57134_PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS_20110221 (2)

Type of Project/ Activity
s�
1 I;;_, ✓ = v 1
Pie (dock) length
Platform(s) 1
Finger piers)
Groin length .
number
Bulkhead/ Riprap length`
avg distance offshore_
max distance offshore
Basin, channel
cubic yards_
Boat ramp
Boathouse/ Boatlift
Beach Bulldozing
Other
s
_ 0
Scale:
'/A )
Shoreline Length
Ni? 57134 �
❑ CAMA / OREDGE & FILL
SAV: not sure
'" yes no,
GENERAL PERMIT
I
Previous permit#
]' New ElModification []Complete Reissue ❑Partial Reissue
Date previous permit issued
As authorized by the State of North Carolina, Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
yes no
and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant
to 15A NCAC
Photos:
C. iltil � l✓ i Gii %7
Applicant Name f; t2r - f'Gt - C` �i c" '
Project Location:
Rules attached.
County
Waiver Attached:
' O (.1 (
Addressl�
Street Address/ State Road/ Lot #(s)
} n !
City ! V e� ,a jrb%S�'r State
A building permit may
be required by: (COCA- 11See
Phone # O Fax # (`
Subdivision
R.
Authorized Agent
City t
r `, -(7 ZIP
❑ CW ❑ EW .PTA ❑ ES OPTS
Phone # O
River Basin''.
Affected
AEC(s): 0 OEA El ❑ IH ❑ UBA O N/A
Adj. Wtr. Body
c
C nai ,` man unkn
o PWS: ❑ Fc:
no
Closest Maj. Wtr.
a ,;
Body1eluS - V .i,
ORW: yes IC Y' PNA yes / Crit.Hab. yes /
Type of Project/ Activity
s�
1 I;;_, ✓ = v 1
Pie (dock) length
Platform(s) 1
Finger piers)
Groin length .
number
Bulkhead/ Riprap length`
avg distance offshore_
max distance offshore
Basin, channel
cubic yards_
Boat ramp
Boathouse/ Boatlift
Beach Bulldozing
Other
s
_ 0
Scale:
'/A )
Shoreline Length
SAV: not sure
'" yes no,
I
Sandbags: not sure
yes no
I
Moratorium: n/a
yes no
Photos:
yes no [�.
Waiver Attached:
yes no9i
i
I
A building permit may
be required by: (COCA- 11See
note on back regarding River Basin rules.
.,
Notes/ Special Conditions �Z� L l_
�1 ("ce
i
0V
Agent. r Applicant Printed Name
PermifOfficer'; Signature
e7
�' f
Signature Pleas
ad compliance statement on back of perVIK f.
`L
Iss � gPat
�, a i fs `' tion Date
� c ", ✓
j%/ {1 /// �,►
� {//jyyf }/.
I\{,jam`
r1(•.�
ly
ApplicattionFee(s)'
Check#
Local Pianningjurisdiction
RereH%leHffr1e

A-742 �
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor James H. Gregson, Director Dee Freeman, Secretary
December 22, 2010
RK&K
Attn: William Snyder
845 Church Street
Suite 104
Concord, NC 28025
Dear Mr. Snyder:
Attached is General Permit #57134C for the installation of a new 4" diameter natural gas
pipeline by directional bore in Vanceboro, NC.
In order to validate this permit, please sign the permit as indicated. Retain the white copy for
your files and return the signed. yellow and pink copies to us in the enclosed, self-addressed
envelope. If the signed permit copies are not returned to this office before the initiation of
development, you will be working without authorization and will be subject to a Notice of
Violation and subsequent civil penalties.
We appreciate your early attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Brad Connell
Coastal Management Representative
lsb
Enclosures
400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Internet: www.nccoastaimanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer —50% Recycled \ 10% Post Consumer Paper

Check Date: 02/02/2011
Vendor Number: 0000948311
Check No.
1089080
Invoice Number
Invoice Date
Voucher ID Gross Amount
Discount Taken
Late Charge
Paid Amount
PROJECT26-39689
01/31/2011
01114714 400.00
0.00
0.00
400.00
Check Number
Date
Total
Gross Amount
Total
Discounts
Total
Late Charges
Tofal
Paid Amount
1089080
02/02i2011
$400.00
$0.00
$0.00
$400.00
QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS CHECK PLEASE CALL(704) 364-3120

`I
RKVK
William K. Hellmann IS February 2011 RECEIVED
Emeritus
FEB 2 1 2011
David Wallace Mr. Brad Connell
Stephenn G. Zentz
J. Michael Potter Division of Coastal Management MorehecdC11yDCM
Thomas E. Mohler North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
James A. Zito 400 Commerce Ave.
Michael W. Myers Morehead City, NC 25557
Robert J. Halbert
Subject: Piedmont Natural Gas
Charles M. Easter, Jr.
Swift Creek, Mauls Swamp and Unnamed Creek Horizontal Directional
Joseph A. Romanowski, Jr.
Drill Crossings
Michael L. Krupsaw
Vanceboro, Craven County, NC
Lars E. Hill
J. Tommy Peacock, Jr.
Dear Mr. Connell:
Martin C. Rodgers
Kenneth A. Goon
Richard J. Adams, Jr.
RK&K performed the engineering services for Piedmont Natural Gas for three
John A. d'Epagnier
proposed natural gas pipeline water body crossings. The three water bodies to be crossed
Barbara J. Hoage
are Swift Creek, Mauls Swamp and an unnamed creek in Vanceboro, NC. Please refer to
Christopher F. Wright
Owen L. Peery
Attachment A, which contains the project plans, for the exact locations of the crossings.
Nancy R. Bergeron
Discussions with your office indicated that these three water bodies are subject to the
Stuart A. Montgomery
requirements of the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) and that any work in or
David G. Vanscoy
around these waters would require a CAMA permit pursuant to 15A NCAC 07H.1600.
Henry J. Bankard, Jr.
James F. Ridenour, Jr.
The purpose of the pipeline crossings is to add natural gas distribution capacity in
Robert J. Andryszak
Raymond M. Harbeson, Jr.
Vanceboro. The proposed pipeline will be medium density polyethylene (MDPE), SDR
B. Keith Skinner
11.5, 4 -inch diameter pipe. The natural gas pipeline will be installed beneath the water
Karen B. Kahl
bodies by horizontal directional drilling (HDD) methods. No land disturbance or
Seyed A. Saadat
John C. Moore
construction activities will occur within the banks or adjacent wetlands of any of the three
Eric M. Klein
water bodies. Additionally, the pipeline will be located at depths from thirteen to twenty -
Todd E. Rousenberger
three feet beneath the bottom of the water bodies and no drill entry or exit location will be
Donald P. Lauzon
closer than 100 feet to any stream bank. Please refer to the attached plan sheets for the
Thomas M. Heil
Robert D. Ostermiller
specific installation profiles at each proposed crossing.
Barry L. Brandt
Malachi M. Mills, Ill
In order to satisfy the requirements of the CAMA permit, notifications were sent by
James A. Burnett
certified mail to the adjacent riparian property owners. The following property owners
Brian L. Hepting
were notified.
Michael V. Gaffney
Lee C. Yowell
Steven L. Thomas
David A. Willoughby
Engineers I Construction Managers � Planners � Scientists
Q

PBG Vanceboro, NC CAMA Permit
18 February 2011
Page 2
F AML � irl'; AN
Property Owner
Adjacent Water Body
Mr. & Mrs. Robert Werner
Swift Creek
Craven County
Swift Creek
Ms. Beth Taylor Jordan
Unnamed Creek on Farmlife Ave
Town of Vanceboro
Unnamed Creek on Farmlife Ave.
Mr. John Hill Sr.
Mauls Swamp
All five return receipts were received indicating successful delivery of the notifications. Four of the
five property owners returned the signed Adjacent Riparian Property Owner Statement indicating that
they had no objections to the proposed project. Only the Town of Vanceboro failed to return the signed
owner statement. However, town personnel have had discussions with Piedmont Natural Gas regarding
placement of the natural gas pipeline and have not objected to the proposed project. The signed owner
statements, return receipt for the Vanceboro notification and signed authorized agent form are included as
Attachment B.
In addition to contacting the adjacent property owners, the Washington Field Office of the Army
Corp of Engineers was contacted to verify the nationwide permit (NWP) required for work around Swift
Creek. Washington Field Office personnel verified that the proposed work fell under the jurisdiction of a
Section 10, NWP 12 and that written approval is not required. However, a Pre -Construction Notification
Form (PCN) was requested and is included as Attachment C. A Jurisdictional Investigation was
completed in August 2010 at the project site. The Jurisdictional Investigation Report is included as
Attachment D. A copy of this letter and attachments is being submitted concurrently to the Washington
Field Office.
Thank you for expediting your review of this submittal. A check for the $400.00 permit fee is
included with this package. Should you have any questions please contact me at [e-mail] or at
[phone]. Please send the approved permit to Dan Rouse of Piedmont Natural Gas with a copy to
RK&K.
William Dan Rouse
Piedmont Natural Gas
111 Corporate Lane
New Bern, NC 28562
Enclosure
William Snyder, P.E.
RK&K
845 Church St. North Suite 104
Concord, NC 28025
Sincerely,
William P. Snyder, P.E.
Project Manager
Cc: Dan Rouse, Piedmont Natural Gas
William Wescott, USACE — Washington Field Office

RSC K
FEB 1, 1 201
ATTACHMENT A: PROJECT PLANS
Engineers � Construction Managers � Planners � Scientists

STREETS FERRY ROAD ® SWIFT CREEK - HDD
FARMLIFE AVENUE 0 NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD - HDD
Piedmont
Natural Gas
VANCEBORO
NA TUBAL GAS PIPELINE HDD
LOCATION MAP
FEBRUARY, 2010
FARMLIFE AVENUE ® UNNAMED CREEK - HDD
MAULS SWAMP - HDD
FEB 2 1 2011
INDEX OF SHEETS
SHEET TITLE SHEET NO.
COVER
-
LEGEND
PNG-VB-LEGEND
GENERAL NOTES
PNG-VB-NOTES
PLAN & PROFILE SHEET
PNG-VB-001 THRU
PNG-VB-004
MISCELLANEOUS PE DETAILS
PNG-VB-DO01
EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DETAILS
PNG-VB-DO02
PRELIMINARY
ISSUED FOR PERMITTING
PURPOSES ONLY
RUMMEL, KLEPPER & KAHL, LLP
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
845 CHURCH ST. NORTH, SUITE 102
R#C-K FC0118025
PHONE: [phone]

REFERENCE SECTION
LINETYPE
KEYS
ABBREVIATIONS
SYMBOLS KEYS
REVISION SECTION
BUILDINGS
CB
CATCH BASIN
❑
CATCH BASIN/DRAIN INLET
DATE REV. DESCRIPTION BY
CMP
CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
/- ls-OA
DIMENSION (TYPICAL)
z IB 11 0 ISSUED FOR PERMITTING DAW
CUT LINE ----E-------------
c --------
CO
CLEAN OUT
®
ELECTRIC BOX
CP
CONTROL POINT (HDD)
DRIVEWAYS
CD
CHECK DAM
do
FIRE HYDRANT
TEST DATA
EDGE -OF -PAVEMENT
DI
EIP
DRAIN INLET
EXISTING IRON PIN
W
GAS VALVE
LOCATION:
EXISTING CABLE TELEVISION (OVERHEAD)
TV TV
TV TV
FH
FM
FIRE HYDRANT
FORCE MAIN SANITARY SEWER
>—
®
GUY WIRE
HAND HOLE
DATE: DURATION:
PRESSURE:
EXISTING CABLE TELEVISION (UNDERGROUND)
UTV UTV
— UTV
FMV
FORCE MAIN VALVE
O
IRON PIN
CONTRACTOR: WITNESS:
FO
FIBER OPTIC CABLE
NOTES
0 STREET LAMP
EXISTING ELECTRIC (OVERHEAD)
OE OE
OE OE
GM
GAS MAIN
°
❑ MISCELLANEOUS OBJECTS
GV GAS VALVE
EXISTING ELECTRIC (UNDERGROUND) UE UE UE — UE GR GUARDRAIL NORTH ARROW
HDD
HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILL
u
POWER POLE (UTILITY POLE)
EXISTING FIBER OPTICS (TELEPHONE)
EXISTING FORCE MAIN (SANITARY SEWER)
FO FO
FM FM
FO FO
FM FM —
IP
OE
PE
INLET PROTECTOR
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC
POLYETHYLENE PIPE
101
ss
PROPOSED POLE (UTILITY POLE)
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
SIGN
FER 201p
�YtlPr3j�iF�C°P
EXISTING GAS
GAS GAS
GAS
PP
POWER POLE (UTILITY POLE)
STORM DRAIN MANHOLE®I
PIP
PIPE INLET PROTECTOR
p
TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
EXISTING STORM DRAIN = _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ =
RR
R/W
RAILROAD
RIGHT-OF-WAY
(Cl
TELEVISION PEDESTAL
EXISTING TELEPHONE (UG)
UT UT
UT UT
RCP
REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
0-
TEST BORING
SD
STORM DRAIN
®
TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX
EXISTING WATER
w W
W W
SM
SEED AND MULCH
8
TRANSFORMER
FENCE
SF
SS
TELE
SILT FENCE
SANITARY SEWER
TELEPHONE CABLE
II
(�
TRANSMISSION TOWER
TREE
FILL LINE -----F°-------------F---------
N
TV CABLE
WATER WATER MANHOLE
PROPERTY LINE -------------------
UE
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
®
WATER METER
OPEN WATER - STREAM
-
- - - - ---
UG
UT
UNDERGROUND
UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE
WATER VALVE
WETLAND
PRELIMINARY
ISSUED FOR PERMITTING
PURPOSES ONLY
UTV
UNDERGROUND TV CABLE
PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED
W
WATER
MATERIALS UST
WM
WATER MAIN
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
WV
WATER VALVE
PROPOSED GAS
PROPOSED GUARDRAIL
PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY ---------------
PROPOSED ROAD
RAILROAD111
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I III III
as Ror mss X102
�'� D "{ :e T
vxore �w-Taz-rze
DESIGNED BY: AS
DRAWN BY: yas
CHECKED BY: DAN
RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY ----
RR -------
RR ----
RK&K CDM. No. 8D9-100 DATE
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS AFE NO.31 2/18/1
1 NTS
ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY ----WM-------WM----
SANITARY SEWER
SS SS
SS
Piedmont
Natural Gas
SILT FENCE
SF SF
SF SF
TREELINE (WOODLINE)
SHEET DESCRIPTION
LEGEND
DRAWING. PNG-VBLEGEND REvsION: p

v':
REFERENCE SECTION
GENERAL NOTES 23. THE PILOT HOLE SHALL BE DRILLED ALONG THE PATH SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND PROFILE DRAWING
1. ALL CONSTRUCTION METHODS AND MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO MAINTAINING THE SPECIFIED TOLERANCES.
THE CURRENT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS OF 24. THE OWNER SHALL APPROVE THE ALIGNMENT OF THE PILOT BORE BEFORE THE REAMING PHASE
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS AND NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OR PIPE PULLING MAY COMMENCE.
OF TRANSPORTATION (NCDOT).
2. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WT774 OSHA TITLE 29 OF THE CODE 25. IF THE PILOT BORE FAILS TO CONFORM TO THE ABOVE TOLERANCES, OWNER MAY, AT HIS OPTION,
REQUIRE A NEW PILOT BORE TO BE MADE.
OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS. CHAPTER 1 (29 CFR T926), "OCCUPATION
SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY" 26. IN ALL CASES, RIGHT OF WAY RESTRICTIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THE LISTED TOLERANCES.
REVISION SECTION
DATE REV. DESCRIPTION BY
J. TEMPORARY DRAINAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE PROVIDED 27. NO PILOT HOLE WILL BE ACCEPTED IF IT WILL RESULT IN ANY OF THE PIPELINE BEING INSTALLED IN
2/18/11 0 ISSUED FOR PERMITTING DAw
BY THE CONTRACTOR TO RELIEVE AREAS THAT MAY CAUSE DAMAGE VIOLATION OF RIGHT OF WAY RESTRICTIONS
TO THE ROADWAYS OR IMPEDE TRAFFIC AS DIRECTED BY THE NCOOT
WITHIN 774E PROJECT LIMITS 28. CONCERN FOR ADJACENT UTILITIES AND/OR STRUCTURES SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THE LISTED
TOLERANCES. LISTING OF TOLERANCES DOES NOT RELIEVE CONTRACTOR FROM RESPONSIBILITY FOR
4. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OR EXCAVATION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAFE OPERATIONS OR DAMAGE TO ADJACENT UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES
ASSUME THE RESPONSIBILITY OF LOCA77NG ANY UNDERGROUNDATA
U77LI77ES (PUBLIC AND/OR PRIVATE) THAT MAY EXIST IN THE AREA 29. ALL BEND RADIUS SHALL BE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN THOSE LISTED IN THE PROJECT PLANS.
TEST
LOCATION:
OF CONSTRUCTION. U77LITY OWNERS SHALL BE NOTIFIED INSTALLATION
IN ACCORDANCE WITH N.C. ONE CALL TIME REQUIREMENTS.
IN ADVANCE OF ANY EXCAVAT70N /N THE PROXIMITY OF 774E 30. THE CONTRACTOR, SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THESE PLANS, WILL DETERMINE THE EXACT
UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR, AT HIS OWN EXPENSE, SHALL BE METHOD AND TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLETING THE HDD CROSSINGS. EXCAVATED MUD PITS CONSTRUCTED
DATE DURATION:
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REPAIR OF EXISTING UTILITIES DAMAGED IN THE ENTRY AND EXIT AREAS WILL BE LIMITED TO THE PIPE BOREHOLE AREA ONLY.
PRESSURE:
DURING CON57RUCT70N. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE
N.C. ONE -CALL CENTER AT 1-800-632-4949 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE 31. AFTER COMPLET70N OF THE DIRECTIONAL DRILLING WORK, THE ENTRY AND EXIT PIT LOCATION SHALL BE
OF ANY CONSTRUCTION. RESTORED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONOIT70NS.
CONTRACTOR: WITNESS:
NOTES
PREREAMING REQUIREMENTS
5. CONTRACTOR
CONNEC77ONSLAND AVOIDEARLY DAMAGINGTE ALL SERTHESE DURING 32. AFTER THE PILOT HOLE IS ACCEPTED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM A SIMULTANEOUS REAM
CONSTRUCTION. AND PRODUCT PIPE PULL.
FFEB
6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGES 33. 774E MAXIMUM REAM SHALL BE 8 -INCHES FOR 714E 4 -INCH STEEL PIPE AND FOR THE 4 -INCH PE PIPE
AND/OR PENALTIES RESULTING FROM ALL NON-COMPLIANCE KITH UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
2 LI LO 11qq
1 2011
FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS AND ENCROACHMENT 34. BUOYANCY MODIFICATIONS SHALL BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR. ANY BUOYANCY
AGREEMENIS. MODIFICAT70N PROCEDURE PROPOSED FOR USE SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO OWNER OR ENGINEER FOR
APPROVAL. 774E CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO T74E PULL SECTION RESULT7NG FOR
Z ALL PAVEMENT DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE BUOYANCY MODIFICATIONS
RESTORED TO PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS BY THE
r,
CONTRACTOR ACCORDING TO NCOOT REQUIREMENTS. PULLBACK REQUIREMENTS
8. THE GAS MAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED SO AS TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM 35. CONTRACTOR SHALL PULL EXTRA LENGTH OF STEEL PRODUCT PIPE SO ONE WELD JOINT CAN BE EXAMINED.
OF TWENTY FOUR (24) INCHES OF CLEARANCE TO ALL OTHER OF SHALL OVERPULL A LENGTH EQUAL TO 5% OF THE TOTAL LENGTH OF EACH PE DRILL SO THE
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES WHERE THIS IS NOT CONDITION OF THE PE PIPE CAN BE EXAMINED.
POSSIBLE APPROPRIATE PROTECTION SHALL BE INSTALLED. 36. THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE TENSILE LOAD IMPOSED ON THE PRODUCT PIPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 34,600 LBF
9. ALL DRAINAGE PIPES AND STRUCTURES SHALL BE CLEANED OF FOR THE 4 -INCH STEEL PIPE AND 6200 LBF FOR THE 4 -INCH PE PIPE.
DEBRIS AND ERODED MATERIALS RESULTING FROM CONSTRUCTION. 37. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPORT THE PRODUCT PIPE PULL SECTION AS IF PROCEEDS DURING PULLBACK SO
THESE PIPES AND STRUCTURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED CLEAN THAT IT MOVES FREELY AND !S NOT OVER STRESSED.
DURING 774E PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION.
38. THE MAXIMUM SPACING OF PIPE SUPPORTS FOR THE PRODUCT PIPE DURING PULLBACK IS 100 -FEET:
10. ALL DISTURBED SLOPES SHALL BE RESTORED TO EXISTING GRADES 39. THE MAXIMUM SPACING FROM THE ENDS OF PRODUCT PIPE TO FIRST PIPE SUPPORT /S 40 -FEET:
AND STABILIZED WITH SEED AND TACK IF APPROPRIATE
DRILLING FLUIDS
11. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL 40. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT THE COMPOSITION OF ALL ORILUNG FLUIDS TO ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL.
MEASURES AS DESCRIBED ON THE PROJECT PLANS AND DETAILS
DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SURFACE RESTORATION UNTIL SUCH 41. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT USE ANY DRILLING FLUID THAT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND
MEASURES ARE NOT NECESSARY. WHERE ADDITIONAL MEASURES EVIROMENTAL REGULATIONS.
ARE NECESSARY, 774E CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN
THE APPROPRIATE MEASURES ACCORDING TO THE NORTH CAROLINA 42. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING, TRANSPORTING, AND STORING ANY WATER REQUIRED FOR
PRELIMINARY
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING DESIGN MANUAL. DRILLING FLUIDS
ISSUED FOR PERMITTING
12, SEED ALL DIS77JRBED AREAS AND MULCH AS REQUIRED. 43. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAXIMIZE RECIRCULATION OF DRILLING FLUID SURFACE RETURNS.
PURPOSES ONLY
VARIATIONS IN PLAN OR PROFILE 44. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SOLIDS CONTROL AND FLUID CLEANING EQUIPMENT OF A CONF7GURAT70N AND
CAPACITY THAT CAN PROCESS SURFACE RETURNS AND PRODUCE DRILLING FLUID SUTABLE FOR REUSE.
13. THE CONTRACTOR MAY REQUEST CHANGES TO THE PROPOSED VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT 45. DISPOSAL OF EXCESS DRILLING FLUIDS IS 714E RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN
OF 774E INSTALLATION AND THE LOCATION OF THE ENTRY AND EXIT POINTS PROPOSED CHANGES SHALL COMPLIANCE WITH ALL ENWROMENTA REGULATIONS, RIGHT OF WAY, AND WORKSPACE AGREEMENTS, AND PERMIT
BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER AND RECEIVE APPROVAL OF THE OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. REQUIREMENTS.
MATERIALS LIST
REM DESCRIPTION on.
14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT (PLAN VIEW) AS INDICATED ON
THE PROJECT PLANS WITH A +/- 2 FOOT VARIANCE. 46, CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT DRILLING FLUID DISPOSAL PROCEDURES TO OWNER FOR APPROVAL.
15, CONTROL POINT ELEVATIONS SHOWN INDICATE THE MINIMUM COVER AND SHALL NOT BE REDUCED. 47. CONTRACTOR SHALL EMPLOY BEST EFFORTS TO MAINTAIN FULL ANNULAR CIRCULATION OF DRILLING FLUID.
THE CONTRACTOR MAY DRILL DEEPER WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER. 48. DRILLING FLUID RETURNS AT LOCATIONS OTHER THAN THE ENTRY AND EXIT PITS SHALL BE MINIMIZED.
PILOT HOLE REQUIREMENTS 49. IN THE EVENT THAT ANNULAR CIRCULA77ON IS LOST CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ACTION TO RESTORE CIRCULATION.
16. 774E CONTRACTOR SHALL AT ALL TIMES PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN INSTRUMENTATION WHICH WILL 50. IF INADVERTENT SURFACE RETURNS OF DRILLING FLUIDS OCCUR, CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY CONTAIN AND COLLECT
ACCURATELY LOCATE THE PILOT HOLE, MEASURE DRILL STRING AXIAL AND TORSION LOADS, AND
MEASURE DRILLING FLUID DISCHARGE RATE AND PRESSURE.
17. THE OWNER WILL HAVE ACCESS TO THESE INSTRUMENTS AND THEIR READINGS AT ALL TIMES
18. THE CONTRACTOR, WHEN REQUESTED BY THE OWNER, WILL PROVIDE INSPECTION HOLES AT NO
ADDITIONAL COST TO VISUALLY VERIFY THE LOCAT70N AND CONDITION OF THE DRILLED PIPELINE.
19. 774E CONTRACTOR SHALL PLOT THE ACTUAL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL ALIGNMENT OF THE PILOT
rrs D6PP6R t SIRlIZP
n+c t�IcaaETm
°" ]�PCRn. gRK9"E'oz
^.it coRmRu. Kc, zmzs
ICLtaT:l t'-otu
INp1E ro/-TIR-2426
DESIGNED BY: ,1A5
DRAWN BY: ,1Y5
CHECKED BY: DAw
RK&K COM. N0, BM -100 DATE
PIEDMONT NATURAL CAS WE NO. 31 2�tg�11
GALE` NTS
BORE AT INTERVALS NOT EXCEEDING 20 FEET
20. THIS AS -BUILT" PLAN AND PROFILE SHALL BE UPDATED AS THE PILOT BORE lS ADVANCED.
21 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GRANT THE OWNER ACCESS TO ALL DATA READOUT PERTAINING TO
THE POSITION AND INCLINA77ON OF THE BOREHEAD. WHEN REQUESTED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
PROVIDE EXPLANAT70NS OF HIS POSITION MONITORING AND STEERING EQUIPMENT
P i e d m o n t
22. 774E ACTUAL PILOT HOLE EXIT POINT SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN TWO (2) FEET LATERALLY OF THE EXIT POINT
SHOWN ON 774E DRAWINGS. LONGITUDINALLY THE ACTUAL EXIT POINT SHALL BE NO MORE THAN FIVE
Natural G a s
(5) FEET SHORT OR FIVE (5) FEET PAST THE EXIT POINT SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.
SHEET DESCRIPTION
GENERAL NOTES
DuwlNc: PNG-VS-NOTES REvsioN: 0
v':

R.O.W. AND PROPERTY NCDOT US 17 LESLIE AND DANA WOODCOCK REFERENCE SECTION
LINE STATIONS STREETS FERRY ROAD (SR 1440) MAIN ST. DB 2851 PG 880
(60' R/W ) (55' R/W) PID 1-V-06-037 TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION PROVIDED BY CRAVEN
1 ' ,14 ' COUNTY N.C.. CIS DEPARTMENT - 8/9/10
\ I, - 7 ? _V *�a ..a, TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION PROVIDED BY McKIM & CREED
\ I
ENGINEERS, PLANNERS, SURVEYORS — 9/29/10
li A
I / - � GEOTECH INFORMATION PRO- DED BY S&ME,
-_ate-- _ JOB NO. - 1581-10-107'0;-
,tinL• I F�
a�
\ 6 rq ism p
IL
4 ,—���' LEG.END. .
BRIDGE
3 TOP ELEV=13.04
S v ®'1 0+00 I 11+00 •i 12+00 1�1 \ ' T +Op
p _
Topsoil
\ �
B " � � r +�� �) —�� � ® � � SC SM Clayey Sand
wRr .r STA 9+75 2 ' g 2d / " kf Z SC/SM, 7 1
/ / \ PIPE POINT
DE`E� T ^ / o
a SM, Silty Sand
N 587588.7 w A' A 14 HDD POIN
i \ E 2552120.4 w^ n� z °TT ert s y TEi1/P•
\ \ 14 PP -HDD FACE RIG SIDE
ff Poorly—graded
raded
N 5552 .B I Sand with Silt 9
�/�J/`� \ \ \\ \ \ o / j �� ^ •�c��"" E 5 74.1
a
XXX
If
>00< Fill
__j a Sandy Clay
SC, Clayey Sand
30
^�� fY.iS iiNG
20
10
0
—10
-20
-30
_40
_50
-60
DAMW ELEF
_:_?v 00
Silty Clay
NOTE
COMPOUND SIDE BEND AND SAG BEND AT STA 15+58
COMPOUND RADIUS - 982'
COMPOUND ANGLE - 18.8-
NT 1S'
9'
10+00 11+00
12+00 13+DO 14+00
CONTROL POINT
STATION
DEPTH
STA P11+106
36'
STA P13+58
21'
PRELIMINARY
ISSUED FOR INFORMATION
EROSION & SEDIMENTATION
NTS
-�
SF
STA 14+32
'ice
�_■����Q�■��aE.
SUMMARY OF MATERIALS
TEMO QUANTITY DESCRIPTION
NOTES
1. BASE DRAWING IS DERIVED FROM EXISTING MAP AND DRAWING INFORMATION AS INDICATED IN THE REFERENCE SECTION.
THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION IS NOT GUARANTEED. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY CONDITIONS AND UTIUTY LOCATIONS
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
2. COORDINATE LOCATIONS ARE BASED ON N.C.G.S.. NAD 83.
3. CALCULATED APPROX. PULLBACK LOAD ON PRODUCT PIPE IS 4600 LBF.
REVISIONS
REV. DESIG DRAFT CHECK DESCRIPTION I
APPROVAL
PERMITS BIO CONSTRUCTION
INITIALS DATS DAT
E INITIAS DATE INMAE
DRAFTING & DESIGN - RK&K
INTERNAL REVIEW — RK&K
ENGINEERING — RK&K
PIEDMONT NATURAL CAS
PROJECT
PROJECT-
NSRR AND CREEKS - VANCEBORO
HDD
Piedmont
Natural Gas
470 LF 4' PE PIPE. MEDIUM DENSITY, SDR 11.5
_M[1!hl�
!MIMMIwioo
IMM
SHEET DESCRIPTION
PLAN & PROFILE SHEET
SWIFT CREEK CROSSING
STA 9+75 TO STA 14+32
I
��/��� a �
''._s)� uC '�
i� umisf F nl It
>—„�_z„4
SCALE
p�N 1 = 100
PROFILE
N
0 JAS JAS DAW ISSUED FOR PERMITTING. 2/16/11 TEST DATA
TESTED FROM STATION: TO STATION:
MEDIUM: RECORD TEST PRESSURE: psig
PI�EDMONTK GOMNATURAL GAS AFE N0. 31VERT
HOR. 1 = 100'
. , • 40'
DRAWING: PNO-VBREVISION: 0
�
�I���-0111
IM_�m
Silty Clay
NOTE
COMPOUND SIDE BEND AND SAG BEND AT STA 15+58
COMPOUND RADIUS - 982'
COMPOUND ANGLE - 18.8-
NT 1S'
9'
10+00 11+00
12+00 13+DO 14+00
CONTROL POINT
STATION
DEPTH
STA P11+106
36'
STA P13+58
21'
PRELIMINARY
ISSUED FOR INFORMATION
EROSION & SEDIMENTATION
NTS
SF
9+75
SF
STA 14+32
PURPOSES ONLY
SUMMARY OF MATERIALS
TEMO QUANTITY DESCRIPTION
NOTES
1. BASE DRAWING IS DERIVED FROM EXISTING MAP AND DRAWING INFORMATION AS INDICATED IN THE REFERENCE SECTION.
THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION IS NOT GUARANTEED. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY CONDITIONS AND UTIUTY LOCATIONS
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
2. COORDINATE LOCATIONS ARE BASED ON N.C.G.S.. NAD 83.
3. CALCULATED APPROX. PULLBACK LOAD ON PRODUCT PIPE IS 4600 LBF.
REVISIONS
REV. DESIG DRAFT CHECK DESCRIPTION I
APPROVAL
PERMITS BIO CONSTRUCTION
INITIALS DATS DAT
E INITIAS DATE INMAE
DRAFTING & DESIGN - RK&K
INTERNAL REVIEW — RK&K
ENGINEERING — RK&K
PIEDMONT NATURAL CAS
PROJECT
PROJECT-
NSRR AND CREEKS - VANCEBORO
HDD
Piedmont
Natural Gas
470 LF 4' PE PIPE. MEDIUM DENSITY, SDR 11.5
ALIGNMENT SHEET
SHEET DESCRIPTION
PLAN & PROFILE SHEET
SWIFT CREEK CROSSING
STA 9+75 TO STA 14+32
I
��/��� a �
''._s)� uC '�
i� umisf F nl It
>—„�_z„4
SCALE
p�N 1 = 100
PROFILE
0 JAS JAS DAW ISSUED FOR PERMITTING. 2/16/11 TEST DATA
TESTED FROM STATION: TO STATION:
MEDIUM: RECORD TEST PRESSURE: psig
PI�EDMONTK GOMNATURAL GAS AFE N0. 31VERT
HOR. 1 = 100'
. , • 40'
DRAWING: PNO-VBREVISION: 0
�

A
.
I.G. AND PROPERTY
TOWN OF VANCEBORO
VANCEBORO
VANCEBORO
NORFOLK SOUTHERN
TOWN OF VANCEBORO
REFERENCE SECTION
LINE STATIONS
FARMLIFE AVENUE
MOORE
ST.
FARMUFE AVENUE
RAILROAD
FARMLIFE AVENUE
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION PROVIDED BY CRAVEN
(60' R/W)
(60' R/W)
(60' R/W)
(100' R/W)
(60' R/W)
COUNTY N.C., CIS DEPARTMENT - 8/9/10
e
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION PROVIDED BY MCKIM & CREED
p
A
mp;
$j7 101NOE
LDTs x-] DLDIX Ia gl
PER +eE Pc eos , CMa>r Eul aushu
PDI VI
F
ENGINEERS, PLAN N _ RVEYDRS - 9/29/10
,PROVIDED
GEOTECH INFOR BY S&ME,
JOB N0. - 1581F'_ X107 70/8/2070
1
t -V -0]-0E] DB IME Po ]e3 �-
— F
I
I
INSTALL IPELINE I„ a
JSSING
I
LOCATI MARKER N
I
I 4
A
I
(SEE SHEET DO01) I 4�8-1007 \ II
a,
1 oe IEEI PD 191
AT�x vPBai-0aa °>
�.�/�j'
f
uxs •. eul-
eDi. I
H D P01 T i/�
I I I I HDD POINT
SING
��
I
LEGEND,
RIC SIDE ,
PIPE SDE 5
I
N ,57057 8
PR
I I N 570888.5 a
" " ""
m' rvauc M
_ -
— —
`15
E 5 7.2 .". u e ".E .
E 2552548.7
I E. a .. R .P_ _ __—
L—aW—W
_
-/M— -
ii-
1 _ - -
—
b
"I -a-�_—_ • • • ------A----•----n
Topsoil—"
TCP
4
�
F E A�"
AVON -HDD
END PROJE C
80' Ry/W)
GoR/W) 10+00
II+DD
SC/SM, Clayey Sand
---------p--
w•(
—R _ _
— — — —
—
re
IW`— —
R/N— —
I — /wy
--
tF I
R / +0 ) m —�Ia
G AR I �I� +o Io'I
I 1 j z
r
i
r
I
,
SM, Silty Sand
I
Iol
i
I_ 100' TEMP.
x 'I SPACE I
I I F S 8 STA 13+19
;; \ q 58PP -HDD
I
1P��0� '�
q
I
SP/SM, Poorly -graded
I Sand with Silt
3 4
I 8 —WORK SPACE
pIP
XXX
STA 12+34
fIII
BEGIN
PROJE Po°t �vuaPCwa]o
L T
INSTALL PIPELINEPO I
z*
PIoDe/ e1 -xVA -P0o> -+eODt E �6
I
II
5
Ii
LOCATION MARKER
roT+�E
(SEE SHEET D001) x-] 14
Sandy
ndY Clayi
i I
16
> aM�P
i
SC, Clayey Sand
200 135•
51— 51—
Silty Clay
SP, Poorly -graded
Sand
I�
IJ OO T z d
W
Ory
sD
E STINGRADE
2 Q II
EXI ING uE I A MAN
HE MARKE
NOTES (CONTINUED)
ELECTTRIC
40
HDD POINT 12'
CAS MAIN
LINE MA KER UN NOWN y0 AW HDD POINT 10'
APPROVED AMERICAN RAILWAY ENGINEERING AND MAINTENANCE
OF WAY ASSOCIATION SPECIFICATIONS. FOR PIPELINES CONVEYING
30 RIG SIDE
PIPE SIDE
FLAMMABLE AND NON-FLAMMABLE SUBSTANCES.
IT-
6. BLASTING IS NOT PERMITTED.
—I� — — — — — — — — — —
—
7. PIPEUNES CARRING FLAMMABLE AND NONFLAMMABLE GAS
20 — — —
u 9
PRODUCTS SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF
THE CURRENT ANSI B 31,8 GAS TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION
STA 9+51
22
PIPING SYSTEMS.
10 START OFL4
FWQ OF
PROJECT7ZD
FROJECT
D LENGTH - 7.7
PC 12' G BEND
s PC 10' s PT
-10KAL)IUZS
SA BEND
CURVATU E 400'
LENGTH
i.' Iz 69.8' �.' 1
LENGTH 83.8'
-zD
12 RADIUS CURVATURE - 500'
50x 1e LENGTH - 87.3'
nary ELEV PT
a a sG
-.40.00
w mt• Hj
a� r� N„f Nd +n Y
9+00 10+DO
11+00 12+00 13+00 14+DO
CONTROL POINT
CP #1 CP p2 CP #3 CP p4 CP #5
PRELIMINARY
STATION
STA 10+00 STA 10+40
STA 10+83 STA 11+73 STA 12+60
ISSUED FOR PERMITTING
DEPTH
12' 18'
21' 22' 13'
PURPOSES ONLY
EROSION & SEDIMENTATION
SF SF
NTS
STA 9+73
STA 13+09
TEMj QUANTITY
SUMMARY OF MATERIALS
DESCRIPTION
NOTES APPROVAL
1. BASE DRAWING IS DERIVED FROM EXISTING MAP AND DRAWING INFORMATION AS INDICATED IN THE REFERENCE SECTION. PERMITS BID consrRucnoN
THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION IS NOT GUARANTEED. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION' INITIALS DATE INITIALS LATE INDALS DATE
2. COORDINATE LOCATIONS ARE BASED D N.C.C. S., NAD 83.
3. CALCULATED OCATIO. PULLBACK LOAD N. PRODUCT PIPE IS 3508 LBF. DRAFTING & DESIGN - RK&K
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW ALL REGUIREMENTS OF NORLFOLK SOUTHERN NSCE-8 SPECIFICATIONS. INTERNAL REVIEW - RK&K
5. PIPELINE AND GROSSING SHOULD BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAST APPROVED AMERICAN ENGINEERING - RK&K
CONTINUED AT RIGH
REVISIONS PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
REV. DESIG DRAFT CHECK DESCRIPTION DATE
PROJECT
PROJECT
NSRR AND CREEKS • VANCEBORO
HDD
Piedmont
Natural Gas
1 370 LF 4- STEEL PIPE, W.T. 0.188, X42
DUAL COATED 12 MILS t2 FBE AND 20 MILS t2
PoWERCRETE
3 2 EA. 4� PE VALVE
4 2 EA 4- ST, x 4- PE TRANSITION FITTING
ALIGNMENT SHEET
SHEEP DESCRIPTION
PLAN & PROFILE SHEET
NSRR CROSSING
STA 9+53 TO STA 13+24
5 2 FA CP TEST STATION SEE DETAIL, SHEET D003
6 2 FA. CP ANODE, 34 IN (SEE DETAIL, SHEET D003)
D .& K
RUXat&n[x
E"s OMRPI �' ID K surc 102
ff i ��oliE°'�
PIDNL ]Dh]E2-x42E
SCALE
PUN 1" = 100
PROFILE
0 WRN WRN DAW ISSUED FOR PERMITTING. 2/18/11
TEST DATA
MEDIUM; RECORD TEST PRESSURE: peig
44-=, ITESTED FROM STATION: TO STATION:
RK&K COM. N0. 809-100
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS AFE NO. 31
HON. i = 100'
VERT. 1" = 40*
DRAWING: PNG-VB-003 REVISION: D

REFERENCE SECTION
LID TO BE LABELED
"GAS"
GAS
FLUSH WITH l
GRADE +
COMPACTED SOIL TRACER WIRE TO REMAIN
CONTINUOUS IN TEST BOX.
COIL 24' MIN. OF SLACK IN TEST BOX.
MAINTAIN OF PLASTIC VALVE BOX (SCREW TYPE)WARNING TAPE AROUND WITH CAST IRON COVER 30 MIN.
TAPEAROUND
VALVE BOX
18
venae aan ar Yw mw TRACER WIRE
CAS MAIN
WARNING
TAPE
PE GAS VALVE CONCRETE OR WOOD BLOCK
BEARING ON UNDISTURBED SOIL
OR SOIL COMPACTED TO 95 : DENSITY.
NOTE:
WHEN VALVE AND LOCATING STATION ARE CALLED OUT AT ONE STATION
THE VALVE BOX IS ALSO USED AS THE LOCATING STATION.
VALVE BOX DIETAIL
WARNING
GAS
PIPELINE
PHONE
i,7A27-5323
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
Ill CORP ATE NEW BERN. N.C. �
E%ISTNC GRADE
LINE MARKER
LOCATIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS BEFORE INSTALLATION
LINE MARKER (SIGN) DETAIL
REVISION SECTION
DATE REV. DESCRIPTION 0Y
2/18/11 0 ISSUED FOR PERMITTING DAW
TEST DATA
LOCATION:
DOTE: DURATION:
PRESSURE:
CONTRACTOR: WITNESS:
NOTES
E�-
0-ecteV �L1�
AM
TFEB 2 J 2011 ..
ii 11 �� �p,+����.�tJ7ry,}N-�f�,
`IPP' �PdDtinl�jV ®�
PRELIMINARY
ISSUED FOR PERMITTING
PURPOSES ONLY
MATERIALS UST
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY.
nuc R KAIM LLP
5+s a+.ncN n. uoarN wn[ loz
coucam, Kc.. zeou
UCET5E F-oIu
vRolc ia-iaz-z+ze
DESIGNED BY: . S
DRAWN BY: ,14s
CHECKED BY: DAw
RKLLK COM. N0. 809-t00 GATE
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS AFE N0. 312/18/11`
NTS
r6111Piedmont
Natural Gas
SHEET DESCRIPTION
MISCELLANEOUS PE DETAILS
DRAWING: PNG-VB-DO01 REV SIGN: Q

t
REFERENCE SECTION
- SILT FENCE (DENR 5.E2) O SEED AND MULCH O
ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITION OR BETTER.
REVISION SECTION
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO:
1. PREPARATION OF THE GROUND: FINE GRADE ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO THEIR
MAKID11111M ORIGINAL CONTOURS. INSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE IF NEEDED AND REMOVE
MA RI IS 1. INSPECT SEDIMENT FENCES AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL MAKE ANY ALL ROCKS AND DEBRIS.
1. USE A SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRIC OF AT LEAST 95X BY WEIGHT OF POLYOLEFINS DR REQUIRED REPAIRS IMMEDIATELY. 2. DISTRIBUTE FERTILIZERS: NEEDED AND MIX WIADD THE FOLLOWING FERTILIZERS TO THE GROUND AS
THE SOIL TO A DEPTH OF 4 TO 6 BY DISKING
POLYESTER, WHICH IS CERTIFIED BY THE MANUFACTURE OR SUPPLIER AS CONFORMING TO OR OTHER APPROVED METHOD.
THE REQUIREMENTS IN ASTM D 6461, WHICH IS SHOWN IN PART IN TABLE 6.62b. 2. SHOULD THE FABRIC OF A SEDIMENT FENCE COLLAPSE, TEAR, DECOMPOSE OR BECOME A. GROUND AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE (FINE) 2 t -/.-
ons/ocreSP IFIATION FOR SEDIMENT FENCE FABRIC INEFFECTIVE. REPLACE IT PROMPTLY. B.10-10-10 800 Ibs/acre
SPECIFICATIONS
TEST MATERIAL UNITS SUPPORTED' UN -SUPPORTED' TYPE OF 3. REMOVE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORAGE VOLUME 3. SEED MIXTURE: DISTRIBUTE SEED AS DESCRIBED BELOW:
SILT FENCE SILT FENCE VALUE FOR THE NEXT RAIN AND TO REDUCE PRESSURE ON THE FENCE. TAKE CARE TO AVOID A. AUGUST 16 TO APRIL 30
UNDERMINING THE FENCE DURING CLEANOUT. KEN NCKY 31 FESCUE 60 IDs/acre
GRAB STRENGTH ASTM D 4632 N (Ib..) RYE GRAIN 40 Ibs/acr
DATE REV. DESCRIPTION Y
;TH
2 1811 0 ISSUED FOR PERMITTING DAW
MACHINE DIRECTION 400 550 MARV 4. REMOVE ALL FENCING MATERIALS AND UNSTABLE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AND BRING THE SERICEA LESPEDEZA 20 Ibs/acr
(90) (9)) AREA TO GRADE AND STABILIZE 1T AFTER THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN KOBE LESPEDEZA 10 Ibs/ocre
X -MACHINE 400 45D MARV PROPERLY STABILIZED. B. MAY 1 TO AUGUST 15
(90) (90) KENTUCKY 31 FESCUE 80 ft/. -
PERMITTIVITY ASTM D 4491ec-I 0.05 0.05 MARV SERICEA LESPEDEZA 20 Ibs/acre
APPARENT OPINING SIZES ASTM D 4751 smm 0.60 0.60 MAX. ARV4 RYE GRAIN 15 Ibs/oae
(US SIEVE II) (30) (30) GERMAN MILLET 15 Ibs/oae
X ]OX AFTER ]OX AFTER 4. MULCH: MULCH THE ENTIRE ARE WITH A DRY STRAW (PREFERABLY WHEAT)
ULTRAVIOLET STABILITY ASTM 0 4355 RETAINED SOON OF SOON OF TYPICAL FREE OF NOXIOUS WEEDS. MULCH SHALL NOT BE MUSTY. MOLDY. CAKED.
STRENGTH EXPOSURE EXPOSURE DECAYED OR DUST AND SHALL BE REASONABLY BRIGHT IN COLOR. WHERE
TEST DATA
LOCATION:
DATE: DURATION:
PRESSURE:
SILT FENCE SUPPORT SHALL CONSIST OF 14 CAGE STEEL WIRE WITH A MESH SPACING OF NEED, TACK MULCH WITH AN EMULSIFIED ASPHALT AT THE RATE OF
150 mm (6 INCHES). OR PREFABRICATED POYLMER MESH OF EQUIVALENT STRENGTH. 0.10 CAL/SO. YD. OR 10 CAL. PER 1,000 SQ. FT. RYE GRAIN IS
THESE DEACCEPTABLE AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR TACKING WHERE APPROVED FROM
FAULT VALUES ARE BASED ON EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE WITH A VARIETY OF SEDIMENT. 8' MAX. STANDARD STRENGTH FABRIC WITH WIRE FENCE
FOR ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS, A REVIEW OF PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE AND/OR SITE OR STEEL POST AUGUST 16 TO NOVEMBER 1 WHEN AN ADDITIONAL IS LBS/ACRE IS
REGIONALLY SPEGFlC GEOTEKnLE TESTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH TEST METHOD D 5141 SHOULD 6' MAX. EXTRA STRENGTH FABRIC WITHOUT WIRE FENCE APPLIED PRIOR TO THE APPLICATION OF MULCH.
BE PERFORMED BY THE AGENCY TO CONFIRM SUITABILITY OF THESE REQUIRMENTS. 5. SEED AND MULCH SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS FOLLOWING
AS MEASURED IN ACCORDANCE WITH TEST METHOD 0 4632. NORE FENCE COMPLETION OF PIPE INSTALLATION.
CONTRACTOR: WITNESS:
NOTES
2. SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRIC SHALL CONTAIN ULTRAVIOLET RAY
INHIBITORS AND STABILIZERS TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 6 MONTHS OF
EXPECTED U�ABLE CONSTRUCTION UFE AT A TEMPERATURE RANGE OF
O F TO 12 F.
PLASTIC OR
(:�
�l {VAI
ACEIs .E®
3. IF STEEL POSTS (STANDARD 'M SECTION) ARE UTILIZED FOR ALT WIRE TES
E
T HAVE
FENCE CONSTRUCTION, THEY MUST HAVE NI MINIMUM WEIGHT OF 1.33 POUNDS
PER LINEAR FOOT AND SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM LENGTH OF 5 FEET AND 75_24•
SHALL HAVE PROJECTIONS FOR FASTENING FABRIC.
NATURAL
[:� 2
FEB
4. WIRE FENCE REINFORCEMENT FOR SILT FENCES USING STANDARD -STRENGTH GROUND
FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE A MINIMUM 14 GAUGE AND SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM
MESH SPACING OF 6 INCHES.
INSTALLATION
I. CONSTRUCT THE SEDIMENT BARRIER OF STANDARD STRENGTH OR EXTRA
STRENGTH SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRICS.
2. ENSURE THAT THE HEIGHT OF THE SEDIMENT FENCE DOES NOT EXCEED 24 INCHES 24
ABOVE T14E GROUND SURFACE. (HIGHER FENCES MAY IMPOUND VOLUMES OF WATER 8 DOWN h 4'
SUFFICENT TO COUSE FAILURE OF THE STRUCTURE). FORWARD ALONG
THE TRENCH
3. CONSTRUCT THE FILTER FABRIC FROM A CONTINUOUS ROLL CUT TO THE LENGTH
OF THE BARRIER TO AVOID JOINTS. WHEN JOINTS ARE NECESSARY. SECURELY FASTEN
THE FILTER CLOTH ONLY AT A SUPPORT POST WITH 4 FEET MINIMUM OVERLAP TO
THE NEXT POST.
19PUATM KUL W A >!LT iti =
4. SUPPORT STANDARD STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC BY WIRE MESH FASTENED SECURELY TO
THE UPSLOPE SIDE OF THE POSTS. EXTEND THE WIRE MESH SUPPORT TO THE BOTTOM
OFTHE TRENCH. FASTEN THE WIRE REINFORCEMENT, THEN FABRIC ON THE UPSLOPE SIDE
OF THE FENCE POST. WIRE OR PLASTIC ZIP TIES SHOULD HAVE MINIMUM 50 POUNDS
TENSILE STRENGTH.
5. MEN A WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE IS USED, SPACE POSTS A MAXIMUM OF 8 FEET FLOW FROM
APART. SUPPORT POSTS SHOULD BE DRIVEN SECURELY INTO THE GROUND A MINIMUM DI R AR A
OF 24 INCHES.
FILTER FABRIC STEEL POST
6. EXTRA STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC WITH 6 FEET POST SPACING DOES NOT REWIRE WARE NATURAL GROUND
MESH SUPPORT FENCE. SECURELY FASTEN THE FILTER FABRIC DIRECTLY TO POSTS.
WIRE OR PLASTIC ZIP TES SHOULD HAVE MINIMUM 50 POUNDS TENSILE STRENGTH.
B MIN.
�T- --
7. EXCAVATE A TRENCH APPROXIMATELY 4 INCHES WIDE AND 8 INCHES DEEP ALONG BACKFILL TRENCH
�� AND COMPACT
THE PROPOSED UNE OF POSTS AND UPSLOPE FROM THE BARRIER. 2 ' THOROUGHLY
4.
8. PLACE 12 INCHES OF TIE FABRIC ALONG THE BOTTOM AND SIDE OF THE TRENCH. MIN.
/�
PRELIMINARY
9. BACKFILL THE TRENCH WITH SOIL PLACED OVER THE FILTER FABRIC AND COMPACT.
ISSUED FOR PERMITTING
THOROUGH COMPACTION OF THE BACKFILL IS CRITICAL TO SILT FENCE PERFORMANCE.
PURPOSES ONLY
10, DO NOT ATTACH FILTER FABRIC TO EXISTING TREES.
100 W A ERT IM
MATERIALS UST
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY.
RVrr6%1MATw 1HINEEKA11* LLP
cS
e45 tHHDRGN 6T. NLZ5 sY.41E tot
ucOM I F�-ott�u
PME 704-762-2426
DESIGNED BY: JS
DRAWN BY: AS
CHECKED BY: PAW
RK&K COM. NO. BD9-100 w'TE
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS AFE NO.31 2/18/11
SCALE-' NTS
Piedmont
Natural Gas
SHEET DESCRIPTON
EROSION & SEDIMENTATION
CONTROL DETAILS
DRAWING: PNG-VB-DO02 REV SION: 0

RKPVK
RECEINEV
f
FEB 2 1 2011
Morohoc.dCKVDC,
ATTACHMENT B: OWNER STATEMENTS, RETURN
RECEIPTS AND AUTHORIZED AGENT FORM

ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER STATEMENT���'���
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to Piedmont Natural Gas IS
V 1�
(Name of Property Owner)
proj ect A v e nLA a ✓�
XX located at Farm Life mei
(Lot, Block, Road, etc.)
f-�ur-l-le Y�' A rah c. h
Ott in Vanceboro N.C.
(Waterbody) (Town and/or County)
Applicant's phone #: [phone] Mailing Address: 111 Corporate Lane
New Bern, NC 28562
He has described to me, as shown below, the development he is proposing at that location, and, I
have no objections to his proposal.
DESCRIPTION AND/OR DRAWING OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT:
(To be filled in by property owner proposing development)
Please see the attached drawing. The applicant is proposing to install a
4 -inch naturgj. as ip 1pinet�within the Farm Life Road right-of-way and
beneath the & IQ' Ykn_`This notification is required as part of the Coastal
Area Management Act permit necessary for the project.
For questions regarding the project please contact Bill Snyder at the phone
number below or [e-mail]. RK&K are the engineers on the project and
are Piedmont Natural Gas' authorized agent.
(Information for Property Owner Applying
for Permit)
RK&K
845 Church St. N, Suite 104
Mailing Address
Concord, NC
City/State/Zip
(Riparian Property Owner Information)
Signature
13 I—c", for J0rd4n
Print or Type Name
704-782-2426 5
Telephone Nu Telephone Number
IZ /0 12-6S-�D
ignature a e Date
RK&K is an authorized agent for Piedmont Natural Gas.

ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER STATEMENTF
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to Piedmont Natural Gas
s €�
(Name of Property Owner)
project
XmWoft located at Streets Ferry Road and Main Street/Business US 17
(Lot, Block, Road, etc.)
on Swift Creek ,in Vanceboro N.C.
(Waterbody) (Town and/or County)
252-639-7225 111 Corporate Lane
Applicant's phone #: Mailing Address:
New Bern, NC 28562
He has described to me, as shown below, the development he is proposing at that location, and, I
have no objections to his proposal.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION AND/OR DRAWING OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT:
(To be filled in by property owner proposing development)
Please see the attached drawing. The applicant is proposing to install a
4 -inch natural gas pipeline within the Streets Ferry Road right-of-way and
beneath Swift Creek. This notification is required as part of the Coastal
Area Management Act permit necessary for the project.
For questions regarding the project please contact Bill Snyder at the phone
number below or [e-mail]. RK&K are the engineers on the project and
are Piedmont Natural Gas' authorized agent.
--------------------------------------------------------
(Information for Property Owner Applying
for Permit)
RK&K
845 Church St. N, Suite 104
Mailing Address
Concord, NC
City/State/Zip
•-------------------------------------------------------
(Riparian Property Owner Information)
Signature
Print or Type Name
704-782-2426
Telephone N tuber C' Telephone Number
Signature Date Date
RK&K is an authorized agent for Piedmont Natural Gas.

Zk0b OEC 01 2010
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER STATEMENT
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to Piedmont Natural Gas
(Name of Property Owner)
project
located at Streets Ferry Road and Main street/Business us 17
3yppoft
on Swift Creek
(Waterbody)
Applicant's phone #: [phone]
(Lot, Block, Road, etc.)
In Vanceboro
(Town and/or County)
Mailing Address:
111 Corporate Lane
New Bern, NC 28562
Fs % 2 20
h�
N.C.
He has described to me, as shown below, the development he is proposing at that location, and, I
have no objections to his proposal.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION AND/OR DRAWING OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT:
(To be filled in by property owner proposing development)
Please see the attached drawing. The applicant is proposing to install a
4 -inch natural gas pipeline within the Streets Ferry Road right-of-way and
beneath Swift Creek. This notification is required as part of the Coastal
Area Management Act permit necessary for the project.
For questions regarding the project please contact Bill Snyder at the phone
number below or wsnyder®rkk.com. RK&K are the engineers on the project and
are Piedmont Natural Gas, authorized agent.
--------------------------------------------------------
(Information for Property Owner Applying
for Permit)
RK&K
845 Church St. N, Suite 104
Mailing Address
Concord, NC
City/State/Zip
704-782-2426
-------------------------------------- ---- -
(Riparian Property Owner I forma 'on)
/ /l �? /_�� Signature
Zr,.- tl�(z/( / z z14 1—��
Print or Type Name
Z — Z3&-, G Ori
Telephone N mber Telephone Number
0
Signature Date Date
RK&K is an authorized agent for Piedmont Natural Gas.
i
t.�',��

ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER STATEMENT
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to Piedmont Natural Gas
project
p�located at Mill Pond Road
on Mauls Swamp
(Waterbody)
Applicant's phone #: [phone]
(Name of Property Owner)
(Lot, Block, Road, etc.)
in
Vanceboro
(Town and/or County)
Mailing Address: Ill Corporate Lane
New Bern, NC 28562
N.C.
He has described to me, as shown below, the development he is proposing at that location, and, I
have no objections to his proposal.
DESCRIPTION AND/OR DRAWING OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT:
(To be filled in by property owner proposing development)
Please see the attached drawing. The applicant is proposing to install a
4 -inch natural gas pipeline within the Mill Pond Road right-of-way and
beneath Mauls Swamp. This notification is required as part of the Coastal
Area Management Act permit necessary for the project.
For questions regarding the project please contact Bill Snyder at the phone
number below or [e-mail]. RK&K are the engineers on the project and
are Piedmont Natural Gas' authorized agent.
(Information for Property Owner Applying
for Permit)
RK&K
845 Church St. N, Suite 104
Mailing Address
Concord, NC
City/State/Zip
(Riparian Property Owner Information)
Signature
'o A fV 4LrO J y //i'//
Print or Type Name
704-782-2426 5,� _ a yy_ a s& y
Telephone Numb��/2/
Telephone Number
1)-d _ /-o ecember al�2016
Signature Date Date
RK&K is an authorized agent for Piedmont Natural Gas.
FFA
201

201,
■ Complete Items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
Town of Vanceboro
Chad E. Braxton
P.O. Box 306
Vanceboro, NC 28586
A. Signat re �J Agent
X I — � Pry L % � ❑ Addressee
B. Received by i(Pri/1nted Name) C. Date of Delivery
ddress different from item 1? ❑ Yes I
;r delivery address below: ❑ No
e
C16rtified Mail ❑ F3cpress Mail
❑ Registered Retum Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number 7009 1680 0000 0888 0816
(Transfer from service label)
PS Form 381.1, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt
102595-02-M-154(

-ATVA
HCbENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor James H. Gregson, Director Dee Freeman, Secretary
Date le November 2010
Name of Property Owner Applying for Permit:
Piedmont Natural Gas, Inc.
Mailing Address:
111 Corporate Gane
New Bern, NC 28562
I certify that I have authorized (agent) Rummel, Klepper and Kahl, LLP
to act on my
behalf, for the purpose of applying for and obtaining all CAMA Permits necessary to
install or construct (activity) a 4 -inch natural gas pipeline beneath Swift Creek
--D6st,ROI„Streets Ferry Rd. and US 17/ Main St. in Vanceboro, NC
at (any-prepe.F.S..—__.._t )
Additional Locations:
Unnamed Creek crossing Farmlife Ave, in Vanceboro, NCI
Mauls swamp at Alligator Rd. in Vanceboro, NC,
This certification is valid thru (date) 31 January 2011
Ir
RCf–V*operty Owner Signature
400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead Clty, North Carollna 28557
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: www,nccoastalmanagemerit.net
An Equal Opporlunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer -60% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper
"keva)
PER 201

-AGUA fFER 2 ?Oil
NCDENR�������
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor James H. Gregson, Director Dee Freeman, Secretary
J 114du
Date + February 2011
Name of Property Owner Applying for Permit:
Piedmont Natural Gas, Inc.
Mailing Address:
111 Corporate Lane
New Bern, NC 28552
I certify that I have authorized (agent) Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP to act on my
behalf, for the purpose of applying for and obtaining all CAMA Permits necessary to
install or construct (activity) a 4 -inch natural gas pipeline beneath Swift Creek
NCDOT ROW
at(nxy4mVlocated at) Streets Ferry Rd. and US 17/Main St. in Vanceboro, NC
Additional Locations:
Unnamed creek crossing Farmlife Avenue in Vanceboro, NC;
Mauls Swamp at Mill Farm Rd. in Vanceboro, NC.
This cerlifiration is valid thru (date) 30 June 2011
U//
0vDpaKRF Owner Signature
Project
400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equal opportunity i Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

RK,%Kb
FEB 21 2�1�
ATTACHMENT C: USAGE PRE -CONSTRUCTION
NOTIFICATION FORM AND JURISDICTIONAL
INVESTIGATION REPORT

O�O� W ATFy
T
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
44"4)
2 a 2011
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
❑Section 404 Permit ®Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
® Yes ❑ No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
® Yes
❑ No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
® Yes
❑ No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Vanceboro Natural Gas Pipeline HDD
2b.
County:
Craven
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Vanceboro
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Piedmont Natural Gas, Inc.
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
N/A - Project is within NCDOT right-of-way.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
111 Corporate Lane
3e.
City, state, zip:
New Bern, NC 28562
3f.
Telephone no.:
252-639-7225
3g.
Fax no.:
252-638-4718
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

FEB 2 2019 '
4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
Mmehoptilnmee-
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
Same as Owner
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
5c.
Street address:
845 Church Street North, Suite 102
5d.
City, state, zip:.
Concord, NC 28025
5e.
Telephone no.:
704-782-2426
5f.
Fax no.:
704-782-2489
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

FEB 2 1 2011
B. Project Information and Prior Project HistoryPk�3�(�tf�(�
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1-046-069
Latitude: 35.296867 Longitude: -
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
77.149061
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
N/A acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Swift Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C; Sw, NSW
2c. River basin:
Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The current site conditions vary from wooded to suburban in nature. Land use is undeveloped woodlands to individual
residences and businesses.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
N/A
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
N/A
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the pipeline crossings is to add natural gas distribution capacity in Vanceboro.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed pipeline will be medium density polyethylene (MDPE), SDR 11.5, 4 -inch diameter pipe. The natural gas
pipeline will be installed beneath the water bodies by horizontal directional drilling (HDD) methods. No land disturbance
or construction activities will occur within the banks or adjacent wetlands of any water bodies. Additionally, the pipeline
will be located at depth of twenty-three feet beneath the bottom of Swift Creek and no drill entry or exit location will be
closer than 100 feet to any stream bank. Please refer to the attached plan sheets for the specific installation profiles at
each proposed crossing.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past.
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
El Preliminary E] Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: RK&K
Name (if known):
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
August 2010, See attached report.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
A North Carolina CAMA permit is being requested concurrenty with this notification.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain. -
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

RECEIVED
:.
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary M016mcdMO
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
El No
El DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
El No
El DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
E] No
❑DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
El No
[I DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments: No Impacts
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments: No Impacts
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

A
ACEIVED
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open wata�r,j9
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number -
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: No Impacts
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments: N/A
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse [I Tar -Pamlico El Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number -
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
re uired?
B1 ❑P❑T
F-1 Yes
❑ No
❑Yes
B2 ❑P❑T
❑ No
❑ Yes
B3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: No Impacts
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and MinimizationF''
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
N/A
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The proposed pipeline will be medium density polyethylene (MDPE), SDR 11.5, 4 -inch diameter pipe. The natural gas
pipeline will be installed beneath the water bodies by horizontal directional drilling (HDD) methods. No land disturbance or
construction activities will occur within the banks or adjacent wetlands of any water bodies. Additionally, the pipeline will be
located at depth of twenty-three feet beneath the bottom of Swift Creek and no drill entry or exit location will be closer than
100 feet to any stream bank. Please refer to the attached plan sheets for the specific installation profiles at each proposed
crossing.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
ElPayment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments.-
omments:5.
5.Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ FEB 1 20N r
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

A���,��
FER 9
E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)r
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: There is minimal disturbance associated
with the project and no impervious surfaces are being installed.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
N/A
❑ Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ 0 R
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
�Lb
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
MofohuGd(rI, Vne
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

G CEIVEri
Page 1 1 of 11
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes No
®
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
® Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
See attached report
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
See attached report
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
—T
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
-
0]Yes ®No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? See attached report
�J,IL-Llat-k S+Jyb�rL-
Z�iS �I
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent' ignature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 1 1 of 11
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F AN � Ar 'IS ar,4
FER 2 1 201, A# -.!
ATTACHMENT D: JURISDICTIONAL INVESTIGATION
REPORT

0*
Jurisdictional and Protected Species
Investigation Report
Vanceboro, North Carolina
August ?tlltt
Jurisdictional Investigation Report
Vanceboro, North Carolina
Piedmont Natural Gas
August 2010
INTRODUCTION
There are three study locations situated in Vanceboro, Craven County, North Carolina;
Streets Ferry Road Bridge over Swift Creek, Farmlife Avenue crossing of UT to Mauls
Swamp, and Mill Pond Road over Mauls Swamp. Piedmont Natural Gas proposes to
construct a directionally bored gas line beneath the jurisdictional resources at each of the
study locations (Figure 1).
BACKGROUND & EXISTING CONDITIONS
Prior to field investigations, the Craven County, NC Soil Survey was reviewed to identify
hydric soils within the study area. The Vanceboro, NC USGS 7.5 minute Quadrangle
map, US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetland Inventory (NWI) Map,
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM),
and aerial photography were reviewed to identify the location, extent, and types of
jurisdictional (wetlands and streams) found within the study area.
Topography: The topographic relief of the study area ranges from approximately 2 to
18 feet (NAVD83) (Figure 1). The topography in the study area is characterized as
floodplain and associated interstream divides, and is located within the central portion of
the Coastal Plain Physiographic Province.
Soils: The Craven County Soil Survey indicates that six soil units are present within the
study area; Altavista fine sandy loam (AaA), Craven silt loam (CrB), Lenoir silt loam
(Le), Masontown mucky fine sandy loam/Muckalee sandy loam (MM), Seabrook loamy
sand (Se), and Tarboro sand (TaB). Map unit MM soils are all hydric soils or have
hydric soils as a major component. Map units Le and Se contain inclusions of hydric
soils or have wet spots. Soil mapping for the study area is shown in Figure 2.
Wetlands and Waters of the United States: The National Wetland Inventory (NWI)
map for the study area indicates the presence of four wetland types; Palustrine, Forested,
Broad -Leaved Deciduous, Temporarily Flooded (PFO 1 A), Palustrine, Forested, Broad -
Leaved Deciduous, Seasonally Flooded (PFO I C) Palustrine, Forested, Deciduous,
Semipermanently Flooded (PF06F), and Riverine, Lower Perinnial, Unconsolidated
Bottom, Permanently Flooded (R2UBH), within the study area boundary (Figure 2).
1pkfte'
FEF 20,

Jurisdictional and Protected Species
Investigation Report
Vanceboro, North Carolina
August _YHO
Floodplains: According to Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) data the
study area is located within the floodway as well as the 100 -year and 500 -year floodplain
of Swift Creek and Mauls Swamp (Figure 3).
METHODOLOGY
An investigation to determine the potential presence of wetlands and waters of the United
States was conducted in accordance with the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation
Manual (Environmental Laboratory, 1987) using the routine on-site method and
supplemental guidance (Wetland Determination Data Form — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal
Plain Region) issued by the Corps. The manual outlines a three -parameter approach to
delineating wetlands. All three parameters (hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and
hydrology) must be evident for the area to be considered a jurisdictional wetland, unless
the site has been disturbed or is considered a problem area. Animal species observed
during the field surveys were identified by using the following: Martof et. al., 1980,
Potter et. al., 1980, Rohde et. al., 1994, Sibley 2001, and Webster 1985.
Hydrophytic Vegetation: Plant species in the study area were identified using
appropriate taxonomic keys and field guides (Weakley, 2005 draft and Radford et al
1968). The wetland indicator status for each species identified was determined from The
National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northeast (Region 1), (Reed,
1988). This publication assigns indicator statuses to the approximately 6,000 species of
plants that commonly occur in wetlands and uplands in the Northeastern United States.
A species assigned an indicator status of UPI, (Upland) almost always appears in an
upland habitat. A species assigned an indicator status of FACU (Facultative Upland)
typically appears in uplands two thirds of the time and in wetlands one third of the time.
A FAC (Facultative) indicator status is evidence that the subject plant is equally likely to
occur in wetlands or uplands. A species assigned an indicator status of FACW
(Facultative Wetland) will typically be found in wetlands about two thirds of the time,
while appearing in uplands about one third of the time. A species assigned an indicator
status of OBL (Obligate) is almost always found in wetlands. Greater than 50 percent
FAC, FACW, or OBL species must be present for the area to meet the hydrophytic
vegetation criteria of a Corps of Engineers jurisdictional wetland.
Hydrologic Indicators: Areas with evident characteristics of wetland hydrology are
those where the presence of water has an overriding influence on characteristics of
vegetation and soils due to anaerobic and reducing conditions. Indicators of wetland
hydrology include drainage patterns, drift lines, sediment deposition, watermarks, stream
gauge data and flood predictions, historic records, visual observation of saturated soils,
and visual observation of inundation. Presence of these indicators is necessary for the
area to meet the hydrology criteria of a Corps of Engineers jurisdictional wetland.
Hydric Soils: Indicators of hydric soils observed in the project area were noted during
the field investigation. Indicators of hydric soils include the presence of histosols
(organic soils), histic epipedons (a surface horizon of saturated organic rich soil), sulfidic
odor, reducing conditions, gleyed or low-chroma colors, concretions, and high organic
2

FEB 2 j, 99
Jurisdictional and ProtLctcd Specic> 2011
Vaneeboru, North Ca
Ansnst'_(Jlu
content or organic streaking in sandy soil. Hydric soils typically exhibit a matrix chroma
of one (1) or less in unmottled soils or matrix chroma of two (2) or less in mottled soils
immediately below the A horizon or ten inches (whichever is shallower) using Munsell
Soil Color Charts on non-sandy soils (X-Rite, 2000 revised). Indicators of hydric soils
are necessary for the area to meet the criteria of a Corps of Engineers jurisdictional
wetland.
RESULTS
The field investigation to determine the potential presence of wetlands and/or waters of
the United States, as well as, identify any potential impacts to federally protected species,
was conducted by Pete Stafford and Hal Bain (RKK staff members) on August 18, 2010.
Jurisdictional Areas
The wetland (swamp community, Figure 4a ) associated with Swift Creek at the Streets
Ferry Road Bridge crossing is dominated by Bald cypress (Taxodium distichum), Red
maple (Acer rubrum), Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), Overcup oak (Quercus lyrata),
Possumhaw (Viburnum midum), Sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis), Lizard's tail
(Saururus cernuus), and Poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans). This area exists in the
floodplain of Swift Creek.
The perennial stream (SA) associated with the crossing of Farmlife Avenue is a UT to
Mauls Swamp (Figure 4b). This top of bank to top of bank feature is primarily bounded
by lawns dominated by Centipede grass (Eremochloa sp.). Sunfish (Lepomis spp.),
Mosquito fish (Gambusia sp.), Damsel fly larvae (Suborder Zygoptera) and crayfish
(family Cambaridae) were evident in pools. The stream channel exhibits a well
developed/moderately stable bed and bank. Channel depth ranges from 3-6 feet and
channel width ranges from 2-4 feet. Water depth ranged from 3.0 inches in riffles to 16.0
inches in pools. Moderate/clear flow was present on August 18, 2010.
The Wetland (Cypress ponded community) associated with Mauls Swamp at the Mill
Pond Road crossing (Figure 4c) is dominated by Bald cypress (Taxodium distichum),
buttonbush (Cephalanthzts occidentalis), Wax myrtle (Morella cerifera), Jewelweed
(Impatiens capensis), False nettle (Boehmaria cylindrical), and Duckweed (Lemna
minor). Several aquatic turtles [Chrysemys spp. and Spotted turtle (Clemmys guttata)]
were present during the site visit. This area exists in the floodplain of Mauls Swamp and
1-5 feet of water covered this area on August 18, 2010.
Two (2) wetland boundaries (flags WA 1-12 and WB 1-10) were delineated within the
project study area (Table 1.0). One (1) stream feature (flags SA 1-12) was delineated in
the project study area. These jurisdictional boundaries were identified in the field using
pink/black stripe flagging, and wetland features (WA and WB) were located using hand
held GPS. Stream SA was not located with GPS as it is a distinct, top of bank to top of
bank, stream feature.
3

Junsdictional and Protected Spccied
{mestigation Rzprn1
Vanceboro, North Carolina
ALIgLISt 20ln
Table 1
* PF06F - Palustrine, Forested, Broadleaved Deciduous, Saturated
PF02F - Palustrine, Forested, Needle -Leaved Deciduous, Semipermanently Flooded
R2UBH - Riverine, Lower Perinnial, Unconsolidated Bottom, Permanently Flooded
FF-�IX011
Wetland floodplain feature WA is adjacent to and abutting Swift Creek. Soils exhibited
low chroma and mottles. Wetland hydrology indicators present at the site included; water
marks, water -stained leaves, high water table, saturation, drift deposits, and oxidized
rhizospheres on living roots. It appears that this wetland feature derives hydrological
input primarily from overbank flooding.
Wetland feature (WB) is part of the Mauls Swamp floodplain complex. Soils exhibited
low chroma and the presence of muck. Wetland hydrology indicators present at the site
included; water marks, surface water, high water table, saturation, aquatic fauna and
rhizospheres on living roots. It appears that this wetland feature derives hydrological
input primarily from overbank flooding.
No Impacts to jurisdictional surface waters or wetlands are anticipated as a result of
project construction.
Federally Protected Species
As of August 16, 2010 the USFWS lists 7 federally protected species for Craven County
(Table 2). A brief description of each species' habitat requirements follows, along with
the Biological Conclusion rendered based on survey results in the study area. Habitat
requirements for each species are based on the current best available information as per
referenced literature and USFWS correspondence. No Impacts to federally protected
species are anticipated as a result of project construction.
4
NWI Classification
Delineated
Flag
Area Designation
as determined in the
Areas
Field
Numbers
WA
Bottomland Hardwood
PF06F*, R2UBH*
1-12
WB
Cypress Swamp
PF02F
1-10
Perennial coastal plain
SA
stream
R2UBH
1-12
* PF06F - Palustrine, Forested, Broadleaved Deciduous, Saturated
PF02F - Palustrine, Forested, Needle -Leaved Deciduous, Semipermanently Flooded
R2UBH - Riverine, Lower Perinnial, Unconsolidated Bottom, Permanently Flooded
FF-�IX011
Wetland floodplain feature WA is adjacent to and abutting Swift Creek. Soils exhibited
low chroma and mottles. Wetland hydrology indicators present at the site included; water
marks, water -stained leaves, high water table, saturation, drift deposits, and oxidized
rhizospheres on living roots. It appears that this wetland feature derives hydrological
input primarily from overbank flooding.
Wetland feature (WB) is part of the Mauls Swamp floodplain complex. Soils exhibited
low chroma and the presence of muck. Wetland hydrology indicators present at the site
included; water marks, surface water, high water table, saturation, aquatic fauna and
rhizospheres on living roots. It appears that this wetland feature derives hydrological
input primarily from overbank flooding.
No Impacts to jurisdictional surface waters or wetlands are anticipated as a result of
project construction.
Federally Protected Species
As of August 16, 2010 the USFWS lists 7 federally protected species for Craven County
(Table 2). A brief description of each species' habitat requirements follows, along with
the Biological Conclusion rendered based on survey results in the study area. Habitat
requirements for each species are based on the current best available information as per
referenced literature and USFWS correspondence. No Impacts to federally protected
species are anticipated as a result of project construction.
4

Jurisdictional and Protccted Species
In�esti,ation RoRort
Vanceboro, North Carolina ���A���'i
AL11;W;1 _011 EH
AO
01p
Table 2. Federally protected species listed for Craven County.
Scientific Name
Common Name
Federal
Status
Habitat
Present
Biological
Conclusion
Aeschynomene virginica
Sensitive joint -vetch
T*
No
No Effect
Lysimachia asperulifolia
Rough -leafed loosestrife
E
No
No Effect
Alligator mississippiensis
American alligator
T (S/A)
Yes
Not Required
Dermochelys coriacea
Leatherback seaturtle
E
No
No Effect
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Bald eagle
BGPA
Yes
No Effect
Picoides borealis
Red -cockaded woodpecker
E
Yes
No Effect
Trichechus manatus
West Indian manatee
E
No
No Effect
E - Endangered
T - Threatened
T(S/A) - Threatened due to similarity of appearance
BGPA - Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
* Historic- the species was last observed in the county more than 50 years ago.
Bald eagle
A large raptor, the bald eagle has a wingspread of about 7 feet. Adults have a dark brown
body and wings, white head and tail, and a yellow beak. Juveniles are mostly brown with
white mottling on the body, tail, and undersides of wings. Adult plumage usually is
obtained by the 6th year. In flight, the bald eagle often soars or glides with the wings held
at a right angle to the body.
Habitat Description: The Bald Eagle prefers habitats near seacoasts, rivers, large lakes,
oceans, and other large bodies of open water with an abundance of fish. Studies
have shown a preference for bodies of water with a circumference greater than
11 km (7 mi), and lakes with an area greater than 10 square kilometers (4 sq mi)
are optimal for breeding bald eagles.
The Bald Eagle requires old-growth and mature stands of coniferous or hardwood
trees for perching, roosting, and nesting. Selected trees must have good visibility,
an open structure, and proximity to prey, but the height or species of tree is not as
important as an abundance of comparatively large trees surrounding the body of
water. Forests used for nesting should have a canopy cover of no more than 60
percent, and no less than 20 percent, and be in close proximity to water.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect. Large bodies of water, capable of supporting
foraging Bald eagles, are not present within 1 mile of the project study area. No impacts
to Bald eagles or its habitat will result from project construction.
Red -cockaded woodpecker
USFWS optimal survey window: year round; November -early March (optimal)

FEB 2011
.Jurisdictional and Protected Species I �JP�liAt7��Cf �(C�td�l
In\estigation Report
Vanceboro, North Carolina
August _'alit
Habitat Description: The red -cockaded woodpecker (RCW) typically occupies open,
mature stands of southern pines, particularly longleaf pine (Pinus palustris), for
foraging and nesting/roosting habitat. The RCW excavates cavities for nesting
and roosting in living pine trees, aged 60 years or older, and which are contiguous
with pine stands at least 30 years of age to provide foraging habitat. The foraging
range of the RCW is normally no more than 0.5 miles.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect. Habitat in the form of pine or pine dominated stands
does not exist in the project boundaries. No impacts to RCW or its habitat will result
from project construction.
[USFWS] United States Fish and Wildlife Service. Red -cockaded Woodpecker in North
Carolina. http://www.fws.gov/nc-es/birds/rcwood.html. (Accessed 02/18/08)
West Indian manatee
USFWS optimal survey window: year round
Habitat Description: Manatees have been observed in all the North Carolina coastal
counties. Manatees are found in canals, sluggish rivers, estuarine habitats, salt
water bays, and as far off shore as 3.7 miles. They utilize freshwater and marine
habitats at shallow depths of 5 to 20 feet. In the winter, between October and
April, manatees concentrate in areas with warm water. During other times of the
year habitats appropriate for the manatee are those with sufficient water depth, an
adequate food supply, and in proximity to freshwater. Manatees require a source
of freshwater to drink. Manatees are primarily herbivorous, feeding on any
aquatic vegetation present, but they may occasionally feed on fish.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect. Aquatic resources in the project study area are not of
sufficient size to support the West Indian Manatee. No impacts to the West Indian
Manatee will result from this project.
[USFWS] United States Fish and Wildlife Service. West Indian Manatees in North
Carolina. hgp://www.fws.gov/ne-es/mammaUmanatee.html. (Accessed 02/18/08)
American alligator
USFWS optimal survey window: year round (only warm days in winter)
Habitat Description: In North Carolina, alligators have been recorded in nearly every
coastal county, and many inland counties to the fall line. The alligator is found
rivers, streams, canals, lakes, swamps, and coastal marshes. Adult animals are
highly tolerant of salt water, but the young are apparently more sensitive, with
salinities greater than 5 parts per thousand considered harmful. The American
alligator remains on the protected species list due to its similarity in appearance to
the Endangered American crocodile.
Biological Conclusion: Species listed as threatened due to similarity of appearance do
not require Section 7 consultation with the USFWS.
[USFWS] United States Fish and Wildlife Service. American alligator (Alligator
mississippiensis)
htty://www.fws.gov/species/species accounts/bio alli.html. (Accessed 02/15/08)
C,

Jurisdictional and Protected Species
Ins estigation..Report
Vanceboro, North ('Wohrm ���46y�w�
August YM)
A#2011
Leatherback sea turtle
USFWS optimal survey window: April - August
Habitat Description: Leatherbacks are distributed world-wide in tropical waters of the
Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian oceans. They are generally open ocean species, and
may be common off the North Carolina coast during certain times of the year.
However, in northern waters leatherbacks are reported to enter into bays,
estuaries, and other inland bodies of water. Major nesting areas occur mainly in
tropical regions. In the United States, primary nesting areas are in Florida,
however nests are known from Georgia, South Carolina, and North Carolina as
well. Nesting occurs from April to August. Leatherbacks need sandy beaches
backed with vegetation in the proximity of deep water and generally with rough
seas. Beaches with a relatively steep slope are usually preferred.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect. Open ocean, estuaries, and large coastal water bodies
are not present in the project study area. This project will have no effect on the
Leatherback sea turtle.
[NOAA] National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Fisheries, Office of
Protected Resources. Leatherback Turtle (Dermochelys coriacea).
hqp://www.mufs.noaa.gov/pr/species/turtles/leatherback.htm. (Accessed on 02/18/08)
[USFWS] United States Fish and Wildlife Service. Leatherback Sea Turtles in North
Carolina. http://www.fws.gov/nc-es/reptile/leather.html. (Accessed 02/18/08)
Rough -leaf loosestrife
USFWS optimal survey window: mid May -June
Habitat Description: Rough -leaved loosestrife, endemic to the Coastal Plain and
Sandhills of North and South Carolina, generally occurs in the ecotones or edges
between longleaf pine uplands and pond pine pocosins in dense shrub and vine
growth on moist to seasonally saturated sands and on shallow organic soils
overlaying sand (spodosolic soils). Occurrences are found in such disturbed
habitats as roadside depressions, maintained power and utility line rights-of-way,
firebreaks, and trails. The species prefers full sunlight, is shade intolerant, and
requires areas of disturbance (e.g., clearing, mowing, periodic burning) where the
overstory is minimal. It can, however, persist vegetatively for many years in
overgrown, fire -suppressed areas. Blaney, Gilead, Johnston, Kalmia, Leon,
Mandarin, Murville, Torhunta, and Vaucluse are some of the soil series that
occurrences have been found on.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect. Habitat for Rough -leaf loosestrife does not exist in
the project study area. No impacts to Rough -leaf loosestrife will occur as a result
of project construction.
7

Jurisdictional and hotected Species
lmestigalion Report
Vanceboro, \on Caro l
A`I'�uct ?(11(10EIV V,
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Rough -leaf Loosestrife (Lysimachia FEB
asperidifolia). http//www.fws.gov/ne-es/plant/rllooses.html (Accessed: January 17, Z011
2008).
Sensitive joint -vetch
USFWS optimal survey window: mid July -October
Habitat Description: Sensitive joint -vetch grows in the mildly brackish intertidal zone
where plants are flooded twice daily. This annual legume prefers the marsh edge
at an elevation near the upper limit of tidal fluctuation, but can also be found in
swamps and on river banks. Sensitive joint -vetch normally occurs in areas with
high plant diversity where annual species predominate, and can grow in sand,
mud, gravel, or peat substrates. Bare to sparsely vegetated substrates appear to be
a microhabitat feature of critical importance to this plant. Such microhabitats
may include accreting point bars that have not yet been colonized by perennial
species, areas scoured out by ice, low swales within marshes, muskrat "eat outs"
where this rodent removes all of the vegetation within a small portion of the
marsh, storm damaged areas, and the saturated organic sediments of some interior
marshes that have local nutrient deficiencies. In North Carolina, stable
populations have been found in the estuarine meander zone of tidal rivers where
sediments transported from upriver settle out and extensive marshes are formed.
Additional North Carolina occurrences are also found in moist to wet roadside
ditches and moist fields, but these are not considered stable populations.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect. No tidally influenced estuarine habitat exists in the
project study area. No impacts to Sensitive joint -vetch will occur as a result of
project construction.
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2006. Optimal Survey Windows for North
Carolina's Federally Threatened and Endangered Plant Species. http://www.fws. og v/ne-
es/es/plant survey.html (Accessed: February 18, 2008).
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Sensitive Joint -vetch (Virginia Joint -vetch) in
North Carolina. http://www.fws.gov/nc-es/plant/sensiointv.html (Accessed: January 17,
2008).

X43 7: ♦
• •` Mill Pond Rd Site I �yf)rI
+( I r • .f j�1L
w IL
.s • • • :1 * i _ Jam_ _.-- __,y'/ _
cq
+ ' • s a cem
w •
Farmlife Ave Site " «` ♦ * ` _� �(� `�
Van ebOro163
• � .' „' • :, , �-� a� ; , , � 4,�
'�• • • '
♦•»'�• .' `" Streets Ferry Rd Site
_'�''� +'`', i' f _ _ • 1440
/. _ . r -�° t a • • ° �� Blest '�•�
0.-� =5001;000 2,000 3,000", 4,000��.--
_ Feet
FIGURE 1 Wetland August
RKAUSGS Quad Map Delineation 2010
Vanceboro, North Carolina
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Quadrangle, Vanceboro, NC 1 inch = 1,000 feet

FEB 2 1 2011

AD

RECEIVED,

Jurisdictional and protected Species
In\estiation Report
Vanceboro, North Carolina��`�
AIIQLISI 010
APPENDIX A
Federal and State
Jurisdictional Forms

�4.
RECEIVED
FEB 21 2011
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
'1 q �-¢
ProjecUSite: 57'rCCIL A" rrq 10, 6,Jq, LresS��g City/County: 1/1NChDA0 Cr•/F1vutJ Sampling Date: 0�
ApplicanUOwner. P.ed� t /f%�%r ¢�� �%! n� /� S State: I+�• C• Sampling Point: �%A
Investigator(s): &¢e _-u rp Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):r-/�141,<l Local relief (concave, convex, none): Cen7�A-PC Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): La t: -3 ,::'17 to & 5 t Long: —77, Iq 9 36 & Datum: N �J
tm�ay,-j rK �t iaswct�d lea
Soil Map Unit Name: 171AfeJ*sir- r`ar oZ c.(6 9
��,Up S�dJ��Iea.�. , WI c sitkation: PFQ A
i
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes & No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Ala Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 1- No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? V40 (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes V-- No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes t%. No
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes
Ile -'No within a Wetland? Yes D/'No
HYDROLOGY
.� Ate¢�7Yvr 5 pare 9e v
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: checkk,all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (Al)
--,-/ Water -Stained Leaves (89)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_/High Water Table (A2)_
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
&, Drainage Patterns (B10)
_V/�aturation (A3)
_ Marl Deposits (815) (LRR U)
_ Moss Trim Lines (816)
✓ Waler Marks (B1)�lydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—A/Sediment Deposits (82)
_Oxidized Rhizospheres an Living Roots (C3)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
rift Deposits (133)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mal or Crust (134)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial
Imagery (137) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Yes -'No r' Depth (inches): �6FJ C -
Water Table Present?
Yes V� No Depth (inches): g; D
Saturation Present?
Yesy/ No Depth (inches): S�r VAre
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks: tJie-,/,FW,4
btiq rl{d����lK m9c�ucA rv= S S%PO-w5 /� cif s�c/�%
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
2. A r;a d` rt` w (0 e,-
3. %i• L -,v- "e, f%A, to r -A-
4. L•c�u.t�R-�..idMr` 5'>�tor/e-cr�F/u_,�_
5. ! &
A11 G y 7. u a.r Gcx c /v rtiR A
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
abIL
F14 c
OCL
FktW-
Q la L_
= Total Cover
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: }
1. Ae-,w -.. b - v' FA- C
2. f r,A,to r h` ry ✓' F4G
3. Lr*�id!?x 6f* -Y S{t/✓�fCi i�c!Qt_ ✓ /�G t
4.
5.
6.
7.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size
1 . [3�6� t / i %D �t.1'Jt1 cA. w. d/ �ct-,•.,.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
�.
rpt rS
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1. 0.0eC/o'ci 5Bnl5rl?.//S
2. 54U rLt e ..s C e,,rA),.L K- �
3. P11A) I'?de1P;1t-
4. _ �- rQ . P�� 1� e. s i 4
5.
6. EIn kS rvvl�ti�dur� _ /eLi� �v/ru ear
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
r -tet)
= Total Cover
Sampling, Point:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species v
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheot:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
_Dominance Test is >50%
Prevalence Index is 53.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
ns
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
F/?Ce,eJ
�- Q L
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
O to L,
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
pcw
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
PACtrl -
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
- r--
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. %D�>Gar�e.Jolr�6.J t^.j.clir,fi'JS t� F�'L
(s, -2. C s� �f-� ,� • RlL
ry'oz? 3..t1; ii
f14 �5�iu�lr:s r F-G-
Vif,e 4. P*i1ayGdofar. 5 4ecsa/4ueFujt� F L
5 Hydrophytic
Vegetation
= Total Cover Present? Yes Y No
Remarks: (If observed, tis) morphological adaptations below).
04,4 -4 -ba. -i �¢rrr t� ^,--
g r.;A9*C e ! o a leC
US Army Corps of Engineers Atfanlic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version

SOIL
FEB 2 � 2011
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) '/a
Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
`�/ ld
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De tenon, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric SolIS3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (Ag) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
�oamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
� Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 1538)
— 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
, Redox Depressions (F8) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2) (LRR T, U)
___. 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P. T)
— Mar{ (F10) (LRR U) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
�_
— Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, 1J) wetland hydrology must be present.
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR O, S)
_ Della Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 160A, 1508)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Dupped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 163C, 153D)
ark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
�"
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks: Pee 'rre. {
50!/S,� �R��6cs <JUC�cGA'S D� cVL�ir[L �pIIS –
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Interim Version

Print Form
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 5f'r'er%f rY-rV F(d, o b1.4/No crF Circ City/County: IIAAr c A, 410i -n, C, -I e--1 Sampling Dated'
ApplicanUOwner: ,/�'f Slate: ld6, Sampling Point: (AJ I"
Investigator(s): f C ¢C 37 /'r /�i$ / 4+1-4) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): Pk-ad.4 111-rll;,2 Local relief oncave, convex, none): Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: i S- a2- 1'>e �% Long: f 77, Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: i1) f{ So AJ ttrW N YYf e,,e k -et% E NWI classification: _
o
Are climatic /hydrologic conditions an the site typical for this time of year? Yes M- No No ❑ (lf no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? R%O Are "Normal Circumstances" present?
Yes No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? 0/0 (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Yes 0
❑
No ©�
Is the Sampled Area
'
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes
❑
No
® f
within a Wetland? Yes El No �,
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
No
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Remarks: Al GOt7 j - /Paa9�
jd act.w a -!S Fl f/ •te-f-05 �rjone��0//�iU d ter it r
A -I IA-c"Co S /Ojo
/ A -d I
d,0<V ,v
�
f ll6CC�4 r/i(� .
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
L1 Surface Water (Al)
_❑ Water -Stained Leaves (Bg)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
Q High Water Table (A2)
Aquatic Aquatic Fauna (B13)❑t
Drainage Patterns (B10)
El Saturation (A3)
_u Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
D Moss Trim Lines (1316)
�] Water Marks (B1)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
�] Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
a Sediment Deposits (132)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living
Roots (C3) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (84)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils
(C6) D_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_❑ Shallow Aquitard (133)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
❑
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No
L'J epth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No
t% Depth (inches):
©/
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Tc
ct=lsp �J /r-/
-- c� e '�rr%.v cX �-� � f d iD � c1 , .0 d { L,t✓ rd'l S Ai. M a. !o s tiv
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Interim Version

FEES �
VEGETATION! - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling i t:
Absolute Dominant tndicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: } % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. PrNk S facg�0. ✓ ❑ F,+6 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.Lr�U+siFw_Igis s.✓rftr�rt�e._ s� ❑ G/
,T Total Number of Dominant r/
3. ❑ Species Across All Strata: Q (8)
4. ❑
Percent of Dominant Species o!
5. ❑ That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 /D (A/8)
6. ❑
7 ❑
Prevalence Index worksheet:
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
OBL species x 1 =
1. ❑
FACW species x 2 =
2. ❑
FAC species x 3 =
3, ❑
FACU species x 4 =
4. ❑
UPL species x 5 =
5, ❑
Column Totals: (A) (B)
6. ❑
Prevalence Index = B/A =
7 ❑
= Total Cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
/
4� Dominance Test is >50%
/
1. 4Z e- 'y'w(Q ! va •-- y ❑ F,4
_ Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2. AA -c tcA-V- > ,9 1,)V ✓ ❑ ,+A
3.
4- ❑
5. ❑
6. ❑
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7. ❑
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
= Total Cover
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1AIL
2 ED
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
3 ❑
4• ❑
5. ❑
Shrub -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
6. ❑
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
7. ❑
8 ❑
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
9. ❑
10. ❑
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
11. ❑
12. ❑
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot psize: ) f
1. ! �.Z • i O tiu�ci ✓ di✓ . scar, c iY�✓8 ✓ Eltr G
ffrG
3. ❑
4. ❑
Vegetation �
Present? Yes E rffNo El
5. ElHydrophytic
= Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). J
•ff-lojo 8;1-6
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version

SOIL
FEB 2 12011
Sampling Poi, g ' ✓w
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) /
Color (moist) % Type' Loc'
Texture Remarks
in — 5-!r>y r -5A
sy-</
s - /,La r• ``/y
/-P,.�!r s, -J
'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
�H�[Idric Soil Indicators:
`—'Histosol
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
(Al)
Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
n 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
0Histic Epipedon (A2)
TOPolyvalue
_[]Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
r'-1
L.1 Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
nDepleted Matrix (173)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
LJRedox Dark Surface (176)
(MLRA 15313)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
:C]Depleled Dark Surface (F7)
n Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (AB) (LRR U)
B
Redox Depressions (F8)
_❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (1`10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Q Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
'indicators
a Thick Dark Surface (Al2)Iron-Manganese
Masses (F12) (LRR O, P,
T) of hydrophytic vegetation and
Surface (1`13) (LRR P, T, U)
Q Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ]Delta
wetland hydrology must be present,
[] Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR O, S)
0 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—t—]Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1SOB)
unless disturbed or problematic -
Sandy Redox (S5)
��ffTL��—TTTtReduced
-EPiedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Q Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
L n
SO/lG d0 i✓.97'- /'JC��Ci
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Interim Version

RECEIVED
FEB 21 2011
M0f8he 1dQyyDCM
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY A,SSESSIVI)EN T WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: piPd au.,OVf /44W4-1 4-4� 2. Evaluator's name. --d-4.4 A'i�e
3. Date of evaluation:_ e,�[,!�"/0 4. Time of evaluation:!'o a'e. w...
5. Name of stream:_ tai t j' Cree- k' 6. River basin: op-, 1 15
7. Approximate drainage area: %• �! Wit. , ..1� s 8. Stream order: 3 �(
9. Length of reach evaluated: 150 f-&. 10. County: 6 rA-veal
11. Site coordinates (if known): tsprefe�r"intd^eciimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any).-
Latitude
ny): n, r� c3
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 3 5. aZ r zo Ca S7 / Longitude (ex. -77.556611): " / -/ • / 1 / -3,6b
Method location determined (circle): GPS She rtho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other AJW-
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying streams) location):
U,a-aJ
14. Proposed channel work (if any): lVo N C'
15. Recent weather conditions: S . Q Crh a! _ 3 ` .. SiNoJLtq , fF Y D. S.drQ �, ,t � J s,
16. Site conditions at time of visit:_
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section I0 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
^Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters _,Water Supply Watershed (I-fV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? S)NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: ? to . % Ac
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? '5 NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? t5NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: IS% Residential r' I % Commercial ✓ -% Industrial Jrrl % Agricultural ✓'o'
JL 511. Forested V� _% Cleared / Logged -% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 0 `h'© Pte. 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): A
24. Channel slope down center of stream:-
XFlat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>) 0%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends _Frequent meander `Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion_ Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Totalscore (from reverse): "f 1 Comments: C&a el%l 1J11,.,4)
Grr /'.csfiFdsfr bc�/da�K F1,,9,J tsv u�f�*,Vd su`{z... ,t�:c.,1,f�.,.
Evaluator's Signature /� A4..- Date r1/�`LU/O
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Continent, please call 919-876-844I x 26.

PECEIVEo
FEB 2 1. 2011
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
$ These characteristics :ue net assessed in coastal streams.
et�+++4%u.,�� �..t !P '1T'4�-.t �j `i "•( S l ( ]�'ta.� f -. t""��
ES iS
1 ,
i 4 7 ft'T .6'' L
y 1..
lfy
-1 f,� *�.t�.,4W�3+'�"�•'."� �H �Y�U�N Y
ta,4 '{ i1l\f,1
CDa.9tAit
- 1 (1�`LTi
+l � 7°ted otti
+'
lno
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0 5
0 4
0-5
flow or saturation = 0• strop flow = raax tats
j
Evidence offast"human 23terntion
eXtensive alteration = 0; no'alteration = max ints
t 3
Riparian tome . ;, ; »�+ ifs
no buffer. 0; Gond ous, wide buffer= max points).:
0
o
0'
-
y
I vldence ofnutrieat ar cbemarad discliaige� �''�`�
tC 47
..- _. 1 ...
dtSCh
(�
--. t] 5r
(
V -4
t,
+
extensiV CS - 0,110'dIsV, eS mast. tats _
Y
-
jo
—
5
no duck e = 0; s tin s, seeps, wetlands,etc .max rots
® 30
- 4.
i
Preserce of2djacent ifotidplaut
3 -
nn flood Iain= 0 exteasstve flood lain max rots
Entrenchment / Roodplaan access
!,
ite entrenched = 4 fre cent iIoodin = max rots : .
Presence cen:wwetteatrltdus s
+
.8
no weticutds -• t! la'ofidja
dm`
4 .,t
0 - 2
^
5
9
Channel sinuosity
0 5
0 - 4
4 - 3
extensive channelization = 0• natural meander = uzax inls
ip.
Sediment input..
0 5-:
0-4 0-.¢...-4
y
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment . max.
Size & diversity of chiamnel bed substrate
t = # `
4-
__
A//j�(
fine homogenous = 0 large, diverse sizes ts
x
Iz_l.20
Evidence of channel incision or vridemimg
`�deeely incised = 0 stable bed & banks-= max mts
i
S
0 4. ..
4.-5
Presence of major bank failures
I
13
severe erosion = 0• no erosion stable banks = maxpoints)
0 - $
0 - 5
0 - 5
5
iA
Root depth and density on banks _ .
no vlsable roots = 0 dense roots ihrou out =max oants
� p g.. -
0-4
0-5 -
?l
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
..
tl 5
0.-4 '
0-5
s�
stibstanLial impact �• no evidence = max rots
`J
j(no
.16 ..
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes _ . .
riffle -JA les or pools = 0• well-developed = max inLs)
Habitat complexity
0.=3..
0-5
0-6.
Z
_ ^
17
habitats =
0-6
0-6
0-6.
5
•
rmr:
n
little or no habitat = 0; fre uen varied max points)
Canopy coverage over strearmbed
lg
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = maxpoints)
0' 5
0-5
0-5
Al
" Substrate embeddedness
(de l embedded = 0; loose structure = max
r
_
11i 4
0-4
-4
`�i
20
Pence of streams invertebrates (see page 4)
res
= ints)
OL4
0-5
0-5
3
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types max
e
21
. ' . ,;.. presence of amphibians..:
(no evidence = 0; Gammon, numerous types = maxpoints)
0.- 4
Q— 4
0-4
22
Presence of fish
�.- 4
0-4
0 -
no evidence = 0; common numerous types = max points)
23
Evidence ofwildfife use
0 -.6
0-5
0 -
t�j
=-
no evidence = 0• abundant evidence = mar ints
2
®t$ PU1f1t9 I�o9Sible.,
-.i J: .. �t-.. , ..,.a
• - v-}}'�F :. "F
tir :1
t'
" V � l i 1 - f .. -; ..1 _ -..; .- �2:.41:�t!•-�- ��f�`Y{� \ ..+ � t 1 Q V L n, \ F -,..
L
$ These characteristics :ue net assessed in coastal streams.

D=EB 2U1'►
North Carolina Division of Water Quality- Stream Identification f=orm; Version 3.1
Date: mfr �-/'a o r o Pm)ect: �' e Get sera ��a-r Latitude: �.
Evaluator. 9 She: � Lon
Total Points: C-6 Other cJ logo,
Stream is at Least Intermittent 3d, 5 County: C rr�ru e
NZ 19 or rennfal ff z 30 g• Quad Name:
/A. Goomnrnhnlnrsv ic,,htntni_ IYn t f t.r__..
10. Continuous bed and bank
2. Sinuosity
- -
0
0
---
1
1
1-W91 ago
2
2
.717[l11!j
3
3
3. In -channel structure: riffle -pool sequence
0
W
(2
3
4. Soli texture or stream substrate sorting
0
1`
1 5
0 5
0
17. Sediment on )ants0
0.
2
3
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
19 Hydric soils (redoArnorphic featNn
8. Depositional bars or benches
0
1'
2
3
7. Bralded channel
0
1
2
3
S. Recent alluvia! deposits
0
1
2
3
9 ° Natural levees
0
1
1
3
10. Headcuts
0�
1
2
3
3
11: Grade controls
0
0.5�
1
1.5
12. Natural valley and drainageway
0
0.5
1
(1.53
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
f
-
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
No = 0
I
Yes - 3
evidence._
"Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav fit thtntAl - (?', -4 ,
14. Groundwater flow/dischargeglines)
0 1'
15. Water In channel and > 48 hrs
20 . Fibrous roots in channel
2
3
Water in channel - d --growing
0 1
2
` 3
16. Leaflitter
1 5
0 5
0
17. Sediment on )ants0
0.
1
0
(1.5.
18. Organic debris lines or piles (W0
0.5
1
1.5
19 Hydric soils (redoArnorphic featNn
- n
1
1.5
C. Biology Subtotal
20 . Fibrous roots in channel
3
2)
1
21 . Rooted plants in channel
3
2
1
0
22. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
0
(1.5.
23. Bivalves
0
1
2
3
24. Fish
0
0.5
1
C1.5
25. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
0.5
1
27. Rlamentous algae; periphyton
0.5
1
1.5
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus.
0
0.5
1
1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed
_
FAC - 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5J SAV
1.5
= 2.0; Other= 0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item
29 focuses on the presence of
aquatic or wetland
plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
ct,s r7
'�'"`d� ✓" �t c�j free ,v r
j wc%r
� 5n 1 wCf%
J
t

USACE AID#,
DWQ 4 Site # (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
F", -r-,04 - L, -Pe flet _ tJ +-Ai c e !e cr r a
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: lied -& 442%4 vyl 674--< 2. Evaluator's name: etc :5t- ;J,
3. Date of evaluation:�4. Time of evaluation:_ d :0 67 p• �. .
5. Name of stream:__y rt 03'l�Ftst'S sw �t-w (1. 6. River basin: Nd u.s e
7. Approximate drainage area: 44,1410 Acrt:s 8. Stream order: d-
9. Length of reach evaluated: " / 5;::. U P` 10. County: Grey. va,v
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): 1UpAir
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 3 S, 3 o d q B' Longitude (ex. -77.556611): `" % t7, m 5 D yS
Method location determined (circle): GPS T Shertbo (Aeric!) Photo/- GEIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
Muee1'06-fa,AJ. C. oxr4r-t.h�'e A.d Ala""( of 4,e -K stm, t
14. Proposed channel work (if any):_ lVo A,/e
15. Recent weather
16. Site conditions at time of
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known:
Section 10
_Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
,Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters -Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -1V)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? ES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: G qc-
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? (OW20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
,iD
21. Estimated watershed land use: 0 Residential 10 % Commercial �% Industrial t&3%Agricultural
Forested _% Cleared / Logged ____.% Other
22. Bankfull width:of - y ¢'P p_�- 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 3
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2%) ✓/Gentle (2 to 4%) _,Moderate (4 to 10%) `Steep (>10%)
/
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight ✓ Occasional bends _Frequent meander Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet- Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments: Pe rr,y7V r,1• l
�t
;- �II e-r,1e,,r
Evaluator's Signature 4_{' lJ ct Date Id [>/O
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

FEB 21 2011
STREAM Q UALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Ihese Itaricteristicsare not mst!ssed in coastal streams.
i4MV 4kPS�
..... -----
Ic
1pa
Presence of flow/ persistent pools in stream
0" 5
( no flow ar saturation = 0, sfivng flow -= max points),
evidence of paA human alteration
0 5
extensivealteration max rots
W2 2661iq�...
pan
0,
5 ­
(nobuffer-e buffer max P-0 M* ts)
c ­rg­�-!,
Vi Bence nen
t br chemical dii"lie4
0 5
a A
0 A `es
.-
ifiviiii agili arge
springs, seeps, wetlandetc.,= max points)"
Presence of adjacent floodplain
•0,
I 4
d,
no floodp ain= ; extens7wei flood Iain max ppints)
E tire
7.
inai
0 4
'decplY entrenched:k; 0; frequent flooding pamts
80-2
-Presence of adjacent wetlands `
o
P011,
no sveilsutds.= 0; 1aike` adjacent wed 6Y
7s
Channel sinuosity
0-5.
-
0. 3-.
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = 6&x p6inti)
lti5
Sediment input..
deposition-
1, . . Z.
0
�­ 0-4
0: -4
(extensive 0: little or no sediment ='zuix.pDints j'.
Size A diversity of channel bed substrate
0— 4
0—
{fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes max points)_
Evidence of channel incision or widening
'�dec&
0-4
0.-5.
incised bed & banks = mule
Presence or major bank railures
13
(severe erosion = 0; no etosion, stable banks = max points)
5
0- 5
0-5
Root depth and density on banks:
. . .
:_
3
: 0-4
a
In
(no visible roots 0; dense roots diroughout =' ax points)
15 -
Impact. by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
-4
0-5
A
R
(substantial impad =0; no evidenee = max points
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed max ints)
0-5
0-6r
17
Habitat complexity
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
0-6
0-6
0-6
is
Canopy coverage over streambed
= m 9 . rots
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous caro p ax in
-Y)
r 0- 5-` '-0
5
0-5
d,
19
Substrate embeddedness
0-4
0-4
A1*
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure mW
OVT�
.20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
no evidence 0. common, numerous types = max points)
0 .4
0-5
0-
21
Presence of amphibians
no evidence = 0; common, numerous !vpes = max points)
4
6-4
0-4
O -t
22
Presence Of fish
0-4
0-4
0- 4
rme
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
.­
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence max points)
i4, V- 0
T TAL'SCO p), ,-.A 'N J,*
Ihese Itaricteristicsare not mst!ssed in coastal streams.

41Cr/h
Er
North Carolina Division of Water Quality-- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: e 0-1.4,0/V
Project: 're .`w,�7`
�� / Latitude:
.■..raa�■Qao
2
�uvny
2. Sinuosity
3. In -channel structure: riffle -pool sequence
0
0
1
1
Evaluator: Pt: fe S. �j�,/ �.
Site: rq,,,, L:,Pt:
Longitude: -
'7'7
Total Points:
2'
3
S. Active/rellc floodplain
Stream is at least intermittent
County: C ! ✓}-t/ -
Other
3
N219 orperannialifa 30
0
e.g. Ouad Name:
G
A. Geomoroholoov lAuhtntat i '�. _�' x I dhan..# Iw.:.,t. 0■_1___.
la. Continuous bed and bank
----
0
---•-
1
.■..raa�■Qao
2
�uvny
2. Sinuosity
3. In -channel structure: riffle -pool sequence
0
0
1
1
2
2
3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
0
1
2'
3
S. Active/rellc floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Braided channel
0
1
2
3
8. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
9` Natural levees
0
1
2
3
10. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
3
11. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
12. Natural valley and drains away
0
0.5
1
franc or wedaod plants.
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
1.5
USGS or MRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0
Sketch:
Yes = 3
`Man-made ditches are not rated; see disc mium in mannat
B. Hvdralanv rc, d,tntat - 5r. n
14. Groundwater flow/discharge e
0
1
15. Water In channel and > 48 has since rain, o�
3
2'
2
3
Water in channel -- d or rowin season
0
1
20
3
16. Lealiitter
1.5
1
0.5
0
17. Sediment on plants
0
0.5
1
3
18. Organic debris lines or Iles(Wrack lines)
0
0.5
1
1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoAmorphle features) present? I
Nn - n
0.5
1
1 5
C. Biology Subtotal = "7 15'
20 . Fibrous roots in channel
3
2'
1
210. Rooted plants in channel
3
2
Q
0
0
22. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1 5
23. Bivalves
0
1
2
3
24. Fish
0
0.5
1
1
25. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note dhrersfry and abundance)
0
0.5
1
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton
0
0.5
1
1.5
28. Iron oxidizing bacteriatfungus.
0
0.5
1
1.5
29 . Wetland plants In streambed
1 1.5
FAC = 0.5; ACW = 0.75; OBL =1.5 SAV 2.0; Other = 0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants,
Item 29 focuses on the presrn
franc or wedaod plants.
Nates: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
Pt re.VnN,f ! .S71t,'dt -
Sketch:
oZ sot � of G�i h-■tJ.tJe %. �GLI�x� Ne�
,o 6
dam d - _L1 Fk
M415
,tt��od�/�e�cl��-r �p'1�1• SPsW�� S�e��e s d�
��
/ � i � (- � ��d ac! S �/_ . / ttli�-lo ani r %r�
r rr
P � Se.uf � 1t` %rtiJ. 1�/S i
�.0 �►
I- .ticc

Print Forel`::.
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: f",11d��11 id CitylCounty: U14-Aiceld-rO,Gr"/iUC,A1lSamplingDate: WA g/A/tel
Applicant/Owner:! iF waro.✓ N/� fN "�� q 7r! State: !(/ C. Sampling Point: W
Investigator(s): P f_ZR s. l� �/i ice% Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): F/�,s01411y/ S�eelh�A� Local relief (concave, convex, none): c6A.P en Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):_ Lat: 3 s �rlY�i Long: • / �a'3 / %l0 +Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: WA- /-a: rA Alt G NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ❑ No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) /
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydratogy ❑ significantly disturbed? /141 Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? /-'//0 (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophylic Vegetation Present?
Yes No
❑
11
of one is required: check all that apply)
Is the Sampled Area
Surface Water (A1)
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes /No
❑
❑
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
within a Wetland?
Yes No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes No
bi' ater Marks (B1)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
i
[ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
M Sediment Deposits (B2)
Remarks Pa.IuSIB1NL"- 4ve7`/�
��
eo-u�.�le a Ssdc/il.
'f1 �. Com`' °sr /y v`
•-
So�fs,de�e�`�'�`1oryd.,J
ux�� tiy�rola$,rL
.•uaL.�9fe�s Ore.
[LS
/+e�sea/�' AW+�
6•�C�t�% J�
u_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
•fPt & la
6e-
C�1f55rd /G e!
��.ArS��C�<®N
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum
of one is required: check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1)
EbNater-Stained Leaves (Bg)
U Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
.t Hlgh Water Table (A2)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
0 Drainage Patterns (B10)
,I
lYl Saturation (A3)
7®-t
t-1 Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
u Moss Trim Lines (B16)
bi' ater Marks (B1)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
i
[ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
M Sediment Deposits (B2)
l� Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
B
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
[� Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
u_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
ElJr6n Deposits (B5)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
rte❑-
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) lJ Other (Explain in Remarks)
r❑�
L t FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Yes �o ❑ Depth f0 ft
Water Table Present?
(inches): ..5.
Yes © o ❑ Depth (inches): _T,. . A e
Saturation Present?
Yes t' -I No ❑ Depth (inches): stRa �P
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
u d z, 0,0
P61i8,el-
/oc4- -ho ;),
k hpfz�/ ttc�cl71 1/�Jd-
A re�A"dcr ¢�-vi' do- G
V
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version
1cef

EM
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Sapling Stratum (Plot size
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1. 6e.Ot,0 dA. flt&L5 occI'd etJt+rI[S
2, yYco r�/%a c Gd t'�c r
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
✓❑ 0(.1-
a
= Total Cover
= Total Cover
❑ O6L
FRG 4
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1, A-e:js �tAe,ysty
t� ❑
F/��(tJ
2. Agoe gfn4_-%CL. Z cvlr.vd Pic/f
✓ ❑
F.Q cri-
3. "<�l�.� 1a. �y1�A-
❑
DSL
4. k/utiYwPerX ~Q.0yA ,.,w.tta(
✓ ❑
86�•
5. 7 cJ el �'+r« sA.
❑
(A) (B)
fi.
❑
7.
❑
0.
g.
❑
❑
10.
❑
11.
❑
12.
❑
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3_
4
5.
Sampling: Point:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (R)'
Total Number of Dominant A
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAG: (AIB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
t/ Dominance Test is >50%
_ Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height,
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
El
❑ Hydrophytic
Vegetation
= Total Cover Present? Yes ED No El
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
A,-rWi 5 5-d f f -a o /t s r!
- A
t." ��. "g,,Y'eC � lXs w.....s,.,._.��,. e-�r-a/f•W c e., v `_ � �rt.p'rf oere�rBitl.f'( c✓e'���iY ..
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling
I
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) �e
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
yid
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc'
Texture Remarks
10K 0//r ,jai
Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
H dric Soil indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
_O-tPolyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
n 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Q1 --t Histic Epipedon (A2)
DThin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
L.1 Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)Depleted
Matrix (F3)
Redox
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
^�5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
QDepleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
v Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
C1 Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
-r -IUmbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
ODelta
wetland hydrology must be present,
a Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
--TO�Reduced
unless disturbed or problematic.
F] Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_(-{Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
[1 Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
/f
e7c 7/o G �i 7Lc irr k v i GL J w rcf �rr; Uj e
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version
El

Print Form
All llk%
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: tvvr d��7 �a. ,J, A, - City/County: t%f8 Ry�b� Pe% GitfrtrG Sampling Date: 4-1/ S� —, O
Applicant/Owner: Ps �%�T� �'�S�i Il ��5 State: /uf C• , Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): pp,71-e- ir�t �•11 Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): ltd/�` �� Local relief (concave, convex, none): L tgv e Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): L Lat: J 5, :5 d (O 5-elj` Long: — 77- 3 1 7(a Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: /YJ rr u 1,PA &, le e NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes © No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks_)
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology❑significantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present?
❑ ❑ ❑
Yes © No El
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? IVO (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Sail Present?
Yes
Yes
El
❑
No ®1,
No ®,�"
Is the Sampled Area �.
y
Present?
_❑ Water -Stained Leaves (69)
❑
Tr
within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No
Wetland Hydrology
Yes
LJ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
No
Water Marks (B1)
Remarks:f{ Oc-d 6 r e
— dU r�/
Sediment Deposits (B2)
OtJ — ,/ �� crt eSLvJ/F rvc (t �G r
�re.Q �au�o�-
�eefi
� �t
rhe �.�r-�c,r�h- vf' we ¢/a-•trd
So r l S a, rem s�
.� gmta /0 4-e � i.0 t� i c .i- fat S •x. rt tA. 6 y � � �`-
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
0 Surface Soil Cracks (136)
[� Surface Water (A1)
_❑ Water -Stained Leaves (69)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
❑ High Water Table (A2)❑t
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑_ Saturation (A3)
LJ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
T❑—t
t-1 Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (B1)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living
Roots (C3) Lj Crayfish Burrows (C8)
[� Drift Deposits (133)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (85)❑r
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (133)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
L1 Other (Explain in Remarks)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No
❑ Depth (inches): A,'d At !-
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No
❑ Depth (inches): AleAle
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No
❑ Depth (inches): eL4Aj,
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No ❑
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), it available:
y
6gG! r �) leGa7
P'lc.A.tf �G /tCJG^!/✓ G.�DttG /t acylt GuA �zr 7L��vt'� - i t J
yogis IVdt rteef ��r;�- t✓ L�aatL�.1s
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Interim Version

VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point-.;
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1. F� �r-4 5 Z�ct e-c�G �❑ FAC
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2. FAK
❑ �lT�
Total Number of Dominant
3. Lf- ! w �..; r�� r�
Species Across All Strata: IP (B)
4. ❑
❑
Percent of Dominant Species `n 7o/
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: o (A/B)
6.
❑
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
7 ❑
= Total Cover
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
OBL species x 1 =
1,
❑
FACW species x2=
FAC species x 3 =
2, ❑
3-
❑
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4- ❑
5• ❑
6.
❑
Prevalence Index = B/A =
❑
7
Hydraphytic Vegetation Indicators:
= Total Cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
✓ Dpminance Test is >50%
1.
y-❑ moi} E;
_ Prevalence index is :53.0'
_ Problematic Hydraphytic Vegetation` (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 ❑
3. ❑
4 ❑
❑
5.
5.
❑
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7. ❑
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
= Total Cover
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (08H).
Sapling —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2• A`Y �✓ S��SS Y LJ Fid L
�' ` pw`—
�� �
❑
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
3. c_e rc17�c asti4 c I rS t1
f✓ _/v a
4•
❑
❑
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
6.
❑
❑
Herb —All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
7.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
6 ❑
❑
g
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
10 ❑
11. ❑
12.
❑
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. ��w� z00 F U �tr�! 1 A ru�Al�ksJA
r`' ❑ AVL—_
2.
-WC
3.
❑
Hydrophytic
4. ❑
5. ❑
Vegetation
© ❑
= Total Cover
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
- ite e 11­44-,4,i of e -e t-s Ap -0-r fwr..4--
9
��P C
.o �.
` ©tom`
svt A-/ All i.0 a� irc
I
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling
"-"'COVEL
FEIN ?U1i
Point!wlrnhiorlA.q
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Calor (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc` Texture Remarks
_122 te r '
��f� /�ta� �u4,0,D f
A��/
Loc ,�j %P'`!% Crew, iyejm
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
H dric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
(Al)
Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) �] 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Q Histic Epipedon (A2)
T©Polyvalue
OThin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Q Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (1718) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
FLoamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) r—t Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (173) o Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
TRedox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 1538)
DDepleted Dark Surface n
BMuck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
(F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions (178) _u Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Q Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
a Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P. T) 3indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Q Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
F1 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
—ODelta Ochdc (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Q Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
�7t-71Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_t --{Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Q Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S. T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
�-�/
Q
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ii4
SCGiAgION Cc�u-4ewa NLL4) T-- /Q(d to
gOLISGC B .Uri /
^1 e � G 117 �� O � Q- vU e
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Interim Version

Jurisdictional and Protected SE
Investigation Rept)]
Vanceburo, North Carolina
August 2tt I u
A. References
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
Wetlands and Deepwater Habitat of the United States. Fish and Wildlife Service,
U.S. Department of the Interior.
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation
Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1. United States Army Engineer Waterways
Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS. 100
pp. + appendices.
Martof, B.S., W.M. Palmer, J.R. Bailey, and J.R. Harrison III. 1980. Amphibians
and Reptiles of the Carolinas and Virginia. The University of North Carolina
Press, Chapel Hill, NC. 264 pp.
Potter, Eloise F., James F. Parnell, and Robert P. Teulings. 1980. Birds of the
Carolinas. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC. 408 pp.
Radford, A.E., H.E. Ahles, and C.R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the Vascular Flora of
the Carolinas. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC. 1183
PP.
Reed, P.B., Jr. 1988. National list of plant species that occur in wetlands: national
summary. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 88(24). 244pp.
Rohde, F.C., R.G. Arndt, D.G. Lindquist, and J.F. Parnell. 1994. Freshwater
Fishes of the Carolinas, Virginia, Maryland, and Delaware. The University of
North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC.
Sibley, David Allen. 2001. The Sibley Guide to Birds. National Audubon
Society.
USDA site http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2010. Craven County, North
Carolina. Endangered Species, Threatened Species and Federal Species of
Concern. United States Department of Interior.
Weakley, Alan, S. Working Draft 2005. Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and
Georgia. The University of North Carolina Herbarium, North Carolina Botanical
Garden, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Webster, W.D., Parnell, J. F., and W. C. Biggs. 1985. Mammals of the Carolinas,
Virginia, and Maryland. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill,
NC. 255 pp.

RK K
David A. Willoughby
Engineers I Construction Managers I Planners I Scientists
William K. Hellmann
Emeritus
18 February 2011
21 201 i
FEB
David W. Wallace
1(;tt6i�
Mr. Brad Connell
Stephen G. Zentz
Division of Coastal Management
J. Michael Potter
Thomas E. Mohler
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
James A. Zito
400 Commerce Ave.
Michael W. Myers
Morehead City, NC 28557
Robert J. Halbert
- -- -
Subject: Piedmont Natural Gas
Chades . Easter, Jr.
M
Swift Creek, Mauls Swamp and Unnamed Creek Horizontal Directional
Joseph A. Romanowski, Jr.
Drill Crossings
_ Michael L. Krupsaw
Vanceboro, Craven County, NC
Lars E. Hill
J. Tommy Peacock, Jr.
Dear Mr. Connell:
Martin C. Rodgers
Kenneth A. Goon
Richard J. Adams, Jr.
RK&K performed the engineering services for Piedmont Natural Gas for three
John A. d'Epagnier
proposed natural gas pipeline water body crossings. The three water bodies to be crossed
Barbara J. Hoage
are Swift Creek, Mauls Swamp and an unnamed creek in Vanceboro, NC. Please refer to
Christopher F. Wright
Owen L. Peery
Attachment A, which contains the project plans, for the exact locations of the crossings.
Nancy R. Bergeron
Discussions with your office indicated that these three water bodies are subject to the
Stuart A. Montgomery
requirements of the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) and that any work in or
David Vanscoy
around these waters would require a CAMA permit pursuant to 15A NCAC 07H.1600.
J. Bankard, Jr.
Henry J. rd
James F. Ridenour, Jr.
The purpose of the pipeline crossings is to add natural gas distribution capacity in
Robert J. Andryszak
Raymond M. Harbeson, Jr.
Vanceboro. The proposed pipeline will be medium density polyethylene (MDPE), SDR
B- Keith Skinner
11.5, 4 -inch diameter pipe. The natural gas pipeline will be installed beneath the water
Karen B. Kahl
bodies by horizontal directional drilling (HDD) methods. No land disturbance or
Seyed A. Saadat
John C. Moore
construction activities will occur within the banks or adjacent wetlands of any of the three
Eric M. Klein
water bodies. Additionally, the pipeline will be located at depths from thirteen to twenty -
Todd E. Rousenberger
three feet beneath the bottom of the water bodies and no drill entry or exit location will be
Donald P. Lauzon
closer than 100 feet to any stream bank. Please refer to the attached plan sheets for the
Thomas M. Heil
Robert D. Ostermiller
specific installation profiles at each proposed crossing.
Barry L. Brandt
Malachi M. Mills, III
In order to satisfy the requirements of the CAMA permit, notifications were sent by
James A. Burnett
certified mail to the adjacent riparian property owners. The following property owners
Brian L. Hepting
were notified.
Michael V. Gaffney
Lee C. Yowell
Steven L. Thomas
David A. Willoughby
Engineers I Construction Managers I Planners I Scientists

Ir
PBG Vanceboro, NC CAMA Permit
18 February 2011
Page 2
Property Owner
Adjacent Water Body r - -
Mr. & Mrs. Robert Werner
Swift Creek , �in MA
Craven County
Swift Creek
Ms. Beth Taylor Jordan
Unnamed Creek on Farmlife Ave
Town of Vanceboro
Unnamed Creek on Farmlife Ave.
Mr. John Hill Sr.
Mauls Swamp
All five return receipts were received indicating successful delivery of the notifications. Four of the
five property owners returned the signed Adjacent Riparian Property Owner Statement indicating that
they had no objections to the proposed project. Only the Town of Vanceboro failed to return the signed
owner statement. However, town personnel have had discussions with Piedmont Natural Gas regarding
placement of the natural gas pipeline and have not objected to the proposed project. The signed owner
statements, return receipt for the Vanceboro notification and signed authorized agent form are included as
Attachment B.
In addition to contacting the adjacent property owners, the Washington Field Office of the Army
Corp of Engineers was contacted to verify the nationwide permit (NWP) required for work around Swift
Creek. Washington Field Office personnel verified that the proposed work fell under the jurisdiction of a
Section 10, NWP 12 and that written approval is not required. However, a Pre -Construction Notification
Form (PCN) was requested and is included as Attachment C. A Jurisdictional Investigation was
completed in August 2010 at the project site. The Jurisdictional Investigation Report is included as
Attachment D. A copy of this letter and attachments is being submitted concurrently to the Washington
Field Office.
Thank you for expediting your review of this submittal. A check for the $400.00 permit fee is
included with this package. Should you have any questions please contact me at [e-mail] or at
[phone]. Please send the approved permit to Dan Rouse of Piedmont Natural Gas with a copy to
RK&K.
William Dan Rouse
Piedmont Natural Gas
111 Corporate Lane
New Bern, NC 28562
Enclosure
William Snyder, P.E.
RK&K
845 Church St. North Suite 104
Concord, NC 28025
Sincerely,
0,,e�L
V ----
William P. Snyder, P.E.
Project Manager
Cc: Dan Rouse, Piedmont Natural Gas
William Wescott, USACE — Washington Field Office

RKK
FEB 2 1 2011
M®robecdCRyDO,
ATTACHMENT A: PROJECT PLANS
Engineers I Construction Managers I Planners I Scientists

STREETS FERRY ROAD ® SWIFT CREEK - HDD
FARMLIFE AVENUE ® NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD - HDD
Piedmont
Natural Gas
VANCEBORO
NA TURAL GAS PIPELINE HDD
FEBRUARY, 2010
FARM'_IFE AVENUE @ UNNAMED CREEK - HDD
MAULS SWAMP - HDD
FER 2 1 20i
Morehead OlPfDim
INDEX OF SHEETS
SHEET TITLE SHEET N0.
COVER
-
LEGEND
PNG-VB-LEGEND
GEN'ERAL NOTES
PNG-VS-NOTES
PLAN & PROFILE SHEET
PNG-VB-001 THRU
PNG-VS-004
MISCELLANEOUS PE DETAILS
PNG-VB-D001
EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DETAILS
PNG-VB-DO02
PRELIMINARY
ISSUED FOR PERMITTING
PURPOSES ONLY
RUMMEL, KLEPPER & KAHL, LLP
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
845 CHURCH ST. NORTH, SUITE 102
R
LICENSE CONCORD,
F-0118025
PHONE: [phone]

REFERENCE SECTION
LINETYPE
KEYS
ABBREVIATIONS
SYMBOLS KEYS
REVISION SECTION
BUILDINGS
CB
CATCH BASIN
❑
CATCH BASIN/DRAIN INLET
DATE REV. DESCRIPTION BY
CMP
CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
ra-aw
DIMENSION (TYPICAL)
2/I2/11 0 ISSUED FOR PERMITTING DAW
CUT LINE -----
--------------C --------
CO
CLEAN OUT
O
ELECTRIC BOX
CP
CONTROL POINT (HDD)
DRIVEWAYS
CD
CHECK DAM
'19
FIRE HYDRANT
TEST DATA
EDGE -OF -PAVEMENT
DI
EIP
DRAIN INLET
EXISTING IRON PIN
p
GAS VALVE
LOCATION:
EXISTING CABLE TELEVISION (OVERHEAD)
TV TV — TV TV
FH
FM
FIRE HYDRANT
FORCE MAIN SANITARY SEWER
> —
E9
GUY WIRE
HAND HOLE
DATE' DURATION:
PRESSURE:
EXISTING CABLE TELEVISION (UNDERGROUND)
UTV — UTV UTV
FMV
FORCE MAIN VALVE
O
IRON PIN
CONTRACTOR` WITNESS`
FO
FIBER OPTIC CABLE
0
STREET LAMP
NOTES
EXISTING ELECTRIC (OVERHEAD)
OE — DE OE DE —
GM
GAS MAIN
11 MISCELLANEOUS OBJECTS
GV GAS VALVE l
EXISTING ELECTRIC (UNDERGROUND)
UE UE UE — UE
GR
HDD
GUARDRAIL
HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILL
f
Imp,
NORTH ARROW
POWER POLE (UTILITY POLE)
EXISTING FIBER OPTICS (TELEPHONE)
EXISTING FORCE MAIN (SANITARY SEWER)
FO FO FO FO
FM FM FM FM
IP
OE
PE
INLET PROTECTOR
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC
POLYETHYLENE PIPE
ss
-�
PROPOSED POLE (UTILITY POLE)
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
SIGN
FEB s4 1 2011
EXISTING GAS
"S "S GAS
PP
POWER POLE (UTILITY POLE)
Q
STORM DRAIN MANHOLE
m©roMcdC' yDc
PIP
PIPE INLET PROTECTOR
O
TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
EXISTING STORM DRAIN = _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ =
RR
R/W
RAILROAD
RIGHT-OF-WAY
In
TELEVISION PEDESTAL
EXISTING TELEPHONE (UG)
UT UT UT UT
RCP
REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
TEST BORING
SD
STORM DRAIN
m
TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX
EXISTING WATER
W W W W
SM
SEED AND MULCH
B
TRANSFORMER
FENCE -�
K w K x �+�
SF
SS
TELE
SILT FENCETT
SANITARIA SEWER
TELEPHONE CABLE%
TRANSMISSION TOWER
TREE
FILL LINE -----g
--------------F---------
TV
TV CABLE
®
WATER MANHOLE
PROPERTY LINE -------------------
UE
UG
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
UNDERGROUND
®
WATER METER
WATER VALVE
PRELIMINARY
ISSUED FOR PERMITTING
OPEN WATER - STREAM
-------- - - - -- - - -
UT
UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE
>�
WETLAND
PURPOSES ONLY
UTV
UNDERGROUND TV CABLE
PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED
W
WATER
MATERIALS LIST
WM
WATER MAIN
ITEM DESCRIPTION CITY.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT —o----
e -------o---- d--
WV
WATER VALVE
PROPOSED GAS
PROPOSED GUARDRAIL
PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY ---------------
PROPOSED ROAD
RAILROAD LI V
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
ffl"N` 166PP6Ra °rims 6 KWI LLP
LdWiNa
O4s °NRCR sr. uarnt svne 102
K coumRo. u.c, 2aou
uc°sc f v-0112
vuwaE: T04 -Tax -x420
DESIGNED BY: AS
DRAWN BY: .WS
CHECKED BY: DAW
RAILROAD RIGHT—OF—WAY —'--RR
RR----
RK&K COM. N0. 809-100 DATE
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS AFE NO. 31 2/18/11
SCALENT$
ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY ----R/W-------R/W----
SANITARY SEWER
5S 5S 5S
Piedmont
Natural Gas
SILT FENCE
SF sF SF SF
TREELINE (WOODLINE)
SHEET DESCRIPTION
LEGEND
DwwING: PNG-VB-LEGEND REwSIDN: p

•
REFERENCE SECTION
GENERAL NOTES 23. THE PILOT HOLE SHALL BE DRILLED ALONG THE PATH SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND PROFILE ORA WING
1. ALL CONSTRUCTION METHODS AND MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO MAINTAINING WE SPECIFIED TOLERANCES
THE CURRENT SPECIF7CA77ONS AND STANDARDS OF 24. THE OWNER SHALL APPROVE THE ALIGNMENT OF THE PILOT BORE BEFORE THE REAMING PHASE
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS AND NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OR PIPE PULLING MAY COMMENCE.
OF TRANSPORTATION (NCOOT).
Z ALL WORK SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH OSHA TITLE 29 OF THE CODE 25. IF THE PILOT BORE FAILS TO CONFORM TO THE ABOVE TOLERANCES, OWNER MAY, AT HIS OPTION,
REQUIRE A NEW PILOT BORE TO BE MADE.
OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS. CHAPTER 7 (29 CFR 1926), "OCCUPA77ON
REVISION SECTION
SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY' 26. IN ALL CASES, RIGHT OF WAY RESTRICT70NS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THE LISTED TOLERANCES.
OATS REV. DESCRIPTION BY
2/18/11 0 ISSUED FOR PERMITTING DTW-
J. TEMPORARY DRAINAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE PROKOEO 27. NO PILOT HOLE WILL BE ACCEPTED IF IT WILL RESULT IN ANY OF THE PIPELINE BEING INSTALLED IN
BY 774E CONTRACTOR TO RELIEVE AREAS THAT MAY CAUSE DAMAGE VIOLAT70N OF RIGHT OF WAY RESTRIC77ONS
TO THE ROADWAYS OR IMPEDE TRAFFIC AS DIRECTED BY THE NCDOT
WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS. 28. CONCERN FOR ADJACENT U77LI77ES AND/OR STRUCTURES SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THE LISTED
TOLERANCES. LISTING OF TOLERANCES DOES NOT RELIEVE CONTRACTOR FROM RESPONSIBILITY FOR
4. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OR EXCAVATION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAFE OPERA1701VS OR DAMAGE TO ADJACENT UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES
ASSUME THE RESPONSIBILITY OF LOCAT71VG ANY UNDERGROUND 29. ALL BEND RADIUS SHALL BE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN THOSE LISTED IN THE PROJECT PLANS.
UTILITIES (PUBLIC AND/OR PRIVATE) THAT MAY EXIST IN THE AREA
TEST DATA
LOCATION:
OF CONSTRUCTION. UTILITY OWNERS SHALL BE NOTIFIED INSTALLA770N
IN ACCORDANCE WITH N.C. ONE CALL TIME REQUIREMENTS
IN ADVANCE OF ANY EXCAVA77ON IN THE PROXIMITY OF THE 30, THE CONTRACTOR, SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THESE PLANS, WILL DETERMINE THE EXACT
UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR, AT HIS OWN EXPENSE, SHALL BE METHOD AND TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLE77NG THE HDD CROSSINGS EXCAVATED MUD PITS CONSTRUCTED
DATE: DURATION:
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REPAIR OF EXISTING U77LITTES DAMAGED IN THE ENTRY AND EXIT AREAS WILL BE LIMITED TO THE PIPE BOREHOLE AREA ONLY.
PRESSURE:
DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE 37. PLE770N OF THE DIRECTIONAL DRILLING WORK, THE ENTRY AND EXIT PIT- LOCATION SHALL BE
AFTER COM
N.C. ONE-CALL CENTER AT 1-800-632-4949 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE RESTORED PL THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITIONS.
OF ANY CONSTRUCTION.
CONTRACTOR: WITNESS:
NOTES
PREREAMING REQUIREMENTS
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEARLY LOCATE ALL EXISTING URLIFY
32. AFTER THE PILOT HOLE IS ACCEPTED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM A SIMULTANEOUS REAM
SERVICE CTONS AND AVOID DAMAGING THESE DURING AND PRODUCT PIPE PULL.
CONSTRUCTION. NEC
T
6. 774E CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGES 33. THE MAXIMUM REAM SHALL BE 8-INCHES FOR THE 4-INCH STEEL PIPE AND FOR THE 4-INCH PE PIPE
UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
AND/OR PENAL71ES RESUL77NG FROM ALL NON-COMPLIANCE WITH
FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS AND ENCROACHMENT 34. BUOYANCY MODIRCAT70NS SHALL BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR. ANY BUOYANCY
td�
AGREEMENTS. MODIF7CA770N PROCEDURE PROPOSED FOR USE SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO OWNER OR ENGINEER FOR
7. ALL PAVEMENT DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTON SHALL BE APPROVAL. THE CONTRACTOR lS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO THE PULL SECTON RESULTING FOR
RESTORED TO PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONDlTONS BY THE BUOYANCY MODlF7CATONS.
��gg g 9'
FEB 2 Y ?011
CONTRACTOR ACCORDING TO NCOOT REQUIREMENTS PULLBACK REQUIREMENTS
35. CONTRACTOR SHALL PULL EXTRA LENGTH OF STEEL PRODUCT PIPE SO ONE WELD JOINT CAN BE EXAMINED.
8. THE GAS MAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED SO AS TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM CONTRACTOR SHALL OVERPULL A LENGTH EQUAL TO 5,' OF THE TOTAL LENGTH OF EACH PE DRILL SO THE
OF TWENTY FOUR (24) INCHES OF CLEARANCE TO ALL OTHER CONDITION OF THE PE PIPE CAN BE EXAMINED.
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES. WHERE THIS IS NOT
pc
POSSIBLE APPROPRIATE PROTECTION SHALL BE INSTALLED. 36. THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE TENSILE LOAD IMPOSED ON THE PRODUCT PIPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 34,600 LBF
9. ALL DRAINAGE PIPES AND STRUCTURES SHALL BE CLEANED OF FOR THE 4-INCH STEEL PIPE AND 6200 LBF FOR THE 4-INCH PE PIPE.
DEBRIS AND ERODED MATERIALS RESUL77NG FROM CONSTRUCTION. 37. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPORT THE PRODUCT PIPE PULL SECTON AS IT PROCEEDS DURING PULLBACK SO
THESE PIPES AND STRUCTURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED CLEAN THAT IT MOVES FREELY AND IS NOT OVER STRESSED.
DURING THE PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION.
38. THE MAXIMUM SPACING OF PIPE SUPPORTS FOR THE PRODUCT PIPE DURING PULLBACK IS f00-FEET:
10. ALL DISTURBED SLOPES SHALL BE RESTORED TO EXISTING GRADES 39. THE MAXIMUM SPACING FROM THE ENDS OF PRODUCT PIPE TO F7RST PIPE SUPPORT IS 40-FEE%
AND STABILIZED WITH SEED AND TACK IF APPROPRIATE
DRILLING FLUIDS
11. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ANO MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL 40. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT THE COMPOSIT70N OF ALL DRILLING FLUIDS TO ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL.
MEASURES AS DESCRIBED ON THE PROJECT PLANS AND DETAILS
DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SURFACE RESTORAT701V UNTIL SUCH 47. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT USE ANY DRILLING FLUID THAT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND
MEASURES ARE NOT NECESSARY. WHERE ADDIT701VAL MEASURES EWROMENTAL REGULATIONS
ARE NECESSARY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN
THE APPROPRIATE MEASURES ACCORDING TO THE NORTH CAROLINA 42. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING, TRANSPORTING, AND STORING ANY WATER REQUIRED FOR
PRELIMINARY
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING DESIGN MANUAL. DRILLING FLUIDS
ISSUED FOR PERMITTING
12. SEED ALL D1577JRBED AREAS AND MULCH AS REQUIRED. 43. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAXIMIZE RECIRCULATION OF DRILLING FLUID SURFACE RETURNS
PURPOSES ONLY
VARIATIONS IN PLAN OR PROFILE 44. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SOLIDS CONTROL AND FLUID CLEANING EQUIPMENT OF A CONRGURATON AND
CAPACITY THAT CAN PROCESS SURFACE RETURNS AND PRODUCE DRILLING FLUID SU TABLE FOR REUSE.
13. 774E CONTRACTOR MAY REQUEST CHANGES TO THE PROPOSED VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT ¢5. DISPOSAL OF EXCESS DRILLING FLUIDS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN
OF THE INSTALLATION AND THE OF THE ENTRY AND EXIT POINTS PROPOSED CHANGES SHALL COMPLIANCE WITH ALL ENNROMENTA REGULATONS, RIGHT OF WAY, AND WORKSPACE AGREEMENTS, AND PERMIT
BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER ANNDD RRECECEIVE APPROVAL OF THE OWNER PRIOR 70 CONSTRUCTION. REQUIREMENTS
MATERIALS LIST
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY.
14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT' (PLAN VIEW) AS INDICATED ON
THE PROJECT PLANS WITH A t/- 2 FOOT VARIANCE. 46. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT DRILLING FLUID DISPOSAL PROCEDURES TO OWNER FOR APPROVAL.
15. CONTROL POINT ELEVAT70NS SHOWN INDICATE THE MINIMUM COVER AND SHALL NOT BE REDUCED. 47. CONTRACTOR SHALL EMPLOY BEST EFFORTS TO MAINTAIN FULL ANNULAR CIRCULA77ON OF DRILLING FLUID.
THE CON IRA CTOR MAY DRILL DEEPER WITH 774E APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER. 48. DRILLING FLUID RETURNS AT LOCATIONS OTHER THAN THE ENTRY AND EXIT PITS SHALL BE MINIMIZED.
PILOT HOLE REQUIREMENTS 49. IN THE EVENT THAT ANNULAR CIRCULA77ON IS LOST CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ACTION TO RESTORE CIRCULATON.
16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AT ALL TIMES PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN INSTRUMENTATION WHICH WILL 50. IF INADVERTENT SURFACE RETURNS OF GRILLING FLUIDS OCCUR, CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY CONTAIN AND COLLECT.
ACCURATELY LOCATE THE PILOT HOLE, MEASURE DRILL STRING AXIAL AND TORSION LOADS, AND
MEASURE DRILLING FLUID DISCHARGE RATE AND PRESSURE.
17. THE OWNER WILL HAVE ACCESS TO THESE INSTRUMENTS AND THEIR READINGS AT ALL TIMES
18. THE CONTRACTOR, WHEN REQUESTED BY THE OWNER, WILL PROVIDE INSPECTION HOLES AT NO
ADDITONAL COST TO VISUALLY VERIFY THE LOCATION AND CONDITION OF THE DRILLED PIPELINE54s
19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLOT THE ACTUAL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL ALIGNMENT OF THE PILOT
Rurrc s,,KARA ur
a'.Ks. Nan smE ,Sz
'fc w"CI `,zaoss
PMM 7 + M-2425
DESIGNED BY: .0s
DRAWN BY: .w5
CHECKED BY: DAW
RK&K COM. NO. 809-100 DATE
PIEDMONT NATURAL CAS AFE 740.31 p�ig�11
SCgLE NTS
BORE AT INTERVALS NOT EXCEEDING 20 FEET.
20. THIS AS-BUILT" PLAN AND PROFILE SHALL BE UPDATED AS THE PILOT BORE IS ADVANCED.
21 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GRANT THE OWNER ACCESS TO ALL DATA READOUT PERTAINING TO
THE POSITION AND INCLINA77ON OF 774E SOREHEAD. WHEN REQUESTED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
PROVIDE EXPLANA77ONS OF HIS POSITON MONITORING AND STEERING EQUIPMENT
Piedmont
22. THE ACTUAL PILOT HOLE EXIT POINT SHALL BE LOCATED W177-IIN TWO (2) FEET LATERALLY OF THE EXIT POINT
SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. LONGITUDINALLY THE ACTUAL EXIT POINT SHALL BE NO MORE THAN FIVE
Natural G a s
(5) FEET SHORT OR FIVE (5) FEET PAST THE EXIT POINT SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.
SHEET DESCRIPTION
GENERAL NOTES
DRAWING: PNG-VB-NOTES RensloN: 0

R.O.W. AND PROPERTY
NCOOT
us 17
LESLIE AND DANA WOODCOCK
REFERENCE SECTION
LINE STATIONS
STREETS FERRY
ROAD (SR 1440)
(60' R/W)
MAIN ST.
(55' R/W)
DB 2851 PG 880
PID 1 -V -O9-037
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION PROV DED BY CRA VEN
COUNTY N.C., GIS DEPARTMENT - B/9/1D
I I j i
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION PROVIDED BY McKIM & CREED
ENGINEERS, PLANNERS, SURVEYORS - 9/29/10
2
1
\ r
CEOTECH INFORMATION PROVIDED BY S&ME,
A
JOB NO. - 1551-1°-107 - 10/8/2010
MW
x am uu
2 vol�i v
R
I
LEGEND
1f
ca DO
O
9
TOP ELEV=13.1.0
¢
D+DD
a
+DD_�
Topsoil
SR 1
h
'
a
SC f SM, Clayey Sand
HDD POINT
PE SIDE
€ o .
/moo
�1`
\
NI 587898.7
E 2552120.4
N aag/3j; w�` '�9. 7FIMP
's_�, d = w t, ', ARK
HDD PON
SM, Silty Sand
1
\
\
14 PP -HDD
�i 4;� �tf A�
RIG SIDE
ff SP/SM, Poorly—graded
w 5
a 2582 iai
"' o�.�.
e
I Sand with Silt
>00< Fill\
\ \
°'_'"
\\//
Sandy Clay
t
6 y�
SC, Clayey Sand
30
EXISTING
j DEPTH UNKNOWN
Silty Clay
HDD POINT 12'
20
PIPE SIDE
NOS
BRIDGE 70'
ELEVATIONN15.00' a
COMPOUND SIDE BEND AND SAG BEND AT STA 13+58
15—
COMPOUND RADIUS 962'
0
re z
COMPOUND ANGLE 18.8'
E%ISTI BRIDGE EXISTING 8 IDCE d W
yg_7 HEAOW LL HEADWALL 10
5
RIG SIDI,
Ile LEN TH - 76.9'
-zo
LENGTH a 134.3-/"q
34.3
..I ' y
-,;e- --
FEB 21 2011
-S0
` PC 16,
4
SAG BEND
27
_,a
gt
RADIUS OF CURVATURE = 550'
PT
a
T LENGTH - 151.4'
-so
9
BT w'
-60
11
er a w'
CL RVATURE - 0' PT/PC 2'
DAYtW BLEU
GTH m
105 SAG BEID
-70.00
0i 7 OT
�n Ma
10+00
11+00
12+00 13+00 14+00
CONTROL POINT
CP #1
CP #2
PRELIMINARY
STATION
STA 11+06
STA 13+58
ISSUED FOR INFORMATION
DEPTH
36'
21'
EROSION & SEDIMENTATION
SF
PURPOSES ONLY
NTS
SF
9+75
STA 14+32
SUMMARY OF MATERIALS
NOTES
APPROVAL
PROJECT
TEM ouANTITY
DESCRIPTION
1. BASE DRAWING IS DERIVED FROM EXISTING MAO DRAW,NG INFORMATION AS INDICATED IN THE REFERENCE—SECTION. PERMITS BID CONSTRUCTION
THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION IS NOT GUARANTEED. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. INITIALS DATE INITIALS DATE INITIALS DATE
3 CAALLCUlATED LOCATIONS . u ,BAC COAD ON PRODUCT PIPE IS 4600 LBF. DRAFTING &DESIGN - RK&K
INTERNAL REVIEW - RK&K
ENGINEERING - RK&K
PIEDMONT NATURAL CAS
REVISIONS
REV. DESIG DRAFT CHECK DESCRIPTION DATE
PROJECT
NSRR AND CREEKS • VANCEBORO
HDD
Piedmont
N a t u ra I G a s
2 470 LF 1 4" PE PIPE. MEDIUM DENSITY, SDR 11.5
ALIGNMENT SHEET
SHEET DESCRIPTION
PLAN & PROFILE SHEET
SWIFT CREEK CROSSING
STA S+TS TO STA 14+32
rRDYAT4 x9�Twc PPBR & EIZZ L&P
wAwa+Tras
�s °""�" `• N0 sunt 1Dc
m�cRD'I :`61
PwDc TD4-TBt-zpze
SCALE
PUN I"= 100'
PROFILE
D JAS JAS DAW ISSUED FOR PERMITTING. 2/18/11
TEST DATA
TESTEDFROM s7an0N: TO STATION:
MEDIUM: RECDRD TEST PRESSURE: ,,I,
RK&K COM. N0. 809-100
PIEOMONT NATURAL GAS AFE NO. 31
HDR. 1 = 100'
VERT. 1 = 40'
DRAWING: PNG•VB401 REVISION: 0

R.O.W. AND PROPE
LINE STATIONS
S
TOWN OF VANCEBORO VANCEBORO
FARMUFE AVENUE BUCK ST.
(60' R/W) (60' R/W)
/
I
/ I
HDD
TOWN OF VANCEBORO
FARMLIFE AVENUE
(60' R/W )
PIPE SID
N 5697 .4
E 25519 .9
I
c
52' FH -HDD —
\ (60• R A V — 'R/W-- —
= Ig v o —10' � � FARMLFE AVE"
11+00 r, S�'\ 12+00 1 13+00 I (60• R/w) -
/
DA 1D+00 R t'..-
D POINT ® — -- -4 ' © 10 1 237' TEM Ff SPACE
RIG SIDE 2 / / 2
N 569455.6
/
120 2551777.3 / / 106' MH -HDD
/ KORK / /_ / s ' sCE
40
30
20
10
0
—10
—20
DATV3( EL87
—30.00
9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00
CUNTROL POINT CP #1 CP #2 CP #3
STATION STA 10+73 STA 11+50 STA 12+42
I I 14' 22' 18'
EROSION Fc SEDIMENTATION SF SF
NTS 10+00 STA 13+25
SUMMARY OF M
DESCRIPTION
4- PE PIPE. MEDIUM
NOTES
APPROVAL
EXIS NO 84" CMP
1. BASE DRAWING IS DERIVED FROM EXISTING MAP AND DRAWING INFORMATION AS INDICATED IN THE REFERENCE SECTION,
THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION IS NOT GUARANTEED. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS
STA 10±M
PERMITS BID CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT
STO DRAIN
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
HDD P NT 12'
12' PPROX.
IANITARY
DESIGN RK&K
ETA 13+25
RIG SI
EXISTING
U
PRO "' T.O.P.
EXISTING GRADE
HD D POINT 1
INTERNAL REVIEW - RK&K
WATER MAIN
CO
EXISTING
PI PE SIDE
71
DEPTH UNKNO
W R
ALIGNMENT SHEET
REVISIONS
DEPTH UNKNOWN
LENGTH - 91.1'
REV. DESIGN DRAFT CHECK DESCRIPTION DATE
STA 10+ j PC 12' G BEND
SCALE
0 WRN WRN DAW ISSUED FOR PERMITTING. 2/16/11TEST
LENGTH m 64.9'
eas cNuaal sT. xoRnt wrrt 1Dz
? CONCORD. NF. 28025
PLAN
1" 1[
PT
RADIUS
CF
PROFILE
CURVATURE a 400
11+72
PHDNE TDI -182-2x28
LENGTH
83.8'
PT C 10'
RADIUS OF RVATURE 400'
RK&K COM. NO. 809-100
HDR.
SA BEND
LENGTH s 9.B'
PIEDMONT NATURAL PAS AFE NO. 31
VERT
1" 4(
9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00
CUNTROL POINT CP #1 CP #2 CP #3
STATION STA 10+73 STA 11+50 STA 12+42
I I 14' 22' 18'
EROSION Fc SEDIMENTATION SF SF
NTS 10+00 STA 13+25
SUMMARY OF M
DESCRIPTION
4- PE PIPE. MEDIUM
NOTES
APPROVAL
PROJECT
1. BASE DRAWING IS DERIVED FROM EXISTING MAP AND DRAWING INFORMATION AS INDICATED IN THE REFERENCE SECTION,
THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION IS NOT GUARANTEED. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS
PERMITS BID CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
INITIALS DATE INITIALS DATE INITIALS PATE
2. COORDINATE LOCATIONS ARE BASED N. NAD
LOCATIONS
DESIGN RK&K
NSRR AND CREEKS - VANCEBORO
D N PROD
PRODUCT PIPE IS 3100 LBF.
3. CALCULATED PULLBACK LOAD IPE
DRAFTING & -
INTERNAL REVIEW - RK&K
HDD
ENGINEERING - RK&K
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
ALIGNMENT SHEET
REVISIONS
REV. DESIGN DRAFT CHECK DESCRIPTION DATE
RVM"I- ia'�unxc wcR & SAOG LLP
mwrrxs
SCALE
0 WRN WRN DAW ISSUED FOR PERMITTING. 2/16/11TEST
DATA
eas cNuaal sT. xoRnt wrrt 1Dz
? CONCORD. NF. 28025
PLAN
1" 1[
uc�sc (F-n11z
PROFILE
TESTED FROM STATION:
TO STATION:
PHDNE TDI -182-2x28
MEDIUM:
RECORD TEST PRESSURE: Psig
RK&K COM. NO. 809-100
HDR.
1" - 1(
PIEDMONT NATURAL PAS AFE NO. 31
VERT
1" 4(
REFERENCE SECTION
PHIC INFORMATION PROVIDED BY
N.C., GIS DEPARTMENT — 8/9/1
INFORMATION PROVIDED BY S&)
— 1581-10-107 — 10/8/201
FEB 21 2011
hforGheg,!%/Denti
PRELIMINARY
ISSUED FOR PERMITTING
PURPOSES ONLY
Piedmont
Natural Gas
SHEET DESCRIPTION
PLAN & PROFILE SHEET
UNNAMED CREEK CROSSING
STA 1/0.+0p0 TO STA 13+25
PNG.V "" 2 REVISION; D

W. AND PROPERTY
LINE 3TATIONS
I
I
I
I
I I
TOWN OF VANCEBORO VANCEBORO VANCEBORO NORFOLK SOUTHERN
FARMLIFE AVENUE MOORE ST. FARMLIFE AVENUE RAILROAD
I(60' R/W) (60' R/W) (60' R/W) (100' R/W)
$jaair
A 1OM'DS 1D i0 °cam' 6�p1ii1 ° a
TI
— ^—� Lo s z -T 6 Da Is v41 PTA D9 163 PC 503
PID/ 1 -V -OT -00) I VI � CAN0.111 NUL RU55F11
y DB tub PG Tat
LO13 ]-9 9Lpp( IS
PFR °0 I65 PD SDS
I nDi 1-v-D1-DDa
INSTALL IPELINE I
LOCATI MARKER CROSSING N .
I (SEE SHEET DDO1) I .48f8-1oOT
I a i I STA 132+09
1ET15 a. 6E1.A- JL PND I
vnr,: u31A s 4 1�RM
HDD POINT
� H D P01 T I DB zpn °D n{ � I ROSSING
RIC SIDE °IDr t-v-DD-D{s I I � PIPE SIDE
,5 I cd u, I N 570866.5
E 25523 7.2 E 2552548.7
R/W • — - — _ _
B TCP _n—
F AVS 73' -HDD -1 11
60' R/W) 10+DD 11+00 a v
R
—R/W a r R 3
1 �ol
I ��I
i I
I I
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
OA2 M 67GV
-30.00
I
SSI GAR `l
ULL
,.
I 1,01M 6 VPFCE
OB 29,6 POV]5]
.IDL$ 2-0, E -D. BLOIX 6�
PER DO I83 PC 505 I
',
277 qG 8{ 4
LOiD�99L '1{
PER1)66 PIXG]/y�C
ROi 1-V�OD�Ob-�
PlV 6>/OOl/
p' 12
IAA— O 11 I—RO
I
TOWN OF VANCEBORO
FARMLIFE AVENUE
(60' R/W )
i lim
5 6 STA 13+19 la I
1 58 PP -HDD s II z a
I Imo_ 140' TEMP m ) I l
8 WORK SPACE s
g I STA 12+34 I II D. NQA . Pro
q INSTALL PIPELINE z, H. WR�IA cuRIEaRt
LOCATION MARKER max w vPNCEeao I ° noj i v o]�w3 ?s
D6 ro PD 6{I
'. (SEE SHEET D001) Inn z-] 6IDcx 14
PER De 165 Po 505
v Npr 1-V-OT-DD7
I
200' 138'
w 51 51-
E ISTINC RADE
SUMMARY OF MATERIALS
DESCRIPTION
EXI nNG
I SEB
u
PROJECT
PROJECT
NSRR AND CREEKS - VANCEBORO
HDD
u
it
I
b
IAA— O 11 I—RO
I
i I
I
a FIWOAaON
DB 1501 Po IDs
LOi2PFRPo ]PC 101
RI
�
RD/ 1 -V -OT -DOS
5
I
�
ZI�nK��pW
WOC�,
RK&K COM. N0. 809-100
PIEDMONT NANRAL CAS AFE NO. 31
HDD POINT 12'
LINE MA KER WN
i
-R—/*
—n
E R
-n-
n-------------------� s n ----t'- - -
F BE ANEWS
EC},
o
(60' R!/W)
-
_
— — --r _ R/w
i lim
5 6 STA 13+19 la I
1 58 PP -HDD s II z a
I Imo_ 140' TEMP m ) I l
8 WORK SPACE s
g I STA 12+34 I II D. NQA . Pro
q INSTALL PIPELINE z, H. WR�IA cuRIEaRt
LOCATION MARKER max w vPNCEeao I ° noj i v o]�w3 ?s
D6 ro PD 6{I
'. (SEE SHEET D001) Inn z-] 6IDcx 14
PER De 165 Po 505
v Npr 1-V-OT-DD7
I
200' 138'
w 51 51-
E ISTINC RADE
SUMMARY OF MATERIALS
DESCRIPTION
EXI nNG
Y= Q u
O'" N�Qp I
AS MAIN
PROJECT
PROJECT
NSRR AND CREEKS - VANCEBORO
HDD
170 LF 4' STEEL PIPE, W.T. OA138, X42
DUAL COATED 12 MILS t2 FBE AND 20 MILS f2
POWERCRETE
ELECTRICINE
2 EA. 4' ST. x 4' PE TRANSITION FlITING
MARKE
2 EA_ CP TEST STATION SEE DETAIL, SHEET 0003
2 EA CP ANODE, 34 Ib (SEE DETAIL, SHEET 0003)
RUMMEL n PPER & �'
815 cHURJI pRal 102
WNWRO. KC.. Mn
�� ucENsc r c -DI Iz
PFgNL TO{ -182-2{20
SCALE
PUN 1 = iE
PROFILE
GAS MAIN DEPTH
ZI�nK��pW
WOC�,
RK&K COM. N0. 809-100
PIEDMONT NANRAL CAS AFE NO. 31
HDD POINT 12'
LINE MA KER WN
i
HDD POINT
10'
RIG SIDE
�UN
o
PIPE SIDE
YB-
r
__
_ .I, —9
_—_ _
—_—___—_
—__._
STA 9+58T.
n
RTA 13+24
START OFIMF)
M.��
rW
PROJECT
o
ROJECT
LENGTH - 7.7'
—
—
PC 12' SAG BEND
s
PC 10'
S
PT
SAC BEND
CURVATURE - 400'
LENGTH
LENGTH
63.8'
i.: 1z
89.6'
L3STA 1T
RADIUS CURVATURE
- 500'
soX
to
LENGTH 87.3'
PT
Bre '
a 50'
Nd
Nn
9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00
CONTROL POINT CP #1 CP #2 CP ,#3 CP ,#4 CP #5
STATION STA 10+00 STA 10+40 STA 10+83 STA 11+73 STA 12+60
DEF 1 12' 18' 21' 22' 13'
EROSION & SEDIMENTATION SF SF
NTS STA 9+73 STA 13+09
r
I
I
I
I
I
REFERENCE SECTION
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION PROVIDED B1
—II. III III nCPARTUCNT _ R/O/I
I CEOTECH INFORMATION PROVIDED BY S&ME,
.Ino un
In/R/­ ,
n/R/ n,
FEB 2 1 2011
LEG` ?4WJCIfvDr_w
Topsoil
– – SC/SM, Clayey Sand
SM, Silty Sand
t SP/SM, Poorly–graded
Sand with Silt
XXX
Fill
Sandy Clay
�Z///- SC, Clayey Sand
Silty Clay
SP, Poorly–graded
Sand
NOTES (CONTINUED)
APPROVED AMERICAN RAILWAY ENGINEERING AND MAINTENANCE
OF WAY ASSOCIATION SPECIFICATIONS. FOR PIPEUNES CONVEYING
FLAMMABLE AND NON-FLAMMABLE SUBSTANCES.
6. BLASTING IS N07 PERMITTED.
7. PIPELINES CARRING FLAMMABLE AND NONFLAMMABLE GAS
PRODUCTS SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF
THE CURRENT ANSI B 31.0 GAS TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION
PIPING SYSTEMS.
UANITTTY
SUMMARY OF MATERIALS
DESCRIPTION
NOTES
t. BASE DRAWING IS DERIVED FROM EXISTING MAP AND DRAWING INFORMATION AS INDICATED IN THE REFERENCE SECTION.
THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION IS NOT GUARANTEED. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY CONDITIONS AND UTIU TY LOCATIONS
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
2. 3. CALCULATED AP ROXOORDNATE N PULLBACK LOAD ON PRODUCT PIPE IS 3508 LBF.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW ALL REQUIREMENTS OF NORLFOLK SOUTHERN NSCE-8 SPECIFICATIONS.
5. PIPEUNE AND CROSSING SHOUO BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAST APPROVED AMERICAN
CONTINUED AT RIGH
REVISIONS
REV. DESIGN DRAFT CHECK DESCRIPTION DATE
APPROVAL
PERMITS 910 CONSTRUCTION
INRALS DATE INMALS1 PATE INITIALS DATE
DRAFTING & DESIGN - RK&K
INTERNAL REVIEW - RX&K
ENGINEERING - RK&K
PIEDMONT N4TURAL CAS
PROJECT
PROJECT
NSRR AND CREEKS - VANCEBORO
HDD
170 LF 4' STEEL PIPE, W.T. OA138, X42
DUAL COATED 12 MILS t2 FBE AND 20 MILS f2
POWERCRETE
2 EA. 4' PE VALVE
2 EA. 4' ST. x 4' PE TRANSITION FlITING
ALIGNMENT SHEET
2 EA_ CP TEST STATION SEE DETAIL, SHEET 0003
2 EA CP ANODE, 34 Ib (SEE DETAIL, SHEET 0003)
RUMMEL n PPER & �'
815 cHURJI pRal 102
WNWRO. KC.. Mn
�� ucENsc r c -DI Iz
PFgNL TO{ -182-2{20
SCALE
PUN 1 = iE
PROFILE
ro WRN WRN DAW ISSUED FOR PERMITTING. 2/16/11
TEST DATA
TESTED FROM STATION: TO —ON:
MEDIUM: RECORD TEST PRESSURE: psig
RK&K COM. N0. 809-100
PIEDMONT NANRAL CAS AFE NO. 31
HORI- = 11
. _
VERs. 1 = 41
PRELIMINARY
ISSUED FOR PERMITTING
PURPOSES ONLY
Piedmont
Natural Gas
SHEET DESCRIPTION
PLAN & PROFILE SHEET
NSRR CROSSING
STA 9+53 TO STA 13+24
DRAWING PNG-VB-003 REVISION: 0

R.O.W. AND PROPERTY NCDOT
LINE "STATIONS MILL FARM ROAD (SR 1637)
(60' R/W )
1
,4
b / B
\ mm
_ Obi- fl o4
_
- \ I s��A MµILS SWAMP
�-
\`
\0RR alw
_ogyp
C
1 TEMP. WORK
SPACE
\�
350' LONG
STA 9 2k
HDD PC iNT 12'
`\- \
HIM_
PIPE SIDE
1
N 571670.2 �/
1,
E 2553798.4 /
-50.00
W
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
NT
-W 65 -� \
_ 2+00
/ c STA 13+41
t z HIM
RIG SIDE
y N 571 BB5.1
m' E 2554066.7 ti
9+00 10+00 11+00
12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00
CONTROL POINT CP #1 CP #2
STATION STA 11+01 STA 12+26
DEi' 1 23' 24'
EROSION & SEDIMENTATION SF SF
NTS 9+96 STA 13+41
SUMMARY OF MATERIALS
DESCRIPTION
THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION IS NOT GUARANTEED. CONTRACTOR SHAU. VERIFY CONDITIONS AND
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
2. COORDINATE LOCATIONS ARE BASED ON N.C.G.S., NAD 83.
3. CALCULATED APPROX. PULLBACK LOAD ON PRODUCT PIPE IS 3320 LBF.
NOTE,
COMPOUND SIDE BEND AND SAG BEND AT STA 12+26
COMPOUND RADIUS - 716'
COMPOUND ANGLE 17.8'
DRAFTING & DESIGN - RK&K
INTERNAL REVIEW - RK&K
ENGINEERING - RK&K
APPROVAL
PERMITS I BID I CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT
PROJECT
NSRR AND CREEKS • VANCEBORO
HDD
ALIGNMENT SHEET
.aPPIw WIG LLP SCALE
aas cmna n. uortrx, sutrz loz „. t' = 7 [
TEST DATA couwxo. Na. zeozs
umrsc f T-onz
TESTED FROM STATION: TO STATION: ICE 1oC-ie2-26i6
MEDIUM: RECORD TEST PRESSURE: psig RK&K COM. NO. 009-100
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS AFE N0. 31
PROFILE
1 too'
REFERENCE SECTION
INFORMATION PROVIDED BY
JOB NO. - 1561-10-107 - 10/8/2010
ACEIVE®
FEB 2 1 2011
L�6�j�a��la
Topsoil
SC/SM, Clayey Sand
SM, Silty Sand
SP/SM, Poorly—graded
Sand with Silt
Fill
Sandy Clay
SC, Clayey Sand
Silty Clay
SP/SC, Poorly—graded
Sand with Clay
PRELIMINARY
ISSUED FOR PERMITTING
PURPOSES ONLY
'Piedmont
Natural Ga
SHEET DESCRIPTION
PLAN & PROFILE SHEET
MAULS SWAMP CROSSING
STA 9+96 TO STA 13+41
PNG-VB-M I
REVISION: Q
STA 9 2k
HDD PC iNT 12'
STA 1 41
HDD POINT 14'
—RIG 5 DF
PIPE S1
-----
Ib
n�
- - - - -
- --
o- ---- ---
----- ----
----
$,
L_..� N
Wor
LENGTH -
108'
♦`
4 • OP LENGTH
PC 14' SAG BEND
117'
PT
RADIUS OF.
CURVATUR 300'
LENGTH - 26'
No
N Nn
and n�
O� 0A
c j obi w� Y
� .r
9+00 10+00 11+00
12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00
CONTROL POINT CP #1 CP #2
STATION STA 11+01 STA 12+26
DEi' 1 23' 24'
EROSION & SEDIMENTATION SF SF
NTS 9+96 STA 13+41
SUMMARY OF MATERIALS
DESCRIPTION
THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION IS NOT GUARANTEED. CONTRACTOR SHAU. VERIFY CONDITIONS AND
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
2. COORDINATE LOCATIONS ARE BASED ON N.C.G.S., NAD 83.
3. CALCULATED APPROX. PULLBACK LOAD ON PRODUCT PIPE IS 3320 LBF.
NOTE,
COMPOUND SIDE BEND AND SAG BEND AT STA 12+26
COMPOUND RADIUS - 716'
COMPOUND ANGLE 17.8'
DRAFTING & DESIGN - RK&K
INTERNAL REVIEW - RK&K
ENGINEERING - RK&K
APPROVAL
PERMITS I BID I CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT
PROJECT
NSRR AND CREEKS • VANCEBORO
HDD
ALIGNMENT SHEET
.aPPIw WIG LLP SCALE
aas cmna n. uortrx, sutrz loz „. t' = 7 [
TEST DATA couwxo. Na. zeozs
umrsc f T-onz
TESTED FROM STATION: TO STATION: ICE 1oC-ie2-26i6
MEDIUM: RECORD TEST PRESSURE: psig RK&K COM. NO. 009-100
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS AFE N0. 31
PROFILE
1 too'
REFERENCE SECTION
INFORMATION PROVIDED BY
JOB NO. - 1561-10-107 - 10/8/2010
ACEIVE®
FEB 2 1 2011
L�6�j�a��la
Topsoil
SC/SM, Clayey Sand
SM, Silty Sand
SP/SM, Poorly—graded
Sand with Silt
Fill
Sandy Clay
SC, Clayey Sand
Silty Clay
SP/SC, Poorly—graded
Sand with Clay
PRELIMINARY
ISSUED FOR PERMITTING
PURPOSES ONLY
'Piedmont
Natural Ga
SHEET DESCRIPTION
PLAN & PROFILE SHEET
MAULS SWAMP CROSSING
STA 9+96 TO STA 13+41
PNG-VB-M I
REVISION: Q

REFERE149E TION
A
r
"GAS" SDE ABE ED
'C
GAS
FLUSHGRADE WITH l
GRADE it
COMPACTED SOIL TRACER WIRE TO REMAIN
CONTINUOUS IN TEST BOX.
COIL 24' MIN. OF SLACK IN TEST BOX.
CONTINUITY OF PLASTIC VALVE BOX (SCREW IYPE)
VALVEBOX AO TAPE AROUND WITH CAST IRON COVER 30' MIN.
V
18'
TRACER WIRE
WARNING CAS MAIN
TAPE
CONCRETE OR WOOD BLOCK
PE GAS VALVE BEARING ON UNDISTURBED SOIL
OR SOIL COMPACTED TO 95 % DENSITY.
NOTE:
WHEN VALVE AND LOCATING STATION ARE CALLED OUT AT ONE STATION
THE VALVE BOX IS ALSO USED AS THE LOCATING STATION,
VALVE BOX DETAIL
WARNINGeL
GAS
PIPELINE
PHONE
1-0]PHONE J25
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
111 CORPORATE LANE
NEW BERN, N.C. 7.8562
4' -6 -
EXISTING GRADE
2'-6'
LINE MARKER
LOCATIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS BEFORE INSTALLATION
LINE MARKER (SIGN) DETAIL
Mai
2 Oft
S
REVISION SECTION
DATE REV. DESCRIPTION BY
2 18 11 0 ISSUED FOR PERMITTING DAW
TEST T
LOCATION!
OATS: DURATION:
PRESSURE:
CONTRACTOR: WITNESS:
NOTES
PRELIMINARY
ISSUED FOR PERMITTING
PURPOSES ONLY
MATERIALS LIST
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY.
llv" L.0nP�P6R LLP
coxcgm. u.c. 2Aoxs
�ftws camcx n. xaml smE ioz
U,! T -a112
PHONE 704-TTR-2423
DESIGNED BY: JAS
DRAWN BY: JAS
CHECKED BY: DAW
RK&K COM, NO. 809-100 DATE
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS AFE NO.31 21TB/1T
SCALE: NTS
r6111Piedmont
Natural Gas
SHEET DESCRIPTION
MISCELLANEOUS PE DETAILS
DRAWING: PNG-VB-D001 REV SIGN: 0

- 9LT FENCE (DENR 8.52) O
INCOC•ATIM
MATERIAI S
1. USE A SYNMERC FILTER FABRIC OF AT LEAST 95% BY WEIGHT OF POLYOLEFINS OR
POLYESTER. WHICH IS CERTIFIED BY THE MANUFACTURE OR SUPPLIER AS CONFORMING TO
THE REQUIREMENTS IN ASTM D 6461, WHICH IS SHOWN IN PART IN TABLE 6.52b.
5EEanCAFONS FOR SEDIMENT FENCE FABRIC
TEST MATERIAL UNITS SUPPORTED' UN—SUPPORTED- TYPE OF
SILT FENCE SILT FENCE VALUE
CRAB STRENGTHASTM D 4632 N (Ibs.)
MACHINE DIRECTION 00 (0 MARV
X—MACHINE 400 450 MARV
(90) (90)
PERMITTIVITY ASTM D 4491s
ec—I 0.05 0.05 MARV
APPARENT OPINING SIZE- ASTM 0 4751 mm 0.60 0.80 MAX. ARV'
(US SIEVE ,y) (30) (30)
7. 70% AFTER 70% AFTER
ULTRAVIOLET STABILITY ASTM D 4355 RETAINED 500, OF SODh OF TYPICAL
STRENGTH EXPOSURE EXPOSURE
SILT FENCE SUPPORT SHALL CONSIST OF 14 CAGE STEEL WARE WITH A MESH SPACING OF
150 mm (6 INCHES), OR PREFABRICATED POYLMER MESH OF EQUIVALENT STRENGTH.
THESE DEFAULT VALUES ARE BASED ON EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE WITH A VARIETY OF SEDIMENT.
FOR ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS, A RENEW OF PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE AND/OR SITE OR
REGIONALLY SPECIFIC GEOTEXTILE TESTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH TEST METHOD D 5141 SHOULD
BE PERFORMED BY THE AGENCY TO CONFIRM SUITABILITY OF THESE REQUIRMENTS.
s AS MEASURED IN ACCORDANCE NTH TEST METHOD D 4632-
2. SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRIC SHALL CONTAIN ULTRAVIOLET RAY
INHIBITORS AND STABILIZERS TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 6 MONTHS OF
EXPECTED USABLE CONSTRUCTION LIFE AT A TEMPERATURE RANGE OF
0 F TO 120' F.
3. IF STEEL POSTS (STANDARD v OR -T- SECTION) ARE UTILIZED FOR SILT
FENCE CONSTRUCTION, THEY MUST HAVE A MINIMUM WEIGHT OF 1.33 POUNDS
PER UNEARFOOT AND SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM LENGTH OF 5 FEET AND
SHALL HAVE PROJECTIONS FOR FASTENING FABRIC,
4. WIRE FENCE REINFORCEMENT FOR SILT FENCES USING STANDARD—STRENGTH
FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE A MINIMUM 14 GAUGE AND SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM
MESH SPACING OF 6 INCHES
INSTALLATION
1. CONSTRUCT THE SEDIMENT BARRIER OF STANDARD STRENGTH OR EXTRA
STRENGTH SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRICS.
2. ENSURE THAT THE HEIGHT OF THE SEDIMENT FENCE DOES NOT EXCEED 24 INCHES
ABOVE THE GROUND SURFACE. (HIGHER FENCES MAY IMPOUND VOLUMES OF WATER
SUFFICENT TO COUSE FAILURE OF THE STRUCTURE).
3. CONSTRUCT THE FILTER FABRIC FROM A CONTINUOUS ROLL CUT TO THE LENGTH
OF THE BARRIER TO AVOID JOINTS. WHEN JOINTS ARE NECESSARY, SECURELY FASTEN
THE FILTER CLOTH ONLY AT A SUPPORT POST WITH 4 FEET MINIMUM OVERLAP TO
THE NEXT POST.
4. SUPPORT STANDARD STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC BY WARE MESH FASTENED SECURELY TO
THE UPSLOPE SIDE OF THE POSTS EXTEND THE WARE MESH SUPPORT TO THE BOTTOM
OF THE TRENCH. FASTEN THE WIRE REINFORCEMENT, THEN FABRIC ON THE UPSLOPE SIDE
OF THE FENCE POST. WIRE OR PLASTIC ZIP TES SHOULD HAVE MINIMUM 50 POUNDS
TENSILE STRENGTH.
5. WHEN A WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE IS USED, SPACE POSTS A MAXIMUM OF B FEET
APART. SUPPORT POSTS SHOULD BE DRIVEN SECURELY INTO THE GROUND A MINIMUM
OF 24 INCHES.
B. EXTRA STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC WITH 6 FEET POST SPACING DOES NOT REQUIRE WIRE
MESH SUPPORT FENCE. SECURELY FASTEN THE FILTER FABRIC DIRECTLY TO POSTS.
WIRE OR PLASTIC ZIP TIES SHOULD HAVE MINIMUM 50 POUNDS TENSILE STRENGTH.
7. EXCAVATE A TRENCH APPROXIMATELY 4 INCHES WIDE AND 8 INCHES DEEP ALONG
THE PROPOSED UNE OF POSTS AND UPSLOPE FROM THE BARRIER.
8. PLACE 12 INCHES OF THE FABRIC ALONG THE BOTTOM AND SIDE OF THE TRENCH.
9. BACKFILL THE TRENCH WITH SOIL PLACED OVER THE FILTER FABRIC AND COMPACT.
THOROUGH COMPACTION OF THE BACKFILL IS CRITICAL TO SILT FENCE PERFORMANCE.
10. DO NOT ATTACH FILTER FABRIC TO EXISTING TREES.
MAMIEMMR:E
1. INSPECT SEDIMENT FENCES AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL MAKE ANY
REQUIRED REPAIRS IMMEDIATELY.
2. SHOULD THE FABRIC OF A SEDIMENT FENCE COLLAPSE TEAR, DECOMPOSE OR BECOME
INEFFECTIVE. REPLACE IT PROMPTLY.
S. REMOVE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORAGE VOLUME
FOR THE NEXT RAIN AND TO REDUCE PRESSURE ON THE FENCE TAKE CARE TO AVOID
UNDERMINING ME FENCE DURING CLEANOUT.
4. REMOVE ALL FENCING MATERIALS AND UNSTABLE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AND BRING THE
AREA TO GRADE AND STABIUZE IT AFTER THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN
PROPERLY STABILIZED.
STEEL POST
MAX. STANDARD STRENGTH FABRIC WITH WIRE FENCE
MAX. EXTRA STRENGTH FABRIC WITHOUT WIRE FENCE
WIRE
8' DOWN & 4'
FORWARD ALON(
THE TRENCH
WTA11A7 M DETAL OF A 9LT FMM
FLOW FROM
DI TURB�ED kEq
FILTER FABRIC STEEL POST
NATURAL GROUND
r= '1
ddk BACKFILL TRENCH
2I, AND COMPACT
4=" THOROUGHLY
MIN.
TRENCH OF A 9LT FDIC£
NgTURAL
GROUND
SEED AND MULCH O
ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITION OR BETTER,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO:
1, PREPARATION OF THE GROUND: FINE GRADE ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO THEIR
ORIGINAL CONTOURS, INSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE IF NEEDED AND REMOVE
ALL ROCKS AND DEBRIS.
2. DISTRIBUTE FERTILIZERS: ADD THE FOLLOWING FERTILIZERS TO THE GROUND AS
NEEDED AND MIX WITH THE SOIL TD A DEPTH OF 4' TO 6- BY DISKING
OR OTHER APPROVED METHOD.
A.GROUND AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE (FINE) 2 tons/ocre
B. 10-10-10800 Ibs/acre
3. SEED MIXTURE: DISTRIBUTE SEED AS DESCRIBED BELOW:
A. AUGUST 16 TO APRIL 30
KENTUCKY 31 FESCUE 80 Ibs/ocre
RYE GRAIN 40 Ibs/ocr
SERICEA LESPEDEZA 20 Ibs/ocre
KOBE LESPEDEZA 10 Ibs/acre
B. MAY 1 TO AUGUST 15
KENTUCKY 31 FESCUE 80 Ibs/ocre
SERICEA LESPEDEZA 20 Ibs/acre
RYE GRAIN 15 Ibs/acre
GERMAN MILLET 15 Ibs/acre
4. MULCH: MULCH THE ENTRE ARE WITH A DRY STRAW (PREFERABLY WHEAT)
FREE OF NOXIOUS WEEDS. MULCH SHALL NOT BE MUSTY. MOLDY, CAKED.
DECAYED OR DUST AND SHALL BE REASONABLY BRIGHT IN COLOR. WHERE
NEED. TACK MULCH WITH AN EMULSIFIED ASPHALT AT THE RATE OF
D.10 CAL/SQ. YD. OR 10 GAL. PER 1,000 SQ. FT. RYE CRAIN IS
ACCEPTABLE AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR TACKING WHERE APPROVED FROM
AUGUST 10 TO NOVEMBER 1 WHEN AN ADDITIONAL 15 LBS/ACRE IS
APPLIED PRIOR TO THE APPLICATION OF MULCH.
5. SEED AND MULCH SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS FOLLOWING
COMPLETION OF PIPE INSTALLATION.
REFERENCE SECTION
REVISION SECTION
LOCATION:
DATE DURATION:
PRESSURE:
CONTRACTOR: WITNESS:
NOTES
RECEIVED
FEB 911 mo
PRELIMINARY
ISSUED FOR PERMITTING
PURPOSES ONLY
MATERIALS LIST
�o1 '" rvic ii aurin — DESIGNED BY: -AS
eas cHuacu sT. uocnL arrE Aoz
1 `collzsozs DRAWN BY: J45
FHDNE T06 -T42-2426 CHECKED BY: SAW
2K&K COM. NO. 809-100 $CALF NTS
'IEDMONT NATURAL GAS AFE NO. 31 2/1B/11
r6111 Piedmont
Natural Gas
SHEET DESCRIPTION
EROSION & SEDIMENTATION
CONTROL DETAILS
PNG-VB-DO02

Ame K
FEB 2 9. 2019
mtrowd Dow,
ATTACHMENT B: OWNER STATEMENTS, RETURN
RECEIPTS AND AUTHORIZED AGENT FORM

ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER STATEMENT x.,
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to Piedmont Natural Gas
(Name of Property Owner)
project A j e IRT'
VCU located at Farm Life ltt-�M
(Lot, Block, Road, etc.)
f�u�k'IeY�' t3 rrah c h
on,in Vanceboro
(Waterbody)
Applicant's phone #: [phone]
(Town and/or County)
Mailing Address:
111 Corporate Lane
New Bern, NC 28562
e�AM
FEB 2 1 201l
N.C.
He has described to me, as shown below, the development he is proposing at that location, and, I
have no objections to his proposal.
DESCRIPTION AND/OR DRAWING OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT:
(To be filled in by property owner proposing development)
Please see the attached drawing. The applicant is proposing to install a
4 -inch natur as ip line within the Farm Life Road right-of-way and
�aY�-1 �irfnaf�
beneath the his notification is required as part of the Coastal
Area Management Act permit necessary for the project.
For questions regarding the project please contact Bill Snyder at the phone
number below or [e-mail]. RK&K are the engineers on the project and
are Piedmont Natural Gas' authorized agent.
(Information for Property Owner Applying
for Permit)
RK&K
845 Church St. N, Suite 104
Mailing Address
(Riparian Property Owner Information)
IS�
Signature
Concord, NC [3 -Taj lo `C J or tk Q h
City/State/Zip Print or Type Name
704-782-2426 7 52 _2 ,L �l_ Ur O 7 d
Telephone Nu ber •G T i Telephone Number
1z /D
ignature a e Date
RK&K is an authorized agent for Piedmont Natural Gas.

ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER STATEMENT
FEB 2 g 201
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to Piedmont Natural Gas ?�t�6�t66'iAl
(Name of Property Owner)
project
3x)Woft located at Streets Ferry Road and Main Street/Business US 17
a
(Lot, Block, Road, etc.)
on Swift Creek in Vanceboro N.C.
(Waterbody) (Town and/or County)
Applicant's phone #: [phone] Mailing Address: 111 Corporate Lane
New Bern, NC 28562
He has described to me, as shown below, the development he is proposing at that location, and, I
have no objections to his proposal.
DESCRIPTION AND/OR DRAWING OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT:
(To be filled in by property owner proposing development)
Please see the attached drawing. The applicant is proposing to install a
4 -inch natural gas pipeline within the Streets Ferry Road right-of-way and
beneath Swift Creek. This notification is required as part of the Coastal
Area Management Act permit necessary for the project.
For questions regarding the project please contact Bill Snyder at the phone
number below or [e-mail]. RK&K are the engineers on the project and
are Piedmont Natural Gas' authorized agent.
(Information for Property Owner Applying
for Permit)
RK&K
845 Church St. N, Suite 104
Mailing Address
Concord, NC
City/State/Zip
704-782-2426
---------------------------------
(Riparian Property Owner Information)
Signature
Print or Type Name
ZSz.- Z 4 1/- z yS"z
Telephone N tuber Telephone Number
l --V — /2j �o / 2 -- // - /D
Signature Date Date
RK&K is an authorized agent for Piedmont Natural Gas.

DEC 0 1 2,010
&n.
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER STATEMENf 09OR,D
4:
FEB 2 1 2,011
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to Piedmont Natural Gas �n
(Name of Property Owner) �Ivmvrsilafg'dt ryaew
project
1p4vftlocated at Streets Ferry Road and Main Street/Business US 17
(Lot, Block, Road, etc.)
on Swift Creek ,in Vanceboro N.C.
(Waterbody) (Town and/or County)
Applicant's phone #: [phone] Mailing Address: 111 Corporate Lane
New Bern, NC 28562
He has described to me, as shown below, the development he is proposing at that location, and, I
have no objections to his proposal.
DESCRIPTION AND/OR DRAWING OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT:
(To be filled in by property owner proposing development)
Please see the attached drawing. The applicant is proposing to install a
4 -inch natural gas pipeline within the Streets Ferry Road right-of-way and
beneath Swift Creek. This notification is required as part of the Coastal
Area Management Act permit necessary for the project.
For questions regarding the project please contact Bill Snyder at the phone
number below or [e-mail]. RK&K are the engineers on the project and
are Piedmont Natural Gas' authorized agent.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Information for Property Owner Applying (Riparian Property Owner
for Permit)
RK&K
845 Church St. N, Suite 104
Mailing Address
Concord, NC
City/State/Zip
704-782-2426
Signature
Z/ J
Print or Type Name
Z. Z-Z3e,--4--0C-�)
TelephoneN tuber -Z / /.:-- - q — /0 Telephone Number/ 3110
Signature Date Date
RK&K is an authorized agent for Piedmont Natural Gas.

4��tr�l��tYi
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER STATEMENT
FEB 2 1 2011
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to Piedmont Natural Gas Morshoud ry/UCM
(Name of Property Owner)
project
w� located at Mill Pond Road
on Mauls Swamp
(Waterbody)
Applicant's phone #: [phone]
(Lot, Block, Road, etc.)
in Vanceboro
(Town and/or County)
Mailing Address: 111 Corporate Lane
New Bern, NC 28562
N.C.
He has described to me, as shown below, the development he is proposing at that location, and, I
have no objections to his proposal.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION AND/OR DRAWING OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT:
(To be filled in by property owner proposing development)
Please see the attached drawing. The applicant is proposing to install a
4 -inch natural gas pipeline within the Mill Pond Road right-of-way and
beneath Mauls Swamp. This notification is required as part of the Coastal
Area Management Act permit necessary for the project.
For questions regarding the project please contact Bill Snyder at the phone
number below or wsnydererkk.com. RK&K are the engineers on the project and
are Piedmont Natural Gas' authorized agent.
(Information for Property Owner Applying
for Permit)
RK&K
845 Church St. N, Suite 104
Mailing Address
Concord, NC
City/State/Zip
(Riparian Property Owner Information)
Signature
Print or Type Name
704-782-2426 5
.2 _ 7 �� i5 5t (1
Telephone Number V Telephone Number
/J -1.7 1 l2/3/ D QeCeMbe� alao/b
Signature Date Date
RK&K is an authorized agent for Piedmont Natural Gas.

