34081_WASLEY, CRYSTAL_20030627

--. ,11CAMA / F DREDGE & FILL �� J
GENERAL PERMIT Previous permit#
❑New LModification ❑Complete Reissue CPartial Reissue Date previous permit issued
As authorized by the State of North Carolina, Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant to 15A NCAC
Rules attached.
Applicant Name_
Address --
City
Phone # ( )
Authorized Agent
Affected ❑ Cw
AEC(s): 11 OEA
❑ PWS:
ORW: yes / no
rC_� fry i`
State ZIP
Fax #( )
❑EW El PTA
HHF ❑ IH
❑ FC:
PNA yes / no
❑ ES ❑ PTS
❑ UBA ❑ N/A
Crit. Hab. yes / no
Project Location: County
Street Address/ State Road/ Lot #(s)
Subdivision
ZIP
Phone # (_ ) _ River Basin
Adj. Wtr. Body__.__ (nat /man /unkn)
Closest Mal. Wtr. Body -SRR�- _
AA 7l
MEW mommminion
■■►�■■■■��■■�1,
►
-a��
MEMO
NIRL
■■
■■■■■■■
li
■■
■■■=
Ems
■i►Aii
■iwi�■®■ii■■�i■i
■■
�!UNIMM,
!
!I!L'�'9PiiOli\■!!■■■■
■■■■■■■■■l
■■■■■
■■■■■■■■
■■■�■
K
ft i ■■■ ■■■■ ■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■
■►\ I IMP—MEM �!■■■a■
■■�WOMME■B■■■■!!■■■
A" MINUMMEMMUMN Ems
�r�ii•r .Ir.2M
c
Agent WAPPlicant Printed Name
Signature ** Please read compliance statement on back of permit
Application Fee(s) Check #
Permit Officer's Signature
Issuing Date i I Expiration Date ++
Lo6lPlanning jurisdiction Rover File Name

Statement of Compliance and Consistency
This permit is subject to compliance with this application, site drawing and attached general and specific conditions. Any
violation of these terms may subject the permittee to a fine or criminal or civil action; and may cause the permit to become
null and void.
This permit must be on the project site and accessible to the permit officer when the project is inspected for compliance. The
applicant certifies by signing this permit that [)prior to undertaking any activities authorized by this permit, the applicant will
confer with appropriate local authorities to confirm that this project is consistent with the local land use plan and all local
ordinances, and 2) a written statement or certified mail return receipt has been obtained from the adjacent riparian
landowner(s) .
The State of North Carolina and the Division of Coastal Management, in issuing this permit under the best available
information and belief, certifythat this project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal Management Program.
River Basin Rules Applicable To Your Project:
❑ Tar- Pamlico River Basin Buffer Rules ❑ Other:
❑ Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules
If indicated on front of permit, your project is subject to the Environmental Management Commission's Buffer Rules for the
River Basin checked above due to its location within that River Basin. These buffer rules are enforced by the NC Division of
Water Quality. Contact the Division of Water Quality at the Washington Regional Office (252-946-6481) or the Wilmington
Regional Office (910-395-3900) for more information on how to comply with thesebuffer rules.
Division of Coastal Management Offices
Central Office
Mailing Address:
1638 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638
Location
Parker -Lincoln Building
2728 Capital Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
919-733-2293 / 1-888ARCOAST
Fax:[phone]
Elizabeth City District
1367 U.S. 17 South
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
252-264-3901
Fax:[phone]
(Serves: Camden, Chowan, Currituck,
Dare, Gates, Pasquotank and Perquimans
Counties)
Morehead City District
151-B Hwy. 24
Hestron Plaza II
Morehead City, NC 28557
202-808-2808
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Carteret, Craven, Onslow -above
New River Inlet- and Pamlico Counties)
Washington District
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
252-946-6481
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Beaufort, Bertie, Hertford, Hyde,
Tyrrell and Washington Counties)
Wilmington District
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
910-395-3900
Fax:[phone]
(Serves: Brunswick, New Hanover,
Onslow -below New River Inlet- and
Pender Counties)
www.nccoastalmanagement.net
Revised 10/05/01

CRYSTAL S WASLEY NCDL 2=597
264 FERRY DOCK RD
PO BOX 142 PH 252-729-1878 5134
GLOUCESTER, NC 28528
PAYTOTHE
��� •,,,Z /l -j 66-7704/2531
l• DATE
$ �GC� • C�ci
J �✓s� �� �; __DOLLARS 8 `'�a"^;�
State Employees' Credit Union
62 Morehead City, North Carolina
1:231770491:08606403388ff
S,
4

I, Mary Dudley Price, neighbor to Crystal and Thomas Wasley,
waiver the set back corridor regulation regarding the waterway
channel which runs in front of our property along the Straits water
body.
Signed: ,,� ,r,
Date: T��� ��

BA YSDEN B UILDERS
Buddy Baysden
119 Bogue Drive
Newport, NC 28570 Jul
252-726-3381 office & fax
e-mil: baysdenbuihJ@cfiLcom
O rr f -IS- L7 C
aa Xas�
R©0
T-XsU��n9
i0of rpmr
T
BootLtrfi
F
bX6'
.5+0 r-O J-e.
G,Y-ra
1757
P-T E
I � "< ;(sy
T-1)6C,V
S
A/
*SX )00- dC6 t<
(f(,1 �;g� �'a�c� "^rk)
YV�as ray LatcNPC,'( eP(gCr Y qla'-o Prop e►+y
,.+",01+t rcriQ4e34� �,t3 Ol,Clk,s L, u
Marine Construction
New Home Construction
Hone Repairs & Renovations

ADJACENT RIPARUN PROPERTY OWNER STATEMENT
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to C -4c� `\Jn-' c - is
(Name of Prope fty Owner)
property located at A U `i D t c)cl f 'Q �? t IRCn d
(Lot, Block, Road, etc.)
on (. V c...,�p n.�t�� c� , in �s c�: ��Y N.C.
(Waterbody) (Town and r County)
He has described to me as shown below, the development he is proposing at that location,
and, I have no objections to his proposal.
------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION AND/OR DRAWLNG OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
(To be filled in by individual proposing development)
j,Uw-T
P(ZJLc
RVZfA
S `'A 2ao
WC -ro
Cal~--T4 c- ��Cr+.
ar tZ
Signatu
Print or Type. Name
Telephone Numberf
]Date: `?;

ADJACENT RIPkRIAN PROPERTY OWNER STATEMENT
VQILC-
JUN 0 2 2003
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to7-1c, L-
(Name of Property OvvuJ-
er)
property located at A U 'A -0
(Lot, Block, Road, etc.)
I C � N. C.
G � 0 1 -
on a in ilk CQ Y,
(Waterbody) (Town an or County)
He has described to me as shown below, the development he is proposing at that location,
and, I have no objections to his proposal-
------------------------------------------------------------------- - ----------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION AND/OR D ',RAWPiG OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
(To be filled in by individual proposing development)
CA-6T
ZS0
r ro(z
�Wx
'fT
Poor
F 'xj%STJ-
.At C
zolkr "
fzqWP
4�
----------------------------
C V6
Signatute
nv-
Print or Type Name
FS
Telephone Number
Date:
r
T11

E /Asr
f-, L EU4noN
I�O UTft
px6y
Stara �
a�a
BA YSDEN B UILDERS
Buddy Baysden
119 Bogue Drive
Newpor4 NC 28570
2S2-726-3381 offxe & fax
e-mail: [e-mail] CX
as' o'f
Marine Construction
New Home Construction
Home Repairs & Renovations
JUN ® 2 e003

-% Bole
BA YSDEN B UILDERS
Buddy Baysdedn
119 Bogue Drive
Newpor4 NC 28570
252-726-3381 of ke & far
e-mail: baysdenbuUd@ca lissom
Marine Construction
New Home Construction
Home Repairs & Renovations
JUN 0 2 2003
�}- Dec, t h�

Piers over SAVs
Subject: Piers over SAVs
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 10:01:34 -0400
From: Charles Jones <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC ENR DCM
To: Tere Barrett <[e-mail]>
CC: Ted Tyndall <[e-mail]>
Crystal ? came by this morning looking for you. She was frustrated that
she hadn't heard anything about her pier request. Evidently, she was
aware of the SAV issue because she said she couldn't find anything on
our Web site that prohibited piers from going over them. I didn't tell
her anything except to say that I would mentioned to you that she came
by and have you call her.
I asked Brad what he was doing with piers being located over SAV's and
he said he was issuing permits and notifying Trish Murphy with DMF so
that they could monitor the site. This helped refresh my memory as to
what the ultimate outcome of the Bailey permit which DMF had originally
recommended for denial. DMF withdrew their denial because of lack of
concrete evidence over the degree of impacts. To help DMF begin their
research over the impacts of pier construction and use we agreed to let
DMF know of pending pier projects being located over SAVs so they could
monitor. Brad.has been doing this.
I would recommend that unless their is some other issue, we should issue
the GP and let Trish know. If there is some other reason not to issue a
GP other than the SAVs, then that's okay too.
(I have placed on your desk an email message from Pres which dealt with
the Bailey pier and a memo I sent to the field staff in 1998 asking them
to notify the COE when a project was being located over SAVs )
Let me know if you have any questions on this.
1 of 1 6/27/03 11:55 AM

