21482_REI, NUNO_19990309

114
CAMA AND DREDGE AND FILL
GENERAL * 021482 - c
PERMIT �-
as authorized by the State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources and the Coastal Resources Commission
in an area of environmental concern pursuant to 15A NCAC
Applicant Name
Addrpc,
City
Project Location (County, State Road, Water Body, etc.)
of Project. Activity
PROJECT DESCRIPTION I SKETCH
Pier (dock) length
4 Lil
Groin length
number —
Bulkhead length
max. distance offshore
Basin, channel dimensions
cubic yards ate:: fit: Nk:e7i� t>�
4/�,kK ago► �
Boat ramp dimensions o" 5A?aw DA1� 3'�(qp ^
$( Si>I iTT f1t A A`x•:
Other �F1f�MT1t.1i.
This permit is subject to compliance with this application, site
drawing and attached general and specific conditions. Any
violation of these terms may subject the permittee to a fine,
imprisonment or civil action; and may cause the permit to be-
come null and void.
This permit must be on the project site and accessible to the
permit officer when the project is inspected for compliance.
j The applicant certifies by signing this permit that 1) this pro-
ject is consistent with the local land use plan and all local
ordinances, and 2) a written statement has been obtained from
adjacent riparian landowners certifying that they have no
objections to the proposed work.
In issuing this permit the State of North Carolina certifies that
this project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal
'i Management Program.
State
L
attachments
application fee
Phone Number
Zip
(SCALE:
2fT.XZ8 Fr. CAT -A
tINLiP- P�eR-
r
issuing date
a Lu
applicant's signature
permit officer's signature
expiration date

BROAD CREEK CONST INC. 4475
[phone] 66-152/531
�JJ 11 Creekview Court DATE ��
Merritt, NC 28556
PAY TO -)
THE ORD OF
DOLLARS � muaeo.
Wachovia flank, N.A.
B,ybo-, NC 28515
1�
nm
i:05310L5291: 0781 0012401" 4475
emw

I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to 1)120t2 R",If' is
(Name of Property Owner)
property located at C� p �, r ��>�> t 0 c, s
/ (Lot, Block, Road, etc.)
on �C cl �'cx�`�— lLi�: p-Pic , in _ (�i rr1. �/ c' L'l , N. C.
(Waterbody) (TewwonvP06k County)
He has described to me as shown below, the development he is proposing at that location,
and, I have no objections to his proposal.
DESCRIPTION AND/OR DRAWING OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
(To be fitted in by individual proposing development)
0 � l a C I�
n
0
'giI`( PdPp�
Print or Type Name Q
Z/ % ` (F
Telephone Number
Date: J — ()% 9 i

ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER STATEMENT
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to , L ` 's
(Name of Property Owner)
property located at
(Lot, Block, Road, etc.)
on %�h ,�� ��'v IC- , in Gly-z v? .+� , N.C.
(Waterbody) (Tow&aadfor County)
He has described to me as shown below, the development he is proposing at that location,
and, I have no objections to his proposal.
DESCRIPTION AND/OR DRAWING OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
(To be filled in by individual proposing development)
Ct #a��� Glrarvec��
i
��d
Signature
Print or Type Name
Telephone Number
Date: 3

BROAD CONSTRt"CTION
Eh
•
i
i
i
0
C:
316
r

I
-62*51
t .
8; —r 6
80_01)'
11,3 12'_1 ''_E 83 1,'i
' 1
C3
40. 43'
80 00'
t 11 W41 59 rV I -t C)U:
28`5 ," 18
LILJE---- -- BEARLINE I-ABLF--
ING [)IS1 AI';(;I
- - _-- - -
I 1 S21'55' 47 "E= I L'
--1_-22- ---S22.'13'29"W' _..._10._ 9,--
s
Q,
s&
S 'ojOOD JETTY
sCP
per,, ,1 i
�111/I i7I? in,,. 4141
<�
i 01P b�1UCHz. A )
i
T
q
j
EXIS LING
;— DOCK
i
r
LE GENDi I R /W = RIGHT OF \JAY
C{ = CENTER LINE
- - -� CI = CUR`✓E NUMBER
L.I = LINE NUMBER
101 - MINIMUM BUILDING I-INL.
DP Llt:- rQAINA(iE & U T IL I T `'
CAMA COASTAL: AREA .MANIC r-1,11111 A(,E.Hcy
SU.F T. - SQUARE r E:E I
• EXISTING IRON PIPE.
r`
E.X)S-fIN(,.(.jjj)Cpf.. E MC1fflJhl�_P1I
-'K. "^,1L
NON MONUMEN r -LU P01111
Y
w'
w
a
U
i--
0
n
I 1
C)
I
NORTH REFERENCE
PLAT CABINET G; SLIDE 16-G.
�NARY PLAT
00 i. i L,R I IE-00Rf4W]0N
GUi,l�y'F_`f ,l'JCL OF �F�I_E '
J
W
1k
A
ni
-J
PRELIMINARY PLOT PLAN FOR
K
NUN❑ M . REI & WIFE,
MARY JANE REI
NUMBER
FIVE TOWNSHIP, CRAVEN COUNTY, NOR1H CAROLINA
PROPER TY REFERENCE:
LOT 13, REMISED FINAL PLAN OF
THE -MOORINGS;' SECTION ONE
PLAT CABINET G, SLIDES 16--F & 16-G.
CRAVEN COUNTY REGISTER OF DEEDS
} S UITT & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
Land Surveyors - Land Planning
Environmental Planning - Computer graphics
P.O. Box 12034
New Berri NC 28562
Tel. [phone]
Fax: [phone]
DAM 03--30-1999 � � ., � � JOB NO. Cad1649,
GI�1�I HIC ��.AI�L
( IN PFF7 )
I inch 10 f!
teo

Date:
Tf). \'amt 11- 7 h 14
I (1corion: - �L �
Number of Pages j
(Including Cover Sheet)
Phone: J Q(� �' o�fJ Fax: 3 3 d
From. vame.-
Location: //-,- A ,/,
Subject1 .Memo;
/.t
C1 URGENT - Please hand deliver immediately (Including Copyholders below)
0 Please zopy anti distribuie io -
.L14i1 Deli1�1Z
Fax Transmittal Forma
A �9]

April 9, 1999
I& Al Padgca
112 Seattle Slew
H2velock, NC 23532
Mr. Dick Holbert
P.O. Boa 161
Havelock, NC 28532
Dear Al and Dick
I received the results of the land surrey on Lot I3 this week and have been working to determine the
mlatimships of my proposed dock to the existing docks- I have super imposed the riparian lines as
developed by CAMA on my latest survey map- The CAMA lines are based on the plan that Sciot2 Jones
and Ted T)rndall presented to us during m} March 8, 1999 visit to The Moorings_ As promised, I am
sending both of you the results. The oatcome is sorn„o-w at surprising. According to the new information. I
calculate that l.,ot 14 dock is M violation of the set back =Tiirement from the zipanan line by
apprommat,;.ty 24 feet. This putts the construciim approximately 9 feet over the riparian lute and puts the
dock design we came up Nvith in question_ I am afraid that my dock will be in gross violations of Dick's
riparian line.
One of the stapularion5 that I brad made during my last vises nas that the plan not violate any riparian lines
or set back,. Mary -lane and I are not comfortable with building the dock so that it violates the riparian line
or set back to atzy uureasonable extent. A verbal agrm rent made in goad faith today by both my neighbors
rimy not Bold up when the aaginai people _have moves on. We do not want to leave ourselves open to this
kind of situation. We bate made a very large investment in this property and naturally we want to protect
it_
Al, during my latest visit to The Moorings, you mentioned that you believed thaw: your dock was built inside
your riparian line set back by one foot- Illat means that you should hays expected your neighbor to build
his dock, A& on his 15 feet riparian line set back as well. In this case, the minirunrn distance _von could
expect between the dock construction would be about 31 fed. In view of the latest information" I am
proposing to build my dock 31 ]feet away from vom dock. Basically, this new plan follows closely to the
original permitted plan at the time of our purchase of the property. Regardless of anY proposed dcsigr4 it
should not be consmied as a giving up of rnu riparian rights.
The proposed plan to build our dock 31 fe`t from your dock would also call for me to be iu -violation of oar
riparian line set back on Dick's side (south side) by one to two feet; We can live Rith this if Dick can. In
this way, if Dick moves on and the new neiglibers have a problem with it, we could al=ys chop off one to
two feet at the end ofthe dock. We could also desip and buuld my dock with this scenario in nod_
Likewise, I would not expect Dick to give up his riparian rights either. I would only expect Dick to give us
permission to be slightly over the riparian Rae at one very specific part of the dock oonstructian, Future
construction on the dock would follow the riparian rules- In other words, any fa re construction on ;he
dock sections that are in violation would have to conform to the CAMA regulations and any violations
woYild have to be cleared unless permission is grallteti anew by the owner of the property that is being
infringed upon_
AL are believe that we are bed reasonable and generous in this sitmdoa if we were to exercise our
riparian rights and assuming my planing is correct, rhea the distances between the two docks would be
e.Y nely close. Essentially, You would have very limited access to the inside docks (See enclosure).
Clearly we do not want this to be the case- 'ants Mary -Jame and I also want to protect our inNvstinent at The
Moormvrs-

The new design will have the boathouse on the sov#h side. With the boatho= on the south side and the
fact that your dock wilt angle array fivm our dock, it should give you plentV of room to man ettvar your
boat EmzntWIY, the area for maneuvering should be well in eaoess of 31 feet_
I have enclosed a copy of the lot MrWy done by Suitt & Associates shMang the reladonship of Lot 13 to
Tots t2 and 14. I have shown the riparian Ike as established by CAMA and I have drawn what I propose is
the latent plan for conSOUCtIon Of my dock. Please examine it and cone back to me with comments Ibr
Consideratom 1 IMing my April 19, 1999 visit I will bring the acWal bineprim for more detailed
omminatiom
I hope that the latest plan will bc awWlable to all pasties utvolved and will not cause anyone any undue
hardship. Mary Jane and I value your i`iiendsNp and hope that the Latest developments do not jeopardize
our fiierAy remons.
Respectfully yams.
Ounond'wiar_v-Jane M
Enclosure

ADJACEAN
A4?
1 tl reby certify.��t j C1W41 Ur'T�e- aLt:, eri..'rJ C 41LK,f: �f pl'opert�; (���13c.,,
T II
,NeS
at Block, R� nail, etc.)
C-Av�te
F�rU _ ll ct,
onW -n an&/Or ColultY)
( 4r teCrlOtly) OI)OS1!• gg t t1
IX` }li".5 ��it✓5C: �t)E:�IC) �Pl� ^�t titter iS �jr
�Ilti, I1dVtW ii0 4)�]�Ct10C;9
DESCRi�''MN-�NT)+'QR i3:�.��'rri r 01" rpto1'osr' 3 I: ;�' , , 3ryRiF�,'
(gyp be fEleid in by, individa,71 roPusing rdt�V&.top:in r►.3'.
ti �0 Ll' 1t) A LK%-jR-1
i37t�� _ �,er
a,Jr~+ r��g�r ,�c-k
Yjet
CAI
-P "'O�q
Shang u:
.girt orType Puns:
Date: /

•
R; 76'
81).00' 113.)'1 2 1 ►: ' 9 i.•i3
(3._.. 1'1Y:
L I N E 1 13Lf.:
1111E ---HEAI�IfIG f?I`;l f,f,t;l
I1
2'13.29"VW 10. _'_9' .._.
i I
I
sV�
V.
0
f 'AID00 JE T T Y
EXIS TING
I)U'_­K
©l.JI_Kf-IEAU1
t W)UNIAL WAI
19.3.
b �c 4�
u
ti
I LEGEND:
R/W = RIGHT ❑F 4AY
= CENTER L.TNE
- I Cl = CURVE- NUMBER
L. i = I -ME NUMBER
i ► PI - MINIMUM BUl[. M-4(,
IJ(�LII DRAINA(:,E- & lJ T IL. T 1 `f 1.+;F:tAF Pl 1
C:A1.4A ti Cpa` TAL. f RLA ,I"IAf J:)I i'_ ►III I I1 :,( �F.1 1f' �.
,Alf T. - SOLIARE -"-E I-1
• = [.Xl','IIW5 TRON PIP['
t/ r'=� = I�t7N MCJNUME N Tf= U ►'Li i ld l
X
W'
W
L)
VIC;HITY MAP
j_.
1-40IRTI-i IREFERI NCE
PLAT CABINET G; SLIDF 16—G.
1JIM',HIMARY PLAT
C01. V E (t,I'dCL Uf I_E3
e
PRFLIMINARY PLOT PLAN FOR
b'NK NUNO M. REI & WIFE,
T p -�--
MARY JANE REI
r\1UNBc:fl rive TOWNSHIP, CRAVEN COUNTY, NOR1H CAROLIHA
PROPERTY REFERENCE:
L01 13, REVISED FINAL PLAN 01F
---- 1HE MOOfZINGS,' SECTION ONE
PLAT CABINET G, SLIDES 16--F & 16—G.
CRAVEN COUNTY REGISTER OF D_:EDS
SUITT & ASSOCIATES, P.A.- —
Land Surveyors - Land Planning
Environmental Planning - Computer Graphics
P.O. Box 12034
New Bert, NC 26562
Tel. [phone]
Fax: [phone]
DATE: 03-- 30-- 1999 GRAPHIC SC; �1 Lii JOB NO. 4,ad16a''
np U <O 40 80 160
( IN FEET )
I Jnc•h 10 ft

APR.16.1999 8:10AM MORTON INTL N ANDOVER
NO.851 —"-_P . 1
apqorforj-
Date: � 1
Number of Pages _
(Including Cover Sheet)
To: Aayne:
Phone:Q`Q d Far:
From frame: %///,/? D �
Locatiun: //-r A cOG
Subject / Memo: Ze, J
V,
�.��,�� r .ice �.e �, /, ':
Q URGE.W - Please hand deliver immediately (Including Copyholders below)
a Please copy antidistrib2ne ia,
U Rrgi_stered .11ad DjiNI•Ll-l'
Fax Transnuttal Form

April 9, 199�
Mr. AI Ndgc a
112 Seattle Slew
Ilaveloclr, NC 28532
Mr_ Dick Holbert
P.O. Boa 161
Havelock, NC 28532
Dear Al and. Dick;
I received the results of the land survey on Lot 13 this week and have been working to deterntine he
relationships of my proposed dock to the existmg docks_ I have super impol;od the riparian lines as
developed by CAMA on ray West survey map. The LAMA lines are based on the plan that Scutt Janes
and Ted Tyndall presented to us dming my Urtuch 8, 1999 visit to The Moorings_ As pmmised, I am
sending both of you the results. The outcome 15 somewhat surprising. According to the new infonnaboar. I
calculate that Lot 14 dock is in'violatiom of the set back requirement fmm the riparian lime by
approximatety 24 feet_ This puts the construction approximately 9 feet over the riparian Ime and pttts the
dock design w;, cams up tix7tb in question_ I am afraid that my dock will be m gross violations of Dick's
riparian line.
One of the stipuL3rions that I bad made daring my last,.tiSit uas butt the plan not violate any apmian Imes
or set backs. Mary-Tane and I axe not comfortable with building the dock so Hutt it violates the riparian line
or set back to any unreasonable extent A verbal agroemew made m good faith todw by both illy neighbors
may not holdup when the original people have moved. on. We do not want to leave ourselves open to this
kind of situation. We have made a very large investment in this Property and naturally we want to protect
k
Al, durimg my latest visit to The Moorings, you mentioned that von believed that your doek was built inside
your riparian line setback by one foot_ 'Aat means that you should have expected your neighbor to build
his dock right on bis 15 lbd riparian line set back as well. In this case, the mir uuti distance You could
expect between the dock construction would be about 31 feet. In view of the latest infomtation, I am
proposing to build my dock I feet away $our youx dock. 13as4ca311v, this new plain follows closely to the
original permitted plan at the time of our purchase of the property. Regardless of any proposed design, it
should not be construed as a giving up of our ripa6 m rights,
The proposed plan to build our dock 31 feet from your dock would also can for me to be in violation of our
riparian line set back on Dick's side (south side) b'v one to two feet. We can live Rzth this if Dick can. In
this way, if Dick moves on and the new m)ghbors have a problem with it, we could ahmys; chop off one to
two feet at the end ofthe dock, We could also design and build my dock with this scenario iu mid_
Likew se, I would not expect Dick to gr a up his ipw1an rights either. I would only expect Dick to give us
permission to be slightly over the riparian line at one very specific part of the dock oonstrucu m, Future
consCCuctitm on the dock would follow the ripanau rules. In other words, any future construction on lire
dock sections that are m violation would lave to confermm to the CAMA regulations and any violations
would have to be cleared unless permission is granted anew by the owner of the property that is being
infringed upon.
AL we believe that we are beano reasonable and gencrom in this situation. If we were to exerc& our
riparian rights end assuming my planing is correct then the distances between the two docks would be
extremely close. Essentially, you would hive very limited access to the inside docks (See enclosure).
Clearly we do not waist this to be the rase. But, Mary -lane and I also want to protect our inivsftneat at The
Moorings.

► APR.1E.1999 8:10AM 11ORTON INTL N ANDOVER
NO.851 P.3
The new design will haft the boathouse on ft south side. VAth the boathom on the south side and the
fha that your dock will angle away from our dock, it should gift yo11 plenty of room to maneuver pour
boat Eby, the area for mneuwnng &hwld be well in E'!tcess of 31 feet_
I have enclosed a ,copy of the lot smvey done by Suitt & Associates shovdug the rehmonslup off 13 to
Lots 12 and 14. I have shown the ripataian line as established by LAMA and I bout drawn what I propose is
the latest plan for construction of my dock. Please eaca nme it and oome back to me with comments f&
coWdemation. Dud% my April 19, 1999 visit I will bring the actual blueprint for more detailed
auunimfion-
I hope that the latest plmo will be acceQtable to 41 parties iavolvsed and will xtot cause anyone any undue
hardship. Mary Jane and I value your filendship and hVe that the latest des elop Wts do not jeopardize
our friendly relations.
RespectWly yam,
Ouwnd Mary Jane Rei
Enclosure