48902_CATALIOTTI, ANTHONY_20070302

❑ CAMA / ❑ DREDGE & FILL ,�,/ 48902
GENERAL PERMIT Previous permit# 0
❑New ❑Modification ❑Complete Reissue El Partial Reis a2 Date previous permit issued
As authorized by the State of North Carolina, Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant to 15A NCAC
❑ Rules attached.
Applicant Name
Address
City 6 �'� t `,y- State _ ZIP.'
Phone # Fax #
Authorized Agent
Affected ❑ CW ❑ EW ❑ PTA ❑ ES ❑ PTS
AEC(s): ❑ OEA ❑ HHF ❑ IH ❑ UBA ❑ N/A
❑ PWS: ❑ FC:
ORW: yes / no PNA yes / no Crit.Hab. yes / no
Project Location: County
Street Address/ State Road/ Lot #(s) +` .>, 'A -
Subdivision
City ZIP
Phone # ( ) `i `!' ! % ' River Basin
Adj. Wtr. Body - i�. t i (nat /man /unkn)
Closest Maj. Wtr. Body
Type of Project/ Activity
v_
(Scale: )
Pier (dock) length
Platform(s)
Finger pier(s)
Groin length
number
Bulkhead/ Riprap length
avg distance offshore
max distance offshore
Basin, channel
cubic yards
Boat ramp
Boathouse/ Boatlift
Beach Bulldozing
Other
Shoreline Length
SAV: not sure yes r no
Sandbags: not sure yes no
Moratorium: n/a yes no
Photos: yes �,no
Waiver Attached: yes i no
A building permit may be required by:
Notes/ Special Conditions
Agent or Applicant' rinted Name
Signature "Please read compliance statement on back of permit"
Application Fee(s) Check #
E See note on back regarding River Basin rules.
Permit Officer's Signature
r" C
Issuing Date Expiration Date
Local Planning Jurisdiction Rover File Name

Statement of Compliance and Consistency
This permit is subject to compliance with this application, site drawing and attached general and specific conditions. Any
violation of these terms may subject the permittee to a fine or criminal or civil action; and may cause the permit to become
null and void.
This permit must be on the project site and accessible to the permit officer when the project is inspected for compliance. The
applicant certifies by signing this permit that [)prior to undertaking any activities authorized by this permit, the applicant will
confer with appropriate local authorities to confirm that this project is consistent with the local land use plan and all local
ordinances, and 2) a written statement or certified mail return receipt has been obtained from the adjacent riparian
landowner(s) .
The State of North Carolina and the Division of Coastal Management, in issuing this permit under the best available
information and belief, certifythatthis project is consistentwith the North Carolina Coastal Management Program.
River Basin Rules Applicable To Your Project:
❑ Tar- Pamlico River Basin Buffer Rules ❑ Other:
❑ Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules
If indicated on front of permit, your project is subject to the Environmental Management Commission's Buffer Rules for the
River Basin checked above due to its location within that River Basin. These buffer rules are enforced by the NC Division of
Water Quality. Contact the Division of Water Quality at the Washington Regional Office (252-946-6481) or the Wilmington
Regional Office (910-796-7215) for more information on how to comply with these buffer rules.
Division of Coastal Management Offices
Raleigh Office
Mailing Address:
1638 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638
Location:
2728 Capital Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
919-733-2293
Fax:[phone]
Morehead City Headquarters
400 Commerce Ave
Morehead City, NC 28557
252-808-2808/ 1-888ARCOAST
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Carteret, Craven, Onslow -above
New River Inlet- and Pamlico Counties)
Elizabeth City District
1367 U.S. 17 South
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
252-264-3901
Fax:[phone]
(Serves: Camden, Chowan, Currituck,
Dare, Gates, Pasquotank and Perquimans
Counties)
Washington District
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
252-946-6481
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Beaufort, Bertie, Hertford, Hyde,
Tyrrell and Washington Counties)
Wilmington District
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
910-796-7215
Fax:[phone]
(Serves: Brunswick, New Hanover,
Onslow -below New River Inlet- and
Pender Counties)
Revised 08/09/06