FEB 21 2011
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3, Also complete
4 Delivery Is desired.
A. Sign;re M'
Agent
��
Item if Restricted
X `'" Addressee
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
B. Received by (Printed Name) , C. Date of Delivery
or on the front if space permits. _. —
ddress different from Item 1? Q Yes
Town of Vanceboro
,r delivery address below: ❑ No
Chad E. Braxton
P.O. Box 306
Vanceboro, NC 28586
le
I]Pdertified Mail ❑Tess Mail
❑ Registered grReturn Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail, ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number 7009
1680 0000 0888 0816
(Transfer from, service label)
PSForm 381. 1, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-W54e

Allow
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor James H. Gregson, Director Dee Freeman, Secretary
Date 1a November 2010
Name of Property Owner Applying for Permit:
Piedmont Natural Gas, Inc,
Mailing Address:
111 Corporate Lane
New Bern, NC 28562
I certify that I have authorized (Agent) Rummel, Klepper and Kahl, LLP
to act on my
behalf, for the purpose of applying for and obtaining all LAMA Permits necessary to
install or construct (activity) a 4 -inch natural gas pipeline beneath Swift Creek
--Z)aT ROW
at (iny-praper# 1nrAtPr1 Wit) Streets Ferry Rd. and U9 17/Main St. in Vanceboro, NC
Additional Locations:
Unnamed Creek crossing Farmlife Ave, in Vanceboro, NCI
Mauls swamp at Alligator Rd. in Vanceboro, NC.
This certification is valid thru (date) 31 January 2011
Ir
t- j
e -/e C'f—ftp� Owner Signature
400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] PAX: 252-247-33301 Internet: www,nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper
Acme",
FEB 2 3 2011

AGRAIN FEES 2 1 2011
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resourcesr°��''
Division of Coastal Management
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor James H. Gregson, Director Dee Freeman, Secretary
Date .21February 2011
Name of Property Owner Applying for Permit:
Piedmont Natural Gas, Inc.
Mailing Address:
111 Corporate Lane
New Bern, NC 28562
I certify that I have authorized (agent) Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP
to act on my
behalf, for the purpose of applying for and obtaining all CAMA Permits necessary to
install or construct (activity) a g -inch natural gas pipeline beneath Swift Creek
NCDOT ROW
at (my4xrape31y located at) Streets Ferry Rd. and US 17/Main St. in Vanceboro, NC
Additional Locations!
Unnamed creek crossing Farmlife Avenue in Vanceboro, NC;
Mauls Swamp at Mill Farm Rd. in Vanceboro, NC.
This cergfwadon is valid thru (date) 30 June 2011
UV/
VvDparAy Owner Signature
Project
400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled t M Post Consumer Paper

RK x
FEB�.
2 2011
MoroilocidMyO U�
ATTACHMENT C: USACE PRE -CONSTRUCTION
NOTIFICATION FORM AND JURISDICTIONAL
INVESTIGATION REPORT

'. t?ECER %
OF W A TF9
Office Use Only: FEB 2 1 2019
h Corps action ID no.
o DWQ project no. M01110WA
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
El Section 404 Permit ®Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
® Yes ❑ No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
N Yes
❑ No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
N Yes
❑ No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Vanceboro Natural Gas Pipeline HDD
2b. County:
Craven
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Vanceboro
2d. Subdivision name:
N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.i.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Piedmont Natural Gas, Inc.
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
N/A - Project is within NCDOT right-of-way.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
111 Corporate Lane
3e. City, state, zip:
New Bern, NC 28562
3f. Telephone no.:
252-639-7225
3g. Fax no.:
252-638-4718
3h. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: FEB 20
4b. Name:
Same as Owner
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
845 Church Street North, Suite 102
5d. City, state, zip:
Concord, NC 28025
5e. Telephone no.:
704-782-2426
5f. Fax no.:
704-782-2489
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
9-11

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1-046-069
Latitude: 35.296867 Longitude: -
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
77.149061
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
N/A acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Swift Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C; Sw, NSW
2c. River basin:
Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The current site conditions vary from wooded to suburban in nature. Land use is undeveloped woodlands to individual
residences and businesses.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
N/A
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
N/A
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the pipeline crossings is to add natural gas distribution capacity in Vanceboro.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed pipeline will be medium density polyethylene (MDPE), SDR 11.5, 4 -inch diameter pipe. The natural gas
pipeline will be installed beneath the water bodies by horizontal directional drilling (HDD) methods. No land disturbance
or construction activities will occur within the banks or adjacent wetlands of any water bodies. Additionally, the pipeline
will be located at depth of twenty-three feet beneath the bottom of Swift Creek and no drill entry or exit location will be
closer than 100 feet to any stream bank. Please refer to the attached plan sheets for the specific installation profiles at
each proposed crossing.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
® Yes [INo ElUnknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: RK&K
Name (if known):
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
August 2010, See attached report.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
A North Carolina CAMA permit is being requested concurrenty with this notification.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Future Project Plans IM
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No G 2P
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

FEB 2 1 2011
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments: No Impacts
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments: No Impacts
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

'DECEIVED
FFR 9, 1 ?011
4. Open Water Impacts " 7
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P[IT
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑ PEI T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: No Impacts
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled I Excavated Flooded Filled I Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments: N/A
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
Project is in which protected basin?
6b. 6c. 6d.
Buffer impact
number - Reason
Permanent (P) or for
Temporary T impact
B1 ❑P❑T
B2 ❑P❑T
B3 ❑P❑T
6i. Comments: No Impacts
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico F-1 Other:
F1 Catawba El Randleman
6e. I 6f. I 6g.
Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
required?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation FEB
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
N/A
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The proposed pipeline will be medium density polyethylene (MDPE), SDR 11.5, 4 -inch diameter pipe. The natural gas
pipeline will be installed beneath the water bodies by horizontal directional drilling (HDD) methods. No land disturbance or
construction activities will occur within the banks or adjacent wetlands of any water bodies. Additionally, the pipeline will be
located at depth of twenty-three feet beneath the bottom of Swift Creek and no drill entry or exit location will be closer than
100 feet to any stream bank. Please refer to the attached plan sheets for the specific installation profiles at each proposed
crossing.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

G���i
EER 9 y
E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: There is minimal disturbance associated
with the project and no impervious surfaces are being installed.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
N/A
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ 0 R
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

FEB 2 1_ 011
F.
Supplementary Information:�rj�
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments.-
omments:2.
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
�Q'p

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) FEB 2 1 2
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
El Yes ®NorE��i
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
® Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
See attached report
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
See attached report
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? See attached report
J
-2- iI
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent' ignature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
0

RK
QECEIRE-�,
I=EB 21 201,
u"mhos, nr,voev
ATTACHMENT D: JURISDICTIONAL INVESTIGATION
REPORT

r .
Nam,
FEES 2 J ?Ott
Junsdictional and Protccted Spe*_)rV) dr7y0V_r,�il
Imestigation Rc;port
Vancchoro, Nord) Carolina
A LI1''Wd 22010
Jurisdictional Investigation Report
Vanceboro, North Carolina
Piedmont Natural Gas
August 2010
INTRODUCTION
There are three study locations situated in Vanceboro, Craven County, North Carolina;
Streets Ferry Road Bridge over Swift Creek, Farmlife Avenue crossing of UT to Mauls
Swamp, and Mill Pond Road over Mauls Swamp. Piedmont Natural Gas proposes to
construct a directionally bored gas line beneath the jurisdictional resources at each of the
study locations (Figure 1).
BACKGROUND & EXISTING CONDITIONS
Prior to field investigations, the Craven County, NC Soil Survey was reviewed to identify
hydric soils within the study area. The Vanceboro, NC USGS 7.5 minute Quadrangle
map, US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetland Inventory (NWI) Map,
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM),
and aerial photography were reviewed to identify the location, extent, and types of
jurisdictional (wetlands and streams) found within the study area.
Topography: The topographic relief of the study area ranges from approximately 2 to
18 feet (NAVD83) (Figure 1). The topography in the study area is characterized as
floodplain and associated interstream divides, and is located within the central portion of
the Coastal Plain Physiographic Province.
Soils: The Craven County Soil Survey indicates that six soil units are present within the
study area; Altavista fine sandy loam (AaA), Craven silt loam (CrB), Lenoir silt loam
(Le), Masontown mucky fine sandy loam/Muckalee sandy loam (MM), Seabrook loamy
sand (Se), and Tarboro sand (TaB). Map unit MM soils are all hydric soils or have
hydric soils as a major component. Map units Le and Se contain inclusions of hydric
soils or have wet spots. Soil mapping for the study area is shown in Figure 2.
Wetlands and Waters of the United States: The National Wetland Inventory (NWI)
map for the study area indicates the presence of four wetland types; Palustrine, Forested,
Broad -Leaved Deciduous, Temporarily Flooded (PFOIA), Palustrine, Forested, Broad -
Leaved Deciduous, Seasonally Flooded (PFO1C) Palustrine, Forested, Deciduous,
Semipermanently Flooded (PFO6F), and Riverine, Lower Perinnial, Unconsolidated
Bottom, Permanently Flooded (R2UBH), within the study area boundary (Figure 2).

4ECEPA®
Jurisdictional and Protectee ypecies
'I p
Investigation RePFEB 21 2011
Vanceboro, North Carolina
AugLlStwmawmnew
Floodplains: According to Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) data the
study area is located within the floodway as well as the 100 -year and 500 -year floodplain
of Swift Creek and Mauls Swamp (Figure 3).
METHODOLOGY
An investigation to determine the potential presence of wetlands and waters of the United
States was conducted in accordance with the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation
Manual (Environmental Laboratory, 1987) using the routine on-site method and
supplemental guidance (Wetland Determination Data Form — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal
Plain Region) issued by the Corps. The manual outlines a three -parameter approach to
delineating wetlands. All three parameters (hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and
hydrology) must be evident for the area to be considered a jurisdictional wetland, unless
the site has been disturbed or is considered a problem area. Animal species observed
during the field surveys were identified by using the following: Martof et. al., 1980,
Potter et. al., 1980, Rohde et. al., 1994, Sibley 2001, and Webster 1985.
Hydrophytic Vegetation: Plant species in the study area were identified using
appropriate taxonomic keys and field guides (Weakley, 2005 draft and Radford et al
1968). The wetland indicator status for each species identified was determined from The
National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northeast (Region 1), (Reed,
1988). This publication assigns indicator statuses to the approximately 6,000 species of
plants that commonly occur in wetlands and uplands in the Northeastern United States.
A species assigned an indicator status of UPI, (Upland) almost always appears in an
upland habitat. A species assigned an indicator status of FACU (Facultative Upland)
typically appears in uplands two thirds of the time and in wetlands one third of the time.
A FAC (Facultative) indicator status is evidence that the subject plant is equally likely to
occur in wetlands or uplands. A species assigned an indicator status of FACW
(Facultative Wetland) will typically be found in wetlands about two thirds of the time,
while appearing in uplands about one third of the time. A species assigned an indicator
status of OBL (Obligate) is almost always found in wetlands. Greater than 50 percent
FAC, FACW, or OBL species must be present for the area to meet the hydrophytic
vegetation criteria of a Corps of Engineers jurisdictional wetland.
Hydrologic Indicators: Areas with evident characteristics of wetland hydrology are
those where the presence of water has an overriding influence on characteristics of
vegetation and soils due to anaerobic and reducing conditions. Indicators of wetland
hydrology include drainage patterns, drift lines, sediment deposition, watermarks, stream
gauge data and flood predictions, historic records, visual observation of saturated soils,
and visual observation of inundation. Presence of these indicators is necessary for the
area to meet the hydrology criteria of a Corps of Engineers jurisdictional wetland.
Hydric Soils: Indicators of hydric soils observed in the project area were noted during
the field investigation. Indicators of hydric soils include the presence of histosols
(organic soils), histic epipedons (a surface horizon of saturated organic rich soil), sulfidic
odor, reducing conditions, gleyed or low-chroma colors, concretions, and high organic
OA

r ,
fir MECEIVEV
Jurisdictional and Protected S
1n�ecti-alion �t 21 2011
Vanceboro, North ('arohna
AAI
content or organic streaking in sandy soil. Hydric soils typically exhibit a matrix chroma
of one (1) or less in unmottled soils or matrix chroma of two (2) or less in mottled soils
immediately below the A horizon or ten inches (whichever is shallower) using Munsell
Soil Color Charts on non -sandy soils (X -Rite, 2000 revised). Indicators of hydric soils
are necessary for the area to meet the criteria of a Corps of Engineers jurisdictional
wetland.
RESULTS
The field investigation to determine the potential presence of wetlands and/or waters of
the United States, as well as, identify any potential impacts to federally protected species,
was conducted by Pete Stafford and Hal Bain (RKK staff members) on August 18, 2010.
Jurisdictional Areas
The wetland (swamp community, Figure 4a ) associated with Swift Creek at the Streets
Ferry Road Bridge crossing is dominated by Bald cypress (Taxodium distichum), Red
maple (Acer rubmin), Sycamore (Platamcs occidentalis), Overcup oak (Quercus lyrata),
Possumhaw (Viburnum nudum), Sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis), Lizard's tail
(Sazcrurus cernzcus), and Poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans). This area exists in the
floodplain of Swift Creek.
The perennial stream (SA) associated with the crossing of Farmlife Avenue is a UT to
Mauls Swamp (Figure 4b). This top of bank to top of bank feature is primarily bounded
by lawns dominated by Centipede grass (Eremochloa sp.). Sunfish (Lepomis spp.),
Mosquito fish (Gambusia sp.), Damsel fly larvae (Suborder Zygoptera) and crayfish
(family Cambaridae) were evident in pools. The stream channel exhibits a well
developed/moderately stable bed and bank. Channel depth ranges from 3-6 feet and
channel width ranges from 2-4 feet. Water depth ranged from 3.0 inches in riffles to 16.0
inches in pools. Moderate/clear flow was present on August 18, 2010.
The Wetland (Cypress ponded community) associated with Mauls Swamp at the Mill
Pond Road crossing (Figure 4c) is dominated by Bald cypress (Taxodium distichum),
buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis), Wax myrtle (Morella cerifera), Jewelweed
(Impatiens capensis), False nettle (Boehmaria cylindrical), and Duckweed (Lemna
minor). Several aquatic turtles [Chrysemys spp. and Spotted turtle (Clemmys guttata)]
were present during the site visit. This area exists in the floodplain of Mauls Swamp and
1-5 feet of water covered this area on August 18, 2010.
Two (2) wetland boundaries (flags WA 1-12 and WB 1-10) were delineated within the
project study area (Table 1.0). One (1) stream feature (flags SA 1-12) was delineated in
the project study area. These jurisdictional boundaries were identified in the field using
pink/black stripe flagging, and wetland features (WA and WB) were located using hand
held GPS. Stream SA was not located with GPS as it is a distinct, top of bank to top of
bank, stream feature.
ki

Acew;
Jurisdictional and hotcmcd SFFEE 2 H 2011
Imestigati�m Report
Vanceboro. Vorth �myIx"U'
AM,Hq 'MO
Table 1
* PFO6F - Palustrine, Forested, Broadleaved Deciduous, Saturated
PFO2F - Palustrine, Forested, Needle -Leaved Deciduous, Semipermanently Flooded
R2UBH - Riverine, Lower Perinnial, Unconsolidated Bottom, Permanently Flooded
Wetland floodplain feature WA is adjacent to and abutting Swift Creek. Soils exhibited
low chroma and mottles. Wetland hydrology indicators present at the site included; water
marks, water -stained leaves, high water table, saturation, drift deposits, and oxidized
rhizospheres on living roots. It appears that this wetland feature derives hydrological
input primarily from overbank flooding.
Wetland feature (WB) is part of the Mauls Swamp floodplain complex. Soils exhibited
low chroma and the presence of muck. Wetland hydrology indicators present at the site
included; water marks, surface water, high water table, saturation, aquatic fauna and
rhizospheres on living roots. It appears that this wetland feature derives hydrological
input primarily from overbank flooding.
No Impacts to jurisdictional surface waters or wetlands are anticipated as a result of
project construction.
Federally Protected Species
As of August 16, 2010 the USFWS lists 7 federally protected species for Craven County
(Table 2). A brief description of each species' habitat requirements follows, along with
the Biological Conclusion rendered based on survey results in the study area. Habitat
requirements for each species are based on the current best available information as per
referenced literature and USFWS correspondence. No Impacts to federally protected
species are anticipated as a result of project construction.
M
NWI Classification
Delineated
Flag
Area Designation
as determined in the
Areas
Numbers
Field
WA
Bottomland Hardwood
PFO6F*, R2UBH*
1-12
WB
Cypress Swamp
PFO2F
1-10
Perennial coastal plain
SA
stream
R2UBH
1-12
* PFO6F - Palustrine, Forested, Broadleaved Deciduous, Saturated
PFO2F - Palustrine, Forested, Needle -Leaved Deciduous, Semipermanently Flooded
R2UBH - Riverine, Lower Perinnial, Unconsolidated Bottom, Permanently Flooded
Wetland floodplain feature WA is adjacent to and abutting Swift Creek. Soils exhibited
low chroma and mottles. Wetland hydrology indicators present at the site included; water
marks, water -stained leaves, high water table, saturation, drift deposits, and oxidized
rhizospheres on living roots. It appears that this wetland feature derives hydrological
input primarily from overbank flooding.
Wetland feature (WB) is part of the Mauls Swamp floodplain complex. Soils exhibited
low chroma and the presence of muck. Wetland hydrology indicators present at the site
included; water marks, surface water, high water table, saturation, aquatic fauna and
rhizospheres on living roots. It appears that this wetland feature derives hydrological
input primarily from overbank flooding.
No Impacts to jurisdictional surface waters or wetlands are anticipated as a result of
project construction.
Federally Protected Species
As of August 16, 2010 the USFWS lists 7 federally protected species for Craven County
(Table 2). A brief description of each species' habitat requirements follows, along with
the Biological Conclusion rendered based on survey results in the study area. Habitat
requirements for each species are based on the current best available information as per
referenced literature and USFWS correspondence. No Impacts to federally protected
species are anticipated as a result of project construction.
M

Jurisdictional and Protected Spucie
ln�estigation Repoai
Vanceboru, \nrth Carolina
August 1010
Table 2. Federally protected species listed for Craven County.
Scientific Name
Common Name
Federal
Status
Habitat
Present
Biological
Conclusion
Aeschynomene virginica
Sensitive joint -vetch
T*
No
No Effect
Lysimachia asperulifolia
Rough -leafed loosestrife
E
No
No Effect
Alligator mississippiensis
American alligator
T (S/A)
Yes
Not Required
Dermochelys coriacea
Leatherback seaturtle
E
No
No Effect
Haliaeetus leucocephalits
Bald eagle
BGPA
Yes
No Effect
Picoides borealis
Red -cockaded woodpecker
E
Yes
No Effect
Trichechus manatus
West Indian manatee
E
No
No Effect
E - Endangered
T - Threatened
T(S/A) - Threatened due to similarity of appearance
BGPA - Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
* Historic- the species was last observed in the county more than 50 years ago.
Bald eagle
A large raptor, the bald eagle has a wingspread of about 7 feet. Adults have a dark brown
body and wings, white head and tail, and a yellow beak. Juveniles are mostly brown with
white mottling on the body, tail, and undersides of wings. Adult plumage usually is
obtained by the 6th year. In flight, the bald eagle often soars or glides with the wings held
at a right angle to the body.
Habitat Description: The Bald Eagle prefers habitats near seacoasts, rivers, large lakes,
oceans, and other large bodies of open water with an abundance of fish. Studies
have shown a preference for bodies of water with a circumference greater than
11 km (7 mi), and lakes with an area greater than 10 square kilometers (4 sq mi)
are optimal for breeding bald eagles.
The Bald Eagle requires old-growth and mature stands of coniferous or hardwood
trees for perching, roosting, and nesting. Selected trees must have good visibility,
an open structure, and proximity to prey, but the height or species of tree is not as
important as an abundance of comparatively large trees surrounding the body of
water. Forests used for nesting should have a canopy cover of no more than 60
percent, and no less than 20 percent, and be in close proximity to water.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect. Large bodies of water, capable of supporting
foraging Bald eagles, are not present within 1 mile of the project study area. No impacts
to Bald eagles or its habitat will result from project construction.
Red -cockaded woodpecker
USFWS optimal survey window: year round; November -early March (optimal)

Jurisdictional and Protected Species FEB 2 1 2011
Imestintion Repoii
Vanceboro, North Carolina tMQr6'i�1d6-15�',Drig
Aus;uct '010
Habitat Description: The red -cockaded woodpecker (RCW) typically occupies open,
mature stands of southern pines, particularly longleaf pine (Pincus palustris), for
foraging and nesting/roosting habitat. The RCW excavates cavities for nesting
and roosting in living pine trees, aged 60 years or older, and which are contiguous
with pine stands at least 30 years of age to provide foraging habitat. The foraging
range of the RCW is normally no more than 0.5 miles.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect. Habitat in the form of pine or pine dominated stands
does not exist in the project boundaries. No impacts to RCW or its habitat will result
from project construction.
[USFWS] United States Fish and Wildlife Service. Red -cockaded Woodpecker in North
Carolina. hgp://www.fws.gov/nc-esibirds/rcwood.html. (Accessed 02/18/08)
West Indian manatee
USFWS optimal survey window: year round
Habitat Description: Manatees have been observed in all the North Carolina coastal
counties. Manatees are found in canals, sluggish rivers, estuarine habitats, salt
water bays, and as far off shore as 3.7 miles. They utilize freshwater and marine
habitats at shallow depths of 5 to 20 feet. In the winter, between October and
April, manatees concentrate in areas with warm water. During other times of the
year habitats appropriate for the manatee are those with sufficient water depth, an
adequate food supply, and in proximity to freshwater. Manatees require a source
of freshwater to drink. Manatees are primarily herbivorous, feeding on any
aquatic vegetation present, but they may occasionally feed on fish.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect. Aquatic resources in the project study area are not of
sufficient size to support the West Indian Manatee. No impacts to the West Indian
Manatee will result from this project.
[USFWS] United States Fish and Wildlife Service. West Indian Manatees in North
Carolina. hltp://www.fws.gov/nc-es/mammal/manatee.html. (Accessed 02/18/08)
American alligator
USFWS optimal survey window: year round (only warm days in winter)
Habitat Description: In North Carolina, alligators have been recorded in nearly every
coastal county, and many inland counties to the fall line. The alligator is found
rivers, streams, canals, lakes, swamps, and coastal marshes. Adult animals are
highly tolerant of salt water, but the young are apparently more sensitive, with
salinities greater than 5 parts per thousand considered harmful. The American
alligator remains on the protected species list due to its similarity in appearance to
the Endangered American crocodile.
Biological Conclusion: Species listed as threatened due to similarity of appearance do
not require Section 7 consultation with the USFWS.
[USFWS] United States Fish and Wildlife Service. American alligator (Alligator
mississippiensis)
http://www.fws.gov/species/species accounts/bio alli.html. (Accessed 02/15/08)

Junsdictional and Protected Species
Imestigation Rcport
Vanceboro, North Uaiolina
August ?(llu
RECEIM
Leatherback sea turtle
FEB 2 A 2011
USFWS optimal survey window: April - AugustN�P�aF�€klaG�i�(�
Habitat Description: Leatherbacks are distributed world-wide in tropical waters of the
Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian oceans. They are generally open ocean species, and
may be common off the North Carolina coast during certain times of the year.
However, in northern waters leatherbacks are reported to enter into bays,
estuaries, and other inland bodies of water. Major nesting areas occur mainly in
tropical regions. In the United States, primary nesting areas are in Florida,
however nests are known from Georgia, South Carolina, and North Carolina as
well. Nesting occurs from April to August. Leatherbacks need sandy beaches
backed with vegetation in the proximity of deep water and generally with rough
seas. Beaches with a relatively steep slope are usually preferred.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect. Open ocean, estuaries, and large coastal water bodies
are not present in the project study area. This project will have no effect on the
Leatherback sea turtle.
[NOAA] National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Fisheries, Office of
Protected Resources. Leatherback Turtle (Dermochelys coriacea).
http://www.mnfs.noaa.gov/pr/species/turtles/leatherback.htm. (Accessed on 02/18/08)
[USFWS] United States Fish and Wildlife Service. Leatherback Sea Turtles in North
Carolina. hiip://www.fws.gov/nc-es/reptile/leather.html. (Accessed 02/18/08)
Rough -leaf loosestrife
USFWS optimal survey window: mid May -June
Habitat Description: Rough -leaved loosestrife, endemic to the Coastal Plain and
Sandhills of North and South Carolina, generally occurs in the ecotones or edges
between longleaf pine uplands and pond pine pocosins in dense shrub and vine
growth on moist to seasonally saturated sands and on shallow organic soils
overlaying sand (spodosolic soils). Occurrences are found in such disturbed
habitats as roadside depressions, maintained power and utility line rights-of-way,
firebreaks, and trails. The species prefers full sunlight, is shade intolerant, and
requires areas of disturbance (e.g., clearing, mowing, periodic burning) where the
overstory is minimal. It can, however, persist vegetatively for many years in
overgrown, fire -suppressed areas. Blaney, Gilead, Johnston, Kalmia, Leon,
Mandarin, Murville, Torhunta, and Vaucluse are some of the soil series that
occurrences have been found on.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect. Habitat for Rough -leaf loosestrife does not exist in
the project study area. No impacts to Rough -leaf loosestrife will occur as a result
of project construction.

k ®LSV,
` FEB
Jurisdictional and Protected Species N �01i
Vanceboro, North ('arolina
:'august ?(lltt
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Rough-leaf Loosestrife (Lysimachia
asperidifolia). http://www.fws.gov/nc-es/plant/rllooses.html (Accessed: January 17,
2008).
Sensitive joint -vetch
USFWS optimal survey window: mid July -October
Habitat Description: Sensitive joint -vetch grows in the mildly brackish intertidal zone
where plants are flooded twice daily. This annual legume prefers the marsh edge
at an elevation near the upper limit of tidal fluctuation, but can also be found in
swamps and on river banks. Sensitive joint -vetch normally occurs in areas with
high plant diversity where annual species predominate, and can grow in sand,
mud, gravel, or peat substrates. Bare to sparsely vegetated substrates appear to be
a microhabitat feature of critical importance to this plant. Such microhabitats
may include accreting point bars that have not yet been colonized by perennial
species, areas scoured out by ice, low swales within marshes, muskrat "eat outs"
where this rodent removes all of the vegetation within a small portion of the
marsh, storm damaged areas, and the saturated organic sediments of some interior
marshes that have local nutrient deficiencies. In North Carolina, stable
populations have been found in the estuarine meander zone of tidal rivers where
sediments transported from upriver settle out and extensive marshes are formed.
Additional North Carolina occurrences are also found in moist to wet roadside
ditches and moist fields, but these are not considered stable populations.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect. No tidally influenced estuarine habitat exists in the
project study area. No impacts to Sensitive joint -vetch will occur as a result of
project construction.
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2006. Optimal Survey Windows for North
Carolina's Federally Threatened and Endangered Plant Species. http://www.fws.gov/nc-
es/es/plant survey.html (Accessed: February 18, 2008).
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Sensitive Joint -vetch (Virginia Joint -vetch) in
North Carolina. ht_pt ://www.fws.gov/nc-es/plant/sensiointv.html (Accessed: January 17,
2008).

FFP � 11 ?011
/N
4
41
E
to i
S
#6
43
IMill Pond Rd Site
4,
ap
4 J,
It 4
N, Farmlife Ave Site
+
Vanceb&o
I t"k 6 37
/V•
Streets Ferry Rd Site
4
63
V.
4#,
(
1440
4P 16- esti
7�
em
4,000
Feet
3,000,1_',
06, -,000 2.50 00
7
FIGURE I Wetland August
KAUSGS Quad Map Delineation 2010
1 11 11 Vanceboro, North Carolina
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Quadrangle. V2ncphorn. NC 4 — 4 Ann X-

FEB 2019

A
- � F . � - d � Vii. a /� r •� �-
- '. 3. .� 4 . ;. "J •' ,lam'..• `.����.�
IRR
U.
/
I� �� � .I. ��n ...• <Y� �/•f"� � . f-�/�""``�' rr- Pim-�x
Z114 Y
NO
Ilk
Legend
Delineation Flags
Delineated Wetland Line
Wetland Area
3;,. _ .� , �'� .Y � . ! - �lrr! •, .'%ter' S �tq�' �,,�', J '. •.
33 � Y+iry f y
.fie � -i�\\\.� .�� � 1`� �V'l!ii �' f l ��.. � r` ��(�•l .s..� ,`I
��\�\\h• f RSI / ��.
f
Boundaries
_ •
4

RECEive)
FEB 2 1 2011

Jurisdictional and Protected ecwe
Imestigatioil Rep
Vanceboro. North Caroli rL� 2011
August 1010
APPENDIX A
Federal and State
Jurisdictional Forms

FEB 2 1 ?Oil
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Guff Coastal Plain Region
�; Scu i w Gr6 c fC
ProjecVSite: S7r'rE/y¢ e�flr{ City/County: VAr C -10,O ^0 CVY"flleazJ Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: b" cv --+J7� V,9 �v-%,4 � /i}s ✓ ,5 State: AA �� Sampling Point: 4 /'�
Investigator(s):-P-¢eSff�� d94e/�Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):f=/ewrl /ire/ Local relief (concave, convex, none): 6!rA &A%,e- Slope (%}:
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: J 50- T 1� & d Long: 7 7• I-4 7 3 6 & Datum:
Soil Ma Unit Name: iY1/iSe�sl Gct��1 rKr 11/ �'�^-��lec !��- AFO&F. j jCL1/ 1(
Map � ��,tiF Snta/c�b 1`oQ�, NWl c si kation;
. vP ,.
Are climatic! hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes V11No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? A14 Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes to No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? AI%0 (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes V-1- No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes V. No within a Wetland? Yes tZ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks: f=/mol �pfirr� o -�- S - c LC
�Ir-/cc�r �'PI.v-P�lgartcct�../ ��/�r-�''•r� a�t1�5�G-�^-S•
(kce_7-*>-/,O W* Saes,. y Jdo lady s tr A�e,fs'?1-e s si�%° pdr ce v
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check,all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1)
-,/-Water-Stained Leaves (69)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
_/High Water Table (A2)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
rtm Drainage Patterns (B10)
c/
/,Saturation (A3)
_ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Waler Marks (B1)_
�lydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
-Sediment Deposits (B2)
_4/ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
,Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Solis (C6)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (03)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): T, D
Saturation Present? Yes rj No
Depth (inches): s -t FAee
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks: 6�
0j, -'`/'Fsu d It.) J4 lel!
!tom 5 S�rB�+51rj �rC9�x1f
du a
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version

-"I CY
-fi=t
A. t
hoz?
Vic, or.,
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
FEB 201?
Sampling Point:'ac�t
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version
0
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:ed )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
I.
7Axo�ara.- G1r4'24i-'­e. ,
r/. 0bIL
That Are OBL,FACKorFAC: a (A)
3.
L,v r s < ru.(Os ✓;
t� n,.
�!��
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species a
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: AO l (A/B)
4. �e9v�tr�R-b_.164-r
-�-
5. Ne/ -5/1 C-au.c�f,�r O6�
P�y -
6. f //r ,EA9�et e7CCaG edt.; 6/" /1 r/reaj -
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
= Total Cover
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
08L species x f =
1.
Ar-ey- Pu, b rAu
s% �/; G
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
2. CA r•u.ii r-.4 r✓ F44
-F
3. Z r�,� i c�/Y-w� � lir sAy"/`c",-FACot_ C +
4,
5.
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
7.
= Tata! Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
/
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
V Dominance Test is >50%
1.
SE�� tl,�D� srtlr3,� err rzw
r-Itr- -t
_ Prevalence Index is53.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
3.
4,
5.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic -
6.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7 -
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
= Total Cover
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1.
QA.,eeleea_ 54.A,-Sti✓,,l/5r
✓ F Ce)
Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
2. .� k 11-ra e m-5 [_ GJ'A)1.1,u- 5 t/ O 6,L
3. Pali) ffd-e-y'rA-- C,,r, J ,-f-a- 0 l L_
4.-f e. .1k -pe '-, s r § - r4E6j
5. 6CL PA, eea A- GVi,.v d r r, G PAC(A)-
6. E% k5 mA-p-, r,. /A -r, rc') h nye rfe -
7-
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
8.
3 ft (1 m) in height.
9.
10,
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
% d �, � m c4 ®..l c� rG.rl ,^ .+��r c ✓t-,�1 s
v� ��!L
3.
211f�iS/ c��5¢tt►Blt5
FA 6-
Hydrophytic
Vegetation /
04. cl�fZu.Gcttl t�r.sru-� sciar✓4c� a �-a lr%t- � L
5
= Total Cover
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If{ observed, lisjt morphological adaptations below).
Tl e..V %�� trf c� C 2�5
GP t T`tX�!{ O es.. U✓e Jrl$ ri t S 4 f �F r d av Lv w- wNN! t'•
Q o
5fer� i �ct,tlr�5
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version
0

SOIL
r
Samnlino P PFWI,L:t_ :l.n:
2011
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % TypeLoc-
Texture Remarks
o
e,,__ P�
Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_„ 1 cm Muck (Ag) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
oamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
— Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P. S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
ems' Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Sails (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
— Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1531B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
— Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2) (LRR T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
^_
— Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_ Depleted Ochric (1711) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetiand hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
upped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 163C, 153D)
a Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P. S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
/
(
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks: pdd Fr t? �. /��
50i-t5 d,c C4-f!/Z.S
4A ,X&, as L,
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Interim Version
;W

^�5 Print Form
FEB2y 101
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
n r B .sw: iP� ""Worrjh0a4'p7-'
,
ProjecUVfSite: ,e f" F_ -rr g , o tiAJQ c -F cr�z-rC City/County: _ 11Awc @ b Ee-
rh*VA-1 Sampling Date:,7 � / 0/0
Applicant/Owner: Acd N.,11rJ.�- /�J�(r� State: 4,16, Sampling Point: CJ Is-
Investigator(s): hr, �f--5:f-Arr ! 4/ d� hl -t) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): P,a-e�f�s //k/;i Local reliefconcave, convex, none): Slope (%): c2 Z/
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: j 5-' X 14? '� �% Long: 7, le -1 � i 66 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: PA&$0AJ tDW Al M CLL &"et.le 2 NWI classification:
Are climatic ! hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ❑ No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? A -JO Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ED -No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? VO (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
r
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No ©� Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ r=+
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
a Wetland? Yes No No ®f
Remarks:A) e- ov J-- anZite9� %d aot cos � �./� -tet-oaf �' 1,"Ja 0/,i-i=t1 d 5cv ir• i� JC . .
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum or two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (A1)
_❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
Q High Water Table (A2)
Aquatic Fauna (813)
❑—t Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
TT❑II
L 1 Marl Deposits (B15) (L,RR U)
t_! Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (Bi)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
D Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living
Roots (C3) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mal or Crust (134)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (85)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
n Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
❑
Surface Water Present? Yes Noepth
(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ Noepth
(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes ElNolepth
(inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No 51
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
;7, J-
4_J Irc ¢ ,v 7" To
(sec yo i .
W e IF�Jc-NrJ i cd f d �D c� y.0 o� + G,t S �f i`L G2 S G iJ
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version

VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) °/ Cover Species? Status
1NllS AIL a. ✓ ❑ P/ -C
1, ft
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: � (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species o/
That Are OBL, FACor or FAC: 0 /o (AIB)
(�
2.�.�. c m-�iF-v.._ �t-y� �u ✓-JAG r i lit e� e� ❑�'i
3• ❑
4. ❑
5 ❑
6. ❑
7.
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
1,
❑
= Total Cover
❑
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x4=
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
2, ❑
3, ❑
4• ❑
5, ❑
6. ❑
7 ❑
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1 1q ,:P—r /'w& r.:::
=Total Cover
t% ❑ F'le-
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
V" Dominance Test is >50%
_ Prevalence Index is:53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 f -G IL ❑ AC,
/
4 ❑
5. ❑
6.
❑
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 N (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 it (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 it (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
7. ❑
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) /
2- ❑
3 ❑
4• ❑
5. ❑
6. ❑
7. ❑
8'
g.
10. ❑
11. ❑
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. l Ox r i d �i�✓�d�z✓ �r:�r c �t�/5
❑
= Total Cover
/
Y ❑ rlV—
Vegetation �
Present? Yes LJ No ❑
2. �` o.v� eco- no r✓1� w' ❑ FiFC-
3. ❑
4. ❑
5 E]Hydrophytic
= Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
11 /
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Interim Version

SOIL.
,ftnya"
FEB 2 1 2011
Sampling Paint:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) 11'' ,a
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (maist) %
Color (moist) % Type, Loci
Texture Remarks
/,P r
/2
'Type: C=Concentration. D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
H dric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
-O
II 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Q Histic Epiped(A2)
t❑�Polyvalue
Thin
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T. U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Q Black Histic (A3)
FLoamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
f -1 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_oDepleted Matrix (F3)
fl Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
-LJRedox Dark Surface (F6)
_uDepleted Dark Surface (F7)
(MLRA 15313)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (AB) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (178)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
L{�J 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
[]Mari (1`10) (LRR U)
uDepleted
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
L_L Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Q Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Fj Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) Umbric Surface (1`13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
a Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Q Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
-❑Reduced Verlic (F1 B) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
^ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
LL Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
�
ElNo ❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
„ .. soils dp .got ex�z`lar A) Ar
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version
C&I

USACE AID#
DWQ#
PECEIVED
A
FFR 2 Y ?011
Site # (indicate on attached map)
;,s„ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT ` ORKSITEET
Provide the foIIowing information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: EIC r-ax,t 2. Evaluator's name:
3. Date of evaluation:_ Z / /t7 4. Time of evaluation: 1 --'da B
5. Name of stream:__ -',' 12 ,, Pt GfP�L' �+' 6. River
7. Approximate drainage area. /.7 af. e .les 8. Stream order: 3 4
9. Length of reach evaluated: 150 ft . 10. County: rii-ve.wJ
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 3 5. rt "i 1P eo 17 Longitude (ex. -77.556611): 'i'7 . / -/ 9 3 (a
Method location determined (circle): GPS She ( ho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other AI&JL
13. Location ofreach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying streams) location):
_U,A-d e---6 9 A), C . .tJG n6lx 1 T a..0 d s r�r e-5 Rd.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): NO LU e
15. Recent weather conditions: w 5 /,,? 61.4 a)13 5/ ; ,UcGe o 0.5.
16. Site conditions at time of visit:yf-fro.yq P/acc,, A6-ce Ami`' qo� •� d,;
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section IO _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters -4 Nutrient Sensitive Waters `Water Supply Watershed (I-rV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? S)NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: ? t o - % ✓r[
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? 0) NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? ES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: Ll�% Residential r/ I % Commercial ✓ _% Industrial 57 % Agricultural 0`'
a 5% Forested r/ _% Cleared/ Logged _%Other (_
22. Bankf-ull width: -3 0 -qD Fes.
23_ Bank height (from bed to top of bank): A - y ick .
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -ZFlat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight V/Occasional bends Frequent meander
-Moderate (4 to 100/.) _Steep (>10%)
_Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of I00 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total N�c'
Score (from reverse): i tr' Comments: ,9 & 57C ,9&5111414)
Z,11-
Evaluator's Signature J/ 4,q Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-376-8441 x 26.
5l9

�"ECEIVED
FFR 2 l ?011
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORK -SHEET
t These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
� J
i a Iy �� { i i' r
�''b � 1 e"tiL
��75 r��i�tG �SS?l..H
,ii}1
��4163_ ;?:
:�1yi �;'."r
yrt
5 1
14 Y1
i. >•K
7j„'rT
i ti rL
r• '�a {9��.4�$?t.F„1j JG�3.3 t �J C+r%Ft` �S � r
k i X� \fy4•S� t 1t t N G V('r
k r �Qii�t'6 V ✓{ji.�:.y Y 5 ♦ fi.5
1 rr eiN
?rPr
� !'v �'•. �•'.-'!:3
�I
r
'resence of flow I erscsteut Dols to stream
P
0 — 5
no flow or saturation 0; strop flow = mitx mis
s
�
`i' � Evidence of past laumuu alterntton
-
• ;:.
(extensive alterairon = 0; no alteration = max points
_ry
,.
F-
.- .'..� : ''-'.. 13t1iarlsilt•ZOnQ. '.' t, ;; - + - ,'.a1t:r '1 r .
••,.'J a
&
J� _ i -
0 — 4
_� -
0 S
no buffer 0; coni ffe
bus, wide bur max ants).
p
y
rt¢EEndeact'`ofnutrienrot
etigarrbead'disclinr
�F e
�- � extensivadascli es Ono`diSc es mom•,
i
�'±at�y�;.r
0 .4
_ ��,
tats)
_:_ :
,.; + troundter dlscIiarge
disch ' 6, 0; ,,etc arax ratseaceofndjacQattiioodplaiia;`
0' 4
s rw s, se swetlan
';;.:._-�..,
no flood lain = 0 exterisivc flood ' 11 =max intimtreuchlnerit:ifipodpain.aece,:_h
de entiencheil= 0 fre uent iioaclin maxPreseticeofadJacentovetlandi
L-5
::'
incl W --ands =• (1 dad"acerit,wetiarid§ =max
0--4
-lar
Channel sinuosity
extensive:channelizntion = 0• natural meander= max h t)
_
0 _ 3
3
Sediment inAD.put... ,:. _
J.
y
extens'tve`'de osition= O; little or no sediment`='max otats
Size �3 diversityof channel bed substrate:'-
`l
fine; homogenous = 0 large, diverse sizes =max uits
A11
=r;
Evidence of channel incision or widening
dee,1 incised = O'stablti bed & ba.i s:=max rota
l?iesence of major bank failures
.'
—�
13
severe erosion = 0• no erosion stable banks = maxpoints)0
_
0 5
.5
1
14
. Root depth and density on baanks.:::. , ; ,, . ; : -.. .:
0= 3
, 4 .:.: •.
fl ,
; . , a ' S
—
3
no visible roots =.0• dense roots thibu out mirk, birits
.
'r
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber prod aiction'
-
:.T-4'
iS
stibstanlialim :ie � no evidence=riaax 'iirts
1.:-3'
0-5
Presence of riffle-paoUripple-pool complexes'16
.no
.riffles/ri les or pools = 0• well-develo d = max points)
.�
Habitat complexity
` •
1?
little or no habitat = 0; f -e uen varied habitats = maxpoints)U
-6';
0-6
0 — 6 .
5
a ..;
Canopy coverage over strearnbed
18
no shadingvegetation = 0; continuous canopy= max points)'y
0=5
0-5
19
Substrate embeddedness •
:
fl -4
de l embedded = 0; loose structure = mau
0 —
Presersce of strearrr invertebrates (ace page 4) ' '
4 ~ ;'
20
no evidence = 0; common, numerous = max Dints)
p
5 -
0-5
c R
�?
21
:Presence of amphibians -.
(no evidence = 4; common, numerous types = max rots
{0_-4
'-. p_.i.
0-4. .
a,
�3
22
Presence of fish
0.-4
0-4
0-4
—
..
no evidence = 0; common numerous s = max rots)
23,
Evidence of wildlife use
0-5. "
0-5
-
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
0-5Al
- � � •.�� t9 �pussibl 3.1. •�u I%I.���t')pn
li] �'.
,i:
'�
:`j}. A _(y�/�
•i'
d J •i j �-ri•� .�.-�.
t � '.S -:i;: '?�.a r .�. .�:"�.$}"= :_,_ES
•. .� jl->' }.:. C.. ^?{- ;fey-,:V^••ti1c�.-
L.�11'Q�•Yh�'"
..:'�'..�;1•4t..
t%�0� t.
...�1. J
f1:,i•';l,N{�
•' J R-r(t M1ft
_
_ Yid r.,.. .'L.i _ -•Fwy_
..'SCJ 't4: �.`ta �.1.r. :'J•' t^i
'v4.., L
=Y . .:1..'. K. ski.". r: •'Crr a:.r...�-i .. i,�
tom{ }� (7 .,�
�.{�. .x�-"'_F.••.r.-:�<•'.Ir:,:'rr- '`�, ���i�.`IHfSC9: � tiDilr�' a s.�,... .fir•.-:x=� -
""`�Y: bg� •�,Ct,._x. ,T... - :5:...
17
t These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality- Stream identification Form; Version 3.1
"ECEIVED
FFR ?nt1
f140M1h0Gd�I�U
Date: r%l ?lg pip Project:
Evaluator: pefs
Site:
S. .4 u„ F2�• Comk Longitude: -- % r7 . le -1 T3
Total Points:t>,g-1VCe_1JC,.d.a Other lora,
Stream Is at least intermittent 3ry County: �d %u
it'a 19 or rennial if z 30 e.9. Quad Name:
A- Geamnrnhnlnnv tCiihintni _ t
a
i. Continuous bed and bank
- - -
0
--•
1
nu4art q�tl
.7Ir_ Ong
2. Sinuosity
0
1
2
2
3
3. In -channel structure: riffle -pool sequence
0
1t
2
3
4. Sall texture or stream substrate sorting
0
i
0.5
3
5. Active/ratio floodplain
0
1
2
2
3
8. Depositional bars or benches
0
1'
2
3
7. Braided channel
0
1
-i-
3
S. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
0.5
3
9 a Natural levees
0
1
2
3
10. Headcuts .
0
1
2
3
11: Grade controls
0
3
12. Natural valley and drainageway
0
0.5
1
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
1.5J
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
No 0
Yes = 3
evidence.
`Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdrnlnnv ICuhfnfnl _,
14. Groundwater flow/dischargeMoraM
- -
r
15. Water In channel and > 48 hrs since rai
3
- d or rowin seas:_l16.
3
2
��Waterinchannel
Leaflitter
3
2
1
i7. Sedimant on tants
0
0.5
1
18.0 anic debris lines or piles (Wrack line1.5
0
1
2
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphIc features) present?
NO
0.5
1
C
0
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
Other = 0
Notes: (use back side of this form for addftlonal notes.) Sketch: L st. AUc y 3
ws f ?-
f�icre.u•✓r�-,/
%err �cC 5 �'p��r...-� y�-e�'1.�.,fCt CSW 4•�-�J h07`7�e.�rJx.U' j 'LCXr /rC{ d/flr
fp w�Fr
�j
j ,f FV
n 1 w�U4_V
F
v
ti
- -
r
C. Biology Subtotal
20 . Fibrous roots In channel
3
2
1
21 . Rooted plants in channel
3
2
1
22. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
23. Bivalves
0
1
2
24. Fish
0
0.5
1
25. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
26. Macrobenthos (nota diversity and abundance)
0
0.5
1
27. Ramentous algae; periphyton
0'
0.5
1
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus.
0.5
1
29 . Weiland plants In streambed
FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
SAV
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, item
29 focuses on the
presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
C
0
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
Other = 0
Notes: (use back side of this form for addftlonal notes.) Sketch: L st. AUc y 3
ws f ?-
f�icre.u•✓r�-,/
%err �cC 5 �'p��r...-� y�-e�'1.�.,fCt CSW 4•�-�J h07`7�e.�rJx.U' j 'LCXr /rC{ d/flr
fp w�Fr
�j
j ,f FV
n 1 w�U4_V
F
v
ti

•r
` 1ECEIVEP
FEB
1 2011
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # {indicate on attached
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSNI NT WORK nEE'T
r/3l--v,- Lr -F,. rGc-1 _ tJ 4-"
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: A4P
1. Applicant's name:_2. Evaluator's name: Pe r- .5fi_J, 1± IAI-11vr
3. Date of evaluation:4. Time of evaluation: d :00 P.
5. Name of stream; 6t rfi DP4htde, Sw ±Iq 6. River basin: AVB as e
7. Approximate drainage area: X411) Beres 8. Stream order: cZ-
9. Length of reach evaluated: 0 P& 10. County: e- ,-, "
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any); lUoalC
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): .3 S . 3 C) Q 5 r Longitude (ex. -77.556611): - 7
Method location determined (circle): GPS T She rtho Aerial PhotolG Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
MCC &Q,:fit? ..y.C. !FA>"m+ lr�'� a�ece a� �r1wdYla of GQeazle sy%
14. Proposed channel work (if any): ,r
%0 iwe /1
15. Recent weather conditions: !�se .i � �¢ S t_oi/i/fl�� !� v.$ �3 ri Si.i![f.� ((�y�) K�Rc /R' 0. SrNG4aa l i^..rrll i 1 <i Fe ..,.c .-l-1
16. Site conditions at time of vi
w
*t- F' a.r ; t
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 -Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
,Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watersbed (I_M
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? GNO If yes, estimate the water surface area: G 4C
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? (0)w 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
341
21. Estimated watershed land use: /0 Residential f 1110 % Commercial �% Industrial S3 % Agricultural
7 % Forested �% Cleared / Logged _% Other (
22. Bankfull width: bt - IV "P 7`- 233. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 3 - to P-4-
24.
424. Channel slope down center of stream; _Flat (0 to 2%) ✓ Gende (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander _ _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate eacb
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and I00, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):_ �J rlComments:-Ac Ar e ,v sV tI'r
Evaluator's Signature ✓p�-e 12 Date 01:1f/�r�ae9/0
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-844I x 26.

1' ECVVEV
FEB 2 1 2011
MurehoGdO4'i 000
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
f
'1SP.h '�.Er�L''6F + Opp om- Y"�,
J "tY �C`Y•,Ri��nJ fy'i'
C�.�
S. -1r
y s rrraT r
l. ��7} �' . 2 `Y +� { �7 V,i+YYuls•
~ 'j�r.�1` k 1 :moi
T]fse Fsi1
1
1f�+Jy,
;*�''+txa�r
'+v_- "Lvi.
I7L•' i'.d''�,-\
f Nk i� J
„art
_. Q�
!i
U
R .f '1'3` - t'
t
Presence of flow! persistent pools in stream
:.
0 5
4
0;5
ration = 0; stron fl =max
no iiow. or saturation
r
` `videncc
of ase human alterattosa s
,
a;
?J
extensive aIieratio��nyy = 0; no aiieration =max tats ' '
3
XilpHrt�lirt. zoIIe .Y JXI: i.2yy/
_ `
a 6
G '. `•.I.
0-4
o`=s
}
no.buffer- 0; Conti us, wide buffer= max '-mts)
$ i rr„,l
4
? i+• t 4 f , .. X-.'.� 1
e
l'viilcai a ofuntrientor chitiica7 �tsc s3rges
t�. 4- t�� 4 +.
-L -
Y
` extensive: disch r'sr= 0 iso`dssch. ' es. tua nits ,�
y
t5> _ •,c�C t.;
4 ;"'
p
i
' i
}i rl'..'j4.`i 4 J {S.rQnIIdSvHteY d13Charge
1
5 +
ir; :7
•s,
0 4
(no disch a .O;:s nn sc s wetland ..etc. - max inti
r�, ,
i resenca of adjacent Daodplatn ' S , I,
no flood lata 0 extensivi~ flbod Isui =max rats
4 t :.
0 'Z
f,..
7
(lgodplam access ; �� ` 4,.•a,
=
l
rt < tistrenchmerit.! t
°
S
Q 4
0 2
s
(deeply entrenched = 0• gent tloodin max omts)�.
= ..Presence of Adjacent we, nda
3
$
002 etIAn&,: O aw 6 ad acent.weLlE9l�d9 TI1dY !ni'Y
. �' U I.r..'
-
r O
9
Channel sinuosity
-i:
�.
extensive ebiumelization = 0; natural meander — max fats)
x
Sediment input..
extensive de inion= 0; little or no sediment — max. osnts
0 3
0 —4
a
:.. Size & diversity of channel bed substrate,r
rL `J�
0 4
0-5
(fine, homogenous = 0 large, diverse sizes = max inti).'.
vee r„ .
—
A114
7
I✓vic3ence of channel incision or widening
s
l
dee l ihcisied = 0= stable bed & banks =

RECEV)
A. Gaarnaroholnew 1Ri ihtntal -. i 1. sq BF. -o
,a. Continuous bed and bank
--- -
0
---
1
EB 2 J'2017
North Carolina Division of Water Quality-
Stream Identification Form;
Version 3.1
i
1
2
2
3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
0
Date: fy/ice/ata/rr7
Project:
Latitude: 3 vim,
3 a D 7
0
Evaluator: ,�.
Site: .rte Jl
Longitude: -
7 '7
0
Total Points:
2
3
7. Braided channel
0
Stream is at least intermittent
County: C /
Other
VAIAJ c e o ro�
0`
N2 19 or renMal i(z 30
2
e.g. Quad Name:
N . G .
0
A. Gaarnaroholnew 1Ri ihtntal -. i 1. sq BF. -o
,a. Continuous bed and bank
--- -
0
---
1
11"JUWAU e:
2
aurvng.
2. Sinuosity
3. in -channel structure: riffle -pool sequence
0
0
i
1
2
2
3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
0
i
2
3
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
8. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Braided channel
0
1
2
3
8. Recent alluvfal deposits
0`
1
2
3
91 Natural levees
0
1
2
3
3
10. Headcuts .
0
1
2
3
11. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
12. Natural valley and drainageway
0
0.5
1
Sketch:
�
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
.S`
1.5
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
No ; 0
e�l e -c
Yes
evidence.
%o
= 3
wld '--q F
'Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvelroloov 1R,,htntnt - 5'. -,7 t
14. Groundwater flow/discharge
0
1
C. Biology Subtotal = 7,'7 5
15. Water In channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
20 . Fibrous roots In channel
2
3
Water in channel -- d or rowin season
0
1
01
3
16. Leaflitter
1.5
1
0.5�
23. Bivalves
17. Sediment on plants
0
0.5
1
0
1 5
18.Organic debris lines or Iles (Wrack lines)
0
0.5
1
0.5 1
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present?
Nn n
I
t
1.5
C. Biology Subtotal = 7,'7 5
20 . Fibrous roots In channel
3
2' 1
2i .Rooted plants in channel
3
2 0
0
22. Crayfish
0
0.5 1
0
23. Bivalves
0
1 2
3
24. Fish
0
0.5 1
1.
25. Amphibians
0
0.5 1
1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
0.5 1
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton
0
0.5 1
1.5
28. Iron oxidizing bacteriaffungus.
0
0.5 i
1.5
29 .Wetland plants in streambed
1 5
FAC = 0.5; ACW = 0.75; OBL =1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants,
Item 29 focuses on the presenc
uanc or wedand plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
pc re.V,v1�F 04,.�.�.-
Sketch:
�
.S`
A I
�� 1ri17xu1 eLt ,JAJe.I. Lit h-�,Od/
�j �a%t�
e�l e -c
IJu�t i
%o
zoL�t=�r 3-0-14%6,u�4�
wld '--q F
J5
` s�A
�✓Lodr.,� e�cl��v-r SerWr�� 5 ee/, S e
�v
psL©'/are1.
r

Print Form FK ss
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
ProjecUSite: rM,11 ar D n/� 01 � , City/County: U14-AJcelo®-rro3 G,r-/ l/e-,'L/Sampling Date: W13
Applicant/Owner. NSlate: IV.r-. Sampling Point: WA
Investigator(s): P4' h'--- S A/,4./ tCS lira% Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): _F1.0eL4A 141A/y S Local relief (concave, convex, none): C -isv e /,rttL Slope (%): O
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: 3 3 (p �� Long: %rf. / y3 / %~� Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: _ H414 -5a -,o ter G NWI classification:
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ❑ No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) /
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? A10 Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ❑l No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? �C? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Yes �❑
..%I c
❑
❑
of one is required; check all that apply)
Is the Sampled Area
Q,Surface Water (Al)
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No
❑
F]
-1 Aquatic Fauna (813)
within a Wetland?
❑,-- El
Yes No
Hydrology Present?
Yes No
ri/ater Marks (B1)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
i
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Remarks:
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
..1 � �;`AGy,� vsr/r-
c, rcw `;
50,Jde�2z�/h�.ayy,✓
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
QS G
_u Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Cbt151STGC// /¢1�[r�
r%IS ,f4 2 ro
�e
C��5Sro /2rJ
Ju.frBt�rC�<BltJ/'�C�GT%�tf1C�
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
PrimatV Indicators (minimum
of one is required; check all that apply)
0 Surface Soil Cracks (86)
Q,Surface Water (Al)
Q)Naler-Stained Leaves (B9)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB)
Eigh Water Table (A2)
-1 Aquatic Fauna (813)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
T❑
t- t Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
ri/ater Marks (B1)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
i
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Q Drift Deposits (B3)
® Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
0 Jr6n Deposits (B5)
_u Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
r❑—�
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) LJ Other (Explain in Remarks)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
.Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Yes © ie ❑ Depth (inches): .5-, J Et
Water Table Present?
Yes ®o ElDepth (inches): T,�4-r_,o
Saturation Present?
Yes LJ No El Depth (inches): P
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes ® No ❑
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Po f P-0
/o CA- hoA),
g u AJ cif
A)
!
-h" ,j V,S r b (t o aJ r� e- I- G A-f L� �✓��
_
g
�euy re �211�1/_.xced5 e 4- d�' �U res rz`fc�.tlf ute�rler�Jac-
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version
iW4

VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants.
FEB � 1 2011
Sampling PoA
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1. / 1q'XO0r ct c cl,. L „-
% Cover SS ecies? Status
V D 061-
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant AA
2. ❑
3. ❑
Species Across All Strata: f9 (B)
4.
❑
5
❑
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: {AIB)
6.
❑
7.
F1
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
= Total Cover
Sapling Stratum {Plat size: }
OBL species x 1 =
1.
❑
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
2, ❑
3• ❑
4• ❑
5. ❑
6. ❑
❑
7
Hydr phytic Vegetation Indicators:
= Total Cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
_ Dominance Test is >50%
1.
$�t-.'Jul d/'W'k 1a_5 a cc t 6
d 6 J.
— Prevalence Index is :53.0'
2,
yy=o 7�P�i/q ���t �esr;
❑ ��iG
l
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
3. ❑
4 ❑
❑
5
6,
❑
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
7. ❑
= Total Cover
approximately 20 it (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: }
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (OBH).
--J r'r p eA1 51 5
✓ ❑ 'ph "W
- Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
/Sapling
2. �o�<c a rr,_� /r.r�d / rc 4 �/ ❑ FI: _
3.
r`t� 0A-A�} la 4- �y 1 �i—
❑ D fa L
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 it (1 to 6 m) in height.
4.
5. 7 W at -'(^,; s p, ❑
6.
❑
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
❑
7.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
ft (1 m) in height.
6 ❑
[j3
9.
Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
10- ❑
11. ❑
12. ❑
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
❑
2. ❑
3_ ❑
4.
❑
5
F1
Vegetation
Vegetation X ❑
0
= Total Cover
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
a�ft�592.t� tFu ci
jr cfr,getl arrr r✓ e�� � .
4-'V Ce
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version

,t,
j tCEP V)
FEB 2 � 2011 .
SOIL
Sampling PdAi'PA��f (( -w
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) °l Type' LocZ
Texture Remarks
Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains_ 'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
H dric Soil Indicators:
Histosoi
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
OPolyvalue Below
(Al)
Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_OThin
l] 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Q Histic Epipedon (A2)
Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T. U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Q Black Histie(A3)
Floamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
�Depleled Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (176)
ilDepleted Dark Surface
(MLRA 153B)
j
(F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (AB) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
a pepieted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)Iron-Manganese
�����1111ii����''''iittttDepleted Ochric (Fi i) (MLRA 151)
Masses 'Indicators
(1712) (LRR O, P,
T) of hydrophytic vegetation and
0 Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
rl Sandy Mucky Mineral (51) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
—DReduced
unless disturbed or problematic.
Q Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
RSandy Redox (S5)
Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
]Piedmont Floodplain Solis (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Q Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
�y
Hydric Soil Present? Yes M No
!jot l5 wee4-%,n Gr//-WIAwrcfL�rtlLfo.c//t f. ��A%1
t!
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Interim Version

Print Form
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region "J"J"ead(" ,,,
IDaw
ProiecUSite: ✓r r b/y� —_ ACL. City/County: Uh- rbc ted 6a�t/rItt-- Sampling Date: i" f75 11116,1 o
ApplicantiOwner:1�s��✓c State: !t/i G • Sampling Point: G
Investigator(s).- P1.1-8— 1 Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): ��t-/�'J, �w Local relief (concave, convex, none): 61st-✓ e Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: :5 D (0 Long: " 77. Iq 3 1 Datum:
F
Soil Map Unit Name: .0^4./1- b -A ,C t'f-_ e e ,
NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No El(If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Aro Are "Normal Circumstances" present?
❑ ❑ ❑
Yes © No ❑
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? ,WC; (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ©�� Is the Sampled Area
El.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No F,
❑ No
within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes L�]
Remarks: Al C IJQ! 06 uJ
Amo- -ldeAAO-r- ee I` r! 1°' 4&_b, d oyr,/t- vP �' we
sa / f S a. vv d1 2�c:y m /0 �j � �•cJ � c G fr X02 5 cz rt cl. � 5 E •� �-
NYUKULUUY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
0 Surface Soil Cracks (136)
[3Surface Water (A1)
_❑ Water -Stained Leaves (69)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB)
D High Water Table (A2)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
El Drainage Patterns (BID)
El Saturation (A3)
�❑-I
L-1 Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Crayfish Burrows (CB)
Q Drift Deposits (63)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (84)
�] Iron Deposits (85)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No
❑ Depth (inches): VeAJe
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No
❑ Depth (inches): --16A18
Saturation
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No
❑ Depth (inches): 0.10 lP_
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes ❑ No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
5 fie)ep_ f 7�le c
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version

VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants.
;ACEI ED
�EB � 12011
Sampling Pointmorohoed?��� EN
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:/ ) % Cover Species? Status
1. pi, w S -7,4-ae-de, FA G
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: y (A)
2. 6�
a
3. Lf f �.-A � F�� f A
❑ FAv-,4
El���
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: tP (B)
Percent of Dominant Species ��
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4_1L_ (AIB)
El
4. ❑
5
6.
7
❑
❑
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply bV:
= Total Cover
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
OBL species x 1 =
1,
❑
FACW species x2=
2.
❑
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x4=
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence index = BIA =
3_ ❑
4_ ❑
5. ❑
7
Shrub Stratum (Plot sizer )
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
/
✓ Dominance Test is >50%
✓
1. 4 r C 13't-rw-. 1:0'&1V f d!
I/ Q 17—A C,
_ Prevalence Index €s s3.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic,
2 —� ❑
3. ❑
4 ❑
5. ❑
6.
7-
❑
❑
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
= Total Cover
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (OBH).
e ry`w(n ru :r. _
❑ F*A-4-
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 it (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 it (1 m) In height.
Woody vine —All woody vines, regardless of height.
2. �� e.c 9 Yc� w+- Si.r�ervs AC
4
3. r,+ I-V f/ ❑
4• ❑
5. ❑
6.
7. ❑
8 ❑
g ❑
10 ❑
11. ❑
12. ❑
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1. /�wo x00 �tt�tr�k/ l Ayv / �1Tr t%fi
s� u
2.
3.
❑
❑
4.
5
❑
El
Cover
Vegetation Vegetation El
Present? Yes EQ No
Remarks:l (if observed, list morphological adaptations below) -
elow).tic��'r'iFTrO.J 01 -e -e'i'3
tic
4 btA1t-/ .si Y"i1Y,UP �J �. U,�-ci��p2d (eY c94.
�l
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Interim Version

SOIL
1% cncmp)
Al.
FEB t 12011
Sampling Paint.
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type, Loc` Texture R
/49P r XV S -e a Loz kx s�v��
we 00 (
`Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. Location: PL=Pore Linin M=Matrix.
H dric Soil indicators:
Histasol
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
(At)
-tOPclyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
f] 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Qu
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_E] 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
I--1
L -t Black Histic (A3)
_01-oamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
MLoamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_oDepleted
Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
- Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 Mucky Mineral P, T, U)
❑❑Redox Dark Surface (176)
_Depleted Dark Surface
(MLRA 1538)
_ cm (A7) (LRR
(F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
BMuck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
J]Redox Depressions (F8)
FJ
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
_1 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
f -_L
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
0
Other (Explain in Remarks)
I_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
[� Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
[� Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
El Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
:]Reduced
unless disturbed or problematic.
[] Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Verlic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
Sandy Redox (S5)�--{Piedmont
Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A,
153C, 153D)
El Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S. T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
50i✓5 CQo ,v14 71- ," Pe
Hydric Soil Present? Yes El No
NGJ9O -1— X&j
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version

A.
Jurisdictional and Protectelecies���F����
InNestigation epoit
Vanccboru, North Caro]
FEB 2 1 2011
August 20116
morGh%d ��RR
References
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
Wetlands and Deepwater Habitat of the United States. Fish and Wildlife Service,
U.S. Department of the Interior.
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation
Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1. United States Army Engineer Waterways
Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS. 100
pp. + appendices.
Martof, B.S., W.M. Palmer, J.R. Bailey, and J.R. Harrison III. 1980. Amphibians
and Reptiles of the Carolinas and Virginia. The University of North Carolina
Press, Chapel Hill, NC. 264 pp.
Potter, Eloise F., James F. Parnell, and Robert P. Teulings. 1980. Birds of the
Carolinas. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC. 408 pp.
Radford, A.E., H.E. Ahles, and C.R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the Vascular Flora of
the Carolinas. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC. 1183
PP.
Reed, P.B., Jr. 1988. National list of plant species that occur in wetlands: national
summary. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 88(24). 244pp.
Rohde, F.C., R.G. Arndt, D.G. Lindquist, and J.F. Parnell. 1994. Freshwater
Fishes of the Carolinas, Virginia, Maryland, and Delaware. The University of
North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC.
Sibley, David Allen. 2001. The Sibley Guide to Birds. National Audubon
Society.
USDA site http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2010. Craven County, North
Carolina. Endangered Species, Threatened Species and Federal Species of
Concern. United States Department of Interior.
Weakley, Alan, S. Working Draft 2005. Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and
Georgia. The University of North Carolina Herbarium, North Carolina Botanical
Garden, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Webster, W.D., Parnell, J. F., and W. C. Biggs. 1985. Mammals of the Carolinas,
Virginia, and Maryland. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill,
NC. 255 pp.