34548_SANDY POINT HOA_20030715

❑ LAMA / U DREDGE & FILL
P I GENERAL PERMIT Previous permit #
CINA-w ❑Modification El Complete Reissue El Partial Reissue Date previous permit issued
As authorized by the State of North Carolina, Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant to 15A NCAC FJ • 13 '0
_ ® Rules attached.
Applicant Name t'"( flirA (/c j (, ll/ /4 :,
Address ' �) I
City i' ear 4Tg f State µ' ZIP c: SA
Phone#('�Z-)'3ZE- ticd Fax #( )
Authorized Agent ( kc, Is, -
Affected ❑ CW 0 EW O PTA ❑ ES ❑ PTS
AEC(s): ❑ OEA ❑ HHF ❑ IH ❑ UBA ❑ N/A
❑ PWS: ❑ FC:
ORW: yes / no PNA yes /(go Crit. Hab. yes / no
Project Location: County (a, 4 J • 4
Street Address/ State Road/ Lot #(s)
Subdivision ";1, / , . N )
CityVVI 4, ZIP %c �5, .
Phone # ( ) River Basin �F1' flr
Adj. Wtr. Body iJ, k vF /fnati /man /unkn)
C_.
Closest Maj. Wtr. Body /` oLl
Type of Project/ Activity j rc('o F, i 0 t G tf OSi iv nay e4 4V 4C.601 L''•- L c }
u. c}a j?I v a (rtom. (Scale: N_,NE )
Pier (dock) length
Finger pier(s)
Groin length
number
Bulkhead/ Riprap length_
avg distance offshore
max distance offshore
Basin, channel
ME
ri
■
■■■A■�MN
��Imti
�i:!wd
!
•
-
�-
■ 6
;bin
M.
SOME
M.■■■■■■■■■■l11�f1
'�?'
lip,
'
'ra11■■�■
•
ii►1R!ONES�►���utf►rl►a■■®■■■■i
��'ii
aGi1WINE•_
r�
ON-01r
i■EE■■■■■■■EW
.a
+�•.s
■�■
�
■■■MEN■
N
COMMON
■M■■■
�MMEEEEM
■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■
,L
V o L .i y
Agent or Applicant Printed Name �
Signature* Please read compliance statement on back of permit
P)cr" co
Application Fee(s) Check #
Permit Officer's Signature
Issuing Date Expiration Date
i1r, it I I � (C , X 5 ctI yJ P-
Local Planning Jurisdiction Rover File Name

Statement of Compliance and Consistency
This permit is subject to compliance with this application, site drawing and attached general and specific conditions. Any
violation of these terms may subject the permittee to a fine or criminal or civil action; and may cause the permit to become
null and void.
This permit must be on the project site and accessible to the permit officer when the project is inspected for compliance. The
applicant certifies by signing this permit that 1) prior to undertaking any activities authorized by this permit, the applicant will
confer with appropriate local authorities to confirm that this project is consistent with the local land use plan and all local
ordinances, and 2) a written statement or certified mail return receipt has been obtained from the adjacent riparian
landowner(s) .
The State of North Carolina and the Division of Coastal Management, in issuing this permit under the best available
information and belief, certify that this project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal Management Program.
River Basin Rules Applicable To Your Project:
❑ Tar - Pamlico River Basin Buffer Rules
❑ Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules
❑ Other:
If indicated on front of permit, your project is subject to the Environmental Management Commission's Buffer Rules for the
River Basin checked above due to its location within that River Basin. These buffer rules are enforced by the NC Division of
Water Quality. Contact the Division of Water Quality at the Washington Regional Office (252-946-6481) or the Wilmington
Regional Office (910-395-3900) for more information on how to comply with thesebuffer rules.
Division of Coastal Management Offices
Central Office
Mailing Address:
1638 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638
Location:
Parker -Lincoln Building
2728 Capital Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
919-733-2293 / 1-888ARCOAST
Fax: [phone]
Elizabeth City District
1367 U.S. 17 South
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
252-264-3901
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Camden, Chowan, Currituck,
Dare, Gates, Pasquotank and Perquimans
Counties)
Morehead City District
151-B Hwy. 24
Hestron Plaza II
Morehead City, NC 28557
202-808-2808
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Carteret, Craven, Onslow -above
New River Inlet- and Pamlico Counties)
Washington District
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
252-946-6481
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Beaufort, Bertie, Hertford, Hyde,
Tyrrell and Washington Counties)
Wilmington District
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
910-395-3900
Fax: [phone]
(Serves: Brunswick, New Hanover,
Onslow -below New River Inlet- and
Pender Counties)
www.nccoastalmanagement.net
Revised 10/05/01

