters (HQW)? F X
YES NO
(1) Will the project have a substantial impact on any
unique or important natural resource?
X
(2) Does the project involve habitat where federally
Fx1
listed endangered or threatened species may occur?
(3) Will the project affect anadromous fish?
❑
X
(4) If the project involves wetlands, is the amount of
permanent and/or temporary wetland taking less than
one-tenth (1/10) of an acre and have all practicable measures ❑
to avoid and minimize wetland takings been evaluated? N/A
(5) Will the project require the use of U. S. Forest Service lands? ❑
X
(6) Will the quality of adjacent water resources be adversely
impacted by proposed construction activities? X
(7) Does the project involve waters classified as Outstanding
Water Resources (OWR) and/or High Quality Waters (HQW)? F X

(8) Will the project require fill in waters of the United States
in any of the designated mountain trout counties? X
(9) Does the project involve any known underground storage
tanks (UST's) or hazardous materials sites? X
PERMITS AND COORDINATION
YES NO
(10) If the project is located within a CAMA county, will the
project significantlyaffect the coastal zone and/or any
"Area of Environmental Concern" (AEC)? X*
(11) Does the project involve Coastal Barrier Resources Act
resources? X
(12) Will a U. S. Coast Guard permit be required?
X
(13) Could the project result in the modification of any existing
regulatory floodway? X
(14) Will the project require any stream relocations or channel
changes? X
SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
YES
NO
(15)
Will the project induce substantial impacts to planned
growth or land use for the area?
X
(16)
Will the project require the relocation of any family or
business?
X
(17)
Will the project have a disproportionately high and adverse
human health and environmental effect on any minority or
low-income population?
X
(18)
If the project involves the acquisition of right of way, is the
amount of right of way acquisition considered minor?
X
❑
(19)
Will the project involve any changes in access control?
❑
X
(20)
Will the project substantially alter the usefulness
and/or land use of adjacent property?
X

SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND CULTURAL RESOURCES (Continued)
YES NO
(21) Will the project have an adverse effect on permanent
local traffic patterns or community cohesiveness? X
(22) Is the project included in an approved thoroughfare plan
and/or Transportation Improvement Program (and is,
therefore, in conformance with the Clean Air Act of 1990)? X
(23) Is the project anticipated to cause an increase in traffic
volumes? X
(24) Will traffic be maintained during construction using existing
roads, staged construction, or on-site detours? X
(25) If the project is a bridge replacement project, will the bridge
be replaced at its existing location (along the existing facility)
and will all construction proposed in association with the
bridge replacement project be contained on the existing X
facility?
(26) Is there substantial controversy on social, economic, or
environmental grounds concerning the project? X
(27) Is the project consistent with all Federal, State, and local laws a
relating to the environmental aspects of the project? X
(28) Will the project have an "effect" on structures/properties
eligible for or listed on the National Register of Historic Places? X
(29) Will the project affect any archaeological remains which are
important to history or pre -history? X
(30) Will the project require the use of Section 4(f) resources
(public parks, recreation lands, wildlife and waterfowl refuges,
historic sites, or historic bridges, as defined in Section 4(f)
of the U. S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966)? X
(31) Will the project result in any conversion of assisted public
recreation sites or facilities to non -recreation uses, as defined
by Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Act
of 1965, as amended? X
(32) Will the project involve construction in, across, or adjacent
to a river designated as a component of or proposed for
inclusion in the National System of Wild and Scenic Rivers? X

F. Additional Documentation Required for Unfavorable Responses in Part E
Response to Question 2: Manatees are considered seasonal inhabitants of North Carolina
typically occurring in June through October. This species inhabits a
variety of habitats including shallow coastal bays, lagoons, estuaries,
and inland rivers of varying salinity. Manatees typically inhabit
waters with depths ranging from 1.5 to 6 meters (about 5 to 20 feet).
Although water depths within the project study area are marginally
sufficient for manatee (the average water depth at the bridge is
approximately 3.3 feet and transitions to 5.3 feet about 100 feet
downstream of the bridge), according to the US Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS), Wynn's Gut would be considered suitable habitat
for manatee. The USFWS has prepared precautionary measures for
construction activities in waters used by manatee (Guidelines for
Avoiding Impacts to the West Indian Manatee, June 2003). According
to USFWS, if these guidelines are implemented by the contractor
during construction, the project should not have an adverse impact to
manatee. Correspondence with USFWS indicating concurrence with a
Biological Conclusion of No Effect and the above referenced
document are attached.
* Clarification for Question 10: The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources — Division of Coastal Management (NCDENR-DCM)
commented that it "appears that Public Trust Area and Public Trust
Shoreline Areas of Environmental Concern (AECs) will be impacted
and a Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) permit will be required."
It is anticipated that the proposed bridge replacement will qualify for
authorization under a CAMA General Permit with no significant
effects to any AEC.
Response to Questions 28 / 30: Bridge No. 324 is located on the edge of the Belhaven Historic
District, a property eligible for listing in the National Register of
Historic Places. Through coordination with the State Historic
Preservation Office (HPO) and Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA), FHWA intends to make a de minimis ruling based on the HPO
concurrence that this project will have "no adverse effect" on the
Belhaven Historic District. HPO has concurred with this finding and
issued a "no adverse effect" call based on the use of the Texas Classic
rail and 8 -inch non -mountable curb along the bridge.
Correspondence and a drawing/plan sheet are attached.

G. CE Approval
TIP Project No. B-4500 State Contract No. B501450
WBS No. 33733.1.1 Federal Project No. BRZ-0210(7)
Project Description:
The purpose of this project is to replace Bridge No. 324, carrying Water Street over Wynn's Gut,
a tributary of Pantego Creek and the Pungo River, in Belhaven, Beaufort County. Bridge No. 324
is 52 feet long. The replacement structure will be a bridge 51.5 feet long. The current
bulkheads under the bridge are a part of the existing structure and will also be replaced. The
bridge will include two 11 -foot lanes, curb and gutter, and 5 -foot sidewalks on both sides. The
roadway grade of the new structure will be approximately the same as the existing structure,
varying one foot or less from the existing ground.
The approach roadway will extend approximately 100 feet from the west end of the new bridge
and 125 feet from the east end of the new bridge. The approaches will include a 24 -foot
pavement width providing two travel lanes no wider than 12 feet. Curb and gutter and five-
foot wide sidewalks will be provided on each side. The roadway is a local collector and will be
designed with a 25 mile per hour design speed.
Categorical Exclusion Action Classification:
TYPE II(A)
Approved:
Date Mer dith H. Van Ddyn, P.E., Project
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
D to
Dirte
[h � /'/U
Date
ur. (jumn Leverett, Town Manager
Town of Belhaven, North Carolina
✓ TYPE II(B)
neer
William T. Goodwin, Jr.,-P.E., Bridge Project Development Engineer
North Carolina Department of Transportation
° John F. Sullivan, 111, P.E., Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration

TOWN OF BELHAVEN" 029144 ���
A SOUTHERN BANK AND TRUST COMPANY
PO Box 220, Belhaven, NC 27810-0220 ( BEL1AveN NORTH CAROLINA
E. �. � 66-258
252-943-3055 0� � —531
DATE CHECK NO. AMOUNT
j 07/10/2012 29144 *****800.00
n
r; Exactly Eight hundred and 00/100
THIS DISBURSEMENT HAS BEEN APPROVED AS REQUIRED BY
PAY, NC DENR-DIV Of COASTAL MANAGEMENT THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BUDGET AND CAL CONTROL ACT.
TO THE 943 WASHINGTON SQUARE 'MALL
ORDER WASHINGTON NC 27889
OF _ .___ ___ /L® __ NP
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
-ka Lcb--- -IVp
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
110029L4411' 1:053102586e:5L21LL58031"

A' N a
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Beverly Eaves Perdue Braxton C. Davis
Governor Director
November 8, 2012
Town of Belhaven
c/o Kimley-Horn & Associates
Beth Reed
P.O. Box 33068
Raleigh, N.C. 27636-3068
Dear Ms. Reed:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Attached is General Permit #57916 C to construct a 51.5'long X 39' wide bridge and associated infrastructure at
Bridge #324, on Water Street, Belhaven, North Carolina.
In order to validate this permit, please sign the permit as indicated. Retain the white copy for your files and
return the signed yellow and pink copies to us in the enclosed, self-addressed envelope. If the signed permit
copies are not returned to this office before the initiation of development, you will be working without
authorization and will be subject to a Notice of Violation and subsequent civil penalties.
We appreciate your early attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Stephen Lane
Coastal Management Representative
rcb
Enclosures
400 Commerce Ave., Morehead City, NC 28557
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
NorthCarolina

I
0
0
See
Sheet
I -A
For
Index of Sheets
See
Sheet
I -B
For
Conventional Plan Sheet Symbols
✓ A
�q
•0`w,
PROJECT
LOCAT/ON
TOWN OF
BELHAVEN
1
PUNGO RIVER
VICINITY MAP
TOWN OF BELHAVEN: DR. GUINN LEVERETT
[phone]
NCDOT CONTACT: MOHAMMED MAHJOUB, EI
[phone]
].708
PUNGO RNER
I
pr
F.'
d
♦.. = m & DETOUR
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA
ADT 2008 = < 400 VPD
20 10 0 20 40 ADT 2030 = < 400 VPD
DHV
ti -ft 1i
D=
PLANS
T=
20 10 0 20 40 V = 25 mph
I Ui&ftftj' I DESIGN EXCEPTION:
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) WA
4 2 0 4 8 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION:
LOCAL COLLECTOR
PROFILE (VERTICAL) (TTST + DUAL)
STATE OF NOIRkTH CAROLINA
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
BEA UFOR T COUNTY
STATE
STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET
NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
- ® aCa
B-4500
STATS PROJ. NO.
F.A. PROD. NO.
DESCRIPTION
33733.1.1
BRZ-0210(7)
P.E.
33733.2.1
BRZ-0210(7)
RNV & UTIL.
33733.3.1
BRZ-0210(7)
CONST.
LOCATION: BRIDGE NO. 324 OVER WYNN'S GUT ON WATER STREET �90'��,
TYPE OF WORK.- GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, AND STRUCTURE
".v g
TO US 264 BUS
-L- STA 11 + 15.00
BEGIN STATE
PROJECT B-4500
I
�1
WI
I W
J
WATER STREET -L-
-Y5- Sta. 10+ 11.21 I '44
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
PUNGO
DISTRICT -Y5- Sta. 11 +
HOSPITAL END CONSTR(
PROJECT LENGTH
WYNN'S GUT
1
BRIDGE
N0.324
4 ������;c .e �4�idi�fla y a� �� � i��n�•5 �r'k
r2_ _
BEGIN BRIDGE
-L- STA 12+29.00
END BRIDGE
-L- STA 12+80.
LENGTH OF ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4500 = 0.0,15 MILE
LENGTH OF STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-4500 = 10 MILE
TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT B-4500 = 0.055 P41L F_
WYNN'S
GUT LANE
-Y2-
TO PUNGO RIVER
-L.- '31Am 11#-rVa. vi
END STATE
PROJECT B-4500
0
W
+ V
Q
WATER STREET -L-
PLANS PREPARED FOR E—" Kimley-Horn
THE NCDOT BY: and Associates, Inc.
O. 2012 Post Office Box 33068
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636
PE NO. F-0102
2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
2011
LETTING DATE:
2012
CECIL NARRON, P.E.
PROJECT ENGINEER
MATTHEW WEST, P.E., AVS
M
TO RIVERVIEW STREET.,._
HYDRA ULICS ENGINEER
P.E.
SIGNATURE:
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
[Ills document,togother with the concepts and designs presented
herein, as an without written authorization and adaption by Kimley
Horn and Assoclates, Inc. shollbe without liability to. Klmley-Horn and
Associates, Inc. for which It was prepared. Reuse of and Improper
rellanc8 on this document Instrument of service, Is Intended only
for the specific purpose and client.
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER I /
P.E. P.E.
SIGMA ItE: j STATE HIGHWAY DESIGN ENGINEER

SKETCH OF BRIDGE IN RELATIONSHIP Tn PAVFMFNT
UMO'Z (HH SPIKE IN BASE OF 18' OAK)
N. -i659-305.335 E: 2707242.447
E EV. 3.49'
i STA 10+97.44 (OFF 131.95' LT.)
POT Sto. /0 +00.00
TL=_S-TA 11+15DO
TIE Tp EXISTING
-Y5-
P1 Sto 10+11.17
A=
43' 22' 501' (LT)
D
= 28628' 44D*
L =
150'
T
= 7.96'
R
= 20.00'
WYNN'S GUT
BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA
TlDAUY-hVFWENCEDca4SrAL
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE > 600 CFS
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION 3.70 FT
GUlVG.3lUt_WALA (LTJ
-L-;C 11+15.00
SAI AND TIE
XJ�A'N'
7- -EXI NG CURB (LT)
RETAIN EXISTING FENCE
Zl
E CONTRACTOR TO COORDi TE PROPOSED WATER LINE
T RELOCATION OF GUYWIRE
15, (SEE SHEET UC
BEGIN STATE PROJEC117, -4500 -L- STA 12+15.51
loV, CONSTRUCTIO BRYANT & CLAUDIA BAKER TIE PROPOSED
BULKHEAD INTO
IN GRA& PC E PG 85
DB STO PG 168 EXISTING (LT) Gi
EXISTING PA T
/SEk DETAIL W11 SHEET 2AI' Ri-MOVE AND DISPOSE EX/Shk
At i!F FENCE (APPROX. 80 LF) PROPOSED 25 LF.
I&
VEM%
biEPESTRIAN RAIL
o, ER
0LANE 25' LANE TAPER
f j %
I BRYANT & CLAUDIA BAKER rn
kn LO
DB 655 PC 636
PC E PG 85 _j
To
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
Q-Ac;nn I A
-Y2-
RM/ SHEET NO.
PI Sto 10+43B7
ROADWAY DESIGN
HYDRAULICS
A = 27* 5638.0' (LT)
ENGINEER
ENGINEER
D = 57* 17'44B*
Kimley-Horn
III 1/ 4
L 48.77'
and Associates, Inc.
CA.. A
\\�\\l
A
T = 24.88' �° QoF yam';
_Z1
R = 100.00' P.O. BOX 33068 S EAL
e = NC RALEIGH, N.C. 27636-3068
02 8 026480
0'.
S Q6"/46'50'E
PE NO. F -0102 /Z
RIGHT-OF-WAY REV.
Pp S 36* 03' 32.8" WCONST. REV. AN
PC Sto. 10+18.79 SEE SHEET NO. 5 FOR -L- PROFILE
Ile_
SEE SHEET NO. 5 FOR -�,2- PROFILE
SEE SHEET NO. 5- F,"$OFILE
-Y2- Sta, 10+3LOO SEE CROSS SECTIONS FOR -jY2- CROSS SLOPE TRANSITION TO -L-
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION SEE CROSS SECTIONS FOR -V.5- CROSS SLOPE'TRANSITIONS
BEGIN GRADE J, SEE SHEETS NO. Sl THRU Sli FOR STRUCTURE PLANS
MILL EXISTING PAVEMENT SEE SHEET NO. UCI FOR U#LITY CoNmuc-rfON PLAN
SEE EROSION CONTROL. PLANS FOR INFILTRAVON BASIN
I
FOR TIE IN 0 0"I' DESIGN AND Ll"TS OF DISTURBANCE
SEE DETAIL Wl SHEET 2A GUINN 0. LEVERETT
-Y2- STA /0+35 (OR CLOSEST DB 1181 PG 743
EXIST POST) TO STA 10+80.90 POT to. ll/�+00-00
REMOVE 53 LF EXISTING FENCE
AND PLACE 47 LF WOODEN FENCE
SEE DETAIL ISHEET 2D
-L- STA 12+60.50
TIE PROPOSED BULKHEAD
INTO EXISTING (LT)
1As.1)5,00
-Y2- STA 10+47J5
BEGIN CURB (LT) END STATE PROJECT -4$00
MGN PT Sto. 10+67.56 END CONSTRUCTION
END GRADE
Y2 STA 10+85.39It
MILL EXISTING 'PA -VEA
END CONCSIDEWALK (RT)
-Y2- STA10+8539 END CURB (RT) FOR TIE IN
SEE DETAIL 3 SHEET 2D SEE DETAIL W SHEET 2A
SAWCUT EXISTING PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY
TO REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE AND
PLACE ASPHALT PATCH. SEE DETAIL 5 SHEET 2D
1*8w-W
NI 1 9'0 2 lq p
. . ... . ..................... .
I
-L- STA 13+04.75 00
A
SAWCUT AND TIE TO EXISTING
CONC. SIDEWALK (LT)
-L- STA 13+1425 co
SAWCUT AND TIE I k..
TO EXISTING CURB (LT) x
WAYNE VIEW INC. I
DB 1080 PG 379
MILL EXISTING PAVEMENT tell
2y SW T)WEf� TIE TO XISTING CURB
+73 ke 64' OOD FENC:L
i AIL W3 SHEET 20) fl,
CLEAN OUT AND RETAIN
(Jj\ if;EXISTING DI AND SYSTEM 5 YO
+07B8
14'
L -:''POT "t000
V Y/ - i POT Sta. 11+27D6L--.--. VAI -Ji NOf
4 1f 1 11
CZ 87"45'09.Y 3 TEps FOUND IN
r -lb FIELD
'EAT S�! SEAT
E N -Si
CONC
4r CUHB
o IF 12, 13, 1
WATER �T
WV!f)TH J,-' Ir
INV. IA rl
ILIL I
it
TOP=1`4' iVAT L. -R ST. VA
S 46* 381 34T EN • , E ii
ii I.YA
"161.
(9 C
3ir ......... ..
W6 Ii
F.
......... S I Sit!
14 S
C cl,
.. ........
co
+76
DO NOT
OVER EX M#
CONC
0
-BL-5
ssm X\ MILi EXISTING PAVEME
(b -L - POT Sta. IO +90:00 G
u* TIE PROPOSED TO
DETAIL W1 Ffiii
47.W
-Y5 - POT Sto. /0 +00.00
GIN SLAB
A= 90'00' 00.0'
-L STA 12+15J
CA
S 43' 21' 26.56 W
I IS ORK
q) 1-10SPITAL. PC Sto.10+03.2/
ry) .-YS- Sta. 10+11.21 E01
L- �r.42+16.433
Q) BEGIN CONSTRUCTION /I
6VGIN
BEGIN GRADE B GIN (RT)
,SEE , ETAIL J SHEET - 2D
TIE PROPOSED DRIVE 3 ll
TO EXISTING PAVEMENT PUNGO DISTRICT HOSPITAL
OB 645 PG 528 (�EIbffl CONC.­
L- STA 12+2127
DQ 1076 PG 887 IDEwALk (RT)
DB 1076 PG 884 -L- STA i'2+6222
TIE PROPOSED
BEGIN BRIDGE BULKHEAD INTO
EXISTING (RT)
PT Sto. /0 -L- STA 12+29.00
Pf?npnqFn 'in
PEDESTRIAN RAIL
_y5_ Sta. -, 1. 1 + 01-32 -BL-3 -
END CONSTRUCTION INFILTRATION BASIN
END GRADE SEE ERO-ITHRU ERO-7
TIE PROPOSED DRIVE
TO EXISTING PAVEMENT
POT Sta. 11+12.37
1 Mirr_l� 1 T LINt:
FOLLOWS BUCKI-1EAD
OF IMNS'S G(Tr
C,
jr
co
't ­
t4
EY LANE T
-L- STA /2+90.
TIE PROPOSED
BULKHEAD INTO
EXISTING (RT)
LEIGH EDWARD I 1 �' ?� .� ' !
PAT �814
>
rT
IDE(.'K DB 166P 661 15; ALI(
+7J
C`0
jr 7�R :'t! VAIR
Irov-
INVAIJIT=0.69'
2r
>
WATER ST
o _q�?S 46- 38,3,3.5- E
S
Top.%:3.89'
INV. IN=-0.1I'(NW)
.. . ........
GLIY :,p
"ISTING R/W pp pp
SIGN
;>
LD
LO
ti
F
F & 28,
39'
t tY
to
CD
50'LANE TAPER
u.�
IAA
-L- STA13+18D0
END CURB (RT) '-GPS RALPH W.HODGES SEE DETAIL 3 SHEET 2D DB 833 PG 826
-L- STA /3+/8.00 08 607 PG 314
END CONC. SIDEWALK (RT) z
PROPOSED 25 LF. 1- POT Sto.15 +1.3.54
PEDESTRIAN RAIL -Y3- POT Sta. 11 +1.3.61
&F 9t 26' 24Y t :X
aulTOWN OF BELHAVEN
DB 1020 PG 437
0. 1.3 +03.47 DIXON & HOYLE PARTNERSHIP
"
DB 1569 PG 648
_Y2- POT 4W9.65
N 46`11'12' IN
1� I T11
Z� = 54* 45** 28.Y %,
END APPROACH SLA,
-L- STA 12*94.68
REMOVE AND DISPOSE
PECK
SPIKEINBASi - OF
CONCRETE STEPS AND le TREE)
N: 658864D11 E.- 2707404.609
END BRIDGE i ELEV.4.97.
-L- STA 12+80.50 OUT OF PROJECT LIMITS
FROPERTY LINE t DIST FROM -L- STA 15 1354 = 77.74'
BEARING = S JSV`2927114(
FOLLOWS 13LJ(XHEAI'_lI
01" 'vi'YNNS'S GL17
Lu DIXON & HOYLE PARTNERSHIP
r DB 1569 PG 648
WYNN'S GUT 0i