34099_SUGGS, SUSAN_20030619

CAMA / ❑ DREDGE & FILL
GENERAL PERMIT
Previous permit #
[]New ❑Modification ❑Complete Reissue ❑Partial Reissue Date previous permit issued
As authorized by the State of North Carolina, Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant to 15A NCAC
❑ Rules attached.
Applicant Name ; � 1 < 00 S ►+ qs Project Location: County (a r +r , r i
Address fyl(,
rH,
�ca
City•x
State ZIP
Phone # ( `r' )777-
< !i
Fax # ( )
Authorized Agent
❑ CW
a EW
Al PTA ❑ ES ❑ PTS
Affected
AEC(s): ❑ OEA
❑ HHF
❑ IH ❑ UBA ❑ N/A
❑ PWS:
❑FC:
ORW: yes / o
PNA
yes / no Crit. Hab. yes / no
Street Address/ State Road/ Lot #(s)
/ E's O,r
'
Subdivision k Lb ,
City 1- ZIP
Phone # ( ) River Basin tV4L' 1 f
Adj. Wtr. Body (nat /man /unkn)
Closest Maj. Wtr. Body 4r/, M. Nry r - k ,, ,
Type of Project/ Activity T a .i r t ►1. o 1r c h {w r + k y emr r f l v ri c is ►
12 r ►(, �trwp �c V 1C41'V l+,.r�, �ohd 13 k'1eNrtrLb,v eJ ice f/,,�. (Scale: fA111-6
Pier (dock) length_
Platform(s) t t/ '- _...� _�-' _
Finger pier(s)
Groin length
number "
- - - _ -
Bulkhead/ Riprap length r I
avg distance offshore
max distance offshore
Basin, channel
- - -- --
cubic yards
Boat ramp — - - - -
-.J i'c t.. _..
Boathouse/ Boat 0 P" Nf I r�
1, ---I i i
Beach Bulldozing
Other_-- '( i
- -
i - -
7-7
Shoreline Length -- - l . r..._..�. .. .. f . C-.._ 7 S I - -
_ _.� f
SAV: notsure yes no Y
Sandbags: not sure yes no 1 _ ' _�
} ? -
Moratorium: n/a yes ng% I - __. _r . TI - -�
Photos: yes na
Waiver Attached: yes nog, r
A building permit may be required by: ❑ See note on back regarding River Basin rules.
Notes/ Special Conditions L!r p y nt I el h -cu 7 1 i 1 � t ef, Ir i (A ( /r L- e% , dh ti / �-k%l r � O� JAI f/
'rE�t�F r"'Vrt„, �I^'c�-'rC T'4' YViU1�11 /i�'/N•'� A•�f�J.f,
Agent or Applicant Printed Name
Signature ** Please read compliance statement on back of permit
P tom(.. o logl j
Application Fee(s) Check #
fr.r J /
Permit Officer's Signature
i-19 z3
Issuing Date Expiration Date
4 f*J0 lc. 7Cb/i J 14
Local Planning jurisdiction Rover File Name

Statement of Compliance and Consistency
This permit is subject to compliance with this application, site drawing and attached general and specific conditions. Any
violation of these terms may subject the permittee to a fine or criminal or civil action; and may cause the permit to become
null and void.
This permit must be on the project site and accessible to the permit officer when the project is inspected for compliance. The
applicant certifies by signing this permit that 1) prior to undertaking any activities authorized by this permit, the applicant will
confer with appropriate local authorities to confirm that this project is consistent with the local land use plan and all local
ordinances, and 2) a written statement or certified mail return receipt has been obtained from the adjacent riparian
landowner(s) .
The State of North Carolina and the Division of Coastal Management, in issuing this permit under the best available
information and belief, certifythat this project is consistentwith the North Carolina Coastal Management Program.
River Basin Rules Applicable To Your Project:
❑ Tar- Pamlico River Basin Buffer Rules ❑ Other:
❑ Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules
If indicated on front of permit, your project is subject to the Environmental Management Commission's Buffer Rules for the
River Basin checked above due to its location within that River Basin. These buffer rules are enforced by the NC Division of
Water Quality. Contact the Division of Water Quality at the Washington Regional Office (252-946-6481) or the Wilmington
Regional Office (910-395-3900) for more information on how to comply with thesebuffer rules.
Division of Coastal Management Offices
Central Office Elizabeth City District
Mailing Address: 1367 U.S. 17 South
1638 Mail Service Center Elizabeth City, NC 27909
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638 252-264-3901
Location:
Parker -Lincoln Building
2728 Capital Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
919-733-2293 / 1-888-4RCOAST
Fax: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Camden, Chowan, Currituck,
Dare, Gates, Pasquotank and Perquimans
Counties)
Morehead City District
151-B Hwy. 24
Hestron Plaza II
Morehead City, NC 28557
202-808-2808
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Carteret, Craven, Onslow -above
New River Inlet- and Pamlico Counties)
Washington District
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
252-946-6481
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Beaufort, Bertie, Hertford, Hyde,
Tyrrell and Washington Counties)
Wilmington District
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
910-395-3900
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Brunswick, New Hanover,
Onslow -below New River Inlet- and
Pender Counties)
www.nccoastalmanagement.net
Revised 10/05/01

SUSAN J SUGGS 099
PH 252-222-6110
1416 ZENO RD
APEX, NC 27502
PAY TO THE
ENP
e" 0C)Vfw
1040
66-7704/2531
fry�Q, v
DATE
CO
$ too,
DOLLARS ° �....
State Employees' Credit Union
98 _ r Rnnal__ei,h, North Carolina
�IO��- tAl�(�•k�i� 'Lim! # 4
FoR _ M
1: 253 17 70491:0863055 2607ml 1040

---
(FOR A PIFRIMOORING PILINGSIBOATLIFTIBOATNOL'SE)
I hereby ce:dy that I own property adiacent to floc Jas �'�a`m
(Nam' of Property Owner,
prom.. cy located at
L+ �
13ac� CveJe k oc'h
(Lot; Block, Road, etc)
on rjac V` C v <le,k , in t' ie r c uh ' , N.C.
(Waterbody) (Town and/or County))
H-- has to rile, cs s:i0wn below, t: -- deve!ODM--:,, 112 iS pr0p0S - L. I`iai IOCZ60il,
a:ld, . I have no objections to his proposal. I Lnee:sza-:d t`:=: a pie:lnoo1ir'E
pti!i�S Si v0c�!%rDOcCiOL'� must be C': OaC�{ 2 lninlri,Lrn d1SiaDCO 0: 1LG'.'n '�: (:�') FOrn ray c=z
of r-,72z-i2-:r1 access Lr:ltss waived by me.
I o not wis'n to wa:vz Ch- s-tb? N TZ3ulrerri::�:. JlltV 1 2 20173
I �n kis l to wa'i.ve t:c. 5--:back
DESCRIPTION A."D/OR DRAtiVLtiG OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT:
(To be f11ed is by indivi.au_fl proposir.; ee-;e!opnenr)
C� Wra d GK
C:
Cvrrcer1cave, 3 ca( r6sS-4.E c71CArs1-) 6r4Gc
k
1 :��j is r c. k;, A �i C1,1
i
J � r� -. Creek . .e� ar E �eo'v e y �, ff t`
and 0l IOn (t t �GC r1r1c
Qn x2S dock c���l, G, l3 a bcc�� J
CjC�Ck connec�eG1 it ��s r,c,<< �Ac c� w; ,cl �� x
Sima:urt -
Pi,1rit or TN (2
Te!eo�-lor�e \�sr<,�zr
Dace: '--//1©,3

VA
FA
a
t=1 N�
16 ►AMA
-t�q'vLjrr-t �;Ki3
x
V�
Ji
JUN �y% 2003
Y /
-Nr-V I V j - L',I-E
Lo-

Re: Request for help in obtaining dock permit with more info
Subject: Re: Request for help in obtaining dock permit with more info
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 13:56:52 +0000
From: "michele beyler" <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail], [e-mail]
Brad and Doug
Thanks for all your help and patience. Our response is:
"I do wish to waive the setback requirement."
If this is not sufficient or you need a specific format just let us know.
Marty Nevius and Michele Beyler
Doug ... the house sounds great. Everytime we get bad seas, we contemplate
building and living in a shed while doing so!! Can't wait to see your
house. We won't get there this summer as planned. But as soon as the
hurricane season is over we plan on coming north..... we'll see ya then!
>From: Brad Shaver <[e-mail]>
>To: Doug Champion <[e-mail]>
>CC: michele beyler <[e-mail]>
>Subject: Re: Request for help in obtaining dock permit with more info
>Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 07:56:00 -0400
>MIME -Version: 1.0
>Received: from scc074.its.state.nc.us ([207.4.22.38]) by
>mc2-f40.law16.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Mon, 16
>Jun 2003 04:56:11 -0700
>Received: from scc074.its.state.nc.us (127.0.0.1) by scc074.its.state.nc.us
>(6.5.029) id 3EBC085900163ECF; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 07:56:00 -0400
>Received: from ncmail.net (207.4.68.133) by scc074.its.state.nc.us
>(6.5.029) id 3EBC085700157D03; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 07:56:00 -0400
>X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jEHj Jx36Oi8+Q10JDRSDidP
>Message -ID: <[e-mail]>
>Organization: NC DENR DCM
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; U)
>X-Accept-Language: en
>References:<[e-mail]>
><[e-mail]>
>Return -Path: [e-mail]
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Jun 2003 11:56:11.0960 (UTC)
>FILETIME=[48067B80:0lC333FE]
>Yes Michelle, back on 6129100 you did waive the setback when you signed the
>letter of no objection for the first pier permit.
>Hope this helps,
>Brad
>Doug Champion wrote:
> > Michelle,
> > NO apologies needed :-) This is confusing...I agree. I appreciate you
> > taking the time to deal with.
> > I can't remember if you did or did not wave them before. I think you
1 of 5 6/17/03 11:22 AM

Re: Request for help in obtaining dock permit with more info
>did. I
> > think it does not matter as the dock is not planned within the setback
> > lines. Perhaps Brad could tell us whether or not you waived them the
>firs t
> > time? I will copy him on this reply.
> > Meanwhile, siding is on the house and progress continues. It is looking
> > nice. We are getting excited about it, but realize that completion is
>many
> > months away. Susan's job is in Carteret county now, so we are there a
>lot of
> > the time, with kind of deluxe camping the in the 10 X 16 shed. Several
> > friends have compared our shed existence to a live aboard boat but
>without
> > the water......
> > Thanks.
> > Best Regards,
> > Doug Champion
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "michele beyler" <[e-mail]>
> > To: <[e-mail]>
> > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 3:10 PM
> > Subject: Re: Request for help in obtaining dock permit with more info
>>>Hi Doug
> > > We got Brad's description. I guess our confusion still exists...
> > > 1. did we waive the rights before? NOT SURE
> > > 2. According to Brad's and your email, you won't be within the 15'
>limit
> > so
> > > do we need to waive the rights? I DON"T THINK SO.
> > > Sorry for the confusion. Again if we had the paper work with us we
>would
> > > give the same answer as before.
> > > Michele
> > > >From: "Doug Champion" <[e-mail]>
> > > >To: "michele beyler" <[e-mail]>
> > > >CC: <[e-mail]>
> > > >Subject: Request for help in obtaining dock permit with more info
> > > >Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 17:18:13 -0400
> > > >MIME -Version: 1.0
> > > >X-Originating-IP: [65.133.81.64]
> > > >X-Originating-Email: [[e-mail]]
> > > >Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.169.110]) by
>mc7-f9.lawl.hotma1l.com
> > > >with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 11 Jun 2003 14:19:43
>-0700
> > > >Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft
>SMTPSVC;
> > > >Wed, 11 Jun 2003 14:19:14 -0700
> > > >Received: from 65.133.81.64 by bay3-dav80.bay3.hotmail.com with
>DAV; Wed,
> > 11
> > > >Jun 2003 21:19:14 +0000
2 of 5 6/17/03 11:22 AM

Re: Request for help in obtaining dock permit with more info
> > > >X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jEHjJx36Oi8+Q1OJDRSDidP
> > > >References: <[e-mail]>
> > > >X-Priority: 3
> > > >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> > > >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
> > > >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
> > > >Message -ID: <[e-mail]>
> > > >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jun 2003 21:19:14.0504 (UTC)
> > > >FILETIME=(1BECDC80:01C3305F1
> > > >Return -Path: [e-mail]
> > > >Michelle,
> > > >Thanks for your prompt reply. Riparian access is an imaginary line
>more
> > or
> > > >less perpendicular to the shore extending out into the water. Our
>dock
> > > >structure is not planned to be within 15 of your western Riparian
>access
> > > >line, so I don't think it matters either way that you answer the
> > question.
> > > >I
> > > >am copying Brad Shaver who is the permitting officer. Maybe he can
>help
> > > >explain better. Please email him directly for a real professional
>cpinion
>>>>of
> > > >what it all means. We have not substantially changed the dock plans
>since
> > > >you signed off earlier. By all means, please get comfortable with it
> > > >before
> > > >you agree or disagree.
> > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > >From: "michele beyler" <[e-mail]>
> > > >To: <[e-mail]>
> > > >Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:41 PM
> > > >Subject: Re: Request for help in obtaining dock permit (again)
>>>>>Hi Doug
> > > > > Sounds like you are making great progress - can the house be far
> > behind!
> > > > > Please forgive us for being BRAIN DEAD from being down here but we
> > can't
> > > > > remember what "riparian
> > > > > access" is? Does that mean it's less than 15 feet from the
>property
> > > >line?
> > > > > We don't have a copy of the original plan with us or we would look
>it
> > > > > up... is it possible to email it to us or just a part of it?
> > > > > Regards, Marty and Michele
> > > > > >From: "Doug Champion" <[e-mail]>
> > > > > >To: "michele beyler" <[e-mail]>
> > > > > >Subject: Request for help in obtaining dock permit (again)
> > > > > >Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 17:15:01 -0400
3 of 5 6/17/03 11:22 AM

Re: Request for help in obtaining dock permit with more into
> > > > > >MIME -Version: 1.0
> > > > > >X-Originating-IP: [65.130.39.42]
> > > > > >X-Originating-Email: ([e-mail]]
> > > > > >Received: from hotmail.com ((65.54.169.138]) by
> > > >mc7-f19.law1.hotmail.com
> > > > > >with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Tue, 10 Jun 2003
> > 14:15:08 -0700
> > > > > >Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft
> > > >SMTPSVC;
> > > > > >Tue, 10 Jun 2003 14:15:08 -0700
> > > > > >Received: from 65.130.39.42 by bay3-dav108.bay3.hotmail.com with
> > > >DAV; Tue,
> > > > > >10 Jun 2003 21:15:08 +0000
> > > > > >X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jEHjJx36Oi8+Q1OJDRSDidP
> > > > > >X-Priority: 3
> > > > > >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> > > > > >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
> > > > > >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
> > > > > >Message -ID: <[e-mail]>
> > > > > >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Jun 2003 21:15:08.0570 (UTC)
> > > > > >FILETIME=[5EEC8FA0:01C32F95]
> > > > > >Return -Path: [e-mail]
> > > > > >Marty and Michelle,
> > > > > >Susan and I are reapplying for a permit to complete the
>construction
>>of
>>>>our
> > > > > >dock as the permit has expired and we have not completed the
> > previously
> > > > > >planned, permitted and approved work. To date we have
>constructed
> > 312
>>>>feet
> > > > > >of 5 feet wide dock across the
> > > > > >marsh and 104 feet of 5 feet wide dock extending into the creek.
> > What
>>>>we
> > > > > >are reapplying for that which is essentially the same that you
> > signed
> > > >off
> > > > > >on in 2000. It consists of an 8 feet by 25 feet dock to the west
> > with
> > > >a
>>>>13
> > > > > >feet by 13 feet boat lift. To the east a 10 feet by 16 feet
>fl oa ting
> > > >dock
> > > > > >is proposed connected to the main dock with a 2 �-2 feet by 16 feet
> > ramp.
> > > >We
> > > > > >need for you to agree to the following statement.
> > > > > >"I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to Douglas W.
>Champion
>>>>and
> > > > > >Susan J. Suggs property located at lot 3 Back Creek West ( 885
>Osprey
> > > >Point
> > > > > >Road) on Back Creek in Carteret County, NC. As described above,
>the
> > > > > >development that Susan and Doug are proposing at that location,
4 of 5 6/17/03 11:22 AM

Re: Request for help in obtaining dock permit with more info
>I
>>have
>>>>no
> > > > > >objection to this proposal. I understand that a pier, boatlift
>must
>>be
> > > >set
> > > > > >back a minimum distance of fifteen feet (15) from my area of
>riparian
>>>>>>access
> > > > > >unless waived by me."
> > > > > >Please respond with either of the following.
> > > > > >"I do not wish to waive the setback requirement."
> > > > > >"I do wish to waive the setback requirement."
> > > > > >Please respond to us and to Brad Shaver who is the permitting
>person
>>>>>>working
> > > > > >with us from the NC Coastal Area management Act office in
>Morehead
> > > >City.
> > > > > >[e-mail]
> > > > > >Thank -you for responding to this via email rather than US mail.
> > > > > >Hope all is well. Please email any questions. As always I enjoy
> > hearing
> > > >of
> > > > > >your journey.
> > > > > >Best Regards,
> > > > > >Doug Champion
> > > > > MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
> > > > > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
> > > STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
> > > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
5 of 5 6/17/03 11:22 AM

Fw: Request for help in obtaining dock permit (again)
Subject: Fw: Request for help in obtaining dock permit (again)
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 17:16:19 -0400
From: "Doug Champion" <[e-mail]>
To: <[e-mail]>
----- Original Message ----
From: Doug Champion
To: mic e e e er
Sent: I ues ay, June 10, 2003 5:15 PM
Subject: Request for help in obtaining dock permit (again)
Marty and Michelle,
Susan and I are reapplying for a permit to complete the construction of our
dock as the permit has expired and we have not completed the previously planned, permitted and
approved work. To date we have constructed 312 feet of 5 feet wide dock across the
marsh and 104 feet of 5 feet wide dock extending into the creek. What we
are reapplying for that which is essentially the same that you signed off
on in 2000. It consists of an 8 feet by 25 feet dock to the west with a 13
feet by 13 feet boat lift. To the east a 10 feet by 16 feet floating dock
is proposed connected to the main dock with a 2 1/2 feet by 16 feet ramp. We
need for you to agree to the following statement.
"I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to Douglas W. Champion and
Susan J. Suggs property located at lot 3 Back Creek West ( 885 Osprey Point
Road) on Back Creek in Carteret County, NC. As described above, the
development that Susan and Doug are proposing at that location, I have no
objection to this proposal. I understand that a pier, boatlift must be set
back a minimum distance of fifteen feet (15) from my area of riparian access
unless waived by me."
Please respond with either of the following.
"I do not wish to waive the setback requirement."
"I do wish to waive the setback requirement."
Please respond to us and to Brad Shaver who is the permitting person working
with us from the NC Coastal Area management Act office in Morehead City.
brad. shaver(a-,)ncmail. net
Thank -you for responding to this via email rather than US mail.
Hope all is well. Please email any questions. As always I enjoy hearing of your journey.
Best Regards,
Doug Champion
I of 1 6/17/03 11:22 AM

Request for help in obtaining dock permit with more into
Subject: Request for help in obtaining dock permit with more info
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 17:18:13 -0400
From: "Doug Champion" <[e-mail]>
To: "michele beyler" <[e-mail]>
CC: <[e-mail]>
Michelle,
Thanks for your prompt reply. Riparian access is an imaginary line more or
less perpendicular to the shore extending out into the water. Our dock
structure is not planned to be within 15 of your western Riparian access
line, so I don't think it matters either way that you answer the question. I
am copying Brad Shaver who is the permitting officer. Maybe he can help
explain better. Please email him directly for a real professional opinion of
what it all means. We have not substantially changed the dock plans since
you signed off earlier. By all means, please get comfortable with it before
you agree or disagree.
----- Original Message -----
From: "michele beyler" <[e-mail]>
To: <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:41 PM
Subject: Re: Request for help in obtaining dock permit (again)
> Hi Doug
> Sounds like you are making great progress - can the house be far behind!
> Please forgive us for being BRAIN DEAD from being down here but we can't
> remember what "riparian
> access" is? Does that mean it's less than 15 feet from the property line,
> We don't have a copy of the original plan with us or we would look it
> up... is it possible to email it to us or just a part of it?
> Regards, Marty and Michele
> >From: "Doug Champion" <[e-mail]>
> >To: "michele beyler" <[e-mail]>
> >Subject: Request for help in obtaining dock permit (again)
> >Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 17:15:01 -0400
> >MIME -Version: 1.0
> >X-Originating-IP: [65.130.39.42]
> >X-Originating-Email: [[e-mail]]
> >Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.169.138]) by mc7-fl9.lawl.hotmail.com
> >with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Tue, 10 Jun 2003 14:15:08 -0700
> >Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
> >Tue, 10 Jun 2003 14:15:08 -0700
> >Received: from 65.130.39.42 by bay3-dav108.bay3.hotmail.com with DAV;Tue,
> >10 Jun 2003 21:15:08 +0000
> >X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jEHjJx36Oi8+QIOJDRSDidP
> >X-Priority: 3
> >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
> >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
> >Message -ID: <[e-mail]>
> >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Jun 2003 21:15:08.0570 (UTC)
> >FILETIME=[5EEC8FA0:01C32F95]
> >Return -Path: [e-mail]
> >Marty and Michelle,
1 of 2 6/17/03 11:23 AM

Request for help in obtaining dock permit with more info
> >Susan and I are reapplying for a permit to complete the construction of
our
> >dock as the permit has expired and we have not completed the previously
> >planned, permitted and approved work. To date we have constructed 312
feet
> >of 5 feet wide dock across the
> >marsh and 104 feet of 5 feet wide dock extending into the creek. What we
> >are reapplying for that which is essentially the same that you signed
off
> >on in 2000. It consists of an 8 feet by 25 feet dock to the west with a
13
> >feet by 13 feet boat lift. To the east a 10 feet by 16 feet floating
dock
> >is proposed connected to the main dock with a 2 32 feet by 16 feet ramp.
We
> >need for you to agree to the following statement.
> >"I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to Douglas W. Champion and
> >Susan J. Suggs property located at lot 3 Back Creek West ( 885 Osprey
Point
> >Road) on Back Creek in Carteret County, NC. As described above, the
> >development that Susan and Doug are proposing at that location, I have
no
> >objection to this proposal. I understand that a pier, boatlift must be
set
> >back a minimum distance of fifteen feet (15) from my area of riparian
> >access
> >unless waived by me."
> >Please respond with either of the following.
> >"I do not wish to waive the setback requirement."
> >"I do wish to waive the setback requirement."
> >Please respond to us and to Brad Shaver who is the permitting person
> >working
> >with us from the NC Coastal Area management Act office in Morehead City.
> >[e-mail]
> >Thank -you for responding to this via email rather than US mail.
> >Hope all is well. Please email any questions. As always I enjoy hearing
of
> >your journey.
> >Best Regards,
> >Doug Champion
> MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
2 of 2 6/17/03 11:23 AM

Re: Request for help in obtaining dock permit with more info
Subject: Re: Request for help in obtaining dock permit with more info
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 11:29:12 -0400
From: "Doug Champion" <[e-mail]>
Reply -To: "Doug Champion" <[e-mail]>
To: "michele beyler" <[e-mail]>
CC: <[e-mail]>
Michelle,
NO apologies needed :-) This is confusing...I agree. I appreciate you
taking the time to deal with.
I can't remember if you did or did not wave them before. I think you did. I
think it does not matter as the dock is not planned within the setback
lines. Perhaps Brad could tell us whether or not you waived them the first
time? I will copy him on this reply.
Meanwhile, siding is on the house and progress continues. It is looking
nice. We are getting excited about it, but realize that completion is many
months away. Susan's job is in Carteret county now, so we are there a lot of
the time, with kind of deluxe camping the in the 10 X 16 shed. Several
friends have compared our shed existence to a live aboard boat but without
the water......
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Doug Champion
----- Original Message -----
From: "michele beyler" <[e-mail]>
To: <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 3:10 PM
Subject: Re: Request for help in obtaining dock permit with more info
> Hi Doug
>
> We got Brad's description. I guess our confusion still exists...
> 1. did we waive the rights before? NOT SURE
> 2. According to Brad's and your email, you won't be within the 15' limit
so
> do we need to waive the rights? I DON"T THINK SO.
> Sorry for the confusion. Again if we had the paper work with us we would
> give the same answer as before.
> Michele
> >From: "Doug Champion" <[e-mail]>
> >To: "michele beyler" <[e-mail]>
> >CC: <[e-mail]>
> >Subject: Request for help in obtaining dock permit with more info
> >Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 17:18:13 -0400
> >MIME -Version: 1.0
> >X-Originating-IP: [65.133.81.64]
> >X-Originating-Email: [[e-mail]]
1 of 6/17/03 11:23 AM

Re: Request for help in obtaining dock permit with more info
> >Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.169.110]) by mc7-f9.lawl.hotmail.com
> >with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 11 Jun 2003 14:19.43 -0700
> >Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
> >Wed, 11 Jun 2003 14:19:14 -0700
> >Received: from 65.133.81.64 by bay3-dav80.bay3.hotmail.com with DAV;Wed,
11
> >Jun 2003 21:19:14 +0000
> >X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jEHj Jx36Oi8+Q1OJDRSDidP
> >References: <[e-mail]>
> >X-Priority: 3
> >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
> >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
> >Message-ID:<[e-mail]>
> >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jun 2003 21:19:14.0504 (UTC)
> >FILETIME=[lBECDC80:0lC3305F]
> >Return -Path: [e-mail]
> >Michelle,
> >Thanks for your prompt reply. Riparian access is an imaginary line more
or
> >less perpendicular to the shore extending out into the water. Our dock
> >structure is not planned to be within 15 of your western Riparian access
> >line, so I don't think it matters either way that you answer the
question.
> >I
> >am copying Brad Shaver who is the permitting officer. Maybe he can help
> >explain better. Please email him directly for a real professional opinion
> >of
> >what it all means. We have not substantially changed the dock plans since
> >you signed off earlier. By all means, please get comfortable with it
> >before
> >you agree or disagree.
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "michele beyler" <[e-mail]>
> >To: <[e-mail]>
> >Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:41 PM
> >Subject: Re: Request for help in obtaining dock permit (again)
> > > Hi Doug
> > > Sounds like you are making great progress - can the house be far
behind!
> > > Please forgive us for being BRAIN DEAD from being down here but we
can't
> > > remember what "riparian
> > > access" is? Does that mean it's less than 15 feet from the property
> >line?
> > > We don't have a copy of the original plan with us or we would look it
> > > up... is it possible to email it to us or just a part of it?
> > > Regards, Marty and Michele
> > > >From: "Doug Champion" <[e-mail]>
> > > >To: "michele beyler" <[e-mail]>
> > > >Subject: Request for help in obtaining dock permit (again)
> > > >Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 17:15:01 -0400
> > > >MIME -Version: 1.0
2 of 4 6/17/03 11:23 AM

Re: Request for help in obtaining dock permit with more info
> > > >X-Originating-IP: [65.130.39.42]
> > > >X-Originating-Email: [[e-mail]]
> > > >Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.169.138]) by
> >mc7-fl9.lawl.hotmai1.com
> > > >with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Tue, 10 Jun 2003
14:15:08 -0700
> > > >Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft
> >SMTPSVC;
> > > >Tue, 10 Jun 2003 14:15:08 -0700
> > > >Received: from 65.130.39.42 by bay3-davl08.bay3.hotmail.com with
> >DAV; Tue,
> > > >10 Jun 2003 21:15:08 +0000
> > > >X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jEHjJx36O18+Q1OJDRSDidP
> > > >X-Priority: 3
> > > >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> > > >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
> > > >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
> > > >Message-ID:<[e-mail]>
> > > >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Jun 2003 21:15:08.0570 (UTC)
> > > >FILETIME=[5EEC8FAO:OIC32F95]
> > > >Return -Path: [e-mail]
> > > >Marty and Michelle,
> > > >Susan and I are reapplying for a permit to complete the construction
of
> >our
> > > >dock as the permit has expired and we have not completed the
previously
> > > >planned, permitted and approved work. To date we have constructed
312
> >feet
> > > >of 5 feet wide dock across the
> > > >marsh and 104 feet of 5 feet wide dock extending into the creek.
What
> >we
> > > >are reapplying for that which is essentially the same that you
signed
> >off
> > > >on in 2000. It consists of an 8 feet by 25 feet dock to the west
with
> >a
> >13
> > > >feet by 13 feet boat lift. To the east a 10 feet by 16 feet floating
> >dock
> > > >is proposed connected to the main dock with a 2 ;-2 feet by 16 feet
ramp.
> >We
> > > >need for you to agree to the following statement.
> > > >"I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to Douglas W. Champion
> >and
> > > >Susan J. Suggs property located at lot 3 Back Creek West ( 885 Osprey
> >Poin t
> > > >Road) on Back Creek in Carteret County, NC. As described above, the
> > > >development that Susan and Doug are proposing at that location, I
have
> >n o
> > > >objection to this proposal. I understand that a pier, boatlift must
be
> >set
> > > >back a minimum distance of fifteen feet (15) from my area of riparian
> > > >access
3 of 4 6/17/03 11:23 AM

Re: Request for help in obtaining dock permit with more info
> > > >unless waived by me."
> > > >Please respond with either of the following.
> > > >"I do not wish to waive the setback requirement."
> > > >"I do wish to waive the setback requirement."
> > > >Please respond to us and to Brad Shaver who is the permitting person
> > > >working
> > > >with us from the NC Coastal Area management Act office in Morehead
> >City.
> > > >[e-mail]
> > > >Thank -you for responding to this via email rather than US mail.
> > > >Hope all is well. Please email any questions. As always I enjoy
hearing
> >of
> > > >your journey.
> > > >Best Regards,
> > > >Doug Champion
> > > MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
> > > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
> STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
4 of 4 6/17/03 11:23 AM