i
SANDY POINT NOA INC
Pay to the
Order of_
B"�-.JT���TT
BRANCH Bg)NKINGR1 AND
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA`v
1' or �7ek'� r c lJ1 C 3��J V
I:0532
- 11647597nI1n
4 /•, A•An..•rnn
340
Date '� /�3 65-112/53I
also)
�I
Dollars B ��
4X� a�
0340 � I -
GUARDIA-SAFE 7Y8--1 =- l

■ Complete items 1, 2, and .3. Also complete
Nin 4 if Restricted Delivery is degired.
f Print your name and address on the reverse
j so that we can return the card to you.
1 ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
i or on the front if space permits.
I
} 1. Article Addressed to:
A. Siff:i"�
❑ Agent
X`� • ❑ Addressee i
B. Received by ( Printed N e) C. Date of Delivery
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. kpice Type
FiSi
ertified Mail ❑ Express Mail
Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise Ij
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number
(Transfer from service label) 7002 0 510 0001 9 919 ]LSD
Ps Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt
102595-01-M-2509

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE First -Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
USPS
Permit Na. G-10
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
P-/,-
COOZ f

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
A. Sign ure
X Agent
❑ Addressee 1
B. Rece1i ed by ( ipted Name), . Date of Delivery +
D. Is delivery address different from item 11 ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. S ice Type
ertified Mail ❑ Express Mail
111 Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise !
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
Z. Hrnae Number
(transfer from service label 7002 0 5 Z 0 0007,
9 919 3667
•, �o i 1, August 2001
Domestic Return Receipt
— — 102595•o1

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE =aq
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
Eoo

1:3 C-
Ln -D
—0
,
m m
rr Er
r-=i Postage $ 1� - A � Postage $
0— Certified Fee 2 �) ``�O� rk Er Certified Fee '2� 30
Po tmark
,� rq Return Receipt Fee
Return Receipt Fee } ` /) • -"'�"1e �- V�
O (Endorsement Required) / ( 1 LY O (Endorsement Required)
O C3
� Restricted Delivery Fee MA u A /l tt00n O Restricted Delivery Fee
(Endorsement Required) V L 3 (Endorsement Required)
rl Total Postage & Fees $ ( Y ri Total Postage & Fees $ Y
Lr) Ln
CD Sent To
i] Sent To ( O ---- _` --tJ ------------- -�-
--- ��--_--' j
ft-1 ------------- -- t- ---------- - - -------------- fL Street. Apt. No.;
Street, Apt. No.; ,
or PO Box No.
or PO Box No. // ----------- -- _ f•-_ `
CS�---- /J// //�� /f
C.f+/ -�/ - - f --- -- City, St e. 1 4
Postmark
MAR IVe2003

.. r
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Michael F. Easley, Governor Donna D. Moffitt, Director William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
July 16, 2003
Mr. Michael S. Rose
13 Pier Pointe
New Bern, NC 28562
Dear Mr. Rose:
This correspondence is in reference to your March 17, 2003 letter of objection to the
Sandy Point Homeowners Association (HOA) proposal for a rock access ramp. The project
would be located on lot #70 in Sandy Point Subdivision, in Merrimon, on the Neuse River,
Carteret County, North Carolina.
In your letter you voiced several concerns over the water -access ramp actually being a
boat ramp, the stability of the rock used in the construction of the ramp, the shallowness of the
water in the area, and the potential impacts of the ramp on the shoreline affecting
accretion/erosion of sand in the area. Rest assured that the Division of Coastal Management
(DCM) has reviewed your concerns and have worked with the applicants to ensure that the
proposed project is in compliance with the pertinent rules of the Coastal Resources
Commission. After much discussion, a lot of project modifications, and many specific
conditions being attached, the DCM issued CAMA General Permit #34548-C to the HOA
authorizing the proposed access ramp.
Enclosed you will find a copy of the permit with specific conditions. If you wish to
appeal this permit decision, you may file a request with the Director of the Division of Coastal
Management, Ms. Donna Moffitt, Department of Environment and Natural Resources within
20 days of the permit decision. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please don't
hesitate to contact me at my Morehead City Office (252-808-2808).
Sincerely,
M. Ted Tyndall
District Manager
Enclosures
cc: Brad Shaver - DCM Field Representative, DCM
Charles S. Jones - Assistant Director, DCM
151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza II, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled \ 10% Post Consumer Paper

r�
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Michael F. Easley, Governor Donna D. Moffitt, Director William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
July 16, 2003
Mike and Marilyn Shuping
Lot #69, Sandy Point Drive
Beaufort, NC 28516
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Shuping:
This correspondence is in reference to your March 16, 2003 letter of concern to the
Sandy Point Homeowners Association (HOA) proposal for a rock access ramp. The project
would be located on lot #70 in Sandy Point Subdivision, in Merrimon, on the Neuse River,
Carteret County, North Carolina.
In your letter, you voiced several concerns including the stability of the rock ramp and
the potential impacts of the ramp on the shoreline affecting accretion/erosion of sand in the
area. Rest assured that the Division of Coastal Management (DCM) has reviewed your
concerns and have worked with the applicants to ensure that the proposed project is in
compliance with the pertinent rules of the Coastal Resources Commission. After much
discussion, a lot of project modifications, and many specific conditions being attached, the
DCM issued CAMA General Permit #34548-C to the HOA authorizing the proposed access
ramp.
Enclosed you will find a copy of the permit with specific conditions. If you wish to
appeal this permit decision, you may file a request with the Director of the Division of Coastal
Management, Ms. Donna Moffitt, Department of Environment and Natural Resources within
20 days of the permit decision. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please don't
hesitate to contact me at my Morehead City Office (252-808-2808).
Sincerely,
Qe
M. Ted Tyn all
District Manager
Enclosures
cc: Brad Shaver - DCM Field Representative, DCM
Charles S. Jones - Assistant Director, DCM
151-8 Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza II, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] Internet: www.nccoastaimanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled \ 10% Post Consumer Paper

S � ��- Nam,
co
JAN
g�
PpIs
io

,J 4 .s
MAR 19 2003
March 17, 2003
Division of Coastal Management
Hestron Plaza II, 151-B,
Hwy. 24
Morehead City, NC 28557
Re: Adjacent Riparian Property Owner Notification/Waiver Form, Lot #71
I have reviewed the proposed Water -Access Ramp described in the application
submitted by the Sandy Point Homeowners Association for Lot 70, or Commons Area.
I am opposed to the construction of such a ramp. After extensive consultations with
Marine Engineers, CAMA Experts, and my own experience with the effects of storms on
this shoreline, I am against this project. My reasons are as follows:
• 100% of the experts I consulted confirmed the fact that such a ramp, or access, will
not survive the first major storm, let alone a hurricane.
• The "Water -Access" ramp is really a boat ramp. Given the ramp width, length, and
construction description, a storm of any significance will destroy the integrity of the
ramp. This will potentially leave large boulders as well as the gravel topping used in
the ramp scattered all along the site of the boat ramp. These boulders will create a
hazard for both swimmers and boaters, as well as an eyesore.
• Due to the extreme shallowness of the water in this area, only very small boats, keel -
less sailboats, and jet skis would be potential users. Neither of the two boat types
could cause material damage, but the constant action of the wakes created by jet
skis will serve to further aggravate the erosion of the shoreline.
• The degradation of such a ramp will irreparably alter the natural ebb and flow of sand
at this point. Lot #69 is particularly at risk for destruction of the sand barrier between
the sound and the spring -fed pond and adjacent wetlands. In the last major storm
prior to shoreline stabilization, Lot # 71 lost over fifty feet of lot depth, not to mention
dozens of trees, shrubs and other vegetation which serve to stabilize the soil.
• Since the shoreline stabilization project 2 years ago, running from lot #69 to #74?,
the entire shoreline has not suffered any major deterioration.
• Finally, should the applicant, the Sandy Point Homeowners Association, be granted
a permit to construct such a boat ramp, I will expect written agreement from the
Association to repair any and all property damage to lot #'s 69, 70, and 71, occurring
after the beginning of construction on this boat ramp.

XL,�' I. L
Michael S. and Susan B. Rose MAR 1 9 2003
13 Pier Pointe
New Bern, NC 28563
2

4
R 19 2003
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION/WAIVER Assoc,M
CL►1 � O ! �O YYI Q C9 l,:i •t S:/'S /7.
Name of Individual applying for Permit:
Address of Property:Ze J� 2 a
SQn� P�,nf e-
(Lot or Street i#, Street or Road, City & County)
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to the above referenced property. The individual
applying for this permit has described to me as shown on the attached drawing the development
they are proposing. A description or drawing, with dimensions, should be provided with this
letter.
I have no objections to this proposal.
If you have objections to what is being proposed, please write the Division of Coastal
Management, Hestron Plaza H, 151-B, Hwy. 24, Morehead City, NC, 28557 or call (252) 808-
2808 within 10 days of receipt of this notice. No response is considered the same as no objection
if you have been notified by Certified Mail.
WAIVER SECTION
I understand that a pier, dock, mooring pilings, breakwater, boat house, lift or sandbags must be
set back a minimum distance of 15' from my area of riparian access unless waived by me. (If you
wish to waive the setback, you must initial the appropriate blank below.)
I do wish to waive the 15' setback requirement.
V* I do not wish to waive the 15' setback requirement.
. J lkkm-W ii -o3
Signature n Date
�tGN I�EL S. ROSE
Print Name
25� L3� 23ivG
Telephone Number With Area Code

,kDJACEA'T WARAN PROPERTY OWNER STATEMY-NT
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to�S 0 1
(Name of Property Owner)
property located at
(Lot, Block, Road, etc.)
�j ��C � � Uk in .err o av tre,�, ht.C.
on
(Wa�tea�body) �. ,. ---- (Town and/o County)
lie has described to me as shown below,
and, I ;acre no objections to his proposal.
the development he is proposing at that location,
W—
MAR 19 200i
DESCRIPTION AND/OR DRAWING OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
(To be jVled in by individual proposing development)
c
J
we- M
n o YTa►� of R7f ��7n�-
-------- ------------------------- -... --...........................................................................
Signature
Print or Ty?e Name
Telephone Number
Date:

.0 .
November 8, 2002
Matthew Peter Nolty
514 Sandy Point Drive
Beaufort, NC 28516
Dear Mr. Nolty,
N®I/ I v
2ec�,
Although I have not yet received my copy of the Adjacent Riparian Property
Statement, I did see the copy of a proposed drawing for a beach access. I will
not support construction of the proposed beach access for a number of reasons.
Please allow me to list just a few.
Prior to purchasing lot 71 at Sandy Point, both Jerry Evans and Ed
Mitchell of Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company described to me the
"beach access" envisioned at the time of the development. We purchased
lot 71 knowing full well that Weyerhaeuser had set aside funds for and had
oral discussions about an access which was described to me as follows:
o "A gradual leveling of the grade to allow access for very shallow
draft vessels, (Hobie Cats, Sunfish, etc)". Weyerhaeuser proposed
the placement of a small section of metal mesh similar to the type
used by the military to stabilize an otherwise shifting and unstable
surface upon which to move vehicles and facilitate access to the
water for wheeled vehicles to load/unload boats, etc.
2. There is no disagreement that the access as described above was fully
addressed, discussed and agreed to prior to the purchase of lot 71. In
point of fact, there was specific written language in my purchase contract
regarding both proximity to and direction of such a beach access adjacent
to lot 71. As described, this access was to be used only casually, and
only by property owners from Sandy Point and the Weyerhaeuser South
River development.
3. Approximately 2-1/2 years ago, a very elaborate shoreline stabilization
project was undertaken. Starting at the Shuping property (lot 69), and
running sequentially up towards 78-80? (1 am not sure where the shoreline
stabilization ends) the entire shoreline was stabilized. Beginning with lot
70, the shoreline was trenched to a depth of approximately three feet
below the existing grade level. The entire shoreline trench was then lined
with a special mesh fabric designed to prevent silt escapement, and loss
of sand through wave action. Large granite boulders were trucked in from
Rocky Mount, and were placed by a "cherry -picker" device to maximize
interlocking and minimize the likelihood of shifting. Over time, the sand
has come and gone somewhat since the shoreline stabilization. The
heaviest loss has been principally on lot 69 and the adjacent portion of 70.
However, from 71 upwards, there had been a very nice buildup of sand.

r
Some lots are enjoying the formation of mini -sand dunes created by wind-
blown sand blowing up and over the stabilized shore. Numerous property
owners have planted a native sea grass which has thrived nicely and has
propagated very effectively over the past two years.
4. As sketched in your proposal, your plan appears to call for the following:.,
a. A "cutting through", "rounding over", removal, alteration or
otherwise reducing the existing height of the present stabilized
shoreline to gain access to the water
b. Creation of some sort of a downward -sloping approach which
would begin its down -slope ahead of the new "high point" (or low
point, depending on definition) on the now -breeched previously -
stabilized seawall.
c. Removal, cutting through, destruction or degradation of the silt -
mesh installed to prevent sand erosion behind/between and under
the granite boulders to gain access to the beach.
d. The removal of existing sea grasses and other native vegetation it
the area which further serves to stabilize that area.
e. Potential removal of indigenous living trees which would further
negatively affect the soils held together by the root structure of
these trees.
5. Here are just a few of my concerns regarding the construction of
such a beach access (please refer to item #1 of this memo): I knew and
accepted the "terms of the deal" for the purchase of lot 71, based on the
oral commitments made to me and my wife by Ed Mitchell and Jerry
Evans to prior purchase of lot 71.
6. In a hand -drawn sketch, you propose to breach the seawall adjacent to my
now -stabilized and growing property, and install an access point for north-
eastern driven windstorms to eat away at the most vulnerable section of
both lot 71 as well as the property adjacent to me, lot 70.
7. 1 invested over $12,000 in the stabilization of the shoreline of lot #71 after
the loss of over almost 100' of depth of my lot's sea frontage not to
mention over 70 trees, following Hurricane Dennis.
8. In a recent article in Environment magazine, they point out a very relevant
fact, "...economic analysis also revealed a strong relationship between
good beach quality and the price of inland and waterfront properties. In
the southeast United States, waterfront and inland property values are
higher in communities with good beach conditions... If beach conditions
deteriorate... property values decrease by as much as 20%. Protective
armoring (shoreline stabilization) increases the value of waterfront
property by about 25W
6, i
`�11C`�

9. In a publication from UNESCO, they state, "Removing vegetation from the
dunes destabilizes these protective sand barriers, resulting in increased
soil and dirt particles being washed offshore. ...this is a key habitat for
many species of crabs, fish, and seabirds, as well as for the smaller
creatures that serve as food for these larger animals". The same article
states that..."Since 1995, the Atlantic Basin, (including the Atlantic Ocean,
the Caribbean Sea, and the Gulf of Mexico) has entered a more active
hurricane cycle, which may continue for more than 20 years."
10. The Heinz Center recently published an extensive article stating that "the
effects of armoring (shoreline stabilization), generally last longer than
other methods".
11. To summarize, I am strongly against the construction of any access that
would breach the existing shoreline stabilization. I was at Sandy Point
yesterday. In just the last northeaster, Weyerhaeuser lost almost all their
sand and seagrass. I lost almost half of my sand, but more importantly,
because of the wave and water action, ALL the shoreline boulders have
actually sunk about two feet vertically into the sandbed, lowering the level
of my shoreline, and making my property even more susceptible to
overwash in the event of storms. Repeating earlier items above, I knew
the construction of a simple beach access was a possibility. But, that
access was to be built from the prior shoreline, and was never intended
(according to my recollection and Weyerhaeuser's) to be built in such a
method that would pose such serious threats.
12. In my opinion, if a pair of large seawalls parallel with and on each side of
the proposed ramp, extending perpendicularly to the shoreline running out
100 to 150 feet from the shoreline, and 3-4 feet above mean high water,
this might provide a measure of reassurance that further washing away
my property could be avoided. I seriously doubt that Weyerhaeuser would
pay for it, and I doubt CAMA would permit it. In discussing the proposed
access with Weyerhaeuser officials several weeks ago, they suggested
that in lieu of construction the access, the HOA take the money set aside
for this access and use it to improve the entryway to Sandy Point-- an
entry worthy of the beautiful area we will be calling our homes. The
present entryway certainly does not reflect the quality of the area, and
should be significantly improved. Using Weyerhaeuser's set -aside money,
we can have an entryway we can all be proud of.

I sincerely hope that you and the association can see this issue from my point of
view. I hope you can appreciate the fact that I potentially could suffer irreparable
loss of frontage due to an alteration to the existing stabilized shoreline. I also
hope CAMA has the wisdom to disallow such a potentially damaging breach to
occur.
Sincerely,
Michael S. Rose
13 Pier Pointe
New Bern, NC 28562
Cc: Brad Shaver, CAMA
Claude Wheatley, Esq.
Doug Hylton, Weyco

MAR 2 12.003
'To: Division of Coastal Management
From: Mike and Marilyn Shuping
Lot # 69, Sandy Point Drive
Beaufort, NC
Carteret County
Re: Adjacent Riparian Property Owner Notification/Waiver Form
Date: March 16, 2003
... 0 . 0 . 0 ... E ■ ................... a ......... ■ ■ .......................... 0 ■ 1
After reviewing the proposed drawings and discussing the project with Mr. Brad Shavers
of CAMA, we wish to express the following concerns:
a) Mr. Shavers was very concerned with the stability of the water access ramp. He
stated that a ramp extending into the Neuse River would be damaged or destroyed
by the first major storm, thereby scattering rocks over the neighboring beaches.
Additionally, these scattered rocks would create underwater hazards to bathers
and boats.
b) There was also a discussion on the feasibility of the sand building up on one side
of the ramp and eroding on the other side. On Lot #69, CAMA will not allow for
rocks to be laid over the existing bank in order to stabilize the bank. This is due
to the 404 wetlands that are just behind the already heavily eroded beach.
Construction of this ramp could further jeopardize an already precarious
condition.
c) If the homeowners wish to proceed with this project we would request an
assurance in writing that the homeowners association restore the adjoining beaches on
lot #69 and #71 or any other beach front property that may be affected to their
original state prior to construction. We would also request in writing what measures
would be taken to repair the ramp after storms.
I +ir 0'J -4 J� 4,121�,

•� r
NOW V 101.101 O Kil.-WO Mao 11495 \ .' - - __ _ a
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
MAR 2 1 2003
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER NOT-IIFIC/A/TION/WAIVER FORM
Name of Individual applying for Permit:
Address of Property:
(Lot or Street #, Street or Road, City & County)
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to the above referenced property. The individual
applying for this permit has described to me as shown on the attached drawing the development
they are proposing. A description or drawing, with dimensions, should be provided with this
letter.
I have no objections to this proposal.
If you have objections to what is being proposed, please write the Division of Coastal
Management, Hestrvn Plaza H, I51-B, Hwy. 24, Morehead City, NC, 28557 or call (252) 808-
2808 within 10 days of receipt of this notice. No response is considered the same as no objection
if you have been notified by Certified Mail.
WAIVER SECTION
I understand that a pier, dock, mooring pilings, breakwater, boat house, lift or sandbags must be
set back a minimum distance of 15' from my area of riparian access unless waived by me. (If you
wish to waive the setback, you must initial the appropriate blank below.)
I do wish to waive the 15' setback requirement.
I do not wish to waive the 15' setback requirement.
Signature - 1 Date
,1'\4.91��13 SNoP' G-
Print Name
3 3b-�b � � 33b- 541-1267
Telephone Number With Area Code

' MrBrad Shaver
` Subject: MrBrad Shaver
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 15:46:36 -0400
From: "matt.nolty" <[e-mail]>
To: <[e-mail]>
Mr. Brad Shaver
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Recourses
Heston Plaza 11
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Mr. Brad Shaver:
The Small Watercraft Access ramp located on common area Lot #70, within the Sandy Point Sub -division, will be
constructed of the same size and material that the present stabilized wall is constructed of. The present wall is made of
Granite each piece is app. 50 to 100 lbs. The top of the ramp will be made as smooth as possible using the flat side of these
pieces. The ramp will butt the stabilized wall, and run parallel to the existing point located on this site and extending past it
by about 1 Oft.
Matthew P. Nolty
Sandy Point Homeowner's Association
1 of 1 4/7/03 4:12 PM

Re: Sandy Point beach access Lot 70
' Subject: Re: Sandy Point beach access Lot 70
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 15:04:16 -0400
From: Brad Shaver <Brad. Shaver@ncmail. net>
Organization: NC DENR DCM
To: Michael Rose <[e-mail]>
Apparently after speaking with Pete this morning the stakes I placed under the advisement of Mr.
August were incorrect. The ramp is proposed in approximately the same location but is proposed to
extend 10' beyond the "point" which still puts it well inside of 20' seaward of the normal water level, the
regulation restriction. I hope your conversation with Pete clarified the proposal. Let me know if I can be
any more help.
Brad
Michael Rose wrote:
Brad, thanks for sending the photos to me showing the proposed beach access. After Pete Nolty received his
photos, he called me to inform me that the "ramp" will be approximately 35 feet long, as opposed to the 10-12
feet ramp length you described. Will you please clarify the length of the proposed beach access ramp?
1 of 1 7/15/03 10:04 AM

rvy-r'xa
F-00O Of
tfA7 e�-�1 f►�
RE f 0 �dv
h
0
d

Sandy Point Comm
May 8,,2QW3
. I.
f
Waterward extent of proposed f5iffp

IcI
Ajdy Point -Co I
f I
May 8, 2003, V
4
4
ax
IIL
AL
VIA
4i
44
1(1 04
i4
4
Ilia":
I
Raterwarc�6-fif"'b"f 'p""ropo'"s-6-
L
ramp

lop,
VK-
Aw
27
Ir—
p4h
' As
to
it tic
oqp
Ana

Point Commo -Ar
4 , P1VIa 8, 2003 Y,
s
+;do
MA07,
..6
Waterward extent of ramp
I

I nt on Area
If
fr-
01

AGIA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Michael F. Easley, Governor Donna D. Moffitt, Director William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
July 16, 2003
Mr. Michael S. Rose
13 Pier Pointe
New Bern, NC 28562
Dear Mr. Rose:
This correspondence is in reference to your March 17, 2003 letter of objection to the
Sandy Point Homeowners Association (HOA) proposal for a rock access ramp. The project
would be located on lot #70 in Sandy Point Subdivision, in Merrimon, on the Neuse River,
Carteret County, North Carolina.
In your letter you voiced several concerns over the water -access ramp actually being a
boat ramp, the stability of the rock used in the construction of the ramp, the shallowness of the
water in the area, and the potential impacts of the ramp on the shoreline affecting
accretion/erosion of sand in the area. Rest assured that the Division of Coastal Management
(DCM) has reviewed your concerns and have worked with the applicants to ensure that the
proposed project is in compliance with the pertinent rules of the Coastal Resources
Commission. After much discussion, a lot of project modifications, and many specific
conditions being attached, the DCM issued CAMA General Permit #34548-C to the HOA
authorizing the proposed access ramp.
Enclosed you will find a copy of the permit with specific conditions. If you wish to
appeal this permit decision, you may file a request with the Director of the Division of Coastal
Management, Ms. Donna Moffitt, Department of Environment and Natural Resources within
20 days of the permit decision. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please don't
hesitate to contact me at my Morehead City Office (252-808-2808).
Sincerely,
M. Ted Tyndall
District Manager
Enclosures
cc: Brad Shaver - DCM Field Representative, DCM
Charles S. Jones - Assistant Director, DCM
151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza II, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled \ 10% Post Consumer Paper

K Se it, J,T.t 77Y Yrgt
Z �S J,4,, ol,d
9(0 39� /zeq 6
�I7- J.w , t7 6 1- l izS
SPu L--ale POI

904
July 21, 2003
Ms. Donna Moffett
Director
NCDENR
Division of Coastal Management
151-B Hwy 24,
Hestron Plaza 2
Morehead City, NC 28557
Re: Permit No. 34548-C—Lot #70 Sandy Point Subdivision Rock Access Ramp
Please let this serve as notification that I wish to appeal the decision referenced above.
I am an adjacent lot owner (Lot 71) and have concerns regarding the size, type of
construction, potential for increase in damage to my property, length and design of this
proposed "Rock Access Ramp." Please advise me of the procedures I should follow to
carry this appeal forward.
Sincerely,
AiA4V I j�
Michael S. Rose
13 Pier Pointe
New Bern, NC 28562
Cc: Pete Nolty, Sandy Point HOA
Brad Shaver, CAMA
Charles S. Jones, CAMA

2 Questions
Subject: 2 Questions
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 08:58:32 -0400
From: "Michael S. Rose" <674661 @cox.net>
To: "Brad Shaver" <brad. shaver@ncmail. net>
Brad, two questions for you, please:
• Do you/your office have jurisdiction in New Bern area?
• What's involved if I want to pull out a short piling, and replace it with a longer piling in the exact same
place? (On my slip in one of those little creeks off the Trent River)
Thanks for doing the job on the boat access at Sandy Point. I think it will work out fine.
1 of 1 8/26/03 9:19 AM

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Michael F. Easley, Governor Donna D. Moffitt, Director William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
November 17, 2003
Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company
c/o Mr. Doug Hylton
800 Potomac Drive
Chocowinity, NC 27817
Subject: Access Ramp on Lot# 70
Sandy Point Subdivision
Carteret County
Dear Mr. Hylton:
This letter serves as confirmation that the water access point on Lot #70 Sandy Point
Subdivision has been installed within the limits of the issued general permit. General Permit#
34548 was issued for a water access ramp on 7/15/03. The project was completed shortly after
permit issuance and this office has confirmed the finished access point is compliant with General
Permit # 34548.
The project site was visited shortly after Hurricane Isabel to assess the damage from the
storm. A portion of the smaller rock used to fill gaps in the ramp had been displaced, a result of
the storm surge. The Sandy Point HOA is aware that the rock can be replaced within the
footprint of the original permit without requiring an additional permit from this Division.
I hope this correspondence satisfies your role with this particular project. If you have any
additional questions concerning this or other matters, please don't hesitate to give me a call at
my office [phone].
Sincerely,
1wt P��
Brad Shaver
Coastal Management Field Rep.
151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza II, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled \ 10% Post Consumer Paper