Re: Piers over SAVs
Subject: Re: Piers over SAVs
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 16:21:04 -0400
From: Charles Jones <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC ENR DCM
To: Tere Barrett <[e-mail]>
I would issue the permit. I believe Lampe has a different issue and that would be potential impacts to
navigation.
Tere Barrett wrote:
Charles, I too have been issuing piers over SAV's, requiring the post hole digging thru the root mat. It
was not the issue of piers over SAV's but the issue of the docking facility ending in SAVs. This is
what Ron Sechler had said he could not recommend for under a major permit for Lampe. The reason
Crystal hasn't heard is because I have been dealing with her contractor, Buddy Baysden, who was told
on Friday that we were going to require a major permit, and said he was going to act as her agent in
the process. I didn't realize that Buddy would not communicate with his client. In fact, Crystal had
told me to speak with him rather than her because she would be going out of town for the week. The
memo from P3 addresses the effects of piers over SAV's, not the actual dock. I asked Brad if in fact
he has written any GP's for docking facilities terminating in SAVs, and he said that he has not
knowingly done so, and if he had one that terminated in SAV, he would raise the question for obvious
reasons. Do you want me to call Buddy Baysden back and tell him we will not require the major after
all? I really don't care one way or another except for the fact that Lampe is down the block, and this
issue has been the impediment to his proceeding with his application, since he has been told directly
by NMFS that they would have to recommend against the actual dock being in the SAVs, and any
extra length to get over the resource would conflict with other rules.
Charles Jones wrote:
Crystal ? came by this morning looking for you. She was frustrated that
she hadn't heard anything about her pier request. Evidently, she was
aware of the SAV issue because she said she couldn't find anything on
our Web site that prohibited piers from going over them. I didn't tell
her anything except to say that I would mentioned to you that she came
by and have you call her.
I asked Brad what he was doing with piers being located over SAV's and
he said he was issuing permits and notifying Trish Murphy with DMF so
that they could monitor the site. This helped refresh my memory as to
what the ultimate outcome of the Bailey permit which DMF had originally
recommended for denial. DMF withdrew their denial because of lack of
concrete evidence over the degree of impacts. To help DMF begin their
research over the impacts of pier construction and use we agreed to let
DMF know of pending pier projects being located over SAVs so they could
monitor. Brad has been doing this.
I would recommend that unless their is some other issue, we should issue
the GP and let Trish know. If there is some other reason not to issue a
GP other than the SAVs, then that's okay too.
(I have placed on your desk an email message from Pres which dealt with
the Bailey pier and a memo I sent to the field staff in 1998 asking them
to notify the COE when a project was being located over SAVs.)
Let me know if you have any questions on this.
1 of 2 6/27/03 11:56 AM

Re: Pier on Bogue Sound
Subject: Re: Pier on Bogue Sound
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 08:39:35 -0400
From: Preston Pate <[e-mail]>
To: Charles Jones <[e-mail]>, kristie corson <[e-mail]>
CC: Trish Murphey <[e-mail]>, Mike Marshall <[e-mail]>
Chas,
My staff and I met this week to review our position on the proposed pier in
Bogue Sound. The objection to the project we entered into the record
explained the concerns we have about the immediate and cumulative impacts of
this and other projects being built across beds of SAV. Although we feel
our concerns are valid, we have little empirical information on which to
base this denial request; therefore, our objection is being withdrawn. You
should place appropriate conditions on the permit to minimize impacts to the
SAV beds during construction.
It is our intent to survey the seagrass resource prior to construction and
monitor how it changes over time. We also will compile existing information
about potential impacts from shading from structures. We hope we can use
this information to work with your staff and the CRC to develop standards to
address our concerns. Give me a call if you need more information. P3.
Charles Jones wrote:
> If you get a chance tomorrow, please copy kristie with your email
> lifting DMF's objections to the Bailey permit application. We'd like to
> try and get it out asap and I'll be out the office tomorrow.
> Thanks
1 of 1 6/23/03 10:03 AM

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
NCDE14
JAMES B. HUNTJR.
Memo
GOVERNOR
To: DCM Field Staff
WAYNE MCDEVITT From: Charles Jones 82V�L
SECRETARY
Subject: Piers over Submerged Aquatic Vegetation
DONNA D. MOFFITT Date: November 6, 1998
DIRECTOR
Over the last several months, we have been discussing the potential impacts of pier
construction on submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) with the Corps of Engineers
(COE). The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) has expressed concerns to
the COE that potential adverse impacts to SAV could be caused by the shading
effects of pier decking and the associated boating activity which takes place adjacent
to the pier. The NMFS has provided copies of several studies which were done in
other parts of the country to help document the problem. I have previously sent a
copy of these reports to each of the field offices.
The COE has asked if we could help them quantify the number general permits we
issue for pier construction that have some portion of the structure over SAV. I have
agreed and would request you to denote on the face of the issued General Permit the
acronym "SAV" if any submerged vegetation is visible or present during your site
visit.
Thank you for your cooperation in this effort. If you have any questions, please call.
cc: Donna Moffitt
Mike Smith, COE
Jeff Richter, COE
Raleigh Bland, COE
MOREHEAD CITY OFFICE
HESTRON PLAZA II 151-B HIGHWAY 24 MOREHEAD CITY NC 28557
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER