52629_NOE, MARION_20080929

�o - ► -vim ���
❑°LAMA / ❑ DREDGE & FILL
GENERAL PERMIT
Previous permit #
[]New ❑Modification ❑Complete Reissue
[]Partial Reissue Date previous permit issued
As authorized by the State of North Carolina, Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental
concern pursuant to I SA NCAC
U pLules attached.
Applicant Name r ! (
Project Location: County,
Address
Street Address/11Staiite Road/ Lot #(s)
City_ State ZIP
- LJ j ! I` j
Phone # Fax # O
Subdivision
Authorized Agent
ty - iC � � % � "- -- .��
City -I
`(
CW .EW J 3WTA ES PTS
El[I❑
Phone # ) River Basin
Affected
❑ OEA ElHHF ❑ IH ❑ UBA Cl N/A
-{
Wtr. Body
I �«
'� �� (nat /man /unknEJ )
AEC(s):
- t
PWS: OFAdj.
/
Closest Maj. Wtr. Body
ORW: yes / no PNA yes 1 no Crit.Hab.
yes / no
Type of Project/ Activity
Pier (dock) length
Platform(s)
Finger pier(s)_
Groin length
number--
Bulkhead/ Riprap length
avg distance offshore
max distance offshore
Basin, channel
cubic yards
Boat ramp
Beach Bulldozi
Other
i i_
� f
s;
Shoreline Length �~
SAV: not sure yesCn
Sandbags: not sure yes rnnMoratorium: n/a yesPhotos: yesWaiver Attached: yes . -----
A building permit may be required by:
Notes/ Special Conditions
A. / +L, �t G(Al
dot
Agent or Applicant Printed Name
Signature ** Please read compliance statement on back of permit
(Scale: ( )
❑ See note on back regarding River Basin rules.
PerinittVicer's Signa e
ApplicationFee(s) Check# Local Planning Jurisdiction

Statement of Compliance and Consistency
This permit is subject to compliance with this application, site drawing and attached general and specific conditions. Any
violation of these terms may subject the permittee to a fine or criminal or civil action; and may cause the permit to become
null and void.
This permit must be on the project site and accessible to the permit officer when the project is inspected for compliance. The
applicant certifies by signing this permit that 1) prior to undertaking any activities authorized by this permit, the applicant will
confer with appropriate local authorities to confirm that this project is consistent with the local land use plan and all local
ordinances, and 2) a written statement or certified mail return receipt has been obtained from the adjacent riparian
landowner(s) .
The State of North Carolina and the Division of Coastal Management, in issuing this permit under the best available
information and belief, certify that this project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal Management Program.
River Basin Rules Applicable To Your Project:
❑ Tar- Pamlico River Basin Buffer Rules ❑ Other:
❑ Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules
If indicated on front of permit, your project is subject to the Environmental Management Commission's Buffer Rules for the
River Basin checked above due to its location within that River Basin. These buffer rules are enforced by the NC Division of
Water Quality. Contact the Division of Water Quality at the Washington Regional Office (252-946-6481) or the Wilmington
Regional Office (910-796-7215) for more information on how to comply with these buffer rules.
Division of Coastal Management Offices
Raleigh Office Morehead City Headquarters
Mailing Address: 400 Commerce Ave
1638 Mail Service Center Morehead City, NC 28557
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638 252-808-2808/ 1-888-4RCOAST
Location: Fax: [phone]
2728 Capital Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
919-733-2293
Fax:[phone]
(Serves: Carteret, Craven, Onslow -above
New River Inlet- and Pamlico Counties)
Elizabeth City District
1367 U.S. 17 South
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
252-264-3901
Fax:[phone]
(Serves: Camden, Chowan, Currituck,
Dare, Gates, Pasquotank and Perquimans
Counties)
Washington District
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
252-946-6481
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Beaufort, Bertie, Hertford, Hyde,
Tyrrell and Washington Counties)
Wilmington District
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
910-796-7215
Fax:[phone]
(Serves: Brunswick, New Hanover,
Onslow -below New River Inlet- and
Pender Counties)
Revised 08/09/06

t
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATIONIWAIVER
FORM
Name of individual applying for the permit: maf� ter \, U
Address of property: )y 4 V V cL ('- r V� e w L" e,
(Lot or street#, street of road) J
Hao\LDS T5 la-r�OAV* f e+ in f
(City & County)
I hereby certify the I own property adjacent to the above referenced,property. The
Individual applying for this permit has described to me (as shown Ion fhe'atthed ��
drawing) the development they are proposing. A description or drawing
dimensions, should be provided whit this letter.
,
Pl have no objections to this proposal P
If you have objections to what is being proposed, please write the Divisiof Coastal
Management, 400 Commerce Ave., Morehead City, NC 28557 or call, "I
808-2808
within 10 days of receipt of the notice. No response is considered thsame as no
objection if you have been notified by Certified Mail.
Waiver Section
I understand that a pier, dock, mooring pilings, breakwater, boathouse, lift or
sandbags must be set back a minimum distance of 15' From my area of riparian
access unless waived by me. (If you wish to waive the setback, you must initial the
appropriate blank below.)
I do wish to waive the 15' setback requirement
I do not wish to waive the 15" setback requirements
,L,3 4 Ijq eN oaf e5 4)(�
aQ
e D to
�- /Uujooq /red
Priift Name
Telephone number with area code

CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION/WAIVER 6
FORM
Name of individual applying for the permit: tkc l7 r- 1 I �► �� =�a
Address of property: j Q `t V V e r ✓, e (A,)
(Lot or street#, street of road)
/\Ccs TS Ia-r + , Lw+ (e i-
(City & county)
I hereby certify the I own property adjacent to the above referenced property. The
individual applying for this permit has described to me (as shown on the attached
drawing) the development they are proposing. A description or drawing, with
dimensions, should be provided whit this letter.
_J
this propagal
If you have objections to what is being proposed, please write the Division of Coastal
Management, 400 Commerce Ave., Morehead City, NC 28557 or call [phone]
within 10 days of receipt of the notice. No response is considered the same as no
objection if you have been notified by Certified Mail.
Waiver Section
I understand that a pier, dock, mooring pilings, breakwater, boathouse, lift or
sandbags must be set back a minimum distance of 15' From my area of riparian
access unless waived by me. (If you wish to waive the setback, you must initial the
appropriate blank below.)
I do wish to waive the 15' setback requirement
—X- I do not wish to waive the 15" setback requirements
' oy�2
z
SignafuV Date
Print Name
7v y- 435---11 �
Telephone number with area code
2GU �

Page 1 of 1
Subj: Adjacent Riparian Property Owner Notification
Date: 8/22/2008 11:51:04 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time
From: HIConsultants
To: Heather.,M [e-mail]
We have received notice from Marion T. Noe of their plans to add a pier and driveway to a lot (104 W erview
Lane) adjacent to our house at 397 Oak Hammock Drive on Harkers Island. We lived at Oak Honmocull time
from 1981 to 2000 and still consider Harkers Island home although we currently live off and the-housia sjust a
part-time residents now. My point being we are not your average ding batter (although we do not deny,being
ding batters) as we are very familiar with this specific location and it's recent history. We built the first pier along
this shore. It is currently 245 feet long as I recall. At the time, shrimping was a still a major industry anchrimp
boats of all sizes would come out of Westmouth bay and cut down the shore just past the point-(EagleMock).
This kept a fairly substantial channel parallel to the shore at a point just a few feet from the `end of our. er. The
shrimpers used our property as a landmark know as the glass house.
We are not specifically concerned about the neighbor building a pier and boat lift. We are concerned about the
length of the pier. The document sent us leaves out a critical point as it does not really indicate exactly 350 feet
from where so it is unknown exactly how far out the pier would extend into the water bUt 350 feet is over a
r1Ui1dred feel longer then our pier. Ever, if the channel has shifted, we feel this is way tuo long to justify and may
impact access to our facilities as well as boat traffic.
We would be less likely to object to a pier which did not extend farther out into the water then our pier. We
would however object to any pier if it was constructed in the so called break -away type that are designed to
come apart in sections during hurricanes. At least two of our neighbors to the east have this type of pier and the
sections move down the shore not only reeking havoc with our pier and seawall, but with structures in our yard.
We have pictures made from the last storm before the neighbors collected their pier sections from our property
which clearly shows the damage these sections cause.
We are surprised CAMA regulations would allow a sand drive way over the marsh grass on that lot. That being
said we would not be opposed to our neighbor putting in a driveway of some sort so long as it does not cause
water to back up or stand on our property. Our well and well house is located on the west side of our lot. We do
not want our well contaminated. Unfortunately this lot is the lowest point along this part of the shore.
Historically, it has served as a natural conduit for excess rain, tides and storm wash between the Straits and the
tidal marsh. If the area had been properly managed during it's development, this lot would have never been
sold as a lot and should have been designated as a natural area for reasons I have just mentioned. Of course
that type of management or consideration didn't exist in the 70's and that is history but the facts and nature of
this property still remain the same regardless. Having said all that, I don't know what type of driveway could be
put in that would preserve the current natural storm/water recovery system the property serves and not cause
long term standing water to set on our property and endanger our well, but if such a driveway could be
constructed, we would have a hard time opposing it.
Mark and Rhoda StJohn
P.O. Box 118
Cherryviile, NC 28021
704-435-1187
hicons u_Itants aol.com
It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel deal here.
Friday, August 22, 2008 America Online: HIConsultants

) S� d
reach Sham 35v' pier
e cl , o- d ri arc.. 4 ' W e wa1 kv�s�y
n end, Lev -car\ °°`o-_
t, � -�i� -r ILL,
L- r } 1b T_ LA J�
we5
pa!('iart 11 ne , Z
- rprY� 2Qs'� pCL
CNb
V�
f3�J�nnj�
piciK
VI l w
`6
Sgrvt` &Bch
0000397

Subj: Adjacent Riparian Property Owner Notification
Date: 8/22/2008 11:51:04 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time
From: HIConsultants
To: [e-mail]
,,xOge I of I
Au G 2 5 Zoo$
moreh(,aaad City DCM
We have received notice from Marion T. Noe of their plans to add a pier and driveway to a lot (104 Waterview
Lane) adjacent to our house at 397 Oak Hammock Drive on Harkers Island. We lived at Oak Hammock full time
from 1981 to 2000 and still consider Harkers Island home although we currently live off and the house is just a
part-time residents now. My point being we are not your average ding batter (although we do not deny being
ding batters) as we are very familiar with this specific location and it's recent history. We built the first pier along
this shore. It is currently 245 feet long as I recall. At the time, shrimping was a still a major industry and shrimp
boats of all sizes would come out of Westmouth bay and cut down the shore just past the point (Eagle Rock).
This kept a fairly substantial channel parallel to the shore at a point just a few feet from the end of our pier. The
shrimpers used our property as a landmark know as the glass house.
We are not specifically concerned about the neighbor building a pier and boat lift. We are concerned about the
length of the pier. The document sent us leaves out a critical point as it does not really indicate exactly 350 feet
from where so it is unknown exactly how far out the pier would extend into the water but 350 feet is over a
hundred feet longer then our pier. Even if the channel has shifted, we feel this is way too long to justify and may
impact access to our facilities as well as boat traffic.
We would be less likely to object to a pier which did not extend farther out into the water then our pier. We
would however object to any pier if it was constructed in the so called break -away type that are designed to
come apart in sections during hurricanes. At least two of our neighbors to the east have this type of pier and the
sections move down the shore not only reeking havoc with our pier and seawall, but with structures in our yard.
We have pictures made from the last storm before the neighbors collected their pier sections from our property
which clearly shows the damage these sections cause.
We are surprised CAMA regulations would allow a sand drive way over the marsh grass on that lot. That being
said we would not be opposed to our neighbor putting in a driveway of some sort so long as it does not cause
water to back up or stand on our property. Our well and well house is located on the west side of our lot. We do
not want our well contaminated. Unfortunately this lot is the lowest point along this part of the shore.
Historically, it has served as a natural conduit for excess rain, tides and storm wash between the Straits and the
tidal marsh. If the area had been properly managed during it's development, this lot would have never been
sold as a lot and should have been designated as a natural area for reasons I have just mentioned. Of course
that type of management or consideration didn't exist in the 70's and that is history but the facts and nature of
this property still remain the same regardless. Having said all that, I don't know what type of driveway could be
put in that would preserve the current natural storm/water recovery system the property serves and not cause
long term standing water to set on our property and endanger our well, but if such a driveway could be
constructed, we would have a hard time opposing it.
Mark and Rhoda StJohn
o n Box 118
Cherryville, NC 28021
704-435-1187
hiconsuitants@aoi,.com
It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel deal here.
Friday, August 22, 2008 America Online: HIConsultants

CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED'
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATIONIWAIVER
FORM
Name of individual applying for the permit: ( t�l� 1 Q�
Address of property: Q e (( V-, e
(Lot or street#, street of road)
V\&� TS b-nd , OAC�c (el -
(City & County)
I hereby certify the I own property adjacent to the above referenced property. The
individual applying for this permit has des-.ribed to me (as shown on the attached
drawing) the development they are proposing. A description or drawing, with
dimensions, should be provided whit this letter.
If you have objections to what is being proposed, please write the Division of Coastal
Management, 400 Commerce Ave., Morehead City, NC 28557 or call [phone]
within 10 days of receipt of the notice. No response is considered the same as no
objection if you have been notified by Certified Mail.
Waiver Section
I understand that a pier, dock, mooring pilings, breakwater, boathouse, lift or
sandbags must be set back a minimum distance of 15' From my area of riparian
access unless waived by me. (If you wish to waive the setback, you must initial the
appropriate blank below.)
I do wish to waive the 15' setback requirement
I do not wish to waive the 15" setback
.20 reheaci City DGM
Signa r�?/' Date
Print Name
Telephone number with area code

DCM COMPLIANCE INSPECTION RECORD