, < ,
0
•
:5"r A­

- NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Michael F. Easley, Governor Charles S. Jones, Director William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
March 7, 2007
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Anthony Cataliotti
100 Wind Tide Lane
Havelock, NC 28532
RE: DENIAL OF CAMA GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
PROJECT ADDRESS- 100 Wind Tide Lane
Dear Mr. Cataliotti:
After reviewing your request in conjunction with the development standards required by
the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA), it is the determination of this Division that
no permit may be granted for the project that you have proposed. You have requested
to construct a mooring at 100 Wind Tide Lane, in Mitchell Creek, near Havelock, Craven
County. The proposed mooring included a 200-pound mushroom anchor, 12 feet of/z"
chain, 12 feet of '/2" cable, and a mooring buoy. The mooring was requested for your
27' powerboat. The mooring was proposed to be located at approximately 1/3 the width
of the water body.
Your request is inconsistent with 15 NCAC 07H .2205(d), which states: "Freestanding
mooring buoys and piles shall be evaluated based upon the arc of the swing including
the vessel to be moored. Moorings and the attached vessel shall not interfere with the
access to any riparian property, and shall have a minimum setback of 15 feet from the
adjacent property lines...".
The mooring as proposed would have an arc of swing of 102'. Your application states
that you have 110 feet of shoreline perpendicular to Mitchell Creek. The arc of the
swing of the vessel must be set back from the riparian line to the east by 15 feet and set
back from the riparian line to the west by 15 feet unless specifically waived by the
adjacent riparian owner. Therefore your available area for a mooring is effectively 110'
— 30' = 80'. The arc of the swing of the proposed mooring would exceed the area
available for a mooring. It should also be noted that the proposed mooring setup does
not meet recognized standards for permanent mooring construction, especially related
to the size and length of the rode for the mooring.
400 Commerce Avenue, Nlorehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
A,- Equal Occer,� rr.,; ' .Arirma!ive Acaor Emcic-er - 50". Recyc:ec � 10% Pos: CcrsLmer Paper

ANTHONY CATALIOTTI
MARCH 7, 2007
PAGE 2
We have received objections to your project from local and adjacent property owners
that have raised concerns including navigational and safety issues that appear to have
credibility with regard to the rules and regulations. If you wish to modify your project
and reapply, the Division will consider a revised application under the major permit
process in accordance with 15A NCAC 07J.1106 to ensure that potential navigational
.and safety issues are addressed.
Should you wish to appeal this decision to the Coastal Resource Commission or
request a variance from that group, please contact me so I can provide you with the
proper forms and any other information you may require. The Division of Coastal
Management must receive appeal notices within twenty (20) days of the date of this
letter in order to be considered.
Respectfully yours,
Tere Barrett
District Manager, MHC
cc: Charles Jones, Division Director
Stephen Lane, Coastal Management Representative

100 WIND TIDE LANE -HAVELOCK, NC ADJACENT RIPARIA...
Subject: 100 WIND TIDE LANE -HAVELOCK, NC ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER
STATEMENT
From: "Wiler, Neal" <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:18:03 -0600
To: <[e-mail]>
CC: <[e-mail]>
JONATHAN:
Per our discussion this morning, attached are the documents that I've received from Anthony Cataliotti of.the
above address in the Mitchell Harbour subdivision, regarding his proposed construction in Mitchell Creek, Craven
County.
I am entering my objection to this proposed construction for the following reason: the cover letter's description of
the proposed concrete ramp and the. enclosed drawing's depiction of the ramp's location don't appear consistent
to me. I need a further explanation of exactly what Tony is proposing, overall, and where it/they will be installed.
[I have copied Ray Simpson on this e-mail as he is owner of an undivided half interest in Lot D, as am I. Lot D in
immediately adjacent to Tony's Lot 9.] Any clarification of this request from Tony that you can provide me would
be greatly appreciated. Thanks for your help.
Regards,
Neal Wiler
303.376.6914 (b)
Content -Description: D00008.PDF
D00008.PDF Content -Type: application/octet-stream
Content -Encoding: base64
1 of 1 3/12/2007 2:21 PM

Anthony J. Cataliotti
100 Wind Tide Lane
Havelock, NC 28532
February 22, 2007
Gentlemen,
Attached hereto is my request to modify my existing dock to add another mooring
piling, a floating ride on dock for my Wave Ramer and a concrete ramp, similar to the
dock's existing construction material. Also included is the form necessary for your
approval/notification-
Please review the drawing and return the form as soon as possible, as I would like to get
this accomplished quickly.
I need the additional mooring piling as I have decided not to have a boat lift. The piling
will be in line with the other two existing pilings and well within my property lines. The
floating dock .will be within the boundaries of the existing concrete dock, and the ramp
will be used to facilitate entering and exiting the dock. The existing dock is too high to
easily make the transition for older or infirm guests.
Thank -you in advance for your prompt acquiesce to my request
Sincerely,
2 Attachments
a. LAMA Form
b. Drawing of modification

ADJA.CEN7 RIPARIAN PROPERTY 0117s"ER. STATEMENT
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to j.CJJ1 0 7L 's
(1`ame of Property Owner)
propert} located at L o o B
r (Lot, Mock, Road, etc.)
on �.//cLi e z% ' k , in �h r,��� , I.C.
(Waterbody) (Town and/or County)
He has described to me as s1m-n below, the development he is proposing at that location,
and, I have no objec4ions to his.proposal.
DESCRIPTION ,ANTWOR DRAZ UNG OF PROPOSED DE TLOPAIEh'T
(% be filltd in by individual proposing dtrd meal)
c�A
Signature -
Print or Tyre N12me
Telephone Number
Date: .
—29-

Anthony J. Cataliotti
100 Wind Tide Lane
Havelock, NC 28532
February 22, 2007
IVIOrQ110ad1 city DOM
Gentlemen,
Attached hereto is my request to modify my existing dock to add another mooring
piling, a floating ride on dock for my Wave Runner and a concrete ramp, similar to the
docks existing construction material. Also included is the form necessary for your
approval/notification.
Please review the drawing and return the form as soon as possible, as I would like to get
this accomplished quickly.
I need the additional mooring piling as I have decided not to have a boat lift. The piling
will be in line with the other two existing pilings and well within my property lines. The
floating dock will be within the boundaries of the existing concrete dock, and the ramp
will be used to facilitate entering and exiting the dock. The existing dock is too high to
easily make the transition for older or infirm guests.
Thank -you in advance for your prompt acquiesce to my request_
Sincerely,
Anthony J. Cataliotti 2 Attachments
a. CAMA Form
b. Drawing of modification

ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY 01VIXTER STATEMENT
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to J, cc 0'
2 Ali' -3
(:Fame of Property Owner)
prqpeiV'1oM'W at Lu
Z41_-Z'
(Lot, Mock, Road, etc.)
onZ_yZ4 4in- CA*_�X,_a_.,,,,
(VY2terbody) (Town and/or County)
He has described to me as shown below, the developnient JlCiS PfOPOSin.0, 2t that location,
and, J have no objections to his.proposal.
DMIUMONAN TWOR DRAMING OF PROPOSED DEITLOPMENIT
(To be flUed In by individual proposing deve*menl)
4_4 A .5( 1— 'i t"
JVj()r0hoad City QCM
Signature
Print Or T)?C N2M6
e�2
Telepthonie Number
Date: 7
-29-

0 'o 10,
E
11
U7

N Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 it Restricted Delivery is desired.
IIIII Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
E Attach this card to the back of the matilpiece,
or on the !V-1 spare permits.
1. Article Address to:
s'
o s'
A. Signature
0 Agent
X E] Addressee
B. Received ly (Printed tarnreTC. D to f Delivery
D. �s delivery address different from item 1? 0 Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: 11 No
3. Se "cefiType
Oe,fied Mail 0 Express Mail
0 Registered 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise
0 Insured Mail 0 C.O-D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes
2. Ara
7006 2150 0003 5758 2717
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540
F
U.S. Postal ServiceT'.',
CERTIFIED MAIL,,
RECEIPT
1 (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance
Coverage
Provided)
ru
r—
M77.71
ru
':0
Ln
17�
Postage
$
Ln
Certified Fee
M
Postmark
O
Return Receipt Fee
Here
(Endorsement Required)
Restricted Delivery Fee
r-3
(Endorsement Required)
L-17)
r-9
Total Postage & Fees
rij
Sent To
1:3
C3
-STrWjF,AFt.W .......... ------------------------
—C)
:�
------------- ----- ---- P'/
17�-
or PO Box No. I
---------------------- ................
-- --------------
-------------------------------
City, State, ZIP+4
PS Form 3800, August 2006
See Reverse for Instructions 1 L
(Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided)
1ti
For delivery information visit our website at
www.usps.com�,
ru
Fd—
Ln
$
17�
Postage
Ln
Certified Fee
M
Postmark
IZ3
EZI
Return Receipt Fee
(Endorsement Required)
Here
C3
Restricted Delivery Fee
C3
(Endorsement Required)
Ln
r-9
Total Postage & Fees
-.
$ C-4 4111
ru
-0
Sent To
• -----------
or PO Box No. 2 ------- -------
P -------------------------
- ---
----- ---
City, State, ZIP+
PS Form 3800, August 2W6 See
Reverse for Instructiolva.-
PAQroahowl pity
I

100 WIND TIDE LANE -HAVELOCK, NC ADJACENT RIPARIA...
Subject: 100 WIND TIDE LANE -HAVELOCK, NC ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER
STATEMENT]
From: "Wiler, Neal" <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:26:52 -0600
To: <[e-mail]>
CC: "Wray Simpson" <[e-mail]>, "BMERCER" <[e-mail]>, "Tony
Cataliotti" <[e-mail]>
JONATHAN;
I've had a chance to review Mr. Cataliotti's additional information regarding his proposed "ramp" to be connected
to his existing dock. As it is just a substitute for stairs that were never installed, and is a simple lineal extension of
the existing dock's structure on to the shore, I don't see any problem with his proposal.
As a result, I hereby remove my objection to his proposed construction in Mitchell Creek, as outlined in his
various attachments to this e-mail. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding my comments.
Thanks.
Regards,
Neal Wiler
From: Tony Cataliotti[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 3:58 AM
To: Wiler, Neal
Cc: J Howell
Subject: Fw: [Fwd: 100 WIND TIDE LANE -HAVELOCK, NC ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER
STATEMENT]
Mr. Howell has been kind enough to send me the question you had. Evidentally, the MHPOA has an incorrect e-mail address for you, as
my repeated requests to address the issues have been unanswered. I believe the connoctation of a ramp may be misleading. It is NOT a
"RAMP" per se. When I had the dock constructed, I had intended to have two or three steps on to it. After having the dock for about
two years without the steps, and just an appox two foot step up, it became apparent to me that this was not only inconvenient but
uncomfortable when trying to carry items to the dock. The ramp dipicted on the drawing will be an extension of the dock from appox
ground level to the existing level of the dock
It will not be a ramp to launch boats or any thing like that. It will be in lieu of the steps I had originally envisioned. I hope this clarifies
your issues and you will inform Mr. Howell that your objections are removed. If you need any further clarifications, please contact me via
e-mail so we can move forwrd with this project.
Thank -you in advance for your prompt reply.
-----Forwarded Message -----
From: Jonathan Howell
Sent: Apr 9, 2007 8:53 AM
To: Tony Cataliotti
Subject: [Fwd: 100 WIND TIDE LANE -HAVELOCK, NC ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER STATEMENT]
------- Original Message --------
Subject: 100 WIND TIDE LANE -HAVELOCK, NC ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER STATEMENT
Date:Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:18:03 -0600
From:Wiler, Neal <[e-mail]>
To:<ionathan.howell @ncmail.net>
CC:<manatsea@ insight.rr.com>
1 of 2 511f2007 5:02 PM

100 WIND TIDE LANE -HAVELOCK, NC ADJACENT RIPARIA...
JONATHAN:
Per our discussion this morning, attached are the documents that I've received from Anthony Cataliotti of
the above address in the Mitchell Harbour subdivision, regarding his proposed construction in Mitchell
Creek, Craven County.
I am entering my objection to this proposed construction for the following reason: the cover letter's
description of the proposed concrete ramp and the enclosed drawing's depiction of the ramp's location
don't appear consistent to me. I need a further explanation of exactly what Tony is proposing, overall,
and where it/they will be installed.
[I have copied Ray Simpson on this e-mail as he is owner of an undivided half interest in Lot D, as am I.
Lot D in immediately adjacent to Tony's Lot 9.] Any clarification of this request from Tony that you can
provide me would be greatly appreciated. Thanks for your help.
Regards,
Neal Wiler
303.376.6914 (b)
Content -Description: D00008.PDF
D00008.PDF Content -Type: application/octet-stream
Content -Encoding: base64
2 of 2 5/1/2007 5:02 PM

66-30/531
Uth,olly f catatiotti 06.O4 133 369
,Jluray it eataiiotti l 1
i oo Jura
Udc Gr DAT I S1 0(
jktrelock LNG' 28532
PAY TO Pit
ORDER Of Qp.
rn / [1O11AR5 ' LJ
l look for: Micro Prints ilmc line, t rav IYpe and Imrx%orl,. 1 nsl Citizens Bank lop, on flail. V m.l present. do "'t <a�h
FIRST CITIZENS BANK
www.firstcIft � /
FOR ----- - �. -- - ^ --`----- -
j:053L003001:OO13L749927011- 003 9